alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements found in the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 29, 1998, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-29-1998
<CASH>                                          18,323
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                       259
<INVENTORY>                                     10,003
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,700
<PP&E>                                         118,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,683
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,816
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,576
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   117,071
<SALES>                                         20,515
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,515
<CGS>                                           27,627
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,708
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (39,309)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (14,938)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (24,371)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,371)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.93)
        

</TABLE>
585 A.2d 365

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. VINCENT BAKER.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LEROY COOK, SR.

,

Defendant Below

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE

,

Plaintiff Below

, A ppellee. §

§

§ No. 25, 2018

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. 0608025757 (N)

§

§

§

Submitted: March 2, 2018

Decided: Mar ch 27 , 2018

Before STRINE , Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 27 th day of March 2018, after consideration of the appellant’s opening

brief, the appellee’s motion to affirm, 1 and the record below, we conclude that the

judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s well

reasoned ord er dated December 19, 2017

. The appellant’s motion for correction of

a sentence imposed in an illegal manner was a reformulation of previous

,

unsuccessful attacks on his indictment . The Superior Court did not err in finding

1 On March 12, 2018 , the appellant filed a motion for leave to respond to the motion to affirm.

Under Sup reme Court Rule 25(a), a response to a motion to affirm is not permitted unless requested

by the Court. The Court did not request a response to the motion to affirm and finds no reason to

request a response after considering the appellant's motion.2

that the appellant challenged his underlying conviction , not his sentence as required

by Superior Court Criminal Rule 35(a), and that he was not entitled to the relief he

sought.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/ s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1404 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

a portion of the compensation received for active service and for inactiveduty training as a member of the Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2007 

Mr. CARNEY (for himself and Mr. PLATTS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income a portion of the compensation received 

for active service and for inactive-duty training as a 

member of the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN COMPENSATION OF 

4 MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 112 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to certain combat zone com7 pensation of members of the Armed Forces) is amended 

8 by adding at the end the following new subsection: 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1404 IH

1 ‘‘(e) PARTIAL EXCLUSION OF NON-COMBAT ZONE

2 COMPENSATION.—Gross income does not include 2 per3 cent of so much of the compensation received for active 

4 service, and inactive-duty training, as a member of the 

5 Armed Forces as would (but for this subsection) be includ6 ible in gross income.’’. 

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

8 (1) The heading for section 112 of such Code 

9 is amended by striking ‘‘COMBAT ZONE’’. 

10 (2) The table of sections for part III of sub11 chapter B of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by 

12 striking the item relating to section 112 and insert13 ing the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 112. Certain compensation of members of the Armed Forces.’’. 

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

16 December 31, 2006. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
#### CITY OF LAFAYETTE v. Joseph B. CORMIER.

No. 2010-K-1480.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 14, 2011.

In re Cormier, Joseph B.; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafayette, City Court of Lafayette, No. 2008-2664; 15th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 124,609; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW 10-00125.

Not considered, not timely filed.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merix
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 1, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Mark R. Hollinger, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2)    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: April 14, 2003



/S/  MARK R. HOLLINGERMark R. Hollinger Chief Executive Officer




A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Merix Corporation and will be retained by Merix Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,172
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             847
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,040
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     69,590
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          39,317
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            38,904
<LOANS>                                        204,959
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,107
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 343,217
<DEPOSITS>                                     292,380
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,095
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             13,253
<LONG-TERM>                                     12,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,178
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 343,217
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,081
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,485
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   166
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,732
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,874
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,252
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,480
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      241
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (6)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,955
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    618
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         513
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       513
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.31
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,567
<LOANS-PAST>                                       421
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    78
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,740
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,001
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      152
<RECOVERIES>                                        17
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,107
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,107
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Three months ended                         Nine months ended
                                                         December 31,                              December 31,
                                                    1996               1995                   1996               1995
                                              ---------------    ---------------        ---------------    ---------------
<S>                                           <C>                <C>                    <C>                <C>
Net income as reported. . . . . . . . . . .         $588,000           $466,000             $1,845,000         $1,389,000
                                              ===============    ===============        ===============    ===============

PRIMARY:
  Common and common equivalent shares 
    outstanding:
      Weighted average number of common
        shares outstanding. . . . . . . . .        3,114,376          3,096,035              3,106,791          3,082,244
      Common stock equivalents from options
        computed on the treasury-stock method
        using the average fair market value
        of common stock during the period .          187,564            143,832                157,811            156,200
                                              ---------------    ---------------        ---------------    ---------------
      Shares used in the computation. . . .        3,301,940          3,239,867              3,264,602          3,238,444
                                              ===============    ================       ===============    ===============

Primary net income per share. . . . . . . .          $0.18               $0.14                 $0.57              $0.43
                                              ===============    ================       ===============    ===============


FULLY DILUTED:
  Common and common equivalent shares 
    outstanding:
      Weighted average number of common
        shares outstanding. . . . . . . . .        3,114,376          3,096,035              3,106,791          3,082,244
      Common stock equivalents from options
        computed on the treasury-stock method
        using the higher of the average fair
        market value of common stock during
        the period or at the end of the
        period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          198,023            143,832                167,558            159,763
                                              ---------------    ---------------        ---------------    ---------------
      Shares used in the computation. . . .        3,312,399          3,239,867              3,274,349          3,242,017
                                              ===============    ================       ===============    ===============

  Fully diluted net income per share. . . .          $0.18              $0.14                  $0.56              $0.43
                                              ===============    ================       ===============    ===============
</TABLE>
Exhibit 15.5

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the annual report on Form 20-F and the registration statement on form S-8 (No. 333-201716) of Kenon Holdings
Ltd. of our report dated February 29, 2016 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Tower Semiconductor Ltd. and subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|Sincerely,                                  
|                                            
|LOGO                                        
|Brightman Almagor Zohar& Co.                
|                                            
|Certified Public Accountants                
|A Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited
|Tel Aviv, Israel                            
|April 21, 2016
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofConsolidated Graphics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G. ChristopherColville, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer andSecretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

# (1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

#  

# (2)                                  Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

#  

|   | Dated: | November 2, 2005 |                                       | /s/ G. Christopher  Colville |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                  | G. Christopher Colville                    |
|   |   |                  | Executive Vice  President, Chief Financial |
|   |   |                  | and Accounting Officer  and Secretary      |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2
 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   (A)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and(B)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
   May 14, 2009
    
    
    
    /s/ Laurie L. LathamDate
    
    
    
    Laurie L. LathamChief Financial Officer
#### Julie RAWLS v. John Mark JORDAN, and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Paul Doe.

No. 2011-CC-0761.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re State Farm Fire and Casualty Company; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 593,199; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 2353.

Denied.
#### William Carl MIXON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 79-1497.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 30, 1980.

*487Robin P. Hartman, Dallas, Tex. (Court-appointed), for plaintiff-appellant.

Arnaldo N. Cavazos, Jr., Shirley Baccus-Lobel, Asst. U.S. Attys., Dallas, Tex., for defendant-appellee.

Before TJOFLAT, POLITZ and HATCH-ETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In 1962, petitioner William Carl Mixon pleaded guilty to three federal offenses and was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment. Petitioner subsequently moved the court for a reduction of sentence, and his motion was denied. In December 1978, petitioner commenced these 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1976) proceedings. The district court referred the matter to the magistrate. By coincidence, the magistrate happened to have been the Assistant United States Attorney who had represented the Government in the earlier proceedings on petitioner’s motion for reduction of sentence, and, therefore, he was automatically disqualified to hear petitioner’s section 2255 motion. 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(3) (1976).

The disqualification was, unfortunately, neither noticed by the magistrate nor called to his attention by counsel, and he proceeded on to the merits of petitioner’s motion. At the conclusion of the hearing, the magistrate entered findings and conclusions and recommended to the district court that petitioner’s motion be denied. The district court adopted these findings and the recommendation, and denied petitioner’s motion.

Because of the disqualification, we treat the proceedings and the disposition below as a nullity. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is vacated, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

VACATED and REMANDED.
#### Robert JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D09-4887.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 10, 2010.

*371Robert Jackson, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appealed order. In addition, because the arguments made by appellant are repetitive and successive, we order appellant to show cause within twenty days why this court should not impose the sanction of no longer accepting his pro se filings and why it should not refer appellant to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings. *State v. Spencer,*751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999); § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2009).

*Affirmed; order to show cause issued.*

WARNER, POLEN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March1, 2014, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLANDLOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as SpecialServicer, SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC as Operating Advisor, U.S.BANK NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and Trustee, with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC19 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.      To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, George C. Platt, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ViewCast.com, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;   (b) [Intentionally omitted];   (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and   (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and   (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 14, 2007 /s/  George C. Platt   George C. Platt   Chief Executive Officer