alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.13












Exhibit 4.13



The following is a summary of amendments to the Ford Motor Company Savings and Stock Investment
Plan for Salaried Employees, effective January 23, 2009:





	 	•	 	Oakmark Select Fund-Class I and Templeton Foreign Fund–Advisor Class will be closed to
new monies effective January 23, 2009 and will be removed from the lineup effective July
30, 2009. Any contributions and loan repayments allocated to or assets remaining in these
funds as of 4:00 p.m., ET, on these dates will be reallocated as follows:






-Oakmark Select Fund–Class I Þ Vanguard Institutional Index Fund–Institutional
Plus Shares;




-Templeton Foreign Fund–Advisor Class Þ BGI EAFE Equity Index Fund.
A93A0479.

#### BROWN v. WATERS.

(432 SE2d 817)

Blackburn, Judge.

On July 2, 1991, Shari Waters gave birth to a boy. The appellant, Aubrey Brown, signed the birth certificate as the child’s father, and the child was given his last name. On August 25, 1991, Brown was arrested for a felony offense, and he was eventually convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment.

On August 12, 1992, Waters filed a petition to change the child’s last name from Brown to Waters, alleging that Brown’s consent to the petition was not required because he had abandoned the child. Brown was never served personally in the state correctional facility, but he happened to see the notice by publication that appeared in a newspaper. Brown immediately wrote a letter that was filed with the Clerk of Court on August 31, 1992, disputing the allegation that he had abandoned the child and objecting to the petition for several reasons. He subsequently mailed a formal objection to the petition, which was not received and filed until after the trial court granted Waters’ petition on October 6, 1992. This discretionary appeal followed.

“Georgia law provides that a minor child’s name may be changed by presenting a petition to the superior court of the county of the child’s residence. Written consent of the parent or parents if they are living and have not abandoned the child must be filed with the petition, and before the child’s name can be changed ‘the parent or parents of such child shall be served with a copy of the petition.’ [OCGA § 19-12-1 (d)]. If written objections are filed, objecting to the change of the name of the minor child, by any interested or affected party within the time specified, the court shall thereupon proceed to hear and determine the matter. [OCGA § 19-12-2].” *Doe v. Roe,*235 Ga. 318, 319 (219 SE2d 700) (1975).

In the instant case, it is uncontroverted that there was no attempt to serve Brown personally with the petition or to obtain his written consent to the name change. Waters did publish a notice of the petition in the legal organ of the county, which would have sufficed as notice to Brown if his location or address had been unknown. See OCGA § 19-12-1 (d). However, in Brown’s letter objecting to the petition, he stated some basis for finding that Waters was aware of his incarceration and could have served him personally. In addition to that lack of personal service, the judgment in this case is infirm because of the trial court’s failure to consider Brown’s written objections to the petition, contrary to the requirement of OCGA § 19-12-2. Accordingly, it appearing that issues of fact existed over whether Brown was properly served with the petition and whether Brown had abandoned the child, the trial court erred in granting the petition to change the child’s name without holding a hearing to consider *867Brown’s stated objections.

Decided June 8, 1993.

Aubrey A. Brown, *pro se.*

*Jon G. Branan,*for appellee.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Johnson and Smith, JJ., concur.*
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 15


                         ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                 REGARDING INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REVIEW REPORT



The Board of Directors
Northfield Laboratories Inc.:

With respect to the registration statement on Form S-8 of Northfield
Laboratories Inc., we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our
report dated September 26, 1997 related to our review of interim financial
information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



                                             KPMG Peat Marwick LLP





Chicago, Illinois
October 10, 1997
#### STATE ex rel. Fred Christopher BEVERLY v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2009-KH-2729.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Beverly, Fred Christopher; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rapides, 9th .Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 266815; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 09-00675.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; *State v. Parker,*98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel Melinie v. State;*cf. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D).
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Ronald THOMPSON, Appellee.

No. 1D10-1841.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 12, 2011.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Steven Brian Whittington of Whitting-ton & Culbert, P.A., Green Cove Springs, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing. *See State v. Thompson,*4 So.3d 689, 690 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (“We agree with the State’s argument that imposition of the 20-year minimum mandatory sentence is required by law. Whether imposition of the 20-year mandatory term would be a ‘crime in itself,’ as stated by the trial court, is a matter directed to the legislature.” (footnote omitted)).

BENTON, C.J., DAVIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25604]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders, Special Emphasis Panel, CDRC Conflicts.
    Date: October 26, 2010.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Christine A. Livingston, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of 
Health/NIDCD, 6120 Executive Blvd.--MSC 7180, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 496-8683, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4e2227382720293d2d0e232f27226020272660292138"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2a46435c43444d59496a474b434604444342044d455c">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 5, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-25604 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARY CATHERINE KRENEK

,

Appellant,

v.

SWINERTON BUILDERS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 2 2

- 00 143

- CV

Appeal from the

53 rd District Court

o f Travis County, Texas

(TC# D

- 1

- GN

- 22

- 001351 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be

dismissed for want of prosecution. 1

Finding that the clerk’s record has not been filed due to the fault of the Appellant, Mar y

C atherine Krenek , we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Unless otherwise excused, a non

- indigent appellant must either pay for or make

arrangements for the payment of the fees related to preparation of the appellate record to ensure

that the record is timely filed. T EX .R.A PP .P. 35.3(a)(2), (b)(3) ; see T EX .R.A PP .P. 37.3(b), (c) . The

clerk’s record was due to be filed on August 12, 2022.

1 We hear this case on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 41.3.2 The Travis County District Clerk notified the Court that the clerk’s record would not be

filed because Appellant had not made financial arrangements to pay for the record. In accordance

with Rule 37.3(b)

, on August 16, 2022, the Clerk of the Court notified Appellant by letter regarding

the failure to make financial arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and advised Appellant that

the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless a respon se was received within ten

days and showed grounds for continuing the appeal. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 37.3(b) . Appellant has not

filed any written response or otherwise showed that grounds exist for the appeal to be continued.

Pursuant to Rules 37.3(b) and 42.3(b) and (c) , we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See

T EX .R.A PP .P. 37.3(b)

, 42.3(b), (c)

.

August 30, 2022

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
#### Scott Jay FEDER, Appellant, v. Jamie Richman FEDER, Appellee.

No. 3D08-402.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 25, 2009.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Sept. 2, 2010.

Scott Jay Feder, Miami, for appellant.

Hersch & Talisman and Patrice A. Talisman, Coconut Grove; Richard J. Preira, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before COPE and SUAREZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

COPE, J.

This is an appeal of a final judgment awarding appellate attorney’s fees. We affirm.

The underlying proceeding was for dissolution of marriage. The trial court entered judgment and the appellant former husband appealed. This court affirmed without opinion. *Feder v. Feder,*922 So.2d 213 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). By unpublished order, this court granted the appellee former wife’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees, and remanded to the trial court to fix the amount. This court denied the former husband’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees.

On remand, the former husband conducted discovery regarding the attorney’s fee request. At the attorney’s fee hearing, the former husband argued that he should not have to pay much, if any, of the former wife’s attorney’s fees. The trial court correctly ruled that the issue of entitlement had already been decided by this court. *See Randall v. Randall,*930 So.2d 840, 841 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). The trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing and entered an attorney’s fee judgment. The former husband has appealed.

The former husband asks this court to revisit its earlier order granting appellate attorney’s fees to the former wife. This court’s ruling in the prior appeal established the law of the case. *Barrero v.*
      *235
      *Ocean Bank,*729 So.2d 412, 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

However, Florida recognizes a manifest injustice exception to the law of the case doctrine. *Florida Dept. of Transp. v. Juliano,*801 So.2d 101, 106 (Fla.2001); *Strazzulla v. Hendrick,*177 So.2d 1, 3 (Fla.1965). The former husband contends that a manifest injustice has been occasioned with respect to this attorney’s fee award.

After review of the parties’ respective motions for appellate attorney’s fees and response filed in the prior appeal, it is clear that the former husband’s arguments advanced in this appeal simply reiterate matters raised by the parties in the last appeal. We are not convinced that any manifest injustice has been shown, and adhere to the law of the case established on the last appeal. We affirm on the remaining issues without discussion.

Affirmed.
(logo) CWCapital

ASSET MANAGEMENT

 

 

**Annual Statement as toCompliance**

**For the Period of January1, 2016 to December 31, 2016**

 

GSMS 2014-GC22

 

 

In accordance with Item 1123 ofRegulation AB and with the requirements detailed in §10.7 of the Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for the above-mentionedCMBS pool, (the “CMBS Pool”), CWCapital Asset Management LLC(“CWCAM”), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing thisOfficer’s Certificate with respect to the following:

 

(A) a review of CWCAM’sactivities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the“Reporting Period”) and of CWCAM’s performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and;

 

(B) to the best of suchofficer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

Should you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact us.

 

Sincerely,

CWCapital Asset Management LLC

 

/s David B. Iannarone

David B. Iannarone

President

 

 

7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite500 West, Bethesda, MD 20814

www.cwcapital.com
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 8, 2020

izm

Order 

Clerk

June 8, 2020

161250 (36)

In re BYRD

____________________________________ SC: 161250

COA: 351102

GERALD ANTHONY-DECELL BYRD

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

WAYNE CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE, and

WAYNE COUNTY CLERK,

Defendants-Appellees.

___________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, Appellant’s motion for reconsideration of the May 

11, 2020 order is denied because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously. 

Within 21 days of the date of this order, Appellant shall pay the initial partial filing fee of 

$43.00, submit a copy of the May 11, 2020 order, and refile a copy of the pleadings as 

ordered. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this application.
EXHIBIT 12.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Larry Jasinski, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of ReWalk Robotics Ltd.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





/s/ Larry JasinskiLarry JasinskiChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)





Date: February 27, 2015
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Corporate Trust ServicesMAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RBS Commercial Funding Inc. 

600 Washington Boulevard

Stamford, Connecticut 06901

 

 

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2014-C21 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C21

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

March 3, 2015

 

/s/ Brian Smith 

BRIAN SMITH 

Vice President

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
|------------------------|
#### STATE ex rel. Susan DELAUGHTER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1226.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re Delaughter, Susan; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Franklin, 5th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 2008-729F; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,598-KH.

Denied.
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1512 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

for compensation to States incarcerating undocumented 

aliens charged with a felony or two or more misdemeanors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HR 1512 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. ASSISTANCE FOR STATES INCARCERATING UN2 DOCUMENTED ALIENS CHARGED WITH CER3 TAIN CRIMES. 

4 Section 241(i)(3)(A) of the Immigration and Nation5 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1231(i)(3)(A)) is amended by inserting 

6 ‘‘charged with or’’ before ‘‘convicted’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 8, 2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 194 (Thursday, October 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency


Notice of Adjustment of Statewide Per Capita Impact Indicator

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice that the statewide per capita impact 
indicator under the Public Assistance program for disasters declared on 
or after October 1, 2010, will be increased.

DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 2010, and applies to major disasters 
declared on or after October 1, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tod Wells, Recovery Directorate, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20472, (202) 646-3834.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 44 CFR 206.48 provides that FEMA will adjust 
the statewide per capita impact indicator under the Public Assistance 
program to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban 
Consumers published by the Department of Labor.
    FEMA gives notice that the statewide per capita impact indicator 
will be increased to $1.30 for all disasters declared on or after 
October 1, 2010.
    FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price 
Index for All Urban Consumers of 1.1 percent for the 12-month period 
ended in August 2010. The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. 
Department of Labor released the information on September 17, 2010.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants.)

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-25334 Filed 10-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
EXHIBIT No. 15

                               [KPMG LETTERHEAD]


The Board of Directors
PSS World Medical, Inc.



Re:  Registration Statement File Nos. 33-80657, 33-90464, 333-15043,  333-64185,
     33-85004, 33-97756, 33-99046, 33-97754,  333-30427,  333-64187,  333-50526,
     and 333-58272 on Form S-8


With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated February 6, 2003 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is
not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.




/s/  KPMG LLP

Jacksonville, Florida
February 7, 2003