alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANTS CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,368,910
<SECURITIES>                                   289,189
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,177,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,649,542
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,754,147
<PP&E>                                       6,064,667
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,744,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,366,722
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,782,277
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       137,955
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,446,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,366,722
<SALES>                                      5,516,104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,784,746
<CGS>                                        7,520,480
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,520,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,987,552
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,723,286)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,723,286)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,723,286)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.79)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15


                         ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                 REGARDING INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REVIEW REPORT


The Board of Directors
Northfield Laboratories Inc.:

With respect to registration statements of Form S-8 of Northfield Laboratories
Inc., we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated
October 2, 2000 related to our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

/s/ KPMG

Chicago, Illinois
October 11, 2000
#### In re Appeal of Decision of the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 2010-ADMIN-737.

No. 2010-OB-2163.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Boyd Jr., Louis W.;, — Plaintiff; Applying For Appeal of Decision of the Disciplinary Board Office of the Attorney Disciplinary Board, No. 2010-ADMIN-737.

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of RTIN Holdings,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Curtis
A.  Swanson,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Curtis A. Swanson
Curtis A. Swanson
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 19, 2003
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7261 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to permit individuals to select 

a monthly benefit payment date. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2018 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to permit 

individuals to select a monthly benefit payment date. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Benefit 

5 Payments Choice Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PAYMENT DATE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 205 of the Social Security 

8 Act (42 U.S.C. 405) is amended by adding at the end the 

9 following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 7261 IH

1 ‘‘(v)(1) The Commissioner shall permit individuals 

2 entitled to monthly insurance benefits under this title 

3 (other than individuals concurrently entitled to benefits 

4 under this title and title XVI) to select, at the time of 

5 application for monthly insurance benefits or during the 

6 annual, coordinated election period (as defined in section 

7 1851(e)(3)(B)) for any calendar year, any day of the 

8 month as the individual’s monthly payment date. 

9 ‘‘(2) At the time an individual selects a monthly pay10 ment date as described in paragraph (1), the Commis11 sioner shall ensure that the individual is notified of the 

12 effects of such selection, including any effects on the tim13 ing of delivery of benefit payments. 

14 ‘‘(3) After an individual selects a monthly payment 

15 date as described in paragraph (1), the Commissioner 

16 shall send a notice to the individual that provides con17 firmation of the monthly payment date selected, the date 

18 of the selection and the manner in which the selection was 

19 made, and the 1st month for which the selection takes ef20 fect. 

21 ‘‘(4) In any month in which the monthly payment 

22 date selected by an individual as described in paragraph 

23 (1) is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, payment 

24 shall be made— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 7261 IH

1 ‘‘(A) on the 1st day preceding such monthly 

2 payment date that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or 

3 Federal holiday in any case in which such preceding 

4 day occurs during such month; and 

5 ‘‘(B) in any other case, on the 1st day following 

6 such monthly payment date that is not a Saturday, 

7 Sunday, or Federal holiday.’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this section shall take effect 1 year after the date of enact10 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2014-2
Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: MUFG Union Bank, N.A.



Date: June 10, 2016



|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|Paul C. Honda                                        | 
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
|American Honda Finance Corporation                   | 
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |
#### James Patrick WONDER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 4D10-2547.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 11, 2010.

Michael J. Entin and Frank A. Maister, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

No response required for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

James Patrick Wonder, the defendant in a criminal prosecution pending in Broward County Circuit Court, seeks certiorari review of an order denying his request for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of immunity from prosecution pursuant to section 776.032, Florida Statutes (2009) (the “Stand Your Ground” law, enacted by chapter 2005-27, section 5, at 202, Laws of Florida).

We deny the petition, because the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law by following *Velasquez v. State,*9 So.3d 22 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

We certify conflict with *Peterson v. State,*983 So.2d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); *Horn v. State,*17 So.3d 836 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); *State v. Yaqubie,*51 So.3d 474 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); and *Gray v. State,*13 So.3d 114, 115 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). We also certify, as a question of great public importance, the following:

> *697WHETHER SECTION 776.032, FLORIDA STATUTES (2009) (THE “STAND YOUR GROUND” LAW), REQUIRES A TRIAL COURT, UPON MOTION TO DISMISS, TO HOLD AN EVIDEN-TIARY HEARING PRIOR TO TRIAL AND RESOLVE DISPUTED FACTUAL ISSUES TO DETERMINE WHETHER A DEFENDANT HAS ESTABLISHED BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE HIS/ HER ENTITLEMENT TO STATUTORY IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION.

We grant Defendant’s motion for stay and direct the trial court on remand to stay his prosecution pending the resolution of this issue by the Florida Supreme Court in *Dennis v. State,*29 So.3d 290.1

TAYLOR, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

1

. *Dennis*arose from this court’s opinion in *Dennis v. State,*17 So.3d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA), *rev. granted,*29 So.3d 290 (Fla.2009) (holding that "a motion to dismiss based on statutory immunity is properly denied when there are disputed issues of fact.”).
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1557 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1557

                   For the relief of Elvira Arellano.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2007

Mr. Gutierrez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Elvira Arellano.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ELVIRA ARELLANO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for 
purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Elvira Arellano shall 
be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 
status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Elvira Arellano enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), she 
shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, 
notwithstanding any provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 
be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of such Act as 
of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Elvira Arellano, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Elvira 
Arellano shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
(logo) TORCHLIGHTLOAN SERVICES ** ****ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**** **CERTIFICATION J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C20,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through CertificatesSeries 2014-C20 (the “Trust”)  I, Jacob Baron, on behalf of Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as special servicer (the “Certifying Servicer”), certify to J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that: I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities for the fiscal year 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) and the Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects during the Reporting Period.  Date: March 11, 2016  TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC, as Special Servicer By: /s/ Jacob Baron Name: Jacob BaronTitle: Authorized Signatory  475 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10017T 212.883.2800 F 212.883.2560E info@torchlightloanservices.comwww.torchlightinvestors.com
Exhibit 10.7


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PROMISSORY NOTE


 


This
Amendment No. 1 to Promissory Note (this “Agreement”), dated as of October 26, 2021 and effective as of
September 30, 2021, by and between Genesis Growth Tech Acquisition Corp., a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability (the
“Maker”), and Genesis Growth Tech LLC, a Cayman Islands limited liability company (the “Payee”).


 


WHEREAS, Maker executed and delivered a
Promissory Note dated as of May 26, 2021 to Payee in the original principal amount of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) (the “Promissory
Note”); and


 


WHEREAS, Maker and Payee desire to amend
the Promissory Note as set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for other good and valuable
consideration, the Maker and Payee hereby agree as follows:


 


		1.	All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings set forth in the Promissory Note.



 


		2.	Paragraph 1 of the Promissory Note is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:



 


			Principal. The principal balance of this Note shall be payable by the Maker on the earlier
                                                                             of: (i) March 31, 2022 or (ii) the date on which Maker consummates an initial public offering of its securities (the
                                                                             “IPO”). The principal balance may be prepaid at any time. Under no circumstances shall any individual, including but not
                                                                             limited to any officer, director, employee or shareholder of the Maker, be obligated personally for any obligations or liabilities
                                                                             of the Maker hereunder.



 


		3.	Except as specifically modified and amended herein, all other terms, conditions and covenants contained in the Promissory Note shall
remain in full force and effect.



 


		4.	This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Maker and Payee and their respective successors and assigns.



 


		5.	This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to conflict of
law provisions thereof.



 


[signature page
follows]


 




     


    


    


  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker, intending to
be legally bound hereby, has caused this Agreement to be duly executed by the undersigned as of the day and year first above written.


 





	 	Genesis Growth Tech Acquisition Corp.
	 	a Cayman Islands exempted company
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Eyal Perez
	 	Name: 	Eyal Perez
	 	Title:	Director 



 


	Acknowledged and agreed:	 
	 	 	 
	Genesis Growth Tech LLC	 
	a Cayman Islands limited liability company	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Eyal Perez	 
	Name: 	Eyal Perez	 
	Title:	Director
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael S. NELSON.

No. 2011-KO-0180.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2011.

In re Nelson, Michael S.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or *1008Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 458757; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KA 0997.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J., would grant.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melvin LOGAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 99-3325.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Argued Sept. 12, 2000.

Decided Jan. 3, 2001.

*503Before Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, and Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Defendant-appellant Melvin Logan has appealed the district court’s order of August 19, 1999, denying his two motions to withdraw his guilty pleas. Despite his claim on appeal that the facts before the district court were so compelling as to require that this court vacate and set aside his guilty pleas, Logan failed to file a transcript of the hearing on his motions to withdraw his guilty pleas with this court.1

Rather than immediately enforcing the harsh penalty of dismissing his claim for failing to file a transcript, we issued an order on October 19, 2000, stating that Logan had two weeks to obtain a copy of the transcript and provide it to this court. The deadline has passed and Logan has failed to comply with this court’s directive. Because Logan has failed to comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(b)(2) and our order of October 19, 2000 (despite this court giving Logan more than two months to comply), his appeal is

DISMISSED.

1

. In failing to provide this court with a transcript, Logan violated Rule 10(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, which provides: "If the appellant intends to urge on appeal that a finding or conclusion is unsupported by the evidence or is contrary to the evidence, the appellant must include in the record a transcript of all evidence relevant to that finding or conclusion.” A violation of Rule 10(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure is grounds for forfeiture of a claim. *Gramercy Mills, Inc. v. Wolens,*63 F.3d 569, 573-74 (7th Cir. 1995).

* After an examination of the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary, and the appeal is sub-*504milted on the briefs and the record. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f).
627 A.2d 1132

#### BANK OF NEW YORK v. PEOPLE RIDESHARING SYSTEMS.

March 18, 1993.

Petition for certification is granted. The matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division to reconsider the dismissal of the appeal. Counsel fees and other sanctions, monetary and otherwise, may be imposed on the appellant as conditions of a reinstatement.
#### THE STATE v. HITE, Appellant.

Division *Two,*

February 3, 1903.

Ho Exceptions: correct record. Where there is no bill of exceptions and no error in the record proper, the judgment will be affirmed.

Appeal from Henry Circuit Court. — Now. *G. V. Berry,*Special Judge.

Affirmed.

*Peyton A. Parks*and *G. G. Dickinson*for appellant.

*Edward G. Crow,*Attorney-General, for the State.

GANTT, P. J.

An indictment was preferred at the January term, 1901, of the circuit court of Henry county against the defendant for defiling a female under the age of eighteen years who was at the time confined to his care and protection. The defendant was duly arraigned, and pleaded not guilty. He was tried at the September term, 1901, and the jury found him guilty, and after his motions for new trial and in arrest were overruled, he was duly sentenced in accordance with the verdict. He obtained leave to file a bill of exceptions at the January term, 1902, but failed to avail himself of that'privilege, and accordingly there is nothing before us save the record proper, in which we find no error whatever, and the judgment and sentence of the circuit court is therefore affirmed.

All concur.
#### Andre J. ROBERT, Randall G. Mourot, J. Storey Charbonnet, and Marketfare, L.L.C. v. ROBERT MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC, Claiborne Fresh Market, LLC, Harrison Fresh Market, LLC, Marc L. Robert, II, Darlene P. Robert, Cecilia Poche Bono and Josephine L. Poche.

No. 2011-CC-1108.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Claiborne Fresh Market LLC; Harrison Fresh Market LLC; Marketfare LLC; Robert II, Marc L.; Robert Management Company LLC; Robert, Darlene P.; — Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. L, No. 2010^4150; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-C-0003.

Denied.