alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7454** 

SAMUEL BURT , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. WANDA CARTER HALE , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 3:09

- cv - 03343

- SB )

Submitted : March 15, 2012 Decided: March 19, 2012

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Samuel Burt, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Kristy Markay Grafton, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opi nions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Samuel Burt appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burt v. Hale , No
. 3:09

- cv - 03343

- SB (D.S.C. Sept. 26, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented i n the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MakeMusic! Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Philip Sean Lafleur, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                |  |                        
|--------------- |  | -----------------------
|August 13, 2003 |  |                        
|                |  | /s/ Philip Sean Lafleur
|                |  |                        
|                |  | Chief Executive Officer

19
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Edward J. Graham, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2003, of South Jersey Gas Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e)):

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.





Date: March 12, 2004                /s/ Edward J. Graham
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Edward J. Graham
                                    President & Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1498 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1498

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the transportation 
                  fringe benefit to bicycle commuters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2007

  Mr. Blumenauer (for himself, Mrs. Capps, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Moran of 
 Virginia, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Snyder, Mr. Ruppersberger, Mr. McDermott, 
  Mr. Farr, and Mr. Capuano) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the transportation 
                  fringe benefit to bicycle commuters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TRANSPORTATION FRINGE BENEFIT TO BICYCLE 
              COMMUTERS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 132(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to general rule for qualified 
transportation fringe) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) Bicycle commuting allowance.''.
    (b) Bicycle Commuting Allowance Defined.--Paragraph (5) of section 
132(f) of such Code (relating to definitions) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
                    ``(F) Bicycle commuting allowance.--The term 
                `bicycle commuting allowance' means an amount provided 
                to an employee for transportation on a bicycle if such 
                transportation is in connection with travel between the 
                employee's residence and place of employment.''.
    (c) Limitation on Exclusion.--Paragraph (2) of section 132(f) of 
such Code is amended by striking ``subparagraphs (A) and (B)'' and 
inserting ``subparagraphs (A), (B), and (D)''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
#### Quintel GRIFFEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D10-614.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 5, 2011.

*758Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, SHEPHERD, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See State v. Hawthorne,*573 So.2d 330 (Fla.1991).
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Tisean STEWART.

No. 2010-KK-2480.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

In re Stewart, Tisean; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. D, No. 490-540; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-1016.

Denied.
NUMBER 13-13-00370-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

ANTONIO DEALLEN DEAN, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 199th District Court 

of Collin County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides

Order Per Curiam

This Court has received the appellate record with the exception of Exhibit Nos. 8, 

9, and 11. The clerk of the trial court is ORDERED to forward Exhibit Nos. 8, 9, and 11 

admitted at trial in Cause No. 199-82063-2012 to this Court within ten days from the date 

of this order.
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the 

1st day of July, 2015.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,162,595
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,286,417
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    209,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,199,125
<PP&E>                                      67,386,083
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,324,895
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,421,949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,249,107
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,701
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,827,114
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,421,949
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,499,919
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,270,607
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             595,384
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,633,928
<INCOME-TAX>                                   690,865
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            943,063
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   943,063
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
ACCEPTED

04-15-00336-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

7/2/2015 4:28:35 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7/2/2015 4:28:35 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 190 (Friday, October 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 60865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24631]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Allied World 
Reinsurance Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 3 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2010 Revision, published July 1, 2010, at 75 FR 38192.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable 
surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the 
following company: Allied World Reinsurance Company (NAIC <greek-i> 
22730). Business Address: 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038. Phone: 
(646) 794-0500.
    Underwriting Limitation b/: $40,957,000. Surety Licenses c/: AL, 
AK, AZ, AR, CA, CT, DE, DC, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MD, 
MA, MI, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, PA, RI, 
SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WV, WI, WY. INCORPORATED IN: New 
Hampshire.
    Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference 
copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2010 Revision, to 
reflect this addition.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30th each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (see 31 CFR 
part 223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of 
July 1st in the Circular, which outlines details as to the underwriting 
limitations, areas in which companies are licensed to transact surety 
business, and other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: September 20, 2010.
Laura Carrico,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-24631 Filed 9-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
EX-10.4






EXHIBIT 10.4




2009-1 AMENDMENT




TO THE




STEELCASE INC. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

(Effective as of September 1, 1999)





          This 2009-1 Amendment to the Steelcase Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (“Plan”) is adopted by
Steelcase Inc.




          Pursuant to Section 6.10 of the Plan, Steelcase Inc. amends the Plan as follows:




A.




          Effective November 1, 2008, a new Section 5.5 is added as follows:




          5.5 Special Distribution Election




          A Participant may make a special one-time election, no later than December 31, 2008, to change
the date and form of payment of all or a portion of the Participant’s Deferral Account. A
Participant who elects to change the date or form of distribution of all or a portion of his or her
Deferral Account under this Section 5.5 shall receive his or her distribution as elected, provided
that the date of payment shall be no earlier than January 1, 2009. Notwithstanding the preceding
provisions of this Section 5.5, the current deferral election of a Participant who elects to change
the date or form of distribution of all or a portion of his or her Deferral Account shall continue
in effect for the remainder of the Plan Year beginning March 1, 2008. In addition, a Participant
who elects to change the date or form of payment of all or a portion of his or her Deferral Account
may still elect to defer a portion of his or her Base Salary or Bonus to be earned during any Plan
Year beginning on or after March 1, 2009 by making an election in accordance with Section 4.1
during the Election Period applicable to such Plan Year.




B.




          In all other respects, the Plan shall be unchanged.




Signature




          Steelcase Inc. executes this 2009-1 Amendment to the Steelcase Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan
on the date stated below.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	STEELCASE INC.

 	 
	Dated:  December 22, 2008 	By  	/s/  Nancy W. Hickey
 	 
	 	 	Nancy W. Hickey 	 
	 	 	 	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Its  	Senior Vice President
 	 
	 	 	Chief Administrative Officer
Unassociated Document


    


      


       Exhibit 10.9.4

      Addendum
No. 9 to the Contract dated 2/25/07between
Cameron Jacobs and Millennium group Worldwide
inc.  concerning the property described as:
(Buyers)

       

      See Exhibit A atgdied hereto and
Incoreated herein
(the "Contract"). Buyer and Seller make the following terms and
conditions part of the Contract:

       

      
        	
                1.        

              	
                The
      legal description attached hereto as Exhibit A Is the legal description
      of the
      property,

              


      

      
        	
                2.        

              	
                Paragraph
      BOA line 183 of the
      Contract is hereby modified to substitute " single
      family residential " in place of "Vacant Platted
      Lots''.

              


      

      
        	
                3.        

              	
                The Parties hereby agree that
      all Buyers
      obligations in this Contract shall be contingent on the completion of
      the  Initial
      Public Offering ("!PO") placed by Buyer on or before August 17, 2007. At
      all times during the !PO  process, this agreement shalt remain in full
      force and effect. In the
      event the funding requirements of the IPO are not met
      and this transaction closed, on or before
      March 15, 2009, this
      agreement shall automatically terminate and the parties shall be
      released from all obligations
herein.

              


      

      
        	
                4.        

              	
                Buyer
      may assign this
      agreement to an entity controlled by
      Buyer without Seller's prior
consent.

              


      

       

      


      Millennium
Group Worldwide, Inc.

       

      
        	
                Date:

              	
                 
      December 31,
      2008

              	
                Buyer:

              	
                /s/
      Julius Jackson, Sr.

              
	 
      	 
      	
                Julius
      Jackson, Sr, President

              


      

      


       

       

      


      
        	
                Date:

              	 
      	
                Buyer:

              	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      


      

      


       

       

      


      
        	 
      	
                                                  
      Seller:  /s/ Cameron Jacobs

                                                                Cameron
      Jacobs

              
	
                Date:

              	
                 
      December 31,
      2008

              
	
                Date:                                           

              	
                Seller:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6082** 

WILLIE WORLEY, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

DANNY STANLEY, Sign Plant Manager; TOMMY MAY, Assistant Plant Manager; MR. PEARSON , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:09

- ct

- 03175

- FL )

Submitted : April 20, 2012 Decided: May 25, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Willie Worley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Yvette Harper, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Willie D. Worley, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Wo rley v. Stanley , No. 5:09

- ct

- 03175

- FL (E.D.N.C. Jan.
4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section
1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned hereby
certifies, in my capacity as an officer of NSTAR, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(i) | the enclosed Annual Report of NSTAR on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of NSTAR.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                                            
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  |  | 
|Dated: February 18, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JAMES J. JUDGE
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | James J. Judge                                             
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Senior Vice President, Treasurerand Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001035096
<NAME> WEB METHODS
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                     156,778,409
<SECURITIES>                                40,977,549
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,782,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                   801,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           176,885,319
<PP&E>                                       3,746,783
<DEPRECIATION>                                 651,847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             216,299,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,624,404
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       323,869
<OTHER-SE>                                 216,299,931
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               187,410,410
<SALES>                                     15,495,446
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,001,984
<CGS>                                          983,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,700,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            34,492,134
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               684,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (18,157,490)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (18,157,490)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.00)


</TABLE>