alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Department of the United States Air Force LogoBiography
                  United States Air Force031211-F-JZ509-357.JPGEffective Dates of Promotion
                      
                      Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force                                                                                                                                                                                                                           April 03, 1967
            Chief Master Sergeant PAUL WESLEY AIREYChief Master Sergeant of the Air Force Paul Wesley Airey was adviser to Secretary of the Air Force Harold Brown and Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. John P. McConnell on matters concerning welfare, effective utilization and progress of the enlisted members of the Air Force. He was the first chief master sergeant appointed to this ultimate noncommissioned officer position and was selected from among 21 major air command nominees to become the first chief master sergeant of the Air Force. He was formally installed by Gen. McConnell on April 3, 1967.
The chief was born in New Bedford, Mass. He entered military service after two years of high school in Quincy, Mass. In 1948 he obtained his high school equivalency certificate, and later completed 62 semester hours of study at McKendree College, Lebanon, Ill. His military schooling has included courses in communication mechanics and personnel management. He is a graduate of the Air Defense Command Noncommissioned Officer Academy.
Chief Airey spent much of his 27-year career as a first sergeant. During World War II, however, he served as an aerial gunner on B-24 bombers, and is credited with 28 combat missions in Europe. After he was forced to bail out of his flak-damaged aircraft, he was captured and became a prisoner of war in Germany from July 1944 to May 1945. During the Korean conflict, he was awarded the Legion of Merit while assigned at Naha Air Base, Okinawa. The award, an uncommon decoration for an enlisted man, was earned for creating a means of constructing equipment from salvaged parts that improved corrosion control of sensitive radio and radar components.
Before he became chief master sergeant of the Air Force, he was assigned to the Air Defense Command's 4756th Civil Engineering Squadron at Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla., where he was the unit's first sergeant. He retired Aug. 1, 1970.**MAJOR AWARDS AND DECORATIONS**
Legion of Merit with oak leaf cluster
Meritorious Service Medal
Air Medal with oak leaf cluster
Air Force Commendation Medal
POW Medal**PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS AND ASSOCIATIONS**
Air Force Memorial Foundation
Air University Foundation
Airmen Memorial Museum**EFFECTIVE DATES OF PROMOTION**
Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force April 3, 1967Department of the Air Force Logo
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Southern Arizona Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Tucson, Arizona. The purpose of the meeting is for the committee members to discuss committee protocols, operating guidelines, and project proposal requirements.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held October 19, 2010, beginning at 10 a.m. to approximately 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held at the Tucson Interagency Fire Center, 2646 E. Commerce Center Place, Tucson, AZ 85706. Send written comments to Jennifer Ruyle, RAC Coordinator, Southern Arizona Resource Advisory Committee, do Coronado National Forest, 300 W. Congress, Tucson, Arizona 85701 or electronically to                         *jruyle@fs.fed.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jennifer Ruyle, Coronado National Forest, (520) 388-8351.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public and opportunity for public input will be provided. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring Pub. L. 110-343 related matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting.

Dated: September 22, 2010.

Melissa Shafiqullah,

Acting Deputy Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest.

[FR Doc. 2010-24331 Filed 9-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
|                                   |   |                   |         | Exhibit      21 |
|----------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|--------------|-----------------|
|                                   |   |                   |         |            |
|                                   |   |                   |         |            |
|                                   |   |                   |         |            |
| SOUTH      JERSEY GAS COMPANY          |
| SUBSIDIARIES      OF REGISTRANT        |
| AS      OF DECEMBER 31, 2007           |
|                                   |   |                   |         |            |
|                                   |   |                   |         |            |
|                                   |   |                   |         |            |
|                                   |   | Percentage      of     |         |            |
|                                   |   | Voting      Securities |         | State      of   |
|                                   |   | Owned      by Parent   | Relationship | Incorporation   |
|                                   |   |                   |         |            |
| South      Jersey Gas Company          |   | Registrant             | Parent       | New      Jersey |
|                                   |   |                   |         |            |
| SJG      Capital Trust                 |   | 100                    | Subsidiary   | Delaware        |
| (inactive      as of November 5, 2003) |   |                   |         |            |
|                                   |   |                   |         |            |

----
858 A.2d 586

#### In the Matter of Fredrick C. HANSELMANN

No. 931 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Aug. 24, 2004.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of August, 2004, a Rule having been entered by this Court on May 28, 2004, pursuant to Rule *648214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Fredrick C. Hanselmann to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Fredrick C. Hanselmann is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa. R.D.E.
#### Mo. Pac. R’y Co. v. E. L. Teague.

(No. 3573.)

Error from Hill County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 780. *Variance between allegation and proof of ownership; joint owners must sue for injury to joint property; case stated.*E. L. Teague, surviving widow of N. B. Teague, deceased, brought thjs suit in her individual right to recover damages for injuries done to her land, by fire communicated from one of the engines of plaintiff in error. She alleged in her petition that the land injured was her property at the time of said injury. She recovered judgment for $330.50 damages. On the trial the proof showed that at the time of the injury complained of, the land was the property of N. B. Teague,, and was the homestead of said N. B. andE. L. Teague;-that N. B. Teague died after said fire occurred, leaving surviving him his widow, E. L. Teague, and two children, who have since his death continued to occupyfsaid land as a homestead. *Held:*The petition having alleged that the land, at the time of the injury, belonged to E. L. Teague, it devolved upon her to prove such allegation, which she failed to do, but on the contrary the proof showed that she did not individually own the same at that time. The allegation and the proof of ownership did not correspond, and it was error to render judgment for the plaintiff. [Denison v. League, 16 Tex. 107; Sayles’ Pl. §65; *ante,*§773.] Again, the surviving widow could not maintain a suit for damages *686to property belonging to the estate of her deceased husband, without making the children, who were joint owners thereof with her, parties to the suit. The property in this case being a homestead, does not, we think, alter this rule. [W. & W. Con. Rep. §§ 249, 299; *ante,*§ 618; Stachely v. Pierce, 28 Tex. 328; May v. Slade, 24 Tex. 205.]

June 24, 1885.

Reversed and remanded.
#### Ronnie D. WYNN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-5459.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 14, 2010.

Crystal McBee Frusciante, Jupiter, for Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition is granted and Ronnie D. Wynn is hereby afforded a belated appeal from the order denying amended motion for postconviction relief in Leon County Circuit Court case number 2005-CF-3373. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of the opinion will be provided to the clerk of the lower tribunal who shall treat it as a notice of appeal. Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and CLARK, JJ., concur. •
V 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1557 

For the relief of Elvira Arellano. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2007 

Mr. GUTIERREZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Elvira Arellano. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ELVIRA 

4 ARELLANO. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, for purposes of the Immigration and Nation7 ality Act, Elvira Arellano shall be eligible for issuance of 

8 an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of 

9 an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 

10 filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa 

11 under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status 

12 to lawful permanent resident. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1557 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Elvira Arellano en2 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified 

3 in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have entered 

4 and remained lawfully and shall, notwithstanding any pro5 vision of the Immigration and Nationality Act, be eligible 

6 for adjustment of status under section 245 of such Act 

7 as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Elvira Arellano, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi20 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

21 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na22 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1557 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Elvira Arellano shall not, 

2 by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi3 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
#### Bernard Cahn v. Nieves Salinas.

(No. 1553.)

January 30, 1884.

Appeal from Webb County.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 101. *Account sworn to; must be denied under oath.*Salinas sued Cahn for rent. Cahn pleaded in defense a counterclaim consisting of various items of merchandise sold and delivered to Salinas, and several items of money advanced to him. This account was verified by the affidavit of Cahn, in accordance with article 2266 of the Revised Statutes. Salinas did not deny the- justice of the account or any part thereof under oath, and on the trial was permitted, over the objections of Cahn, to introduce evidence impeaching its correctness. *Held,*1. The account was such an one as comes within the meaning of article 2266 of the Revised Statutes. The fact that money items appear therein, intermingled with items for merchandise, does not destroy its character as an account. 2. It could not be questioned or denied, except by written denial under oath, stating that the same is not just or true, in whole or in part, and if in part only, stating the items and particulars which are unjust.

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1565 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1565

  To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit the 
          conversion of leadership PAC funds to personal use.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2007

 Mr. Capuano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit the 
          conversion of leadership PAC funds to personal use.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Leadership PAC Limitation Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING CONVERSION OF LEADERSHIP PAC FUNDS TO PERSONAL USE.

    (a) Prohibition.--Section 313(b)(2) of the Federal Election 
Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 439(b)(2)) is amended by inserting after 
``subsection (a)'' the following: ``or funds of a leadership PAC 
described in paragraph (3)''.
    (b) Leadership PAC Defined.--Section 313(b) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 
439a(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Leadership pac defined.--In this subsection, the term 
        `leadership PAC' means a political committee which is directly 
        or indirectly established, maintained, or controlled by a 
        candidate for election for Federal office or an individual 
        holding Federal office but is not an authorized committee of 
        the candidate or individual, except that such term does not 
        include any political committee of a political party.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to 
elections occurring on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert T. WORD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-2688.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Argued Dec. 12, 2000.

Decided Jan. 2, 2001.

*492Before BAUER, POSNER, and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Pursuant to a warrant, police officers searched known felon Robert Word’s home both for items stolen during a recent burglary and illegal drugs. The search produced numerous firearms, which Word moved to suppress. In denying Word’s motion, the district court concluded that the search warrant was supported by probable cause and, alternatively, that the challenged evidence was admissible under the good-faith exception of *United States v. Leon,*468 U.S. 897, 104 S.Ct. 3405, 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984). Word conditionally pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm after being convicted of a felony, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), reserving his right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. We affirm.

In considering Word’s challenge to the search of his home, we first ask whether the district court clearly erred in determining that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies. *United States v. Spry,*190 F.3d 829, 834 (7th Cir.1999). Under *Leon,*the exclusionary rule will not bar evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant unless the magistrate who issued the warrant abandoned his neutral and detached role in issuing it, or unless “the officers were dishonest or reckless in preparing their affidavit or could not have harbored an objectively reasonable belief in the existence of probable cause.” *Leon,*468 U.S. at 926,104 S.Ct. 3405.

In the ordinary case, “an officer cannot be expected to question the magistrate’s probable-cause determination.” *United States v. Carter,*999 F.2d 182, 186 (7th Cir.1993). Here, the amount of firsthand and corroborating information in the *493supporting affidavit counters Word’s argument that this is one of those extraordinary situations in which the officers should have questioned the magistrate’s finding of probable cause. The affidavit states that, within the last week, a named individual observed property stolen from a local store at Word’s home and that, within the last seventy-two hours, a confidential informant purchased illegal drugs at Word’s home. Moreover, the named individual’s description of a stolen item she saw at Word’s home tallied with one of the items missing from the store. Although we agree with Word that the affidavit could have been drafted more precisely, there is no indication, nor does Word argue, that the officers were dishonest or reckless in preparing it or that the magistrate abandoned his detached and neutral role in issuing the warrant. Accordingly, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies and we need not decide whether the warrant was supported by probable cause.

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1930-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for State of Iowa (FEMA-1930-DR), dated July 29, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 20, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Thomas A. Hall, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Michael R. Scott as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-24499 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P