alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MURPHY CORMIER GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC. v. STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HOSPITALS, et al.

No. 2011-CC-1056.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 23, 2011.

In re Cambre, Glenn; Department of Health & Hospitals; Office of Public Health; State of Louisiana et al.; —Defendants); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 2007-3828; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 11-00477.

Stay denied; writ denied.
(logo)TORCHLIGHT

 

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust2014-C20, 

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 

Series 2014-C20 (the “Trust”)

 

I, WilliamA. Clarkson, on behalf of Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as special servicer(the “Certifying Servicer”), certify to J.P. Morgan Chase CommercialMortgage Securities Corp. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and withthe knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

 

I (or ServicingOfficers under my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’sactivities for the fiscal year 2019 (the “Reporting Period”) and the CertifyingServicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all materialrespects during the Reporting Period.

 

 

Date: February 28, 2020

 

 

TORCHLIGHTLOAN SERVICES, LLC, as Special Servicer

 

 

By:/s/ William A. Clarkson

Name:William A. Clarkson

Title:Authorized Signatory

 

 

280Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017

T212.883.2800   F 212.883.2560

Einfo@torchlightloanservices.com

www.torchlightinvestors.com
Exhibit
      32.2




HERITAGE
      OAKS BANCORP




Quarterly
      Report on Form 10Q


for
      the
      Quarter ended June 30, 2006




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The
      undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the
      “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that, to my
      knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March
      31,
      2005, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      “Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies
      with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange
      Act;
      and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the
      Company.





Dated:
              August 3, 2006
            
            /s/
              Margaret A. TorresMargaret
                A. Torres
              Executive
                Vice President and Chief Financial
                Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Heritage Oaks Bancorp, and will be retained
      by Heritage Oaks Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00366-CR

EMILIO VARGAS

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 21FC-1613F

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 20, 2022
866 A.2d 981

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. MICHAEL J. NATALE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-PETITIONER.

January 20, 2005.

ORDER ON CERTIFICATION

IT IS ORDERED that the State’s petition for certification and defendant’s cross-petition for certification are granted.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**PDS GAMING CORPORATIONCERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of PDS Gaming Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Johan P. Finley,Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, and Peter D. Cleary,President, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and Interim Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    |  /s/   Johan P. Finley                                                              | Dated: | August 14,  2003 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------|
|   |  Johan P. Finley                                                                         |   |             |
| Title: |  Chief Executive Officer and Chairman                                                    |   |             |
|   |                                                                                          |   |             |
|   |                                                                                          |   |             |
| By:    |  /s/   Peter D. Cleary                                                              | Dated: | August 14,  2003 |
|   |  Peter D. Cleary                                                                         |   |             |
| Title: |  President, Chief Operating Officer,  Treasurer and Interim Chief Financial Officer |   |             |

 

 

This certification is madesolely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledgestandard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2498
REGINALD D. EVANS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TIME WARNER CABLE, INCORPORATED; TIME WARNER CABLE, South Carolina Division, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-04-1003-3-17BC) Submitted: April 27, 2005 Decided: May 16, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald D. Evans, Appe llant Pro Se. Frank Rogers Ellerbe, III, ROBINSON, MCFADDEN & MOORE, PC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Reginald D. Evans appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 532 (2000) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Evans v. Time Warner Cable , No. CA-04-1003-3-17BC (D.S.C. filed Nov. 4, 2004 & entered Nov. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
864 A.2d 1107

#### IN THE MATTER OF ALAN M. DARNELL, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

January 11, 2005.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court by David E. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, Director of the Office of Attorney Ethics, and with the consent of respondent, ALAN M. DARNELL of WOODBRIDGE, and his attorney, Robert A. Weir, Jr., Esquire, and the Office of Attorney Ethics and respondent having agreed that respondent lacks the capacity to engage in the practice of law and should be transferred to disability inactive status in accordance with *Rule*l:20-12(b), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*l:20-12(b), ALAN M. DARNELL, admitted to practice in this state in 1971, is hereby transferred to disability inactive status, effective immediately and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

*250ORDERED that ALAN M. DARNELL is hereby restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period that he remains on disability inactive status; and it is further

ORDERED that ALAN M. DARNELL shall comply with *Rule*1:20-20 governing suspended, disbarred and incapacitated attorneys.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1702

PALMER RUSSELL FITZGERALD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN H. MAJOR, Trading as Major Recording Company, Incorporated,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. B. Waugh Crigler, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-96-8-H)

Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 9, 1996

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Palmer Russell Fitzgerald, Appellant Pro Se. Colin James Steuart

Thomas, Jr., TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, P.C., Staunton,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The parties consented to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (1994).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's orders dismissing his civil action for lack of federal jurisdiction and granting

sanctions against him.* We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Fitzgerald v.

Taylor, No. CA-96-8-H (W.D. Va. May 6 & 31, 1996). We deny the

motions to dismiss the appeal and for summary affirmance without

briefs. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### L.E.O. and P.O. v. A.L. and J.I.P.

2080395.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

Oct. 9, 2009.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 15, 2010.

Joan-Marie Dean, Huntsville, for appellants.

Christina L. Dixon, Huntsville, for ap-pellees.

MOORE, Judge.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala.R.App. P.; § 12-15-1(10), Ala.Code 1975 (now codified at § 12-15-101(8), Ala.Code 1975); *J.W. v. N.K.M.,*999 So.2d 526 (Ala.Civ.App.2008); *T.T.T. v. R.H.,*999 So.2d 544 (Ala.Civ.App.2008); *A.J.H.T. v. K.O.H.,*983 So.2d 394 (Ala.Civ.App.2007); *J.S.M. v. P.J.,*902 So.2d 89, 95 (Ala.Civ.App.2004); and *O.L.D. v. J.C.,*769 So.2d 299 (Ala.Civ.App.1999).

J.LP.’s request for the award of an attorney fee on appeal is denied.

PITTMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

THOMPSON, P.J., dissents, without ■writing.

BRYAN, J., dissents, with writing.

BRYAN, Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. In my opinion, L.E.O. and P.O. have demonstrated on appeal that the Madison Circuit Court was plainly or palpably wrong in concluding that the child in question, born in June 2003, was not a dependent child pursuant to § 12-15-1(10), AIa.Code 1975 (now codified at § 12-15-101(8), Ala.Code 1975).

L.E.O. and P.O. produced substantial evidence indicating that J.I.P., the child’s father, had abandoned the child. Specifically, L.E.O. and P.O. produced evidence indicating that, for three years prior to the final hearing in this case, the father had not paid any support for the child and indicating that father had not seen the child since August 2005. The father admitted that he did not know where the child went to school or who the child’s doctors were. The father testified that his visitation with the child had been thwarted by the child’s mother and that he had been unaware that the child was living with L.E.O. and P.O. The father’s abandonment of the child for approximately three years cannot be excused simply because he contends that he was unaware of the child’s circumstances. The fact that he was unaware of who was caring for and providing for his child during that time further convinces me that he had abandoned the child. The evidence produced by L.E.O. and P.O. unequivocally shows *1042that the father had “with[held] from the child, without good cause or excuse, ... his presence, care, love, protection, maintenance, or the opportunity for the display of filial affection,” had “fail[ed] to claim the rights of a parent,” and had “fail[ed] to perform the duties of a parent.” § 26-18-3(1), Ala.Code 1975 (now codified at § 12-15-301(1), Ala.Code 1975), thereby demonstrating that the child was dependent.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kelvin HARRISON.

No. 2011-KK-0405.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 28, 2011.

In re Harrison, Kelvin; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. L, No. 500-622; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0117.

Stay denied; writ denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements found in the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10Q for the quarter ended August 30, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-30-1997
<CASH>                                              12,709
<SECURITIES>                                        11,042
<RECEIVABLES>                                       25,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                           309
<INVENTORY>                                         10,506
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    64,961
<PP&E>                                             119,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                      54,962
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     133,042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               19,610
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                          67,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       133,042
<SALES>                                             44,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    44,559
<CGS>                                               38,797
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       38,797
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     4,871
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        404
<INCOME-TAX>                                           111
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    293
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           293
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .05
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Dwayne HARVEY v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1259.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2011.

In re Harvey, Dwayne; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 46Q-849; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 10-K-0608.

Denied. La. CCr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172; see also *State v. Thomas,*08-2912, (La.10/16/09), 19 So.3d 466.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000921052
<NAME>                        WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS IV LP SERIES 4
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                           1,013,286
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,013,286
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,219,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,997,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,219,639
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    25,883
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       43,647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   416,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (434,164)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (434,164)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (434,164)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Redmond, Oregon. The purpose of the meeting is to review proposed projects and make recommendations under Title II (division C of Pub. L. 110-343 reauthorized and amended the Secure rural Schools and community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (SRS Act) as                               ( print page 1589)                            originally enacted in Public Law 106-393.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held January 27, 2010 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., and January 28, 2010 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held at the office of the Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council, 2363 SW Glacier Place, Redmond, Oregon 97756. Send written comments to Jeff Walter as Designated Federal Official, for the Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests Resource Advisory Committee, c/o Forest Service, USDA. Ochoco National Forest, 3160 NE., 3rd St., Prineville, OR 97754 or electronically to                         *jwalter@fs.fed.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeff Walter, Designated Federal Official, Ochoco National Forest, 541-416-6625.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring Title II matters to the attention of the Committee may flle written statements with the Committee staff before the meeting. A public input session will be provided and individuals who made written requests by January 15, 2010 will have the opportunity to address the Committee at the session.

Dated: January 4, 2010.

Jeff Walter,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 2010-252 Filed 1-11-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1722 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1722

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2007

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 601 Banyan Trail in Boca Raton, Florida, as the ``Leonard W. Herman 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEONARD W. HERMAN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 601 Banyan Trail in Boca Raton, Florida, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Leonard W. Herman Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Leonard W. 
Herman Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 22, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```