alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Judge, U.S. Court of International Trade, sitting by

designation.

**Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

No. 00-30797

___________________________

HARRY MENDOZA; ET AL,

Plaintiffs,

HARRY MENDOZA; NORVEL ORAZIO,

Plaintiffs-Appellees.

VERSUS

THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS; ET AL,

THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS,

Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

98-CV-2868-J

 ___________________________________________________

January 5, 2001

Before JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI*, Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

Appellants challenge the district court’s interpretation of

the consent decree at issue in this case. For the reasons stated

by the district court in its order of May 31, 2000, we agree with
2

the district court’s interpretation of the consent decree and

AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. Appellee’s motions0 to

supplement the record, to strike a portion of the brief, and to

strike the record are hereby DENIED.

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Anyone requiring information regarding the ACCV should contact Annie Herzog, DVIC, HSB, HRSA, Room 11C-26, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; telephone (301) 443-6593 or e-mail:                         *aherzog@hrsa.gov*.                    

Dated: September 27, 2010.

Sahira Rafiullah,

Director, Division of Policy and Information Coordination.

[FR Doc. 2010-25115 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
#### Henry Leon SARPY, et al. v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, et al.

No. 2011-CC-0878.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2011.

In re Extex Production Inc.; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 71,789; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 10-C-1079,10-C-1084.

Denied.
**EXHIBIT 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the reference to our firm in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to theTm Bioscience Corporation Share Option Plan and to the incorporation by reference therein of ourreports dated March 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statementsof Luminex Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,2005, Luminex Corporation management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of LuminexCorporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.****
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1998
<CASH>                                             218
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,139
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,160
<PP&E>                                          16,001
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,540
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,674
<SALES>                                        292,605
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               292,605
<CGS>                                          260,643
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  260,643
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,034 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,881
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,467
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,414
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,414
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24890]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than October 18, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Clifford Stanford, Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Camp QFP, L.L.L.P., Atlanta, Georgia, and its general partners, 
Mary L. Camp and Lovell E. Camp, both of Atlanta, Georgia; to acquire 
outstanding voting shares of FMCB Holdings, Inc., and its subsidiary, 
First Choice Community Bank, both of Dallas, Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 29, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-24890 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2014-LC15 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

March 1, 2016

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### Mary Therese CHARLES, Appellant, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., Appellee.

No. 3D10-3198.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 27, 2011.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 26, 2011.

James Jean-Francois, for appellant.

Berman Rennert Vogel & Mandler and Thomas S. Ward, for appellee.

Before CORTIÑAS and LAGOA, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Tribeca Lending Corp. v. Real Estate Depot, Inc.,*42 So.3d 258 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jamal ALLEN.

No. 2010-KK-1016.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 7, 2010.

PER CURIAM.

|,In *State v. Waters,*00-0356 (La.3/12/01); 780 So.2d 1053, the defendant was lawfully stopped for a traffic violation. When the investigating officer determined the defendant had two prior felony arrests, he lawfully conducted a self-protective search of the vehicle’s interior for a firearm. While performing this search, he detected the distinct odor of marijuana. This Court found that the officer’s detection of that odor gave rise to probable cause to search the vehicle’s interior for contraband.

This logical extension of the plain view doctrine has been specifically adopted by name by numerous courts, including the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. *See, e.g., U.S. v. Pierre,*958 F.2d 1304, 1310 (5th Cir.1992) (en banc) (finding that a Border Patrol Agent who, at a non-border fixed 12checkpoint, leaned his head into the defendant’s driver side window and smelled freshly burned marijuana, acquired probable cause under the plain view (or plain smell exception) as to the existence of contraband within the vehicle and could search it as well as its contents.)

In the current case before this Court, both officers testified as to the odor of marijuana emanating from the defendant’s vehicle which they had lawfully stopped. Moreover, both officers observed the burnt ends of apparent marijuana cigarettes on the console of the vehicle. Probable cause to search the vehicle, under these facts, is indisputable.

