alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 27, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-27-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-27-1999
<CASH>                                          15,847
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                       237
<INVENTORY>                                      8,699
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,332
<PP&E>                                         111,932
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,587
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,885
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,986
<SALES>                                         69,980
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,980
<CGS>                                           57,741
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,002
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,656
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,230
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

OWOSSO CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Three Months Ended                 Nine Months Ended
                                                                --------------------------        --------------------------
                                                                 August 1,       July 26,          August 1,       July 26,
                                                                   1999           1998               1999           1998
<S>                                                              <C>            <C>                <C>             <C>
BASIC:
Net income (loss) available for common stockholders             $ 779,000       $(606,000)        $1,402,000       $ 805,000
                                                                ---------       ---------         ----------       ---------
Weighted average number
    of common shares outstanding                                5,830,000       5,815,000          5,824,000       5,812,000
                                                                ---------       ---------         ----------       ---------
Basic earnings (loss) per common share                             $ 0.13         $ (0.10)            $ 0.24          $ 0.14
                                                                ---------       ---------         ----------       ---------
DILUTED:
Net income (loss) available for common stockholders             $ 779,000       $(606,000)        $1,402,000       $ 805,000
                                                                ---------       ---------         ----------       ---------
Weighted average number
    of common shares outstanding                                5,830,000       5,815,000          5,824,000       5,812,000
Dilutive effect of stock options                                   38,000               -             29,000          20,000
                                                                ---------       ---------         ----------       ---------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding                   5,868,000       5,815,000          5,853,000       5,832,000
                                                                ---------       ---------         ----------       ---------
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share                           $ 0.13         $ (0.10)            $ 0.24          $ 0.14
                                                                ---------       ---------         ----------       ---------
</TABLE>
584 A.2d 224

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. C.W.

May 21, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 10.4

Convertible Promissory Note Amendment No. 1

This Convertible Promissory Note Amendment
No. 1 (the First Amendment to Note) is entered into as of June 12, 2007 (the Amendment Date) by and between PTC Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (PTC), and CV Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (CVT), for the purpose of amending the Convertible Promissory Note between the same parties dated June 7, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the Convertible Note), with reference to the following facts and
circumstances.

WHEREAS, PTC and CVT entered into the Convertible Note in connection
with the Collaboration and License Agreement (the Collaboration Agreement) dated as of June 7th, 2006; and

WHEREAS, the parties now wish to amend the terms of Convertible Note as set forth in this First Amendment to Note;

NOW, THEREFORE, IN consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

A. CVT Representations. Each Party represents and warrants that as
of the Amendment Date it has not assigned or otherwise pledged the Convertible Note and that is has the full power and authority to enter into this First Amendment to Note.

B. Amendment to Convertible Note. Section 1.7 of the Convertible Note is amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

1.7 Maturity Date means January 31, 2011.

C. Remainder Unchanged. Except as expressly
amended by this First Amendment to Note, the Convertible Note shall be unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect and in accordance with its terms. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this First Amendment to Note and the terms
of the Convertible Note, the terms of this First Amendment to Note shall govern.



1



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to Note to be executed by their
duly authorized officers as of the first date set forth above.



|                       |  |                   |  |                       |  |        |  |                                
|---------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------
|PTC Therapeutics, Inc. |  |                   |  | CV Therapeutics, Inc.
|                       |  |                   |  |                      
|By:                    |  | /s/ STUART PELTZ  |  |                       |  | By:    |  | /s/ LOUIS G. LANGE, M.D., PH.D.
|Title:                 |  | President and CEO |  |                       |  | Title: |  | CEO and Chairman of the Board  



2
| (logo) WELLS           FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

 

MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. 

383 Madison Avenue 31st Floor, 

New York, NY 10179

 

RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator for The Shops at Wiregrass Loan Combination (in such capacities, “Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014  (the “reporting period”):

 

 

(a)     A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the “Servicing Agreement(s)”) has been made under my supervision; and

 

(b)     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.

 

 

 

March 20, 2015

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

Brian Smith

Vice President

 

 

 

 

 

 

To:  J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

Schedule A

 

 

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2014, by and among J.P. MORGAN CHASE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., as Depositor, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and Trustee, and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor, relating to the series JPM 2014-C18 relating to The Shops at Wiregrass Loan Combination, a  pari passu portion of which is included in the series JPM 2014-C21 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To:  J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

Schedule B

 

 

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

 

Not Applicable
EXHIBIT
32.1





HERITAGE
OAKS BANCORP




Quarterly
report on Form 10Q


for the
quarter ended June 30, 2010




CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The
undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the
“Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that to my
knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2010, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies
with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:  August
      9, 2010
                    /s/ Lawrence P.
      WardLawrence
      P. Ward,President
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Heritage Oaks Bancorp, and will be retained
by Heritage Oaks Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Margaret A. Torres, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Heritage Oaks Bancorp;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
 to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b) Intentionally Left Blank
 
 c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);
 
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date: April 23, 2004
 /s/ Margaret A. Torres
 Margaret A. Torres
 Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,310
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,076
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,505
<INVENTORY>                                      7,421
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,557
<PP&E>                                           1,785
<DEPRECIATION>                                     829
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,608
<BONDS>                                         95,794
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,894
<SALES>                                          9,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,134
<CGS>                                            9,159
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   315
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (728)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (277)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (451)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (451)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)


</TABLE>
584 A.2d 248

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PATRICK KURSCICS.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 99.2

PDS GAMING CORPORATION PLANS VIGOROUS  DEFENSE AGAINST SHAREHOLDER COMPLAINT

LAS
VEGAS, NVMay 12, 2003PDS Gaming Corporation (NasdaqSC: PDSG) today announced that it has been named as a defendant in a purported class action lawsuit filed by a
shareholder in District Court, Clark County, Nevada. The complaint alleges that members of the Company's Board of Directors violated their fiduciary duties in approving a letter of intent with respect
to a proposal submitted by a management group to acquire shares of common stock of the Company as announced in the Company's press releases dated February 24, 2003 and February 26, 2003.

The
Company believes the allegations are without merit and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

A
special committee of the Company's Board of Directors, consisting of its independent directors, and the management group continue to negotiate towards a definitive agreement. The proposal is subject
to, among other things, the execution of a definitive agreement, approval by a committee of the Company's independent directors and by a majority of the Company's shares not owned by the management
group, the procuring of all necessary consents of the Company's commercial lenders and the trustees under the indentures covering the Company's outstanding debt securities, the securing of required
approvals from all gaming regulatory agencies, the obtaining of the necessary financing, and the receipt by the Company of a favorable fairness opinion from an investment bank.

For
additional information, please contact:

Peter
D. Cleary
President and Chief Operating Officer
PDS Gaming Corporation
6171 McLeod Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89120
(702) 736-0700

---

QuickLinks
585 A.2d 364

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EUGENE ANDERSON.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Willie Dan ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D10-4807.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 10, 2011.

*878James T. Miller, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Willie Dan Roberts, seeks review of the trial court’s summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant was convicted of burglary of an occupied structure and grand theft. The basis for the burglary conviction was that Appellant broke a window display case from the outside of a jewelry store while the store was open for business and was occupied by the store owner. In his motion, Appellant alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to preserve the issue of whether the area burglarized by Appellant was an occupied structure. Appellant argued that the display case, and not the jewelry store, was the relevant “structure,” which must have been occupied at the time of the burglary to support his conviction. The trial court summarily denied Appellant’s motion, finding that the display case was too small to be occupied or unoccupied and that Appellant’s counsel would never have made that argument. We find that the trial court erred in determining that counsel would never make the proposed argument.

Appellant alleged that defense counsel moved for judgment of acquittal on the burglary charge on the basis that the business was open to the public; thus, Appellant could not be guilty of burglary of an occupied structure. *See*§ 810.02(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2007) (defining burglary as “entering a dwelling, a structure, or a conveyance with the intent to commit an offense therein, unless the premises are at the time open to the public....”). Appellant also alleged that the State argued in rebuttal that the display case itself was not open to the public and that the trial court denied the original motion. Thus, contrary to the postconviction court’s assertion, it would have been reasonable for defense counsel to argue that the display case was not open to the public. *See Knight v. State,*983 So.2d 64, 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); *Davis v. State,*988 So.2d 1125, 1126; *Dakes v. State,*545 So.2d 939, 940 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); *see also Colbert v. State,*49 So.3d 819, 821-22 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); *Collett v. State,*676 So.2d 1046, 1047 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s summary denial of Appellant’s postconviction motion, and remand *879for either attachment of those portions of the record conclusively showing that Appellant is entitled to no relief, or for an evidentiary hearing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

WOLF, DAVIS, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Kootenai National Forest's Lincoln County Resource Advisory Committee will meet on Wednesday, October 13, 2010 at 6 p.m. at the Forest Supervisor's Office in Libby, Montana for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

October 13, 2010.

# ADDRESSES:

Forest Supervisor's Office, 31374 U.S. Hwy 2, Libby, Montana.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Janette Turk, Committee Coordinator, Kootenai National Forest at (406) 283-7764, or e-mail                         *jturk@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda will include review of 2010 project proposals and 2008-09 project status. If the meeting date or location is changed, notice will be posted in the local newspapers, including the Daily Interlake based in Kalispell, Montana.

Dated: October 1, 2010.

Paul Bradford,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 2010-25396 Filed 10-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
#### TRANSWORLD MARITIME SERVICES, INC. v. NOLA SHIPSTORES, INC.

No. 2012-CC-0580.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Nola Shipstores, Inc.; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedí*1275al Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. P, No. 700-341; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 12-C-75.

Denied.
585 A.2d 350

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAVID WOMBLE.

July 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.