alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Wei Shi, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Toyota Auto Receivables 2014-B Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.





March 25, 2015
By:  /s/ Wei ShiWei Shi

President

Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as Depositor

(Senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
585 A.2d 353

#### THERMOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSTICS, INC., ETC. v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY. THERMOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSTICS, INC., ETC. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., ETC.

July 17, 1990.

Petition for certification granted. (See 241 *N.J.Super.*88, 574 A.2d 485)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joveneto Monzello TINSLEY, a/k/a Jo Jo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-6812.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 30, 2000.

Decided Jan. 5, 2001.

Joveneto Monzello Tinsley, pro se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, SC, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Joveneto Monzello Tinsley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. Tinsley,*Nos. CR-98-111; CA-99-2882-10 (D.S.C. May 22, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
584 A.2d 215

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DONALD WRIGHT.

May 15, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
584 A.2d 250

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JORGE ZAMORANO.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Eugene JARROW v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0745.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 1, 2011.

In re Jarrow, Eugene; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. H, No. 383^494; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-0182.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; *State v. Parker,*98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1441 

KA 10-01434 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN F. KAMINSKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

MARY R. HUMPHREY, NEW HARTFORD, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Michael L.

Dwyer, J.), rendered November 5, 2008. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon a jury verdict, of burglary in the third degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury

verdict of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20),

defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his request to

charge the jury that a witness was an accomplice as a matter of law. 

We reject that contention. 

“An ‘accomplice’ means a witness in a criminal action who,

according to evidence adduced in such action, may reasonably be

considered to have participated in . . . [t]he offense charged[] or .

. . [a]n offense based upon the same or some of the same facts or

conduct [that] constitute the offense charged” (CPL 60.22 [2] [a],

[b]; see People v Berger, 52 NY2d 214, 219). “If the undisputed

evidence establishes that a witness is an accomplice, the jury must be

so instructed but, if different inferences may reasonably be drawn

from the proof regarding complicity, according to the statutory

definition, the question should be left to the jury for its

determination” (People v Basch, 36 NY2d 154, 157). Here, “different

inferences could reasonably be drawn regarding the witness’s

complicity in the [burglary]” (People v Marrero, 272 AD2d 77, 77-78,

lv denied 95 NY2d 855), and the court therefore properly submitted the

issue to the jury (see Basch, 36 NY2d at 157-158; People v Green, 225

AD2d 1077, lv denied 88 NY2d 879). In any event, even assuming,

arguendo, that the witness was an accomplice whose testimony required

corroboration, we conclude that her testimony was sufficiently

corroborated by other evidence tending to connect defendant with the

commission of the crime (see generally People v Reome, 15 NY3d 188,
-2- 1441 

KA 10-01434 

191-192; People v Breland, 83 NY2d 286, 292-293). 

Entered: December 30, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Targeted Genetics Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
      J. Poston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)          The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)          The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                August 6, 2008
            /s/David
                J. PostonDavid
                J. Poston
              Vice
                President, Finance and Chief Financial
                Officer
584 A.2d 218

#### ROBERT NOYE v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC.

May 15, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 238 *N.J.Super.*430, 570 A.2d 12)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,087,679
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              104,166,797
<ALLOWANCES>                               (2,098,502)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,701,454
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,398,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             112,584,462
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       16,031,812
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,775
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,591,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               112,584,462
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,334,031
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,566,045
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,388,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,635,629
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,035,216
<INCOME-TAX>                                   377,736
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   657,480
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25629]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Tetralogy of Fallot.
    Date: November 3, 2010.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Neelakanta Ravindranath, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 
Executive Blvd., Room 5B01G, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6889, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82f0e3f4ebece6f0ecc2efe3ebeeacecebeaace5edf4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="493b283f20272d3b27092428202567272021672e263f">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 5, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-25629 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Stephen SAMS v. LOUISIANA PAROLE BOARD.

No. 2011-C-0839.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2011.

In re Sams, Stephen; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 579-149; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1692.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 11


                           IPI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             Three Months Ended
                                                                          February 28,  February 29,
                                                                          --------------------------
                                                                              2001          2000
                                                                          --------------------------
<S>                                                                          <C>           <C>
Net Income                                                                   $4,180        $  166
                                                                             ======        ======

Weighted average number of issued shares outstanding                          4,859         4,810
                                                                             ======        ======

Shares used in computation of basic earnings per common stock                 4,859         4,810

Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and stock warrants after
     application of treasury stock method                                         0             0
                                                                             ------        ------

Common and common equivalent shares outstanding-diluted                       4,859         4,810
                                                                             ======        ======

Basic and diluted earnings per common share                                  $  .86        $  .03
                                                                             ======        ======
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       6,203,229
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,462,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                       1,734,130<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,399,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,634,509
<BONDS>                                     11,102,895
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,198
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,630,812
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,399,414
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,843,142
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,488,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0<F3>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                354,274
<INCOME-TAX>                                   131,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            223,274
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   223,274
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
<FN>
<F1> THE COMPANY DOES NOT PREPARE A CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
<F2> INCLUDES DEFERRED INCOME TAX ASSET OF $1.1 MILLION
<F3> AMOUNT, $678,000 IS INCLUDED IN TAG 29, "TOTAL COSTS"
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25772]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-806]


Silicon Metal From the People's Republic of China; Extension of 
Time Limit for the Final Results of the 2008-2009 Administrative Review 
of the Antidumping Duty Order

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: October 13, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Demitri Kalogeropoulos, or Keith 
Huffman, AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-
2623 and (202) 482-4987, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 29, 2009, the Department of Commerce (``Department'') 
initiated the administrative review (``AR'') of the antidumping duty 
order on silicon metal from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') 
for the period June 1, 2008, through May 31, 2009. See Initiation of 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Deferral 
of Administrative Review, 74 FR 37690 (July 29, 2009). On July 15, 
2010, the Department published its preliminary results. See Silicon 
Metal From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and 
Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 75 FR 41143 (July 15, 2010). The final results of this AR are 
currently due no later than November 12, 2010.

Extension of Time Limit for Final Results

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the 
Act''), requires the Department to issue the final results in an AR 
within 120 days after the date on which the preliminary results are 
published. However, if it is not practicable to complete the review 
within this time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 
Department to extend the time period to a maximum of 180 days.
    We determine that it is not practicable to complete the final 
results of this review within the original time limit because the 
Department requires additional time to analyze significant issues 
raised in the case briefs and rebuttal briefs. These issues include the 
calculation of surrogate financial ratios, the valuation of silica fume 
and coal, and questions regarding comparisons between U.S. prices and 
normal value. Therefore, given the complexity of issues in this case, 
we are extending the time limit for completion of the final results by 
60 days.
    An extension of 60 days from the current deadline of November 12, 
2010, would result in a new deadline of January 11, 2011.
    This notice is published pursuant to sections 751(a) and 777(i) of 
the Act.

     Dated: October 5, 2010.
Susan H. Kuhbach,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-25772 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7293 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

770 Ayrault Road in Fairport, New York, as the ‘‘Louise and Bob 

Slaughter Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2018 

Mr. MORELLE (for himself, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. SUOZZI, 

Miss RICE of New York, Mr. MEEKS, Ms. MENG, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. 

JEFFRIES, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. NADLER, Mr. DONOVAN, Mrs. 

CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. CROWLEY, 

Mr. SERRANO, Mr. ENGEL, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY

of New York, Mr. FASO, Mr. TONKO, Ms. STEFANIK, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. 

REED, Mr. KATKO, and Mr. HIGGINS of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 770 Ayrault Road in Fairport, New York, 

as the ‘‘Louise and Bob Slaughter Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LOUISE AND BOB SLAUGHTER POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 770 Ayrault Road in Fairport, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 7293 IH

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Louise 

2 and Bob Slaughter Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Louise and Bob 

7 Slaughter Post Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS