alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 302**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

I, Edward J. Fritsch, certify that: 

 

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Highwoods Properties Inc.; |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: March 2, 2008

 

| /s/ EDWARDJ.FRITSCH                                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward J. FritschPresident and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

| * | Paragraphs 4 and 5, omitted here, are included in Exhibit 31.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Highwoods Properties, Inc. on August 9, 2007. |
|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7304 

To authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to issue Border Wall Bonds, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2018 

Mr. HARRIS (for himself, Mr. GAETZ, and Mr. GRIFFITH) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to issue Border 

Wall Bonds, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BORDER WALL BONDS; BORDER WALL TRUST 

4 FUND. 

5 (a) AUTHORITY TO ISSUE BORDER WALL BONDS.— 

6 Section 3102 of title 31, United States Code, is amended 

7 by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(f) BORDER WALL BONDS.—The Secretary is au9 thorized to issue bonds under this section, to be known 

10 as ‘Border Wall Bonds’. The bonds authorized by this subVerDate Sep 11 2014 18:41 Dec 18, 2018 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7304.IH H7304

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7304 IH

1 section shall be in such form and denominations, and shall 

2 be subject to such terms and conditions of issue, conver3 sion, redemption, maturation, payment, and rate of inter4 est as the Secretary may prescribe, except that no interest 

5 shall be payable with respect to such a bond before the 

6 date that is ten years after the date of the enactment of 

7 this subsection.’’. 

8 (b) BORDER WALL TRUST FUND.— 

9 (1) ESTABLISHMENT OF TRUST FUND.—There 

10 is established in the Treasury of the United States 

11 a trust fund to be known as the ‘‘Border Wall Trust 

12 Fund’’, consisting of such amounts as may be appro13 priated, credited, or transferred to such Trust Fund 

14 as provided in this section or other provision of law. 

15 (2) TRANSFERS TO TRUST FUND.—There are 

16 hereby appropriated to the Border Wall Trust Fund 

17 amounts equivalent to all revenues derived from the 

18 sale and issuance of Border Wall Bonds issued 

19 under section 3102 of title 31, United States Code. 

20 (3) EXPENDITURES FROM TRUST FUND.— 

21 Amounts in the Border Wall Trust Fund shall be 

22 available only for purposes of making expenditures 

23 to build a physical barrier along the southern border 

24 of the United States. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7312 

To make innovative technology loan guarantee support available for battery 

storage technologies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2018 

Mr. TAKANO (for himself and Mr. COLLINS of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To make innovative technology loan guarantee support 

available for battery storage technologies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Battery Storage Inno5 vation Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 7312 IH

1 SEC. 2. BATTERY STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES. 

2 Section 1703(b) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 

3 (42 U.S.C. 16513(b)) is amended by adding at the end 

4 the following new paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(11) Battery storage technologies for residen6 tial, industrial, or transportation applications.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D 20

- 0861

_____________________________

J OSEPH H ERRING

,

Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA

,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Liberty County

. Robert R. Wheeler , Judge

.

September 28, 2022

L ONG

, J

.

Following his admission to multiple violation s of his probation

, Herring now appeals the revocation of his probation and resulting sentence

. He asserts that the trial court erred by relying on impermissible considerations in revoking probation and imposing the sentence

. We affirm.

After completing his prison sentence for a DUI manslaughter conviction, Herr ing was released in 2017 and began a four

- year probation term. Herring then violated his probation by failing to report to his probation officer and testing positive for illegal drugs. Herring then entered a written admission, acknowledging that he
willf ully violated the terms of his probation. At the probation violation hearing, t he court found that the nature of Herring ’s2 violations demonstrated he “was not a good candidate for probation

. ”

Even where a defendant enters an admission, he can still
cha llenge a sentencing error if properly preserved. Herring argues there was a sentencing error ; but his claim is not preserved. Sentencing errors may not be raised on appeal unless the appellant objected to the error at the time of sentencing or timely fil ed a
motion under Fl orid a R ule of Crim inal P rocedure 3.800(b). Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(e); see also Jackson v. State, 983 So. 2d 562, 565 (Fla. 2008). Herring did neither.

Nevertheless, Herring’s primary argument is to quibble with
the trial court’s characterization of his violations as “blatant.” Herring claims there is not sufficient evidence to support this finding and that the court must have relied on some impermissible
consideratio ns in reaching it. But this is not a legal finding at all. It is not required for the revocation, or the sentence imposed. It is a passing comment explaining the court’s general evaluation and perception of the case. And the comment was not out of the blue

— it came after Herring admitted to intentionally violating his probation by using illegal drugs and failing to contact his probation officer for an extended period. T his wa s far from error. We reject Herring’s additional arguments without further dis cussion.

A FFIRMED

.

R AY and N ORDBY

, JJ., concur

.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or

9.331

.

_____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee

, for Appellant.3 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jovona I. Parker, Assistant Attorney General

, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert CARLEY, et al.

No. 2011-KD-0952.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2011.

In re Carley, Robert; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of West Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. W-04-3-77; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 0815.

Denied.
#### Freddie J. CASH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D09-4107.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 29, 2010.

Freddie J. Cash, pro se, Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Ian M. Cotner, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Freddie J. Cash, appears before this court for the ninth time in connection with his conviction of sexual battery in Duval County, Fourth Judicial Circuit case number 90-9224-CF. After reviewing the issue raised by Mr. Cash in this appeal and determining that it was without merit, this court issued a *Spencer*order directing Mr. Cash to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future *pro se*access to this court in this connection with this case. *See State v. Spencer,*751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999). After carefully reviewing Mr. Cash’s response, we conclude that Mr. Cash is abusing the judicial system. Therefore, he is prohibited from further *pro se*filings. *See Tucker v. State,*40 So.3d 920 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010); *Simpkins v. State,*909 So.2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Accordingly, in order to conserve judicial resources, we prohibit Freddie J. Cash from filing with this Court any further *pro se*pleadings or papers concerning Duval County, Fourth Judicial Circuit case number 90-9224-CF. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further *pro se*filings concerning this case. Such pleadings will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless they are filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar.

AFFIRMED; future *pro se*filings PROHIBITED.

BENTON, C.J., THOMAS and ROWE, JJ., concur.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tyron StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

** ****ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE** Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2014, by and among RBS COMMERICAL FUNDING INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as Co-op Special Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC., as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C21 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 1. A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.  /s/ Daniel BoberDaniel BoberExecutive Vice PresidentWells Fargo Bank  
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 194 (Thursday, October 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62113-62114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25354]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Board on Coastal Engineering Research

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
committee meeting:
    Name of Committee: Board on Coastal Engineering Research.
    Date of Meeting: October 25-26, 2010.
    Place: Atlanta Airport Marriott Gateway, 2020 Convention Center 
Concourse, Atlanta, GA 30337.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 6:15 p.m. (October 25, 2010). 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. 
(October 26, 2010).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquiries and notice of intent to 
attend the meeting may be addressed to COL Gary E. Johnston, Executive 
Secretary, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, 
Waterways Experiment Station, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS 
39180-6199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board provides broad policy guidance and 
review of plans and fund requirements for the conduct of research and 
development of research projects in consonance with the needs of the 
coastal engineering field and the objectives of the Chief of Engineers.
    Proposed Agenda: The afternoon of October 25, the Executive Session 
is devoted to (1) Review old business; (2) continue a climate change 
dialogue from the previous Board meeting; and (3) hear and discuss a 
presentation concerning IOOS.
    On Tuesday, October 26, there will be (1) An Engineer Research and 
Development Center update on the oil spill response; (2) updates on 
coastal engineering oriented research and development activities to 
include navigation, flood and coastal, and environmental; (3) 
discussion of the Board on Coastal Engineering Research and the 
Environmental Advisory Board; (4) discussion of Regional Sediment 
Management including the history, the program, and policy; and (5) 
discussion of the next full meeting.
    The meeting is open to the public, but since seating capacity of 
the meeting

[[Page 62114]]

room is limited, advance notice of intent to attend is required.

Gary E. Johnston,
Colonel, Corps of Engineers, Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25354 Filed 10-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 96-6370 RONALD RAY YOST, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-47, CA-95-891) Submitted: January 20, 1998 Decided: April 17, 1998 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Ronald Ray Yost, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________OPINION PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We havereviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Appellant asserts that he was denied due process of law at sentencing because the Government failed to show and the court failed to expressly find that the methamphetamine attributed to Appellant was D-methamphetamine. Appellant failed to raise this issue on direct appeal. We conclude that even if Appellant has demonstrated cause for his default, he has not established actual prejudice. We therefore find the claim barred by his default. See United States v. Frady , 456 U.S. 152, 167-68 (1982). Appellant also asserts that counsel was ineffective at sentencingand on appeal for failing to challenge an inadequate factual determination as to type of methamphetamine attributed to him at sentencing. We affirm the district court's order as to this claim because Appellant failed to establish that but for counsel's errors, he would not have pled guilty. See Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985); Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Finally, we find that Appellanthas waived review of his claim that the district court abused its discretion when it assumed the substance attributed to Appellant was Dmethamphetamine because he did not raise this claim at sentencing or on direct appeal. See Stone v. Powell , 428 U.S. 465, 477 n.10 (1976); United States v. Emanuel , 869 F.2d 795, 796 (4th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          27,898
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,299
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                32,200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          79,436
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            79,198
<LOANS>                                        220,057
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 362,818
<DEPOSITS>                                     325,890
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,965
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,463
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 362,818
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,507
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,282
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   380
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,169
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,436
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,436
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,733
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      406
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,672
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,672
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,523
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.80
<LOANS-NON>                                        781
<LOANS-PAST>                                        39
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,410
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       43
<RECOVERIES>                                        66
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,433
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,433
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         520,152
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,022,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,014,479
<PP&E>                                     101,116,165
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,826,515
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              89,071,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,648,868
<BONDS>                                     49,390,975
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,400
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,927,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                89,071,033
<SALES>                                      9,065,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,065,680
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,087,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,621,970
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,050,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                362,258
<INCOME-TAX>                                   144,898
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            217,360
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   217,360
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000376 16-MAY-2014 08:29 AM
EX-10.8





 Exhibit 10.8 

Vahanna Tech Edge Acquisition I Corp. 

(the “Company”) 

Surrender of Shares 

Pursuant to sections 59(1A) and 59(1B) 

of the 
 BVI Business Companies Act
(as amended) 
 Vahanna LLC (the “Surrendering Member”) does hereby irrevocably surrender to the Company 1,437,500 Class B ordinary
shares (the “Shares”) registered in the name of the Surrendering Member in the register of members of the Company for no consideration. 

The Surrendering Member further confirms that the Shares are fully paid up shares of the Company. 

Signed by the Surrendering Member 
  

	
	 /s/ Vinode Ramgopal

	For and on behalf of
	Vahanna LLC
	Dated this 28th day of October 2021