alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                      22,031,844
<SECURITIES>                                23,156,541
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,764,282
<PP&E>                                      13,748,722
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,810,441
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,777,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,492,560
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       142,399
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,011,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,777,654
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,039,141)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,039,141)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,039,141)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)


</TABLE>
#### Jill TINETTI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee WITTKE, Sheriff Racine County, Jane Doe, a Racine County Matron whose name is unknown, and County of Racine, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 79-2442.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Argued April 11, 1980.

Decided April 24, 1980.

Richard H. Kjeldgaard, Racine, Wis., for defendants-appellants.

Terry W. Rose, Kenosha, Wis., Raymond M. Dall’osto, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CASTLE, Senior Circuit Judge, SWYGERT and SPRECHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellee Jill Tinetti brought this suit challenging the constitutionality of the defendants-appellants’ practice of strip-searching persons arrested for non-misdemeanor traffic offenses. The searches were conducted upon all such offenders who were detained overnight in the Racine County jail due to an unwillingness or inability to post bond before their initial appearance in court.1 The searches were conducted despite the absence of any probable cause to believe that the detainees were concealing contraband or weapons on their bodies. The district court ruled that the appellants’ practices violated the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, and granted Ti-netti both declaratory and injunctive relief. *161We affirm the judgment of the district court, which is published at 479 F.Supp. 486 (E.D.Wis.1979), and adopt the district court’s Memorandum and Order as the decision of this court.

Accordingly, the decision of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

1

. Although the searches were discontinued in response to this lawsuit, the district court ruled that the situation was “capable of repetition yet evading review”. 479 F.Supp. 486, 489 (E.D.Wis. 1979). This ruling was not challenged on appeal.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7132 

To permit aliens who lawfully enter the United States on valid visas as 

nonimmigrant elementary and secondary school students to attend public 

schools in the United States for longer than 1 year if such aliens 

reimburse the local educational agency that administers the school for 

the full, unsubsidized per capita cost of providing education at such 

school for the period of the alien’s attendance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2018 

Mr. WELCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To permit aliens who lawfully enter the United States on 

valid visas as nonimmigrant elementary and secondary 

school students to attend public schools in the United 

States for longer than 1 year if such aliens reimburse 

the local educational agency that administers the school 

for the full, unsubsidized per capita cost of providing 

education at such school for the period of the alien’s 

attendance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7132 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening Amer3 ica’s Public Schools Through Promoting Foreign Invest4 ment Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY 

6 SCHOOL STUDENTS. 

7 Section 214(m)(1)(B) of the Immigration and Na8 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(m)(1)(B)) is amended by 

9 striking ‘‘unless—’’ and all that follows through ‘‘(ii)’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘unless’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
ex10-2.htm


    Exhibit
10.2

     

    


     

    


     

    FORM
OF WAIVER

     

    In
consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s
participation in the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital
Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the United States
or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required
to comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as
published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008.

     

    I
acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation,
bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements
(including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer
or in which I participate as they relate to the period the United States holds
any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital
Purchase Program.

     

    This
waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any
state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation,
including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other payments I
would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation
was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these
regulations on my employment relationship.

     

    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto signed my name this 9th day of January,
2009.

     

    


     

    
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              [Name]
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of CV Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                         
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Dated: November 8, 2006 |  | /s/ DANIEL K. SPIEGELMAN
|                        |  | Daniel K. Spiegelman    
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC (the Subservicer), does
hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 18, 2014, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-3 and U.S. Bank National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Servicing Agreement, dated July 15, 2016 (the Servicing Agreement), by and between Santander Consumer USA Inc. and Santander
Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC, and the related Second Amended and Restated Program Portfolio Schedule (Publicly Registered Transactions), dated as of June 28, 2017 (the Second Amended and Restated Program Portfolio Schedule, together
with the Servicing Agreement, the Subservicing Agreement), during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement and the Subservicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the
subject of the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER INTERNATIONAL PUERTO RICO LLCBy:

/s/ Jose RamirezName:

Jose RamirezTitle:

Vice President of Servicing for Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico, LLCDate:

March 30, 2018
#### Sothea KIM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D10-3220.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Nov. 12, 2010.

Sothea Kim, Bonifay, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence rendered in case no. 2008-CF-009967-B-O, in the Circuit Court in and for Orange County, Florida. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

MONACO, C.J., GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Barbara S. Remley, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MakeMusic! Inc.;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smallbusiness issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuerand have:
     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.     The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     Date: August 13, 2003 By: /s/ Barbara S. Remley        Chief Financial Officer
18
___________________ ___________________

_____________ _______________ ___________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 133394 Robert P. Young, Jr. 133396 Stephen J. Markman,
Justices 133400-133406 & (74)

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 133394 COA: 267565 Oakland CC: 05-064732-AA STATE TAX COMMISSION and DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, Respondents-Appellees, and

CITY OF AUBURN HILLS, Respondent-Appellant.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 133396 COA: 262500 Wayne CC: 04-430612-AA, STATE TAX COMMISSION and 04-430613-AA, 04-430614-AA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, Respondents-Appellees, and

CITY OF DEARBORN, Intervening Respondent-Appellant.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 133400-02 COA: 262487, 262488, 262500 Wayne CC: 04-430612-AA, STATE TAX COMMISSION and 04-430613-AA, 04-430614-AA2

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY,

and Respondents-Appellants,

CITY OF DEARBORN, Intervening Resp ondent-Appellee.

_____________ _______________ ___________
DETROIT DIESEL CORPORATION, Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,

v SC: 133403 COA: 263188

STATE TAX COMMISSION and Wayne CC: 04-430915-AA

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY,

and Respondents-Appellants, Cross-Appellees,

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF REDFORD, Intervening Resp ondent-Appellee, Cross-Appellee.

_____________ _______________ ___________

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 133404 COA: 264154

STATE TAX COMMISSION and Wayne CC: 05-507760-AA

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, Respondents-Appellants.

_____________ _______________ ___________

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 133405 COA: 265686 Washtenaw CC: 2005-000250-AA STATE TAX COMMISSION and DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY,

and Respondents-Appellants,

TOWNSHIP OF SYLVAN, Respondent-Appellee.

___________________ ___________________________________________________________ __ 3

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 133406 COA: 267565 Oakland CC: 05-064732-AA STATE TAX COMMISSION and DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY,

and Respondents-Appellants,

CITY OF AUBURN HILLS, Respondent-Appellee.

_____________ _______________ ___________
On order of the Chief Justice, the joint motion for extension of the time for filing by appellants and cross-appellants and for a corresponding extension for appellees and cross-appellees is considered and it is GRANTED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 25, 2008

Clerk
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-50253

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OMAR DEMORTIUS WILLIAMS, also known as Omar Williams,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:06-CR-38-1

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

A jury convicted Omar Demortius Williams of possession with intent to

distribute at least 50 grams of cocaine base (crack) within 1,000 feet of a public

school (count one) and possession with intent to distribute cocaine base (count

two). The district court sentenced Williams to life in prison on count one and

240 months on count two and ordered the sentences to run concurrently. See 21

U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(iii).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 6, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 09-50253

2

Williams argues that the imposition of a life sentence is cruel and unusual

punishment under the Eighth Amendment. He argues that the gross

disproportionality between his life sentence and the sentences for similar crimes

in this and other jurisdictions makes his life sentence unconstitutional.

Williams asserts that the prior convictions that qualified him for the life

sentence were “relatively minor offenses,” two being state jail felonies and one,

a more serious felony. He asks this court to consider the disparity between crack

cocaine and powder cocaine sentences and argues that a departure based on such

disparity can be reasonable.

Williams’s arguments are foreclosed. See Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S.

957, 994-95 (1991); United States v. Harris, 566 F.3d 422, 436 (5th Cir. 2009),

petition for cert. filed, (Aug. 20, 2009) (No. 09-7385); United States v. Parker, 505

F.3d 323, 330-31 (5th Cir. 2007). Williams’s reliance on Kimbrough v. United

States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007) is misplaced. Kimbrough recognized that district

courts remain bound by the statutory minimum sentences in § 841(b)(1).

Kimbrough, 552 U.S. at 107.

Accordingly, Williams’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24980]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 5044-015]


Avondale Mills Inc.; Augusta Canal Authority; Notice of 
Application for Transfer of License, and Soliciting Comments and 
Motions To Intervene

September 24, 2010.
    On September 13, 2010, Avondale Mills Inc. (transferor) and Augusta 
Canal Authority (transferee) filed an application for transfer of 
license for the Sibley Mill Project No. 5044, located on the Augusta 
Canal in the City of Augusta, Richmond County, Georgia.
    Applicants seek Commission approval to transfer the license for the 
Sibley Mill Project from transferor to transferee.
    Applicants' Contact: Alan W. Stuart, Kleinschmidt Associates, 204 
Caughman Farm Lane, Suite 301, Lexington, SC 20972, (803) 462-5620.
    FERC Contact: Kim Carter (202) 502-6486.
    Deadline for filing comments and motions to intervene: 30 days from 
the issuance date of this notice. Comments and motions to intervene may 
be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1) and 
the instructions on the Commission's Web site under http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief 
comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the 
eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You 
must include your name and contact information at the end of your 
comments. If unable to be filed electronically, documents may be paper-
filed. To paper-file, an original plus seven copies should be mailed 
to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. More information about 
this project can be viewed or printed on the eLibrary link of the 
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. 
Enter the docket number (P-5044) in the docket number field to access 
the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24980 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Michael O’BRIEN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-2766.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 25, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 28, 2010.

Michael O’Brien, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

DAVIS, BENTON, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
#### Tihomir JANCAN and Milana Janean v. EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD.

No. 2011-C-2251.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Janean, Tihomir et al.; Janean, Milana; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. M, No. 509163; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 2192.

Denied.

JOHNSON and GUIDRY, JJ„ would grant.