alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,452
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,734
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (65)
<INVENTORY>                                     31,734
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,421
<PP&E>                                          15,534
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,349
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           132
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,878
<SALES>                                        135,549
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               139,549
<CGS>                                           82,847
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,862
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,945
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,917
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,917
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 15

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C.  10549


RE:  PDS Financial Corporation 
     Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-85966)
     

We are aware that our report dated April 22, 1998 on our reviews of interim 
financial information of PDS Financial Corporation for the period ended 
March 31, 1998 and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-QSB 
for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 is incorporated by reference in this 
registration statement.  Pursuant to Rule 436 (c) under the Securities Act of 
1933, this report should not be considered a part of the registration 
statement prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 
of that Act.
                              

Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
May 13, 1998





                                      14
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule  Contains Summary  Financial  Information
Extracted From (a) Item 7 - "Financial  Statements And Supplementary
Data" And Is Qualified In Its Entirety By Reference To Such (b)
Financial  Statements  Included In This Report And Incorporated Herein
By Reference.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                             0000921085
<NAME>                 CENTRAL COAST BANCORP
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                   APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                41,505
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                      22,973
<TRADING-ASSETS>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>          148,056
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       0
<LOANS>                              426,073
<ALLOWANCE>                            7,018
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       648,817
<DEPOSITS>                           583,951
<SHORT-TERM>                               0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                    5,530
<LONG-TERM>                            4,149
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              47,892
<OTHER-SE>                             7,295
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>       648,817
<INTEREST-LOAN>                       10,150
<INTEREST-INVEST>                      2,197
<INTEREST-OTHER>                         271
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                      12,618
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                     4,365
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     4,437
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                  8,181
<LOAN-LOSSES>                            800
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                         0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                        4,336
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        3,676
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>             3,676
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                           2,243
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.31
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                          5.85
<LOANS-NON>                              486
<LOANS-PAST>                             210
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                           0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                       6,136
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              3
<RECOVERIES>                              85
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                      7,018
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                   7,018
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                        0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                    0





</TABLE>
584 A.2d 205

#### GERARD PASTORE, SR. v. COUNTY OF ESSEX.

May 1, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 237 *N.J.Super.*371, 568 A.2d 81)
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0054 SHANDOR S. BADARUDDI N,

Appellant , v. THE STATE OF MONTANA & THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ,

Appellee s . ORDER

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), Appellee the State of Montana is given an extension of time until November 24, 2022 to prepare, file and serve its answer brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court October 11 2022

10/11/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0054
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blyth, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert H. Barghaus,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Robert H. BarghausRobert
      H. BarghausVice
      President and Chief Financial OfficerDecember
      5, 2008






This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the
knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
#### Edward SILVA, Appellant, v. MONARCH SECURITY SERVICES, INC. and Aequicap Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 1D10-2562.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 28, 2010.

Rehearing Denied March 30, 2011.

Jeffrey I. Jacobs of Malea and Jacobs, P.A., South Miami; Jay M. Levy of Jay M. Levy, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Simon Abramovici and H. Michael Mun-iz of the Law Office of Jason Gelinas, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s response to this court’s order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed because the order does not appear to be a final order or a non-final order appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.180, we DISMISS this appeal. *See Life Care Ctr. of Winter Haven v. Benjamin,*22 So.3d 152, 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (dismissing appeal where the JCC reserved jurisdiction on issue central to trial proceedings); *Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck Co.,*693 So.2d 680, 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (stating where the JCC reserves ruling on claim that is ripe for adjudication, order is not yet final or appealable).

PADOVANO, ROBERTS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC.

                                EXHIBIT 11.1

                     COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
            (In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                             Three Months Ended         Nine Months Ended
                                                September 30,             September 30,
                                           ----------------------     ----------------------
                                              1997        1996           1997         1996
                                           ----------  ----------     ----------   ---------
<S>                                        <C>         <C>            <C>          <C>  
Net income before extraordinary item           9,801       3,218         24,446       5,200

Extraordinary item, net of taxes                   -           -             -         (917)

                                           ----------  ----------     ----------   ---------
Net income                                     9,801       3,218         24,446       4,283
                                           ==========  ==========     ==========   =========


Computation of weighted  average
   number of shares outstanding:

     Issued :  15,755,598

     Weighted average shares outstanding  15,646,534  13,622,878     15,583,348   9,890,224

     Add:  Incremental shares applicable
           to stock options based on the
           Treasury Stock method using 
           average market price            1,299,741   1,416,782      1,305,221   1,280,850
                                          ----------- -----------    ----------- -----------

     Weighted average common shares
           and equivalents outstanding    16,946,275  15,039,660     16,888,569  11,171,074
                                          ==========  ==========     ==========  ===========



Earnings per common share and
   equivalent outstanding:

     Income before extraordinary                0.58        0.21           1.45        0.46

     Extraordinary item                            -           -             -        (0.08)
                                           ----------  ----------     ----------   ----------

     Net income                                 0.58        0.21           1.45        0.38
                                           ==========  ==========     ==========   ==========


</TABLE>
585 A.2d 384

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. T.P.

