alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1488 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the exclusion for 

employer-provided educational assistance to include educational assistance 

provided to dependents of employees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2007 

Mr. KELLER of Florida (for himself, Mr. KIND, and Mr. WELLER of Illinois) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

the exclusion for employer-provided educational assistance to include educational assistance provided to dependents of employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Friendly Em5 ployers Act of 2007’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1488 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER-PROVIDED EDU2 CATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDED TO DE3 PENDENTS OF EMPLOYEES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 127(c) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining edu6 cational assistance) is amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘or a dependent of the em8 ployee’’ after ‘‘education of the employee’’ in sub9 paragraph (A), and 

10 (2) by inserting ‘‘or dependent’’ after ‘‘em11 ployee’’ in subparagraph (B) and in the material fol12 lowing subparagraph (B). 

13 (b) SEPARATE LIMITATION FOR DEPENDENTS.— 

14 Subsection (a) of section 127 of such Code is amended 

15 by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

16 ‘‘(3) MAXIMUM EXCLUSION FOR ASSISTANCE

17 FURNISHED TO DEPENDENTS.—If, but for this para18 graph, this section would exclude from gross income 

19 more than $2,500 of educational assistance fur20 nished to the dependents of an employee (in the ag21 gregate) during a calendar year, this section shall 

22 apply only to the first $2,500 of such assistance so 

23 furnished.’’. 

24 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (2) of 

25 section 127(a) of such Code is amended— 


bajohnson on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1488 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘an individual’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘the employee’’, and 

3 (2) in the heading thereof by striking ‘‘MAX4 IMUM EXCLUSION’’ and inserting ‘‘MAXIMUM EXCLU5 SION FOR ASSISTANCE FURNISHED TO EMPLOYEE’’. 

6 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

8 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
#### STATE ex rel. David JACOBSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1147.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2011.

In re Jacobson, David; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Beauregard, 36th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 10-134; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 10-00350.

Denied.
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 4.27

                              STEPHEN J. SCHOEPFER




December 12, 2003


JAG Media Holdings, Inc.
6965 S.W. 18th Street, Suite B13
Boca Raton, FL  33433


Re:      Promissory Note dated April 1, 2002 in the principal amount of $200,000
         between JAG Media Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a JagNotes.com Inc.), as
         borrower, and Stephen J. Schoepfer, as lender, with a maturity date of
         December 17, 2003 ("Promissory Note")

Gentlemen:

This will serve to confirm that the "Maturity Date" of the Promissory Note is
hereby extended from December 17, 2003 to the earlier of (i) January 31, 2004 or
(ii) the effective date of a "Change in Control" as that term is defined in the
Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended.

Except for the foregoing changes, the Promissory Note remains unchanged and in
full force and effect.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Stephen J. Schoepfer

Stephen J. Schoepfer
Doc# 64R2995.DOCX No. 03

- 17

- 00705

- CV

__________________________________________________________________

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AUSTIN

__________________________________________________________________

IN RE UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. AND MATTHEW ZANER

Relators.

__________________________________________________________________

MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

__________________________________________________________________

James M. “Jamie” Parker, Jr.

State Bar No. 15 488710

Larry D. Warren

State B ar No. 20888450

Whitney Broadwater

State Bar No. 24082733

NAMAN HOWELL, SMITH & LEE, PLLC

10001 Reunion Place, Ste. 600

San Antonio, TX 78216

Tel: 210

- 731

- 6364

Facsimile: 210

- 785

- 2964

Email: jparker@namanhowell.com

COUNSEL FOR RELATORS ACCEPTED

03-17-00705-CV

21331200

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

12/15/2017 3:56 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKDoc# 64R2995.DOCX COMES NOW RELATORS, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC AND

MATTHEW ZANER, and file this Motion to Dismiss and would show unto the

Court as follows:

I.

On December 15, 2017

, the trial court signed its order on the motion for

reconsideration/ clarification previously filed by Relators. Between the signing of

the order and the Rule 11 agreement between the parties relating to the scope of

discovery, the issues raised as a part of the mandamus petition have become moot.

Relators therefore reque st that the Court dismiss this mandamus petition.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Relators request that the Court

dismiss the petition for mandamus, and for such other relief to which Relators may

be entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ James M. Parker, Jr.

James M. “Jamie” Parker, Jr.

