alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25537]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Meeting of the Land Between the Lakes Advisory Board

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Land Between The Lakes Advisory Board will hold a meeting 
on Thursday, November 18, 2010. Notice of this meeting is given under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.2.
    The meeting agenda includes the following:
    (1) Welcome/Introductions
    (2) Environmental Education
    (3) Orientation of New Members
    (4) LBL Updates
    (5) Board Discussion of Comments Received

The meeting is open to the public. Written comments are invited and may 
be mailed to: William P. Lisowsky, Area Supervisor, Land Between The 
Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, Kentucky 42211. Written 
comments must be received at Land Between The Lakes by November 11, 
2010, in order for copies to be provided to the members at the meeting. 
Board members will review written comments received, and at their 
request, oral clarification may be requested at a future meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on November 18, 2010, 9 a.m. to 3:30 
p.m., CST.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Land Between The Lakes 
Administrative Building, Golden Pond, Kentucky, and will be open to the 
public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kylie Urquhart, Advisory Board 
Liaison, Land Between The Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, 
Kentucky 42211, 270-924-2002.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

    Dated: October 5, 2010.
William P. Lisowsky,
Area Supervisor, Land Between The Lakes.
[FR Doc. 2010-25537 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 5887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2521]



[[Page 5887]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 73

[Docket No. FDA-2007-C-0456] (formerly Docket No. 2007C-0245)


Listing of Color Additives Exempt From Certification; Paracoccus 
Pigment; Confirmation of Effective Date

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is confirming the 
effective date of December 17, 2009, for the final rule that appeared 
in the Federal Register of November 16, 2009. The final rule amended 
the color additive regulations to provide for the safe use of 
paracoccus pigment as a color additive in the feed of salmonid fish to 
enhance the color of their flesh.

DATES:  The effective date for the final rule that published in the 
Federal Register on November 16, 2009 (74 FR 58843) is confirmed as 
December 17, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mical E. Honigfort, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-265), Food and Drug Administration, 
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 301-436-1278.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of November 16, 2009 
(74 FR 58843), FDA amended the color additive regulations to add 21 CFR 
73.352 to provide for the safe use of paracoccus pigment as a color 
additive in the feed of salmonid fish to enhance the color of their 
flesh.
    FDA gave interested persons until December 16, 2009, to file 
objections or requests for a hearing. The agency received no objections 
or requests for a hearing on the final rule. Therefore, FDA finds that 
the effective date of the final rule that published in the Federal 
Register of November 16, 2009, should be confirmed.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 73

    Color additives, Cosmetics, Drugs, Medical devices.

0
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
321, 341, 342, 343, 348, 351, 352, 355, 361, 362, 371, 379e) and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and 
redelegated to the Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, notice is 
given that no objections or requests for a hearing were filed in 
response to the November 16, 2009, final rule. Accordingly, the 
amendments issued thereby became effective December 17, 2009.

    Dated: January 22, 2010.
Mitchell A. Cheeseman,
Acting Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 2010-2521 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
867 A.2d 1158

#### IN THE MATTER OF DAVID E. WOLFSON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 00490-1992).

February 28, 2005.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-229, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to *Rule*l:20-14(a)(4), DAVID E. WOLFSON of THORNWOOD, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year based on discipline imposed in the State of New York for multiple instances of gross neglect, lack of diligence, failure to account for client funds, and failure to return client funds promptly, conduct that in New Jersey constitutes violations of *RPC*1.1(a), *RPC*1.3, and *RPC*1.15(a),(b) and (d);

*480And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should be required to practice law under supervision when reinstated to practice in New Jersey;

And respondent having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause issued in this matter;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DAVID E. WOLFSON is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and until the further Order of the Court, effective March 23, 2005; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall not be reinstated to practice in New Jersey unless and until reinstated in New York; and it is further

ORDERED that on reinstatement to practice, respondent’s practice of law in New Jersey shall be under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*l:20-20(c), respondent’s failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of *Rule*l:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent’s petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of *RPC*8.1(b) and *RPC*8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to *Rule*1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

*481ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


<PAGE>





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the amended  periodic  report on Form 10-K/A for the period
ended  December  31, 2004 (the  "Report")  of  Industrial  Minerals,  Inc.  (the
"Company") I, John Melnyk,  Chief Financial Officer,  Secretary and Treasurer of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18USC ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: April 29, 2005

