alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Calbert Clay CHARLES, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 8028.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 16, 1960.

Decided April 25, 1960.

Charles W. Laughlin, Richmond, Va. (Court-appointed counsel), for appellant.

Calbert Clay Charles, pro se, on brief.

Hugh E. Monteith', Asst. U. S. Atty., Sylva, N. C. (J. M. Baley, Jr., U. S. Atty., Asheville, N. C., on brief), for appellee.

Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, HAYNESWORTH, Circuit Judge, and BUTLER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Calbert Clay Charles, who appeals from the dismissal of his petition brought under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, is under, sentence for causing forged checks to be transported in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2314, and *463falsely representing himself to be a Security Investigator for the United States Army in violation of 18 U.S.CA. § 912. The District Judge wrote a long, detailed statement of his reasons for dismissing the petition without a hearing. We find no error.

It was called to our attention in the oral argument that the date on the federal warrant, written in ink, appears to have been changed from November 8 to November 9. However, in his brief, defendant admits that he was in state custody on November 7, 1958, when he made admissions to federal officers. There is neither a claim nor evidence in the record that defendant made further admissions to federal agents on either November 8 or November 9 before being taken to the United States Commissioner. Thus, the date of execution of the warrant has no significance, and there is no possible question of the violation of Rule 5(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A.

Affirmed.
#### Billie G. SEMMES and Garrett Motor Cars, LLC v. Henry KLEIN.

No. 2011-C-1931.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

In re Garrett Motor Cars LLC; Semines, Billie G. et al.; — Plaintiffs); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. G, No. 2008-8233; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-1734.

Denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
       As ADOPTED PURUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aquis Communications Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Brian M. Bobeck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

            1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.





This Certification is executed as of May 12, 2004
                                                /s/ Brian M. Bobeck
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Name:  Brian M. Bobeck
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                                Aquis Communications Group, Inc.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Aquis Communications Group, Inc. and will be retained by Aquis
Communications Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       -22-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Genomic Medicine Program Advisory Committee will meet on October 22, 2010, at the Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC. The meeting will convene at 9 a.m. and adjourn at 5 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice and make recommendations to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on using genetic information to optimize medical care of Veterans and to enhance development of tests and treatments for diseases particularly relevant to Veterans.

The Committee will receive program updates from the VA program staff; continue to discuss optimal ways for VA to incorporate genomic information into its health care program while applying appropriate ethical oversight and protecting the privacy of Veterans; and receive updates on genomics initiatives within Patient Care Services; efforts to increase genetics education among VA Nursing Staff; and VA's latest efforts to improve its electronic medical records system.

                    Public comments will be received at 3 p.m. Public comments will be limited to five minutes each. Individuals who speak are invited to submit 1-2 page summaries of their comments at the time of the meeting for inclusion in the official meeting record. Any member of the public seeking additional information should contact Dr. Sumitra Muralidhar, Designated Federal Officer, at                     *sumitra.muralidhar@va.gov*                     or (202) 461-1669.                

Dated: September 30, 2010.

By Direction of the Secretary.

Vivian Drake,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-25062 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
#### MOREL G. LEMOINE DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. Shirley G. SOPRANO d/b/a Gino’s Exxon.

No. 2011-CC-1915.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

In re Morel G. Lemoine Distributors, Inc.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Pointe Coupee, 18th Judicial District Court Div. C, Nos. 33,520, 34,173; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 CW 0801.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant.
No. 13,581.

#### Bundy *v.*Williams.

Filed March 30, 1889.

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

*L. H. Reynolds*and *W. A. VanBuren,*for appellant.

*E. Marsh*and *W. W. Cook,*for appellee.

Mitchell, J.

The reasons upon which the judgment was affirmed in *Bundy*v. *McClarnon, ante,*p. 165, require an affirmance of the judgment in the present ease.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST

CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



---

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liberty Property Trust (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, in connection with Rule , that based on my knowledge:

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR.George J. Alburger, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 12, 2003
##### 



Exhibit
10.46
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED SUBORDINATED CREDIT AGREEMENT
 Amendment th Borrower Brigham Exploration General Partner Lenders Agent
 W I T N E S S E T H:
 Credit
Parties Original Agreement Guarantors
   ARTICLE I.
DEFINITIONS AND REFERENCES
 Defined Terms
 Credit Agreement




---



##### 



ARTICLE II.
AMENDMENTS
 Definitions
  NPV
     Gas Strip Price




---



##### 



Oil Strip Price Alternate Gas Price Alternate Oil Price
 Section 1.01
 Second Amendment
 ARTICLE III.
CONDITIONS TO EFFECTIVENESS OF THE AMENDMENT
 Effective Date




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV.
MISCELLANEOUS
 Ratification of Agreements
 Survival of Agreements; Representations and Warranties




---



##### 



Subordinated Loan Documents
 GOVERNING LAW
 Counterparts
 THIS AMENDMENT AND THE OTHER SUBORDINATED LOAN DOCUMENTS REPRESENT THE FINAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE PARTIES AND MAY NOT BE CONTRADICTED BY EVIDENCE OF PRIOR, CONTEMPORANEOUS, OR SUBSEQUENT ORAL
AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES. THERE ARE NO UNWRITTEN ORAL AGREEMENTS AMONG THE PARTIES HERETO.




---



##### 



BRIGHAM OIL & GAS, L.P.By:
    
    /s/ Eugene Shepherd, Jr.Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr.Executive Vice President & Chief Financial OfficerBRIGHAM EXPLORATION COMPANYBy:
    
    /s/ Eugene Shepherd, Jr.Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr.Executive Vice President & Chief Financial OfficerBRIGHAM, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Eugene Shepherd, Jr.Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr.Executive Vice President & Chief Financial OfficerTHE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND plc,
as Agent and LenderBy:
    
    /s/ Phillip BallardPhillip BallardManaging Director
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2483]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 10674-015]

NewPage Wisconsin System Inc., Kaukauna Utilities; Notice of 
Application for Transfer of License and Soliciting Comments and Motions 
To Intervene

January 29, 2010.
    On January 25, 2010, NewPage Wisconsin System Inc. (transferor) and 
Kaukauna Utilities (transferee) filed an application for transfer of 
license of the Kimberly Project No. 10674 located on the Fox River in 
Outagamie County, Wisconsin.
    The transferor and transferee seek Commission approval to transfer 
the license for the Kimberly Project from the transferor to the 
transferee.
    Applicant Contacts: For transferor: Ronald O. Guay, NewPage 
Wisconsin System Inc., 35 Hartford Street, Rumford, ME 04276, (937) 
369-2932, and Amy S. Koch, Patton Boggs LLP, 2550 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20037, (202) 457-5618. For transferee: Mike Pedersen, 
Kaukauna Utilities, 777 Island Street, Kaukauna, WI 54130, (920) 766-
5721, and Nancy J. Skancke, Law Offices of GKRSE, 1500 K St., NW. Suite 
330, Washington, DC 20005, (202) 408-5400.
    FERC Contact: Steven Sachs, (202) 502-8666 or 
[email protected].
    Deadline for filing comments and motions to intervene: 30 days from 
the issuance of this notice. Comments and motions to intervene may be 
filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii)(2009) and the instructions on the Commission's 
website under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed 
electronically, documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an 
original and eight copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, 
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. For more information on how to submit these types 
of filings please go to the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project 
can be viewed or printed on the eLibrary link of the Commission's Web 
site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket 
number (P-10674) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-2483 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
A92A0111.

#### GOODWIN v. THE STATE.

(432 SE2d 272)

Decided May 10, 1993.

Pope, Chief Judge.

Our judgment in this case at 204 Ga. App. 209 (419 SE2d 39) (1992) has been reversed by the Supreme Court on certiorari. *Goodwin v. State,*262 Ga. 903 (427 SE2d 271) (1993). Accordingly, our judgment is vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court. The judgment of the trial court is reversed.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Johnson, J., and Senior Appellate Judge John W. Sognier concur.*

*620
      *Russell C. Gabriel,*for appellant.

*Harry N. Gordon, District Attorney, Gerald W. Brown, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.
#### CITY OF QUINCY, Appellant, v. Miles K. WOMACK, Appellee.

No. 1D10-120.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 2, 2011.

Rehearing Denied April 26, 2011.

*1077Karen D. Walker and Gigi Rollini, of Holland *&*Knight LLP, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Fred F. Harris Jr., of Greenberg Trau-rig P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee.

CLARK, J.

The City of Quincy appeals from an order by which the trial court awarded damages to the appellee, upon the City’s breach of contract. In challenging that award the City contends that the appel-lee’s lawsuit was not filed within the limitations time allowed under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes. But the City is calculating that time from its initial breach of a continuing obligation under the contract, and the City’s continuing subsequent breaches provided subsequent dates from which the limitations time may be calculated, with the appellee’s lawsuit having been filed within the limitations period under section 95.11(2)(b) for the continuing breach of the parties’ contract.

The City and the appellee entered into a contract which gave the City water rights in connection with a lake on property owned by the appellee, with the City agreeing to ongoing obligations including continuing maintenance and repairs to an existing dam and spillway. The City later decided that it no longer needed to use the water from the lake on the appellee’s property, and the City further decided that it would cease maintaining and repairing the dam and spillway. That decision was apparently made in February 2003, but the City did not communicate this to the ap-pellee until May 2008, after the appellee contacted the City and complained about the City’s failure to perform the required maintenance and repairs.

The appellee filed his lawsuit against the City in June 2008, and indicated that he had not realized that the City was no longer maintaining the dam until problems arose after heavy rains earlier in 2008. The City interposed a statute of limitations defense, asserting that the five-year limitations period in section 95.11(2)(b) commenced in February 2003 when the City ceased performing its obligations under the contract, and that the appellee’s lawsuit was thus barred as it was not filed within that limitations time. The trial court rejected that assertion, and the City now challenges the trial court’s ruling and *1078the award of damages for the City’s breach of the contract.

In asserting that the limitations period had expired, the City ignores the continuing nature of its obligations under the contract, and that its ongoing nonperformance constituted a continuing breach while the contract remained in effect. The ap-pellee’s cause of action was not limited to the City’s initial breach, and the section 95.11(2)(b) statute of limitations had not expired when the appellee filed his lawsuit which encompassed the City’s continuing breach. *See Bishop v. State, Div. of Retirement,*413 So.2d 776 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). The trial court properly rejected the City’s statute of limitations defense, and the appealed order is affirmed.

KAHN and LEWIS, JJ., concur,
(logo) TORCHLIGHT

LOAN SERVICES

 

 

 

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase CommercialMortgage Securities Trust 2014-C20,

Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates

Series 2014-C20 (the“Trust”)

 

I, Jacob Baron, on behalf ofTorchlight Loan Services, LLC, as special servicer (the “CertifyingServicer”), certify to J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesCorp. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge andintent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

 

I (or Servicing Officers undermy supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities forthe fiscal year 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) and the CertifyingServicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

 

To the best of my knowledge,based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respectsduring the Reporting Period.  

 

Date: March 7, 2017

 

TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC,as Special 

Servicer

 

By: /s/ Jacob Baron 

Name: Jacob Baron

Title: AuthorizedSignatory 

 

475 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY10017

T 212.883.2800 F212.883.2560

Einfo@torchlightloanservices.com

www.torchlightinvestors.com
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

Interiors, Inc.
Computation of weighted average number of shares
outstanding for the three and nine months ended March 31, 1999

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Class A &
                                                      Class B    Shares vs.        Weighted      Weighted
                                                       Common     Note Rec.           Basic       Diluted
                                                        (000)         (000)            (000)         (000)

<S>                                                   <C>           <C>             <C>            <C>
Total Common Shares outstanding at June 30, 1998       21,720
Escrow shares at June 30, 1998                         (6,250)
Common Shares vs. Note Receivable at June 30, 1998       (980)

Class A Common and Class B Common for EPS at
June 30, 1998                                          14,490           980          15,007         15,007

Additional Common Shares                               13,432                         7,693          7,693
Additional Common Shares vs. Note Receivable                          1,475
Stock Options and Warrants                                                                           1,907

Class A Common and Class B Common at March 31,
1999                                                   27,922         2,455          22,700         24,607

Common Shares vs. Note Receivable at March 31,
1999                                                    2,455
Escrow shares at March 31, 1999                             0
Total Common Shares outstanding at March 31, 1999      30,377



<CAPTION>
                                                    Class A &
                                                      Class B    Shares vs.        Weighted      Weighted
                                                       Common     Note Rec.           Basic       Diluted
                                                        (000)         (000)           (000)         (000)

Total Common Shares outstanding at June 30, 1998       21,720
Escrow shares at June 30, 1998                         (6,250)
Common Shares vs. Note Receivable at June 30, 1998       (980)

Class A Common and Class B Common for EPS at
June 30, 1998                                          14,490           980          13,224        13,224

Additional Common Shares                               13,432                         6,047         6,047
Additional Common Shares vs. Note Receivable                          1,475
Stock Options and warrants                                                                          1,392

Class A Common and Class B Common at March 31,
1999                                                   27,922         2,455          19,271        20,663

Common Shares vs. Note Receivable at March 31,
1999                                                    2,455
Escrow shares at March 31, 1999                             0
Total Common Shares outstanding at March 31,           30,377
1999
</TABLE>
** **

**Exhibit 3.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION**

** **

**OF**

** **

**AMERICAN HONDA RECEIVABLES LLC**

 

This Certificate of Formationof American Honda Receivables LLC(the “**Company**”),dated as of March 16, 2011, is duly executed and filed to form a limited liability company in accordance with the Delaware LimitedLiability Company Act (6 Del. C. §18-201, et seq.).

 

1.          Name.The name of the limited liability company is American Honda Receivables LLC.

 

2.          RegisteredOffice.   The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is c/o The Corporation Trust Company,1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.

 

3.          RegisteredAgent.   The name and address of its registered agent for service of process in the State of Delaware is TheCorporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.

** **

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**,the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation of American Honda Receivables LLC as of the 16th day of March, 2011.
Exhibit 21.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                      Subsidiaries of NSTAR



<S>                                         <C>

                                                   State of
                                              Incorporation
BEC Energy                                    Massachusetts
Commonwealth Energy System                    Massachusetts
Boston Edison Company                         Massachusetts
Commonwealth Electric Company                 Massachusetts
Cambridge Electric Light Company              Massachusetts
Canal Electric Company                        Massachusetts
NSTAR Gas Company                             Massachusetts
NSTAR Steam Corporation                       Massachusetts
Hopkinton LNG Corp.                           Massachusetts
Advanced Energy Systems, Inc.                 Massachusetts
Harbor Electric Energy Company                Massachusetts
BEC Funding LLC                                    Delaware
NSTAR Communications, Inc.                    Massachusetts
MATEP, LLC                                         Delaware
NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation              Massachusetts

</TABLE>