alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE ex rel. Gerald D. THIBODEAUX v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-OK-1723.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Thibodeaux, Gerald D.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rapides, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 11-00627.

Denied. La.CCr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1



                              INFOSEEK CORPORATION
                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Three Months Ended             Nine Months Ended
                                                    September30,                  September 30,
                                                1996           1995            1996            1995
                                              ----------------------        -----------------------
<S>                                          <C>             <C>            <C>             <C>
Net Loss                                      $(3,696)       $  (667)       $(11,986)       $(1,710)

Weighted average common shares
outstanding during the period                  25,931          3,628          11,642          3,697

Shares related to SAB No. 55,64
and 83                                             --         12,483           4,161         12,483

Conversion of preferred stock not
included in shares related to SAB
No. 55, 64, and 83                                 --          9,700           4,534          9,700
                                              -------        -------        --------        -------

Total shares used in net loss per share        25,931         25,811          20,337         25,880

Net loss per share                            $ (0.14)       $ (0.03)       $  (0.59)       $ (0.07)
</TABLE>
#### Howard F. DUSON, Jr. and Virginia J. Duson v. BINTLIFF PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al.

No. 2011-CC-0029.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Crown Central LLC; Ci*own Central Petroleum Corporation; —Defendants); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Acadia, 15th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 84,253; *337to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 10-01181.

Denied.
**Exhibit
        23.2**
 
 **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 We
        hereby
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
        on Form
        S-8 (File Nos. 333-56961, 333-70137, 333-135073 and 333-135028), Form S-3
        (File
        Nos. 333-116390, 333-131881 and 333-136150) and Form S-4 (File
        No. 333-135271) of Brigham Exploration Company of our report dated February
        27, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements as of December
        31,
        2005 and for the two years in the period ended December 31, 2005, which appears
        in this Form 10-K.
 
 
 s/s
        PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
 Houston,
        Texas
 March
        8,
        2007
#### In re Herbert B. PARKS, Debtor. Garson L. Rice, Sr., Individually and for and on behalf of R & P Ventures, a General Partnership or Joint Venture, and for and on behalf of Byron Commercial Investments, Incorporated; Byron Commercial Investments, Incorporated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Herbert B. Parks, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-2678.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued Dec. 4, 2000.

Decided Jan. 9, 2001.

Rory D. Whelehan, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Greenville, SC, for appellants. Gerald Allen Pell, Pell *&*Pell, L.L.P., Greensboro, NC, for appellee.

ON BRIEF: Ralph W. Gorrell, Pell & Pell, L.L.P., Greensboro, NC, for appellee.

*151Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and GARWOOD, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the briefs, appendix and argument of counsel, we conclude that the District Court did not err in affirming the ruling of the Bankruptcy Court. The latter court’s determination that the settlement agreement between the Trustee and Parks — approved by the bankruptcy court, the validity of which is not open to challenge in this proceeding — intended to exempt the entire property itself, is not clearly erroneous, and it does not appear that the settlement agreement unambiguously provided otherwise.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### STATE of Louisiana v. David HAYNES.

No. 2011-KK-1923.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 6, 2011.

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. K, No. 503-118; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1117.

Stay denied; writ denied.

KNOLL and GUIDRY, JJ, would grant.
#### STATE ex rel. Miguel KELLY a/k/a Miguel Kelley v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-1748.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Miguel Kelly a/k/a Miguel Kelley; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. A, No. 350-860; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0588.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, being, Cornelis F. Wit, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Cornelis F. Wit                            
|Cornelis F. Wit                                
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

April 14, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 24 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 24

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  limit the number of consecutive terms that a Member of Congress may 
                                 serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2007

    Mr. Platts introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  limit the number of consecutive terms that a Member of Congress may 
                                 serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within five years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1.  No person who has been a Senator for two full 
consecutive terms shall again be a Senator until the date that is one 
year after the end of such second full consecutive term.
    ``Section 2.  No person who has been a Representative for six full 
consecutive terms shall again be a Representative until the date that 
is one year after the end of the sixth full consecutive term.
    ``Section 3.  For the purposes of this article, any term that began 
before the date of the ratification of this article shall not be 
included in determining the number of full consecutive terms that a 
person has been a Senator or Representative.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Smith, President and
Chief Executive Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the Company), hereby
certify that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ David A. Smith
David A. Smith President and Chief Executive Officer

August 9, 2004
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Western Ohio Financial
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John W. Raisbeck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                            By: /s/ John W. Raisbeck
                            Name: John W. Raisbeck
                            Chief Executive Officer
                            November 13, 2002
537 A.2d 90

#### John R. Morrow, Appellant *v.*Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Appellee.

*327Submitted on briefs March 26, 1987,

to Judges Barry, Palladino, and Senior Judge Kalish, sitting as a panel of three.

/. E. *Ferens, Jr., Waggoner*& *Ferens,*for appellant.

*Harold H. Cramer,*Assistant Counsel, with him, *Spencer A. Manthorpe,*Chief Counsel, *Henry G. Barr,*General Counsel, for appellee.

February 9, 1988:

Opinion by

Judge Barry,

John R. Morrow appeals an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County dismissing his appeal from a suspension of his drivers license pursuant to Section 1547 of the Vehicle Code (Code), 75 Pa. C. S. §1547. We affirm.

Morrow maintains that his suspension is contrary to the law because the record clearly shows that he attempted to the best of his ability to submit to the two *328intoxilyzer *tests*required by the police officers following his arrest.

The trial court found that, although Morrow complied with the first request to blow a full breath into the machine, he did not properly breathe into the machine when he was requested to do so a second time. This finding is supported by the testimony given by the police officer who administered the test. He stated that, when taking the second test.1 Morrow blew only small puffs of air into the machine. He was warned several times that his failure to .cooperate would be deemed a refusal to take the test but he continued blowing small puffs of air rather than exhaling a long complete breath as he had done during the first test. When asked whether he had any physical problems which prevented him from complying with the officers request, Morrow stated there was no problem.

Based on this testimony, the trial court properly concluded that Morrow refused to submit to the second intoxilyzer test.

In the case of *Department of Transportation v. McFarren,*514 Pa. 411, 525 A.2d 1185 (1987) (Plurality opinion), the Supreme Court has recently held that a request for a second test is unreasonable where the only basis offered for the request is to verify the accuracy of the first test. Had Morrow challenged the propriety of the second test here we would no doubt reverse. However, he made no such argument. He argued only that the testimony did not support a finding that he had refused to take the second test. The trial court, as arbiter of credibility, found a refusal. As Morrow offers no challenge to the reasonableness of the second request, we must affirm the suspension.

*329Order

Now, February 9, 1988, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County, at No. 215 of 1986, dated March 18, 1986, is affirmed.

Senior Judge Kalish dissents.

1

 The officer testified that Department policy requires the intoxilyzer test to be administered twice.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Bureau of the Public Debt

# AGENCY:

Bureau of the Public Debt, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of Members of Public Debt Performance Review Board.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of the members of the Public Debt Performance Review Board (PRB) for the Bureau of the Public Debt (BPD). The PRB reviews the performance appraisals of career senior executives who are below the level of Assistant Commissioner/Executive Director and who are not assigned to the Office of the Commissioner in BPD. The PRB makes recommendations regarding proposed performance appraisals, ratings, bonuses, pay adjustments, and other appropriate personnel actions.

# DATES:

The membership on the Public Debt PRB as described in the Notice is effective on September 28, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Angela Jones, Director, Human Resources Division, Office of Management Services, BPD, (304) 480-8949.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this Notice announces the appointment of the following primary and alternate members to the Public Debt PRB:

*Primary Members:*

Anita Shandor, Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner, BPD Kimberly A. McCoy, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Information Technology, BPD.

Cynthia Z. Springer, Executive Director, Administrative Resource Center, BPD.

*Alternate Members:*

Dara Seaman, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Financing, BPD.

Van Zeck,

Commissioner.

[FR Doc. 2010-24267 Filed 9-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.3




                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
eShare.com, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report included in this
Form 10-K, dated April 16, 1999, except as to note 12 which is as of June
15, 1999, with respect to the balance sheets of eShare.com, Inc. (formerly
eShare Technologies, Inc.) as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related
statements of operations, redeemable preferred stock and stockholders' deficit
and cash flows for the years then ended, into eShare Technologies, Inc.'s
(formerly Melita International Corporation) previously filed registration
statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-56299, 333-41503 and 333-89351).


                                          KPMG LLP


Melville, New York
March 30, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 186 (Monday, September 27, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59099-59100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24158]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 76

[MM Docket No. 92-266, FCC 95-397]


Cable Television Act of 1992

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; announcement of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the effective date of rules published 
in the Federal Register on October 5, 1995. The Commission simplified 
rules affecting cable operators' rates and provided cable operators 
with an additional option for adjusting their rates.

DATES: Amendments to Sec. Sec.  76.923(n) and (o), 76.933(a), (b), and 
(e) through (g), 76.934(f), and 76.960, published at 60 FR 52106, 
October 5, 1995, are effective September 27, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information contact 
Katie Costello, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3873594c515d167b574b4c5d545457785e5b5b165f574e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2f9d3c6dbd79cf1ddc1c6d7dededdf2d4d1d19cd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>, 202-

[[Page 59100]]

418-2120, Media Bureau, Policy Division.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a Thirteenth Order on Reconsideration 
released on September 22, 1995, FCC 95-397, and published in the 
Federal Register on October 5, 1995, 60 FR 52106, the Commission 
adopted rules which contained information collection requirements 
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act. The document stated that the 
rule changes requiring OMB approval would become effective upon 
announcement in the Federal Register of OMB approval. On December 15, 
1995, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the 
information collection requirements contained in Sec. Sec.  76.923(n) 
and (o), 76.933(a), (b), and (e) through (g), 76.934(f), and 76.960. 
This information collection is assigned to OMB Control No. 3060-0685.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24158 Filed 9-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,469
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          17,803
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    649,396
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         412,144
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           411,168
<LOANS>                                        905,090
<ALLOWANCE>                                     15,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,070,198
<DEPOSITS>                                     903,607
<SHORT-TERM>                                   590,839
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             22,876
<LONG-TERM>                                    359,431
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     143,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,070,198
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,392
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               18,248
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   150
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                36,790
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,182
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,347
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           15,443
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,050
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 154
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,032
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,689
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,689
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,754
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.26
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,498
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  6,867
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                14,733
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      277
<RECOVERIES>                                         8
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               15,514
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            15,514
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12** 
**- 1142** 

EUGENE P. HARRISON ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
T. BROWN, Sergeant, Detective, Taevor; ROBERT BURNISH, Sergeant; JERRY KELLY, Corporal; SIMON MAJOR, Sumter Lee Detention Center President; JON OZMINT, South Carolina Department of Correction ,
Defendants

– Appellees,

and

SUMTER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; SUMTER LEE DETENTION CENTER; SCDC COMMISSIONER; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 3:10

- cv
- 02642

- RMG )

Submitted : April 19 , 2012 Decided: April 25, 2012

Before NIEMEYER , SHEDD , and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam

.2 Eugene P. Harrison , Appellant Pro Se. James M. Davis, Jr., Joel Steve Hughes , DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA , Columbia, South Carolina, Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II , WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA , Florence, South Caro lina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Eugene P. Harrison appeals the district court ’ s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Harrison v. Brown , No. 3:10

- cv
- 02642

- RMG (D.S.C.

Jan. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED