alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



Trico Marine Services, Inc.

Form
10-Q

Quarterly Report

Quarterly Period Ended
March 31, 2004



Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Trevor Turbidy, Chief
Financial Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by such Report.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                           
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Trevor Turbidy
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Trevor
Turbidy                            
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



Certifications
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Thomas E. Fairley, Chief Executive Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company for the period covered by such Report.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------
|Date: May 10, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Thomas E. Fairley
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Thomas E. Fairley
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | President and CEO
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-844

_____________________________

AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Petitioner,

v.

NORMA JO SMITH and DGT, INC.,

Respondents.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

November 13, 2018

PER CURIAM.

In this certiorari proceeding, Petitioner seeks review of the 

order allowing Respondents to amend their counterclaim against 

Petitioner to assert a claim for punitive damages. The scope of our

review is limited to determining whether the trial court complied 

with the procedural requirements in section 768.72, Florida 

Statutes; we do not have jurisdiction to review the sufficiency of 

the evidence proffered to support the punitive damages claim. See

Simeon, Inc. v. Cox, 671 So. 2d 158, 160 (Fla. 1996); Globe 

Newspaper Co. v. King, 658 So. 2d 518, 520 (Fla. 1995); Monroe 

Health Systems, Inc. v. Estate of Gonzales, 795 So. 2d 1133, 1134 

(Fla. 5th DCA 2001).
2

Here, the trial court complied with the applicable procedural 

requirements. Respondents proffered evidence to support their

punitive damage claim, and after a hearing, the trial court entered 

a thorough order finding the proffer to be sufficient to support the 

claim. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and WETHERELL and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Christopher M. Cobb and Kayla A. Haines of Jimerson & Cobb, 

P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Alexander D. Brown and Adam S. Goldman of The Concept Law 

Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Respondents.
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS S E C O N D D I S T R I C T O F T E X A S CHIEF JUSTICE BONNIE SUDDERTH
JUSTICES ELIZABETH KERR J. WADE BIRDWELL DABNEY BASSEL DANA WOMACK MIKE WALLACH BRIAN WALKER TIM CURRY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER 401 W. BELKNAP, SUITE 9000 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76196-0211 TEL: (817) 884-1900 FAX: (817) 884-1932 www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa CLERK DEBRA SPISAK
CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY LISA M. WEST
GENERAL COUNSEL CLARISSA HODGES
October 6, 2022 Criminal District Clerk, Tarrant County Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center 401 W. Belknap, 3rd Floor Fort Worth, TX 76196-0402 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Joseph W. Spence Assistant Criminal District Attorney Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center 401 W. Belknap St. Fort Worth, TX 76196-0201 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Hon. George William Gallagher Judge, 396th District Court Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center 401 W. Belknap, 6th floor Fort Worth, TX 76196 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Matthew Smid Daniel, Moore, Evans, Biggs, Decker & Smid 301 Commerce St., Ste. 2001 Fort Worth, TX 76102-4129 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
Hon. David L. Evans Regional Presiding Judge Tom Vandergriff Civil Courts Building 100 N. Calhoun, 4th Floor Fort Worth, TX 76196 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 02-21-00002-CR, 02-21-00003-CR Trial Court Case Number: 1591282D, 1627542D Style: Beecher Montgomery
v. The State of Texas Today the Second Court of Appeals issued an opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause. Copies of the opinion and judgment are attached and can also be viewed on our Court’s webpage at: http://www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa

.02-21-00002-CR

October 6, 2022 Page 2 Respectfully yours, DEBRA SPISAK, CLERK
#### EMG HOLDINGS, INC., Appellant, v. AUTUMN PARTNERSHIP, LLP, Appellee.

No. 3D10-2328.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 27, 2011.

Rehearing Denied June 13, 2011.

Harvey D. Rogers, Miami, for appellant.

Jose Garcia-Pedrosa, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN and SUAREZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See*§ 45.061(2), Fla. Stat. (2010); *In re Jet 1 Ctr. Inc.,*335 B.R. 771, 772 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.2005); *Lennar Corp.*
      *1186
      *v. Muskat,*595 So.2d 968 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, October 29, 2010, 2 p.m. to October 29, 2010, 4 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 23, 2010, 75 FR 57965-57967.                

The meeting times have been changed to 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on October 29, 2010. The meeting date and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: September 29, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-25171 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7616
ALBERNIE STUDWELL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, of the St. Brides Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at A lexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-687-AM) Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Albernie Studwell, Appellant Pro Se. John Kenneth Byrum, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Studwell v. Warden , No. CA-97-687-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 22, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 72 

AN ACT 

To ensure the Government Accountability Office has 

adequate access to information. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 72 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘GAO Access and Over3 sight Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ACCESS TO CERTAIN INFORMATION. 

5 (a) ACCESS TO CERTAIN INFORMATION.—Subchapter 

6 II of chapter 7 of title 31, United States Code, is amended 

7 by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘§ 721. Access to certain information 

9 ‘‘(a) No provision of the Social Security Act, includ10 ing section 453(l) of that Act (42 U.S.C. 653(l)), shall 

11 be construed to limit, amend, or supersede the authority 

12 of the Comptroller General to obtain any information or 

13 to inspect any record under section 716 of this title. 

14 ‘‘(b) The specific reference to a statute in subsection 

15 (a) shall not be construed to affect access by the Govern16 ment Accountability Office to information under statutes 

17 that are not so referenced.’’. 

18 (b) AGENCY REPORTS.—Section 720(b) of title 31, 

19 United States Code, is amended— 

20 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 

21 inserting ‘‘or planned’’ after ‘‘action taken’’; and 

22 (2) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the 

23 following: 

24 ‘‘(1) the Committee on Homeland Security and 

25 Governmental Affairs of the Senate, the Committee 

26 on Oversight and Government Reform of the House 
3 

•HR 72 EH

1 of Representatives, the congressional committees 

2 with jurisdiction over the agency program or activity 

3 that is the subject of the recommendation, and the 

4 Government Accountability Office before the 61st 

5 day after the date of the report; and’’. 

6 (c) AUTHORITY TO OBTAIN RECORDS.—Section 716 

7 of title 31, United States Code, is amended in subsection 

8 (a)— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘(a)’’ and inserting ‘‘(2)’’; and 

10 (2) by inserting after the section heading the 

11 following: 

12 ‘‘(a)(1) The Comptroller General is authorized to ob13 tain such agency records as the Comptroller General re14 quires to discharge the duties of the Comptroller General 

15 (including audit, evaluation, and investigative duties), in16 cluding through the bringing of civil actions under this 

17 section. In reviewing a civil action under this section, the 

18 court shall recognize the continuing force and effect of the 

19 authorization in the preceding sentence until such time as 

20 the authorization is repealed pursuant to law.’’. 

21 (d) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

22 The table of sections for chapter 7 of title 31, United 
4 

•HR 72 EH

1 States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relat2 ing to section 720 the following: 

‘‘721. Access to certain information.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 4, 

2017. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 72 

AN ACT 

To ensure the Government Accountability Office 

has adequate access to information.
NUMBER 13-15-00576-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

GREGG BARTHELMAN, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

 

On appeal from the 206th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

 

O R D E R

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is currently pending before the Court. On July 28, 2016, this Court 

ordered the trial court clerk to forward the following original trial exhibits associated with 

this appeal to this Court for its review and inspection: State’s Exhibits 29, 30, 33, 35, 36, 

37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 44, 45, and 46. This Court received those exhibits on August 16, 

2016. 
2

On August 24, 2016, the State filed a motion pursuant to Rule 34.6(g)(2) of the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requesting that this Court supplement its previous 

order and request State’s Exhibit 31, a USB drive. According to the State’s motion, the 

contents of this exhibit “contains numerous photos germane to issues raised by the 

[a]ppellant in his appeal.” Among several issues in his brief, appellant challenges the 

sufficiency of the evidence for his convictions of promoting and possessing child 

pornography. 

Accordingly, we GRANT the State’s motion and order the trial court clerk to forward 

State’s Exhibit 31 in trial court cause number CR-2182-14-D to this Court within ten days 

from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

2nd day of September, 2016.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25505]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD11-1-000]

Reliability Monitoring, Enforcement and Compliance Issues; Notice 
of Technical Conference

October 1, 2010.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) will hold a 
Commissioner-led Technical Conference in the above-referenced 
proceeding to explore issues associated with reliability monitoring, 
enforcement and compliance, as announced in the Commission's order 
issued September 16, 2010 that accepted the North American Electric 
Reliability Corporation's initial assessment in Docket No. RR09-7-000 
of its performance as the nation's Electric Reliability Organization 
(ERO), and performance by the Regional Entities, under their delegation 
agreements with the ERO.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ North American Electric Reliability Corporation; Reliability 
Standards Development and NERC and Regional Entity Enforcement, 132 
FERC ] 61,217 at P 12 (2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This Technical Conference will be held on November 18, 2010, in the 
Commission Meeting Room (2C) at Commission Headquarters, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, from 1 p.m. until 5 p.m. EST. The 
conference will be transcribed and Webcast. Transcripts of the 
conference will be immediately available for a fee from Ace-Federal 
Reporters, Inc. (202-347-3700 or 1-800-336-6646). A free webcast of the 
conference is also available through http://www.ferc.gov. Anyone with 
Internet access who desires to listen to this event can do so by 
navigating to http://www.ferc.gov's Calendar of Events and locating 
this event in the Calendar. The event will contain a link to its 
webcast. The Capitol Connection provides technical support for the 
webcasts and offers the option of listening to the meeting via phone-
bridge for a fee. If you have any questions, visit http://www.CapitolConnection.org or call 703-993-3100.
    A further notice with detailed information, including the agenda, 
will be issued in advance of the conference. All interested parties are 
invited and there is no registration list or registration fee to 
attend.
    For further information contact Gregory Campbell by e-mail at 
[email protected] or by phone at 202-502-6465.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25505 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
## NUMBER 13

