Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 12, 2010 / Notices 62625 

order on stainless steel sheet and strip 

in coils from Mexico (identified as cases 

6 through 11 in the Annex to Mexico’s 

request), and any subsequent 

amendments to the same, in which 

margins of dumping for cash deposit 

purposes and assessment amounts are 

calculated using simple zeroing; 

(ii) The 2005 and 2010 five-year 

‘‘sunset’’ reviews of the antidumping 

order on stainless steel sheet and strip 

in coils from Mexico (identified as cases 

12 and 13 in the Annex to Mexico’s 

request), and any subsequent 

amendments to the same, in which the 

USDOC relied upon margins of 

dumping calculated using simple 

zeroing; 

(iii) All other subsequent closely 

connected measures taken by the United 

States in relation to the antidumping 

order on stainless steel sheet and strip 

in coils from Mexico in which USDOC 

calculated, or relied upon, margins of 

dumping calculated using simple 

zeroing or model zeroing, including the 

negative ‘‘absence of dumping’’ 

revocation determinations pursuant 

made in the 7th and 9th administrative 

reviews (identified as cases 7 and 9 in 

the Annex to Mexico’s request), and any 

subsequent amendments to the same; 

and 

(iv) Any other determinations and 

measures that derive mechanically from 

the measures described in paragraphs (i) 

to (iii) that bear a close nexus to the 

referenced five originally challenged 

administrative reviews including any 

instructions and notices issued pursuant 

thereto, and any subsequent 

amendments to the same. 

Finally, Mexico alleges that U.S. 

measures taken to comply, if and to the 

extent they exist, are inconsistent with 

Articles 2.1, 2.4, 9.3, 11.2, and 11.3 of 

the Antidumping Agreement and 

Articles II:1(a), II:1(b), VI:1, and VI:2 of 

the GATT 1994. 

Public Comment: Requirements for 

Submissions 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written comments concerning 

the issues raised in this dispute. Persons 

may submit public comments 

electronically to http:// 

www.regulations.gov docket number 

USTR–2010–0025. If you are unable to 

submit comments using http:// 

www.regulations.gov, please contact 

Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–9483 to 

arrange for an alternative method of 

transmission. 

To submit comments via http:// 

www.regulations.gov, enter docket 

number USTR–2010–0025 on the home 

page and click ‘‘search.’’ The site will 

provide a search-results page listing all 

documents associated with this docket. 

Find a reference to this notice by 

selecting ‘‘Notice’’ under ‘‘Document 

Type’’ on the left side of the search 

results page, and click on the link 

entitled ‘‘Submit a Comment.’’ (For 

further information on using the 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site, 

please consult the resources provided 

on the Web site by clicking on the 

‘‘Help’’ link at the top of the home page.) 

The http://www.regulations.gov Web 

site provides the option of providing 

comments by filling in a ‘‘Type 

Comment and Upload File’’ field, or by 

attaching a document. It is expected that 

most comments will be provided in an 

attached document. If a document is 

attached, it is necessary and sufficient to 

type ‘‘See attached’’ in the ‘‘Type 

Comment and Upload File’’ field. 

A person requesting that information 

contained in a comment submitted by 

that person be treated as business 

confidential information must certify 

that such information is business 

confidential and would not customarily 

be released to the public by the 

submitter. Business confidential 

information must be clearly designated 

as such and the submission must be 

marked ‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’ at 

the top and bottom of the cover page 

and each succeeding page. Any 

comment containing business 

confidential information must be 

submitted by fax to Sandy McKinzy at 

(202) 395–3640. A non-confidential 

summary of the confidential 

information must be submitted to 

http://www.regulations.gov. The nonconfidential summary will be placed in 

the docket and open to public 

inspection. 

Information or advice contained in a 

comment submitted, other than business 

confidential information, may be 

determined by USTR to be confidential 

in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of 

the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that 

information or advice may qualify as 

such, the submitter— 

(1) Must clearly so designate the 

information or advice; 

(2) Must clearly mark the material as 

‘‘SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE’’ at the 

top and bottom of the cover page and 

each succeeding page; and 

(3) Must provide a non-confidential 

summary of the information or advice. 

Any comment containing confidential 

information must be submitted by fax to 

Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–3640. A 

non-confidential summary of the 

confidential information must be 

submitted to www.regulations.gov. The 

non-confidential summary will be 

placed in the docket and open to public 

inspection. 

USTR will maintain a docket on this 

dispute settlement proceeding 

accessible to the public. The public file 

will include non-confidential comments 

received by USTR from the public with 

respect to the dispute. If a dispute 

settlement panel is convened or in the 

event of an appeal from such a panel, 

the U.S. submissions, any nonconfidential submissions, or nonconfidential summaries of submissions, 

received from other participants in the 

dispute, will be made available to the 

public on USTR’s Web site at http:// 

www.ustr.gov, and the report of the 

panel, and, if applicable, the report of 

the Appellate Body, will be available on 

the Web site of the World Trade 

Organization, http://www.wto.org. 

Comments will be placed in the 

docket and open to public inspection 

pursuant to 15 CFR 2006.13, except 

confidential business information 

exempt from public inspection in 

accordance with 15 CFR 2006.15 or 

information determined by USTR to be 

confidential in accordance with 19 

U.S.C. 2155(g)(2). Comments open to 

public inspection may be viewed on the 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Steven F. Fabry, 

Assistant United States Trade Representative 

for Monitoring and Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2010–25638 Filed 10–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3190–W1–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

[Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0126] 

Reports, Forms and Record Keeping 

Requirements 

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed extension, 

without change, of a currently approved 

collection of information. 

SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can 

collect certain information from the 

public, the agency must receive 

approval from the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB). Under procedures 

established by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), 

before seeking OMB approval, Federal 

agencies must solicit public comment 

on proposed collections of information, 

including extensions and reinstatements 

of previously approved collections. In 

compliance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, this notice 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
62626 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 12, 2010 / Notices 

describes one collection of information 

for which NHTSA intends to seek OMB 

approval, relating to confidential 

business information. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before December 13, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

to the docket number identified in the 

heading of this document by any of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Mail: Docket Management Facility, 

M–30, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building, Ground 

Floor, Rm. W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery or Courier: West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between 

9 am and 5 pm Eastern Time, Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

Regardless of how you submit your 

comments, please be sure to mention 

the docket number of this document and 

cite OMB Clearance No. 2127–0025, ‘‘49 

CFR Part 512, Confidential Business 

Information.’’ 

You may call the Docket at (202) 366– 

9322. 

Note that all comments received will 

be posted without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided. Please 

see the Privacy Act discussion below. 

Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search 

the electronic form of all comments 

received into any of our dockets by the 

name of the individual submitting the 

comment (or signing the comment, if 

submitted on behalf of an association, 

business, labor union, etc.). You may 

review DOT’s complete Privacy Act 

Statement in the Federal Register 

published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 

19477–78). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

questions contact Nicholas Englund in 

the Office of the Chief Counsel at the 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration, telephone (202) 366– 

5263. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

before an agency submits a proposed 

collection of information to OMB for 

approval, it must publish a document in 

the Federal Register providing a 60-day 

comment period and otherwise consult 

with members of the public and affected 

agencies concerning each proposed 

collection of information. The OMB has 

promulgated regulations describing 

what must be included in such a 

document. Under OMB’s regulations (at 

5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask 

for public comment on the following: 

(i) Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(ii) the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the proposed 

collection of information, including the 

validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used; 

(iii) how to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and 

(iv) how to minimize the burden of 

the collection of information on those 

who are to respond, including the use 

of appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology, e.g., permitting 

electronic submission of responses. 

In compliance with these 

requirements, NHTSA asks for public 

comment on the following extension of 

clearance for a currently approved 

collection of information: 

Confidential Business Information 

Type of Request—Extension of 

clearance. 

OMB Clearance Number—2127–0025. 

Form Number—This collection of 

information uses no standard forms. 

Requested Expiration Date of 

Approval—Three (3) years from the date 

of approval of the collection. 

Summary of the Collection of 

Information—Persons who submit 

information to the agency and seek to 

have the agency withhold some or all of 

that information from disclosure under 

the Freedom of Information Act 

(‘‘FOIA’’), 5 U.S.C. 552, must provide the 

agency with sufficient support that 

justifies the confidential treatment of 

that information. In addition, a request 

for confidential treatment must be 

accompanied by: (1) A complete copy of 

the submission; (2) a copy of the 

submission containing only those 

portions for which confidentiality is not 

sought with the confidential portions 

redacted; and (3) either a second 

complete copy of the submission or 

alternatively those portions of the 

submission that contain the information 

for which confidentiality is sought. 

Furthermore, the requestor must submit 

a completed certification as provided in 

49 CFR Part 512, Appendix A. See 

generally 49 CFR Part 512 (NHTSA 

Confidential Business Information 

regulations). 

Part 512 ensures that information 

submitted under a claim of 

confidentiality is properly evaluated in 

an efficient manner under prevailing 

legal standards and, where appropriate, 

accorded confidential treatment. To 

facilitate the evaluation process, in their 

requests for confidential treatment, 

submitters of information may make 

reference to certain limited classes of 

information that are presumptively 

treated as confidential, such as 

blueprints and engineering drawings, 

future specific model plans (under 

limited conditions), and future vehicle 

production or sales figures for specific 

models (under limited conditions). 

Further, most early warning reporting 

(EWR) data are confidential under class 

determinations provided in 49 CFR Part 

512, with the exception of information 

on death, injury, and property damage 

claims and notices, which would be 

handled on an individual basis 

according to the procedures of Part 512 

and are, therefore, covered by this 

notice. 72 FR 59434 (Oct. 19, 2007). 

Description of the Need for the 

Information and Use of the 

Information—NHTSA receives 

confidential information for use in its 

activities, which include investigations, 

rulemaking actions, program planning 

and management, and program 

evaluation. The information is needed 

to ensure the agency has sufficient 

relevant information for decisionmaking in connection with these 

activities. Some of this information is 

submitted voluntarily, as in rulemaking, 

and some is submitted in response to 

compulsory information requests, as in 

investigations. 

Description of the Likely Respondents, 

Including Estimated Number and 

Proposed Frequency of Response to the 

Collection of Information—This 

collection of information applies to 

entities that submit to the agency 

information that the entities wish to 

have withheld from disclosure under 

the FOIA. Thus, the collection of 

information applies to entities that are 

subject to laws administered by the 

agency or agency regulations and are 

under an obligation to provide 

information to the agency. It also 

includes entities that voluntarily submit 

information to the agency. Such entities 

would include manufacturers of motor 

vehicles and of motor vehicle 

equipment. Importers are considered to 

be manufacturers. It may also include 

other entities that are involved with 

motor vehicles or motor vehicle 

equipment but are not manufacturers. 

Estimate of the Total Annual 

Reporting and Recordkeeping Burdens 

Resulting from the Collection of 

Information—3,600 hours. 

The agency receives requests for 

confidential treatment that vary in size 

from requests that ask the agency to 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 12, 2010 / Notices 62627 

withhold as little as a portion of one 

page to multiple boxes of documents. 

NHTSA estimates that it will take on 

average approximately eight (8) hours 

for an entity to prepare a submission 

requesting confidential treatment. This 

estimate will vary based on the size of 

the submission, with smaller and 

voluntary submissions taking 

considerably less time to prepare. The 

agency based this estimate on the 

volume of requests received over the 

past three years. 

NHTSA estimates that it will receive 

approximately 450 requests for 

confidential treatment annually. This 

figure is based on the average number of 

requests received over the past three 

years. We selected this period because 

it provides an estimate based on 

incoming requests for the most recent 

three years. The agency estimates that 

the total burden for this information 

collection will be approximately 3,600 

hours, which is based on the number of 

requests (450) multiplied by the 

estimated number of hours to prepare 

each submission (8 hours). 

Since nothing in the rule requires 

those persons who request confidential 

treatment pursuant to Part 512 to keep 

copies of any records or requests 

submitted to us, recordkeeping costs 

imposed would be zero hours and zero 

costs. 

Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506; delegation of 

authority at 49 CFR 1.50. 

Issued on: October 4, 2010. 

