alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1722 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

601 Banyan Trail in Boca Raton, Florida, as the ‘‘Leonard W. Herman 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2007 

Mr. WEXLER (for himself, Ms. CASTOR, Mr. KLEIN of Florida, Mr. MILLER

of Florida, Mr. CRENSHAW, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. BUCHANAN, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mr. 

HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. BOYD of 

Florida, Mr. MAHONEY of Florida, Mr. FEENEY, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZBALART of Florida, Mr. MACK, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Ms. WASSERMAN

SCHULTZ, Mr. KELLER of Florida, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. PUTNAM, Mr. 

MEEK of Florida, Mr. MICA, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, and Mr. WELDON

of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 601 Banyan Trail in Boca Raton, Florida, 

as the ‘‘Leonard W. Herman Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LEONARD W. HERMAN POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 601 Banyan Trail in Boca 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1722 IH

1 Raton, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Leonard W. Herman Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Leonard W. Herman 

7 Post Office’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
#### The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY v. GEISMAR SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, LLC.

No. 2011-C-0747.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2011.

In re The Dow Chemical Company; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 579503; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1341.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant.
#### STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION & Development v. Willis Aldon EVERETT, et ux.

No. 2010-C-2216.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Everett, et ux., Willis Aldon; Everett, Helen Eloyce Horton; —Defendants); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Lincoln, 3rd Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 48,292; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,337-CA.

Denied.

KNOLL, J., would grant.
EXHIBIT23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM

We have issued our report dated March 3, 2006,accompanying the consolidated financial statements and scheduleincluded in the Annual Report of Journal Register Company on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 25, 2005. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statementof Journal Register Company on Form S-8 (File No. 333-27555), effectiveMay 21, 1997 pertaining to the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan of JournalRegister Company.

|  | /s/ Grant Thornton LLP |
|--|------------------------|

Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaMarch  03,2006

----
#### STATE ex rel. Arthur LEWIS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1233.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re Lewis, Arthur; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. C, No. 340-019; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-0640.

Denied.
#### C.B. ALLISON, Appellant, v. TREADCO, INC., Appellee.

No. 00-1692.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 8, 2001.

Decided Jan. 19, 2001.

*599Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

C.B. Allison declined a transfer to a new job position at Treadco, Inc. After Allison retired, he brought this action against Tre-adco asserting age discrimination and constructive discharge. The district court granted Treadco summary judgment, concluding Allison failed to create a genuine issue of material fact on the questions of constructive discharge and pretext. On appeal, Allison contends he presented a jury question on whether Treadco had created an intolerable work environment that forced him to resign and whether the transfer decision was a pretext for discrimination. We agree with the district court that Allison failed to put forth evidence to show an objective person would have felt forced to quit. There was no evidence the new position required Allison to perform duties he was incapable of performing, or that Treadco could reasonably foresee Allison would resign as a consequence of the reassignment. Indeed, the evidence showed Treadco made the reassignment to continue providing Allison with a company vehicle to drive to work after the manager, who allowed Allison to drive his company truck as a courtesy, was replaced with a new manager who needed to drive the manager’s truck. Further, the reassignment involved no decrease in salary or benefits, Allison had performed many of the duties of the new job before, and Allison did not ask to remain in his old position. Allison also failed to present evidence that Treadco’s reason for reassigning Allison was both incorrect and a pretext for intentional age discrimination. We thus affirm on the basis of the district court’s summary judgment opinion and order. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of WidePoint
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 ( the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ STEVE L. KOMAR Steve L.
KomarChief Executive Officer

/s/ JAMES T. MCCUBBIN  James T.
McCubbinChief Financial Officer

Date: April 11, 2008

F - 32
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Karen L.VanDerBosch, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of MakeMusic, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  November 9, 2007 By:  /s/ Karen L. VanDerBosch   Karen L.VanDerBosch   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement on
Form S-8 of  Lafayette  Bancorporation  (No.  333-89851)  of our  report,  dated
January  24,  2002,  on  the  consolidated  financial  statements  of  Lafayette
Bancorporation  as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2001, which report is incorporated by reference
in this Form 10-K.


                                        /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
                                        Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


March 18, 2002
Indianapolis, Indiana
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF CVF CORPORATION

1.  Canadian Venture Founders
      Leasing Corporation
2.  Dantec Electronics Limited
3.  Eastview Marketing One LLC
4.  Grand Island Marketing Two LLC
5.  Grand Island Marketing Inc.
6.  Biorem Technologies Inc.
7.  Gemprint Corporation
8.  Solaria Research Enterprises Ltd.
9.  Petrozyme Technologies, Inc.
10. Dantec Systems Corporation
11. Ecoval Inc.
12  TurboSonic, Inc.
13. Mindflight Corporation
14. Certicom Corp.
#### Henry Earl DONALDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D10-3062.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 22, 2010.

Henry Earl Donaldson, pro se.

LaROSE, Judge.

Henry Earl Donaldson appeals an order dismissing his motion for postconviction relief. *See*Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. The order specifically notes that the dismissal is without prejudice; it gives Mr. Donaldson thirty days to refile a facially sufficient motion. He did not do so. The order states that it is not appealable.

Mr. Donaldson also appeals a separate order denying him an extension of time to refile his motion for postconviction relief.

Neither order is appealable. Accordingly, we dismiss. *See, e.g., Ham v. State,*36 So.3d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (dismissing appeal because order denying motion for extension of time was not a final, appeal-able order); *Herron v. State,*34 So.3d 206 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (explaining that appellate courts do not have jurisdiction to review rule 3.850 nonfinal orders). Upon remand, the postconviction court should enter a final appealable order.

Dismissed.

KHOUZAM and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32


                                  CERTIFICATION
     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 as ADOPTED PURUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 the undersigned officer of Aquis Communications
Group, Inc., (the "Company"), does hereby certify to such officer's knowledge
that:

      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the
      "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:    August 14, 2003

                                                /s/ Alex E. Stillwell
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Name:  Alex E. Stillwell
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                                Aquis Communications Group, Inc.


                                                /s/ D. Brian Plunkett
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Name:  D. Brian Plunkett
                                                Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                                Aquis Communications Group, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Aquis Communications Group, Inc. and will be retained by Aquis
Communications Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and
is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         148,675
<SECURITIES>                                     4,865
<RECEIVABLES>                                  343,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,833)
<INVENTORY>                                    281,451
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               890,703
<PP&E>                                         513,039
<DEPRECIATION>                               (275,908)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,187,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          453,678
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,734
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,648,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,187,760
<SALES>                                      1,987,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,987,825
<CGS>                                        1,431,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,431,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 93,649
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (38,199)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             55,450
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,450
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
        

</TABLE>
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 19

- 00146

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV

- 2018

- 02457

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### M ICHAEL 

### S CHRADE A 

### / K 

### / A 

### M ICHAEL 

### R. S CHRADE 

### , Appellant

V



### .

A MERICAN 

### E XPRESS 

### N ATIONAL 

### B ANK 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On April 29, 2019, and May 13, 2019, we notified appellan t, in accordance with
rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless appellant
paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 44.3. Appellant ha s not done so.

See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).
Because appellant ha s n ot complied with a procedural requirement and the
Texas Supreme Cou rt’s order of August 28, 2015, 1 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: June 6, 2019

1 See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15

- 9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’ fees).
#### Willie GRAVES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-3320.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 22, 2011.

Matt Shirk, Public Defender, Fourth Judicial Circuit, and Matt Lufrano, Assistant Public Defender, Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking a belated appeal of the judgment and sentence rendered on or about May 17, 2011, in Duval County Circuit court case number 16-2010-CF-014407-AXXX-MA, is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall be furnished to the clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. The court notes that the Office of *1030the Public Defender has been appointed to represent petitioner on appeal.

VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 4.1

                            Form of Share Certificate

               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

                                     [LOGO]

                     CUSIP NO. [sample] Ukragro Corporation

                   AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK: 75,000,000 SHARES
                          PAR VALUE: $0.00001 PER SHARE

                               THIS CERTIFIES THAT

                                    [SAMPLE]

                   IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF __________________

Shares of UKRAGRO CORPORATION Common Stock transferable on the books of the
Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this
Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned
by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of
its duly authorized officers.

Dated:

---------------------------------          -------------------------------------
Secretary                                  President

                   [UKRAGRO CORPORATION CORPORATE SEAL NEVADA]

"The shares represented by this certificate have not been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933. The shares have been acquired for investment and may not
be offered, sold, or otherwise transferred in the absence of an effective
registration statement for the shares under the Securities Act of 1933, or a
prior opinion of counsel satisfactory to the issuer, that registration is not
required under the Act."

Signature must be guaranteed by a firm which is a member of a registered
national stock exchange, or by a bank (other than a savings bank), or a trust
company. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face
of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations.

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not on the above list.

For Value Received, _______ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Please print or typewrite name and address, including zip code or assignee)
<PAGE>
                                                                      Shares
----------------------------------------------------------------------
of the capital stock represented by the within certificate, and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint

                                                                      Attorney
----------------------------------------------------------------------
to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated:
      --------------------------

NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as
written upon the face of the certificate in every particular without alteration
or enlargement or any change whatever
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











Certification of President and (Chief Executive Officer)





In connection with the Annual Report of Industrial Minerals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory Bowes, President and (Chief Executive Officer) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  March 31, 2011
 
 /s/ Gregory Bowes
 Gregory Bowes
 President and CEO
Exhibit 21.1

              SUBSIDIARIES OF TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT RESTAURANT CORP.
              ----------------------------------------------------
                              AS OF MARCH 19, 1999
                              --------------------


Total Entertainment Restaurant Corp.
F&H Restaurant Corp.
TENT Finance, Inc.
Bailey's Sports Grille, Inc.
Fox & Hound, Inc.
Fox & Hound II, Inc.
Alabama Fox & Hound, Inc.
Fox & Hound of Colorado, Inc.
F&H Restaurant of Georgia, Inc.
Fox & Hound of Illinois, Inc.
Fox & Hound of Indiana, Inc.
F&H of Iowa, Inc.
Fox & Hound of Kansas, Inc.
Fox & Hound of Louisiana, Inc.
Fox & Hound of Michigan, Inc.
Fox & Hound of Missouri, Inc.
Fox & Hound of Nebraska, Inc.
Fox & Hound of North Carolina, Inc.
Fox & Hound of Ohio, Inc.
Pennsylvania Fox & Hound, Inc.
Fox & Hound of Tennessee, Inc.
Fox & Hound of Texas, Inc.
F&H Dallas, L.P.
Midway Entertainment, Ltd.
N. Collins Entertainment, Ltd.
505 Entertainment, Ltd.
N. Collins Beverage, Inc.
505 Beverage, Inc.
Fox & Hound of San Antonio, Ltd.
Fox & Hound of Lubbock, Ltd.
Fox & Hound of Houston, Ltd.
Fox & Hound of Lewisville, Ltd.