alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CEO AND CFO CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Pehong Chen, the Chief Executive Officer ofBroadVision, Inc. (the “Company”), and William E. Meyer, the Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

1.             The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2003, to which this Certification is attached asExhibit 99.1 (the “ Periodic**Report**“), fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, and

 

2.             The information contained in the Periodic Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

In WitnessWhereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 14th day of May,2003. 

 
| /s/    PEHONG CHEN |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Pehong Chen                  |
| *Chief Executive Officer*    |

 
| /s/    WILLIAM E. MEYER |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|
| William E.  Meyer                 |
| *Chief Financial Officer*         |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided toBroadVision, Inc. and will be retained by BroadVision, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

This certification“accompanies” the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whethermade before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      25,532,940
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      361
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,696,980
<PP&E>                                       7,645,084
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,389,977
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,439,211
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,558,793
<BONDS>                                      3,296,382
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        93,227
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,490,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,439,211
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,274,589
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             463,149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,520,627)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,520,627)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,520,627)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.81)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 190 (Friday, October 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 60721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24637]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Aerospace Supplier Development Mission to China; Recruitment 
Reopened for Additional Applications

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Timeframe for Recruitment and Applications

    Mission recruitment will be conducted in an open and public manner, 
including publication in the Federal Register, posting on the Commerce 
Department trade mission calendar (http://www.ita.doc.gov/doctm/tmcal.html) and other Internet web sites, press releases to general and 
trade media, direct mail, notices by industry trade associations and 
other multiplier groups, and publicity at industry meetings, symposia, 
conferences, and trade shows.
    The recruitment has reopened and the deadline for additional 
applications is extended to September 29, 2010. The U.S. Department of 
Commerce will review all additional applications after the deadline. We 
will inform applicants of selection decisions as soon as possible after 
the deadline. Applications received after the deadline will be 
considered only if space and scheduling constraints permit.
    Companies who have already applied do not need to reapply.

Contacts

U.S. Commercial Service Domestic Contact

    Lisa Huot, 202-482-2796, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c70554f5d12744953487c484e5d5859125b534a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8f4d1cbd996f0cdd7ccf8cccad9dcdd96dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>.

Lisa Huot,
Trade Promotion Programs, International Trade Specialist, U.S. 
Commercial Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-24637 Filed 9-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Fredrick L. EVANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D09-5354.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 1, 2010.

Luke Newman of Luke Newman, P.A., Special Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, DAVIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., Concur.
#### In re Dreola M. GUYTON.

No. 2010-OB-2416.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 22, 2010.

*276ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) has filed formal charges against respondent alleging that she committed serious attorney misconduct, the most significant of which involves commingling and conversion of client funds and failing to maintain a client trust account. Respondent now seeks to permanently resign from the practice of law in lieu of discipline. The ODC has concurred in respondent’s petition.

Having considered the Petition for Permanent Resignation from the Practice of Law filed by Dreola M. Guyton, Louisiana Bar Roll number 17628, and the concurrence thereto filed by the ODC,

IT IS ORDERED that the request of Dreola M. Guyton for permanent resignation in lieu of discipline be and is hereby granted, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.1 and Rule 5.5 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Dreola M. Guyton shall be permanently prohibited from practicing law in Louisiana or in any other jurisdiction in which she is admitted to the practice of law; shall be permanently prohibited from seeking readmission to the practice of law in this state or in any other jurisdiction in which she is admitted; and shall be permanently prohibited from seeking admission to the practice of law in any jurisdiction.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Jeannette T. Knoll Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana
Exhibit
10.8





 


ARISZ
ACQUISITION CORP.


199
Water St, 31st Floor


New
York, NY 10038


 


November
17, 2021


 


Arisz
Investment LLC

199 Water St, 31st Floor

New York, NY 10038


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration
statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of the securities of Arisz Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation
by the Company of an initial business combination (a “Business Combination”) or (ii) the Company’s liquidation
(in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination
Date”), Arisz Investment LLC (“Sponsor”) shall make available to the Company certain office space,
utilities, and secretarial, administrative and consulting services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 199
Water St, 31st Floor, New York, NY 10038 (or any successor location). In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay Sponsor a sum equal
to $10,000 per month, commencing on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. Sponsor hereby agrees
that payment of such amounts shall be deferred, without interest, until the date of consummation by the Company of the initial Business
Combination. Sponsor hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may
be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established by the Company for the benefit
of the Company’s public stockholders upon the consummation of the IPO as described in the Registration Statement (“Claim”)
and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with
the Company in connection with this letter agreement and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


Very
truly yours,


 


	ARISZ
    ACQUISITION CORP.	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Echo Hindle-Yang	 
	Name:	Echo Hindle-Yang	 
	Title:	Chief Executive
    Officer	 
	 	 
	AGREED
    TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 
	ARISZ
    INVESTMENT LLC	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Echo Hindle-Yang	 
	Name:	Echo Hindle-Yang	 
	Title:	Managing Member
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-10-141-CV

WENDY JO ARCHER	APPELLANT

	V.

CHRISTOPHER JOHN ARCHER	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM THE 325TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Wendy Jo Archer attempts to appeal from denial of her motion to recuse the trial judge in cause number 325-371563-04.  Judge Jeff Walker heard appellant’s motion and denied it on April 16, 2010.  Appellant filed a notice of appeal, and on May 12, 2010, we notified the parties of our concern that this court lacked jurisdiction over this appeal because the “Order Denying Motion to Recuse” does not appear to be a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order.  We also stated that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court, on or before May 24, 2010, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  No response has been filed.  

	Generally, an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment or order. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001).  An order denying a motion to recuse is an unappealable interlocutory order.  Hawkins v. Walker, 233 S.W.3d 380, 401 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, pet. denied). Specifically, rule 18a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure provides that an order denying a motion to recuse may be reviewed only “on appeal from the final judgment.”  Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a(f); see Hawkins, 233 S.W.3d at 401. Because the order from which appellant attempts to appeal is an unappealable interlocutory order, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  July 1, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         April 22, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Library of Medicine, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Zoe E. Huang, MD, Scientific Review Officer, Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, NIH, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, (301) 594-4937,                         *huangz@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 29, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-2431 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### William CRUZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D09-1139.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 20, 2011.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Maria E. Lauredo, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Forrest L. Andrews, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA and SALTER, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

William Cruz appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted second degree murder. We reverse the conviction on each of two independently-sufficient grounds. First, the attempted voluntary manslaughter instruction, as given to the jury, violates the holding in *State v. Montgomery,*39 So.3d 252 (Fla.2010).

Second, we find that Cruz’s second demand to represent himself was unequivocally made, necessitating a Faretta1 hearing. *Rodriguez v. State,*982 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Because such a hearing was not conducted before the trial court denied Cruz’s demand, a reversal on this ground is also required.

Reversed and remanded.

1

. *Faretta v. California,*422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975).
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Brett COX.

No. 2010-KK-2280.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 25, 2010.

In re Cox, Brett; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 495-253; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-1251.

Stay denied. Writ denied.
EXHIBIT
21.1

LIST OF
SUBSIDIARIES

Amboy Bus Co.,
Inc.

Atlantic-Chittenango Real Property
Corp.

Atlantic-Conn. Transit, Inc.

Atlantic
Escorts Inc.

Atlantic Express Coachways,
Inc.

Atlantic Express of L.A. Inc.

Atlantic
Express of Missouri Inc.

Atlantic Express of New Jersey,
Inc.

Atlantic Express of Pennsylvania,
Inc.

Atlantic-Hudson, Inc.

Atlantic North
Casualty Company

Atlantic Paratrans,
Inc.

Atlantic Paratrans of NYC, Inc.

Atlantic
Paratrans of Pennsylvania, Inc.

Atlantic Queens Bus
Corp.

Block 7932, Inc.

Brookfield Transit
Inc.

Central New York Reorganization
Corp.

Courtesy Bus Co., Inc.

GVD Leasing Co.,
Inc.

180 Jamaica Corp.

Jersey Bus Sales,
Inc.

Jersey Business Land Co., Inc.

Merit
Transportation Corp.

Metro Affiliates,
Inc.

Metropolitan Escort Service, Inc.

Midway
Leasing Inc.

Staten Island Bus,
Inc.

Temporary Transit Service, Inc.

201 West
Sotello Realty, Inc.

Wrightholm Bus Line,
Inc.

Atlantic Transit, Corp.

Airport
Services, Inc.

Atlantic Express New England,
Inc.

Atlantic Express of California,
Inc.

Atlantic Express of Illinois,
Inc.

Atlantic Express of South Carolina,
Inc.

Atlantic Express of Upstate New York,
Inc.

Atlantic Paratrans of Arizona,
Inc.

Fiore Bus Service, Inc.

Groom
Transportation, Inc.

James McCarty Limo Service,
Inc.

K. Corr, Inc.

McIntire Transportation,
Inc.

Mountain-Atlantic, Inc.

R. Fiore Bus
Service, Inc.

Raybern Bus Service,
Inc.

Raybern Capital Corp.

Raybern Equity
Corp.

Robert L. McCarthy & Son,
Inc.

Transcomm, Inc.

Winsale.
Inc.

---
#### James Edward DANIELS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D11-1422.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 13, 2011.

*1282James Edward Daniels, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, C.J., and ROTHENBERG and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the postconviction record, *see*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the postconviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A0 77 9 . MATTHEW DONALD SHI ELDS v . THE STATE.

M at t h ew Do n al d Sh i el ds p l ed g u i l t y t o en ti ci n g a ch i l d fo r i n d en t p u rp o s es an d

i n ces t

. Fo l l o wi n g th e rev o cat i o n o f h i s p ro b at i o n i n Sep tem ber 2 01 6

, Sh i el d s fi l ed a

m o ti o n t o m o di fy h is p ro b at ed s en t en ce. Th e t ri al co u rt d e n i ed t he m o t i o n , an d

Sh i el d s fi l ed a m ot i o n fo r reco n s id e r a t i o n

. Th e t ri al co u rt d en i ed t h e m o t i o n fo r

reco n s i d erat i on , an d Sh iel d s fi l ed t h i s d irect ap p eal

. 1 W e l ack ju ri s d i ct io n

.

“ In det erm in i n g t h e p ro p er p ro ced u re t o fo ll o w i n pu rs u i n g an a p p e a l

, t h e

u n d erl y i n g s u b

ject m at t er gen eral l y co n t ro l s o v er th e rel i ef s ou g h t .” S el f v. Ba yn eu m , 2 6 5 Ga. 1 4

, 1 4 -1 5 (4 5 3 SE2 d 27 ) (1 9 9 5 ). Becau s e t h e u n d erl y in g s u bje c t m at t er o f

t h i s ap p eal i s th e rev o cat i o n of Sh i el d s ’ s p ro bat i on , co m p li an ce wi t h th e d i s cret i o n ary

ap p li cat io n p ro ced u res is req u ired

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (5 ), (b ); To d d v. S t a t e , 2 3 6 Ga. Ap p

. 7 5 7

, 7 5 8 (5 1 3 SE2 d 2 8 7 ) (1 9 9 9 ); W h i t e v. S t a t e , 2 3 3 Ga. Ap p

. 8 7 3

, 8 7 4
(5 0 5 SE2 d 2 2 8 ) (1 9 9 8 ).

Fu rt herm o re, an o rd er d en y i n g a m o t i o n fo r reco n s id erat i o n i s n ot ap p eal ab l e

i n it s o wn ri g h t. S

a va ge v. News o me , 1 7 3 Ga. A p p

. 2 7 1 (3 2 6 SE2 d 5 ) (1 98 5 ); s ee al s o

Bel l v. Co h r a n , 2 4 4 Ga. Ap p

. 51 0

, 5 1 1 (5 3 6 SE2 d 1 8 7 ) (2 0 0 0 ). No r di d t h e m o t i o n

fo r reco n s i d erat i o n ex t en d t he t im e fo r fi l in g a ch al l en g e t o th e 2 01 6 rev o cat i o n o rd er.

See Bel l v. Co h r a n , s up ra.

1 Sh iel d s ap p eal ed t o t h e Su p rem e Co u rt

, wh i ch tran sferred t h e cas e t o t h i s Co u rt . See Cas e No . S2 0 A 0 1 7 2, t ran s ferred Sep t . 2 5 , 2 0 1 9

. January 09, 2020Fo r t h es e reas o n s , we l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n t o co n s id er t hi s ap p eal

, wh i ch i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 01/09/2020
#### Portia J. SIMMONS, Appellant, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, Wendy’s International, Inc., and Wendy’s Old Fashioned Hamburger, Appellees.

No. 3D10-315.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 22, 2010.

Portia Simmons, in proper person.

Louis A. Guttierrez, Senior Attorney, Tallahassee, for appellee, Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission.

Before WELLS and SUAREZ, JJ„ and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

WELLS, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission dismissing the appeal of Portia J. Simmons as untimely filed. The Commission dismissed Simmons’ appeal after according her an opportunity to show cause why her appeal was filed thirty-five days late. On the record before us, we find no error in the determination that the appeal was untimely and affirm. *See*§ 443.151(4)(b)5, Fla. Stat. (2010) (providing twenty days in which to appeal from a referee’s determination); 60BB-7.006 Fla. Admin. Code R. (providing “[a]n application for review which is not filed within the time allowed by law shall be dismissed by the Commission for lack of jurisdiction”); *Espinosa v. Cableoptics,*807 So.2d 195, 196 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (confirming that the time limits imposed under section 443.151(4) do not provide for good cause exceptions to the time accorded to file an appeal); *Linderman v. K.B. Beach Suites LTD PTR,*751 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Accordingly, the order on appeal is affirmed.