alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE ex rel. William PECK v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2009-KH-2483.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 29, 2010.

In re Peck, William; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. D, No. 372-794; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2009-K-1222.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Derek Nathaniel MOORE.

No. 2010-K-1304.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re Moore, Derek Nathaniel; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. O, No. 05-07-0341; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KA 2186.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7187 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7187

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 29, 2018

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until December 7, 2018.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Flood Insurance Program 
Further Extension Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. PROGRAM EXTENSION.

    (a) Financing.--Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking ``November 30, 
2018'' and inserting ``December 7, 2018''.
    (b) Program Expiration.--Section 1319 of the National Flood 
Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is amended by striking 
``November 30, 2018'' and inserting ``December 7, 2018''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 10.20

                       WBAE RADIO (PORTLAND, ME) CONTRACT


<PAGE>

             THE GARDEN GUYS 1400 / 1490 THE BAY BROADCAST AGREEMENT

RADIO STATION AGREEMENT
-----------------------
1-Saga Communications of New England, LLC, D/B/A WBAE, 1490 AM and WVAE, 1400
AM/Portland Radio Group will air the Garden Guys ("GG") radio program Sunday
mornings Sam-10am for a 52 week period.
2-The broadcasts shall be exactly 108 minutes and begin exactly at 8:06 am -
9:00 am. Resume 9:06 -10:00 am
3-The "GG" program will be delivered via ISDN which will be covered by the
Administrative Fee listed below.
4- Any changes to the signal delivery, costs will be covered by "GG."
5- The Garden Guys hereby indemnifies and holds Saga Communications of New
England, LLC harmless, from and against any and all claims, damages,
liabilities, costs, and expenses arising out of the broadcast of the program.
6-All information contained within this proposal is proprietary to the Portland
Radio Group and must be kept confidential.
7- Garden Guys owns all commercial inventory between 8am and 10am Sunday
Mornings.

FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENT
---------------------
1-"GG" agree to purchase the complete radio time for the broadcasts on The Bay
for $250 per week for 52 weeks.
2-The agreement will remain in effect pending 90 days written cancellation
notice by either party. .
3-"GG" agrees to a $41 per week administrative fee for 52 weeks. (When the
program moves to satellite and is 100% automated then the administrative fee
will be waived.)

TERM,
-----
1-52 week period (Start Date 3/9/08 End Date 3/8/09)
2-This agreement commences upon signing of both parties and begins upon first
air date. 3-This contract does not automatically renew. If it is agreed by all
parties to continue the "GG" on the Bay, then a new contract will be created to
be signed by all parties.

PROMOTION
---------

1-1400 1490 The Bay will air fifteen (30) second promotional announcements each
week promoting the "GG" show Monday - Saturday 6am-9pm.
2- Advertiser agrees to allow station to make good missed promos during
dayparts/times of greater or equal value.
3- "GG" 468 x 60 banner ad on The Bay station website

AGREED:

Portland Radio Group                    Organic sales and Marketing, Inc.

By: /s/ Warren Maddock  2/27/08         By: /s/ Samuel F. H. Jeffries  2/27/08
    ------------------  -------             -------------------------  -------
    Sales Manager        Date               President and CEO            Date
Presidential Documents

61033 

Federal Register 

Vol. 75, No. 190 

Friday, October 1, 2010 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of September 29, 2010 

Provision of Aviation Insurance Coverage for Commercial Air 

Carrier Service in Domestic and International Operations 

Memorandum for the Secretary of Transportation 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States, including 49 U.S.C. 44302, et seq., I hereby: 

1. Determine that the continuation of U.S. commercial air transportation 

is necessary in the interest of air commerce, national security, and the 

foreign policy of the United States. 

2. Approve the provision by the Secretary of Transportation of insurance 

or reinsurance to U.S. air carriers against loss or damage arising out of 

any risk from the operation of an aircraft in the manner and to the extent 

provided in chapter 443 of title 49 of the U.S. Code until September 30, 

2011, when he determines such insurance or reinsurance cannot be obtained 

on reasonable terms and conditions from any company authorized to conduct 

an insurance business in a State of the United States. 

You are directed to bring this determination immediately to the attention 

of all air carriers, as defined in 49 U.S.C. 40102(a)(2), and to arrange for 

its publication in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 29, 2010 

[FR Doc. 2010–24900 

Filed 9–30–10; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 4910–9–P 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with FRO0OB#1.EPS</GPH>
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S
O F T E X A S

N O S

. W R

- 9 1
, 9 3 6

- 0 3
, - 0 4
, - 0 5
, - 0 6

I N R E T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S E X R E L

. K I M O G G
, R e l a t o r

O N A P P L I C A T I O N S F O R W R I T S O F M A N D A M U S

I N T H E 2 2 8 T H D I S T R I C T C O U R T

F R O M H A R R I S C O U N T Y

H E R V E Y , J

. , f

i l e d a c o n c u r r i n g o p i n i o n i n w h i c h R IC H A R D S O N , N E W E L L , a n d

W A L K E R , J J

. , j o i n e d

.

C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N

P r e s i d i n g J u d g e K e l l e r m i g h t b e c o r r e c t t h a t t h e d e f a u l t r u l e i s t h a t t h e S t a t e c a n n o t

b e c o m p e l l e d t o p r o d u c e w o r k p r o d u c t u n d e r A r t i c l e 3 9

. 1 4 ( a )

. T E X

. C O D E C R IM

. P R O C

.

a r t

. 3 9

. 1 4 ( a )

. B u t t h a t i s n o t t h e w h o l e s t o r y

. A r t i c l e 3 9

. 1 4 ( h ) s p e c i f i c a l l y r e q u i r e s t h e

S t a t e t o d i s c l o s e w o r k p r o d u c t u n d e r c e r t a i n c i r c u m s t a n c e s

. I d

. a r t

. 3 9

. 1 4 ( h ) ( a p p l i e s

n o t w i t h s t a n d i n g a n y o t h e r p r o v i s i o n o f t h e s t a t u t e )

. A r t i c l e 3 9

. 1 4 ( h ) n o t o n l y c o d i f i e s t h e

B r a d y d i s c l o s u r e r e q u i r e m e n t t h a t e x c u l p a t o r y a n d i m p e a c h m e n t e v i d e n c e f a v o r a b l e t o

t h e a c c u s e d m u s t b e t u r n e d o v e r , i t a l s o r e q u i r e s t h e d i s c l o s u r e o f a n y “ m i t i g a t i n gOgg –2

d o c u m e n t

, i t e m , o r i n f

o r m a t i o n i n t h e p o s s e s s i o n , c u s t o d y , o r c o n t r o l o f t h e s t a t e

t h a t

. . . w o u l d t e n d t o r e d u c e t h e p u n i s h m e n t f o r t h e o f f e n s e c h a r g e d

. ” I

d

. ; s e e E x p a r t e

M i l e s , 3 5 9 S

. W

. 3 d 6 4 7

, 6 7 0 ( T e x

. C r i m

. A p p

. 2 0 1 2 ) ( r e c o g n i z i n g t h a t p o l i c e r e p o r t s

c o n t a i n i n g B r a d

y e v i d e n c e m u s t b e d i s c l o s e d b e c a u s e B r a d y s u p e r s e d e s t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f

A r t i c l e 3 9

. 1 4 )

.

W i t h t h e s e c o m m e n t s , I a g r e e w i t h t h e C o u r t t h a t r e l i e f s h o u l d d e n i e d

.

F i l e d : S e p t e m b e r 1 5

, 2 0 2 1

P u b l i s h
HMN FINANCIAL, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date:  May 5, 2010
    
