alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24963]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-2891-000]


Elektrisola Inc.; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

September 29, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Elektrisola, Inc.'s application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 19, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ddbd8cfded2f3f1f4f3f8cee8ededf2efe9ddfbf8effeb3faf2eb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c68083948589a8aaafa8a395b3b6b6a9b4b286a0a3b4a5e8a1a9b0">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24963 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John P. COLLINS.

No. 2011-KK-0122.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

In re Collins, John F.; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ascension, Ascension Parish Court No. 442603; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 2250.

Denied.
#### Maland SILVIO-SWART v. Legene LETT, Tanya Lett, Jerome N. Terry and Horace Mann Insurance Company.

No. 2011-CC-0410.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2011.

In re Silvio-Swart, Maland; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 2009-13382; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 1891.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR
ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10-K.  
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                         0001035418
<NAME>                                       TELEHUB COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1
<CURRENCY>                                       dollars
       
<S>                           <C>                       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-mos                    
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998  
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1998   
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.000     
<CASH>                                        36,727,589     
<SECURITIES>                                           0     
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,207,647     
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,093,594     
<INVENTORY>                                            0     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              43,021,085     
<PP&E>                                        26,325,839     
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5,263,584   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                70,409,776     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         13,001,917     
<BONDS>                                       67,490,760   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0   
<PREFERRED>                                        3,500
<COMMON>                                          12,634     
<OTHER-SE>                                    17,377,311  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  17,393,445     
<SALES>                                                0     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,407,087     
<CGS>                                                  0   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 40,215,031   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              23,959,914     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            10,177,527   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (65,945,385)    
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (65,945,385)     
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0 
<NET-INCOME>                                 (65,945,385)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (5.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (5.21)
                                       
           


                            

</TABLE>
857 A.2d 181

#### Anthony WALLACE, Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION PAROLE, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 12, 2004.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of July, 2004. Probable jurisdiction is noted and the order appealed is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Journal Register Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 29, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
M. Jelenic, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robert M. Jelenic

Robert M. Jelenic
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
March 27, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Journal Register Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1620** 

In R e: ANDRE D. WHITFIELD , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

. (3:07

- cr - 00300

- HEH

- 1)

Submitted : September 23, 2016 Decided: October 4, 2016

Before GREGORY , Chief Judge , and KING and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Andre D. Whitfield, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Andre Whitfield, a federal prisoner, filed an original 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition, challenging his various convictions on the ground that the district court lacked jurisdiction over the criminal matter. We ordinarily decline to entertain an original § 2241 petition, and this case presents no reason to depart from this general rule. Further, we find that the interest of justice would not be served by transferring the matter to the appropriate district court, see 28 U.S.C. § 1631 ( 2012); Fed. R. App. P. 22(a), as Whitfield previously filed a
§ 2241 petition in the district court raising the same claim that he does in th is court . We therefore deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the petition. We dispense with oral argument beca use the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. We deny the motion for summary disposition.
PETITION DISMISSED
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1"> The People of the State of New York, <br><br>against<br><br>Arkeny Olivero, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Ann E. Scherzer, J.), rendered February 29, 2016, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of harassment in the second degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Ann E. Scherzer, J.), rendered February 29, 2016, affirmed.</p><p>Defendant's contention that the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to support his conviction because the testimony of the complaining witness was incredible as a matter of law is unpreserved for appellate review, since defendant did not specify that ground in his motion to dismiss at trial (<i>see</i> CPL 470.05[2]; <i>People v Gray</i>, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]; <i>People v Torres, </i>219 AD2d 565 [1995],<i> lv denied </i>87 NY2d 851 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (<i>see People v Contes</i>, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of second-degree harassment (<i>see </i>Penal Law ยง 240.26[1]). Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses (<i>see People v Gaimari</i>, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal (<i>see People v Bleakley</i>, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]), and should not be disturbed unless manifestly erroneous and so plainly unjustified by the evidence that rejection is required in the interest of justice (<i>see People v Bartley</i>, 219 AD2d 566, 567 [1995], <i>lv denied </i>87 NY2d 898 [1995]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5]). Defendant's course of conduct supports the inference that he struck the victim with requisite intent to "harass, annoy or alarm" (Penal Law ยง 240.26).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: February 20, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
(No. 333-167388, 333-157417, 333-140238 and 333-104105) on Form S-8
and Registration Statements (No. 333-166277, 333-148779, 333-146691 and
333-138405) on Form S-3 of Senesco Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiary
of our report dated September 28, 2010 relating to our audits of the
consolidated financial statements, which appear in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Senesco Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiary for the year
ended June 30, 2010.




/s/
MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP


New York,
New York




September 28,
2010
#### Carlos ASPIAZU, Appellant, v. Christina Aspiazu RINGEL, Appellee.

No. 5D10-1059.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Jan. 21, 2011.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 18, 2011.

Carlos Aspiazu, Orlando, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Aspiazu appeals the entry of a final judgment of injunction for protection against domestic violence. Because no transcript of the lower court proceedings was provided, the record is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. The lower court’s determination is therefore affirmed. *See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee,*377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).

AFFIRMED.

LAWSON, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1556 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage 

penalty on the deduction for interest on student loans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2007 

Mr. TERRY (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. SESSIONS, Mrs. 

BONO, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. 

MCHUGH, Mr. REGULA, Mr. SIMPSON, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. 

GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. GOHMERT, 

Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. POE, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. MCCAUL of 

Texas, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. PATRICK

J. MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. JORDAN of Ohio, and Mr. PEARCE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate 

the marriage penalty on the deduction for interest on 

student loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Married Student Debt 

5 Relief Act of 2007’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1556 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF MARRIAGE PENALTY IN DEDUC2 TION FOR INTEREST ON STUDENT LOANS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 221 of 

4 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to general 

5 rule for maximum deduction) is amended to read as fol6 lows: 

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.— 

8 ‘‘(A) GENERAL RULE.—The amount al9 lowed as a deduction under subsection (a) shall 

10 not exceed $2,500. 

11 ‘‘(B) SPECIAL RULE FOR JOINT RE12 TURN.—In the case of a husband and wife— 

13 ‘‘(i) who make a joint return for the 

14 taxable year, and 

15 ‘‘(ii) each of whom is the obligor on a 

16 qualified education loan for the qualified 

17 education expenses of the husband or wife, 

18 as the case may be, 

19 subparagraph (A) shall be applied separately 

20 with respect to the husband and the wife, ex21 cept that not more than $2,500 of interest ex22 pense may be taken into account under this sec23 tion with respect to each of the husband, the 

24 wife, and all dependents.’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1556 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2006. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
#### John W. DUFFIELD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-4712.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 27, 2010.

John W. Duffield, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. *See Baker v. State,*878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).

' WOLF, ROBERTS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael PETITTO.

No. 2011-KK-2331.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Petitto, Michael; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 703544; to the *1206Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW1511.

Denied.

KNOLL and CLARK, JJ., would grant.
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 906**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Highwoods Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Fritsch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ EDWARDJ.FRITSCH                                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward J. FritschPresident and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| March 2, 2008                                |   |
856 A.2d 42

#### In the Matter of John P. GROSS.

No. 918 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 29, 2004.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2004, John P. Gross having been disbarred from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated January 21, 2004; the said John P. Gross having been directed on May 6, 2004, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that John P. Gross is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00375

- CR

Gregorio BARRERA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR9166

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED June 12, 2019.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7205 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7205

 To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to eliminate any August 
 recess for the House of Representatives until the House has approved 
        all annual appropriation bills for the next fiscal year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 30, 2018

  Mr. Arrington (for himself and Mr. Kilmer) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to 
the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to eliminate any August 
 recess for the House of Representatives until the House has approved 
        all annual appropriation bills for the next fiscal year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Budget No Recess Act''.

SEC. 2. HOUSE APPROVAL OF REGULAR APPROPRIATION BILLS.

    Section 309 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 640) 
is amended by inserting ``or August'' after ``July''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Arthur J. HANDY aka Arthur G. Handy aka Arthur James Handy aka Arthor James Handy aka Arth Handy.

No. 2011-K-0081.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 2007 CR 115497; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-625.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET OF JOURNAL REGISTER COMPANY AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND
THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                               8,542
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                       62,876    
<ALLOWANCES>                         4,632   
<INVENTORY>                          8,440   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    81,878   
<PP&E>                             230,160   
<DEPRECIATION>                     130,182   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     671,869   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               50,124   
<BONDS>                            765,000   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0   
<PREFERRED>                              0   
<COMMON>                               484   
<OTHER-SE>                        (225,797)  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       671,869   
<SALES>                                  0   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   426,780   
<CGS>                                    0   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      244,822   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    23,844   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     4,464   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  45,465   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     73,746   
<INCOME-TAX>                        28,112   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 45,634   
<DISCONTINUED>                           0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      4,495   
<CHANGES>                                0   
<NET-INCOME>                        41,139   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.85
                                   
                                   
                                   
                                 



</TABLE>