alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                             

                                                                      Exhibit 15


                          ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                  REGARDING INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REVIEW REPORT



The Board of Directors
Northfield Laboratories Inc.:

With respect to the registration statements of Form S-8 of Northfield
Laboratories Inc., we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report
dated September 25, 1998 related to our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                        
                                                /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                                -------------------------
                                                    KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Chicago, Illinois
October 12, 1998
#### Alphonse WARREN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 16461.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

April 7, 1960.

Alphonse Warren, pro se.

Edward L. Scheufler, U. S. Atty., and Horace Warren Kimbrell, Asst. U. S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo., for appellee.

Before JOHNSEN, Chief Judge, and MATTHES, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant is under conviction by a jury on five counts of narcotics-laws violation. He has heretofore been denied leave to appeal from his conviction in forma pauperis. The reasons for such denial and the proceedings engaged in by us in relation thereto are set forth in Warren v. United States, 8 Cir., 268 F.2d 691, 692. Our opinion, after pointing out the lack of substantiality in any of the considerations sought to be raised, concluded as follows: “We are satisfied that Warren’s appeal is frivolous.”

Since the appeal had not formally been docketed, we did not at that time enter an order making dismissal of it. Appellant thereupon went back to the District Court with another forma-pauperis request, in the form of a document entitled “Writ of Error Coram Nobis on Appeal in Forma Pauperis.” On analysis and consideration of the instrument, the Court found and declared it to be “nothing more than an application to appeal in forma pauperis, which has already been denied”, and it accordingly repeated the denial which it had previously made.

Now appellant has returned to this Court with a document which he denominates as a “Petition for a Writ of Error Coram Nobis,” but which, like that filed in the District Court, amounts to another application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal from his conviction. As such, it is subject to our previous holding that his appeal is frivolous.

In order to clear our records of the proceeding and effect a termination thereof, the papers now presented to us will be permitted to be filed without payment of fees; the appeal similarly will be allowed *449to be docketed without payment of fees; and the appeal, for the reasons set out in our opinion, 268 F.2d 691, will be ordered dismissed as being frivolous.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**The following certification is furnished pursuant to therequirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission and shall not be deemed “filed”for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section.  Such certification shall not be deemedincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that such certificationis specifically incorporated by reference by the registrant.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Metro One Telecommunications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Gary E. Henry, ChiefExecutive Officer and William K. Hergenhan, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  Date:   August 13, 2007 |   | /s/ Gary E. Henry        |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                                         |   | Gary E. Henry            |
|                                         |   | President,               |
|                                         |   | Chief Executive Officer  |
|                                         |   |                     |
|                                         |   |                     |
|                                         |   | /s/ William K. Hergenhan |   |
|                                         |   | William K. Hergenhan     |
|                                         |   | Vice President,          |
|                                         |   | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

1

----
#### Michael T. PARTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D10-3803.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 29, 2011.

*1213Michael Parton, Crawforville, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Parton appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the denial of Mr. Parton’s first, third, fourth and fifth claims without further elaboration. However, we conclude that Mr. Parton’s second claim, an alleged double jeopardy violation, merits further consideration.

After a jury trial, Mr. Parton was convicted of attempted sexual battery, false imprisonment and battery. The convictions were affirmed on appeal. *See Parton v. State,*37 So.3d 871 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). Mr. Parton then filed a rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. In his second claim, he contends that his convictions for both attempted sexual battery and simple battery violate double jeopardy principles because they are based on the same acts. Decisional law holds that a defendant can be convicted of both sexual battery and battery. *See Herrera v. State,*879 So.2d 38 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); *Beltran v. State,*700 So.2d 132 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). However, if the battery is based on the same acts that form the basis for the sexual battery, double jeopardy prohibits dual convictions. *Herrera,*879 So.2d at 41.

Based on the limited record before us, it cannot be determined if the act that constituted the simple battery was the same act that constituted the attempted sexual battery. Accordingly, on remand, the trial court should either attach portions of the record that conclusively refute Mr. Par-ton’s claim or grant him an evidentiary hearing.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 906**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Fritsch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ EDWARDJ.FRITSCH                                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward J. FritschPresident and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| August 9, 2007                               |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         176,225
<SECURITIES>                                   176,386
<RECEIVABLES>                                  333,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,746
<INVENTORY>                                    131,790
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               941,472
<PP&E>                                         281,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                 106,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,568,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          247,375
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           199
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,321,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,568,654
<SALES>                                      1,002,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,002,815
<CGS>                                          360,373
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  360,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               382,989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (17,163)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                276,616
<INCOME-TAX>                                    99,083
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            177,533
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   177,533
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.86
        

</TABLE>
Order entered November 12, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01220-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.A., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JD-14-01218-X

ORDER

On October 30, 2015, we ordered the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. 

Before the Court is appellant’s November 9, 2015 motion to reinstate request for reporter’s 

record. We GRANT appellant’s motion and VACATE this Court’s October 30, 2015 order. 

We ORDER court reporter Pamela Sumler to file the reporter’s record by MONDAY, 

NOVEMBER 23, 2015. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by 

electronic transmission to Ms. Sumler and counsel for all parties.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### National Institute of Corrections

*Time and Date:*

8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Monday, November 8, 2010;

8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, November 9, 2010.

*Place:*                     National Institute of Corrections, 500 First Street, NW., Washington, DC 20534, 1(800)995-6423.                

*Status:*                     Open.                

*Matters To Be Considered:*                     Welcome New Advisory Board Members; NIC Orientation; Briefing on NIC Reports; Agency Reports; Quarterly Report by Office of Justice Programs.                

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     Thomas Beauclair, Deputy Director, 202-307-3106, ext. 44254.                

Morris L. Thigpen,

Director.

[FR Doc. 2010-24854 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-36-M
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




To the
Board of Directors of


Senesco
Technologies, Inc.




We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Numbers 333-157417,
333-140238 and 333-104105 on Form S-8 and Registration Numbers 333-148779,
333-146691 and 333-138405 of our report dated September 26, 2007 on the
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows of
Senesco Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiary for the year ended June 30, 2007,
appearing in this Annual Report on From 10-K for the year ended June 30,
2009.  Our report dated September 26, 2007 relating to the
consolidated financial statements includes an emphasis paragraph relating to an
uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern.






/s/
GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP


New York,
New York




September 25,
2009
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Daniel B. PRINCE.

No. 2011-KK-0737.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2011.

In re Prince, Daniel B.; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedíal Writs, Parish of Acadia, 15th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 72,189; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW 11-00423.

Denied.
#### Robert T. FROST, Appellant, v. LASALLE BANK, as trustee for Wamu Mortgage Pass Through Certificates Series 2007-OA5 Trust, Appellee.

No. 4D09-2668.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 27, 2010.

Michael Wrubel of Michael Jay Wrubel, P.A., Davie, for appellant.

Heidi J. Weinzetl of Shapiro & Fishman, LLP, Boca Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Based on appellee’s confession of error, we reverse the circuit court’s final summary judgment of foreclosure and remand for further proceedings.

*Reversed and remanded.*

FARMER, STEVENSON, and GERBER, JJ., concur.
#### Daniel S. BOYLE, Appellant, v. Gertrude AGUIRRE, Appellee.

No. 5D10-1461.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Feb. 18, 2011.

Albert D. Gibson and Jamie Billotte Moses of Fisher, Rushmer, Werrenrath, Dickson, Talley & Dunlap, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Diego Handel, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment quieting title to certain real property in favor of the appellee against the claims of her son, Daniel S. Boyle. Because it is premature, *612we decline to address Boyle’s argument that the trial court failed to balance the equities between the parties. The trial court expressly reserved jurisdiction to determine the issue of damages.

AFFIRMED.

MONACO, C.J., EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1583 

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to extend 

the Milk Income Loss Contract Program through fiscal year 2012 at 

the 45 percent payment rate, to establish a minimum price for Class 

I milk under Federal milk marketing orders, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2007 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act 

of 2002 to extend the Milk Income Loss Contract Program through fiscal year 2012 at the 45 percent payment rate, to establish a minimum price for Class I 

milk under Federal milk marketing orders, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Dairy Farm5 er Protection Act’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1583 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONTINUATION OF MILK INCOME LOSS CONTRACT 

2 PROGRAM. 

3 (a) CONTINUATION OF PROGRAM; PAYMENT PER4 CENTAGE RATE.—Subsection (c)(3)(C) of section 1502 of 

5 the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 

6 U.S.C. 7982) is amended by striking ‘‘0 percent’’ and in7 serting ‘‘and ending on September 30, 2012, 45 percent’’. 

8 (b) MAXIMUM PAYMENT QUANTITY.—Subsection 

9 (d)(2) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘2,400,000 

10 pounds’’ and inserting ‘‘4,800,000 pounds’’. 

11 (c) CONTRACT SIGNUP AND DURATION.—Sub12 sections (f) and (g)(1) of such section are amended by 

13 striking ‘‘September 30, 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘September 

14 30, 2012’’. 

15 SEC. 3. MINIMUM PRICE FOR CLASS I MILK UNDER FED16 ERAL MILK MARKETING ORDERS. 

17 (a) MINIMUM PRICE.—Notwithstanding any other 

18 provision of law, effective October 1, 2007, the minimum 

19 price for Class I milk under each Federal milk marketing 

20 order issued under section 8c(5) of the Agricultural Ad21 justment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c(5)), reenacted with amend22 ments by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 

23 1937, shall be $15.58 per hundredweight during fiscal 

24 year 2008. 

25 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—The minimum price 

26 for Class I milk to be in effect for a fiscal year under 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HR 1583 IH

1 subsection (a) (other than fiscal year 2008) shall be ad2 justed by the percent that equals the total percentage 

3 change that occurred in the Consumer Price Index for all 

4 urban consumers (all items; U.S. city average) for the 12 

5 month period ending June 30 preceding the fiscal year for 

6 which the adjustment is made. The adjustment made each 

7 fiscal year by this subsection shall be added on a com8 pounded basis to the sum of all adjustments made each 

9 fiscal year after fiscal year 2008 under this subsection. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 22

- 40199 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Victor Hinojosa**

**- Alvarez,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:20

- CR

- 783

- 2

Before **Smith, Dennis,**  and **Southwick,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
The attorney appointed to represent Hinojosa

- Alvarez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hinojosa

- Alvarez has filed a letter in the district court in response to

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 22, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-40199 Document: 00516481472 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/22/2022No. 22

- 40199

2 counsel’s motion . The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Hinojosa

- Alvarez ’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hinojosa

- Alvarez ’s letter submitted to the district court . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave
to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R**

. 42.2. Case: 22-40199 Document: 00516481472 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/22/2022
EXHIBIT 32

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                          PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (the
"Report") of CIMNET, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2006,
I, John D. Richardson, III, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                       BY: /s/ JOHN D. RICHARDSON, III
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John D. Richardson, III
                                           Chairman of the Board,
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           and Principal Accounting Officer



April 30, 2007

                                       21