alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EL PASO CENTRAL APPRAISAL

DISTRICT OF EL PASO COUNTY,

TEXAS,

 Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v.

MISSION SENIOR COMMUNITY, INC.,

AND TIERRA DEL SOL HOUSING

CORPORATION,

 Appellees/Cross-Appellants. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00085-CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2012-DCV-02157)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the joint motion to dismiss and concludes the 

motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed, in accordance with the opinion of 

this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We further order Appellant to pay all costs of this 

appeal. We further order that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
#### Eli KFOURY v. Larry COUPEL and Natalie Coupel.

No. 2011-C-0752.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re Coupel, Larry et al.; Coupel, Natalie; —Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Assumption, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 31,161; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1254.

Denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LEROY COOK, SR.,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 25, 2018

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. 0608025757 (N)

§ 

§ 

§

Submitted: March 2, 2018

Decided: March 27, 2018

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.

O R D E R

This 27th day of March 2018, after consideration of the appellant’s opening 

brief, the appellee’s motion to affirm,1and the record below, we conclude that the 

judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s wellreasoned order dated December 19, 2017. The appellant’s motion for correction of 

a sentence imposed in an illegal manner was a reformulation of previous, 

unsuccessful attacks on his indictment. The Superior Court did not err in finding 

 

1 On March 12, 2018, the appellant filed a motion for leave to respond to the motion to affirm. 

Under Supreme Court Rule 25(a), a response to a motion to affirm is not permitted unless requested 

by the Court. The Court did not request a response to the motion to affirm and finds no reason to 

request a response after considering the appellant's motion.
2

that the appellant challenged his underlying conviction, not his sentence as required 

by Superior Court Criminal Rule 35(a), and that he was not entitled to the relief he 

sought. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is 

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
(logo)Rialto 

         CAPITAL

 

 

**2017 AnnualStatement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

Pooling andServicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of May 1, 2014by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as General Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB as NCB MasterServicer, NCB, FSB as Co-op Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and asCustodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor and Wilmington Trust,National Association as Trustee relating to the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust2014-C20, Commercial Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2014-C20 **(WFRBS2014-C20)**

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.     Allservicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.     Areview of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer forthe period of January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under mysupervision.

 

3.     Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there hasbeen a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, eachfailure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identifiedherein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ AdamSinger                                              

AdamSinger, Managing Director

 

Date:March 1, 2018

 

** **
#### Danny T. JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D09-2981.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 31, 2010.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and M. Gene Stephens, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Michael T. Kennett, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Danny T. Jackson appeals his judgment and sentence for second degree murder arguing that *State v. Montgomery,*39 So.3d 252 (Fla.2010), *approving Montgomery v. State,*— So.3d —, 2009 WL 350624 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), requires reversal because the jury was given the then-existing standard instruction on manslaughter by act which imposed upon the jury the requirement to find that the defendant intended to kill the victim. Subsequent to *Montgomery,*in *Joyner v. State,*41 So.3d 306 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), this court relied upon its previous decision in *Salonko v. State,*42 So.3d 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), and ruled that fundamental *272error does not occur even if the jury was given the erroneous manslaughter by act instruction if the jury was also instructed on manslaughter by culpable negligence giving the jury the option of finding the appellant guilty of a lesser included offense which did not require an intent to kill. As in *Joyner*and *Salonko,*even though the erroneous instruction on manslaughter by act was given, the jury in this case was given the option of finding manslaughter by culpable negligence. We are bound to follow our decisions in *Joyner*and *Salonko. See also Singh v. State,*36 So.3d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); *Cubelo v. State,*41 So.3d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

AFFIRMED.

HAWKES, C.J., VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
23





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements filed by Shore Bancshares, Inc. on
Form S-8 (333-64317, 333-64319, 333-105159, and 333-134955) and on Form S-3
(333-143002 and 333-157141) of our report dated March 12, 2009 with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Shore Bancshares, Inc. and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Shore Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2008.





