alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No. 333-140238)and (No. 333-104105) on Form S-8 and Registration Statements (No. 333-146691,333-138405) on Form S-3 of Senesco Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiary ofour report dated September 26, 2008 relating to our audit of theconsolidated financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Senesco Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiary for the year ended June 30,2008.

 

 

**/s/ MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP**

NewYork, New York

 

September 26,2008

 

----
#### Denise America MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 3D10-900.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 8, 2010.

Lopez & Best and Virginia M. Best, for petitioner.

Thomas L. Hunker, General Counsel, for respondent.

Before WELLS, SHEPHERD, and SALTER, JJ.

SHEPHERD, J.

This is a petition for second-tier certio-rari in a case involving Personal Injury Protection benefits. The petition is hereby denied on the authority of *United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Santa Fe Medical Center,*21 So.3d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (en banc), petition for review pending, No. SC09-2100, proceedings stayed (Fla. Jan. 5, 2010), and *United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Metro Injury & Rehab Center,*16 So.3d 897 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009), petition for review pending, No. SC09-1946, proceedings stayed (Fla. Jan. 5, 2010).

Petition denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6846

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DAVID R. SPECYALSKI, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. Bruce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 6:16

- cr
- 00774

- BHH

- 1 )

Submitted : September 26, 2019 Decided: October 1, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
David R. Specyalski, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David R. Specyalski, Jr., appea ls the district court’s text order denying his motion
for a sentence reduction

. Initially, we conclude that Specyalski brought this motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and that the motion should not be construed as arising under 28 U.S.C. § 2 255 (2012). Cf. Castro v. United States , 540 U.S. 375, 383 (2003) (holding that district court must warn pro se litigant of intent to recharacterize pleading as § 2255 motion , explain procedural consequences, and provid e litigant opportunity to respond). A defendant is eligible for a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2) only if his Sentencing Guidelines range has been lowered by the Sentencing
Commission. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Because Specyalski did not establish that he is eligible for relief un der that crite rion , the court did not abuse its discretion in denying his
motion. See United States v. Martin , 916 F.3d 389, 395 (4th Cir. 2019). Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s judgment

. United States v. Specyalski , No. 6:16

- cr
- 00774

- BHH

1 (D.S.C. June 4, 2019)

. We deny Specyalski’s motion for a remedy. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisio nal process.
AFFIRMED
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00 915
- CV

Mohammad Q Mahmood , Appellant

v. Inamur Rahman, Sabiha Rahman, John Ward , and Susan Ward , Appellee s

FROM THE COUNTY COUR T AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNT Y NO. 16
- 0124
- CPSC1 , THE HONORABLE JOHN M CMASTER , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Mohammad Q Mahmood, acting p ro se, filed thre e notic e s of appeal in
December 2019 , purporting to appeal from a p rotective order entered by a court in Illinois, a judg ment sig ned in March 2018, and a judgment or order that was signed on December 9, 2019

.

On January 17, 2020 , the Clerk of this Court advised appella nt that it appears that this Court lacks jurisdiction over this matter because : (i) a protective order entered by a court in
Illinois is outside this Court ’ s dist rict boundar ies, see Tex. Gov ’ t Code § § 22.201(d) ( listing counties that compose Third Court of Ap pe als District ), .220 (stating that court of appe als has appellate jurisdiction of civil cases within distric t ) ; (ii) the notice of appeal purporting to appeal
from a judgment that was signed in March 2018 was untimely, see Tex. R. App. P. 26.1 (stat ing deadlines for filing notice of appeal in civil cases) ; and (iii) the clerk ’ s re cord does n ot contain a judgment or order that was signed on December 9, 2019 , s ee L ehman n v. Har

- Con Corp. ,2

39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (explaining that “ ge neral rule , with a few mostly statutory exceptions , is that an appeal m ay be taken only from a final judgment ” ) ; McKinnon v. Wal l in , No. 03

- 18

- 00612

- CV, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 552, at * 4 (Tex. App.

— Austin Jan. 30, 2019, no pet.) ( mem. op.) ( dismissing appeal because appellant failed to identify final judgment or
appe alab le order that would support court ’ s ju risdiction)

. The Cl er k re q uested that a ppellant file a response by January 27, 2020 , explaining how this Court may exer cise jurisdiction over this appeal and advised him that the failure to do so would result in the dism issal of this appeal. See
Te x. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

To dat e , a ppella nt has not responded to this Court ’ s letter , and no supp lem ental
clerk ’ s record has been filed that co ntains a final ju dgment or other appe a la ble order to support
this Court ’ s jurisdiction

. Because appellant has failed to demonstrate this Court ’ s jurisdiction over this appeal , we dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. See id

.

__________________________________________ Melissa Good wi n , Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly , and Smith
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdictio n Fil ed: February 5, 2020
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS

The undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of Valley Financial Corporation,
certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).

Dated: August 10, 2007



/s/ Kimberly B. SnyderChief Financial Officer




44
(logo) Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

 

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") dated as of June 1,2014 by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation asDepositor, KeyBank National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association asTrustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator,Paying Agent and Custodian and Situs Holdings, LLC as Operating Advisorrelating to the Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, COMM2014-CCRE18 Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates **(COMM2014-CCRE18)** 

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the"Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performanceof such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement areperformed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicing activities andperformance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2018 toDecember 31, 2018 (the "Reporting Period") in accordance with thePooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theterms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for theReporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and statusthereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, ManagingDirector 

 

Date: March 1, 2019
#### Darris KITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D09-5202.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 30, 2011.

Darris Kitt, South Bay, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying postconviction relief as to ground one of appellant’s motion, in that in its trial response the state conceded a need for an evidentiary hearing for the proper resolution of appellant’s claim that his attorney never advised him of a plea offer. As to the remaining grounds, we affirm.

*Reversed and remanded for an eviden-tiary hearing.*

GROSS, C.J., WARNER and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
POWER OF ATTORNEY                     Exhibit (24)


We, the undersigned  directors of HSB Group, Inc., hereby  individually  appoint
Robert C.  Walker and Roberta A.  O'Brien,  and each of them  singly,  with full
power of substitution to each, our true and lawful  attorneys with full power to
them and each of them  singly,  to sign  for us in our  names in the  capacities
stated below the Form 10-K Annual Report, pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 for
HSB Group,  Inc., and any and all amendments to said Form 10-K, and generally to
do all such things in our name and on our behalf in our  capacities as directors
that will  enable the Company to comply with the  provisions  of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and all  requirements  of the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission,  which  relate to said Form 10-K and the  filing  thereof,
hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said
attorneys  or any  one of  them to said  Form  10-K  and any and all  amendments
thereto.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, this Power
of Attorney has been signed by the following  persons in the  capacities  and on
the date indicated.

(Signature)                         (Title)                    (Date)



/s/ Gordon W. Kreh             President, Chief               February 22, 1999
Gordon W. Kreh                 Executive Officer
                                 and Director

/s/ Joel B. Alvord
Joel B. Alvord                      Director                  February 22, 1999


/s/ Richard H. Booth
Richard H. Booth                    Director                  February 22, 1999


/s/ Colin G. Campbell
Colin G. Campbell                   Director                  February 22, 1999


/s/ Richard G. Dooley
Richard G. Dooley                   Director                  February 22, 1999

                                       97
<PAGE>


   (Signature)                      (Title)                        (Date)


/s/ William B. Ellis
William B. Ellis                    Director                  February 22, 1999


/s/ E. James Ferland
E. James Ferland                    Director                  February 22, 1999


/s/ Henrietta Holsman Fore
Henrietta Holsman Fore              Director                  February 22, 1999


/s/ Simon W. Leathes
Simon W. Leathes                    Director                  February 22, 1999


/s/ Lois Dickson Rice
Lois Dickson Rice                   Director                  February 22, 1999



                                       98
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ADVANCED
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,615
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,795
<ALLOWANCES>                                       961
<INVENTORY>                                        932
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,277
<PP&E>                                          17,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,265
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,082
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           115
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,779
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   143,202
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               218,252
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  201,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,893
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,514
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,983
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,402
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,581
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,581
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

               Letter Re: unaudited interim financial information

The Board of Directors
Northfield Laboratories Inc.:

