alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,851
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     71,308
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               137,061
<PP&E>                                         210,722
<DEPRECIATION>                                (25,598)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 474,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,981
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     127,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   474,090
<SALES>                                        212,032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               212,032
<CGS>                                          165,398
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  165,398
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,899
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,457
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,428
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,029
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,029
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10KSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         267,943
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  219,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,080
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               496,347
<PP&E>                                       7,794,596
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,957,391
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,503,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,257,323
<BONDS>                                      7,114,238
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,032
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,076,707)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,503,758
<SALES>                                      1,153,829
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,231,495
<CGS>                                        1,630,594
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,086,481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,113
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             455,295
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,317,394)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,317,394)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,317,394)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.66)


</TABLE>
#### Octavio P. LLERENA, Petitioner, v. SPILLIS, CANDELA & PARTNERS, INC., and One Beacon Insurance Group, Respondent.

No. 1D11-0469.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 9, 2011.

James A. Walker of the Law Offices of James A. Walker, P.A., Miami, for Petitioner.

Marjorie Gadarian' Graham of Marjorie Gadarian Graham, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for Respondents.

*736PER CURIAM.

DENIED. *See, e.g., Vazquez v. Wendy’s,*931 So.2d 152, 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); *Fla. Fish & Wildlife Comm’n v. Pringle,*770 So.2d 696, 697 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); *see also, e.g., Dawson v. Clerk of Cir. Ct.-Hillsborough County,*991 So.2d 407, 411 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

DAVIS, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
#### Jean Berton ST. FLEUR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D09-2105.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 21, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 14, 2010.

Jean Berton St. Fleur, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE and SALTER, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order denying a motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because defendant-appellant St. Fleur received a deportation order prior to the announcement of *State v. Chreen,*944 So.2d 208 (Fla.2006), the defendant was not entitled to relief under that decision. *See Markland v. State,*971 So.2d 832 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); *St. Fleur v. State,*840 So.2d 261 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

With regard to the assertion that there was a double jeopardy violation in connection with the defendant’s sentencing, we have taken judicial notice of this court’s file in *St. Fleur v. State,*948 So.2d 769, and conclude that the double jeopardy issue was decided adversely to the defendant in *1382007. *St. Fleur v. State,*948 So.2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).

Affirmed.
#### Bennie David JONES, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph P. PICKELSIMER, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 00-7452.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 2001.

Decided Jan. 17, 2001.

Bennie David Jones, Jr., pro se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Bennie David Jones, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Jones v. Pickelsimer,*No. CA-98-9-3-MU-1 (W-D.N.C. filed Aug. 10, 2000; entered Aug. 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Unassociated Document


    


      Exhibit
10.2.4

      


      Ratification
and Extension Agreement

      THIS Agreement is made and
entered into this 10th day of October, 2008, by and between Millennium Group
Worldwide Incorporated, a Florida corporation with its principal place of
business at 2825 N. 10th
Street, St. Augustine, Florida 32084 ("MGW”), and FRANKLIN AUTO MALL, INC. d/b/a
Champion Chevrolet, Buick, Potomac, GMC with a principal place of business at
1201 Armory Drive, Franklin, Virginia 23851 (hereinafter referred to as
“Franklin Auto”),

       

      WHEREAS,
MGW have entered into a joint venture agreement dated November 16th, 2007 (the
“Prior joint venture Agreement”);

      
WHEREAS,
the Prior joint venture Agreement (in the RECITALS) was conditioned upon
MGW obtaining adequate funding under its Form S-1 Registration, such period of
time having already expired as a function of the registration and review
process;

      
WHEREAS,
both MGW and Franklin Auto, wish to ratify the Prior joint venture Agreement and
extend the period that will satisfy the Recitals Section, Paragraph 4 and 5c
condition as to timing.

      
NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

      


      1.           MGW
and Franklin Auto hereby ratify the Prior Joint Venture Agreement in all
respects;

      


      
        	
                 
      

              	
                2.

              	
                Recitals
      Section, Paragraph 5c relating to timing of funding is extended to no
      later than March 15, 2009, or immediately after the appropriate
      funding is available from the offering;
and

              


      

      


      
        	
                 
      

              	
                3.

              	
                This
      Agreement, together with the Prior Joint Venture Agreement as hereby
      incorporated by reference, constitutes the entire understanding between
      the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and no amendment or
      modification to this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon the parties
      unless made in writing and signed by each
party.

              


      

      IN
WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date
first written above.

      


      MILLENNIUM
GROUP WORLD INCORPORATED

      /s/ Julius Jackson,
Sr.                                                                

      (Signature)

      Julius
Jackson, Sr, President

      


      


      


      FRANKLIN
AUTO, INC.

      


      /s/ James
Hayden                                                                

      (Signature)

      James
Hayden, President
# **Exhibit 32**

# ** **

# **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Gevity HR, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J.Lavington, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Garry J. Welsh, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)          theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  March 16, 2009 |   /s/  Michael J. Lavington |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                        |   Michael  J. Lavington     |
|                        |   Chief  Executive Officer  |
|                        |                                  |
|                        |   /s/  Garry J. Welsh       |
| Dated:  March 16, 2009 |   Garry  J. Welsh           |
|                        |   Chief  Financial Officer  |
|                        |                                  |

 

----
**Exhibit 24.1**

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

The undersigned,                     , herebyauthorizes and appoints William W. Krippaehne, Jr. and David D. Hillard, and each of them, with full power of substitution and resubstitution and full power to act without the other, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent to act in hisname, place and stead and to execute in the name and on behalf of him, individually and in each capacity stated below, and to file, the Annual Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the“Annual Report”), any and all amendments to the Annual Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-factand agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing, ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them or their and his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfullydo or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 25 (Monday, February 8, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 6095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2467]



[[Page 6095]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0885; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-17]


Revision of Area Navigation (RNAV) Route Q-108; Florida

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects an error in the legal description for 
RNAV route Q-108 that was published in the Federal Register on Friday, 
December 11, 2009, Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-17.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, February 11, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace and Rules 
Group, Office of System Operations Airspace and AIM, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 
telephone: (202) 267-8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On December 11, 2009, a final rule was published in the Federal 
Register (74 FR 65687), Airspace Docket No. 09-ASO-17. This rule 
revised Area Navigation (RNAV) Route Q-108 in northern Florida by 
realigning the route structure. In the legal description, the function 
of the four points that make up the route as a ``waypoint'' (WP) or 
``fix'' was inadvertently omitted. This correction adds ``WP'' to 
GADAY, IZZEY and FRNKS, and ``fix'' to HKUNA. Area Navigation Q Routes 
are published in paragraph 2006 of FAA Order 7400.9T signed August 27, 
2009, and effective September 15, 2009, which is incorporated by 
reference in 14 CFR 71.1.

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the legal 
description for RNAV Route Q-108, as published in the Federal Register 
December 11, 2009 (74 FR 65687), page 65688, beginning in column 1, is 
corrected as follows:


Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

* * * * *

Q-108 GADAY to HKUNA [Corrected]

0
By adding `WP' after GADAY, IZZEY, and FRNKS; and adding `fix' after 
HKUNA.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 27, 2010.
Kelly Neubecker,
Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules Group.
[FR Doc. 2010-2467 Filed 2-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
#### Willie Ben HART, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D11-560.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 15, 2011.

Willie Ben Hart, Jr., pro se.

*1287KHOUZAM, Judge.

We reverse the denial of Willie Ben Hart, Jr.’s motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 because the postconviction court erred when it denied the motion as untimely.

On December 18, 2007, Mr. Hart admitted to a violation of probation, and on January 3, 2008, the trial court entered an order revoking Mr. Hart’s probation and sentenced him to fifteen years’ imprisonment. Mr. Hart filed a timely notice of appeal, and on December 2, 2008, this court issued a mandate affirming his judgment and sentence. On December 2, 2010, Mr. Hart filed his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, which the postconviction court denied shortly thereafter.

In denying his motion as untimely, the postconviction court noted that Mr. Hart was sentenced on January 3, 2008, and found that although he filed a direct appeal, he did not specifically challenge the revocation of his probation. The postcon-viction court found that Mr. Hart’s judgment and sentence became final on February 2, 2008, thirty days after being issued. The postconviction court further reasoned that Mr. Hart’s motion of December 2, 2010, was filed outside of the rule 3.850 two-year time limit. *See*Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b). However, while Mr. Hart’s appeal did not specifically dispute the revocation of his probation, it did challenge whether the court erred in accepting his admission to the violation. Therefore, his appeal tolled the finalization of the judgment and sentence entered as a result of the revocation of his probation until the mandate on direct appeal was issued on December 2, 2008. *See Cabrera v. State,*721 So.2d 1190, 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Because Mr. Hart filed his motion on December 2, 2010, he was just within the two-year time limit.

Accordingly, we reverse this order. On remand, the postconviction court is instructed to address Mr. Hart’s claims on the merits.

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
First Amendment to Greer State Bank Amended



 Exhibit 10.1 
 GREER STATE BANK 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT 
 WITH KENNETH M. HARPER 
 First Amendment

 WHEREAS, Greer State Bank (“Company”) and Kenneth M. Harper (“Executive”) established an Amended and Restated
Salary Continuation Agreement on July 31, 2007 (“Agreement”) 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive wish to amend the
Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, Paragraph 7.1 of the Agreement allows for amendment of the Agreement by a written agreement signed by the Company
and the Executive; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive mutually do covenant and agree to make the following amendment to the
Agreement, effective as of December 31, 2008: 
 The First Paragraph of Section 2.4 is deleted and is hereby changed to read as follows: 

 2.4 Change of Control Benefit. Upon Termination of Employment prior to Normal Retirement Age but within two (2) years following
a Change of Control (other than by reason of Disability), the Company shall pay to the Executive the benefit described in this Section 2.4 in lieu of any other benefit under this Agreement. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have caused this First Amendment to the Agreement to be adopted
and this document executed this 30th day of December, 2008. 
  

							
	IN THE PRESENCE OF:	 		 		 	
			
	 /s/ Karen M. Corn
	 		 	 /s/ Kenneth M. Harper

		 		 	Kenneth M. Harper (Executive)
	 /s/ Tammy S. Thompson
	 		 	
		 		 	GREER STATE BANK (Company)
	 /s/ Karen M. Corn
	 		 		 	
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Walter Burch

	 /s/ Tammy S. Thompson
	 		 		 	Walter Burch, Chairman of the Board
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Thefollowing certification is furnished pursuant to the requirements of theSecurities and Exchange Commission and shall not be deemed “filed” for thepurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwisesubject to the liability of that section. Such certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference intoany filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, except to the extent that such certification is specifically incorporatedby reference by the registrant.**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Metro One Telecommunications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Timothy A. Timmins,Chief Executive Officer and Dale N. Wahl, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|  Date: | May 10, 2004 | /s/  Timothy A. Timmins |   |
|-------------|--------------|------------------------------|--------|
|        |         | Timothy A.  Timmins          |
|        |         | President,  Chief Executive  |
|        |         | Officer and  Director        |
|        |         |                         |
|        |         |                         |
|        |         | /s/  Dale N. Wahl       |   |
|        |         | Dale N. Wahl                 |
|        |         | Senior Vice  President,      |
|        |         | Chief  Financial Officer     |
|             |              |                              |        |  |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force

# ACTION:

Notice of Availability (NOA) of a Record of Decision (ROD).

# SUMMARY:

On September 17, 2010, the United States Air Force signed the ROD for the 2005 Base Closure and Realignment (BRAC 2005) directed Beddown and Flight Operations of Remotely Piloted Aircraft at Grand Forks AFB, North Dakota. The ROD states the Air Force decision to implement the mitigated preferred alternative (Alternative C—Southern Restricted Area Creation, Ground-Based Improvements and Personnel Changes—Airspace Scenario 2).

                        The decision was based on matters discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the BRAC Beddown and Flight Operations of Remotely Piloted Aircraft at Grand Forks AFB, North Dakota, inputs from the public and regulatory agencies, and other relevant factors. The Final EIS was made available to the public on July 23, 2010 through a NOA in the                         **Federal Register**                         (Volume 75, Number 141, Page 43161) with a wait period that ended on August 23, 2010. The ROD documents only the decision of the Air Force with respect to the proposed Air Force actions analyzed in the Final EIS. Authority: This NOA is published pursuant to the regulations (40 CFR 1506.6) implementing the provisions of the NEPA of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321,                         *et seq.*) and the Air Force's Environmental Impact Analysis Process (EIAP) (32 CFR 989.21(b) and 989.24(b)(7))                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Doug Allbright, HQ AMC/A7PI, 507 Symington Drive, Scott AFB, IL. 62225 Phone (618) 229-0841, e-mail:                         *earl.allbright@scott.af.mil.*                         20762,                         *AnthonyM.mitchell@pentagon.af.mil.*

Bao-Anh Trinh,

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-24628 Filed 9-30-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-P