alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 11986 and # 11987]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Alabama dated 12/29/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         12/12/2009 through 12/18/2009. *Effective Date:*
                         12/29/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/01/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/29/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Escambia. *Contiguous Counties:* Alabama: Baldwin; Conecuh; Covington; Monroe. Florida: Escambia; Okaloosa; Santa Rosa. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere:
5.125( print page 1421)Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere:
2.562Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere:
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere:
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere:
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere:
3.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere:
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere:
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11986 6 and for economic injury is 11987 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Alabama, Florida. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: December 29, 2009. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2010-249 Filed 1-8-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Marvin CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D09-3721.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 27, 2011.

Marvin Carter, Hallandale, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*Affirmed. See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.315(a) (summary affirmance).

GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and MAY, JJ., concur.
#### Jack KOTTENBROOK and Angela Kottenbrook v. SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 2011-C-1293.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 2011.

In re Kottenbrook, Angela; Kotten-brook, Jack; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 10-1992; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,312-CA.

Denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.3

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Phillip Merrick, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
webMethods, Inc. (the Company), has executed this certification in connection
with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 (the
Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:
(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    |  |  |  |                                                                                          
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 18, 2003 |  |  |  | /S/ PHILLIP MERRICKName:   Phillip Merrick
Title:    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE ex rel. Willie RHODES, IV v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-2666.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Rhodes IV, Willie; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 482-302; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0756.

Denied. Moot.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Usurf America, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
S. Bass, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                    /s/ Ronald S. Bass
                                    ----------------------------
                                    Name: Ronald S. Bass
                                    Principal Accounting Officer
                                    March 31, 2005
|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/ Terry L. Stevens                                        |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Terry L. StevensSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| July 29, 2011                                           |   |

----
#### In re CONFIDENTIAL PARTY.

No. 2011-OB-2520.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 1, 2011.

In re Disciplinary Counsel; — Other; Applying For Petition for Transfer to Disability Inactive Status Office of Disciplinary Board, No. 09-DB-018.

Petition for transfer to disability inactive status denied

GUIDRY, J., dissents in part and would order a hearing regarding disability status.
#### STATE ex rel. Genaro GONZALES v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1200.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re Gonzales, Genaro; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 459-518; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-0531.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,497
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         427,283
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           410,644
<LOANS>                                      1,098,822
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,593,543
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,063,684
<SHORT-TERM>                                   113,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             19,558
<LONG-TERM>                                    286,499
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,742
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,593,543
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 19,037
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,598
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                26,635
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,409
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,477
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,158
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      210
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,969
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,787
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,082
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,082
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.00
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,454
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,105
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,209
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       56
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,363
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,363
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                   COHERENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                    (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED         NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                 SEPTEMBER 30,             SEPTEMBER 30,
                                             --------------------      --------------------
                                              1996         1995         1996         1995
                                             -------      -------      -------      -------
<S>                                          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>    
Net income                                   $ 2,445      $ 1,864      $ 6,843      $ 5,325
                                             =======      =======      =======      =======
 Average common shares outstanding            15,002       14,614       14,925       14,499
Average common share equivalents:
       Options                                   477          942          547          942
                                             -------      -------      -------      -------
Average number of common and
   common share equivalents outstanding       15,479       15,556       15,472       15,441
                                             =======      =======      =======      =======
 Net income per common share                 $  0.16      $  0.12      $  0.44      $  0.34
                                             =======      =======      =======      =======
</TABLE>

         Earning per share calculation for each period are based on the weighted
         average number of shares outstanding in each period. Therefore, the sum
         of the quarters do not necessarily equal the year to date earnings per
         share.

                                       12
#### Johnny LEE, Jr. and Michelle Lee, Individually and on Behalf of their Minor Child, Taylor Lee v. Michael FRIERSON, M.D.

No. 2010-CC-2808.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

In re Frierson M.D., Michael; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 577,512; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW1627.

Denied.
#### In re Colin A. FLEMING.

No. 2012-OB-2150.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 12, 2012.

In re Fleming, Colin A.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Petition to Transfer Bar Application Fee from July 2012 to February 2013.

Petition to transfer fees granted.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Targeted Genetics Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David J. Poston, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                                           
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 12, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    DAVID J. POSTON David J. Poston Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-11538

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

JEFFREY BLAKE ELLIS, Also Known as “Jealous”,

Defendant−Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

No. 4:16-CR-121-2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jeffrey Ellis was convicted of one charge of conspiring to possess 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 10, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-11538 Document: 00514233185 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/10/2017
No. 16-11538

2

methamphetamine with intent to distribute and was sentenced to 240 months 

in prison and a three-year term of supervised release. He maintains that the 

district court erred by denying him the sentencing adjustment for acceptance 

of responsibility and imposing the adjustment for obstruction of justice. 

Ellis has shown no clear error in connection with the imposition of the 

U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 adjustment for obstruction of justice. See United States v. 

Juarez-Duarte, 513 F.3d 204, 208 (5th Cir. 2008). The presentence report, on 

which the district court was entitled to rely, set forth facts leading to a reasonable inference that Ellis had tried to intimidate a codefendant. See United 

States v. Alaniz, 726 F.3d 586, 619 (5th Cir. 2013); United States v. Caldwell, 

448 F.3d 287, 290 (5th Cir. 2006). In light of those facts, the conclusion that 

Ellis obstructed justice is plausible and is not clearly erroneous. See JuarezDuarte, 513 F.3d at 208; U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1, comment.(n.4(A)). Ellis also has not 

shown that his is the exceptional case in which a defendant who receives the 

§ 3C1.1 adjustment for obstruction of justice should also receive the U.S.S.G.

§ 3E1.1(a) reduction for acceptance of responsibility. See United States v. 

Chung, 261 F.3d 536, 540 (5th Cir. 2001). 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-11538 Document: 00514233185 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/10/2017
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Journal Register Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 29, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jean B.
Clifton, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Jean B. Clifton

Jean B. Clifton
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
March 27, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Journal Register Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.36

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MITY Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul
R. Killpack, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date: July 30, 2003                     /s/ Paul R. Killpack
                                        -----------------------------------

                                        Paul R. Killpack
                                        Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or any
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 12.1
 EXHIBIT 12.1  STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO
OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
 LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST / LIBERTY PROPERTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Amounts in thousands except ratio amounts)
 Three months ended March 31, 2010Earnings before fixed charges:Income before allocation of noncontrolling interest and income from investments in unconsolidated
subsidiaries
    
    $
    34,150Add: Interest expense
    
    
    37,321Depreciation expense on capd interest
    
    
    406Amortization of deferred financing costs
    
    
    1,316Earnings before fixed charges
    
    $
    73,193Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    37,321Amortization of deferred financing charges
    
    
    1,316Capitalized interest
    
    
    166Fixed charges
    
    
    38,803Preferred share distributions
    
    
    Preferred unit distributions
    
    
    5,253Combined fixed charges
    
    $
    44,056Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.89Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
    
    
    1.66
#### Washington L. SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. LaSALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D09-2095.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 22, 2010.

John H. Ruiz, Miami, and Hector A. Peña, for appellant.

Butler & Hosch, Beth A. Norrow, Orlando, and Thomasina Moore, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, SHEPHERD, and LAGOA, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Washington Sanchez (“Sanchez”) appeals from a summary final judgment for foreclosure in favor of LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Merrill Lynch First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust (“LaSalle”). We reverse.

Sanchez defaulted under the terms of his mortgage, and LaSalle filed suit for mortgage foreclosure. In response, Sanchez filed an answer and affirmative defenses. Among other things, Sanchez alleged that LaSalle did not comply with the federal Truth-in-Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.

Thereafter, LaSalle responded to the affirmative defenses, and moved for summary judgment. Shortly before the hearing on the motion for summary judgment, Sanchez moved to add additional affirmative defenses. The trial court granted Sanchez’ motion, but then *sua sponte*struck all of Sanchez’ affirmative defenses. The trial court also granted LaSalle’s motion for summary judgment.

On appeal, Sanchez asserts that the trial court erred in striking his affirmative defenses and entering summary judgment. LaSalle contends the trial court properly struck the affirmative defenses because *228they were not specific or supported. We agree with Sanchez.

Generally, the striking of pleadings is not favored. *See, e.g., Menke v. Southland Specialties Corp.,*637 So.2d 285 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); *Costa Bella Dev. Corp. v. Costa Dev. Corp.,*445 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Florida Rules of Civil Procedure authorize a trial court *sua sponte*to strike a pleading which is “redundant, immaterial, impertinent or scandalous,” and, upon a party’s motion, a pleading which is sham. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.140(f), 1.150. A trial court, however, should not strike a pleading *sua sponte*on the ground that it is legally insufficient, or because the party subsequently may not be able to prove his or her allegations. *Bay Colony Office Bldg. Joint Venture v. Wachovia Mortgage Co.,*342 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

Here, the trial court, on its own motion, struck Sanchez’ affirmative defenses without finding them redundant, immaterial, impertinent, scandalous or a sham. Apparently, the trial court deemed the defenses to be lacking in specificity and support. Neither of these grounds warrants the *sua sponte*dismissal of Sanchez’ affirmative defenses.

Accordingly, we reverse the final summary judgment, and remand the cause for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.