alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 195 (Friday, October 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25529]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[NRC-2010-0002]


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meetings: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATES: Week of October 11, 2010.

Place: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

Status: Public and Closed.

Additional Items To Be Considered

Week of October 11, 2010

Thursday, October 14, 2010
    9:25 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (Tentative).
    a. Final Rule: 10 CFR Part 72 License and Certificate of Compliance 
Terms (RIN 3150-AI09) (Tentative).
    This meeting will be Webcast live at the Web address--http://www.nrc.gov.
* * * * *
    * The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on 
short notice. To verify the status of meetings, call (recording)--(301) 
415-1292. Contact person for more information: Rochelle Bavol, (301) 
415-1651.
* * * * *
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policy-making/schedule.html.
* * * * *
    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation 
to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or 
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another 
format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify Angela Bolduc, Chief, 
Employee/Labor Relations and Work Life Branch, at 301-492-2230, TDD: 
301-415-2100, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f2e21282a232e612d20232b3a2c0f213d2c61282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="33525d54565f521d515c5f574650735d41501d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>. 
mailto:<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b6f67684b657968256c647d25666a62677f64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6d09010e2d031f0e430a021b43000c04011902">[email protected]</span></a>:<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e4858f97a48a9687ca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="02636971426c70612c656d74">[email protected]</span></a> Determinations on requests for 
reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed electronically to subscribers. If you no 
longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
DC 20555 (301-415-1969), or send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5c383d2e30393239722b2e353b34281c322e3f723b332a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b5f5a49575e555e154c49525c534f7b554958155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 5, 2010.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25529 Filed 10-6-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
585 A.2d 374

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL GRAHAM.

September 18, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 775 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 775

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to inflation adjust the 
 $5,000 limitation with respect to dependent care assistance programs 
                  and flexible spending arrangements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2017

Mr. Moolenaar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to inflation adjust the 
 $5,000 limitation with respect to dependent care assistance programs 
                  and flexible spending arrangements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INFLATION ADJUSTMENT FOR DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS 
              AND FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 129(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any 
                taxable year beginning after December 31, 2017, the 
                dollar amounts in subparagraph (A) shall be increased 
                by an amount equal to--
                            ``(i) such amount, multiplied by
                            ``(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment 
                        determined under section 1(f)(3) for the 
                        calendar year in which such taxable year begins 
                        by substituting `calendar year 2014' for 
                        `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph (B) 
                        thereof.
                If any increase determined under this paragraph is not 
                a multiple of $50, such increase shall be rounded to 
                the next lowest multiple of $50.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
The HONORABLE CHARLES R. WOLLE, Chief Judge, United States Distri ct 1 Court for the Southern District of Iowa. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-3017

___________ Robert H. Rounds, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Sandy Baker; Sharon Lamb; Chrys * Southern District of Iowa. Harvey; Nan Horvat; Larry Penland, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: April 6, 1998 Filed: April 15, 1998

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In May 1997, Robert Rounds filed a compla int under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that he suffered an unconstituti onal search and seizure on March 8, 1995. The district court dismissed his claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) because it was barred by the two- 1 year statute of limitations. See Wycoff v. Menke , 773 F.2d 983, 987 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied , 475 U.S. 1028 (1986); Iowa Code Ann. § 614.1(2) (West Supp. 1997).-2-

After careful review of the record, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-20-00305-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

158th District Court of Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-9663-158

Before Gabriel, Bassel, and Wallach, JJ. 

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE REBECCA BILLMEIER, Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion 

for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, 

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief is denied.1

Per Curiam

Delivered: September 30, 2020

1To the extent that relator is attempting to invoke this court’s appellate 

jurisdiction, rather than its writ jurisdiction, relator failed to file a timely notice of 

appeal; therefore, we do not have jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from the 

trial court’s order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b), 26.3; see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. 

Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(4).
EXHIBIT
      32.2




HERITAGE
      OAKS BANCORP




Quarterly
      report on Form 10Q


for
      the
      quarter ended September 30, 2007




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The
      undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the
      “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that, to my
      knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June
      30,
      2007, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      “Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies
      with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange
      Act;
      and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the
      Company.




Dated:November
                7, 2007
            /s/
                Margaret A. TorresMargaret
                A. TorresExecutive
                Vice PresidentChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Heritage Oaks Bancorp, and will be retained
      by Heritage Oaks Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.





-
          1 -
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
CV Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: August 14, 2003 |  | /s/    DANIEL K. SPIEGELMAN                 
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|                       |  | Daniel K. Spiegelman Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MITY Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Paul R. Killpack, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date: January 30, 2007                  /s/ Paul R. Killpack
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Paul R. Killpack
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2014-2 Owner Trust
(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably
relied on information provided to me by the unaffiliated party MUFG Union Bank, N.A.



Date: June 10, 2015



|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|Paul C. Honda                                        | 
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
|of American Honda Finance Corporation                | 
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |
585 A.2d 398

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL MALGIERI.

October 16, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
No. 13,569.

#### Linkenhelt et al. *v.*The Town of Garrett.

Filed March 28, 1889.

From the DeKalb Circuit Court.

*W. L. Penfield,*for appellants.

E. *D. Hartman*and *L. Covell,*for appellee.

Mitchell, J.

The decision of this case is controlled by the judgment given in *Wagner*v. *Town of Garrett, ante,*p. 114.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7616

ALBERNIE STUDWELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, of the St. Brides Correctional Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-687-AM)

Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albernie Studwell, Appellant Pro Se. John Kenneth Byrum, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Studwell v. Warden, No. CA-97-687-AM (E.D. Va. Oct.

22, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1993-D, Ltd's Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations
contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         1,984
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  93,159
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               95,143
<PP&E>                                         3,405,204
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,783,620)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,716,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,757
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,605,970
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,716,727
<SALES>                                        284,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               284,497
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  341,274<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (96,213)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (96,213)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (96,213)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation deple-
tion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and interest
expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7147 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7147

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to treat certain planted soybean 
   crops as harvested commodity crops under the Market Facilitation 
                                Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2018

 Mr. Abraham introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to treat certain planted soybean 
   crops as harvested commodity crops under the Market Facilitation 
                                Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLANTED CROP TREATED AS HARVESTED CROP.

    If the Secretary of Agriculture determines that market conditions 
have discouraged or prevented a producer of a soybean crop from 
harvesting such crop or entering such crop in to the stream of 
commerce, the Secretary shall, for purposes of the Market Facilitation 
Program under part 1409 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations 
(established pursuant to the Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act 
(15 U.S.C. 714 et seq.)) treat such soybean crop as an eligible crop 
for payments under such Market Facilitation Program.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Takeshi Idezawa, Chief Executive Officer of LINE Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2017 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 18, 2018



|    |  |                               
|--- |  | ------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Takeshi Idezawa           
|    |  | Name: Takeshi Idezawa         
|    |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERMAN AMILCAR ALEGRIA

IZQUIERDO, AKA German Amilcar

Alegri, AKA Juian Jose Alegria,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 16

- 73607

Agency No. A205

- 721

- 398

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 15, 2018 **

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

German Amilcar Alegria Izquierdo, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 3 4(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 21 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 73607

withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S .C. § 1252. We review

for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Molina

- Morales v. INS , 237

F.3d 1048, 1050 (9th Cir. 2001), and we deny the petition for review.

Substanti al evidence supports the agency’ s determination that Izquierdo

failed t o establish that any harm he and his family experienced or fear in El

Salvador was or will be on account of a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder

,

622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’ s “desire to be free from

harassment by criminals motiv ated by theft or random violence by gang members

bears no nexus to a protected ground”). Thus, Izquierdo’ s withholding of removal

claim f ails

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
584 A.2d 206

#### LEONARD SERRATORE v. MICHAEL NARDI.

May 1, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 237 *N.J.Super.*566, 568 A.2d 573)