alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Ronald S. Bass, Principal Accounting Officer of Usurf America, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that:

      I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Usurf America, Inc.

      Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual
Report.

      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods, presented in the report.

      I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company
and have:

      (d)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
            disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
            supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
            Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
            me by others within those entities, particularly during the period
            in which the periodic report is being prepared;

      (e)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
            procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
            effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
            end of the period covered by this Annual Report based on such
            evaluation; and

      (f)   disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Company's internal
            control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
            most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
            reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal
            control over financial reporting; and

      I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and to the audit committee
of the Board of Directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

      (j)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
            control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
            adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
            and report financial information; and

      (ii)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
            internal control over financial reporting.


Dated:  March 31, 2005



/s/ Ronald S. Bass
----------------------------
Name: Ronald S. Bass
Principal Accounting Officer
#### Timothy THOMAS, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D10-2977.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Nov. 12, 2010.

Timothy Thomas, Jr., Palatka, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence in case numbers 07-1819-CF, 07-1857-CF, and 07-2006-CF, in the Circuit Court in and for Putnam County, Florida. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-K"), I William W. Krippaehne Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:  March 20, 2003

                                           /s/ William W. Krippaehne Jr.
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       William W. Krippaehne Jr.
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer


*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fisher Communications, Inc., and will be retained by Fisher
Communications, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 906**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Highwoods Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terry L. Stevens, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ TERRYL.STEVENS                                                |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Terry L. StevensSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| March 2, 2008                                           |   |
EXHIBIT 23


<PAGE>

[LOGO]
CRISP
HUGHES
EVANS                                 Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
LLP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                  Affiliated worldwide through AGN International



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




     As  independent  auditors,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation  of our
report,  dated  January 25,  2001,  by  reference  in this annual  report of SFB
Bancorp,  Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December  31,  2000,  into the
Company's previously filed Form S-8 Registration Statement File No. 333-76337.





                                                    /s/Crisp Hughes Evans LLP
                                                    -------------------------


Asheville, North Carolina
March 22, 2001




                                  500 Ridgefield Court          828 254 2254
                                  PO Box 3049                   Fax 828 254 6859
                                  Ashville, NC 28802            www.che-llp.com
The HONORABLE ANDREW W. BOGUE, United States District Judge for *

the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2788

___________

Richard Breen, a Minor, by and through *

his Next Friend Linda Breen; Frank *

Breen; Linda Breen, *

*

Plaintiffs - Appellants, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

St. Charles R-VI School District; Mark * District Court for the

Keen; J. Larry Milan; Jerry E. Reese; * Eastern District of Missouri.

Marta Baier; Jean Meyer; Gary Lacey; *

Wayne Oetting; Diane Rallo; Missouri * [UNPUBLISHED]

Department of Elementary and *

Secondary Education; Robert E. *

Bartman; John Heskett, *

*

Defendants - Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: February 12, 1998

Filed: April 15, 1998

___________

Before McMILLIAN and LOKEN, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE, District Judge. *

___________
The HONORABLE E. RICHARD WEBBER, United States District Judge for 1

the Eastern District of Missouri.

-2-

PER CURIAM.

Ricky Breen is a learning disabled teenager. In February 1994, Ricky was

attending public middle school in St. Charles, Missouri. School officials and Ricky’s

parents were involved in developing a new individualized education program (IEP) for

Ricky when a controlled substance was found in his school locker. The IEP team

shifted its attention to this problem. It determined that Ricky’s possession of the

controlled substance was a manifestation of his disability. Alternative discipline was

therefore imposed, and the team continued its work on a revised IEP. Before a new IEP

was implemented, Ricky’s parents enrolled him in a private school and requested a due

process hearing under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C.

§§ 1400 et seq., seeking reimbursement of his private school tuition on the ground that

public school officials had failed to provide him a free appropriate public education.

See 20 U.S.C. § 1415; Mo. Rev. Stat. § 162.961.

A panel convened under state law decided that the School District had offered

Ricky a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment. A state

level Review Officer affirmed. Ricky and his parents then commenced this action

seeking judicial review under § 1415(e)(2) and asserting additional claims under Section

504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794; 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and state law.

Conducting its IDEA review in accordance with the standard of review we described

in Independent Sch. Dist. No. 283 v. S.D., 88 F.3d 556, 561 (8th Cir. 1996), the district

court granted summary judgment for all defendants, agreeing with the panel that Ricky 1

had been provided a free appropriate public education and rejecting various objections

to the state administrative procedures. The Breens appeal, raising numerous substantive

and procedural issues. After careful review of the record and consideration
-3-

of the parties’ contentions on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district

court’s thorough Memorandum and Order dated May 16, 1997. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

THOMAS JEFFREY ROBERTS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2317

[December 30, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Charles A. Schwab, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 562012CF000217A.

Thomas Jeffrey Roberts, Bristol, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1617 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1617

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 561 Kingsland Avenue in University City, Missouri, as the ``Harriett 
                    F. Woods Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HARRIETT F. WOODS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 561 Kingsland Avenue in University City, Missouri, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Harriett F. Woods Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Harriett 
F. Woods Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1617

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 561 Kingsland Avenue in University City, Missouri, as the ``Harriett 
                    F. Woods Post Office Building''.
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT RESTAURANT CORP.
REPORT ON FORM 10-K DECEMBER 28, 2004 CERTIFICATION BY JAMES K. ZIELKE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of Total Entertainment Restaurant Corp. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that the Form 10-K of the Company for
the year ended December 28, 2004 (the Annual Report) accompanying this certification fully
complies with the requirements of the Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The
foregoing certification is incorporated solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be used for any other purpose. Date
    


    April 21, 2005
        
/s/ James K. ZielkeJames K. Zielke Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: AYDIN T. ONER,

Debtor.

______________________________

AYDIN T. ONER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE

ASSOCIATION; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-15506

D.C. No. 2:14-cv-01604-JCM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2016** 

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

FILED

DEC 21 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Aydin T. Oner appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his

bankruptcy appeal for failure to file an opening brief. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d), 1291. We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s

dismissal for failure to prosecute. Moneymaker v. CoBen (In re Eisen), 31 F.3d

1447, 1451 (9th Cir. 1994). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Oner’s appeal

after granting Oner two extensions of time to file an opening brief and warning that

a failure to comply may result in dismissal. The district court properly exercised

its discretion in determining that the delay prejudiced defendants and interfered

with the district court’s ability to manage its docket. See id. (“A reviewing court

will give deference to the district court to decide what is unreasonable because it is

in the best position to determine what period of delay can be endured before its

docket becomes unmanageable” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

Because we affirm the district court’s dismissal for failure to prosecute, we

do not consider Oner’s challenges to the bankruptcy court’s decisions or the

district court’s interlocutory orders. See Morrissey v. Stuteville (In re Morrissey),

349 F.3d 1187, 1190 (9th Cir. 2003); Al-Torki v. Kaempen, 78 F.3d 1381, 1386

(9th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED.

2 15-15506
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# SUMMARY:

The Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command (SDDC) is providing notice that it is releasing an interim change to the MFTURP No. 1 on October 1, 2010. The interim change updates Section B, Item 21, Detention: Vehicles With Power Units (DEP).

# ADDRESSES:

                        Submit comments to Publication and Rules Manager, Strategic Business Directorate, Business Services, 1 Soldier Way, Building 1900W, ATTN: SDDC-OPM, Scott AFB 62225. Request for additional information may be sent by e-mail to:                         *chad.t.privett@us.army.mil*                         or                         *george.alie@us.army.mil.*

      ( print page 60437)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Chad Privett, (618) 220-6901, or Mr. George Alie, (618) 220-5870.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Reference:*                     Military Freight Traffic Unified Rules Publications (MFTURP) No. 1.                

*Background:*                     The MFTURP No. 1 governs the purchase of surface freight transportation in the Continental United States (CONUS) by DoD using Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) exempt transportation service contracts.                

Section B, Item 21, has been updated in order to clearly define Tank Truck/Bulk Fuel free time and the provisions of free time in general.

*Miscellaneous:*                     This publication, as well as the other SDDC publications, can be accessed via the SDDC Web site at:                     *http://www.sddc.army.mil/​Public/​Global%20Cargo%20Distribution/​Domestic/​Publications/​.*

Henry Brooks,

Chief, SDDC, G9, Business Execution.

[FR Doc. 2010-24590 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                          PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the
"Report") of Cimnet, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002,
I, John D. Richardson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

         (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   the information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                       /s/ JOHN D. RICHARDSON
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       John D. Richardson
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Accounting Officer

March 28, 2003
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Booker COX et al.

No. 16419.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Feb. 24, 1960.

Charles W. Atkinson, U. S. Atty., and Robert E. Johnson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Fort Smith, Ark., for appellant.

Ted Coxsey, J. E. Simpson, Berryville, Ark., and E. J. Ball, Fayetteville, Ark., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed, on motion of appellant.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1676 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1676

   To reauthorize the program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
          Development for loan guarantees for Indian housing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2007

Mr. Boren (for himself, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Renzi, and Mr. 
   Kildee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To reauthorize the program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
          Development for loan guarantees for Indian housing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Native American Home Ownership 
Opportunity Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. LOAN GUARANTEES FOR NATIVE AMERICAN HOUSING.

    Section 184(i) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 
(12 U.S.C. 1715z-13a(i)) is amended as follows:
            (1) Outstanding aggregate limitation.--In paragraph (5)(C), 
        by striking ``fiscal years 1997 through 2007'' and inserting 
        ``fiscal years 2008 through 2012''.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--In paragraph (7), by 
        striking ``fiscal years 1997 through 2007'' and inserting 
        ``fiscal years 2008 through 2012''.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00229-CV

NO. 02-14-00231-CV

IN RE DENTON COUNTY FRESH 

WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT NO. 

11-A

RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

TRIAL COURT NO. 2013-60435-393

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and 

petition for temporary injunctive relief and is of the opinion that relief should be 

denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and petition for 

temporary injunctive relief are denied.2

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GARDNER and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 4, 2014

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).

2

Therefore, we deny real party in interest’s motion to extend the time to file 

a response.