alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         243,500
<SECURITIES>                                 5,500,400
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,002,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,897,200
<PP&E>                                       2,136,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,049,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          582,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,960,600
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,506,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,049,400
<SALES>                                      2,054,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,213,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,667,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                546,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   207,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   338,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
    THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
    MARCH 31, 1997  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
    REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                       5,714,000
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             7,235,000
<PP&E>                      94,572,000
<DEPRECIATION>              25,841,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>              75,966,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        7,010,000
<BONDS>                     29,150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                        40,000
<OTHER-SE>                  25,060,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>75,866,000
<SALES>                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             1,306,000
<CGS>                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             1,003,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             173,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 97,000
<INCOME-TAX>                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             97,000
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                    97,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .08
        



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7312 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7312

  To make innovative technology loan guarantee support available for 
                     battery storage technologies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 13, 2018

  Mr. Takano (for himself and Mr. Collins of New York) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
   Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and 
Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To make innovative technology loan guarantee support available for 
                     battery storage technologies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Battery Storage Innovation Act''.

SEC. 2. BATTERY STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES.

    Section 1703(b) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 
16513(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(11) Battery storage technologies for residential, 
        industrial, or transportation applications.''.
                                 <all>
```
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed May 28, 2015.

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 1 4 - 00 962 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 00963 - CR ALLEN HO , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal Distri ct Court No. 3 Dallas Co unty, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F 13 - 58092 - J, F13 - 58094 - J 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Fillmore, Myers, and Evans Opinion b y Justice Fillmore A jury convicted Allen Ho of two aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon offenses
. The trial court ren dered judgment sentencing Ho to fifteen years’ imprisonment i n each case
. See T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 29.03(a)(2) (West 2011)
. On appeal, Ho ’s attorney filed a brief in which sh e concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief mee ts the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811

– 12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Pan el Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to Ho
. We advised Ho of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a- 2
- pro se response. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate c ourts and counsel in Anders cases). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief
. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 82 6

– 2 7 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)
. We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arg uably support the appeal s . W e affirm the trial court’s judgment s .

Do Not Publish T EX . R. A PP . P. 47 140962F.U05 /Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE- 3
- 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
JUDGMENT
ALLEN HO , Appellant No. 05

- 14

- 00962

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F13

- 58092

- J). Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore, Justices Myers and Evans participating.

Ba sed on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED
. Judgment entered May 28, 2015.- 4
- 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
JUDGMENT
ALLEN HO , Appellant No. 05

- 14

- 00963

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F13

- 58094

- J). Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore, Justices Myers and Evans participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judg ment is AFFIRMED
. Judgment entered May 28, 2015.
585 A.2d 412

#### EDWARD ACCIARDI v. CONSULTINVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC.

October 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
584 A.2d 245

#### BOGUSLAW OCZKOWSKI v. PATRICIA OCZKOWSKI.

June 11, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
585 A.2d 368

#### RALPH TOTARO, JR. v. ROSEMARIE TOTARO.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 814 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify that the estate of a 

deceased veteran may receive certain accrued benefits upon the death 

of the veteran, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2017 

Mr. ZELDIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify that the 

estate of a deceased veteran may receive certain accrued 

benefits upon the death of the veteran, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF ELIGIBLE RECIPIENTS OF 

4 CERTAIN ACCRUED BENEFITS UPON DEATH 

5 OF BENEFICIARY. 

6 (a) ELIGIBILITY OF ESTATE.—Section 5121(a)(2) of 

7 title 38, United States Code, is amended— 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 814 IH

1 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

2 by inserting ‘‘, or estate,’’ after ‘‘person’’; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub4 paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(D) The estate of the veteran (unless the 

6 estate will escheat).’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to the death of an 

9 individual on or after the date of the enactment of this 

10 Act. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Rose Manale McCANN, v. Peggy BLACKWELL, Testamentary Executrix of the Succession of Walter Lester McCann.

No. 2011-CC-0244.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 1, 2011.

In re Blackwell, Peggy; Succession of Walter Lester McCann; — Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, Baton Rouge City Court, No. 169,863; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 1896.

Granted and remanded to the First Circuit Court of Appeal for briefing, argument and full opinion.

WEIMER, J., would grant and docket the writ.
#### Church *v.*State.

Opinion delivered April 12, 1926.

1. Intoxicating liquors—transporting—evidence.—On a charge of transporting liquor, evidence that accused told an employee to go to his home and bring a bottle of whiskey to be found in a safe, which the employee did, tout, being intercepted by an officer, he broke the bottle, *held*to sustain the charge.

2. Criminal law—principals and accessories.—In misdemeanors there are no accessories, so that one who procures another to commit a misdemeanor is himself a principal in the crime.

Appeal from Clay Circuit Court, Eastern District; *G. E. Keck,*Judge;

affirmed.

*W. E. Spence,*for appellant.

*H. W. Applegate,*Attorney General, and *Barden Moose,*Assistant, for appellee.

Humphreys, J.

Appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted in the circuit court of Clay County, Eastern District, under § 6165 of Crawford & Moses’ Digest, making it unlawful for any one to transport alcoholic liquors from one place to another in this State, and was fined $100 as a punishment therefor, from which is this appeal.

*975The 'undisputed facts are that Elzra Blake, an employee of appellant, was instructed to go to his home and get a hottle of whiskey for him. Appellant told witness he would find the whiskey in the safe. Witness did as he was told, but, before getting to appellant with the whiskey, was intercepted by an officer, whereupon he broke the bottle. Witness had not tasted the liquid before destroying it, and said he could not swear whether it was whiskey or not.

Appellant’s first assignment of error is an alleged insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. It is argued that there is no proof that the fluid in the bottle was alcoholic liquor. Appellant told the prosecuting witness that it was whiskey and where to find it. While taking it up town to appellant, witness was caught by an officer, and destroyed the bottle. This was proof sufficient that the liquid was whiskey, and courts take judicial knowledge of the fact that whiskey is intoxicating. *Edgar*v. *State,*37 Ark. 218.

Appellant’s next assignment of error is that he could not be indicted, tried, and convicted as a principal because he was not present, aiding and abetting in the crime. The statute makes the crime of transporting alcoholic liquors a misdemeanor, and not a felony. In misdemeanors there are no accessories, so one who procures another to commit a misdemeanor is himself a principal in the crime. *Sanders*v. *State,*18 Ark. 195; *Stephens*v. *State,*164 Ark. 90.

No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62591-62592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25525]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering 
(CEOSE); Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science

[[Page 62592]]

Foundation announces the following meeting:

    Name: Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and 
Engineering (1173).
    Dates/Time: October 25, 2010, 8:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m., October 26, 
2010, 8:30 a.m.-2 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation (NSF), 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    To help facilitate your access into the building, please contact 
the individual listed below prior to the meeting so that a visitor's 
badge may be prepared for you in advance.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Margaret E.M. Tolbert, Senior Advisor and 
CEOSE Executive Liaison, Office of Integrative Activities, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Telephone Numbers: (703) 292-4216, 703-292-8040; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83eef7ecefe1e6f1f7c3edf0e5ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f79a83989b95928583b7998491d9909881">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Minutes: Minutes may be obtained from the Executive Liaison at 
the above address or the Web site at http://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/activities/ceose/index.jsp.
    Purpose of Meeting: To study NSF programs and policies and 
provide advice and recommendations to the National Science 
Foundation (NSF) concerning broadening participation in science and 
engineering.

Agenda

Monday and Tuesday, October 25-26, 2010

Opening Statements by the CEOSE Chairs

Presentations and Discussions:

[bcheck] Expanding Minority Participation: America's Science and 
Technology Talent at the Crossroads
[bcheck] Reports from CEOSE Liaisons to NSF Advisory Committees
[bcheck] Progress Report on Correcting the Multi-Race Coding Error 
in the Survey of Doctorate Recipients
[bcheck] The Process for Filling CEOSE Membership Vacancies
[bcheck] Appointment of CEOSE Liaisons to NSF Advisory Committees
[bcheck] Establishment of CEOSE Ad Hoc Subcommittees
[bcheck] An Update on Plans to Establish the Science of Broadening 
Participation Program
[bcheck] A Conversation with the Leader(s) of the National Science 
Foundation

    Dated: October 6, 2010.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-25525 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7118 

To amend section 242 of title 18, United States Code, to forbid the use 

of chokeholds by persons subject to that provision’s prohibitions, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 6, 2018 

Mr. JEFFRIES (for himself, Ms. BASS, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. CLAY, 

Mr. COHEN, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Ms. LOFGREN, 

Mr. NADLER, Ms. NORTON, Mr. RICHMOND, Mr. SERRANO, and Ms. 

LEE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 242 of title 18, United States Code, to 

forbid the use of chokeholds by persons subject to that 

provision’s prohibitions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Excessive Use of Force 

5 Prevention Act of 2018’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7118 IH

1 SEC. 2. CHOKEHOLDS AS CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS. 

2 Section 242 of title 18, United States Code, is 

3 amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘For the pur4 poses of this section, the application of any pressure to 

5 the throat or windpipe which may prevent or hinder 

6 breathing or reduce intake of air is a punishment, pain, 

7 or penalty.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
584 A.2d 208

#### BILMAN MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. v. VITETTA GROUP.

May 7, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 HERITAGE
        OAKS BANCORP
  Quarterly
        Report on Form 10Q
 for
        the
        Quarter ended June 30, 2005
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 Pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 The
        undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp
        (the
“Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that to my
        knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June
        30,
        2005, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission
        (the
“Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies
        with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange
        Act;
        and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents,
        in
        all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the
        Company.
 
 Date: August
                5 , 2005
              By:
              /s/ Lawrence
                P. WardLawrence
                P. Ward,President
                and Chief Executive Officer
 
 A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
          authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
          appears
          in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
          by Section 906, has been provided to Heritage Oaks Bancorp, and will be
          retained
          by Heritage Oaks Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
          or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62916-62917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25613]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 333]


Re-Delegation by the Under Secretary of State to the Director, 
Office of Chemical and Biological Weapons Affairs, of the Functions and 
Authorities Pertaining to the United States National Authority

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State by the 
laws of the United States, including by Section 101 of the Chemical 
Weapons Convention Implementation Act of 1998, Division I of Pub. L. 
105-277, codified at 22 U.S.C. 6711(c), and delegated to me by Section 
2(a)(12) of Delegation of Authority 293-1, dated January 12, 2007, I 
hereby re-delegate to the Director, Office of Chemical and Biological 
Weapons Affairs, Bureau of Arms Control,

[[Page 62917]]

Verification, and Compliance, to the extent authorized by law, the 
authorities and functions pertaining to the Director of the United 
States National Authority. This delegation of authority shall take 
effect on October 1, 2010.
    As used in this delegation of authority, the word ``function'' 
includes any duty, obligation, power, authority, responsibility, right, 
privilege, discretion or activity. A reference in this delegation of 
authority to a statute or delegation of authority shall be deemed to be 
a reference to such statute or delegation of authority as amended from 
time to time.
    Notwithstanding any provision of this delegation of authority, the 
Secretary of State, the Deputy Secretary, the Deputy Secretary for 
Management and Resources, and the Under Secretary for Arms Control and 
International Security may at any time exercise any function delegated 
by this delegation of authority.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: September 24, 2010.
Ellen O. Tauscher,
Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security.
[FR Doc. 2010-25613 Filed 10-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS
CERTIFICATION UNDER
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trico Marine Services, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  August 7, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Geoff JonesGeoff JonesChief Financial Officer