alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
South Jersey Gas Company (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David A. Kindlick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ David A. Kindlick
-------------------------------------
Name: David A. Kindlick
Title: Chief Financial Officer
March 7, 2005
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1652 

To amend the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention 

Act to authorize the Federal Trade Commission to issue new rules 

to establish a requirement to prohibit any telemarketing calls during 

the hours of 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2007 

Mr. KING of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and 

Abuse Prevention Act to authorize the Federal Trade 

Commission to issue new rules to establish a requirement 

to prohibit any telemarketing calls during the hours of 

5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protection From Tele5 marketers Act’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1652 IH

1 SEC. 2. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RULES. 

2 Section 3(a) of the Telemarketing and Consumer 

3 Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act (15 U.S.C. 6102) is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(4) The Commission shall include in such 

6 rules respecting other abusive telemarketing acts or 

7 practices a requirement that telemarketers shall not 

8 initiate any outbound telephone calls to any person 

9 during the hours of 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. in the 

10 locality of the person called.’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
The Board of DirectorsPSS
World Medical, Inc.

Re:    Registration Statement File
Nos. 33-80657, 33-90464, 333-15043, 333-64185, 33-85004, 33-97756, 33-99046,
33-97754, 333-30427, 333-50526, and 333-58272 on Form S-8

With respect to the subject
registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report
dated February 10, 2004 related to our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the
Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registration
statement prepared or certified by an accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an
accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

KPMG LLP

Jacksonville, FL February 10, 2004
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
               RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


         I, George B. Lemmon, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) of the Company
certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q; and

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q.

/s/ George B. Lemmon, Jr.
-------------------------
George B. Lemmon, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

September 10, 2002






                                       D-1
EXHIBIT
32





Certification
of Periodic Report


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to, and for purposes only of,
18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned hereby certify that (i) the Annual Report of
Shore Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and (ii) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Shore
Bancshares, Inc.





Date:
                      March
      13, 2009
                      /s/
      W. Moorhead VermilyeW.
      Moorhead VermilyePresident/Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
                      March
      13, 2009
                      /s/
      Susan E. LeavertonSusan
      E. Leaverton, CPATreasurer/Principal
      Accounting
Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS


         As independent petroleum consultants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-56961) of Brigham Exploration Company and in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-70137) of Brigham Exploration Company of our estimates of
reserves, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to all references to
our firm included in this Annual Report.



/s/ Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.

CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.


Fort Worth, Texas
March 26, 1999
Order entered January 31, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05 - 22 - 00043 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.C., A CHILD On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JC - 20 - 00975 - X

O RDER This is an accelerated appeal in a child protect ion case . The clerk’s record has been filed; the reporter’s record is overdue. The clerk’s record reflects the trial court found Mother and Fathe r to be indigent and appointed trial counsel for each of t he m . The record further reflects trial counsel was “released” from this case when the final decree was signed. While appellate counsel has been appointed for Mother, nothing before the Court refle cts Fa ther, who is presumed to remain indigent through any appeals absent changed circumstances, has been appointed appellate counsel. See In re P.M. , 520 S.W.3d 24, 26 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam) (citation omitted).Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court t o appoint counsel to represent

Father on appeal and to transmit to this Court, no later than February 4 , 20 22 , a supplemental clerk’s record containing the order appointing counsel. We note that on January 28, 2022, Mother filed written verification that she ha d requested the reporter’s record . Accordingly, we ORDER Pamela Sumler, Official Court Reporter for the 305th Judicial District Court, to file the record no later than February 7 , 2022 . To ensure the timely filing of the record, the trial
court mu st arrange for a substitute reporter if necessary. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 28.4 ( b ) (1)

. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Cheryl Lee Shannon , Presiding Judge of the 3 05th Judicial District Court; Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre; Ms. Sumler; and, all parties. We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court an opportunity to comply with this order. It shall be reinstated no later than February 9, 2022

. /s/ CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE
#### Paxton MORGAN, Mitchell Davis, Richard Davidson, Chris Thedford, Chad Burden, Billy G. Lewis, and Robert W. Taggart v. CITY OF SHREVEPORT.

No. 2011-C-1929.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

In re Davidson, Richard; Lewis, Billy G.; Morgan, Paxton; Thedford, Chris;— Plaintiffs); Applying For Writ of Certio-rari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 516,307; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,362-CA.

Denied.
#### Gustavo CASTILLO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D10-2989.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 9, 2011.

Gustavo Castillo, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, WELLS, and SUAREZ, JJ.

WELLS, Judge.

Gustavo Castillo appeals an order summarily denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the postconviction record, *see*Fla. R App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

The excerpt of the Rule 3.800 hearing transcripts provided to this Court reflect that the court below denied the instant motion as successive based upon a prior order denying the defendant’s claim that he was improperly classified as a habitual felony offender. However, the lower court failed to attach to the instant order under review either Castillo’s prior Rule 3.800 motion or the prior order denying the motion. Therefore, because the record now before us fails to make the required showing that the defendant is entitled to no relief, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. . If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the court shall attach the record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Targeted Genetics Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities & Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, H.
      Stewart Parker., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)          The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)          The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
              H.
              Stewart ParkerH.
                Stewart Parker
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer
              May
                9, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




This
      certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      as
      Exhibit 32 to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and in accordance
      with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K. This certification is not being
“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      and is not and should not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into the
      Form 10-Q or any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Tothe Board of Directors of

SenescoTechnologies, Inc.

 

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Numbers 333-140238and 333-104105 on Form S-8 and Registration Numbers 333-146691 and333-138405 of our report dated September 26, 2007 on the consolidatedfinancial statements of Senesco Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiary as of June 30,2007 and for each of the two fiscal years for the period then ended, appearingin this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008.  Our report dated September 26, 2007relating to the consolidated financial statements includes an emphasisparagraph relating to an uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue asa going concern.

 

 

**/s/ GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP**

NewYork, New York

 

September 26,2008

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTH
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             928
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,356
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,541
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,007
<PP&E>                                          33,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,047
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           160
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,063
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               167,861
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   180
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,484
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,870
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,614
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,614
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            7232
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1033
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  8265
<PP&E>                                          248679
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  333659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           249071
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           850
<OTHER-SE>                                       83738
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    333659
<SALES>                                           5440
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5440
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1034464
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (1037626)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8602
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1037626)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1037626)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.140)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1676 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 152
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1676

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2007

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

                              May 17, 2007

                Reported by Mr. Dodd, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To reauthorize the program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
          Development for loan guarantees for Indian housing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Native American Home Ownership 
Opportunity Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. LOAN GUARANTEES FOR NATIVE AMERICAN HOUSING.

    Section 184(i) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 
(12 U.S.C. 1715z-13a(i)) is amended as follows:
            (1) Outstanding aggregate limitation.--In paragraph (5)(C), 
        by striking ``fiscal years 1997 through 2007'' and inserting 
        ``fiscal years 2008 through 2012''.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--In paragraph (7), by 
        striking ``fiscal years 1997 through 2007'' and inserting 
        ``fiscal years 2008 through 2012''.
                                                       Calendar No. 152

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1676

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To reauthorize the program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
          Development for loan guarantees for Indian housing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 17, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY and Agricultural and Mechanical College v. PFD THREE, L.L.C., et al.

No. 2011-CC-0745.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2011.

In re Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. C, No. 2010-7986; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-0-141.

Denied.
#### LUBAVITCH OF IOWA, INC., and Moishe B. Kasowitz, Appellants, v. Jack B. WALTERS, Director of General Services of the State of Iowa, and The State of Iowa, Appellees.

No. 86-2580SI.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 24, 1986.

Decided Dec. 24, 1986.

*657Before ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The order of the District Court, denying plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, is affirmed. We find no abuse of discretion in the District Court’s action. We agree with that court that the constitutionality of the Christmas tree in the rotunda of the state capitol is not before us. In addition, on the present sketchy state of this record, we know too little about the total context in which the tree is placed, or any display that may surround it.

Affirmed.

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge,

dissenting.

A Christmas tree owned by the State of Iowa has been erected in the rotunda of the state capitol. Another Christmas tree, also owned by the state, has been erected on the capitol grounds. The ornaments on the tree in the rotunda of the state capitol include angels. The state is obligated to treat all religions evenhandedly. Allowing the placement of these Christmas trees, while at the same time denying permission for the Menorah, appears to be a discrimination against the Jewish religion. So long as Christian symbols are permitted, other religions should be given equal treatment. I would therefore grant the relief sought by plaintiffs-appellants, leaving, however, to the state the option of removing any unattended Christmas trees from the state capitol and its grounds, in which event the state would be free not to allow an unattended Menorah on the capitol grounds.
#### Arthur Worley v. Tom Hudson.

(No. 1536.)

October 27, 1883.

Appeal from Brazos County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 26. *Appeal bond from justice's court; conditions of, etc.*The appeal bond in this case is conditioned “that the said A. Worley shall prosecute his appeal, to effect, *or*shall pay off and *satisfied*any judgment or decree that may be rendered against A. Worley, the appellant *in this suit.” Held,*that this was a sufficient appeal bond, and that the county court erred in dismissing the appeal because of supposed defects in said bond. It did not vitiate the bond to use the word “or’’instead of the word “and” before the words “ shall pay,” etc. [Robinson v. Brinson, 20 Tex. 438; W. & W. Con. Rep. § 846.] That the words “satisfied any judgment,” etc., are used instead of the words “satisfy any judgment,” etc., and that it uses the words “ in this suit ” instead of “on such appeal,” are objections which are deemed not substantial. It is settled that the defects in an appeal bond which will defeat the jurisdiction of the court must be substantial and vital. [Zapp v. Michaelis, 56 Tex. 395.]

Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant



Parent
------

FirstBank Corp.

                                            Percentage       Jurisdiction or
Subsidiaries                               of Ownership   State of Incorporation
------------                               ------------   ----------------------

FirstBank Northwest (1),                       100%             Washington
with its subsidiaries:
Tri-Star Financial Corporation  (1)            100%             Idaho
Pioneer Development Corporation (2)            100%             Oregon
Pioneer Bank Investment Corporation (2)        100%             Oregon


The operations of the Registrant's subsidiaries are included in the
Registrant's consolidated financial statements.

(1)   These subsidiaries were acquired by the parent effective July 1, 1997.
(2)   These subsidiaries were acquired by the parent effective October 31, 2003.