alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1




Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE






The undersigned, Mark Kaczynski, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:
  (1)           The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 1999, as amended and as supplemented by the 2014-A SUBI Servicing Supplement, dated as of June 18, 2014 (as supplemented, the “Agreement”), by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT, as titling trust, NILT Trust, as UTI beneficiary, and the Company, as servicer, to be conducted under his supervision; and
  (2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
  This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued asset-backed securities.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 15th day of June, 2016.


/s/ Mark Kaczynski_________________


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Keith LANDRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D10-3809.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 15, 2011.

Rehearing Denied June 2, 2011.

*1161Keith Landry, Lake City, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Keith Landry, challenges the trial court’s denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence. Pursuant to Appellant’s negotiated plea of nolo conten-dere to the offense of second-degree murder,1 the trial court sentenced him to seventeen years’ prison, followed by twenty-five years’ probation, with a three-year minimum mandatory for the use of a firearm. After his release from prison, he served over eight years of probation before committing a violation of probation. The trial court revoked his probation and imposed a sentence of twenty-five years’ prison with credit for time served, followed by ten years’ probation, and stayed the incarcerative portion of the sentence, placing Appellant on probation.

Appellant’s original forty-two year sentence was a legal one under section 775.082(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), for a first-degree felony punishable by life.2 His original sentence was a probationary split sentence and, following revocation of probation, the trial court was authorized to impose any sentence it could have originally imposed. § 948.06(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2009); *see Franklin v. State,*545 So.2d 851 (1989). Further, Appellant is es-topped from asserting the illegality of the sentence after he has knowingly taken advantage of its benefits. *See Taylor v. State,*690 So.2d 686, 686 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

The trial court imposed a legal sentence following Appellant’s violation of probation and he is entitled to no relief regarding his original sentence. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

MONACO, C.J., GRIFFIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.

1

. § 782.04(2), Fla. Stat. (1989).

2

. By virtue of a statutory anomaly, a person convicted of a life felony on or after October 1, 1983, and before July 1, 1995, was punishable "by a term of imprisonment for life or by a term of imprisonment not exceeding 40 years,” although one convicted of a first-degree felony punishable by life could receive a sentence exceeding forty years. § 775.082(3)(a)2., Fla. Stat. (2009). *See Holloway v. State,*668 So.2d 627, 629 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (citing *Sterling v. State,*584 So.2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)).
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7247 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7247

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify the 
    authority of MA organizations to provide waivers from Medicare 
           Advantage plans' prior authorization requirements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2018