- 1 8

- 00 243

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

YVETTE HERNANDEZ

, Appellant,

v.

FIRST BANK D/B/A FIR ST BANK

MORTGAGE, ITS SUCCES SORS

AND ASSIGNS

, Appellee.

On a ppeal from the County Court

of Willacy County, Texas.



## ORDER TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant's fourth motion for extension of time to

file the brief . A ppellan t’ s brief was originally due on September 27, 2018

. T his Court

has previously granted appellant three extension s of time totaling 200 days to file the brief,2

and appellant now seeks an additional 56 days, until June 10, 2019 to file the brief.

Appellee has filed an objection to the motion and requests that this Court deny appellant’s

request and dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with appellant’s briefing duties.

The Court, having fully examined and considered the extensions previously

granted in this cause and appellee’s objection , is of the opinion that appellant ’ s fourth

m otion for extension of time to file a brief should be granted with order. The Court

GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART appellant's fourth motio n for extension of time.

This motion is GRANTED insofar as the Court will extend appellant's deadline to file his

brief until May 15 , 201 9 . This motion is DENIED insofar as the Court will not allow an

extension until June 10 , 201 9

. The Court looks with disfavor on the delay caused by

counsel’s failure to timely file a brief in this matter. No further extensions will be granted

absent exigent circumstances.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed th e

2 2nd day of April

, 201 9

.
585 A.2d 363

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. VINCENT CAPUTO.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, October 27, 2010, 2:30 p.m. to October 27, 2010, 5:30 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 30, 2010, 75 FR 60465-60466.                

The meeting has been changed to an Internet Assisted Meeting (IAM). The meeting will be two days October 27, 2010, from 8 a.m. to October 28, 2010, 6 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: October 4, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-25598 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 774 

To remove the limitation on Medicaid coverage of tobacco cessation 

nonprescription drugs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2017 

Ms. MENG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To remove the limitation on Medicaid coverage of tobacco 

cessation nonprescription drugs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicaid Coverage of 

5 Tobacco Cessation Nonprescription Drugs Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MEDICAID COVERAGE OF TOBACCO CESSATION 

7 NONPRESCRIPTION DRUGS. 

8 Section 1927(d)(2)(F) of the Social Security Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 1396r–8(d)(2)(F)) is amended to read as follows: 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 774 IH

1 ‘‘(F) Nonprescription drugs, except agents 

2 approved by the Food and Drug Administration 

3 under the over-the-counter monograph process 

4 for purposes of promoting, and when used to 

5 promote, tobacco cessation.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
No. 87-6528.

#### Braan *v.*District of Columbia Public Defender Service.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Elizabeth Harris LOWERY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D09-2311.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 7, 2011.

Rehearing Denied March 21, 2011.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Terry Carley, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Elizabeth Harris Lowery, appeals her judgments and sentences and raises two issues, only one of which merits discussion. Appellant argues that the trial court committed fundamental error in failing to instruct the jury on the knowledge element of the offense of resisting an officer without violence. Although the State concedes error, we conclude that no fundamental error occurred. Appellant’s testimony established that at the time any alleged resistance occurred, she was aware that the individuals were officers. As such, the knowledge element was not in dispute at trial. *Cf. Lett v. State,*29 So.3d 455, 456 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (holding that the trial court committed fundamental error in not instructing the jury on the knowledge element of the offense of resisting an officer without violence when that element was in dispute at trial); *Leonard*
      *869
      *v. State,*1 So.3d 1271, 1271 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (same).

Accordingly, we AFFIRM.

KAHN, DAVIS, and HAWKES, JJ, concur.
585 A.2d 386

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM FARRELL.

October 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Timothy BRINKLEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-1434.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 9, 2010.

Rehearing Denied May 12, 2010.

Timothy Brinkley, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

HAWKES, C.J., WETHERELL and ROWE, JJ., concur.