alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                    9
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule Contains Summary  Financial  Information  Extracted
From (a) Item 7 - "Financial  Statements And Supplementary  Data" And
Is Qualified In Its Entirety By Reference To Such (b) Financial
Statements  Included In This Report And Incorporated Herein By
Reference.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                             0000921085
<NAME>                 CENTRAL COAST BANCORP
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000

<S>
                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                   JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                41,297
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                      14,461
<TRADING-ASSETS>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>          140,220
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       0
<LOANS>                              439,838
<ALLOWANCE>                            8,389
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       642,928
<DEPOSITS>                           576,101
<SHORT-TERM>                               0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                    5,809
<LONG-TERM>                            4,078
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              46,182
<OTHER-SE>                            10,758
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>       642,928
<INTEREST-LOAN>                       10,830
<INTEREST-INVEST>                      2,353
<INTEREST-OTHER>                         393
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                      13,576
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                     4,834
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     4,901
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                  8,675
<LOAN-LOSSES>                          1,530
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                         0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                        4,298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        3,519
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>             3,519
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                           2,253
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                          5.82
<LOANS-NON>                              421
<LOANS-PAST>                              70
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                           0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                       7,018
<CHARGE-OFFS>                            181
<RECOVERIES>                              22
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                      8,389
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                   8,389
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                        0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                    0




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                          5
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              124,708
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2,241,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                        177,342
<INVENTORY>                                         849,682
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3,204,236
<PP&E>                                            3,374,722
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,553,007
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6,254,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,068,275
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             30,311
<OTHER-SE>                                        2,956,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6,254,872
<SALES>                                           2,956,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2,956,096
<CGS>                                             1,748,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1,748,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,241,914
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   39,580
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (73,898)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            224
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (74,122)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (74,122)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.03)

        

</TABLE>
#### Elaine C. WAGUESPACK v. George K. WAGUESPACK.

No. 2010-C-2166.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Waguespaek, George K.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 75139; *390to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 CA 1478.

Denied.

VICTORY and GUIDRY, JJ., would grant.
#### Willard J. Turner, Prosecuting Attorney of Muskegon County, v. William H. Smith, Under-Sheriff of Muskegon County.

*Justice of the peace*— Contempt—Sentence.

1. A sentence by a justice of the peace for contempt under How. ■ Stat. § 7077, that the respondent pay a fine of $25 within one hour, and, in default of such payment, that he be imprisoned in the common jail for a period of 5 days, is an alternative sentence, and void; citing *Brownbridge v. People,*38 Mich. 751; *Donnoly v. People,*Id. 756.

2. How. Stat. § 7107, which extends somewhat the authority of justices of the peace in imposing sentences, does not apply to How. Stat. § 7077, which governs the imposition of sentence in proceedings for contempt.

*Mandamus.*

Argued February 9, 1892.

Denied February 10,

and opinion filed February 16, 1892.

Eelator applied for *mandamus*to compel the respondent to serve a warrant of commitment issued by a justice of the peace in execution of a sentence for contempt. The facts are stated in the opinion.

*W. J. Turner*and *DeLong & O’Hara,*for relator.

*F. W. Cook,*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

*Mandamus*is asked to compel the respondent to serve a warrant of commitment, commanding him to receive into his custody and imprison one 'Charles S. Marr for a period of five days. This warrant was based upon a sentence of the justice imposed upon Marr for a contempt of court. The sentence was that •said Charles S. Marr pay a fine of $25 within one hour, .and, in default of • the payment of said fine within *310the time specified, that he be imprisoned in the common jail of the county for the period of 5 days.

The statute (How. Stat. § 7077) authorizing punishment for contempt by justices of the peace provides that such punishment—

> “May be by fine not exceeding $25, *or*by imprisonment in the county jail, not exceeding *five days, or*both, in the discretion of the justice; but no person shall remain imprisoned for the non-payment of such fine more than ten days."

The sentence of imprisonment was not imposed as a means of insuring the payment of the fine under the latter clause of the section quoted, as for that purpose it could only have provided for the detention of the prisoner until the fine should be paid, not exceeding 10 days; but by this sentence the prisoner was subjected to-an imprisonment absolutely for a period of 5 days, from which he could, under the terms of the sentence, relieve himself only by the payment of the fine within *one hour.*This constituted an alternative sentence, and was void, under the repeated rulings of this Court. *Brownbridge v. People,*38 Mich. 751; *Donnoly v. People,*Id. 756. The sentences imposed in the cases cited were in criminal proceedings under chapter 179, Comp. Laws 1871, but the authority of the justice to punish by fine or imprisonment, or both, is precisely the same under each statute.

By an amendment to chapter 179 (How. Stat. § 7107), the authority of the justice has been somewhat extended, but that amendment does not apply to the statute under which the justice acted in this case (section 7077).

As the sentence was void, it follows that *mandamus*will not issue to enforce its execution.
#### Day *v.*Puett.

New Trial, 29 Cyc. p. 832, n. 60.

No. 6330.

March 14, 1928.

Claim. Before Judge Wood. Forsyth superior court. October 1, 1927.

*A. B.*TolUson, for plaintiff in error. *J. P. Brooke,*contra.

Gilbert, J.

The exception is to a judgment overruling a motion for new trial based upon general grounds only. The verdict is supported by evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. 22-0662

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

LLOYD MORTIER BARRUS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 5, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 29 2023

12/29/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0662
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          18,758
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          90,733
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    89
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                32,337
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,503,138
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,481,286
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,243,164
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,686,132
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,005,510
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,333
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           31,050
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           339
<OTHER-SE>                                     509,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,243,164
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 43,866
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               45,559
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,099
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                91,524
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              39,275
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,991
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           24,533
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,155
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 192
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 22,309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,319
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,408
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,987
<CHANGES>                                          469
<NET-INCOME>                                       952
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.12
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,760
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    368
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,766
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      105
<RECOVERIES>                                        31
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,847
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,847
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          5,394


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Larry CAGER.

No. 2010-KK-2063.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 15, 2010.

PER CURIAM.

Granted. The court of appeal’s ruling is vacated and the trial court’s ruling, finding probable cause to charge defendants, is reinstated. The recent amendment of R.S. 14:402(E)(7), to clarify that cellular teler phone chargers as well as cellular telephones fall under the proscription of “any telecommunications equipment” as contraband in any municipal or parish prison or jail does not, by negative implication, mean that cell phone chargers did not formerly belong in the class of prohibited telecommunications equipment, “including but not limited to cellular phones ...” 2004 La. Acts 602 (adding La. R.S. 14:402(E)(7)). Giving the term “telecommunications equipment” the “fair import of [its] words, taken in their usual sense in connection with the content, and with reference to the purpose of the provision,” La. R.S. 14:3, telecommunications equipment may be fairly said to encompass a device needed to charge a cell phone for continued operation and use, and it makes no difference under La. R.S. 14:402(E)(7) “whether or not such equipment may be intended for use in planning or aiding an escape or attempt to escape from any institution.”1

REVERSED; TRIAL COURT RULING REINSTATED.

1

. All parties concede the court of appeal committed legal error when it found that La. R.S. 14:402(E)(7) required evidence to show that the equipment was intended to be used in an escape. La. R.S. 14:402(E)(7) specifically provides otherwise.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000921052
<NAME>                        WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS, L.P., Series 4
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                           1,557,186
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,557,186
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,809,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,906,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,809,404
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    55,214
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       54,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   337,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (336,341)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (336,341)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (336,341)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (28.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7707
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GODFREY LLEWELLYN SPENCER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-91-138, CA-96-866-R) Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 26, 1998 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Godfrey Llewellyn Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Breeding Peters, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Spencer , Nos. CR-91-138; CA-96-866-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                              1,040,000
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       1,092,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                           450,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    2,629,000
<PP&E>                                              5,016,000<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      8,349,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               1,293,000
<BONDS>                                             1,250,000<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                               57,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          5,749,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        8,349,000
<SALES>                                             1,000,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    3,348,000
<CGS>                                               1,082,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    4,164,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     26,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (1,392,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (1,392,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1,392,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (.28)

<FN>
<F1> Notes and accounts receivable - trade are reported net of allowances for
     doubtful accounts in the Balance Sheet.

<F2> Property, plant, and equipment are reported net of accumulated depreciation
     in the Balance Sheet.

<F3> Excludes current portion.
</FN>
                                               


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     9
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          337
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          939
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  23,532
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              0
<LOANS>                                      19,255
<ALLOWANCE>                                     293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               44,975
<DEPOSITS>                                   32,340
<SHORT-TERM>                                  1,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             589  
<LONG-TERM>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                         60
<OTHER-SE>                                   10,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               44,975
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               1,132
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             1,116
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 60
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              2,308
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            1,003
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,019
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         1,289
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    42
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               26
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               1,073
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 246
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      246
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    149
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.95
<LOANS-NON>                                      15
<LOANS-PAST>                                     41
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                255
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     4
<RECOVERIES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               293
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            293
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           0
        


</TABLE>
#### Sean N. SHUMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-4714.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 23, 2011.

Rodney G. Gregory and Nah-deh Simmons of The Gregory Law Firm, Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. *Baker v. State,*878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).

THOMAS, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.