alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

PR 21-0004

IN RE PETITION OF RENEAU J. LONGORIA

FOR REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS

IN THE STATE BAR OF MONTANA

FILED

APR 2.0 2021

ORDERBowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

.tatgp of Montana

Reneau J. Longoria has petitioned this Court for reinstatement to active status in the

State Bar of Montana. The petition indicates that Longoria voluntarily chose inactive

status, but does not indicate when this occurred. The Court has checked with the State Bar,

which indicates that Longoria has been on inactive status for well over five years. It is the

Court's practice in such cases, given the amount of time since Longoria has been on active

status, to require a character and fitness review and the completion of continuing education.

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner shall submit to an investigation

conducted by the Commission on Character and Fitness, which, in its discretion, may be a

limited investigation. Petitioner shall comply with the character and fitness process and

timely produce information and documentation as requested by the Commission. The

Commission will investigate Petitioner's character and fitness in accordance with the Rules

of Procedure of the Commission on Character and Fitness. The Commission will advise

the Court whether the Petitioner has been certified, conditionally certified, or denied

certification. If the Commission denies certification, the Commission will issue written

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a decision pursuant to Section 5(c)(6) of the Rules

of Procedure of the Commission on Character and Fitness. If the Petitioner is certified or

conditionally certified by the Commission on Character and Fitness, the Petitioner shall be

admitted to the active practice of law in Montana upon payment of appropriate dues and

fees and penalties to the State Bar of Montana.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if admitted, within six months of admission to

the active practice of law, Petitioner shall submit to the Board of Continuing Legal

04/20/2021

Case Number: PR 21-0004
Education, P.O. Box 577, Helena, MT 59624, proof of attendance at thirty hours of

approved Continuing Legal Education to be credited to the tirne Petitioner was on inactive

status. This may include approved credits previously obtained by Petitioner during the last

two years, if any.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State

Bar of 

Montana'

DATED this?-b day of April, 2021.

Chief Justice

Justices
585 A.2d 381

#### JUDY SHAABAN v. NABEEL A. SHAABAN.

September 18, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John BRANNON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-6994.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 2000.

Decided Jan. 8, 2001.

*145John Brannon, pro se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

John Edward Brannon seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.2000) motion as untimely. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Brannon’s notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded sixty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal when the United States is a party, Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App.P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on March 14, 2000. Bran-non’s notice of appeal was filed on July 12, 2000. Because Brannon failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
585 A.2d 402

#### WILLIE E. LE GRAND v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD.

October 16, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET OF MULTIMEDIA ACCESS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES AS
OF  JUNE  30,  1997  (UNAUDITED)  AND  THE  RELATED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT  OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997  (UNAUDITED)  AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                            1,454,648
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       358,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                         29,000
<INVENTORY>                                       1,409,861
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3,310,334
<PP&E>                                            1,140,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (424,892)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4,222,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,762,676
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                817
<OTHER-SE>                                        2,458,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4,222,302
<SALES>                                             793,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    834,101
<CGS>                                               410,763
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       410,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,379,027
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     17,149
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  227,814
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2,978,409)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (2,978,409)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2,978,409)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.41)
                                               


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.3


 


Legato
Merger Corp. II


777
Third Avenue, 37th Floor


New
York, New York 10017


 


November
22, 2021


 


Crescendo
Advisors II, LLC


777
Third Avenue, 37th Floor


New
York, New York 10017


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration
statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of securities of Legato Merger Corp. II (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation
by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration
Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), Crescendo Advisors II, LLC
shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative and support services as may be required by the Company from
time to time, situated at 777 Third Avenue, 37th Floor, New York, New York 10017 (or any successor location). In exchange therefore,
the Company shall pay Crescendo Advisors II, LLC the sum of $15,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter
until the Termination Date. Crescendo Advisors II, LLC hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any
kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) to be established upon
the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result
of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account
for any reason whatsoever.


 


[Signature
Page Follows]


 






     


     


    

 


	 	Very truly
    yours,
	 	 	 	 
	 	LEGATO MERGER
    CORP. II
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
Gregory Monahan
	 	 	Name: 	Gregory Monahan
	 	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer


 


	AGREED TO AND
    ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 	 
	CRESCENDO ADVISORS
    II, LLC	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
Eric Rosenfeld	 
	 	Name:	
    Eric Rosenfeld	 
	 	Title:	Senior Managing Member	 


 


[Signature
Page to Administrative Services Agreement]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-24-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                              19,199
<SECURITIES>                                        12,294
<RECEIVABLES>                                       21,645
<ALLOWANCES>                                            72
<INVENTORY>                                          6,838
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    61,929
<PP&E>                                             110,141
<DEPRECIATION>                                      49,196
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     127,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               13,353
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               43,930
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                          24,472
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       127,163
<SALES>                                             76,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    76,957
<CGS>                                               64,519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       64,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3,194
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,792
<INCOME-TAX>                                           679
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,113
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,113
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .18
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 849 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 849

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
       Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2017

Mr. Roe of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. Ruiz, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Gosar, Mr. 
Hurd, Mr. Bost, Mr. Abraham, Mr. King of Iowa, Mrs. Brooks of Indiana, 
Mr. Hensarling, Mrs. Wagner, Mr. Bucshon, Mr. Marshall, and Mr. Allen) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
    Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and 
Commerce, and Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
       Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Seniors' Access to 
Medicare Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE INDEPENDENT PAYMENT ADVISORY BOARD.

    Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), sections 3403 and 10320 of 
such Act (including the amendments made by such sections) are repealed, 
and any provision of law amended by such sections is hereby restored as 
if such sections had not been enacted into law.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 12-30184 KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff v. PERKINS ROWE ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., Defendant

------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------ KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee v. THORNCO, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:09-CV-497 Before BARKSDALE, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D Decem ber 1 9, 2 012 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion s houldnot * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. Case: 12-30184 Document: 00512089088 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2012

### No. 12-30184

Af t e r reviewing the record, studying the briefs, and listening to o r a l arguments, we AFFIRM th e judgment of the district court for essentially the same reasons given by the district court in its well-reasoned Ruling on Motions for Summary Judgment. KeyBank Nat’l Ass’n v. Perkins Rowe Assocs., LLC, 823 F.Supp.2d 399 (M.D.La. Oct. 11, 2011). AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-30184 Document: 00512089088 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/19/2012
585 A.2d 342

#### HERMAN FLORES v. SCHERER G & C CORPORATION, ET AL.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 402

#### DENNIS DESMOND v. PAREID, INC.

October 16, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Orlando RIVERA v. COMMAND CONSTRUCTION, LLC.

No. 2011-CC-0750.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re Command Construction LLC; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory *995and/or Remedial Writs Office of Workers’ Compensation Dist. 07, No. 09-07535; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-C-140.

Denied.
No. 11,083.

#### Neiman et al. *v.*State, ex rel. Dickey, Commissioner.

*Dbainage.*— Complaint *to Collect Assessment.*— In an action, under sections 4273-4284, R. S. 1881, to collect a ditch assessment, the complaint must state facts showing that the assessment was made upon the defendant’s land, that it was confirmed by the judgment of the court, and that the defendant was a party to the proceedings.

*'Same.*— Copy *of Assessment.*— In such action it is necessary to file with the complaint a copy of the assessment creating the lien.

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

*J. W. Robinson,*for appellants.

Hammond, J.

Action by appellee against appellants to enforce the lien of a ditch assessment. The proceedings were had under the law of 1881, prior to the amendments of 1883, regulating such proceedings in circuit courts. For the reasons given in *Wishmier*v. *State, etc.,*97 Ind. 160, the judgment will have to be reversed, on account of the insufficiency ■of the complaint.

There is another ground, not specifically considered in that *59case, for holding the complaint bad, and that is that there was not filed with it a copy of the assessments made by the commissioner of drainage who was charged with the construction of the work. *Crist*v. *State, ex rel.,*97 Ind. 389; sections 4277-8, R. S. 1881. It may be suggested, however, that as to proceedings had after the statutory amendments of 1883, it is necessary to file with a complaint for the collection of assessments a copy of the assessments made by the commissioners of drainage as confirmed and approved by the court, with a copy of the order of approval. Section 6, as amended by section 5, Acts 1883, p. 179.

Filed Oct. 18,1884.

In actions of this kind it is essential to file with the complaint a copy of the assessment which creates the lien. *West*v. *Bullskin, etc., Co.,*19 Ind. 458; *Alkire*v. *Timmons Ditching Co.,*51 Ind. 71; *Jerrell*v. *Etchison Ditching Ass’n,*62 Ind. 200; *Busenbark*v. *Etchison Ditching Ass’n,*62 Ind. 314.

Reversed, with costs, with instruction to sustain the demurrer to the complaint, and for further proceedings.
#### Steve GARABEDIAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D11-811.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 10, 2012.

James L. Eisenberg and Kai Li Aloe Fouts, of Eisenberg & Fouts, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melvin G. Mosier, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order summarily denying appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. The records attached by the trial court do not conclusively refute appellant’s allegation that trial counsel incorrectly advised him before the plea that he could move for a “downward departure” from the mandatory minimum penalties provided by the drug trafficking statute. *See*§ 893.135(4), Fla. Stat. (2009). The law is well settled that the trial court cannot *sua sponte*reduce the mandatory minimum sentence required by the drug trafficking statute absent a motion by the State. *State v. Taylor,*411 So.2d 993 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). We remand for the court to hold an evidentiary hearing or to attach records, if any exist, that conclusively refute the claim.

*Reversed and remanded.*

HAZOURI, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 63159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25582]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    The following notice of meeting is published pursuant to the 
provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, 5 
U.S.C. 552b.

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: The Commission has scheduled two meetings for the 
following dates:

October 19, 2010 at 9:30 a.m.
October 26, 2010 at 9:30 a.m.


PLACE: Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC. 
Lobby Level Hearing Room (Room 1000).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission has scheduled these meetings 
to consider the issuance of various proposed rules. Agendas for each of 
the scheduled meetings will be made available to the public and posted 
on the Commission's Web site at http:[sol][sol]www.cftc.gov at least 
seven (7) days prior to the meeting. In the event that the times or 
dates of the meetings change, an announcement of the change, along with 
the new time and place of the meeting, will be posted on the 
Commission's Web site.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: David A. Stawick, Secretary of the 
Commission, 202-418-5071.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-25582 Filed 10-12-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25659]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS10-5]


Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:

Location: FDIC Building, 1776 F Street NW., Room 4085, Washington, DC 
20429.

Date: October 13, 2010.

Time: 10:30 a.m.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered: 

Summary Agenda: September 22, 2010 minutes--Open Session.
    Louisiana Compliance Review.
    Texas Compliance Review.
    (No substantive discussion of the above items is anticipated. These 
matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the ASC 
requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.)

Discussion Agenda: National Registry Fee.

How to Attend and Observe an ASC meeting: E-mail your name, 
organization and contact information to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cba6aeaebfa2a5acb88baab8a8e5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="87eae2e2f3eee9e0f4c7e6f4e4a9e0e8f1">[email protected]</span></a>. You may also 
send a written request via U.S. Mail, fax or commercial carrier to the 
Executive Director of the ASC, 1401 H Street NW., Ste. 760, Washington, 
DC 20005. Your request must be received no later than midnight, ET, on 
Tuesday, October 12, 2010. Attendees must have a valid government-
issued photo ID and must agree to submit to reasonable security 
measures. The meeting space is intended to accommodate public 
attendees. However, if the space will not accommodate all requests, the 
ASC may refuse attendance on that reasonable basis.

    Dated: October 6, 2010.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-25659 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>