alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
South Jersey Gas Company (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Edward J. Graham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Edward J. Graham
------------------------------------
Name:  Edward J. Graham
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2005
#### J. A. McDowell et al. v. E. W. Nicholson.

(No. 2923.)

Appeal from Jack County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 268. *Citation; sufficiency of.*The citation summoned the defendants to appear “on the third Monday of July, 1883,” without stating the day of the month, but stated that said time was “the next regular term of said court.” *Held,*that it sufficiently stated the *time,*and was in the usual form in this respect. [R. S. art. 1443.]

§ 269. *Return on citation; insufficiency of.*The return on the citation was as follows: “Came *bo*hand the 4th day of June, A. D. 1883, at four o’clock P. M., and executed on the 16th day of June, 1883, by delivering to J. A. McDowell, T. C. Rector and G. W. Moore, the within named defendants, in person, a true copy of this writ.” *Held,*that this was an insufficient return. Each of the defendants was entitled to service of a copy of the citation. [R. S. art. 1219.] 'It does not appear from this return that such service was made, but, on the contrary, it appears that all three of the defendants together, were served with one copy of the citation. [Covingtons v. Burleson, 28 Tex. 368; Willis v. Bryan, 33 Tex. 429.]

§ 270. *Days of grace; suit prematurely brought.*Our statute provides, that “three days of grace sha;l be allowed on all bills of exchange and promissory notes assignable or negotiable by law.” [R. S. art. 276.] Our supreme court, in construing this statute, have said, that this is a legislative announcement that three *entire*days are meant, and that a note does not mature until the expiration of three entire days after the date of payment, and that a suit cannot be maintained against the maker until after the expiration of these three entire days. *204[Watkins v. Willis, 58 Tex. 521.] In this case the suit was upon a negotiable note, which fell due June 1, 1883. The suit was instituted June 4, 1883. *Held,*that the three days of grace had not expired, and that the suit was prematurely brought.

June 21, 1884.

Reversed and remanded.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**MATTHEW SCOTT DIEHL,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 368 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 25th day of October, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
Exhibit 12


                            SOUTH JERSEY GAS COMPANY
 Calculation of Ratio of Earnings from Continuing Operations to Fixed Charges
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                               Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
                                    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              2003            2002           2001           2000            1999
                                    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                         <C>             <C>            <C>             <C>             <C>

Net Income*                                 $26,608         $23,222        $21,527         $21,855         $20,367

Income Taxes, Net                            19,619          17,372         15,693          16,703          15,445

Fixed Charges**                              19,868          20,972         23,409          24,255          24,033

Capitalized Interest                           (564)           (359)          (221)            (24)           (390)
                                    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total Available for Coverage                $65,531         $61,207        $60,408         $62,789         $59,455
                                    ===============================================================================

Total Available                                3.3x            2.9x           2.6x            2.6x            2.5x
------------------------------------
Fixed Charges

<FN>


 *  Net Income before Discontinued Operations

**  Fixed charges consist of interest charges and preferred
     dividend requirement amounting to $135,000 in 2003 ( rentals are not material).
</FN>
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Western Ohio Financial
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John W. Raisbeck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


By:  /s/ John W. Raisbeck
Name:  John W. Raisbeck
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60407-60408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24584]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Permit 
Application Project Titled: Fine Scale, Long-Term Tracking of Adult 
White Sharks

AGENCY: Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean 
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 
Department of Commerce (DOC).

ACTION: Draft environmental assessment; notice of availability; request 
for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary (GFNMS) 
has developed a draft environmental assessment (EA) pursuant to the 
National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.) to analyze 
the potential impacts of issuing a research permit that would allow the 
attraction and approach of white sharks in the sanctuary. The purpose 
of the proposed study is to improve our knowledge of the full migratory 
cycle of white sharks by attaching location transmitters to up to 
eleven (11) white sharks that seasonally visit the sanctuary. The EA is 
available for download on the web site: http://farallones.noaa.gov/eco/sharks/pdf/ea_mcsi_permit2009.pdf.

