alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11.1-Statment of Computation of Earnings per Share
                  (In thousands except per-share date)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Three months ended          Six months ended
                                                      September 30               September 30
                                                   1997          1996          1997       1996
                                                   ----          ----          ----       ----
                                                      (unaudited)                (unaudited)

<S>                                                <C>            <C>          <C>        <C>
Average shares outstanding                         2,493          2,397        2,493      2,397

Net effect of dilutive stock options
  based on the treasury stock method
  using average market price                           -              -            -          -
                                                   ------          ------        ------      ------
Total                                              2,493           2,397         2,493       2,397
                                                   ======          ======        ======      ======
Net income (loss)                                  $ 112           $(396)        $ 116       $(575)
                                                   ======          ======        ======      ======
Per share amount                                   $ 0.04          $(0.17)       $ 0.05      $(0.24)
                                                   ======          ======        ======      ======

</TABLE>
Note:  Fully diluted earnings per share equals primary earnings per share.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         791,287
<SECURITIES>                                   400,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,567,978
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    887,633
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,985,457
<PP&E>                                         3,736,192
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,435,943
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,152,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,604,492
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       26,279
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,152,241
<SALES>                                        5,651,638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,651,638
<CGS>                                          2,507,021
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,275,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10,013
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             82,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (786,882)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   31,955
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (818,837)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (818,837)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
585 A.2d 352

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT MANCINE.

July 17, 1990.

Cross-petition for certification granted. (See 241 *N.J.Super.*166, 574 A.2d 525)
862 A.2d 539

#### IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD H. KRESS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

December 17, 2004.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that RICHARD H. KRESS of CLARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year effective August 11, 2003, by Order of this Court filed July 11, 2003, be reinstated to the practice of law effective immediately; and it is further

*155ORDERED that respondent shall practice under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics until the further Order of the Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Trico Marine Services, Inc.

Form 10-Q

Quarterly Report

Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2007







Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Joseph S. Compofelice, Chief Executive Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1.

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |     |                           | 
|----------------------- |  | --- | ------------------------- | 
|Date:  November 2, 2007 |  | By: | /s/ Joseph S. Compofelice | 
|                        |  |     | Joseph S. Compofelice     | 
|                        |  |     | Chief Executive Officer   | 



Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Geoff Jones, Chief Financial Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



1.

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |     |                         | 
|----------------------- |  | --- | ----------------------- | 
|Date:  November 2, 2007 |  | By: | /s/ Geoff Jones         | 
|                        |  |     | Geoff Jones             | 
|                        |  |     | Chief Financial Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,028,914
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                   0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                         0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     81,146,085
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         163,975,460
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           196,174,328
<LOANS>                                        199,788,805
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,109,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 471,989,502
<DEPOSITS>                                     361,303,456
<SHORT-TERM>                                    59,543,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,124,330
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         6,441,504
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,386,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 471,798,502
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,909,668
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,073,290
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                         0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,982,958
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,514,209
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,357,479
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,625,479
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      256,217
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,415,030
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,648,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,886,444
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,469,444
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,469,444
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .97
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        3.06
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,005,061
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,005,061
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,149,174
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      302,846
<RECOVERIES>                                         7,296
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,109,841
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,109,941
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MITY Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul
R. Killpack, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date: July 26, 2005                     /s/ Paul R. Killpack
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Paul R. Killpack
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Coconino Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Flagstaff, Arizona. The purpose of the meeting is to receive training on Resource Advisory Committees and National Environmental Policy Act, Travel Reimbursement procedures, establish proposal meeting dates, and proposal outreach. No proposals will be heard at this meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held October 28, 2010, beginning at 1 p.m. to approximately 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held in the Ponderosa Room of the Coconino County Health Department, 2625 N. King St., Flagstaff, Arizona 86004. Send written comments to Brady Smith, RAC Coordinator, Coconino Resource Advisory Committee, c/o Forest Service, USDA, 1824 S. Thompson St., Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 or electronically to                         *bradysmith@fs.fed.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brady Smith, Coconino National Forest, (928) 527-3490.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda items for this meeting include discussion about (1) Training about Resource Advisory Committees; (2) Training about National Environmental Policy Act; (3) Travel Reimbursement procedures; (4) Options for project proposal outreach. The meeting is open to the public.

Dated: September 30, 2010.

M. Earl Stewart, 

Forest Supervisor, Coconino National Forest.

[FR Doc. 2010-25219 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
585 A.2d 400

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. YUCEL CENGIZ.

October 16, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 241 *N.J.Super.*482, 575 A.2d 504)
EXHIBIT 11

              Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings

               Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2003 and 2002

                (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Three months ended           Nine months ended
                                                         March 31,                   March 31,
                                                 -------------------------   -------------------------
                                                    2003           2002         2003           2002
                                                 -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
<S>                                              <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Net income ...................................   $     3,572   $     3,604   $    11,220   $    10,728
                                                 ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========

Number of shares outstanding:
Weighted average shares issued ...............    11,900,000    11,900,000    11,900,000    11,900,000
Less: Weighted average shares held in treasury     4,791,118     4,450,067     4,689,711     4,339,762
Less: Average shares held by the ESOP ........       952,000       952,000       952,000       952,000
Plus: ESOP shares released or committed to be
           released during the fiscal year ...       793,199       675,393       763,009       647,298
                                                 -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
Average basic shares .........................     6,950,081     7,173,326     7,021,298     7,255,536
Plus: Average common stock equivalents .......       514,710       529,671       525,230       534,845
                                                 -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
Average diluted shares .......................     7,464,791     7,702,997     7,546,527     7,790,381
                                                 ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========

Earnings per common share:
        Basic ................................   $      0.51   $      0.50   $      1.60   $      1.48
                                                 ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========
        Diluted ..............................   $      0.48   $      0.47   $      1.49   $      1.38
                                                 ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========
</TABLE>


                                       29
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the accompanying Quarterly Report of Targeted Genetics Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, H. Stewart Parker,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
## United States Court of App eals
F O R T H E E I G H T H C I R C U I T

__ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 1- 15 82

__ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca, *
* App el le e, *
* App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s v. * Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r th e * Dis tri ct of Ne br as ka

. Kalv in Tho m as , * * [UNPUBLISHED] App el la nt

. *

__ __ __ __ __ _ Su bm it te d: Nov em

be r 16 , 20 11 Fi le d: Ju ly 6, 20 12

__ __ __ __ __ _ Befo re RI LEY, Chi ef J ud ge , BEAM an d B YE, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ _ PER CURI AM.

Kalv in Tho m as ap pe al s hi s sente nc e fo r poss es sio n wit h in te nt to di st rib ut e fiv e gr am s or m or e of co cai ne ba se , in vi ol at io n of 21 U.S.C. § 84 1( a)(1 ) an d pu ni sh ab le

un de r 21 U.S.C. § 8 41 (b )(1 ). The of fen se oc cu rred on Mar ch 1, 20 10 , and Tho m as
was in di ct ed in Apr il 20 10

. The Fai r Sen te nc in g Act (FSA), whi ch am en de d th e th res ho ld qu an ti ti es of cr ac k co ca ine trig ge rin g m an da to ry m in im um se nt en ces un de r § 84 1 an d m an da te d am en dm en ts to th e Uni te d St at es Sen te nc in g Gui de li ne s, be cam e effe ct iv e on Aug us t 3, 20 10

. On Nov em be r 5, 20 10 , Tho m as pl ead ed gu il ty an d he

was sen te nc ed on Feb ru ary 28 , 20 11

.At th e se nt en ci ng he ari ng , th e di st ric t co ur t cal cu la te d a Gui de li ne s se nt en ci ng

ran ge of 18 8 to 23 5 m on th s' im pr is on m en t. Tho m as ur ge d th e di st ric t co ur t to ap pl y th e FSA to hi s se nt en ce, whi ch wou ld ha ve lo wered hi s rang e. Ru li ng th at th e FSA di d no t ap pl y to co nd uc t pr ed at in g th e Act's effe ct iv e da te , th e di st ric t co ur t se nt en ced Tho m as to 18 8 m on t h s ' i mp r i so nm en t. At th e ti m e of se nt en ci ng , Tho m as 's FSA ret ro act iv it y arg um en t was fo recl os ed by ou r de ci si on in Uni te d St at es v. Si dn ey , 64 8 F.3 d 90 4, 91 0 ( 8 t h C ir. 20 11 ) (h ol di ng th at "t he FSA is no t ret ro act iv e, ev en as to de fen da nt s who were se nt en ced aft er th e en act m en t of th e FSA whe re th ei r cri m in al

co nd uc t o ccu rred be fo re t he en act m en t" ). The Su pr em e Co ur t re cen tl y reject ed th e
reas on in g of Si dn ey , ru li ng th at th e FSA ap pl ie s ret ro act iv el y to th os e who co m m it te d cri m in al co nd uc t be fo re, bu t who were se nt en ced aft er, it s pa ss ag e. Dor se y v. Uni te d St at es , No. 11 -5 68 3, 20 12 W L 23 44 46 3, at *9 -1 5 (J un e 21 , 20 12 ). Acco rd in gl y , we
rev ers e an d re m an d fo r res en te nc in g, p ur su an t t o Do rs ey

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
#### White *v.*The State.

Criminal Law, 17 C. J. p. 293, n. 47.

Juries, 35 C. J. p. 269, n. 9.

No. 6440.

March 15, 1928.

Murder. Before Judge Mathews. Bibb superior court. January 7, 1928.

*R. B. Jones*and *C. Baxter Jones,*for plaintiff in error.

*George M. Napier, attorney-general, Charles U. Garrett, solicitor-general,*and *T. R. Gress, assistant attorney-general,*contra.

Hines, J.

1. Except in the selection of tales jurors as provided in sections 858 and 863 of the Penal Code, the judges of the superior courts shall draw petit jurors from apartment No. 1 of the petit-jury box, depositing the names so drawn in apartment No. 2- of said box; and when all names are drawn out of apartment No. 1, then the drawing shall commence from apartment No. 2, and the tickets be returned to apartment No. 1, and so on alternately. Penal Code (1910), §§ 819, 820, 822, 823, 856, 858, 863.

2. The right of trial by jury, as guaranteed by the constitution of this State, involves, as a necessary and indisputable requisite, the right of one indicted for felony to select the jury for the trial of his case from an array or panel indifferently drawn or chosen as provided by law from the whole body of citizens, and not from a restricted number thereof, qualified to serve as jurors for such trial. *Pollard*v. *State,*148 *Ga.*447 (96 S. E. 997).

3. Accordingly, it was good cause of challenge to the array, in the trial of a murder case, that the judge of the superior court, who drew the regular jurors embraced in such array, did so by taking from an alphabetical and numerical list of all jurors in the traverse-jury box every tenth juror on said list, commencing with number eight, and thus drawing until the necessary number to make up the panel was drawn, and by locating the corresponding numbers' on the cards in said jury box and removing them therefrom.

4. The trial judge erred in overruling the challenge to the array, and this rendered nugatory the subsequent trial of the defendant.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All Hie Justices concur.*