State Bar No. 15488710

Whitney Broadwater

State Bar No. 24082733

NAMAN HOWELL SMITH & LEE PLLC

10001 Reunion Place

, Suite 600

San Antonio, Texas 78216

Telephone: (210) 731

- 6350

Facsimile: (210) 785

- 2950

jparker@namanhowell.com

wbroadwater@namanhowell.com

ATTORNEYS FOR RELATORSDoc# 64R2995.DOCX CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has

been sent on the 15th day of December , 2017 to the following, as shown below:

S. A. Hayden Briggle Via E

- Service and Email

State Bar No. 24059487

Parker P. Polan

State Bar No. 24060432

BRIGGLE & POLAN, PLLC

812 San Antonio Street, Suite 310

Austin, Texas 78701

Phone: (512) 472

- 1926

Fax: (512) 472

- 1174

hayden@brigglepolan.com

parker@brigglepolan.com

Attorneys for Real Parties in Interest,

Robert Strickland and Lisa Strickland

The Honorable Eric Sheppard Via CMRRR

County Court at Law No. 2

Travis County Courthouse

100 Guadalupe, Room 211

Austin, Texas 78701

Telephone: (512) 854

- 9242

Facsimile: (512) 854

- 4724

Respondent

_ /s/ James M. Parker, Jr.

____ James M. “Jamie” Parker, Jr.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129261 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

WILLIE WRIGHT,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129261 

 COA: 252790 

Oakland CC: 2003-050906-NO 

MICRO ELECTRONICS, INC.,

 Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

TONY NUNEZ and FRANK ANGELUCCI, 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 30, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61246-61247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Darwin National 
Assurance Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 4 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2010 Revision, published July 1, 2010, at 75 FR 38192.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable 
surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the 
following company: Darwin National Assurance Company (NAIC <greek-i> 
16624). Business Address: 9 Farm Springs Road, Farmington, CT 06032. 
Phone: (860) 284-1300. Underwriting Limitation b/: $28,329,000. Surety 
Licenses c/: AL, AK, AZ, GO, DE, DC, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, 
KY, LA, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, ND, OH, 
OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WV, WI, WY. 
INCORPORATED IN: Delaware.
    Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference 
copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2010 Revision, to 
reflect this addition.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30th each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified

[[Page 61247]]

(see 31 CFR part 223). A list of qualified companies is published 
annually as of July 1st in the Circular, which outlines details as to 
the underwriting limitations, areas in which companies are licensed to 
transact surety business, and other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: September 20, 2010.
Laura Carrico,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division,
[FR Doc. 2010-24632 Filed 10-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
Order filed November 5, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00693-CV

____________

DEVONIA T. GEORGE SLATER, Appellant

V.

CHRISTOPHER LANE SLATER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 246th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-66462

ORDER

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter 

for the Court informed this court that appellant had not made arrangements for 

payment for the reporter’s record. On August 26, 2013, the clerk of this court 

notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that do not 

require a reporter’s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided this 

court with proof of payment for the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). Appellant 

filed no reply. 
Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal within thirty 

days of the date of this order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court 

will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph Michael ELIE, III.

No. 2011-KO-2786.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 2012.

In re Elie III, Joseph Michael; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 297,861; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Nos. 10-1494,10-1382.

Denied.
856 A.2d 32

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Paul Anthony GRAEFF, Jr., Respondent.

No. 895 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

June 24, 2004.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of June, 2004, there having been filed with this Court by Paul Anthony Graeff, Jr., his verified Statement of Resignation dated April 20, 2004, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Paul Anthony Graeff, Jr., be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania retroactive to February 3, 2004; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David M. Bronson, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify that the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ David M. Bronson David M. Bronson
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer

February 9, 2005
Exhibit 32.2  Certification of Principal Financial Officer  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc. (the Registrant), I, Frank Dalene, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Registrant.   Dated:  March 31, 2008 /s/ Frank Dalene Frank Dalene
#### I. & G. N. R. R. Co. et al. v. J. L. Watt.

(No. 3433.)

Appeal from Travis County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§781. *Special contract of affreightment; plea of, held to he erroneously stricken out; case stated.*Appellee sued appellants to recover damages for injuries received by two horses shipped by him on their lines of railroad from Memphis, Tenn., to Austin, Texas. The action was against appellants as common carriers to enforce their common law liability as such. Appellants pleaded specially, a special contract of affreightment entered into between them and appellee at the time and place of the shipment of the horses. Upon exceptions made to this plea by appellee, it was stricken out, and he recovéred judgment for $500 and costs. *Held:*The court erred in striking out the special plea. It set forth in full the alleged special contract, and also made said contract a part of said plea. Said contract contains reasonable and valid conditions limiting the common law liability of appellants as carriers, and as the contract was made without this state, and was not to be performed wholly within this state, these limitations were not inhibited by our statute. [R. S. art. 278; *ante,*§§ 191, 192, 193, 194; Hutch, on Carriers, §§ 239, 241, 243; R. R. Co. v. Henlein, 52 Ala. 607; Squire v. R. R. Co. 98 Mass. 239.]

