Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 194 / Thursday, October 7, 2010 / Notices 62103 

5 ‘‘GIN4 Mo,’’ ‘‘GIN5’’ and ‘‘GIN6’’ are the 

proprietary grades of Hitachi Metals America, Ltd. 

molybdenum. The steel also contains, 

by weight, carbon of between 1.0 and 

1.1 percent, sulfur of 0.020 percent or 

less, and includes between 0.20 and 

0.30 percent copper and between 0.20 

and 0.50 percent cobalt. This steel is 

sold under proprietary names such as 

‘‘GIN4 Mo.’’ The second excluded 

stainless steel strip in coils is similar to 

AISI 420–J2 and contains, by weight, 

carbon of between 0.62 and 0.70 

percent, silicon of between 0.20 and 

0.50 percent, manganese of between 

0.45 and 0.80 percent, phosphorus of no 

more than 0.025 percent and sulfur of 

no more than 0.020 percent. This steel 

has a carbide density on average of 100 

carbide particles per 100 square 

microns. An example of this product is 

‘‘GIN5’’ steel. The third specialty steel 

has a chemical composition similar to 

AISI 420 F, with carbon of between 0.37 

and 0.43 percent, molybdenum of 

between 1.15 and 1.35 percent, but 

lower manganese of between 0.20 and 

0.80 percent, phosphorus of no more 

than 0.025 percent, silicon of between 

0.20 and 0.50 percent, and sulfur of no 

more than 0.020 percent. This product 

is supplied with a hardness of more 

than Hv 500 guaranteed after customer 

processing, and is supplied as, for 

example, ‘‘GIN6’’.5

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this review are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum (‘‘Decision 

Memorandum’’) from Susan H. 

Kuhbach, Acting Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration, 

dated September 30, 2010, which is 

hereby adopted by this notice. Parties 

can find a complete discussion of all 

issues raised in this review and the 

corresponding recommendations in this 

public memorandum which is on file in 

the Central Records Unit, located in 

room 7046 of the main Commerce 

building. The issues include the 

likelihood of continuation or recurrence 

of a countervailable subsidy, the net 

countervailable subsidy likely to 

prevail, and the nature of the subsidy. 

In addition, a complete version of the 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the Web at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and 

electronic version of the Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Review 

The Department determines that 

revocation of the CVD order would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of a countervailable subsidy 

at the following weighted-average 

percentage rates: 

Manufacturers/exporters/producers 

Weighted-average 

subsidy rate 

(percent) 

Hyundai Steel Company—(formerly known as INI/BNG and as Inchon) ................................................................................... 0.54 

Dai Yang Metal Company ........................................................................................................................................................... 0.67 

Taihan .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4.64 

All Others ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 0.63 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing the 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: September 30, 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–25304 Filed 10–6–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–791–806] 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From 

South Africa: Final Results of 

Expedited Sunset Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On June 2, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) initiated the second 

sunset review of the countervailing duty 

order (‘‘CVD’’) on stainless steel plate in 

coils from South Africa pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (‘‘the Act’’). On the basis of 

a notice of intent to participate and an 

adequate substantive response filed on 

behalf of the domestic interested parties 

and an inadequate response from 

respondent interested parties (in this 

case, no response), the Department 

conducted an expedited sunset review 

of the CVD order pursuant to section 

751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B). As a result of this 

sunset review, the Department finds that 

revocation of the CVD order would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of a countervailable subsidy 

at the level indicated in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Effective Date: October 7, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric 

Greynolds or David Goldberger, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–6071 or (202) 482– 

4136, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 2, 2010, the Department 

initiated the second sunset review of the 

CVD order on stainless steel plate in 

coils from South Africa pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation 

of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 75 FR 

30777 (June 2, 2010). The Department 

received a notice of intent to participate 

from the following domestic interested 

parties: Allegheny Ludlum Corporation 

and the United Steel, Paper and 

Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, 

Energy, Allied Industrial and Service 

Workers International Union (United 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
62104 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 194 / Thursday, October 7, 2010 / Notices 

1With respect to the antidumping duty orders on 

certain stainless steel sheet and strip in coils from 

Mexico and Italy, the Department is conducting full 

sunset reviews. 

