alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

HERITAGE OAKS BANCORP

 

Quarterly Report on Form 10Q

for the Quarter ended June 30,2002

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Theundersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the“Company”), hereby certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2002, as filed by the Company with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is anExhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this QuarterlyReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  August 6, 2002 | /S/ Lawrence  P. Ward                  |   |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                        | Lawrence P.  Ward,                     |
|                        | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: AMENDMENT OF RULE 1.2 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT : : : : : NO. 147 DISCIPLINARY RULES DOCKET

**ORDER**
**PER CURIA M**  **AN D**  **NOW**, this 26th day of October, 2016 , upon the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ; the proposal to amend Pa.R.P.C. 1.2 having been published for comment in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, 46 Pa.B. 2274 (May 7, 2016) : **IT IS**  **ORDERED** pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Rule 1. 2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct is amended in the attached form. This **ORDER** shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective in 30 days

.
Additions to the rules are in bold and are underlined. Deletions from the rules are shown in bold and brackets.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25679]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than October 28, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill III, Vice 
President), 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. William Lee Hale and the William Lee Hale Trust, both of Bland, 
Virginia, acting in concert to retain control of 20.86% of the voting 
shares of First Regions Bancshares, Inc., Richlands, Virginia and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First Sentinel Bank, 
Richlands, Virginia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 7, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-25679 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Franklin D. BLACKWELL.

No. 2010-KK-2823.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 14, 2011.

In re Department of Children and Family Services; —Other; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 475636; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 1722.

Denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XINHUA LI,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-70799

Agency No. A088-130-220

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 19, 2013** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Xinhua Li, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying her application for asylum and withholding of removal. 

FILED

DEC 9 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review and

we remand.

The BIA determined Li’s testimony was not sufficiently persuasive and

specific to establish she underwent a forced abortion in China, and that she

provided no corroboration of this claim. The BIA also determined Li failed to

corroborate the arrests based on her Christian religion. In reaching these

conclusions, the BIA did not have the benefit of our decision in Ren v. Holder, 648

F.3d 1079 (9th Cir. 2011), regarding notice and an opportunity to provide

corroborative evidence. Thus, we grant the petition for review and remand this

case to the BIA for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v.

Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

2 11-70799
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2566]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit 
comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. A copy of the agreement is 
available through the Commission's Web site (www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fb8f899a9f9e9a959a9782889288bb9d9698d59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="522620333637333c333e2b213b2112343f317c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 011966-002.
    Title: West Coast USA-Mexico & Canada Vessel Sharing Agreement.
    Parties: Compania Sud Americana de Vapores S.A.; Hamburg S[uuml]d; 
and Compania Chilena de Navegacion Interoceania, S.A.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M 
Street, NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment would add Guatemala, Panama and the 
Caribbean Coast of Colombia to the geographic scope of the Agreement, 
increase the number of vessels used under the agreement, and revise the 
space allocations of the parties. Parties request expedited review.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: February 2, 2010.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-2566 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
A93A0911.

#### REEVE v. THE STATE.

(430 SE2d 873)

Blackburn, Judge.

The appellant, Hubert Reeve, was convicted by a jury of driving under the influence and driving with an unlawful alcohol concentration. On appeal, his sole contention is that the trial court erred in admitting the results of an intoximeter test because the state failed to show a proper foundation for admission of such evidence.

Reeve was stopped by a Lawrenceville police officer on July 3, 1991, after the officer witnessed Reeve tossing a beer bottle into the passenger compartment of another vehicle. The police officer detected the odor of alcohol about Reeve, and administered field sobriety tests which Reeve failed. An alcosensor test was also positive. The officer then arrested Reeve, advised him of his rights under the implied consent law, and subsequently administered an intoximeter test which indicated a blood alcohol content of .14 percent.

At the trial on June 9, 1992, the arresting officer testified that he was certified by the Georgia Department of Public Safety to operate the Intoximeter 3000 machine when he administered the test on Reeve, and that he had shown his permit to Reeve at that time. The *518officer’s current permit, valid for 1992 through 1993, was admitted into evidence. Reeve contends that the state thus failed to show a proper foundation for the admission of the intoximeter results by not producing the officer’s permit that was in effect for 1991.

Decided April 20, 1993.

*Fletcher W. Griffin III,*for appellant.

*Gerald N. Blaney, Jr., Solicitor, Richard E. Thomas, Assistant Solicitor,*for appellee.

However, there is no requirement that the state produce the actual permit held by the administering officer at the time of the test, before the results of an intoximeter test may be admitted. *Clarke v. State,*170 Ga. App. 852 (319 SE2d 16) (1984). “The officer’s testifying as to his authority to operate the machine in question was sufficient. [Cits.]” *Williamson v. State,*194 Ga. App. 439, 441 (5) (390 SE2d 658) (1990). Accordingly, the trial court properly admitted the intoximeter results over Reeve’s objection.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*McMurray, P. J., and Johnson, J., concur.*
Exhibit 4.19  RIDER NO. 2 TO THE P30 CDISCOUNT PICK-UP POINT CONTRACT  The company CDISCOUNT, a Limited Company with capital of 5,162,154.62, the head offices of which are located at 120-126 Quai de Bacalan, 33000 Bordeaux, registered in the Business and Companies Registry of Bordeaux under number 424 059 822,  Represented by Mr. Emmanuel GRENIER, CEO, duly authorized for the purposes of this document,  Hereinafter known as CDISCOUNT,  Party of the first part,  AND  The company DISTRIBUTION CASINO FRANCE, Société par Actions Simplifiée (a simplified joint-stock company) with capital of 106,758,801, the head offices of which are located at 1 Esplanade de France, 42000 Saint-Etienne, registered in the Business and Companies Registry of Saint-Etienne under number 428 268 023,  Represented by Mr. Gérard WALTER, duly authorized for the purposes of this document,  Hereinafter known as DCF,  Party of the second part,  with CDISCOUNT and DCF hereinafter known as the Party or Parties.  WHEREAS:  The Parties have signed a P30 CDISCOUNT PICK-UP POINT CONTRACT, effective since January 1, 2009, according to which DCF provides the service known as a Withdrawal Point on behalf of CDISCOUNT for the customers of the latter in its stores.  The Parties have extended the duration of this 10-year contract via Rider No. 1, effective since June 1, 2014.  The Contract and Rider No. 1 will hereinafter together be known as the Contract.  Because the parties decided to make changes to the price of the services provided by DCF to CDISCOUNT, considering market conditions, the Parties have agreed to sign this Rider No. 2.  HAVING STATED THE AFOREMENTIONED, THE FOLLOWING CLAUSES WERE AGREED TO:  ARTICLE 1.  Article 7.1 Price of the Contract is being removed and replaced by Article 7.1 Price as follows:  CDISCOUNT pays DCF eight euros and fifty cents excluding taxes (8.50 excluding taxes) for each package received by each Store and correctly reported in the computer applications for tracking packages.


This amount constitutes a lump sum payment that is complete and final: it covers all of the services provided by DCF and its stores pursuant to the Contract. No additional payment will be paid by CDISCOUNT.  ARTICLE 2.  This rider is retroactively effective to January 1, 2014.  The other provisions of the Contract, which have not been amended by this Rider No. 2, remain in effect and fully applicable.  As a consequence of the provisions of this rider, the Parties will make the necessary financial and accounting adjustments.  Signed in Bordeaux, December 19, 2014, with 2 copies.  For   CDISCOUNT

ForDISTRIBUTION CASINO FRANCEEmmanuel   GRENIER, CEO

Gérard   WALTER, CEO/s/   Emmanuel Grenier

/s/   Gérard Walter
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 5, 2022

No. 04-22-00161-CR

Brandon Joshua VIGIL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 454th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20-06-13648-CR

Honorable Daniel J. Kindred, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant was initially represented by Courtney Dailey, court-appointed counsel from the 

Hill Country Regional Public Defender’s Office. On April 26, 2022, retained counsel Daniel De 

La Garza and Dayna L. Jones filed notices of appearance to represent Appellant on appeal. 

Subsequently, Courtney Dailey filed a motion to withdraw as appellate counsel.

Courtney Dailey’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. 

We direct the clerk of this court to update this court’s records accordingly. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of May, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62792-62806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25549]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 10-20, 10-23, and 10-42]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notifications

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of three section 36(b)(1) arms sales notifications to fulfill the 
requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164, dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following are copies of letters to the 
Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 10-20, 10-23, and 
10-42 with associated attachments.

    Dated: October 6, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

Transmittal No. 10-20

    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 10-20 with attached transmittal and policy 
justification.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[[Page 62793]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13OC10.096


[[Page 62794]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13OC10.097


[[Page 62795]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13OC10.098

Transmittal No. 10-23

    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 10-23 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and sensitivity of technology.

[[Page 62796]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13OC10.099


[[Page 62797]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13OC10.100

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13OC10.101


[[Page 62798]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13OC10.102


[[Page 62799]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13OC10.103


[[Page 62800]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13OC10.104


[[Page 62801]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13OC10.105


[[Page 62802]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13OC10.106

Transmittal No. 10-42

    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 10-42 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and sensitivity of technology.

[[Page 62803]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13OC10.107


[[Page 62804]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13OC10.108


[[Page 62805]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13OC10.109


[[Page 62806]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13OC10.110

[FR Doc. 2010-25549 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Edon LEVINE.

No. 2010-KK-2170.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 28, 2010.

In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. D, No. 496-930; to the *281Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-1056.

Denied.

VICTORY, GUIDRY and CLARK, JJ„ would grant.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 807 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 807

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the Medicare 
    outpatient rehabilitation therapy caps, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2017

  Mr. Paulsen (for himself, Mr. Kind, Mrs. Blackburn, Ms. Matsui, Mr. 
Meehan, Ms. DelBene, Mrs. Radewagen, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Ellison, Mr. 
Ruppersberger, Mr. Cicilline, Mrs. Comstock, Ms. Jenkins of Kansas, Mr. 
Stewart, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Murphy of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
   Carter of Georgia, Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, Ms. 
McCollum, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, Mr. Joyce of Ohio, Mr. Blumenauer, 
Mr. Barletta, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Foster, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Carson of 
   Indiana, Mr. Swalwell of California, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Larson of 
Connecticut, Ms. Slaughter, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Ms. Frankel of Florida, 
  Ms. Brownley of California, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Pocan, Mrs. Wagner, Mr. 
Heck, Ms. Judy Chu of California, Mr. Marino, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. 
 Langevin, Mr. Costello of Pennsylvania, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, 
Mr. Abraham, Mr. Lowenthal, and Mr. Poliquin) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 
  in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the Medicare 
    outpatient rehabilitation therapy caps, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Access to Rehabilitation 
Services Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. OUTPATIENT THERAPY CAP REPEAL.

    (a) In General.--Section 1833 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395l) is amended by striking subsection (g).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to services furnished after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.2

     Schedule of Additional Employee Retention Agreements

     In addition to the Employee Retention Agreement referenced in Exhibit 10.1,
Goshen  Savings  Bank  has  executed  Employee  Retention  Agreements  with  two
additional  employees.  With  the  exception  of the name  and  address  of each
individual, all the Employee Retention Agreements are identical and there are no
material  details which differ from the  agreement  included as Exhibit 10.1. In
accordance with SEC Rule 12b-31 and Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation S-K,
the following schedule identifies the two other employees.

1.  Barbara Carr
2.  Jennifer Terpstra

     Note that the agreement  with Richard  Burch  referenced in Exhibit 10.2 of
the Registrant's report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1997 is no
longer effective, as Mr. Burch has retired.
J. 

Having reviewed this petition and the supporting documents, 

we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that our intervention by 

way of extraordinary relief is warranted. NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. 

at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED.' 

Parrakuirre 

cc: Chief Judge, The Ninth Judicial District Court 

Hon. Charles M. McGee, Senior Judge 

Law Office of Karen L. Winters 

Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg 

Douglas County Clerk 

'We deny as moot petitioner's motion for a stay of the district court's 

order. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 194 (Thursday, October 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25307]



[[Page 62121]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Proposed Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, 
Department of Energy.

ACTION: Proposed subsequent arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is being issued under the authority of Section 131 
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160). The 
Department is providing notice of a proposed subsequent arrangement 
under the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear 
Energy Between the Government of the United States and the European 
Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) and the Agreement for Cooperation 
Between the United States and Japan Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear 
Energy.
    This subsequent arrangement concerns the retransfer of 573 g of 
U.S.-origin uranium (2 g U-235) and 10 g of plutonium, contained in 50 
irradiated fuel rod segments, from Studsvik Nuclear AB, Nyk[ouml]ping, 
Sweden, to the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), Tokai-Mura, Japan. 
The material, which is currently located at Studsvik, will be 
transferred to the JAEA Research Reactor for ramp test and post-
irradiation examination. These rod segments have been irradiated in 
various European power plants under project ALPSII, and collected and 
prepared by the Hot Cell Laboratory at Studsvik. Upon completion of the 
analysis, the material will remain in Japan.
    In accordance with Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement will 
not be inimical to the common defense and security.
    This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than October 
22, 2010.

    Dated: October 1, 2010.

    For the Department of Energy.
Thomas P. D'Agostino,
Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-25307 Filed 10-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Industrial Minerals Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert Dinning, Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

March 31, 2008                     /s/ Robert Dinning
                                   ------------------
                                   Robert Dinning
                                   Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>