alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 21.1
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant


                                                State or Jurisdiction of
Name of Subsidiary                              incorporation
------------------                              ------------------------

3013439 Nova Scotia Company                     Nova Scotia, Canada
504087 N.B. Inc.                                New Brunswick, Canada
COS Information, Inc.                           Quebec, Canada
Electronic Imaging Services, Inc.               Delaware
Lirpaco, Inc.                                   Canadian (Federal)
Vestcom Ontario                                 Ontario, Canada
Vestcom Connecticut, Inc.                       Connecticut
Vestcom Investments, Inc.                       New Jersey
Vestcom Internet Solutions Group, Inc.          New Jersey
Vestcom Massachusetts, Inc.                     Massachusetts
Vestcom Mid-Atlantic, Inc.                      Delaware
Vestcom New England, Inc.                       Rhode Island
Vestcom Northwest, Inc.                         Delaware
Vestcom Retail Solutions Group, Inc.            Missouri
Vestcom Rhode Island Corp.                      Rhode Island
Vestcom St. Louis, Inc.                         Delaware
Vestcom Wisconsin, Inc.                         Wisconsin
Exhibit 32A

Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                                                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of WidePoint
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 ( the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ STEVE L. KOMAR Steve L.
KomarChief Executive Officer

/s/ JAMES T. MCCUBBIN James T.
McCubbinChief Financial Officer

Date:  June 17, 2005
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Animas Corporation on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Animas
Corporation each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to their respective knowledge: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Animas Corporation. /s/ Katherine D. Crothall
Katherine D. Crothall
President and Chief Executive Officer
Animas Corporation
March 31, 2005 /s/ Richard Baron
Richard Baron
Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Animas Corporation
March 31, 2005
#### STATE ex rel. Ricky NICHOLAS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0551.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

In re Nicholas, Ricky; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Divs. H, B, Nos. 82-8, 82-321; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 08-WR-887.

Denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Sheanda Bryant, et al., Intervenors-appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. LAWRENCE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants.

No. 86-4047.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 14, 1987.

Suzanne Griggins, Mendenhall, Miss., for intervenors-appellants, cross-appellees.

Frank D. Allen, Jr., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Appellate Section, Civil Div., Washington, D.C., Kenneth Rutherford, Jackson, Miss., William Bradford Reynolds, Brian K. Landsberg, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Appellate Section, Civil Div., Washington, D.C., Dale F. Schwindaman, Jackson, Miss., Malcolm Rogers, Monticello, Miss., for defendantsappellees, cross-appellants.

Jeanne Pettanati, Educational Opportunities Litigation Section, U.S. Dept. Justice, Washington, D.C., for other interested par- • ties.

Before WISDOM, RUBIN, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

*

 Chief Judge Clark has recused himself pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED, and the Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED.

Before GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, *1064HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.*

HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge,

with whom GEE, GARWOOD, JOLLY, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting:

I dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc for the reasons stated in my dissent to the panel opinion.

We are reminded of just how old this case is, and just how fragile its holding, by the related circumstances that Chief Judge Clark, the most senior active member of the court, is recused because he was counsel in the case, with the result that rehearing en banc was denied despite affirmative votes by a majority of the active judges not recused. Our rules require affirmative vote of a majority of the active members of the court in service. A recused judge remains in active service. I mention the rule, not to quarrel with it but, to aid those members of the bar who might otherwise wonder if we can count.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra M. Peay, Contact Representative, or Renee Chapman, Contact Representative, Federal Trade Commission Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room H-303, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3100.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-24415 Filed 9-30-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITEM 8 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          20,419
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                       136
<INVENTORY>                                      3,348
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,710
<PP&E>                                           1,778
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,223
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,721
<SALES>                                         11,520
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,270
<CGS>                                            5,499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,822
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,926)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (457)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,469)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

         Exhibit 11 - Statement Re:  Computation of Earnings Per Share



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 
                                                                            1996                  1997 
                                                                           ------                ------
  <S>                                                                      <C>                   <C>
  Primary:

     Average Shares Outstanding                                             9,508                14,407

     Net Effect of dilutive stock options -
          based on treasury stock method
          using average market price                                          848                   718
                                                                           ------                ------

  Totals                                                                   10,356                15,125
                                                                           ======                ======
  Net Income                                                                2,734                 4,294
                                                                           ======                ======
  Earnings Per Share                                                          .26                   .28
                                                                           ======                ======
</TABLE>
Order entered December 13, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00213-CV

MICHAEL DWAIN WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

LUPE VALDEZ, SHERIFF, Appellee

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-09709

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 12, 2018 request for a paper copy of the 

supplemental clerk’s record filed November 27, 2018. We GRANT the motion and DIRECT

the Clerk of the Court send appellant a paper copy of the November 27th supplemental clerk’s 

record.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2301

ANNE MELCHOR BREMUS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

AMR CORPORATION; AMERICAN AIRLINES, INCORPORATED; AMERICAN 

EAGLE AIRLINES, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief

District Judge. (2:12-cv-00100-RBS-LRL)

Submitted: May 29, 2015 Decided: June 16, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John B. Mann, JOHN B. MANN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellant. Daniel E. Farrington, THE FARRINGTON LAW FIRM, LLC, 

Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Anne Melchor Bremus appeals the district court’s order 

granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) motion for judgment 

on the pleadings on Bremus’s discrimination and retaliation 

claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights of 

1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). Bremus 

has filed a motion for leave to file materials as an attachment 

to her opening brief, and Defendants have filed a motion for 

leave to file a supplemental appendix. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant the 

parties’ pending motions and affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Bremus v. AMR Corp., No. 2:12-cv-00100-RBSLRL (E.D. Va. Nov. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         129,157
<SECURITIES>                                   176,616
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,498
<INVENTORY>                                     62,920
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               518,826
<PP&E>                                         112,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 585,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,663
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       419,958
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   585,710
<SALES>                                        327,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               327,161
<CGS>                                          144,322
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144,322
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               159,208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,337
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,335
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,002
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,002
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
        

</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1505 

To designate the Federal building located at 131 East 4th Street in 

Davenport, Iowa, as the ‘‘James A. Leach Federal Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2007 

Mr. LOEBSACK (for himself and Mr. BRALEY of Iowa) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building located at 131 East 4th 

Street in Davenport, Iowa, as the ‘‘James A. Leach 

Federal Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The Federal building located at 131 East 4th Street 

5 in Davenport, Iowa, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘James A. Leach Federal Building’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1505 IH

1 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be 

2 a reference to the ‘‘James A. Leach Federal Building’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Sheila Jean ROBINSON, Appellant.

No. 00-1951.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 5, 2001.

Decided Jan. 10, 2001.

Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Sheila Jean Robinson appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following revocation of Robinson’s supervised release. Robinson contends the district court committed error in failing to give her advance notice of its intent to depart upward from the 5-to-l 1-month revocation imprisonment range recommended under Chapter 7 of the Guidelines, to a revocation sentence of 12 months imprisonment and 2 years supervised release. This argument is foreclosed by the holdings of this court. *See United States v. Shaw,*180 F.3d 920, 922 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (Chapter 7 Guidelines serve non-binding, advisory role; thus, revocation sentence which exceeds suggested range “is not an ‘upward departure’ because there is no binding guideline from which to depart”).

Accordingly, we affirm.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, February 10, 2010, 8 a.m. to February 10, 2010, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 11, 2010, 75 FR 1397-1399.                

The meeting has been changed to a video assisted meeting. The meeting time has been changed to 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. on February 10, 2010. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: January 28, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-2437 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.03



          Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
            pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Spectrum Organic Products,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Neil G.
Blomquist, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   the information contained in the Report presents fairly, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                             /s/  Neil G. Blomquist
                                             ----------------------------------
                                                  Neil G. Blomquist
                                                  Chief Executive Officer


March 22, 2004




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e), and 37 CFR 404.7 (a)(1)(i) and 37 CFR 404.7 (b)(1)(i), announcement is made of the intent to grant a field of use exclusive, revocable license for the field of vaccination of ungulates to U.S. Patent No. 7,235,644 issued on June 26, 2007, U.S. Patent No. 7,025,963 issued on April 11, 2006, and U.S. Patent No. 7,018,636 issued on March 28, 2006, and related foreign patents and patent applications deriving from PCT/US95/04446, with all patents and patent applications entitled “Vaccine Against Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections,” to the University of Maryland, Baltimore, with its principal place of business at 620 West Lexington Street, 4th floor, Baltimore, Maryland 21201-1508.

# ADDRESSES:

Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For licensing issues, Dr. Paul Mele, Office of Research and Technology Applications (ORTA), (301) 619-6664. For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808, both at telefax (301) 619-5034.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license can file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, within 15 days from the date of this publication. Written objections are to be filed with the Command Judge Advocate (                    *see***ADDRESSES**                    ).                

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-24592 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
#### Udell LEJEUNE, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana, DOTD.

No. 2010-C-1568.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2011.

In re LeJeune Jr., Udell; —-Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Office of Workers’ Compensation, District # 03, No. 06-08127; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-121.

Denied.