T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T BA LJ I T K A U R, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 70512 A ge nc yN o. A 098- 176- 995 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r d o f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J ul y17, 2012 ** B ef ore: S C H R O E D E R , T H O M A S , and S IL V E R M A N , C i rc ui tJudg es B a l j i tK aur , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of Im m ig ra ti o n A p p ea ls’ o rd erd ism issin g h erap p ea l fro m an im m ig ra ti o n ju d g e’s de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e r e vi e w f or 

# FI LED JU L 27 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 70512 2 s ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e the a ge nc y ’ s f a c tua l f i ndi ngs , appl y i ng the ne w s t a nda r ds g o v e rn in g a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n s c r e a te d b yth e R e a l I D A c t. Shr e s tha v. H older , 59 0 F . 3d 10 34 , 10 39 (9th C i r. 20 10 ). W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U. S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . We d e n y th e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e r e j e c tK aur ’ s c ha l l e nge t o the a ge nc y ’ s a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i on be c aus e the r e c or d doe s notc om pe l af i ndi ng of c r e di bi l i tygi ve n the m a ny d is c r e p a n c ie s b e tw e e n h e rte s tim o n ya n d s u p p o rtin g d o c u m e n ts . See i d. a t1048 (a dv er se cr edi bi l i ty f

i nd i ng re as on abl e und erthe t ot al i ty of the ci rc um st ance s) ; D on v. G on zales , 4 7 6 F . 3 d 7 3 8 , 7 4 1 -4 5 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 7 ) (u p h o l d i n g ad v erse cr edi bi l i ty f

i nd i ng w here “ a r ea sonabl e f ac t fi nd ercoul d h ave r ea ched thi s r es ul t ”) ; W a n gv . I NS , 3 5 2 F . 3 d 1 2 5 0 , 1 2 5 7 -5 8 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 3 ) (u p h o l d i n g ad v erse c r e di bi l i ty f

i ndi ng ba s e d i n pa rton i nc ons i s t e nc i e s be tw e e n t e s t i m oni a l a nd do cum ent ary e vi dence and concl ud i ng evi dence pres ent ed di d n otcom pel contrary re sul t ). A cc ordi ng l y, i n the abse nce of cr edi bl e t es t i m on y, w e deny the pet i t i on as to K au r ’s a s y lu m a n d w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im s . See Fa r a h v . A s h c r o ft , 348 F . 3d 11 53 , 11 56 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). F i na l l y , be c aus e K aur ’ s C A T c l a i m i s ba s e d on the s a m e s t a t e m e nt s the a ge nc y f ound notc r e di bl e , a nd s he doe s notpoi ntt o a nyothe re vi de nc e i n the r e c or d tha tc om pe l s the c onc l us i on tha ti ti s m or e l i ke l ythan nots he w oul d be10- 70512 3 t ortured by or w i th the ac qu i es ce nce of the go vernm enti f r eturned t o Ind i a, her C A T c la im f

a ils . See i d. a t1156- 57. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.