alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

OWOSSO CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                            Three Months Ended                   Nine Months Ended
                                                    ------------------------------------  ---------------------------------
                                                        July 29,          July 30,           July 29,          July 30,
                                                          2001              2000               2001              2000
<S>                                                        <C>               <C>                <C>               <C>
BASIC:

Net loss available for common shareholders               $(1,295,000)         $ (85,000)      $(4,668,000)       $(351,000)
                                                    ================= ==================  ================  ===============

Weighted average number
    of common shares outstanding                           5,874,000          5,850,000         5,863,000        5,842,000
                                                    ================= ==================  ================  ===============

Basic earnings (loss) per common share                       $ (0.22)           $ (0.01)          $ (0.80)         $ (0.06)
                                                    ================= ==================  ================  ===============


DILUTED:

Net loss available for common shareholders               $(1,295,000)         $ (85,000)      $(4,668,000)       $(351,000)
                                                    ================= ==================  ================  ===============

Weighted average number
    of common shares outstanding                           5,874,000          5,850,000         5,863,000        5,842,000

Dilutive effect of stock options                                   -                  -                 -                -
                                                    ----------------- ------------------  ----------------  ---------------

Weighted average number
    of common shares outstanding                           5,874,000          5,850,000         5,863,000        5,842,000
                                                    ================= ==================  ================  ===============

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share                     $ (0.22)           $ (0.01)          $ (0.80)         $ (0.06)
                                                    ================= ==================  ================  ===============

</TABLE>
(logo) Rialto 

CAPITAL

 

2015 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement ") dated as of May I , 2014 by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National

 

Association as General Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB as Co-op Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Ce1tificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor and Wilmington Trust, National Association as Trustee relating to the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2014-C20, Commercial Mo1tgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2014-C20 (WFRBS 2014-C20)

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the "Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

 

1. All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2. A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period") in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there as been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, Managing Director

 

Date: March 1, 2016
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jon Eberle, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HMN Financial, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: August 10, 2004                    By   /s/ Jon Eberle
                                               Senior Vice President/CFO
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1696 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1696

  To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian 
  Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 
  tribe to determine blood quantum requirement for membership in that 
                                 Tribe.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2007

  Mr. Reyes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian 
  Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 
  tribe to determine blood quantum requirement for membership in that 
                                 Tribe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BLOOD QUANTUM REQUIREMENT DETERMINED BY TRIBE.

    Section 108(a)(2) of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and 
Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (25 U.S.C. 1300g-7(2)) 
is amended by striking ``if the descendant'' and all that follows 
through the end of the paragraph and inserting ``if the descendant is 
enrolled by the tribe''.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

September 11, 2012

Before

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 10-3474

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

TERRILL A. RICKMON, SR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Central District of Illinois.

No. 09-10007-001

Michael M. Mihm,

Judge.

O R D E R

After remand by the Supreme Court for further consideration in light of the Supreme

Court's decision in Dorsey v. United States, 567 U.S. —, 132 S. Ct. 2321 (2012), and considering

the parties' joint Circuit Rule 54 Statement, we hereby VACATE defendant Terrill Rickmon’s

sentence and REMAND this case to the district court for re-sentencing under the Fair

Sentencing Act of 2010 consistent with Dorsey.

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2014-3 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank, National Association.



/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015
648 A.2d 722

#### IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES J. BENJAMIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

November 2, 1994.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that CHARLES J. BENJAMIN of CLIFFSIDE PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, effective June 6, 1994, by Order of this Court dated May 10, 1994, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24
- 0007 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TRAVIS CLINTON PLANTIKO,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 25 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 19 2024

09/19/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0007
#### Kieta ALEXANDER, Ronald Clayton, Sr. and Gloria Travis v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, Norfolk Southern Railway Co., Alabama Great Southern Railway Company, Celanese, Ltd., Noveon, Inc., the Commercial Traffic Company and Union Tank Car Company Larry A. Cager, et al. v. Norfolk Southern Railroad Company et al. Michael Noble, et al. v. Norfolk Southern Railroad Corporation, et al. Audry T. Colin, et al. v. Norfolk Southern Corporation, et al. Anthony Congress, et al. v. Celtran, Inc., et al.

No. 2011-C-2793.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

*1278In re Kieta Alexander, et al.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Rehearing of this court’s action dated March 9, 2012; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. I, Nos. 2002-14666, 2002-14722, 2002-14850, 2002-14861 and 2002-14881; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit Nos. 2011-CA-0452, 2011-CA-0458, 2011-CA-0454, 2011-CA-0455 and 2011-CA-0456.

Rehearing denied.

JOHNSON and KNOLL, JJ., would grant.
#### HEAD *v.*CITY OF ALMA *et al.*

Refusal, on liabeas corpus, to discharge the applicant from custody under sentence for violating an ordinance prohibiting running of cattle at large *on the*streets of a municipality, was not error.

Habeas Corpus, 29 C. J. p. 37, n. 62.

No. 6232.

March 14, 1928.

Habeas corpus. Before Judge Reed. Bacon superior court. December 22, 1926.

*I. J.*Bussell, for plaintiff. *Q. A.*Williamsfor defendants.

Gilbert, J.

The exception is to a judgment on habeas corpus, refusing to discharge the applicant from the custody of the mar*138shal of Alma. The petition makes the following case: B. J. Head was sentenced after being convicted of violating a municipal ordinance which prohibited the “running at large of cattle” on the streets of the city. Petitioner contends that the ordinance is void, “for the reason that the same was improperly, illegally, and wrongfully passed, and not passed as required by the charter granted the city.” The remaining allegations are immaterial. No demurrer was filed. The defendants responded, denying that the ordinance was void, and showing lawful cause of detention. The evidence for petitioner showed his conviction under the ordinance, and his refusal to serve the sentence either by paying the fine assessed or otherwise. Evidence for the respondents authorized the finding that the ordinance was adopted in full compliance with the requirements of the charter, and was not void. The court did not err in refusing to discharge the petitioner and in remanding him to the custody of the marshal.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### PORT OF JACKSONVILLE MARITIME AD HOC COMMITTEE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Admiral J. B. HAYES, Commandant, United States Coast Guard et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 80-5105.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 16, 1980.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Aug. 19,1980.

Mahoney, Hadlow & Adams, Guy 0. Farmer, II, Thomas M. Baumer, Michael B. Wedner, Jacksonville, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

Mathews, Osborne, Ehrlick, McNatt, Go-belman & Cobb, John E. Mathews, Jr., James E. Cobb, Julie H. Kuntz, Jacksonville, Fla., for Jacksonville Transportation Authority.

Robert S. Yerkes, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., for Hayes.

Before GODBOLD, TJOFLAT and SAM D. JOHNSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Ad Hoc Committee sought judicial review in the district court1 of a decision by the Coast Guard to grant a permit for the construction of a fixed highway bridge across the St. Johns River and Mill Cove, near Jacksonville, Florida. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants.

The decision of the Coast Guard is affirmed on the basis of the district court opinion, 485 F.Supp. 741 (M.D.Fla.1980).2

AFFIRMED.

1

. Pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706.

2

. Appellant contends that the Commandant did not properly delegate his authority to issue the bridge permit to his Chief Bridge Officer, and thus that the permit is invalid. Appellant further contends that the district court did not, and could not on the record before it, resolve this question. We do not decide this issue, as appellant did not raise it below and thus is precluded from raising it before this court. *See Higginbotham*v. *Ford Motor Co.,*540 F.2d 762, 768 n.10 (5th Cir, 1976); *Excavators and*Erectors, *Inc. v. Bullard Engineers, Inc.,*489 F.2d 318, 320 (5th Cir. 1973); *Evans v. Triple R Welding & Oil Field Maintenance Corp,,*472 F.2d 713, 716 (5th Cir. 1973).
#### Melvin JACKSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 17807.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Nov. 18, 1963.

Decided Dec. 12, 1963.

Petition for Rehearing en Banc Denied May 25, 1964.

Mr. Forbes W. Blair, Washington, D. C. (appointed by this court), for appellant.

Mr. John A. Terry, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., Frank Q. Nebeker and William H. Collins, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before Fahy, Washington and Wright, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction of second degree murder. Able court-appointed counsel urges a number of contentions, which we have carefully considered. But we find no error affecting substantial rights. The judgment of the District Court will be

Affirmed.

Circuit Judge WRIGHT took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
#### In re Vincent Piazza SCALLAN.

No. 2010-OB-2173.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 6, 2010.

|,ON APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR

PER CURIAM*

After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude petitioner, Vincent Piazza Seallan, is eligible to be conditionally admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana, subject to the following conditions:

1. The term of this conditional admission shall be for five years from the date of admission.

2. During the period of this conditional admission, petitioner shall be monitored by the Lawyers Assistance Program (LAP).

3. Petitioner shall be responsible for ensuring that monthly reports of his progress and participation in LAP are forwarded to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

4. Within forty-five days prior to the expiration of the conditional admission, the Executive Director of LAP shall forward to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (a) a final report of petitioner’s progress and participation in LAP, and (b) a recommendation regarding the need for petitioner’s continued participation in LAP.

5. Within thirty days prior to the expiration of the conditional admission, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel shall file a report in this court in which it shall recommend whether the conditional admission shall be allowed to terminate or shall be extended.

|26. Petitioner shall cooperate with LAP and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and shall comply with any and all requirements imposed upon him by LAP and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

Should petitioner fail to make a good faith effort to satisfy these conditions, or should he commit any misconduct during the period of probation, his conditional right to practice may be terminated or he may be subjected to other discipline pursuant to the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement.

CONDITIONAL ADMISSION GRANTED.

*173JOHNSON and CLARK, JJ., would deny admission at this time and appoint a commissioner.

*

 Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61860-61861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25051]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Women Veterans; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee 
on Women Veterans will meet October 26-28, 2010, at the Hilton Garden 
Inn, in the Georgetown Ballroom, 815 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC, 
from 8:30 a.m. until 4 p.m. each day. The meeting is open to the 
public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs regarding the needs of women Veterans with respect to health 
care, rehabilitation, compensation, outreach, and other programs and 
activities administered by VA designed to meet such needs. The 
Committee makes recommendations to the Secretary regarding such 
programs and activities.
    The agenda will include updates on recommendations from the 2010 
report; updates from the Veterans Benefits Administration, the Veterans 
Health Administration, the National Cemetery

[[Page 61861]]

Administration; and briefings on mental health, prosthetic services for 
women Veterans, readjustment counseling, women Veterans' legislative 
issues, special health initiatives, women Veterans' research, rural 
health, and homeless initiatives for women Veterans.
    Interested persons may attend, appear before, or file statements 
with the Committee. Any member of the public wishing to attend or 
provide written statements should contact Ms. Shannon L. Middleton at 
the Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Women Veterans (00W), 
810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, or phone at (202) 461-
6193, fax at (202) 273-7092, and e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#77474720371a161e1b59011659101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="52626205123f333b3e7c24337c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>. Written 
statements must be filed before the meeting, or within 10 days after 
the meeting.

    Dated: September 30, 2010.


    By Direction of the Secretary.
Vivian Drake,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-25051 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>