alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7207 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7207

 To allow the Secretary of the Treasury to accept public donations to 
  fund the construction of a barrier on the border between the United 
               States and Mexico and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 30, 2018

 Mr. Davidson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow the Secretary of the Treasury to accept public donations to 
  fund the construction of a barrier on the border between the United 
               States and Mexico and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BORDER WALL TRUST FUND.

    (a) Border Wall Trust Fund.--At the end of subchapter III of 
chapter 33 of title 31, United States Code, insert the following:
``Sec. 3344. Border wall trust fund.
    ``(a) Authority To Receive Gifts.--Notwithstanding section 3113, 
the Secretary of the Treasury may accept for the Government a gift of 
money on the condition that it be used to plan, design, construct, or 
maintain a barrier along the international border between the United 
States and Mexico.
    ``(b) Trust Fund.--Not later than 60 days after the date of 
enactment of this section, the Secretary of the Treasury shall--
            ``(1) establish an account, to be known as the `Border Wall 
        Trust Fund', into which money received as gifts under this 
        section shall be deposited; and
            ``(2) create a publically accessible website to receive 
        such gifts.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents for chapter 33 of 
title 31, United States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the 
following:

``3344. Border Wall Trust Fund.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE ex rel. Donald WILLIAMS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1261.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2011.

In re Williams, Donald; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. A, No. 305-606; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-493.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; cf. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D).
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S7497]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

            SUBMISSION OF CONCURRENT AND SENATE RESOLUTIONS

  The following concurrent resolutions and Senate resolutions were 
read, and referred (or acted upon), as indicated:

           By Mr. AKAKA (for himself, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Daschle, Mr. 
             Kennedy, Mr. Simon, and Mr. Murkowski):
       S. Res. 125. A bill honoring the contributions of Father 
     Joseph Damien de Veuster for his service to humanity, and for 
     other purposes; considered and agreed to.
           By Mr. McCONNELL:
       S. Res. 126. A resolution to amend the Senate gift rule; to 
     the Committee on Rules and Administration.
           By Ms. SNOWE:
       S. Res. 127. A resolution to express the sense of the 
     Senate on border crossing fees; to the Committee on the 
     Judiciary.
           By Ms. SNOWE:
       S. Con. Res. 15. A concurrent resolution expressing the 
     sense of Congress regarding the escalating costs of 
     international peacekeeping activities; to the Committee on 
     Foreign Relations.
           By Ms. SNOWE:
       S. Con. Res. 16. A concurrent resolution expressing the 
     sense of Congress that the Russian Federation should be 
     strongly condemned for its plan to provide nuclear technology 
     to Iran, and that such nuclear transfer would make Russia 
     ineligible under terms of the Freedom Support Act; to the 
     Committee on Foreign Relations.
     

                          ____________________
```
#### In re Laura Bishop KNOLL.

No. 11-OB-1061.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 2011.

PER CURIAM.*

| t After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude petitioner, Laura Bishop Knoll, is eligible to be conditionally admitted to the practice of.law in Louisiana, subject to the following conditions:

1. The term of this conditional admission shall be for five years from the date of admission. However, petitioner’s conditional admission status shall not be terminated until this court so orders.

2. During the period of this conditional admission, petitioner shall be monitored by the Lawyers Assistance Program (LAP).

*7583. Petitioner shall be responsible for ensuring that monthly reports of her progress and participation in LAP are forwarded to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

4. Upon the expiration of the term of petitioner’s LAP agreement, the Executive Director of LAP shall forward to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (a) a final report of petitioner’s progress and participation in LAP, and (b) a recommendation regarding the need for petitioner’s continued participation in LAP.

5. Following receipt of the report from LAP, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel shall file a report in this court in which it shall recommend whether the conditional admission shall be allowed to terminate or shall be extended.

|26. Petitioner shall cooperate with LAP and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and shall comply with any and all requirements imposed upon her by LAP and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

Should petitioner fail to make a good faith effort to satisfy these conditions, or should she commit any misconduct during the period of probation, her conditional right to practice may be terminated or she may be subjected to other discipline pursuant to the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement.

CONDITIONAL ADMISSION GRANTED.

KNOLL, J., recused.

*

 Chief Justice Catherine D. Kimball not participating in the opinion; Justice Jeannette Ther-iot Knoll recused.
#### Charles H. Moore et al. v. The Board of Auditors of Wayne County.

*Officers*— Deputy *game and fish wardens*— Salary.

The board of auditors of Wayne county, under section 7 of Act No. 28, Laws of 1887 (3 How. Stat. § 2197a;), which authorizes them to fix the compensation of deputy game and fish wardens, have the power to fix such compensation for *each year*at such sums as to them may seem proper.

*Mandamus.*

Submitted February 2, 1892.

Denied February 3,

and opinion filed February 10, 1892.

Relators applied for *mandamxis*to compel tbe respondent to issue warrants on the county treasurer for their salary as deputy game and fish wardens at the rate of $1,000 per year.

*W. F. Atkinson,*for relators.

Per Curiam.

Moore and two others are regularly appointed deputy game and fish wardens for Wayne county. They do not show when either of them was appointed.

The petition for *mandamus*sets forth that May 23, 1887, the board of auditors fixed the salary of their offices at $1,000 per year, which salary was continued up to January 1, 1892; that said board has undertaken to fix the salary for the present year at $300. Relators claim that they are State officers, and that the board, after fixing the salary at $1,000, has no power to change it.

It is not necessary to decide whether the relators are State officers. Under the act by yirtue of which these *270gentlemen hold their offices it is provided that they shall receive such compensation as the board of auditors may allow.1 No brief is presented, and we can see no reason why this compensation cannot be fixed by the members of the board for each year at such sums as to them may seem proper.

Writ denied.

1

 Act No. 28, Laws of 1887, § 7.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7147 

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to treat certain planted soybean crops 

as harvested commodity crops under the Market Facilitation Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2018 

Mr. ABRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to treat certain planted soybean crops as harvested commodity crops under 

the Market Facilitation Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PLANTED CROP TREATED AS HARVESTED 

4 CROP. 

5 If the Secretary of Agriculture determines that mar6 ket conditions have discouraged or prevented a producer 

7 of a soybean crop from harvesting such crop or entering 

8 such crop in to the stream of commerce, the Secretary 

9 shall, for purposes of the Market Facilitation Program 

10 under part 1409 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7147 IH

1 (established pursuant to the Commodity Credit Corpora2 tion Charter Act (15 U.S.C. 714 et seq.)) treat such soy3 bean crop as an eligible crop for payments under such 

4 Market Facilitation Program. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2014, by andamong J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Torchlight LoanServices, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee,and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C20 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

  

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<MULTIPLIER>     1
       
<S>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       219,462 
<SECURITIES>                                 100,000 
<RECEIVABLES>                              1,905,782
<ALLOWANCES>                                  62,307
<INVENTORY>                                  607,778
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           2,932,870
<PP&E>                                     3,098,558
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,188,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             5,890,580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,661,484
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      26,449
<OTHER-SE>                                 3,045,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               5,890,580
<SALES>                                    3,001,896
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           3,001,896
<CGS>                                      1,863,245
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,863,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           1,134,727
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            34,099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              112,452
<INCOME-TAX>                                     161
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          112,291
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 112,291
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.04
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT RESTAURANT CORP.
REPORT ON FORM 10-K DECEMBER 28, 2004 CERTIFICATION BY STEVEN M. JOHNSON PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, Chief Executive Officer of Total Entertainment Restaurant Corp. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that the Form 10-K of the Company for
the year ended December 28, 2004 (the Annual Report) accompanying this certification fully
complies with the requirements of the Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The
foregoing certification is incorporated solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be used for any other purpose. Date
    
    April 21, 2005
    

/s/
Steven M. JohnsonSteven M. Johnson
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  financial  information  extracted from the consolidated
financial statements of FirstBank Corp. for the year ended March 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                          0001035513
<NAME>              FirstBank Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                           1
<CURRENCY>                           USD

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>               APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                 MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                        1
<CASH>                             8,536
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>             1,503
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                   2,309
<TRADING-ASSETS>                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>       16,671
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>             3,439
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>               3,400
<LOANS>                          165,617
<ALLOWANCE>                        1,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   206,745
<DEPOSITS>                       133,278
<SHORT-TERM>                      16,200
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                3,665
<LONG-TERM>                       25,827
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                              20
<OTHER-SE>                        27,754
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>   206,745
<INTEREST-LOAN>                   13,315
<INTEREST-INVEST>                    925
<INTEREST-OTHER>                     721
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                  14,961
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                 4,870
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 7,223
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>              7,738
<LOAN-LOSSES>                        296
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                     0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                    7,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    2,955
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>         2,955
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                       2,032
<EPS-BASIC>                       1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                       1.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                      4.00
<LOANS-NON>                          612
<LOANS-PAST>                          13
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                     201
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                        0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                   1,120
<CHARGE-OFFS>                         56
<RECOVERIES>                           1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                  1,361
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>               1,361
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                0


</TABLE>
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. OHIO MASONIC HOME, Respondent.

No. 78-1119.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 15, 1980.

Elliott Moore, Janet McCaa, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, David A. Fleischer, National Labor Relations Board, Emil Far-kas, Director, Region 9, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner.

David A. Weaver, Martin, Browne, Hall & Harper, Robert A. Vaughn, Springfield, Ohio, for respondent.

Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge, and CELEBREZZE and BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judges.

ORDER

National Labor Relations Board has sought enforcement of its order of December 7,1977, directing Respondent, Ohio Masonic Home to cease and desist from refusal to bargain. Affirmatively, the Masonic Home was ordered to bargain with the National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees, Local 1199H (Union) upon request. The opinion of the Board is found at 233 N.L.R.B. No. 48.

An election was conducted on December 8, 1976. The Union won by a 23-vote margin. Home filed six objections to the conduct of the election. The Regional Director of Region 9 overruled these objections and ordered certification of the Union. Exceptions were filed. The Board adopted the findings of the district director and issued its Decision and Certification of Representation dated April 25, 1977. The Masonic Home refused to negotiate, and an unfair labor practice charge was filed against Home on May 11, 1977.

In 1972, Home employees voted for representation and entered into a three-year collective bargaining agreement. In 1976, pending expiration of the 1972 contract, a decertification petition was filed by employ*139ee John Preston suggesting that the Union no longer represented a majority of the employees in the bargaining unit. That petition was dismissed on technical grounds, and a second petition was filed. Subsequently, an agreement was reached involving the Home, the Union, and Preston providing that Home file an RM-Representation (Employer Petition), the Union formally request the election to proceed, and Preston withdraw his second decertification petition. The election was held December 8, 1976.

The Board is vested with wide discretion in establishing the procedure and safeguards necessary to ensure the fair and free choice of bargaining representatives by employees. *See N. L. R. B. v. A. J. Tower Co.,*329 U.S. 324, 330, 67 S.Ct. 324, 327, 91 L.Ed. 322 (1946). In order to deny enforcement and set aside the election in the present case, the employer must establish that the Board acted arbitrarily, capriciously, and abused its discretion. We believe the record before us fails to establish that the Masonic Home carried this burden of proof. The order of the Board shall be enforced.

CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge, would deny enforcement.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), James M. Gower, Chief Executive Officer of Rigel
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company"), and Ryan D. Maynard, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:



In
Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of March 1, 2011.

/s/ JAMES M. GOWER James M. Gower Chief Executive Officer

/s/ RYAN D. MAYNARD Ryan D. Maynard Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


This
certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
868 A.2d 1009

#### IN THE MATTER OF MARVIN LEHMAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 009211974).

March 10, 2005.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-274, concluding that MARVIN LEHMAN of ELIZABETH, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, should be reprimanded for violating *RPC*1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of trust funds), *RPC*1.15(d) (failure to comply with recordkeeping requirements of *R.*1:21-6) and *Rule*1:21-6 (record-keeping requirements);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should be required to submit monthly certified reconciliations of his attorney accounts to the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of one year;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARVIN LEHMAN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

*590ORDERED that respondent shall submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics monthly reconciliations of his attorney accounts prepared by a certified public accountant approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of one year and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated December 3, 1998 except with respect to the matters discussed in
Note 13, as to which date is March 30, 2000 for Charter Behavioral Health
Systems, LLC as of and for the years ended September 30, 1998 and 1997 included
in this Form 10-K for Crescent Operating, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
1999, into the previously filed registration statements of Crescent Operating,
Inc. (Form S-4 No. 333-57891, Form S-8 No. 333-29069 and Form S-8 No.
333-43291).

/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 30, 2000