alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1126]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               TRIBUTE TO THE PASSAIC COUNTY DARE PROGRAM

                                 ______

                           HON. MARGE ROUKEMA

                             of new jersey

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, May 24, 1995
  Mrs. ROUKEMA. Mr. Speaker, substance abuse--and the crime it breeds--
is a real and terribly dangerous threat to our communities, our 
neighborhoods and our families. Winning the war on abuse requires 
aggressive interdiction, vigorous enforcement, effective treatment and 
tireless education. No one is more aware of this and no one has worked 
harder to fight the scourge of drug abuse than the men and women of the 
Passaic County Drug Abuse Resistance and Education Program.
  DARE is the largest and most effective drug-abuse prevention and 
education program in the United States and is now taught to 25 million 
youths in school from kindergarten to 12th grade. The DARE curriculum 
was originally developed by the Los Angeles Unified School District. 
Today it is taught by veteran police officers across the country. After 
completing 80 hours of specialized training, the officers enter the 
classroom, where they provide children with the skills and self-esteem 
needed to resist peer pressure and the temptation to use drugs.
  The DARE program is clearly a success. Independent research has 
determined that DARE substantially affects students' attitudes toward 
substance abuse. It has helped students improve study habits, achieve 
higher grades and gain a greater respect for police officers, 
decreasing vandalism and gang activity in the process. I can testify 
that among the police departments and educators in my Congressional 
district, DARE is unanimously singled out for the highest praise.
  On June 11, the Passaic County DARE family will celebrate the program 
by holding a parade. DARE students, police officers, teachers, public 
officials and members of local civic and fraternal organizations from 
16 municipalities will march together to send the message loud and 
clear that we will not tolerate substance abuse in our communities and 
schools.
  Today, I ask my colleagues in the House to join with me by showing 
our appreciation for the dedication of the thousands of DARE volunteers 
in Passaic County who have made a life-and-death difference for 
countless young people in their communities. They make us all proud.

                          ____________________
```
856 A.2d 39

#### In the Matter of Troy M. WOODWARD.

No. 13 DB 2004.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 15, 2004.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2004, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated June 4, 2004, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that TROY M. WOODWARD, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*KAREN PETROSKY

(AC 22256)

Lavery, C. J., and Foti and Peters, Js.

Argued March 25

officially released April 15, 2003

*906Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Gerald John ROUSSEAU v. Rebecca Dufrene BADEAUX and Patricia Badeaux Rousseau.

No. 2011-C-0054.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Rousseau, Gerald John; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Assumption, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 28,992; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 0832.

Denied.
EX-23.1

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-85380, 333-30591 and333-109478) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option Plan/Stock Issuance Plan andthe Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Vista Medical Technologies, Inc. of ourreport dated September 22, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Vista Medical Technologies, Inc. included inAmendment No. 2 to its Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December31, 2003.

 
|                  |   |   |   |   | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|                  |   |   |   |   | Ernst & Young LLP     |   |
|                  |   |   |   |   |                      |   |
| Boston, Massachusetts |   |   |   |   |                      |   |
| September 22, 2004    |   |   |   |   |                      |   |

 

1

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SHAMEKIA S. OCHOA,

Appellant,

v.

EDWARD G. BONDI,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1642

[December 16, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Carlos A. Rodriguez, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 

19-25817 (14).

Morgan L. Weinstein of Twig, Trade, & Tribunal, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, 

for appellant.

David A. Strauss of The Strauss Law Firm, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. D-694.

#### In re Disbarment of Smith.

It is ordered that Moreland G. Smith, Jr., of Dallas, Tex., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated  financial  statements of Grove  Property Trust as of June 30, 1999
and for the six months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000920776
<NAME>                        Grove Property Trust
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              13,045
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    25,771
<PP&E>                                             312,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                      13,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     325,490
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               19,163
<BONDS>                                            199,894
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                85
<OTHER-SE>                                          71,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       325,490
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    31,646
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    21,941
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6,848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,946
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,946
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        226
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         2,172
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .25


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          31,112
<SECURITIES>                                    27,539
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,407
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,811
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,318
<PP&E>                                          22,425
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 124,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,452
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   124,852
<SALES>                                         13,470
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,910
<CGS>                                            1,516
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,603
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   230
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,440
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,146
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,091
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,294
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          9
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-Q FOR THE  PERIOD  ENDED  MARCH  31,  1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                              <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                         3,192
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         2,412
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               4,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    9,575
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         9,575
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           9,575
<LOANS>                                      253,373
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (3,160)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               317,701
<DEPOSITS>                                   198,401
<SHORT-TERM>                                  16,600
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,163
<LONG-TERM>                                   54,414
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          26
<OTHER-SE>                                    46,097
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               317,701
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                4,620
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                765
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 458
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               5,843
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2,369
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,038
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2,437
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     32
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,052
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  710
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       451
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     451
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  3.18
<LOANS-NON>                                    4,052
<LOANS-PAST>                                   4,052
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                1,880
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               3,200
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     87
<RECOVERIES>                                      15
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              3,160
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           3,160
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 3.2(iii)





SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS


OF


SHORE BANCSHARES, INC.





The Amended and Restated By-Laws of Shore Bancshares, Inc., as amended by a First Amendment thereto, are hereby further amended by deleting Section 3 of ARTICLE II in its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:





SECTION 3.  Election and Term of Office.  The Board of Directors shall be divided into classes as described in the Charter.  Each Director shall hold office until the expiration of the term for which the Director is elected, except as otherwise stated in these By-Laws, and thereafter until his or her successor has been elected and qualifies.  If the number of Directors is changed, any increase or decrease shall be apportioned among the classes so as to maintain the number of Directors in each class as nearly equal as possible, and any additional Director of any class shall, subject to Article II, Section 5 of these By-Laws and to any requirements or
restrictions imposed by the Maryland General Corporation Law, hold office for a term that shall coincide with the remaining term of that class, but in no case shall a decrease in the number of Directors shorten the term of any incumbent Director.  Election of Directors need not be by written ballot, unless required by these By-Laws.





Dated:   January 20, 2011
** **

** **

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

                                                                                

**Certification Pursuantto**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

** **

** **

Thiscertification is provided pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2006 of Tripos, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").

** **

The undersigned, theChief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, eachhereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)           the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

(b)           information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.  

                                                                              

 

                                                                                  /s/John P. McAlister

                                                                                JohnP. McAlister

                                                                                ChiefExecutive Officer

                                                                                May15, 2006

                                                                               

                                                                                 /s/B. James Rubin

                                                                                B.James Rubin

                                                                                ChiefFinancial Officer                                                                        

                                                                                May15, 2006

----
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                Certification of
                             Central Coast Bancorp
           pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
                                     2002


      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Central Coast Bancorp, a California corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

1.         The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
           September 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the
           requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
           of 1934, as amended; and

2.         Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.




Dated:     November 7, 2002                    /s/ NICK VENTIMIGLIA
                                               --------------------

                                               Nick Ventimiglia
                                               Chief Executive Officer




Dated:     November 7, 2002                    /s/ ROBERT M. STANBERRY
                                               -----------------------

                                               Robert M. Stanberry
                                               Senior Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.2
 Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.  petroleum consultants
 9601 AMBERGLEN BLVD., SUITE 117
    
    306 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 302
    
    1000 LOUISIANA STREET, SUITE 625AUSTIN, TEXAS 78729-1106
    
    FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102-4987
    
    HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5008512-249-7000
    
    817- 336-2461
    
    713-651-9944www.cgaus.com
  
  Form S-8
 Very truly yours,-s- W. Todd Brooker
    
    (IMAGE)W. Todd Brooker, P.E.
Vice PresidentCawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-693
Fort Worth  Houston  Austin
#### Cheri LABLANCHE, Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, COLLEGE OF MEDICINE; Board of Regents; Medical Council and Executive Committee, Appellees.

No. 00-1479.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 3, 2001.

Filed Jan. 10, 2001.

Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

*575PER CURIAM.

Cheri LaBlanche — an African-American woman and former student at the University of Iowa College of Medicine (College) — filed suit against the College and its Board of Regents, alleging she was wrongfully dismissed from its medical program, in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Iowa Civil Rights Act. The district court1 granted summary judgment in favor of appellees and LaBlanche appeals. We affirm.

Specifically, we agree with the district court that LaBlanche failed to offer any evidence the College’s legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for LaBlanche’s dismissal, failing grades, was a pretext for discrimination. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e); *McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,*411 U.S. 792, 802-04, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); *Fuller v. Rayburn,*161 F.3d 516, 518 (8th Cir.1998); *Montgomery v. John Deere & Co.,*169 F.3d 556, 558 n. 3 (8th Cir.1999) (discrimination claims under Iowa Civil Rights Act analyzed in same manner as federal law counterparts).

LaBlanche also argues the court violated her right to court-appointed counsel, but she was not entitled to appointment of counsel; and in any event, the court repeatedly tried to appoint counsel but La-Blanche failed to cooperate with any of them. *See Stevens v. Redwing,*146 F.3d 538, 546 (8th Cir.1998) (pro se litigant has no statutory or constitutional right to have counsel appointed in civil case). Finally, we do not review LaBlanche’s argument that the College denied her due process, as she raises this issue for the first time on appeal. *See Tarsney v. O’Keefe,*225 F.3d 929, 939 (8th Cir.2000).

Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.