alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing  Agreement  dated as of March 1,2014, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, asTrustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and Situs Holdings, LLC, as OperatingAdvisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM2014-LC15 (the "Agreement").  Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.  A review of theactivities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.  To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1736 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1736

 To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 
1992 to provide for conjunctive use of surface and groundwater in Juab 
                             County, Utah.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2007

  Mr. Cannon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 
1992 to provide for conjunctive use of surface and groundwater in Juab 
                             County, Utah.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONJUNCTIVE USE OF SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER IN JUAB COUNTY, 
              UTAH.

    Section 202(a)(2) of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 
Adjustment Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-575) is amended by inserting 
``Juab,'' after ``Davis,''.
                                 <all>
```
#### McLOUTH STEEL CORPORATION, Appellant, v. HENRY *J.*KAISER COMPANY, Vereinigte Oesterreichische Eisen Und Stahlwerke Aktiengesellschaft, and Brassert Oxygen Technik A.G., Appellees.

Nos. 14910, 14011.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

March 28, 1960.

William B. Cudlip, T. Donald Wade of Dickinson, Wright, Davis, McKean & Cudlip, Detroit, Mich., John Vaughan Groner, Ronald F. Ball of Fish, Richardson & Neave, New York City, for appellant.

George E. Brand, George E. Brand, Jr., Detroit, Mich., John A. Dienner, Edward C. Grelle, Chicago, Ill., for appellees.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, WEICK, Circuit Judge, and BOYD, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court, and the Court being duly advised;

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Ralph M. Freeman, D.C., 175 F.Supp. 743, denying appellant’s motion for a summary judgment and granting appellees’ motion for a summary judgment.
855 A.2d 756

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Alvin TORRES, Appellee.

Supreme Court of *Pennsylvania.*

Submitted Jan. 13, 2004.

Decided Aug. 18, 2004.

Donald R. Totaro, Janna Rae Steinruck, for Com. of Pa.

Douglas Andrew Conrad, Reading, James J. Karl, for Alvin Torres.

Before CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, BAER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2004, the order of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas is reversed insofar as it declared the Registration of Sexual Offenders Act unconstitutional, and the case is remanded for further proceedings. *See Commonwealth v. Williams,*574 Pa. 487, 832 A.2d 962 (2003); *Commonwealth v. Maldonado,*576 Pa. 101, 838 A.2d 710 (2003).

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
#### Martin BREAUX, Jr. and Michelle Griffin, Individually and on behalf of their Minor Child, Martin Breaux, III v. Claire NEUMANN, M.D.

No. 2011-CC-0343.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2011.

In re Breaux III, Martin; Breaux Jr., Martin et al.; Griffin, Michelle; — Plaintiffs); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 677-930; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-C-958.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J., would grant.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 720 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 720

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2017

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to improve 
            attorney accountability, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. ATTORNEY ACCOUNTABILITY.

    (a) Sanctions Under Rule 11.--Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of 
Civil Procedure is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``may'' and inserting 
        ``shall'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``Rule 5'' and all that 
        follows through ``motion.'' and inserting ``Rule 5.''; and
            (3) in paragraph (4), by striking ``situated'' and all that 
        follows through the end of the paragraph and inserting 
        ``situated, and to compensate the parties that were injured by 
        such conduct. Subject to the limitations in paragraph (5), the 
        sanction shall consist of an order to pay to the party or 
        parties the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred as a 
        direct result of the violation, including reasonable attorneys' 
        fees and costs. The court may also impose additional 
        appropriate sanctions, such as striking the pleadings, 
        dismissing the suit, or other directives of a non-monetary 
        nature, or, if warranted for effective deterrence, an order 
        directing payment of a penalty into the court.''.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act or an amendment made 
by this Act shall be construed to bar or impede the assertion or 
development of new claims, defenses, or remedies under Federal, State, 
or local laws, including civil rights laws, or under the Constitution 
of the United States.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
644 A.2d 73

#### IN THE MATTER OF STEPHEN T. KEANE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

June 9, 1994.

ORDER

STEPHEN T. KEANE of SPRING LAKE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1963, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that STEPHEN T. KEANE is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

*3ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by STEPHEN T. KEANE, pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6, shall be restrained from disbursement except upon application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.
#### WEST CAMERON PORT, HARBOR AND TERMINAL DISTRICT v. LAKE CHARLES HARBOR & TERMINAL DIST., et al.

No. 2010-C-1800.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re West Cameron Port, Harbor and Terminal District; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Cameron, 38th Judicial District Court Div: 0, No. 10-17271; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 09-509.

Denied.

KNOLL, J., would grant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-26-1997
<CASH>                                             573
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,385
<ALLOWANCES>                                       319
<INVENTORY>                                     22,161
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,802
<PP&E>                                          51,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 112,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,273
<BONDS>                                         48,248
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     13,813
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,491
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   112,128
<SALES>                                         67,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,729
<CGS>                                           51,861
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,861
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,610
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,975
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,375
<INCOME-TAX>                                       612
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                764
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       764
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Terrence K. BENOIT v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-2863.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Benoit, Terrence K.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Iberia, 16th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 04-CR-1005; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 09-00330.

Denied.
1The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court of

the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-3814

___________

William R. Cody, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

Douglas Weber, and others as yet * District Court for the 

unknown or undetermined, who are or * District of South Dakota.

were officers, employees, and/or agents *

of SDSP, and/or the State of South * [UNPUBLISHED]

Dakota Department of Corrections *

(DOC), and/or the State of *

South Dakota, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: June 11, 2001

Filed: June 25, 2001

___________

Before BOWMAN and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and KOPF,1 District Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.
2The Honorable John B. Jones, United States District Judge for the District of

South Dakota.

-2-

William R. Cody brought this prisoner civil rights action, alleging numerous

claims having to do, inter alia, with the pricing of his pre-stamped envelopes and with

retaliation for his filing of grievances. The District Court2 denied Cody's motion to

amend the complaint and granted defendant Douglas L. Weber's motion for summary

judgment. Cody appeals, challenging both of the court's rulings.

Having reviewed the case, we find no abuse of discretion in the denial of Cody's

motion to amend. Nor do we find any error in the grant of summary judgment for

defendant.

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Fisher
Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Colleen B. Brown, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 12, 2010



/s/ Colleen B. BrownColleen B. BrownPresident and Chief Executive Officer
NO. 01-14-01015-CV

______________________________________________________________________________

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT

HOUSTON, TEXAS

______________________________________________________________________________

SANDRA NZE

Appellant

V.

UCHENNA NWABUEZE

Appellee

______________________________________________________________________________

APPELLANT'S RESPONSE TO APPELLE'S MOTION

TO DISMISS APPEAL AS MOOT 

Appellant, Sandra Nze, through counsel, Nwadi Nwogu asks the Court to deny Appellee's 

motion to dismiss appeal as moot and retain matter on the Court's docket.

On March 26, 2015, Appellant filed with the court, a brief detailing the lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction by the justice court that rendered judgment in the eviction matter. The 

judgment of the justice court and the judgment affirmed by the County Court on December 31, 

2014 are void.

Appellee's brief was due on June 25, 2015 but is yet to be filed.

On June 10, 2015, Appellee served Appellant with a Writ of Possession based on the void 

order of the court requiring her to vacate her property within 24 hours. Appellant sought 

protection from the court through a Writ of Mandamus and a Motion for Emergency Stay of the 

ACCEPTED

01-14-01015-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

6/26/2015 5:48:20 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/26/2015 5:48:20 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Writ of Possession - Case No. 01-15-00526-CV. The Court denied the motion and petition. On

June 18, 2015, Appellant filed a Motion for Rehearing of the Court's Opinion and paid the

applicable fees. That Motion is still pending with the Court. Appellant also requested from the

Court a consolidation of the matters. On June 22, Appellee executed his Writ of Possession.

Appellant requests the Court to issue its opinion striking the order on which the writ is

based as void, make an order restraining Appellee from selling the property and restore

Appellant to her rightful home pending the equitable division of the property by the divorce

court.

The matter before this Court is not Moot. Appelle's arguments and allegations are untrue.

The issue is whether the Justice Court had jurisdiction to decide title to the parties' property and

the answer is NO.

For these reasons, Appellant asks the Court to deny Appellee's motion to dismiss this

appeal as moot and retain Appellant's suit on the Court's docket.

Respectfully submitted,

ODUNZE NWOGU LAW GROUP, P.C.

By: /s/ NWADI NWOGU

NWADI NWOGU

Texas Bar No. 24074826

6001 SAVOY DRIVE

SUITE 302

HOUSTON, Texas 77036

Tel. (713)334-8080

Fax. (713)334-3533

Email address: NWADI@ONLAWGROUP.COM

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on June 26, 2015 a true and correct copy of this document was served via email facsimile transmission on Carlette White.

/s/ NWADI NWOGU 

NWADI NWOGU
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of termination.

# SUMMARY:

After consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture and the General Services Administration, we, the Department of the Interior, have terminated the Sporting Conservation Council.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bruce Decker, Chief, Division of Program and Partnership Support, External Affairs, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4501 N. Fairfax Drive, Mailstop EA-3103, Arlington, Virginia 22203; telephone 703-358-2521.

Dated: January 7, 2010.

Ken Salazar,

Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 2010-2497 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24832]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-855]


Non-Frozen Apple Juice Concentrate from the People's Republic of 
China: Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results of the New Shipper 
Antidumping Duty Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexis Polovina, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3927.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 5, 2010, the Department of Commerce (``Department'') 
published in the Federal Register its preliminary results of the new 
shipper review of the antidumping duty order on non-frozen apple juice 
concentrate from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'').\1\ This 
review covers the period June 1, 2009, through January 20, 2010. The 
final results of review are currently due no later than October 28, 
2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Non-Frozen Apple Juice Concentrate from the 
People's Republic of China: Notice of Preliminary Results of the New 
Shipper Review, 75 FR 47270 (August 5, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Review

    Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(1), provide that the Department will issue 
the final results of review within 90 days after the date on which the 
preliminary results were issued. However, if the Secretary concludes 
that a new shipper review is extraordinarily complicated, the Secretary 
may extend the 90-day period to 150 days. See 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2).
    The Department determines that this new shipper review involves 
extraordinarily complicated methodological issues, including the 
continued evaluation of the most appropriate methodology for valuing 
labor. Therefore, in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the 
Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2), the Department is extending the time 
limit for the final results from 90 days to 150 days. Therefore, the 
final results will now be due no later than December 27, 2010.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: September 28, 2010.
Susan H. Kuhbach,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-24832 Filed 10-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
4500 Park Granada                                           (LOGO) COUNTRYWIDE
Calabassa, California 91302
(818) 225-300O



April 22, 1997

Grant Thornton LLP
1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700
Los Angeles, CA 90017

Gentlemen:

As of and for the year ended February 28, 1997,  Countrywide  Credit Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (which includes its wholly-owned  subsidiary,  Countrywide
Home Loans, Inc.) ("the Company') has complied in all material respects with the
minimum  servicing  standards set forth in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of
America's UNIFORM SINGLE  ATTESTATION FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS.  As of and for this
same period,  the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions
policy in the amount of $30,000,000.







/s/Carlos M. Garcia
Carlos M. Garcia
Managing Director-Finance
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer