```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1495 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1495

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
  To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
 resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
                         and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.
    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 2007''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act is as 
follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.

                    TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 1001. Project authorizations.
Sec. 1002. Small projects for flood damage reduction.
Sec. 1003. Small projects for emergency streambank protection.
Sec. 1004. Small projects for navigation.
Sec. 1005. Small projects for improvement of the quality of the 
          environment.
Sec. 1006. Small projects for aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 1007. Small projects for shoreline protection.
Sec. 1008. Small projects for snagging and sediment removal.
Sec. 1009. Small projects to prevent or mitigate damage caused by 
          navigation projects.
Sec. 1010. Small projects for aquatic plant control.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 2001. Non-Federal contributions.
Sec. 2002. Funding to process permits.
Sec. 2003. Written agreement for water resources projects.
Sec. 2004. Compilation of laws.
Sec. 2005. Dredged material disposal.
Sec. 2006. Remote and subsistence harbors.
Sec. 2007. Use of other Federal funds.
Sec. 2008. Revision of project partnership agreement; cost sharing.
Sec. 2009. Expedited actions for emergency flood damage reduction.
Sec. 2010. Watershed and river basin assessments.
Sec. 2011. Tribal partnership program.
Sec. 2012. Wildfire firefighting.
Sec. 2013. Technical assistance.
Sec. 2014. Lakes program.
Sec. 2015. Cooperative agreements.
Sec. 2016. Training funds.
Sec. 2017. Access to water resource data.
Sec. 2018. Shore protection projects.
Sec. 2019. Ability to pay.
Sec. 2020. Aquatic ecosystem and estuary restoration.
Sec. 2021. Small flood damage reduction projects.
Sec. 2022. Small river and harbor improvement projects.
Sec. 2023. Protection of highways, bridge approaches, public works, and 
          nonprofit public services.
Sec. 2024. Modification of projects for improvement of the quality of 
          the environment.
Sec. 2025. Remediation of abandoned mine sites.
Sec. 2026. Leasing authority.
Sec. 2027. Fiscal transparency report.
Sec. 2028. Support of Army civil works program.
Sec. 2029. Sense of Congress on criteria for operation and maintenance 
          of harbor dredging projects.
Sec. 2030. Interagency and international support authority.
Sec. 2031. Water resources principles and guidelines.
Sec. 2032. Water resource priorities report.
Sec. 2033. Planning.
Sec. 2034. Independent peer review.
Sec. 2035. Safety assurance review.
Sec. 2036. Mitigation for fish and wildlife and wetlands losses.
Sec. 2037. Regional sediment management.
Sec. 2038. National shoreline erosion control development program.
Sec. 2039. Monitoring ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 2040. Electronic submission of permit applications.
Sec. 2041. Project administration.
Sec. 2042. Program administration.
Sec. 2043. Studies and reports for water resources projects.
Sec. 2044. Coordination and scheduling of Federal, State, and local 
          actions.
Sec. 2045. Project streamlining.
Sec. 2046. Project deauthorization.
Sec. 2047. Federal hopper dredges.

                  TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 3001. Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers, Alabama.
Sec. 3002. Cook Inlet, Alaska.
Sec. 3003. King Cove Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 3004. Seward Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 3005. Sitka, Alaska.
Sec. 3006. Tatitlek, Alaska.
Sec. 3007. Rio De Flag, Flagstaff, Arizona.
Sec. 3008. Nogales Wash and tributaries flood control project, Arizona.
Sec. 3009. Tucson drainage area, Arizona.
Sec. 3010. Osceola Harbor, Arkansas.
Sec. 3011. St. Francis River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.
Sec. 3012. Pine Mountain Dam, Arkansas.
Sec. 3013. Red-Ouachita River Basin Levees, Arkansas and Louisiana.
Sec. 3014. Cache Creek Basin, California.
Sec. 3015. CALFED stability program, California.
Sec. 3016. Compton Creek, California.
Sec. 3017. Grayson Creek/Murderer's Creek, California.
Sec. 3018. Hamilton Airfield, California.
Sec. 3019. John F. Baldwin Ship Channel and Stockton Ship Channel, 
          California.
Sec. 3020. Kaweah River, California.
Sec. 3021. Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, California.
Sec. 3022. Llagas Creek, California.
Sec. 3023. Magpie Creek, California.
Sec. 3024. Pacific Flyway Center, Sacramento, California.
Sec. 3025. Petaluma River, Petaluma, California.
Sec. 3026. Pinole Creek, California.
Sec. 3027. Prado Dam, California.
Sec. 3028. Redwood City Navigation Channel, California.
Sec. 3029. Sacramento and American Rivers flood control, California.
Sec. 3030. Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, California.
Sec. 3031. Sacramento River bank protection, California.
Sec. 3032. Salton Sea restoration, California.
Sec. 3033. Santa Ana River Mainstem, California.
Sec. 3034. Santa Barbara Streams, Lower Mission Creek, California.
Sec. 3035. Santa Cruz Harbor, California.
Sec. 3036. Seven Oaks Dam, California.
Sec. 3037. Upper Guadalupe River, California.
Sec. 3038. Walnut Creek Channel, California.
Sec. 3039. Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase I, California.
Sec. 3040. Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase II, California.
Sec. 3041. Yuba River Basin project, California.
Sec. 3042. South Platte River basin, Colorado.
Sec. 3043. Intracoastal Waterway, Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, 
          Delaware and Maryland.
Sec. 3044. St. George's Bridge, Delaware.
Sec. 3045. Brevard County, Florida.
Sec. 3046. Broward County and Hillsboro Inlet, Florida.
Sec. 3047. Canaveral Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 3048. Gasparilla and Estero Islands, Florida.
Sec. 3049. Lido Key Beach, Sarasota, Florida.
Sec. 3050. Peanut Island, Florida.
Sec. 3051. Port Sutton, Florida.
Sec. 3052. Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida.
Sec. 3053. Tampa Harbor Cut B, Florida.
Sec. 3054. Allatoona Lake, Georgia.
Sec. 3055. Latham River, Glynn County, Georgia.
Sec. 3056. Dworshak Reservoir improvements, Idaho.
Sec. 3057. Little Wood River, Gooding, Idaho.
Sec. 3058. Beardstown Community Boat Harbor, Beardstown, Illinois.
Sec. 3059. Cache River Levee, Illinois.
Sec. 3060. Chicago River, Illinois.
Sec. 3061. Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal dispersal barriers project, 
          Illinois.
Sec. 3062. Emiquon, Illinois.
Sec. 3063. Lasalle, Illinois.
Sec. 3064. Spunky Bottoms, Illinois.
Sec. 3065. Cedar Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 3066. Koontz Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 3067. White River, Indiana.
Sec. 3068. Des Moines River and Greenbelt, Iowa.
Sec. 3069. Perry Creek, Iowa.
Sec. 3070. Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
Sec. 3071. Hickman Bluff stabilization, Kentucky.
Sec. 3072. Mcalpine Lock and Dam, Kentucky and Indiana.
Sec. 3073. Prestonsburg, Kentucky.
Sec. 3074. Amite River and tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge 
          Parish Watershed.
Sec. 3075. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, Louisiana.
Sec. 3076. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, regional visitor center, 
          Louisiana.
Sec. 3077. Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, 
          Louisiana.
Sec. 3078. Bayou Plaquemine, Louisiana.
Sec. 3079. Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana.
Sec. 3080. Red River (J. Bennett Johnston) Waterway, Louisiana.
Sec. 3081. Mississippi Delta Region, Louisiana.
Sec. 3082. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet relocation assistance, 
          Louisiana.
Sec. 3083. Violet, Louisiana.
Sec. 3084. West bank of the Mississippi River (East of Harvey Canal), 
          Louisiana.
Sec. 3085. Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine.
Sec. 3086. Cumberland, Maryland.
Sec. 3087. Poplar Island, Maryland.
Sec. 3088. Detroit River shoreline, Detroit, Michigan.
Sec. 3089. St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan.
Sec. 3090. St. Joseph Harbor, Michigan.
Sec. 3091. Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan.
Sec. 3092. Ada, Minnesota.
Sec. 3093. Duluth Harbor, McQuade Road, Minnesota.
Sec. 3094. Grand Marais, Minnesota.
Sec. 3095. Grand Portage Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3096. Granite Falls, Minnesota.
Sec. 3097. Knife River Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3098. Red Lake River, Minnesota.
Sec. 3099. Silver Bay, Minnesota.
Sec. 3100. Taconite Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3101. Two Harbors, Minnesota.
Sec. 3102. Deer Island, Harrison County, Mississippi.
Sec. 3103. Jackson County, Mississippi.
Sec. 3104. Pearl River Basin, Mississippi.
Sec. 3105. Festus and Crystal City, Missouri.
Sec. 3106. L-15 levee, Missouri.
Sec. 3107. Monarch-Chesterfield, Missouri.
Sec. 3108. River Des Peres, Missouri.
Sec. 3109. Lower Yellowstone project, Montana.
Sec. 3110. Yellowstone River and tributaries, Montana and North Dakota.
Sec. 3111. Antelope Creek, Lincoln, Nebraska.
Sec. 3112. Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska.
Sec. 3113. Western Sarpy and Clear Creek, Nebraska.
Sec. 3114. Lower Truckee River, McCarran Ranch, Nevada.
Sec. 3115. Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey.
Sec. 3116. Passaic River basin flood management, New Jersey.
Sec. 3117. Cooperative agreements, New Mexico.
Sec. 3118. Middle Rio Grande restoration, New Mexico.
Sec. 3119. Buffalo Harbor, New York.
Sec. 3120. Long Island Sound oyster restoration, New York and 
          Connecticut.
Sec. 3121. Mamaroneck and Sheldrake Rivers watershed management, New 
          York.
Sec. 3122. Orchard Beach, Bronx, New York.
Sec. 3123. Port of New York and New Jersey, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 3124. New York State Canal System.
Sec. 3125. Susquehanna River and Upper Delaware River watershed 
          management, New York.
Sec. 3126. Missouri River restoration, North Dakota.
Sec. 3127. Wahpeton, North Dakota.
Sec. 3128. Ohio.
Sec. 3129. Lower Girard Lake Dam, Girard, Ohio.
Sec. 3130. Mahoning River, Ohio.
Sec. 3131. Arcadia Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3132. Arkansas River Corridor, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3133. Lake Eufaula, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3134. Oklahoma lakes demonstration program, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3135. Ottawa County, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3136. Red River chloride control, Oklahoma and Texas.
Sec. 3137. Waurika Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3138. Upper Willamette River watershed ecosystem restoration, 
          Oregon.
Sec. 3139. Delaware River, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware.
Sec. 3140. Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3141. Sheraden Park Stream and Chartiers Creek, Allegheny County, 
          Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3142. Solomon's Creek, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3143. South Central Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3144. Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 3145. Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island.
Sec. 3146. Missouri River Restoration, South Dakota.
Sec. 3147. Cedar Bayou, Texas.
Sec. 3148. Freeport Harbor, Texas.
Sec. 3149. Lake Kemp, Texas.
Sec. 3150. Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas.
Sec. 3151. North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas.
Sec. 3152. Pat Mayse Lake, Texas.
Sec. 3153. Proctor Lake, Texas.
Sec. 3154. San Antonio Channel, San Antonio, Texas.
Sec. 3155. Connecticut River restoration, Vermont.
Sec. 3156. Dam remediation, Vermont.
Sec. 3157. Lake Champlain Eurasian milfoil, water chestnut, and other 
          nonnative plant control, Vermont.
Sec. 3158. Upper Connecticut River Basin wetland restoration, Vermont 
          and New Hampshire.
Sec. 3159. Upper Connecticut River basin ecosystem restoration, Vermont 
          and New Hampshire.
Sec. 3160. Lake Champlain watershed, Vermont and New York.
Sec. 3161. Sandbridge Beach, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Sec. 3162. Tangier Island Seawall, Virginia.
Sec. 3163. Duwamish/Green, Washington.
Sec. 3164. McNary Lock and Dam, McNary National Wildlife Refuge, 
          Washington and Idaho.
Sec. 3165. Snake River project, Washington and Idaho.
Sec. 3166. Yakima River, Port of Sunnyside, Washington.
Sec. 3167. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 3168. Greenbrier River basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 3169. Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp, West Virginia.
Sec. 3170. Lower Mud River, Milton, West Virginia.
Sec. 3171. Mcdowell County, West Virginia.
Sec. 3172. Parkersburg, West Virginia.
Sec. 3173. Green Bay Harbor, Green Bay, Wisconsin.
Sec. 3174. Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin.
Sec. 3175. Mississippi River headwaters reservoirs.
Sec. 3176. Upper basin of Missouri River.
Sec. 3177. Upper Mississippi River System environmental management 
          program.
Sec. 3178. Upper Ohio River and Tributaries navigation system new 
          technology pilot program.
Sec. 3179. Continuation of project authorizations.
Sec. 3180. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 3181. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 3182. Land conveyances.
Sec. 3183. Extinguishment of reversionary interests and use 
          restrictions.

                            TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 4001. John Glenn Great Lakes Basin Program.
Sec. 4002. Lake Erie dredged material disposal sites.
Sec. 4003. Southwestern United States drought study.
Sec. 4004. Delaware River.
Sec. 4005. Eurasian milfoil.
Sec. 4006. Fire Island, Alaska.
Sec. 4007. Knik Arm, Cook Inlet, Alaska.
Sec. 4008. Kuskokwim River, Alaska.
Sec. 4009. Nome Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 4010. St. George Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 4011. Susitna River, Alaska.
Sec. 4012. Valdez, Alaska.
Sec. 4013. Gila Bend, Maricopa, Arizona.
Sec. 4014. Searcy County, Arkansas.
Sec. 4015. Aliso Creek, California.
Sec. 4016. Fresno, Kings, and Kern counties, California.
Sec. 4017. Fruitvale Avenue Railroad Bridge, Alameda, California.
Sec. 4018. Los Angeles River revitalization study, California.
Sec. 4019. Lytle Creek, Rialto, California.
Sec. 4020. Mokelumne River, San Joaquin County, California.
Sec. 4021. Orick, California.
Sec. 4022. Shoreline study, Oceanside, California.
Sec. 4023. Rialto, Fontana, and Colton, California.
Sec. 4024. Sacramento River, California.
Sec. 4025. San Diego County, California.
Sec. 4026. San Francisco Bay, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California.
Sec. 4027. South San Francisco Bay Shoreline, California.
Sec. 4028. Twentynine Palms, California.
Sec. 4029. Yucca Valley, California.
Sec. 4030. Selenium studies, Colorado.
Sec. 4031. Delaware and Christina Rivers and Shellpot Creek, Wilmington, 
          Delaware.
Sec. 4032. Delaware inland bays and tributaries and Atlantic coast, 
          Delaware.
Sec. 4033. Collier County Beaches, Florida.
Sec. 4034. Lower St. Johns River, Florida.
Sec. 4035. Herbert Hoover Dike supplemental major rehabilitation report, 
          Florida.
Sec. 4036. Vanderbilt Beach Lagoon, Florida.
Sec. 4037. Meriwether County, Georgia.
Sec. 4038. Boise River, Idaho.
Sec. 4039. Ballard's Island Side Channel, Illinois.
Sec. 4040. Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 4041. Salem, Indiana.
Sec. 4042. Buckhorn Lake, Kentucky.
Sec. 4043. Dewey Lake, Kentucky.
Sec. 4044. Louisville, Kentucky.
Sec. 4045. Vidalia Port, Louisiana.
Sec. 4046. Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.
Sec. 4047. Clinton River, Michigan.
Sec. 4048. Hamburg and Green Oak Townships, Michigan.
Sec. 4049. Lake Erie at Luna Pier, Michigan.
Sec. 4050. Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Sec. 4051. Northeast Mississippi.
Sec. 4052. Dredged material disposal, New Jersey.
Sec. 4053. Bayonne, New Jersey.
Sec. 4054. Carteret, New Jersey.
Sec. 4055. Gloucester County, New Jersey.
Sec. 4056. Perth Amboy, New Jersey.
Sec. 4057. Batavia, New York.
Sec. 4058. Big Sister Creek, Evans, New York.
Sec. 4059. Finger Lakes, New York.
Sec. 4060. Lake Erie Shoreline, Buffalo, New York.
Sec. 4061. Newtown Creek, New York.
Sec. 4062. Niagara River, New York.
Sec. 4063. Shore Parkway Greenway, Brooklyn, New York.
Sec. 4064. Upper Delaware River watershed, New York.
Sec. 4065. Lincoln County, North Carolina.
Sec. 4066. Wilkes County, North Carolina.
Sec. 4067. Yadkinville, North Carolina.
Sec. 4068. Flood damage reduction, Ohio.
Sec. 4069. Lake Erie, Ohio.
Sec. 4070. Ohio River, Ohio.
Sec. 4071. Toledo Harbor dredged material placement, Toledo, Ohio.
Sec. 4072. Toledo Harbor, Maumee River, and Lake Channel project, 
          Toledo, Ohio.
Sec. 4073. Ecosystem restoration and fish passage improvements, Oregon.
Sec. 4074. Walla Walla River basin, Oregon.
Sec. 4075. Chartiers Creek watershed, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4076. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4077. Western Pennsylvania flood damage reduction.
Sec. 4078. Williamsport, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4079. Yardley Borough, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 4080. Rio Valenciano, Juncos, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 4081. Woonsocket local protection project, Blackstone River basin, 
          Rhode Island.
Sec. 4082. Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, South Carolina.
Sec. 4083. Broad River, York County, South Carolina.
Sec. 4084. Savannah River, South Carolina and Georgia.
Sec. 4085. Chattanooga, Tennessee.
Sec. 4086. Cleveland, Tennessee.
Sec. 4087. Cumberland River, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sec. 4088. Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne Counties, Tennessee.
Sec. 4089. Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek, Memphis, Tennessee.
Sec. 4090. Abilene, Texas.
Sec. 4091. Coastal Texas ecosystem protection and restoration, Texas.
Sec. 4092. Port of Galveston, Texas.
Sec. 4093. Grand County and Moab, Utah.
Sec. 4094. Southwestern Utah.
Sec. 4095. Ecosystem and hydropower generation dams, Vermont.
Sec. 4096. Elliott Bay Seawall, Seattle, Washington.
Sec. 4097. Monongahela River Basin, Northern West Virginia.
Sec. 4098. Kenosha Harbor, Wisconsin.
Sec. 4099. Johnsonville Dam, Johnsonville, Wisconsin.
Sec. 4100. Wauwatosa, Wisconsin.
Sec. 4101. Debris removal.

                         TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS

Sec. 5001. Maintenance of navigation channels.
Sec. 5002. Watershed management.
Sec. 5003. Dam safety.
Sec. 5004. Structural integrity evaluations.
Sec. 5005. Flood mitigation priority areas.
Sec. 5006. Additional assistance for authorized projects.
Sec. 5007. Expedited completion of reports and construction for certain 
          projects.
Sec. 5008. Expedited completion of reports for certain projects.
Sec. 5009. Southeastern water resources assessment.
Sec. 5010. Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers enhancement project.
Sec. 5011. Great Lakes fishery and ecosystem restoration program.
Sec. 5012. Great Lakes remedial action plans and sediment remediation.
Sec. 5013. Great Lakes tributary models.
Sec. 5014. Great Lakes navigation and protection.
Sec. 5015. Saint Lawrence Seaway.
Sec. 5016. Upper Mississippi River dispersal barrier project.
Sec. 5017. Estuary restoration.
Sec. 5018. Missouri River and tributaries, mitigation, recovery, and 
          restoration, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North 
          Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming.
Sec. 5019. Susquehanna, Delaware, and Potomac River basins, Delaware, 
          Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.
Sec. 5020. Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and protection 
          program.
Sec. 5021. Chesapeake Bay oyster restoration, Virginia and Maryland.
Sec. 5022. Hypoxia assessment.
Sec. 5023. Potomac River watershed assessment and tributary strategy 
          evaluation and monitoring program.
Sec. 5024. Lock and dam security.
Sec. 5025. Research and development program for Columbia and Snake River 
          salmon survival.
Sec. 5026. Wage surveys.
Sec. 5027. Rehabilitation.
Sec. 5028. Auburn, Alabama.
Sec. 5029. Pinhook Creek, Huntsville, Alabama.
Sec. 5030. Alaska.
Sec. 5031. Barrow, Alaska.
Sec. 5032. Lowell Creek Tunnel, Seward, Alaska.
Sec. 5033. St. Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, Alaska.
Sec. 5034. Tanana River, Alaska.
Sec. 5035. Wrangell Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 5036. Augusta and Clarendon, Arkansas.
Sec. 5037. Des Arc levee protection, Arkansas.
Sec. 5038. Loomis Landing, Arkansas.
Sec. 5039. California.
Sec. 5040. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, 
          Stockton, California.
Sec. 5041. Cambria, California.
Sec. 5042. Contra Costa Canal, Oakley and Knightsen, California; Mallard 
          Slough, Pittsburg, California.
Sec. 5043. Dana Point Harbor, California.
Sec. 5044. East San Joaquin County, California.
Sec. 5045. Eastern Santa Clara basin, California.
Sec. 5046. LA-3 dredged material ocean disposal site designation, 
          California.
Sec. 5047. Lancaster, California.
Sec. 5048. Los Osos, California.
Sec. 5049. Pine Flat Dam fish and wildlife habitat, California.
Sec. 5050. Raymond Basin, Six Basins, Chino Basin, and San Gabriel 
          Basin, California.
Sec. 5051. San Francisco, California.
Sec. 5052. San Francisco, California, waterfront area.
Sec. 5053. San Pablo Bay, California, watershed and Suisun Marsh 
          ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 5054. St. Helena, California.
Sec. 5055. Upper Calaveras River, Stockton, California.
Sec. 5056. Rio Grande environmental management program, Colorado, New 
          Mexico, and Texas.
Sec. 5057. Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater, New Haven Harbor, 
          Connecticut.
Sec. 5058. Stamford, Connecticut.
Sec. 5059. Delmarva conservation corridor, Delaware, Maryland, and 
          Virginia.
Sec. 5060. Anacostia River, District of Columbia and Maryland.
Sec. 5061. East Central and Northeast Florida.
Sec. 5062. Florida Keys water quality improvements.
Sec. 5063. Lake Worth, Florida.
Sec. 5064. Big Creek, Georgia, watershed management and restoration 
          program.
Sec. 5065. Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District.
Sec. 5066. Savannah, Georgia.
Sec. 5067. Idaho, Montana, rural Nevada, New Mexico, rural Utah, and 
          Wyoming.
Sec. 5068. Riley Creek Recreation Area, Idaho.
Sec. 5069. Floodplain mapping, Little Calumet River, Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 5070. Reconstruction of Illinois and Missouri flood protection 
          projects.
Sec. 5071. Illinois River basin restoration.
Sec. 5072. Promontory Point third-party review, Chicago shoreline, 
          Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 5073. Kaskaskia River basin, Illinois, restoration.
Sec. 5074. Southwest Illinois.
Sec. 5075. Calumet region, Indiana.
Sec. 5076. Floodplain mapping, Missouri River, Iowa.
Sec. 5077. Paducah, Kentucky.
Sec. 5078. Southern and eastern Kentucky.
Sec. 5079. Winchester, Kentucky.
Sec. 5080. Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Sec. 5081. Calcasieu Ship Channel, Louisiana.
Sec. 5082. East Atchafalaya basin and Amite River basin region, 
          Louisiana.
Sec. 5083. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock project, Louisiana.
Sec. 5084. Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana.
Sec. 5085. Southeast Louisiana region, Louisiana.
Sec. 5086. West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 5087. Charlestown, Maryland.
Sec. 5088. St. Mary's River, Maryland.
Sec. 5089. Massachusetts dredged material disposal sites.
Sec. 5090. Ontonagon Harbor, Michigan.
Sec. 5091. Crookston, Minnesota.
Sec. 5092. Garrison and Kathio Township, Minnesota.
Sec. 5093. Itasca County, Minnesota.
Sec. 5094. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sec. 5095. Northeastern Minnesota.
Sec. 5096. Wild Rice River, Minnesota.
Sec. 5097. Mississippi.
Sec. 5098. Harrison, Hancock, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi.
Sec. 5099. Mississippi River, Missouri and Illinois.
Sec. 5100. St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 5101. St. Louis Regional Greenways, St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 5102. Missoula, Montana.
Sec. 5103. St. Mary project, Glacier County, Montana.
Sec. 5104. Lower Platte River watershed restoration, Nebraska.
Sec. 5105. Hackensack Meadowlands area, New Jersey.
Sec. 5106. Atlantic Coast of New York.
Sec. 5107. College Point, New York City, New York.
Sec. 5108. Flushing Bay and Creek, New York City, New York.
Sec. 5109. Hudson River, New York.
Sec. 5110. Mount Morris Dam, New York.
Sec. 5111. North Hempstead and Glen Cove North Shore watershed 
          restoration, New York.
Sec. 5112. Rochester, New York.
Sec. 5113. North Carolina.
Sec. 5114. Stanly County, North Carolina.
Sec. 5115. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina.
Sec. 5116. Cincinnati, Ohio.
Sec. 5117. Ohio River basin environmental management.
Sec. 5118. Toussaint River navigation project, Carroll Township, Ohio.
Sec. 5119. Statewide comprehensive water planning, Oklahoma.
Sec. 5120. Fern Ridge Dam, Oregon.
Sec. 5121. Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5122. Clinton County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5123. Kehly Run Dams, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5124. Lehigh River, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5125. Northeast Pennsylvania.
Sec. 5126. Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania and New York.
Sec. 5127. Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 5128. Lakes Marion and Moultrie, South Carolina.
Sec. 5129. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, and 
          terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration, South Dakota.
Sec. 5130. East Tennessee.
Sec. 5131. Fritz Landing, Tennessee.
Sec. 5132. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Tennessee.
Sec. 5133. Nashville, Tennessee.
Sec. 5134. Nonconnah Weir, Memphis, Tennessee.
Sec. 5135. Tennessee River partnership.
Sec. 5136. Town Creek, Lenoir City, Tennessee.
Sec. 5137. Upper Mississippi embayment, Tennessee, Arkansas, and 
          Mississippi.
Sec. 5138. Texas.
Sec. 5139. Bosque River watershed, Texas.
Sec. 5140. Dallas County region, Texas.
Sec. 5141. Dallas Floodway, Dallas, Texas.
Sec. 5142. Harris County, Texas.
Sec. 5143. Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas.
Sec. 5144. Onion Creek, Texas.
Sec. 5145. Connecticut River dams, Vermont.
Sec. 5146. Lake Champlain Canal, Vermont and New York.
Sec. 5147. Dyke Marsh, Fairfax County, Virginia.
Sec. 5148. Eastern Shore and Southwest Virginia.
Sec. 5149. James River, Virginia.
Sec. 5150. Baker Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington.
Sec. 5151. Hamilton Island campground, Washington.
Sec. 5152. Erosion control, Puget Island, Wahkiakum County, Washington.
Sec. 5153. Willapa Bay, Washington.
Sec. 5154. West Virginia and Pennsylvania flood control.
Sec. 5155. Central West Virginia.
Sec. 5156. Southern West Virginia.
Sec. 5157. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal 
          interests.
Sec. 5158. Additional assistance for critical projects.

                      TITLE VI--FLORIDA EVERGLADES

Sec. 6001. Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer, Florida.
Sec. 6002. Pilot projects.
Sec. 6003. Maximum costs.
Sec. 6004. Credit.
Sec. 6005. Outreach and assistance.
Sec. 6006. Critical restoration projects.
Sec. 6007. Regional engineering model for environmental restoration.

                    TITLE VII--LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA

Sec. 7001. Definitions.
Sec. 7002. Comprehensive plan.
Sec. 7003. Louisiana coastal area.
Sec. 7004. Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task 
          Force.
Sec. 7005. Project modifications.
Sec. 7006. Construction.
Sec. 7007. Non-Federal cost share.
Sec. 7008. Project justification.
Sec. 7009. Independent review.
Sec. 7010. Expedited reports.
Sec. 7011. Reporting.
Sec. 7012. New Orleans and vicinity.
Sec. 7013. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet.
Sec. 7014. Hurricane and storm damage reduction.
Sec. 7015. Larose to Golden Meadow.
Sec. 7016. Lower Jefferson Parish, Louisiana.

    TITLE VIII--UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATER-WAY SYSTEM

Sec. 8001. Definitions.
Sec. 8002. Navigation improvements and restoration.
Sec. 8003. Authorization of construction of navigation improvements.
Sec. 8004. Ecosystem restoration authorization.
Sec. 8005. Comparable progress.

                 TITLE IX--NATIONAL LEVEE SAFETY PROGRAM

Sec. 9001. Short title.
Sec. 9002. Definitions.
Sec. 9003. Committee on Levee Safety.
Sec. 9004. Inventory and inspection of levees.
Sec. 9005. Limitations on statutory construction.
Sec. 9006. Authorization of appropriations.
SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.
    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the 
Army.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 1001. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.
    Except as otherwise provided in this section, the following 
projects for water resources development and conservation and other 
purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary 
substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the 
conditions, described in the respective reports designated in this 
section:
        (1) Haines, alaska.--The project for navigation, Haines, 
    Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 20, 2004, 
    at a total cost of $14,040,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $11,232,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,808,000.
        (2) Port lions, alaska.--The project for navigation, Port 
    Lions, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 14, 
    2006, at a total cost of $9,530,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
    of $7,624,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,906,000.
        (3) Santa cruz river, paseo de las iglesias, arizona.--The 
    project for environmental restoration, Santa Cruz River, Pima 
    County, Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 28, 
    2006, at a total cost of $97,700,000, with an estimated Federal 
    cost of $63,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $34,400,000.
        (4) Tanque verde creek, pima county, arizona.--The project for 
    environmental restoration, Tanque Verde Creek, Pima County, 
    Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 22, 2003, at a 
    total cost of $5,906,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $3,836,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,070,000.
        (5) Salt river (rio salado oeste), maricopa county, arizona.--
    The project for environmental restoration, Salt River (Rio Salado 
    Oeste), Maricopa County, Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
    dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of $166,650,000, with an 
    estimated Federal cost of $106,629,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $60,021,000.
        (6) Salt river (va shly'ay akimel), maricopa county, arizona.--
            (A) In general.--The project for environmental restoration, 
        Salt River (Va Shly'ay Akimel), Arizona: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated January 3, 2005, at a total cost of 
        $162,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $105,200,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $56,900,000.
            (B) Coordination with federal reclamation projects.--The 
        Secretary, to the maximum extent practicable, shall coordinate 
        the design and construction of the project described in 
        subparagraph (A) with the Bureau of Reclamation and any 
        operating agent for any Federal reclamation project in the Salt 
        River Basin to avoid impacts to existing Federal reclamation 
        facilities and operations in the Salt River Basin.
        (7) May branch, fort smith, arkansas.--The project for flood 
    damage reduction, May Branch, Fort Smith, Arkansas: Report of the 
    Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of 
    $30,850,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $15,010,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $15,840,000.
        (8) Hamilton city, glenn county, california.--The project for 
    flood damage reduction and environmental restoration, Hamilton 
    City, Glenn County, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
    dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost of $52,400,000, with an 
    estimated Federal cost of $34,100,000 and estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $18,300,000.
        (9) Silver strand shoreline, imperial beach, california.--The 
    project for storm damage reduction, Silver Strand Shoreline, 
    Imperial Beach, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
    December 30, 2003, at a total cost of $13,700,000, with an 
    estimated Federal cost of $8,521,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $5,179,000, and at an estimated total cost of $42,500,000 
    for periodic beach nourishment over the 50-year life of the 
    project, with an estimated Federal cost of $21,250,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $21,250,000.
        (10) Matilija dam, ventura county, california.--The project for 
    environmental restoration, Matilija Dam, Ventura County, 
    California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 20, 
    2004, at a total cost of $144,500,000, with an estimated Federal 
    cost of $89,700,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $54,800,000.
        (11) Middle creek, lake county, california.--The project for 
    flood damage reduction and environmental restoration, Middle Creek, 
    Lake County, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
    November 29, 2004, at a total cost of $45,200,000, with an 
    estimated Federal cost of $29,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $15,700,000.
        (12) Napa river salt marsh restoration, california.--
            (A) In general.--The project for environmental restoration, 
        Napa River Salt Marsh Restoration, Napa, California: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost 
        of $134,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $87,500,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $47,000,000.
            (B) Administration.--In carrying out the project authorized 
        by this paragraph, the Secretary shall--
                (i) construct a recycled water pipeline extending from 
            the Sonoma Valley County Sanitation District Waste Water 
            Treatment Plant and the Napa Sanitation District Waste 
            Water Treatment Plant to the project; and
                (ii) restore or enhance Salt Ponds 1, 1A, 2, and 3.
        (13) Denver county reach, south platte river, denver, 
    colorado.--The project for environmental restoration, Denver County 
    Reach, South Platte River, Denver, Colorado: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers dated May 16, 2003, at a total cost of $20,100,000, with 
    an estimated Federal cost of $13,065,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $7,035,000.
        (14) Central and southern florida, indian river lagoon, 
    florida.--
            (A) In general.--The Secretary may carry out the project 
        for ecosystem restoration, water supply, flood control, and 
        protection of water quality, Central and Southern Florida, 
        Indian River Lagoon, Florida, at a total cost of 
        $1,365,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $682,500,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $682,500,000, in 
        accordance with section 601 of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680) and the recommendations of the 
        report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 6, 2004.
            (B) Deauthorizations.--The following projects are not 
        authorized after the date of enactment of this Act:
                (i) The uncompleted portions of the project for the C-
            44 Basin Storage Reservoir of the Comprehensive Everglades 
            Restoration Plan, authorized by section 601(b)(2)(C)(i) of 
            the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
            2682), at a total cost of $147,800,000, with an estimated 
            Federal cost of $73,900,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
            cost of $73,900,000.
                (ii) The uncompleted portions of the Martin County, 
            Florida, modifications to the project for Central and 
            Southern Florida, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
            Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 740), at a total cost of 
            $15,471,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $8,073,000 
            and an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,398,000.
                (iii) The uncompleted portions of the East Coast 
            Backpumping, St. Lucie-Martin County, Spillway Structure S-
            311 modifications to the project for Central and Southern 
            Florida, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act 
            of 1968 (82 Stat. 740), at a total cost of $77,118,000, 
            with an estimated Federal cost of $55,124,000 and an 
            estimated non-Federal cost of $21,994,000.
        (15) Comprehensive everglades restoration plan, central and 
    southern florida, picayune strand restoration project, collier 
    county, florida.--The project for ecosystem restoration, 
    Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, Central and Southern 
    Florida, Picayune Strand Restoration Project, Collier County, 
    Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated September 15, 2005, 
    at a total cost of $375,330,000 with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $187,665,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $187,665,000.
        (16) Comprehensive everglades restoration plan, central and 
    southern florida, site 1 impoundment project, palm beach county, 
    florida.--The project for ecosystem restoration, Comprehensive 
    Everglades Restoration Plan, Central and Southern Florida, Site 1 
    Impoundment Project, Palm Beach County, Florida: Report of the 
    Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of 
    $80,840,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $40,420,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $40,420,000.
        (17) Miami harbor, miami-dade county, florida.--
            (A) In general.--The project for navigation, Miami Harbor, 
        Miami-Dade County, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated April 25, 2005, at a total cost of $125,270,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $75,140,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $50,130,000.
            (B) General reevaluation report.--The non-Federal share of 
        the cost of the general reevaluation report that resulted in 
        the report of the Chief of Engineers referred to in 
        subparagraph (A) shall be the same percentage as the non-
        Federal share of cost of construction of the project.
            (C) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into a new 
        partnership with the non-Federal interest to reflect the cost 
        sharing required by subparagraph (B).
        (18) East st. louis and vicinity, illinois.--The project for 
    environmental restoration and recreation, East St. Louis and 
    Vicinity, Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 
    22, 2004, at a total cost of $208,260,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $134,910,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $73,350,000.
        (19) Peoria riverfront development, illinois.--The project for 
    environmental restoration, Peoria Riverfront Development, Illinois: 
    Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 28, 2003, at a total 
    cost of $18,220,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,840,000 
    and an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,380,000.
        (20) Wood river levee system reconstruction, madison county, 
    illinois.--The project for flood damage reduction, Wood River Levee 
    System Reconstruction, Madison County, Illinois: Report of the 
    Chief of Engineers dated July 18, 2006, at a total cost of 
    $17,220,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,193,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $6,027,000.
        (21) Des moines and raccoon rivers, des moines, iowa.--The 
    project for flood damage reduction, Des Moines and Raccoon Rivers, 
    Des Moines, Iowa: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 28, 
    2006, at a total cost of $10,780,000, with an estimated Federal 
    cost of $6,967,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,813,000.
        (22) Licking river basin, cynthiana, kentucky.--The project for 
    flood damage reduction, Licking River Basin, Cynthiana, Kentucky: 
    Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 24, 2006, at a total 
    cost of $18,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,830,000 
    and an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,370,000.
        (23) Bayou sorrel lock, louisiana.--The project for navigation, 
    Bayou Sorrel Lock, Louisiana: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
    dated January 3, 2005, at a total cost of $9,600,000. The costs of 
    construction of the project are to be paid \1/2\ from amounts 
    appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ from 
    amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
        (24) Morganza to the gulf of mexico, louisiana.--
            (A) In general.--The project for hurricane and storm damage 
        reduction, Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana: Reports 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated August 23, 2002, and July 22, 
        2003, at a total cost of $886,700,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $576,355,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $310,345,000.
            (B) Operation and maintenance.--The operation, maintenance, 
        repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of the Houma Navigation 
        Canal lock complex and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway floodgate 
        features of the project described in subparagraph (A) that 
        provide for inland waterway transportation shall be a Federal 
        responsibility in accordance with section 102 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2212).
        (25) Port of iberia, louisiana.--The project for navigation, 
    Port of Iberia, Louisiana: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
    December 31, 2006, at a total cost of $131,250,000, with an 
    estimated Federal cost of $105,315,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $25,935,000; except that the Secretary, in consultation 
    with Vermillion and Iberia Parishes, Louisiana, and consistent with 
    the mitigation plan in the report, shall use available dredged 
    material and rock placement on the south bank of the Gulf 
    Intracoastal Waterway and the west bank of the Freshwater Bayou 
    Channel to provide incidental storm surge protection that does not 
    adversely affect the mitigation plan.
        (26) Smith island, somerset county, maryland.--The project for 
    environmental restoration, Smith Island, Somerset County, Maryland: 
    Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 29, 2001, at a total 
    cost of $15,580,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $10,127,000 
    and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,453,000.
        (27) Roseau river, roseau, minnesota.--The project for flood 
    damage reduction, Roseau River, Roseau, Minnesota: Report of the 
    Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost of 
    $25,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,820,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $11,280,000.
        (28) Argentine, east bottoms, fairfax-jersey creek, and north 
    kansas levees units, missouri river and tributaries at kansas 
    cities, missouri and kansas.--The project for flood damage 
    reduction, Argentine, East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey Creek, and North 
    Kansas Levees units, Missouri River and tributaries at Kansas 
    Cities, Missouri and Kansas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
    December 19, 2006, at a total cost of $65,430,000, with an 
    estimated Federal cost of $42,530,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $22,900,000.
        (29) Swope park industrial area, blue river, kansas city, 
    missouri.--The project for flood damage reduction, Swope Park 
    Industrial Area, Blue River, Kansas City, Missouri: Report of the 
    Chief of Engineers dated December 30, 2003, at a total cost of 
    $16,980,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,037,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $5,943,000.
        (30) Great egg harbor inlet to townsends inlet, new jersey.--
    The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Great Egg 
    Harbor Inlet to Townsends Inlet, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers dated October 24, 2006, at a total cost of $54,360,000, 
    with an estimated Federal cost of $35,069,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $19,291,000, and at an estimated total cost of 
    $202,500,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the 
    project, with an estimated Federal cost of $101,250,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $101,250,000.
        (31) Hudson raritan estuary, liberty state park, new jersey.--
            (A) In general.--The project for environmental restoration, 
        Hudson Raritan Estuary, Liberty State Park, New Jersey: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated August 25, 2006, at a total 
        cost of $34,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $22,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,900,000.
            (B) Restoration teams.--In carrying out the project, the 
        Secretary shall establish and utilize watershed restoration 
        teams composed of estuary restoration experts from the Corps of 
        Engineers, the New Jersey department of environmental 
        protection, and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey 
        and other experts designated by the Secretary for the purpose 
        of developing habitat restoration and water quality 
        enhancement.
        (32) New jersey shore protection study, manasquan inlet to 
    barnegat inlet, new jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm 
    damage reduction, New Jersey Shore Protection Study, Manasquan 
    Inlet to Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers dated December 30, 2003, at a total cost of $71,900,000, 
    with an estimated Federal cost of $46,735,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $25,165,000, and at an estimated total cost of 
    $119,680,000 for periodic beach nourishment over the 50-year life 
    of the project, with an estimated Federal cost of $59,840,000 and 
    an estimated non-Federal cost of $59,840,000.
        (33) Raritan bay and sandy hook bay, union beach, new jersey.--
    The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Raritan Bay 
    and Sandy Hook Bay, Union Beach, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers dated January 4, 2006, at a total cost of $115,000,000, 
    with an estimated Federal cost of $74,800,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $40,200,000, and at an estimated total cost of 
    $6,500,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the 
    project, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,250,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $3,250,000.
        (34) South river, raritan river basin, new jersey.--The project 
    for hurricane and storm damage reduction and environmental 
    restoration, South River, Raritan River Basin, New Jersey: Report 
    of the Chief of Engineers dated July 22, 2003, at a total cost of 
    $122,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $79,500,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $42,800,000.
        (35) Southwest valley, bernalillo county, new mexico.--The 
    project for flood damage reduction, Southwest Valley, Bernalillo 
    County, New Mexico: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated November 
    29, 2004, at a total cost of $24,840,000, with an estimated Federal 
    cost of $16,150,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $8,690,000.
        (36) Montauk point, new york.--The project for hurricane and 
    storm damage reduction, Montauk Point, New York: Report of the 
    Chief of Engineers dated March 31, 2006, at a total cost of 
    $14,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,300,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $7,300,000.
        (37) Hocking river basin, monday creek, ohio.--
            (A) In general.--The project for ecosystem restoration, 
        Hocking River Basin, Monday Creek, Ohio: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated August 24, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $20,980,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,440,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,540,000.
            (B) Wayne national forest.--
                (i) In general.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
            Secretary of Agriculture, may construct other project 
            features on property that is located in the Wayne National 
            Forest, Ohio, owned by the United States and managed by the 
            Forest Service as described in the report of the Corps of 
            Engineers entitled ``Hocking River Basin, Ohio, Monday 
            Creek Sub-Basin Ecosystem Restoration Project Feasibility 
            Report and Environmental Assessment''.
                (ii) Cost.--Each project feature carried out on Federal 
            land shall be designed, constructed, operated, and 
            maintained at Federal expense.
                (iii) Authorization of appropriations.--There is 
            authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of 
            Agriculture to carry out this subparagraph $1,270,000.
        (38) Town of bloomsburg, columbia county, pennsylvania.--The 
    project for flood damage reduction, town of Bloomsburg, Columbia 
    County, Pennsylvania: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
    January 25, 2006, at a total cost of $44,500,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $28,925,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $15,575,000.
        (39) Pawleys island, south carolina.--The project for hurricane 
    and storm damage reduction, Pawleys Island, South Carolina: Report 
    of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost 
    of $8,980,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,840,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $3,140,000, and at an estimated total 
    cost of $21,200,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life 
    of the project, with an estimated Federal cost of $10,600,000 and 
    an estimated non-Federal cost of $10,600,000.
        (40) Corpus christi ship channel, corpus christi, texas.--
            (A) In general.--The project for navigation and ecosystem 
        restoration, Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated June 2, 2003, at a total cost of 
        $188,110,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $87,810,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $100,300,000.
            (B) Navigational servitude.--In carrying out the project 
        under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall enforce the 
        navigational servitude in the Corpus Christi Ship Channel 
        (including the removal or relocation of any facility 
        obstructing the project) consistent with the cost sharing 
        requirements of section 101 of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211).
        (41) Gulf intracoastal waterway, brazos river to port o'connor, 
    matagorda bay re-route, texas.--The project for navigation, Gulf 
    Intracoastal Waterway, Brazos River to Port O'Connor, Matagorda Bay 
    Re-Route, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 
    24, 2002, at a total cost of $17,280,000. The costs of construction 
    of the project are to be paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from 
    the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts 
    appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
        (42) Gulf intracoastal waterway, high island to brazos river, 
    texas.--The project for navigation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, 
    High Island to Brazos River, Texas: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers dated April 16, 2004, at a total cost of $14,450,000. The 
    costs of construction of the project are to be paid \1/2\ from 
    amounts appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and \1/
    2\ from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
        (43) Lower colorado river basin phase i, texas.--The project 
    for flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, Lower 
    Colorado River Basin Phase I, Texas: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers dated December 31, 2006, at a total cost of $110,730,000, 
    with an estimated Federal cost of $69,640,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $41,090,000.
        (44) Atlantic intracoastal waterway bridge replacement, deep 
    creek, chesapeake, virginia.--The project for Atlantic Intracoastal 
    Waterway Bridge Replacement, Deep Creek, Chesapeake, Virginia: 
    Report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 3, 2003, at a total 
    cost of $37,200,000.
        (45) Craney island eastward expansion, norfolk harbor and 
    channels, hampton roads, virginia.--
            (A) In general.--The project for navigation, Craney Island 
        Eastward Expansion, Norfolk Harbor and Channels, Hampton Roads, 
        Virginia: Report of Chief of Engineers dated October 24, 2006, 
        at a total cost of $712,103,000.
            (B) Non-federal share.--Notwithstanding sections 101 and 
        103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        2211 and 2213), the Federal share of the cost of the project 
        shall be 50 percent.
        (46) Centralia, chehalis river, lewis county, washington.--
            (A) In general.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
        Centralia, Chehalis River, Lewis County, Washington: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated September 27, 2004, at a total 
        cost of $123,770,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $74,740,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $49,030,000.
            (B) Credit.--The Secretary shall--
                (i) credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
            Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-
            Federal share of the cost of the project up to $6,500,000 
            for the cost of planning and design work carried out by the 
            non-Federal interest in accordance with the project study 
            plan dated November 28, 1999; and
                (ii) credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of 
            the project the cost of design and construction work 
            carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of 
            the partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary 
            determines that the work is integral to the project.
SEC. 1002. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of 
the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project 
is feasible, may carry out the project under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s):
        (1) Haleyville, alabama.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
    Haleyville, Alabama.
        (2) Weiss lake, alabama.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
    Weiss Lake, Alabama.
        (3) Fort yukon, alaska.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
    Fort Yukon, Alaska.
        (4) Little colorado river levee, arizona.--Project for flood 
    damage reduction, Little Colorado River Levee, Arizona.
        (5) Cache river basin, grubbs, arkansas.--Project for flood 
    damage reduction, Cache River Basin, Grubbs, Arkansas.
        (6) Barrel springs wash, palmdale, california.--Project for 
    flood damage reduction, Barrel Springs Wash, Palmdale, California.
        (7) Borrego springs, california.--Project for flood damage 
    reduction, Borrego Springs, California.
        (8) Colton, california.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
    Colton, California.
        (9) Dunlap stream, yucaipa, california.--Project for flood 
    damage reduction, Dunlap Stream, Yucaipa, California.
        (10) Hunts canyon wash, palmdale, california.--Project for 
    flood damage reduction, Hunts Canyon Wash, Palmdale, California.
        (11) Ontario and chino, california.--Project for flood damage 
    reduction, Ontario and Chino, California.
        (12) Santa venetia, california.--Project for flood damage 
    reduction, Santa Venetia, California.
        (13) Whittier, california.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
    Whittier, California.
        (14) Wildwood creek, yucaipa, california.--Project for flood 
    damage reduction, Wildwood Creek, Yucaipa, California.
        (15) Bibb county and city of macon levee, georgia.--Project for 
    flood damage reduction, Bibb County and City of Macon Levee, 
    Georgia.
        (16) Fort wayne and vicinity, indiana.--Project for flood 
    damage reduction, St. Mary's and Maumee Rivers, Fort Wayne and 
    vicinity, Indiana.
        (17) St. francisville, lousiana.--Project for flood damage 
    reduction, St. Francisville, Louisiana.
        (18) Salem, massachusetts.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
    Salem, Massachusetts.
        (19) Cass river, michigan.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
    Cass River, Vassar and vicinity, Michigan.
        (20) Crow river, rockford, minnesota.--Project for flood damage 
    reduction, Crow River, Rockford, Minnesota.
        (21) Marsh creek, minnesota.--Project for flood damage 
    reduction, Marsh Creek, Minnesota.
        (22) South branch of the wild rice river, borup, minnesota.--
    Project for flood damage reduction, South Branch of the Wild Rice 
    River, Borup, Minnesota.
        (23) Blacksnake creek, st. joseph, missouri.--Project for flood 
    damage reduction, Blacksnake Creek, St. Joseph, Missouri.
        (24) Acid brook, pompton lakes, new jersey.--Project for flood 
    damage reduction, Acid Brook, Pompton Lakes, New Jersey.
        (25) Canisteo river, addison, new york.--Project for flood 
    damage reduction, Canisteo River, Addison, New York.
        (26) Cohocton river, campbell, new york.--Project for flood 
    damage reduction, Cohocton River, Campbell, New York.
        (27) Dry and otter creeks, cortland, new york.--Project for 
    flood damage reduction, Dry and Otter Creeks, Cortland, New York.
        (28) East river, silver beach, new york city, new york.--
    Project for flood damage reduction, East River, Silver Beach, New 
    York City, New York.
        (29) East valley creek, andover, new york.--Project for flood 
    damage reduction, East Valley Creek, Andover, New York.
        (30) Sunnyside brook, westchester county, new york.--Project 
    for flood damage reduction, Sunnyside Brook, Westchester County, 
    New York.
        (31) Little yankee and mud run, trumbull county, ohio.--Project 
    for flood damage reduction, Little Yankee and Mud Run, Trumbull 
    County, Ohio.
        (32) Little neshaminy creek, warrington, pennsylvania.--Project 
    for flood damage reduction, Little Neshaminy Creek, Warrington, 
    Pennsylvania.
        (33) Southampton creek watershed, southampton, pennsylvania.--
    Project for flood damage reduction, Southampton Creek watershed, 
    Southampton, Pennsylvania.
        (34) Spring creek, lower macungie township, pennsylvania.--
    Project for flood damage reduction, Spring Creek, Lower Macungie 
    Township, Pennsylvania.
        (35) Yardley aqueduct, silver and brock creeks, yardley, 
    pennsylvania.--Project for flood damage reduction, Yardley 
    Aqueduct, Silver and Brock Creeks, Yardley, Pennsylvania.
        (36) Surfside beach, south carolina.--Project for flood damage 
    reduction, Surfside Beach and vicinity, South Carolina.
        (37) Sandy creek, jackson county, tennessee.--A project for 
    flood damage reduction, Sandy Creek, Jackson County, Tennessee.
        (38) Congelosi ditch, missouri city, texas.--Project for flood 
    damage reduction, Congelosi Ditch, Missouri City, Texas.
        (39) Dilley, texas.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
    Dilley, Texas.
        (40) Cheyenne, wyoming.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
    Cheyenne, Wyoming.
    (b) Special Rules.--
        (1) Cache river basin, grubbs, arkansas.--The Secretary may 
    proceed with the project for the Cache River Basin, Grubbs, 
    Arkansas, referred to in subsection (a)(5), notwithstanding that 
    the project is located within the boundaries of the flood control 
    project, Cache River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri, authorized by 
    section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950, (64 Stat. 172) and 
    modified by section 99 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
    1974 (88 Stat. 41).
        (2) Ontario and chino, california.--The Secretary shall carry 
    out the project for flood damage reduction, Ontario and Chino, 
    California, referred to in subsection (a)(11) if the Secretary 
    determines that the project is feasible.
        (3) Santa venetia, california.--The Secretary shall carry out 
    the project for flood damage reduction, Santa Venetia, California, 
    referred to in subsection (a)(12) if the Secretary determines that 
    the project is feasible and shall allow the non-Federal interest to 
    participate in the financing of the project in accordance with 
    section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
    Stat. 4184) to the extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates 
    that applying such section is necessary to implement the project.
        (4) Whittier, california.--The Secretary shall carry out the 
    project for flood damage reduction, Whittier, California, referred 
    to in subsection (a)(13) if the Secretary determines that the 
    project is feasible.
        (5) Wildwood creek, yucaipa, california.--The Secretary shall 
    review the locally prepared plan for the project for flood damage, 
    Wildwood Creek, California, referred to in subsection (a)(14) and, 
    if the Secretary determines that the plan meets the evaluation and 
    design standards of the Corps of Engineers and that the plan is 
    feasible, the Secretary may use the plan to carry out the project 
    and shall provide credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
    of the project for the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
    interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
    project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to 
    the project.
        (6) Fort wayne and vicinity, indiana.--In carrying out the 
    project for flood damage reduction, St. Mary's and Maumee Rivers, 
    Fort Wayne and vicinity, Indiana, referred to in subsection (a)(16) 
    the Secretary shall--
            (A) provide a 100-year level of flood protection at the 
        Berry Thieme, Park-Thompson, Woodhurst, and Tillman sites along 
        the St. Mary's River; and
            (B) allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
        financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to 
        the extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that 
        applying such section is necessary to implement the project.
        (7) South branch of the wild rice river, borup, minnesota.--In 
    carrying out the project for flood damage reduction, South Branch 
    of the Wild Rice River, Borup, Minnesota, referred to in subsection 
    (a)(22) the Secretary may consider national ecosystem restoration 
    benefits in determining the Federal interest in the project and 
    shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
    financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the 
    Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the 
    extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such 
    section is necessary to implement the project.
        (8) Acid brook, pompton lakes, new jersey.--The Secretary shall 
    carry out the project for flood damage reduction, Acid Brook, 
    Pompton Lakes, New Jersey, referred to in subsection (a)(24) if the 
    Secretary determines that the project is feasible.
        (9) Sandy creek, tennessee.--Consistent with the report of the 
    Chief of Engineers dated March 24, 1948, on the West Tennessee 
    Tributaries project, in carrying out the project for flood damage 
    reduction, Sandy Creek, Tennessee, referred to in section (a)(37)--
            (A) Sandy Creek shall not be considered to be an authorized 
        channel of the West Tennessee Tributaries project; and
            (B) the project shall not be considered to be part of the 
        West Tennessee Tributaries project.
        (10) Dilley, texas.--The Secretary shall carry out the project 
    for flood damage reduction, Dilley, Texas, referred to in 
    subsection (a)(39) if the Secretary determines that the project is 
    feasible.
SEC. 1003. SMALL PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 
1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r):
        (1) Aliso creek, california.--Projects for emergency streambank 
    protection, Aliso Creek, California.
        (2) St. johns bluff training wall, duval county, florida.--
    Project for emergency streambank protection, St. Johns Bluff 
    Training Wall, Duval County, Florida.
        (3) Gulf intracoastal waterway, iberville parish, louisiana.--
    Projects for emergency streambank protection, Gulf Intracoastal 
    Waterway, Iberville Parish, Louisiana.
        (4) Ouachita and black rivers, arkansas and louisiana.--
    Projects for emergency streambank protection, Ouachita and Black 
    Rivers, Arkansas and Louisiana.
        (5) Piney point lighthouse, st. mary's county, maryland.--
    Project for emergency streambank protection, Piney Point 
    Lighthouse, St. Mary's County, Maryland.
        (6) Pug hole lake, minnesota.--Project for emergency streambank 
    protection, Pug Hole Lake, Minnesota.
        (7) Middle fork grand river, gentry county, missouri.--Project 
    for emergency streambank protection, Middle Fork Grand River, 
    Gentry County, Missouri.
        (8) Platte river, platte city, missouri.--Project for emergency 
    streambank protection, Platte River, Platte City, Missouri.
        (9) Rush creek, parkville, missouri.--Project for emergency 
    streambank protection, Rush Creek, Parkville, Missouri, including 
    measures to address degradation of the creek bed.
        (10) Dry and otter creeks, cortland county, new york.--Project 
    for emergency streambank protection, Dry and Otter Creeks, Cortland 
    County, New York.
        (11) Keuka lake, hammondsport, new york.--Project for emergency 
    streambank protection, Keuka Lake, Hammondsport, New York.
        (12) Kowawese unique area and hudson river, new windsor, new 
    york.--Project for emergency streambank protection, Kowawese Unique 
    Area and Hudson River, New Windsor, New York.
        (13) Owego creek, tioga county, new york.--Project for 
    emergency streambank protection, Owego Creek, Tioga County, New 
    York.
        (14) Howard road outfall, shelby county, tennessee.--Project 
    for emergency streambank protection, Howard Road outfall, Shelby 
    County, Tennessee.
        (15) Mitch farm ditch and lateral d, shelby county, 
    tennessee.--Project for emergency streambank protection, Mitch Farm 
    Ditch and Lateral D, Shelby County, Tennessee.
        (16) Wolf river tributaries, shelby county, tennessee.--Project 
    for emergency streambank protection, Wolf River tributaries, Shelby 
    County, Tennessee.
        (17) Johnson creek, arlington, texas.--Project for emergency 
    streambank protection, Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas.
        (18) Wells river, newbury, vermont.--Project for emergency 
    streambank protection, Wells River, Newbury, Vermont.
SEC. 1004. SMALL PROJECTS FOR NAVIGATION.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of 
the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project 
is feasible, may carry out the project under section 107 of the River 
and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
        (1) Barrow harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, Barrow 
    Harbor, Alaska.
        (2) Coffman cove, alaska.--Project for navigation, Coffman 
    Cove, Alaska.
        (3) Kotzebue harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, Kotzebue 
    Harbor, Alaska.
        (4) Nome harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, Nome Harbor, 
    Alaska.
        (5) Old harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, Old Harbor, 
    Alaska.
        (6) Little rock port, arkansas.--Project for navigation, Little 
    Rock Port, Arkansas River, Arkansas.
        (7) Mississippi river ship channel, louisiana.--Project for 
    navigation, Mississippi River Ship Channel, Louisiana.
        (8) East basin, cape cod canal, sandwich, massachusetts.--
    Project for navigation, East Basin, Cape Cod Canal, Sandwich, 
    Massachusetts.
        (9) Lynn harbor, lynn, massachusetts.--Project for navigation, 
    Lynn Harbor, Lynn, Massachusetts.
        (10) Merrimack river, haverhill, massachusetts.--Project for 
    navigation, Merrimack River, Haverhill, Massachusetts.
        (11) Oak bluffs harbor, oak bluffs, massachusetts.--Project for 
    navigation, Oak Bluffs Harbor, Oak Bluffs, Massachusetts.
        (12) Woods hole great harbor, falmouth, massachusetts.--Project 
    for navigation, Woods Hole Great Harbor, Falmouth, Massachusetts.
        (13) Au sable river, michigan.--Project for navigation, Au 
    Sable River in the vicinity of Oscoda, Michigan.
        (14) Clinton river, michigan.--Project for navigation, Clinton 
    River, Michigan.
        (15) Ontonagon river, michigan.--Project for navigation, 
    Ontonagon River, Ontonagon, Michigan.
        (16) Outer channel and inner harbor, menominee harbor, michigan 
    and wisconsin.--Project for navigation, Outer Channel and Inner 
    Harbor, Menominee Harbor, Michigan and Wisconsin.
        (17) Sebewaing river, michigan.--Project for navigation, 
    Sebewaing River, Michigan.
        (18) Traverse city harbor, traverse city, michigan.--Project 
    for navigation, Traverse City Harbor, Traverse City, Michigan.
        (19) Tower harbor, tower, minnesota.--Project for navigation, 
    Tower Harbor, Tower, Minnesota.
        (20) Olcott harbor, olcott, new york.--Project for navigation, 
    Olcott Harbor, Olcott, New York.
        (21) Milwaukee harbor, wisconsin.--Project for navigation, 
    Milwaukee Harbor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
    (b) Special Rules.--
        (1) Traverse city harbor, traverse city, michigan.--The 
    Secretary shall review the locally prepared plan for the project 
    for navigation, Traverse City Harbor, Michigan, referred to in 
    subsection (a)(18), and, if the Secretary determines that the plan 
    meets the evaluation and design standards of the Corps of Engineers 
    and that the plan is feasible, the Secretary may use the plan to 
    carry out the project and shall provide credit toward the non-
    Federal share of the cost of the project for the cost of work 
    carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
    partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary determines 
    that the work is integral to the project.
        (2) Tower harbor, tower minnesota.--The Secretary shall carry 
    out the project for navigation, Tower Harbor, Tower, Minnesota, 
    referred to in subsection (a)(19) if the Secretary determines that 
    the project is feasible.
SEC. 1005. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE 
ENVIRONMENT.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
appropriate, may carry out the project under section 1135 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a):
        (1) Ballona creek, los angeles county, california.--Project for 
    improvement of the quality of the environment, Ballona Creek, Los 
    Angeles County, California.
        (2) Ballona lagoon tide gates, marina del rey, california.--
    Project for improvement of the quality of the environment, Ballona 
    Lagoon Tide Gates, Marina Del Rey, California.
        (3) Ft. george inlet, duval county, florida.--Project for 
    improvement of the quality of the environment, Ft. George Inlet, 
    Duval County, Florida.
        (4) Rathbun lake, iowa.--Project for improvement of the quality 
    of the environment, Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
        (5) Smithville lake, missouri.--Project for improvement of the 
    quality of the environment, Smithville Lake, Missouri.
        (6) Delaware bay, new jersey and delaware.--Project for 
    improvement of the quality of the environment, Delaware Bay, New 
    Jersey and Delaware, for the purpose of oyster restoration.
        (7) Tioga-hammond lakes, pennsylvania.--Project for improvement 
    of the quality of the environment, Tioga-Hammond Lakes, 
    Pennsylvania.
SEC. 1006. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of 
the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project 
is appropriate, may carry out the project under section 206 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330):
        (1) Cypress creek, montgomery, alabama.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, Cypress Creek, Montgomery, Alabama.
        (2) Black lake, alaska.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
    restoration, Black Lake, Alaska, at the head of the Chignik 
    watershed.
        (3) Ben lomond dam, santa cruz, california.--Project for 
    aquatic ecosystem restoration, Ben Lomond Dam, Santa Cruz, 
    California.
        (4) Dockweiler bluffs, los angeles county, california.--Project 
    for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Dockweiler Bluffs, Los Angeles 
    County, California.
        (5) Salt river, california.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
    restoration, Salt River, California.
        (6) San diego river, california.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
    restoration, San Diego River, California, including efforts to 
    address aquatic nuisance species.
        (7) Santa rosa creek, santa rosa, california.--Project for 
    aquatic ecosystem restoration, Santa Rosa Creek in the vicinity of 
    the Prince Memorial Greenway, Santa Rosa, California.
        (8) Stockton deep water ship channel and lower san joaquin 
    river, california.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, 
    Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel and lower San Joaquin River, 
    California.
        (9) Suisun marsh, san pablo bay, california.--Project for 
    aquatic ecosystem restoration, Suisun Marsh, San Pablo Bay, 
    California.
        (10) Sweetwater reservoir, san diego county, california.--
    Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Sweetwater Reservoir, 
    San Diego County, California, including efforts to address aquatic 
    nuisance species.
        (11) Biscayne bay, florida.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
    restoration, Biscayne Bay, Key Biscayne, Florida.
        (12) Clam bayou and dinkins bayou, sanibel island, florida.--
    Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Clam Bayou and Dinkins 
    Bayou, Sanibel Island, Florida.
        (13) Mountain park, georgia.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
    restoration, Mountain Park, Georgia.
        (14) Chattahoochee fall line, georgia and alabama.--Project for 
    aquatic ecosystem restoration, Chattahoochee Fall Line, Georgia and 
    Alabama.
        (15) Longwood cove, gainesville, georgia.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, Longwood Cove, Gainesville, Georgia.
        (16) City park, university lakes, louisiana.--Project for 
    aquatic ecosystem restoration, City Park, University Lakes, 
    Louisiana.
        (17) Lawrence gateway, massachusetts.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration at the Lawrence Gateway quadrant project 
    along the Merrimack and Spicket Rivers in Lawrence, Massachusetts, 
    in accordance with the general conditions established by the 
    project approval of the Environmental Protection Agency, Region I, 
    including filling abandoned drainage facilities and making 
    improvements to the drainage system on the Lawrence Gateway to 
    prevent continued migration of contaminated sediments into the 
    river systems.
        (18) Milford pond, milford, massachusetts.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, Milford Pond, Milford, Massachusetts.
        (19) Mill pond, littleton, massachusetts.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, Mill Pond, Littleton, Massachusetts.
        (20) Pine tree brook, milton, massachusetts.--Project for 
    aquatic ecosystem restoration, Pine Tree Brook, Milton, 
    Massachusetts.
        (21) Clinton river, michigan.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
    restoration, Clinton River, Michigan.
        (22) Kalamazoo river watershed, battle creek, michigan.--
    Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Kalamazoo River 
    watershed, Battle Creek, Michigan.
        (23) Rush lake, minnesota.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
    restoration, Rush Lake, Minnesota.
        (24) South fork of the crow river, hutchinson, minnesota.--
    Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, South Fork of the Crow 
    River, Hutchinson, Minnesota.
        (25) St. louis, missouri.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
    restoration, St. Louis, Missouri.
        (26) Mobley dam, tongue river, montana.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, Mobley Dam, Tongue River, Montana.
        (27) S and h dam, tongue river, montana.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, S and H Dam, Tongue River, Montana.
        (28) Vandalia dam, milk river, montana.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, Vandalia Dam, Milk River, Montana.
        (29) Truckee river, reno, nevada.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, Truckee River, Reno, Nevada, including 
    features for fish passage in Washoe County.
        (30) Grover's mill pond, new jersey.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, Grover's Mill Pond, New Jersey.
        (31) Caldwell county, north carolina.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, Caldwell County, North Carolina.
        (32) Mecklenburg county, north carolina.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
        (33) Dugway creek, bratenahl, ohio.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, Dugway Creek, Bratenahl, Ohio.
        (34) Johnson creek, gresham, oregon.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, Johnson Creek, Gresham, Oregon.
        (35) Beaver creek, beaver and salem, pennsylvania.--Project for 
    aquatic ecosystem restoration, Beaver Creek, Beaver and Salem, 
    Pennsylvania.
        (36) Cementon dam, lehigh river, pennsylvania.--Project for 
    aquatic ecosystem restoration, Cementon Dam, Lehigh River, 
    Pennsylvania.
        (37) Ingham spring dam, solebury township, pennsylvania.--
    Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Ingham Spring Dam, 
    Solebury Township, Pennsylvania.
        (38) Saucon creek, northampton county, pennsylvania.--Project 
    for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Saucon Creek, Northampton 
    County, Pennsylvania.
        (39) Stillwater lake dam, monroe county, pennsylvania.--Project 
    for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Stillwater Lake Dam, Monroe 
    County, Pennsylvania.
        (40) Blackstone river, rhode island.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, Blackstone River, Rhode Island.
        (41) Wilson branch, cheraw, south carolina.--Project for 
    aquatic ecosystem restoration, Wilson Branch, Cheraw, South 
    Carolina.
        (42) White river, bethel, vermont.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, White River, Bethel, Vermont.
        (43) College lake, lynchburg, virginia.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, College Lake, Lynchburg, Virginia.
    (b) Special Rules.--
        (1) Black lake, alaska.--The Secretary shall carry out the 
    project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Black Lake, Alaska 
    referred to in subsection (a)(2) if the Secretary determines that 
    the project is appropriate.
        (2) Truckee river, reno, nevada.--The maximum amount of Federal 
    funds that may be expended for the project for aquatic ecosystem 
    restoration, Truckee River, Reno, Nevada, referred to in subsection 
    (a)(29) shall be $6,000,000 and the Secretary shall carry out the 
    project if the Secretary determines that the project is 
    appropriate.
        (3) Blackstone river, rhode island.--The Secretary shall carry 
    out the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Blackstone 
    River, Rhode Island, referred to in subsection (a)(40) if the 
    Secretary determines that the project is appropriate.
        (4) College lake, lynchburg, virginia.--The Secretary shall 
    carry out the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, College 
    Lake, Lynchburg, Virginia, referred to in subsection (a)(43) if the 
    Secretary determines that the project is appropriate.
SEC. 1007. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SHORELINE PROTECTION.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores 
of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
426g):
        (1) Nelson lagoon, alaska.--Project for shoreline protection, 
    Nelson Lagoon, Alaska.
        (2) Nicholas canyon, los angeles, california.--Project for 
    shoreline protection, Nicholas Canyon, Los Angeles, California.
        (3) Sanibel island, florida.--Project for shoreline protection, 
    Sanibel Island, Florida.
        (4) Apra harbor, guam.--Project for shoreline protection, Apra 
    Harbor, Guam.
        (5) Piti, cabras island, guam.--Project for shoreline 
    protection, Piti, Cabras Island, Guam.
        (6) Narrows and gravesend bay, upper new york bay, brooklyn, 
    new york.--Project for shoreline protection in the vicinity of the 
    confluence of the Narrows and Gravesend Bay, Upper New York Bay, 
    Shore Parkway Greenway, Brooklyn, New York.
        (7) Delaware river, philadelphia naval shipyard, 
    pennsylvania.--Project for shoreline protection, Delaware River in 
    the vicinity of the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Pennsylvania.
        (8) Port aransas, texas.--Project for shoreline protection, 
    Port Aransas, Texas.
SEC. 1008. SMALL PROJECTS FOR SNAGGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study for the following project and, 
if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, the Secretary 
may carry out the project under section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 
August 28, 1937 (33 U.S.C. 701g): Project for removal of snags and 
clearing and straightening of channels for flood control, Kowawese 
Unique Area and Hudson River, New Windsor, New York.
SEC. 1009. SMALL PROJECTS TO PREVENT OR MITIGATE DAMAGE CAUSED BY 
NAVIGATION PROJECTS.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 111 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i):
        (1) Tybee Island, Georgia.
        (2) Burns Waterway Harbor, Indiana.
SEC. 1010. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project 
for aquatic nuisance plant control in the Republican River Basin, 
Nebraska, under section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 
U.S.C. 610).
    (b) Special Rule.--In carrying out the project under subsection 
(a), the Secretary may control and eradicate riverine nuisance plants.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 2001. NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTIONS.
    Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2213) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(n) Non-Federal Contributions.--
        ``(1) Prohibition on solicitation of excess contributions.--The 
    Secretary may not--
            ``(A) solicit contributions from non-Federal interests for 
        costs of constructing authorized water resources projects or 
        measures in excess of the non-Federal share assigned to the 
        appropriate project purposes listed in subsections (a), (b), 
        and (c); or
            ``(B) condition Federal participation in such projects or 
        measures on the receipt of such contributions.
        ``(2) Limitation on statutory construction.--Nothing in this 
    subsection shall be construed to affect the Secretary's authority 
    under section 903(c).''.
SEC. 2002. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS.
    Section 214(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2201 note; 114 Stat. 2594; 119 Stat. 2169; 120 Stat. 318; 120 
Stat. 3197) is amended by striking ``2008'' and inserting ``2009''.
SEC. 2003. WRITTEN AGREEMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS.
    (a) In General.--Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-5b) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``sec. 221.'' and inserting the following:
    ``SEC. 221. WRITTEN AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES 
      PROJECTS.'';
        (2) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:
    ``(a) Cooperation of Non-Federal Interest.--
        ``(1) In general.--After December 31, 1970, the construction of 
    any water resources project, or an acceptable separable element 
    thereof, by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of 
    Engineers, or by a non-Federal interest where such interest will be 
    reimbursed for such construction under any provision of law, shall 
    not be commenced until each non-Federal interest has entered into a 
    written partnership agreement with the Secretary (or, where 
    appropriate, the district engineer for the district in which the 
    project will be carried out) under which each party agrees to carry 
    out its responsibilities and requirements for implementation or 
    construction of the project or the appropriate element of the 
    project, as the case may be; except that no such agreement shall be 
    required if the Secretary determines that the administrative costs 
    associated with negotiating, executing, or administering the 
    agreement would exceed the amount of the contribution required from 
    the non-Federal interest and are less than $25,000.
        ``(2) Liquidated damages.--A partnership agreement described in 
    paragraph (1) may include a provision for liquidated damages in the 
    event of a failure of one or more parties to perform.
        ``(3) Obligation of future appropriations.--In any partnership 
    agreement described in paragraph (1) and entered into by a State, 
    or a body politic of the State which derives its powers from the 
    State constitution, or a governmental entity created by the State 
    legislature, the agreement may reflect that it does not obligate 
    future appropriations for such performance and payment when 
    obligating future appropriations would be inconsistent with 
    constitutional or statutory limitations of the State or a political 
    subdivision of the State.
        ``(4) Credit for in-kind contributions.--
            ``(A) In general.--A partnership agreement described in 
        paragraph (1) may provide with respect to a project that the 
        Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
        of the project, including a project implemented without 
        specific authorization in law, the value of in-kind 
        contributions made by the non-Federal interest, including--
                ``(i) the costs of planning (including data 
            collection), design, management, mitigation, construction, 
            and construction services that are provided by the non-
            Federal interest for implementation of the project;
                ``(ii) the value of materials or services provided 
            before execution of the partnership agreement, including 
            efforts on constructed elements incorporated into the 
            project; and
                ``(iii) the value of materials and services provided 
            after execution of the partnership agreement.
            ``(B) Condition.--The Secretary may credit an in-kind 
        contribution under subparagraph (A) only if the Secretary 
        determines that the material or service provided as an in-kind 
        contribution is integral to the project.
            ``(C) Work performed before partnership agreement.--In any 
        case in which the non-Federal interest is to receive credit 
        under subparagraph (A)(ii) for the cost of work carried out by 
        the non-Federal interest and such work has not been carried out 
        as of the date of enactment of this subparagraph, the Secretary 
        and the non-Federal interest shall enter into an agreement 
        under which the non-Federal interest shall carry out such work, 
        and only work carried out following the execution of the 
        agreement shall be eligible for credit.
            ``(D) Limitations.--Credit authorized under this paragraph 
        for a project--
                ``(i) shall not exceed the non-Federal share of the 
            cost of the project;
                ``(ii) shall not alter any other requirement that a 
            non-Federal interest provide lands, easements, relocations, 
            rights-of-way, or areas for disposal of dredged material 
            for the project;
                ``(iii) shall not alter any requirement that a non-
            Federal interest pay a portion of the costs of construction 
            of the project under sections 101 and 103 of the Water 
            Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211; 33 
            U.S.C. 2213); and
                ``(iv) shall not exceed the actual and reasonable costs 
            of the materials, services, or other things provided by the 
            non-Federal interest, as determined by the Secretary.
            ``(E) Applicability.--
                ``(i) In general.--This paragraph shall apply to water 
            resources projects authorized after November 16, 1986, 
            including projects initiated after November 16, 1986, 
            without specific authorization in law.
                ``(ii) Limitation.--In any case in which a specific 
            provision of law provides for a non-Federal interest to 
            receive credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of 
            a study for, or construction or operation and maintenance 
            of, a water resources project, the specific provision of 
            law shall apply instead of this paragraph.''.
    (b) Non-Federal Interest.--Section 221(b) of such Act is amended to 
read as follows:
    ``(b) Definition of Non-Federal Interest.--The term `non-Federal 
interest' means--
        ``(1) a legally constituted public body (including a federally 
    recognized Indian tribe); or
        ``(2) a nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local 
    government,
that has full authority and capability to perform the terms of its 
agreement and to pay damages, if necessary, in the event of failure to 
perform.''.
    (c) Program Administration.--Section 221 of such Act is further 
amended--
        (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (h); and
        (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Delegation of Authority.--Not later than June 30, 2008, the 
Secretary shall issue policies and guidelines for partnership 
agreements that delegate to the district engineers, at a minimum--
        ``(1) the authority to approve any policy in a partnership 
    agreement that has appeared in an agreement previously approved by 
    the Secretary;
        ``(2) the authority to approve any policy in a partnership 
    agreement the specific terms of which are dictated by law or by a 
    final feasibility study, final environmental impact statement, or 
    other final decision document for a water resources project;
        ``(3) the authority to approve any partnership agreement that 
    complies with the policies and guidelines issued by the Secretary; 
    and
        ``(4) the authority to sign any partnership agreement for any 
    water resources project unless, within 30 days of the date of 
    authorization of the project, the Secretary notifies the district 
    engineer in which the project will be carried out that the 
    Secretary wishes to retain the prerogative to sign the partnership 
    agreement for that project.
    ``(f) Report to Congress.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
enactment of this subsection, and every year thereafter, the Secretary 
shall submit to Congress a report detailing the following:
        ``(1) The number of partnership agreements signed by district 
    engineers and the number of partnership agreements signed by the 
    Secretary.
        ``(2) For any partnership agreement signed by the Secretary, an 
    explanation of why delegation to the district engineer was not 
    appropriate.
    ``(g) Public Availability.--Not later than 120 days after the date 
of enactment of this subsection, the Chief of Engineers shall--
        ``(1) ensure that each district engineer has made available to 
    the public, including on the Internet, all partnership agreements 
    entered into under this section within the preceding 10 years and 
    all partnership agreements for water resources projects currently 
    being carried out in that district; and
        ``(2) make each partnership agreement entered into after such 
    date of enactment available to the public, including on the 
    Internet, not later than 7 days after the date on which such 
    agreement is entered into.''.
    (d) Local Cooperation.--Section 912(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (101 Stat. 4190) is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (2)--
            (A) by striking ``shall'' the first place it appears and 
        inserting ``may''; and
            (B) by striking the last sentence; and
        (2) in paragraph (4)--
            (A) by inserting after ``injunction, for'' the following: 
        ``payment of damages or, for'';
            (B) by striking ``to collect a civil penalty imposed under 
        this section,''; and
            (C) by striking ``any civil penalty imposed under this 
        section,'' and inserting ``any damages,''.
    (e) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsections (a), (b), 
and (d) only apply to partnership agreements entered into after the 
date of enactment of this Act; except that, at the request of a non-
Federal interest for a project, the district engineer for the district 
in which the project is located may amend a project partnership 
agreement entered into on or before such date and under which 
construction on the project has not been initiated as of such date of 
enactment for the purpose of incorporating such amendments.
    (f) Agreements and References.--
        (1) In general.--A goal of agreements entered into under 
    section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) 
    shall be to further partnership and cooperation, and the agreements 
    shall be referred to as ``partnership agreements''.
        (2) References to cooperation agreements.--Any reference in a 
    law, regulation, document, or other paper of the United States to a 
    ``cooperation agreement'' or ``project cooperation agreement'' 
    shall be deemed to be a reference to a ``partnership agreement'' or 
    a ``project partnership agreement'', respectively.
        (3) References to partnership agreements.--Any reference to a 
    ``partnership agreement'' or ``project partnership agreement'' in 
    this Act (other than this section) shall be deemed to be a 
    reference to a ``cooperation agreement'' or a ``project cooperation 
    agreement'', respectively.
SEC. 2004. COMPILATION OF LAWS.
    (a) Compilation of Laws Enacted After November 8, 1966.--The 
Secretary and the Chief of Engineers shall prepare a compilation of the 
laws of the United States relating to the improvement of rivers and 
harbors, flood damage reduction, beach and shoreline erosion, hurricane 
and storm damage reduction, ecosystem and environmental restoration, 
and other water resources development enacted after November 8, 1966, 
and before January 1, 2008, and have such compilation printed for the 
use of the Department of the Army, Congress, and the general public.
    (b) Reprint of Laws Enacted Before November 8, 1966.--The Secretary 
shall have the volumes containing the laws referred to in subsection 
(a) enacted before November 8, 1966, reprinted.
    (c) Index.--The Secretary shall include an index in each volume 
compiled, and each volume reprinted, pursuant to this section.
    (d) Congressional Copies.--Not later than April 1, 2008, the 
Secretary shall transmit at least 25 copies of each volume compiled, 
and of each volume reprinted, pursuant to this section to each of the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
the Senate.
    (e) Availability.--The Secretary shall ensure that each volume 
compiled, and each volume reprinted, pursuant to this section are 
available through electronic means, including on the Internet.
SEC. 2005. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL.
    Section 217 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2326a) is amended--
        (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d);
        (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Dredged Material Facility.--
        ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may enter into a partnership 
    agreement under section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
    U.S.C. 1962d-5b) with one or more non-Federal interests with 
    respect to a water resources project, or group of water resources 
    projects within a geographic region, if appropriate, for the 
    acquisition, design, construction, management, or operation of a 
    dredged material processing, treatment, contaminant reduction, or 
    disposal facility (including any facility used to demonstrate 
    potential beneficial uses of dredged material, which may include 
    effective sediment contaminant reduction technologies) using funds 
    provided in whole or in part by the Federal Government.
        ``(2) Performance.--One or more of the parties to a partnership 
    agreement under this subsection may perform the acquisition, 
    design, construction, management, or operation of a dredged 
    material processing, treatment, contaminant reduction, or disposal 
    facility.
        ``(3) Multiple projects.--If appropriate, the Secretary may 
    combine portions of separate water resources projects with 
    appropriate combined cost-sharing among the various water resources 
    projects in a partnership agreement for a facility under this 
    subsection if the facility serves to manage dredged material from 
    multiple water resources projects located in the geographic region 
    of the facility.
        ``(4) Specified federal funding sources and cost sharing.--
            ``(A) Specified federal funding.--A partnership agreement 
        with respect to a facility under this subsection shall 
        specify--
                ``(i) the Federal funding sources and combined cost-
            sharing when applicable to multiple water resources 
            projects; and
                ``(ii) the responsibilities and risks of each of the 
            parties relating to present and future dredged material 
            managed by the facility.
            ``(B) Management of sediments.--
                ``(i) In general.--A partnership agreement under this 
            subsection may include the management of sediments from the 
            maintenance dredging of Federal water resources projects 
            that do not have partnership agreements.
                ``(ii) Payments.--A partnership agreement under this 
            subsection may allow the non-Federal interest to receive 
            reimbursable payments from the Federal Government for 
            commitments made by the non-Federal interest for disposal 
            or placement capacity at dredged material processing, 
            treatment, contaminant reduction, or disposal facilities.
            ``(C) Credit.--A partnership agreement under this 
        subsection may allow costs incurred by the non-Federal interest 
        before execution of the partnership agreement to be credited in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
        (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b).
        ``(5) Credit.--
            ``(A) Effect on existing agreements.--Nothing in this 
        subsection supersedes or modifies an agreement in effect on the 
        date of enactment of this paragraph between the Federal 
        Government and any non-Federal interest for the cost-sharing, 
        construction, and operation and maintenance of a water 
        resources project.
            ``(B) Credit for funds.--Subject to the approval of the 
        Secretary and in accordance with law (including regulations and 
        policies) in effect on the date of enactment of this paragraph, 
        a non-Federal interest for a water resources project may 
        receive credit for funds provided for the acquisition, design, 
        construction, management, or operation of a dredged material 
        processing, treatment, contaminant reduction, or disposal 
        facility to the extent the facility is used to manage dredged 
        material from the project.
            ``(C) Non-federal interest responsibilities.--A non-Federal 
        interest entering into a partnership agreement under this 
        subsection for a facility shall--
                ``(i) be responsible for providing all necessary lands, 
            easements, relocations, and rights-of-way associated with 
            the facility; and
                ``(ii) receive credit toward the non-Federal share of 
            the cost of the project with respect to which the agreement 
            is being entered into for those items.''; and
        (3) in paragraphs (1) and (2)(A) of subsection (d) (as 
    redesignated by paragraph (1))--
            (A) by inserting ``and maintenance'' after ``operation'' 
        each place it appears; and
            (B) by inserting ``processing, treatment, contaminant 
        reduction, or'' after ``dredged material'' the first place it 
        appears in each of those paragraphs.
SEC. 2006. REMOTE AND SUBSISTENCE HARBORS.
    (a) In General.--In conducting a study of harbor and navigation 
improvements, the Secretary may recommend a project without the need to 
demonstrate that the project is justified solely by national economic 
development benefits if the Secretary determines that--
        (1)(A) the community to be served by the project is at least 70 
    miles from the nearest surface accessible commercial port and has 
    no direct rail or highway link to another community served by a 
    surface accessible port or harbor; or
        (B) the project would be located in the State of Hawaii, the 
    Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern 
    Mariana Islands, the United States Virgin Islands, or American 
    Samoa;
        (2) the harbor is economically critical such that over 80 
    percent of the goods transported through the harbor would be 
    consumed within the community served by the harbor and navigation 
    improvement; and
        (3) the long-term viability of the community would be 
    threatened without the harbor and navigation improvement.
    (b) Justification.--In considering whether to recommend a project 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider the benefits of the 
project to--
        (1) public health and safety of the local community, including 
    access to facilities designed to protect public health and safety;
        (2) access to natural resources for subsistence purposes;
        (3) local and regional economic opportunities;
        (4) welfare of the local population; and
        (5) social and cultural value to the community.
SEC. 2007. USE OF OTHER FEDERAL FUNDS.
    The non-Federal interest for a water resources study or project may 
use, and the Secretary shall accept, funds provided by a Federal agency 
under any other Federal program, to satisfy, in whole or in part, the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the study or project if the Federal 
agency that provides the funds determines that the funds are authorized 
to be used to carry out the study or project.
SEC. 2008. REVISION OF PROJECT PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT; COST SHARING.
    (a) Federal Allocation.--Upon authorization by law of an increase 
in the maximum amount of Federal funds that may be allocated for a 
water resources project or an increase in the total cost of a water 
resources project authorized to be carried out by the Secretary, the 
Secretary shall enter into a revised partnership agreement for the 
project to take into account the change in Federal participation in the 
project.
    (b)  Cost Sharing.--An increase in the maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be allocated for a water resources project, or an 
increase in the total cost of a water resources project, authorized to 
be carried out by the Secretary shall not affect any cost-sharing 
requirement applicable to the project.
    (c) Cost Estimates.--The estimated Federal and non-Federal costs of 
water resources projects authorized to be carried out by the Secretary 
before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act are for 
informational purposes only and shall not be interpreted as affecting 
the cost-sharing responsibilities established by law.
SEC. 2009. EXPEDITED ACTIONS FOR EMERGENCY FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.
    The Secretary shall expedite any authorized planning, design, and 
construction of any project for flood damage reduction for an area 
that, within the preceding 5 years, has been subject to flooding that 
resulted in the loss of life and caused damage of sufficient severity 
and magnitude to warrant a declaration of a major disaster by the 
President under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).
SEC. 2010. WATERSHED AND RIVER BASIN ASSESSMENTS.
    Section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2267a; 114 Stat. 2587-2588; 100 Stat. 4164) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (d)--
            (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (4);
            (B) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (5) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (C) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(6) Tuscarawas River Basin, Ohio;
        ``(7) Sauk River Basin, Snohomish and Skagit Counties, 
    Washington;
        ``(8) Niagara River Basin, New York;
        ``(9) Genesee River Basin, New York; and
        ``(10) White River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.'';
        (2) by striking paragraph (1) of subsection (f) and inserting 
    the following:
        ``(1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the costs of 
    an assessment carried out under this section on or after December 
    11, 2000, shall be 25 percent.''; and
        (3) by striking subsection (g).
SEC. 2011. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.
    (a) Program.--Section 203(b) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2269(b); 114 Stat. 2589) is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (1) by inserting ``carry out water-related 
    planning activities and'' after ``the Secretary may'';
        (2) in paragraph (1)(B) by inserting after ``Code'' the 
    following: ``, and including lands that are within the 
    jurisdictional area of an Oklahoma Indian tribe, as determined by 
    the Secretary of the Interior, and are recognized by the Secretary 
    of the Interior as eligible for trust land status under part 151 of 
    title 25, Code of Federal Regulations''; and
        (3) in paragraph (2)--
            (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (A);
            (B) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); 
        and
            (C) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following:
            ``(B) watershed assessments and planning activities; and''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 203(e) of such Act is 
amended by striking ``2006'' and inserting ``2012''.
SEC. 2012. WILDFIRE FIREFIGHTING.
    Section 309 of Public Law 102-154 (42 U.S.C. 1856a-1; 105 Stat. 
1034) is amended by inserting ``the Secretary of the Army,'' after 
``the Secretary of Energy,''.
SEC. 2013. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.
    Section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-16) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``The Secretary'' and 
    inserting the following:
    ``(a) Federal State Cooperation.--
        ``(1) Comprehensive plans.--The Secretary'';
        (2) by inserting after the last sentence in subsection (a) the 
    following:
        ``(2) Technical assistance.--
            ``(A) In general.--At the request of a governmental agency 
        or non-Federal interest, the Secretary may provide, at Federal 
        expense, technical assistance to such agency or non-Federal 
        interest in managing water resources.
            ``(B) Types of assistance.--Technical assistance under this 
        paragraph may include provision and integration of hydrologic, 
        economic, and environmental data and analyses.'';
        (3) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ``this section'' each 
    place it appears and inserting ``subsection (a)(1)'';
        (4) in subsection (b)(2) by striking ``Up to \1/2\ of the'' and 
    inserting ``The'';
        (5) in subsection (c) by striking ``(c) There is'' and 
    inserting the following:
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--
        ``(1) Federal and state cooperation.--There is'';
        (6) in subsection (c)(1) (as designated by paragraph (5))--
            (A) by striking ``the provisions of this section'' and 
        inserting ``subsection (a)(1),''; and
            (B) by striking ``$500,000'' and inserting ``$2,000,000'';
        (7) by inserting at the end of subsection (c) the following:
        ``(2) Technical assistance.--There is authorized to be 
    appropriated $5,000,000 annually to carry out subsection (a)(2), of 
    which not more than $2,000,000 annually may be used by the 
    Secretary to enter into cooperative agreements with nonprofit 
    organizations to provide assistance to rural and small 
    communities.'';
        (8) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
        (9) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Annual Submission of Proposed Activities.--Concurrent with 
the President's submission to Congress of the President's request for 
appropriations for the Civil Works Program for a fiscal year, the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report describing the 
individual activities proposed for funding under subsection (a)(1) for 
that fiscal year.''.
SEC. 2014. LAKES PROGRAM.
    Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4148; 110 Stat. 3758; 113 Stat. 295) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``and'' at end of paragraph (18);
        (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (19) and 
    inserting a semicolon; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(20) Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois, removal of silt 
    and aquatic growth and measures to address excessive sedimentation;
        ``(21) McCarter Pond, Borough of Fairhaven, New Jersey, removal 
    of silt and measures to address water quality;
        ``(22) Rogers Pond, Franklin Township, New Jersey, removal of 
    silt and restoration of structural integrity;
        ``(23) Greenwood Lake, New York and New Jersey, removal of silt 
    and aquatic growth;
        ``(24) Lake Rodgers, Creedmoor, North Carolina, removal of silt 
    and excessive nutrients and restoration of structural integrity;
        ``(25) Lake Sakakawea, North Dakota, removal of silt and 
    aquatic growth and measures to address excessive sedimentation;
        ``(26) Lake Luxembourg, Pennsylvania;
        ``(27) Lake Fairlee, Vermont, removal of silt and aquatic 
    growth and measures to address excessive sedimentation; and
        ``(28) Lake Morley, Vermont, removal of silt and aquatic growth 
    and measures to address excessive sedimentation.''.
SEC. 2015. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.
    (a) In General.--For the purpose of expediting the cost-effective 
design and construction of wetlands restoration that is part of an 
authorized water resources project, the Secretary may enter into 
cooperative agreements under section 6305 of title 31, United States 
Code, with nonprofit organizations with expertise in wetlands 
restoration to carry out such design and construction on behalf of the 
Secretary.
    (b) Limitations.--
        (1) Per project limit.--A cooperative agreement under this 
    section may not obligate the Secretary to pay the nonprofit 
    organization more than $1,000,000 for any single wetlands 
    restoration project.
        (2) Annual limit.--The total value of work carried out under 
    cooperative agreements under this section may not exceed $5,000,000 
    in any fiscal year.
SEC. 2016. TRAINING FUNDS.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may include individuals not employed 
by the Department of the Army in training classes and courses offered 
by the Corps of Engineers in any case in which the Secretary determines 
that it is in the best interest of the Federal Government to include 
those individuals as participants.
    (b) Expenses.--
        (1) In general.--An individual not employed by the Department 
    of the Army attending a training class or course described in 
    subsection (a) shall pay the full cost of the training provided to 
    the individual.
        (2) Payments.--Payments made by an individual for training 
    received under paragraph (1), up to the actual cost of the 
    training--
            (A) may be retained by the Secretary;
            (B) shall be credited to an appropriations account used for 
        paying training costs; and
            (C) shall be available for use by the Secretary, without 
        further appropriation, for training purposes.
        (3) Excess amounts.--Any payments received under paragraph (2) 
    that are in excess of the actual cost of training provided shall be 
    credited as miscellaneous receipts to the Treasury of the United 
    States.
SEC. 2017. ACCESS TO WATER RESOURCE DATA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a program to provide 
public access to water resources and related water quality data in the 
custody of the Corps of Engineers.
    (b) Data.--Public access under subsection (a) shall--
        (1) include, at a minimum, access to data generated in water 
    resources project development and regulation under section 404 of 
    the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344); and
        (2) appropriately employ geographic information system 
    technology and linkages to water resource models and analytical 
    techniques.
    (c) Partnerships.--To the maximum extent practicable, in carrying 
out activities under this section, the Secretary shall develop 
partnerships, including cooperative agreements, with State, tribal, and 
local governments and other Federal agencies.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000 for each fiscal year.
SEC. 2018. SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS.
    (a) In General.--In accordance with the Act of July 3, 1930 (33 
U.S.C. 426), and notwithstanding administrative actions, it is the 
policy of the United States to promote beach nourishment for the 
purposes of flood damage reduction and hurricane and storm damage 
reduction and related research that encourage the protection, 
restoration, and enhancement of sandy beaches, including beach 
restoration and periodic beach renourishment for a period of 50 years, 
on a comprehensive and coordinated basis by the Federal Government, 
States, localities, and private enterprises.
    (b) Preference.--In carrying out the policy under subsection (a), 
preference shall be given to--
        (1) areas in which there has been a Federal investment of funds 
    for the purposes described in subsection (a); and
        (2) areas with respect to which the need for prevention or 
    mitigation of damage to shores and beaches is attributable to 
    Federal navigation projects or other Federal activities.
    (c) Applicability.--The Secretary shall apply the policy under 
subsection (a) to each shore protection and beach renourishment project 
(including shore protection and beach renourishment projects 
constructed before the date of enactment of this Act).
SEC. 2019. ABILITY TO PAY.
    (a) Criteria and Procedures.--Section 103(m)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)(2)) is amended by 
striking ``180 days after such date of enactment'' and inserting 
``December 31, 2007''.
    (b) Projects.--The Secretary shall apply the criteria and 
procedures referred to in section 103(m) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)) to the following projects:
        (1) St. johns bayou and new madrid floodway, missouri.--The 
    project for flood control, St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, 
    Missouri, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4118).
        (2) Lower rio grande basin, texas.--The project for flood 
    control, Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas, authorized by section 
    401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
    4125).
        (3) West virginia and pennsylvania projects.--The projects for 
    flood control authorized by section 581 of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3790-3791).
SEC. 2020. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM AND ESTUARY RESTORATION.
    Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330; 110 Stat. 3679) is amended--
        (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:
    ``(a) General Authority.--
        ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may carry out a project to 
    restore and protect an aquatic ecosystem or estuary if the 
    Secretary determines that the project--
            ``(A)(i) will improve the quality of the environment and is 
        in the public interest; or
            ``(ii) will improve the elements and features of an estuary 
        (as defined in section 103 of the Estuaries and Clean Waters 
        Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2902)); and
            ``(B) is cost-effective.
        ``(2) Dam removal.--A project under this section may include 
    removal of a dam.''; and
        (2) in subsection (e) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting 
    ``$50,000,000''.
SEC. 2021. SMALL FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECTS.
    Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) is 
amended by striking ``$50,000,000'' and inserting ``$55,000,000''.
SEC. 2022. SMALL RIVER AND HARBOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS.
    Section 107(b) of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
577(b)) is amended by striking ``$4,000,000'' and inserting 
``$7,000,000''.
SEC. 2023. PROTECTION OF HIGHWAYS, BRIDGE APPROACHES, PUBLIC WORKS, AND 
NONPROFIT PUBLIC SERVICES.
    Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r) is 
amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting ``$1,500,000''.
SEC. 2024. MODIFICATION OF PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF 
THE ENVIRONMENT.
    Section 1135(h) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2309a(h)) is amended by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting 
``$40,000,000''.
SEC. 2025. REMEDIATION OF ABANDONED MINE SITES.
    Section 560(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (33 
U.S.C. 2336(f)) is amended by striking ``$7,500,000'' and inserting 
``$20,000,000''.
SEC. 2026. LEASING AUTHORITY.
    Section 4 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction 
of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and 
other purposes'', approved December 22, 1944 (16 U.S.C. 460d), is 
amended--
        (1) by inserting ``federally recognized Indian tribes and'' 
    before ``Federal'' the first place it appears;
        (2) by inserting ``Indian tribes or'' after ``considerations, 
    to such''; and
        (3) by inserting ``federally recognized Indian tribe'' after 
    ``That in any such lease or license to a''.
SEC. 2027. FISCAL TRANSPARENCY REPORT.
    (a) In General.--On the third Tuesday of January of each year 
beginning January 2008, the Chief of Engineers shall submit to the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives a report on--
        (1) the expenditures by the Corps for the preceding fiscal year 
    and estimated expenditures by the Corps for the current fiscal 
    year; and
        (2) for projects and activities that are not scheduled for 
    completion in the current fiscal year, the estimated expenditures 
    by the Corps necessary in the following fiscal year for each 
    project or activity to maintain the same level of effort being 
    achieved in the current fiscal year.
    (b) Contents.--In addition to the information described in 
subsection (a), the report shall contain a detailed accounting of the 
following information:
        (1) With respect to activities carried out with funding 
    provided under the Construction appropriations account for the 
    Secretary, information on--
            (A) projects currently under construction, including--
                (i) allocations to date;
                (ii) the number of years remaining to complete 
            construction;
                (iii) the estimated annual Federal cost to maintain 
            that construction schedule; and
                (iv) a list of projects the Corps of Engineers expects 
            to complete during the current fiscal year; and
            (B) projects for which there is a signed partnership 
        agreement and completed planning, engineering, and design, 
        including--
                (i) the number of years the project is expected to 
            require for completion; and
                (ii) estimated annual Federal cost to maintain that 
            construction schedule.
        (2) With respect to operation and maintenance of the inland and 
    intracoastal waterways identified by section 206 of the Inland 
    Waterways Revenue Act of 1978 (33 U.S.C. 1804)--
            (A) the estimated annual cost to maintain each waterway for 
        the authorized reach and at the authorized depth;
            (B) the estimated annual cost of operation and maintenance 
        of locks and dams to ensure navigation without interruption; 
        and
            (C) the actual expenditures to maintain each waterway.
        (3) With respect to activities carried out with funding 
    provided under the Investigations appropriations account for the 
    Secretary--
            (A) the number of active studies;
            (B) the number of completed studies not yet authorized for 
        construction;
            (C) the number of initiated studies; and
            (D) the number of studies expected to be completed during 
        the fiscal year.
        (4) Funding received and estimates of funds to be received for 
    interagency and international support activities under section 234 
    of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2323a).
        (5) Recreation fees and lease payments.
        (6) Hydropower and water storage receipts.
        (7) Deposits into the Inland Waterways Trust Fund and the 
    Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund.
        (8) Other revenues and fees collected by the Corps of 
    Engineers.
        (9) With respect to permit applications and notifications, a 
    list of individual permit applications and nationwide permit 
    notifications, including--
            (A) the date on which each permit application is filed;
            (B) the date on which each permit application is determined 
        to be complete;
            (C) the date on which any permit application is withdrawn; 
        and
            (D) the date on which the Corps of Engineers grants or 
        denies each permit.
        (10) With respect to projects that are authorized but for which 
    construction is not complete, a list of such projects for which no 
    funds have been allocated for the 5 preceding fiscal years, 
    including, for each project--
            (A) the authorization date;
            (B) the last allocation date;
            (C) the percentage of construction completed;
            (D) the estimated cost remaining until completion of the 
        project; and
            (E) a brief explanation of the reasons for the delay.
SEC. 2028. SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM.
    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 2361 of title 10, United 
States Code, the Secretary may provide assistance through contracts, 
cooperative agreements, and grants to--
        (1) the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, for 
    establishment and operation of the Southeastern Water Resources 
    Institute to study sustainable development and utilization of water 
    resources in the southeastern United States;
        (2) Lewis and Clark Community College, Illinois, for the Great 
    Rivers National Research and Education Center (including facilities 
    that have been or will be constructed at one or more locations in 
    the vicinity of the confluence of the Illinois River, the Missouri 
    River, and the Mississippi River), a collaborative effort of Lewis 
    and Clark Community College, the University of Illinois, the 
    Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Environmental 
    Sciences, and other entities, for the study of river ecology, 
    developing watershed and river management strategies, and educating 
    students and the public on river issues; and
        (3) the University of Texas at Dallas for support and operation 
    of the International Center for Decision and Risk Analysis to study 
    risk analysis and control methods for transboundary water resources 
    management in the southwestern United States and other 
    international water resources management problems.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out subsection (a)(1) 
$2,000,000, to carry out subsection (a)(2) $2,000,000, and to carry out 
subsection (a)(3) $5,000,000.
SEC. 2029. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON CRITERIA FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 
OF HARBOR DREDGING PROJECTS.
    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
        (1) Insufficient maintenance dredging results in inefficient 
    water transportation and harmful economic consequences.
        (2) The estimated dredging backlog at commercial harbors in the 
    Great Lakes alone is 16,000,000 cubic yards.
        (3) Approximately two-thirds of all shipping in the United 
    States either starts or finishes at small harbors.
        (4) Small harbors often have a greater proportional impact on 
    local economies than do larger harbors.
        (5) Performance metrics can be valuable tools in the budget 
    process for water resources projects.
        (6) The use of a single performance metric for water resources 
    projects can result in a budget biased against small and rural 
    communities.
    (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the 
operations and maintenance budget of the Corps of Engineers should 
reflect the use of all available economic data, rather than a single 
performance metric.
SEC. 2030. INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT AUTHORITY.
    Section 234 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2323a) is amended--
        (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:
    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary may engage in activities 
(including contracting) in support of other Federal agencies, 
international organizations, or foreign governments to address problems 
of national significance to the United States.'';
        (2) in subsection (b) by striking ``Secretary of State'' and 
    inserting ``Department of State''; and
        (3) in subsection (d)--
            (A) by striking ``$250,000 for fiscal year 2001'' and 
        inserting ``$1,000,000 for fiscal year 2008''; and
            (B) by striking ``or international organizations'' and 
        inserting ``, international organizations, or foreign 
        governments''.
SEC. 2031. WATER RESOURCES PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES.
    (a) National Water Resources Planning Policy.--It is the policy of 
the United States that all water resources projects should reflect 
national priorities, encourage economic development, and protect the 
environment by--
        (1) seeking to maximize sustainable economic development;
        (2) seeking to avoid the unwise use of floodplains and flood-
    prone areas and minimizing adverse impacts and vulnerabilities in 
    any case in which a floodplain or flood-prone area must be used; 
    and
        (3) protecting and restoring the functions of natural systems 
    and mitigating any unavoidable damage to natural systems.
    (b) Principles and Guidelines.--
        (1) Principles and guidelines defined.--In this subsection, the 
    term ``principles and guidelines'' means the principles and 
    guidelines contained in the document prepared by the Water 
    Resources Council pursuant to section 103 of the Water Resources 
    Planning Act (42 U.S.C. 1962a-2), entitled ``Economic and 
    Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land 
    Resources Implementation Studies'', and dated March 10, 1983.
        (2) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue revisions, 
    consistent with paragraph (3), to the principles and guidelines for 
    use by the Secretary in the formulation, evaluation, and 
    implementation of water resources projects.
        (3) Considerations.--In developing revisions to the principles 
    and guidelines under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall evaluate 
    the consistency of the principles and guidelines with, and ensure 
    that the principles and guidelines address, the following:
            (A) The use of best available economic principles and 
        analytical techniques, including techniques in risk and 
        uncertainty analysis.
            (B) The assessment and incorporation of public safety in 
        the formulation of alternatives and recommended plans.
            (C) Assessment methods that reflect the value of projects 
        for low-income communities and projects that use nonstructural 
        approaches to water resources development and management.
            (D) The assessment and evaluation of the interaction of a 
        project with other water resources projects and programs within 
        a region or watershed.
            (E) The use of contemporary water resources paradigms, 
        including integrated water resources management and adaptive 
        management.
            (F) Evaluation methods that ensure that water resources 
        projects are justified by public benefits.
        (4) Consultation and public participation.--In carrying out 
    paragraph (2), the Secretary shall--
            (A) consult with the Secretary of the Interior, the 
        Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Commerce, the 
        Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the Secretary of 
        Transportation, the Administrator of the Environmental 
        Protection Agency, the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of 
        Homeland Security, the National Academy of Sciences, and the 
        Council on Environmental Quality; and
            (B) solicit and consider public and expert comments.
        (5) Publication.--The Secretary shall--
            (A) submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
        of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives copies of--
                (i) the revisions to the principles and guidelines for 
            use by the Secretary; and
                (ii) an explanation of the intent of each revision, how 
            each revision is consistent with this section, and the 
            probable impact of each revision on water resources 
            projects carried out by the Secretary; and
            (B) make the revisions to the principles and guidelines for 
        use by the Secretary available to the public, including on the 
        Internet.
        (6) Effect.--Subject to the requirements of this subsection, 
    the principles and guidelines as revised under this subsection 
    shall apply to water resources projects carried out by the 
    Secretary instead of the principles and guidelines for such 
    projects in effect on the day before date of enactment of this Act.
        (7) Applicability.--After the date of issuance of the revisions 
    to the principles and guidelines, the revisions shall apply--
            (A) to all water resources projects carried out by the 
        Secretary, other than projects for which the Secretary has 
        commenced a feasibility study before the date of such issuance;
            (B) at the request of a non-Federal interest, to a water 
        resources project for which the Secretary has commenced a 
        feasibility study before the date of such issuance; and
            (C) to the reevaluation or modification of a water 
        resources project, other than a reevaluation or modification 
        that has been commenced by the Secretary before the date of 
        such issuance.
        (8) Existing studies.--Revisions to the principles and 
    guidelines issued under paragraph (2) shall not affect the validity 
    of any completed study of a water resources project.
        (9) Recommendation.--Upon completion of the revisions to the 
    principles and guidelines for use by the Secretary, the Secretary 
    shall make a recommendation to Congress as to the advisability of 
    repealing subsections (a) and (b) of section 80 of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-17).
SEC. 2032. WATER RESOURCE PRIORITIES REPORT.
    (a) In General.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the President shall submit to Congress a report describing 
the vulnerability of the United States to damage from flooding, 
including--
        (1) the risk to human life;
        (2) the risk to property; and
        (3) the comparative risks faced by different regions of the 
    United States.
    (b) Inclusions.--The report under subsection (a) shall include--
        (1) an assessment of the extent to which programs in the United 
    States relating to flooding address flood risk reduction 
    priorities;
        (2) the extent to which those programs may be encouraging 
    development and economic activity in flood-prone areas;
        (3) recommendations for improving those programs with respect 
    to reducing and responding to flood risks; and
        (4) proposals for implementing the recommendations.
SEC. 2033. PLANNING.
    (a) Matters to Be Addressed in Planning.--Section 904 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2281) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``Enhancing'' and inserting the following:
    ``(a) In General.--Enhancing''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Assessments.--For all feasibility reports for water resources 
projects completed after December 31, 2007, the Secretary shall assess 
whether--
        ``(1) the water resources project and each separable element is 
    cost-effective; and
        ``(2) the water resources project complies with Federal, State, 
    and local laws (including regulations) and public policies.''.
    (b) Planning Process Improvements.--The Chief of Engineers--
        (1) shall adopt a risk analysis approach to project cost 
    estimates for water resources projects; and
        (2) not later than one year after the date of enactment of this 
    Act, shall--
            (A) issue procedures for risk analysis for cost estimation 
        for water resources projects; and
            (B) submit to Congress a report that includes any 
        recommended amendments to section 902 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280).
    (c) Benchmarks.--
        (1) In general.--Not later than 12 months after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Chief of Engineers shall establish 
    benchmarks for determining the length of time it should take to 
    conduct a feasibility study for a water resources project and its 
    associated review process under the National Environmental Policy 
    Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). The Chief of Engineers shall 
    use such benchmarks as a management tool to make the feasibility 
    study process more efficient in all districts of the Corps of 
    Engineers.
        (2) Benchmark goals.--The Chief of Engineers shall establish, 
    to the extent practicable, under paragraph (1) benchmark goals for 
    completion of feasibility studies for water resources projects 
    generally within 2 years. In the case of feasibility studies that 
    the Chief of Engineers determines may require additional time based 
    on the project type, size, cost, or complexity, the benchmark goal 
    for completion shall be generally within 4 years.
     (d) Calculation of Benefits and Costs for Flood Damage Reduction 
Projects.--A feasibility study for a project for flood damage reduction 
shall include, as part of the calculation of benefits and costs--
        (1) a calculation of the residual risk of flooding following 
    completion of the proposed project;
        (2) a calculation of the residual risk of loss of human life 
    and residual risk to human safety following completion of the 
    proposed project;
        (3) a calculation of any upstream or downstream impacts of the 
    proposed project; and
        (4) calculations to ensure that the benefits and costs 
    associated with structural and nonstructural alternatives are 
    evaluated in an equitable manner.
    (e) Centers of Specialized Planning Expertise.--
        (1) Establishment.--The Secretary may establish centers of 
    expertise to provide specialized planning expertise for water 
    resources projects to be carried out by the Secretary in order to 
    enhance and supplement the capabilities of the districts of the 
    Corps of Engineers.
        (2) Duties.--A center of expertise established under this 
    subsection shall--
            (A) provide technical and managerial assistance to district 
        commanders of the Corps of Engineers for project planning, 
        development, and implementation;
            (B) provide agency peer reviews of new major scientific, 
        engineering, or economic methods, models, or analyses that will 
        be used to support decisions of the Secretary with respect to 
        feasibility studies for water resources projects;
            (C) provide support for independent peer review panels 
        under section 2034; and
            (D) carry out such other duties as are prescribed by the 
        Secretary.
    (f) Completion of Corps of Engineers Reports.--
        (1) Alternatives.--
            (A) In general.--Feasibility and other studies and 
        assessments for a water resources project shall include 
        recommendations for alternatives--
                (i) that, as determined in coordination with the non-
            Federal interest for the project, promote integrated water 
            resources management; and
                (ii) for which the non-Federal interest is willing to 
            provide the non-Federal share for the studies or 
            assessments.
            (B) Constraints.--The alternatives contained in studies and 
        assessments described in subparagraph (A) shall not be 
        constrained by budgetary or other policy.
            (C) Reports of chief of engineers.--The reports of the 
        Chief of Engineers shall identify any recommendation that is 
        not the best technical solution to water resource needs and 
        problems and the reason for the deviation.
        (2) Report completion.--The completion of a report of the Chief 
    of Engineers for a water resources project--
            (A) shall not be delayed while consideration is being given 
        to potential changes in policy or priority for project 
        consideration; and
            (B) shall be submitted, on completion, to--
                (i) the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
            the Senate; and
                (ii) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
            of the House of Representatives.
    (g) Completion Review.--
        (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), not later 
    than 120 days after the date of completion of a report of the Chief 
    of Engineers that recommends to Congress a water resources project, 
    the Secretary shall--
            (A) review the report; and
            (B) provide any recommendations of the Secretary regarding 
        the water resources project to Congress.
        (2) Prior reports.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, with respect to any report of the Chief of 
    Engineers recommending a water resources project that is complete 
    prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
    complete review of, and provide recommendations to Congress for, 
    the report in accordance with paragraph (1).
SEC. 2034. INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW.
    (a) Project Studies Subject to Independent Peer Review.--
        (1) In general.--Project studies shall be subject to a peer 
    review by an independent panel of experts as determined under this 
    section.
        (2) Scope.--The peer review may include a review of the 
    economic and environmental assumptions and projections, project 
    evaluation data, economic analyses, environmental analyses, 
    engineering analyses, formulation of alternative plans, methods for 
    integrating risk and uncertainty, models used in evaluation of 
    economic or environmental impacts of proposed projects, and any 
    biological opinions of the project study.
        (3) Project studies subject to peer review.--
            (A) Mandatory.--A project study shall be subject to peer 
        review under paragraph (1) if--
                (i) the project has an estimated total cost of more 
            than $45,000,000, including mitigation costs, and is not 
            determined by the Chief of Engineers to be exempt from peer 
            review under paragraph (6);
                (ii) the Governor of an affected State requests a peer 
            review by an independent panel of experts; or
                (iii) the Chief of Engineers determines that the 
            project study is controversial considering the factors set 
            forth in paragraph (4).
            (B) Discretionary.--
                (i) Agency request.--A project study shall be 
            considered by the Chief of Engineers for peer review under 
            this section if the head of a Federal or State agency 
            charged with reviewing the project study determines that 
            the project is likely to have a significant adverse impact 
            on environmental, cultural, or other resources under the 
            jurisdiction of the agency after implementation of proposed 
            mitigation plans and requests a peer review by an 
            independent panel of experts.
                (ii) Deadline for decision.--A decision of the Chief of 
            Engineers under this subparagraph whether to conduct a peer 
            review shall be made within 21 days of the date of receipt 
            of the request by the head of the Federal or State agency 
            under clause (i).
                (iii) Reasons for not conducting peer review.--If the 
            Chief of Engineers decides not to conduct a peer review 
            following a request under clause (i), the Chief shall make 
            publicly available, including on the Internet, the reasons 
            for not conducting the peer review.
                (iv) Appeal to chairman of council on environmental 
            quality.--A decision by the Chief of Engineers not to 
            conduct a peer review following a request under clause (i) 
            shall be subject to appeal by a person referred to in 
            clause (i) to the Chairman of the Council on Environmental 
            Quality if such appeal is made within the 30-day period 
            following the date of the decision being made available 
            under clause (iii). A decision of the Chairman on an appeal 
            under this clause shall be made within 30 days of the date 
            of the appeal.
        (4) Factors to consider.--In determining whether a project 
    study is controversial under paragraph (3)(A)(iii), the Chief of 
    Engineers shall consider if--
            (A) there is a significant public dispute as to the size, 
        nature, or effects of the project; or
            (B) there is a significant public dispute as to the 
        economic or environmental costs or benefits of the project.
        (5) Project studies excluded from peer review.--The Chief of 
    Engineers may exclude a project study from peer review under 
    paragraph (1)--
            (A) if the project study does not include an environmental 
        impact statement and is a project study subject to peer review 
        under paragraph (3)(A)(i) that the Chief of Engineers 
        determines--
                (i) is not controversial;
                (ii) has no more than negligible adverse impacts on 
            scarce or unique cultural, historic, or tribal resources;
                (iii) has no substantial adverse impacts on fish and 
            wildlife species and their habitat prior to the 
            implementation of mitigation measures; and
                (iv) has, before implementation of mitigation measures, 
            no more than a negligible adverse impact on a species 
            listed as endangered or threatened species under the 
            Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) or 
            the critical habitat of such species designated under such 
            Act;
            (B) if the project study--
                (i) involves only the rehabilitation or replacement of 
            existing hydropower turbines, lock structures, or flood 
            control gates within the same footprint and for the same 
            purpose as an existing water resources project;
                (ii) is for an activity for which there is ample 
            experience within the Corps of Engineers and industry to 
            treat the activity as being routine; and
                (iii) has minimal life safety risk; or
            (C) if the project study does not include an environmental 
        impact statement and is a project study pursued under section 
        205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), section 
        2 of the Flood Control Act of August 28, 1937 (33 U.S.C. 701g), 
        section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), 
        section 107(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
        577(a)), section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing 
        Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores of 
        publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
        426g), section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 
        U.S.C. 426i), section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
        authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation of 
        certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other 
        purposes'', approved March 2, 1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a), section 
        1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        2309a), or section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act 
        of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
        (6) Determination of total cost.--For purposes of determining 
    the estimated total cost of a project under paragraph (3)(A), the 
    total cost shall be based upon the reasonable estimates of the 
    Chief of Engineers at the completion of the reconnaissance study 
    for the project. If the reasonable estimate of total costs is 
    subsequently determined to be in excess of the amount in paragraph 
    (3)(A), the Chief of Engineers shall make a determination whether a 
    project study is required to be reviewed under this section.
    (b) Timing of Peer Review.--
        (1) In general.--The Chief of Engineers shall determine the 
    timing of a peer review of a project study under subsection (a). In 
    all cases, the peer review shall occur during the period beginning 
    on the date of the signing of the feasibility cost-sharing 
    agreement for the study and ending on the date established under 
    subsection (e)(1)(A) for the peer review and shall be accomplished 
    concurrent with the conducting of the project study.
        (2) Factors to consider.--In any case in which the Chief of 
    Engineers has not initiated a peer review of a project study, the 
    Chief of Engineers shall consider, at a minimum, whether to 
    initiate a peer review at the time that--
            (A) the without-project conditions are identified;
            (B) the array of alternatives to be considered are 
        identified; and
            (C) the preferred alternative is identified.
        (3) Limitation on multiple peer review.--Nothing in this 
    subsection shall be construed to require the Chief of Engineers to 
    conduct multiple peer reviews for a project study.
    (c) Establishment of Panels.--
        (1) In general.--For each project study subject to peer review 
    under subsection (a), as soon as practicable after the Chief of 
    Engineers determines that a project study will be subject to peer 
    review, the Chief of Engineers shall contract with the National 
    Academy of Sciences or a similar independent scientific and 
    technical advisory organization or an eligible organization to 
    establish a panel of experts to conduct a peer review for the 
    project study.
        (2) Membership.--A panel of experts established for a project 
    study under this section shall be composed of independent experts 
    who represent a balance of areas of expertise suitable for the 
    review being conducted.
        (3) Limitation on appointments.--The National Academy of 
    Sciences or any other organization the Chief of Engineers contracts 
    with under paragraph (1) to establish a panel of experts shall 
    apply the National Academy of Science's policy for selecting 
    committee members to ensure that members selected for the panel of 
    experts have no conflict with the project being reviewed.
        (4) Congressional notification.--Upon identification of a 
    project study for peer review under this section, but prior to 
    initiation of the review, the Chief of Engineers shall notify the 
    Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
    Representatives of the review.
    (d) Duties of Panels.--A panel of experts established for a peer 
review for a project study under this section shall--
        (1) conduct the peer review for the project study;
        (2) assess the adequacy and acceptability of the economic, 
    engineering, and environmental methods, models, and analyses used 
    by the Chief of Engineers;
        (3) receive from the Chief of Engineers the public written and 
    oral comments provided to the Chief of Engineers;
        (4) provide timely written and oral comments to the Chief of 
    Engineers throughout the development of the project study, as 
    requested; and
        (5) submit to the Chief of Engineers a final report containing 
    the panel's economic, engineering, and environmental analysis of 
    the project study, including the panel's assessment of the adequacy 
    and acceptability of the economic, engineering, and environmental 
    methods, models, and analyses used by the Chief of Engineers, to 
    accompany the publication of the report of the Chief of Engineers 
    for the project.
    (e) Duration of Project Study Peer Reviews.--
        (1) Deadline.--A panel of experts established under this 
    section shall--
            (A) complete its peer review under this section for a 
        project study and submit a report to the Chief of Engineers 
        under subsection (d)(5) not more than 60 days after the last 
        day of the public comment period for the draft project study, 
        or, if the Chief of Engineers determines that a longer period 
        of time is necessary, such period of time determined necessary 
        by the Chief of Engineers; and
            (B) terminate on the date of initiation of the State and 
        agency review required by the first section of the Flood 
        Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887).
        (2) Failure to meet deadline.--If a panel of experts does not 
    complete its peer review of a project study under this section and 
    submit a report to the Chief of Engineers under subsection (d)(5) 
    on or before the deadline established by paragraph (1) for the peer 
    review, the Chief of Engineers shall complete the project study 
    without delay.
    (f) Recommendations of Panel.--
        (1) Consideration by the chief of engineers.--After receiving a 
    report on a project study from a panel of experts under this 
    section and before entering a final record of decision for the 
    project, the Chief of Engineers shall consider any recommendations 
    contained in the report and prepare a written response for any 
    recommendations adopted or not adopted.
        (2) Public availability and transmittal to congress.--After 
    receiving a report on a project study from a panel of experts under 
    this section, the Chief of Engineers shall--
            (A) make a copy of the report and any written response of 
        the Chief of Engineers on recommendations contained in the 
        report available to the public by electronic means, including 
        the Internet; and
            (B) transmit to the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a copy of the 
        report, together with any such written response, on the date of 
        a final report of the Chief of Engineers or other final 
        decision document for the project study.
    (g) Costs.--
        (1) In general.--The costs of a panel of experts established 
    for a peer review under this section--
            (A) shall be a Federal expense; and
            (B) shall not exceed $500,000.
        (2) Waiver.--The Chief of Engineers may waive the $500,000 
    limitation contained in paragraph (1)(B) in cases that the Chief of 
    Engineers determines appropriate.
    (h) Applicability.--This section shall apply to--
        (1) project studies initiated during the 2-year period 
    preceding the date of enactment of this Act and for which the array 
    of alternatives to be considered has not been identified; and
        (2) project studies initiated during the period beginning on 
    such date of enactment and ending 7 years after such date of 
    enactment.
    (i) Reports.--
        (1) Initial report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of 
    enactment of this section, the Chief of Engineers shall submit to 
    the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
    Representatives a report on the implementation of this section.
        (2) Additional report.--Not later than 6 years after the date 
    of enactment of this section, the Chief of Engineers shall update 
    the report under paragraph (1) taking into account any further 
    information on implementation of this section and submit such 
    updated report to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
    the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
    of the House of Representatives.
    (j) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to a peer review panel established 
under this section.
    (k) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
affect any authority of the Chief of Engineers to cause or conduct a 
peer review of a water resources project existing on the date of 
enactment of this section.
    (l) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
        (1) Project study.--The term ``project study'' means--
            (A) a feasibility study or reevaluation study for a water 
        resources project, including the environmental impact statement 
        prepared for the study; and
            (B) any other study associated with a modification of a 
        water resources project that includes an environmental impact 
        statement, including the environmental impact statement 
        prepared for the study.
        (2) Affected state.--The term ``affected State'', as used with 
    respect to a water resources project, means a State all or a 
    portion of which is within the drainage basin in which the project 
    is or would be located and would be economically or environmentally 
    affected as a consequence of the project.
        (3) Eligible organization.--The term ``eligible organization'' 
    means an organization that--
            (A) is described in section 501(c)(3), and exempt from 
        Federal tax under section 501(a), of the Internal Revenue Code 
        of 1986;
            (B) is independent;
            (C) is free from conflicts of interest;
            (D) does not carry out or advocate for or against Federal 
        water resources projects; and
            (E) has experience in establishing and administering peer 
        review panels.
        (4) Total cost.--The term ``total cost'', as used with respect 
    to a water resources project, means the cost of construction 
    (including planning and designing) of the project. In the case of a 
    project for hurricane and storm damage reduction or flood damage 
    reduction that includes periodic nourishment over the life of the 
    project, the term includes the total cost of the nourishment.
SEC. 2035. SAFETY ASSURANCE REVIEW.
    (a) Projects Subject to Safety Assurance Review.--The Chief of 
Engineers shall ensure that the design and construction activities for 
hurricane and storm damage reduction and flood damage reduction 
projects are reviewed by independent experts under this section if the 
Chief of Engineers determines that a review by independent experts is 
necessary to assure public health, safety, and welfare.
    (b) Factors.--In determining whether a review of design and 
construction of a project is necessary under this section, the Chief of 
Engineers shall consider whether--
        (1) the failure of the project would pose a significant threat 
    to human life;
        (2) the project involves the use of innovative materials or 
    techniques;
        (3) the project design lacks redundancy; or
        (4) the project has a unique construction sequencing or a 
    reduced or overlapping design construction schedule.
    (c) Safety Assurance Review.--
        (1) Initiation of review.--At the appropriate point in the 
    development of detailed engineering and design specifications for 
    each water resources project subject to review under this section, 
    the Chief of Engineers shall initiate a safety assurance review by 
    independent experts on the design and construction activities for 
    the project.
        (2) Selection of reviewers.--A safety assurance review under 
    this section shall include participation by experts selected by the 
    Chief of Engineers from among individuals who are distinguished 
    experts in engineering, hydrology, or other appropriate 
    disciplines. The Chief of Engineers shall apply the National 
    Academy of Science's policy for selecting reviewers to ensure that 
    reviewers have no conflict of interest with the project being 
    reviewed.
        (3) Compensation.--An individual serving as an independent 
    reviewer under this section shall be compensated at a rate of pay 
    to be determined by the Secretary and shall be allowed travel 
    expenses.
    (d) Scope of Safety Assurance Reviews.--A safety assurance review 
under this section shall include a review of the design and 
construction activities prior to the initiation of physical 
construction and periodically thereafter until construction activities 
are completed on a regular schedule sufficient to inform the Chief of 
Engineers on the adequacy, appropriateness, and acceptability of the 
design and construction activities for the purpose of assuring public 
health, safety, and welfare. The Chief of Engineers shall ensure that 
reviews under this section do not create any unnecessary delays in 
design and construction activities.
    (e) Safety Assurance Review Record.--The written recommendations of 
a reviewer or panel of reviewers under this section and the responses 
of the Chief of Engineers shall be available to the public, including 
through electronic means on the Internet.
    (f) Applicability.--This section shall apply to any project in 
design or under construction on the date of enactment of this Act and 
to any project with respect to which design or construction is 
initiated during the period beginning on the date of enactment of this 
Act and ending 7 years after such date of enactment.
SEC. 2036. MITIGATION FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE AND WETLANDS LOSSES.
    (a) Mitigation for Fish and Wildlife Losses.--Section 906(d) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(d)) is 
amended--
        (1) in the first sentence of paragraph (1) by striking ``to the 
    Congress'' and inserting ``to Congress in any report, and shall not 
    select a project alternative in any report,'';
        (2) in the second sentence of paragraph (1) by inserting ``, 
    and other habitat types are mitigated to not less than in-kind 
    conditions'' after ``mitigated in-kind''; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(3) Mitigation requirements.--
            ``(A) In general.--To mitigate losses to flood damage 
        reduction capabilities and fish and wildlife resulting from a 
        water resources project, the Secretary shall ensure that the 
        mitigation plan for each water resources project complies with 
        the mitigation standards and policies established pursuant to 
        the regulatory programs administered by the Secretary.
            ``(B) Inclusions.--A specific mitigation plan for a water 
        resources project under paragraph (1) shall include, at a 
        minimum--
                ``(i) a plan for monitoring the implementation and 
            ecological success of each mitigation measure, including 
            the cost and duration of any monitoring, and, to the extent 
            practicable, a designation of the entities that will be 
            responsible for the monitoring;
                ``(ii) the criteria for ecological success by which the 
            mitigation will be evaluated and determined to be 
            successful based on replacement of lost functions and 
            values of the habitat, including hydrologic and vegetative 
            characteristics;
                ``(iii) a description of the land and interests in land 
            to be acquired for the mitigation plan and the basis for a 
            determination that the land and interests are available for 
            acquisition;
                ``(iv) a description of--

                    ``(I) the types and amount of restoration 
                activities to be conducted;
                    ``(II) the physical action to be undertaken to 
                achieve the mitigation objectives within the watershed 
                in which such losses occur and, in any case in which 
                the mitigation will occur outside the watershed, a 
                detailed explanation for undertaking the mitigation 
                outside the watershed; and
                    ``(III) the functions and values that will result 
                from the mitigation plan; and

                ``(v) a contingency plan for taking corrective actions 
            in cases in which monitoring demonstrates that mitigation 
            measures are not achieving ecological success in accordance 
            with criteria under clause (ii).
            ``(C) Responsibility for monitoring.--In any case in which 
        it is not practicable to identify in a mitigation plan for a 
        water resources project the entity responsible for monitoring 
        at the time of a final report of the Chief of Engineers or 
        other final decision document for the project, such entity 
        shall be identified in the partnership agreement entered into 
        with the non-Federal interest under section 221 of Flood 
        Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b).
        ``(4) Determination of success.--
            ``(A) In general.--A mitigation plan under this subsection 
        shall be considered to be successful at the time at which the 
        criteria under paragraph (3)(B)(ii) are achieved under the 
        plan, as determined by monitoring under paragraph (3)(B)(i).
            ``(B) Consultation.--In determining whether a mitigation 
        plan is successful under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall 
        consult annually with appropriate Federal agencies and each 
        State in which the applicable project is located on at least 
        the following:
                ``(i) The ecological success of the mitigation as of 
            the date on which the report is submitted.
                ``(ii) The likelihood that the mitigation will achieve 
            ecological success, as defined in the mitigation plan.
                ``(iii) The projected timeline for achieving that 
            success.
                ``(iv) Any recommendations for improving the likelihood 
            of success.
        ``(5) Monitoring.--Mitigation monitoring shall continue until 
    it has been demonstrated that the mitigation has met the ecological 
    success criteria.''.
    (b) Status Report.--
        (1) In general.--Concurrent with the President's submission to 
    Congress of the President's request for appropriations for the 
    Civil Works Program for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit 
    to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
    of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
    Works of the Senate a report on the status of construction of 
    projects that require mitigation under section 906 of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283), the status of 
    such mitigation, and the results of the consultation under 
    subsection (d)(4)(B) of such section.
        (2) Projects included.--The status report shall include the 
    status of--
            (A) all projects that are under construction as of the date 
        of the report;
            (B) all projects for which the President requests funding 
        for the next fiscal year; and
            (C) all projects that have undergone or completed 
        construction, but have not completed the mitigation required 
        under section 906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1986.
        (3) Availability of information.--The Secretary shall make 
    information contained in the status report available to the public, 
    including on the Internet.
    (c) Wetlands Mitigation.--
        (1) In general.--In carrying out a water resources project that 
    involves wetlands mitigation and that has impacts that occur within 
    the service area of a mitigation bank, the Secretary, where 
    appropriate, shall first consider the use of the mitigation bank if 
    the bank contains sufficient available credits to offset the impact 
    and the bank is approved in accordance with the Federal Guidance 
    for the Establishment, Use and Operation of Mitigation Banks (60 
    Fed. Reg. 58605) or other applicable Federal law (including 
    regulations).
        (2) Service area.--To the maximum extent practicable, the 
    service area of the mitigation bank under paragraph (1) shall be in 
    the same watershed as the affected habitat.
        (3) Responsibility for monitoring.--
            (A) In general.--Purchase of credits from a mitigation bank 
        for a water resources project relieves the Secretary and the 
        non-Federal interest from responsibility for monitoring or 
        demonstrating mitigation success.
            (B) Applicability.--The relief of responsibility under 
        subparagraph (A) applies only in any case in which the 
        Secretary determines that monitoring of mitigation success is 
        being conducted by the Secretary or by the owner or operator of 
        the mitigation bank.
SEC. 2037. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT.
    (a) In General.--Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326) is amended to read as follows:
    ``SEC. 204. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT.
    ``(a) In General.--
        ``(1) Sediment use.--For sediment obtained through the 
    construction, operation, or maintenance of an authorized Federal 
    water resources project, the Secretary shall develop, at Federal 
    expense, regional sediment management plans and carry out projects 
    at locations identified in plans developed under this section, or 
    identified jointly by the non-Federal interest and the Secretary, 
    for use in the construction, repair, modification, or 
    rehabilitation of projects associated with Federal water resources 
    projects for purposes listed in paragraph (3).
        ``(2) Cooperation.--The Secretary shall develop plans under 
    this subsection in cooperation with the appropriate Federal, State, 
    regional, and local agencies.
        ``(3) Purposes for sediment use in projects.--The purposes of 
    using sediment for the construction, repair, modification, or 
    rehabilitation of Federal water resources projects are--
            ``(A) to reduce storm damage to property;
            ``(B) to protect, restore, and create aquatic and 
        ecologically related habitats, including wetlands; and
            ``(C) to transport and place suitable sediment.
    ``(b) Secretarial Findings.--Subject to subsection (c), projects 
carried out under subsection (a) may be carried out in any case in 
which the Secretary finds that--
        ``(1) the environmental, economic, and social benefits of the 
    project, both monetary and nonmonetary, justify the cost of the 
    project; and
        ``(2) the project will not result in environmental degradation.
    ``(c) Determination of Project Costs.--
        ``(1) Costs of construction.--
            ``(A) In general.--Costs associated with construction of a 
        project under this section or identified in a regional sediment 
        management plan shall be limited solely to construction costs 
        that are in excess of the costs necessary to carry out the 
        dredging for construction, operation, or maintenance of an 
        authorized Federal water resources project in the most cost-
        effective way, consistent with economic, engineering, and 
        environmental criteria.
            ``(B) Cost sharing.--
                ``(i) In general.--Except as provided in clause (ii), 
            the non-Federal share of the construction cost of a project 
            under this section shall be determined as provided in 
            subsections (a) through (d) of section 103 of the Water 
            Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213).
                ``(ii) Special rule.--Construction of a project under 
            this section for one or more of the purposes of protection, 
            restoration, or creation of aquatic and ecologically 
            related habitat, the cost of which does not exceed $750,000 
            and which is located in a disadvantaged community as 
            determined by the Secretary, may be carried out at Federal 
            expense.
            ``(C) Total cost.--The total Federal costs associated with 
        construction of a project under this section may not exceed 
        $5,000,000.
        ``(2) Operation, maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation 
    costs.--Operation, maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation 
    costs associated with a project under this section are the 
    responsibility of the non-Federal interest.
    ``(d) Selection of Dredged Material Disposal Method for 
Environmental Purposes.--
        ``(1) In general.--In developing and carrying out a Federal 
    water resources project involving the disposal of dredged material, 
    the Secretary may select, with the consent of the non-Federal 
    interest, a disposal method that is not the least cost option if 
    the Secretary determines that the incremental costs of the disposal 
    method are reasonable in relation to the environmental benefits, 
    including the benefits to the aquatic environment to be derived 
    from the creation of wetlands and control of shoreline erosion.
        ``(2) Federal share.--The Federal share of such incremental 
    costs shall be determined in accordance with subsection (c).
    ``(e) State and Regional Plans.--The Secretary may--
        ``(1) cooperate with any State in the preparation of a 
    comprehensive State or regional sediment management plan within the 
    boundaries of the State;
        ``(2) encourage State participation in the implementation of 
    the plan; and
        ``(3) submit to Congress reports and recommendations with 
    respect to appropriate Federal participation in carrying out the 
    plan.
    ``(f) Priority Areas.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall give priority to a regional sediment management project in the 
vicinity of each of the following:
        ``(1) Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Arkansas.
        ``(2) Fletcher Cove, California.
        ``(3) Egmont Key, Florida.
        ``(4) Calcasieu Ship Channel, Louisiana.
        ``(5) Delaware River Estuary, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
        ``(6) Fire Island Inlet, Suffolk County, New York.
        ``(7) Smith Point Park Pavilion and the TWA Flight 800 
    Memorial, Brookhaven, New York.
        ``(8) Morehead City, North Carolina.
        ``(9) Toledo Harbor, Lucas County, Ohio.
        ``(10) Galveston Bay, Texas.
        ``(11) Benson Beach, Washington.
    ``(g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000 per fiscal year, of 
which not more than $5,000,000 per fiscal year may be used for the 
development of regional sediment management plans authorized by 
subsection (e) and of which not more than $3,000,000 per fiscal year 
may be used for construction of projects to which subsection 
(c)(1)(B)(ii) applies. Such funds shall remain available until 
expended.''.
    (b) Conforming Repeal.--
        (1) In general.--Section 145 of the Water Resources Development 
    Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j) is repealed.
        (2) Existing projects.--The Secretary may complete any project 
    being carried out under section 145 of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1976 on the day before the date of enactment of 
    this Act.
SEC. 2038. NATIONAL SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.
    (a) In General.--Section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing 
Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly 
owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), is amended 
to read as follows:
``SEC. 3. STORM AND HURRICANE RESTORATION AND IMPACT MINIMIZATION 
PROGRAM.
    ``(a) Construction of Small Shore and Beach Restoration and 
Protection Projects.--
        ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may carry out a program for 
    the construction of small shore and beach restoration and 
    protection projects not specifically authorized by Congress that 
    otherwise comply with the first section of this Act if the 
    Secretary determines that such construction is advisable.
        ``(2) Local cooperation.--The local cooperation requirement of 
    the first section of this Act shall apply to a project under this 
    section.
        ``(3) Completeness.--A project under this subsection--
            ``(A) shall be complete; and
            ``(B) shall not commit the United States to any additional 
        improvement to ensure the successful operation of the project; 
        except for participation in periodic beach nourishment in 
        accordance with--
                ``(i) the first section of this Act; and
                ``(ii) the procedure for projects authorized after 
            submission of a survey report.
    ``(b) National Shoreline Erosion Control Development and 
Demonstration Program.--
        ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct under the 
    program authorized by subsection (a) a national shoreline erosion 
    control development and demonstration program (referred to in this 
    section as the `demonstration program').
        ``(2) Requirements.--
            ``(A) In general.--The demonstration program shall include 
        provisions for--
                ``(i) projects consisting of planning, design, 
            construction, and monitoring of prototype engineered and 
            native and naturalized vegetative shoreline erosion control 
            devices and methods;
                ``(ii) monitoring of the applicable prototypes;
                ``(iii) detailed engineering and environmental reports 
            on the results of each project carried out under the 
            demonstraton program; and
                ``(iv) technology transfers, as appropriate, to private 
            property owners, State and local entities, nonprofit 
            educational institutions, and nongovernmental 
            organizations.
            ``(B) Determination of feasibility.--A project under the 
        demonstration program shall not be carried out until the 
        Secretary determines that the project is feasible.
            ``(C) Emphasis.--A project under the demonstration program 
        shall emphasize, to the maximum extent practicable--
                ``(i) the development and demonstration of innovative 
            technologies;
                ``(ii) efficient designs to prevent erosion at a 
            shoreline site, taking into account the lifecycle cost of 
            the design, including cleanup, maintenance, and 
            amortization;
                ``(iii) new and enhanced shore protection project 
            design and project formulation tools the purposes of which 
            are to improve the physical performance, and lower the 
            lifecycle costs, of the projects;
                ``(iv) natural designs, including the use of native and 
            naturalized vegetation or temporary structures that 
            minimize permanent structural alterations to the shoreline;
                ``(v) the avoidance of negative impacts to adjacent 
            shorefront communities;
                ``(vi) in areas with substantial residential or 
            commercial interests located adjacent to the shoreline, 
            designs that do not impair the aesthetic appeal of the 
            interests;
                ``(vii) the potential for long-term protection afforded 
            by the technology; and
                ``(viii) recommendations developed from evaluations of 
            the program established under the Shoreline Erosion Control 
            Demonstration Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962-5 note), 
            including--

                    ``(I) adequate consideration of the subgrade;
                    ``(II) proper filtration;
                    ``(III) durable components;
                    ``(IV) adequate connection between units; and
                    ``(V) consideration of additional relevant 
                information.

            ``(D) Sites.--
                ``(i) In general.--Each project under the demonstration 
            program may be carried out at--

                    ``(I) a privately owned site with substantial 
                public access; or
                    ``(II) a publicly owned site on open coast or in 
                tidal waters.

                ``(ii) Selection.--The Secretary shall develop criteria 
            for the selection of sites for projects under the 
            demonstration program, including criteria based on--

                    ``(I) a variety of geographic and climatic 
                conditions;
                    ``(II) the size of the population that is dependent 
                on the beaches for recreation or the protection of 
                private property or public infrastructure;
                    ``(III) the rate of erosion;
                    ``(IV) significant natural resources or habitats 
                and environmentally sensitive areas; and
                    ``(V) significant threatened historic structures or 
                landmarks.

        ``(3) Consultation.--The Secretary shall carry out the 
    demonstration program in consultation with--
            ``(A) the Secretary of Agriculture, particularly with 
        respect to native and naturalized vegetative means of 
        preventing and controlling shoreline erosion;
            ``(B) Federal, State, and local agencies;
            ``(C) private organizations;
            ``(D) the Coastal Engineering Research Center established 
        by the first section of Public Law 88-172 (33 U.S.C. 426-1); 
        and
            ``(E) applicable university research facilities.
        ``(4) Completion of demonstration.--After carrying out the 
    initial construction and evaluation of the performance and cost of 
    a project under the demonstration program, the Secretary may--
            ``(A) amend, at the request of a non-Federal interest of 
        the project, the partnership agreement for a federally 
        authorized shore protection project in existence on the date on 
        which initial construction of the project under the 
        demonstration program is complete to incorporate the project 
        constructed under the demonstration program as a feature of the 
        shore protection project, with the future cost sharing of the 
        project constructed under the demonstration program to be 
        determined by the project purposes of the shore protection 
        project; or
            ``(B) transfer all interest in and responsibility for the 
        completed project constructed under the demonstration program 
        to a non-Federal interest or another Federal agency.
        ``(5) Agreements.--The Secretary may enter into a partnership 
    agreement with the non-Federal interest or a cooperative agreement 
    with the head of another Federal agency under the demonstration 
    program--
            ``(A) to share the costs of construction, operation, 
        maintenance, and monitoring of a project under the 
        demonstration program;
            ``(B) to share the costs of removing the project, or 
        element of the project if the Secretary determines that the 
        project or element of the project is detrimental to public or 
        private property, public infrastructure, or public safety; or
            ``(C) to specify ownership of the completed project if the 
        Secretary determines that the completed project will not be 
        part of a Corps of Engineers project.
        ``(6) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2008, and every 3 
    years thereafter, the Secretary shall prepare and submit to the 
    Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
    Representatives a report describing--
            ``(A) the activities carried out and accomplishments made 
        under the demonstration program since the previous report under 
        this paragraph; and
            ``(B) any recommendations of the Secretary relating to the 
        program.
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--
        ``(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary may 
    expend, from any appropriations made available to the Secretary for 
    the purpose of carrying out civil works, not more than $30,000,000 
    during any fiscal year to pay the Federal share of the costs of 
    construction of small shore and beach restoration and protection 
    projects or small projects under this section.
        ``(2) Limitation.--The total amount expended for a project 
    under this section shall--
            ``(A) be sufficient to pay the cost of Federal 
        participation in the project (including periodic nourishment as 
        provided for under the first section of this Act), as 
        determined by the Secretary; and
            ``(B) be not more than $5,000,000.''.
    (b) Repeal.--Section 5 the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing 
Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly 
owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426h), is 
repealed.
SEC. 2039. MONITORING ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.
    (a) In General.--In conducting a feasibility study for a project 
(or a component of a project) for ecosystem restoration, the Secretary 
shall ensure that the recommended project includes, as an integral part 
of the project, a plan for monitoring the success of the ecosystem 
restoration.
    (b) Monitoring Plan.--The monitoring plan shall--
        (1) include a description of the monitoring activities to be 
    carried out, the criteria for ecosystem restoration success, and 
    the estimated cost and duration of the monitoring; and
        (2) specify that the monitoring shall continue until such time 
    as the Secretary determines that the criteria for ecosystem 
    restoration success will be met.
    (c) Cost Share.--For a period of 10 years from completion of 
construction of a project (or a component of a project) for ecosystem 
restoration, the Secretary shall consider the cost of carrying out the 
monitoring as a project cost. If the monitoring plan under subsection 
(b) requires monitoring beyond the 10-year period, the cost of 
monitoring shall be a non-Federal responsibility.
SEC. 2040. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PERMIT APPLICATIONS.
    (a) In General.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall implement a program to allow 
electronic submission of permit applications for permits under the 
jurisdiction of the Secretary.
    (b) Limitations.--This section does not preclude the submission of 
a physical copy.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000.
SEC. 2041. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION.
    (a) Project Tracking.--The Secretary shall assign a unique tracking 
number to each water resources project under the jurisdiction of the 
Secretary to be used by each Federal agency throughout the life of the 
project.
    (b) Report Repository.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall provide to the Library of 
    Congress a copy of each final feasibility study, final 
    environmental impact statement, final reevaluation report, record 
    of decision, and report to Congress prepared by the Corps of 
    Engineers.
        (2) Availability to public.--Each document described in 
    paragraph (1) shall be made available to the public, and an 
    electronic copy of each document shall be made permanently 
    available to the public through the Internet.
SEC. 2042. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION.
    Sections 101, 106, and 108 of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103; 119 Stat. 2252-2254), are 
repealed.
SEC. 2043. STUDIES AND REPORTS FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS.
    (a) Studies.--
        (1) Cost-sharing requirements.--Section 105(a) of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215(a)) is amended by 
    adding at the end the following:
        ``(3) Detailed project reports.--The requirements of this 
    subsection that apply to a feasibility study also shall apply to a 
    study that results in a detailed project report, except that--
            ``(A) the first $100,000 of the costs of a study that 
        results in a detailed project report shall be a Federal 
        expense; and
            ``(B) paragraph (1)(C)(ii) shall not apply to such a 
        study.''.
        (2) Planning and engineering.--Section 105(b) of such Act (33 
    U.S.C. 2215(b)) is amended by striking ``authorized by this Act''.
        (3) Definitions.--Section 105 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 2215) is 
    amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions 
apply:
        ``(1) Detailed project report.--The term `detailed project 
    report' means a report for a project not specifically authorized by 
    Congress in law or otherwise that determines the feasibility of the 
    project with a level of detail appropriate to the scope and 
    complexity of the recommended solution and sufficient to proceed 
    directly to the preparation of contract plans and specifications. 
    The term includes any associated environmental impact statement and 
    mitigation plan. For a project for which the Federal cost does not 
    exceed $1,000,000, the term includes a planning and design analysis 
    document.
        ``(2) Feasibility study.--The term `feasibility study' means a 
    study that results in a feasibility report under section 905, and 
    any associated environmental impact statement and mitigation plan, 
    prepared by the Corps of Engineers for a water resources project. 
    The term includes a study that results in a project implementation 
    report prepared under title VI of the Water Resources Development 
    Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680-2694), a general reevaluation report, 
    and a limited reevaluation report.''.
    (b) Reports.--
        (1) Preparation.--Section 905(a) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282(a)) is amended--
            (A) by striking ``(a) In the case of any'' and inserting 
        the following:
    ``(a) Preparation of Reports.--
        ``(1) In general.--In the case of any'';
            (B) by striking ``the Secretary, the Secretary shall'' and 
        inserting ``the Secretary that results in recommendations 
        concerning a project or the operation of a project and that 
        requires specific authorization by Congress in law or 
        otherwise, the Secretary shall perform a reconnaissance study 
        and'';
            (C) by striking ``Such feasibility report'' and inserting 
        the following:
        ``(2) Contents of feasibility reports.--A feasibility report'';
            (D) by striking ``The feasibility report'' and inserting 
        ``A feasibility report''; and
            (E) by striking the last sentence and inserting the 
        following:
        ``(3) Applicability.--This subsection shall not apply to--
            ``(A) any study with respect to which a report has been 
        submitted to Congress before the date of enactment of this Act;
            ``(B) any study for a project, which project is authorized 
        for construction by this Act and is not subject to section 
        903(b);
            ``(C) any study for a project which does not require 
        specific authorization by Congress in law or otherwise; and
            ``(D) general studies not intended to lead to 
        recommendation of a specific water resources project.
        ``(4) Feasibility report defined.--In this subsection, the term 
    `feasibility report' means each feasibility report, and any 
    associated environmental impact statement and mitigation plan, 
    prepared by the Corps of Engineers for a water resources project. 
    The term includes a project implementation report prepared under 
    title VI of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
    2680-2694), a general reevaluation report, and a limited 
    reevaluation report.''.
        (2) Projects not specifically authorized by congress.--Section 
    905 of such Act is further amended--
            (A) in subsection (b) by inserting ``Reconnaissance 
        Studies.--'' before ``Before initiating'';
            (B) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) as 
        subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively;
            (C) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress.--In the 
case of any water resources project-related study authorized to be 
undertaken by the Secretary without specific authorization by Congress 
in law or otherwise, the Secretary shall prepare a detailed project 
report.'';
            (D) in subsection (d) (as so redesignated) by inserting 
        ``Indian Tribes.--'' before ``For purposes of''; and
            (E) in subsection (e) (as so redesignated) by inserting 
        ``Standard and Uniform Procedures and Practices.--'' before 
        ``The Secretary shall''.
SEC. 2044. COORDINATION AND SCHEDULING OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL 
ACTIONS.
    (a) Notice of Intent.--Upon request of the non-Federal interest in 
the form of a written notice of intent to construct or modify a non-
Federal water supply, wastewater infrastructure, flood damage 
reduction, storm damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, or navigation 
project that requires the approval of the Secretary, the Secretary 
shall initiate, subject to subsection (c), procedures to establish a 
schedule for consolidating Federal, State, and local agency and Indian 
tribe environmental assessments, project reviews, and issuance of all 
permits for the construction or modification of the project. All States 
and Indian tribes having jurisdiction over the proposed project shall 
be invited by the Secretary, but shall not be required, to participate 
in carrying out this section with respect to the project.
    (b) Coordination.--The Secretary shall seek, to the extent 
practicable, to consolidate hearing and comment periods, procedures for 
data collection and report preparation, and the environmental review 
and permitting processes associated with the project and related 
activities. The Secretary shall notify, to the extent possible, the 
non-Federal interest of its responsibilities for data development and 
information that may be necessary to process each permit required for 
the project, including a schedule when the information and data should 
be provided to the appropriate Federal, State, or local agency or 
Indian tribe.
    (c) Costs of Coordination.--The costs incurred by the Secretary to 
establish and carry out a schedule to consolidate Federal, State, and 
local agency and Indian tribe environmental assessments, project 
reviews, and permit issuance for a project under this section shall be 
paid by the non-Federal interest.
    (d) Report on Timesavings Methods.--Not later than 3 years after 
the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall prepare and 
transmit to Congress a report estimating the time required for the 
issuance of all Federal, State, local, and tribal permits for the 
construction of non-Federal projects for water supply, wastewater 
infrastructure, flood damage reduction, storm damage reduction, 
ecosystem restoration, and navigation.
SEC. 2045. PROJECT STREAMLINING.
    (a) Policy.--The benefits of water resources projects are important 
to the Nation's economy and environment, and recommendations to 
Congress regarding such projects should not be delayed due to 
uncoordinated or inefficient reviews or the failure to timely resolve 
disputes during the development of water resources projects.
    (b) Scope.--This section shall apply to each study initiated after 
the date of enactment of this Act to develop a feasibility report under 
section 905 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2282), or a reevaluation report, for a water resources project if the 
Secretary determines that such study requires an environmental impact 
statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (c) Water Resources Project Review Process.--The Secretary shall 
develop and implement a coordinated review process for the development 
of water resources projects.
    (d) Coordinated Reviews.--The coordinated review process under this 
section may provide that all reviews, analyses, opinions, permits, 
licenses, and approvals that must be issued or made by a Federal, 
State, or local government agency or Indian tribe for the development 
of a water resources project described in subsection (b) will be 
conducted, to the maximum extent practicable, concurrently and 
completed within a time period established by the Secretary in 
cooperation with the agencies identified under subsection (e) with 
respect to the project.
    (e) Identification of Jurisdictional Agencies.--With respect to the 
development of each water resources project, the Secretary shall 
identify, as soon as practicable, all Federal, State, and local 
government agencies and Indian tribes that may--
        (1) have jurisdiction over the project;
        (2) be required by law to conduct or issue a review, analysis, 
    or opinion for the project; or
        (3) be required to make a determination on issuing a permit, 
    license, or approval for the project.
    (f) State Authority.--If the coordinated review process is being 
implemented under this section by the Secretary with respect to the 
development of a water resources project described in subsection (b) 
within the boundaries of a State, the State, consistent with State law, 
may choose to participate in the process and to make subject to the 
process all State agencies that--
        (1) have jurisdiction over the project;
        (2) are required to conduct or issue a review, analysis, or 
    opinion for the project; or
        (3) are required to make a determination on issuing a permit, 
    license, or approval for the project.
    (g) Memorandum of Understanding.--The coordinated review process 
developed under this section may be incorporated into a memorandum of 
understanding for a water resources project between the Secretary, the 
heads of Federal, State, and local government agencies, Indian tribes 
identified under subsection (e), and the non-Federal interest for the 
project.
    (h) Effect of Failure to Meet Deadline.--
        (1) Notification.--If the Secretary determines that a Federal, 
    State, or local government agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal 
    interest that is participating in the coordinated review process 
    under this section with respect to the development of a water 
    resources project has not met a deadline established under 
    subsection (d) for the project, the Secretary shall notify, within 
    30 days of the date of such determination, the agency, Indian 
    tribe, or non-Federal interest about the failure to meet the 
    deadline.
        (2) Agency report.--Not later than 30 days after the date of 
    receipt of a notice under paragraph (1), the Federal, State, or 
    local government agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal interest 
    involved may submit a report to the Secretary, explaining why the 
    agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal interest did not meet the 
    deadline and what actions it intends to take to complete or issue 
    the required review, analysis, or opinion or determination on 
    issuing a permit, license, or approval.
        (3) Report to congress.--Not later than 30 days after the date 
    of receipt of a report under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall 
    compile and submit a report to the Committee on Transportation and 
    Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the Committee on 
    Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and the Council on 
    Environmental Quality, describing any deadlines identified in 
    paragraph (1), and any information provided to the Secretary by the 
    Federal, State, or local government agency, Indian tribe, or non-
    Federal interest involved under paragraph (2).
    (i) Limitations.--Nothing in this section shall preempt or 
interfere with--
        (1) any statutory requirement for seeking public comment;
        (2) any power, jurisdiction, or authority that a Federal, 
    State, or local government agency, Indian tribe, or non-Federal 
    interest has with respect to carrying out a water resources 
    project; or
        (3) any obligation to comply with the provisions of the 
    National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the regulations 
    issued by the Council on Environmental Quality to carry out such 
    Act.
SEC. 2046. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATION.
    Section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)) is amended--
        (1) in the first sentence--
            (A) by striking ``two years'' and inserting ``year''; and
            (B) by striking ``7'' and inserting ``5'';
        (2) in the last sentence by striking ``30 months after the 
    date'' and inserting ``the last date of the fiscal year following 
    the fiscal year in which''; and
        (3) in the last sentence by striking ``such 30 month period'' 
    and inserting ``such period''.
SEC. 2047. FEDERAL HOPPER DREDGES.
    (a) Hopper Dredge Mcfarland.--Section 563 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3784) is amended to read as follows:
    ``SEC. 563. HOPPER DREDGE MCFARLAND.
    ``(a) Placement in Ready Reserve Status.--Not before October 1, 
2009, and not after December 31, 2009, the Secretary shall--
        ``(1) place the Federal hopper dredge McFarland (referred to in 
    this section as the `vessel') in a ready reserve status; and
        ``(2) use the vessel solely for urgent and emergency purposes 
    in accordance with existing emergency response protocols.
    ``(b) Routine Tests and Maintenance.--
        ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall periodically perform 
    routine underway dredging tests of the equipment (not to exceed 70 
    days per year) of the vessel in a ready reserve status to ensure 
    the ability of the vessel to perform urgent and emergency work.
        ``(2) Maintenance.--The Secretary--
            ``(A) shall not assign any scheduled hopper dredging work 
        to the vessel other than dredging tests in the Delaware River 
        and Bay; but
            ``(B) shall perform any repairs, including any asbestos 
        abatement, necessary to maintain the vessel in a ready reserve 
        fully operational condition.
    ``(c) Active Status for Dredging.--The Secretary, in consultation 
with affected stakeholders, shall place the vessel in active status in 
order to perform dredging work if the Secretary determines that private 
industry has failed--
        ``(1) to submit a responsive and responsible bid for work 
    advertised by the Secretary; or
        ``(2) to carry out a project as required pursuant to a contract 
    between the industry and the Secretary.''.
    (b) Hopper Dredges Essayons and Yaquina.--Section 3(c)(7)(B) of the 
Act of August 11, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 622; 25 Stat. 423), is amended by 
adding at the end the following: ``This subparagraph shall not apply to 
the Federal hopper dredges Essayons and Yaquina of the Corps of 
Engineers.''.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 3001. BLACK WARRIOR-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALABAMA.
    Section 111 of title I of division C of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2005 (118 Stat. 2944) is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``SEC. 111. BLACK WARRIOR-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALABAMA.
    ``(a) Construction of New Facilities.--
        ``(1) Definitions.--In this subsection, the following 
    definitions apply:
            ``(A) Existing facility.--The term `existing facility' 
        means the administrative and maintenance facility for the 
        project for Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers, Alabama, authorized 
        by the first section of the River and Harbor Appropriations Act 
        of July 5, 1884 (24 Stat. 141), in existence on the date of 
        enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007.
            ``(B) Parcel.--The term `Parcel' means the land owned by 
        the Corps of Engineers serving as the operations and 
        maintenance facility of the Corps of Engineers in the city of 
        Tuscaloosa, Alabama, in existence on the date of enactment of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 2007.
        ``(2) Authorization.--In carrying out the project for Black 
    Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers, Alabama, the Secretary is authorized, at 
    Federal expense--
            ``(A) to purchase land on which the Secretary may construct 
        a new maintenance facility for the project, to be located--
                ``(i) at a different location from the existing 
            facility; and
                ``(ii) in the vicinity of the city of Tuscaloosa, 
            Alabama;
            ``(B) at any time during or after the completion of (and 
        relocation to) the new maintenance facility, to demolish the 
        existing facility; and
            ``(C) to construct on the Parcel a new administrative 
        facility for the project.
    ``(b) Acquisition and Disposition of Property.--The Secretary--
        ``(1) may acquire any real property necessary for the 
    construction of the new maintenance facility under subsection 
    (a)(2)(A); and
        ``(2) shall convey to the city of Tuscaloosa fee simple title 
    in and to any portion of the Parcel not required for construction 
    of the new administrative facility under subsection (a)(2)(C) 
    through--
            ``(A) sale at fair market value;
            ``(B) exchange for city of Tuscaloosa owned land on an 
        acre-for-acre basis; or
            ``(C) any combination of a sale under subparagraph (A) and 
        an exchange under subparagraph (B).
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $32,000,000.''.
SEC. 3002. COOK INLET, ALASKA.
    Section 118(a)(3) of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 2005 (title I of division C of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2005; 118 Stat. 2945) is amended by inserting ``as 
part of the operation and maintenance of such project modification'' 
after ``by the Secretary''.
SEC. 3003. KING COVE HARBOR, ALASKA.
    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for navigation, King Cove Harbor, Alaska, being carried out 
under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
shall be $8,000,000.
SEC. 3004. SEWARD HARBOR, ALASKA.
    The project for navigation, Seward Harbor, Alaska, authorized by 
section 101(a)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 274), is modified to authorize the Secretary to extend the 
existing breakwater by approximately 215 feet, at a total cost of 
$3,333,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,666,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $667,000.
SEC. 3005. SITKA, ALASKA.
    The Sitka, Alaska, element of the project for navigation, Southeast 
Alaska Harbors of Refuge, Alaska, authorized by section 101(1) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4801), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to take such action as is necessary to correct 
design deficiencies in the Sitka Harbor Breakwater at Federal expense. 
The estimated cost is $6,300,000.
SEC. 3006. TATITLEK, ALASKA.
    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for navigation, Tatitlek, Alaska, being carried out under 
section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), shall 
be $10,000,000.
SEC. 3007. RIO DE FLAG, FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA.
    The project for flood damage reduction, Rio De Flag, Flagstaff, 
Arizona, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2576), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of $54,100,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $35,000,000 and a non-Federal cost of 
$19,100,000.
SEC. 3008. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, ARIZONA.
    The project for flood control, Nogales Wash and tributaries, 
Arizona, authorized by section 101(a)(4) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606) and modified by section 303 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711) and 
section 302 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
2600), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
at a total cost of $25,410,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$22,930,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,480,000.
SEC. 3009. TUCSON DRAINAGE AREA, ARIZONA.
    The project for flood damage reduction, environmental restoration, 
and recreation, Tucson drainage area, Arizona, authorized by section 
101(a)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
274), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
at a total cost of $66,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$43,350,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $23,350,000.
SEC. 3010. OSCEOLA HARBOR, ARKANSAS.
    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Osceola Harbor, 
Arkansas, constructed under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to allow non-Federal interests to 
construct a mooring facility within the existing authorized harbor 
channel, subject to all necessary permits, certifications, and other 
requirements.
    (b) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section 
shall be construed as affecting the responsibility of the Secretary to 
maintain the general navigation features of the project at a bottom 
width of 250 feet.
SEC. 3011. ST. FRANCIS RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI.
    The project for flood control, St. Francis River Basin, Arkansas 
and Missouri, authorized by the Act of June 15, 1936 (49 Stat. 1508), 
is modified to authorize the Secretary to undertake channel 
stabilization and sediment removal measures on the St. Francis River 
and tributaries as a nonseparable element of the original project.
SEC. 3012. PINE MOUNTAIN DAM, ARKANSAS.
    The Pine Mountain Dam feature of the project for flood protection, 
Lee Creek, Arkansas and Oklahoma, authorized by section 204 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1078), is modified--
        (1) to add environmental restoration as a project purpose; and
        (2) to direct the Secretary to finance the non-Federal share of 
    the cost of the project, including treatment and distributions 
    components, over a 30-year period in accordance with section 103(k) 
    of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(k)).
SEC. 3013. RED-OUACHITA RIVER BASIN LEVEES, ARKANSAS AND LOUISIANA.
    (a) In General.--Section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 
Stat. 173) is amended in the matter under the heading ``red-ouachita 
river basin'' by striking ``improvements at Calion, Arkansas'' and 
inserting ``improvements at Calion, Arkansas (including authorization 
for the comprehensive flood-control project for Ouachita River and 
tributaries, incorporating in the project all flood control, drainage, 
and power improvements in the basin above the lower end of the left 
bank Ouachita River levee)''.
    (b) Modification.--Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of August 18, 
1941 (55 Stat. 642), is amended in the second sentence of subsection 
(a) in the matter under the heading ``lower mississippi river'' by 
inserting before the period at the end the following: ``; except that 
the Ouachita River Levees, Louisiana, authorized by the first section 
of the Mississippi River Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 
534), shall remain as a component of the Mississippi River and 
Tributaries Project and afforded operation and maintenance 
responsibilities as provided under section 3 of that Act (45 Stat. 
535)''.
SEC. 3014. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Cache Creek Basin, 
California, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4112), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to mitigate the impacts of the new south levee of the Cache 
Creek settling basin on the storm drainage system of the city of 
Woodland, including all appurtenant features, erosion control measures, 
and environmental protection features.
    (b) Objectives.--Mitigation under subsection (a) shall restore the 
preproject capacity of the city of Woodland to release 1,360 cubic feet 
per second of water to the Yolo Bypass and shall include--
        (1) channel improvements;
        (2) an outlet work through the west levee of the Yolo Bypass; 
    and
        (3) a new low flow cross channel to handle city and county 
    storm drainage and settling basin flows (1,760 cubic feet per 
    second) when the Yolo Bypass is in a low flow condition.
SEC. 3015. CALFED STABILITY PROGRAM, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) Amendments.--Section 103(f)(3) of the Water Supply, 
Reliability, and Environmental Improvement Act (118 Stat. 1695-1696) is 
amended--
        (1) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``within the Delta (as 
    defined in Cal. Water Code Sec. 12220)'';
        (2) by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting the following:
            ``(C) Justification.--
                ``(i) In general.--Notwithstanding section 209 of the 
            Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2), in carrying 
            out levee stability programs and projects pursuant to this 
            paragraph, the Secretary of the Army may determine that the 
            programs and projects are justified by the benefits of the 
            project purposes described in subparagraph (A), and the 
            programs and projects shall require no additional economic 
            justification if the Secretary of the Army further 
            determines that the programs and projects are cost 
            effective.
                ``(ii) Applicability.--Clause (i) shall not apply to 
            any separable element intended to produce benefits that are 
            predominantly unrelated to the project purposes described 
            in subparagraph (A).''; and
        (3) in subparagraph (D)(i) by inserting ``as described in the 
    Record of Decision'' after ``Public Law 84-99 standard)''.
    (b) Additional Authorization of Appropriations.--In addition to 
funds made available pursuant to the Water Supply, Reliability, and 
Environmental Improvement Act (Public Law 108-361) to carry out section 
103(f)(3)(D) of that Act (118 Stat. 1696), there is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out projects described in that section 
$106,000,000, to remain available until expended.
SEC. 3016. COMPTON CREEK, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for flood control, Los Angeles Drainage Area, 
California, authorized by section 101(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4611), is modified to add 
environmental restoration and recreation as project purposes.
SEC. 3017. GRAYSON CREEK/MURDERER'S CREEK, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Grayson Creek/
Murderer's Creek, California, being carried out under section 206 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is 
modified--
        (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
    section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
    toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
    work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before 
    the date of the partnership agreement for the project; and
        (2) to authorize the Secretary to consider national ecosystem 
    restoration benefits in determining the Federal interest in the 
    project.
SEC. 3018. HAMILTON AIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for environmental restoration, Hamilton Airfield, 
California, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to construct the project substantially in accordance with the 
report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 19, 2004, at a total cost 
of $228,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $171,100,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $57,000,000.
SEC. 3019. JOHN F. BALDWIN SHIP CHANNEL AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNEL, 
CALIFORNIA.
    The project for navigation, San Francisco to Stockton, California, 
authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
1091) is modified--
        (1) to provide that the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
    John F. Baldwin Ship Channel and Stockton Ship Channel element of 
    the project may be provided in the form of in-kind services and 
    materials; and
        (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
    section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
    toward the non-Federal share of the cost of such element the cost 
    of planning and design work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
    for such element before the date of an agreement for such planning 
    and design.
SEC. 3020. KAWEAH RIVER, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for flood control, Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, 
California, authorized by section 101(b)(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3658), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project, or provide reimbursement not to exceed 
$800,000, for the costs of any work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest for the project before the date of the project partnership 
agreement.
SEC. 3021. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for navigation, Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, 
California, authorized by section 601(d) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to determine whether maintenance of the project is feasible, 
and if the Secretary determines that maintenance of the project is 
feasible, to carry out such maintenance.
SEC. 3022. LLAGAS CREEK, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, Llagas 
Creek, California, authorized by section 501(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 333), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to carry out the project at a total cost of $105,000,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $65,000,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $40,000,000.
    (b) Special Rule.--In evaluating and implementing the project, the 
Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) if the detailed 
project report evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
necessary to implement the project.
SEC. 3023. MAGPIE CREEK, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) In General.--The project for Magpie Creek, California, 
authorized under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 
U.S.C. 701s), is modified to direct the Secretary to apply the cost-
sharing requirements of section 103(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4085) for the portion of the project 
consisting of land acquisition to preserve and enhance existing 
floodwater storage.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of planning and 
design work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.
    (c) Cost.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended 
for the project referred to in subsection (a) shall be $10,000,000.
SEC. 3024. PACIFIC FLYWAY CENTER, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Pacific Flyway 
Center, Sacramento, California, being carried out under section 206 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to expend $2,000,000 to enhance 
public access to the project.
SEC. 3025. PETALUMA RIVER, PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for flood damage reduction, Petaluma River, Petaluma, 
California, authorized by section 112 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2587), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of $41,500,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $26,975,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $14,525,000.
SEC. 3026. PINOLE CREEK, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for improvement of the quality of the environment, 
Pinole Creek Phase I, California, being carried out under section 1135 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3027. PRADO DAM, CALIFORNIA.
    Upon completion of the modifications to the Prado Dam element of 
the project for flood control, Santa Ana River Mainstem, California, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4113), the Memorandum of Agreement for the Operation 
for Prado Dam for Seasonal Additional Water Conservation between the 
Department of the Army and the Orange County Water District (including 
all the conditions and stipulations in the memorandum) shall remain in 
effect for volumes of water made available prior to such modifications.
SEC. 3028. REDWOOD CITY NAVIGATION CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.
    The Secretary may dredge the Redwood City Navigation Channel, 
California, on an annual basis, to maintain the authorized depth of -30 
feet mean lower low water.
SEC. 3029. SACRAMENTO AND AMERICAN RIVERS FLOOD CONTROL, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) Natomas Levee Features.--
        (1) In general.--The project for flood control and recreation, 
    Sacramento and American Rivers, California (Natomas Levee 
    features), authorized by section 9159 of the Department of Defense 
    Appropriations Act, 1993 (106 Stat. 1944), is modified to direct 
    the Secretary to credit $20,503,000 to the Sacramento Area Flood 
    Control Agency for the nonreimbursed Federal share of costs 
    incurred by the Agency in connection with the project.
        (2) Allocation of credit.--The Secretary shall allocate the 
    amount to be credited pursuant to paragraph (1) toward the non-
    Federal share of such projects as are requested by the Sacramento 
    Area Flood Control Agency.
    (b) Joint Federal Project at Folsom Dam.--
        (1) In general.--The project for flood control, American and 
    Sacramento Rivers, California, authorized by section 101(a)(6)(A) 
    of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 274) and 
    modified by section 128 of the Energy and Water Development 
    Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2259), is modified to authorize 
    the Secretary to construct the auxiliary spillway generally in 
    accordance with the Post Authorization Change Report, American 
    River Watershed Project (Folsom Dam Modification and Folsom Dam 
    Raise Projects), dated March 2007, at a total cost of $683,000,000, 
    with an estimated Federal cost of $444,000,000 and an estimated 
    non-Federal cost of $239,000,000.
        (2) Dam safety.--Nothing in this subsection limits the 
    authority of the Secretary of the Interior to carry out dam safety 
    activities in connection with the auxiliary spillway in accordance 
    with the Bureau of Reclamation safety of dams program.
        (3) Transfer of funds.--
            (A) In general.--The Secretary and the Secretary of the 
        Interior are authorized to transfer between the Department of 
        the Army and the Department of the Interior appropriated 
        amounts and other available funds (including funds contributed 
        by non-Federal interests) for the purpose of planning, design, 
        and construction of the auxiliary spillway.
            (B) Terms and conditions.--Any transfer made pursuant to 
        this subsection shall be subject to such terms and conditions 
        as may be agreed on by the Secretary and the Secretary of the 
        Interior.
SEC. 3030. SACRAMENTO DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for navigation, Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, 
California, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project the cost of planning and design work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3031. SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION, CALIFORNIA.
    Section 202 of the River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 
(88 Stat. 49) is amended by striking ``and the monetary authorization'' 
and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting ``; 
except that the lineal feet in the second phase shall be increased from 
405,000 lineal feet to 485,000 lineal feet.''.
SEC. 3032. SALTON SEA RESTORATION, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
        (1) Salton sea authority.--The term ``Salton Sea Authority'' 
    means the joint powers authority established under the laws of the 
    State by a joint power agreement signed on June 2, 1993.
        (2) Salton sea science office.--The term ``Salton Sea Science 
    Office'' means the office established by the United States 
    Geological Survey and located on the date of enactment of this Act 
    in La Quinta, California.
        (3) State.--The term ``State'' means the State of California.
    (b) Pilot Projects.--
        (1) In general.--
            (A) Review.--The Secretary shall review the plan approved 
        by the State, entitled the ``Salton Sea Ecosystem Restoration 
        Program Preferred Alternative Report and Funding Plan'', and 
        dated May 2007 to determine whether the pilot projects 
        described in the plan are feasible.
            (B) Implementation.--
                (i) In general.--Subject to clause (ii), if the 
            Secretary determines that the pilot projects referred to in 
            subparagraph (A) meet the requirements described in that 
            subparagraph, the Secretary may--

                    (I) enter into an agreement with the State; and
                    (II) in consultation with the Salton Sea Authority 
                and the Salton Sea Science Office, carry out pilot 
                projects for improvement of the environment in the area 
                of the Salton Sea.

                (ii) Requirement.--The Secretary shall be a party to 
            each contract for construction entered into under this 
            subparagraph.
        (2) Local participation.--In prioritizing pilot projects under 
    this section, the Secretary shall--
            (A) consult with the State, the Salton Sea Authority, and 
        the Salton Sea Science Office; and
            (B) take into consideration the priorities of the State and 
        the Salton Sea Authority.
        (3) Cost sharing.--Before carrying out a pilot project under 
    this section, the Secretary shall enter into a written agreement 
    with the State that requires the non-Federal interest for the pilot 
    project to pay 35 percent of the total costs of the pilot project.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out subsection (b) $30,000,000, of which not more 
than $5,000,000 shall be used for any one pilot project under this 
section.
SEC. 3033. SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for flood control, Santa Ana River Mainstem (including 
Santiago Creek, California), authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4113) and modified by 
section 104 of the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1988 
(101 Stat. 1329-111) and section 309 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3713), is further modified to authorize the 
Secretary to carry out the project at a total cost of $1,800,000,000 
and to clarify that the Santa Ana River Interceptor Line is an element 
of the project.
SEC. 3034. SANTA BARBARA STREAMS, LOWER MISSION CREEK, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for flood damage reduction, Santa Barbara streams, 
Lower Mission Creek, California, authorized by section 101(b)(8) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2577), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of 
$30,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $15,000,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $15,000,000.
SEC. 3035. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for navigation, Santa Cruz Harbor, California, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 
300) and modified by section 809 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (100 Stat. 4168) and section 526 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 346), is modified to direct the 
Secretary--
        (1) to renegotiate the memorandum of agreement with the non-
    Federal interest to increase the annual payment to reflect the 
    updated cost of operation and maintenance that is the Federal and 
    non-Federal share as provided by law based on the project purpose; 
    and
        (2) to revise the memorandum of agreement to include terms that 
    revise such payments for inflation.
SEC. 3036. SEVEN OAKS DAM, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for flood control, Santa Ana Mainstem, authorized by 
section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4113) and modified by section 104 of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 1988 (101 Stat. 1329-11), section 
102(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4611), 
and section 311 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3713), is modified to direct the Secretary--
        (1) to include ecosystem restoration benefits in the 
    calculation of benefits for the Seven Oaks Dam, California, portion 
    of the project; and
        (2) to conduct a study of water conservation and water quality 
    at the Seven Oaks Dam.
SEC. 3037. UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Upper 
Guadalupe River, California, authorized by section 101(a)(9) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 275), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project generally in 
accordance with the Upper Guadalupe River Flood Damage Reduction, San 
Jose, California, Limited Reevaluation Report, dated March 2004, at a 
total cost of $256,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$136,700,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $119,300,000.
SEC. 3038. WALNUT CREEK CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Walnut Creek 
Channel, California, being carried out under section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified--
        (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
    section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
    toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
    work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before 
    the date of the partnership agreement for the project; and
        (2) to authorize the Secretary to consider national ecosystem 
    restoration benefits in determining the Federal interest in the 
    project.
SEC. 3039. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE I, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for improvement of the quality of the environment, 
Wildcat/San Pablo Creek Phase I, California, being carried out under 
section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2309a), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance 
with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3040. WILDCAT/SAN PABLO CREEK PHASE II, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Wildcat/San Pablo 
Creek Phase II, California, being carried out under section 206 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project and to authorize the Secretary to 
consider national ecosystem restoration benefits in determining the 
Federal interest in the project.
SEC. 3041. YUBA RIVER BASIN PROJECT, CALIFORNIA.
    The project for flood damage reduction, Yuba River Basin, 
California, authorized by section 101(a)(10) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 275), is modified--
        (1) to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a 
    total cost of $107,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $70,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $37,700,000; and
        (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
    section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
    toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
    work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before 
    the date of the partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3042. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, COLORADO.
    Section 808 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4168) is amended by striking ``agriculture,'' and inserting 
``agriculture, environmental restoration,''.
SEC. 3043. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, 
DELAWARE AND MARYLAND.
    The project for navigation, Intracoastal Waterway, Delaware River 
to Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by the first 
section of the Rivers and Harbors Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 
1030), and section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 
1249), is modified to add recreation as a project purpose.
SEC. 3044. ST. GEORGE'S BRIDGE, DELAWARE.
    Section 102(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 
Stat. 4612) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``The 
Secretary shall assume ownership responsibility for the replacement 
bridge not later than the date on which the construction of the bridge 
is completed and the contractors are released of their responsibility 
by the State. In addition, the Secretary may not carry out any action 
to close or remove the St. George's Bridge, Delaware, without specific 
congressional authorization.''.
SEC. 3045. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.
    (a) Shoreline.--The project for shoreline protection, Brevard 
County, Florida, authorized by section 101(b)(7) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to include the mid-reach as an element of the project from 
the Florida department of environmental protection monuments 75.4 to 
118.3, a distance of approximately 7.6 miles. The restoration work 
shall only be undertaken upon a determination by the Secretary, 
following completion of the general reevaluation report authorized by 
section 418 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
2637), that the shoreline protection is feasible.
    (b) Credit.--Section 310 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 301) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Credit.--After completion of the study, the Secretary may 
credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project for shore protection the cost of nourishment and renourishment 
associated with the project for shore protection incurred by the non-
Federal interest to respond to damages to Brevard County beaches that 
are the result of a Federal navigation project, as determined in the 
final report for the study.''.
SEC. 3046. BROWARD COUNTY AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLORIDA.
    The project for shore protection, Broward County and Hillsboro 
Inlet, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1965 (79 Stat. 1090), and modified by section 311 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 301), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the cost of mitigation construction 
and derelict erosion control structure removal carried out by the non-
Federal interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project.
SEC. 3047. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLORIDA.
    In carrying out the project for navigation, Canaveral Harbor, 
Florida, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 
(76 Stat. 1174), the Secretary shall construct a sediment trap if the 
Secretary determines construction of the sediment trap is feasible.
SEC. 3048. GASPARILLA AND ESTERO ISLANDS, FLORIDA.
    The project for shore protection, Gasparilla and Estero Island 
segments, Lee County, Florida, authorized by section 201 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1073), by Senate Resolution dated 
December 17, 1970, and by House Resolution dated December 15, 1970, and 
modified by section 309 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2602), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3049. LIDO KEY BEACH, SARASOTA, FLORIDA.
    (a) In General.--The project for shore protection, Lido Key Beach, 
Sarasota, Florida, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1819), deauthorized under section 1001(b) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), and 
reauthorized by section 364(2)(A) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 313), is modified to direct the Secretary to 
construct the project substantially in accordance with the report of 
the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost of 
$15,190,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,320,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $5,870,000, and at an estimated total 
cost of $65,000,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of 
the project, with an estimated Federal cost of $30,550,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $34,450,000.
    (b) Construction of Shoreline Protection Projects by Non-Federal 
Interests.--The Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement with 
the non-Federal interest in accordance with section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 426i-1) for the modified 
project.
SEC. 3050. PEANUT ISLAND, FLORIDA.
    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for improvement of the quality of the environment, Peanut 
Island, Palm Beach County, Florida, being carried out under section 
1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) 
shall be $9,750,000.
SEC. 3051. PORT SUTTON, FLORIDA.
    The project for navigation, Port Sutton, Florida, authorized by 
section 101(b)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2577), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the 
project at a total cost of $12,900,000.
SEC. 3052. TAMPA HARBOR-BIG BEND CHANNEL, FLORIDA.
    The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida, 
authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 276) is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, 
in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the cost of planning, design, and construction work carried out 
by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3053. TAMPA HARBOR CUT B, FLORIDA.
    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor, Florida, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 
1818), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct passing 
lanes in an area approximately 3.5 miles long and centered on Tampa 
Harbor Cut B if the Secretary determines that such improvements are 
necessary for navigation safety.
    (b) General Reevaluation Report.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
of the general reevaluation report for Tampa Harbor, Florida, being 
conducted on June 1, 2005, shall be the same percentage as the non-
Federal share of the cost of construction of the project.
    (c) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into a new partnership 
agreement with the non-Federal interest to reflect the cost sharing 
required by subsection (b).
SEC. 3054. ALLATOONA LAKE, GEORGIA.
    (a) Land Exchange.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary may exchange land above 863 feet 
    in elevation at Allatoona Lake, Georgia, identified in the Real 
    Estate Design Memorandum prepared by the Mobile district engineer, 
    April 5, 1996, and approved October 8, 1996, for land on the north 
    side of Allatoona Lake that is required for wildlife management and 
    protection of the water quality and overall environment of 
    Allatoona Lake.
        (2) Terms and conditions.--The basis for all land exchanges 
    under this subsection shall be a fair market appraisal to ensure 
    that land exchanged is of equal value.
    (b) Disposal and Acquisition of Land, Allatoona Lake, Georgia.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary may--
            (A) sell land above 863 feet in elevation at Allatoona 
        Lake, Georgia, identified in the memorandum referred to in 
        subsection (a)(1); and
            (B) use the proceeds of the sale, without further 
        appropriation, to pay costs associated with the purchase of 
        land required for wildlife management and protection of the 
        water quality and overall environment of Allatoona Lake.
        (2) Terms and conditions.--
            (A) Willing sellers.--Land acquired under this subsection 
        shall be by negotiated purchase from willing sellers only.
            (B) Basis.--The basis for all transactions under this 
        subsection shall be a fair market value appraisal acceptable to 
        the Secretary.
            (C) Sharing of costs.--Each purchaser of land under this 
        subsection shall share in the associated costs of the purchase, 
        including surveys and associated fees in accordance with the 
        memorandum referred to in subsection (a)(1).
            (D) Other conditions.--The Secretary may impose on the sale 
        and purchase of land under this subsection such other 
        conditions as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
    (c) Repeal.--Section 325 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4849) is repealed.
SEC. 3055. LATHAM RIVER, GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA.
    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project for improvement of the quality of the environment, Latham 
River, Glynn County, Georgia, being carried out under section 1135 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) shall be 
$6,175,000.
SEC. 3056. DWORSHAK RESERVOIR IMPROVEMENTS, IDAHO.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out additional general 
construction measures to allow for operation at lower pool levels to 
satisfy the recreation mission at Dworshak Dam, Idaho.
    (b) Improvements.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary 
shall provide for appropriate improvements to--
        (1) facilities that are operated by the Corps of Engineers; and
        (2) facilities that, as of the date of enactment of this Act, 
    are leased, permitted, or licensed for use by others.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The Secretary shall carry out this section 
through a cost-sharing program with Idaho State parks and recreation 
department at a total estimated project cost of $5,300,000. 
Notwithstanding section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2313), the Federal share of such cost shall be 75 
percent.
SEC. 3057. LITTLE WOOD RIVER, GOODING, IDAHO.
    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Gooding, Idaho, 
constructed under the emergency conservation work program established 
under the Act of March 31, 1933 (16 U.S.C. 585 et seq.), is modified--
        (1) to direct the Secretary to rehabilitate the Gooding Channel 
    project for the purposes of flood control and ecosystem restoration 
    if the Secretary determines that such rehabilitation is not 
    required as a result of improper operation and maintenance of the 
    project by the non-Federal interest and that the rehabilitation and 
    ecosystem restoration is feasible; and
        (2) to direct the Secretary to plan, design, and construct the 
    project at a total cost of $9,000,000.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--
        (1) In general.--Costs for reconstruction of a project under 
    this section shall be shared by the Secretary and the non-Federal 
    interest in the same percentages as the costs of construction of 
    the original project were shared.
        (2) Operation, maintenance, and repair costs.--The costs of 
    operation, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation of a project 
    carried out under this section shall be a non-Federal 
    responsibility.
    (c) Economic Justification.--Reconstruction efforts and activities 
carried out under this section shall not require economic 
justification.
SEC. 3058. BEARDSTOWN COMMUNITY BOAT HARBOR, BEARDSTOWN, ILLINOIS.
    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Muscooten Bay, 
Illinois River, Beardstown Community Boat Harbor, Beardstown, Illinois, 
constructed under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
U.S.C. 577), is modified--
        (1) to include the channel between the harbor and the Illinois 
    River; and
        (2) to direct the Secretary to enter into a partnership 
    agreement with the city of Beardstown to replace the local 
    cooperation agreement dated August 18, 1983, with the Beardstown 
    Community Park District.
    (b) Terms of Partnership Agreement.--The partnership agreement 
referred to in subsection (a) shall include the same rights and 
responsibilities as the local cooperation agreement dated August 18, 
1983, changing only the identity of the non-Federal sponsor.
    (c) Maintenance.--Following execution of the partnership agreement 
referred to in subsection (a), the Secretary may carry out maintenance 
of the project referred to in subsection (a) on an annual basis.
SEC. 3059. CACHE RIVER LEVEE, ILLINOIS.
    The Cache River Levee constructed for flood control at the Cache 
River, Illinois, and authorized by the Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 
1217), is modified to add environmental restoration as a project 
purpose.
SEC. 3060. CHICAGO RIVER, ILLINOIS.
    The Federal navigation channel for the North Branch Channel portion 
of the Chicago River authorized by section 22 of the Act of March 3, 
1899 (30 Stat. 1156), extending from 100 feet downstream of the Halsted 
Street Bridge to 100 feet upstream of the Division Street Bridge, 
Chicago, Illinois, shall be no wider than 66 feet.
SEC. 3061. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIERS PROJECT, 
ILLINOIS.
    (a) Treatment as Single Project.--The Chicago Sanitary and Ship 
Canal Dispersal Barrier Project (in this section referred to as 
``Barrier I''), as in existence on the date of enactment of this Act 
and constructed as a demonstration project under section 1202(i)(3) of 
the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 
(16 U.S.C. 4722(i)(3)), and the project relating to the Chicago 
Sanitary and Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier, authorized by section 345 of 
the District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-335; 
118 Stat. 1352) (in this section referred to as ``Barrier II'') shall 
be considered to constitute a single project.
    (b) Authorization.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary, at Federal expense, shall--
            (A) upgrade and make permanent Barrier I;
            (B) construct Barrier II, notwithstanding the project 
        cooperation agreement with the State of Illinois dated June 14, 
        2005;
            (C) operate and maintain Barrier I and Barrier II as a 
        system to optimize effectiveness;
            (D) conduct, in consultation with appropriate Federal, 
        State, local, and nongovernmental entities, a study of a range 
        of options and technologies for reducing impacts of hazards 
        that may reduce the efficacy of the Barriers; and
            (E) provide to each State a credit in an amount equal to 
        the amount of funds contributed by the State toward Barrier II.
        (2) Use of credit.--A State may apply a credit provided to the 
    State under paragraph (1)(E) to any cost sharing responsibility for 
    an existing or future Federal project carried out by the Secretary 
    in the State.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 345 of the District of Columbia 
Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-335; 118 Stat. 1352) is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``SEC. 345. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIER, 
      ILLINOIS.
    ``There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out the Barrier II element of the project for the 
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier, Illinois, initiated 
pursuant to section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 2294 note; 100 Stat. 4251).''.
    (d) Feasibility Study.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
appropriate Federal, State, local, and nongovernmental entities, shall 
conduct, at Federal expense, a feasibility study of the range of 
options and technologies available to prevent the spread of aquatic 
nuisance species between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River Basins 
through the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and other aquatic pathways.
SEC. 3062. EMIQUON, ILLINOIS.
    (a) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may 
be expended for the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Emiquon, 
Illinois, being carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), shall be $7,500,000.
    (b) Limitation.--Nothing in this section shall affect the 
eligibility of the project for emergency repair assistance under 
section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of 
certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for 
other purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).
SEC. 3063. LASALLE, ILLINOIS.
    In carrying out section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4639-4640), the Secretary shall give priority to 
work in the vicinity of LaSalle, Illinois, on the Illinois and Michigan 
Canal.
SEC. 3064. SPUNKY BOTTOMS, ILLINOIS.
    (a) Project Purpose.--The project for flood control, Spunky 
Bottoms, Illinois, authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act of 
June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1583), is modified to add environmental 
restoration as a project purpose.
    (b) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may 
be expended for the project for improvement of the quality of the 
environment, Spunky Bottoms, Illinois, being carried out under section 
1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), 
shall be $7,500,000.
    (c) Limitation.--Nothing in this section shall affect the 
eligibility of the project for emergency repair assistance under 
section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of 
certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for 
other purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).
    (d) Post Construction Monitoring and Management.--Of the Federal 
funds expended under subsection (b), not less than $500,000 shall 
remain available for a period of 5 years after the date of completion 
of construction of the modifications for use in carrying out post 
construction monitoring and adaptive management.
SEC. 3065. CEDAR LAKE, INDIANA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to plan, design, and 
construct an aquatic ecosystem restoration project at Cedar Lake, 
Indiana.
    (b) Complete Feasibility Report.--In planning the project 
authorized by subsection (a), the Secretary shall expedite completion 
of the feasibility report for the project for aquatic ecosystem 
restoration and protection, Cedar Lake, Indiana, initiated pursuant to 
section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act 1996 (33 U.S.C. 
2330).
    (c) Authorization.--
        (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
    $11,050,000 to carry out the activities authorized by this section.
        (2) Other.--The Secretary is authorized to use funds previously 
    appropriated for the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
    protection, Cedar Lake, Indiana, under section 206 of the Water 
    Resources Development Act 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330) to carry out the 
    activities authorized by this section.
SEC. 3066. KOONTZ LAKE, INDIANA.
    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Koontz Lake, 
Indiana, being carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330) and modified by section 520 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2655), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to seek to reduce the cost of the 
project by using innovative technologies and cost reduction measures 
determined from a review of non-Federal lake dredging projects in the 
vicinity of Koontz Lake.
SEC. 3067. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA.
    The project for flood control, Indianapolis on West Fork of White 
River, Indiana, authorized by section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and 
harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', approved June 22, 
1936 (49 Stat. 1586), and modified by section 323 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3716) and section 322 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 303), is 
modified--
        (1) to authorize the Secretary to carry out the ecosystem 
    restoration, recreation, and flood damage reduction components 
    described in the Central Indianapolis Waterfront Concept Plan, 
    dated February 1994, and revised by the Master Plan Revision 
    Central Indianapolis Waterfront, dated April 2004, at a total cost 
    of $28,545,000; and
        (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
    section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
    toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
    planning, design, and construction work carried out by the non-
    Federal interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
    agreement for the project.
SEC. 3068. DES MOINES RIVER AND GREENBELT, IOWA.
    The project for the Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, 
Iowa, authorized by Public Law 99-88 and modified by section 604 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4153), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to carry out ecosystem restoration, 
recreation, and flood damage reduction components of the project, at a 
Federal cost of $10,000,000.
SEC. 3069. PERRY CREEK, IOWA.
    (a) In General.--On making a determination described in subsection 
(b), the Secretary shall increase the Federal contribution by up to 
$4,000,000 for the project for flood control, Perry Creek, Iowa, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4116) and modified by section 151 of the Energy and 
Water Development Appropriations Act, 2004 (117 Stat. 1844).
    (b) Determination.--A determination referred to in subsection (a) 
is a determination that a modification to the project described in 
subsection (a) is necessary for the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
to certify that the project provides flood damage reduction benefits to 
at least a 100-year level of flood protection.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $4,000,000.
SEC. 3070. RATHBUN LAKE, IOWA.
    (a) Right of First Refusal.--The Secretary shall provide, in 
accordance with the recommendations in the Rathbun Lake Reallocation 
Report approved by the Chief of Engineers on July 22, 1985, the Rathbun 
Regional Water Association with the right of first refusal to contract 
for or purchase any increment of the remaining allocation of 8,320 
acre-feet of water supply storage in Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
    (b) Payment of Cost.--The Rathbun Regional Water Association shall 
pay the cost of any water supply storage allocation provided under 
subsection (a).
SEC. 3071. HICKMAN BLUFF STABILIZATION, KENTUCKY.
    The project for Hickman Bluff, Kentucky, authorized by chapter II 
of title II of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations and 
Rescissions for the Department of Defense to Preserve and Enhance 
Military Readiness Act of 1995 (109 Stat. 85), is modified to authorize 
the Secretary to repair and restore the project, at Federal expense, 
with no further economic studies or analyses, at a total cost of not 
more than $250,000.
SEC. 3072. MCALPINE LOCK AND DAM, KENTUCKY AND INDIANA.
    Section 101(a)(10) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(104 Stat. 4606) is amended by striking ``$219,600,000'' each place it 
appears and inserting ``$430,000,000''.
SEC. 3073. PRESTONSBURG, KENTUCKY.
    The Prestonsburg, Kentucky, element of the project for flood 
control, Levisa and Tug Fork of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, 
West Virginia, Virginia, and Kentucky, authorized by section 202(a) of 
the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 
1339), is modified to direct the Secretary to take measures to provide 
a 100-year level of flood protection for the city of Prestonsburg.
SEC. 3074. AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, LOUISIANA, EAST BATON ROUGE 
PARISH WATERSHED.
    The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Amite River 
and Tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish Watershed, 
authorized by section 101(a)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 277) and modified by section 116 of division D of 
Public Law 108-7 (117 Stat. 140), is further modified--
        (1) to direct the Secretary to carry out the project with the 
    cost sharing for the project determined in accordance with section 
    103(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
    2213(a)), as in effect on October 11, 1996;
        (2) to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a 
    total cost of $187,000,000; and
        (3) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
    section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
    toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
    work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before 
    the date of the partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3075. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LOUISIANA.
    (a) Acquisition of Additional Land.--The public access feature of 
the project for flood control, Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, 
Louisiana, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to acquire from willing sellers the fee interest (exclusive 
of oil, gas, and minerals) of an additional 20,000 acres of land in the 
Lower Atchafalaya Basin Floodway for such feature.
    (b) Modification.--
        (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), effective November 
    17, 1986, the $32,000,000 limitation on the maximum Federal 
    expenditure for the first costs of the public access feature 
    referred to in subsection (a) shall not apply.
        (2) Cost.--The modification under paragraph (1) shall not 
    increase the total authorized cost of the project referred to in 
    subsection (a).
    (c) Technical Amendment.--Section 315(a)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2603) is amended by inserting before 
the period at the end the following: ``and shall consider Eagle Point 
Park, Jeanerette, Louisiana, and the town of Melville, Louisiana, as 
site alternatives for such recreation features''.
SEC. 3076. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, REGIONAL VISITOR CENTER, 
LOUISIANA.
    (a) Project for Flood Control.--Notwithstanding paragraph (3) of 
the report of the Chief of Engineers dated February 28, 1983 (relating 
to recreational development in the Lower Atchafalaya Basin Floodway), 
the Secretary shall carry out the project for flood control, 
Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, Louisiana, authorized by chapter IV 
of title I of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (99 Stat. 313) 
and section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4142).
    (b) Visitors Center.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the State 
    of Louisiana, shall study, design, and construct a type A regional 
    visitors center in the vicinity of Morgan City, Louisiana.
        (2) Cost sharing.--
            (A) Cost of type b visitors center.--The cost of 
        construction of the visitors center up to the cost of 
        construction of a type B visitors center shall be shared in 
        accordance with the recreation cost-sharing requirement of 
        section 103(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (33 U.S.C. 2213(c)).
            (B) Cost of upgrading.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
        of upgrading the visitors center from a type B to type A 
        regional visitors center shall be 100 percent.
            (C) Operation and maintenance.--The cost of operation and 
        maintenance of the visitors center shall be a Federal 
        responsibility.
        (3) Donations.--In carrying out the project under this 
    subsection, the Mississippi River Commission may accept the 
    donation of cash or other funds, land, materials, and services from 
    any non-Federal government entity or nonprofit corporation, as the 
    Commission determines to be appropriate.
SEC. 3077. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND BLACK, 
LOUISIANA.
    The project for navigation, Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, 
Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to deepen up to a 1000-foot section of the area on the Gulf 
Intracoastal Waterway west of the Bayou Boeuf Lock and east of the 
intersection of the Atchafalaya River, at a cost not to exceed 
$200,000, to provide for ingress and egress to the port of Morgan City 
at a depth not to exceed 20 feet.
SEC. 3078. BAYOU PLAQUEMINE, LOUISIANA.
    The project for the improvement of the quality of the environment, 
Bayou Plaquemine, Louisiana, being carried out under section 1135 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3079. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LOUISIANA.
    The project for the Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana, authorized 
by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 481), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to provide $3,000,000 for each 
fiscal year, in a total amount of $15,000,000, for such rock bank 
protection of the Calcasieu River from mile 5 to mile 16 as the 
Secretary determines to be advisable to reduce maintenance dredging 
needs and facilitate protection of disposal areas for the Calcasieu 
River and Pass, Louisiana, if the Secretary determines that the rock 
bank protection is feasible.
SEC. 3080. RED RIVER (J. BENNETT JOHNSTON) WATERWAY, LOUISIANA.
    The project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses, Red River 
Waterway, Louisiana, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142) and modified by 
section 4(h) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 
4016), section 102(p) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(104 Stat. 4613), section 301(b)(7) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3710), and section 316 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2604), is modified--
        (1) to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project at a 
    total cost of $33,912,000;
        (2) to authorize the purchase and reforestation of lands that 
    have been cleared or converted to agricultural uses (in addition to 
    the purchase of bottomland hardwood); and
        (3) to incorporate wildlife and forestry management practices 
    to improve species diversity on mitigation land that meets habitat 
    goals and objectives of the United States and the State of 
    Louisiana.
SEC. 3081. MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LOUISIANA.
    The Mississippi Delta Region project, Louisiana, authorized as part 
of the project for hurricane-flood protection on Lake Pontchartrain, 
Louisiana, by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
1077) and modified by section 365 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3739), is modified to direct the Secretary to 
credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
(42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project the costs of relocating oyster beds in the Davis Pond project 
area.
SEC. 3082. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET RELOCATION ASSISTANCE, 
LOUISIANA.
    (a) Port Facilities Relocation.--
        (1) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
    appropriated to the Assistant Secretary for Economic Development 
    (referred to in this section as the ``Assistant Secretary'') 
    $75,000,000, to remain available until expended, to support the 
    relocation of Port of New Orleans deep draft facilities from the 
    Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet (referred to in this section as the 
    ``Outlet''), the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, and the Inner Harbor 
    Navigation Canal to the Mississippi River.
        (2) Administration.--
            (A) In general.--Amounts appropriated pursuant to paragraph 
        (1) shall be administered by the Assistant Secretary pursuant 
        to sections 209(c)(2) and 703 of the Public Works and Economic 
        Development Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3149(c)(2), 3233).
            (B) Requirement.--The Assistant Secretary shall make 
        amounts appropriated pursuant to paragraph (1) available to the 
        Port of New Orleans to relocate to the Mississippi River within 
        the State of Louisiana the port-owned facilities that are 
        occupied by businesses in the vicinity that may be impacted due 
        to the treatment of the Outlet under title VII of this Act.
    (b) Revolving Loan Fund Grants.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Assistant Secretary $85,000,000, to remain 
available until expended, to provide assistance pursuant to sections 
209(c)(2) and 703 of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 
1965 (42 U.S.C. 3149(c)(2), 3233) to one or more eligible recipients 
under such Act to establish revolving loan funds to make loans for 
terms up to 20 years at or below market interest rates (including 
interest-free loans) to private businesses within the Port of New 
Orleans that may need to relocate to the Mississippi River within the 
State of Louisiana due to the treatment of the Outlet under title VII 
of this Act.
    (c) Requirements.--In selecting one or more recipients under 
subsection (b), the Assistant Secretary shall ensure that each 
recipient has established procedures to target lending to businesses 
that will be directly and substantially impacted by the treatment of 
the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet under title VII of this Act.
    (d) Coordination With Secretary.--The Assistant Secretary shall 
ensure that the programs described in subsections (a) and (b) are 
coordinated with the Secretary to ensure that facilities are relocated 
in a manner that is consistent with the analysis and design of 
comprehensive hurricane protection authorized by title I of the Energy 
and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2247).
    (e) Administrative Expenses.--The Assistant Secretary may use up to 
2 percent of the amounts made available under subsections (a) and (b) 
for administrative expenses.
SEC. 3083. VIOLET, LOUISIANA.
    (a) Violet Diversion Project.--The Secretary shall design and 
implement a project for a diversion of freshwater at or near Violet, 
Louisiana, for the purposes of reducing salinity in the western 
Mississippi Sound, enhancing oyster production, and promoting the 
sustainability of coastal wetlands.
    (b) Salinity Levels.--The project shall be designed to meet, or 
maximize the ability to meet, the salinity levels identified in the 
feasibility study of the Corps of Engineers entitled ``Mississippi and 
Louisiana Estuarine Areas: Freshwater Diversion to Lake Pontchartrain 
Basin and Mississippi Sound'' and dated 1984.
    (c) Additional Measures.--
        (1) Recommendations.--If the Secretary determines that the 
    diversion of freshwater at or near Violet, Louisiana, will not 
    restore salinity levels to meet the requirements of subsection (b), 
    the Secretary shall recommend additional measures for freshwater 
    diversions sufficient to meet those levels.
        (2) Implementation.--The Secretary shall implement measures 
    included in the recommendations developed under paragraph (1) 
    beginning 60 days after the date on which a report containing the 
    recommendations is provided to the Committee on Environment and 
    Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
    Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
    (d) Non-Federal Financing Requirements.--
        (1) Estimates.--Before October 1 of each fiscal year, the 
    Secretary shall notify the States of Louisiana and Mississippi of 
    each State's respective estimated costs for that fiscal year for 
    the activities authorized under this section.
        (2) Escrow.--The States of Louisiana and Mississippi shall 
    provide the funds described in paragraph (1) by making a deposit 
    into an escrow account, or such other account, of the Treasury as 
    the Secretary determines to be acceptable within 30 days after the 
    date of receipt of the notification from the Secretary under 
    paragraph (1).
        (3) Deposits by louisiana.--
            (A) Use of certain funds.--The State of Louisiana may use 
        funds available to the State under the coastal impact 
        assistance program authorized under section 31 of the Outer 
        Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1356a) in meeting its 
        cost-sharing responsibilities under this section.
            (B) Failure to provide funds.--
                (i) In general.--If the State of Louisiana does not 
            provide the funds under paragraph (2), the Secretary of the 
            Interior, using funds to be disbursed to the State under 
            the program referred to in subparagraph (A) or under the 
            Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 (title I of 
            Division C of Public Law 109-432; (43 U.S.C. 1331 note; 120 
            Stat. 3000)), shall deposit such funds as are necessary to 
            meet the requirements for the State under paragraph (2).
                (ii) Deadline for deposit.--Any deposit required under 
            clause (i) shall be made prior to any other disbursements 
            made to the State of Louisiana under the programs referred 
            to in clause (i).
            (C) Exception.--The State of Louisiana shall not be 
        required to make a deposit of its share in any fiscal year in 
        which the State of Mississippi does not make its deposit 
        following a notification under paragraph (1) or the State of 
        Mississippi notifies the Secretary that it does not intend to 
        make a deposit in that fiscal year.
        (4) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
    section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
    toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for the 
    costs of design work carried out by the non-Federal interest for 
    the project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
    project.
        (5) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
    project authorized by subsection (a) shall be 75 percent.
    (e) Schedule.--
        (1) In general.--Subject to the availability of appropriations, 
    the Secretary shall complete the design of the project not later 
    than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act and shall 
    complete the construction of the project by not later than 
    September 30, 2012.
        (2) Missed deadline.--If the Secretary does not complete the 
    design or construction of the project in accordance with paragraph 
    (1), the Secretary shall complete the design or construction as 
    expeditiously as possible.
SEC. 3084. WEST BANK OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (EAST OF HARVEY CANAL), 
LOUISIANA.
    Section 328 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 304-305) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a)--
            (A) by striking ``operation and maintenance'' and inserting 
        ``operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, repair, and 
        replacement''; and
            (B) by striking ``Algiers Channel'' and inserting ``Algiers 
        Canal Levees''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project shall be 35 percent.''.
SEC. 3085. CAMP ELLIS, SACO, MAINE.
    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project being carried out under section 111 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i) for the mitigation of shore damages 
attributable to the project for navigation, Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine, 
shall be $26,900,000.
SEC. 3086. CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND.
    Section 580(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 375) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting ``$25,750,000'';
        (2) by striking ``$9,750,000'' and inserting ``$16,738,000''; 
    and
        (3) by striking ``$5,250,000'' and inserting ``$9,012,000''.
SEC. 3087. POPLAR ISLAND, MARYLAND.
    The project for navigation and environmental restoration through 
the beneficial use of dredged material, Poplar Island, Maryland, 
authorized by section 537 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3776) and modified by section 318 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2604), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the expansion of the project in 
accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 31, 
2006, at an additional total cost of $260,000,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $195,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$65,000,000.
SEC. 3088. DETROIT RIVER SHORELINE, DETROIT, MICHIGAN.
    (a) In General.--The project for emergency streambank and shoreline 
protection, Detroit River Shoreline, Detroit, Michigan, being carried 
out under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), 
is modified to include measures to enhance public access.
    (b) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project shall be $3,000,000.
SEC. 3089. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.
    Section 426 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 326) is amended to read as follows:
    ``SEC. 426. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.
    ``(a) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions 
apply:
        ``(1) Management plan.--The term `management plan' means the 
    management plan for the St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, 
    Michigan, that is in effect as of the date of enactment of the 
    Water Resources Development Act of 2007.
        ``(2) Partnership.--The term `Partnership' means the 
    partnership established by the Secretary under subsection (b)(1).
    ``(b) Partnership.--
        ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish and lead a 
    partnership of appropriate Federal agencies (including the 
    Environmental Protection Agency) and the State of Michigan 
    (including political subdivisions of the State)--
            ``(A) to promote cooperation among the Federal Government, 
        State and local governments, and other involved parties in the 
        management of the St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair 
        watersheds; and
            ``(B) to develop and implement projects consistent with the 
        management plan.
        ``(2) Coordination with actions under other law.--
            ``(A) In general.--Actions taken under this section by the 
        Partnership shall be coordinated with actions to restore and 
        conserve the St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair and watersheds 
        taken under other provisions of Federal and State law.
            ``(B) No effect on other law.--Nothing in this section 
        alters, modifies, or affects any other provision of Federal or 
        State law.
    ``(c) Implementation of St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair 
Management Plan.--
        ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall--
            ``(A) develop a St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair 
        strategic implementation plan in accordance with the management 
        plan;
            ``(B) provide technical, planning, and engineering 
        assistance to non-Federal interests for developing and 
        implementing activities consistent with the management plan;
            ``(C) plan, design, and implement projects consistent with 
        the management plan; and
            ``(D) provide, in coordination with the Administrator of 
        the Environmental Protection Agency, financial and technical 
        assistance, including grants, to the State of Michigan 
        (including political subdivisions of the State) and interested 
        nonprofit entities for the Federal share of the cost of 
        planning, design, and implementation of projects to restore, 
        conserve, manage, and sustain the St. Clair River, Lake St. 
        Clair, and associated watersheds.
        ``(2) Specific measures.--Financial and technical assistance 
    provided under subparagraphs (B) and (C) of paragraph (1) may be 
    used in support of non-Federal activities consistent with the 
    management plan.
    ``(d) Supplements to Management Plan and Strategic Implementation 
Plan.--In consultation with the Partnership and after providing an 
opportunity for public review and comment, the Secretary shall develop 
information to supplement--
        ``(1) the management plan; and
        ``(2) the strategic implementation plan developed under 
    subsection (c)(1)(A).
    ``(e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000.''.
SEC. 3090. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MICHIGAN.
    The Secretary shall expedite development of the dredged material 
management plan for the project for navigation, St. Joseph Harbor, 
Michigan, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
(72 Stat. 299).
SEC. 3091. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, MICHIGAN.
    (a) In General.--The text of section 1149 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254) is amended to read as follows:
    ``The Secretary shall construct, at Federal expense, a second lock, 
of a width not less than 110 feet and a length not less than 1,200 
feet, adjacent to the existing lock at Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan, 
generally in accordance with the report of the Board of Engineers for 
Rivers and Harbors, dated May 19, 1986, and the limited reevaluation 
report dated February 2004 at a total cost of $341,714,000.''.
    (b) Conforming Repeals.--The following provisions are repealed:
        (1) Section 107(a)(8) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
    1990 (104 Stat. 4620).
        (2) Section 330 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
    (110 Stat. 3717).
        (3) Section 330 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
    (113 Stat. 305).
SEC. 3092. ADA, MINNESOTA.
    In carrying out the project for flood damage reduction, Wild Rice 
River, Ada, Minnesota, under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal 
interest to participate in the financing of the project in accordance 
with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4184) if the detailed project report evaluation indicates that 
applying such section is necessary to implement the project.
SEC. 3093. DULUTH HARBOR, MCQUADE ROAD, MINNESOTA.
    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Duluth Harbor, McQuade 
Road, Minnesota, being carried out under section 107 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and modified by section 321 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2605), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to provide public access and recreational 
facilities as generally described in the Detailed Project Report and 
Environmental Assessment, McQuade Road Harbor of Refuge, Duluth, 
Minnesota, dated August 1999.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project for the costs of design 
work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project.
    (c) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project shall be $9,000,000.
SEC. 3094. GRAND MARAIS, MINNESOTA.
    The project for navigation, Grand Marais, Minnesota, carried out 
under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) 
is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
design work carried out for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3095. GRAND PORTAGE HARBOR, MINNESOTA.
    The Secretary shall provide credit in accordance with section 221 
of the Flood Control Act (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the navigation project for Grand Portage Harbor, 
Minnesota, carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), for the costs of design work carried out for the 
project before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3096. GRANITE FALLS, MINNESOTA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary is directed to implement the locally 
preferred plan for flood damage reduction, Granite Falls, Minnesota, at 
a total cost of $12,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$8,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,000,000. In carrying 
out the project, the Secretary shall utilize, to the extent 
practicable, the existing detailed project report dated 2002 for the 
project prepared under the authority of section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
    (b) Project Financing.--In evaluating and implementing the project 
under this section, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interests 
to participate in the financing of the project in accordance with 
section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4184) if the detailed project report evaluation indicates that 
applying such section is necessary to implement the project.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the project the cost of design and construction 
work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
date of execution of a partnership agreement for the project.
    (d) Maximum Funding.--The maximum amount of Federal funds that may 
be expended for the flood damage reduction shall be $8,000,000.
SEC. 3097. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MINNESOTA.
    The project for navigation, Harbor at Knife River, Minnesota, 
authorized by section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 2, 1945 
(59 Stat. 19), is modified to direct the Secretary to develop a final 
design and prepare plans and specifications to correct the harbor 
entrance and mooring conditions at the project.
SEC. 3098. RED LAKE RIVER, MINNESOTA.
    The project for flood control, Red Lake River, Crookston, 
Minnesota, authorized by section 101(a)(23) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), is modified to include flood 
protection for the adjacent and interconnected areas generally known as 
the Sampson and Chase/Loring neighborhoods, in accordance with the 
feasibility report supplement for local flood protection, Crookston, 
Minnesota, at a total cost of $25,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $16,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,750,000.
SEC. 3099. SILVER BAY, MINNESOTA.
    The project for navigation, Silver Bay, Minnesota, authorized by 
section 2 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 19), 
is modified to include operation and maintenance of the general 
navigation facilities as a Federal responsibility.
SEC. 3100. TACONITE HARBOR, MINNESOTA.
    The project for navigation, Taconite Harbor, Minnesota, carried out 
under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
is modified to include operation and maintenance of the general 
navigation facilities as a Federal responsibility.
SEC. 3101. TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA.
    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the requirements of section 107(a) 
of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577(a)), the project for 
navigation, Two Harbors, Minnesota, being carried out under such 
authority, is justified on the basis of navigation safety.
    (b) Maximum Federal Expenditures.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project shall be $7,000,000.
SEC. 3102. DEER ISLAND, HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.
    The project for ecosystem restoration, Deer Island, Harrison 
County, Mississippi, being carried out under section 204 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326), is modified to 
authorize the non-Federal interest to provide, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), any 
portion of the non-Federal share of the cost of the project in the form 
of in-kind services and materials.
SEC. 3103. JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.
    (a) Modification.--Section 331 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 305) is amended by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$9,000,000''.
    (b) Applicability of Credit.--The credit provided by section 331 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 305) (as amended 
by subsection (a) of this section) shall apply to costs incurred by the 
Jackson County Board of Supervisors during the period beginning on 
February 8, 1994, and ending on the date of enactment of this Act for 
projects authorized by section 219(c)(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 
1494).
SEC. 3104. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI.
    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, Pearl 
River Basin, including Shoccoe, Mississippi, authorized by section 
401(e)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4132), is modified to authorize the Secretary, subject to subsection 
(c), to construct the project generally in accordance with the plan 
described in the ``Pearl River Watershed, Mississippi, Feasibility 
Study Main Report, Preliminary Draft'', dated February 2007, at a total 
cost of $205,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $133,770,000 
and an estimated non-Federal cost of $72,030,000.
    (b) Comparison of Alternatives.--Before initiating construction of 
the project, the Secretary shall compare the level of flood damage 
reduction provided by the plan that maximizes national economic 
development benefits of the project and the locally preferred plan, 
referred to as the LeFleur Lakes plan, to that portion of Jackson, 
Mississippi and vicinity, located below the Ross Barnett Reservoir Dam.
    (c) Implementation of Plan.--
        (1) In general.--If the Secretary determines under subsection 
    (b) that the locally preferred plan provides a level of flood 
    damage reduction that is equal to or greater than the level of 
    flood damage reduction provided by the national economic 
    development plan and that the locally preferred plan is 
    environmentally acceptable and technically feasible, the Secretary 
    may construct the project identified as the national economic 
    development plan, or the locally preferred plan, or some 
    combination thereof.
        (2) Construction by non-federal interests.--The non-Federal 
    interest may carry out the project under section 211 of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13).
    (d) Project Financing.--In evaluating and implementing the project 
under this section, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interests 
to participate in the financing of the project in accordance with 
section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4184) if the detailed project report evaluation indicates that 
applying such section is necessary to implement the project.
    (e) Non-Federal Cost Share.--If the locally preferred plan is 
selected for construction of the project, the Federal share of the cost 
of the project shall be limited to the share as provided by law for the 
elements of the national economic development plan.
SEC. 3105. FESTUS AND CRYSTAL CITY, MISSOURI.
    Section 102(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 282) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting 
``$13,000,000''.
SEC. 3106. L-15 LEVEE, MISSOURI.
    The portion of the L-15 levee system that is under the jurisdiction 
of the Consolidated North County Levee District and situated along the 
right descending bank of the Mississippi River from the confluence of 
that river with the Missouri River and running upstream approximately 
14 miles shall be considered to be a Federal levee for purposes of cost 
sharing under section 5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).
SEC. 3107. MONARCH-CHESTERFIELD, MISSOURI.
    The project for flood damage reduction, Monarch-Chesterfield, 
Missouri, authorized by section 101(b)(18) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project the cost of the planning, design, and 
construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
project before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3108. RIVER DES PERES, MISSOURI.
    The projects for flood control, River Des Peres, Missouri, 
authorized by section 101(a)(17) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607) and section 102(13) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3668), are each modified to direct 
the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out by the non-
Federal interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project.
SEC. 3109. LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT, MONTANA.
    The Secretary may use funds appropriated to carry out the Missouri 
River recovery and mitigation program to assist the Bureau of 
Reclamation in the design and construction of the Lower Yellowstone 
project of the Bureau, Intake, Montana, for the purpose of ecosystem 
restoration.
SEC. 3110. YELLOWSTONE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MONTANA AND NORTH DAKOTA.
    (a) Definition of Restoration Project.--In this section, the term 
``restoration project'' means a project that will produce, in 
accordance with other Federal programs, projects, and activities, 
substantial ecosystem restoration and related benefits, as determined 
by the Secretary.
    (b) Projects.--The Secretary shall carry out, in accordance with 
other Federal programs, projects, and activities, restoration projects 
in the watershed of the Yellowstone River and tributaries in Montana, 
and in North Dakota, to produce immediate and substantial ecosystem 
restoration and recreation benefits.
    (c) Local Participation.--In carrying out subsection (b), the 
Secretary shall--
        (1) consult with, and consider the activities being carried out 
    by--
            (A) other Federal agencies;
            (B) Indian tribes;
            (C) conservation districts; and
            (D) the Yellowstone River Conservation District Council; 
        and
        (2) seek the participation of the State of Montana.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000.
SEC. 3111. ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NEBRASKA.
    The project for flood damage reduction, Antelope Creek, Lincoln, 
Nebraska, authorized by section 101(b)(19) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified--
        (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
    section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
    toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
    design and construction work carried out by the non-Federal 
    interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
    agreement for the project; and
        (2) to allow the non-Federal interest for the project to use, 
    and to direct the Secretary to accept, funds provided under any 
    other Federal program to satisfy, in whole or in part, the non-
    Federal share of the project if the Federal agency that provides 
    such funds determines that the funds are authorized to be used to 
    carry out the project.
SEC. 3112. SAND CREEK WATERSHED, WAHOO, NEBRASKA.
    The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage reduction, 
Sand Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska, authorized by section 101(b)(20) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is 
modified--
        (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
    section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
    toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project or 
    reimbursement for the costs of any work performed by the non-
    Federal interest for the project before the approval of the project 
    partnership agreement, including work performed by the non-Federal 
    interest in connection with the design and construction of 7 
    upstream detention storage structures;
        (2) to require that in-kind work to be credited under paragraph 
    (1) be subject to audit; and
        (3) to direct the Secretary to accept advance funds from the 
    non-Federal interest as needed to maintain the project schedule.
SEC. 3113. WESTERN SARPY AND CLEAR CREEK, NEBRASKA.
    The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage reduction, 
Western Sarpy and Clear Creek, Nebraska, authorized by section 
101(b)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
2578), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
at a total cost of $21,664,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$14,082,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,582,000.
SEC. 3114. LOWER TRUCKEE RIVER, MCCARRAN RANCH, NEVADA.
    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project being carried out, as of the date of enactment of this Act, 
under section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2309a) for environmental restoration of McCarran Ranch, Nevada, 
shall be $5,775,000.
SEC. 3115. LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, NEW JERSEY.
    The project for navigation mitigation, ecosystem restoration, shore 
protection, and hurricane and storm damage reduction, Lower Cape May 
Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey, authorized by section 101(a)(25) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), is 
modified to incorporate the project for shoreline erosion control, Cape 
May Point, New Jersey, carried out under section 5 of the Act entitled 
``An Act authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting 
the shores of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 
U.S.C. 426h), if the Secretary determines that such incorporation is 
feasible.
SEC. 3116. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MANAGEMENT, NEW JERSEY.
    The project for flood control, Passaic River, New Jersey and New 
York, authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607) and modified by section 327 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2607), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to include the benefits and costs of 
preserving natural flood storage in any future economic analysis of the 
project.
SEC. 3117. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS, NEW MEXICO.
    The Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements with any Indian 
tribe any land of which is located in the State of New Mexico and 
occupied by a flood control project that is owned and operated by the 
Corps of Engineers to assist in carrying out any operation or 
maintenance activity associated with the flood control project.
SEC. 3118. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE RESTORATION, NEW MEXICO.
    (a) Restoration Projects Defined.--In this section, the term 
``restoration project'' means a project that will produce, consistent 
with other Federal programs, projects, and activities, immediate and 
substantial ecosystem restoration and recreation benefits.
    (b) Project Selection.--The Secretary shall select and shall carry 
out restoration projects in the Middle Rio Grande from Cochiti Dam to 
the headwaters of Elephant Butte Reservoir in the State of New Mexico.
    (c) Local Participation.--In carrying out subsection (b), the 
Secretary shall consult with, and consider the activities being carried 
out by--
        (1) the Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Act Collaborative 
    Program; and
        (2) the Bosque Improvement Group of the Middle Rio Grande 
    Bosque Initiative.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 3119. BUFFALO HARBOR, NEW YORK.
    The project for navigation, Buffalo Harbor, New York, authorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176), is 
modified to include measures to enhance public access, at Federal cost 
of $500,000.
SEC. 3120. LONG ISLAND SOUND OYSTER RESTORATION, NEW YORK AND 
CONNECTICUT.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall plan, design, and construct 
projects to increase aquatic habitats within Long Island Sound and 
adjacent waters, including the construction and restoration of oyster 
beds and related shellfish habitat.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of activities 
carried out under this section shall be 25 percent and may be provided 
through in-kind services and materials.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 3121. MAMARONECK AND SHELDRAKE RIVERS WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, NEW 
YORK.
    (a) Watershed Management Plan Development.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the State 
    of New York and local entities, shall develop watershed management 
    plans for the Mamaroneck and Sheldrake River watershed for the 
    purposes of evaluating existing and new flood damage reduction and 
    ecosystem restoration.
        (2) Existing plans.--In developing the watershed management 
    plans, the Secretary shall use existing studies and plans, as 
    appropriate.
    (b) Critical Restoration Projects.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in any eligible 
    critical restoration project in the Mamaroneck and Sheldrake Rivers 
    watershed in accordance with the watershed management plans 
    developed under subsection (a).
        (2) Eligible projects.--A critical restoration project shall be 
    eligible for assistance under this section if the project--
            (A) meets the purposes described in the watershed 
        management plans developed under subsection (a); and
            (B) with respect to the Mamaroneck and Sheldrake Rivers 
        watershed in New York, consists of flood damage reduction or 
        ecosystem restoration through--
                (i) bank stabilization of the mainstem, tributaries, 
            and streams;
                (ii) wetland restoration;
                (iii) soil and water conservation;
                (iv) restoration of natural flows;
                (v) restoration of stream stability;
                (vi) structural and nonstructural flood damage 
            reduction measures; or
                (vii) any other project or activity the Secretary 
            determines to be appropriate.
    (c) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary may enter into one or more cooperative agreements to provide 
financial assistance to appropriate Federal, State, or local 
governments or nonprofit agencies, including assistance for the 
implementation of projects to be carried out under subsection (b).
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.
SEC. 3122. ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NEW YORK.
    Section 554 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3781) is amended by striking ``maximum Federal cost of 
$5,200,000'' and inserting ``total cost of $20,000,000''.
SEC. 3123. PORT OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.
    The navigation project, Port of New York and New Jersey, New York 
and New Jersey, authorized by section 101(a)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2576), is modified--
        (1) to authorize the Secretary to allow the non-Federal 
    interest to construct a temporary dredged material storage facility 
    to receive dredged material from the project if--
            (A) the non-Federal interest submits, in writing, a list of 
        potential sites for the temporary storage facility to the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives, the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
        of the Senate, and the Secretary at least 180 days before the 
        selection of the final site; and
            (B) at least 70 percent of the dredged material generated 
        in connection with the project suitable for beneficial reuse 
        will be used at sites in the State of New Jersey to the extent 
        that there are sufficient sites available; and
        (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
    section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
    toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
    construction of the temporary storage facility for the project.
SEC. 3124. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.
    Section 553(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3781) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) New York State Canal System Defined.--In this section, the 
term `New York State Canal System' means the 524 miles of navigable 
canal that comprise the New York State Canal System, including the 
Erie, Cayuga-Seneca, Oswego, and Champlain Canals and the historic 
alignments of these canals, including the cities of Albany, Rochester, 
and Buffalo.''.
SEC. 3125. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER AND UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED 
MANAGEMENT, NEW YORK.
    (a) Watershed Management Plan Development.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the State 
    of New York, the Delaware or Susquehanna River Basin Commission, as 
    appropriate, and local entities, shall develop watershed management 
    plans for the Susquehanna River watershed in New York State and the 
    Upper Delaware River watershed for the purposes of evaluating 
    existing and new flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration.
        (2) Existing plans.--In developing the watershed management 
    plans, the Secretary shall use existing studies and plans, as 
    appropriate.
    (b) Critical Restoration Projects.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in any eligible 
    critical restoration project in the Susquehanna River or Upper 
    Delaware Rivers in accordance with the watershed management plans 
    developed under subsection (a).
        (2) Eligible projects.--A critical restoration project shall be 
    eligible for assistance under this section if the project--
            (A) meets the purposes described in the watershed 
        management plans developed under subsection (a); and
            (B) with respect to the Susquehanna River or Upper Delaware 
        River watershed in New York, consists of flood damage reduction 
        or ecosystem restoration through--
                (i) bank stabilization of the mainstem, tributaries, 
            and streams;
                (ii) wetland restoration;
                (iii) soil and water conservation;
                (iv) restoration of natural flows;
                (v) restoration of stream stability;
                (vi) structural and nonstructural flood damage 
            reduction measures; or
                (vii) any other project or activity the Secretary 
            determines to be appropriate.
    (c) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary may enter into 1 or more cooperative agreements to provide 
financial assistance to appropriate Federal, State, or local 
governments or nonprofit agencies, including assistance for the 
implementation of projects to be carried out under subsection (b).
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.
SEC. 3126. MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, NORTH DAKOTA.
    Section 707(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2699) is amended in the first sentence by striking ``$5,000,000'' 
and all that follows through ``2005'' and inserting ``$25,000,000''.
SEC. 3127. WAHPETON, NORTH DAKOTA.
    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be allotted for the 
project for flood damage reduction, Wahpeton, North Dakota, being 
carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 
U.S.C. 701s), shall be $12,000,000.
SEC. 3128. OHIO.
    Section 594 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 381) is amended--
        (1) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g) 
    and (h), respectively; and
        (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:
    ``(f) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a non-Federal interest 
for any project carried out under this section may include a nonprofit 
entity, with the consent of the affected local government.''.
SEC. 3129. LOWER GIRARD LAKE DAM, GIRARD, OHIO.
    Section 507 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3758) is amended--
        (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The 
    Secretary'';
        (2) in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) (as designated by 
    paragraph (1) of this subsection)--
            (A) by striking ``Repair and rehabilitation'' and all that 
        follows through ``Ohio'' and inserting ``Correction of 
        structural deficiencies of the Lower Girard Lake Dam, Girard, 
        Ohio, and the appurtenant features to meet the dam safety 
        standards of the State of Ohio''; and
            (B) by striking ``$2,500,000'' and inserting 
        ``$16,000,000''; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Special Rules.--The project for Lower Girard Lake Dam, 
Girard, Ohio, authorized by subsection (a)(1) is justified on the basis 
of public safety.''.
SEC. 3130. MAHONING RIVER, OHIO.
    In carrying out the project for environmental dredging, authorized 
by section 312(f)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 1272(f)(4)), the Secretary is directed to credit, in accordance 
with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3131. ARCADIA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.
    Payments made by the city of Edmond, Oklahoma, to the Secretary in 
October 1999 of all costs associated with present and future water 
storage costs at Arcadia Lake, Oklahoma, under Arcadia Lake Water 
Storage Contract Number DACW56-79-C-0072 shall satisfy the obligations 
of the city under that contract.
SEC. 3132. ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR, OKLAHOMA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to participate in the 
ecosystem restoration, recreation, and flood damage reduction 
components of the Arkansas River Corridor Master Plan dated October 
2005. The Secretary shall coordinate with appropriate representatives 
in the vicinity of Tulsa, Oklahoma, including representatives of Tulsa 
County and surrounding communities and the Indian Nations Council of 
Governments.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $50,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 3133. LAKE EUFAULA, OKLAHOMA.
    (a) Project Goal.--
        (1) In general.--The goal for operation of Lake Eufaula, 
    Oklahoma, shall be to maximize the use of available storage in a 
    balanced approach that incorporates advice from representatives 
    from all the project purposes to ensure that the full value of the 
    reservoir is realized by the United States.
        (2) Recognition of purpose.--To achieve the goal described in 
    paragraph (1), recreation is recognized as a project purpose at 
    Lake Eufaula, pursuant to section 4 of the Flood Control Act of 
    December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 889).
    (b) Lake Eufaula Advisory Committee.--
        (1) In general.--In accordance with the Federal Advisory 
    Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), the Secretary shall establish an 
    advisory committee for the Lake Eufaula, Canadian River, Oklahoma 
    project authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor Act 
    of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 635).
        (2) Purpose.--The purpose of the committee shall be advisory 
    only.
        (3) Duties.--The committee shall provide information and 
    recommendations to the Corps of Engineers regarding the operations 
    of Lake Eufaula for the project purposes for Lake Eufaula.
        (4) Composition.--The Committee shall be composed of members 
    that equally represent the project purposes for Lake Eufaula.
    (c) Reallocation Study.--
        (1) In general.--Subject to the appropriation of funds, the 
    Secretary shall perform a reallocation study, at Federal expense, 
    to develop and present recommendations concerning the best value, 
    while minimizing ecological damages, for current and future use of 
    the Lake Eufaula storage capacity for the authorized project 
    purposes of flood control, water supply, hydroelectric power, 
    navigation, fish and wildlife, and recreation.
        (2) Factors for consideration.--The reallocation study shall 
    take into consideration the recommendations of the Lake Eufaula 
    Advisory Committee.
    (d) Pool Management Plan.--
        (1) In general.--Not later than one year after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, to the extent feasible within available 
    project funds and subject to the completion and approval of the 
    reallocation study under subsection (c), the Tulsa district 
    engineer, taking into consideration recommendations of the Lake 
    Eufaula Advisory Committee, shall develop an interim management 
    plan that accommodates all project purposes for Lake Eufaula.
        (2) Modifications.--A modification of the plan under paragraph 
    (1) shall not cause significant adverse impacts on any existing 
    permit, lease, license, contract, public law, or project purpose, 
    including flood control operation, relating to Lake Eufaula.
SEC. 3134. OKLAHOMA LAKES DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM, OKLAHOMA.
    (a) Implementation of Program.--Not later than one year after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall implement an 
innovative program at the lakes located primarily in the State of 
Oklahoma that are a part of an authorized civil works project under the 
administrative jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers for the purpose 
of demonstrating the benefits of enhanced recreation facilities and 
activities at those lakes.
    (b) Requirements.--In implementing the program under subsection 
(a), the Secretary, consistent with authorized project purposes, 
shall--
        (1) pursue strategies that will enhance, to the maximum extent 
    practicable, recreation experiences at the lakes included in the 
    program;
        (2) use creative management strategies that optimize 
    recreational activities; and
        (3) ensure continued public access to recreation areas located 
    on or associated with the civil works project.
    (c) Guidelines.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidelines for the 
implementation of this section, to be developed in coordination with 
the State of Oklahoma.
    (d) Report.--
        (1) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee 
    on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
    Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a 
    report describing the results of the program under subsection (a).
        (2) Inclusions.--The report under paragraph (1) shall include a 
    description of the projects undertaken under the program, 
    including--
            (A) an estimate of the change in any related recreational 
        opportunities;
            (B) a description of any leases entered into, including the 
        parties involved; and
            (C) the financial conditions that the Corps of Engineers 
        used to justify those leases.
        (3) Availability to public.--The Secretary shall make the 
    report available to the public in electronic and written formats.
    (e) Termination.--The authority provided by this section shall 
terminate on the date that is 10 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
SEC. 3135. OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA.
    (a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated $30,000,000 
for the purposes set forth in subsection (b).
    (b) Purposes.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, funds 
appropriated under subsection (a) may be used for the purpose of--
        (1) the buyout of properties and permanently relocating 
    residents and businesses in or near Picher, Cardin, and 
    Hockerville, Oklahoma, from areas determined by the State of 
    Oklahoma to be at risk of damage caused by land subsidence and 
    remaining properties; and
        (2) providing funding to the State of Oklahoma to buyout 
    properties and permanently relocate residents and businesses of 
    Picher, Cardin, and Hockerville, Oklahoma, from areas determined by 
    the State of Oklahoma to be at risk of damage caused by land 
    subsidence and remaining properties.
    (c) Limitation.--The use of funds in accordance with subsection (b) 
shall not be considered to be part of a federally assisted program or 
project for purposes of Public Law 91-646 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.), 
consistent with section 2301 of Public Law 109-234 (120 Stat. 455).
    (d) Consistency With State Program.--Any actions taken under 
subsection (b) shall be consistent with the relocation program in the 
State of Oklahoma under 27A O.S. Supp. 2006, sections 2201 et seq.
    (e) Consideration of Remedial Action.--The Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency shall consider, without delay, a 
remedial action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) for 
the Tar Creek, Oklahoma, National Priorities List site that includes 
permanent relocation of residents consistent with the program currently 
being administered by the State of Oklahoma. Such relocation shall not 
be subject to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property 
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.).
    (f) Estimating Costs.--In estimating and comparing the cost of a 
remedial alternative for the Tar Creek Oklahoma, National Priorities 
List site that includes the permanent relocation of residents, the 
Administrator shall not include the cost of compliance with the Uniform 
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 
1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.).
    (g) Effect of Certain Remedies.--Inclusion of subsidence remedies, 
such as permanent relocation within any remedial action, shall not 
preempt, alter, or delay the right of any sovereign entity, including 
any State or tribal government, to seek remedies, including abatement, 
for land subsidence and subsidence risks under State law.
    (h) Amendment.--Section 111 of Public Law 108-137 (117 Stat. 1835) 
is amended--
        (1) by adding at the end of subsection (a) the following: 
    ``Such activities also may include the provision of financial 
    assistance to facilitate the buy out of properties located in areas 
    identified by the State as areas that are or will be at risk of 
    damage caused by land subsidence and associated properties 
    otherwise identified by the State. Any buyout of such properties 
    shall not be considered to be part of a federally assisted program 
    or project for purposes of Public Law 91-646 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et 
    seq.), consistent with section 2301 of Public Law 109-234 (120 
    Stat. 455-456).''; and
        (2) by striking the first sentence of subsection (d) and 
    inserting the following: ``Non-Federal interests shall be 
    responsible for operating and maintaining any restoration 
    alternatives constructed or carried out pursuant to this 
    section.''.
SEC. 3136. RED RIVER CHLORIDE CONTROL, OKLAHOMA AND TEXAS.
    The project for water quality control in the Arkansas and Red River 
Basin, Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas, authorized by section 203 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1420) and modified by section 
1107(a) of the Water Resources Development A of 1986 (100 Stat. 4229) 
is further modified to direct the Secretary to provide operation and 
maintenance for the Red River Chloride Control project, Oklahoma and 
Texas, at Federal expense.
SEC. 3137. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.
    The remaining obligation of the Waurika Project Master Conservancy 
District payable to the United States Government in the amounts, rates 
of interest, and payment schedules--
        (1) is set at the amounts, rates of interest, and payment 
    schedules that existed on June 3, 1986, with respect to the project 
    for Waurika Lake, Oklahoma; and
        (2) may not be adjusted, altered, or changed without a 
    specific, separate, and written agreement between the District and 
    the United States.
SEC. 3138. UPPER WILLAMETTE RIVER WATERSHED ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, 
OREGON.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct studies and ecosystem 
restoration projects for the upper Willamette River watershed from 
Albany, Oregon, to the headwaters of the Willamette River and 
tributaries.
    (b) Consultation.--The Secretary shall carry out ecosystem 
restoration projects under this section for the Upper Willamette River 
watershed in consultation with the Governor of the State of Oregon, the 
heads of appropriate Indian tribes, the Environmental Protection 
Agency, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the National 
Marine Fisheries Service, the Bureau of Land Management, the Forest 
Service, and local entities.
    (c) Authorized Activities.--In carrying out ecosystem restoration 
projects under this section, the Secretary shall undertake activities 
necessary to protect, monitor, and restore fish and wildlife habitat.
    (d) Priority.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall 
give priority to a project to restore the millrace in Eugene, Oregon, 
and shall include noneconomic benefits associated with the historical 
significance of the millrace and associated with preservation and 
enhancement of resources in evaluating the benefits of the project.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000.
SEC. 3139. DELAWARE RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA, NEW JERSEY, AND DELAWARE.
    The Secretary may remove debris from the project for navigation, 
Delaware River, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware, Philadelphia to 
the Sea.
SEC. 3140. RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.
    The Secretary may take such action as may be necessary, including 
construction of a breakwater, to prevent shoreline erosion between .07 
and 2.7 miles south of Pennsylvania State Route 994 on the east shore 
of Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
SEC. 3141. SHERADEN PARK STREAM AND CHARTIERS CREEK, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, 
PENNSYLVANIA.
    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Sheraden Park Stream 
and Chartiers Creek, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, being carried out 
under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330), is modified to direct the Secretary to credit, in 
accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
1962d-5b), up to $400,000 toward the non-Federal share of the cost of 
the project for planning and design work carried out by the non-Federal 
interest for the project before the date of the partnership agreement 
for the project.
SEC. 3142. SOLOMON'S CREEK, WILKES-BARRE, PENNSYLVANIA.
    The project for flood control, Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4124), is modified to include as a project element the 
project for flood control for Solomon's Creek, Wilkes-Barre, 
Pennsylvania.
SEC. 3143. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.
    Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4845; 109 Stat. 407; 110 Stat. 3723; 113 Stat. 310; 117 Stat. 
142) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (g)(1) by striking ``$180,000,000'' and 
    inserting ``$200,000,000''; and
        (2) in subsection (h)(2) by striking ``Allegheny, Armstrong, 
    Beford, Blair, Cambria, Clearfield, Fayette, Franklin, Fulton, 
    Greene, Huntingdon, Indiana, Juniata, Mifflin, Somerset, Snyder, 
    Washington, and Westmoreland Counties'' and inserting ``Allegheny, 
    Armstrong, Bedford, Blair, Cambria, Fayette, Franklin, Fulton, 
    Greene, Huntingdon, Indiana, Juniata, Somerset, Washington, and 
    Westmoreland Counties''.
SEC. 3144. WYOMING VALLEY, PENNSYLVANIA.
    In carrying out the project for flood control, Wyoming Valley, 
Pennsylvania, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124), the Secretary shall 
coordinate with non-Federal interests to review opportunities for 
increased public access.
SEC. 3145. NARRAGANSETT BAY, RHODE ISLAND.
    The Secretary may use amounts in the Environmental Restoration 
Account, Formerly Used Defense Sites, under section 2703(a)(5) of title 
10, United States Code, for the removal of abandoned marine camels at 
any formerly used defense site under the jurisdiction of the Department 
of Defense that is undergoing (or is scheduled to undergo) 
environmental remediation under chapter 160 of title 10, United States 
Code (and other provisions of law), in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, 
in accordance with the Corps of Engineers prioritization process under 
the Formerly Used Defense Sites program.
SEC. 3146. MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, SOUTH DAKOTA.
    (a) Membership.--Section 904(b)(1)(B) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2708) is amended--
        (1) in clause (vii) by striking ``and'' at the end;
        (2) by redesignating clause (viii) as clause (ix); and
        (3) by inserting after clause (vii) the following:
                ``(viii) rural water systems; and''.
    (b) Reauthorization.--Section 907(a) of such Act (114 Stat. 2712) 
is amended in the first sentence by striking ``2005'' and inserting 
``2010''.
SEC. 3147. CEDAR BAYOU, TEXAS.
    (a) Credit for Planning and Design.--The project for navigation, 
Cedar Bayou, Texas, reauthorized by section 349(a)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2632), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project the cost of planning and design work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date 
of the partnership agreement for the project.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Cost sharing for construction and operation and 
maintenance of the project shall be determined in accordance with 
section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2211).
    (c) Project for Navigation.--Section 349(a)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2632) is amended by 
striking ``12 feet deep by 125 feet wide'' and inserting ``that is 10 
feet deep by 100 feet wide''.
SEC. 3148. FREEPORT HARBOR, TEXAS.
    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Freeport Harbor, 
Texas, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 
(84 Stat. 1818), is modified to provide that--
        (1) all project costs incurred as a result of the discovery of 
    the sunken vessel COMSTOCK of the Corps of Engineers are a Federal 
    responsibility; and
        (2) the Secretary shall not seek further obligation or 
    responsibility for removal of the vessel COMSTOCK, or costs 
    associated with a delay due to the discovery of the sunken vessel 
    COMSTOCK, from the Port of Freeport.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--This section does not affect the authorized cost 
sharing for the balance of the project described in subsection (a).
SEC. 3149. LAKE KEMP, TEXAS.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may not take any legal or 
administrative action seeking to remove a Lake Kemp improvement before 
the earlier of January 1, 2020, or the date of any transfer of 
ownership of the improvement occurring after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (b) Limitation on Liability.--The United States, or any of its 
officers, agents, or assignees, shall not be liable for any injury, 
loss, or damage accruing to the owners of a Lake Kemp improvement, 
their lessees, or occupants as a result of any flooding or inundation 
of such improvements by the waters of the Lake Kemp reservoir, or for 
such injury, loss, or damage as may occur through the operation and 
maintenance of the Lake Kemp dam and reservoir in any manner.
    (c) Lake Kemp Improvement Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Lake Kemp improvement'' means an improvement (including dwellings) 
located within the flowage easement of Lake Kemp, Texas, below 
elevation 1159 feet mean sea level.
SEC. 3150. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TEXAS.
    The project for flood control, Lower Rio Grande Basin, Texas, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4125), is modified--
        (1) to include as part of the project flood protection works to 
    reroute drainage to Raymondville Drain constructed by the non-
    Federal interests in Hidalgo County in the vicinity of Edinburg, 
    Texas, if the Secretary determines that such work is feasible;
        (2) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
    section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
    toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
    planning, design, and construction work carried out by the non-
    Federal interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
    agreement for the project; and
        (3) to direct the Secretary in calculating the non-Federal 
    share of the cost of the project, to make a determination, within 
    180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, under section 
    103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
    2213(m)) on the non-Federal interest's ability to pay.
SEC. 3151. NORTH PADRE ISLAND, CORPUS CHRISTI BAY, TEXAS.
    The project for ecosystem restoration and storm damage reduction, 
North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay, Texas, authorized by section 
556 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 353), is 
modified to include recreation as a project purpose.
SEC. 3152. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TEXAS.
    The Secretary is directed to accept from the city of Paris, Texas, 
$3,461,432 as payment in full of monies owed to the United States for 
water supply storage space in Pat Mayse Lake, Texas, under contract 
number DA-34-066-CIVENG-65-1272, including accrued interest.
SEC. 3153. PROCTOR LAKE, TEXAS.
    The Secretary is authorized to purchase fee simple title to all 
properties located within the boundaries, and necessary for the 
operation, of the Proctor Lake project, Texas, authorized by section 
203 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1259).
SEC. 3154. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
    The project for flood control, San Antonio Channel, Texas, 
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 
1259) as part of the comprehensive plan for flood protection on the 
Guadalupe and San Antonio Rivers in Texas and modified by section 103 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2921) and 
section 335 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
2611), is modified to authorize the Secretary to credit, in accordance 
with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
design and construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
for the project.
SEC. 3155. CONNECTICUT RIVER RESTORATION, VERMONT.
    Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-5b), as in effect on August 5, 2005, with respect to the 
study entitled ``Connecticut River Restoration Authority'', dated May 
23, 2001, a nonprofit entity may act as the non-Federal interest for 
purposes of carrying out the activities described in the agreement 
executed between The Nature Conservancy and the Department of the Army 
on August 5, 2005.
SEC. 3156. DAM REMEDIATION, VERMONT.
    Section 543 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2673) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a)(2) by striking ``and'' at the end;
        (2) in subsection (a)(3) by striking the period at the end and 
    inserting ``; and'';
        (3) by adding at the end of subsection (a) the following:
        ``(4) may carry out measures to restore, protect, and preserve 
    an ecosystem affected by a dam described in subsection (b).''; and
        (4) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following:
        ``(11) Camp Wapanacki, Hardwick.
        ``(12) Star Lake Dam, Mt. Holly.
        ``(13) Curtis Pond, Calais.
        ``(14) Weathersfield Reservoir, Springfield.
        ``(15) Burr Pond, Sudbury.
        ``(16) Maidstone Lake, Guildhall.
        ``(17) Upper and Lower Hurricane Dam.
        ``(18) Lake Fairlee.
        ``(19) West Charleston Dam.
        ``(20) White River, Sharon.''.
SEC. 3157. LAKE CHAMPLAIN EURASIAN MILFOIL, WATER CHESTNUT, AND OTHER 
NONNATIVE PLANT CONTROL, VERMONT.
    Under authority of section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
(33 U.S.C. 610), the Secretary may revise the existing General Design 
Memorandum to permit the use of chemical means of control, when 
appropriate, of Eurasian milfoil, water chestnuts, and other nonnative 
plants in the Lake Champlain basin, Vermont.
SEC. 3158. UPPER CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN WETLAND RESTORATION, VERMONT 
AND NEW HAMPSHIRE.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the States of 
Vermont and New Hampshire, shall carry out a study and develop a 
strategy for the use of wetland restoration, soil and water 
conservation practices, and nonstructural measures to reduce flood 
damage, improve water quality, and create wildlife habitat in the Upper 
Connecticut River watershed.
    (b) Cooperative Agreements.--In conducting the study and developing 
the strategy under this section, the Secretary may enter into one or 
more cooperative agreements to provide technical assistance to 
appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies and nonprofit 
organizations with wetland restoration experience. Such assistance may 
include assistance for the implementation of wetland restoration 
projects and soil and water conservation measures.
    (c) Implementation.--The Secretary shall carry out development and 
implementation of the strategy under this section in cooperation with 
local landowners and local government officials.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.
SEC. 3159. UPPER CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, VERMONT 
AND NEW HAMPSHIRE.
    (a) General Management Plan Development.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
    Secretary of Agriculture and in consultation with the States of 
    Vermont and New Hampshire and the Connecticut River Joint 
    Commission, shall conduct a study and develop a general management 
    plan for ecosystem restoration of the Upper Connecticut River 
    ecosystem for the purposes of--
            (A) habitat protection and restoration;
            (B) streambank stabilization;
            (C) restoration of stream stability;
            (D) water quality improvement;
            (E) aquatic nuisance species control;
            (F) wetland restoration;
            (G) fish passage; and
            (H) natural flow restoration.
        (2) Existing plans.--In developing the general management plan, 
    the Secretary shall depend heavily on existing plans for the 
    restoration of the Upper Connecticut River.
    (b) Critical Restoration Projects.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in any critical 
    restoration project in the Upper Connecticut River basin in 
    accordance with the general management plan developed under 
    subsection (a).
        (2) Eligible projects.--A critical restoration project shall be 
    eligible for assistance under this section if the project--
            (A) meets the purposes described in the general management 
        plan developed under subsection (a); and
            (B) with respect to the Upper Connecticut River and Upper 
        Connecticut River watershed, consists of--
                (i) bank stabilization of the main stem, tributaries, 
            and streams;
                (ii) wetland restoration and migratory bird habitat 
            restoration;
                (iii) soil and water conservation;
                (iv) restoration of natural flows;
                (v) restoration of stream stability;
                (vi) implementation of an intergovernmental agreement 
            for coordinating ecosystem restoration, fish passage 
            installation, streambank stabilization, wetland 
            restoration, habitat protection and restoration, or natural 
            flow restoration;
                (vii) water quality improvement;
                (viii) aquatic nuisance species control;
                (ix) improvements in fish migration; and
                (x) conduct of any other project or activity determined 
            to be appropriate by the Secretary.
    (c) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary may enter into one or more cooperative agreements to provide 
financial assistance to appropriate Federal, State, or local 
governments or nonprofit agencies. Such assistance may include 
assistance for the implementation of projects to be carried out under 
subsection (b).
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.
SEC. 3160. LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED, VERMONT AND NEW YORK.
    Section 542 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2671) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (b)(2)--
            (A) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (D);
            (B) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (G); 
        and
            (C) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following:
            ``(E) river corridor assessment, protection, management, 
        and restoration for the purposes of ecosystem restoration;
            ``(F) geographic mapping conducted by the Secretary using 
        existing technical capacity to produce a high-resolution, 
        multispectral satellite imagery-based land use and cover data 
        set; or'';
        (2) in subsection (e)(2)(A)--
            (A) by striking ``The non-Federal'' and inserting the 
        following:
                ``(i) In general.--The non-Federal''; and
            (B) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(ii) Approval of district engineer.--Approval of 
            credit for design work of less than $100,000 shall be 
            determined by the appropriate district engineer.'';
        (3) in subsection (e)(2)(C) by striking ``up to 50 percent 
    of''; and
        (4) in subsection (g) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting 
    ``$32,000,000''.
SEC. 3161. SANDBRIDGE BEACH, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.
    The project for beach erosion control and hurricane protection, 
Sandbridge Beach, Virginia Beach, Virginia, authorized by section 
101(22) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4804) 
and modified by section 338 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2000 (114 Stat. 2612), is modified to authorize the Secretary to review 
the project to determine whether any additional Federal interest exists 
with respect to the project, taking into consideration conditions and 
development levels relating to the project in existence on the date of 
enactment of this Act.
SEC. 3162. TANGIER ISLAND SEAWALL, VIRGINIA.
    Section 577(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3789) is amended by striking ``at a total cost of $1,200,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $900,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $300,000.'' and inserting ``at a total cost of $3,600,000.''.
SEC. 3163. DUWAMISH/GREEN, WASHINGTON.
    The project for ecosystem restoration, Duwamish/Green, Washington, 
authorized by section 101(b)(26) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 2000 (114 Stat. 2579), is modified--
        (1) to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with 
    section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
    toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
    work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before 
    the date of the partnership agreement for the project; and
        (2) to authorize the non-Federal interest to provide any 
    portion of the non-Federal share of the cost of the project in the 
    form of in-kind services and materials.
SEC. 3164. MCNARY LOCK AND DAM, MCNARY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, 
WASHINGTON AND IDAHO.
    (a) Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction.--Administrative 
jurisdiction over the land acquired for the McNary Lock and Dam project 
and managed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service under 
cooperative agreement number DACW68-4-00-13 with the Corps of 
Engineers, Walla Walla District, is transferred from the Secretary to 
the Secretary of the Interior.
    (b) Easements.--The transfer of administrative jurisdiction under 
paragraph (1) shall be subject to easements in existence as of the date 
of enactment of this Act on land subject to the transfer.
    (c) Rights of Secretary.--
        (1) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph (C), the 
    Secretary shall retain rights described in subparagraph (B) with 
    respect to the land for which administrative jurisdiction is 
    transferred under paragraph (1).
        (2) Rights.--The rights of the Secretary referred to in 
    paragraph (1) are the rights--
            (A) to flood land described in subsection (a) to the 
        standard project flood elevation;
            (B) to manipulate the level of the McNary project pool;
            (C) to access land described in subsection (a) as may be 
        required to install, maintain, and inspect sediment ranges and 
        carry out similar activities;
            (D) to construct and develop wetland, riparian habitat, or 
        other environmental restoration features authorized by section 
        1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        2309a) and section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act 
        of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330);
            (E) to dredge and deposit fill materials; and
            (F) to carry out management actions for the purpose of 
        reducing the take of juvenile salmonids by avian colonies that 
        inhabit, before, on, or after the date of enactment of this 
        Act, any island included in the land described in subsection 
        (a).
        (3) Coordination.--Before exercising a right described in any 
    of subparagraphs (C) through (F) of paragraph (2), the Secretary 
    shall coordinate the exercise with the Director of the United 
    States Fish and Wildlife Service.
    (d) Management.--
        (1) In general.--The land described in subsection (a) shall be 
    managed by the Secretary of the Interior as part of the McNary 
    National Wildlife Refuge.
        (2) Cummins property.--
            (A) Retention of credits.--Habitat unit credits described 
        in the memorandum entitled ``Design Memorandum No. 6, LOWER 
        SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, Wildlife 
        Compensation and Fishing Access Site Selection, Letter 
        Supplement No. 15, SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE WALLULA HMU'' 
        provided for the Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife 
        Compensation Plan through development of the parcel of land 
        formerly known as the ``Cummins property'' shall be retained by 
        the Secretary despite any changes in management of the parcel 
        on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
            (B) Site development plan.--The Director shall obtain prior 
        approval of the Washington State department of fish and 
        wildlife for any change to the previously approved site 
        development plan for the parcel of land formerly known as the 
        ``Cummins property''.
        (3) Madame dorian recreation area.--The Director shall continue 
    operation of the Madame Dorian Recreation Area for public use and 
    boater access.
    (e) Administrative Costs.--The Director shall be responsible for 
all survey, environmental compliance, and other administrative costs 
required to implement the transfer of administrative jurisdiction under 
subsection (a).
SEC. 3165. SNAKE RIVER PROJECT, WASHINGTON AND IDAHO.
    (a) In General.--The fish and wildlife compensation plan for the 
Lower Snake River, Washington and Idaho, as authorized by section 102 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2921), is 
amended to authorize the Secretary to conduct studies and implement 
aquatic and riparian ecosystem restorations and improvements 
specifically for fisheries and wildlife.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 3166. YAKIMA RIVER, PORT OF SUNNYSIDE, WASHINGTON.
    The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Yakima River, Port 
of Sunnyside, Washington, being carried out under section 206 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to credit, in accordance with section 221 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried out 
by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 3167. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.
    Section 102(ff) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4810, 110 Stat. 3726, 113 Stat. 312) is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(ff) Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia.--
        ``(1) In general.--The project for flood control, Bluestone 
    Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia, authorized by section 4 of 
    the Flood Control Act of 1938 (52 Stat. 1217) is modified to direct 
    the Secretary to implement Plan C/G, as defined in the Evaluation 
    Report of the District Engineer dated December 1996, to prohibit 
    the release of drift and debris into waters downstream of the 
    project (other than organic matter necessary to maintain and 
    enhance the biological resources of such waters and such 
    nonobtrusive items of debris as may not be economically feasible to 
    prevent being released through such project), including measures to 
    prevent the accumulation of drift and debris at the project, the 
    collection and removal of drift and debris on the segment of the 
    New River upstream of the project, and the removal (through use of 
    temporary or permanent systems) and disposal of accumulated drift 
    and debris at Bluestone Dam.
        ``(2) Cooperative agreement.--In carrying out the downstream 
    cleanup under the plan referred to in paragraph (1), the Secretary 
    may enter into a cooperative agreement with the West Virginia 
    department of environmental protection for the department to carry 
    out the cleanup, including contracting and procurement services, 
    contract administration and management, transportation and disposal 
    of collected materials, and disposal fees.
        ``(3) Initial cleanup.--The Secretary may provide the West 
    Virginia department of environmental protection up to $150,000 from 
    funds previously appropriated for this purpose for the Federal 
    share of the costs of the initial cleanup under the plan.''.
SEC. 3168. GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.
    Section 579(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3790; 113 Stat. 312) is amended by striking ``$47,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$99,000,000''.
SEC. 3169. LESAGE/GREENBOTTOM SWAMP, WEST VIRGINIA.
    Section 30(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 
Stat. 4030; 114 Stat. 2678) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(d) Historic Structure.--The Secretary shall ensure the 
preservation and restoration of the structure known as the `Jenkins 
House' and the reconstruction of associated buildings and landscape 
features of such structure located within the Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp 
in accordance with the standards of the Department of the Interior for 
the treatment of historic properties. Amounts made available for 
expenditure for the project authorized by section 301(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4110) shall be available 
for the purposes of this subsection.''.
SEC. 3170. LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WEST VIRGINIA.
    The project for flood control at Milton, West Virginia, authorized 
by section 580 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3790) and modified by section 340 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2612), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project substantially in accordance with the 
draft report of the Corps of Engineers dated May 2004, at an estimated 
total cost of $57,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$42,825,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $14,275,000.
SEC. 3171. MCDOWELL COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA.
    The McDowell County nonstructural component of the project for 
flood control, Levisa and Tug Fork of the Big Sandy and Cumberland 
Rivers, West Virginia, Virginia, and Kentucky, authorized by section 
202(a) of the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (94 
Stat. 1339), is modified to direct the Secretary to take measures to 
provide protection, throughout McDowell County, West Virginia, from the 
reoccurrence of the greater of--
        (1) the April 1977 flood;
        (2) the July 2001 flood;
        (3) the May 2002 flood; or
        (4) the 100-year frequency event.
SEC. 3172. PARKERSBURG, WEST VIRGINIA.
    The Secretary is authorized to carry out the ecosystem restoration, 
recreation, and flood control components of the report of the Corps of 
Engineers, entitled ``Parkersburg/Vienna Riverfront Park Feasibility 
Study'', dated June 1998, as amended by the limited reevaluation report 
of the Corps of Engineers, dated March 2004, at a total cost of 
$12,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $6,000,000, and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $6,000,000.
SEC. 3173. GREEN BAY HARBOR, GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN.
    The portion of the inner harbor of the Federal navigation channel 
of the Green Bay Harbor project, authorized by the first section of the 
Act entitled ``An Act making appropriations for the construction, 
repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, 
and for other purposes'', approved July 5, 1884 (23 Stat. 136), from 
Station 190+00 to Station 378+00 is authorized to a width of 75 feet 
and a depth of 6 feet.
SEC. 3174. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WISCONSIN.
    The project for navigation, Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin, authorized 
by the River and Harbor Act of August 30, 1852 (10 Stat. 58), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to deepen the upstream reach of the 
navigation channel from 12 feet to 18 feet, at a total cost of 
$405,000.
SEC. 3175. MISSISSIPPI RIVER HEADWATERS RESERVOIRS.
    Section 21 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 
Stat. 4027) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a)--
            (A) by striking ``1276.42'' and inserting ``1278.42'';
            (B) by striking ``1218.31'' and inserting ``1221.31''; and
            (C) by striking ``1234.82'' and inserting ``1235.30''; and
        (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Exception.--The Secretary may operate the headwaters 
reservoirs below the minimum or above the maximum water levels 
established in subsection (a) in accordance with water control 
regulation manuals (or revisions thereto) developed by the Secretary, 
after consultation with the Governor of Minnesota and affected tribal 
governments, landowners, and commercial and recreational users. The 
water control regulation manuals (and any revisions thereto) shall be 
effective when the Secretary transmits them to Congress. The Secretary 
shall report to Congress at least 14 days before operating any such 
headwaters reservoir below the minimum or above the maximum water level 
limits specified in subsection (a); except that notification is not 
required for operations necessary to prevent the loss of life or to 
ensure the safety of the dam or if the drawdown of lake levels is in 
anticipation of flood control operations.''.
SEC. 3176. UPPER BASIN OF MISSOURI RIVER.
    (a) Use of Funds.--Notwithstanding the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103), funds made available for 
recovery or mitigation activities in the lower basin of the Missouri 
River may be used for recovery or mitigation activities in the upper 
basin of the Missouri River, including the States of Montana, Nebraska, 
North Dakota, and South Dakota.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The matter under the heading ``Missouri 
River Mitigation, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and Nebraska'' of section 
601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4143), 
as modified by section 334 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 306), is amended by adding at the end the following: 
``The Secretary may carry out any recovery or mitigation activities in 
the upper basin of the Missouri River, including the States of Montana, 
Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota, using funds made available 
under this paragraph in accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 
1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and consistent with the project purposes 
of the Missouri River Mainstem System as authorized by section 10 of 
the Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 897).''.
SEC. 3177. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
PROGRAM.
    Section 1103(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(1)(A)(ii)) is amended by inserting before the 
period at the end the following: ``, including research on water 
quality issues affecting the Mississippi River (including elevated 
nutrient levels) and the development of remediation strategies''.
SEC. 3178. UPPER OHIO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES NAVIGATION SYSTEM NEW 
TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAM.
    (a) Upper Ohio River and Tributaries Navigation System Defined.--In 
this section, the term ``Upper Ohio River and Tributaries navigation 
system'' means the Allegheny, Kanawha, Monongahela, and Ohio Rivers.
    (b) Establishment.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a pilot program 
    to evaluate new technologies applicable to the Upper Ohio River and 
    Tributaries navigation system.
        (2) Inclusions.--The program may include the design, 
    construction, or implementation of innovative technologies and 
    solutions for the Upper Ohio River and Tributaries navigation 
    system, including projects for--
            (A) improved navigation;
            (B) environmental stewardship;
            (C) increased navigation reliability; and
            (D) reduced navigation costs.
        (3) Purposes.--The purposes of the program shall be--
            (A) to increase the reliability and availability of 
        federally owned and federally operated navigation facilities;
            (B) to decrease system operational risks; and
            (C) to improve--
                (i) vessel traffic management;
                (ii) access; and
                (iii) Federal asset management.
    (c) Federal Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
federally owned.
    (d) Local Cooperation Agreements.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into local 
    cooperation agreements with non-Federal interests to provide for 
    the design, construction, installation, and operation of the 
    projects to be carried out under the program.
        (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
    into under this subsection shall include the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a navigation 
        improvement project, including appropriate engineering plans 
        and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project.
        (3) Cost sharing.--Total project costs under each local 
    cooperation agreement shall be cost-shared in accordance with the 
    formula relating to the applicable original construction project.
        (4) Expenditures.--
            (A) In general.--Expenditures under the program may 
        include, for establishment at federally owned property, such as 
        locks, dams, and bridges--
                (i) transmitters;
                (ii) responders;
                (iii) hardware;
                (iv) software; and
                (v) wireless networks.
            (B) Exclusions.--Transmitters, responders, hardware, 
        software, and wireless networks and other equipment installed 
        on privately owned vessels or equipment shall not be eligible 
        under the program.
    (e) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2008, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report on the results of the pilot program carried 
out under this section, together with recommendations concerning 
whether the program or any component of the program should be 
implemented on a national basis.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,100,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.
SEC. 3179. CONTINUATION OF PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.
    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 1001(b)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)), the following 
projects shall remain authorized to be carried out by the Secretary:
        (1) The project for navigation, Sacramento Deep Water Ship 
    Channel, California, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092).
        (2) The project for flood control, Agana River, Guam, 
    authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act 
    of 1986 (100 Stat. 4127).
        (3) The project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor and Channels, 
    Maryland and Virginia, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
    Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1818).
        (4) The project for navigation, Fall River Harbor, 
    Massachusetts, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
    Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731); except that the authorized depth of 
    that portion of the project extending riverward of the Charles M. 
    Braga, Jr. Memorial Bridge, Fall River and Somerset, Massachusetts, 
    shall not exceed 35 feet.
        (5) The project for flood control, Ecorse Creek, Wayne County, 
    Michigan, authorized by section 101(a)(14) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607).
    (b) Limitation.--A project described in subsection (a) shall not be 
authorized for construction after the last day of the 5-year period 
beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, unless, during such 
period, funds have been obligated for the construction (including 
planning and design) of the project.
SEC. 3180. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.
    Each of the following projects may be carried out by the Secretary 
and no construction on any such project may be initiated until the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible:
        (1) Menominee harbor and river, michigan and wisconsin.--The 
    project for navigation, Menominee Harbor and River, Michigan and 
    Wisconsin, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 
    1960 (74 Stat. 482) and deauthorized on April 15, 2002, in 
    accordance with section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)).
        (2) Hearding island inlet, duluth harbor, minnesota.--The 
    project for dredging, Hearding Island Inlet, Duluth Harbor, 
    Minnesota, authorized by section 22 of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4027).
        (3) Manitowoc harbor, wisconsin.--That portion of the project 
    for navigation, Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin, authorized by the 
    first section of the River and Harbor Act of August 30, 1852 (10 
    Stat. 58), consisting of the channel in the south part of the outer 
    harbor, deauthorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 
    1962 (76 Stat. 1176).
SEC. 3181. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.
    (a) In General.--The following projects are not authorized after 
the date of enactment of this Act:
        (1) Bridgeport harbor, connecticut.--The portion of the project 
    for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the 
    first section of the River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 
    919), consisting of an 18-foot channel in Yellow Mill River and 
    described as follows: Beginning at a point along the eastern limit 
    of the existing project, N123,649.75, E481,920.54, thence running 
    northwesterly about 52.64 feet to a point N123,683.03, E481,879.75, 
    thence running northeasterly about 1,442.21 feet to a point 
    N125,030.08, E482,394.96, thence running northeasterly about 139.52 
    feet to a point along the eastern limit of the existing channel, 
    N125,133.87, E482,488.19, thence running southwesterly about 
    1,588.98 feet to the point of origin.
        (2) Mystic river, connecticut.--The portion of the project for 
    navigation, Mystic River, Connecticut, authorized by the first 
    section of the River and Harbor Appropriations Act of September 19, 
    1890 (26 Stat. 436) consisting of a 12-foot-deep channel, 
    approximately 7,554 square feet in area, starting at a point 
    N193,086.51, E815,092.78, thence running north 59 degrees 21 
    minutes 46.63 seconds west about 138.05 feet to a point 
    N193,156.86, E814,974.00, thence running north 51 degrees 04 
    minutes 39.00 seconds west about 166.57 feet to a point 
    N193,261.51, E814,844.41, thence running north 43 degrees 01 
    minutes 34.90 seconds west about 86.23 feet to a point N193,324.55, 
    E814,785.57, thence running north 06 degrees 42 minutes 03.86 
    seconds west about 156.57 feet to a point N193,480.05, E814,767.30, 
    thence running south 21 degrees 21 minutes 17.94 seconds east about 
    231.42 feet to a point N193,264.52, E814,851.57, thence running 
    south 53 degrees 34 minutes 23.28 seconds east about 299.78 feet to 
    the point of origin.
        (3) Norwalk harbor, connecticut.--
            (A) In general.--The portions of a 10-foot channel of the 
        project for navigation, Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut, authorized 
        by the first section of the Act of March 2, 1919 (40 Stat. 
        1276) and described in subparagraph (B).
            (B) Description of portions.--The portions of the channel 
        referred to in subparagraph (A) are as follows:
                (i) Rectangular portion.--An approximately rectangular-
            shaped section along the northwesterly terminus of the 
            channel. The section is 35-feet wide and about 460-feet 
            long and is further described as commencing at a point 
            N104,165.85, E417,662.71, thence running south 24 degrees 
            06 minutes 55 seconds east 395.00 feet to a point 
            N103,805.32, E417,824.10, thence running south 00 degrees 
            38 minutes 06 seconds east 87.84 feet to a point 
            N103,717.49, E417,825.07, thence running north 24 degrees 
            06 minutes 55 seconds west 480.00 feet, to a point 
            N104,155.59, E417,628.96, thence running north 73 degrees 
            05 minutes 25 seconds east 35.28 feet to the point of 
            origin.
                (ii) Parallelogram-shaped portion.--An area having the 
            approximate shape of a parallelogram along the 
            northeasterly portion of the channel, southeast of the area 
            described in clause (i), approximately 20 feet wide and 260 
            feet long, and further described as commencing at a point 
            N103,855.48, E417,849.99, thence running south 33 degrees 
            07 minutes 30 seconds east 133.40 feet to a point 
            N103,743.76, E417,922.89, thence running south 24 degrees 
            07 minutes 04 seconds east 127.75 feet to a point 
            N103,627.16, E417,975.09, thence running north 33 degrees 
            07 minutes 30 seconds west 190.00 feet to a point 
            N103,786.28, E417,871.26, thence running north 17 degrees 
            05 minutes 15 seconds west 72.39 feet to the point of 
            origin.
            (C) Exclusion.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
        paragraph, the Secretary shall realign the 10-foot channel 
        potion of the project referred to in subparagraph (A) to 
        include, immediately north of the area described in 
        subparagraph (B)(ii), a triangular section described as 
        commencing at a point N103,968.35, E417,815.29, thence running 
        south 17 degrees 05 minutes 15 seconds east 118.09 feet to a 
        point N103,855.48, E417,849.99, thence running north 33 degrees 
        07 minutes 30 seconds west 36.76 feet to a point N103,886.27, 
        E417,829.90, thence running north 10 degrees 05 minutes 26 
        seconds west 83.37 feet to the point of origin.
        (4) Rockland harbor, maine.--The portion of the project for 
    navigation, Rockland Harbor, Maine, authorized by the Act of June 
    3, 1896 (29 Stat. 202), consisting of a 14-foot channel located in 
    Lermond Cove and beginning at a point with coordinates N99,977.37, 
    E340,290.02, thence running easterly about 200.00 feet to a point 
    with coordinates N99,978.49, E340,490.02, thence running northerly 
    about 138.00 feet to a point with coordinates N100,116.49, 
    E340,289.25, thence running westerly about 200.00 feet to a point 
    with coordinates N100,115.37, E340,289.25, thence running southerly 
    about 138.00 feet to the point of origin.
        (5) Rockport harbor, maine.--
            (A) In general.--The portion of the project for navigation, 
        Rockport Harbor, Maine, authorized by the first section of the 
        Act of August 11, 1888 (25 Stat. 400), located within the 12-
        foot anchorage described in subparagraph (B).
            (B) Description of anchorage.--The anchorage referred to in 
        subparagraph (A) is more particularly described as--
                (i) beginning at the westernmost point of the anchorage 
            at N128800.00, E349311.00;
                (ii) thence running north 12 degrees, 52 minutes, 37.2 
            seconds east 127.08 feet to a point N128923.88, E349339.32;
                (iii) thence running north 17 degrees, 40 minutes, 13.0 
            seconds east 338.61 feet to a point N129246.51, E349442.10;
                (iv) thence running south 89 degrees, 21 minutes, 21.0 
            seconds east 45.36 feet to a point N129246.00, E349487.46;
                (v) thence running south 44 degrees, 13 minutes, 32.6 
            seconds east 18.85 feet to a point N129232.49, E349500.61;
                (vi) thence running south 17 degrees, 40 minutes 13.0 
            seconds west 340.50 feet to a point N128908.06, E349397.25;
                (vii) thence running south 12 degrees, 52 minutes, 37.2 
            seconds west 235.41 feet to a point at N128678.57, 
            E349344.79; and
                (viii) thence running north 15 degrees, 32 minutes, 
            59.3 seconds west 126.04 feet to the point of origin.
        (6) Falmouth harbor, massachusetts.--The portion of the project 
    for navigation, Falmouth Harbor, Massachusetts, authorized by 
    section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1172), 
    beginning at a point along the eastern side of the inner harbor 
    N200,415.05, E845,307.98, thence running north 25 degrees 48 
    minutes 54.3 seconds east 160.24 feet to a point N200,559.20, 
    E845,377.76, thence running north 22 degrees 7 minutes 52.4 seconds 
    east 596.82 feet to a point N201,112.15, E845,602.60, thence 
    running north 60 degrees 1 minute 0.3 seconds east 83.18 feet to a 
    point N201,153.72, E845,674.65, thence running south 24 degrees 56 
    minutes 43.4 seconds west 665.01 feet to a point N200,550.75, 
    E845,394.18, thence running south 32 degrees 25 minutes 29.0 
    seconds west 160.76 feet to the point of origin.
        (7) Island end river, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
    project for navigation, Island End River, Massachusetts, carried 
    out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
    U.S.C. 577), described as follows: Beginning at a point along the 
    eastern limit of the existing project, N507,348.98, E721,180.01, 
    thence running northeast about 35 feet to a point N507,384.17, 
    E721,183.36, thence running northeast about 324 feet to a point 
    N507,590.51, E721,433.17, thence running northeast about 345 feet 
    to a point along the northern limit of the existing project, 
    N507,927.29, E721,510.29, thence running southeast about 25 feet to 
    a point N507,921.71, E721,534.66, thence running southwest about 
    354 feet to a point N507,576.65, E721,455.64, thence running 
    southwest about 357 feet to the point of origin.
        (8) City waterway, tacoma, washington.--The portion of the 
    project for navigation, City Waterway, Tacoma, Washington, 
    authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor 
    Appropriations Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 347), consisting of 
    the last 1,000 linear feet of the inner portion of the waterway 
    beginning at station 70+00 and ending at station 80+00.
        (9) Aunt lydia's cove, massachusetts.--
            (A) In general.--The portion of the project for navigation, 
        Aunt Lydia's Cove, Massachusetts, constructed under section 107 
        of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), consisting 
        of the 8-foot deep anchorage in the cove described in 
        subparagraph (B).
            (B) Description of portion.--The portion of the project 
        described in subparagraph (A) is more particularly described as 
        the portion beginning at a point along the southern limit of 
        the existing project, N254,332.00, E1,023,103.96, thence 
        running northwesterly about 761.60 feet to a point along the 
        western limit of the existing project N255,076.84, 
        E1,022,945.07, thence running southwesterly about 38.11 feet to 
        a point N255,038.99, E1,022,940.60, thence running 
        southeasterly about 267.07 feet to a point N254,772.00, 
        E1,022,947.00, thence running southeasterly about 462.41 feet 
        to a point N254,320.06, E1,023,044.84, thence running 
        northeasterly about 60.31 feet to the point of origin.
        (10) Whatcom creek waterway, bellingham, washington.--The 
    portion of the project for navigation, Whatcom Creek Waterway, 
    Bellingham, Washington, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 
    June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 664), and section 101 of the River and 
    Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 299), consisting of the last 2,900 
    linear feet of the inner portion of the waterway and beginning at 
    station 29+00 to station 0+00.
        (11) Oconto harbor, wisconsin.--
            (A) In general.--The portion of the project for navigation, 
        Oconto Harbor, Wisconsin, authorized by the Act of August 2, 
        1882 (22 Stat. 196), and the Act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 
        664) (commonly known as the ``River and Harbor Act of 1910''), 
        consisting of a 15-foot-deep turning basin in the Oconto River, 
        as described in subparagraph (B).
            (B) Project description.--The project referred to in 
        subparagraph (B) is more particularly described as--
                (i) beginning at a point along the western limit of the 
            existing project, N394,086.71, E2,530,202.71;
                (ii) thence northeasterly about 619.93 feet to a point 
            N394,459.10, E2,530,698.33;
                (iii) thence southeasterly about 186.06 feet to a point 
            N394,299.20, E2,530,793.47;
                (iv) thence southwesterly about 355.07 feet to a point 
            N393,967.13, E2,530,667.76;
                (v) thence southwesterly about 304.10 feet to a point 
            N393,826.90, E2,530,397.92; and
                (vi) thence northwesterly about 324.97 feet to the 
            point of origin.
    (b) Anchorage Area, New London Harbor, Connecticut.--The portion of 
the project for navigation, New London Harbor, Connecticut, authorized 
by the River and Harbor Appropriations Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 
333), that consists of a 23-foot waterfront channel and that is further 
described as beginning at a point along the western limit of the 
existing project, N188, 802.75, E779, 462.81, thence running 
northeasterly about 1,373.88 feet to a point N189, 554.87, E780, 
612.53, thence running southeasterly about 439.54 feet to a point N189, 
319.88, E780, 983.98, thence running southwesterly about 831.58 feet to 
a point N188, 864.63, E780, 288.08, thence running southeasterly about 
567.39 feet to a point N188, 301.88, E780, 360.49, thence running 
northwesterly about 1,027.96 feet to the point of origin, is 
redesignated as an anchorage area.
    (c) Southport Harbor, Fairfield, Connecticut.--The project for 
navigation, Southport Harbor, Fairfield, Connecticut, authorized by 
section 2 of the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1829, and by the 
first section of the River and Harbor Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 
1029), and section 364 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3733-3734), is modified to redesignate a portion of the 9-
foot-deep channel to an anchorage area, approximately 900 feet in 
length and 90,000 square feet in area, and lying generally north of a 
line with points at coordinates N108,043.45, E452,252.04 and 
N107,938.74, E452,265.74.
    (d) Saco River, Maine.--The portion of the project for navigation, 
Saco River, Maine, constructed under section 107 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and described as a 6-foot deep, 10-
acre maneuvering basin located at the head of navigation, is 
redesignated as an anchorage area.
    (e) Union River, Maine.--The project for navigation, Union River, 
Maine, authorized by the first section of the Act of June 3, 1896 (29 
Stat. 215), is modified by redesignating as an anchorage area that 
portion of the project consisting of a 6-foot turning basin and lying 
northerly of a line commencing at a point N315,975.13, E1,004,424.86, 
thence running north 61 degrees 27 minutes 20.71 seconds west about 
132.34 feet to a point N316,038.37, E1,004,308.61.
    (f) Mystic River, Massachusetts.--The portion of the project for 
navigation, Mystic River, Massachusetts, authorized by the first 
section of the River and Harbor Appropriations Act of July 13, 1892 (27 
Stat. 96), between a line starting at a point N515,683.77, E707,035.45 
and ending at a point N515,721.28, E707,069.85 and a line starting at a 
point N514,595.15, E707,746.15 and ending at a point N514,732.94, 
E707,658.38 shall be relocated and reduced from a 100-foot wide channel 
to a 50-foot wide channel after the date of enactment of this Act 
described as follows: Beginning at a point N515,721.28, E707,069.85, 
thence running southeasterly about 840.50 feet to a point N515,070.16, 
E707,601.27, thence running southeasterly about 177.54 feet to a point 
N514,904.84, E707,665.98, thence running southeasterly about 319.90 
feet to a point with coordinates N514,595.15, E707,746.15, thence 
running northwesterly about 163.37 feet to a point N514,732.94, 
E707,658.38, thence running northwesterly about 161.58 feet to a point 
N514.889.47, E707,618.30, thence running northwesterly about 166.61 
feet to a point N515.044.62, E707,557.58, thence running northwesterly 
about 825.31 feet to a point N515,683.77, E707,035.45, thence running 
northeasterly about 50.90 feet returning to a point N515,721.28, 
E707,069.85.
    (g) Rivercenter, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.--Section 38(c) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (33 U.S.C. 59j-1; 102 Stat. 
4038) is amended by striking ``subsection (a) of this section'' and 
inserting ``subsection (a) (except 30 years from such date of 
enactment, in the case of the area or any part thereof described in 
subsection (a)(5))''.
    (h) Additional Deauthorizations.--The following projects are not 
authorized after the date of enactment of this Act, except with respect 
to any portion of such a project which portion has been completed 
before such date or is under construction on such date:
        (1) The project for flood protection on Atascadero Creek and 
    its tributaries of Goleta, California, authorized by section 201 of 
    the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1826).
        (2) The project for the construction of bridge fenders for the 
    Summit and St. Georges Bridge for the Inland Waterway of the 
    Delaware River to the C & D Canal of the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware 
    and Maryland, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1954 (68 
    Stat. 1249).
        (3) The project for flood control, central and southern 
    Florida, Shingle Creek basin, Florida, authorized by section 203 of 
    the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1182).
        (4) The project for flood control, Brevoort, Indiana, 
    authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 
    (49 Stat. 1587).
        (5) The project for flood control, Middle Wabash, Greenfield 
    Bayou, Indiana, authorized by section 10 of the Flood Control Act 
    of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 649).
        (6) The project for flood damage reduction, Lake George, 
    Hobart, Indiana, authorized by section 602(a)(2) of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148).
        (7) The project for navigation at the Muscatine Harbor on the 
    Mississippi River at Muscatine, Iowa, authorized by section 101 of 
    the River and Harbor Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 166).
        (8) The project for flood control and water supply, Eagle Creek 
    Lake, Kentucky, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act 
    of 1962 (76 Stat. 1188).
        (9) The project for flood control, Hazard, Kentucky, authorized 
    by section 3(a)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 
    (100 Stat. 4014) and section 108 of the Water Resources Development 
    Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4621).
        (10) The project for flood control, western Kentucky 
    tributaries, Kentucky, authorized by section 204 of the Flood 
    Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1076) and modified by section 210 of 
    the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1829).
        (11) The project for flood damage reduction, Tensas-Cocodrie 
    area, Louisiana, authorized by section 3 of the Flood Control Act 
    of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 643).
        (12) The uncompleted portions of the project for navigation 
    improvement for Bayou LaFourche and LaFourche Jump, Louisiana, 
    authorized by the Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1033), and the 
    River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 481).
        (13) The project for flood control, Eastern Rapides and South-
    Central Avoyelles Parishes, Louisiana, authorized by section 201 of 
    the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1825).
        (14) The project for erosion protection and recreation, Fort 
    Livingston, Grande Terre Island, Louisiana, authorized by the Act 
    of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426e et seq.).
        (15) The project for navigation, Northeast Harbor, Maine, 
    authorized by section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 12).
        (16) The project for navigation, Tenants Harbor, Maine, 
    authorized by the first section of the Act of March 2, 1919 (40 
    Stat. 1275).
        (17) The project for navigation, New York Harbor and adjacent 
    channels, Claremont Terminal, Jersey City, New Jersey, authorized 
    by section 202(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
    (100 Stat. 4098).
        (18) The project for navigation, Olcott Harbor, Lake Ontario, 
    New York, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4143).
        (19) The project for navigation, Outer Harbor, Buffalo, New 
    York, authorized by section 110 of the Water Resources Development 
    Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4817).
        (20) The project for the Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, 
    Hammond, Oregon, authorized by title I of the Energy and Water 
    Development Appropriations Act, 1991 (104 Stat. 2078).
        (21) The project for navigation, Narragansett Town Beach, 
    Narragansett, Rhode Island, authorized by section 361 of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4861).
        (22) The project for bulkhead repairs, Quonset Point-
    Davisville, Rhode Island, authorized by section 571 of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3788).
        (23) The structural portion of the project for flood control, 
    Cypress Creek, Texas, authorized by section 3(a)(13) of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014).
        (24) The project for flood protection, East Fork Channel 
    Improvement, Increment 2, East Fork of the Trinity River, Texas, 
    authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 
    Stat. 1185).
        (25) The project for flood control, Falfurrias, Texas, 
    authorized by section 3(a)(14) of the Water Resources Development 
    Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014).
        (26) The project for flood control, Pecan Bayou Lake, Texas, 
    authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (82 
    Stat. 742).
        (27) The project for navigation improvements affecting Lake of 
    the Pines, Texas, for the portion of the Red River below Fulton, 
    Arkansas, authorized by the Act of July 13, 1892 (27 Stat. 103) and 
    modified by the Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 635), the Act of May 
    17, 1950 (64 Stat. 163), and the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 
    Stat. 731).
        (28) The project for navigation, Tennessee Colony Lake, Trinity 
    River, Texas, authorized by section 204 of the River and Harbor Act 
    of 1965 (79 Stat. 1091).
        (29) The project for streambank erosion, Kanawha River, 
    Charleston, West Virginia, authorized by section 603(f)(13) of the 
    Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4153).
SEC. 3182. LAND CONVEYANCES.
    (a) St. Francis Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the State of 
    Arkansas, without monetary consideration and subject to paragraph 
    (2), all right, title, and interest in and to real property within 
    the State acquired by the Federal Government as mitigation land for 
    the project for flood control, St. Francis Basin, Arkansas and 
    Missouri Project, authorized by the Flood Control Act of May 15, 
    1928 (33 U.S.C. 702a et seq.).
        (2) Terms and conditions.--
            (A) In general.--The conveyance by the United States under 
        this subsection shall be subject to--
                (i) the condition that the State of Arkansas agree to 
            operate, maintain, and manage the real property for fish 
            and wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes at no 
            cost or expense to the United States; and
                (ii) such other terms and conditions as the Secretary 
            determines to be in the interest of the United States.
            (B) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the real 
        property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in 
        public ownership or the State ceases to operate, maintain, and 
        manage the real property in accordance with this subsection, 
        all right, title, and interest in and to the property shall 
        revert to the United States, at the option of the Secretary.
        (3) Mitigation.--Nothing in this subsection extinguishes the 
    responsibility of the Federal Government or the non-Federal 
    interest for the project referred to in paragraph (1) from the 
    obligation to implement mitigation for such project that existed on 
    the day prior to the transfer authorized by this subsection.
    (b) Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal, California.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary may convey, by separate 
    quitclaim deeds, as soon as the conveyance of each individual 
    portion is practicable, the title of the United States in and to 
    all or portions of the approximately 86 acres of upland, tideland, 
    and submerged land, commonly referred to as the ``Oakland Inner 
    Harbor Tidal Canal'', California (referred to in this section as 
    the ``Canal Property''), as follows:
            (A) To the city of Oakland, without consideration, the 
        title of the United States in and to all or portions of that 
        part of the Canal Property that are located within the 
        boundaries of the City of Oakland.
            (B) To the city of Alameda, or to a public entity created 
        by or designated by the city of Alameda that is eligible to 
        hold title to real property, without consideration, the title 
        of the United States in and to all or portions of that part of 
        the Canal Property that are located within the boundaries of 
        the city of Alameda.
            (C) To the owners of lands adjacent to the Canal Property, 
        or to a public entity created by or designated by one or more 
        of the adjacent land owners that are eligible to hold title to 
        real property, at fair market value, the title of the United 
        States in and to all or portions of that part of the Canal 
        Property that are located within the boundaries of the city in 
        which the adjacent land is located.
        (2) Requirement.--The Secretary may reserve and retain from any 
    conveyance under this subsection a right-of-way or other rights as 
    the Secretary determines to be necessary for the operation and 
    maintenance of the authorized Federal channel in the Canal 
    Property.
        (3) Annual reports.--Until the date on which each conveyance 
    described in paragraph (1) is complete, the Secretary shall submit, 
    by not later than November 30 of each year, to the Committee on 
    Environment and Public Works of the Senate and Committee on 
    Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
    an annual report that describes the efforts of the Secretary to 
    complete that conveyance during the preceding fiscal year.
        (4) Form.--A conveyance made under this subsection may be, in 
    whole or in part, in the form of an easement.
        (5) Right of first refusal.--For any property on which an 
    easement is granted under this subsection, should the Secretary 
    seek to dispose of the property, the holder of the easement shall 
    have the right of first refusal to the property without cost or 
    consideration.
        (6) Repeal.--Section 205 of the Water Resources Development Act 
    of 1990 (104 Stat. 4633; 110 Stat. 3748) is repealed.
    (c) Milford, Kansas.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey by quitclaim deed 
    without consideration to the Geary County Fire Department, Milford, 
    Kansas, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and 
    to real property consisting of approximately 7.4 acres located in 
    Geary County, Kansas, for construction, operation, and maintenance 
    of a fire station.
        (2) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the real 
    property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in public 
    ownership or ceases to be operated and maintained as a fire 
    station, all right, title, and interest in and to the property 
    shall revert to the United States, at the option of the United 
    States.
    (d) Strawn Cemetery, John Redmond Lake, Kansas.--
        (1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary, acting through the Tulsa 
    District of the Corps of Engineers, shall transfer to Pleasant 
    Township, Coffey County, Kansas, for use as the New Strawn 
    Cemetery, all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
    and to the land described in paragraph (3).
        (2) Reversion.--If the land transferred under this subsection 
    ceases at any time to be used as a nonprofit cemetery or for 
    another public purpose, the land shall revert to the United States.
        (3) Description.--The land to be conveyed under this subsection 
    is a tract of land near John Redmond Lake, Kansas, containing 
    approximately 3 acres and lying adjacent to the west line of the 
    Strawn Cemetery located in the SE corner of the NE\1/4\ of section 
    32, township 20 south, range 14 east, Coffey County, Kansas.
    (e) Pike County, Missouri.--
        (1) Definitions.--In this subsection, the following definitions 
    apply:
            (A) Federal land.--The term ``Federal land'' means the 2 
        parcels of Corps of Engineers land totaling approximately 42 
        acres, located on Buffalo Island in Pike County, Missouri, and 
        consisting of Government Tract Numbers MIS-7 and a portion of 
        FM-46.
            (B) Non-federal land.--The term ``non-Federal land'' means 
        the approximately 42 acres of land, subject to any existing 
        flowage easements situated in Pike County, Missouri, upstream 
        and northwest, about 200 feet from Drake Island (also known as 
        Grimes Island).
        (2) Land exchange.--Subject to paragraph (3), on conveyance by 
    S.S.S., Inc., to the United States of all right, title, and 
    interest in and to the non-Federal land, the Secretary shall convey 
    to S.S.S., Inc., all right, title, and interest of the United 
    States in and to the Federal land.
        (3) Conditions.--
            (A) Deeds.--
                (i) Non-federal land.--The conveyance of the non-
            Federal land to the Secretary shall be by a warranty deed 
            acceptable to the Secretary.
                (ii) Federal land.--The conveyance of the Federal land 
            to S.S.S., Inc., shall be--

                    (I) by quitclaim deed; and
                    (II) subject to any reservations, terms, and 
                conditions that the Secretary determines to be 
                necessary to allow the United States to operate and 
                maintain the Mississippi River 9-Foot Navigation 
                Project.

                (iii) Legal descriptions.--The Secretary shall provide 
            a legal description of the Federal land, and S.S.S., Inc., 
            shall provide a legal description of the non-Federal land, 
            for inclusion in the deeds referred to in clauses (i) and 
            (ii).
            (B) Removal of improvements.--
                (i) In general.--The Secretary may require the removal 
            of, or S.S.S., Inc., may voluntarily remove, any 
            improvements to the non-Federal land before the completion 
            of the exchange or as a condition of the exchange.
                (ii) No liability.--If S.S.S., Inc., removes any 
            improvements to the non-Federal land under clause (i)--

                    (I) S.S.S., Inc., shall have no claim against the 
                United States relating to the removal; and
                    (II) the United States shall not incur or be liable 
                for any cost associated with the removal or relocation 
                of the improvements.

            (C) Administrative costs.--The Secretary shall require 
        S.S.S., Inc. to pay reasonable administrative costs associated 
        with the exchange.
            (D) Cash equalization payment.--If the appraised fair 
        market value, as determined by the Secretary, of the Federal 
        land exceeds the appraised fair market value, as determined by 
        the Secretary, of the non-Federal land, S.S.S., Inc., shall 
        make a cash equalization payment to the United States.
            (E) Deadline.--The land exchange under subparagraph (B) 
        shall be completed not later than 2 years after the date of 
        enactment of this Act.
    (f) Union Lake, Missouri.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall offer to convey to the 
    State of Missouri, before June 30, 2007, all right, title, and 
    interest in and to approximately 205.50 acres of land described in 
    paragraph (2) purchased for the Union Lake Project that was 
    deauthorized as of January 1, 1990 (55 Fed. Reg. 40906), in 
    accordance with section 1001(a) of the Water Resources Development 
    Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(a)).
        (2) Land description.--The land referred to in paragraph (1) is 
    described as follows:
            (A) Tract 500.--A tract of land situated in Franklin 
        County, Missouri, being part of the SW\1/4\ of section 7, and 
        the NW\1/4\ of the SW\1/4\ of section 8, township 42 north, 
        range 2 west of the fifth principal meridian, consisting of 
        approximately 112.50 acres.
            (B) Tract 605.--A tract of land situated in Franklin 
        County, Missouri, being part of the N\1/2\ of the NE, and part 
        of the SE of the NE of section 18, township 42 north, range 2 
        west of the fifth principal meridian, consisting of 
        approximately 93.00 acres.
        (3) Conveyance.--On acceptance by the State of Missouri of the 
    offer by the Secretary under paragraph (1), the land described in 
    paragraph (2) shall immediately be conveyed, in its current 
    condition, by Secretary to the State of Missouri.
    (g) Boardman, Oregon.--Section 501(g)(1) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3751) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``city of Boardman,'' and inserting ``the 
    Boardman Park and Recreation District, Boardman,''; and
        (2) by striking ``such city'' and inserting ``the city of 
    Boardman''.
    (h) Lookout Point Project, Lowell, Oregon.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary may convey without consideration 
    to Lowell School District, by quitclaim deed, all right, title, and 
    interest of the United States in and to land and buildings thereon, 
    known as Tract A-82, located in Lowell, Oregon, and described in 
    paragraph (2).
        (2) Description of property.--The parcel of land authorized to 
    be conveyed under paragraph (1) is as follows: Commencing at the 
    point of intersection of the west line of Pioneer Street with the 
    westerly extension of the north line of Summit Street, in Meadows 
    Addition to Lowell, as platted and recorded at page 56 of Volume 4, 
    Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence north on the west line of 
    Pioneer Street a distance of 176.0 feet to the true point of 
    beginning of this description; thence north on the west line of 
    Pioneer Street a distance of 170.0 feet; thence west at right 
    angles to the west line of Pioneer Street a distance of 250.0 feet; 
    thence south and parallel to the west line of Pioneer Street a 
    distance of 170.0 feet; thence east 250.0 feet to the true point of 
    beginning of this description in Section 14, Township 19 South, 
    Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Lane County, Oregon.
        (3) Terms and conditions.--Before conveying the parcel to the 
    school district, the Secretary shall ensure that the conditions of 
    buildings and facilities meet the requirements of applicable 
    Federal law.
        (4) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the property 
    conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in public ownership, 
    all right, title, and interest in and to the property shall revert 
    to the United States, at the option of the United States.
    (i) Richard B. Russell Lake, South Carolina.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey, at fair market 
    value, to the State of South Carolina, by quitclaim deed, all 
    right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
    parcels of land described in paragraph (2)(A) that are managed, as 
    of the date of enactment of this Act, by the South Carolina 
    department of commerce for public recreation purposes for the 
    Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, South Carolina, project authorized 
    by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1420).
        (2) Land description.--
            (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraphs (B) and (C), the 
        parcels of land referred to in paragraph (1) are the parcels 
        contained in the portion of land described in Army Lease Number 
        DACW21-1-92-0500.
            (B) Retention of interests.--The United States shall 
        retain--
                (i) ownership of all land included in the lease 
            referred to in subparagraph (A) that would have been 
            acquired for operational purposes in accordance with the 
            1971 implementation of the 1962 Army/Interior Joint 
            Acquisition Policy; and
                (ii) such other land as is determined by the Secretary 
            to be required for authorized project purposes, including 
            easement rights-of-way to remaining Federal land.
            (C) Survey.--The cost of the survey shall be paid by the 
        State.
        (3) Costs of conveyance.--
            (A) In general.--The State shall be responsible for all 
        costs, including real estate transaction and environmental 
        costs, associated with the conveyance under this subsection.
            (B) Form of contribution.--As determined appropriate by the 
        Secretary, in lieu of payment of compensation to the United 
        States under subparagraph (A), the State may perform certain 
        environmental or real estate actions associated with the 
        conveyance under this subsection if those actions are performed 
        in close coordination with, to the satisfaction of, and in 
        compliance with the laws of the United States.
        (4) Additional terms and conditions.--
            (A) No effect on shore management policy.--The Shoreline 
        Management Policy (ER-1130-2-406) of the Corps of Engineers may 
        not be changed or altered for any proposed development of land 
        conveyed under this subsection.
            (B) Cost sharing.--In carrying out the conveyance under 
        this subsection, the Secretary and the State shall comply with 
        all obligations of any cost sharing agreement between the 
        Secretary and the State in effect as of the date of the 
        conveyance.
            (C) Land not conveyed.--The State shall continue to manage 
        the land that is subject to Army Lease Number DACW21-1-92-0500 
        and that is not conveyed under this subsection in accordance 
        with the terms and conditions of Army Lease Number DACW21-1-92-
        0500.
    (j) Denison, Texas.--
        (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall offer to convey at fair 
    market value to the city of Denison, Texas, all right, title, and 
    interest of the United States in and to the approximately 900 acres 
    of land located in Grayson County, Texas, which is currently 
    subject to an application for lease for public park and 
    recreational purposes made by the city of Denison, dated August 17, 
    2005.
        (2) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage and 
    description of the real property referred to in paragraph (1) shall 
    be determined by a survey paid for by the city of Denison, Texas, 
    that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
        (3) Conveyance.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
    acceptance by the city of Denison, Texas, of an offer under 
    paragraph (1), the Secretary shall convey the land surveyed under 
    paragraph (2) by quitclaim deed to the city of Denison, Texas.
    (k) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
        (1) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage and 
    the legal description of any real property to be conveyed under 
    this section shall be determined by a survey that is satisfactory 
    to the Secretary.
        (2) Applicability of property screening provisions.--Section 
    2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply to any 
    conveyance under this section.
        (3) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may require 
    that any conveyance under this section be subject to such 
    additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers 
    appropriate and necessary to protect the interests of the United 
    States.
        (4) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a conveyance is 
    made under this section shall be responsible for all reasonable and 
    necessary costs, including real estate transaction and 
    environmental documentation costs, associated with the conveyance.
        (5) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is made under 
    this section shall hold the United States harmless from any 
    liability with respect to activities carried out, on or after the 
    date of the conveyance, on the real property conveyed. The United 
    States shall remain responsible for any liability with respect to 
    activities carried out, before such date, on the real property 
    conveyed.
SEC. 3183. EXTINGUISHMENT OF REVERSIONARY INTERESTS AND USE 
RESTRICTIONS.
    (a) Idaho.--
        (1) In general.--With respect to the property covered by each 
    deed in paragraph (2)--
            (A) the reversionary interests and use restrictions 
        relating to port and industrial use purposes are extinguished;
            (B) the restriction that no activity shall be permitted 
        that will compete with services and facilities offered by 
        public marinas is extinguished; and
            (C) the human habitation or other building structure use 
        restriction is extinguished if the elevation of the property is 
        above the standard project flood elevation.
        (2) Affected deeds.--The deeds with the following county 
    auditor's file numbers are referred to in paragraph (1):
            (A) Auditor's Instrument No. 399218 of Nez Perce County, 
        Idaho--2.07 acres.
            (B) Auditor's Instrument No. 487437 of Nez Perce County, 
        Idaho--7.32 acres.
    (b) Lake Texoma, Oklahoma.--
        (1) Release.--Any reversionary interest relating to public 
    parks and recreation on the land conveyed by the Secretary to the 
    State of Oklahoma at Lake Texoma pursuant to the Act entitled ``An 
    Act to authorize the sale of certain lands to the State of 
    Oklahoma'' (67 Stat. 63), shall terminate on the date of enactment 
    of this Act.
        (2) Instrument of release.--As soon as practicable after the 
    date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall execute and file 
    in the appropriate office a deed of release, an amended deed, or 
    any other appropriate instrument to release each reversionary 
    interest to which paragraph (1) applies.
        (3) Preservation of reserved rights.--A release of a 
    reversionary interest under this subsection shall not affect any 
    other right of the United States in any deed of conveyance pursuant 
    to the Act referred to in paragraph (1).
    (c) Lowell, Oregon.--
        (1) Release and extinguishment of deed reservations.--
            (A) Release and extinguishment of deed reservations.--The 
        Secretary may release and extinguish the deed reservations for 
        access and communication cables contained in the quitclaim 
        deed, dated January 26, 1965, and recorded February 15, 1965, 
        in the records of Lane County, Oregon; except that such 
        reservations may only be released and extinguished for the 
        lands owned by the city of Lowell as described in the quitclaim 
        deed, dated April 11, 1991, in such records.
            (B) Additional release and extinguishment of deed 
        reservations.--The Secretary may also release and extinguish 
        the same deed reservations referred to in subparagraph (A) over 
        land owned by Lane County, Oregon, within the city limits of 
        Lowell, Oregon, to accommodate the development proposals of the 
        city of Lowell/St. Vincent de Paul, Lane County, affordable 
        housing project; except that the Secretary may require, at no 
        cost to the United States--
                (i) the alteration or relocation of any existing 
            facilities, utilities, roads, or similar improvements on 
            such lands; and
                (ii) the right-of-way for such facilities, utilities, 
            roads, or improvements as a precondition of any release or 
            extinguishment of the deed reservations.
        (2) Conveyance.--The Secretary may convey to the city of 
    Lowell, Oregon, the parcel of land situated in the city of Lowell, 
    Oregon, at fair market value consisting of the strip of federally 
    owned lands located northeast of West Boundary Road between Hyland 
    Lane and the city of Lowell's eastward city limits.
        (3) Administrative cost.--Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and 
    (2), the city of Lowell, Oregon, shall pay the administrative costs 
    incurred by the United States to execute the release and 
    extinguishment of the deed reservations under paragraph (1) and the 
    conveyance under paragraph (2).
    (d) Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Cumberland River, Tennessee.--
        (1) Release of retained rights, interests, reservations.--With 
    respect to land conveyed by the Secretary to the Tennessee Society 
    of Crippled Children and Adults, Incorporated (commonly known as 
    ``Easter Seals Tennessee'') at Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Cumberland 
    River, Tennessee, under section 211 of the Flood Control Act of 
    1965 (79 Stat. 1087), the reversionary interests and the use 
    restrictions relating to recreation and camping purposes are 
    extinguished.
        (2) Instrument of release.--As soon as practicable after the 
    date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall execute and file 
    in the appropriate office a deed of release, amended deed, or other 
    appropriate instrument effectuating the release of interests 
    required by paragraph (1).
    (e) Lower Granite Pool, Washington.--
        (1) Extinguishment of reversionary interests and use 
    restrictions.--With respect to property covered by each deed 
    described in paragraph (2)--
            (A) the reversionary interests and use restrictions 
        relating to port or industrial purposes are extinguished; and
            (B) the human habitation or other building structure use 
        restriction is extinguished in each area in which the elevation 
        is above the standard project flood elevation.
        (2) Deeds.--The deeds referred to in paragraph (1) are as 
    follows:
            (A) Auditor's File Numbers 432576, 443411, 499988, and 
        579771 of Whitman County, Washington.
            (B) Auditor's File Numbers 125806, 138801, 147888, 154511, 
        156928, and 176360 of Asotin County, Washington.
    (f) Port of Pasco, Washington.--
        (1) Extinguishment of use restrictions and flowage easement.--
    With respect to the property covered by the deed in paragraph 
    (3)(A)--
            (A) the flowage easement and human habitation or other 
        building structure use restriction is extinguished if the 
        elevation of the property is above the standard project flood 
        elevation; and
            (B) the use of fill material to raise areas of the property 
        above the standard project flood elevation is authorized, 
        except in any area for which a permit under section 404 of the 
        Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) is 
        required.
        (2) Extinguishment of flowage easement.--With respect to the 
    property covered by each deed in paragraph (3)(B), the flowage 
    easement is extinguished if the elevation of the property is above 
    the standard project flood elevation.
        (3) Affected deeds.--The deeds referred to in paragraphs (1) 
    and (2) are as follows:
            (A) Auditor's File Number 262980 of Franklin County, 
        Washington.
            (B) Auditor's File Numbers 263334 and 404398 of Franklin 
        County, Washington.
    (g) No Effect on Other Rights.--Nothing in this section affects the 
remaining rights and interests of the Corps of Engineers for authorized 
project purposes.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

SEC. 4001. JOHN GLENN GREAT LAKES BASIN PROGRAM.
    Section 455 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-21) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) In-Kind Contributions for Study.--The non-Federal interest 
may provide up to 100 percent of the non-Federal share required under 
subsection (f) in the form of in-kind services and materials.''.
SEC. 4002. LAKE ERIE DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the nature and 
frequency of avian botulism problems in the vicinity of Lake Erie 
associated with dredged material disposal sites and shall make 
recommendations to eliminate the conditions that result in such 
problems.
SEC. 4003. SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES DROUGHT STUDY.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary 
of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of 
Commerce, and other appropriate agencies, shall conduct, at Federal 
expense, a comprehensive study of drought conditions in the 
southwestern United States, with particular emphasis on the Colorado 
River basin, the Rio Grande River basin, and the Great Basin.
    (b) Inventory of Actions.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
shall assemble an inventory of actions taken or planned to be taken to 
address drought-related situations in the southwestern United States.
    (c) Purpose.--The purpose of the study shall be to develop 
recommendations to more effectively address current and future drought 
conditions in the southwestern United States.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $7,000,000. 
Such funds shall remain available until expended.
SEC. 4004. DELAWARE RIVER.
    The Secretary shall review, in consultation with the Delaware River 
Basin Commission and the States of Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, 
and New York, the report of the Chief of Engineers on the Delaware 
River, published as House Document Numbered 522, 87th Congress, Second 
Session, as it relates to the Mid-Delaware River Basin from Wilmington 
to Port Jervis, and any other pertinent reports (including the strategy 
for resolution of interstate flow management issues in the Delaware 
River Basin dated August 2004 and the National Park Service Lower 
Delaware River Management Plan (1997-1999)), with a view to determining 
whether any modifications of recommendations contained in the first 
report referred to are advisable at the present time, in the interest 
of flood damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, and other related 
problems.
SEC. 4005. EURASIAN MILFOIL.
    Under the authority of section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1958 (33 U.S.C. 610), the Secretary shall conduct a study, at Federal 
expense, to develop national protocols for the use of the Euhrychiopsis 
lecontei weevil for biological control of Eurasian milfoil in the lakes 
of Vermont and other northeastern States.
SEC. 4006. FIRE ISLAND, ALASKA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigational improvements, including a barge 
landing facility, Fire Island, Alaska.
SEC. 4007. KNIK ARM, COOK INLET, ALASKA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the potential 
impacts on navigation of construction of a bridge across Knik Arm, Cook 
Inlet, Alaska.
SEC. 4008. KUSKOKWIM RIVER, ALASKA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation, Kuskokwim River, Alaska, in the 
vicinity of the village of Crooked Creek.
SEC. 4009. NOME HARBOR, ALASKA.
    The Secretary shall review the project for navigation, Nome Harbor 
improvements, Alaska, authorized by section 101(a)(1) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 273), to determine whether 
the project cost increases, including the cost of rebuilding the 
entrance channel damaged in a September 2005 storm, resulted from a 
design deficiency.
SEC. 4010. ST. GEORGE HARBOR, ALASKA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
providing navigation improvements at St. George Harbor, Alaska.
SEC. 4011. SUSITNA RIVER, ALASKA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for hydropower, recreation, and related purposes 
on the Susitna River, Alaska.
SEC. 4012. VALDEZ, ALASKA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation, Valdez, Alaska, and if the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible, shall carry out the 
project at a total cost of $20,000,000.
SEC. 4013. GILA BEND, MARICOPA, ARIZONA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, 
Gila Bend, Maricopa, Arizona.
    (b) Review of Plans.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
review plans and designs developed by non-Federal interests and shall 
incorporate such plans and designs into the Federal study if the 
Secretary determines that such plans and designs are consistent with 
Federal standards.
SEC. 4014. SEARCY COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
using Greers Ferry Lake as a water supply source for Searcy County, 
Arkansas.
SEC. 4015. ALISO CREEK, CALIFORNIA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for streambank protection and environmental 
restoration along Aliso Creek, California.
SEC. 4016. FRESNO, KINGS, AND KERN COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Fresno, Kings, and Kern 
Counties, California.
SEC. 4017. FRUITVALE AVENUE RAILROAD BRIDGE, ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall prepare a comprehensive report 
that examines the condition of the existing Fruitvale Avenue Railroad 
Bridge, Alameda County, California (referred to in this section as the 
``Railroad Bridge''), and determines the most economic means to 
maintain that rail link by either repairing or replacing the Railroad 
Bridge.
    (b) Requirements.--The report under this section shall include--
        (1) a determination of whether the Railroad Bridge is in 
    immediate danger of failing or collapsing;
        (2) the annual costs to maintain the Railroad Bridge;
        (3) the costs to place the Railroad Bridge in a safe, ``no-
    collapse'' condition, such that the Railroad Bridge will not 
    endanger maritime traffic;
        (4) the costs to retrofit the Railroad Bridge such that the 
    Railroad Bridge may continue to serve as a rail link between the 
    Island of Alameda and the mainland; and
        (5) the costs to construct a replacement for the Railroad 
    Bridge capable of serving the current and future rail, light rail, 
    and homeland security needs of the region.
    (c) Submission of Report.--The Secretary shall--
        (1) complete the Railroad Bridge report under subsection (a) 
    not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act; 
    and
        (2) submit the report to the Committee on Environment and 
    Public Works of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and 
    Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
    (d) Limitations.--The Secretary shall not--
        (1) demolish the Railroad Bridge or otherwise render the 
    Railroad Bridge unavailable or unusable for rail traffic; or
        (2) reduce maintenance of the Railroad Bridge.
    (e) Easement.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall provide to the city of 
    Alameda, California, a nonexclusive access easement over the 
    Oakland Estuary that comprises the subsurface land and surface 
    approaches for the Railroad Bridge that--
            (A) is consistent with the Bay Trail Proposal of the city 
        of Oakland; and
            (B) is otherwise suitable for the improvement, operation, 
        and maintenance of the Railroad Bridge or construction, 
        operation, and maintenance of a suitable replacement bridge.
        (2) Cost.--The easement under paragraph (1) shall be provided 
    to the city of Alameda without consideration and at no cost to the 
    United States.
SEC. 4018. LOS ANGELES RIVER REVITALIZATION STUDY, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the city of 
Los Angeles, shall--
        (1) prepare a feasibility study for environmental ecosystem 
    restoration, flood control, recreation, and other aspects of Los 
    Angeles River revitalization that is consistent with the goals of 
    the Los Angeles River Revitalization Master Plan published by the 
    city of Los Angeles; and
        (2) consider any locally-preferred project alternatives 
    developed through a full and open evaluation process for inclusion 
    in the study.
    (b) Use of Existing Information and Measures.--In preparing the 
study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall use, to the maximum 
extent practicable--
        (1) information obtained from the Los Angeles River 
    Revitalization Master Plan; and
        (2) the development process of that plan.
    (c) Demonstration Projects.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to construct 
    demonstration projects in order to provide information to develop 
    the study under subsection (a)(1).
        (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of any 
    project under this subsection shall be not more than 65 percent.
        (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
    appropriated to carry out this subsection $25,000,000.
SEC. 4019. LYTLE CREEK, RIALTO, CALIFORNIA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and groundwater 
recharge, Lytle Creek, Rialto, California.
SEC. 4020. MOKELUMNE RIVER, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply along the 
Mokelumne River, San Joaquin County, California.
    (b) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to invalidate, preempt, or create any exception to 
State water law, State water rights, or Federal or State permitted 
activities or agreements.
SEC. 4021. ORICK, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction 
and ecosystem restoration, Orick, California.
    (b) Feasibility of Restoring or Rehabilitating Redwook Creek 
Levees.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall determine the 
feasibility of restoring or rehabilitating the Redwood Creek Levees, 
Humboldt County, California.
SEC. 4022. SHORELINE STUDY, OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA.
    Section 414 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2636) is amended by striking ``32 months'' and inserting ``44 
months''.
SEC. 4023. RIALTO, FONTANA, AND COLTON, CALIFORNIA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Rialto, Fontana, and 
Colton, California.
SEC. 4024. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIFORNIA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study to determine the 
feasibility of, and alternatives for, measures to protect water 
diversion facilities and fish protective screen facilities in the 
vicinity of river mile 178 on the Sacramento River, California.
SEC. 4025. SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, San Diego County, California, 
including a review of the feasibility of connecting 4 existing 
reservoirs to increase usable storage capacity.
SEC. 4026. SAN FRANCISCO BAY, SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of the beneficial use of dredged material from the San 
Francisco Bay in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, 
including the benefits and impacts of salinity in the Delta and the 
benefits to navigation, flood damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, 
water quality, salinity control, water supply reliability, and 
recreation.
    (b) Cooperation.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
cooperate with the California department of water resources and 
appropriate Federal and State entities in developing options for the 
beneficial use of dredged material from San Francisco Bay for the 
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta area.
    (c) Review.--The study shall include a review of the feasibility of 
using Sherman Island as a rehandling site for levee maintenance 
material, as well as for ecosystem restoration. The review may include 
carrying out and monitoring a pilot project using up to 150,000 cubic 
yards of dredged material and being carried out at the Sherman Island 
site, examining larger scale use of dredged materials from the San 
Francisco Bay and Suisun Bay Channel, and analyzing the feasibility of 
the potential use of saline materials from the San Francisco Bay for 
both rehandling and ecosystem restoration purposes.
SEC. 4027. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY SHORELINE, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with non-Federal 
interests, shall conduct a study of the feasibility of carrying out a 
project for--
        (1) flood damage reduction along the South San Francisco Bay 
    shoreline, California;
        (2) restoration of the South San Francisco Bay salt ponds 
    (including on land owned by other Federal agencies); and
        (3) other related purposes, as the Secretary determines to be 
    appropriate.
    (b) Report.--
        (1) In general.--Not later than 3 years after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
    report describing the results of the study under subsection (a).
        (2) Inclusions.--The report under paragraph (1) shall include 
    recommendations of the Secretary with respect to the project 
    described in subsection (a) based on planning, design, and land 
    acquisition documents prepared by--
            (A) the California State Coastal Conservancy;
            (B) the Santa Clara Valley Water District; and
            (C) other local interests.
    (c) Credit.--
        (1) In general.--In accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
    Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), and subject to paragraph 
    (2), the Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
    cost of any project authorized by law as a result of the South San 
    Francisco Bay shoreline study--
            (A) the cost of work performed by the non-Federal interest 
        in preparation of the feasibility study that is conducted 
        before the date of the feasibility cost sharing agreement; and
            (B) the funds expended by the non-Federal interest for 
        acquisition costs of land that constitutes a part of such a 
        project and that is owned by the United States Fish and 
        Wildlife Service.
        (2) Conditions.--The Secretary may provide credit under 
    paragraph (1) if--
            (A) the value of all or any portion of land referred to in 
        paragraph (1)(B) that would be subject to the credit has not 
        previously been credited to the non-Federal interest for a 
        project; and
            (B) the land was not acquired to meet any mitigation 
        requirement of the non-Federal interest.
SEC. 4028. TWENTYNINE PALMS, CALIFORNIA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction in the vicinity of 
Twentynine Palms, California.
SEC. 4029. YUCCA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Burnt Mountain 
basin, in the vicinity of Yucca Valley, California.
SEC. 4030. SELENIUM STUDIES, COLORADO.
    (a) In General.--The Director of the United States Geological 
Survey, in consultation with State water quality and resource and 
conservation agencies, shall conduct regional and watershed-wide 
studies to address selenium concentrations in the State of Colorado, 
including studies--
        (1) to measure selenium on specific sites; and
        (2) to determine whether specific selenium measures studied 
    should be recommended for use in demonstration projects.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.
SEC. 4031. DELAWARE AND CHRISTINA RIVERS AND SHELLPOT CREEK, 
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and related purposes 
along the Delaware and Christina Rivers and Shellpot Creek, Wilmington, 
Delaware.
SEC. 4032. DELAWARE INLAND BAYS AND TRIBUTARIES AND ATLANTIC COAST, 
DELAWARE.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of modifying the project for navigation, Indian River 
Inlet and Bay, Delaware.
    (b) Factors for Consideration and Priority.--In carrying out the 
study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
        (1) take into consideration all necessary activities to 
    stabilize the scour holes threatening the Inlet and Bay shorelines; 
    and
        (2) give priority to stabilizing and restoring the Inlet 
    channel and scour holes adjacent to the United States Coast Guard 
    pier and helipad and the adjacent State-owned properties.
SEC. 4033. COLLIER COUNTY BEACHES, FLORIDA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for hurricane and storm damage reduction and 
flood damage reduction in the vicinity of Vanderbilt, Park Shore, and 
Naples beaches, Collier County, Florida.
SEC. 4034. LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, including 
improved water quality, and related purposes, Lower St. Johns River, 
Florida.
SEC. 4035. HERBERT HOOVER DIKE SUPPLEMENTAL MAJOR REHABILITATION 
REPORT, FLORIDA.
    (a) In General.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall publish a supplemental 
report to the major rehabilitation report for the Herbert Hoover Dike 
system approved by the Chief of Engineers in November 2000.
    (b) Inclusions.--The supplemental report under subsection (a) shall 
include--
        (1) an evaluation of existing conditions at the Herbert Hoover 
    Dike system;
        (2) an identification of additional risks associated with flood 
    events at the system that are equal to or greater than the standard 
    projected flood risks;
        (3) an evaluation of the potential to integrate projects of the 
    Corps of Engineers into an enhanced flood protection system for 
    Lake Okeechobee, including--
            (A) the potential for additional water storage north of 
        Lake Okeechobee; and
            (B) an analysis of other project features included in the 
        Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan; and
        (4) a review of the report prepared for the South Florida Water 
    Management District dated April 2006.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,500,000.
SEC. 4036. VANDERBILT BEACH LAGOON, FLORIDA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, water supply, and 
improvement of water quality at Vanderbilt Beach Lagoon, Florida.
SEC. 4037. MERIWETHER COUNTY, GEORGIA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Meriwether County, Georgia.
SEC. 4038. BOISE RIVER, IDAHO.
    The study for flood control, Boise River, Idaho, authorized by 
section 414 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
324), is modified--
        (1) to add ecosystem restoration and water supply as project 
    purposes to be studied; and
        (2) to require the Secretary to credit toward the non-Federal 
    share of the cost of the study the cost, not to exceed $500,000, of 
    work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
    partnership agreement for the project if the Secretary determines 
    that the work is integral to the project.
SEC. 4039. BALLARD'S ISLAND SIDE CHANNEL, ILLINOIS.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for ecosystem restoration, Ballard's Island side 
channel, Illinois.
SEC. 4040. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.
    Section 425(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2638) is amended by inserting ``Lake Michigan and'' before ``the 
Chicago River''.
SEC. 4041. SALEM, INDIANA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project to provide an additional water supply source for 
Salem, Indiana.
SEC. 4042. BUCKHORN LAKE, KENTUCKY.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of modifying the project for flood damage reduction, 
Buckhorn Lake, Kentucky, authorized by section 2 of the Flood Control 
Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), to add ecosystem restoration and 
recreation as project purposes.
    (b) In-Kind Contributions.--The non-Federal interest may provide 
the non-Federal share of the cost of the study in the form of in-kind 
services and materials.
SEC. 4043. DEWEY LAKE, KENTUCKY.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
modifying the project for Dewey Lake, Kentucky, to add water supply as 
a project purpose.
SEC. 4044. LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for flood 
control, Louisville, Kentucky, authorized by section 4 of the Flood 
Control Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), to investigate measures 
to address the rehabilitation of the project.
SEC. 4045. VIDALIA PORT, LOUISIANA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation improvement at Vidalia, 
Louisiana.
SEC. 4046. FALL RIVER HARBOR, MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
deepening that portion of the navigation channel of the navigation 
project for Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 
731), seaward of the Charles M. Braga, Jr. Memorial Bridge, Fall River 
and Somerset, Massachusetts.
SEC. 4047. CLINTON RIVER, MICHIGAN.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, Clinton River, 
Michigan.
SEC. 4048. HAMBURG AND GREEN OAK TOWNSHIPS, MICHIGAN.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction on Ore Lake and the 
Huron River for Hamburg and Green Oak Townships, Michigan.
SEC. 4049. LAKE ERIE AT LUNA PIER, MICHIGAN.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for storm damage reduction and other related 
purposes along Lake Erie at Luna Pier, Michigan.
SEC. 4050. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study and prepare a 
report to evaluate the integrity of the bulkhead system located on and 
in the vicinity of Duluth-Superior Harbor, Duluth, Minnesota, and 
Superior, Wisconsin.
    (b) Contents.--The report shall include--
        (1) a determination of causes of corrosion of the bulkhead 
    system;
        (2) recommendations to reduce corrosion of the bulkhead system;
        (3) a description of the necessary repairs to the bulkhead 
    system; and
        (4) an estimate of the cost of addressing the causes of the 
    corrosion and carrying out necessary repairs.
SEC. 4051. NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
modifying the project for navigation, Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, 
Alabama and Mississippi, to provide water supply for northeast 
Mississippi.
SEC. 4052. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL, NEW JERSEY.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project in the vicinity of the Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway, New Jersey, for the construction of a dredged material 
disposal transfer facility to make dredged material available for 
beneficial reuse.
SEC. 4053. BAYONNE, NEW JERSEY.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, including 
improved water quality, enhanced public access, and recreation, on the 
Kill Van Kull, Bayonne, New Jersey.
SEC. 4054. CARTERET, NEW JERSEY.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, including 
improved water quality, enhanced public access, and recreation, on the 
Raritan River, Carteret, New Jersey.
SEC. 4055. GLOUCESTER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Gloucester County, 
New Jersey, including the feasibility of restoring the flood protection 
dikes in Gibbstown, New Jersey, and the associated tidegates in 
Gloucester County, New Jersey.
SEC. 4056. PERTH AMBOY, NEW JERSEY.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration and recreation on 
the Arthur Kill, Perth Amboy, New Jersey.
SEC. 4057. BATAVIA, NEW YORK.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for hydropower and related purposes in the 
vicinity of Batavia, New York.
SEC. 4058. BIG SISTER CREEK, EVANS, NEW YORK.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, 
Big Sister Creek, Evans, New York.
    (b) Evaluation of Potential Solutions.--In conducting the study, 
the Secretary shall evaluate potential solutions to flooding from all 
sources, including flooding that results from ice jams.
SEC. 4059. FINGER LAKES, NEW YORK.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
protection, Finger Lakes, New York, to address water quality and 
aquatic nuisance species.
SEC. 4060. LAKE ERIE SHORELINE, BUFFALO, NEW YORK.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for storm damage reduction and shoreline 
protection in the vicinity of Gallagher Beach, Lake Erie Shoreline, 
Buffalo, New York.
SEC. 4061. NEWTOWN CREEK, NEW YORK.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out ecosystem restoration improvements on Newtown Creek, 
Brooklyn and Queens, New York.
SEC. 4062. NIAGARA RIVER, NEW YORK.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for a low-head hydroelectric generating facility 
in the Niagara River, New York.
SEC. 4063. SHORE PARKWAY GREENWAY, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of carrying 
out a project for shoreline protection in the vicinity of the 
confluence of the Narrows and Gravesend Bay, Upper New York Bay, Shore 
Parkway Greenway, Brooklyn, New York.
SEC. 4064. UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, NEW YORK.
    In accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a nonprofit organization may serve, with the consent 
of the affected local government, as the non-Federal interest for a 
study for the Upper Delaware River watershed, New York, being carried 
out under Committee Resolution 2495 of the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, adopted May 9, 
1996.
SEC. 4065. LINCOLN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study of existing water and water 
quality-related infrastructure in Lincoln County, North Carolina, to 
assist local interests in determining the most efficient and effective 
way to connect county infrastructure.
SEC. 4066. WILKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Wilkes County, North Carolina.
SEC. 4067. YADKINVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Yadkinville, North Carolina.
SEC. 4068. FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION, OHIO.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction in Cuyahoga, Lake, 
Ashtabula, Geauga, Erie, Lucas, Sandusky, Huron, and Stark Counties, 
Ohio.
SEC. 4069. LAKE ERIE, OHIO.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for power generation at confined disposal 
facilities along Lake Erie, Ohio.
SEC. 4070. OHIO RIVER, OHIO.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction on the Ohio River in 
Mahoning, Columbiana, Jefferson, Belmont, Noble, Monroe, Washington, 
Athens, Meigs, Gallia, Lawrence, and Scioto Counties, Ohio.
SEC. 4071. TOLEDO HARBOR DREDGED MATERIAL PLACEMENT, TOLEDO, OHIO.
    The Secretary shall study the feasibility of removing previously 
dredged and placed materials from the Toledo Harbor confined disposal 
facility, transporting the materials, and disposing of the materials in 
or at abandoned mine sites in southeastern Ohio.
SEC. 4072. TOLEDO HARBOR, MAUMEE RIVER, AND LAKE CHANNEL PROJECT, 
TOLEDO, OHIO.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of constructing a project for navigation, Toledo, Ohio.
    (b) Factors for Consideration.--In conducting the study under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall take into consideration--
        (1) realigning the existing Toledo Harbor channel widening 
    occurring where the River Channel meets the Lake Channel from the 
    northwest to the southeast side of the River Channel;
        (2) realigning the entire 200-foot wide channel located at the 
    upper river terminus of the River Channel southern river embankment 
    towards the northern river embankment; and
        (3) adjusting the existing turning basin to accommodate those 
    changes.
SEC. 4073. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AND FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENTS, OREGON.
    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking ecosystem restoration and fish passage 
improvements on rivers throughout the State of Oregon.
    (b) Requirements.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall--
        (1) work in coordination with the State of Oregon, local 
    governments, and other Federal agencies; and
        (2) place emphasis on--
            (A) fish passage and conservation and restoration 
        strategies to benefit species that are listed or proposed for 
        listing as threatened or endangered species under the 
        Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
            (B) other watershed restoration objectives.
    (c) Pilot Program.--
        (1) In general.--In conjunction with conducting the study under 
    subsection (a), the Secretary may carry out pilot projects to 
    demonstrate the effectiveness of ecosystem restoration and fish 
    passages.
        (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
    appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this subsection.
SEC. 4074. WALLA WALLA RIVER BASIN, OREGON.
    In conducting the study of determine the feasibility of carrying 
out a project for ecosystem restoration, Walla Walla River basin, 
Oregon, the Secretary shall--
        (1) credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
    study the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
    before the date of the partnership agreement for the project if the 
    Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project; and
        (2) allow the non-Federal interest to provide the non-Federal 
    share of the cost of the study in the form of in-kind services and 
    materials.
SEC. 4075. CHARTIERS CREEK WATERSHED, PENNSYLVANIA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Chartiers Creek 
watershed, Pennsylvania.
SEC. 4076. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PENNSYLVANIA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for flood 
control, Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Warren, Pennsylvania, 
authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (49 
Stat. 1570), and modified by section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 
28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1215), section 2 of the Flood Control Act of August 
18, 1941 (55 Stat. 646), and section 4 of the Flood Control Act of 
December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887), to review operations of and identify 
modifications to the project to expand recreational opportunities.
SEC. 4077. WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of structural 
and nonstructural flood damage reduction, stream bank protection, storm 
water management, channel clearing and modification, and watershed 
coordination measures in the Mahoning River basin, Pennsylvania, the 
Allegheny River basin, Pennsylvania, and the Upper Ohio River basin, 
Pennsylvania, to provide a level of flood protection sufficient to 
prevent future losses to communities located in such basins from 
flooding such as occurred in September 2004, but not less than a 100-
year level of flood protection.
    (b) Priority Communities.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall give priority to the following Pennsylvania 
communities: Marshall Township, Ross Township, Shaler Township, Jackson 
Township, Harmony, Zelienople, Darlington Township, Houston Borough, 
Chartiers Township, Washington, Canton Township, Tarentum Borough, and 
East Deer Township.
SEC. 4078. WILLIAMSPORT, PENNSYLVANIA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the project for flood 
control, Williamsport, Pennsylvania, authorized by section 5 of the 
Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570), to investigate 
measures to rehabilitate the project.
SEC. 4079. YARDLEY BOROUGH, PENNSYLVANIA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, at Yardley Borough, 
Pennsylvania, including the alternative of raising River Road.
SEC. 4080. RIO VALENCIANO, JUNCOS, PUERTO RICO.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to reevaluate 
the project for flood damage reduction and water supply, Rio 
Valenciano, Juncos, Puerto Rico, authorized by section 209 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1197) and section 204 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1828), to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out the project.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the study the cost of work carried out by the non-
Federal interest before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
project.
SEC. 4081. WOONSOCKET LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, 
RHODE ISLAND.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study, and, not later than June 30, 
2008, submit to Congress a report that describes the results of the 
study, on the flood damage reduction project, Woonsocket, Blackstone 
River basin, Rhode Island, authorized by section 10 of the Flood 
Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 892), to determine the 
measures necessary to restore the level of protection of the project as 
originally designed and constructed.
SEC. 4082. CROOKED CREEK, BENNETTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, 
South Carolina.
SEC. 4083. BROAD RIVER, YORK COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Broad River, York County, 
South Carolina.
SEC. 4084. SAVANNAH RIVER, SOUTH CAROLINA AND GEORGIA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects--
        (1) to improve the Savannah River for navigation and related 
    purposes that may be necessary to support the location of container 
    cargo and other port facilities to be located in Jasper County, 
    South Carolina, in the vicinity of Mile 6 of the Savannah Harbor 
    entrance channel; and
        (2) to remove from the proposed Jasper County port site the 
    easements used by the Corps of Engineers for placement of dredged 
    fill materials for the Savannah Harbor Federal navigation project.
    (b) Factors for Consideration.--In making a determination under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall take into consideration--
        (1) landside infrastructure;
        (2) the provision of any additional dredged material disposal 
    area as a consequence of removing from the proposed Jasper County 
    port site the easements used by the Corps of Engineers for 
    placement of dredged fill materials for the Savannah Harbor Federal 
    navigation project; and
        (3) the results of the proposed bistate compact between the 
    State of Georgia and the State of South Carolina to own, develop, 
    and operate port facilities at the proposed Jasper County port 
    site, as described in the term sheet executed by the Governor of 
    the State of Georgia and the Governor of the State of South 
    Carolina on March 12, 2007.
SEC. 4085. CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Chattanooga Creek, 
Dobbs Branch, Chattanooga, Tennessee.
SEC. 4086. CLEVELAND, TENNESSEE.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Cleveland, 
Tennessee.
SEC. 4087. CUMBERLAND RIVER, NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for recreation on, riverbank protection for, and 
environmental protection of, the Cumberland River and riparian habitats 
in the city of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee.
SEC. 4088. LEWIS, LAWRENCE, AND WAYNE COUNTIES, TENNESSEE.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne 
Counties, Tennessee.
SEC. 4089. WOLF RIVER AND NONCONNAH CREEK, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction along Wolf River and 
Nonconnah Creek, in the vicinity of Memphis, Tennessee, to include the 
repair, replacement, rehabilitation, and restoration of the following 
pumping stations: Cypress Creek, Nonconnah Creek, Ensley, Marble Bayou, 
and Bayou Gayoso.
SEC. 4090. ABILENE, TEXAS.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Abilene, Texas.
SEC. 4091. COASTAL TEXAS ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION AND RESTORATION, TEXAS.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall develop a comprehensive plan 
to determine the feasibility of carrying out projects for flood damage 
reduction, hurricane and storm damage reduction, and ecosystem 
restoration in the coastal areas of the State of Texas.
    (b) Scope.--The comprehensive plan shall provide for the 
protection, conservation, and restoration of wetlands, barrier islands, 
shorelines, and related lands and features that protect critical 
resources, habitat, and infrastructure from the impacts of coastal 
storms, hurricanes, erosion, and subsidence.
    (c) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term ``coastal 
areas in the State of Texas'' means the coastal areas of the State of 
Texas from the Sabine River on the east to the Rio Grande River on the 
west and includes tidal waters, barrier islands, marshes, coastal 
wetlands, rivers and streams, and adjacent areas.
SEC. 4092. PORT OF GALVESTON, TEXAS.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of carrying 
out a project for dredged material disposal in the vicinity of the 
project for navigation and environmental restoration, Houston-Galveston 
Navigation Channels, Texas, authorized by section 101(a)(30) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3666).
SEC. 4093. GRAND COUNTY AND MOAB, UTAH.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply for Grand County and the city 
of Moab, Utah, including a review of the impact of current and future 
demands on the Spanish Valley Aquifer.
SEC. 4094. SOUTHWESTERN UTAH.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction, Santa Clara River, 
Washington, Iron, and Kane Counties, Utah.
SEC. 4095. ECOSYSTEM AND HYDROPOWER GENERATION DAMS, VERMONT.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
potential to carry out ecosystem restoration and hydropower generation 
at dams in the State of Vermont, including a review of the report of 
the Secretary on the land and water resources of the New England-New 
York region submitted to the President on April 27, 1956 (published as 
Senate Document Number 14, 85th Congress), and other relevant reports.
    (b) Purpose.--The purpose of the study under subsection (a) shall 
be to determine the feasibility of providing water resource 
improvements and small-scale hydropower generation in the State of 
Vermont, including, as appropriate, options for dam restoration, 
hydropower, dam removal, and fish passage enhancement.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to carry 
out this section $500,000. Such sums shall remain available until 
expended.
SEC. 4096. ELLIOTT BAY SEAWALL, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON.
    (a) In General.--The study for rehabilitation of the Elliott Bay 
Seawall, Seattle, Washington, being carried out under Committee 
Resolution 2704 of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
of the House of Representatives adopted September 25, 2002, is modified 
to include a determination of the feasibility of reducing future damage 
to the seawall from seismic activity.
    (b) Acceptance of Contributions.--In carrying out the study, the 
Secretary may accept contributions in excess of the non-Federal share 
of the cost of the study from the non-Federal interest to the extent 
that the Secretary determines that the contributions will facilitate 
completion of the study.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of any project authorized by law as a result of the 
study the value of contributions accepted by the Secretary under 
subsection (b).
SEC. 4097. MONONGAHELA RIVER BASIN, NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out aquatic ecosystem restoration and protection projects in 
the watersheds of the Monongahela River Basin lying within the counties 
of Hancock, Ohio, Marshall, Wetzel, Tyler, Pleasants, Wood, Doddridge, 
Monongalia, Marion, Harrison, Taylor, Barbour, Preston, Tucker, 
Mineral, Grant, Gilmer, Brooke, and Rithchie, West Virginia.
SEC. 4098. KENOSHA HARBOR, WISCONSIN.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation, Kenosha Harbor, Wisconsin, 
including the extension of existing piers.
SEC. 4099. JOHNSONVILLE DAM, JOHNSONVILLE, WISCONSIN.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the Johnsonville Dam, 
Johnsonville, Wisconsin, to determine if the structure prevents ice 
jams on the Sheboygan River.
SEC. 4100. WAUWATOSA, WISCONSIN.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction and environmental 
restoration, Menomonee River and Underwood Creek, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 
and greater Milwaukee watersheds, Wisconsin.
SEC. 4101. DEBRIS REMOVAL.
    (a) Evaluation.--
        (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United 
    States, in coordination with the Secretary and the Administrator of 
    the Environmental Protection Agency, and in consultation with 
    affected communities, shall conduct a complete evaluation of 
    Federal and non-Federal demolition, debris removal, segregation, 
    transportation, and disposal practices relating to disaster areas 
    designated in response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (including 
    regulated and nonregulated materials and debris).
        (2) Inclusions.--The evaluation under paragraph (1) shall 
    include a review of--
            (A) compliance with all applicable environmental laws;
            (B) permits issued or required to be issued with respect to 
        debris handling, transportation, storage, or disposal; and
            (C) administrative actions relating to debris removal and 
        disposal in the disaster areas described in paragraph (1).
    (b) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Comptroller General, in consultation with the Secretary 
and the Administrator, shall submit to the Committee on the Environment 
and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report that--
        (1) describes the findings of the Comptroller General with 
    respect to the evaluation under subsection (a);
        (2)(A) certifies compliance with all applicable environmental 
    laws; and
        (B) identifies any area in which a violation of such a law has 
    occurred or is occurring;
        (3) includes recommendations to ensure--
            (A) the protection of the environment;
            (B) sustainable practices; and
            (C) the integrity of hurricane and flood protection 
        infrastructure relating to debris disposal practices;
        (4) contains an enforcement plan that is designed to prevent 
    illegal dumping of hurricane debris in a disaster area; and
        (5) contains plans of the Secretary and the Administrator to 
    involve the public and non-Federal interests, including through the 
    formation of a Federal advisory committee, as necessary, to seek 
    public comment relating to the removal, disposal, and planning for 
    the handling of post-hurricane debris.
    (c) Restriction.--
        (1) In general.--No Federal funds may be used to pay for or 
    reimburse any State or local entity in Louisiana for the disposal 
    of construction and demolition debris generated as a result of 
    Hurricane Katrina in 2005 in a landfill designated for construction 
    and demolition debris as described in section 257.2 of title 40, 
    Code of Federal Regulations, unless that waste meets the definition 
    of construction and demolition debris, as specified under Federal 
    law and described in that section on the date of enactment of this 
    Act.
        (2) Applicability.--The restriction in paragraph (1) shall 
    apply only to any disposal that occurs after the date of enactment 
    of this Act.

                         TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS

SEC. 5001. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.
    (a) In General.--Upon request of a non-Federal interest, the 
Secretary shall be responsible for maintenance of the following 
navigation channels and breakwaters constructed or improved by the non-
Federal interest if the Secretary determines that such maintenance is 
economically justified and environmentally acceptable and that the 
channel or breakwater was constructed in accordance with applicable 
permits and appropriate engineering and design standards:
        (1) Manatee Harbor basin, Florida.
        (2) Tampa Harbor, Sparkman Channel and Davis Island, Florida.
        (3) West turning basin, Canaveral Harbor, Florida.
        (4) Bayou LaFourche Channel, Port Fourchon, Louisiana.
        (5) Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, Louisiana.
        (6) Pidgeon Industrial Harbor, Pidgeon Industrial Park, Memphis 
    Harbor, Tennessee.
        (7) Houston Ship Channel, Bayport Cruise Channel and Bayport 
    Cruise turning basin, as part of the existing Bayport Channel, 
    Texas.
        (8) Pix Bayou Navigation Channel, Chambers County, Texas.
        (9) Jacintoport Channel at Houston Ship Channel, Texas.
        (10) Racine Harbor, Wisconsin.
    (b) Completion of Assessment.--Not later than 6 months after the 
date of receipt of a request from a non-Federal interest for Federal 
assumption of maintenance of a channel listed in subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall make a determination as provided in subsection (a) and 
advise the non-Federal interest of the Secretary's determination.
SEC. 5002. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical, planning, and 
design assistance to non-Federal interests for carrying out watershed 
management, restoration, and development projects at the locations 
described in subsection (d).
    (b) Specific Measures.--Assistance provided under subsection (a) 
may be in support of non-Federal projects for the following purposes:
        (1) Management and restoration of water quality.
        (2) Control and remediation of toxic sediments.
        (3) Restoration of degraded streams, rivers, wetlands, and 
    other water bodies to their natural condition as a means to control 
    flooding, excessive erosion, and sedimentation.
        (4) Protection and restoration of watersheds, including urban 
    watersheds.
        (5) Demonstration of technologies for nonstructural measures to 
    reduce destructive impacts of flooding.
    (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
assistance provided under subsection (a) shall be 25 percent.
    (d) Project Locations.--The locations referred to in subsection (a) 
are the following:
        (1) Charlotte Harbor watershed, Florida.
        (2) Those portions of the watersheds of the Chattahoochee, 
    Etowah, Flint, Ocmulgee, and Oconee Rivers lying within the 
    counties of Bartow, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, 
    Douglas, Fayette, Fulton, Forsyth, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, Paulding, 
    Rockdale, and Walton, Georgia.
        (3) Kinkaid Lake, Jackson County, Illinois.
        (4) Amite River basin, Louisiana.
        (5) East Atchafalaya River basin, Iberville Parish and Pointe 
    Coupee Parish, Louisiana.
        (6) Red River watershed, Louisiana.
        (7) Taunton River basin, Massachusetts.
        (8) Marlboro Township, New Jersey.
        (9) Esopus, Plattekill, and Rondout Creeks, Greene, Sullivan, 
    and Ulster Counties, New York.
        (10) Greenwood Lake watershed, New York and New Jersey.
        (11) Long Island Sound watershed, New York.
        (12) Ramapo River watershed, New York.
        (13) Tuscarawas River basin, Ohio.
        (14) Western Lake Erie basin, Ohio.
        (15) Those portions of the watersheds of the Beaver, Upper 
    Ohio, Connoquenessing, Lower Allegheny, Kiskiminetas, Lower 
    Monongahela, Youghiogheny, Shenango, and Mahoning Rivers lying 
    within the counties of Beaver, Butler, Lawrence, and Mercer, 
    Pennsylvania.
        (16) Otter Creek watershed, Pennsylvania.
        (17) Unami Creek watershed, Milford Township, Pennsylvania.
        (18) Sauk River basin, Washington.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000.
SEC. 5003. DAM SAFETY.
    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide assistance to enhance 
dam safety at the following locations:
        (1) Fish Creek Dam, Blaine County, Idaho.
        (2) Keith Creek, Rockford, Illinois.
        (3) Mount Zion Mill Pond Dam, Fulton County, Indiana.
        (4) Hamilton Dam, Flint River, Flint, Michigan.
        (5) Congers Lake Dam, Rockland County, New York.
        (6) Lake Lucille Dam, New City, New York.
        (7) Peconic River Dams, town of Riverhead, Suffolk, Long 
    Island, New York.
        (8) Pine Grove Lakes Dam, Sloatsburg, New York.
        (9) State Dam, Auburn, New York.
        (10) Whaley Lake Dam, Pawling, New York.
        (11) Brightwood Dam, Concord Township, Ohio.
        (12) Ingham Spring Dam, Solebury Township, Pennsylvania.
        (13) Leaser Lake Dam, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
        (14) Stillwater Dam, Monroe County, Pennsylvania.
        (15) Wissahickon Creek Dam, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.
    (b) Special Rule.--The assistance provided under subsection (a) for 
State Dam, Auburn, New York, shall be for a project for rehabilitation 
in accordance with the report on State Dam Rehabilitation, Owasco Lake 
Outlet, New York, dated March 1999, if the Secretary determines that 
the project is feasible.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out subsection (a) $12,000,000.
SEC. 5004. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY EVALUATIONS.
    (a) In General.--Upon request of a non-Federal interest, the 
Secretary shall evaluate the structural integrity and effectiveness of 
a project for flood damage reduction and, if the Secretary determines 
that the project does not meet such minimum standards as the Secretary 
may establish and absent action by the Secretary the project will fail, 
the Secretary may take such action as may be necessary to restore the 
integrity and effectiveness of the project.
    (b) Priority.--The Secretary shall carry out an evaluation and take 
such actions as may be necessary under subsection (a) for the project 
for flood damage reduction, Arkansas River Levees, Arkansas.
SEC. 5005. FLOOD MITIGATION PRIORITY AREAS.
    (a) In General.--Section 212(e) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (33 U.S.C. 2332(e); 114 Stat. 2599) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraphs (23) and (27);
        (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (28) and 
    inserting a semicolon; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(29) Ascension Parish, Louisiana;
        ``(30) East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana;
        ``(31) Iberville Parish, Louisiana;
        ``(32) Livingston Parish, Louisiana; and
        ``(33) Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 212(i)(1) of such Act 
(33 U.S.C. 2332(i)(1)) is amended by striking ``section--'' and all 
that follows before the period at the end and inserting ``section 
$20,000,000''.
SEC. 5006. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR AUTHORIZED PROJECTS.
    (a) In General.--Section 219(e) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334) is 
amended--
        (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (7);
        (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (8) and 
    inserting a semicolon; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(9) $35,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(18);
        ``(10) $27,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(19);
        ``(11) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(20);
        ``(12) $35,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(23);
        ``(13) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(25);
        ``(14) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(26);
        ``(15) $35,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(27);
        ``(16) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(28); and
        ``(17) $30,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(40).''.
    (b) East Arkansas Enterprise Community, Arkansas.--Federal 
assistance made available under the rural enterprise zone program of 
the Department of Agriculture may be used toward payment of the non-
Federal share of the costs of the project described in section 
219(c)(20) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 
2763A-219) if such assistance is authorized to be used for such 
purposes.
SEC. 5007. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR CERTAIN 
PROJECTS.
    The Secretary shall expedite completion of the reports and, if the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible, shall expedite 
completion of construction for the following projects:
        (1) Project for navigation, Whittier, Alaska.
        (2) Laguna Creek watershed flood damage reduction project, 
    California.
        (3) Daytona Beach shore protection project, Florida.
        (4) Flagler Beach shore protection project, Florida.
        (5) St. Johns County shore protection project, Florida.
        (6) Chenier Plain environmental restoration project, Louisiana.
        (7) False River, Louisiana, being carried out under section 206 
    of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
        (8) North River, Peabody, Massachusetts, being carried out 
    under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
    701s).
        (9) Fulmer Creek, Village of Mohawk, New York, being carried 
    out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
    701s).
        (10) Moyer Creek, Village of Frankfort, New York, being carried 
    out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
    701s).
        (11) Steele Creek, Village of Ilion, New York, being carried 
    out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
    701s).
        (12) Oriskany Wildlife Management Area, Rome, New York, being 
    carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources Development 
    Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
        (13) Whitney Point Lake, Otselic River, Whitney Point, New 
    York, being carried out under section 1135 of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a).
        (14) Chenango Lake, Chenango County, New York, being carried 
    out under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
    1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
SEC. 5008. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall expedite completion of the 
reports for the following projects and, if the Secretary determines 
that a project is justified in the completed report, proceed directly 
to project preconstruction, engineering, and design:
        (1) Project for water supply, Little Red River, Arkansas.
        (2) Watershed study, Fountain Creek, north of Pueblo, Colorado.
        (3) Project for shoreline stabilization at Egmont Key, Florida.
        (4) Project for navigation, Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas and 
    Louisiana.
        (5) Project for ecosystem restoration, University Lake, Baton 
    Rouge, Louisiana.
    (b) Special Rule for Egmont Key, Florida.--In carrying out the 
project for shoreline stabilization at Egmont Key, Florida, referred to 
in subsection (a)(3), the Secretary shall waive any cost share to be 
provided by non-Federal interests for any portion of the project that 
benefits federally owned property.
SEC. 5009. SOUTHEASTERN WATER RESOURCES ASSESSMENT.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal expense, 
an assessment of the water resources needs of the river basins and 
watersheds of the southeastern United States.
    (b) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out the assessment, the 
Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements with State and local 
agencies, non-Federal and nonprofit entities, and regional researchers.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $7,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5010. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT PROJECT.
    Section 514 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 343; 117 Stat. 142) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (b)(2)(A) by adding at the end the following: 
    ``The Secretary shall ensure that such activities are carried out 
    throughout the geographic area that is subject to the plan.'';
        (2) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g) 
    and (h), respectively;
        (3) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:
    ``(f) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project or 
activity carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may 
include a nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local 
government.'';
        (4) in subsection (g) (as redesignated by paragraph (2) of this 
    section) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(4) Non-federal share.--
            ``(A) In general.--The non-Federal share of the costs of 
        activities carried out under the plan may be provided--
                ``(i) in cash;
                ``(ii) by the provision of land, easements, rights-of-
            way, relocations, or disposal areas;
                ``(iii) by in-kind services to implement the project; 
            or
                ``(iv) by any combination thereof.
            ``(B) Private ownership.--Land needed for activities 
        carried out under the plan and credited toward the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of an activity may remain in private 
        ownership subject to easements that are--
                ``(i) satisfactory to the Secretary; and
                ``(ii) necessary to ensure achievement of the project 
            purposes.''; and
        (5) in subsection (h) (as redesignated by paragraph (2) of this 
    section) by striking ``for the period of fiscal years 2003 and 
    2004.'' and inserting ``per fiscal year through fiscal year 
    2015.''.
SEC. 5011. GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROGRAM.
    (a) Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration.--Section 506(c) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-22(c)) 
is amended--
        (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) 
    and (4), respectively;
        (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
        ``(2) Reconnaissance studies.--Before planning, designing, or 
    constructing a project under paragraph (3), the Secretary shall 
    carry out a reconnaissance study--
            ``(A) to identify methods of restoring the fishery, 
        ecosystem, and beneficial uses of the Great Lakes; and
            ``(B) to determine whether planning of a project under 
        paragraph (3) should proceed.''; and
        (3) in paragraph (4)(A) (as redesignated by paragraph (1) of 
    this subsection) by striking ``paragraph (2)'' and inserting 
    ``paragraph (3)''.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Section 506(f) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-22(f)) is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (2)--
            (A) by striking ``The Federal share'' and inserting 
        ``Except for reconnaissance studies, the Federal share''; and
            (B) by striking ``(2) or (3)'' and inserting ``(3) or 
        (4)'';
        (2) in paragraph (3)--
            (A) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``subsection (c)(2)'' 
        and inserting ``subsection (c)(3)''; and
            (B) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``50 percent'' and 
        inserting ``100 percent''; and
        (3) in paragraph (5) by striking ``Notwithstanding'' and 
    inserting ``In accordance with''.
SEC. 5012. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS AND SEDIMENT REMEDIATION.
    Section 401(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 1268 note; 104 Stat. 4644; 114 Stat. 2613) is amended by 
striking ``through 2006'' and inserting ``through 2012''.
SEC. 5013. GREAT LAKES TRIBUTARY MODELS.
    Section 516(g)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(33 U.S.C. 2326b(g)(2)) is amended by striking ``through 2006'' and 
inserting ``through 2012''.
SEC. 5014. GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION AND PROTECTION.
    (a) Great Lakes Navigation.--Using available funds, the Secretary 
shall expedite the operation and maintenance, including dredging, of 
the navigation features of the Great Lakes and Connecting Channels for 
the purpose of supporting commercial navigation to authorized project 
depths.
    (b) Great Lakes Pilot Project.--Using available funds, the Director 
of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, in coordination with 
the Secretary, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, and the Director of the 
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, shall carry out a pilot 
project, on an emergency basis, to control and prevent further 
spreading of viral hemorrhagic septicemia in the Great Lakes and 
Connecting Channels.
    (c) Great Lakes and Connecting Channels Defined.--In this section, 
the term ``Great Lakes and Connecting Channels'' includes Lakes 
Superior, Huron, Michigan, Erie, and Ontario, all connecting waters 
between and among such lakes used for commercial navigation, any 
navigation features in such lakes or waters that are a Federal 
operation or maintenance responsibility, and areas of the Saint 
Lawrence River that are operated or maintained by the Federal 
Government for commercial navigation.
SEC. 5015. SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized, using amounts 
contributed by the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation under 
subsection (b), to carry out projects for operations, maintenance, 
repair, and rehabilitation, including associated maintenance dredging, 
of the Eisenhower and Snell lock facilities and related navigational 
infrastructure for the Saint Lawrence Seaway, at a total cost of 
$134,650,000.
    (b) Source of Funds.--The Secretary is authorized to accept funds 
from the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation to carry out 
projects under this section. Such funds may include amounts made 
available to the Corporation from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund and 
the general fund of the Treasury of the United States pursuant to 
section 210 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2238).
    (c) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section 
authorizes the construction of any project to increase the depth or 
width of the navigation channel to a level greater than that previously 
authorized and existing on the date of enactment of this Act or to 
increase the dimensions of the Eisenhower and Snell lock facilities.
SEC. 5016. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER DISPERSAL BARRIER PROJECT.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with appropriate 
Federal and State agencies, shall study, design, and carry out a 
project to delay, deter, impede, or restrict the dispersal of aquatic 
nuisance species into the northern reaches of the Upper Mississippi 
River system. The Secretary shall complete the study, design, and 
construction of the project not later than 6 months after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
    (b) Dispersal Barrier.--In carrying out subsection (a), the 
Secretary, at Federal expense, shall--
        (1) investigate and identify environmentally sound methods for 
    preventing and reducing the dispersal of aquatic nuisance species 
    through the northern reaches of the Upper Mississippi River system;
        (2) use available technologies and measures;
        (3) monitor and evaluate, in cooperation with the Director of 
    the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the effectiveness of 
    the project in preventing and reducing the dispersal of aquatic 
    nuisance species through the northern reaches of the Upper 
    Mississippi River system;
        (4) submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
    Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
    Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on the results 
    of the evaluation conducted under paragraph (3); and
        (5) operate and maintain the project.
    (c) Requirement.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall take into consideration the feasibility of locating the 
dispersal barrier at the lock portion of the project at Lock and Dam 11 
in the Upper Mississippi River basin.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $4,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5017. ESTUARY RESTORATION.
    (a) Purposes.--Section 102 of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 
(33 U.S.C. 2901) is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (1) by inserting before the semicolon at the 
    end the following: ``by implementing a coordinated Federal approach 
    to estuary habitat restoration activities, including the use of 
    common monitoring standards and a common system for tracking 
    restoration acreage'';
        (2) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``and implement'' after ``to 
    develop''; and
        (3) in paragraph (3) by inserting ``through cooperative 
    agreements'' after ``restoration projects''.
    (b) Definition of Estuary Habitat Restoration Plan.--Section 
103(6)(A) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2902(6)(A)) 
is amended by striking ``Federal or State'' and inserting ``Federal, 
State, or regional''.
    (c) Estuary Habitat Restoration Program.--Section 104 of the 
Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2903) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a) by inserting ``through the award of 
    contracts and cooperative agreements'' after ``assistance'';
        (2) in subsection (c)--
            (A) in paragraph (3)(A) by inserting ``or State'' after 
        ``Federal''; and
            (B) in paragraph (4)(B) by inserting ``or approach'' after 
        ``technology'';
        (3) in subsection (d)--
            (A) in paragraph (1)--
                (i) by striking ``Except'' and inserting the following:
            ``(A) In general.--Except''; and
                (ii) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) Monitoring.--
                ``(i) Costs.--The costs of monitoring an estuary 
            habitat restoration project funded under this title may be 
            included in the total cost of the estuary habitat 
            restoration project.
                ``(ii) Goals.--The goals of the monitoring shall be--

                    ``(I) to measure the effectiveness of the 
                restoration project; and
                    ``(II) to allow adaptive management to ensure 
                project success.'';

            (B) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``or approach'' after 
        ``technology''; and
            (C) in paragraph (3) by inserting ``(including 
        monitoring)'' after ``services'';
        (4) in subsection (f)(1)(B) by inserting ``long-term'' before 
    ``maintenance''; and
        (5) in subsection (g)--
            (A) by striking ``In carrying'' and inserting the 
        following:
        ``(1) In general.--In carrying''; and
            (B) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(2) Small projects.--
            ``(A) Small project defined.--In this paragraph, the term 
        `small project' means a project carried out under this title 
        with an estimated Federal cost of less than $1,000,000.
            ``(B) Delegation of project implementation.--In carrying 
        out this section, the Secretary, on recommendation of the 
        Council, may delegate implementation of a small project to--
                ``(i) the Secretary of the Interior (acting through the 
            Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service);
                ``(ii) the Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere of 
            the Department of Commerce;
                ``(iii) the Administrator of the Environmental 
            Protection Agency; or
                ``(iv) the Secretary of Agriculture.
            ``(C) Funding.--A small project delegated to the head of a 
        Federal department or agency under this paragraph may be 
        carried out using funds appropriated to the department or 
        agency under section 109(a)(1) or other funds available to the 
        department or agency.
            ``(D) Agreements.--The head of a Federal department or 
        agency to which a small project is delegated under this 
        paragraph shall enter into an agreement with the non-Federal 
        interest for the project generally in conformance with the 
        criteria in subsections (d) and (e). Cooperative agreements may 
        be used for any delegated project to allow the non-Federal 
        interest to carry out the project on behalf of the Federal 
        agency.''.
    (d) Establishment of Estuary Habitat Restoration Council.--Section 
105(b) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2904(b)) is 
amended--
        (1) in paragraph (4) by striking ``and'' after the semicolon;
        (2) in paragraph (5) by striking the period at the end and 
    inserting a semicolon; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(6) cooperating in the implementation of the strategy 
    developed under section 106;
        ``(7) recommending standards for monitoring for restoration 
    projects and contribution of project information to the database 
    developed under section 107; and
        ``(8) otherwise using the respective authorities of the Council 
    members to carry out this title.''.
    (e) Monitoring of Estuary Habitat Restoration Projects.--Section 
107(d) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2906(d)) is 
amended by striking ``compile'' and inserting ``have general data 
compilation, coordination, and analysis responsibilities to carry out 
this title and in support of the strategy developed under this section, 
including compilation of''.
    (f) Reporting.--Section 108(a) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 
2000 (33 U.S.C. 2907(a)) is amended by striking ``At the end of the 
third and fifth fiscal years following the date of enactment of this 
Act'' and inserting ``Not later than September 30, 2008, and every 2 
years thereafter''.
    (g) Funding.--Section 109(a) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 
(33 U.S.C. 2908(a)) is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (1)--
            (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by striking 
        ``to the Secretary''; and
            (B) by striking subparagraphs (A) through (D) and inserting 
        the following:
            ``(A) to the Secretary, $25,000,000 for each of fiscal 
        years 2008 through 2012;
            ``(B) to the Secretary of the Interior (acting through the 
        Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service), 
        $2,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012;
            ``(C) to the Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere of 
        the Department of Commerce, $2,500,000 for each of fiscal years 
        2008 through 2012;
            ``(D) to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
        Agency, $2,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2012; 
        and
            ``(E) to the Secretary of Agriculture, $2,500,000 for each 
        of fiscal years 2008 through 2012.''; and
        (2) in the first sentence of paragraph (2)--
            (A) by inserting ``and other information compiled under 
        section 107'' after ``this title''; and
            (B) by striking ``2005'' and inserting ``2012''.
    (h) General Provisions.--Section 110 of the Estuary Restoration Act 
of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2909) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (b)(1)--
            (A) by inserting ``or contracts'' after ``agreements''; and
            (B) by inserting ``, nongovernmental organizations,'' after 
        ``agencies''; and
        (2) by striking subsections (d) and (e).
SEC. 5018. MISSOURI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MITIGATION, RECOVERY, AND 
RESTORATION, IOWA, KANSAS, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, 
SOUTH DAKOTA, AND WYOMING.
    (a) Study.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
    Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee to be established 
    under subsection (b)(1), shall conduct a study of the Missouri 
    River and its tributaries to determine actions required--
            (A) to mitigate losses of aquatic and terrestrial habitat;
            (B) to recover federally listed species under the 
        Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
            (C) to restore the ecosystem to prevent further declines 
        among other native species.
        (2) Funding.--The study to be conducted under paragraph (1) 
    shall be funded using amounts made available to carry out the 
    Missouri River recovery and mitigation plan authorized by section 
    601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
    4143).
    (b) Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee.--
        (1) Establishment.--Not later than 6 months after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish a committee to 
    be known as the Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee 
    (in this section referred to as the ``Committee'').
        (2) Membership.--The Committee shall include representatives 
    from--
            (A) Federal agencies;
            (B) States located near the Missouri River basin; and
            (C) other appropriate entities, as determined by the 
        Secretary, including--
                (i) water management and fish and wildlife agencies;
                (ii) Indian tribes located near the Missouri River 
            basin; and
                (iii) nongovernmental stakeholders, which may include--

                    (I) navigation interests;
                    (II) irrigation interests;
                    (III) flood control interests;
                    (IV) fish, wildlife, and conservation 
                organizations;
                    (V) recreation interests; and
                    (VI) power supply interests.

        (3) Duties.--The Committee shall--
            (A) with respect to the study to be conducted under 
        subsection (a)(1), provide guidance to the Secretary and any 
        affected Federal agency, State agency, or Indian tribe; and
            (B) provide guidance to the Secretary with respect to the 
        Missouri River recovery and mitigation plan in existence on the 
        date of enactment of this Act, including recommendations 
        relating to--
                (i) changes to the implementation strategy from the use 
            of adaptive management;
                (ii) coordination of the development of consistent 
            policies, strategies, plans, programs, projects, 
            activities, and priorities for the Missouri River recovery 
            and mitigation plan;
                (iii) exchange of information regarding programs, 
            projects, and activities of the agencies and entities 
            represented on the Committee to promote the goals of the 
            Missouri River recovery and mitigation plan;
                (iv) establishment of such working groups as the 
            Committee determines to be necessary to assist in carrying 
            out the duties of the Committee, including duties relating 
            to public policy and scientific issues;
                (v) facilitating the resolution of interagency and 
            intergovernmental conflicts between entities represented on 
            the Committee associated with the Missouri River recovery 
            and mitigation plan;
                (vi) coordination of scientific and other research 
            associated with the Missouri River recovery and mitigation 
            plan; and
                (vii) annual preparation of a work plan and associated 
            budget requests.
        (4) Recommendations and guidance.--In providing recommendations 
    and guidance from the Committee, the members of the Committee may 
    include dissenting opinions.
        (5) Compensation; travel expenses.--
            (A) Compensation.--Members of the Committee shall not 
        receive compensation from the Secretary in carrying out the 
        duties of the Committee under this section.
            (B) Travel expenses.--Travel expenses incurred by a member 
        of the Committee in carrying out the duties of the Committee 
        under this section shall not be eligible for Federal 
        reimbursement.
    (c) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the Committee.
SEC. 5019. SUSQUEHANNA, DELAWARE, AND POTOMAC RIVER BASINS, DELAWARE, 
MARYLAND, PENNSYLVANIA, AND VIRGINIA.
    (a) Ex Officio Member.--Notwithstanding section 3001(a) of the 1997 
Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery From Natural 
Disasters, and for Overseas Peacekeeping Efforts, Including Those in 
Bosnia (Public Law 105-18; 111 Stat. 176), section 2.2 of the 
Susquehanna River Basin Compact to which consent was given by Public 
Law 91-575 (84 Stat. 1512), and section 2.2 of the Delaware River Basin 
Compact to which consent was given by Public Law 87-328 (75 Stat. 691), 
beginning in fiscal year 2002, and each fiscal year thereafter, the 
Division Engineer, North Atlantic Division, Corps of Engineers--
        (1) shall be--
            (A) the ex officio United States member of the Susquehanna 
        River Basin Compact and the Delaware River Basin Compact; and
            (B) one of the 3 members appointed by the President under 
        the Potomac River Basin Compact to which consent was given by 
        Public Law 91-407 (84 Stat. 856);
        (2) shall serve without additional compensation; and
        (3) may designate an alternate member in accordance with the 
    terms of those compacts.
    (b) Authorization To Allocate.--The Secretary shall allocate funds 
to the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, Delaware River Basin 
Commission, and the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin to 
fulfill the equitable funding requirements of the respective interstate 
compacts.
    (c) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Delaware River Basin.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an agreement 
    with the Delaware River Basin Commission to provide temporary water 
    supply and conservation storage at the Francis E. Walter Dam, 
    Pennsylvania, for any period during which the Commission has 
    determined that a drought warning or drought emergency exists.
        (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that the cost for 
    water supply and conservation storage under paragraph (1) shall not 
    exceed the incremental operating costs associated with providing 
    the storage.
    (d) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Susquehanna River 
Basin.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an agreement 
    with the Susquehanna River Basin Commission to provide temporary 
    water supply and conservation storage at Federal facilities 
    operated by the Corps of Engineers in the Susquehanna River basin 
    for any period for which the Commission has determined that a 
    drought warning or drought emergency exists.
        (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that the cost for 
    water supply and conservation storage under paragraph (1) shall not 
    exceed the incremental operating costs associated with providing 
    the storage.
    (e) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Potomac River Basin.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an agreement 
    with the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin to 
    provide temporary water supply and conservation storage at Federal 
    facilities operated by the Corps of Engineers in the Potomac River 
    basin for any period for which the Commission has determined that a 
    drought warning or drought emergency exists.
        (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that the cost for 
    water supply and conservation storage under paragraph (1) shall not 
    exceed the incremental operating costs associated with providing 
    the storage.
SEC. 5020. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION 
PROGRAM.
    (a) Form of Assistance.--Section 510(a)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3759) is amended by striking ``, and 
beneficial uses of dredged material'' and inserting ``, beneficial uses 
of dredged material, and restoration of submerged aquatic vegetation''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 510(i) of such Act 
(110 Stat. 3761) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting 
``$40,000,000''.
SEC. 5021. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RESTORATION, VIRGINIA AND MARYLAND.
    Section 704(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2263(b)) is amended--
        (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (4);
        (2) in paragraph (1)--
            (A) in the second sentence by striking ``$30,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$50,000,000''; and
            (B) in the third sentence by striking ``Such projects'' and 
        inserting the following:
        ``(2) Inclusions.--Such projects'';
        (3) by striking paragraph (2)(D) (as redesignated by paragraph 
    (2)(B) of this subsection) and inserting the following:
            ``(D) the restoration and rehabilitation of habitat for 
        fish, including native oysters, in the Chesapeake Bay and its 
        tributaries in Virginia and Maryland, including--
                ``(i) the construction of oyster bars and reefs;
                ``(ii) the rehabilitation of existing marginal habitat;
                ``(iii) the use of appropriate alternative substrate 
            material in oyster bar and reef construction;
                ``(iv) the construction and upgrading of oyster 
            hatcheries; and
                ``(v) activities relating to increasing the output of 
            native oyster broodstock for seeding and monitoring of 
            restored sites to ensure ecological success.
        ``(3) Restoration and rehabilitation activities.--The 
    restoration and rehabilitation activities described in paragraph 
    (2)(D) shall be--
            ``(A) for the purpose of establishing permanent sanctuaries 
        and harvest management areas; and
            ``(B) consistent with plans and strategies for guiding the 
        restoration of the Chesapeake Bay oyster resource and 
        fishery.''; and
        (4) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(5) Definition of ecological success.--In this subsection, 
    the term `ecological success' means--
            ``(A) achieving a tenfold increase in native oyster biomass 
        by the year 2010, from a 1994 baseline; and
            ``(B) the establishment of a sustainable fishery as 
        determined by a broad scientific and economic consensus.''.
SEC. 5022. HYPOXIA ASSESSMENT.
    The Secretary may participate with Federal, State, and local 
agencies, non-Federal and nonprofit entities, regional researchers, and 
other interested parties to assess hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico.
SEC. 5023. POTOMAC RIVER WATERSHED ASSESSMENT AND TRIBUTARY STRATEGY 
EVALUATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM.
    The Secretary may participate in the Potomac River watershed 
assessment and tributary strategy evaluation and monitoring program to 
identify a series of resource management indicators to accurately 
monitor the effectiveness of the implementation of the agreed upon 
tributary strategies and other public policies that pertain to natural 
resource protection of the Potomac River watershed.
SEC. 5024. LOCK AND DAM SECURITY.
    (a) Standards.--The Secretary, in consultation with the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and the 
Coast Guard, shall develop standards for the security of locks and 
dams, including the testing and certification of vessel exclusion 
barriers.
    (b) Site Surveys.--At the request of a lock or dam owner, the 
Secretary shall provide technical assistance, on a reimbursable basis, 
to improve lock or dam security.
    (c) Cooperative Agreement.--The Secretary may enter into a 
cooperative agreement with a nonprofit alliance of public and private 
organizations that has the mission of promoting safe waterways and 
seaports to carry out testing and certification activities, and to 
perform site surveys, under this section.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $3,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5025. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR COLUMBIA AND SNAKE 
RIVER SALMON SURVIVAL.
    Section 511 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (16 
U.S.C. 3301 note; 110 Stat. 3761; 113 Stat. 375) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a)(6) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
    inserting ``$25,000,000''; and
        (2) in subsection (c)(2) by striking ``$1,000,000'' and 
    inserting ``$10,000,000''.
SEC. 5026. WAGE SURVEYS.
    Employees of the Corps of Engineers who are paid wages determined 
under the last undesignated paragraph under the heading 
``Administrative Provisions'' of chapter V of the Supplemental 
Appropriations Act, 1982 (5 U.S.C. 5343 note; 96 Stat. 832) shall be 
allowed, through appropriate employee organization representatives, to 
participate in wage surveys under such paragraph to the same extent as 
are prevailing rate employees under subsection (c)(2) of section 5343 
of title 5, United States Code. Nothing in such section 5343 shall be 
construed to affect which agencies are to be surveyed under such 
paragraph.
SEC. 5027. REHABILITATION.
    The Secretary, at Federal expense and in an amount not to exceed 
$1,000,000, shall rehabilitate and improve the water-related 
infrastructure and the transportation infrastructure for the historic 
property in the Anacostia River watershed located in the District of 
Columbia, including measures to address wet weather conditions. To 
carry out this section, the Secretary shall accept funds provided for 
such project under any other Federal program.
SEC. 5028. AUBURN, ALABAMA.
    The Secretary may provide technical assistance relating to water 
supply to Auburn, Alabama. There is authorized to be appropriated 
$5,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5029. PINHOOK CREEK, HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA.
    (a) Project Authorization.--The Secretary shall design and 
construct the locally preferred plan for flood protection at Pinhook 
Creek, Huntsville, Alabama. In carrying out the project, the Secretary 
shall utilize, to the extent practicable, the existing detailed project 
report for the project prepared under the authority of section 205 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
    (b) Participation by Non-Federal Interest.--The Secretary shall 
allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of the 
project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) if the detailed project report 
evaluation indicates that applying such section is necessary to 
implement the project.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of work carried 
out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project.
SEC. 5030. ALASKA.
    Section 570 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 369) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (c) by inserting ``environmental 
    restoration,'' after ``water supply and related facilities,'';
        (2) in subsection (e)(3)(B) by striking the last sentence;
        (3) in subsection (h) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting 
    ``$45,000,000''; and
        (4) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    ``(j) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.''.
SEC. 5031. BARROW, ALASKA.
    The Secretary shall carry out, under section 117 of the Energy and 
Water Development Appropriations Act, 2005 (118 Stat. 2944), a 
nonstructural project for coastal erosion and storm damage prevention 
and reduction at Barrow, Alaska, including relocation of 
infrastructure.
SEC. 5032. LOWELL CREEK TUNNEL, SEWARD, ALASKA.
    (a) Long-Term Maintenance and Repair.--
        (1) Maintenance and repair.--The Secretary shall assume 
    responsibility for the long-term maintenance and repair of the 
    Lowell Creek tunnel, Seward, Alaska.
        (2) Duration of responsibilities.--The responsibility of the 
    Secretary for long-term maintenance and repair of the tunnel shall 
    continue until an alternative method of flood diversion is 
    constructed and operational under this section, or 15 years after 
    the date of enactment of this Act, whichever is earlier.
    (b) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
whether an alternative method of flood diversion in Lowell Canyon is 
feasible.
    (c) Construction.--
        (1) Alternative methods.--If the Secretary determines under the 
    study conducted under subsection (b) that an alternative method of 
    flood diversion in Lowell Canyon is feasible, the Secretary shall 
    carry out the alternative method.
        (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of carrying 
    out an alternative method under paragraph (1) shall be the same as 
    the Federal share of the cost of the construction of the Lowell 
    Creek tunnel.
SEC. 5033. ST. HERMAN AND ST. PAUL HARBORS, KODIAK, ALASKA.
    The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency basis, necessary 
removal of rubble, sediment, and rock impeding the entrance to the St. 
Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, Alaska, at a Federal cost of 
$2,000,000.
SEC. 5034. TANANA RIVER, ALASKA.
    The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency basis, the removal 
of the hazard to navigation on the Tanana River, Alaska, near the mouth 
of the Chena River, as described in the January 3, 2005, memorandum 
from the Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard District, to the Corps of 
Engineers, Alaska District, Anchorage, Alaska.
SEC. 5035. WRANGELL HARBOR, ALASKA.
    (a) General Navigation Features.--In carrying out the project for 
navigation, Wrangell Harbor, Alaska, authorized by section 101(b)(1) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), the 
Secretary shall consider the dredging of the mooring basin and 
construction of the inner harbor facilities to be general navigation 
features for purposes of estimating the non-Federal share of project 
costs.
    (b) Revision of Partnership Agreement.--The Secretary shall revise 
the partnership agreement for the project to reflect the change 
required by subsection (a).
SEC. 5036. AUGUSTA AND CLARENDON, ARKANSAS.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out rehabilitation of 
authorized and completed levees on the White River between Augusta and 
Clarendon, Arkansas, at a total estimated cost of $8,000,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $5,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $2,800,000.
    (b) Reimbursement.--After performing the rehabilitation under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall seek reimbursement from the 
Secretary of the Interior of an amount equal to the costs allocated to 
benefits to a Federal wildlife refuge of such rehabilitation.
SEC. 5037. DES ARC LEVEE PROTECTION, ARKANSAS.
    The Secretary shall review the project for flood control, Des Arc, 
Arkansas, to determine whether bank and channel scour along the White 
River threaten the existing project and whether the scour is a result 
of a design deficiency. If the Secretary determines that such 
conditions exist as a result of a deficiency, the Secretary shall carry 
out measures to eliminate the deficiency.
SEC. 5038. LOOMIS LANDING, ARKANSAS.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study of shore damage in the vicinity 
of Loomis Landing, Arkansas, to determine if the damage is the result 
of a Federal navigation project, and, if the Secretary determines that 
the damage is the result of a Federal navigation project, the Secretary 
shall carry out a project to mitigate the damage under section 111 of 
the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i).
SEC. 5039. CALIFORNIA.
    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
California.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in California, including projects for wastewater treatment and 
related facilities, water supply and related facilities, environmental 
restoration, and surface water resource protection and development.
    (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (d) Partnership Agreements.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
    with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and construction 
    of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
    entered into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        or resource protection and development plan, including 
        appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
        under this section--
                (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
            reimbursements of project costs.
            (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
        (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
        of the project the cost of design work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.
            (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
        of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is the 
        subject of an agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
        interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred 
        in providing the non-Federal share.
            (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
        non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs (including all reasonable costs associated with 
        obtaining permits necessary for the construction, operation, 
        and maintenance of the project on publicly owned or controlled 
        land), but the credit may not exceed 25 percent of total 
        project costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (f) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity.
    (g) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of 
amounts made available to carry out this section may be used by the 
Corps of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this 
section at Federal expense.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.
SEC. 5040. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, 
STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) In General.--Unless the Secretary determines, by not later than 
30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, that the relocation of 
the portion of the project described in subsection (b)(2) would be 
injurious to the public interest, a non-Federal interest may 
reconstruct and relocate that portion of the project approximately 300 
feet in a westerly direction.
    (b) Project Description.--
        (1) In general.--The project referred to in subsection (a) is 
    the project for flood control, Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek 
    and tributaries, California, authorized by section 10 of the Flood 
    Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 902).
        (2) Specific description.--The portion of the project to be 
    reconstructed and relocated is that portion consisting of 
    approximately 5.34 acres of dry land levee beginning at a point N. 
    2203542.3167, E. 6310930.1385, thence running west about 59.99 feet 
    to a point N. 2203544.6562, E. 6310870.1468, thence running south 
    about 3,874.99 feet to a point N. 2199669.8760, E. 6310861.7956, 
    thence running east about 60.00 feet to a point N. 2199668.8026, E. 
    6310921.7900, thence running north about 3,873.73 feet to the point 
    of origin.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
reconstructing and relocating the portion of the project described in 
subsection (b)(2) shall be 100 percent.
SEC. 5041. CAMBRIA, CALIFORNIA.
    Section 219(f)(48) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``$10,300,000'' and inserting the following:
            ``(A) In general.--$10,300,000'';
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance 
        with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
        1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
        project not to exceed $3,000,000 for the cost of planning and 
        design work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
        project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
        project.''; and
        (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph (A) 
    (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with subparagraph 
    (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).
SEC. 5042. CONTRA COSTA CANAL, OAKLEY AND KNIGHTSEN, CALIFORNIA; 
MALLARD SLOUGH, PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA.
    Sections 512 and 514 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2650) are each amended by adding at the end the following: 
``All planning, study, design, and construction on the project shall be 
carried out by the office of the district engineer, San Francisco, 
California.''.
SEC. 5043. DANA POINT HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the causes of water quality 
degradation within Dana Point Harbor, California, to determine if the 
degradation is the result of a Federal navigation project, and, if the 
Secretary determines that the degradation is the result of a Federal 
navigation project, the Secretary shall carry out a project to mitigate 
the degradation at Federal expense.
SEC. 5044. EAST SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
    Section 219(f)(22) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 336) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting the following:
            ``(A) In general.--$25,000,000'';
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance 
        with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
        1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
        project the cost of design and construction work carried out by 
        the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.
            ``(C) In-kind contributions.--The non-Federal interest may 
        provide any portion of the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
        project in the form of in-kind services and materials.''; and
        (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph (A) 
    (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with subparagraph 
    (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).
SEC. 5045. EASTERN SANTA CLARA BASIN, CALIFORNIA.
    Section 111(c) of the Miscellaneous Appropriations Act, 2001 (as 
enacted into law by Public Law 106-554; 114 Stat. 2763A-224) is 
amended--
        (1) by striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting ``$28,000,000''; 
    and
        (2) by striking ``$7,000,000'' and inserting ``$10,000,000''.
SEC. 5046. LA-3 DREDGED MATERIAL OCEAN DISPOSAL SITE DESIGNATION, 
CALIFORNIA.
    The third sentence of section 102(c)(4) of the Marine Protection, 
Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1412(c)(4)) is amended 
by striking ``January 1, 2003'' and inserting ``January 1, 2011''.
SEC. 5047. LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA.
    Section 219(f)(50) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended--
        (1) by inserting after ``water'' the following: ``and 
    wastewater''; and
        (2) by striking ``$14,500,000'' and inserting ``$24,500,000''.
SEC. 5048. LOS OSOS, CALIFORNIA.
    Section 219(c)(27) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(114 Stat. 2763A-219) is amended to read as follows:
        ``(27) Los osos, california.--Wastewater infrastructure, Los 
    Osos, California.''.
SEC. 5049. PINE FLAT DAM FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) Cooperative Program.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall participate with 
    appropriate State and local agencies in the implementation of a 
    cooperative program to improve and manage fisheries and aquatic 
    habitat conditions in Pine Flat Reservoir and in the 14-mile reach 
    of the Kings River immediately below Pine Flat Dam, California, in 
    a manner that--
            (A) provides for long-term aquatic resource enhancement; 
        and
            (B) avoids adverse effects on water storage and water 
        rights holders.
        (2) Goals and principles.--The cooperative program described in 
    paragraph (1) shall be carried out--
            (A) substantially in accordance with the goals and 
        principles of the document entitled ``Kings River Fisheries 
        Management Program Framework Agreement'' and dated May 29, 
        1999, between the California department of fish and game and 
        the Kings River Water Association and the Kings River 
        Conservation District; and
            (B) in cooperation with the parties to that agreement.
    (b) Participation by Secretary.--
        (1) In general.--In furtherance of the goals of the agreement 
    described in subsection (a)(2), the Secretary shall participate in 
    the planning, design, and construction of projects and pilot 
    projects on the Kings River and its tributaries to enhance aquatic 
    habitat and water availability for fisheries purposes (including 
    maintenance of a trout fishery) in accordance with flood control 
    operations, water rights, and beneficial uses in existence as of 
    the date of enactment of this Act.
        (2) Projects.--Projects referred to in paragraph (1) may 
    include--
            (A) projects to construct or improve pumping, conveyance, 
        and storage facilities to enhance water transfers; and
            (B) projects to carry out water exchanges and create 
        opportunities to use floodwater within and downstream of Pine 
        Flat Reservoir.
    (c) No Authorization of Certain Dam-Related Projects.--Nothing in 
this section shall be construed to authorize any project for the 
raising of Pine Flat Dam or the construction of a multilevel intake 
structure at Pine Flat Dam.
    (d) Use of Existing Studies.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall use, to the maximum extent practicable, studies in 
existence on the date of enactment of this Act, including data and 
environmental documentation in the document entitled ``Final 
Feasibility Report and Report of the Chief of Engineers for Pine Flat 
Dam Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration'' and dated July 19, 2002.
    (e) Credit for Land, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--The Secretary 
shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of construction 
of any project under subsection (b) the value, regardless of the date 
of acquisition, of any land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged material 
disposal areas, or relocations provided by the non-Federal interest for 
use in carrying out the project.
    (f) Operation and Maintenance.--The operation, maintenance, repair, 
rehabilitation, and replacement of projects carried out under this 
section shall be a non-Federal responsibility.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.
SEC. 5050. RAYMOND BASIN, SIX BASINS, CHINO BASIN, AND SAN GABRIEL 
BASIN, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) Comprehensive Plan.--The Secretary, in consultation and 
coordination with appropriate Federal, State, and local entities, shall 
develop a comprehensive plan for the management of water resources in 
the Raymond Basin, Six Basins, Chino Basin, and San Gabriel Basin, 
California. The Secretary may carry out activities identified in the 
comprehensive plan to demonstrate practicable alternatives for water 
resources management.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
of operation and maintenance of any measures constructed under this 
section shall be 100 percent.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.
SEC. 5051. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the Port of San 
Francisco, California, may carry out the project for repair and 
removal, as appropriate, of Piers 30-32, 35, 36, 70 (including Wharves 
7 and 8), and 80 in San Francisco, California, substantially in 
accordance with the Port's redevelopment plan.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriation.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5052. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, WATERFRONT AREA.
    (a) Area to Be Declared Nonnavigable; Public Interest.--Unless the 
Secretary finds, after consultation with local and regional public 
officials (including local and regional public planning organizations), 
that the proposed projects to be undertaken within the boundaries of 
the portion of the San Francisco, California, waterfront area described 
in subsection (b) are not in the public interest, such portion is 
declared to be nonnavigable waters of the United States.
    (b) Northern Embarcadero South of Bryant Street.--The portion of 
the San Francisco, California, waterfront area referred to in 
subsection (a) is as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the 
northeasterly prolongation of that portion of the northwesterly line of 
Bryant Street lying between Beale Street and Main Street with the 
southwesterly line of Spear Street, which intersection lies on the line 
of jurisdiction of the San Francisco Port Commission; following thence 
southerly along said line of jurisdiction as described in the State of 
California Harbor and Navigation Code Section 1770, as amended in 1961, 
to its intersection with the southeasterly line of Townsend Street; 
thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line of Townsend Street, 
to its intersection with a line that is parallel and distant 10 feet 
southerly from the existing southern boundary of Pier 40 produced; 
thence easterly along said parallel line, to its point of intersection 
with the United States Government Pierhead line; thence northerly along 
said Pierhead line to its intersection with a line parallel with, and 
distant 10 feet easterly from, the existing easterly boundary line of 
Pier 30-32; thence northerly along said parallel line and its northerly 
prolongation, to a point of intersection with a line parallel with, and 
distant 10 feet northerly from, the existing northerly boundary of Pier 
30-32; thence westerly along last said parallel line to its 
intersection with the United States Government Pierhead line; thence 
northerly along said Pierhead line, to its intersection aforementioned 
northwesterly line of Bryant Street produced northeasterly; thence 
southwesterly along said northwesterly line of Bryant Street produced 
to the point of beginning.
    (c) Requirement That Area Be Improved.--The declaration of 
nonnavigability under subsection (a) applies only to those parts of the 
area described in subsection (b) that are or will be bulkheaded, 
filled, or otherwise occupied by permanent structures and does not 
affect the applicability of any Federal statute or regulation 
applicable to such parts the day before the date of enactment of this 
Act, including sections 9 and 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 
401 and 403; 30 Stat. 1151), commonly known as the Rivers and Harbors 
Appropriation Act of 1899, section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), and the National Environmental Policy Act 
of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (d) Expiration Date.--If, 20 years from the date of enactment of 
this Act, any area or part thereof described in subsection (b) is not 
bulkheaded or filled or occupied by permanent structures, including 
marina facilities, in accordance with the requirements set out in 
subsection (c), or if work in connection with any activity permitted in 
subsection (c) is not commenced within 5 years after issuance of such 
permits, then the declaration of nonnavigability for such area or part 
thereof shall expire.
SEC. 5053. SAN PABLO BAY, CALIFORNIA, WATERSHED AND SUISUN MARSH 
ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.
    (a) San Pablo Bay Watershed, California.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall complete work, as 
    expeditiously as possible, on the ongoing San Pablo Bay watershed, 
    California, study to determine the feasibility of opportunities for 
    restoring, preserving, and protecting the San Pablo Bay watershed.
        (2) Report.--Not later than March 31, 2008, the Secretary shall 
    submit to Congress a report on the results of the study.
    (b) Suisun Marsh, California.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
comprehensive study to determine the feasibility of opportunities for 
restoring, preserving, and protecting the Suisun Marsh, California.
    (c) San Pablo and Suisun Bay Marsh Watershed Critical Restoration 
Projects.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in critical 
    restoration projects that will produce, consistent with Federal 
    programs, projects, and activities, immediate and substantial 
    ecosystem restoration, preservation, and protection benefits in the 
    following sub-watersheds of the San Pablo and Suisun Bay Marsh 
    watersheds:
            (A) The tidal areas of the Petaluma River, Napa-Sonoma 
        Marsh.
            (B) The shoreline of West Contra Costa County.
            (C) Novato Creek.
            (D) Suisun Marsh.
            (E) Gallinas-Miller Creek.
        (2) Types of assistance.--Participation in critical restoration 
    projects under this subsection may include assistance for planning, 
    design, or construction.
    (d) Credit.--In accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), the Secretary shall credit toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of construction of a project under this 
section--
        (1) the value of any lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged 
    material disposal areas, or relocations provided by the non-Federal 
    interest for carrying out the project, regardless of the date of 
    acquisition;
        (2) funds received from the CALFED Bay-Delta program; and
        (3) the cost of the studies, design, and construction work 
    carried out by the non-Federal interest before the date of the 
    partnership agreement for the project.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.
SEC. 5054. ST. HELENA, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may construct a project for flood 
control and environmental restoration, St. Helena, California, 
substantially in accordance with the plan for the St. Helena 
comprehensive flood protection project dated 2006 and described in the 
addendum dated June 27, 2006, to the report prepared by the city of St. 
Helena entitled ``City of St. Helena Comprehensive Flood Protection 
Project, Final Environmental Impact Report'', and dated January 2004, 
if the Secretary determines that the plans and designs for the project 
are feasible.
    (b) Cost.--The total cost of the project to be constructed pursuant 
to subsection (a) shall be $30,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $19,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $10,500,000.
    (c) Reimbursement.--The non-Federal interest shall be reimbursed 
for any work performed by the non-Federal interest for the project 
described in subsection (a) that is in excess of the required non-
Federal contribution toward the total cost of the project, if the 
Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.
SEC. 5055. UPPER CALAVERAS RIVER, STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.
    (a) Reevaluation.--The Secretary shall reevaluate the feasibility 
of the Lower Mosher Slough element and the levee extensions on the 
Upper Calaveras River element of the project for flood control, 
Stockton Metropolitan Area, California, carried out under section 
211(f)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3683), to determine the eligibility of such elements for reimbursement 
under section 211 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 701b-13).
    (b) Special Rules for Reevaluation.--In conducting the reevaluation 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall not reject a feasibility 
determination based on one or more of the policies of the Corps of 
Engineers concerning the frequency of flooding, the drainage area, and 
the amount of runoff.
    (c) Reimbursement.--If the Secretary determines that the elements 
referred to subsection (a) are feasible, the Secretary shall reimburse, 
subject to appropriations, the non-Federal interest under section 211 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 for the Federal share of 
the cost of such elements.
SEC. 5056. RIO GRANDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, COLORADO, NEW 
MEXICO, AND TEXAS.
    (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
        (1) Rio grande compact.--The term ``Rio Grande Compact'' means 
    the compact approved by Congress under the Act of May 31, 1939 (53 
    Stat. 785), and ratified by the States.
        (2) Rio grande basin.--The term ``Rio Grande Basin'' means the 
    Rio Grande (including all tributaries and their headwaters) 
    located--
            (A) in the State of Colorado, from the Rio Grande 
        Reservoir, near Creede, Colorado, to the New Mexico State 
        border;
            (B) in the State of New Mexico, from the Colorado State 
        border downstream to the Texas State border; and
            (C) in the State of Texas, from the New Mexico State border 
        to the southern terminus of the Rio Grande at the Gulf of 
        Mexico.
        (3) States.--The term ``States'' means the States of Colorado, 
    New Mexico, and Texas.
    (b) Program Authority.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out, in the Rio 
    Grande Basin--
            (A) a program for the planning, construction, and 
        evaluation of measures for fish and wildlife habitat 
        rehabilitation and enhancement; and
            (B) implementation of a long-term monitoring, computerized 
        data inventory and analysis, applied research, and adaptive 
        management program.
        (2) Reports.--Not later than December 31, 2008, and not later 
    than December 31 of every sixth year thereafter, the Secretary, in 
    consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and the States, 
    shall submit to Congress a report that--
            (A) contains an evaluation of the programs described in 
        paragraph (1);
            (B) describes the accomplishments of each program;
            (C) provides updates of a systemic habitat needs 
        assessment; and
            (D) identifies any needed adjustments in the authorization 
        of the programs.
    (c) State and Local Consultation and Cooperative Effort.--For the 
purpose of ensuring the coordinated planning and implementation of the 
programs described in subsection (b), the Secretary shall--
        (1) consult with the States, and other appropriate entities in 
    the States, the rights and interests of which might be affected by 
    specific program activities; and
        (2) enter into an interagency agreement with the Secretary of 
    the Interior to provide for the direct participation of, and 
    transfer of funds to, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service 
    and any other agency or bureau of the Department of the Interior 
    for the planning, design, implementation, and evaluation of those 
    programs.
    (d) Operation and Maintenance.--The costs of operation and 
maintenance of a project located on Federal land, or land owned or 
operated by a State or local government, shall be borne by the Federal, 
State, or local agency that has jurisdiction over fish and wildlife 
activities on the land.
    (e) Effect on Other Law.--
        (1) Water law.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
    preempt any State water law.
        (2) Compacts and decrees.--In carrying out this section, the 
    Secretary shall comply with the Rio Grande Compact, and any 
    applicable court decrees or Federal and State laws, affecting water 
    or water rights in the Rio Grande Basin.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $15,000,000 for 
each of fiscal years 2008 through 2011.
SEC. 5057. CHARLES HERVEY TOWNSHEND BREAKWATER, NEW HAVEN HARBOR, 
CONNECTICUT.
    The western breakwater for the project for navigation, New Haven 
Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the first section of the Act of 
September 19, 1890 (26 Stat. 428), shall be known and designated as the 
``Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater''.
SEC. 5058. STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the ecosystem 
restoration, navigation, flood damage reduction, and recreation 
components of the Mill River and Long Island Sound revitalization 
project, Stamford, Connecticut.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5059. DELMARVA CONSERVATION CORRIDOR, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, AND 
VIRGINIA.
    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide technical assistance to 
the Secretary of Agriculture for use in carrying out the Conservation 
Corridor Demonstration Program established under subtitle G of title II 
of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (16 U.S.C. 3801 
note; 116 Stat. 275).
    (b) Coordination and Integration.--In carrying out water resources 
projects in the States on the Delmarva Peninsula, the Secretary shall 
coordinate and integrate those projects, to the maximum extent 
practicable, with any activities carried out to implement a 
conservation corridor plan approved by the Secretary of Agriculture 
under section 2602 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 
2002 (16 U.S.C. 3801 note; 116 Stat. 275).
SEC. 5060. ANACOSTIA RIVER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND MARYLAND.
    (a) Comprehensive Action Plan.--Not later than one year after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in coordination with the 
Mayor of the District of Columbia, the Governor of Maryland, the county 
executives of Montgomery County and Prince George's County, Maryland, 
and other interested entities, shall develop and make available to the 
public a 10-year comprehensive action plan to provide for the 
restoration and protection of the ecological integrity of the Anacostia 
River and its tributaries.
    (b) Public Availability.--On completion of the comprehensive action 
plan under subsection (a), the Secretary shall make the plan available 
to the public, including on the Internet.
SEC. 5061. EAST CENTRAL AND NORTHEAST FLORIDA.
    (a) East Central and Northeast Florida Region Defined.--In this 
section, the term ``East Central and Northeast Florida Region'' means 
Flagler County, St. Johns County, Putman County (east of the St. Johns 
River), Seminole County, Volusia County, the towns of Winter Park, 
Maitland, and Palatka, Florida.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the East Central and Northeast Florida Region.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in the East Central and Northeast Florida Region, including 
projects for wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply 
and related facilities, environmental restoration, and surface water 
resource protection and development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
    with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and construction 
    of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
    entered into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        or resource protection and development plan, including 
        appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
        under this section--
                (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
            reimbursements of project costs.
            (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
        (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
        of the project the cost of design work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.
            (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
        of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is the 
        subject of an agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
        interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred 
        in providing the non-Federal share.
            (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
        non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs (including all reasonable costs associated with 
        obtaining permits necessary for the construction, operation, 
        and maintenance of the project on publicly owned or controlled 
        land), but the credit may not exceed 25 percent of total 
        project costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.
SEC. 5062. FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS.
    Section 109 of the Miscellaneous Appropriations Act, 2001 (enacted 
into law by Public Law 106-554) (114 Stat. 2763A-222) is amended--
        (1) by adding at the end of subsection (e)(2) the following:
            ``(C) Credit for work prior to execution of the partnership 
        agreement.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project--
                ``(i) in accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
            Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), the cost of 
            construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
            for the project before the date of the partnership 
            agreement for the project; and
                ``(ii) the cost of land acquisition carried out by the 
            non-Federal interest for projects to be carried out under 
            this section.''; and
        (2) in subsection (f) by striking ``$100,000,000'' and 
    inserting ``$100,000,000, of which not more than $15,000,000 may be 
    used to provide planning, design, and construction assistance to 
    the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority for a water treatment plant, 
    Florida City, Florida''.
SEC. 5063. LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA.
    The Secretary may carry out necessary repairs for the Lake Worth 
bulkhead replacement project, West Palm Beach, Florida, at an estimated 
total cost of $9,000,000.
SEC. 5064. BIG CREEK, GEORGIA, WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AND RESTORATION 
PROGRAM.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may cooperate with, by providing 
technical, planning, and construction assistance to, the city of 
Roswell, Georgia, as the non-Federal interest and coordinator with 
other local governments in the Big Creek watershed, Georgia, to assess 
the quality and quantity of water resources, conduct comprehensive 
watershed management planning, develop and implement water efficiency 
technologies and programs, and plan, design, and construct water 
resource facilities to restore the watershed.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary $5,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5065. METROPOLITAN NORTH GEORGIA WATER PLANNING DISTRICT.
    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in north Georgia, including projects for wastewater treatment 
and related facilities, elimination or control of combined sewer 
overflows, water supply and related facilities, environmental 
restoration, and surface water resource protection and development.
    (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (d) Partnership Agreements.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
    with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and construction 
    of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
    entered into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        or resource protection and development plan, including 
        appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
        under this section--
                (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
            reimbursements of project costs.
            (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
        (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
        of a project under this section, in an amount not to exceed 6 
        percent of the total construction costs of the project, the 
        cost of design work carried out by the non-Federal interest for 
        the project before the date of the partnership agreement for 
        the project.
            (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
        of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is the 
        subject of an agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
        interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred 
        in providing the non-Federal share.
            (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
        non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs (including all reasonable costs associated with 
        obtaining permits necessary for the construction, operation, 
        and maintenance of the project on publicly owned or controlled 
        land), but the credit may not exceed 25 percent of total 
        project costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000.
SEC. 5066. SAVANNAH, GEORGIA.
    (a) In General.--After completion of a Savannah Riverfront plan, 
the Secretary may participate in the ecosystem restoration, recreation, 
navigation, and flood damage reduction components of the plan.
    (b) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall coordinate with appropriate representatives in the vicinity of 
Savannah, Georgia, including the Georgia Ports Authority, the city of 
Savannah, and Camden County.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5067. IDAHO, MONTANA, RURAL NEVADA, NEW MEXICO, RURAL UTAH, AND 
WYOMING.
    Section 595 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 383; 117 Stat. 139; 117 Stat. 142; 117 Stat. 1836; 118 Stat. 440) 
is amended--
        (1) in the section heading by striking ``and rural utah'' and 
    inserting ``rural utah, and wyoming'';
        (2) in subsections (b) and (c) by striking ``and rural Utah'' 
    each place it appears and inserting ``rural Utah, and Wyoming''; 
    and
        (3) by striking subsection (h) and inserting the following:
    ``(h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section for the period beginning with 
fiscal year 2001 $150,000,000 for rural Nevada, $25,000,000 for each of 
Montana and New Mexico, $55,000,000 for Idaho, $50,000,000 for rural 
Utah, and $30,000,000 for Wyoming. Such sums shall remain available 
until expended.''.
SEC. 5068. RILEY CREEK RECREATION AREA, IDAHO.
    The Secretary is authorized to carry out the Riley Creek Recreation 
Area Operation Plan of the Albeni Falls Management Plan, dated October 
2001, for the Riley Creek Recreation Area, Albeni Falls Dam, Bonner 
County, Idaho.
SEC. 5069. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for a 
project to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood inundation 
areas along the Little Calumet River, Chicago, Illinois.
    (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall include 
hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall accurately show the 
flood inundation of each property by flood risk in the floodplain. The 
maps shall be produced in a high resolution format and shall be made 
available to all flood prone areas along the Little Calumet River, 
Chicago, Illinois, in an electronic format.
    (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-Federal 
interests for the project shall work with the Administrator of the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency to ensure the validity of the maps 
developed under the project for flood insurance purposes.
    (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the 
Secretary may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements with the 
non-Federal interests or provide reimbursements of project costs.
    (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
shall be 50 percent.
    (f) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to modify the prioritization of map updates or the 
substantive requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
flood map modernization program authorized by section 1360 of the 
National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4101).
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,000,000.
SEC. 5070. RECONSTRUCTION OF ILLINOIS AND MISSOURI FLOOD PROTECTION 
PROJECTS.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the 
reconstruction of an eligible flood control project if the Secretary 
determines that such reconstruction is not required as a result of 
improper operation and maintenance of the project by the non-Federal 
interest.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the costs for the 
reconstruction of a flood control project authorized by this section 
shall be the same non-Federal share that was applicable to construction 
of the project. The non-Federal interest shall be responsible for 
operation and maintenance and repair of a project for which 
reconstruction is undertaken under this section.
    (c) Reconstruction Defined.--In this section, the term 
``reconstruction'', as used with respect to a project, means addressing 
major project deficiencies caused by long-term degradation of the 
foundation, construction materials, or engineering systems or 
components of the project, the results of which render the project at 
risk of not performing in compliance with its authorized project 
purposes. In addressing such deficiencies, the Secretary may 
incorporate current design standards and efficiency improvements, 
including the replacement of obsolete mechanical and electrical 
components at pumping stations, if such incorporation does not 
significantly change the scope, function, and purpose of the project as 
authorized.
    (d) Eligible Projects.--The following flood control projects are 
eligible for reconstruction under this section:
        (1) Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, Illinois.
        (2) Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District, Illinois.
        (3) Prairie Du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, including Fish 
    Lake Drainage and Levee District, Illinois.
        (4) Cairo, Illinois Mainline Levee, Cairo, Illinois.
        (5) Goose Pond Pump Station, Cairo, Illinois.
        (6) Cottonwood Slough Pump Station, Alexander County, Illinois.
        (7) 10th and 28th Street Pump Stations, Cairo, Illinois.
        (8) Flood control levee projects in Brookport, Shawneetown, Old 
    Shawneetown, Golconda, Rosiclare, Harrisburg, and Reevesville, 
    Illinois.
        (9) City of St. Louis, Missouri.
        (10) Missouri River Levee Drainage District, Missouri.
    (e) Justification.--The reconstruction of a project authorized by 
this section shall not be considered a separable element of the 
project.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $50,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5071. ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION.
    (a) Extension of Authorization.--Section 519(c)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2654) is amended by 
striking ``2004'' and inserting ``2010''.
    (b) Maximum Federal Share.--Section 519(c)(3) of such Act (114 
Stat. 2654) is amended by striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting 
``$20,000,000''.
    (c) In-Kind Services.--Section 519(g)(3) of such Act (114 Stat. 
2655) is amended by inserting before the period at the end of the first 
sentence ``if such services are provided not more than 5 years before 
the date of initiation of the project or activity''.
    (d) Monitoring.--Section 519 of such Act (114 Stat. 2654) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall develop an Illinois River 
basin monitoring program to support the plan developed under subsection 
(b). Data collected under the monitoring program shall incorporate data 
provided by the State of Illinois and shall be publicly accessible 
through electronic means, including on the Internet.''.
SEC. 5072. PROMONTORY POINT THIRD-PARTY REVIEW, CHICAGO SHORELINE, 
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.
    (a) Review.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a third-party 
    review of the Promontory Point feature of the project for storm 
    damage reduction and shoreline erosion protection, Lake Michigan, 
    Illinois, from Wilmette, Illinois, to the Illinois-Indiana State 
    line, authorized by section 101(a)(12) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3664), at a cost not to exceed 
    $450,000.
        (2) Joint review.--The Buffalo and Seattle Districts of the 
    Corps of Engineers shall jointly conduct the review under paragraph 
    (1).
        (3) Standards.--The review under paragraph (1) shall be based 
    on the standards under part 68 of title 36, Code of Federal 
    Regulations (or any successor regulation).
    (b) Contributions.--The Secretary may accept funds from a State or 
political subdivision of a State to conduct the review under paragraph 
(1).
    (c) Treatment.--The review under paragraph (1) shall not be 
considered to be an element of the project referred to in paragraph 
(1).
    (d) Effect of Section.--Nothing in this section shall be construed 
to affect the authorization for the project referred to in paragraph 
(1).
SEC. 5073. KASKASKIA RIVER BASIN, ILLINOIS, RESTORATION.
    (a) Kaskaskia River Basin Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Kaskaskia River Basin'' means the Kaskaskia River, Illinois, its 
backwaters, its side channels, and all tributaries, including their 
watersheds, draining into the Kaskaskia River.
    (b) Comprehensive Plan.--
        (1) Development.--The Secretary shall develop, as expeditiously 
    as practicable, a comprehensive plan for the purpose of restoring, 
    preserving, and protecting the Kaskaskia River Basin.
        (2) Technologies and innovative approaches.--The comprehensive 
    plan shall provide for the development of new technologies and 
    innovative approaches--
            (A) to enhance the Kaskaskia River as a transportation 
        corridor;
            (B) to improve water quality within the entire Kaskaskia 
        River Basin;
            (C) to restore, enhance, and preserve habitat for plants 
        and wildlife;
            (D) to ensure aquatic integrity of side channels and 
        backwaters and their connectivity with the mainstem river;
            (E) to increase economic opportunity for agriculture and 
        business communities; and
            (F) to reduce the impacts of flooding to communities and 
        landowners.
        (3) Specific components.--The comprehensive plan shall include 
    such features as are necessary to provide for--
            (A) the development and implementation of a program for 
        sediment removal technology, sediment characterization, 
        sediment transport, and beneficial uses of sediment;
            (B) the development and implementation of a program for the 
        planning, conservation, evaluation, and construction of 
        measures for fish and wildlife habitat conservation and 
        rehabilitation, and stabilization and enhancement of land and 
        water resources in the Kaskaskia River Basin;
            (C) the development and implementation of a long-term 
        resource monitoring program for the Basin;
            (D) a conveyance study of the Kaskaskia River floodplain 
        from Vandalia, Illinois, to Carlyle Lake to determine the 
        impacts of existing and future waterfowl improvements on flood 
        stages, including detailed surveys and mapping information to 
        ensure proper hydraulic and hydrological analysis;
            (E) the development and implementation of a computerized 
        inventory and analysis system for the Basin;
            (F) the development and implementation of a systemic plan 
        for the Basin to reduce flood impacts by means of ecosystem 
        restoration projects; and
            (G) the study and design of necessary measures to reduce 
        ongoing headcutting and restore the aquatic environment of the 
        Basin that has been degraded by the headcutting that has 
        occurred above the existing grade control structure.
        (4) Consultation.--The comprehensive plan shall be developed by 
    the Secretary in consultation with appropriate Federal agencies, 
    the State of Illinois, and the Kaskaskia River Watershed 
    Association.
        (5) Report to congress.--Not later than 2 years after the date 
    of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
    Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
    of the Senate a report containing the comprehensive plan.
        (6) Additional studies and analyses.--After submission of a 
    report under paragraph (5), the Secretary shall conduct studies and 
    analyses of projects related to the comprehensive plan that are 
    appropriate and consistent with this subsection.
    (c) General Provisions.--
        (1) Water quality.--In carrying out activities under this 
    section, the Secretary's recommendations shall be consistent with 
    applicable State water quality standards.
        (2) Public participation.--In developing the comprehensive plan 
    under subsection (b), the Secretary shall implement procedures to 
    facilitate public participation, including providing advance notice 
    of meetings, providing adequate opportunity for public input and 
    comment, maintaining appropriate records, and making a record of 
    the proceedings of meetings available for public inspection.
    (d) Critical Projects and Initiatives.--If the Secretary, in 
cooperation with appropriate Federal agencies and the State of 
Illinois, determines that a project or initiative for the Kaskaskia 
River Basin will produce independent, immediate, and substantial 
benefits, the Secretary may proceed with the implementation of the 
project.
    (e) Coordination.--The Secretary shall integrate activities carried 
out under this section with ongoing Federal and State programs, 
projects, and activities, including the following:
        (1) Farm programs of the Department of Agriculture.
        (2) Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (State of 
    Illinois) and Conservation 2000 Ecosystem Program of the Illinois 
    department of natural resources.
        (3) Conservation 2000 Conservation Practices Program and the 
    Livestock Management Facilities Act administered by the Illinois 
    department of agriculture.
        (4) National Buffer Initiative of the Natural Resources 
    Conservation Service.
        (5) Nonpoint source grant program administered by the Illinois 
    environmental protection agency.
        (6) Other programs that may be developed by the State of 
    Illinois or the Federal Government, or that are carried out by 
    nonprofit organizations, to carry out the objectives of the 
    Kaskaskia River Basin Comprehensive Plan.
    (f) In-Kind Services.--The Secretary may credit the cost of in-kind 
services provided by the non-Federal interest for an activity carried 
out under this section toward not more than 80 percent of the non-
Federal share of the cost of the activity. In-kind services shall 
include all State funds expended on programs that accomplish the goals 
of this section, as determined by the Secretary. The programs may 
include the Kaskaskia River Conservation Reserve Program, the Illinois 
Conservation 2000 Program, the Open Lands Trust Fund, and other 
appropriate programs carried out in the Kaskaskia River Basin.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $20,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5074. SOUTHWEST ILLINOIS.
    (a) Southwest Illinois Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Southwest Illinois'' means the counties of Madison, St. Clair, 
Monroe, Randolph, Perry, Franklin, Jackson, Union, Alexander, Pulaski, 
and Williamson, Illinois.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
Southwest Illinois.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in Southwest Illinois, including projects for wastewater 
treatment and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
and surface water resource protection and development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
    with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and construction 
    of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
    entered into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        or resource protection and development plan, including 
        appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
        under this section--
                (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
            reimbursements of project costs.
            (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
        (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
        of the project the cost of design work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.
            (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
        of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of an 
        agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in providing 
        the non-Federal share.
            (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
        non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs (including all reasonable costs associated with 
        obtaining permits necessary for the construction, operation, 
        and maintenance of the project on publicly owned or controlled 
        land), but the credit may not exceed 25 percent of total 
        project costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.
SEC. 5075. CALUMET REGION, INDIANA.
    Section 219(f)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 335; 117 Stat. 1843) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``$30,000,000'' and inserting the following:
            ``(A) In general.--$100,000,000'';
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance 
        with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
        1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
        project the cost of planning and design work carried out by the 
        non-Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.''; and
        (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph (A) 
    (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with subparagraph 
    (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).
SEC. 5076. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, MISSOURI RIVER, IOWA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for a 
project to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood inundation 
areas in the State of Iowa, along the Missouri River.
    (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall include 
hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall accurately portray the 
flood hazard areas in the floodplain. The maps shall be produced in a 
high resolution format and shall be made available to the State of Iowa 
in an electronic format.
    (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-Federal 
interests for the project shall work with the Administrator of the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency to ensure the validity of the maps 
developed under the project for flood insurance purposes.
    (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the 
Secretary may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements with the 
non-Federal interests or provide reimbursements of project costs.
    (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
shall be 50 percent.
    (f) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to modify the prioritization of map updates or the 
substantive requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
flood map modernization program authorized by section 1360 of the 
National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4101).
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000.
SEC. 5077. PADUCAH, KENTUCKY.
    The Secretary shall complete a feasibility report for 
rehabilitation of the project for flood damage reduction, Paducah, 
Kentucky, authorized by section 4 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 
1938 (52 Stat. 1217), and, if the Secretary determines that the project 
is feasible, the Secretary may carry out the project at a total cost of 
$3,000,000.
SEC. 5078. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY.
    Section 531 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3773; 113 Stat. 348; 117 Stat. 142) is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``(i) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.''.
SEC. 5079. WINCHESTER, KENTUCKY.
    Section 219(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4835; 114 Stat. 2763A-219) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
        ``(41) Winchester, kentucky.--Wastewater infrastructure, 
    Winchester, Kentucky.''.
SEC. 5080. BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA.
    Section 219(f)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended by striking 
``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$35,000,000''.
SEC. 5081. CALCASIEU SHIP CHANNEL, LOUISIANA.
    The Secretary shall expedite completion of a dredged material 
management plan for the Calcasieu Ship Channel, Louisiana, and may take 
interim measures to increase the capacity of existing disposal areas, 
or to construct new confined or beneficial use disposal areas, for the 
channel.
SEC. 5082. EAST ATCHAFALAYA BASIN AND AMITE RIVER BASIN REGION, 
LOUISIANA.
    (a) East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin Region Defined.--
In this section, the term ``East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River 
Basin Region'' means the following parishes and municipalities in the 
State of Louisiana: Ascension, East Baton Rouge, East Feliciana, 
Iberville, Livingston, Pointe Coupee, St. Helena, West Baton Rouge, and 
West Feliciana.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin Region.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in the East Atchafalaya Basin and Amite River Basin Region, 
including projects for wastewater treatment and related facilities, 
water supply and related facilities, environmental restoration, and 
surface water resource protection and development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
    with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and construction 
    of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement of a project 
    entered into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        or resource protection and development plan, including 
        appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
        under this section--
                (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
            reimbursements of project costs.
            (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
        (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
        of the project the cost of design work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.
            (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
        of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of an 
        agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in providing 
        the non-Federal share.
            (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
        non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs (including all reasonable costs associated with 
        obtaining permits necessary for the construction, operation, 
        and maintenance of the project on publicly owned or controlled 
        land), but the credit may not exceed 25 percent of total 
        project costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.
SEC. 5083. INNER HARBOR NAVIGATION CANAL LOCK PROJECT, LOUISIANA.
    Not later than July 1, 2008, the Secretary shall--
        (1) issue a final environmental impact statement relating to 
    the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock project, Louisiana; and
        (2) develop and maintain a transportation mitigation program 
    relating to that project in coordination with--
            (A) St. Bernard Parish;
            (B) Orleans Parish;
            (C) the Old Arabi Neighborhood Association; and
            (D) other interested parties.
SEC. 5084. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LOUISIANA.
    For purposes of carrying out section 121 of the Federal Water 
Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273), the Lake Pontchartrain, 
Louisiana, basin stakeholders conference convened by the Environmental 
Protection Agency, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and 
United States Geological Survey on February 25, 2002, shall be treated 
as being a management conference convened under section 320 of such Act 
(33 U.S.C. 1330).
SEC. 5085. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA REGION, LOUISIANA.
    (a) Definition of Southeast Louisiana Region.--In this section, the 
term ``Southeast Louisiana Region'' means any of the following parishes 
and municipalities in the State of Louisiana:
        (1) Orleans.
        (2) Jefferson.
        (3) St. Tammany.
        (4) Tangipahoa.
        (5) St. Bernard.
        (6) St. Charles.
        (7) St. John.
        (8) Plaquemines.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the Southeast Louisiana Region.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in the Southeast Louisiana Region, including projects for 
wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply and related 
facilities, environmental restoration, and surface water resource 
protection and development (including projects to improve water quality 
in the Lake Pontchartrain basin).
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
    with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and construction 
    of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
    entered into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        or resource protection and development plan, including 
        appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
        under this section--
                (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
            reimbursements of project costs.
            (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
        (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
        of the project the cost of design work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.
            (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
        of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is the 
        subject of an agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
        interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred 
        in providing the non-Federal share.
            (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
        non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs (including all reasonable costs associated with 
        obtaining permits necessary for the construction, operation, 
        and maintenance of the project on publicly owned or controlled 
        land), but the credit may not exceed 25 percent of total 
        project costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of 
amounts made available to carry out this section may be used by the 
Corps of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this 
section at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $17,000,000.
SEC. 5086. WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LOUISIANA.
    (a) Modification of Study.--The study for the project for 
waterfront and riverine preservation, restoration, and enhancement, 
Mississippi River, West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, being carried 
out under Committee Resolution 2570 of the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives adopted July 23, 
1998, is modified to add West Feliciana Parish and East Baton Rouge 
Parish to the geographic scope of the study.
    (b) Construction.--The Secretary may, upon completion of the study, 
participate in the ecosystem restoration, navigation, flood damage 
reduction, and recreation components of the project.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of design work 
carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date 
of the partnership agreement for the project.
    (d) Expedited Consideration.--Section 517(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 345) is amended to read as follows:
        ``(5) Mississippi River, West Baton Rouge, West Feliciana, and 
    East Baton Rouge Parishes, Louisiana, project for waterfront and 
    riverine preservation, restoration, and enhancement 
    modifications.''.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.
SEC. 5087. CHARLESTOWN, MARYLAND.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a project for 
nonstructural flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration at 
Charlestown, Maryland.
    (b) Land Acquisition.--The flood damage reduction component of the 
project may include the acquisition of private property from willing 
sellers.
    (c) Justification.--Any nonstructural flood damage reduction 
project to be carried out under this section that will result in the 
conversion of property to use for ecosystem restoration and wildlife 
habitat shall be justified based on national ecosystem restoration 
benefits.
    (d) Use of Acquired Property.--Property acquired under this section 
shall be maintained in public ownership for ecosystem restoration and 
wildlife habitat.
    (e) Ability to Pay.--In determining the appropriate non-Federal 
cost share for the project, the Secretary shall determine the ability 
of Cecil County, Maryland, to participate as a cost-sharing non-Federal 
interest in accordance with section 103(m) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)).
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $2,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5088. ST. MARY'S RIVER, MARYLAND.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out the project for 
shoreline protection, St. Mary's River, Maryland, under section 3 of 
the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal participation in the cost 
of protecting the shores of publicly owned property'', approved August 
13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g).
    (b) Use of Funds.--In carrying out the project under subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall use funds made available for such project 
under Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 
109-103).
SEC. 5089. MASSACHUSETTS DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES.
    The Secretary may cooperate with Massachusetts in the management 
and long-term monitoring of aquatic dredged material disposal sites 
within the State and is authorized to accept funds from the State to 
carry out such activities.
SEC. 5090. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MICHIGAN.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study of shore damage in the vicinity 
of the project for navigation, Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, 
Michigan, authorized by section 101 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 
1962 (76 Stat. 1176) and reauthorized by section 363 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3730), to determine if the 
damage is the result of a Federal navigation project, and, if the 
Secretary determines that the damage is the result of a Federal 
navigation project, the Secretary shall carry out a project to mitigate 
the damage under section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 
U.S.C. 426i).
SEC. 5091. CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for emergency 
streambank protection along the Red Lake River in Crookston, Minnesota, 
and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, the 
Secretary may carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r); except that the maximum amount of 
Federal funds that may be expended for the project shall be $6,500,000.
SEC. 5092. GARRISON AND KATHIO TOWNSHIP, MINNESOTA.
    (a) Project Description.--Section 219(f)(61) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (114 Stat. 2763A-221) is amended--
        (1) in the paragraph heading by striking ``and kathio 
    township'' and inserting ``, crow wing county, mille lacs county, 
    mille lacs indian reservation, and kathio township'';
        (2) by striking ``$11,000,000'' and inserting ``$17,000,000'';
        (3) by inserting ``, Crow Wing County, Mille Lacs County, Mille 
    Lacs Indian Reservation established by the treaty of February 22, 
    1855 (10 Stat. 1165),'' after ``Garrison''; and
        (4) by adding at the end the following: ``Such assistance shall 
    be provided directly to the Garrison-Kathio-West Mille Lacs Lake 
    Sanitary District, Minnesota, except for assistance provided 
    directly to the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe at the discretion of the 
    Secretary.''.
    (b) Procedures.--In carrying out the project authorized by such 
section 219(f)(61), the Secretary may use the cost sharing and 
contracting procedures available to the Secretary under section 569 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368).
SEC. 5093. ITASCA COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
    The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood damage reduction, 
Trout Lake and Canisteo Pit, Itasca County, Minnesota, without regard 
to normal policy considerations.
SEC. 5094. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA.
    (a) Conveyance.--The Secretary shall convey to the city of 
Minneapolis by quitclaim deed and without consideration all right, 
title, and interest of the United States to the property known as the 
War Department (Fort Snelling Interceptor) Tunnel in Minneapolis, 
Minnesota.
    (b) Applicability of Property Screening Provisions.--Section 2696 
of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply to the conveyance 
under this section.
SEC. 5095. NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA.
    (a) In General.--Section 569 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 368) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``Benton, Sherburne,'' and 
    inserting ``Beltrami, Hubbard, Wadena,'';
        (2) by striking the last sentence of subsection (e)(3)(B);
        (3) by striking subsection (g) and inserting the following:
    ``(g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.'';
        (4) in subsection (h) by striking ``$40,000,000'' and inserting 
    ``$54,000,000''; and
        (5) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.''.
    (b) Biwabik, Minnesota.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-
Federal interest for the project for environmental infrastructure, 
Biwabik, Minnesota, carried out under section 569 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368), for planning, 
design, and construction costs that were incurred by the non-Federal 
interest with respect to the project before the date of the partnership 
agreement for the project and that were in excess of the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project if the Secretary determines that the 
costs are appropriate.
SEC. 5096. WILD RICE RIVER, MINNESOTA.
    The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the general 
reevaluation report, authorized by section 438 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2640), for the project for flood 
protection, Wild Rice River, Minnesota, authorized by section 201 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1825), to develop alternatives 
to the Twin Valley Lake feature, and upon the completion of such 
report, shall construct the project at a total cost of $20,000,000.
SEC. 5097. MISSISSIPPI.
    Section 592(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 380; 117 Stat. 1837) is amended by striking ``$100,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$110,000,000''.
SEC. 5098. HARRISON, HANCOCK, AND JACKSON COUNTIES, MISSISSIPPI.
    In carrying out projects for the protection, restoration, and 
creation of aquatic and ecologically related habitats located in 
Harrison, Hancock, and Jackson Counties, Mississippi, under section 204 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326), the 
Secretary shall accept any portion of the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the projects in the form of in-kind services and materials.
SEC. 5099. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSOURI AND ILLINOIS.
    As a part of the operation and maintenance of the project for the 
Mississippi River (Regulating Works), between the Ohio and Missouri 
Rivers, Missouri and Illinois, authorized by the first section of an 
Act entitled ``Making appropriations for the construction, repair, and 
preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for 
other purposes'', approved June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 630), the Secretary 
may carry out activities necessary to restore and protect fish and 
wildlife habitat in the middle Mississippi River system. Such 
activities may include modification of navigation training structures, 
modification and creation of side channels, modification and creation 
of islands, and studies and analysis necessary to apply adaptive 
management principles in design of future work.
SEC. 5100. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.
    Section 219(f)(32) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 337) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``a project'' and inserting ``projects'';
        (2) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting ``$35,000,000''; 
    and
        (3) by inserting ``and St. Louis County'' before ``, 
    Missouri''.
SEC. 5101. ST. LOUIS REGIONAL GREENWAYS, ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the ecosystem 
restoration, recreation, and flood damage reduction components of the 
St. Louis Regional Greenways Proposal of the Metropolitan Park and 
Recreation District, St. Louis, Missouri, dated March 31, 2004.
    (b) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall coordinate with appropriate representatives in the vicinity of 
St. Louis, Missouri, including the Metropolitan Park and Recreation 
District, the city of St. Louis, St. Louis County, and St. Charles 
County.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5102. MISSOULA, MONTANA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the ecosystem 
restoration, flood damage reduction, and recreation components of the 
Clark Fork River Revitalization Project, Missoula, Montana.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5103. ST. MARY PROJECT, GLACIER COUNTY, MONTANA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with the Bureau of 
Reclamation, shall conduct all necessary studies, develop an emergency 
response plan, provide technical and planning and design assistance, 
and rehabilitate and construct the St. Mary Diversion and Conveyance 
Works project located within the exterior boundaries of the Blackfeet 
Reservation in the State of Montana, at a total cost of $153,000,000.
    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the total cost of the 
project under this section shall be 75 percent.
    (c) Participation by Blackfeet Tribe and Fort Belknap Indian 
Community.--
        (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), no 
    construction shall be carried out under this section until the 
    earlier of--
            (A) the date on which Congress approves the reserved water 
        rights settlements of the Blackfeet Tribe and the Fort Belknap 
        Indian Community; and
            (B) January 1, 2011.
        (2) Exception.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to 
    construction relating to--
            (A) standard operation and maintenance; or
            (B) emergency repairs to ensure water transportation or the 
        protection of life and property.
        (3) Requirement.--The Blackfeet Tribe shall be a participant in 
    all phases of the project authorized by this section.
SEC. 5104. LOWER PLATTE RIVER WATERSHED RESTORATION, NEBRASKA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may cooperate with and provide 
assistance to the Lower Platte River natural resources districts in the 
State of Nebraska to serve as non-Federal interests with respect to--
        (1) conducting comprehensive watershed planning in the natural 
    resource districts;
        (2) assessing water resources in the natural resource 
    districts; and
        (3) providing project feasibility planning, design, and 
    construction assistance for water resource and watershed management 
    in the natural resource districts, including projects for 
    environmental restoration and flood damage reduction.
    (b) Funding.--
        (1) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of carrying 
    out an activity described in subsection (a)(1) shall be 75 percent.
        (2) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
    carrying out an activity described in subsection (a) may be 
    provided in cash or in kind.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $12,000,000.
SEC. 5105. HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS AREA, NEW JERSEY.
    Section 324 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4849; 110 Stat. 3779) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a)--
            (A) by striking ``design'' and inserting ``planning, 
        design,''; and
            (B) by striking ``Hackensack Meadowlands Development'' and 
        all that follows through ``Plan for'' and inserting ``New 
        Jersey Meadowlands Commission for the development of an 
        environmental improvement program for'';
        (2) in subsection (b)--
            (A) in the subsection heading by striking ``Required'';
            (B) by striking ``shall'' and inserting ``may'';
            (C) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following:
        ``(1) Restoration and acquisitions of significant wetlands and 
    aquatic habitat that contribute to the Meadowlands ecosystem.'';
            (D) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``and aquatic habitat'' 
        before the period at the end; and
            (E) by striking paragraph (7) and inserting the following:
        ``(7) Research, development, and implementation for a water 
    quality improvement program, including restoration of hydrology and 
    tidal flows and remediation of hot spots and other sources of 
    contaminants that degrade existing or planned sites.'';
        (3) in subsection (c)--
            (A) by striking ``non-Federal sponsor'' and inserting 
        ``non-Federal interest''; and
            (B) by inserting before the last sentence the following: 
        ``The non-Federal interest may also provide in-kind services 
        not to exceed the non-Federal share of the total project 
        cost.'';
        (4) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e);
        (5) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of a project to be carried out 
under the program developed under subsection (a) the cost of design 
work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project.''; and
        (6) in subsection (e) (as redesignated by paragraph (4) of this 
    subsection) by striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting 
    ``$20,000,000''.
SEC. 5106. ATLANTIC COAST OF NEW YORK.
    (a) Development of Program.--Section 404(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4863) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``processes'' and inserting ``and related 
    environmental processes'';
        (2) by inserting after ``Atlantic Coast'' the following: ``(and 
    associated back bays)'';
        (3) by inserting after ``actions'' the following: ``, 
    environmental restoration or conservation measures for coastal and 
    back bays,''; and
        (4) by adding at the end the following: ``The plan for 
    collecting data and monitoring information included in such annual 
    report shall be coordinated with and agreed to by appropriate 
    agencies of the State of New York.''.
    (b) Annual Reports.--Section 404(b) of such Act is amended--
        (1) by striking ``Initial Plan.--Not later than 12 months after 
    the date of the enactment of this Act, the'' and inserting ``Annual 
    Reports.--The'';
        (2) by striking ``initial plan for data collection and 
    monitoring'' and inserting ``annual report of data collection and 
    monitoring activities''; and
        (3) by striking the last sentence.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 404(c) of such Act 
(113 Stat. 341) is amended by striking ``and an additional total of 
$2,500,000 for fiscal years thereafter'' and inserting ``$2,500,000 for 
fiscal years 2000 through 2004, and $7,500,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2004,''.
    (d) Tsunami Warning System.--Section 404 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4863) is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``(d) Tsunami Warning System.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $800,000 for the Secretary to carry out a project for a 
tsunami warning system, Atlantic Coast of New York.''.
SEC. 5107. COLLEGE POINT, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK.
    In carrying out section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4639), the Secretary shall give priority to work in 
College Point, New York City, New York.
SEC. 5108. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK.
    The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 221 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project for ecosystem restoration, Flushing 
Bay and Creek, New York City, New York, the cost of design and 
construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 5109. HUDSON RIVER, NEW YORK.
    The Secretary may participate with the State of New York, New York 
City, and the Hudson River Park Trust in carrying out activities to 
restore critical marine habitat, improve safety, and protect and 
rehabilitate critical infrastructure with respect to the Hudson River. 
There is authorized to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this 
section.
SEC. 5110. MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NEW YORK.
    As part of the operation and maintenance of the Mount Morris Dam, 
New York, the Secretary may make improvements to the access road for 
the dam to provide safe access to a Federal visitor's center.
SEC. 5111. NORTH HEMPSTEAD AND GLEN COVE NORTH SHORE WATERSHED 
RESTORATION, NEW YORK.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the ecosystem 
restoration, navigation, flood damage reduction, and recreation 
components of the North Hempstead and Glen Cove North Shore watershed 
restoration, New York.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5112. ROCHESTER, NEW YORK.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the ecosystem 
restoration, navigation, flood damage reduction, and recreation 
components of the Port of Rochester waterfront revitalization project, 
Rochester, New York.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5113. NORTH CAROLINA.
    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the State of North Carolina.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for environmental 
infrastructure and resource protection and development projects in 
North Carolina, including projects for--
        (1) wastewater treatment and related facilities;
        (2) combined sewer overflow, water supply, storage, treatment, 
    and related facilities;
        (3) drinking water infrastructure including treatment and 
    related facilities;
        (4) environmental restoration;
        (5) stormwater infrastructure; and
        (6) surface water resource protection and development.
    (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (d) Partnership Agreements.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
    with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and construction 
    of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
    entered into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        development plan or resource protection plan, including 
        appropriate plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
        under this section--
                (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
            reimbursements of project costs.
            (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
        (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
        of the project, in an amount not to exceed 6 percent of the 
        total construction costs of the project, the cost of design 
        work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project 
        before the date of the partnership agreement for the project.
            (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
        of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is the 
        subject of an agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
        interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred 
        in providing the non-Federal share.
            (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
        non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs (including all reasonable costs associated with 
        obtaining permits necessary for the construction, operation, 
        and maintenance of the project on publicly owned or controlled 
        land).
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $13,000,000.
SEC. 5114. STANLY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.
    Section 219(f)(64) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(114 Stat. 2763A-221) is amended by inserting ``water and'' before 
``wastewater''.
SEC. 5115. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, NORTH CAROLINA.
    The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the calculations 
necessary to negotiate and execute a revised, permanent contract for 
water supply storage at John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, North Carolina, 
among the Secretary and the Kerr Lake Regional Water System and the 
city of Henderson, North Carolina.
SEC. 5116. CINCINNATI, OHIO.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may undertake the ecosystem 
restoration and recreation components of the Central Riverfront Park 
Master Plan, dated December 1999, at a total cost of $30,000,000.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of planning, 
design, and construction work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
for the project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
project.
SEC. 5117. OHIO RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
    (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
        (1) Ohio river basin.--The term ``Ohio River Basin'' means the 
    Ohio River, its backwaters, its side channels, and all tributaries 
    (including their watersheds) that drain into the Ohio River and 
    encompassing areas of any of the States of Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, 
    Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Illinois, New York, and Virginia.
        (2) Compact.--The term ``Compact'' means the Ohio River 
    Watershed Sanitation Commission flood and pollution control compact 
    between the States of Indiana, West Virginia, Ohio, Kentucky, 
    Pennsylvania, New York, Illinois, and Virginia, to which consent 
    was given by Congress pursuant to the Act of July 11, 1940 (54 
    Stat. 752) and that was chartered in 1948.
    (b) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide planning, design, and 
construction assistance to the Compact for the improvement of the 
quality of the environment in and along the Ohio River Basin.
    (c) Priorities.--In providing assistance under this section, the 
Secretary shall give priority to reducing or eliminating the presence 
of organic pollutants in the Ohio River Basin through the renovation 
and technological improvement of the organic detection system 
monitoring stations along the Ohio River in the States of Indiana, 
Ohio, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,500,000.
SEC. 5118. TOUSSAINT RIVER NAVIGATION PROJECT, CARROLL TOWNSHIP, OHIO.
    (a) In General.--The costs of operation and maintenance activities 
for the Toussaint River Federal navigation project, Carroll Township, 
Ohio, that are carried out in accordance with section 107 of the River 
and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and relate directly to the 
presence of unexploded ordnance, shall be carried out at Federal 
expense.
    (b) Calculation of Total Costs.--The Secretary shall not consider 
the additional costs of dredging due to the presence of unexploded 
ordnance when calculating the costs of the project referred to in 
subsection (a) for the purposes of section 107(b) of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 577(b)).
SEC. 5119. STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE WATER PLANNING, OKLAHOMA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide technical assistance 
for the development of updates of the Oklahoma comprehensive water 
plan.
    (b) Technical Assistance.--Technical assistance provided under 
subsection (a) may include--
        (1) acquisition of hydrologic data, groundwater 
    characterization, database development, and data distribution;
        (2) expansion of surface water and groundwater monitoring 
    networks;
        (3) assessment of existing water resources, surface water 
    storage, and groundwater storage potential;
        (4) numerical analysis and modeling necessary to provide an 
    integrated understanding of water resources and water management 
    options;
        (5) participation in State planning forums and planning groups;
        (6) coordination of Federal water management planning efforts; 
    and
        (7) technical review of data, models, planning scenarios, and 
    water plans developed by the State.
    (c) Allocation.--The Secretary shall allocate, subject to the 
availability of appropriations, $6,500,000 to provide technical 
assistance and for the development of updates of the Oklahoma 
comprehensive water plan.
    (d) Cost Sharing Requirement.--The non-Federal share of the total 
cost of any activity carried out under this section--
        (1) shall be 25 percent; and
        (2) may be in the form of cash or any in-kind services that the 
    Secretary determines would contribute substantially toward the 
    conduct and completion of the activity assisted.
SEC. 5120. FERN RIDGE DAM, OREGON.
    The Secretary may treat all work carried out for emergency 
corrective actions to repair the embankment dam at the Fern Ridge Lake 
project, Oregon, as a dam safety project. The cost of work carried out 
may be recovered in accordance with section 1203 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 467n; 100 Stat. 4263).
SEC. 5121. ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.
    Section 219(f)(66) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(114 Stat. 2763A-221) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting the following:
            ``(A) In general.--$20,000,000'';
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance 
        with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
        1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
        project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
        interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
        agreement for the project.''; and
        (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph (A) 
    (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with subparagraph 
    (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).
SEC. 5122. CLINTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.
    Section 219(f)(13) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 335) is amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting 
``$2,000,000''.
SEC. 5123. KEHLY RUN DAMS, PENNSYLVANIA.
    Section 504(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 338; 117 Stat. 1842) is amended by striking ``Dams'' and 
inserting ``Dams No. 1-5''.
SEC. 5124. LEHIGH RIVER, LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.
    The Secretary shall use existing water quality data to model the 
effects of the Francis E. Walter Dam, at different water levels, to 
determine its impact on water and related resources in and along the 
Lehigh River in Lehigh County, Pennsylvania. There is authorized to be 
appropriated $500,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5125. NORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA.
    Section 219(f)(11) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 335) is amended by striking ``and Monroe'' and inserting 
``Northumberland, Union, Snyder, Luzerne, and Monroe''.
SEC. 5126. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW YORK.
    (a) Study and Strategy Development.--Section 567(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3787; 114 Stat. 2662) is 
amended--
        (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by inserting ``and 
    carry out'' after ``develop''; and
        (2) in paragraph (2) by striking ``$10,000,000.'' and inserting 
    ``$20,000,000, of which the Secretary may utilize not more than 
    $5,000,000 to design and construct feasible pilot projects during 
    the development of the strategy to demonstrate alternative 
    approaches for the strategy. The total cost for any single pilot 
    project may not exceed $500,000. The Secretary shall evaluate the 
    results of the pilot projects and consider the results in the 
    development of the strategy.''.
    (b) Partnership Agreements.--Section 567(c) of such Act (114 Stat. 
2662) is amended--
        (1) in the subsection heading by striking ``Cooperation'' and 
    inserting ``Partnership''; and
        (2) in the first sentence--
            (A) by inserting ``and carrying out'' after ``developing''; 
        and
            (B) by striking ``cooperation'' and inserting ``cost-
        sharing and partnership''.
    (c) Implementation of Strategy.--Section 567(d) of such Act (114 
Stat. 2663) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting the following:
        ``(1) In general.--The Secretary'';
        (2) in the second sentence of paragraph (1) (as so 
    designated)--
            (A) by striking ``implement'' and inserting ``carry out''; 
        and
            (B) by striking ``implementing'' and inserting ``carrying 
        out'';
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(2) Priority project.--In carrying out projects to implement 
    the strategy, the Secretary shall give priority to the project for 
    ecosystem restoration, Cooperstown, New York, described in the 
    Upper Susquehanna River Basin--Cooperstown Area Ecosystem 
    Restoration Feasibility Study, dated December 2004, prepared by the 
    Corps of Engineers and the New York State department of 
    environmental conservation.''; and
        (4) by aligning the remainder of the text of paragraph (1) (as 
    designated by paragraph (1) of this subsection) with paragraph (2) 
    (as added by paragraph (3) of this subsection).
    (d) Credit.--Section 567 of such Act (110 Stat. 3787; 114 Stat. 
2662) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
share of the cost of a project under this section--
        ``(1) in accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act 
    of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), the cost of design and construction 
    work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project before 
    the date of the partnership agreement for the project; and
        ``(2) the cost of in-kind services and materials provided for 
    the project by the non-Federal interest.''.
SEC. 5127. CANO MARTIN PENA, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO.
    The Secretary shall review a report prepared by the non-Federal 
interest concerning flood protection and environmental restoration for 
Cano Martin Pena, San Juan, Puerto Rico, and, if the Secretary 
determines that the report meets the evaluation and design standards of 
the Corps of Engineers and that the project is feasible, the Secretary 
may carry out the project at a total cost of $150,000,000.
SEC. 5128. LAKES MARION AND MOULTRIE, SOUTH CAROLINA.
    Section 219(f)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220; 117 Stat. 1838) is amended by 
striking ``$35,000,000'' and inserting ``$60,000,000''.
SEC. 5129. CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE, AND 
TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION, SOUTH DAKOTA.
    (a) Disbursement Provisions of State of South Dakota and Cheyenne 
River Sioux Tribe and Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife 
Habitat Restoration Trust Funds.--Section 602(a)(4) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 386) is amended--
        (1) in subparagraph (A)--
            (A) in clause (i) by inserting ``and the Secretary of the 
        Treasury'' after ``Secretary''; and
            (B) by striking clause (ii) and inserting the following:
                ``(ii) Availability of funds.--On notification in 
            accordance with clause (i), the Secretary of the Treasury 
            shall make available to the State of South Dakota funds 
            from the State of South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat 
            Restoration Trust Fund established under section 603 to be 
            used to carry out the plan for terrestrial wildlife habitat 
            restoration submitted by the State of South Dakota after 
            the State certifies to the Secretary of the Treasury that 
            the funds to be disbursed will be used in accordance with 
            section 603(d)(3) and only after the Trust Fund is fully 
            capitalized.''; and
        (2) in subparagraph (B) by striking clause (ii) and inserting 
    the following:
                ``(ii) Availability of funds.--On notification in 
            accordance with clause (i), the Secretary of the Treasury 
            shall make available to the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and 
            the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe funds from the Cheyenne River 
            Sioux Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund 
            and the Lower Brule Sioux Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat 
            Restoration Trust Fund, respectively, established under 
            section 604, to be used to carry out the plans for 
            terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration submitted by the 
            Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, 
            respectively, to after the respective tribe certifies to 
            the Secretary of the Treasury that the funds to be 
            disbursed will be used in accordance with section 604(d)(3) 
            and only after the Trust Fund is fully capitalized.''.
    (b) Investment Provisions of the State of South Dakota Terrestrial 
Wildlife Restoration Trust Fund.--Section 603 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 388; 114 Stat. 2664) is amended--
        (1) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:
    ``(c) Investments.--
        ``(1) Eligible obligations.--Notwithstanding any other 
    provision of law, the Secretary of the Treasury shall invest the 
    amounts deposited under subsection (b) and the interest earned on 
    those amounts only in interest-bearing obligations of the United 
    States issued directly to the Fund.
        ``(2) Investment requirements.--
            ``(A) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall 
        invest the amounts in the Fund in accordance with the 
        requirements of this paragraph.
            ``(B) Separate investments of principal and interest.--
                ``(i) Principal account.--The amounts deposited in the 
            Fund under subsection (b) shall be credited to an account 
            within the Fund (referred to in this paragraph as the 
            `principal account') and invested as provided in 
            subparagraph (C).
                ``(ii) Interest account.--The interest earned from 
            investing amounts in the principal account of the Fund 
            shall be transferred to a separate account within the Fund 
            (referred to in this paragraph as the `interest account') 
            and invested as provided in subparagraph (D).
                ``(iii) Crediting.--The interest earned from investing 
            amounts in the interest account of the Fund shall be 
            credited to the interest account.
            ``(C) Investment of principal account.--
                ``(i) Initial investment.--Each amount deposited in the 
            principal account of the Fund shall be invested initially 
            in eligible obligations having the shortest maturity then 
            available until the date on which the amount is divided 
            into 3 substantially equal portions and those portions are 
            invested in eligible obligations that are identical (except 
            for transferability) to the next-issued publicly issued 
            Treasury obligations having a 2-year maturity, a 5-year 
            maturity, and a 10-year maturity, respectively.
                ``(ii) Subsequent investment.--As each 2-year, 5-year, 
            and 10-year eligible obligation matures, the principal of 
            the maturing eligible obligation shall also be invested 
            initially in the shortest-maturity eligible obligation then 
            available until the principal is reinvested substantially 
            equally in the eligible obligations that are identical 
            (except for transferability) to the next-issued publicly 
            issued Treasury obligations having 2-year, 5-year, and 10-
            year maturities.
                ``(iii) Discontinuance of issuance of obligations.--If 
            the Department of the Treasury discontinues issuing to the 
            public obligations having 2-year, 5-year, or 10-year 
            maturities, the principal of any maturing eligible 
            obligation shall be reinvested substantially equally in 
            eligible obligations that are identical (except for 
            transferability) to the next-issued publicly issued 
            Treasury obligations of the maturities longer than 1 year 
            then available.
            ``(D) Investment of interest account.--
                ``(i) Before full capitalization.--Until the date on 
            which the Fund is fully capitalized, amounts in the 
            interest account of the Fund shall be invested in eligible 
            obligations that are identical (except for transferability) 
            to publicly issued Treasury obligations that have 
            maturities that coincide, to the maximum extent 
            practicable, with the date on which the Fund is expected to 
            be fully capitalized.
                ``(ii) After full capitalization.--On and after the 
            date on which the Fund is fully capitalized, amounts in the 
            interest account of the Fund shall be invested and 
            reinvested in eligible obligations having the shortest 
            maturity then available until the amounts are withdrawn and 
            transferred to fund the activities authorized under 
            subsection (d)(3).
            ``(E) Par purchase price.--The price to be paid for 
        eligible obligations purchased as investments of the principal 
        account shall not exceed the par value of the obligations so 
        that the amount of the principal account shall be preserved in 
        perpetuity.
            ``(F) Highest yield.--Among eligible obligations having the 
        same maturity and purchase price, the obligation to be 
        purchased shall be the obligation having the highest yield.
            ``(G) Holding to maturity.--Eligible obligations purchased 
        shall generally be held to their maturities.
        ``(3) Annual review of investment activities.--Not less 
    frequently than once each calendar year, the Secretary of the 
    Treasury shall review with the State of South Dakota the results of 
    the investment activities and financial status of the Fund during 
    the preceding 12-month period.
        ``(4) Audits.--
            ``(A) In general.--The activities of the State of South 
        Dakota (referred to in this subsection as the `State') in 
        carrying out the plan of the State for terrestrial wildlife 
        habitat restoration under section 602(a) shall be audited as 
        part of the annual audit that the State is required to prepare 
        under the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133 (or a 
        successor circulation).
            ``(B) Determination by auditors.--An auditor that conducts 
        an audit under subparagraph (A) shall--
                ``(i) determine whether funds received by the State 
            under this section during the period covered by the audit 
            were used to carry out the plan of the State in accordance 
            with this section; and
                ``(ii) include the determination under clause (i) in 
            the written findings of the audit.
        ``(5) Modification of investment requirements.--
            ``(A) In general.--If the Secretary of the Treasury 
        determines that meeting the requirements under paragraph (2) 
        with respect to the investment of a Fund is not practicable, or 
        would result in adverse consequences for the Fund, the 
        Secretary shall modify the requirements, as the Secretary 
        determines to be necessary.
            ``(B) Consultation.--Before modifying a requirement under 
        subparagraph (A), the Secretary of the Treasury shall consult 
        with the State regarding the proposed modification.'';
        (2) in subsection (d)(2) by inserting ``of the Treasury'' after 
    ``Secretary''; and
        (3) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:
    ``(f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury to pay expenses 
associated with investing the Fund and auditing the uses of amounts 
withdrawn from the Fund--
        ``(1) $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 and 2007; and
        ``(2) such sums as are necessary for each subsequent fiscal 
    year.''.
    (c) Investment Provisions for Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Lower 
Brule Sioux Tribe Trust Funds.--Section 604 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 389; 114 Stat. 2665) is amended--
        (1) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:
    ``(c) Investments.--
        ``(1) Eligible obligations.--Notwithstanding any other 
    provision of law, the Secretary of the Treasury shall invest the 
    amounts deposited under subsection (b) and the interest earned on 
    those amounts only in interest-bearing obligations of the United 
    States issued directly to the Funds.
        ``(2) Investment requirements.--
            ``(A) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall 
        invest the amounts in each of the Funds in accordance with the 
        requirements of this paragraph.
            ``(B) Separate investments of principal and interest.--
                ``(i) Principal account.--The amounts deposited in each 
            Fund under subsection (b) shall be credited to an account 
            within the Fund (referred to in this paragraph as the 
            `principal account') and invested as provided in 
            subparagraph (C).
                ``(ii) Interest account.--The interest earned from 
            investing amounts in the principal account of each Fund 
            shall be transferred to a separate account within the Fund 
            (referred to in this paragraph as the `interest account') 
            and invested as provided in subparagraph (D).
                ``(iii) Crediting.--The interest earned from investing 
            amounts in the interest account of each Fund shall be 
            credited to the interest account.
            ``(C) Investment of principal account.--
                ``(i) Initial investment.--Each amount deposited in the 
            principal account of each Fund shall be invested initially 
            in eligible obligations having the shortest maturity then 
            available until the date on which the amount is divided 
            into 3 substantially equal portions and those portions are 
            invested in eligible obligations that are identical (except 
            for transferability) to the next-issued publicly issued 
            Treasury obligations having a 2-year maturity, a 5-year 
            maturity, and a 10-year maturity, respectively.
                ``(ii) Subsequent investment.--As each 2-year, 5-year, 
            and 10-year eligible obligation matures, the principal of 
            the maturing eligible obligation shall also be invested 
            initially in the shortest-maturity eligible obligation then 
            available until the principal is reinvested substantially 
            equally in the eligible obligations that are identical 
            (except for transferability) to the next-issued publicly 
            issued Treasury obligations having 2-year, 5-year, and 10-
            year maturities.
                ``(iii) Discontinuation of issuance of obligations.--If 
            the Department of the Treasury discontinues issuing to the 
            public obligations having 2-year, 5-year, or 10-year 
            maturities, the principal of any maturing eligible 
            obligation shall be reinvested substantially equally in 
            eligible obligations that are identical (except for 
            transferability) to the next-issued publicly issued 
            Treasury obligations of the maturities longer than 1 year 
            then available.
            ``(D) Investment of interest account.--
                ``(i) Before full capitalization.--Until the date on 
            which each Fund is fully capitalized, amounts in the 
            interest account of the Fund shall be invested in eligible 
            obligations that are identical (except for transferability) 
            to publicly issued Treasury obligations that have 
            maturities that coincide, to the maximum extent 
            practicable, with the date on which the Fund is expected to 
            be fully capitalized.
                ``(ii) After full capitalization.--On and after the 
            date on which each Fund is fully capitalized, amounts in 
            the interest account of the Fund shall be invested and 
            reinvested in eligible obligations having the shortest 
            maturity then available until the amounts are withdrawn and 
            transferred to fund the activities authorized under 
            subsection (d)(3).
            ``(E) Par purchase price.--The price to be paid for 
        eligible obligations purchased as investments of the principal 
        account shall not exceed the par value of the obligations so 
        that the amount of the principal account shall be preserved in 
        perpetuity.
            ``(F) Highest yield.--Among eligible obligations having the 
        same maturity and purchase price, the obligation to be 
        purchased shall be the obligation having the highest yield.
            ``(G) Holding to maturity.--Eligible obligations purchased 
        shall generally be held to their maturities.
        ``(3) Annual review of investment activities.--Not less 
    frequently than once each calendar year, the Secretary of the 
    Treasury shall review with the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the 
    Lower Brule Sioux Tribe (referred to in this subsection as the 
    `Tribes') the results of the investment activities and financial 
    status of the Funds during the preceding 12-month period.
        ``(4) Audits.--
            ``(A) In general.--The activities of the Tribes in carrying 
        out the plans of the Tribes for terrestrial wildlife habitat 
        restoration under section 602(a) shall be audited as part of 
        the annual audit that the Tribes are required to prepare under 
        the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133 (or a 
        successor circulation).
            ``(B) Determination by auditors.--An auditor that conducts 
        an audit under subparagraph (A) shall--
                ``(i) determine whether funds received by the Tribes 
            under this section during the period covered by the audit 
            were used to carry out the plan of the appropriate Tribe in 
            accordance with this section; and
                ``(ii) include the determination under clause (i) in 
            the written findings of the audit.
        ``(5) Modification of investment requirements.--
            ``(A) In general.--If the Secretary of the Treasury 
        determines that meeting the requirements under paragraph (2) 
        with respect to the investment of a Fund is not practicable, or 
        would result in adverse consequences for the Fund, the 
        Secretary shall modify the requirements, as the Secretary 
        determines to be necessary.
            ``(B) Consultation.--Before modifying a requirement under 
        subparagraph (A), the Secretary of the Treasury shall consult 
        with the Tribes regarding the proposed modification.''; and
        (2) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:
    ``(f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury to pay expenses 
associated with investing the Funds and auditing the uses of amounts 
withdrawn from the Funds--
        ``(1) $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 and 2007; and
        ``(2) such sums as are necessary for each subsequent fiscal 
    year.''.
SEC. 5130. EAST TENNESSEE.
    (a) East Tennessee Defined.--In this section, the term ``East 
Tennessee'' means the counties of Blount, Knox, Loudon, McMinn, Monroe, 
and Sevier, Tennessee.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
East Tennessee.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in East Tennessee, including projects for wastewater treatment 
and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
environmental restoration, and surface water resource protection and 
development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
    with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and construction 
    of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
    entered into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        or resource protection and development plan, including 
        appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
        under this section--
                (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
            reimbursements of project costs.
            (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
        (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
        of the project the cost of design work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.
            (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
        of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of an 
        agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in providing 
        the non-Federal share of the project cost.
            (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
        non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
        project cost (including all reasonable costs associated with 
        obtaining permits necessary for the construction, operation, 
        and maintenance of the project on publicly owned or controlled 
        land), but the credit may not exceed 25 percent of total 
        project costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.
SEC. 5131. FRITZ LANDING, TENNESSEE.
    The Secretary shall--
        (1) conduct a study of the Fritz Landing Agricultural Spur 
    Levee, Tennessee, to determine the extent of levee modifications 
    that would be required to make the levee and associated drainage 
    structures consistent with Federal standards;
        (2) design and construct such modifications; and
        (3) after completion of such modifications, incorporate the 
    levee into the project for flood control, Mississippi River and 
    Tributaries, authorized by the Act entitled ``An Act for the 
    control of floods on the Mississippi River and its tributaries, and 
    for other purposes'', approved May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 534-539).
SEC. 5132. J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TENNESSEE.
    The Secretary shall plan, design, and construct a trail system at 
the J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Tennessee, authorized by section 
4 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain 
public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other 
purposes'', approved June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1217), and adjacent public 
property, including design and construction of support facilities. In 
carrying out such improvements, the Secretary is authorized to use 
funds made available by the State of Tennessee from any Federal or 
State source, or both.
SEC. 5133. NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in the ecosystem 
restoration, recreation, navigation, and flood damage reduction 
components of the Nashville Riverfront Concept Plan, dated February 
2007.
    (b) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall coordinate with appropriate representatives in the vicinity of 
Nashville, Tennessee, including the Nashville Parks and Recreation 
Department, the city of Nashville, and Davidson County.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5134. NONCONNAH WEIR, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE.
    The project for flood control, Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee and 
Mississippi, authorized by section 401 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124) and modified by the section 
334 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2611), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary--
        (1) to reconstruct, at Federal expense, the weir originally 
    constructed in the vicinity of the mouth of Nonconnah Creek; and
        (2) to make repairs and maintain the weir in the future so that 
    the weir functions properly.
SEC. 5135. TENNESSEE RIVER PARTNERSHIP.
    (a) In General.--As part of the operation and maintenance of the 
project for navigation, Tennessee River, Tennessee, Alabama, 
Mississippi, and Kentucky, authorized by the first section of the River 
and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 927), the Secretary may enter 
into a partnership with a nonprofit entity to remove debris from the 
Tennessee River in the vicinity of Knoxville, Tennessee, by providing a 
vessel to such entity, at Federal expense, for such debris removal 
purposes.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $500,000.
SEC. 5136. TOWN CREEK, LENOIR CITY, TENNESSEE.
    The Secretary shall design and construct the project for flood 
damage reduction designated as Alternative 4 in the Town Creek, Lenoir 
City, Loudon County, Tennessee, feasibility report of the Nashville 
district engineer, dated November 2000, under the authority of section 
205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), notwithstanding 
section 1 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701a; 49 
Stat. 1570). The non-Federal share of the cost of the project shall be 
subject to section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)).
SEC. 5137. UPPER MISSISSIPPI EMBAYMENT, TENNESSEE, ARKANSAS, AND 
MISSISSIPPI.
    The Secretary may participate with non-Federal and nonprofit 
entities to address issues concerning managing groundwater as a 
sustainable resource through the Upper Mississippi Embayment, 
Tennessee, Arkansas, and Mississippi, and to coordinate the protection 
of groundwater supply and groundwater quality of the Embayment with 
local surface water protection programs. There is authorized to be 
appropriated $5,000,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 5138. TEXAS.
    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the State of Texas.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of planning, design, and construction assistance for 
water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection and 
development projects in Texas, including projects for water supply, 
storage, treatment, and related facilities, water quality protection, 
wastewater treatment, and related facilities, environmental 
restoration, and surface water resource protection, and development, as 
identified by the Texas Water Development Board.
    (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (d) Partnership Agreements.--Before providing assistance under this 
section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement with a 
non-Federal interest.
    (e) Cost Sharing.--
        (1) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
    under this section--
            (A) shall be 75 percent; and
            (B) may be provided in the form of grants or reimbursements 
        of project costs.
        (2) In-kind services.--The non-Federal share may be provided in 
    the form of materials and in-kind services, including planning, 
    design, construction, and management services, as the Secretary 
    determines to be compatible with, and necessary for, the project.
        (3) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance 
    with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
    5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the 
    cost of design work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
    project before the date of the partnership agreement for the 
    project.
        (4) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The non-
    Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, rights-
    of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of project 
    costs.
        (5) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
    operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
    assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.
SEC. 5139. BOSQUE RIVER WATERSHED, TEXAS.
    (a) Comprehensive Plan.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
appropriate Federal, State, and local entities, shall develop, as 
expeditiously as practicable, a comprehensive plan for development of 
new technologies and innovative approaches for restoring, preserving, 
and protecting the Bosque River watershed within Bosque, Hamilton, 
McLennan, and Erath Counties, Texas. The Secretary, in cooperation with 
the Secretary of Agriculture, may carry out activities identified in 
the comprehensive plan to demonstrate practicable alternatives for 
stabilization and enhancement of land and water resources in the basin.
    (b) Services of Nonprofit Institutions and Other Entities.--In 
carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary may utilize, through 
contracts or other means, the services of nonprofit institutions and 
such other entities as the Secretary considers appropriate.
    (c) Non-Federal Share.--
        (1) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
    section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
    toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
    planning, design, and construction work carried out by the non-
    Federal interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
    agreement for the project.
        (2) Development of comprehensive plan.--The non-Federal share 
    of the cost of development of the plan under subsection (a) shall 
    be 25 percent.
        (3) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of the 
    cost of operation and maintenance for measures constructed with 
    assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.
SEC. 5140. DALLAS COUNTY REGION, TEXAS.
    (a) Dallas County Region Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Dallas County region'' means the city of Dallas, and the 
municipalities of DeSoto, Duncanville, Lancaster, Wilmer, Hutchins, 
Balch Springs, Cedar Hill, Glenn Heights, and Ferris, Texas.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the Dallas County region.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in the Dallas County region, including projects for wastewater 
treatment and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
environmental restoration, and surface water resource protection and 
development.
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
    with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and construction 
    of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project 
    entered into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        or resource protection and development plan, including 
        appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
        under this section--
                (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                (ii) may be provided in the form of grants or 
            reimbursements of project costs.
            (B) Credit for work.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
        accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
        (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
        of the project the cost design work carried out by the non-
        Federal interest for the project before the date of the 
        partnership agreement for the project.
            (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
        of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of an 
        agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in providing 
        the non-Federal share.
            (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
        non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs (including all reasonable costs associated with 
        obtaining permits necessary for the construction, operation, 
        and maintenance of the project on publicly owned or controlled 
        land), but the credit may not exceed 25 percent of total 
        project costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    (h) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.
SEC. 5141. DALLAS FLOODWAY, DALLAS, TEXAS.
    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Trinity River and 
tributaries, Texas, authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled, ``An 
Act authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation of certain 
public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved 
March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 18), is modified to--
        (1) direct the Secretary to review the Balanced Vision Plan for 
    the Trinity River Corridor, Dallas, Texas, dated December 2003 and 
    amended in March 2004, prepared by the non-Federal interest for the 
    project;
        (2) direct the Secretary to review the Interior Levee Drainage 
    Study Phase-I report, Dallas, Texas, dated September 2006, prepared 
    by the non-Federal interest; and
        (3) if the Secretary determines that the project is technically 
    sound and environmentally acceptable, authorize the Secretary to 
    construct the project at a total cost of $459,000,000, with an 
    estimated Federal cost of $298,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $161,000,000.
    (b) Credit.--
        (1) In-kind contributions.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
    accordance with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
    U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
    project the cost of planning, design, and construction work carried 
    out by the non-Federal interest for the project before the date of 
    the partnership agreement for the project.
        (2) Cash contributions.--The Secretary shall accept funds 
    provided by the non-Federal interest for use in carrying out 
    planning, engineering, and design for the project. The Federal 
    share of such planning, engineering, and design carried out with 
    non-Federal contributions shall be credited against the non-Federal 
    share of the cost of the project.
SEC. 5142. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS.
    Section 575(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3789; 113 Stat. 311) is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (3) by striking ``and'' at the end;
        (2) in paragraph (4) by striking the period at the end and 
    inserting ``; and''; and
        (3) by adding the following:
        ``(5) the project for flood control, Upper White Oak Bayou, 
    Texas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4125).''.
SEC. 5143. JOHNSON CREEK, ARLINGTON, TEXAS.
    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
environmental restoration, and recreation, Johnson Creek, Arlington, 
Texas, authorized by section 101(b)(14) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat 280), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project substantially in accordance with the 
report entitled ``Johnson Creek: A Vision of Conservation'', dated 
March 30, 2006, at a total cost of $80,000,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $52,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$28,000,000, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--
        (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
    project may be provided in cash or in the form of in-kind services 
    or materials.
        (2) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
    section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
    toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project the cost of 
    planning, design, and construction work carried out by the non-
    Federal interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
    agreement for the project.
    (c) Special Rule.--In evaluating and implementing the project, the 
Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184).
    (d) Conforming Amendment.--Section 134 of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2263) is repealed.
SEC. 5144. ONION CREEK, TEXAS.
    (a) Inclusion of Costs and Benefits of Relocation of Flood-Prone 
Residences.--In carrying out the study for the project for flood damage 
reduction, recreation, and ecosystem restoration, Onion Creek, Texas, 
the Secretary shall include the costs and benefits associated with the 
relocation of flood-prone residences in the study area for the project 
in the period beginning 2 years before the date of initiation of the 
study and ending on the date of execution of the partnership agreement 
for construction of the project to the extent the Secretary determines 
such relocations are compatible with the project.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the 
non-Federal share of the cost of the project referred to in subsection 
(a) the cost of relocation of those flood-prone residences described in 
subsection (a) that are incurred by the non-Federal interest before the 
date of the partnership agreement for the project.
SEC. 5145. CONNECTICUT RIVER DAMS, VERMONT.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate, design, and carry 
out structural modifications at Federal cost to the Union Village Dam 
(Ompompanoosuc River), North Hartland Dam (Ottauquechee River), North 
Springfield Dam (Black River), Ball Mountain Dam (West River), and 
Townshend Dam (West River), Vermont, to regulate flow and temperature 
to mitigate downstream impacts on aquatic habitat and fisheries.
    (b) Inclusion.--During the evaluation and design portion of the 
modifications authorized by this section, the Secretary shall ensure 
that a sustainable flow analysis is conducted for each dam.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000.
SEC. 5146. LAKE CHAMPLAIN CANAL, VERMONT AND NEW YORK.
    (a) Dispersal Barrier Project.--The Secretary shall determine, at 
Federal expense, the feasibility of a dispersal barrier project at the 
Lake Champlain Canal, Vermont and New York, to prevent the spread of 
aquatic nuisance species.
    (b) Construction, Maintenance, and Operation.--If the Secretary 
determines that the project described in subsection (a) is feasible, 
the Secretary shall construct, maintain, and operate a dispersal 
barrier at the Lake Champlain Canal at Federal expense.
SEC. 5147. DYKE MARSH, FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA.
    The Secretary shall accept funds from the National Park Service to 
restore Dyke Marsh, Fairfax County, Virginia.
SEC. 5148. EASTERN SHORE AND SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA.
    Section 219(f)(10) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``$20,000,000 for water supply and wastewater 
    infrastructure'' and inserting the following:
            ``(A) In general.--$20,000,000 for water supply, wastewater 
        infrastructure, and environmental restoration'';
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance 
        with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
        1962d-5b), toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
        project the cost of work carried out by the non-Federal 
        interest for the project before the date of the partnership 
        agreement for the project.''; and
        (3) by aligning the remainder of the text of subparagraph (A) 
    (as designated by paragraph (1) of this section) with subparagraph 
    (B) (as added by paragraph (2) of this section).
SEC. 5149. JAMES RIVER, VIRGINIA.
    The Secretary shall accept funds from the National Park Service to 
provide technical and project management assistance for the James 
River, Virginia, with a particular emphasis on locations along the 
shoreline adversely impacted by Hurricane Isabel.
SEC. 5150. BAKER BAY AND ILWACO HARBOR, WASHINGTON.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study of increased siltation in Baker 
Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington, to determine if the siltation is the 
result of a Federal navigation project (including diverted flows from 
the Columbia River) and, if the Secretary determines that the siltation 
is the result of a Federal navigation project, the Secretary shall 
carry out a project to mitigate the siltation as part of maintenance of 
the Federal navigation project.
SEC. 5151. HAMILTON ISLAND CAMPGROUND, WASHINGTON.
    The Secretary is authorized to plan, design, and construct a 
campground for Bonneville Lock and Dam at Hamilton Island (also known 
as ``Strawberry Island'') in Skamania County, Washington.
SEC. 5152. EROSION CONTROL, PUGET ISLAND, WAHKIAKUM COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
    (a) In General.--The Lower Columbia River levees and bank 
protection works authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 
1950 (64 Stat. 178) is modified with regard to the Wahkiakum County 
diking districts No. 1 and 3, but without regard to any cost ceiling 
authorized before the date of enactment of this Act, to direct the 
Secretary to provide a one-time placement of dredged material along 
portions of the Columbia River shoreline of Puget Island, Washington, 
between river miles 38 to 47, and the shoreline of Westport Beach, 
Clatsop County, Oregon, between river miles 43 to 45, to protect 
economic and environmental resources in the area from further erosion.
    (b) Coordination and Cost-Sharing Requirements.--The Secretary 
shall carry out subsection (a)--
        (1) in coordination with appropriate resource agencies; and
        (2) at Federal expense.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000.
SEC. 5153. WILLAPA BAY, WASHINGTON.
    Section 545 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2675) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ``may construct'' and 
    inserting ``shall construct''; and
        (2) by inserting ``and ecosystem restoration'' after ``erosion 
    protection'' each place it appears.
SEC. 5154. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL.
    (a) Cheat and Tygart River Basins, West Virginia.--Section 
581(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3790; 113 Stat. 313) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``flood control measures'' and inserting 
    ``structural and nonstructural flood control, streambank 
    protection, stormwater management, and channel clearing and 
    modification measures''; and
        (2) by inserting ``with respect to measures that incorporate 
    levees or floodwalls'' before the semicolon.
    (b) Priority Communities.--Section 581(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3791) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (5);
        (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (6) and 
    inserting a semicolon; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(7) Etna, Pennsylvania, in the Pine Creek watershed; and
        ``(8) Millvale, Pennsylvania, in the Girty's Run River 
    basin.''.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 581(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3791) is amended by 
striking ``$12,000,000'' and inserting ``$90,000,000''.
SEC. 5155. CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA.
    Section 571 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 371) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a)--
            (A) by striking ``Nicholas,''; and
            (B) by striking ``Gilmer,'';
        (2) in subsection (h) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting 
    ``$20,000,000''; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
undertaken under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.
    ``(j) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Not more than 10 percent of the 
amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section 
at Federal expense.''.
SEC. 5156. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.
    (a) Corps of Engineers.--Section 340 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856; 113 Stat. 320) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Corps of Engineers.--Not more than 10 percent of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps of 
Engineers district offices to administer projects under this section at 
Federal expense.''.
    (b) Southern West Virginia Defined.--Section 340(f) of such Act is 
amended by inserting ``Nicholas,'' after ``Greenbrier,''.
    (c) Nonprofit Entities.--Section 340 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856) is further amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(i) Nonprofit Entities.--In accordance with section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected local government.''.
SEC. 5157. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
INTERESTS.
    Section 211(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 701b-13) is amended by adding at the end the following:
        ``(12) Perris, california.--The project for flood control, 
    Perris, California.
        ``(13) Thornton reservoir, cook county, illinois.--An element 
    of the project for flood control, Chicagoland Underflow Plan, 
    Illinois.
        ``(14) Larose to golden meadow, louisiana.--The project for 
    flood control, Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.
        ``(15) Buffalo bayou, texas.--A project for flood control, 
    Buffalo Bayou, Texas, to provide an alternative to the project 
    authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor Act of June 
    20, 1938 (52 Stat. 804) and modified by section 3a of the Flood 
    Control Act of August 11, 1939 (53 Stat. 1414).
        ``(16) Halls bayou, texas.--A project for flood control, Halls 
    Bayou, Texas, to provide an alternative to the project for flood 
    control, Buffalo Bayou and tributaries, Texas, authorized by 
    section 101(a)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
    (104 Stat. 4610).
        ``(17) Menomonee river watershed, wisconsin.--The project for 
    the Menomonee River Watershed, Wisconsin, including--
            ``(A) the Underwood Creek diversion facility project 
        (Milwaukee County Grounds); and
            ``(B) the Greater Milwaukee Rivers watershed project.''.
SEC. 5158. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS.
    Section 219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334; 113 Stat. 1494; 114 Stat. 
2763A-219; 119 Stat. 2255) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (c)(5) by striking ``a project for the 
    elimination or control of combined sewer overflows'' and inserting 
    ``projects for the design, installation, enhancement, or repair of 
    sewer systems'';
        (2) in subsection (e)(1) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and 
    inserting ``$32,500,000''; and
        (3) in subsection (f)--
            (A) by striking the undesignated paragraph relating to 
        Charleston, South Carolina, and inserting the following:
        ``(72) Charleston, south carolina.--$10,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, including wastewater collection systems, and 
    stormwater system improvements, Charleston, South Carolina.'';
            (B) by redesignating the paragraph (71) relating to Placer 
        and El Dorado Counties, California, as paragraph (73);
            (C) by redesignating the paragraph (72) relating to Lassen, 
        Plumas, Butte, Sierra, and Nevada Counties, California, as 
        paragraph (74);
            (D) by striking the paragraph (71) relating to 
        Indianapolis, Indiana, and inserting the following:
        ``(75) Indianapolis, indiana.--$6,430,000 for environmental 
    infrastructure for Indianapolis, Indiana.'';
            (E) by redesignating the paragraph (73) relating to St. 
        Croix Falls, Wisconsin, as paragraph (76);
            (F) by redesignating paragraph (72), relating to Alpine, 
        California, as paragraph (77); and
            (G) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(78) St. clair county, alabama.--$5,000,000 for water related 
    infrastructure, St. Clair County, Alabama.
        ``(79) Crawford county, arkansas.--$35,000,000 for water supply 
    infrastructure, Crawford County, Arkansas.
        ``(80) Alameda and contra costa counties, california.--
    $25,000,000 for recycled water treatment facilities within the East 
    Bay Municipal Utility District service area, Alameda and Contra 
    Costa Counties, California.
        ``(81) Aliso creek, orange county, california.--$5,000,000 for 
    water related infrastructure, Aliso Creek, Orange County, 
    California.
        ``(82) Amador county, california.--$3,000,000 for wastewater 
    collection and treatment infrastructure, Amador County, California.
        ``(83) Arcadia, sierra madre, and upland, california.--
    $33,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, Arcadia, 
    Sierra Madre, and Upland, California, including $13,000,000 for 
    stormwater infrastructure for Upland, California.
        ``(84) Big bear area regional wastewater agency, california.--
    $15,000,000 for water reclamation and distribution infrastructure, 
    Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Agency, California.
        ``(85) Brawley colonia, imperial county, california.--
    $1,400,000 for water infrastructure to improve water quality in the 
    Brawley Colonia Water District, Imperial County, California.
        ``(86) Calaveras county, california.--$3,000,000 for water 
    supply and wastewater infrastructure improvement projects in 
    Calaveras County, California, including wastewater reclamation, 
    recycling, and conjunctive use projects.
        ``(87) Contra costa water district, california.--$23,000,000 
    for water and wastewater infrastructure for the Contra Costa Water 
    District, California.
        ``(88) East bay, san francisco, and santa clara areas, 
    california.--$4,000,000 for a desalination project to serve the 
    East Bay, San Francisco, and Santa Clara areas, California.
        ``(89) East palo alto, california.--$4,000,000 for a new pump 
    station and stormwater management and drainage system, East Palo 
    Alto, California.
        ``(90) Imperial county, california.--$10,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, including a wastewater disinfection facility and 
    polishing system, to improve water quality in the vicinity of 
    Calexico, California, on the southern New River, Imperial County, 
    California.
        ``(91) La habra, california.--$5,000,000 for wastewater and 
    water related infrastructure, city of La Habra, California.
        ``(92) La mirada, california.--$4,000,000 for the planning, 
    design, and construction of a stormwater program in La Mirada, 
    California.
        ``(93) Los angeles county, california.--$3,000,000 for 
    wastewater and water related infrastructure, Diamond Bar, La Habra 
    Heights, and Rowland Heights, Los Angeles County, California.
        ``(94) Los angeles county, california.--$20,000,000 for the 
    planning, design, and construction of water related infrastructure 
    for Santa Monica Bay and the coastal zone of Los Angeles County, 
    California.
        ``(95) Malibu, california.--$3,000,000 for municipal wastewater 
    and recycled water infrastructure, Malibu Creek Watershed 
    Protection Project, Malibu, California.
        ``(96) Montebello, california.--$4,000,000 for water 
    infrastructure improvements in south Montebello, California.
        ``(97) New river, california.--$10,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure to improve water quality in the New River, 
    California.
        ``(98) Orange county, california.--$10,000,000 for wastewater 
    and water related infrastructure, Anaheim, Brea, Mission Viejo, 
    Rancho Santa Margarita, and Yorba Linda, Orange County, California.
        ``(99) Port of stockton, stockton, california.--$3,000,000 for 
    water and wastewater infrastructure projects for Rough and Ready 
    Island and vicinity, Stockton, California.
        ``(100) Perris, california.--$3,000,000 for recycled water 
    transmission infrastructure, Eastern Municipal Water District, 
    Perris, California.
        ``(101) San bernardino county, california.--$9,000,000 for 
    wastewater and water related infrastructure, Chino and Chino Hills, 
    San Bernardino County, California.
        ``(102) Santa clara county, california.--$5,500,000 for an 
    advanced recycling water treatment plant in Santa Clara County, 
    California.
        ``(103) Santa monica, california.--$3,000,000 for improving 
    water system reliability, Santa Monica, California.
        ``(104) Southern los angeles county, california.--$15,000,000 
    for environmental infrastructure for the groundwater basin 
    optimization pipeline, Southern Los Angeles County, California.
        ``(105) Stockton, california.--$33,000,000 for water treatment 
    and distribution infrastructure, Stockton, California.
        ``(106) Sweetwater reservoir, san diego county, california.--
    $375,000 to improve water quality and remove nonnative aquatic 
    nuisance species from the Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, 
    California.
        ``(107) Whittier, california.--$8,000,000 for water, 
    wastewater, and water related infrastructure, Whittier, California.
        ``(108) Arkansas valley conduit, colorado.--$10,000,000 for the 
    Arkansas Valley Conduit, Colorado.
        ``(109) Boulder county, colorado.--$10,000,000 for water supply 
    infrastructure, Boulder County, Colorado.
        ``(110) Montezuma and la plata counties, colorado.--$1,000,000 
    for water and wastewater related infrastructure for the Ute 
    Mountain project, Montezuma and La Plata Counties, Colorado.
        ``(111) Otero, bent, crowley, kiowa, and prowers counties, 
    colorado.--$35,000,000 for water transmission infrastructure, 
    Otero, Bent, Crowley, Kiowa, and Prowers Counties, Colorado.
        ``(112) Pueblo and otero counties, colorado.--$34,000,000 for 
    water transmission infrastructure, Pueblo and Otero Counties, 
    Colorado.
        ``(113) Enfield, connecticut.--$1,000,000 for infiltration and 
    inflow correction, Enfield, Connecticut.
        ``(114) Ledyard and montville, connecticut.--$7,113,000 for 
    water infrastructure, Ledyard and Montville, Connecticut.
        ``(115) New haven, connecticut.--$300,000 for stormwater system 
    improvements, New Haven, Connecticut.
        ``(116) Norwalk, connecticut.--$3,000,000 for the Keeler Brook 
    Storm Water Improvement Project, Norwalk, Connecticut.
        ``(117) Plainville, connecticut.--$6,280,000 for wastewater 
    treatment, Plainville, Connecticut.
        ``(118) Southington, connecticut.--$9,420,000 for water supply 
    infrastructure, Southington, Connecticut.
        ``(119) Anacostia river, district of columbia and maryland.--
    $20,000,000 for environmental infrastructure and resource 
    protection and development to enhance water quality and living 
    resources in the Anacostia River watershed, District of Columbia 
    and Maryland.
        ``(120) District of columbia.--$35,000,000 for implementation 
    of a combined sewer overflow long-term control plan in the District 
    of Columbia.
        ``(121) Charlotte county, florida.--$3,000,000 for water supply 
    infrastructure, Charlotte County, Florida.
        ``(122) Charlotte, lee, and collier counties, florida.--
    $20,000,000 for water supply interconnectivity infrastructure, 
    Charlotte, Lee, and Collier Counties, Florida.
        ``(123) Collier county, florida.--$5,000,000 for water 
    infrastructure to improve water quality in the vicinity of the 
    Gordon River, Collier County, Florida.
        ``(124) Hillsborough county, florida.--$6,250,000 for water 
    infrastructure and supply enhancement, Hillsborough County, 
    Florida.
        ``(125) Jacksonville, florida.--$25,000,000 for wastewater 
    related infrastructure, including septic tank replacements, 
    Jacksonville, Florida.
        ``(126) Sarasota county, florida.--$10,000,000 for water and 
    wastewater infrastructure in Sarasota County, Florida.
        ``(127) South seminole and north orange county, florida.--
    $30,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure for the South Seminole 
    and North Orange Wastewater Transmission Authority, Florida.
        ``(128) Miami-dade county, florida.--$6,250,000 for water reuse 
    supply and a water transmission pipeline, Miami-Dade County, 
    Florida.
        ``(129) Palm beach county, florida.--$7,500,000 for water 
    infrastructure, Palm Beach County, Florida.
        ``(130) Albany, georgia.--$4,000,000 for a storm drainage 
    system, Albany, Georgia.
        ``(131) Banks county, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
    infrastructure improvements, Banks County, Georgia.
        ``(132) Berrien county, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
    infrastructure improvements, Berrien County, Georgia.
        ``(133) Chattooga county, georgia.--$8,000,000 for wastewater 
    and drinking water infrastructure improvement, Chattooga County, 
    Georgia.
        ``(134) Chattooga, floyd, gordon, walker, and whitifield 
    counties, georgia.--$10,000,000 for water infrastructure 
    improvements, Armuchee Valley, Chattooga, Floyd, Gordon, Walker, 
    and Whitifield Counties, Georgia.
        ``(135) Dahlonega, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
    infrastructure improvements, Dahlonega, Georgia.
        ``(136) East point, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
    infrastructure improvements, city of East Point, Georgia.
        ``(137) Fayetteville, grantville, lagrange, pine mountain 
    (harris county), douglasville, and carrollton, georgia.--
    $24,500,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, Fayetteville, 
    Grantville, LaGrange, Pine Mountain (Harris County), Douglasville, 
    and Carrollton, Georgia.
        ``(138) Meriwether and spalding counties, georgia.--$7,000,000 
    for water and wastewater infrastructure, Meriwether and Spalding 
    Counties, Georgia.
        ``(139) Moultrie, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water supply 
    infrastructure, Moultrie, Georgia.
        ``(140) Stephens county/city of toccoa, georgia.--$8,000,000 
    water infrastructure improvements, Stephens County/city of Toccoa, 
    Georgia.
        ``(141) North vernon and butlerville, indiana.--$1,700,000 for 
    wastewater infrastructure, North Vernon and Butlerville, Indiana.
        ``(142) Salem, washington county, indiana.--$3,200,000 for 
    water supply infrastructure, Salem, Washington County, Indiana.
        ``(143) Atchison, kansas.--$20,000,000 to address combined 
    sewer overflows, Atchison, Kansas.
        ``(144) Central kentucky.--$10,000,000 for water related 
    infrastructure and resource protection and development, Scott, 
    Franklin, Woodford, Anderson, Fayette, Mercer, Jessamine, Boyle, 
    Lincoln, Garrard, Madison, Estill, Powell, Clark, Montgomery, and 
    Bourbon Counties, Kentucky.
        ``(145) Lafayette, louisiana.--$1,200,000 for water and 
    wastewater improvements, Lafayette, Louisiana.
        ``(146) Lafourche parish, louisiana.--$2,300,000 for measures 
    to prevent the intrusion of saltwater into the freshwater system, 
    Lafourche Parish, Louisiana.
        ``(147) Lake charles, louisiana.--$1,000,000 for water and 
    wastewater improvements, Lake Charles, Louisiana.
        ``(148) Northwest louisiana council of governments, 
    louisiana.--$2,000,000 for water and wastewater improvements, 
    Northwest Louisiana Council of Governments, Louisiana.
        ``(149) Ouachita parish, louisiana.--$1,000,000 for water and 
    wastewater improvements, Ouachita Parish, Louisiana.
        ``(150) Plaquemine, louisiana.--$7,000,000 for sanitary sewer 
    and wastewater infrastructure, Plaquemine, Louisiana.
        ``(151) Rapides area planning commission, louisiana.--
    $1,000,000 for water and wastewater improvements, Rapides, 
    Louisiana.
        ``(152) Shreveport, louisiana.--$20,000,000 for water supply 
    infrastructure in Shreveport, Louisiana.
        ``(153) South central planning and development commission, 
    louisiana.--$2,500,000 for water and wastewater improvements, South 
    Central Planning and Development Commission, Louisiana.
        ``(154) Union-lincoln regional water supply project, 
    louisiana.--$2,000,000 for the Union-Lincoln Regional Water Supply 
    project, Louisiana.
        ``(155) Chesapeake bay improvements, maryland, virginia, and 
    district of columbia.--$30,000,000 for environmental infrastructure 
    projects to benefit the Chesapeake Bay, including the nutrient 
    removal project at the Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment facility in 
    the District of Columbia.
        ``(156) Chesapeake bay region, maryland and virginia.--
    $40,000,000 for water pollution control, Chesapeake Bay Region, 
    Maryland and Virginia.
        ``(157) Michigan combined sewer overflows.--$35,000,000 for 
    correction of combined sewer overflows, Michigan.
        ``(158) Central iron range sanitary sewer district, 
    minnesota.--$12,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure for the 
    Central Iron Range Sanitary Sewer District to serve the cities of 
    Hibbing, Chisholm, Buhl, and Kinney, and Balkan and Great Scott 
    Townships, Minnesota.
        ``(159) Central lake region sanitary district, minnesota.--
    $2,000,000 for sanitary sewer and wastewater infrastructure for the 
    Central Lake Region Sanitary District, Minnesota, to serve Le 
    Grande and Moe Townships, Minnesota.
        ``(160) Goodview, minnesota.--$3,000,000 for water quality 
    infrastructure, Goodview, Minnesota.
        ``(161) Grand rapids, minnesota.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Grand Rapids, Minnesota.
        ``(162) Willmar, minnesota.--$15,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Willmar, Minnesota.
        ``(163) Biloxi, mississippi.--$5,000,000 for water and 
    wastewater related infrastructure, city of Biloxi, Mississippi.
        ``(164) Corinth, mississippi.--$7,500,000 for a surface water 
    program, city of Corinth, Mississippi.
        ``(165) Gulfport, mississippi.--$5,000,000 for water and 
    wastewater related infrastructure, city of Gulfport, Mississippi.
        ``(166) Harrison county, mississippi.--$5,000,000 for water and 
    wastewater related infrastructure, Harrison County, Mississippi.
        ``(167) Jackson, mississippi.--$25,000,000 for water and 
    wastewater infrastructure, Jackson, Mississippi.
        ``(168) Clark county, nevada.--$30,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Clark County, Nevada.
        ``(169) Clean water coalition, nevada.--$50,000,000 for the 
    Systems Conveyance and Operations Program, Clark County, Henderson, 
    Las Vegas, and North Las Vegas, Nevada.
        ``(170) Glendale dam diversion structure, nevada.--$10,000,000 
    for water system improvements to the Glendale Dam Diversion 
    Structure for the Truckee Meadows Water Authority, Nevada.
        ``(171) Henderson, nevada.--$13,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Henderson, Nevada.
        ``(172) Indian springs, nevada.--$12,000,000 for construction 
    of wastewater system improvements for the Indian Springs community, 
    Nevada.
        ``(173) Reno, nevada.--$13,000,000 for construction of a water 
    conservation project for the Highland Canal, Mogul Bypass in Reno, 
    Nevada.
        ``(174) Washoe county, nevada.--$14,000,000 for construction of 
    water infrastructure improvements to the Huffaker Hills Reservoir 
    Conservation Project, Washoe County, Nevada.
        ``(175) Cranford township, new jersey.--$6,000,000 for storm 
    sewer improvements, Cranford Township, New Jersey.
        ``(176) Middletown township, new jersey.--$1,100,000 for storm 
    sewer improvements, Middletown Township, New Jersey.
        ``(177) Paterson, new jersey.--$35,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Paterson, New Jersey.
        ``(178) Rahway valley, new jersey.--$25,000,000 for sanitary 
    sewer and storm sewer improvements in the service area of the 
    Rahway Valley Sewerage Authority, New Jersey.
        ``(179) Babylon, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Town of Babylon, New York.
        ``(180) Ellicottville, new york.--$2,000,000 for water supply, 
    water, and wastewater infrastructure in Ellicottville, New York.
        ``(181) Elmira, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Elmira, New York.
        ``(182) Essex hamlet, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Essex Hamlet, New York.
        ``(183) Fleming, new york.--$5,000,000 for drinking water 
    infrastructure, Fleming, New York.
        ``(184) Kiryas joel, new york.--$5,000,000 for drinking water 
    infrastructure, village of Kiryas Joel, New York.
        ``(185) Niagara falls, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Niagara Falls Water Board, New York.
        ``(186) Patchogue, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, village of Patchogue, New York.
        ``(187) Sennett, new york.--$1,500,000 for water 
    infrastructure, town of Sennett, New York.
        ``(188) Springport and fleming, new york.--$10,000,000 for 
    water related infrastructure, including water mains, pump stations, 
    and water storage tanks, Springport and Fleming, New York.
        ``(189) Wellsville, new york.--$2,000,000 for water supply, 
    water, and wastewater infrastructure in Wellsville, New York.
        ``(190) Yates county, new york.--$5,000,000 for drinking water 
    infrastructure, Yates County, New York.
        ``(191) Cabarrus county, north carolina.--$4,500,000 for water 
    related infrastructure, Cabarrus County, North Carolina.
        ``(192) Cary, wake county, north carolina.--$4,000,000 for a 
    water reclamation facility, Cary, Wake County, North Carolina.
        ``(193) Charlotte, north carolina.--$14,000,000 for the Briar 
    Creek Relief Sewer project, city of Charlotte, North Carolina.
        ``(194) Fayetteville, cumberland county, north carolina.--
    $6,000,000 for water and sewer upgrades, city of Fayetteville, 
    Cumberland County, North Carolina.
        ``(195) Mooresville, north carolina.--$4,000,000 for water and 
    wastewater infrastructure improvements, town of Mooresville, North 
    Carolina.
        ``(196) Neuse regional water and sewer authority, north 
    carolina.--$4,000,000 for the Neuse regional drinking water 
    facility, Kinston, North Carolina.
        ``(197) Richmond county, north carolina.--$13,500,000 for water 
    related infrastructure, Richmond County, North Carolina.
        ``(198) Union county, north carolina.--$6,000,000 for water 
    related infrastructure, Union County, North Carolina.
        ``(199) Washington county, north carolina.--$1,000,000 for 
    water and wastewater infrastructure, Washington County, North 
    Carolina.
        ``(200) Winston-salem, north carolina.--$3,000,000 for 
    stormwater upgrades, city of Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
        ``(201) North dakota.--$15,000,000 for water-related 
    infrastructure, North Dakota.
        ``(202) Devils lake, north dakota.--$15,000,000 for water 
    supply infrastructure, Devils Lake, North Dakota.
        ``(203) Saipan, northern mariana islands.--$20,000,000 for 
    water related infrastructure, Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands.
        ``(204) Akron, ohio.--$5,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, 
    Akron, Ohio.
        ``(205) Burr oak regional water district, ohio.--$4,000,000 for 
    construction of a water line to extend from a well field near 
    Chauncey, Ohio, to a water treatment plant near Millfield, Ohio.
        ``(206) Cincinnati, ohio.--$1,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Cincinnati, Ohio.
        ``(207) Cleveland, ohio.--$2,500,000 for Flats East Bank water 
    and wastewater infrastructure, city of Cleveland, Ohio.
        ``(208) Columbus, ohio.--$4,500,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Columbus, Ohio.
        ``(209) Dayton, ohio.--$1,000,000 for water and wastewater 
    infrastructure, Dayton, Ohio.
        ``(210) Defiance county, ohio.--$1,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Defiance County, Ohio.
        ``(211) Fostoria, ohio.--$2,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Fostoria, Ohio.
        ``(212) Fremont, ohio.--$2,000,000 for construction of off-
    stream water supply reservoir, Fremont, Ohio.
        ``(213) Lake county, ohio.--$1,500,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Lake County, Ohio.
        ``(214) Lawrence county, ohio.--$5,000,000 for Union Rome 
    wastewater infrastructure, Lawrence County, Ohio.
        ``(215) Meigs county, ohio.--$1,000,000 to extend the Tupper 
    Plains Regional Water District water line to Meigs County, Ohio.
        ``(216) Mentor-on-lake, ohio.--$625,000 for water and 
    wastewater infrastructure, Mentor-on-Lake, Ohio.
        ``(217) Vinton county, ohio.--$1,000,000 to construct water 
    lines in Vinton and Brown Townships, Ohio.
        ``(218) Willowick, ohio.--$665,000 for water and wastewater 
    infrastructure, Willowick, Ohio.
        ``(219) Ada, oklahoma.--$1,700,000 for sewer improvements and 
    other water infrastructure, city of Ada, Oklahoma.
        ``(220) Alva, oklahoma.--$250,000 for wastewater infrastructure 
    improvements, city of Alva, Oklahoma.
        ``(221) Ardmore, oklahoma.--$1,900,000 for water and sewer 
    infrastructure improvements, city of Ardmore, Oklahoma.
        ``(222) Bartlesville, oklahoma.--$2,500,000 for water supply 
    infrastructure, city of Bartlesville, Oklahoma.
        ``(223) Bethany, oklahoma.--$1,500,000 for water improvements 
    and water related infrastructure, city of Bethany, Oklahoma.
        ``(224) Chickasha, oklahoma.--$650,000 for industrial park 
    sewer infrastructure, city of Chickasha, Oklahoma.
        ``(225) Disney and langley, oklahoma.--$2,500,000 for water and 
    sewer improvements and water related infrastructure, cities of 
    Disney and Langley, Oklahoma.
        ``(226) Durant, oklahoma.--$3,300,000 for bayou restoration and 
    water related infrastructure, city of Durant, Oklahoma.
        ``(227) Eastern oklahoma state university, wilberton, 
    oklahoma.--$1,000,000 for sewer and utility upgrades and water 
    related infrastructure, Eastern Oklahoma State University, 
    Wilberton, Oklahoma.
        ``(228) Guymon, oklahoma.--$16,000,000 for water and wastewater 
    related infrastructure, city of Guymon, Oklahoma.
        ``(229) Konawa, oklahoma.--$500,000 for water treatment 
    infrastructure improvements, city of Konawa, Oklahoma.
        ``(230) Lugert-altus irrigation district, altus, oklahoma.--
    $5,000,000 for water related infrastructure improvements, Lugert-
    Altus Irrigation District, Altus, Oklahoma.
        ``(231) Midwest city, oklahoma.--$2,000,000 for improvements to 
    water related infrastructure, the City of Midwest City, Oklahoma.
        ``(232) Mustang, oklahoma.--$3,325,000 for water improvements 
    and water related infrastructure, city of Mustang, Oklahoma.
        ``(233) Norman, oklahoma.--$10,000,000 for water related 
    infrastructure, Norman, Oklahoma.
        ``(234) Oklahoma panhandle state university, guymon, 
    oklahoma.--$275,000 for water testing facility and water related 
    infrastructure development, Oklahoma Panhandle State University, 
    Guymon, Oklahoma.
        ``(235) Weatherford, oklahoma.--$500,000 for arsenic program 
    and water related infrastructure, city of Weatherford, Oklahoma.
        ``(236) Woodward, oklahoma.--$1,500,000 for water improvements 
    and water related infrastructure, Woodward, Oklahoma.
        ``(237) Albany, oregon.--$35,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure to improve habitat restoration, Albany, Oregon.
        ``(238) Beaver creek reservoir, pennsylvania.--$3,000,000 for 
    projects for water supply and related activities, Beaver Creek 
    Reservoir, Clarion County, Beaver and Salem Townships, 
    Pennsylvania.
        ``(239) Hatfield borough, pennsylvania.--$310,000 for 
    wastewater related infrastructure for Hatfield Borough, 
    Pennsylvania.
        ``(240) Lehigh county, pennsylvania.--$5,000,000 for stormwater 
    control measures and storm sewer improvements, Lehigh County, 
    Pennsylvania.
        ``(241) North wales borough, pennsylvania.--$1,516,584 for 
    wastewater related infrastructure for North Wales Borough, 
    Pennsylvania.
        ``(242) Pen argyl, pennsylvania.--$5,250,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania.
        ``(243) Philadelphia, pennsylvania.--$1,600,000 for wastewater 
    related infrastructure for Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
        ``(244) Stockerton borough, tatamy borough, and palmer 
    township, pennsylvania.--$10,000,000 for stormwater control 
    measures, particularly to address sinkholes, in the vicinity of 
    Stockerton Borough, Tatamy Borough, and Palmer Township, 
    Pennsylvania.
        ``(245) Vera cruz, pennsylvania.--$5,500,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Vera Cruz, Pennsylvania.
        ``(246) Commonwealth of puerto rico.--$35,000,000 for water and 
    wastewater infrastructure in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
        ``(247) Charleston, south carolina.--$4,000,000 for stormwater 
    control measures and storm sewer improvements, Spring Street/
    Fishburne Street drainage project, Charleston, South Carolina.
        ``(248) Charleston and west ashley, south carolina.--$6,000,000 
    for wastewater tunnel replacement, Charleston and West Ashley, 
    South Carolina.
        ``(249) Crooked creek, marlboro county, south carolina.--
    $25,000,000 for a project for water storage and water supply 
    infrastructure on Crooked Creek, Marlboro County, South Carolina.
        ``(250) Myrtle beach, south carolina.--$18,000,000 for 
    environmental infrastructure, including ocean outfalls, Myrtle 
    Beach, South Carolina.
        ``(251) North myrtle beach, south carolina.--$11,000,000 for 
    environmental infrastructure, including ocean outfalls, North 
    Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
        ``(252) Surfside, south carolina.--$11,000,000 for 
    environmental infrastructure, including stormwater system 
    improvements and ocean outfalls, Surfside, South Carolina.
        ``(253) Cheyenne river sioux reservation (dewey and ziebach 
    counties) and perkins and meade counties, south dakota.--
    $65,000,000 for water related infrastructure, Cheyenne River Sioux 
    Reservation (Dewey and Ziebach counties) and Perkins and Meade 
    Counties, South Dakota.
        ``(254) Athens, tennessee.--$16,000,000 for wastewater 
    infrastructure, Athens, Tennessee.
        ``(255) Blaine, tennessee.--$500,000 for water supply and 
    wastewater infrastructure, Blaine, Tennessee.
        ``(256) Claiborne county, tennessee.--$1,250,000 for water 
    supply and wastewater infrastructure, Claiborne County, Tennessee.
        ``(257) Giles county, tennessee.--$2,000,000 for water supply 
    and wastewater infrastructure, county of Giles, Tennessee.
        ``(258) Grainger county, tennessee.--$1,250,000 for water 
    supply and wastewater infrastructure, Grainger County, Tennessee.
        ``(259) Hamilton county, tennessee.--$500,000 for water supply 
    and wastewater infrastructure, Hamilton County, Tennessee.
        ``(260) Harrogate, tennessee.--$2,000,000 for water supply and 
    wastewater infrastructure, city of Harrogate, Tennessee.
        ``(261) Johnson county, tennessee.--$600,000 for water supply 
    and wastewater infrastructure, Johnson County, Tennessee.
        ``(262) Knoxville, tennessee.--$5,000,000 for water supply and 
    wastewater infrastructure, city of Knoxville, Tennessee.
        ``(263) Nashville, tennessee.--$5,000,000 for water supply and 
    wastewater infrastructure, Nashville, Tennessee.
        ``(264) Lewis, lawrence, and wayne counties, tennessee.--
    $2,000,000 for water supply and wastewater infrastructure, counties 
    of Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne, Tennessee.
        ``(265) Oak ridge, tennessee.--$4,000,000 for water supply and 
    wastewater infrastructure, city of Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
        ``(266) Plateau utility district, morgan county, tennessee.--
    $1,000,000 for water supply and wastewater infrastructure, Morgan 
    County, Tennessee.
        ``(267) Shelby county, tennessee.--$4,000,000 for water related 
    environmental infrastructure, county of Shelby, Tennessee.
        ``(268) Central texas.--$20,000,000 for water and wastewater 
    infrastructure in Bosque, Brazos, Burleson, Grimes, Hill, Hood, 
    Johnson, Madison, McLennan, Limestone, Robertson, and Somervell 
    Counties, Texas.
        ``(269) El paso county, texas.--$25,000,000 for water related 
    infrastructure and resource protection, including stormwater 
    management, and development, El Paso County, Texas.
        ``(270) Ft. bend county, texas.--$20,000,000 for water and 
    wastewater infrastructure, Ft. Bend County, Texas.
        ``(271) Duchesne, iron, and uintah counties, utah.--$10,800,000 
    for water related infrastructure, Duchesne, Iron, and Uintah 
    Counties, Utah.
        ``(272) Northern west virginia.--$20,000,000 for water and 
    wastewater infrastructure in Hancock, Ohio, Marshall, Wetzel, 
    Tyler, Pleasants, Wood, Doddridge, Monongalia, Marion, Harrison, 
    Taylor, Barbour, Preston, Tucker, Mineral, Grant, Gilmer, Brooke, 
    and Ritchie Counties, West Virginia.
        ``(273) United states virgin islands.--$25,000,000 for 
    wastewater infrastructure for the St. Croix Anguilla wastewater 
    treatment plant and the St. Thomas Charlotte Amalie wastewater 
    treatment plant, United States Virgin Islands.''.

                      TITLE VI--FLORIDA EVERGLADES

SEC. 6001. HILLSBORO AND OKEECHOBEE AQUIFER, FLORIDA.
    (a) Modification.--The project for Hillsboro and Okeechobee 
Aquifer, Florida, authorized by section 101(a)(16) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to carry out the project at a total cost of 
$42,500,000.
    (b) Treatment.--Section 601(b)(2)(A) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2681) is amended--
        (1) in clause (i) by adding at the end the following: ``The 
    project for aquifer storage and recovery, Hillsboro and Okeechobee 
    Aquifer, Florida, authorized by section 101(a)(16) of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276), shall be treated 
    for purposes of this section as being in the Plan, except that 
    operation and maintenance costs of the project shall remain a non-
    Federal responsibility.''; and
        (2) in clause (iii) by inserting after ``subparagraph (B)'' the 
    following: ``and the project for aquifer storage and recovery, 
    Hillsboro and Okeechobee Aquifer''.
SEC. 6002. PILOT PROJECTS.
    Section 601(b)(2)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2681) is amended--
        (1) in the matter preceding clause (i)--
            (A) by striking ``$69,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$71,200,000''; and
            (B) by striking ``$34,500,000'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``$35,600,000''; and
        (2) in clause (i)--
            (A) by striking ``$6,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$8,200,000''; and
            (B) by striking ``$3,000,000'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``$4,100,000''.
SEC. 6003. MAXIMUM COSTS.
    (a) Maximum Cost of Projects.--Section 601(b)(2)(E) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2683) is amended by 
inserting ``and section (d)'' before the period at the end.
    (b) Maximum Cost of Program Authority.--Section 601(c)(3) of such 
Act (114 Stat. 2684) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(C) Maximum cost of program authority.--Section 902 of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280) 
        shall apply to the individual project funding limits in 
        subparagraph (A) and the aggregate cost limits in subparagraph 
        (B).''.
SEC. 6004. CREDIT.
    Section 601(e)(5)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2685) is amended--
        (1) in clause (i)--
            (A) by striking ``or'' at the end of subclause (I);
            (B) by adding ``or'' at the end of subclause (II); and
            (C) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(III) the credit is provided for work carried out 
            before the date of the partnership agreement between the 
            Secretary and the non-Federal sponsor, as defined in an 
            agreement between the Secretary and the non-Federal sponsor 
            providing for such credit;''; and
        (2) in clause (ii)--
            (A) by striking ``design agreement or the project 
        cooperation''; and
            (B) by inserting before the semicolon the following: ``, 
        including in the case of credit provided under clause (i)(III) 
        conditions relating to design and construction''.
SEC. 6005. OUTREACH AND ASSISTANCE.
    Section 601(k) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2691) is amended by adding at the end the following:
        ``(3) Maximum expenditures.--The Secretary may expend up to 
    $3,000,000 per fiscal year for fiscal years beginning after 
    September 30, 2004, to carry out this subsection.''.
SEC. 6006. CRITICAL RESTORATION PROJECTS.
    Section 528(b)(3)(C) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3769) is amended--
        (1) in clause (i) by striking ``$75,000,000'' and all that 
    follows and inserting ``$95,000,000''; and
        (2) by striking clause (ii) and inserting the following:
                ``(ii) Federal share.--

                    ``(I) In general.--Except as provided in subclause 
                (II), the Federal share of the cost of carrying out a 
                project under subparagraph (A) shall not exceed 
                $25,000,000.
                    ``(II) Seminole water conservation plan.--The 
                Federal share of the cost of carrying out the Seminole 
                water conservation plan shall not exceed 
                $30,000,000.''.

SEC. 6007. REGIONAL ENGINEERING MODEL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall complete the development and 
testing of the regional engineering model for environmental restoration 
as expeditiously as practicable.
    (b) Usage.--The Secretary shall consider using, as appropriate, the 
regional engineering model for environmental restoration in the 
development of future water resource projects, including projects 
developed pursuant to section 601 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680).

                   TITLE VII--LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA

SEC. 7001. DEFINITIONS.
    In this title, the following definitions apply:
        (1) Coastal louisiana ecosystem.--The term ``coastal Louisiana 
    ecosystem'' means the coastal area of Louisiana from the Sabine 
    River on the west to the Pearl River on the east, including those 
    parts of the Atchafalaya River Basin and the Mississippi River 
    Deltaic Plain below the Old River Control Structure and the Chenier 
    Plain included within the study area of the restoration plan.
        (2) Governor.--The term ``Governor'' means the Governor of the 
    State of Louisiana.
        (3) Restoration plan.--The term ``restoration plan'' means the 
    report of the Chief of Engineers for ecosystem restoration for the 
    Louisiana Coastal Area dated January 31, 2005.
        (4) Task force.--The term ``Task Force'' means the Coastal 
    Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task Force 
    established by section 7003.
        (5) Comprehensive plan.--The term ``comprehensive plan'' means 
    the plan developed under section 7002 and any revisions thereto.
SEC. 7002. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the Governor, 
shall develop a comprehensive plan for protecting, preserving, and 
restoring the coastal Louisiana ecosystem.
    (b) Integration of Plan Into Comprehensive Hurricane Protection 
Study.--In developing the comprehensive plan, the Secretary shall 
integrate the restoration plan into the analysis and design of the 
comprehensive hurricane protection study authorized by title I of the 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2247).
    (c) Consistency With Comprehensive Coastal Protection Master 
Plan.--In developing the comprehensive plan, the Secretary shall ensure 
that the plan is not inconsistent with the goals, analysis, and design 
of the comprehensive coastal protection master plan authorized and 
defined pursuant to Act 8 of the First Extraordinary Session of the 
Louisiana State Legislature, 2005.
    (d) Inclusions.--The comprehensive plan shall include a description 
of--
        (1) the framework of a long-term program integrated with 
    hurricane and storm damage reduction, flood damage reduction, and 
    navigation activities that provide for the comprehensive 
    protection, conservation, and restoration of the wetlands, 
    estuaries, barrier islands, shorelines, and related land and 
    features of the coastal Louisiana ecosystem, including protection 
    of critical resources, habitat, and infrastructure from the effects 
    of a coastal storm, a hurricane, erosion, or subsidence;
        (2) the means by which a new technology, or an improved 
    technique, can be integrated into the program referred to in 
    paragraph (1);
        (3) the role of other Federal and State agencies and programs 
    in carrying out such program;
        (4) specific, measurable success criteria (including ecological 
    criteria) by which success of the plan will be measured;
        (5) proposed projects in order of priority as determined by 
    their respective potential to contribute to--
            (A) creation of coastal wetlands; and
            (B) flood protection of communities ranked by population 
        density and level of protection; and
        (6) efforts by Federal, State, and local interests to address 
    sociological, economic, and related fields of law.
    (e) Considerations.--In developing the comprehensive plan, the 
Secretary shall consider the advisability of integrating into the 
program referred to in subsection (d)(1)--
        (1) an investigation and study of the maximum effective use of 
    the water and sediment of the Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers 
    for coastal restoration purposes consistent with flood control and 
    navigation;
        (2) a schedule for the design and implementation of large-scale 
    water and sediment reintroduction projects and an assessment of 
    funding needs from any source;
        (3) an investigation and assessment of alterations in the 
    operation of the Old River Control Structure, consistent with flood 
    control and navigation purposes;
        (4) any related Federal or State project being carried out on 
    the date on which the plan is developed;
        (5) any activity in the restoration plan; and
        (6) any other project or activity identified in one or more 
    of--
            (A) the Mississippi River and Tributaries program;
            (B) the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation Plan;
            (C) the Louisiana Coastal Zone Management Plan;
            (D) the plan of the State of Louisiana entitled 
        ``Integrated Ecosystem Restoration and Hurricane Protection--
        Louisiana's Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable 
        Coast''; and
            (E) other relevant reports as determined by the Secretary.
    (f) Reports to Congress.--
        (1) Initial report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
    report containing the comprehensive plan.
        (2) Updates.--Not later than 5 years after the date of 
    submission of a report under paragraph (1), and at least once every 
    5 years thereafter until implementation of the comprehensive plan 
    is complete, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report 
    containing an update of the plan and an assessment of the progress 
    made in implementing the plan.
SEC. 7003. LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a program for 
ecosystem restoration, Louisiana Coastal Area, Louisiana, substantially 
in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, dated January 
31, 2005.
    (b) Priorities.--
        (1) In general.--In carrying out the program under subsection 
    (a), the Secretary shall give priority to--
            (A) any portion of the program identified in the report 
        described in subsection (a) as a critical restoration feature;
            (B) any Mississippi River diversion project that--
                (i) will protect a major population area of the 
            Pontchartrain, Pearl, Breton Sound, Barataria, or 
            Terrebonne basins; and
                (ii) will produce an environmental benefit to the 
            coastal Louisiana ecosystem;
            (C) any barrier island, or barrier shoreline, project 
        that--
                (i) will be carried out in conjunction with a 
            Mississippi River diversion project; and
                (ii) will protect a major population area;
            (D) any project that will reduce storm surge and prevent or 
        reduce the risk of loss of human life and the risk to public 
        safety; and
            (E) a project to physically modify the Mississippi River-
        Gulf Outlet and to restore the areas affected by the 
        Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet in accordance with the 
        comprehensive plan to be developed under section 7002(a) and 
        consistent with sections 7006(c)(1)(A) and 7013.
SEC. 7004. COASTAL LOUISIANA ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION AND RESTORATION TASK 
FORCE.
    (a) Establishment.--There is established a task force to be known 
as the Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Task 
Force (in this section referred to as the ``Task Force'').
    (b) Membership.--The Task Force shall consist of the following 
members (or, in the case of the head of a Federal agency, a designee of 
the head of the agency at the level of Assistant Secretary or an 
equivalent level):
        (1) The Secretary.
        (2) The Secretary of the Interior.
        (3) The Secretary of Commerce.
        (4) The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.
        (5) The Secretary of Agriculture.
        (6) The Secretary of Transportation.
        (7) The Secretary of Energy.
        (8) The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management 
    Agency.
        (9) The Commandant of the Coast Guard.
        (10) The Chair of the Coastal Protection and Restoration 
    Authority of Louisiana.
        (11) Two representatives of the State of Louisiana selected by 
    the Governor.
    (c) Duties.--The Task Force shall make recommendations to the 
Secretary regarding--
        (1) policies, strategies, plans, programs, projects, and 
    activities for addressing conservation, protection, restoration, 
    and maintenance of the coastal Louisiana ecosystem;
        (2) financial participation by each agency represented on the 
    Task Force in conserving, protecting, restoring, and maintaining 
    the coastal Louisiana ecosystem, including recommendations--
            (A) that identify funds from current agency missions and 
        budgets; and
            (B) for coordinating individual agency budget requests; and
        (3) the comprehensive plan to be developed under section 
    7002(a).
    (d) Report.--The Task Force shall submit to Congress a biennial 
report that summarizes the activities and recommendations of the Task 
Force.
    (e) Working Groups.--
        (1) General authority.--The Task Force may establish such 
    working groups as the Task Force determines to be necessary to 
    assist the Task Force in carrying out this section.
        (2) Hurricanes katrina and rita.--
            (A) Integration team.--The Task Force shall establish a 
        working group for the purpose of advising the Task Force of 
        opportunities to integrate the planning, engineering, design, 
        implementation, and performance of Corps of Engineers projects 
        for hurricane and storm damage reduction, flood damage 
        reduction, ecosystem restoration, and navigation in those areas 
        in Louisiana for which a major disaster has been declared by 
        the President as a result of Hurricane Katrina or Rita.
            (B) Expertise; representation.--In establishing the working 
        group under subparagraph (A), the Task Force shall ensure that 
        the group--
                (i) has expertise in coastal estuaries, diversions, 
            coastal restoration and wetlands protection, ecosystem 
            restoration, hurricane protection, storm damage reduction 
            systems, navigation, and ports; and
                (ii) represents the State of Louisiana and local 
            governments in southern Louisiana.
            (C) Duties.--In developing its recommendations under this 
        subsection, the working group shall--
                (i) review reports relating to the performance of, and 
            recommendations relating to the future performance of, the 
            hurricane, coastal, and flood protection systems in 
            southern Louisiana, including the reports issued by the 
            Interagency Performance Evaluation Team, the National 
            Academy of Sciences, the National Science Foundation, the 
            American Society of Civil Engineers, and Team Louisiana for 
            the purpose of advising the Task Force and the Secretary on 
            opportunities to improve the performance of the protection 
            systems;
                (ii) assist in providing reviews under section 2035; 
            and
                (iii) carry out such other duties as the Task Force or 
            the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
    (f) Compensation.--Members of the Task Force and members of a 
working group established by the Task Force may not receive 
compensation for their services as members of the Task Force or working 
group, as the case may be.
    (g) Travel Expenses.--Travel expenses incurred by members of the 
Task Force and members of a working group established by the Task 
Force, in the performance of their service on the Task Force or working 
group, as the case may be, shall be paid by the agency or entity that 
the member represents.
    (h) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the Task Force or any working group 
established by the Task Force.
SEC. 7005. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS.
    (a) Review.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the non-Federal 
interest of the project involved, shall review each Federally-
authorized water resources project in the coastal Louisiana ecosystem 
being carried out or completed as of the date of enactment of this Act 
to determine whether the project needs to be modified--
        (1) to take into account the program authorized by section 7003 
    and the projects authorized by sections 7006(e) and 7013; or
        (2) to contribute to ecosystem restoration under section 7003, 
    7006(e), or 7013.
    (b) Modifications.--Subject to subsections (c) and (d), the 
Secretary may carry out the modifications described in subsection (a).
    (c) Public Notice and Comment.--Before completing the report 
required under subsection (d), the Secretary shall provide an 
opportunity for public notice and comment.
    (d) Report.--
        (1) In general.--Before modifying an operation or feature of a 
    project under subsection (b), the Secretary shall submit to the 
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
    Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
    of the Senate a report describing the modification.
        (2) Inclusion.--A report describing a modification under 
    paragraph (1) shall include such information relating to the 
    timeline for and cost of the modification, as the Secretary 
    determines to be relevant.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.
SEC. 7006. CONSTRUCTION.
    (a) Science and Technology.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out a coastal 
    Louisiana ecosystem science and technology program substantially in 
    accordance with the restoration plan at a total cost of 
    $100,000,000.
        (2) Purposes.--The purposes of the program shall be--
            (A) to identify any uncertainty relating to the physical, 
        chemical, geological, biological, and cultural baseline 
        conditions in the coastal Louisiana ecosystem;
            (B) to improve knowledge of the physical, chemical, 
        geological, biological, and cultural baseline conditions in the 
        coastal Louisiana ecosystem;
            (C) to identify and develop technologies, models, and 
        methods to carry out this subsection; and
            (D) to advance and expedite the implementation of the 
        comprehensive plan.
        (3) Working groups.--The Secretary may establish such working 
    groups as the Secretary determines to be necessary to assist the 
    Secretary in carrying out this subsection.
        (4) Contracts and cooperative agreements.--In carrying out this 
    subsection, the Secretary may enter into a contract or cooperative 
    agreement with a consortium of academic institutions in Louisiana 
    with scientific or engineering expertise in the restoration of 
    aquatic and marine ecosystems for coastal restoration and 
    enhancement through science and technology.
        (5) Applicability of the federal advisory committee act.--The 
    Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to a 
    working group established under this subsection.
    (b) Demonstration Projects.--
        (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary may 
    carry out demonstration projects substantially in accordance with 
    the restoration plan and within the coastal Louisiana ecosystem for 
    the purpose of resolving critical areas of scientific or 
    technological uncertainty related to the implementation of the 
    comprehensive plan.
        (2) Maximum cost.--
            (A) Total cost.--The total cost for planning, design, and 
        construction of all projects under this subsection shall not 
        exceed $100,000,000.
            (B) Individual project.--The total cost of any single 
        project under this subsection shall not exceed $25,000,000.
    (c) Initial Projects.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out the 
    following projects substantially in accordance with the restoration 
    plan:
            (A) Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet environmental restoration 
        at a total cost of $105,300,000, but not including those 
        elements of the project that produce navigation benefits.
            (B) Small diversion at Hope Canal at a total cost of 
        $68,600,000.
            (C) Barataria basin barrier shoreline restoration at a 
        total cost of $242,600,000.
            (D) Small Bayou Lafourche reintroduction at a total cost of 
        $133,500,000.
            (E) Medium diversion at Myrtle Grove with dedicated 
        dredging at a total cost of $278,300,000.
        (2) Modifications.--
            (A) In general.--In carrying out each project under 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary shall carry out such modifications 
        as may be necessary to the ecosystem restoration features 
        identified in the restoration plan--
                (i) to address the impacts of Hurricanes Katrina and 
            Rita on the areas of the project; and
                (ii) to ensure consistency with the project authorized 
            by section 7013 (including work in and around the vicinity 
            of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet).
            (B) Integration.--The Secretary shall ensure that each 
        modification under subparagraph (A) is taken into account in 
        conducting the study of comprehensive hurricane protection 
        authorized by title I of the Energy and Water Development 
        Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2247).
            (C) Mississippi river-gulf outlet.--In carrying out the 
        project under paragraph (1)(A), the Secretary shall carry out 
        such modifications as may be necessary to make the project 
        consistent with and complementary to the closure and 
        restoration of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet authorized by 
        section 7013.
        (3) Construction reports.--Before the Secretary may begin 
    construction of any project under this subsection, the Secretary 
    shall submit a report documenting any modifications to the project, 
    including cost changes, to the Committee on Transportation and 
    Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
    Environment and Public Works of the Senate.
        (4) Applicability of other provisions.--Notwithstanding section 
    902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
    2280), the cost of a project under this subsection, including any 
    modifications to the project, shall not exceed 150 percent of the 
    cost of such project set forth in paragraph (1).
    (d) Beneficial Use of Dredged Material.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary, substantially in accordance 
    with the restoration plan, shall implement in the coastal Louisiana 
    ecosystem a program for the beneficial use of material dredged from 
    federally maintained waterways at a total cost of $100,000,000.
        (2) Consideration.--In carrying out the program under paragraph 
    (1), the Secretary shall consider the beneficial use of sediment 
    from the Illinois River System for wetlands restoration in 
    wetlands-depleted watersheds of the coastal Louisiana ecosystem.
    (e) Additional Projects.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out the 
    following projects referred to in the restoration plan if the 
    Secretary determines such projects are feasible:
            (A) Land Bridge between Caillou Lake and the Gulf of Mexico 
        at a total cost of $56,300,000.
            (B) Gulf Shoreline at Point Au Fer Island at a total cost 
        of $43,400,000.
            (C) Modification of Caernarvon Diversion at a total cost of 
        $20,700,000.
            (D) Modification of Davis Pond Diversion at a total cost of 
        $64,200,000.
        (2) Reports.--Not later than December 31, 2009, the Secretary 
    shall submit feasibility reports on the projects described in 
    paragraph (1) to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
    of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment 
    and Public Works of the Senate.
        (3) Projects subject to reports.--
            (A) Feasibility reports.--Not later than December 31, 2008, 
        the Secretary shall submit to Congress feasibility reports on 
        the following projects referred to in the restoration plan:
                (i) Multipurpose Operation of Houma Navigation Lock at 
            a total cost of $18,100,000.
                (ii) Terrebonne Basin Barrier Shoreline Restoration at 
            a total cost of $124,600,000.
                (iii) Small Diversion at Convent/Blind River at a total 
            cost of $88,000,000.
                (iv) Amite River Diversion Canal Modification at a 
            total cost of $5,600,000.
                (v) Medium Diversion at White's Ditch at a total cost 
            of $86,100,000.
                (vi) Convey Atchafalaya River Water to Northern 
            Terrebonne Marshes at a total cost of $221,200,000.
            (B) Construction.--The Secretary may carry out the projects 
        under subparagraph (A) substantially in accordance with the 
        plans and subject to the conditions, recommended in a final 
        report of the Chief of Engineers if a favorable report of the 
        Chief is completed by not later than December 31, 2010.
        (4) Construction.--No appropriations shall be made to construct 
    any project under this subsection if the report under paragraph (2) 
    or paragraph (3), as the case may be, has not been approved by 
    resolutions adopted by the Committee on Transportation and 
    Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
    Environment and Public Works of the Senate.
SEC. 7007. NON-FEDERAL COST SHARE.
    (a) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with section 
221 of the Flood Control Act 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of a study or project under this title the 
cost of work carried out in the coastal Louisiana ecosystem by the non-
Federal interest for the project before the date of the execution of 
the partnership agreement for the study or project.
    (b) Sources of Funds.--The non-Federal interest may use, and the 
Secretary shall accept, funds provided by a Federal agency under any 
other Federal program, to satisfy, in whole or in part, the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the study or project if the Federal agency that 
provides the funds determines that the funds are authorized to be used 
to carry out the study or project.
    (c) Nongovernmental Organizations.--A nongovernmental organization 
shall be eligible to contribute all or a portion of the non-Federal 
share of the cost of a project under this title.
    (d) Treatment of Credit Between Projects.--Any credit provided 
under this section toward the non-Federal share of the cost of a study 
or project under this title may be applied toward the non-Federal share 
of the cost of any other study or project under this title.
    (e) Periodic Monitoring.--
        (1) In general.--To ensure that the contributions of the non-
    Federal interest equal the non-Federal share of the cost of a study 
    or project under this title during each 5-year period beginning 
    after the date of commencement of the first study or project under 
    this title, the Secretary shall--
            (A) monitor for each study or project under this title the 
        non-Federal provision of cash, in-kind services and materials, 
        and land, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and disposal 
        areas; and
            (B) manage the requirement of the non-Federal interest to 
        provide for each such study or project cash, in-kind services 
        and materials, and land, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, 
        and disposal areas.
        (2) Other monitoring.--The Secretary shall conduct monitoring 
    separately for the study phase, construction phase, preconstruction 
    engineering and design phase, and planning phase for each project 
    authorized on or after the date of enactment of this Act for all or 
    any portion of the coastal Louisiana ecosystem.
    (f) Audits.--Credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, 
relocations, and disposal areas (including land value and incidental 
costs) provided under this section, and the cost of work provided under 
this section, shall be subject to audit by the Secretary.
SEC. 7008. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION.
    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 209 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2) or any other provision of law, in 
carrying out any project or activity under this title or any other 
provision of law to protect, conserve, and restore the coastal 
Louisiana ecosystem, the Secretary may determine that--
        (1) the project or activity is justified by the environmental 
    benefits derived by the coastal Louisiana ecosystem; and
        (2) no further economic justification for the project or 
    activity shall be required if the Secretary determines that the 
    project or activity is cost effective.
    (b) Limitation on Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to 
any separable element of a project intended to produce benefits that 
are predominantly unrelated to the protection, preservation, and 
restoration of the coastal Louisiana ecosystem.
SEC. 7009. INDEPENDENT REVIEW.
    The Secretary shall establish a council, to be known as the 
``Louisiana Water Resources Council'', which shall serve as the 
exclusive peer review panel for activities conducted by the Corps of 
Engineers in the areas in the State of Louisiana declared as major 
disaster areas in accordance with section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford 
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) in 
response to Hurricane Katrina or Rita of 2005, in accordance with the 
requirements of section 2034.
SEC. 7010. EXPEDITED REPORTS.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall expedite completion of the 
reports for the following projects and, if the Secretary determines 
that a project is feasible, proceed directly to project preconstruction 
engineering and design:
        (1) The projects identified in the study of comprehensive 
    hurricane protection authorized by title I of the Energy and Water 
    Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2447).
        (2) The projects identified in the Southwest Coastal Louisiana 
    hurricane and storm damage reduction study authorized by the 
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
    Representatives on December 7, 2005.
    (b) Submission of Reports.--Upon completion of the reports 
identified in subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit the reports to 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives.
SEC. 7011. REPORTING.
    Not later than 6 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report, including a 
description of--
        (1) the projects authorized and undertaken under this title;
        (2) the construction status of the projects;
        (3) the cost to date and the expected final cost of each 
    project undertaken under this title; and
        (4) the benefits and environmental impacts of the projects.
SEC. 7012. NEW ORLEANS AND VICINITY.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to--
        (1) raise levee heights where necessary and otherwise enhance 
    the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity project and the West Bank and 
    Vicinity project to provide the level of protection necessary to 
    achieve the certification required for a 100-year level of flood 
    protection in accordance with the national flood insurance program 
    under the base flood elevations current at the time of construction 
    of the levee;
        (2) modify the 17th Street, Orleans Avenue, and London Avenue 
    drainage canals in the city of New Orleans and install pumps and 
    closure structures at or near the lakefront at Lake Pontchartrain;
        (3) armor critical elements of the New Orleans hurricane and 
    storm damage reduction system;
        (4) modify the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to increase the 
    reliability of the flood protection system for the city of New 
    Orleans;
        (5) replace or modify certain non-Federal levees in Plaquemines 
    Parish to incorporate the levees into the New Orleans to Venice 
    Hurricane Protection project;
        (6) reinforce or replace flood walls in the existing Lake 
    Pontchartrain and Vicinity project and the existing West Bank and 
    Vicinity project to improve performance of the flood and storm 
    damage reduction systems;
        (7) perform one time stormproofing of interior pump stations to 
    ensure the operability of the stations during hurricanes, storms, 
    and high water events;
        (8) repair, replace, modify and improve non-Federal levees and 
    associated protection measures in Terrebonne Parish; and
        (9) reduce the risk of storm damage to the greater New Orleans 
    metropolitan area by restoring the surrounding wetlands through 
    measures to begin to reverse wetland losses in areas affected by 
    navigation, oil and gas, and other channels and through 
    modification of the Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion structure or 
    its operations.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Activities authorized by subsection (a) and 
section 7013 shall be carried out in a manner that is consistent with 
the cost-sharing requirements specified in the Emergency Supplemental 
Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane 
Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109-234).
    (c) Conditions.--The Secretary shall notify the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate if 
estimates for the expenditure of funds on any single project or 
activity identified in subsection (a) exceeds the amount specified for 
that project or activity in the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations 
Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 
2006. No appropriation in excess of 25 percent above the amount 
specified for a project or activity in such Act may be made until an 
increase in the level of expenditure has been approved by resolutions 
adopted by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate.
SEC. 7013. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET.
    (a) Deauthorization.--
        (1) In general.--Effective beginning on the date of submission 
    of the plan required under paragraph (3), the navigation channel 
    portion of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet element of the project 
    for navigation, Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of 
    Mexico, authorized by the Act entitled ``An Act to authorize 
    construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf outlet'', approved March 
    29, 1956 (70 Stat. 65) and modified by section 844 of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4177) and section 326 
    of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3717), 
    which extends from the Gulf of Mexico to Mile 60 at the southern 
    bank of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, is not authorized.
        (2) Scope.--Nothing in this paragraph modifies or deauthorizes 
    the Inner Harbor navigation canal replacement project authorized by 
    that Act of March 29, 1956.
        (3) Closure and restoration plan.--
            (A) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives a final report on the deauthorization of the 
        Mississippi River-Gulf outlet, as described under the heading 
        ``Investigations'' under chapter 3 of title II of the Emergency 
        Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on 
        Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (120 Stat. 453).
            (B) Inclusions.--At a minimum, the report under 
        subparagraph (A) shall include--
                (i) a plan to physically modify the Mississippi River-
            Gulf Outlet and restore the areas affected by the 
            navigation channel;
                (ii) a plan to restore natural features of the 
            ecosystem that will reduce or prevent damage from storm 
            surge;
                (iii) a plan to prevent the intrusion of saltwater into 
            the waterway;
                (iv) efforts to integrate the recommendations of the 
            report with the program authorized under section 7003 and 
            the analysis and design authorized by title I of the Energy 
            and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 
            2247); and
                (v) consideration of--

                    (I) use of native vegetation; and
                    (II) diversions of fresh water to restore the Lake 
                Borgne ecosystem.

        (4) Construction.--The Secretary shall carry out a plan to 
    close the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet and restore and protect the 
    ecosystem substantially in accordance with the plan required under 
    paragraph (3), if the Secretary determines that the project is 
    cost-effective, environmentally acceptable, and technically 
    feasible.
SEC. 7014. HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION.
    (a) Reports.--With respect to the projects identified in the 
analysis and design of comprehensive hurricane protection authorized by 
title I of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 
(119 Stat. 2247), the Secretary shall submit, to the maximum extent 
practicable, specific project recommendations in a report developed 
under that title.
    (b) Emergency Procedures.--
        (1) In general.--If the President determines that a project 
    recommended in the analysis and design of comprehensive hurricane 
    protection under title I of the Energy and Water Development 
    Appropriations Act, 2006 could--
            (A) address an imminent threat to life and property;
            (B) prevent a dangerous storm surge from reaching a 
        populated area;
            (C) prevent the loss of coastal areas that reduce the 
        impact of storm surge;
            (D) benefit national energy security;
            (E) protect emergency hurricane evacuation routes or 
        shelters; or
            (F) address inconsistencies in hurricane protection 
        standards,
    the President may submit to the President pro tempore of the Senate 
    for authorization a legislative proposal relating to the project, 
    as the President determines to be appropriate.
        (2) Prioritization.--In submitting legislative proposals under 
    paragraph (1), the President shall give priority to any project 
    that, as determined by the President, would--
            (A) to the maximum extent practicable, reduce the risk--
                (i) of loss of human life;
                (ii) to public safety; and
                (iii) of damage to property; and
            (B) minimize costs and environmental impacts.
        (3) Expedited consideration.--
            (A) In general.--Beginning after December 31, 2008, any 
        legislative proposal submitted by the President under paragraph 
        (1) shall be eligible for expedited consideration in accordance 
        with this paragraph.
            (B) Introduction.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
        receipt of a legislative proposal under paragraph (1), the 
        Chairman of the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
        the Senate shall introduce the proposal as a bill, by request, 
        in the Senate.
            (C) Referral.--A bill introduced under subparagraph (B) 
        shall be referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate.
            (D) Committee consideration.--
                (i) In general.--Not later than 45 legislative days 
            after a bill under subparagraph (B) is referred to the 
            committee in accordance with subparagraph (C), the 
            committee shall act on the bill.
                (ii) Failure to act.--If the committee fails to act on 
            a bill by the date specified in clause (i), the bill shall 
            be discharged from the committee and placed on the calendar 
            of the Senate.
        (4) Effective date.--The requirements of, and authorities 
    under, this subsection shall expire on December 31, 2010.
SEC. 7015. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW.
    (a) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment 
and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report describing any 
modification required to the project for flood damage reduction, Larose 
to Golden Meadow, Louisiana, to provide the level of protection 
necessary to achieve the certification required for a 100-year level of 
flood protection in accordance with the national flood insurance 
program.
    (b) Modifications.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out a 
modification described in subsection (a) if--
        (1) the Secretary determines that the modification in the 
    report under subsection (a) is feasible; and
        (2) the total cost of the modification does not exceed 
    $90,000,000.
    (c) Requirement.--No appropriation shall be made to construct any 
modification under this section if the report under subsection (a) has 
not been approved by resolutions adopted by the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
SEC. 7016. LOWER JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a project for flood 
damage reduction in Lower Jefferson Parish, Louisiana.
    (b) Existing Studies.--In carrying out the project, the Secretary 
shall use, to the maximum extent practicable, existing studies for 
projects for flood damage reduction in the vicinity of Lower Jefferson 
Parish, Louisiana, prepared under section 205 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
    (c) Construction.--The Secretary may proceed to construction or 
complete the construction of projects in Lower Jefferson Parish if the 
projects are being developed or carried out under section 205 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1948 as of the date of enactment of this Act.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $100,000,000 to carry out this section.

   TITLE VIII--UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATER-WAY SYSTEM

SEC. 8001. DEFINITIONS.
    In this title, the following definitions apply:
        (1) Plan.--The term ``Plan'' means the project for navigation 
    and ecosystem improvements for the Upper Mississippi River and 
    Illinois Waterway System: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
    December 15, 2004.
        (2) Upper mississippi river and illinois waterway system.--The 
    term ``Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway System'' means 
    the projects for navigation and ecosystem restoration authorized by 
    Congress for--
            (A) the segment of the Mississippi River from the 
        confluence with the Ohio River, River Mile 0.0, to Upper St. 
        Anthony Falls Lock in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, River 
        Mile 854.0; and
            (B) the Illinois Waterway from its confluence with the 
        Mississippi River at Grafton, Illinois, River Mile 0.0, to T.J. 
        O'Brien Lock in Chicago, Illinois, River Mile 327.0.
SEC. 8002. NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS AND RESTORATION.
    Except as modified by this title, the Secretary shall undertake 
navigation improvements and restoration of the ecosystem for the Upper 
Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway System substantially in 
accordance with the Plan and subject to the conditions described 
therein.
SEC. 8003. AUTHORIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION OF NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS.
    (a) Small Scale and Nonstructural Measures.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall--
            (A) construct mooring facilities at Locks 12, 14, 18, 20, 
        22, 24, and LaGrange Lock or other alternative locations that 
        are economically and environmentally feasible;
            (B) provide switchboats at Locks 20 through 25; and
            (C) conduct development and testing of an appointment 
        scheduling system.
        (2) Authorization of appropriations.--The total cost of 
    projects authorized under this subsection shall be $256,000,000. 
    Such costs are to be paid half from amounts appropriated from the 
    general fund of the Treasury and half from amounts appropriated 
    from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Such sums shall remain 
    available until expended.
    (b) New Locks.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall construct new 1,200-foot 
    locks at Locks 20, 21, 22, 24, and 25 on the Upper Mississippi 
    River and at LaGrange Lock and Peoria Lock on the Illinois 
    Waterway.
        (2) Authorization of appropriations.--The total cost of 
    projects authorized under this subsection shall be $1,948,000,000. 
    Such costs are to be paid half from amounts appropriated from the 
    general fund of the Treasury and half from amounts appropriated 
    from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Such sums shall remain 
    available until expended.
    (c) Concurrence.--The mitigation required for the projects 
authorized under subsections (a) and (b), including any acquisition of 
lands or interests in lands, shall be undertaken or acquired 
concurrently with lands and interests in lands for the projects 
authorized under subsections (a) and (b), and physical construction 
required for the purposes of mitigation shall be undertaken 
concurrently with the physical construction of such projects.
SEC. 8004. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION AUTHORIZATION.
    (a) Operation.--To ensure the environmental sustainability of the 
existing Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway System, the 
Secretary shall modify, consistent with requirements to avoid adverse 
effects on navigation, the operation of the Upper Mississippi River and 
Illinois Waterway System to address the cumulative environmental 
impacts of operation of the system and improve the ecological integrity 
of the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois River.
    (b) Ecosystem Restoration Projects.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out, consistent with 
    requirements to avoid adverse effects on navigation, ecosystem 
    restoration projects to attain and maintain the sustainability of 
    the ecosystem of the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois River in 
    accordance with the general framework outlined in the Plan.
        (2) Projects included.--Ecosystem restoration projects may 
    include--
            (A) island building;
            (B) construction of fish passages;
            (C) floodplain restoration;
            (D) water level management (including water drawdown);
            (E) backwater restoration;
            (F) side channel restoration;
            (G) wing dam and dike restoration and modification;
            (H) island and shoreline protection;
            (I) topographical diversity;
            (J) dam point control;
            (K) use of dredged material for environmental purposes;
            (L) tributary confluence restoration;
            (M) spillway, dam, and levee modification to benefit the 
        environment; and
            (N) land and easement acquisition.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) 
        and (C), the Federal share of the cost of carrying out an 
        ecosystem restoration project under this subsection shall be 65 
        percent.
            (B) Exception for certain restoration projects.--In the 
        case of a project under this section for ecosystem restoration, 
        the Federal share of the cost of carrying out the project shall 
        be 100 percent if the project--
                (i) is located below the ordinary high water mark or in 
            a connected backwater;
                (ii) modifies the operation of structures for 
            navigation; or
                (iii) is located on federally owned land.
            (C) Savings clause.--Nothing in this subsection affects the 
        applicability of section 906(e) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(e)).
            (D) Nongovernmental organizations.--In accordance with 
        section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
        5b), for any project carried out under this title, a non-
        Federal sponsor may include a nonprofit entity, with the 
        consent of the affected local government.
        (4) Land acquisition.--The Secretary may acquire land or an 
    interest in land for an ecosystem restoration project from a 
    willing seller through conveyance of--
            (A) fee title to the land; or
            (B) a flood plain conservation easement.
    (c) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall carry out a long term resource 
monitoring, computerized data inventory and analysis, and applied 
research program for the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois River to 
determine trends in ecosystem health, to understand systemic changes, 
and to help identify restoration needs. The program shall consider and 
adopt the monitoring program established under section 
1103(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 652(e)(1)(A)(ii)).
    (d) Ecosystem Restoration Preconstruction Engineering and Design.--
        (1) Restoration design.--Before initiating the construction of 
    any individual ecosystem restoration project, the Secretary shall--
            (A) establish ecosystem restoration goals and identify 
        specific performance measures designed to demonstrate ecosystem 
        restoration;
            (B) establish the without-project condition or baseline for 
        each performance indicator; and
            (C) for each separable element of the ecosystem 
        restoration, identify specific target goals for each 
        performance indicator.
        (2) Outcomes.--Performance measures identified under paragraph 
    (1)(A) shall include specific measurable environmental outcomes, 
    such as changes in water quality, hydrology, or the well-being of 
    indicator species the population and distribution of which are 
    representative of the abundance and diversity of ecosystem-
    dependent aquatic and terrestrial species.
        (3) Restoration design.--Restoration design carried out as part 
    of ecosystem restoration shall include a monitoring plan for the 
    performance measures identified under paragraph (1)(A), including--
            (A) a timeline to achieve the identified target goals; and
            (B) a timeline for the demonstration of project completion.
    (e) Consultation and Funding Agreements.--
        (1) In general.--In carrying out the environmental 
    sustainability, ecosystem restoration, and monitoring activities 
    authorized in this section, the Secretary shall consult with the 
    Secretary of the Interior and the States of Illinois, Iowa, 
    Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin.
        (2) Funding agreements.--The Secretary is authorized to enter 
    into agreements with the Secretary of the Interior, the Upper 
    Mississippi River Basin Association, and natural resource and 
    conservation agencies of the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, 
    Missouri, and Wisconsin to provide for the direct participation of 
    and transfer of funds to such entities for the planning, 
    implementation, and evaluation of projects and programs established 
    by this section.
    (f) Specific Projects Authorization.--
        (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated to 
    carry out this subsection $1,717,000,000, of which not more than 
    $245,000,000 shall be available for projects described in 
    subsection (b)(2)(B) and not more than $48,000,000 shall be 
    available for projects described in subsection (b)(2)(J). Such sums 
    shall remain available until expended.
        (2) Limitation on available funds.--Of the amounts made 
    available under paragraph (1), not more than $35,000,000 in any 
    fiscal year may be used for land acquisition under subsection 
    (b)(4).
        (3) Individual project limit.--Other than for projects 
    described in subparagraphs (B) and (J) of subsection (b)(2), the 
    total cost of any single project carried out under this subsection 
    shall not exceed $25,000,000.
        (4) Monitoring.--In addition to amounts authorized under 
    paragraph (1), there are authorized $10,420,000 per fiscal year to 
    carry out the monitoring program under subsection (c) if such sums 
    are not appropriated pursuant to section 1103(e)(4) the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(4)).
    (g) Implementation Reports.--
        (1) In general.--Not later than June 30, 2009, and every 4 
    years thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
    Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
    Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
    an implementation report that--
            (A) includes baselines, milestones, goals, and priorities 
        for ecosystem restoration projects; and
            (B) measures the progress in meeting the goals.
        (2) Advisory panel.--
            (A) In general.--The Secretary shall appoint and convene an 
        advisory panel to provide independent guidance in the 
        development of each implementation report under paragraph (1).
            (B) Panel members.--Panel members shall include--
                (i) one representative of each of the State resource 
            agencies (or a designee of the Governor of the State) from 
            each of the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, 
            and Wisconsin;
                (ii) one representative of the Department of 
            Agriculture;
                (iii) one representative of the Department of 
            Transportation;
                (iv) one representative of the United States Geological 
            Survey;
                (v) one representative of the United States Fish and 
            Wildlife Service;
                (vi) one representative of the Environmental Protection 
            Agency;
                (vii) one representative of affected landowners;
                (viii) two representatives of conservation and 
            environmental advocacy groups; and
                (ix) two representatives of agriculture and industry 
            advocacy groups.
            (C) Chairperson.--The Secretary shall serve as chairperson 
        of the advisory panel.
            (D) Application of federal advisory committee act.--The 
        Advisory Panel and any working group established by the 
        Advisory Panel shall not be considered an advisory committee 
        under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).
    (h) Ranking System.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
    Advisory Panel, shall develop a system to rank proposed projects.
        (2) Priority.--The ranking system shall give greater weight to 
    projects that restore natural river processes, including those 
    projects listed in subsection (b)(2).
SEC. 8005. COMPARABLE PROGRESS.
    (a) In General.--As the Secretary conducts pre-engineering, design, 
and construction for projects authorized under this title, the 
Secretary shall--
        (1) select appropriate milestones;
        (2) determine, at the time of such selection, whether the 
    projects are being carried out at comparable rates; and
        (3) make an annual report to Congress, beginning in fiscal year 
    2009, regarding whether the projects are being carried out at a 
    comparable rate.
    (b) No Comparable Rate.--If the Secretary or Congress determines 
under subsection (a)(2) that projects authorized under this title are 
not moving toward completion at a comparable rate, annual funding 
requests for the projects shall be adjusted to ensure that the projects 
move toward completion at a comparable rate in the future.

                TITLE IX--NATIONAL LEVEE SAFETY PROGRAM

SEC. 9001. SHORT TITLE.
    This title may be cited as the ``National Levee Safety Act of 
2007''.
SEC. 9002. DEFINITIONS.
    In this title, the following definitions apply:
        (1) Committee.--The term ``committee'' means the Committee on 
    Levee Safety established by section 9003(a).
        (2) Inspection.--The term ``inspection'' means an actual 
    inspection of a levee--
            (A) to establish the global information system location of 
        the levee;
            (B) to determine the general condition of the levee; and
            (C) to estimate the number of structures and population at 
        risk and protected by the levee that would be adversely 
        impacted if the levee fails or water levels exceed the height 
        of the levee.
        (3) Levee.--
            (A) In general.--The term ``levee'' means an embankment, 
        including floodwalls--
                (i) the primary purpose of which is to provide 
            hurricane, storm, and flood protection relating to seasonal 
            high water, storm surges, precipitation, and other weather 
            events; and
                (ii) that normally is subject to water loading for only 
            a few days or weeks during a year.
            (B) Inclusion.--The term includes structures along canals 
        that constrain water flows and are subject to more frequent 
        water loadings but that do not constitute a barrier across a 
        watercourse.
        (4) State.--The term ``State'' means--
            (A) a State;
            (B) the District of Columbia;
            (C) the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and
            (D) any other territory or possession of the United States.
        (5) State levee safety agency.--The term ``State levee safety 
    agency'' means the agency of a State that has regulatory authority 
    over the safety of any non-Federal levee in the State.
        (6) United states.--The term ``United States'', when used in a 
    geographical sense, means all of the States.
SEC. 9003. COMMITTEE ON LEVEE SAFETY.
    (a) Establishment.--There is established a committee to be known as 
the ``Committee on Levee Safety''.
    (b) Membership.--The committee shall be composed of 16 members as 
follows:
        (1) The Secretary (or the Secretary's designee), who shall 
    serve as the chairperson of the Committee.
        (2) The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management 
    Agency (or the Administrator's designee).
        (3) The following 14 members appointed by the Secretary:
            (A) Eight representatives of State levee safety agencies, 
        one from each of the eight civil works divisions of the Corps 
        of Engineers.
            (B) Two representatives of the private sector who have 
        expertise in levee safety.
            (C) Two representatives of local and regional governmental 
        agencies who have expertise in levee safety.
            (D) Two representatives of Indian tribes who have expertise 
        in levee safety.
    (c) Duties.--
        (1) Development of recommendations for national levee safety 
    program.--The committee shall develop recomendations for a national 
    levee safety program, including a strategic plan for implementation 
    of the program.
        (2) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the committee shall submit to the Secretary, 
    the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
    Representatives, and the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
    of the Senate a report containing the recommendations developed 
    under paragraph (1).
    (d) Purposes.--In developing recommendations under subsection 
(c)(1), the committee shall ensure that the national levee safety 
program meets the following goals:
        (1) Ensuring the protection of human life and property by 
    levees through the development of technologically, economically, 
    socially, and environmentally feasible programs and procedures for 
    hazard reduction and mitigation relating to levees.
        (2) Encouraging use of the best available engineering policies 
    and procedures for levee site investigation, design, construction, 
    operation and maintenance, and emergency preparedness.
        (3) Encouraging the establishment and implementation of an 
    effective national levee safety program that may be delegated to 
    qualified States for implementation, including identification of 
    incentives and disincentives for State levee safety programs.
        (4) Ensuring that levees are operated and maintained in 
    accordance with appropriate and protective standards by conducting 
    an inventory and inspection of levees.
        (5) Developing and supporting public education and awareness 
    projects to increase public acceptance and support of State and 
    national levee safety programs.
        (6) Building public awareness of the residual risks associated 
    with living in levee protected areas.
        (7) Developing technical assistance materials for State and 
    national levee safety programs.
        (8) Developing methods to provide technical assistance relating 
    to levee safety to non-Federal entities.
        (9) Developing technical assistance materials, seminars, and 
    guidelines relating to the physical integrity of levees in the 
    United States.
    (e) Compensation of Members.--A member of the committee shall serve 
without compensation.
    (f) Travel Expenses.--To the extent amounts are made available in 
advance in appropriations Acts, the Secretary shall reimburse a member 
of the committee for travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of 
subsistence, at rates authorized for an employee of a Federal agency 
under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while 
away from the home or regular place of business of the member in 
performance of services for the committee.
    (g) Applicability of Federal Advisory Committee Act.--The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the 
committee.
SEC. 9004. INVENTORY AND INSPECTION OF LEVEES.
    (a) Levee Database.--
        (1) In general.--Not later than one year after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish and maintain a 
    database with an inventory of the Nation's levees.
        (2) Contents.--The database shall include--
            (A) location information of all Federal levees in the 
        Nation (including global information system information) and, 
        for non-Federal levees, such information on levee location as 
        is provided to the Secretary by State and local governmental 
        agencies;
            (B) utilizing such information as is available, the general 
        condition of each levee; and
            (C) an estimate of the number of structures and population 
        at risk and protected by each levee that would be adversely 
        impacted if the levee fails or water levels exceed the height 
        of the levee.
        (3) Availability of information.--
            (A) Availability to federal, state, and local governmental 
        agencies.--The Secretary shall make all of the information in 
        the database available to appropriate Federal, State, and local 
        governmental agencies.
            (B) Availability to the public.--The Secretary shall make 
        the information in the database described in paragraph (2)(A), 
        and such other information in the database as the Secretary 
        determines appropriate, available to the public.
    (b) Inventory and Inspection of Levees.--
        (1) Federal levees.--The Secretary, at Federal expense, shall 
    establish an inventory and conduct an inspection of all federally 
    owned and operated levees.
        (2) Federally constructed, nonfederally operated and maintained 
    levees.--The Secretary shall establish an inventory and conduct an 
    inspection of all federally constructed, non-federally operated and 
    maintained levees, at the original cost share for the project.
        (3) Participating levees.--For non-Federal levees the owners of 
    which are participating in the emergency response to natural 
    disasters program established under section 5 of the Act entitled 
    ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain public works on 
    rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', 
    approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n), the Secretary shall 
    establish an inventory and conduct an inspection of each such levee 
    if the owner of the levee requests such inspection. The Federal 
    share of the cost of an inspection under this paragraph shall be 65 
    percent.
SEC. 9005. LIMITATIONS ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.
    Nothing in this title shall be construed as--
        (1) creating any liability of the United States or its officers 
    or employees for the recovery of damages caused by an action or 
    failure to act; or
        (2) relieving an owner or operator of a levee of a legal duty, 
    obligation, or liability incident to the ownership or operation of 
    a levee.
SEC. 9006. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry 
out this title $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2013.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```