Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration
 In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of September 7, 2010 through September 10, 2010. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become totally or partially 
                    ( print page 57981)
                    separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; and (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and (B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or (B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the date on which— (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     under section 202(f)(3); or (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    ; and (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers' firm within— (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA-W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date73,584
Analog Devices, Inc., Leased Workers from EDA, Inc. and Nstar Global Services
Cambridge, MA
March 1, 2009.73,651
File-EZ Folder, Inc., Leased Workers from PRO People Staffing Services
Spokane, WA
March 5, 2009.74,284
ITW ChronoTherm, Illinois Tool Works, Leased Workers of Flexicorp, Inc
Elmhurst, IL
June 14, 2009.74,378
Balzout, Inc
Nitro, WV
June 30, 2009.
 
 
 The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act have been met. TA-W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date73,550
International Business Machines (IBM), Global Technology Services Delivery Division, Off-Site Teleworkers
Charlotte, NC
February 16, 2009.73,637
Lexmark International, Inc., Imaging Services, Printing Solutions, etc., Leased Workers, etc
Lexington, KY
February 26, 2009.74,318
Connectivity Solutions Manufacturing, Inc., Commscope, Inc. of North Carolina
Omaha, NE
June 29, 2009.74,326
Pitney Bowes, Inc., Mailing Solutions Management Division, Leased Workers of Guidant Group
Shelton, CT
June 23, 2009.74,350
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Internal Firm Services, Client Account Administrators
Chicago, IL
June 24, 2009.74,429
E.J. Brooks Company, dba Tydenbrooks Security Products Group, Leased Workers, etc
Livingston, NJ
July 1, 2009.74,453
REA Magnet Wire Company, Inc., Algonquin Industries Division
Osceola, AR
July 26, 2009.74,466
Hewlett Packard Company, Enterprise Business Division, Leased Workers of QFLEX, etc
Palo Alto, CA
June 22, 2009.74,487
Aloecorp, Inc., Leased Workers from Link Staffing
Lyford, TX
August 4, 2009.74,489
Warner Chilcott Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Norwich, NY
August 6, 2009.74,494
Dyno Nobel, Inc., Power Service Group
Ulster Park, NY
July 28, 2009.74,497
Deluxe Digital Studios, Inc., Deluxe Laboratories, Inc., Leased Workers from Adecco Staffing
Moosic, PA
July 10, 2009.74,509
NYK Business Systems Americas Inc., NYK Group Americas, Leased Workers Tyken, Ideaon, Comsys, TEK Systems, etc
Seattle, WA
August 6, 2009.74,516
Control Components Inc., A Subsidiary of IMI, PLC, Leased Workers from Mattson, Axis Technology Group, etc
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
August 11, 2009.74,527
Mahle Engine Components, Leased Workers from Action Total Staffing
Caldwell, OH
August 10, 2009.74,532
Whaling Distributors, Inc., Aminicor, Inc
Fall River, MA
August 21, 2009.74,536
Xerox Corporation, Inside Sales Supply Center, Leased Workers of Spherion, Superior Staffing, etc
Lewisville, TX
July 30, 2009.74,543
CertainTeed Corporation
Mountain Top, PA
August 12, 2009.74,548
Propex Operating Company, LLC, Leased Workers from Ambassador Personnel
Bainbridge, GA
August 18, 2009.74,563
All American Sports Group Corporation, Leased Workers from Manpower Staffing Services and Kelly Services
San Antonio, TX
August 20, 2009.
 The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA-W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date74,265
Smith Micro Technologies, Inc
Vadnais Heights, MN
June 17, 2009.
 Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met. TA-W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date73,659
Meridian Enterprises Corporation, Call Center
Washington, MO73,812
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Rockwood, MI73,973
Scientific Games International, Inc., Scientific Games Corporation
South Barre, VT73,974
Scientific Games International, Inc., Scientific Games Corporation
Concord, NH74,034
MMG Corporation
St. Louis, MO74,104
Metalsa Structural Products, Inc., Dana Corporation Structural Products
Pottstown, PA74,196
Ozark Dodge
Ozark, MO74,289
Caye Upholstery, LLC, Caye Home Furnishings, LLC
New Albany, MS( print page 57983)74,289A
Caye Upholstery, LLC, Caye Home Furnishings, LLC
Star, NC74,289B
Caye Upholstery, LLC, Caye Home Furnishings, LLC
Taylorsville, NC74,289C
Caye Upholstery, LLC, Caye Home Furnishings, LLC
Tampa, FL
 Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for  Worker Adjustment Assistance After notice of the petitions was published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. TA-W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date73,776
Workshops of G.E. Henn Pottery
New Waterford, OH73,816
IUE-CWA Local Union 808, International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, etc
Evansville, IN
 The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitions are the subject of ongoing investigations under petitions filed earlier covering the same petitioners. TA-W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date74,303
AGY Holding Corporation
Huntingdon, PA
 The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the Department issued a negative determination on petitions related to the relevant investigation period applicable to the same worker group. The duplicative petitions did not present new information or a change in circumstances that would result in a reversal of the Department's previous negative determination, and therefore, further investigation would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose. TA-W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date74,107
ATK Launch Systems, Inc., Alliant Techsystems, Inc
Brigham City, UT
 I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of 
                    *September 7, 2010 through September 10, 2010.*
                     Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or 
                    *tofoiarequest@dol.gov.*
                     These determinations also are available on the Department's Web site at 
                    *http://www.doleta.gov/​tradeact*
                     under the searchable listing of determinations. Dated: September 15, 2010. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2010-23827 Filed 9-22-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P