alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Larkin Pitts v. Burgess & Neal.

(No. 3485.)

May 13, 1885.

Error from Guadalupe County.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

■§ 700. *Trial of right of property; party to writ not entitled to; case stated.*Burgess & Neai obtained a judgment against Larkin Pitts *et at.,*and caused an execution to be issued thereon and levied upon certain cattle. Pitts claimed the cattle under the statute for the trial of the right of property. The claimant’s oath and bond were returned to the county court and the cause docketed in said court. Burgess & Neal moved to dismiss the proceeding upon the ground that Pitts was a defendant in the execution which had been levied upon the cattle, and was not entitled to the remedy provided by the statute for the trial of the right of property. This motion was sustained. *Held,*there is no error in the ■judgment dismissing the proceeding. A party to the writ levied cannot avail himself of the remedy provided by this statute. The object of the statute is to furnish third parties — strangers to the writ — a speedy remedy in case their property is seized for the debt of another, or is taken as the property of another. It furnishes no remedy to a party to the writ. [R. S. art. 4822.] The fact that the sheriff accepted the oath and bond of the claimant, and returned the same to the proper court, did not cpnfer upon the claimant a remedy which was denied him by the plain intent of the statute.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                        11816738
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          464676
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               6275000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    5792826
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        16054820
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          16274092
<LOANS>                                       69351206
<ALLOWANCE>                                  (1008413)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               119155198
<DEPOSITS>                                   108364197
<SHORT-TERM>                                    580000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1427227
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       4201428
<OTHER-SE>                                     4582346
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               119155198
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                4706687
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               872277
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                189918
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               5768882
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1825803
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               51048
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          3892031
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   104000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               10504
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                7098320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1609541
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1036597
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1036597
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .93
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.98
<LOANS-NON>                                     863917
<LOANS-PAST>                                      1199
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                276306
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 110572
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                930284
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    40861
<RECOVERIES>                                     14990
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1008413
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1008413
        

</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884-2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

270 Park Avenue, 

New York, NY 10017

 

 

RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator for the Outlets at Orange Whole Loan (in such capacities, “Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the “reporting period”):

 

(a)     A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the “Servicing Agreement(s)”) has been made under my supervision; and

 

(b)     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.

 

 

 

March 19, 2015

 

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

Brian Smith

Vice President

 

 

 

.

 

 

 

 

To:  J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

 

Schedule A

 

 

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2014 by and among J.P. MORGAN CHASE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., as Depositor, KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and Trustee, and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor relating to the Series JPM 2014-C19 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, relating to the Outlets at Orange Whole Loan, a pari passu portion of which is included in the Series JPM 2014-C20 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To:  J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

Schedule B

 

 

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

 

Not Applicable
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000921052
<NAME>                    WNC California Housing Tax Credits IV, L.P., Series 4
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             537,148
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   537,148
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,997,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,867,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,997,914
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     5,654
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      103,093
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   487,797
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (585,236)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (585,236)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (585,236)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0




</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Corporate Trust ServicesMAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.

c/o Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

375 Park Avenue 2nd floor

J0127-023 

New York, New York 10152-023 

 

 

 

 

RE:Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-LC16

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement  dated as of June 1, 2014 (the "Agreement" ), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period" ) :

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

February 26, 2015

 

/s/  Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH 

Vice President

 

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  |
|------------------------|--|
584 A.2d 249

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL F. ALDRIDGE.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7110

DONALD WELLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusMAJOR TOWNSEND; DONALD HICKS, Sergeant; CAPTAIN SMITH; C. D. LARSEN, Warden; J. BERRY, Sergeant; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-99-42-3) Submitted: May 23, 2000 Decided: June 7, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Donald Wells, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Donald Wells, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (WestSupp. 2000) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Wells v. Townsend , No. CA-99-42-3 (E.D. Va. July 21, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OFTHE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0099
IN THE MATTER OF: 

### JUL 27 

### 2021 Bovven Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State nf Montana L.Q.M., ORDER

A Youth in Need ofCare. Counsel for the appellant father ofL.Q.M. filed a motion and brief asking to be allowed to withdraw from this appeal on groundsthat counselhas been unable to find any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA,and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). The father was granted time to file a response,butnoresponse was filed. The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA,and Anders. We conclude there are no arguments with potential legal merit that could be raised in the father's appeal in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED thatthis appeal is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord and to the appellant father personally. DATED this di5r

- ofJuly,2021. ChiefJustice 07/27/2021 Case Number: DA 21-0099

## 2 ••It /1 4 (Cif Justiccs /

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,221
<SECURITIES>                                    19,661
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                       432
<INVENTORY>                                      8,189
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,636
<PP&E>                                           4,960
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,685
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,213
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,223
<SALES>                                          9,503
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,503
<CGS>                                            7,587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,317
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    105
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                105
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       105
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
#### Alexander Antonio BRENES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D11-611.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 27, 2011.

Rehearing Denied June 3, 2011.

*1187Martin J. Rivas, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, CORTIÑAS, and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Hernandez v. State,*61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).
#### Shannon BOURQUE v. FIRE MOUNTAIN RESTAURANTS, L.L.C.

No. 2010-C-2566.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re Bourque, Shannon; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 119,421; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 0555.

Denied.
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06-14-00089-CV

In the Interest of C.A.J., a Child

(No. CCL14TA142 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF CASS COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

SUPPLEMENTAL CLERK'S RECORD

REPORTER'S RECORD

CLERK'S RECORD

FILING

MOTION FEE

$10.00

$10.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$195.00

$10.00

E-PAID

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

KEM G KIBBE

JASON HORTON, APPT ATTY

JASON HORTON, APPT ATTY

JASON HORTON, APPT ATTY

JASON HORTON, APPT ATTY

CARLY ANDERSON, APPT ATTY

CARLY ANDERSON, APPT ATTY

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE 

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct 

copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF 

TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, 

as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, 

witness my hand and the Seal of 

the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Sixth District of Texas, this 

May 14, 2015.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___________________________

Deputy
#### Anthony Ray WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D10-2282.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 20, 2011.

Rehearing Denied June 8, 2011.

Anthony Ray Williams, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nicholas Merlin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before, GERSTEN and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Williams v. State,*994 So.2d 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), and cased cited.
#### Judith Jean EAST, Appellant, v. CVS PHARMACY, INC., Gab Robins, Appellees.

No. 1D10-0398.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 14, 2010.

Catherine F. Agacinski of Silver & Aga-cinski, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Cheryl L. Wilke of Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellees.

MARSTILLER, J.

The claimant in this workers’ compensation case appeals an order denying her petition for permanent total disability (“PTD”) benefits. We affirm the order because the claimant failed to prove she would be permanently disabled after reaching overall maximum medical improvement (“MMI”).

The claim for PTD benefits arose from compensable injuries (fractured right kneecap and left elbow, and injured low back) the claimant sustained when she fell from a ladder while at work. She had received temporary partial disability (“TPD”) benefits for the full 104-week period allowed under section 440.15(4), Florida Statutes, and sought PTD benefits beginning December 25, 2008. When the claimant filed her petition in May 2009, an orthopedic surgeon, a pain management *517specialist and a psychiatrist were treating her. As of the December 2009 hearing, the orthopedic surgeon restricted the claimant to sedentary work, requiring her to sit with her leg elevated and ice her knee frequently. But the surgeon would not impose permanent physical and work restrictions or find MMI until the claimant completed physical therapy. And the psychiatrist would not put the claimant at MMI for depression, anxiety and insomnia secondary to chronic pain until she reached orthopedic MMI. Only the pain management specialist deemed her at MMI for chronic knee and leg pain. But he would not assign work restrictions until the orthopedic surgeon placed the claimant at MMI and she underwent a functional capacities examination.

A claimant seeking PTD benefits before she reaches overall MMI must prove she has a present total disability and that said disability will exist after the date of MMI. *See Crum v. Richmond,*46 So.3d 633, 637 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); *City of Pensacola Firefighters v. Oswald,*710 So.2d 95, 98 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). At the time of the hearing, the claimant here was not at overall MMI. And although the orthopedist’s restrictions resulted in total disability, he would not find MMI, impose permanent restrictions, or even know what those restrictions would be until the claimant completes the full course of physical therapy. Thus, the claimant did not prove her disability would continue after reaching full MMI. For this reason, the Judge of Compensation Claims correctly denied the claimant’s petition for PTD benefits.

AFFIRMED.

, PADOVANO and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Financial statements for the year ended September 30, 1999 have not been
prepared in as much as the reporting entities have not commenced operations as
of that date.
</FN>


</TABLE>