The ruling of the trial court is reversed.

GUIDRY, J.,

concurs and assigns reasons.

| T During the commission of a lawful traffic stop, the officers observed partially burnt marijuana cigarettes that were in plain view on the vehicle’s center console. This observation, coupled with the officers’ immediate detection of a strong odor of marijuana emanating from the vehicle, provided sufficient probable cause for the search.
858 A.2d 608

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Mohamed ALAMGIR, Respondent

No. 966 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 28, 2004.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2004, there having been filed with this Court by Mohamed Alamgir his verified *685• Statement of Resignation dated August 16, 2004, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Mohamed Alamgir be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
COURT OF APPEALS

S E C O N D D I S T R I C T O F T E X A S

CHIEF JUSTICE

 BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICES

 ELIZABETH KERR

 J. WADE BIRDWELL

 DABNEY BASSEL

 DANA WOMACK

 MIKE WALLACH

 BRIAN WALKER

TIM CURRY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER

401 W. BELKNAP, SUITE 9000

FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76196-0211

TEL: (817) 884-1900

FAX: (817) 884-1932

www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa

CLERK 

 DEBRA SPISAK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

 LISA M. WEST

GENERAL COUNSEL

 CLARISSA HODGES

October 6, 2022

Criminal District Clerk, Tarrant County

Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center

401 W. Belknap, 3rd Floor

Fort Worth, TX 76196-0402

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Joseph W. Spence

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center

401 W. Belknap St.

Fort Worth, TX 76196-0201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. George William Gallagher

Judge, 396th District Court

Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center

401 W. Belknap, 6th floor

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Matthew Smid

Daniel, Moore, Evans, Biggs, Decker & 

Smid

301 Commerce St., Ste. 2001

Fort Worth, TX 76102-4129

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. David L. Evans

Regional Presiding Judge

Tom Vandergriff Civil Courts Building

100 N. Calhoun, 4th Floor

Fort Worth, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 02-21-00002-CR, 02-21-00003-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 1591282D, 1627542D

Style: Beecher Montgomery

v.

The State of Texas

Today the Second Court of Appeals issued an opinion and judgment in the 

above-referenced cause. Copies of the opinion and judgment are attached and can 

also be viewed on our Court’s webpage at: http://www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa.

FILE COPY
02-21-00002-CR

October 6, 2022

Page 2

Respectfully yours,

DEBRA SPISAK, CLERK

FILE COPY
#### William E. LEWIS, Jr., Appellant, v. THUNDERBIRD MANOR, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 2D09-4586.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 25, 2011.

Brenda Di Ioia of Brenda Di Ioia, P.A. Davie, for Appellant.

E. Mark Breed, III, of Breed & Nunnal-lee, P.A., Sebring, for Appellee.

LaROSE, Judge.

William E. Lewis, Jr., appeals a final judgment of foreclosure entered after a clerk’s default. Thunderbird Manor, Inc., sued him for unpaid assessments. We affirm the final judgment, in part, but write to address certain costs that Mr. Lewis challenges.

The trial court erred in awarding nontaxable costs of $16.41 for postage and $52 for photocopies. *In re Amendments to Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs,*915 So.2d 612, 616-17 (Fla.2005), does not list postage as a taxable cost. Therefore, we reverse the taxation of costs for postage.

