alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS                               CORPORATE INFORMATION
----------------------                               ---------------------

<S>                                                  <C>
W. ANTHONY HUFF                                      Corporate Office
Chairman and Director                                1950 Spectrum Circle, Suite B-100
                                                     Marietta, Georgia  30067
DENNIS A. BAKAL                                      678-264-0400
President and Chief Executive Officer
                                                     Registrar and Transfer Agent
LINDA K. ROBERTS                                     Registrar & Transfer Company
Vice President/Administration and                    10 Commerce Drive
Secretary                                            Cranford, New Jersey  07016

SUSAN P. DIAL                                        Independent Auditors
Chief Financial Officer                              Yohalem, Gillman & Company, LLP
                                                     New York, New York
WILLIAM M. KELLY
Vice President/Transportation                        General Counsel
                                                     Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP
STANLEY E. LAIKEN                                    Suite 3100, Promenade II
Vice President/Sales                                 1230 Peachtree Street, N.E.
                                                     Atlanta, Georgia  30309-3592
WILLIAM R. ASBELL, JR.
Vice President and General Counsel                   Annual Shareholders' Meeting
                                                     The annual meeting of shareholders
ROBERT E. ALTENBACH                                  will be held on Thursday, June 29,
Director                                             2000 at 10:00 a.m. local time at the
                                                     offices  of the company, 1950
GREGORY G. HARDWICK                                  Spectrum Circle, Suite B-100
Director                                             Marietta, Georgia 30067

DANNY L. PIXLER
Director
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
James S.J. Manuso, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
SuperGen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
SuperGen, Inc.

| |  | By:    |  | /s/JAMES S.J. MANUSO                                               
| |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Name:  |  | James S.J. Manuso                                                  
| |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

I,
Michael Molkentin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
SuperGen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of SuperGen, Inc.

| |  | By:    |  | /s/MICHAEL MOLKENTIN                                                
| |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Name:  |  | Michael Molkentin                                                   
| |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1647 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1647

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to include podiatrists as 
   physicians for purposes of covering physicians services under the 
                           Medicaid Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2007

   Ms. DeGette (for herself, Mr. Castle, Mr. Becerra, and Mr. Kirk) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to include podiatrists as 
   physicians for purposes of covering physicians services under the 
                           Medicaid Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCLUDING PODIATRISTS AS PHYSICIANS UNDER THE MEDICAID 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1905(a)(5)(A) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1396d(a)(5)(A)) is amended by striking ``section 
1861(r)(1)'' and inserting ``paragraphs (1) and (3) of section 
1861(r)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to services furnished on or after January 1, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 15


                         ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                REGARDING INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT


The Board of Directors
Northfield Laboratories Inc.:

With respect to registration statements (Nos. 33-84264, 333-15877, 333-51681,
333-79579 and 333-102672) on Form S-8 of Northfield Laboratories Inc., we
acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated March 20, 2003
related to our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436( C ) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered to be a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

Very truly yours,




/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
April 14, 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the: (i) Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (No. 333-29069) related to the Company's Stock Incentive Plan; and
(ii) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-43291) related to the Company's
Management Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated April 19, 2002 (except for
Note 4, as to which the date is December 19, 2002) with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Crescent Operating, Inc. and
subsidiaries included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2001.

                                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Dallas, Texas
January 13, 2003
#### In re Appeal of Decision of the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 2010-ADMIN-33.

No. 2010-OB-2161.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Lott-Johnson, Bishop Frank E.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Appeal of Decision of the Disciplinary Board Office of the Attorney Disciplinary Board, No. 2010-ADMIN-33.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 142 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 142

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the arbitration of 
     initial contract negotiation disputes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the arbitration of 
     initial contract negotiation disputes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Labor Relations First Contract 
Negotiations Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. INITIAL CONTRACT DISPUTES.

    Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 158) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h)(1) If, not later than 60 days after the certification of a 
new representative of employees for the purpose of collective 
bargaining, the employer of the employees and the representative have 
not reached a collective bargaining agreement with respect to the terms 
and conditions of employment, the employer and the representative shall 
jointly select a mediator to mediate those issues on which the employer 
and the representative cannot agree.
    ``(2) If the employer and the representative are unable to agree 
upon a mediator, either party may request the Federal Mediation and 
Conciliation Service to select a mediator and the Federal Mediation and 
Conciliation Service shall upon the request select a person to serve as 
mediator.
    ``(3) If, not later than 30 days after the date of the selection of 
a mediator under paragraph (1) or (2), the employer and the 
representative have not reached an agreement, the employer or the 
representative may transfer the matters remaining in controversy to the 
Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service for binding arbitration.''.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Usurf America, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
O. McKinnon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and


      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                    /s/ Douglas O. McKinnon
                                    --------------------------
                                    Name: Douglas O. McKinnon
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    April 6, 2005
#### Otis BLAXTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-1377.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 28, 2011.

*1101Otis Blaxton, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

WOLF, THOMAS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
#### Bodner, Inc. *v.*Automobile Mutual Insurance Company of America.

[No. 19,882.

Filed January 9, 1963.]

*212
      *Geo. B. Gavit,*of Indianapolis, for appellant.

*White, Raub & Forrey,*of Indianapolis, for appellee.

Cooper, C. J.

This matter is now before us on the appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal in this cause, “for the reason that the said court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter of this appeal due to the fact that the record on appeal does not disclose that any judgment was rendered by the trial court.”

In reviewing the record, we are compelled to agree with the appellee that there is no final judgment, as such, entered in this cause. The pertinent part of the record reveals only the following finding:

> “Parties in Court and by *counse.*Evidence submitted and heard. Finding for Plaintiff and vs. Defendant for $248.61 and costs.”

*213
      *212Appeals in matters such as the one now before us can only be taken from final judgments. See §2-3201, *213Burns’ 1946 Repl. Under our code of civil procedure, a judgment must be entered on the Order Book and specify clearly the relief granted or other determination of the action as it is the utlimate determination of the court upon the whole matter in controversy in the action. The general rule as to the form and contents of a judgment is well discussed in §31, West’s I. L. E., Judgment, and authorities cited therein.

In reviewing the Rules of the Supreme Court of Indiana, we find the following pertinent provision in Rule 2-3:

> “... No appeal will be dismissed as of right because the case was not finally disposed of in the court below as to all issues and parties, but upon suggestion or discovery of such a situation the appellate tribunal may, in its discretion, suspend consideration until disposition is made of such issues, or it may pass upon such adjudicated .issues as are severable without prejudice to parties who may be aggrieved by subsequent proceedings in the court below.”

Being mindful that the Rules of the Supreme Court have the force and effect of law, we, using our discretion, now suspend consideration of this appeal until such time as the Marion County Municipal Court finally disposes of the issues involved in this cause by the entry of an appropriate judgment upon the court’s prior finding.

Note. — Reported in 187 N. E. 2d 104.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7125 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7125

  To rename the portions of the Gateway National Seashore located on 
  Staten Island, New York, as the ``Senator James L. Buckley National 
                              Seashore''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2018

 Mr. Donovan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To rename the portions of the Gateway National Seashore located on 
  Staten Island, New York, as the ``Senator James L. Buckley National 
                              Seashore''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RENAMING PORTIONS OF THE GATEWAY NATIONAL SEASHORE.

    (a) Renaming.--The portions of the Gateway National Seashore 
located on Staten Island, New York shall be known as the ``Senator 
James L. Buckley National Seashore''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the portions of the 
Gateway National Seashore located on Staten Island, New York, is deemed 
to be a reference to the ``Senator James L. Buckley National 
Seashore''.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 19, 2023

No. 04-22-00901-CV

IN RE FAIR OAKS COUNTRY STORE, LLC

Original Proceeding1

ORDER

On December 30, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition, real parties in interests’ responses, relator’s reply, and this record, this court concludes 

relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is 

DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s Unopposed Motion to Extend or Clarify Time to 

File Reply Brief is DENIED as moot.

It is so ORDERED on April 19, 2023.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of April, 2023.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020CI14929, styled Stacy Marc Barrus as Turnover Receiver for Victor 

Farias and Integrity Aviation and Leasing, LLC, and Gina Perez, Lisa Aldaco, Olga Perez-Meredith, Viola Fraga, 

Elaine Castillo, Susan Perez, and Joann Aguilar vs. Fair Oaks Country Store, LLC, pending in the 150th Judicial 

District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Rosie Alvarado presiding.
#### James CEPHUS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D10-1918.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 8, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 18, 2010.

*184James Cephus, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE and CORTIÑAS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Johnson v. State,*974 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), *review granted,*17 So.3d 705 (Fla.2009). *See also Joyner v. State,*988 So.2d 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), *review granted,*17 So.3d 705 (Fla.2009).
#### Jabari S. GRAY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D12-1983.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 19, 2012.

Jabari S. Gray, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SHEPHERD, SUAREZ, and SALTER, JJ.

*1215PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Fernandez v. State,*910 So.2d 352, 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (recognizing that a defendant’s claim that his sentence was disproportionate is not cognizable on a motion to correct illegal sentence (citing *Lylcins v. State,*894 So.2d 302, 303 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005))); *see also Shivers v. State,*96 So.3d 1039 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1260

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 6301 Highway 58 in Harrison, Tennessee, 

as the ‘‘Claude Ramsey Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1260 EH

1 SECTION 1. CLAUDE RAMSEY POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 6301 Highway 58 in Harrison, 

4 Tennessee, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Claude 

5 Ramsey Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Claude Ramsey Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2007. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1260

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice’’. rison, Tennessee, as the ‘‘Claude Ramsey Post al Service located at 6301 Highway 58 in Har-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,241
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,262
<ALLOWANCES>                                       440
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,710
<PP&E>                                          20,749
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,873
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     32,220
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (47,176)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,278
<SALES>                                        402,455
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               402,455
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  382,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,471
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   230
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 675
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,056
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,056
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,056
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
#### Kenneth James MOUTON v. HEBERT’S OF HENDERSON, INC.

No. 10-788.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Dec. 8, 2010.

Andree Matherne Cullens, Dawn D. Bonnecaze, Taylor, Porter, Brooks & Phillips, L.L.P., Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendants/Appellees, Hebert’s Superette, Inc. Hebert’s of Henderson, Inc.

Bart J. Hebert, Reneé Z. Berard, Boyer, Hebert & Abels, LLC, Breaux Bridge, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant, Kenneth James Mouton.

Court composed of JIMMIE C. PETERS, JAMES T. GENOVESE, and DAVID E. CHATELAIN, Judges.

CHATELAIN,* Judge.

For the reasons set forth in the companion case in this consolidated matter, *Kenneth James Mouton v. Hebert’s Superette, Inc.,*10-787 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/8/10), 53 So.3d 561, 2010 WL 4967927, we reverse the trial court’s judgments dismissing Mouton’s claims on peremptory exceptions of immunity and remand to the trial court for consideration of the affirmative defenses asserted through the motions for summary judgment. Costs are assessed to the defendants, Hebert’s Superette, Inc. and Hebert’s of Henderson, Inc.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

*

 Honorable David E. Chatelain participated in this decision by appointment of the Louisiana Supreme Court as Judge Pro Tempore.
#### Meyer C. YASKIN, Appellant v. Allen J. ALLSTON and City of Chester and the Pennsylvania Railroad Company.

No. 13128.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 5, 1960.

Decided May 12, 1960.

Alan Kahn, Philadelphia, Pa. (Winokur *&*Kahn, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

James M. Marsh, Philadelphia, Pa. (LaBrum & Doak, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and FORMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record we find no error.

The Order of the District Court denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial will be affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Grim, 179 F.Supp. 757 (D.C.E.D.Pa. 1959).