alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Antonio AYERS *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 97-368

968 S.W.2d 591

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered May 28, 1998

*R.S. McCullough,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Attorney R.S. McCullough, counsel for appellant Antonio Ayers, appeared for a hearing before this court on May 14, 1998, to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for fading to file his client’s brief on or before March 25, 1998, a final extension date, as previously ordered. *Ayers v. State,*333 Ark. 116, 968 S.W.2d 591 (1998).

During the hearing conducted on May 14, 1998, we accepted Mr. McCudough’s gudty plea for fading to file his client’s brief prior to the final extension date of March 25, 1998. Mr. McCullough has taken responsibility for his fadure to file the brief, but he has also submitted certain materials and statements in mitigation when making his plea.

Based upon the foregoing, we hold that R.S. McCullough is in contempt for fading to file his client’s brief in a timely manner, and we fine him $250.00. A copy of this opinion wid be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 11123 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JORDAN MICHAEL PORTER , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:14

- CR

- 270

- 1

Before KING, HAYNES , and GRAVES, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jordan Michael
Porter has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Porter h a s not filed a respons e. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 18 , 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-11123 Document: 00513955763 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/18/2017No. 15

- 11123

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolo us issue for appellate review.
Our review reveals a clerical error in the judgment. The judgment states that Porter pleaded guilty to Count 1 of the indictment when he pleaded guilty to Count 1 of the superseding information. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities h erein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. This matter is REMANDED for the limited purpose of correcting the clerical error in the judgment. See F ED

. R. C RIM

. P. 36. Case: 15-11123 Document: 00513955763 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/18/2017
#### C. E. Gilbert et al. v. H. A. Hancock.

(No. 3102.)

Appeal from Taylor County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 3 7 9. *Trustees; judgment against, in suit for debt of cestui que trust.*Appellee sued appellants as trustees of the Methodist Episcopal Church South, of Abilene, for labor done in building a church. He recovered a judgment for his debt. Appellants claim that the judgment is against them personally. *Held,*that appellants were sued in their fiduciary canacity only, and that judgment *330should he against them only in that capacity, with execution against the *cestui que trust,*wherefore the judgment was reformed and rendered accordingly.

October 25, 1884.

Reformed and rendered.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7260 

To allow for safety regulation of vehicles that are modified to increase seating 

capacity, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2018 

Mr. FASO (for himself, Mr. TONKO, and Ms. STEFANIK) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To allow for safety regulation of vehicles that are modified 

to increase seating capacity, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Limousine Safety Mod5 ernization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SAFETY REGULATION OF LIMOUSINES. 

7 Section 30102(a)(6) of title 49, United States Code, 

8 is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

10 the end; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 7260 IH

1 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period 

2 and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

3 (3) by inserting at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(C) altering a motor vehicle that has al5 ready been purchased by the first purchaser (as 

6 such term is defined in subsection (b)) by in7 creasing the wheelbase of the vehicle so that the 

8 vehicle has increased seating capacity.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7165 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to achieve parity between the cost 

of living adjustment with respect to an annuity under the Federal Employees Retirement System and an annuity under the Civil Service Retirement System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2018 

Mr. CONNOLLY (for himself, Ms. NORTON, Mr. RASKIN, and Mr. BEYER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to achieve parity 

between the cost of living adjustment with respect to 

an annuity under the Federal Employees Retirement 

System and an annuity under the Civil Service Retirement System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal COLA Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7165 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN COLA FOR FERS ANNUITIES. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of subsection (b) 

3 of section 8462 of title 5, United States Code, is amended 

4 to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘(1) Except as provided in subsection (c), effective 

6 December 1 of each year, each annuity payable from the 

7 Fund having a commencing date not later than such De8 cember 1 shall be increased by the percent change in the 

9 price index for the base quarter of such year over the price 

10 index for the base quarter of the preceding year in which 

11 an adjustment under this subsection was made, adjusted 

to the nearest 1 12 ⁄10 of 1 percent.’’. 

13 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub14 section (a) shall apply to— 

15 (1) any cost-of-living adjustment under section 

16 8462 of title 5, United States Code, made after the 

17 date of the enactment of this Act; and 

18 (2) any annuity covered by such section com19 mencing before, on, or after such date. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### DOUSSAN PROPERTIES, LLC v. DOUSSAN GAS AND SUPPLY, LLC, Gas Holdings, Inc. and Union Industrial Gas and Supply, Inc.

No. 2011-CC-1669.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 2011.

In re Sowell, James E.; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedi*1168al Writs,- Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. M, No. 2007-6447; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-C-0617.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000921052
<NAME>                        WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS IV, SERIES 4
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                           1,161,152
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,161,152
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,584,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,201,983
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,584,032
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    10,896
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       18,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   222,248
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (229,701)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (229,701)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (229,701)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (19.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,635
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                46,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         380,991
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           380,210
<LOANS>                                      1,075,466
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,572,770
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,091,500
<SHORT-TERM>                                    49,863
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             20,429
<LONG-TERM>                                    307,068
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,572,770
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 59,544
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               20,259
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    59
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                79,862
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              37,071
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,838
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           25,024
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      570
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,006
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,370
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      13,370
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,370
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.94
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.05
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,714
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,389
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    869
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,776
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      353
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,993
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,993
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 721 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 

railroad track maintenance credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 30, 2017 

Ms. JENKINS of Kansas (for herself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS

of Illinois, and Mr. LIPINSKI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the railroad track maintenance credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Building Rail Access 

5 for Customers and the Economy Act’’ or the ‘‘BRACE 

6 Act’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 721 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE RAILROAD TRACK MAINTE2 NANCE CREDIT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 45G(f) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘, and be5 fore January 1, 2017’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) shall apply to expenditures paid or incurred 

8 in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2016. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1670 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require that advance notice of 

the results of any Department of Defense review of the circumstances 

surrounding the death of a member of the armed forces by friendly 

fire be given to the primary next of kin of the member before public 

release of the review. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2007 

Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require that 

advance notice of the results of any Department of Defense review of the circumstances surrounding the death 

of a member of the armed forces by friendly fire be 

given to the primary next of kin of the member before 

public release of the review. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with HEARING
2 

•HR 1670 IH

1 SECTION 1. ADVANCE NOTICE TO PRIMARY NEXT OF KIN 

2 OF RESULTS OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

3 REVIEW OF FRIENDLY FIRE DEATHS. 

4 (a) ADVANCE NOTICE .—Subchapter I of chapter 75 

5 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at 

6 the end the following new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 1472. Members killed in action by friendly fire: ad8 vance notice to primary next of kin of re9 sults of Department review 

10 ‘‘(a) ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIRED.—In the case of 

11 a review conducted by the Department of Defense regard12 ing the circumstances surrounding the death of a member 

13 of the armed forces who is killed in action by weapon fire 

14 while directly engaged in armed conflict, other than as the 

15 result of an act of an enemy of the United States, the 

16 Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, at a minimum, a 

17 summary of the results of the review are provided to the 

18 primary next of kin of the member at least 24 hours before 

19 the results of the review (or a summary thereof) are re20 leased to the public. The primary next of kin may waive 

21 the notice requirement under this subsection to expedite 

22 the public release of the results of the review. 

23 ‘‘(b) PRIMARY NEXT OF KIN DEFINED.—In this sec24 tion, the term ‘primary next of kin’ means the individual 

25 authorized to direct disposition of the remains of a mem26 ber under section 1482(c) of this title.’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with HEARING
3 

•HR 1670 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by adding 

3 at the end the following new item: 

‘‘1472. Members killed in action by friendly fire: advance notice to primary next 

of kin of results of Department review.’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with HEARING
|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/ Terry L. Stevens                                                               |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Terry L. StevensSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner |   |
| April 28, 2010                                                                 |   |

----
(logo)CWCapital 

ASSET MANAGEMENT 

 

 

**Annual Statement asto Compliance**

**For the Period ofJanuary 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018**

** **

** **

**GSMS 2014-GC22**

 

 

Inaccordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB and with the requirements detailedin §10.7 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for theabove-mentioned CMBS pool, (the “CMBS Pool”), CWCapital Asset Management LLC(“CWCAM”), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officer’sCertificate with respect to the following:

 

(A)    a review of CWCAM’sactivities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the“Reporting Period”) and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has beenmade under such officer’s supervision; and

 

(B)    to the best of suchofficer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period. 

 

 

Shouldyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.  

 

Sincerely,

CWCapitalAsset Management LLC

 

 

/s/JamesP. Shevlin

JamesP. Shevlin

President/ChiefOperating Officer

 

 

7501Wisconsin Avenue | Suite 500 West | Bethesda, MD | 20814
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1654 

To amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to require that the Secretary 

of the Interior determine that a gaming establishment on certain newly 

acquired Indian lands would be in the best interests of certain Indian 

tribes and not detrimental to the surrounding community before such 

lands would be eligible for certain exceptions to the general prohibition 

on gaming on such lands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2007 

Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to require 

that the Secretary of the Interior determine that a gaming establishment on certain newly acquired Indian lands 

would be in the best interests of certain Indian tribes 

and not detrimental to the surrounding community before such lands would be eligible for certain exceptions 

to the general prohibition on gaming on such lands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ccoleman on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1654 IH

1 SECTION 1. BEST INTERESTS OF INDIAN TRIBES AND IM2 PACT ON COMMUNITY CONSIDERED. 

3 Section 20(b)(1)(B) of the Indian Gaming Regu4 latory Act (25 U.S.C. 2719(b)(1)(B)) is amended by in5 serting before ‘‘lands are taken into trust’’ the following: 

6 ‘‘the Secretary, after consultation with the Indian tribe 

7 and appropriate State and local officials, including offi8 cials of other nearby Indian tribes, determines that a gam9 ing establishment on the newly acquired lands would be 

10 in the best interest of the Indian tribe and its members, 

11 and would not be detrimental to the surrounding commu12 nity and those newly acquired’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
Exhibit 11.1
                           STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION
                        OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

                                            Three months ended
                                                  June 30,
                                             2001         2000
                                         -----------  -----------
Net income from continuing operations. . $ 1,275,000  $ 1,249,000
Discontinued operations:
  Loss from discontinued operations. . .    (271,000)    (818,000)
  Estimated loss on disposal . . . . . .  (3,256,000)        --
                                         -----------  -----------
Net income (loss) as reported. . . . . . $(2,252,000) $   431,000
                                         ===========  ===========
BASIC:
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding. . . . .   5,108,837    5,070,167
                                         ===========  ===========
  Basic net income per share from
      continuing operations. . . . . . .      $ 0.25        $0.25
  Basic net loss per share from
      discontinued operations. . . . . .       (0.05)       (0.16)
  Basic net loss per share on disposal of
      discontinued operations. . . . . .       (0.64)        --
                                         -----------  -----------
  Basic net income (loss) per
      share. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      $(0.44)      $ 0.09
                                         ===========  ===========

DILUTED:
  Common and common equivalent shares
  outstanding:
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding. . . . .   5,108,837    5,070,167
    Common stock equivalents from
      options computed on the
      treasury-stock method using
      the average fair market
      value of common stock
      outstanding during the
      period . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     119,536      221,630
                                         -----------  -----------
    Shares used in the
      computation. . . . . . . . . . . .   5,228,373    5,291,797
                                         ===========  ===========
  Diluted net income per share from
      continuing operations. . . . . . .      $ 0.24        $0.24
  Diluted net loss per share from
      discontinued operations. . . . . .       (0.05)       (0.16)
  Diluted net loss per share on disposal
      of discontinued operations . . . .       (0.62)        --
                                         -----------  -----------
  Diluted net income (loss) per
      share. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      $(0.43)      $ 0.08
                                         ===========  ===========