alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.3






Exhibit 4.3








	Stock Certificate



















 








	THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
THE COMPANY WILL FURNISH WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH SHAREHOLDER WHO SO REQUESTS, A SUMMARY OF THE
POWERS, DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE, PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL OR OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF
EACH CLASS OF STOCK OF THE COMPANY AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH
PREFERENCES AND RIGHTS, AND THE VARIATIONS IN RIGHTS, PREFERENCES AND LIMITATIONS DETERMINED FOR
EACH SERIES, WHICH ARE FIXED BY THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF THE COMPANY, AS AMENDED, AND THE
RESOLUTIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY, AND THE AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
TO DETERMINE VARIATIONS FOR FUTURE SERIES. SUCH REQUEST MAY BE MADE TO THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
OF THE COMPANY OR TO THE TRANSFER AGENT. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MAY REQUIRE THE OWNER OF A LOST OR
DESTROYED STOCK CERTIFICATE, OR HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, TO GIVE THE COMPANY A BOND TO INDEMNIFY
IT AND ITS TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS AGAINST ANY CLAIM THAT MAY BE MADE AGAINST THEM ON
ACCOUNT OF THE ALLEGED LOSS OR DESTRUCTION OF ANY SUCH CERTIFICATE.
THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS INSTRUMENT ARE NOT SAVINGS ACCOUNTS, DEPOSITS OR OTHER
OBLIGATIONS OF A BANK AND ARE NOT INSURED BY THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION OR ANY
OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY.
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,
shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations:
TEN COM — as tenants in commonUNIF GIFT MIN ACT-Custodian
(Cust)(Minor)
TEN ENT — as tenants by the entireties            under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
(State)
JT TEN -as joint tenants with right of survivorship            UNIF TRF MIN ACT .. Custodian (until age. . .)
and not as tenants in common (Cust) (Minor)
under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act
(State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
For value received,hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE. OF ASSIGNEE)
Shares
of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
Attorney
to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.
Oaten- 20 Signature(s) Guaranteed: Medallion Guarantee Stamp
THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks,
Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations
and Credit Unions) WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN
APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION
PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
Signature:
Signature:
Notice: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the certificate, in every
particular, without alteration or enlargement, or any change whatever.
SECURITY INSTRUCTIONS
THIS IS WATERMARKED PAPER, DO NOT ACCEPT WITHOUT NOTING
WATERMARK. HOLD TO LIGHT TO VERIFY WATERMARK.
#### Nellie Louise CARSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 20441.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 5, 1964.

*785William H. Moore, Jr., Atlanta, Harvey J. Kennedy, Barnesville, Ga., Paul L. Wayman, Atlanta, Ga., on the brief, for appellant.

Donald H. Fraser, U. S. Atty., Savannah, Ga., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, WISDOM, Circuit Judge, and CARSWELL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of passing counterfeit money. During a search of her apartment, federal agents seized a sweater which defendant was said to have purchased with a counterfeit bill. Defendant maintains that the search was illegal but the district court found, and the evidence supports the conclusion, that defendant rendered the search legal by her consent. During a detention alleged to be illegal, defendant was forced to pose for various photographs in addition to the regular “mug” shots. Neither the sweater nor the photographs were introduced into evidence at her trial. Both were shown to witnesses to “firm up” their identifications after they had already made a positive identification of the defendant. The articles were shown to every witness who identified and testified against defendant at her trial.

The reach of the “fruit of the forbidden tree” doctrine (Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 1920, 251 U.S. 385, 40 S.Ct. 182, 64 L.Ed. 319) is not limitless. We hold that even if the photographs were the fruits of an illegal detention, their connection with the evidence introduced at trial is too attenuated to taint it.

The defendant’s motion for rehearing is denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-3397-031-2-443-CV

IN RE GLENBROOK RESIDENTIAL, INC.InN rReE CiItTyY oOfF MaAnNsSfFiIeElLdD ZoOnNiInNgG BoOaArRdD oOfF AdDjJuUsStTmMeEnNtT	RELATOR

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

InN rReE TaArRgGaA ReEsSoOuUrRcCeEsS InNvVeEsStTmMeEnNtTsS InNcC. a	RELATORS

AnNdD GiIlLbBeErRtToO G. PeEnNaA

		------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	We have considered “rRelator’s’ “mOTIONMotion ToVoluntary dDismissal MOtionMotion Withdraw Petitiionon For WRitWrit oAgreed Motion For Dismissal Of Mandamus .”  Proceeding.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss this original proceeding.

	Relators shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

							PER CURIAM

PANEL BA:	    MEIER, DUAUPHINOT, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, and MCCOYMEIER, JJ.WALKER, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  April mARCH March 1-4, 2007299, -2,2010
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13** 

**- 1403** 

ALBERT JAMES GOMES; ARLENE MARIA GOMES

,

Petitioner s ,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General

,

Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : November 19, 2013 Decided: December 16, 2013

Before SHEDD

, KEENAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Rishi P. Oza, ROBERT BROWN LLC, Cleveland, Ohio , for
Petitioner s . Stuart F. Deler y, Assistant Attorney General, William C. Peachey, Assistant Director, Lindsay Corliss , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respond ent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Albert James Gomes a nd his wife, Arlene Maria Gomes

,

natives and citizens of Bangladesh

, petition for review of an

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying

their motion to reconsider . We have reviewed the record and the

Board’s order and conclude that the Board did not abuse its

discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b)

(2013). We therefore deny the petition for review. See In re:

Gomes (B.I.A. Feb. 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles Benjamin CAMP.

No. 2011-K-0954.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Camp, Charles Benjamin; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 158,154; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,052-KA.

Denied.
#### Willie L. JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D10-2662.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 25, 2011.

Willie L. Jackson, pro se.

KHOUZAM, Judge.

Willie L. Jackson appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because the postconviction court failed to attach any record documents conclusively showing that Jackson is entitled to no relief, we must reverse. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D). If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the claims, the court shall attach record documents conclusively showing that Jackson is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT and KELLY, JJ„ concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT NO.4


                      COMMENTS BY AUDITOR FOR U.S. READERS
                      ON CANADA-U.S. REPORTING DIFFERENCE


In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of
an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when there is a
change in accounting principles that has a material effect on the comparability
of the company's financial statements, such as the change described in Note
2(s) to the financial statements. Our report to the shareholders dated
September 2, 2004 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards
which do not require a reference to such a change in accounting principles in
the auditor's report when the change is properly accounted for and adequately
disclosed in the financial statements.


/s/  KPMG LLP
----------------------
KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada
September 2, 2004
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of WidePoint Corporation on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve L. Komar, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.



By: /s/  STEVE L. KOMAR
-------------------------------
Steve L. Komar,
Chief Executive Officer
The State of TexasAppellee/s 

# Fourth Cou **rt of Appeals San Antonio, Texas**  January 30 , 2014 N os. 04
- 13
- 00834
- CR & 04
- 13
- 00835
- CR Albert NICOLAS , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court Nos. B93
- 6 & B93
- 7 Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding 

### ORDER In the interest of the efficient administration of the court’s docket, we order Appeal Nos. 04
- 13
- 00834
- cR and 13
- 00835
- CR consolidated. The parties must file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were one but put both appeal numbers in t he style of the case. However, a record must be filed in each appeal, the record in each case will remain separate and, if supplementation of the record becomes necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in the appeal to which it applies. The cas es must be argued together in one brief, as in a single appeal, and if oral argument is requested and granted, the entire case must be argued as a single appeal, with the total time limit for each party equal to the ordinary time limit for a party in a sin gle appeal. The court will dispose of both appeals in the same judgment, opinion, and mandate.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 30th day of January, 2014 .

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Exhibit 21.1

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

Name of Subsidiary                        State or Jurisdiction of Incorporation

3013439 Nova Scotia Company               Province of Nova Scotia

504087 N.B. Inc.                          Province of New Brunswick

Comvestrix Corp.                          Delaware

Computer Output Systems, Inc.             Connecticut

Direct Mail Services, Inc.                New Jersey

Electronic Imaging Services, Inc.         Delaware

First Class Presort, Inc.                 New Jersey

Image Printing Systems, Inc.              Wisconsin

Lirpaco, Inc.                             Canadian (federal)

Moreau Promotional Services, Inc.         Province of Ontario

Mystic Graphic Systems, Inc.              Massachusetts

Quality Control Printing, Inc.            New Jersey

Vestcom Investments, Inc.                 New Jersey

Vestcom Rhode Island Corp.                Rhode Island

Vestcom St. Louis, Inc.                   Delaware
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10KSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         358,833
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  183,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,080
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               562,935
<PP&E>                                       3,334,102
<DEPRECIATION>                                 974,668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,987,281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,194,597
<BONDS>                                      1,669,628
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,487
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,987,281
<SALES>                                      1,361,212
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,443,545
<CGS>                                          860,513
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,716,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               174,641
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             211,390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (659,165)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (659,165)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (659,165)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.20)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 13.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ Chitung LiuName:
    Chitung LiuTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer 
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1473 

AN ACT 

To amend the Child Care and Development Block Grant 

Act of 1990 to require child care providers to provide 

to parents information regarding whether such providers 

carry current liability insurance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1473 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Anthony DeJuan 

3 Boatwright Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

5 Section 658e(c)(2) of the Child Care and Develop6 ment Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858c(c)(2)) 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) in subparagraph (E)(i) by adding at the end 

9 the following: ‘‘The State shall include as part of its 

10 regulatory process for issuance and renewal of li11 censes to providers of child care services, a rec12 ommendation to each provider that it carry current 

13 liability insurance covering the operation of its child 

14 care business.’’, and 

15 (2) in subparagraph (F)— 

16 (A) in clause (ii) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

17 end, 

18 (B) in clause (iii) by striking the period at 

19 the end and inserting a semicolon, 

20 (C) by inserting after clause (iii) the fol21 lowing: 

22 ‘‘(iv) a requirement that each licensed 

23 child care provider— 

24 ‘‘(I) post publicly and conspicu25 ously in the service area of its prem26 ises a notice specifying whether or not 
3 

•HR 1473 EH

1 such provider carries current liability 

2 insurance covering the operation of its 

3 child care business; 

4 ‘‘(II) provide to parents of chil5 dren to whom it provides child care 

6 services a written notice stating 

7 whether or not such provider carries 

8 current liability insurance covering the 

9 operation of its child care business, 

10 including the amount of any such cov11 erage; 

12 ‘‘(III) obtain the signature of at 

13 least 1 parent of each such child on 

14 such written notice acknowledging 

15 that such parent has received such no16 tice; and 

17 ‘‘(IV) maintain such notice (or a 

18 copy of such notice) as signed by such 

19 parents (or a copy of the signed no20 tice) in such provider’s records during 

21 the period in which the child receives 

22 such services.’’, and 

23 (D) in the last sentence by inserting 

24 ‘‘clauses (i), (ii), or (iii) of’’ after ‘‘Nothing in’’. 
4 

•HR 1473 EH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

3 take effect on October 1 of the 1st fiscal year that begins 

4 more than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this 

5 Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 29, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1473 

AN ACT 

To amend the Child Care and Development Block 

surance. whether such providers carry current liability into provide to parents information regarding Grant Act of 1990 to require child care providers
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-51001 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARLOS GONZALEZ-ANTUNA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-1021-ALL-KC

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos GonzalezAntuna raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense, and by United States v. Pineiro , 377 F.3d 464, 465-66 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263), which held that Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), does notNo. 04-51001 -2- apply to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 10909 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Gerardo Silva,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:21
- CR
- 58 - 2

**______________________________** Before **Wiener, Stewart,** and **Douglas,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Gerardo Silva has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Silva has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rel evant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 21, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10909 Document: 61-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/21/2024No. 23
- 10909

2 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further respo nsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-10909 Document: 61-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/21/2024
627 A.2d 1127

#### IN THE MATTER OF THE LIQUIDATION OF INTEGRITY INSURANCE COMPANY. INTEGRITY INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. FONAR CORPORATION.

March 17, 1993.

ORDER

The parties having stipulated to a dismissal of this matter, it is ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1714 

AN ACT 

To clarify the boundaries of Coastal Barrier Resources 

System Clam Pass Unit FL–64P. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1714 EH

1 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN COASTAL BAR2 RIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAPS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map subtitled ‘‘FL–64P’’, re4 lating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System unit des5 ignated as Coastal Barrier Resources System Clam Pass 

6 Unit FL–64P, that is included in the set of maps entitled 

7 ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ and referred to in 

8 section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

9 U.S.C. 3503(a)), is hereby replaced by another map relat10 ing to that unit entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources Sys11 tem Clam Pass Unit, FL–64P’’ and dated July 21, 2005 

12 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

13 shall keep the map referred to in subsection (a) on file 

14 and available for inspection in accordance with section 

15 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 

16 3503(b)). 

Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1714 

AN ACT 

Resources System Clam Pass Unit FL–64P. 

To clarify the boundaries of Coastal Barrier
856 A.2d 33

#### In the Matter of Frederick S. SCHOFIELD, III.

No. 289 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

June 29, 2004.

*387
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2004, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated March 23, 2004, the Petition for Reinstatement is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.