O. Kevin Vincent, 

Chief Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2010–25485 Filed 10–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Notice of Cancellation of Preparation 

of Environmental Impact Statement for 

the Tucson International Airport, 

Tucson, Pima County, AZ 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration, DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of 

preparation of environmental impact 

statement. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) announces that it 

has decided to discontinue preparation 

of an Environmental Impact Statement 

(EIS) for the proposed relocation of 

Runway 11R/29L and associated 

development at Tucson International 

Airport. The FAA’s decision to 

discontinue preparation of the EIS is 

based upon the results from a planning 

effort completed by the Tucson Airport 

Authority (TAA), the owner and 

operator of the airport. This planning 

effort reveled the project purpose and 

need has changed significantly. As a 

result, FAA has determined the new 

runway proposal at Tucson 

International Airport is not ripe for 

decision at this time. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Roxana Hernandez, Environmental 

Protection Specialist, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Western-Pacific Region, 

Los Angeles Airports District Office, 

P.O. Box 92007, Los Angeles, CA 

90009–2007, Telephone: (310) 725– 

3614. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 13, 2005, the FAA, published in 

the Federal Register a Notice of Intent 

to prepare an Environmental Impact 

Statement (EIS) and hold a Public 

Scoping Meeting at Tucson 

International Airport (Volume 70, 

Number 197, FR 59800–59801). The EIS 

and Public Scoping Meeting were to 

address the proposed relocation of 

Runway 11R/29L and associated 

development at airport. 

In 2005, the FAA based its decision to 

prepare the EIS on the procedures 

described in FAA Order 5050.4A, 

Airport Environmental Handbook, and 

FAA Order 1050.1E, Environmental 

Impacts: Policies and Procedures. FAA 

also based its decision to prepare a 

federal EIS primarily on TAA’s proposal 

to relocate Runway 11R/29L, 450 feet to 

the southwest, creating a centerline to 

centerline separation of 1,156 feet 

between the existing Runway 11L29R. 

The length of the relocated Runway 

11R/29L would have been 11,000 feet 

long by 150 feet wide. 

Recently, the TAA completed a 

planning effort that reveled that the 

project’s purpose and need changed 

significantly. Therefore, when the TAA 

submits a new Airport Layout Plan with 

a revised project depicted on it, the FAA 

will determine the appropriate National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 

documentation necessary to assess the 

environmental effects of those 

improvements pursuant to FAA Order 

5050.4B, National Environmental Policy 

Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions 

for Airport Actions, and FAA Order 

1050.1E, Environmental Impacts: 

Policies and Procedures. 

Issued in Hawthorne, California on 

September 30, 2010. 

Debbie Roth, 

Acting Manager, Airports Division, Western— 

Pacific Region, AWP–600. 

[FR Doc. 2010–25483 Filed 10–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Highway Administration 

Environmental Impact Statement; 

Davis County, UT 

AGENCY: Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of Intent. 

SUMMARY: FWHA is issuing this notice 

to advise the public that an 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 

will be prepared for proposed 

transportation improvements in Davis 

County, Utah. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Edward Woolford, Environmental 

Program Manager, Federal Highway 

Administration, 2520 West 4700 South, 

Suite 9A, Salt Lake City, Utah 84118, 

Telephone: (801) 955–3500, e-mail 

Edward.Woolford@dot.gov; or Charles 

Mace, Project Manager, Utah 

Department of Transportation, Region 

One Office, 166 West Southwell Street, 

Ogden, UT 84404–4194, Telephone: 

(801) 620–1685, e-mail 

cmace@utah.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FWHA, in 

cooperation with the Utah Department 

of Transportation (UDOT), will prepare 

an EIS on a proposal to address current 

and projected traffic demand on 1800 

North (SR–37) in the cities of Clinton 

and Sunset in Davis County, Utah. The 

proposed project area extends from 2000 

West to I–15 along 1800 North, a 

distance of approximately 2 miles. 

Transportation improvements in this 

area are needed to address current and 

projected 2040 traffic demand along the 

existing two-lane 1800 North corridor, 

provide better east-west access, and 

improve safety. 

The FHWA will consider a reasonable 

range of alternatives that meet the 

project purpose and need and are based 

on agency and public input. These 

alternatives include: (1) Taking no 

action; (2) using alternate travel modes; 

(3) upgrading and adding lanes to the 

existing roadway network, including 

1800 North; (4) a grade separation at the 

Union Pacific Railroad crossing on 1800 

North; (5) a new interchange on I–15 at 

1800 North; (6) improving adjacent 

interchanges on I–15; (7) combinations 

of any of the above; and (8) other 

feasible alternatives identified during 

the scoping process. 

A Coordination Plan is being prepared 

to define the agency and public 

participation procedure for the 

environmental review process. The plan 

will outline how agencies and the 

public will provide input during the 

scoping process, the development of the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES