alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
857 A.2d 672

#### Siddeeq JACKSON *&*Bashera Abdul-Hadi, H/W, v. METRO NISSAN, INC. Petition of Bashera Abdul-Hadi.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 8, 2004.

*541
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2004, the above-captioned Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issues:

(1) What elements are necessary for making out a *prima facie*claim for a private consumer cause of action under the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, 73 P.S. § 201-1 *et*seg.(“UTPCPL”)(as amended); and

(2) Whether the trial court erred when it entered a non-suit regarding Petitioner’s UTPCPL claim.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Eric Dale MICKELSON.

No. 2011-KK-0436.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2011.

In re Mickelson, Eric Dale; ■ — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 4, No. 262,256; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,276-KW.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                     PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>         454,239
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>             0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>             83,556
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>          109,869
<OTHER-ASSETS>                      1,449
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    649,113
<COMMON>                            5,848
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>         102,817
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                56,120
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>    164,785
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              35,000
<PREFERRED>                         2,224
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>              175,860
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                 45,900
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>               0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>       8,876
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>               0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>             0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                        0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>    216,468
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>     649,113
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>         327,548
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>               11,559
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>        275,993
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>        287,552
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>            39,996
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                      0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>     39,996
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>           17,996
<NET-INCOME>                       22,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>         2,102
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>      19,898
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>           15,300
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>          15,165
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>             39,788
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        8.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                        8.51
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7154 

To replace drinking water fountains in playgrounds and parks under the 

Reducing Lead in Drinking Water Grant Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2018 

Ms. MENG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To replace drinking water fountains in playgrounds and 

parks under the Reducing Lead in Drinking Water Grant 

Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Drinking Water 

5 in Playgrounds and Parks Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPLACING DANGEROUS PARK AND PLAYGROUND 

7 DRINKING WATER FOUNTAINS. 

8 Section 1459B(b)(3)(B)(ii) of the Water Infrastruc9 ture Improvements For The Nation Act (42 U.S.C. 300j– 

10 19b(b)(3)(B)(ii)) is amended by inserting ‘‘playground, 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7154 IH

1 park,’’ after ‘‘address lead levels in water for human con2 sumption at a school, daycare,’’. 

Æ 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
#### John B. Weber et al. v. Henry B. Childs et al.

*Assignment for benefit of creditors*— Chattel *mortgages*— Preferences.

This case is ruled by *Warner v. Littlefield,*89 Mich. 329, and *Fitzgerald v. McCandlish,*Id. 400.

Appeal from Saginaw. (Gage, J.)

Argued February 18, 1892.

Decided March 4, 1892.

Bill to declare certain chattel mortgages an assignment for the benefit of creditors, and void for preferences, etc. Defendants appeal.

Decree reversed, and decree entered *499dismissing complainants’ bill.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Herbert A. Forrest,*for complainants.

*Wisner & Draper,*for defendants.

Long, J.

The complainants seek by this bill to have certain chattel mortgages given by one Charles W. Meyers to certain of his creditors declared an assignment with preferences, and the mortgagees decreed to hold the property covered by said mortgages, of which they have possession under the mortgages, in trust for all the creditors of said Meyers. The bill also prays that a receiver be appointed to take possession of the property, collect and sell the same, and hold the proceeds until the final decree of the court.

The defendants are mortgagees who have accepted under the mortgages. One of the mortgages was given to one Horace Johnson in trust for 26 of the creditors of Meyers. The complainants were among the creditors so secured, but who have not accepted the terms of the mortgage; it being subject to other mortgages, bearing earlier date. There is no claim of fraud in giving the mortgages by Meyers, but the claim is that the complainants are deprived of their right to a fair share of the property. It is not claimed by the bill but that every claim secured or attempted to be -secured by the mortgages is a *bona ficle*indebtedness, and no charge of fraud is averred against the mortgagees, who are made parties defendant.

A part of the mortgagees who are made defendants demurred to the bill. The demurrer was overruled, and defendants appeal.

The case falls so clearly within the cases of *Warner v. Littlefield,*89 Mich. 329, and *Fitzgerald v. McCandlish,*Id. *500400, that a discussion of the questions involved is wholly unnecessary. The present case must be ruled by those cases. They had not been decided at the time of the hearing of the present case in the court below, or presumably that court would have followed them.

The court was in error in overruling the demurrer, and its decree must be reversed, with costs of both courts, and a decree entered here dismissing complainants’ bill.

The other Justices concurred.
Exhibit 32.2





                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of Amendment No. 1 on Form 10K/A to the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of South Jersey Gas Company (the "Company") for the
period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Kindlick, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ David A. Kindlick
--------------------------------------
Name: David A. Kindlick
Title: Chief Financial Officer
July 28, 2004
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jamie EUGUI, Appellee.

No. 4D10-1225.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 25, 2011.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Diane F. Medley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Dea Abramschmitt, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the dismissal of the information charging appellee with one count of delivery of a counterfeit controlled substance. *See*§ 831.31, Fla. Stat. (2009). The trial court based the dismissal on a motion appellee filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(c)(4). The state filed a traverse which set forth specific facts which, in the light most favorable to the state, establish appellant’s knowing participation in the drug transaction. For example, a coconspirator told the state’s confidential informant that the crack was in transit, and that the informant “needed to wait for [appellee], who was in the bar, to go get the crack.” Appellee told the informant to wait for him in a bar, went to a codefendant’s house, and returned with another codefendant who made the hand-to-hand transaction. To survive a motion to dismiss, “the state need not produce evidence sufficient to sustain a conviction. *1186So long as the state shows the barest prima facie case, it should not be prevented from prosecuting.” *State v. Bailey,*508 So.2d 1268, 1269 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (internal citations omitted).

GROSS, C.J., HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1722 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1722

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
601 Banyan Trail in Boca Raton, Florida, as the ``Leonard W. Herman Post 
                                Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LEONARD W. HERMAN POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 601 Banyan Trail in Boca Raton, Florida, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Leonard W. Herman Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Leonard W. 
Herman Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### STATE ex rel. Daniel RONQUILLE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0525.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 25, 2011.

In re Ronquille, Daniel; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 06-5856; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-KA-231.

Denied.
Exhibit
10.2

      


      Synposis
of Agreement between Shanghai Sunplus Communication Technology Co., Ltd. And
Huizhou Liyin Electronics Co., Ltd. – Fujian QiaoXing Industry Co.,
Ltd.

      


      


      Date
of Agreement:

      


      December
31, 2008

      


      Parties
to Agreement:

      


      
        
          	
                  Seller:

                	
                  Shanghai
      Sunplus Communication Technology Co., Ltd., a 95% Chinese subsidiary of
      T-Bay Holdings, Inc. (“Sunplus”)

                
	 	 
	Purchaser:	Huizhou
      Liyin Electronics Co., Ltd.
(“Huizhou”)


        

      

       

      Terms:

      


      Sunplus
is selling 80% interest of its subsidiary Fujian QiaoXing Industry Co., Ltd. to
Huizhou at a price of RMB84,000,000, with an initial payment of RMB2,000,000 to
be paid within two days of the date of the agreement and the remaining balance
of RMB82,000,000 to be paid within three months of the completion of the
transaction.  The transaction is expected to be completed by March
2009.
#### John GOULAS and Vernon Wilkins v. B & B OILFIELD SERVICES, INC. John Goulas, et al. v. B & B Oilfield Services, Inc.

No. 2011-C-1951.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

In re B *&*B Oilfield Services Inc.;— Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certio-rari and/or Review, Parish of Iberia, 16th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 115978; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Nos. 10-934,10-1393.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ABR INFORMATION SERVICES, INC. FOR THE THIRD QUARTER
ENDED APRIL 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      25,937,415
<SECURITIES>                               115,753,334
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,755,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           157,550,964
<PP&E>                                      45,191,151
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             253,710,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       37,513,233
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       286,918
<OTHER-SE>                                 208,602,824
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               253,710,284
<SALES>                                     57,796,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            57,796,368
<CGS>                                       33,138,519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,213,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               440,022
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (4,042,292)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             19,051,662
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,614,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         12,437,362
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,437,362
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Ronald B. Raup, Interim Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB/A of MakeMusic, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  January 25, 2007 By:  /s/ Ronald B. Raup    Ronald B. Raup        Interim Chief Financial Officer
#### Gwendolyn JONES and Sandra Durbin v. RUSTON LOUISIANA HOSPITAL COMPANY, L.L.C. d/b/a Northern Louisiana Medical Center a/k/a Lincoln General Hospital, et al.

No. 2011-CC-1970.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

*947In re Lincoln General Hospital; Northern Louisiana Medical Center; Ruston Louisiana Hospital Company, L.L.C., et al.; — Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lincoln, 3rd Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 54,465; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,356-CW.

Denied.
EX-10.10






Exhibit 10.10




Non-Employee Directors’ Compensation



In fiscal 2009, non-employee directors will receive compensation as outlined in the table below:




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Compensation Rate
	 	 	Fiscal 2009
	Monthly Board member retainer
	 	$	1,500	 
	Fee per Board meeting attended
	 	$	1,250	 
	Fee per Audit Committee meeting attended
	 	$	1,000	(1)
	Fee per Compensation Committee meeting attended
	 	$	1,000	(1)
	Fee per Governance Committee meeting attended
	 	$	1,000	(1)
	Fee per Investment Review Committee meeting attended
	 	$	500	 
	Annual stipend for Chairman of the Board
	 	$	4,000	 
	Annual stipend for Audit Committee Chair
	 	$	3,000	 
	Annual stipend for Compensation Committee Chair
	 	$	2,000	 








 




			
	(1)	 	The Chairs of the Audit, Compensation and Governance Committees will receive 1.5 times the
meeting fee for each committee meeting to reflect the work and preparation required as chair
for such meetings.




Directors who are otherwise employees of the Company do not receive any additional compensation for
their service on the Board or any of its committees.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. James Edward BURNS.

No. 2010-KO-2449.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

In re Burns, James Edward; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Madison, 6th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 127229; to *474the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,539-KA.

Denied.
** **

** **

**EXHIBIT 32**

                                                            

**Certification Pursuantto**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

** **

** **

Thiscertification is provided pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the periodended March 31, 2007 of Tripos, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").

** **

The undersigned, theChief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  herebycertifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)        the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

(b)        information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.  

                                                            /s/John P. McAlister

                                                            JohnP. McAlister

                                                            ChiefExecutive Officer

                                                            &Chief Financial Officer

                                                            June20, 2007

----
# EXHIBIT 32

Certifications Required
by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies
in his or her capacity as an officer of PennFed Financial Services, Inc. (the
Company) that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial
statements included in such report.

| |  | By: /s/ Joseph L. LaMonica
             
             Joseph L. LaMonica
             President and Chief 
             Executive Officer 
             Date: November 9, 2004
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By: /s/ Claire M. Chadwick
             
             Claire M. Chadwick
             Executive Vice President, 
             Chief Financial Officer and Controller
      
             Date: November 9, 2004
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---