alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
OWOSSO CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three Months Ended                  Six Months Ended
                                                    ----------------------------         -------------------------
                                                       May 2,          April 26,          May 2,          April 26,
                                                        1999             1998              1999             1998
<S>                                                  <C>             <C>                <C>             <C>
BASIC:

Net income available for common stockholders         $1,026,000       $1,670,000         $ 623,000       $1,411,000
                                                     ==========       ==========         =========       ==========
Weighted average number
          of common shares outstanding                5,826,000        5,814,000         5,821,000        5,811,000
                                                     ==========       ==========         =========       ==========
Basic earnings per common share                      $     0.18       $     0.29         $    0.11       $     0.24
                                                     ==========       ==========         =========       ==========

DILUTED:

Net income available for common stockholders         $1,026,000       $1,670,000         $ 623,000       $1,411,000
                                                     ==========       ==========         =========       ==========
Weighted average number
          of common shares outstanding                5,826,000        5,814,000         5,821,000        5,811,000

Dilutive effect of stock options                         15,000           24,000            24,000           24,000
                                                     ==========       ==========         =========       ==========

Weighted average number of shares outstanding         5,841,000        5,838,000         5,845,000        5,835,000
                                                     ==========       ==========         =========       ==========

Diluted earnings per common share                    $     0.18       $     0.29         $    0.11       $     0.24
                                                     ==========       ==========         =========       ==========
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Cancer Etiology Study Section, October 7, 2010, 8 a.m. to October 8, 2010, 5 p.m. Marina del Rey Marriott, 4100 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey, CA, 90292 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 31, 2010, 75 FR 53317-53319.                

The meeting will be held at the Marina del Rey Hotel, 13534 Bali Way, Marina del Rey, CA 90292. The meeting dates and time remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: September 20, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-24138 Filed 9-24-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 10.2

     THIS AMENDMENT  (this  "AMENDMENT") is made as of the 28th day of December,
2008 (the "Effective Date"), by and between Domark International,  Inc. a Nevada
Corporation,  NASDAQ  OTC  BB  or  assign  ("PURCHASER"),  and  Emerging  Growth
Advisors, LLC., a Florida corporation ("SELLER").  The Purchaser and Seller will
jointly be referred to as the "PARTIES."

     WHEREAS,  the Parties wish to amend that certain Asset Purchase  Agreement,
dated  November  6, 2008,  by and  between  the  Parties  (the  "ASSET  PURCHASE
AGREEMENT").

     THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the foregoing,  the mutual  covenants and
agreements  contained  herein,  and other good and valuable  consideration,  the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto and
their respective heirs, executors, administrators,  successors and assigns agree
as follows:

     Section  2.2 It is hereby  agree by the  Parties,  that the Asset  Purchase
Agreement be modified to include the following:

     The Seller has waived the  following  requirement:  "the  completion by the
Purchaser of a minimum  capital raise of $250,000 to close  simultaneously  with
the closing of this transaction "

     2. The Parties agree and  acknowledge  that all terms and conditions of the
Asset Purchase Agreement not modified herein remain in full force and effect.

     3. This  Amendment  may be  executed in one or more  counterparts,  each of
which shall be deemed an original but all of which together will  constitute one
and the same instrument.

Purchaser: Domark International, Inc.      Seller: Emerging Growth Advisors, LLC


/s/ R. Thomas Kidd                         /s/ Timothy Glynn,
-------------------------------------      -------------------------------------
Signature                                  Signature
R. Thomas Kidd, CEO                        Timothy Glynn, Managing Member
#### Derrick KNIGHT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D10-3354.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 23, 2011.

Rehearing Denied March 15, 2011.

*631Derrick Knight, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, CORTINAS, and LAGOA, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Hernandez v. State,*30 So.3d 610 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
#### STATE ex rel. Henry F. WEBER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0543.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

In re Weber, Henry F.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court’ Div. C, No. 416-357; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2009-K-1043.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J., would grant.
News United States Air Force
 TRICARE waives referral requirement for family members departing from TurkeyPublished April 4, 2016
                        
                        By TRICARE
                **FALLS CHURCH, Va. (AFNS)  --**
                The Defense Department ordered departure of about 700 family members of active-duty service members from southern Turkey, due to security concerns in the region. TRICARE is waiving the primary care manager (PCM) referral requirement for all evacuated beneficiaries. This will help them get medical care while away from their homes and doctors.
The evacuated families will relocate to various locations overseas and in the U.S. The waiver will last 180 days from March 30-Sept. 30. Normally, TRICARE Overseas Program (TOP) Prime and TOP Prime Remote beneficiaries need a referral from their PCM to get any specialty care.
While evacuated, beneficiaries can contact the military treatment facility closest to them to get primary care. If they stay overseas, but are not close to an MTF, they can contact International SOS, the TOP contractor, for help. If they are in the U.S. and not close to an MTF, they should contact the International SOS TOP Regional Call Center or the appropriate regional contractor.
If evacuated beneficiaries decide not to return to the region, they can change their TRICARE enrollment to their new permanent location by contacting the regional contractor for that area.TRICARE 



turkey 



departure 



AF family
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 1, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131376 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131376 

 COA: 258817 

Wayne CC: 04-005801-01

JIMMY MICHAEL LOFTIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 13, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1025 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 1, 2006 

 Clerk
#### STATE ex rel. Talama G. LEWIS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-1689.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Lewis, Talama G.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 03-3121; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KH-630.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Jackie WALLACE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1993.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Wallace, Jackie; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. E, Nos. 484-837, 484-805; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Nos. 2009-KA-1548 C/W, 2009-KA-1549.

Denied.
#### Mosler Safe & Lock Co. v. T. D. Campbell, Sheriff, etc.

(No. 1531.)

Appeal from Gregg County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 16. *Amendment of cause of action after appeal.*An amended petition filed in the county court, in a cause appealed from justice’s court, which does not set up a new cause of action, but merely amplifies and makes more explicit the original statement of the cause of action, does not come within the prohibition announced by this court in Curry v. Terrell [W. & W. Con. Rep. §§ 239, 240], and is allowable.

*24October 20, 1883.

§17. *Sale of personal properly; conditional; vendor not divested of title, when.*Appellant sold a safe to one D., a condition of the sale being that the title to the safe should remain in appellant until D. had fully paid the notes given by him for the purchase price thereof. Appellee, as sheriff, by virtue of an execution against D., levied upon and sold the safe, having actual notice at the time of said levy and sale that the title to the safe was in appellant. Appellant brought this suit to recover the value of the safe, alleging the above state of facts, and the court sustained a general demurrer to his petition and dismissed his suit. *Held,*error; the petition showed a good cause of action. Under the contract, as alleged, the title to the safe remained in appellant until D. had paid the purchase price, and it is alleged that the purchase price had not been paid. D. had no title .to the safe until he had paid for it. It is well settled that a sale of personal property, such as the one alleged by appellant, passes no title to the vendee until the purchase money has been paid. [Thompson v. Ray, 46 Ala. 224; Ridgeway v. Kennedy, 52 Mo. 24; Cole v. Mann, 3 Thompson & Cook (N. Y.), 380; Powell v. Preston, id. 644; Story on Sales, § 313.]

Reversed and remanded.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Thefollowing certification is furnished pursuant to the requirements of theSecurities and Exchange Commission and shall not be deemed “filed” for thepurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section.  Such certification shall not be deemed incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, except to the extent that such certification is specificallyincorporated by reference by the registrant.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Metro One Telecommunications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Timothy A. Timmins,Chief Executive Officer and Duane C. Fromhart, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|  Date: | August 9, 2004 | /s/  Timothy  A. Timmins |   |
|-------------|---------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|        |                | Timothy A. Timmins            |
|        |                | President, Chief Executive    |
|        |                | Officer                       |
|        |                |                          |
|        |                |                          |
|        |                | /s/   Duane C. Fromhart  |   |
|        |                | Duane C. Fromhart             |
|        |                | Senior Vice President,        |
|        |                | Chief Financial Officer       |

 

1

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Allen SNYDER.

