alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7143 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7143

   To amend title II of the Social Security Act to modernize social 
           security account numbers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2018

   Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title II of the Social Security Act to modernize social 
           security account numbers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Number Modernization 
Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. PUBLIC LISTING OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 205(c)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)(B)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(iv) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including 
subparagraph (C)(viii) of this paragraph and section 552a of title 5, 
United States Code, the Commissioner of Social Security shall maintain 
a complete public listing of each social security account number that 
has been assigned to any individual at any time.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on October 1, 2028.

SEC. 3. PHASEOUT OF PAPER SOCIAL SECURITY CARDS.

    Section 205(c)(2)(G) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
405(c)(2)(G)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The Commissioner'' and inserting ``For 
        individuals who are issued a social security account number 
        before October 1, 2023, the Commissioner''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following: ``The Commissioner 
        of Social Security may not issue a replacement for the social 
        security card of any individual on or after October 1, 2028.''

SEC. 4. REPORT ON FEDERAL USE OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBERS.

    Not later than January 15, 2021, the Comptroller General of the 
United States shall submit a report to Congress on all uses of the 
social security account number by each Federal agency, which includes 
the citation of any associated requirement (including statutory, 
regulatory, and other requirements). The Comptroller General shall 
submit to Congress a biennial update of such report not later than 
January 15 of the 1st session of each Congress.
                                 <all>
```
#### Christopher S. PUCKETT v. Emily Coleman PUCKETT.

No. 2010-CC-2107.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Puckett, Emily Coleman; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. C, Nos. 06-14298, 07-1175; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-C-0670.

Writ denied.
#### Alfonso ARISTIDES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D10-2053.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 15, 2010.

Aristides Alfonso, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, SHEPHERD, and LAGOA, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order summarily denying Alfonso Aristides’ motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) for additional credit for time served. Because the docket sheet attached to the order on review is insufficient to conclusively show that the Aristides is entitled to no relief for the time he was incarcerated in June 2009, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. *See Parks v. State,*18 So.3d 1199 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the postconviction motion, the court shall attach record excepts, including the most recent sentencing transcript and plea colloquy or any written agreement regarding credit for time served, conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to ... additional ... days of jail time credit.”).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
#### Del Dean DAVID et ux. v. VELSICOL CHEM. CORP. and Wilhelm.

No. 2010-C-2636.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Glaxosmith Kline; Smithkline Beecham Corporation d/b/a; — Defendants); Applying for Reconsideration of this court’s action dated March 9, 2012, Parish of Vermilion, 15th Judicial District Court Div. L, Nos. 82490-L, 84514-1; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Nos. 09-1237, 09-1239.

Not considered. See La. S.Ct. Rule IX, Section 6.

CLARK, J., additionally concurs.
#### W. F. Whittington v. A. L. Butler.

(No. 3297.)

Appeal from Clay County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 7 90. *Special judge of county court; cannot be appointed by consent of parties.*This case purports to have been tried in the lower court by a special judge. As to his appointment, the record recites: “ On this day came the parties to this suit, in person and by attorneys, both plaintiff and defendant, and agree upon A. L. Crane, Esq., a practicing attorney at law, to sit as special judge in this cause, for the' reason that the acting county judge of Olay county is disqualified to try said cause, he having been of counsel in the case; and the said A. L. Crane, having taken the oath required by the laws and constitution of the state of Texas, proceeded to sit as special judge in this cause and try the same.” It may have been permissible under former laws of this state, where the regular judge of a court was disqualified, for the parties to the suit to agree upon a special judge to try the case, but there is no such law in force under our present constitution, with reference to the county court. The constitution authorizes the appointment of such a special judge in the district court [Const, art. V, sec. 11], but with regard to the county court the provision is: “Any cause pending in the county court, which the county judge may be disqualified to try, shall be transferred to the district court of the same county for trial; and where there exists any cause disqualifying the county judge for the trial of a cause, of which the county court has jurisdiction, the district court of such county shall have original jurisdiction of such cause.” [Const, art. V, sec. 16.] In conformity with this provision the statute provides “that, whenever a judge of the county court is disqualified to try any civil case pending in such court, it shall be his duty, on motion of any party to the cause, or of his own motion, by an order entered of record, to re*699move such cause to the district court of his county, to be there tried.” [R. S. art. 1139.] Because the judgment was rendered without authority of law, it is reversed.

June 26, 1885.

Reversed and remanded.

[The following decisions were rendered by the commissioners of appeals, in causes referred to them by the court of appeals, and adopted by the latter court at the Austin Term, 1885, of said courts.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        0
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000920941
<NAME> RED ROOF INNS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                          15,643
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                       492
<INVENTORY>                                      9,703
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,884
<PP&E>                                         836,465
<DEPRECIATION>                                  78,878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 890,655
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,255
<BONDS>                                        501,001
<COMMON>                                           285
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     316,474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   890,655
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,694
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,601
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    90
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,863)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,301)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,562)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,562)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
        

</TABLE>
Form of Waiver



 Exhibit 10.2 
 FIRST COMMUNITY BANK CORPORATION OF AMERICA 
 WAIVER 
 DECEMBER 23, 2008 
 In consideration for the benefits
I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation in the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my
compensation or benefits that are required to comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008. 
 I acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called “golden parachute”
agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital Purchase Program. 
 This waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation,
including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these regulations on my
employment relationship. 
  

	
	  

	 Name
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           967
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         8,371
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    9,106
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         9,106
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           9,106
<LOANS>                                      247,680
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (2,805)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               326,068
<DEPOSITS>                                   202,653
<SHORT-TERM>                                  18,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,320
<LONG-TERM>                                   58,473
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          26
<OTHER-SE>                                    44,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               326,068
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                4,765
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                154
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 902
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               5,821
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2,425
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               934
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2,462
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    147
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  612
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       400
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     400
<EPS-BASIC>                                   0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  3.11
<LOANS-NON>                                    3,164
<LOANS-PAST>                                   3,164
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                2,773
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              (3,160)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    514
<RECOVERIES>                                      12
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             (2,805)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          (2,805)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1142** 

In re: LEROY WILLIAMSON , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
. ( 7:10

- cr - 00123

- FL

- 1 ; 7:13

- cv - 00194

- FL )

Submitted : May 19 , 2015 Decided: May 21, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
. Leroy Williamson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Leroy Williamson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials befor e th is court and argument would n ot aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                   GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES


Access Control Center, Inc.
Incorporated:  Delaware

Charger Industries
Incorporated:  California

DBS Services, Inc.
Incorporated:  California

Ensambladora de Matamoros, S.A. de C.V.
Incorporated:  Mexico

Fuba Communications Systems GmbH
Incorporated:  Germany

General Instrument (Argentina) S.A.
Incorporated:  Argentina

General Instrument (Australia) Pty Ltd
Incorporated:  Australia

General Instrument Authorization Services, Inc.
Incorporated:  Delaware

General Instrument (Brasil) Ltda.
Incorporated:  Brazil

General Instrument (Canada) Inc.
Incorporated:  Canada

General Instrument Corporation (Chile) Limitada
Incorporated:  Chile

General Instrument China Holdings, Inc.
Incorporated:  Delaware

General Instrument Equity Corporation
Incorporated:  Delaware

General Instrument (Europe) Ltd.
Incorporated:  England

General Instrument (France) SAS
Incorporated:  France


<PAGE>

General Instrument HDTV Corporation
Incorporated:  Delaware

General Instrument Holdings (Taiwan), Inc.
Incorporated:  Delaware

General Instrument (Hong Kong) Limited
Incorporated:  Hong Kong

General Instrument (India), Inc.
Incorporated:  Delaware

General Instrument International, Inc.
Incorporated:  Delaware

General Instrument (Japan) Ltd.
Incorporated:  Japan

General Instrument (Mauritius), Inc.
Incorporated:  Delaware

General Instrument (Mexico), S.A. de C.V.
Incorporated:  Mexico

General Instrument of Taiwan, Ltd.
Incorporated:  Taiwan

General Instrument Packet Systems, Inc.
Incorporated:  Delaware

General Instrument Purchasing Corp.
Incorporated:  Delaware

General Instrument Services, Inc.
Incorporated:  Delaware

General Instrument (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
Incorporated:  Singapore

GI India Pvt. Ltd.
Incorporated:  India

GI Mauritius Holdings, Ltd.
Incorporated:  Mauritius

Jerrold DC Radio, Inc.
Incorporated:  Delaware

Magnitude Compression Systems, Inc.
Incorporated:  California


<PAGE>

Next Level Communications
Incorporated:  California

NextLevel Systems (Puerto Rico), Inc.
Incorporated:  Delaware

The NextLevel Systems Foundation
Incorporated:  Illinois
#### Jason Paul BOUDREAUX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D10-2367.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 12, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 28, 2010.

Jason Paul Boudreaux, pro se, Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

THOMAS, J.

We affirm the order dismissing Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief and amended motion for postconviction relief as untimely. Appellant filed a timely eleven-claim motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The post-conviction court found that two of Appellant’s claims were facially insufficient and, pursuant to *Spera v. State,*971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007), permitted Appellant to file an amended motion within 60 days. *Spera*requires that a movant be given a “reasonable opportunity to amend insufficient claims”, and implies that the period not exceed 30 days. In the instant case, instead of filing a timely amended motion, Appellant moved for an extension of time to file his amendment, which was denied, and caused further delay by appealing to this court. When Appellant did file his amended motion, both the two-year window for rule 3.850 motions and the 60-day period given to amend his motion had passed, and the amended motion was *37therefore untimely filed. Furthermore, Appellant waived his arguments concerning his nine claims which were originally timely filed because he failed to specifically address these claims in his Initial Brief.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BOYD BROS TRANSPORTATION, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         587,447
<SECURITIES>                                   250,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,878,724
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    376,746
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,736,228
<PP&E>                                      92,776,591
<DEPRECIATION>                             (31,455,302)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              98,757,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,347,295
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,082
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,903,389
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                98,757,192
<SALES>                                     33,825,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,825,625
<CGS>                                       32,419,380
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,419,380
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (22,171)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             976,273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                452,143
<INCOME-TAX>                                   221,362
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            230,781
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   230,781
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>