alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesse Daniel ROBARDS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-7103.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 15, 2000.

Decided Jan. 4, 2001.

Jesse Daniel Robards, pro se. Banuma-thi Rangarajan, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Jessie D. Robards appeals from the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) motion, attacking on numerous grounds his conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3). For the following reasons, we vacate and remand for further proceedings.

Regarding Robards’ claim that his counsel was ineffective for failing to file a notice of appeal following his sentencing, the district found that Robards failed to show prejudice, citing *Hill v. Lockhart,*474 U.S. 52, 59, 106 S.Ct. 366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985), as authority for this position. This finding was erroneous, however, under this court’s decision in *United States v. Peak,*992 F.2d 39, 42 (4th Cir.1993). In *Peak,*we held that counsel’s failure to pursue an appeal requested by a defendant constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel regardless of the likelihood of success on the merits. *Id.*Thus, if counsel promises to note an appeal and then fails to do so, petitioner is entitled to relief in the form of *111a belated appeal. *Id; see also Roe v. Flores-Ortega,*528 U.S. 470, 120 S.Ct. 1029,145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000).

Accordingly, we grant a certificate of appealability and vacate the district court’s order and remand for compliance with this opinion and *Peak.*We decline to address any other claims on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*VACATED AND REMANDED.*
# Fourt **h Court of Appeals**

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 17, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00575

- CV

B&P DEVELOPMENT, LLC and Chad H. Foster Jr.,

Appellant s

v.

KNIGHTHAWK, LLC , Series G,

Appellee

From the 83rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No . 29842

Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The reporter’s record was due October 23, 2015. On October 30, 2015, the court

reporter filed a notification of late record stating that her other duties preclude her from working

on the record and that she has not yet made arrangements for payment of the record with

appellants’ counsel. She asked the we grant her an extension of time to complete the record until

February 29, 2016

– a total of 129 days from the original due date. We granted the request in

part, and denied it in part, ordering the reporter to file the record on or before February 22, 2016

– 120 days from the or iginal due date.

On November 16, 2015, appellee filed a motion to reconsider our order, pointing out that

rule 35.3(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure restricts this court from granting

extension of more than thirty days at a time. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Accordingly, we

GRANT appellee’s motion to reconsider and ORDER our November 9, 2015 order withdrawn.

As before, we GRANT the court reporter’s request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s

record in part, but DENY it in part. We now ORDER the court reporter to file the reporter’s

record on or before November 23, 2015, thirty days from the original due date, based upon the

restriction set forth in rule 35.3(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. We advise the

court reporter that additional notifications of late record may be filed, but each notification

should request no more than an additional thirty days

.We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the court repor ter and all

counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of November, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24783]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center For Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, October 19, 2010, 11 a.m. to 
October 19, 2010, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the Federal Register 
on September 17, 2010, 75 FR 57042-57043.
    The meeting will be two days--October 18, 2010, from 8 a.m. to 
October 19, 2010, 5 p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The 
meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: September 28, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-24783 Filed 10-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1169-E1170]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             BISHOP STUDENT EXCELS IN NATIONAL HISTORY DAY

                                 ______

                            HON. JERRY LEWIS

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, June 7, 1995
  Mr. LEWIS of California. Mr. Speaker, I would like to bring to your 
attention today the fine achievement of Will Baylies and the leadership 
of his teacher, Mrs. Irene Sorenson, from Home Street Middle School in 
Bishop, CA. Recently, this remarkable student joined other students 
from across the country at the University of Maryland to compete in 
National History Day sponsored by the Constitutional Rights Foundation. 
The theme for this year's competition was ``Conflict and Compromise in 
History.''
  Will qualified for the national competition by first winning at the 
local, regional, and State levels. Will placed first in California for 
his research paper titled, ``A Philosophical Conflict on Civil Rights, 
Integration or Separatism? 
[[Page E1170]] Correspondence Between Martin Luther King, Jr. and 
Malcolm X.'' Will took took the original approach of creating a series 
of letters between these two men that express an understanding of their 
philosophies. In reality, King and Malcolm X did not correspond so the 
content of the letters reflect the research done as well as critical 
analysis by Will.
  This outstanding student and Mrs. Sorenson are a tribute to our 
public school system which remains the finest in the world. Although 
this student lives in a community of less than 5,000 people located 200 
miles from a major library or university, he completed extensive 
research in his subject area and was highly competitive with students 
from the large metropolitan area including Los Angeles County, San 
Bernardino County, and Riverside County. It is also remarkable that 
under the guidance of Mrs. Sorenson, a total of sixteen students made 
it all the way to the final State competition and exhibited their 
knowledge in seven of the possible eight categories.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask that you join me, our colleagues, and friends in 
recognizing the fine achievement of these individuals, Their work is a 
reflection of education at its best. It is fitting and appropriate that 
the House of Representatives pay tribute to them today.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer of NSTAR, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(i) | the enclosed Annual Report of NSTAR on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of NSTAR.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                                                             
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 16, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ JAMES J. JUDGE                                          
|                         |  |  |  | James J. Judge                                              
|                         |  |  |  | Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer
#### Colleen Comer MARCHAND, et al. v. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS, et al.

No. 2010-CC-1942.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Continental Insurance Company f/k/a; Fidelity Continental Insurance Co.; —Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. L, No. 09-8475; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-C-0650.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7120 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7120

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to extend through 
 2023 the authority of the Federal Election Commission to impose civil 
money penalties on the basis of a schedule of penalties established and 
                      published by the Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY AUTHORITY OF FEDERAL 
              ELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH 2023.

    (a) Extension of Authority.--Section 309(a)(4)(C)(v) of the Federal 
Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(4)(C)(v)) is amended 
by striking ``December 31, 2018'' and inserting ``December 31, 2023''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the earlier of--
            (1) December 31, 2018; or
            (2) the date of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 27, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 7120

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to extend through 
 2023 the authority of the Federal Election Commission to impose civil 
money penalties on the basis of a schedule of penalties established and 
                      published by the Commission.
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24951]



[[Page 61474]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-3049-000]


Champion Energy Services, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

September 28, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Champion Energy Services, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 18, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#93d5d6c1d0dcfdfffafdf6c0e6e3e3fce1e7d3f5f6e1f0bdf4fce5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eea8abbcada1808287808bbd9b9e9e819c9aae888b9c8dc0898198">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24951 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7187 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2018 

Received 

AN ACT 

To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until 

December 7, 2018. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 7187 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Flood Insur3 ance Program Further Extension Act of 2018’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROGRAM EXTENSION. 

5 (a) FINANCING.—Section 1309(a) of the National 

6 Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘November 30, 2018’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘December 7, 2018’’. 

9 (b) PROGRAM EXPIRATION.—Section 1319 of the Na10 tional Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is 

11 amended by striking ‘‘November 30, 2018’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘December 7, 2018’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at June 30, 2000 (unaudited) and Statements of Income for the
three months ended June 30, 2000 (unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         714,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,526,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                (1,258,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  6,355,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,974,000
<PP&E>                                       9,862,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (3,082,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,907,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,967,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,889,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,907,000
<SALES>                                     16,561,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,561,000
<CGS>                                       12,055,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,055,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,812,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                705,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   274,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            431,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   431,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08




</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7176 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reestablish the 15 percent 

corporate rate bracket. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 27, 2018 

Mr. KING of Iowa (for himself and Mr. BLUM) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reestablish 

the 15 percent corporate rate bracket. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Economic 

5 Opportunities for Small Family C-Corporations’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REESTABLISHMENT OF 15 PERCENT CORPORATE 

7 RATE BRACKET. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 11(b) of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7176 IH

1 ‘‘(b) AMOUNT OF TAX.—The amount of tax imposed 

2 by subsection (a) shall be the sum of— 

3 ‘‘(1) 15 percent of so much of the taxable in4 come as does not exceed $50,000, and 

5 ‘‘(2) 21 percent of so much of the taxable in6 come as exceeds $50,000. 

7 In the case of a corporation which has taxable income in 

8 excess of $100,000 for any taxable year, the amount of 

9 tax determined under the preceding sentence for such tax10 able year shall be increased by the lesser of (A) 5 percent 

11 of such excess, or (B) $3,000.’’. 

12 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 11 of such 

13 Code is amended by adding at the end the following new 

14 subsection: 

15 ‘‘(e) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN REFERENCES.—Any 

16 reference in this title (or in any other provision of law) 

17 to the rate of tax imposed by this section shall be treated 

18 as a reference to the rate of tax specified in subsection 

19 (b)(2) unless such reference clearly indicates otherwise.’’. 

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

21 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

22 December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Ricky L. BROWN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-1683.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 28, 2011.

Ricky L. Brown, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(4)(B).

WOLF, THOMAS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
#### RFP, INC. v. MORGAN BUILDINGS & SPAS, INC.

No. 2010-CC-1824.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 29, 2010.

In re Morgan Buildings & Spas Inc.; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Martin, 16th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 76238-A; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 10-00621.

Denied.
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884-2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

270 Park Avenue, 

New York, NY 10017

 

RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator for the Gumberg Retail Portfolio Whole Loan (in such capacities, “Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the “reporting period”):

 

 

(a)      A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the “Servicing Agreement(s)”) has been made under my supervision; and

 

(b)     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.

 

 

 

March 19, 2015

 

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

Brian Smith

Vice President

 

 

 

 

 

To:  J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

 

Schedule A

 

 

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

 

 

1.        Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2014 by and among J.P. MORGAN CHASE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., as Depositor, KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and Trustee, and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor relating to the Series JPMCC 2014-C19 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, relating to the Gumberg Retail Portfolio Whole Loan, a pari passu portion of which is included in the Series JPMCC 2014-C20 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction.

 

 

 

 

To:  J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

Schedule B

 

 

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

 

Not Applicable