alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re John W. MILTON.

No. 2010-B-2409.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 24, 2010.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.*

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent maintained incomplete records of his client trust account, which resulted in a negligent commingling and conversion of funds. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent *278and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which the parties stipulated that respondent has violated Rule 1.15 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that John W. Milton, Louisiana Bar Roll number 19066, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day, fully deferred, subject to a two-year period of supervised probation governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the Petition for Consent Discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent, the ODC, and the probation monitor execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

*

 Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer of NSTAR, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(i) | the enclosed Annual Report of NSTAR on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of NSTAR.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: February 17, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    THOMAS J. MAY   
|                         |  |  |  | Thomas J. May          
|                         |  |  |  | Chairman, President and
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
856 A.2d 40

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Karen Gwyn MUIR, Respondent.

No. 891 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 16, 2004.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of July, 2004, on certification by the Disciplinary Board that the respondent, KAREN GWYN MUIR, who was suspended by Order of this Court dated March 1, 2004, for a period of three months, has filed a verified statement showing compliance with all the terms and conditions of the Order of Suspension and Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E., and there being no other outstanding order of suspension or disbarment, KAREN GWYN MUIR, is hereby reinstated to active status, effective immediately.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATIONS





The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of Valley Financial Corporation, certifies that the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Valley Financial Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).




Dated:  August 10, 2010

/s/Ellis L. GutshallChief Executive Officer
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00385-CR

ANTONIO TREVINO

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 18FC-0729F

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 17, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      12,736,009
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,849,716
<PP&E>                                       9,732,176
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,441,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,292,309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,542,761
<BONDS>                                      2,719,513
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        95,263
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,934,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,292,309
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,949,329
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             908,931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,040,827)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,040,827)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,040,827)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.96)
        

</TABLE>
#### SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL & CLINICS, INC., Appellant, v. Michael Adam DUNN and Kathie Lynette Dunn, Individually and as personal Representatives of the estate of Michael Dylan Dunn, Deceased, and University of Florida Board of Trustees, Appellees.

No. 1D10-1753.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 21, 2010.

Susan L. Kelsey, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Rebecca Bowen Creed, Jacksonville, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. *See Hinote v. Ford Motor Co.,*958 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

LEWIS, ROWE, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, February 24, 2010, 6 p.m. to February 26, 2010, 4 p.m., Hilton Salt Lake City Center, 255 South West Temple, Salt Lake City, UT, 84101 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 26, 2010, 75 FR 4092-4093.                

The meeting title has been changed to “Program Project: Integrative Biomedical Computing Resource Center”. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: January 28, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-2462 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### D.T. Mother of S.R., A Minor Child, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 1D10-5325.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 2, 2011.

Crystal McBee Frusciante of Crystal McBee Law Firm, Jupiter, for Appellant.

Kelley Schaeffer, Tavares and Ward L. Metzger, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a September 29, 2010, final order placing D.T.’s child, S.R., in a permanent guardianship and terminating protective supervision by the Department of Children and Families. D.T. challenges not the final order, but a preceding order denying her motion for reunification with S.R. The August 24, 2010, order also denied her motion for reunification with her other child, N.N. She separately appealed the order as to N.N., which this court affirmed in *D.T. Mother of N.N. v.*
      *641
      *Florida Dep’t of Children & Families,*54 So.3d 632 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). We now affirm the order as to S.R. for the reasons expressed in *N.N.*

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, THOMAS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
#### INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, FSB v. Joel C. GROSHONG.

No. 2010-CC-1179.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 1, 2010.

PER CURIAM*

In response to foreclosure proceedings brought by Indymae Federal Bank, FSB *171(“Indymac”), Joel C. Groshong filed a petition for preliminary injunction. Mr. Groshong alleged Indymac offered to enter into a forbearance agreement, and he accepted that offer by complying with all of its terms.

In granting the preliminary injunction, the district court found there were unanswered questions regarding whether the parties entered into a forbearance agreement. The court of appeal reversed that judgment, finding Mr. Groshong did not comply with the requirements of the plan, because he did not return the signed agreement by the April 1, 2009 deadline set by Indymac. Mr. Groshong now applies to this court, seeking review of that judgment.

Like the district court, we conclude there are factual questions concerning the forbearance agreement. In particular, we note the April 1, 2009 deadline was contained in a letter which Mr. Groshong claims he did not receive until April 9, 2009. Under these circumstances, we cannot say the district court erred in granting the preliminary injunction to stop the foreclosure, pending a determination as to whether the parties entered into a valid forbearance agreement.

Accordingly, the writ is granted. The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed. The judgment of the district court is reinstated, and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

CLARK, J., dissents.

*

 Chief Justice Kimball not participating in this opinion.
#### STATE ex rel. Theodore J. PHILLIPS STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1142.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re Phillips, Theodore J.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 2003-162543; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 0484.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; *State v. Parker,*98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694.
EXHIBIT 21

                                            SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

     The  following  is  a  list  of  all  subsidiaries,   the  state  or  other
 jurisdiction  of  incorporation  or  organization  of each, and the names under
 which such subsidiaries do business:

1.   INVU Plc, a company  incorporated  under the laws of  England,  is a wholly
     owned subsidiary of the Company.

2.   INVU Services Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England, is
     a wholly owned  subsidiary  of INVU Plc and an indirect  subsidiary  of the
     Company.

3.   INVU International  Holdings Limited, a company incorporated under the laws
     of  England,  is a wholly  owned  subsidiary  of INVU  Plc and an  indirect
     subsidiary of the Company.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1477 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend military commissary and 

exchange store privileges to veterans with a compensable service-connected disability and to their dependents. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2007 

Mr. FORTENBERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend military 

commissary and exchange store privileges to veterans 

with a compensable service-connected disability and to 

their dependents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disabled Veterans 

5 Commissary and Exchange Store Benefits Act’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1477 IH

1 SEC. 2. COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE STORE PRIVILEGES 

2 FOR DISABLED VETERANS AND THEIR DE3 PENDENTS. 

4 (a) EXTENSION OF PRIVILEGES.—Chapter 54 of title 

5 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 1065. Use of commissary and exchange stores: dis8 abled veterans and their dependents 

9 ‘‘(a) DISABLED VETERANS.—A veteran with a com10 pensable service-connected disability shall be permitted to 

11 use commissary and exchange stores on the same basis 

12 as a member of the armed forces entitled to retired or 

13 retainer pay. 

14 ‘‘(b) DEPENDENTS.—A dependent of a veteran de15 scribed in subsection (a) shall be permitted to use com16 missary and exchange stores on the same basis as a de17 pendent of a member of the armed forces entitled to re18 tired or retainer pay. 

19 ‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the terms ‘vet20 eran’ and ‘service-connected’ have the meanings given 

21 those terms in section 101 of title 38.’’. 

22 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

23 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 

24 at the end the following new item: 

‘‘1065. Use of commissary and exchange stores: disabled veterans and their dependents’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HR 1477 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 1065 of title 10, 

2 United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take 

3 effect at the end of the 90-day period beginning on the 

4 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Journal  Register  Company (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period ended  December 26, 2004,  as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
Robert M.  Jelenic,  Chairman,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of the
Company,  and Jean B. Clifton,  Executive  Vice  President  and Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  each  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robert M. Jelenic
_____________________
Robert M. Jelenic
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
March 25, 2005

/s/ Jean B. Clifton
___________________
Jean B. Clifton
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 25, 2005


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as amended (the  "Exchange
Act"),  or  incorporated  by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended,  or the Exchange Act,  except as may be expressly set forth by
specific  reference  in any such  filing.  A  signed  original  of this  written
statement   required  by  Section   906,  or  other   document   authenticating,
acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature  that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been  provided to Journal  Register  Company and will be retained by Journal
Register Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7164 

AN ACT 

To add Ireland to the E–3 nonimmigrant visa program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7164 EH

1 SECTION 1. E–3 VISAS FOR IRISH NATIONALS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101(a)(15)(E)(iii) of the 

3 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

4 1101(a)(15)(E)(iii)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or, on a 

5 basis of reciprocity as determined by the Secretary of 

6 State, a national of Ireland,’’ after ‘‘Australia’’. 

7 (b) EMPLOYER REQUIREMENTS.—Section 212 of the 

8 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182) is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) by redesignating the second subsection (t) 

11 (as added by section 1(b)(2)(B) of Public Law 108– 

12 449 (118 Stat. 3470)) as subsection (u); and 

13 (2) by adding at the end of subsection (t)(1) 

14 (as added by section 402(b)(2) of Public Law 108– 

15 77 (117 Stat. 941)) the following: 

16 ‘‘(E) In the case of an attestation filed with re17 spect to a national of Ireland described in section 

18 101(a)(15)(E)(iii), the employer is, and will remain 

19 during the period of authorized employment of such 

20 Irish national, a participant in good standing in the 

21 E–Verify program described in section 403(a) of the 

22 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Respon23 sibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1324a note).’’. 

24 (c) APPLICATION ALLOCATION.—Paragraph (11) of 

25 section 214(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

26 U.S.C. 1184(g)(11)) is amended to read as follows: 
3 

•HR 7164 EH

1 ‘‘(11)(A) The Secretary of State may approve 

2 initial applications submitted for aliens described in 

3 section 101(a)(15)(E)(iii) only as follows: 

4 ‘‘(i) For applicants who are nationals of 

5 the Commonwealth of Australia, not more than 

6 10,500 for a fiscal year. 

7 ‘‘(ii) For applicants who are nationals of 

8 Ireland, not more than a number equal to the 

9 difference between 10,500 and the number of 

10 applications approved in the prior fiscal year 

11 for aliens who are nationals of the Common12 wealth of Australia. 

13 ‘‘(B) The approval of an application described 

14 under subparagraph (A)(ii) shall be deemed for nu15 merical control purposes to have occurred on Sep16 tember 30 of the prior fiscal year. 

17 ‘‘(C) The numerical limitation under subpara18 graph (A) shall only apply to principal aliens and 

19 not to the spouses or children of such aliens.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 28, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7164 

AN ACT 

To add Ireland to the E–3 nonimmigrant visa 

program.