alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### M. S. Austin v. S. McMahan.

(No. 1840.)

Appeal from Kaufman County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 429. *Appeal bond from justice’s to county court; sufficient description of judgment in; case stated.*McMahan brought suit in justice’s court against Austin to recover a mare valued at $75; also the use and hire of the same, *378$65; also damages for the wrongful seizure and conversion of the same. He recovered a verdict and judgment for the mare, or, in case she could not he had, for her value, $75, and also, for $34 damages for the wrongful conversion. Austin appealed to the county court. His appeal was dismissed upon the ground that his appeal bond misdescribed the judgment. The bond described the judgment as one for $109, saying nothing about the recovery of the mare. Otherwise the description of the judgment was full and correct. *Held,*it was error to dismiss the appeal. It cannot be said that the judgment was misdescribed. It was not perhaps as fully described as it might have been, still it was described with substantial accuracy and sufficient certainty. [W. & W. Con. Rep. §§ 407, 410, 846, 1236; *ante,*§§ 26, 77, 111.]

November 12, 1884.

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1570 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1570

To provide compensation for certain World War II veterans who survived 
    the Bataan Death March and were held as prisoners of war by the 
                               Japanese.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2007

   Mr. Mica introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide compensation for certain World War II veterans who survived 
    the Bataan Death March and were held as prisoners of war by the 
                               Japanese.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Samuel B. Moody Bataan Death March 
Compensation Act''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT TO WORLD WAR II VETERANS WHO SURVIVED THE BATAAN DEATH 
              MARCH.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the military department concerned 
shall pay, upon request, to an individual described in subsection (b) 
the amount determined with respect to that individual under subsection 
(c).
    (b) Covered Individuals.--A payment under subsection (a) shall be 
made to any individual who as a member of the Armed Forces during World 
War II--
            (1) was captured on the peninsula of Bataan or island of 
        Corregidor in the territory of the Philippines by Japanese 
        forces; and
            (2) participated in and survived the Bataan Death March.
    (c) Amount To Be Paid.--The amount of a payment under subsection 
(a) to an individual shall be $4 for each day during which the 
individual was held in captivity by Japanese forces during World War 
II, compounded annually at a 3 percent annual rate of interest.
    (d) Payment to Survivors.--In the case of an individual described 
in subsection (b) who is deceased, payment under this section with 
respect to that individual shall be made to that individual's nearest 
surviving relative, as determined by the Secretary concerned.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (SEC File Nos. 333-59307, 333-350660,333-67520 and 333-108868) and on Form S-3 (SEC File Nos. 333-60552 and 333-71940) of our report dated November 3, 2004, relating to the financial statements of Notify Technology Corporation for the year ended September 30, 2004, whichappears in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. 

 

/s/    Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP 

 

Palo Alto, California 

December 21, 2005
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas L. Saeli, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-K of Noble International, Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



|                     |  |        |  |                                                                                   
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2007 |  | By:    |  | /s/    THOMAS L.
SAELI                                                            
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Thomas L. Saeli                                                                   
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of Noble International, Ltd.
#### Kenneth DUPLECHAIN, et al. v. Firooz JALILI, et al.

No. 2011-C-0087.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2011.

In re Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 2006-3905-C; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-736.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant.
<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 21.1

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of Subsidiary                                  State or Jurisdiction of Incorporation
------------------                                  --------------------------------------
<S>                                                <C>
3013439 Nova Scotia Company                         Nova Scotia, Canada
504087 N.B. Inc.                                    New Brunswick, Canada
COS Information, Inc.                               Quebec, Canada
Electronic Imaging Services, Inc.                   Delaware
Lirpaco, Inc.                                       Canadian (Federal)
Vestcom Ontario                                     Ontario, Canada
Vestcom Connecticut, Inc.                           Connecticut
Vestcom Investments, Inc.                           New Jersey
Vestcom Internet Solutions Group, Inc.              New Jersey
Vestcom Massachusetts, Inc.                         Massachusetts
Vestcom Mid-Atlantic, Inc.                          Delaware
Vestcom New England, Inc.                           Rhode Island
Vestcom Northwest, Inc.                             Delaware
Vestcom Retail Solutions Group, Inc.                Missouri
Vestcom Rhode Island Corp.                          Rhode Island
Vestcom St. Louis, Inc.                             Delaware
Vestcom Wisconsin, Inc.                             Wisconsin
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 190 (Friday, October 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60830-60831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24613]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Surrender of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, under

[[Page 60831]]

Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small Business 
Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to function as a 
small business investment company under the Small business Investment 
Company License No. 02/72-0616 issued to Rock Maple Ventures, L.P., and 
said license is hereby declared null and void as of August 4, 2010.

United States Small Business Administration.
Sean J. Greene,
AA/Investment, United States Small Business Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-24613 Filed 9-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 21.1


              SUBSIDIARIES OF SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

 1. Summit Management Company, a Maryland corporation
 2. Stony Point/Summit Limited Partnership, a Virginia limited partnership
 3. Summit/Belmont Limited Partnership, a Virginia limited partnership
 4. Hampton/McGuire Limited Partnership, a Florida limited partnership
 5. Henderson/McGuire Partners (Limited Partnership), a Delaware limited
    partnership
 6. McGregor/McGuire Limited Partnership, a Florida limited partnership
 7. Summit American Associates, a Florida limited partnership
 8. Portofino Place, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership
 9. Sand Lake Joint Venture, a Florida general partnership
10. Foxcroft East Associates, a North Carolina limited partnership
11. Summit Stonefield, LLC, a Pensylvania limited liability company
12. Summit Southwest, L.P., a Delware limited partnership
News United States Air Force
 Alaska Air Guardsmen rescue three stranded near glacierPublished March 31, 2016
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. N. Alicia Halla
                        
                        
                        176th Wing Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON, Alaska (AFNS)  --**
                Airmen with the Alaska Air National Guard’s 210th, 211th and 212th Rescue Squadrons saved three individuals near the Marcus Baker Glacier on the night of March 29.According to the Alaska Rescue Coordination Center, the individuals were scouting a landing area in a Piper PA-12 Super Cruiser, but could not take off again because something broke on the aircraft.The pilot and passengers were uninjured. However, they were equipped with a spot beacon and one sleeping bag for survival gear, according to the Alaska RCC.They weren’t as prepared as they needed to be for the weather at that altitude, according to Capt. John Romspert, a member of the Alaska RCC.Upon notification by the Alaska State Troopers, Air National Guard assets were requested for the mission, including an HH-60 Pave Hawk helicopter from the 210th RQS and an HC-130 King from the 211th RQS. The HH-60 took a two-man Guardian Angel team, and one Guardian Angel was on board the HC-130.Guardian Angel teams are highly trained medical personnel made of pararescuemen and/or combat rescue officers who specialize in conducting high-risk rescue missions.Due to the altitude of the glacier, the HH-60 pilot needed as little weight, including fuel, as possible. The rescue crew picked up the individuals and refueled in-air on the way to the Palmer airport, where they were released to the Alaska State Troopers.For this mission, the 210th, 211th and 212th Rescue Squadrons were awarded with three saves.rescue 



guard 



Alaska 



RQS 



PACAF 



Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson
#### STATE of Louisiana v. George Jameson GRAY III.

No. 2011-K-0707.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

In re Gray III, George Jameson; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 9935-07; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-861.

Denied.
#### B.W. GREEMON v. CITY OF BOSSIER CITY, Louisiana and the Bossier City Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board.

No. 2010-C-2828.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

In re Bossier City, City of et al.; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Mandamus and/or Writ of Prohibition, Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 126,232; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,664-CA.

Granted.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Vedo L. GUILLORY.

No. 2011-KK-0034.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 6, 2011.

In re Guillory, Vedo L.; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 28438-09; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW 10-01425.

Stay denied; writ denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, being, Cornelis F. Wit, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|                                               
|/s/ Cornelis F. Wit                            
|Cornelis F. Wit                                
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

March 31, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 59697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24309]



[[Page 59697]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


National Sea Grant Advisory Board

AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a 
forthcoming meeting of the Sea Grant Advisory Board (Board). Board 
members will discuss and provide advice on the National Sea Grant 
College Program in the areas of program evaluation, strategic planning, 
education and extension, science and technology programs, and other 
matters as described in the agenda found on the National Sea Grant 
College Program Web site at http://www.seagrant.noaa.gov/leadership/advisory_board.html.

DATES: The announced meeting is scheduled for Saturday, October 16--
Sunday October 17, 2010.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at The Astor Crowne Plaza Hotel, 
739 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA 70130.
    Status: The meeting will be open to public participation with a 15-
minute public comment period on October 17 at 2:45 p.m. CDT (check Web 
site to confirm time.) The Board expects that public statements 
presented at its meetings will not be repetitive of previously 
submitted verbal or written statements. In general, each individual or 
group making a verbal presentation will be limited to a total time of 
three (3) minutes. Written comments should be received by the 
Designated Federal Officer by October 8, 2010 to provide sufficient 
time for Board review. Written comments received after October 8, 2010, 
will be distributed to the Board, but may not be reviewed prior to the 
meeting date. Seats will be available on a first-come, first-served 
basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Elizabeth Ban, Designated Federal 
Officer, National Sea Grant College Program, National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 11843, Silver 
Spring, Maryland 20910, (301) 734-1082.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board, which consists of a balanced 
representation from academia, industry, state government and citizens 
groups, was established in 1976 by Section 209 of the Sea Grant 
Improvement Act (Pub. L. 94-461, 33 U.S.C. 1128). The Board advises the 
Secretary of Commerce and the Director of the National Sea Grant 
College Program with respect to operations under the Act, and such 
other matters as the Secretary refers to them for review and advice.
    The agenda for this meeting can be found at http://www.seagrant.noaa.gov/leadership/advisory_board.html.

    Dated: September 22, 2010.
Mark E. Brown,
Chief Financial Officer, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-24309 Filed 9-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-KA-P
exhibit10-1.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    PNG
VENTURES, INC.

    5310
Harvest Hill Road, Suite 229

    Dallas,
TX 75320

    


    December
22, 2008

    


    


    BY
FACSIMILE (212/759-0091)

    Fourth
Third LLC

    3785 Park
Avenue, Suite 3304

    New York,
NY 10152

    Attn.:
Brian J. Cavanagh, CFO

    


    RE:  Master
Rights Agreement, made and entered into as of the 26th date of
June, 2008

    by and among PNG Ventures, Inc. (“PNG”)
and Fourth Third LLC (“Fourth Third”)

    


    Ladies
and Gentlemen:

    


    The
purpose of this letter is to confirm our understanding regarding certain
provisions of the referenced Master Rights Agreement (the
“Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used herein, and not otherwise
defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the
Agreement.

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              1.

            	
              The
      parties hereto agree that the term “Price Determination Date” shall be
      amended and restated in its entirety to read as
  follows:

            


    

    


    “Price Determination
Date” means the date that is the earliest to occur of (i) the closing of
a PIPE Offering, (ii) the date that the indebtedness under the Credit Agreement
is reduced to $30,000,000 or below, (iii) April 1, 2009, (iv) the date that a
Registration Statement with respect to the Shares is declared effective, or (v)
the date that the date that the last of the indebtedness of the Company in favor
of Black Forest International LLC. is repaid or discharged.

    


    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              2.

            	
              The
      address for notices to PNG shall be amended to be the
      following:

            


    

    


    PNG
VENTURES, INC.

    5310
Harvest Hill Road, Suite 229

    Dallas,
TX 75320

    Attn.:  Kevin
Markey, CEO

    Facsimile:
(214) 634-6276

    


    With a
copy to:

    


    Sichenia
Ross Friedman Ference LLP

    61
Broadway, 32nd
Floor

    New York,
NY 10006

    Attn.:  Gregory
Sichenzia, Esq.

    Facsimile:  (212)
930-9725

    Email: gsichenzia@srff.com


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    3.           The
provisions hereof shall be effective as of December 19, 2008.

    


    Except as
hereinabove provided, the provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.

    


    


    PNG
VENTURES, INC.

    


    /s/ Kevin W.
Markey

    Name:
Kevin W. Markey

    Title:  CEO

    


    


    FOURTH
THIRD LLC

    


    /s/ Seth B.
Taube

    Name:
Seth B. Taube

    Title:
Authorized Signatory
#### ORRILL, CORDELL & BEARY, LLC v. Gary Barkley ROTH.

No. 2012-CC-0545.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Roth, Gary Barkley; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div K-5, No. 2008-11308; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2012-C-0062.

Denied.
#### Pablo MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC, Appellees.

No. 3D10-2581.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 17, 2011.

Anthony P. Carbone, for appellant.

*1091Akerman Senterfitt, and Katherine E. Giddings, Nancy M. Wallace, Tallahassee, and William P. Heller, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Before RAMIREZ, SUAREZ, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.

RAMIREZ, J.

*ON MOTION TO DISMISS*

Aurora Loan Services, LLC moved to dismiss this appeal based on an order denying Pablo Martinez’s post-judgment motion to quash service of process rendered on August 27, 2010, and the denial of his motion for rehearing rendered on September 24, 2010. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Martinez filed his notice of appeal on October 1, 2010. We previously have stated that a trial court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a motion for rehearing of an order denying a motion to set aside default judgment because motions for rehearing of orders issued under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) are not authorized. *See Drak, L.L.C. v. Salcines Dev., Inc., 5*So.3d 713 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); *Francisco v. Victoria Marine Shipping, Inc.,*486 So.2d 1386, 1391 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (stating that an order entered under rule 1.540 does not rise to the level of a judgment and therefore, a trial court lacks authority to entertain a motion for rehearing from such an order). Thus, the motion for rehearing was not authorized and did not toll the time for filing the notice of appeal which should have been filed within thirty days of the August 27 order. Because the notice of appeal was untimely filed, we lack jurisdiction and therefore grant the motion to dismiss.

Dismissed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,513-02

EX PARTE JOHN ANTHONY VALENTI, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2009CR0231-W3

IN THE 437 DISTRICT COURT FROM BEXAR COUNTY TH

Per curiam. Yeary, J. not participating.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to two counts of

online solicitation of a minor and was sentenced to one hundred and eighty days’ imprisonment for

each count . He did not appeal his conviction. 1

This Court, in Ex parte Lo, held unconstitutional the online solicitation of a minor statute for

which Applicant was convicted. Ex parte Lo, 424 S.W.3d 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Applicant

 He has a third count, for which he received probation, that is not being challenged with 1

this application.
2

filed this habeas application based on the Lo decision and asks that his conviction be set aside. The

State recommends that relief be granted in this cause. We agree. 

Relief is granted. The judgments in counts two and three of Cause No. 2009CR0231 in the

437 District Court of Bexar County is set aside and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the th

Sheriff of Bexar County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment so that the indictment may

be disposed of in accordance with this Court’s opinion in Ex parte Lo. The trial court shall issue any

necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: June 22, 2016

Do not publish