**UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

**FORM 10-K**

(Mark One)

**x****  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021or**

**o**** ****TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**For the transition period from _____ to _____Commission file number of the issuing entity: 333-172366-14**

**Central Index Key Number of the issuing entity:0001607641**

**Wells Fargo Commercial MortgageTrust 2014-LC16**

**(exact name of the issuing entity as specified in itscharter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the depositor: 0000850779**

**Wells Fargo Commercial MortgageSecurities, Inc.**

**(exact name of the depositor as specified in its charter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0000740906**

**Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001541468**

**Ladder Capital Finance LLC**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0000729153**

**NatWest Markets Plc**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

**(formerly known as TheRoyal Bank of Scotland plc)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001541615**

**RBS Financial Products Inc.**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001592182**

**LMF Commercial, LLC**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

**(formerly known as RialtoMortgage Finance, LLC)**

** **

| **New York****(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization of**

**the issuing entity)** | **38-3926125**

**38-3926126**

**38-3926127**

**(I.R.S. Employer**

**Identification Numbers)** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**c/o Wells Fargo Bank, National Association**

**as Certificate Administrator**

**9062 Old Annapolis Road**

**Columbia, MD**

**(Address of principalexecutive offices of the issuing entity)**

**21045**

**(Zip Code)**

**Registrant’s telephone number,including area code:**

**(704) 374-6161**

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each  exchange on which registered |
|---------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| None                |              |                                       |

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of theAct:  None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-knownseasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  o Yes ⌧No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required tofile reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  o Yes ⌧No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filedall reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periodthat the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has beensubject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  ⌧ Yes oNo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submittedelectronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every InteractiveData File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and postsuch files).

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filerspursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is notcontained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’sknowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated byreference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form10-K.   

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a largeaccelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smallerreporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,”and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large acceleratedfiler        o                                                                                                       Accelerated filer                                     o

Non-acceleratedfiler          ⌧  (Do not check ifa smaller reporting company)                          Smaller reportingcompany                    o

                                                                                                                                                       Emerging growthcompany                    o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if theregistrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complyingwith any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant toSection 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed areport on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectivenessof its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of theSarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firmthat prepared or issued its audit report.  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shellcompany (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  o Yes ⌧ No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-votingcommon equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price atwhich the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price ofsuch common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s mostrecently completed second fiscal quarter.

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed alldocuments and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securitiesunder a plan confirmed by a court.  oYes oNo

Not applicable.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of theregistrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Not applicable.

**DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE**

** **

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated byreference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) intowhich the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders;(2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuantto Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documentsshould be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report tosecurity holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

Not applicable.

 

** **

**EXPLANATORY NOTES**

The Montgomery Mall Mortgage Loan, whichconstituted approximately 5.5% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as ofits cut-off date, is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loancombination that includes the Montgomery Mall Mortgage Loan and one other paripassu loan, which is not an asset of the issuing entity.  This loancombination, including the Montgomery Mall Mortgage Loan, is being serviced andadministered pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which isincorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

The Exhibit Index describesexhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on theExhibit Index) with respect to the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 2.3% of the asset pool of theissuing entity as of its cut-off date.  The JL Holdings-Burger KingPortfolio-90 Mortgage Loan is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of aloan combination that includes the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90Mortgage Loan, one other pari passu loan and one subordinate companion loan,which are not assets of the issuing entity.  The other pari passu portionof the loan combination was securitized in the COMM 2014-LC15 Mortgage Trusttransaction, Commission File Number 333-193376-03 (the “COMM 2014-LC15Transaction”).  This loan combination, including the JLHoldings-Burger King Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan, is being serviced andadministered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM2014-LC15 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 tothis Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Exhibit Index describesexhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on the ExhibitIndex) with respect to the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan, which constitutedapproximately 12.3% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as of its cut-offdate.  The Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan is an asset of the issuingentity and is part of a loan combination that includes the Woodbridge CenterMortgage Loan and one other pari passu loan, which is not an asset of theissuing entity.  The other pari passu portion of the loan combination wassecuritized in the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2014-C20 transaction,Commission File Number 333-172366-13 (the “WFRBS 2014-C20 Transaction”). This loan combination, including the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan, isbeing serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreementfor the WFRBS 2014-C20 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference asExhibit 4.3 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Exhibit Index describesexhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on theExhibit Index) with respect to the Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan, whichconstituted approximately 5.1% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as ofits cut-off date.  The Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan is an asset ofthe issuing entity and is part of a loan combination that includes the PacificDesign Center Mortgage Loan and one other pari passu loan, which is not anasset of the issuing entity.  This loan combination, including the PacificDesign Center Mortgage Loan, was serviced under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement for the issuing entity prior to the closing of the securitization ofthe other pari passu portion of the Pacific Design Center loan combination inthe COMM 2014-CCRE18 Mortgage Trust transaction, Commission File Number333-193376-07 (the “COMM 2014-CCRE18 Transaction”).  After theclosing of the COMM 2014-CCRE18 Transaction on June 27, 2014, this loancombination, including the Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan was, and willcontinue to be, serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicingagreement with respect to the COMM 2014-CCRE18 Transaction, which isincorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.4 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Exhibit Index describesexhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on theExhibit Index) with respect to the Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan, whichconstituted approximately 1.6% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as ofits cut-off date.  The Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan is an asset of theissuing entity and is part of a loan combination that includes the Oak CourtMall Mortgage Loan and one other pari passu loan, which is not an asset of theissuing entity.  This loan combination, including the Oak Court MallMortgage Loan, was serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the issuingentity prior to the closing of the securitization of the other pari passuportion of the Oak Court Mall loan combination in the WFRBS Commercial MortgageTrust 2014-C21 transaction, Commission File Number 333-177891-08 (the “WFRBS2014-C21 Transaction”).  After the closing of the WFRBS 2014-C21Transaction on August 12, 2014, this loan combination, including the Oak CourtMall Mortgage Loan was, and will continue to be, serviced and administeredpursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement with respect to the WFRBS2014-C21 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.5 to thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K.

The master servicer of a poolingand servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement also functions as theprimary servicer of the related mortgage loans serviced and administeredpursuant to such agreement unless a separate primary servicer is identifiedherein.  If this report does not identify a separate primary servicer, theservicer compliance statement provided by the master servicer under any suchagreement also encompasses its responsibilities as primary servicer of therelated mortgage loan or mortgage loans.

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation is the master servicer and certificate administrator of themortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and theprimary servicer of the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan, the JL Holdings-BurgerKing Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan and the Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan. As aresult, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is a “servicer” as defined inItem 1108(a)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, in the capacities described above,because it is servicing mortgage loans that constituted 10% or more of theassets of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date.  The assessments ofcompliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestation reportsand servicer compliance statements delivered by Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation in the capacities described above are listed in the Exhibit Index.

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is the custodian ofthe mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, theWoodbridge Center Mortgage Loan, the Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan, theJL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan and the Oak Court MallMortgage Loan.  As a result, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is aservicing function participant in the capacities described above, because it isservicing mortgage loans that constituted 5% or more of the assets of theissuing entity as of its cut-off date.  The assessments of compliance withapplicable servicing criteria and accountants’ attestation reports delivered byWells Fargo Bank, National Association in the capacities described above arelisted in the Exhibit Index.

Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC isthe special servicer of the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan, the Pacific DesignCenter Mortgage Loan and the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 MortgageLoan. As a result, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC is a “servicer” as defined inItem 1108(a)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, in the capacities described above,because it is servicing mortgage loans that constituted 10% or more of theassets of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date.  The assessments ofcompliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestation reportsand servicer compliance statements delivered by Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC inthe capacities described above are listed in the Exhibit Index.

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC is the operating advisor ofthe Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan and the JL Holdings-Burger KingPortfolio-90 Mortgage Loan.  As a result, Park Bridge Lender Services LLCis a servicing function participant in the capacities described above, becauseit is servicing mortgage loans that constituted 5% or more of the assets of theissuing entity as of its cut-off date.  The assessments of compliance withapplicable servicing criteria and accountants’ attestation reports delivered byPark Bridge Lender Services LLC in the capacities described above are listed inthe Exhibit Index.

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation acts as trustee of the Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan. Pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-CCRE18Transaction, the trustee is required to provide an assessment of compliancewith applicable servicing criteria solely with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii)of Regulation AB (regarding advances of funds or guarantees regardingcollections, cash flows or distributions, and any interest or other feescharged for such advances, are made, reviewed and approved as specified in thetransaction agreements).  However, during the reporting period, thetrustee did not perform any servicing function with respect to the servicingcriteria specified in Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB.  The masterservicer or the special servicer, to the extent required, performed theservicing function identified with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) ofRegulation AB, and each such party included Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of RegulationAB in the assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria andaccountant’s attestation report for the subject transaction.  As a result,this Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an assessment of compliancewith applicable servicing criteria of the trustee.  One or more otherservicers of the Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan have delivered one or moreassessments of compliance with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of RegulationAB.

Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation acts as trustee of the mortgage loans serviced under the Poolingand Servicing Agreement, the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan and the Oak CourtMall Mortgage Loan.  Pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, thepooling and servicing agreement for the WFRBS 2014-C20 Transaction and thepooling and servicing agreement for the WFRBS 2014-C21 Transaction, the trusteeis required to provide an assessment of compliance with applicable servicingcriteria solely with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB(regarding advances of funds or guarantees regarding collections, cash flows ordistributions, and any interest or other fees charged for such advances, aremade, reviewed and approved as specified in the transaction agreements). However, during the reporting period, the trustee did not perform anyservicing function with respect to the servicing criteria specified in Item1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB.  The master servicer or the specialservicer, to the extent required, performed the servicing function identified withrespect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, and each such party includedItem 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB in the assessment of compliance withapplicable servicing criteria and accountant’s attestation report for thesubject transaction.  As a result, this Annual Report on Form 10-K doesnot include an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria ofthe trustee.  One or more other servicers of the mortgage loans servicedunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loanand the Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan have delivered one or more assessments ofcompliance with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB.

U.S. Bank National Associationacts as trustee of the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 MortgageLoan.  Pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM2014-LC15 Transaction, the trustee is required to provide an assessment ofcompliance with applicable servicing criteria solely with respect to Item1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB (regarding advances of funds or guaranteesregarding collections, cash flows or distributions, and any interest or otherfees charged for such advances, are made, reviewed and approved as specified inthe transaction agreements).  However, during the reporting period, thetrustee did not perform any servicing function with respect to the servicingcriteria specified in Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB.  The masterservicer or the special servicer, to the extent required, performed the servicingfunction identified with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, andeach such party included Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB in theassessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria and accountant’sattestation report for the subject transaction.  As a result, this AnnualReport on Form 10-K does not include an assessment of compliance withapplicable servicing criteria of the trustee.  One or more other servicersof the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan have delivered one ormore assessments of compliance with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) ofRegulation AB.

This Annual Report on Form 10-Kincludes assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria andaccountants’ attestation reports from CoreLogic Solutions, LLC.  Thisentity was engaged by the master servicer under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement and the primary servicer of the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90Mortgage Loan, the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan and the Oak Court Mall MortgageLoan to remit tax payments received from the escrow accounts of borrowers tolocal taxing authorities, to report tax amounts due, to verify tax parcelinformation, and to verify non-escrow tax payments.  These servicingfunctions are included within the servicing criteria set forth in Items1122(d)(4)(xi) and 1122(d)(4)(xii) of Regulation AB.  Therefore, under theprinciples-based definition of “servicer” set forth in Item 1101(j) ofRegulation AB that looks to the functions that an entity performs, this vendoris a “servicer” for the purposes of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.  SeeCompliance and Disclosure Interpretations, Section 301.01 (Item 1101(j)).

This Annual Report on Form 10-Kincludes an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’attestation report and servicer compliance statement from Computershare TrustCompany, National Association (“CTCNA”).  CTCNA was engaged byWells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), in its capacityas certificate administrator and custodian, to perform certain specifiedservicing functions identified in the assessment of compliance with applicableservicing criteria and accountants’ attestation reports.  Wells Fargoengaged CTCNA in connection with the sale of Wells Fargo’s corporate trustservices business to CTCNA and its affiliates.  Further, under theprinciples-based definition of “servicer” set forth in Item 1101(j) ofRegulation AB that looks to the functions that an entity performs, this partyis a “servicer” for the purposes of Item 1123 of Regulation AB.  SeeCompliance and Disclosure Interpretations, Section 301.01 (Item 1101(j)).

Theassessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’attestation reports and servicer compliance statements of the certificateadministrator of the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan, theWoodbridge Center Mortgage Loan, the Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan andthe Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan are omitted from this Annual Report on Form10-K as the certificate administrator pursuant to the related pooling andservicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement does not perform anyactivities that address servicing criteria with respect to the issuing entityand because they are each not a “servicer” that meets the criteria in Item1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) of Regulation AB.

With respect to the pari passuloan combinations that include the Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan and the PacificDesign Center Mortgage Loan, (i) the reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria and attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria of CWCapital Asset Management LLC as special servicer of theOak Court Mall Mortgage Loan prior to December 9, 2021, Greystone ServicingCompany LLC as special servicer of the Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan on andafter December 9, 2021 and Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC (f/k/a TriMontReal Estate Advisors, Inc.) as trust advisor of the Oak Court Mall MortgageLoan, listed on the Exhibit Index are omitted from this Annual Report on Form10-K as they are not required to be included on this Annual Report on Form 10-Kper Instruction 3 to Item 1122 of Regulation AB because they are partiesperforming activities that address servicing criteria relating to 5% or less ofthe assets of the issuing entity; and (ii) the servicer compliance statementsof KeyBank National Association as primary servicer of the Pacific DesignCenter Mortgage Loan, CWCapital Asset Management LLC as special servicer of theOak Court Mall Mortgage Loan and Greystone Servicing Company LLC as specialservicer of the Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan on and after December 9, 2021,listed on the Exhibit Index are omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K asthey are not required by Item 1123 of Regulation AB to be included on thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K because they are each an unaffiliated party that isnot a “servicer” that meets the criteria in Item 1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) ofRegulation AB.

**PART I**

**Item 1.  Business.**

Omitted.

**Item 1A.  Risk Factors.**

Omitted.

**Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments.**

None.

**Item 2.  Properties.**

Omitted.

**Item 3.  Legal Proceedings.**

Omitted.

**Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures.**

Not applicable.

**PART II**

**Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity,Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.**

Omitted.

**Item 6.  Selected Financial Data.**

Omitted.

**Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis ofFinancial Condition and Results of Operations.**

Omitted.

**Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative DisclosuresAbout Market Risk.**

Omitted.

**Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.**

Omitted.

**Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements WithAccountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.**

Omitted.

**Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures.**

Omitted.

**Item 9B.  Other Information.**

None.

**PART III**

**Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and CorporateGovernance.**

Omitted.

**Item 11.  Executive Compensation.**

Omitted.

**Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain BeneficialOwners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.**

Omitted.

**Item 13.  Certain Relationships and RelatedTransactions, and Director Independence.**

Omitted.

**Item 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services.**

Omitted.

**ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS FOR REGULATION AB**

**Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant ObligorFinancial Information.**

 

The Woodbridge Center MortgageLoan (Mortgage Loan Number 1 on Annex A-1 of the prospectus supplement of theregistrant relating to the issuing entity filed on June 11, 2014 pursuant toRule 424(b)(5)) constitutes a significant obligor within the meaning of Item1101(k)(2) of Regulation AB as disclosed in the prospectus supplement.  Inaccordance with Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, the most recent unaudited netoperating income of the significant obligor was $12,167,865.31 for thetwelve-month period ended December 31, 2021.

**Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant EnhancementProvider Financial Information.**

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external credit enhancementor other support for the certificates within this transaction as describedunder Item 1114(a) of Regulation AB.

**Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain DerivativesInstruments (Financial Information).**

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides anyderivative instruments or other support for the certificates within thistransaction as described under Item 1115 of Regulation AB.

**Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.**

The registrant knows of no material pending legal proceedinginvolving the trust or any party related to the trust, other than routinelitigation incidental to the duties of those respective parties, and thefollowing, with respect to CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer,U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator and Custodian.

From time totime, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“CWCAM”),is a party to lawsuits and other legal proceedings as part of its duties as aspecial servicer (e.g., enforcement of loan obligations) and/or arising in theordinary course of business.  Other than as set forth in the followingparagraphs, there are currently no legal proceedings pending, and no legal proceedingsknown to be contemplated by governmental authorities, against CWCAM or of whichany of its property is the subject, that are material to thecertificateholders.

On December 17,2015, U.S. Bank National Association, the trustee under five pooling andservicing agreements for (i) Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C30,(ii) COBALT CMBS Commercial Trust 2007-C2, (iii) Wachovia Bank CommercialMortgage Trust 2007-C31, (iv) ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-5 and (v)ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-6 commenced a proceeding with the SecondJudicial District Court of Ramsey County, Minnesota (the “State Court”)for a declaratory judgment as to the proper allocation of certain proceeds (“DisputedProceeds”) received by CWCAM in connection with the sale of the PeterCooper Village and Stuyvesant Town property in New York, New York securingloans held by those trusts.  CWCAM was the special servicer of suchproperty.  The petition requests the State Court to instruct the trustee,the trust beneficiaries, and any other interested parties as to the amount ofthe Disputed Proceeds, if any, that constitute penalty interest and/or theamount of the Disputed Proceeds, if any, that constitute gain-on-sale proceeds,with respect to each trust.  On February 24, 2016, CWCAM made a limitedappearance with the State Court to file a motion to dismiss this proceedingbased on lack of jurisdiction, mootness, standing and forum nonconveniens.  On July 19, 2016, the State Court denied CWCAM’s motion todismiss.  On July 22, 2016, the action was removed to federal court inMinnesota (“Federal Court”).  On October 21, 2016, the FederalCourt held a hearing on the motion to transfer the action to the United StatesDistrict Court for the Southern District of New York (“SDNY Court”), amotion to remand to state court and a motion to hear CWCAM’s request forreconsideration of the motion to dismiss.  On March 14, 2017, the FederalCourt reserved the determination on the motion to hear CWCAM’s request forreconsideration of the motion to dismiss, denied the motion to remand thematter to state court and granted the motion to transfer the proceeding to theSDNY Court.  Cross motions for judgment on the pleadings were filed butthe SDNY Court was unable to decide the case based on the pleadings and theSDNY Court ordered discovery.  All fact discovery was completed inDecember, 2018 and expert discovery was completed on March 15, 2019.  Theparties submitted cross motions for summary judgment, and on March 19, 2020,the SDNY Court entered an opinion and order in which it granted summaryjudgment in CWCAM’s favor and held that CWCAM was entitled to the entire amountof penalty interest and that CWCAM’s determination of Yield Maintenance wascorrect.  In the 127-page opinion, the SDNY Court found for CWCAM on everyissue presented by the trustee’s petition, namely, that the funds in disputeconstitute penalty interest and yield maintenance, not gain-on-sale proceeds,and that the amount of penalty interest and yield maintenance was correctlycalculated.  An appeal of the SDNY Court’s decision was taken on April 29,2020.  Oral argument on the appeal occurred on June 21, 2021. The partiesawait the decision of the appeals court.  

On December 1,2017, a complaint against CWCAM and others was filed in the United StatesDistrict Court for the Southern District of New York styled as CWCapitalCobalt Vr Ltd. v. CWCapital Investments LLC, No. 17-cv-9463 (the “OriginalComplaint”).  The gravamen of the Original Complaint alleged breachesof a contract and fiduciary duties by CWCAM’s affiliate, CWCapital InvestmentsLLC, in its capacity as collateral manager for the collateralized debtobligation transaction involving CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. In total, there arefourteen counts pled in the Original Complaint.  Of those fourteen, fiveclaims were asserted against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciaryduty, conversion and unjust enrichment.  On May 23, 2018, the OriginalComplaint was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.  On June28, 2018, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. filed a substantially similar complaint inthe Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York styled as CWCapitalCobalt Vr Ltd. v. CWCapital Investments LLC, Index No. 653277/2018 (the “NewComplaint”).  The gravamen of the New Complaint is the same as theprevious complaint filed in the United State District Court for the SouthernDistrict of New York.  In total, there are sixteen counts pled in the NewComplaint.  Of those sixteen counts, five claims were asserted againstCWCAM for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, conversion and unjustenrichment, one count seeks a declaratory judgment that the plaintiff has theright to enforce the contracts in question and one count seeks an injunctionrequiring the defendants to recognize the plaintiff as the directing holder forthe trusts in question.  On January 11, 2019, the plaintiff dismissed withprejudice the declaratory judgment and injunction counts.  The NewComplaint and related summons were not served on the defendants until July 13,2018 and July 16, 2018.  The plaintiff’s motion for a preliminaryinjunction was denied by the court on July 31, 2018.  On August 3, 2018,the defendants, including CWCAM, filed a motion to dismiss the New Complaint inits entirety.  On August 20, 2019, the court entered an order grantingdefendants’ motion almost in its entirety, dismissing eleven of the sixteencounts and partially dismissing two additional counts.  Of the remainingcounts, two are asserted against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breach offiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.  On September 19, 2019, CWCapitalCobalt Vr Ltd. filed a notice of appeal relating to the August 20, 2019dismissal order and on September 26, 2019, filed an amended complaint againstCWCI and CWCAM attempting to address deficiencies relating to certain of theclaims dismissed by the August 20, 2019 order.  CWCI and CWCAM filed theirMotion to Dismiss the amended complaint on October 28, 2019.  The courtheard argument on the Motion to Dismiss the amended complaint on January 22,2020 and on October 23, 2020, the court granted the motion dismissing theamended claims.  On November 30, 2020, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. filed anotice of appeal relating to the October 23, 2020 dismissal order.  OnApril 27, 2021, the First Department affirmed the dismissal as to claimsagainst CWCAM that were part of the August 20, 2019 dismissal, but reversed thedismissal of two counts for breach of the Collateral Management Agreement againstCWCI.  CWCI has sought leave to file an appeal of the decision.  Bothrequests for leave were denied by the First Department.  The plaintiff hasalso sought leave to appeal the dismissal of the claims against CWCAM. CWCAM believes that it has performed its obligations under the related poolingand servicing agreements in good faith and the remaining allegations in the NewComplaint are without merit.  

On January 24,2016 PSW NYC LLC commenced a complaint (the “PSW Complaint”) with theSupreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “PSW Court”)against Bank of America, N.A. as trustee under the pooling and servicingagreements for Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C30 and COBALT CMBSCommercial Trust 2007-C2, U.S. Bank National Association as trustee under thepooling and servicing agreements for Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust2007-C31, ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-5 and ML-CFC CommercialMortgage Trust 2007-6 (collectively, the “PSW Trusts”), PCV-M HoldingsLLC and CWCapital Asset Management LLC, individually and as special servicerfor the PSW Trusts (collectively, the “Defendants”), seeking either (a)damages in an amount to be determined by the PSW Court but alleged by theplaintiffs to be approximately $500,000,000, such amount being the amount PSWNYC LLC alleges would have been recovered on certain mezzanine loans (the “PCVSTMezzanine Loans”) related to the Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Townproperty (the “PCVST Property”) in New York City which PSW NYC LLC soldto an entity related to the Defendants pursuant to a settlement agreementrelated to certain prior litigation (the “2010 Settlement Agreement”) or(b) the rescission of the 2010 Settlement Agreement which would result in,among other things, the rescission of the sale of the PCVST Mezzanine Loans anda claim for certain proceeds from the sale of the PCVST Property.  PSW NYCLLC alleges that the Defendants procured the 2010 Settlement Agreement by fraudand further that the terms of the 2010 Settlement Agreement were breached bythe Defendants.  On February 26, 2016, CWCAM on behalf of itself and theother Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the PSW Complaint (the “CWCAMMotion to Dismiss”).  On April 11, 2016, PSW NYC LLC opposed the CWCAMMotion to Dismiss and cross-moved for a partial summary judgment on liabilityregarding allegations of breach of the 2010 Settlement Agreement (the “PSWCross-Motion”).  On May 5, 2016, the Defendants subsequently filedtheir reply and opposition to the PSW Cross-Motion.  On August 23, 2016,oral arguments were provided to the PSW Court regarding the PSW Complaint, theCWCAM Motion to Dismiss and the PSW Cross-Motion and the PSW Court took sucharguments under advisement.  On October 31, 2016, the PSW Court issued anorder granting the CWCAM Motion to Dismiss, denying the PSW Cross-Motion anddismissing the PSW Complaint with prejudice.  Subsequently, PSW NYC LLCfiled a notice of appeal relating to such order.  On February 21, 2017,PSW NYC LLC filed its appeal and supporting brief arguing that the PSW Courterred by finding no breach of the assignment agreement and no fraudulentinducement.  Oral argument was heard on May 4, 2017 at which point thecourt took the arguments under advisement.  On May 25, 2017, the New YorkFirst Department appellate court affirmed the dismissal of all PSW claims anddenied a request for leave to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals onSeptember 12, 2017.  

On March 31, 2016, RAIT Preferred Funding II, Ltd. (“RAITPreferred Funding”) commenced a complaint (“RAIT Complaint”) withthe Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “RAITCourt”), claiming it owns $18,500,000 of a mortgage loan secured by thedevelopment of the One Congress Street Property in Boston, Massachusetts (the “Loan”)and seeking (a) a declaratory judgment stating that RAIT Preferred Funding isthe directing lender under a co-lender agreement dated March 28, 2007 and apooling and servicing agreement dated March 1, 2007 (collectively, the “OperativeAgreements”) and was the directing lender at the time of the impropermodification of the Loan, (b) a declaratory judgment stating that RAITPreferred Funding has the right to terminate the special servicer, (c) monetarydamages for the value of the bonds and fees paid to CWCAM as the specialservicer of the Loan and (d) other things.  On May 17, 2016, CWCAM filed amotion to dismiss the RAIT Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”) stating thatthe RAIT Complaint did not state a claim and the essential facts of the RAITComplaint are negated by affidavits and evidentiary materials submitted withthe RAIT Complaint.  On June 14, 2016, RAIT Preferred Funding filed aMemorandum of Law in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (“Opposition”)stating that the claims in the RAIT Complaint were properly stated.  OnJune 30, 2016, CWCAM filed a reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss and inresponse to the Opposition, stating that each of CWCAM’s arguments is supportedby the express language of the agreements between the parties, the documentaryevidence and New York case law.  On September 30, 2016, RAIT PreferredFunding and CWCAM entered into a confidential Settlement Agreement (the “2016Settlement”), which provides for a stay of the RAIT Preferred Funding litigation(the “Litigation Stay”) through August 25, 2017.  Pursuant to theterms of the 2016 Settlement, upon satisfaction of a term of the 2016Settlement by August 25, 2017 (or such later date agreed to by the parties),the RAIT Preferred Funding litigation will be dismissed with prejudice. On May 19, 2017 the Borrower repaid the Loan in accordance with the terms ofthe notes and satisfied the condition to dismissal with prejudice.  RAIThas refused to dismiss the case and is claiming that the B Note should be paidin full.  CWCAM believes that it has performed its obligations under theOperative Agreements in good faith, and that the action should be dismissedwith prejudice.  On August 29, 2017, the RAIT Court granted leave to RAITPreferred Funding to amend its complaint.  On September 20, 2017, RAITPreferred Funding filed an Amended Complaint (the “RAIT Amended Complaint”),which omits its original claims, adds Wells Fargo Bank as a defendant, andseeks (a) specific performance requiring repayment of the $18,500,000 principalamount of the B Note or, in the alternative, monetary damages, including the$18,500,000 principal amount of the B Note, in an amount to be determined attrial, (b) monetary damages on any fees paid to CWCAM as special servicer orWells Fargo Bank as master servicer in connection with the borrower’s repaymentof the Loan, (c) a declaratory judgment that RAIT Preferred Funding is entitledto recover the full $18,500,000 principal amount of the B Note, (d) punitivedamages against CWCAM, and (e) other things.  On October 11, 2017, CWCAMfiled a motion to dismiss the RAIT Amended Complaint (“CWCAM Motion toDismiss Amended Complaint”) stating that the RAIT Amended Complaint did notstate a claim and the essential facts of the RAIT Amended Complaint are negatedby the Operative Agreements and other admissible evidentiary materials. On November 13, 2017, Wells Fargo Bank filed a motion to dismiss the RAITAmended Complaint (the “Wells Fargo Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint”)and joined the CWCAM Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint.  On January 29,2018, the court dismissed all claims but for breach of contract and discoverycommenced.  CWCAM filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on March 18,2019.   This matter was settled and the case dismissed on May 15,2019.

U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) and otherlarge financial institutions have been sued in their capacity as trustee orsuccessor trustee for certain residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”)trusts.  The complaints, primarily filed by investors or investor groupsagainst U.S. Bank and similar institutions, allege the trustees caused lossesto investors as a result of alleged failures by the sponsors, mortgage loansellers and servicers to comply with the governing agreements for these RMBStrusts.  Plaintiffs generally assert causes of action based upon thetrustees’ purported failures to enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loansellers for alleged breaches of representations and warranties, notify securityholdersof purported events of default allegedly caused by breaches of servicingstandards by mortgage loan servicers and abide by a heightened standard of carefollowing alleged events of default.  

 

U.S. Bank denies liability and believes that it has performedits obligations under the RMBS trusts in good faith, that its actions were notthe cause of losses to investors, that it has meritorious defenses, and it hascontested and intends to continue contesting the plaintiffs’ claimsvigorously.  However, U.S. Bank cannot assure you as to the outcome of anyof the litigation, or the possible impact of these litigations on the trusteeor the RMBS trusts.  

 

On March 9, 2018, a law firm purporting to represent fifteenDelaware statutory trusts (the “DSTs”) that issued securities backed bystudent loans (the “Student Loans”) filed a lawsuit in the DelawareCourt of Chancery against U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”)in its capacities as indenture trustee and successor special servicer, andthree other institutions in their respective transaction capacities, withrespect to the DSTs and the Student Loans.  This lawsuit is captioned NationalCollegiate Student Loan Master Trust I v. U.S. Bank National Ass’n, C.A.No. 2018-0167-JRS (Del. Ch.) (the “NCMSLT Action”).  The complaint,as amended on June 15, 2018, alleged that the DSTs have been harmed as a resultof purported misconduct or omissions by the defendants concerningadministration of the trusts and special servicing of the Student Loans. Since the filing of the NCMSLT Action, certain Student Loan borrowers have madeassertions against U.S. Bank concerning special servicing that appear to bebased on certain allegations made on behalf of the DSTs in the NCMSLT Action.

 

U.S. Bank has filed a motion seeking dismissal of theoperative complaint in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Chancery CourtRules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, a stay of the case whileother prior filed disputes involving the DSTs and the Student Loans are litigated. On November 7, 2018, the Court ruled that the case should be stayed in itsentirety pending resolution of the first-filed cases.  On January 21,2020, the Court entered an order consolidating for pretrial purposes the NCMSLTAction and three other lawsuits pending in the Delaware Court of Chanceryconcerning the DSTs and the Student Loans, which remains pending.  

U.S. Bank denies liability in the NCMSLT Action and believesit has performed its obligations as indenture trustee and special servicer ingood faith and in compliance in all material respects with the terms of theagreements governing the DSTs and that it has meritorious defenses.  Ithas contested and intends to continue contesting the plaintiffs’ claimsvigorously.

In December 2014, Phoenix Light SF Limited and certainrelated entities and the National Credit Union Administration (“NCUA”)filed complaints in the United States District Court for the Southern Districtof New York against Wells Fargo Bank, alleging claims against Wells Fargo Bankin its capacity as trustee for a number of residential mortgage-backedsecurities trusts.  Complaints raising similar allegations have been filedby Commerzbank AG in the Southern District of New York and by IKB Internationaland IKB Deutsche Industriebank in New York state court.  In each case, theplaintiffs allege that Wells Fargo Bank, as trustee, caused losses toinvestors, and plaintiffs assert causes of action based upon, among otherthings, the trustee’s alleged failure to notify and enforce repurchaseobligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representationsand warranties, notify investors of alleged events of default, and abide byappropriate standards of care following alleged events of default.  WellsFargo Bank previously settled two class action lawsuits with similarallegations that were filed in November 2014 and December 2016 by institutionalinvestors in the Southern District of New York and New York state court,respectively.  In addition, Park Royal I LLC and Park Royal II LLC havefiled complaints in New York state court alleging Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., astrustee, failed to take appropriate actions upon learning of defective mortgageloan documentation.  In March 2021, the Company entered into an agreementto resolve the case filed by the NCUA.

 

In addition to the foregoingcases, in August 2014 and August 2015 Nomura Credit & Capital Inc. (“Nomura”)and Natixis Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“Natixis”) filed a total of seventhird-party complaints against Wells Fargo Bank in New York state court. In the underlying first-party actions, Nomura and Natixis have been suedfor alleged breaches of representations and warranties made in connection withresidential mortgage-backed securities sponsored by them.  In thethird-party actions, Nomura and Natixis allege that Wells Fargo Bank, as masterservicer, primary servicer or securities administrator, failed to notify Nomuraand Natixis of their own breaches, failed to properly oversee the primaryservicers, and failed to adhere to accepted servicing practices.  Natixisadditionally alleges that Wells Fargo Bank failed to perform default oversightduties.  Wells Fargo Bank has asserted counterclaims alleging that Nomuraand Natixis failed to provide Wells Fargo Bank notice of their representationand warranty breaches.

With respect to each of the foregoing litigations, WellsFargo Bank believes plaintiffs’ claims are without merit and intends to contestthe claims vigorously, but there can be no assurances as to the outcome of thelitigations or the possible impact of the litigations on Wells Fargo Bank orthe related RMBS trusts.

**Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and CertainRelationships and Related Transactions.**

The information regarding this Item has been previouslyprovided in a prospectus supplement of the Registrant relating to the issuingentity filed on June 11, 2014 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5).

**Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with ApplicableServicing Criteria.**

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on suchassessments of compliance with respect to the mortgage loans are attachedhereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as ScheduleIII to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement incorporated by reference as Exhibit4.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entitiesparticipating in a servicing function for the transaction responsible for eachapplicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on suchassessments of compliance with respect to the JL Holdings-Burger KingPortfolio-90 Mortgage Loan, which is being serviced and administered pursuantto the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-LC15 Transaction, areattached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached asSchedule II to the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-LC15Transaction incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 to this Annual Report onForm 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing functionfor the COMM 2014-LC15 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicingcriteria set forth in Item 1122(d).

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on suchassessments of compliance with respect to the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan,which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicingagreement for the WFRBS 2014-C20 Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Schedule III to the pooling andservicing agreement for the WFRBS 2014-C20 Transaction incorporated byreference as Exhibit 4.3 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chartidentifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the WFRBS2014-C20 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria setforth in Item 1122(d).

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on suchassessments of compliance with respect to the Pacific Design Center MortgageLoan, which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling andservicing agreement for the COMM 2014-CCRE18 Transaction, are attached heretounder Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Schedule II tothe pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2014-CCRE18 Transactionincorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.4 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K isa chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for theCOMM 2014-CCRE18 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteriaset forth in Item 1122(d).

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on suchassessments of compliance with respect to the Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan,which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicingagreement for the WFRBS 2014-C21 Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Schedule III to the pooling andservicing agreement for the WFRBS 2014-C21 Transaction incorporated byreference as Exhibit 4.5 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chartidentifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the WFRBS2014-C21 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria setforth in Item 1122(d).

**Item 1123 of Regulation AB, Servicer Compliance Statement.**

The servicer compliance statements are attached as Exhibitsto this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

**PART IV**

**Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules**

(a) The following is a list of documents filed as part ofthis Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(1) Not applicable

(2) Not applicable

(3) See below

 

4.1          Poolingand Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2014, by and among Wells FargoCommercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, SitusHoldings, LLC, as Trust Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, andWilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to theregistrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on June 26, 2014 underCommission File No. 333-172366-14 and incorporated by reference herein).

4.2          Poolingand Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2014, by and among DeutscheMortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian,and Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor (filed as Exhibit 99.7 to the registrant’sCurrent Report on Form 8-K filed on June 11, 2014 under Commission File No.333-172366-14 and incorporated by reference herein).

4.3          Poolingand Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2014, by and among Wells FargoCommercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as General Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asGeneral Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as Co-opSpecial Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administratorand as Custodian, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (filedas Exhibit 99.6 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June11, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-172366-14 and incorporated by referenceherein).

4.4          Poolingand Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2014, by and among DeutscheMortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, KeyBank NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Situs Holdings, LLC, asOperating Advisor (filed as Exhibit 99.8 to the registrant’s Current Report onForm 8-K/A filed on July 3, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-172366-14 andincorporated by reference herein).

4.5          Poolingand Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2014, by and among RBSCommercial Funding Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,as General Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as General SpecialServicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as Co-op SpecialServicer, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administratorand as Custodian, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (filedas Exhibit 99.9 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed onDecember 16, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-172366-14 and incorporated byreference herein).

 

31           Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

33           Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities.

33.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer

33.2        LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer

33.3        Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (Omitted.  SeeExplanatory Notes.)

33.4        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator

33.5        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian

33.6        Situs Holdings, LLC, as Trust Advisor

33.7        CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant

33.8        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator on andafter November 1, 2021

33.9        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021

33.10      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Montgomery Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)

33.11      LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of theMontgomery Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.2)

33.12      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Montgomery MallMortgage Loan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

33.13      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the Montgomery Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.5)

33.14      Situs Holdings, LLC, as Trust Advisor of theMontgomery Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.6)

33.15      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Montgomery Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.7)

33.16      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 33.9)

33.17      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit33.1)

33.18      Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicerof the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan

33.19      U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee of the JL Holdings-Burger KingPortfolio-90 Mortgage Loan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

33.20      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan (seeExhibit 33.5)

33.21      Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor of the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan

33.22      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan (seeExhibit 33.7)

33.23      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 33.9)

33.24      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)

33.25      Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicerof the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.18)

33.26      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Woodbridge CenterMortgage Loan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

33.27      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.5)

33.28      Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor ofthe Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan

33.29      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.7)

33.30      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 33.9)

33.31      KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicerof the Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan

33.32      Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer ofthe Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.18)

33.33      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee of the Pacific Design CenterMortgage Loan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

33.34      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.5)

33.35      Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor of the Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.21)

33.36      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 33.9)

33.37      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)

33.38      CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer of the Oak Court MallMortgage Loan prior to December 9, 2021 (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

33.39      Greystone Servicing Company LLC, as Special Servicer of the Oak Court MallMortgage Loan on and after December 9, 2021 (Omitted.  See ExplanatoryNotes.)

33.40      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Oak Court MallMortgage Loan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

33.41      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.5)

33.42      Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC (f/k/a TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.),as Trust Advisor of the Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan (Omitted.  SeeExplanatory Notes.)

33.43      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.7)

33.44      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 33.9)

34           Attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities.

34.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer

34.2        LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer

34.3        Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (Omitted.  SeeExplanatory Notes.)

34.4        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator

34.5        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian

34.6        Situs Holdings, LLC, as Trust Advisor

34.7        CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant

34.8        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator on andafter November 1, 2021

34.9        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021

34.10      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Montgomery Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)

34.11      LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of theMontgomery Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.2)

34.12      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Montgomery MallMortgage Loan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

34.13      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the Montgomery Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.5)

34.14      Situs Holdings, LLC, as Trust Advisor of theMontgomery Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.6)

34.15      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Montgomery Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.7)

34.16      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 34.9)

34.17      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit34.1)

34.18      Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicerof the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan

34.19      U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee of the JL Holdings-Burger KingPortfolio-90 Mortgage Loan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

34.20      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan (seeExhibit 34.5)

34.21      Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor of the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan

34.22      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan (seeExhibit 34.7)

34.23      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 34.9)

34.24      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)

34.25      Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicerof the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.18)

34.26      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Woodbridge CenterMortgage Loan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

34.27      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.5)

34.28      Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor ofthe Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan

34.29      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.7)

34.30      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 34.9)

34.31      KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicerof the Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan

34.32      Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicerof the Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.18)

34.33      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee of the Pacific Design CenterMortgage Loan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

34.34      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.5)

34.35      Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor of the Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.21)

34.36      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 34.9)

34.37      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)

34.38      CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer of the Oak Court Mall MortgageLoan prior to December 9, 2021 (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

34.39      Greystone Servicing Company LLC, as Special Servicer of the Oak Court MallMortgage Loan on and after December 9, 2021 (Omitted.  See ExplanatoryNotes.)

34.40      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Oak Court MallMortgage Loan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

34.41      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.5)

34.42      Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC (f/k/a TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.),as Trust Advisor of the Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan (Omitted.  SeeExplanatory Notes.)

34.43      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.7)

34.44      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 34.9)

35           Servicer compliance statements.

35.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer

35.2        LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer

35.3        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator

35.4        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator on andafter November 1, 2021

35.5        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Montgomery Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)

35.6        LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of theMontgomery Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.2)

35.7        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit35.1)

35.8        Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicerof the JL Holdings-Burger King Portfolio-90 Mortgage Loan

35.9        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)

35.10      Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicerof the Woodbridge Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.8)

35.11      KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Pacific Design CenterMortgage Loan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

35.12      Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicerof the Pacific Design Center Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.8)

35.13      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Oak Court Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)

35.14      CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer of the Oak Court MallMortgage Loan prior to December 9, 2021 (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

35.15      Greystone Servicing Company LLC, as Special Servicer of the Oak Court MallMortgage Loan on and after December 9, 2021 (Omitted.  See ExplanatoryNotes.)

99.1        MortgageLoan Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2014, between Wells FargoCommercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association(filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filedon June 26, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-172366-14 and incorporated byreference herein)

99.2        MortgageLoan Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2014, among Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc., Ladder Capital Finance LLC and Ladder CapitalFinance Holdings LLLP (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant’s Current Reporton Form 8-K/A filed on June 26, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-172366-14and incorporated by reference herein)

99.3        MortgageLoan Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2014, between Wells FargoCommercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc (filedas Exhibit 99.3 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on June26, 2014 under Commission File No. 333-172366-14 and incorporated by referenceherein)

99.4        MortgageLoan Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2014, between Wells FargoCommercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. and RBS Financial Products Inc. (filed asExhibit 99.4 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on June 26,2014 under Commission File No. 333-172366-14 and incorporated by referenceherein)

99.5        MortgageLoan Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2014, between Wells FargoCommercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. and Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC (filed asExhibit 99.5 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on June 26,2014 under Commission File No. 333-172366-14 and incorporated by reference herein)

(b            The exhibits required to be filed by the Registrant pursuant to Item 601 ofRegulation S-K are listed above.

(c)           Not Applicable.

 

**SIGNATURES**

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report tobe signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Wells Fargo Commercial MortgageSecurities, Inc.(Depositor)

/s/ AnthonySfarra

AnthonySfarra, President

(senior officer in charge ofsecuritization of the depositor)

Date: March 14, 2022