alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


EXTENSION AGREEMENT to be attached to and form a part of lease (which together
with any amendments, modifications and extensions thereof is hereinafter called
the Lease), made the 13th day of December 1993

           Between Spieker Properties, L.P., a California limited partnership,
           as Landlord
                        
                        and

           Infoseek Corporation, a California corporation,
           as Tenant

           covering the premises known as 2620 Augustine Drive, Suite 250,
           Santa Clara, California

Witnesseth that the Lease is hereby renewed and extended for a further term of
seventeen (17) months to commence on the first day of April 1997, and to end on
the thirty first day of August 1998, on condition that Landlord and Tenant
comply with all the provisions of the covenants and agreements contained in the
Lease, except:

1)      PARAGRAPH #4 - RENT   Rental for the premises shall be:


        $4,196.00 (Four Thousand One Hundred Ninety Six Dollars and no/100ths)
        per month plus basic operating costs and taxes per paragraph 29 of this
        Lease Agreement. Basic operating costs and taxes are estimated a year in
        advance and collected on a monthly basis. Any adjustment necessary (up
        or down) will be made at the end of the operating year.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed and sealed this Extension
Agreement.

Landlord: Spieker Properties, L.P., a California limited partnership
By: Spieker Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation
Its: General Partner


By: /s/ John A. Foster                      Dated:      9/17/96
   -------------------------                       ----------------
        John A. Foster (CW)

Title: Senior Vice President
       ---------------------

Tenant: Infoseek Corporation, a
        California corporation


By: /s/ Andrew E. Newton                   Dated:       9/11/96
   -------------------------                       -----------------        
        Andrew E. Newton

Title:    Vice President
       ---------------------
#### Leonard Anthony JACKSON, Marian Ann Gable Jackson, and Rudolph Jackson v. Donald P. YOUNG, Jr.; City of Baton Rouge, Baton Rouge City Police Department; Charlene Fontenot; Rebekah Fontenot; Nanette Greer, Principal of Baton Rouge Magnet High School; and East Baton Rouge Parish School Board through Charlotte Placide, Superintendent.

No. 2011-C-1888.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Jackson, Leonard Anthony et al.; Jackson, Marian Ann Gable; Jackson, Rudolph; — Plaintiffs); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 541,479; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1832.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert WILLIAMS.

No. 2010-KO-2083.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Williams, Robert; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. K, No. 08-1883; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-KA-51.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, B. James Rubin, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tripos, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

	a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	c)	disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 6, 2004

 

     /s/ B. James Rubin
     B. James Rubin
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 30, 2020

a0622

Order 

Clerk

June 30, 2020

156653(28)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156653

COA: 337218

Kent CC: 05-000708-FH

GERALD ALAN SHORT,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 4, 

2020 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
#### STATE ex rel. Hilton WRIGHT v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2009-KH-2506.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 17, 2010.

In re Wright, Hilton; —Plaintiff; Applying for Reconsideration of this Courts action dated November 5, 2010; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. G, No. 268-605; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2009-K-1389.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1468 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1468

   To ensure that, for each small business participating in the 8(a) 
business development program that was affected by Hurricane Katrina of 
 2005, the period in which it can participate is extended by 18 months.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2007

Mr. Jefferson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To ensure that, for each small business participating in the 8(a) 
business development program that was affected by Hurricane Katrina of 
 2005, the period in which it can participate is extended by 18 months.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disadvantaged Business Disaster 
Eligibility Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AVAILABILITY OF DISASTER LOANS FOR VICTIMS OF 
              HURRICANE KATRINA.

    (a) Retroactivity.--If a small business concern, while 
participating in any program or activity under the authority of 
paragraph (10) of section 7(j) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
636(j)), was located in a parish described in subsection (b) and was 
affected by Hurricane Katrina of 2005, the period during which the 
small business concern is permitted continuing participation and 
eligibility in such program or activity shall be extended for an 
additional 18 months.
    (b) Parishes Covered.--Subsection (a) applies to any parish in the 
State of Louisiana that has been designated by the Administrator of the 
Small Business Administration as a disaster area by reason of Hurricane 
Katrina under disaster declaration 10176 or 10177.
    (c) Review and Compliance.--The Administrator of the Small Business 
Administration shall ensure that the case of every small business 
concern participating before the date of the enactment of this Act in a 
program or activity covered by subsection (a) is reviewed and brought 
into compliance with this section.
                                 <all>
```
#### Elizabeth NIESEN a/k/a Elizabeth Urbec, Appellant, v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, Appellee.

No. 4D10-4572.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 29, 2011.

Joann M. Hennessey of Law Offices of Joann M. Hennessey, P.L., Miami, for appellant.

Jeffrey M. Gano of Florida Default Law Group, P.L., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*Affirmed. See Freemon v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Ams.,*46 So.3d 1202, 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

HAZOURI, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.
Order entered September 30, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00773-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.R. AND J.V., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-11-02361-R

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Tanner Joy Feast’s September 25, 2014 request for 

additional time to file the record and request to strike the incomplete reporter’s record previously 

filed by deputy reporter Kendra Thibodeaux. We GRANT the motion and STRIKE the 

reporter’s record filed August 26, 2014 by Kendra Thibodeaux. We ORDER Tanner Joy Feast 

to file the complete record no later than October 27, 2014. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Department of the United States Air Force LogoBiography
                  United States Air ForceDouglas Fraser CAPSTONE
            DOUGLAS FRASERGeneral Douglas M. Fraser, USAF, Ret., is a senior fellow with the National Defense University in support of the Pinnacle, Capstone and Keystone programs. He also is a global security consultant with several U.S. defense companies. In addition, he participates in security policy discussions with retired Chinese defense officials through a Yale University sponsored U.S.-China Track II Dialogue forum. His last assignment in the Air Force was as the Commander, U.S. Southern Command, Miami, Florida, responsible for U.S. military operations in Central and South America and the Caribbean. In this capacity, General Fraser was lead Department of Defense relief efforts following the 2010 Haiti earthquake.



Prior to commanding U.S. Southern Command, he served as the Deputy Commander, U.S. Pacific Command from 2008-2009. General Fraser commanded operational flying units across the U.S. Air Force at the squadron, group and wing levels. As a general officer, in addition to USSOUTHCOM, he commanded the U.S. Air Force Space Warfare Center and four different organizations in Alaska -- Alaskan Command, the Alaskan North American Defense Region, Joint Task Force Alaska and Eleventh Air Force. General Fraser’s staff assignments include two tours in the Pentagon, first in the Headquarters U.S. Air Force and then for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy, Resources and Requirements and for the Air Force Chief of Staff. He also served as the Executive Assistant to the Commander, U.S. Pacific Command in Hawaii. General Fraser holds a Bachelors Degree in political science from the U.S. Air Force Academy and a Masters Degree in political science from Auburn University. Prior to joining the Air Force, he lived in Bogota, Colombia, graduating from high school at Colegio Nueva Granada in 1971. He is also a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Weapons School, Squadron Officer School, Air Command and Staff College and the National War College. He is a command pilot with more than 3,300 flying hours, primarily in all variants of the F-15 and the F-16.



General Fraser’s business affiliations include consultant  to The Boeing Company’s Phantom Works, and he is an Advisory Board member of SAAB Defense and Security; Iridium Communications; Northrup Grumman Electronic Systems; Beechcraft Defense Company; and Baptist Health of South Florida.



General Fraser is a trustee of the Air Force Academy Falcon Foundation, a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors, and honorary member of the Orange Bowl Committee and a life member of both the Air Force Association and the National War College Alumni Association.



Retired from the Air Force in 2013,General Douglas M. Fraser’s active duty biographyis available on the Air Force website.Department of the Air Force Logo
#### Sandy BELLANGER, individually and on behalf of her minor child, Tsunami S. Dodge v. Craig WEBRE, Sheriff of Lafourche Parish, the Lafourche Parish Sheriff’s Office, Deputy Ben Dempster, Deputy Jeff Prevost and Deputy Jude Cantrelle.

No. 2011-C-1171.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Bellanger, Sandy; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Lafourche, 17th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 108,211; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 0720.

Denied.
#### Richard L. GILL v. Gabrielle A. BENNETT & Laurie Bridges.

No. 2012-CJ-0416.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Bridges, Laurie; — Defendant; Applying for Reconsideration of this court’s action dated March 7, 2012, Parish of Vernon, 30th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 80,972-A; to the Court of Appeal Third Circuit, No. 11-886.

Not considered. See Supreme Court Rule IX, § 6.
WILLIAM JO SE PH MANN , Appellant,

v. STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2704

_____________________________/ Opinion filed November 13, 2015. An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Nassau County

. Robert M. Foster , Judge

. William Jo se ph Mann, pro se , Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jillian H. Red ing, Assistant Attorney General and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. William Joseph Mann appeals the summary denial of his motion seeking postconviction relief brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure2 3.80 0 (a)

. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. The appellant originally filed a postco nviction motion pursuant to Florida
R ule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 seeking additional jail credit, which was summarily denied on the merits. On appeal, this Court reversed and remanded with
instructions for the trial court to either attach records refuti ng the appellant’s claim

or enter an order providing the appellant with leave to amend his facially insufficient
motion

. See Mann v. State , 160 So. 3d 554, 555 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). On remand,
the trial court provided the appellant with an opportunity to am end. Instead of filing an amended motion seeking jail credit, the appellant filed the instant rule 3.800(a) motion, seeking credit for time previously spent in prison on the incarcerative term of his original probationary split sentence pursuant to Dortly
v. State , 107 So. 3d 1229, 1230 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) . The lower court summarily denied the motion, indicating that the appellant was awarded one day of jail credit and failed to object to this credit at sentencing. In support of its order, the court attached the sentencing transcripts. However, in response to this Court’s Toler 1 order, the state properly concedes that these attachments do not refute the appellant’s
claim. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’ s order and remand for further

1 Toler v. State , 493 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)

.3 proceedings

. If the trial court again summarily denies the motion, the court shall
attach record exce r pts which conclusively refute the appellant’s entitlement to prison
credit.
REVERSED AND REMANDED

.

WOLF, WETHERELL and MARSTILLER, J.J., CONCUR.
News United States Air Force
 F-15Es arrive at Inclirlik Air BasePublished Nov. 13, 2015
                        
                        
                        U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa
                **RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany (AFNS) --**
                Six F-15E Strike Eagles arrived at Incirlik Air Base, Turkey, Nov. 12 in a demonstration of the United States' unwavering support to peace and stability in the region.
The U.S. Air Forces Europe-Air Forces Africa F-15Es were deployed as part of Operation Inherent Resolve in coordination with the Turkish government and to reinforce our shared commitment to the fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant in Iraq and Syria.
The F-15Es, from the 48th Fighter Wing at Royal Air Force Lakenheath, England, will join U.S., Turkish and other coalition aircraft in supporting OIR and counter-ISIL missions.Inclirlik Air Base 



Operation Inherent Resolve 



OIR 



turkey 



AFCENT 



USAFE 



RAF Lakenheath 



England 



F-15E Strike Eagle Related Links
        F-15E Strike Eagle
                                April 15, 2005
                                The F-15E Strike Eagle is a dual-role fighter designed to perform air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. An array of avionics and electronics systems gives the F-15E the capability to fight at low altitude, day or night and in all weather.
#### STATE ex rel. Francis HOTARD v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1131.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2011.

In re Hotard, Francis; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 06-381; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-KH-123.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Raymond JACKSON.

No. 2011-KO-0798.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

In re Jackson, Raymond; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 701066; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KA 1415.

Denied.
Exhibit 10.3
  AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION AGREEMENT
 Amendment Development
Agreement Company BioMarin CF
 RECITALS
 BioMarin Pharmaceutical Securities Purchase
Agreement
 Amendment to the Securities Purchase Agreement
    Securities Purchase Agreement Exhibit 1.41
 Exhibit 1.41 Exhibit 1.41




---



##### 



LA JOLLA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY
    
    
    BIOMARIN CF LIMITEDBy:
    /s/ Deirdre Y. Gillespie
    
    
    By:
     /s/ G. Eric DavisName:
    Deirdre Y. Gillespie, M.D.
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    G. Eric DavisTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    Managing Director




---



##### 



Exhibit 1.41
 Securities Purchase Agreement
 [Filed as Exhibit 10.30 to BioMarins Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008]
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1105]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   REMEMBERING A HERO, HUMBLE SERVANT

                                 ______

                           HON. HAROLD ROGERS

                              of kentucky

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 23, 1995
  Mr. ROGERS. Mr. Speaker, the Army Corps of Engineers, our southern 
region and the nation lost a humble servant, war hero and good friend 
when Mitchell ``Stoney'' Merriman died last week from complications of 
an inoperable brain tumor.
  Originally from White County, Tennessee, Stoney wrote the book on 
public relations--literally. A published author, newsman and writer, 
Stoney had such a creative and innovative style that he wrote a how-to 
book for the Corps that is used nationwide today.
  Since 1987, he managed the Army Corps Nashville District's public 
information, media relations and community relations program in a 7-
State area. I cannot think of anyone who knew how to promote an event 
better.
  In Corps events and groundbreakings in my district, Stoney always 
amazed us with something new, creative and exciting. His style blazed a 
trail for all to follow and his legacy will be long remembered.
  Stoney was more than just a top-notch public relations man. He was a 
veteran newsman, and even more importantly, a war hero.
  During his 23 years of service in the U.S. Marine Corps, he served 
two combat tours in Vietnam, where he served as a combat journalist. 
Among his awards were two Purple Hearts, Legion of Merit Medal, 
Meritorious Service Medal, the Bronze Star with Combat ``V'' Medal and 
several other awards.
  As a newsman, Stoney started in the military, but carried on his 
tradition of excellence at the ``The Smithville Review'' and then as 
publisher and editor of the ``Carthage, TN Courier.''
  I am proud of Stoney Merriman. He was committed, honest and hard 
working in everything he did--whether it was a Corps event placing his 
life in harm's way to protect and defend his country. He was a joy to 
be with, and his service must always be remembered.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF THE COMPANY PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


CERTIFICATION
 
 
 Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Pehong Chen, the Chief Executive Officer of BroadVision, Inc. (the "Company"), and Shin-Yuan Tzou, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
  2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 9thday of May, 2011.
  /s/  Pehong ChenPehong Chen

Chief Executive Officer
  /s/  Shin-Yuan TzouShin-Yuan Tzou

Chief Financial Officer
 This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of BroadVision, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.