alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24972]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-3023-000]


RJF-Morin Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

September 29, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
RJF-Morin Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 19, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#25636077666a4b494c4b40765055554a575165434057460b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="084e4d5a4b47666461666d5b7d7878677a7c486e6d7a6b266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24972 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Docket ID DOD-2010-OS-0120]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

Notice to delete a system of records; correction.

# SUMMARY:

On September 23, 2010 (75 FR 55907), DoD published a notice that cited an incorrect Air Force system name. This notice corrects that error.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mrs. Cindy Allard at (703) 588-6830.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

In the notice published on September 23, 2010, in FR Doc. 2010-23791, on page 57907, in the first column, under the heading “Corrections”, in lines 13 and 14, remove the system name “Applications for Appointment and Extended Active Duty Files” and add in its place “Military Personnel Records System”.

Dated: September 27, 2010.

Mitchell S. Bryman,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010-24552 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
EXHIBIT 99.1



                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Annual  Report  of Unitrend, Inc.  (The
Company)  on  Form  10-KSB for  the  year ending  December 31, 2004,
as filed  with  the Securities and Exchange Commission  on  the date
hereof  (the Report),  I,  Conrad  A. H. Jelinger,  Chief  Executive
Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C. ss. 1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained  in  the  Report fairly presents,
in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Conrad A.H. Jelinger
                                 -----------------------------
                                 Conrad A.H. Jelinger
April 13, 2005
                                 Chief Executive Officer, Interim
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 President
EXHIBIT
32.1


Certification
Pursuant


to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Cenveo, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the ‘‘Company’’),
does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:









The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six month periods ended June 28,
2008 (the ‘‘Form 10-Q’’) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
August 7, 2008


/s/ Robert
G. Burton, Sr.


Robert G.
Burton, Sr.


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer





Date:
August 7, 2008


/s/ Mark
S. Hiltwein


Mark S.
Hiltwein


Chief
Financial Officer







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Cenveo, Inc. and will be retained by
Cenveo, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q
or as a separate disclosure document.
#### STATE ex rel. Michael DUNCAN v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0383.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Duncan, Michael; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. G, No. 394-577; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2009-K-1609.

Denied.
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of NSTAR



|                                 |  |                       
|-------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|                                 |  | State of Incorporation
|NSTAR Electric Company           |  | Massachusetts         
|NSTAR Gas Company                |  | Massachusetts         
|Hopkinton LNG Corp.              |  | Massachusetts         
|Advanced Energy Systems, Inc.    |  | Massachusetts         
|Harbor Electric Energy Company   |  | Massachusetts         
|BEC Funding LLC                  |  | Delaware              
|BEC Funding II, LLC              |  | Delaware              
|CEC Funding, LLC                 |  | Delaware              
|NSTAR Communications, Inc.       |  | Massachusetts         
|MATEP, LLC                       |  | Delaware              
|NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation |  | Massachusetts
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2014, by andamong WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator, andCustodian, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Trustee, with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2014-LC16 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

  

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,609
<SECURITIES>                                    79,442
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,009
<INVENTORY>                                     13,755
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,070
<PP&E>                                         351,502
<DEPRECIATION>                                 115,875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 678,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,111
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,688
<OTHER-SE>                                     231,107
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   678,512
<SALES>                                        291,737
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               296,498
<CGS>                                          174,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  174,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                78,203
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,333
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,871
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,623
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,530
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,093
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,093
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.11


</TABLE>
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1503 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 24, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the Avra/Black Wash Reclamation and Riparian Restoration Project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

HR 1503 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Avra/Black Wash Rec3 lamation and Riparian Restoration Project’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

6 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102– 

7 575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by 

8 adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 16ll. AVRA/BLACK WASH RECLAMATION AND RI10 PARIAN RESTORATION PROJECT, PIMA 

11 COUNTY, ARIZONA. 

12 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera13 tion with Pima County, Arizona, may participate in the 

14 planning, design, and construction of water recycling fa15 cilities and to enhance and restore riparian habitat in the 

16 Black Wash Sonoran Desert ecosystem in Avra Valley 

17 west of the metropolitan Pima County area. 

18 ‘‘(b) COST SHARING.—The Federal share of the cost 

19 of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 

20 25 percent of the cost of the project. 

21 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Federal funds provided under 

22 this section shall not be used for operation or maintenance 

23 of the project described in subsection (a). 

24 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

25 is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

26 $14,000,000. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

HR 1503 RFS

1 ‘‘(e) USE OF FUNDS.—Federal funds provided under 

2 this section shall only be used for the design, planning 

3 and construction of water-related infrastructure.’’. 

4 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

5 for Public Law 102–575 is amended by inserting after the 

6 last item relating to title XVI the following: 

‘‘Sec. 16ll. Avra/Black Wash Reclamation and Riparian Restoration Project, 

Pima County, Arizona.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 

By DEBORAH M. SPRIGGS, 

Deputy Clerk. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

The undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of Valley Financial Corporation, certifies that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).

 

Dated:  May 13, 2009

 

|   | /s/ Kimberly B. Snyder_______ |
|--------|-------------------------------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|
857 A.2d 673

#### Robert ROHRER, Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 9, 2004.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of July, 2004, probable jurisdiction is noted and the order appealed is affirmed.
#### H. Prince & Co. v. W. C. Turner.

(No. 3332.)

Appeal from Wise County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 657. *Attachment; proceedings in, held sufficient; case stated.*Prince & Co. sued in justice’s court upon a verified account for $137.20 against Mrs. M. Turner, and sued out an attachment therein against the property of W. C. Turner. In the affidavit for attachment it was alleged that “ the defendant W. C. Turner, doing business under the firm name and style of M. Turner, is justly indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of $137.20; that the defendant W. O. Turner has disposed of his property with intent to defraud his creditors, ” etc. The citation commanded the officer to summon “W. O. Turner, doing business under the firm name and style of M. Turner, to appear,” etc. The attachment was levied upon the property of W. 0. Turner. In justice’s court judgment was rendered for the defendant. Prince *& Go.*appealed to the county court, and in that court their attachment proceedings were quashed, and judgment rendered in their favor for the debt sued for and costs; but the court of course refused to enforce the attachment lien upon the property levied upon. The motion to quash the attachment proceedings contained three grounds, viz.; 1. That the affidavit should have stated that “the defendant has disposed of his property, *in whole or in part,”*instead of stating as it does, that “the defendant has disposed of his property.” *Held:*This ground is not maintainable. *574If defendant was about to dispose of any portion of Ms property with the intent to defraud his creditors, cause for the attachment existed. The allegation that he was about to dispose of his property, included the whole of his property, and the whole includes every part. [Blum v. Davis, 56 Tex. 423.] 2. Because of variance between the account sued on, and the account described in the affidavit, the account sued on being against Mrs. M. Turner, while the indebtedness named in the affidavit is against W. C. Turner, doing business under the style and name of M. Turner. 3. Because of variance between the affidavit and writ, and the return upon the writ, in that said return shows that the property levied upon was the property of W. C. Turner, without stating that W. 0. Turner was doing business under the style and name of M. Turner. *Held:*The citation, affidavit for and writ of attachment, each show that the suit was against W. 0. Turner, doing business under the style and name of M. Turner, and that the debt sued for was the identical debt evidenced by the account. Pleadings in justice’s court being oral, the same particularity and exactness in regard thereto are not required, that are required in the case of written pleadings. These objections are without merit. The court erred in quashing the attachment proceedings.

April 22, 1885.

Reversed and remanded.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 December 16, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-12205

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00175-CV-WLS-1

WILLIE FARMER, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

AIG LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

_________________________

(December 16, 2008)

Before BIRCH, DUBINA and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Willie Farmer, Jr. appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to

AIG Life Insurance Co. in his Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

(ERISA) action seeking long-term disability benefits. 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. 

Farmer asserts (1) he was denied a full and fair review of the administrative

decision denying his claim; (2) the district court was precluded from affirming the

denial of benefits on the basis of the “365 day” rule; (3) this court, under de novo

review, should resolve his contention that he is “totally and permanently disabled”

as defined by the policy at issue; and (4) the district court erred in concluding his

claim for disability benefits was precluded by the “365 day” rule.

After review of the record, and the parties’ briefs, we conclude Farmer’s

contentions on appeal are without merit. We find no error in the district court’s

grant of summary judgment to AIG. The judgment is, accordingly,

AFFIRMED.

2
855 A.2d 762

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Edwin Armondo Reyes AYALA, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Jan. 13, 2004.

Decided Aug. 18, 2004.

Janna Rae Steinruck, for Com. of Pa.

James Arthur Gratton, Ronks, James Jude Karl, for Edwin Armondo Reyes Ayala.

Before CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, BAER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2004, the order of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas is reversed insofar as it declared the Registration of Sexual Offenders Act unconstitutional, and the case is remanded for further proceedings. *See Commonwealth v. Williams,*574 Pa. 487, 832 A.2d 962 (2003); *Commonwealth v. Maldonado,*576 Pa. 101, 838 A.2d 710 (2003).

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
#### Seth J. HERBST, Appellant, v. Patricia M. HERBST, Appellee.

No. 4D09-1383.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 30, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 19, 2010.

Eddie Stephens of the Law Office of Eddie Stephens, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Neil B. Jagolinzer of Christiansen <& Jacknin, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The question presented by this appeal is whether a former spouse can be required under section 61.161 to reimburse the other former spouse for 75% of her attorney’s fees where the recipient has demonstrated no need for reimbursement of such fees. Because the record reflects that the parties have the same approximate disposable income, we conclude that the trial court’s finding is not supported by the record. *See Satter v. Satter,*709 So.2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). We are mindful of the narrow scope of our review for abuse of discretion; however, we are compelled to reverse the fee award because while the record may support an award for a slight percentage of fees in her favor, it clearly does not support an award of 75%. *See Rosen v. Rosen,*696 So.2d 697 (Fla.1997).

We reverse and remand for recalculation the award of attorney’s fees and affirm the judgment in all other respects.

*Reversed.*

FARMER, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

1

. § 61.16, Fla. Stat. (2009).