alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered January 13 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00507

- CR
FLOR DEMARI BALCARCE L, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MB10

- 33676C



### O RDER This Court granted court reporter Pamela Durke

- Sweeny an extension of time until August 4, 2014 to file the reporter’s record. By notice dated August 4, 2014, Ms. Durke

- Sweeny was notified that the reporter’s record she attempted to electronically filed was rejected because
Volume 4 was not text searchable and the exhibits were not bookmarked. She was directed to file a corrected document with three days. To date, Ms. Durke

- Sweeny has neither filed a corrected reporter ’s record nor communicated with the Court regarding the status of the reporter’s record. Nor has appellant communicated with the Court regarding the reporter’s record or the status of the appeal.Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the trial court to make findi ngs of fact regarding

whether appellant has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial co urt determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal.

 The trial court shal l next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can be filed.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date
of this order. The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to c omply with this order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received,
whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7186
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL BURGESS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Ale xandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CR-88-233-A, CA-92-1816-AM) Submitted: October 20, 1997 Decided: October 29, 1997 Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alan Hideto Yamamoto, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert Clifford Chesnut, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Michael Anthony Burgess appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). In a prior appeal, this court vacated and remanded to the district court to conduct an evidentiary hearing, with appointed counsel, to determine whether Burgess requested his attorney to note an appeal from his conviction. The district court concluded, after hearing testimony from Burgess and his attorney, that Burgess had not, in fact, asked his attorney to appeal. Our review of the transcript from that hearing reveals that the district court's conclusion was properly supported. Because Burgess failed to appeal, his other claims are waived. See United States v. Emanuel , 869 F.2d 795, 796(4th Cir. 1989) (nonconstitutional claims not raised on direct appeal may not be asserted in a collateral proceeding). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
584 A.2d 213

#### CITICORP MORTGAGE, INC. v. STEVEN PESSIN.

May 15, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 238 *N.J.Super.*606, 570 A.2d 481)
585 A.2d 399

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSEPH R. ERVIN.

October 16, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 242 *N.J.Super.*584, 577 A.2d 1273)
865 A.2d 657

#### IN THE MATTER OF KATHLEEN F. GAHLES, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 012911982).

January 27, 2005.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-192, concluding that KATHLEEN F. GAHLES of NESHANIC STATION, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be reprimanded for violating *RPC*3.2 (failing to treat with courtesy and consideration all persons involved in legal process);

And the Court having determined on its own motion, pursuant to *Rule*l:20-16(b), to review the matter, and having concluded that respondent’s unethical conduct in this matter warrants an admonition;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KATHLEEN F. GAHLES is hereby admonished; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06

- 14

- 00089

- CV

In the Interest of C.A.J., a Child

(No. CCL14TA142 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF CASS COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

SUPPLEMENTAL CLERK'S REC ORD

REPORTER'S RECORD

CLERK'S RECORD

FILING

MOTION FEE $10.00

$10.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$195.00

$10.00 E

- PAID

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT KEM G KIBBE

JASON HORTON, APPT A TTY

JASON HORTON, APPT A TTY

JASON HORTON, APPT A TTY

JASON HOR TON, APPT ATTY

CARLY ANDERSON, APPT ATTY

CARLY ANDERSON, APPT ATTY

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct

copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF

TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause,

as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,

witness my hand and the Seal of

the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Sixth District of Texas, this

May 14, 2015

.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___

________________________ Deputy
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RONALD D. JORDAN,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D15-3996

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 27, 2016

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit 

Court for Orange County,

Wayne C. Wooten, Judge.

Ronald D. Jordan, Lake City, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice to Appellant filing a request for extension of time in the 

trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.050(2). 

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
#### In re Neil D. MONTGOMERY.

No. 2005-OB-2384.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 4, 2011.

ORDER

Considering the “Termination of Conditional Admission” filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that the probationary period imposed by this court in *In re: Montgomery,*05-2384 (La.12/16/05), 916 So.2d 1028, be and hereby is terminated, as the court finds petitioner has successfully complied with all terms of probation. FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Bernette J. Johnson Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana
C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S AUSTIN, TEXAS M A R K F I B R A N Z , § A p p e l l a n t , § 

### v s . § N O . 05-14-01203-CR § T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S , § A p p e l l e e . §

M O T I O N F O R E X T E N S I O N O F T I M E
T O T H E H O N O R A B L E J U D G E O F S A I D C O U R T: COMES NOW MARK FIBRANZ, Appellant, by and through his Attorney of Record, MARK T. 

### LASSITER, and tenders, pursuant to the Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(d), this Motion for Extension of Time. In support of this motion. Appellant would show the following: I . Mr. Lassiter has been involved with several jury trials and has not been able to finish researching to submit a petition for discretionary review. II. 

### This motion is not made for purposes of delay but that justice may be done. This is Appellant's first request for a continuance.
WHEREFORE, PREMISIS CONSIDERED, the Defendant/Appellant respectfully requests that this motion be granted.

PAGE - 1 

### PD-0837-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/6/2015 3:38:10 PM Accepted 7/7/2015 4:05:38 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that: 1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2014-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports"); 2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  U.S. Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee. Date:  March 22, 2016             /s/ Brian T. Stevens Name: Brian T. Stevens Title:   Vice President and Controller                             (senior officer of Servicer in charge of servicing function)
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS POLARIS IP, LLC)

Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. YAHOO! INC. , Defendant

- Appellant.

__________________________ 201 2- 104 5, 2013

- 1124

__________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 07- CV -0 37 1, Magi strate Judge Charles Everingham

.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ O R D E R The parties jointly move to withdraw the above ca ptioned a p peals. Upon consideration thereof , I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is granted. The appeal s are dismissed. Case: 12-1045 Document: 33 Page: 1 Filed: 03/26/2013BRIGHT RESPONSE , LLC V

. YAHOO ! INC

. 2

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s 21 Issued As A Mandate: March 26, 2013 Case: 12-1045 Document: 33 Page: 2 Filed: 03/26/2013
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS
CERTIFICATION UNDER
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trico Marine Services, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  November 9, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Geoff JonesGeoff JonesChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62549-62550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25626]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following meeting 
of the Medical Genetics Working Group.

[[Page 62550]]

    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: Medical Genetics Working Group.
    Date: November 10, 2010.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: Programmatic and policy needs and opportunities related 
to NCBI information resources in the medical genetics area.
    Place: National Library of Medicine, Building 38, 2nd Floor, 
Board Room, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: David J. Lipman, MD, Director, National Center 
for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, 
Department of Health and Human Services, Building 38A, Room 8N805, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-5985, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#41252d28312c202f012c20282d6f2f28296f262e37"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d8bcb4b1a8b5b9b698b5b9b1b4f6b6b1b0f6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    In the interest of security, NIH has instituted stringent 
procedures for entrance onto the NIH campus. All visitor vehicles, 
including taxicabs, hotel, and airport shuttles will be inspected 
before being allowed on campus. Visitors will be asked to show one 
form of identification (for example, a government-issued photo ID, 
driver's license, or passport) and to state the purpose of their 
visit.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: October 5, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-25626 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
585 A.2d 361

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EMANUEL REDDEN.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
No. 87-6569.

#### Walls *v.*Adult Parole Authority of Ohio.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
---

Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-204155) pertaining to the Helius
Medical Technologies, Inc. June 2014 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated
June 21, 2015, relating to the financial statements of Helius Medical
Technologies, Inc. (formerly NeuroHabiliatation Corporation) (the Company)
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of the Company for the year ended
March 31, 2015.

/s/ BDO CANADA LLP

Vancouver, Canada June 21, 2015

---
EX-10.32






 Exhibit 10.32 

WARRANT ADJUSTMENT CERTIFICATE 
  

			
	 Date:
	  	June 28, 2021
		
	 To:
	  	GEM Global Fund LLC SCS with respect to warrants issued on July 10, 2020 (the “Warrants”)
		
	 Re:
	  	Adjustment to terms of outstanding Warrants

  
  

This Warrant Adjustment Certificate (“Certificate”) is being delivered to confirm certain adjustments to the terms of the Warrants. Initially
capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meaning given to such terms in the certificates representing the Warrants. 
 This Certificate
confirms two adjustments (the “Adjustments”): 
  

	 	1.	 A change in the currency of the Exercise Price from Canadian dollars to United States dollars.



  

	 	2.	 An adjustment pursuant to Section 5(c) of the certificate representing the Warrants resulting from the
dividend of shares of Canada Jetlines Operations Ltd. (“Jetlines”) that occurred as a result of the arrangement agreement between Jetlines and the Company dated May 19, 2021 (the “Arrangement Agreement”) under
which the Company transferred 75% of the shares of Jetlines to shareholders of the Company (the “Arrangement”). 


 The
table below sets out the terms of the Warrants following the Adjustments: 
  

							
	 Prior Terms
	  	 Adjusted Terms

	 Exercise Price
	  	No. of Warrants	  	Exercise Price	  	No. of Warrants
	 Cdn$0.50
	  	2,106,290	  	US$0.39	  	2,182,553

 Each Warrant shall otherwise continue to be governed by and be subject to the terms of the certificate under which such
Warrant was granted. 
 *
            *             *            
*             * 
 The Company will not be issuing any new certificates for the Warrants after
the Effective Time.  
 Dated the 28th day of June, 2021. 

GLOBAL CROSSING AIRLINES GROUP INC. 
  

	
	 




  

	Ryan Goepel
	EVP & Chief Financial Officer

 The adjustments set forth in this Certificate are accepted and agreed to this 28th day of June, 2021 
 GEM GLOBAL FUND LLC SCS 

 

	
	 /s/ Chris Brown

Name: Chris Brown

	Title: Authorized Signatory
585 A.2d 360

#### IN THE MATTER OF ROY SAVAGE.

July 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
SARAH LOUCKS 804 Pecan Street

DISTRICT CLERK PO Box 770

PHONE (512) 332-7244 Bastrop, TX 78602

FAX (512) 332-7249

Bastrop County District Clerk

June 8, 2015

Re: Court of Appeals Number: 03-15-00253-CV; 03-15-00254-CV; 03-15-00255-CV

Trial Court Case Number: 11,883; 11,884; 11,930

Style: William H. Mikulin, Trustee of Combined Financial Holdings Trust

v. The Yegua Trust, et al

To: Court of Appeals

The above referenced cases appeal were due June 8, 2015. 

I unsuccessfully tried 2 or 3 times to contact Mr. William H. Mikulin to speak with him

about the appeal fee due our office for the 3 cases.

I contacted Chris Knowles in the Court of Appelas on June 8th, 2015 to advise him of the 

no contact and no payment for the appeal fee on all of the three cases. Mr Knowles 

advised me to send a status letter regarding this matter.

After the Notice of Appeal was filed, the court costs due for the 3 cases were paid in full 

and I also wanted to speak with Mr. Mikulin regarding this event. Mr. Mikulin is the only 

contact I have for these three appeals.

Please let this letter serve as the status update on these appeals.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Mary Lynn Harmon. Chief Deputy Clerk

Bastrop County District Clerk Office

804 Pecan Street

Bastrop, TX 78602

(512) 332-7246

Mary.harmon@co.bastrop.tx.us
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax Credit Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be Wednesday, November 24, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marianne Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7978.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax Credit Project Committee will be held Wednesday, November 24, 2010, at 1 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Marianne Ayala. For more information, please contact Ms. Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7978, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: October 4, 2010.

Shawn F. Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2010-25488 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P