alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7181]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and                               ( print page 57826)                            Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Ancient Chinese Bronzes from the Shouyang Studio: The Katherine and George Fan Collection,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, from on or about November 5, 2010, until on or about January 2, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: September 16, 2010.

Ann Stock,

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2010-23694 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### Irven GREEN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 20919.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 5, 1964.

Rehearing Denied July 15, 1964.

*789Zach H. Douglas, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant.

,Samuel S. Jacobson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Edward F. Boardman, U. S. Atty., Middle District of Florida, for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BROWN, Circuit Judge, and BREWSTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction and sentence in this moonshine conspiracy case are affirmed. The contention that no act of the appellant was proved within the statutory period of six years is not controlling since there was ample evidence of appellant’s connection with the conspiracy less than a month before the critical date of February 1, 1957, and there was no evidence to show that his connection with it had ended prior to the occasion of the overt acts which occurred within the statutory period. See Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S.Ct. 1180, 90 L.Ed. 1489.

There is no merit in the contention while charged with participation in a single conspiracy dealing with separate stills, the proof showed two separate conspiracies. There were several distinct threads running through the actions of the parties m connection with all of the stills and this was sufficient to warrant submission to the jury of the question whether there wag sin le conspiracy embracing all four stills.

The judgment is affirmed,
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Smith, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ David A. Smith                  
|David A. Smith                      
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                                    
|August 5, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K AT
JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      16,818,889
<SECURITIES>                                 1,030,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,679,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,969,228
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            56,234,348
<PP&E>                                     147,804,168
<DEPRECIATION>                              72,836,574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             154,350,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,851,546
<BONDS>                                    110,628,223
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       250,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,364,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               154,350,976
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           166,078,034
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              158,864,765
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               750,000      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,739,065
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,211,819)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (600,936)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (610,833)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (1,052,917)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,663,800)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTHONY BRACY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 19 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of January, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6503

FREDERICK BALLENGER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

KEITH E. OLSON, Warden; MARK SIMPSON, Dr.,

Regional DAP Coordinator; MARGARET HAMBRICK,

Regional Director; ED CROSLEY, Administrator;

KATHLEEN M. HAWK, Director of BOP; JANET RENO,

Attorney General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge.

(CA-96-1902-5)

Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 21, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Ballenger, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United

States Attorney, Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ballenger v. Olson,

No. CA-96-1902-5 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 18, 1997). We deny Appellant's

motion for counsel and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
#### Henry HARMEL, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-1302.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 21, 2000.

Decided Jan. 5, 2001.

Stephen F. Shea, Willoner, Calabrese *&*Rosen, P.A., College Park, MD, for appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Assistant United States Attorney, Arthur J. Fried, General, Charlotte J. Hardnett, Principal Deputy General, John M. Sacchetti, Associate General, Sharon M. Saffron, Office of the General, Social Security Administration, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*125PER CURIAM.

Henry Harmel, III, appeals the magistrate judge’s1 order granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment in his action challenging the Commissioner’s denial of social security benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Harmel v. Apfel,*No. CA-99-33 DKC (D. Md. Jan. 14 & 19, 2000).2 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

1

. The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

2

. Although the orders from which Harmel appeals were filed on January 12, 2000, and January 18, 2000, respectively, they were entered on the district court’s docket sheet on January 14, 2000, and January 19, 2000, respectively. January 14, 2000, and January 19, 2000 are therefore the effective dates of the magistrate judge’s decisions. *See*Fed. R.Civ.P. 58 and 79(a); *see also Wilson v. Murray,*806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).
#### Terinthius R. GILES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-1822.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 13, 2010.

Terinthius R. Giles, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner is hereby granted a belated appeal of the January 3, 2008, order denying a rule 3.850 motion in Jackson County Circuit Court case number 06-0196-CF. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

LEWIS, ROWE, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 59680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24245]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Eleven Point Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Eleven Point Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Winona, Missouri. The committee is meeting as authorized under the 
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-
343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The 
purpose of the meeting is initiate review of proposed forest management 
projects so that recommendations may be made to the Forest Service on 
which should be funded through Title II of the Secure Rural Schools and 
Community Self Determination Act of 2000, as amended in 2008.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 19th, 2010, 6:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Twin Pines Conservation 
Education Center located on US Highway 60, Rt 1, Box 1998, Winona, MO. 
Written comments should be sent to David Whittekiend, Designated 
Federal Official, Mark Twain National Forest, 401 Fairgrounds Road, 
Rolla, MO. Comments may also be sent via e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e7a6976776a6a7b75777b707a5e786d30787b7a306b6d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d392a353429293836343833391d3b2e733b383973282e">[email protected]</span></a> or via facsimile to 573-364-6844.
    All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are 
placed in the record and are available for public inspection and 
copying. The public may inspect comments received at Mark Twain 
National Forest Supervisors Office, 401 Fairgrounds Road, Rolla, MO. 
Visitors are encouraged to call ahead to 573-341-7404 to facilitate 
entry into the building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Hall, Eleven Point Resource 
Advisory Committee Coordinator, Mark Twain National Forest, 573-341-
7404.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. The 
following business will be conducted: The meeting will begin to focus 
on the potential projects that the RAC will be reviewing. Persons who 
wish to bring related matters to the attention of the Committee may 
file written statements with David Whittekiend (address above) before 
or after the meeting.

    Dated: September 23, 2010.
David Whittekiend,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-24245 Filed 9-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE ex rel. Philip GIBSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2012-KH-0559.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Gibson, Philip; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. J, No. 506-743; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1790.

Denied.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-4 No. 333-57891) of Crescent Operating, Inc. and in the related 
Prospectus of our reports (a) dated March 29, 1999, with respect to the 
consolidated financial statements of Crescent Operating, Inc. and (b) dated 
March 2, 1998, with respect to the combined financial statements of 
Carter-Crowley Asset Group, both of which are included in this Annual Report 
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998. 


                                                  Ernst & Young LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 29, 1999
856 A.2d 41

#### In the Matter of Michael RADBILL.

No. 932 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 29, 2004.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2004, a Rule having been entered by this Court on May 28, 2004, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Michael Radbill to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that Michael Radbill is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1 SUBSIDIARIES OF WEBMETHODS, INC. NAME
    
    ORGANIZED INwebMethods West, Inc.
    
    DelawareDoor Acquisition, Inc.
    
    DelawareThe Dante Group, Inc.
    
    DelawareThe Mind Electric, Inc.
    
    TexasIntelliframe Corporation
    
    PennsylvaniawebMethods Worldwide, Inc.
    
    CaliforniawebMethods Canada Corporation
    
    CanadawebMethods UK Ltd.
    
    United KingdomwebMethods BV
    
    the NetherlandswebMethods Germany GmbH
    
    GermanywebMethods France Sarl
    
    FrancewebMethods Australia Pty Ltd.
    
    AustraliawebMethods China Co., Limited
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinawebMethods Hong Kong Ltd.
    
    Hong KongwebMethods Japan K.K.
    
    JapanwebMethods Singapore Pte Ltd.
    
    SingaporewebMethods Korea Co., Ltd.
    
    South KoreawebMethods Malaysia Sdn Bhd
    
    Malaysia
#### STATE ex rel. David FOREMAN v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-1706.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Foreman, David; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. D, Nos. 9739,10302; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 0757.

*1264Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
#### SEECO, INC., Arkansas Western Gas Company, and Southwestern Energy Company *v.*Allen HALES, Mary Nellie Hales, Robert G. Jeffers, David P. Taylor, and Taylor Family Limited Partnership “A”

98-670

969 S.W.2d 192

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered June 10, 1998

*470*Everett & Mars,*by: *Thomas A. Mars*and *John C. Everett;*and *Jeffrey L. Dangeau,*for appellants.

*Gable Gotwals Mock Schwabe Kihle Gaberino,*by: *James M. Sturdivant, M. Benjamin Singletary, Oliver S. Howard,*and *Timothy A, Carney; Smith, Maurras Cohen & Redd, PLC,*by: *Don A. Smith*and S. *Walton Maurras;*and *Marilyn Eickenhorst,*for appellees.

Per Curiam.

Defendants/appellants Seeco, Inc., Arkansas Western Gas Company, and Southwestern Energy Company (referred to collectively as Seeco) have moved to stay the trial court’s order disqualifying one attorney, Michael Fitzhugh, from further participation in this case. Seeco also has moved for expedited consideration of the stay motion. Plaintiffs/appellees Allen Hales and others (referred to collectively as Hales) in their response agree that the motion to stay should be considered expeditiously. They further move this court to grant expedited consideration of the appeal itself and offer an accelerated briefing schedule.

We grant the motion for expedited consideration of the motion to stay. We temporarily stay the trial court’s order pending resolution of Seeco’s appeal on the disqualification of its counsel. We grant Hales’s motion to expedite this appeal. Any supplement to the partial record on file with this court, including the trial court’s order, shall be filed by Wednesday, June 17, 1998. Simultaneous briefs shall be filed by the parties by Wednesday, June 24, 1998. Responsive briefs shall be filed by Monday, June 29, 1998. There will be no reply briefs.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jermaine E. FAVORS.

No. 2010-KO-1761.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 4, 2011.

In re Favors, Jermaine E.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 07-6079; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-KA-1034.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Daniel L. PEGUES.

No. 2010-KO-2058.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Pegues, Daniel L.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 6894-07; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 09-1089.

„ . , Denied.
seriesmcertificate.htm -- Converted by SEC Publisher, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing







Exhibit 4.1

  



WELLS FARGO & COMPANY

_________________________________

CERTIFICATE ELIMINATING THE CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATIONS

WITH RESPECT TO THE

CLASS A PREFERRED STOCK, SERIES M

(Without Par Value)

_________________________________

Pursuant to Section 151 of the 

General Corporation Law 

of the State of Delaware

_________________________________

The undersigned DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to authority conferred upon the Securities Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) of Wells Fargo & Company, a Delaware corporation (“Wells Fargo”) in accordance with Section 141(c) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “General Corporation Law”), the following resolutions were duly adopted by the Committee pursuant to the written consent of the Committee duly adopted on January 8, 2009, in accordance with Section 141(f) of the General Corporation Law:

WHEREAS resolutions were adopted by the Committee, which resolutions are set forth in a Certificate of Designations (the “Certificate of Designations”) filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on December 30, 2008, providing for and authorizing creation of a series of Preferred Stock, no par value, designated Class A Preferred Stock, Series M, with no par value and a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (“Series M Preferred Stock”).

WHEREAS as of the date hereof, no Series M Preferred Stock is outstanding.

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby:

RESOLVED that none of the authorized shares of the Series M Preferred Stock are outstanding and none will be issued subject to the Certificate of Designations previously filed on December 30, 2008 with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware with respect to such series.

RESOLVED that the Chairman, the President, any Vice Chairman, any Senior Executive Vice President, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President, the Secretary and any Assistant Secretary are hereby authorized to execute, acknowledge, and file such instruments and






documents as they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable to eliminate from the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, all matters set forth in said Certificate of Designations with respect to the Series M Preferred Stock.

 

[Signature page follows]






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WELLS FARGO & COMPANY has caused its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed and this Certificate to be signed by Barbara S. Brett, its Senior Vice President and Assistant Treasurer, and attested by Jeannine E. Zahn, its Assistant Secretary, this 12th day of January, 2009.

   

	  	  	WELLS FARGO & COMPANY  
	  
	   	  	By: /s/ Barbara S. Brett                        
	                                                                                                                      	  	      Barbara S. Brett  
	  	  	      Senior Vice President and Assistant Treasurer  
	  
	  
	ATTEST:  	  	  
	  
	By: /s/ Jeannine E. Zahn                        	  	  
	      Jeannine E. Zahn  	  	  
	      Assistant Secretary