alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# Time and date:

Wednesday, October 6, 2010; 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

# Place:

Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# Status:

Closed to the Public.

## Matter To Be Considered

### Compliance Status Report

The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of compliance matters. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: September 29, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-25174 Filed 10-1-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
#### Stevens S. ARNOUX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D09-2839.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 20, 2010.

Eileen I. Landy of Michael B. Cohen, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice to appellant filing a timely motion for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

WARNER, POLEN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


RULE
13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)


OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





I, Kelly
E. Lang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report
of Merix Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 29, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly
report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Merix Corporation.





Date:
October 7, 2009





By: /s/ KELLY E.
LANG


Kelly E.
Lang


Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lester RAMSEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15667.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

June 11, 1964.

Charles J. Tekulve, Cincinnati, Ohio, court appointed, for appellant.

Milton J. Trumbauer, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., Lawrence Gubow, U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., on the brief, for appellee.

Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and CECIL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, denying appellant’s application for vacation of sentence under Section 2255, Title 28 U.S.C. The conviction for violation of the narcotic laws, upon which the appellant was sentenced, was affirmed in this Court in United States v. Ramsey, 6 Cir., 291 F.2d 737; cert. den., 368 U.S. 899, 82 S.Ct. 177, 7 L.Ed. 2d 94.

The appeal now before us was submitted upon the record in the District Court, the briefs of the parties and the oral arguments of counsel.

Upon consideration whereof we find no merit to appellant’s claims, no violation of any of his constitutional rights nor any defect in the proceedings of the trial which would entitle the appellant to a vacation of his sentence.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and it is hereby affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7114 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7114

To require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
to encourage States and localities to adopt policies pertaining to the 
  safe relocation of prisoners during major disasters and emergencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 2, 2018

   Ms. Meng introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
to encourage States and localities to adopt policies pertaining to the 
  safe relocation of prisoners during major disasters and emergencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Natural Disaster Safe Inmate 
Relocation Act''.

SEC. 2. SAFE INMATE RELOCATION.

    The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall 
encourage States and localities that receive assistance under the 
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 
U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) to adopt policies regarding the safe relocation of 
prisoners before, during, and after major disasters and emergencies, as 
appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOEL ANTONIO HERNANDEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-0860

[October 22, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Okeechobee County; Michael C. Heisey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

472016CF000193A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ikram Ally, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN, JJ., and FRINK, KEATHAN, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 07-1971

THE ESTATE OF PATRICIA BLALOCK WARD; JOSEPH M. WARD, 

 Plaintiffs – Appellants, 

 v. 

TRANS UNION CORPORATION, 

 Defendant – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. David W. Daniel, 

Magistrate Judge. (4:04-cv-00088-DAN) 

Submitted: January 26, 2009 Decided: February 17, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

The Estate of Patricia Blalock Ward, Joseph M. Ward, Appellants 

Pro Se. Paul L. Myers, STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP, Frisco, Texas; 

Joseph Walter Williford, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, 

North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 The Estate of Patricia Blalock Ward and Joseph M. Ward 

appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of Trans Union 

Corporation on Appellants’ claims under the Fair Credit 

Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1681(u) (2006), and state law 

claims for defamation, interference with contractual relations, 

and false light invasion of privacy. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s judgment. See Estate of Ward v. Trans Union 

Corp., No. 4:04-cv-00088-DAN (E.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2007). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

 AFFIRMED
#### Jorge DIAZ, Appellant, v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, Appellee.

No. 3D09-1248.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 11, 2010.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Oct. 6, 2010.

Aldo Bolliger, Tampa, for appellant.

Golden & Grimes, Yasir Billoo and John Golden, Miami, for appellee.

Before WELLS, SHEPHERD, and SUAREZ, JJ.

WELLS, Judge.

Jorge Diaz, plaintiff below, appeals the trial court order dated February 18, 2009, granting new trial, the order dated March 16, 2009, denying plaintiffs motion for rehearing and plaintiffs motion for leave to amend, and the order dated April 7, 2009, granting defendant’s motion for stay of execution and motion to vacate final judgment and denying defendant’s motion for sanctions. We dismiss as untimely the appeals of the orders of February 18, 2009, and March 16, 2009. We affirm the order of April 7, 2009.

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Billy Strahan v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-19-00332-CR, 01-19-00333-CR

Trial court case number: 2157387, 2157386

Trial court: Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 7 of Harris County

The appellant has filed his fourth motion to extend time, seeking a one-week 

extension for a total of 101 days since appellant’s brief was originally due on July 5, 2019. 

The appellant filed this motion notwithstanding the Court’s prior admonishment that no 

further extensions would be granted and that failure to file appellant’s brief by the thirdextended deadline would result in an abatement of this appeal for a hearing. Nevertheless, 

the Court GRANTS the appellant’s motion to extend time and ORDERS the appellant to 

file his brief on or before October 24, 2019.

If the appellant does not file his brief by October 24, 2019, the Court will abate this 

appeal and remand for the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing to determine, among 

other things, whether the appellant wishes to prosecute the appeal and, if so, to determine 

whether good cause exists to relieve Daucie Schindler as the appellant’s counsel. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2)–(4); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. arts. 1.051(a), (c), (d)(1), 

26.04(j)(2).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __October 22, 2019____
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2014, by andamong WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator, andCustodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Trustee, with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-LC16 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the ReportingPeriod.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

  

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go  far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
The Board of Directors (the Board) of Home Federal Savings Bank has reviewed
your performance evaluation performed by selected members of the Board. In
connection therewith and pursuant to Section 1 of your contract on May 23,
2000, the Board determined to extend your employment contract until the May
Board meeting, 2003.


                                   Home Federal Savings Bank

                                   By:  /s/ M.F. Schumann
                                      --------------------------------
                                      M.F. Schumann
                                           Director

                         EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

     I hereby acknowledge receipt of this notice of extension of the above-
referenced contract and accept the extension of the term of such contract.

                         EMPLOYEE



     Dated: 5/23/00           By:   /s/ Roger P. Weise
            -----------            ------------------------
                                   Roger P. Weise
648 A.2d 720

#### IN THE MATTER OF RAFAEL M. PANTOJA, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 24, 1994.

ORDER

RAFAEL M. PANTOJA, of NEW YORK, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, having been ordered to show cause on October 24, 1994, why this Court’s Order of temporary suspension should not be continued pending the disposition of ethics proceedings against him, and respondent having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause;

It is Ordered that the suspension of RAFAEL M. PANTOJA continue pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he continue to comply with Regulation 23 of the Administrative Guidelines Governing Suspended Attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics take such protective action pursuant to *Rule*l:20-ll(c) as it deems appropriate, including the transfer to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund the attorney account funds held in any financial institution by RAFAEL M. PANTOJA, which funds were restrained from disbursement by this Court’s Order of September 27, 1994.
#### Dorothy POLLOCK, et al. v. TALCO MIDSTREAM ASSETS, LTD.

No. 2011-C-1295.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 2011.

In re Talco Midstream Assets, Ltd.;— Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certio-rari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. C, Nos. *1167511,450,; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,302-CA.

Denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED January 6, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-30423 Summary Calendar

PATRICIA EVANS; ET AL, Plaintiffs,
PATRICIA EVANS; AUTHURINE BRISBON Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT; ET AL, Defendants, HOUSING AUTHORITY OF NEW ORLEANS; CARMEN F. VALENTI, Housing Authority of New Orleans Board of Commissioners; CATHERINE D. LAMBERG, Administrative Receiver; CYNTHIA WIGGINS, Resident Advisor to the Board, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No.03-CV-2411

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Proceeding pro se, plaintiff s Patricia Evans and Authurine Brison appeal the district court’s dismissal of their claim againstNo. 04-50026 -2- the Housing Authority of New Orleans (“HANO”), and HANO employees

Mr. Carmen F. Valen ti, Ms. Catherine Lamberg, and Ms. Cynthia Wiggins. Plaintiffs allege that defendants violated their

con stitutional rights by building and operating their subsidized housing on a waste site, thus creating horrible living conditions,
and “retaliating” against plaintiffs. Although plaintiffs’ original complaint did not cite 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the district

c ourt construed their pro se compliant liberally and found that their allegations might be construed as being brought under § 1983.
The di strict court gave plaintiffs the opportunity to amend their complaint against M r. Carmen F. Valenti, Ms. Catherine Lamberg and Ms. Cynthia Wiggins, all emplo yees of the Housing Authority of New Orleans, t o plead facts sufficient to overcome
their defense of qualified immunity. S ee Schultea v. Wood , 47 F.3d
1427 (5th Cir. 1995). After considering all of plaintiffs’ subsequent filings the district court found that plaintiffs had not pleaded facts su fficient to make out such a claim, or any other federal claim, and dismissed their claims with prejudice. Upon a review of the record we find that plaintiffs have not alleged facts sufficient to establish any federal cause of action and the district court therefore properly dismissed their claims. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GENERAL
MEDIA, INC'S SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 FORM 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,893
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,974
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,555
<PP&E>                                           3,026
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,495
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                    (57,115)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,878
<SALES>                                         56,621
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,621
<CGS>                                           23,201
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,305
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   398
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,149)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,937
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,446
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,491
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,491
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7266 

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to consider the 

Margaret R. Pardee Memorial Hospital as a covered entity for purposes 

of the 340B drug discount program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 12, 2018 

Mr. MEADOWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

to consider the Margaret R. Pardee Memorial Hospital 

as a covered entity for purposes of the 340B drug discount program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF MARGARET R. PARDEE ME4 MORIAL HOSPITAL AS COVERED ENTITY FOR 

5 PURPOSES OF 340B DRUG DISCOUNT PRO6 GRAM. 

7 Notwithstanding the definition of a ‘‘covered entity’’ 

8 under paragraph (4) of section 340B(a) of the Public 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 7266 IH

1 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 256b(a)), the Secretary of 

2 Health and Human Services shall consider the Margaret 

3 R. Pardee Memorial Hospital located in Hendersonville, 

4 North Carolina, as a covered entity under such paragraph 

5 for purposes of allowing the Margaret R. Pardee Memorial 

6 Hospital to participate in the drug discount program 

7 under such section 340B. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
|  | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 7, 2010 | By:                                                                   | /s/ Robert Dinning |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
|                   | Name:      Robert Dinning                                             |
|                   | Title:      Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting  Officer |

----
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1470

AN ACT

To amend the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care 

Programs Enhancement Act of 2001 to require the provision of chiropractic care and services to veterans at all 

Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1470 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chiropractic Care 

3 Available to All Veterans Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROGRAM FOR PROVISION OF CHIROPRACTIC 

5 CARE AND SERVICES TO VETERANS. 

6 Section 204(c) of the Department of Veterans Affairs 

7 Health Care Programs Enhancement Act of 2001 (38 

8 U.S.C. 1710 note) is amended—

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘The program’’; 

10 and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

12 paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(2) The program shall be carried out at not fewer 

14 than 75 medical centers by not later than December 31, 

15 2009, and at all medical centers by not later than Decem16 ber 31, 2011.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2007. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1470

AN ACT

To amend the Department of Veterans Affairs 

Veterans Affairs medical centers.and services to veterans at all Department of 2001 to require the provision of chiropractic care Health Care Programs Enhancement Act of