alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.48  Annex 3  To the Cash Pooling Agreement  Act of accession  Polca,5 Place du Champ de Mars, 1050 Brussels, Belgium,  For the attention of the CEO,  Re: Accession to the Polca Cash Pooling Agreement (the Agreement) of Cdiscount Group (the participating Company)  1.All terms used herein shall have the same meaning as defined in the Agreement.  2.Cdiscount Group confirms having received and read all the provisions of the Agreement as well as any other information, document considered useful and necessary for the Agreement and its implementation.  3.Cdiscount Group states to be controlled directly or indirectly by Casino Guichard Perrachon in the sense referred to in the definition of the term Casino Group found in Article 1 of the Agreement.  4.Cdiscount Group confirms having provided Polca with its latest legal financial statements, including financial information on its equity and its financial debts, in accordance with Article 6.2 of the Agreement, on the basis of which the Maximum Amount of Advances is set to 50 million (Fifty million) euros.  5.Cdiscount Group hereby agrees to be a Participating Company within the meaning of the Agreement, endorses each of the declarations provided for in Article 9 of the Agreement, agrees to be bound without reservation by the terms and conditions of the Agreement, to benefit from all the rights it creates and engages to perform all the obligations imposed upon it.  6.For the purpose of participating in the cash pooling transactions provided for in the Agreement, Cdiscount Group states that the account No. FR76 3000 3018 4000 0201 4787 673 opened with the Bank should be considered as its Secondary Account for the purposes of the Agreement.  7.We confirm having the authority and capacity to sign the Act of accession to the Agreement.  8.Please note that all correspondence relating to the Agreement will be sent by post, fax, email or telephone to:  ·Adrien Boute ·1 Esplanade de France - 42008 Saint-Etienne ·Email: aboute@groupe-casino.fr ·Telephone: 04 77 45 36 97


For the purposes of Articles 3 and 4 of the Agreement, only the person below or the substitute will exclusively have the capacity and the authority to represent us:  ·Emmanuel Grenier ·1 Esplanade de France - 42008 Saint-Etienne  9.As we have negotiated and agreed, we have noted that, for us, the date of entry into force of the agreement is fixed as October 17, 2014.  For the sake of good order, please return to us one of the two originals of this Annex, with your handwritten signature preceded by the words read and approved.   Kind   regards,Executed   on October 17, 2014Cdiscount   Groupby   Emmanuel Grenier/s/   Emmanuel Grenier
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,213
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (499)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,881
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,760
<PP&E>                                          28,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,282)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,239
<BONDS>                                         81,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,014
<SALES>                                         41,128
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,128
<CGS>                                           25,623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,247
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,177
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,070
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,070
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.04
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6043

LEVI BURGESS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DANIEL T. MAHON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-1100-AM)

Submitted: August 11, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998

Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Levi Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Levi Burgess seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Burgess v. Mahon, No. CA-97-1100-AM

(E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 1997). We find meritless Burgess’s claim that his

attorney rendered ineffective assistance of counsel because he

failed to argue that the Kannapolis, North Carolina, police department did not have jurisdiction to serve the search warrant at

his residence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
CV Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                    
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 8, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ LOUIS G. LANGE, M.D., PH.D.                    
|                        |  |  |  | Louis G. Lange, M.D., Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer
Opinion filed June 21 , 201 2



## In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________



### No. 11

- 11

- 00244

- C V

__________

KEITH THOMAS , Appellant

V.

SHERRY DICKINSON ET AL

. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 259th District Court

Jones County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 022488

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a fi nal judgment signed on July 13 , 2011. We dismiss the appeal

for want of prosecution

.

The clerk’s record and the reporter’s record were filed in this court on April 9, 2012.

Appellant , Keith Thomas, was notified by a written letter dated April 13, 201 2 , that his brief was

due for filing on or before May 14, 2012 . Appellant did not file his brief on or before May 14

,

2012. On May 29, 2012, the clerk of this court advised appellant in writing that his brief was

past due. The clerk further informed appellant that

, on its own motion, th e court had granted him2

an extension until June 13, 2012

, to file his brief . The clerk’s letter of May 29, 2012, further

advised appellant that the failure to file his brief by June 13, 2012, might result in his appeal

being dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8 and 42. There has be en

no response to the clerk’s letter of May 29, 2012

. The failure to timely file appellant’s brief appears to be due to appellant’s acts and

omissions. Therefore, pursuant to Rules 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b), the appeal is dismissed for want

of prosecution.

PER CURIAM

June 21 , 2012

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Kalenak , J.
#### In re Stephen V. VALLOT.

No. 2011-OB-0101.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 19, 2011.

In re Vallot, Stephen V.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Petition for Transfer to Disability Inactive Status.

Granted.
EXHIBIT 32



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Cecil A. Brooks does hereby certify that the Annual Report of Cornerstone Ministries Investments, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 27, 2006.

/s/ Cecil A. Brooks, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



John T. Ottinger, does hereby certify that the Annual Report of Cornerstone Ministries Investments, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 27, 2006.

/s/ John T. Ottinger, Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer









34
#### STATE ex rel. Emmitt JONES v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2009-KH-2669.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Jones, Eramitt; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of West Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 09-WFLN-260; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 CW 1811.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   (A)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
 (B)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
   August 16,
2010
 Date
    
    /s/ David T. Stoner

David T. Stoner
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Merix Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the 13-week period
ended August 26, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark R. Hollinger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Mark R. HollingerMark R. Hollinger Chief Executive Officer
October 10, 2006
----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Yoav Doppelt               |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Name: Yoav Doppelt             |   |
| Title: Chief Executive Officer |   |
| Date: April 19, 2017           |   |
|                           |   |
|                           |   |
| /s/ Tzahi Goshen               |   |
| Name: Tzahi Goshen             |   |
| Title: Chief Financial Officer |   |
| Date: April 19, 2017           |   |

----
No. 13,572.

#### Schultheis *v.*The Town of Garrett.

Filed March 28, 1889.

From the DeKalb Circuit Court.

*W. L. Penfield,*for appellant.

*E. D. Hartman*and *L. Covell,*for appellee.

Mitchell, J.

Upon the authority of *Wagner*v. *Town of Garrett, ante,*p. 114, the judgment in this cause is affirmed, with costs.
#### STATE ex rel. Bobbie Jean HAGINS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1232.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re Hagins, Bobbie Jean; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 5, No. 258,170; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,-500-KH.

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62891-62892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25644]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permit Applications Received Under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-541)

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of Permit Applications Received under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permit applications received to conduct activities regulated 
under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. NSF has published 
regulations under the Antarctic Conservation Act at Title 45 Part 670 
of the Code of Federal Regulations. This is the required notice of 
permit applications received.

DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit written data, comments, 
or views with respect to this permit application by November 12, 2010. 
This application may be inspected by interested parties at the Permit 
Office, address below.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Permit Office, Room 755, 
Office of Polar Programs, National

[[Page 62892]]

Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy at the above address 
or (703) 292-7405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Science Foundation, as directed 
by the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-541), as amended 
by the Antarctic Science, Tourism and Conservation Act of 1996, has 
developed regulations for the establishment of a permit system for 
various activities in Antarctica and designation of certain animals and 
certain geographic areas a requiring special protection. The 
regulations establish such a permit system to designate Antarctic 
Specially Protected Areas.
    The applications received are as follows:

Permit Application No. 2011-020.

1. Applicant: Morton Beebe, 150 Lombard Street <greek-i>808, San 
Francisco, CA 94111.

Activity for Which Permit Is Requested

    Enter and Antarctic Specially Protected Area. The applicant plans 
to produce a documentary film and book exploring the immense changes to 
Antarctic habitation and science during the past have century. The 
applicant plans to enter this historic huts at: ASPA <greek-i>155--Cape 
Evans, Ross Island (Scott's Hut); ASPA <greek-i>157--Backdoor Bay, Cape 
Royds (Shackleton's Hut); and ASPA <greek-i>159--Hut Point, Ross Island 
(Discovery Hut) to videotape, photograph, and audio record the 
interiors and exteriors of the huts.

Location

    ASPA <greek-i>155--Cape Evans, Ross Island (Scott's Hut); ASPA 
<greek-i>157--Backdoor Bay, Cape Royds (Shackleton's Hut); and, ASPA 
<greek-i>159--Hut Point, Ross Island (Discovery Hut).

Dates

    November 1, 2010 to February 28, 2011.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Office, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010-25644 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 98-6220 ERIC ARTHUR WALTON, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-94-21) Submitted: April 28, 1998 Decided: May 19, 1998 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Jay Thornton McCamic, MCCAMIC & MCCAMIC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellant. Paul Thomas Camilletti, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Eric Walton appeals the district court order denying his motion fora new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Walton was convicted of drug charges in 1994. During his trial he and another individual attempted to bribe one of the jurors. The improper contact resulted in Walton's 1997 conviction for jury tampering. Walton now alleges that during the course of his jury tampering trial he learned new information about the activities of the jury that convicted him in his 1994 trial. B ecause we find that Walton fails to show that this new information calls into question the actual fairness of his trial, we affirm. A district court's denial of a motion for a new trial will not be set aside absent an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Campbell , 977 F.2d 854, 860 (4th Cir. 1992). Generally, a defendant seeking anew trial based on newly discovered evidence must show that the evidence is such that, on a new trial, it would probably produce an acquittal. United States v. Chavis , 880 F.2d 788, 793 (4th Cir. 1989) (citing United States v. Bales , 813 F.2d 1289, 1295 (4th Cir. 1987)).While we recognize that the type of newly discovered evidence Walton has uncovered does not fit squarely with this requirement, see United States v. Smith , 62 F.3d 641, 650 (4th Cir. 1995), we find thatWalton still must make a showing that the "newly discovered evidence" undermined the integrity and reliability of his conviction. See United States v. Endicott , 869 F.2d 452, 457 (9th Cir. 1989) (requiring defendant to establish actual prejudice resulting from an improper juror contact in order to receive a new trial). Due to the overwhelming evidence of Walton's guilt at his 1994 trial we find that Walton has failed to make such a showing. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order denying his motion for a new trial. We dispense with oral argument because the
2facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3
#### Col. Paul Emmett TOWRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES of America, Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 78-3082.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 3, 1980.

Harry S. Redmon, Jr., Harry A. Rosenberg, Margaret Ann Brown, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

John P. Volz, U.S. Atty., Robert L. Boese, Asst. U.S. Atty., Leonard P. Avery, New Orleans, La., for U.S.A. and Harold Brown and Thomas C. Reed.

Before TUTTLE, RANDALL and TATE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed on the basis of the district court’s opinion, which is published at 459 F.Supp. 101 (E.D.La.1978).

We were troubled by the suggestion at oral argument that payment of the amount determined by the Secretary of the Air Force as compensation for Col. Towry’s injuries was conditioned upon his not seeking judicial review of the award. We have been informed by letter from the Acting Chief of the Claims and Tort Litigation Staff of the Office of the Judge Advocate General that the compensation award to which the Secretary of the Air Force determined Col. Towry was entitled is still open, and that Col. Towry may accept the tendered amount in satisfaction of his claim.

AFFIRMED.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2014, by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-GC22 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.                                                                                                                                                                                         (logo) Together we’ll go far