alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2014, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as General Special Servicer,  NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as Co-op Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates  Series 2014-C20 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.         A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from May 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014,  and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2.         To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the period May 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.

 

 

/s/  Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
| (logo) usbank  | All of us serving you |
|---------------------|-----------------------|

 

 

**Annual Statement ofCompliance**

**Citigroup Commercial MortgageSecurities Inc.,**

**Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC21**

 

*VIA: EMAIL*

 

Citigroup Commercial MortgageSecurities Inc.

390 Greenwich Street, 5thFloor

New York, New York 10013

Attention: Paul Vanderslice

Email: paul.t.vanderslice@citi.com

 

GS Mortgage SecuritiesCorporation II, as Depositor for

GS Mortgage SecuritiesCorporation II, 

Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC20

&GS Mortgage SecuritiesCorporation II, 

Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2014-GC22

200 West Street

New York, New York 10282

Attention: Leah Nivison

Email: leah.nivison@gs.com

 

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Certificate Administrator for

GS Mortgage SecuritiesCorporation II, 

Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC20

&GS Mortgage SecuritiesCorporation II, 

Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC22

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, Maryland 21045

Email:  trustadministrationgroup@wellsfargo.com

Email:  cts.sec.notifications@wellsfargo.com

Attention: SEC Notifications

 

Re:          Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2014 (the“Agreement”) between Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.,as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Master Servicer,LNR Partners, LLC, as the Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, asthe Operating Advisor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as the CertificateAdministrator and Trustee.

 

 

I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, aSenior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, as a certifying servicer hereby certify that:

 

(1) A review of the activitiesof the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the“Reporting Period”) and of the performance of the CertificateAdministrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

 

(2) To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilledall its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutsuch Reporting Period. 

 

Capitalized terms used but notdefined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

 

 

Date: March 7, 2017

 

U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Certificate Administrator

 

By:  /s/Kimberly O.Jacobs     

Kimberly O. Jacobs

Senior Vice President
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brett D. Davis, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2014-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.             I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

 

----

 
| March 27, 2018 |   |                                                             |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   |                                                             |
|                | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis                                               |
|                | Name:  | Brett D. Davis                                                   |
|                | Title: | President (senior   officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1720 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1720

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
 amounts received on the sale of animals which are raised and sold as 
                    part of an educational program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2007

    Mr. Paul (for himself, Mr. Duncan, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Bartlett of 
Maryland, and Mr. Garrett of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
 amounts received on the sale of animals which are raised and sold as 
                    part of an educational program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Agriculture Education Freedom Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR AMOUNTS RECEIVED ON SALE OF 
              ANIMALS WHICH ARE RAISED AND SOLD AS PART OF EDUCATIONAL 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items specifically excluded 
from gross income) is amended by inserting after section 139A the 
following new section:

``SEC. 139B. PROCEEDS OF SALE OF ANIMALS RAISED AND SOLD AS PART OF 
              EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM.

    ``In the case of an individual, gross income shall not include any 
gain from the sale of any animal which is raised and sold by such 
individual as part of such individual's participation in--
            ``(1) the 4-H program under the Cooperative State Research, 
        Education, and Extension Service of the Department of 
        Agriculture,
            ``(2) the Future Farmers of America,
            ``(3) any program of an organization described in section 
        501(c) and exempt from tax under section 501(a) which is 
        similar to such 4-H program or the Future Farmers of America, 
        or
            ``(4) any program of an educational organization described 
        in section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii).''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for such part III is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 139 the 
following new item:

``Sec. 139B. Proceeds of sale of animals raised and sold as part of 
                            educational program''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to sales in taxable years ending after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,518
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  133,771
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,289
<PP&E>                                       7,115,383
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,190,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,071,309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,067
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,071,309
<SALES>                                        197,019
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               199,202
<CGS>                                           25,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 80,719
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             80,719
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    80,719
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
No. 11,779.

#### The Board of Commissioners of Martin County *v.*Pipher.

*Sheriff.*— Qounly *Commissioners.*— Expense *of Recapturing Escaped Prisoners.'*—A sheriff can not, as of right, demand'payment of a county for the-recapture of prisoners escaped from jail, or expenses incurred therein.

From the Martin Circuit Court.

*E. Moser, F. M. Shirey*and *T. J. Brooks,*for appellant.

*L. Stephens,*for appellee.

*125Filed Oct. 30, 1884.

Elliott, C. J.

The appellee was the sheriff of Martin county and in charge of the jail; two prisoners confined in it escaped; one of them was recaptured in Martin county; the other fled to Missouri; the appellee met the commissioners in the hall of the court-house and said to them that *“*if they would help him some,” he would go after the escaped prisoner, but that he would go whether aided or not, and the commissioners replied that they would assist him. The appellee did go and did recapture the prisoner, and this claim is for money expended in effecting the recapture.

The principle which rules this case is settled by our decisions. *Board, etc.,*v. *Bradford,*72 Ind. 455; S. C., 37 Am. R. 174; *Hight*v. *Board, etc.,*68 Ind. 575; *Board, etc.,*v. *Ward,*69 Ind. 441; *Miller*v. *Embree,*88 Ind. 133. Our cases are sustained by the decisions of other courts. *Hanger*v. *City of Des Moines,*52 Iowa, 193; S. C., 35 Am. R. 266; *Hawk*v. *Marion Co.,*48 Iowa, 472. There is a stronger reason for the rule in such a case as this than there is in the cases cited; for the sheriff is charged with the duty of keeping the prisoners safely imprisoned, and he has less reason to demand pay for services in recapturing those whom he has suffered to escape than a stranger has who is not charged with any duty. It might lead to great abuse to permit a sheriff who has suffered prisoners to escape to demand, as of right, compensation for recapturing and returning them to custody.

