alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1594 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 18 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Received 

AN ACT 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 

Clinic in Hermitage, Pennsylvania, as the Michael A. 

Marzano Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 

Clinic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HR 1594 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MICHAEL A. MARZANO DE2 PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUT3 PATIENT CLINIC. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Af5 fairs Outpatient Clinic in Hermitage, Pennsylvania, shall 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and 

7 designated as the ‘‘Michael A. Marzano Department of 

8 Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula10 tion, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

11 States to the outpatient clinic referred to in subsection 

12 (a) shall be considered to be a reference to the Michael 

13 A. Marzano Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 

14 Clinic. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 

2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### Henry BOLDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D10-1489.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 9, 2010.

Henry Bolden, Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*Affirmed. Anthony v. State,*980 So.2d 610 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); *see also Florida v. Powell,*— U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1195, 175 L.Ed.2d 1009 (2010).

POLEN, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GENERAL
MEDIA, INC'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996  
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996  
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996 
<CASH>                                         7,211        
<SECURITIES>                                   0            
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,689       
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0            
<INVENTORY>                                    4,573        
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               29,227       
<PP&E>                                         4,961        
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0            
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 46,227       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          32,860       
<BONDS>                                        79,245       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0            
<PREFERRED>                                    0            
<COMMON>                                       5            
<OTHER-SE>                                     (74,141)     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   46,227       
<SALES>                                        85,757       
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               85,757       
<CGS>                                          45,568       
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  34,464       
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               558          
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0            
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,431        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,076)      
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0            
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,076)      
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0            
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0            
<CHANGES>                                      0            
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,076)      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0            
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0            
                                               


</TABLE>
628 A.2d 287

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ARTURO R. WHYTE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FITZ G. BYFIELD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BARRINGTON AIRD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Argued May 4, 1993

Decided August 2, 1993.

*Joshua P. Cohn,*Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant *(John J. Fahy,*Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney).

*Michael Chazen,*Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent Arturo R. Whyte *(Zulima V. Farber,*Public Defender, attorney).

*Terry Shaw,*Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent Fitz G. Byfield *(Zulima V. Farber,*Public Defender, attorney).

*James W. Donnelly,*Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent Barrington Aird *(Zulima V. Farber,*Public Defender, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 265 *N.J.Super.*518, 628 A.2d 340 (1992).

WILENTZ, C.J., and HANDLER and GARIBALDI, JJ.,

dissenting.

We would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Shebell’s dissenting opinion, reported at 265 *N.J.Super.*518, 628 A.2d 340 (1992).

*482
      *For affirmance*— Justices CLIFFORD, POLLOCK, O’HERN and STEIN-4

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and HANDLER and GARIBALDI — 3
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Eric MIX.

No. 2011-KK-0008.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 4, 2011.

In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 499-010; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-1729.

Writ denied. Stay denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARGALENA GERBACIO-GASPAR,

a.k.a. Margarita Morales-Cruz,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71946

Agency No. A099-581-009

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 19, 2012** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Margalena Gerbacio-Gaspar, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying her application for withholding of removal. 

FILED

DEC 21 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-71946

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006), and

we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that any harm GerbacioGaspar alleged or fears is not on account of a protected ground. See Zetino v.

Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1015-16 (9th Cir. 2010); see also Parussimova v. Mukasey,

555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2009) (“[t]he Real ID Act requires that a protected

ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an asylum applicant’s persecution”). 

Accordingly, Gerbacio-Gaspar’s withholding of removal claim fails. See Zetino at

1015-16.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
WWW.EXFILE.COM -- 888-775-4789 -- BOSTON SCIENTIFIC -- FORM 8-K -- EXHIBIT 10.5 -- 16230


    EXHIBIT
10.5

     

     

    THE
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

    EXECUTIVE
RETIREMENT PLAN

    


    FIRST
AMENDMENT

    


    Pursuant
to Section 14 of the Boston Scientific Executive Retirement Plan, as effective
May 9, 2005 (the “Plan”), Boston Scientific Corporation hereby amends the Plan
as follows:

    


    
      	
              1.  

            	
              Effective
      January 1, 2009, Section 3 is amended by adding at the end of the section
      the following:  “A Participant will not be considered to have
      Retired for purposes of this Plan unless the Participant’s actual date
      of  Retirement constitutes a “separation from service” within
      the meaning of Section 1.409A-1(h) of the Treasury
      Regulations.”

            


    

     

    
      	
              2.  

            	
              Effective
      January 1, 2009, the last two sentences of Section 6 are amended to read
      as follows:  “Payment will be made to a retired Participant in
      the first payroll period after the last day of the six month period
      following the actual date of
Retirement.”

            


    

     

    
      	
              3.  

            	
              Effective
      January 1, 2009, the last sentence of Section 7 is amended to read as
      follows:  “Payment will be made in a lump sum in cash within 60
      days following the death of the
Participant.”

            


    

     

    
      	
              4.  

            	
              Effective
      January 1, 2009, the third and fourth sentences of Section 13 are amended
      to read as follows:  “The retainer fee will be paid in a lump
      sum to the eligible participant in the first payroll period after the last
      day of the six month period following the actual date of
      Retirement.”

            


    

     

    


     

     

    *  *  *  *  *

     

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Boston Scientific Corporation has caused this amendment to be
executed in its name and on its behalf effective as of the dates set forth
herein by an officer or a duly authorized delegate.

     

     

    
 

    


    BOSTON SCIENTIFIC
CORPORATION

    


    


    


    By:           ___________________________

    


    


    Title:        ___________________________

    


    


    Date:        ___________________________
News United States Air Force
 Air Force, Space Force to offer medals, promotions for recruiting supportPublished May 18, 2023
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS)  --**
                Airmen and Guardians can now receive decorations or promotions through recruiting referrals under the new Airman and Guardian Referral Program.Two new programs, Stellar Talent Acquisition Recruiting Referral and Stripes for Referrals, aim to incentivize all Airmen and Guardians to inspire the next generation to serve in the Air Force and Space Force.
            
            
            Photo Details /
                Download Hi-Res

    










STARR authorizes enlisted service members up to senior master sergeant and officers up to lieutenant colonel to receive up to two Air and Space Achievement Medals for referring three enlisted accessions applicants who depart for basic military training.

Additionally, any enlisted member, or officer up to colonel, may receive the Air and Space Commendation Medal for referring five enlisted accessions applicants who depart for basic military training.

Stripes for Referrals allows Airman and Guardian recruits to be promoted up to E-2 by referring two enlisted accessions candidates, or to E-3 by referring four enlisted accessions candidates who join the Delayed Entry Program or Delayed Entry Training.

Applications must be submitted through the **Aim High application** to qualify for the Air and Space Achievement and Commendation Medals. All users must create an account and input needed information in the ‘Refer a Friend’ portion of the app in order to receive credit for valid referrals.Two new programs, Stellar Talent Acquisition Recruiting Referral and Stripes for Referrals, aim to incentivize all Airmen and Guardians to inspire the next generation to serve in the Air Force and Space Force.
            
            
            Photo Details /
                Download Hi-Res

    









More information on the STARR program can be found in **DAFMAN 36-2806** and Stripes for Referrals in **DAFMAN 36-2032**.

To submit referrals via application:
- Download the Aim High Application on your mobile device
- Create an account using your full, first and last name, and your .mil email address
- Open the application and look for the three horizonal lines at the bottom right labeled, ‘more’
- Select “more” and scroll to the bottom, and select ‘Refer a Friend’FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



space force 



promotion 



recruiting 



support 



referral 



decoration 



Airman and Guardian Referral Program 



Air and Space Achievement Medal 



accessions 



Air and Space Commendation Medal
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Brigham Exploration
Company (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, for the period ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr., Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 10, 2003

/s/  Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr.
----------------------------
Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
<PAGE>


                                                       Exhibit 21.1

<TABLE>
                      LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                     (as of March 30, 2000)

<CAPTION>
Corporation                                               State
-----------                                               -----
<S>                                                       <C>
Unified Management Corporation                            Indiana
Unified Fund Services, Inc.                               Indiana
First Lexington Trust Company                             Kentucky
Health Financial, Inc.                                    Kentucky
Unified Internet Services, Inc.                           Indiana
Unified Investment Advisers, Inc.                         Delaware
Fiduciary Counsel, Inc.                                   Delaware
EMCO Estate Management Company, Inc.                      Delaware
AmeriPrime Financial Services, Inc.                       Texas
   AmeriPrime Financial Securities, Inc.                  Texas
Equity Underwriting Group, Inc.                           Kentucky
   Equity Insurance Managers, Inc.                        Kentucky
     Equity Insurance Managers of Illinois, L.L.C.
        (d/b/a Irland & Rogers)                           Illinois
   21st Century Claims Service, Inc.                      Kentucky
   Equity Insurance Administrators, Inc.                  Kentucky
Commonwealth Premium Finance Corporation                  Kentucky
Strategic Fund Services, Inc.                             Delaware
Smart Associates, Inc.                                    Delaware
Unified.com, Inc.                                         Delaware
Archer Trading, Inc.                                      Delaware
Unified Employee Services, Inc.                           Delaware
Fully Armed Productions, inc.                             Kentucky
VSX Technologies, Inc.                                    New York
Unified Capital Resources, Inc.                           New York
Unified Investment Services, Inc.                         Kentucky
Unified Banking Company                                   Federal
VSX.com, Inc.                                             Delaware
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I,Robert P. Stanojev, certify that:

 

1.     I havereviewed this Form 10-Q/A of Alternative Resources Corporation;

 

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluations; and

 

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.

 

 

 
| Date:  January 28, 2004 | /s/ Robert P. Stanojev |                    |
|------------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------|
|                         |                   | Robert P. Stanojev      |   |
|                         |                   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                         |                   |

 

----
Order filed June 6, 2013

In The 

### Court of Appeals

For The 

### First District of Texas

___________ NO. 01

- 12

- 01026

- CR

____________ ROBERT MICHAEL GOMEZ , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 405th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10CR3362



### ORDERThis court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State’s exhibit 25,
State's exhibit 26 and Defendant’s exhibit 1.

The clerk of the 405th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this court the original of State’s exhibit 25 and 26 and Defendant’s exhibit 1, on or
before June 17, 2013

. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State’s exhibits 25 and 26 and Defendant’s exhibit 1, to the clerk of the 405th District
Court.

PER CURIAM
#### Freddie R. LEWIS v. Timothy WILKINSON, Warden, et al.

No. 2011-CI-0149.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re Lewis, Freddie R.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 585,903; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 0771.

Denied-
Exhibit 99.1


                 CANCELLATION OF ACQUISITION AGREEMENT BETWEEN
                            XYNERGY CORPORATION AND
                          WEB MARKETING NETWORK, INC.



This agreement is set forth on August 26, 2002, Xynergy Corporation, hereafter
referred to as XYNY, and Web Marketing Network incorporated, hereafter referred
to as WMN, hereby agree to dissolve the previous acquisition agreement entered
into on January 10, 2002.

WMN acknowledges that due to unfavorable market conditions, insufficient
financing, and other internal issues, it has not been able to meet the growth
and profitability levels expected by XYNY at the time of the acquisition. WMN
also acknowledges that, due to the aforementioned, it has been unable to provide
XYNY wit the audited financials required by SEC regulations.

Both XYNY and WMN agree to a mutual release from any further obligations, and
each party acknowledges that there are no outstanding issues or financial
obligations, unresolved. XYNY agrees to return all outstanding common shares,
and all intellectual and corporate property related to the acquisition of WMN,
and WMN and Russell Rockefeller agree to return all common shares of XYNY.

Xynergy Corporation                             Web Marketing Network, Inc.



/s/                                             /s/
Edward A. Rose, Jr., CEO                        Russell Rockefeller, President

Dated:  8/26/02                                 Dated:  8/26/02
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JUSTIN DUANE CORBRAY,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-30185

D.C. No. 2:08-cr-02027-FVS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Fred L. Van Sickle, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2012** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. 

Justin Duane Corbray appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed

following the revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

FILED

MAR 05 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-30185

Corbray contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to

calculate the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range. This contention lacks merit

as the record reflects that the district court adopted the undisputed Guidelines range

calculated in the petition to revoke supervised release, and provided sufficient

reasons for imposing a sentence at the statutory maximum. See United States v.

Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008). 

Corbray also contends that the sentence imposed is substantively

unreasonable. The sentence is substantively reasonable under the totality of the

circumstances and in light of the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. 

§§ 3553(a) and 3553(e). See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); United

States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th Cir. 2006). 

AFFIRMED.