alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,042,625
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,756,132
<PP&E>                                       9,548,952
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,261,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,558,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,127,493
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,578
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,393,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,558,101
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,600,084
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             180,490
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,685,444)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,685,444)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,685,444)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)


</TABLE>
Order filed, May 14, 2018.

 In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

____________

NO. 01-18-00343-CV

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellant

V.

PARK AT WESTCREEK, LP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case 2016-32867

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due 05/10/2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. 

The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has 

not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we 

issue the following order.

We order, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record in this appeal, 

if any, within 10 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
#### Spencer Wright v. Cullers & Henry.

(No. 3385.)

Error from Grayson County.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 750. *Jurisdiction; county court has none to foreclose attachment lien on real estate.*Cullers & Henry sued Wright to recover a debt, and sued out an attachment which was levied upon real estate of Wright. Judgment was rendered for C. & H. for their debt, with foreclosure of the attachment lien upon the real estate. *Held,*the county court was without jurisdiction to foreclose the lien and order the sale of the real estate, and to this extent its judgment was a nullity. *[Ante,*§§ 126, 295.]

§751. *Same; want of, will reverse judgment, though not pleaded.*The want of jurisdiction in the county court to foreclose the attachment lien rendered its judgment of foreclosure absolutely void, and this being fundamental error, the judgment, in so far as it forecloses said lien, will be reversed, though this objection to it was not presented in the court below. There being no complaint as to the judgment for the debt, and the judgment to that extent being correct, is affirmed, and the costs of *660this writ of error are adjudged against the defendants in error.

April 29, 1885.

Reversed and reformed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-74784 on Form S-8 and No.'s 333-68001 and 333-114917 on Form S-3 of our
report dated March 14, 2005, relating to the financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Noble International, Ltd. and management's report of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Noble International, Ltd. for the year ended
December 31, 2004.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Detroit, Michigan

March 14, 2005
Exhibit 32
                                                                  ----------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended
September 30, 2004 (the "Report") of TF Financial Corporation (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  we, Kent
C.  Lufkin,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and  Dennis R.  Stewart,
Executive  Vice  President and Chief  Financial  Officer  (Principal  Accounting
Officer),  hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 12, 2004             /s/ Kent C. Lufkin
-----------------------             ------------------
                                    Kent C. Lufkin
                                    President and CEO
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)


Date: November 12, 2004             /s/ Dennis R. Stewart
-----------------------             ---------------------
                                    Dennis R. Stewart
                                    Executive Vice President and
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)
#### Ex parte Johnny LUKE. (In re Johnny Luke v. State of Alabama).

1091202.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 20, 2010.

Johnny Luke, pro se.

Submitted on petitioner’s brief only.

SMITH, Justice.

WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION.

LYONS, WOODALL, STUART, BOLIN, PARKER, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

COBB, C.J., dissents.

COBB, Chief Justice

(dissenting).

The petitioner, Johnny Luke, asserts that his indictment was defective and that the alleged defects were jurisdictional. In making this argument, Luke contends that this Court should overrule *Ex parte Seymour,*946 So.2d 536 (Ala.2006), in which this Court, overturned settled precedent and held that the failure to allege an essential element of an offense in an indictment is not a jurisdictional defect. *Ex parte Seymour*was wrongly decided, as noted in my dissent in *A.L.L. v. State,*42 So.3d 146, 153 (Ala.2009) (Cobb, C.J., dissenting), and as further discussed by Justice Murdock in his dissent in the same case, 42 So.3d at 157 (Murdock, J., dissenting). *See also Ex parte Miller,*41 So.3d 54, 55 (Ala.2009) (Cobb, C.J., dissenting). *“Seymour’s,*most glaring defect is that it abrogates an express provision of the Alabama Constitution: ‘No person shall for any indictable offense be proceeded against criminally by information.... ’ Ala. Const.1901, Art. I, § 8.” *A.L.L.,*42 So.3d at 153 n. 5 (Cobb, C.J., dissenting). I believe this Court should grant the writ in this case and revisit *Ex parte Seymour.*
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of China Bionanometer Industries Corporation (F/K/A Easy
      Groups Limited), a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify,
      to
      such officer's knowledge, that:





The
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A #1 for the fiscal year ended September 31, 2004
      (the "Form 10-KSB/A #1") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
      of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
      contained in the Form 10-KSB/A #1 fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Bionanometer Industries Corporation and will be retained by China
      Bionanometer Industries Corporation (formerly “Easy Groups Limited”) and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




Dated:
                October 26, 2007/s/
                Wang Wen’gengWang
                Wen’gengChief
                Executive Officer/s/
                Xiang QinXiang
                QinChief
                Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 27, 2020

No. 04-20-00158-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.G.F., A CHILD

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-PA-01216

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights, 

which must be disposed of by this Court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. 

Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2. The reporter’s record was due on March 23, 2020, but has not been 

filed. We therefore ORDER the court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record to 

file the reporter’s record on or before April 6, 2020. 

Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, requests for 

extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Delloyd RAYFIELD.

No. 2011-KO-0106.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2011.

*979In re Rayfield, Delloyd; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. H, No. 473-538; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-KA-0421.

Denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Eclipsys Solutions Corp., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Delaware.

SDK Medical Services Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Emtek Healthcare Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of the
State of Delaware.

Eclipsys International Corp., a subsidiary of Eclipsys Solutions Corp. and a
corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware.

Eclipsys Limited, a subsidiary of Eclipsys Solutions Corp. and a limited company
organized under the laws of England and Wales.

Transition Systems, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

HealthVISION, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Delaware.

PowerCenter Systems, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State
of Delaware.
Filed 4/2/09 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2009 ND 31

Freeman Koropatnicki,                                                              Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20080235

Appeal from the District Court of Stustman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John E. Greenwood, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Freeman P. Koropatnicki (on brief), pro se, P.O. Box 5521, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5521, petitioner and appellant.

Jay A. Schmitz (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, 511 2nd Avenue SE, Jamestown, N.D. 58401, for respondent and appellee.

Koropatnicki v. State

No. 20080235

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Freeman Koropatnicki appealed from an order denying his amended application for post-conviction relief.  On appeal, Koropatnicki argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, on his previous appeal, and in his post-conviction proceedings; that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction; that he was denied due process of law and fundamental fairness; and that the trial judge was biased against him.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, Mark L. Wabschall, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of
webMethods, Inc. (the Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: June 13, 2005
    /s/ MARK L. WABSCHALL
Name: Mark L. Wabschall
Title: Senior Vice President and
          Chief Accounting Officer
#### Darrin BUGGS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D10-4469.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Feb. 18, 2011.

Darrin Buggs, Mayo, pro se.

Pamela J. Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion will be filed with the lower court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the order denying ground one of the motion for post-conviction relief in Case No. 2007-CF-002827 in the Circuit Court in and for Orange County. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

SAWAYA, PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 3.1(b)****ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT****TO****RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION****OF****WINSTON HOTELS, INC.**The undersigned corporation hereby submits these Articles of Amendment for the purpose of amendingits Restated Articles of Incorporation. 1. The name of the corporation is Winston Hotels, Inc. (the “Corporation”) .  2. The Corporation’s Restated Articles of Incorporation are hereby amended bydeleting Article 7 in its entirety.  3. These Articles of Amendment were recommended to shareholders by the Board ofDirectors of the Corporation on March 14, 2005 and, pursuant to § 55-10-03 (e)(1) of theNorth Carolina Business Corporation Act, were duly adopted and approved by theaffirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock of the Corporation entitledto vote at the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 3, 2005.  4. These Articles of Amendment will be effective upon filing.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Winston Hotels, Inc. has caused these Articles of Amendment to be executed byits duly authorized officer this 3rd day of August, 2005.      WINSTON HOTELS, INC.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To Hartford Life, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-28805 and 333-28807 on Forms S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-21865
and 333-56283 on Form S-3 of Hartford Life, Inc. ("Company") of our report dated
February 25, 2004, (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's changes in its method of
accounting for [a] goodwill and infinite -living intangible assets in 2002, [b]
derivative instruments and hedging activities in 2001 and [c] recognition of
interest income and impairment on purchased and retained beneficial interests in
securitized financial assets in 2001), appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
February 25, 2004
EXHIBIT No. 15

                               [KPMG LETTERHEAD]


PSS World Medical, Inc.
Jacksonville, Florida


Re:  Registration Statement File Nos. 33-80657, 33-90464, 333-15043,  333-64185,
     33-85004, 33-97756, 33-99046, 33-97754,  333-30427,  333-64187,  333-50526,
     and 333-58272 on Form S-8


With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated November 8, 2002 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is
not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.




