alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at June 30, 1999 (unaudited) and Statements of Income for the
three months ended June 30, 1999 (unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       5,788,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,047,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,807,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                (1,040,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,596,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,596,000
<PP&E>                                       4,686,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,403,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,582,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,829,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,842,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,601,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,582,000
<SALES>                                     11,223,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,223,000
<CGS>                                        6,959,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,959,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,833,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,620,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   604,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,016,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,016,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1491

EUGENE HORTON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, formerly

known as Norfolk Southern Corporation,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-1247-1)

Submitted: October 8, 1999 Decided: October 19, 1999

Before HAMILTON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Romallus O. Murphy, Sr., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant.

M. Daniel McGinn, Jennifer K. Van Zant, BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON,

HUMPHREY & LEONARD, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Horton, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging that he was denied benefits from

his former employer because of his race. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the

district court, finding that Horton’s action is barred by his execution of a valid and comprehensive release. See Horton v. Norfolk

Southern Railway Co., No. CA-97-1247-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 1999). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brett D. Davis, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2014-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.             I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

 

----

 
| March 29, 2017 |   |
|---------------------|--------|
|                |   |
|                | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis |
|                | Name:  | Brett D. Davis |
|                | Title: | President (senior   officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Thefollowing certification is furnished pursuant to the requirements of theSecurities and Exchange Commission and shall not be deemed “filed” for thepurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section.  Such certification shall not be deemedincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that such certificationis specifically incorporated by reference by the registrant.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Metro One Telecommunications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Timothy A. Timmins,Chief Executive Officer and Duane C. Fromhart, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   August 9,  2005 |   | /s/ Timothy A. Timmins     |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|                                        |   | Timothy A. Timmins         |
|                                        |   | President, Chief Executive |
|                                        |   | Officer                    |
|                                        |   |                       |
|                                        |   |                       |
|                                        |   | /s/ Duane C. Fromhart      |   |
|                                        |   | Duane C.  Fromhart         |
|                                        |   | Senior Vice  President,    |
|                                        |   | Chief  Financial Officer   |
|                                             |        |                            |        |  |

 

1

----
Exhibit 4.18









Affimed GmbH - Im Neuenheimer Feld 582 - 69120 Heidelberg



Perceptive Credit Opportunities Fund, LP
Attn.: Joseph Edelman
499 Park Avenue, 25th Floor
New York, New York 10022
United States of America



April 29, 2015



Affimed Loan Agreement: Amendment to
include Affimed Inc. as member of the Group



Dear Mr. Edelman,



As discussed by email between Sandeep and me, Affimed GmbH intends
to grant upfront financing (contribution to equity) to Affimed Inc., c/o Morris & Morris, P.C., 32 Kearney Road, Needham Heights,
MA 02494, a wholly owned subsidiary of Affimed GmbH, in an amount of USD 100,000. We agreed that Affimed GmbH may provide the aforementioned
funding to Affimed Inc., if the Term Facility Agreement between Affimed GmbH and Perceptive Credit Opportunities Fund, LP is amended
as to also include Affimed Inc. as a member of the Group.



We hereby agree that Affimed Inc. shall be considered a member
of the Group under the Term Facility Agreement dated July 28, 2014 as defined in Section 1.1 thereof as well as a member of the
Group under the Global Assignment Agreement dated July 28, 2014 as defined in Section 1.1 thereof, provided however that any additional
funding of Affimed Inc. by another member of the Group requires prior approval of the Lender.



As a sign of your agreement, please return a duly executed copy
of this letter to us by either fax to +49 6221 65307 77 or by overnight courier.



|Affimed GmbH
        
        /s/ Florian Fischer | /s/ Michael Wolf           
|------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------
|Florian FischerChief Financial Officer            | Michael WolfHead of Finance







|Agreed:
        Perceptive Credit Opportunities Fund, LP
        By: Perceptive Credit Opportunities GP, LLC, its general partner
        
        /s/ Joseph Edelman | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Joseph EdelmanChief Executive Officer & Portfolio ManagerDate: April 30, 2015                                                                                         |
#### FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NEW ORLEANS v. Terry WILLOUGHBY, et al.

No. 2011-CC-2367.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Terry Willoughby d/b/a Powers Roofing and Siding Company; Willoughby, Terry; — Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/ Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. M, No. 10-12669; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-C-1318.

Denied.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR K

ENT COUNTY
STATE HUMAN RELATIONS : COMMISSION ex rel . THEODORA : C.A. No: K13C-01-007 RBY BUTLER : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : MARY FIELD and

DELAWARE : COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT, LLC, : : Defend ants. :
Submitted: November 19, 2014 Decided : January 14

, 2015 Upon Consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment

DENIED ORDER
Oliver J. Cleary , Esquir

e, Depa rtment of Justic e, Wi lmingt on, Dela ware f orPlaintiff. Michael P. Mo rton, Esqui re, Greenvill e, Delaware for Defend ants.

Young, J.State Human Rel. Comm. ex. rel. T heodora Butl

er v. Mary

Field, et. al. C.A. No.: K13C-01-007 RBY January 14, 2015

2 DECISION The fac ts and argu

ments presente d in this Moti on are ide ntical to th ose presente d in the Moti on of Plain tiff Green. Ac cordingly , this Moti on is DENIED for the same reaso ns as stat ed in that Order made this same dat e and time. SO ORDERED this 14 th day of January , 2015.
/s/ Rober

t B. Youn g J. RBY /l mc oc: Prothonotary cc: Counsel Opinion Di stribution File
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,190
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         408,928
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           383,882
<LOANS>                                      1,153,490
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,636,097
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,039,873
<SHORT-TERM>                                   137,800
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             21,858
<LONG-TERM>                                    326,514
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,636,097
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 20,073
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,555
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    14
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                27,642
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,479
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,114
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,528
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      210
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,156
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,323
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,323
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.05
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,287
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    981
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,363
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        6
<RECOVERIES>                                        37
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,604
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,604
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
#### BROWARD COUNTY, Appellant, v. Gregoire CIDOINE, Appellee.

No. 4D09-2381.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 19, 2011.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 22, 2011.

Jeffrey J. Newton, Broward County Attorney, James D. Rowlee, Senior Assistant County Attorney, Andrew J. Meyers, Chief Appellate Counsel, and Benjamin R. Salzil-lo, Assistant County Attorney, Fort Laud-erdale, for appellant.

Nancy Little Hoffmann of Nancy Little Hoffmann, P.A., and Robert J. McFann of McFann & Beavers, P.A., Fort Lauder-dale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*Affirmed. See Sossa v. Newman,*647 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

POLEN, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
#### Miguel J. Matos, Appellant, v Anthony Scoppetta, Respondent.

[775 NYS2d 144]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dianne T. Renwick, J.), entered April 4, 2003, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision, granted defendant’s motion to renew plaintiffs prior motion for partial summary judgment, and, upon renewal, denied the motion, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s excuse for not submitting an affidavit of merit in *330opposition to plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment is that he relocated to Florida some three weeks before the motion was made, and failed to advise his attorney thereof until at or about the time the motion was decided some three weeks after it was submitted. While defendant should have kept in closer contact with his attorney, we are satisfied that his failure to do so was inadvertent, and, given a short delay that resulted in no prejudice, renewal was properly granted *(see Diaz v New York Downtown Hosp.,*262 AD2d 62 [1999]; *Cespedes v McNamee,*308 AD2d 409 [2003]). On the merits, an issue of fact as to plaintiffs fault is raised by defendant’s assertion that the accident occurred when plaintiffs vehicle cut in front of his vehicle (*see Singh v Sanders,*286 AD2d 256 [2001]). Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan and Gonzalez, JJ.
### I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-89,505-01
IN RE KEITH EDWARD HENDRICK S, Relator
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NOS. 1438707-A AND 143708- A IN THE 178th DIS TRICT COURT F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Relator has filed a motion for le ave to f ile an applica

tion for a writ of m andamus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. In it, Relator contends that he filed applications for a writ of habea s corpus in the 1 7 8th District Court of Har ris County , the District Court enter ed a timely order desig natingissues on J une 4, 2018, more than 180 day s have passed since the date the State
rec eived the applications, and the applications have not been timely forwa rded to this C o u rt as mandated by

Texas Rule of Appellate Proc edure 73.4(b)( 5). Respondent, the District Clerk of Har ris County , is order ed to file a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus applications, submitt ing proof of the date of
rec eipt by the State showing 180 day s has n o t y et elapse d, or stating that Relator has not filed2

applications for a writ of habeas corpus in Har ris County
. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until R espondent ha s submitt ed the a ppropriate response . Such response shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: F ebrua

ry 27, 2019 Do not publish
No. 26.

#### Boyd and others, plaintiff’s in error *vs.*Ham, defendant in error.

[1.] Where the transcript of the record was certified and sent up from the Court below, and was on file in the Clerk’s office of the Supreme Court, on the first day of the term to which the case was returnable, and no assignment of errors was filed on that day or before, the case was dismissed.

Error to the Superior Court of the County of Merriwether.

No appearance on the part of the plaintiffs in error.

O. Warner, for the defendant in error,

moved to dismiss the writ of error.

It appeared that the transcript of the record in the cause had been certified and sent up from the Court below, and was on file in the Clerk’s office of the Supreme Court, on the first day of the term; and that the plaintiffs in error had failed to file an assignment of errors in the cause, as required by the xxni Rule of Court.

Per Curiam.

Ordered, therefore, that the writ of error in the cause be dismissed, and the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
# National Public Lands Day, 2010 

From majestic mountain ranges to beloved neighborhood parks, Americans enjoy the natural places our ancestors have celebrated and protected for centuries. Our public lands represent the American spirit and reflect our shared experience—our history, our culture, and our deep love for wild and beautiful places. Every September, thousands of Americans volunteer their time and talents to protect our parks, national forests, wildlife refuges, and other public lands. National Public Lands Day is an occasion to join together in honor of our Nation’s unique natural treasures.

Every year, Americans take this opportunity to conserve and restore our public places. Last year, an estimated 150,000 dedicated volunteers removed litter and invasive plants; cleaned water resources; built and maintained trails; and planted trees, shrubs, and other native plants. This year, I encourage even more Americans to volunteer in local projects to have a greater impact on parks and public lands across our Nation.

Taking care of our public lands is and must continue to be a proud American tradition. In April, I hosted the White House Conference on America’s Great Outdoors to address challenges and opportunities surrounding conservation today, and to identify new ways to work together to preserve our natural bounty. I also inaugurated the America’s Great Outdoors Initiative to build a conservation agenda for the 21st century, and to reconnect Americans to our great outdoors. To do this, I instructed my Administration to participate in listening sessions around the country to hear Americans’ concerns, and to learn about what citizens and communities are doing to safeguard our land, water, and wildlife, as well as places of historic and cultural significance. As a Nation, we must engage in a new conversation about the conservation of the cherished places that have helped define us.

On this day of service and celebration, I encourage all Americans to give their time and energy to care for—and to go out and enjoy—our public lands. Together, we can build upon our history of stewardship so our unique landscapes are preserved for countless generations to come.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 25, 2010, as National Public Lands Day. I invite all Americans to join me in a day of service for our public lands.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fourth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 2010-24646

Billing code 3195-W0-P
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S
O F T E X A S

N O

. W R

- 8 1
, 8 7 2

- 0 1

E X P A R T E G E O R G E W A Y N E S M I T H
, A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N F O R W R I T O F H A B E A S C O R P U S

C A U S E N O

. C

- 1 9
, 0 5 7

- A I N T H E 1 7 3 R D D I S T R I C T C O U R T

H E N D E R S O N C O U N T Y

P R IC E , J

. , f

i l e d a c o n c u r r i n g s t a t e m e n t

.

C O N C U R R I N G S T A T E M E N T

I a g r e e t h a t t h e a p p l i c a n t ’ s s e c o n d c l a i m , c o m p l a i n i n g o f t h e e r r o n e o u s a s s e s s m e n t o f

a t t o r n e y f

e e s , i s n o t c o g n i z a b l e b y w a y o f a n a p p l i c a t i o n f o r w r i t o f h a b e a s c o r p u s

. I t s h o u l d

b e d i s m i s s e d

. I w r i t e s e p a r a t e l y s i m p l y t o n o t e t h a t t h e a p p l i c a n t m a y o b t a i n r e l i e f f r o m t h o s e

f e e s b y r a i s i n g t h i s c l a i m i n a n a p p l i c a t i o n f o r w r i t o f m a n d a m u s , a s w e h a v e p r e v i o u s l y h e l d

t h a t “ q u e s t i o n s o f t h e v a l i d i t y o f o r d e r s e n t e r e d u n d e r [ A r t i c l e 2 6

. 0 5 ( g )

, C o d e o f C r i m i n a l

P r o c e d u r e ]

. . . c o n s t i t u t e ‘ c r i m i n a l l a w m a t t e r s ’ f o r p u r p o s e s o f o u r m a n d a m u sSMI TH — 2

j u r i s d i c t i o n [

. ] ” 1

F I L E D : S E P T E M B E R 1 7

, 2 0 1 4

D O N O T P U B L I S H

1

In re Daniel

, 396 S.W .3d 545, 54 8 (T ex

. C ri m. App. 2013); see also T E X

. C O D E C R I M

. P R O C

. art. 26.05(g ) (deta iling the circ umstances under which a defe ndant may be order ed to pay the
“cost of the leg al servic es provided” to him by his appointed counsel)

.