/s/John Melnyk
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Melnyk, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7150 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to continue to apply the 

rule entitled ‘‘Allowing Certain H–4 Dependent Spouses to Apply for 

Employment Authorization’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2018 

Ms. ESHOO (for herself and Ms. LOFGREN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to continue 

to apply the rule entitled ‘‘Allowing Certain H–4 Dependent Spouses to Apply for Employment Authorization’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘H–4 Employment Pro5 tection Act of 2018’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7150 IH

1 SEC. 2. EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION FOR CERTAIN 

2 SPOUSES OF H–1B NONIMMIGRANTS. 

3 The Secretary of Homeland Security may not amend 

4 or repeal the rule entitled ‘‘Allowing Certain H–4 Depend5 ent Spouses to Apply for Employment Authorization’’ (8 

6 C.F.R. 214, 275), and shall continue to apply such rule 

7 as in effect on May 26, 2015. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 906**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Fritsch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ EDWARDJ.FRITSCH                                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward J. FritschPresident and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| November 9, 2007                             |   |
#### Williams E. PETERS, Individually and on Behalf of the Minor Children, Adrian Morgan Brown, and Jacob Ryan Brown v. ALLEN PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, et al.

No. 2010-CC-1880.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 29, 2010.

In re Allen Parish School Board et al.; Louisiana Public School Risk Management Agency; Thompson, Linda; — Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Allen, 33rd Judicial District Court Div. A, No. C-2005-603; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 10-00565.

Denied.

VICTORY and CLARK, JJ., would grant.
A93A0136.

#### PARROTTE et al. v. CHRISTIAN et al.

(432 SE2d 255)

Smith, Judge.

Thomas and Maureen Parrotte appeal the dismissal of their complaints against appellee Bryan D. Christian and uninsured motorist carriers State Farm Mutual Insurance Company and Allstate Insurance Company. The trial court dismissed on the grounds of laches and expiration of the applicable statute of limitation. The accident giving rise to the complaint occurred on August 19, 1989. Plaintiffs filed suit on August 16, 1991 seeking damages for personal injury and loss of consortium. The plaintiffs perfected service on defendant Christian on January 17, 1992 — two years and almost five months after the cause of action arose. Appellees contend that during the lat*824ter five-month period plaintiffs failed to act in a reasonable and diligent manner in attempting to serve Mr. Christian as quickly as possible. *Held:*

Decided June 3, 1993.

*Repasky & Bates, Alexander J. Repasky, Gaye N. Heck,*for appellants.

*Chambers, Mabry, McClelland & Brooks, Clyde E. Rickard III, Ware & Associates, Suzanne T. Fink*for appellees.

1. This court three times ordered counsel for appellant Thomas Parrotte to file an enumeration of error and brief by dates certain. Since he has failed without cause to present either despite repeated orders to do so, this appeal is hereby dismissed as to him pursuant to Court of Appeals Rule 14 (a). *McBride v. Knight,*205 Ga. App. 549 (422 SE2d 675) (1992).

2. The trial court erred in dismissing the loss of consortium claim of Maureen Parrotte. “[I]nsofar as the plaintiff [wife] sought damages for loss of consortium the statute of limitation was four years, and the time had not run. Thus, even though the court determined the plaintiffs had not been diligent in obtaining service upon the defendant the action was not barred by the passage of time.” *Elwell v. Haney,*169 Ga. App. 481, 482 (313 SE2d 499) (1984). See OCGA § 9-3-33.

*Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.*

*Johnson and Blackburn, JJ., concur.*
#### Alex Thomas HUNT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E.E. WRIGHT, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 00-6897.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 2001.

Decided Jan. 17, 2001.

Alex Thomas Hunt, pro se. Eugene Paul Murphy, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appel-lee.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Alex Thomas Hunt seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Hunt v. Wright,*No. CA-99-795-AM (E.D.Va. filed June 5, 2000; entered June 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 99.14

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Industrial  Minerals,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December  31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Edward  Verby,  President  and CEO of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.


        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Edward Verby
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Edward Verby, President/CEO

Dated:  May 13, 2003
#### STATE ex rel. Jeromie Alan BENSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2009-KH-2480.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 29, 2010.

In re Benson, Jeromie Alan; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 05-F3114; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 44,945-KH.

Denied.
Exhibit 11
HMN Financial, Inc.
Computation of Earnings Per Common Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                 Three months ended       Nine months ended
                                       Sept. 30,              Sept. 30,
                                   2000        1999      2000         1999
                                 -------------------    --------------------
<S>                            <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>
Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding
  used in basic earnings
  per common share calculation   3,747,683  4,269,133   3,875,107   4,399,444
Net dilutive effect of:
 Options                           153,543    201,673     127,589     185,251
 Restricted stock awards             1,035     13,630       2,064      20,019
                                 ---------  ---------   ---------   ---------
Weighted average number of
  shares outstanding
  adjusted for effect of
  dilutive securities            3,902,261  4,484,436   4,004,760   4,604,714
                                 =========  =========   =========   =========
Income available to common
  shareholders                $  1,703,442  1,414,960   5,113,295   4,813,307
Basic earnings per common share      $0.45       0.35        1.32        1.09
Diluted earnings per common share    $0.44       0.33        1.28        1.05

</TABLE>
861 A.2d 110

#### IN THE MATTER OF SCOTT L. WISS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 034141991).

November 29, 2004.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that SCOTT L. WISS of MASSAPEQUA PARK, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months effective March 1, 2004, by Order of this Court filed *43September 10, 2004, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

April 19, 2023

No. 04

- 22

- 00901

- CV

IN RE FAIR OAKS COUNTRY STORE, LLC

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

On December 30, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the petition, real parties in interests’ responses, relator’s reply, and this record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is
DENIED

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s Unopposed Motion to Extend or Clarify Time to File Reply Brief is DENIED as moot.

It is so ORDERED on April 19, 2023

.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 19th day of April, 2023

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This p roceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020CI14929 , styled Stacy Marc Barrus as Turnover Receiver for Victor Farias and Integrity Aviation and Leasing, LLC, and Gina Perez, Lisa Aldaco, Olga Perez

- Meredith, Viola Fraga, Elaine Castillo, Susan Perez, and Joann A guilar vs. Fair Oaks Country Store, LLC , pending in the 150th Judicial
District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Rosie Alvarado presiding.
Exhibit 35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 4, 2014
(the Agreement) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2014-2 (the Trust), the issuance of the Notes by
the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the Servicer) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein
shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.

The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller
and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the
fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|    |  |                                         |  |  |  |                      
|--- |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  |  |  | Dated: March 15, 2018
|    |  | Connie Coffey                           |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |  |  |                      
|    |  | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |  |  |
#### STATE ex rel. Harold BULLER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0203.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 14, 2011.

In re Buller, Harold; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Acadia, 15th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 67,176; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW 09-01122.

Writ granted; relief denied.
#### Raymond T. LAMB, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-1697.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 27, 2011.

Raymond T. Lamb, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

*1100PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
EX-10.8





 Exhibit 10.8 

Investcorp Europe Acquisition Corp I (the “Company”) 

Century Yard, Cricket Square 
 Elgin Avenue 

PO Box 1111, George Town 
 Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, KY1-1102 
 Attention: The Directors 

25 October 2021 
 Irrevocable notice of surrender and
transfer of Class B ordinary shares for nil consideration, in accordance with section 37B of the Companies Act (As Revised) of the Cayman Islands and Article 8.4 of the Articles of Association 

Europe Acquisition Holdings Limited, a Cayman Islands exempted company (“Sponsor”), hereby irrevocably surrenders and transfers to the
Company for cancellation and for nil consideration 1,437,500 Class B ordinary shares of a par value of US$0.0001 each standing in its name in the register of members of the Company. 

Sponsor hereby confirms that the Company has not, as at the date of this letter, issued any share certificates to it. 

 

			
	EUROPE ACQUISITION HOLDINGS LIMITED
		
	By:	 	/s/ Rohit Nanda
		 	Name: Rohit Nanda
		 	Title: Director
		
	By:	 	/s/ Ayman Al-Arrayed
		 	Name: Ayman Al-Arrayed
		 	Title: Director