alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1425 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1425

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 4551 East 52nd Street in Odessa, Texas, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
               Marvin `Rex' Young Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT MARVIN ``REX'' YOUNG POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4551 East 52nd Street in Odessa, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Marvin `Rex' Young Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Marvin `Rex' Young Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1425

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 4551 East 52nd Street in Odessa, Texas, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
               Marvin `Rex' Young Post Office Building''.
```
EXHIBIT 14

                             A.B. WATLEY GROUP INC.

                                 CODE OF ETHICS

                                       FOR

       CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, CHIEF ACCOUNTING
         OFFICER OR CONTROLLER AND PERSONS PERFORMING SIMILAR FUNCTIONS

GENERAL PHILOSOPHY

The honesty, integrity and sound judgment of A.B. Watley Group Inc.'s ("ABWG" or
the "Company") Chief Financial  Officer,  Chief Accounting Officer or Controller
and persons performing similar functions (collectively the "Principal Officers")
is  fundamental  to our reputation  and success.  The  professional  and ethical
conduct of the  Principal  Officers is essential to the proper  functioning  and
success of ABWG.

APPLICABILITY

This Code of Ethics shall apply to ABWG's Principal Officers.

STANDARDS OF CONDUCT

To the best of their knowledge and ability, the Principal Officers shall:

      o     act with honesty and  integrity,  including the ethical  handling of
            actual or  apparent  conflicts  of  interest  between  personal  and
            professional relationships;

      o     provide full, fair, accurate,  timely, and understandable disclosure
            in reports and  documents  that ABWG files with,  or submits to, the
            Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  ("Commission")  and in  other
            public communications made by ABWG;

      o     comply with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

      o     promote the prompt internal  reporting of violations of this Code of
            Ethics to ABWG's board of directors and outside legal counsel;

      o     respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of
            employment;

      o     maintain the skills necessary and relevant to ABWG's needs; and

      o     proactively  promote  ethical and honest behavior among employees of
            ABWG and its subsidiaries.

All  Principal  Officers are expected to adhere to the ABWG Code of Ethics.  Any
violation of this Code of Ethics will be subject to appropriate  discipline,  up
to and including  dismissal from the Company and prosecution  under the law. The
board of directors shall have  responsibility for administration of this Code of
Ethics and shall have the sole and absolute  discretionary  authority to approve
any deviation or waiver from this Code of Ethics for Principal Officers.  In the
event that a waiver of,  modification of and/or change to this Code of Ethics is
approved and granted, then the notice of the waiver, modification, and/or change
shall be  disclosed as may be required by SEC rules or the rules of any exchange
on which the securities of the Company are then trading.


                                       1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-02990-WYD-MEH WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, Plaintiff,
v. KEN SALAZAR, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior, Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 14, 2010. The Federal Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Temporarily Stay All Proceedings [filed April 12, 2010; docket #38 ] is granted . All proceedings in this matter are hereby stayed , pending a decision on the Federal Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Actions by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. The partie s shall file a status report within five business days upon receipt of the Judicial Panel’s decision. The Status Conference scheduled for May 5, 2010, is hereby vacated
.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the Consolidated
Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1998 and the Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the nine month period ended September 30, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,910
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,226
<PP&E>                                           7,017
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,437)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,912
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       104,128
<OTHER-SE>                                    (64,789)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,079
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,519
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 606
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,776)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,776)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,776)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.72)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, November 3, 2010, 2 p.m. to November 3, 2010, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 30, 2010, 75 FR DOC. 2010-21663.                

Date and time was changed from 11/3/2010; 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. to reflect 11/10/2010; 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: October 5, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-25639 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### RATHBORNE PROPERTIES, L.L.C., et al. v. EXXON MOBIL CORP., et al.

No. 2010-CC-2822.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 23, 2010.

In re Kenneth R. Wynne d/b/a The Wynne Law Firm; The Wynne Law Firm; Wynne, Kenneth R.; —Third Party(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. N, No. 2001-12081; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-C-1625.

Stay Denied; Writ Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25062]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Genomic Medicine Program Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Genomic Medicine 
Program Advisory Committee will meet on October 22, 2010, at the 
Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., 
Washington, DC. The meeting will convene at 9 a.m. and adjourn at 5 
p.m. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice and make 
recommendations to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on using genetic 
information to optimize medical care of Veterans and to enhance 
development of tests and treatments for diseases particularly relevant 
to Veterans.
    The Committee will receive program updates from the VA program 
staff; continue to discuss optimal ways for VA to incorporate genomic 
information into its health care program while applying appropriate 
ethical oversight and protecting the privacy of Veterans; and receive 
updates on genomics initiatives within Patient Care Services; efforts 
to increase genetics education among VA Nursing Staff; and VA's latest 
efforts to improve its electronic medical records system.
    Public comments will be received at 3 p.m. Public comments will be 
limited to five minutes each. Individuals who speak are invited to 
submit 1-2 page summaries of their comments at the time of the meeting 
for inclusion in the official meeting record. Any member of the public 
seeking additional information should contact Dr. Sumitra Muralidhar, 
Designated Federal Officer, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c1b2b4aca8b5b3a0efacb4b3a0ada8a5a9a0b381b7a0efa6aeb7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fd8e889094898f9cd390888f9c919499959c8fbd8b9cd39a928b">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 461-
1669.

    Dated: September 30, 2010.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Vivian Drake,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-25062 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
861 A.2d 843

#### KAREN SMITH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR BRENDEN WASIEWSKI, A MINOR, PLAINTIFFS-MOVANTS, v. FIREWORKS BY GIRONE, INC., AND LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND TOWNSHIP OF DEPTFORD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

October 6, 2004.

It is ORDERED that the motion for clarification is granted, in part. The judgment of the Court is modified to provide that the matter is reversed and remanded to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, to consider the issues raised by defendant Lexington Insurance Company but not reached by that court in respect of its disposition of A-3312-01.
#### NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Von PATRICK; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents.

No. 00-1735.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 29, 2000.

Decided Jan. 18, 2001.

*257Jonathan H. Walker, Mason, Cowardin *&*Mason, Newport News, VA, for petitioner. Gregory Edward Camden, Montagna, Klein & Camden, L.L.P., Norfolk, VA, for respondents.

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s and District Director’s orders awarding attorney’s fees to claimant’s counsel pursuant to the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-950 (West 1986 & Supp.2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. *Newport News Shipbuilding and, Dry Dock Co. v. Von Patrick,*Nos. 99-789, 00-291 (BRB Apr. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
* Pursuantto 5TH CIR.R.47.5,the court has determined thatthis opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances setforth

in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 6, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50397

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MICHAEL VICTOR NEWSOM

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:04-CR-121-ALL

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Michael Victor Newsom has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Newsom has filed a response. Our

independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Newsom’s response

discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
No. 05-50397

2

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Newsom’s

motion for the appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


RULE
13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)


OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





I, Kelly
E. Lang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of
Merix Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Merix Corporation.








By:
                /s/ KELLY E. LANG


Kelly E.
Lang


Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer)







April 8,
2009
585 A.2d 377

#### JOHN MAGUIRE v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD.

September 18, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.4

LIBERTY PROPERTY LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP

CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liberty Property Limited
Partnership (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR., Chief Financial Officer of
Liberty Property Trust (the sole general partner of the Company), certify, in
connection with Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, that based on my knowledge:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR.
|George J. Alburger, Jr.    
|Chief Financial Officer    

Date: August 11, 2003
Exhibit
      32.1





HERITAGE
      OAKS BANCORP




Quarterly
      Report on Form 10Q


for
      the
      Quarter ended June 30, 2006





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The
      undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the
      “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that to my
      knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June
      30,
      2006, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      “Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies
      with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange
      Act;
      and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the
      Company.






Dated:
              August 3, 2006
            
            /s/
              Lawrence P. WardLawrence P. Ward,
              President and Chief Executive
                Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Heritage Oaks Bancorp, and will be retained
      by Heritage Oaks Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,400,000
<SECURITIES>                                 7,300,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              167,700,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           311,400,000
<PP&E>                                       5,100,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 396,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             325,900,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      276,800,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,120,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   276,800
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            50,400,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               36,200,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,000,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              93,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,200,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,700,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,500,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,400,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1 15-4150-cv Riley v. Brook

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT


## SUMMARY ORDER

Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted a nd is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party mu st cite either the Federal Appendix or an electronic database (with the notation “sum mary order”). A party citing a summary order must serve a copy of it on any party not represented by counsel.

At a stated term of the United States Cour t of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse , 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 23 rd day of June, two thousand sixteen.
PRESENT: J OSÉ A. C ABRANES , S USAN L. C ARNEY , C HRISTOPHER F. D RONEY , Circuit Judges

.

K

ATHLEEN R ILEY , Plaintiff-Appellant
,
v. No. 15-4150-cv
J ONATHAN B ROOK , Defendant-Appellee

.

FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT: Sharon L. Annis, Buehler & Annis, P.L.C., Brattleboro, VT.

FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE: Allan R. Keyes & Eric J. Morgan, Ryan Smith & Carbine, Ltd., Rutland, VT.
Appeal from the November 24, 2015 judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont (Christina C. Reiss, Chief Judge ).

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION WHEREO F, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED

.2 Plaintiff-appellant Kathleen Riley appeals from the District Court’s November 24, 2015 judgment dismissing her complaint as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. “We review de

novo a district court’s grant of a motion to dismiss, including its legal interpretation and application of a statute of limitations . . . .” Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co. v. Quicken Loans Inc. , 810 F.3d 861, 865 (2d Cir. 2015). Applying this standard, we affirm, su bstantially for the reasons stated by the District Court in its thorough and well-reasoned November 24, 2015 opinion and order. See Riley v. Brook
, No. 2:15-CV-150, 2015 WL 7572308 (D. Vt. Nov. 24, 2015) (citing Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 513 (2016)).

CONCLUSION
We have considered all of Riley’s arguments on appeal and found them to be without merit. Accordingly, the November 24, 2015 judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT: Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
#### Bill SMITH and Mary Smith v. OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION d/b/a Ochsner Fertility Clinic.

No. 2011-CC-0427.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 1, 2011.

In re Ochsner Clinic Foundation; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 691-452; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. ll-C-33.

Not considered. Not timely filed. See Supreme Court Rule X Section 5.