alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2518]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Bonneville Power Administration


Electrical Interconnection of the Lower Snake River Wind Energy 
Project

AGENCY: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Department of Energy 
(DOE).

ACTION: Notice of Availability of Record of Decision (ROD).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to offer 
Puget Sound Energy Inc., a Large Generator Interconnection Agreement 
for interconnection of up to 1250 megawatts of power into the Federal 
Columbia River Transmission System. The power would be generated from 
their proposed Lower Snake River Wind Energy Project (Wind Project) in 
Garfield and Columbia counties, Washington. To interconnect the Wind 
Project, BPA will construct a new substation (Central Ferry Substation) 
on the Little Goose-Lower Granite 500-kilovolt transmission lines near 
the Port of Central Ferry, Washington. This decision to interconnect 
the Wind Project is consistent with and tiered to BPA's Business Plan 
Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0183, June 1995), and the 
Business Plan Record of Decision (BP ROD, August 1995).

ADDRESSES: Copies of this tiered ROD and the Business Plan EIS may be 
obtained by calling BPA's toll-free document request line, 1-800-622-
4520. The RODs and EIS are also available on our Web site, http://www.efw.bpa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tish Eaton, Bonneville Power 
Administration--KEC-4, P.O. Box 3621, Portland, Oregon 97208-3621; 
toll-free telephone number 1-800-622-4519; fax number 503-230-5699; or 
e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#93e7f8f6f2e7fcfdd3f1e3f2bdf4fce5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a7d3ccc2c6d3c8c9e7c5d7c689c0c8d1">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Issued in Portland, Oregon, on January 28, 2010.
Stephen J. Wright,
Administrator and Chief Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-2518 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Edward TILLMAN.

No. 2011-KK-0557.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 30, 2011.

In re Tillman, Edward; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. A, No. 451-855; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0057.

Denied.
Exhibit 99.1

         Certification of Chief Executive Officer of FirstBank NW Corp.
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, that:

     o    The report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and


     o    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the company's financial condition and results of
          operations.



/s/ CLYDE E. CONKLIN
-----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  June 9, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000921182
<NAME>                          Empiric Energy, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                            1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                            185,285
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      19,603
<ALLOWANCES>                                       24,244
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  204,888
<PP&E>                                          5,146,542
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,664,919)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  2,695,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             378,480
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                        46,281
<COMMON>                                            4,725
<OTHER-SE>                                      7,386,972
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    2,317,334
<SALES>                                            91,658
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   91,658
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     736,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 33,560
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (630,613)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (630,613)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (630,613)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.07)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1



Subsidiaries of NSTAR



|                                 |  |                       
|-------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|                                 |  | State of Incorporation
|Boston Edison Company            |  | Massachusetts         
|                                 | 
|Commonwealth Electric Company    |  | Massachusetts         
|                                 | 
|Cambridge Electric Light Company |  | Massachusetts         
|                                 | 
|Canal Electric Company           |  | Massachusetts         
|                                 | 
|NSTAR Gas Company                |  | Massachusetts         
|                                 | 
|Hopkinton LNG Corp.              |  | Massachusetts         
|                                 | 
|Advanced Energy Systems, Inc.    |  | Massachusetts         
|                                 | 
|Harbor Electric Energy Company   |  | Massachusetts         
|                                 | 
|BEC Funding LLC                  |  | Delaware              
|                                 | 
|BEC Funding II, LLC              |  | Delaware              
|                                 | 
|CEC Funding, LLC                 |  | Delaware              
|                                 | 
|NSTAR Communications, Inc.       |  | Massachusetts         
|                                 | 
|MATEP, LLC                       |  | Delaware              
|                                 | 
|NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation |  | Massachusetts
#### Eugene COLLINS v. Craig FOLSE, M.D., et al.

No. 2010-CC-2565.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re Collins, Eugene; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of East Carroll, 6th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 21,145; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46059-CW.

Denied.
#### Felix THOMAS v. Danny WILLIAMS, Castle Creek Truck Services, LLC and Zurich American Insurance Company.

No. 2010-CC-2564.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re Thomas, Felix; —Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 519,395; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,-004-CW.

Denied.
#### Mark MIKULSKI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D10-625.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 15, 2011.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Ailene S. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

GRIFFIN, J.

Mark Mikulski [“Mikulski”] appeals the trial court’s denial of his 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief in which he asserted nine grounds for relief. Mikulski argues that the trial court erred by summarily denying grounds one, two, three, four, seven, and eight. He also argues that the trial court erred by denying grounds five and six after an evidentiary hearing. We find error only in the summary denial of the claims concerning an alleged conflict of interest based on the claim that Mikulski’s counsel also represented the State’s key witness, Cornelius, and a witness for the defense, Martinez. The record does not conclusively refute Mikulski’s claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Indeed, it is unclear whether counsel personally represented these three men or whether it was the office of the Public Defender. Nor is it clear what the nature of the representation was or why or when it occurred. An evidentiary hearing will be required to determine whether there was an actual conflict, and we remand for that purpose. In all other respects, the appealed order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ., concur.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 AUGUST 12, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-11386

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00050-CR-4-SPM-WCS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

GUS DASHER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

 (August 12, 2008)

Before CARNES, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Gus Dasher, has filed a motion to
2

withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of

the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the

appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no

issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and

Dasher’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0001035039
<NAME>                       INVU, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                 1
<CURRENCY>                   U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   615
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     126,590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                157,478
<PP&E>                          121,201
<DEPRECIATION>                  41,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  237,239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           429,558
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        288,355
<OTHER-SE>                      (902,867)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    237,239
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                8,267
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   698,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,492
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              (6,419)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (694,809)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (694,809)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.02)




</TABLE>
Exhibit
10.45


 


January 8, 2009


 


Mr. Anthony Hicks


Otter Tail Ag Enterprises,
LLC


24096 170th Ave.


Fergus Falls, MN 56537-7518


 


RE:  Limited Tangible Net Worth Covenant Waiver


 


Dear Anthony:


 


Please be advised that
AgStar Financial Services, PCA (“AgStar”) with the agreement and consent of the
participating lenders to that certain Amended and Restated Master Loan
Agreement between Otter Tail Ag Enterprises, LLC (“OTAE”) and AgStar dated June 23,
2008 (the “Master Loan Agreement”), has approved your request to provide the
following limited waiver, effective as of the Completion Date.  Terms used but not defined in this letter
shall have the meaning assigned to them in the Master Loan Agreement.


 


AgStar hereby acknowledges
its waiver of the requirement that OTAE (a) furnish to AgStar certain
audited financial statements within ninety (90) days of the end of OTAE’s 2008
fiscal year, as required under Section 5.01(c)(i) of the Master Loan
Agreement; and (b) achieve Tangible Net Worth of $43,000,000.00 on the
Completion Date and as of September 30, 2008 (the end of OTAE’s 2008
fiscal year), as required under Section 5.01(e) of the Master Loan
Agreement.  OTAE’s failure to comply with
the specific covenants indicated above on the specific dates indicated above
shall not be deemed by AgStar to be an Event of Default under the terms of the
Master Loan Agreement; the next reporting date for such requirements shall be
as set forth in the Master Loan Agreement, prior to October 1, 2009.  OTAE agrees that AgStar’s waiver is limited
as set forth above and that the terms and conditions of the Master Loan
Agreement and the other Loan Documents shall remain in full force and effect.


 


Except as expressly provided
herein, nothing in this letter constitutes a (i) waiver of any default,
Event of Default, or breach of covenants or agreements by OTAE under the Master
Loan Agreement or the other Loan Documents; or (ii) waiver of any rights
or remedies of AgStar under the Master Loan Agreement or the other Loan
Documents.


 


If there are any questions
please give me a call.


 


Sincerely,


 

















 


AGSTAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, PCA,


 


 


	
  /s/ Ron Monson

  	
   

  
	
  By: Ron Monson

  
	
  Its: Vice President
650 A.2d 335

#### IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH F. FLAYER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

December 9, 1994.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that JOSEPH F. FLAYER of BUDD LAKE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, be publicly reprimanded for violating *RPC*1.1(a) (gross neglect), *RPC*1.3 (failure to act with diligence), *RPC*1.4(a) and (b) (failure to communicate and to explain a matter to extent necessary for client to make informed decisions) and *RPC*3.2 (failure to expedite litigation); and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and JOSEPH F. FLAYER is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Office of Attorney Ethics and the Disciplinary Review Board for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT RESTAURANT CORP.
REPORT ON FORM 10-K DECEMBER 28, 2004 CERTIFICATION BY JAMES K. ZIELKE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of Total Entertainment Restaurant Corp. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that the Form 10-K of the Company for
the year ended December 28, 2004 (the Annual Report) accompanying this certification fully
complies with the requirements of the Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The
foregoing certification is incorporated solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be used for any other purpose. Date
    

March 25, 2005
    
    
    
    /s/ James K. ZielkeJames K. Zielke
Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1734 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1734

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 630 Northeast Killingsworth Avenue in Portland, Oregon, as the ``Dr. 
                 Martin Luther King, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 630 Northeast Killingsworth Avenue in Portland, Oregon, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Martin 
Luther King, Jr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1734

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 630 Northeast Killingsworth Avenue in Portland, Oregon, as the ``Dr. 
                 Martin Luther King, Jr. Post Office''.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET OF JOURNAL REGISTER COMPANY AT DECEMBER 26, 1999 AND
THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 26, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                               6,495
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                       57,521
<ALLOWANCES>                         3,443
<INVENTORY>                          9,104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    79,359
<PP&E>                             223,841
<DEPRECIATION>                     119,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     657,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               74,167
<BONDS>                            494,635
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                               484
<OTHER-SE>                         (56,210)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       657,350
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   463,969
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      260,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    27,616
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     4,195
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  49,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    261,956
<INCOME-TAX>                        90,951
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                169,381
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                       169,381
<EPS-BASIC>                            3.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                          3.72





</TABLE>
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. LOCAL 1291, INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN’S ASSOCIATION and International Longshoremen’s Association and Their Agents James T. Moock, Clifford Carter and Richard Askew, Respondents.

No. 14737.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 22, 1964.

Decided June 4, 1964.

*560Joseph C. Thackery, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner.

Martin J. Vigderman, Philadelphia, Pa. (Abraham E. Freedman, Freedman, Landy & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondents.

Before KALODNER, GANEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board found that respondents violated Section 8(b) (4) (i) (ii) (B) and (D) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended,1 by inducing and encouraging employees of Jarka Corporation, to engage in a strike or refusal in the course of their employment to perform services, and by threatening, coercing, and restraining officials of Pennsylvania Sugar Division, National Sugar Refining Company, and officials of Jarka with the dual objects of: (a) forcing or requiring Jarka to cease doing business with National, and (b) forcing or requiring National to assign certain sugar sampling work and the operation of a rotary railroad car dump at National’s Philadelphia refinery to employees represented by respondent Local 1291, rather than to National’s employees represented by Local 1648 Sugar Refinery Workers, AFL-CIO.

The Board’s Order, now presented for enforcement, requires respondents to cease and desist from engaging in, or inducing or encouraging any individual employed by Jarka or any other employer, to engage in a strike or refusal in the course of his employment, to perform any services, or from threatening, coercing, or restraining National, Jarka, or any other employer, where an object thereof, in either case is: (1) to force or require Jarka or any other employer to cease doing business with National; (2) to force or require National to assign sampling or rotary railroad dump work to employees represented by Local 1291 rather than to employees represented by Local 1648. The Order also directs respondents to post appropriate notices.

On review of the record we cannot say that it is lacking in substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings, or that the Board’s assessment of the conduct and motivations of the respondents transgressed the permissible limits of discretion confided to it by the Act. National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp. et al., 373 U.S. 221, 83 S.Ct. 1139, 10 L.Ed.2d 308 (1963).

For the reasons stated the Board’s petition for enforcement will be granted.

1

. 29 U.S.C.A. § 158.