alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 2013AP1485-D

STATE OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings 

Against Amoun Vang Sayaovong, Attorney at Law:

Office of Lawyer Regulation,

 Complainant,

 v.

Amoun Vang Sayaovong,

 Respondent.

FILED

NOV 18, 2014

Diane M. Fremgen

Clerk of Supreme Court

ERRATA SHEET

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that corrections were made to paragraph 

17 and footnote 5 in the above-captioned opinion which was 

released on July 30, 2014. A corrected electronic version in 

its entirety is available on the court's website at 

www.wicourts.gov. 
No. 2013AP1485-D 

1
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Anthony MORGAN c/w Alvin Bently c/w Frank Magee c/w Dennis Lee c/w Richard Rayford c/w Clyde Brumfield.

No. 2010-KK-1728.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 14, 2011.

In re Morgan, Anthony, et al.; —Defendants; Applying for Rehearing of this Court’s action dated November 19, 2010; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. H, Nos. 271-267, 342-359, 389-832, 371-067, 359-171; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2009-K-1395.

Rehearing denied.
#### Patricia P. ANTLEY and Ricky Antley v. STATE of Louisiana, through the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA SYSTEM.

No. 2010-C-2518.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re Board of Supervisors; State of Louisiana, et al.; University of Louisiana System; —Defendant(s); Applying For *888Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Natchitoches, 10th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 76,880; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-316.

Denied.

GUIDRY, J, would grant.
Order entered January 12, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01222-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.C. AND Q.C., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-01053-2013

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s January 8, 2015 motion for extension of time for filing records 

and briefs TO THE EXTENT that the clerk’s record and reporter’s record shall be filed by 

FEBRUARY 23, 2015. Appellant’s brief will be due thirty days after the later of the date the 

clerk’s record or reporter’s record is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### BILYEU BUCKS, LLC, et al. v. DIRECTECH SOUTHWEST, INC., et al.

No. 2010-CC-2591.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 14, 2011.

In re Bilyeu Bucks LLC et al.; Bilyeu, Mary H.; Bilyeu, Woody D.; —Plaintiff(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Winn, 8th Judicial District Court Div. 0, No. 41292; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 45870-CW, 45913-CW.

Not considered, not timely filed.
#### In re Benjamin *W.*GULICK.

No. 2011-OB-0330.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 25, 2011.

PER CURIAM.*

| ¶ Petitioner, Benjamin W. Gulick, successfully passed the essay portion of the Louisiana Bar Examination. However, the Committee on Bar Admissions declined to certify him for admission to the bar based upon character and fitness concerns relating to his diagnosis of alcohol dependency and his record of drug- and alcohol-related arrests and citations. Petitioner then applied to this court, seeking admission to the practice of law. In 2009, we denied his application, finding that he had not satisfied his burden of proving his good moral character and fitness to practice law. *In re: Gulick,*09-0869 (La.5/15/09), 8 So.3d 555. We further stated that petitioner could not re-apply for admission until he could “demonstrate at least a one-year period of sobriety and compliance with the terms and conditions of his contract with the Lawyers Assistance Program, and in no event less than one year from the date of this judgment.”

In 2011, petitioner filed the instant application, his second seeking admission to the practice of law in Louisiana. In his application, petitioner represents that he has maintained “complete and continuous sobriety” for the last two years. However, he also acknowledges that he has not been in full compliance with his LAP agreement during that time. Specifically, petitioner has failed to timely submit the required written monthly sobriety reports in November 2010, December 2010, and January |22011. He also failed to submit documentation regarding his attendance at AA meetings for those three months. Furthermore, petitioner did not provide written sobriety reports or documentation of AA meetings for the months of January 2010 through June 2010 due to a car accident.

After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude that at this time, petitioner has failed to meet his burden of proving that he has good moral character and fitness to practice law. *See*Supreme Court Rule XVII, § 5(D). Accordingly, it is ordered that the application for admission be and hereby is denied. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XVII, § 9(D)(13), petitioner may not re-apply for admission until he can demonstrate at least a one-year period of compliance with each and every term and condition of his contract with the Lawyers Assistance Program.

ADMISSION DENIED.

