alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

200 West Street

New York, New York 10282

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC22

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

March 1, 2016

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 10486 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

CHRISTINA ANN WHICHARD,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:11

- CR

- 196

- 7

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM: *

Christina Ann Whichard appeals the district court’s revocation of a

previously imposed term of supervised release and its imposition of a 12

- month

term of imprisonment. Whichard was subject to mandatory revocation and

imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g)(4) for having more than three positive

drug tests over the course of one year. She argues that, because § 3583(g) does

not require a jury determination under a beyond

- a

- reasonable

- doubt standard,

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 20, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-10486 Document: 00515277744 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/20/2020No. 19

- 10486

it is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United

States v. Haymond , 139 S. Ct. 2369, 2380 (2019).

As Whichard concedes, review is for plain error. To prevail on plain error
review, she must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and that affects

her substantial rights. See Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009).

If she makes such a showing, this court has the discretion to correct the error

but only if it “seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of

judicial proceedings.” Id

. (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted).

The decisio n in Haymond addressed the constitutionality of § 3583(k) of

the supervised release statute, and the plurality opinion specifically stated

that it was not expressing any view on the constitutionality of other

subsections of the statute, including § 3583(g)

. See Haymond , 139 S. Ct. at

2382 n.7. Because there currently is no case law from either the Supreme

Court or this court extending Haymond to § 3583(g) revocations, we conclude

that there is no error that was plain. See United States v. Escalante

- Reyes

, 689

F.3d 415, 418 (5th Cir. 2012) (en banc); United States v. Gonzalez , 792 F.3d

534, 538 (5th Cir. 2015).

As Whichard has not demonstrated that the district court committed

plain error, her revocation and term of imprisonment are AFFIRMED

.

2 Case: 19-10486 Document: 00515277744 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/20/2020
EXHIBIT 32.2
 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   (A)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
 (B)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
   May 16, 2011
    
    /s/ Laurie L. LathamDate
    
    Laurie L. Latham 

Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northfield Laboratories Inc. on Form
10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven A. Gould, M.D.,
Chief Executive Officer of Northfield Laboratories Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Northfield Laboratories Inc.

Date: January 9, 2006


/s/ Steven A. Gould, M.D.
-------------------------------------
Steven A. Gould, M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5375-N-39]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         October 8, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                    *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: September 30, 2010.

Mark R. Johnston,

 Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 2010-25025 Filed 10-7-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer
of CV Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: August 8, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ LOUIS G. LANGE, M.D., PH.D.
|                      |  |  |  | Louis G. Lange, M.D., Ph.D.    
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
866 A.2d 982

#### ESTATE OF MICHAEL DEMARTINO, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

January 28, 2005.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF VIEWCAST.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF MARCH
31, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       5,293,542
<SECURITIES>                                 4,922,790
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,256,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                   147,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,702,231
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,274,743
<PP&E>                                       2,874,352
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,548,103
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,206,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,755,914
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         95
<COMMON>                                         1,553
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,449,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,206,848
<SALES>                                      1,796,962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,936,658
<CGS>                                          866,711
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  866,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,040,192
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                30,286
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              70,235
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,070,584)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,070,584)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,070,584)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7372 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7372

   To prevent the changing of regulations governing the provision of 
 waivers under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2018

 Ms. DeLauro introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prevent the changing of regulations governing the provision of 
 waivers under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect SNAP Act''.

SEC. 2. PREVENTING THE CHANGING OF REGULATIONS GOVERNING WAIVERS UNDER 
              THE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    No rule, regulation, proposed rule, policy directive, or guideline 
may be issued or enforced by the Secretary of Agriculture, by the head 
of any entity within the Department of Agriculture (including the Food 
and Nutrition Service), or by any other person or entity that--
            (1) supersedes subsection (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), or (f) 
        of section 273.24 of title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations 
        as in effect on December 1, 2018; or
            (2) modifies the effect or operation of any such subsection 
        as so in effect.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST

CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liberty Property Trust (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, in connection with Rule , that based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR.George J. Alburger, Jr.Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: November 8, 2004
No. 11,474.

#### Wright, Auditor, *v.*Board of Commissioners of Hancock County.

County *Auditor.*— Gravel *Roads.-*— -Taxes.—Fees.—The county auditor was; not entitled to fees for services in placing on the tax duplicate taxes for free gravel roads in the year 1882.

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

*C. G. Offutt*and *R. A. Black,*for appellant.

*J. A. New*and *J. W. Jones,*for appellee.

Elliott, C. J.

The appellant presented the following; claim to the board of commissioners:

> “ Greenpield, Indiana, May 31st, 1883.

> “ Range Line Free Gravel Road Fund.

> “ *To Henry Wright, Auditor, JDr. :*

> “To making duplicates for the year 1882, two duplicates. $40.00.”

We decided in *Wright*v. *Board, etc., ante,*p. 88, that a. county auditor is not entitled to fees for services performed in gravel road proceedings prior to the act of 1883, and subsequent to the act of 1879, and unless this complaint or claim can be regarded as showing that the services were performed under the former act, the ruling must be that the trial court did not err in holding it bad.

The rules in pleadings in cases like this are very liberal. *Board, etc.,*v. *Ritter,*90 Ind. 362. But liberal as are these rules, they do not dispense with all statements of the nature of the claim. The statute provides that “ the-claimant shall file with such commissioners a detailed statement of the items and dates.” *Board, etc.,*v. *Ritter, supra, vide*p. 368. As there must be some statement, it necessarily follows that it must be such as shows a liability on the part of the county. A claim not showing a liability can not support a judgment. *Hoffman*v. *Board, etc.,*96 Ind. 84. It must at least show a case in which there may be a liability. As shown by the *109opinion in *Wright*v. *Board, etc., supra,*and the cases there cited, there can be no liability for services performed prior to the net of 1883, and subsequent to that of 1879. The services in this case were, as the claim shows, performed in 1882, and there is, therefore, no liability. But in addition to this defect, there is a failure to show that the duplicates were prepared in a matter provided for by the act of 1883.

Filed Oct. 29, 1884.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Momo Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jonathan Xiaosong Zhang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                               
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: April 20, 2015
|                     | 
|By:                  |  | /s/ Jonathan Xiaosong Zhang   
|                     |  | Name: Jonathan Xiaosong Zhang 
|                     |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE ex rel. Chuck JARRELL v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2009-KH-2511.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Jarrell, Chuck; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 02-CR2-83980; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 1427.

Denied.
#### Jason Ted GRAY v. Christy Lynn Winnon GRAY.

No. 2011-CJ-0548.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 30, 2011.

In re Gray, Christy Lynn Winnon; Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Morehouse, 4th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 2005-*1239370; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,826-CA.

Granted.

CLARK, J., recused.
## COA# 08-13-00139-CR Daren Marcus Bell v. The 

## STYLE: StateofTexas COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM Publish: NO DATE: 1/30/15 

# 274-/S; FILE COPY


## OFFENSE: 22.02 

## COUNTY: Tarrant TRIAL COURT: Criminal District Court No. 2
TC CASE #: 1304432R



## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS ELECTRONIC RECORD Daren Marcus Bell v. The STYLE: ofTexas i State Petitioi CCA IS: 

# CCA#: 2.7^ i CCADisposition: 

# -IS PRO SE FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN ' DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH: 

# date: Ot/ay/jwr 

# JUDGE: /£t£*lc4^ PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE:
#### Yvette HANNON, as personal representative of the Estate of Nathan Scott Hannon, and on behalf of all survivors, Petitioner, v. SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS, INC., d/b/a Shands at Live Oak, Respondent.

No. 1D10-3688.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 10, 2011.

James W. Gustafson, Jr., of Searcy Den-ney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., Tallahassee; John S. Mills of The Mills Firm, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Susan L. Kelsey of Kelsey Appellate Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This petition for writ of certiorari stems from a post-verdict court order granting, in part, Respondent’s request to interview jurors. Respondent’s motion was filed 18 days late with the trial court. *See*Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.431(h) (requiring motion to interview jurors to be filed within 10 days after the verdict is rendered). Although rule 1.431(h) gives the court discretion to accept an untimely motion to interview jurors if “good cause is shown,” in its order, the trial court struck through an express finding that good cause existed, yet it “deemed” the motion timely filed. We hold that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law by granting Respondent’s motion without finding that good cause existed to excuse the untimely filing. We note, furthermore, that other means are available to attorneys who seek to communicate with jurors. *See*R. Regulating Fla. Bar 4 — 3.5(d)(4); *see also Ramirez v. State,*922 So.2d 386, 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Petition for writ of certiorari is GRANTED. The order granting juror interviews is quashed, and we remand for proceedings consistent with this decision.

BENTON, C.J., DAVIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
#### Frances R. Meccariello et al., Respondents, v Allstate Insurance Company, Appellant.

[775 NYS2d 649]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Edward D. Garni, J.), entered May 9, 2003. The judgment granted plaintiffs’ motion for a declaration that plaintiffs’ notice of claim to defendant was timely.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Pigott, Jr., PJ., Pine, Scudder, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20

- 2909

_____________________________
T ASHA R OYSTER , Appellant,

v.

N ORMAN B URMAN , J EROME M ADISON , P HILLIP M ADISON , J R ., B RENDA R OBINSON , and T HE E STATE OF C LEASTER Y OUNG , Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Angela C. Dempsey , Judge

. September 29, 2021

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(5) (allowing review of orders entered on only “authorized and timely” motions for relief from judgment).

B.L. T HOMAS , B ILBREY , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Tasha Royster, pro se
, Appellant.

Andrew J. Power and Susan S. Thompson of Smith, Thompson, Shaw, Col ó n & Power, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee s

.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 9, 202 1

No. 04

- 21

- 00010

- CV

Marcos MORALES, Appellant

v.

EGZ, LLC, Appellee

From the County Court

, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- CV

- 0298 Honorable Bill Squires , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant, Marcos Morales, filed his pro se notice of appeal on January 8, 2021. On January 12, 2021, this court notified appellant that the followi ng were due no later than January 22, 2021: (1) a docketing statement, (2) the filing fee of $205.00, and (3) an amended notice of appeal with a certificate of service showing the court reporter was served

.

On January 21, 2021, appellant filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file the docketing statement, an affidavit of indigence, and an amended notice of appeal. On that same date, appellant filed of “Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal

Bond. ”

Appellant’s request for an extension of time is GRANTED. The docketing statement and amended notice of appeal with a certificate of service showing the court reporter was served are

due no later than February 24, 202 1

.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of February, 20 21

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court