alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 60436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24589]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Interim Change to the Military Freight Traffic Unified Rules 
Publication (MFTURP) No. 1

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

SUMMARY: The Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command 
(SDDC) is providing notice that it is releasing an interim change to 
the MFTURP No. 1 on October 1, 2010. The interim change adds Item 180, 
Rail In-Transit Visibility (Rail ITV) Reporting, to Section C of the 
MFTURP No. 1.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments to Publication and Rules Manager, Strategic 
Business Directorate, Business Services, 1 Soldier Way, Building 1900W, 
ATTN: SDDC-OPM, Scott AFB, 62225. Request for additional information 
may be sent by e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#adcec5ccc983d983dddfc4dbc8d9d9edd8de83ccdfc0d483c0c4c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="06656e676228722876746f706372724673752867746b7f286b6f6a">[email protected]</span></a> or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6403010b1603014a05080d012411174a0516091d4a090d08"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3d4d6dcc1d4d69dd2dfdad6f3c6c09dd2c1deca9ddedadf">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Chad Privett, (618) 220-6901, or 
Mr. George Alie, (618) 220-5870.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Reference: Military Freight Traffic Unified Rules Publications 
(MFTURP) No. 1.
    Background: The MFTURP No. 1 governs the purchase of surface 
freight transportation in the Continental United States (CONUS) by DoD 
using Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) exempt transportation 
service contracts.
    Rail ITV data is now purchased from a contractor, along with rail 
ITV services. Some of the data is transmitted to the Global Tracking 
Network (GTN), but most of it resides in the contractor's database and 
is accessible only using the contractor's software. When contracts are 
rebid, the former contractor is tasked to transfer recent data to the 
new contractor. Section C, Item 180, ensures this transfer takes place.
    Miscellaneous: This publication, as well as the other SDDC 
publications, can be accessed via the SDDC Web site at: http://www.sddc.army.mil/Public/Global%20Cargo%20Distribution/Domestic/Publications/.

Henry Brooks,
Chief, SDDC, G9, Business Execution.
[FR Doc. 2010-24589 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### TRICIA SCALZI *v.*JOSEPH HESSE ET AL.

(AC 22911)

Foti, Bishop and Dupont, Js.

Submitted on briefs March 21

officially released April 8, 2003

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Earton Lynn SMITH.

No. 2010-KO-2384.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

In re Smith, Earton Lynn; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 168,438; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,-430-KA.

Denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 5, 2018

t1128 

# Order

Clerk December 5, 2018

158396

In re PAROLE OF FREDERICK WILKINS

_________________________________________

MONROE COUNTY PROSECUTING

ATTORNEY,

Appellee,

v SC: 158396

COA: 344426

Monroe CC: 18

- 140703

- AP

FREDERICK WILKINS,

Appellee,

and

PAROLE BOARD,

Intervenor

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 1, 2018 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this c ase to the Court of Appeals for

consideration as on leave granted, and we DIRECT that court to decide this case on an

expedited basis.
#### STATE ex rel. Tyree YOUNG v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1246.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re Young, Tyree; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 370037; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 0258.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Louis EARLYCUTT, et al.

No. 2011-KK-2634.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 5, 2011.

In re Earlycutt, Louis; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. K, No. 501-945; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1336.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J., would grant.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ian HUGHES.

No. 2010-KK-2777.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 4, 2011.

In re Hughes, Ian; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, Nos. 10-1711, 10-1712; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-K-881.

Denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15


                         ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                 REGARDING INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REVIEW REPORT


The Board of Directors
Northfield Laboratories Inc.:

With respect to registration statements of Form S-8 of Northfield Laboratories
Inc., we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated
December 14, 1999 related to our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                                /s/ KPMG LLP
                                                -------------------------
                                                    KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
January 12, 2000
#### Charles THOMAS, a/k/a, Clemmon Robinson, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-1372.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 7, 2010.

*117Charles Thomas, pro se, for Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Bryan Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, charged and in custody in another Florida county, filed a demand for speedy trial in the Circuit Court for Su-wannee County relating to case number 06-391-CF. When the matter was not brought to trial, petitioner first filed a motion for discharge and then, in December 2009, he filed a notice of expiration of speedy trial. Having obtained no relief from circuit court, petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition from this court.

We find that petitioner is entitled to relief. Although he had apparently not yet been taken into custody on the Suwan-nee County matter, he was nevertheless entitled to demand speedy trial under rule 3.191(b). *See Brown v. State,*798 So.2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). When petitioner timely sought relief by filing a notice of expiration of speedy trial time under rule 3.191(p) and the matter was ignored by the trial court and the prosecutor, petitioner became entitled to discharge.

Accordingly, we grant the petition and direct that the circuit court enter an order discharging petitioner from the pending charges in Suwannee County case number 06-391-CF.

PETITION GRANTED.

BENTON, THOMAS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 190 (Friday, October 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60749-60750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24665]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C.

[[Page 60750]]

1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, 
or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, 
including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or 
through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is 
listed in Sec. [thinsp]225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that 
the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and 
permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than October 18, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Raton Capital Corporation, Raton, New Mexico; to continue to 
engage de novo in lending activities, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) 
of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 28, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-24665 Filed 9-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5      
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ABR
INFORMATION SERVICES, INC. FIRST QUARTER AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      34,144,270
<SECURITIES>                               110,471,406
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,082,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                   130,913
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           154,574,277
<PP&E>                                      48,091,353
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,793,911
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             231,440,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,756,502
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       273,870
<OTHER-SE>                                 197,378,966
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               231,440,755
<SALES>                                     15,234,938
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,234,938
<CGS>                                        8,824,316
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,675,148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,432,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,168,250
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,667,290
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,500,960
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,500,960
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
627 A.2d 1130

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ADEL R. MERCADO.

January 28, 1993.

Petition for certification is granted, and the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily affirmed insofar as it remands the matter to the Law Division, the remand proceedings to be in accordance with *State v. Shaw,*131 *N.J.*1, 618 A.2d 294 (1993). The remainder of that portion of the judgment that is before that Court on the petition for certification is summarily reversed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Steven Mark “Marc” ANDERSON.

No. 2010-K-2472.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

In re Anderson, Steven Mark “Marc”; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. CR-120075; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-0256.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Zannie NEAL v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1862.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Neal, Zannie; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. 0, No. 98-3238; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 08-WR-926.

Denied.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MakeMusic, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Alan G. Shuler, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







July 27, 2006/s/ Alan G. ShulerChief Financial
                Officer
#### In re LOUISIANA JUDICIARY COMMISSION NO. 10-7539.

No. 2010-O-2583.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2011.

In re Johnson, Elfrida W.; —Plaintiff; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s action dated January 7, 2011; Judiciary Commission of Louisiana, No. 10-7539.

Denied.
NUMBER 13-23-00469-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

ASHLEY GALVAN, Appellant,

 v.

JASON WENDEL AND AMBER 

QUARLES, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 329th District Court 

of Wharton County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Peña 

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña 

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On December 5, 2023, the Clerk 

of the Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was due 

on November 27, 2023, and that the deputy district clerk, Meagan Morales, had notified 

this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the 

clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could 
2

be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 

(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the 

date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Appellant has failed to comply with a notice from the clerk requiring a response or 

other action within the time specified; accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of 

prosecution. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).

L. ARON PEÑA JR. 

Justice

Delivered and filed on the 

7th day of March, 2024.
News United States Air Force
 U-2 returns to Red FlagPublished July 25, 2016
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Mike Slater
                **NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, (AFNS) --**
                The 9th Reconnaissance Wing is taking part in Red Flag 16-3, which is nothing new, as the wing regularly supports Red Flag exercises. What makes this Red Flag different is they are operating from Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, and not from their home station of Beale AFB, California.“It’s been over 20 years since we’ve had a chance to pack everything up and come out here,” said Senior Master Sgt. David Hatch, the U-2 maintenance superintendent. “It’s not often we actually get to pick up and operate from an exercise location, so it really gives us a chance to shake off the rust.”At any given moment, day or night, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, there is probably a 9th RW aircraft flying an operational mission somewhere in the world. That kind of global reach takes practice.“We normally operate from already established forward operating locations. It’s a rare opportunity to come out and test this skill set,” Hatch said. “It’s like anything else, if you don’t use it, you lose it.”The U-2s from the 9th RW provide intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance in Korea, the Balkans, Afghanistan and Iraq. When requested, they also provide peacetime reconnaissance in support of disaster relief from floods, earthquakes and forest fires, as well as search and rescue operations. These mission sets sometimes require being self-sufficient at remote locations, where support is limited.“In my prior experience, I deployed where we already had everything in place,” said Senior Airman Logan Lasko, a U-2 maintainer. “This has given me an opportunity to see just how much equipment we have to bring to be self-sufficient. It surprised me a little.”Red Flag has given Lasko and his co-workers the chance to experience firsthand what operating out of a bare base may be like.“It’s a great opportunity to take part in Red Flag,” Lasko said. “I’ll know what to expect when we’re sent out somewhere and be more mentally prepared to deal with the challenges.”Hatch said the experienced gained was not limited to mobility.“We’re here supporting operations, but we have also received some exercise injects. So, it gives our Airmen a chance to practice contested, degraded operations,” Hatch said.The U-2 will continue to fly in support of Red Flag 16-3 until the exercise ends July 29.red flag 



exercise 



9th Reconnaissance Wing 



nellis afb 



Nevada 



U-2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**The following certification isfurnished pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and ExchangeCommission and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liabilityof that section.  Such certificationshall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to theextent that such certification is specifically incorporated by reference by theregistrant.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MetroOne Telecommunications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, James F. Hensel, ChiefExecutive Officer and William K. Hergenhan, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:     March 19,  2008 |   | /s/  James F. Hensel      |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                                                    |   | James F. Hensel           |
|                                                    |   | Chief Executive Officer   |
|                                                    |   |                      |
|                                                    |   |                      |
|                                                    |   | /s/  William K. Hergenhan |
|                                                    |   | William K. Hergenhan      |
|                                                    |   | Senior Vice President,    |
|                                                    |   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,173,555
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,566,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    287,072
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,120,916
<PP&E>                                      75,863,941
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,726,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              74,622,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,879,548
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,095
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,217,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                74,622,133
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            88,479,419
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               87,735,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,124,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,620,145
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,852,841
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,767,304
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,767,304
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68
        

</TABLE>