alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         489,019
<SECURITIES>                                   219,032
<RECEIVABLES>                                  479,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,919
<INVENTORY>                                    242,449
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,636,183
<PP&E>                                         618,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                 335,182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,765,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          456,667
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           222
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,297,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,765,163
<SALES>                                        509,395
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               509,395
<CGS>                                          192,026
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,026
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               177,650
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (10,862)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                150,581
<INCOME-TAX>                                    41,798
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            108,783
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   108,783
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
        

</TABLE>
#### Pirkle *v.*Pirkle.

This case came before the court for decision by a full bench; and the Justices being equally divided in opinion, Russell, C. J., and Hill and Hines, JJ., being in favor of affirmance of the judgment granting an interlocutory injunction, and Beck, P. J., and Atkinson and Gilbert, JJ., being in favor of a reversal, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed by operation of law.

No. 6303.

September 12, 1928.

'Petition for injunction. Before Judge Stark. Barrow superior court. September 24, 1927.

*J. G. Pratt,*for plaintiff. *B. E. Kimball,*for defendant.
855 A.2d 761

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Derrick LINTON, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Jan. 13, 2004.

Decided Aug. 18, 2004.

A. Sheldon Kovach, Media, for Com. of Pa.

Robert F. Pappano, Brookhaven, for Derrick Linton.

Before CAPPY, C.J., and CÍASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2004, the order of the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas is reversed insofar as it declared the Registration of Sexual Offenders Act unconstitutional, and the case is remanded for further proceedings. *See Commonwealth v. Williams,*574 Pa. 487, 832 A.2d 962 (2003); *Commonwealth v. Maldonado,*576 Pa. 101, 838 A.2d 710 (2003).
#### TENSAS POPPADOC, INC. v. CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., et al.

No. 2011-C-0077.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

In re Angelle (Secy.), Scott; —Other; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Concordia, 7th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 40,769; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-124.

Writ granted. The plaintiff has failed to sustain its burden of proving under La. R.S. 18:3667.3(A) the relevancy of the facts sought to be proven set forth in its motion to compel and the necessity of the testimony of the witness prior to and at the hearing conducted pursuant to La. R.S. 30:29 on the availability of a more feasible remediation plan. As such, the motions to compel the witness’ testimony by deposition and at the La. R.S. 30:29 hearing are denied. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings in light of this ruling.

KNOLL and WEIMER, JJ„ recused.
858 A.2d 587

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. David Granger MARBLE, Respondent.

No. 957 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 1, 2004.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of September, 2004, upon consideration of the contention of respondent-attorney that he is suffering from a disabling condition which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to disciplinary charges brought against him in connection with Disciplinary Board Docket No. 29 DB 2004, it is hereby

ORDERED that David Granger Marble is immediately transferred to inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa. R.D.E., for an indefinite period and until further Order of the Court. Respondent shall comply with Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. All pending disciplinary proceedings against the respondent-attorney shall meanwhile be held in abeyance, except for the perpetuation of testimony.
#### C. W. Cleveland et al. v. A. J. Anderson.

(No. 3002.)

Appeal from Tarrant County.

Opinion by

Will-son, J.

§ 146. *Partners; who are inter se; construction of contract.*In construing a contract to determine whether or not it constitutes the parties thereto partners, the whole contract must be construed together, and the intention -of the parties- thereto must prevail. If it is apparent, from the instrument, that the parties themselves did not intend to become partners, then they are not partners. As between the parties to the contract, a partnership in fact can only exist where there is a voluntary agreement made for that purpose. There must be an actual intention to be partners, to constitute them such. [5 Wait’s Act. & Def. § 3.]

*139April 19, 1884.

§ 147. *Same; who are as to third persons.*But as to third persons, parties may be held liable as partners, contrary to their expressed intention as between themselves. To constitute a partnership as to third persons, all that is required is, that the parties to the contract shall have a communion of interest in the profits, and it is not essential that there should also be a community of interest in the property or capital, used in the business,' nor that there should be an agreement to share in the losses. [Goode v. McCartney, 10 Tex. 195; Bradshaw v. Apperson, 36 Tex. 133; Cathron v. Marmaduke, 3 Tex. Law Review, 15, 31; Legett v. Hyde, 58 N. Y. 272.]

§ 148. *Same; a contract which was held to constitute the parties thereto partners as to third persons.*One Slattery was awarded a contract by the city of Fort Worth to lay sewer-pipes, etc. To avail himself of the same, he was required to execute to the city a bond with security, in the sum of $10,000, conditioned for the faithful performance of said contract. He procured Cleveland *&*Cameron to go upon this bond as his sureties, and in consideration of their becoming said sureties agreed that they should have and receive one-third part of the net profits accruing to him from said contract with the city, and also stipulated that all money drawn upon said contract with said city should be drawn and received by said Cleveland & Cameron, and power to draw said money was expressly granted said Cleveland & Cameron in their contract with said Slattery. *Held,*that the said contract between Slattery and Cleveland & Cameron constituted them partners as to third persons in the contract with said city, and that as such partners they were liable for debts incurred in the performance of said contract with the city.

Affirmed.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Rhonda Jean Farmer, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00026

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 124th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 42604

- A ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and
Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note t hat the appellant, Rhonda Jean Farmer, has adequately indicated h er inability to

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 5, 2014
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
V 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1724 

For the relief of Maria Manzano. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2007 

Mr. WALSH of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Maria Manzano. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF MARIA MANZANO. 

4 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall 

5 pay, out of funds not otherwise appropriated, the sum of 

6 $20,228.25 to Maria Manzano of Syracuse, New York, in 

7 full settlement of all claims of Maria Manzano against the 

8 United States arising out of the improper disclosure of 

9 the records of the grievance proceedings brought in 1971 

10 by an employee of the Laboratory Division of the Depart11 ment of State asserting a complaint against Maria 

12 Manzano, a supervisor in such Division. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1724 IH

1 (b) NO INFERENCE OF LIABILITY.—Nothing in this 

2 Act shall be construed as an inference of liability on the 

3 part of the United States. 

4 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS’ AND AGENTS’ FEES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for an amount 

6 exceeding 10 percent of the amount paid pursuant to sec7 tion 1 to be paid to, or received by, any agent or attorney 

8 for any service rendered in connection with the payment 

9 under this Act. 

10 (b) ENFORCEMENT.—Any person who violates sub11 section (a) shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be 

12 fined under title 18, United States Code. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24952]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-3051-000]

Champion Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

September 28, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Champion Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 18, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail [email protected]. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24952 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
IB 

Union Calendar No. 174 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1696 

[Report No. 110–272] 

To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian 

Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 

tribe to determine blood quantum requirement for membership in that 

Tribe. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2007 

Mr. REYES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

JULY 30, 2007 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and 

Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to 

allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo tribe to determine blood 

quantum requirement for membership in that Tribe. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1696 RH

1 SECTION 1. BLOOD QUANTUM REQUIREMENT DETER2 MINED BY TRIBE. 

3 Section 108(a)(2) of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and 

4 Alabama and Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restora5 tion Act (25 U.S.C. 1300g–7(2)) is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘if the descendant’’ and all that follows through the end 

7 of the paragraph and inserting ‘‘if the descendant is en8 rolled by the tribe’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

Union Calendar No. 174 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1696 

[Report No. 110

–272] 

A BILL 

To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama 

membership in that Tribe. to determine blood quantum requirement for tion Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo tribe and Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas RestoraJULY 30, 2007 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 15


                        ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INDEPENDENT
                         CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                REGARDING INDEPENDENT AUTITORS' REVIEW REPORT


The Board of Directors
Northfield Laboratories Inc.:

With respect to registration statement No. 333-15877 on Form S-8 of Northfield
Laboratories Inc., we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our
report dated March 20, 1998 related to our review of interim financial
information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1993, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                                 /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Chicago, Illinois
April 8, 1998
#### STATE ex rel. Jimmie HARRISON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-0185.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Harrison, Jimmie; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 378604; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010-KW-1675.

Denied.
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, John W. Paulson, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of MakeMusic, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 1, 2006 By:  /s/ John W. Paulson    John W. Paulson    Chief Executive Officer
Order entered July 19, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00210
- CV
KIRK LAUNIUS , Appellant

V. DIANA FLORES, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDING OFFICER, CH AIR OF TRUSTEES, OF DALLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY

COLLEGE DISTRICT , Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 19
- 08429

O RDER By order dated June 16, 2021, we granted appellant’s agreed motion to

pe rmit submission of part of the clerk’s record by stipulation and instructed him to submit, by July 6, 2021, a flash drive containing appellant’s original petition, amended petition, second amended petition, and third amended petition. As of today’s date, appellant has not submitted the flash drive. Accordingly, we
ORDER appellant to submit the flash drive WITHIN TEN DAYS of the date ofthis order. We caution appellant that if he fails to comply with the order WITHIN

TEN DAYS , the appeal may be dismissed. S ee T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1736 

AN ACT 

To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 to provide for conjunctive use 

of surface and groundwater in Juab County, Utah. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1736 EH

1 SECTION 1. CONJUNCTIVE USE OF SURFACE AND GROUND2 WATER IN JUAB COUNTY, UTAH. 

3 Section 202(a)(2) of the Reclamation Projects Au4 thorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (Public Law 102– 

5 575) is amended by inserting ‘‘Juab,’’ after ‘‘Davis,’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1736 

AN ACT 

To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization 

County, Utah. junctive use of surface and groundwater in Juab and Adjustment Act of 1992 to provide for con-
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Around the Air Force: Next Chief of Space Operations, New COVID-19 Vaccine, GearFitPublished Aug. 5, 2022
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Britt Crolley
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, Lt. Gen. B. Chance Saltzman is nominated to be the new chief of space operations, a new COVID-19 vaccine becomes available for service members, and Airmen can provide feedback on armor and other gear through the GearFit application. (Hosted by Tech. Sgt. Britt Crolley)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- Lt. Gen. Chance Saltzman nominated to be next Space Force CSO****- Air Force prepares for newly approved COVID-19 vaccine: Novavax provides new option for unvaccinated Airmen, Guardians****- GearFit shortens feedback loop**USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



CSO 



Chance Saltzman 



Novavax 



COVID-19 



vaccine 



GearFit