alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 159 

To establish the American Veterans Congressional Internship Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. HOLT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration 

A BILL 

To establish the American Veterans Congressional Internship 

Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMERICAN VETERANS CONGRESSIONAL IN4 TERNSHIP PROGRAM. 

5 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is hereby established 

6 the American Veterans Congressional Internship Pro7 gram, under which each Member of the House of Rep8 resentatives may hire, for a period not to exceed 12 

9 months, one additional employee who meets the eligibility 

10 criteria described in subsection (b) to serve as the Amer11 ican Veteran Congressional Intern. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 159 IH

1 (b) CRITERIA FOR ELIGIBILITY.— 

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—An individual is eligible to 

3 serve as an American Veteran Congressional Intern 

4 for the office of a Member of the House of Rep5 resentatives if the individual meets such criteria as 

6 the Committee on House Administration may estab7 lish. 

8 (2) SPECIFIC INFORMATION AND ASSUR9 ANCES.—Under the criteria established under para10 graph (1), an individual shall not be eligible to serve 

11 as an Intern for the office of a Member of the House 

12 of Representatives unless the individual provides the 

13 following: 

14 (A) A certification that the individual 

15 served in the Armed Forces of the United 

16 States or in the reserve components of the 

17 armed forces. 

18 (B) A certification that the individual was 

19 honorably discharged from such service. 

20 (c) COMPENSATION.—A Member of the House of 

21 Representatives shall pay the American Veteran Congres22 sional Intern serving in the Member’s office a total salary 

23 of $25,000, to be paid to the Intern at a rate of $2,083.33 

24 per month out of applicable accounts of the House of Rep25 resentatives. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 159 IH

1 SEC. 2. NO EFFECT ON NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES OR MEM2 BER’S REPRESENTATIONAL ALLOWANCE. 

3 The employment of an American Veteran Congres4 sional Intern by a Member of the House of Representa5 tives, and the payment of a salary to such an Intern by 

6 a Member, shall be in addition to all personnel and allow7 ances otherwise made available to Members under other 

8 provisions of law, rule, or other authority. 

9 SEC. 3. REGULATIONS. 

10 The Committee on House Administration shall pre11 scribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out 

12 this Act. 

13 SEC. 4. DEFINITION. 

14 In this Act, the term ‘‘Member of the House of Rep15 resentatives’’ includes a Delegate or Resident Commis16 sioner to Congress. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          41,585
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,420,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (324,493)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,693,986
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,069,325
<PP&E>                                       1,373,863
<DEPRECIATION>                               (110,856)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,255,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,344,161
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,851,687
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,974,485)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,255,847
<SALES>                                     12,304,423
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,304,423
<CGS>                                        9,419,802
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,419,802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,719
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             102,413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,631,442)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (15,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,619,242)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,619,242)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.69)
        



</TABLE>
1 

### STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

Gayla Adkins, Claimant Below, Petitioner

v.) No. 23-609 (JCN: 2020009859)

(ICA No. 23-ICA-197)

Brightspring Healthcare Services, Employer Below, Respondent



### MEMORANDUM DECISION

Petitioner Gayla Adkins appeals the September 5, 2023, memorandum decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals (“ICA”). See Adkins v. Brightspring Healthcare Servs. , No. 23- ICA-197, 2023 WL 5695520 (W. Va. Ct. App. Sep. 5, 2023) (memorandum decision). Respondent Brightspring Healthcare Services filed a timely response. 1 The issue on appeal is whether the ICA erred in affirming the Board of Review’s order, which affirmed the claim administrator’s order granting Ms. Adkins a 7% permanent partial disability award.

On appeal, the petitioner argues that the ICA’s decision is clearly wrong in light of the substantial evidence in the record as a whole, and should be reversed because the preponderance of the evidence establishes that she sustained more than 7% whole person impairment as a result of her compensable injury. The respondent counters by arguing that the petitioner points to no erroneous procedure, no arbitrary or capricious conclusions, no abuse of discretion or jurisdictional error by the lower tribunals. Rather, she simply disagrees with the ICA’s decision, which does not constitute reversible error under the applicable standard of review.

This Court reviews questions of law de novo, while we accord deference to the Board of Review’s findings of fact unless the findings are clearly wrong. Syl. Pt. 3, Duff v. Kanawha Cnty.

Comm’n , No. 23-43, 2024 WL 1715166 (W. Va. April 22, 2024). Upon consideration of the record and briefs, we find no reversible error and therefore summarily affirm. See W. Va. R. App. P. 21(c).

Affirmed.

ISSUED: 

### August 27, 2024

1 The petitioner is represented by counsel Reginald D. Henry and Lori J. Withrow, and the respondent is represented by counsel Steven K. Wellman and James W. Heslep. 

### FILED August 27, 2024

C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

OF WEST VIRGINIA2

CONCURRED IN BY:

Chief Justice Tim Armstead

Justice Elizabeth D. Walker

Justice John A. Hutchison

Justice William R. Wooton Justice C. Haley Bunn
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6195

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner - Appellee,

v.

STEPHEN G. DEES,

Respondent - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (5:09-hc-02100-BR)

Submitted: October 28, 2010 Decided: December 9, 2010

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Jane E. Pearce, 

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Diana Pereira, Research and 

Writing Specialist, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. 

George E. B. Holding, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. 

May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, David T. Huband, 

Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen G. Dees appeals the district court’s order 

committing him to the custody of the Attorney General under 18 

U.S.C. § 4246 (2006). Dees asserts that the district court 

erred in concluding that he posed a substantial risk of danger 

to others as a result of his mental disorder. Finding no error, 

we affirm.

After a hearing, the district court found by clear and

convincing evidence that Dees “is presently suffering from a 

mental disease or defect as a result of which his release would 

create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or 

serious damage to property of another.” 18 U.S.C. § 4246(d). 

Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the district 

court did not clearly err in finding that Dees met this 

standard. United States v. LeClair, 338 F.3d 882, 885 (8th Cir. 

2003) (stating standard of review); see United States v. 

Robinson, 404 F.3d 850, 856 (4th Cir. 2005) (reviewing for clear 

error court’s decision regarding defendant’s competency to stand 

trial and citing United States v. Cox, 964 F.2d 1431, 1433 (4th 

Cir. 1992)); see also United States v. Harvey, 532 F.3d 326, 

336-37 (4th Cir. 2008) (stating that a finding is clearly 

erroneous “when, although there is evidence to support it, the 

reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite 
3

and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed”) 

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 

Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district 

court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.19 February 28, 2005 Total Entertainment Restaurant Corp.
9300 E. Central, Ste. 100
Wichita, KS 67206  Re:
    Bookkeeping Services Agreement/March 1, 1999 to February 28, 2002
And extension March 1, 2005 to February 28, 2006 Gentlemen: The parties to the Bookkeeping Services Agreement referenced above mutually agree to extend the
term of the agreement for one year at the expiration of the current term on February 28, 2005,
under the same terms and conditions. The extended term shall commence on March 1, 2005 and extend
through February 28, 2006. TENT Management, Inc. By:
    
    /s/ James K. ZielkeJames K. Zielke, SecretaryFranchise Services Company, LLCBy:
    
    /s/ Dale HoyerDale Hoyer, President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                            8947
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  154,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               163,331
<PP&E>                                       2,799,628
<DEPRECIATION>                                 110,749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,688,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,968
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,843,242
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,688,879
<SALES>                                        259,824
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               266,781
<CGS>                                           64,405
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             60,561
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    60,561
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Three months ended
                                                June 30,
                                         -----------------------
                                            2000         1999
                                         ----------   ----------
<S>                                   <C>          <C>
Net income as reported . . . . . . . . . $  431,000   $1,016,000
                                         ==========   ==========

BASIC:
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding. . . . .  5,070,167    4,800,405
                                         ==========   ==========

  Basic net income per share . . . . . .      $0.09        $0.21
                                         ==========   ==========


DILUTED:
  Common and common equivalent shares
  outstanding:
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding. . . . .  5,070,167    4,800,405
    Common stock equivalents from
      options computed on the
      treasury-stock method using
      the average fair market
      value of common stock
      outstanding during the
      period . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    221,630      219,530
                                         ----------   ----------
    Shares used in the
      computation. . . . . . . . . . . .  5,291,797    5,019,935
                                         ==========   ==========

  Diluted net income per share . . . . .      $0.08        $0.20
                                         ==========   ==========

</TABLE>

All number of shares data has been retroactively restated to reflect a 3-for-2
stock split distributed September 23, 1999.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Targeted Genetics Corporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Poston, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                                                    
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 16, 2009 |  | /s/ DAVID J. POSTON                                                
|                         |  | David J. Poston Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 190 (Friday, October 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 60830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24612]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Surrender of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small 
Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to 
function as a small business investment company under the Small 
business Investment Company License No. 06/76-0316 issued to SBIC 
Partners II, L.P., on June 16, 1998 and said license is hereby declared 
null and void as of July 28, 2010.

United States Small Business Administration.
Sean J. Greene,
AA/Investment.
[FR Doc. 2010-24612 Filed 9-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

The following Applications for:

                    Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (                    *See*14 CFR 301.201*et. seq.*). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.                

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2010-0235.                

*Date Filed:*                     September 17, 2010.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     October 8, 2010.                

*Description:*                     Application of Star Marianas Air, Inc. requesting authority to operate scheduled passenger service as a commuter air carrier.                

Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2010-24547 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2


I, PETER J. RICE, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MRO Software, Inc., a
Massachusetts Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:    August 14, 2003

By: /s/ Peter J. Rice
---------------------------------
Peter J. Rice
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)