alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 807 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the Medicare 

outpatient rehabilitation therapy caps, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2017 

Mr. PAULSEN (for himself, Mr. KIND, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. 

MEEHAN, Ms. DELBENE, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. 

ELLISON, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. CICILLINE, Mrs. COMSTOCK, Ms. 

JENKINS of Kansas, Mr. STEWART, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. CARTER of Georgia, Ms. MICHELLE

LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. BARLETTA, Mrs. 

NAPOLITANO, Mr. FOSTER, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. 

SWALWELL of California, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. FRANKEL of Florida, Ms. 

BROWNLEY of California, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. POCAN, Mrs. WAGNER, Mr. 

HECK, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Mr. MARINO, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, 

Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. COSTELLO of Pennsylvania, Mr. WILSON of South 

Carolina, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. LOWENTHAL, and Mr. POLIQUIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal 

the Medicare outpatient rehabilitation therapy caps, and 

for other purposes. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 807 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Access to 

5 Rehabilitation Services Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OUTPATIENT THERAPY CAP REPEAL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1833 of the Social Secu8 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l) is amended by striking sub9 section (g). 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) shall apply to services furnished after the 

12 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, November 16, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, November 16, 2010, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Marisa Knispel. For more information, please contact Ms. Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: October 4, 2010.

Shawn F. Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. 2010-25477 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 785 

To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to form, 

join, or assist labor organizations, or to refrain from such activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2017 

Mr. KING of Iowa (for himself and Mr. WILSON of South Carolina) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

the Workforce 

A BILL 

To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to form, join, or assist labor organizations, or to 

refrain from such activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Right-to5 Work Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL LABOR RELA7 TIONS ACT. 

8 (a) Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act 

9 (the ‘‘Act’’) (29 U.S.C. 157) is amended by striking ‘‘exVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:55 Feb 07, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H785.IH H785

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 785 IH

1 cept to’’ and all that follows through ‘‘authorized in sec2 tion 8(a)(3)’’. 

3 (b) Section 8(a) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 158(a)) is 

4 amended by striking ‘‘: Provided, That’’ and all that fol5 lows through ‘‘retaining membership’’ in paragraph (3). 

6 (c) Section 8(b) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 158(b)) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘or to discriminate’’ and all that fol8 lows through ‘‘retaining membership’’ in paragraph (2) 

9 and by striking ‘‘covered by an agreement authorized 

10 under subsection (a)(3) of this section’’ in paragraph (5). 

11 (d) Section 8(f) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 158(f)) is 

12 amended by striking clause (2) and by redesignating 

13 clauses (3) and (4) as (2) and (3), respectively. 

14 SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT. 

15 Section 2 of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 152) 

16 is amended by striking paragraph Eleventh. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases B Subcommittee, October 20, 2010, 5 p.m. to October 22, 2010, 5 p.m., Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 15, 2010, 75 FR 56117.                 

The meeting has been changed to October 20, 2010, 5 p.m. to October 21, 2010, 5 p.m. The location remains the same. The meeting is partially closed to the public. 

Dated: September 30, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2010-25175 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: January 28, 2016 106988 

________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

NEW YORK,

Respondent,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CAMERON BARNHILL,

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: December 15, 2015

Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Rose and Devine, JJ.

__________

Lisa A. Burgess, Indian Lake, for appellant.

Kathleen B. Hogan, District Attorney, Lake George (Emilee

B. Davenport of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Devine, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Warren County

(Hall Jr., J.), rendered January 8, 2014, convicting defendant

upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a

controlled substance in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant

pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance

in the third degree and purportedly waived his right to appeal. 

Consistent with the plea agreement, County Court sentenced

defendant, a second felony offender, to 41⁄2 years in prison to be

followed by three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant

appeals, and we affirm.
-2- 106988 

Initially, we find that defendant's waiver of appeal was

not valid. During the plea allocution, County Court failed to

adequately explain the nature of the right to appeal or the

consequences of waiving that right, and a written waiver executed

by defendant is not included in the record before us (see People

v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248,

256 [2006]; cf. People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]). As

defendant's understanding of the waiver is not "evident on the

face of the record," it is not valid (People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at

256).

Defendant's argument that the agreed-upon sentence is harsh

or excessive is properly before us as a result (see id. at 255-

256); nevertheless, we reject it. The record reflects that

defendant's guilty plea was accepted only after two psychiatrists

conducted CPL article 730 examinations, concluding that he was

not incapacitated. In agreeing to a sentence that greatly

reduced defendant's potential sentencing exposure under the

indictment, County Court took into consideration his mental

health and substance abuse problems (see People v Eggsware, 90

AD3d 1231, 1234 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 923 [2012]). Given

defendant's serious criminal history, we do not find that the

sentence imposed constituted an abuse of discretion or that

extraordinary circumstances are present so as to warrant a

reduction in the sentence (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]; People v

Crump, 107 AD3d 1046, 1047 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1014

[2013]).

Peters, P.J., Garry and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
ex10-2.htm


    Exhibit
10.2

     

    FORM
OF WAIVER

    


    In
consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of the participation
of my employer, First
Bancorp, in the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital
Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the United States
or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required
to comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as
published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008.

    


    I
acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation,
bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements
(including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer
or in which I participate as they relate to the period the United States holds
any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital
Purchase Program.

    


    This
waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any
state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation,
including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other payments I
would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation
was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these
regulations on my employment relationship.

    


    


    


    
      
        	
                By:

              	 
      
	
                Name:

              	 
      
	
                Title:

              	 
      
	
                Date:
Order entered September 30 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 01539
- CR
DEVANTE JEROME FOSTE R, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 14
- 31115
- R



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On September 21, 2016, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the appellant’s brief had not been filed. We ADO PT the September 27, 2016 findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by counsel Riann Moore of the Appellate Division of the Dallas County Public Defender’s Office who has not abandoned the appeal; and (3) counsel gave no explanation for the delay but requested thirty additional days to file the brief. We ORDER appellant to file his brief no later than October 31,
2016.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Graphics, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Joe R. Davis, Chairman of the Board of Directors andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

# (1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

# (2)                                  Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | Dated: February 1, 2006                                         |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
|   | /s/ Joe  R. Davis                                               |   |
|   | Joe  R. Davis                                                   |
|   | Chairman  of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer |
|        |                                                                 |  |  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000921381
<NAME>                        JOTAN, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U. S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          1,180,178
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   9,888,049
<ALLOWANCES>                    728,620
<INVENTORY>                     7,052,975
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                19,150,397
<PP&E>                          5,768,706
<DEPRECIATION>                  1,081,568
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  27,822,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           22,368,863
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           12,932,747
<PREFERRED>                     14,357
<COMMON>                        56,966
<OTHER-SE>                      (37,007,671)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    27,822,383
<SALES>                         15,861,484
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                15,861,484
<CGS>                           11,129,653
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   11,129,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                5,058,965
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              (1,054,725)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (1,381,859)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (1,381,859)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (1,381,859)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.31)
        


</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 768 

To require the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique 

ZIP code for Miami Lakes, Florida. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2017 

Mr. DIAZ-BALART introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To require the United States Postal Service to designate 

a single, unique ZIP code for Miami Lakes, Florida. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ZIP CODE FOR MIAMI LAKES, FLORIDA. 

4 Not later than September 30, 2017, the United 

5 States Postal Service shall designate a single, unique ZIP 

6 code for, as nearly as practicable, for Miami Lakes, Flor7 ida. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      357,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (694,164)
<INVENTORY>                                        375,939
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,149,435
<PP&E>                                           8,388,652
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,338,065)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,758,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,103,315
<BONDS>                                          3,750,693
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           155,550
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,748,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,758,006
<SALES>                                          2,211,760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,211,760
<CGS>                                            1,965,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,170,551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 348,243
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,272,434)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,272,434)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,272,434)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      ($0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      ($0.08)
        

</TABLE>
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

April 29, 2011

Mr. Laurence W. Watts

Watts & Associates, P.C.

P.O. Box 2214

Missouri City, TX 77459

Mr. Steven L. Wiggins

Jefferson County District Attorney Office

1001 Pearl Street, 3rd Floor

Beaumont, TX 77701

RE:Case Number:  09-0326

Court of Appeals Number:  09-08-00420-CV

Trial Court Number:  D-177,131

Style:LARRY ROCCAFORTE

v.

JEFFERSON COUNTY

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion in the above-referenced cause.  You may obtain a copy of the opinion at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/recent.asp.  If you would like the opinion by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@txcourts.gov or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 09-0326Page 1**
#### Jeremiah BRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D10-5187.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 14, 2011.

Jeremiah Bray, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Rule 3.800(a) motion. Appellant’s motion did not establish that the face of the record showed that his life sentence as habitual violent felony offender was illegal. To the extent appellant sought the extraordinary relief granted in *Johnson v. State,*9 So.3d 640 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), and *Stephens v. State,*974 So.2d 455 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), appellant was sentenced as a habitual *violent*felony offender. The sentencing provisions pertaining to habitual violent felony offenders, section 775.084(4)(b), Florida Statutes, never contained the anomalous “shall” that was the subject of *Burdick v. State,*594 So.2d 267 (Fla.1992), and which formed the basis for the manifest injustice found in *Johnson*and *Stephens.*The sentencing court was not misled by the statute in effect at the time of the offense into believing that a life sentence was mandatory in appellant’s case. *See*§ 775.084(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997).

*Affirmed.*

STEVENSON, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.
(logo) ncb 

National Cooperative Bank

 

2011 Crystal Drive

Suite, 800

Arlington, VA 22202

 

 

# February 6, 2018

 

RBSCommercial Funding, Inc. as Depositor

600Washington Blvd.

Stamford,CT 06901

 

RE:     Annual Statement as to Compliance

           WFRBS 2014 C21

 

DearSir/Madam:

 

In accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreemententered into in connection with the issuance of the Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C21, as an authorized officer of NationalCooperative Bank, N.A., formerly NCB, FSB (the “NCB Master Servicer”), I herebycertify pursuant to Section 11.12 thereof that:

 

a.      A reviewof the activities of the NCB Master Servicer during the preceding calendar year(the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.     To thebest of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer hasfulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

Pleasenote that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover onor before March 31, 2018.

 

 

Bestregards,

/s/Karyn Mann

KarynMann

SeniorVice President, Investor Compliance

NationalCooperative Bank, N.A.
Order entered February 21, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00065-CV

JERRY, MARSHA AND JASON CHAMBERS, Appellants

V.

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 87353-422

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ February 18, 2014 “motion to file 5 page jurisdictional brief 

with statement of case” and ORDER the jurisdictional brief tendered to the Clerk on February 

18, 2014 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE