alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Harmon *v.*Arthur.

[No. 19,618.

Filed April 25, 1963.]

*Dix, Dix, Patrick & Ratcliffe*and *D. Joe Gabbert,*both of Terre Haute, for appellant.

*527
      *N. George Nasser,*of Terre Haute, and *George Taylor,*of Sullivan, for appellee.

Ryan, J.

The appellee, who was the plaintiff below, filed his complaint for alleged personal injuries against the appellant, defendant below. The cause was submitted to a jury, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the appellant, defendant below. Consistent judgment was rendered thereon; a motion for a new trial was filed by the appellee, and such motion for a new trial was sustained by the court. Appellant now appeals under the authority of §2-3201 (b), Burns’ 1946 Replacement, 1962 Supplement.

We have heretofore established the requirement that in sustaining a motion for a new trial the trial court must state in writing its specific reasons for granting such new trial. *Rife*v. *Karns*(1962), 133 Ind. App. 226, 181 N. E. 2d 239; *Newsom*v. *Pennsylvania Railroad Co. et al.*(1962), 133 Ind. App. 582, 181 N. E. 2d 240; *Rans*v. *The Pennsylvania Railroad Co.*(1962), 133 Ind. App. 592, 181 N. E. 2d 644; *Bailey*v. *Kain*(1963), 134 Ind. App. 238, 187 N. E. 2d 366.

In this particular instance, the trial court, while not required to do so at the time, did state in a very general way the reasons for granting the motion for a new trial. However, since the procedure had not been established at the time the court did so, and in fairness to the parties and the court, we feel that the matter should be referred back to the trial court with instructions to enter upon the trial docket within the next thirty (30) days a statement in writing setting forth with particularity the specific reasons upon which the trial court based its decision to sustain the motion for a new trial.

*528Upon such entry, the clerk of the trial court shall enter the same in the proper order book and certify a copy with the appropriate clerk’s certificate to the clerk of this court. Such statement, when certified and received by the clerk of this court, shall become a part of the record in this cause.

Cooper, C. J., and Carson and Clements, JJ., concur.

Note. — Reported in 189 N. E. 2d 719.
News United States Air Force
 Avoid paying more for prescription drugsPublished Dec. 2, 2015
                        
                        By TRICARE.mil Staff
                        
                        
                        Communications Division, Defense Health Agency
                **FALLS CHURCH, Va. (AFNS) --**
                This December, TRICARE beneficiaries can take action to avoid paying more for some prescription drugs. Beneficiaries filling a prescription for a select brand name maintenance drug at a retail pharmacy may need to move their prescription to either a military pharmacy or TRICARE Pharmacy Home Delivery. If not, they may have to pay full cost for their prescription.
Beneficiaries can move their prescriptions by contacting the TRICARE pharmacy contactor, Express Scripts (ESI) at 1-877-363-1303 or by using ESI’s secure online portal.
If beneficiaries are an active-duty service member, live overseas or have other prescription drug coverage and can continue using retail pharmacies with no changes to their current copays.
The new rule began Oct. 1, but allows you to get two 30-day refills of an affected drug from a retail pharmacy. For many, those two refills will run out in December and their next prescription refill needs to be through Home Delivery or at a military pharmacy.
If  taking an affected drug, beneficiaries should have received several notifications from ESI. They can also check by calling ESI at 1-877-363-1303.
TRICARE Pharmacy Home Delivery is a safe, convenient and low cost option to get maintenance drugs. Beneficiaries can save up to $176 a year for each brand name drug they switch from retail to home delivery. If beneficiaries want to use a military pharmacy, they need to check first to see if they carry their prescription.
For more information about this change to TRICARE’s pharmacy benefit, visit RxNewRules. If interested in learning more about the TRICARE pharmacy benefit, listen to the upcoming TRICARE pharmacy webinar -- featuring Dr. George Jones, the chief of pharmacy operations at the Defense Health Agency. Tune in on Dec. 9 at noon EST. The webinar does not require prior registration.prescription 



Pharmacy 



AF family 



TRICARE
649 A.2d 858

#### IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL T. HENCHY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

November 30, 1994.

ORDER

MICHAEL T. HENCHY of DOVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1968, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

*184It is ORDERED that MICHAEL T. HENCHY is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by MICHAEL T. HENCHY, pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6, shall be restrained from disbursement except upon application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 28 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BOYD BROS. TRANSPORTATION INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         409,453
<SECURITIES>                                   250,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,810,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (310,851)
<INVENTORY>                                    421,720
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,068,346
<PP&E>                                      92,495,474
<DEPRECIATION>                              28,380,749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              99,311,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,534,036
<BONDS>                                     33,019,283
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,082
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,799,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                99,311,845
<SALES>                                     97,628,842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            97,628,842
<CGS>                                       93,933,946
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               93,933,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,889,183
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                805,713
<INCOME-TAX>                                   431,102
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            374,611
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   374,611
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      31.2





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14**


**OF
      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**





I,
      D.
      Brian Karr, Chief Financial Officer of Cardinal Communications, Inc. (the
      "Company"), certify that:





I
      have
      reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Cardinal Communications,
      Inc.





