alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-QSB FOR
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         665,484
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     75,057
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               745,606
<PP&E>                                          29,474
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 783,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,279
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,400
<OTHER-SE>                                     777,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   783,133
<SALES>                                          1,827
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,945
<CGS>                                              642
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                79,945
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (70,642)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (70,642)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (70,642)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.003)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*RAFAEL MARTINEZ

(AC 22510)

Dranginis, Bishop and West, Js.

Argued May 5

officially released May 20, 2003

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AT JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,879
<SECURITIES>                                     1,146
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,525
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,640
<INVENTORY>                                      6,809
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,564
<PP&E>                                         216,940
<DEPRECIATION>                                  82,462
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,023
<BONDS>                                         96,361
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,317
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,593
<SALES>                                         68,211
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,555
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,363
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,174
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,786
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,263
<INCOME-TAX>                                       551
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,712
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,712
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40


</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D 17

- 4711

_____________________________

T RAVIS J ONES

,

Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA

,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. James C. Hankinson , Judge

.

November 7, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.

This court issued an order on September 1 4, 2018, directing Appellant to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed against him in view of his having instituted numerous repetitive, meritless proceedings in this court. See State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999). Appellant has failed to respon d or provide a legal basis to justify withholding imposition of sanctions.

Appellant is hereby prohibited from filing any pro se filings in this Court challenging his conviction and sentence imposed in Leon County Circuit Court case number 2006

- CF

- 1004

. The Clerk of this Court is directed to not accept any filings in this case unless they are signed by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar.2 Additionally, we find this appeal is a frivolous proceeding brought before this Court by a state priso ner. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2017). We direct the clerk to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution or facility within the Florida Department of Corrections for disciplinary procedures pursuant to department rules.

M A KAR

, O STERHAUS

, and J AY

, JJ., concur

.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or

9.331

.

_____________________________

Travis Jones

, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
627 A.2d 1128

#### WARREN GIDNEY v. TOWNSHIP OF PENNSAUKEN, ET AL. AND CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE, ET AL.

March 26, 1993.

ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for failure to state a substantial constitutional issue within the meaning of the requirements of *Rule*2:2-l(a)(l) and applicable case law.
#### In re James S. ANDES.

No. 2011-OB-0865.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 4, 2011.

ON APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR.

PER CURIAM.*

After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude petitioner, James S. Andes, is immediately eligible to be conditionally admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana, subject to a probationary period of two years. The probationary period shall commence from the date petitioner, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and the probation monitor execute a formal probation plan. During the probationary period, petitioner shall comply with all of the terms and conditions of the consent agreement executed by him with the Louisiana Supreme Court Committee on Bar Admissions, and such other conditions as may be imposed upon him by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel. Should petitioner fail to make a good faith effort to satisfy these conditions, or should he commit any misconduct during the period of probation, his conditional right to practice may be terminated or he may be subjected to oth*607er discipline pursuant to the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement.

CONDITIONAL ADMISSION GRANTED.

*

 Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  financial  information  extracted from the consolidated
financial statements of FirstSpartan Financial Corp. for the year ended June 30,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial  statements
(dollars in thousands).
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,638
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          42,302
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,480
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     23,344
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              54
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                55
<LOANS>                                        444,165
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,896
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 545,725
<DEPOSITS>                                     406,011
<SHORT-TERM>                                    35,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,673
<LONG-TERM>                                     34,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,041
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 545,725
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 34,811
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,814
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                38,625
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              16,885
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,366
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           20,259
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      800
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (53)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,980
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,577
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,577
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,975
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.36
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.97
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,221
<LOANS-PAST>                                       300
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   672
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,176
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,179
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       85
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,896
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,896
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                            1,208,488
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       354,805
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                         454,026
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,393,616
<PP&E>                              281,145
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    3,491,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,108,153
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                         13,712,572
<OTHER-SE>                      (11,329,340)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      3,491,385
<SALES>                           2,715,124
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  2,715,124
<CGS>                               568,314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       568,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  3,557,517
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  (49,581)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (1,361,126)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,361,126)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (1,361,126)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.22)
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph ALEXANDER.

No. 2011-KP-1096.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

In re Alexander, Joseph; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. M, No. 08-4076; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KH-304.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. *See also State v. Cotton,*09-2397 (La.10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030; *State v. Thomas,*08-2912 (La.10/16/09), 19 So.3d 466.
#### G., C. & S. F. R’y Co. v. H. Conner.

(No. 1590.)

Error from Colorado County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 199. *Certiorari; motion to dismiss must be made at the return term; supplemental motion.*The rule is well settled that a motion to dismiss or quash a writ of *certiorari*cannot be made after the return term. [O’Brien v. Dunn, 5 Tex. 574; Ables v. Pearle, 10 Tex. 285; Gabel v. City of Houston, 29 Tex. 335; Mowery v. Lanson, 12 Tex. 31.] And the fact that a motion was made and overruled at the return term does not authorize a supplemental motion, embracing additional grounds, to be made and determined at a succeeding term of the court. [Holt v. McCaskey, 14 Tex. 229; Maurice v. Crowell, 4 Tex. *99Law Journal, p. 418.] The *certiorari*in this case was dismissed upon a supplemental motion made after the return term, and after a motion to dismiss had been made and overruled at the return term. *Held,*error.

February *27,*1884.

Ee versed and remanded.
#### Earl BRASSEAUX v. Donald J. PENNY, ABC Insurance Company, Walter D. Pray and/or Dub’s Tree Care *&*Removal, Inc., Carl Ferguson and/or Ferguson Tree Care, L.L.C., James A. Teague Rental Equipment, Inc., and/or Teague Rental Equipment, Ozark Insurance Company, Def Insurance Company and-GHI Insurance Company, USAgencies Casualty Insurance Company, Inc., Colony Insurance Company, Western World Insurance Company, et al.

No. 2011-CC-0050.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Western World Insurance Company; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. M, No. 569,981; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 1652.

Denied.

CLARK, J., would grant.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Pacific Systems Control Technology, Inc.
(formerly American Champion Entertainment, Inc.):

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Numbers 333-60511, 333-67879, 333-72253, 333-82963, 333-90459 and 333-30626 on Forms S-3, Registration Statement Numbers 333-60107, 333-80269, 333-95435,333-96419 and 333-54144 (Pacific Systems Control Technology, Inc. 1997 Stock Plan and 1997 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan of Pacific Systems Control Technology, Inc.) on Forms S-8 and Registration Statement Number 333-39206 on Form SB-2 of our report dated March 6, 2002, appearing in and incorporated by reference in this 10-KSB of Pacific Systems Control Technology, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001.

/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Moss Adams LLP

San Francisco, California
April 15, 2002
#### W. T. Rutherford et al. v. J. H. Davenport et al.

(No. 6910.)

Error from Eastland County.

R. B. Truly, counsel for plaintiffs in error.

No counsel appeared for defendants in error.

April 29, 1891.

Opinion by

Davidson, J.

§ 244. *Citation; return on, must show a true copy to have been delivered each defendant to support judgment by default.*Defendants in error brought suit in the county court of Eastland county against plaintiffs in error on a promissory note for $500, and obtained a judgment thereon for the sum of $475 against said plaintiffs in error. Plaintiffs in error bring their writ of error to this court, and ask a reversal on the sole ground that the return of the sheriff on the writ of citation fails to show that a true copy thereof was delivered to each of said plaintiffs in error before the judgment was rendered. Said judgment was taken by default. We find from an inspection of the record that it does not appear from the return of the officer that the service was made as required bylaw, but that, on the contrary, it is doubtful that all of the

plaintiffs in error, seven in number, were served with one and the same copy of the citation. This is not sufficient. It must appear by the return of the officer serving the process that a true copy thereof was delivered to each of the named defendants therein. [R. S., art. 1219; 2 Willson, Civil Cas. Ct. App., § 269; King v. Goodson, 42 Tex. 152; Holliday v. Steele, 65 Tex. 388; Covington v. Burleson, 28 Tex. 368; Willis v. Bryan, 33 Tex. 429.] Eor this error the judgment must be reversed.

Reversed and remanded.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**892 CA 12-00396**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

W.J. CAMPERLINO CUSTOM HOMES, INC. AND W. JAMES CAMPERLINO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V ORDER

CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

LONGSTREET & BERRY, LLP, SYRACUSE (MICHAEL J. LONGSTREET OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (JOHN A. MANCUSO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Anthony J. Paris, J.), entered August 11, 2011. The judgment, among other things, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint, declared that defendant has no duty to defend and indemnify plaintiffs and denied the cross motion of plaintiffs for partial summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: September 28, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 11

              Statement Regarding Computation of Earnings Per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          Three Months
                                                                          Ended 9/30/97
                                                                          -------------
<S>                                                                            <C>
Net Earnings                                                              $   246,824
                                                                          ===========

Primary earnings per share:
     Weighted average shares outstanding                                      425,540

     Less unearned employee stock ownership plan shares                       (18,019)

     Average option shares granted                                             37,021

     Less assumed purchase of shares using treasury method                    (21,480)
                                                                             =========

Common and common equivalent shares outstanding                               423,062
                                                                             ========

Earnings per common share - primary                                       $      0.58
                                                                          ===========

Fully - diluted earnings per share:
     Weighted average shares outstanding                                      425,540

     Less unearned employee stock ownership plan shares                       (18,019)

     Average option shares granted                                             37,021

     Less assumed purchase of shares using treasury method                    (20,520)
                                                                              ========

Common and common equivalent shares outstanding                               424,022
                                                                              =======

Earnings per common share - fully diluted                                 $      0.58
                                                                          ===========
</TABLE>


                                      -12-
Exhibit 32.2

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fentura Financial, Inc. (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, James W. Distelrath, Chief Financial Officer of Fentura Financial Inc. certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                                                         
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 3, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ James W. Distelrath                                 
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | James W. Distelrath                                     
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer