61126 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices 

2See Letter from Thompson Hine representing 

the Minh Phu Group, Nha Trang Seafoods, 

Camimex, and Grobest, to Secretary of Commerce, 

regarding Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from 

Vietnam: Case Brief on behalf of Certain 

Respondents, dated, April 21, 2010 (‘‘Respondents 

Case Brief’’) at 44 for proprietary named used by 

importer. 

3See Respondents Case Brief at 24 for proprietary 

name used by importer. 

4See Respondents Case Brief at 44 for proprietary 

names used by importers. 

5See Respondents Case Brief at 44 for proprietary 

names used by importers. 

The Department will determine and the 

U.S. Bureau of Customs and Border 

Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. Except where the Court of 

International Trade has issued a 

preliminary injunction enjoining the 

liquidation of certain entries during the 

period of review, we intend to issue 

appropriate assessment instructions 

directly to CBP 15 days after publication 

of these amended final results of review. 

For a general discussion of the 

application of assessment rates, see 

Final Results, 75 FR at 47776. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

For all shipments of certain 

warmwater shrimp from Vietnam 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of these Amended 

Final Results, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

companies covered by this review, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate listed 

above; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies other than those 

covered by this review, the cash deposit 

rate will be the company-specific rate 

established for the most recent period; 

(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered 

in this review, a prior review, or the 

less-than-fair-value investigation, but 

the producer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the subject merchandise; and (4) if 

neither the exporter nor the producer is 

a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the investigation, the cash 

deposit rate will be 25.76 percent, the 

Vietnam-wide rate established in the 

less-than-fair-value investigation. These 

deposit requirements shall remain in 

effect until further notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this review period. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent increase in 

antidumping duties by the amount of 

antidumping duties reimbursed. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also is the only reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

These amended final results of 

administrative review and notice are 

issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(h), and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.224. 

Dated: September 29, 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24997 Filed 10–1–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Virginia Commonwealth University, 

School of Medicine; Notice of Decision 

on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of 

Scientific Instruments 

This is a decision pursuant to Section 

6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and 

Cultural Materials Importation Act of 

1966 (Pub. L. 89–651, as amended by 

Public Law 106–36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR 

part 301). Related records can be viewed 

between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 

3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

14th and Constitution Ave, NW., 

Washington, DC. 

Docket Number: 10–022. Applicant: 

Virginia Commonwealth University, 

School of Medicine, Richmond, VA 

23298–0551. Instrument: Electron 

Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI 

Company, the Netherlands. Intended 

Use: See notice at 75 FR 53271, August 

31, 2010. Comments: None received. 

Decision: Approved. Reasons: The 

instrument will be used to investigate 

the three dimensional structure of 

biological macromolecules, which will 

be observed under cryogenic conditions. 

We know of no instruments of 

equivalent scientific value to the foreign 

instruments described above, for such 

purposes as this is intended to be used, 

that was being manufactured in the 

United States at the time of its order. 

Dated: September 28, 2010. 

Gregory W. Campbell, 

Acting Director, Subsidies Enforcement 

Office, Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24834 Filed 10–1–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–904] 

Certain Activated Carbon From the 

People’s Republic of China: Extension 

of Time Limit for Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: October 4, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob 

Palmer or Kathleen Marksberry, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–9068 or (202) 482– 

7906, respectively. 

Background 

On May 29, 2009, Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published the 

notice of the initiation of the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

on certain activated carbon from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), 

covering the period April 1, 2008, 

through March 31, 2009. See Initiation 

of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Requests for Revocation in Part, 74 FR 

25711 (May 29, 2009) (‘‘Initiation 

Notice’’). 

On May 13, 2010, the Department 

published the preliminary results of this 

review. See Certain Activated Carbon 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Notice of Preliminary Results of the 

Second Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, and Preliminary 

Rescission in Part, 75 FR 26927 (May 

13, 2010) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). On 

July 13, 2010, the Department extended 

the final results by 45 days. See Certain 

Activated Carbon From the People’s 

Republic of China: Extension of Time 

Limit for Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 75 FR 39916 (July 13, 2010). 

The final results are currently due on 

October 25, 2010. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 191 / Monday, October 4, 2010 / Notices 61127 

1See Certain Non-Frozen Apple Juice Concentrate 

from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Preliminary Results of the New Shipper Review, 75 

FR 47270 (August 5, 2010). 

Extension of Time Limits for Final 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’), requires 

the Department to issue the final results 

in an administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order 120 days after 

the date on which the preliminary 

results are published. The Department 

may, however, extend the deadline for 

completion of the final results of an 

administrative review to 180 days if it 

determines it is not practicable to 

complete the review within the 

foregoing time period. See section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2). 

The Department requires additional 

time to complete this review because 

the Department must analyze and 

consider significant issues raised in the 

parties’ case and rebuttal briefs and 

fully analyze the parties’ postpreliminary surrogate value 

submissions. Thus, it is not practicable 

to complete this review by the current 

due date. Therefore, we are extending 

the time for the completion of the final 

results of this review by an additional 

15 days to November 9, 2010. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: September 28, 2010. 

Susan H. Kuhbach, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24830 Filed 10–1–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–855] 

Non–Frozen Apple Juice Concentrate 

from the People’s Republic of China: 

Extension of Time Limit for the Final 

Results of the New Shipper 

Antidumping Duty Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alexis Polovina, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 9, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3927. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 5, 2010, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published in 

the Federal Register its preliminary 

results of the new shipper review of the 

antidumping duty order on non–frozen 

apple juice concentrate from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1

This review covers the period June 1, 

2009, through January 20, 2010. The 

final results of review are currently due 

no later than October 28, 2010. 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results of Review 

Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 

19 CFR 351.214(i)(1), provide that the 

Department will issue the final results 

of review within 90 days after the date 

on which the preliminary results were 

issued. However, if the Secretary 

concludes that a new shipper review is 

extraordinarily complicated, the 

Secretary may extend the 90-day period 

to 150 days. See 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2). 

The Department determines that this 

new shipper review involves 

extraordinarily complicated 

methodological issues, including the 

continued evaluation of the most 

appropriate methodology for valuing 

labor. Therefore, in accordance with 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.214(i)(2), the Department is 

extending the time limit for the final 

results from 90 days to 150 days. 

Therefore, the final results will now be 

due no later than December 27, 2010. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: September 28, 2010. 

Susan H. Kuhbach, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24832 Filed 10–1–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–489–815] 

Light–Walled Rectangular Pipe and 

Tube from Turkey; Notice of Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On June 15, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published in the Federal 

Register the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on Light– 

Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from 

Turkey. See Light–Walled Rectangular 

Pipe and Tube from Turkey; Notice of 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 

33779 (June 15, 2010) (Preliminary 

Results). We gave interested parties an 

opportunity to comment on the 

Preliminary Results, but and received 

noneno comments. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tyler Weinhold, or Robert James, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–1121 or (202) 482– 

0649, respectively 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 15, 2010, the Department 

published the preliminary results of 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order covering light– 

walled rectangular pipe and tube from 

Turkey. See Preliminary Results. The 

parties subject to this review are 

Tosc ̧elik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. 

and Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. 

(collectively, Tosc ̧elik). The petitioners 

in this proceeding are Atlas Tube, Inc. 

and Searing Industries, Inc. 

(collectively, Petitioners). 

In the Preliminary Results, the 

Department stated that interested parties 

were to submit case briefs within 30 

days of publication of the Preliminary 

Results and rebuttal briefs within five 

days after the due date for filing case 

briefs. See Preliminary Results at 33782. 

No interested party submitted a case or 

rebuttal brief. On July 29, 2010, we 

released the verification report for the 

sales verification of Tosc ̧elik. See 

Memorandum from Tyler Weinhold and 

Mark Flessner to the file, ‘‘Verification 

of Sections A–C Questionnaire 

Responses submitted by Toscelik Profil 

ve Sac End. A.S. (Toscelik Profil) and its 

affiliated exporter Tosyali Dis Ticaret 

San. A.S. (Tosyali Dis Ticaret) 

(collectively Toscelik) in the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Light–Walled Rectangular 

Pipe and Tube From Turkey’’ 

(Verification Report). No interested 

party submitted comments on the 

report. We made no changes for the final 

results. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES