alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
      FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
      1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                   352
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          6,396
<ALLOWANCES>                                             946
<INVENTORY>                                            1,850
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      10,475
<PP&E>                                                10,029 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0 <F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        43,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 10,168
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                 164
<OTHER-SE>                                             6,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          43,347
<SALES>                                                  623
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      23,195
<CGS>                                                    766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         25,602
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     2,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (5,834)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (5,834)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (5,834)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.43)


<FN>
<F1>  Fixed assets are reported net of accumulated depreciation in the balance
      sheet
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Tywann O. CARTER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D12-2221.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 19, 2012.

*1273Tywann 0. Carter, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is granted. As in the case of petitioner’s co-defendant, upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall be furnished to the clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal directed to petitioner’s judgment and sentence in Escambia County Circuit Court case number 2008-CF-004267-A. If petitioner qualifies for the appointment of counsel at public expense, the lower tribunal is directed to appoint counsel to represent him on appeal. Jenkins v. State, 75 So.3d 1288, 1290 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). The two issues on appeal shall be limited to the same two issues authorized in Jenkins. See Id.

CLARK, MARSTILLER, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Steve Malin, Principle Executive Officer of A.B.Watley Group Inc., hereby
certify that the Form 10-K of A.B.Watley Group Inc., for the period ended
September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of A.B.Watley Group Inc.,

                                     /s/   Steve Malin
                                     ------------------------
                                     Name: Steve Malin
                                     Date: May 19, 2004

These certifications are being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, shall not be deemed to be filed as part of the periodic
report described herein nor shall they be deemed filed by A.B. Watley Group Inc.
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of the written statements required by Section 906 has been
provided to A.B.Watley Group Inc. and will be retained by A.B.Watley Group Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northfield Laboratories Inc.
on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jack J. Kogut,
Chief Financial Officer of Northfield Laboratories Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of Northfield Laboratories Inc.


Date: January 14, 2003


/s/ JACK J. KOGUT
-----------------
Jack J. Kogut
Chief Financial Officer
#### In re Ramsey T. MARCELLO.

No. 2011-OB-1539.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 15, 2011.

ORDER

|, Considering the original and supplemental Motion to Revoke Conditional Admission filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and the response to each filed by respondent,

IT IS ORDERED that respondent, Ramsey T. Marcello, Louisiana Bar Roll number 32977, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, §§ 25.1(1) and 19.2. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for a hearing pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 25.1(2). The hearing shall be conducted on an expedited basis, at which time respondent shall be required to show by clear and convincing evidence why his conditional admission should not be permanently revoked. The hearing committee shall file its report and recommendation in this court no later than thirty days from the conclusion of the hearing.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Jeannette T. Knoll

/s/ Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana
627 A.2d 1128

#### JUDITH O’HEA, WIDOW OF RONALD O’HEA v. EXXON COMPANY, USA.

March 29, 1993.

ORDER

ORDERED that the within appeal be and hereby is dismissed.
Exhibit 23.1

LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-112947 and No. 333-155370) and Form S-3 (No. 333-139895) of Bay
Banks of Virginia, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report, dated March 17, 2009, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, included in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bay Banks of Virginia,
Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2008.

LOGO

Winchester, Virginia

March 24, 2009



56
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) of TF Financial Corporation(the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, we, Kent C. Lufkin, President and Chief Executive Officer, andDennis R. Stewart, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial position and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
|   |                  |   | /s/ Kent C. Lufkin                                   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  | August 14,  2008 |   | Kent C. Lufkin                                       |
|   |                  |   | President and CEO                                    |
|   |                  |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|   |                  |   |                                                 |
|   |                  |   |                                                 |
|   |                  |   | /s/ Dennis R. Stewart                                |
| Date:  | August 14, 2008  |   | Dennis R. Stewart                                    |
|   |                  |   | Executive Vice President and                         |
|   |                  |   | Chief Financial Officer                              |
|   |                  |   | (Principal Financial & Accounting  Officer) |

 

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lester WILLIAMS.

No. 2011-KO-1371.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Williams, Lester; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Iberia, 16th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 06-651; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-1398.

Denied.
#### Package Delivery, Inc. *v.*Indiana Employment Security Board et al.

[No. 19,846.

Filed January 31, 1963.]

*255
      *Ben F. Hatfield Jr.,*and *Coates, Hatfield & Cal-kins,*of Indianapolis, for appellant.

*Edwin K. Steers,*Attorney General, and *Keith Campbell,*Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.

Cooper, C. J.

The matter now before us is for a judicial review of proceedings from the findings and decision of a Liability Referee for the Indiana Employment Security Board.

The assigned error is, “That the decision of the Liability Referee is contrary to law.”

The facts are not in dispute, having been stipulated by the parties hereto. It is conceded by both parties that this appeal concerns the judicial interpretation of two sections of the Indiana Employment Security Act and the only question for our determination is, can the appellee board and/or liability referee properly deny appellant herein a merit rate consideration under the provisions of Requirement (C) of §1102 of the Employment Security Act (Predecessor’s delinquent account), where appellant had notified the Board of its intent to purchase the assets of the predecessor five days prior to the purchase, in compliance with the notice requirements of §3323 of the Act? See §52-1557v, Burns’ 1962 Suppl.

The Liability Referee held that the Board was correct in denying appellant a merit rate consideration under the provisions of the requirement (C) of §1102 where the delinquency of the predecessor had not been paid. Sec. 52-1535a, Burns’, 1962 Suppl.

*256Finding no prior authorities on these points, we reviewed the entire Employment Security Act, together with the stipulated facts; therefore, we are of the opinion that the Liability Referee reached the right decision under the present existing law. The involved statutes are clear and are unambiguous, and we cannot, by judicial fiat, change or amend or complement a valid statute. Such is solely a legislative function.

By reason of what we have heretofore stated, the decision of the Liability Referee is affirmed.

Carson, Clements, Ryan, JJ., concur.

Note. — Reported in 187 N. E. 2d 488.
#### STATE ex rel. Tyrone D. INGRAM v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-OK-2413.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Ingram, Tyrone D.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 422,169; to thé Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2004 KA 1602.

Denied. Because relator has previously exhausted direct review of his conviction and sentence in the court of appeal and in this Court, he must first file any additional claims for relief in a application for post-conviction relief directed to the court in which he was convicted, La.C.Cr.P. art. 926, subject to the time limits imposed by La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8.
#### Thomas M. ANGLE v. Preston E. RHOADES and Daisy A. Rhoades, Individually, Jointly and Severally, Appellants. Myrtle ANGLE v. Preston E. RHOADES and Daisy A. Rhoades, Individually, Jointly and Severally, Appellants v. Thomas M. ANGLE, Third Party Defendant.

Nos. 13157, 13158.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 6, 1960.

Decided May 12, 1960.

Bernard Quinn, Erie, Pa. (Quinn, Leemhuis, Plate & Dwyer, Erie, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

John G. Gent, William W. Knox, Erie, Pa. (Curtze & Gent, Erie, Pa., Harry F. Fleming, Detroit, Mich., Knox, Weber, *926Pearson & McLaughlin, Erie, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and FORMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Our examination of the record in this case discloses evidence sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict. We find no error in the conduct of the trial or the District Court’s instructions to the jury.

The Order of the District Court will be affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24791]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Meeting of the ACRS 
Subcommittee on Future Plant Designs; Revision to the September 24, 
2010, ACRS Meeting Federal Register Notice

    The Federal Register Notice for the ACRS Subcommittee Meeting on 
Future Plant Designs scheduled to be held on October 21, 2010, is being 
revised to notify the following:
    The meeting will be open to public attendance with exception of 
portions that may be closed to protect information that is proprietary 
to Westinghouse Electric Company, General Electric--Hitachi Nuclear 
Energy (GEH), and their contractors, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4).
    The notice of this meeting was previously published in the Federal 
Register on Friday, September 24, 2010, [75 FR 58448]. All other items 
remain the same as previously published.
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting Christina Antonescu, Designated Federal Official (Telephone: 
301-415-6792, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f6b59e849f85829f9897d8b79882999893859583b6988495d8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="15567d677c66617c7b743b547b617a7b70667660557b67763b727a63">[email protected]</span></a>) between 7:30 a.m. 
and 5:15 p.m. (ET).

    Dated: September 28, 2010.
Antonio F. Dias,
Chief, Reactor Safety Branch B, Advisory Committee on Reactor 
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2010-24791 Filed 10-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7132 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7132

To permit aliens who lawfully enter the United States on valid visas as 
nonimmigrant elementary and secondary school students to attend public 
  schools in the United States for longer than 1 year if such aliens 
reimburse the local educational agency that administers the school for 
 the full, unsubsidized per capita cost of providing education at such 
            school for the period of the alien's attendance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2018

  Mr. Welch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit aliens who lawfully enter the United States on valid visas as 
nonimmigrant elementary and secondary school students to attend public 
  schools in the United States for longer than 1 year if such aliens 
reimburse the local educational agency that administers the school for 
 the full, unsubsidized per capita cost of providing education at such 
            school for the period of the alien's attendance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening America's Public 
Schools Through Promoting Foreign Investment Act''.

SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS.

    Section 214(m)(1)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1184(m)(1)(B)) is amended by striking ``unless--'' and all that 
follows through ``(ii)'' and inserting ``unless''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE ex rel. David WILLIAMS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0648.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

In re Williams, David; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. C, Nos. 12-93-0357, 12-93-0358; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 2248.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. Cf. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D).
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles REED. In re Stuart Weg.

No. 2011-OK-2640.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 30, 2011.

In re Weg, Stuart; — Other; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. E, No. 499-646; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1458.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,268,229
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         159,003,427
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,007,706
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     58,951,384
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          58,002,141
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            58,951,384
<LOANS>                                        114,578,525
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,011,935
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,203,712
<DEPOSITS>                                     178,855,077
<SHORT-TERM>                                             0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                840,495
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         5,823,640
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,684,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  20,508,140
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,522,678
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,176,277
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   796,291
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,495,246
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,054,088
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,065,271
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,429,975
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      208,367
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 204,853
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,487,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,488,092
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,488,092
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,930,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.64
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        7.30
<LOANS-NON>                                         78,563
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,069,057
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   860,709
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       76,759
<RECOVERIES>                                        19,618
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,011,935
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,011,935
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RONALD D. THOMPSON,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-1558

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed July 19, 2016

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit 

Court for St. Johns County, 

J. Michael Traynor, Judge.

Ronald D. Thompson, Lake Butler, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). 

PALMER, ORFINGER, and EVANDER, J.J., concur.
#### Marsha COLBY v. STATE of Alabama.

CR-06-2183.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Dec. 18, 2009.

John W. Beck, Fairhope; and Rebecca Kiley, Charlotte Morrison, and Bryan A. Stevenson, Montgomery, for appellant.

Troy King, atty. gen., and Marc S. Bass, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.

*On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court*

WELCH, Judge.

On the authority of *Ex parte Colby,*41 So.3d 1 (Ala.2009), we reverse the judgment of the circuit court and remand this cause to the Baldwin Circuit Court for proceedings consistent with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

WISE, P.J., and WINDOM, KELLUM, and MAIN, JJ., concur.