alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert ROBERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHELAN COUNTY, a corporate body in the State of Washington; Chelan County Jail, a corporate body in the State of Washington; Tim Parks, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 98-36043.

D.C. No. CV-97-00318-WFN.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 2000.

Decided Jan. 8, 2001.

Before ALARCÓN, FERGUSON, McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The memorandum disposition which was filed November 9, 2000 is amended and therefore the petition for rehearing is denied.

AMENDED MEMORANDUM1

Robert Roberson appeals the district court’s amended judgment setting aside the jury award of $231,000 and awarding nominal damages in the amount of $1.00 on his claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that Che-lan County and Chelan County Jail violated his civil rights by failing to protect him during his incarceration. He also appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration of the above judgment, *656and the district court’s order denying his motion for attorney’s fees. Because Roberson’s appeal of the amended judgment is dispositive, we need not address the other claims at this time.

This court reviews the district court’s grant of a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law *de novo. Weiner v. San Diego County,*210 F.3d 1025,1028 (9th Cir.2000).

Judgment as a matter of law is proper if the evidence, construed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party permits only one reasonable conclusion, and that conclusion is contrary to the jury’s verdict. *Gilbrook v. City of Westminster,*177 F.3d 839, 864 (9th Cir.1999).

The jury in this case gave two contradictory answers to special interrogatories: in one answer they found no proximate causation for Appellees’ deliberate indifference, and in another they found proximate causation for Appellees’ violation of Roberson’s civil rights. The district court focused on the first answer, suggesting that without a finding of proximate causation for deliberate indifference, there could be no award in the failure to protect claim. The district court did not suggest that it would have been unreasonable for the jury to find proximate causation for deliberate indifference, simply that they did not do so.

At the same time, the jury also found that sufficient proximate causation existed. This is inherent in its conclusion that compensatory damages should be awarded for the deprivation of civil rights proximately caused by Chelan County and Chelan County Jail.

Because the jury answers cannot be reconciled, the district court erred in awarding nominal damages. We reverse and remand for a new trial on Roberson’s federal failure to protect claim.

1

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7205

JOVON DAVIS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

STEVE CLEAR, Director of Abingdon Regional Jail; MANDI 

SMITH, Mental Health Specialist,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (7:15-cv-00331-JLK-RSB)

Submitted: January 30, 2017 Decided: February 9, 2017

Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jovon Davis, Appellant Pro Se. John Chadwick Johnson, FRITH, 

ANDERSON & PEAKE, PC, Roanoke, Virginia; Mary Hutcheson Priddy, 

GOODMAN ALLEN DONNELLY, PLLC, Glen Allen, Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jovon Davis appeals the district court’s order granting 

defendants’ motions to dismiss and for summary judgment and 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Davis v. Clear, No. 7:15-cv-00331-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. 

Aug. 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
(logo)usbank

 

 

Global Corporate Trust

190 S. LaSalle Street, 7thFloor

MK-IL-SL7C

Chicago, IL 60603

 

usbank.com

 

**Annual Statement of Compliance**

**Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.,**

**Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC21**

 

*VIA: EMAIL*

 

Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

390 Greenwich Street, 7thFloor

New York, New York 10013

Attention: Richard Simpson

telecopy number: (646)328-2943

e-mail: richard.simpson@citi.com 

 

Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

388 Greenwich Street, 17thFloor

New York, New York 10013

Attention: Ryan M. O’Connor

telecopy number: (646)862-8988

e-mail: ryan.m.oconnor@citi.com 

 

GS Mortgage Securities CorporationII, as Depositor for

GS Mortgage SecuritiesCorporation II, 

Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC20

& GS Mortgage SecuritiesCorporation II, 

Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC22

200 West Street

New York, New York 10282

Attention: Leah Nivison

Email: leah.nivison@gs.com

 

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Certificate Administrator for

GS Mortgage SecuritiesCorporation II, 

Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC20

& GS Mortgage SecuritiesCorporation II, 

Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC22

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, Maryland 21045

Email:  trustadministrationgroup@wellsfargo.com

Email:  cts.sec.notifications@wellsfargo.com

Attention: SEC Notifications

 

 

Re:           Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated asof May 1, 2014 (the “Agreement”) between Citigroup Commercial MortgageSecurities Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as theMaster Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as the Special Servicer, Park Bridge LenderServices LLC, as the Operating Advisor, and U.S. Bank National Association, asthe Certificate Administrator and Trustee.

 

I,Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association,as Certificate Administrator, as a certifying servicer hereby certify that:

 

        (1) A review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator during thepreceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of the performanceof the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement has been made under mysupervision; and

 

         (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the CertificateAdministrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout such Reporting Period. 

 

 

Capitalized terms used but notdefined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

 

 

Date: March 1, 2019

 

 

U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Certificate Administrator

 

 

By: /s/ Kimberly O Jacobs

Kimberly O. Jacobs

Senior Vice President
584 A.2d 223

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. VICTOR HINDS.

May 21, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                           9,932
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                       420
<INVENTORY>                                     12,999
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,529
<PP&E>                                           5,105
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,850
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,364
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,505
<SALES>                                         19,958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,958
<CGS>                                           15,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,923
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,463
<INCOME-TAX>                                       459
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,004
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,004
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Berry CHANDLER.

No. 2010-KP-0455.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. B, Nos. 04-M3027, 01-F0230, 04-M3029, 04-M3028; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 45341-KW, 45342-KW, 45343-KW, 45344-KW.

Denied.

CLARK, J., recused.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merix Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 27, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Mark R. Hollinger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated January 6, 2005 |  | /s/ Mark R. Hollinger  
|                      |  | Mark R. Hollinger      
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
584 A.2d 212

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MELVIN CLARK.

May 7, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### The TRAILER OUTLET, INC., Esther Layerle, and Robert R. Layerle v. William J. DUTEL and Dutel & Tranchina, LLC.

No. 2010-C-2081.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re: Dutel & Tranchina, LLC; Dutel, William J. et al.; —Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 2006-11350; to the *391Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 CA 2139.

Denied.

KNOLL, J., would grant the writ.
137 N.J. 133

#### IN THE MATTER OF TERENCE O’BRIEN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

August 17, 1994.

ORDER

TERENCE O’BRIEN of ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that TERENCE O’BRIEN is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by TERENCE O’BRIEN, pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6, shall be restrained from disbursement except upon application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSURANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Synthorx, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2018, to which this Certification is attached, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company herby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

The undersigned have executed this Certification effective as of March 12, 2019.

 

 

|   | /s/ Laura Shawver, Ph.D.                                                                              |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Laura Shawver, Ph.D.

President, Chief Executive Officer and Directors

(Principal Executive Officer) |
|   |                                                                                                  |
|   | /s/ Tighe Reardon                                                                                     |
|   | Tighe Reardon

Acting Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)                          |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
648 A.2d 703

#### IN THE MATTER OF LOUIS F. WILDSTEIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 7, 1994.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Supreme Court, recommending that LOUIS F. WILDSTEIN of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, be publicly reprimanded for violating *RPC*1.1(a) (gross neglect), *RPC*1.3 (lack of diligence) and *RPC*1.4 (failure to communicate), and further recommending that respondent practice under the supervision of a proctor for a period of one year and be examined as to his fitness to practice law by a psychiatrist approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and LOUIS F. WILD-STEIN is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

*49ORDERED that respondent practice law under the supervision of a proctor approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of one year and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be examined by a psychiatrist approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a report regarding respondent’s fitness to practice law; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Office of Attorney Ethics and the Disciplinary Review Board for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
585 A.2d 397

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN GUTTILLA.

October 16, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

HERITAGEOAKS BANCORP

 

QuarterlyReport on Form 10QSBfor the Quarter ended September 30, 2002

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002

 

 

The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp(the “Company”), hereby certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB forthe quarter ended September 30, 2002, as filed by the Company with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Quarterly Report”), to which thisCertification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements ofSection 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information containedin this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  October 8, 2002 | /s/ Lawrence P. Ward                  |   |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                         | Lawrence P. Ward,                     |
|                         | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
585 A.2d 350

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THOMAS MURRAY.

July 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 240 *N.J.Super.*378, 573 A.2d 488)
Exhibit 4.8


 


FORM 51-102F3


MATERIAL CHANGE REPORT


UNDER NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 51-102


 


		Item 1.	Name and Address
of Company



 


Field Trip Health Ltd. (the "Company")


30 Duncan Street, Suite 401


Toronto, Ontario M5V 2C3


 


		Item 2.	Date of Material
Change



 


July 29, 2021


 


		Item 3.	News Release



 


A news release dated July 27, 2021 was
disseminated via GlobeNewswire. Copy of the news release have been filed on SEDAR and is available at www.sedar.com.


 


		Item 4.	Summary of Material
Change



 


The Company announced on July 27, 2021
that it has received final approval from The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC ("NASDAQ") to list its common shares on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market. The Company’s shares will begin trading at market open on Thursday, July 29, 2021 with the ticker symbol FTRP.


 


		Item 5.	Full Description
of Material Change



 


The Company’s common stock will
continue to trade in Canada on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") under its current symbol FTRP; and concurrent with
the listing of Field Trip’s common shares on NASDAQ in the US, the shares will cease to be quoted on the OTCQX. The Company has
previously completed the process to ensure its shares are eligible for electronic clearing and settlement through the Depository Trust
Company ("DTC").


 


Concurrent with the listing, Ronan Levy
and Ellen Lubman will join the compensation committee and Mujeeb Jafferi and Dr. Ryan Yermus will resign as directors of the Company.
Mr. Jafferi and Dr. Yermus will continue to serve as Field Trip’s Chief Operating Officer and Chief Clinical Officer, respectively.


 


		Item 6.	Reliance on
subsection 7.1(2) of National Instrument 51-102



 


Not applicable.


 


		Item 7.	Omitted Information



 


Not applicable.


 


		Item 8.	 Executive
Officer



 


For further information, please contact:


Paula Amy Hewitt


Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary


Telephone: (416) 617-6277


 


		Item 9.	Date of Report



 


July 28, 2021
585 A.2d 338

#### TO-FITNESS, INC., ETC. v. THE LEMPERT COMPANY, INC., ETC.

July 10, 1990.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
#### Samuel Earl IVORY v. STATE of Alabama.

CR-09-1767.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 5, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 19, 2010.

Certiorari Denied Aug. 5, 2011 Alabama Supreme Court 1100256.

*1220Samuel Earl Ivory, pro se.

Troy King, atty. gen., and Yvonne A.H. Saxon, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

WELCH and MAIN, JJ„ concur. KELLUM, J., concurs specially, with opinion. WISE, P.J., and WINDOM, J., concur in the result.

KELLUM, Judge,

concurring specially.

I write specially to note that this action appears to be Ivory’s sixth Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition challenging his 1995 convictions. Ivory has raised nearly identical challenges to his indictment in at least five of these Rule 32 petitions. I believe that allowing Ivory to file unlimited petitions for postconviction relief in which he repeatedly raises the same issues wastes scarce judicial resources. Given the number of Rule 32 petitions filed by Ivory and the nature of the claims made in those petitions, I would encourage the circuit court to adopt sanctions pursuant to *Peoples v. State,*531 So.2d 323 (Ala.Crim.App.1988), and *Procup v. Strickland,*792 F.2d 1069 (11th Cir.1986), to prevent future frivolous litigation on the part of Ivory. *See Ex parte Thompson,*38 So.3d 119 (Ala.Crim.App.2009), and other cases involving similarly situated inmates.