alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which                           ( print page 60468)                        would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Cancer Metastasis.                    

*Date:*                         October 4, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         12:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Hotel on Capitol Hill, 400 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20001.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Syed M Quadri, PhD,  Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6210, MSC 7804, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-435-1211.                         *quadris@csr.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 24, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-24550 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 186 (Monday, September 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 59276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24142]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Translational Programs in Lung Diseases.
    Date: October 14-15, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel Bethesda (Formerly Holiday Inn Select), 
8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Shelley S. Sehnert, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7206, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 
301-435-0303, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f3c3c2a27212a3d3b0f2127232d266121262761282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86f5f5e3eee8e3f4f2c6e8eeeae4efa8e8efeea8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Mentored Scientist Awards.
    Date: October 14-15, 2010.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel Bethesda (Formerly Holiday Inn Select), 
8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Holly K. Krull, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 7188, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0280, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0dbc2c5dcdcd8f0ded8dcd2d99eded9d89ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="036871766f6f6b436d6b6f616a2d6d6a6b2d646c75">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 21, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-24142 Filed 9-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Tex. & Pac. R’y Co. v. N. A. Talley.

(No. 3360.)

Appeal from Dallas County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§765." *Illegal evidence not cause for reversal, when; case stated.*Appellee sued appellant to recover damages for delay in the delivery of two lots of fruit trees shipped by him over appellant’s line of railway, one lot shipped from Dallas to Hillsboro, an.d another from De Kalb to Dallas, Texas. He recovered judgment for damages and costs. On the trial the court, over appellant’s objections, permitted appellee to testify that the fruit trees he had shipped to Hillsboro were trees he had sold to parties in that vicinity, and that, if the trees had reached there within a reasonable time after shipment, said parties would have taken them according to contract. *Held:*This evidence was hearsay, and therefore inadmissible. But the admission of incompetent evidence is not always ground for reversal. It is not ground for reversal, ordinarily, Where the case is made out independently of the objectionable evidence. [Morris v. Runnells, 12 Tex. 176.] Nor is the admission of immaterial evidence, not calculated to mislead, ground for reversal. [Titus v. Johnson, 50 Tex. 225.] In this case there is sufficient evidence, independent of appellee’s statement, to show that the purchasers of the trees would have taken them had they arrived on time.

*672May 13, 1885.

§ 766. *Damage for delay in delivering goods; evidence as to, held sufficient.*When the trees shipped to Hillsboro reached there, the purchasers refused to take them, because of the delay in their arrival. Appellee finally sold them at the best price he could obtain for them, and the loss was $121.10. When appellee shipped these trees he notified the agent of appellant, who received them for shipment, fully of his contract with the purchasers at Hillsboro; and that if the trees did not reach there by a certain time, they would be a total loss to him, as the purchasers would not take them after that date. With regard to the trees shipped from He Kalb to Hallas, the preponderance of the evidence is, that they were frozen and killed *in transit.*They were in good order when shipped. It is sufficiently manifest that the _loss of these trees resulted from the negligence of appellant’s employees while they were *en route.*The evidence amply sustains the verdict and judgment.

Affirmed.
#### Gerard MENDONCA v. TIDEWATER, INC.

No. 2011-C-2333.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re Mendonca, Gerard; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. L, No. 2002-4522; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-CA-0318.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Joseph J. BRITTON, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-1744.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Britton Jr., Joseph J.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedí*1266al Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 93-5014; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 10-KH 194, 09-WR-558.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael BUSHNELL, Sr.

No. 2012-KO-0036.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

*1269In re Bushnell Sr., Michael; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Evangeline, Div. A, No. 78262-F; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 11-594.

Denied.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-60647

Summary Calendar

 

LARRY STEPHEN PERRY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MARK MILLER,

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:95-CV-126

- - - - - - - - - -

March 12, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry Stephen Perry appeals the district court's dismissal

of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. The district

court dismissed his action for failure to prosecute under Fed.

R. Civ. P. 41(b) and ordered that Perry pay monetary sanctions

for Perry's failure to comply with local rules. The district

court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action

without prejudice for failure to prosecute or in imposing

monetary sanctions for Perry's failure to comply with local

rules. McCullough v. Lynaugh, 835 F.2d 1126, 1127 (5th Cir. 
No. 95-60647

-2-

1988); see United States v. Wilkes, 20 F.3d 651, 653 (5th Cir.

1994).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1197]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

    THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE NORTHERN CENTRAL NEW YORK VOLUNTEER 
                         FIREMEN'S ASSOCIATION

                                 ______

                     HON. LOUISE McINTOSH SLAUGHTER

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, June 7, 1995
  Ms. SLAUGHTER. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to the 
village of Fairport's firefighters for hosting the 100th Anniversary 
Convention of the Northern Central New York Volunteer Firemen's 
Association. The Northern Central Volunteers have provided an 
invaluable service not only to volunteer firefighters throughout 
upstate New York, but also to the many people whose lives they have 
protected. I am pleased that my home village of Fairport is playing 
such a significant role by hosting this important event.
  The Northern Central New York Firemen's Association was created in 
1895 when William Weedsport and a few other volunteer firefighters 
between Rochester and Syracuse met to discuss issues relative to 
firefighters in their region. Since then, they have been a local 
adjunct to the Fire Association of New York State. The Northern Central 
New York Volunteer Firemen's Association has worked very closely with 
its State association to promote and protect the interests of firemen 
for the past 100 years.
  The Northern Central delegation's contribution to the history of 
firefighters in New York State has been immeasurable. Three of the 
presidents of the Firemen's Association of New York State and one 
president-elect have come from the Northern Central Association in the 
past 15 years. Several of the Northern Central Volunteers have also 
served as trustees and presidents for the Firemen's Home in Hudson, NY.
  The Rochester delegation of the Northern Central Volunteers also has 
a long history of leadership. After the Second World War, the Northern 
Central volunteers grew in membership and geographical area. Seneca, 
Ontario, Oswego, Steuben, and Yates Counties were added to the existent 
membership in Cayuga, Monroe, Onondaga and Wayne Counties. Sam Pitcher 
of Fairport, Joey Kuhn of Penfield and Lavern Barrett of Lyons were 
instrumental in adapting the Northern Central Firemen's Association to 
this dramatic growth. By writing a new constitution, creating new 
committees such as the Public Relations Committees, establishing new 
honors such as the Fireman of the Year Award, and launching new 
program's such as the Ladies Day Program, they and all of the members 
since 1895 have helped carry the Northern Central volunteer firemen 
into the 21st century.
  Mr. Speaker, we should all be thankful for the courage and commitment 
to the safety of the people of New York State that the Northern Central 
volunteer firemen have displayed over the past 100 years. Please join 
me in saluting their service to our Nation.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations included in
           the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and
           is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial
           Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                         <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<CASH>                                            2,763
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    37,675
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              6,080,398
<PP&E>                                          527,021
<DEPRECIATION>                                  131,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                6,080,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         2,175,195
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                      7,122,414
<OTHER-SE>                                   (3,217,211)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  6,080,398
<SALES>                                          37,956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                736,701
<CGS>                                            26,152
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    26,152
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              2,257,626
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              679,402
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1,916,050)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1,916,050)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,923,516)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    ($0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    ($0.48)


</TABLE>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000570 17-APR-2019 08:08 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                            1,938,758
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       334,791
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                         360,528
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,728,576
<PP&E>                              325,967
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    3,956,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,120,895
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                         13,712,572
<OTHER-SE>                      (10,876,940)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      3,956,527
<SALES>                           1,560,484
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  1,560,484
<CGS>                               377,834
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       377,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  2,118,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (936,258)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (936,258)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (936,258)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.15)
        


</TABLE>
#### Charles ARMSTRONG, Appellant, v. Johnathan FORD; Nathaniel Murdock; Midland Manors, Appellees.

No. 00-3625.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 22, 2000.

Filed Jan. 5, 2001.

Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his pro se civil rights complaint against private-party defendants. After careful review of the record, we conclude that Mr. Armstrong’s complaint was frivolous and failed to state a claim. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)®, (ii); Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2), (e)(1); *Bray v.*
      *561
      *Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic,*506 U.S. 263, 267-68, 113 S.Ct. 753, 122 L.Ed.2d 34 (1993); *West v. Atkins,*487 U.S. 42, 48, 108 S.Ct. 2250, 101 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988); *Johnson v. Outboard Marine Corp.,*172 F.3d 531, 536 (8th Cir.1999). Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

. The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
#### STATE ex rel. Joel R. PEDELAHORE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0406.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Pedelahore, Joel R.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 337852; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 2007.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. Cf. La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A); La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D).
#### Ex parte James E. PRINCE, Jr. (In re James E. Prince, Jr. v. State Department of Revenue).

1091146.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 6, 2010.

Jeff Patterson, Montgomery; and Richard C. Litwin of The Litwin Law Firm, P.C., Atlanta, Georgia, for petitioner.

Submitted on petitioner’s brief only.

LYONS, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. *Horsley v. Horsley,*291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

COBB, C.J., and STUART, BOLIN, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.
#### STATE ex rel. Javar JOHNSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-1488.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Johnson, Javar; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. John, 40th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 99-31; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KH-141.

Denied.
Charter of the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors



 Exhibit 10.43 
  
 BJ SERVICES COMPANY 
 CHARTER OF THE NOMINATING AND 
 GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE OF THE 
 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 
  
 This Charter documents the composition, duties and responsibilities of the Nominating and Governance Committee (the “Committee”). This Charter
has been adopted by the Board. 
  
 COMPOSITION 
  
 The Committee shall be elected by the Board and shall be comprised of not
fewer than three non-employee Directors who are independent (as defined by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange). 
  
 PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES 
  
 The primary functions of the Committee are: 
  

	 	•	To identify individuals qualified to become board members, consistent with criteria approved by the Board, and recommend to the Board the slate of director nominees to be proposed
by the Board for the next annual meeting of shareholders, and any director nominees to be elected by the Board; 

  

	 	•	To recommend directors to be selected for membership on the various Board committees; 

  

	 	•	To establish the criteria for Board membership; 

  

	 	•	In its search for suitable Board candidates, as the need arises to nominate new candidates, to make efforts to ensure that women and persons from minority racial groups are among
those it considers for nomination to the Board. 

  
 Governance related matters: 
  

	 	•	Making recommendations to the Board regarding the responsibilities, organization (including size) and membership of all Board committees; 

  

	 	•	Director policies: retirement (e.g., term limit or age cap); and indemnification issues; and 

  

	 	•	Develop and recommend to the full Board corporate governance principles and guidelines. 

  

	 	•	Oversee the evaluation of the Board and management. 

  
 The Committee shall keep the full Board informed of the results of its periodic reviews. 
  
 The Committee shall conduct an annual performance self-evaluation of the Committee.