alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### D. Schwartz v. S. Liberman & Co.

(No. 3021.)

Appeal from Tarrant County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 289. *Amendment to article V of constitution; tulien it became operative; terms of county court; poiver oj commissioners’ court to change.*The judgment appealed,, from was rendered at a term of the county court, beginning on first Monday in September, 1883, being the third day of said month, and ending on the twenty-sixth day of said month. There was no authority of law for holding a term of said court for civil business, to commence on the first Monday in September, 1883. Under the law then in force, the September terms of county courts were fixed to begin on the *-third*Monday in that month, and the commissioners’ court had no power to change the *221time of holding said courts. .[Const, art. V, § 17; E. S. art. 1173.] It was not until the amendment to article V of the constitution became operative, that the commissioners’ courts were clothed with the power to change the time fixed by law for holding the regular terms of the county courts for civil business. [Amendment, art. V, Const.; Acts 18th Leg. p. 134.] That amendment did not become operative until the fortieth day *after*the election at which it was adopted. [R. S. art. 1710; Const, art. XVII.] The election occurred on the second Tuesday in August, 1883, which was the fourteenth day of that month. .[Acts 18th Leg. p. 134, § 2.] It was, therefore, not until the 23d day of September, 1883, that said amendment went into effect. It was not until then that it was authoritatively adopted. [Sewell v. The State, 15 Tex. Ct. App. 56; Wilson v. The State, id. 150; Real v. The People, 42 N. Y. 270.] It being apparent that the term of court at "which the judgment was rendered was held without authority of law, the judgment is a nullity.

April 26, 1884.

(Note.-*- On a motion for rehearing it was made tp appear that the transcript in the foregoing cause did not correctly state the time of the holding of the court, and that,, in fact, the court was held at the time prescribed by law. The motion for rehearing was granted,, and, there being no error in the judgment, it was affirmed.—Reporter.) "

Reversed and -remanded.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     Three months ended          Six months ended
                                        September 30,              September 30,    
                                      1998          1997         1998          1997   
                                  ----------     ---------    ----------    ----------
<S>                            <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Net income as reported . . . .    $1,061,000      $984,000    $2,060,000    $1,770,000
                                  ==========     =========    ==========    ==========
                                 
BASIC:
    Weighted average number of 
      common shares outstanding    3,261,350     3,219,591     3,264,601     3,204,895
                                  ==========     =========    ==========    ==========

  Basic net income per share.          $0.33         $0.31         $0.63         $0.55
                                  ==========     =========    ==========    ==========


DILUTED: 
  Common and common equivalent shares
  outstanding:
    Weighted average number of 
      common shares outstanding    3,261,350     3,219,591     3,264,601     3,204,895
    Common stock equivalents from 
      options computed on the 
      treasury-stock method using 
      the average fair market 
      value of common stock 
      outstanding during the 
      period . . . . . . . . .       124,499       165,299       135,423       157,639
                                  ----------     ---------    ----------    ----------
    Shares used in the 
      computation. . . . . . .     3,385,799     3,384,890     3,400,024     3,362,534
                                  ==========     =========    ==========    ==========

 Diluted net income per 
    share. . . . . . . . . . .         $0.31         $0.29         $0.61         $0.53
                                  ==========     =========    ==========    ==========

</TABLE>
<TABLE>
                                                                                     Exhibit 12(b)


                                     SOUTH JERSEY GAS COMPANY
                         Calculation of Ratio of Earnings To Fixed Charges
                           Plus Preferred Security Dividend Requirements
                                          (In Thousands)


<CAPTION>
                                                   Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
                                     ------------------------------------------------------------
                                         2000        1999        1998        1997        1996
                                     ------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                      <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Net Income                               $21,779     $20,382     $14,822     $19,898     $19,215

Income Taxes, Net                         16,651      15,455      12,256      11,559      10,627

Fixed Charges*                            21,181      20,949      19,235      18,103      19,574
Preferred Securities - Dividends           3,074       3,084       3,088       2,102         174
                                     ------------------------------------------------------------
        Sub-Total                         24,255      24,033      22,323      20,205      19,748
                                     ------------------------------------------------------------
Capitalized Interest                         (24)       (390)       (167)       (107)       (114)
                                     ------------------------------------------------------------
Total Available for Coverage             $62,661     $59,480     $49,234     $51,555     $49,476
                                     ============================================================


Total Available                             2.6x        2.5x        2.2x        2.6x        2.5x
-------------------------------------
Fixed Charges and Preferred
  Securities - Dividends


<FN>

*  Fixed charges consist of interest charges (rentals are not material).

</FN>
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Certification of Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I,Stephen A. Gorgol, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ofVista Medical Technologies Inc. 

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport; 

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: 

 

a.     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared; 

 

b.     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c.     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

 

a.     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 
| Date: March 30, 2004 |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |   |
|                      |   | /s/ Stephen A. Gorgol |
|                      |   | **Stephen A. Gorgol  Chief Financial Officer** |

 

----
#### Norman J. CHENEVERT v. Gwen DUFRENE.

No. 2011-CC-0635.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2011.

In re Dufrene, Gwen; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 568,791; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 1957.

Stay denied; writ denied.
762 A.2d 1084

#### Jorge F. FERRER, M.D., Petitioner, v. TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Michael Aiken, Provost, Barry S. Cooperman, Vice-Provost for Research, Edwin Andrews, Dean of School of Veterinary Medicine, and Jeffrey Roberts, Associate Dean of School of Veterinary Medicine, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Dec. 7, 2000.

*521
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the following two issues:

1. Whether the Superior Court erred in finding that petitioner did not sustain compensable damages and thus was unable to establish that he suffered harm from the University’s breach of contract.

2. Whether the Superior Court erred in finding that the jury instructions at issue were insufficient and would warrant a new trial.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Public Law 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave, NW., Washington, DC.

*Docket Number:*                     10-022.                     *Applicant:*                     Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, VA 23298-0551.                     *Instrument:*                     Electron Microscope.                     *Manufacturer:*                     FEI Company, the Netherlands.                     *Intended Use: See*                     notice at 75 FR 53271, August 31, 2010.                     *Comments:*                     None received.                     *Decision:*                     Approved.                     *Reasons:*                     The instrument will be used to investigate the three dimensional structure of biological macromolecules, which will be observed under cryogenic conditions. We know of no instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described above, for such purposes as this is intended to be used, that was being manufactured in the United States at the time of its order.                

Dated: September 28, 2010.

Gregory W. Campbell,

Acting Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-24834 Filed 10-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 -0643 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JENNIFER RENEE SKAW,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 9, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 4 2022

04/04/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0643
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kenneth Ray BILBO, II.

No. 2011-KO-0454.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 2011.

In re Bilbo II, Kenneth Ray; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 11903-07; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-518.

Denied.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A of Senesco Technologies, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the
undersigned, Joel Brooks, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)           The
Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Senesco
Technologies, Inc.





Dated:  October
      25, 2010
              
              /s/ Joel Brooks *Joel
      BrooksChief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer(principal
      financial and accounting officer)





*  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 10.2

              Schedule of Additional Employee Retention Agreements

         In addition to the Employee Retention Agreement included as Exhibit
10.1, Goshen Savings Bank has executed Employee Retention Agreements with three
additional employees. With the exception of the name and address of each
individual, all the Employee Retention Agreements are identical and there are no
material details which differ from the agreement included as Exhibit 10.1. In
accordance with SEC Rule 12b-31 and Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation S-K,
the following schedule identifies the three other employees.

1.  Barbara Carr
2.  Jennifer Terpstra
3.  Richard C. Burch
856 A.2d 36

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Charles C. STAROPOLI, Respondent.

No. 925 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 8, 2004.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2004, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated April 1, 2004, it is hereby

ORDERED that Charles C. Staropoli be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year retroactive to July 1, 2003, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
#### TORBERT LAND COMPANY, L.L.C. v. Tommy MONTGOMERY and Lillian Montgomery.

No. 2010-C-2009.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 17, 2010.

In re Torbert Land Co. L.L.C.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Pointe Coupee, 18th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 41,328; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 CA 1955.

Denied.

JOHNSON and KNOLL, JJ., would grant.
<PAGE>

OWOSSO CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Three Months Ended                  Six Months Ended
                                                             ----------------------------        ---------------------------
                                                              April 30,          May 2,           April 30,          May 2,
                                                                2000              1998               2000             1998
<S>                                                          <C>              <C>                <C>               <C>
BASIC:
Net income (loss) available for common stockholders          $ 284,000        $ 1,026,000        $ (266,000)       $ 623,000
                                                             =========        ===========        ==========        =========

Weighted average number
          of common shares outstanding                       5,846,000          5,826,000         5,838,000        5,821,000
                                                             =========        ===========        ==========        =========

Basic earnings (loss) per common share                          $ 0.05             $ 0.18        $    (0.05)       $   0.11
                                                             =========        ===========        ==========        =========



DILUTED:

Net income (loss) available for common stockholders          $ 284,000        $ 1,026,000        $ (266,000)       $ 623,000
                                                             =========        ===========        ==========        =========

Weighted average number
          of common shares outstanding                       5,846,000          5,826,000         5,838,000        5,821,000

Dilutive effect of stock options                                 9,000             15,000                --           24,000
                                                             ---------        -----------        ----------        ---------

Weighted average number of shares outstanding                5,855,000          5,841,000         5,838,000        5,845,000
                                                             =========        ===========        ==========        =========

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share                     $    0.05        $      0.18        $    (0.05)       $    0.11
                                                             =========        ===========        ==========        =========

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<RESTATED>

<S>                          <C>                <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS              6-MOS           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1997        DEC-31-1997      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>               JAN-01-1997        JAN-01-1997      JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                 MAR-31-1997        JUN-30-1997      SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                            10,507             13,533            6,266
<SECURITIES>                           0                  0                0
<RECEIVABLES>                     45,751             50,790           62,554
<ALLOWANCES>                       2,200              2,300            2,200
<INVENTORY>                            0                  0                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  63,762             72,797           79,336
<PP&E>                            75,039             75,974           78,561
<DEPRECIATION>                    (7,810)            (8,655)          (9,871)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   201,142            213,585          224,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            (46,541)           (50,167)         (48,748)
<BONDS>                         (107,173)          (114,797)         (63,027)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            (31,800)           (31,498)               0
<PREFERRED>                            0                  0                0
<COMMON>                             (21)               (21)            (119)
<OTHER-SE>                       (12,601)           (14,625)        (109,688)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    (201,142)          (213,585)        (224,055)
<SALES>                                0                  0                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 (64,235)           (71,939)         (81,946)
<CGS>                                  0                  0                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     59,498             66,038           74,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0                  0                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     146                150               51
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 2,629              2,659            1,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (2,110)            (3,259)          (5,673)
<INCOME-TAX>                         786              1,270            2,212
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0                  0                0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0                  0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0                  0              537
<CHANGES>                              0                  0                0
<NET-INCOME>                      (1,241)            (1,884)          (2,846)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (0.09)             (0.30)            0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.09)             (0.30)            0.15



</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Arthur W. CASTILLE.

No. 2011-KP-2257.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

In re Castille, Arthur W.; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 57940; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW 10-01319.

Denied.