alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
070316-F-JZ504-128.JPG
            GENERAL MUIR S. FAIRCHILDGeneral Muir Stephen Fairchild was former vice chief of staff of the U.S. Air Force. He was born in 1894 at Bellingham, Wash., and died March 17, 1950 at Fort Myer, Va. 

Muir Fairchild entered the service as a sergeant in the Washington National Guard in June 1916. A year later he became a flying cadet at Berkeley, Calif., and went to Europe to complete his training in France and Italy, getting his wings and commission in the Aviation Section in January 1918. He flew bombers in World War I, including night missions over the Rhine with the French forces. 

In December 1918 he returned home and served at McCook Field, Ohio; Mitchel Field, N.Y., and Langley Field, Va., chiefly in engineering assignments. Between Dec. 21, 1926 and May 2, 1927 he flew to South America in the Pan American good-will tour and received the Distinguished Flying Cross. He completed the course in the Air Corps Engineer School at Wright Field in June 1929 and went to Santa Monica, Calif., as Air Corps representative to Douglas Aircraft Co. He was promoted to captain in January 1931. 

In the 1930s he was graduated from the Air Corps Tactical School, the Army Industrial College, and the Army War College. He was promoted to major in June 1936 and returned to Maxwell Field, Ala. as an instructor. He rose to director of air tactics and strategy in July 1939, with promotion to lieutenant colonel in November 1940. Fairchild then went to the Plans Division in Washington and in June 1941 was named secretary of the newly formed Air Staff. Two months later he was advanced two grades to brigadier general and named assistant chief of Air Corps. 

In March 1942 he became director of military requirements and was promoted to major general in August. In November he became a member of the Joint Strategic Survey Committee of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. In January 1946 he was named commandant of Air University at Maxwell Field, with promotion to lieutenant general. On May 27, 1948 he became vice chief of staff of the U.S. Air Force, with the rank of four-star general. General Fairchild died at Fort Myer, Va., March 17, 1950 while on active duty as vice chief of staff.
#### Noretta THOMAS and Demetrice Butler, each Individually, and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated v. A. WILBERT & SONS, INC., L.L.C. and XYZ Insurance Company. Troy Robichaux, Shannon Robichaux, Michael J. Tuminello, Sr., and Olive D. Tuminello v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Health and Hospitals and through the Department of Environmental Quality, and Dow Chemical Company.

No. 2011-CC-0265.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2011.

In re Dow Chemical Company; Dupree, Ivy; —Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Iberville, 18th Judicial District Court Divs. B, A, Nos. 55,127, 56,803; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 2308.

Denied. Adequate remedy on appeal.

VICTORY and GUIDRY, JJ., would grant.
Department of the United States Air Force LogoBiography
                  United States Air ForceRobert Allardice (Capstone)
            ROBERT ALLARDICELt. Gen. Robert R. Allardice, USAF, Ret., is a senior fellow in support of the National Defense University's Capstone Program. The Course objective is to make newly selected general and flag officers more effective in planning and employing U.S. forces in joint and combined operations. The Capstone curriculum examines major issues affecting national security decision making, military strategy, joint/combined doctrine, interoperability and key allied national issues.

General Allardice is employed as a Highly Qualified Expert - Senior Mentor for the Joint Staff J7 in support of Combatant Command and Joint Task Force Operations and Exercises and  as a Senior Fellow in support of the National Defense University’s Pinnacle, Capstone, and Keystone programs.

General Allardice entered the Air Force in 1980 as a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy, earning a Bachelor of Science degree in civil engineering. His career included command at 18th Air Force, the largest numbered air force, joint, wing, group and squadron levels. Additionally, he served in a wide variety of high level operational and staff assignments at the Pentagon, Air Force Material Command, and Central Command. He deployed three times in support of operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. In 2001, he commanded the strategic humanitarian airdrop which began on the first night of combat operations in Afghanistan, the largest mass personnel airdrop since Operation Overlord, commonly referred to as D-Day. In the opening days of Operation Iraqi Freedom, he commanded and led the airdrop of the 173rd Airborne Brigade, seizing vital territory in northern Iraq. In 2007, he deployed to Iraq as Commander, Coalition Air Force Transition Team. There, he was responsible for the Multi-National Security Transition Command-Iraq for standing up the Iraqi air force.  The general was the Commander, 18th Air Force, Scott AFB, Ill. His final assignment was as Vice Commander, Air Mobility Command, Scott Air Force Base, Ill. General Allardice retired in 2013.

General Allardice founded AllardiceTM Enterprises, Inc., in 2013 after serving in the United States Air Force for over 33 years. With 16 Years senior executive experience and a remarkable record of achievement in the United State Air Force, General Allardice is recognized as an innovative pioneer leading transformation in modern complex global systems.

General Allardice is also a member, Air Force Studies Board of the National Academies’ National Research Council, “Opportunities for the Employment of Simulation in U.S. Air Force Training Environments”

Retired from the Air Force in 2013,Lt. Gen. Robert R. Allardice’s active duty biographyis available on the Air Force website.Department of the Air Force Logo
#### J. B. Lewis et al. v. John P. Richardson.

(No. 2665.)

November 9, 1887.

Appeal from Hopkins County.

Harris & Milam, counsel for appellants.

Leach & Templeton, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 343. *Appeal bond from justice’s court; description of judgment in, held sufficient; case stated.*Suit in justice’s court by appellee against appellant Lewis, and the sureties upon his bond as constable, to recover damages for the seizure and sale of,.property, etc. Judgment was recovered by appellee against appellants for $100 and costs, but the judgment did not specify that it was rendered against Lewis *as principal*and against the other appellants as his sureties. Appellants appealed to the county court, and in their appeal bond described the judgment correctly as to style and number of the suit, date and amount, etc., but stated that said judgment was rendered against said Lewis as principal and against the other defendants as his sureties. Upon motion of appellee the appeal was dismissed upon the ground that the appeal bond misdescribed the judgment. *Held*error. The record shows that Lewis was principal and that the other appellants were his sureties, and the recital of these facts in the bond was not calculated to mislead, nor was it such a misdescription of the judgment as rendered it at all doubtful what judgment was appealed from.

Reversed*and remanded.
Exhibit 8.1
 List of Significant Subsidiaries of United Microelectronics Corporation
 Jurisdiction of
    
    Percentage of Ownership as ofCompany
    
    Incorporation
    
    December 31, 2008UMC Group (USA)
    
    California, USA
    
    
    100.00%United Microelectronics (Europe) B.V.
    
    The Netherlands
    
    
    100.00
    %UMC Capital Corp.
    
    Cayman Islands
    
    
    100.00%United Microelectronics Corp. (Samoa)
    
    Samoa
    
    
    100.00%TLC Capital Co., Ltd
    
    Taiwan, ROC
    
    
    100.00%UMCi Ltd.
    
    Singapore
    
    
    100.00%Fortune Venture Capital Corp.
    
    Taiwan, ROC
    
    
    99.99%United Microdisplay Optronics Corp.
    
    Taiwan, ROC
    
    
    89.99%UMC Japan
    
    Japan
    
    
    52.64%Unitruth Investment Corp.
    
    Taiwan, ROC
    
    
    99.99%UMC Capital (USA)
    
    California, USA
    
    
    100.00%ECP VITA Ltd.
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    
    100.00%Soaring Capital Corp.
    
    Samoa
    
    
    100.00%Unitruth advisor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    China
    
    
    100.00%
#### Billie A. PRITCHETT v. DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION and Jane Doe.

No. 2011-C-1165.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Pritchett, Billie A.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 94714; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1466.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robyn Little DAVIS and Carol Noland Saltzman.

No. 2012-KK-0834.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 18, 2012.

In re Davis, Robyn Little; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 34876-09; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW 12-00236.

Denied.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB of OmniComm Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, being, Cornelis F. Wit, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Cornelis F. Wit
------------------------------------------------
Cornelis F. Wit
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

April 15, 2003
#### Kevin DEMING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D11-126.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Feb. 25, 2011.

Mark S. Germain of Law Offices of Ger-main & Coulter, Melbourne, for Petitioner.

Pamela J. Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence in Case No. 2009-CF-047002-A, in the Circuit court in and for Brevard *684County, Florida, *see*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

PALMER, LAWSON and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel; Review F30s, R03.                    

*Date:*                         October 18, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mary Kelly, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch,                               ( print page 58410)                            National Inst of Dental & Craniofacial Research, NIH 6701 Democracy Blvd, room 672, MSC 4878, Bethesda, md 20892-4878, 301-594-4809,                         *mary_kelly@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 16, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-23949 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Robert BUHRMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D10-553.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 3, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 22, 2010.

Robert Buhrman, Jasper, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*Affirmed. See Ilkanic v. City of Fort Lauderdale,*705 So.2d 1371 (Fla.1998); *Cruz v. State,*742 So.2d 489 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

GROSS, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1442 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1442

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
   to eliminate automatic increases for inflation from CBO baseline 
 projections for discretionary appropriations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2007

Mr. Gohmert (for himself, Mr. Hensarling, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Culberson, Mr. 
    Rohrabacher, Mr. Akin, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, Mr. Franks of 
    Arizona, Mr. Barrett of South Carolina, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. 
Sessions, Mr. Souder, Mr. Terry, and Mr. Sensenbrenner) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
   to eliminate automatic increases for inflation from CBO baseline 
 projections for discretionary appropriations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Zero Baseline Budget Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. CHANGES IN THE BASELINE.

    Section 257(c) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
Act of 1985 is amended--
            (1) in the second sentence of paragraph (1), by striking 
        everything that follows ``current year,'' and inserting 
        ``excluding resources designated as an emergency requirement 
        and any resources provided in supplemental appropriation 
        laws.'';
            (2) by striking paragraphs (2), (3), (4), and (5);
            (3) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (2); and
            (4) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(3) No adjustment for inflation.--No adjustment shall be 
        made for inflation or for any other factor.''.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION.

    The second sentence of section 275(b) of the Balanced Budget and 
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended by inserting ``other 
than subsections (a) through (d) of section 257'' after ``title''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.2

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated March
27, 2006 on the consolidated balance sheet of Widepoint Corporation as of December 31,
2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders
equity and cash flows for the year then ended which report appears in Widepoint
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report in the previously
filed registration statement of Widepoint Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-55993 and
333-124867) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-121858).

/s/ Epstein, Weber &
Conover P.L.C.

Scottsdale, ArizonaMarch 12, 2007
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 09a0463n.06

No. 08-1260

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

TERRANCE LOMBARD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UAW INTERNATIONAL UNION, Local 174,

Defendant-Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Before: BOGGS, Chief Judge; BATCHELDER and COOK, Circuit Judges.

COOK, Circuit Judge. Terrance Lombard appeals the decision of the district court to enter

summary judgment for the UAW International Union and its Local 174 chapter. Lombard sued the

defendants-appellees for breaching their duty of fair representation in a grievance against his

employer, Chrome Craft Corporation. After reviewing the record, the applicable law, and the

parties’ briefs, we find that the district court carefully and correctly set forth the facts and the

governing law. This court’s issuance of a full opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose and

would be duplicative, and so we affirm the grant of summary judgment, adopting the reasoning of

the district court’s opinion of February 7, 2008.
Exhibit
      32.1





**Certification
      of Periodic Financial Report**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of RC2 Corporation
      (the "Company") certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company
      for
      the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that
      Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.











Dated:
      February 28,
      2006 /s/
      Curtis W.
      Stoelting


Curtis
      W.
      Stoelting


Chief
      Executive Officer











Dated:
      February 28,
      2006  /s/
      Jody L.
      Taylor


Jody
      L.
      Taylor


Chief
      Financial Officer








This
      certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to
      the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
## NUMBER 13

- 24

- 00 125

- C R

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

NATALIE AGUILAR

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee.

O N APPEAL FROM THE 28 TH DISTRICT COURT

OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appears there is no final

appealable order. On February 16, 2024, appellant filed a notice of appeal attempting to

appeal a conviction in trial court cause number 17FC

- 1495A. In response to a late brief

not ice, appellant filed a response informing that the trial court granted a new trial on April2 3, 2024, and included a copy of the trial court’s order with the response. Therefore, the

Court is now without jurisdiction, as there is no final judgment of conviction before it.

Generally, a state appellate court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a

criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. Workman v.

State , 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961); McKown v. State

, 915 S.W.2d 160,

161 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). Exceptions to the general rule include:

(1) certain appeals while on deferred adjudication community supervision, Kirk v. State

,

942 S.W.2d 624, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); (2) appeals from the denial of a motion to

reduce bond, T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 31.1 ; McKown , 915 S.W.2d at 161; and (3) certain appeals

from the denial of habeas corpus relief, Wright v. State , 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.

—

Dallas 1998, no pet.); McKown , 915 S.W.2d at 161.

Our review of the documents before the Court shows that appellant’s case is still

pending in the trial court. Moreover, the notice of appeal cannot be construed as

premature because it was filed before the trial court made a finding of guilt or received a

jury verdict. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 27.1(b). Therefore, this cause is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction.

NORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2 ( b ).

Delivered and filed on the

28th day of August, 202 4

.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                        [REDWOOD TRUST, INC. LETTERHEAD]

                                 April 30, 2005

The Bank of New York
101 Barclay Street, 8 West
New York, NY  10286
Attention:  Trustee Sequoia 2002-A Collateralized MBS Funding Bonds

            RE:   Sequoia Mortgage Funding Company 2002-A Collateralized MBS
                  Funding Bonds;
                  Indenture dated April 1, 2002, between Sequoia Mortgage
                  Funding Company 2002-A and The Bank of New York (the
                  "Indenture");
                  Annual Statement as to Compliance by the Issuer

Ladies and Gentlemen:

      Pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Indenture with respect to the
above-referenced offering and in compliance with the requirements of TIA Section
314(a)(4), the undersigned officer of Redwood Trust, Inc. (the "Manager"), as
manager under the Management Agreement dated April 1, 2002 between Manager and
Sequoia Mortgage Funding Company 2002-A, hereby certifies as to the following:

      1.    a review of the fulfillment by the Issuer of its obligations under
            the Indenture during the preceding fiscal year has been made under
            the direct supervision of the undersigned officer; and

      2.    to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on such
            review, the Issuer has fulfilled all of its material obligations
            under the Indenture throughout the applicable period, and there has
            been no known default in the fulfillment of the Issuer's material
            obligations throughout such period.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        SEQUOIA MORTGAGE FUNDING
                                        COMPANY 2002-A

                                        By: Redwood Trust, Inc., as Manager

                                        /s/ John Isbrandtsen
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: John Isbrandtsen
                                        Title: Vice President