```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1495 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1495

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 2007''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--This table of contents for this Act is as 
follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.
                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 1001. Project authorizations.
Sec. 1002. Small projects for flood damage reduction.
Sec. 1003. Small projects for emergency streambank protection.
Sec. 1004. Small projects for navigation.
Sec. 1005. Small projects for improvement of the quality of the 
                            environment.
Sec. 1006. Small projects for aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 1007. Small projects for shoreline protection.
Sec. 1008. Small projects for snagging and sediment removal.
                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 2001. Non-Federal contributions.
Sec. 2002. Harbor cost sharing.
Sec. 2003. Funding to process permits.
Sec. 2004. National shoreline erosion control development and 
                            demonstration program.
Sec. 2005. Small shore and beach restoration and protection projects.
Sec. 2006. Aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 2007. Small flood damage reduction projects.
Sec. 2008. Modification of projects for improvement of the quality of 
                            the environment.
Sec. 2009. Written agreement for water resources projects.
Sec. 2010. Assistance for remediation, restoration, and reuse.
Sec. 2011. Compilation of laws.
Sec. 2012. Dredged material disposal.
Sec. 2013. Wetlands mitigation.
Sec. 2014. Mitigation for fish and wildlife losses.
Sec. 2015. Remote and subsistence harbors.
Sec. 2016. Beneficial uses of dredged material.
Sec. 2017. Cost-sharing provisions for certain areas.
Sec. 2018. Use of other Federal funds.
Sec. 2019. Revision of project partnership agreement.
Sec. 2020. Cost sharing.
Sec. 2021. Expedited actions for emergency flood damage reduction.
Sec. 2022. Watershed and river basin assessments.
Sec. 2023. Tribal partnership program.
Sec. 2024. Wildfire firefighting.
Sec. 2025. Technical assistance.
Sec. 2026. Lakes program.
Sec. 2027. Coordination and scheduling of Federal, State, and local 
                            actions.
Sec. 2028. Project streamlining.
Sec. 2029. Cooperative agreements.
Sec. 2030. Training funds.
Sec. 2031. Access to water resource data.
Sec. 2032. Shore protection projects.
Sec. 2033. Ability to pay.
Sec. 2034. Leasing authority.
Sec. 2035. Cost estimates.
Sec. 2036. Principles and guidelines.
Sec. 2037. Independent peer review.
Sec. 2038. Studies and reports for water resources projects.
Sec. 2039. Offshore oil and gas fabrication port.
Sec. 2040. Use of firms employing local residents.
Sec. 2041. Support of Army Civil Works Program.
Sec. 2042. Federal hopper dredges.
Sec. 2043. Criteria for operation and maintenance of harbor dredging 
                            projects.
                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 3001. Cook Inlet, Alaska.
Sec. 3002. King Cove Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 3003. Sitka, Alaska.
Sec. 3004. Tatitlek, Alaska.
Sec. 3005. Rio De Flag, Flagstaff, Arizona.
Sec. 3006. Osceola Harbor, Arkansas.
Sec. 3007. Pine Mountain Dam, Arkansas.
Sec. 3008. American and Sacramento Rivers, California.
Sec. 3009. Compton Creek, California.
Sec. 3010. Grayson Creek/Murderer's Creek, California.
Sec. 3011. Hamilton Airfield, California.
Sec. 3012. John F. Baldwin Ship Channel and Stockton Ship Channel, 
                            California.
Sec. 3013. Kaweah River, California.
Sec. 3014. Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, California.
Sec. 3015. Llagas Creek, California.
Sec. 3016. Magpie Creek, California.
Sec. 3017. Pacific Flyway Center, Sacramento, California.
Sec. 3018. Pinole Creek, California.
Sec. 3019. Prado Dam, California.
Sec. 3020. Sacramento and American Rivers Flood Control, California.
Sec. 3021. Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, California.
Sec. 3022. Santa Cruz Harbor, California.
Sec. 3023. Seven Oaks Dam, California.
Sec. 3024. Upper Guadalupe River, California.
Sec. 3025. Walnut Creek Channel, California.
Sec. 3026. Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase I, California.
Sec. 3027. Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase II, California.
Sec. 3028. Yuba River Basin project, California.
Sec. 3029. South Platte River Basin, Colorado.
Sec. 3030. Intracoastal Waterway, Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, 
                            Delaware and Maryland.
Sec. 3031. Brevard County, Florida.
Sec. 3032. Broward County and Hillsboro Inlet, Florida.
Sec. 3033. Canaveral Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 3034. Gasparilla and Estero Islands, Florida.
Sec. 3035. Jacksonville Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 3036. Lido Key Beach, Sarasota, Florida.
Sec. 3037. Miami Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 3038. Peanut Island, Florida.
Sec. 3039. Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida.
Sec. 3040. Tampa Harbor Cut B, Florida.
Sec. 3041. Allatoona Lake, Georgia.
Sec. 3042. Latham River, Glynn County, Georgia.
Sec. 3043. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir improvements, Idaho.
Sec. 3044. Beardstown Community Boat Harbor, Beardstown, Illinois.
Sec. 3045. Cache River Levee, Illinois.
Sec. 3046. Chicago River, Illinois.
Sec. 3047. Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal dispersal barriers project, 
                            Illinois.
Sec. 3048. Emiquon, Illinois.
Sec. 3049. Lasalle, Illinois.
Sec. 3050. Spunky Bottoms, Illinois.
Sec. 3051. Fort Wayne and vicinity, Indiana.
Sec. 3052. Koontz Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 3053. White River, Indiana.
Sec. 3054. Des Moines River and Greenbelt, Iowa.
Sec. 3055. Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
Sec. 3056. Prestonsburg, Kentucky.
Sec. 3057. Amite River and tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge 
                            Parish Watershed.
Sec. 3058. Atchafalaya Basin, Louisiana.
Sec. 3059. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, Louisiana.
Sec. 3060. Bayou Plaquemine, Louisiana.
Sec. 3061. J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, Mississippi River to 
                            Shreveport, Louisiana.
Sec. 3062. Melville, Louisiana.
Sec. 3063. Mississippi Delta Region, Louisiana.
Sec. 3064. New Orleans to Venice, Louisiana.
Sec. 3065. West bank of the Mississippi River (East of Harvey Canal), 
                            Louisiana.
Sec. 3066. Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine.
Sec. 3067. Detroit River Shoreline, Detroit, Michigan.
Sec. 3068. St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan.
Sec. 3069. St. Joseph Harbor, Michigan.
Sec. 3070. Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan.
Sec. 3071. Ada, Minnesota.
Sec. 3072. Duluth Harbor, McQuade Road, Minnesota.
Sec. 3073. Grand Marais, Minnesota.
Sec. 3074. Grand Portage Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3075. Granite Falls, Minnesota.
Sec. 3076. Knife River Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3077. Red Lake River, Minnesota.
Sec. 3078. Silver Bay, Minnesota.
Sec. 3079. Taconite Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3080. Two Harbors, Minnesota.
Sec. 3081. Deer Island, Harrison County, Mississippi.
Sec. 3082. Pearl River Basin, Mississippi.
Sec. 3083. Festus and Crystal City, Missouri.
Sec. 3084. L-15 levee, Missouri.
Sec. 3085. Monarch-Chesterfield, Missouri.
Sec. 3086. River Des Peres, Missouri.
Sec. 3087. Antelope Creek, Lincoln, Nebraska.
Sec. 3088. Sand Creek Watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska.
Sec. 3089. Western Sarpy and Clear Creek, Nebraska.
Sec. 3090. Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey.
Sec. 3091. Passaic River Basin flood management, New Jersey.
Sec. 3092. Buffalo Harbor, New York.
Sec. 3093. Orchard Beach, Bronx, New York.
Sec. 3094. Port of New York and New Jersey, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 3095. New York State Canal System.
Sec. 3096. Lower Girard Lake Dam, Ohio.
Sec. 3097. Mahoning River, Ohio.
Sec. 3098. Delaware River, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware.
Sec. 3099. Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3100. Sheraden Park Stream and Chartiers Creek, Allegheny County, 
                            Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3101. Solomon's Creek, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3102. South Central Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3103. Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3104. Cedar Bayou, Texas.
Sec. 3105. Freeport Harbor, Texas.
Sec. 3106. Lake Kemp, Texas.
Sec. 3107. Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas.
Sec. 3108. North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas.
Sec. 3109. Pat Mayse Lake, Texas.
Sec. 3110. Proctor Lake, Texas.
Sec. 3111. San Antonio Channel, San Antonio, Texas.
Sec. 3112. Tangier Island Seawall, Virginia.
Sec. 3113. Duwamish/Green, Washington.
Sec. 3114. Yakima River, Port of Sunnyside, Washington.
Sec. 3115. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 3116. Greenbrier River Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 3117. Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp, West Virginia.
Sec. 3118. Northern West Virginia.
Sec. 3119. Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin.
Sec. 3120. Mississippi River headwaters reservoirs.
Sec. 3121. Continuation of project authorizations.
Sec. 3122. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 3123. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 3124. Land conveyances.
Sec. 3125. Extinguishment of reversionary interests and use 
                            restrictions.
                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 4001. John Glenn Great Lakes Basin Program.
Sec. 4002. Lake Erie dredged material disposal sites.
Sec. 4003. Southwestern United States drought study.
Sec. 4004. Delaware River.
Sec. 4005. Knik Arm, Cook Inlet, Alaska.
Sec. 4006. Kuskokwim River, Alaska.
Sec. 4007. St. George Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 4008. Susitna River, Alaska.
Sec. 4009. Gila Bend, Maricopa, Arizona.
Sec. 4010. Searcy County, Arkansas.
Sec. 4011. Aliso Creek, California.
Sec. 4012. Elkhorn Slough Estuary, California.
Sec. 4013. Fresno, Kings, and Kern Counties, California.
Sec. 4014. Los Angeles River revitalization study, California.
Sec. 4015. Lytle Creek, Rialto, California.
Sec. 4016. Mokelumne River, San Joaquin County, California.
Sec. 4017. Napa River, St. Helena, California.
Sec. 4018. Orick, California.
Sec. 4019. Rialto, Fontana, and Colton, California.
Sec. 4020. Sacramento River, California.
Sec. 4021. San Diego County, California.
Sec. 4022. San Francisco Bay, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California.
Sec. 4023. South San Francisco Bay shoreline study, California.
Sec. 4024. Twentynine Palms, California.
Sec. 4025. Yucca Valley, California.
Sec. 4026. Roaring Fork River, Basalt, Colorado.
Sec. 4027. Delaware and Christina Rivers and Shellpot Creek, 
                            Wilmington, Delaware.
Sec. 4028. Collier County Beaches, Florida.
Sec. 4029. Lower St. Johns River, Florida.
Sec. 4030. Vanderbilt Beach Lagoon, Florida.
Sec. 4031. Meriwether County, Georgia.
Sec. 4032. Tybee Island, Georgia.
Sec. 4033. Boise River, Idaho.
Sec. 4034. Ballard's Island Side Channel, Illinois.
Sec. 4035. Salem, Indiana.
Sec. 4036. Buckhorn Lake, Kentucky.
Sec. 4037. Dewey Lake, Kentucky.
Sec. 4038. Louisville, Kentucky.
Sec. 4039. Clinton River, Michigan.
Sec. 4040. Hamburg and Green Oak Townships, Michigan.
Sec. 4041. Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Sec. 4042. Northeast Mississippi.
Sec. 4043. St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 4044. Dredged material disposal, New Jersey.
Sec. 4045. Bayonne, New Jersey.
Sec. 4046. Carteret, New Jersey.
Sec. 4047. Gloucester County, New Jersey.
Sec. 4048. Perth Amboy, New Jersey.
Sec. 4049. Batavia, New York.
Sec. 4050. Big Sister Creek, Evans, New York.
Sec. 4051. Finger Lakes, New York.
Sec. 4052. Lake Erie Shoreline, Buffalo, New York.
Sec. 4053. Newtown Creek, New York.
Sec. 4054. Niagara River, New York.
Sec. 4055. Shore Parkway Greenway, Brooklyn, New York.
Sec. 4056. Upper Delaware River Watershed, New York.
Sec. 4057. Lincoln County, North Carolina.
Sec. 4058. Wilkes County, North Carolina.
Sec. 4059. Yadkinville, North Carolina.
Sec. 4060. Lake Erie, Ohio.
Sec. 4061. Ohio River, Ohio.
Sec. 4062. Ecosystem restoration and fish passage improvements, Oregon.
Sec. 4063. Walla Walla River Basin, Oregon.
Sec. 4064. Chartiers Creek Watershed, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4065. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4066. Western Pennsylvania flood damage reduction, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4067. Williamsport, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4068. Yardley Borough, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4069. Rio Valenciano, Juncos, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 4070. Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, South Carolina.
Sec. 4071. Broad River, York County, South Carolina.
Sec. 4072. Chattanooga, Tennessee.
Sec. 4073. Cleveland, Tennessee.
Sec. 4074. Cumberland River, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sec. 4075. Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne Counties, Tennessee.
Sec. 4076. Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek, Memphis Tennessee.
Sec. 4077. Abilene, Texas.
Sec. 4078. Coastal Texas ecosystem protection and restoration, Texas.
Sec. 4079. Port of Galveston, Texas.
Sec. 4080. Grand County and Moab, Utah.
Sec. 4081. Southwestern Utah.
Sec. 4082. Chowan River Basin, Virginia and North Carolina.
Sec. 4083. Elliott Bay Seawall, Seattle, Washington.
Sec. 4084. Monongahela River Basin, northern West Virginia.
Sec. 4085. Kenosha Harbor, Wisconsin.
Sec. 4086. Wauwatosa, Wisconsin.
Sec. 4087. Johnsonville Dam, Johnsonville, Wisconsin.
                         TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS

Sec. 5001. Maintenance of navigation channels.
Sec. 5002. Watershed management.
Sec. 5003. Dam safety.
Sec. 5004. Structural integrity evaluations.
Sec. 5005. Flood mitigation priority areas.
Sec. 5006. Additional assistance for authorized projects.
Sec. 5007. Expedited completion of reports and construction for certain 
                            projects.
Sec. 5008. Expedited completion of reports for certain projects.
Sec. 5009. Southeastern water resources assessment.
Sec. 5010. Upper Mississippi River environmental management program.
Sec. 5011. Missouri and Middle Mississippi River enhancement project.
Sec. 5012. Great Lakes fishery and ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 5013. Great Lakes remedial action plans and sediment remediation.
Sec. 5014. Great Lakes tributary models.
Sec. 5015. Great Lakes navigation.
Sec. 5016. Great lakes pilot project.
Sec. 5017. Saint Lawrence Seaway.
Sec. 5018. Upper Mississippi River dispersal barrier project.
Sec. 5019. Susquehanna, Delaware, and Potomac River Basins, Delaware, 
                            Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.
Sec. 5020. Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and protection 
                            program.
Sec. 5021. Hypoxia assessment.
Sec. 5022. Potomac River watershed assessment and tributary strategy 
                            evaluation and monitoring program.
Sec. 5023. Lock and dam security.
Sec. 5024. Rehabilitation.
Sec. 5025. Research and development program for Columbia and Snake 
                            River salmon survival.
Sec. 5026. Auburn, Alabama.
Sec. 5027. Pinhook Creek, Huntsville, Alabama.
Sec. 5028. Alaska.
Sec. 5029. Barrow, Alaska.
Sec. 5030. Coffman Cove, Alaska.
Sec. 5031. Fire Island, Alaska.
Sec. 5032. Fort Yukon, Alaska.
Sec. 5033. Kotzebue Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 5034. Lowell Creek Tunnel, Seward, Alaska.
Sec. 5035. St. Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, Alaska.
Sec. 5036. Tanana River, Alaska.
Sec. 5037. Valdez, Alaska.
Sec. 5038. Whittier, Alaska.
Sec. 5039. Wrangell Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 5040. Augusta and Clarendon, Arkansas.
Sec. 5041. Des Arc levee protection, Arkansas.
Sec. 5042. Loomis Landing, Arkansas.
Sec. 5043. St. Francis River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.
Sec. 5044. Cambria, California.
Sec. 5045. Contra Costa Canal, Oakley and Knightsen, California; 
                            Mallard Slough, Pittsburg, California.
Sec. 5046. Dana Point Harbor, California.
Sec. 5047. East San Joaquin County, California.
Sec. 5048. Eastern Santa Clara basin, California.
Sec. 5049. Lancaster, California.
Sec. 5050. Los Osos, California.
Sec. 5051. Pine Flat Dam and Reservoir, California.
Sec. 5052. Raymond Basin, Six Basins, Chino Basin, and San Gabriel 
                            Basin, California.
Sec. 5053. San Francisco, California.
Sec. 5054. San Francisco, California, waterfront area.
Sec. 5055. San Pablo Bay, California, watershed and Suisun Marsh 
                            ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 5056. Stockton, California.
Sec. 5057. Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater, New Haven Harbor, 
                            Connecticut.
Sec. 5058. Florida Keys water quality improvements.
Sec. 5059. Lake Worth, Florida.
Sec. 5060. East Central and Northeast Florida.
Sec. 5061. Lake Lanier, Georgia.
Sec. 5062. Riley Creek Recreation Area, Idaho.
Sec. 5063. Reconstruction of Illinois flood protection projects.
Sec. 5064. Illinois River Basin restoration.
Sec. 5065. Kaskaskia River Basin, Illinois, restoration.
Sec. 5066. Floodplain mapping, Little Calumet River, Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 5067. Promontory Point, Lake Michigan, Illinois.
Sec. 5068. Southwest Illinois.
Sec. 5069. Burns Waterway Harbor, Indiana.
Sec. 5070. Calumet region, Indiana.
Sec. 5071. Floodplain mapping, Missouri River, Iowa.
Sec. 5072. Paducah, Kentucky.
Sec. 5073. Southern and eastern Kentucky.
Sec. 5074. Winchester, Kentucky.
Sec. 5075. Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Sec. 5076. Calcasieu Ship Channel, Louisiana.
Sec. 5077. East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin Region, 
                            Louisiana.
Sec. 5078. West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 5079. Charlestown, Maryland.
Sec. 5080. Anacostia River, District of Columbia and Maryland.
Sec. 5081. Delmarva Conservation Corridor, Delaware and Maryland.
Sec. 5082. Massachusetts dredged material disposal sites.
Sec. 5083. Ontonagon Harbor, Michigan.
Sec. 5084. Crookston, Minnesota.
Sec. 5085. Garrison and Kathio Township, Minnesota.
Sec. 5086. Itasca County, Minnesota.
Sec. 5087. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sec. 5088. Northeastern Minnesota.
Sec. 5089. Wild Rice River, Minnesota.
Sec. 5090. Harrison, Hancock, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi.
Sec. 5091. Mississippi River, Missouri and Illinois.
Sec. 5092. St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 5093. Hackensack Meadowlands area, New Jersey.
Sec. 5094. Atlantic Coast of New York.
Sec. 5095. College Point, New York City, New York.
Sec. 5096. Flushing Bay and Creek, New York City, New York.
Sec. 5097. Hudson River, New York.
Sec. 5098. Mount Morris Dam, New York.
Sec. 5099. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina.
Sec. 5100. Stanly County, North Carolina.
Sec. 5101. Cincinnati, Ohio.
Sec. 5102. Toussaint River, Ohio.
Sec. 5103. Eugene, Oregon.
Sec. 5104. Fern Ridge Dam, Oregon.
Sec. 5105. Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5106. Clinton county, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5107. Kehly Run Dams, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5108. Lehigh River, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5109. Northeast Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5110. Upper Susquehanna River Basin, Pennsylvania and New York.
Sec. 5111. Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 5112. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, and 
                            terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration, 
                            South Dakota.
Sec. 5113. East Tennessee.
Sec. 5114. Fritz Landing, Tennessee.
Sec. 5115. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Tennessee.
Sec. 5116. Town Creek, Lenoir City, Tennessee.
Sec. 5117. Tennessee River partnership.
Sec. 5118. Upper Mississippi embayment, Tennessee, Arkansas, and 
                            Mississippi.
Sec. 5119. Bosque River Watershed, Texas.
Sec. 5120. Dallas County region, Texas.
Sec. 5121. Dallas Floodway, Dallas Texas.
Sec. 5122. Harris County, Texas.
Sec. 5123. Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas.
Sec. 5124. Onion Creek, Texas.
Sec. 5125. Eastern Shore and southwest Virginia.
Sec. 5126. Dyke Marsh, Fairfax County, Virginia.
Sec. 5127. Baker Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington.
Sec. 5128. Hamilton Island campground, Washington.
Sec. 5129. Puget Island, Washington.
Sec. 5130. Willapa Bay, Washington.
Sec. 5131. West Virginia and Pennsylvania flood control.
Sec. 5132. Central West Virginia.
Sec. 5133. Southern West Virginia.
Sec. 5134. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal 
                            interests.
Sec. 5135. Wage surveys.
Sec. 5136. Additional assistance for critical projects.
                      TITLE VI--FLORIDA EVERGLADES

Sec. 6001. Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida.
Sec. 6002. Pilot projects.
Sec. 6003. Initial projects.
Sec. 6004. Maximum costs.
Sec. 6005. Project authorization.
Sec. 6006. Credit.
Sec. 6007. Outreach and assistance.
Sec. 6008. Critical restoration projects.
Sec. 6009. Modified water deliveries.
Sec. 6010. Deauthorizations.
Sec. 6011. Regional engineering model for environmental restoration.
                   TITLE VII--LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA

Sec. 7001. Definitions.
Sec. 7002. Comprehensive plan.
Sec. 7003. Louisiana coastal area.
Sec. 7004. Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task 
                            Force.
Sec. 7005. Project modifications.
Sec. 7006. Construction.
Sec. 7007. Non-Federal cost share.
Sec. 7008. Project justification.
Sec. 7009. Independent review.
Sec. 7010. Expedited reports.
Sec. 7011. Reporting.
Sec. 7012. New Orleans and vicinity.
Sec. 7013. Mississippi River Gulf Outlet.
   TITLE VIII--UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATER-WAY SYSTEM

Sec. 8001. Definitions.
Sec. 8002. Navigation improvements and restoration.
Sec. 8003. Authorization of construction of navigation improvements.
Sec. 8004. Ecosystem restoration authorization.
Sec. 8005. Comparable progress.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.

    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the 
Army.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 1001. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    Except as otherwise provided in this section, the following 
projects for water resources development and conservation and other 
purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary 
substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the 
conditions, described in the respective reports designated in this 
section:
            (1) Haines, alaska.--The project for navigation, Haines, 
        Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 20, 
        2004, at a total cost of $14,040,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $11,232,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $2,808,000.
            (2) Port lions, alaska.--The project for navigation, Port 
        Lions, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 14, 
        2006, at a total cost of $9,530,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $7,624,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $1,906,000.
            (3) Rio salado oeste, arizona.--The project for 
        environmental restoration, Rio Salado Oeste, Arizona: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost 
        of $166,650,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $106,629,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $60,021,000.
            (4) Santa cruz river, paseo de las iglesias, arizona.--The 
        project for environmental restoration, Santa Cruz River, Pima 
        County, Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 
        28, 2006, at a total cost of $97,700,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $63,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $34,400,000.
            (5) Tanque verde creek, pima county, arizona.--The project 
        for environmental restoration, Tanque Verde Creek, Pima County, 
        Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 22, 2003, 
        at a total cost of $5,906,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
        of $3,836,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,070,000.
            (6) Salt river (va shlyay' akimel), maricopa county, 
        arizona.--The project for environmental restoration, Salt River 
        (Va Shlyay' Akimel), Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated January 3, 2005, at a total cost of $162,100,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $105,200,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $56,900,000.
            (7) May branch, fort smith, arkansas.--The project for 
        flood damage reduction, May Branch, Fort Smith, Arkansas, 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a 
        total cost of $30,850,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $15,010,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $15,840,000.
            (8) Hamilton city, california.--The project for flood 
        damage reduction and environmental restoration, Hamilton City, 
        California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 
        2004, at a total cost of $52,400,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $34,100,000 and estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $18,300,000.
            (9) Imperial beach, california.--The project for storm 
        damage reduction, Imperial Beach, California: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated December 30, 2003, at a total cost of 
        $13,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $8,521,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,179,000, and at an 
        estimated total cost of $42,500,000 for periodic beach 
        nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $21,250,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $21,250,000.
            (10) Matilija dam, ventura county, california.--The project 
        for environmental restoration, Matilija Dam, Ventura County, 
        California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 20, 
        2004, at a total cost of $144,500,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $89,700,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $54,800,000.
            (11) Middle creek, lake county, california.--The project 
        for flood damage reduction and environmental restoration, 
        Middle Creek, Lake County, California: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated November 29, 2004, at a total cost of 
        $45,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $29,500,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $15,700,000.
            (12) Napa river salt marsh restoration, california.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for environmental 
                restoration, Napa River Salt Marsh Restoration, Napa, 
                California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
                December 22, 2004, at a total cost of $134,500,000, 
                with an estimated Federal cost of $87,500,000 and an 
                estimated non-Federal cost of $47,000,000.
                    (B) Administration.--In carrying out the project 
                authorized by this paragraph, the Secretary shall--
                            (i) construct a recycled water pipeline 
                        extending from the Sonoma Valley County 
                        Sanitation District Waste Water Treatment Plant 
                        and the Napa Sanitation District Waste Water 
                        Treatment Plant to the project; and
                            (ii) restore or enhance Salt Ponds 1, 1A, 
                        2, and 3.
            (13) Denver county reach, south platte river, denver, 
        colorado.--The project for environmental restoration, Denver 
        County Reach, South Platte River, Denver, Colorado: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated May 16, 2003, at a total cost of 
        $21,050,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,680,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,370,000.
            (14) Miami harbor, miami-dade county, florida.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for navigation, Miami 
                Harbor, Miami-Dade County, Florida: Report of the Chief 
                of Engineers dated April 25, 2005, at a total cost of 
                $125,270,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $75,140,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $50,130,000.
                    (B) General reevaluation report.--The non-Federal 
                share of the cost of the general reevaluation report 
                that resulted in the report of the Chief of Engineers 
                referred to in subparagraph (A) shall be the same 
                percentage as the non-Federal share of cost of 
                construction of the project.
                    (C) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into a 
                new partnership with the non-Federal interest to 
                reflect the cost sharing required by subparagraph (B).
            (15) East st. louis and vicinity, illinois.--The project 
        for environmental restoration and recreation, East St. Louis 
        and Vicinity, Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        December 22, 2004, at a total cost of $208,260,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $134,910,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $73,350,000.
            (16) Peoria riverfront development, illinois.--The project 
        for environmental restoration, Peoria Riverfront Development, 
        Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 28, 2003, 
        at a total cost of $18,220,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
        of $11,840,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,380,000.
            (17) Wood river levee system reconstruction, madison 
        county, illinois.--The project for flood damage reduction, Wood 
        River Levee System Reconstruction, Madison County, Illinois: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 18, 2006, at a 
        total cost of $17,220,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $11,193,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,027,000.
            (18) Des moines and raccoon rivers, des moines, iowa.--The 
        project for flood damage reduction, Des Moines and Raccoon 
        Rivers, Des Moines, Iowa: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated March 28, 2006, at a total cost of $10,780,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $6,967,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $3,813,000.
            (19) Licking river basin, cynthiana, kentucky.--The project 
        for flood damage reduction, Licking River Basin, Cynthiana, 
        Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 24, 
        2006, at a total cost of $18,200,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $11,830,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $6,370,000.
            (20) Bayou sorrel lock, louisiana.--The project for 
        navigation, Bayou Sorrel Lock, Louisiana: Report of the Chief 
        of Engineers dated January 3, 2005, at a total cost of 
        $9,680,000. The costs of construction of the project are to be 
        paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the general fund of 
        the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the 
        Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
            (21) Morganza to the gulf of mexico, louisiana.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for hurricane and 
                storm damage reduction, Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico, 
                Louisiana: Reports of the Chief of Engineers dated 
                August 23, 2002, and July 22, 2003, at a total cost of 
                $886,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $576,355,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $310,345,000.
                    (B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the 
                non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 
                of design and construction work carried out by the non-
                Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
                agreement for the project if the Secretary determines 
                that the work is integral to the project.
                    (C) Operation and maintenance.--The operation, 
                maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of 
                the Houma Navigation Canal lock complex and the Gulf 
                Intracoastal Waterway floodgate features that provide 
                for inland waterway transportation shall be a Federal 
                responsibility in accordance with section 102 of the 
                Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
                2212).
            (22) Port of iberia, louisiana.--The project for 
        navigation, Port of Iberia, Louisiana, Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated December 31, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $131,250,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $105,315,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $25,935,000.
            (23) Smith island, somerset county, maryland.--The project 
        for environmental restoration, Smith Island, Somerset County, 
        Maryland: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 29, 
        2001, at a total cost of $15,580,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $10,127,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $5,453,000.
            (24) Roseau river, roseau, minnesota.--The project for 
        flood damage reduction, Roseau River, Roseau, Minnesota, Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total 
        cost of $25,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $13,820,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,280,000.
            (25) Mississippi coastal, mississippi.--The project for 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction and environmental 
        restoration, Mississippi Coastal, Mississippi, Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated December 31, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $107,690,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $70,000,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $37,690,000.
            (26) Kansas citys levees, missouri and kansas.--The project 
        for flood damage reduction, Kansas Citys levees, Missouri and 
        Kansas, Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 
        2006, at a total cost of $65,430,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $42,530,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $22,900,000.
            (27) Swope park industrial area, blue river, kansas city, 
        missouri.--The project for flood damage reduction, Swope Park 
        Industrial Area, Blue River, Kansas City, Missouri: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated December 30, 2003, at a total cost 
        of $16,980,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,037,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,943,000.
            (28) Great egg harbor inlet to townsends inlet, new 
        jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
        Great Egg Harbor Inlet to Townsends Inlet, New Jersey: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated October 24, 2006, at a total 
        cost of $54,360,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $35,069,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $19,291,000, 
        and at an estimated total cost of $202,500,000 for periodic 
        nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $101,250,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $101,250,000.
            (29) Hudson raritan estuary, liberty state park, new 
        jersey.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for environmental 
                restoration, Hudson Raritan Estuary, Liberty State 
                Park, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
                dated August 25, 2006, at a total cost of $34,100,000, 
                with an estimated Federal cost of $22,200,000 and an 
                estimated non-Federal cost of $11,900,000.
                    (B) Restoration teams.--In carrying out the 
                project, the Secretary shall establish and utilize 
                watershed restoration teams composed of estuary 
                restoration experts from the Corps of Engineers, the 
                New Jersey department of environmental protection, and 
                the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and other 
                experts designated by the Secretary for the purpose of 
                developing habitat restoration and water quality 
                enhancement.
            (30) Manasquan inlet to barnegat inlet, new jersey.--The 
        project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Manasquan 
        Inlet to Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated December 30, 2003, at a total cost of 
        $71,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $46,735,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $25,165,000, and at an 
        estimated total cost of $119,680,000 for periodic beach 
        nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $59,840,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $59,840,000.
            (31) Raritan bay and sandy hook bay, union beach, new 
        jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
        Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, Union Beach, New Jersey: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated January 4, 2006, at a total 
        cost of $115,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $74,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $40,200,000, 
        and at an estimated total cost of $6,500,000 for periodic 
        nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $3,250,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $3,250,000.
            (32) South river, raritan river basin, new jersey.--The 
        project for hurricane and storm damage reduction and 
        environmental restoration, South River, Raritan River Basin, 
        New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 22, 
        2003, at a total cost of $122,300,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $79,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $42,800,000.
            (33) Southwest valley, bernalillo county, new mexico.--The 
        project for flood damage reduction, Southwest Valley, 
        Bernalillo County, New Mexico: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated November 29, 2004, at a total cost of $24,840,000, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $16,150,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $8,690,000.
            (34) Montauk point, new york.--The project for hurricane 
        and storm damage reduction, Montauk Point, New York: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated March 31, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $14,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,300,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,300,000.
            (35) Hocking river, monday creek sub-basin, ohio.--The 
        project for environmental restoration, Hocking River, Monday 
        Creek Sub-basin, Ohio: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        August 24, 2006, at a total cost of $20,980,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $13,440,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $7,540,000.
            (36) Town of bloomsburg, columbia county, pennsylvania.--
        The project for flood damage reduction, town of Bloomsburg, 
        Columbia County, Pennsylvania: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated January 25, 2006, at a total cost of $44,500,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $28,925,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $15,575,000.
            (37) Pawley's island, south carolina.--The project for 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction, Pawley's Island, South 
        Carolina, Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 
        2006, at a total cost of $8,980,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $5,840,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $3,140,000, and at an estimated total cost of $21,200,000 for 
        periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $10,600,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $10,600,000.
            (38) Corpus christi ship channel, corpus christi, texas.--
        The project for navigation and ecosystem restoration, Corpus 
        Christi Ship Channel, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated June 2, 2003, at a total cost of $188,110,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $87,810,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $100,300,000.
            (39) Gulf intracoastal waterway, matagorda bay re-route, 
        texas.--The project for navigation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, 
        Matagorda Bay Re-Route, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated December 24, 2002, at a total cost of $17,280,000. The 
        costs of construction of the project are to be paid \1/2\ from 
        amounts appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and 
        \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust 
        Fund.
            (40) Gulf intracoastal waterway, high island to brazos 
        river, texas.--The project for navigation, Gulf Intracoastal 
        Waterway, High Island to Brazos River, Texas: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated April 16, 2004, at a total cost of 
        $14,450,000. The costs of construction of the project are to be 
        paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the general fund of 
        the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the 
        Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
            (41) Lower colorado river basin phase i, texas.--The 
        project for flood damage reduction and environmental 
        restoration, Lower Colorado River Basin Phase I, Texas, Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated December 31, 2006, at a total 
        cost of $110,730,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $69,640,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $41,090,000.
            (42) Riverside oxbow, texas.--The project for environmental 
        restoration, Riverside Oxbow, Texas: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated May 29, 2003, at a total cost of $27,110,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $11,210,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $15,900,000.
            (43) Atlantic intracoastal waterway bridge replacement, 
        deep creek, chesapeake, virginia.--The project for Atlantic 
        Intracoastal Waterway Bridge Replacement, Deep Creek, 
        Chesapeake, Virginia: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        March 3, 2003, at a total cost of $37,200,000.
            (44) Craney island eastward expansion, norfolk harbor and 
        channels, virginia.--The project for navigation, Craney Island 
        Eastward Expansion, Norfolk Harbor and Channels, Virginia: 
        Report of Chief of Engineers dated October 24, 2006, at a total 
        cost of $712,103,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $31,229,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $680,874,000.

SEC. 1002. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of 
the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project 
is feasible, may carry out the project under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s):
            (1) Haleyville, alabama.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Haleyville, Alabama.
            (2) Weiss lake, alabama.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Weiss Lake, Alabama.
            (3) Little colorado river levee, arizona.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Little Colorado River Levee, Arizona.
            (4) Cache river basin, grubbs, arkansas.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Cache River Basin, Grubbs, Arkansas.
            (5) Barrel springs wash, palmdale, california.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Barrel Springs Wash, Palmdale, 
        California.
            (6) Borrego springs, california.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Borrego Springs, California.
            (7) Colton, california.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Colton, California.
            (8) Dunlap stream, yucaipa, california.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Dunlap Stream, Yucaipa, California.
            (9) Hunts canyon wash, palmdale, california.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Hunts Canyon Wash, Palmdale, 
        California.
            (10) Ontario and chino, california.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Ontario and Chino, California.
            (11) Santa venetia, california.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Santa Venetia, California.
            (12) Whittier, california.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Whittier, California.
            (13) Wildwood creek, yucaipa, california.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Wildwood Creek, Yucaipa, California.
            (14) St. francisville, lousiana.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, St. Francisville, Louisiana.
            (15) Salem, massachusetts.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Salem, Massachusetts.
            (16) Cass river, michigan.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Cass River, Vassar and vicinity, Michigan.
            (17) Crow river, rockford, minnesota.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Crow River, Rockford, Minnesota.
            (18) Marsh creek, minnesota.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Marsh Creek, Minnesota.
            (19) South branch of the wild rice river, borup, 
        minnesota.--Project for flood damage reduction, South Branch of 
        the Wild Rice River, Borup, Minnesota.
            (20) Blacksnake creek, st. joseph, missouri.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Blacksnake Creek, St. Joseph, Missouri.
            (21) Acid brook, pompton lakes, new jersey.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Acid Brook, Pompton Lakes, New Jersey.
            (22) Cannisteo river, addison, new york.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Cannisteo River, Addison, New York.
            (23) Cohocton river, campbell, new york.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Cohocton River, Campbell, New York.
            (24) Dry and otter creeks, cortland, new york.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Dry and Otter Creeks, Cortland, New 
        York.
            (25) East river, silver beach, new york city, new york.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, East River, Silver Beach, 
        New York City, New York.
            (26) East valley creek, andover, new york.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, East Valley Creek, Andover, New York.
            (27) Sunnyside brook, westchester county, new york.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, Sunnyside Brook, 
        Westchester County, New York.
            (28) Little yankee run, ohio.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Little Yankee Run, Ohio.
            (29) Little neshaminy creek, warrenton, pennsylvania.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, Little Neshaminy Creek, 
        Warrenton, Pennsylvania.
            (30) Southampton creek watershed, southampton, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood damage reduction, Southampton 
        Creek watershed, Southampton, Pennsylvania.
            (31) Spring creek, lower macungie township, pennsylvania.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, Spring Creek, Lower 
        Macungie Township, Pennsylvania.
            (32) Yardley aqueduct, silver and brock creeks, yardley, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood damage reduction, Yardley 
        Aqueduct, Silver and Brock Creeks, Yardley, Pennsylvania.
            (33) Surfside beach, south carolina.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Surfside Beach and vicinity, South Carolina.
            (34) Congelosi ditch, missouri city, texas.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Congelosi Ditch, Missouri City, Texas.
            (35) Dilley, texas.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
        Dilley, Texas.
    (b) Special Rules.--
            (1) Cache river basin, grubbs, arkansas.--The Secretary may 
        proceed with the project for the Cache River Basin, Grubbs, 
        Arkansas, referred to in subsection (a), notwithstanding that 
        the project is located within the boundaries of the flood 
        control project, Cache River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri, 
        authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950, (64 
        Stat. 172) and modified by section 99 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 41).
            (2) Ontario and chino, california.--The Secretary shall 
        carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Ontario and 
        Chino, California, referred to in subsection (a) if the 
        Secretary determines that the project is feasible.
            (3) Santa venetia, california.--The Secretary shall carry 
        out the project for flood damage reduction, Santa Venetia, 
        California, referred to in subsection (a) if the Secretary 
        determines that the project is feasible and shall allow the 
        non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of the 
        project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the 
        extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying 
        such section is necessary to implement the project.
            (4) Whittier, california.--The Secretary shall carry out 
        the project for flood damage reduction, Whittier, California, 
        referred to in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that 
        the project is feasible.
            (5) Wildwood creek, yucaipa, california.--The Secretary 
        shall review the locally prepared plan for the project for 
        flood damage, Wildwood Creek, California, referred to in 
        subsection (a) and, if the Secretary determines that the plan 
        meets the evaluation and design standards of the Corps of 
        Engineers and that the plan is feasible, the Secretary may use 
        the plan to carry out the project and shall provide credit 
        toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for the 
        cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the 
        date of the partnership agreement for the project if the 
        Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.
            (6) South branch of the wild rice river, borup, 
        minnesota.--In carrying out the project for flood damage 
        reduction, South Branch of the Wild Rice River, Borup, 
        Minnesota, referred to in subsection (a) the Secretary may 
        consider national ecosystem restoration benefits in determining 
        the Federal interest in the project and shall allow the non-
        Federal interest to participate in the financing of the project 
        in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that the 
        Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
        necessary to implement the project.
            (7) Acid brook, pompton lakes, new jersey.--The Secretary 
        shall carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Acid 
        Brook, Pompton Lakes, New Jersey, referred to in subsection (a) 
        if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible.
            (8) Dilley, texas.--The Secretary shall carry out the 
        project for flood damage reduction, Dilley, Texas, referred to 
        in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that the project 
        is feasible.

SEC. 1003. SMALL PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 
1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r):
            (1) Aliso creek, california.--Projects for emergency 
        streambank protection, Aliso Creek, California.
            (2) St. johns bluff training wall, duval county, florida.--
        Project for emergency streambank protection, St. Johns Bluff 
        Training Wall, Duval County, Florida.
            (3) Gulf intracoastal waterway, iberville parish, 
        louisiana.--Projects for emergency streambank restoration, Gulf 
        Intracoastal Waterway, Iberville Parish, Louisiana.
            (4) Ouachita and black rivers, arkansas and louisiana.--
        Projects for emergency streambank protection, Ouachita and 
        Black Rivers, Arkansas and Louisiana.
            (5) Piney point lighthouse, st. mary's county, maryland.--
        Project for emergency streambank protection, Piney Point 
        Lighthouse, St. Mary's County, Maryland.
            (6) Pug hole lake, minnesota.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, Pug Hole Lake, Minnesota.
            (7) Middle fork grand river, gentry county, missouri.--
        Project for emergency streambank protection, Middle Fork Grand 
        River, Gentry County, Missouri.
            (8) Platte river, platte city, missouri.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Platte River, Platte City, 
        Missouri.
            (9) Rush creek, parkville, missouri.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, Rush Creek, Parkville, Missouri, 
        including measures to address degradation of the creek bed.
            (10) Dry and otter creeks, cortland county, new york.--
        Project for emergency streambank protection, Dry and Otter 
        Creeks, Cortland County, New York.
            (11) Keuka lake, hammondsport, new york.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Keuka Lake, Hammondsport, New 
        York.
            (12) Kowawese unique area and hudson river, new windsor, 
        new york.--Project for emergency streambank protection, 
        Kowawese Unique Area and Hudson River, New Windsor, New York.
            (13) Owego creek, tioga county, new york.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Owego Creek, Tioga County, New 
        York.
            (14) Howard road outfall, shelby county, tennessee.--
        Project for emergency streambank protection, Howard Road 
        outfall, Shelby County, Tennessee.
            (15) Mitch farm ditch and lateral d, shelby county, 
        tennessee.--Project for emergency streambank protection, Mitch 
        Farm Ditch and Lateral D, Shelby County, Tennessee.
            (16) Wolf river tributaries, shelby county, tennessee.--
        Project for emergency streambank protection, Wolf River 
        tributaries, Shelby County, Tennessee.
            (17) Johnson creek, arlington, texas.--Project for 
        emergency streambank protection, Johnson Creek, Arlington, 
        Texas.
            (18) Wells river, newbury, vermont.--Project for emergency 
        streambank protection, Wells River, Newbury, Vermont.

SEC. 1004. SMALL PROJECTS FOR NAVIGATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of 
the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project 
is feasible, may carry out the project under section 107 of the River 
and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
            (1) Mississippi river ship channel, louisiana.--Project for 
        navigation, Mississippi River Ship Channel, Louisiana.
            (2) East basin, cape cod canal, sandwich, massachusetts.--
        Project for navigation, East Basin, Cape Cod Canal, Sandwich, 
        Massachusetts.
            (3) Lynn harbor, lynn, massachusetts.--Project for 
        navigation, Lynn Harbor, Lynn, Massachusetts.
            (4) Merrimack river, haverhill, massachusetts.--Project for 
        navigation, Merrimack River, Haverhill, Massachusetts.
            (5) Oak bluffs harbor, oak bluffs, massachusetts.--Project 
        for navigation, Oak Bluffs Harbor, Oak Bluffs, Massachusetts.
            (6) Woods hole great harbor, falmouth, massachusetts.--
        Project for navigation, Woods Hole Great Harbor, Falmouth, 
        Massachusetts.
            (7) Au sable river, michigan.--Project for navigation, Au 
        Sable River in the vicinity of Oscoda, Michigan.
            (8) Traverse city harbor, traverse city, michigan.--Project 
        for navigation, Traverse City Harbor, Traverse City, Michigan.
            (9) Tower harbor, tower, minnesota.--Project for 
        navigation, Tower Harbor, Tower, Minnesota.
            (10) Olcott harbor, olcott, new york.--Project for 
        navigation, Olcott Harbor, Olcott, New York.
    (b) Special Rules.--
            (1) Traverse city harbor, traverse city, michigan.--The 
        Secretary shall review the locally prepared plan for the 
        project for navigation, Traverse City Harbor, Michigan, 
        referred to in subsection (a), and, if the Secretary determines 
        that the plan meets the evaluation and design standards of the 
        Corps of Engineers and that the plan is feasible, the Secretary 
        may use the plan to carry out the project and shall provide 
        credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
        for the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
        before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if 
        the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
        project.
