alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              7,346
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     113,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (5,288)
<INVENTORY>                                        30,154
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  149,065
<PP&E>                                            322,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (51,582)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    609,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              87,472
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              157
<OTHER-SE>                                        285,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      609,040
<SALES>                                           298,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  298,715
<CGS>                                             205,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     205,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   51,828
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  5,682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    35,759
<INCOME-TAX>                                       14,303
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                21,456
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       21,456
<EPS-BASIC>                                        1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1.37


</TABLE>
A93A0770.

#### SANDERS v. THE STATE.

(431 SE2d 725)

Johnson, Judge.

David Sanders appeals from his conviction of armed robbery and the denial of his motion for a new trial. Sanders contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the victim’s in-court identification of him as the perpetrator.

The evidence at the suppression hearing showed that the victim was at home on the evening of May 2, 1991, when she heard a knock at her door. She turned on the porch light, looked out the window and recognized the person at the door as a man who had done yard work for her earlier that day. She opened the door, spoke with the man and *726allowed him to come inside her house. Once inside, the man grabbed the victim around her neck, held a knife to her throat, pushed her to the floor, and demanded money. He then grabbed a black bag containing $1,500 which was on the floor and ran. The victim identified her attacker to the police as “David,” but was unable to recall his last name. She described him as a “young black male, short, slim of build, who had done some yard work for her that day.” Based upon this description and other information, David Sanders was arrested for the robbery. On May 11,1991, the police officer who had responded to the robbery call showed the victim a photograph of Sanders and asked her if she recognized the man in the picture. No photographs of any other persons were shown to the victim. The victim identified the subject of the photograph as David, her attacker.

Decided May 25, 1993.

*Albert C. Palmour, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Ralph L. Van Pelt, Jr.,District Attorney, Melodie B. Swartzbaugh, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

Sanders argues that the victim’s in-court identification was tainted by the pretrial photographic showup because the showup was impermissibly suggestive. We need not address the issue of whether the photographic showup was impermissibly suggestive because “(e)ven if the pretrial identification [was] tainted, the in-court identification is not constitutionally inadmissible if it does not depend upon the prior identification but has an independent origin.” (Citations omitted.) *Hamilton v. State,*180 Ga. App. 284, 285 (1) (349 SE2d 230) (1986). We conclude that the in-court identification in this case did not depend on the photographic showup but had an independent origin and was therefore admissible. The victim testified unequivocally that she was familiar with Sanders because he had worked with her in the yard earlier that day, and that she had an opportunity to view him both before and during the robbery. Under these circumstances, we find that the trial court was correct in denying Sanders’ motion to suppress the victim’s in-court identification.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Blackburn and Smith, JJ., concur.*
#### Teddy C. BLEVINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-0597.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 18, 2011.

*1174Salvatore D. Mollica, Assistant Regional Counsel, Tallahassee, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner is hereby granted a belated appeal of the July 27, 2010, judgment and sentence in Bradford County Circuit Court case number 04-2009-CF-407-A. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent petitioner on appeal.

PETITION GRANTED.

BENTON, C.J., CLARK and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Joseph E. Miller, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:


|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(i) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Griffin-Benefit Street Partners BDC Corp. (the “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

|     |                                                                                                                                                     
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:March 31, 2015By:/s/ Joseph E. MillerJoseph E. MillerChief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit
      32.2








HERITAGE
      OAKS BANCORP




Quarterly
      Report on Form 10Q


for
      the
      Quarter ended September 30, 2005











CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






The
      undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the
      “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that, to my
      knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March
      31,
      2005, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      “Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies
      with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange
      Act;
      and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the
      Company.





Dated:
                October 19, 2005****/s/ Margaret
                A. TorresMargaret
                  A. Torres
                Executive
                  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Heritage Oaks Bancorp, and will be retained
      by Heritage Oaks Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
#### Larry James BARBER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondents.

No. 1D10-1251.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 23, 2010.

Larry James Barber, pro se, Petitioner.

Sarah J. Rumph, General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, and Anthony Andrews, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is granted. The Circuit Court for Leon County is directed to enter a final order in *Barber v. Florida Parole Comm’n,*case number 2009-CA-002273, within a reasonable time, not to exceed 30 days from the date of this opinion.

PETITION GRANTED.

WOLF, KAHN, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 23 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk August 23 , 2019

160012 ( 5 7 )

HASSAN M. AHMAD

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

, SC: 1 60012

v COA: 3 41299

Ct of Claims : 17

- 000170

- MZ

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

, Defendant

- Appell ant

.

___________________________________ /

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time for

filing his answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer will be

accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before September 18 , 2019

.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61470-61471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24967]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-2943-000]


Smart One Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

September 29, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Smart One Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 19, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor

[[Page 61471]]

must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8dcbc8dfcec2e3e1e4e3e8def8fdfde2fff9cdebe8ffeea3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3a7c7f687975545653545f694f4a4a55484e7a5c5f4859145d554c">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24967 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,458,613
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               28,750,614
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,521,924)
<INVENTORY>                                  5,369,750
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,301,010
<PP&E>                                      46,157,294
<DEPRECIATION>                             (8,639,021)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             159,379,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       35,436,943
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,651,867
<COMMON>                                    88,888,863
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,742,181)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               159,379,593
<SALES>                                    130,240,331
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           130,240,331
<CGS>                                       87,502,261
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,942,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,178,473
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,269,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,438,184)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,105,179)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,333,005)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,333,005)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)


</TABLE>
#### Joan B. GINNELL, Appellant, v. Brian Robert PACETTI, II, a/k/a Todd Pacetti, Appellee.

No. 4D09-1150.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 14, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 3, 2010.

Lisa Marie Macci of Lisa Marie Macci, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.

Chad R. Laing of Laing Law Group, P.A., and Richard G. Bartmon of Law Offices of Bartmon & Bartmon, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse appellant’s conviction for direct criminal contempt of court only because the trial court’s order does not recite any of the facts constituting contempt. Rule 3.830 states a “judgment of guilt of contempt shall include a recital of those facts on which the adjudication of guilt is based.” The failure to include these facts in the written order is reversible error. *Bouie v. State,*784 So.2d 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); *Schenck v. State,*645 So.2d 71 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); *Woods v. State,*600 So.2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). On remand, the trial court shall issue an order complying in all respects with the requirements of Rule 3.830.

*Reversed and remanded.*

FARMER, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
868 A.2d 321

#### JOHN G. OSTROWSKI AND DOLORES OSTROWSKI, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CAPE TRANSIT CORP. AND TED M. LIVELY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND JOHN DOES 1-5, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS.

Argued February 28, 2005

Decided March 17, 2005.

*F. Herbert Owens, III,*argued the cause for appellants *(Cooper Levenson April Niedelman & Wagenheim*and *Sweeney & Sheehan,*attorneys; *Gerard W. Quinn,*on the briefs).

*Lars S. Hyberg,*argued the cause for respondents (McAllister, *Hyberg, White & Cohen,*attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Skillman’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 371 *N.J.Super.*499, 853 A.2d 985 (2004).

*For affirmance*— Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE and RIVERA-SOTO — 7.

*Opposed*— None.
#### Marie SAUNDERS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-3215.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 12, 2010.

Marie Saunders, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. *See Lambrix v. State,*698 So.2d 247 (Fla.1996).

WOLF, KAHN, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 15

                        ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT
                         CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                REGARDING INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REVIEW REPORT


The Board of Directors
Northfield Laboratories Inc.:

With respect to the registration statement on Form S-8 of Northfield
Laboratories Inc., we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our
report dated December 20, 1996 related to our review of interim financial
information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

                                        /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

                                            KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Chicago, Illinois
January 7, 1997
Exhibit 15.2

Zurich, 13 March 2015

Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in each of the following registration statements:



| | (1) | on Form F-3 (Registration Number 333-200212) of UBS AG, and each related prospectus currently outstanding under such registration statement,
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | on Form S-8 (Registration Numbers 333-200634; 333-200635; 333-200641; and 333-200665) of UBS Group AG, and each related prospectus currently outstanding under any of the aforementioned registration statements,
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | the base prospectus of Corporate Asset Backed Corporation (CABCO) dated 23 June 2004 (Registration Number 333-111572),
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | the Form 8-K of CABCO dated 23 June 2004 (SEC File Number 001-13444), and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (5) | the Prospectus Supplements relating to the CABCO Series 2004-101 Trust dated 10 May 2004 (Registration Number 033-91744) and 13 May 2004 (Registration Number 033-91744-05),
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated 5 March 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of UBS AG and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of UBS AG, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended 31 December 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                      |  |                                   
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|Ernst & Young Ltd     |  |                                   
|                      | 
|/s/ Jonathan Bourne   |  | /s/ Troy J. Butner                
|                      | 
|Jonathan Bourne       |  | Troy J. Butner                    
|Licensed Audit Expert |  | Certified Public Accountant (U.S.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,229
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,352
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,664)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,937
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,105
<PP&E>                                          38,464
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,297)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,028
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,588
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,188
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,028
<SALES>                                        444,695
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               444,695
<CGS>                                          396,965
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  396,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,085
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,624)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       947
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,571)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,905)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,666)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)


</TABLE>