alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CATRIONA GRACE WHALEN
, Appellant,

v.

WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP, INC.
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1945

[ November 10, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Jeffrey R. Levenson , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE18

- 029774

.

Philip D. Parrish of Philip D. Parrish, P.A., Miami, and David J. Gillis of Law Offices of David J. Gillis, Fort L auderdale, for appellant.

Charles M

- P "Chip" George of Law Offices of Charles M

- P George, Coral Gables, and Derek H. Lloyd and Anthony J. Renaldo of Chartwell Law, Deerfield Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN
, A RTAU
, JJ., and H ARPER
, B R ADLEY
, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 16, 2020

No. 04-19-00812-CV

Ken KINSEY,

Appellant

v.

AL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI22581

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After receiving a thirty-day extension, appellee’s brief was due to be filed March 12, 

2020. Appellee has filed an unopposed motion requesting an additional ten-day extension of time 

to file appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that appellee’s brief is due no 

later than March 23, 2020.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
# TheAttorney General ofTexas

December 6, 1977 JOHN L.HILL Attorney General

Honorable Gibson D. Lewis Opinion No. H-1100

Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs Re: Election of chairman House of Representatives of the Texas Historical Austini Texas 76111 Commission.
Dear Representative Lewis:
You have requested our opinion regarding the election of a chairman of theTexas Historical Commission. Article 6145,V.T.C.S., provides, in section 3:

The Commission shall hold regular meetings inJanuary, April, July, and October of each year. On the first scheduled meeting after the effective date of this Act, theCommission shall select a chairman, vice-chairman, and secretary from itsmembers, who shall serve until the January 1975meeting and thereafter the Commission shall select a chairman, vicechairman, and secretary from itsmembership at each January meeting inodd numbered years. TheCommission may hold such othermeetings at such other times and places as shall be scheduled by it in formal sessions and as shallbe called by the chairman of the Commission. The Commission shall have authority topromulgate such rules and regulations as it shall deem proper for the effective administration of theprovisions of this Act. You state that the chairman selected inJanuary, 1977, died shortly thereafter. The vice-chairman then became acting chairman, but theCommission subsequently held a special election to fill thevacancy, and selected another individual as chairman. You askwhether itwas authorized todo so.

P. 4512Honorable Gibson D. Lewis -page 2 (H-1100)

Although it is specifically empowered to select officers only inJanuary of odd-numbered years, article 6145 also authorizes theCommission "topromulgate such rules and regulations as it shall deem proper for the effective administration of theprovisions of thisAct." InAttorney General Opinion H-955 (1977)at 4,we held that, "absent legislative direction," the Texas Youth Council could "reduce the term of its chairman, and restrict the number of successive terms an individual may ,erve as chairman." (Emphasis in original). Article 6145 likewise does not address the question ofvacancies among officers. In our opinion, the absence of legislative direction regarding this contingency, when considered together with the rule-making power of theCommission, furnishes sufficient basis for the Commission topromulgate a regulation providing for a special election to fill theunexpired term of an officer.
In our view, such a rulemay bemade applicable to the term of thepresent chairman. Attorney General Opinion H-955 (1977). In the absence of such a rule, however, we believe that thevice-chairman should continue to serve as acting chairman. SUMMARY

The Texas Historical Commission may promulgate a rule providing for a special election to fill avacancy in the office of chairman, andmaymake it applicable to the term of the present chairman. In the absence of such a rule, thevice-chairman should serve as acting chairman.

OHN L. HILL General of Texas

Opinion Committee jst

P. 4513
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1708]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) in December 2008 (74 FR 1170, 01/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of general-purpose zones;                

*Whereas,*                     the Ellis County Trade Zone Corporation, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 113, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket 4-2010, filed 01/14/10) for authority to reorganize under the ASF with a service area of Ellis County, Texas, adjacent to the Dallas/Fort Worth Customs and Border Protection port of entry, and FTZ 113's existing Site 1 would be categorized as a magnet site;                

*Whereas,*                     notice inviting public comment was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (75 FR 3705, 01/22/10; 75 FR 17125, 04/05/10) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;                

*Now, therefore,*                     the Board hereby orders:                

The application to reorganize FTZ 113 under the alternative site framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, and to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone project.

Signed at Washington, DC, September 24, 2010.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

*Attest:*

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010-25222 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1998
<CASH>                                           2,305
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,095
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,624
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,945
<PP&E>                                          13,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,368
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,872
<SALES>                                        133,007
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,007
<CGS>                                          118,487
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,487
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   126
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 428
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    665
<INCOME-TAX>                                       211
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                454
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       454
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
Order entered November 25, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01206-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF ROBERTO REFUGIO DE JESUS GONZALEZ BARRERA

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-15-02268-1

ORDER

The reporter’s record is overdue. By letter dated November 7, 2019, the court reporter 

informed the Court that no hearings were conducted in the underlying proceeding. Accordingly, 

we ORDER appellant to file her brief on the merits within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### Standridge *v.*State.

Opinion delivered July 13, 1925.

1. Criminal law — sufficiency of confession. — Proof of confession of the accused, accompanied with proof of commission of the , offense by -some one, warrants a conviction.

2. Intoxicating liquors' — unlawful sale — evidence.—Evidence . *held*to sustain a conviction of the unlawful sale of whiskey.

Appeal from Pope Circuit Court; *J. T. Bulloch,*Judge;

affirmed.

*Joe D. Shepherd,*for appellant.

*H. W. Applegate,*Attorney General, and *John L. Carter,*Assistant, for appellee.

McCulloch, C. J.

This,is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of' the offense of selling intoxicating liquor, and the sole contention here is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict.

The officer who arrested, appellant testified that he gave a man named Freeman .a marked $5.00 bill with instructions'to purchase whiskey; that he followed Freeman in a car, about ten minutes behind; that when he got near the top -of a certain hill, Freeman returned up the road with a half-gallon of whiskey, and that when‘he went 'to the top of the hill he (witness) saw appellant and a boy down the road a short distance in the direction from which Freeman had come, and that be thereupon arrested appellant and found the marked bill in appéllánt’s possession. The witness testified that he identified the bill by the marks he had placed on it, as 'well as1 by its serial number, a memorandum of *295which he had kept when he turned the bill over to Freeman. ■ '

Freeman did not testify in the case. , Two witnesses testified to a voluntary confession made. by appellant.

Proof of confession of the accused, accompanied,by proof of the commission of the offense by isome person, is legally sufficient to sustain a conviction. *Melton*v. *State,*43 Ark. 367.

The circumstances proved in this case were sufficient to warrant the inference that whiskey was sold on the occasion mentioned by the witnesses, and, even if that were not sufficient to fully connect- appellant with the sale, his own confession supplies the omission and completes the case against him as to the legal sufficiency of the evidence.

Affirmed.
Order entered December 10, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00832
- CR
BRANDON DAMOND WOODS , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 36 6th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366
- 81312
- 2018



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s December 6, 2019 second motion for extension of time to
file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due on or before January 6, 2020. The failure to file a brief by that date may result in the appeal being abated for a hearing.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(b)(3).

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
Exhibit 12.1

Certification by the Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Yan Tang, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Momo Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [intentionally omitted];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal
control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                                                           
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 20, 2015
|                     | 
|By:                  |  | /s/ Yan Tang                                              
|                     |  | Name: Yan Tang Title:
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.4

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 906**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terry L. Stevens, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the Operating Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ TERRYL.STEVENS                                                                       |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Terry L. StevensSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner |   |
| May 8, 2009                                                                    |   |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1519

SAUNDRA TAYLOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, LLC; MGM NATIONAL HARBOR 

CASINO; STEVEN MANNING,

Defendants - Appellees, 

and

JOHN DOE, 

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:21-cv-03192-DKC)

Submitted: July 25, 2023 Decided: July 28, 2023

Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1519 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Saundra Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Jeremy Steven Schneider, JACKSON LEWIS PC, 

Reston, Virginia, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1519 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM: 

Saundra Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion to 

reconsider the court’s prior order granting in part and denying in part her motion for leave 

to amend her civil complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 

28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The 

order Taylor seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1519 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/28/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 HERITAGE
        OAKS BANCORP
  Quarterly
        Report on Form 10Q
 for
        the
        Quarter ended March 31, 2006
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 Pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 The
        undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp
        (the
“Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that to my
        knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March
        31,
        2006, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission
        (the
“Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies
        with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange
        Act;
        and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents,
        in
        all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the
        Company.
 
 Dated:
            May 10, 2006
 By:
                  /s/ Lawrence
                    P. WardLawrence
                      P. Ward
                    Chief
                      Executive Officer
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to Heritage Oaks Bancorp, and will be retained
        by Heritage Oaks Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
        or its staff upon request.
#### Thomas McLEAN, Appellant, v. McLANE GROCERY DIST., and Sedgwick CMS, Appellees.

No. 1D09-6191.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 20, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 9, 2010.

Roland P. Tan, Jr, Orlando, for Appellant.

*335Michael S. Waranch of Hurley, Rogner, Miller, Cox, & Waranch & Westcott, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Thomas McLean, Claimant, appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) finding that the parties entered into a valid and binding settlement agreement of Claimant’s January 5, 1996, workers’ compensation case. Because the settlement papers provided that “[t]his agreement shall have no force and effect and shall be fully voidable by either party until such time that the [JCC] enters the aforementioned Order,” and it is undisputed that the “aforementioned Order” (an order approving the attorney’s fee and child support arrearage allocation) had not been entered at the time Claimant rejected the settlement, the JCC erred in finding the parties had reached a settlement. *See Caceres v. Sedano’s Supermarkets,*36 So.3d 919 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); *Jones v. Miami-Dade Cmty. Coll.,*933 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

REVERSED.

BENTON, VAN NORTWICK, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of CV Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |                         
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Dated: August 9, 2006 |  | /s/ DANIEL K. SPIEGELMAN
|                      |  | Daniel K. Spiegelman    
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer