alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John R. LOWERY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A.D. MATHEWS, Sr., Former Sheriff, County of Henrico; Michael Wade, Sheriff, County of Henrico, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-1812.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 29, 2000.

Decided Jan. 12, 2001.

Robert P. Geary, Richmond, VA, for appellant. Sharon Maitland Moon, LeClair Ryan, P.C., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

John R. Lowery, Jr., appeals the district court’s order declining to reconsider its final order dismissing his employment discrimination action and denying his motion to file a second amended complaint. We have reviewed the district court’s order and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. The district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to grant relief from its final order under either Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) or Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). *See Brown v. French,*147 F.3d 307, 310 (4th Cir.1998) (describing standard of review for Rule 59(e)); *Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections,*434 U.S. 257, 263 n. 7, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (describing standard for Rule 60(b)). Neither did the court abuse its discretion in declining to allow Lowery to file an amended complaint after the court dismissed his original complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted. *See Pittston Co. v. United States,*199 F.3d 694, 705 (4th Cir.1999).

Finding no merit to either of Lowery’s contentions on appeal, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      1,788,558
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 861,379
<ALLOWANCES>                                  508,805
<INVENTORY>                                 1,155,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            3,333,192
<PP&E>                                      3,469,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                780,676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              6,151,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       1,634,718
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                    10,000
<COMMON>                                      285,182
<OTHER-SE>                                  3,433,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                6,151,116
<SALES>                                     1,175,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,175,098
<CGS>                                       2,143,525
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               2,143,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            2,322,293
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            158,558
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,453,734)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,453,734)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,453,734)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Graphics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joe R. Davis, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated:
January 28, 2004

| |  | /s/JOE R. DAVISJoe R. Davis
Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
#### Margay Oil Corporation *v.*Applegate.

Opinion delivered June 22, 1925.

Appeal and error — former appeal — law of case. — ;W'h©re a cause is submitted on the abstract and brief filed on the former appeal, it •being conceded that only questions decided on the former appeal •are involved, the judgment of the lower court entered in pursuance of the order of this court will be affirmed; the decision on the former appeal being the law of the case.

Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court; *John E. Martineau,*Chancellor;

affirmed.

*Bose, Hemingway, Cantrell ■& Loughborough,*for appellant.

*H. W. Applegate,*Attorney General, and *Sam M. W ass ell,*of counsel, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

On the former appeal in this case the decision, rendered February 2, 1925, reversed the decree of the chancery court and remanded the cause for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion, and on the remand there was a judgment in favor of appellee, against appellant, for recovery of the sum of money found to be due under the law as declared by this court. An appeal has been prosecuted to this court, but the case is now submitted upon the abstract and brief filed on the former appeal, it being conceded by the attorneys on both sides that the questions decided on the former appeal, and none other, are involved on the present appeal. That being true, an affirmance of the judgment below necessarily results from a consideration of the case on the present appeal. Our decision on the former appeal 'became the law of the case, and is a final ladjudication of the rights of the parties.

Decree affirmed.
Exhibit
32.1





HERITAGE
OAKS BANCORP




Quarterly
Report on Form 10Q


for the
Quarter ended March 31, 2005





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








The
undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the
“Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that to my
knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2005, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies
with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated: April
20, 2005
 ****/s/ Lawrence P.
  WardLawrence P. Ward,President and Chief Executive Officer
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Heritage Oaks Bancorp, and will be retained
by Heritage Oaks Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 28, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30689 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GARION MCCOY,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CR-207-6-N

-------------------- Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Garion McCoy appeals the district court’s denial of his motion

for new trial, filed approximately 19 months after entry of the
judgment of conviction and sentence. He based the motion on the

affidavit of Jammy Adams, which discredited the testimony of David

Mitchell Leboe uf, the Government’s witness against him at trial.

LeBoeuf’s statements contained in Adams’ affidavit constitute
impeachment evidence, thus making the statements an unsound basisNo. 02-30689 -2-

for a motion for new trial. S ee United States v. Freeman , 77 F.3d

812, 817 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. Pena , 949 F.2d 751, 758

(5th Cir. 1991). Affidavits do not constitute “newly discovered

evidence” under F ED

. R. C RIM

. P. 33. U nited States v. Lopez , 979

F.2d 10 24, 1036 (5th Cir. 1992). Moreover, as noted by the

d istrict court, LeBoeuf’s letters to the Government se eking
transfer to another prison to be separated from McCoy support the

inference that he did not lie at trial about McCoy’s involvement in

t he offenses at issue. The district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying McCoy’s motion for a new trial. S ee Freeman ,
77 F.3d at 817.

AFFIRMED

.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7174 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain veterans 

organizations to take into account the membership of spouses, widows, 

and widowers of members of the Armed Forces for purposes of determining tax exempt status. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 27, 2018 

Ms. ESHOO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain veterans organizations to take into account the 

membership of spouses, widows, and widowers of members of the Armed Forces for purposes of determining 

tax exempt status. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7174 IH

1 SECTION 1. SPOUSES, WIDOWS, AND WIDOWERS TAKEN 

2 INTO ACCOUNT IN DETERMINING TAX EX3 EMPT STATUS OF CERTAIN VETERANS ORGA4 NIZATIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 501(c)(19) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following flush matter: 

8 ‘‘Any post or organization for which there is no aux9 iliary unit or society may elect to take into account 

10 any member who is a spouse, widow, and widower of 

11 a past or present member of the Armed Forces of 

12 the United States for purposes of determining 

13 whether the post or organization meets the 75 per14 cent requirement of subparagraph (B).’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

17 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (UNAUDITED) AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,324
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,287
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,826
<INVENTORY>                                      6,920
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           5,820<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,323
<BONDS>                                         80,919<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,525
<SALES>                                         12,366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,015
<CGS>                                           11,365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,186
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    274
<INCOME-TAX>                                        99
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                175
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       175
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
<FN>
<F1>The Company does not prepare a CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
<F2>Includes prepaid expenses of $777 income tax assets, $1,280 and PP&E of $873.
<F3>Includes nonrecourse debt of $26,559.
</FN>


</TABLE>
HMN FINANCIAL, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 4, 2009
    /s/ Bradley KrehbielBradley KrehbielPresident Home Federal Savings Bank
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Jon EberleJon EberleSenior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
585 A.2d 409

#### ZENOBIO AGUIRRE v. DOMINICK A. SCIALABBA, M.D.

October 30, 1990.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 347

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN WESLEY BROWN.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





HERITAGE
      OAKS BANCORP




Quarterly
      report on Form 10Q


for
      the
      quarter ended September 30, 2008





CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The
      undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the
      “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that, to my
      knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended September
      30, 2008, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      (the “Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully
      complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
      Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





Dated:
                November 3, 2008
            /s/
                Margaret A. TorresMargaret
                A. TorresExecutive
                Vice PresidentChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Heritage Oaks Bancorp, and will be retained
      by Heritage Oaks Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
584 A.2d 245

#### IN THE MATTER OF SANDRA FRASER.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 346

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GARY MOTON.

July 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
| (logo) WELLS   

           FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

 

MAC R1204-010

9062 Old Annapolis Rd

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel: 410 884-2000

Fax: 410 715 2380

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.

c/o Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

375 Park Avenue 2nd floor

MAC J0127-023

New York, NY 10152-023

 

RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

 

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent for the Pacific Design Center Companion Loan (in such capacities, “Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the “reporting period”):

 

 

(a)  A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

 

(b)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.

 

March 19, 2015

 

 

/s/  Brian Smith

Brian Smith

Vice President

 

 

 

To:  Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.

Schedule A

 

 

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2014, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, KEYBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC, as Operating Advisor and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent, Trustee, and Custodian, relating to the series COMM 2014-CCRE18 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates relating to the Pacific Design Center Companion Loan a pari passu portion of which is included in the Series WFRBS 2014-LC16 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction.

 

 

 

To:  Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.

Schedule B

 

 

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

 

Not Applicable
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62548-62549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Developmental Biology Training 
Grants.
    Date: October 26, 2010.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Neelakanta Ravindranath, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 
Executive Blvd., Room 5B01G, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6889, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#50223126393e34223e103d31393c7e3e39387e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2b594a5d42454f59456b464a424705454243054c445d">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 62549]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 5, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-25633 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
585 A.2d 376

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RUDOLFO CONTRERAS.

September 18, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
584 A.2d 222

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ELIAS TORRES.

May 21, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 911 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to issue 

an order with respect to secondary cockpit barriers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2017 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself, Mr. GOTTHEIMER, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, 

Mr. KING of New York, Mr. JONES, Mr. LANCE, Mr. MACARTHUR, Mr. 

BLUM, Mr. THOMAS J. ROONEY of Florida, Mr. NADLER, Ms. 

BORDALLO, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. KEATING, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. PERLMUTTER, Ms. TSONGAS, and Mr. MARINO) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to issue an order with respect to secondary cockpit barriers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saracini Aviation Safe5 ty Act of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 911 IH

1 SEC. 2. SECONDARY COCKPIT BARRIERS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

3 date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the 

4 Federal Aviation Administration shall issue an order that 

5 requires— 

6 (1) on each covered aircraft the installation of 

7 a barrier, other than the cockpit door, that prevents 

8 access to the flight deck of the aircraft; and 

9 (2) for a covered aircraft— 

10 (A) that is equipped with a cockpit door, 

11 that the barrier required under paragraph (1) 

12 remain locked while— 

13 (i) the aircraft is in flight; and 

14 (ii) the cockpit door separating the 

15 flight deck and the passenger area is open; 

16 and 

17 (B) that is not equipped with a cockpit 

18 door, that the barrier required under paragraph 

19 (1) remain locked as determined appropriate by 

20 the pilot in command. 

21 (b) COVERED AIRCRAFT DEFINED.—In this section, 

22 the term ‘‘covered aircraft’’ means a commercial air23 craft— 

24 (1) operating under part 121 of title 14, Code 

25 of Federal Regulations; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 911 IH

1 (2) equipped with more than 75 passenger 

2 seats; and 

3 (3) with a maximum gross takeoff weight that 

4 exceeds 75,000 pounds. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS