alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25540]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated March 10, 2008, and published in the Federal 
Register on March 19, 2008 (73 FR 14841), Chemica, Inc., 316 West 130th 
Street, Los Angeles, California 90061, made application by letter to 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of methamphetamine (1105), a basic class of controlled 
substance listed in schedule II.
    The above-listed controlled substance is an intermediate in the 
manufacture of Benzphetamine, a schedule III non-narcotic controlled 
substance. The methamphetamine will not be sold as a commercial product 
in the domestic market.
    A comment and objection was received. However, after a thorough 
review of this matter, DEA has concluded that issues raised in the 
comment and objection do not warrant the denial of this application.
    DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined 
that the registration of Chemica, Inc. to manufacture the listed basic 
class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest at 
this time. DEA has investigated Chemica, Inc. to ensure that the 
company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 
21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a 
bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.

    Dated: October 5, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-25540 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### In re Randal Lee MENARD.

No. 2010-B-1798.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 24, 2010.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM*

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent collected an excessive fee, causing harm to his client. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Randal Lee Menard, Louisiana Bar Roll number 20960, be, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day, fully deferred.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall pay full restitution to his former client, with legal interest, as set forth in the petition for consent discipline.

*272IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

*

 Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Senesco Technologies, Inc.for the year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof, the undersigned, Joel Brooks, Chief FinancialOfficer and Treasurer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

(1)           The Annual Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theAnnual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Senesco Technologies, Inc.

 
| Dated:   September 26, 2008 | /s/ Joel Brooks *                             |
|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                       | Joel Brooks                                   |
|                                       | Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer        |
|                                       | (principal financial and  accounting officer) |

 

----

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph M. BREAUX.

No. 2010-KO-2720.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2011.

In re Breaux, Joseph M.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or *110Review, Parish of Lincoln, 3rd Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 56866; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No 45,-676-KA.

Denied.
Exhibit
      32.1





HERITAGE
      OAKS BANCORP




Quarterly
      Report on Form 10Q


for
      the
      Quarter ended September 30, 2005





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The
      undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the
      “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that to my
      knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended September
      30, 2005, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      (the “Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully
      complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
      Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.







Dated:
                October 19, 2005****/s/ Lawrence
                P. WardLawrence
                  P. Ward,
                President
                  and Chief Executive Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Heritage Oaks Bancorp, and will be retained
      by Heritage Oaks Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
585 A.2d 410

#### 1530 OWNERS CORPORATION v. BOROUGH OF FORT LEE.

October 30, 1990.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
(logo)**Deutsche Bank**

1761East St. Andrew Place

SantaAna, CA 92705-4934

 

Tel714 247 6000

Fax714 247 6009 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

 

COMM 2014-CCRE17

 

Theundersigned, duly authorized officers of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,as the Certificate Administrator (a "Certifying Servicer'') under thePooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2014 (the"Agreement"), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset ReceivingCorporation, as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division ofPNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC,as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of theAgreement:

 

A)     Areview of such Certifying Servicer's activities from January 1, 2018 toDecember 31, 2018 (the "reporting period") and of such CertifyingServicer's performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer'ssupervision and

B)     That,as to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, suchCertifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, inall material respects throughout the reporting period.

 

DEUTSCHEBANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

asCertificate Administrator

 

 

/s/Ronaldo Reyes

BY:Ronaldo Reyes 

Title:Vice President

Date:March 1, 2019

 

/s/Karlene Collins

BY:Karlene Collins 

Title:Assistant Vice President

Date:March 1, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25477]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New 
Hampshire, Vermont and Maine)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, November 16, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, November 16, 2010, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Marisa Knispel. 
For more information, please contact Ms. Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton 
Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: October 4, 2010.
Shawn F. Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-25477 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED FLOYD D. JOHNSON ,

Appellant ,

v. Case No. 5D 17

- 6

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND STATE OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee s

. ________________________________/

Decision filed July 21, 2017 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County , Dennis Craig , Judge. Floyd D. Johnson, Daytona Beach, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee State of Florida

. No Appearance for Appellee Department of Corrections.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE , JJ., concur. COHEN, C.J., concurs specially , with opinion.2 CASE NO. 5D17

- 6

COHEN, C.J., concurring specially.

Johnson appeals the Volusia County Circuit Court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. In his petition, Johnson attacks the validity of his Seminole County conviction, arguing that the Seminole County court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over

his case because the amended information wa s defective. Johnson’s conviction resulted in his confinement at a correctional facility in Volusia County. In general, a petition for habeas corpus must be filed in the circuit court in the county in which the petitioner is detained. Collins v. State , 859 So. 2d 1244, 1245 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). However, when a petitioner collaterally attacks the validity of his or her underlying conviction or sentence, “ jurisdiction in habeas proceedings lies with the trial court that imposed the sentence and rendered the judgment of conviction.” Id. ; see also

Batista v. State , 993 So. 2d 93, 95 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). In addition, Johnson’s claim should have been brought under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(a)(2)

– (3), which authorizes relief from a judgment or s entence entered without jurisdiction. Rule 3.850(m) limits the discretion of the court to entertain habeas petitions when the petitioner could have sought relief under rule 3.850. Thus, the trial court properly dismissed Johnson’s petition because he shoul d have filed a motion for postconviction relief in Seminole County.
NO. 07-07-0071-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	AUGUST 7, 2007

		______________________________

	ROQUE ARANDA, APPELLANT

	V.

	D. GLENN, LAW LIBRARIAN II, ET AL., APPELLEES

	_________________________________

	POTTER COUNTY, 	HONORABLE HAL MINER, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant, Roque Aranda, filed a notice of appeal from a Prefiling Order - Vexatious Litigant, entered February 14, 2007.  The clerk’s record was filed on March 6, 2007, and there is not a reporter’s record per the docketing statement filed by appellant.  By letter dated July 3, 2007,  the clerk of this court notified appellant that his brief was due June 4, 2007, but had yet to be filed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a).  The letter further advised appellant that the appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution if the brief, or a response reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief and showing that appellees had not been injured by the delay, was not filed by July 13, 2007.  No brief, motion for extension, or other response has been received.

	Accordingly, we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and failure to comply with a directive of the court.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).    

						Mackey K. Hancock

						        Justice
Micro-Integration Corp. and Subsidiaries
         Exhibit 11.1 - Statement re: Computation of Earnings Per Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Three months ended                Six months ended
                                                  September 30                      September 30
                                            1996                1995          1996                1995
                                            ----                ----          ----                ----
                                           (thousands except per share)    (thousands except per share)
                                                   (unaudited)                     (unaudited)

<S>                                           <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>  
Average shares outstanding                    2,397           2,423           2,397           2,423

Net effect of dilutive stock options
 based on the treasury stock method
 using average market price                       0               0               0               0
                                            -------         -------         -------         -------

Total                                         2,397           2,423           2,397           2,423
                                            =======         =======         =======         =======

Net Loss                                    $  (187)        $  (111)        $  (144)        $  (823)
                                            =======         =======         =======         =======

Per share amount                            $ (0.08)        $ (0.05)        $ (0.06)        $ (0.34)
                                            =======         =======         =======         =======
</TABLE>


Note: Fully diluted earnings per share equals primary earnings per share.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Kelly E. Lang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Merix Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 1, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Merix Corporation.



|                 |  |                                                     
|---------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|By:              |  | /s/ KELLY E. LANG                                   
|                 |  | Kelly E. Lang                                       
|                 |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                 |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                       
|                
|October 11, 2007
#### Johnny ROMERO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D10-862.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 22, 2010.

Johnny Romero, Lake City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to the appellant filing a sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) on the new ground for relief raised in the appellant’s motion for rehearing from his first motion, i.e., that the trial court failed to orally adjudicate appellant a habitual offender.

WARNER, FARMER and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
      32.2

















CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of South Jersey
      Gas
      Company (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
      A. Kindlick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











**SOUTH
                JERSEY GAS COMPANY**Date: March
                7, 2006
              By:
              /s/ David
                A. KindlickDavid A. KindlickTitle: 
                Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE ex rel. Tarome HARRIS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-0430.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re Harris, Taróme; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Webster, 26th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 74452; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,329-KH.

Denied.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Targeted Genetics Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, H. Stewart Parker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











August 13, 2002



/s/    H. Stewart ParkerDate



H. Stewart Parker President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Jorge ALVAREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D09-4091.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 18, 2011.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, without discussion, Alvarez’s convictions for trespass and dealing in stolen property. However, we reverse his conviction for grand theft1 because the State’s evidence was insufficient to establish that the stolen items had a value of $300 or more. *See Smith v. State,*955 So.2d 1227, 1229 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (State required to present competent evidence to prove value of stolen property at time of crime).

On remand, the trial court shall enter a judgment and sentence on Count IV on the lesser offense of petit theft of the second degree.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

ORFINGER, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

1

. §§ 812.014(1), (2)(c)l., Fla. Stat. (2008).
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-12-000066028-FEB-201310:10 AM
#### Michelle Rae SMITH v. James E. BAMBINO, Erie Insurance and Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company.

No. 2011-C-0758.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re Smith, Michelle Rae; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. J, No. 2007-16142; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-1174.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

HERITAGE OAKS BANCORP

 

Quarterly report on Form 10Q

for the quarter ended March 31, 2011

 

 

 

CERTIFICATION

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that to my knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| Dated:   May 6, 2011 | /s/   Thomas J. Tolda                          |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Thomas   J. Tolda,                             |
|                      | Executive   Vice President and Chief Financial |
|                      | And   Principal Accounting Officer             |

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Heritage Oaks Bancorp, and will be retained by Heritage Oaks Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

** **

 

Heritage Oaks Bancorp | - 74 -

----