§ 782. *Same; recovery must he had upon, if had at all; cannot he avoided upon the plea that party did not know its contents.*Appellee replied to the special plea, and ad*687mitted the making of the contract therein set .up, but sought to avoid the same upon the ground that he had not read it, and did not know its contents at the time he executed it. *Held:*There being a valid special contract, appellee was bound by its terms, and could recover only upon such contract. He could not avoid such contract on the ground that he had not read or did not know its contents when he executed it. *[Ante,*§ 331; Hutch, on Carriers, §§ 239, 211, 215, 751, 762.]

June 24, 1885.

Reversed and remanded.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 60371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24488]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-119046-10]
RIN 1545-BJ54


Requirements of a Statement Disclosing Uncertain Tax Positions; 
Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking and a notice of 
public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to a notice of proposed 
rulemaking and a notice of public hearing that was published in the 
Federal Register on Thursday, September 9, 2010 (75 FR 54802) allowing 
the IRS to require corporations to file a schedule disclosing uncertain 
tax positions related to the tax return as required by the IRS.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathryn Zuba, (202) 622-3400 (not 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The correction notice that is the subject of this document is under 
section 6012 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of 
public hearing (REG-119046-10) contains an error that may prove to be 
misleading and is in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking 
and notice of public hearing (REG-119046-10), which was the subject of 
FR Doc. 2010-22624, is corrected as follows:
    On page 54802, column 3, under the caption DATES, lines 4 and 5, 
the language ``public hearing scheduled for October 15, 2010, at 10 
a.m., must be received'' is corrected to read ``public hearing 
scheduled for October 19, 2010, at 10 a.m., must be received''

LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2010-24488 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-56961 and No. 333-70137) of Brigham Exploration
Company of our report dated March 30, 1999 which appears on page F1-2 of this
Form 10-KA of Brigham Exploration Company. We also consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report on the financial statements of Brigham Oil & Gas LP;
Brigham Holdings I, LLC; Brigham Holdings II, LLC and Brigham Inc. which appears
on page F2-1 of this Form 10-KA.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
April 14, 1999
#### R.M.F., Appellant, v. D.C., Appellee.

No. 2D10-250.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 25, 2011.

Kathy C. George of Law Offices of Kathy C. George, Dunedin, for Appellant.

Vitas J. Lukas of Bouldin & Associates, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellee.

SILBERMAN, Judge.

R.M.F., the Father, seeks review of a final judgment of paternity and challenges the award of attorney’s fees to D.C., the Mother, and the visitation schedule set forth therein. The lack of a trial transcript precludes this court from reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Mother’s entitlement to attorney’s fees and the visitation schedule. *See Smith v. Smith,*39 So.3d 458, 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). However, we reverse that portion of the final judgment awarding attorney’s fees because the final judgment does not contain any findings justifying the amount of the award. *See Macarty v. Macarty,*29 So.3d 434, 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CASANUEVA, C.J., and WHATLEY, J., Concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132303 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

DETROIT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff, Justices 

v SC: 132303 

 COA: 267715 
 Wayne CC: 04-413781-CK

URS CORPORATION, DESIGN COLLECTIVE 

and TDC/URS, a/k/a TDC/URS CORPORATION, 

Defendants/Third-Party PlaintiffsAppellants,

and 

MARK ENGLISH, EMMETT B. HAGOOD, JR., 

CAROLE HARRIS, GARY BALDWIN, HARISH 

CHOPIA, CINDY GARCIA, THOMAS 

HAMPSON, WILLIAM STEVENSON and 

BEVERLY HANNAH JONES,

 Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, 

v 

BAILEY TURNER VENTURE, EL BAILEY 

COMPANY, INC., AND TURNER

CONSTRUCTION, 

Third-Party Defendants/Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0220 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2007 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being, Cornelis F. Wit, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|/s/ Cornelis F. Wit                                            
|Cornelis F. Wit President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director

October 5, 2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.