alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                         975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CURRENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR ACCOMPANYING
NOTES THERETO.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Quarterly Report of MakeMusic, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/Afor the three and six months ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, Ronald B. Raup, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.January 25, 2007                                                                     /s/  Ronald B. Raup   Interim Chief Financial Officer
#### DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Petitioner, v. Bradford G. MEINKEN, Respondent.

No. 5D10-467.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Feb. 4, 2011.

Rehearing Denied March 11, 2011.

*630Robin F. Lotane, General Counsel, Michael J. Alderman, Acting General Counsel, and Heather Rose Cramer, Assistant General Counsel, Lake Worth, for Petitioner.

Stuart I. Hyman, of Stuart I. Hyman, P.A., Orlando, for Respondent.

GRIFFIN, J.

The Department of Highway Safety *&*Motor Vehicles petitions for a writ of cer-tiorari to review a decision of an appellate panel of the Ninth Judicial Circuit. The circuit court had issued its Order Granting Respondent, Bradford Meinken’s, Petition for Writ of Certiorari, quashing the hearing officer’s administrative decision upholding the suspension of his license for driving under the influence of alcohol. The panel held that Respondent had rebutted the presumption that the Intoxilyzer 8000 on which he performed his breath test was properly approved for use in Florida. We grant the writ and quash the decision of the circuit court on the authority of *Dep’t of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Berne,*49 So.3d 779 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari GRANTED; and decision QUASHED.

MONACO, C.J., and SAWAYA, J., concur.
#### STATE ex rel. Bobby Dewayne WALKER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0138.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re Walker, Bobby Dewayne; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Bienville, 2nd Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 33,154; to *468the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,228-KH.

Denied.
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of Bay Banks of Virginia, Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that based on their knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Austin L. Roberts, III                                   
|Austin L. Roberts, III, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                                             
|/s/ Deborah M. Evans                                         
|Deborah M. Evans, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer  

March 22, 2011



62
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                             June 30,
                                                 --------------------------------
                                                     1997                 1996
                                                 ------------          ----------
<S>                                              <C>                   <C>
Weighted Average Common and Common
   Equivalent Shares:

Weighted Average Common Stock
   Outstanding During the Period                   98,324,196          88,769,034

Weighted Average Common Equivalent
   Shares                                           2,173,553           7,999,184
                                                 ------------        ------------

                                                  100,497,749          96,768,218
                                                 ============         ===========

Net income                                       $  4,983,000         $11,393,000
                                                 ============         ===========

Net income per common share                      $       0.05         $      0.12
                                                 ============         ===========


FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                             June 30,
                                                 --------------------------------
                                                     1996                 1995
                                                 ------------          ----------
Weighted Average Common and Common
   Equivalent Shares:

Weighted Average Common Stock
   Outstanding During the Period                   98,324,196          88,769,034

Weighted Average Common Equivalent
   Shares                                           2,176,494           7,800,924
                                                 ------------        ------------

                                                  100,500,690          96,569,958
                                                 ============         ===========

Net income                                       $  4,983,000         $11,393,000
                                                 ============         ===========

Net income per common share                      $       0.05         $      0.12
                                                 ============         ===========
</TABLE>


                                      -15-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               8,219
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,365,259
<ALLOWANCES>                                        98,077
<INVENTORY>                                        507,922
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,978,542
<PP&E>                                           3,551,304
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,873,059
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,682,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,393,267
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            30,666
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,959,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,682,916
<SALES>                                          2,946,627
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,946,627
<CGS>                                            1,642,938
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,380,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   117,447
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  33,538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (228,219)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (228,219)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (228,219)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.08)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


<PAGE>





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  periodic  report on Form  10-KSB for the period  ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Report") of Industrial Minerals, Inc. (the "Company") I,
Robert A.  Stoutley,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  President  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant  to 18USC  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 25, 2004

/s/Robert A. Stoutley
------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert A. Stoutley, Chief Executive Officer and President


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24765]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12335 and <greek-i>12336]


Ohio Disaster <greek-i>OH-00023

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of OHIO dated 09/27/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 09/16/2010.
    Effective Date: 09/27/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/26/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/27/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Athens.
Contiguous Counties:
    Ohio: Hocking, Meigs, Morgan, Perry, Vinton, Washington.
    West Virginia: Wood.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere..................     5.000
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere...............     2.500
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere..................     6.000
  Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere...............     4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere....     3.625
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere.     3.000
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere........................................
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere.     3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12335 C 
and for economic injury is 12336 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are Ohio 
and West Virginia.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: September 27, 2010.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-24765 Filed 10-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NO T F O R P UB LICATIO N IN W EST' S H AWAI # I REP O RTS AND P ACIF IC REP O RTER

NO. CAAP-19-0000557 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
STATE OF HAWAI # I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. M ICHAEL T. WILLENBORG, Defendant-Appellant
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CRIMINAL NO. 1CPC-17-0001516) ORDER OF CORRECTION (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, for the court 1 ) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Summary Disposition Order of the court filed on February 23, 2024, is corrected by replacing "WILLENBOEG" with "WILLENBORG" in the case caption on page 1 at line 5 from the top so that as corrected, the text reads: "MICHAEL T. WILLENBORG, Defendant-Appellant".

The Clerk of the Court is directed to incorporate the foregoing change in the original summary disposition order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, February 23, 2024. FOR THE COURT: /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge

1 Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Wadsworth, JJ. Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-19-0000557 23-FEB-2024 11:36 AM Dkt. 122 OCOR
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-57985) of Docucorp International, Inc. of our
report dated October 24, 2003 relating to the financial statements, which
appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report dated October 24, 2003 relating to the financial statement schedule,
which appears in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Dallas, Texas
October 29, 2003


                                       20
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09

- 19

- 00460

- CR NO. 09

- 19

- 00461

- CR

__________________ DOMINIQUE JUDGE , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No s . 19

- 31133, 19

- 31134

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 21, 2019, the trial court sentenced Dominique Judge 1 on convictions for aggravated robbery. Judge filed a notice of appeal on December 23,
2019. The trial court entered certifications of the defendant’s right to appeal, in

wh ich the court certified that these are plea

- bargain cases and the defendant has no

1 The trial court’s certifications refer to Judge as “Dominique St Quincey Judge.”2 right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The district clerk has provided the
trial court’s certifications to the Court of Appeals. On December 31, 2019, we

notified the parties that we would dismiss the appeals unless the appellant
established grounds for continuing the appeals. No response has been filed. Because
the records do not contain certifications that show the defendant has the right of
appeal, we must dismis s the appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeals.

APPEALS DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on January 28, 2020 Opinion Delivered January 29, 2020 Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton , JJ.
#### Tex. & Pac. R’y Co. v. John Gwaltney and Wife.

(No. 3309.)

Appeal from Fannin County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 684. *Husband and wife may join in suit for damages for personal injuries; case stated.*On September 8, 1884, John Gwaltney brought this suit to recover of appellant damages for alleged personal injuries inflicted upon him and his wife while traveling as passengers on appellant’s road on the 16th day of September, 1883. On December 3, 1884, he amended his petition by making his wife a party plaintiff in the suit. Appellant pleaded in abatement that the wife was improperly joined as plaintiff. *603Also, that the joinder of the wife was the setting up of a new cause of action, and to this new cause of action the statute of limitation of one year was pleaded. Ver•dict and judgment were rendered for appellees for $100 ■damages. *Held:*Appellant’s plea in abatement was based upon the rule announced in R. R. Co. v. Burnett et ux. 61 Tex. 638, in which it was held to be reversible ■error to overrule a special exception to the joinder of the wife in an action for personal injury done her during marriage, she not being either a necessary or a proper party. *[Ante,*§ 181.] That case has been greatly modified, if not practically overruled, by the recent decision of our supreme court in the case of the San Antonio .Street R’y Co. v. Helm and wife, decided May 8, 1885, in which it is held that it is only in rare, exceptional cases that the joinder of the wife in such causes of action would be such error as that the overruling of a special ■exception, based on that ground, would cause a reversal of the judgment. This case is not of that exceptional ■character, and the plea in abatement was not maintain.able.

May 9, 1885.

§ 6'85. *Limitation; statute of, does not bar a married woman.*If the amended petition set up a new cause of action, which is not conceded, the statute of limitation of one year [R. S. art. 3202], pleaded thereto, could not .avail appellant, because pleaded against a married woman. The provision of the statute of limitation excepting married women from the operation thereof, during the disability of marriage, applies in this case, as in other cases .arising under the statute.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7768
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CARLOSE DEMOND ROBINSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:03-cr-00616-HMH-1) Submitted: March 28, 2007 Decided: April 12, 2007 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carlose Demond Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Reginald I. Lloyd, United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.1 See United States v. Cronic , 466 U.S. 648, 667 n.42 (1984).
2 See United States v Rouse , 410 F.3d 1005, 1009 (8th Cir. 2005); United States v. Wallace , 528 F.2d 863, 866 (4th Cir. 1976). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Carlose Demond Robinson appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 27 motion and his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. We note that a Rule 27 motion to perpetuate testimony is available only under the civil rules, which are inapplicable to a criminal proceeding such as this. While the district court had jurisdiction to entertain the Rule 33 motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence, 1we conclude that the motion fails on the merits. 2 Accordingly, we affirm. We deny the motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED