alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Proposed subsequent arrangement.

# SUMMARY:

This notice is being issued under the authority of Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160). The Department is providing notice of a proposed subsequent arrangement under the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy Between the Government of the United States and the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) and the Agreement for Cooperation Between the United States and Japan Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy.

This subsequent arrangement concerns the retransfer of 573 g of U.S.-origin uranium (2 g U-235) and 10 g of plutonium, contained in 50 irradiated fuel rod segments, from Studsvik Nuclear AB, Nyköping, Sweden, to the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), Tokai-Mura, Japan. The material, which is currently located at Studsvik, will be transferred to the JAEA Research Reactor for ramp test and post-irradiation examination. These rod segments have been irradiated in various European power plants under project ALPSII, and collected and prepared by the Hot Cell Laboratory at Studsvik. Upon completion of the analysis, the material will remain in Japan.

In accordance with Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement will not be inimical to the common defense and security.

This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than October 22, 2010.

Dated: October 1, 2010.

For the Department of Energy.

Thomas P. D'Agostino,

Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-25307 Filed 10-6-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 5887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2522]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 73

[Docket No. FDA-2007-C-0044] (formerly Docket No. 2007C-0474)


Listing of Color Additives Exempt From Certification; Astaxanthin 
Dimethyldisuccinate; Confirmation of Effective Date

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is confirming the 
effective date of December 8, 2009, for the final rule that appeared in 
the Federal Register of November 5, 2009. The final rule amended the 
color additive regulations to provide for the safe use of astaxanthin 
dimethyldisuccinate as a color additive in the feed of salmonid fish to 
enhance the color of their flesh.

DATES:  The effective date for the final rule published in the Federal 
Register of November 5, 2009 (74 FR 57248) is confirmed as December 8, 
2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Felicia M. Ellison, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-265), Food and Drug Administration, 
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 301-436-1264.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of November 5, 2009 
(74 FR 57248), FDA amended the color additive regulations to add Sec.  
73.37 (21 CFR 73.37) to provide for the safe use of astaxanthin 
dimethyldisuccinate as a color additive in the feed of salmonid fish to 
enhance the color of their flesh.
    FDA gave interested persons until December 7, 2009, to file 
objections or requests for a hearing. The agency received no objections 
or requests for a hearing on the final rule. Therefore, FDA finds that 
the effective date of the final rule that published in the Federal 
Register of November 5, 2009, should be confirmed.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 73

    Color additives, Cosmetics, Drugs, Medical devices.

0
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
321, 341, 342, 343, 348, 351, 352, 355, 361, 362, 371, 379e) and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and 
redelegated to the Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, notice is 
given that no objections or requests for a hearing were filed in 
response to the November 5, 2009, final rule. Accordingly, the 
amendments issued thereby became effective December 8, 2009.

    Dated: January 22, 2010.
Mitchell A. Cheeseman,
Acting Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 2010-2522 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT Plumtree Software GmbH
    
    SwitzerlandPlumtree Software Singapore PTE Limited
    
    SingaporePlumtree Software Australia PTY Limited
    
    AustraliaPlumtree Software Limited
    
    Hong KongPlumtree Software Korea Limited
    
    KoreaPlumtree Portal Software Limited
    
    United KingdomPlumtree Software AB
    
    SwedenPlumtree Software Deutschland GmbH
    
    GermanyPlumtree Software EURL
    
    FrancePlumtree Software BV
    
    NetherlandsPlumtree Software Japan KK
    
    JapanPlumtree Software Canada Limited
    
    Canada
#### Allen WALKER, et al v. SUPER 8 MOTELS, INC.

No. 2010-CC-2184.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Walker, Allen et al.; Walker, Roxanne; —Plaintiff(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. J, No. 04-8545; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-C-0593.

Denied.
862 A.2d 55

#### CITY OF EAST ORANGE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BLOCK 52, LOT 31, ETC., SCHEDULE NO. 7, BLOCK 62-14, 111 NORTH 17TH STREET ASSESSED TO SUSAN KYNOR, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

November 10, 2004.

Denied.
A93A0842.

#### BALKCOM v. THE STATE.

(430 SE2d 851)

Johnson, Judge.

Charles M. Balkcom, Jr. was tried and convicted of robbery and aggravated battery. In his sole enumeration of error, Balkcom claims that the trial court erred in allowing the state to attempt to impeach a witness for the defense by asking about criminal proceedings against two of her brothers, in order to show bias against the state. He has cited no authority in support of his position. “As a general rule, and particularly when the evidence is conflicting, a party may show any fact or circumstance that might affect the credit of an opposing witness. And on cross-examination it is always permissible to sift the motives of the witness and to show, if possible, any reason other than a purpose to tell the truth which may consciously or un*480consciously actuate him in his testimony.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) *Arnold v. State,*163 Ga. App. 10, 13 (4) (293 SE2d 501). (1982). This enumeration of error is without merit.

Decided April 13, 1993.

*L. A. Browne, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Joseph H. Briley, District Attorney,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Blackburn, J., and Senior Appellate Judge John W. Sognier concur.*
(logo)CWCapital

ASSETMANAGEMENT

** **

** **

**Annual Statement asto Compliance**

**For the Period ofJanuary 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017**

 

 

**WFRBS 2014-C21**

 

 

Inaccordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB and****with the requirements detailedin §11.12 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for theabove-mentioned CMBS pool, (the “CMBS Pool”), CWCapital Asset Management LLC(“CWCAM”), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officer’sCertificate with respect to the following:

 

(A)      a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar year or portionthereof (the “Reporting Period”) and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreementhas been made under such officer’s supervision and; 

 

(B)      to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

Should you have any questions, please donot hesitate to contact us. 

 

 

Sincerely,

CWCapitalAsset Management LLC

 

/s/David B. Iannarone

DavidB. Iannarone

President

 

 

7501Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 500 West, Bethesda, MD 20814

www.cwcapital.com
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 27, 2017

p0619 

# Order

Clerk June 27, 2017

154443

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154443

COA: 325107

Wayne CC: 14

- 002709

- FC

DANTRAZ JAVON OLIVER

- McCLUNG,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 21, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            REPORT OF GRANT THORNTON
<PAGE>

                         [Letterhead of Grant Thornton]

               Report Of Independent Certified Public Accountants



Shareholders
Cimnet, Inc.

         We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Cimnet,
Inc. as of December 31, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.

         We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

         In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cimnet, Inc.
as of December 31, 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.

/s/Grant Thornton LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
January 22, 2001
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00064-CV

Richard ARCE,

Appellant

v.

Ken MCGOUGH and Jan McGough d/b/a K&M Auto Sales,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CVDV-16-0000444

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellees recover their costs of appeal from appellant. 

SIGNED September 26, 2018.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS



The
undersigned, as the chief executive officer of Valley Financial Corporation, certify that the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for
the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350(c).



Dated: November 14, 2003



|/s/ Ellis L. Gutshall  
|-----------------------
|Chief Executive Officer



46
#### Corey SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D11-858.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 4, 2011.

*1189Corey Smith, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SHEPHERD and EMAS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Clines v. State,*912 So.2d 550, 553 (Fla.2005) (holding to qualify as a habitual violent felony offender, a defendant must have been convicted of one prior enumerated felony); *Williams v. State,*898 So.2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (stating only one prior qualifying conviction is required to sentence a defendant as a habitual violent felony offender).
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS

I, William B. Cyr, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Freshpet, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2017; and

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 30, 2018

/s/ William B. Cyr              _

William B. Cyr

Chief Executive Officer
#### Stefan JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D10-650.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 24, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 5, 2011.

Stefan Johnson, Belle Glade, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant’s motion for return of property is affirmed for reasons other than those given by the trial court. Appellant’s motion was facially insufficient. *See Almeda v. State,*959 So.2d 806 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

*Affirmed.*

MAY, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
585 A.2d 370

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT COPELTON.

September 4, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

Calendar No. 307 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1722 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AUGUST 1, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 601 Banyan Trail in Boca Raton, Florida, 

as the ‘‘Leonard W. Herman Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LEONARD W. HERMAN POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 601 Banyan Trail in Boca 

6 Raton, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Leonard W. Herman Post Office’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1722 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Leonard W. Herman 

5 Post Office’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Calendar No. 307 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1722 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. Raton, Florida, as the ‘‘Leonard W. Herman al Service located at 601 Banyan Trail in Boca 

AUGUST 1, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### Donna BROCK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D11-423.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 18, 2011.

Donna M. Brock, Ocala, pro se.

Pamela J. Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence in case number 10-000130-CFMA, in the Circuit Court in and for St. Johns County, Florida. *See*Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

TORPY, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
#### Joel M. WEISSMAN, P.A., Petitioner, v. Arghavan Gabriela MOSTAFAVI, Respondent.

No. 4D11-1546.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 3, 2011.

Kristen Ann Terry and Joel M. Weiss-man of Joel M. Weissman, P.A., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Jennifer S. Carroll of the Law Offices of Jennifer S. Carroll, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Joel M. Weissman, P.A., seeks prohibition following the denial of its motion to disqualify the presiding judge in post-dissolution proceedings in which petitioner is pursuing a charging lien.

We conclude that the motion was legally sufficient.

Accordingly, we grant the petition and remand for reassignment to another circuit judge. We withhold formal issuance of the writ on the assumption that the presiding judge will proceed accordingly.

*Petition granted.*

STEVENSON, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-LC16

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 25, 2016

 

 

/s/ BRIAN SMITH

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,602
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         405,547
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           410,261
<LOANS>                                        999,459
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,814
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,475,509
<DEPOSITS>                                     971,295
<SHORT-TERM>                                    89,150
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             19,430
<LONG-TERM>                                    292,990
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,475,509
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 36,196
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               12,665
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                48,861
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              23,855
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,607
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,254
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,557
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,428
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,428
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.46
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,865
<LOANS-PAST>                                       345
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,432
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,077
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,622
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      108
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,814
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,814
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>