alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 2.2(a)
 PROMISSORY NOTE
 
 $11,856,720
Atlanta, GeorgiaMay 27, 2011
 
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, GP GLOBAL USA, LLC, 430 GENTRY ROAD, LLC, 32007 64TH STREET, LLC AND 600 EAST SHERWOOD, LLC hereby unconditionally jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of MIDWEST-CBK, INC. (the “Lender”) at the offices of the Lender located at 1031 One East Weaver Street, Greenwich, CT 06831, ELEVEN MILLION EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY SIX THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED TWENTY DOLLARS ($11,856,720), or such lesser amount as may be the then outstanding and unpaid balance of the Loan made by the Lender to the Borrowers pursuant to, and in accordance with the terms of, the Loan and Security Agreement dated May 27, 2011, by and between the Borrowers and the Lender as amended, restated, supplemented, replaced or otherwise modified from time to time (the “Loan Agreement”), the provisions of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference, in lawful money of the United States of America in federal or other immediately available funds.  Terms used herein and not defined herein have their respective defined meanings as set forth in the Loan Agreement.
 
 The Borrowers also unconditionally promise to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of this Promissory Note at the rates and at the times specified for the Loan as set forth in the Loan Agreement.
 
 The Borrowers may prepay the Loan evidenced hereby in accordance with the provisions of the Loan Agreement.
 
 Presentment for payment, demand, protest and notice of demand, notice of dishonor and notice of non-payment and all other notices are hereby waived by the Borrowers.
 
 This Promissory Note is the Note under, is secured in accordance with the terms of, and is entitled to the benefits of, the Loan Agreement and the other Loan Documents which, among other things, contain provisions with respect to security for the indebtedness evidenced hereby and provisions with respect to the remedies available to the Lender upon an Event of Default, all upon the terms and conditions specified therein.
 
 This Promissory Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York and has been executed under seal.
 
 [Signatures on Following Page]
 
  
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrowers have executed this Promissory Note under seal, as of the date first above written.
 
 GP GLOBAL USA, LLC
 
 By: _____________________________________
 Name:     Jud Wooddy
 Title:
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
 
 
 430 GENTRY ROAD, LLC
 
 By:  _____________________________________
 Name:      Jud Wooddy
 Title:        Vice President
 
 
 32007 64TH STREET, LLC
 
 By: _____________________________________
 Name:      Jud Wooddy
 Title:        Vice President
 
 
 600 EAST SHERWOOD, LLC
 
 By:  _____________________________________
 Name:      Jud Wooddy
 Title:        Vice President
 
  Signature Page to Promissory Note
#### STATE ex rel. John SANDELL v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0729.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 1, 2011.

In re Sandell, John; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 120.935; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45442-KH.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), *1245660 So.2d 1189; *State v. Parker,*98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6466

ALECK J. CARPITCHER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

TRACY RAY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (CA-04-313-7)

Submitted: January 13, 2006 Decided: February 13, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Bryan Amolsch, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant.

Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Aleck J. Carpitcher seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254

proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district

court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find both that the district court’s assessment of his

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Carpitcher has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Tony McGEEHEE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-0621.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 4, 2011.

Tony McGeehee, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. *See*Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(c)(4)(B).

BENTON, C.J., PADOVANO and "WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         211,478
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,154,611
<ALLOWANCES>                                   708,734 
<INVENTORY>                                    272,764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,458,885
<PP&E>                                       9,139,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                 840,109
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,877,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,435,237
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,897
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,186,269
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,877,988
<SALES>                                     16,671,256
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,671,256
<CGS>                                       10,413,588
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,832,430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               436,673
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             574,045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (597,847)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (239,139)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (358,708)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (358,708)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
#### In re John D. CONRY.

No. 2010-B-1929.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 25, 2010.

ORDER

Considering the Petition for Interim Suspension for Threat of Harm filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and the response thereto filed by respondent,

IT IS ORDERED that respondent, John Conry, Louisiana Bar Roll number 29807, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.2, pending further orders of this court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Office of Disciplinary Counsel may seek the appointment of a trustee(s) to protect the interests of respondent’s clients pursuant to the provisions of Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 27, if appropriate.

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately-

FOR THE COURT:

*/a/*Bernette J. Johnson

Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Ascendis Pharma A/S (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2014,
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Jan Møller Mikkelsen, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas P. Soloway, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|       |  |                         
|------ |  | ------------------------
|Date:  |  | March 26, 2015          
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Jan Møller Mikkelsen
|Name:  |  | Jan Møller Mikkelsen    
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer 
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Thomas P. Soloway   
|Name:  |  | Thomas P. Soloway       
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
 ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Medley Management Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brook Taube, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 
 
 By:/s/ Brook TaubeBrook TaubeCo-Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chairman(Co-Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 April 29, 2020
 
 A signed original of this certification required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Zenovia TURNER v. STATE of Louisiana, City of Monroe.

No. 2010-KD-1739.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 16, 2010.

In re Turner, Zenovia; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, Monroe City Court, No. 2009-16616.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the application to the Monroe City Court, Docket Number 200916616, for its consideration as a notice of and/or application for writ of review or motion for appeal.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

NICHOLAS AND TERESA BENTIVEGNA,

Petitioners

v.

HAMPTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL

DISTRICT, HAMPTON TOWNSHIP,

ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ALLEGHENY

COUNTY BOARD OF ASSESSMENT

APPEALS AND REVIEW,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 82 WM 2023

NICHOLAS AND TERESA BENTIVEGNA,

Petitioners

v.

HAMPTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL

DISTRICT, HAMPTON TOWNSHIP,

ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ALLEGHENY

COUNTY BOARD OF ASSESSMENT

APPEALS AND REVIEW,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 83 WM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2 nd day of May , 2024, the Application for Extraordinary Relief is

DENIED.
861 A.2d 131

#### A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Argued November 8, 2004

Decided December 7, 2004.

*Michael A. Guariglia*argued the cause for appellant *(McCarter & English,*attorneys; *Mr. Guariglia and Charles M. Costenbader,*of counsel; *Mr. Guariglia, Mr. Costenbader and Open Weaver Banks,*on the briefs).

*Mala S. Narayanan,*Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent *(Peter C. Harvey,*Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; *Patrick DeAlmeida,*Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; *Ms. Narayanan*and *Margaret A. Holland,*Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Stem’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 365 *N.J.Super.*472, 839 A.2d 914 (2004).

*78
      *For reversal and, remandment*— Chief Justice PORITZ, Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE and RIVERA-SOTO — 7.

*Opposed*— None.
(logo)  Rialto

CAPITAL 

 

 

2015 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of March 1, 2014 by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and Situs Holdings, LLC as Operating Advisor relating to the Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, COMM 2014-LC15 Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates **(COMM 2014-LC15)**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.  All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.  A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, Managing Director

 

Date: March 1, 2016
### **EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

 

## PDS GAMING CORPORATIONCONTINUESMANAGEMENT BUYOUT NEGOTIATIONS

 

 

 

LASVEGAS, NV – July 8, 2003 – PDS Gaming Corporation (NasdaqSC: PDSG) todayannounced that it has extended, until August 10, 2003, its letter of intentrelating to the proposed management group acquisition of shares of common stockof the Company, which was announced in the Company’s press releases datedFebruary 24, 2003 and February 26, 2003.

 

Aspecial committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, consisting of itsindependent directors, and the management group continue to negotiate toward adefinitive agreement.  The proposal issubject to, among other things, the execution of a definitive agreement, approvalby a committee of the Company’s independent directors and by a majority of theCompany’s shares not owned by the management group, the procuring of allnecessary consents of the Company’s commercial lenders and the trustees underthe indentures covering the Company’s outstanding debt securities, the securingof required approvals from all gaming regulatory agencies, the obtaining of thenecessary financing, and the receipt by the Company of a favorable fairnessopinion from an investment bank.

 

 

Foradditional information, please contact:

 

PeterCleary

InterimChief Financial Officer

PDSGaming Corporation

6171McLeod Drive

LasVegas, NV  89120

(702)736-0700

 

 

APROXY SOLICITATION WITH RESPECT TO, OR TENDER OFFER FOR, THE OUTSTANDING SHARESOF PDS GAMING CORPORATION COMMON STOCK HAS NOT YET COMMENCED.  IF A PROXY SOLICITATION OR TENDER OFFERCOMMENCES, EACH HOLDER OF COMMON STOCK OF PDS GAMING CORPORATION SHOULD READTHE PROXY STATEMENT OR TENDER OFFER STATEMENT WHEN IT BECOMES AVAILABLE BECAUSEIT WILL CONTAIN

 

----

 

IMPORTANTINFORMATION ABOUT THE MERGER OR TENDER OFFER. ONCE A FILING IS MADE, HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK OF PDS GAMING CORPORATIONCAN OBTAIN THE PROXY STATEMENT OR TENDER OFFER STATEMENT AND OTHER DOCUMENTSTHAT ARE FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AT ITS WEB SITE ATHTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV.  HOLDERS OF COMMONSTOCK OF PDS GAMING CORPORATION MAY ALSO OBTAIN COPIES OF THE PROXY STATEMENTOR TENDER OFFER STATEMENT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES ANDEXCHANGE COMMISSION FOR FREE BY CONTACTING JOHAN P. FINLEY AT THE COMPANY WHENTHE DOCUMENTS BECOME AVAILABLE.

 

###

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          13,596
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         399,868
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           375,846
<LOANS>                                      1,197,135
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,777
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,671,508
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,065,915
<SHORT-TERM>                                   102,700
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             24,387
<LONG-TERM>                                    366,530
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                     111,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,671,508
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 20,862
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,341
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     2
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                28,205
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,684
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,749
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,456
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      210
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,926
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,001
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,224
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,224
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.07
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,354
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,031
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,604
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       37
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,777
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,777
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
No. 87-1268.

#### Worth *v.*Selchow & Righter Co. et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 849 

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. ROE of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. RUIZ, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. 

HURD, Mr. BOST, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mrs. BROOKS of 

Indiana, Mr. HENSARLING, Mrs. WAGNER, Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. MARSHALL, and Mr. ALLEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees 

on Energy and Commerce, and Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Seniors’ 

5 Access to Medicare Act of 2017’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 849 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE INDEPENDENT PAYMENT ADVI2 SORY BOARD. 

3 Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protec4 tion and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148), sec5 tions 3403 and 10320 of such Act (including the amend6 ments made by such sections) are repealed, and any provi7 sion of law amended by such sections is hereby restored 

8 as if such sections had not been enacted into law. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS