alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
    THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
    JUNE 30, 1997  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
    REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1997      APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1997      JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                       2,932,388         2,932,388 
<SECURITIES>                         0                 0 
<RECEIVABLES>                        0                 0 
<ALLOWANCES>                         0                 0 
<INVENTORY>                          0                 0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             5,950,923         5,950,923 
<PP&E>                     115,193,286       115,193,286 
<DEPRECIATION>              28,589,729        28,589,729 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>              92,554,480        92,554,480 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        3,847,816         3,847,816 
<BONDS>                     45,852,948        45,852,948 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0                 0 
<PREFERRED>                          0                 0 
<COMMON>                        39,538            39,538 
<OTHER-SE>                  37,600,590        37,600,590 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>92,554,480        92,554,480 
<SALES>                              0                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             5,784,189         4,478,021
<CGS>                                0                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        0                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             4,030,448         3,027,581
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             777,026           603,905
<INCOME-PRETAX>                605,229           508,676
<INCOME-TAX>                         0                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            605,229           508,676
<DISCONTINUED>                       0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0                 0
<CHANGES>                            0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                   605,229           508,676
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      .23               .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .23               .13
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 60441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24515]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. PR10-12-001]


Arkansas Western Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

September 23, 2010.
    Take notice that on September 17, 2010, Arkansas Western Gas 
Company (AWG) filed pursuant to an August 20, 2010, Letter Order which 
required AWG to file within 30 days of the issuance of the August 20 
order a stand alone statement of rates that includes all currently 
effective maximum and minimum rates and fuel charges.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#81c7c4d3c2ceefede8efe4d2f4f1f1eef3f5c1e7e4f3e2afe6eef7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="65232037262a0b090c0b00361015150a171125030017064b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 1, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24515 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,564,375
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,691,460
<PP&E>                                       8,438,016
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,571,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,562,490
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,602,011
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,091,908
<COMMON>                                        98,591
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,436,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,562,490
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,278,031
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,335,279)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,335,279)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,335,279)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     ($.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   ($.14)


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Denise GRINDS.

No. 2011-KK-1271.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 2011.

In re Grinds, Denise; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. John, 40th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 2009-CR-225; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. ll-K-323.

Denied.
#### Anthony Jerome COOPER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-2701.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 9, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 29, 2010.

Anthony Jerome Cooper, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. *See*Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(c)(4)(A).

HAWKES, C.J., KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT B R IAN G. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. SALT RIVER

POLIC E DEPAR TM ENT; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-16158 D.C . No. 2:13-c v-00798-R OS M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na R osly n O. Silve r, Distric t Judge , Pre s iding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2014 ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. B rian G. Phillips a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt in his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a

rising out of a

n a lle g e dly

ille ga l se iz ure of his ve hic le and pe rsona l prope rty . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w for 

# F IL ED DEC 04 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).an a

b use of disc re tion a

distric t c ourt’ s dism issa l of a late r-file d a c tion a s duplic ative . Adams v . C

al. De p ’t of He alth Se rv

s ., 487 F.3d 684, 688 (9th C ir. 2007), ov e rrule d on othe r grounds by Tay lor v . Sturge ll , 553 U.S. 880, 904 (2008). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in dism issing Phillips’ s a c tion a s duplic ative of a

n e arlie r-file d

a c tion, Phillips v. Salt Riv e r Polic e De p’t, e t al. , No. 2:13-c v -00758-DGC , be c a use the c a u se s of a c tion, re lie f sought, a nd pa rtie s are t he sa m e in both a c tions. Se e Adams , 487 F.3d a t 689 (in de te rm ining whe the r a late r-file d a c tion is duplic ative , this c ourt e xam ine s “ whe the r the c a use s of a c tion and re lie f sought, a s we ll a s the pa rtie s or privitie s to thea c tion, a re the sa m e ” ). The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in de ny ing Phillips’ s re que st for e x te nsion of time to file his First Am e n de d C om p la int be c a

use he did not de m onstra

te good c a

use . Se e Ahanc hian v . Xe non Pic ture s, Inc ., 624 F.3d 1253, 1258 (9th C ir. 2010) (se tting forth sta n da rd of re vie wan d disc ussing the re quire m e nts for a

n e xte nsion of time unde r Fe d. R . C iv. P. 6(b)). AFFIRM E D .

2 1 3 - 1 6 1 5 8
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24752]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5415-N-18]


Notice of Availability: Notice of Funding Availability for HUD's 
Fiscal Year 2010 Healthy Homes Production Program

AGENCY: Office of the Chief of the Human Capital Officer, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD announces the availability on its Web site of the 
applicant information, submission deadlines, funding criteria, and 
other requirements for the FY2010 Healthy Homes Production Program. 
Approximately $10 million is made available through this NOFA, by the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117, approved 
December 16, 2009). The purpose of HUD's Healthy Homes Production 
Program is to prevent and correct significant housing-related health 
and safety hazards in low-income housing. This production-oriented 
grant program, modeled after the previously successful Healthy Homes 
Demonstration and Lead Hazard Control Grant Programs, will fund 
preventive and corrective measures to address housing-related health 
and safety hazards.
    The notice providing information regarding the application process, 
funding criteria and eligibility requirements can be found using the 
Department of Housing and Urban Development agency link on the 
Grants.gov/Find Web site at http://www.grants.gov/search/agency.do. A 
link to Grants.gov is also available on the HUD Web site at http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm. The Catalogue of Federal 
Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for the Healthy Homes Production 
Program is 14.913. Applications must be submitted electronically 
through Grants.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning the Healthy 
Homes Production Program, you may contact Michelle M. Miller, Director, 
Programs Division, Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control, 
Department of Housing and Urban Development; 451 Seventh Street, SW., 
Room 8236, Washington, DC 20410-3000; telephone 202-402-5769 (this is 
not a toll-free number); facsimile 202-755-1000; e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#672a0e040f020b0b02492a492a0e0b0b0215272f322349000811"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="703d191318151c1c155e3d5e3d191c1c1502303825345e171f06">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons with speech or hearing impairments 
may access this telephone number via TTY by calling the toll-free 
Federal Relay Service during working hours at 800-877-8339.

    Dated: September 27, 2010.
Barbara S. Dorf,
Director, Office of Departmental Grants Management and Oversight, 
Office of the Chief of the Human Capital Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-24752 Filed 10-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

N o. 04

- 20

- 00122

- CR

Ignacio SALAS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- 12

- 00129

- CRK

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

SIGNED June 9, 2021.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1658 

To amend the Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Act of 2000 

to explain the purpose and provide for the administration of the Baca 

National Wildlife Refuge. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2007 

Mr. SALAZAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Act of 2000 to explain the purpose and provide 

for the administration of the Baca National Wildlife Refuge. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND MANAGEMENT OF THE BACA NA4 TIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE. 

5 Section 6 of the Great Sand Dunes National Park 

6 and Preserve Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 410hhh–4) is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a)— 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 1658 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.— 

2 (1) When’’ and inserting the following: 

3 ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE.— 

4 ‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.— 

5 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—When’’; 

6 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘(2) 

7 Such establishment’’ and inserting the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(B) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The establish10 ment of the refuge under subparagraph (A)’’; 

11 and 

12 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Baca Na14 tional Wildlife Refuge shall be to restore, enhance, 

15 and maintain wetland, upland, riparian, and other 

16 habitats for native wildlife, plant, and fish species in 

17 the San Luis Valley.’’; 

18 (2) in subsection (c)— 

19 (A) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and in20 serting the following: 

21 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary’’; and 

22 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

23 ‘‘(2) REQUIREMENTS.—In administering the 

24 Baca National Wildlife Refuge, the Secretary shall, 

25 to the maximum extent practicable— 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•HR 1658 IH

1 ‘‘(A) emphasize migratory bird conserva2 tion; and 

3 ‘‘(B) take into consideration the role of the 

4 Refuge in broader landscape conservation ef5 forts.’’; and 

6 (3) in subsection (d)— 

7 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

8 the end; 

9 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking the pe10 riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(3) use decreed water rights on the Refuge in 

13 approximately the same manner that the water 

14 rights have been used historically.’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
| **Name**                                              | **Jurisdiction                of Organization** |
|-------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |                                            |
| Learning                Curve International, Inc.     | Delaware                                        |
| RC2                (H.K.) Limited                     | Hong                Kong                        |
| RC2                South, Inc.                        | North                Carolina                   |
| RC2                Brands, Inc.                       | Delaware                                        |
| The                First Years Inc.                   | Massachusetts                                   |
| The                First Years Inc.                   | Delaware                                        |
| Green's                Racing Souvenirs, Inc.         | Virginia                                        |
| DiecastExpress.com,                Inc.               | Delaware                                        |
| Racing                Champions Worldwide Limited     | United                Kingdom                   |
| Racing                Champions International Limited | United                Kingdom                   |
| Bondco                988 Limited                     | United                Kingdom                   |
| Acre                689 Limited                       | United                Kingdom                   |
| RC2                Deutschland GmbH                   | Germany                                         |
| Learning                Curve Canada Holdco, Inc.     | Delaware                                        |
| RC2                Canada Corporation                 | Nova                Scotia, Canada              |
| RC2                Australia Pty. Ltd.                | Australia                                       |
| LCI                (H.K.) Limited                     | Hong                Kong                        |
| RCE                Holdings, LLC                      | Delaware                                        |
#### In re The MARRIAGE OF Erin Blanch and Juan S. BLANCH, Jr.

No. 2010-CJ-2725.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 15, 2010.

*151PER CURIAM.*

| Relator, Juan S. Blanch, Jr., filed a rule for contempt in the trial court, alleging his former spouse violated certain visitation provisions in a custody judgment. The trial court continued the rule for contempt indefinitely on the ground the custody judgment was pending on appeal.

Upon relator’s application, the court of appeal granted the writ but denied relief. Citing La.Code Civ. P. articles 2088 and 3943, the court determined the “trial court erred by continuing the hearing on the basis that the taking of the appeal had divested the court of jurisdiction to hear the Rule for Contempt.” The court of appeal then proceeded to review the rule for contempt on the merits, and concluded “Relator’s allegations in the Rule, even if true, would not support a finding of Contempt against the Respondent.”

We see no error in the court of appeal’s judgment insofar as it finds the trial court is not divested of jurisdiction to consider the rule for contempt pending the appeal. However, we find the court of appeal erred in reaching the merits of the rule for contempt. Because no hearing on the rule for contempt has occurred, the appellate court should not have commented on the merits, if any, of this rule. Instead, the appellate court should have simply reversed the trial court’s ruling indefinitely continuing the rule, and remanded the matter to the trial court for further proceedings. Therefore, we grant relator’s writ application for the sole purpose of clarifying that the merits of the rule for contempt are to be determined on remand in the trial court. 12The appellate court’s comments on this issue are purely *obiter dicta,*and are not binding on the trial court. *See Boyd v. Wackenhut Corp.,*08-1388 (La.10/24/08), 993 So.2d 216.

*

 Chief Justice Kimball not participating in this ópinion.
#### John Robert JOHNSON, Jr. v. T & J HAULING COMPANY, INC.

No. 2012-C-0657.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Johnson Jr., John Robert; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Office of Workers’ Compensation, District 1-West, No. 10-01581; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,853-WCA.

Denied.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 9, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00869-CV IN THE INTEREST OF C.C.B., A CHILD On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-53400-2012 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Jus tice Molberg, and Justice Smith Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue . On February 2, 2022, we notified appellant his brief was overdue. Thereafte r, appellant filed two motions to extend time to file his brief, which we granted, making his brief due by March 24, 2022. On March 29, 2022 we again dir ected appellant by postcard to file the brief within ten days and cautioned him that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed his brief.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.3(a)(1); 42.3(b),(c).

210869F.P05 /Ro b ert D. Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
IN THE INTEREST OF C.C.B., A CHILD, Appellant
No. 05-21-00869-CV On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-53400- 2012. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating. In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered May 9, 2022