alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                WRITTEN STATEMENT
  OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned President and
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Noble International
Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge the
Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                    By:          /s/ Christopher L. Morin
                       --------------------------------------------------
                    Name: Christopher L. Morin
                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
                    Executive Officer) of Noble International, Ltd.

                    By:        /s/ Jay J. Hansen
                       --------------------------------------------------
                    Name: Jay J. Hansen
                    Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
                    of Noble International, Ltd.
#### J. W. Barnett v. M. V. Abernathy.

(No. 3375.)

June 20, 1885.

Appeal from Nolan County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 775. *Conclusions' of judge; failure to file, cause for reversal, when; case stated.*This suit was tried by the judge without a jury, and judgment was rendered against appellant, who was the defendant in the court below. Two days after the rendition of judgment, appellant requested the judge to state in writing his conclusions of fact and law and file the same in the cause, in accordance with article 1333, Revised Statutes. This request the judge failed to comply with, for what reason is not disclosed by the record. The term of the court did not adjourn for several days after the request was made. There is no statement of facts in the record. *Held:*It was the duty of the judge to give appellant the benefit of the statement requested. The law entitled him to it, if requested within a reasonable time after the trial, and if no good reason existed for not granting it. In the absence of anything to the contrary, we think the request, in this instance, was made within a reasonable time, and no excuse whatever appears for not complying with it. As far as we can judge from the record, appellant, without fault on his part, has been deprived of an important legal right, the only remedy for which deprivation is to set aside the judgment and remand the cause for a new trial. *[Ante,*§ 221; City Nat. Bank v. Stout, 61 Tex. 571.]

Reversed and remanded.
(logo) Long Beach Mortgage
                                             Company

January 12, 1997

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1996, Long Beach Mortgage  Company has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  UNIFORM  SINGLE  ATTESTATION
PROGRAM  FOR  MORTGAGE  BANKERS.  As of and for this  same  period,  Long  Beach
Mortgage  Company  had in effect a fidelity  bond in the amount of $ 1 0,000,000
and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $3,500,000.


/s/ Patricia L. Wayman                       /s/ Sheridan Brooks
Patricia Wayman                              Sheridan Brooks
President                                    Controller
Servicing Division





1068 TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD, ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92868 (714) 543-5262
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Margaret E. Nicotra, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[774 NYS2d 459]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 10, 2003, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed. The record establishes that although claimant was not an active participant in her husband’s home construction business, she was listed as vice-president and treasurer, 50% corporate shareholder and was a signatory on the corporation’s bank account. In addition, during her claimed period of unemployment “shareholder distribution” checks in the sum of $200 each were issued to her every week from the corporation. These checks were endorsed by claimant’s husband using claimant’s name and deposited in their joint account. Under these circumstances, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision that the alleged weekly shareholder dividends actually constituted remuneration for claimant’s status as a corporate officer *(see Matter of Sierpinski [Commissioner of Labor],*308 AD2d 668, 669 [2003]). Furthermore, given claimant’s failure to disclose her status as a corporate officer, a fact of which she was aware, we are unable to disturb the Board’s finding that claimant made willful false statements *(see*
      *910
      *Matter of Jeffery [Commissioner of Labor],*279 AD2d 685, 686 [2001]; *Matter of Gross [Hudacs],*195 AD2d 742 [1993]).

Cardona, EJ., Mercure, Spain, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
#### Joey JAMES v. STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE & FISHERIES.

No. 2011-C-0095.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re James, Joey; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 2008-2514; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-399.

Granted. The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the judgment of the district court is reinstated. *See Fulmer v. Department of Wildlife & Fisheries,*10-2779 (La.7/1/11), 68 So.3d 499.
#### STATE ex rel. Kendrelle BROWN v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1228.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re Brown, Kendrelle; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 469-700; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-0559.

Denied.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**The following certification isfurnished pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and ExchangeCommission and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability ofthat section.  Such certification shallnot be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securitiesact of 1933 or the Securities Exchange act of 1934, except to the extent thatsuch certification is specifically incorporated by reference by the registrant.**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Metro One Telecommunications, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,Timothy A. Timmins, Chief Executive Officer and Dale N. Wahl, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | November 14, 2003 | /s/  Timothy A. Timmins |   |
|--------|-------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|   |              | Timothy A.  Timmins          |
|   |              | President, Chief Executive   |
|   |              | Officer and Director         |
|   |              |                         |
|   |              |                         |
|   |              | /s/  Dale N. Wahl       |   |
|   |              | Dale N. Wahl                 |
|   |              | Senior Vice  President,      |
|   |              | Chief Financial  Officer     |

 

1

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROBERT PRIER , Appellant,

v.

LORENDA PRIER a/k/a LORENDA BEUKER , Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 708

[ May 12 , 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Dina A. Keever

- Agrama , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2019

- DR

003416

- XXXX

- NB

.
John D. Boykin of Ciklin Lubitz, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Deanna V. Shuler of Deanna V. Shuler, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, and Kathryn M

. Beamer of Kathryn M. Beamer, P. A., North Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN , G ERBER and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Reco Francwa ALEXANDER-FERBA, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D12-4731.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 16, 2012.

Reco Francwa Alexander-Ferba, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
#### Georgia B. BOOKER-HICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE EDWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-1698.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2000.

Decided Jan. 10, 2001.

Georgia B. Booker-Hicks, pro se. Robert Craig Wood, James Moss Johnson, Jr., McGuire, Woods, Battle *&*Boothe, Char-lottesville, VA; Fred Lewis Biggs, McGuire, Woods, Battle *&*Boothe, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before WILLIAMS and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Georgia B. Booker-Hicks appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting Prince Edward County School Board’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing her claims of racial discrimination and retaliation filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 *&*Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. *See Booker-Hicks v. Prince Edward Co. Sch. Bd.,*No. CA-99-653-3 (E.D.Va. Apr. 24, 2000).* We deny Booker-Hicks’ motion for appointment of counsel and her motion requesting that we order the School Board to permit her to conduct further discovery. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 We note that the magistrate judge did not have the benefit of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in *Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.,*530 U.S. 133, 120 S.Ct. 2097, 147 L.Ed.2d 105 (2000) (rejecting the “pretext plus” standard). Because we find that Booker-Hicks failed to provide any evidence of pretext whatsoever, the *Reeves*decision does not undercut the outcome reached by the magistrate judge.
##### 



Exhibit 32.01 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 of
Hartford Life, Inc. (the Company), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 as
enacted by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Thomas M. MarraName: Thomas M. MarraTitle: President and Chief Operating OfficerDate: February 28, 2005
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Media, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
C. Guccione, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                            /s/ Robert C. Guccione
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2002
645 A.2d 132

#### IN THE MATTER OF STEVEN R. BOLSON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

August 10, 1994.

ORDER

STEVEN R. BOLSON of LINWOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, having pleaded guilty to running an illegal gambling business, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. 1955(a)(1) and 2, and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. 1343 and 2, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*1:20 — 6(b)(1), STEVEN R. BOLSON is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that STEVEN R. BOLSON be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that STEVEN R. BOLSON comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the special financial report (the ‘‘Report’’) pursuant to Rule 15d-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Atlantic Express Transportation Corp. (the ‘‘Company’’), I, Domenic Gatto, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|  |           |                                                                                                                                               |
|--|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (i)  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|  |            |                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (ii)  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|  | /s/ Domenic Gatto                        Domenic GattoChief Executive Officer |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: September 28, 2007

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

----
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1083 

To amend the Act establishing the Rivers of Steel National Heritage Area 

in order to include Butler County, Pennsylvania, within the boundaries 

of that heritage area. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2007 

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. ALTMIRE, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. 

PITTS, Mr. TIM MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Ms. SCHWARTZ, Mr. HOLDEN, 

Mr. FATTAH, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. CARNEY, Mr. KANJORSKI, Mr. GERLACH, Mr. PLATTS, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. SESTAK, Mr. 

BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. DENT, Mr. MURTHA, and Mr. PATRICK J. 

MURPHY of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Act establishing the Rivers of Steel National 

Heritage Area in order to include Butler County, Pennsylvania, within the boundaries of that heritage area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1083 IH

1 SECTION 1. BUTLER COUNTY ADDED TO RIVERS OF STEEL 

2 NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA. 

3 Section 403(b) of the Steel Industry American Herit4 age Area Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–333; 110 Stat. 

5 4253) is amended by inserting ‘‘Butler,’’ after ‘‘Beaver,’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPR-17-0000100 17-MAR-2017 01:34 PM SCPR-17-0000100

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

IN RE MARGARET E. REFORD, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Upon consideration of Petitioner Margaret Elizabeth Reford’s petition to resign and surrender her license to practice law in the State of Hawai ' i, filed pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai ' i (RSCH), and of the affidavits and exhibits in support thereof, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g), that Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g). IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the name of Petitioner Margaret Elizabeth Reford, attorney number 6395, from the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai ' i, effective with the filing of this order. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, March 17, 2017. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
#### Ashley NERO, et al. v. Andrew RICHARD, et al.

Nos. 10-411, 10-409, 10-410.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Nov. 3, 2010.

*291Michael W. Campbell, Caffery, Oubre, Campbell & Garrison, L.L.P., Lafayette, LA, for Defendant/Appellee, Robert Bras-seaux, Jr.

Peter Forrestt Caviness, Dauzat, Fal-goust, Caviness & Bienvenu, Opelousas, LA, for Defendant/Appellee, Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.

Edward 0. Taulbee IV, Max Michael Menard, Taulbee & Associates, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants/Appellees, Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. and Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.

Jeffery F. Speer, Julian Louis Gibbens, III, Doucet & Speer, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiffs/Appellants, Susan Richard, Jenna Richard and Andrew Richard.

Christopher Shannon Hardy, Penny & Hardy, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants/Ap-pellees, Allstate Insurance Company and Andrew Richard.

Scott A. Stefanski, Edwards, Stefanski & Zaunbrecher, Crowley, LA, for Plain-tifi/Appellant, Ashley Nero.

J. Bradley Duhe, Ottinger Hebert, L.L.C., Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiffs/Appel-lees, Michelle Matlock and Steven R. Mat-lock.

Tracey A. Biagas-Hill, Sean P. Rabalais, Attorneys at Law, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants/Appellees, Allstate Insurance Company and Encompass Insurance.

Court composed of Oswald A. Decuir, J. David Painter, and Shannon J. Gremillion, Judges.

GREMILLION, Judge.

This case is consolidated with 10-409 and 10-410. For the reasons set forth in *Richard v. Brasseaux,*10-409 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/3/10), 2010 WL 4320424, 50 So.3d 282, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
#### Bobby J. JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D10-4122.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Feb. 18, 2011.

Bobby J. Jones, Wewahitchka, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Bobby J. Jones appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm in all respects save one. We conclude that Jones is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel as it relates to the failure to call Val Baker to testify for the defense. In all other respects, the denial of Jones’s post-conviction motion is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED for an evidentiary hearing.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                  741,000
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           380,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                             102,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1,552,000
<PP&E>                                4,857,000<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        6,983,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,168,000
<BONDS>                               1,788,000<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 63,000
<OTHER-SE>                            3,964,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          6,983,000
<SALES>                               1,379,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      6,404,000
<CGS>                                 1,516,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      5,038,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      141,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (1,146,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (1,146,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                         (1,146,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.19)

<FN>
<F1>  Notes and accounts receivable - trade are reported net of allowances for
      doubtful accounts in the Balance Sheet.

<F2>  Property, plant, and equipment are reported net of accumulated
      depreciation in the Balance Sheet.

<F3>  Excludes current portion.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>