alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Winston Campbell, Appellant.

[774 NYS2d 806]

Appeal by the *624defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), rendered February 7, 2001, convicting him of arson in the first degree and assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention raised in his supplemental pro se brief that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of arson in the first degree and assault in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]); *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10 [1995]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245 [1989]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, proof of his indebtedness was admissible as evidence of motive *(see People v Molineux,*168 NY 264, 293 [1901]).

To the extent that the defendant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel raised in his supplemental pro se brief involve matter dehors the record, they may not be reviewed on direct appeal *(see People v Aguirre,*304 AD2d 771 [2003]; *People v O’Connor,*291 AD2d 573 [2002]; *People v Weekes,*289 AD2d 599 [2001]; *People v Wells,*288 AD2d 408, 409 [2001]). Insofar as we are able to review the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the defense counsel’s performance provided meaningful representation *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 714 [1998]; *People v Satterfield,*66 NY2d 796, 798-799 [1985]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; *People v Wicker,*229 AD2d 602 [1996]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Altman, J.P., Smith, S. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Conell GALLE.

No. 2011-KK-0441.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 11, 2011.

In re Galle, Conell; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 489-028; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0265.

Denied.
#### Peterson M. YOKUM, et al. v. NICHOLAS S. KARNO II, INC., et al.

No. 2010-CC-2160.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re James River Insurance Company; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. N, No. 09-6340; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-C-0272.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Emanuel A. JOHNSON.

No. 2009-KP-2375.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 29, 2010.

In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial *292District Court Div. F, No. 05-F0017; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,023-KH.

Denied.
627 A.2d 1133

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIE JOHNSON.

March 25, 1993.

Petition for certification is granted and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for reconsideration in light of *State v. Silva,*131 *N.J.*438, 621 A.2d 17 (1993). Jurisdiction is not retained.
|                                                                             | Three Months EndedSeptember 30, 2000          | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2000
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------
|                                                                             | (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|Basic earnings per common share                                              |                                               |                                    
|Net income available to common shareholders                                  | $2,235                                        | $6,733                             
|Weighted average common shares outstanding                                   | 6,480,686                                     | 6,456,541                          
|Basic earnings per common share                                              | $.34                                          | $1.04                              
|Diluted earnings per common share                                            |                                               |                                    
|Net income available to common shareholders                                  | $2,235                                        | $6,733                             
|Weighted average common shares outstanding                                   | 6,480,686                                     | 6,456,541                          
|Add:  Dilutive effects of assumed exercises of    stock options and warrants | 317,786                                       | 285,568                            
|Weighted average common and dilutive potential    common shares outstanding  | 6,798,472                                     | 6,742,109                          
|Dilutive earnings per common share                                           | $.33                                          | $1.00
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 720 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 720

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to improve 
            attorney accountability, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. ATTORNEY ACCOUNTABILITY.

    (a) Sanctions Under Rule 11.--Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of 
Civil Procedure is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``may'' and inserting 
        ``shall'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``Rule 5'' and all that 
        follows through ``motion.'' and inserting ``Rule 5.''; and
            (3) in paragraph (4), by striking ``situated'' and all that 
        follows through the end of the paragraph and inserting 
        ``situated, and to compensate the parties that were injured by 
        such conduct. Subject to the limitations in paragraph (5), the 
        sanction shall consist of an order to pay to the party or 
        parties the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred as a 
        direct result of the violation, including reasonable attorneys' 
        fees and costs. The court may also impose additional 
        appropriate sanctions, such as striking the pleadings, 
        dismissing the suit, or other directives of a non-monetary 
        nature, or, if warranted for effective deterrence, an order 
        directing payment of a penalty into the court.''.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act or an amendment made 
by this Act shall be construed to bar or impede the assertion or 
development of new claims, defenses, or remedies under Federal, State, 
or local laws, including civil rights laws, or under the Constitution 
of the United States.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 720

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to improve 
            attorney accountability, and for other purposes.
```
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7395 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to allow delivery 

of medical supplies by unmanned aerial systems, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 21, 2018 

Mr. MEADOWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, and Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

allow delivery of medical supplies by unmanned aerial 

systems, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE MEDICAL POTEN4 TIAL OF UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS. 

5 It is the sense of Congress that unmanned aerial sys6 tems have the potential to improve medical care for rural 

7 populations and for patients in acute situations in need 

8 of immediate care and without immediate access to care 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7395 IH

1 providers, and that such technologies should be utilized 

2 where practicable. 

3 SEC. 2. CONFIRMATION OF MEDICARE REIMBURSEMENT 

4 ELIGIBILITY. 

5 The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 

6 not prohibit any program administered by the Centers for 

7 Medicare and Medicaid Services or the Indian Health 

8 Service from reimbursing hospitals or other medical pro9 viders for the use of unmanned aerial systems for delivery 

10 of medical supplies to hospitals, ambulances, or directly 

11 to sites of medical emergencies occurring away from hos12 pitals and ambulances. 

13 SEC. 3. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AND FLIGHT 

14 OF UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS BEYOND 

15 LINE OF SIGHT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES. 

16 The Federal Aviation Administration, in issuing rule17 making for unmanned aerial system delivery as directed 

18 by section 44808 of title 49, United States Code, shall 

19 not prohibit the operation of unmanned aerial systems for 

20 medical purposes beyond the line of sight, consistent with 

21 other rules and regulations made applicable to all un22 manned aerial systems in such rulemaking. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

HERITAGE OAKS BANCORP

 

Quarterly Report on Form 10QSBfor the Quarter ended September 30, 2003

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officerof Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USCSection 1350,  that (i) the QuarterlyReport on Form 10QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed by theCompany with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Quarterly Report”), towhich this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicablerequirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) theinformation contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  October 16, 2003 |                                                  | /s/ Margaret A. Torres |   |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|                               | Margaret A. Torres                                    |
|                               | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
#### Ronald F. MELLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D10-2981.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 20, 2011.

Ronald F. Mellor, Doral, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene C. Hvizd, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant’s postcon-viction motion as untimely is reversed. *Small v. State,*941 So.2d 555 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). The two-year time limit for seeking postconviction relief did not begin to run until the mandate issued for this court’s affirmance of the belated direct appeal of appellant’s conviction and sentence. *Mellor v. State,*968 So.2d 575 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (table) (mandate issued December 5, 2007). This matter is remanded for further proceedings on the postconviction motion.

*Reversed and remanded for further •proceedings.*

MAY, C.J., WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
#### Richard L. REYNOLDS v. Robert BORDELON III, Robert Bordelon Jr., Usagencies Casualty Insurance Company, Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange, and/or Called Auto Club Family Insurance d/b/a “Triple A Insurance,” Nissan North America with Nissan being a Parent Company of Infinity Division of North America, Inc., a Luxury Car Division of Nissan Motors, Insurance Auto Auctions Corp., ABC Insurance, DEF Insurance Company, XYZ Insurance Company.

No. 2010-CC-1711.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 29, 2010.

In re Insurance Auto Auctions Corp.; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory *285and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 2009-11451; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 0227.

Denied.

VICTORY and GUIDRY, JJ., would grant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                        201,073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               201,073
<CGS>                                          181,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  281,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (156)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,181
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,525
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,656
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,656
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25509]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EG10-48-000; EG10-51-000; EG10-52-000; EG10-53-000; EG10-
54-000; EG10-55-000; EG10-56-000]


Eagle Creek Hydro Power, LLC; Laredo Ridge Wind, LLC; RRI Energy 
West, Inc.; Goshen Phase II LLC; Solar Partners I, LLC; Solar Partners 
II, LLC; Solar Partners VIII, LLC; Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt 
Wholesale Generator Status

October 1, 2010.
    Take notice that during the month of September 2010, the status of 
the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became 
effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 
366.7(a).

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25509 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### STATE ex rel. Michael J. Sopczak v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0684.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 1, 2011.

In re Sopczak, Michael J.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 18,997; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KA 0400.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Kelly E. Lang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the amended quarterly report of Merix Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for
the quarterly period ended September 1, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Merix Corporation.



|                                                     |  |                  
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|                                                     | 
|By:                                                  |  | /s/ KELLY E. LANG
|Kelly E. Lang                                       
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                       

December 26, 2007
EXHIBIT
32.2





STATEMENT
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





The
undersigned, Laurie L. Latham, is the Chief Financial Officer of ViewCast.com,
Inc. (the “Company”). This statement is being furnished in connection with the
filing by the Company of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”).




By
execution of this statement, I certify that:




(A)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
      78o(d)) and




(B)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
  Report.




This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





November 16, 2009
                      
                      /s/  Laurie L.
    LathamDate
                      
                      Laurie
      L. LathamChief
      Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7181 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7181

 To establish the number of Members of the House of Representatives at 
                                  400.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 28, 2018

   Mr. Issa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish the number of Members of the House of Representatives at 
                                  400.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``400 Act''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVES AT 400.

    (a) In General.--Section 22(a) of the Act entitled ``An Act to 
provide for the fifteenth and subsequent decennial census and to 
provide for apportionment of Representatives in Congress'', approved 
June 18, 1929 (2 U.S.C. 2a(a)), is amended by striking ``the then 
existing number of Representatives'' and inserting ``400 
Representatives''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to the regular decennial census conducted for 2020 
and each subsequent decennial census.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Kelly E. Lang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Merix Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended November 25, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Merix Corporation.



|    |  |                                             
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ KELLY E. LANG                           
|    |  | Kelly E. Lang                               
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|    |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

January 4, 2007