            (2) Tower harbor, tower minnesota.--The Secretary shall 
        carry out the project for navigation, Tower Harbor, Tower, 
        Minnesota, referred to in subsection (a) if the Secretary 
        determines that the project is feasible.

SEC. 1005. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE 
              ENVIRONMENT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
appropriate, may carry out the project under section 1135 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a):
            (1) Ballona creek, los angeles county, california.--Project 
        for improvement of the quality of the environment, Ballona 
        Creek, Los Angeles County, California.
            (2) Ballona lagoon tide gates, marina del rey, 
        california.--Project for improvement of the quality of the 
        environment, Ballona Lagoon Tide Gates, Marina Del Rey, 
        California.
            (3) Ft. george inlet, duval county, florida.--Project for 
        improvement of the quality of the environment, Ft. George 
        Inlet, Duval County, Florida.
            (4) Rathbun lake, iowa.--Project for improvement of the 
        quality of the environment, Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
            (5) Smithville lake, missouri.--Project for improvement of 
        the quality of the environment, Smithville Lake, Missouri.
            (6) Delaware bay, new jersey and delaware.--Project for 
        improvement of the quality of the environment, Delaware Bay, 
        New Jersey and Delaware, for the purpose of oyster restoration.
            (7) Tioga-hammond lakes, pennsylvania.--Project for 
        improvement of the quality of the environment, Tioga-Hammond 
        Lakes, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 1006. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
appropriate, may carry out the project under section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330):
            (1) Cypress creek, montgomery, alabama.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Cypress Creek, Montgomery, 
        Alabama.
            (2) Black lake, alaska.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Black Lake, Alaska, at the head of the Chignik 
        watershed.
            (3) Aliso creek, california.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Aliso Creek, California.
            (4) Ben lomond dam, santa cruz, california.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Ben Lomond Dam, Santa Cruz, 
        California.
            (5) Dockweiler bluffs, los angeles county, california.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Dockweiler Bluffs, 
        Los Angeles County, California.
            (6) Salt river, california.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Salt River, California.
            (7) Santa rosa creek, santa rosa, california.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Santa Rosa Creek in the vicinity 
        of the Prince Memorial Greenway, Santa Rosa, California.
            (8) Stockton deep water ship channel and lower san joaquin 
        river, california.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
        Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel and lower San Joaquin River, 
        California.
            (9) Sweetwater reservoir, san diego county, california.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Sweetwater 
        Reservoir, San Diego County, California, including efforts to 
        address aquatic nuisance species.
            (10) Biscayne bay, florida.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Biscayne Bay, Key Biscayne, Florida.
            (11) Clam bayou and dinkins bayou, sanibel island, 
        florida.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Clam Bayou 
        and Dinkins Bayou, Sanibel Island, Florida.
            (12) Chattahoochee fall line, georgia and alabama.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Chattahoochee Fall Line, 
        Georgia and Alabama.
            (13) Longwood cove, gainesville, georgia.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Longwood Cove, Gainesville, 
        Georgia.
            (14) Lake county, illinois.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Ryerson Forest Preserve Dam, Dam 1A, Dam 1B, and 
        Dam 1C, Lake County, Illinois.
            (15) City park, university lakes, louisiana.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, City Park, University Lakes, 
        Louisiana.
            (16) Mill pond, littleton, massachusetts.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Mill Pond, Littleton, 
        Massachusetts.
            (17) Pine tree brook, milton, massachusetts.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Pine Tree Brook, Milton, 
        Massachusetts.
            (18) Kalamazoo river watershed, battle creek, michigan.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Kalamazoo River 
        watershed, Battle Creek, Michigan.
            (19) Rush lake, minnesota.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Rush Lake, Minnesota.
            (20) South fork of the crow river, hutchinson, minnesota.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, South Fork of the 
        Crow River, Hutchinson, Minnesota.
            (21) St. louis, missouri.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, St. Louis, Missouri.
            (22) Truckee river, reno, nevada.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Truckee River, Reno, Nevada, including 
        features for fish passage for Washoe County.
            (23) Grover's mill pond, new jersey.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Grover's Mill Pond, New Jersey.
            (24) Dugway creek, bratenahl, ohio.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Dugway Creek, Bratenahl, Ohio.
            (25) Johnson creek, gresham, oregon.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Johnson Creek, Gresham, Oregon.
            (26) Beaver creek, beaver and salem, pennsylvania.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Beaver Creek, Beaver and 
        Salem, Pennsylvania.
            (27) Cementon dam, lehigh river, pennsylvania.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Cementon Dam, Lehigh River, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (28) Saucon creek, northampton county, pennsylvania.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Saucon Creek, 
        Northampton County, Pennsylvania.
            (29) Blackstone river, rhode island.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Blackstone River, Rhode Island.
            (30) Wilson branch, cheraw, south carolina.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Wilson Branch, Cheraw, South 
        Carolina.
            (31) White river, bethel, vermont.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, White River, Bethel, Vermont.

SEC. 1007. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SHORELINE PROTECTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores 
of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
426g):
            (1) Nelson lagoon, alaska.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Nelson Lagoon, Alaska.
            (2) Sanibel island, florida.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Sanibel Island, Florida.
            (3) Apra harbor, guam.--Project for shoreline protection, 
        Apra Harbor, Guam.
            (4) Piti, cabras island, guam.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Piti, Cabras Island, Guam.
            (5) Narrows and gravesend bay, upper new york bay, 
        brooklyn, new york.--Project for shoreline protection in the 
        vicinity of the confluence of the Narrows and Gravesend Bay, 
        Upper New York Bay, Shore Parkway Greenway, Brooklyn, New York.
            (6) Delaware river, philadelphia naval shipyard, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for shoreline protection, Delaware River 
        in the vicinity of the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (7) Port aransas, texas.--Project for shoreline protection, 
        Port Aransas, Texas.

SEC. 1008. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SNAGGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for the following project and, 
if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, the Secretary 
may carry out the project under section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 
August 28, 1937 (33 U.S.C. 701g): Project for removal of snags and 
clearing and straightening of channels for flood control, Kowawese 
Unique Area and Hudson River, New Windsor, New York.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 2001. NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTIONS.

    Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2213) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(n) Non-Federal Contributions.--
            ``(1) Prohibition on solicitation of excess 
        contributions.--The Secretary may not--
                    ``(A) solicit contributions from non-Federal 
                interests for costs of constructing authorized water 
                resources projects or measures in excess of the non-
                Federal share assigned to the appropriate project 
                purposes listed in subsections (a), (b), and (c); or
                    ``(B) condition Federal participation in such 
                projects or measures on the receipt of such 
                contributions.
            ``(2) Limitation on statutory construction.--Nothing in 
        this subsection shall be construed to affect the Secretary's 
        authority under section 903(c).''.

SEC. 2002. HARBOR COST SHARING.

    (a) Payments During Construction.--Section 101(a)(1) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a)(1); 100 Stat. 
4082) is amended in each of subparagraphs (B) and (C) by striking ``45 
feet'' and inserting ``53 feet''.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance.--Section 101(b)(1) of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 2211(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``45 feet'' and inserting 
``53 feet''.
    (c) Definitions.--Section 214 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 2241; 100 
Stat. 4108) is amended in each of paragraphs (1) and (3) by striking 
``45 feet'' and inserting ``53 feet''.
    (d) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsections (a), (b), 
and (c) shall apply only to a project, or separable element of a 
project, on which a contract for physical construction has not been 
awarded before October 1, 2003.
    (e) Revision of Partnership Agreement.--The Secretary shall revise 
any partnership agreement entered into after October 1, 2003, for any 
project to which the amendments made by subsections (a), (b), and (c) 
apply to take into account the change in non-Federal participation in 
the project as a result of such amendments.

SEC. 2003. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS.

    Section 214(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2201 note; 114 Stat. 2594; 117 Stat. 1836; 119 Stat. 2169; 120 
Stat. 318; 120 Stat. 3197) is amended by striking ``2008'' and 
inserting ``2010''.

SEC. 2004. NATIONAL SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT AND 
              DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    (a) Extension of Program.--Section 5(a) of the Act entitled ``An 
Act authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting the 
shores of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 
U.S.C. 426h(a)), is amended by striking ``7 years'' and inserting ``10 
years''.
    (b) Extension of Planning, Design, and Construction Phase.--Section 
5(b)(1)(A) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 426h(b)(1)(A)) is amended by striking 
``3 years'' and inserting ``6 years''.
    (c) Cost Sharing; Removal of Projects.--Section 5(b) of such Act 
(33 U.S.C. 426h(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs 
        (5) and (6), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
            ``(3) Cost sharing.--The Secretary may enter into a cost 
        sharing agreement with a non-Federal interest to carry out a 
        project, or a phase of a project, under the erosion control 
        program in cooperation with the non-Federal interest.
            ``(4) Removal of projects.--The Secretary may pay all or a 
        portion of the costs of removing a project, or an element of a 
        project, constructed under the erosion control program if the 
        Secretary determines during the term of the program that the 
        project or element is detrimental to the environment, private 
        property, or public safety.''.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 5(e)(2) of such Act 
(33 U.S.C. 426h(e)(2)) is amended by striking ``$25,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$31,000,000''.

SEC. 2005. SMALL SHORE AND BEACH RESTORATION AND PROTECTION PROJECTS.

    Section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal 
participation in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly owned 
property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), is amended by 
striking ``$3,000,000'' and inserting ``$5,000,000''.

SEC. 2006. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    Section 206(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330) is amended by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting 
``$40,000,000''.

SEC. 2007. SMALL FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECTS.

    Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) is 
amended by striking ``$50,000,000'' and inserting ``$60,000,000''.

SEC. 2008. MODIFICATION OF PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF 
              THE ENVIRONMENT.

    Section 1135(h) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2309a(h)) is amended by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting 
``$30,000,000''.

SEC. 2009. WRITTEN AGREEMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-5b) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Sec. 221'' and inserting the following:

``SEC. 221. WRITTEN AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES 
              PROJECTS.'';

            (2) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:
    ``(a) Cooperation of Non-Federal Interest.--
            ``(1) In general.--After December 31, 1970, the 
        construction of any water resources project, or an acceptable 
        separable element thereof, by the Secretary of the Army, acting 
        through the Chief of Engineers, or by a non-Federal interest 
        where such interest will be reimbursed for such construction 
        under any provision of law, shall not be commenced until each 
        non-Federal interest has entered into a written partnership 
        agreement with the Secretary (or, where appropriate, the 
        district engineer for the district in which the project will be 
        carried out) under which each party agrees to carry out its 
        responsibilities and requirements for implementation or 
        construction of the project or the appropriate element of the 
        project, as the case may be; except that no such agreement 
        shall be required if the Secretary determines that the 
        administrative costs associated with negotiating, executing, or 
        administering the agreement would exceed the amount of the 
        contribution required from the non-Federal interest and are 
        less than $25,000.
            ``(2) Liquidated damages.--A partnership agreement 
        described in paragraph (1) may include a provision for 
        liquidated damages in the event of a failure of one or more 
        parties to perform.
            ``(3) Obligation of future appropriations.--In any 
        partnership agreement described in paragraph (1) and entered 
        into by a State, or a body politic of the State which derives 
        its powers from the State constitution, or a governmental 
        entity created by the State legislature, the agreement may 
        reflect that it does not obligate future appropriations for 
        such performance and payment when obligating future 
        appropriations would be inconsistent with constitutional or 
        statutory limitations of the State or a political subdivision 
        of the State.
            ``(4) Credit for in-kind contributions.--
                    ``(A) In general.--A partnership agreement 
                described in paragraph (1) may provide with respect to 
                a project that the Secretary shall credit toward the 
                non-Federal share of the cost of the project, including 
                a project implemented without specific authorization in 
                law, the value of in-kind contributions made by the 
                non-Federal interest, including--
                            ``(i) the costs of planning (including data 
                        collection), design, management, mitigation, 
                        construction, and construction services that 
                        are provided by the non-Federal interest for 
                        implementation of the project;
                            ``(ii) the value of materials or services 
                        provided before execution of the partnership 
                        agreement, including efforts on constructed 
                        elements incorporated into the project; and
                            ``(iii) the value of materials and services 
                        provided after execution of the partnership 
                        agreement.
                    ``(B) Condition.--The Secretary shall credit an in-
                kind contribution under subparagraph (A) if the 
                Secretary determines that the material or service 
                provided as an in-kind contribution is integral to the 
                project.
                    ``(C) Work performed before partnership 
                agreement.--In any case in which the non-Federal 
                interest is to receive credit under subparagraph 
                (A)(ii) for the cost of work carried out by the non-
                Federal interest and such work has not been carried out 
                as of the date of enactment of this subparagraph, the 
                Secretary and the non-Federal interest shall enter into 
                an agreement under which the non-Federal interest shall 
                carry out such work, and only work carried out 
                following the execution of the agreement shall be 
                eligible for credit.
                    ``(D) Limitations.--Credit authorized under this 
                paragraph for a project--
                            ``(i) shall not exceed the non-Federal 
                        share of the cost of the project;
                            ``(ii) shall not alter any other 
                        requirement that a non-Federal interest provide 
                        lands, easements or rights-of-way, or areas for 
                        disposal of dredged material for the project;
                            ``(iii) shall not alter any requirement 
                        that a non-Federal interest pay a portion of 
                        the costs of construction of the project under 
                        sections 101 and 103 of the Water Resources 
                        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211; 33 
                        U.S.C. 2213); and
                            ``(iv) shall not exceed the actual and 
                        reasonable costs of the materials, services, or 
                        other things provided by the non-Federal 
                        interest, as determined by the Secretary.
                    ``(E) Applicability.--
                            ``(i) In general.--This paragraph shall 
                        apply to water resources projects authorized 
                        after November 16, 1986, including projects 
                        initiated after November 16, 1986, without 
                        specific authorization in law.
                            ``(ii) Limitation.--In any case in which a 
                        specific provision of law provides for a non-
                        Federal interest to receive credit toward the 
                        non-Federal share of the cost of a study for, 
                        or construction or operation and maintenance 
                        of, a water resources project, the specific 
                        provision of law shall apply instead of this 
                        paragraph.''.
    (b) Non-Federal Interest.--Section 221(b) of such Act is amended to 
read as follows:
    ``(b) Definition of Non-Federal Interest.--The term `non-Federal 
interest' means a legally constituted public body (including a 
federally recognized Indian tribe), and a nonprofit entity with the 
consent of the affected local government, that has full authority and 
capability to perform the terms of its agreement and to pay damages, if 
necessary, in the event of failure to perform.''.
    (c) Program Administration.--Section 221 of such Act is further 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (h); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Delegation of Authority.--Not later than September 30, 2008, 
the Secretary shall issue policies and guidelines for partnership 
agreements that delegate to the district engineers, at a minimum--
            ``(1) the authority to approve any policy in a partnership 
        agreement that has appeared in an agreement previously approved 
        by the Secretary;
            ``(2) the authority to approve any policy in a partnership 
        agreement the specific terms of which are dictated by law or by 
        a final feasibility study, final environmental impact 
        statement, or other final decision document for a water 
        resources project;
            ``(3) the authority to approve any partnership agreement 
        that complies with the policies and guidelines issued by the 
        Secretary; and
            ``(4) the authority to sign any partnership agreement for 
        any water resources project unless, within 30 days of the date 
        of authorization of the project, the Secretary notifies the 
        district engineer in which the project will be carried out that 
        the Secretary wishes to retain the prerogative to sign the 
        partnership agreement for that project.
    ``(f) Report to Congress.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
enactment of this subsection, and every year thereafter, the Secretary 
shall submit to Congress a report detailing the following:
            ``(1) The number of partnership agreements signed by 
        district engineers and the number of partnership agreements 
        signed by the Secretary.
            ``(2) For any partnership agreement signed by the 
        Secretary, an explanation of why delegation to the district 
        engineer was not appropriate.
    ``(g) Public Availability.--Not later than 120 days after the date 
of enactment of this subsection, the Chief of Engineers shall--
            ``(1) ensure that each district engineer has made available 
        to the public, including on the Internet, all partnership 
        agreements entered into under this section within the preceding 
        10 years and all partnership agreements for water resources 
        projects currently being carried out in that district; and
            ``(2) make each partnership agreement entered into after 
        such date of enactment available to the public, including on 
        the Internet, not later than 7 days after the date on which 
        such agreement is entered into.''.
    (d) Local Cooperation.--Section 912(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (101 Stat. 4190) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``shall'' the first place it 
                appears and inserting ``may''; and
                    (B) by striking the last sentence; and
            (2) in paragraph (4)--
                    (A) by inserting after ``injunction, for'' the 
                following: ``payment of damages or, for'';
                    (B) by striking ``to collect a civil penalty 
                imposed under this section,''; and
                    (C) by striking ``any civil penalty imposed under 
                this section,'' and inserting ``any damages,''.
    (e) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsections (a), (b), 
and (d) only apply to partnership agreements entered into after the 
date of enactment of this Act; except that, at the request of a non-
Federal interest for a project, the district engineer for the district 
in which the project is located may amend a project partnership 
agreement entered into on or before such date and under which 
construction on the project has not been initiated as of such date of 
enactment for the purpose of incorporating such amendments.
    (f) Partnership and Cooperative Arrangements; References.--
            (1) In general.--A goal of agreements entered into under 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b) shall be to further partnership and cooperative 
        arrangements, and the agreements shall be referred to as 
        ``partnership agreements''.
            (2) References to cooperation agreements.--Any reference in 
        a law, regulation, document, or other paper of the United 
        States to a ``cooperation agreement'' or ``project cooperation 
        agreement'' shall be deemed to be a reference to a 
        ``partnership agreement'' or a ``project partnership 
        agreement'', respectively.
            (3) References to partnership agreements.--Any reference to 
        a ``partnership agreement'' or ``project partnership 
        agreement'' in this Act (other than this section) shall be 
        deemed to be a reference to a ``cooperation agreement'' or a 
        ``project cooperation agreement'', respectively.

SEC. 2010. ASSISTANCE FOR REMEDIATION, RESTORATION, AND REUSE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide to State and local 
governments assessment, planning, and design assistance for 
remediation, environmental restoration, or reuse of areas located 
within the boundaries of such State or local governments where such 
remediation, environmental restoration, or reuse will contribute to the 
improvement of water quality or the conservation of water and related 
resources of drainage basins and watersheds within the United States.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
assistance provided under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2008 through 2012.

SEC. 2011. COMPILATION OF LAWS.

    (a) Compilation of Laws Enacted After November 8, 1966.--Not later 
than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
and the Chief of Engineers shall prepare a compilation of the laws of 
the United States relating to the improvement of rivers and harbors, 
flood damage reduction, beach and shoreline erosion, hurricane and 
storm damage reduction, ecosystem and environmental restoration, and 
other water resources development enacted after November 8, 1966, and 
before January 1, 2008, and have such compilation printed for the use 
of the Department of the Army, Congress, and the general public.
    (b) Reprint of Laws Enacted Before November 8, 1966.--The Secretary 
shall have the volumes containing the laws referred to in subsection 
(a) enacted before November 8, 1966, reprinted.
    (c) Index.--The Secretary shall include an index in each volume 
compiled, and each volume reprinted, pursuant to this section.
    (d) Congressional Copies.--Not later than December 1, 2008, the 
Secretary shall transmit at least 25 copies of each volume compiled, 
and of each volume reprinted, pursuant to this section to each of the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
the Senate.
    (e) Availability.--The Secretary shall ensure that each volume 
compiled, and each volume reprinted, pursuant to this section are 
available through electronic means, including the Internet.

SEC. 2012. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL.

    Section 217 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2326a) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d);
            (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Dredged Material Facility.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may enter into a 
        partnership agreement under section 221 of the Flood Control 
        Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) with one or more non-Federal 
        interests with respect to a water resources project, or group 
        of water resources projects within a geographic region, if 
        appropriate, for the acquisition, design, construction, 
        management, or operation of a dredged material processing, 
        treatment, contaminant reduction, or disposal facility 
        (including any facility used to demonstrate potential 
        beneficial uses of dredged material, which may include 
        effective sediment contaminant reduction technologies) using 
        funds provided in whole or in part by the Federal Government.
            ``(2) Performance.--One or more of the parties to a 
        partnership agreement under this subsection may perform the 
        acquisition, design, construction, management, or operation of 
        a dredged material processing, treatment, contaminant 
        reduction, or disposal facility.
            ``(3) Multiple projects.--If a facility to which this 
        subsection applies serves to manage dredged material from 
        multiple water resources projects located in the geographic 
        region of the facility, the Secretary may combine portions of 
        such projects with appropriate combined costsharing between the 
        various projects in a partnership agreement for the facility 
        under this subsection.
            ``(4) Specified federal funding sources and cost sharing.--
                    ``(A) Specified federal funding.--A partnership 
                agreement with respect to a facility under this 
                subsection shall specify--
                            ``(i) the Federal funding sources and 
                        combined cost-sharing when applicable to 
                        multiple water resources projects; and
                            ``(ii) the responsibilities and risks of 
                        each of the parties relating to present and 
                        future dredged material managed by the 
                        facility.
                    ``(B) Management of sediments.--
                            ``(i) In general.--A partnership agreement 
                        under this subsection may include the 
                        management of sediments from the maintenance 
                        dredging of Federal water resources projects 
                        that do not have partnership agreements.
                            ``(ii) Payments.--A partnership agreement 
                        under this subsection may allow the non-Federal 
                        interest to receive reimbursable payments from 
                        the Federal Government for commitments made by 
                        the non-Federal interest for disposal or 
                        placement capacity at dredged material 
                        processing, treatment, contaminant reduction, 
                        or disposal facilities.
                    ``(C) Credit.--A partnership agreement under this 
                subsection may allow costs incurred by the non-Federal 
                interest before execution of the partnership agreement 
                to be credited in accordance with section 221(a)(4) of 
                the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
                5b(a)(4)).
            ``(5) Credit.--
                    ``(A) Effect on existing agreements.--Nothing in 
                this subsection supersedes or modifies an agreement in 
                effect on the date of enactment of this paragraph 
                between the Federal Government and any non-Federal 
                interest for the cost-sharing, construction, and 
                operation and maintenance of a water resources project.
                    ``(B) Credit for funds.--Subject to the approval of 
                the Secretary and in accordance with law (including 
                regulations and policies) in effect on the date of 
                enactment of this paragraph, a non-Federal interest for 
                a water resources project may receive credit for funds 
                provided for the acquisition, design, construction, 
                management, or operation of a dredged material 
                processing, treatment, contaminant reduction, or 
                disposal facility to the extent the facility is used to 
                manage dredged material from the project.
                    ``(C) Non-federal interest responsibilities.--A 
                non-Federal interest entering into a partnership 
                agreement under this subsection for a facility shall--
                            ``(i) be responsible for providing all 
                        necessary lands, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                        relocations associated with the facility; and
                            ``(ii) receive credit toward the non-
                        Federal share of the cost of the project with 
                        respect to which the agreement is being entered 
                        into for those items.''; and
            (3) in paragraphs (1) and (2)(A) of subsection (d) (as 
        redesignated by paragraph (1))--
                    (A) by inserting ``and maintenance'' after 
                ``operation'' each place it appears; and
                    (B) by inserting ``processing, treatment, 
                contaminant reduction, or'' after ``dredged material'' 
                the first place it appears in each of those paragraphs.

SEC. 2013. WETLANDS MITIGATION.

    In carrying out a water resources project that involves wetlands 
mitigation and that has impacts that occur within the same watershed of 
a mitigation bank, the Secretary, to the maximum extent practicable and 
where appropriate, shall first consider the use of the mitigation bank 
if the bank contains sufficient available credits to offset the impact 
and the bank is approved in accordance with the Federal Guidance for 
the Establishment, Use and Operation of Mitigation Banks (60 Fed. Reg. 
58605) or other applicable Federal law (including regulations).

SEC. 2014. MITIGATION FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE LOSSES.

    (a) Mitigation Plan Contents.--Section 906(d) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(d)) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Contents.--A mitigation plan shall include--
                    ``(A) a description of the physical action to be 
                undertaken to achieve the mitigation objectives within 
                the watershed in which such losses occur and, in any 
                case in which mitigation must take place outside the 
                watershed, a justification detailing the rationale for 
                undertaking the mitigation outside of the watershed;
                    ``(B) a description of the lands or interests in 
                lands to be acquired for mitigation and the basis for a 
                determination that such lands are available for 
                acquisition;
                    ``(C) the type, amount, and characteristics of the 
                habitat being restored;
                    ``(D) success criteria for mitigation based on 
                replacement of lost functions and values of the 
                habitat, including hydrologic and vegetative 
                characteristics; and
                    ``(E) a plan for any necessary monitoring to 
                determine the success of the mitigation, including the 
                cost and duration of any monitoring and, to the extent 
                practicable, the entities responsible for any 
                monitoring.
            ``(4) Responsibility for monitoring.--In any case in which 
        it is not practicable to identify in a mitigation plan for a 
        water resources project, the entity responsible for monitoring 
        at the time of a final report of the Chief of Engineers or 
        other final decision document for the project, such entity 
        shall be identified in the partnership agreement entered into 
        with the non-Federal interest.''.
    (b) Status Report.--
            (1) In general.--Concurrent with the President's submission 
        to Congress of the President's request for appropriations for 
        the Civil Works Program for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall 
        submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 
        the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment 
        and Public Works of the Senate a report on the status of 
        construction of projects that require mitigation under section 
        906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        2283; 100 Stat. 4186) and the status of such mitigation.
            (2) Projects included.--The status report shall include the 
        status of all projects that are under construction, all 
        projects for which the President requests funding for the next 
        fiscal year, and all projects that have completed construction, 
        but have not completed the mitigation required under section 
        906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986.

SEC. 2015. REMOTE AND SUBSISTENCE HARBORS.

    (a) In General.--In conducting a study of harbor and navigation 
improvements, the Secretary may recommend a project without the need to 
demonstrate that the project is justified solely by national economic 
development benefits if the Secretary determines that--
            (1)(A) the community to be served by the project is at 
        least 70 miles from the nearest surface accessible commercial 
        port and has no direct rail or highway link to another 
        community served by a surface accessible port or harbor; or
            (B) the project would be located in the Commonwealth of 
        Puerto Rico, Guam, the State of Hawaii, the Commonwealth of the 
        Northern Mariana Islands, the United States Virgin Islands, or 
        American Samoa;
            (2) the harbor is economically critical such that over 80 
        percent of the goods transported through the harbor would be 
        consumed within the community served by the harbor and 
        navigation improvement; and
            (3) the long-term viability of the community would be 
        threatened without the harbor and navigation improvement.
    (b) Justification.--In considering whether to recommend a project 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider the benefits of the 
project to--
            (1) public health and safety of the local community, 
        including access to facilities designed to protect public 
        health and safety;
            (2) access to natural resources for subsistence purposes;
            (3) local and regional economic opportunities;
            (4) welfare of the local population; and
            (5) social and cultural value to the community.

SEC. 2016. BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

    (a) In General.--Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326) is amended by striking subsections (c) through 
(g) and inserting the following:
    ``(c) In General.--The Secretary may carry out projects to 
transport and place sediment obtained in connection with the 
construction, operation, or maintenance of an authorized water 
resources project at locations selected by a non-Federal entity for use 
in the construction, repair, or rehabilitation of projects determined 
by the Secretary to be in the public interest and associated with 
navigation, flood damage reduction, hydroelectric power, municipal and 
industrial water supply, agricultural water supply, recreation, 
hurricane and storm damage reduction, aquatic plant control, and 
environmental protection and restoration.
    ``(d) Cooperative Agreement.--Any project undertaken pursuant to 
this section shall be initiated only after non-Federal interests have 
entered into an agreement with the Secretary in which the non-Federal 
interests agree to pay the non-Federal share of the cost of 
construction of the project and 100 percent of the cost of operation, 
maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project in 
accordance with section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213).
    ``(e) Special Rule.--Construction of a project under subsection (a) 
for one or more of the purposes of protection, restoration, or creation 
of aquatic and ecologically related habitat, the cost of which does not 
exceed $750,000 and which will be located in a disadvantaged community 
as determined by the Secretary, may be carried out at Federal expense.
    ``(f) Determination of Construction Costs.--Costs associated with 
construction of a project under this section shall be limited solely to 
construction costs that are in excess of those costs necessary to carry 
out the dredging for construction, operation, or maintenance of the 
authorized water resources project in the most cos- effective way, 
consistent with economic, engineering, and environmental criteria.
    ``(g) Selection of Sediment Disposal Method.--In developing and 
carrying out a water resources project involving the disposal of 
sediment, the Secretary may select, with the consent of the non-Federal 
interest, a disposal method that is not the least cost option if the 
Secretary determines that the incremental costs of such disposal method 
are reasonable in relation to the environmental benefits, including the 
benefits to the aquatic environment to be derived from the creation of 
wetlands and control of shoreline erosion. The Federal share of such 
incremental costs shall be determined in accordance with subsections 
(d) and (f).
    ``(h) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any project carried out 
under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit 
entity, with the consent of the affected local government.
    ``(i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $30,000,000 annually for projects under this section of 
which not more than $3,000,000 annually may be used for construction of 
projects described in subsection (e). Such sums shall remain available 
until expended.
    ``(j) Regional Sediment Management Planning.--In consultation with 
appropriate State and Federal agencies, the Secretary may develop, at 
Federal expense, plans for regional management of sediment obtained in 
conjunction with the construction, operation, or maintenance of water 
resources projects, including potential beneficial uses of sediment for 
construction, repair, or rehabilitation of public projects for 
navigation, flood damage reduction, hydroelectric power, municipal and 
industrial water supply, agricultural water supply, recreation, 
hurricane and storm damage reduction, aquatic plant control, and 
environmental protection and restoration.
    ``(k) Use of Funds.--
            ``(1) Non-federal interest.--The non-Federal interest for a 
        project described in this section may use, and the Secretary 
        shall accept, funds provided under any other Federal program, 
        to satisfy, in whole or in part, the non-Federal share of the 
        cost of such project if such funds are authorized to be used to 
        carry out such project.
            ``(2) Other federal agencies.--The non-Federal share of the 
        cost of construction of a project under this section may be met 
        through contributions from a Federal agency made directly to 
        the Secretary, with the consent of the affected local 
        government, if such funds are authorized to be used to carry 
        out such project. Before initiating a project to which this 
        paragraph applies, the Secretary shall enter into an agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest in which the non-Federal interest 
        agrees to pay 100 percent of the cost of operation, 
        maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project.''.
    (b) Repeal.--
            (1) In general.--Section 145 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j) is repealed.
            (2) Hold harmless.--The repeal made by paragraph (1) shall 
        not affect the authority of the Secretary to complete any 
        project being carried out under such section 145 on the day 
        before the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Priority Areas.--In carrying out section 204 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326), the Secretary shall 
give priority to the following:
            (1) A project at Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Arkansas.
            (2) A project at Egmont Key, Florida.
            (3) A project in the vicinity of Calcasieu Ship Channel, 
        Louisiana.
            (4) A project in the vicinity of the Smith Point Park 
        Pavilion and the TWA Flight 800 Memorial, Brookhaven, New York.
            (5) A project in the vicinity of Morehead City, North 
        Carolina.
            (6) A project in the vicinity of Galveston Bay, Texas.
            (7) A project at Benson Beach, Washington.

SEC. 2017. COST-SHARING PROVISIONS FOR CERTAIN AREAS.

    Section 1156 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2310; 100 Stat. 4256) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 1156. COST-SHARING PROVISIONS FOR CERTAIN AREAS.

    ``The Secretary shall waive local cost-sharing requirements up to 
$500,000 for all studies and projects--
            ``(1) in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, American Samoa, 
        Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the 
        United States Virgin Islands;
            ``(2) in Indian country (as defined in section 1151 of 
        title 18, United States Code, and including lands that are 
        within the jurisdictional area of an Oklahoma Indian tribe, as 
        determined by the Secretary of the Interior, and are recognized 
        by the Secretary of the Interior as eligible for trust land 
        status under part 151 of title 25, Code of Federal 
        Regulations); or
            ``(3) on land in the State of Alaska owned by an Alaska 
        Native Regional Corporation or an Alaska Native Village 
        Corporation (as those terms are defined in the Alaska Native 
        Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)) or the 
        Metlakatla Indian community.''.

SEC. 2018. USE OF OTHER FEDERAL FUNDS.

    The non-Federal interest for a water resources study or project may 
use, and the Secretary shall accept, funds provided by a Federal agency 
under any other Federal program, to satisfy, in whole or in part, the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the study or project if such funds are 
authorized to be used to carry out the study or project.

SEC. 2019. REVISION OF PROJECT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT.

    Upon authorization by law of an increase in the maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be allocated for a water resources project or an 
increase in the total cost of a water resources project authorized to 
be carried out by the Secretary, the Secretary shall revise the 
partnership agreement for the project to take into account the change 
in Federal participation in the project.

SEC. 2020. COST SHARING.

    An increase in the maximum amount of Federal funds that may be 
allocated for a water resources project, or an increase in the total 
cost of a water resources project, authorized to be carried out by the 
Secretary shall not affect any cost-sharing requirement applicable to 
the project.

SEC. 2021. EXPEDITED ACTIONS FOR EMERGENCY FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

    The Secretary shall expedite any authorized planning, design, and 
construction of any project for flood damage reduction for an area 
that, within the preceding 5 years, has been subject to flooding that 
resulted in the loss of life and caused damage of sufficient severity 
and magnitude to warrant a declaration of a major disaster by the 
President under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).

SEC. 2022. WATERSHED AND RIVER BASIN ASSESSMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2267a; 114 Stat. 2587-2588; 100 Stat. 4164) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph 
                (4);
                    (B) by striking the period at the end of paragraph 
                (5) and inserting ``;''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) Tuscarawas River Basin, Ohio;
            ``(7) Sauk River Basin, Snohomish and Skagit Counties, 
        Washington;
            ``(8) Niagara River Basin, New York;
            ``(9) Genesee River Basin, New York; and
            ``(10) White River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.'';
            (2) by striking paragraph (1) of subsection (f) and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the 
        costs of an assessment carried out under this section on or 
        after December 11, 2000, shall be 25 percent.''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (g).
    (b) Revision of Partnership Agreement.--The Secretary shall revise 
the partnership agreement for any assessment being carried out under 
such section 729 to take into account the change in non-Federal 
participation in the assessment as a result of the amendments made by 
subsection (a).

SEC. 2023. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.

    (a) Scope.--Section 203(b)(1)(B) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2269(b)(1)(B); 114 Stat. 2589) is amended by 
inserting after ``Code'' the following: ``, and including lands that 
are within the jurisdictional area of an Oklahoma Indian tribe, as 
determined by the Secretary of the Interior, and are recognized by the 
Secretary of the Interior as eligible for trust land status under part 
151 of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 203(e) of such Act is 
amended by striking ``2006'' and inserting ``2012''.

SEC. 2024. WILDFIRE FIREFIGHTING.

    Section 309 of Public Law 102-154 (42 U.S.C. 1856a-1; 105 Stat. 
1034) is amended by inserting ``the Secretary of the Army,'' after 
``the Secretary of Energy,''.

SEC. 2025. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.

    Section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-16) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``(a) The Secretary'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(a) Federal State Cooperation.--
            ``(1) Comprehensive plans.--The Secretary'';
            (2) by inserting after the last sentence in subsection (a) 
        the following:
            ``(2) Technical assistance.--
            ``(A) In general.--At the request of a governmental agency 
        or non-Federal interest, the Secretary may provide, at Federal 
        expense, technical assistance to such agency or non-Federal 
        interest in managing water resources.
            ``(B) Types of assistance.--Technical assistance under this 
        paragraph may include provision and integration of hydrologic, 
        economic, and environmental data and analyses.'';
            (3) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ``this section'' each 
        place it appears and inserting ``subsection (a)(1)'';
            (4) in subsection (b)(3) by striking ``Up to \1/2\ of the'' 
        and inserting ``The'';
            (5) in subsection (c) by striking ``(c) There is'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            ``(1) Federal and state cooperation.--There is'';
            (6) in subsection (c)(1) (as designated by paragraph (5))--
                    (A) by striking ``the provisions of this section'' 
                and inserting ``subsection (a)(1)''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$500,000'' and inserting 
                ``$1,000,000'';
            (7) by inserting at the end of subsection (c) the 
        following:
            ``(2) Technical assistance.--There is authorized to be 
        appropriated $5,000,000 annually to carry out subsection 
        (a)(2), of which not more than $2,000,000 annually may be used 
        by the Secretary to enter into cooperative agreements with 
        nonprofit organizations to provide assistance to rural and 
        small communities.'';
            (8) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (9) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Annual Submission of Proposed Activities.--Concurrent with 
the President's submission to Congress of the President's request for 
appropriations for the Civil Works Program for a fiscal year, the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report describing the 
individual activities proposed for funding under subsection (a)(1) for 
that fiscal year.''.

SEC. 2026. LAKES PROGRAM.

    Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4148; 110 Stat. 3758; 113 Stat. 295) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at end of paragraph (18);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (19) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(20) Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois, removal of 
        silt and aquatic growth and measures to address excessive 
        sedimentation;
            ``(21) McCarter Pond, Borough of Fairhaven, New Jersey, 
        removal of silt and measures to address water quality;
            ``(22) Rogers Pond, Franklin Township, New Jersey, removal 
        of silt and restoration of structural integrity;
            ``(23) Greenwood Lake, New York and New Jersey, removal of 
        silt and aquatic growth;
            ``(24) Lake Rodgers, Creedmoor, North Carolina, removal of 
        silt and excessive nutrients and restoration of structural 
        integrity; and
            ``(25) Lake Luxembourg, Pennsylvania.''.

SEC. 2027. COORDINATION AND SCHEDULING OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL 
              ACTIONS.

    (a) Notice of Intent.--Upon request of the non-Federal interest in 
the form of a written notice of intent to construct or modify a non-
Federal water supply, wastewater infrastructure, flood damage 
reduction, storm damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, or navigation 
project that requires the approval of the Secretary, the Secretary 
shall initiate, subject to subsection (g)(1), procedures to establish a 
schedule for consolidating Federal, State, and local agency and Indian 
tribe environmental assessments, project reviews, and issuance of all 
permits for the construction or modification of the project. The non-
Federal interest shall submit to the Secretary, with the notice of 
intent, studies and documentation, including environmental reviews, 
that may be required by Federal law for decisionmaking on the proposed 
project. All States and Indian tribes having jurisdiction over the 
proposed project shall be invited by the Secretary, but shall not be 
required, to participate in carrying out this section with respect to 
the project.
    (b) Procedural Requirements.--Within 15 days after receipt of 
notice under subsection (a), the Secretary shall publish such notice in 
the Federal Register. The Secretary also shall provide written 
notification of the receipt of a notice under subsection (a) to all 
State and local agencies and Indian tribes that may be required to 
issue permits for the construction of the project or related 
activities. The Secretary shall solicit the cooperation of those 
agencies and request their entry into a memorandum of agreement 
described in subsection (c) with respect to the project. Within 30 days 
after publication of the notice in the Federal Register, State and 
local agencies and Indian tribes that intend to enter into the 
memorandum of agreement with respect to the project shall notify the 
Secretary of their intent in writing.
    (c) Scheduling Agreement.--Within 90 days after the date of receipt 
of notice under subsection (a) with respect to a project, the Secretary 
of the Interior, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Administrator of 
the Environmental Protection Agency, as necessary, and any State or 
local agencies that have notified the Secretary under subsection (b) 
shall enter into an agreement with the Secretary establishing a 
schedule of decisionmaking for approval of the project and permits 
associated with the project and with related activities.
    (d) Contents of Agreement.--An agreement entered into under 
subsection (c) with respect to a project, to the extent practicable, 
shall consolidate hearing and comment periods, procedures for data 
collection and report preparation, and the environmental review and 
permitting processes associated with the project and related 
activities. The agreement shall detail, to the extent possible, the 
non-Federal interest's responsibilities for data development and 
information that may be necessary to process each permit required for 
the project, including a schedule when the information and data will be 
provided to the appropriate Federal, State, or local agency or Indian 
tribe.
    (e) Revision of Agreement.--The Secretary may revise an agreement 
entered into under subsection (c) with respect to a project once to 
extend the schedule to allow the non-Federal interest the minimum 
amount of additional time necessary to revise its original application 
to meet the objections of a Federal, State, or local agency or Indian 
tribe that is a party to the agreement.
    (f) Final Decision.--Not later than the final day of a schedule 
established by an agreement entered into under subsection (c) with 
respect to a project, the Secretary shall notify the non-Federal 
interest of the final decision on the project and whether the permit or 
permits have been issued.
    (g) Costs of Coordination.--The costs incurred by the Secretary to 
establish and carry out a schedule to consolidate Federal, State, and 
local agency and Indian tribe environmental assessments, project 
reviews, and permit issuance for a project under this section shall be 
paid by the non-Federal interest.
    (h) Report on Timesavings Methods.--Not later than 3 years after 
the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall prepare and 
transmit to Congress a report estimating the time required for the 
issuance of all Federal, State, local, and tribal permits for the 
construction of non-Federal projects for water supply, wastewater 
infrastructure, flood damage reduction, storm damage reduction, 
ecosystem restoration, and navigation. The Secretary shall include in 
that report recommendations for further reducing the amount of time 
required for the issuance of those permits, including any proposed 
changes in existing law.

SEC. 2028. PROJECT STREAMLINING.

    (a) Policy.--The benefits of water resources projects are important 
to the Nation's economy and environment, and recommendations to 
Congress regarding such projects should not be delayed due to 
uncoordinated or inefficient reviews or the failure to timely resolve 
disputes during the development of water resources projects.
    (b) Scope.--This section shall apply to each study initiated after 
the date of enactment of this Act to develop a feasibility report under 
section 905 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2282), or a reevaluation report, for a water resources project if the 
Secretary determines that such study requires an environmental impact 
statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (c) Water Resources Project Review Process.--The Secretary shall 
develop and implement a coordinated review process for the development 
of water resources projects.
    (d) Coordinated Reviews.--
            (1) In general.--The coordinated review process under this 
        section shall provide that all reviews, analyses, opinions, 
        permits, licenses, and approvals that must be issued or made by 
        a Federal, State, or local government agency or Indian tribe 
        for the development of a water resources project described in 
        subsection (b) will be conducted, to the maximum extent 
        practicable, concurrently and completed within a time period 
        established by the Secretary, in cooperation with the agencies 
        identified under subsection (e) with respect to the project.
            (2) Agency participation.--Each Federal agency identified 
        under subsection (e) with respect to the development of a water 
        resources project shall formulate and implement administrative 
        policy and procedural mechanisms to enable the agency to ensure 
        completion of reviews, analyses, opinions, permits, licenses, 
        and approvals described in paragraph (1) for the project in a 
        timely and environmentally responsible manner.
    (e) Identification of Jurisdictional Agencies.--With respect to the 
development of each water resources project, the Secretary shall 
identify, as soon as practicable all Federal, State, and local 
government agencies and Indian tribes that may--
            (1) have jurisdiction over the project;
            (2) be required by law to conduct or issue a review, 
        analysis, or opinion for the project; or
            (3) be required to make a determination on issuing a 
        permit, license, or approval for the project.
    (f) State Authority.--If the coordinated review process is being 
implemented under this section by the Secretary with respect to the 
development of a water resources project described in subsection (b) 
within the boundaries of a State, the State, consistent with State law, 
may choose to participate in the process and to make subject to the 
process all State agencies that--
            (1) have jurisdiction over the project;
            (2) are required to conduct or issue a review, analysis, or 
        opinion for the project; or
            (3) are required to make a determination on issuing a 
        permit, license, or approval for the project.
    (g) Memorandum of Understanding.--The coordinated review process 
developed under this section may be incorporated into a memorandum of 
understanding for a water resources project between the Secretary, the 
heads of Federal, State, and local government agencies, Indian tribes 
identified under subsection (e), and the non-Federal interest for the 
project.
    (h) Effect of Failure to Meet Deadline.--
            (1) Notification of congress and ceq.--If the Secretary 
        determines that a Federal, State, or local government agency, 
        Indian tribe, or non-Federal interest that is participating in 
        the coordinated review process under this section with respect 
        to the development of a water resources project has not met a 
        deadline established under subsection (d) for the project, the 
        Secretary shall notify, within 30 days of the date of such 
        determination, the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the Committee 
        on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, the Council on 
        Environmental Quality, and the agency, Indian tribe, or non-
        Federal interest involved about the failure to meet the 
        deadline.
