2008 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
8-8-2008 

# In Re: O s sie R . T

r a d P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 08-3023

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2008 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion
" In Re: O s sie R . T

r a d " (2008). 2008 D e cisio n s . P ape r 693. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008/693HL D- 1 4 5 NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

___________ N o. 08- 3023

___________ I N RE: OSS I E R. TRADER , Pet i t i oner

____________________________________ O n a Pet i t i on forW r i tof M andamus fr om t he U ni t ed St at es D i s tr i ctC our tfort he East ern D i s t r i ctof Penns y l vani a

( R el at ed t o C r i m . N o. 94- cr - 00534- 2)

____________________________________ Sub mi t t e d Pu r s ua ntt o Rul e 21 , Fe d. R. A pp . P.

J ul y31, 2008 B efor e: SC I R I C A , C hi ef J udge, A L D I SE R T and G A R T H , C i r cui tJ udges ( Fi l ed A ugus t8, 2008 )

_________ OPI NI ON O F THE COURT

_________ P E R C U R I A M. O s s i e R ober tT r ader , a fe der al pr i s oner , pet i t i ons t hi s C our tfora w r i tof
m andamus or der i ng t he D i s t r i ctC our tt o rul e on hi s “M ot i on t o D i s m i s s I ndi ct m entfor V i ol at i on of t he SpeedyT r i al A ct , ” w hi ch he f i l ed i n M ar ch 1995. T hi s i s T r ader ’ s four t h at t empt t o r evi ve hi s SpeedyT r i al A ctcl ai m s bypet i t i oni ng fora w r i tof m andamus. See, e. g. , 226 Fed A pp’ x 100; 161 Fed A pp’ x 205. O nce a gai n,
w e mustr ej ecthi s as s er t i on t hatt he mot i on has been pe ndi ng s i nce 1995. T he D i s t r i ctA n yc h a llen g e to th e g u iltyp lea m a yn o t b e b ro u g h t in a p e tit io n f o r a w rit 1 m and am us. T r aderhas al s o fi l ed a “ M ot i on Pur s uantt o R ul e 28( j ) of t he Feder al R ul es of 2 A pp el l at e P rocedu re C i t at i on of S up plem ental A uthori t i es, ” w hich m aybe co nst rued as a m ot i on t o s uppl ement the mandam us pet i t i on. W e gr antt he mot i on t o s uppl ement , but not e thatt he ar gum ent s r ai s ed ther ei n do notes t abl i s h t hathe i s el i gi bl e form andamus r el i ef. 2 C ou rtdo cket s heet s ho w s t he m oti on w as t erm i nated du e t o T rader ’s gu i l t yplea. S ee al so W as hi ngt on v. Sobi na, 475 F. 3d 162, 166 and n. 5 ( 3d C i r . 2007) ( percur i am) ( s peedy tr ial ri g h ts are w aive d b yan u n co n d it ion al an d v o lun taryg u il typ lea). 1 B eca us e t hi s i s nota s i tuat i on w her e the D i s t r i ctC our thas engage d i n “undue del ay. . . t ant amount t o a fa i l ur e t o exer ci s e j ur i s di ct i on, ” M adden v. M y er s , 102 F. 3d 74, 79 (3d C i r. 19 96 ), w e w i l l den yt he p et i t i on for a w ri tof m and am us. 2