alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2335
JERRY BLOW, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PHILIP MORRIS USA, INCORPORATED; BCTW&GM LOCAL UNION 203-T, Defendants - Appellees,
and JAMES M HARKLESS, OSCAR B. GILES, JR., Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (CA-03-201) Submitted: March 31, 2004 Decided: April 19, 2004 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.- 2 - Jerry Blow, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberlee W. DeWitt, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Richmond, Virginia; James J. Vergara, Jr., VERGARA & ASSOCIATES, Hopewell, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Jerry Blow seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions for summary judgment in his action under the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 (2000), in which he attacked an arbitrator’s decision in favor of his former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. SeeBlow v. Philip Morris USA , No. CA-03-201 (E.D. Va. Oct. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

April 02, 2014

Ms. Rebekah Shropshire

TDCJ #1495618

Crain 1401 St. School Road

Gatesville, TX 76599

Hon. Michael A. Sheppard

District Attorney

307 N. Gonzales

Cuero, TX 77901-6544

Re: Cause No. 13-14-00204-CR

Tr.Ct.No. 07-10-10,763

Style: In re Rebekah Shropshire

Enclosed please find the opinion issued by the Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: State Prosecuting Attorney

24th District Court

Hon. Tabeth Gardner, District Clerk/De Witt
Exhibit 32.1



Trico Marine Services, Inc.

Form 10-Q

Quarterly Report

Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2003



Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Ronald O. Palmer, Chief Financial Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1.    the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and



2.    the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by such Report.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2003 |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |
**Exhibit 15.3**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Qoros Automotive Co., Ltd.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-201716) on Form S-8 of Kenon Holdings Ltd. of our report dated 30 March2015, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of Qoros Automotive Co., Ltd. as of 31 December 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, changes in equity andcash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended 31 December 2014, which report appears in the 31 December 2014 annual report on Form 20-F of Kenon Holdings Ltd. 

/s/ KPMG Huazhen (SGP) 

Shanghai, China 

31 March 2015
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Consolidated Graphics, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Joe R. Davis, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

# (1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

# (2)                                  Information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Dated:    July28, 2004

 
|   | /s/ Joe R.  Davis                                               |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Joe R. Davis                                                    |
|   | Chairman of the Board  of Directors and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7439

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOB HYPOLITE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-98-159, CA-00-3495-4-22) Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 28, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Job Hypolite, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* While we have not determined precisely when the limitations period begins and ends for claims based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have determined that Apprendi claims may not be raised initially on collateral review. See United States v. Sanders , 247 F.3d 139, 144, 151 (4th Cir. 2001). 2 PER CURIAM:Job Hypolite seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. * United States v. Hypolite , Nos. CR-98-159; CA-00-3495-4-22 (D.S.C. Aug. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-3487

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Stephanie Thi Nguyen, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 31, 2011

 Filed: February 3, 2011

___________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Stephanie Thi Nguyen pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute 500 grams or

more of a methamphetamine mixture, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and subject to

sentencing under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1). The district court sentenced her to the

1

statutory minimum of 120 months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. 

Nguyen appeals. Her counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District 1

of Nebraska.
Counsel’s challenge to the sentence is unavailing. The record reflects that

Nguyen understood the statutorymandatoryminimumpenalties when she entered her

guilty plea. The district court had no discretion to impose a sentence below the

statutoryminimumwhere there was neither a departure motion by the government nor

eligibility for safety-valve relief. See United States v. Chacon, 330 F.3d 1065, 1066

(8th Cir. 2003).

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw, and we affirm the judgment.

______________________________

-2-
##### 



Exhibit 32.4

LIBERTY PROPERTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Liberty Property Limited
Partnership (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR., Chief Financial Officer of Liberty
Property Trust (the sole general partner of the Company), certify, in
connection with Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, that based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR.George J. Alburger, Jr.Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof Liberty Property Trust, its sole general partner


Date: November 8, 2004
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

 Reference is hereby madeto that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014, byand among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC,as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, andPentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C22 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that: 

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersignedhas executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017. 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober 

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

WILLIAM H. LYNCH JR.,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2722 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 70 DB 2020

Attorney Registration No. 39874

(Chester County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6

th day of January, 2022, upon consideration of the Report and 

Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, William H. Lynch, Jr. is suspended from the 

Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years. Respondent shall comply with all 

the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 

208(g).
#### Lance HARTWELL, Appellant, v. Walter A. McNEIL, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, and Mark Redd, Warden of Suwannee C.I., Appellees.

No. ID10-6047.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 24, 2011.

*1095Lance Hartwell, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. *See Miami-Dade County v. Peart,*843 So.2d 363 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Any remedy the appellant may have lies with the circuit court. *Cf. Snelson v. Snelson,*440 So.2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

BENTON, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                       6,136,433
<SECURITIES>                                 1,250,357
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,400,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                   105,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,780,330
<PP&E>                                       1,536,898
<DEPRECIATION>                                 659,394
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,540,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,392,052
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,302,111
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,233,800)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,540,007
<SALES>                                      4,193,906
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,193,906
<CGS>                                        1,433,170
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,267,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (139,082)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              82,665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,030)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (100,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             82,970
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    82,970
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DEMETRI GIBBS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-1926

[November 2, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, Judge; L.T. Case No. 11-7012CF10A.

Fairuze Sofia of The Sofia Law Firm, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      17,478,344
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         472,654
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,200,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  7,383,695
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      12,826,315
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        12,513,157
<LOANS>                                     94,072,356
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,200,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             139,814,554
<DEPOSITS>                                 127,956,638
<SHORT-TERM>                                   350,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,070,995
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,581,623
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,855,298
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             139,814,544
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,957,706
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,167,986
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,125,692
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,807,058
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,861,571
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,264,121
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  123,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              7,968,654
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,455,515
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     956,028
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   956,028
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.76
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.59
<LOANS-NON>                                    919,888
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,069,535
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    7,687
<RECOVERIES>                                    15,208
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,200,556
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,200,556
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11

              Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings

                 Three Months Ended September 30, 2001 and 2000

                (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three months ended September 30,
                                                           --------------------------------
                                                                2001             2000
                                                            -----------      -----------
<S>                                                         <C>              <C>
Net income ...........................................      $     3,553      $     3,176
                                                            ===========      ===========

Number of shares outstanding:
Weighted average shares issued .......................       11,900,000       11,900,000
Less: Weighted average shares held in treasury .......        4,260,678        3,654,444
Less: Average shares held by the ESOP ................          952,000          952,000
Plus: ESOP shares released or committed to be released
        during the fiscal year .......................          619,611          513,857
                                                            -----------      -----------
Average basic shares .................................        7,306,933        7,807,413
Plus: Average common stock equivalents ...............          566,808          435,556
                                                            -----------      -----------
Average diluted shares ...............................        7,873,741        8,242,969
                                                            ===========      ===========
Earnings per common share:
        Basic ........................................      $      0.49      $      0.41
                                                            ===========      ===========
        Diluted ......................................      $      0.45      $      0.39
                                                            ===========      ===========
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2066

NED N. CARY, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; COMMONWEALTH

OF VIRGINIA; US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE; THE UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Dennis W. Dohnal, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-01-31)

Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 13, 2002

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ned N. Cary, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia; George G. Davidson,

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland; Louis Edward

Matthews, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ned N. Cary, Jr., appeals the district court’s order: (1) denying relief on his complaint alleging a violation of 42 U.S.C.A.

§ 1983 (West Supp. 2001); and (2) upholding the Commissioner’s

decision that Cary is not entitled to disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Cary v. Social Security Admin.,

No. CA-01-31 (E.D. Va. July 11, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In re Warren D. RUSH.

No. 2010-OB-2104.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 28, 2010.

ORDER

Considering the Petition for Transfer to Disability Inactive Status filed by respondent, and the response thereto filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that Warren D. Rush, Louisiana Bar Roll number 11545, be and he hereby is transferred to disability inactive status. All disciplinary proceedings against respondent shall be deferred until such time as he resumes active status.

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order shall be effective immediately.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ John L. Weimer

Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana
584 A.2d 239

#### DANIEL TUMPSON, ET AL. v. JAMES FARINA, ETC., ET AL.

June 7, 1990.

Petition for certification granted. (See 240 *N.J.Super.*346, 573 A.2d 472)