Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 192 / Tuesday, October 5, 2010 / Notices 61487 

2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

• Identify the rulemaking by docket 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

• Follow directions—The Agency 

may ask you to respond to specific 

questions or organize comments by 

referencing a Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) part or section 

number. 

• Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

• Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

• If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

• Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns, and suggest 

alternatives. 

• Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

Under section 108(a) of the Clean Air 

Act (CAA), the Administrator identifies 

and lists certain pollutants which ‘‘cause 

or contribute to air pollution which may 

reasonably be anticipated to endanger 

public health or welfare.’’ The EPA then 

issues air quality criteria for listed 

pollutants, which are commonly 

referred to as ‘‘criteria pollutants.’’ The 

air quality criteria are to ‘‘accurately 

reflect the latest scientific knowledge 

useful in indicating the kind and extent 

of all identifiable effects on public 

health or welfare which may be 

expected from the presence of [a] 

pollutant in the ambient air, in varying 

quantities.’’ Under section 109 of the 

CAA, EPA establishes national ambient 

air quality standards (NAAQS) for each 

listed pollutant, with the NAAQS based 

on the air quality criteria. Section 109(d) 

of the CAA requires periodic review 

and, if appropriate, revision of existing 

air quality criteria. The revised air 

quality criteria reflect advances in 

scientific knowledge on the effects of 

the pollutant on public health or 

welfare. The EPA is also required to 

periodically review and revise the 

NAAQS, if appropriate, based on the 

revised criteria. 

The EPA is currently conducting a 

joint review of the existing secondary 

(welfare-based) NAAQS for NOX and 

SOX. Because NOX, SOX, and their 

associated transformation products are 

linked from an atmospheric chemistry 

perspective as well as from an 

environmental effects perspective, and 

because of the National Research 

Council’s 2004 recommendations to 

consider multiple pollutants in forming 

the scientific basis for the NAAQS, EPA 

has decided to jointly assess the science, 

risks, and policies relevant to protecting 

the public welfare associated with NOX

and SOX. This is the first time since 

NAAQS were established in 1971 that a 

joint review of these two pollutants has 

been conducted. Since both the CASAC 

and EPA have recognized these 

interactions historically, and the science 

related to these interactions has 

continued to evolve and grow to the 

present day, there is a strong basis for 

considering them together. 

As part of this review of the current 

secondary (welfare-based) NAAQS for 

NOX and SOX, EPA’s OAQPS staff 

prepared a second draft Policy 

Assessment. The objective of this 

assessment is to evaluate the policy 

implications of the key scientific 

information contained in the document 

Integrated Science Assessment for 

Oxides of Nitrogen and SulfurEcological Criteria (http:// 

cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/ 

recordisplay.cfm?deid=201485), 

prepared by EPA’s National Center for 

Environmental Assessment (NCEA) and 

the results from the analyses contained 

in the Risk and Exposure Assessment 

for Review of the Secondary National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards for 

Oxides of Nitrogen and Oxides of Sulfur 

(http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/ 

standards/no2so2sec/cr_rea.html). The 

second draft Policy Assessment plus the 

supplementary materials are available 

online at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ 

naaqs/standards/no2so2sec/index.html. 

This second draft Policy Assessment 

will be reviewed by the CASAC during 

a public meeting to be held October 6 

and 7, 2010. Information about this 

public meeting will be available at 

http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/ 

sabpeople.nsf/WebCommittees/CASAC. 

Dated: September 28, 2010. 

Jennifer Noonan Edmonds, 

Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning 

and Standards. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24922 Filed 10–4–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the 

Federal Communications Commission 

for Extension Under Delegated 

Authority, Comments Requested 

[September 29, 2010]. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 – 

3520. Comments are requested 

concerning: (a) whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Commission, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

Commission’s burden estimate; (c) ways 

to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information collected; (d) 

ways to minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on the 

respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

and (e) ways to further reduce the 

information collection burden for small 

business concerns with fewer than 25 

employees. 

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) comments should be 

submitted on or before December 6, 

2010. If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting PRA comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the FCC contact listed below as 

soon as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of 

Management and Budget, via fax at 202– 

395–5167 or via the Internet at 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and 

to the Federal Communications 

Commission via email to PRA@fcc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benish Shah, Office of Managing 

Director, (202) 418–7866. For additional 

information, contact Benish Shah, 

Office of Managing Director, (202) 418– 

7866, benish.shah@fcc.gov. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

61488 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 192 / Tuesday, October 5, 2010 / Notices 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0624. 

Title: Section 90.483 – Permissible 

methods and requirements of 

interconnecting private and public 

systems of communications. 

Form No.: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension. 

Respondents: Business of other for– 

profit. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 100 respondents; 100 

responses. 

Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. Statutory 

authority for this information collection 

is contained in Sections 4(i), 11, 303(g), 

303(r), and 332(c)(7) of the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 161, 303(g), 

303(r), 332(c)(7). 

Total Annual Burden: 100 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: N/A. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality. 

Needs and Uses: This expiring 

information collection will be submitted 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) after this comment period to 

obtain the three year approval. There is 

no change in the reporting requirement. 

There is no change in the Commission’s 

burden estimates. 

When a frequency is shared by more 

than one system, automatic monitoring 

equipment must be installed at the base 

station to prevent activation of the 

transmitter when signals of co–channel 

stations are present and activation 

would interfere with communications in 

progress. Licensees may operate without 

the monitoring equipment if they have 

obtained the consent of all co–channel 

licensees located within a 120 kilometer 

(75 mile) radius of the interconnected 

base station transmitter. A statement 

must be submitted to the Commission 

indicating that all co–channel licensees 

have consented to operate without the 

monitoring equipment. This information 

is necessary to ensure that licensees 

comply with the Commission’s 

technical and operational rules, and to 

prevent activation of the transmitter 

when signals of co–channel stations are 

present and could possibly interfere 

with communications in process. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary, 

Office of the Secretary, 

Office of Managing Director. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24634 Filed 10–4–10 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–S 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Change in Bank Control Notices; 

Acquisition of Shares of a Bank or 

Bank Holding Company 

The notificants listed below have 

applied under the Change in Bank 

Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and 

§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 

CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank 

or bank holding company. The factors 

that are considered in acting on the 

notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of 

the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for 

immediate inspection at the Federal 

Reserve Bank indicated. The notices 

also will be available for inspection at 

the office of the Board of Governors. 

Interested persons may express their 

views in writing to the Reserve Bank 

indicated for that notice or to the offices 

of the Board of Governors. Comments 

must be received not later than October 

18, 2010. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta 

(Clifford Stanford, Vice President) 1000 

Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 

30309: 

1. Camp QFP, L.L.L.P., Atlanta, 

Georgia, and its general partners, Mary 

L. Camp and Lovell E. Camp, both of 

Atlanta, Georgia; to acquire outstanding 

voting shares of FMCB Holdings, Inc., 

and its subsidiary, First Choice 

Community Bank, both of Dallas, 

Georgia. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System, September 29, 2010. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Deputy Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24890 Filed 10–4–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210–01–S 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and 

Mergers of Bank Holding Companies 

The companies listed in this notice 

have applied to the Board for approval, 

pursuant to the Bank Holding Company 

Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) 

(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 

225), and all other applicable statutes 

and regulations to become a bank 

holding company and/or to acquire the 

assets or the ownership of, control of, or 

the power to vote shares of a bank or 

bank holding company and all of the 

banks and nonbanking companies 

owned by the bank holding company, 

including the companies listed below. 

The applications listed below, as well 

as other related filings required by the 

Board, are available for immediate 

inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 

indicated. The applications also will be 

available for inspection at the offices of 

the Board of Governors. Interested 

persons may express their views in 

writing on the standards enumerated in 

the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the 

proposal also involves the acquisition of 

a nonbanking company, the review also 

includes whether the acquisition of the 

nonbanking company complies with the 

standards in section 4 of the BHC Act 

(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise 

noted, nonbanking activities will be 

conducted throughout the United States. 

Additional information on all bank 

holding companies may be obtained 

from the National Information Center 

website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/. 

Unless otherwise noted, comments 

regarding each of these applications 

must be received at the Reserve Bank 

indicated or the offices of the Board of 

Governors not later than October 28, 

2010. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. 

Ann Worthy, Vice President) 2200 

North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201– 

2272: 

1. Steele Holdings, Inc., Tyler, Texas; 

to become a bank holding company by 

acquiring 100 percent of the voting 

shares of American State Bank, Arp, 

Texas. 

2. Woodforest Financial Group 

Employee Stock Ownership Plan (with 

401(k) Provisions) (Amended and 

Restated Effective March 1, 2006) and 

Woodforest Financial Group Employee 

Stock Ownership Trust, both of The 

Woodlands, Texas; to become a bank 

holding company by acquiring up to 30 

percent of the voting shares of 

Woodforest Financial Group, Inc., The 

Woodlands, Texas, and indirectly 

acquire voting shares of Woodforest 

National Bank, Houston, Texas. 

In connection with this application, 

Applicant also has applied to indirectly 

acquire Woodforest Bank, FSB, Refugio, 

Texas, and thereby engage in owning 

and operating a savings association, 

pursuant to Section 225.28(b)(4)(ii) of 

Regulation Y. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System, September 29, 2010. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Deputy Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24889Filed 10–4–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210–01–S 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and 

Mergers of Bank Holding Companies 

The companies listed in this notice 

have applied to the Board for approval, 

pursuant to the Bank Holding Company 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES