alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     ANNUAL  REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          1,424
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            738
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     4,274
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          1,017
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              911
<LOANS>                                        44,663
<ALLOWANCE>                                       352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 53,129
<DEPOSITS>                                     40,435
<SHORT-TERM>                                      500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               478
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           77
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 53,129
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 3,348
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 356
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  109
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                3,813
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              1,818
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,818
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           1,995
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      36
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 1,260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   883
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      559
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .87
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.96
<LOANS-NON>                                       217
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  326
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      10
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 352
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              352
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59685-59686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24447]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Office of Innovation and Entrepreneurship; the National Advisory 
Council on Innovation and Entrepreneurship: National Advisory Council 
on Innovation and Entrepreneurship

AGENCY: Office of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, U.S. Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of an open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Advisory Committee on Innovation and 
Entrepreneurship will hold a meeting via conference call on Tuesday, 
October 12, 2010. The meeting will be conducted from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. 
and will be opened to the public. The Council was chartered on November 
10, 2009, to advise the Secretary of Commerce on matters relating to 
innovation and entrepreneurship in the United States.

DATES: October 12, 2010.
    Time: 3 p.m.-5 p.m. (EDT).

ADDRESSES: This program will be conducted and available to the public 
via a listen-in conference number, 888-942-9574, and passcode, 6315042. 
Please specify any requests for reasonable accommodation of auxiliary 
aids at least five business days in advance of the meeting. Last minute 
requests will be accepted, but may be impossible to fill.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda topics to be discussed include: 
Impressions from the first NACIE meeting, as well as NACIE strategies, 
goals and processes for 2011. No time will be available for oral 
comments from members of the public listening to the meeting. Any 
member of the public may submit pertinent written comments concerning 
the Council's affairs at any time before and after the meeting. 
Comments may be submitted to Paul Corson at the contact information 
indicated below. Copies of Board meeting minutes will be available 
within 90 days of the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Corson, Office of Innovation 
and

[[Page 59686]]

Entrepreneurship, Room 7019, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC 20230, telephone: 202-482-2042, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7606151904051918361312175812191558111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0272616d70716d6c426766632c666d612c656d74">[email protected]</span></a>. Please 
reference, ``NACIE October 12, 2010'' in the subject line of your e-
mail.

    Dated: September 24, 2010.
Esther Lee,
Director, Office of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, U.S. Department of 
Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2010-24447 Filed 9-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-03-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Amendment No. 1 to Option Agreements - Andrew J. Brown



 Exhibit 10.42 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO OPTION AGREEMENTS 
 December 16, 2008 
 This Amendment No. 1 to Option Agreements (this “Amendment”) is hereby entered into by and between Palm, Inc. (the “Company”) and Andrew J.
Brown (“Mr. Brown”). 
 WHEREAS, Mr. Brown has been granted options by the Company as set forth on Schedule A attached hereto
(the “Options”); and 
 WHEREAS, it is contemplated that Mr. Brown’s employment with the Company will terminate on or about
February 27, 2009. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Exercisability of Options. Upon the termination of Mr. Brown’s employment with the Company, the Options, to the extent vested as of
the date of Mr. Brown’s termination of employment with the Company (including any options that vest pursuant to the terms of Mr. Brown’s Severance Agreement with the Company to the extent that Mr. Brown is eligible for
severance benefits under his Severance Agreement with the Company) will remain exercisable for a period of one (1) year following the date of Mr. Brown’s termination, but in no event will any Option be exercisable later than the
expiration of the term of the relevant Option as set forth in the applicable option agreement and/or notice of grant); provided that (1) Mr. Brown complies with all of the terms of his Severance Agreement with the Company (including,
without limitation, signing and delivering to the Company a Release of Claims (as defined in the Severance Agreement) satisfactory to the Company) and (2) Mr. Brown complies with all of the terms of his Employee Agreement with the Company.
Nothing contained in this Amendment is intended to accelerate, increase or otherwise change the vesting of the Options. 
 2. Remaining
Terms. Except as expressly set forth in Section 1 above regarding the period of exercisability of the Options, the terms and conditions of the Options shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be amended hereby. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first set forth above. 
  

									
	PALM, INC.	 		 	ANDREW J. BROWN
				
	By:	 	/s/ Edward T. Colligan	 		 	/s/ Andrew J. Brown
		 	Edward T. Colligan	 		 	Andrew J. Brown
		 	President and CEO	 		 		 	
					
	Dated:	 	12/16/08	 		 	Dated:	 	12/16/08
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





Exhibit 10.2




December 22, 2008




Mr. Jeff M. Framer

c/o Image Entertainment, Inc.

20525 Nordhoff Street, Suite 200

Chatsworth, CA 91311




Re: Amendment to Employment Letter Agreement




Dear Jeff:



This amendment letter shall confirm that the Term of your Employment Letter Agreement with
Image Entertainment, Inc. (“Image”) will be extended by ninety (90) days. Accordingly, the “Term”
of the Employment Letter Agreement will now expire on June 29, 2009 and any notice for extending
the Term in the future shall be communicated to you in writing by no later than March 31, 2009
(three months prior to the expiration of this extended Term).



All other terms of the Employment Letter Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
This amendment letter contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject
matter herein. This amendment letter may only be modified in writing, signed by you and a duly
authorized representative of Image’s Board of Directors.



If you wish to accept this extension of the Term of your Employment Letter Agreement, please
so indicate by signing below.



Sincerely,




/s/ ROBERT MCCLOSKEY




Robert McCloskey




Director and Chairman of the

Compensation Committee of

the Board of Directors




THE ABOVE IS ACCEPTED AND AGREED.



	 	 	 
	/s/ JEFF M. FRAMER

	 	12/22/08
	 
	JEFF M. FRAMER

	 	DATE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,373
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,561
<PP&E>                                          14,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,488
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,202
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,301
<SALES>                                         17,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,009
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (333)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    370
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       370
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
No. D-674.

#### In re Disbarment of Dozoryst.

Nicholas George Dozoryst II, of Chicago, 111., having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. The rule to show cause, heretofore issued on January 25, 1988 [484 U. S. 1040], is hereby discharged.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6082

WILLIE WORLEY, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DANNY STANLEY, Sign Plant Manager; TOMMY MAY, Assistant 

Plant Manager; MR. PEARSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:09-ct-03175-FL)

Submitted: April 20, 2012 Decided: May 25, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Worley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Yvette Harper, 

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Willie D. Worley, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Worley v. Stanley, No. 5:09-ct-03175-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 

4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-41275

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE ANTONIO HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:14-CR-277-1

Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Antonio Hernandez

presents an argument that is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United 

States, 523 U.S. 224, 228, 235 (1998), which held that convictions used to 

enhance a sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) need not be set forth in the 

indictment. The motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-41275 Document: 00513158878 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
No. 14-41275

2

motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of 

the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 14-41275 Document: 00513158878 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41903

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

COURDALE LEE ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 869

Filed: December 16, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Cheri C. Copsey , District Judge.

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentences, affirmed

.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for r espondent.

________________________________________________ Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Courdale Lee was found guilty of domestic violence in the presence of a child , I.C.
§§ 18

- 903(a), 18

- 918(2) and 18

- 918(4), and intimidating a witness, I.C. § 18

- 2604. The district

court sentenced Lee to a unified term of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of
three years, for domestic violence in the presence of a child and a consecutive indeterminate

five

- year term for intimidating a witness . The distr ict court retained jurisdiction and Lee was
sent to participate in the rider program. The district court thereafter relinquished jurisdiction.

Lee sought an I.C.R 35 motion for reduction of his sentences, which the district court denied.

Lee appeals

.2 A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d
23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (C t. App. 1989). In
presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of
new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 15 9 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the
record, including any new information submitted with Lee ’s Rule 35 motion, we conclude no
abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Lee ’s Rule 35

motion is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 157 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 157

To require the Secretary of Energy to conduct a study on the potential 
    fuel savings from intelligent transportation systems that help 
    businesses and consumers to plan their travel and avoid delays.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

  Mr. Holt (for himself and Mr. Terry) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Energy to conduct a study on the potential 
    fuel savings from intelligent transportation systems that help 
    businesses and consumers to plan their travel and avoid delays.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fuel Savings, Smarter Travel, and 
Efficient Roadways Act''.

SEC. 2. STUDY OF FUEL SAVINGS FROM INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS.

    Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Energy shall, in consultation with the Secretary of 
Transportation, report to Congress on the potential fuel savings from 
intelligent transportation systems that help businesses and consumers 
to plan their travel and avoid delays. These systems may include web-
based real-time transit information systems, congestion information 
systems, carpool information systems, parking information systems, 
freight route management, and traffic management systems. The report 
shall include analysis of fuel savings, analysis of system costs, 
assessment of local, State, and regional differences in applicability, 
and evaluation of case studies, best practices, and emerging 
technologies from both the private and public sector.
                                 <all>
```
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-87

LT Case No. 16-2018-CF-008153AXXX-MA

_____________________________

LENARD A. CRUMEDY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

London M. Kite, Judge.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Special 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Zachary F. Lawton, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

January 23, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EISNAUGLE, BOATWRIGHT, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LOUIS M. KATZ, RICHARD J. KATZ and CHARLES I. KATZ,

Appellant s

,

v.

PHYLLIS KA TZ and

HOWA RD J. WIENER & ASSOCIATES, P.L.

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 16

- 3291

[ January 11, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Janis Brustares Keyser , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502010CP005000XXXXMB

.

John K. Buckley, Delray Beach, for appellant s

.

Howard J. Wiener, Palm Beach Gardens, for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., L EVINE , J., and S INGHAL

, R AAG , Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES of GEVITY HR, INC. as
of DECEMBER 31, 2003

| | Staff
Leasing, LLC*
| | -------------------

| | Gevity
HR, LP*
| | --------------

| | Gevity
HR II, LP*
| | -----------------

| | Gevity
HR III, LP*
| | ------------------

| | Gevity
HR IV, LP*
| | -----------------

| | Gevity
HR V, LP*
| | ----------------

| | Gevity
HR VI, LP*
| | -----------------

| | Gevity
HR VII, LP*
| | ------------------

| | Gevity
HR VIII, LP*
| | -------------------

| | Gevity
HR IX, LP*
| | -----------------

| | Gevity
HR X, LP*
| | ----------------

| | Gevity
HR XI, LLC* (1)
| | ----------------------

| | Gevity
HR XII, Corp.* (2)
| | -------------------------

| | Gevity
HR ASO, LLC*
| | -------------------

| | Concorda
Insurance Company Limited
| | ----------------------------------

| | *
Also does business under the name Gevity HR.
| | ------------------------------------------------

| | (1)              P.
S. of New Mexico, Inc. became Gevity HR XI, LLC as of March 4, 2003.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)              Jarvis
Services Corp. became Gevity HR XII Corp. as of February 10, 2003.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Roberto MOSQUERA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D11-1849.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 31, 2011.

*971Roberto Mosquera, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before RAMIREZ, SUAREZ and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Roberto Mosquera’s motion to correct illegal sentence was granted in part. On appeal, he has not provided us with a brief explaining where he is assigning error.