alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Valentine HOWELL and Loretta B. Howell, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 14751.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 18, 1964.

Decided May 26, 1964.

Carl F. Bauersfeld, Washington, D. C. (Robert Ash, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for petitioners.

Timothy B. Dyk, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Robert F. Kennedy, Atty. Gen., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Robert N. Anderson, Morton K. Rothschild, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before HASTIE, GANEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this ease the Tax Court disallowed a deduction claimed by the petitioners on account of losses sustained by a theatrical agency, a partnership of the petitioner Valentine Howell and Miriam Howell Warren, his second cousin and sister-in-law. This decision was predicated upon a finding by the Tax Court that the taxpayer became a principal in the ill-fated partnership to help his relative and not primarily with a view to earning a profit through investing in a commercial venture.

 We have recently pointed out that it “is the function of the Tax Court to weigh the evidence, draw the inferences of which the evidence is reasonably susceptible, and, if necessary, resolve conflicting inferences”, and that the “decision of the Tax Court, based upon its findings of fact, is conclusive unless it appears from an examination of the rec*429ord that the findings of fact were clearly erroneous”. Carpenter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 3 Cir., 1963, 322 F.2d 733, 736. Having considered the entire record that was before the Tax Court, we are unable to say that its finding as to the primary purpose of the taxpayer Valentine Howell’s venture was clearly erroneous.

Accordingly, the decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.
**Exhibit** **32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

I, David M. Bronson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended July 1, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ David M. Bronson

David M. Bronson

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

August 8, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE RELATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,991
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,902
<PP&E>                                          64,244
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,128)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,651
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,453
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,291
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,052)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,651
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,589
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (40)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (727)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,198
<INCOME-TAX>                                        42
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,156
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,156
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of ReWalk Robotics Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Larry Jasinski, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




●   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and●   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company




/s/ Larry JasinskiLarry JasinskiChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)





Date: February 27, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1298 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1298

 To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require persons 
  conducting Federal election polls by telephone to disclose certain 
    information to respondents and the Federal Election Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2007

  Mr. Petri (for himself, Mrs. Maloney of New York, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. 
   Kind, Mr. Shays, Mr. Holden, and Mr. Fortenberry) introduced the 
     following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require persons 
  conducting Federal election polls by telephone to disclose certain 
    information to respondents and the Federal Election Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Push Poll Disclosure Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE AND REPORTS RELATING TO POLLING BY TELEPHONE OR 
              ELECTRONIC DEVICE.

    (a) In General.--Title III of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 
1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new section:

``disclosure and reports relating to polling by telephone or electronic 
                                 device

    ``Sec. 325.  (a) Disclosure to Respondents.--Any person who 
conducts a Federal election poll by telephone or electronic device 
shall disclose to each respondent the identity of the person paying the 
expenses of the poll. The disclosure shall be made at the end of the 
interview involved.
    ``(b) Reports to Commission.--In the case of any Federal election 
poll by telephone or electronic device--
            ``(1) if the results are not to be made public, the person 
        who conducts the poll shall report to the Commission the total 
        cost of the poll and all sources of funds for the poll; and
            ``(2) the person who conducts the poll shall report to the 
        Commission the total number of households contacted and include 
        with such report a copy of the poll questions.
    ``(c) Federal Election Poll Defined.--As used in this section, the 
term `Federal election poll' means a survey--
            ``(1) in which the respondent is asked to state opinions or 
        views regarding a future election for Federal office; and
            ``(2) in which more than 1,200 households are surveyed.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to elections occurring after December 31, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

NICHOLAS AND TERESA BENTIVEGNA,

Petitioners

v.

HAMPTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL 

DISTRICT, HAMPTON TOWNSHIP, 

ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ALLEGHENY 

COUNTY BOARD OF ASSESSMENT 

APPEALS AND REVIEW,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 82 WM 2023

NICHOLAS AND TERESA BENTIVEGNA,

Petitioners

v.

HAMPTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL 

DISTRICT, HAMPTON TOWNSHIP, 

ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ALLEGHENY 

COUNTY BOARD OF ASSESSMENT 

APPEALS AND REVIEW,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 83 WM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2

nd day of May, 2024, the Application for Extraordinary Relief is 

DENIED.
No. 74-6065.

No. 75-5844.

No. 75-6067.

No. 75-6123.

#### Selman *v.*Louisiana, Roberts *v.*Louisiana, Watts *v.*Louisiana, Washington *v.*Louisiana,

428 U. S. 906;

428 U. S. 325;

428 U. S. 906; and

428 U. S. 906. Petition for rehearing denied.
#### Walter CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D10-1034.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 26, 2011.

Rehearing Denied March 14, 2011.

Walter Clark, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. Appellant claimed that his prior offenses for which the court withheld adjudication of guilt and placed him on probation do not qualify as predicate offenses for habitual felony offender (HFO) sentencing. Appellant is wrong. At the time appellant committed the offense for which he received the HFO sentence, the relevant section of the HFO statute provided: “For the purposes of this section, the placing of a person on probation or community control without an adjudication of guilt shall be treated as a prior conviction.” § 775.084(2), Fla. Stat. (2000); *see also*ch. 99-188, § 3, Laws of Fla. (effective July 1, 1999).

*Affirmed.*

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bobby D. HIGGINBOTHAM.

No. 2010-KK-2499.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 17, 2010.

In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Tensas, 6th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 79,152; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,-101-KW..

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 710 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 710

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to better align 
     the grace period required for non-payment of premiums before 
  discontinuing coverage under qualified health plans with such grace 
                 periods provided for under State law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2017

  Mr. Flores introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to better align 
     the grace period required for non-payment of premiums before 
  discontinuing coverage under qualified health plans with such grace 
                 periods provided for under State law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health Coverage State Flexibility 
Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. ALIGNING QUALIFIED HEALTH PLAN GRACE PERIOD REQUIREMENTS WITH 
              STATE LAW GRACE PERIOD REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 1412(c)(2) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
Act (42 U.S.C. 18082(c)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B)(iv)(II), by striking ``a 3-month 
        grace period'' and inserting ``a grace period specified in 
        subparagraph (C)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Grace period specified.--For purposes of 
                subparagraph (B)(iv)(II), the grace period specified in 
                this subparagraph is--
                            ``(i) for plan years beginning before 
                        January 1, 2018, a 3-month grace period; and
                            ``(ii) for plan years beginning during 2018 
                        or a subsequent year, such grace period for 
                        non-payment of premiums before discontinuing 
                        coverage as is applicable under the State law 
                        of the State in which the Exchange operates to 
                        health insurance coverage offered in the 
                        individual market (or, in the case such a State 
                        law is not in place for the State involved, a 
                        1-month grace period).''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 15.1

Zurich, 13 March 2015

Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in each of the following registration statements:



| | (1) | on Form F-3 (Registration Number 333-200212) of UBS AG, and each related prospectus currently outstanding under such registration statement,
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | on Form S-8 (Registration Numbers 333-200634; 333-200635; 333-200641; and 333-200665) of UBS Group AG, and each related prospectus currently outstanding under any of the aforementioned registration statements,
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | the base prospectus of Corporate Asset Backed Corporation (CABCO) dated 23 June 2004 (Registration Number 333-111572),
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | the Form 8-K of CABCO dated 23 June 2004 (SEC File Number 001-13444), and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (5) | the Prospectus Supplements relating to the CABCO Series 2004-101 Trust dated 10 May 2004 (Registration Number 033-91744) and 13 May 2004 (Registration Number 033-91744-05),
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated 5 March 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of UBS Group AG and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of UBS Group AG, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended 31 December 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                      |  |                                   
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|Ernst & Young Ltd     |  |                                   
|                      | 
|/s/ Jonathan Bourne   |  | /s/ Troy J. Butner                
|                      | 
|Jonathan Bourne       |  | Troy J. Butner                    
|Licensed Audit Expert |  | Certified Public Accountant (U.S.)
Exhibit 12.2





Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act





I, Lior Torem, certify that:





1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Check-Cap Ltd.;





2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.    The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:





a.     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b.      Intentionally Omitted;





c.      Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





d.      Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.     The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a.      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b.      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date: April 29, 2015





By:
/s/ Lior ToremName:
Lior ToremTitle:
Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer

and Principal Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2557]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel Training.
    Date: March 1, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Peter Kozel, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
NCCAM, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892-5475, 
301-496-8004, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c8a3a7b2ada4b888a5a9a1a4e6a6a1a0e6afa7be"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c67637669607c4c616d656022626564226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, 
Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 29, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-2557 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7361 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7361

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow exclusion of gain 
          or loss on like-kind exchanges of virtual currency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2018

   Mr. Budd introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow exclusion of gain 
          or loss on like-kind exchanges of virtual currency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FOR LIKE-KIND EXCHANGES OF VIRTUAL CURRENCY.

    (a) In General.--Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Special Rule for Virtual Currency.--For purposes of this 
section, the exchange of virtual currency for virtual currency of like 
kind shall be treated in the same manner as the exchange of real 
property for real property of like kind.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to exchanges completed after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```