alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61756-61757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25196]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[IB Docket No. 04-286; DA 10-1884]


Sixth Meeting of the Advisory Committee for the 2012 World 
Radiocommunication Conference

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, this notice advises interested persons that the sixth meeting 
of the WRC-12 Advisory Committee will be held at the Federal 
Communications Commission. The purpose of the meeting is to continue 
preparations for the 2012 World Radiocommunication Conference. The WRC-
12 Advisory Committee will consider any preliminary views and draft 
proposals introduced by the WRC-12 Advisory Committee's Informal 
Working Groups.

DATES: October 26, 2010, 11 a.m. to 12 noon.

[[Page 61757]]


ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 
Room TW-C305, Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexander Roytblat, Designated Federal 
Official, WRC-12 Advisory Committee, FCC International Bureau, 
Strategic Analysis and Negotiations Division, at (202) 418-7501.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Communications Commission 
established the WRC-12 Advisory Committee to provide advice, technical 
support and recommendations relating to the preparation of United 
States proposals and positions for the 2012 World Radiocommunication 
Conference (WRC-12).
    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 
92-463, as amended, this notice advises interested persons of the sixth 
meeting of the WRC-12 Advisory Committee. The WRC-12 Advisory Committee 
has an open membership. All interested parties are invited to 
participate in the WRC-12 Advisory Committee and to attend its 
meetings. The proposed agenda for the sixth meeting is as follows:

Agenda

Sixth Meeting of the WRC-12 Advisory Committee, Federal Communications 
Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Room TW-C305, Washington, DC 20554, 
October 26, 2010, 11 a.m. to 12 noon.

    1. Opening Remarks.
    2. Approval of Agenda.
    3. Approval of the Minutes of the Fifth Meeting.
    4. Informal Working Group Reports and Documents Relating to 
Preliminary Views
    and Draft Proposals.
    5. Future Meetings.
    6. Other Business.

Federal Communications Commission.
Roderick K. Porter,
Deputy Chief, International Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2010-25196 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 26, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-0639 Lower Tribunal No. 21-17485 CC

________________ 

### Miami Mold & Water Solutions, a/a/o Eugenia Santana , Appellant, vs. 

### Citizens Property Insurance Corporation ,

Appellee. An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Myriam Lehr, Judge. Font & Nelson, PLLC, and Jose P. Font, and Malcolm R. Pedraza (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellant. Luks, Santaniello, Petrillo, Cohen & Peterfriend, and Daniel S. Weinger (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellee. Before EMAS, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Adjei v. First Cmty. Ins. Co., 352 So. 3d 900 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022).
#### Leslie V. McMILLAN, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D08-3002.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 25, 2009.

Leslie V. McMillan, in proper person.

Garnett W. Chisenhall, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN and SUAREZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Shojaie v. Gables Court Prof'l Ctr., Inc.,*974 So.2d 1140, 1141-42 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (holding that employee failed to provide the appellate court with a record sufficient to review the matter on appeal, requiring affirmance); *Mendez v. Fla. Dep’t of Health,*943 So.2d 909, 911 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (“The Board’s imposition of a penalty is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.”).
SNODGRASS
Certified Public Accountants and Consultants




              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To the Shareholders and
the Board of Directors
of Sistersville Bancorp, Inc.

We consent to  incorporation  by  reference  of our report dated April 20, 2001,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Sistersville  Bancorp, Inc. as of
March 31, 2001 and 2000,  and the  related  consolidated  statements  of income,
comprehensive  income,  stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the two
years in the period ended March 31, 2001.  Said report  appears as Exhibit 13 of
Sistersville Bancorp, Inc.'s annual Form 10-KSB.


/s/S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wheeling, West Virginia
June 20, 2001


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                      <C>
S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
980 National Road Wheeling, WV 26003-6400 Phone: 304-233-5030 Facsimile: 304-233-3062
</TABLE>
[Cite as State v. Johnson, 2014-Ohio-1751.] 

 

Criminal Appeal From: Hamilton County Municipal Court 

 

Judgment Appealed From Is: Affirmed in Part, Sentence Vacated, and 

 Cause Remanded 

Date of Judgment Entry on Appeal: April 25, 2014 

Terry Nester, Acting City Solicitor, Charles Rubenstein, City Prosecutor, and Eric 

Cook, Assistant City Prosecutor, for Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 

David Hoffman, for Defendant-Appellant. 

Please note: this case has been removed from the accelerated calendar. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO 

STATE OF OHIO, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 vs. 

JOSHUA JOHNSON, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

:

: 

: 

: 

: 

APPEAL NO. C-130435 

TRIAL NO. 12CRB-29399 

O P I N I O N.
OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

2 

DINKELACKER, Judge. 

{¶1} In one assignment of error, defendant-appellant Joshua Johnson 

claims that the trial court improperly modified his sentence after it had been 

imposed. The state concedes the error, and we agree. 

{¶2} On June 19, 2013, Johnson was sentenced to 180 days in jail for 

aggravated menacing. The trial court imposed 90 days, suspended the remainder, 

and placed him on one year of community control. The trial court ordered Johnson 

to be evaluated while he was in custody to determine if he was amenable to 

substance-abuse treatment. On June 28, Johnson was returned to court. The trial 

court then resentenced him to 180 days in jail, with the expectation that he would be 

participating in a treatment program. On July 8, the trial court denied Johnson’s 

motion to mitigate his sentence, finding that he had not complied with treatment 

recommendations. 

{¶3} Johnson argues that once he had been sentenced on June 19, the trial 

court lost jurisdiction to modify the sentence. We agree. Generally, Ohio trial courts 

lack the authority to reconsider their own valid final judgments in criminal cases. State 

v. Gilbert, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. C-110382, 2013-Ohio-238, ¶ 5, citing State v. Raber, 

134 Ohio St.3d 350, 2012-Ohio-5636, 982 N.E.2d 684, paragraph one of the syllabus. 

Once the trial court sentenced Johnson and that entry was journalized, that judgment 

became final. Id. At that point, the trial court lost jurisdiction to modify Johnson’s 

sentence. 
OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

3 

{¶4} Since the trial court improperly modified Johnson’s sentence after it had 

become final, we sustain Johnson’s sole assignment of error. We vacate Johnson’s 

sentence and remand this cause to the trial court to reinstate the original sentence 

entered on June 19. We affirm the judgment of the trial court in all other respects. 

Judgment affirmed in part, sentence vacated, and cause remanded. 

CUNNINGHAM, P.J., and HILDEBRANDT, J., concur. 

Please note: 

 The court has recorded its own entry on the date of the release of this opinion.
#### LODGE NO. 743, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 377, Docket 28555.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 26, 1964.

Decided May 26, 1964.

Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D. C. (Plato E. Papps, Washington, D. C., and William S. Zeman, Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for petitioner.

Melvin J. Welles, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Lee M. Modjeska and William Wachter, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In open court we deny the petition of the union to set aside so much of the Board’s order, 144 N.L.R.B. No. 56, as dismissed so much of the complaint as charged a violation of § 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (3) and (1) because of the company’s refusal to allow time off to Butler J. Seedman, president of Lodge No. 743, to attend a conference with an agent of the Board.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT MARCH 31, 1998
(UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          20,544
<SECURITIES>                                     8,068
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,814
<ALLOWANCES>                                       765
<INVENTORY>                                      3,479
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,931
<PP&E>                                          12,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,099
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,867
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,066
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           155
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,404
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,867
<SALES>                                         19,267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,267
<CGS>                                            7,335
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,335
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,614
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,909
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,705
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,705
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>
HMN Financial, Inc.
                    Computation of Earnings Per Common Share
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                               Three months ended         Nine Months ended
                                 September 30,                September 30,
                               1999         1998          1999        1998
                             -----------------------    -----------------------

<S>                         <C>          <C>           <C>        <C>
Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding
  used in basic earnings per
  common share calculation    4,269,133    5,038,496     4,399,444   5,038,496

Net dilutive effect of:
 Options                        201,673            0       185,251     358,514
 Restricted stock awards         13,630            0        20,019      54,344
                             ----------    ---------     ---------    --------

Weighted average number of
  shares outstanding adjusted
  for effect of dilutive
  securities                  4,484,436    5,038,496     4,604,714   5,451,354
                             ==========   ==========     =========   =========

Net income (loss) available
 to common shareholders     $ 1,414,960     (434,240)    4,813,307   2,013,145

Basic earnings per common
  share                     $      0.35        (0.09)         1.09        0.40

Diluted earnings per
  common share              $      0.33        (0.09)         1.05        0.37