Generally, copies, like postage, are part of the attorney’s nonrecoverable office expenses. *Griffith v. Griffith,*941 So.2d 1285, 1286 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (citing *Bolton v. Bolton,*412 So.2d 72, 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); *Mitchell v. Osceola Farms Co.,*574 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)); *Robbins v. McGrath,*955 So.2d 638, 635 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). The guidelines allow for taxation of copy costs for “documents filed with the court, which are reasonably necessary to assist the court in reaching a conclusion” and “costs of copies obtained in discovery.” *Guidelines,*915 So.2d at 616. The September 10, 2008, cost of $4.75 for copies of pleadings sent with a letter to Mr. Lewis are not taxable. We cannot determine from the record that the remaining copy costs are taxable. Counsel’s affidavit provides no explanation for December 16, 2008, copy costs of $3.50 and February 27, 2009, copy costs of $9.75. The January 30, 2009, listing of $2.75 and the May 29, 2009, listing of $31.25 also are unannotated. We note that the affidavit *1183identifies attorney’s fees for those dates, but the affidavit suggests no nexus to the copy costs.

Thunderbird had the burden to show that all requested costs were taxable. *See Guidelines,*915 So.2d at 616; *Nasser v. Nasser,*975 So.2d 581, 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). We reverse and remand for the trial court to deduct the amount taxed for postage and the amounts not taxable under the guidelines for copies and enter an amended judgment. *See The Landmark Winter Park, LLC v. Colman,*24 So.3d 787, 788-89 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). In all other respects, we affirm.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

WHATLEY, J., and DAKAN, STEPHEN L., Associate Senior Judge, Concur.
#### Edwards et ux. *v.*Wilson Oil Company.

[No. 19,443.

Filed February 4, 1963.]

*James T. Hooper, Sr.,*of Lawrenceburg, for appellants.

*Charles A. Lowe, Joseph M. Laneett,*both of Lawrenceburg, and *R. R. Mattingly,*of Aurora, for appellee.

Clements, J.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Dearborn Circuit Court wherein Wilson Oil Company, appellee here, brought this action as plaintiff against appellants, David A. Edwards and Catherine M. Edwards, to quiet title and for an injunction. The judgment of the trial court was in favor of appellee, Wilson Oil Company.

The appellants had petitioned the court for oral argument. Petition was granted and at the time assigned for oral argument appellants failed to appear.

The appellants’ brief, filed under Rule 2-17 of the rules of the Supreme Court, states that it contains a “concise statement of so much of the record as fully presents every error and objection relied upon.” This *291statement of the record contains the complaint, cross-complaint, judgment and motion for a new trial. The brief does not set out an answer to the complaint or cross-complaint.

Appellants’ original brief fails to contain a copy of the assignment of errors, as required by Rule 2-17, s *upra.*

The rules of the Supreme Court are binding upon this court as well as the litigants. In order to present an error on appeal it must be specified in the assignment of errors. The assignment of errors, or the substance thereof, must appear in the brief under Rule 2-17, *supra.*When there has been an omission of the assignment of errors from the appellant’s brief, the judgment will be affirmed. *Board of Med. Regist. and Exam., etc.*v. *Bowman*(1958), 238 Ind. 532, 534, 150 N. E. 2d 883; *Hughes et al.*v. *St. Bank of W. Terre Haute*(1954), 124 Ind. App. 511, 117 N. E. 2d 563.

Judgment affirmed.

Cooper, C. J., Carson and Ryan, JJ., concur.

Note. — Reported in 187 N. E. 2d 496.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2014-LC15 Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of March 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of WellsFargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1735 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1735

      To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide mandatory 
         imprisonment for certain kidnapings by illegal aliens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2007

 Mr. Buchanan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide mandatory 
         imprisonment for certain kidnapings by illegal aliens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clay Moore Kidnaping Prevention Act 
of 2007''.

SEC. 2. MANDATORY IMPRISONMENT FOR KIDNAPING BY ILLEGAL ALIENS.

    Section 1201(g)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking the period at the end and inserting ``and, if the defendant is 
an alien who commits the offense while unlawfully in the United States, 
shall include imprisonment for not less than 30 years.''
                                 <all>
```
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June1, 2014, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., asDepositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNRPARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC, as Trust Advisor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Certificate Administrator, as TaxAdministrator, and Custodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION asTrustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2014-LC16 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the the Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|