alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Western Ohio Financial Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly
period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Richard K. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and                              
|   
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Richard K. Smith
Name: Richard K. Smith
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or another document authenticating, acknowledging or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its Staff upon request.

26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            8450
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           40518
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  1480
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      28709
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              88
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                90
<LOANS>                                         423756
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  517433
<DEPOSITS>                                      369812
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               3797
<LONG-TERM>                                      17000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                      125761
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  517433
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  32146
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 5268
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 37414
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               17003
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               17153
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            20261
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      460
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   9820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  12347
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       12347
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      7540
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.85
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.21
<LOANS-NON>                                       1210
<LOANS-PAST>                                       153
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   594
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   3553
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1796
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       80
<RECOVERIES>                                         3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2179
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              2179
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 186 (Monday, September 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 59261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24075]

[[Page 59261]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RM06-16-010; RM06-16-011]

Mandatory Reliability Standards for the Bulk Power System; 
Supplemental Notice of Technical Conference

September 17, 2010.
    On August 19, 2010 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
announced that a Technical Conference on Frequency Response in the 
Wholesale Electric Grid would be held on Thursday, September 23, from 
10 a.m. to 4 p.m. This staff-led conference will be held in the 
Commission Meeting Room at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. The conference will be 
open for the public to attend and advance registration is not required. 
Members of the Commission may attend the conference. A supplemental 
notice issued on September 14, 2010 contained the agenda for this 
conference.
    We hereby announce that a free webcast of the technical conference 
in this proceeding will be available. Anyone with Internet access 
interested in viewing this conference can do so by navigating to http://www.ferc.gov's Calendar of Events and locating the appropriate event 
in the Calendar. The Calendar of Events will contain a link to the 
applicable webcast option. The Capitol Connection provides technical 
support for the webcasts and offers the option of listening to the 
conferences via phone-bridge for a fee. If you have any questions, 
visit http://www.CapitolConnection.org or call (703) 993-3100.
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please 
send an e-mail to [email protected] or call toll free 1-866-208-
3372 (voice) or 202-208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202-208-2106 with 
the required accommodations.
    For more information about this conference, please contact: Sarah 
McKinley, Office of External Affairs, Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-
8368, [email protected].

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24075 Filed 9-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), James M. Gower, Chief Executive Officer of Rigel
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company"), and Ryan D. Maynard, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:



In
Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of March 2, 2010.

/s/ JAMES M. GOWER

/s/ RYAN D. MAYNARDJames M. Gower

Ryan D. MaynardChief Executive Officer

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


This
certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date
of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 10-KSB

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Cecil a.  Brooks  does  hereby  certify  that the Annual  Report of  Cornerstone
Ministries Investments, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003
(the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as  applicable,  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and the  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 28, 2004.

/s/ Cecil A. Brooks, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

John T.  Ottinger,  does hereby  certify that the Annual  Report of  Cornerstone
Ministries Investments, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003
(the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as  applicable,  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and the  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 28, 2004.

/s/  John T.  Ottinger,  Vice  President,  Chief  Operating  Officer  and  Chief
Financial Officer
Exhibit 32A

Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                                                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of WidePoint
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 ( the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ STEVE L. KOMAR Steve L.
KomarChief Executive Officer

/s/ JAMES T. MCCUBBIN James T.
McCubbinChief Financial Officer

Date:  January 19, 2006
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 153 

To provide that no more than 50 percent of funding made available under 

the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 for any fiscal 

year be provided for home heating purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide that no more than 50 percent of funding made 

available under the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance 

Act of 1981 for any fiscal year be provided for home 

heating purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘LIHEAP Equity Act 

5 of 2007’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 153 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

2 Section 2604(a)(1) of the Low-Income Home Energy 

3 Assistance Act of 1981 (42 U.S.C. 8623(a)(1)) is amend4 ed— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (A) by striking ‘‘subpara6 graph (B)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraphs (B) and 

7 (C)’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(C) Not more than 50 percent of amounts 

11 appropriated for carrying out this title for any 

12 fiscal year shall be provided for home heating 

13 purposes.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
#### J. G. Hendricks v. William Cameron.

(No. 3161.)

Appeal from Hill County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

*(Transferred from, Austin. J*

§351. *Written instrument cannot be impugned except by plea under*oath, when, *etc.; case stated.*Cameron sued Hendricks and one Etchison in justice’s court upon a note executed by Etchison alone, alleging that Hendricks was a partner of Etchison, and as such liable on the note. The cause of action is described in the citation as follows: “Eor the sum of $134.50, with interest, due upon a note signed by J. E. Etchison, dated June 16, 1881, and due on or before October 1, 1881. Plaintiff claims that J. Gr. Hendricks was a silent partner of the said J. F. Etchison, and is equally liable with said J. E. Etchison to pay said note and interest.” Hendricks pleaded general denial and payment. Etchison made no-defense. Judgment was rendered in favor of Cameron against both defendants for the amount of the note and interest, and for the further sum of $14.80 as expenses,, and for costs. There was a provision in the note, that,., if the same was not paid at maturity, and the holder ■ *306thereof should thereby incur expenses *and'*costs, *an*additional amount of ten per cent, on the amount due, as a collection fee, should be paid. Hendricks appealed to the county court, and in that court pleaded, in writing, and under oath, a denial of partnership with Efcchison, and also pleaded payment in full, setting forth in, his plea of payment two receipts in writing, which he alleged had *been*executed by authorized agents of Cameron. Upon a trial *de novo*in the county court, Cameron was permitted, over the objections of Hendricks, to introduce evidence to show that the receipts were uot executed by his authority. The verdict of the jury was as follows: “We, the jury, find in favor of the plaintiff for the note as sued on, against J. F. Etchison and J. G-. Hendricks.” Upon this verdict the court rendered judgment in favor of Cameron for the amount of the note, principal and interest; and also for ten per cent, on that amount, collection fee, and for all costs. *Held,*the court erred in admitting evidence, objected to by the defendant, impugning the receipts upon which his plea of payment was founded. Such evidence would only be admissible under a written pleading, -verified by affidavit, and there was no.such pleading in this case. [E. S. art. 1574, subd. 8.]

October 18, 1884.

§ 352. *Judgment not warranted by citation, evidence or verdict.*Neither the citation, the evidence or verdict of the jury warranted the judgment for the ten per cent, collection fee. It was not claimed in the citation; there was no proof that plaintiff had incurred any expense or costs by reason of a failure to pay the note at maturity, and the verdict of the jury only found for the plaintiff *for the note as sued on,*and the note as sued on, as described in the citation, was *for*principal and interest, and nothing more.

Reversed and remanded.
#### MASNEY AUTO TRANSPORT, INC., Appellant, v. SHIPPER’S TRANSPORT COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 5D10-1216.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 29, 2011.

Keith A. Graham, of Marchena and Graham, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Sharon C. Degnan, of Kubicki Draper, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Masney Auto Transport, Inc. [“Mas-ney”] obtained a judgment against Shipper’s Transport Company [“Shipper’s”] and now appeals the order denying Mas-ney’s motion for attorney’s fees and the order striking Masney’s claim for prejudgment interest. Masney correctly contends that the trial court erred by striking its claim for pre-judgment interest on the $155,399.00 of past, out-of-pocket, lost profits damages that the jury’s verdict liquidated. *See Bosem v. Musa Holdings, Inc.,*46 So.3d 42 (Fla.2010). The trial court’s order denying Masney’s motion for attorney’s fees incurred due to Shipper’s refusals to admit certain of Masney’s requests for admissions is affirmed without discussion.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: February 26, 2010
    /s/ EUGENE B. SHEPHERD, JR.Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr.Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
21**
 
 
 Subsidiaries
of RC2 Corporation
 
 
 The
subsidiaries of RC2 Corporation as of December 31, 2004 are as
follows:
 
 **Name**
    **Jurisdiction
      of Organization**Learning
      Curve International, Inc.
    DelawareRC2
      (H.K.) Limited
    Hong
      KongRC2
      South, Inc.
    North
      CarolinaRC2
      Brands, Inc.
    DelawareThe
      First Years Inc.
    MassachusettsThe
      First Years Inc.
    DelawareGreen's
      Racing Souvenirs, Inc.
    VirginiaDiecastExpress.com,
      Inc.
    DelawareRacing
      Champions Worldwide Limited
    United
      KingdomRacing
      Champions International Limited
    United
      KingdomBondco
      988 Limited
    United
      KingdomAcre
      689 Limited
    United
      KingdomLearning
      Curve Deutschland GmbH
    GermanyLearning
      Curve Canada Holdco, Inc.
    DelawareRC2
      Canada Corporation
    Nova
      Scotia, CanadaRC2
      Australia Pty. Ltd.
    AustraliaLCI
      (H.K.) Limited
    Hong
      KongRCE
      Holdings, LLC
    Delaware
 
 ______________________
 
 All
subsidiaries are wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by RC2
Corporation.
Exhibit 32.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of Amendment No. 1 on Form 10K/A to the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of South Jersey Gas Company (the "Company") for the
period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward J. Graham, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Edward J. Graham
-----------------------------------
Name:  Edward J. Graham
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
July 28, 2004
No. 87-6339.

#### Williams *v.*Zimmerman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution and Diagnostic and Clas*968sification Center at Graterford, Pennsylvania, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                            McLEODUSA INCORPORATED

                     COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
                 (AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                               Three Months Ended
                                                                                                   March 31,
                                                                                              --------------------
                                                                                                 2001      2000
                                                                                               -------    ------
<S>                                                                                           <C>         <C>
Computation of weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Common shares, Class A, outstanding at the beginning of the period..........................      606.6     472.8
Weighted average number of shares issued during the period..................................        3.8       6.4
                                                                                                -------    ------
Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares..................................      610.4     479.2
                                                                                                =======    ======
Net loss....................................................................................    $(186.8)   $(72.1)
                                                                                                =======    ======
Loss per common share.......................................................................    $ (0.31)   $(0.15)
                                                                                                =======    ======
</TABLE>
#### Philip M. BAPTISTE, et al. v. Langdon H. STONE, et al.

No. 2010-C-2819.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Baptiste, Phillip M.; Phillip M. Baptiste Ins. Agency Inc.; —Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. D, No. 2005-04658; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-C-0116.

Denied.

KNOLL, J., would grant.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 22, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D24-545

Lower Tribunal No. F89-4447A

Luis Fernandez,

Appellant, 

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2)

from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Anne Stuzin, Judge.

Luis Fernandez, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
627 A.2d 1124

#### IN THE MATTER OF THE 1992 COUNTY OF ESSEX JUDICIAL BUDGET.

December 11, 1992.

ORDER

The Court having, on May 12, 1992, granted a petition for review of the Recommended Disposition/Order of the Essex County Assignment Judge in respect of the Judiciary’s 1992 budget;

And the Court having remanded issues involving wages, salaries, and operating expenses to a previously-established budget impasse panel;

And the panel having filed its report and recommendations with the Court on August 5, 1992;

And the parties having submitted their comments on and exceptions to the report pursuant to *Rule*1:33 — 9(k);

And the Court having reviewed the entire record and the arguments of the parties;

And good cause appearing;

IT IS ORDERED that the report and recommendations of the impasse panel in respect of the following are hereby adopted, to be effective immediately:

1. personnel and salary requests (pp. 89-94 of the panel report);

2. funding of the FACTS computer system (pp. 94-95 of the panel report); and

*4113. funding of law libraries for newly-appointed judges in Essex County (p. 95 of the panel report).

Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, GARIBALDI, and STEIN join in this Order.

Justice O’HERN dissents from that portion of paragraph one of the Order that addresses the position of Clerk to the Grand Jury.