alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

  Certifications Required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned hereby certifies in his or her capacity as an officer of PennFed
Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in
such report.




                               By:  /s/ Joseph L. LaMonica
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Joseph L. LaMonica
                                    President and Chief
                                    Executive Officer

                                    Date: February 9, 2006


                               By:  /s/ Claire M. Chadwick
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Claire M. Chadwick
                                    Senior Executive Vice President,
                                    Chief Financial Officer and Controller

                                    Date: February 9, 2006


                                       32
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000921450
<NAME> THE QUANTUM GROUP, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         890,029
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,065,040
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     33,025
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,731,361
<PP&E>                                         248,151
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,519,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,459,680
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,400
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,016,015
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,519,062
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,699
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               374,667
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (303,968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (303,968)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (303,968)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-1999
<CASH>                                           2,684
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,546
<PP&E>                                          25,735
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,781
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,067
<SALES>                                        518,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               518,749
<CGS>                                          458,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  458,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (24)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,755)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (4,744)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9,011)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,011)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.72)


</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7344 

To reauthorize tuition assistance programs under the District of Columbia 

College Access Act of 1999. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2018 

Mr. MEADOWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To reauthorize tuition assistance programs under the District 

of Columbia College Access Act of 1999. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF TUITION ASSISTANCE 

4 PROGRAMS. 

5 (a) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 7 of the District of 

6 Columbia College Access Act of 1999 (sec. 38–2706, D.C. 

7 Official Code) is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 7. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

9 ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to the Dis10 trict of Columbia to carry out section 3 and section 5 an 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7344 IH

1 aggregate amount of $40,000,000 for each of the fiscal 

2 years 2019 through 2023. Such funds shall remain avail3 able until expended.’’. 

4 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT RELATING TO RE5 DUCTIONS IN AMOUNTS FOR INSUFFICIENT APPROPRIA6 TIONS.— 

7 (1) PUBLIC SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 

8 3(b)(1) of such Act (sec. 38–2702(b)(1), D.C. Offi9 cial Code) is amended by striking ‘‘If the funds’’ and 

10 all that follows through ‘‘are insufficient’’ and in11 serting ‘‘If the funds appropriated pursuant to sec12 tion 7 are insufficient’’. 

13 (2) PRIVATE SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 

14 5(b)(1) of such Act (sec. 38–2704(b)(1), D.C. Offi15 cial Code) is amended by striking ‘‘If the funds’’ and 

16 all that follows through ‘‘are insufficient’’ and in17 serting ‘‘If the funds appropriated pursuant to sec18 tion 7 are insufficient’’. 

19 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT RELATING TO EX20 PIRED AUTHORIZATIONS.— 

21 (1) PUBLIC SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 3 of 

22 such Act (sec. 38–2702, D.C. Official Code) is 

23 amended by striking subsection (i). 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7344 IH

1 (2) PRIVATE SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 5 of 

2 such Act (sec. 38–2704, D.C. Official Code) is 

3 amended by striking subsection (f). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
#### Andrew FERNALD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D10-2482.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Oct. 22, 2010.

Andrew Fernald, Royal Palm Beach, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence in case no. 05-2006-CF-064818-AXXX, in the Circuit Court in and for Brevard County, Florida. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      16,641,090
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         378,033
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,550,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 17,317,526
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    117,452,261
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,296,794
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             161,772,263
<DEPOSITS>                                 141,560,814
<SHORT-TERM>                                 7,560,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,574,428
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,329,495
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,747,526
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             161,772,263
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,768,281
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              281,929
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,050,210
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             784,915
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             857,139
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,193,071
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   57,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (2,188)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,668,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                802,690
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     506,103
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   506,103
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.42
<LOANS-NON>                                    774,964
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               195,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,241,016
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    9,318
<RECOVERIES>                                     8,096
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               57,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,296,794
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
No. 87-1064.

#### United States *v.*Stuart et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.
#### Ana and Ermes AGUILERA, Appellants, v. EQUITY ONE, LLC, Appellee.

No. 3D09-3308.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 20, 2011.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 2, 2011.

*1174Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, Kacey Bennett, Irene Porter and Shannon Kain, Miami, for appellants.

Cole Scott & Kissane and Scott A. Cole, Miami, Erin K. Loeb and John S. Penton, Jr., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Before CORTIÑAS and LAGOA, JJ„ and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Mrs. Aguilera, a nurse’s aide who was injured in a fall-down accident on appellee-defendant’s premises, and her husband appeal from a judgment in their favor, pursuant to a jury verdict containing awards for several elements of damage, but which found her 90% and defendant 10% liable. Of the several issues presented, we find error only in the trial court’s failure to grant a new trial on the issues of her loss of future earnings and her husband’s alleged loss of consortium after the jury returned a verdict as to those items for zero damages. As to these elements, the evidence is uncontradicted that at least some damages were sustained as a result of the severe injuries sustained to the wife’s right shoulder and arm. See *Peterson v. Sun State Int’l Trucks, LLC,*56 So.3d 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (where husband of plaintiff presented substantial, undisputed evidence sufficient to require an award of at least nominal damages, a zero verdict for loss of consortium claim was inadequate); *Big Lots Stores, Inc. v. de Diaz,*18 So.3d 1065, 1068 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (finding that undisputed evidence presented on plaintiffs loss of consortium claim was sufficient to “require an award of at least nominal damages”); *Tavakoly v. Fiddlers Green Ranch of Fla., Inc.,*998 So.2d 1183, 1185 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (“[I]t is ... well settled that where sufficient undisputed evidence is presented on a consortium claim that would require an award of at least nominal damages, a zero verdict is inadequate as a matter of law.”); *Watson v. Builders Square, Inc.,*563 So.2d 721, 722 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (where appellants proved that Mrs. Watson suffered a permanent injury which affected her ability to work, a zero verdict for loss of future earning capacity was inadequate).

We reject, however, the same contention as to the zero award for future medical expenses. See *Smith v. Fla. Healthy Kids Corp.,*27 So.3d 692, 694 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“It is not necessary to grant a new trial in all cases where the jury returns a zero verdict. In fact, where conflicting *1175evidence exists concerning damages and reasonable men could believe that the plaintiff sustained no damage, a zero verdict will be upheld.”) (quoting *Surety Mortg., Inc. v. Equitable Mortg. Res., Inc.,*534 So.2d 780, 781 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)); *Truelove v. Blount,*954 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Accordingly, the judgment below is for the most part affirmed and the cause remanded for a new trial as to the issues of the wife’s loss of future earnings and the husband’s loss of consortium, as to which the jury awards will be reduced by 90% comparative negligence.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
Exhibit 99.2 

HMN FINANCIAL, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HMN Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy P. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

Date:  8/13/2002                                              /s/ Timothy P. Johnson
Timothy P. Johnson, 

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
** 

M1:901996.01**
(logo)**Prudential**

**PrudentialAsset Resources**

PGIMReal Estate Finance

2100Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel214-777-4500

 

Abusiness of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association

CommercialMortgage Servicing

MACD1086

550South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte,North Carolina 28202

Attention:Asset Manager

 

 

RE:         **RBS 2014-C21**

Period: **January 1, 2018 to December 31,2018(the "Reporting Period")**

 

 

**Annual ComplianceStatement**

 

I, Joni Brown-Haas, in my capacity asPresident and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the"Company") hereby certify with regard to the Company's role asSub-Servicer under the Sub-Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement")dated as of August 1, 2014, pertaining to the above-referenced certificates,that:

 

       (i)           areview of the activities of the Company under the Agreement  during theperiod noted above, and  of the performance of the Company under theAgreement during the  relevant  period  has been made under mysupervision, and

 

     (ii)           to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement throughout the relevant period, and

 

   (iii)           to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled itsobligations under its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects, and

 

    (iv)           theCompany has maintained an effective internal control system over the servicingof mortgage loans including the Loans serviced by the Company, and

 

     (v)           theCompany has not received any notice regarding qualification or challenging thestatus of the Lower Tier REMIC or the Upper Tier REMIC as a REMIC, from the IRSor any other governmental agency or body.

 

Effectiveas of February 22, 2019

 

 

/s/Joni Brown-Haas

JoniBrown-Haas

Presidentand Managing Director

PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc.
#### Shuber & Hochstadter v. S. A. Holcomb et al.

(No. 2979.)

Appeal from Denton County.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 224. *Conclusions of fact and law; refusal of trial judge to file, in the record, is reversible error, when.*This case involves many questions of law and fact, and the record is voluminous. It was tried by the judge without a jury. At the conclusion of the trial, appellants requested the judge to prepare and file in the record a statement in writing of his conclusions of fact and *173law, as provided by the statute. The judge failed to comply with this request, assigning as a reason for such failure that there were other cases set for trial at that term of his court, and that he did not have time to prepare said statement. Appellants excepted to his refusal to prepare and file said statement. *Held:*Article 1333 of the Revised Statutes provides: “And upon a trial by the court, the judge shall, at the request of either of the parties, also state in writing the conclusions of fact found by him, separately from the conclusions of law; which conclusions of fact and law shall be filed with the clerk, and shall constitute a part of the record. ” Either party is expressly given the right to have the conclusions of fact found by the judge, as well as the conclusions of law, stated in writing separately. This must be requested, which, in this case, is most clearly shown to have been done. That other cases had been set for that term, and that but one day of the term remained, certainly should not be permitted to operate a denial to the party of a right given him by the statute. The trial, and all that pertains to the trial of this case, should have been completed, if necessary, to award the parties their full rights, before any other- cause was called. If but one day of the term remained, and it required this day to state in writing the conclusions of fact and law, this should have been done to the’ exclusion of other unreached business. The trial judge, being requested by appellants, and having refused to state in writing his conclusions of fact and law, they were denied a right expressly given by law, *for*which the judgment must be reversed. Such error, however, will not, in all cases, work a reversal. There may be cases so simple and clear, both as to fact and law, wherein a denial of this right could not possibly injure the party requesting it, and would not therefore be sufficient ground for reversal.

May 31, 1884.

Reversed and remanded.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0544

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

CHRISTOPHER LEIGH CANAL-HUGHES,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 9, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 5 2024

08/05/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0544
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 195 (Friday, October 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25385]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than October 25, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Nadine Wallman, Vice 
President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. Clay P. Graham, individually, and with Bryan H. Graham, both of 
Zanesville, Ohio, and the Estate of James F. Graham, Zanesville, Ohio, 
acting in concert; to acquire voting shares of North Valley Bancshares, 
Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares and control of the 
North Valley Bank, both of Zanesville, Ohio.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 5, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-25385 Filed 10-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### Roxane MONTGOMERY v. C & C SELF ENTERPRISES, INC.

No. 2011-C-0873.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2011.

In re Montgomery, Roxanne; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 2003-001726; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-705.

Denied.