alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Allen SCOTT.

No. 2010-KK-2633.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 30, 2010.

In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 489-041; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-1656.

Stay denied. Writ denied.

VICTORY and KNOLL, JJ., would grant.
#### Richard Francis BARR *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 98-328

970 S.W.2d 243

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered June 11, 1998

*Kenneth Fuchs,*for appellant.

*Winston Bryant,*Att’y Gen., by: *David R. Raupp,*Sr. Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Richard Francis Barr was convicted of rape. His counsel, Kenneth Fuchs, filed a notice of appeal on December 5, 1997. An order was entered by the circuit court on December 11, 1997, relieving Mr. Fuchs as Mr. Barr’s counsel. The record was lodged with this Court on March 18, 1998. Mr. Barr’s brief was due April 20, 1998, but it has yet to be filed.

The State has moved to dismiss the appeal for failure of Mr. Barr to file a brief. A response to the motion was filed by Mr. Fuchs who stated that he had been relieved and suggesting that counsel be appointed to handle the appeal of Mr. Barr who is indigent.

We decline to dismiss the appeal. Arkansas R. App. P. — Criminal 16 provides:

> Trial Counsel, whether retained or court appointed, shall continue to represent a convicted defendant throughout any appeal to the Arkansas Supreme Court, unless permitted by the *577trial court or the Arkansas Supreme Court to withdraw in the interest of justice or for other sufficient cause. *After the notice of appeal of a judgment of conviction has been filed, the Supreme Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to relieve counsel and appoint new counsel.*[Emphasis supplied.]

Mr. Fuchs remains the counsel of record in this Court for Mr. Barr. The Clerk will set a briefing schedule.
# Four th Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

August 31, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00340

- CR

EX PARTE DAVID RAMIREZ

- HERNANDEZ

,

From the 25th Judicial District Court

, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21

- 1135

- CV

- C Honorable William D. Old III , Judge Presid ing



### O R D E R

The record in this habeas corpus appeal was complete August 30, 2021. We order appellant’s brief due September 20, 2021. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 31.1; 4th Tex. App. (San Antonio) Loc. R. 8.2. The brief of the State is due within 20 days after the date appellant’s brief is filed. Id. A reply brief, if any, must be filed within 10 days after the State’s brief is filed. Id.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 31st day of August, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ
, Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7494

JOSE HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

JOHN R. OWEN,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District 

Judge. (4:10-cv-02069-CMC)

Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 25, 2011

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jose Hernandez, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 

(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Hernandez v. Owen, No. 

4:10-cv-02069-CMC (D.S.C. Oct. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-60484 Summary Calendar

CLAVER J. SMITH, Plaintiff–Appellant v. ALCORN STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant–Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5:10-CV-198
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Claver Smith, the App e l l a n t , alleges that Alcorn State University, the Appellee, unlawfully discriminated against her based on her age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) , specifically 29 U.S.C. § 6 2 3(a). Smith filed a claim with the Equal Employment Opport u n i ty Commission (“EEOC”) on September 23, 2009. On August 23, 2010, the EEOC issued Smith a right-to-sue letter. S m i t h di d not, however, file her suit until U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Novembe r 30, 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion s houldnot * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-60484 Document: 00511680294 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/30/2011No. 11-60484

December 16, 2010—116 days after the issuance of the right-to-sue letter. The Appellee filed a motion to dismiss based on Eleventh Amendment immunity and

a motion for summary judgment based on the time bar. The di s trict court granted both motions. “A plaintiff alleging employment discrimination must file a civil action no
more than ninety days after she receives statutory notice of her right to sue from the EEOC. The ninety-day window is strictly construed and is a precondition to filing s u i t i n di strict court.” Duron v. Albertson’s LLC, 560 F.3d 288, 290 (5th Cir. 2009) (internal quotation m arks, citations, and footnotes omitted). Smith claims that she filed her suit on N o v e mb e r 22, 2010 (within the ninety-day window), but there is no evidence in the record to support this. We therefore AFFIRM the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the Appellee. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 11-60484 Document: 00511680294 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/30/2011
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Owosso Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 26, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, George B. Lemmon, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                  March 11, 2003

                                      /s/ George B. Lemmon, Jr.
                                      --------------------------
                                      George B. Lemmon, Jr.
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                            (principal executive officer,
                                              principal financial officer and
                                               principal accounting officer)
v136814_ex10-41 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing

 

    EXHIBIT
10.41
Col 

### FIRST DI ’IRT,OF APPEALS FOR THE

;TRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON MEMORANDUM ORDER Appellate case name: 

### Jong W. Kim and Susan Kim v. Jin Ahn Appellate case number: 

### 01-11-00231-CV 

### Trial court case number: 0636177 Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County 

### Jin Ahn’s motion for rehearing is denied.
It is so ORDERED. 

### Judge’s signature:/s/Rebeca Huddle

V1 Acting individually [] Acting for the Court 

### Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
Date: January_ 11,2013
#### John COPELAND, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-2268.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 13, 2010.

John Copeland, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner is hereby granted a belated appeal of the May 6, 2009, judgment and sentence in Duval County Circuit Court case number 16-2008-CF-14377-AXXX-MA. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as the notice of appeal. Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent petitioner on appeal.

LEWIS, ROWE, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
#### Susan THORNTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D10-1941.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 1, 2010.

Susan Thornton, pro se.

ALTENBERND, Judge.

Susan Thornton appeals the trial court’s order denying her motion for postconviction relief. She argues that her original sentence was a true split sentence and that she could not be sentenced on a violation of community control to more than the suspended term. She is mistaken. The sentence, in the words of Ms. Thornton’s counsel, is “convoluted,” but it is not a true split sentence.

In 2006, Ms. Thornton pleaded guilty to escape from confinement. She negotiated a sentence of two years’ community control, followed by three years’ probation. As part of her sentence, she was to participate in PAR, a residential drug treatment program. Because that program did not have a bed immediately available and Ms. Thornton was subject to a subpoena to testify in a murder trial, the trial court imposed a term of 865 days in jail that would be suspended when a bed was available and her subpoena had expired. The trial court intended this short term in jail, as announced, to be a condition of either her community control or probation.

*199When Ms. Thornton was transferred to PAR, she quickly absconded. Thereafter, upon the entry of the order vacating her community control, the trial court had the authority to impose any lawful sentence. The ten-year term of imprisonment that the trial court imposed is a lawful term for this second-degree felony. *See*§ 944.40, Fla. Stat. (2006). The 365 days in jail was not imposed as the initial term of imprisonment in a true split sentence, and the trial court was not limited by that sentence when imposing the sentence on violation of community control.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI and KHOUZAM, JJ, Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATIONS





The undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of Valley Financial Corporation, certifies that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).





Date:  November 12, 2010
By:
/s/ Kimberly B. SnyderChief Financial Officer
| (logo)  WELLS

            FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreementdated as of May 1, 2014, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGESECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asGeneral Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as General SpecialServicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as Co-op SpecialServicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and asCustodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-C20 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton,Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer duringthe period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “ReportingPeriod”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has beenmade under my supervision, and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the GeneralMaster Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 62569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-25204]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on High Efficiency 
Dilute Gasoline Engine II

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 1, 2010, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research 
Institute--Cooperative Research Group on High-Efficiency Dilute 
Gasoline Engine II, (``HEDGE II'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Continental Automotive GMBH, Regensburg, 
Germany, has been added as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and HEDGE II intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On February 19, 2009, HEDGE II filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on April 2, 2009 (74 FR 15003).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 22, 
2010. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on May 6, 2010 (75 FR 24972).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-25204 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 27, 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00811

- CV

ROBERT R. BURCHFIELD , Appellant

V.

HOUSTON COMMUNITY BA NK , Appellee

On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris Coun ty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 27653



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from a summary judgment signed June 4 , 201 2 . On September
19 , 2012, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted

. A ccordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison.
#### In re Peter Edward CASTAING.

No. 2011-OB-1069.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 2011.

In re Castaing, Peter Edward; -Plaintiff; Applying For Permission to Take Bar Examination.

Denied. See Supreme Court Rule XVII, Section 4(C)
Exhibit 32.2

         Certification of Chief Financial Officer of FirstBank NW Corp.
  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on From 10-K of FirstBank
     NW Corp. ("the Company") for the year ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report"),
     I, Larry K. Moxley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
     pursuant to 19 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted to Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          o    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
               and

          o    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the Company's financial condition and results
               of operations.


     /s/ LARRY K. MOXLEY
     ------------------------------------------
     Larry K. Moxley, Chief Financial Officer

     Dated:  June 10, 2005
**Exhibit32.1**

**Thefollowing certification is furnished pursuant to the requirements of theSecurities and Exchange Commission and shall not be deemed “filed” for thepurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwisesubject to the liability of that section. Such certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference intoany filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, except to the extent that such certification is specifically incorporatedby reference by the registrant.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Metro One Telecommunications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Gary E. Henry, ChiefExecutive Officer and Duane C. Fromhart, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:  | August 14, 2006 | /s/ Gary E. Henry        |   |
|--------|-----------------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |            | Gary E. Henry            |
|   |            | President                |
|   |            | Chief Executive  Officer |
|   |            |                     |
|   |            |                     |
|        |            | /s/ Duane C. Fromhart    |   |
|   |            | Duane C.  Fromhart       |
|   |            | Senior Vice  President   |
|   |            | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

1

----
647 A.2d 467

#### IN THE MATTER OF BEVERLY M. WURTH, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 16, 1994.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court on the motion of BEVERLY M. WURTH, for the termination of the proctorship ordered by this Court on March 23, 1993, and the Office of Attorney Ethics having interposed no objection to said application, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion to terminate the proctorship imposed by this Court’s Order of March 23, 1993, is granted.
#### James Allen HARRISON, Jr. v. STATE of Alabama.

CR-05-2411.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 25, 2010.

James Fredrick Barger, Jr., Birmingham; Lisa Wright Borden, Birmingham; and Susan S. Wagner, Birmingham, for appellant.

Troy King, atty. gen., and Michael A. Nunnelley, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.

*On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court*

MAIN, Judge.

In an unpublished memorandum issued on August 21, 2007, this Court affirmed *992the circuit court’s summary denial of the Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition for post-conviction relief filed by James Allen Harrison, Jr. *See Harrison v. State,*(No. CR-05-2411) 14 So.3d 197 (Ala.Crim.App.2007) (table).1 The Alabama Supreme Court reversed this Court’s judgment and remanded the cause for this Court to remand the cause to the circuit court for “an evidentia-ry hearing on the merits of Harrison’s juror-misconduct claims and a determination as to whether Harrison is entitled to a new trial.” *Ex parte Harrison,*61 So.3d 986, 991 (Ala.2010). Accordingly, we remand this cause to the Russell Circuit Court for proceedings consistent with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion. Due return shall be filed in this Court within 42 days of the release of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.*

WISE, P.J., and WELCH, WINDOM, and KELLUM, JJ., concur.

1

. Judge Main was not on the Court when the unpublished memorandum affirming the circuit court’s order was issued. The case was assigned to Judge Main when the Alabama Supreme Court remanded it to this Court.

*

 Note from the reporter of decisions: On October 29, 2010, on return to remand, the Court of Criminal Appeals dismissed the appeal, without opinion.
#### STATE ex rel. Kevin A. ALEXANDER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0697.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 1, 2011.

In re Alexander, Kevin A.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 01-597; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 08-WR-946.

Denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                               HMN FINANCIAL, INC.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HMN Financial, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael McNeil,
President of the Company, and Jon Eberle, Senior Vice President and CFO of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Date: August 4, 2005              /s/ Michael McNeil
                                  Michael McNeil
                                  President/Chief Executive Officer
                                  (Principal Executive Officer)

                                  /s/ Jon Eberle
                                  Jon Eberle
                                  Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
                                  (Principal Financial Officer)