Based
      on
      my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual
      Report.





Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods,
      presented in the report.





I
      am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and
      have:





(a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which the periodic report is being prepared;





(b)
      [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained
      in
      SEC Release 34-47986]; and





(c)
      disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Company's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
      and





I
      have
      disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
      financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and to the audit committee of
      the
      Board of Directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):





(j)
      all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
      financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
      Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
      information; and





(ii)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial
      reporting.








Dated:
                December 1, 2006
              
              /s/
                D. Brian Karr
              ------------------------------------
              Name:
                D. Brian Karr
              Chief
                Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          73,800
<SECURITIES>                                 5,423,800
<RECEIVABLES>                                  926,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,577,400
<PP&E>                                       2,028,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,625,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          439,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,960,600
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,225,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,186,400
<SALES>                                      1,550,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,967,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,530,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                437,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   166,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   270,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A of Senesco Technologies, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the
undersigned, Leslie J. Browne, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)           The
Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Senesco
Technologies, Inc.





Dated:  October
      25, 2010
              /s/ Leslie J. Browne *Leslie
      J. BrownePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)





*  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. Cynthia BRIDGES, Secretary of the Department of Revenue, State of Louisiana.

No. 2011-C-1971.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

In re Cynthia Bridges, Secretary of the Department of Revenue, State of Louisiana; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 529766; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1860.

Denied.
645 A.2d 100

#### IN THE MATTER OF ALAN SCOTT MILLER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

July 28, 1994.

ORDER

ALAN SCOTT MILLER of KEY BISCAYNE, FLORIDA who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1973, having pleaded guilty to engaging in monetary instruments and property derived from specified unlawful activity, in violation of 18 *U.S.C.A*§ 1957 and TO two counts of making false statements, in violation of 18 *U.S.C.A.*§ 1001, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*1:20 — 6(b)(1), ALAN SCOTT MILLER is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that ALAN SCOTT MILLER be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that ALAN SCOTT MILLER comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys.
#### Henry S. KEEL, Appellant, v. CENTRAL MORTGAGE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 4D08-3106.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 25, 2009.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 5, 2010.

Kraig S. Weiss of Silverberg *&*Weiss, P.A., Weston, for appellant.

Les C. Shields of Ben-Ezra *&*Katz, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

*840PER CURIAM.

*Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee,*377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

POLEN, MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1647 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to include podiatrists as 

physicians for purposes of covering physicians services under the Medicaid Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2007 

Ms. DEGETTE (for herself, Mr. CASTLE, Mr. BECERRA, and Mr. KIRK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to include 

podiatrists as physicians for purposes of covering physicians services under the Medicaid Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUDING PODIATRISTS AS PHYSICIANS 

4 UNDER THE MEDICAID PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1905(a)(5)(A) of the So6 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(a)(5)(A)) is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘section 1861(r)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘para8 graphs (1) and (3) of section 1861(r)’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1647 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to services furnished on or after 

3 January 1, 2008. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
#### STATE ex rel. Marcus W. ANDERSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-1493.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 2011.

In re Anderson, Marcus W.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 6611-08; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 11-106.

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 61471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24964]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-2892-000]


Lavalley Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

September 29, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Lavalley Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 19, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#11575443525e7f7d787f74426461617e636551777463723f767e67"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f090a1d0c00212326212a1c3a3f3f203d3b0f292a3d2c61282039">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24964 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE ex rel. Larry MACK v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-OK-1234.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 2011.

In re Mack, Larry; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. 0, No. 06060900; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 0339.

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.3
                             ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                      OF
                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                             FISHER COMPANIES INC.



     THESE ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT of the Articles of Incorporation of FISHER
COMPANIES INC. a Washington corporation, are hereby executed and delivered for
filing in accordance with the provisions of Section 23B.10.060 of the Washington
Business Corporation Act:

     1.   The name of the corporation is FISHER COMPANIES INC.

     2.   Article I of the Articles of Incorporation of the corporation is
hereby amended to read as follows:

                                   ARTICLE I
                                     Name

          The name of the corporation is FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

     3.   The above amendment was adopted on February 14, 2001.

     4.   The above amendment was duly approved by the Board of Directors of the
corporation, without shareholder action, in accordance with the provisions of
Section 23B.10.020(5) of the Washington Business Corporation Act. Shareholder
action was not required to effect this amendment.

     DATED this 7th day of March, 2001.

                                    FISHER COMPANIES INC.

                                    By /s/ William W. Krippaehne, Jr.
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       William W. Krippaehne, Jr.
                                       Its President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Terri DAVIS, et al. v. AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION.

No. 2010-CC-2379.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Wyeth LLC; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. I, Nos. 94-11684, 94-12699, 95-*3863139; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-C-1404.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant.