alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3.2 (b)

                                   RESOLUTIONS


         I, the undersigned Secretary of FirstBank NW Corp, do hereby certify
that the following resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of the Board of
Directors at a meeting of said Board held on the 23rd day of May, 2002, a quorum
being present.

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has determined that it would be
beneficial to allow shareholders to vote their shares electronically at
shareholder meetings in order to provide the opportunity for increased
shareholder participation and to reduce postage and mailing costs; now,
therefore, be it

         RESOLVED, that Article II, Section 9 of the Bylaws of the Company be
revised as follows:

               SECTION 9.    Proxies. At all meetings of shareholders, a
               shareholder may vote by proxy executed in writing by the
               shareholder or by his duly authorized attorney in fact, however,
               electronic transmission of proxies is allowed to the full extent
               permitted by Washington law. Proxies solicited on behalf of
               management shall be voted as directed by the shareholder or, in
               the absence of such direction, as determined by a majority of the
               board of directors. All proxies shall be filed with the secretary
               of the corporation before or at the commencement of meetings. No
               proxy may be effectively revoked until notice in writing of such
               revocation has been given to the secretary of the corporation by
               the shareholder (or his duly authorized attorney in fact, as the
               case may be) granting the proxy. No proxy shall be valid after
               eleven months from the date of its execution unless it is coupled
               with an interest.

         I, the undersigned Secretary of FirstBank NW Corp, do hereby certify
that the above resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of the Board of
Directors of the Company.

Date:  May 23, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1594 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1594

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic in 
    Hermitage, Pennsylvania, as the Michael A. Marzano Department of 
                   Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MICHAEL A. MARZANO DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC.
    (a) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 
Clinic in Hermitage, Pennsylvania, shall after the date of the 
enactment of this Act be known and designated as the ``Michael A. 
Marzano Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States to the outpatient 
clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 
reference to the Michael A. Marzano Department of Veterans Affairs 
Outpatient Clinic.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: : No. 530

:

MEDICAL MARIJUANA ACT : JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW

, this 11 th day of February

, 20 20

, pursuant to the authority

granted by Article V, Section 10 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, this Court

hereby O rders as follows

.

No judge shall have a financial interest, as defined by Section 2101.1(e) of

the Medical Marijuana Act ( 35 P.S. § 10231.2101.1(e) ), in or be employed

, directly

or indirectly, by a medical marijuana organization

, or by any holding company,

affiliate, intermediary or subsidiary thereof

. The term “ judge ” shall include

justices, judges of the Superior Court, judges of the Commonwealth Court,

judges of the Courts of Common Pleas, judges of the Philadelphia Municipal

Court, and magisterial district judges, but shall not include lawyers and non

lawyers performing judicial functions, including but not limited to masters and

arbitrators, for the Unified Judicial System.

In accordance with this Orde r

, the Comments to Rule 3.11 of the Code of

Judicial Conduct and Rule 3.11 of the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of

Magisterial District Judges are promulgated as set forth in Annex A

.

To the extent that notice of proposed rulemaking would be required by

Rule 103 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Judicial Administration or otherwise, the

immediate amendment of the Code of Judicial Conduct and Rules Governing

Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges is hereby found to be

required in the in terest of justice and efficient administration.

This Order shall be effective on September 1, 2020

, and shall be processed

in accordance with Rule 103(b) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Judicial

Administration.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Industrial Minerals Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert Dinning, Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

March 30, 2009                    /s/ Robert Dinning
--------------                    -----------------------
                                     Robert Dinning
                                  Chief Financial Officer
#### MELANSON v. O’BRIEN.

Misc. Civ. No. 51-4.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

Feb. 1, 1951.

*165Elmer A. Melanson, pro se.

No attorney for defendant.

SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

Since my memorandum of January 25, 1951, denying the writ of habeas corpus in this case, 95 F.Supp. 230, I have received from the applicant a letter dated January 29, 1951, together with an enclosure and a brief. For the purpose of appeal the letter and enclosure are designated as part of the record.

Upon the receipt of the brief I again reviewed this case in the light of the Supreme Court cases mentioned therein, but a'rrive at the same conclusion, namely, that the writ of habeas corpus should not issue. This case seems to come within the ruling of the Supreme Court in Betts v. Brady, Warden, 316 U.S. 455, 62 S.Ct. 1252, 86 L.Ed. 1595. That case is even stronger, for the petitioner there, who was being tried on a charge of robbery, asked the Court to designate counsel for him because he had no funds with which to hire an attorney. The Court did not grant this request, and the petitioner was tried and sentenced to a term of eight years. While serving his sentence he applied for a writ of habeas corpus. The writ issued, the cause was heard, and his contention was rejected. In that case, 316 U.S. at page 473, 62 S.Ct. at page 1262, the Supreme Court said that: “ * * * the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the conviction and incarceration of one whose trial is offensive to the common and fundamental ideas of fairness and right, and while want of counsel in a particular case may result in a conviction lacking in such fundamental fairness, we cannot say that the amendment embodies an inexorable command that no trial for any offense, or in any court, can be fairly conducted and justice accorded a defendant who is not represented by counsel.”

In the instant case there is no allegation in the application that the Court as a Court did anything which could be considered as unfair conduct of the trial, or which interfered with this applicant’s •constitutional rights; nor is there any allegation that the trial without counsel was unfair because of the ignorance, youth, or other incapacity of the applicant.

Acting upon the request of the applicant as it appears in the last paragraph of his letter of January 29, 1951, the Clerk of this Court is instructed to record the applicant’s “Notice of Intention to Appeal” to the United States Court of Appeals.
#### SUCCESSION OF Edward LOTT, Jr.

No. 2011-CC-0133.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

In re Lott Jr., Succession of Edward; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. D, No. 06-12300; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-C-1509.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7162 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7162

                    For the relief of David Beasley.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2018

  Mr. Nolan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of David Beasley.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE CONNECTION FOR ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS 
              WITH REGARDS TO DAVID BEASLEY.

    With regards to David Beasley, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
shall treat ankylosing spondylitis as a disease specified in section 
1116(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           9,556
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              95
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,950
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     43,258
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,793
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             6,800
<LOANS>                                        175,954
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,757
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 246,595
<DEPOSITS>                                     217,506
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,166
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,195
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,344    
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 246,595
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,890
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,059
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   296
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,245
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,238
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,375
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,870
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      447
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (67)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,400
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,400
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,413
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.34
<LOANS-NON>                                        732
<LOANS-PAST>                                       109
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     51
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,618
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      355
<RECOVERIES>                                        47
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,757
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,546
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            211
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kevin Hershberger, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of ReWalk Robotics Ltd.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





/s/ Kevin HershbergerKevin HershbergerChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)




Date: February 27, 2015
Slip Op. 00-101

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

_________________________________

:

SKF USA INC. and SKF GmbH, :

:

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. : Court No. 99-08-00473

:

UNITED STATES, :

:

Defendant, :

:

THE TORRINGTON COMPANY, :

:

 Defendant-Intervenor :

_________________________________:

JUDGMENT

This Court having received and reviewed the United States

Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s

(“Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court

Remand, SKF USA Inc. v. United States, 24 CIT ___, Slip Op. 00-

28 (March 22, 2000) (“Remand Results”), Torrington’s comments to

the Remand, and Commerce having complied with the Court’s

remand, and no other responses to the Remand Results having been

submitted by the parties, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on June 20,

2000 are affirmed in their entirety; and it is further

ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this

case is dismissed.

 _________________________________

 NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

 SENIOR JUDGE

Dated: August 18, 2000

New York, New York
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Certification of Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Richard M. Gomberg,certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of iVOW, Inc.

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.               Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b.              Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

c.               Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.               Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b.              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: March 31, 2006

 

 
| /s/  Richard M. Gomberg     |       |
|-----------------------------|------------|
| **Richard M.  Gomberg**     |       |
| **Chief Financial Officer** | ** ** |

 

----
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7210 

To direct the Director of the United States Geological Survey to establish 

a program to map zones that are at greater risk of sinkhole formation, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2018 

Mr. SOTO (for himself, Mr. CURBELO of Florida, Mr. CRIST, and Mrs. MURPHY of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Director of the United States Geological Survey 

to establish a program to map zones that are at greater 

risk of sinkhole formation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sinkhole Mapping Act 

5 of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SINKHOLE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the United States 

8 Geological Survey shall establish a program to— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 7210 IH

1 (1) study the short-term and long-term mecha2 nisms that cause sinkholes, including extreme storm 

3 events, prolonged droughts causing shifts in water 

4 management practices, aquifer depletion, and other 

5 major changes in water use; and 

6 (2) develop maps that depict zones that are at 

7 greater risk of sinkhole formation. 

8 (b) REVIEW OF MAPS.—Once during each 5-year pe9 riod, or more often as the Director of the United States 

10 Geological Survey determines is necessary, the Director 

11 shall assess the need to revise and update the maps devel12 oped under this section. 

13 (c) WEBSITE.—The Director of the United States 

14 Geological Survey shall establish and maintain a public 

15 website that displays the maps developed under this sec16 tion and other relevant information critical for use by com17 munity planners and emergency managers. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.8.1

                              NSTAR
                    1997 Share Incentive Plan

        AMENDMENT TO THE NSTAR 1997 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN


Pursuant to Section 17 of the NSTAR 1997 Share Incentive Plan,
NSTAR hereby amends said Plan, said amendment to become effective
upon approval thereof by the Shareholders of NSTAR, as follows:

Section 4(a) of the Plan is amended by deleting the number
"2,000,000" and inserting in lieu thereof the number "4,000,000."

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, NSTAR has caused this instrument of Amendment
to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 24th day of
January 2002.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                     <C>    <C>

                                NSTAR


                         By:    /s/  Thomas J. May
                                Name:  Thomas J. May
                                Title: Chairman, President and
                                       Chief Executive Officer

</TABLE>