            (2) Agency report.--Not later than 30 days after the date 
        of receipt of a notice under paragraph (1), the Federal, State, 
        or local government agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal 
        interest involved may submit a report to the Secretary, the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives, the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
        of the Senate, and the Council on Environmental Quality 
        explaining why the agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal 
        interest did not meet the deadline and what actions it intends 
        to take to complete or issue the required review, analysis, or 
        opinion or determination on issuing a permit, license, or 
        approval.
    (i) Purpose and Need and Determination of Reasonable 
Alternatives.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, as the Federal lead agency 
        responsible for carrying out a study for a water resources 
        project and the associated process for meeting the requirements 
        of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, shall--
                    (A) define the project's purpose and need for 
                purposes of any document which the Secretary is 
                responsible for preparing for the project and shall 
                determine the range of alternatives for consideration 
                in any document which the Secretary is responsible for 
                preparing for the project; and
                    (B) determine, in collaboration with participating 
                agencies at appropriate times during the study process, 
                the methodologies to be used and the level of detail 
                required in the analysis of each alternative for the 
                project.
            (2) Preferred alternative.--At the discretion of the 
        Secretary, the preferred alternative for a project, after being 
        identified, may be developed to a higher level of detail than 
        other alternatives.
    (j) Limitations.--Nothing in this section shall preempt or 
interfere with--
            (1) any statutory requirement for seeking public comment;
            (2) any power, jurisdiction, or authority that a Federal, 
        State, or local government agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal 
        interest has with respect to carrying out a water resources 
        project; or
            (3) any obligation to comply with the provisions of the 
        National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the regulations 
        issued by the Council on Environmental Quality to carry out 
        such Act.

SEC. 2029. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--For the purpose of expediting the cost-effective 
design and construction of wetlands restoration that is part of an 
authorized water resources project, the Secretary may enter into 
cooperative agreements under section 6305 of title 31, United States 
Code, with nonprofit organizations with expertise in wetlands 
restoration to carry out such design and construction on behalf of the 
Secretary.
    (b) Limitations.--
            (1) Per project limit.--A cooperative agreement under this 
        section shall not obligate the Secretary to pay the nonprofit 
        organization more than $1,000,000 for any single wetlands 
        restoration project.
            (2) Annual limit.--The total value of work carried out 
        under cooperative agreements under this section may not exceed 
        $5,000,000 in any fiscal year.

SEC. 2030. TRAINING FUNDS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may include individuals not employed 
by the Department of the Army in training classes and courses offered 
by the Corps of Engineers in any case in which the Secretary determines 
that it is in the best interest of the Federal Government to include 
those individuals as participants.
    (b) Expenses.--
            (1) In general.--An individual not employed by the 
        Department of the Army attending a training class or course 
        described in subsection (a) shall pay the full cost of the 
        training provided to the individual.
            (2) Payments.--Payments made by an individual for training 
        received under paragraph (1), up to the actual cost of the 
        training--
                    (A) may be retained by the Secretary;
                    (B) shall be credited to an appropriations account 
                used for paying training costs; and
                    (C) shall be available for use by the Secretary, 
                without further appropriation, for training purposes.
            (3) Excess amounts.--Any payments received under paragraph 
        (2) that are in excess of the actual cost of training provided 
        shall be credited as miscellaneous receipts to the Treasury of 
        the United States.

SEC. 2031. ACCESS TO WATER RESOURCE DATA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a program to provide 
public access to water resources and related water quality data in the 
custody of the Corps of Engineers.
    (b) Data.--Public access under subsection (a) shall--
            (1) include, at a minimum, access to data generated in 
        water resources project development and regulation under 
        section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
        U.S.C. 1344); and
            (2) appropriately employ geographic information system 
        technology and linkages to water resource models and analytical 
        techniques.
    (c) Partnerships.--To the maximum extent practicable, in carrying 
out activities under this section, the Secretary shall develop 
partnerships, including cooperative agreements with State, tribal, and 
local governments and other Federal agencies.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for each fiscal year.

SEC. 2032. SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--In accordance with the Act of July 3, 1930 (33 
U.S.C. 426), and notwithstanding administrative actions, it is the 
policy of the United States to promote beach nourishment for the 
purposes of flood damage reduction and hurricane and storm damage 
reduction and related research that encourage the protection, 
restoration, and enhancement of sandy beaches, including beach 
restoration and periodic beach renourishment for a period of 50 years, 
on a comprehensive and coordinated basis by the Federal Government, 
States, localities, and private enterprises.
    (b) Preference.--In carrying out the policy under subsection (a), 
preference shall be given to--
            (1) areas in which there has been a Federal investment of 
        funds for the purposes described in subsection (a); and
            (2) areas with respect to which the need for prevention or 
        mitigation of damage to shores and beaches is attributable to 
        Federal navigation projects or other Federal activities.
    (c) Applicability.--The Secretary shall apply the policy under 
subsection (a) to each shore protection and beach renourishment project 
(including shore protection and beach renourishment projects 
constructed before the date of enactment of this Act).

SEC. 2033. ABILITY TO PAY.

    (a) Criteria and Procedures.--Section 103(m)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)(2)) is amended by 
striking ``180 days after such date of enactment'' and inserting 
``September 30, 2007''.
    (b) Projects.--The Secretary shall apply the criteria and 
procedures referred to in section 103(m) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)) to the following projects:
            (1) St. johns bayou and new madrid floodway, missouri.--The 
        project for flood control, St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid 
        Floodway, Missouri, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4118).
            (2) Lower rio grande basin, texas.--The project for flood 
        control, Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas, authorized by section 
        401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
        Stat. 4125).
            (3) West virginia and pennsylvania projects.--The projects 
        for flood control authorized by section 581 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3790-3791).

SEC. 2034. LEASING AUTHORITY.

    Section 4 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction 
of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and 
other purposes'', approved December 22, 1944 (16 U.S.C. 460d), is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``federally recognized Indian tribes and'' 
        before ``Federal'' the first place it appears;
            (2) by inserting ``Indian tribes or'' after 
        ``considerations, to such''; and
            (3) by inserting ``federally recognized Indian tribe'' 
        after ``That in any such lease or license to a''.

SEC. 2035. COST ESTIMATES.

    The estimated Federal and non-Federal costs of projects authorized 
to be carried out by the Secretary before, on, or after the date of 
enactment of this Act are for informational purposes only and shall not 
be interpreted as affecting the cost sharing responsibilities 
established by law.

SEC. 2036. PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall issue revised principles and 
guidelines for use in the formulation, evaluation, and implementation 
of water resources projects. Subject to the requirements of this 
section, the revised principles and guidelines shall apply to water 
resources projects carried out by the Secretary instead of the 
principles and guidelines for such projects in effect on the date of 
enactment of this Act.
    (b) Content.--The principles and guidelines shall, among other 
things--
            (1) provide for the consideration of environmental 
        restoration costs and benefits under Corps of Engineers 
        economic models;
            (2) incorporate new techniques in risk and uncertainty 
        analysis;
            (3) eliminate biases and disincentives for nonstructural 
        flood damage reduction projects as compared to structural flood 
        damage reduction projects;
            (4) incorporate new analytical techniques;
            (5) encourage, to the maximum extent practicable, the 
        restoration of aquatic ecosystems; and
            (6) ensure that water resources projects are justified by 
        benefits that accrue to the public at large.
    (c) Proposed Principles and Guidelines.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 270 days after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall publish in the 
        Federal Register proposed principles and guidelines under 
        subsection (a).
            (2) Consultation.--In developing the proposed principles 
        and guidelines, the Secretary shall consult with the Secretary 
        of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of 
        Commerce, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the 
        Secretary of Transportation, the Administrator of the 
        Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of Energy, the 
        Secretary of Homeland Security, the National Academy of 
        Sciences, and the Council on Environmental Quality.
            (3) Public participation.--The Secretary shall provide 
        notice and an opportunity for the public to participate in the 
        development of the proposed principles and guidelines.
    (d) Public Comment Following Issuance of Proposed Principles and 
Guidelines.--After publication of the proposed principles and 
guidelines, the Secretary shall provide an opportunity for the public 
to comment on the proposed principles and guidelines. The comment 
period shall not be fewer than 60 days.
    (e) Final Principles and Guidelines.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days following the last 
        day of the comment period under subsection (d), the Secretary 
        shall issue final principles and guidelines under subsection 
        (a).
            (2) Applicability.--After the date of issuance of the final 
        principles and guidelines, the final principles and guidelines 
        shall apply--
                    (A) to all water resources projects carried out by 
                the Secretary, other than projects for which the 
                Secretary has commenced a feasibility report before the 
                date of such issuance;
                    (B) at the request of a non-Federal interest, to a 
                water resources project for which the Secretary has 
                commenced a feasibility report before the date of such 
                issuance; and
                    (C) to reevaluation or modification of a water 
                resources project, other than a reevaluation or 
                modification that has been commenced by the Secretary 
                before the date of such issuance.
    (f) Existing Studies.--Principles and guidelines issued under 
subsection (a) shall not affect the validity of any completed study of 
a water resources development project.

SEC. 2037. INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW.

    (a) Project Studies Subject to Independent Peer Review.--
            (1) In general.--Project studies shall be subject to a peer 
        review by an independent panel of experts as determined under 
        this section.
            (2) Scope.--The peer review may include a review of the 
        economic and environmental assumptions and projections, project 
        evaluation data, economic analyses, environmental analyses, 
        engineering analyses, formulation of alternative plans, methods 
        for integrating risk and uncertainty, models used in evaluation 
        of economic or environmental impacts of proposed projects, and 
        any biological opinions of the project study.
            (3) Project studies subject to peer review.--
                    (A) Mandatory.--A project study shall be subject to 
                peer review under paragraph (1)--
                            (i) if the project has an estimated total 
                        cost of more than $50,000,000, including 
                        mitigation costs, and is not determined by the 
                        Chief of Engineers to be exempt from peer 
                        review under paragraph (6); or
                            (ii) the Governor of an affected State 
                        requests a peer review by an independent panel 
                        of experts.
                    (B) Discretionary.--A project study may be subject 
                to peer review if--
                            (i) the head of a Federal or State agency 
                        charged with reviewing the project study 
                        determines that the project is likely to have a 
                        significant adverse impact on environmental, 
                        cultural, or other resources under the 
                        jurisdiction of the agency after implementation 
                        of proposed mitigation plans and requests a 
                        peer review by an independent panel of experts; 
                        or
                            (ii) the Chief of Engineers determines that 
                        the project study is controversial.
            (4) Controversial projects.--Upon receipt of a written 
        request under paragraph (3)(B) or on the initiative of the 
        Chief of Engineers, the Chief of Engineers shall determine 
        whether a project study is controversial.
            (5) Factors to consider.--In determining whether a project 
        study is controversial, the Chief of Engineers shall consider 
        if--
                    (A) there is a significant public dispute as to the 
                size, nature, or effects of the project; or
                    (B) there is a significant public dispute as to the 
                economic or environmental costs or benefits of the 
                project.
            (6) Project studies excluded from peer review.--Project 
        studies that may be excluded from peer review under paragraph 
        (1) are--
                    (A) a study for a project the Chief of Engineers 
                determines--
                            (i) is not controversial;
                            (ii) has no more than negligible adverse 
                        impacts on scarce or unique cultural, historic, 
                        or tribal resources;
                            (iii) has no substantial adverse impacts on 
                        fish and wildlife species and their habitat 
                        prior to the implementation of mitigation 
                        measures; and
                            (iv) has, before implementation of 
                        mitigation measures, no more than a negligible 
                        adverse impact on a species listed as 
                        endangered or threatened species under the 
                        Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1539 
                        et seq.) or the critical habitat of such 
                        species designated under such Act; and
                    (B) a study for a project pursued under section 205 
                of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), 
                section 2 of the Flood Control Act of August 28, 1937 
                (33 U.S.C. 701g), section 14 of the Flood Control Act 
                of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), section 107(a) of the River 
                and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577(a)), section 3 of 
                the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal 
                participation in the cost of protecting the shores of 
                publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 
                U.S.C. 426g), section 111 of the River and Harbor Act 
                of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i), section 3 of the Act entitled 
                ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and 
                preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
                harbors, and for other purposes'', approved March 2, 
                1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a), section 1135 of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), 
                section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), or section 204 of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326).
            (7) Appeal.--The decision of the Chief of Engineers whether 
        to peer review a project study shall be published in the 
        Federal Register and shall be subject to appeal by a person 
        referred to in paragraph (3)(B)(i) or (3)(B)(ii) to the 
        Secretary of the Army if such appeal is made within the 30-day 
        period following the date of such publication.
            (8) Determination of project cost.--For purposes of 
        determining the estimated total cost of a project under 
        paragraph (3)(A), the project cost shall be based upon the 
        reasonable estimates of the Chief of Engineers at the 
        completion of the reconnaissance study for the project. If the 
        reasonable estimate of project costs is subsequently determined 
        to be in excess of the amount in paragraph (3)(A), the Chief of 
        Engineers shall make a determination whether a project study 
        should be reviewed under this section.
    (b) Timing of Peer Review.--The Chief of Engineers shall determine 
the timing of a peer review of a project study under subsection (a). In 
all cases, the peer review shall occur during the period beginning on 
the date of the completion of the reconnaissance study for the project 
and ending on the date the draft report of the Chief of Engineers for 
the project is made available for public comment. Where the Chief of 
Engineers has not initiated a peer review of a project study, the Chief 
of Engineers shall consider, at a minimum, whether to initiate a peer 
review at the time that--
            (1) the without-project conditions are identified;
            (2) the array of alternatives to be considered are 
        identified; and
            (3) the preferred alternative is identified.
Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to require the Chief of 
Engineers to conduct multiple peer reviews for a project study.
    (c) Establishment of Panels.--
            (1) In general.--For each project study subject to peer 
        review under subsection (a), as soon as practicable after the 
        Chief of Engineers determines that a project study will be 
        subject to peer review, the Chief of Engineers shall contract 
        with the National Academy of Sciences (or a similar independent 
        scientific and technical advisory organization), or an eligible 
        organization, to establish a panel of experts to peer review 
        the project study for technical and scientific sufficiency.
            (2) Membership.--A panel of experts established for a 
        project study under this section shall be composed of 
        independent experts who represent a balance of areas of 
        expertise suitable for the review being conducted.
            (3) Limitation on appointments.--An individual may not be 
        selected to serve on a panel of experts established for a 
        project study under this section if the individual has a 
        financial or close professional association with any 
        organization or group with a strong financial or organizational 
        interest in the project.
            (4) Congressional notification.--Upon identification of a 
        project study for peer review under this section, but prior to 
        initiation of any review, the Chief of Engineers shall notify 
        the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
        the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
        of Representatives of such review.
    (d) Duties of Panels.--A panel of experts established for a peer 
review for a project study under this section shall, consistent with 
the scope of the referral for review--
            (1) conduct a peer review for the project study submitted 
        to the panel for review;
            (2) assess the adequacy and acceptability of the economic 
        and environmental methods, models, and analyses used by the 
        Chief of Engineers;
            (3) provide timely written and oral comments to the Chief 
        of Engineers throughout the development of the project study, 
        as requested; and
            (4) submit to the Chief of Engineers a final report 
        containing the panel's economic, engineering, and environmental 
        analysis of the project study, including the panel's assessment 
        of the adequacy and acceptability of the economic and 
        environmental methods, models, and analyses used by the Chief 
        of Engineers, to accompany the publication of the project 
        study.
    (e) Duration of Project Study Peer Reviews.--
            (1) Deadline.--A panel of experts shall--
                    (A) complete its peer review under this section for 
                a project study and submit a report to the Chief of 
                Engineers under subsection (d)(4) within 180 days after 
                the date of establishment of the panel, or, if the 
                Chief of Engineers determines that a longer period of 
                time is necessary, such period of time established by 
                the Chief of Engineers, but in no event later than 90 
                days after the date a draft project study is made 
                available for public review; and
                    (B) terminate on the date of submission of the 
                report.
            (2) Failure to meet deadline.--If a panel does not complete 
        its peer review of a project study under this section and 
        submit a report to the Chief of Engineers under subsection 
        (d)(4) on or before the deadline established by paragraph (1) 
        for the project study, the Chief of Engineers shall continue 
        the project study for the project that is subject to peer 
        review by the panel without delay.
    (f) Recommendations of Panel.--
            (1) Consideration by the chief of engineers.--After 
        receiving a report on a project study from a panel of experts 
        under this section and before entering a final record of 
        decision for the project, the Chief of Engineers shall consider 
        any recommendations contained in the report and prepare a 
        written response for any recommendations adopted or not 
        adopted.
            (2) Public availability and transmittal to congress.--After 
        receiving a report on a project study from a panel of experts 
        under this section, the Chief of Engineers shall--
                    (A) make a copy of the report and any written 
                response of the Chief of Engineers on recommendations 
                contained in the report available to the public; and
                    (B) transmit to Congress a copy of the report, 
                together with any such written response, on the date of 
                a final report of the Chief of Engineers or other final 
                decision document for a project study that is subject 
                to peer review by the panel.
    (g) Costs.--
            (1) In general.--The costs of a panel of experts 
        established for a peer review under this section--
                    (A) shall be a Federal expense; and
                    (B) shall not exceed $500,000.
            (2) Waiver.--The Chief of Engineers may waive the $500,000 
        limitation contained in paragraph (1)(B) in cases that the 
        Chief of Engineers determines appropriate.
    (h) Applicability.--This section shall apply to--
            (1) project studies initiated during the 2-year period 
        preceding the date of enactment of this Act and for which the 
        array of alternatives to be considered has not been identified; 
        and
            (2) project studies initiated during the period beginning 
        on such date of enactment and ending 4 years after such date of 
        enactment.
    (i) Report.--Within 4\1/2\ years of the date of enactment of this 
section, the Chief of Engineers shall submit a report to Congress on 
the implementation of this section.
    (j) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to any peer review panel established 
under this section.
    (k) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
affect any authority of the Chief of Engineers to cause or conduct a 
peer review of a water resources project existing on the date of 
enactment of this section.
    (l) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Project study.--The term ``project study'' means a 
        feasibility study or reevaluation study for a project. The term 
        also includes any other study associated with a modification or 
        update of a project that includes an environmental impact 
        statement, including the environmental impact statement.
            (2) Affected state.--The term ``affected State'', as used 
        with respect to a project, means a State all or a portion of 
        which is within the drainage basin in which the project is or 
        would be located and would be economically or environmentally 
        affected as a consequence of the project.
            (3) Eligible organization.--The term ``eligible 
        organization'' means an organization that--
                    (A) is described in section 501(c)(3), and exempt 
                from Federal tax under section 501(a), of the Internal 
                Revenue Code of 1986;
                    (B) is independent;
                    (C) is free from conflicts of interest;
                    (D) does not carry out or advocate for or against 
                Federal water resources projects; and
                    (E) has experience in establishing and 
                administering peer review panels.

SEC. 2038. STUDIES AND REPORTS FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS.

    (a) Studies.--
            (1) Cost-sharing requirements.--Section 105(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215(a)) is 
        amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Detailed project reports.--The requirements of this 
        subsection that apply to a feasibility study also shall apply 
        to a study that results in a detailed project report, except 
        that--
                    ``(A) the first $100,000 of the costs of a study 
                that results in a detailed project report shall be a 
                Federal expense; and
                    ``(B) paragraph (1)(C)(ii) shall not apply to such 
                a study.''.
            (2) Planning and engineering.--Section 105(b) of such Act 
        (33 U.S.C. 2215(b)) is amended by striking ``authorized by this 
        Act''.
            (3) Definitions.--Section 105 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 2215) 
        is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions 
apply:
            ``(1) Detailed project report.--The term `detailed project 
        report' means a report for a project not specifically 
        authorized by Congress in law or otherwise that determines the 
        feasibility of the project with a level of detail appropriate 
        to the scope and complexity of the recommended solution and 
        sufficient to proceed directly to the preparation of contract 
        plans and specifications. The term includes any associated 
        environmental impact statement and mitigation plan. For a 
        project for which the Federal cost does not exceed $1,000,000, 
        the term includes a planning and design analysis document.
            ``(2) Feasibility study.--The term `feasibility study' 
        means a study that results in a feasibility report under 
        section 905, and any associated environmental impact statement 
        and mitigation plan, prepared by the Corps of Engineers for a 
        water resources project. The term includes a study that results 
        in a project implementation report prepared under title VI of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680-
        2694), a general reevaluation report, and a limited 
        reevaluation report.''.
    (b) Reports.--
            (1) Preparation.--Section 905(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282(a)) is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``(a) In the case of any'' and 
                inserting the following:
    ``(a) Preparation of Reports.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of any'';
                    (B) by striking ``the Secretary, the Secretary 
                shall'' and inserting ``the Secretary that results in 
                recommendations concerning a project or the operation 
                of a project and that requires specific authorization 
                by Congress in law or otherwise, the Secretary shall 
                perform a reconnaissance study and'';
                    (C) by striking ``Such feasibility report'' and 
                inserting the following:
            ``(2) Contents of feasibility reports.--A feasibility 
        report'';
                    (D) by striking ``The feasibility report'' and 
                inserting ``A feasibility report''; and
                    (E) by striking the last sentence and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(3) Applicability.--This subsection shall not apply to--
                    ``(A) any study with respect to which a report has 
                been submitted to Congress before the date of enactment 
                of this Act;
                    ``(B) any study for a project, which project is 
                authorized for construction by this Act and is not 
                subject to section 903(b);
                    ``(C) any study for a project which does not 
                require specific authorization by Congress in law or 
                otherwise; and
                    ``(D) general studies not intended to lead to 
                recommendation of a specific water resources project.
            ``(4) Feasibility report defined.--In this subsection, the 
        term `feasibility report' means each feasibility report, and 
        any associated environmental impact statement and mitigation 
        plan, prepared by the Corps of Engineers for a water resources 
        project. The term includes a project implementation report 
        prepared under title VI of the Water Resources Development Act 
        of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680-2694), a general reevaluation report, 
        and a limited reevaluation report.''.
            (2) Projects not specifically authorized by congress.--
        Section 905 of such Act is further amended--
                    (A) in subsection (b) by inserting ``Reconnaissance 
                Studies.--'' before ``Before initiating'';
                    (B) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) 
                as subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively;
                    (C) by inserting after subsection (b) the 
                following:
    ``(c) Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress.--In the 
case of any water resources project-related study authorized to be 
undertaken by the Secretary without specific authorization by Congress 
in law or otherwise, the Secretary shall prepare a detailed project 
report.'';
                    (D) in subsection (d) (as so redesignated) by 
                inserting ``Indian Tribes.--'' before ``For purposes 
                of''; and
                    (E) in subsection (e) (as so redesignated) by 
                inserting ``Standard and Uniform Procedures and 
                Practices.--'' before ``The Secretary shall''.

SEC. 2039. OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS FABRICATION PORT.

    (a) In General.--In conducting a feasibility study for the project 
for navigation, Atchafalaya River, Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, 
Louisiana, being conducted under section 430 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2639), and for the project for 
navigation, Houma Navigation Canal, Louisiana, being conducted pursuant 
to the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1995 (Public 
Law 103-316), the Secretary shall include in the calculation of 
national economic development benefits all economic benefits associated 
with contracts for new energy exploration and contracts for the 
fabrication of energy infrastructure that would result from carrying 
out the project.
    (b) Repeal.--Section 6009 of the Emergency Supplemental 
Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami 
Relief, 2005 (Public Law 109-13; 119 Stat. 282) is repealed.

SEC. 2040. USE OF FIRMS EMPLOYING LOCAL RESIDENTS.

    (a) Contracts or Agreements With Private Entities.--In carrying out 
construction of a water resources project, the Secretary may enter into 
a contract or agreement with a private entity only if the private 
entity provides assurances satisfactory to the Secretary that, to the 
maximum extent practicable--
            (1) local residents in the area of the project will 
        comprise not less than 50 percent of the workforce employed by 
        the entity to perform the contract or agreement; and
            (2) local residents in the area of the project will 
        comprise not less than 50 percent of the workforce employed by 
        each subcontractor at each tier in connection with the contract 
        or agreement.
    (b) Exemptions.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may waive the application of 
        subsection (a) with respect to a contract or agreement if the 
        Secretary determines that compliance with subsection (a) is not 
        feasible due to--
                    (A) a lack of qualified local residents to permit 
                satisfaction of the requirements of subsection (a);
                    (B) a lack of sufficient numbers of specialized 
                workers necessary to carry out the project; or
                    (C) the need to comply with small business or 
                minority contracting requirements under Federal law.
            (2) Documentation.--Any determination by the Secretary 
        under paragraph (1) to waive the application of subsection (a) 
        with respect to a contract or agreement shall be justified in 
        writing.
    (c) Regulations.--The Secretary shall issue regulations 
establishing local residency and other requirements to facilitate 
compliance with this section.
    (d) Prior Contracts.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
affect any contract or agreement entered into before the effective date 
of this section.
    (e) Effective Date.--This section shall become effective 180 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2041. SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 2361 of title 10, United 
States Code, the Secretary is authorized to provide assistance through 
contracts, cooperative agreements, and grants to--
            (1) the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, for 
        establishment and operation of the Southeastern Water Resources 
        Institute to study sustainable development and utilization of 
        water resources in the southeastern United States;
            (2) Lewis and Clark Community College, Illinois, for the 
        Great Rivers National Research and Education Center (including 
        facilities that have been or will be constructed at one or more 
        locations in the vicinity of the confluence of the Illinois 
        River, the Missouri River, and the Mississippi River), a 
        collaborative effort of Lewis and Clark Community College, the 
        University of Illinois, the Illinois Department of Natural 
        Resources and Environmental Sciences, and other entities, for 
        the study of river ecology, developing watershed and river 
        management strategies, and educating students and the public on 
        river issues; and
            (3) the University of Texas at Dallas for support and 
        operation of the International Center for Decision and Risk 
        Analysis to study risk analysis and control methods for 
        transboundary water resources management in the southwestern 
        United States and other international water resources 
        management problems.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out subsection (a)(1) 
$5,000,000, to carry out subsection (a)(2) $5,000,000, and to carry out 
subsection (a)(3) $5,000,000. Such sums shall remain available until 
expended.

SEC. 2042. FEDERAL HOPPER DREDGES.

    Section 3(c) of the Act of August 11, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 622; 25 Stat. 
423), is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (7)(B) by adding at the end the following: 
        ``This subparagraph shall not apply to the Federal hopper 
        dredges Essayons and Yaquina of the Corps of Engineers.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) Ready reserve for the hopper dredge mcfarland.--The 
        Secretary shall place the Federal hopper dredge McFarland of 
        the Corps of Engineers in ready reserve status not later than 
        October 1, 2008.''.

SEC. 2043. CRITERIA FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF HARBOR DREDGING 
              PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall budget and request appropriations for operation 
and maintenance of harbor dredging projects based only upon criteria 
used for such projects in fiscal year 2004 and shall not use a budget 
standard for such projects based on the amount of tonnage a harbor 
handles.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 3001. COOK INLET, ALASKA.

    Section 118(a)(3) of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 2005 (title I of division C of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2005; 118 Stat. 2945) is amended by inserting ``as 
part of the operation and maintenance of such project modification'' 
after ``by the Secretary''.

SEC. 3002. KING COVE HARBOR, ALASKA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for navigation, King Cove Harbor, Alaska, being carried out 
under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
shall be $8,000,000.

SEC. 3003. SITKA, ALASKA.

    The Sitka, Alaska, element of the project for navigation, Southeast 
Alaska Harbors of Refuge, Alaska, authorized by section 101(1) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4801), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to take such action as is necessary to correct 
design deficiencies in the Sitka Harbor Breakwater, at full Federal 
expense. The estimated cost is $6,300,000.

SEC. 3004. TATITLEK, ALASKA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for navigation, Tatitlek, Alaska, being carried out under 
section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), shall 
be $10,000,000.

SEC. 3005. RIO DE FLAG, FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Rio De Flag, Flagstaff, 
Arizona, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2576), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of $54,100,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $35,000,000 and a non-Federal cost of 
$19,100,000.

SEC. 3006. OSCEOLA HARBOR, ARKANSAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Osceola Harbor, 
Arkansas, constructed under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to allow non-Federal interests to 
construct a mooring facility within the existing authorized harbor 
channel, subject to all necessary permits, certifications, and other 
requirements.
    (b) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section 
shall be construed as affecting the responsibility of the Secretary to 
maintain the general navigation features of the project at a bottom 
width of 250 feet.

SEC. 3007. PINE MOUNTAIN DAM, ARKANSAS.

    The Pine Mountain Dam feature of the project for flood protection, 
Lee Creek, Arkansas and Oklahoma, authorized by section 204 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1078), is modified--
            (1) to add environmental restoration as a project purpose; 
        and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to finance the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project over a 30-year period in 
        accordance with section 103(k) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(k)).

SEC. 3008. AMERICAN AND SACRAMENTO RIVERS, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, American and 
Sacramento Rivers, California, authorized by section 101(a)(6)(A) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 274), as 
modified by section 128 of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2259), is further modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the auxiliary spillway generally 
in accordance with the Post Authorization Change Report, American River 
Watershed Project (Folsom Dam Modification and Folsom Dam Raise 
Projects), dated December 2006, at a total cost of $683,000,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $444,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $239,000,000.
    (b) Dam Safety Activities.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to limit the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to 
carry out dam safety activities in connection with the auxiliary 
spillway in accordance with the Bureau of Reclamation Safety of Dams 
Program.
    (c) Transfer of Funds.--The Secretary and the Secretary of the 
Interior are authorized to transfer between their respective agencies 
appropriated amounts and other available funds (including funds 
contributed by non-Federal interests) for the purpose of planning, 
design, and construction of the auxiliary spillway. Any transfer made 
pursuant to this subsection shall be subject to such terms and 
conditions as agreed upon by the Secretary and the Secretary of the 
Interior.

SEC. 3009. COMPTON CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Los Angeles Drainage Area, 
California, authorized by section 101(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4611), is modified to add 
environmental restoration and recreation as project purposes.

SEC. 3010. GRAYSON CREEK/MURDERER'S CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Grayson Creek/
Murderer's Creek, California, being carried out under section 206 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is 
modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work 
        carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
        determines that the work is integral to the project; and
            (2) to authorize the Secretary to consider national 
        ecosystem restoration benefits in determining the Federal 
        interest in the project.

SEC. 3011. HAMILTON AIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for environmental restoration, Hamilton Airfield, 
California, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to construct the project substantially in accordance with the 
report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 19, 2004, at a total cost 
of $228,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $171,100,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $57,000,000.

SEC. 3012. JOHN F. BALDWIN SHIP CHANNEL AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNEL, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, San Francisco to Stockton, California, 
authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
1091) is modified--
            (1) to provide that the non-Federal share of the cost of 
        the John F. Baldwin Ship Channel and Stockton Ship Channel 
        element of the project may be provided in the form of in-kind 
        services and materials; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of such element the cost of planning 
        and design work carried out by the non-Federal interest before 
        the date of an agreement for such planning and design if the 
        Secretary determines that such work is integral to such 
        element.

SEC. 3013. KAWEAH RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, 
California, authorized by section 101(b)(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3658), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project, or provide reimbursement not to exceed $800,000, for the costs 
of any work carried out by the non-Federal interest before, on, or 
after the date of the project partnership agreement if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3014. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, 
California, authorized by section 601(d) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to determine whether maintenance of the project is feasible, 
and if the Secretary determines that maintenance of the project is 
feasible, to carry out such maintenance.

SEC. 3015. LLAGAS CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, Llagas 
Creek, California, authorized by section 501(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 333), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to carry out the project at a total cost of $105,000,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $65,000,000, and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $40,000,000.
    (b) Special Rule.--In evaluating and implementing the project, the 
Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that 
the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
necessary to implement the project.

SEC. 3016. MAGPIE CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for Magpie Creek, California, 
authorized under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 
U.S.C. 701s), is modified to direct the Secretary to apply the cost-
sharing requirements of section 103(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4085) for the portion of the project 
consisting of land acquisition to preserve and enhance existing 
floodwater storage.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the cost of planning and design work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that 
the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3017. PACIFIC FLYWAY CENTER, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Pacific Flyway 
Center, Sacramento, California, being carried out under section 206 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to expend $2,000,000 to enhance 
public access to the project.

SEC. 3018. PINOLE CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for improvement of the quality of the environment, 
Pinole Creek Phase I, California, being carried out under section 1135 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.

SEC. 3019. PRADO DAM, CALIFORNIA.

    Upon completion of the modifications to the Prado Dam element of 
the project for flood control, Santa Ana River Mainstem, California, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4113), the Memorandum of Agreement for the Operation 
for Prado Dam for Seasonal Additional Water Conservation between the 
Department of the Army and the Orange County Water District (including 
all the conditions and stipulations in the memorandum) shall remain in 
effect for volumes of water made available prior to such modifications.

SEC. 3020. SACRAMENTO AND AMERICAN RIVERS FLOOD CONTROL, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide credit to the 
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, in the amount of $20,503,000, for 
the non-reimbursed Federal share of costs incurred by the Agency in 
connection the project for flood control and recreation, Sacramento and 
American Rivers, California (Natomas Levee features), authorized by 
section 9159 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (106 
Stat. 1944).
    (b) Allocation of Credit.--The Secretary shall allocate the amount 
to be credited under subsection (a) toward the non-Federal share of 
such projects as are requested by the Sacramento Area Flood Control 
Agency.

SEC. 3021. SACRAMENTO DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, 
California, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of planning and design work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.

SEC. 3022. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, Santa Cruz Harbor, California, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 
300) and modified by section 809 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (100 Stat. 4168) and section 526 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 346), is modified to direct the 
Secretary--
            (1) to renegotiate the memorandum of agreement with the 
        non-Federal interest to increase the annual payment to reflect 
        the updated cost of operation and maintenance that is the 
        Federal and non-Federal share as provided by law based on the 
        project purpose; and
            (2) to revise the memorandum of agreement to include terms 
        that revise such payments for inflation.

SEC. 3023. SEVEN OAKS DAM, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Santa Ana Mainstem, authorized by 
section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4113) and modified by section 104 of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 1988 (101 Stat. 1329-11), section 
102(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4611), 
and section 311 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3713), is further modified to direct the Secretary to conduct a 
study of water conservation and water quality at the Seven Oaks Dam, 
California, for water conservation.

SEC. 3024. UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Upper 
Guadalupe River, California, authorized by section 101(a)(9) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 275), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project generally in 
accordance with the Upper Guadalupe River Flood Damage Reduction, San 
Jose, California, Limited Reevaluation Report, dated March, 2004, at a 
total cost of $244,500,000.

SEC. 3025. WALNUT CREEK CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Walnut Creek 
Channel, California, being carried out under section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work 
        carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
        determines that the work is integral to the project; and
            (2) to authorize the Secretary to consider national 
        ecosystem restoration benefits in determining the Federal 
        interest in the project.

SEC. 3026. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE I, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for improvement of the quality of the environment, 
Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase I, California, being carried out under 
section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2309a), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project.

SEC. 3027. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE II, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Wildcat/San Pablo 
Creek Phase II, California, being carried out under section 206 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project 
if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project 
and to authorize the Secretary to consider national ecosystem 
restoration benefits in determining the Federal interest in the 
project.

SEC. 3028. YUBA RIVER BASIN PROJECT, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Yuba River Basin, 
California, authorized by section 101(a)(10) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 275), is modified--
            (1) to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at 
        a total cost of $107,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $70,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $37,700,000; 
        and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work 
        carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
        determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3029. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, COLORADO.

    Section 808 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4168) is amended by striking ``agriculture,'' and inserting 
``agriculture, environmental restoration,''.

SEC. 3030. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, 
              DELAWARE AND MARYLAND.

    The project for navigation, Intracoastal Waterway, Delaware River 
to Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by the first 
section of the Rivers and Harbors Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 
1030), and section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 
1249), is modified to add recreation as a project purpose.

SEC. 3031. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    (a) Shoreline.--The project for shoreline protection, Brevard 
County, Florida, authorized by section 101(b)(7) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to establish the reach of the 
        project as the reach between the Florida department of 
        environmental protection monuments 75.4 to 118.3, a distance of 
        7.6 miles; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to expedite the general 
        reevaluation report required by section 418 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2637).
    (b) Credit.--Section 310 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 301) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Credit.--After completion of the study, the Secretary shall 
credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for 
shore protection the cost of nourishment and renourishment associated 
with the project for shore protection incurred by the non-Federal 
interest to respond to damages to Brevard County beaches that are the 
result of a Federal navigation project, as determined in the final 
report for the study.''.

SEC. 3032. BROWARD COUNTY AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLORIDA.

    The project for shore protection, Broward County and Hillsboro 
Inlet, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1965 (79 Stat. 1090), and modified by section 311 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 301), is further modified 
to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project the cost of mitigation construction and derelict 
erosion control structure removal carried out by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project 
if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3033. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLORIDA.

    In carrying out the project for navigation, Canaveral Harbor, 
Florida, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 
(76 Stat. 1174), the Secretary shall construct a sediment trap.

SEC. 3034. GASPARILLA AND ESTERO ISLANDS, FLORIDA.

    The project for shore protection, Gasparilla and Estero Island 
segments, Lee County, Florida, authorized by section 201 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1073), by Senate Resolution dated 
December 17, 1970, and by House Resolution dated December 15, 1970, and 
modified by section 309 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2602), is further modified to direct the Secretary to credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that 
the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3035. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Jacksonville Harbor, 
Florida, authorized by section 101(a)(17) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to extend the navigation features in accordance with the 
Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 22, 2003, at a total cost 
of $14,658,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,636,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $5,022,000.
    (b) General Reevaluation Reports.--The non-Federal share of the 
cost of the general reevaluation report that resulted in the report of 
the Chief of Engineers for the project and the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the general reevaluation report for Jacksonville Harbor, 
Florida, being conducted on June 1, 2005, shall each be the same 
percentage as the non-Federal share of the cost of construction of the 
project.
    (c) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into new partnership 
agreements with the non-Federal interest to reflect the cost sharing 
required by subsection (b).

SEC. 3036. LIDO KEY BEACH, SARASOTA, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--The project for shore protection, Lido Key Beach, 
Sarasota, Florida, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1819), deauthorized under section 1001(b) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), and 
reauthorized by section 364(2)(A) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 313), is modified to direct the Secretary to 
construct the project substantially in accordance with the report of 
the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost of 
$15,190,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,320,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $5,870,000, and at an estimated total 
cost of $65,000,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of 
the project.
    (b) Construction of Shoreline Protection Projects by Non-Federal 
Interests.--The Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement with 
the non-Federal interest in accordance with section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 426i-1) for the modified 
project.

SEC. 3037. MIAMI HARBOR, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel, Florida, 
authorized by section 101(a)(9) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606) and modified by section 315 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 302), is further 
modified--
            (1) to include as a project purpose environmental 
        mitigation required before July 18, 2003, by a Federal, State, 
        or local environmental agency for unauthorized or unanticipated 
        environmental impacts within, or in the vicinity of, the 
        authorized project; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to reimburse the non-Federal 
        interest for the Federal share of the costs the non-Federal 
        interest has incurred in construction of the project (including 
        environmental mitigation costs and costs incurred for 
        incomplete usable increments of the project) in accordance with 
        section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
        U.S.C. 2232).

SEC. 3038. PEANUT ISLAND, FLORIDA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for improvement of the quality of the environment, Peanut 
Island, Palm Beach County, Florida, being carried out under section 
1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) 
shall be $9,750,000.

SEC. 3039. TAMPA HARBOR-BIG BEND CHANNEL, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida, 
authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 276) is modified to direct the Secretary to credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
planning, design, and construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project 
if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3040. TAMPA HARBOR CUT B, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor, Florida, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 
1818), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct passing 
lanes in an area approximately 3.5 miles long and centered on Tampa 
Harbor Cut B if the Secretary determines that such improvements are 
necessary for navigation safety.
    (b) General Reevaulation Report.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
of the general reevaluation report for Tampa Harbor, Florida, being 
conducted on June 1, 2005, shall be the same percentage as the non-
Federal share of the cost of construction of the project.
    (c) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into a new partnership 
agreement with the non-Federal interest to reflect the cost sharing 
required by subsection (b).

SEC. 3041. ALLATOONA LAKE, GEORGIA.

    (a) Land Exchange.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may exchange lands above 863 
        feet in elevation at Allatoona Lake, Georgia, identified in the 
        Real Estate Design Memorandum prepared by the Mobile district 
        engineer, April 5, 1996, and approved October 8, 1996, for 
        lands on the north side of Allatoona Lake that are needed for 
        wildlife management and for protection of the water quality and 
        overall environment of Allatoona Lake.
            (2) Terms and conditions.--The basis for all land exchanges 
        under this subsection shall be a fair market appraisal so that 
        lands exchanged are of equal value.
    (b) Disposal and Acquisition of Lands, Allatoona Lake, Georgia.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may also sell lands above 
        863 feet in elevation at Allatoona Lake, Georgia, identified in 
        the memorandum referred to in subsection (a)(1) and may use the 
        proceeds to pay costs associated with the purchase of lands 
        needed for wildlife management and for protection of the water 
        quality and overall environment of Allatoona Lake.
            (2) Terms and conditions.--Land sales and purchases to be 
        conducted under this subsection shall be subject to the 
        following terms and conditions:
                    (A) Lands acquired under this subsection shall be 
                by negotiated purchase from willing sellers only.
                    (B) The basis for all transactions under the 
                program shall be a fair market appraisal acceptable to 
                the Secretary.
                    (C) The purchasers shall share in the associated 
                real estate costs, to include surveys and associated 
                fees in accordance with the memorandum referred to in 
                subsection (a)(1).
                    (D) Any other conditions that the Secretary may 
                impose.
    (c) Repeal.--Section 325 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4849) is repealed.

SEC. 3042. LATHAM RIVER, GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for improvement of the quality of the environment, Latham 
River, Glynn County, Georgia, being carried out under section 1135 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) shall be 
$6,175,000.

SEC. 3043. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR IMPROVEMENTS, IDAHO.

    The Secretary may carry out improvements to recreational facilities 
at the Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, North Fork, Clearwater River, Idaho, 
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 
1193), to accommodate lower pool levels.

SEC. 3044. BEARDSTOWN COMMUNITY BOAT HARBOR, BEARDSTOWN, ILLINOIS.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Muscooten Bay, 
Illinois River, Beardstown Community Boat Harbor, Beardstown, Illinois, 
constructed under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
U.S.C. 577), is modified--
            (1) to include the channel between the harbor and the 
        Illinois River; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to enter into a partnership 
        agreement with the city of Beardstown to replace the local 
        cooperation agreement dated August 18, 1983, with the 
        Beardstown Community Park District.
    (b) Terms of Partnership Agreement.--The partnership agreement 
referred to in subsection (a) shall include the same rights and 
responsibilities as the local cooperation agreement dated August 18, 
1983, changing only the identity of the non-Federal sponsor.
    (c) Maintenance.--Following execution of the partnership agreement 
referred to in subsection (a), the Secretary may carry out maintenance 
of the project referred to in subsection (a) on an annual basis.

SEC. 3045. CACHE RIVER LEVEE, ILLINOIS.

    The Cache River Levee constructed for flood control at the Cache 
River, Illinois, and authorized by the Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 
1217), is modified to add environmental restoration as a project 
purpose.

SEC. 3046. CHICAGO RIVER, ILLINOIS.

    The navigation channel for the North Branch Canal portion of the 
Chicago River, authorized by the first section of the Rivers and 
Harbors Appropriations Act of March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. 1129), extending 
from 100 feet downstream of the Halsted Street Bridge to 100 feet 
upstream of the Division Street Bridge is modified to be no wider than 
66 feet.

SEC. 3047. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIERS PROJECT, 
              ILLINOIS.

    (a) Treatment as Single Project.--The Chicago Sanitary and Ship 
Canal Dispersal Barrier Project (in this section referred to as 
``Barrier I'') (as in existence on the date of enactment of this Act), 
constructed as a demonstration project under section 1202(i)(3) of the 
Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 
U.S.C. 4722(i)(3)), and the project relating to the Chicago Sanitary 
and Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier, authorized by section 345 of the 
District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-335; 118 
Stat. 1352) (in this section referred to as ``Barrier II''), shall be 
considered to constitute a single project.
    (b) Authorization.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, at Federal expense, shall--
                    (A) upgrade and make permanent Barrier I;
                    (B) construct Barrier II, notwithstanding the 
                project cooperation agreement with the State of 
                Illinois dated June 14, 2005;
                    (C) operate and maintain Barrier I and Barrier II 
                as a system to optimize effectiveness;
                    (D) conduct, in consultation with appropriate 
                Federal, State, local, and nongovernmental entities, a 
                study of a range of options and technologies for 
                reducing impacts of hazards that may reduce the 
                efficacy of the Barriers; and
                    (E) provide to each State a credit in an amount 
                equal to the amount of funds contributed by the State 
                toward Barrier II.
            (2) Use of credit.--A State may apply a credit provided to 
        the State under paragraph (1)(E) to any cost sharing 
        responsibility for an existing or future Federal project 
        carried out by the Secretary in the State.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 345 of the District of Columbia 
Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-335; 118 Stat. 1352), is 
amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 345. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIER, 
              ILLINOIS.

    ``There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out the Barrier II project of the project for the 
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier, Illinois, initiated 
pursuant to section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 2294 note; 100 Stat. 4251).''.
    (d) Feasibility Study.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
appropriate Federal, State, local, and nongovernmental entities, shall 
conduct, at Federal expense, a feasibility study of the range of 
options and technologies available to prevent the spread of aquatic 
nuisance species between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River Basins 
through the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and other pathways.

SEC. 3048. EMIQUON, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may 
be expended for the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Emiquon, 
Illinois, being carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), shall be $7,500,000.
    (b) Limitation.--Nothing in this section shall affect the 
eligibility of the project for emergency repair assistance under 
section 5(a) of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction 
of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and 
for other purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).

SEC. 3049. LASALLE, ILLINOIS.

    In carrying out section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4639-4640), the Secretary shall give priority to 
work in the vicinity of LaSalle, Illinois, on the Illinois and Michigan 
Canal.

SEC. 3050. SPUNKY BOTTOMS, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Project Purpose.--The project for flood control, Spunky 
Bottoms, Illinois, authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act of 
June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1583), is modified to add environmental 
restoration as a project purpose.
    (b) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may 
be expended for the project for improvement of the quality of the 
environment, Spunky Bottoms, Illinois, being carried out under section 
1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), 
shall be $7,500,000.
    (c) Limitation.--Nothing in this section shall affect the 
eligibility of the project for emergency repair assistance under 
section 5(a) of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction 
of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and 
for other purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).

SEC. 3051. FORT WAYNE AND VICINITY, INDIANA.

    The project for flood control Fort Wayne, St. Mary's and Maumee 
Rivers, Indiana, authorized by section 101(a)(11) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4604), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to provide a 100-year level of 
        flood protection at the Berry-Thieme, Park-Thompson, Woodhurst, 
        and Tillman sites along the St. Mary's River, Fort Wayne and 
        vicinity, Indiana, at a total cost of $5,300,000; and
            (2) to allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
        financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to 
        the extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that 
        applying such section is necessary to implement the project.

SEC. 3052. KOONTZ LAKE, INDIANA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Koontz Lake, 
Indiana, being carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330) and modified by section 520 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2655), is 
further modified to direct the Secretary to seek to reduce the cost of 
the project by using innovative technologies and cost reduction 
measures determined from a review of non-Federal lake dredging projects 
in the vicinity of Koontz Lake.

SEC. 3053. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA.

    The project for flood control, Indianapolis on West Fork of White 
River, Indiana, authorized by section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and 
harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', approved June 22, 
1936 (49 Stat. 1586), and modified by section 323 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3716) and section 322 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 303-304), is 
further modified--
            (1) to authorize the Secretary to undertake the riverfront 
        alterations described in the Central Indianapolis Waterfront 
        Concept Plan, dated February 1994, for the Fall Creek Reach 
        feature at a total cost of $28,545,000; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of planning, 
        design, and construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
        interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
        project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral 
        to the project.

SEC. 3054. DES MOINES RIVER AND GREENBELT, IOWA.

    The project for the Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, 
Iowa, authorized by Public Law 99-88 and modified by section 604 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4153), is modified 
to include enhanced public access and recreational enhancements, at a 
Federal cost of $3,000,000.

SEC. 3055. RATHBUN LAKE, IOWA.

    (a) Right of First Refusal.--The Secretary shall provide, in 
accordance with the recommendations in the Rathbun Lake Reallocation 
Report approved by the Chief of Engineers on July 22, 1985, the Rathbun 
Regional Water Association with the right of first refusal to contract 
for or purchase any increment of the remaining allocation (8,320 acre-
feet) of water supply storage in Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
    (b) Payment of Cost.--The Rathbun Regional Water Association shall 
pay the cost of any water supply storage allocation provided under 
subsection (a).

SEC. 3056. PRESTONSBURG, KENTUCKY.

    The Prestonsburg, Kentucky, element of the project for flood 
control, Levisa and Tug Fork of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, 
West Virginia, Virginia, and Kentucky, authorized by section 202(a) of 
the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 
1339), is modified to direct the Secretary to take measures to provide 
a 100-year level of flood protection for the city of Prestonsburg.

SEC. 3057. AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, LOUISIANA, EAST BATON ROUGE 
              PARISH WATERSHED.

    The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Amite River 
and Tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish Watershed, 
authorized by section 101(a)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 277) and modified by section 116 of division D of 
Public Law 108-7 (117 Stat. 140), is further modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to carry out the project with 
        the cost sharing for the project determined in accordance with 
        section 103(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (33 U.S.C. 2213(a)), as in effect on October 11, 1996;
            (2) to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at 
        a total cost of $187,000,000; and
            (3) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work 
        carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
        determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3058. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--Section 315(a)(1) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2603-2604) is amended to read as 
follows:
            ``(1) is authorized to study, design, construct, operate, 
        and maintain, at Federal expense, a Type A Regional Visitor 
        Center in the vicinity of Morgan City, Louisiana, in 
        consultation with the State of Louisiana, to provide 
        information to the public on the Atchafalaya River system and 
        other associated waterways that have influenced surrounding 
        communities, and national and local water resources development 
        of the Army Corps of Engineers in South Central Louisiana; 
        and''.
    (b) Technical Correction.--Section 315(b) of such Act is amended by 
striking ``(a)'' and inserting ``(a)(2)''.
    (c) Donations.--Section 315 of such Act is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``(c) Donations.--In carrying out subsection (a)(1), the 
Mississippi River Commission is authorized to accept the donation of 
cash, funds, lands, materials, and services from non-Federal 
governmental entities and nonprofit corporations.''.

SEC. 3059. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LOUISIANA.

    The public access feature of the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System 
project, Louisiana, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act 1986 (100 Stat. 4142), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to acquire from willing sellers the fee interest, exclusive 
of oil, gas, and minerals, of an additional 20,000 acres of land within 
the Lower Atchafalaya Basin Floodway for the public access feature of 
the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, to enhance fish and wildlife 
resources, at a total cost of $4,000,000.

SEC. 3060. BAYOU PLAQUEMINE, LOUISIANA.

    The project for the improvement of the quality of the environment, 
Bayou Plaquemine, Louisiana, being carried out under section 1135 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.

SEC. 3061. J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO 
              SHREVEPORT, LOUISIANA.

    The project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses, J. Bennett 
Johnston Waterway, Mississippi River to Shreveport, Louisiana, 
authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4142) and modified by section 4(h) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4016), section 102(p) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4613), section 
301(b)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3710), and section 316 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2572), is further modified--
            (1) to authorize the purchase and reforesting of lands that 
        have been cleared or converted to agricultural uses; and
            (2) to incorporate current wildlife and forestry management 
        practices for the purpose of improving species diversity on 
        mitigation lands that meet Federal and State of Louisiana 
        habitat goals and objectives.

SEC. 3062. MELVILLE, LOUISIANA.

    Section 315(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2603) is amended by inserting before the period at the end 
the following: ``and may include the town of Melville, Louisiana, as 
one of the alternative sites''.

SEC. 3063. MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LOUISIANA.

    The Mississippi Delta Region project, Louisiana, authorized as part 
of the project for hurricane-flood protection on Lake Pontchartrain, 
Louisiana, by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
1077) and modified by section 365 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3739), is further modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the costs of relocating oyster beds in the Davis Pond project 
area if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
Mississippi Delta Region project.

SEC. 3064. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LOUISIANA.

    The New Orleans to Venice, Louisiana, project for hurricane 
protection, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 
(76 Stat. 1184), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out 
the work on the St. Jude to City Price, Upper Reach A back levee. The 
Federal share of the cost of such work shall be 70 percent.

SEC. 3065. WEST BANK OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (EAST OF HARVEY CANAL), 
              LOUISIANA.

    Section 328 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 304-305) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``operation and maintenance'' and 
                inserting ``operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, 
                repair, and replacement''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Algiers Channel'' and inserting 
                ``Algiers Canal Levees''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project shall be 35 percent.''.

SEC. 3066. CAMP ELLIS, SACO, MAINE.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project being carried out under section 111 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i) for the mitigation of shore damages 
attributable to the project for navigation, Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine, 
shall be $26,900,000.

SEC. 3067. DETROIT RIVER SHORELINE, DETROIT, MICHIGAN.

    (a) In General.--The project for emergency streambank and shoreline 
protection, Detroit River Shoreline, Detroit, Michigan, being carried 
out under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), 
is modified to include measures to enhance public access.
    (b) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project shall be $3,000,000.

SEC. 3068. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.

    Section 426 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 326) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 426. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.

    ``(a) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions 
apply:
            ``(1) Management plan.--The term `management plan' means 
        the management plan for the St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, 
        Michigan, that is in effect as of the date of enactment of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 2006.
            ``(2) Partnership.--The term `partnership' means the 
        partnership established by the Secretary under subsection 
        (b)(1).
    ``(b) Partnership.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish and lead a 
        partnership of appropriate Federal agencies (including the 
        Environmental Protection Agency) and the State of Michigan 
        (including political subdivisions of the State)--
                    ``(A) to promote cooperation among the Federal, 
                State, and local governments and other involved parties 
                in the management of the St. Clair River and Lake St. 
                Clair watersheds; and
                    ``(B) develop and implement projects consistent 
                with the management plan.
            ``(2) Coordination with actions under other law.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Actions taken under this section 
                by the partnership shall be coordinated with actions to 
                restore and conserve the St. Clair River and Lake St. 
                Clair and watersheds taken under other provisions of 
                Federal and State law.
                    ``(B) No effect on other law.--Nothing in this 
                section alters, modifies, or affects any other 
                provision of Federal or State law.
    ``(c) Implementation of St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair 
Management Plan.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall--
                    ``(A) develop a St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair 
                strategic implementation plan in accordance with the 
                management plan;
                    ``(B) provide technical, planning, and engineering 
                assistance to non-Federal interests for developing and 
                implementing activities consistent with the management 
                plan;
                    ``(C) plan, design, and implement projects 
                consistent with the management plan; and
                    ``(D) provide, in coordination with the 
                Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, 
                financial and technical assistance, including grants, 
                to the State of Michigan (including political 
                subdivisions of the State) and interested nonprofit 
                entities for the planning, design, and implementation 
                of projects to restore, conserve, manage, and sustain 
                the St. Clair River, Lake St. Clair, and associated 
                watersheds.
            ``(2) Specific measures.--Financial and technical 
        assistance provided under subparagraphs (B) and (C) of 
        paragraph (1) may be used in support of non-Federal activities 
        consistent with the management plan.
    ``(d) Supplements to Management Plan and Strategic Implementation 
Plan.--In consultation with the partnership and after providing an 
opportunity for public review and comment, the Secretary shall develop 
information to supplement--
            ``(1) the management plan; and
            ``(2) the strategic implementation plan developed under 
        subsection (c)(1)(A).
    ``(e) Cost Sharing.--
            ``(1) In-kind services.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
        of technical assistance under subsection (c), the cost of 
        planning, design, and construction of a project under 
        subsection (c), and the cost of development of supplementary 
        information under subsection (d) may be provided through the 
        provision of in-kind services.
            ``(2) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
        Secretary shall credit the non-Federal sponsor for the value of 
        any land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged material disposal 
        areas, or relocations required in carrying out a project under 
        subsection (c).
            ``(3) Nonprofit entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of 
        the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a non-
        Federal interest for any project carried out under this section 
        may include a nonprofit entity.
            ``(4) Operation and maintenance.--The operation, 
        maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of 
        projects carried out under this section shall be non-Federal 
        responsibilities.
    ``(f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for each fiscal 
year.''.

SEC. 3069. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall expedite development of the dredged material 
management plan for the project for navigation, St. Joseph Harbor, 
Michigan, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
(72 Stat. 299).

SEC. 3070. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, MICHIGAN.

    (a) In General.--The text of section 1149 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254) is amended to read as follows:
    ``The Secretary shall construct at Federal expense a second lock, 
of a width not less than 110 feet and a length not less than 1,200 
feet, adjacent to the existing lock at Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan, 
generally in accordance with the report of the Board of Engineers for 
Rivers and Harbors, dated May 19, 1986, and the limited reevaluation 
report dated February 2004 at a total cost of $341,714,000.''.
    (b) Conforming Repeals.--The following provisions are repealed:
            (1) Section 107(a)(8) of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4620).
            (2) Section 330 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1996 (110 Stat. 3717-3718).
            (3) Section 330 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1999 (113 Stat. 305).

SEC. 3071. ADA, MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, Wild Rice 
River, Ada, Minnesota, being carried out under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to consider national ecosystem restoration benefits in 
determining the Federal interest in the project.
    (b) Evaluation of Benefits and Costs.--In evaluating the economic 
benefits and costs for the project, the Secretary shall not consider 
the emergency levee adjacent to Judicial Ditch No. 51 in the 
determination of conditions existing prior to construction of the 
project.
    (c) Special Rule.--In evaluating and implementing the project, the 
Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that 
the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
necessary to implement the project.

SEC. 3072. DULUTH HARBOR, MCQUADE ROAD, MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Duluth Harbor, McQuade 
Road, Minnesota, being carried out under section 107 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and modified by section 321 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2605), is further 
modified to authorize the Secretary to provide public access and 
recreational facilities as generally described in the Detailed Project 
Report and Environmental Assessment, McQuade Road Harbor of Refuge, 
Duluth, Minnesota, dated August 1999.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall provide credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project for the costs of design work 
carried out before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.
    (c) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project shall be $9,000,000.

SEC. 3073. GRAND MARAIS, MINNESOTA.

    The project for navigation, Grand Marais, Minnesota, carried out 
under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) 
is modified to direct the Secretary to provide credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of design work 
carried out before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.

SEC. 3074. GRAND PORTAGE HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall provide credit toward the non-Federal share of 
the cost of the navigation project for Grand Portage Harbor, Minnesota, 
carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
U.S.C. 577), for the costs of design work carried out before the date 
of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3075. GRANITE FALLS, MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is directed to implement under 
section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) the 
locally preferred plan for flood damage reduction, Granite Falls, 
Minnesota, substantially in accordance with the detailed project report 
dated 2002, at a total cost of $12,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $8,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,000,000.
    (b) Project Financing.--In evaluating and implementing the project 
under this section, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interests 
to participate in the financing of the project in accordance with 
section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4184), to the extent that the detailed project report evaluation 
indicates that applying such section is necessary to implement the 
project.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the project the cost of design and construction work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest before the date of execution of a 
partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that 
the work is integral to the project.
    (d) Maximum Funding.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may 
be expended for the flood damage reduction shall be $8,000,000.

SEC. 3076. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

    The project for navigation, Harbor at Knife River, Minnesota, 
authorized by section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 2, 1945 
(59 Stat. 19), is modified to direct the Secretary to develop a final 
design and prepare plans and specifications to correct the harbor 
entrance and mooring conditions at the project.

SEC. 3077. RED LAKE RIVER, MINNESOTA.

    The project for flood control, Red Lake River, Crookston, 
Minnesota, authorized by section 101(a)(23) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), is modified to include flood 
protection for the adjacent and interconnected areas generally known as 
the Sampson and Chase/Loring neighborhoods, in accordance with the 
feasibility report supplement for local flood protection, Crookston, 
Minnesota, at a total cost of $25,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $16,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,750,000.

SEC. 3078. SILVER BAY, MINNESOTA.

    The project for navigation, Silver Bay, Minnesota, authorized by 
section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 19), 
is modified to include operation and maintenance of the general 
navigation facilities as a Federal responsibility.

SEC. 3079. TACONITE HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

    The project for navigation, Taconite Harbor, Minnesota, carried out 
under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
is modified to include operation and maintenance of the general 
navigation facilities as a Federal responsibility.

SEC. 3080. TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Two Harbors, 
Minnesota, being carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to include construction of a 
dredged material disposal facility, including actions required to clear 
the site.
    (b) Lands, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--Non-Federal interests 
shall be responsible for providing all lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
and relocations necessary for the construction of the dredged material 
disposal facility.
    (c) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project shall be $7,000,000.

SEC. 3081. DEER ISLAND, HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

    The project for ecosystem restoration, Deer Island, Harrison 
County, Mississippi, being carried out under section 204 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326), is modified to 
authorize the non-Federal interest to provide any portion of the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project in the form of in-kind 
services and materials.

SEC. 3082. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall complete a feasibility study 
for the project for flood damage reduction, Pearl River Watershed, 
Mississippi.
    (b) Comparison of Alternatives.--The feasibility study shall 
identify both the plan that maximizes national economic development 
benefits and the locally preferred plan and shall compare the level of 
flood damage reduction provided by each plan to that portion of 
Jackson, Mississippi, located below the Ross Barnett Reservoir Dam.
    (c) Recommended Plan.--If the Secretary determines that the locally 
preferred plan provides a level of flood damage reduction that is equal 
to or greater than the level of flood damage reduction provided by the 
national economic development plan and the locally preferred plan is 
technically feasible and environmentally protective, the Secretary 
shall recommend construction of the locally preferred plan.
    (d) Evaluation of Project Cost.--For the purposes of determining 
compliance with the first section of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 
1936 (33 U.S.C. 701a), the Secretary shall consider only the costs of 
the national economic development plan and shall exclude incremental 
costs associated with the locally preferred plan that are in excess of 
such costs if the non-Federal interest agrees to pay 100 percent of 
such incremental costs.
    (e) Non-Federal Cost Share.--If the locally preferred plan is 
authorized for construction, the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project shall be the same percentage as the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the national economic development plan plus all additional 
costs of construction associated with the locally preferred plan.

SEC. 3083. FESTUS AND CRYSTAL CITY, MISSOURI.

    Section 102(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 282) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting 
``$12,000,000''.

SEC. 3084. L-15 LEVEE, MISSOURI.

    The portion of the L-15 levee system that is under the jurisdiction 
of the Consolidated North County Levee District and situated along the 
right descending bank of the Mississippi River from the confluence of 
that river with the Missouri River and running upstream approximately 
14 miles shall be considered to be a Federal levee for purposes of cost 
sharing under section 5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).

SEC. 3085. MONARCH-CHESTERFIELD, MISSOURI.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Monarch-Chesterfield, 
Missouri, authorized by section 101(b)(18) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of the planning, design, and construction work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project.

SEC. 3086. RIVER DES PERES, MISSOURI.

    The projects for flood control, River Des Peres, Missouri, 
authorized by section 101(a)(17) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607) and section 102(13) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3668), are each modified to direct 
the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest before 
the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3087. ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NEBRASKA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Antelope Creek, Lincoln, 
Nebraska, authorized by section 101(b)(19) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of design and 
        construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
        before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if 
        the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
        project; and
            (2) to allow the non-Federal interest for the project to 
        use, and to direct the Secretary to accept, funds provided 
        under any other Federal program, to satisfy, in whole or in 
        part, the non-Federal share of the project if such funds are 
        authorized to be used to carry out the project.

SEC. 3088. SAND CREEK WATERSHED, WAHOO, NEBRASKA.

    The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage reduction, 
Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska, authorized by section 101(b)(20) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is 
modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to provide credit toward the 
        non-Federal share of the cost of the project or reimbursement 
        for the costs of any work that has been or will be performed by 
        the non-Federal interest before, on, or after the approval of 
        the project partnership agreement, including work performed by 
        the non-Federal interest in connection with the design and 
        construction of 7 upstream detention storage structures, if the 
        Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project;
            (2) to require that in-kind work to be credited under 
        paragraph (1) be subject to audit; and
            (3) to direct the Secretary to accept advance funds from 
        the non-Federal interest as needed to maintain the project 
        schedule.

SEC. 3089. WESTERN SARPY AND CLEAR CREEK, NEBRASKA.

    The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage reduction, 
authorized by section 101(b)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project at a total cost of $21,664,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $14,082,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$7,582,000.

SEC. 3090. LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, NEW JERSEY.

    The project for navigation mitigation, ecosystem restoration, shore 
protection, and hurricane and storm damage reduction, Lower Cape May 
Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey, authorized by section 101(a)(25) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), is 
modified to incorporate the project for shoreline erosion control, Cape 
May Point, New Jersey, carried out under section 5 of the Act entitled 
``An Act authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting 
the shores of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 
U.S.C. 426h), if the Secretary determines that such incorporation is 
feasible.

SEC. 3091. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MANAGEMENT, NEW JERSEY.

    The project for flood control, Passaic River, New Jersey and New 
York, authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607) and modified by section 327 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2607), is 
further modified to direct the Secretary to include the benefits and 
costs of preserving natural flood storage in any future economic 
analysis of the project.

SEC. 3092. BUFFALO HARBOR, NEW YORK.

    The project for navigation, Buffalo Harbor, New York, authorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176), is 
modified to include measures to enhance public access, at Federal cost 
of $500,000.

SEC. 3093. ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NEW YORK.

    Section 554 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3781) is amended by striking ``maximum Federal cost of 
$5,200,000'' and inserting ``total cost of $20,000,000''.

SEC. 3094. PORT OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

    The navigation project, Port of New York and New Jersey, New York 
and New Jersey, authorized by section 101(a)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2576), is modified--
            (1) to authorize the Secretary to allow the non-Federal 
        interest to construct a temporary dredged material storage 
        facility to receive dredged material from the project if--
                    (A) the non-Federal interest submits, in writing, a 
                list of potential sites for the temporary storage 
                facility to the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the 
                Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
                Senate, and the Secretary at least 180 days before the 
                selection of the final site; and
                    (B) at least 70 percent of the dredged material 
                generated in connection with the project suitable for 
                beneficial reuse will be used at sites in the State of 
                New Jersey to the extent that there are sufficient 
                sites available; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
        construction of the temporary storage facility if the Secretary 
        determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3095. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.

    Section 553(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3781) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) New York State Canal System Defined.--In this section, the 
term `New York State Canal System' means the 524 miles of navigable 
canal that comprise the New York State Canal System, including the 
Erie, Cayuga-Seneca, Oswego, and Champlain Canals and the historic 
alignments of these canals, including the cities of Albany, Rochester, 
and Buffalo.''.

SEC. 3096. LOWER GIRARD LAKE DAM, OHIO.

    Section 507(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3758) is amended by striking ``$2,500,000'' and inserting 
``$6,000,000''.

SEC. 3097. MAHONING RIVER, OHIO.

    In carrying out the project for environmental dredging, authorized 
by section 312(f)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 1272(f)(4)), the Secretary is directed to credit toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project.

SEC. 3098. DELAWARE RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA, NEW JERSEY, AND DELAWARE.

    The Secretary may remove debris from the project for navigation, 
Delaware River, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware, Philadelphia to 
the Sea.

SEC. 3099. RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary may take such action as may be necessary, including 
construction of a breakwater, to prevent shoreline erosion between .07 
and 2.7 miles south of Pennsylvania State Route 994 on the east shore 
of Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 3100. SHERADEN PARK STREAM AND CHARTIERS CREEK, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, 
              PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Sheraden Park Stream 
and Chartiers Creek, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, being carried out 
under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit up to 
$400,000 toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for 
planning and design work carried out by the non-Federal interest before 
the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3101. SOLOMON'S CREEK, WILKES-BARRE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for flood control, Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4124), is modified to include as a project element the 
project for flood control for Solomon's Creek, Wilkes-Barre, 
Pennsylvania.

SEC. 3102. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4845; 109 Stat. 407; 110 Stat. 3723; 113 Stat. 310; 117 Stat. 
142) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (g)(1) by striking ``$180,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$200,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (h)(2) by striking ``Allegheny, 
        Armstrong, Beford, Blair, Cambria, Clearfield, Fayette, 
        Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Huntingdon, Indiana, Juniata, 
        Mifflin, Somerset, Snyder, Washington, and Westmoreland 
        Counties'' and inserting ``Allegheny, Armstrong, Bedford, 
        Blair, Cambria, Fayette, Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Huntingdon, 
        Indiana, Juniata, Somerset, Washington, and Westmoreland 
        Counties''.

SEC. 3103. WYOMING VALLEY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    In carrying out the project for flood control, Wyoming Valley, 
Pennsylvania, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124), the Secretary shall 
coordinate with non-Federal interests to review opportunities for 
increased public access.

SEC. 3104. CEDAR BAYOU, TEXAS.

    (a) Credit for Planning and Design.--The project for navigation, 
Cedar Bayou, Texas, reauthorized by section 349(a)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2632), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project the cost of planning and design work carried out by the 
non-Federal interest for the project if the Secretary determines that 
such work is integral to the project.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Cost sharing for construction and operation and 
maintenance of the project shall be determined in accordance with 
section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2211).

SEC. 3105. FREEPORT HARBOR, TEXAS.

    The project for navigation, Freeport Harbor, Texas, authorized by 
section 101 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1818), is 
modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of the 
        planning, design, and construction work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement 
        for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
        integral to the project; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to remove the sunken vessel 
        ``COMSTOCK'' at Federal expense.

SEC. 3106. LAKE KEMP, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may not take any legal or 
administrative action seeking to remove a Lake Kemp improvement before 
the earlier of January 1, 2020, or the date of any transfer of 
ownership of the improvement occurring after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (b) Limitation on Liability.--The United States, or any of its 
officers, agents, or assignees, shall not be liable for any injury, 
loss, or damage accruing to the owners of a Lake Kemp improvement, 
their lessees, or occupants as a result of any flooding or inundation 
of such improvements by the waters of the Lake Kemp reservoir, or for 
such injury, loss, or damage as may occur through the operation and 
maintenance of the Lake Kemp dam and reservoir in any manner.
    (c) Lake Kemp Improvement Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Lake Kemp improvement'' means an improvement (including dwellings) 
located within the flowage easement of Lake Kemp, Texas, below 
elevation 1159 feet mean sea level.

SEC. 3107. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4125), is modified--
            (1) to include as part of the project flood protection 
        works to reroute drainage to Raymondville Drain constructed by 
        the non-Federal interests in Hidalgo County in the vicinity of 
        Edinburg, Texas, if the Secretary determines that such work 
        meets feasibility requirements;
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of planning, 
        design, and construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
        interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
        project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral 
        to the project; and
            (3) to direct the Secretary in calculating the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project, to make a determination, 
        within 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, under 
        section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)) on the non-Federal interest's ability to 
        pay.

SEC. 3108. NORTH PADRE ISLAND, CORPUS CHRISTI BAY, TEXAS.

    The project for ecosystem restoration and storm damage reduction, 
North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas, authorized by section 
556 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 353), is 
modified to include recreation as a project purpose.

SEC. 3109. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TEXAS.

    The Secretary is directed to accept from the city of Paris, Texas, 
$3,461,432 as payment in full of monies owed to the United States for 
water supply storage space in Pat Mayse Lake, Texas, under contract 
number DA-34-066-CIVENG-65-1272, including accrued interest.

SEC. 3110. PROCTOR LAKE, TEXAS.

    The Secretary is authorized to purchase fee simple title to all 
properties located within the boundaries, and necessary for the 
operation, of the Proctor Lake project, Texas, authorized by section 
203 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1259).

SEC. 3111. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, San Antonio Channel, Texas, 
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 
1259) as part of the comprehensive plan for flood protection on the 
Guadalupe and San Antonio Rivers in Texas and modified by section 103 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2921) and 
section 335 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
2611), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to credit toward 
the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of design and 
construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.

SEC. 3112. TANGIER ISLAND SEAWALL, VIRGINIA.

    Section 577(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3789) is amended by striking ``at a total cost of $1,200,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $900,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $300,000.'' and inserting ``at a total cost of $3,000,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $2,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $750,000.''.

SEC. 3113. DUWAMISH/GREEN, WASHINGTON.

    The project for ecosystem restoration, Duwamish/Green, Washington, 
authorized by section 101(b)(26) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2579), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work 
        carried out by the non-Federal interest before, on, or after 
        the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the 
        Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project; 
        and
            (2) to authorize the non-Federal interest to provide any 
        portion of the non-Federal share of the cost of the project in 
        the form of in-kind services and materials.

SEC. 3114. YAKIMA RIVER, PORT OF SUNNYSIDE, WASHINGTON.

    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Yakima River, Port 
of Sunnyside, Washington, being carried out under section 206 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the project 
if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 3115. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 102(ff) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4810, 110 Stat. 3726, 113 Stat. 312) is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(ff) Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia.--
            ``(1) In general.--The project for flood control, Bluestone 
        Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia, authorized by section 4 
        of the Flood Control Act of 1938 (52 Stat. 1217) is modified to 
        direct the Secretary to implement Plan C/G, as defined in the 
        Evaluation Report of the District Engineer dated December 1996, 
        to prohibit the release of drift and debris into waters 
        downstream of the project, except for that organic matter 
        necessary to maintain and enhance the biological resources of 
        such waters and such nonobtrusive items of debris as may not be 
        economically feasible to prevent being released through such 
        project, including measures to prevent the accumulation of 
        drift and debris at the project, the collection and removal of 
        drift and debris on the segment of the New River upstream of 
        the project, and the removal (through use of temporary or 
        permanent systems) and disposal of accumulated drift and debris 
        at Bluestone Dam.
            ``(2) Cooperative agreement.--In carrying out the 
        downstream cleanup under the plan referred to in paragraph (1), 
        the Secretary may enter into a cooperative agreement with the 
        West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection for the 
        department to carry out the cleanup, including contracting and 
        procurement services, contract administration and management, 
        transportation and disposal of collected materials, and 
        disposal fees.
            ``(3) Initial cleanup.--The Secretary may provide the 
        department up to $150,000 from funds previously appropriated 
        for this purpose for the Federal share of the costs of the 
        initial cleanup under the plan.''.

SEC. 3116. GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 579(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3790; 113 Stat. 312) is amended by striking ``$47,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$99,000,000''.

SEC. 3117. LESAGE/GREENBOTTOM SWAMP, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 30(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 
Stat. 4030; 114 Stat. 2678) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(d) Historic Structure.--The Secretary shall ensure the 
preservation and restoration of the structure known as the `Jenkins 
House', and the reconstruction of associated buildings and landscape 
features of such structure located within the Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp 
in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's standards for the 
treatment of historic properties. Amounts made available for 
expenditure for the project authorized by section 301(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4110) shall be available 
for the purposes of this subsection.''.

SEC. 3118. NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 557 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 353) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence by striking ``favorable'';
            (2) by striking ``$8,400,000'' and inserting 
        ``$12,000,000''; and
            (3) by striking ``$4,200,000'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``$6,000,000''.

SEC. 3119. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WISCONSIN.

    The project for navigation, Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin, authorized 
by the River and Harbor Act of August 30, 1852 (10 Stat. 58), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to deepen the upstream reach of the 
navigation channel from 12 feet to 18 feet, at a total cost of 
$405,000.

SEC. 3120. MISSISSIPPI RIVER HEADWATERS RESERVOIRS.

    Section 21 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 
Stat. 4027) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``1276.42'' and inserting 
                ``1278.42'';
                    (B) by striking ``1218.31'' and inserting 
                ``1221.31''; and
                    (C) by striking ``1234.82'' and inserting 
                ``1235.30''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Exception.--The Secretary may operate the headwaters 
reservoirs below the minimum or above the maximum water levels 
established in subsection (a) in accordance with water control 
regulation manuals (or revisions thereto) developed by the Secretary, 
after consultation with the Governor of Minnesota and affected tribal 
governments, landowners, and commercial and recreational users. The 
water control regulation manuals (and any revisions thereto) shall be 
effective when the Secretary transmits them to Congress. The Secretary 
shall report to Congress at least 14 days before operating any such 
headwaters reservoir below the minimum or above the maximum water level 
limits specified in subsection (a); except that notification is not 
required for operations necessary to prevent the loss of life or to 
ensure the safety of the dam or if the drawdown of lake levels is in 
anticipation of flood control operations.''.

SEC. 3121. CONTINUATION OF PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 1001(b)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)), the following 
projects shall remain authorized to be carried out by the Secretary:
            (1) The project for navigation, Sacramento Deep Water Ship 
        Channel, California, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092).
            (2) The project for flood control, Agana River, Guam, 
        authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4127).
            (3) The project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor and 
        Channels, Maryland and Virginia, authorized by section 101 of 
        the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1818).
            (4) The project for navigation, Fall River Harbor, 
        Massachusetts, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
        Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731); except that the authorized 
        depth of that portion of the project extending riverward of the 
        Charles M. Braga, Jr. Memorial Bridge, Fall River and Somerset, 
        Massachusetts, shall not exceed 35 feet.
    (b) Limitation.--A project described in subsection (a) shall not be 
authorized for construction after the last day of the 5-year period 
beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, unless, during such 
period, funds have been obligated for the construction (including 
planning and design) of the project.

SEC. 3122. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

    Each of the following projects may be carried out by the Secretary 
and no construction on any such project may be initiated until the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible:
            (1) Menominee harbor and river, michigan and wisconsin.--
        The project for navigation, Menominee Harbor and River, 
        Michigan and Wisconsin, authorized by section 101 of the River 
        and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 482) and deauthorized on April 
        15, 2002, in accordance with section 1001(b)(2) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)).
            (2) Manitowoc harbor, wisconsin.--That portion of the 
        project for navigation, Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin, authorized 
        by the first section of the River and Harbor Act of August 30, 
        1852 (10 Stat. 58), consisting of the channel in the south part 
        of the outer harbor, deauthorized by section 101 of the River 
        and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176).
            (3) Hearding island inlet, duluth harbor, minnesota.--The 
        project for dredging, Hearding Island Inlet, Duluth Harbor, 
        Minnesota, authorized by section 22 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4027).

SEC. 3123. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The following projects are not authorized after 
the date of enactment of this Act:
            (1) Bridgeport harbor, connecticut.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, 
        authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor Act of 
        July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 919), consisting of an 18-foot channel 
        in Yellow Mill River and described as follows: Beginning at a 
        point along the eastern limit of the existing project, 
        N123,649.75, E481,920.54, thence running northwesterly about 
        52.64 feet to a point N123,683.03, E481,879.75, thence running 
        northeasterly about 1,442.21 feet to a point N125,030.08, 
        E482,394.96, thence running northeasterly about 139.52 feet to 
        a point along the eastern limit of the existing channel, 
        N125,133.87, E482,488.19, thence running southwesterly about 
        1,588.98 feet to the point of origin.
            (2) Mystic river, connecticut.--The portion of the project 
        for navigation, Mystic River, Connecticut, authorized by the 
        first section of the River and Harbor Appropriations Act of 
        September 19, 1890 (26 Stat. 436) consisting of a 12-foot-deep 
        channel, approximately 7,554 square feet in area, starting at a 
        point N193,086.51, E815,092.78, thence running north 59 degrees 
        21 minutes 46.63 seconds west about 138.05 feet to a point 
        N193,156.86, E814,974.00, thence running north 51 degrees 04 
        minutes 39.00 seconds west about 166.57 feet to a point 
        N193,261.51, E814,844.41, thence running north 43 degrees 01 
        minutes 34.90 seconds west about 86.23 feet to a point 
        N193,324.55, E814,785.57, thence running north 06 degrees 42 
        minutes 03.86 seconds west about 156.57 feet to a point 
        N193,480.05, E814,767.30, thence running south 21 degrees 21 
        minutes 17.94 seconds east about 231.42 feet to a point 
        N193,264.52, E814,851.57, thence running south 53 degrees 34 
        minutes 23.28 seconds east about 299.78 feet to the point of 
        origin.
            (3) New london harbor, connecticut.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, New London Harbor, Connecticut, 
        authorized by the River and Harbor Appropriations Act of June 
        13, 1902 (32 Stat. 333), that consists of a 23-foot waterfront 
        channel and that is further described as beginning at a point 
        along the western limit of the existing project, N188,802.75, 
        E779,462.81, thence running northeasterly about 1,373.88 feet 
        to a point N189,554.87, E780,612.53, thence running 
        southeasterly about 439.54 feet to a point N189,319.88, 
        E780,983.98, thence running southwesterly about 831.58 feet to 
        a point N188,864.63, E780,288.08, thence running southeasterly 
        about 567.39 feet to a point N188,301.88, E780,360.49, thence 
        running northwesterly about 1,027.96 feet to the point of 
        origin.
            (4) Rockland harbor, maine.--The portion of the project for 
        navigation, Rockland Harbor, Maine, authorized by the Act of 
        June 3, 1896 (29 Stat. 202), consisting of a 14-foot channel 
        located in Lermond Cove and beginning at a point with 
        coordinates N9977.37, E340290.02, thence running easterly about 
        200.00 feet to a point with coordinates N99978.49, E340490.02, 
        thence running northerly about 138.00 feet to a point with 
        coordinates N100116.49, E340289.25, thence running westerly 
        about 200.00 feet to a point with coordinates N100115.37, 
        E340289.25, thence running southerly about 138.00 feet to the 
        point of origin.
            (5) Falmouth harbor, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, th Harbor, Massachusetts, authorized by 
        section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 
        1172), beginning at a point along the eastern side of the inner 
        harbor N200,415.05, E845,307.98, thence running north 25 
        degrees 48 minutes 54.3 seconds east 160.24 feet to a point 
        N200,559.20, E845,377.76, thence running north 22 degrees 7 
        minutes 52.4 seconds east 596.82 feet to a point N201,112.15, 
        E845,602.60, thence running north 60 degrees 1 minute 0.3 
        seconds east 83.18 feet to a point N201,153.72, E845,674.65, 
        thence running south 24 degrees 56 minutes 43.4 seconds west 
        665.01 feet to a point N200,550.75, E845,394.18, thence running 
        south 32 degrees 25 minutes 29.0 seconds west 160.76 feet to 
        the point of origin.
            (6) Island end river, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Island End River, Massachusetts, 
        carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
        1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), described as follows: Beginning at a 
        point along the eastern limit of the existing project, 
        N507,348.98, E721,180.01, thence running northeast about 35 
        feet to a point N507,384.17, E721,183.36, thence running 
        northeast about 324 feet to a point N507,590.51, E721,433.17, 
        thence running northeast about 345 feet to a point along the 
        northern limit of the existing project, N507,927.29, 
        E721,510.29, thence running southeast about 25 feet to a point 
        N507,921.71, E721,534.66, thence running southwest about 354 
        feet to a point N507,576.65, E721,455.64, thence running 
        southwest about 357 feet to the point of origin.
            (7) City waterway, tacoma, washington.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, City Waterway, Tacoma, Washington, 
        authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor 
        Appropriations Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 347), consisting 
        of the last 1,000 linear feet of the inner portion of the 
        waterway beginning at station 70+00 and ending at station 
        80+00.
            (8) Aunt lydia's cove, massachusetts.--
                    (A) In general.--The portion of the project for 
                navigation, Aunt Lydia's Cove, Massachusetts, 
                constructed under section 107 of the River and Harbor 
                Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), consisting of the 8-foot 
                deep anchorage in the cove described in subparagraph 
                (B).
                    (B) Description of portion.--The portion of the 
                project described in subparagraph (A) is more 
                particularly described as the portion beginning at a 
                point along the southern limit of the existing project, 
                N254,332.00, E1,023,103.96, thence running 
                northwesterly about 761.60 feet to a point along the 
                western limit of the existing project N255,076.84, 
                E1,022,945.07, thence running southwesterly about 38.11 
                feet to a point N255,038.99, E1,022,940.60, thence 
                running southeasterly about 267.07 feet to a point 
                N254,772.00, E1,022,947.00, thence running 
                southeasterly about 462.41 feet to a point N254,320.06, 
                E1,023,044.84, thence running northeasterly about 60.31 
                feet to the point of origin.
    (b) Southport Harbor, Fairfield, Connecticut.--The project for 
navigation, Southport Harbor, Fairfield, Connecticut, authorized by 
section 2 of the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1829, and by the 
first section of the River and Harbor Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 
1029), and section 364 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3733-3734), is further modified to redesignate a portion of 
the 9-foot-deep channel as an anchorage area, approximately 900 feet in 
length and 90,000 square feet in area, and lying generally north of a 
line with points at coordinates N108,043.45, E452,252.04 and 
N107,938.74, E452,265.74.
    (c) Saco River, Maine.--The portion of the project for navigation, 
Saco River, Maine, authorized under section 107 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and described as a 6-foot deep, 10-acre 
turning basin located at the head of navigation, is redesignated as an 
anchorage area.
    (d) Union River, Maine.--The project for navigation, Union River, 
Maine, authorized by the first section of the Act of June 3, 1896 (29 
Stat. 215), is modified by redesignating as an anchorage area that 
portion of the project consisting of a 6-foot turning basin and lying 
northerly of a line commencing at a point N315,975.13, E1,004,424.86, 
thence running north 61 degrees 27 minutes 20.71 seconds west about 
132.34 feet to a point N316,038.37, E1,004,308.61.
    (e) Mystic River, Massachusetts.--The portion of the project for 
navigation, Mystic River, Massachusetts, authorized by the first 
section of the River and Harbor Appropriations Act of July 13, 1892 (27 
Stat. 96), between a line starting at a point N515,683.77, E707,035.45 
and ending at a point N515,721.28, E707,069.85 and a line starting at a 
point N514,595.15, E707,746.15 and ending at a point N514,732.94, 
E707,658.38 shall be relocated and reduced from a 100-foot wide channel 
to a 50-foot wide channel after the date of enactment of this Act 
described as follows: Beginning at a point N515,721.28, E707,069.85, 
thence running southeasterly about 840.50 feet to a point N515,070.16, 
E707,601.27, thence running southeasterly about 177.54 feet to a point 
N514,904.84, E707,665.98, thence running southeasterly about 319.90 
feet to a point with coordinates N514,595.15, E707,746.15, thence 
running northwesterly about 163.37 feet to a point N514,732.94, 
E707,658.38, thence running northwesterly about 161.58 feet to a point 
N514.889.47, E707,618.30, thence running northwesterly about 166.61 
feet to a point N515.044.62, E707,557.58, thence running northwesterly 
about 825.31 feet to a point N515,683.77, E707,035.45, thence running 
northeasterly about 50.90 feet returning to a point N515,721.28, 
E707,069.85.
    (f) Conditions.--The first sentence of section 1001(b)(2) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``two years'' and inserting ``year''; and
            (2) by striking ``7'' and inserting ``5''.

SEC. 3124. LAND CONVEYANCES.

    (a) St. Francis Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the State of 
        Arkansas, without monetary consideration and subject to 
        paragraph (2), all right, title, and interest in and to real 
        property within the State acquired by the Federal Government as 
        mitigation land for the project for flood control, St. Francis 
        Basin, Arkansas and Missouri Project, authorized by the Flood 
        Control Act of May 15, 1928 (33 U.S.C. 702a et seq.).
            (2) Terms and conditions.--
                    (A) In general.--The conveyance by the United 
                States under this subsection shall be subject to--
                            (i) the condition that the State of 
                        Arkansas agree to operate, maintain, and manage 
                        the real property for fish and wildlife, 
                        recreation, and environmental purposes at no 
                        cost or expense to the United States; and
                            (ii) such other terms and conditions as the 
                        Secretary determines to be in the interest of 
                        the United States.
                    (B) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that 
                the real property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases 
                to be held in public ownership or the State ceases to 
                operate, maintain, and manage the real property in 
                accordance with this subsection, all right, title, and 
                interest in and to the property shall revert to the 
                United States, at the option of the Secretary.
            (3) Mitigation.--Nothing in this subsection extinguishes 
        the responsibility of the Federal Government or the non-Federal 
        interest for the project referred to in paragraph (1) from the 
        obligation to implement mitigation for such project that 
        existed on the day prior to the transfer authorized by this 
        subsection.
    (b) Milford, Kansas.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey by quitclaim 
        deed without consideration to the Geary County Fire Department, 
        Milford, Kansas, all right, title, and interest of the United 
        States in and to real property consisting of approximately 7.4 
        acres located in Geary County, Kansas, for construction, 
        operation, and maintenance of a fire station.
            (2) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the real 
        property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in 
        public ownership or ceases to be operated and maintained as a 
        fire station, all right, title, and interest in and to the 
        property shall revert to the United States, at the option of 
        the United States.
    (c) Pike County, Missouri.--
            (1) In general.--At such time as S.S.S., Inc., conveys all 
        right, title and interest in and to the real property described 
        in paragraph (2)(A) to the United States, the Secretary shall 
        convey all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
        and to the real property described in paragraph (2)(B) to 
        S.S.S., Inc.
            (2) Land description.--The parcels of land referred to in 
        paragraph (1) are the following:
                    (A) Non-federal land.--Approximately 42 acres, the 
                exact legal description to be determined by mutual 
                agreement of S.S.S., Inc., and the Secretary, subject 
                to any existing flowage easements situated in Pike 
                County, Missouri, upstream and northwest, about a 200-
                foot distance from Drake Island (also known as Grimes 
                Island).
                    (B) Federal land.--Approximately 42 acres, the 
                exact legal description to be determined by mutual 
                agreement of S.S.S. Inc., and the Secretary, situated 
                in Pike County, Missouri, known as Government Tract 
                Numbers MIs-7 and a portion of FM-46 (both tracts on 
                Buffalo Island), administered by the Corps of 
                Engineers.
            (3) Conditions.--The exchange of real property under 
        paragraph (1) shall be subject to the following conditions:
                    (A) Deeds.--
                            (i) Non-federal land.--The conveyance of 
                        the real property described in paragraph (2)(A) 
                        to the Secretary shall be by a warranty deed 
                        acceptable to the Secretary.
                            (ii) Federal land.--The instrument of 
                        conveyance used to convey the real property 
                        described in paragraph (2)(B) to S.S.S., Inc., 
                        shall be by quitclaim deed and contain such 
                        reservations, terms, and conditions as the 
                        Secretary considers necessary to allow the 
                        United States to operate and maintain the 
                        Mississippi River 9-Foot Navigation Project.
                    (B) Removal of improvements.--S.S.S., Inc., may 
                remove, and the Secretary may require S.S.S., Inc., to 
                remove, any improvements on the land described in 
                paragraph (2)(A).
                    (C) Time limit for exchange.--The land exchange 
                under paragraph (1) shall be completed not later than 2 
                years after the date of enactment of this Act.
            (4) Value of properties.--If the appraised fair market 
        value, as determined by the Secretary, of the real property 
        conveyed to S.S.S., Inc., by the Secretary under paragraph (1) 
        exceeds the appraised fair market value, as determined by the 
        Secretary, of the real property conveyed to the United States 
        by S.S.S., Inc., under paragraph (1), S.S.S., Inc., shall make 
        a payment to the United States equal to the excess in cash or a 
        cash equivalent that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
    (d) Boardman, Oregon.--Section 501(g)(1) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3751) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``city of Boardman,'' and inserting ``the 
        Boardman Park and Recreation District, Boardman,''; and
            (2) by striking ``such city'' and inserting ``the city of 
        Boardman''.
    (e) Lowell, Oregon.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may convey without 
        consideration to Lowell School District, by quitclaim deed, all 
        right, title, and interest of the United States in and to land 
        and buildings thereon, known as Tract A-82, located in Lowell, 
        Oregon, and described in paragraph (2).
            (2) Description of property.--The parcel of land authorized 
        to be conveyed under paragraph (1) is as follows: Commencing at 
        the point of intersection of the west line of Pioneer Street 
        with the westerly extension of the north line of Summit Street, 
        in Meadows Addition to Lowell, as platted and recorded at page 
        56 of Volume 4, Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence north 
        on the west line of Pioneer Street a distance of 176.0 feet to 
        the true point of beginning of this description; thence north 
        on the west line of Pioneer Street a distance of 170.0 feet; 
        thence west at right angles to the west line of Pioneer Street 
        a distance of 250.0 feet; thence south and parallel to the west 
        line of Pioneer Street a distance of 170.0 feet; thence east 
        250.0 feet to the true point of beginning of this description 
        in Section 14, Township 19 South, Range 1 West of the 
        Willamette Meridian, Lane County, Oregon.
            (3) Terms and conditions.--Before conveying the parcel to 
        the school district, the Secretary shall ensure that the 
        conditions of buildings and facilities meet the requirements of 
        applicable Federal law.
            (4) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the 
        property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in 
        public ownership, all right, title, and interest in and to the 
        property shall revert to the United States, at the option of 
        the United States.
    (f) Lowell, Oregon.--
            (1) Release and extinguishment of deed reservations.--
                    (A) Release and extinguishment of deed 
                reservations.--The Secretary may release and extinguish 
                the deed reservations for access and communication 
                cables contained in the quitclaim deed, dated January 
                26, 1965, and recorded February 15, 1965, in the 
                records of Lane County, Oregon; except that such 
                reservations may only be released and extinguished for 
                the lands owned by the city of Lowell as described in 
                the quitclaim deed, dated April 11, 1991, in such 
                records.
                    (B) Additional release and extinguishment of deed 
                reservations.--The Secretary may also release and 
                extinguish the same deed reservations referred to in 
                subparagraph (A) over land owned by Lane County, 
                Oregon, within the city limits of Lowell, Oregon, to 
                accommodate the development proposals of the city of 
                Lowell/St. Vincent de Paul, Lane County, affordable 
                housing project; except that the Secretary may require, 
                at no cost to the United States--
                            (i) the alteration or relocation of any 
                        existing facilities, utilities, roads, or 
                        similar improvements on such lands; and
                            (ii) the right-of-way for such facilities, 
                        utilities, or improvements, as a pre-condition 
                        of any release or extinguishment of the deed 
                        reservations.
            (2) Conveyance.--The Secretary may convey to the city of 
        Lowell, Oregon, at fair market value the parcel of land 
        situated in the city of Lowell, Oregon, at fair market value 
        consisting of the strip of federally-owned lands located 
        northeast of West Boundary Road between Hyland Lane and the 
        city of Lowell's eastward city limits.
            (3) Administrative cost.--Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) 
        and (2), the city of Lowell, Oregon, shall pay the 
        administrative costs incurred by the United States to execute 
        the release and extinguishment of the deed reservations under 
        paragraph (1) and the conveyance under paragraph (2).
    (g) Richard B. Russell Lake, South Carolina.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the State of 
        South Carolina, by quitclaim deed, at fair market value, all 
        right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
        real property described in paragraph (2) that is managed, as of 
        the date of enactment of this Act, by the South Carolina 
        department of commerce for public recreation purposes for the 
        Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, South Carolina, project 
        authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 
        Stat. 1420).
            (2) Land description.--Subject to paragraph (3), the real 
        property referred to in paragraph (1) is the parcel contained 
        in the portion of real property described in Army Lease Number 
        DACW21-1-92-0500.
            (3) Reservation of interests.--The United States shall 
        reserve--
                    (A) ownership of all real property included in the 
                lease referred to in paragraph (2) that would have been 
                acquired for operational purposes in accordance with 
                the 1971 implementation of the 1962 Army/Interior Joint 
                Acquisition Policy; and
                    (B) such other rights and interests in and to the 
                real property to be conveyed as the Secretary considers 
                necessary for authorized project purposes, including 
                easement rights-of-way to remaining Federal land.
            (4) No effect on shore management policy.--The Shoreline 
        Management Policy (ER-1130-2-406) of the Corps of Engineers 
        shall not be changed or altered for any proposed development of 
        land conveyed under this subsection.
            (5) Cost sharing.--In carrying out the conveyance under 
        this subsection, the Secretary and the State shall comply with 
        all obligations of any cost-sharing agreement between the 
        Secretary and the State with respect to the real property 
        described in paragraph (2) in effect as of the date of the 
        conveyance.
            (6) Land not conveyed.--The State shall continue to manage 
        the real property described in paragraph (3) not conveyed under 
        this subsection in accordance with the terms and conditions of 
        Army Lease Number DACW21-1-92-0500.
    (h) Denison, Texas.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall offer to convey at 
        fair market value to the city of Denison, Texas, all right, 
        title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
        approximately 900 acres of land located in Grayson County, 
        Texas, which is currently subject to an application for lease 
        for public park and recreational purposes made by the city of 
        Denison, dated August 17, 2005.
            (2) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
        and description of the real property referred to in paragraph 
        (1) shall be determined by a survey paid for by the city of 
        Denison, Texas, that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
            (3) Conveyance.--On acceptance by the city of Denison, 
        Texas, of an offer under paragraph (1), the Secretary may 
        immediately convey the land surveyed under paragraph (2) by 
        quitclaim deed to the city of Denison, Texas.
    (i) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
            (1) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
        and the legal description of any real property to be conveyed 
        under this section shall be determined by a survey that is 
        satisfactory to the Secretary.
            (2) Applicability of property screening provisions.--
        Section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply 
        to any conveyance under this section.
            (3) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may 
        require that any conveyance under this section be subject to 
        such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers 
        appropriate and necessary to protect the interests of the 
        United States.
            (4) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a conveyance 
        is made under this section shall be responsible for all 
        reasonable and necessary costs, including real estate 
        transaction and environmental documentation costs, associated 
        with the conveyance.
            (5) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is made 
        under this section shall hold the United States harmless from 
        any liability with respect to activities carried out, on or 
        after the date of the conveyance, on the real property 
        conveyed. The United States shall remain responsible for any 
        liability with respect to activities carried out, before such 
        date, on the real property conveyed.

SEC. 3125. EXTINGUISHMENT OF REVERSIONARY INTERESTS AND USE 
              RESTRICTIONS.

    (a) Idaho.--
            (1) In general.--With respect to the property covered by 
        each deed in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) the reversionary interests and use restrictions 
                relating to port and industrial use purposes are 
                extinguished;
                    (B) the restriction that no activity shall be 
                permitted that will compete with services and 
                facilities offered by public marinas is extinguished; 
                and
                    (C) the human habitation or other building 
                structure use restriction is extinguished if the 
                elevation of the property is above the standard project 
                flood elevation.
            (2) Affected deeds.--The deeds with the following county 
        auditor's file numbers are referred to in paragraph (1):
                    (A) Auditor's Instrument No. 399218 of Nez Perce 
                County, Idaho--2.07 acres.
                    (B) Auditor's Instrument No. 487437 of Nez Perce 
                County, Idaho--7.32 acres.
    (b) Lake Texoma, Oklahoma.--
            (1) Release of reversionary interest.--Any reversionary 
        interest relating to public parks and recreation on the land 
        conveyed by the Secretary to the State of Oklahoma at Lake 
        Texoma pursuant to the Act entitled ``An Act to authorize the 
        sale of certain lands to the State of Oklahoma'', approved June 
        16, 1953 (67 Stat. 63), is terminated as of the date of 
        enactment of this Act.
            (2) Instrument of release.--As soon as practicable after 
        the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall execute 
        and file in the appropriate office a deed of release, an 
        amended deed, or another appropriate instrument to release each 
        reversionary interest described in subsection (a).
            (3) Preservation of reserved rights.--Release of a 
        reversionary interest in accordance with this section shall not 
        be construed to affect any other right excepted or reserved for 
        the United States in a deed of conveyance made pursuant to such 
        Act of June 16, 1953.
    (c) Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Cumberland River, Tennessee.--
            (1) Release of retained rights, interests, reservations.--
        With respect to land conveyed by the Secretary to the Tennessee 
        Society of Crippled Children and Adults, Incorporated (commonly 
        known as ``Easter Seals Tennessee'') at Old Hickory Lock and 
        Dam, Cumberland River, Tennessee, under section 211 of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1087), the reversionary 
        interests and the use restrictions relating to recreation and 
        camping purposes are extinguished.
            (2) Instrument of release.--As soon as practicable after 
        the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall execute 
        and file in the appropriate office a deed of release, amended 
        deed, or other appropriate instrument effectuating the release 
        of interests required by paragraph (1).
    (d) Port of Pasco, Washington.--
            (1) Extinguishment of use restrictions and flowage 
        easement.--With respect to the property covered by the deed in 
        paragraph (3)(A)--
                    (A) the flowage easement and human habitation or 
                other building structure use restriction is 
                extinguished if the elevation of the property is above 
                the standard project flood elevation; and
                    (B) the use of fill material to raise areas of the 
                property above the standard project flood elevation is 
                authorized, except in any area for which a permit under 
                section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
                (33 U.S.C. 1344) is required.
            (2) Extinguishment of flowage easement.--With respect to 
        the property covered by each deed in paragraph (3)(B), the 
        flowage easement is extinguished if the elevation of the 
        property is above the standard project flood elevation.
            (3) Affected deeds.--The deeds referred to in paragraphs 
        (1) and (2) are as follows:
                    (A) Auditor's File Number 262980 of Franklin 
                County, Washington.
                    (B) Auditor's File Numbers 263334 and 404398 of 
                Franklin County, Washington.
    (e) No Effect on Other Rights.--Nothing in this section affects the 
remaining rights and interests of the Corps of Engineers for authorized 
project purposes.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

SEC. 4001. JOHN GLENN GREAT LAKES BASIN PROGRAM.

    Section 455 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-21) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) In-Kind Contributions for Study.--The non-Federal interest 
may provide up to 100 percent of the non-Federal share required under 
subsection (f) in the form of in-kind services and materials.''.

SEC. 4002. LAKE ERIE DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the nature and 
frequency of avian botulism problems in the vicinity of Lake Erie 
associated with dredged material disposal sites and shall make 
recommendations to eliminate the conditions that result in such 
problems.

SEC. 4003. SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES DROUGHT STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary 
of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of 
Commerce, and other appropriate agencies, shall conduct, at Federal 
expense, a comprehensive study of drought conditions in the 
southwestern United States, with particular emphasis on the Colorado 
River basin, the Rio Grande River basin, and the Great Basin.
    (b) Inventory of Actions.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
shall assemble an inventory of actions taken or planned to be taken to 
address drought-related situations in the southwestern United States.
    (c) Purpose.--The purpose of the study shall be to develop 
recommendations to more effectively address current and future drought 
conditions in the southwestern United States.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $7,000,000. 
Such funds shall remain available until expended.

SEC. 4004. DELAWARE RIVER.

    The Secretary shall review, in consultation with the Delaware River 
Basin Commission and the States of Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, 
and New York, the report of the Chief of Engineers on the Delaware 
River, published as House Document Numbered 522, 87th Congress, Second 
Session, as it relates to the Mid-Delaware River Basin from Wilmington 
to Port Jervis, and any other pertinent reports (including the strategy 
for resolution of interstate flow management issues in the Delaware 
River Basin dated August 2004 and the National Park Service Lower 
Delaware River Management Plan (1997-1999)), with a view to determining 
whether any modifications of recommendations contained in the first 
report referred to are advisable at the present time, in the interest 
of flood damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, and other related 
problems.

SEC. 4005. KNIK ARM, COOK INLET, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal expense, a study to 
determine the potential impacts on navigation of construction of a 
bridge across Knik Arm, Cook Inlet, Alaska.

SEC. 4006. KUSKOKWIM RIVER, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation, Kuskokwim River, Alaska, in the 
vicinity of the village of Crooked Creek.

SEC. 4007. ST. GEORGE HARBOR, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal expense, a study to 
determine the feasibility of providing navigation improvements at St. 
George Harbor, Alaska.

SEC. 4008. SUSITNA RIVER, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for hydropower, recreation, and related purposes 
on the Susitna River, Alaska.

SEC. 4009. GILA BEND, MARICOPA, ARIZONA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, 
Gila Bend, Maricopa, Arizona.
    (b) Review of Plans.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
review plans and designs developed by non-Federal interests and shall 
incorporate such plans and designs into the Federal study if the 
Secretary determines that such plans and designs are consistent with 
Federal standards.

SEC. 4010. SEARCY COUNTY, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
using Greers Ferry Lake as a water supply source for Searcy County, 
Arkansas.

SEC. 4011. ALISO CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for streambank protection and environmental 
restoration along Aliso Creek, California.

SEC. 4012. ELKHORN SLOUGH ESTUARY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the Elkhorn Slough estuary, 
California, to determine the feasibility of conserving, enhancing, and 
restoring estuarine habitats by developing strategies to address 
hydrological management issues.

SEC. 4013. FRESNO, KINGS, AND KERN COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Fresno, Kings, and Kern 
Counties, California.

SEC. 4014. LOS ANGELES RIVER REVITALIZATION STUDY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the city of 
Los Angeles, shall--
            (1) prepare a feasibility study for environmental 
        restoration, flood control, recreation, and other aspects of 
        Los Angeles River revitalization that is consistent with the 
        goals of the Los Angeles River Revitalization Master Plan 
        published by the city of Los Angeles; and
            (2) consider any locally-preferred project alternatives 
        developed through a full and open evaluation process for 
        inclusion in the study.
    (b) Use of Existing Information and Measures.--In preparing the 
study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall use, to the maximum 
extent practicable--
            (1) information obtained from the Los Angeles River 
        Revitalization Master Plan; and
            (2) the development process of that plan.
    (c) Demonstration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to construct 
        demonstration projects in order to provide information to 
        develop the study under subsection (a)(1).
            (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of any 
        project under this subsection shall be not more than 65 
        percent.
            (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $20,000,000.

SEC. 4015. LYTLE CREEK, RIALTO, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and groundwater 
recharge, Lytle Creek, Rialto, California.

SEC. 4016. MOKELUMNE RIVER, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply along the 
Mokelumne River, San Joaquin County, California.
    (b) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to invalidate, preempt, or create any exception to 
State water law, State water rights, or Federal or State permitted 
activities or agreements.

SEC. 4017. NAPA RIVER, ST. HELENA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study 
of the Napa River in the vicinity of St. Helena, California, for the 
purposes of improving flood management through reconnecting the river 
to its floodplain; restoring habitat, including riparian and aquatic 
habitat; improving fish passage and water quality; and restoring native 
plant communities.
    (b) Plans and Designs.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
shall review plans and designs developed by non-Federal interests and 
shall incorporate such plans and designs into the Federal study if the 
Secretary determines that such plans and designs are consistent with 
Federal standards.

SEC. 4018. ORICK, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction 
and ecosystem restoration, Orick, California.
    (b) Feasibility of Restoring or Rehabilitating Redwook Creek 
Levees.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall determine the 
feasibility of restoring or rehabilitating the Redwood Creek Levees, 
Humboldt County, California.

SEC. 4019. RIALTO, FONTANA, AND COLTON, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Rialto, Fontana, and 
Colton, California.

SEC. 4020. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study to determine the 
feasibility of, and alternatives for, measures to protect water 
diversion facilities and fish protective screen facilities in the 
vicinity of river mile 178 on the Sacramento River, California.

SEC. 4021. SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, San Diego County, California, 
including a review of the feasibility of connecting 4 existing 
reservoirs to increase usable storage capacity.

SEC. 4022. SAN FRANCISCO BAY, SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of the beneficial use of dredged material from the San 
Francisco Bay in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, 
including the benefits and impacts of salinity in the Delta and the 
benefits to navigation, flood damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, 
water quality, salinity control, water supply reliability, and 
recreation.
    (b) Cooperation.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
cooperate with the California Department of Water Resources and 
appropriate Federal and State entities in developing options for the 
beneficial use of dredged material from San Francisco Bay for the 
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta area.
    (c) Review.--The study shall include a review of the feasibility of 
using Sherman Island as a rehandling site for levee maintenance 
material, as well as for ecosystem restoration. The review may include 
monitoring a pilot project using up to 150,000 cubic yards of dredged 
material and being carried out at the Sherman Island site, examining 
larger scale use of dredged materials from the San Francisco Bay and 
Suisun Bay Channel, and analyzing the feasibility of the potential use 
of saline materials from the San Francisco Bay for both rehandling and 
ecosystem restoration purposes.

SEC. 4023. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY SHORELINE STUDY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--In conducting the South San Francisco Bay 
shoreline study, the Secretary shall--
            (1) review the planning, design, and land acquisition 
        documents prepared by the California State Coastal Conservancy, 
        the Santa Clara Valley Water District, and other local 
        interests in developing recommendations for measures to provide 
        flood protection of the South San Francisco Bay shoreline, 
        restoration of the South San Francisco Bay salt ponds 
        (including lands owned by the Department of the Interior), and 
        other related purposes; and
            (2) incorporate such planning, design, and land acquisition 
        documents into the Federal study if the Secretary determines 
        that such documents are consistent with Federal standards.
    (b) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2008, the Secretary shall 
transmit a feasibility report for the South San Francisco Bay shoreline 
study to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate.
    (c) Credit.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of any project authorized by law as a 
        result of the South San Francisco Bay shoreline study the cost 
        of work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date 
        of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
        determines that the work is integral to the project.
            (2) Limitation.--In no case may work that was carried out 
        more than 5 years before the date of enactment of this Act be 
        eligible for credit under this subsection.

SEC. 4024. TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Pinto Cove Wash, in 
the vicinity of Twentynine Palms, California.

SEC. 4025. YUCCA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, West Burnt Mountain 
basin, in the vicinity of Yucca Valley, California.

SEC. 4026. ROARING FORK RIVER, BASALT, COLORADO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and other purposes 
for the Roaring Fork River, Basalt, Colorado.

SEC. 4027. DELAWARE AND CHRISTINA RIVERS AND SHELLPOT CREEK, 
              WILMINGTON, DELAWARE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and related purposes 
along the Delaware and Christina Rivers and Shellpot Creek, Wilmington, 
Delaware.

SEC. 4028. COLLIER COUNTY BEACHES, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for hurricane and storm damage reduction and 
flood damage reduction in the vicinity of Vanderbilt, Park Shore, and 
Naples beaches, Collier County, Florida.

SEC. 4029. LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental protection and restoration, 
including improved water quality, and related purposes, Lower St. Johns 
River, Florida.

SEC. 4030. VANDERBILT BEACH LAGOON, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, water supply, and 
improvement of water quality at Vanderbilt Beach Lagoon, Florida.

SEC. 4031. MERIWETHER COUNTY, GEORGIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Meriwether County, Georgia.

SEC. 4032. TYBEE ISLAND, GEORGIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
including the northern end of Tybee Island extending from the north 
terminal groin to the mouth of Lazaretto Creek as a part of the project 
for beach erosion control, Tybee Island, Georgia, carried out under 
section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5).

SEC. 4033. BOISE RIVER, IDAHO.

    The study for flood control, Boise River, Idaho, authorized by 
section 414 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
324), is modified--
            (1) to add ecosystem restoration and water supply as 
        project purposes to be studied; and
            (2) to require the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the study the cost, not to exceed 
        $500,000, of work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
        before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if 
        the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
        project.

SEC. 4034. BALLARD'S ISLAND SIDE CHANNEL, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for ecosystem restoration, Ballard's Island, 
Illinois.

SEC. 4035. SALEM, INDIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project to provide an additional water supply source for 
Salem, Indiana.

SEC. 4036. BUCKHORN LAKE, KENTUCKY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of modifying the project for flood damage reduction, 
Buckhorn Lake, Kentucky, authorized by section 2 of the Flood Control 
Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), to add ecosystem restoration, 
recreation, and improved access as project purposes, including 
permanently raising the winter pool elevation of the project.
    (b) In-Kind Contributions.--The non-Federal interest may provide 
the non-Federal share of the cost of the study in the form of in-kind 
services and materials.

SEC. 4037. DEWEY LAKE, KENTUCKY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
modifying the project for Dewey Lake, Kentucky, to add water supply as 
a project purpose.

SEC. 4038. LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for flood 
control, Louisville, Kentucky, authorized by section 4 of the Flood 
Control Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), to investigate measures 
to address the rehabilitation of the project.

SEC. 4039. CLINTON RIVER, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, Clinton River, 
Michigan.

SEC. 4040. HAMBURG AND GREEN OAK TOWNSHIPS, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction on Ore Lake and the 
Huron River for Hamburg and Green Oak Townships, Michigan.

SEC. 4041. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study and prepare a 
report to evaluate the integrity of the bulkhead system located on and 
in the vicinity of Duluth-Superior Harbor, Duluth, Minnesota, and 
Superior, Wisconsin.
    (b) Contents.--The report shall include--
            (1) a determination of causes of corrosion of the bulkhead 
        system;
            (2) recommendations to reduce corrosion of the bulkhead 
        system;
            (3) a description of the necessary repairs to the bulkhead 
        system; and
            (4) an estimate of the cost of addressing the causes of the 
        corrosion and carrying out necessary repairs.

SEC. 4042. NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
modifying the project for navigation, Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, 
Alabama and Mississippi, to provide water supply for northeast 
Mississippi.

SEC. 4043. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, St. Louis, Missouri, 
to restore or rehabilitate the levee system feature of the project for 
flood protection, St. Louis, Missouri, authorized by the first section 
of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing construction of certain public 
works on the Mississippi River for the protection of Saint Louis, 
Missouri'', approved August 9, 1955 (69 Stat. 540).

SEC. 4044. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project in the vicinity of the Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway, New Jersey, for the construction of a dredged material 
disposal transfer facility to make dredged material available for 
beneficial reuse.

SEC. 4045. BAYONNE, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, including 
improved water quality, enhanced public access, and recreation, on the 
Kill Van Kull, Bayonne, New Jersey.

SEC. 4046. CARTERET, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, including 
improved water quality, enhanced public access, and recreation, on the 
Raritan River, Carteret, New Jersey.

SEC. 4047. GLOUCESTER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Gloucester County, 
New Jersey, including the feasibility of restoring the flood protection 
dikes in Gibbstown, New Jersey, and the associated tidegates in 
Gloucester County, New Jersey.

SEC. 4048. PERTH AMBOY, NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for riverfront development, including enhanced 
public access, recreation, and environmental restoration, on the Arthur 
Kill, Perth Amboy, New Jersey.

SEC. 4049. BATAVIA, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for hydropower and related purposes in the 
vicinity of Batavia, New York.

SEC. 4050. BIG SISTER CREEK, EVANS, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, 
Big Sister Creek, Evans, New York.
    (b) Evaluation of Potential Solutions.--In conducting the study, 
the Secretary shall evaluate potential solutions to flooding from all 
sources, including flooding that results from ice jams.

SEC. 4051. FINGER LAKES, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
protection, Finger Lakes, New York, to address water quality and 
aquatic nuisance species.

SEC. 4052. LAKE ERIE SHORELINE, BUFFALO, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for storm damage reduction and shoreline 
protection in the vicinity of Gallagher Beach, Lake Erie Shoreline, 
Buffalo, New York.

SEC. 4053. NEWTOWN CREEK, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out ecosystem restoration improvements on Newtown Creek, 
Brooklyn and Queens, New York.

SEC. 4054. NIAGARA RIVER, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for a low-head hydroelectric generating facility 
in the Niagara River, New York.

SEC. 4055. SHORE PARKWAY GREENWAY, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of carrying 
out a project for shoreline protection in the vicinity of the 
confluence of the Narrows and Gravesend Bay, Upper New York Bay, Shore 
Parkway Greenway, Brooklyn, New York.

SEC. 4056. UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, NEW YORK.

    Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-5b) and with the consent of the affected local government, 
a nonprofit organization may serve as the non-Federal interest for a 
study for the Upper Delaware River watershed, New York, being carried 
out under Committee Resolution 2495 of the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, adopted May 9, 
1996.

SEC. 4057. LINCOLN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of existing water and water 
quality-related infrastructure in Lincoln County, North Carolina, to 
assist local interests in determining the most efficient and effective 
way to connect county infrastructure.

SEC. 4058. WILKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Wilkes County, North Carolina.

SEC. 4059. YADKINVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Yadkinville, North Carolina.

SEC. 4060. LAKE ERIE, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for power generation at confined disposal 
facilities along Lake Erie, Ohio.

SEC. 4061. OHIO RIVER, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction on the Ohio River in 
Mahoning, Columbiana, Jefferson, Belmont, Noble, Monroe, Washington, 
Athens, Meigs, Gallia, Lawrence, and Scioto Counties, Ohio.

SEC. 4062. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AND FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENTS, OREGON.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking ecosystem restoration and fish passage 
improvements on rivers throughout the State of Oregon.
    (b) Requirements.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall--
            (1) work in coordination with the State of Oregon, local 
        governments, and other Federal agencies; and
            (2) place emphasis on--
                    (A) fish passage and conservation and restoration 
                strategies to benefit species that are listed or 
                proposed for listing as threatened or endangered 
                species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 
                U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
                    (B) other watershed restoration objectives.
    (c) Pilot Program.--
            (1) In general.--In conjunction with conducting the study 
        under subsection (a), the Secretary may carry out pilot 
        projects to demonstrate the effectiveness of ecosystem 
        restoration and fish passages.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this subsection.

SEC. 4063. WALLA WALLA RIVER BASIN, OREGON.

    In conducting the study of determine the feasibility of carrying 
out a project for ecosystem restoration, Walla Walla River Basin, 
Oregon, the Secretary shall--
            (1) credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
        study the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
        before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if 
        the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
        project; and
            (2) allow the non-Federal interest to provide the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the study in the form of in-kind 
        services and materials.

SEC. 4064. CHARTIERS CREEK WATERSHED, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Chartiers Creek 
watershed, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 4065. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for flood 
control, Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Warren, Pennsylvania, 
authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (49 
Stat. 1570), and modified by section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 
28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1215), section 2 of the Flood Control Act of August 
18, 1941 (55 Stat. 646), and section 4 of the Flood Control Act of 
December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887), to review operations of and identify 
modifications to the project to expand recreational opportunities.

SEC. 4066. WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of structural 
and nonstructural flood damage reduction, stream bank protection, storm 
water management, channel clearing and modification, and watershed 
coordination measures in the Mahoning River basin, Pennsylvania, the 
Allegheny River basin, Pennsylvania, and the Upper Ohio River basin, 
Pennsylvania, to provide a level of flood protection sufficient to 
prevent future losses to communities located in such basins from 
flooding such as occurred in September 2004, but not less than a 100-
year level of flood protection.
    (b) Priority Communities.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall give priority to the following Pennsylvania 
communities: Marshall Township, Ross Township, Shaler Township, Jackson 
Township, Harmony, Zelienople, Darlington Township, Houston Borough, 
Chartiers Township, Washington, Canton Township, Tarentum Borough, and 
East Deer Township.

SEC. 4067. WILLIAMSPORT, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for flood 
control, Williamsport, Pennsylvania, authorized by section 5 of the 
Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570), to investigate 
measures to rehabilitate the project.

SEC. 4068. YARDLEY BOROUGH, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, at Yardley Borough, 
Pennsylvania, including the alternative of raising River Road.

SEC. 4069. RIO VALENCIANO, JUNCOS, PUERTO RICO.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to reevaluate 
the project for flood damage reduction and water supply, Rio 
Valenciano, Juncos, Puerto Rico, authorized by section 209 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1197) and section 204 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1828), to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out the project.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the study the cost of work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.

SEC. 4070. CROOKED CREEK, BENNETTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, 
South Carolina.

SEC. 4071. BROAD RIVER, YORK COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Broad River, York County, 
South Carolina.

SEC. 4072. CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Chattanooga Creek, 
Dobbs Branch, Chattanooga, Tennessee.

SEC. 4073. CLEVELAND, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Cleveland, 
Tennessee.

SEC. 4074. CUMBERLAND RIVER, NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for recreation on, riverbank protection for, and 
environmental protection of, the Cumberland River and riparian habitats 
in the city of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee.

SEC. 4075. LEWIS, LAWRENCE, AND WAYNE COUNTIES, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne 
Counties, Tennessee.

SEC. 4076. WOLF RIVER AND NONCONNAH CREEK, MEMPHIS TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction along Wolf River and 
Nonconnah Creek, in the vicinity of Memphis, Tennessee, to include the 
repair, replacement, rehabilitation, and restoration of the following 
pumping stations: Cypress Creek, Nonconnah Creek, Ensley, Marble Bayou, 
and Bayou Gayoso.

SEC. 4077. ABILENE, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Abilene, Texas.

SEC. 4078. COASTAL TEXAS ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION AND RESTORATION, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall develop a comprehensive plan 
to determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage 
reduction, hurricane and storm damage reduction, and ecosystem 
restoration in the coastal areas of the State of Texas.
    (b) Scope.--The comprehensive plan shall provide for the 
protection, conservation, and restoration of wetlands, barrier islands, 
shorelines, and related lands and features that protect critical 
resources, habitat, and infrastructure from the impacts of coastal 
storms, hurricanes, erosion, and subsidence.
    (c) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term ``coastal 
areas in the State of Texas'' means the coastal areas of the State of 
Texas from the Sabine River on the east to the Rio Grande River on the 
west and includes tidal waters, barrier islands, marshes, coastal 
wetlands, rivers and streams, and adjacent areas.

SEC. 4079. PORT OF GALVESTON, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of carrying 
out a project for dredged material disposal in the vicinity of the 
project for navigation and environmental restoration, Houston-Galveston 
Navigation Channels, Texas, authorized by section 101(a)(30) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3666).

SEC. 4080. GRAND COUNTY AND MOAB, UTAH.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Grand County and the city 
of Moab, Utah, including a review of the impact of current and future 
demands on the Spanish Valley Aquifer.

SEC. 4081. SOUTHWESTERN UTAH.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Santa Clara River, 
Washington, Iron, and Kane Counties, Utah.

SEC. 4082. CHOWAN RIVER BASIN, VIRGINIA AND NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, environmental 
restoration, navigation, and erosion control, Chowan River basin, 
Virginia and North Carolina.

SEC. 4083. ELLIOTT BAY SEAWALL, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The study for rehabilitation of the Elliott Bay 
Seawall, Seattle, Washington, being carried out under Committee 
Resolution 2704 of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
of the House of Representatives adopted September 25, 2002, is modified 
to include a determination of the feasibility of reducing future damage 
to the seawall from seismic activity.
    (b) Acceptance of Contributions.--In carrying out the study, the 
Secretary may accept contributions in excess of the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the study from the non-Federal interest to the extent 
that the Secretary determines that the contributions will facilitate 
completion of the study.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of any project authorized by law as a result of the 
study the value of contributions accepted by the Secretary under 
subsection (b).

SEC. 4084. MONONGAHELA RIVER BASIN, NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out aquatic ecosystem restoration and protection projects in 
the watersheds of the Monongahela River Basin lying within the counties 
of Hancock, Ohio, Marshall, Wetzel, Tyler, Pleasants, Wood, Doddridge, 
Monongalia, Marion, Harrison, Taylor, Barbour, Preston, Tucker, 
Mineral, Grant, Gilmer, Brooke, and Rithchie, West Virginia, 
particularly as related to abandoned mine drainage abatement.

SEC. 4085. KENOSHA HARBOR, WISCONSIN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation, Kenosha Harbor, Wisconsin, 
including the extension of existing piers.

SEC. 4086. WAUWATOSA, WISCONSIN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and environmental 
restoration, Menomonee River and Underwood Creek, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 
and greater Milwaukee watersheds, Wisconsin.

SEC. 4087. JOHNSONVILLE DAM, JOHNSONVILLE, WISCONSIN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the Johnsonville Dam, 
Johnsonville, Wisconsin, to determine if the structure prevents ice 
jams on the Sheboygan River.

                         TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS

SEC. 5001. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.

    (a) In General.--Upon request of a non-Federal interest, the 
Secretary shall be responsible for maintenance of the following 
navigation channels and breakwaters constructed or improved by the non-
Federal interest if the Secretary determines that such maintenance is 
economically justified and environmentally acceptable and that the 
channel or breakwater was constructed in accordance with applicable 
permits and appropriate engineering and design standards:
            (1) Manatee Harbor basin, Florida.
            (2) West turning basin, Canaveral Harbor, Florida.
            (3) Bayou LaFourche Channel, Port Fourchon, Louisiana.
            (4) Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, Louisiana.
            (5) Pidgeon Industrial Harbor, Pidgeon Industrial Park, 
        Memphis Harbor, Tennessee.
            (6) Pix Bayou Navigation Channel, Chambers County, Texas.
            (7) Racine Harbor, Wisconsin.
    (b) Completion of Assessment.--Not later than 6 months after the 
date of receipt of a request from a non-Federal interest for Federal 
assumption of maintenance of a channel listed in subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall make a determination as provided in subsection (a) and 
advise the non-Federal interest of the Secretary's determination.

SEC. 5002. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical, planning, and 
design assistance to non-Federal interests for carrying out watershed 
management, restoration, and development projects at the locations 
described in subsection (d).
    (b) Specific Measures.--Assistance provided under subsection (a) 
may be in support of non-Federal projects for the following purposes:
            (1) Management and restoration of water quality.
            (2) Control and remediation of toxic sediments.
            (3) Restoration of degraded streams, rivers, wetlands, and 
        other waterbodies to their natural condition as a means to 
        control flooding, excessive erosion, and sedimentation.
            (4) Protection and restoration of watersheds, including 
        urban watersheds.
            (5) Demonstration of technologies for nonstructural 
        measures to reduce destructive impacts of flooding.
    (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
assistance provided under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
    (d) Project Locations.--The locations referred to in subsection (a) 
are the following:
            (1) Charlotte Harbor watershed, Florida.
            (2) Big Creek watershed, Roswell, Georgia.
            (3) Those portions of the watersheds of the Chattahoochee, 
        Etowah, Flint, Ocmulgee, and Oconee Rivers lying within the 
        counties of Bartow, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, 
        Douglas, Fayette, Fulton, Forsyth, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, 
        Paulding, Rockdale, and Walton, Georgia.
            (4) Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois.
            (5) Amite River basin, Louisiana.
            (6) East Atchafalaya River basin, Iberville Parish and 
        Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana.
            (7) Red River watershed, Louisiana.
            (8) Lower Platte River watershed, Nebraska.
            (9) Rio Grande watershed, New Mexico.
            (10) Taunton River basin, Massachusetts.
            (11) Marlboro Township, New Jersey.
            (12) Esopus, Plattekill, and Rondout Creeks, Greene, 
        Sullivan, and Ulster Counties, New York.
            (13) Greenwood Lake watershed, New York and New Jersey.
            (14) Long Island Sound watershed, New York.
            (15) Tuscarawas River basin, Ohio.
            (16) Ramapo River watershed, New York.
            (17) Western Lake Erie basin, Ohio.
            (18) Those portions of the watersheds of the Beaver, Upper 
        Ohio, Connoquenessing, Lower Allegheny, Kiskiminetas, Lower 
        Monongahela, Youghiogheny, Shenango, and Mahoning Rivers lying 
        within the counties of Beaver, Butler, Lawrence, and Mercer, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (19) Otter Creek watershed, Pennsylvania.
            (20) Unami Creek watershed, Milford Township, Pennsylvania.
            (21) Sauk River basin, Washington.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000.

SEC. 5003. DAM SAFETY.

    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide assistance to enhance 
dam safety at the following locations:
            (1) Fish Creek Dam, Blaine County, Idaho.
            (2) Hamilton Dam, Flint River, Flint, Michigan.
            (3) State Dam, Auburn, New York.
            (4) Whaley Lake Dam, Pawling, New York.
            (5) Ingham Spring Dam, Solebury Township, Pennsylvania.
            (6) Leaser Lake Dam, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
            (7) Stillwater Dam, Monroe County, Pennsylvania.
            (8) Wissahickon Creek Dam, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.
    (b) Special Rule.--The assistance provided under subsection (a) for 
State Dam, Auburn, New York, shall be for a project for rehabilitation 
in accordance with the report on State Dam Rehabilitation, Owasco Lake 
Outlet, New York, dated March 1999, if the Secretary determines that 
the project is feasible.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out subsection (a) $6,000,000.

SEC. 5004. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EVALUATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Upon request of a non-Federal interest, the 
Secretary shall evaluate the structural integrity and effectiveness of 
a project for flood damage reduction and, if the Secretary determines 
that the project does not meet such minimum standards as the Secretary 
may establish and, absent action by the Secretary, the project will 
fail, the Secretary may take such action as may be necessary to restore 
the integrity and effectiveness of the project.
    (b) Priority.--The Secretary shall evaluate under subsection (a) 
the following projects:
            (1) Project for flood damage reduction, Arkansas River 
        Levees, Arkansas.
            (2) Project for flood damage reduction, Nonconnah Creek, 
        Tennessee.

SEC. 5005. FLOOD MITIGATION PRIORITY AREAS.

    (a) In General.--Section 212(e) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (33 U.S.C. 2332(e); 114 Stat. 2599) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraphs (23) and 
        (27);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (28) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(29) Ascension Parish, Louisiana;
            ``(30) East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana;
            ``(31) Iberville Parish, Louisiana;
            ``(32) Livingston Parish, Louisiana; and
            ``(33) Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 212(i)(1) of such Act 
(33 U.S.C. 2332(i)(1)) is amended by striking ``section--'' and all 
that follows before the period at the end and inserting ``section 
$20,000,000''.

SEC. 5006. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR AUTHORIZED PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 219(e) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (7);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (8) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) $35,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(18);
            ``(10) $27,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(19);
            ``(11) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(20);
            ``(12) $35,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(23);
            ``(13) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(25);
            ``(14) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(26);
            ``(15) $35,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(27);
            ``(16) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(28); and
            ``(17) $30,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(40).''.
    (b) East Arkansas Enterprise Community, Arkansas.--Federal 
assistance made available under the rural enterprise zone program of 
the Department of Agriculture may be used toward payment of the non-
Federal share of the costs of the project described in section 
219(c)(20) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 
2763A-219) if such assistance is authorized to be used for such 
purposes.

SEC. 5007. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR CERTAIN 
              PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall expedite completion of the reports and, if the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible, shall expedite 
completion of construction for the following projects:
            (1) Daytona Beach shore protection project, Florida.
            (2) Flagler Beach shore protection project, Florida.
            (3) St. Johns County shore protection project, Florida.
            (4) False River, Louisiana, being carried out under section 
        206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 
        2330).
            (5) Fulmer Creek, Village of Mohawk, New York, being 
        carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
        (33 U.S.C. 701s).
            (6) Moyer Creek, Village of Frankfort, New York, being 
        carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
        (33 U.S.C. 701s).
            (7) Steele Creek, Village of Ilion, New York, being carried 
        out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 
        U.S.C. 701s).
            (8) Oriskany Wildlife Management Area, Rome, New York, 
        being carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
            (9) Whitney Point Lake, Otselic River, Whitney Point, New 
        York, being carried out under section 1135 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a).
            (10) North River, Peabody, Massachusetts, being carried out 
        under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
        701s).
            (11) Chenango Lake, Chenango County, New York, being 
        carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).

SEC. 5008. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall expedite completion of the 
reports for the following projects and, if the Secretary determines 
that a project is justified in the completed report, proceed directly 
to project preconstruction, engineering, and design:
            (1) Project for water supply, Little Red River, Arkansas.
            (2) Project for shoreline stabilization at Egmont Key, 
        Florida.
            (3) Project for ecosystem restoration, University Lake, 
        Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
            (4) Project for navigation, Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas 
        and Louisiana.
    (b) Special Rule for Egmont Key, Florida.--In carrying out the 
project for shoreline stabilization at Egmont Key, Florida, referred to 
in subsection (a)(3), the Secretary shall waive any cost share to be 
provided by non-Federal interests for any portion of the project that 
benefits federally owned property.

SEC. 5009. SOUTHEASTERN WATER RESOURCES ASSESSMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal expense, 
an assessment of the water resources needs of the river basins and 
watersheds of the southeastern United States.
    (b) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out the assessment, the 
Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements with State and local 
agencies, non-Federal and nonprofit entities, and regional researchers.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $7,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5010. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

    Section 1103(e)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 652(e)(7)) is amended--
            (1) by adding at the end of subparagraph (A) the following: 
        ``The non-Federal interest may provide the non-Federal share of 
        the cost of the project in the form of in-kind services and 
        materials.''; and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following:
    ``(C) Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a non-Federal interest may include for any 
project undertaken under this section, a nonprofit entity with the 
consent of the affected local government.''.

SEC. 5011. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENHANCEMENT PROJECT.

    Section 514(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 343; 117 Stat. 142) is amended by striking ``and 2004'' and 
inserting ``through 2015''.

SEC. 5012. GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    Section 506(f)(3)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d-22; 114 Stat. 2646) is amended by striking ``50 
percent'' and inserting ``100 percent''.

SEC. 5013. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS AND SEDIMENT REMEDIATION.

    Section 401(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 
Stat. 4644; 33 U.S.C. 1268 note) is amended by striking ``through 
2006'' and inserting ``through 2012''.

