alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 5995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2454]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DoD-2009-OS-0158]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by March 8, 
2010.
    Title and OMB Number: Physician Certificate for Child Annuitant, DD 
Form 2828, OMB License 0730-0011.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 120.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 120.
    Average Burden per Response: 2 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 240 hours.
    Needs and Uses: This form is required and must be on file to 
support an incapacitation occurring prior to age 18. The form provides 
the authority for the Directorate of Annuity Pay, Defense Finance and 
Accounting Service--Cleveland (DFAS-CL/JFRA) to establish and pay a 
Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (RSFPP) or Survivor Benefit 
Plan (SBP) annuity to the incapacitated individual.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: January 26, 2010.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-2454 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joe BROWN III.

No. 2012-KO-0027.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Brown III, Joe; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. James, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 5195; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KA-86.

Denied.
##### 



Exhibit 10.56
 BROADVISION, INC.  1996 Equity Incentive Plan
 Restricted Stock Bonus Agreement
   1. Vesting .
 2. Number of Shares .
 3. Securities Law Compliance .
 4. Right of Reacquisition .
 (a)
 (b)
 (i)
 1.




---



##### 



(ii)
 (iii)
 (iv)
 (v)
 5. Restrictive Legends.
 6. Award not a Service Contract .
 2.




---



##### 



7. Withholding Obligations.
 (a)
 (b)
 8. Tax Consequences.
 9. Notices .
 10. Miscellaneous .
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 11. Governing Plan Document .
 3.




---



##### 



Joint Escrow Instructions
  
   1.
 2.
 3.
 4.
 5.
 1.




---



##### 



6.
 7.
 8.
 9.
 10.
 11.
 12.
 13.
 14.
 2.




---



##### 



15.
 Company:
    
    BroadVision, Inc.585 BroadwayRedwood City, CA 94063Attn: Chief Financial OfficerRecipient:Escrow Agent:
    
    BroadVision, Inc.585 BroadwayRedwood City, CA 94063Attn: Corporate Secretary
 16.
 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
 3.




---



##### 



17.
 Very truly yours,BroadVision, Inc.By:RecipientName:Escrow Agent:


4.



---



##### 



Assignment Separate From Certificate
 For Value Received
 Dated:Signature: [Instruction: ]
Exhibit 17.5

April 1, 2008

Mr. Robert J. Skandalaris

Chairman

Noble International, Ltd.

840 West Long
Lake Road, Suite 601

Troy, Mi 48098

Dear Bob,

Please accept my immediate resignation from the Noble International board of directors and my position on the executive compensation committee. As you know from the past
couple of weeks, it has been difficult for me to attend meetings or support conference calls. As the involvement with Arcelor continues to grow, I am concerned the time commitment may be greater than I can support, which would be unfair to Noble.

I very much enjoyed the relationships I developed with the other members and enjoyed the challenge. Best of luck to everyone at Noble.

Best regards,

LOGO

Ron Harbour

1420 Fairfax

Birmingham, MI 48009

Cc: Michael C. Azar
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

                   225 Market Street
                   Suite 300
                   P.O. Box 1190
                   Harrisburg, PA 17108-1190

The Board of Directors
Harris Financial, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-36087) on Form S-8 of Harris Financial, Inc. of our report dated January 21,
1997, relating to the consolidated statement of financial condition of Harris
Savings Bank and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each
of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 1996, which report
appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Harris Financial,
Inc. Harris Savings Bank changed its method of accounting for mortgage servicing
rights in 1996 to adopt the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 122, "Accounting for Mortgage Servicing Rights."

                                                           KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

March 19, 1998
Exhibit 32

                       CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Horizon Financial
Services Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert W. DeCook, Chief Executive Officer and, I, Vicki Hladik,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert W. DeCook                           /s/ Vicki Hladik
--------------------                           ----------------
Robert W. DeCook                               Vicki Hladik
Chief Executive Officer                        Chief Financial Officer
November 10, 2004                              November 10, 2004
#### David and Rochelle BOUDREAUX v. Blake G. MATHERNE and Sandra Deroche Matherne.

No. 2011-C-1143.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Matherne, Blake G. et al.; Math-erne, Sandra Deroche; — Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 144492; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1996.

Denied.
Exhibit 31.1

Certifications

I, J.A. Cardwell, Sr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Petro Stopping Centers, L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2007                  
|                                    
|/s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.              
|(J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)                
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of Heritage Worldwide, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jean Claude Mas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)    The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respect,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the
Company.

     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.


/s/  Jean  Claude  Mas
----------------------
Chief  Financial  Officer

November  6,  2003


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being, Ronald T. Linares, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ronald T. Linares                                              
|Ronald T. Linares                                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting and Financial Officer
|                                                                   
|April 6, 2011                                                      

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            5410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7404
<ALLOWANCES>                                        90
<INVENTORY>                                       1901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 15739
<PP&E>                                           15230
<DEPRECIATION>                                    6676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   31473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8189
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            32
<OTHER-SE>                                       19248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     31473
<SALES>                                          17300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 17300
<CGS>                                             4477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 14454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (120)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (299)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (108)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (191)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (191)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
583 A.2d 343

#### ANTONY A. BRILAKIS v. WASHINGTON BRIDGE PLAZA ASSOCIATES.

March 20, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
EX-10(B)



 


Exhibit 10(b)

 

PNC Bank, National Association

One PNC Plaza

249 Fifth Avenue

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-2707


November 27, 2002


     Worthington Receivables Corporation
1205 Dearborn Drive
Columbus, Ohio 43085
Attention: Randal I. Rombeiro



	 	 	 
	Re:	 	
Extension of Facility Termination Date





Ladies and Gentlemen:


     Reference is hereby made to that Receivables Purchase Agreement (as
amended from time to time, the “Agreement”), dated as of November 30, 2000,
among each of the undersigned hereto. Terms used herein and not defined herein
shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.


     As you have requested pursuant to Section 1.10 of the Agreement, we hereby
agree to extend the Facility Termination Date to November 26, 2003.
Accordingly, clause (a) of the definition of “Facility Termination Date” as set
forth in Exhibit I to the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the date
“November 28, 2002” with the date “November 26, 2003” therein.


     If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please execute the enclosed copies
of this letter and return them to the undersigned. Your execution of this
letter shall constitute your representation and warranty that all necessary
corporate action has been taken to extend the Facility Termination Date
contemplated hereby. This letter may be executed in counterparts and shall be
effective following our receipt of the fully executed counterpart hereto and
once the Fifth Amendment to the Market Street Funding Corporation Liquidity
Asset Purchase Agreement and the First Amendment to the Liberty Street Funding
Corp. Liquidity Asset Purchase Agreement become effective.


(Continued on following page)


 







 


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this letter as of the date
first written above.



	 	 	 
	 	 	
MARKET STREET FUNDING CORPORATION

as a Purchaser
	 	 	 
	 	 	
By: /s/ Evelyn Echevarria
	 	 	
Name: Evelyn Echevarria
	 	 	
Title: Vice President
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	
PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

as a Administrator and a Purchase Agent
	 	 	 
	 	 	
By: /s/ John T. Smathers
	 	 	
Name: John T. Smathers
	 	 	
Title: Vice President
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	
LIBERTY STREET FUNDING CORP.,

as a Purchaser
	 	 	 
	 	 	
By: /s/ Andrew L. Stidd
	 	 	
Name: Andrew L. Stidd
	 	 	
Title: President
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	
THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA,

as a Purchaser Agent
	 	 	 
	 	 	
By: /s/ Norman Last
	 	 	
Name: Norman Last
	 	 	
Title: Managing Director






S-1







 

		
	 	FIFTH THIRD BANK,

as a Purchaser Agent and as a Purchaser

	 
	 	By: /s/ John Beardslee
  
	 	Name: John Beardslee
   
	 	Title: Vice President




ACKNOWLEDGED as of the date

first written above:


 



  	 	 	 
	WORTHINGTON RECEIVABLES CORPORATION

        as Seller   
	 	 	 
	By:	 	 /s/ Randal I. Rombeiro
	Name: 	 	 Randal I. Rombeiro
	Title:	 	 Treasurer





S-2
7 t7tN. 7 "1 7 7 

, 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 21-0001 

IN RE: DISQUALIFICATION/SUBSTITION 

OF DISTRICT COURT JUDGES 

FILED 

SEP 3 0 2021 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Suprerne Coun 

State of Montana 

ORDER 

The State of Montana filed this morning a motion and affidavit to disqualify Judge 

Gregory R. Todd pursuant to § 3-1-805, MCA, from proceeding any further in Yellowstone 

County Cause No. DV 21-00999. Since the filing of the State's motion, Judge Todd has 

issued an order of disqualification and a new judge has assumed jurisdiction of the 

underlying case. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the State's motion for disqualification is 

DENIED as moot. 

The Clerk is directed to provide notice of this Order to counsel for the State, to all 

counsel of record in Yellowstone County Cause No. DV-21-00999, and to the Thirteenth 

Judicial District Court, the Hon. Michael G. Moses, presiding. 

Dated this 30th day of September, 2021. 

• 

/Pic ing Chief Justice 

09/30/2021

Case Number: PR 21-0001
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kerry J. CURINGTON.

No. 2010-K-2612.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2011.

In re Curington, Kerry J.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 03-8005; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-KA-867.

Denied.
1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-2560

___________ Rose Mary Delgado, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Rodney Hajicek, Badge No. 556, a * Appeal from the United States detective and police officer employed * District Court for the by the East Grand Forks Police * District of Minnesota. Department in both his individual and * official capacities; Chris Olson, a * [UNPUBLISHED] police officer, employed by the East * Grand Forks Police Department in both * his individual and official capacities, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: February 13, 2009 Filed: March 25, 2009

___________ Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges

___________ PER CURIAM. Rose Mary Delgado sued detectiv e Rodney William Hajicek, and others, alleging deprivation of her Fourth Am endment rights. The district court 1 granted-2- summary judgment to defendants. Delgado v. Hajicek , No. 07-2186, 2008 WL 2042606 (D. Minn. May 12, 2008). Delgado app eals with respect to Hajicek. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
This court reviews a district cour t’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Davenport v. University of Arkansas Board of Trustees , 553 F.3d 1110, 1112 (8th Cir. 2009). A moving party is entitled to summary judgment when the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, establishes that no genuine issue of material fact exists, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. King v. Hardesty , 517 F.3d 1049, 1056 (8th Cir. 2008). Delgado raises two issues on appeal : (1) Hajicek violated her Fourth Amendment rights by issuing a theft citati on without probable cause; and (2) Hajicek violated her Fourth Amendment rights b ecause he “materially misled” the Polk County Court, leading to the issuance of a warrant for her arrest. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, this court finds no error in the district court’s findings of fact or conclusions of law. Therefore, this court affirms for the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough and well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________