alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7368 

To provide for the compensation of Federal employees furloughed during 

a Government shutdown. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 20, 2018 

Mr. BEYER (for himself, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. SERRANO, Ms. 

NORTON, Mr. KILMER, Mr. PERLMUTTER, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. 

CICILLINE, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. 

LYNCH, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. COOPER, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. VELA, Mr. 

PALLONE, Mrs. DEMINGS, Mr. POCAN, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. SCOTT of 

Virginia, Ms. PINGREE, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. 

BEN RAY LUJA ́N of New Mexico, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. 

MCEACHIN, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. MICHAEL F. DOYLE of Pennsylvania, 

Ms. MOORE, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, Mrs. COMSTOCK, Mr. VISCLOSKY, 

Mr. LAWSON of Florida, Mr. COLE, Mrs. BUSTOS, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. 

COURTNEY, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. VARGAS, Ms. DELAURO, Mrs. WATSON

COLEMAN, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Ms. LOFGREN, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. HOYER, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SIRES, 

Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. DELANEY, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. 

WILSON of Florida, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. 

VEASEY, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. 

COHEN, Mr. COSTA, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. FOSTER, Mr. JONES of 

North Carolina, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. MENG, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. SMITH of Washington, and Ms. PLASKETT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for the compensation of Federal employees 

furloughed during a Government shutdown. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 7368 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Ret5 roactive Pay Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES FUR7 LOUGHED DURING A GOVERNMENT SHUT8 DOWN. 

9 Federal employees furloughed as a result of any lapse 

10 in appropriations that begins on or about December 22, 

11 2018, shall be compensated at their standard rate of com12 pensation, for the period of such lapse in appropriations, 

13 as soon as practicable after such lapse in appropriations 

14 ends. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
03-15-00404-CR

AUSTIN BYROM, 

## § IN THE Appellant 

## § VS. 

## § THIRD COURT 

## § STATE OF TEXAS, 

## § OF APPEALS Appellee APPELLANT’S FIRST MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: Now comes Austin Myles Byrom, Appellant in the above styled and numbered cause, and moves this Court to grant an extension of time to file appellant’s brief, pursuantto Rule 38.6 ofthe Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure, and for good cause shows the following: 1. This case is on appeal from the 207th Judicial District Court ofComal County, Texas. 2. The case belowwas styled the STATE OFTEXAS vs. AUSTIN MYLES BYROM, and numbered CR20 14-130 3. Appellant was convicted ofCapital Murder. 4. Appellant was assessed asentence oflife without parole on 6/17/2015. 5. Notice ofappeal was given on 7/1/2015. 6. The clerk’s record was filed on 10/13/2015; the reporter’s record was filed on 9/14/2015. 7. The appellate briefis due on 11/12/2015. ACCEPTED 03-15-00404-CR 7803560 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/12/2015 2:57:37 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK8. Appellant requests an extension oftime of45 days to December 28, 2015. 9. No prior extensions have been received in this cause. 10. Defendant is currently incarcerated. 11. Appellant relies on the following facts as good cause forthe requested extension: In additionto near daily court settings, and preparation forthree trials set in December, counseljust filed a briefinAlicia Perez v. State of Texas inthis court, No. 03-15-00232-CR onthis date, November 12, 2015. Further, counsel must nextwrite and file a briefinJeffrey Moore v. State ofTexas, No. 03-15-00338-CR due November25, 2015. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this Court grant this First Motion To Extend Time to File Brief, and for such other and further reliefas the Court may deem appropriate. RespectfUlly submitted, Schoon Law Firm, P.C. 200 N. Seguin Avenue New Braunfels, Texas 78130 Tel: (830) 627-0044 Fax: (830) 620-5657 susan@ ö6 awf

. m By c oo’~—~ State Bar No. 24046803 Attorney forAppellantCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on November 12, 2015 a true and correct copy ofthe above and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney’s Office, Comal County, Texas by email to preslj~co

Susan
#### Kevin SANDERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D09-4013.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 22, 2010.

Frances Martinez of Escobar, Ramirez & Associates, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard M. Fishkin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

DAVIS, Judge.

Kevin Sanders challenges his August 31, 2009, judgments and sentences for attempted second-degree murder and conspiracies to commit aggravated battery, aggravated assault, and armed burglary. We affirm his conviction and sentence for attempted second-degree murder without comment. Additionally, we conclude that the trial court did not err in denying Sanders’ motion for judgment of acquittal on the conspiracy charges; however, the State has properly conceded that because the three counts of conspiracy originated from a single agreement, we must reverse Sanders’ convictions and sentences on those three counts and remand the case to the trial court with instructions to enter a judgment for one count of conspiracy. *See Negron Gil de Rubio v. State,*987 So.2d 217, 219 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (“At the heart of any conspiracy is an agreement.... If there is but a single agreement, then there is but a single conspiracy even though it involves the commission of multiple crimes.”).

Our reversal necessarily requires that Sanders be resentenced using a corrected scoresheet. We note that *Negron Gil de Rubio*indicates that the conspiracy offense with the greatest sentence is the count upon which the trial court should enter judgment and sentence. *Id.*We affirm in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

WHATLEY and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT XINHUA LI, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 11-70799 Age n c y No. A088-130-220 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 19, 2013 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TR OTT, a nd THOM AS, C irc uit Judge s. Xinhua Li, a native and c itiz e n

of C hina , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m i gra tion Appe a l s ’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing he r a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing he r a pplic ation for a sy lum

an d withholding of rem ova l . 

# FIL ED DEC 9 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e grant the pe t ition for re vie w a nd we re m and. The B IA de te rm i n e d Li’ s te stim ony wa s not suffic ie ntly pe rsua s ive an d spe c ific to e sta

blish sheunde rwe nt a

forc e d a bortion in C hina , and tha

t she provide d no c orroboration of this c la im . The B IA a lso de te rm ine d Li fa ile d to c orroborate the arre sts ba se d on he r C hristia n re ligion. In re a c hing the se c onc lusions, the

B IA did not ha

ve the be ne fit of our de c ision in Re n v . Holde r , 648 F.3d 1079 (9th C ir. 2011), re ga rding notic e and a

n opportunity

to provide c orroborative e vide n c e . Thus, we grant the pe tition for re v ie w a nd re m and this c a se to the B IA for furthe r proc e e dings c onsiste nt with this disposition. Se e IN S v . Ve ntura , 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (pe r c uriam ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WG RANT E D; RE M ANDE D .

1 1 - 7 0 7 9 9 2
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7263 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to provide notice in the case of 

certain ski area closures, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2018 

Mr. TIPTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to provide notice 

in the case of certain ski area closures, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ski Area and Forest 

5 Emergency Procedures Act of 2018’’ or ‘‘SAFE Act of 

6 2018’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7263 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CLOSE CERTAIN 

2 SKI AREAS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Agriculture may 

4 not close a ski area located in a National Forest unless— 

5 (1) at least 14 days before such closure occurs, 

6 the Secretary of Agriculture— 

7 (A) provides to the general manager of 

8 such ski area or the designated representative 

9 of such manager a notification of— 

10 (i) the intended closure date of such 

11 ski area; 

12 (ii) an explanation for the closure that 

13 includes— 

14 (I) uniform standards developed 

15 by the Secretary to be used across the 

16 National Forest System (as defined in 

17 section 11(a) of the Forest and 

18 Rangeland Renewable Resources 

19 Planning Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 

20 1609(a)); and 

21 (II) a risk assessment for the 

22 spread of fire to such ski area; and 

23 (iii) the opportunity for the general 

24 manager (or designated representative) to 

25 appeal such closure through a meeting 

26 with— 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7263 IH

1 (I) the Forest Supervisor of the 

2 National Forest involved in person; 

3 and 

4 (II) a representative from the of5 fice of the Secretary, Secretary’s rep6 resentative in person or through tele7 phone or other form of remote confer8 encing; and 

9 (B) makes the information described in 

10 clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (A) avail11 able to the public; and 

12 (2) at least 7 days before such closure occurs, 

13 the Secretary of Agriculture— 

14 (A) provides to the general manager of 

15 such ski area a final notice of closure; and 

16 (B) makes such final notice available to 

17 the public. 

18 (b) REQUIREMENT FOR SKI AREA OPERATING

19 PLAN.—The general manager of a ski area located in a 

20 National Forest shall submit to the Secretary of Agri21 culture an operating plan for such ski area that includes 

22 the circumstances under which subsection (a) would not 

23 apply to the closure of such ski area. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
858 A.2d 588

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Edward Bissau MENDY, Respondent.

No. 738 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 14, 2004.

*CORRECTED ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 2004, on certification by the Disciplinary Board that the respondent, EDWARD BISSAU MENDY, who was suspended by Order of this Court dated June 6, 2002, for a period of six months, .has filed a verified statement showing compliance with all the terms and conditions of the Order of Suspension and Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E., and there being no other outstanding order of suspension or disbarment, EDWARD BISSAU MENDY, is hereby reinstated to active status, effective immediately.
******EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

The undersigned, as the chief financial officer of Valley Financial Corporation,certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is madesolely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c). 

Dated: May 9, 2006 

 

 

41
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self Employed Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, November 18, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section                           ( print page 62631)                        10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self Employed Project Committee will be held Thursday, November 18, 2010, at 9 a.m. Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Janice Spinks. For more information please contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: October 4, 2010.

Shawn F. Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. 2010-25474 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6970

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LEROY HOUSTON, III,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-96-155, CA-97-1083-AM)

Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 26, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy Houston, III, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Margaret Flint, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Houston, Nos. CR-96-155; CA-97-1083-AM

(E.D. Va. Apr. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 10.23

PROMISORRY NOTE

ADDENDUM AND MODIFICATION AGREEMENT




THIS ADDENDUM AND MODIFICATION AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made effective this 2nd day of January 2009 (the “Effective Date”), by and among Human BioSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) and Dutchess Private Equities Fund, Ltd., its affiliates and designees (collectively, the “Holder”). 




RECITALS




WHEREAS the Company and Holder entered into a Promissory Note (the “Note”) dated May 15, 2007 wherein the Company agreed to repay the face amount of $462,000 to the Holder by April 15, 2008; 




WHEREAS in accordance with Section 4.2(a) of the Note, upon the occurrence the Event of Default, the Holder was entitled to execute Puts in an amount that will repay the Holder.




NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties identified below hereby agree as follows:




1.

The parties have mutually agreed to delete section 4.2(a) of the Note so that the Holder does not have the right to execute the Puts upon the Event of Default by the Company.




2.

All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Note.




3.

Except as specifically amended hereby, the terms and conditions of the Note remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS THEREOF, each of the Company and the Holder has caused this Addendum and Modification to the Purchase Agreement to be executed and delivered as of this 2nd day of January 2009.




ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO BY:




COMPANY:

HOLDER:




HUMAN BIOSYSTEMS, INC.

DUTCHESS PRIVATE EQUITIES FUND, LTD.







___________________________

By:_______________________________

Harry Masuda

Douglas Leighton

President

Director
651 A.2d 99

#### M. ALFIERI CO., INC., APPELLANT-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENERGY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Argued October 24, 1994

Decided January 12, 1995.

*Charles Oransky*argued the cause for appellant *(Hellring Lindeman Goldstein & Siegal,*attorneys).

*Barbara Conklin,*Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent *(Deborah T. Poritz,*Attorney General of New *643Jersey, attorney; *Mary C. Jacobson,*Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 269 *N.J.Super.*545, 636 A.2d 87 (1994).

*For Affirmance*— Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 6.

*Opposed*— None.
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Orion Engineered Carbons S.A. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:     February 23, 2017





By:  /s/ Charles Herlinger _______________


Charles Herlinger


Chief Financial Officer

















SC1:3819725.1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 17, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Connected Media Experience, Inc. (“CMX”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Puretracks, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Gracenote, Emeryville, CA; and Thwapr, Inc., New York, NY, have been added as parties to this venture.                          ( print page 62570)    

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and CMX intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On March 12, 2010, CMX filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 16, 2010 (75 FR 20003).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 28, 2010. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 14, 2010 (75 FR 40851).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2010-25212 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph G. Vega, Appellant.

[775 NYS2d 728]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted *(see People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from Judgment of Wayne County Court, Dennis Kehoe, J.— Criminal Possession of Stolen Property, 4th Degree.) (Present— Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Scudder, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.
#### In re Charles D. JONES.

No. 2010-B-2047.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 20, 2010.

ORDER

Considering the Petition for Interim Suspension filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and the response thereto filed by respondent,

IT IS ORDERED that Charles D. Jones, Louisiana Bar Roll number 7476, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19, pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that necessary disciplinary proceedings be instituted in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, §§ 11 and 19.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Greg Gerard Guidry Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana