alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30528 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ISAAC KNAPPER, also known as Jerry, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CR-252-K

-------------------- December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Isaac Knapper appeals his conviction following a guilty plea for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine hydrochloride in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1) and money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956. He also challenges the sentence imposed by the district court following his conviction. Knapper argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. As Knapper concedes, a defendant has no absolute right to unilaterallyNo. 01-30528 -2- withdraw a previously entered guilty plea. United States v.
Brewster , 137 F.3d 853, 857 (5th Cir. 1998). Knapper has never asserted his innocence as to the underlying offenses of conviction. Rather, he asserts that he is innocent of the facts which form the basis for the district court’s enhancement of his base offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines due to his leadership role in the offense. Based on a totality of the circumstances, United States v. Badger , 925 F.2d 101, 104 (5th Cir. 1991), the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Knapper’s motion. See United States v. Grant , 117 F.3d 788, 789 (5th Cir. 1997). Knapper also challenges the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines and the resultant sentence. Knapper made an informed and knowing waiver of his right to appeal except in the case where the sentence imposed exceeded the statutory maximum or where the sentence constituted an upward departure from the guideline range. Because neither of those conditions are implicated by the sentence imposed by the district court, this court is precluded from reviewing this issue. See United States v. Gonzalez , 259 F.3d 355, 358 (5th Cir. 2001).
AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 23


                      [CRISP HUGHES EVANS LLP LETTERHEAD]



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         As independent  auditors, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report, dated January 24, 2002,  incorporated by reference in this annual report
of SFB Bancorp,  Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2001,  into
the  Company's  previously  filed  Form  S-8  Registration  Statement  File  No.
333-76337.




                                                   /s/Crisp Hughes Evans LLP
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Crisp Hughes Evans LLP


Asheville, North Carolina
March 28, 2002


500 Ridgefield Court        828.254.2254
PO Box 3049                 828.254.6859 fax
Asheville, NC 28802         www.che-llp.com

AFFILIATED WORLDWIDE
THROUGH AGN INTERNATIONAL       HANDS-ON HELP, REAL-WORLD SOLUTIONS.











H:\0195sfsb\new10ksb99.wpd
EXHIBIT 10.15

     Schedule of Additional Employee Retention Agreement

     Goshen  Savings  Bank has  executed a Retention  Agreement  with Rolland B.
Peacock,  III, an executive officer.  With the exception of the name and address
of Mr.  Peacock,  all this  agreement is identical to, and there are no material
details  which differ from,  the  agreement  referenced  in Exhibit  10.1.  This
exhibit is prepared in accordance with SEC Rule 12b-31 and Instruction 2 to Item
601 of Regulation S-K.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 4, 2019

No. 04-18-00321-CV

ALMANZA BUSINESS GROUP, LLC,

Appellant

v.

CBI LOGISTIC SERVICES L. L. C.,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CVF-001798 D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing is hereby 

GRANTED. Time is extended until June 6, 2019.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of June, 2019.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of the MASHBURN MARITAL TRUST.

No. 2011-C-0177.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2011.

In re Mashburn, Don; Mashburn, Joseph P.; Mashburn, Joseph Patón “Pat”; Mashburn, Richard Anthony; —Other(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. G, Nos. 2001-003363, 71,685; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 0278.

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of NorthWest Indiana Bancorp (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of David A. Bochnowski, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Robert T. Lowry, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Dated:	July 23, 2012 |  | /s/ David A. Bochnowski                                                         
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | David A. Bochnowski

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer          
|                     |  |                                                                                 
|                     |  |                                                                                 
|                     |  | /s/ Robert T. Lowry                                                             
|                     |  | Robert T. Lowry

Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to NorthWest Indiana Bancorp and will be retained by NorthWest Indiana Bancorp and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OWOSSO CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE LOSS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                                                      -------------------------------
                                                                                      February 1,          January 26,
                                                                                         2004                 2003
<S>                                                                                   <C>                  <C>
BASIC:

Net loss available for common stockholders                                            $ (747,000)          $ (575,000)
                                                                                      ----------           ----------

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                                   5,824,000            5,824,000
                                                                                      ----------           ----------

Basic net loss per common share                                                       $    (0.13)          $    (0.10)
                                                                                      ----------           ----------


DILUTED:

Net loss available for common stockholders                                            $ (747,000)          $ (575,000)
                                                                                      ----------           ----------

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                                   5,824,000            5,824,000

Dilutive effect of stock options                                                           -                    -
                                                                                      ----------           ----------

Weighted average number of shares outstanding                                          5,824,000            5,824,000
                                                                                      ----------           ----------

Diluted net loss per common share                                                     $    (0.13)          $    (0.10)
                                                                                      ----------           ----------
</TABLE>
#### In re G. Thomas PORTEOUS, Jr.

No. 2011-OB-0078.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 12, 2011.

In re Disciplinary Counsel; Porteous Jr., G. Thomas; — Other(s); Applying for *875Petition for Voluntary Permanent Resignation from the Practice of Law in Lieu of Discipline Pursuant to Rule XIX, § 20.1.

ORDER

On December 8, 2010, respondent was impeached, removed from his office as a federal judge and was disqualified “to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust, or Profit under the United States.” Respondent now seeks to permanently resign from the practice of law in lieu of discipline. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) has concurred in respondent’s petition.

Having considered the Petition for Voluntary Permanent Resignation from the Practice of Law filed by G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 14903, and the concurrence thereto filed by the ODC,

IT IS ORDERED that the request of G. Thomas Porteous, Jr. for permanent resignation in lieu of discipline be and is hereby granted, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.1 and Rule 5.5 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that G. Thomas Porteous, Jr. shall be permanently prohibited from practicing law in Louisiana or in any other jurisdiction in which he is admitted to the practice of law; shall be permanently prohibited from seeking readmission to the practice of law in this state or in any other jurisdiction in which he is admitted; and shall be permanently prohibited from seeking admission to the practice of law in any jurisdiction.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Bernette J. Johnson Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana
Exhibit 32.2

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 906**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terry L. Stevens, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ TERRYL.STEVENS                                                |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Terry L. StevensSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| November 9, 2007                                        |   |
Order entered March 20, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00109-CV

CATAPULT REALTY CAPITAL LLC, Appellant

V.

TOBIAN JOHNSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-12714

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s unopposed motion for extension of time to file a brief. We 

GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER the brief received on March 15, 2019 filed as of the 

date of this order. Appellee’s brief is due by April 8, 2019. 

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1515 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the Housing and Community Development Act 

of 1974 to treat certain communities as metropolitan 

cities for purposes of the community development block 

grant program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

HR 1515 RFS

1 SECTION 1. METROPOLITAN CITIES. 

2 Paragraph (4) of section 102(a) of the Housing and 

3 Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5302) 

4 is amended by adding at the end the following new sen5 tence: ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of this para6 graph, with respect to any fiscal year beginning after the 

7 date of the enactment of this sentence, the cities of Alton 

8 and Granite City, Illinois, shall be considered metropolitan 

9 cities for purposes of this title.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 17, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Nathan PETTUS.

No. 2011-K-1326.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re Pettus, Nathan; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 09-656; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-KA-777.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J., would grant.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-60374

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Earnest Romond Breland, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:19-CR-60-1

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Earnest Romond Breland appeals the 120-month sentence imposed 

following his guilty plea conviction for possession of a firearm after a felony 

conviction. He argues that the district court erred in applying a two-level 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 18, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-60374 Document: 00516208424 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/18/2022
No. 21-60374

2

enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4)(A) for possessing a stolen 

firearm. 

The Government moves to dismiss the appeal or, alternatively, for 

summary affirmance based on the appeal waiver in Breland’s written plea 

agreement. Breland has not responded to the motion or otherwise addressed 

the validity of the waiver provision. Even if he had briefed the issue, any 

argument that the waiver is invalid or unenforceable under the circumstances 

would be without merit, as Breland was specifically admonished about his 

right to appeal and that he was giving up that right as part of his plea, and the 

waiver broadly precludes any challenge to Breland’s sentence. See United 

States v. Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th Cir. 2005).

Accordingly, the Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal is 

GRANTED. Its alternative motion for summary affirmance is DENIED. 

The appeal is DISMISSED. Counsel for Breland is CAUTIONED that 

pursuing an appeal contrary to a valid waiver and without responding to the 

Government’s invocation of the waiver is a needless waste of judicial 

resources that could result in sanctions. See United States v. Gaitan, 171 F.3d 

222, 223-24 (5th Cir. 1999).

Case: 21-60374 Document: 00516208424 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/18/2022
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATE
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
        ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Targeted Genetics Corporation (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
        David J. Poston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)          The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)          The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:     November
                  5, 2008
              /s/David
                  J. Poston
                David
                  J. Poston
                Vice
                  President, Finance and Chief Financial
                  Officer
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. DANIELS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, Respondent.

No. 9274.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued April 22, 1964.

Decided May 18, 1964.

*792Melvin H. Reifin, Atty., N. L. R. B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Coun-' sel, and James C. Paras, Atty., N. L. R. B., on brief), for petitioner.

Robert T. Thompson, Atlanta, Ga., (Knox L. Haynsworth, Jr., Greenville, S. C., and Thompson, Ogletree & Haynsworth, Atlanta, Ga., on brief), for respondent.

Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and BRYAN and J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

 The Board seeks enforcement of its order based upon a finding by the Examiner 1 that the Respondent violated Section 8(a) (1) 2 of the National Labor Relations Act by discharging two of its employees for having sponsored the election of a particular person as shop foreman, a concerted activity protected by Section 73 of the Act. Our duty to examine the record as a whole to determine whether there is substantial evidence to support the Board's findings was made impossible by the Examiner’s ignoring without explanation or analysis and seemingly without consideration the evidence offered by the Respondent. No anti-union bias was found, and the Respondent’s offer of a coherent and logical explanation for its conduct deserves a less cavalier treatment.

Denied.

1

. The Board adopted the Examiner’s findings, conclusions and recommendations.

2

. 49 Stat. 452 (1935), as amended, 61 Stat. 140, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1) (1947).

3

. 49 Stat. 452 (1935), as amended, 61 Stat. 140, 29 U.S.C.A. § 157 (1947).
644 A.2d 75

#### IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD J. SILBERFEIN, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

June 22, 1994.

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

CONSENT ORDER

THIS MATTER, having been opened to the Court by DAVID E. JOHNSON, JR., Director, Office of Attorney Ethics, and with the consent of Respondent Richard J. Silberfein of Hoboken, and it appearing that the Office of Attorney Ethics and Respondent having agreed to Respondent being temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending final disposition of the ethics proceeding captioned *OAE v. Silberfein,*Docket No. XIV-92-196E.

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Richard J. Silberfein of Hoboken, admitted to practice in this State in 1989, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further Order of the Court.

2. Richard J. Silberfein is hereby restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension.

3. Richard J. Silberfein shall comply with all the Administrative Guidelines of the Office of Attorney Ethics governing suspended, disbarred or resigned attorneys.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 60493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24542]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Advisory Circular 120-79A, Developing and Implementing an Air 
Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the issuance and availability of 
Advisory Circular (AC) 120-79A, ``Developing and Implementing an Air 
Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System''. This new 
advisory circular (AC) updates AC 120-79 originally issued on April 21, 
2003. This new AC provides information on methods of developing and 
implementing a Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS) 
required for commercial operators and air carriers certificated under 
Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 119 and 
conducting operations under either 14 CFR part 121 or 135. A CASS is a 
system that air carriers and commercial operators use to monitor, 
analyze, and optimize the performance and effectiveness of their air 
carrier maintenance programs.

DATES: The Office of the Director, Flight Standards Service, AFS-1 
issued Advisory Circular 120-79A, Developing and Implementing an Air 
Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System on September 7, 
2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Russell S. Unangst, Jr., Technical 
Advisor, Airworthiness, AFS-305, Federal Aviation Administration, 
Aircraft Maintenance Division, Flight Standards Service, 125B Summer 
Lake Drive, West Columbia, SC 29170; telephone (803) 451-2666; 
facsimile (803) 253-3999, e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c2b0b7b1b1a7aeaeecb7aca3aca5b1b682a4a3a3eca5adb4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c4b6b1b7b7a1a8a8eab1aaa5aaa3b7b084a2a5a5eaa3abb2">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    How To Obtain Copies: You can read or download this AC from the 
Internet at http://rgl.faa.gov or http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/advisory_circulars/ under the ``Advisory Circular'' 
hyperlink. In approximately 6-8 weeks from the date of issuance, you 
may obtain paper copies of this AC from the U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Subsequent Distribution Office, SVC-121.23, Ardmore 
East Business Center, 3341Q 75th Avenue, Landover, MD 20785. Telephone: 
301-322-4961. Fax: 301-386-5394.
    You can also order paper copies of this publication from DOT's On 
Line Publications Web site at http://isddc.dot.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC on September 24, 2010.
Steven W. Douglas,
Deputy Division Manager, Aircraft Maintenance Division, Flight 
Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-24542 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>