alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-19-00146-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-2018-02457

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MICHAEL SCHRADE A/K/A MICHAEL R. SCHRADE, Appellant

V.

AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On April 29, 2019, and May 13, 2019, we notified appellant, in accordance with 

rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless appellant 

paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 44.3. Appellant has not done so. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellant has not complied with a procedural requirement and the 

Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2015,1 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: June 6, 2019

 1

See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases 

in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, 

Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’ fees).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                   EXHIBIT 11

              Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings

               Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2002 and 2001

                (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

                                                       Three months ended             Nine months ended
                                                           March 31,                       March 31,
                                                       ------------------             -------------------
                                                       2002         2001              2002           2001
                                                       ----         ----              ----           ----

<S>                                                <C>           <C>              <C>             <C>
Net income ...................................     $     3,604   $     3,039      $    10,728     $     9,248
                                                   ===========   ===========      ===========     ===========

Number of shares outstanding:
Weighted average shares issued ...............      11,900,000    11,900,000       11,900,000      11,900,000
Less: Weighted average shares held in treasury       4,450,067     3,956,429        4,339,762       3,819,752
Less: Average shares held by the ESOP ........         952,000       952,000          952,000         952,000
Plus: ESOP shares released or committed to be
      released during the fiscal year ........         675,393       565,766          647,298         539,622
                                                    ----------    ----------       ----------      ----------
Average basic shares .........................       7,173,326     7,557,337        7,255,536       7,667,870
Plus: Average common stock equivalents .......         529,671       539,156          534,845         469,570
                                                    ----------    ----------       ----------      ----------
Average diluted shares .......................       7,702,997     8,096,493        7,790,381       8,137,440
                                                    ==========    ==========       ==========      ==========

Earnings per common share:
        Basic ................................     $      0.50   $      0.40      $      1.48     $      1.21
                                                   ===========   ===========      ===========     ===========
        Diluted ..............................     $      0.47   $      0.38      $      1.38     $      1.14
                                                   ===========   ===========      ===========     ===========

</TABLE>
#### Christy STRICKLAND, et al. v. COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., et al.

No. 2010-CC-2183.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Byrd Regional Hospital; Community Health Systems Inc. et al. Community *389Health Systems Prof. Services Corp.; National Health Care of Leesville Inc. d/b/ a; —Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Vernon, 30th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 75,186; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 10-00755.

Denied.

CLARK, J., would grant.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24848]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


President's Committee on the National Medal of Science; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:
    Name: President's Committee on the National Medal of Science 
(1182).
    Date and Time: Wednesday, October 20, 2010, 8:30 a.m.-1:30 p.m.
    Place: Conference Room, Hilton Arlington Hotel, 950 North Stafford 
Street, Arlington, VA 22203.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Ms. Mayra Montrose, Program Manager, Room 1282, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: 703-292-4757.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
President in the selection of the 2010 National Medal of Science 
recipients.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate nominations as part of the selection 
process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The nominations being reviewed include 
information of a personal nature where disclosure would constitute 
unwarranted invasions of personal privacy. These matters are exempt 
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 29, 2010.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-24848 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
627 A.2d 1131

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ERNESTO M. RIVERA.

January 28, 1993.

Petition for certification is granted, and the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily affirmed insofar as it remands the matter to the Law Division, the remand proceedings to be in accordance with *State v. Shaw,*131 *N.J.*1, 618 A.2d 294 (1993). The remainder of that portion of the judgment that is before the Court on the petition for certification is summarily reversed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Darrin ROBINSON.

No. 2010-KO-1549.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2011.

In re Robinson, Darrin; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of East Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 07-CR-415; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2008 KA 0820 R.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gregory Lee FRAZIER.

No. 2011-KK-0703.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2011.

In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 2, Nos. 259,182, 281,-755; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 46439-KW, 46442-KW.

Denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 1, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 131376 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 131376 COA: 258817 Wayne CC: 04-005801-01 JIMMY MICHAEL LOFTIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 13, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1025 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 1, 2006

Clerk
#### Sultan SHAKIR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D09-2660.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 7, 2010.

Sultan Shakir, Miami, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene C. Hvizd, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals an order summarily denying his motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Rule 3.800(a). Appellant was sentenced to five years of probation with the condition that he complete six months of inpatient drug treatment. For reasons unspecified in the record, appel*77lant breached the conditions of his probation and was sentenced to five years in prison. In his motion to correct, appellant seeks jail credit for time spent in the drug treatment program as well as credit for time spent in the county jail awaiting transfer to the rehabilitation facility.

The trial court was correct to deny appellant’s motion insofar as it related to credit for time served in the drag treatment program, and we affirm the order in this respect. *See Comer v. State,*909 So.2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). However, the trial court did not address appellant’s claim for credit for time served in the county jail after imposition of the original sentence. A defendant “is entitled to credit for time spent in jail awaiting placement into a drug treatment facility imposed as a condition of probation.” *LaLonde v. State,*941 So.2d 586, 587 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Appellant alleged a prima facie claim for this credit by stating the date range during which he was in the county jail after sentencing but before his placement at the rehabilitation center. *See Kitchen v. State,*20 So.3d 975, 977 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (finding a motion to correct facially sufficient where the “defendant provided the dates of his incarceration in the county jail”). Accordingly, we reverse in part the summary denial of appellant’s motion and remand for the trial court to consider appellant’s claim for credit for time spent in jail awaiting placement into the inpatient drug treatment facility.

*Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded for further proceedings.*

TAYLOR, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
860 A.2d 925

#### IN THE MATTER OF PETER A. WOOD, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

November 18, 2004.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-127, concluding that PETER A. WOOD of WILLIAMSTOWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1993, and who has been suspended from the practice of law since November 14, 2002, pursuant to Orders of the Court filed on November 14, 2002, and March 12, 2003, should be suspended from practice for a period of three months for violating *Rule*1:20— 20 (future activities of disciplined attorneys), *RPC*8.1(a) and (b) (false statement of material fact to, and failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), *RPC*8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), and *RPC*8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a one-year suspension from practice is warranted;

And PETER A. WOOD having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PETER A. WOOD is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall not be reinstated to practice unless and until he provides a satisfactory explanation for his failure to participate as required in the ethics proceedings against him; and it is further

*34ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent continue to comply with *Rule*1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*l:20-20(c), respondent’s failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of *Rule*1:20 — 20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent’s petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of *RPC*8.1(b) and *RPC*8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to *Rule*1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

	

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 

Pursuant to Section 906 

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Tripos, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(b)	information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

 

 

	/s/ John P. McAlister
	John P. McAlister

	Chief Executive Officer

	November 9, 2005

 

	/s/ B. James Rubin
	B. James Rubin

	Chief Financial Officer

	November 9, 2005
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


RULE
13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)


OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





I,
Michael D. Burger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
quarterly report of Merix Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended November 28, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Merix
Corporation.








By: /s/ MICHAEL D.
BURGER


Michael
D. Burger


Director,
President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)





January
4, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.2

         Certification of Chief Financial Officer of FirstBank NW Corp.
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of FirstBank NW
Corp. ("the Company") for the year ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Larry
K. Moxley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 19
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         o        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
                  13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended, and

         o        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the Company's financial condition and
                  results of operations.


/s/ LARRY K. MOXLEY
----------------------------------------
Larry K. Moxley, Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 30, 2006
#### Daniel BERLOFF, Appellant v. Sumner G. WHITTIER, Administrator of Veterans Affairs, et al., Appellees.

No. 15031.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued April 7, 1960.

Decided April 21, 1960.

Mr. Andrew L. Geisler, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Miss Doris H. Spangenburg, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellees. Mr. Nathan J. Paulson, Asst. U. S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellees.

Before Mr. Justice Burton, retired,* and Bazelon and Bastían, Circuit Judges.

*

 Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 294(a).

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court granting defendants’ (appellees’) motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint in a suit for restoration to civil service employment. The record discloses no denial of procedural rights.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                        2307
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                34255
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             36562
<PP&E>                                     4732083
<DEPRECIATION>                             2532102
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2249718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       733913
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     81129
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                  43168
<OTHER-SE>                                 1247031
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2249718
<SALES>                                      88249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             88249
<CGS>                                        32638
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               353132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           39560
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (278349)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (278349)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.03)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATIONS





The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of Valley Financial Corporation, certifies that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).




Dated:  May 11, 2011
By:
/s/ Ellis L. GutshallChief Executive Officer


47
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25156]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been revoked 
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 
409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing 
of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515, effective on 
the corresponding date shown below:

    License Number: 3106F.
    Name: I.T.E.C., Inc.
    Address: 165 Harrington Avenue, Warwick, RI 02888.
    Date Revoked: September 2, 2010.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 3565F.
    Name: B.A. International Forwarding Inc.
    Address: 360 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07362.
    Date Revoked: September 25, 2010.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 4481F.
    Name: JFJ Freight Forwarders Inc.
    Address: 13100 NW 113th Avenue Road, Miami, FL 33178.
    Date Revoked: September 16, 2010.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 8655N.
    Name: Carpe Air & Sea Shipping, Inc.
    Address: 360 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632.
    Date Revoked: September 25, 2010.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 13853N.
    Name: Unitas Shipping Inc.
    Address: 177-25 Rockaway Blvd., Suite 203, Jamaica, NY 11434.
    Date Revoked: September 10, 2010.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 020298NF.
    Name: A A Shipping Incorporated.
    Address: 11526 Harwin Drive, Houston, TX 77072.
    Date Revoked: September 27, 2010.
    Reason: Failed to maintain valid bonds.

    License Number: 020634NF.
    Name: Sofilink Continental, Inc.
    Address: 6313 NW 99th Avenue, Miami, FL 33178.
    Date Revoked: September 23, 2010.
    Reason: Failed to maintain valid bonds.

    License Number: 021509N.
    Name: Apex Maritime Co. (PDX) Inc.
    Address: 11818 SE Mill Plain Blvd., Suite 309, Vancouver, WA 98684.
    Date Revoked: September 16, 2010.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 021520NF.
    Name: GFS Global Logistics, LLC.
    Address: 1691 Phoenix Blvd., Suite 170, Atlanta, GA 30349.
    Date Revoked: October 1, 2010.
    Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.

    License Number: 021953F.
    Name: Express Shipping Company of Illinois.
    Address: 670 E. Northwest Hwy., 2nd Floor, Arlington Heights, IL 
60004.
    Date Revoked: September 2, 2010.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2010-25156 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```