SEC. 5014. GREAT LAKES TRIBUTARY MODELS.

    Section 516(g)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(33 U.S.C. 2326b(g)(2)) is amended by striking ``through 2006'' and 
inserting ``through 2012''.

SEC. 5015. GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION.

    (a) In General.--Using available funds, the Secretary shall 
expedite the operation and maintenance, including dredging, of the 
navigation features of the Great Lakes and Connecting Channels for the 
purpose of supporting commercial navigation to authorized project 
depths.
    (b) Great Lakes and Connecting Channels Defined.--In this section, 
the term ``Great Lakes and Connecting Channels'' includes Lakes 
Superior, Huron, Michigan, Erie, and Ontario, all connecting waters 
between and among such lakes used for commercial navigation, any 
navigation features in such lakes or waters that are a Federal 
operation or maintenance responsibility, and areas of the Saint 
Lawrence River that are operated or maintained by the Federal 
government for commercial navigation.

SEC. 5016. GREAT LAKES PILOT PROJECT.

    Using available funds, the Secretary, in coordination with the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Commandant of 
the Coast Guard, the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service, and the Director of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection 
Service, shall carry out a pilot project, on an emergency basis, to 
control and prevent further spreading of viral hemorrhagic septicemia 
in the Great Lakes and their connecting channels.

SEC. 5017. SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized, using amounts 
contributed by the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation under 
subsection (b), to carry out projects for operations, maintenance, 
repair, and rehabilitation, including associated maintenance dredging, 
of the Eisenhower and Snell lock facilities and related navigational 
infrastructure for the Saint Lawrence Seaway, at a total cost of 
$134,650,000.
    (b) Source of Funds.--The Secretary is authorized to accept funds 
from the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation to carry out 
projects under this section. Such funds may include amounts made 
available to the Corporation from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund and 
the general fund of the Treasury of the United States pursuant to 
section 210 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2238).

SEC. 5018. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER DISPERSAL BARRIER PROJECT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with appropriate 
Federal and State agencies, shall study, design, and carry out a 
project for preventing and reducing the dispersal of aquatic nuisance 
species through the Upper Mississippi River system. The Secretary shall 
complete the study, design, and construction of the project not later 
than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act.
    (b) Dispersal Barrier.--The Secretary, at Federal expense, shall--
            (1) investigate and identify environmentally sound methods 
        for preventing and reducing the dispersal of aquatic nuisance 
        species;
            (2) study, design, and carry out a project for a dispersal 
        barrier, using available technologies and measures, to be 
        located in the lock portion of Lock and Dam 11 in the Upper 
        Mississippi River basin;
            (3) monitor and evaluate, in cooperation with the Director 
        of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the 
        effectiveness of the project in preventing and reducing the 
        dispersal of aquatic nuisance species through the Upper 
        Mississippi River system, and report to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate on the results of the evaluation; and
            (4) operate and maintain the project.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $4,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5019. SUSQUEHANNA, DELAWARE, AND POTOMAC RIVER BASINS, DELAWARE, 
              MARYLAND, PENNSYLVANIA, AND VIRGINIA.

    (a) Ex Officio Member.--Notwithstanding section 3001(a) of the 1997 
Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery From Natural 
Disasters, and for Overseas Peacekeeping Efforts, Including Those in 
Bosnia (Public Law 105-18; 111 Stat. 176), section 2.2 of the 
Susquehanna River Basin Compact (Public Law 91-575), and section 2.2 of 
the Delaware River Basin Compact (Public Law 87-328), beginning in 
fiscal year 2002, and each fiscal year thereafter, the Division 
Engineer, North Atlantic Division, Corps of Engineers--
            (1) shall be the ex officio United States member under the 
        Susquehanna River Basin Compact, the Delaware River Basin 
        Compact, and the Potomac River Basin Compact;
            (2) shall serve without additional compensation; and
            (3) may designate an alternate member in accordance with 
        the terms of those compacts.
    (b) Authorization To Allocate.--The Secretary shall allocate funds 
to the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, Delaware River Basin 
Commission, and the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 
(Potomac River Basin Compact (Public Law 91-407)) to fulfill the 
equitable funding requirements of the respective interstate compacts.
    (c) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Delaware River Basin.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an 
        agreement with the Delaware River Basin Commission to provide 
        temporary water supply and conservation storage at the Francis 
        E. Walter Dam, Pennsylvania, for any period during which the 
        Commission has determined that a drought warning or drought 
        emergency exists.
            (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that the cost 
        for water supply and conservation storage under paragraph (1) 
        shall not exceed the incremental operating costs associated 
        with providing the storage.
    (d) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Susquehanna River 
Basin.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an 
        agreement with the Susquehanna River Basin Commission to 
        provide temporary water supply and conservation storage at 
        Federal facilities operated by the Corps of Engineers in the 
        Susquehanna River Basin for any period for which the Commission 
        has determined that a drought warning or drought emergency 
        exists.
            (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that the cost 
        for water supply and conservation storage under paragraph (1) 
        shall not exceed the incremental operating costs associated 
        with providing the storage.
    (e) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Potomac River Basin.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an 
        agreement with the Potomac River Basin Commission to provide 
        temporary water supply and conservation storage at Federal 
        facilities operated by the Corps of Engineers in the Potomac 
        River Basin for any period for which the Commission has 
        determined that a drought warning or drought emergency exists.
            (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that the cost 
        for water supply and conservation storage under paragraph (1) 
        shall not exceed the incremental operating costs associated 
        with providing the storage.

SEC. 5020. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) Form of Assistance.--Section 510(a)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3759) is amended by striking ``, and 
beneficial uses of dredged material'' and inserting ``, beneficial uses 
of dredged material, and restoration of submerged aquatic vegetation''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 510(i) of such Act 
(110 Stat. 3761) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting 
``$50,000,000''.

SEC. 5021. HYPOXIA ASSESSMENT.

    The Secretary may participate with Federal, State, and local 
agencies, non-Federal and nonprofit entities, regional researchers, and 
other interested parties to assess hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico.

SEC. 5022. POTOMAC RIVER WATERSHED ASSESSMENT AND TRIBUTARY STRATEGY 
              EVALUATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM.

    The Secretary may participate in the Potomac River Watershed 
Assessment and Tributary Strategy Evaluation and Monitoring Program to 
identify a series of resource management indicators to accurately 
monitor the effectiveness of the implementation of the agreed upon 
tributary strategies and other public policies that pertain to natural 
resource protection of the Potomac River watershed.

SEC. 5023. LOCK AND DAM SECURITY.

    (a) Standards.--The Secretary, in consultation with the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and the 
Coast Guard, shall develop standards for the security of locks and 
dams, including the testing and certification of vessel exclusion 
barriers.
    (b) Site Surveys.--At the request of a lock or dam owner, the 
Secretary shall provide technical assistance, on a reimbursable basis, 
to improve lock or dam security.
    (c) Cooperative Agreement.--The Secretary may enter into a 
cooperative agreement with a nonprofit alliance of public and private 
organizations that has the mission of promoting safe waterways and 
seaports to carry out testing and certification activities, and to 
perform site surveys, under this section.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $3,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5024. REHABILITATION.

    The Secretary, at Federal expense and not to exceed $1,000,000, 
shall rehabilitate and improve the water-related infrastructure and the 
transportation infrastructure for the historic property in the 
Anacostia River Watershed located in the District of Columbia, 
including measures to address wet weather conditions. To carry out this 
section, the Secretary shall accept funds provided for such project 
under any other Federal program.

SEC. 5025. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR COLUMBIA AND SNAKE 
              RIVER SALMON SURVIVAL.

    Section 511 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (16 
U.S.C. 3301 note; 110 Stat. 3761; 113 Stat. 375) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(6) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$25,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(2) by striking ``$1,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$10,000,000''.

SEC. 5026. AUBURN, ALABAMA.

    The Secretary may provide technical assistance relating to water 
supply to the city of Auburn, Alabama. There is authorized to be 
appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5027. PINHOOK CREEK, HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA.

    (a) Project Authorization.--The Secretary shall design and 
construct the locally preferred plan for flood protection at Pinhook 
Creek, Huntsville, Alabama. In carrying out the project, the Secretary 
shall utilize, to the extent practicable, the existing detailed project 
report for the project prepared under the authority of section 205 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
    (b) Participation by Non-Federal Interest.--The Secretary shall 
allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of the 
project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that the 
Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
necessary to implement the project.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the 
non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for 
the project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to 
the project.

SEC. 5028. ALASKA.

    Section 570 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 369) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c) by inserting ``environmental 
        restoration,'' after ``water supply and related facilities,'';
            (2) in subsection (e)(3)(B) by striking the last sentence;
            (3) in subsection (h) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$45,000,000''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), a non-Federal 
interest may include for any project undertaken under this section a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    ``(j) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section at 
Federal expense.''.

SEC. 5029. BARROW, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall carry out, under section 117 of the Energy and 
Water Development Appropriations Act, 2005 (118 Stat. 2944), a 
nonstructural project for coastal erosion and storm damage prevention 
and reduction at Barrow, Alaska, including relocation of 
infrastructure.

SEC. 5030. COFFMAN COVE, ALASKA.

    The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project for navigation, 
Coffman Cove, Alaska, at a total cost of $3,000,000.

SEC. 5031. FIRE ISLAND, ALASKA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to provide planning, 
design, and construction assistance to the non-Federal interest for the 
construction of a barge landing facility on Fire Island, Alaska.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5032. FORT YUKON, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall make repairs to the dike at Fort Yukon, Alaska, 
so that the dike meets Corps of Engineers standards.

SEC. 5033. KOTZEBUE HARBOR, ALASKA.

    The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project for navigation, 
Kotzebue Harbor, Kotzebue, Alaska, at total cost of $2,200,000.

SEC. 5034. LOWELL CREEK TUNNEL, SEWARD, ALASKA.

    (a) Long-Term Maintenance and Repair.--The Secretary shall assume 
responsibility for the long-term maintenance and repair of the Lowell 
Creek Tunnel.
    (b) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
whether alternative methods of flood diversion in Lowell Canyon are 
feasible.

SEC. 5035. ST. HERMAN AND ST. PAUL HARBORS, KODIAK, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency basis, necessary 
removal of rubble, sediment, and rock impeding the entrance to the St. 
Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, Alaska, at a Federal cost of 
$2,000,000.

SEC. 5036. TANANA RIVER, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency basis, the removal 
of the hazard to navigation on the Tanana River, Alaska, near the mouth 
of the Chena River, as described in the January 3, 2005, memorandum 
from the Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard District, to the Corps of 
Engineers, Alaska District, Anchorage, Alaska.

SEC. 5037. VALDEZ, ALASKA.

    The Secretary is authorized to construct a small boat harbor in 
Valdez, Alaska, at a total cost of $20,000,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $10,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$9,500,000.

SEC. 5038. WHITTIER, ALASKA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal expense, a 
study to determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for 
navigation at Whittier, Alaska, to construct a new boat harbor at the 
head of Whittier Bay and to expand the existing harbor and, if the 
Secretary determines that a project is feasible, the Secretary may 
carry out the project.
    (b) Non-Federal Cost Share.--The non-Federal interest for the 
project may use, and the Secretary shall accept, funds provided by a 
Federal agency under any other Federal program, to satisfy, in whole or 
in part, the non-Federal share of the cost of the project if such funds 
are authorized to be used to carry out the project.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $35,200,000.

SEC. 5039. WRANGELL HARBOR, ALASKA.

    (a) General Navigation Features.--In carrying out the project for 
navigation, Wrangell Harbor, Alaska, authorized by section 101(b)(1) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), the 
Secretary shall consider the dredging of the mooring basin and 
construction of the inner harbor facilities to be general navigation 
features for purposes of estimating the non-Federal share of project 
costs.
    (b) Revision of Partnership Agreement.--The Secretary shall revise 
the partnership agreement for the project to reflect the change 
required by subsection (a).

SEC. 5040. AUGUSTA AND CLARENDON, ARKANSAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to perform operation, 
maintenance, and rehabilitation of authorized and completed levees on 
the White River between Augusta and Clarendon, Arkansas.
    (b) Reimbursement.--After performing the operation, maintenance, 
and rehabilitation under subsection (a), the Secretary shall seek 
reimbursement from the Secretary of the Interior of an amount equal to 
the costs allocated to benefits to a Federal wildlife refuge of such 
operation, maintenance, and rehabilitation.

SEC. 5041. DES ARC LEVEE PROTECTION, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall review the project for flood control, Des Arc, 
Arkansas, to determine whether bank and channel scour along the White 
River threaten the existing project and whether the scour is as a 
result of a design deficiency. If the Secretary determines that such 
conditions exist as a result of a deficiency, the Secretary shall carry 
out measures to eliminate the deficiency.

SEC. 5042. LOOMIS LANDING, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of shore damage in the vicinity 
of Loomis Landing, Arkansas, to determine if the damage is the result 
of a Federal navigation project, and, if the Secretary determines that 
the damage is the result of a Federal navigation project, the Secretary 
shall carry out a project to mitigate the damage under section 111 of 
the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i).

SEC. 5043. ST. FRANCIS RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of increased siltation and 
streambank erosion in the St. Francis River Basin, Arkansas and 
Missouri, to determine if the siltation or erosion, or both, are the 
result of a Federal flood control project and, if the Secretary 
determines that the siltation or erosion, or both, are the result of a 
Federal flood control project, the Secretary shall carry out a project 
to mitigate the siltation or erosion, or both.

SEC. 5044. CAMBRIA, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(f)(48) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$10,300,000'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$10,300,000'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward 
                the non-Federal share of the cost of the project not to 
                exceed $3,000,000 for the cost of planning and design 
                work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the 
                date of the partnership agreement for the project if 
                the Secretary determines that the work is integral to 
                the project.''; and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
        (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
        subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).

SEC. 5045. CONTRA COSTA CANAL, OAKLEY AND KNIGHTSEN, CALIFORNIA; 
              MALLARD SLOUGH, PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA.

    Sections 512 and 514 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2650) are each amended by adding at the end the following: 
``All planning, study, design, and construction on the project shall be 
carried out by the office of the district engineer, San Francisco, 
California.''.

SEC. 5046. DANA POINT HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the causes of water quality 
degradation within Dana Point Harbor, California, to determine if the 
degradation is the result of a Federal navigation project, and, if the 
Secretary determines that the degradation is the result of a Federal 
navigation project, the Secretary shall carry out a project to mitigate 
the degradation at Federal expense.

SEC. 5047. EAST SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(f)(22) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 336) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$25,000,000'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward 
                the non-Federal share of the cost of the project (i) 
                the cost of design and construction work carried out by 
                the non-Federal interest before, on, or after the date 
                of the partnership agreement for the project if the 
                Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
                project; and (ii) the cost of provided for the project 
                by the non-Federal interest.
                    ``(C) In-kind contributions.--The non-Federal 
                interest may provide any portion of the non-Federal 
                share of the cost of the project in the form of in-kind 
                services and materials.''; and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
        (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
        subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).

SEC. 5048. EASTERN SANTA CLARA BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 111(c) of the Miscellaneous Appropriations Act, 2001 (as 
enacted into law by Public Law 106-554; 114 Stat. 2763A-224) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$28,000,000''; and
            (2) by striking ``$7,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$10,000,000''.

SEC. 5049. LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(f)(50) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended--
            (1) by inserting after ``water'' the following: ``and 
        wastewater''; and
            (2) by striking ``$14,500,000'' and inserting 
        ``$24,500,000''.

SEC. 5050. LOS OSOS, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 219(c)(27) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4835; 114 Stat. 2763A-219) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(27) Los osos, california.--Wastewater infrastructure, 
        Los Osos, California.''.

SEC. 5051. PINE FLAT DAM AND RESERVOIR, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall review the Kings River 
Fisheries Management Program Framework Agreement, dated May 29, 1999, 
among the California Department of Fish and Game, the Kings River Water 
Association, and the Kings River Conservation District and, if the 
Secretary determines that the management program is feasible, the 
Secretary may participate in the management program.
    (b) Prohibition.--Nothing in this section authorizes any project 
for the raising of, or the construction of, a multilevel intake 
structure at Pine Flat Dam, California.
    (c) Use of Existing Studies.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall use, to the maximum extent practicable, studies in 
existence on the date of enactment of this Act, including data and 
environmental documentation in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
Pine Flat Dam and Reservoir, Fresno County, California, dated July 19, 
2002.
    (d) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the cost of planning, design, and 
construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to $20,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5052. RAYMOND BASIN, SIX BASINS, CHINO BASIN, AND SAN GABRIEL 
              BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Comprehensive Plan.--The Secretary, in consultation and 
coordination with appropriate Federal, State, and local entities, shall 
develop a comprehensive plan for the management of water resources in 
the Raymond Basin, Six Basins, Chino Basin, and San Gabriel Basin, 
California. The Secretary may carry out activities identified in the 
comprehensive plan to demonstrate practicable alternatives for water 
resources management.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--
            (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
        activities carried out under this section shall be 35 percent.
            (2) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of activities carried out under this 
        section the cost of planning, design, and construction work 
        completed by or on behalf of the non-Federal interests for 
        implementation of measures under this section. The amount of 
        such credit shall not exceed the non-Federal share of the cost 
        of such activities.
            (3) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        the cost of operation and maintenance of any measures 
        constructed under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.

SEC. 5053. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the Port of San 
Francisco, California, may carry out the project for repair and 
removal, as appropriate, of Piers 30-32, 35, 36, 70 (including Wharves 
7 and 8), and 80 in San Francisco, California, substantially in 
accordance with the Port's redevelopment plan.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriation.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this subsection.

SEC. 5054. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, WATERFRONT AREA.

    (a) Area to Be Declared Nonnavigable; Public Interest.--Unless the 
Secretary finds, after consultation with local and regional public 
officials (including local and regional public planning organizations), 
that the proposed projects to be undertaken within the boundaries of 
the portion of the San Francisco, California, waterfront area described 
in subsection (b) are not in the public interest, such portion is 
declared to be nonnavigable waters of the United States.
    (b) Northern Embarcadero South of Bryant Street.--The portion of 
the San Francisco, California, waterfront area referred to in 
subsection (a) is as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the 
northeasterly prolongation of that portion of the northwesterly line of 
Bryant Street lying between Beale Street and Main Street with the 
southwesterly line of Spear Street, which intersection lies on the line 
of jurisdiction of the San Francisco Port Commission; following thence 
southerly along said line of jurisdiction as described in the State of 
California Harbor and Navigation Code Section 1770, as amended in 1961, 
to its intersection with the easterly line of Townsend Street along a 
line that is parallel and distant 10 feet southerly from the existing 
southern boundary of Pier 40 produced to its point of intersection with 
the United States Government pier-head line; thence northerly along 
said pier-head line to its intersection with a line parallel with, and 
distant 10 feet easterly from, the existing easterly boundary line of 
Pier 30-32; thence northerly along said parallel line and its northerly 
prolongation, to a point of intersection with a line parallel with, and 
distant 10 feet northerly from, the existing northerly boundary of Pier 
30-32, thence westerly along last said parallel line to its 
intersection with the United States Government pier-head line; to the 
northwesterly line of Bryant Street produced northwesterly; thence 
southwesterly along said northwesterly line of Bryant Street produced 
to the point of beginning.
    (c) Requirement That Area Be Improved.--The declaration of 
nonnavigability under subsection (a) applies only to those parts of the 
area described in subsection (b) that are or will be bulkheaded, 
filled, or otherwise occupied by permanent structures and does not 
affect the applicability of any Federal statute or regulation 
applicable to such parts the day before the date of enactment of this 
Act, including sections 9 and 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 
401 and 403; 30 Stat. 1151), commonly known as the Rivers and Harbors 
Appropriation Act of 1899, section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), and the National Environmental Policy Act 
of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (d) Expiration Date.--If, 20 years from the date of enactment of 
this Act, any area or part thereof described in subsection (b) is not 
bulkheaded or filled or occupied by permanent structures, including 
marina facilities, in accordance with the requirements set out in 
subsection (c), or if work in connection with any activity permitted in 
subsection (c) is not commenced within 5 years after issuance of such 
permits, then the declaration of nonnavigability for such area or part 
thereof shall expire.

SEC. 5055. SAN PABLO BAY, CALIFORNIA, WATERSHED AND SUISUN MARSH 
              ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    (a) San Pablo Bay Watershed, California.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall complete work, as 
        expeditiously as possible, on the ongoing San Pablo Bay 
        watershed, California, study to determine the feasibility of 
        opportunities for restoring, preserving and protecting the San 
        Pablo Bay watershed.
            (2) Report.--Not later than March 31, 2008, the Secretary 
        shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the study.
    (b) Suisun Marsh, California.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
comprehensive study to determine the feasibility of opportunities for 
restoring, preserving and protecting the Suisun Marsh, California.
    (c) San Pablo and Suisun Bay Marsh Watershed Critical Restoration 
Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in critical 
        restoration projects that will produce, consistent with Federal 
        programs, projects, and activities, immediate and substantial 
        ecosystem restoration, preservation, and protection benefits in 
        the following sub-watersheds of the San Pablo and Suisun Bay 
        Marsh watersheds:
                    (A) The tidal areas of the Petaluma River, Napa-
                Sonoma Marsh.
                    (B) The shoreline of West Contra Costa County.
                    (C) Novato Creek.
                    (D) Suisun Marsh.
                    (E) Gallinas-Miller Creek.
            (2) Types of assistance.--Participation in critical 
        restoration projects under this subsection may include 
        assistance for planning, design, or construction.
    (d) Non-Federal Interests.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), a non-Federal 
interest may include for any project undertaken under this section a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    (e) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of construction of a project under this section--
            (1) the value of any lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
        dredged material disposal areas, or relocations provided by the 
        non-Federal interest for carrying out the project, regardless 
        of the date of acquisition;
            (2) funds received from the CALFED Bay-Delta program; and
            (3) the cost of the studies, design, and construction work 
        carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of 
        execution of a partnership agreement for the project if the 
        Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

SEC. 5056. STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Reevaluation.--The Secretary shall reevaluate the feasibility 
of the Lower Mosher Slough element and the levee extensions on the 
Upper Calaveras River element of the project for flood control, 
Stockton Metropolitan Area, California, carried out under section 
211(f)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3683), to determine the eligibility of such elements for reimbursement 
under section 211 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 701b-13).
    (b) Special Rules for Reevaluation.--In conducting the reevaluation 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall not reject a feasibility 
determination based on one or more of the policies of the Corps of 
Engineers concerning the frequency of flooding, the drainage area, and 
the amount of runoff.
    (c) Reimbursement.--If the Secretary determines that the elements 
referred to subsection (a) are feasible, the Secretary shall reimburse, 
subject to appropriations, the non-Federal interest under section 211 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 for the Federal share of 
the cost of such elements.

SEC. 5057. CHARLES HERVEY TOWNSHEND BREAKWATER, NEW HAVEN HARBOR, 
              CONNECTICUT.

    (a) Designation.--The western breakwater for the project for 
navigation, New Haven Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the first 
section of the Act of September 19, 1890 (26 Stat. 426), shall be known 
and designated as the ``Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the breakwater referred 
to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Charles 
Hervey Townshend Breakwater''.

SEC. 5058. FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS.

    Section 109 of the Miscellaneous Appropriations Act, 2001 (enacted 
into law by Public Law 106-554) (114 Stat. 2763A-222) is amended--
            (1) by adding at the end of subsection (e)(2) the 
        following:
                    ``(C) Credit for work prior to execution of the 
                partnership agreement.--The Secretary shall credit 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project--
                            ``(i) the cost of construction work carried 
                        out by the non-Federal interest before the date 
                        of the partnership agreement for the project if 
                        the Secretary determines that the work is 
                        integral to the project; and
                            ``(ii) the cost of land acquisition carried 
                        out by the non-Federal interest for projects to 
                        be carried out under this section.''; and
            (2) in subsection (f) by striking ``$100,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$100,000,000, of which not more than $15,000,000 
        may be used to provide planning, design, and construction 
        assistance to the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority for a water 
        treatment plant, Florida City, Florida''.

SEC. 5059. LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary may carry out necessary repairs for the Lake Worth 
bulkhead replacement project, West Palm Beach, Florida, at an estimated 
total cost of $9,000,000.

SEC. 5060. EAST CENTRAL AND NORTHEAST FLORIDA.

    (a) East Central and Northeast Florida Region Defined.--In this 
section, the term ``East Central and Northeast Florida Region'' means 
Flagler County, St. Johns County, Putman County (east of the St. Johns 
River), Seminole County, Volusia County, the towns of Winter Park, 
Maitland, and Palatka, Florida.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the East Central and Northeast Florida Region.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in the East Central and Northeast Florida Region, including 
projects for wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply 
and related facilities, environmental restoration, and surface water 
resource protection and development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the effective 
                long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal 
                interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the project 
                costs under each partnership agreement entered into 
                under this subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal 
                share may be provided in the form of grants or 
                reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The non-Federal interests 
                shall receive credit for the reasonable cost of design 
                work on a project completed by the non-Federal interest 
                before entering into a partnership agreement with the 
                Secretary for such project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of a project that is 
                the subject of an agreement under this section, the 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of the project's costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but such credit may not exceed 25 
                percent of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
undertaken under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section at 
Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 5061. LAKE LANIER, GEORGIA.

    The Secretary may assist local interests with planning, design, and 
construction of facilities at the Lake Lanier Olympic Center, Georgia, 
at a total cost of $5,300,000.

SEC. 5062. RILEY CREEK RECREATION AREA, IDAHO.

    The Secretary is authorized to carry out the Riley Creek Recreation 
Area Operation Plan of the Albeni Falls Management Plan, dated October 
2001, for the Riley Creek Recreation Area, Albeni Falls Dam, Bonner 
County, Idaho.

SEC. 5063. RECONSTRUCTION OF ILLINOIS FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
reconstruction of an eligible flood control project if the Secretary 
determines that such reconstruction is not required as a result of 
improper operation and maintenance of the project by the non-Federal 
interest.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the costs for the 
reconstruction of a flood control project authorized by this section 
shall be the same non-Federal share that was applicable to construction 
of the project. The non-Federal interest shall be responsible for 
operation and maintenance and repair of a project for which 
reconstruction is undertaken under this section.
    (c) Reconstruction Defined.--In this section, the term 
``reconstruction'', as used with respect to a project, means addressing 
major project deficiencies caused by long-term degradation of the 
foundation, construction materials, or engineering systems or 
components of the project, the results of which render the project at 
risk of not performing in compliance with its authorized project 
purposes. In addressing such deficiencies, the Secretary may 
incorporate current design standards and efficiency improvements, 
including the replacement of obsolete mechanical and electrical 
components at pumping stations, if such incorporation does not 
significantly change the scope, function, and purpose of the project as 
authorized.
    (d) Eligible Projects.--The following flood control projects are 
eligible for reconstruction under this section:
            (1) Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, Illinois.
            (2) Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District, 
        Illinois.
            (3) Cairo, Illinois Mainline Levee, Cairo, Illinois.
            (4) Goose Pond Pump Station, Cairo, Illinois.
            (5) Cottonwood Slough Pump Station, Alexander County, 
        Illinois.
            (6) 10th and 28th Street Pump Stations, Cairo, Illinois.
            (7) Prairie Du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, including 
        Fish Lake Drainage and Levee District, Illinois.
            (8) Flood control levee projects in Brookport, Shawneetown, 
        Old Shawneetown, Golconda, Rosiclare, Harrisburg, and 
        Reevesville, Illinois.
    (e) Justification.--The reconstruction of a project authorized by 
this section shall not be considered a separable element of the 
project.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated--
            (1) $15,000,000 to carry out the projects described in 
        paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (d); and
            (2) $15,000,000 to carry out the projects described in 
        subsection (d)(8).
Such sums shall remain available until expended.

SEC. 5064. ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION.

    (a) Extension of Authorization.--Section 519(c)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2654) is amended by 
striking ``2004'' and inserting ``2010''.
    (b) In-Kind Services.--Section 519(g)(3) of such Act (114 Stat. 
2655) is amended by inserting before the period at the end of the first 
sentence ``if such services are provided not more than 5 years before 
the date of initiation of the project or activity''.
    (c) Nonprofit Entities and Monitoring.--Section 519 of such Act 
(114 Stat. 2654) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), a non-Federal 
interest may include for any project undertaken under this section a 
nonprofit entity, with the consent of the affected local government.
    ``(i) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall develop an Illinois river 
basin monitoring program to support the plan referred to in subsection 
(b). Data collected under the monitoring program shall incorporate data 
provided by the State of Illinois and shall be publicly accessible 
through electronic means.''.

SEC. 5065. KASKASKIA RIVER BASIN, ILLINOIS, RESTORATION.

    (a) Kaskaskia River Basin Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Kaskaskia River Basin'' means the Kaskaskia River, Illinois, its 
backwaters, its side channels, and all tributaries, including their 
watersheds, draining into the Kaskaskia River.
    (b) Comprehensive Plan.--
            (1) Development.--The Secretary shall develop, as 
        expeditiously as practicable, a comprehensive plan for the 
        purpose of restoring, preserving, and protecting the Kaskaskia 
        River Basin.
            (2) Technologies and innovative approaches.--The 
        comprehensive plan shall provide for the development of new 
        technologies and innovative approaches--
                    (A) to enhance the Kaskaskia River as a 
                transportation corridor;
                    (B) to improve water quality within the entire 
                Kaskaskia River Basin;
                    (C) to restore, enhance, and preserve habitat for 
                plants and wildlife;
                    (D) to ensure aquatic integrity of sidechannels and 
                backwaters and their connectivity with the mainstem 
                river;
                    (E) to increase economic opportunity for 
                agriculture and business communities; and
                    (F) to reduce the impacts of flooding to 
                communities and landowners.
            (3) Specific components.--The comprehensive plan shall 
        include such features as are necessary to provide for--
                    (A) the development and implementation of a program 
                for sediment removal technology, sediment 
                characterization, sediment transport, and beneficial 
                uses of sediment;
                    (B) the development and implementation of a program 
                for the planning, conservation, evaluation, and 
                construction of measures for fish and wildlife habitat 
                conservation and rehabilitation, and stabilization and 
                enhancement of land and water resources in the basin;
                    (C) the development and implementation of a long-
                term resource monitoring program;
                    (D) a conveyance study of the Kaskaskia River 
                floodplain from Vandalia, Illinois, to Carlyle Lake to 
                determine the impacts of existing and future waterfowl 
                improvements on flood stages, including detailed 
                surveys and mapping information to ensure proper 
                hydraulic and hydrological analysis;
                    (E) the development and implementation of a 
                computerized inventory and analysis system; and
                    (F) the development and implementation of a 
                systemic plan to reduce flood impacts by means of 
                ecosystem restoration projects.
            (4) Consultation.--The comprehensive plan shall be 
        developed by the Secretary in consultation with appropriate 
        Federal agencies, the State of Illinois, and the Kaskaskia 
        River Watershed Association.
            (5) Report to congress.--Not later than 2 years after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to 
        Congress a report containing the comprehensive plan.
            (6) Additional studies and analyses.--After transmission of 
        a report under paragraph (5), the Secretary shall conduct 
        studies and analyses of projects related to the comprehensive 
        plan that are appropriate and consistent with this subsection.
    (c) General Provisions.--
            (1) Water quality.--In carrying out activities under this 
        section, the Secretary's recommendations shall be consistent 
        with applicable State water quality standards.
            (2) Public participation.--In developing the comprehensive 
        plan under subsection (b), the Secretary shall implement 
        procedures to facilitate public participation, including 
        providing advance notice of meetings, providing adequate 
        opportunity for public input and comment, maintaining 
        appropriate records, and making a record of the proceedings of 
        meetings available for public inspection.
    (d) Critical Projects and Initiatives.--If the Secretary, in 
cooperation with appropriate Federal agencies and the State of 
Illinois, determines that a project or initiative for the Kaskaskia 
River Basin will produce independent, immediate, and substantial 
benefits, the Secretary may proceed expeditiously with the 
implementation of the project.
    (e) Coordination.--The Secretary shall integrate activities carried 
out under this section with ongoing Federal and State programs, 
projects, and activities, including the following:
            (1) Farm programs of the Department of Agriculture.
            (2) Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (State of 
        Illinois) and Conservation 2000 Ecosystem Program of the 
        Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
            (3) Conservation 2000 Conservation Practices Program and 
        the Livestock Management Facilities Act administered by the 
        Illinois Department of Agriculture.
            (4) National Buffer Initiative of the Natural Resources 
        Conservation Service.
            (5) Nonpoint source grant program administered by the 
        Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
            (6) Other programs that may be developed by the State of 
        Illinois or the Federal Government, or that are carried out by 
        non-profit organizations, to carry out the objectives of the 
        Kaskaskia River Basin Comprehensive Plan.
    (f) In-Kind Services.--The Secretary may credit the cost of in-kind 
services provided by the non-Federal interest for an activity carried 
out under this section toward not more than 80 percent of the non-
Federal share of the cost of the activity. In-kind services shall 
include all State funds expended on programs that accomplish the goals 
of this section, as determined by the Secretary. The programs may 
include the Kaskaskia River Conservation Reserve Program, the Illinois 
Conservation 2000 Program, the Open Lands Trust Fund, and other 
appropriate programs carried out in the Kaskaskia River Basin.

SEC. 5066. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for a 
project to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood inundation 
areas along the Little Calumet River, Chicago, Illinois.
    (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall include 
hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall accurately show the 
flood inundation of each property by flood risk in the floodplain. The 
maps shall be produced in a high resolution format and shall be made 
available to all flood prone areas along the Little Calumet River, 
Chicago, Illinois, in an electronic format.
    (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-Federal 
interests for the project shall work with the Director of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency to ensure the validity of the maps 
developed under the project for flood insurance purposes.
    (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the 
Secretary may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements with the 
non-Federal interests or provide reimbursements of project costs.
    (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
shall be 50 percent.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,000,000.

SEC. 5067. PROMONTORY POINT, LAKE MICHIGAN, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Review.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may carry out a third-party 
        review of the Promontory Point project along the Chicago 
        Shoreline, Chicago, Illinois, at a cost not to exceed $450,000.
            (2) Joint review.--The Buffalo and Seattle districts of the 
        Corps of Engineers shall jointly conduct the review.
            (3) Standards.--The review shall be based on the standards 
        under part 68 of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, for 
        implementation by the non-Federal sponsor for the Chicago 
        Shoreline, Chicago, Illinois, project.
    (b) Contributions.--The Secretary shall accept from a State or 
political subdivision of a State voluntarily contributed funds to 
initiate the third-party review under subsection (a).
    (c) Effect of Section.--Nothing in this section affects the 
authorization for the project for the Chicago Shoreline, Chicago, 
Illinois.

SEC. 5068. SOUTHWEST ILLINOIS.

    (a) Southwest Illinois Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Southwest Illinois'' means the counties of Madison, St. Clair, 
Monroe, Randolph, Perry, Franklin, Jackson, Union, Alexander, Pulaski, 
and Williamson, Illinois.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
Southwest Illinois.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in Southwest Illinois, including projects for wastewater 
treatment and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
and surface water resource protection and development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement entered into 
        under this subsection shall provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the effective 
                long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal 
                interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the project 
                costs under each partnership agreement entered into 
                under this subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal 
                share may be in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
                project costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The non-Federal interests 
                shall receive credit for the reasonable cost of design 
                work on a project completed by the non-Federal interest 
                before entering into a partnership agreement with the 
                Secretary for such project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of a project that is 
                the subject of an agreement under this section, the 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of the project's costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
                project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
undertaken under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section at 
Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 5069. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, INDIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of shoaling in the vicinity of 
Burns Waterway Harbor, Indiana, to determine if the shoaling is the 
result of a Federal navigation project, and, if the Secretary 
determines that the shoaling is the result of a Federal navigation 
project, the Secretary shall carry out a project to mitigate the 
shoaling under section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 
U.S.C. 426).

SEC. 5070. CALUMET REGION, INDIANA.

    Section 219(f)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 335; 117 Stat. 1843) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$30,000,000'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$100,000,000'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward 
                the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
                cost of planning and design work carried out by the 
                non-Federal interest before, on, or after the date of 
                the partnership agreement for the project if the 
                Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
                project.''; and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
        (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
        subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).

SEC. 5071. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, MISSOURI RIVER, IOWA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for a 
project to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood inundation 
areas in the State of Iowa, along the Missouri River.
    (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall include 
hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall accurately portray the 
flood hazard areas in the floodplain. The maps shall be produced in a 
high resolution format and shall be made available to the State of Iowa 
in an electronic format.
    (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-Federal 
interests for the project shall work with the Director of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency to ensure the validity of the maps 
developed under the project for flood insurance purposes.
    (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the 
Secretary may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements with the 
non-Federal interests or provide reimbursements of project costs.
    (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
shall be 50 percent.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000.

SEC. 5072. PADUCAH, KENTUCKY.

    The Secretary shall complete a feasibility report for 
rehabilitation of the project for flood damage reduction, Paducah, 
Kentucky, authorized by section 4 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 
1938 (52 Stat. 1217) and, if the Secretary determines that the project 
is feasible, the Secretary shall carry out the project at a total cost 
of $3,000,000.

SEC. 5073. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY.

    Section 531 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3773; 113 Stat. 348; 117 Stat. 142) is amended by adding the 
following:
    ``(i) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section at 
Federal expense.''.

SEC. 5074. WINCHESTER, KENTUCKY.

    Section 219(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4835; 114 Stat. 2763A-219) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(41) Winchester, kentucky.--Wastewater infrastructure, 
        Winchester, Kentucky.''.

SEC. 5075. BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA.

    Section 219(f)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended by striking 
``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$35,000,000''.

SEC. 5076. CALCASIEU SHIP CHANNEL, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall expedite completion of a dredged material 
management plan for the Calcasieu Ship Channel, Louisiana, and may take 
interim measures to increase the capacity of existing disposal areas, 
or to construct new confined or beneficial use disposal areas, for the 
channel.

SEC. 5077. EAST ATCHAFALAYA BASIN AND AMITE RIVER BASIN REGION, 
              LOUISIANA.

    (a) East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin Region Defined.--
In this section, the term ``East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River 
Basin Region'' means the following parishes and municipalities in the 
State of Louisiana: Ascension, East Baton Rouge, East Feliciana, 
Iberville, Livingston, Pointe Coupee, St. Helena, West Baton Rouge, and 
West Feliciana.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin Region.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in the East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin Region, 
including projects for wastewater treatment and related facilities, 
water supply and related facilities, environmental restoration, and 
surface water resource protection and development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement of a project 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the effective 
                long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal 
                interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the project 
                costs under each partnership agreement entered into 
                under this subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal 
                share may be provided in the form of grants or 
                reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The non-Federal interests 
                shall receive credit for the reasonable cost of design 
                work on a project completed by the non-Federal interest 
                before entering into a partnership agreement with the 
                Secretary for such project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of a project that is 
                the subject of an agreement under this section, the 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of the project's costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but such credit may not exceed 25 
                percent of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
undertaken under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section at 
Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 5078. WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LOUISIANA.

    (a) Modification of Study.--The study for waterfront and riverine 
preservation, restoration, and enhancement, Mississippi River, West 
Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, being carried out under Committee 
Resolution 2570 of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
of the House of Representatives adopted July 23, 1998, is modified--
            (1) to add West Feliciana Parish and East Baton Rouge 
        Parish to the geographic scope of the study; and
            (2) to direct the Secretary to credit toward the non-
        Federal share the cost of the study and the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of any project authorized by law as a result of the 
        study the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
        before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if 
        the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the study 
        or project, as the case may be.
    (b) Expedited Consideration.--Section 517(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 345) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(5) Mississippi River, West Baton Rouge, West Feliciana, 
        and East Baton Rouge Parishes, Louisiana, project for 
        waterfront and riverine preservation, restoration, and 
        enhancement modifications.''.

SEC. 5079. CHARLESTOWN, MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a project for 
nonstructural flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration at 
Charlestown, Maryland.
    (b) Land Acquisition.--The flood damage reduction component of the 
project may include the acquisition of private property from willing 
sellers.
    (c) Justification.--Any nonstructural flood damage reduction 
project to be carried out under this section that will result in the 
conversion of property to use for ecosystem restoration and wildlife 
habitat shall be justified based on national ecosystem restoration 
benefits.
    (d) Use of Acquired Property.--Property acquired under this section 
shall be maintained in public ownership for ecosystem restoration and 
wildlife habitat.
    (e) Ability to Pay.--In determining the appropriate non-Federal 
cost share for the project, the Secretary shall determine the ability 
of Cecil County, Maryland, to participate as a cost-sharing non-Federal 
interest in accordance with section 103(m) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)).
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $2,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5080. ANACOSTIA RIVER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND MARYLAND.

    (a) Comprehensive Action Plan.--Not later than one year after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in coordination with the 
Mayor of the District of Columbia, the Governor of Maryland, the county 
executives of Montgomery County and Prince George's County, Maryland, 
and other interested entities, shall develop and make available to the 
public a 10-year comprehensive action plan to provide for the 
restoration and protection of the ecological integrity of the Anacostia 
River and its tributaries.
    (b) Public Availability.--On completion of the comprehensive action 
plan under subsection (a), the Secretary shall make the plan available 
to the public, including on the Internet.

SEC. 5081. DELMARVA CONSERVATION CORRIDOR, DELAWARE AND MARYLAND.

    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide technical assistance to 
the Secretary of Agriculture for use in carrying out the Conservation 
Corridor Demonstration Program established under subtitle G of title II 
of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (16 U.S.C. 3801 
note; 116 Stat. 275).
    (b) Coordination and Integration.--In carrying out water resources 
projects in Delaware and Maryland on the Delmarva Peninsula, the 
Secretary shall coordinate and integrate those projects, to the maximum 
extent practicable, with any activities carried out to implement a 
conservation corridor plan approved by the Secretary of Agriculture 
under section 2602 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 
2002 (16 U.S.C. 3801 note; 116 Stat. 275).

SEC. 5082. MASSACHUSETTS DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES.

    The Secretary may cooperate with Massachusetts in the management 
and long-term monitoring of aquatic dredged material disposal sites 
within the State, and is authorized to accept funds from the State to 
carry out such activities.

SEC. 5083. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of shore damage in the vicinity 
of the project for navigation, Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, 
Michigan, authorized by section 101 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 
1962 (76 Stat. 1176, 100 Stat. 4213, 110 Stat. 3730), to determine if 
the damage is the result of a Federal navigation project, and, if the 
Secretary determines that the damage is the result of a Federal 
navigation project, the Secretary shall carry out a project to mitigate 
the damage under section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 
U.S.C. 426i).

SEC. 5084. CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for emergency 
streambank protection along the Red Lake River in Crookston, Minnesota, 
and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, the 
Secretary may carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r); except that the maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be expended for the project shall be $6,500,000.

SEC. 5085. GARRISON AND KATHIO TOWNSHIP, MINNESOTA.

    (a) Project Description.--Section 219(f)(61) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-221) is amended--
            (1) in the paragraph heading by striking ``and kathio 
        township'' and inserting ``, crow wing county, mille lacs 
        county, mille lacs indian reservation, and kathio township'';
            (2) by striking ``$11,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$17,000,000'';
            (3) by inserting ``, Crow Wing County, Mille Lacs County, 
        Mille Lacs Indian Reservation (10 Stat. 1165),'' after 
        ``Garrison''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following: ``Such assistance 
        shall be provided directly to the Garrison-Kathio-West Mille 
        Lacs Lake Sanitary District, Minnesota, except for assistance 
        provided directly to the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe at the 
        discretion of the Secretary.''.
    (b) Procedures.--In carrying out the project authorized by such 
section 219(f)(61), the Secretary may use the cost sharing and 
contracting procedures available to the Secretary under section 569 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368).

SEC. 5086. ITASCA COUNTY, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood damage reduction, 
Trout Lake and Canisteo Pit, Itasca County, Minnesota, irrespective of 
normal policy considerations.

SEC. 5087. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA.

    (a) Conveyance.--The Secretary shall convey to the city of 
Minneapolis by quitclaim deed and without consideration all right, 
title, and interest of the United States to the property known as the 
War Department (Fort Snelling Interceptor) Tunnel in Minneapolis, 
Minnesota.
    (b) Applicability of Property Screening Provisions.--Section 2696 
of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply to the conveyance 
under this section.

SEC. 5088. NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--Section 569 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 368) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``Benton, Sherburne,'' 
        and inserting ``Beltrami, Hubbard, Wadena,'';
            (2) by striking the last sentence of subsection (e)(3)(B);
            (3) by striking subsection (g) and inserting the following:
    ``(g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), a non-Federal 
interest may include for any project undertaken under this section a 
nonprofit entity.'';
            (4) in subsection (h) by striking ``$40,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$54,000,000''; and
            (5) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section at 
Federal expense.''.
    (b) Biwabik, Minnesota.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-
Federal interest for the project for environmental infrastructure, 
Biwabik, Minnesota, carried out under section 569 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368), for planning, 
design, and construction costs that were incurred by the non-Federal 
interest with respect to the project before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project and that were in excess of the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project if the Secretary determines that the 
costs are appropriate.

SEC. 5089. WILD RICE RIVER, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the general 
reevaluation report, authorized by section 438 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2640), for the project for flood 
protection, Wild Rice River, Minnesota, authorized by section 201 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1825), to develop alternatives 
to the Twin Valley Lake feature, and upon the completion of such 
report, shall construct the project at a total cost of $20,000,000.

SEC. 5090. HARRISON, HANCOCK, AND JACKSON COUNTIES, MISSISSIPPI.

    In carrying out projects for the protection, restoration, and 
creation of aquatic and ecologically related habitats located in 
Harrison, Hancock, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi, under section 204 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326), the 
Secretary shall accept any portion of the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project in the form of in-kind services and materials.

SEC. 5091. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSOURI AND ILLINOIS.

    As a part of the operation and maintenance of the project for the 
Mississippi River (Regulating Works), between the Ohio and Missouri 
Rivers, Missouri and Illinois, authorized by the first section of an 
Act entitled ``Making appropriations for the construction, repair, and 
preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for 
other purposes'', approved June 25, 1910, the Secretary may carry out 
activities necessary to restore and protect fish and wildlife habitat 
in the middle Mississippi River system. Such activities may include 
modification of navigation training structures, modification and 
creation of side channels, modification and creation of islands, and 
studies and analysis necessary to apply adaptive management principles 
in design of future work.

SEC. 5092. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

    Section 219(f)(32) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 337) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``project'' and inserting ``projects'';
            (2) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$35,000,000''; and
            (3) by inserting ``and St. Louis County'' before ``, 
        Missouri''.

SEC. 5093. HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS AREA, NEW JERSEY.

    Section 324 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4849; 110 Stat. 3779) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``design'' and inserting 
                ``planning, design,''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Hackensack Meadowlands 
                Development'' and all that follows through ``Plan for'' 
                and inserting ``New Jersey Meadowlands Commission for 
                the development of an environmental improvement program 
                for'';
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in the subsection heading by striking 
                ``Required'';
                    (B) by striking ``shall'' and inserting ``may'';
                    (C) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(1) Restoration and acquisitions of significant wetlands 
        and aquatic habitat that contribute to the Meadowlands 
        ecosystem.'';
                    (D) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``and aquatic 
                habitat'' before the period at the end; and
                    (E) by striking paragraph (7) and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(7) Research, development, and implementation for a water 
        quality improvement program, including restoration of hydrology 
        and tidal flows and remediation of hot spots and other sources 
        of contaminants that degrade existing or planned sites.'';
            (3) in subsection (c) by inserting before the last sentence 
        the following: ``The non-Federal sponsor may also provide in-
        kind services, not to exceed the non-Federal share of the total 
        project cost, and may also receive credit for reasonable cost 
        of design work completed prior to entering into the partnership 
        agreement with the Secretary for a project to be carried out 
        under the program developed under subsection (a).''; and
            (4) in subsection (d) by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$35,000,000''.

SEC. 5094. ATLANTIC COAST OF NEW YORK.

    (a) Development of Program.--Section 404(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4863) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``processes'' and inserting ``and related 
        environmental processes'';
            (2) by inserting after ``Atlantic Coast'' the following: 
        ``(and associated back bays)'';
            (3) by inserting after ``actions'' the following: ``, 
        environmental restoration or conservation measures for coastal 
        and back bays,''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following: ``The plan for 
        collecting data and monitoring information included in such 
        annual report shall be fully coordinated with and agreed to by 
        appropriate agencies of the State of New York.''.
    (b) Annual Reports.--Section 404(b) of such Act is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Initial Plan.--Not later than 12 months 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act, the'' and 
        inserting ``Annual Reports.--The'';
            (2) by striking ``initial plan for data collection and 
        monitoring'' and inserting ``annual report of data collection 
        and monitoring activities''; and
            (3) by striking the last sentence.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 404(c) of such Act 
(113 Stat. 341) is amended by striking ``and an additional total of 
$2,500,000 for fiscal years thereafter'' and inserting ``$2,500,000 for 
fiscal years 2000 through 2004, and $7,500,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2004,''.
    (d) Tsunami Warning System.--Section 404 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4863) is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``(d) Tsunami Warning System.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $800,000 for the Secretary to carry out a project for a 
tsunami warning system, Atlantic Coast of New York.''.

SEC. 5095. COLLEGE POINT, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK.

    In carrying out section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4639), the Secretary shall give priority to work in 
College Point, New York City, New York.

SEC. 5096. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project for ecosystem restoration, Flushing Bay and Creek, New 
York City, New York, the cost of design and construction work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project.

SEC. 5097. HUDSON RIVER, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary may participate with the State of New York, New York 
City, and the Hudson River Park Trust in carrying out activities to 
restore critical marine habitat, improve safety, and protect and 
rehabilitate critical infrastructure. There is authorized to be 
appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5098. MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NEW YORK.

    As part of the operation and maintenance of the Mount Morris Dam, 
New York, the Secretary may make improvements to the access road for 
the dam to provide safe access to a Federal visitor's center.

SEC. 5099. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the calculations 
necessary to negotiate and execute a revised, permanent contract for 
water supply storage at John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina, 
among the Secretary and the Kerr Lake Regional Water System and the 
city of Henderson, North Carolina.

SEC. 5100. STANLY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.

    Section 219(f)(64) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(114 Stat. 2763A-221) is amended by inserting ``water and'' before 
``wastewater''.

SEC. 5101. CINCINNATI, OHIO.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to undertake the 
ecosystem restoration and recreation components of the Central 
Riverfront Park Master Plan, dated December 1999, at a total cost of 
$25,000,000.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the cost of planning, design, and 
construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 5102. TOUSSAINT RIVER, OHIO.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Toussaint River, 
Carroll Township, Ohio, authorized by section 107 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to enter into an agreement with the non-Federal interest 
under which the Secretary may--
            (1) acquire, and transfer to the non-Federal interest, a 
        dredge and associated equipment with the capacity to perform 
        operation and maintenance of the project; and
            (2) provide the non-Federal interest with a lump-sum 
        payment to cover all future costs of operation and maintenance 
        of the project.
    (b) Agreement.--The Secretary may carry out subsection (a)(1) by 
entering into an agreement with the non-Federal interest under which 
the non-Federal interest may acquire the dredge and associated 
equipment directly and be reimbursed by the Secretary.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $1,800,000 to carry out this section. Of such funds, 
$500,000 may be used to carry out subsection (a)(1).
    (d) Release.--Upon the acquisition and transfer of a dredge and 
associated equipment under subsection (a)(1), and the payment of funds 
under subsection (a)(2), all future Federal responsibility for 
operation and maintenance of the project is extinguished.

SEC. 5103. EUGENE, OREGON.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of restoring the millrace in Eugene, Oregon, and, if 
the Secretary determines that the restoration is feasible, the 
Secretary shall carry out the restoration.
    (b) Consideration of Noneconomic Benefits.--In determining the 
feasibility of restoring the millrace, the Secretary shall include 
noneconomic benefits associated with the historical significance of the 
millrace and associated with preservation and enhancement of resources.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000.

SEC. 5104. FERN RIDGE DAM, OREGON.

    The Secretary may treat all work carried out for emergency 
corrective actions to repair the embankment dam at the Fern Ridge Lake 
project, Oregon, as a dam safety project. The cost of work carried out 
may be recovered in accordance with section 1203 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 467n; 100 Stat. 4263).

SEC. 5105. ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 219(f)(66) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(114 Stat. 2763A-221) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$20,000,000'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward 
                the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
                cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
                before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
                integral to the project.''; and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
        (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
        subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).

SEC. 5106. CLINTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 219(f)(13) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 335) is amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting 
``$2,000,000''.

SEC. 5107. KEHLY RUN DAMS, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 504(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 338; 117 Stat. 1842) is amended by striking ``Dams'' and 
inserting ``Dams No. 1-5''.

SEC. 5108. LEHIGH RIVER, LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall use existing water quality data to model the 
effects of the Francis E. Walter Dam, at different water levels, to 
determine its impact on water and related resources in and along the 
Lehigh River in Lehigh County, Pennsylvania. There is authorized to be 
appropriated $500,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5109. NORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 219(f)(11) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 335) is amended by striking ``and Monroe'' and inserting 
``Northumberland, Union, Snyder, Luzerne, and Monroe''.

SEC. 5110. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW YORK.

    (a) Study and Strategy Development.--Section 567(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3787; 114 Stat. 2662) is 
amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by inserting 
        ``and carry out'' after ``develop''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2) by striking ``$10,000,000.'' and 
        inserting ``$20,000,000, of which the Secretary may utilize not 
        more than $5,000,000 to design and construct feasible pilot 
        projects during the development of the strategy to demonstrate 
        alternative approaches for the strategy. The total cost for any 
        single pilot project may not exceed $500,000. The Secretary 
        shall evaluate the results of the pilot projects and consider 
        the results in the development of the strategy.''.
    (b) Cooperative Agreements.--Section 567(c) of such Act (114 Stat. 
2662) is amended--
            (1) in the subsection heading by striking ``Cooperation'' 
        and inserting ``Cooperative''; and
            (2) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by inserting ``and carrying out'' after 
                ``developing''; and
                    (B) by striking ``cooperation'' and inserting 
                ``cost-sharing and cooperative''.
    (c) Implementation of Strategy.--Section 567(d) of such Act (114 
Stat. 2663) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary'';
            (2) in the second sentence of paragraph (1) (as so 
        designated)--
                    (A) by striking ``implement'' and inserting ``carry 
                out''; and
                    (B) by striking ``implementing'' and inserting 
                ``carrying out'';
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Priority project.--In carrying out projects to 
        implement the strategy, the Secretary shall give priority to 
        the project for ecosystem restoration, Cooperstown, New York, 
        described in the Upper Susquehanna River Basin--Cooperstown 
        Area Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study, dated December 
        2004, prepared by the Corps of Engineers and the New York State 
        Department of Environmental Conservation.''; and
            (4) by aligning the remainder of the text of paragraph (1) 
        (as designated by paragraph (1) of this subsection) with 
        paragraph (2) (as added by paragraph (3) of this subsection).
    (d) Credit.--Section 567 of such Act (110 Stat. 3787; 114 Stat. 
2662) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of a project under this section--
            ``(1) the cost of design and construction work carried out 
        by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
        agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the 
        work is integral to the project; and
            ``(2) the cost of in-kind services and materials provided 
        for the project by the non-Federal interest.''.

SEC. 5111. CANO MARTIN PENA, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO.

    The Secretary shall review a report prepared by the non-Federal 
interest concerning flood protection and environmental restoration for 
Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, Puerto Rico, and, if the Secretary 
determines that the report meets the evaluation and design standards of 
the Corps of Engineers and that the project is feasible, the Secretary 
may carry out the project at a total cost of $130,000,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $85,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $45,000,000.

SEC. 5112. CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE, AND 
              TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    (a) Disbursement Provisions of the State of South Dakota and the 
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Terrestrial 
Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Funds.--Section 602(a)(4) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 386) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) in clause (i) by inserting ``and the Secretary 
                of the Treasury'' after ``Secretary''; and
                    (B) by striking clause (ii) and inserting the 
                following:
                            ``(ii) Availability of funds.--On 
                        notification in accordance with clause (i), the 
                        Secretary of the Treasury shall make available 
                        to the State of South Dakota funds from the 
                        State of South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife 
                        Habitat Restoration Trust Fund established 
                        under section 603, to be used to carry out the 
                        plan for terrestrial wildlife habitat 
                        restoration submitted by the State of South 
                        Dakota after the State certifies to the 
                        Secretary of the Treasury that the funds to be 
                        disbursed will be used in accordance with 
                        section 603(d)(3) and only after the Trust Fund 
                        is fully capitalized.''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B) by striking clause (ii) and 
        inserting the following:
                            ``(ii) Availability of funds.--On 
                        notification in accordance with clause (i), the 
                        Secretary of the Treasury shall make available 
                        to the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower 
                        Brule Sioux Tribe funds from the Cheyenne River 
                        Sioux Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration 
                        Trust Fund and the Lower Brule Sioux 
                        Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust 
                        Fund, respectively, established under section 
                        604, to be used to carry out the plans for 
                        terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration 
                        submitted by the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and 
                        the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, respectively, to 
                        after the respective tribe certifies to the 
                        Secretary of the Treasury that the funds to be 
                        disbursed will be used in accordance with 
                        section 604(d)(3) and only after the Trust Fund 
                        is fully capitalized.''.
    (b) Investment Provisions of the State of South Dakota Terrestrial 
Wildlife Restoration Trust Fund.--Section 603 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 388; 114 Stat. 2664) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:
    ``(c) Investments.--
            ``(1) Eligible obligations.--Notwithstanding any other 
        provision of law, the Secretary of the Treasury shall invest 
        the amounts deposited under subsection (b) and the interest 
        earned on those amounts only in interest-bearing obligations of 
        the United States issued directly to the Fund.
            ``(2) Investment requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury 
                shall invest the amounts in the Fund in accordance with 
                the requirements of this paragraph.
                    ``(B) Separate investments of principal and 
                interest.--
                            ``(i) Principal account.--The amounts 
                        deposited in the Fund under subsection (b) 
                        shall be credited to an account within the Fund 
                        (referred to in this paragraph as the 
                        `principal account') and invested as provided 
                        in subparagraph (C).
                            ``(ii) Interest account.--The interest 
                        earned from investing amounts in the principal 
                        account of the Fund shall be transferred to a 
                        separate account within the Fund (referred to 
                        in this paragraph as the `interest account') 
                        and invested as provided in subparagraph (D).
                            ``(iii) Crediting.--The interest earned 
                        from investing amounts in the interest account 
                        of the Fund shall be credited to the interest 
                        account.
                    ``(C) Investment of principal account.--
                            ``(i) Initial investment.--Each amount 
                        deposited in the principal account of the Fund 
                        shall be invested initially in eligible 
                        obligations having the shortest maturity then 
                        available until the date on which the amount is 
                        divided into 3 substantially equal portions and 
                        those portions are invested in eligible 
                        obligations that are identical (except for 
                        transferability) to the next-issued publicly 
                        issued Treasury obligations having a 2-year 
                        maturity, a 5-year maturity, and a 10-year 
                        maturity, respectively.
                            ``(ii) Subsequent investment.--As each 2-
                        year, 5-year, and 10-year eligible obligation 
                        matures, the principal of the maturing eligible 
                        obligation shall also be invested initially in 
                        the shortest-maturity eligible obligation then 
                        available until the principal is reinvested 
                        substantially equally in the eligible 
                        obligations that are identical (except for 
                        transferability) to the next-issued publicly 
                        issued Treasury obligations having 2-year, 5-
                        year, and 10-year maturities.
                            ``(iii) Discontinuance of issuance of 
                        obligations.--If the Department of the Treasury 
                        discontinues issuing to the public obligations 
                        having 2-year, 5-year, or 10-year maturities, 
                        the principal of any maturing eligible 
                        obligation shall be reinvested substantially 
                        equally in eligible obligations that are 
                        identical (except for transferability) to the 
                        next-issued publicly issued Treasury 
                        obligations of the maturities longer than 1 
                        year then available.
                    ``(D) Investment of interest account.--
                            ``(i) Before full capitalization.--Until 
                        the date on which the Fund is fully 
                        capitalized, amounts in the interest account of 
                        the Fund shall be invested in eligible 
                        obligations that are identical (except for 
                        transferability) to publicly issued Treasury 
                        obligations that have maturities that coincide, 
                        to the maximum extent practicable, with the 
                        date on which the Fund is expected to be fully 
                        capitalized.
                            ``(ii) After full capitalization.--On and 
                        after the date on which the Fund is fully 
                        capitalized, amounts in the interest account of 
                        the Fund shall be invested and reinvested in 
                        eligible obligations having the shortest 
                        maturity then available until the amounts are 
                        withdrawn and transferred to fund the 
                        activities authorized under subsection (d)(3).
                    ``(E) Par purchase price.--The price to be paid for 
                eligible obligations purchased as investments of the 
                principal account shall not exceed the par value of the 
                obligations so that the amount of the principal account 
                shall be preserved in perpetuity.
                    ``(F) Highest yield.--Among eligible obligations 
                having the same maturity and purchase price, the 
                obligation to be purchased shall be the obligation 
                having the highest yield.
                    ``(G) Holding to maturity.--Eligible obligations 
                purchased shall generally be held to their maturities.
            ``(3) Annual review of investment activities.--Not less 
        frequently than once each calendar year, the Secretary of the 
        Treasury shall review with the State of South Dakota the 
        results of the investment activities and financial status of 
        the Fund during the preceding 12-month period.
            ``(4) Audits.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The activities of the State of 
                South Dakota (referred to in this subsection as the 
                `State') in carrying out the plan of the State for 
                terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration under section 
                602(a) shall be audited as part of the annual audit 
                that the State is required to prepare under the Office 
                of Management and Budget Circular A-133 (or a successor 
                circulation).
                    ``(B) Determination by auditors.--An auditor that 
                conducts an audit under subparagraph (A) shall--
                            ``(i) determine whether funds received by 
                        the State under this section during the period 
                        covered by the audit were used to carry out the 
                        plan of the State in accordance with this 
                        section; and
                            ``(ii) include the determination under 
                        clause (i) in the written findings of the 
                        audit.
            ``(5) Modification of investment requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--If the Secretary of the Treasury 
                determines that meeting the requirements under 
                paragraph (2) with respect to the investment of a Fund 
                is not practicable, or would result in adverse 
                consequences for the Fund, the Secretary shall modify 
                the requirements, as the Secretary determines to be 
                necessary.
                    ``(B) Consultation.--Before modifying a requirement 
                under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of the Treasury 
                shall consult with the State regarding the proposed 
                modification.'';
            (2) in subsection (d)(2) by inserting ``of the Treasury'' 
        after ``Secretary''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:
    ``(f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury to pay expenses 
associated with investing the Fund and auditing the uses of amounts 
withdrawn from the Fund--
            ``(1) $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 and 2007; and
            ``(2) such sums as are necessary for each subsequent fiscal 
        year.''.
    (c) Investment Provisions for the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and 
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Trust Funds.--Section 604 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 389; 114 Stat. 2665) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:
    ``(c) Investments.--
            ``(1) Eligible obligations.--Notwithstanding any other 
        provision of law, the Secretary of the Treasury shall invest 
        the amounts deposited under subsection (b) and the interest 
        earned on those amounts only in interest-bearing obligations of 
        the United States issued directly to the Funds.
            ``(2) Investment requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury 
                shall invest the amounts in each of the Funds in 
                accordance with the requirements of this paragraph.
                    ``(B) Separate investments of principal and 
                interest.--
                            ``(i) Principal account.--The amounts 
                        deposited in each Fund under subsection (b) 
                        shall be credited to an account within the Fund 
                        (referred to in this paragraph as the 
                        `principal account') and invested as provided 
                        in subparagraph (C).
                            ``(ii) Interest account.--The interest 
                        earned from investing amounts in the principal 
                        account of each Fund shall be transferred to a 
                        separate account within the Fund (referred to 
                        in this paragraph as the `interest account') 
                        and invested as provided in subparagraph (D).
                            ``(iii) Crediting.--The interest earned 
                        from investing amounts in the interest account 
                        of each Fund shall be credited to the interest 
                        account.
                    ``(C) Investment of principal account.--
                            ``(i) Initial investment.--Each amount 
                        deposited in the principal account of each Fund 
                        shall be invested initially in eligible 
                        obligations having the shortest maturity then 
                        available until the date on which the amount is 
                        divided into 3 substantially equal portions and 
                        those portions are invested in eligible 
                        obligations that are identical (except for 
                        transferability) to the next-issued publicly 
                        issued Treasury obligations having a 2-year 
                        maturity, a 5-year maturity, and a 10-year 
                        maturity, respectively.
                            ``(ii) Subsequent investment.--As each 2-
                        year, 5-year, and 10-year eligible obligation 
                        matures, the principal of the maturing eligible 
                        obligation shall also be invested initially in 
                        the shortest-maturity eligible obligation then 
                        available until the principal is reinvested 
                        substantially equally in the eligible 
                        obligations that are identical (except for 
                        transferability) to the next-issued publicly 
                        issued Treasury obligations having 2-year, 5-
                        year, and 10-year maturities.
                            ``(iii) Discontinuation of issuance of 
                        obligations.--If the Department of the Treasury 
                        discontinues issuing to the public obligations 
                        having 2-year, 5-year, or 10-year maturities, 
                        the principal of any maturing eligible 
                        obligation shall be reinvested substantially 
                        equally in eligible obligations that are 
                        identical (except for transferability) to the 
                        next-issued publicly issued Treasury 
                        obligations of the maturities longer than 1 
                        year then available.
                    ``(D) Investment of the interest account.--
                            ``(i) Before full capitalization.--Until 
                        the date on which each Fund is fully 
                        capitalized, amounts in the interest account of 
                        the Fund shall be invested in eligible 
                        obligations that are identical (except for 
                        transferability) to publicly issued Treasury 
                        obligations that have maturities that coincide, 
                        to the maximum extent practicable, with the 
                        date on which the Fund is expected to be fully 
                        capitalized.
                            ``(ii) After full capitalization.--On and 
                        after the date on which each Fund is fully 
                        capitalized, amounts in the interest account of 
                        the Fund shall be invested and reinvested in 
                        eligible obligations having the shortest 
                        maturity then available until the amounts are 
                        withdrawn and transferred to fund the 
                        activities authorized under subsection (d)(3).
                    ``(E) Par purchase price.--The price to be paid for 
                eligible obligations purchased as investments of the 
                principal account shall not exceed the par value of the 
                obligations so that the amount of the principal account 
                shall be preserved in perpetuity.
                    ``(F) Highest yield.--Among eligible obligations 
                having the same maturity and purchase price, the 
                obligation to be purchased shall be the obligation 
                having the highest yield.
                    ``(G) Holding to maturity.--Eligible obligations 
                purchased shall generally be held to their maturities.
            ``(3) Annual review of investment activities.--Not less 
        frequently than once each calendar year, the Secretary of the 
        Treasury shall review with the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and 
        the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe (referred to in this subsection as 
        the `Tribes') the results of the investment activities and 
        financial status of the Funds during the preceding 12-month 
        period.
            ``(4) Audits.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The activities of the Tribes in 
                carrying out the plans of the Tribes for terrestrial 
                wildlife habitat restoration under section 602(a) shall 
                be audited as part of the annual audit that the Tribes 
                are required to prepare under the Office of Management 
                and Budget Circular A-133 (or a successor circulation).
                    ``(B) Determination by auditors.--An auditor that 
                conducts an audit under subparagraph (A) shall--
                            ``(i) determine whether funds received by 
                        the Tribes under this section during the period 
                        covered by the audit were used to carry out the 
                        plan of the appropriate Tribe in accordance 
                        with this section; and
                            ``(ii) include the determination under 
                        clause (i) in the written findings of the 
                        audit.
            ``(5) Modification of investment requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--If the Secretary of the Treasury 
                determines that meeting the requirements under 
                paragraph (2) with respect to the investment of a Fund 
                is not practicable, or would result in adverse 
                consequences for the Fund, the Secretary shall modify 
                the requirements, as the Secretary determines to be 
                necessary.
                    ``(B) Consultation.--Before modifying a requirement 
                under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of the Treasury 
                shall consult with the Tribes regarding the proposed 
                modification.''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:
    ``(f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury to pay expenses 
associated with investing the Funds and auditing the uses of amounts 
withdrawn from the Funds--
            ``(1) $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 and 2007; and
            ``(2) such sums as are necessary for each subsequent fiscal 
        year.''.

SEC. 5113. EAST TENNESSEE.

    (a) East Tennessee Defined.--In this section, the term ``East 
Tennessee'' means the counties of Blount, Knox, Loudon, McMinn, Monroe, 
and Sevier, Tennessee.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
East Tennessee.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in East Tennessee, including projects for wastewater treatment 
and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
environmental restoration, and surface water resource protection and 
development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement entered into 
        under this subsection shall provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the effective 
                long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal 
                interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the project 
                cost under each partnership agreement entered into 
                under this subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal 
                share may be in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
                project costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The non-Federal interests 
                shall receive credit for the reasonable cost of design 
                work on a project completed by the non-Federal interest 
                before entering into a partnership agreement with the 
                Secretary for such project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of a project that is 
                the subject of an agreement under this section, the 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of the project cost.
                    (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project cost (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
                project cost.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
undertaken under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section at 
Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 5114. FRITZ LANDING, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall--
            (1) conduct a study of the Fritz Landing Agricultural Spur 
        Levee, Tennessee, to determine the extent of levee 
        modifications that would be required to make the levee and 
        associated drainage structures consistent with Federal 
        standards;
            (2) design and construct such modifications; and
            (3) after completion of such modifications, incorporate the 
        levee into the project for flood control, Mississippi River and 
        Tributaries, authorized by the Act entitled ``An Act for the 
        control of floods on the Mississippi River and its tributaries, 
        and for other purposes'', approved May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 534-
        539), commonly known as the ``Flood Control Act of 1928''.

SEC. 5115. J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall plan, design, and construct a trail system at 
the J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Tennessee, authorized by section 
4 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain 
public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other 
purposes'', approved June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), and adjacent public 
property, including design and construction of support facilities. In 
carrying out such improvements, the Secretary is authorized to use 
funds made available by the State of Tennessee from any Federal or 
State source, or both.

SEC. 5116. TOWN CREEK, LENOIR CITY, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall design and construct the project for flood 
damage reduction designated as Alternative 4 in the Town Creek, Lenoir 
City, Loudon County, Tennessee, feasibility report of the Nashville 
district engineer, dated November 2000, under the authority of section 
205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), notwithstanding 
section 1 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701a; 49 
Stat. 1570). The non-Federal share of the cost of the project shall be 
subject to section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)).

SEC. 5117. TENNESSEE RIVER PARTNERSHIP.

    (a) In General.--As part of the operation and maintenance of the 
project for navigation, Tennessee River, Tennessee, Alabama, 
Mississippi, and Kentucky, authorized by the first section of the River 
and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 927), the Secretary may enter 
into a partnership with a nonprofit entity to remove debris from the 
Tennessee River in the vicinity of Knoxville, Tennessee, by providing a 
vessel to such entity, at Federal expense, for such debris removal 
purposes.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $500,000.

SEC. 5118. UPPER MISSISSIPPI EMBAYMENT, TENNESSEE, ARKANSAS, AND 
              MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary may participate with non-Federal and nonprofit 
entities to address issues concerning managing groundwater as a 
sustainable resource through the Upper Mississippi Embayment, 
Tennessee, Arkansas, and Mississippi, and coordinating the protection 
of groundwater supply and groundwater quality with local surface water 
protection programs. There is authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 
to carry out this section.

SEC. 5119. BOSQUE RIVER WATERSHED, TEXAS.

    (a) Comprehensive Plan.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
appropriate Federal, State, and local entities, shall develop, as 
expeditiously as practicable, a comprehensive plan for development of 
new technologies and innovative approaches for restoring, preserving, 
and protecting the Bosque River watershed within Bosque, Hamilton, 
McLennan, and Erath Counties, Texas. The Secretary, in cooperation with 
the Secretary of Agriculture, may carry out activities identified in 
the comprehensive plan to demonstrate practicable alternatives for 
stabilization and enhancement of land and water resources in the basin.
    (b) Services of Public Non-Profit Institutions and Other 
Entities.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary may utilize, 
through contracts or other means, the services of public non-profit 
institutions and such other entities as the Secretary considers 
appropriate.
    (c) Non-Federal Share.--
            (1) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of activities carried out under this 
        section the cost of planning, design, and construction work 
        completed by or on behalf of the non-Federal interests for 
        implementation of measures constructed with assistance provided 
        under this section. The amount of such credit shall not exceed 
        the non-Federal share of the cost of such activities.
            (2) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        the cost of operation and maintenance for measures constructed 
        with assistance provided under this section shall be 100 
        percent.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.

SEC. 5120. DALLAS COUNTY REGION, TEXAS.

    (a) Dallas County Region Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Dallas County region'' means the city of Dallas, and the 
municipalities of DeSoto, Duncanville, Lancaster, Wilmer, Hutchins, 
Balch Springs, Cedar Hill, Glenn Heights, and Ferris, Texas.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the Dallas County region.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in the Dallas County region, including projects for wastewater 
treatment and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
environmental restoration, and surface water resource protection and 
development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement entered into 
        under this subsection shall provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the effective 
                long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal 
                interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the project 
                costs under each partnership agreement entered into 
                under this subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal 
                share may be in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
                project costs.
                    (B) Credit for work.--The non-Federal interests 
                shall receive credit for the reasonable cost of design 
                work on a project completed by the non-Federal interest 
                before entering into a partnership agreement with the 
                Secretary for such project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of a project that is 
                the subject of an agreement under this section, the 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of the project's costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but such credit may not exceed 25 
                percent of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
undertaken under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section at 
Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 5121. DALLAS FLOODWAY, DALLAS TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Trinity River and 
tributaries, Texas, authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled, ``An 
Act authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation of certain 
public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved 
March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 18), is modified to--
            (1) direct the Secretary to review the Balanced Vision Plan 
        for the Trinity River Corridor, Dallas, Texas, dated December 
        2003 and amended in March 2004, prepared by the non-Federal 
        interest for the project;
            (2) direct the Secretary to review the Interior Levee 
        Drainage Study Phase-I report, Dallas, Texas, dated September 
        2006, prepared by the non-Federal interest; and
            (3) if the Secretary determines that the project is 
        technically sound and environmentally acceptable, authorize the 
        Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of 
        $459,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $298,000,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $161,000,000.
    (b) Credit.--
            (1) In-kind contributions.--The Secretary shall credit 
        toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
        cost of planning, design, and construction work carried out by 
        the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
        agreement for the project if the Secretary determines that the 
        work is integral to the project.
            (2) Cash contributions.--The Secretary shall accept funds 
        provided by the non-Federal interest for use in carrying out 
        planning, engineering, and design for the project. The Federal 
        share of such planning, engineering, and design carried out 
        with non-Federal contributions shall be credited against the 
        non-Federal share of the cost of the project.

SEC. 5122. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--Section 575(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3789; 113 Stat. 311) is amended by inserting 
before the period at the end the following: ``, whether or not such 
works or actions are partially funded under the hazard mitigation grant 
program of the Federal Emergency Management Agency''.
    (b) Specific Projects.--Section 575(b) of such Act (110 Stat. 3789; 
113 Stat. 311) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3) by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (4) by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding the following:
            ``(5) the project for flood control, Upper White Oak Bayou, 
        Texas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4125).''.

SEC. 5123. JOHNSON CREEK, ARLINGTON, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
environmental restoration, and recreation, Johnson Creek, Arlington, 
Texas, authorized by section 101(b)(14) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat 280), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project substantially in accordance with the 
report entitled ``Johnson Creek: A Vision of Conservation'', dated 
March 30, 2006, at a total cost of $80,000,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $52,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$28,000,000, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--
            (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
        project may be provided in cash or in the form of in-kind 
        services or materials.
            (2) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of planning, 
        design, and construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
        interest for implementation of the project, if the Secretary 
        determines that the work is integral to the project.
    (c) Special Rule.--In evaluating and implementing the project, the 
Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184).
    (d) Conforming Amendment.--Section 134 of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2263) is repealed.

SEC. 5124. ONION CREEK, TEXAS.

    In carrying out the study for the project for flood damage 
reduction, recreation, and ecosystem restoration, Onion Creek, Texas, 
the Secretary shall include the costs and benefits associated with the 
relocation of flood-prone residences in the study area for the project 
in the period beginning 2 years before the date of initiation of the 
study and ending on the date of execution of the partnership agreement 
for construction of the project to the extent the Secretary determines 
such relocations are compatible with the project. The Secretary shall 
credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost 
of relocation of such flood-prone residences incurred by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the relocation of such 
residences is integral to the project.

SEC. 5125. EASTERN SHORE AND SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 219(f)(10) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$20,000,000 for water supply and 
        wastewater infrastructure'' and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) In general.--$20,000,000 for water supply, 
                wastewater infrastructure, and environmental 
                restoration'';
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward 
                the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
                cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
                before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
                integral to the project.''; and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph 
        (A) (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with 
        subparagraph (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).

SEC. 5126. DYKE MARSH, FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall accept funds from the National Park Service to 
restore Dyke Marsh, Fairfax County, Virginia.

SEC. 5127. BAKER BAY AND ILWACO HARBOR, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of increased siltation in Baker 
Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington, to determine if the siltation is the 
result of a Federal navigation project (including diverted flows from 
the Columbia River) and, if the Secretary determines that the siltation 
is the result of a Federal navigation project, the Secretary shall 
carry out a project to mitigate the siltation as part of maintenance of 
the Federal navigation project.

SEC. 5128. HAMILTON ISLAND CAMPGROUND, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary is authorized to plan, design, and construct a 
campground for Bonneville Lock and Dam at Hamilton Island (also know as 
``Strawberry Island'') in Skamania County, Washington.

SEC. 5129. PUGET ISLAND, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary is directed to place dredged and other suitable 
material along portions of the Columbia River shoreline of Puget 
Island, Washington, between river miles 38 to 47 in order to protect 
economic and environmental resources in the area from further erosion, 
at a Federal cost of $1,000,000. This action shall be coordinated with 
appropriate resource agencies and comply with applicable Federal laws.

SEC. 5130. WILLAPA BAY, WASHINGTON.

    Section 545 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2675) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ``may construct'' and 
        inserting ``shall construct''; and
            (2) by inserting ``and ecosystem restoration'' after 
        ``erosion protection'' each place it appears.

SEC. 5131. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL.

    (a) Cheat and Tygart River Basins, West Virginia.--Section 
581(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3790; 113 Stat. 313) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``flood control measures'' and inserting 
        ``structural and nonstructural flood control, streambank 
        protection, stormwater management, and channel clearing and 
        modification measures''; and
            (2) by inserting ``with respect to measures that 
        incorporate levees or floodwalls'' before the semicolon.
    (b) Priority Communities.--Section 581(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3791) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (5);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (6) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) Etna, Pennsylvania, in the Pine Creek watershed; and
            ``(8) Millvale, Pennsylvania, in the Girty's Run River 
        basin.''.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 581(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3791) is amended by 
striking ``$12,000,000'' and inserting ``$90,000,000''.

SEC. 5132. CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 571 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 371) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``Nicholas,''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Gilmer,'';
            (2) in subsection (h) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$20,000,000''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), a non-Federal 
interest may include for any project undertaken under this section a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    ``(j) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Ten percent of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section at 
Federal expense.''.

SEC. 5133. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    (a) Corps of Engineers.--Section 340 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856; 113 Stat. 320) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Corps of Engineers.--Ten percent of the amounts appropriated 
to carry out this section may be used by the Corps of Engineers 
district offices to administer projects under this section at Federal 
expense.''.
    (b) Southern West Virginia Defined.--Section 340(f) of such Act is 
amended by inserting ``Nicholas,'' after ``Greenbrier,''.
    (c) Nonprofit Entities.--Section 340 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856) is further amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), a non-Federal 
interest may include for any project undertaken under this section a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.''.

SEC. 5134. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
              INTERESTS.

    Section 211(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 701b-13) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(12) Perris, california.--The project for flood control, 
        Perris, California.
            ``(13) Thornton reservoir, cook county, illinois.--An 
        element of the project for flood control, Chicagoland Underflow 
        Plan, Illinois.
            ``(14) Larose to golden meadow, louisiana.--The project for 
        flood control, Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.
            ``(15) Buffalo bayou, texas.--A project for flood control, 
        Buffalo Bayou, Texas, to provide an alternative to the project 
        authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor Act of 
        June 20, 1938 (52 Stat. 804) and modified by section 3a of the 
        Flood Control Act of August 11, 1939 (53 Stat. 1414).
            ``(16) Halls bayou, texas.--A project for flood control, 
        Halls Bayou, Texas, to provide an alternative to the project 
        for flood control, Buffalo Bayou and tributaries, Texas, 
        authorized by section 101(a)(21) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610).''.

SEC. 5135. WAGE SURVEYS.

    Employees of the United States Army Corps of Engineers who are paid 
wages determined under the last undesignated paragraph under the 
heading ``Administrative Provisions'' of chapter V of the Supplemental 
Appropriations Act, 1982 (5 U.S.C. 5343 note; 96 Stat. 832) shall be 
allowed, through appropriate employee organization representatives, to 
participate in wage surveys under such paragraph to the same extent as 
are prevailing rate employees under subsection (c)(2) of section 5343 
of title 5, United States Code. Nothing in such section 5343 shall be 
considered to affect which agencies are to be surveyed under such 
paragraph.

SEC. 5136. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS.

    Section 219(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335-337; 114 Stat. 2763A-220-221) is amended--
            (1) by striking the undesignated paragraph relating to 
        Charleston, South Carolina, and inserting the following:
            ``(72) Charleston, south carolina.--$10,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, including wastewater collection 
        systems, and stormwater system improvements, Charleston, South 
        Carolina.'';
            (2) by redesignating the paragraph (71) relating to Placer 
        and El Dorado Counties, California, as paragraph (73);
            (3) by redesignating the paragraph (72) relating to Lassen, 
        Plumas, Butte, Sierra, and Nevada Counties, California, as 
        paragraph (74);
            (4) by striking the paragraph (71) relating to 
        Indianapolis, Indiana, and inserting the following:
            ``(75) Indianapolis, indiana.--$6,430,000 for environmental 
        infrastructure for Indianapolis, Indiana.'';
            (5) by redesignating the paragraph (73) relating to St. 
        Croix Falls, Wisconsin, as paragraph (76); and
            (6) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(77) St. clair county, alabama.--$5,000,000 for water 
        related infrastructure, St. Clair County, Alabama.
            ``(78) Crawford county, arkansas.--$35,000,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure, Crawford County, Arkansas.
            ``(79) Alameda and contra costa counties, california.--
        $25,000,000 for recycled water treatment facilities within the 
        East Bay Municipal Utility District service area, Alameda and 
        Contra Costa Counties, California.
            ``(80) Arcadia, sierra madre, and upland, california.--
        $33,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, Arcadia, 
        Sierra Madre, and Upland, California, including $13,000,000 for 
        stormwater infrastructure for Upland, California.
            ``(81) Big bear area regional wastewater agency, 
        california.--$15,000,000 for water reclamation and 
        distribution, Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Agency, 
        California.
            ``(82) Brawley colonia, imperial county, california.--
        $1,400,000 for water infrastructure to improve water quality in 
        the Brawley Colonia Water District, Imperial County, 
        California.
            ``(83) Contra costa water district, california.--
        $23,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure for the 
        Contra Costa Water District, California.
            ``(84) East bay, san francisco, and santa clara areas, 
        california.--$4,000,000 for a desalination project to serve the 
        East Bay, San Francisco, and Santa Clara areas, California.
            ``(85) Imperial county, california.--$10,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, including a wastewater disinfection 
        facility and polishing system, to improve water quality in the 
        vicinity of Calexico, California, on the southern New River, 
        Imperial County, California.
            ``(86) Los angeles county, california.--$3,000,000 for 
        wastewater and water related infrastructure, Diamond Bar, La 
        Habra Heights, and Rowland Heights, Los Angeles County, 
        California.
            ``(87) New river, california.--$10,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure to improve water quality in the New River, 
        California.
            ``(88) Orange county, california.--$15,000,000 for 
        wastewater and water related infrastructure, Anaheim, Brea, La 
        Habra, Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa Margarita, and Yorba Linda, 
        Orange County, California.
            ``(89) San bernardino county, california.--$9,000,000 for 
        wastewater and water related infrastructure, Chino and Chino 
        Hills, San Bernardino County, California.
            ``(90) Santa clara county, california.--$5,500,000 for an 
        advanced recycling water treatment plant in Santa Clara County, 
        California.
            ``(91) Southern los angeles county, california.--
        $15,000,000 for environmental infrastructure for the 
        groundwater basin optimization pipeline, Southern Los Angeles 
        County, California.
            ``(92) Stockton, california.--$33,000,000 for water 
        treatment and distribution infrastructure, Stockton, 
        California.
            ``(93) Sweetwater reservoir, san diego county, 
        california.--$375,000 to improve water quality, and remove 
        nonnative aquatic species from the Sweetwater Reservoir, San 
        Diego County, California.
            ``(94) Whittier, california.--$8,000,000 for water, 
        wastewater, and water related infrastructure, Whittier, 
        California.
            ``(95) Montezuma and la plata counties, colorado.--
        $1,000,000 for water and wastewater related infrastructure for 
        the Ute Mountain project, Montezuma and La Plata Counties, 
        Colorado.
            ``(96) Otero, bent, crowley, kiowa, and prowers counties, 
        colorado.--$35,000,000 for water transmission infrastructure, 
        Otero, Bent, Crowley, Kiowa, and Prowers Counties, Colorado.
            ``(97) Pueblo and otero counties, colorado.--$34,000,000 
        for water transmission infrastructure, Pueblo and Otero 
        Counties, Colorado.
            ``(98) Ledyard and montville, connecticut.--$7,113,000 for 
        water infrastructure, Ledyard and Montville, Connecticut.
            ``(99) Anacostia river, district of columbia and 
        maryland.--$20,000,000 for environmental infrastructure and 
        resource protection and development to enhance water quality 
        and living resources in the Anacostia River watershed, District 
        of Columbia and Maryland.
            ``(100) Washington, district of columbia.--$35,000,000 for 
        implementation of a combined sewer overflow long-term control 
        plan, Washington, District of Columbia.
            ``(101) Charlotte county, florida.--$3,000,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure, Charlotte County, Florida.
            ``(102) Charlotte, lee, and collier counties, florida.--
        $20,000,000 for water supply interconnectivity infrastructure, 
        Charlotte, Lee, and Collier Counties, Florida.
            ``(103) Collier county, florida.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure to improve water quality in the vicinity of the 
        Gordon River, Collier County, Florida.
            ``(104) Jacksonville, florida.--$25,000,000 for wastewater 
        related infrastructure, including septic tank replacements, 
        Jacksonville, Florida.
            ``(105) Sarasota county, florida.--$10,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure in Sarasota County, Florida.
            ``(106) South seminole and north orange county, florida.--
        $30,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure for the South 
        Seminole and North Orange Wastewater Transmission Authority, 
        Florida.
            ``(107) Fayetteville, grantville, lagrange, pine mountain 
        (harris county), douglasville, and carrollton, georgia.--
        $24,500,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
        Fayetteville, Grantville, LaGrange, Pine Mountain (Harris 
        County), Douglasville, and Carrollton, Georgia.
            ``(108) Meriwether and spalding counties, georgia.--
        $7,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, Meriwether 
        and Spalding Counties, Georgia.
            ``(109) North vernon and butlerville, indiana.--$1,700,000 
        for wastewater infrastructure, North Vernon and Butlerville, 
        Indiana.
            ``(110) Salem, washington county, indiana.--$3,200,000 for 
        water supply infrastructure, Salem, Washington County, Indiana.
            ``(111) Central kentucky.--$10,000,000 for water related 
        infrastructure and resource protection and development, Scott, 
        Franklin, Woodford, Anderson, Fayette, Mercer, Jessamine, 
        Boyle, Lincoln, Garrard, Madison, Estill, Powell, Clark, 
        Montgomery, and Bourbon Counties, Kentucky.
            ``(112) Plaquemine, louisiana.--$7,000,000 for sanitary 
        sewer and wastewater infrastructure, Plaquemine, Louisiana.
            ``(113) Shreveport, louisiana.--$20,000,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure in Shreveport, Louisiana.
            ``(114) Central iron range sanitary sewer district, 
        minnesota.--$12,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure for the 
        Central Iron Range Sanitary Sewer District to serve the cities 
        of Hibbing, Chisholm, Buhl, and Kinney, and Balkan and Great 
        Scott Townships, Minnesota.
            ``(115) Grand rapids, minnesota.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Grand Rapids, Minnesota.
            ``(116) City of biloxi, city of gulfport, and harrison 
        county, mississippi.--$15,000,000 for water and wastewater 
        related infrastructure, city of Biloxi, city of Gulfport, and 
        Harrison County, Mississippi.
            ``(117) Jackson, mississippi.--$25,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, Jackson, Mississippi.
            ``(118) Clark county, nevada.--$30,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Clark County, Nevada.
            ``(119) Henderson, nevada.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Henderson, Nevada.
            ``(120) Paterson, new jersey.--$35,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Paterson, New Jersey.
            ``(121) Ellicottville, new york.--$2,000,000 for water 
        supply, water, and wastewater infrastructure in Ellicottville, 
        New York.
            ``(122) Sennett, new york.--$1,500,000 for water 
        infrastructure, Town of Sennett, New York.
            ``(123) Wellsville, new york.--$2,000,000 for water supply, 
        water, and wastewater infrastructure in Wellsville, New York.
            ``(124) Springport and fleming, new york.--$10,000,000 for 
        water related infrastructure, including water mains, pump 
        stations, and water storage tanks, Springport and Fleming, New 
        York.
            ``(125) Cabarrus county, north carolina.--$4,500,000 for 
        water related infrastructure, Cabarrus County, North Carolina.
            ``(126) Charlotte, north carolina.--$11,000,000 for phase 
        II of the Briar Creek wastewater project, Charlotte, North 
        Carolina.
            ``(127) Richmond county, north carolina.--$13,500,000 for 
        water related infrastructure, Richmond County, North Carolina.
            ``(128) Union county, north carolina.--$6,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Union County, North Carolina.
            ``(129) Saipan, northern mariana islands.--$20,000,000 for 
        water related infrastructure, Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands.
            ``(130) Lake county, ohio.--$1,500,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Lake County, Ohio.
            ``(131) Mentor-on-lake, ohio.--$625,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, Mentor-on-Lake, Ohio.
            ``(132) Willowick, ohio.--$665,000 for water and wastewater 
        infrastructure, Willowick, Ohio.
            ``(133) Albany, oregon.--$35,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure to improve habitat restoration, Albany, Oregon.
            ``(134) Borough of stockerton, borough of tatamy, and 
        palmer township, pennsylvania.--$10,000,000 for stormwater 
        control measures, particularly to address sinkholes, in the 
        vicinity of the Borough of Stockerton, the Borough of Tatamy, 
        and Palmer Township, Pennsylvania.
            ``(135) Hatfield borough, pennsylvania.--$310,000 for 
        wastewater related infrastructure for Hatfield Borough, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(136) Lehigh county, pennsylvania.--$5,000,000 for 
        stormwater control measures and storm sewer improvements, 
        Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
            ``(137) North wales borough, pennsylvania.--$1,516,584 for 
        wastewater related infrastructure for North Wales Borough, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(138) Pen argyl, pennsylvania.--$5,250,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania.
            ``(139) Philadelphia, pennsylvania.--$1,600,000 for 
        wastewater related infrastructure for Philadelphia, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(140) Vera cruz, pennsylvania.--$5,500,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Vera Cruz, Pennsylvania.
            ``(141) Commonwealth of puerto rico.--$35,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure in the Commonwealth of Puerto 
        Rico.
            ``(142) Charleston, south carolina.--$1,000,000 for 
        stormwater control measures and storm sewer improvements, 
        Spring Street/Fishburne Street drainage project, Charleston, 
        South Carolina.
            ``(143) Crooked creek, marlboro county, south carolina.--
        $25,000,000 for a project for water storage and water supply 
        infrastructure on Crooked Creek, Marlboro County, South 
        Carolina.
            ``(144) Myrtle beach, south carolina.--$8,000,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure, including ocean outfalls, Myrtle 
        Beach, South Carolina.
            ``(145) North myrtle beach, south carolina.--$8,000,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure, including ocean outfalls, North 
        Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
            ``(146) Surfside, south carolina.--$8,000,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure, including stormwater system 
        improvements and ocean outfalls, Surfside, South Carolina.
            ``(147) Athens, tennessee.--$16,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Athens, Tennessee.
            ``(148) Central texas.--$20,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in Bosque, Brazos, Burleson, Grimes, 
        Hill, Hood, Johnson, Madison, McLennan, Limestone, Robertson, 
        and Somervell Counties, Texas.
            ``(149) El paso county, texas.--$25,000,000 for water 
        related infrastructure and resource protection, including 
        stormwater management, and development, El Paso County, Texas.
            ``(150) Ft. bend county, texas.--$20,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, Ft. Bend County, Texas.
            ``(151) Duchesne, iron, and uintah counties, utah.--
        $10,800,000 for water related infrastructure, Duchesne, Iron, 
        and Uintah Counties, Utah.
            ``(152) Northern west virginia.--$20,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in Hancock, Ohio, Marshall, Wetzel, 
        Tyler, Pleasants, Wood, Doddridge, Monongalia, Marion, 
        Harrison, Taylor, Barbour, Preston, Tucker, Mineral, Grant, 
        Gilmer, Brooke, Ritchie Counties, West Virginia.
            ``(153) United states virgin islands.--$25,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure for the St. Croix Anguilla wastewater 
        treatment plant and the St. Thomas Charlotte Amalie wastewater 
        treatment plant, United States Virgin Islands.
            ``(154) Cheyenne river sioux reservation (dewey and ziebach 
        counties) and perkins and meade counties, south dakota.--
        $25,000,000 for water supply infrastructure for the Cheyenne 
        River Sioux Reservation in Dewey and Ziebach Counties, and for 
        communities in Perkins and Meade Counties, South Dakota.''.

                      TITLE VI--FLORIDA EVERGLADES

SEC. 6001. HILLSBORO AND OKEECHOBEE AQUIFER, FLORIDA.

    (a) Modification.--The project for Hillsboro and Okeechobee 
Aquifer, Florida, authorized by section 101(a)(16) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to carry out the project at a total cost of 
$42,500,000.
    (b) Treatment.--Section 601(b)(2)(A) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2681) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i) by adding at the end the following: ``The 
        project for aquifer storage and recovery, Hillsboro and 
        Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida, authorized by section 101(a)(16) 
        of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276), 
        shall be treated for purposes of this section as being in the 
        Plan, except that operation and maintenance costs of the 
        project shall remain a non-Federal responsibility.''; and
            (2) in clause (iii) by inserting after ``subparagraph (B)'' 
        the following: ``and the project for aquifer storage and 
        recovery, Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer''.

SEC. 6002. PILOT PROJECTS.

    Section 601(b)(2)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2681) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding clause (i)--
                    (A) by striking ``$69,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$71,200,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$34,500,000'' each place it 
                appears and inserting ``$35,600,000''; and
            (2) in clause (i)--
                    (A) by striking ``$6,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$8,200,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$3,000,000'' each place it 
                appears and inserting ``$4,100,000''.

SEC. 6003. INITIAL PROJECTS.

    Section 601(b)(2)(C) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2682) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding clause (i) by striking ``at a 
        total cost of $1,100,918,000'' and all that follows before the 
        colon;
            (2) in clause (iv)--
                    (A) by striking ``$100,335,000'' and inserting 
                ``$162,630,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$50,167,500'' each place it 
                appears and inserting ``$81,315,000'';
            (3) in clause (v)--
                    (A) by striking ``$124,837,000'' and inserting 
                ``$385,010,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$62,418,500'' each place it 
                appears and inserting ``$192,505,000''; and
            (4) in clause (vi)--
                    (A) by striking ``$89,146,000'' and inserting 
                ``$199,340,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$44,573,000'' each place it 
                appears and inserting ``$99,670,000''.

SEC. 6004. MAXIMUM COSTS.

    (a) Maximum Cost of Projects.--Section 601(b)(2)(E) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2683) is amended by 
inserting ``and section (d)'' before the period at the end.
    (b) Maximum Cost of Program Authority.--Section 601(c)(3) of such 
Act (114 Stat. 2684) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) Maximum cost of program authority.--Section 
                902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
                U.S.C. 2280) shall apply to the individual project 
                funding limits in subparagraph (A) and the aggregate 
                cost limits in subparagraph (B).''.

SEC. 6005. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.

    Section 601(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2684) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Project authorization.--The following project for 
        water resources development and conservation and other purposes 
        is authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially 
        in accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, 
        described in the report designated in this paragraph:
                    ``(A) Indian river lagoon south, florida.--The 
                project for ecosystem restoration, water supply, flood 
                damage reduction, and protection of water quality, 
                Indian River Lagoon South, Florida: Report of the Chief 
                of Engineers dated August 6, 2004, at a total cost of 
                $1,365,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $682,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $682,500,000.
                    ``(B) Picayune strand, florida.--The project for 
                environmental restoration, Picayune Strand, Florida: 
                Report of the Chief of Engineers dated September 15, 
                2005, at a total cost of $375,330,000, with an 
                estimated Federal cost of $187,665,000 and an estimated 
                non-Federal cost of $187,665,000.
                    ``(C) Site 1 impoundment, florida.--The project for 
                environmental restoration, Site 1 Impoundment, Florida: 
                Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 
                2006, at a total cost of $80,840,000, with an estimated 
                Federal cost of $40,420,000 and an estimated non-
                Federal cost of $40,420,000.''.

SEC. 6006. CREDIT.

    Section 601(e)(5)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2685) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i)--
                    (A) by striking ``or'' at the end of subclause (I);
                    (B) by adding ``or'' at the end of subclause (II); 
                and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(III) the credit is provided for work 
                        carried out before the date of the partnership 
                        agreement between the Secretary and the non-
                        Federal sponsor, as defined in an agreement 
                        between the Secretary and the non-Federal 
                        sponsor providing for such credit;''; and
            (2) in clause (ii)--
                    (A) by striking ``design agreement or the project 
                cooperation''; and
                    (B) by inserting before the semicolon the 
                following: ``, including in the case of credit provided 
                under clause (i)(III) conditions relating to design and 
                construction''.

SEC. 6007. OUTREACH AND ASSISTANCE.

    Section 601(k) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2691) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Maximum expenditures.--The Secretary may expend up to 
        $3,000,000 per fiscal year for fiscal years beginning after 
        September 30, 2004, to carry out this subsection.''.

SEC. 6008. CRITICAL RESTORATION PROJECTS.

    Section 528(b)(3)(C) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3769; 113 Stat. 286) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i) by striking ``$75,000,000'' and all that 
        follows through ``2003'' and inserting ``$95,000,000''; and
            (2) in clause (ii) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$30,000,000''.

SEC. 6009. MODIFIED WATER DELIVERIES.

    (a) In General.--The project, Modified Water Deliveries to 
Everglades National Park, authorized by section 104 of the Everglades 
National Park Protection and Expansion Act of 1989 (16 U.S.C. 410r-8), 
as described in the General Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact 
Statement for Modified Water Deliveries to Everglades National Park, 
June 1992, is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
project substantially in accordance with the Revised General 
Reevaluation Report/Second Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement 
for the Tamiami Trail Modifications, Modified Water Deliveries to 
Everglades National Park, August 2005, at a total cost of $144,131,000.
    (b) Use of Funds.--Funds made available under section 102(f) of the 
Everglades National Park Protection and Expansion Act of 1989 (16 
U.S.C. 410r-6), may be used to carry out the project modification under 
subsection (a).
    (c) Source and Allocation of Funds.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), 
        Federal costs incurred for construction of the project 
        modification under subsection (a) on or after October 1, 2004, 
        shall be shared equally between the Secretary and the Secretary 
        of the Interior.
            (2) Acceptance and use of funds.--The Secretary may accept 
        and expend funds, without further appropriation, provided from 
        another Federal agency or from non-Federal interests for 
        construction of the project modification under subsection (a) 
        or for carrying out such other work that the Secretary 
        determines to be appropriate and consistent with authorized 
        purposes of the modified project.

SEC. 6010. DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    The following projects are not authorized after the date of 
enactment of this Act:
            (1) The uncompleted portions of the project for the C-44 
        Basin Storage Reservoir of the Comprehensive Everglades 
        Restoration Plan, authorized by section 601(b)(2)(C)(i) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2682), at a 
        total cost of $147,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $73,900,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $73,900,000.
            (2) The uncompleted portions of the Martin County, Florida, 
        modifications to the project for Central and Southern Florida, 
        authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (82 
        Stat. 740), at a total cost of $15,471,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $8,073,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $7,398,000.
            (3) The uncompleted portions of the East Coast Backpumping, 
        St. Lucie-Martin County, Spillway Structure S-311 modifications 
        to the project for Central and Southern Florida, authorized by 
        section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 740), at 
        a total cost of $77,118,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $55,124,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $21,994,000.

SEC. 6011. REGIONAL ENGINEERING MODEL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall complete the development and 
testing of the regional engineering model for environmental restoration 
as expeditiously as practicable.
    (b) Usage.--The Secretary shall consider using, as appropriate, the 
regional engineering model for environmental restoration in the 
development of future water resource projects, including projects 
developed pursuant to section 601 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680).
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out subsection (a).

                   TITLE VII--LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA

SEC. 7001. DEFINITIONS.

    In this title, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Coastal louisiana ecosystem.--The term ``coastal 
        Louisiana ecosystem'' means the coastal area of Louisiana from 
        the Sabine River on the west to the Pearl River on the east, 
        including those parts of the Deltaic Plain and the Chenier 
        Plain included within the study area of the Plan.
            (2) Governor.--The term ``Governor'' means the Governor of 
        the State of Louisiana.
            (3) Plan.--The term ``Plan'' means the report of the Chief 
        of Engineers for ecosystem restoration for the Louisiana 
        Coastal Area dated January 31, 2005.
            (4) Task force.--The term ``Task Force'' means the Coastal 
        Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task Force 
        established by section 7003.

SEC. 7002. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the Governor, 
shall develop a comprehensive plan for protecting, preserving, and 
restoring the coastal Louisiana ecosystem.
    (b) Integration of Plan Into Comprehensive Hurricane Protection 
Study.--In developing the comprehensive plan, the Secretary shall 
integrate the plan into the analysis and design of the comprehensive 
hurricane protection study authorized by title I of the Energy and 
Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103; 119 
Stat. 2247).
    (c) Consistency With Comprehensive Coastal Protection Master 
Plan.--In developing the comprehensive plan, the Secretary shall ensure 
that the plan is consistent with the goals, analysis, and design of the 
comprehensive coastal protection master plan authorized and defined 
pursuant to Act 8 of the First Extraordinary Session of the Louisiana 
State Legislature, 2005, including--
            (1) investigation and study of the maximum effective use of 
        the water and sediment of the Mississippi and Atchafalaya 
        Rivers for coastal restoration purposes consistent with flood 
        control and navigation;
            (2) a schedule for the design and implementation of large-
        scale water and sediment reintroduction projects and an 
        assessment of funding needs from any source; and
            (3) an investigation and assessment of alterations in the 
        operation of the Old River Control Structure, consistent with 
        flood control and navigation purposes.
    (d) Inclusions.--The comprehensive plan shall include a description 
of--
            (1) the framework of a long-term program integrated with 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction, flood damage reduction, 
        and navigation activities that provide for the comprehensive 
        protection, conservation, and restoration of the wetlands, 
        estuaries (including the Barataria-Terrebonne estuary), barrier 
        islands, shorelines, and related land and features of the 
        coastal Louisiana ecosystem, including protection of critical 
        resources, habitat, and infrastructure from the effects of a 
        coastal storm, a hurricane, erosion, or subsidence;
            (2) the means by which a new technology, or an improved 
        technique, can be integrated into the program referred to in 
        paragraph (1);
            (3) the role of other Federal and State agencies and 
        programs in carrying out such program;
            (4) specific, measurable ecological success criteria by 
        which success of the plan will be measured; and
            (5) proposed projects in order of priority as determined by 
        their respective potential to contribute to--
                    (A) creation of coastal wetlands; and
                    (B) flood protection of communities ranked by 
                population density and level of protection.
    (e) Considerations.--In developing the comprehensive plan, the 
Secretary shall consider the advisability of integrating into the 
program referred to in subsection (d)(1)--
            (1) any related Federal or State project being carried out 
        on the date on which the plan is developed;
            (2) any activity in the Plan; or
            (3) any other project or activity identified in--
                    (A) the Mississippi River and Tributaries program;
                    (B) the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation 
                Plan;
                    (C) the Louisiana Coastal Zone Management Plan; or
                    (D) the plan of the State of Louisiana entitled 
                ``Integrated Ecosystem Restoration and Hurricane 
                Protection--Louisiana's Comprehensive Master Plan for a 
                Sustainable Coast''.
    (f) Reports to Congress.--
            (1) Initial report.--Not later than 1 year after the date 
        of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 
        Congress a report containing the comprehensive plan.
            (2) Updates.--Not later that 5 years after the date of 
        submission of a report under paragraph (1), and at least once 
        every 5 years thereafter until implementation of the 
        comprehensive plan is complete, the Secretary shall submit to 
        Congress a report containing an update of the plan and an 
        assessment of the progress made in implementing the plan.

SEC. 7003. LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a program for 
ecosystem restoration, Louisiana Coastal Area, Louisiana, substantially 
in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, dated January 
31, 2005.
    (b) Priorities.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out the program under 
        subsection (a), the Secretary shall give priority to--
                    (A) any portion of the program identified in the 
                report described in subsection (a) as a critical 
                restoration feature;
                    (B) any Mississippi River diversion project that--
                            (i) will protect a major population area of 
                        the Pontchartain, Pearl, Breton Sound, 
                        Barataria, or Terrebonne basins; and
                            (ii) will produce an environmental benefit 
                        to the coastal Louisiana ecosystem;
                    (C) any barrier island, or barrier shoreline, 
                project that--
                            (i) will be carried out in conjunction with 
                        a Mississippi River diversion project; and
                            (ii) will protect a major population area;
                    (D) any project that will reduce storm surge and 
                prevent or reduce the risk of loss of human life and 
                the risk to public safety; and
                    (E) a project to physically modify the Mississippi 
                River-Gulf outlet and to restore the areas affected by 
                the Mississippi River-Gulf outlet in accordance with 
                the comprehensive plan to be developed under section 
                7002(a), subject to the conditions and recommendations 
                in a final report of the Chief of Engineers.

SEC. 7004. COASTAL LOUISIANA ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION AND RESTORATION TASK 
              FORCE.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established a task force to be known 
as the Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task 
Force (in this section referred to as the ``Task Force'').
    (b) Membership.--The Task Force shall consist of the following 
members (or, in the case of the head of a Federal agency, a designee at 
the level of Assistant Secretary or an equivalent level):
            (1) The Secretary.
            (2) The Secretary of the Interior.
            (3) The Secretary of Commerce.
            (4) The Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
        Agency.
            (5) The Secretary of Agriculture.
            (6) The Secretary of Transportation.
            (7) The Secretary of Energy.
            (8) The Director of the Federal Emergency Management 
        Agency.
            (9) The Commandant of the Coast Guard.
            (10) The Coastal Advisor to the Governor.
            (11) The Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Natural 
        Resources.
            (12) A representative of the Governor's Advisory Commission 
        on Coastal Restoration and Conservation.
    (c) Duties.--The Task Force shall make recommendations to the 
Secretary regarding--
            (1) policies, strategies, plans, programs, projects, and 
        activities for addressing conservation, protection, 
        restoration, and maintenance of the coastal Louisiana 
        ecosystem;
            (2) financial participation by each agency represented on 
        the Task Force in conserving, protecting, restoring, and 
        maintaining the coastal Louisiana ecosystem, including 
        recommendations--
                    (A) that identify funds from current agency 
                missions and budgets; and
                    (B) for coordinating individual agency budget 
                requests; and
            (3) the comprehensive plan to be developed under section 
        7002(a).
    (d) Report.--The Task Force shall submit to Congress a biennial 
report that summarizes the activities of the Task Force.
    (e) Working Groups.--
            (1) General authority.--The Task Force may establish such 
        working groups as the Task Force determines to be necessary to 
        assist the Task Force in carrying out this section.
            (2) Hurricanes katrina and rita.--
                    (A) In general.--The Task Force may establish a 
                working group for the purpose of advising the Task 
                Force of opportunities to integrate the planning, 
                engineering, design, implementation, and performance of 
                Corps of Engineers projects for hurricane and storm 
                damage reduction, flood damage reduction, ecosystem 
                restoration, and navigation in those areas in Louisiana 
                for which a major disaster has been declared by the 
                President as a result of Hurricane Katrina or Rita.
                    (B) Expertise; representation.--In establishing the 
                working group under subparagraph (A), the Task Force 
                shall ensure that the group--
                            (i) has expertise in coastal estuaries, 
                        diversions, coastal restoration and wetlands 
                        protection, ecosystem restoration, hurricane 
                        protection, storm damage reduction systems, 
                        navigation, and ports; and
                            (ii) represents the State of Louisiana and 
                        local governments in south Louisiana.
    (f) Compensation.--Members of the Task Force and members of a 
working group established by the Task Force may not receive 
compensation for their services as members of the Task Force or working 
group, as the case may be.
    (g) Travel Expenses.--Travel expenses incurred by members of the 
Task Force and members of a working group established by the Task 
Force, in the performance of their service on the Task Force or working 
group, as the case may be, shall be paid by the agency or entity that 
the member represents.
    (h) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the Task Force or any working group 
established by the Task Force.

SEC. 7005. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS.

    (a) Review.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the non-Federal 
interest of the project involved, shall review each Federally-
authorized water resources project in the coastal Louisiana ecosystem 
being carried out or completed as of the date of enactment of this Act 
to determine whether the project needs to be modified--
            (1) under the program authorized by section 7003; or
            (2) to contribute to ecosystem restoration under section 
        7003.
    (b) Modifications.--Subject to subsections (c) and (d), the 
Secretary may carry out the modifications described in subsection (a).
    (c) Public Notice and Comment.--Before completing the report 
required under subsection (d), the Secretary shall provide an 
opportunity for public notice and comment.
    (d) Report.--
            (1) In general.--Before modifying an operation or feature 
        of a project under subsection (b), the Secretary shall submit 
        to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
        House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
        Public Works of the Senate a report describing the 
        modification.
            (2) Inclusion.--A report describing a modification under 
        paragraph (1) shall include such information relating to the 
        timeline for and cost of the modification, as the Secretary 
        determines to be relevant.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.

SEC. 7006. CONSTRUCTION.

    (a) Science and Technology.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out a coastal 
        Louisiana ecosystem program substantially in accordance with 
        the Plan, at a total cost of $100,000,000.
            (2) Purposes.--The purposes of the program under paragraph 
        (1) shall be--
                    (A) to identify any uncertainty relating to the 
                physical, chemical, geological, biological, and 
                cultural baseline conditions in coastal Louisiana 
                ecosystem;
                    (B) to improve knowledge of the physical, chemical, 
                geological, biological, and cultural baseline 
                conditions in coastal Louisiana ecosystem; and
                    (C) to identify and develop technologies, models, 
                and methods to carry out this subsection.
            (3) Working groups.--The Secretary may establish such 
        working groups as the Secretary determines to be necessary to 
        assist the Secretary in carrying out this subsection.
            (4) Contracts and cooperative agreements.--In carrying out 
        this subsection, the Secretary may enter into a contract or 
        cooperative agreement with an individual or entity (including a 
        consortium of academic institutions in Louisiana) with 
        scientific or engineering expertise in the restoration of 
        aquatic and marine ecosystems for coastal restoration and 
        enhancement through science and technology.
            (5) Applicability of the federal advisory committee act.--A 
        working group established under this subsection shall not be 
        considered to be an advisory committee under the Federal 
        Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).
    (b) Demonstration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary 
        may carry out demonstration projects substantially in 
        accordance with the Plan and within the coastal Louisiana 
        ecosystem for the purpose of resolving critical areas of 
        scientific or technological uncertainty related to the 
        implementation of the comprehensive plan to be developed under 
        section 7002(a).
            (2) Maximum cost.--
                    (A) Total cost.--The total cost for planning, 
                design, and construction of all projects under this 
                subsection shall not exceed $100,000,000.
                    (B) Individual project.--The total cost of an 
                individual project under this subsection shall not 
                exceed $25,000,000.
    (c) Initial Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out 
        the following projects substantially in accordance with the 
        Plan:
                    (A) Mississippi River Gulf Outlet environmental 
                restoration at a total cost of $105,300,000.
                    (B) Small diversion at Hope Canal at a total cost 
                of $68,600,000.
                    (C) Barataria basin barrier shoreline restoration 
                at a total cost of $242,600,000.
                    (D) Small Bayou Lafourche reintroduction at a total 
                cost of $133,500,000.
                    (E) Medium diversion at Myrtle Grove with dedicated 
                dredging at a total cost of $278,300,000.
            (2) Modifications.--
                    (A) In general.--In carrying out each project under 
                paragraph (1), the Secretary shall carry out such 
                modifications as may be necessary to the ecosystem 
                restoration features identified in the Plan to address 
                the impacts of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on the areas 
                of the project.
                    (B) Integration.--The Secretary shall ensure that 
                each modification under subparagraph (A) is taken into 
                account in conducting the study of comprehensive 
                hurricane protection authorized by title I of the 
                Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 
                (119 Stat. 2247).
            (3) Construction reports.--Before the Secretary may begin 
        construction of any project under this subsection, the 
        Secretary shall submit a report documenting any modifications 
        to the project, including cost changes, to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate.
            (4) Applicability of other provisions.--Notwithstanding 
        section 902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
        U.S.C. 2280), the cost of a project described in paragraph (1) 
        and any modifications to the project shall not exceed 150 
        percent of the cost of such project set forth in paragraph (1).
    (d) Beneficial Use of Dredged Material.--The Secretary, 
substantially in accordance with the Plan, shall implement in the 
coastal Louisiana ecosystem a program for the beneficial use of 
material dredged from federally maintained waterways at a total cost of 
$100,000,000.
    (e) Additional Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out a 
        project for ecosystem restoration for the Chenier Plain, 
        Louisiana, and the following projects referred to in the Plan 
        if the Secretary determines such projects are feasible:
                    (A) Land Bridge between Caillou Lake and the Gulf 
                of Mexico at a total cost of $56,300,000.
                    (B) Gulf Shoreline at Point Au Fer Island at a 
                total cost of $43,400,000.
                    (C) Modification of Caernarvon Diversion at a total 
                cost of $20,700,000.
                    (D) Modification of Davis Pond Diversion at a total 
                cost of $64,200,000.
            (2) Reports.--Not later than December 31, 2009, the 
        Secretary shall submit feasibility reports on the projects 
        described in paragraph (1) to the Committee on Transportation 
        and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate.
            (3) Construction.--No appropriations shall be made to 
        construct any project under this subsection if the report under 
        paragraph (2) has not been approved by resolutions adopted by 
        the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
        of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate.

SEC. 7007. NON-FEDERAL COST SHARE.

    (a) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of a study or project under this title the cost of 
work carried out in the coastal Louisiana ecosystem by the non-Federal 
interest before the date of the execution of the partnership agreement 
for the study or project if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the study or project.
    (b) Sources of Funds.--The non-Federal interest may use, and the 
Secretary shall accept, funds provided under any other Federal program 
to satisfy, in whole or in part, the non-Federal share of the 
construction of any project carried out under this title if such funds 
are authorized to be used to carry out such project.
    (c) Treatment of Credit Between Projects.--Any credit provided 
under this section toward the non-Federal share of the cost of a study 
or project under this title may be applied toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of any other study or project under this title.
    (d) Periodic Monitoring.--
            (1) In general.--To ensure that the contributions of the 
        non-Federal interest equal the non-Federal share of the cost of 
        a study or project under this title during each 5-year period 
        beginning after the date of commencement of the first study or 
        project under this title, the Secretary shall--
                    (A) monitor for each study or project under this 
                title the non-Federal provision of cash, in-kind 
                services and materials, and land, easements, rights-of-
                way, relocations, and disposal areas; and
                    (B) manage the requirement of the non-Federal 
                interest to provide for each such study or project 
                cash, in-kind services and materials, and land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and disposal 
                areas.
            (2) Other monitoring.--The Secretary shall conduct 
        monitoring separately for the study phase, construction phase, 
        preconstruction engineering and design phase, and planning 
        phase for each project authorized on or after date of enactment 
        of this Act for all or any portion of the coastal Louisiana 
        ecosystem.
    (e) Audits.--Credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, 
relocations, and disposal areas (including land value and incidental 
costs) provided under this section, and the cost of work provided under 
this section, shall be subject to audit by the Secretary.

SEC. 7008. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 209 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2) or any other provision of law, in 
carrying out any project or activity under this title or any other 
provision of law to protect, conserve, and restore the coastal 
Louisiana ecosystem, the Secretary may determine that--
            (1) the project or activity is justified by the 
        environmental benefits derived by the coastal Louisiana 
        ecosystem; and
            (2) no further economic justification for the project or 
        activity is required if the Secretary determines that the 
        project or activity is cost effective.
    (b) Limitation on Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to 
any separable element of a project intended to produce benefits that 
are predominantly unrelated to the protection, preservation, and 
restoration of the coastal Louisiana ecosystem.

SEC. 7009. INDEPENDENT REVIEW.

    The Secretary shall establish the Louisiana Water Resources Council 
which shall serve as the exclusive peer review panel for projects under 
this title as required by section 2037 of this Act.

SEC. 7010. EXPEDITED REPORTS.

    The Secretary shall expedite completion of the reports for the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
justified in the completed report, proceed directly to project 
preconstruction engineering and design:
            (1) The projects identified in the study of comprehensive 
        hurricane protection authorized by title I of the Energy and 
        Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2447).
            (2) A project for ecosystem restoration for the Chenier 
        Plain, Louisiana.
            (3) The project for Multipurpose Operation of Houma 
        Navigation Lock.
            (4) The project for Terrebonne Basin Barrier Shoreline 
        Restoration.
            (5) The project for Small Diversion at Convent/Blind River.
            (6) The project for Amite River Diversion Canal 
        Modification.
            (7) The project for Medium Diversion at White's Ditch.
            (8) The project to convey Atchafalaya River Water to 
        Northern Terrebonne Marshes.
            (9) The projects identified in the Southwest Coastal 
        Louisiana hurricane and storm damage reduction study authorized 
        by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
        House of Representatives on December 7, 2005.

SEC. 7011. REPORTING.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 6 years after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report 
including a description of--
            (1) the projects authorized and undertaken under this 
        title;
            (2) the construction status of the projects;
            (3) the cost to date and the expected final cost of each 
        project undertaken under this title; and
            (4) the benefits and environmental impacts of the projects.
    (b) External Review.--The Secretary shall enter into a contract 
with the National Academy of Sciences under which the National Academy 
of Sciences shall perform and submit to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate an external review of the 
demonstration program authorized by subsection 7006(b).

SEC. 7012. NEW ORLEANS AND VICINITY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to--
            (1) raise levee heights where necessary and otherwise 
        enhance the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Project and the 
        West Bank and Vicinity Project to provide the levels of 
        protection necessary to achieve the certification required for 
        participation in the national flood insurance program under the 
        National Flood Insurance Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 2001 et seq.);
            (2) modify the 17th Street, Orleans Avenue, and London 
        Avenue drainage canals and install pumps and closure structures 
        at or near the lakefront at Lake Pontchartrain;
            (3) armor critical elements of the New Orleans hurricane 
        and storm damage reduction system;
            (4) modify the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to increase 
        the reliability of the flood protection system for the city of 
        New Orleans;
            (5) replace or modify certain non-Federal levees in 
        Plaquemines Parish to incorporate the levees into the New 
        Orleans to Venice Hurricane Protection Project;
            (6) reinforce or replace flood walls in the existing Lake 
        Pontchartrain and Vicinity Project and the existing West Bank 
        and Vicinity Project to improve performance of the flood and 
        storm damage reduction systems;
            (7) perform one time stormproofing of interior pump 
        stations to ensure the operability of the stations during 
        hurricanes, storms, and high water events;
            (8) repair, replace, modify and improve non-Federal levees 
        and associated protection measures in Terrebonne Parish; and
            (9) reduce the risk of storm damage to the greater New 
        Orleans metropolitan area by restoring the surrounding wetlands 
        through measures to begin to reverse wetland losses in areas 
        affected by navigation, oil and gas, and other channels and 
        through modification of the Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion 
        structure or its operations.
    (b) Funding Authority.--Activities authorized by subsection (a) and 
section 7013 shall be carried out in a manner that is consistent with 
the cost-sharing requirements specified in the Emergency Supplemental 
Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane 
Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109-234).
    (c) Conditions.--The Secretary shall notify the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate if 
estimates for the expenditure of funds on any single project or 
activity identified in subsection (a) exceeds the amount specified for 
that project or activity in the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations 
Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 
(Public Law 109-234). No appropriation in excess of 25 percent above 
the amount specified for a project or activity in such Act shall be 
made until an increase in the level of expenditure has been approved by 
resolutions adopted by the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate.

SEC. 7013. MISSISSIPPI RIVER GULF OUTLET.

    (a) Deauthorization.--
            (1) In general.--The navigation channel portion of the 
        project for navigation, Mississippi River-Gulf outlet, 
        authorized by the Act entitled, ``An Act to authorize 
        construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf outlet'', approved 
        March 29, 1956 (70 Stat. 65), as modified by section 844 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4177), and 
        further modified by section 326 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3717), which extends from 
        the Gulf of Mexico to mile 60 at the southern bank of the Gulf 
        Intracoastal Waterway is not authorized.
            (2) Scope.--Paragraph (1) shall not be construed to modify 
        or deauthorize the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Replacement 
        Project, authorized by the Act referred to in paragraph (1).
    (b) Plan for Closure and Restoration.--The Secretary shall carry 
out a study and implement a project to physically modify the 
Mississippi River-Gulf outlet and to restore the areas affected by the 
Mississippi River-Gulf outlet in accordance with the plan to be 
developed under section 7002(a), subject to the conditions and 
recommendations in a final report of the Chief of Engineers if a 
favorable report of the Chief is completed not later than 180 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act. The plan shall incorporate the 
recommendations of the Interim Mississippi River Gulf Outlet Deep-Draft 
De-Authorization Report submitted to Congress in December 2006.
    (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on 
the project described in subsection (b).
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $5,000,000 for the costs of carrying out the study and 
developing the report of the Chief of Engineers required by subsection 
(b). Such costs shall be a Federal expense.

   TITLE VIII--UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATER-WAY SYSTEM

SEC. 8001. DEFINITIONS.

    In this title, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Plan.--The term ``Plan'' means the project for 
        navigation and ecosystem improvements for the Upper Mississippi 
        River and Illinois Waterway System: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated December 15, 2004.
            (2) Upper mississippi river and illinois waterway system.--
        The term ``Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway 
        System'' means the projects for navigation and ecosystem 
        restoration authorized by Congress for--
                    (A) the segment of the Mississippi River from the 
                confluence with the Ohio River, River Mile 0.0, to 
                Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock in Minneapolis-St. Paul, 
                Minnesota, River Mile 854.0; and
                    (B) the Illinois Waterway from its confluence with 
                the Mississippi River at Grafton, Illinois, River Mile 
                0.0, to T.J. O'Brien Lock in Chicago, Illinois, River 
                Mile 327.0.

SEC. 8002. NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS AND RESTORATION.

    Except as modified by this title, the Secretary shall undertake 
navigation improvements and restoration of the ecosystem for the Upper 
Mississippi River and Illinois Water System substantially in accordance 
with the Plan and subject to the conditions described therein.

SEC. 8003. AUTHORIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION OF NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS.

    (a) Small Scale and Nonstructural Measures.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall--
                    (A) construct mooring facilities at Locks 12, 14, 
                18, 20, 22, 24, and LaGrange Lock or other alternative 
                locations that are economically and environmentally 
                feasible;
                    (B) provide switchboats at Locks 20 through 25; and
                    (C) conduct development and testing of an 
                appointment scheduling system.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--The total cost of 
        projects authorized under this subsection shall be 
        $235,000,000. Such costs are to be paid \1/2\ from amounts 
        appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ 
        from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 
        Such sums shall remain available until expended.
    (b) New Locks.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall construct new 1,200-
        foot locks at Locks 20, 21, 22, 24, and 25 on the Upper 
        Mississippi River and at LaGrange Lock and Peoria Lock on the 
        Illinois Waterway.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--The total cost of 
        projects authorized under this subsection shall be 
        $1,795,000,000. Such costs are to be paid \1/2\ from amounts 
        appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ 
        from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 
        Such sums shall remain available until expended.
    (c) Concurrence.--The mitigation required for the projects 
authorized under subsections (a) and (b), including any acquisition of 
lands or interests in lands, shall be undertaken or acquired 
concurrently with lands and interests in lands for the projects 
authorized under subsections (a) and (b), and physical construction 
required for the purposes of mitigation shall be undertaken 
concurrently with the physical construction of such projects.

SEC. 8004. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Operation.--To ensure the environmental sustainability of the 
existing Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway System, the 
Secretary shall modify, consistent with requirements to avoid adverse 
effects on navigation, the operation of the Upper Mississippi River and 
Illinois Waterway System to address the cumulative environmental 
impacts of operation of the system and improve the ecological integrity 
of the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois River.
    (b) Ecosystem Restoration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out, consistent 
        with requirements to avoid adverse effects on navigation, 
        ecosystem restoration projects to attain and maintain the 
        sustainability of the ecosystem of the Upper Mississippi River 
        and Illinois River in accordance with the general framework 
        outlined in the Plan.
            (2) Projects included.--Ecosystem restoration projects may 
        include--
                    (A) island building;
                    (B) construction of fish passages;
                    (C) floodplain restoration;
                    (D) water level management (including water 
                drawdown);
                    (E) backwater restoration;
                    (F) side channel restoration;
                    (G) wing dam and dike restoration and modification;
                    (H) island and shoreline protection;
                    (I) topographical diversity;
                    (J) dam point control;
                    (K) use of dredged material for environmental 
                purposes;
                    (L) tributary confluence restoration;
                    (M) spillway, dam, and levee modification to 
                benefit the environment; and
                    (N) land and easement acquisition.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--Except as provided in 
                subparagraphs (B) and (C), the Federal share of the 
                cost of carrying out an ecosystem restoration project 
                under this subsection shall be 65 percent.
                    (B) Exception for certain restoration projects.--In 
                the case of a project under this section for ecosystem 
                restoration, the Federal share of the cost of carrying 
                out the project shall be 100 percent if the project--
                            (i) is located below the ordinary high 
                        water mark or in a connected backwater;
                            (ii) modifies the operation of structures 
                        for navigation; or
                            (iii) is located on federally owned land.
                    (C) Savings clause.--Nothing in this subsection 
                affects the applicability of section 906(e) of the 
                Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
                2283(e)).
                    (D) Nongovernmental organizations.--Notwithstanding 
                section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
                1962d-5b), for any project carried out under this 
                title, a non-Federal sponsor may include a nonprofit 
                entity, with the consent of the affected local 
                government.
            (4) Land acquisition.--The Secretary may acquire land or an 
        interest in land for an ecosystem restoration project from a 
        willing seller through conveyance of--
                    (A) fee title to the land; or
                    (B) a flood plain conservation easement.
    (c) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall carry out a long term resource 
monitoring, computerized data inventory and analysis, and applied 
research program for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois River to 
determine trends in ecosystem health, to understand systemic changes, 
and to help identify restoration needs. The program shall adopt and 
continue the monitoring program established under section 
1103(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 652(e)(1)(A)(ii)).
    (d) Ecosystem Restoration Preconstruction Engineering and Design.--
            (1) Restoration design.--Before initiating the construction 
        of any individual ecosystem restoration project, the Secretary 
        shall--
                    (A) establish ecosystem restoration goals and 
                identify specific performance measures designed to 
                demonstrate ecosystem restoration;
                    (B) establish the without-project condition or 
                baseline for each performance indicator; and
                    (C) for each separable element of the ecosystem 
                restoration, identify specific target goals for each 
                performance indicator.
            (2) Outcomes.--Performance measures identified under 
        paragraph (1)(A) shall include specific measurable 
        environmental outcomes, such as changes in water quality, 
        hydrology, or the well-being of indicator species the 
        population and distribution of which are representative of the 
        abundance and diversity of ecosystem-dependent aquatic and 
        terrestrial species.
            (3) Restoration design.--Restoration design carried out as 
        part of ecosystem restoration shall include a monitoring plan 
        for the performance measures identified under paragraph (1)(A), 
        including--
                    (A) a timeline to achieve the identified target 
                goals; and
                    (B) a timeline for the demonstration of project 
                completion.
    (e) Consultation and Funding Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out the environmental 
        sustainability, ecosystem restoration, and monitoring 
        activities authorized in this section, the Secretary shall 
        consult with the Secretary of the Interior and the States of 
        Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin.
            (2) Funding agreements.--The Secretary is authorized to 
        enter into agreements with the Secretary of the Interior, the 
        Upper Mississippi River Basin Association, and natural resource 
        and conservation agencies of the States of Illinois, Iowa, 
        Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin to provide for the direct 
        participation of and transfer of funds to such entities for the 
        planning, implementation, and evaluation of projects and 
        programs established by this section.
    (f) Specific Projects Authorization.--
            (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated to 
        carry out this subsection $1,580,000,000, of which not more 
        than $226,000,000 shall be available for projects described in 
        subsection (b)(2)(B) and not more than $43,000,000 shall be 
        available for projects described in subsection (b)(2)(J). Such 
        sums shall remain available until expended.
            (2) Limitation on available funds.--Of the amounts made 
        available under paragraph (1), not more than $35,000,000 in any 
        fiscal year may be used for land acquisition under subsection 
        (b)(4).
            (3) Individual project limit.--Other than for projects 
        described in subparagraphs (B) and (J) of subsection (b)(2), 
        the total cost of any single project carried out under this 
        subsection shall not exceed $25,000,000.
            (4) Monitoring.--In addition to amounts authorized under 
        paragraph (1), there are authorized $10,420,000 per fiscal year 
        to carry out the monitoring program under subsection (c) if 
        such sums are not appropriated pursuant to section 1103(e)(4) 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        652(e)(4)).
    (g) Implementation Reports.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than June 30, 2008, and every 4 
        years thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee 
        on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee 
        on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives an implementation report that--
                    (A) includes baselines, milestones, goals, and 
                priorities for ecosystem restoration projects; and
                    (B) measures the progress in meeting the goals.
            (2) Advisory panel.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall appoint and 
                convene an advisory panel to provide independent 
                guidance in the development of each implementation 
                report under paragraph (1).
                    (B) Panel members.--Panel members shall include--
                            (i) one representative of each of the State 
                        resource agencies (or a designee of the 
                        Governor of the State) from each of the States 
                        of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and 
                        Wisconsin;
                            (ii) one representative of the Department 
                        of Agriculture;
                            (iii) one representative of the Department 
                        of Transportation;
                            (iv) one representative of the United 
                        States Geological Survey;
                            (v) one representative of the United States 
                        Fish and Wildlife Service;
                            (vi) one representative of the 
                        Environmental Protection Agency;
                            (vii) one representative of affected 
                        landowners;
                            (viii) two representatives of conservation 
                        and environmental advocacy groups; and
                            (ix) two representatives of agriculture and 
                        industry advocacy groups.
                    (C) Chairperson.--The Secretary shall serve as 
                chairperson of the advisory panel.
                    (D) Application of federal advisory committee 
                act.--The Advisory Panel and any working group 
                established by the Advisory Panel shall not be 
                considered an advisory committee under the Federal 
                Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).
    (h) Ranking System.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        Advisory Panel, shall develop a system to rank proposed 
        projects.
            (2) Priority.--The ranking system shall give greater weight 
        to projects that restore natural river processes, including 
        those projects listed in subsection (b)(2).

SEC. 8005. COMPARABLE PROGRESS.

    (a) In General.--As the Secretary conducts pre-engineering, design, 
and construction for projects authorized under this title, the 
Secretary shall--
            (1) select appropriate milestones;
            (2) determine, at the time of such selection, whether the 
        projects are being carried out at comparable rates; and
            (3) make an annual report to Congress, beginning in fiscal 
        year 2008, regarding whether the projects are being carried out 
        at a comparable rate.
    (b) No Comparable Rate.--If the Secretary or Congress determines 
under subsection (a)(2) that projects authorized under this title are 
not moving toward completion at a comparable rate, annual funding 
requests for the projects shall be adjusted to ensure that the projects 
move toward completion at a comparable rate in the future.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 19, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1495

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.
```