No. 2011-KK-0464.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2011.

In re Snyder, Allen; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 95-5114; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-K-23.

Denied.

KNOLL, J., recused.
#### STATE ex rel. Ricky JOHNSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-2723.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Johnson, Ricky; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/ or Remedial Writs, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 803-632; to the *1191Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KA 0518.

Denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Robert W. Winston IIIName:
    
    Robert W. Winston, IIITitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    May 10, 2006
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

THOMAS JEFF RE Y ROBERTS , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 0

- 2317

[ December 30, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nine t eenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie Count y ; Charles A. Schwab

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562012CF000217A

.

Thomas Jeffr ey Roberts

, Bristol , pro se

.
No appearance required for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

W ARNER , G ROSS and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
| Name                                                              | Jurisdiction                of Organization |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |                                        |
| Learning                Curve International, Inc.                 | Delaware                                    |
| RC2                Limited                                        | Hong                Kong                    |
| Learning                Curve Brands, Inc.                        | Delaware                                    |
| Learningcurveshop.com,                Inc.                        | Delaware                                    |
| Racing                Champions Worldwide Limited                 | United                Kingdom               |
| Racing                Champions International Limited             | United                Kingdom               |
| Bondco                988 Limited                                 | United                Kingdom               |
| Acre                689 Limited                                   | United                Kingdom               |
| RC2                Deutschland GmbH                               | Germany                                     |
| Learning                Curve Canada Holdco, Inc.                 | Delaware                                    |
| RC2                Canada Corporation                             | Nova                Scotia, Canada          |
| RC2                Australia Pty. Ltd.                            | Australia                                   |
| RCE                Holdings, LLC                                  | Delaware                                    |
| RC2                (Asia) Limited                                 | Hong                Kong                    |
| Learning                Curve Canada Limited                      | Ontario,                Canada              |
| Learning                Curve Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.          | Mexico                                      |
| Learning                Curve Services Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. | Mexico                                      |

----
#### STATE of LOUISIANA v. Yilver Moradel PONCE.

No. 2011-KO-0833.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

In re Ponce, Yilver Moradel; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 444,364; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KA 1446.

Denied.
#### Nathaniel CARSWELL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-2107.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 6, 2010.

Nathaniel Carswell, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Carswell seeks a belated appeal of a December 2008 judgment and *100sentence of the circuit court. He alleged in his sworn petition and testified at an evidentiary hearing before a special master that after being sentenced and while still in the county jail awaiting transfer to DOC, he sent a timely letter to his trial counsel requesting an appeal, but one was not initiated. At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel testified that he did not receive any correspondence from petitioner requesting an appeal. The special master found counsel’s testimony in this regard to be credible, and thus concluded that counsel did not receive a letter requesting an appeal, nor did petitioner send such a letter.

While the special master’s finding that counsel did not receive a letter requesting an appeal is supported by competent substantial evidence, that finding is not dis-positive since if such a letter was properly mailed, counsel’s failure to receive and act on it would in itself warrant the granting of a belated appeal. *See Rumph v. State,*746 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); *see also Brock v. State,*947 So.2d 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). The special master’s amended report and recommendation fails to identify any evidence refuting petitioner’s sworn testimony that he timely mailed the letter, nor does it articulate a basis for disregarding that testimony. Accordingly, consistent with our decisions in *Rumph*and *Brock,*the petition seeking a belated appeal of the judgment and sentence rendered on or about December 17, 2008, in Clay County Circuit Court case number 2008-CF-000939, is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall be furnished to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as a notice of appeal. If petitioner qualifies for the appointment of counsel at public expense, the circuit court shall appoint counsel to represent him on appeal.

PETITION SEEKING BELATED APPEAL GRANTED.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM J. FAULKNER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 475 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of May, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          3,514
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  44,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                      718
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               51,269
<PP&E>                                         21,822
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 82,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          83,370
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                    15,939
<COMMON>                                          192
<OTHER-SE>                                    (29,475)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   82,116
<SALES>                                       448,075
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              448,075
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 425,459
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               16,959
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  230
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                647
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,956
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    4,956
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .21
        

</TABLE>