alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Kelly E. Lang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Merix Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended December 1, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Merix Corporation.



|    |  |                                             
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------
|   
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ KELLY E. LANG                           
|    |  | Kelly E. Lang                               
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|    |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|    | 
|    |  | January 10, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          10,369
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          15,935
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   429
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                54,919
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,019,003
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        797,869
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,680
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,967,692
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,074,260
<SHORT-TERM>                                   687,742
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             19,431
<LONG-TERM>                                     29,792
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           35,280
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           122
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,065
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,967,692
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 34,431
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,818
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                23,036
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                64,285
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              31,612
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,733
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,552
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      625
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               3,065
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,384
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,426
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,426
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,392)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    1.42
<LOANS-NON>                                     10,825
<LOANS-PAST>                                    14,195
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   420
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 14,284
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,594
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      446
<RECOVERIES>                                        16
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,680
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,680
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,222
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF AP P EALS, T HIRD DISTRICT, AT AUST IN

NO. 03-12-00550- CV
Appellan ts, The City of Brady; the Zoning Board of Adjustm ent of the City of Brady, Texas; G ail Loh n, in her off icial capacity as Mayorof the City of B rady; Mar y Bradshaw , Brendan Weatherm an, Missi Davis, L ind a Lott, and Marilyn Gendusa, in their off icial capacities as M em bers of the City Council of the City of Brady; Dale Brown, i n hi s off icial capacity as City M anager of the City of Brady // Cross-Appellants, Jon Ch ase, Kadhrann J. Hall m ark, F reder ica Bank er, Jo K elly Rutherford, L.W. McIntosh, Stephan ie Wiesen, Bliss Colli er, V irginia Napp er, R obert He rnandez, Connie Hernand ez, P am ela Cantre ll, and Evere tte Rohr

v. Appellees, Jon Chase, Kadhrann J. Hal lm ark, F reder ica Bank er, Jo K elly Rutherford, L.W. McIntosh, Stephan ie Wiesen, Bliss Colli er, V irginia Napp er, R obert He rnandez, Connie Hernand ez, P am ela Cantre ll, and Evere tte Rohr // Cross-Appellees, The City of Brady; the Z onin g Board of Adjustm ent of the City of Brady, T exas; G ail Loh n, in her off icial capacity as Mayorof the City of B rady; Mar y Bradshaw , Brendan Weatherm an, Missi Davis, Lin da Lott, and Marilyn Ge ndu sa, in their of fi cial capacities as M em bers of the City Council of the City of B rady; Dale Brown, in his of fi cial capacity as City M anager of the City of B rady

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F MCCULLO CH COUNTY , 198 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 201 2072 , H ONO RAB LE MELVI N REX EMERSO N, JR., J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The parties have filed an agree d motion for dismiss al of their pending interlocutory appea ls. They state that the parties have resolved their dispute by a wr i t t en compromise and settlement ag ree ment and re q u est that the case be rema nded to the district court for entry of an ag ree d final judgme nt. We g rant the motion, dismiss the pending interlocutory appea ls, and rema nd the case to the trial court for further proce eding s in acc ordanc e with the settlement agree ment. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a)
. 1

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Goodwin and F ield Dismissed on Ag ree d Motion Filed: Jul y

10, 2014

Also pendingbefor e this Court is appellants/cross appe llees’ motion to dismiss cause as 1 moot, which motion we dismiss as moot. 2
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Carl ENGLAND.

No. 2011-KO-0456.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 2011.

In re England, Carl; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 396,443; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KA 1246.

Denied.
#### Leondray KIRKLAND, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-3132.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 31, 2011.

Leondray Kirkland, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Brooke Poland, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking a belated appeal of the judgment and sentence rendered on November 22, 2010, in Duval County Circuit Court case number 2009-CF-7708 is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall be furnished to the lower tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. The Court notes that the lower tribunal has already appointed the Office of the Public Defender, Fourth Judicial Circuit, to represent petitioner on appeal, and construes the order of appoint*976ment as extending to the belated appeal authorized by this opinion.

VAN NORTWICK, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          47,030
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,128,920
<ALLOWANCES>                                   116,187
<INVENTORY>                                    532,591
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,724,672
<PP&E>                                       3,758,240
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,117,381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,641,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,440,304
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,791
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,866,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,641,805
<SALES>                                      8,726,734
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,726,734
<CGS>                                        4,804,602
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,804,602
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,339,323
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             116,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (534,034)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (534,034)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.18)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of South Jersey Gas Company (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David A. Kindlick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ David A. KindlickName: David A. KindlickTitle: Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 28, 2011
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BARRY M. ATKINS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. CALYPSO SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation ; EDEN KIM,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 15125
D.C. No. 2:14

- cv - 02706

- NVW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Neil V. Wake, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 18, 2017 **
Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. Barry M. Atkins appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment

in his diversity action alleging state law claims in connection with a dispute over a

debt

- to

- stock conversion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 20 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 15125

review de novo, Luko vsky v. City of San Francisco , 535 F.3d 1044, 1047 (9th Cir. 2008), and we affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment on Atkins’ contract

claims because they are barred by the ap plicable statute of limitations under

California law

. See Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 337(1) ( four

- year statute of limitations for any action upon a contract ); Krieger v. Nick Alexander Imports, Inc. , 285 Cal. Rptr. 717 (Ct. App. 1991) (section 337(1) applies to claims of breach of covenant of good faith and fair dea ling). The district court properly concluded that Atkins was not entitled to equitable estoppel. See Kennedy v. Allied Mut. Ins. Co. , 952
F.2d 262, 26 6 (9th Cir. 1991) (a party cannot create an dispute of fact with an affidavit contradicting his prior de position testimony); Vu v. Prudential Prop. &

Cas. Ins. Co. , 33 P.3d 487 ( Cal. 2001) (equitable estoppel under California law requires reliance be reasonable ). The district court properly granted summary judgment on Atkins’ tort claims because they are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations under Arizona law

. See Hullett v. Cousin , 63 P.3d 1029, 1034 ( Ariz. 2003) ( two

- year statute of limitations for negligent misrepresentation); Walker v. Walker , 500 P.2d 898, 899

- 900 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1972) ( t wo - year statute of limitations for conversion); San3 17

- 15125

Manuel Copper Corp. v. Redmond , 445 P.2d 162, 166 ( Ariz. Ct. App. 1968) ( four

year statute of limitations for unjust enrichment )

. The district court did not abuse its discretion by awarding attorney’s fees pursuant to its inherent powers. See Chambers v. NASCO, Inc. , 501 U.S. 32, 45

-
46 , 50 (1991) (stating standard of review and explaining that a court may assess attorney’s fees when a fraud has been practiced upon it).

A ppellees ’ request for attorney’ s fees on appeal, set forth in their answering
brief, is denied without prejudice to filing a motion in accordance with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Ninth Circuit Rule 39

- 1.6.

AFFIRMED.
647 A.2d 470

#### IN THE MATTER OF DENNIS C. LARSEN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 23, 1994.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court recommending that by way of reciprocal discipline DENNIS C. LARSEN of NORWOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years on the basis of a three-year suspension from practice imposed in the State of New York for neglect, failure to communicate with a client, conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, failure to cooperate in ethics investigations and failure to register as an attorney and to maintain an office for the practice of law within the State of New York, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and DENNIS C. LARSEN of NORWOOD is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years, effective October 1, 1992, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further _

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Regulation 23 of the Administrative Guidelines Governing Suspended Attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that no application for reinstatement to the practice of law be made unless and until respondent has been reinstated to the practice of law in the State of New York; and it is further

*35ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Office of Attorney Ethics and the Disciplinary Review Board for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase CommercialMortgage Securities Corp. 

383 Madison Avenue

31st Floor

New York, New York 10179

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C19, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C19

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7247 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority 

of MA organizations to provide waivers from Medicare Advantage plans’ 

prior authorization requirements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2018 

Mr. BRADY of Texas (for himself and Mr. SHIMKUS) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in 

addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify 

the authority of MA organizations to provide waivers 

from Medicare Advantage plans’ prior authorization requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Incentivizing Shared 

5 Risk in Medicare Advantage Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 7247 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF MA ORGANIZATIONS TO PROVIDE 

2 WAIVERS FROM MEDICARE ADVANTAGE 

3 PLANS’ PRIOR AUTHORIZATION REQUIRE4 MENTS. 

5 Section 1857(e) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 1395w–27(e)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(5) AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE WAIVERS FROM

9 PLAN PRIOR AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENTS.—In 

10 the case of an MA organization with a contract 

11 under this section that applies a prior authorization 

12 requirement with respect to any item or service cov13 ered under the Medicare Advantage plan offered by 

14 such organization, such organization may provide for 

15 a waiver from such requirement for any provider of 

16 services or supplier, as specified by the organization, 

17 furnishing such an item or service, including a pro18 vider of services or supplier that participates in a 

19 risk-sharing arrangement or value-based payment 

20 arrangement, as such terms are defined by the orga21 nization.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7243 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7243

    To amend Public Law 115-217 to change the address of the postal 
facility designated by such Public Law in honor of Sergeant First Class 
             Alwyn Crendall Cashe, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 10, 2018

    Mrs. Murphy of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend Public Law 115-217 to change the address of the postal 
facility designated by such Public Law in honor of Sergeant First Class 
             Alwyn Crendall Cashe, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO CHANGE ADDRESS OF POSTAL FACILITY DESIGNATED BY 
              PUBLIC LAW 115-217.

    In section 1(a) of Public Law 115-217, strike ``567 East Franklin 
Street'' and insert ``83 Geneva Drive''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Daniel HINTON, Jr.

No. 2009-K-0821.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. N, No. 12-07-0226; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2008 KA 1849.

Not considered; not timely filed.
#### Carl MILLS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-4759.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 19, 2011.

Carl Mills, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We hereby grant the petition for writ of mandamus. The circuit court shall rule on the pending motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, within a reasonable time, not to exceed 30 days from issuance of mandate in this cause. Because we are confident that the circuit court will issue a ruling, we withhold issuance of the formal writ.

DAVIS, HAWKES, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
NO MEMOS FILED TODAY.