alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 18.1

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Suite 1200
201 East Kennedy Boulevard
Tampa, Florida 33602-5821

Ph: (813) 273-8300
Fax: (813) 229-7698
www.us.deloitte.com

                                                                       [GRAPHIC]
                                                                        Deloitte
                                                                        & Touche

March 6, 2003

Gevity HR, Inc.
600 301 Boulevard West
Suite 202
Bradenton, Florida 34205

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Gevity HR, Inc. as of
December 31, 2002 and 2001, and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2002, included in your Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities
and Exchange Commission and have issued our report thereon dated March 6, 2003,
which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
concerning the accounting change from gross revenue reporting to net revenue
reporting for worksite employee salaries, wages, and payroll related taxes. Note
1 to such consolidated financial statements contains a description of your
adoption of the change to net revenue reporting for worksite employee salaries,
wages, and payroll related taxes during the year ended December 31, 2002. In our
judgment, such change is to an alternative accounting principle that is
preferable under the circumstances.

Yours truly,

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte
Touche
Tohmatsu
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6746

ERNEST WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

LAURIE BESSINGER, Warden; CHARLES M. CONDON,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-95-1688-3-18BC)

Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* For the purposes of this appeal we assume that the date

Appellant wrote on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it

would have been submitted to prison authorities. See Houston v.

Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing

notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods

are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of

Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have

thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of

appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The

only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court

extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on April 2, 1996; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on May 3, 1996. Appellant's

failure to file a timely notice of appeal* or to obtain either an

extension or a reopening of the appeal period leaves this court

without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal.

We therefore deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
583 A.2d 309

#### ALBERT W. MAC NEILL v. JOHN J. RAFFERTY.

January 23, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Manuel YOUNGBLOOD v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-1693.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Youngblood, Manuel; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 248-956.

Denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7284
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RAOUL LAFOND, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-96-212) Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 24, 2004 Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raoul Lafond, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Raoul Lafond appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s denial of his motion to disclose grand jury transcripts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Lafond , No. CR-96-212 (M.D.N.C. July 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Diego MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 3D11-3021.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 8, 2012.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Daniel Tibbitt, Assistant Public Defender, for petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Timothy R.M. Thomas, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before SHEPHERD, SALTER and EMAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Diego Martinez filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, contending that his appellate counsel provided constitutionally ineffective assistance for failing to raise, on direct appeal, the trial court’s giving of an erroneous instruction. That instruction advised the jury that Martinez had the burden of proving the defense of self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt. Martinez asserts that this instruction was fundamentally erroneous and appellate counsel’s failure to raise this fundamental error on appeal entitles him to relief.

We need not determine whether the error was fundamental, because even if it was fundamental error, it was waived by trial counsel’s affirmative acceptance of the trial court’s erroneous instruction. *Falwell v. State,*88 So.3d 970 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (holding fundamental error was waived where the defense affirmatively agreed to an erroneous jury instruction which placed the burden on defendant to prove self-defense beyond a reasonable *1191doubt). *See also Richardson v. State,*818 So.2d 679, 680 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding “defense counsel may waive [a fundamentally erroneous jury instruction] by ‘affirmatively agreeing] to the omission or the alteration of a jury instruction!.]’ ”) (quoting *Philippe v. State,*795 So.2d 173, 174 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)). Rather than seeking habeas corpus relief with this Court, Martinez should have filed a motion for post-conviction relief with the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.1

We deny the petition without prejudice for Martinez to file, within sixty days, a legally sufficient motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850, limited to the issue raised in this petition. The Office of the Public Defender shall continue as counsel for Martinez for the postconviction proceedings below.

1

. This petition was filed less than two years after the judgment and sentence became final. Thus, had Martinez filed a motion for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel, it would have been timely filed. *See*Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SUPERGEN,
INC. MARCH 31, 1999 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,750
<SECURITIES>                                     1,253
<RECEIVABLES>                                      886
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                      1,149
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,994
<PP&E>                                           3,806
<DEPRECIATION>                                     959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,778
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,201
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,130
<SALES>                                            916
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   916
<CGS>                                              708
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,867)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,867)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,867)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1570 

To provide compensation for certain World War II veterans who survived 

the Bataan Death March and were held as prisoners of war by the Japanese. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2007 

Mr. MICA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide compensation for certain World War II veterans 

who survived the Bataan Death March and were held 

as prisoners of war by the Japanese. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Samuel B. Moody Ba5 taan Death March Compensation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PAYMENT TO WORLD WAR II VETERANS WHO SUR7 VIVED THE BATAAN DEATH MARCH. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the military de9 partment concerned shall pay, upon request, to an indiVerDate Aug 31 2005 06:52 Mar 21, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1570.IH H1570

ccoleman on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1570 IH

1 vidual described in subsection (b) the amount determined 

2 with respect to that individual under subsection (c). 

3 (b) COVERED INDIVIDUALS.—A payment under sub4 section (a) shall be made to any individual who as a mem5 ber of the Armed Forces during World War II— 

6 (1) was captured on the peninsula of Bataan or 

7 island of Corregidor in the territory of the Phil8 ippines by Japanese forces; and 

9 (2) participated in and survived the Bataan 

10 Death March. 

11 (c) AMOUNT TO BE PAID.—The amount of a pay12 ment under subsection (a) to an individual shall be $4 for 

13 each day during which the individual was held in captivity 

14 by Japanese forces during World War II, compounded an15 nually at a 3 percent annual rate of interest. 

16 (d) PAYMENT TO SURVIVORS.—In the case of an indi17 vidual described in subsection (b) who is deceased, pay18 ment under this section with respect to that individual 

19 shall be made to that individual’s nearest surviving rel20 ative, as determined by the Secretary concerned. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Brian GARNER.

No. 2012-K-0062.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Garner, Brian; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 2, No. 256,269; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No, 45,474-KA.

Not considered; not timely filed.
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Karen L.VanDerBosch, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of MakeMusic, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  August 3, 2007 By:  /s/ Karen L. VanDerBosch    Karen L.VanDerBosch    Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Pehong Chen, the Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer of BroadVision, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to thebest of his knowledge:**1.**The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, and to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and**2.**The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.IN WITNESSWHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 25th day ofSeptember 2006./s/ Pehong Chen
<PAGE>

                                THE CRONOS GROUP

EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Cronos Group (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Peter J. Younger, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (i)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,

      (ii)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.

      August 9, 2002



      /s/ PETER J. YOUNGER
      --------------------
      Peter J. Younger, Chief Financial Officer

                                                                              27
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         WHEREAS, the undersigned officers and directors of Vestcom
International, Inc. desire to authorize Joel Cartun, Brendan Keating and Michael
D. Helfand to act as their attorneys-in-fact and agents, for the purpose of
executing and filing the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001, including all amendments thereto,

         NOW, THEREFORE,

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Joel Cartun, Brendan Keating and Michael
D. Helfand, and each of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent,
with full power of substitution and re-substitution, to sign the registrant's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, including any
and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their
or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this power of
attorney in the following capacities on this 28th day of March, 2002.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signatures                                           Title
----------                                           -----

<S>                                                  <C>
/s/ Joel Cartun                                      Chairman and Director
------------------------------------------
Joel Cartun


/s/ Stephen R. Bova                                  Director
------------------------------------------
Stephen R. Bova


/s/ Leonard Fassler                                  Director
------------------------------------------
Leonard Fassler


/s/ Brendan Keating                                  President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating
------------------------------------------           Officer and Director
Brendan Keating


/s/ Robert J. Levenson                               Director
------------------------------------------
Robert J. Levenson


/s/ David Walke                                      Director
------------------------------------------
David Walke


/s/ Richard D. White                                 Director
------------------------------------------
Richard D. White


/s/ Michael D. Helfand                               Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
------------------------------------------           Officer and Treasurer (Principal and Financial
Michael D. Helfand                                   Accounting Officer)

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 59720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24143]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE


Methodology Committee of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 
Institute (PCORI)

AGENCY: Government Accountability Office (GAO).

ACTION: Notice on letters of nomination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act gave the 
Comptroller General of the United States responsibility for appointing 
not more than 15 members to a Methodology Committee of the Patient-
Centered Outcomes Research Institute. In addition, the Directors of the 
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Institutes 
of Health, or their designees, are members of the Methodology 
Committee. Methodology Committee members must meet the qualifications 
listed in Section 6301 of the Act. For these appointments, I am 
announcing the following: Letters of nomination and resumes should be 
submitted by October 29, 2010 to ensure adequate opportunity for review 
and consideration of nominees prior to appointment. If an individual 
has previously submitted a letter of nomination and resume to be 
considered for appointment to the PCORI Board of Governors and would 
also like to be considered for nomination to the PCORI Methodology 
Committee, please so indicate by e-mail or mail as noted below, however 
you do not need to submit another resume. Letters of nomination, 
nominee contact information and resumes can be forwarded to either the 
e-mail or mailing address listed below.

ADDRESSES: Nominations can be submitted by either of the following:
    E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#86d6c5c9d4cfcbe3f2eee9e2e9eae9e1ffc6e1e7e9a8e1e9f0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="db8b9894899296beafb3b4bfb4b7b4bca29bbcbab4f5bcb4ad">[email protected]</span></a> (in the subject line, please write 
``NOMINEE'S LAST NAME, Methodology Committee''). If submitted via e-
mail, please do not mail a hard copy.
    Mail: GAO Health Care, Attention: PCOR Institute Methodology 
Committee, 441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20548.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: GAO: Office of Public Affairs, (202) 
512-4800.
    [Sec. 6301, Pub. L. 111-1481].

Gene L. Dodaro,
Acting Comptroller General of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2010-24143 Filed 9-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE ex rel. Michael BIRKLETT v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-1691.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Birklett, Michael; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 4, No. 157,033; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,-705-KH.

Denied.