alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Letter Agreement




 Exhibit 10.11 
  

					
		 	THE HERALD COMPANY, INC.	 	
		 	Clinton Square	 
		 	Syracuse, NY 13201	 

 December 14, 2006 
 Pulitzer Inc. 
 Pulitzer Technologies, Inc. 
 900 North Tucker Boulevard 
 St. Louis, MO 63101 
 Attention: Mr. Ronald H. Ridgway 
 Reference is
made to: 
  

	 	(a)	the Operating Agreement of St. Louis Post-Dispatch LLC (“SPD”), dated as of May 1, 2000, among The Herald Company, Inc. (“Herald”) Pulitzer Inc.
(“Pulitzer”) and Pulitzer Technologies, Inc. (“PTI”) (the “Post-Dispatch Operating Agreement”); 

  

	 	(b)	the Indemnity Agreement, dated May 1, 2000, between Herald and Pulitzer; and 

  

	 	(c)	the Operating Agreement of STL Distribution Services LLC, dated May 31, 2001, among Herald, Pulitzer and PTI, as amended (the “STL Operating Agreement,” together with
the Post-Dispatch Operating Agreement, the “Operating Agreements”), 

 and in the case of the two Operating Agreements, as
supplemented by the letter from Pulitzer and PTI to Herald, dated June 27, 2001. 
 On December 31, 2006, Herald intends to assign all of its
assets subject to all its liabilities to The Herald Publishing Company, LLC, a New York limited liability company (“HPC”). HPC qualifies as an Affiliate under Section 7.1 of each of the Operating Agreements. We hereby request the
consent of Pulitzer to the assignment of the rights and liabilities of Herald under the Indemnity Agreement to HPC. In that connection, we confirm to you that the facts stated in the letter dated May 1, 2000 from Herald to Pulitzer are true as
of the date hereof, will be true on December 31, 2006 and that all of the assets of the nature described in such letter will be transferred to HPC on December 31, 2006. Herald agrees to indemnify Pulitzer in the event and to the extent
that the assignment consented to herein causes any adverse tax consequences to Pulitzer. 








 Please indicate your consent to the assignment by signing and returning the enclosed copy of this letter.

  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	THE HERALD COMPANY, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Donald E. Newhouse



  

			
	AGREED TO:
	
	 PULITZER INC.
 PULITZER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


		
	By:	 	 /s/ Karen J. Guest

	Date:	 	12/16/06
	
	PULITZER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Karen J. Guest

	Date:	 	12/16/06
#### Davison *v.*Shaw *et al.*

Trial, 38 Oye. p. 1598, n. 22; p. 1702, n. 57; p. 1711, n. 19.

No. 6345.

March 14, 1928.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Park. Greene superior court. October 31, 1927.

*Miles W. Lewis,*for plaintiff.

*J. G. Faust*and *Noel P. Parh,*for defendants.

Gilbert, J.

This is a suit to cancel a deed made by the husband to his wife, on the grounds that it was made with intent to defraud, hinder, and delay the petitioner, a creditor, in the collection of the indebtedness due him; and that it was a voluntary deed made when the grantor was insolvent. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, and the exception is to a judgment overruling the motion for new trial, which consists of the general and certain special grounds. *Held:*

1. The grounds of the motion for new trial based on the court’s failure to charge designated principles do not show error. If these instructions were desired, written requests should have been submitted. Some of the principles mentioned ■ were substantially covered.

2. The grounds based on exceptions to designated portions of the charge do not show error. Where a charge is correct, it is not error for the judge to fail, in connection therewith, to charge some other correct principle. Other portions were not subject to the criticisms made.

3. In the light of the counter-affidavit, the ground based on newly discovered evidence will not require the grant of a new trial.

4. The verdict is supported by evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices coneur.*
583 A.2d 326

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES ANTHONY BROWN.

February 26, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
583 A.2d 323

#### JAMES NIGRO v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF SADDLE RIVER.

February 20, 1990.

Petition for certification granted. (See 237 *N.J.Super.*305, 567 A.2d 1010)
News United States Air Force
 Fall prevention video challengePublished March 18, 2016
                        
                        By Air Force Safety Center Public Affairs
                **KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE, N.M. (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Occupational Safety invites Airmen to challenge their creativity and participate in a safety video challenge to help promote the prevention of mishaps due to falls.
The videos that best communicate fall prevention will be posted on the Air Force Safety Center website and available for use Air Force wide, and included in occupational safety resources to highlight and promote Fall Protection Weeks, May 2-13.
A few simple rules apply: 
•	Videos should involve no dangerous activities 
•	No one gets injured in the video process
•	Length is no more than 30 seconds. Videos may be produced with the help of local public affairs -- if resources are available -- or created solely by the Airmen entering the video challenge. 
Submit videos to HQ AFSEC/PA Mailbox, or call 505-846-0468 for submission instructions. Deadline for entries is April 1.Kirtland AFB 



AFSC 



safety 



fall prevention 



AF Safety Center
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 21

                 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF SIERRACITIES.COM INC.


                                                            STATE OR COUNTRY
                                                            OF INCORPORATION OR
NAME OF COMPANY                                             ORGANIZATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SierraCities Financial, Inc. ..........................     Delaware
SierraCities Delaware, Inc.............................     Delaware
First Sierra Receivables, Inc. ........................     Delaware
First Sierra Receivables II, Inc. .....................     Delaware
First Sierra Receivables III, Inc. ....................     Delaware
First Sierra Receivables IV, Inc. .....................     Delaware
First Sierra Acquisition, Inc. ........................     Delaware
TFS, Inc. dba The Money Source ........................     Delaware
Corporate Capital Leasing Group, Inc. .................     Pennsylvania
Northcoast Capital Leasing Company, Inc. ..............     Ohio
Financial Management Services, Inc. ...................     Washington
Heritage Credit Services, Inc. ........................     Delaware
Integrated Lease Management Inc. ......................     California
Independent Capital Corp. .............................     New Jersey
Vendor Leasing Services, Inc. .........................     Georgia
21st Century Credit Leasing Services, Inc. ............     Florida
The Republic Group, Inc. ..............................     California
Republic Commercial Credit, LLC .......................     California
Republic Fleet Services, LLC ..........................     California
Nexsoft, Inc. .........................................     Florida
Eagle Holdings (Inc.)..................................     California
First Sierra Financial (U.K.) Limited..................     England and Wales
Suffolk Street Group, Plc .............................     United Kingdom
Titan Finance Limited .................................     England and Wales
Booker Montague Leasing Limited .......................     England and Wales
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60436-60437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24590]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Interim Change to the Military Freight Traffic Unified Rules 
Publication (MFTURP) No. 1

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.
SUMMARY: The Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command 
(SDDC) is providing notice that it is releasing an interim change to 
the MFTURP No. 1 on October 1, 2010. The interim change updates Section 
B, Item 21, Detention: Vehicles With Power Units (DEP).

ADDRESSES: Submit comments to Publication and Rules Manager, Strategic 
Business Directorate, Business Services, 1 Soldier Way, Building 1900W, 
ATTN: SDDC-OPM, Scott AFB 62225. Request for additional information may 
be sent by e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#51323930357f257f212338273425251124227f30233c287f3c383d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4d7dcd5d09ac09ac4c6ddc2d1c0c0f4c1c79ad5c6d9cd9ad9ddd8">[email protected]</span></a> or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5631333924313378373a3f331623257837243b2f783b3f3a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4621232934212368272a2f230633356827342b3f682b2f2a">[email protected]</span></a>.

[[Page 60437]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Chad Privett, (618) 220-6901, or 
Mr. George Alie, (618) 220-5870.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Reference: Military Freight Traffic Unified Rules Publications 
(MFTURP) No. 1.
    Background: The MFTURP No. 1 governs the purchase of surface 
freight transportation in the Continental United States (CONUS) by DoD 
using Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) exempt transportation 
service contracts.
    Section B, Item 21, has been updated in order to clearly define 
Tank Truck/Bulk Fuel free time and the provisions of free time in 
general.
    Miscellaneous: This publication, as well as the other SDDC 
publications, can be accessed via the SDDC Web site at: http://www.sddc.army.mil/Public/Global%20Cargo%20Distribution/Domestic/Publications/.

Henry Brooks,
Chief, SDDC, G9, Business Execution.
[FR Doc. 2010-24590 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

               LETTER RE: UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The Board of Directors
Northfield Laboratories Inc.:

With respect to the registration statements (Nos. 333-15877, 333-51681,
333-79579, 333-102672, 333-110110 and 333-128787) on Form S-8 and the
registration statements (No. 333-106615, 333-115459 and 333-121622) on Form S-3
of Northfield Laboratories Inc., we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein
of our report dated January 6, 2006 related to our review of interim financial
information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered to be a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
independent registered public accounting firm or a report prepared or certified
by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of
sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

Very truly yours,


/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
January 6, 2006
Unassociated Document


 

    EXHIBIT
10.39

     


    




    


    Mr. Ty
Anderson

    Andcor
Companies, Inc.

    294 Grove
Lane E., Suite 170

    Wayzata,
MN 55391

    


    September
15, 2008

    


    Dear
Ty:

    


    This is
to confirm that BioDrain Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) has approved an agreement
between the Company and Andcor Companies, Inc.  to issue a warrant to
purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s stock in conjunction with your efforts
relating to the search for the Company’s Vice President of Sales & Marketing
position.  The warrants will have a price of $.46 per share, will have
a five year term, and they will be issued to you upon the commencement of
Kirsten Doerfert’s employment with the Company.  Standard Andcor
guarantees will apply to the issuance of the warrants if Ms. Doerfert should not
remain employed with the Company for at least one year from here commencement
date, currently scheduled for February 1, 2009.    If this
meets with your understanding, please sign and return to me at your earliest
convenience.

    


    Ty, we
appreciate your continued support and look forward to fulfilling all of our
obligations to your firm.  Thank you.

    


    Sincerely,

    


    
      	
              /s/ Kevin R.
      Davidson

            	
              /s/ Ty
      Anderson

            
	
              Kevin
      R. Davidson

            	
              Ty
      Anderson

            
	
              President
      & CEO

            	
              Andcor
      Companies, Inc.

            


    

    


    

      BioDrain
Medical, Incorporated

      2060
Centre Pointe Boulevard | Suite 7 | Mendota Heights, Minnesota, USA
55120-1269

      Phone:  +1-651-389-4800
| fax: +1-651-389-4801 | www.biodrainmedical.com
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the: (i) Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (No. 333-29069) related to the Company's Stock Incentive Plan; and
(ii) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-43291) related to the Company's
Management Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated April 19, 2002, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Crescent Operating, Inc. included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Dallas, Texas
May 1, 2002
#### SCHOOL BOARD OF SUMTER COUNTY, Appellant, v. Donald BROWN and Melanie Brown, Appellee.

No. 5D09-1141.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Feb. 18, 2011.

*611Michael H. Bowling, of Bells, Roper <& Kohlmyer, P. A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Joseph H. Shaughnessy, of Morgan & Morgan, P. A., Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this personal injury action we conclude, as did the trial judge, that the contractual discounts associated with the plaintiff/appellee’s medical bills fall within the statutory definition of “collateral sources,” and affirm. *See Goble v. Frohman,*901 So.2d 830 (Fla.2005); *cf. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corp. v. Lasky,*868 So.2d 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), *review dismissed,*873 So.2d 1225 (Fla.2004).

AFFIRMED.

MONACO, C.J., EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 3.1
   
 BYLAWS
 OF
 MAKEMUSIC, INC.
 ARTICLE I.  Offices.
 Section 1. Registered Office.
 Section 2. Other Offices.
 ARTICLE II.  Meetings of Shareholders.
 Section 1. Place of Meeting.
 Section 2. Date of Meeting.




---



##### 



Section 3. Notice of Regular Meetings.
 Section 4. Special Meetings.
 Section 5. Notice of Special Meetings.
 Section 6. Business to be Transacted.
 Section 7. Waiver of Notice.
 Section 8. Quorum and Adjournment.




---



##### 



Section 9. Voting Rights.
 Section 10. Manner of Voting.
 Section 11. Record Date.
 Section 12. Organization of Meetings.
 Section 13. Action Without a Meeting.




---



##### 



ARTICLE III.  Board of Directors.
 Section 1. General Powers.
 Section 2. Number and Term of Office.
 Section 3. Resignation and Removal.
 Section 4. Vacancies.
 Section 5. Meeting of Directors.
 Section 6. Calling Meetings.
 Section 7. Participation by Conference Telephone.




---



##### 



Section 8. Waiver of Notice.
 Section 9. Absent Directors.
 Section 10. Quorum.
 Section 11. Organization of Meetings.
 Section 12. Action Without Meeting.




---



##### 



Section 13. Compensation of Directors.
 ARTICLE IV.  Officers.
 Section 1. Number.
 Section 2. Election.
 Section 3. Other Officers and Agents.
 Section 4. Salaries.
 Section 5. Term of Office.
 Section 6.
The Chief Executive Officer.




---



##### 



Section 7.
The President.
 Section 8.
The Vice President.
 Section 9.
The Secretary.
 Section 10. Assistant Secretary.
 Section 11.
The Treasurer.
 Section 12. Treasurers Accounting.




---



##### 



Section 13. Treasurers Bond.
 Section l4. Assistant Treasurer.
 ARTICLE V.  Shares and their Transfer.
 Section 1. Certificated or Uncertificated Stock
 Section 2. Facsimile Signatures
 Section 3. Lost or Destroyed Certificates




---



##### 



Section 4. Transfers of Stock
 Section 5. Registered Shareholders
 ARTICLE VI.  General Provisions.
 Section 1. Dividends.
 Section 2. Reserves.
 Section 3. Checks.
 Section 4. Fiscal Year.
 Section 5. Seal.




---



##### 



ARTICLE VII.  Amendments.
 Section 1. Amendments.
#### John D. SILEO, Jr. v. Allan BERGER and the Law Offices of Allan Berger & Associates, a Professional Law Corporation.

No. 2011-C-2396.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Sileo Jr., John D.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. H, No. 2007-2655; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-CA-0295.

Denied.
#### Glen McLEROY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-0586.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 21, 2011.

Glen McLeroy, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

KAHN, DAVIS, and HAWKES, JJ, concur.
Report of Independent Accountants on Management's Assertion on
          Compliance with Minimum Servicing Standards Set Forth in the
             Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers


To the Members
Companion Servicing Company, L.L.C.

We have examined  management's  assertion  included in the  accompanying  report
titled Report of Management  that  Companion  Servicing  Company,  L.L.C.  (CSC)
complied with the minimum servicing  standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
(USAP) during the year ended December 31, 1997.  Management is  responsible  for
CSC's compliance with those  requirements.  Our  responsibility is to express an
opinion  on  management's   assertion  about  CSC's   compliance  based  on  our
examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on  a  test  basis,  evidence  about  CSC's  compliance  with  those
requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered  necessary in
the circumstances.  We believe that our examination  provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on CSC's
compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that CSC complied with the aforementioned
requirements  during the year ended December 31, 1997, is fairly stated,  in all
material respects.


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                        ---------------------

February 13, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,621,584
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,213,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    376,378
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,183,824
<PP&E>                                      72,232,195
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,644,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              70,051,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,195,489
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,095
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,112,102
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                70,051,320
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            58,258,720
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               54,761,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             737,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,759,917
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,098,269
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,661,648
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,661,648
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2486]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP10-12-000]


Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Staff Protest to Proposed Blanket Certificate Activity

January 29, 2010.
    Commission staff (Protestor) hereby withdraws its Protest to the 
Proposed Blanket Certificate Activity filed in the above-referenced 
proceeding on January 7, 2010.
    In its prior notice request filed on October 29, 2009 (in Docket 
No. CP10-12-000) and noticed on November 9, 2009,\1\ Florida Gas 
Transmission Company, LLC proposed to replace, upgrade, and relocate 
portions of the existing St. Petersburg and Clearwater South Laterals 
and Block Valve 24-10 in the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, 
Florida. Protestor protested the prior notice because the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service (USFWS) had not determined if the proposed project 
would impact any federally listed threatened or endangered species. 
Subsequent to the filing of the protest, USFWS made a determination 
that no impacts on federally listed species would occur as a result of 
the proposed project. Thus, Protestor's environmental concern has been 
satisfied. Accordingly, Protestor hereby withdraws its Protest to the 
Proposed Blanket Certificate Activity filed in the instant docket on 
January 7, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Notice of the request was published in the Federal Register 
on November 17, 2009 (74 FR 59,161).

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-2486 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/ Edward J. Fritsch                                                   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward J. FritschPresident and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner |   |
| April 28, 2010                                                      |   |

----