60082 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 29, 2010 / Notices 

3 If one of the above named companies does not 

qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of 

frozen fish fillets from the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam who have not qualified for a separate rate 

are deemed to be covered by this review as part of 

the single Vietnam entity of which the named 

exporters are a part. 

4 In the initiation notice that published on August 

31, 2010 (75 FR 53274), the Department 

inadvertently included the exporter name: SRF 

Limited, under case number A–583–837 for the 

period of review: 7/1/09–6/30/10. The Department 

did not receive a request to review SRF Limited for 

case number A–583–837, therefore, the Department 

retracts its initiation of an administrative review of 

the antidumping order with respect to SRF Limited 

for case number A–583–837 and for the period of 

review 7/1/09–6/30/10. 

5 If one of the above named companies does not 

qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of 

certain steel nails from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’) who have not qualified for a separate 

rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part 

of the single PRC entity of which the named 

exporters are a part. 

6 If the above named company does not qualify 

for a separate rate, all other exporters of floorstanding metal-top ironing tables from the PRC who 

have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to 

be covered by this review as part of the single PRC 

entity of which the named exporters are a part. 

7 If the above named company does not qualify 

for a separate rate, all other exporters of laminated 

woven sacks from the PRC who have not qualified 

for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this 

review as part of the single PRC entity of which the 

named exporters are a part. 

8 If the above named company does not qualify 

for a separate rate, all other exporters of lightwalled rectangular pipe and tubing from the PRC 

who have not qualified for a separate rate are 

deemed to be covered by this review as part of the 

single PRC entity of which the named exporters are 

a part. 

9 In the initiation notice that published on August 

31, 2010 (75 FR 53274), the company FMC 

Corporation was incorrectly initiated for case 

number A–570–847 for the POR 7/1/09–6/30/10. 

The Department retracts its initiation of an 

administrative review for FMC Corporation and 

initiates a review for the company listed above for 

Persulfates from the PRC (A–570–847). 

10 If one of the above named companies does not 

qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of 

polyethylene retail carrier bags from the PRC who 

have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to 

be covered by this review as part of the single PRC 

entity of which the named exporters are a part. 

Period to be 

reviewed 

Hyundai HYSCO .....................................................................................................................................................................

Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (POSCO) ...............................................................................................................................

The People’s Republic of china: Laminated Woven Sacks C–570–917 ...................................................................................... 1/1/09–12/31/09 

Zibo Aifudi Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd. ..................................................................................................................................

The People’s Republic of China: Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tubing C–570–915 ......................................................... 1/1/09–12/31/09 

Sun Group Co., Ltd. ...............................................................................................................................................................

Suspension Agreements 

None. 

During any administrative review 

covering all or part of a period falling 

between the first and second or third 

and fourth anniversary of the 

publication of an antidumping duty 

order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a 

determination under 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or 

suspended investigation (after sunset 

review), the Secretary, if requested by a 

domestic interested party within 30 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the review, will 

determine, consistent with FAG Italia v. 

United States, 291 F.3d 806 

(Fed Cir. 2002), as appropriate, whether 

antidumping duties have been absorbed 

by an exporter or producer subject to the 

review if the subject merchandise is 

sold in the United States through an 

importer that is affiliated with such 

exporter or producer. The request must 

include the name(s) of the exporter or 

producer for which the inquiry is 

requested. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the period of review. 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective orders in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On 

January 22, 2008, the Department 

published Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Documents Submission Procedures; 

APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 

22, 2008). Those procedures apply to 

administrative reviews included in this 

notice of initiation. Parties wishing to 

participate in any of these 

administrative reviews should ensure 

that the meet the requirements of these 

procedures (e.g., the filing of separate 

letters of appearance as discussed at 19 

CFR 351.103(d)). 

These initiations and this notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: September 23, 2010. 

Susan H. Kuhbach, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24462 Filed 9–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

Visiting Committee on Advanced 

Technology 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Visiting Committee on 

Advanced Technology (VCAT), National 

Institute of Standards and Technology 

(NIST), will meet Wednesday, October 

13, 2010, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. and 

Thursday, October 14, 2010, from 8:30 

a.m. to 2:30 p.m. The Visiting 

Committee on Advanced Technology is 

composed of fifteen members appointed 

by the Director of NIST who are eminent 

in such fields as business, research, new 

product development, engineering, 

labor, education, management 

consulting, environment, and 

international relations. 

DATES: The VCAT will meet on 

Wednesday, October 13, 2010 from 8:30 

a.m. to 5 p.m. and Thursday, October 

14, 2010, from 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in 

the Portrait Room, Administration 

Building, at NIST, Gaithersburg, 

Maryland. The rooms for the VCAT 

Breakout Groups will be announced at 

the meeting. Please note admittance 

instructions under the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION section of this notice. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephanie Shaw, Visiting Committee on 

Advanced Technology, National 

Institute of Standards and Technology, 

Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899–1060, 

telephone number (301) 975–2667. 

Ms. Shaw’s e-mail address is 

stephanie.shaw@nist.gov. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 29, 2010 / Notices 60083 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 278. 

The purpose of this meeting is to 

review and make recommendations 

regarding general policy for the 

Institute, its organization, its budget, 

and its programs within the framework 

of applicable national policies as set 

forth by the President and the Congress. 

The first day’s agenda will include an 

update on NIST; presentations on NIST 

proposed performance evaluation 

framework and example 

implementations for NIST calibration 

services and Standard Reference 

Materials; and a presentation on the 

Administration’s Priorities on 

Innovation by Mr. Aneesh Chopra, Chief 

Technology Officer and Associate 

Director for Technology, Office of 

Science and Technology Policy. Three 

concurrent breakout groups will be 

convened in which NIST Division 

Chiefs will provide information on 

selected NIST measurement services to 

the VCAT members. The first day will 

conclude with the VCAT discussion on 

NIST measurement services planning 

and management. On the second day, 

the meeting will focus on measurement 

and standards needs in forensic sciences 

including external perspectives from 

guest speakers and an overview and 

examples of forensic science activities at 

NIST. Other topics include a discussion 

on the initial outputs of the Blue Ribbon 

Commission II Safety Management; an 

update on external needs assessment 

activities, and a wrap-up discussion, 

recommendations, and plans for the 

2010 VCAT Annual Report. The agenda 

may change to accommodate Committee 

business. The final agenda will be 

posted on the NIST Web site at http:// 

www.nist.gov/director/vcat/agenda.htm. 

Individuals and representatives of 

organizations who would like to offer 

comments and suggestions related to the 

Committee’s affairs are invited to 

request a place on the agenda. On 

October 13, 2010, approximately onehalf hour will be reserved in the 

afternoon for public comments, and 

speaking times will be assigned on a 

first-come, first-serve basis. The amount 

of time per speaker will be determined 

by the number of requests received, but 

is likely to be about 3 minutes each. The 

exact time for public comments will be 

included in the final agenda that will be 

posted on the NIST Web site at http:// 

www.nist.gov/director/vcat/agenda.htm. 

Questions from the public will not be 

considered during this period. Speakers 

who wish to expand upon their oral 

statements, those who had wished to 

speak but could not be accommodated 

on the agenda, and those who were 

unable to attend in person are invited to 

submit written statements to the VCAT, 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, MS 

1060, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, via 

fax at 301–216–0529 or electronically by 

e-mail to gail.ehrlich@nist.gov. 

All visitors to the NIST site will have 

to pre-register to be admitted. Please 

submit your name, time of arrival, 

e-mail address and phone number to 

Stephanie Shaw no later than Friday, 

October 8, 2010, and she will provide 

you with instructions for admittance. 

Ms. Shaw’s e-mail address is 

stephanie.shaw@nist.gov and her phone 

number is (301) 975–2667. 

Dated: September 27, 2010. 

David Robinson, 

Associate Director for Management 

Resources. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24579 Filed 9–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Economic Development Administration 

Notice of Petitions by Firms for 

Determination of Eligibility To Apply 

for Trade Adjustment Assistance 

AGENCY: Economic Development 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice and Opportunity for 

Public Comment. 

Pursuant to Section 251 of the Trade 

Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2341 

et seq.), the Economic Development 

Administration (EDA) has received 

petitions for certification of eligibility to 

apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance 

from the firms listed below. 

Accordingly, EDA has initiated 

investigations to determine whether 

increased imports into the United States 

of articles like or directly competitive 

with those produced by each of these 

firms contributed importantly to the 

total or partial separation of the firm’s 

workers, or threat thereof, and to a 

decrease in sales or production of each 

petitioning firm. 

LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE 

ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE 

[9/16/2010 through 9/23/2010] 

Firm name Address 

Date 

accepted for 

investigation 

Products 

Custom Cable Crafters of 

Missouri, Inc..

30 Shakertown Hall Lane, Perryville, MO 63775– 

9796.

9/23/10 The firm manufactures telecommunications assemblies in both copper and 

fiber optics. 

ECRM, Inc. ...................... 554 Clark Road, Tewksbury, MA 01876 ................. 9/17/10 The firm designs, manufactures, markets 

and services high-resolution imaging 

systems. 

Gunnebo Johnson Corporation.1240 N. Harvard Street, Tulsa, OK 74115 .............. 9/16/10 The firm manufactures pulley blocks, 

flywheels, and snatch blocks. 

Melron Corporation .......... 8110 Technology Drive, Schofield, WI 54476–4523 9/23/10 The firm manufacturers cast architectural 

metal hardware for the window manufacturing industry. 

Mize and Co., Inc. ........... 2020 N. Koch Industrial Avenue, Kingman, KS 

67068–0516.

9/20/10 The firm manufactures wire harnesses, 

bulk wire, welding cable, electric terminals, trailer lights, jumper cables using 

various wires, plastics, and rubber and 

metal components. 

Niche Electronics Technologies, Inc..201 Dykeman Road, Shippensburg, PA 17257 ...... 9/20/10 The firm manufactures printed circuit assemblies. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES