alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-2.htm


    Exhibit
10.2

    


    NINTH
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

    


    


    This
Ninth Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of October
1, 2008, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Employer")
and Jose Luis Laparte ("Executive").

    


    Recitals

    


    
      	
              A)  

            	
              On
      June 3, 2004 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and
      between Employer and Executive.

            


    

    


    
      	
              B)  

            	
              Said
      Employment Agreement has been amended on eight prior
      occasions;

            


    

    


    
      	
              C)  

            	
              Employer
      and Executive now desire to amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth
      hereinbelow:

            


    

    


    Agreement

    


    
      	
              1.  

            	
              Section
      3.1 of the Agreement which
provides:

            


    

    


    3.1           Term.  The
term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on October 8, 2004 and
shall continue until October 7, 2008, unless sooner terminated or extended as
hereinafter provided (the "Employment Term").

    


    is hereby
amended, to provide as follows:

    


    3.1 Term.  The
term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on October 8, 2004 and
shall continue until October 7, 2009, unless sooner terminated or extended as
hereinafter provided (the "Employment Term").

    


    
      	
              2.  

            	
              All
      other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain
      unaltered and fully effective.

            


    

    


    


    Executed
in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.

    


    


    EXECUTIVE                                                                                                EMPLOYER

    PRICESMART, INC.

    


    Jose Luis
Laparte                                                                                 By:           

    


    ______________________                                                            Name:                      Robert M.
Gans

    Its:           Executive Vice
President
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Casey E. BATTS.

No. 2010-KK-2438.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 17, 2010.

In re Batts, Casey E.; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of W. Baton Rouge, 18th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 080324; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 11770.

Denied.
#### H. Block v. Charles Weiller & Son.

(No. 1727.)

Error from Milam County.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

*(Transferred from Austin. J*

§ 503. *Citation not under seal will not support judgment by default; record must show that citation was under seal.*Weiller & Son recovered a judgment by default against Block, from which judgment Block prose*450cutes this writ of error. The error relied on for reversal is, that there was no seal to the citation. It appears by the record that the citation was attested as follows: “Witness, W. D. Paden, Clerk of the County Court of Milam County. Given under my hand and seal of office at Cameron, this the 31st day of January, A. D. 1884. W. D. Paden, Clerk 0. 0. Milam County.” While the clerk states that there was a seal to the citation, the transcript fails to show the fact that there was. There is neither a copy of the seal nor a scroll in place thereof in the transcript. To support the judgment by default, the citation must have been authenticated by the seal of the court, and this authentication must appear affirmatively in the record, and will not be presumed. This writ of error is 'for the purpose of correcting errors in the court below, and is a direct proceeding for that purpose, not collateral to any question involved in the case, and therefore the cases of Earle v. Thomas, 14 Tex. 583, and Glenn v. Ashcraft, 4 Tex. Law Review, 14, are not applicable.

December 10, 1884.

Reversed and remanded.
#### Javier Belmontes LOPEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D09-3247.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 2, 2011.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and James W. Melntire, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Hyndman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*Affirmed. See Williams v. State,*40 So.3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

POLEN, HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 24
                                                 ----------



                            SOUTH JERSEY GAS COMPANY

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


     Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer or director, or
both, as the case may be, of South Jersey Gas Company, a New Jersey
corporation, does hereby appoint Charles Biscieglia, David A. Kindlick and
George L. Baulig, and each of them, severally, as his or her true and lawful
attorneys or attorney to execute in his or her name, place and stead, in his
or her capacity as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of said
corporation, its Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 on
Form 10-K, pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
any and all amendments thereto and instruments necessary or incidental in
connection therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange
Commission; and does hereby provide that each of said attorneys shall have
power to act hereunder with or without the other said attorneys, and shall have
full power of substitution and resubstitution and that each of said attorneys
shall have full power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf
of the undersigned in any and all capacities every act whatsoever required to
be done in the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he or she
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and approving the acts of said
attorneys and each of them.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this instrument, this
27th day of March 1998.



                                                /s/ Charles Biscieglia
                                                Charles Biscieglia, President


                                                /s/ Anthony G. Dickson
                                                Anthony G. Dickson, Director



                                                /s/ Clarence D. McCormick
                                                Clarence D. McCormick, Director



                                                _______________________________
                                                Peter M. Mitchell, Director



                                                /s/ Frederick R. Raring
                                                Frederick R. Raring, Director





                                                 Exhibit 24
                                                 ----------


Power of Attorney -- 10-K                                   Page 2 of 2




                                                /s/ Shirli M. Vioni
                                                Shirli M. Vioni, Director




                                                /s/ David A. Kindlick
                                                David A. Kindlick, Vice
                                                President, Rates and Budgeting



                                                /s/ George L. Baulig
                                                George L. Baulig, Secretary
#### M.V., the Father, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, and The Guardian ad Litem Program, Appellees.

No. 3D09-3013.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 23, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 12, 2010.

Thomas J. Butler, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Karla Perkins, Children Legal Service Appellate Counsel; Hillary S. Kambour, Guardian ad Litem Program Appellate Counsel, for appellees.

Before GERSTEN, SHEPHERD and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Dep’t of Health and, Rehabilitative Servs. v. M.B.,*701 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 1997); *T.V. v. Dep’t of Children and Families,*905 So.2d 945 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 24 87

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Om ar En riq ue Erazo -Ma rti ne z ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Peti ti on er

v. Je ffer so n B . Ses si on s, II I, Att or ne y Gene ral of t he Uni te d S ta te s 1 ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lResp on de nt

__ __ __ __ __ __ Pet it io n fo r Rev ie w of a n Ord er o f th e Bo ard of I m

m ig rat io n Ap pe al s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: May 5, 20 17 Fi le d: May 9, 20 17 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re RI LEY, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.
Hon du ran ci ti zen Om ar Enri qu e Erazo -Ma rti ne z pe t i t io ns fo r rev ie w of an or de r of th e Bo ard of Im

m ig rat io n App eal s di sm is si ng hi s ap pe al fro m a de ci si on of
Je ffer so n B. Ses si on s, III ha s be en ap po in te d to se rv e as Att or ne y Gen eral of 1 th e Uni te d St at es an d au to m at ic al ly is su bs ti tu te d as res po nd en t pu rs ua nt to Fed eral Ru le of Ap pe ll at e Pro cedur e 4 3( c)(2 ).an im

m ig rat io n jud ge de nyin g hi s ap pl ic at io n fo r can cel la ti on of rem ov al un de r 8 U
. S

. C

. § 12 29 b( b) (1 ). W e co nc lu de th e arg um en ts he pr es en ts to th is co ur t ar e un av ai li ng , and th us we de ny the pe ti ti on . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
858 A.2d 588

#### In the Matter of Andrew F. MALONE.

No. 953 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 1, 2004.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 1st day of September, 2004, the Joint Petition for Temporary Suspension is granted, Andrew F. Malone is placed on temporary suspension, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. The matter is hereby referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.
#### Gloria CLAY v. OUR LADY OF LOURDES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC.

No. 2011-C-1797.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center Inc.; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Office of Workers’ Comp. — Dist. 04, No. 06-03500; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 09-1219.

Granted.

2
627 A.2d 1129

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JACKIE HUNTER.

April 29, 1993.

ORDER

Motion for summary disposition is granted, and the judgment of the Appellate Division (A-5637-90) is summarily modified and the matter remanded to the Law Division for consideration in light of *State v. Rosado*131 *N.J.*423, 621 A.2d 12 (1993).
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Cecil A. Brooks, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of  Cornerstone  Ministries
Investments, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  March 28, 2004               s/Cecil A. Brooks
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Cecil A. Brooks, Chairman of the Board,
                                    President, Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Nov ember 1 6 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk Nov ember 1 6 , 2020

1 6 2 235 ( 25 )

In re JACKSON

.

______________________________________

DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 162 235

v COA: 353 559

WAYNE CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE

,

Defendant

- Appellee

.

_______ ______________________________ _ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to suspend fees is considered and it is

DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil act ion be liable

for filing fees.

Appellant is not required to pay an initial partial fee. However, for the appeal to

continue, within 21 days of the date of this order, appellant shall submit a copy of this order

and refile the copy of the pleadings retur ned with this order as acknowledgement of his

responsibility to pay the $375.00 filing fee. Failure to do so shall result in the appeal being

administratively dismissed.

If appellant timely complies with this order, monthly payments shall be made to the

Department of Corrections in the amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to appellant’s

account until the payments equal the balance due of $375.00. That amount shall then be

remitted to this Court.

Generally, appellant may not file a new civil actio n or appeal in this Court until the

filing fee in this case is paid in full. MCL 600.2963(8).

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to appellant and return

a copy of appellant’s pleadings with this order.
Exhibit 32.2

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 906**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terry L. Stevens, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ TERRYL.STEVENS                                                |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Terry L. StevensSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| November 7, 2008                                        |   |

 

 

46
Exhibit (11) - Statement Re:  Computation of Earnings Per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                               Three Months Ended         Six Months Ended    
                              June 30,     June 30,     June 30,     June 30,
                                1997         1996         1997         1996   
<S>                          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Primary:
Average shares outstanding    2,076,929    2,069,304    2,073,964    2,068,763
Net effect of dilutive
  stock options - based on
  the treasury stock method
  using average market price     48,148       16,112       51,047       15,179

 Totals                       2,125,077    2,085,416    2,125,011    2,083,942

Net income                   $  684,019   $  423,774   $1,196,537   $  778,931

Per share amount             $     0.32   $     0.20   $     0.56   $     0.37

Fully diluted:
Average shares outstanding    2,076,929    2,069,304    2,073,964    2,068,763
Net effect of dilutive stock
  options - based on the
  treasury stock method using
  average market price which
  is greater than quarter-end
  market price                   48,242       16,136       51,567       15,955

Totals                        2,125,171    2,085,440    2,125,531    2,084,718

Net income                   $  684,019   $  423,774   $1,196,537   $  778,931

Per share amount             $     0.32   $     0.20   $     0.56   $     0.37
</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Rhonda Jean Farmer, Appellant

No. 06-14-00026-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 124th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 42604-

A). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Rhonda Jean Farmer, has adequately indicated her inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 5, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### STATE ex rel. Stephen LANPHIER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2012-KH-2154.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 12, 2012.

In re Lanphier, Stephen; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 20155-03; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit.

The application is transferred to the 3rd Circuit, Court of Appeal with instructions to the judge(s) to act on relator’s writ application as relator shows by a confirmation letter from the Court of Appeal that the application was submitted on or about October 20, 2011. The Court of Appeal is ordered to provide this Court with a copy *879of its judgment. A copy of the application is attached.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the: (i) Registration Statement
on Form S-4 (No. 333-57891) and related Prospectus of Crescent Operating, Inc.
(the "Company"); (ii) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-29069)
related to the Company's Stock Incentive Plan; and (iii) Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (No. 333-43291) related to the Company's Management Stock Incentive
Plan of our report dated March 29, 2001, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and related schedule of Crescent Operating, Inc. included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Dallas, Texas
April 11, 2001
644 A.2d 611

#### PAULA WITCHER v. NEW LISBON DEVELOPMENT CENTER.

May 26, 1994.

ORDER

Leave to appeal is granted, and the decision of the Appellate Division is summarily modified to the extent that the remand ordered shall be to the Merit System Board rather than to the Office of Administrative Law.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Mindesta, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K

A-2

 for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



3. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:

July 20,

 2015



By: /s/ Lucie Letellier

Lucie Letellier

Chief Financial Officer