Steelworkers) (collectively, ‘‘domestic 

interested parties’’), within the deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). 

The domestic interested parties claimed 

interested party status under sections 

771(9)(C) and (D) of the Act, as a 

domestic producer of stainless steel 

plate in coils in the United States and 

a certified union representing workers 

in the domestic industry producing 

stainless steel plate in coils in the 

United States. 

The Department received an adequate 

substantive response collectively from 

the domestic interested parties within 

the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i). However, the 

Department did not receive a 

substantive response from any 

government or respondent interested 

party to this proceeding. As a result, 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), 

the Department conducted an expedited 

review of the CVD order. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the CVD 

order consists of stainless steel plate in 

coils. Stainless steel is an alloy steel 

containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or 

less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more 

of chromium, with or without other 

elements. The subject plate products are 

flat-rolled products, 254 mm or over in 

width and 4.75 mm or more in 

thickness, in coils, and annealed or 

otherwise heat treated and pickled or 

otherwise descaled. The subject plate 

may also be further processed (e.g., 

cold-rolled, polished, etc.) provided that 

it maintains the specified dimensions of 

plate following such processing. 

Excluded from the scope of the order 

are the following: (1) Plate not in coils, 

(2) plate that is not annealed or 

otherwise heat treated and pickled or 

otherwise descaled, (3) sheet and strip, 

and (4) flat bars. The merchandise 

subject to the order is currently 

classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) at subheadings: 

7219.11.00.30, 7219.11.00.60, 

7219.12.00.05, 7219.12.00.20, 

7219.12.00.25, 7219.12.00.50, 

7219.12.00.55, 7219.12.00.65, 

7219.12.00.70, 7219.12.00.80, 

7219.31.00.10, 7219.90.00.10, 

7219.90.00.20, 7219.90.00.25, 

7219.90.00.60, 7219.90.00.80, 

7220.11.00.00, 7220.20.10.10, 

7220.20.10.15, 7220.20.10.60, 

7220.20.10.80, 7220.20.60.05, 

7220.20.60.10, 7220.20.60.15, 

7220.20.60.60, 7220.20.60.80, 

7220.90.00.10, 7220.90.00.15, 

7220.90.00.60, and 7220.90.00.80. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this review are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum (‘‘Decision 

Memorandum’’) from Susan H. 

Kuhbach, Acting Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration, 

dated September 30, 2010, which is 

hereby adopted by this notice. Parties 

can find a complete discussion of all 

issues raised in this review and the 

corresponding recommendations in this 

public memorandum which is on file in 

the Central Records Unit, located in 

room 7046 of the main Commerce 

building. The issues include the 

likelihood of continuation or recurrence 

of a countervailable subsidy, the net 

countervailable subsidy likely to 

prevail, and the nature of the subsidy. 

In addition, a complete version of the 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the Web at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and 

electronic version of the Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Review 

The Department determines that 

revocation of the CVD order would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of a countervailable subsidy 

at the following weighted-average 

percentage rates: 

Manufacturers/exporters/ 

producers 

Weightedaverage 

subsidy rate 

(percent) 

Columbus Stainless .................. 3.95 

All Others .................................. 3.95 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing the 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: September 30, 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–25305 Filed 10–6–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–428–825, A–588–845, A–580–834, A–583– 

831] 

Certain Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip 

in Coils From Germany, Japan, the 

Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Final 

Results of the Expedited Second 

Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping 

Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On June 2, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated second sunset 

reviews of the antidumping duty orders 

on certain stainless steel sheet and strip 

in coils from Germany, Italy, Japan, the 

Republic of Korea (Korea), Mexico, and 

Taiwan, pursuant to section 751(c) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). The Department has conducted 

expedited (120-day) sunset reviews for 

the Germany, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan 

antidumping duty orders pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2).1 As a result 

of these sunset reviews, the Department 

finds that revocation of the antidumping 

duty orders would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Cordell or Angelica Mendoza, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0408, or (202) 

482–3019, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Background 

On June 2, 2010, the Department 

published the notice of initiation of the 

second sunset reviews of the 

antidumping duty orders on certain 

stainless steel sheet and strip in coils 

from Japan, Germany, Italy, Korea, 

Taiwan, and Mexico, pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation 

of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 75 FR 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES