alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61744-61745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25090]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-2836-000]


WFM Intermediary New England, LLC; Supplemental Notice That 
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 
204 Authorization

September 27, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
WFM Intermediary New England, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 18, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a

[[Page 61745]]

document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#165053445559787a7f787345636666796462567073647538717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="266063746569484a4f484375535656495452664043544508414950">[email protected]</span></a> or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25090 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
866 A.2d 980

#### IN THE MATTER OF C. BRIAN DALY, A/K/A CHARLES B. DALY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 272231971).

February 23, 2005.

ORDER

C. BRIAN DALY, a/k/a CHARLES B. DALY, of UNION, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, having entered a plea of guilty in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to a federal information charging him with conspiracy to defraud a financial institution, in violation of 18 *U.S.CA*371, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*l:20-13(b)(l), C. BRIAN DALY, a/k/a CHARLES B. DALY, is temporarily suspended *423from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that C. BRIAN DALY, a/k/a CHARLES B. DALY, be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that C. BRIAN DALY, a/k/a CHARLES B. DALY, comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.
584 A.2d 207

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAY P. DURR.

May 1, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 356

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MAE HELEN BROWN.

July 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northfield Laboratories Inc. on Form
10-Q for the period ended February 29, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jack J. Kogut, Chief
Financial Officer of Northfield Laboratories Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:


         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of Northfield Laboratories Inc.


Date: April 13, 2004


/s/ Jack J. Kogut
-----------------------
Jack J. Kogut
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert B. Goergen,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Blyth, Inc., certify that:

 

1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Blyth, Inc.;

 

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: December 12,  2005         |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
|                                  |
| /s/ Robert B.  Goergen                |   |
| Robert B.  Goergen                    |
| Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MITY Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Bradley T Nielson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date: October 28, 2004                  /s/ Bradley T Nielson
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Bradley T Nielson
                                        Chief Executive Officer
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO

  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334

  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2014, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2014-UBS3 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.              A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from June 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”),  and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.              To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merix Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 26, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Janie S. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated January 5, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Janie S. Brown     
|                      |  |  |  | Janie S. Brown         
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 50253 Su m m ar yC al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. O M A R D E M O R T IU S W ILL IAM S , al so kn ow n as O m ar W i l l i am s, D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 6: 06- C R
- 38- 1 B ef ore R E AV L E Y , D AV IS, an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Aj u rycon victedO m a r D em ortius W illia m s of po sse ssion w i th i n ten t t o d is tr ib u te a t lea s t 5 0 g r a m s o f c o c a in e b a s e (c r a c k ) w ith in 1 ,0 0 0 fe e t of a p u b lic s c ho o l(c o unto ne ) a nd p o s s e s s i o n w i t h i nt e ntt o di s t r ibut e c o c ai ne b as e (c o unt t w o ) . Th e d i s t r i c t c o u r t s e n t e n c e d W i l l i a m s t o l i fe i n p r i s o n o n c o u nto ne a nd 2 4 0 m o n th s o n c o u n t tw o a n do r d e r e dt h e s e n te n c e s to ru n co n c u r r e n tly . S ee21 U .S .C . § 8 4 1 (b )(1)(A)(i ii). United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Janua ry 6, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 50253

2 W i l l i am s ar gues t hatthe i m pos i t i on of a l i fe se nt enc e i s c r ueland unu sual pu n i shm en tun der t h e E i gh t h A m en dm en t . H e argu es t h at t h e gross di sproporti on al i t y betw een hi s l i fe sentence an d the sentences f or si m i l ar cr i m es in th is a n do th e rju r is d ic tio n s m a k e s h is life s e n te n c e u n c o n s t i t u tio n a l. W il li a m s a ss e rts th a t th e p rio r c o n v iction s th a t q u a li fied h im fo r th e life sentence w ere “rel ativel y m i n or of fen ses, ” t w o bei n g st ate j ai lf el on i es and one, a m ore seri ou s fel on y. H e a sks this cou rtto con si der t h e di spari t y betw een cr ack cocai n e an d p ow der c o c ai ne sentences and argu es t h at a depa rt u re based on such di spari t y can be reasonab l e. W illia m s ’ s a r g u m e n ts a r e fo r e c lo s e d . S ee Har m e l i n v . Mi c higa n , 5 01 U . S. 957 , 994
- 95 (1991 ); Un itedS ta tes v. Ha rr is , 5 6 6 F .3d 4 2 2 , 4 3 6 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 9 ), pet i t i on f

or cer t . f i led , (A u g . 2 0 , 2 0 0 9 ) (N o . 0 9 -7 3 8 5 ); Un i t ed S t ate s v. Parker , 505 F. 3d3 23 , 3 30
- 31 ( 5t h C i r. 2 00 7) . W i l l i am s ’ s r e l i anc e o n Ki m brough v. Un i t ed S t ate s , 5 5 2 U . S . 8 5 (20 0 7 ) i s m i sp la c e d . Ki m br ough rec ogn i zed that di st ri ct co u rts re m a in b o u n db yth e s t a tu to rym in im u m se n te n ce s in § 8 4 1 (b )(1). Ki m br ough , 552 U . S. at107. Ac c o r d i n g l y , W i l l i a ms ’ s c o n v i c t i o n a n ds e n t e n c e a r e A F F I RMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidated Graphics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joe R. Davis, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated:
August 14, 2003

| |  | /s/JOE R. DAVISJoe R. Davis
Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-30289 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALDORE R. LANDRY, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 03-CR-97-ALL-M3

-------------------- Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Aldore R. Landry was convicted following a guilty plea of possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) and sentenced to 71- month concurrent terms of imprisonment. As the Government argues, Landry executed a knowing and voluntary waiver of his right to appeal his sentence, with limited exceptions, and thus is barred from challenging his sentence on appeal. See UnitedNo. 04-30289 -2- States v. Robinson , 187 F.3d 516, 517 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we do not address Landry’s waived sentencing guidelines argument. See United States v. Portillo , 18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th Cir. 1994). Landry appeals the district court’s denial for lack of jurisdiction of his motion to reconsider sentence. The district court may modify the imposed term of imprisonment under limited circumstances. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). Landry argues that his motion to reconsider sentence was not filed under the authority of F ED . R. C RIM . P. 35 but, rather, was a “common law” motion to reconsider over which the district court had jurisdiction. The district court did not err in denying Landry’s motion to reconsider sentence. See United States v. Early , 27 F.3d 140, 141-42 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the district court’s order denying Landry’s motion to reconsider sentence is AFFIRMED.
585 A.2d 365

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RICHARD SIACA, SR.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofConsolidated Graphics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joe R. Davis,Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

# (1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

#  

# (2)                                  Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

#  

|   | Dated: | November 2, 2005 |                                                            |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                  |   /s/ Joe R. Davis                                         |   |
|   |   |                  | Joe R. Davis                                                    |
|   |   |                  | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 15.2



LOGO

Somekh Chaikin

KPMG
Millennium Tower

17 Haarbaa Street, PO Box 609

Tel Aviv 61006, Israel

+972 3 684 8000

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Kenon Holdings Ltd.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-201716) on Form S-8 of Kenon Holdings Ltd. (hereinafter -
Kenon) of our report dated March 31, 2015, with respect to the combined carve-out statements of financial position as of December 31, 2014 and the related combined carve-out statements of income, other comprehensive income, changes in
parent company investment and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2014, which report appears in the December 31, 2015 annual report on Form 20-F of Kenon.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|LOGO                                 
|/s/ Somekh Chaikin                   
|Certified Public Accountants (Israel)
|A Member firm of KPMG International  
|                                     
|Tel Aviv, Israel                     
|April 20, 2016                       

Somekh Chaikin, an Israeli partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG
International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity.