alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION
No. 04-09-00083- CV Martha S. CRUZ , Appellant
v . Br ad BECK , et al., Appellee Fr om the 73rd Judi cial District Court, B exar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2006-CI -17431 Honora ble L arr y Noll, J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Sandee B ry an Mar ion, J ustice

Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: J une 17, 2009 DI SMI SSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTI ON On Fe bruar

y 26, 2009, appellant f

iled an Af fidavit of I nability , asser

ting she does not have the nec essar

y financ es to pay

for the c lerk’s r ecor d or re porter’ s rec ord in this a ppeal. On Marc h 4, 20 09 , w e a

bate d th is c a

us e to t he tr ia l court fo r a de te rm inatio n o f w he the r t he a pp e a l is fr ivo lou s. On Marc h 17, 2009, the trial cour t conducted a h ea ri n g on this iss ue and c oncluded a ppellant’s04

- 09

- 00 08 3- CV

- 2- a p p e a l w a s f

r i v o l o u s a n d , t h e r e f

o r e , s h e w a s n o te n t i t l e d

t o a f r e e r e c o r d

o n a p p e a l
. A c c o r d i n g l y,
on Ap ri l 3, 20 09 , th is c ourt

or de re d a pp e lla nt t o pr ov ide wr itt e n pr oo f to thi s c ourt no la te r t ha n Apr il 13, 20 0 9 t h at the cle rk’s fe e has be en paid or arr ang ements have been ma de to pay the cler k’s fe e for pr epar ation of the c lerk’s r ecor d. Our orde r informe d appellant that if she failed to re spond within the time provided, this a ppeal would be dismiss ed for want of pr osecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 37.3(b). Appellant r esponded w ith a letter to this court stating she wa s u n ab l e t o pay for the cler k’s re cord a

nd that she should not be re quired to pay for the r ecor d. On May 1, 2009, this court a g ain orde red a ppellant to provide wr itten proof to this court no later tha n May 18, 2009 that the cler k’s fee has been pa id or arr ang ements have been ma de to pay the cler k’s fe e for

prepa ration of the c lerk’s r ecor d. Our order infor med appe llant that if she fa iled to pr ovide such wr itten proof, this appea l would be dismissed for wa nt of prosec ution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 37.3(b). Appellant ha s not responded. The a ppeal is dismissed f

o r wa n t o f prose cution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a) (1), 42.3( b). Cos ts o f a pp e a l are ta xed

a g a ins t a pp e lla nt.

PER C URI AM
#### Judith S. SCAGLIONE and Raymond C. Doran, Jr. v. Jeanne Nunez JUNEAU, Individually and in Her Capacity as Candidate for the Office of Circuit Judge for the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, and Lena R. Torres, in Her Capacity as Clerk of Court for The Thirty-Fourth Judicial District Court for the Parish of St. Bernard.

No. 2010-C-1831.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 9, 2010.

In re Doran Jr., Raymond C; Scaglione, Judith S. et al.; — Plaintiffs); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 116-190; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-1109.

Denied.

CLARK, J., would grant.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

HERITAGE OAKS BANCORP

 

Quarterly report on Form 10Q

for the quarter ended March 31, 2011

 

 

 

CERTIFICATION

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that to my knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| Dated:   May 6, 2011 | /s/   Lawrence P. Ward          |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                      | Lawrence   P. Ward,             |
|                      | Chief   Executive Officer       |
|                      | (Principle   Executive Officer) |

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Heritage Oaks Bancorp, and will be retained by Heritage Oaks Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

Heritage Oaks Bancorp | - 73 -

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Spark Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Jeffrey D. Marrazzo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his
knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: March 25, 2015 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey D. Marrazzo      
|                     |  |     |  | Jeffrey D. Marrazzo          
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                     |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24960]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-2887-000]


New Hampshire Industries, Inc.; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

September 29, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
New Hampshire Industries, Inc.'s application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 19, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d89e9d8a9b97b6b4b1b6bd8bada8a8b7aaac98bebdaabbf6bfb7ae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94d2d1c6d7dbfaf8fdfaf1c7e1e4e4fbe6e0d4f2f1e6f7baf3fbe2">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24960 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

TO THE 186TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on April 29, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise

or reverse your judgment between

Michael S. Eisenhauer, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04-15-00197-CR and Tr. Ct. No. 2014CR0043

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with the court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on June 30, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
#### STATE ex rel. Carlos A. McGREW v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0617.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 1, 2011.

In re McGrew, Carlos A.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of West Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 06-WMSD-000231; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009-KW-2335.

Denied.
Exhibit 4.6  RIDER TO THE CONTRACT FOR  LOGISTICS SERVICES  BETWEEN THE UNDERSIGNED  EASYDIS, Société par Actions Simplifiée (a simplified joint-stock company), the head offices of which are located at 1 Esplanade de France 42000 SAINT ETIENNE, registered in the Business and Companies Registry of SAINT ETIENNE under number 383 123 874,  duly represented by Julie BADICHE, President  PARTY OF THE FIRST PART,  AND  CDISCOUNT, a Limited Company, the head offices of which are located at 120-126 Quai de Bacalan, 33000 BORDEAUX, registered in the Business and Companies Registry of BORDEAUX under number 424 059 822,  duly represented by Pierre-Yves ESCARPIT, Supply Chain Director  PARTY OF THE SECOND PART.


PREAMBLE  The Parties have signed a contract to provide logistics services on January 24, 2013 (hereinafter the Contract), for products falling under the category of non-food products weighing more than 30 kg and/or with total measurements greater than 2m, as well as 2 riders dated May 16, 2014.  The Parties met in December 2014 in order to verify whether the rates applied by EASYDIS were consistent with market rates.  SOLE CLAUSE  After having analyzed the rates for comparable services in 2014 offered by external service providers, the Parties have noted that the prices of Easydis are higher than market prices.  As a consequence, the Parties agree that for services provided between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014, a rebate calculated based on the prices agreed to between the Parties is owing, taking into account the market prices as offered by competing operators for comparable services.  The Parties furthermore agree to discuss implementing a rate charged based on work units at market prices, which will be used as the basis for invoicing for services provided by Easydis beginning from January 1, 2015.   Signed in Bordeaux, on March 27, 2015  For CDISCOUNT

For EASYDIS/s/ Pierre-Yves Escarpit

/s/ Julie BadichePierre-Yves   ESCARPIT, Supply Chain Director

Julie   BADICHE, President
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph NORAH.

No. 2011-KK-1095.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 31, 2011.

In re Norah, Joseph; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. J, No. 497-717; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0548.

Stay denied; writ denied.
#### Ericka D. WALKER, Appellant, v. TITAN INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, INC., and State of Florida, Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.

No. 4D10-475.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 18, 2011.

*1175Ericka D. Walker, Lake Park, pro se.

M. Elaine Howard, Deputy General Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee, State of Florida, Unemployment Appeals Commission.

PER CURIAM.

*Affirmed. See Velazquez v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n,*916 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); *Martinson v. Breit’s Tower Serv., Inc.,*680 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

GROSS, C.J., HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
Form of Amendment to Severance Agreement (Key Employees)



 Exhibit 10.3 
 MATRIX SERVICE COMPANY 
 AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to Severance Agreement (the “Amendment”) is by and between the undersigned Employee and Matrix Service Company (the “Company”) and
amends the Severance Agreement (the “Agreement”) previously entered into between them. The purpose of this Amendment is to confirm that the Agreement does not constitute a deferred compensation arrangement subject to Section 409A of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, because it falls within the “short-term deferral” exception of Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1. 
 The
Employee and the Company hereby amend the Agreement as follows: 
 1. Subparagraph 3(a) of Paragraph II.B. of the Agreement is hereby amended and
restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “1. Notwithstanding the above, the Employee shall forfeit the severance benefit described
in Paragraph II.A. only if the Employee shall fail to execute and return a non-interference, non-solicitation, waiver and release of claims and confidentiality agreement in a form satisfactory to the Company on or before the payment date. Failure of
the Employee to timely execute and return such agreement shall constitute an absolute forfeiture of such severance benefit.” 
 2. Except to the
extent amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 
 DATED this      day of December, 2008,
to be effective as of January 1, 2009. 
  

			
	“EMPLOYEE”
		
	By:	 	  

	
	“COMPANY”
	MATRIX SERVICE COMPANY
		
	By:	 	  

	Its:
EXHIBIT 23
<PAGE>
[LOGO]    Crisp
          Hughes
          Evans                       Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
          LLP
          ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Affiliated worldwide through AGN International





                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




     As  independent  auditors,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation  of our
report, dated January 21, 2000,  incorporated by reference in this annual report
of SFB Bancorp,  Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999,  into
the  Company's  previously  filed  Form  S-8  Registration  Statement  File  No.
333-76337.





                                                   /s/Crisp Hughes Evans LLP
                                                   -------------------------


Asheville, North Carolina
March 24, 2000



                                        32 Orange Street        828 254 2254
                                        PO Box 3049             Fax 828 254 6859
                                        Asheville, NC 28802     www.che-llp.com
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lakeisha Shanae ADAMS.

No. 2010-KO-1375.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re Adams, Lakeisha Shanae; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 06 CRI 94104; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KA 2015.

Denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors

|                         | 
|------------------------ | 
|The Board of Directors  
|Plumtree Software, Inc.:



|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|We consent to the incorporation by reference in
    the registration statements (Nos. 333-89766, 333-102520 and
    333-112095) on Form S-8 of Plumtree Software, Inc. of our
    report dated January 14, 2004, relating to the consolidated
    balance sheets of Plumtree Software, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
    December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated
    statements of operations, stockholders equity and
    comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the
    years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003,
    which report appears in this annual report on Form 10-K of
    Plumtree Software, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California


March 11, 2004
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                          Washington, DC  20549

                             Form 10-QSB\A

[X]    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
       OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 1996

Commission file number 1-13162

                               EMPIRIC ENERGY, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


            Texas                                     75-2455467
(State or other jurisdiction of                     (IRS Employer 
incorporation or organization)                      Identification No.)


    8201 Preston Road, Suite 580
           Dallas, Texas                                   75225
(Address of principal executive offices)                 (Zip Code)


                               (214) 265-8392                 
           (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)



   Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

           Yes __X__                                No _____


                         PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.

     There were no reports filed.

     In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.

Date:  June 27, 1997

                               EMPIRIC ENERGY, INC.



                               By:_____Clyde E. Skeen______________
                                    Clyde E. Skeen
                                    Chief Financial Officer



                               By:_____James J. Ling______________
                                    James J. Ling
                                    President
863 A.2d 1044

#### IN THE MATTER OF ALLEN J. MEYER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

January 10, 2005.

ORDER

ALLEN J. MEYER formerly of SEA GIRT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since December 23, 2003, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ALLEN J. MEYER is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys.

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7308 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require the disclosure 

of notifications of intent to operate under section 501(c)(4). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2018 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require 

the disclosure of notifications of intent to operate under 

section 501(c)(4). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Increased Trans5 parency in 501(c)(4) Organizations Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF NOTIFICATIONS OF INTENT TO OP7 ERATE UNDER 501(c)(4). 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6104(d)(1)(A) of the In9 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘and’’ in clause (iii), by adding ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7308 IH

1 (iv), and by inserting after clause (iv) the following new 

2 clause: 

3 ‘‘(v) any notification required to be 

4 made by such organization under section 

5 506(a),’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall apply with respect to requests made after 

8 the date that is six months after the date of enactment 

9 of this Act. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS