Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 122 / Monday, June 25, 2018 / Notices 29541 

instructions to view Department of 

Commerce collections currently under 

review by OMB. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to OIRA_Submission@

omb.eop.gov. 

Sheleen Dumas, 

Departmental Lead PRA Officer, Office of the 

Chief Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2018–13513 Filed 6–22–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for clearance the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

chapter 35). 

Agency: Office of the Chief 

Information Officer, Office of the 

Secretary, Commerce. 

Title: The Research Performance 

Progress Report. 

OMB Control Number: 0690–0032. 

Form Number(s): None. 

Type of Request: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

2,550. 

Estimated Time per Response: 5 

hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 12,750. 

Needs and Uses: The development of 

the Research Performance Progress 

Report (RPPR) resulted from an 

initiative of the Research Business 

Models (RBM), an Interagency Working 

Group of the Social, Behavioral & 

Economic Research, Subcommittee of 

the Committee on Science (CoS), a 

committee of the National Science and 

Technology Council (NSTC). One of the 

RBM Subcommittee’s priority areas was 

to create greater consistency in the 

administration of Federal research 

awards. Given the increasing 

complexity of interdisciplinary and 

interagency research, it is important for 

Federal agencies to manage awards in a 

similar fashion. The RPPR is an OMB 

approved uniform format to be used by 

Federal agencies in submission of 

progress reports that support research 

and research-related activities. It is 

intended to replace other performance 

reporting formats currently in use by 

Federal agencies. However, the RPPR 

does not change the performance 

reporting requirements specified in 2 

CFR 200. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households; Business or other for-profit 

organizations; Not-for-profit 

institutions; State, Local, or Tribal 

government; Federal government. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. 

Legal Authority: The Federal 

Financial Assistance Management 

Improvement Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106– 

107), and 2 CFR 200.328. 

This information collection request 

may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov. 

Follow the instructions to view 

Department of Commerce collections 

currently under review by OMB. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to OIRA_Submission@

omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. 

Sheleen Dumas, 

Departmental Lead PRA Officer, Office of the 

Chief Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2018–13512 Filed 6–22–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–17–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–39–2018] 

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 106— 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Notification 

of Proposed Production Activity; 

Eastman Kodak Company (Printing 

Flexographic Plates); Weatherford, 

Oklahoma 

Eastman Kodak Company (Eastman 

Kodak) submitted a notification of 

proposed production activity to the FTZ 

Board for its facility in Weatherford, 

Oklahoma. The notification conforming 

to the requirements of the regulations of 

the FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was 

received on June 13, 2018. 

Eastman Kodak already has authority 

to produce flexographic finished plates, 

aluminum finished printing plates, 

thermo imaging layer, direct imaging 

recording film sheets, and direct 

imaging record film rolls within 

Subzone 106F. The current request 

would add foreign status materials/ 

components to the scope of authority. 

Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), 

additional FTZ authority would be 

limited to the specific foreign-status 

materials/components described in the 

submitted notification (as described 

below) and subsequently authorized by 

the FTZ Board. 

Production under FTZ procedures 

could exempt Eastman Kodak from 

customs duty payments on the foreignstatus materials/components used in 

export production. On its domestic 

sales, for the foreign-status materials/ 

components noted below, Eastman 

Kodak would be able to choose the duty 

rates during customs entry procedures 

that apply to finished products in the 

existing scope of authority. Eastman 

Kodak would be able to avoid duty on 

foreign-status components which 

become scrap/waste. Customs duties 

also could possibly be deferred or 

reduced on foreign-status production 

equipment. 

The materials/components sourced 

from abroad include non-aromatic esters 

of amino-acids, propylene oxidemodified trimethylol propane triacrylate 

and foamed polyethylene resin sheet 

(packaging material used between 

plates) (duty rates range from 3% to 

6.5%). 

Public comment is invited from 

interested parties. Submissions shall be 

addressed to the Board’s Executive 

Secretary at the address below. The 

closing period for their receipt is August 

6, 2018. 