October 2, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 379

#### NEW JERSEY CHAPTER OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INDUSTRIAL AND OFFICE PARKS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.

September 18, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 241 *N.J.Super.*145, 574 A.2d 514.)
#### STATE ex rel. Clinton PERCLE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-0293.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Percle, Clinton; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 04-7665; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 10-KH-885,10-KH-1095.

Denied.
584 A.2d 229

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT SWIONTAK.

May 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Kenny C. BOHANAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOUBLE WALL CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Washington business corporation; Gary P. Murphy, individually and the marital community comprised thereof; Vicki Murphy, individually and the marital community comprised thereof, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99-35052.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 13, 2000.1

Decided Jan. 16, 2001.

*719Kleinfeld, Circuit Judge, concurred in result and filed opinion.

Before FERGUSON, KLEINFELD, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

Bohanan appeals from the district court’s denial of attorneys’ fees under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). The district court determined that the parties had settled all claims, including any claim for attorneys’ fees. Bohanan admitted accepting $1,000 from the defendants and admitted signing a release which covered “any and all claims, liens and or damages pending or in the future.” The district court’s conclusion that the parties had settled was adequately supported by the record.

Settlement agreements are contracts, which a federal court interprets by looking to the contract law of the state in which it sits. *Jeff D. v. Andrus,*899 F.2d 753, 759 (9th Cir.1990). The court’s interpretation of the settlement release was not erroneous. *Chadwick v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.,*33 Wash.App. 297, 654 P.2d 1215, 1217 (Wash.App.1982) (a “release generally extends to all matters within the parties’ contemplation at the time it is executed”).

The fact that the defendants, who were unrepresented at the time, negotiated the settlement directly with Bohanan does not render the settlement unenforceable. *See In re Patterson,*93 WashApp. 579, 969 P.2d 1106 (Wash.App.1999). Bohanan has not alleged any facts that would support a claim of duress or fraud or otherwise justify setting aside the settlement.

AFFIRMED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge,

concurring.

I concur in the result. The district court decision was without prejudice to any claims the attorney might have in his *720own name and on his own behalf in state court, whether against his client, or against the defendants for tortious third party interference with valid contractual relations. *See Calbom v. Knudtzon,*65 Wash.2d 157, 396 P.2d 148, 151 (Wash. 1964).
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2551]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[PUBLIC NOTICE 6894]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition

    Determinations: ``Compass and Rule: Architecture as Mathematical 
Practice in England, 1500-1750''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Compass and Rule: Architecture as 
Mathematical Practice in England, 1500-1750,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Yale Center for British Art, 
New Haven, Connecticut, from on or about February 18, 2010, until on or 
about May 30, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 1, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-2551 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Exhibit 12.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

I, Tzahi Goshen, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Kenon Holdings Ltd.; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|Date:  |  | April 21, 2017         
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Tzahi Goshen       
|Name:  |  | Tzahi Goshen           
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
**AMERICAN REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANDSUBSIDIARIES****REAL ESTATE OWNED AND REVENUESEARNED — (Continued)****Year Ended December 31, 2002 (in $000’s)****EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Keith A. Meister, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) of American Property Investors,Inc., the General Partner of American Real Estate HoldingsLimited Partnership (the “Registrant”), certify thatto the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of theRegistrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the periodended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”):          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934, as amended; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Registrant.     /s/ Keith A. Meister       **Keith A. Meister** **President and Chief Executive Officer of** **American Property Investors, Inc.,** **the General Partner of** **American Real Estate Holdings Limited Partnership**Date: March 31, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6254

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LARRY THOMAS LINDSEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-96-313, CA-97-2653-4-22) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 2, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Thomas Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Larry Thomas Lindsey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Lindsey , Nos. CR-96-313; CA-97-2653-4-22 (D.S.C. Nov. 25, 1997). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2014, by andamong CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as SpecialServicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor, and U.S. BANKNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and Trustee, with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC21 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.08 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
866 A.2d 979

#### IN THE MATTER OF PAUL A. DYKSTRA, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 011191974).

February 23, 2005.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that PAUL A. DYKSTRA of HASBROUCK HEIGHTS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months effective November 1, 2004, by Order of this Court filed October 5, 2004, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Corey MACKEY.

No. 2011-KK-0138.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 18, 2011.

In re Mackey, Corey; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, Nos. 485-697, 475-360; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0076.

Granted.

VICTORY and GUIDRY, JJ, would deny.
585 A.2d 364

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT LEE DENIKE.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
584 A.2d 253

#### MURRELL WATKINS, ET AL. v. RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, ET AL.

June 26, 1990.

Petition for certification granted.