alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2445]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2010-OS-0012]


Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency proposes to delete a system of 
records notice in its existing inventory of records systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
March 8, 2010 unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by dock number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
    * Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    * Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 Defense 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody Sinkler at (703) 767-5045.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Logistics Agency systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the contact under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    The Agency proposes to delete a system of records notice in its 
inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not within the 
purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), 
as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system 
report.

    Dated: February 1, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
S200.50 CAH

SYSTEM NAME:
    Individual Weight Management File (July 14, 1999; 64 FR 37941).

REASON:
    Defense Logistics Agency no longer maintains this system of 
records. Existing records are returned to the military member.

[FR Doc. 2010-2445 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### Rosita R. MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY and F.A. Richard & Associates, Appellees.

Nos. 1D10-6350, 1D10-6353, 1D10-6357, 1D10-6364, 1D10-6365.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 13, 2011.

Patricia E. Thorne of Patricia E. Thorne P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s responses to this court’s January 7, 2011, order to show cause, and Appellees’ motions to dismiss, we conclude the order on appeal in each of these cases is a non-appealable, nonfinal order. *See*Fla. RApp. P. 9.180(b)(1). Accordingly, these appeals are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

LEWIS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, HHS.

# ACTION:

Correction of notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects typographical errors that appeared in the notice published in the January 28, 2010,                         **Federal Register**                         entitled “Findings of Misconduct in Science.”                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         February 10, 2010.                    

*Applicability Date:*                         The correction notice is applicable for the Findings of Misconduct in Science notice published on January 28, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Gorirossi or Sheila Fleming at 240-453-8800.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## I. Background

In FR Doc. 2010-1706 of January 28, 2010 (75 FR 4566), there were two typographical errors. The errors are identified and corrected in the Correction of Errors section below.

## II. Correction of Errors

In FR Doc. 2010-1706 of January 28, 2010 (75 FR 4566), make the following corrections:

1. On page 4566, second column, first paragraph, change the date of January 7, 2010, to January 5, 2010, so that the first paragraph reads as follows: “Summary: Notice is hereby given that on January 5, 2010, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Debarring Official, on behalf of the Secretary of HHS, issued a final notice of debarment based on the misconduct in science findings of the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) in the following case:”

2. On page 4566, third column, last line of the first paragraph, change the date of January 7, 2010, to January 5, 2010, so that the last line of this paragraph reads as follows: “Thus, the scientific misconduct findings set forth above became effective, and the following administrative actions have been implemented for a period of three (3) years, beginning on January 5, 2010.”

Dated: January 29, 2010.

John Dahlberg,

Director, Division of Research Investigations, Office of Research Integrity.

[FR Doc. 2010-2488 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-17-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ABR
INFORMATION SERVICES, INC. FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                      18,372,658
<SECURITIES>                               144,558,769
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,740,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                    43,612
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           170,401,850
<PP&E>                                      18,147,975
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,976,011
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             207,652,958
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,112,508
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       136,249
<OTHER-SE>                                 183,954,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               207,652,958
<SALES>                                     10,389,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,389,193
<CGS>                                        5,914,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,146,940
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,665
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (1,960,062)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,227,070
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,615,707
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,611,363
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,611,363
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATIONS





The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of Valley Financial Corporation, certifies that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).








Date:  November 12, 2010
By:
/s/ Ellis L. GutshallChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31

                                  CERTIFICATION
            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, John D. Richardson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of CIMNET, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
     the registrant and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
     of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5.   I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
     over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting.


Date: March 31, 2006

/s/ JOHN D. RICHARDSON
-----------------------------
John D. Richardson
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer
**Exhibit** **32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

I, David M. Bronson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ David M. Bronson

David M. Bronson

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

November 8, 2005
### The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for 1 

### the Eastern District of Arkansas. ___________ No. 96-1761/2447

___________ Bob Hope, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: October 30, 1996 Filed: November 4, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, Bob Hope challenges the distric t court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion (No. 96-1761) and hi s

1 motion for discovery (No. 96-2447). Having reviewed the record and th e parties' briefs, we c onclude Hope is not entitled to section 2255 relief, and accordingly affir m the judgment in No. 96-1761. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. As Hope filed his discovery motion after filing the notice of appeal in his section 2255 action, the district court lacked jurisdiction to conside r and rule on the motion. Thus, we dismiss appeal No. 96-2447.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Johnetta ANDERSON, Margaret Griffin, Brenda Coleman, Annie Pumphrey, Bernadette Clark and Cedric Wayne Coleman, Individually and on Behalf of Their Deceased Mother, Augusta Davidson v. LIFECARE HOSPITALS, INC., et al.

No. 2010-CC-2240.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re Lifecare Holdings Inc.; Lifecare Hospitals Inc. et al.; Lifecare Hospitals LLC d/b/a; Lifecare Management Services LLC; —Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 537,316; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45963-CW.

Denied.

VICTORY, GUDRY and CLARK, JJ„ would grant.
#### Mayra VILLEDA, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Edgardo Villeda, deceased, Appellant, v. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 3D09-1735.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 6, 2010.

Abramowitz & Pomerantz, and Howard L. Pomerantz, Sunrise; Nancy Little Hoffman, for appellant.

Juliet M. Roulhac, Miami, for appellee.

Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and COPE and ROTHENBERG, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Brown v. Estate of A.P. Stuckey,*749 So.2d 490 (Fla.1999).
#### Kalbac *v.*Kalbac.

[No. 19,602.

Filed October 3, 1961.

Rehearing denied November 9, 1961.

Transfer denied December 20, 1961.]

*594
      *Sidney Kreiger,*of Gary, for appellant.

*Sachs, Ritman & Tanasijevich,*of Hammond, *for*appellee.

Pfaff, C. J.

Appellant brought this action against appellee to partition certain real estate in Lake County, Indiana. Trial to the court resulted in judgment in favor of appellee. The error assigned here is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial. The only specification of that motion is that “the finding of the court is contrary to law.”

Appellee did not file an answer to the brief filed by appellant. If the appellant’s brief had made *a prima facie case of reversible error*this would have justified a reversal of this action. *Wertzberger, Admr., etc.*v. *Herd*(1957), 128 Ind. App. 85, 146 N. E. 2d 115; *Newton, d/b/a, etc.*v. *Hunt, d/b/a, etc.*(1957), 127 Ind. App. 456, 142 N. E. 2d 643; *Sunn*v. *Martin*(1959), 130 Ind. 29, 161 N. E. 2d 487; 2 West’s Indiana Law Encyclopedia, Appeals, §394.

*595
      *594In all cases appealed to this court there is a presumption that the trial court correctly decided the ques*595tions presented. It is encumbent upon the appellant to rebut this presumption in his brief by clearly showing that the trial court committed serious error which denied the relief to which he was entitled under the law.

The appellant’s brief does not set out the writ of execution of which he complains, nor the Sheriff’s deed upon which he relies for reversal, and only a portion of the judgment of the trial court. The argument portion of his brief contains only his conclusions as to these matters. It wholly fails to establish error in the trial court. It follows that the judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Ax, Bierly, Cooper, Gonas, Kelley, Myers, and Ryan, JJ., concur.

Note. — Reported in 177 N. E. 2d 279.
#### FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF JEANERETTE v. Alicia Johnson BUTLER, et al.

No. 2011-CC-1979.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

In re Butler, Alicia Johnson; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Iberia, 16th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 113084; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 11-00543.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7187 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7187

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until December 7, 2018.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Flood Insurance Program 
Further Extension Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. PROGRAM EXTENSION.

    (a) Financing.--Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking ``November 30, 
2018'' and inserting ``December 7, 2018''.
    (b) Program Expiration.--Section 1319 of the National Flood 
Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is amended by striking 
``November 30, 2018'' and inserting ``December 7, 2018''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 7187

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until December 7, 2018.
```
#### Larry Leroy ARMSTRONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D10-0892.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 5, 2010.

*22Larry Leroy Armstrong, pro se, Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Charlie McCoy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Larry L. Armstrong appeals an order denying his motion for appointment of counsel in a postconviction proceeding. We dismiss the appeal as being taken from a nonfinal, nonappealable order, and deny appellant’s request to treat his initial brief as a petition for writ of certiorari. Even if the trial court erred in denying the appointment of counsel, that is a matter that can be adequately remedied on appeal from any adverse final order in the post-conviction proceedings.

THOMAS, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10KSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         200,636
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  394,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                    39,698
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               898,884
<PP&E>                                       8,314,384
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,642,284
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,570,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,651,304
<BONDS>                                      7,114,238
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,031
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,627,544)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,570,984
<SALES>                                      1,698,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,764,490
<CGS>                                        1,461,903
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,334,931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,963
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             947,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,550,838)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,550,838)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,550,838)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.62


</TABLE>
#### Scott GLENDENING v. CARIMI LAW FIRM.

No. 2011-CC-1284.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 2011.

In re Glendening, Scott; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. O, No. 636-947; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-C-464.

Denied.