alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-QSB") of Guaranty Financial Corporation (the "Company"), I, William E. Doyle, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(a) the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-QSB.





Date:  May 15, 2003

By:  /s/ William E. Doyle, Jr.

William E. Doyle, Jr.

President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Guaranty Financial Corporation and will be retained by Guaranty Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Spiro Chris IOANNIDES, Appellant, v. Martha ALONZO, Appellee.

No. 2D10-1544.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 27, 2011.

Spiro Chris Ioannides, pro se.

Robert C. Rogers of Castle Law Group, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

KELLY, Judge.

Spiro Chris Ioannides appeals a final summary judgment of ejectment entered in favor of Martha Alonzo. Because Ms. Alonzo did not meet her burden to establish that there was no issue of material fact and that she was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Ms. Alonzo sued in county court to evict Mr. Ioannides from a home titled in her name but occupied by Mr. Ioannides. The county court determined the action should have been brought as one for ejectment, it allowed Ms. Alonzo to amend her complaint accordingly, and then it transferred the case to the circuit court. Before Mr. Ioannides filed an answer, Ms. Alonzo moved for summary judgment. Her motion was bereft of facts, and she did not file an affidavit in support of her motion. In response, Mr. Ioannides filed an affidavit alleging facts that could have provided a defense to the action. Ms. Alonzo did nothing to refute Mr. Ioan-nides’ factual allegations. The trial court nevertheless granted Ms. Alonzo’s motion and entered a final judgment for ejectment in her favor.

“A movant is entitled to summary judgment ‘if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions, affidavits, and other materials as would be admissible in evidence on file show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.’ ” *Estate of Githens ex rel. Seaman v. Bon Secours-Maria Manor Nursing Care Ctr., Inc.,*928 So.2d 1272, 1274 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (citing Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c)). Additionally, when, as was the case here, a plaintiff moves for summary judgment be*1203fore the defendant files an answer to the complaint, the burden is on the plaintiff to establish that no answer the defendant might serve or affirmative defense he might raise could present a genuine issue of material fact. *See W. Fla. Cmty. Builders, Inc. v. Mitchell,*528 So.2d 979, 980 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Ms. Alonzo failed to meet this burden. We therefore reverse the final summary judgment and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

WHATLEY and LaROSE, JJ„ Concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


Staff Acquisition, Inc.

Staff Insurance, Inc.

Staff Leasing, L.P.

Staff Leasing II, L.P.

Staff Leasing III, L.P.

Staff Leasing IV, L.P.

Staff Leasing V, L.P.

Staff Leasing of Georgia, L.P.

Staff Leasing of Georgia II, L.P.

Staff Leasing of Georgia III, L.P.

Staff Leasing of Texas, L.P.

Staff Leasing of Texas II, L.P.
|                                                                                     |   | Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
| Earnings:                                                                                |   |                                     |   |   |
| Income from continuing operations before equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |   | $                                        | 23,429 |   |
| Fixed charges                                                                            |   |                                     | 48,488 |   |
| Capitalized interest                                                                     |   |                                     | (344   | ) |
| Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated affiliates                                 |   |                                     | 2,150  |   |
| Total earnings                                                                           |   | $                                        | 73,723 |   |
|                                                                                     |   |                                     |   |   |
| Fixed charges and Preferred Unit distributions:                                          |   |                                     |   |   |
| Contractual interest expense                                                             |   | $                                        | 45,371 |   |
| Amortization of deferred financing costs                                                 |   |                                     | 1,642  |   |
| Interest expense on financing obligations                                                |   |                                     | 437    |   |
| Capitalized interest                                                                     |   |                                     | 344    |   |
| Interest component of rental expense                                                     |   |                                     | 694    |   |
| Total fixed charges                                                                      |   |                                     | 48,488 |   |
| Distributions on Preferred Units                                                         |   |                                     | 3,299  |   |
| Total fixed charges and Distributions on Preferred Units                                 |   | $                                        | 51,787 |   |
|                                                                                     |   |                                     |   |   |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                       |   |                                     | 1.52   |   |
| Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and Distributions on Preferred Units         |   |                                     | 1.42   |   |

----
Parraguirre

GISTARVE RUFFIN, JR., Appellant,
vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. No. 68248



### ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS These are pro se appeals from judgments of conviction. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Jerome M. Polaha, Judge.

The notices of appeal were untimely filed. NRAP 4(b); NRS 34.575(1); NRAP 26(a); NRAP 26(c). Because an untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court, 

### Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994), we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider these appeals, and we

ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.

cc: Hon. Jerome M. Polaha, District Judge Gistarve Ruffin, Jr. Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 19471..
#### Gregory Cornelius BYRD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-0502.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 28, 2011.

Shelley C. Eckels, Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking belated appeals of the judgments and sentences rendered on June 3, 2010, in Duval County Circuit Court case numbers 2009-15819-CFA and 2010-3189-CFA, is granted. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, copies of this opinion shall be furnished to the clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal in each of the foregoing cases. The court notes that the Office of the Public Defender has been appointed to represent petitioner in the appeals authorized by this opinion.

KAHN, DAVIS, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
#### BAYOU FLEET PARTNERSHIP, L.L.P. v. ST. CHARLES PARISH.

No. 2011-CC-1283.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 2011.

In re Bayou Fleet Partnership L.L.P.;— Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 72,433; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. ll-C-560.

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Targeted Genetics Corporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, B.G. Susan Robinson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                                          
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 16, 2009 |  | /s/ B.G. SUSAN ROBINSON                                  
|                         |  | B.G. Susan Robinson President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Noretta THOMAS and Demetrice Butler, each individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. A. WILBERT & SONS, INC., LLC and XYZ Insurance Company. Troy Robichaux, Shannon Robichaux, Michael J. Tuminello, Sr., and Olive D. Tuminello v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Health and Hospitals and through the Department of Environmental Quality and Dow Chemical Company.

No. 2012-CC-1534.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 12, 2012.

In re Dow Chemical Company; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Iberville, 18th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 55,127 *880CW 56,803; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2012 CW 0664.

Motion to dismiss denied; writ granted. The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, and the judgment of the district court is reinstated. See *Adams v. J.E. Merit Construction, Inc.,*97-2005 (La.5/19/98), 712 So.2d 88.
exhibit1031.htm -- Converted by SEC Publisher, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing





Exhibit 10.31

January 4, 2009

Board of Directors 

Borders Group, Inc. 

c/o Thomas D. Carney, Secretary 

100 Phoenix Drive 

Ann Arbor, MI 48108

Dear Tom:

I am submitting my resignation, effective immediately, as: (i) an executive officer of Borders Group, Inc., (the “Company”), and (ii) an officer and director of all subsidiaries and affiliates of the Company in which I serve as an officer or director.

This will confirm that, unless I voluntarily terminate my employment before April 10, 2009: (i) subject to the mitigation and other provisions of my agreement with the Company dated April 29, 2008, my severance benefit will be 18 months rather than 12 months, and (ii) I will be entitled to the retention and special bonuses as previously communicated to me and the vesting of restricted shares that vest by their terms prior to such date.

Sincerely,

/s/ Edward Wilhelm

Edward Wilhelm






The forging terms are agreed to and confirmed.

Borders Group, Inc.

By: /s/ Daniel T. Smith 

      Daniel T. Smith, Executive Vice President
110628-F-JZ020-787.JPG
            DR. DARRELL F. ZIMBELMANDr. Darrell F. Zimbelman, a member of the Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service, is Director, Electro-Optical Imagery Satellite Systems, National Reconnaissance Office, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Space, Chantilly, Va. He provides executive direction in the planning, coordination and management of a broad and complex range of satellite systems and programs in accordance with higher level program directives, diverse operational and legislative requirements.
Dr. Zimbelman began his career in the private sector working first for the Fairchild Space & Defense Corporation and then for ITHACO Space Systems Incorporated. In 1994, he began his civil service career with NASA working on several scientific missions including TOPEX/Poseidon, the Fast Auroral SnapshoT Explorer, the Transition Region And Coronal Explorer, and the Hubble Space Telescope Servicing Missions 3A and 3B. In 2002, he was assigned as the Deputy Project Manager for the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite N Series weather satellite program. In 2004, he joined the National Reconnaissance Office and was selected to lead and deliver a critical acquisition in record time to maintain continuity in support of military operations and national security needs. During his career he has acquired significant experience in program management, large-scale system acquisition and spacecraft design and development, relevant to both civil and national security space programs. He has authored or co-authored 23 articles in professional journals and conference publications.**EDUCATION**1986 Bachelor of Science in aerospace engineering, University of Colorado at Boulder
1987 Masters of Science in aerospace engineering, University of Colorado at Boulder
1990 Doctor of Philosophy in aerospace engineering, University of Colorado at Boulder **CAREER CHRONOLOGY**1. January 1989 - July 1991, aerospace engineer, Fairchild Space & Defense Corporation, Germantown, Md.
2. July 1991 - October 1994, aerospace engineer, ITHACO Space Systems Incorporated, Greenbelt, Md.
3. October 1994 - November 2004, aerospace engineer, NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
4. November 2004 - May 2011, technical intelligence officer, National Reconnaissance Office, CIA, Chantilly, VA.
5. May 2011 - present, Director, Electro-Optical Imagery Satellite Systems, National Reconnaissance Office, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Space, Chantilly, VA.**AWARDS AND HONORS**NRO Director's Circle Award
NASA Silver Snoopy Award
NASA Space flight Awareness Honoree Award
NASA Special Act Award
NASA Center of Excellence Award
NASA Exceptional Achievement Medal
NASA Astronaut Candidate Finalist
NASA Graduate School Researchers Program Fellowship**OTHER ACHIEVEMENTS**US Patent 5,211,360**PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS AND ASSOCIATIONS**Associate Fellow, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
(Current as of June 2011)
Doc# 64R2995.DOCX

No. 03-17-00705-CV

__________________________________________________________________

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN

__________________________________________________________________

IN RE UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND MATTHEW ZANER

Relators.

__________________________________________________________________

MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

__________________________________________________________________

James M. “Jamie” Parker, Jr.

State Bar No. 15488710

Larry D. Warren 

State Bar No. 20888450 

Whitney Broadwater

State Bar No. 24082733

NAMAN HOWELL, SMITH & LEE, PLLC

10001 Reunion Place, Ste. 600

San Antonio, TX 78216

Tel: 210-731-6364

Facsimile: 210-785-2964

Email: jparker@namanhowell.com 

COUNSEL FOR RELATORS

ACCEPTED

03-17-00705-CV

21331200

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

12/15/2017 3:56 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/15/2017 3:56:18 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Doc# 64R2995.DOCX

COMES NOW RELATORS, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC AND 

MATTHEW ZANER, and file this Motion to Dismiss and would show unto the 

Court as follows:

I.

On December 15, 2017, the trial court signed its order on the motion for 

reconsideration/clarification previously filed by Relators. Between the signing of 

the order and the Rule 11 agreement between the parties relating to the scope of 

discovery, the issues raised as a part of the mandamus petition have become moot. 

Relators therefore request that the Court dismiss this mandamus petition. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Relators request that the Court 

dismiss the petition for mandamus, and for such other relief to which Relators may 

be entitled. 

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ James M. Parker, Jr.

James M. “Jamie” Parker, Jr.

State Bar No. 15488710

Whitney Broadwater

State Bar No. 24082733

NAMAN HOWELL SMITH & LEE PLLC

10001 Reunion Place, Suite 600

San Antonio, Texas 78216

Telephone: (210) 731-6350

Facsimile: (210) 785-2950

jparker@namanhowell.com

wbroadwater@namanhowell.com

ATTORNEYS FOR RELATORS 
Doc# 64R2995.DOCX

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has 

been sent on the 15th day of December, 2017 to the following, as shown below:

S. A. Hayden Briggle Via E-Service and Email

State Bar No. 24059487

Parker P. Polan

State Bar No. 24060432

BRIGGLE & POLAN, PLLC

812 San Antonio Street, Suite 310

Austin, Texas 78701

Phone: (512) 472-1926

Fax: (512) 472-1174

hayden@brigglepolan.com

parker@brigglepolan.com

Attorneys for Real Parties in Interest,

Robert Strickland and Lisa Strickland

The Honorable Eric Sheppard Via CMRRR

County Court at Law No. 2

Travis County Courthouse

100 Guadalupe, Room 211

Austin, Texas 78701

Telephone: (512) 854-9242

Facsimile: (512) 854-4724

Respondent

_/s/ James M. Parker, Jr.____

James M. “Jamie” Parker, Jr.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-68929, 333-64242, 333-109332 and 333-125245 on
Form S-8 of our reports dated March 17, 2008 relating to (1) the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Gevity HR, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the "Company") which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123R,Share-Based Paymentand (2) the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Tampa,
Florida
March 17, 2008

---



QuickLinks
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2015

No. 04-15-00575-CV

B&P DEVELOPMENT, LLC and Chad H. Foster Jr.,

Appellants

v.

KNIGHTHAWK, LLC, Series G,

Appellee

From the 83rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 29842

Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 The reporter’s record was due October 23, 2015. On October 30, 2015, the court 

reporter filed a notification of late record stating that her other duties preclude her from working 

on the record and that she has not yet made arrangements for payment of the record with 

appellants’ counsel. She asked the we grant her an extension of time to complete the record until 

February 29, 2016 – a total of 129 days from the original due date. We granted the request in 

part, and denied it in part, ordering the reporter to file the record on or before February 22, 2016 

– 120 days from the original due date.

 

 On November 16, 2015, appellee filed a motion to reconsider our order, pointing out that 

rule 35.3(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure restricts this court from granting 

extension of more than thirty days at a time. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Accordingly, we 

GRANT appellee’s motion to reconsider and ORDER our November 9, 2015 order withdrawn.

As before, we GRANT the court reporter’s request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s 

record in part, but DENY it in part. We now ORDER the court reporter to file the reporter’s 

record on or before November 23, 2015, thirty days from the original due date, based upon the 

restriction set forth in rule 35.3(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. We advise the 

court reporter that additional notifications of late record may be filed, but each notification 

should request no more than an additional thirty days.
 We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the court reporter and all 

counsel. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of November, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

OWOSSO CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Three Months Ended
                                                            ---------------------------------
                                                             January 28,          January 30,
                                                                2001                  2000
<S>                                                          <C>                  <C>
BASIC:

Net loss available for common stockholders                   $(2,214,000)         $  (550,000)
                                                             -----------          -----------

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding           5,850,000            5,830,000
                                                             -----------          -----------

Basic loss per common share                                  $     (0.38)         $     (0.09)
                                                             -----------          -----------


DILUTED:

Net loss available for common stockholders                   $(2,214,000)         $  (550,000)
                                                             -----------          -----------

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding           5,850,000            5,830,000

Dilutive effect of stock options                                    --                   --
                                                             -----------          -----------

Weighted average number of shares outstanding                  5,850,000            5,830,000
                                                             -----------          -----------

Diluted loss per common share                                $     (0.38)         $     (0.09)
                                                             -----------          -----------
</TABLE>