We are not called upon to decide whether the commissioners might not, in their discretion, voluntarily make an allowance in a proper case, and we intimate no opinion upon that question. We decide that a sheriff, who has suffered prisoners to escape, is not entitled, as a matter of right, to demand reimbursement for expenses incurred in recapturing them, or compensation for services performed in effecting the recapture.

Judgment reversed.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1701 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption 

from the harbor maintenance tax for certain shipping between United 

States mainland ports. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2007 

Mr. WELDON of Florida (for himself, Mr. NUNES, and Mr. SHAYS) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an exemption from the harbor maintenance tax for certain shipping between United States mainland ports. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Blue Water Highway 

5 Act of 2007’’. 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1701 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM HARBOR MAINTENANCE TAX 

2 FOR CERTAIN SHIPPING BETWEEN UNITED 

3 STATES MAINLAND PORTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4462 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating subsection 

6 (i) as subsection (j) and by inserting after subsection (h) 

7 the following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(i) EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN SHIPPING BETWEEN

9 UNITED STATES MAINLAND PORTS.—No tax shall be im10 posed under section 4461(a) with respect to— 

11 ‘‘(1) cargo contained in intermodal cargo con12 tainers and loaded by crane on a vessel or cargo 

13 loaded on a vessel by means of wheeled technology 

14 in a port in the United States mainland for trans15 portation to another port in the United States main16 land solely by coastal route or river (or combination 

17 thereof), and 

18 ‘‘(2) the unloading of cargo described in para19 graph (1) in a port in the United States mainland. 

20 For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘United States 

21 mainland’ has the meaning given such term in subsection 

22 (b).’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

24 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

25 of this Act. 

Æ 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
#### C.P., Mother of K.Z.W. and K.L.W., Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 5D10-3027.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 18, 2011.

*912Paulina • Minelga, Daytona Beach and Jeffrey Deen and Lori D. Loftis, Office of the Criminal and Civil Regional Counsel, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant.

Karla Perkins, Department of Children and Families, Miami, for Appellee.

Wendie Michelle Cooper, Tavares, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

Pursuant to Appellee’s confession of error, the order on appeal Placing Children in a Permanent Guardianship and Terminating Protective Supervision, is reversed and remanded to the trial court for the appropriate further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ. concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Terry L. CLARKSON.

No. 2010-KK-1625.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 29, 2010.

*273PER CURIAM.

h Granted. The order of the court of appeal is vacated to the extent that it determined that the non-capital offenses charged in the grand jury indictment had prescribed as a matter of La.C.Cr.P. art. 578(A)(2), and the trial court’s judgment denying defendant’s motion to quash in its entirety is reinstated.

In the grand jury indictment returned on November 26, 2007, the state joined a capital charge of first-degree murder with five other counts charging non-capital felonies. The joinder was improper at the outset. *State v. Strickland,*94-0025, p. 10 (La.11/1/96), 683 So.2d 218, 225 (To the extent that a capital charge requires a unanimous 12-person verdict and a non-capital charge necessarily punishable at hard labor requires a concurrence only of 10 of 12 jurors, “the joinder of capital and non-capital charges in a single indictment violates the terms of La.C.Cr.P. art. 493 and La. Const, art. 1, § 17.”) (citing *State v. McZeal,*352 So.2d 592, 601 (La.1977)). However, defendant did not move immediately to |2quash the indictment on grounds of misjoinder of offenses, La. C.Cr.P. art. 495, and the state thereafter elected to forego capital punishment on the count of first degree murder. The election had the effect of rendering joinder of the offenses proper under La.C.Cr.P. art. 493.2, which permits joinder of non-capital felonies, even if they are not separately triable by the same mode of trial, provided that trial of the joined offenses is conducted before a jury of 12 persons, 10 of whom must concur to render a lawful verdict. *See*La.R.S. 14:30(0(2) (2007 La. Acts 125) (“If the district attorney does not seek a capital verdict, the offender shall be punished by life imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence. The provisions of C.Cr.P. Art. 782 relative to cases in which punishment is necessarily confinement at hard labor shall apply.”); La.C.Cr.P. art. 782(A) (“Cases in which punishment is necessarily confinement at hard labor shall be tried by a jury composed of twelve jurors, ten of whom must concur to render a verdict.”).

However, the state’s election to forego capital punishment did not change the time period for bringing the charge of first degree murder to trial, or three years from institution of prosecution, “in capital cases.” La.C.Cr.P. art. 578(A)(1). That charge began as a capital prosecution, and “[t]he offense charged shall determine the applicable limitation.” La.C.Cr.P. art. 578(B). As a result, all of the charges now properly joined with the first-degree murder count in a single proceeding are subject to the three-year time limit for the *case,*although if charged separately at the outset, they were subject to the two-year time limit imposed by La.C.Cr.P. art. 578(A)(2) for trial of non-capital felonies. The trial court therefore properly denied defendant’s motion to'quash on March 4, 2010, several months before the three-year limit on the prosecution was set to expire.
|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/ Edward J. Fritsch                            |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward J. FritschPresident and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| April 28, 2010                               |   |

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO DOMESTIC

RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES

COMMITTEE :

:

:

:

: No. 677

CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26 th day of January, 2018, the Honorable George W. Wheeler,

Tioga County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Domestic Relat ions Procedural

Rules Committee for a term of three years, commencing March 1, 2018.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liberty Property Trust (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, in
connection with Rule , that based on my knowledge: (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR.  
 Date: May 7, 2004