alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w2






Exhibit 10.2




WAIVER



In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation in the
United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily
waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or
benefits that are required to comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury
as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008.



I acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive
and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called “golden
parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they relate to the
period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the
TARP Capital Purchase Program.



This waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related
to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation a claim
for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by
which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these
regulations on my employment relationship.




	 Date:December ___, 2008
Exhibit 35.3

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

I, Karen Montbach, a
Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the Company), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2011 between GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee (the
Agreement), the following:

1. A review of the Companys activities as Certificate Administrator during the reporting
period ending December 31, 2013 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2013, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigneds individual capacity.

Date: February 28, 2014



Citibank, N.A.By:

/s/ Karen MontbachName: Karen MontbachTitle: Managing Director
<PAGE>
                                                                           Ex 15

                          ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                REGARDING INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT


The Board of Directors
Northfield Laboratories Inc.:

With respect to registration statements on Form S-8 of Northfield Laboratories
Inc., we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated
July 16, 2002 related to our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

Very truly yours,

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
October 14, 2002
647 A.2d 468

#### IN THE MATTER OF DONALD J. WEBER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 19, 1994.

ORDER

DONALD J. WEBER of MENARD, ILLINOIS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DONALD J. WEBER is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by DONALD J. WEBER, pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6, shall be restrained from disbursement except upon application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause issued in this matter on April 28, 1994, be discharged.
#### Harold LONG, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-1633.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 15, 2011.

Rehearing Denied June 10, 2011.

Harold Long, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. *See Baker v. State,*878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).

WEBSTER, ROBERTS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2014-CCRE18 Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of June 1, 2014 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a)           A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)          To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### THE STATE v. HUNTER, Appellant.

Division Two,

January 9, 1903.

This is a companion case of State v. Hunter, found at page 435 et seq. of this volume.

Appeal from Cass Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *Geo. F. Longan,*Judge.

Affirmed.

*442. *A. L. Groves*and *W. I). Summers*for appellant.

*Edward C. Groiu,*Attorney-General, and *C. D. Corum*for the State.

GANTT, P. J.

On January 3, 1900, the grand jury returned an indictment against the defendant charging him with sexual intercourse with Laura Schrock, a female over the age of fourteen and under eighteen years of age, and of previous chaste character, in violation of section 1838, Revised Statutes 1899.

He was tried before Hon. George F. Longan, the judge of the Pettis circuit, who was called to try the case by Judge Jarrott, of the Cass circuit, against whom an affidavit of prejudice had been filed.

The evidence sustained all the allegations of the indictment and the instructions were correct.

The defendant is the same man who was convicted of the same offense with Emma Schrock, another young girl about sixteen years old, in the same vicinity. It is entirely unnecessary to repeat the rulings as to the constitutionality of the law for the violation of which he was convicted. That was settled in State v. Harney, 168 Mo-. 167. Neither is there the slightest doubt of the right of Judge Longan to preside in the cause.

The defendant richly merits the punishment imposed by the jury and as there is no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

All concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jermaine PAGE.

No. 2010-KK-2522.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 12, 2010.

PER CURIAM.*

GRANTED. The ruling of the trial court granting the motion to suppress is reversed, and the motion to suppress is denied. Once the officer determined the pills were not routine, over the counter medication, and the defendant indicated he had no prescription, the officer had probable cause to arrest the defendant. The case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

JOHNSON and KNOLL, JJ„ would deny the application.

*

 Chief Justice Kimball not participating in this opinion.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles ANDREWS.

No. 2011-KO-0458.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 2011.

In re Andrews, Charles; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. A, No. 485-061; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-KA-1020.

Denied.
#### Stamm *v.*Price et al.

[No. 19,983.

Filed May 2, 1963.]

*567*Williams, Williamson & Colvin*and *Wm. H. Williamson,*of Indianapolis, for appellant.

*Smith & Yarling,*of Indianapolis, for appellees.

Cooper, C. J.

This is an attempted appeal from the Superior Court of Marion County, Indiana, Room *#2,*wherein the appellant, Basil D. Stamm, brought an action against Bituminous Casualty Corporation for an alleged breach of a compensation policy.

The matter is now before us on the appellees’ motion to dismiss or affirm by reason of the appellant’s failure to set forth in the transcript of record in these proceedings an assignment of error and the motion of the appellant for permission to attach said assignment of error to said transcript.

In reviewing the record now before us, it affirmatively appears that on the 14th day of December, 1962, appellant’s motion for new trial was overruled, and, thereafter the appellant filed his transcript of record on March 13,1963.

In reviewing the applicable Rules of the Supreme Court with reference to appeals, we find the following pertinent statement in Rule 2-2: :

> *568“In all appeals and reviews the assignment of errors and transcript of the record must be filed in the office of the Clerk of Supreme Court within 90 days from the date of the judgment or the ruling on the motion for a new trial, unless the statute under which the appeal or review is taken fixes a shorter time, in which latter event the statute shall control....”

It appearing that the appellant has failed to comply with said Rule 2-2, it is therefore incumbent upon us to deny the appellant’s motion to attach to the transcript of record the assignment of error filed on April 16,1963. We also note that Rule 2-6 of the Supreme Court provides, in part:

> “There shall be attached to the front of the transcript, immediately following the index, a specific assignment of the errors relied upon by the appellant in which each specification of error shall be complete and separately numbered....”

It is the general rule of law that the assignment of errors constitutes the appellant’s complaint in this court. Our Supreme Court has stated in substance, it is a requisite to any appeal, and without a proper assignment of errors no jurisdiction is conferred upon the appellate tribunal. See *Grane*v. *Brown*(1961), 131 Ind. App. 435, 171 N. E. 2d 705; *Bolden*v. *State*(1956), 235 Ind. 695, 131 N. E. 2d 301; *Davis*v. *Pelley*(1952), 230 Ind. 248, 251, 102 N. E. 2d 910. See, also, Flanagan, Wiltrout and Hamilton’s, Indiana Trial and Appellate Practice, §2381, and authorities cited therein.

It appearing from the record that we lack jurisdiction because of the appellant’s failure to file his assignment of errors as provided by Rule 2-6, this appeal is dismissed.

*569Appeal dismissed. Costs versus appellant.

NOTE.— Reported in 189 N. E. 2d 837.
#### R.H. DONNELLEY PUBLISHING & ADVERTISING, INC., Petitioner, v. LAW OFFICE OF PATRICIA K. HERMAN, P.A., Respondent.

No. 5D10-1853.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Sept. 17, 2010.

Jack R. Reiter and Alfred L. Gonzalez, Jr., of Adorno & Yoss LLP, Miami, for Petitioner.

Patricia K. Herman, of Law Office of Patricia K. Herman, P.A., Apopka, for Respondent.

ORFINGER, J.

In its petition for writ of mandamus, R.H. Donnelley Publishing *&*Advertising, Inc. asks this Court to excuse its failure to file a timely notice of appeal directed to the circuit court’s “Final Judgment,” which concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate the parties’ contractual dispute. Instead, Donnelley seeks appellate review, utilizing the instant mandamus petition.1 “[Mjandamus is available ‘[i]f a lower court, without sufficient reason, neglects or refuses to act on a matter within its jurisdiction ... unless the aggrieved party has an adequate remedy by appeal.’ ” *Coral Springs Tower Club II Condo. Ass’n v. Dizefalo,*667 So.2d 966, 967 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (quoting *Flagship Nat’l Bank of Miami v. Testa,*429 So.2d 69, 70 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)). Because Don-nelley had an adequate remedy available by filing a timely direct appeal, which it failed to do, we conclude that the instant petition should be denied.

MANDAMUS DENIED.

GRIFFIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.

1

. Donnelley's argument on the merits appears to be valid to the extent that it contends that the circuit court incorrectly concluded that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the case due to a forum selection clause in the contract at issue. A forum selection clause concerns the appropriate venue of a case. "Venue and jurisdiction are not synonymous; rather, venue concerns the privilege of being accountable to a particular court in a particular location, whereas jurisdiction is " 'the power to act,’ the authority to adjudicate the subject matter.” *Taurus Stornoway Invs., LLC v. Kerley,*38 So.3d 840, 842 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (quoting *Bush v. State,*945 So.2d 1207, 1211 (Fla.2006)); *see Steckel v. Blafas,*549 So.2d 1211, 1213 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) (”[W]e are not compelled to accept the parties' stipulated choice of forum as controlling on the question of whether the lower court had jurisdiction.”).
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Grace P. REED, Individually, and Grace P. Reed and Louisville Trust Company, Co-Executors of the Will of William M. Reed, Deceased, Appellees.

No. 13954.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

March 7, 1960.

Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Abbott M. Sellers, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Robert N. Anderson, George W. Beatty, Meyer Rothwacks (argued by Joseph Kovner, Washington, D. C.) Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., William B. Jones, U. S. Atty., and Charles M. Allen, Asst. U. S. Atty., Louisville, Ky., for appellant.

Squire R. Ogden, Richard F. Newell of Ogden, Brown, Robertson & Marshall, Louisville, Ky., for appellees.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and CECIL, Circuit Judge, and BOYD, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of the counsel in open court, and the Court being duly advised;

*457It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed on the findings of fact and conclusions of law of Judge Shelbourne, 177 F.Supp. 205.
**Exhibit** **32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

I, David A. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended 

June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ David A. Smith

David A. Smith

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

August 9, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial statements set forth in the Form 10KSB of On Stage Entertainment, Inc.
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001035514
<NAME>                        On Stage Entertainment, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         375
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1250
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    235
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2413
<PP&E>                                         23721
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 22483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          21240
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       71
<OTHER-SE>                                     1141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   22483
<SALES>                                        28549
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               28549
<CGS>                                          12921
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  22177
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6023
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2880
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2090)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2090)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2090)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
NO. 12-10-00140-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

SIMEON LEBLEU,

APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 3RD

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

CHRISTOPHER HOLEMAN, ' ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

According to his notice of appeal, Appellant, Simeon LeBleu, attempts to appeal 

the “directive of the 3rd Dist. Court’s order sending this matter to the O.I.G. of TX Dept 

of Cr Justice.” On May 13, 2010, this court notified LeBleu that the information received 

in this appeal does not include a final judgment or other appealable order. Therefore, the 

record does not show that this court has jurisdiction of the appeal. LeBleu was further 

notified that his appeal would be dismissed if the information received in the appeal was 

not amended on or before June 14, 2010 to show the jurisdiction of this court. 

The trial court clerk has now sent us an order denying “Plaintiff’s Petition to 

Appear Before the County Grand Jury.” This order is neither a final judgment nor an 

appealable order. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.2, 42.3.

Opinion delivered July 7, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2497]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Terminating the Sporting Conservation Council

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of termination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: After consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture and the 
General Services Administration, we, the Department of the Interior, 
have terminated the Sporting Conservation Council.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce Decker, Chief, Division of 
Program and Partnership Support, External Affairs, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, 4501 N. Fairfax Drive, Mailstop EA-3103, Arlington, 
Virginia 22203; telephone 703-358-2521.

    Dated: January 7, 2010.
Ken Salazar,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2010-2497 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
#### Santo FERRARA and Annie Wolfgang Ferrara v. QUESTAR EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION CO. and Ollie Arlene Phelps.

No. 2011-C-1926.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

In re Ferrara, Annie Wolfgang; Ferrara, Santo et al.; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Desoto, 42nd Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 69,590; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,357-CA.

Denied.
#### Paul SANCHEZ and Susan Sanchez v. The PARISH OF JEFFERSON. Jefferson Parish v. Paul Sanchez and Susan Sanchez.

No. 2011-CC-2368.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Sanchez, Paul et al.; Sanchez, Susan; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Divs. B, L, Nos. 678-628, 702-807; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-C-844.

Denied.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of Navient Student Loan Trust 2014-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

Date: March 31, 2015



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|Navient Funding, LLC