With respect to the registration statements (Nos. 333-15877, 333-51681,
333-79579, 333-102672, 333-110110 and 333-128787) on Form S-8 and the
registration statements (No. 333-106615, 333-115459 and 333-121622) on Form S-3
of Northfield Laboratories Inc., we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein
of our report dated October 7, 2005 related to our review of interim financial
information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered to be a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
independent registered public accounting firm or a report prepared or certified
by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of
sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

Very truly yours,


/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
October 7, 2005
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re O .O. and A

. G

. , Relator s

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 5

- 0 0430

- C V

Trial court case number: 20 1 5

- 02 3 30J

Trial court: 3 14 th Juvenile District Court of H a rri s County

On May 7 , 201 5 , relator s
, O .O. and A

. G

. , filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to vacate the respondent trial court’s April 28, 2015 temporary order following adversary hearing . This temporary order appointed the real party in interest, Department of Family and Protective Services (“DFPS”), as temporary managing conservator of the

relators’ child, A.G., and limited relators’ access to and possession o f the chil d to twice a

week in the above

- referenced trial cause number in a suit affecting the parent

- child relationship

. Also o n May 7, 2015, relators filed an emergency motion for a stay of all trial court orders affecting custody and access to the child, A.G., u ntil this Court resolves their petition for a writ of mandamus.

Accordingly, we grant the motion , in part, and ORDER that the portion of the trial court’s April 28, 2015 temporary order

, to the extent that i t limit s relators’ visitation with

and access to the child, A.G., is stayed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10(b). This stay is

effective until the mandamus petition is finally decided or th is Court otherwise orders the stay lifted. See id. Any party may mo ve for reconsideration of the stay. See id. at 52.10(c).

Further, t he Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus by the real party in interest DFPS

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52. 8(b)(1)

. The response, if any, shall be

filed within 7 days from the date of this order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2, 52.4

.
It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evel yn Keyes

x Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 8, 2015
Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 20-F of Ciba Specialty Chemicals Holding Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Switzerland (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1.) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                                              
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 15, 2007 |  | /S/    ARMIN
MEYER                                           
|                        |  | Armin Meyer Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Date: February 15, 2007 |  | /S/    MICHAEL
JACOBI                                        
|                        |  | Michael Jacobi Chief
Financial Officer
#### Laurent DORIVERT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D09-1906.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 29, 2011.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Ailene S. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Laurent Dorivert timely appeals a jury verdict convicting him of the first-degree murder of his wife, Marie Dorivert. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal in *1209this circumstantial evidence case. We have carefully considered the evidence presented at trial in light of the standard applicable in circumstantial evidence cases. *See, e.g., McArthur v. State,*351 So.2d 972, 976 (Fla.1977). More specifically, we find that the eye witness testimony placing Do-rivert at the scene of the murder in the narrow time frame during which the murder occurred, along, with the blood and DNA evidence linking Dorivert to the murder scene were sufficient to rebut Do-rivert’s proffered hypothesis of innocence — that he was running errands and nowhere near the crime scene during or after the murder, so that someone else must have committed the crime.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, LAWSON, and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.07

          Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
            pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Spectrum Organic Products,
Inc. ("the Company") for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Neil G.
Blomquist, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   the information contained in the Report presents fairly, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                            /s/  Neil G. Blomquist
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Neil G. Blomquist
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 March 10, 2003
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Arthur D. TAYLOR, Jr.

No. 2011-K-2746.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 2012.

In re Taylor Jr., Arthur D.; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 477374; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KA 0592.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7243 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7243

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend Public Law 115-217 to change the address of the postal 
facility designated by such Public Law in honor of Sergeant First Class 
             Alwyn Crendall Cashe, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO CHANGE ADDRESS OF POSTAL FACILITY DESIGNATED BY 
              PUBLIC LAW 115-217.

    In section 1(a) of Public Law 115-217, strike ``567 East Franklin 
Street'' and insert ``83 Geneva Drive''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 7243

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To amend Public Law 115-217 to change the address of the postal 
facility designated by such Public Law in honor of Sergeant First Class 
             Alwyn Crendall Cashe, and for other purposes.
```