alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Senesco Technologies, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, Leslie J. Browne, Ph.D, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)	The Annual Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in
the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Senesco Technologies,
Inc.







|Date: September 25, 2013 |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                         |  | /s/ Leslie J. Browne *               
|                         |  | Leslie J. Browne, Ph.D.              
|                         |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                         |  | (principal executive officer)        









* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0781

_____________________________

WALTON COUNTY BOARD OF 

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and 

PREFERRED GOVERNMENTAL 

CLAIMS SOLUTIONS,

Appellants,

v.

SHERRY TEAL MCHENRY,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Jonathan E. Walker, Judge.

Dates of Accident: November 28, 2014; November 28, 2016. 

September 18, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and WINOKUR, J., and KETCHEL, TERRANCE R.,

ASSOCIATE JUDGE, concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Brian T. Hanley of Public Entity Legal Solutions, Lake Mary, for 

Appellants.

Paul M. Anderson of Anderson & Hart, P.A., Tallahassee, for 

Appellee.
#### Patrick and Brenda O’CONNELL v. Dale BRAUD d/b/a Dale’s Builders and Remodeling.

No. 2011-C-1953.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

*946In re Dale Braud d/b/a Dale’s Builders and Remodeling; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 90,266; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1885.

Denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0162

ROBERT L. ROSE,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, BRIAN GOOTKIN, Director; 

and JAMES SALMONSEN, Warden of 

Montana State Prison,

Respondents and Appellees.

ORDER

Through counsel, Montana Department of Corrections, Brian Gootkin, 

and James Salmonsen have filed Notice that this appeal is not subject to 

mandatory appellate alternative dispute resolution under Mont. R. App. P. 7.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this appeal is NOT subject to 

mandatory appellate alternative dispute resolution under Mont. R. App. P. 7.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Peter M. Meloy is relieved of his 

appointment as mediator in this matter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 26 2023

05/26/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0162
#### Edwin R. JONAS, III, Appellant, v. Nancy GOLD, individually, and Linda B. Jonas, individually and as trustee of a constructive trust, Appellees.

No. 4D09-4386.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 13, 2011.

Roderick V. Hannah of Hannah & Jan-kowski, Plantation, for appellant.

Eric C. Christu of Ruden McClosky, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee, Nancy Gold.

PER CURIAM.

*Affirmed. See Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais,*554 So.2d 499 (Fla.1989).

GROSS, C.J., HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 09, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 09, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0140. DAVID R. JAMES et al. v. GARY H. CORN d/b/a RIVERHILLS

CONSTRUCTION .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2013SUCV353
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Senior Judge Hodges Argued at Norfolk, Virginia

CALVIN LEE BLAND

v. Record No. 2065-94-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY JUDGE ROSEMARIE ANNUNZIATA COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DECEMBER 12, 1995

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS Randolph T. West, Judge

George B. Pavek III, for appellant. Eugene Murphy, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Following a jury trial on August 22, 1994, the appellant, Calvin Lee Bland ("Bland"), was convicted of second degree murder and the use of a firearm in the commission of a felony. He was thereafter sentenced to forty years imprisonment for the murder and three years for the firearm offense. On appeal, Bland argues (1) that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of second degree murder; and (2) that the trial court erred, failing to instruct the jury on the elements of involuntary manslaughter. Bland contends for the first time on appeal that his conviction was contrary to the evidence. Bland failed to move the trial court to strike the evidence either after the Commonwealth concluded its case or after Bland concluded his, nor

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - did Bland move the court to set aside the verdict. Accordingly, Bland is barred from raising his sufficiency of evidence claim on appeal. See Parnell v. Commonwealth , 15 Va. App. 342, 349, 423 S.E.2d 834, 838-39 (1992); McQuinn v. Commonwealth , 20 Va. App. 753, 755, 460 S.E.2d 624, 625 (1995). Furthermore, Bland failed to object to the instruction of the court which omitted involuntary manslaughter as an alternative finding the jury could make. Rule 5A:18 bars this Court from reviewing objections which a party fails to make on time, when the occasion arises. Marlowe v. Commonwealth , 2 Va. App. 619, 621, 347 S.E.2d 167, 168 (1986). Bland urges the Court to apply the ends of justice exception to Rule 5A:18 and to consider the issue on appeal despite his failure to object. However, the "ends of justice" exception to Rule 5A:18 applies only when the record "affirmatively shows that a miscarriage of justice has occurred, not when it merely shows that a miscarriage might have occurred." Mounce v. Commonwealth , 4 Va. App. 433, 436, 357 S.E.2d 742, 744 (1987). Here, the jury was properly instructed that malice is the state of mind which results in the intentional doing of a wrongful act to another without justification and that malice can be inferred from the deliberate use of a deadly weapon. The evidence is undisputed that Bland shot an unarmed man from close range with a high caliber weapon after which he fled the scene and hid the murder weapon. As such, even if failing to give an- 3 - involuntary manslaughter instruction was erroneous, the record does not affirmatively show that a miscarriage of justice occurred. The evidence was sufficient to convict Bland of second degree murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, Bland's convictions are affirmed. Affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 27, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00222

- CV

I N RE Leticia MONTEMAYOR

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Ele na D. Chapa, Justice

On May 26, 2016 relator filed a motion to amend and supplement her petition for writ of

mandamus by filing a supplemental record consisting of a complete transcript of the hearing held

by the trial court on June 16, 2015 in this matt er

. The motion to supplement is GRANTED.

Relator is ordered to file a supplemental record in this court no later than June 2, 2016.

It is so ORDERED on May 27, 2016

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

______________________________ __

Keith E. Hottle , Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011CVW001587 C3, styled In re R.E.M., a Child , pending in the County

Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Jesus Garza presiding.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

p0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

139020

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139020 COA: 290873 Macomb CC: 2 008-002254-FC ALPHONSE GRZELAKOWSKI, II, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 21, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Order entered May 2, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00189-CV

JACKSON FULGHAM DBA COMMERCE STREET PARTNERS, Appellant

V.

ALLIED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ET. AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-08353

ORDER

We GRANT court reporter Sharron R. Rankin’s May 1, 2014 second request for 

extension of time to file the record and ORDER the record be filed no later than June 2, 2014. 

No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,066

EX PARTE JUAN JOSE DELEON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 28518-361 IN THE 361 DISTRICT COURT ST

FROM BRAZOS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim.App. 1967).Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault

and sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.

Deleon v. State, No. 01-01-01237-CR (Tex. App.–Houston [1 Dist.], Sept. 25, 2003, pet. dism’d).

st

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel failed to file a timely petition for discretionary

review and that, as a result, Applicant was denied an opportunity to file a pro se petition for

discretionary review. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and
2

conclusions of law. Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit,

the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to file

a timely petition for discretionary review. The trial court recommended that relief be granted. We

find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for

discretionary review of the judgment of the First Court of Appeals in Cause No. 01-01-01237-CR

that affirmed his conviction in Case No. 28518-361 from the 361 Judicial District Court of Brazos st

County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the First Court of Appeals

within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: January 14, 2009

Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 59750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23996]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12258 and <greek-i>12259]


Iowa Disaster Number IA-00026

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 5.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Iowa (FEMA-
1930-DR), dated 07/29/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 06/01/2010 through 08/31/2010.
    Effective Date: 09/17/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/27/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/29/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Iowa, 
dated 07/29/2010, is hereby amended to include the following areas as 
adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Pocahontas

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-23996 Filed 9-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
#### Howard A. CHEATHAM, Petitioner, v. Walter A. McNEIL, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 1D10-5357.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 1, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 2010.

Howard A. Cheatham, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

*25PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. *See Baker v. State,*878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).

WOLF, DAVIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6002-6003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2449]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

[Docket ID: USA-2009-0032]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by March 8, 
2010.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Application and Agreement for 
Establishment of a National Defense Cadet Corps Unit, DA Form 3126-1, 
OMB Control Number 0702-0110.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 35.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 35.
    Average Burden per Response: 1 hour.
    Annual Burden Hours: 35 hours.
    Needs and Uses: Educational institutions desiring to host a 
National Defense Cadet Corps Unit (NDCC) may apply by using a DA Form 
3126-1. The DA Form 3126-1 documents the agreement and becomes a 
contract signed by both the secondary institution and the U.S. 
Government. This form provides information on the school's facilities 
and states specific conditions if a NDCC unit is placed at the 
institution. The data provided on the applications is used to determine 
which school will be selected.

[[Page 6003]]

    Affected Public: State, local or tribal government; not-for-profit 
institution.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: January 26, 2010.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-2449 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Industrial Minerals Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert Dinning, Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

March 28, 2007                    /s/ Robert Dinning
                                  -----------------------------------
                                      Robert Dinning
                                      Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                      24,784,663
<SECURITIES>                                26,501,806
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,760,644
<PP&E>                                      13,308,418
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,352,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,743,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          876,109
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       140,974
<OTHER-SE>                                  53,626,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,743,604
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,680,874)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,680,874)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,680,874)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
ANNUAL REPORT
Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 1997-1
$ 209,433,212 6.50% Auto Receivables Backed Certificates
For the Year Ended December 31, 2000




           PRINCIPAL    INTEREST      NET       NET        30 +      DELQ.
              DIST        DIST       LOSSES    LOSS %     DELQ.        %
          ____________ ___________ ___________ ________ ____________ _______
 Jan-2000   2,783,933     254,507     160,671    4.36%    3,004,673    6.59%
 Feb-2000   2,614,933     239,427      63,601    1.84%    2,870,942    6.69%
 Mar-2000   2,811,237     225,263     131,335    4.06%    2,390,122    5.95%
 Apr-2000   2,860,441     210,035      61,840    2.07%    1,916,322    5.14%
 May-2000   2,249,799     194,541      35,820    1.28%    2,012,331    5.85%
 Jun-2000   2,648,211     182,355      94,787    3.67%    2,024,236    6.37%
 Jul-2000   2,280,473     168,010      23,936    1.00%    1,871,982    6.36%
 Aug-2000   2,130,129     155,658     (22,383)  -1.01%    1,844,078    6.76%
 Sep-2000   2,219,500     144,119     (14,288)  -0.70%    1,693,212    6.76%
 Oct-2000   2,011,639     132,097       7,997    0.43%    1,557,540    6.76%
 Nov-2000   1,977,783     121,201       6,398    0.38%    1,453,310    6.90%
 Dec-2000   1,783,429     110,488      (2,736)  -0.18%    1,506,351    7.82%
          ____________ ___________ ___________
   Totals  28,371,505   2,137,701     546,978

  **  The date represents the month of the Distribution date, the
      information is from activity of the previous month.
#### Alphonso PASSMORE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D11-2412.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Sept. 2, 2011.

*994Alphonso Passmore, Wewahitchka, pro se.

Pamela J. Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion will be filed with the lower court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the order denying the motion for postconviction relief in Case No. 05-1310-CF-53 in the Circuit Court in and for Putnam County. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

SAWAYA, TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.
#### Gerald WASHINGTON v. The SHAW GROUP, INC.

No. 2011-C-1211.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 2011.

In re The Shaw Group Inc.; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Office of Workers’ Compensation District 9, No. 07-04670; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-CA-568.

Denied.