alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors
Bay Banks of Virginia, Inc.
Kilmarnock, Virginia

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bay Banks of
Virginia, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and changes in
shareholders' equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Bay Banks of
Virginia, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ EGGLESTON SMITH P.C.

EGGLESTON SMITH P.C.

January 29, 2002
Newport News, Virginia
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: March 12, 2009
    /s/ BEN M. BRIGHAMBen M. BrighamChief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board
**Exhibit 32.1**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of MakeMusic! Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB forthe quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, William R. Wolff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
May 2, 2005
/s/ William R. Wolff
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,333
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          14,614
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                14,614
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     33,453
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          33,453
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            33,453
<LOANS>                                        303,268
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (1,924)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 397,425
<DEPOSITS>                                     242,277
<SHORT-TERM>                                    60,190
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,042
<LONG-TERM>                                     37,811
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,079
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 397,425
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,154
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  863
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   433
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,450
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,471
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,859
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      246
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    132
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        60
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.05
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,702
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,702
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    895
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               (1,780)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              (1,924)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           (1,924)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-51184, 333-106532and 333-125895), pertaining to the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2000Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 2000 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock OptionPlan of Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; the Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 333-72492) pertaining to the 2001 Non-Officer Equity IncentivePlan of Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; the Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 333-107062) pertaining to the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan ofRigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-111782)pertaining to the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan of Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;and in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-74906, 333-87276,333-105431, 333-106942, 333-111777, 333-112746, 333-119785and 333-129650) and the related Prospectuses, respectively, of ourreports dated [March 3], 2006, with respect to the financial statements ofRigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of RigelPharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) forthe year ended December 31, 2005.
|  | /s/ Ernst &  Young LLP |
|--|---------------------------------|

 

Palo Alto, CaliforniaMarch 7, 2006

----
#### PUGET SOUND PULP & TIMBER CO., a corporation, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 16252.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

April 12, 1960.

Rehearing Denied May 23, 1960.

George H. Koster, LenArd Zipperian, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Harry Marselli, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before ORR, BARNES and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner filed claims for excess profits tax relief under Section 722 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. Excess Profits Taxes, § 722.

The respondent Commissioner contends that review of this case is precluded by Section 732(c) of the 1939 Code, 26 U. S.C.A. Excess Profits Taxes, § 732(c), reading as follows:

> “(c) *Finality of determination*If in the determination of the tax liability under this subchapter the determination of any question is necessary solely by reason of section 711(b) (1) (H), (I), (J), or (K), section 721, or section 722, the determination of such question shall not be reviewed or redetermined by any court or agency except the Tax Court.”

Petitioner replies that whenever con stitutional questions of due process are raised, the determination of that question does not rest “solely” upon the sections mentioned.

We have heretofore ruled on this question. We again find we have no jurisdiction, resting our decision on James F. Waters, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 9 Cir., 1947, 160 F.2d 596,1 where we said,

> “It is well settled that where statutes create special relief, credits, or the like, such concessions are matters of legislative grace * * * and that Congress may preclude judicial review of the determinations of an administrator in respect of them.”

160 F.2d at page 598. And in Helms Bakeries v. Commissioner of Internal *804Revenue, 9 Cir., 1959, 263 F.2d 642, overruling Helms Bakeries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 9 Cir., 1956, 236 F.2d 3, where we relied on similar conclusions reached in the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Tenth Circuits, and cited the cases.

The petition for review is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

1

. Certiorari denied 332 U.S. 767, 68 S.Ct. 77, 92 L.Ed. 353.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000920528
<NAME> JAVA CENTRALE, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,497,920
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,688,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                    81,080
<INVENTORY>                                    381,905
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,362,486
<PP&E>                                       5,626,783
<DEPRECIATION>                                 901,442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,181,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,598,250
<BONDS>                                      2,356,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    18,017,091
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,623,481)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,181,760
<SALES>                                      7,664,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,481,313
<CGS>                                        7,474,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,034,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (172,478)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             130,649
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,511,251)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,511,251)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,511,251)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Leonard L. FARVE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-0247.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re Farve, Leonard L.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. M, No. 94-4203; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 10-WR-193,10-KH-727.

Denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1043

TIMOTHY LIMBERGER; LISA LIMBERGER,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

MICHAEL T. CLEARY,

Defendant – Appellant,

and

MONIQUE D. ALMY,

Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District 

Judge. (1:13-cv-01047-WMN)

Submitted: October 31, 2014 Decided: November 10, 2014

Before DUNCAN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey M. Kotz, KOTZ LAW GROUP, Towson, Maryland, for 

Appellant. Stanford G. Gann, Jr., Mark Alderman, LEVIN & GANN, 

P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Michael T. Cleary appeals from the district court’s 

order upholding the bankruptcy court’s orders reopening the 

adversary proceeding to allow additional evidence and 

determining that two debts that Cleary owed to Timothy and Lisa 

Limberger were non-dischargeable in Cleary’s bankruptcy 

proceeding. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed on 

appeal, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Limberger v. 

Cleary, No. 1:13-cv-01047-WMN (D. Md. Dec. 18, 2013). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
857 A.2d 182

#### WAL-MART STORES, INC., v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (RIDER). Petition of Leroy Rider.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 22, 2004.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of July 2004, we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and CONSOLIDATE it with *Gardner v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Genesis Health Ventures),*14 EAP 2004.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 60493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24469]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Notice of Extension for the Comment Period

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of time extension.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Highway Administration wishes to announce a 45 day 
extension for the Comment period on the Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) for the I-5 North Coast Corridor (I-5NCC) Project. The 
present closing day for comments is October 2, 2010. This additional 
period would extend the comment period to November 22, 2010.
    This project is 27 miles in length through 6 lagoons and six cities 
within the Coastal Zone. This is a large complex document that 
incorporates extensive technical studies within this environmentally 
sensitive corridor.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cesar E. Perez, Senior Transportation Engineer, Federal Highway 
Administration, California Division, 650 Capitol Mall, Rm. 4-100, 
Sacramento, CA 95747, (916) 498-5065, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6526001604174b150017001f25010a114b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c784a2b4a6b5e9b7a2b5a2bd87a3a8b3e9a0a8b1">[email protected]</span></a>.
Shay Lynn Harrison, Chief, Environmental Analysis Branch C, 4050 Taylor 
St., San Diego, CA 92110, (619) 688-0190, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b6e5ded7cf98facfd8d898fed7c4c4dfc5d9d8f6d2d9c298d5d798d1d9c0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a1f2c9c0d88fedd8cfcf8fe9c0d3d3c8d2cecfe1c5ced58fc2c08fc6ced7">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Issued on: September 23, 2010.
Cindy Vigue,
Director, State Programs, Federal Highway Administration, Sacramento, 
California.
[FR Doc. 2010-24469 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE ex rel. Randy HARRINGTON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0604.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

In re Harrington, Randy; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedí*468al Writs, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. K, No. 97540; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 09-01124.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172; cf. La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D).
**EXHIBIT 23.01**

 

**RWD TECHNOLOGIES,INC.**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.333-36157, 333-50199, 333-60593, 333-89093, 333-42760, and 333-87192)pertaining to the Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Planof RWD Technologies, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2003, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements and schedule of RWD Technologies, Inc.included in the Annual Report (From 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 

 
|                 | /s/  Ernst & Young LLP |   |
|----------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                 |
| Baltimore,  Maryland |
| March 28,  2003      |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60458-60459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24621]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 11:37 a.m. on 
Monday, September 27, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
related to the Corporation's supervision, corporate and resolution 
activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, seconded by Director John E. Bowman 
(Acting Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), concurred in by 
Director John G. Walsh (Acting Comptroller of the Currency), Director 
Thomas J. Curry (Appointive), and Chairman Sheila C. Bair, that 
Corporation business required its consideration of the matters which 
were to be the subject of this meeting on

[[Page 60459]]

less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of 
the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require 
consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; 
and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by 
authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), 
(c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 
U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), 
and (c)(10)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550-17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: September 27, 2010.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24621 Filed 9-28-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the following Registration Statements pertaining to the employee stock option plans of United Microelectronics Corporation:



|1. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-102605) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan,
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-126889) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan and the 2004 Employee Stock Option Plan, and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-142809) pertaining to the 2004 Employee Stock Option Plan and 2005 Employee Stock Option Plan
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated April 26, 2013, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of United Microelectronics Corporation, included in its Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

/s/Ernst & Young

Ernst & Young

Taipei, Taiwan,

Republic of China

April 26, 2013
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Targeted Genetics Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Todd E. Simpson, Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.