alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2014, by and among J.P.Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, ADivision of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust,National Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as SeniorTrust Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through CertificatesSeries 2014-C21 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ViewCast.com, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  August 14, 2009
    /s/  Laurie L. LathamLaurie L. LathamChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2

Certification

I, Hassan N. Natha, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Fisher Communications, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Dated: April 29, 2013



/s/ Hassan N. NathaHassan N. NathaSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer




1
exv10w12







Exhibit 10.12




AMENDMENT TO

STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS




     THIS AGREEMENT by Weatherford International Ltd. (the “Company”),



W I T N E S S E T H:




     WHEREAS, on September 8, 1998, July 5, 2000, and September 26, 2001, the Company entered into
stock option agreements (collectively, the “Agreements”) with certain directors;



     WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to amend the Agreements; and



     WHEREAS, the Company has determined to amend the Agreements to bring the Agreements into
documentary compliance with section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Company agrees that, effective January 1, 2009, the Agreements are hereby
amended by adding the following new Section:



     Compliance With Section 409A. The exercisability of the Option shall not be
extended to the extent that such extension would subject the holder to additional
taxes under section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed on the 31st day of
December, 2008.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Bernard J. Duroc-Danner	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	 

Bernard J. Duroc-Danner
	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Chairman, CEO and President
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2011 (the Report), which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
 
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such quarter and the results
of operations of the Registrant for such quarter.
  /s/ Deirdre Y. GillespieDeirdre Y. Gillespie, M.D.President and Chief Executive Officer
[Principal Executive Officer]/s/ Gail A. SloanGail A. SloanChief Financial Officer and Secretary
[Principal Financial Officer] Note:
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to La
Jolla Pharmaceutical Company and will be retained by La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. James L. HICKS.

No. 2011-KK-0819.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2011.

In re Hicks, James L.; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Natchitoches, 10th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. C-15142; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW 10-00999.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J., would grant.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
 I, David T. Stoner, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ViewCast.com, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   Date: August 14, 2008
    
    
    
    /s/ David T. Stoner

David T. StonerChief Executive Officer
#### In re Jamilla A. BYNOG.

No. 2009-OB-2609.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 6, 2011.

ORDER

Considering the “Request to Extend Conditional Admission” filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that the ODC’s request to extend the term of petitioner’s conditional admission be and hereby is denied. The probationary period imposed by this court in *In re: Bynog,*09-2609 (La.12/16/09), 23 So.3d 895, shall be terminated, as the court finds petitioner has substantially complied with all terms of probation.

/s/ Bernette J. Johnson /s/ Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

GUIDRY, J., would consider extending probation.
No. 13,508.

#### Vinson *v.*The Town of Monticello.

*Pleading.*— Qomplaini.—Ordinance.—Enactment.—Sufficiency *of Allegation as to.*— An allegation in a complaint, that an ordinance was enacted by the board of trustees of the town, is sufficient, as the trustees alone are authorized to enact ordinances.

Municipal Corporation. — *Intoxicating Liquor.*— *Sale, Barter or Giving Away of.*— Ordinance *Relating*Thereto.— *Validity of.*— An ordinance which prohibits the sale, barter or giving away of intoxicating liquor without a license, is valid. The substantive grant contained in the statute is the *104power to license, regulate and restrain the sale of intoxicating liquors, but as a necessary incident to this power is included the power to prohibit the bartering or giving away of intoxicating liquors.

From the White Circuit Court.

*A. W. Reynolds*and *E. B. Sellers,*for appellant.

Mitchell, J.

The town of Monticello instituted a suit against Vinson to recover a penalty prescribed by an ordinance alleged to have been enacted by “ the town, by its board of trustees,” on the 1st day of June, 1886, prohibiting any person from selling, bartering or giving away any intoxicating liquor in a less quantity than a quart, without first procuring a license from the proper municipal authority.

For the appellant it is now contended that the court erred in overruling a demurrer to the complaint. It is said it does not appear with sufficient certainty what officers of the town enacted the by-law or ordinance. The suggestion is altogether without force. It is averred that the ordinance was enacted by the board of trustees, and, as the trustees alone are authorized' to enact ordinances, it follows that the averment is certain and definite. *Hardenbrook*v. *Town of Ligonier,*95 Ind. 70. Lastly, it is said the ordinance is void because it assumes to prohibit the sale, barter or giving away of intoxicating liquor without a license, .while the statute only authorizes towns to license, regulate and restrain the *sale*of spirituous, vinous, malt and other intoxicating liquors within the corporation. The substantive grant contained in the statute is the power to license, regulate and restrain the sale of intoxicating liquor, but as a necessary incident to the power to restrain and regulate the sale, and to prevent the evasion of any ordinance against selling without license, is included the power to prohibit the bartering or giving away of any intoxicating liquor. *State*v. *Adamson,*14 Ind. *296; Williams*v. *State,*48 Ind. 306. This is upon the principle that a grant carries with it by implication all that is neces*105■sary to make the power granted effectual. The ordinance is, therefore, valid as a whole.

Filed Jan. 26, 1889;

petition for a rehearing overruled March 26, 1889.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs, and five per cent, ■damages.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 1519

SAUNDRA TAYLOR

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, LLC; MGM NATIONAL HARBOR CASINO; STEVEN MANNING

,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

JOHN DOE,

Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow

, Senior District Judge. ( 8:21

- cv

- 03192

- DKC )

Submitted : July 25 , 2023 Decided: July 28, 2023

Before WYNN and HEYTENS

, Circuit Judges , and FLOYD , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1519 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 32 Saundra Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Jeremy Steven Schneider, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1519 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM:

Saundra Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion to

reconsider the court’s prior order granting in part and denying in part her motion for leave

to amend her ci vil complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed.

R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The

order Taylor seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts a nd legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1519 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/28/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
#### Miralda MORRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN’S AFFAIRS and Division of Risk Management, Appellees.

No. 1D10-3697.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 8, 2011.

Katherine Stone Agliano of Barbas, Nunez, Sanders, Butler & Hovsepian, Tampa, for Appellant.

Jeffrey J. Kerley and Nicolette E. Tsambis of Rissman, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue *&*McLain, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation appeal, the claimant asks this Court to reverse a final order denying temporary partial disability (“TPD”) benefits. She argues the denial is not based on competent, substantial evidence. Although the claimant was under intermittent work restrictions from December 2008 to March 2009, neither of her treating physicians opined that the workplace injury led to the need for restrictions. The claimant’s first doctor testified unequivocally that the work restriction he imposed did not result from the compensable injury. And the judge of compensation claims (“JCC”) discounted the testimony of the claimant’s second doctor who equivocated as to the need for restrictions and who considered it reasonable to “backdate” the work restrictions to the date of injury. *See City of West Palm Beach Fire Dep’t v. Norman,*711 So.2d 628, 629 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (JCC can accept testimony of one physician over another). We therefore affirm the denial of TPD benefits because the claimant did not carry her burden to prove her compensa-ble workplace injury required work restrictions from the date of accident to the date of maximum medical improvement. *See*§ 440.15(4), Fla. Stat. (2007). We further remind the workers’ compensation community that although we normally review a JCC’s order to determine whether competent, substantial evidence supports it, “[a] decision in favor of the party *without*the burden of proof *need not be supported by competent, substantial evidence.” Fitzgerald v. Osceola County Sch. Bd.,*974 So.2d 1161, 1164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (citing *Mitchell v. XO Commc’ns,*966 So.2d 489, 490 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (emphasis added)).

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, C.J., CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ViewCast.com, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: August 14, 2009
    /s/  David T. StonerDavid T. StonerChief Executive Officer
V 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7135 

To direct the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is 

operating to issue a certificate of documentation with a coastwise endorsement for the vessel Pacific Provider. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2018 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the department in which the 

Coast Guard is operating to issue a certificate of documentation with a coastwise endorsement for the vessel 

Pacific Provider. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION FOR VES4 SEL ‘‘PACIFIC PROVIDER’’. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sections 12112 

6 and 12132 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary 

7 of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating 

8 may issue a certificate of documentation with a coastwise 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7135 IH

1 endorsement for the vessel Pacific Provider (United States 

2 official number 597967). 

3 (b) TERMINATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF CERTIFI4 CATE.—A certificate of documentation issued under sub5 section (a) shall expire on the date of the sale of the vessel 

6 or the entity that owns the vessel. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Lawrence J. BLAIR, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-3473.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 13, 2010.

Lawrence J. Blair, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

’ DISMISSED. *Baker v. State,*878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).

WOLF, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7266 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7266

 To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to consider the 
 Margaret R. Pardee Memorial Hospital as a covered entity for purposes 
                   of the 340B drug discount program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2018

 Mr. Meadows introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to consider the 
 Margaret R. Pardee Memorial Hospital as a covered entity for purposes 
                   of the 340B drug discount program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF MARGARET R. PARDEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AS 
              COVERED ENTITY FOR PURPOSES OF 340B DRUG DISCOUNT 
              PROGRAM.

    Notwithstanding the definition of a ``covered entity'' under 
paragraph (4) of section 340B(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 256b(a)), the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
consider the Margaret R. Pardee Memorial Hospital located in 
Hendersonville, North Carolina, as a covered entity under such 
paragraph for purposes of allowing the Margaret R. Pardee Memorial 
Hospital to participate in the drug discount program under such section 
340B.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MITY Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Bradley T Nielson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date: January 28, 2005                  /s/ Bradley T Nielson
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Bradley T Nielson
                                        Chief Executive Officer
645 A.2d 135

#### WARREN GIDNEY v. TOWNSHIP OF PENNSAUKEN, ET AL. AND DENNIS WIXTED.

June 30, 1994.

ORDER

Leave to appeal is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for its consideration on the merits.