DATES: Comments on this draft environmental assessment may be made on 
or before October 15, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Mail: Carliane Johnson, Acting Permit Coordinator, Gulf of 
the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary, The Presidio, 991 Marine 
Drive, San Francisco, CA 94129.

[[Page 60408]]

    <bullet> E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#016260736d68606f642f6b6e696f726e6f416f6e60602f666e77"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b787a6977727a757e35717473756874755b75747a7a357c746d">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carliane Johnson, Acting Permit 
Coordinator, Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary, The 
Presidio, 991 Marine Drive, San Francisco, CA 94129. Phone: (703) 969-
5544.

    Dated: September 24, 2010.
Daniel J. Basta,
Director for the Office of National Marine Sanctuaries.
[FR Doc. 2010-24584 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-NK-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT JUNE 30, 1997
(UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,659
<SECURITIES>                                     7,699
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                       708
<INVENTORY>                                      3,256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,859
<PP&E>                                           7,732
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,153
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              152
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,562
<SALES>                                         33,775
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,775
<CGS>                                           12,058
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,287
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,430
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,395
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,035
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,035
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        



</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Zzeundre Babbinbenell JACOBS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-1956.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2012.

In re Jacobs, Zzeundre Babbinbenell;— Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rapides, 9th *1281Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 279,752; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW11-00650.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. The district attorney is ordered to provide relator with an estimate of the costs of reproducing public records relator has requested and to which relator is entitled. La. Const, art. XII, § 3; R.S. 44:31; R.S. 44:31.1; *State ex rel. Leonard v. State,*96-1889 (La.6/13/97), 695 So.2d 1325; *State ex rel. Level v. State,*99-2266 (La.12/17/99), 751 So.2d 869; *Range v. Moreau,*96-1607 (La.9/3/96), 678 So.2d 537; *see also Landis v. Moreau,*00-1157, p. 6 (La.2/21/01), 779 So.2d 691, 695.
Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (registration statement numbers 333-30519 and 333-64445)
of FirstBank NW Corp. and on Form S-8 (registration statement number 333-110265)
of Oregon Trail Financial Corp. of our report dated April 23, 2004, relating to
the consolidated financial statements of FirstBank NW Corp., which appear in
FirstBank NW Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB as of and for the year ended
March 31, 2004.



/s/ Moss Adams LLP


Spokane, Washington
June 9, 2004
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Waypoint Financial Corp.
(the "Company") for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
H. Moss, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ James H. Moss
-----------------
James H. Moss,
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



March 12, 2004
June 21, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals QUINCY JEJUAN NEELYS , Appellant NO. 14

- 11

- 00632

- CR , NO. 14

- 11

- 00639

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED, the appellant pay all costs expended in this appeal, a nd that this decision be certified below for observance
.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000921052
<NAME>                    WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS IV, L.P., SERIES 4
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             618,082
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   618,082
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,184,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,088,666
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,184,177
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    (1,362)
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       43,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   319,481
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (364,511)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (364,511)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (364,511)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0




</TABLE>
645 A.2d 133

#### IN THE MATTER OF PEDRO J. BATALLA JR., AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

August 10, 1994.

ORDER

PEDRO J. BATALLA, JR., of YONKERS, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, having pleaded guilty to income tax evasion, in violation of 26 *U.S.C.A.*7201, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*1:20 — 6(b)(1), PEDRO J. BATALLA, JR., is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that PEDRO J. BATALLA JR., be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that PEDRO J. BATALLA, JR., comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.55


                             OCEAN POINT TECH CENTRE



January 25, 2001



VISTA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
5451 Avenida Encinas, Suites A,B,C,J & K
Carlsbad, CA  92008

Dear Mr. Lyon:

Please accept this as Amendment Two to your Lease dated July 7, 1998 by and
between Pleta & San Gal Trust Dba: Ocean Point Tech Centre as Lessor and Vista
Medical Technologies Inc., as Lessee for 5451 Avenida Encinas, Suites A,B,C,J
&K, Carlsbad, California.

Ocean Point Tech Centre has agreed to extend your current lease for 5451 Avenida
Encinas, Stes A,B,C,J & K through January 31, 2002 at the following rental
rates.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Date                       Base Rent        NNN               Total Rent
----                       ---------        ---               ----------
<S>                        <C>              <C>               <C>
02/01/01-01/31/02          $9,360.00        $975.00           $10,335.00

</TABLE>


All other terms and conditions of The Subject Lease will remain the same.


Agreed & Accepted                           PLETA & SAN GAL TRUST
                                            Dba:  OCEAN POINT TECH CENTRE


Date_____________                           ___________________________
                                            William H. Adair
                                            Executive Vice President

Agreed & Accepted                           VISTA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.


Date_____________                           ___________________________
                                            John Lyon, President
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert BOTT.

No. 2011-KO-0457.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 2011.

In re Bott, Robert; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Vermilion, 15th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 48,475; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-0726.

Denied.
## NO. 12

- 10

- 00 1 4 0

- C V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

SIM EO N LEBLEU

, APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 3RD

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT CO URT OF

CHRISTOPHER HOLEMAN , ' ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE MEMORANDUM OPINIO N PER CURIAM According to his notice of appeal, Appellant, Simeon LeBleu, attempts to appeal the “directive of the 3rd Dist. Court’s order sending this matter to the O.I.G. of TX Dept of Cr Justice.” On May 13, 2010, this court notified LeBleu that the i nformation received in this appeal does not include a final judgment or other appealable order. Therefore, the record does not show that this court has jurisdiction of the appeal. LeBleu was further notified that his appeal would be dismissed if the info rmation received in the appeal was not amended on or before June 14, 2010 to show the jurisdiction of this court. The trial court clerk has now sent us an order denying “Plaintiff’s Petition to Appear Before the County Grand Jury.” This order is neither a final judgment nor an appealable order. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.2, 42.3. Opinion delivered July 7 , 20 10

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
856 A.2d 1201

#### Derrick R. COOMBS, Appellant, v. Michelle GWINN, State Attorney General Civil Rights Enforcement Division, PA. State Police, Donald Kelchner & Jeffrey Beard, Secretary Off Corrections, as Custodians, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 30, 2004.

*531
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th July, 2004, probable jurisdiction is noted and the order appealed is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-57891 on Form S-4, 333-29069 on Form S-8 and 333-43291 on Form S-8 of
Crescent Operating, Inc. of our report on the consolidated financial statements
of Vornado Crescent Logistics Operating Partnership dated February 20, 2002
(March 11, 2002 as to Note 4) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Crescent Operating, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
April 29, 2002
**Exhibit      10(e)(xi)**

----

**WHEREAS**

**WHEREAS**

**WHEREAS**

**NOW,      THEREFORE**

----

----

----

----

----

**EXHIBIT      A**

| Point(s)                of Receipt                               | Maximum                Daily Quantity (dt/day)1    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                             |                                                              |
| Pooling                Station 210 at the existing Point of      | 105,000                                                           |
| Interconnection                between Seller’s Leidy Line |                                                              |
| and                Seller’s Mainline in Mercer County,     |                                                              |
| New                Jersey.                                       |                                                              |

----

**EXHIBIT      B**

| Point(s)                of Delivery and Pressure                  | Maximum                Daily Quantity (dt/day) 1   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |                                                              |
| Proposed                “Repaupo Meter Station” to be | 105,000                                                           |
| located                adjacent to Seller’s Woodbury line   |                                                              |
| in                the City of Repaupo in Logan Township,          |                                                              |
| Gloucester                County, New Jersey.                     |                                                              |

----

----