alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Certification
of


Central
Coast Bancorp


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Regarding
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2005




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Central Coast Bancorp, a California corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify that:
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|1. | The
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September  30, 2005
(the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | Information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
November 4, 2005                                                                                     /s/ NICK VENTIMIGLIA
                                                                                                                              Nick Ventimiglia
                                                                                                                              Chief Executive Officer

Date:
November 4, 2005                                                                                     /s/ JAYME C. FIELDS
                                                                                                                              Jayme C. Fields
                                                                                                                              Senior Vice President and
                                                                                                                              Chief Financial Officer

|A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Central Coast Bancorp and will be retained by Central Coast Bancorp
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 31.1**I, Donald L. Grill, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fentura Financial, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting        Dated:  May 11, 2007 /s/ Donald L. Grill   Donald L. Grill   Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations included in
           the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and
           is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial
           Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                         <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<CASH>                                           32,514
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   481,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              9,286,450
<PP&E>                                          535,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                  222,315
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                9,286,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         1,598,025
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                     17,594,865
<OTHER-SE>                                   (9,906,440)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  9,286,450
<SALES>                                         601,690
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                665,632
<CGS>                                             8,174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   458,274
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              4,421,180
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,441,933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (6,396,785)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1,543
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (6,398,328)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (6,398,328)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    ($0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    ($0.67)


</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1737 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 

design, planning, and construction of permanent facilities for the GREAT 

project to reclaim, reuse, and treat impaired waters in the area of 

Oxnard, California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2007 

Mrs. CAPPS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the design, planning, and 

construction of permanent facilities for the GREAT 

project to reclaim, reuse, and treat impaired waters in 

the area of Oxnard, California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘City of Oxnard Water 

5 Recycling and Desalination Act of 2007’’. 

mmaher on PROD1PC60 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1737 IH

1 SEC. 2. OXNARD, CALIFORNIA, WATER RECLAMATION, 

2 REUSE, AND TREATMENT PROJECT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

4 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (title XVI of Public 

5 Law 102–575; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by add6 ing at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘SEC. ll. OXNARD, CALIFORNIA, WATER RECLAMATION, 

8 REUSE, AND TREATMENT PROJECT. 

9 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera10 tion with the City of Oxnard, California, may participate 

11 in the design, planning, and construction of Phase I per12 manent facilities for the GREAT project to reclaim, reuse, 

13 and treat impaired water in the area of Oxnard, Cali14 fornia. 

15 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the costs 

16 of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 

17 25 percent of the total cost. 

18 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide 

19 funds for the following: 

20 ‘‘(1) The operations and maintenance of the 

21 project described in subsection (a). 

22 ‘‘(2) The construction, operations, and mainte23 nance of the visitor’s center related to the project 

24 described in subsection (a). 

25 ‘‘(d) SUNSET OF AUTHORITY.—The authority of the 

26 Secretary to carry out any provisions of this section shall 

mmaher on PROD1PC60 with BILLS

3 

•HR 1737 IH

1 terminate 10 years after the date of the enactment of this 

2 section.’’. 

3 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

4 in section 2 of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 

5 Adjustment Act of 1992 is amended by inserting after the 

6 last item the following: 

‘‘Sec. ll. Oxnard, California, water reclamation, reuse, and treatment 

project.’’. 

Æ 

mmaher on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certificationof Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuantto Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Michael H. Owens,certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of iVOW, Inc.

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.               Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b.              Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c.               Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.               Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data; and

 

b.              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: March 31, 2006

 

 
| /s/ Michael H. Owens        |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| **Michael H. Owens**        |   |
| **Chief Executive Officer** |   |

 

----
#### STATE ex rel. Terrance ANDERSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0777.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2011.

In re Anderson, Terrance; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 08-3682; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-KH-41.

Denied.
644 A.2d 581

#### IN THE MATTER OF RUSSELL E. PAUL, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

July 7, 1994.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that RUSSELL E. PAUL of WOOD-BURY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1966, be publicly reprimanded for violating *RPC*1.1(a) (gross neglect), *RPC*1.4(a) (failure to keep client reasonably informed) and *RPC*8.4(c) (misrepresentation to client regarding status of a matter), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review are adopted and RUSSELL E. PAUL is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Order entered March 26, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00245-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.C., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13-00345W

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this termination of parental rights appeal is overdue. By postcard 

dated March 13, 2015, we notified Court Reporter Martha Grant that the reporter’s record was 

overdue in this case. We directed Ms. Grant to file the record within ten days and cautioned her 

that any request for an extension must be submitted in writing explaining the extraordinary 

reasons for the delay. To date, Ms. Grant has not responded.

Accordingly, we ORDER Martha Grant, Official Court Reporter for the 304th Judicial 

District Court, to file, within TEN DAYS, either (1) the reporter’s record; or (2) written 

verification that appellant has not requested the record. 

Because this is a parental termination case, we remind both the trial court and Ms. Grant 

that it is the responsibility of the Court Reporter to prepare, certify, and timely file the reporter’s 

record and that the trial court must direct Ms. Grant to immediately commence the preparation of 
the reporter’s record. The trial court must arrange a substitute reporter if necessary. TEX. R.

APP. P. 28.4(b)(1).

We notify appellant that if we receive verification that no request for the record has been 

made, the appeal will be submitted without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of this order, by electronic 

transmission, to the following persons:

Honorable Andrea Martin 

Presiding Judge of the 304th Judicial District Court

Ms. Martha Grant

Official Court Reporter, 304th Judicial District Court

All parties

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1722 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 307
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1722

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2007

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                             August 1, 2007

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 601 Banyan Trail in Boca Raton, Florida, as the ``Leonard W. Herman 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEONARD W. HERMAN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 601 Banyan Trail in Boca Raton, Florida, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Leonard W. Herman Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Leonard W. 
Herman Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 307

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1722

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 601 Banyan Trail in Boca Raton, Florida, as the ``Leonard W. Herman 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 1, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### Calvin WITHERS, PFC., Appellant, v. ARKANSAS HIGHWAY POLICE; Arkansas Highway & Transportation Department; Captain George Coff-man; Captain Don Hastings; Lieutenant Jan Weinberg, Appellees.

No. 99-4150.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 17, 2001.

Filed Jan. 23, 2001.

*615Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Calvin Withers appeals from the district court’s1 order granting summary judgment to defendants in this civil action in which he claimed employment discrimination and retaliation, and violation of his civil rights. Upon careful review of the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment for the reasons explained in its order. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1725 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 

Rancho California Water District Southern Riverside County Recycled/ 

Non-Potable Distribution Facilities and Demineralization/Desalination 

Recycled Water Treatment and Reclamation Facility Project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2007 

Mrs. BONO (for herself, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr. ISSA, and Mr. CALVERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the Rancho California 

Water District Southern Riverside County Recycled/NonPotable Distribution Facilities and Demineralization/Desalination Recycled Water Treatment and Reclamation 

Facility Project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mmaher on PROD1PC60 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1725 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rancho California 

3 Water District Recycled Water Reclamation Facility Act 

4 of 2007’’. 

5 SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

7 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102– 

8 575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by 

9 adding after section 16ll the following: 

10 ‘‘SEC. 16ll. RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT 

11 PROJECT, CALIFORNIA. 

12 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera13 tion with the Rancho California Water District, California, 

14 may participate in the design, planning, and construction 

15 of permanent facilities for water recycling, 

16 demineralization, and desalination, and distribution of 

17 non-potable water supplies in Southern Riverside County, 

18 California. 

19 ‘‘(b) COST SHARING.—The Federal share of the cost 

20 of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 

21 25 percent of the total cost of the project or $20,000,000, 

22 whichever is less. 

23 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary 

24 under this section shall not be used for operation or main25 tenance of the project described in subsection (a).’’. 

mmaher on PROD1PC60 with BILLS

3 

•HR 1725 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of items in 

2 section 2 of Public Law 102–575 is amended by inserting 

3 after the item relating to section 16ll the following: 

‘‘Sec. 16ll. Rancho California Water District Project, California.’’. 

Æ 

mmaher on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
#### Veronica BOWMAN and Gregory Bowman v. The RIVERSIDE COURT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION PHASE, II, INC., Essex Insurance Company, and Air Conditioning Ambulance Service, Inc.

No. 2011-CC-1876.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

In re Essex Insurance Company; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. P, No. 678-619; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. ll-C-718.

Granted and remanded to court of appeal for briefing, argument, and opinion.