alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w11






Exhibit 10.11




AMENDMENT TO

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL, INC.

1998 EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN




     THIS AGREEMENT by Weatherford International, Inc. (the “Company”),



W I T N E S S E T H: 




     WHEREAS, the Company previously established the Weatherford International, Inc. 1998 Employee
Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”);



     WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right in Article VII to amend the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Company has determined to amend the Plan to bring the Plan into documentary
compliance with section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Company agrees that, effective January 1, 2009, Article VIII of the Plan
is hereby amended by adding thereto the following new Section 8.11:




     8.11 COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 409A. The exercisability of an Option shall not
be extended to the extent that such extension would subject the holder to additional
taxes under Section 409A. This Section 8.11 is effective for Options that become
earned and vested on or after January 1, 2005.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed on the 31st day of
December, 2008.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Bernard J. Duroc-Danner	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	 

Bernard J. Duroc-Danner
	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Chairman, CEO and President
#### STATE ex rel. Robert HUDSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0672.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2011.

In re Hudson, Robert; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 03-03-0357; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 2245.

*657Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


                                CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Strasbaugh (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to their knowledge:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 16, 2009              By: /s/     CHUCK SCHILLINGS
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                                  Chuck Schillings
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                             (principal executive officer)


Dated: November 16, 2009              By: /s/       RICHARD NANCE
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                                    Richard Nance
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                             (principal financial officer)

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S7528]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 15--RELATIVE TO THE COSTS OF INTERNATIONAL 
                        PEACEKEEPING ACTIVITIES

  Ms. SNOWE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary:

                            S. Con. Res. 15

       Whereas in fiscal year 1989 the United States provided 
     $29,000,000 to the United Nations for assessed United States 
     contributions for international peacekeeping activities, 
     compared to $485,000,000 paid for combined assessed 
     contributions for all other international organizations, 
     including the United Nations, all United Nations specialized 
     agencies and the Organization for American States and all 
     other Pan American international organizations;
       Whereas in fiscal year 1994 United States assessed 
     contributions to the United Nations for international 
     peacekeeping activities had grown to $1,072,000,000, compared 
     to $860,000,000 for combined assessed contributions for all 
     other international organizations;
       Whereas for fiscal year 1995 the President requested a 
     $672,000,000 United Nations peacekeeping supplemental 
     appropriation which, if approved, would have been a direct 
     increase in the Federal budget deficit and would have brought 
     fiscal year 1995 total appropriations for assessed 
     contributions for United Nations peacekeeping activities to 
     $1,025,000,000;
       Whereas for fiscal year 1995 the President also requested 
     supplemental appropriations of $1,900,000,000 to cover the 
     Department of Defense's unbudgeted costs for humanitarian and 
     peacekeeping missions in Haiti, Kuwait and Bosnia, which are 
     in addition to regular United States assessed contributions 
     to the United Nations for peacekeeping activities; and
       Whereas for fiscal year 1996 the President requested 
     $445,000,000 for assessed contributions to the United Nations 
     for international peacekeeping activities, a funding level 
     most observers believe to be a significant understatement of 
     actual peacekeeping obligations the Administration has 
     committed the United States to support and which, if 
     accurate, would lead to the third year in a row in which the 
     Administration requests supplemental appropriations for 
     assessed contributions to international peacekeeping in 
     excess of $600 million outside of the regular budget process: 
     Now, therefore, be it
       Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 
     concurring), That the Executive Branch should cease 
     obligating the United States to pay for international 
     peacekeeping operations in excess of funds specifically 
     authorized and appropriated for this purpose.
     

                          ____________________
```
#### G., H. & S. A. R’y Co. v. A. W. Harman.

(No. 1643.)

Appeal from Gonzales County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 136. *Affreightment of live stock; stipulation in contract of, for notice of damage.*A stipulation in a contract of affreightment of live stock, that before the owner would be entitled to recover any damages for injury to, *129or loss of, said stock, he should first give notice in writing •of his claim for such damages, to some officer of the company, or its nearest station agent, before said stock is removed from the place of destination, is a reasonable and valid stipulation, and is binding upon the owner. It is entirely reasonable, because it gives the company, as well as the owner, an opportunity to examine the •stock with a view to ascertaining the exact amount and extent of the injury, and affords a chance of adjustment, thereby avoiding litigation. [W. & W. Con. Rep. §§ 374, 1257.]

March 12, 1884.

§ 137. *Duty of owner as to giving notice of damage.*If the owner did not go in person, or send an agent with his stock, he should at least have sent a copy of his contract to his consignees, in order that they might have complied with the stipulation, and given notice of the damages claimed, before they removed or sold the stock from the place of destination. In this case, the suit was brought by appellee to recover damages for injury done to live stock, which he had shipped on the company’s road under a contract containing a stipulation such as is stated in the preceding section. He did not comply with the stipulation by giving the notice thereby required. The court was requested to instruct the jury, in substance, the law as stated in the preceding section, which it refused to do, and appellee recovered judgment for damages. *Held,*error.

Reversed and remanded.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00454-CV

IN THE MATTER OF L.F.R.

----------

FROM THE 323RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant entered a plea of true to delinquent conduct—aggravated 

robbery; the trial court adjudicated him delinquent.2 After a disposition hearing, 

the trial court ordered Appellant committed to the Texas Juvenile Justice 

Department (TJJD) for an indeterminate sentence. In a single issue, Appellant 

argues that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the trial

court’s findings under Texas Family Code section 54.04(i)(1), subsections (A), 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2Appellant does not appeal from the adjudication order.
2

(B), and (C). Subsection (B) requires the trial court to find, before committing a 

juvenile to TJJD, that reasonable efforts were made to prevent or eliminate the 

need for the juvenile’s removal from the home and to make it possible for the 

juvenile to return to the juvenile’s home. Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 54.04(i)(1)(B)

(West Supp. 2012). Although the trial court included the required statutory 

findings in its disposition order, the State concedes––and we agree––that there 

is no evidence in the record supporting a section 54.04(i)(1)(B) finding that 

reasonable efforts were made to prevent or eliminate the need for the juvenile’s 

removal from the home and to make it possible for the juvenile to return to the 

juvenile’s home. See In re A.D., 287 S.W.3d 356, 367 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 

2009, pet. denied) (holding that evidence did not support trial court’s findings 

under section 54.04(i) and remanding for a new disposition hearing); In re J.S., 

993 S.W.2d 370, 374–75 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.) (same); In re 

K.L.C., 972 S.W.2d 203, 206–07 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1998, no pet.) (same); 

In re A.S., 954 S.W.2d 855, 862–63 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1997, no pet.) (same). 

We sustain Appellant’s sole issue, reverse the trial court’s disposition order, and 

remand the case to the trial court for a new disposition hearing. See Tex. Fam. 

Code Ann. § 56.01(i) (providing that appellate court may remand an order that it 

reverses for further proceedings by the trial court).

SUE WALKER

JUSTICE

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ. 
3

DELIVERED: May 2, 2013
#### STATE ex rel. James R. HIGH v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-2649.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

In re High, James R.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial *934Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. I, Nos. 95-6175, 01-3037; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-KH-774.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7187]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Imagining the Past in France, 1250-1500,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, CA, from on or about November 16, 2010, until on or about February 6, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: September 22, 2010.

Ann Stock,

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-24300 Filed 9-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1932-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for State of Kansas (FEMA-1932-DR), dated August 10, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 20, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Michael R. Scott, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of William J. Doran III as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

                        (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance                               ( print page 60474)                            (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)                    

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-24498 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,468
<SECURITIES>                                    28,106
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,798
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (550)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,377
<PP&E>                                          17,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,340)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,193
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        72,968
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,069
<SALES>                                         22,090
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,090
<CGS>                                            4,242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,464
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   550
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 436
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,633)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.78)
        

</TABLE>
#### W. T. Gann v. J. A. Shaw & Son.

(No. 3047.)

Appeal from Williamson County.

Opinion by

Will-son, J.

§ 255. *Admission in answer of cause of 'action; effect of.*Where a defendant, in his answer, admits the plaintiff’s cause of action, such cause of action is no longer an issue in the case, and the plaintiff is not required to introduce evidence in proof thereof, but is entitled to judgment, unless the defendant establishes by evidence some matter of defense. [Hedgepeth v. Robertson, 18 Tex. 858; *Ante*§ 1.]

§•256. *Burden of proof .*Where a defendant pleads in avoidance of a contract sued upon and, in reconvention, the burden of proof is upon him to establish such defenses. [W. & W. Con. Rep. §§ 186, 260, 1178.]

*197June 14, 1884.

§ 257. *Rescission of contract.*A court of equity will not rescind a contract unless fraud appear, or there has been a plain and palpable mistake affecting the very substance of the subject-matter of the contract. [W. & W. Con. Rep. § 1309.]

§ 258. *Same; fraud.*Every misrepresentation in regard to anything which is a material inducement to á. sale, which is made to deceive, and which actually does deceive, the vendee, is fraud, and vitiates the contract. [Wintz v. Morrison, 17 Tex. 372; W. & W. Con. Rep. §§ 4, 1289.] In this case, in order to make good the defense of fraud pleaded by appellees, and entitle them to a rescission of the contract, it was necessary for them to show by evidence: 1. That appellant made false representations to them in regard to the property sold them, as alleged in their petition. 2. That such representations were in regard to something which was a material inducement to the sale. 3. That they believed and relied upon such representations, and wore induced thereby to make the contract. 4. That upon discovering the fraud they promptly, within a reasonable time, demanded a rescission of the contract. [2 Pars, on Con. 921 et seq.] The burden of proving these matters to the satisfaction of the jury, by a preponderance of evidence, devolved upon appellees, and until they had discharged this burden they were not entitled to a rescission of the contract. The charge of the court did not present to the jury the law of the case.

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 99


Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC


Arthur  Andersen LLP has  represented to USOL Holdings,  Inc. that its audit was
subject  to  Andersen's  quality  control  system  for the U.S.  accounting  and
auditing  practice  to provide  reasonable  assurance  that the  engagement  was
conducted  in  compliance  with  professional   standards  and  that  there  was
appropriate   continuity  of  Andersen   personnel  working  on  the  audit  and
availability  of national  office  consultation.  Availability  of  personnel at
foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen is not relevant to this audit.
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1714 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To clarify the boundaries of Coastal Barrier Resources 

System Clam Pass Unit FL–64P. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

HR 1714 RFS

1 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN COASTAL BAR2 RIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAPS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map subtitled ‘‘FL–64P’’, re4 lating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System unit des5 ignated as Coastal Barrier Resources System Clam Pass 

6 Unit FL–64P, that is included in the set of maps entitled 

7 ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ and referred to in 

8 section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

9 U.S.C. 3503(a)), is hereby replaced by another map relat10 ing to that unit entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources Sys11 tem Clam Pass Unit, FL–64P’’ and dated July 21, 2005 

12 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

13 shall keep the map referred to in subsection (a) on file 

14 and available for inspection in accordance with section 

15 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 

16 3503(b)). 

Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 

By ROBERT F. REEVES, 

Deputy Clerk. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS