alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re Edward A. KAPLAN.

No. 2010-OB-2352.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 16, 2010.

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) has filed formal charges against respondent alleging that he facilitated the unauthorized practice of law by his non-lawyer staff. In addition, the ODC is conducting an investigation into several new complaints which allege serious attorney misconduct by respondent. Respondent now seeks to permanently resign from the practice of law in lieu of discipline. The ODC has concurred in respondent’s petition.

Having considered the Petition for Permanent Resignation from the Practice of Law filed by Edward A. Kaplan, Louisiana Bar Roll number 7622, and the concurrence thereto filed by the ODC,

IT IS ORDERED that the request of Edward A. Kaplan for permanent resignation in lieu of discipline be and is hereby granted, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.1 and Rule 5.5 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Edward A. Kaplan shall be permanently prohibited from practicing law in Louisiana or in any other jurisdiction in which he is admitted to the practice of law; shall be permanently prohibited from seeking readmission to the practice of law in this state or in any other jurisdiction in which he is admitted; and shall be permanently prohibited from seeking admission to the practice of law in any jurisdiction.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Bernette J. Johnson Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana
#### David B. MARCEL, Todd J. Marcel, Henry John Marcel, Kent Marcel, Mark H. Marcel, Susan M. Riedlinger, Individually and as Proper Parties-In-Interest for Henry Joseph Marcel v. DELTA SHIPBULIDING COMPANY, The Executive Officers of Delta Shipbuilding Company, The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York n/k/a Continental Insurance Company, as Insurer of Delta Shipbuilding Company and its Executive Officers, Viacom, Inc., Garlock, Inc., et al.

No. 2010-C-1997.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Continental Insurance Company; Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York n/k/a; —Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. B, No. 2008-11954; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-0168.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant.
*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NIMISH SHIRISH DAVE; ) No. 07-71415

JUI ROHIT PATEL, )

) Agency Nos. A079-195-915

Petitioners, ) A079-195-916

)

v. ) MEMORANDUM*

)

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney )

General, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

NIMISH SHIRISH DAVE; ) No. 07-72573

JUI ROHIT PATEL, )

) Agency Nos. A079-195-915

Petitioners, ) A079-195-916

)

v. ) 

)

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney )

General, )

)

Respondent. )

 )

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

FILED

OCT 31 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
**The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral

argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

***The Honorable Robert J. Timlin, Senior United States District Judge for

the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

1

While Patel filed a separate appeal, no separate arguments are made on her

behalf. Thus, we treat her position here as derivative of Dave’s and will not refer

to her separately. See 8 U.S.C. § 1153(d). 

2

See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(B). 

3

See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)(C).

2

Submitted October 11, 2011**

Pasadena, California

Before: FERNANDEZ and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and TIMLIN,***

District Judge.

Nimish Shirish Dave and Jui Rohit Patel,1

 citizens of Canada, petition for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of their motion to reopen to

consider an application for adjustment of status,2

 and their motion to reconsider

that denial.3

 We deny the petitions.

Dave asserts that the BIA erred when it determined that he had not made out

a prima facie case for adjustment of status pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i)(1), (2). 

We disagree. Dave failed to present sufficient evidence that he had an approved

labor certification. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(5)(A). Absent that, Dave could not

spell out a prima facie case for relief because he needed that in order to obtain an
4

8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(3)(C).

5

8 U.S.C. § 1255(i)(2)(A).

3

immigrant visa,4

 which he, in turn, needed to obtain adjustment of status.5 The

BIA did not abuse its discretion. See Edu v. Holder, 624 F.3d 1137, 1142 n.4 (9th

Cir. 2010); Ghahremani v. Gonzales, 498 F.3d 993, 997 (9th Cir. 2007); see also

INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323, 112 S. Ct. 719, 725, 116 L. Ed. 2d 823 

(1992).

Petitions DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS



The undersigned, as the chief executive officer of Valley Financial Corporation, certifies that the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, which
accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is
subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).



Dated: August 13, 2004



/s/ Ellis L. GutshallChief Executive Officer




36
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
CV Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                   |  | 
|------ |  | ----------------- |  | 
|Dated: |  | November 12, 2003 |  | 
|       |  |                   |  |
----

|  | Deloitte, Inc.Contadores Públicos AutorizadosRUC 16292-152-155203 D.V. 65Torre Banco Panamá, piso 12Avenida Boulevard y la RotondaCosta del Este, PanamáApartado 0816-01558Panamá, Rep. de PanamáTeléfono: (507) 303-4100Fax: (507) 269-2386infopanama@deloitte.com www.deloitte.com/pa |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                             |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   | Deloitte LATCO                   |
|   | Firma miembro de                 |
|   | Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited |

----
#### In re Melissa CULOTTA.

No. 2005-OB-2517.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 4, 2011.

ORDER

Considering the “Termination of Conditional Admission” filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that the probationary period imposed by this court in *In re: Culotta,*05-2517 (La.12/22/05), 917 So.2d 434, be and hereby is terminated, as the court finds petitioner has successfully complied with all terms of probation.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Bernette J. Johnson Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 27, 2010

s0920 

# Order

September 27, 2010

141299

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141299 COA: 287851 Kent CC: 07-010658-FH JEFFREY TROY MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 4, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Shirley FRUGHT v. LAFAYETTE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 2010-CC-2220.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Lafayette Insurance Company; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory *406and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 107-245; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-C-1035.

Not considered; not timely filed. *See State v. Crandell,*05-1060 (La.3/10/06), 924 So.2d 122; *Morris v. Stueben,*01-0137 (La.1/26/01), 781 So.2d 1220.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 734 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 734

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a refundable 
     credit against tax for landlords of veterans receiving rental 
    assistance under the Veterans Affairs Supported Housing program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2017

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a refundable 
     credit against tax for landlords of veterans receiving rental 
    assistance under the Veterans Affairs Supported Housing program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REFUNDABLE CREDIT FOR LANDLORDS OF VETERANS RECEIVING RENTAL 
              ASSISTANCE UNDER THE VETERANS AFFAIRS SUPPORTED HOUSING 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Subpart C of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting after 
section 36B the following new section:

``SEC. 36C. LANDLORDS OF VETERANS RECEIVING RENTAL ASSISTANCE UNDER THE 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS SUPPORTED HOUSING PROGRAM.

    ``In the case of a person who is an owner of a dwelling unit that 
is occupied by a veteran on whose behalf rental assistance is provided 
under section 8(o)(19) of the United States Housing Act of 1937, there 
shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this subtitle 
for the taxable year an amount equal to 10 percent of the amount of 
such rental assistance received by such person for such taxable 
year.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 6211(b)(4)(A) of such Code is amended by 
        inserting ``36C,'' after ``36B,''.
            (2) Section 1324(b)(2) of title 31, United States Code, is 
        amended by inserting ``36C,'' after ``36B,''.
            (3) The table of sections for subpart C of part IV of 
        subchapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
        is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 36B 
        the following new item:

``Sec. 36C. Landlords accepting rental assistance under the Veterans 
                            Affairs Supported Housing program.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of CV Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                   |  |                         
|------------------ |  | ------------------------
|Dated: May 9, 2006 |  | /s/ DANIEL K. SPIEGELMAN
|                   |  | Daniel K. Spiegelman    
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
| (logo)ncb

National Cooperative Bank

 

2011 Crystal Drive

Suite, 800

Arlington, VA 22202 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

                                                                                                                                             

 

# February 6, 2018

 

RBS Commercial Funding, Inc.as Depositor

600 Washington Blvd.

Stamford, CT 06901

 

RE:     Annual Statement as to Compliance

           WFRBS 2014 C21

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

Inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connection withthe issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2014-C21, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerlyNCB, FSB (the “Co-op Special Servicer”), I hereby certify that:

 

a.       A review of the activitiesof the Co-op Special Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the“Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.      To the best of myknowledge, based on these reviews, the Co-op Special Servicer has fulfilled allobligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

Please note that the annualfinancial statement will be sent under separate cover on or before March 31,2018.

 

 

Best regards,

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President,Investor Compliance

National Cooperative Bank,N.A.
HTML Editor


 



Exhibit 10(j)





 





1










 








 









2










 








 











3










 








 









4










 








 









5










 















6










 








 









7










 















8










 















9










 








 



















 





10










 








 





 






11










 








 








 










12










 








 





 






13










 








 





 






14










 








 





 






15










 








 





 


 


 


                                                                          BY: /s/ TGP


                                                                                  Agent and Attorney-in-Fact


 


                                                                          BY:  /s/ Roger L. Baumgardner


                                                                          TITLE: VP/ Sec & Treas.


                                                                          DATE:  9/21/98


 


 


                                 






16










 








 





 















17
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                        1
<CASH>                                             67,613 
<SECURITIES>                                            0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                     832,636 
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (38,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     1,641,787 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                2,595,252 
<PP&E>                                          1,273,798 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (488,528)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  3,554,179 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,870,643 
<BONDS>                                                 0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0 
<PREFERRED>                                             0 
<COMMON>                                              864 
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,682,672 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    3,554,179 
<SALES>                                         1,888,645 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,992,783 
<CGS>                                           1,007,451 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,007,451 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,238,006 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   40,239 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                239,910 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,395,244)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,395,244)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0 
<CHANGES>                                               0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,395,244)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.58)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 11
HMN Financial, Inc.
Computation of Earnings Per Common Share




                                     Three Months Ended March 31,               
                                   -----------------------------
Computation of Earnings 
  Per Common Share:                     1999             1998   
                                   -------------    ------------
Weighted average number of common 
 shares outstanding used in basic 
 earnings per common share 
 calculation                         4,509,368        5,447,501

Net dilutive effect of:
 Options                               186,223          403,037
 Restricted stock awards                26,551           61,395
                                     -----------      -----------

Weighted average number of shares 
 outstanding adjusted for effect 
 of dilutive securities              4,722,142        5,911,933
                                     ===========      ===========

Income available to common 
 shareholders                     $  1,602,000        1,663,355

Basic earnings per common share   $       0.36             0.31

Diluted earnings per common share $       0.34             0.28
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7120 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

extend through 2023 the authority of the Federal Election Commission to impose civil money penalties on the 

basis of a schedule of penalties established and published 

by the Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7120 EH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY AU2 THORITY OF FEDERAL ELECTION COMMIS3 SION THROUGH 2023. 

4 (a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 

5 309(a)(4)(C)(v) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 

6 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(4)(C)(v)) is amended by strik7 ing ‘‘December 31, 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

8 2023’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) shall take effect on the earlier of— 

11 (1) December 31, 2018; or 

12 (2) the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 27, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7120 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 

mission. penalties established and published by the Commoney penalties on the basis of a schedule of the Federal Election Commission to impose civil 1971 to extend through 2023 the authority of
#### STATE ex rel. Joshua WILLIAMS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1224.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re Williams, Joshua; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 365-337; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-0561.

Denied.
| (logo) WELLS   

           FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax:  410 715 2380 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RBS Commercial Funding, Inc.

600 Washington Blvd, 

Stamford, Connecticut 06901

 

RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator for the Queens Atrium Loan Combination (in such capacities, “Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the “reporting period”):

 

(a)     A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the “Servicing Agreement(s)”) has been made under my supervision; and

 

(b)     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.

 

March 19, 2015

 

/s/Brian Smith

Brian Smith 

Vice President

 

 

To:  RBS Commercial Funding, Inc

Schedule A

 

 

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014, by and among J.P. MORGAN CHASE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer,  LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer,  WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor, relating to the series, JPMBB 2014-C22 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, relating to the Queens Atrium Loan Combination, a  pari passu portion of which is included in the series WFRBS 2014-C21 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction.

To:  RBS Commercial Funding, Inc

Schedule B

 

 

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

 

Not Applicable
#### Lindsay JENKINS, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee, Appellee.

No. 4D10-209.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 9, 2011.

Lindsay Jenkins, Forest Hills, NY, pro se.

Richard E. Landman, Temple Fett Kearns and George N. Andrews, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We treat the order on appeal as a denial of injunctive relief entered after a foreclosure judgment. Appellant sought a temporary injunction voiding a foreclosure sale and writ of possession pending a ruling on her motion filed under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530. Having reviewed the entire record, we do not find that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied appellant’s motion for injunction.

GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.