alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 3 to the Treasury Department Circular 570, 2010 Revision, published July 1, 2010, at 75 FR 38192.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the following company: Allied World Reinsurance Company (NAIC # 22730). Business Address: 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038. Phone: (646) 794-0500.

*Underwriting Limitation b/:*                     $40,957,000.                     *Surety Licenses c/:*                     AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, CT, DE, DC, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WV, WI, WY. INCORPORATED IN: New Hampshire.                

Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (“Circular”), 2010 Revision, to reflect this addition.

Certificates of Authority expire on June 30th each year, unless revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (see 31 CFR part 223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1st in the Circular, which outlines details as to the underwriting limitations, areas in which companies are licensed to transact surety business, and other information.

                    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at                     *http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570.*

Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: September 20, 2010.

Laura Carrico,

Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division.

[FR Doc. 2010-24631 Filed 9-30-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
EXHIBIT 13.1











CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C.





SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE





SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form
20-F/A of Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), Alejandro G. Elsztain, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.











Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y ADate: January 6, 2020
By:
/s/ Alejandro
G. ElsztainAlejandro
G. ElsztainChief
Executive Officer








This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1503 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1503

     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
participate in the Avra/Black Wash Reclamation and Riparian Restoration 
                                Project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2007

 Mr. Grijalva introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
participate in the Avra/Black Wash Reclamation and Riparian Restoration 
                                Project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Avra/Black Wash Reclamation and 
Riparian Restoration Project''.

SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) In General.--The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study 
and Facilities Act (Public Law 102-575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et 
seq.) is amended by adding after section 16__ the following:

``SEC. 16__. AVRA/BLACK WASH RECLAMATION AND RIPARIAN RESTORATION 
              PROJECT, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA.

    ``(a) Authorization.--The Secretary, in cooperation with Pima 
County, Arizona, may participate in the planning, design, and 
construction of water recycling facilities and to enhance and restore 
riparian habitat in the Black Wash Sonoran Desert ecosystem in Avra 
Valley west of the metropolitan Pima County area.
    ``(b) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the cost of 
the project.
    ``(c) Limitation.--Federal funds provided under this section shall 
not be used for operation or maintenance of the project described in 
subsection (a).
    ``(d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $14,000,000.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for Public Law 102-
575 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 16__ the 
following:

``Sec. 16__. Avra/Black Wash Reclamation and Riparian Restoration 
                            Project.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF VARI-LITE INTERNATIONAL, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                                   JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION     OWNER
----                                   -----------------------------     -----
<S>                                    <C>                               <C>
Vari-Lite, Inc.                        Delaware                          Vari-Lite International, Inc.

Concert Production Lighting, Inc.      Delaware                          Vari-Lite International, Inc.

Woosch, Inc.                           Delaware                          Vari-Lite International, Inc.

IGNITION! Creative Group, Inc.         Delaware                          Vari-Lite International, Inc.

Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.        United Kingdom                    Vari-Lite International, Inc.

Vari-Lite Production Services, Ltd.    United Kingdom                    Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.

Theatre Projects Lighting
Services, Ltd.                         United Kingdom                    Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.

B. S. Ltd.                             United Kingdom                    Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.

Irideon, Ltd.                          United Kingdom                    Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.

VLPS, Ltd.                             United Kingdom                    Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.

Vari-Lite Production Services
Europe, NV                             Belgium                           Vari-Lite International, Inc.

Vari-Lite Asia, Inc.                   Japan                             Vari-Lite International, Inc.

Vari-Lite Production Services
Hong Kong Limited                      Hong Kong                         Vari-Lite International, Inc.

Vari-Lite Hong Kong, Ltd.              Hong Kong                         Vari-Lite International, Inc.

</TABLE>
#### D. B. Bullard et al. v. R. M. White et al.

(No. 3027.)

Appeal from Bilis County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 286. *lies adjudícala; injunction cannot be used as a mode of appeal.*White, having a judgment against one Hardeman, caused an execution to be levied upon a bale of cotton which Bullard claimed belonged to him. A trial of the right of .property to the cotton was had in justice’s court, and the case went to the county court by appeal, where judgmbnt was rendered against the claimant, Bullard, and the sureties upon his claim bond, for the value of the cotton, $34, and for costs. Bullard and his sureties then brought this suit by injunction to restrain the collection of said judgment, upon the ground that, within ten days after the rendition thereof, Bullard had returned said bale of cotton in as good condition as he had received it, and had paid all damages and costs. Upon a hearing of the case in the county court, the injunction wras dissolved and the suit dismissed. Upon the trial, Bullard offered evidence to prove that the bale of cotton was his property at the time it was levied upon. *Held,*this evidence was properly rejected. The title to the cotton had been determined in the suit for the trial of the right of property, and was *res adjudícala.*The writ of injunction cannot be used as a mode of appeal. JW. & W. Gon. Eep. § 1209.] And the fact that this court would not have entertained jurisdiction of an ap*217peal from said judgment, because the amount thereof, nor the amount in controversy, does not exceed $100, does not authorize a reopening of the matters adjudicated in the former suit.

April 19, 1884.

§ 287. *Return of property by claimant; requisites of.*The trial judge did not err in concluding that there, had been no such compliance with article 4845 of the Revised Statutes as would operate to discharge the judgment against appellants upon the claimant’s bond. Without considering the question as to whether or not the evidence proves an actual return of the cotton, it is sufficient to say that the statute requires not only a return of the property within the ten days, and in as good condition as when it was received, but the claimant must also, -within said time, pay for the use of the same, and pay the damages and costs. It was proved that the claimant had paid the damages and costs, but it was not shown *when,*whether within the ten days allowed by law or after that time.

Affirmed.
#### Michael WELCH, et al. v. Willis-Knighton PIERREMONT, et al.

No. 2011-C-0075.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 25, 2011.

*458In re Willis-Knighton Pierremont Health Center; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 480,461; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,554-CA.

Denied.
Exhibit 4.3

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                              CONSULTING AGREEMENT

      THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT, dated December 11, 2003 (the
"First Amendment"), is by and among Marquis Development, Inc., a Washington
corporation ("MARQUIS"), and Radix Marine, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Client").

                                    RECITALS

      A. MARQUIS and the Client entered into a Consulting Agreement dated
October 22, 2003, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (the
"Agreement"), pursuant to which MARQUIS agreed to provide certain consulting
services to the Client.

      B. Client and MARQUIS wish to amend Sections 2 and 6(a) of the Agreement
to extend the duration of the Agreement and provide for additional consideration
in exchange for additional consulting services.

                                    AGREEMENT

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and the mutual
agreements, representations, warranties and covenants contained herein, and for
other good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

A. Section 2 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and shall read as
follows:

"2. Consideration.

Client agrees to pay Consultant, as his fee and as consideration for the
Services, Four Million (4,000,000) shares of common stock of Client (the
"Shares")."

B. Section 6(a) of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and shall read
as follows:

"(a) Term.

This Agreement shall become effective on the date appearing next to the
signatures below and terminate eighteen (18) months thereafter. Unless otherwise
agreed upon in writing."


                                       11
<PAGE>

EXECUTED on the date first set forth above.

                                        CLIENT:

                                        RADIX MARINE, INC.

                                        By: /s/ Kathy Bright
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Kathy Bright - President & CEO


                                        CONSULTANT:

                                        /s/ Michael Townsend
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        By: Michael Townsend
                                        Its: President


                                       12
EXHIBIT 21

                      CHORUS COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LTD.

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE CORPORATION

The subsidiaries of the Chorus  Communications Group, Ltd.and their subsidiaries
are listed below.

       Name                                       State of Incorporation


Mid-Plains, Inc.                                        Wisconsin

Mid-Plains Communications Systems, Inc.                 Wisconsin

MPC of Illinois                                         Illinois

PCS Wisconsin, LLC.                                     Wisconsin

Pioneer Communications, Inc.                            Wisconsin

The Farmers Telephone Company                           Wisconsin

Dickeyville Telephone Corporation                       Wisconsin

Chorus Properties, LLC.                                 Wisconsin

*Executive Systems & Software, Inc.
   d/b/a The ComputerPLUS                               Wisconsin

*IntraNet, Inc.                                         Wisconsin






* Chorus Communications Group, Ltd., acquired on January 28, 1998.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00287

- CV

Cecil ADAMS and Maxine Adams,

Appellants

v.

HARRIS COUNTY and Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the First Court of Appeals

Appellees

From the 269th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- 35653

Honorable Dan Hinde, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order dismissing with

prejudice Maxine an d Cecil Adamses’ claims against Christopher A. Prine in his official capacity

as the Clerk of the First Court of Appeals is AFFIRMED. The appeals of the trial court’s orders

denying Maxine and Cecil Adamses’ motion to dismiss Harris County’s interpleader petition and

granting the plea to the jurisdiction filed by Christopher Prine in his individual capacity are

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

We ORDER that Harris County and Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the First Court of

Appeals, recover their costs of this appeal from appellants Cecil Adams and Maxine Adams.

SIGNED December 9, 2015.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-12406

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:14-cv-00099-RWS,

Bkcy No. 13-bkc-23099-REB

In Re: BARTEL JAMES VANDER IEST, JR., 

 Debtor.

__________________________________________________

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BARTEL JAMES VANDER IEST, JR., 

 Debtor - Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(August 18, 2015)

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Case: 14-12406 Date Filed: 08/18/2015 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellee, Bartel James Vander Iest, Jr., is a Chapter 7 debtor. He has two 

mortgages on his house secured by corresponding liens. The second lien, Bank of 

America’s, is completely “underwater.” Vander Iest obtained from the bankruptcy 

court an order “stripping off” Bank of America’s second lien as void under 11 

U.S.C. § 506(d). The district court affirmed. Bank of America appealed. Bound 

by our prior precedent rule, we affirmed.

The Supreme Court granted Bank of America’s petition for writ of certiorari, 

vacated this court’s judgment, and remanded the case for further proceedings in 

light of Bank of America, N.A. v. Caulkett, 575 U.S. ___, 135 S. Ct. 1995 (2015). 

Under Caulkett, § 506(d) does not permit the bankruptcy court to strip off the 

underwater second lien.

Following the issuance of Caulkett, Bank of America filed a motion for 

summary reversal in this court. We deny that motion by separate order. We vacate 

the judgment of the district court and remand this case to the district court for 

further proceedings consistent with this opinion and Caulkett.

VACATED AND REMANDED. 

Case: 14-12406 Date Filed: 08/18/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.1



                 Modification of Partnership Purchase Agreement

                                  By and Among

                      Natural Resource Group Gathering, LLC

                                       And

                            New Frontier Energy, Inc.


This instrument is intended to modify the agreement between the above parties
dated December 26, 2007 and is to be effective as of December 24, 2008.

WHEREAS  the New Frontier Energy, Inc. (hereinafter "NFE") entered into a
         purchase agreement with Natural Resource Group Gathering, LLC's
         (hereinafter "NRGG") purchasing NRGG's general partnership interest in
         Slater Dome Gathering, LLLP (hereinafter "SDG") for a purchase of price
         of $1,075,000, of which $268,750 was paid by NFE at closing and
         executed a promissory note in the amount of $806,250.00 bearing 2.5%
         interest maturing on December 31, 2008. On August 5, 2008 NFE made an
         installment payment on the note in the amount of $213,877.14 consisting
         of principal in the amount of $201,562.50 and interest of $12,314.64 to
         that date.

WHEREAS  the parties desire to extend the promissory note for one year under
         the same terms and conditions with NFE making a payment on December 24,
         2008 of $207,443.71 comprised of $201,562.50 and accrued interest to
         December 24, 2008 in the amount of $5,881.21.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, NFE and NRGG have caused this modification to the
         Promissory Note and Partnership Interest Purchase Agreement dated
         December 26, 2007 to be executed under seal by its duly authorized
         officers or members as of December 24, 2008.

NEW FRONTIER ENERGY, INC.                  Natural resource Group Gathering, LLC

By: /s/ Les Bates                          /s/ Paul G. Laird
    -----------------------                -------------------------------------
    Les Bates                              Paul G. Laird
    Chief Financial Officer                Managing Member




<PAGE>
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Robert P. Stanojev,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alternative Resources Corporation;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

(b)         Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluations; and

 

(c)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

 

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  May 10, 2004 | /s/ Robert P. Stanojev  |   |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                     | Robert P. Stanojev      |
|                     | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----