alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ralph WARE v. GEMINI INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 10-3.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Nov. 24, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 12, 2011.

Joseph Payne Williams, Williams Family Law Firm, LLC, Natchitoches, LA, for Plaintiff/Respondent-Ralph Ware.

James Alex Mijalis, Lunn, Irion, Salley, Carlisle & Gardner, Shreveport, LA, for Defendant/Applicant-Gemini Insurance Company.

Court composed of ULYSSES GENE THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge, SYLVIA R. COOKS, and ELIZABETH A. PICKETT, Judges.

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

hFor the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of *Ware v. Gemini Insurance Co.,*10-594 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/24/2010), 51 So.3d 179, 2010 WL 4740294, the Gemini Insurance Company’s writ application requesting a summary *185judgment is denied. Costs are assessed to Gemini Insurance Company.

WRIT DENIED.

PICKETT, J., dissents and would grant the writ for the reasons assigned in her dissent in the consolidated appeal.

PICKETT, J.,

dissents and assigns written reasons.

hi would find that Mr. Ware’s employer executed a valid UM coverage form which selected the lower coverage limit of $50,000.00. I do not find that the evidence submitted rebuts the presumption that the lower coverage limits were knowingly and voluntarily selected. I would reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Mr. Ware and the denial of the summary judgment motion filed by Gemini. I respectfully dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary information extracted from the consolidated 
balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations and is qualified in 
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              jun-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                         194,195
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,230,537
<ALLOWANCES>                                   268,000
<INVENTORY>                                    1,622,546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,698,245
<PP&E>                                         1,933,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,148,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,706,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,551,594
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    11,471
<COMMON>                                       7,031
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,239,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,706,307
<SALES>                                        1,517,782
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,517,782
<CGS>                                          956,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  341,169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             112,502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                107,908
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            107,908
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   107,908
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.02
        


</TABLE>
#### Abdul S. MUSA v. LITTON-AVONDALE INDUSTRIES, INC., Avondale Industries, Inc., Avondale Shipyards, Inc., Avondale Enterprises, Inc., ABC Corporation(s), and ABC Insurance Company(s).

No. 2011-C-1256.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 2011.

In re Musa, Abdul S.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 557-885; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-CA-627.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J., would grant.
#### Chris POCHE v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 2010-CC-2217.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 585,544; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 1251.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000738 12-APR-2019 08:03 AM
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, William R. Wolff, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of MakeMusic! Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 10, 2005 By: /s/ William R. Wolff  Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 27, 2015

Order 

Clerk

January 27, 2015

149168-9(65)

DIANE NASH, Personal Representative of the

ESTATE OF CHANCE AARON NASH,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 149168

v COA: 309403

Ottawa CC: 10-002119-NO

DUNCAN PARK COMMISSION,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

DIANE NASH, Personal Representative of the

ESTATE OF CHANCE AARON NASH,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 149169

v COA: 314017

Ottawa CC: 12-002801-NO

DUNCAN PARK TRUST, and EDWARD 

LYSTRA, RODNEY GRISWOLD, and JERRY

SCOTT, Individually and as Trustees of the

DUNCAN PARK TRUST,

Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time to 

file her brief on appeal is GRANTED. The brief will be accepted as timely filed if 

submitted on or before January 30, 2015.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Targeted Genetics
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, H. Stewart Parker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date: April 27, 2005                     /s/ H. Stewart Parker
--------------------                     ---------------------------------------
                                         H. Stewart Parker
                                         President and
                                         Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                          PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the
"Report") of CIMNET(R), Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31,
2005, I, John D. Richardson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                /s/ JOHN D. RICHARDSON
                                                --------------------------------
                                                John D. Richardson
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Principal Accounting Officer

March 31, 2006
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-56961) of Brigham Exploration Company and in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-70137) of Brigham Exploration
Company of our report dated March 6, 1998, except as to Note 11 which is as of
February 27, 1999, which appears on page F-15 of this Form 10-K/A of Brigham
Exploration Company.
 
                                            PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
 
Houston, Texas
February 27, 1999
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jon Eberle, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HMN Financial, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: May 10, 2004                         By /s/ Jon Eberle
                                           Senior Vice President/CFO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7366

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ARTHUR LARON NILES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District 

Judge. (4:01-cr-00198-CWH-1)

Submitted: January 26, 2016 Decided: March 16, 2016

Before WYNN, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Laron Niles, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker 

Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Laron Niles appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012) motion and its order 

denying reconsideration.* We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. United States v. Niles, No. 4:01-

cr-00198-CWH-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 28, 2012; Aug. 18, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * We decline to sua sponte dismiss Niles’ appeal of these 

orders as untimely. Rice v. Rivera, 617 F.3d 802, 810 (4th Cir. 

2010); United States v. Urutyan, 564 F.3d 679, 685 (4th Cir. 

2009); United States v. Mitchell, 518 F.3d 740, 744, 750 (10th 

Cir. 2008).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         242,597
<SECURITIES>                                   264,873
<RECEIVABLES>                                  244,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,150
<INVENTORY>                                    125,142
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               955,313
<PP&E>                                         153,179
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,954
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,149,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          255,630
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           190
<OTHER-SE>                                     894,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,149,900
<SALES>                                        874,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               874,805
<CGS>                                          308,245
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  308,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               703,601
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (17,739)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (119,302)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    52,648
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (171,950)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (171,950)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.92)
        

</TABLE>
Order filed, March 13, 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 01074

- CV

____________ HUBERT BASS , Appellant

V.

MICHAEL W. GILLASPIA JR. D/B/A TEXAS TRU CK SALES , Appellee

On Appeal from the 405th District Court G alveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 18

- CV

- 0709



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due Ma rch 12, 2019

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the cou rt. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Cylena Korkmas , the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 15 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0568

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

JORY JERAE SONGER,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Appellant Jory Jerae Songer was granted an extension of time to file and serve the 

opening brief on or before June 8, 2024. The opening brief is now overdue.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file, and serve the 

opening brief on appeal no later than July 19, 2024. Failure to file the brief within that 

time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 19 2024

06/19/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0568
#### STATE of LOUISIANA v. Robert S. KRODINGER and Michael L. Marshall.

No. 2011-KK-0632.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 28, 2011.

In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. H, No. 487-956; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0052.

Stay denied; writ denied.
y

MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-10-01153-CV

KAREN KRISTINE SILVIO, Appellant

V.

MICHAEL B. NEWMAN, Appellee

Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 945526).

TO THE COUNTY CIVIL COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HARRIS COUNTY, 

GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 8th day of July 2014, the case upon appeal to revise or to 

reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by 

the trial court on July 7, 2010. After submitting the case on 

the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the 

parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains 

no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, Karen Kristine 

Silvio, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 
for observance.

Judgment rendered July 8, 2014.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and 

Brown. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Radack.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

January 2, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of Heritage Worldwide, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jean
Claude  Mas,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that;

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.

/s/  Jean  Claude  Mas
----------------------
Chief  Executive  Officer

November  6,  2003


<PAGE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael BROWN.

No. 2010-KK-2285.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 27, 2010.

In re Brown, Michael; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Assumption, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 10-CR-000001; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 1548.

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.