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   (A)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and(B)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
   November 14, 2005
    
    /s/ George C. PlattDate
    
    George C. PlattChief Executive Officer
 1




---



##### 



STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   (A)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and(B)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
   November 14, 2005
    
    /s/ Laurie L. LathamDate
    
    Laurie L. LathamChief Financial Officer
 2
#### Greg MATTOX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D09-6430.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 16, 2011.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Pamela D. Presnell, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Donna A. Gerace, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the judgment and sentence entered after he was found guilty by a jury of two counts of armed robbery. Appellant contends the trial court erroneously overruled his objection to the prosecution’s questions concerning the nature of the crime for which he was on probation after Appellant had already admitted on direct examination that he was on probation for a felony. The State properly concedes error, and we reverse. *See Rodriguez v.*State, 761 So.2d 381, 383 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (holding, “When the witness admits his or her convictions, a trial court errs by allowing the State to question the witness about the specific convictions.”). Accord, *Kyle v. State,*650 So.2d 127, 127-28 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

REVERSED and REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

VAN NORTWICK, THOMAS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
#### Richard L. REYNOLDS v. Robert BORDELON III, Robert Bordelon Jr., USAgencies Casualty Insurance Company, Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange, and/or Called Auto Club Family Insurance d/b/a “Triple A Insurance,” Nissan North America with Nissan Being a Parent Company of Infinity Division of North America, Inc., A Luxury Car Division of Nissan Motors, Insurance Auto Auctions Corp., ABC Insurance, DEF Insurance Company, and XYZ Insurance Company.

No. 2010-CC-1719.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 29, 2010.

In re Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 2009-11451; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 0379.

Denied.

VICTORY and GUIDRY, JJ., would grant.
Exhibit 99.4


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liberty Property Limited
Partnership (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR., Chief Financial Officer
of Liberty Property Trust (the sole general partner of Liberty Property
Limited Partnership), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

	(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



/s/ GEORGE J. ALBURGER, JR.
-----------------------------------
George J. Alburger, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61238-61239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24989]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7193]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Expanding the Story With Four Greek Vases''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Expanding the Story with Four Greek 
Vases,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or

[[Page 61239]]

display of the exhibit objects at the Art Institute of Chicago, 
Chicago, Illinois, from on or about October 18, 2010, until on or about 
September 30, 2013, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 27, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-24989 Filed 10-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### STATE ex rel. John BALLAY v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KP-1394.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re: Ballay, John; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 97-5533; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 08-WR-1197, 08-KM-738, 08-KM-739, 08-KM-788, 09-KH-3.

Denied.
Exhibit 32.2

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 906**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terry L. Stevens, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ TERRYL.STEVENS                                                |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Terry L. StevensSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| May 9, 2008                                             |   |
#### Robert KALTENBACH v. Dianne Sue NELSON.

No. 2010-C-2567.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re Kaltenbach, Robert; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Evangeline, 13th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 71200-A; to *889the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-160.

Denied.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1264 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the dollar limitation 

on contributions to funeral trusts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2007 

Mr. KIND (for himself, Mr. MATHESON, Mr. CAMP of Michigan, Mr. TIBERI, 

and Mr. WILSON of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the dollar limitation on contributions to funeral trusts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF DOLLAR LIMITATION ON CON4 TRIBUTIONS TO FUNERAL TRUSTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 685 of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to treatment 

7 of funeral trusts) is repealed. 

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsections (d), 

9 (e), and (f) of such section are redesignated as subsections 

10 (c), (d), and (e), respectively. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1264 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### STATE ex rel. Stanley LINDSEY v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2009-KH-2691.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Lindsey, Stanley; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 03-05-0854; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 1424.

Denied.
SNODGRASS
Certified Public Accountants and Consultants



              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To the Shareholders and
the Board of Directors
of Sistersville Bancorp, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference of our report dated April 12, 2002,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Sistersville Bancorp, Inc. as of
March 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income,
comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the two
years in the period ended March 31, 2002. Said report appears as Exhibit 13 of
Sistersville Bancorp, Inc.'s Annual Form 10-KSB.



/s/S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wheeling, West Virginia
June 19, 2002



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                     <C>
S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
980 National Road   Wheeling, WV 26003-6400    Phone: 304-233-5030    Facsimile: 304-233-3062
</TABLE>