alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

FEMA gives notice that the countywide per capita impact indicator under the Public Assistance program for disasters declared on or after October 1, 2010, will be increased.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         October 1, 2010, and applies to major disasters declared on or after October 1, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Tod Wells, Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3834.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Response and Recovery Directorate Policy No. 9122.1 provides that FEMA will adjust the countywide per capita impact indicator under the Public Assistance program to reflect annual changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Department of Labor.

FEMA gives notice of an increase in the countywide per capita impact indicator to $3.27 for all disasters declared on or after October 1, 2010.

FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers of 1.1 percent for the 12-month period ended in August 2010. The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor released the information on September 17, 2010.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Public Assistance Grants.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-25332 Filed 10-6-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

Trico Marine Services, Inc.

Form 10-Q

Quarterly Report

Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2007







Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Trevor Turbidy, Chief Executive Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1.

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|            |     |                        
|----------- | --- | -----------------------
|May 8, 2007 | By: | /s/ Trevor Turbidy     
|            |     | Trevor Turbidy         
|            |     | Chief Executive Officer









Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Geoff Jones, Chief Financial Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1.

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|            |     |                        
|----------- | --- | -----------------------
|May 8, 2007 | By: | /s/ Geoff Jones        
|            |     | Geoff Jones            
|            |     | Chief Financial Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 13, 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00173

- CV

City of Smithville, Appellant

v.

Thomas Watts, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 335TH DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, RO S E, AND GOODWIN

REVERSED AND RENDERED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction

ov er Thomas Watt’s claims against the City of Smithville : IT IS THEREFORE considered,

adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s order is reversed, and judgment is rendered that

Watts’s claims be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction . It is FU RTHER ordered that

the appellee pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that

this decision be certified below for observance.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-30289 

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALDORE R. LANDRY,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 03-CR-97-ALL-M3 

--------------------

Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Aldore R. Landry was convicted following a guilty plea of

possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21

U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and of possession of a firearm by a convicted

felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) and sentenced to 71-

month concurrent terms of imprisonment. As the Government

argues, Landry executed a knowing and voluntary waiver of his

right to appeal his sentence, with limited exceptions, and thus

is barred from challenging his sentence on appeal. See United
No. 04-30289 

-2-

States v. Robinson, 187 F.3d 516, 517 (5th Cir. 1999). 

Accordingly, we do not address Landry’s waived sentencing

guidelines argument. See United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290,

292-93 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Landry appeals the district court’s denial for lack of

jurisdiction of his motion to reconsider sentence. The district

court may modify the imposed term of imprisonment under limited

circumstances. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). Landry argues that his

motion to reconsider sentence was not filed under the authority

of FED. R. CRIM. P. 35 but, rather, was a “common law” motion to

reconsider over which the district court had jurisdiction. The

district court did not err in denying Landry’s motion to

reconsider sentence. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140,

141-42 (5th Cir. 1994).

Accordingly, the district court’s order denying Landry’s

motion to reconsider sentence is AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 5, 2018

No. 04-17-00637-CV

MELLENBRUCH FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LP,

Appellant

v.

Annette Louise Klattenhoff KENNEMER, Naomi Klattenhoff Peters, William Young, Carolyn 

Young, Carla Schreiber & Carl W. Matteck,

Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-03-00029-CVL

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On August 29, 2018, this court issued a memorandum opinion affirming the trial court’s 

judgment on the deed construction, adverse possession, and trespass-to-try-title questions, but 

reversing the award of attorney’s fees.

On October 1, 2018, the parties filed an “Agreement and Stipulation” that 

unconditionally waived and abandoned all parties’ rights to any further appellate review by this 

court or the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1, 49.7, 53.1. 

The parties note that their agreement “will allow this Court to promptly issue its Mandate 

to the trial court below.” 

We construe the “Agreement and Stipulation” to include an agreed motion for this court 

to issue its mandate immediately. See id. R. 18.1(c). 

The parties’ agreed motion is GRANTED; we direct the clerk of this court to issue the 

mandate immediately. See id. R. 18.1.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of October, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 22, 2010 

d1115 

Order 

 

November 22, 2010 

140731(59) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140731 

 COA: 287085 

 Shiawassee CC: 08-006622-FH 

STEVEN LOY LOCKWOOD, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 26, 2010 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-60732

Summary Calendar

SEALED APPELLEE,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SEALED APPELLANT, referred as ‘Jane Doe’, 

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, HO, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

After Jane Doe’s 270-month sentence for conspiracy to possess 

methamphetamine with intent to distribute was reduced to 188 months 

pursuant to the Government’s Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) 

motion based on her substantial assistance, Doe moved the district court to 

compel the Government to move for an additional Rule 35(b) reduction, arguing 

that her reduced sentence does not adequately reflect the extent of her 

assistance. The district court denied relief, and Doe appeals, contending that 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 4, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
No. 19-60732

2

(1) the denial of her motion to compel was error and (2) the district court should 

have provided her with counsel to assist the Government in preparing the 

original Rule 35(b) motion. She also seeks an order sealing the record on

appeal. The Government moves to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction 

or, alternatively, for summary affirmance, arguing that Doe’s challenge to the 

denial of Rule 35(b) relief is foreclosed.

We conclude that neither dismissal nor summary affirmance is 

appropriate in this case. See Gibson v. Kilpatrick, 773 F.3d 661, 673 (5th Cir. 

2014); Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). 

We therefore deny the Government’s motions to dismiss the appeal and for 

summary affirmance.

Nonetheless, we affirm the judgment without the need for additional 

briefing. Doe’s mere argument that she provided substantial assistance does 

not entitle her to a Rule 35(b) sentence reduction. See Wade v. United States, 

504 U.S. 181, 185-86 (1992); United States v. Grant, 493 F.3d 464, 467 (5th Cir. 

2007). Doe does not allege any unconstitutional motive on the Government’s 

part, nor did the Government bargain away its Rule 35(b) discretion.

Accordingly, Doe’s argument that the district court erred by denying her 

motion to compel is without merit. See United States v. Jackson, 22 F.3d 583, 

585 (5th Cir. 1994).

It is not clear that Doe’s second argument—that she should have been 

given counsel to assist in preparing the original Rule 35(b) motion—is properly 

before us in light of her failure to appeal that issue following the initial grant 

of Rule 35(b) relief. In either event, we have long held that there is no right to 

counsel in relation to a Rule 35(b) motion. See United States v. Palomo, 80 

F.3d 138, 142 (5th Cir. 1996).
No. 19-60732

3

The Government’s motions to dismiss the appeal and for summary 

affirmance are DENIED. The judgment is AFFIRMED. Doe’s motion to seal 

the record on appeal is GRANTED.
585 A.2d 369

#### JOSE PEREZ v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael ANDERSON.

No. 2010-KK-1552.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 30, 2010.

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. B, No. 472-217; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 10-K-0892.

Stay denied; writ denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Wilbert JONES v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1650.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 5, 2010.

In re Jones, Wilbert; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 64,427.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a notice of intent to seek supervisory writ of certiora-ri and/or review to the Louisiana Supreme Court filed on or about November 18, 2009. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 as ADOPTED PURUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 the undersigned officer of Aquis Communications
Group, Inc., (the "Company"), does hereby certify to such officer's knowledge
that:

      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003
      (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:    May 14, 2003
                                             /s/ D. Brian Plunkett
                                             --------------------------
                                             Name:  D. Brian Plunkett
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                             Aquis Communications Group, Inc.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
providedto Aquis Communications Group, Inc. and will be retained by Aquis
Communications Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      -30-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000921450
<NAME> QUANTUM GROUP INC /NV/
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               640,666
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        731,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          29,760
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,823,075
<PP&E>                                               254,048
<DEPRECIATION>                                       116,336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       2,670,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                645,514
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7,121
<OTHER-SE>                                           2,018,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         2,670,915
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     9,088
<CGS>                                                38,175
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        267,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (296,680)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (296,680)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (296,680)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                        0001035507
<NAME>                        800-JR CIGAR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         16,572
<SECURITIES>                                   14,981
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                   78
<INVENTORY>                                    34,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               72,399
<PP&E>                                         18,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 91,262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          17,186
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       128
<OTHER-SE>                                     61,048
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   91,262
<SALES>                                        240,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,348
<CGS>                                          190,886
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  216,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                24,116
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,781
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            23,842
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   19,335
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.29



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25082]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-2779-000]


Westerly Hospital Energy Company, LLC; Supplemental Notice That 
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 
204 Authorization

September 22, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Westerly Hospital Energy Company, LLC's application for market-based 
rate authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 12, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#de989b8c9d91b0b2b7b0bb8dabaeaeb1acaa9eb8bbacbdf0b9b1a8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="efa9aabdaca0818386818abc9a9f9f809d9baf898a9d8cc1888099">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25082 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>