/s/  KPMG LLP

Jacksonville, Florida
November 12, 2002
#### In re TRAWLER GUDRUN, Inc.

No. 51-28.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

Dec. 11, 1951.

Joseph F. Dolan, Boston, Mass., for petioner.

Melvin I. Bernstein, Gloucester, Mass., for Helen Mello, Adm’x.

Harry Kisloff, Boston, Mass., for Charles Poirier.

SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

This action was started as a petition in admiralty for exoneration from or limitation of liability. In that petition the owner averred that the vessel was worth not over $179,925.00, and the value of the cargo was not more than $4,582.92. An independent appraiser fixed the value of the vessel and her pending freight in the sum of $175,000. Two appearances have been filed in answer to the petition and the claim of Helen Mello, Administratrix, has been filed in the sum of $5,000 for injuries received by her intestate aboard the vessel. The other claim is the claim of one Charles Poirier in the amount of $150,000 for injuries received aboard the same vessel on the same trip. It is to be noted that the aggregate of the two claims does not approximate the value of the vessel and cargo. Accordingly, the petition to limit liability is denied without prejudice.

There is before the Court the motion of Charles Poirier to modify the original restraining order so as to allow Poirier to prosecute his suit under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, with the right of jury trial. This motion is granted conditioned upon the filing by said Poirier of a waiver of a claim to *res judicata*in this Court on the question of limitation of liability. The petition for limitation of liability is retained as a pending case in this Court to the end that application may be again made for limitation in the event that action in the state court dictates the necessity of such action. See Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Lynch, 6 Cir., 173 F.2d 281, and Petition of Red Star Barge Line, 2 Cir., 160 F.2d 436.
News United States Air Force
 Moody honors fallen comradePublished Oct. 20, 2015
                        
                        By Senior Airman Ceaira Tinsley
                        
                        
                        23rd Wing Public Affairs
                **MOODY AIR FORCE BASE, Ga. (AFNS) --**
                Airmen, family and friends gathered at the base chapel here to say their final goodbyes and honor the life of Tech. Sgt. Marissa Hartford during a memorial service Oct. 16.Hartford was a member of the 723rd Aircraft Maintenance Squadron and she passed away Oct. 14, due to medical complications.The Montana native graduated from high school in 2006 and enlisted in the Air Force as an integrated instrument flight control systems technician.Upon completion of technical training, Hartford was stationed at Moody AFB for nine years, where she held several different duties titles."As little as my words can mean today, what you hear from me is important, even if only to highlight the privilege we enjoy because we got to know and be changed by the kind of person and NCO we served with," said Tech. Sgt. Michael Sessions, the 723rd AMXS assistant first sergeant. "The only option for showing how meaningful Hartford was to you and to me is to remember her and make the most of the opportunities we have now."Because of her commitment, she made this life her life," Sessions continued. "She was dedicated to the principles that made America free. She had such a magnificent heart, and she was totally committed to her family, friends and her profession. The priorities in her life gave her a sense of purpose that inspires us all. Tech. Sergeant Hartford lived out her commitment and we celebrate her loyalty of a life well lived even as we mourn her."Those who knew Hartford described her as dedicated and, Keri, Hartford's best friend, said what she will remember most is Hartford's heart of gold.During her time at Moody, Hartford volunteered about 700 hours to a local riding organization whose mission is designed to help rehabilitate Defense Department personnel."(Hartford) was one of the most caring and selfless people I have ever met," Keri said. "She loved animals and you know what they say, animals can sense a good person. (However), I didn't need animals to tell me she was a good person."Hartford enjoyed karate, snow skiing, horseback riding, fishing and spending time with her husband, Jed, and their son, Wyatt, according to family members.As the ceremony came to an end, guests in attendance took time to reflect on the memories they will keep of Hartford as the base honor guard rendered military honors and executed a three-volley salute.Moody AFB 



ACC 



honor 



AF family