alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





Exhibit 10.2




FORM OF WAIVER



In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation in the
United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily
waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or
benefits that are required to comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury
as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008.



I acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive
and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called “golden
parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they relate to the
period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the
TARP Capital Purchase Program.



This waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related
to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation a claim
for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by
which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these
regulations on my employment relationship.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                 SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                            27,844
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     38,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         636
<INVENTORY>                                                      161,117
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 234,608
<PP&E>                                                           133,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    28,114
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   346,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             39,601
<BONDS>                                                          120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                          18,359
<OTHER-SE>                                                       175,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     346,361
<SALES>                                                          256,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 256,939
<CGS>                                                            137,970
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    241,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 1,310
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   14,431
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       5,707
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                8,724
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       8,724
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.48
        


</TABLE>
#### Lillian MIRE, Wayne Mire and Suzie O’Keeffe, Individually and on Behalf of their Deceased Spouse and Father, Louis Joseph Mire v. REGENCY PLACE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER.

No. 2011-CC-0435.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2011.

In re Mire, Lillian et al.; Mire, Wayne; Okeeffe, Suzie; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. 0, No. 589,485; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 1625.

Denied.

JOHNSON, VICTORY and KNOLL, JJ., would grant.
Exhibit 31.01

                            CERTIFICATION

I, Tom Hofer, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Vendalux
Corporation

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report(the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors ( or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls'
and

Date: August 23, 2004

By:   /s/
   ---------------------------------
   Tom Hofer
   (Chief Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
News United States Air Force
 Fairchild takes in evacuated McConnell KC-135sPublished April 28, 2016
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Taylor Bourgeous
                        
                        
                        92nd Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs
                **FAIRCHILD AIR FORCE BASE, Wash. (AFNS)  --**
                Because of its ramp space, logistical capabilities and maintenance facilities, Fairchild Air Force Base received six KC-135 Stratotankers that were evacuated April 26 from McConnell AFB, Kansas, due to projected severe weather.
"Severe weather with damaging winds and hail with a possibility of tornados was predicted in Kansas," said Col. Phil Heseltine, the 22nd Air Refueling Wing vice commander. "As a precaution, we decided to evacuate aircraft to an area with less risk."
Along with the six aircraft, 36 aircrew and support personnel from McConnell AFB arrived to continue their air refueling missions.
"We are hoping the aircraft and crews will return to McConnell as soon as possible," Heseltine said. "Although it will all depend on the weather and safety situation."
In addition to the Stratotankers, three RC-135V/W Rivet Joint and one E-4B National Airborne Operations Center aircraft from Offutt AFB, Nebraska, along with aircrew and support personnel, were evacuated to Fairchild AFB last weekend due to severe weather.
"Our partnership and shared resources are hallmarks of how Team Fairchild operates ... and that includes our entire Air Force family," said Col. Matthew T. Fritz, the 92nd ARW vice commander. "We're proud of the ample ramp space we are blessed with, not to mention our unequalled 135 support capability.
“As a 'center of excellence for air refueling,' helping our teammates in a time of need is what we are all about."KC-135 



Fairchild AFB 



McConnell AFB 



weather 



AMC
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of South Jersey Gas Company (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Graham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Edward J. GrahamName:  Edward J. GrahamTitle:  Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 28, 2011
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Targeted Genetics
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, H. Stewart Parker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date:  July 28, 2005                     /s/ H. Stewart Parker
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        H. Stewart Parker
                                        President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                       27
#### STATE ex rel. Timothy Hugh QUEEN v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-2186.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Queen, Timothy Hugh; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 3736-09; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 11-00718.

Denied.
627 A.2d 1126

#### WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. v. ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. AND AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY.

February 25, 1993.

ORDER

Leave to appeal is granted.
Exhibit 31.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302



OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Frank Dalene, certify that:



I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc.;



1.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



2.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



3.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to me, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors:



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: September 12, 2005

By: /s/   Frank Dalene

Name:  Frank Dalene

Title: Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,555,831
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,673,851
<PP&E>                                       8,436,585
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,411,610
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,703,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,592,586
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,314
<COMMON>                                        98,591
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,370,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,703,467
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,422,733
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              96,614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,477,797)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,477,797)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,477,797)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
#### Barbara P. GUINN and Joseph Guinn v. UNOPENED SUCCESSION OF Noah BOHRER and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

No. 2010-CC-2514.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company; —Defendant; Apply*473ing For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 230,197; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 10-00791.

Denied.

VICTORY, WEIMER and CLARK, JJ., would grant.
#### G., C. & S. F. R’y Co. v. Amy Thompson et al.

(No. 1801.)

Appeal from Harris County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 568. *Jurisdiction of county court of suit for damages for injury to an easement; case stated.*Appellees sued appellant to recover damages for injury caused to certain lots owned by them, situated in the city of Houston; said injury being caused by the construction and operation of appellant’s railway along a street upon which said lots abutted. They recovered judgment for $250 and costs. Appellant excepted to the jurisdiction of the county court upon the ground that this suit neces*501sarily involved the title to the lots. This exception was overruled, and this ruling is assigned as error. *Held:*The case of Gascamp v. Drews, ante, § 95, and the case of Scripture v. Kent, W. & W. Con. Rep. § 1057, were suits to *recover*or *impose*easements upon land, and necessarily involved the *title*to the land. But such is not the nature of the relief sought in this action. This is not an action to “recover land,” or any interest in land, but to recover *damages*for injury done to land, and in such cases the county court has jurisdiction, where the amount claimed is within its jurisdiction. [W. & W. Con. Rep. §§ 579, 1131.]

February 25, 1885.

§ 569. *Petition in action for damages for injury to easement, held sufficient.*It is insisted that the court erred in overruling appellant’s exceptions to the petition because it did not appear from said petition that the acts complained of were negligent, illegal or wrongful, nor that appellant’s charter and the ordinances of the city of Houston did not authorize and permit appellant to build and operate its road on said street; nor that appellant had not built said road carefully and skilfully; nor that there was any carelessness or negligence in operating said road. *Held:*The case of R. R. Co. v. Odum, 53 Tex. 351, is not applicable. The correct doctrine applicable to this case was announced by this court in R. R. Co. *y:*Graves [W. & W. Con. Rep. § 579], which doctrine was subsequently reannounced by our supreme court in R. R. Co. v. Eddins [60 Tex. 656]. It was unnecessary that the petition should allege the matters pointed out by the exceptions, and said exceptions were properly overruled.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

                   BROADVISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
            STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
                (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Three Months Ended        Nine Months Ended
                                                         September 30,             September 30,
                                                     ---------------------     ---------------------
                                                       1996         1995         1996         1995
                                                     --------     --------     --------     --------
<S>                                                  <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Statement of operations data: 
   Net loss                                          $ (2,674)    $ (1,007)    $ (6,552)    $ (2,822)
   Weighted average number of common and dilutive
     equivalent shares used in computations:
   Common stock                                        19,889        6,720       14,664        6,720
   Preferred stock (as if converted)                        -        5,600        1,867        5,600
   Stock options and other common stock equivalents         *            *            *            *
                                                     --------     --------     --------     --------
     Subtotal                                          19,889       12,320       16,531       12,320
                                                     --------     --------     --------     --------

Pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83:
  Preferred Stock converted on as-if basis 
    at exercise prices less than the anticipated 
    initial public offering price                           -        3,934        1,311        3,934
  Stock options                                             -        2,634          878        2,634
                                                     --------     --------     --------     --------
Shares used in computing net loss per share            19,889       18,888       18,720       18,888
                                                     --------     --------     --------     --------
Net loss per share                                    $ (0.13)     $ (0.05)     $ (0.35)     $ (0.15)
                                                     --------     --------     --------     --------
                                                     --------     --------     --------     --------
</TABLE>
* not included as effects are anti-dilutive.