alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 10-KSB

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Cecil A.  Brooks  does  hereby  certify  that the Annual  Report of  Cornerstone
Ministries Investments, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005
(the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as  applicable,  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and the  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 27, 2006.
/s/ Cecil A. Brooks, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
--------------------

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

John T.  Ottinger,  does hereby  certify that the Annual  Report of  Cornerstone
Ministries Investments, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005
(the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as  applicable,  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and the  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 27, 2006.
/s/  John T.  Ottinger,  Vice  President,  Chief  Operating  Officer  and  Chief
-----------------------
Financial Officer


                                       31
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                             654
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                       153
<INVENTORY>                                     20,296
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,999
<PP&E>                                          10,275
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,915
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,222
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,107
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,731
<CGS>                                           17,482
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,779
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,567
<INCOME-TAX>                                       615
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                952
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       952
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### L. P. Terrell v. C. M. Barrack et al.

(No. 3354.)

May 6, 1885.

Appeal from Wise County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 667. *Usury; cannot be pleaded by sureties, when; case stated.*B. executed his note to T. for $500 borrowed money, O. and D. signing said note as sureties. T. sued upon the note. C. and D. pleaded that they were sureties only; that the note was usurious; that B., at the time of executing said note, agreed and promised to pay T. three per cent, per month for the use of said money; that this agreement was unknown to them at the time they signed the note as sureties for B., etc. The note upon its face stipulated for ten per cent, per annum interest. *Held,*it is well settled that an agreement by the principal to pay usurious interest will not discharge a surety. Such a promise being in law void, does not constitute a valuable consideration. An agreement by a creditor with a debtor to extend the time of the collection of a debt in consideration of usury, without the knowledge or consent of the surety, will not discharge the latter. [W. & W. Con. Rep. § 185; Burke v. Cruger, 8 Tex. 67; Payne v. Powell, 14 Tex. 600; Claiborne v. Birge, 42 Tex. 98.] It was not stipulated in the note, directly or indirectly, that B. should pay usury. The rate of interest stipulated for was legal, and the usurious agreement pleaded was independent of the note, and could have no legal effect upon the liability of the sureties. [R. S. art. 2979.]

Reversed and rendered.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Targeted Genetics Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities & Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
      J. Poston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)          The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)          The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:        May
                  7, 2008
            
            /s/
              David J. PostonDavid
                J. Poston
              Vice
                President, Finance and Chief Financial
                Officer
#### The Township of Hiawatha v. Joseph H. Steere, Circuit Judge of Schoolcraft County.

*Equity practice*— Amending *decree*— Mandamus.

*Mandamus*will not lie to vacate an order made by the circuit court in chancery amending an enrolled decree dismissing a bill so as to make such dismissal without prejudice, and the decree conform to the oral announcement of the court.

*Mandamus.*

Argued February 9, 1892.

Denied February 10, 1892.

Eelator applied for a writ of *mandamus*to vacate an order amending an enrolled decree. The facts are stated in the opinion.

*W. F.*Riggs, for relator.

*J. F. Carey,*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

In this matter a decree was orally announced dismissing a bill without prejudice.2 The *271■decree was drawn, signed, and enrolled, omitting the words “without prejudice.” The court afterwards made an order, on motion, amending the decree to conform to his oral announcement. This application is for *mandamus*to vacate this order.

The writ is denied.

2

 The bill was filed by the township of Harrison, the territory comprising'which was formerly embraced within that of relator, for an accounting and settlement under the statute, and was dismissed upon general demurrer by the relator.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TECHFORCE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET MARCH 31, 1997 (IN
THOUSANDS) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             702
<SECURITIES>                                     5,336
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,231
<ALLOWANCES>                                       676
<INVENTORY>                                      4,129
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,224
<PP&E>                                          19,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,482
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,879
<BONDS>                                          3,213
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,024
<SALES>                                          7,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,661
<CGS>                                            5,488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,761
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   676
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,509
<INCOME-TAX>                                       549
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,550
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       960
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Media, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John D. Orlando, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

            (3) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

            (4) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


                                                /s/ John D. Orlando
                                                -----------------------------
                                                Chief Financial Officer

  November 14, 2002
#### William BRYANT, Petitioner, v. SHANNON-POCAHONTAS MINING COMPANY; West Virginia Coal Workers’ Pneumoconiosis Fund; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents.

No. 00-2062.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 12, 2000.

Decided Jan. 5, 2001.

William Bryant, petitioner pro se. William T. Brotherton, III, Spilman, Thomas *&*Battle, P.L.L.C., Charleston, WV; Patricia May Nece, Barry H. Joyner, United States Department of Labor, Washington, DC, for respondents.

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

William Bryant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. *See Bryant v. DOWCP,*No. 99-1028-BLA (BRB June 30, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### G., C. & S. F. R’y Co. v. P. F. Connerty.

(No. 3014.)

Appeal from Dallas Oounty.

*{Transferred from Austin.)*

J. W. Terry and Alexander & Clark, counsel for appellant.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 207. *Appeal from justice’s court; motion to dismiss, must be made when; case stated.*Judgment was rendered in justice’s court May 15, 1889. Appeal taken to the county court, and transcript and original papers filed in county court on 23d August, 1889. On September 30, 1889, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in the county court because, the transcript not having been filed by the first day of the second term of the county court after the appeal was perfected, the county court had no jurisdiction. Appellant asked that said motion be overruled, because the same was not made in the time required by law, and the irregularity alleged in said motion was thereby waived; that the transcript and papers were filed in the county court during said second term, while the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss was not filed until thirty-five days after the beginning.of the third term of' court; that, furthermore, plaintiff, having appeared in court, and continued this cause after said transcript was filed in the county court, by such appearance waived any right he might have had to dismiss the same on account of the irregularity complained of. The court sustained plaintiff’s motion and dismissed the appeal in the county court, from which judgment appellant prosecutes this appeal. The court erred in sustaining plaintiff’s motion dismissing the appeal. “When the transcript and papers from the justice’s court are not filed in the county *311court on or before the first day of the second term of the county court after the appeal is perfected, the appellee should then move to dismiss the appeal upon the said ground, and such motion should be granted; but such motion must be made at the second term of the court or it will be considered as waived, in case, the papers and transcript have in the meantime been filed. Such ground, being a mere irregularity, to be made available must be taken advantage of at the first opportunity.” [3 Civil Ca§. Ct. App., § 284.]

January 31, 1891.

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 3.2

                          ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO THE

                          ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF

                          SUNBURST ACQUISITIONS I, INC.



         Pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado  Business  Corporation  Act,
the undersigned  Corporation  adopts the following  Articles of Amendment to its
Articles of Incorporation:

         FIRST:  The name of the Corporation is Sunburst Acquisitions I, Inc.

         SECOND:  The following amendment  was adopted by the Board of Directors
and  Shareholders  of the  Corporation in the manner  prescribed by the Colorado
Business Corporation Act on February 22, 1999:

         ARTICLE I - THE NAME OF THE CORPORATION  shall be amended to change the
name of the corporation to Invu, Inc. and to read as follows:

                  "The name of the corporation is Invu, Inc."

         THIRD:   The number of  shares voted for  the amendment was  sufficient
for approval.

         FOURTH:  The manner, if not set  forth in such  amendment, in which any
exchange, reclassification, or cancellation of issued shares provided for in the
amendment shall be effected, is as follows: Not applicable.

         FIFTH:   The amendment does not affect a change in the amount of stated
capital.



                                        1

<PAGE>


         DATED:   February 22, 1999

                                             SUNBURST ACQUISITIONS I, INC.



                                             By:      /s/ David Morgan
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      David Morgan, President

ATTEST:


By:       /s/
          -----------------------------
Name:
          -----------------------------
Title:
          -----------------------------




                                        2
**Exhibit 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(File Nos. 333-56961, 333-70137, 333-135073 and 333-135028), and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-116390,333-131881, 333-136150 and 333-142790) ofBrigham Exploration Company of our report dated February 27, 2006 relating to the consolidatedstatements of operations, of stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for the year ended December 31,2005, which appears in this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPHouston, Texas
**Exhibit      21**

| **Name**                                              |   | **Jurisdiction                of Organization** |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |   |                                            |
| Learning                Curve International, Inc.     |   | Delaware                                        |
| RC2                (H.K.) Limited                     |   | Hong                Kong                        |
| Learning                Curve Brands, Inc. (2)        |   | Delaware                                        |
| The                First Years Inc.                   |   | Massachusetts                                   |
| The                First Years Inc.                   |   | Delaware                                        |
| DiecastExpress.com,                Inc.               |   | Delaware                                        |
| Racing                Champions Worldwide Limited     |   | United                Kingdom                   |
| Racing                Champions International Limited |   | United                Kingdom                   |
| Bondco                988 Limited                     |   | United                Kingdom                   |
| Acre                689 Limited                       |   | United                Kingdom                   |
| RC2                Deutschland GmbH                   |   | Germany                                         |
| Learning                Curve Canada Holdco, Inc.     |   | Delaware                                        |
| RC2                Canada Corporation                 |   | Nova                Scotia, Canada              |
| RC2                Australia Pty. Ltd.                |   | Australia                                       |
| LCI                (H.K.) Limited                     |   | Hong                Kong                        |
| RCE                Holdings, LLC                      |   | Delaware                                        |
| RC2                (Asia) Limited                     |   | Hong                Kong                        |
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Targeted
Genetics Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March
31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, H. Stewart Parker, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

April 28, 2004                                            /s/ H. Stewart Parker
-----------------------                                  ----------------------
Date                                                     H. Stewart Parker
                                                         President and
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Targeted
Genetics Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March
31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Todd E. Simpson, Vice President, Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

April 28, 2004                       /s/ Todd E. Simpson
--------------                      -------------------------------------------
Date                                Todd E. Simpson
                                    Vice President, Finance and Administration,
                                    Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
                                    Treasurer
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MITY Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Bradley T Nielson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date: October 29, 2003                  /s/ Bradley T Nielson
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Bradley T Nielson
                                        Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or any
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.