    Mr. Brady of Texas (for himself and Mr. Shimkus) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 
 and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify the 
    authority of MA organizations to provide waivers from Medicare 
           Advantage plans' prior authorization requirements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Incentivizing Shared Risk in 
Medicare Advantage Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF MA ORGANIZATIONS TO PROVIDE WAIVERS FROM MEDICARE 
              ADVANTAGE PLANS' PRIOR AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 1857(e) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-27(e)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Authority to provide waivers from plan prior 
        authorization requirements.--In the case of an MA organization 
        with a contract under this section that applies a prior 
        authorization requirement with respect to any item or service 
        covered under the Medicare Advantage plan offered by such 
        organization, such organization may provide for a waiver from 
        such requirement for any provider of services or supplier, as 
        specified by the organization, furnishing such an item or 
        service, including a provider of services or supplier that 
        participates in a risk-sharing arrangement or value-based 
        payment arrangement, as such terms are defined by the 
        organization.''.
                                 <all>
```
860 A.2d 923

#### IN THE MATTER OF STEPHEN D. LANDFIELD, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 1, 2004.

ORDER

STEPHEN D. LANDFIELD of MORRIS PLAINS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, having been ordered by the Court on May 19, 2004, to be temporarily suspended from the practice of law effective June 18, 2004, pursuant to Ewfe.l:20-15(k) for failure to comply with the fee arbitration determination in District Docket No. X-03-090F (Lake);

And the Court having stayed the suspension Order to permit the Disciplinary Review Board to consider an installment payment plan proposed by respondent to satisfy his financial obligations to his client and to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having recommended to the Court that respondent be required to satisfy the arbitration award and pay the sanction to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee in full and not on the schedule proposed by respondent;

And respondent having failed to comply with the determination of the District X Fee Arbitration Committee in the *Lake*matter or to pay the sanction to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having recommended to the Court on September 24, 2004, pursuant to *Rule*l:20-15(k) that respondent be temporarily suspended from practice for failure to comply with the determinations of the District X Committee in two additional matters that require respondent to refund payments made by clients;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that STEPHEN D. LANDFIELD be temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective November 1, 2004, and until the further Order of the Court; provided, however, *29that this Order shall be vacated if before the effective date of the suspension, respondent satisfies in full the District X Fee Arbitration Committee determinations in the *Lake*(X-03-090F, $1,000), *Albertson*(X-04-003F, $2,000), and *Rizzo*(X-03-114F, $2,500) matters, and pays a sanction in the amount of $100 to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee as assessed in the *Lake*matter.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61472-61473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24965]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-2893-000]


SJH Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

September 29, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
SJH Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an 
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 19, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access

[[Page 61473]]

who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b5d5e495854757772757e486e6b6b74696f5b7d7e6978357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="662023342529080a0f080335131616091412260003140548010910">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24965 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer**





In
      connection with the Annual Report On Form 10-K (the “Report”) under the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Atlantic Express Transportation Corp. (the
      “Company”), I, Nathan Schlenker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:





(i)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),
      as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
            Nathan
                SchlenkerNathan
                Schlenker*Chief
                Financial Officer*





Date:
      September 26, 2008





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
      be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing.
EXHIBIT 12.1  STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO
OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
 LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST / LIBERTY PROPERTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Amounts in thousands except ratio amounts)
 Six months ended 
June 30, 2009Earnings before fixed charges:Income before allocation of minority interest
and income from investments in unconsolidated
subsidiaries
    
    $
    88,782Add: Interest expense
    
    
    72,920Depreciation expense on capd interest
    
    
    674Amortization of deferred
financing costs
    
    
    2,500Earnings before fixed charges
    
    $
    164,876Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    72,920Amortization of deferred financing charges
    
    
    2,500Capitalized interest
    
    
    5,415Fixed charges
    
    
    80,835Preferred share distributions
    
    
    Preferred unit distributions
    
    
    10,506Combined fixed charges
    
    $
    91,341Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    2.04Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
    
    
    1.81
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>  
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         164,772
<SECURITIES>                                   198,357
<RECEIVABLES>                                  282,453
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,499
<INVENTORY>                                    131,902
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               889,566
<PP&E>                                         231,029
<DEPRECIATION>                                  91,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,390,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          202,638
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           196
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,187,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,390,229
<SALES>                                        632,469
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               632,469
<CGS>                                          226,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  226,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               242,255
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (10,887)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                174,172
<INCOME-TAX>                                    62,715
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            111,457
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   111,457
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6704

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

WILLIE JEROME MACKINS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg, 

District Judge. (3:97-cr-00022-LHT-4) 

Submitted: July 10, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009 

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Willie Jerome Mackins, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Willie Mackins appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. United States v. Mackins, No. 

3:97-cr-00022-LHT-4 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 2009). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant



Parent
------

FirstBank NW Corp.

                                          Percentage         Jurisdiction or
Subsidiaries                             of Ownership     State of Incorporation
------------                             ------------     ----------------------

FirstBank Northwest (1),                    100%               Washington
with its subsidiaries:
Tri-Star Financial Corporation  (1)         100%               Idaho
Pioneer Development Corporation (2)         100%               Oregon


The operations of the Registrant's subsidiaries are included in the
Registrant's consolidated financial statements.

(1) These subsidiaries were acquired by the parent effective July 1, 1997.
(2) This subsidiary was acquired by the parent effective October 31, 2003.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 728 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from issuing oil and gas leases 

on portions of the Outer Continental Shelf located off the coast of 

New Jersey. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 30, 2017 

Mr. LOBIONDO (for himself, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. LANCE, and Mr. 

SMITH of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from issuing oil 

and gas leases on portions of the Outer Continental 

Shelf located off the coast of New Jersey. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OIL AND GAS LEASING OFF 

4 THE COAST OF NEW JERSEY. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—The Secretary of the Interior 

6 shall not issue a lease, permit, or license for the explo7 ration for or extraction of oil or gas on or from submerged 

8 lands described in subsection (b). 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 728 IH

1 (b) LANDS DESCRIBED.—The submerged lands with 

2 respect to which subsection (a) applies are all submerged 

3 lands seaward from the landward boundary of the Outer 

4 Continental Shelf that lie within 125 miles of any point 

5 of the coastline of the State of New Jersey. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

To the Board of Directors
Pacific Systems Control Technology, Inc.
And Subsidiaries:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Pacific Systems Control Technology, Inc., and Subsidiaries (the "Company"), as of December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2001.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audit, the accompanying consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2001 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  We have not audited the financial statements of Pacific Systems Control Technology, Inc. for any period subsequent to December 31, 2001.

The accompanying financial statements have not been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  The Company had limited cash reserves at December 31, 2001 and based on management's current cash flow estimates, will not have sufficient cash to meet obligations over the next twelve months without additional sources of capital.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

MOSS ADAMS LLP



/s/ Moss Adams LLP

San Francisco, California
March 6, 2002