/s/
      Stegman & Company





Baltimore,
Maryland


March 13,
2009
#### Lorenzo WHITE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D10-4092.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 13, 2011.

Lorenzo White, Bristol, pro se.

Pamela J. Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence in case nos. 2007-CF-008330 and 2007-CF-008451, in the Circuit Court in *1153and for Orange County, Florida. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
#### Henry Adam BALTAZAR, et al. v. Dennis R. WOLINSKI, et al.

No. 2011-C-0051.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

PER CURIAM.*

| iAlthough there is no direct evidence to support the approximately $164,000.00 In-tervenor claims as owing pursuant to a worker’s compensation lien, and no evidence of a stipulation to that amount, Plaintiffs counsel prayed in the trial court “that Intervenor be paid $88,250.84 out of net proceeds for its total intervention.” This prayer evidences an acknowledgment by Plaintiff that this lesser amount, i.e., $38,250.84, could be substantiated by the Intervenor and was owing. When the court of appeal completely nullified the award to the Intervenor, the court of appeal gave no effect to Plaintiffs earlier acknowledgment and granted Plaintiff relief never sought in the trial court. *See*Rule 1-3 of the Uniform Rules-Courts of Appeal (“The Courts of Appeal will review only issues which were submitted to the trial court and which are contained in specifications or assignments of error.”). We reverse the ruling of the court of appeal and render judgment in the amount of $33,250.84 to be deducted from plaintiffs damages award, and which amount shall be apportioned as $22,167.23 to intervenor, and | 3⁄4$11,083.61 to plaintiffs counsel. See LSA-R.S. 23:1103(0(1). In all other respects, the judgment of the court of appeal is affirmed. WRIT GRANTED.

*

 Kimball, C.J. not participating in the decision.
#### John O. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-6676.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 23, 2011.

Rehearing Denied May 5, 2011.

John O. Williams, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
#### Shemika Lashonda BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D09-4045.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 15, 2010.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and David John MePherrin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Shemika Bell timely appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to correct a *341sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). We reverse and remand for correction of the scoresheet and resentencing.

Bell was on probation. An affidavit of violation of probation was filed, but was ultimately dismissed. A few months later, a second affidavit of violation was filed for conduct different than that covered in the first affidavit. Appellant admitted the violations contained in the second affidavit. Her scoresheet erroneously contained six extra points for a community sanction violation, apparently based on the first affidavit of violation that had been dismissed.

The record does not conclusively establish that the trial court would have sentenced Bell to the same sentence in this case had the scoresheet been correct. *See Sanders v. State,*35 So.3d 864, 870-71 (Fla.2010). From the comments made in the sentencing transcript, it appears that both the trial judge and the prosecutor operated under the assumption that Bell’s probation had previously been violated.

*Reversed.*

GROSS, C.J., TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur.
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7187 

AN ACT 

To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until 

December 7, 2018. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7187 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Flood Insur3 ance Program Further Extension Act of 2018’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROGRAM EXTENSION. 

5 (a) FINANCING.—Section 1309(a) of the National 

6 Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘November 30, 2018’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘December 7, 2018’’. 

9 (b) PROGRAM EXPIRATION.—Section 1319 of the Na10 tional Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is 

11 amended by striking ‘‘November 30, 2018’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘December 7, 2018’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7187 

AN ACT 

To extend the National Flood Insurance Program 

until December 7, 2018.
No. 76-5100.

#### Harris *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### John SCIANDRA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D09-5523.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 11, 2011.

Roger D. Futerman and Melissa A. Loesch of Law Offices of Roger D. Futer-man & Associates, Clearwater, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba C. Martin-Schomaker, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

The State properly concedes that John Sciandra’s probation ended on September 19, 1997, and that his order of discharge should have been entered nunc pro tunc to that date. Accordingly, we reverse the order denying Sciandra’s motion to correct illegal sentence. *See Francois v. State,*695 So.2d 695, 697 (Fla.1997) (“[W]hen a probationary period expires, the court is divested of jurisdiction over the probationer unless, prior to that time, the appropriate steps were taken to revoke or modify the probation.”); *Slingbaum v. State,*751 So.2d 89, 89-90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (“[Wjhere it can be determined without an evidentiary hearing that a sentence has been imposed by a court without jurisdiction, that sentence is illegal, whatever its length.”).

Reversed.

ALTENBERND and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
#### Timothy Norman MOODY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D09-5870.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 15, 2011.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 2011.

Sheila Callahan, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for Appellee.

*1162PER CURIAM.

Timothy Norman Moody appeals his convictions for sexual battery on a child, lewd or lascivious molestation, and child abuse. Moody’s appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting that she was unable to make a good-faith argument that reversible error occurred in the trial court with the exception of several sentencing errors which were preserved by two Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) motions. After a careful review of the record, we affirm Moody’s convictions on all counts. However, we remand for resentencing with respect to the lewd or lascivious molestation count.

Moody was sentenced on the lewd or lascivious molestation count under the Jessica Lunsford Act (JLA) and thus the crime was designated as a life felony. § 800.04(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005). Moody was charged and found guilty of committing the crime of lewd or lascivious molestation occurring on or before July 8, 2004, before the effective date of the JLA. Before the enactment of the JLA, the crime of lewd or lascivious molestation was a first-degree felony. § 800.04(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (2004). Accordingly, the trial court erred by sentencing Moody to a life felony on this count; we, therefore, remand for resentencing. *See Perea v. State,*35 So.3d 58, 60 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

Affirmed in part and Reversed in part.

WEBSTER, ROWE, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2




                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-57891 on Form S-4, 333-29069 on Form S-8 and 333-43291 on Form S-8 of
Crescent Operating, Inc. of our report on the consolidated financial statements
of Vornado Crescent Logistics Operating Partnership dated March 2, 2000 (March
8, 2000 as to Note 6), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Crescent
Operating, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 1999.






/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Atlanta Georgia
March 29, 2000
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northfield Laboratories Inc. on Form
10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jack J. Kogut, Chief
Financial Officer of Northfield Laboratories Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of Northfield Laboratories Inc.

Date: January 7, 2005

/s/ Jack J. Kogut
-------------------------
Jack J. Kogut
Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

WILLIAM H. LYNCH JR.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2722 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 70 DB 2020

Attorney Registration No. 39874

(Chester County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6 th day of January , 202 2

, upon consideration of the Report and

Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, William H. Lynch, Jr. is suspended from the

Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years . Respondent shall comply with all

the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board

. See Pa.R.D.E.

208(g).
EXHIBIT 13

<PAGE>
[LOGO]    Crisp
          Hughes
          Evans                       Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
          LLP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Affiliated worldwide through AGN International


                          Independent Auditors' Report
                          ----------------------------


To the Board of Directors
SFB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary


We have audited the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets of SFB Bancorp,
Inc. and  Subsidiary  (the  "Company") as of December 31, 1998 and 1999, and the
related consolidated statements of income,  comprehensive income,  stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial  statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We  conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  generally   accepted  auditing
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the  accounting  principles  used and  significant  estimates  made by
management,  as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated  financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects,  the financial position of the Company as of
December 31, 1998 and 1999,  and the results of their  operations and their cash
flows for the years then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.



                              /s/Crisp Hughes Evans LLP


Asheville, North Carolina
January 21, 2000


                                        32 Orange Street        828 254 2254
                                        PO Box 3049             Fax 828 254 6859
                                        Asheville, NC 28802     www.che-llp.com
| (logo)  WELLS                                                                      | Commercial Mortgage Servicing |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| **             **FARGO | D1086-120, 12th Floor         |
|                                                                                    | 550 South Tryon Street        |
|                                                                                    | Charlotte, NC 28202           |
|                                                                                    | 1-800-326-1334                |

 

 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2014, by and among GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through  Certificates Series 2014-GC22 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

·                A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from June 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) ,  and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

·                To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President                         

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|