alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, George C. Platt, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of
ViewCast.com, Inc. (the Company). This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing
by the Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 (the Report). By execution of this statement, I certify that:  (A)
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and(B)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report. This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement
will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It
is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. May 23, 2005

    /s/ George C. PlattDate

    George C. PlattPresident and Chief Executive Officer 1




---



##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, Laurie L. Latham, is the Chief Financial Officer of ViewCast.com, Inc.
(the Company). This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of
the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Report). By execution of this statement, I certify that:  (A)
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and(B)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report. This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement
will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It
is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. May 23, 2005

    /s/  Laurie L. LathamDate

    Laurie L. LathamChief Financial Officer 2
542 A.2d 206

#### Charles W. Locy, t/a Victorian Lounge, Appellant *v.*Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Appellee.

Submitted on briefs March 24, 1988,

to Judges MacPhail, Colins and McGinley, sitting as a panel of three.

*Norma Chase,*for appellant.

*Faith S. Diehl,*Assistant Counsel, for appellee.

*474June 1, 1988:

Opinion by

Judge McGinley,

The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (Board) entered an order suspending the liquor license issued to Charles W. Locy (Licensee) for five days. After hearing on the statutory appeal to the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, the trial court affirmed the Opinion and Order of the Board. This appeal by Licensee followed.

The facts are not in dispute. A Board investigation commenced on April 8, 1984, and was completed on June 13, 1984. A violation notice was sent by certified mail to Licensee on June 15, 1984, and returned to Board, because of an incorrect zip code on Saturday, June 30, 1984, as “unclaimed.” A Board officer personally served Licensee with a copy of the notice on Monday, July 2, 1984, more than ten days after the investigation was completed.

Section 471 of the Liquor Code (Code), 47 PS. §4-471,1
      *as amended*by Section 2 of the Act of January 13, 1966, PL. (1965) 1301, added the following:

> No penalty provided by this section shall be imposed by the board or any Court for any violations provided for in this act unless the enforcement officer or the board notifies the licensee of its nature and of the date of the alleged violation within ten days of the completion of the investigation which in no event shall exceed ninety days. ....

Recognizing the untimeliness of the notice the Board refers us to another section of the Code which states:

> This act shall be deemed an exercise of the police power of the Commonwealth for the protection of the public welfare, health, peace and *475morals of the people of the Commonwealth . . . and all of the provisions of this act shall be liberally construed for the accomplishment of this purpose.

Section 104 of the Code, PS. §1-104. However, even a liberal construction of the Act does not allow a misinterpretation of its clear and specific language.

The intent of the legislature, obviously, was that Licensee receive timely notice. The language used is unambiguous. On this record we cannot find that the Board has complied with the notice requirement. The suspension must be vacated.

Order

And Now, this 1st day of June, 1988, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County is reversed and the penalty of suspension imposed by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board is vacated.

Act of April 12, 1951, P.L. 90, art. I, §§1-101-9-902.
#### MISSISSIPPI LOUISIANA DIRT COMPANY, L.L.C. v. B AND S EQUIPMENT CO., INC.

No. 2011-CC-0272.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 1, 2011.

In re B and S Equipment Co., Inc.; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs/ Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. P, No. 677-656; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-C-992.

Granted for purposes of remanding to court of appeal for briefing, argument and opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,867
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         306,738
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           306,357
<LOANS>                                        885,790
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,252,387
<DEPOSITS>                                     887,407
<SHORT-TERM>                                    60,392
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             14,850
<LONG-TERM>                                    195,465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,213
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,252,387
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 44,626
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               18,070
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                62,696
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              29,538
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,498
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           24,198
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      481
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 18,019
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,981
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,255
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,255
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.89
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,624
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,317
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,310
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,630
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      398
<RECOVERIES>                                        42
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,755
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,755
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS



The undersigned, as the chief financial officer of Valley Financial Corporation, certify that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, which
accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is
subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).



Dated: May 16, 2005



/s/ A. Wayne LewisChief Financial Officer




38
Exhibit 35.1



AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB



I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby
certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the
“Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and
“Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of May 21, 2014 among the
Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2014-2 Owner Trust, as follows:



| | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2017, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
this 22nd day of May, 2017.



| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7216 

To require the Director of the Court Services and Offender Supervision 

Agency for the District of Columbia and the Director of the District 

of Columbia Pretrial Services Agency to reside in the District of Columbia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 3, 2018 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To require the Director of the Court Services and Offender 

Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia and 

the Director of the District of Columbia Pretrial Services 

Agency to reside in the District of Columbia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RESIDENCY REQUIRE4 MENT FOR DIRECTOR OF COURT SERVICES 

5 AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY AND 

6 DIRECTOR OF PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY. 

7 (a) DIRECTOR OF CSOSA.—Section 11233(b)(1) of 

8 the National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7216 IH

1 Improvement Act of 1997 (sec. 24–133(b)(1), D.C. Offi2 cial Code) is amended by striking the period at the end 

3 of the second sentence and inserting the following: ‘‘, ex4 cept that as a condition of appointment, the Director shall 

5 be a resident of the District of Columbia.’’. 

6 (b) DIRECTOR OF PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY.— 

7 Section 23–1304(b), District of Columbia Official Code, 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘Columbia.’’ and inserting ‘‘Co9 lumbia and who shall be a resident of the District of Co10 lumbia.’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply with respect to each individual who 

13 is first appointed to serve as the Director of the Court 

14 Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District 

15 of Columbia or the Director of the District of Columbia 

16 Pretrial Services Agency (as the case may be) on or after 

17 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
#### Sherman Dwain MILTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D10-5703.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 24, 2011.

Jeffrey E. Lewis, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and Salvatore D. Mollica, Assistant Regional Counsel, Starke, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s “Motion for Delayed Appeal” has been treated by the court as a re*804sponse to our order to show cause questioning the timeliness of the notice of appeal. Inasmuch as the response fails to demonstrate that the notice of appeal was timely filed, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. However, in light of the allegation that appellant timely made his desire for an appeal known to counsel and fault for the unexplained delay in filing of the notice of appeal cannot be attributed to appellant himself, this disposition is without prejudice to the filing of a properly sworn petition seeking belated appeal complying with the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification

I, Colleen B. Brown, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Fisher Communications, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Dated: April 29, 2013



/s/ Colleen B. BrownColleen B. BrownPresident and Chief Executive Officer




1
#### Lendon E. BOSS, Jr., Appellant, v. FLAGSTAR BANK, F.S.B., Appellee.

No. 4D10-1688.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 6, 2010.

*261Thomas E. Ice of Ice Legal, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Asher Perlin of Ben-Ezra & Katz, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee has filed a concession of error based on a case decided after it filed its answer brief. Based on that concession, and on a stipulation with appellant, we reverse the order denying appellant’s motion to quash service of process and remand to the circuit court, where appellee shall have 120 days from the date of the order of remand to effect proper service of process.

GROSS, C.J., FARMER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
ex10-14.htm


    
      

    

    EXHIBIT 10.14

    
      


      

      November 10,
2008

       

      International
Aerospace Enterprises, Inc.:

       

      It was a
pleasure to have you detail out how you intend to bring this project to
completion. It brought back a lot of my Lehmann Brothers days almost a quarter
of a century ago. As I told you on the phone, the cost to ascertain the bridge
loan of approximately $1Million USD will be $15,000. Upon securing these funds,
we will then complete the bridge underwriting. It will take approximately two
weeks after the documentation and funds are submitted to close on the bridge
loan. I am very excited that you are so close to executing this
plan.

       

      KCS
Financial has been serving the commercial underwriting industry for over twelve
years. Our service has been direct to businesses. These businesses have a
history, (thanks to KCS) of providing the finest underwriting in the industry.
By assuring that the underwriting is complete, true and accurate, we can
minimize the time that our lender needs to complete your loan. Our lenders are
active in this ever changing global economy and relationships with the lender
are now more essential than ever to getting business funded. KCS Financial
prides itself with these powerful lender relationships. Our underwriting service
is quickly becoming one of the most sought after services in the financial
markets today.

       

      Our
expertise has allowed the businesses that we have contracted with to grow and
flourish. For years, people have inquired about doing business with KCS
Financial direct. In the beginning of 2007, KCS expanded our operation to
include a "retail store" to allow borrowers to deal direct with us and eliminate
the middleman. It offers the same great service without having to pay
more.

       

      The
bridge loan will be "taken out" by the permanent loan approximately 90 days
after closing/funding of the bridge loan. (The time schedule is also dependant
on all documents, permits and other financial material submitted in a timely
manner, underwriting, site visit, etc.)

       

      I hope
this helps in understanding the timelines and the financial commitment that the
lender will be making to this project. We are very excited to be finally moving
forward on this extraordinary project.

       

      Sincerely,
ci-egorV
Kuczora

       

      Gregory
J. Kuczora, CPC 

      KCS
Financial

      Managing
Director/CEO

       

       

       

      KCS
Financial, Inc. 180 Dickens Trail Ste B Elgin, Illinois 60120
847-742-3475/F847-742-3746

      Email: akuczora
anan,eritech_nnt---- California Area- 925-516-5622
woodds5415a~yahoo.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                             1,340,447
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                        901,984
<ALLOWANCES>                         (26,589)
<INVENTORY>                          207,898
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   2,531,489
<PP&E>                             1,699,034
<DEPRECIATION>                      (736,996)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     4,560,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              1,228,090
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                          14,061,503
<OTHER-SE>                       (10,749,535)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       4,560,858
<SALES>                            5,509,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   5,509,434
<CGS>                                725,894
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        725,894
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   4,369,701
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   (44,907)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      413,839
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  458,746
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         458,746
<EPS-BASIC>                           0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.10



</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. David MATHIS.

No. 2011-KK-0716.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2011.

In re Mathis, David; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of West Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. W-04-3-77; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 0118.

Denied.
#### SUCCESSION OF William C. GAMBEL.

No. 2010-CD-2734.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 21, 2010.

In re Sweeney, Jean M.; —Other; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. N, No. 671-673; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-C-1060.

Stay denied; Writ denied
#### In re Scott M. HAWKINS.

No. 2011-OB-2409.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Hawkins, Scott M.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Reinstatement.

Petition for reinstatement denied. Petitioner may not reapply for reinstatement until at least one year has passed from the date of this judgment. Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24(1).
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0949. IN THE INTEREST OF O. M., A CHILD (MOTHER).

The Appellant in the above-styled case has filed a motion entitled Motion To

Dismiss. The Court construes this as a motion to withdraw the appeal pursuant to

Court Rule 41(g)(1). Said motion is hereby GRANTED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

February 22, 2022

02/22/2022