alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel RFA-AI-09-040 Protection of Human Health by Immunology and Vaccines U01.                     

*Date:*                         March 1-3, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Lalique, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Quirijn Vos, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIH/NIAID/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-2666,                         *qvos@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 1, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-2563 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S

AUSTIN, TEXAS

M A R K F I B R A N Z , §

A p p e l l a n t , §

v s . § N O . 05-14-01203-CR

§

T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S , §

A p p e l l e e . §

M O T I O N F O R E X T E N S I O N O F T I M E

T O T H E H O N O R A B L E J U D G E O F S A I D C O U R T:

COMES NOW MARK FIBRANZ, Appellant, by and through his Attorney of Record, MARK T.

LASSITER, and tenders, pursuant to the Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(d), this Motion for

Extension of Time. In support of this motion. Appellant would show the following:

I .

Mr. Lassiter has been involved with several jury trials and has not been able to finish

researching to submit a petition for discretionary review.

II.

This motion is not made for purposes of delay but that justice may be done. This is Appellant's

first request for a continuance.

WHEREFORE, PREMISIS CONSIDERED, the Defendant/Appellant respectfully requests that

this motion be granted.

PAGE - 1

PD-0837-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 7/6/2015 3:38:10 PM

Accepted 7/7/2015 4:05:38 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 11392 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

TARVINN DJUAN WILLIAMS ,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:17

- CR

- 41

- 1

Before SOUTHWICK, WILLETT, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Tarvinn Djuan
Williams has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Williams h a s not filed a resp onse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 20 , 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-11392 Document: 00514519890 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2018No. 17

- 11392

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdra w is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-11392 Document: 00514519890 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2018
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Form 10-KSB Annual Report of Winmax Trading Group Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the undersigned hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

o     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: May 7, 2005

/s/Robert S. Kergan
-----------------------------------
Robert S. Kergan
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
584 A.2d 203

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. R.M.R.

May 1, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000921052
<NAME>                      WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS IV, L.P., SERIES4
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             470,940
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   470,940
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,315,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,276,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,315,944
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     5,358
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       19,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   200,872
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (215,020)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (215,020)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (215,020)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his/her capacity as an
officer of Variflex, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to his knowledge:



the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated:    March 5, 2004
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /s/ Raymond H. Losi II 
|                        |  |                        
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer





|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated:    March 5, 2004
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /s/ Petar Katurich     
|                        |  |                        
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer



20
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 15, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

136228 (23) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

ROBERT BABUR BASAT, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 136228 

 COA: 282091 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $47.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$328.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 15, 2008 

Clerk
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-18-00110-CR

JAMES BUNK PHELPS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 276th District Court

Titus County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR 19,405

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
2

O RDER

Our review of the reporter’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as 

that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who 

was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(3). Volumes one, 

two, three, four and six of the reporter’s record contain the name of a person who was a minor at 

the time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an 

electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain 

sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper 

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because volumes 

one through four and volume six of the reporter’s record contain sensitive data, we order the clerk 

of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed 

volumes one through four and volume six of the reporter’s record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: January 22, 2019
EXHIBIT 11
                 MULTIMEDIA ACCESS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 STATEMENT RE: CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED             FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                     SEPTEMBER 30,                         SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                           ----------------------------------    ----------------------------------
LOSS PER SHARE DATA:                                            1996              1997                1996              1997
                                                           ----------------  ----------------    ----------------  ----------------
                                                             (UNAUDITED)       (UNAUDITED)         (UNAUDITED)       (UNAUDITED)

<S>                                                           <C>               <C>                 <C>               <C>          
NET LOSS AS REPORTED IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS              $ (1,022,925)     $ (1,416,835)       $ (3,081,082)     $ (4,395,244)
                                                           ----------------  ----------------    ----------------  ----------------

Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding                                                   5,054,314         8,026,197           4,774,326         7,523,947

Common and common equivalent shares issued
  in the twelve month period preceding the filing
  date of the initial public offering as required by
  SAB  No. 83:
     Common stock                                                        -                 -             140,507                 -
     Incentive stock options                                       266,356                 -             266,356                 -
     Non-qualified stock options                                    40,208                 -              40,208                 -
     Warrants                                                      778,613                 -             778,613                 -
                                                           ----------------  ----------------    ----------------  ----------------

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON AND COMMON
  EQUIVALENT SHARES OUTSTANDING AS REPORTED IN THE
  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS                                           6,139,491         8,026,197           6,000,010         7,523,947
                                                           ----------------  ----------------    ----------------  ----------------

LOSS PER SHARE AS REPORTED IN THE FINANCIAL
  STATEMENTS                                                       $ (0.17)          $ (0.18)            $ (0.51)          $ (0.58)
                                                           ================  ================    ================  ================
</TABLE>


                                       14
#### Reginald M. GREENWICH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D10-430.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Jan. 11, 2011.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Leonard R. Ross, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

*ON CONCESSION OF ERROR*

PER CURIAM.

Reginald M. Greenwich appeals his judgment and sentence. He argues that *610the judgment fails to accurately reflect his convictions, and that the trial court erred by increasing his sentence after he had begun serving it. We agree, and remand with directions to correct the judgment and to impose the original sentence.

Greenwich was charged with several felonies. Following a jury trial, he was convicted of the misdemeanor offenses of domestic violence battery, trespass in a structure, battery, and assault. At the sentencing hearing held on December 16, 2009, Greenwich was sentenced to time served for the trespass and assault convictions and to concurrent terms of 364 days in the county jail on each of the battery charges. However, the written judgment and sentence fails to reflect either the trespass or assault convictions.1

For reasons not apparent from the record, a second sentencing hearing was conducted on January 22, 2010. At the conclusion of that hearing and over Greenwich’s objection, the trial court re-sentenced him to consecutive terms of one year in the county jail on each of the battery charges, followed by two six-month terms of probation to be served consecutively to the jail sentences for the two remaining misdemeanors. The net result of the resentencing was a sentence enhanced from one year in the county jail to two years in the county jail followed by a year of probation.

On appeal, Greenwich contends, and the State properly concedes, two errors in the sentencing process. First, the original judgment erroneously indicated that the court had set aside the trespass and assault convictions. In fact, Greenwich was sentenced to time served on both those counts. On remand, the judgment should be corrected accordingly. Second, the court erred when it resentenced Greenwich to a greater term, as he had begun serving his sentence and the imposition of a harsher sentence violates double jeopardy principles. *See Engram v. State,*853 So.2d 1123, 1124 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

For these reasons, on remand, the trial court shall correct its judgment to reflect that Greenwich received time served for the trespass and assault convictions and reimpose the sentences orally pronounced for the remaining two charges.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

1

. The plea and sentence order stated: "The Court set aside the two lessers of the verdict form. The higher lesser of the verdict form will stand.” We are not sure what this means.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2014-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 

Dated March 18, 2015

 

 
|   | /s/   Brian E. Schaaf                              |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Brian   E. Schaaf                                  |
|   | Vice   President and Assistant Treasurer           |
|   | Ford   Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|   | (senior   officer in charge of servicing function) |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Blyth, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending October 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert H. Barghaus, Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, except for the matters set forth in Part II —Item 5 of this Quarterly Report; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|        |   | /s/ Robert H. Barghaus                     |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Robert H. Barghaus                         |
|   |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | December 11, 2006                          |
|   |   |                                       |

 

This certification is made solely for thepurpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge standard containedtherein, and not for any other purpose.

----