alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Globus
International Resources Corp(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2003 (the "Report"), the undersigned each hereby certifies that: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: March 7, 2004                   /s/ YURY GREENE
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Yury Greene
                                           Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 7, 2004                   /s/ HERMAN ROTH
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Herman Roth, Chief Financial
                                           Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company, and forwarded to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### TI PNEUMOTIVE, INC., a/k/a Thomas Industries v. ECOLOGICAL TANKS, INC.

No. 2011-CC-1159.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 2, 2011.

In re Gardner Denver Thomas, Inc.; TI Pneumotive d/b/a Thomas Industries, Inc.;—Plaintiff(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 04-1128; to the Court of Appeal, *1030Second Circuit, Nos. 46,502-CW, 46,507-CW.

Denied.

CLARK, J., recused.
#### Herman FRANKLIN v. DEPARTMENT OF POLICE.

No. 2011-C-1074.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 2011.

In re Franklin, Herman; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, City of New Orleans Civil Service Commission, No. 7681; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-1581.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Lloyd Joseph DUPUIS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1864.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Dupuis, Lloyd Joseph; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedí*1137al Writs, Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 87-K-0698-C; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 10-00441.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
Exhibit 23.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated April 14,
2005 on the consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity,
and cashflows of WidePoint Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004, included in
its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report in Form S-8 in the companys previously filed Registration Statement Nos.
333-55993 and 333-124867.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Chicago, IllinoisMarch 14, 2007
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 24-60045

Summary Calendar

____________

Paola Eunice Mejia-De Marquez; 

Edgardo Ezequiel Marquez-Mejia, 

Petitioners,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, 

Respondent.

______________________________

Petition for Review of an Order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals

Agency Nos. A215 587 810, 

A215 587 811

______________________________

Before Smith, Stewart, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Paola Mejia-De Marquez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions 

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing her appeal of an order of an Immigration Judge ordering her removed and 

denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 5, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 24-60045 Document: 47-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/05/2024
No. 24-60045

2

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 We review the denial of 

asylum, withholding, and CAT claims for substantial evidence. Zhang v. 

Gonzales, 432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005). Per that standard, we may not 

disturb the BIA’s decision unless the evidence “compels” a contrary conclusion. Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Mejia-De Marquez has not met the standard. She shows no error in 

the BIA’s rejection of her proposed particular social group (“PSG”) of “perceived witnesses in El Salvador,” because that group lacks distinction. See 

Gonzales-Veliz v. Barr, 938 F.3d 219, 229 (5th Cir. 2019); Hernandez-De La 

Cruz v. Lynch, 819 F.3d 784, 786–87 (5th Cir. 2016). PSG membership is an 

essential element of Mejia-De Marquez’s asylum and withholding claims. 

See Jaco v. Garland, 24 F.4th 395, 401, 406–07 (5th Cir. 2021); VazquezGuerra v. Garland, 7 F.4th 265, 269, 271 (5th Cir. 2021). Consequently, the 

lack of a cognizable PSG is fatal to her asylum and withholding claims, and 

we need not consider her remaining arguments concerning those forms of 

relief. See INS v. Bagamasbad, 429 U.S. 24, 25 (1976); Munoz-De Zelaya v. 

Garland, 80 F.4th 689, 693–94 (5th Cir. 2023). 

Mejia-De Marquez also challenges the denial of her CAT claim. That

challenge fails because she has not shown that she more likely than not will 

be tortured with governmental acquiescence if repatriated. See Morales v. 

Sessions, 860 F.3d 812, 818 (5th Cir. 2017). 

The petition for review is DENIED.

_____________________

1 The other petitioner is Mejia-De Marquez’s minor child and is a derivative 

beneficiary on her asylum application. 

Case: 24-60045 Document: 47-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/05/2024
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lisa ROBINSON.

No. 2011-KO-0381.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Robinson, Lisa; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 3, No. 263,705; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,820-KA.

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6039-6040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2464]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel, Member Conflict: Neurodevices, Bioengineering and 
Biomodeling.
    Date: February 24, 2010.

[[Page 6040]]

    Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call.)
    Contact Person: Vilen A. Movsesyan, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4040M, MSC 7806, Bethesda, MD 
20892. 301-402-7278. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#81eceef7f2e4f2f8e0eff7c1e2f2f3afefe8e9afe6eef7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f7270696c7a6c667e71695f7c6c6d3171767731787069">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 28, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-2464 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### D. A. Cobb v. James W. Tufts.

(No. 2934.)

Error from Wise County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 152. *Sale; what does and what does not constitute.*To constitute a sale of property, the title to, or property in, the thing, must pass from the seller to the buyer. Every sale transfers the property, and that is not a sale which does not transfer the property in the thing sold. A transfer only of the *special*property, and not of the general or absolute title, is not a sale of the thing. [Woods v. Half, 44 Tex. 633; Benjamin on Sales, § 68; Hunt v. Wyman, 100 Mass. 198; Fuller v. Buswell, 34 Vermont, 107.]

§ 158. *Same; conditional and incomplete.*Where a sale is made and possession delivered to the vendee, upon the express condition that the title to the thing, is to remain in the vendor until the purchase price be paid, such payment is strictly a condition precedent, and, until performance thereof, the sale is incomplete and the right of property is not vested in the vendee. [Ridgeway v. *142Kennedy, 52 Mo. 24; Little v. Page, 44 id. 412; Parmlee v. Catherwood, 36 id. 479; Heath v. Randall, 4 Cush. 195; Hanway v. Wallace, 18 Ind. 377; Ballard v. Burgett, 40 N. Y. 314; Cogghill v. R. R. Co. 3 Gray, 545; Hotchkiss v. Hunt, 49 Me. 213; Benjamin on Sales, § 320, note (d).]

April 19, 1884.

§ 154. *Plea of failure of consideration held good.*T. sold C. a soda-fountain, taking C.’s notes for the purchase price. In the notes it was expressly stipulated that the title to said property remained in T., and did not vest in C., until the notes were paid. The property was delivered to 0., and without fault on his part was destroyed by fire. In a suit by T. upon the notes, 0. pleaded the destruction of the property as above stated, and it was held, on general exception to the plea, that it was a good plea of failure of consideration, and the judgment was reversed because the court sustained plaintiff’s general exception to it.

Reversed and remanded.
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 202 3

- 3370 LT Case No

. 2017

- CA

- 000321

____________________________ EGM M ARKETING , I NC ., d/b/ a Anchor ’ s Away C ruises and Tours, Appellant,

v.
M ANIPHONE P HOUANGEKO A LBRECHT , Appellee.

_____________________________

On a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County

. Jason J. Nimeth , Judge

. Elliott Goldberg, of DiGiacomo & Goldberg, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant. Joseph C. Shoemaker, of Bogin, Munns , & Munns, P.A., Leesburg, for Appellee. July 9, 2024
P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. E DWARDS , C.J., and L AMBERT and J AY , JJ., concur
.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROGELIO TOMAS-ALONZO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-74808

Agency No. A98-175-280

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 16, 2010** 

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Rogelio Tomas-Alonzo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and

withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

FILED

NOV 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-74808

review de novo questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th

Cir. 2008), except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s determination

of the governing statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535

(9th Cir. 2004). We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Zehatye v.

Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for

review.

Tomas-Alonzo does not raise any substantive challenge to the BIA’s

determination that his asylum application is time-barred. Accordingly, we deny

the petition for review as to Tomas-Alonzo’s asylum claim. See Martinez-Serrano

v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues that are not addressed in the

argument portion of a brief are deemed waived).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that TomasAlonzo did not demonstrate past persecution or a clear probability of future harm

on account of a protected ground. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481-84

(1992). Accordingly, Tomas-Alonzo’s withholding claim fails.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### Charles Mahle v. Robert Grierson et al.

(No. 3378.)

Appeal from Presidio County.

Opinion by

White, P. J..

§ 764. *Trespass; nominal damages for; de minimisnon curat lex; case stated.*This is a suit for damages, brought by appellant against appellees for trespass upon his uuinclosod land, destruction of the grass thereon,: and frightening his cattle by the discharge of fire-arms, etc. The evidence is that appellees were hunting wild ducks at a pond on appellant’s land. They drove to the pond in a buggy, crossing a portion of "appellant’s land twice in going to and returning’ from the pond. Appellant had advertised against trespassing on his land, and at the time in question he requested appellees to desist from trespassing on his land; but they remained and fired several shots after this request. No cattle were in sight when any shooting was done. The grass around the pond which was trampled by appellees was a coarse, briny, inferior grass, which cattle would not eat when they could get any other. There was a verdict for ap • pellees, and judgment in accordance therewith. *Heldr*It is contended by appellant that the judgment is wrong, because the evidence establishes at least appellant’s right to nominal damages. The general rule is that every trespass committed upon property is necessarily accompanied with some damage, however inconsiderable the injury, and hence the right to recover damage for a tres*671pass cannot be denied. [W. & W. Con. Rep. § 763; Champion v. Vincent, 20 Tex. 811.] But, says Mr. Meld: “ There are cases, however, of such trifling injury that no action at law can be maintained therefor. The law will afford no encouragement to useless and malicious litigation. It regards not mere trifles. *‘ De minimis non curat*lex’ is the maxim.” [Field on-Dam. 681, 682.] We are of the opinion that the evidence in this record brings this case within the above quoted maxim.

June 3, 1885.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1176]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

TRIBUTE TO MARIANNE TETA AND MARTIN GOLDEN, BAY RIDGE COMMUNITY COUNCIL 
                           AWARD DINNER DANCE

                                 ______

                          HON. SUSAN MOLINARI

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, June 7, 1995
  Ms. MOLINARI. Mr. Speaker and distinguished colleagues, please join 
me as I recognize the dedication, determination and efforts of two 
outstanding citizens of Bay Ridge, NY, Marianne Teta, president of the 
Bay Ridge Community Council and Martin Golden, president of the Fifth 
Avenue Board of Trade and the recipient of the 1995 Bay Ridge Community 
Council Civic Award.
  This dynamic team allied civic, business, church, and veterans groups 
in an ongoing public awareness campaign which resulted in the continued 
operation of Fort Hamilton Army Base, a historic landmark serving our 
country since 1825.
  Marianne J. Teta, lifelong resident of Brooklyn, presently serves as 
the director of NYNEX Consumer Affairs for Brooklyn and Staten Island. 
Among the many organizations Marianne is presently active in are the 
Bay Ridge Lions, Ragamuffin and the Bay Ridge Parks and Waterfront 
Council.
  Martin Golden resides in Bay Ridge with his lovely wife Colleen and 
their son Michael. Together they manage the Bay Ridge Manor and aid 
many worthly organizations such as the Angel Guardian Home and Heart 
Share.
  We are fortunate to be blessed with these caring individuals who have 
encouraged community pride and involvement by supporting our neighbors 
in the armed forces. They are a credit to Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, and an 
important part of the fiber that strengthens our neighborhoods and 
Nation.

                          ____________________
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23 - 0162 ROBERT L. ROSE,

Petitioner and Appellant, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRIAN GOOTKIN, Director; and JAMES SALMONSEN, Warden of Montana State Prison,

Respondents and Appellees.

**ORDER** Through counsel, Montana Department of Corrections, Brian Gootkin, and James Salmonsen have filed Notice that this appeal is not subject to ma ndatory appellate alternative dispute resolution under Mont. R. App. P. 7. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this appeal is NOT subject to ma ndatory appellate alternative dispute resolution under Mont. R. App. P. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Peter M. Meloy is relieved of his appointment as m ediator in this matter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 26 2023

05/26/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0162
#### STATE ex rel. Eugene DOUGLAS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-2148.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 17, 2010.

In re Douglas, Eugene; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 03-10-1000; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 1032.

Denied. Moot.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

October 5, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00454

- CV

Charlene MENDEZ

, Appellant

v.

Jeremy DELGADO

, Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 10408 Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file her brief is GRANTED. We ORDER appellant to file her brief on or before December 4, 2018. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 5th day of October, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
CC Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc. 403-717-3898


Exhibit 10.69




ADDENDUM 

SUBSEQUENT TO 

the

LETTER AGREEMENT

dated February 20, 2008, made by and between Hollund Industrial Robotics Inc and Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.







Reference is herein made to the TigerLynk Purchase & Sale Agreement dated January 20, 2008, and the Letter Agreement dated February 20, 2008 made by and between Hollund Industrial Robotics Inc, a Canadian corporation (“Buyer”), and AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORP, a Nevada corporation (“Seller”), collectively herein referred to as the “parties”.




This addendum is to document certain adjustments to the method of payment agreed to by the parties. 




The parties hereby agree to the following; 




(a)

Hollund will deposit 750,000 free trading shares of Hollund Industrial Inc., a Nevada registered company trading on the “PinkSheets” trading system, to the accounts of the Jim Lyons investment group. Hollund will make the deposit via Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC), within two days after delivery of the account numbers and appropriate DTCC transfer information. 

(b)

Aquatic will consider this deposit of shares as payment received for the March 1, 2008 payment due under the terms of the Purchas and Sale Agreement and Letter Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THIS ADDENDUM SHALL BE EFFECTIVE AS OF March 25, 2008.






















 \S\Lonnie Hayward               

_\S\Sheridan Westgarde___

Lonnie Hayward, President

Sheridan Westgarde, CEO







Endnotes

AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION




HOLLUND INDUSTRIAL ROBOTICS INC.









Hollund Addendum March 25, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being, Ronald T. Linares, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|/s/ Ronald T. Linares                                                                
|Ronald T. Linares Executive
Vice President and Chief Accounting and Financial Officer

October 5, 2010

A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.