alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, U.S.D.A.

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

On November 3, 2010, the U.S Forest Service will host a meeting of the federally designated Secure Rural Schools Resource Advisory Committee (RAC). The public is invited to attend the meeting and provide input. A Secure Rural Schools RAC provides advice and recommendations to the Forest Service on the development and implementation of special projects as authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act, Public Law 110-343.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on November 3, 2010 from 12 to 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting location is U.S. Forest Service, Osceola Ranger District Office, 24874 U.S. Highway 90, Olustee, FL 32072.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Denise Rains, Public Services Staff Officer, 850-523-8568, e-mail                         *drains@fs.fed.us*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Florida's RAC consists of 15 people selected to serve on the committee by Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack. Members are from throughout the State and represent varied interests and areas of expertise. They will work collaboratively to improve working relationships among community members and national forest personnel.

Five Florida counties, Liberty, Wakulla, Columbia, Baker and Marion, elected to set aside a percentage of their Secure Rural Schools payment. Counties receive a payment annually for having National Forest lands within their boundaries. The RAC will ultimately review and recommend projects to be funded from this money.

Projects approved must benefit National Forests lands. Projects can maintain infrastructure, improve the health of watersheds and ecosystems, protect communities, and strengthen local economies.

Dated: October 5, 2010.

Teri Cleeland,

Deputy Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 2010-25603 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
584 A.2d 239

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STANLEY L. BELLAMY.

June 7, 1990.

This matter having come before the Court on defendant’s petition for certification that, in part, seeks review of so much of the judgment in A-4839-86 as affirms a sentence imposing on one occasion maximum consecutive terms for two robberies; and it appearing that the reasons for the consecutive features of the sentence were not “separately stated in the sentencing decision” in accordance with *State v. Yarbough,*100 *N.J.*627, 643, 498 A.2d 1239 (1985);

And it further appearing that the period of criminal behavior and successive terms for the robbery counts require particularized consideration in this case, a clear explanation of the sentence being an important element in our system of principled sentencing, *State v. Pillot,*115 *N.J.*558, 572, 560 A.2d 634 (1979);

It is ORDERED that certification is granted, limited to the sentencing issue, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Law Division for resentencing, with particular consideration of factors (3)(b) and (5) of *Yarbough*concerning the period of criminal behavior and the successive terms for the robbery counts to be accompanied by an explanation of the sentencing determination; and it is further

ORDERED that the petition for certification is, in all other respects, denied.
585 A.2d 395

#### HAROLD S. TWISS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, OFFICE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.

October 10, 1990.

Petition for certification granted. (See 239 *N.J.Super.*342, 571 A.2d 333)
| (logo) WELLS

             FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel: 410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation 

60 Wall Street

New York, NY 10005

 

 

RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent for the Southfield Town Center Loan Combination (in such capacities, “Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the “reporting period”):

 

 

 

(a)     A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the “Servicing Agreement(s)”) has been made under my supervision; and

 

(b)     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.

 

 

 

March 18, 2015

 

/s/ Brian Smith

Brian Smith

Vice President

 

 

 

To:  Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

 

Schedule A

 

 

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2014 by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor relating to the Series COMM 2014-UBS3 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, relating to the Southfield Town Center Loan Combination, a pari passu portion of which is included in the Series COMM 2014-CCRE18 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction. 

 

 

 

To:  Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

 

Schedule B

 

 

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

 

Not Applicable
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,999
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             237
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  3500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         80,255
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,877
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,110
<DEPOSITS>                                      87,123
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             16,345
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,287
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 136,110
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,321
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  181
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,502
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,162
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,173
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             3329
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,047
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 21,903
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,126
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      12,126
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,032
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.98
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.75
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,973
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,830
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,464
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,634
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,877
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,877
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert H. Barghaus, Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of Blyth, Inc., certify that:

 

1.      I have reviewed this quarterly reporton Form 10-Q of Blyth, Inc.;

 

2.      Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.      The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: September 4, 2008

 
|                                        |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/  Robert H. Barghaus                     |   |
| Robert  H. Barghaus                         |   |
| Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
#### STATE ex rel. Arthur Stephens CAMPBELL v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2009-KH-2436.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 29, 2010.

In re Campbell, Arthur Stephens; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 238,185; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,017-KH.

Denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0067

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL DEAN ALBERT,

Defendant and Appellant.

FILED

MAY 2 1 2021'

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

tate of Montana

ORDER

Self-represented Appellant Michael Dean Albert moves this Court, requesting that

the District Court produce the sentencing transcripts. Appellee State of Montana has not

filed a response.

In his motion, Albert requests a copy of his July 14, 2020 sentencing transcripts

from the Third Judicial District Court, Powell County. He states that these transcripts will

allow him "to prove his legal position which was denied by not allowing a hearing request

on February 2, 2021."

Albert appeals a February 2, 2021 Powell County District Court's denial of his

postjudgment motion for a hearing regarding clarification of his criminal sentences and

their calculation. The District Court Order concluded that Albert's sentences were run

correctly based on the record.

Albert's motion for his sentencing transcript cannot proceed with this Court. On

appeal, Albert challenges a written decision where the court held no hearing and therefore,

Albert is not required under the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure to provide a

transcript. Moreover, any request for a transcript of a prior hearing must be accompanied

with payment to the court reporter. Section 3-5-604, MCA; M. R. App. P. 8(3). Only filing

fees are waived for an incarcerated individual, such as Albert. M. R. App. P. 5(5). Albert

would have to pay the court reporter for a copy of his sentencing transcript to be part of the

record on appeal. Accordingly,

05/21/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0067
IT IS ORDERED that Albert's "Motion Requesting District Court Produce

Sentencing Transcripts" is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to

Michael Dean Albert personally.

tDATED this Z 1 —"day of May, 2021.

For the Court,

2

Chief Justice
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Austin DYER.

No. 2009-KP-2460.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 29, 2010.

In re Dyer, Austin; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. M, No. 98-4147; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-WR-629.

Denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6070

SHANE RANSOM, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA98-3217-S) Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 10, 1999 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shane Ransom, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General, AnnNorman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Shane Ransom seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Ransom v. Corcoran , No. CA98-3217-S (D. Md. Jan. 6, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer
of CV Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                         
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Dated: November 2, 2005 |  | /s/ DANIEL K. SPIEGELMAN
|                        |  | Daniel K. Spiegelman    
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
585 A.2d 340

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTHONY MAXWELL.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
857 A.2d 673

#### Robert J. BEAM, Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 12, 2004.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of July, 2004, probable jurisdiction is noted and the order appealed is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 757 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 757

 To increase the rates of pay under the statutory pay systems and for 
   prevailing rate employees by 3.2 percent, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2017

 Mr. Connolly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To increase the rates of pay under the statutory pay systems and for 
   prevailing rate employees by 3.2 percent, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Adjustment of Income Rates 
Act'' or the ``FAIR Act''.

SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENT TO RATES OF PAY.

    (a) Statutory Pay Systems.--For calendar year 2018, the percentage 
adjustment under section 5303 of title 5, United States Code, in the 
rates of basic pay under the statutory pay systems (as defined in 
section 5302 of title 5, United States Code) shall be 2 percent.
    (b) Prevailing Rate Employees.--Notwithstanding the wage survey 
requirements under section 5343(b) of title 5, United States Code, for 
fiscal year 2018, the rates of basic pay (as in effect on the last day 
of fiscal year 2017 under section 5343(a) of such title) for prevailing 
rate employees in each wage area and the rates of basic pay under 
sections 5348 and 5349 of such title shall be increased by 2 percent.

SEC. 3. ADJUSTMENT TO LOCALITY PAY.

    For calendar year 2018, the percentage adjustment under section 
5304 of title 5, United States Code, shall be an increase of 1.2 
percent.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**PDS GAMING CORPORATIONCERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of PDS Gaming Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Johan P. Finley,Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, and Peter D. Cleary,President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

1.      TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.
| By:    | /s/ Johan P.  Finley                               | Dated: | August 13, 2004 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------|
|   | Johan P. Finley                                    |   |                 |
| Title: | *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*             |   |                 |
| By:    | /s/ Peter D. Cleary                                | Dated: | August 13, 2004 |
|   | Peter D. Cleary                                    |   |                 |
| Title: | *President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer* |   |                 |

 

This certification is made solely for the purposes of18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard containedtherein, and not for any other purpose.

1

----
EXHIBIT 11


                           IPI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
                                                        August 31,          August 31,
                                                    ------------------   ----------------
                                                      1998      1997      1998      1997
                                                     ------    ------    ------    ------
<S>                                                  <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>   
Net Income                                           $  554    $  470    $1,499    $1,239

Weighted average number of issued shares
     outstanding                                      4,734     4,734     4,734     4,734

Shares used in computation of basic earnings
     per common stock                                 4,734     4,734     4,734     4,734
                                                     ======    ======    ======    ======

Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and
     stock warrants after application of treasury
     stock method                                        24         0        12         0
                                                     ------    ------    ------    ------

Common and common equivalent shares
     outstanding-diluted                              4,758     4,734     4,746     4,734
                                                     ======    ======    ======    ======

Basic earnings per common share                      $  .12    $  .10    $  .32    $  .26
                                                     ======    ======    ======    ======

Diluted earnings per common share                    $  .12    $  .10    $  .32    $  .26
                                                     ======    ======    ======    ======
</TABLE>


                                       12