alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
865 A.2d 658

#### IN THE MATTER OF LARRY J. MCCLURE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 267521971).

January 28, 2005.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-301, concluding that LARRY J. McCLURE, formerly of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, and who has been suspended from the practice of law since May 21, 2003, by Orders of the Court filed on April 25, 2003, and June 3, 2004, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year for violating *RPC*8.1(b)(failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), *RPC*8.4(d)(conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and failure to file the affidavit required by *Rule*1:20-20;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that prior to reinstatement to practice, respondent should be required to provide proof of his fitness to practice law;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LARRY J. McCLURE is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent remain suspended from practice until the conclusion of all ethics matters pending against him; and it is further

ORDERED that prior to reinstatement to practice, respondent shall provide proof of his fitness to practice law as attested to by a mental health professional approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and *313that respondent continue to comply with *Rule*1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*l:20-20(c), respondent’s failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of *Rule*l:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent’s petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of *RPC*8.1(b) and *RPC*8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to *Rule*1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1676 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  Union Calendar No. 62
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1676

                          [Report No. 110-102]

   To reauthorize the program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
          Development for loan guarantees for Indian housing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2007

Mr. Boren (for himself, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Renzi, and Mr. 
   Kildee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

                             April 20, 2007

Additional sponsors: Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. Meeks of New York, Mr. Kennedy, 
  Ms. Herseth Sandlin, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. Baca, and Mr. Grijalva

                             April 20, 2007

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To reauthorize the program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
          Development for loan guarantees for Indian housing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Native American Home Ownership 
Opportunity Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. LOAN GUARANTEES FOR NATIVE AMERICAN HOUSING.

    Section 184(i) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 
(12 U.S.C. 1715z-13a(i)) is amended as follows:
            (1) Outstanding aggregate limitation.--In paragraph (5)(C), 
        by striking ``fiscal years 1997 through 2007'' and inserting 
        ``fiscal years 2008 through 2012''.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--In paragraph (7), by 
        striking ``fiscal years 1997 through 2007'' and inserting 
        ``fiscal years 2008 through 2012''.
                                                  Union Calendar No. 62

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1676

                          [Report No. 110-102]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To reauthorize the program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
          Development for loan guarantees for Indian housing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 20, 2007

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
S97Y0013.

#### IN THE MATTER OF HUGH DONNETT HARPER.

(485 SE2d 33)

Per curiam.

Hugh Donnett Harper seeks reinstatement to the practice of law. We agree with the review panel’s recommendation and order that Harper be reinstated.

This Court accepted Harper’s petition for voluntary discipline, based on his conviction as an habitual offender and his acknowledgment of alcohol abuse. *In the Matter of Harper,*265 Ga. 768 (462 SE2d 604) (1995). This Court suspended Harper for a minimum of six months and conditioned his reinstatement on his petition to the review panel of the State Disciplinary Board following his obtaining: (1) certification from the Committee on Lawyer Impairment (now the Lawyer Assistance Program), that based on the Program members’ observations, and, in accordance with the rules set forth in the Bar *589Rules, Harper did not manifest symptoms of any condition which mentally or physically impaired his competency as an attorney or posed a substantial threat to himself or others; and (2) certification from the Office of General Counsel for the State Bar that it had reviewed its disciplinary records maintained from the date of this Court’s order, and determined that Harper has not demonstrated any conduct or manifested symptoms of any condition that indicated he posed a danger to his clients and the public by his return to the practice of law.

Decided March 3, 1997.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, E. Duane Cooper, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

Harper has obtained the two certifications this Court required for his reinstatement. Additionally, he has acknowledged his problem of alcohol abuse, and states he continues, and will continue to obtain treatment for his condition. He also shows that although his conduct violated professional standards, he did not harm any client, or receive any complaint from another attorney.

We agree with the review panel that Harper has met the conditions for reinstatement, and order that he be reinstated.

*Reinstated.*

*All the Justices concur, except Hunstein, J, who dissents; Thompson, J., not participating.*
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7188 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7188

 To extend by two years the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards 
Program of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 2018

 Mr. Ratcliffe (for himself, Mr. Richmond, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Thompson of 
   Mississippi, Mr. Walden, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Shimkus, and Mr. Tonko) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
   Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend by two years the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards 
Program of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism 
Standards Program Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CHEMICAL FACILITY ANTI-TERRORISM STANDARDS PROGRAM 
              OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.

    Section 5 of the Protecting and Securing Chemical Facilities from 
Terrorist Attacks Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-254; 6 U.S.C. 621 note) 
is amended by striking ``4 years'' and inserting ``6 years''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             12,425
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     116,890
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (2,902)
<INVENTORY>                                        34,085
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  166,285
<PP&E>                                            375,993
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (72,254)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    681,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              98,388
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              130
<OTHER-SE>                                        273,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      681,800
<SALES>                                           173,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  173,486
<CGS>                                             124,058
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     124,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   31,123
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  4,911
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    13,394
<INCOME-TAX>                                        5,358
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 8,036
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        8,036
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .59


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATIONS





The undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of Valley Financial Corporation, certifies that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).





Dated:  May 13, 2010 /s/ Kimberly B. Snyder


Chief Financial Officer





37
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merix Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Mark R. Hollinger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|
|

|                    |  |  |  |                                          
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  |                                          
|                    |  | 
|Dated April 8, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    Mark R. Hollinger                 
|                    |  |  |  |                                          
|                    |  |  |  | Mark R. Hollinger Chief Executive
Officer
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors andshareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the"Company"), a subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loanoutsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial taxservice provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2016 and forthe year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii),1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii)and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicableservicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicingactivities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errorsthat may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may haveaffected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which theCompany served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

 

February 6, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas TX 75201-2997*

*T: 214-746-6500, F:214-712-6660,*www.pwc.com
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-923-1310-FI; WYW159733]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from Sun Cal Energy Inc. for competitive oil and gas lease WYW159733 for land in Sublette County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Julie L. Weaver, Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the BLM is proposing to reinstate lease WYW159733 effective February 1, 2008, under the original terms and conditions of the lease along with the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. The BLM has not issued a valid lease to any other interest affecting the lands.                

Julie L. Weaver,

Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication. 

[FR Doc. 2010-25356 Filed 10-6-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       9
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                             11,773
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                  0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                        0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                        0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                             0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            420,264
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              411,733
<LOANS>                                         1,207,574
<ALLOWANCE>                                         4,065
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,703,022
<DEPOSITS>                                      1,085,939
<SHORT-TERM>                                      111,375
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                24,445
<LONG-TERM>                                       366,701
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                               60
<OTHER-SE>                                        114,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  1,703,022
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    22,734
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   7,259
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                       27
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   30,020
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 13,501
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 21,063
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                               8,957
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                         125
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                      0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                     5,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     4,684
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          3,033
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        3,033
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       7.25
<LOANS-NON>                                         2,091
<LOANS-PAST>                                            0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                        0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                       888
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    4,076
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                         136
<RECOVERIES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   4,065
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                4,065
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                 0


</TABLE>
#### John Michael KOPS v. Gary A. LEE, et al.

No. 2011-CC-0808.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re Futrell, John M.; Kops, Lee, Fut-rell *&*Perles L.L.P.; Lee, Futrell & Perles L.L.P.; Lee, Gary A. et al.; Perles, Richard M.; —Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. H, No. 97-20713; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-C-0021.

Denied.