    /s/ Bradley KrehbielBradley KrehbielPresident
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Jon EberleJon EberleSenior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 4.47  Annex 3  To the Cash Pooling Agreement  Act of accession  Polca,5 Place du Champ de Mars, 1050 Brussels, Belgium,  For the attention of the CEO,  Re: Accession to the Polca Cash Pooling Agreement (the Agreement) of Cdiscount (the participating Company)  1.All terms used herein shall have the same meaning as defined in the Agreement.  2.Cdiscount confirms having received and read all the provisions of the Agreement as well as any other information, document considered useful and necessary for the Agreement and its implementation.  3.Cdiscount states to be controlled directly or indirectly by Casino Guichard Perrachon in the sense referred to in the definition of the term Casino Group in Article 1 of the Agreement.  4.Cdiscount confirms having provided Polca with its latest legal financial statements, including financial information on its equity and its financial debts, in accordance with Article 6.2 of the Agreement, on the basis of which the Maximum Amount of Advances is set to 70 million (Seventy million) euros.  5.Cdiscount hereby agrees to be a Participating Company within the meaning of the Agreement, endorses each of the declarations provided for in Article 9 of the Agreement, agrees to be bound without reservation by the terms and conditions of the Agreement, to benefit from all the rights it creates and engages to perform all the obligations imposed upon it.  6.For the purpose of participating in the cash pooling transactions provided for in the Agreement, Cdiscount states that the account No. FR76 3000 3004 2500 0202 8410 917 opened with the Bank should be considered as its Secondary Account for the purposes of the Agreement.  7.We confirm having the authority and capacity to sign the Act of accession to the Agreement.  8.Please note that all correspondence relating to the Agreement will be sent by post, fax, email or telephone to:  ·Antoine Dusart ·120-126, Quai de Bacalan CS 11584  33 067 Bordeaux CEDEX ·Email: antoine.dusart@cdiscount.com ·Telephone: 05 57 14 38 26


For the purposes of Articles 3 and 4 of the Agreement, only the person below or the substitute will exclusively have the capacity and the authority to represent us:  ·Nicolas Woussen ·120-126, Quai de Bacalan CS 11584  33 067 Bordeaux CEDEX  9.As we have negotiated and agreed, we have noted that, for us, the date of entry into force of the Agreement is fixed as August 1, 2014.  For the sake of good order, please return to us one of the two originals of this Annex, with your handwritten signature preceded by the words read and approved.   Kind   regards,Executed   in Bordeaux, on August 1, 2014Cdiscountby   Nicolas Woussen/s/   Nicolas Woussen
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and
as the Chief Financial Officer of Boyd Bros Transportation Inc., respectively,
certify that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, which accompanies this
certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Boyd Bros. Transportation Inc., at the dates and for
the periods indicated. The foregoing certifications are made pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not be
relied upon for any other purpose.

 This the 17th day of May 2004.


                                           /s/ GAIL B. COOPER
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Gail B. Cooper
                                           Chief Executive

                                           /s/ RICHARD C. BAILEY
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Richard C. Bailey
                                           Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Boyd Bros. Transportation Inc. and
will be retained by Boyd Bros Transportation Inc., and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE ex rel. Jacob M. BELL, Sr. v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1503.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 29, 2010.

In re Bell Sr., Jacob M.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 03-07-0332; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. 2009 KW 1816, 2010 KW 0365.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to reconsider, amend or modify to reduce sentence he submitted on or about June 15, 2009 and a motion for preliminary hearing transcript, motion hearing transcripts, trial transcripts and sentencing transcript he submitted on or about January 11, 2010. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motions(s). If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The dis*378trict court is ordered to provide this court with a copy of its judgment.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALEJANDRO FIERRO

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 1 3

- 00 274

- CR

Appeal from the

120 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20120D00748 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State = s third motion for extension of time to file the brief

until July 2 , 201 4

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

THE STATE = S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime Esparza , the State’s Attorney , prepare the

State = s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before J uly 2 , 201 4

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 4 th day of June , 2014

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
648 A.2d 482

#### DONALD R. SIKES, JR., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF ROCKAWAY AND JOHN C. DOLL, JR., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Argued October 11, 1994

Decided October 27, 1994.

*James J. Higgins*argued the cause for appellant *{Boyar, Higgins & Suozzo,*attorneys).

*42*Paul M. Selitto*argued the cause for respondent *(Pitman, Senesky, Nicola & Selitto,*attorneys).

PER CURIAM

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 269 *N.J.Super.*463, 635 A.2d 1004 (1994).

*For Affirmance*— Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

*Opposed*— N one.
#### Joseph F. WELDON, Director of Police of the City of Newark v. Lizzie MILLER, also known as Lizzie Caldwell, Mozelle Hill, as Administratrix of the Estate of Richard Caldwell, the County of Essex and Harry Lerner. United States of America, Intervenor, The County of Essex and Harry Lerner, Appellants.

No. 14769.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued April 20, 1964.

Decided April 30, 1964.

William J. Straub, Newark, N. J. (Nicholas T. Femicola, County Counsel of Essex County, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for defendants-appellants.

Martin G. Holleran, Asst. U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J. (David M. Satz, Jr., U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., on the brief), for intervenor United States of America.

David A. Adelman, Newark, N. J., for appellee Lizzie Miller and others.

Before KALODNER, FORMAN and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On review of the record we find no error. The District Court’s Order of November 29, 1963 granting summary judgment will be affirmed.
#### Ruth BAYHI and David Bayhi v. TOMORROW 34 OAP, L.P. and/or TMFGP 34 Corp and/or B6k-Integrated Louisiana Management, LLC and/or BGK Integrated Management, LLC, and/or Big One American Place TIC 2, LLC, Latter & Blum, John Doe, ABC Insurance Company, Def Insurance Company.

No. 2011-CC-0810.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re BGK-Integrated TIC Management; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th-Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 570,366; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 1486.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Samuel KELLY v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0693.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2011.

In re Kelly, Samuel; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 98-4959; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-WR-495.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7154 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7154

To replace drinking water fountains in playgrounds and parks under the 
             Reducing Lead in Drinking Water Grant Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2018

   Ms. Meng introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To replace drinking water fountains in playgrounds and parks under the 
             Reducing Lead in Drinking Water Grant Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Drinking Water in Playgrounds 
and Parks Act''.

SEC. 2. REPLACING DANGEROUS PARK AND PLAYGROUND DRINKING WATER 
              FOUNTAINS.

    Section 1459B(b)(3)(B)(ii) of the Water Infrastructure Improvements 
For The Nation Act (42 U.S.C. 300j-19b(b)(3)(B)(ii)) is amended by 
inserting ``playground, park,'' after ``address lead levels in water 
for human consumption at a school, daycare,''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Alfred ISAAC, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D10-331.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 18, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 28, 2010.

Alfred Isaac, pro se, Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Joshua R. Heller, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Alfred Isaac, Appellant, challenges the trial court’s denial of his post-conviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In the motion, Appellant alleged ten grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel and presented one double jeopardy claim. We affirm the trial court’s non-summary denial of claim I and summary denial of claim XI without further discussion. However, we reverse the trial court’s summary denial of claims II through X.

In support of its summary denial of claims II through X, the trial court identified nine documents as attachments to its order. These documents, however, were not actually attached to the trial court’s order. The State correctly concedes that the trial court failed to attach portions of the record conclusively refuting claims II through X and that the trial court’s summary of denial of these claims must be reversed and remanded for attachment of the portions of the record that conclusively refute the claims. *See Doss v. State,*644 So.2d 124, 125-26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (reversing and remanding claims where the trial court relied on the record in finding the claims without merit but failed to attach pertinent portions of the record to the order summarily denying the claims); *see also Taylor v. State,*583 So.2d 823, 823 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (reversal and remand appropriate where some records were referred to in the order, but they were not attached as required by Rule 3.850). On remand, we direct the trial court to attach the portions of the record referenced in its order as to claims II through X or to conduct an evidentiary hearing on these claims, if necessary.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with directions.

HAWKES, C.J., BENTON and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell W. SAMUEL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-7067.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2000.

Decided Jan. 8, 2001.

Darrell W. Samuel, pro se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, SC, for appellee.

*146Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Darrell W. Samuel seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.*
      ***§United States v. Samuel,*No. CR-94-773 (D.S.C. June 1, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

Samuel filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report. He raised specific objections to four of the claims asserted in his § 2255 motion and supplements to the motion. Samuel has waived appellate review of the claims for which no objections were noted. *See Crum v. Sullivan,*921 F.2d 642, 645 (6th Cir.1990); *Praylow v. Martin,*761 F.2d 179, 181 n. 1 (4th Cir.1985) (party precluded from raising issue on appeal when no objections filed as to that issue).