A copy of the notification will be 

available for public inspection at the 

Office of the Executive Secretary, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 

21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 

Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the 

‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s 

website, which is accessible via 

www.trade.gov/ftz. 

For further information, contact 

Christopher Wedderburn at 

Chris.Wedderburn@trade.gov or (202) 

482–1963. 

Dated: June 19, 2018. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2018–13540 Filed 6–22–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–40–2018] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 9—Honolulu, 

Hawaii; Application for Reorganization 

Under Alternative Site Framework 

An application has been submitted to 

the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by 

the State of Hawaii, grantee of FTZ 9, 

requesting authority to reorganize the 

zone under the alternative site 

framework (ASF) adopted by the FTZ 

Board (15 CFR 400.2(c)). The ASF is an 

option for grantees for the establishment 

or reorganization of zones and can 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
29542 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 122 / Monday, June 25, 2018 / Notices 

1The Regulations are currently codified in the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730– 

774 (2017). The Regulations issued pursuant to the 

Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 4601–4623 

(Supp. III 2015) (available at http://

uscode.house.gov)) (‘‘EAA’’ or ‘‘the Act’’). Since 

August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the 

President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 

17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which 

has been extended by successive Presidential 

Notices, the most recent being that of August 15, 

2017 (82 FR 39005 (Aug. 16, 2017)), has continued 

the Regulations in effect under the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, 

et seq. (2012)). 

permit significantly greater flexibility in 

the designation of new subzones or 

‘‘usage-driven’’ FTZ sites for operators/ 

users located within a grantee’s ‘‘service 

area’’ in the context of the FTZ Board’s 

standard 2,000-acre activation limit for 

a zone. The application was submitted 

pursuant to the Foreign-Trade Zones 

Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), 

and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR 

part 400). It was formally docketed on 

June 18, 2018. 

FTZ 9 was approved by the FTZ 

Board on February 15, 1965 (Board 

Order 65, 30 FR 2377, February 20, 

1965); relocated on April 16, 1982 

(Board Order 188, 47 FR 18014, April 

27, 1982); and expanded on August 21, 

1987 (Board Order 359, 52 FR 33458, 

September 3, 1987), November 16, 1988 

(Board Order 399, 53 FR 47842, 

November 28, 1988), June 9, 1992 

(Board Orders 580 and 581, 57 FR 

27020, June 17, 1992), June 19, 1995 

(Board Order 751, 60 FR 33187, June 27, 

1995) and September 6, 2006 (Board 

Order 1477, 71 FR 54610, September 18, 

2006). 

The current zone includes the 

following sites: Site 1 (17 acres)—Pier 2, 

521 Ala Moana, Honolulu; Site 2 (1,033 

acres)—James Campbell Industrial Park, 

Kalaeloa Boulevard and Malakole Street, 

Ewa, Oahu; Site 3 (109 acres)—Mililani 

Technology Park, 100 Kahelu Avenue, 

Mililani, Oahu; Site 4 (60 acres)—Maui 

Research & Technology Park, 1300 N. 

Holopono Street, Kihei, Maui; Site 5 (31 

acres)—Hilo Industrial Park, 135 

Operations Street, Hilo, Hawaii; Site 6 

(27 acres)—Hawaii Fueling Facilities 

Corporation, 3201 Aolele Street, 

Honolulu, Oahu; Site 7 (7 acres)— 

Unicold Corporation, 3140 Ualena 

Street, Honolulu, Oahu; Site 8 (10 

acres)—Hawaii Convention Center, 1801 

Kalakaua Avenue, Honolulu, Oahu; and, 

Site 9 (870 acres)—Natural Energy Lab 

of Hawaii Authority, 73–4460 Queen 

Kaahumanu Highway #101, KailuaKona, Hawaii. 

The grantee’s proposed service area 

under the ASF would be the City and 

County of Honolulu, County of Hawaii, 

County of Kauai, and County of Maui, 

Hawaii, as described in the application. 

If approved, the grantee would be able 

to serve sites throughout the service area 

based on companies’ needs for FTZ 

designation. The application indicates 

that the proposed service area is within 

and adjacent to the Hilo and Kona 

(Hawaii), Kahului and Kihei (Maui), 

Honolulu (Oahu); and, Nawiliwili-Port 

Allen (Kauai) U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection ports of entry. 

The applicant is requesting authority 

to reorganize its zone to include existing 

Sites 2, 3, 4, 5 and 9 as ‘‘magnet’’ sites 

and existing Sites 1, 6, 7 and 8 as usagedriven sites. The ASF allows for the 

possible exemption of one magnet site 

from the ‘‘sunset’’ time limits that 

generally apply to sites under the ASF, 

and the applicant proposes that Site 5 

be so exempted. No additional ASF 

subzones/usage-driven sites are being 

requested at this time. The application 

would have no impact on FTZ 9’s 

previously authorized subzones. 

In accordance with the FTZ Board’s 

regulations, Christopher Kemp of the 

FTZ Staff is designated examiner to 

evaluate and analyze the facts and 

information presented in the application 

and case record and to report findings 

and recommendations to the FTZ Board. 

Public comment is invited from 

interested parties. Submissions shall be 

addressed to the FTZ Board’s Executive 

Secretary at the address below. The 

closing period for their receipt is August 

24, 2018. Rebuttal comments in 

response to material submitted during 

the foregoing period may be submitted 

during the subsequent 15-day period to 

September 10, 2018. 

A copy of the application will be 

available for public inspection at the 

Office of the Executive Secretary, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 

21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 

Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the 

‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ 

Board’s website, which is accessible via 

www.trade.gov/ftz. For further 

information, contact Christopher Kemp 

at Christopher.Kemp@trade.gov or (202) 

482–0862. 

Dated: June 19, 2018. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2018–13538 Filed 6–22–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Order Denying Export Privileges 

In the Matter of: Fuyi Sun a/k/a Frank Sun, 

Inmate Number: 77362–054, Moshannon 

Valley Correctional Institution, 555 Geo 

Drive, Philipsburg, PA 16866. 

On August 31, 2017, in the U.S. 

District Court for the Southern District 

of New York, Fuyi Sun, a/k/a Frank Sun 

(‘‘Sun’’), was convicted of violating the 

International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. 

(2012)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). Specifically, Sun 

knowingly and willfully attempted to 

export and cause to be exported from 

the United States to China Toray type 

M60JB–3000–50B carbon fiber, without 

the required U.S. Department of 

Commerce licenses. Sun was sentenced 

to 36 months in prison, with credit for 

time served and a $100 assessment. 

Section 766.25 of the Export 

Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or 

‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent 

part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of 

Exporter Services, in consultation with 

the Director of the Office of Export 

Enforcement, may deny the export 

privileges of any person who has been 

convicted of a violation of the EAA 

[Export Administration Act], the EAR, 

or any order, license or authorization 

issued thereunder; any regulation, 

license, or order issued under the 

International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18 

U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of 

the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50 

U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms 

Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15 

CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of 

the Export Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’ 

or ‘‘the Act’’), 50 U.S.C. 4610(h). The 

denial of export privileges under this 

provision may be for a period of up to 

10 years from the date of the conviction. 

15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. 

4610(h). In addition, Section 750.8 of 

the Regulations states that the Bureau of 

Industry and Security’s Office of 

Exporter Services may revoke any 

Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’) 

licenses previously issued pursuant to 

the Act or Regulations, in which the 

person had an interest in at the time of 

his/her conviction. 

BIS has received notice of Sun’s 

conviction for violating the IEEPA, and 

has provided notice and an opportunity 

for Sun to make a written submission to 

BIS, as provided in Section 766.25 of 

the Regulations. BIS has not received a 

submission from Sun. 

Based upon my review and 

consultations with BIS’s Office of 

Export Enforcement, including its 

Director, and the facts available to BIS, 

I have decided to deny Sun’s export 

privileges under the Regulations for a 

period of 10 years from the date of Sun’s 

conviction. I have also decided to 

revoke all licenses issued pursuant to 

the Act or Regulations in which Sun 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1