alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00283-CV

__________________

IN THE INTEREST OF C.S.

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 279th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. F-238,543

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

On September 10, 2021, the trial court signed an interlocutory order of 

termination as to A.R., the mother of C.S. On September 13, 2021, A.R. filed a notice 

of appeal. “The appellate court may allow an appealed order that is not final to be 

modified so as to be made final and may allow the modified order and all 

proceedings relating to it to be included in a supplemental record.” Tex. R. App. P. 

27.2. Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court. See 

id. Upon remand, the trial court may issue such further orders or judgments 

necessary to create a final, appealable order in this cause. Unless a final, appealable 
2

order or judgment is included in a supplemental clerk’s record and filed with the 

clerk of this court on or before December 27, 2021, the appeal will be reinstated and 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

ORDER ENTERED November 24, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

AMENDMENT TO RULE 1915.11 OF THE 

PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CIVIL 

PROCEDURE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 641

CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES 

DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2016, upon the recommendation of the 

Domestic Relations Procedural Rules Committee; the proposal having been submitted 

without publication pursuant to Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(a)(3):

IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of 

Pennsylvania that Rule 1915.11 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure is

amended in the attached form.

This ORDER shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and 

shall be effective on July 1, 2016.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 15, 2018

NO. 03-17-00082-CR

Dylan Scott Garrett, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Dylan Scott Garrett

has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Therefore, the Court grants the motion, allows 

Dylan Scott Garrett to withdraw his notice of appeal, and dismisses the appeal. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(File Nos. 333-30122 and 333-43958) of webMethods, Inc. of ourreport dated May 28, 2004, except for Note 2, as to which the date is February 14, 2005 relating tothe financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K/A. We also consent to incorporation byreference of our report dated May 28, 2004 relating to the financial statement schedule, whichappears in this Form 10-K/A. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “SelectedFinancial Data” which appears in this Form 10-K/A.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
McLean, Virginia
#### Charles J. PAL, Jr. v. STRANCO, INC. and Louisiana Commerce & Trade Association Self Insurers Fund.

No. 2011-C-1834.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Pal Jr., Charles J.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Office of Workers’ Compensation District 06, No. 09-03883; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1507.

Denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 20038 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
PONCIANO BAUTISTA ARELLANO , also known as Ponciano Arellano Bautista, also known as Ponciano Bautista

- Arellanos,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4: 13

- CR

- 669

- 1

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ponciano Bautista Arellano has moved for leave to w ith draw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arellano h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 22, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-20038 Document: 00512743764 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/22/2014No. 14

- 20038

concur with counsel’s assessment that t he appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 14-20038 Document: 00512743764 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/22/2014
858 A.2d 74

#### Anthony SPINELLI, Petitioner, v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (THE VANGUARD GROUP), Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 21, 2004.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. It is further ordered that the respective orders of the Commonwealth Court and the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board are vacated and that this case is remanded to the Commonwealth Court with *590instructions to remand this case to the Workers’ Compensation Judge to reconsider the issue of notice under 77 P.S. § 681 in light of *City of Philadelphia v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Williams),*851 A.2d 838 (Pa.2004) and *Sell v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (LNP Engineering),*565 Pa. 114, 771 A.2d 1246 (2001).
News United States Air Force
 Warfield ANGB transitions to cyber missionPublished March 7, 2024
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS)  --**
                The Department of the Air Force selected **Warfield Air National Guard Base**, Maryland, as the preferred location to transition from an A-10 to a cyber wing mission.
Replacing the aging **A-10 Thunderbolt** IIs at the 175th Fighter Wing with a cyber mission will create a natural synergy between cyber assets at **Fort George G. Meade**, Maryland, and the 175th Cyberspace Operations Group already operating out of Warfield ANGB.
The transition of the 175th Fighter Wing to a cyber wing also aligns the Maryland Air National Guard with an enduring modern mission that meets the requirements of the National Defense Strategy. Warfield ANGB is not precluded from being considered for other potential missions in the future.
Divestment of the 21 A-10s at Warfield ANGB is forecasted to begin in fall 2024. Manpower numbers are expected to remain neutral but will be finalized over the next year.
The Department of the Air Force will now conduct environmental impact analysis for the cyber wing, which is expected to be completed by fall 2025 before a final decision is made.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Warfield ANGB 



cyber 



mission 



A-10 



Thunderbolt II 



fort meade 



modernization 



Maryland ANG 



Air National Guard
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Chadward Channell WELCH.

No. 2011-K-0423.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Welch, Chadward Channell; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 5, No. 277,887; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,950-KA.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1701 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1701

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption from 
 the harbor maintenance tax for certain shipping between United States 
                            mainland ports.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2007

     Mr. Weldon of Florida (for himself, Mr. Nunes, and Mr. Shays) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption from 
 the harbor maintenance tax for certain shipping between United States 
                            mainland ports.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Blue Water Highway Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM HARBOR MAINTENANCE TAX FOR CERTAIN SHIPPING 
              BETWEEN UNITED STATES MAINLAND PORTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 4462 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection (j) and by 
inserting after subsection (h) the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Exemption for Certain Shipping Between United States Mainland 
Ports.--No tax shall be imposed under section 4461(a) with respect to--
            ``(1) cargo contained in intermodal cargo containers and 
        loaded by crane on a vessel or cargo loaded on a vessel by 
        means of wheeled technology in a port in the United States 
        mainland for transportation to another port in the United 
        States mainland solely by coastal route or river (or 
        combination thereof), and
            ``(2) the unloading of cargo described in paragraph (1) in 
        a port in the United States mainland.
For purposes of this subsection, the term `United States mainland' has 
the meaning given such term in subsection (b).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LOUIS M. KATZ, RICHARD J. KATZ and CHARLES I. KATZ,

Appellants,

v.

PHYLLIS KATZ and

HOWARD J. WIENER & ASSOCIATES, P.L.,

Appellees.

No. 4D16-3291

[January 11, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Janis Brustares Keyser, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502010CP005000XXXXMB.

John K. Buckley, Delray Beach, for appellants.

Howard J. Wiener, Palm Beach Gardens, for appellees. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

 

GERBER, C.J., LEVINE, J., and SINGHAL, RAAG, Associate Judge, concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT 31.3****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Eugene V. Fife, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annualreport on Form 10-K of Eclipsys Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;     3. Omitted;     4. Omitted;     5. Omitted;     6. Omitted.     /s/ Eugene V. Fife           Eugene V. Fife *Chief Executive Officer*Dated: May 2, 2005
19
exv10w3







Exhibit 10.3








First American Title Company

5 First American Way, Santa Ana, CA 92707

Phone - (714)250-5381 Fax - (714)913-6372




AMENDED/SUPPLEMENTAL ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS




			
	 	 	 
	To: First American Title Company
	 	December 30, 2008
	 
	 	File No:   OSA-3152741 (jg)
	 	 	 
	Re: APN 349-240-043-9, Lake Elsinore, CA	 	 





The above referenced escrow is hereby modified in the following particulars only:



Close of Escrow: The Close of Escrow is hereby amended to be on or before: January 15, 2009.



ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS ESCROW WILL REMAIN THE SAME.





	 	 	 	 	 
	TSG Little Valley, L.P., a California
limited partnership	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	Peloton Partners, L.P., a California	 	 
	 

	 	limited partnership	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	Portfolio Partners, Inc., a California	 	 
	 

	 	corporation	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

By::

	 	/s/ Stevan J. Gromet
 
STEVAN J. GROMET

Its: President
	 	 






Page 1 of 2









 






			
	 	 	 
	First American Title Company
	 	File No.:OSA-3152741 (jg )






	 	 	 	 	 
	Shopoff Advisors, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	The Shopoff Corporation, a Delaware	 	 
	 

	 	corporation, its General Partner	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

By:: 
	 	/s/ William A. Shopoff
 
William A. Shopoff


Its: President and CEO
	, 	 







Page 2 of 2
Supplemental Information to be Furnished With Reports Filed
       Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act by Registrants Which Have Not
             Registered Securities Pursuant to Section 12 of the Act

The report on Form 10-K is the only annual report sent or to be sent to security
holders covering the registrant's last fiscal year. No proxy soliciting material
has been sent or is to be  furnished  to security  holders  with  respect to any
annual or other meeting of security holders.




