alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 60470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Request for Nominations for AHRQ Study Section Members--Notice of 
Correction

    On page 55334, Volume 75, Number 175, Federal Register notice 
publication dated September 10, 2010, under ``ADDRESSES'' section, the 
correct e-mail address is: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91daf8e2f9f4fff0bfc6f0f5f9e6f0fff8d1d0d9c3c0bff9f9e2bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f54766c777a717e31487e7b77687e71765f5e574d4e3177776c31787069">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 17, 2010.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director, AHRQ.
[FR Doc. 2010-24425 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-13-00354-CV

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 1016865

Style: Alfred F. Bernat

v Tomas Sotelo and Benancia Sotelo

Date motion filed*: February 20, 2014

Type of motion: Motion for Rehearing

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: n/a

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: 

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack 

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle 

Date: March 19, 2014
#### STATE ex rel. Troy RHODES v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-0299.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Rhodes, Troy; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial *1197Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. D, No. 432-709; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0015.

Denied.
H. R. 7187 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until December 7, 2018. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Flood Insurance Program Further Extension Act of 2018’’. 

SEC. 2. PROGRAM EXTENSION. 

(a) FINANCING.—Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking 

‘‘November 30, 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘December 7, 2018’’. 

(b) PROGRAM EXPIRATION.—Section 1319 of the National Flood 

Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is amended by striking 

‘‘November 30, 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘December 7, 2018’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Thefollowing certification is furnished pursuant to the requirements of theSecurities and Exchange Commission and shall not be deemed “filed” for thepurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section.  Such certification shall not be deemedincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that such certificationis specifically incorporated by reference by the registrant.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Metro One Telecommunications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, James M. Usdan,Chief Executive Officer and Duane C. Fromhart, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   Date:     November 14,  2005 | /s/ James M. Usdan       |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                                                              | James M. Usdan           |
|                                                              | Chief Executive Officer  |
|                                                              |                     |
|                                                              |                     |
|                                                              | /s/ Duane C. Fromhart    |   |
|                                                              | Duane C. Fromhart        |
|                                                              | Senior Vice  President,  |
|                                                              | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Anthony MARTIN.

No. 2011-KD-0654.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 31, 2011.

In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. D, No. 476-091; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0416.

Stay denied; writ denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at June 30, 1998 (unaudited) and Statements of Income for the
three months ended June 30, 1998 (unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       9,815,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,703,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,534,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (270,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    923,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,001,000
<PP&E>                                       3,633,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,752,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,106,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,142,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,835,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,990,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,106,000
<SALES>                                      7,664,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,664,000
<CGS>                                        4,911,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,911,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,405,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,586,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   587,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            999,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   999,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29


        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Patrick Dewayne DYAS.

No. 2010-K-0759.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Dyas, Patrick Dewayne; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 264,318; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,065-KA.

Denied.
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00083-CV

Martha S. CRUZ,

Appellant

v.

Brad BECK, et al.,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006-CI-17431

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 17, 2009

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

On February 26, 2009, appellant filed an Affidavit of Inability, asserting she does not have

the necessary finances to pay for the clerk’s record or reporter’s record in this appeal. On March 4,

2009, we abated this cause to the trial court for a determination of whether the appeal is frivolous.

On March 17, 2009, the trial court conducted a hearing on this issue and concluded appellant’s
04-09-00083-CV

-2-

appeal was frivolous and, therefore, she was not entitled to a free record on appeal. Accordingly,

on April 3, 2009, this court ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court no later than April

13, 2009 that the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee

for preparation of the clerk’s record. Our order informed appellant that if she failed to respond

within the time provided, this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX.R. APP.

P. 37.3(b). Appellant responded with a letter to this court stating she was unable to pay for the

clerk’s record and that she should not be required to pay for the record. 

On May 1, 2009, this court again ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court no

later than May 18, 2009 that the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay

the clerk’s fee for preparation of the clerk’s record. Our order informed appellant that if she failed

to provide such written proof, this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not responded.

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). 

Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.

PER CURIAM
#### Alfredo KINDELAN-HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D11-1590.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 20, 2011.

*1294Kathy Hamilton, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, C.J., and ROTHENBERG and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Hernandez v. State,*61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA).
#### Maggie Jo HILLIARD, Esq., and the Law Office of Maggie Jo Hilliard, P.A., Petitioner, v. JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION and/or the State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D12-2594.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 26, 2012.

Maggie Jo Hilliard, Esquire, Petitioner.

*1289Christian D. Lake, Assistant General Counsel, The Justice Administrative Commission, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition and direct the trial court to conduct a hearing and determine a reasonable attorney fee for the services rendered in this matter after April 11, 2011, by Petitioner.

GRANTED.

BENTON, C.J., THOMAS and ROWE, JJ., concur.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. 383 Madison Avenue31st FloorNew York, New York 10179RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2014-C19 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2014-C19Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.March 1, 2016  /s/ Brian SmithBRIAN SMITHVice President   Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### D.P., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D11-3031.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 3, 2012.

*1241Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Thomas Regnier and Michael Mayer, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before CORTIÑAS, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

D.P. appeals the trial court’s order withholding adjudication of delinquency for third-degree grand theft. Based upon the State’s concession that it did not establish that the stolen property constituted grand theft, we reverse the trial court’s adjudication of delinquency for grand theft and remand the cause for the court’s entry of a finding of delinquency for the lesser included offense of first-degree petit theft.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part with instructions.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jon Eberle, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HMN Financial, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

	a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	c)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 13, 2003			By   /s/ Jon Eberle

	Senior Vice President/Interim CFO
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60619

Summary Calendar

 

GAFARI MOREIRA,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION

SERVICE,

Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A29 899 927

- - - - - - - - - -

July 21, 1997

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gafari Moreira appeals the Board of Immigration Appeal’s

decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision to deny

political asylum and withholding of deportation. We have

reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and perceive no

reversible error. The petition for review is DENIED. This court

is without jurisdiction to entertain Moreira’s requests that we
No. 96-60619

- 2 -

review the proceedings in his pending motion before the BIA to

reopen his case and the Attorney General’s decision to deny bond. 

See 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a); Younger v. Dept. of Justice, 759 F.2d

450, 457 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 (1985). Finally,

Moreira’s motions for consolidation and for production of

documents are DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1529 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1529

               For the relief of Griselda Lopez Negrete.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2007

 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Griselda Lopez Negrete.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR GRISELDA LOPEZ NEGRETE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Griselda Lopez Negrete 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Griselda Lopez Negrete enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Griselda Lopez Negrete, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Griselda 
Lopez Negrete shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 
any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-41170 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ARCADIO GARCIA-CARDOZA, also known as Rene Garcia-Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-904-1
Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender ap p o i nted to represent Arcadio GarciaCardoza (Garcia) has m o v e d for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v . C alifornia , 386 U.S. 7 38 (1967), a nd United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia has filed a res p o n s e . We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein,

as well as Garcia’s response. We concur with counsel’s a s sessment that the appeal p resents n o nonfrivolous issue fo r appellate review. Accordingly, U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 18, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-41170 Document: 00512278539 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013No. 12-41170

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, c o u nsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL I S DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-41170 Document: 00512278539 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2013