alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7143 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to modernize social security 

account numbers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2018 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to modernize 

social security account numbers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Num5 ber Modernization Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PUBLIC LISTING OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT 

7 NUMBERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 205(c)(2)(B) of the Social 

9 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)(B)) is amended by add10 ing at the end the following: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7143 IH

1 ‘‘(iv) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in2 cluding subparagraph (C)(viii) of this paragraph and sec3 tion 552a of title 5, United States Code, the Commissioner 

4 of Social Security shall maintain a complete public listing 

5 of each social security account number that has been as6 signed to any individual at any time.’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) shall take effect on October 1, 2028. 

9 SEC. 3. PHASEOUT OF PAPER SOCIAL SECURITY CARDS. 

10 Section 205(c)(2)(G) of the Social Security Act (42 

11 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)(G)) is amended— 

12 (1) by striking ‘‘The Commissioner’’ and insert13 ing ‘‘For individuals who are issued a social security 

14 account number before October 1, 2023, the Com15 missioner’’; and 

16 (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘The 

17 Commissioner of Social Security may not issue a re18 placement for the social security card of any indi19 vidual on or after October 1, 2028.’’ 

20 SEC. 4. REPORT ON FEDERAL USE OF SOCIAL SECURITY 

21 ACCOUNT NUMBERS. 

22 Not later than January 15, 2021, the Comptroller 

23 General of the United States shall submit a report to Con24 gress on all uses of the social security account number 

25 by each Federal agency, which includes the citation of any 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7143 IH

1 associated requirement (including statutory, regulatory, 

2 and other requirements). The Comptroller General shall 

3 submit to Congress a biennial update of such report not 

4 later than January 15 of the 1st session of each Congress. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.3

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANTTOSECTION 906**

**OFTHESARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Highwoods Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel L. Clemmens, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ DANIELL.CLEMMENS                                          |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Daniel L. ClemmensVice President and Chief Accounting Officer |   |
| May 9, 2008                                         |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000920941
<NAME> RED ROOF INNS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          10,915
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,356
<ALLOWANCES>                                       522
<INVENTORY>                                      9,958
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,845
<PP&E>                                         874,381
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 913,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,776
<BONDS>                                        519,916
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           285
<OTHER-SE>                                     325,726
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   913,561
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               164,950
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,057
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   140
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,125
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,974
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,151
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (746)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,405
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         (75,200)
<SECURITIES>                                 5,651,800
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,064,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (77,800)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,889,600
<PP&E>                                       3,518,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                (634,300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,773,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          808,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,776,300
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,188,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,965,200
<SALES>                                      1,992,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,095,900
<CGS>                                          895,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,687,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                408,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                   159,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   248,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Gary Wayne WOODS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-2407.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re Woods, Gary Wayne; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 300,156; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 10-01100.

Denied.
No. 13,448.

#### The Board of Commissioners of Posey County *v.*Templeton.

Township *Trustee.*— Compensation.—Overseer *of Poor.*— A township trustee, who has been paid two dollars per day for his services out of the township fund, is not entitled to an additional compensation, for the same time, as overseer of the poor.

From the Posey Circuit Court.

*E. M. Spencer, J. Kilroy*and *W. Loudon,*for appellant.

*A.*P. *Hovey*and *G. V. Menzies,*for appellee.

Elliott, J.

The appellee filed a claim for $600 for services rendered as overseer of the poor from the 19th day of April, 1884, until the 15th day of April, 1886.

The appellant answered that the appellee was the duly elected and qualified township trustee, that all of the alleged services were rendered by him in his official capacity of trustee, and that before the commencement of this action he was allowed and paid out of the township fund two dollars per day for each and every day for which in his complaint and itemized statement he claims compensation. This answer is good, and the trial court erred in sustaining the appellee’s demurrer.

The question here presented is settled by the decision in *Board, etc.,*v. *Bromley,*108 Ind. 158, where it was said: “We further interpret the section under consideration to mean that, as applicable to both classes of service, an allowance of only two dollars can be made for an actual day’s service, without reference to the manner in which the day may have been divided between the two classes of service, and that, consequently, a township trustee is not entitled to *370receive, out of any fund, more than two dollars for official services performed during any one day.”

Filed Dec. 20, 1888.

This ruling is in harmony with the spirit of our statutes and our decisions, for their spirit is that compensation for official services can be recovered only in cases where it is clearly given by positive law.

Judgment reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE RELATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE
THREE AND NINE MONTH PERIODS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,277
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,093
<PP&E>                                          71,870
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,918)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,268
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,321
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,619
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,288)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,268
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,953
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,098
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (50)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,974
<INCOME-TAX>                                       210
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,764
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,764
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

         Certification of Chief Executive Officer of FirstBank NW Corp.
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, that:

     o   The report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and


     o   The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the company's financial condition and results of
         operations.






/s/ CLYDE E. CONKLIN
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer


Dated: June 5, 2003
#### W. H. Nichols & Company, Inc. *v.*Day et al.

[No. 19,367.

Filed June 30, 1961.]

*157
      *Curtis C. Plopper,*of Boonville, for appellant.

*Robert J. Hayes, Carrol F. Dillon,*both of Evansville, and *Ford Gale Lacey,*of Boonville, for appellees.

Pfaff, C. J.

While appellees urge that appellant has presented no question here by reason of failure to comply, in certain respects, with Rule 2-17 of the Supreme Court in the preparation of its brief, we prefer, whenever possible, to decide appeals upon their merits. Appellant’s brief is such that we have no difficulty in ascertaining the questions presented.

Appellant has been hired as a contractor to construct the railroad yards and lines, including tracks and switches, at the Warrick Works of the Aluminum Company of America. The parties hereto entered into an oral agreement whereby appellees were to do the surveying work for the appellant which was necessary to determine the location of the tracks, their elevation, and the grades over which they were to be placed. Appellees were to do this work for $.144 per lineal foot of lines staked. Appellees thereafter staked 58,435.9 lineal feet, and their right to compensation at the agreed rate for this work is not questioned.

In the course of the work of laying ballast many of the stakes were covered and others were accidentally dislodged by workmen. The stakes were off-set from the line of the tracks in some places, but where there were a number of adjacent tracks to be laid the stakes were placed in the center line. Following the burying of stakes and the dislodging of some of them, appellees *158restaked a total of 15,598 feet. They had originally staked 58,435.9 feet, submitted a bid for 73,033.9 feet and were paid on the basis of 56,619.9 feet. Appellant does not think it should pay for this restaking and states that if the staking had been accomplished by the off-set method throughout, as it directed, instead of the center of the tracks, no restaking would have been necessary.

Appellees introduced evidence to the effect that at the time of entering into the agreement off-set staking was discussed, but it was decided that they were to use their own judgment; that during a part of the work there were several adjacent tracks being constructed and, because of their proximity, the off-set staking method could not be used; that appellant’s superintendent on the job thereupon instructed appellees to stake in the center of the proposed tracks.

The evidence is in conflict, and we must accept for the purpose of this appeal the evidence most favorable to the judgment of the trial court. Such evidence sustains the trial court’s decision, and we find no error in the assessment of the amount of recovery. The record discloses that the number of feet of staking done, at the agreed price, less payments made, exactly equals the amount of the judgment.

We find no error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Bierly, Gonas and Kelley, JJ., concur.

Note. — Reported in 175 N. E. 2d 893.
#### C. Murray et al. v. T. McCarty.

(No. 1602.)

February 9, 1884.

Error from Webb County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 107. *Account.*Appellee sued appellants upon a claim for work done in putting up some lattice work, and making several tables and platforms. He verified his claim by affidavit in accordance with article 2266 of the Revised Statutes, and recovered judgment upon it without adducing further evidence than the claim itself. *Held,*the claim sued upon is not an account within the meaning of article 2266, and the verification of it by affidavit did not dispense with proof of it. [McCamant v. Batsell, 59 Tex. 363; R. R. Co. v. Smith, *ante,*p. 44.] The judgment is without' competent evidence to support it.

Reversed and remanded.
#### W. O. Bohannon v. Pearson, Weston & Parker.

(No. 1813.)

Appeal from Harris *County.*

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 621. *Jurisdiction as to person as affected by change of venue; case stated.*Appellees brought this suit in the county court of Port Bend county against appellant and P. E. Bohannon, his former wife, jointly, upon a written contract for services rendered as attorneys at law. At the time the contract was made, W. 0. and P. E. Bohannon were husband and wife, but had been divorced when some of the services sued for were rendered. On the application of P. E. Bohannon alone, the venue of the suit was changed to Harris county. In the county court of Harris county, appellees dismissed their suit against P. E., and took judgment against W. 0., Bohannon, who appealed to this court, and the judgment was reversed and cause remanded for a new trial. He then pleaded to the jurisdiction of the Harris county court over his person, he being a resident of Port Bend county, which plea was overruled. *Held:*When P. E. Bohannon made application for a change of venue, W. 0. Bohannon made no objection thereto, nor was his privilege to be sued in the county of his residence claimed by him until this suit had been pending.in the county court of Harris county about three years. The change of venue to Harris county was properly ordered, and the effect of it was to cause the jurisdiction of the county court of Harris county to attach to the cause, both as to the person of the defendant and the subject-matter involved, notwithstanding the defendant W. 0. Bohannon did not join in the application for such change. And, even if the dismissal of the suit as to P. E. Bohannon had the effect to take away the jurisdiction of the county court of Harris county over the person of W. 0. Bohannon, the cause stood as if originally brought in that court, *547and lie would be held to a prompt and timely assertion of such privilege. [Lewis v. Davidson, 51 Tex. 251.]

March 7, 1885.

§ 622. *Husband not liable for services rendered at instance of tuife, when.*Two of the items of services sued for were rendered after W. O. and F. E. Bohannon had been divorced, and were rendered at the instance of F. E. Bohannon, acting upon her own responsibility and without authority from W. 0. Bohannon, but were rendered for the benefit of the community estate. The petition alleged that the services were rendered at the instance and request of the defendant. The suit as to F. E. Bohannon having been dismissed, this allegation applies to W. 0. Bohannon alone, and hence, to entitle plaintiffs to recover against him, the proof must have shown that he employed the plaintiffs himself, or authorized some one else to do so for him. This was not shown as to-two of the items, amounting in the aggregate to $27.70. It was not alleged by plaintiffs that said two items were for the benefit of the community estate, or that W. 0. Bohannon knowingly ratified their services, or shared in. the benefits resulting therefrom, as to said two items. As to said items the judgment is erroneous, and, because of this error, is reversed, and judgment here rendered for the proper amount.

Reversed and rendered.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
         YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
         TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                         11,595
<SECURITIES>                                                      794
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   7,524
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     (395)
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               20,163
<PP&E>                                                          5,138
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 (1,575)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 24,114
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           6,489
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       39,806
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (22,671)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   24,114
<SALES>                                                         4,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                6,027
<CGS>                                                             425
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   1,426
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                6,759
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (2,109)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (2,109)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (2,109)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (0.10)

        

</TABLE>