alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WESTERN OHIO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS FOR QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q**
I, John W. Raisbeck certify that:
1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Western OhioFinancial Corporation; 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluations; and  c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter, that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 14, 2004   /s/ John W. Raisbeck John W. Raisbeck, Chief Executive Officer   
25.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1997 
<CASH>                                             6,644 
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                 0 
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   3,600 
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     252 
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      106,864 
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            44,715 
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              44,442 
<LOANS>                                          260,743 
<ALLOWANCE>                                       (5,145)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   428,362 
<DEPOSITS>                                       311,824 
<SHORT-TERM>                                      41,276 
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                2,298 
<LONG-TERM>                                       27,330 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0 
<PREFERRED>                                            0 
<COMMON>                                           2,793 
<OTHER-SE>                                        41,093 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   428,362 
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   10,938 
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  4,602 
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     179 
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  15,719 
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 6,098 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 8,017 
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              7,702 
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        350 
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   336 
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    4,101 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    4,287 
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         4,287 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0 
<CHANGES>                                              0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       2,908 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       1.07 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       1.06 
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      7.67 
<LOANS-NON>                                        3,741 
<LOANS-PAST>                                         408 
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                       0 
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   11,117 
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   4,875 
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        188 
<RECOVERIES>                                         108 
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  5,145 
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               3,371 
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0 
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            1,774 
                                               


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001034760
<NAME> ZMAX CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,405,084
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,067,258
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,553,848
<PP&E>                                         347,290
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,870,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,291,697
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,729
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,566,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,870,077
<SALES>                                      1,425,360
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,425,360
<CGS>                                          667,098
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  667,098
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,598,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,366,479
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,206,699)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (14,206,699)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,206,699)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.58)
        

</TABLE>
#### Michael I. CHARLES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-0798.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 4, 2011.

Michael I. Charles, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(c)(4)(B).

BENTON, C.J., PADOVANO and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
#### STATE ex rel. James FULLER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1202.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re Fuller, James; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 179,480; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,-595-KH.

Denied.
#### Felix BELEVAN, Appellant, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION and The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Appellees.

No. 3D10-902.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 29, 2010.

Felix Belevan, in proper person.

Louis A. Gutierrez, Senior Attorney, Tallahassee, for appellee Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission.

Before ROTHENBERG, LAGOA, and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The claimant, Felix Belevan, appeals the final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission (“Commission”), holding that he is disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits. As the record below confirms the appeals referee’s findings, which were adopted by the Commission, that the claimant voluntarily resigned without good cause attributable to his employer, *see §*443.101(1)(a)(1), Fla. Stat. (2009); *Home Fuel Oil Co. v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n,*494 *237So.2d 268, 270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), we affirm the order under review.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,560
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          28,999
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                42,129
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    384,115
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         380,148
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,967
<LOANS>                                        560,830
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,773
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,048,153
<DEPOSITS>                                     602,840
<SHORT-TERM>                                   343,970
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             15,605
<LONG-TERM>                                     29,672
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,526
<PREFERRED>                                     15,281
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,048,153
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,365
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,982
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 5,724
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,071
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,429
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,048
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,594
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      250
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 891
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,087
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,087
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          813
<NET-INCOME>                                       274
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    1.37
<LOANS-NON>                                     10,948
<LOANS-PAST>                                     5,983
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   424
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 12,520
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,693
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       82
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,773
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,773
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,773
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2009-0960; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-29]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This action corrects an error in the effective date of a final rule that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on November 25, 2009, Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-29.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         0900 UTC, February 11, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Melinda Giddens, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5610.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## History

**Federal Register**                     Docket No. FAA-2009-0960, Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-29, published on November 25, 2009 (74 FR 61507), revokes Class E airspace at Liberty County Airport, Hinesville, GA. A typographical error was made in the effective date. It should read February 11, 2010, not February 22, 2010. This action corrects that error.                

## Correction to Final Rule

                    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, on page 61508, column 1, line 1, the                     **DATES**                     section is corrected to read:                     *Effective Date:*                     0900 UTC, February 11, 2010.                

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on January 26, 2010.

Myron A. Jenkins,

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.

[FR Doc. 2010-2520 Filed 2-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
## NUMBER 13

- 20

- 00 537

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

JOHNNY GONZALEZ , Appellant,

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.



## ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Silva Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court because a reporter’s record has not been timely

filed in this matter. The reporter’s record was originally due to be filed on February 1,

2021

. On May 24, 2021, the C lerk of the C ourt notified appellant’s newly appointed

counsel that the court reporter, Sharon Rodriguez, informed the court that appellant has2 failed to reques t the reporter’s record. To date, the reporter’s record has not been

received nor has a response from appellant’s counsel.

Accordingly, the Court abates and remands this cause to the trial court for further

proceedings

. The trial court shall make appropri ate findings under Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure 34.6(f) and 35.3, if necessary. Otherwise, the trial court shall

determine what steps are necessary to ensure the prompt preparation of a reporter's

record and shall enter any orders required to avoid f urther delay and to preserve the

parties’ rights.

The trial court shall prepare and file its findings and orders and cause them to be

included in a supplemental clerk's record which should be submitted to the Clerk of this

Court within thirty days from the date of this order.

P ER CURIAM

Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 7th d ay of July, 202 1

.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

VICTOR RAMOS

- OCASIO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16

- 3051

[February 28, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13

- 8019

CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and J. Woodson Isom, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, C IKLIN and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August1, 2014, by and among RBS COMMERICAL FUNDING INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSETMANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer,NCB, FSB, as Co-op Special Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC., asTrust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C21 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled allof its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of Februray 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President 

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7121 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7121

 To amend title 40, United States Code, to prohibit the Commission of 
 Fine Arts from exercising authority over non-Federal property in the 
             District of Columbia, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2018

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 40, United States Code, to prohibit the Commission of 
 Fine Arts from exercising authority over non-Federal property in the 
             District of Columbia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commission of Fine Arts District of 
Columbia Home Rule Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS FROM EXERCISING AUTHORITY 
              OVER NON-FEDERAL PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    (a) Limiting Authority Over Location of Statues, Fountains, and 
Monuments.--Section 9102(a)(1) of title 40, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``District of Columbia'' and inserting ``District 
of Columbia which are owned by the Federal Government''.
    (b) Clarification of Limitations on Authority.--Section 9102(c) of 
such title is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) Nonapplication.--The authority of the Commission under this 
section does not apply to any of the following:
            ``(1) The United States Capitol.
            ``(2) Any building of the Library of Congress.
            ``(3) Any building, property, or project which is owned by 
        the District of Columbia.
            ``(4) Any private building, property, or project.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### EVANS PRODUCTION CORPORATION,. Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Don J. SHAW, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

No. 17931.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 20, 1960.

R. G. Storey, Hubert D. Johnson, Dallas, Tex., Mahlon E. Lewis, Pittsburg,. Pa., for appellant.

Frank J. Scurlock, Dallas, Tex., for appellee.

Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and: JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

*928PER CURIAM.

On petition for rehearing, the appellant has attacked the opinion in this case as both factually and legally erroneous. The first factual error adverted to is that Shaw was the only witness to testify as to the value of his services whereas the opinion refers to “his witnesses,” implying that there were others. Secondly, the statement in note 11 of the opinion, 276 F.2d at page 319, to the effect that the Evans’ enterprise had profited several millions of dollars from its operations is said to be wrong. Upon re-examination, we conclude that both of these factual criticisms are well taken. At the same time, however, we do not regard either of these facts as crucial. The legal principles relied upon remain applicable to the case and require that the petition for rehearing be, and it is

Denied.