                                   Exhibit 21
                                 To Form 10-KSB
                      For the year ended December 31, 2003

Subsidiaries of Cornerstone Ministries Investments, Inc.:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     State of             Name under which
       Subsidiary                  Incorporation           doing business
       ----------                  -------------           --------------
<S>                                   <C>             <C>
Wellstone Communities, Inc.           Georgia         Wellstone Communities, Inc.
Wellstone Financial Group, LLC        Georgia         Wellstone Financial Group, LLC
</TABLE>
#### LAFAYETTE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD v. RATCLIFF CONSTRUCTION CO., et al.

No. 2011-CC-1984.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 2011.

In re Corne-Lemaire Group An Architectural Group; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 2008-4236; to the Court *949of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 11-00520.

Denied.
#### Angela LIVINGS v. ACADIAN AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC.

No. 2011-CC-0056

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc.; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 2010-3500; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 10-01220.

Granted. The definition of medical malpractice set forth in La.R.S. 40:1299.41(A)(13)includes the “loading and unloading of a patient.” Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and relator’s' exception of prematurity is granted.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kedrick JOHNSON.

No. 2010-KK-2580.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re Johnson, Kedrick; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. H, No. 482-583; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-1375.

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1





                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
South Jersey Gas Company (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Edward J. Graham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Edward J. Graham
-----------------------------------------------------
Name:  Edward J. Graham
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
March 12, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5          
<LEGEND>                         
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from General
Media, Inc's September 30, 1998 Form 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000      
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                6,320
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         9,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                           4,706
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     26,840
<PP&E>                                                3,592
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       42,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                33,112
<BONDS>                                              79,601
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  5
<OTHER-SE>                                          (75,474)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         42,842
<SALES>                                              81,663
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     81,663
<CGS>                                                35,817
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        39,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (7,441)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (1,278)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (1,278)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,278)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40879

Summary Calendar

 

DOROTHY BEAMER,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JERRY POWELL,

Dep’t of Public Safety Officer,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CV-803

- - - - - - - - - -

June 30, 1997

Before DAVIS, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Texas Department of Public Safety Trooper Jerry Powell

appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for summary

judgment based on qualified and official immunity in Plaintiff’s

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.

The denial of summary judgment generally is not an

appealable order. Aldy v. Valmet Paper Mach., 74 F.3d 72, 75
No. 96-40879

- 2 -

(5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 68 (1997). Denial of

summary judgment in the context of qualified immunity is 

appealable to the extent that it turns on an issue of law. 

Johnson v. Jones, 115 S. Ct. 2151, 2155 (1995). This court does

not have appellate jurisdiction over the district court’s denial

of Powell’s motion for summary judgment because there is a

“significant fact-related dispute,” namely whether Powell acted

reasonably in arresting Beamer. See Hale v. Townley, 45 F.3d

914, 918-919 (5th Cir. 1995).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Roderick DANGERFIELD.

No. 2010-KO-2370.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 25, 2011.

In re Dangerfield, Roderick; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 109619; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KA 0366.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP



                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-30589 and  Registration  Statement No.  333-59781 of FirstSpartan  Financial
Corp.  on Forms S-8 and  Registration  Statement No.  333-70393 of  FirstSpartan
Financial  Corp.  on Form S-3D of our report dated July 19, 2000  (September  5,
2000  as to  Note  16),  appearing  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  of
FirstSpartan Financial Corp. for the year ended June 30, 2000.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Greenville, South Carolina
September 26, 2000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision

          - [AC-51: OTS No. H-4729]

                    Notice is hereby given that on September 28, 2010, the Office of Thrift Supervision approved the application of K-Fed Mutual Holding Company and Kaiser Federal Bank, Covina, California, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection by appointment (phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail                     *Public.Info@OTS.Treas.gov*) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the OTS Western Regional Office, 122 W. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 600, Irving, Texas 75261-9027.                

Dated: September 28, 2010.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Sandra E. Evans,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2010-24772 Filed 10-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720-01-M