alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) usbank® | (logo) All of us serving you ® |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------|

 

 

Annual Statement of Compliance

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.,

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC21

 

VIA: EMAIL

 

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

390 Greenwich Street, 5th Floor

New York, New York 10013

Attention: Paul Vanderslice

Email: paul.t.vanderslice@citi.com

 

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor for

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, 

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC20

200 West Street

New York, New York 10282

Attention: Leah Nivison

Email: leah.nivison@gs.com

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator for

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, 

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-GC20

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, Maryland 21045

Email:  trustadministrationgroup@wellsfargo.com

Email:  cts.sec.notifications@wellsfargo.com

Attention: SEC Notifications

 

 

 

Re:           Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2014 (the “Agreement”) between Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as the Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as the Operating Advisor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as the Certificate Administrator and Trustee.

 

 

 

I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as a certifying servicer hereby certify that:

 

         (1) A review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of the performance of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

 

          (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such Reporting Period. 

 

 

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

 

 

Date: March 24, 2015

 

 

U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator

 

By:  /s/ Kimberly O. Jacobs

Kimberly O. Jacobs

Senior Vice President
#### Gabrielle L. DANIELS, Allariet S. Howard and Maryta B. Hullaby v. IMPERIAL FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 2010-CC-2736.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

In re Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Company; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 538,140a; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,109-CW.

Denied.
#### Shaunn Caillier (McCorvey) HARDEN v. Derriel Carlton McCORVEY.

No. 2010-CJ-2780.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re McCorvey, Derriel Carlton; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 02-C-*8802619-D; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-551.

Not considered, not timely filed.
#### In re Randy P. ZINNA.

No. 2011-OB-0543.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 25, 2011.

ORDER

In October 2010, respondent pled guilty to mail fraud in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana. Respondent now seeks to permanently resign from the practice of law in lieu of discipline. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) has concurred in respondent’s petition.

Having considered the Petition for Permanent Resignation from the Practice of Law filed by Randy P. Zinna, Louisiana Bar Roll number 13801, and the concurrence thereto filed by the ODC,

IT IS ORDERED that the request of Randy P. Zinna for permanent resignation in lieu of discipline be and is hereby granted, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.1 and Rule 5.5 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Randy P. Zinna shall be permanently prohibited from practicing law in Louisiana or in any other jurisdiction in which he is admitted to the practice of law; shall be permanently prohibited from seeking readmission to the practice of law in this state or in any other jurisdiction in which he is admitted; and shall be permanently prohibited from seeking admission to the practice of law in any jurisdiction.

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this 25th day of April, 2011.

/s/ Bernette J. Johnson /s/ Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana
#### Clifford HOPKINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-2138.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 10, 2011.

Clifford Hopkins, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging .ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

DAVIS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arander Matthew HUGHES, Jr., a/k/a Randy Hughes, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 99-4425.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 30, 2000.

Decided Jan. 8, 2001.

*128Sean P. Devereux, Sean P. Devereux, P.A., Asheville, NC, for appellant. Mark T. Calloway, United States Attorney, Brian Lee Whisler, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, NC, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Arander Matthew Hughes, Jr., was convicted of three counts of robbery in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(1994), two counts of bank robbery, five counts of use and carry of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) (1994), and two counts of carrying an unregistered short-barreled shotgun, 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d) (1994). He was sentenced to a total of 1120 months imprisonment. We affirm.

On appeal, Hughes argues that: (l)the district court plainly erred in admitting prior consistent statements of government witnesses; there is insufficient evidence to support his convictions for unlawful possession of a sawed-off shotgun; and (3) there is insufficient evidence to support the Hobbs Act convictions in the absence of the jurisdictional element of an interstate commerce nexus. We have reviewed the briefs submitted by the parties, and the material presented in the joint appendix, and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm Hughes’ convictions and sentences. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,585
<ALLOWANCES>                                       493
<INVENTORY>                                     13,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,801
<PP&E>                                           5,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,360
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,520
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,112
<SALES>                                         12,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,277
<CGS>                                           10,207
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (520)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (259)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (261)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (261)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2446]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

[Docket ID USAF-2009-0052]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by March 8, 
2010.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Air Force Academy Secondary School 
Transcript; USAF Form 148; OMB Number 0701-0066.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 7,954.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 7,954.
    Average Burden per Response: .75 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 5,966 hours.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to obtain data on candidate's background and aptitude in determining 
eligibility and selection to the Air Force Academy.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: January 26, 2010.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-2446 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### Leetta ALLEN-HAYNES and Gladys Allen, et al. v. ANIOMA HOME HEALTH CARE, INC. and Darrick M. Franklin.

No. 2010-CC-2228.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Anioma Home Health Care, Inc.; Franklin, Darrick M.; —Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. L, No. 2000-5258; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-C-0863.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1676 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1676

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2007

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To reauthorize the program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
          Development for loan guarantees for Indian housing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Native American Home Ownership 
Opportunity Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. LOAN GUARANTEES FOR NATIVE AMERICAN HOUSING.

    Section 184(i) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 
(12 U.S.C. 1715z-13a(i)) is amended as follows:
            (1) Outstanding aggregate limitation.--In paragraph (5)(C), 
        by striking ``fiscal years 1997 through 2007'' and inserting 
        ``fiscal years 2008 through 2012''.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--In paragraph (7), by 
        striking ``fiscal years 1997 through 2007'' and inserting 
        ``fiscal years 2008 through 2012''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 24, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25014]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


South River Watershed Dam No. 10A, Augusta County, VA

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service.

ACTION: Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102[2][c] of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969, the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations 
[40 CFR part 1500]; and the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
Regulations [7 CFR part 650]; the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives notice that an 
environmental impact statement is not being prepared for the 
rehabilitation of South River Watershed Dam No. 10A, Augusta County, 
Virginia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John A. Bricker, State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1606 Santa 
Rosa Road, Suite 209, Richmond, Virginia 23229. Telephone (804) 287-
1691, E-Mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9fd5fefcf4b1ddedf6fcf4faeddfe9feb1eaecfbfeb1f8f0e9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95dff4f6febbd7e7fcf6fef0e7d5e3f4bbe0e6f1f4bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment of this 
federally assisted action indicates that the project will not cause 
significant local, regional, or national impacts on the environment. As 
a result of these findings, John A. Bricker, State Conservationist, has 
determined that the preparation and review of an environmental impact 
statement is not needed for this project.
    The project purpose is continued flood prevention. The planned 
works of improvement include upgrading an existing floodwater retarding 
structure.
    The Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has been 
forwarded to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and to various 
Federal, State, and local agencies and interested parties. A limited 
number of the FONSI are available to fill single copy requests at the 
above address. Basic data developed during the environmental assessment 
are on file and may be reviewed by contacting John A. Bricker at the 
above number.
    No administrative action on implementation of the proposal will be 
taken until 30 days after the date of this publication in the Federal 
Register.

    [This activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance under 10.904, Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention, 
and is subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12372, which 
requires inter-government consultation with State and local 
officials].

    Dated: September 24, 2010.
John A. Bricker,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 2010-25014 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
 SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Matias Gaivironsky, as Chief Financial Officer of the company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;


(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.





Cresud S.A.C.I.F y A.October 30, 2013
By:
/s/ Matias GaivironskyMatias GaivironskyChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. James ROCHE.

No. 2010-K-0930.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Roche, James; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. N, No. 07-6392; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-KA-684.

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2481]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR10-6-000]


Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corporation; Notice of Petition for Rate 
Approval

January 29, 2010.
    Take notice that on January 15, 2010, Arkansas Oklahoma Gas 
Corporation (AOG) filed a petition for rate approval pursuant to 
section 284.123(b)(2) of the Commission's regulations. AOG requests 
that the Commission approve a decrease in its maximum interruptible 
transportation rate from $0.1502 to $0.0515 per MMBtu and a decrease 
for company fuel use and lost and unaccounted for gas charge from 2.87 
percent to 2.65 percent.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1f595a4d5c50717376717a4c6a6f6f706d6b5f797a6d7c31787069"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4929186979bbab8bdbab187a1a4a4bba6a094b2b1a6b7fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern time on Friday, February 12, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-2481 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MELITA INTERNATIONAL CORP. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,684
<SECURITIES>                                    22,756
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,737
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,450
<INVENTORY>                                      1,260
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,121
<PP&E>                                          14,954
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,239
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,308
<SALES>                                         93,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,410
<CGS>                                           34,682
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,691
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,258
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,573
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,685
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,685
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74
        

</TABLE>