alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, RobertB. Goergen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Blyth, Inc., certifythat:

1.                  I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Blyth, Inc.;

2.                  Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                  Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.                  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 11, 2006
| /s/ Robert B. Goergen                |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert B. Goergen                    |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
585 A.2d 355

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES DAWSON.

July 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 390

#### CARMELO ROMAN v. RUTGERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.

October 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of Reporting Requirements Submitted for OMB Review.

# SUMMARY:

                        Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to publish a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         notifying the public that the agency has made such a submission.                    

# DATES:

Submit comments on or before November 15, 2010. If you intend to comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline.

*Copies:*                         Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the Agency Clearance Officer.                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        Address all comments concerning this notice to:                         *Agency Clearance Officer,*                         Jacqueline White, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and                         *OMB Reviewer,*                         Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance Officer, (202) 205-7044.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Title:*                     SBA Direct and SBA Online Community.                

*Frequency:*                     On Occasion.                

*SBA Form Number:*                     N/A.                

*Description of Respondents:*                     SBA Web-site users.                

*Responses:*                     710,000.                

*Annual Burden:*                     4,000.                

Jacqueline White,

Chief, Administrative Information Branch.

[FR Doc. 2010-25828 Filed 10-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                   TO THE
              AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                     OF
                         TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC.

     Trico  Marine Services, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under
laws of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"),

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT:

     FIRST:    On  April  11, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Corporation
did duly adopt resolutions  setting forth a proposed amendment to the Amended
and  Restated  Certificate  of  Incorporation   of   the   Corporation   (the
"Certificate of Incorporation"), declaring said amendment to be advisable and
directing  that  the proposed amendment be submitted to a vote of the holders
of the Corporation's common stock.

     SECOND:   On  June  7,  2000,  holders  of  more  than a majority of the
Corporation's common stock voted for a proposal amending  the first paragraph
of Article IV of the Certificate of Incorporation SO THAT,  AS  AMENDED,  THE
FIRST PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE IV SHALL READ AS FOLLOWS:

          "1.   AUTHORIZED   STOCK.    The   Corporation  shall  be
          authorized to issue an aggregate of  60,000,000 shares of
          capital stock, of which 55,000,000 shall be common stock,
          $0.01  par  value  per  share (the "Common  Stock"),  and
          5,000,000 shall be Preferred  Stock,  $0.01 par value per
          share (the "Preferred Stock")."

     THIRD:    Said  amendment  was  duly  adopted  in  accordance  with  the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation  Law  of  the  State  of
Delaware.

     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  Trico  Marine  Services,  Inc.  has  caused  this
Certificate of Amendment to be executed in its corporate name by its Chairman
of the Board and attested by its Secretary, both thereto duly authorized this
8th day of June, 2000.


                                   TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC.


                                   By:  /s/ Ronald O. Palmer
                                       ---------------------------
                                            Ronald O. Palmer
                                          Chairman of the Board
Attest:

  /s/ Victor M. Perez
-----------------------------
       Victor M. Perez
          Secretary
584 A.2d 246

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT SMITH.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 370

#### NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. A.D. IN THE MATTER OF M.A.D., AN INFANT.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert H. Barghaus, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofBlyth, Inc., certify that:

 

1.                 I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Blyth, Inc.;

 

2.                 Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.                 Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.                The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                 The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: December 16, 2004

 

 
| /s/ Robert H. Barghaus                     |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert H. Barghaus                         |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
584 A.2d 224

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ERIC GLENN SEEGERS.

May 21, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1 D 2 0 2 3

- 2904

_____________________________
A CE A MERICAN I NSURANCE C OMPANY serviced by ESIS WC C LAIMS and F OX R ENT

- A

- C AR , I NC

. , Appellant s ,

v.

J ACOBY C. G RAGGS , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims. Edward Almeyda, Judge.

Date of Accident: November 8, 2022.

September 16, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
R OBERTS , B ILBREY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

William H. Rogner
, Orlando, for Appellant s

.
Kenneth B. Schwartz of Gordon & Partners, P.A.
, North Palm Beach, for Appellee.
Order entered December 8, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 01338 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF J .H. AND J.H., CHILDR EN On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296 - 30 004 - 2015



### O RDER We GRANT appellant’s December 4, 2015 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellant shall file a brief by DECEMBER 18, 2015 . We caution appellant that no further extension will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      1,490,641
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 801,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                  560,645
<INVENTORY>                                   330,253
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            2,216,348
<PP&E>                                      3,146,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                509,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              5,003,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       2,206,624
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                    10,000
<COMMON>                                      128,846
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,821,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                5,003,020
<SALES>                                       661,548
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              661,548
<CGS>                                       1,350,936
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,350,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             75,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,049,022)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,049,022)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,049,022)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)




</TABLE>
Error! Main Document Only.Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision 

before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested 

to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be 

made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 23-BG-0116

IN RE MARK E. KELLOGG

DDN:2022-D126

A Retired Member of the Bar of the 

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 340786

BEFORE: Blackburne-Rigsby, Chief Judge, and Easterly and Howard, Associate 

Judges. 

O R D E R

(FILED—April 27, 2023)

On consideration of the certified order from the state of Virginia revoking 

respondent’s law license by consent; this court’s February 24, 2023, order

suspending respondent pending disposition of this matter and directing him to show 

cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of 

Disciplinary Counsel wherein he requests that reinstatement be conditioned upon 

respondent’s reinstatement in Virginia; and it appearing that respondent has not filed 

a response or his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit, it is 

ORDERED that Mark E. Kellogg is hereby disbarred from the practice of law 

in the District of Columbia and that prior to filing a petition for reinstatement 

respondent must first be reinstated to practice law in the state of Virginia. See In re 

Sibley, 990 A.2d 483, 487-88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that there is a rebuttable 

presumption in favor of imposition of identical discipline and exceptions to this 

presumption should be rare); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) 

(explaining that a rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies 

unless one of the exceptions is established); In re Arif, 275 A.3d 889, 889-90 (D.C. 

2022) (“[T]he equivalent sanction for revocation in the District is disbarment[.]”) 

(citation omitted); see also In re Hoffman, 267 A.3d 1016 (D.C. 2022) (conditioning 

eligibility to seek reinstatement on readmission in original disciplining jurisdiction). 

It is 
No. 23-BG-0116

FURTHER ORDERED that, for purposes of reinstatement, Mr. Kellogg’s

disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully 

complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g). 

PER CURIAM
#### W. Dorrean GRAVES, aka W. Dorrean Graves Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lorraine DUGANNE et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 75-1231.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 6, 1980.

Jerry D. Anker, Lichtman, Abeles, Anker & Nagle, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellant.

Lawrence Wright, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees.

Before CHAMBERS and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and CONTI,* District judge.

*

The Honorable Samuel Conti, United States California, sitting by designation.

ORDER OF REMAND.

This case now on rehearing is remanded to the district court with the suggestion that that court vacate the judgment or judgments in the case on proof of performance of the settlement agreement of May 15, 1980. The trial court is authorized to dismiss with prejudice. The parties will bear their own costs.

The court acknowledges that the majority opinion, *Graves v. Duganne,*581 F.2d 222 (9th Cir. 1978), was vitiated by the Supreme Court opinion in *Carey v. Piphus,*435 U.S. 247, 98 S.Ct. 1042, 55 L.Ed.2d 252 (1978).

Any party may move for reconsideration of the foregoing order within 14 days from the date of filing herein.

District Judge for the Northern District of
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 
  





 
 00010543C1MVBF I COlICUSIC0000016284 I CAPIN10263100262501111 I THIS CERTIFIES that is the owner of MVB Financial Corp. ORGANIZED UNDER
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA COMMON STOCK COMPUTERSHARE SHAREHOLDER SERVICES INC <SPECIMEN CERTIFICATE> 250 ROYALL ST CANTON MA 02021 **ONE** CUSIP 553810 10 2 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS ************1***** *************1****
**************1*** ***************1** ****************1* sik sp Fr! lie rno FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $1.00 PER SHARE OF MVB Financial Corp. transferable only on the
books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers and its Corpoeatc seal to be here unto affixed. DATED:
08-DEC-2015 e6Tnua)i SECRETARY w a n ci,9/ (112 0 R,1)., SEAC(\ 2004 sT v tigo\ CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 31,1111VNOIS 03Z11:10KUIV ›33 ZZ mm mm om (7,› mm
›z 13 -I M. BURR KEIM. PHILA. 












 



 
 SPECIMEN The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they
were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM—as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT- CJstodiail TEN ENT—as tenants by the entireties (Gust) (Minor) JT TEN—as
joint tenants with right of under Uniform Gifts ‘o Miners survivorship and not as tenants Act in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For Value Received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irarvocably
constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated.’ X X THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST C.-.D:lrES.I’OND WITH THE
NAME(S) NOTICE: AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHAT7VER Signature(s) Guaranteed BY: THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS,
STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
585 A.2d 403

#### GILBERT, GILBERT & SCHLOSSBERG v. VERONICA C. FERRETT.

October 16, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.