alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Landers *v.*Murphy.

Opinion delivered June 29, 1925.

Constitutional law — impairment op obligation op contract.— Acts 1925, No. 73, creating the office of county supervisor, *held*not void as impairing the obligation of the contract of the county superintendent with the county board of education, under Acts 1919, p. 177, and Acts 1921 p. 532, whether his position as superintendent was a public office, which the Legislature could abolish or one of employment, since the obligation thereof would not be impaired by creating a new office or employment.

Appeal from Poinsett Chancery Court; *J. M. Futrell,*Chancellor;

reversed.

*M. P. Watkins*and *Gautney £ Dudley,*for appellant.

*T. T. Mardis, J. Brmkerhoff*and *L. A. McLin,*for appellee.

McCulloch, C. J.

Appellee is county superintendent of schools in Poinsett County, under selection and contract pursuant to the statutes of the State providing for the management and control of public schools. Act No. 234,1919, p. 177; Act No. 503, 1921, p. 532. He instituted this action against the election officials of Poinsett County to enjoin them from proceeding to hold an election for the office of county supervisor, created by a statute enacted by the General Assembly of 1925. Act No. 73 of the session of 1925, approved Feb. 14, 1925. The *116period of appellee’s contract has not expired, and his contention is that the statute is void, first, because it is in conflict with amendment No. 12 prohibiting the Legislature from enacting local legislation; and second, on the ground that it impairs the obligation of his contract with the County Board of Education.

There is a controversy between the parties as to whether or not the statute assailed in the case is a local statute within the meaning of amendment No. 12, but we have decided today, in the case of *McAdams*v. *Henley, ante*p. 97, that amendment No. 12 was not leg'ally adopted, hence all questions affecting the validity of the present statute, so far as- it is controlled by amendment No. 12, are eliminated from the case. We have, therefore, only to deal with the other questions — whether or not the statute is void for the reason that it impairs the obligation of a contract, and whether the election of appellee to the position of county superintendent under general statutes constitutes him a public officer or merely an employee under contract.

The statute cannot be held to be invalid, for, if the position held by appellee was a public office, the Legislature could abolish it, and, if it was a contract of employment, the obligation thereof was not impaired by creating a new office or employment. *Caldwell*v. *Donaghey,*108 Ark. 60; *Morgan Construction Co.*v. *Pitts,*154 Ark. 420; *Hayes*v. *Port of Seattle,*251 U. S. 233. In any event, appellee’s remedies, if any, for breach of contract are not impaired by the enactment of this statute.

The decree is therefore reversed with directions to dismiss the complaint.

Wood and Humphreys, JJ., dissent.
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2014, by and among CITIGROUPCOMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PARKBRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor, and U.S. BANK NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and Trustee, with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC21 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,094
<SECURITIES>                                    43,419
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,017
<ALLOWANCES>                                       409
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,121
<PP&E>                                           4,077
<DEPRECIATION>                                     817
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,175
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,640
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            93
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,381
<SALES>                                         34,457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,457
<CGS>                                           14,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,891
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,754
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,099
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,655
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .91


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 730 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 730

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to remove limitations on 
  the ability of certain dual citizens from participating in the Visa 
                Waiver Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2017

  Mr. Amash (for himself, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Massie, and Mrs. Dingell) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to remove limitations on 
  the ability of certain dual citizens from participating in the Visa 
                Waiver Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Protection in Travel Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF LIMITATIONS OF CERTAIN DUAL CITIZENS FROM 
              PARTICIPATING IN THE VISA WAIVER PROGRAM.

    Section 217(a)(12) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1187(a)(12)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking 
                `` in subparagraphs (B) and (C)--'' and inserting ``in 
                subparagraphs (B) and (C), the alien has not been 
                present, at any time on or after March 1, 2011--'';
                    (B) in subclause (III) of clause (i), by striking 
                ``; and'' at the end and inserting a period;
                    (C) in clause (i), by striking the matter preceding 
                subclause (I);
                    (D) by striking clause (ii); and
                    (E) by redesignating subclauses (I), (II), and 
                (III) of clause (i) as clauses (i), (ii), and (iii); 
                and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), in the matter preceding clause 
        (i), by striking ``(A)(i)'' and inserting ``(A)''.
                                 <all>
```
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement  dated  as of August 1, 2014, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C22 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

 

(logo) Together we’ll go far
649 A.2d 852

#### IN THE MATTER OF ELLIOTT D. MOORMAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

November 21, 1994.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that ELLIOTT D. MOORMAN of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, and who was by Order of this Court dated March 8, 1994, suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months effective April 1,1994, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately, and it is further

ORDERED that respondent practice under the supervision of a proctor approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics until further Order of this Court, and it is further

ORDERED that respondent pay administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter on a schedule approved by the Disciplinary Review Board.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6279

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RYAN LEE ZATER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-00-626, CA-02-946-3-20)

Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 22, 2003

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ryan Lee Zater, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Lee Zater seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

The order is appealable only if a circuit justice or judge issues

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Zater has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (No 333-27555) pertaining to the1997 Stock Incentive Plan of Journal Register Company of our reportdated March  25, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Journal Register Company, included in theAnnual Report (Form 10-K) of Journal Register Company for the yearended December  26,  2004.

|  | /s/ ERNST& YOUNG LLP |
|--|--------------------------|

MetroPark, NewJerseyMarch  06,2006

----
| (logo) WELLS  

            FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

 

MAC R1204-010

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel: 410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

 

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

200 West Street

New York, New York 10282

 

 

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC22

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

February 24, 2015 

 

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

                    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7304 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7304

To authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to issue Border Wall Bonds, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 13, 2018

 Mr. Harris (for himself, Mr. Gaetz, and Mr. Griffith) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to issue Border Wall Bonds, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BORDER WALL BONDS; BORDER WALL TRUST FUND.

    (a) Authority To Issue Border Wall Bonds.--Section 3102 of title 
31, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following 
new subsection:
    ``(f) Border Wall Bonds.--The Secretary is authorized to issue 
bonds under this section, to be known as `Border Wall Bonds'. The bonds 
authorized by this subsection shall be in such form and denominations, 
and shall be subject to such terms and conditions of issue, conversion, 
redemption, maturation, payment, and rate of interest as the Secretary 
may prescribe, except that no interest shall be payable with respect to 
such a bond before the date that is ten years after the date of the 
enactment of this subsection.''.
    (b) Border Wall Trust Fund.--
            (1) Establishment of trust fund.--There is established in 
        the Treasury of the United States a trust fund to be known as 
        the ``Border Wall Trust Fund'', consisting of such amounts as 
        may be appropriated, credited, or transferred to such Trust 
        Fund as provided in this section or other provision of law.
            (2) Transfers to trust fund.--There are hereby appropriated 
        to the Border Wall Trust Fund amounts equivalent to all 
        revenues derived from the sale and issuance of Border Wall 
        Bonds issued under section 3102 of title 31, United States 
        Code.
            (3) Expenditures from trust fund.--Amounts in the Border 
        Wall Trust Fund shall be available only for purposes of making 
        expenditures to build a physical barrier along the southern 
        border of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

March 16, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00812

- CV

Ken KINSEY, Appellant

v.

AL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI22581 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

A fter receiving a thirty

- day extension, a ppell ee ’s brief was due to be filed March 12

, 2020

. Appellee has filed an unopposed motion requesting a n additional ten

- day extension of time to file appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that appellee’s brief is due no later than March 23 , 2020.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereu nto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of March, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### Larry DONIHOO *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 97-766

968 S.W.2d 626

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered May 21, 1998

*341
      *Charles A. Potter,*for appellant.

*Appellant,*pro se.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant Larry Donihoo’s petition for Rule 37 relief was denied on March 11, 1997, and he filed a notice of appeal from that denial on March 31, 1997. Donihoo’s counsel, Charles A. Potter, sent a transcript of the case which was received by this court’s clerk on July 9, 1997, but counsel failed to file his brief which was due on August 18, 1997. As a consequence, the State filed its motion to dismiss on March 23, 1998, which we granted on April 16, 1998. On April 24, 1998, Donihoo’s counsel, Mr. Potter, moved to set aside our order dismissing the appeal, and in doing so, he conceded it was his responsibility to file a timely brief, but he faded to do so, which caused the dismissal. On May 13, 1998, Donihoo filed a pro se motion asking us to reinstate his appeal.

We grant Donihoo’s and his counsel’s motions, but because Mr. Potter without explanation has delayed nearly nine months in filing a brief, causing dismissal of Donihoo’s appeal, we order Mr. Potter to appear before this court on the 4th day of June, 1998, at 9:00 a.m., to show cause why he should not be held in contempt.

Corbin, J., not participating.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,531
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,794
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    247,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               280,711
<PP&E>                                         116,421
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 413,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          232,968
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        89,508
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,763)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   413,683
<SALES>                                        756,055
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               765,891
<CGS>                                          495,596
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  263,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   176
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (559)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       637
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,196)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,196)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>