3⁄8

 Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors andManagement of

Prudential Asset Resources,Inc.:

 

We have examined management'sassertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance withApplicable Servicing Criteria, that Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for theCommercial Mortgage-Backed Security Transactions - RegAB Portfolio (the"Platform"), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended, excludingcriteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i) (C) & (D), 1122(d)(3)(ii),1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company hasdetermined are not applicable to the activities performed by it with respect tothe Platform. Exhibit C to management's assertion identifies the individualasset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constitutingthe Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with theservicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management'sassertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backedtransactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selectedservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany's compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management'sassertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicableservicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for thePlatform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

  

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 22, 2017

  

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,300 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017*

*T: (646) 471 3000, F: (646)471 8320, www.pwc.com/us*
#### Shaun C. PHILLIPS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-6215.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 10, 2011.

Shaun C. Phillips, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

DAVIS, HAWKES, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
#### Teresa Lynn WILLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D10-2144.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 1, 2011.

Teresa L. Wills, Ocala, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

GRIFFIN, J.

Teresa Lynn Wills [“Wills”] appeals the denial of her motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Wills has raised fifteen claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, one claim of cumulative error and three claims of trial court error. We have painstakingly examined all the claims properly raised under rule 3.850 and find no merit to any.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1420-1421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-249]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 11986 and <greek-i> 11987]


Alabama Disaster <greek-i> AL-00025

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Alabama dated 12/29/2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 12/12/2009 through 12/18/2009.
    Effective Date: 12/29/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/01/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/29/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Escambia.
Contiguous Counties:
Alabama: Baldwin; Conecuh; Covington; Monroe.
Florida: Escambia; Okaloosa; Santa Rosa.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere:..................      5.125

[[Page 1421]]

 
Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere:...............      2.562
Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere:..................      6.000
Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere:...............      4.000
Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere:....      3.625
Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere:.      3.000
For Economic Injury:
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere:........................................
Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere:.      3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11986 6 
and for economic injury is 11987 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are 
Alabama, Florida.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: December 29, 2009.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-249 Filed 1-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [L51010000.FX0000 LVRWB10B4040 LLCAC05000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the extension of the scoping period for the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Walker Ridge Wind Project, Lake and Colusa Counties, California. The BLM published a Notice of Intent to prepare the EIS in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 13, 2010 [75 FR 49517], and in that notice provided for a scoping period to end on September 13, 2010. The BLM now extends the scoping period through October 13, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bethney Lefebvre, telephone (707) 468-4000; address Ukiah Field Office, 2550 North State Street, Ukiah, California 95482; e-mail                         *ukiahwindeis@ca.blm.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Notice of Intent provided for scoping comments on the Proposed Walker Ridge Wind Project to be received through September 13, 2010. The BLM is extending the scoping period to                           ( print page 62137)                        accommodate comment submission after the planned September 9th and September 10th public scoping meetings, and to address the broad public interest in the Project. Scoping comments on the proposed Walker Ridge Wind Project will now be accepted through October 13, 2010.                

Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

Authority:40 CFR 1501.7 and 43 CFR 1610.2.

Thomas Pogacnik,

Deputy State Director, Natural Resources.

[FR Doc. 2010-25360 Filed 10-6-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Nos. 333-30122 and 333-43958) of webMethods, Inc. of our reports dated June 13, 2005 relating tothe financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the referenceto us under the heading “Selected Financial Data” in this Form 10-K.
**/S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP**
McLean, VirginiaJune 13, 2005
#### Mary DOUCET v. FIRST FEDERAL GUARANTY, Heith R. Huguet, John M. Compton, Jr., David Michael Compton, and Sherel J. Pizzolato, Jr.

No. 2011-C-2384.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Huguet, Heith R.; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 643-026; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-CA-9.

Denied.
#### Kevin SLEEM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D11-3392.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 21, 2011.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 10, 2012.

Kevin Sleem, Jasper, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appears to be appealing the denial of a motion for correction or modification of sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). Such orders are not appealable. *Howard v. State,*914 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

*Dismissed.*

POLEN, HAZOURI and CONNER, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 190 (Friday, October 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 60865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24635]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Amendment--
Allegheny Casualty Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 2 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2010 Revision, published July 1, 2010, at 75 FR 38192.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The underwriting limitation for Allegheny 
Casualty Company (NAIC <greek-i>13285), which was listed in the 
Treasury Department Circular 570, published on July 1, 2010, is hereby 
amended to read $1,743,000.
    Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference 
copies of the Treasury Department Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2010 
Revision, to reflect this change.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: September 24, 2010.
Laura Carrico,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-24635 Filed 9-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
#### Steven MATLOCK, et al. v. Andrew RICHARD, et al.

Nos. 10-410, 10-409, 10-411.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Nov. 3, 2010.

Michael W. Campbell, Caffery, Oubre, Campbell & Garrison, L.L.P., Lafayette, LA, for Defendant/Appellee, Robert Bras-seaux, Jr.

Peter Forrestt Caviness, Dauzat, Fal-goust, Caviness & Bienvenu, Opelousas, LA, for Defendant/Appellee, Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.

Edward O. Taulbee IV, Max Michael Menard, Taulbee & Associates, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants/Appellees, Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.

Jeffery F. Speer, Julian Louis Gibbens, III, Doucet & Speer, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiffs/Appellants, Susan Richard, Jenna Richard, Andrew Richard.

Christopher Shannon Hardy, Penny & Hardy, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants/Ap-pellees, Allstate Insurance Company Andrew Richard.

Scott A. Stefanski, Edwards, Stefanski & Zaunbrecher, Crowley, LA, for Plaintiffs/Appellants, Ashley Nero.

J. Bradley Duhe, Ottinger Hebert, L.L.C., Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiffs/Appel-lees, Michelle Matlock, Steven R. Matlock.

Tracey A. Biagas-Hill, Sean P. Rabalais, Attorney at Law, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants/Appellees, Allstate Insurance Company, Encompass Insurance.

Court composed of OSWALD A. DECUIR, J. DAVID PAINTER, and SHANNON J. GREMILLION, Judges.

GREMILLION, Judge.

This case is consolidated with 10-409 and 10-411. For the reasons set forth in *Richard v. Brasseaux,*10-409 (La.App. 3 Cir.11/3/10), 50 So.3d 282, 2010 WL 4320424, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
#### In re Glenda M. AUGUST.

No. 2010-B-1546.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re August, Glenda M.; —Plaintiff; Applying for Rehearing of this Court’s action dated October 15, 2010; to the Office of Disciplinary Board No. 09-DB-019.

Rehearing denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Gregory FREITAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-10092.

D.C. No. CR-99-00419-01-DFL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 15, 2000.1

Decided Jan. 5, 2001.

Before KLEINFELD, MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, and RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

1

. The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM2

This sentencing appeal challenges the district court’s decision to depart upward from offense level twelve and criminal history category IV (range of twenty-one to twenty-seven months) to offense level thirteen and criminal history category V (range of thirty to thirty-seven months) in Steven Gregory Freitas’s sentence for possessing stolen mail and a counterfeit postal service key. The claim is that the court improperly applied factors that relate only to criminal history to his offense level — in effect increasing his offense level without reason. Since the district court’s oral and written rulings reference the harmfulness of Freitas’s conduct, a proper ground for increasing his offense level, his appeal fails.

In its oral ruling, the district court specifically stated that it was adopting the findings and calculations found in the pre-sentence report. These findings and calculations include a recommendation to increase Freitas’s offense level from twelve to thirteen under Sentencing Guidelines § 2B1.1 because the loss used to deter*644mine the total offense level does not fully capture the harmfulness of the conduct. By incorporating the presentence report into its oral ruling, the district court stated a proper reason for increasing Freitas’s offense level.

This conclusion is buttressed by the district court’s written sentencing judgment, which specifically restates that an upward departure in offense level is warranted because the loss used to calculate the offense level under-represents the harmfulness of the conduct.

The sentence imposed by the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6689

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TERRY LEE SHIFFLETT , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. ( 3:99

- cr
- 00042

- GMG

- RWT

- 3 )

Submitted : October 18, 2018 Decided: October 29, 2018

Before DUNCAN , DIAZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Terry Lee Shifflett, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

U npublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Terry Lee Shifflett appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af firm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Shifflett , No. 3:99

- cr
- 00042

- GMG

- RWT

- 3 (N.D.W. Va. June 5, 2018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED