alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

 <ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,548
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          60,165
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            60,554
<LOANS>                                        971,021
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,363,950
<DEPOSITS>                                     974,983
<SHORT-TERM>                                    55,050
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             18,535
<LONG-TERM>                                    215,465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,857
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,363,950
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 17,909
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,064
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 4,854
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                23,827
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,676
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,665
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,162
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      150
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,276
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,276
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,686
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.42
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,412
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,534
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,369
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,622
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       71
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,701
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,701
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Lorenza SESSIONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D09-1061.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 27, 2011.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Y. Mclntire, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*Affirmed. See Williams v. State,*40 So.3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 4.2

	
	0000001
SEE REVERSE FOR IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING OWNERSHIP AND
TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS AND CERTAIN OTHER INFORMATION
CUSIP
SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO, CANADA
SERIES A COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENT CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
SPECIMEN
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF SERIES A COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENT CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK $0.0001 PAR VALUE, OF
THE ONCOLOGY INSTITUTE CORP.
transferable  on  the  books  of  the  Company  in  Person  or  by  duly  authorized  attorney,  upon  surrender  of  this  Certificate  properly  endorsed.  This  Certificate  and  the
shares represented hereby, are issued and shall be held subject to all of the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation, as it may be amended, and the Bylaws, as they may
be amended, of the Company (copies of which are on file with the Company and with the Transfer Agent), to all of which each holder, by acceptance hereof, assents. This
Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.
WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Company and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.





	
	of Preferred stock represented by this cerificate and do hereby irrevocably
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIR D DISTRIC T, AT AU STIN NO. 03-01-00504-CR

Baso Ear l Har per, Jr ., Appellant v. The State of Texas , Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DIS TRICT

NO. 50,373, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING Appe llantBas o Earl

Harpe r, Jr., wa s pl

ac ed on de f er re d adj udi ca

ti on com m un i ty su pe rvi si on aft er ple ad ing gu ilt y t o as sa ult o n a family mem ber. SeeTex. Pen. Code An n. § 22.01 (West Supp. 2 002). The dis trict court la

ter revoked supervis ion, adj udic ated guil t, and im posed sentence of im

prisonm ent for six y

ears. Appellant’s co ur t - ap po int ed at t o rne y filed a b r ief c o nc lud ing t ha t t he ap pe al is fri volous and wi

thout m eri t. Th e b rief meets th e r eq ui re men ts o f Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967 ), by pre sent ing a pr ofe ssio nal evalua t ion o f the re co rd demo nst ra t ing why t her e ar e no ar gu ab le grounds to be ad

va nc ed. See also Pens on v. Ohio , 488 U.S . 75 (19 88) ; High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (T ex. Cr im . App . 19 78) ; Currie v. State , 516 S. W.2d 684 (T ex. Cr im . App . 19 74) ; Jackson v. State , 485 S. W.2d 553 (T ex. Cr im . App . 19 72) ; Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969) .2 Appe llant filed a p ro se br ief. I n it, he ad dr esse s t he allega t ions t hat he violat ed t he co ndit ions of s

uperv i sion by f ail i ng to pa y va ri o us fe es an d c o st s a nd by fa iling t o pa r t icip at e in com m un i ty servi ceproj ec ts. The

rec or d re fl

ects, ho wever, t hat the co urt did not fi nd these allegat ions t o be true. The co ur t re vok ed s olely on t he bas is of ap pellant ’s co mmi ssio n of su bseq uent crim in al off enses. In hi s pro se brief, appell ant concedes t he subsequent offen ses. We have revi

ewed the reco rd, co unsel ’s bri ef, and the pro se bri ef . We ag re e t hat t he appeal is fri volous an d without meri

t. Co unsel ’s m

ot ion to withdraw is granted. The j udgme

nt of convi

ction i s af fi rmed.

__________________________________________ Lee Yeakel, Justice Be f ore J us ti ce s K i dd, Ye ak el

an d Pa tters on Af fi rmed File d: January

10, 2002 Do No t Publis

h
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT MARCH 31, 1997
(UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,592
<SECURITIES>                                     7,608
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,301
<ALLOWANCES>                                       752
<INVENTORY>                                      3,167
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,073
<PP&E>                                           7,281
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,854
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           155
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,815
<SALES>                                         16,007
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,007
<CGS>                                            5,499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,162
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,539
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,634
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,905
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,905
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ViewCast.com, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  May 14, 2009
    /s/  Laurie L. LathamLaurie L. LathamChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-3 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2015 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 18, 2014, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive
Auto Receivables Trust 2014-3 and U.S. Bank National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC./s/ Jennifer M. DavisName:

Jennifer M. DavisTitle:

Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 29, 2016/s/ Rich MorrinName:

Rich MorrinTitle:

Chief Operating OfficerDate:

March 29, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                           2,705
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,024
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,394
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                15,467
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    290,374
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         286,435
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,939
<LOANS>                                        498,697
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 838,533
<DEPOSITS>                                     445,241
<SHORT-TERM>                                   292,408
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             16,465
<LONG-TERM>                                     29,556
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,602
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 838,533
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,855
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 5,965
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,820
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,649
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,899
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,272
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,084
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,337
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,899
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,899
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        1,157
<NET-INCOME>                                       742
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.68
<LOANS-NON>                                     11,071
<LOANS-PAST>                                     6,069
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   428
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 24,251
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,356
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      155
<RECOVERIES>                                       125
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,386
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,876
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,876
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,798
<SECURITIES>                                    19,551
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                       414
<INVENTORY>                                      6,365
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,422
<PP&E>                                           5,023
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,862
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,520
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,862
<SALES>                                         19,502
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,502
<CGS>                                           15,109
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    419
<INCOME-TAX>                                       180
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                239
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       239
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1734 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 1734

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2008

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 630 Northeast Killingsworth Avenue in Portland, Oregon, as the ``Dr. 
                 Martin Luther King, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 630 Northeast Killingsworth Avenue in Portland, Oregon, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Martin 
Luther King, Jr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1770

In re: NORMAN ALAN KERR, 

 Petitioner. 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

(No. 1:09-cr-00290-NCT-1)

Submitted: September 11, 2012 Decided: September 13, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Norman Alan Kerr, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Norman Alan Kerr petitions this court for a writ of 

mandamus, seeking an order directing his immediate release from 

imprisonment. We conclude that Kerr is not entitled to mandamus 

relief. 

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used 

only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court,

426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 

509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is 

available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the 

relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 

135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Mandamus may not be used as a 

substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 

351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). 

The relief sought by Kerr is not available by way of 

mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis and grant Kerr’s motion seeking leave to file an 

amended petition for a writ of mandamus, we deny the original 

and amended petitions for a writ of mandamus. We also deny as 

moot Kerr’s motion for reappointment of new counsel and dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITIONS DENIED
#### Paul WOODALL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-0668.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 29, 2011.

Paul Woodall, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner filed a motion to modify his sentence in the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). The trial court denied the motion as untimely. We treat the petitioner’s notice of appeal as a petition for certiorari and deny the petition. *See Platt v. State,*890 So.2d 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); *Davis v. State,*745 So.2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

DENIED.

DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1696 

To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian 

Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 

tribe to determine blood quantum requirement for membership in that 

Tribe. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2007 

Mr. REYES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and 

Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to 

allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo tribe to determine blood 

quantum requirement for membership in that Tribe. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BLOOD QUANTUM REQUIREMENT DETER4 MINED BY TRIBE. 

5 Section 108(a)(2) of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and 

6 Alabama and Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restora7 tion Act (25 U.S.C. 1300g–7(2)) is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘if the descendant’’ and all that follows through the end 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1696 IH

1 of the paragraph and inserting ‘‘if the descendant is en2 rolled by the tribe’’. 

Æ 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
#### Harold BROOKS v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS.

No. 2011-C-2760.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 2011.

*1185In re Louisiana Department of Public Safety; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 10-C-8450-A; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 11-71.

Not considered. Not timely filed. See Supreme Court Rule X, Section 5(a).
650 A.2d 958

#### PHYLLIS CARLIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PHILIP R. CARLIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

December 16, 1994.

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on an appeal as of right pursuant to *Rule*2:2-l(a)(l), and the Court having determined that the matter does not present a substantial constitutional question within the meaning of the *Rule*or applicable case law, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the within appeal is dismissed.