alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; T32 Teleconference.                    

*Date:*                         October 25, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Phillip F. Wiethorn, Scientific Review Administrator, DHHS/NIH/NINDS/DER/SRB, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 3203, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-5388,                         *wiethorp@ninds.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: September 30, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-25297 Filed 10-6-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Order entered May 1, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00538-CV

IN RE PATRICK DOAK, JERRY ZEMANSKI AND STEVEN BIN, Relators

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-00538-2013

ORDER

The Court has before it relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. The Court requests that 

real party in interest and respondent file any responses by May 10, 2013.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

JUSTICE
#### Marylynn FALCO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D09-4577.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 15, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 15, 2010.

MaryLynn Falco, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the denial of her rule 3.800(c) motion for reduction and/or mitigation of sentence. Despite the language in the order of dismissal informing appellant that she had thirty days to appeal, there is no right to appeal from the denial of a rule 3.800(c) motion. *See Reeves v. State,*23 So.3d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); *Howard v. State,*914 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

WARNER, POLEN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
#### James A. ERNY v. LOUISIANA STATE EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and Terrebonne Levee and Conservation District.

No. 2010-CC-2174.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Erny, James A.; —Plaintiff;' Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. C580865; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 0831.

Denied.
867 A.2d 479

#### IN THE MATTER OF DANIEL S. CHILEWICH AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

February 16, 2005.

ORDER

DANIEL S. CHILEWICH of NEW YORK, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, having pleaded guilty in the New York State Supreme Court to offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, a class E felony, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*1:20 — 13(b)(1), DANIEL S. CHILEWICH is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that DANIEL S. CHILEWICH be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

*435ORDERED that DANIEL S. CHILEWICH comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-10T16:56:33Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-10T16:56:35Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-10T16:56:35Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="68732">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-10T16:56:33Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>clrevu ~ellom Aus-rm. - 
</p>
<p>--o- </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7435** 

WINCHAUS HAYES , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

– Appellee , and
ERIC D. WILSON, Warden; CHARLES E. SAMUELS, Director, FBOP; (MR.) LAWSON, Supervisor , Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:14

- cv - 00532

- RAJ

- LRL )

Submitted : December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Winchaus Angelo Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Lynn Van Valkenburg, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Winchaus Angelo Hayes appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his complaint . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hayes v. United States , No. 2:14

- cv - 00532

- RAJ

- LRL (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2016) . We dispense with oral argument because the fact s and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE ex rel. Johnny HENDERSON, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0616.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

In re Henderson Jr., Johnny; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 271,869; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,-369-KH.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Leonidas Dean LOWRY.

No. 11-314.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Nov. 2, 2011.

*1013Bradley R. Burget, District Attorney, Seventh Judicial District, David R. Opper-man, Assistant District Attorney, Vidalia, LA, for Appellee, State of Louisiana.

Peter John, O’Neal Legal, L.L.C., Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendant/Appellant, Leonidas Dean Lowry.

Court composed of SYLVIA R. COOKS, JAMES T. GENOVESE, and PHYLLIS M. KEATY, Judges.

GENOVESE, Judge.

hln this criminal matter, Defendant, Leonidas Dean Lowry, was convicted by a jury of attempted simple burglary, a violation of La.R.S. 14:27 and La.R.S. 14:62. He was sentenced to serve six years at hard labor with the Louisiana Department of Corrections. He has appealed his conviction, assigning as errors ineffective assistance of counsel and insufficiency of the evidence. For the following reasons, we affirm Defendant’s conviction.

ERRORS PATENT

In accordance with La.Code Crim.P. art. 920, all appeals are reviewed for errors patent on the face of the record. After reviewing the record, we find there are no errors patent.

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER 1

*Ineffective Assistance of Counsel*

Defendant argues he was denied effective assistance of counsel at trial. He contends his attorney did nothing when he “indicated that he felt pressured by the District Attorney to accept a plea deal” that he believed violated his right to a presumption of innocence. Defendant also argues that his attorney inadequately investigated an evidentiary issue, failed to effectively communicate with him and his family about trial strategy, and failed to prepare a memorandum regarding sentencing.

The issue of ineffective assistance of counsel is more appropriately addressed in an application for post-conviction relief where an evidentiary hearing can be conducted in the trial court. *State ex rel. A.B.,*09-870 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/9/09), 25 So.3d 1012. However, where an ineffective assistance claim is raised on appeal, this court may address the merits of the claim if the record discloses sufficient evidence to rule on it. *Id.*

|2In this case, the record does not address Defendant’s argument and, thus, does not contain sufficient evidence to determine whether counsel was ineffective.1 Consequently, this issue is appropriately relegated to post-conviction relief.

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER 2

*Sufficiency of the Evidence*

In his second assignment of error, Defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial because he was convicted with insufficient evidence. However, in his brief, Defendant fails to adequately and fully address this assignment of error. Therefore, Defendant has abandoned this assignment of error. Uniform Rules-Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-12.4.

DISPOSITION

Defendant’s conviction is affirmed. Defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of *1014counsel is appropriately relegated to post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED.

1

. Defendant’s original filing also included an affidavit that was not submitted to the trial court and is not part of the record on appeal. Thus, it may not be considered here. *State v. Savoy,*10-1140 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/11/11), 64 So.3d 457.
856 A.2d 33

#### In the Matter of Philip L. KANTOR

No. 908 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

June 29, 2004.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2004, Philip L. Kantor having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of three months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated November 21, 2003; the said Philip L. Kantor having been directed on March 30, 2004, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Philip L. Kantor is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of three *388months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
#### Todd AUBREY, et al. v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 2011-CC-2320.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re Zurich American Insurance Company et al.; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 2008-2403; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 11-00652.

Denied.
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

 

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2014,by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC,as Special Servicer, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent andCustodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC as Operating Advisor withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2014-UBS3 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section10.11 of this Agreement, Leslie Hayton Managing Director of Commercial MortgageServices and Timothy S. Ryan, Managing Director of Customer RelationshipManagement do hereby certify that:

 

1.      Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.      To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/ Leslie Hayton

Leslie Hayton

Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

/s/ Timothy S. Ryan

Timothy S. Ryan

Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-25-1998
<CASH>                                            4,061
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    98,296
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                     114,069
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                220,731
<PP&E>                                          183,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  451,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           103,147
<BONDS>                                           8,225
<COMMON>                                        302,597
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    451,200
<SALES>                                         118,246
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                118,246
<CGS>                                            75,282
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   104,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    764
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  777
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  12,118
<INCOME-TAX>                                      4,267
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               7,851
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      7,851
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.40
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7300 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7300

     To provide for a one-time safe harbor for certain failures by 
                individuals to pay estimated income tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 13, 2018

  Ms. Judy Chu of California (for herself, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Larson of 
 Connecticut, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Higgins of New York, 
 and Ms. Sanchez) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide for a one-time safe harbor for certain failures by 
                individuals to pay estimated income tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taxpayer Penalty Protection Act of 
2018''.

SEC. 2. SAFE HARBOR FOR FAILURE BY INDIVIDUALS TO PAY ESTIMATED INCOME 
              TAX.

    In the case of a taxable year beginning in 2018--
            (1) section 6654(d)(1)(B)(ii) of the Internal Revenue Code 
        of 1986 shall be applied by substituting ``80 percent'' for 
        ``100 percent''; and
            (2) the table in section 6654(d)(1)(C) of such Code shall 
        be applied by substituting ``100'' for ``110''.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUOMAN CHEN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-73481

Agency No. A070-036-839

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2013** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Luoman Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for an abuse of discretion the

FILED

FEB 15 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-73481

BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. He v. Gonzales, 501 F.3d 1128, 1130-31 (9th

Cir. 2007). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Chen’s motion to reopen as

untimely because the motion was filed over thirteen years late, see 8 C.F.R. §

1003.2(c)(2), and, even accepting Chen’s and his family’s claims as true, he failed

to demonstrate a material change in circumstances in China to qualify for the

regulatory exception to the time limit for filing a motion to reopen, see 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); see also Lin v. Holder, 588 F.3d 981, 988-89 (9th Cir. 2009)

(record did not establish change in family planning laws or enforcement of such

laws that would establish changed country conditions excusing untimely motion to

reopen); He, 501 F.3d at 1132 (change in personal circumstances does not establish

changed circumstances in country of origin). Because the BIA considered Chen’s

evidence in reaching its conclusion, we reject Chen’s contention that the BIA

dismissed his evidence as not credible. Finally, we lack jurisdiction to review the

BIA’s discretionary decision declining to exercise its sua sponte authority under 8

C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). See Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder, 633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th

Cir. 2011).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.