alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1676 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the program of the Secretary of Housing 

and Urban Development for loan guarantees for Indian 

housing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1676 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native American Home 

3 Ownership Opportunity Act of 2007’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LOAN GUARANTEES FOR NATIVE AMERICAN HOUS5 ING. 

6 Section 184(i) of the Housing and Community Devel7 opment Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 1715z–13a(i)) is amended 

8 as follows: 

9 (1) OUTSTANDING AGGREGATE LIMITATION.— 

10 In paragraph (5)(C), by striking ‘‘fiscal years 1997 

11 through 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2008 

12 through 2012’’. 

13 (2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—In 

14 paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘fiscal years 1997 

15 through 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2008 

16 through 2012’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 24, 2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1676 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the program of the Secretary of 

antees for Indian housing. Housing and Urban Development for loan guar-
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7207 

To allow the Secretary of the Treasury to accept public donations to fund 

the construction of a barrier on the border between the United States 

and Mexico and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2018 

Mr. DAVIDSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To allow the Secretary of the Treasury to accept public 

donations to fund the construction of a barrier on the 

border between the United States and Mexico and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BORDER WALL TRUST FUND. 

4 (a) BORDER WALL TRUST FUND.—At the end of 

5 subchapter III of chapter 33 of title 31, United States 

6 Code, insert the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 7207 IH

1 ‘‘§ 3344. Border wall trust fund. 

2 ‘‘(a) AUTHORITY TO RECEIVE GIFTS.—Notwith3 standing section 3113, the Secretary of the Treasury may 

4 accept for the Government a gift of money on the condi5 tion that it be used to plan, design, construct, or maintain 

6 a barrier along the international border between the 

7 United States and Mexico. 

8 ‘‘(b) TRUST FUND.—Not later than 60 days after the 

9 date of enactment of this section, the Secretary of the 

10 Treasury shall— 

11 ‘‘(1) establish an account, to be known as the 

12 ‘Border Wall Trust Fund’, into which money re13 ceived as gifts under this section shall be deposited; 

14 and 

15 ‘‘(2) create a publically accessible website to re16 ceive such gifts.’’. 

17 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

18 for chapter 33 of title 31, United States Code, is amended 

19 by inserting at the end the following: 

‘‘3344. Border Wall Trust Fund.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1725 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1725

     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
participate in the Rancho California Water District Southern Riverside 
        County Recycled/Non-Potable Distribution Facilities and 
Demineralization/Desalination Recycled Water Treatment and Reclamation 
                           Facility Project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2007

  Mrs. Bono (for herself, Mr. Lewis of California, Mr. Issa, and Mr. 
   Calvert) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
participate in the Rancho California Water District Southern Riverside 
        County Recycled/Non-Potable Distribution Facilities and 
Demineralization/Desalination Recycled Water Treatment and Reclamation 
                           Facility Project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rancho California Water District 
Recycled Water Reclamation Facility Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) In General.--The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study 
and Facilities Act (Public Law 102-575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et 
seq.) is amended by adding after section 16__ the following:

``SEC. 16__. RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT PROJECT, CALIFORNIA.

    ``(a) Authorization.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the Rancho 
California Water District, California, may participate in the design, 
planning, and construction of permanent facilities for water recycling, 
demineralization, and desalination, and distribution of non-potable 
water supplies in Southern Riverside County, California.
    ``(b) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total 
cost of the project or $20,000,000, whichever is less.
    ``(c) Limitation.--Funds provided by the Secretary under this 
section shall not be used for operation or maintenance of the project 
described in subsection (a).''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of items in section 2 of Public 
Law 102-575 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
16__ the following:

``Sec. 16__. Rancho California Water District Project, California.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1082 and 1083 (Review)]

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on chlorinated isocyanurates from China and Spain would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.[2] 

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on May 3, 2010 (75 FR 23303) and determined on August 6, 2010 that it would conduct expedited reviews (75 FR 51113, August 18, 2010).

                    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on September 30, 2010. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4184 (September 2010), entitled                     *Chlorinated Isocyanurates from China and Spain: Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1082 and 1083 (Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: September 30, 2010.

Marilyn R. Abbott,

Secretary to the Commission. 

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson determines that revocation of the antidumping duty order on chlorinated isocyanurates from Spain would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2010-25099 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

# AGENCY:

International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice.

## Timeframe for Recruitment and Applications

                    Mission recruitment will be conducted in an open and public manner, including publication in the                     **Federal Register**                    , posting on the Commerce Department trade mission calendar (                    *http://www.ita.doc.gov/​doctm/​tmcal.html*) and other Internet web sites, press releases to general and trade media, direct mail, notices by industry trade associations and other multiplier groups, and publicity at industry meetings, symposia, conferences, and trade shows.                

The recruitment has reopened and the deadline for additional applications is extended to September 29, 2010. The U.S. Department of Commerce will review all additional applications after the deadline. We will inform applicants of selection decisions as soon as possible after the deadline. Applications received after the deadline will be considered only if space and scheduling constraints permit.

Companies who have already applied do not need to reapply.

## Contacts

### U.S. Commercial Service Domestic Contact

                    Lisa Huot, 202-482-2796,                     *Lisa.Huot@trade.gov.*

Lisa Huot,

Trade Promotion Programs, International Trade Specialist, U.S. Commercial Service.

[FR Doc. 2010-24637 Filed 9-30-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7546

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BERNARD GIBSON, SR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:94- cr-00454; 8:05-cv-01437-PJM) Submitted: February 7, 2007 Decided: February 16, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernard Gibson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wilkinson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bernard Gibson, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and the order construing his motion for reconsideration as a successive § 2255 motion and dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gibson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Gibson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Claude Edward SPARKS and Linda G. Sparks v. UNITED TITLE & ABSTRACT, LLC and First American Title Insurance Company.

No. 2011-C-0030.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Sparks, Claude Edward et ah; Sparks, Linda G.; —Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 531,645; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,766-CA.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Arthur K. JONES v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1347.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2011.

In re Jones, Arthur K.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. K, Nos. 00-5302, GO-5762; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 08-WR-1043.

Denied.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7120 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to extend through 

2023 the authority of the Federal Election Commission to impose civil 

money penalties on the basis of a schedule of penalties established and 

published by the Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2018 

Mr. HARPER (for himself and Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

extend through 2023 the authority of the Federal Election Commission to impose civil money penalties on the 

basis of a schedule of penalties established and published 

by the Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY AU4 THORITY OF FEDERAL ELECTION COMMIS5 SION THROUGH 2023. 

6 (a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 

7 309(a)(4)(C)(v) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7120 IH

1 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(4)(C)(v)) is amended by strik2 ing ‘‘December 31, 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

3 2023’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 subsection (a) shall take effect on the earlier of— 

6 (1) December 31, 2018; or 

7 (2) the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1
 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   (A)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and(B)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
   May 14, 2009
    
    
    
    /s/ David T. StonerDate
    
    
    
    David T. StonerChief Executive Officer
#### Xavier Gonzalez REYES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D09-1072.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 22, 2010.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Carol J.Y. Wilson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Tonja Rene Vickers, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Xavier Gonzalez Reyes appeals the judgment and sentence entered after the trial court revoked his probation. We affirm the revocation of probation. We agree with Mr. Reyes that the trial court incorrectly identified the condition of probation he violated. The trial court found that he violated the condition of probation requiring him to submit to random urinalyses as directed by his probation officer. Although this condition is listed as number 11 in the order of probation, the trial court found him in violation of condition 5. On remand, the trial court should correct the written order to reflect that Mr. Reyes violated condition 11. *See Murray v. State,*692 So.2d 965 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of probation and resultant sentence, but we remand for the trial court to correct the written order.

ALTENBERND, VILLANTI, and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 31.1

Sarbanes  Oxley Section 302 Certification

I, Thomas J. May, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of NSTAR;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                              
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  |    
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: April 9, 2012 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    THOMAS J.
MAY                                                         
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Thomas J. May                                                                
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 35**

**SERVICER’S ANNUAL CERTIFICATION**

**MECHANICS BANK**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 4.10 OFTHE SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT**

This Servicer’s Annual Certification is delivered pursuant to a sale and servicingagreement dated as of June 1, 2014 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among, California Republic Auto Receivables Trust 2014-2, California Republic Funding, LLC, Mechanics Bank,as Seller, Servicer, Administrator, Calculation Agent and Custodian (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee (the “Indenture Trustee”) and CSC Logic, Inc. (the“Backup Servicer”). All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning assigned thereto in Appendix A to the Sale and Servicing Agreement. 

The undersigned, a Responsible Officer of the Servicer, hereby certifies that: 

1.         A review of the activities of the Servicer and of the performance of its obligationsunder the Sale and Servicing Agreement during the period from January 1, 2017 to and including December 31, 2017 (the “Review Period”) was conducted under my supervision. 

2.         To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Review Period. 

[SIGNATURE APPEARS ON NEXT PAGE] 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, in my capacity as specified below, has caused this certificate to beexecuted as of the date indicated below. 

 
            Dated: March 29, 2018  /s/ Nathan J. Duda  Nathan J. Duda  Chief Financial Officer
867 A.2d 478

#### IN THE MATTER OF JAMES D. NICHOLS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 261921971).

February 9, 2005.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-240, concluding that JAMES D. NICHOLS of NORTH BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, should be reprimanded for violating *RPC*1.1(a) (gross neglect), *RPC*1.3(lack of diligence), *RPC*1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), and *RPC*1.16(d)(failure to return unearned fee);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should practice under supervision for a period of two years, and if respondent intends to continue practicing immigration law, the proctor should be experienced in immigration law;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES D. NICHOLS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

*434ORDERED that respondent shall inform the Office of Attorney Ethics if he intends to practice immigration law and if he does, the supervising attorney shall be an attorney experienced in immigration law; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boyd Bros. Transportation
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Richard C. Bailey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (3)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and

         (4)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

By: /s/ RICHARD C. BAILEY
   ------------------------

Richard C. Bailey
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Boyd Bros. Transportation Inc. and will be retained by Boyd Bros.
Transportation Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.