alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7259 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7259

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
certain federally-subsidized loan repayments for dental school faculty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2018

   Ms. Clarke of New York (for herself, Mr. Simpson, and Mr. Gosar) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
    Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
certain federally-subsidized loan repayments for dental school faculty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dental Loan Repayment Assistance 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN FEDERALLY-SUBSIDIZED LOAN REPAYMENTS FOR 
              DENTAL SCHOOL FACULTY.

    (a) In General.--Section 108(f)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by inserting ``, under a loan repayment program 
receiving a grant or contract under section 748(a)(2) of such Act'' 
after ``section 338I of such Act''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 108(f)(4) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``National health service 
corps loan repayment program and certain state loan repayment 
programs'' in the heading thereof and inserting ``certain federal and 
state loan repayment programs''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received in taxable years beginning after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (d) GAO Report.--The Comptroller General of the United States shall 
review and report to the appropriate committees of Congress on the 
participation of dental providers and faculty in areas and schools 
receiving funding from the Dental Faculty Development and Loan 
Repayment Program under section 748(a)(2) of the Public Health Service 
Act, including the extent to which they remain full-time faculty 
teaching and practicing in dental clinics located in dental schools, 
hospitals, or community-based affiliated sites after receiving funding 
from the program.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1644 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1644

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to clarify the definition of 
                ``supervisor'' for purposes of such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2007

  Mr. Andrews (for himself, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Engel, Mr. 
  Holt, Mr. Kildee, Mrs. Maloney of New York, Ms. Matsui, Mr. George 
   Miller of California, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. 
 Stark, Mr. Waxman, and Mr. Young of Alaska) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Labor Relations Act to clarify the definition of 
                ``supervisor'' for purposes of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Re-Empowerment of Skilled and 
Professional Employees and Construction Tradesworkers (RESPECT) Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SUPERVISOR.

    Section 2(11) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 
152(11)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``and for a majority of the individual's 
        worktime'' after ``interest of the employer'';
            (2) by striking ``assign,''; and
            (3) by striking ``or responsibility to direct them,''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7006

ARSEAN L. HICKS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

D. A. BRAXTON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief

District Judge. (CA-03-885-1)

Submitted: August 11, 2004 Decided: October 28, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arsean L. Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Arsean L. Hicks appeals from the dismissal of his 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as untimely filed. An appeal may not

be taken to this court from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that jurists of

reason would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have reviewed the record and conclude that Hicks has

not made the requisite showing. We therefore deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Isaac BINDA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D10-493.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 14, 2011.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Emily Ross-Booker, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laura Fisher, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

*Affirmed. See Colon v. State,*738 So.2d 1023 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

MAY, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
#### Michael WEIMORTS, Appellant, v. Wendy SHOCKLEY, Appellee.

No. 1D10-2660.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 17, 2010.

Kenneth B. Bell and Robert J. Powell of Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond & Stackhouse, Pensacola, for Appellant.

No appearance, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Weimorts appeals an order extending a temporary injunction for protection against dating violence, entered the same day the court denied Weimorts’ motion to dismiss for improper venue. Because section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2009), providing for a protective injunction against dating violence, does not contain a special venue provision, the trial court was required to apply the general venue provision in section 47.011, Florida Statutes (2009). *Barr v. Fla. Bd. of Regents,*644 So.2d 333, 335 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Under section 47.011, “[a]ctions shall be brought only in the county where the defendant resides, where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located....” See *Hill v. Fields,*813 So.2d 212, 213 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) *387(holding that wife petitioning for domestic violence injunction was required to file in county of former husband’s residence and venue in county of wife’s residence was improper).1 Weimorts resides in Walton County, any cause of action accrued in Walton County, and the third option allowing venue where the property in litigation is located is not applicable. Thus, venue lies only in Walton County. As a result, the trial court reversibly erred in refusing to transfer venue from Okaloosa County, the residence of the complainant Wendy Shockley,2 to Walton County. *Hill,*813 So.2d at 213.

REVERSED.

KAHN, VAN NORTWICK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

1

. Subsequent to the decision in *Hill,*the legislature amended section 741.30, Florida Statutes, to add a special venue provision, section 741.30(l)(j), allowing a petition to be filed in the circuit where the petitioner resides. Ch. 2002-55, § 13, at 793, Laws of Fla. There is no indication by the legislature that this special venue provision applies outside chapter 741.

2

. We recognize, as did the trial court, that under the instructions to family law form 12.980(n) appended to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure, a petitioner filing a petition for prohibition against dating violence is instructed to file the petition in the circuit where she lives. However, these instructions cannot contradict section 47.011. *Barr,*644 So.2d at 335 ("[t]he general venue statute controls actions brought under the common law or under statutes not containing a specific provision respecting venue.”).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,137,000
<SECURITIES>                                10,093,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              329,751,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           373,587,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             370,646,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      306,085,000
<BONDS>                                     20,973,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        80,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,508,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               370,646,000
<SALES>                                    100,705,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           101,783,000
<CGS>                                       65,550,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               65,550,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            32,884,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,382,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,967,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   882,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,085,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,085,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 784 

To amend title 28 of the United States Code to exclude the State of New 

Jersey from the prohibition on professional and amateur sports gambling 

to the extent approved by the legislature of the State. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2017 

Mr. PALLONE (for himself and Mr. LOBIONDO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28 of the United States Code to exclude 

the State of New Jersey from the prohibition on professional and amateur sports gambling to the extent approved by the legislature of the State. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New Jersey Betting 

5 and Equal Treatment Act of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 784 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY FROM 

2 THE PROHIBITION ON AMATEUR AND PRO3 FESSIONAL SPORTS GAMBLING TO THE EX4 TENT APPROVED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF 

5 THE STATE. 

6 Section 3704(a) of title 28, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

9 end; 

10 (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at 

11 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(5) a lottery, sweepstakes, or other betting, 

14 gambling, or waging scheme operating exclusively in 

15 the State of New Jersey, to the extent such scheme 

16 is approved by the legislature of the State by stat17 ute.’’. 

18 SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY. 

19 The amendments made by this Act apply to conduct 

20 occurring on or after the date of the enactment of this 

21 Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
VIFEWCAST.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED (UNAUDITED) AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       7,492,466
<SECURITIES>                                 3,488,992
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,923,633
<ALLOWANCES>                                   186,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,460,949
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,388,580
<PP&E>                                       3,042,909
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,698,118
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,356,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,641,499
<BONDS>                                      4,450,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         95
<COMMON>                                         1,597
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,263,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,356,501
<SALES>                                      3,951,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,296,796
<CGS>                                        2,013,202
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,013,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,271,165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                86,776
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             237,058
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,520,502)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,520,502)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,520,502)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25635]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Review of Minority Biomedical 
Research Chemistry Grant Applications.
    Date: November 4, 2010.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, 1 Bethesda Metro 
Center, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: John J. Laffan, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 
3AN18J, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2773, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 5, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-25635 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000921363
<NAME> TROY HILL BANCORP, INC.
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,012
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      9,066
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         88,716
<ALLOWANCE>                                      (717)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,628
<DEPOSITS>                                      53,253
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,867
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,959
<LONG-TERM>                                     21,083
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 102,628
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,543
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  151
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   335
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,949
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,239
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,982
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,967
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   6
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,472
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    561
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         561
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       360
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .3
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.17
<LOANS-NON>                                        341
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,004
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   687
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  717
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               717
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Robert JACKSON, III v. James K. LEBLANC, Sec. of Dept. of Pub. Safety & Corr.; Dept. of Pub. Safety & Corr.

No. 2010-CI-0682.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2011.

In re Jackson III, Robert; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 567,652; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 CA 1131.

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61478-61479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24942]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RM06-16-010; RM06-16-011]


Mandatory Reliability Standards for the Bulk Power System; Notice 
Allowing Post-Technical Conference Comments

September 24, 2010.
    On September 23, 2010, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
conducted a Technical Conference on Frequency Response in the Wholesale 
Electric Grid. The purpose of the technical conference was to provide 
an opportunity for a public discussion regarding technical issues 
pertaining to the development of a frequency response requirement. All 
interested persons are invited to file written comments on or before 
October 14, 2010, that relate to the issues discussed

[[Page 61479]]

during the technical conference. Commenters are encouraged to use the 
questions presented in the agenda for the conference to organize their 
comments.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24942 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Cobalt Operating, LLC; Cobalt Operating; * From the 106th District

Blue Ridge Resources, LLC; Court of Dawson County,

Crosstex Services, LLC; and Mark Burkett, Trial Court No. 15-11-19697.

Vs. No. 11-16-00295-CV * January 6, 2017

Arismendez Construction, LLC, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has considered the parties’ joint motion to affirm in part, 

modify in part, and remand, and we conclude that the motion should be 

granted. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed insofar as it relates to Appellant Cobalt Operating, 

LLC; the judgment of the trial court is vacated insofar as it relates to the 

remaining Appellants and is modified to reflect a take-nothing judgment in 

their favor; and the cause is remanded to the trial court. The costs incurred by 

reason of this appeal are taxed one-half against Cobalt Operating, LLC and 

one-half against Arismendez Construction, LLC.