alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,594
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          11,006
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                57,598
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      6,217
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,217
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             6,217
<LOANS>                                        248,121
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (3,424)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 357,295
<DEPOSITS>                                     255,847
<SHORT-TERM>                                    43,350
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,462
<LONG-TERM>                                      4,776
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 357,295
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,206
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  887
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   458
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,551
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,255
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 738
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,558
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    (261)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 159
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    752
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       470
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.05
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,308
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,308
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    610
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               (3,870)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      189
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              (3,424)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           (3,424)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1676 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1676

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
    To reauthorize the program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
           Development for loan guarantees for Indian housing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Native American Home Ownership 
Opportunity Act of 2007''.
SEC. 2. LOAN GUARANTEES FOR NATIVE AMERICAN HOUSING.
    Section 184(i) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 
(12 U.S.C. 1715z-13a(i)) is amended as follows:
        (1) Outstanding aggregate limitation.--In paragraph (5)(C), by 
    striking ``fiscal years 1997 through 2007'' and inserting ``fiscal 
    years 2008 through 2012''.
        (2) Authorization of appropriations.--In paragraph (7), by 
    striking ``fiscal years 1997 through 2007'' and inserting ``fiscal 
    years 2008 through 2012''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### HOOVER TREE FARM, L.L.C. v. GOODRICH PETROLEUM COMPANY, L.L.C., et al.

No. 2011-C-1236.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 2011.

In re Chesapeake Louisiana, LP; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 528,504; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,153-CA.

Denied.
#### A VANISH PEST CONTROL and Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc., Appellants, v. Marty O. MARTINEZ, Appellee.

No. 1D10-0648.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 18, 2010.

Rayford H. Taylor of Stiles, Taylor & Grace, P.A., Atlanta, and Mary Ann Stiles of Stiles, Taylor & Grace, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants.

Kimberly A. Hill of Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation appeal, the Employer/Carrier challenges an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) granting Claimant’s request to select his own back specialist. Because there is no legal basis to support the JCC’s award of future back treatment with a physician of Claimant’s choice, we REVERSE. *See Carmack v. State, Dept. of Agriculture,*31 So.3d 798, 800 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). The Employer/Carrier shall provide Claimant with a back specialist of the Employer/Carrier’s own choosing.

WOLF, DAVIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
#### Jeffrey BLOUGH, et al. v. DOWNEY CORPORATION d/b/a M & D Quickstop, ABC Insurance Company, Dr. Mike D. McDaniel, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the Department of Environmental Quality, The State of Louisiana through the Department of Environmental Quality, Benton Oil Company, Inc., DEF Insurance Company, GHI Manufacturing Company, Inc. and XYZ Insurance Company.

No. 2010-CC-2558.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s; London Subscribing to Certificate No. *474CWUL1347; —Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 113,512; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 0930.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., would grant.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David M. Bronson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David M. Bronson                                
|David M. Bronson                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                    
|August 5, 2009
*

The HONORABLE JOHN B. JONES, United States District Judge for the

District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-4115

___________

City of Hastings, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

River Falls Golf Club, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Defendant - Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: June 16, 1999

Filed: July 26, 1999

___________

Before LOKEN and MAGILL, Circuit Judges, and JONES,*

 District Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In October 1996, a Minnesota resident headed home after a round of golf and

some drinks at the River Falls Golf Club in western Wisconsin, near the Minnesota

border. After entering Minnesota, the golfer’s car crossed the median and struck the

car of a Wisconsin resident employed by the City of Hastings, Minnesota. The City

employee died, and the City paid his widow $875,000 in underinsured motorist

benefits, taking an assignment of her claims against the Golf Club. The City then sued
1The HONORABLE HARRY H. MacLAUGHLIN, United States District Judge

for the District of Minnesota.

-2-

the Golf Club in a Minnesota state court, alleging that it negligently served alcoholic

beverages to an obviously intoxicated golfer. The Golf Club removed the diversity

action. The district court,1 applying Wisconsin law, dismissed the complaint. The City

appeals. Its appeal turns on a choice of law issue.

Under Wisconsin law, a liquor vendor is immune from civil liability unless liquor

was served to a minor. See Wis. Stat. § 125.035(2). In Blamey v. Brown, 270 N.W.2d

884 (Minn. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1070 (1980), the Minnesota Supreme Court

held a Wisconsin liquor vendor liable for negligence when an intoxicated Minnesotan

purchased liquor in Wisconsin and caused an auto accident in Minnesota. Blamey has

been questioned in more recent Minnesota cases, and Wisconsin courts may refuse to

enforce Minnesota judgments under Blamey. See Hennes v. Loch Ness Bar, 344

N.W.2d 205 (Wis. Ct. App. 1983). But the district court concluded that “no Minnesota

court has questioned Blamey’s broad holding” that Minnesota law permits a common

law negligence action against an out-of-state liquor vendor. In deciding whether to

apply Wisconsin law or this aspect of Minnesota law, the district court applied the fivefactor test that Minnesota courts use to resolve a choice of law issue when the law at

issue is substantive. See Milkovich v. Saari, 203 N.W.2d 408, 412 (Minn. 1973). On

appeal, the City reviews the five factors and urges a contrary result. After careful

review of the record, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough

Order dated November 6, 1998. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
ex10-1.htm


     

     

    EXHIBIT
10.1

    
      
        
        

      

      

       

       

      
        	
                ACE
      AVIATION TO TERMINATE ITS REGISTRATION OF SHARES UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

              


      

       

      MONTRÉAL, January 6, 2009 – ACE
Aviation Holdings Inc. ("ACE") announced today that it intends to terminate the
registration of its Class A variable voting shares and Class B voting shares
(together, the "Shares") under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").

      


      Pursuant
to Rule 12h-6 under the Exchange Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "SEC") permits a foreign private issuer to terminate the registration of a
class of securities under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act if it meets certain
requirements.  ACE will today file a Form 15F with the SEC to
terminate the registration of the Shares. The termination will become effective
90 days after filing the Form 15F, or within a shorter period as the SEC may
determine, unless the Form 15F is earlier withdrawn by ACE or denied by the
SEC.  ACE intends to continue filing reports under the Exchange Act
until such time as it determines such reports are no longer required to be
filed.

       

      


       

      


      


      
        	
                Contacts:

              	
                Des
      Beaumont (Montréal)

              	
                (514)
      205-7639

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                Internet:

              	
                www.aceaviation.com
H. R. 137

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

An Act 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to strengthen prohibitions against animal 

fighting, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Animal Fighting Prohibition 

Enforcement Act of 2007’’. 

SEC. 2. ENFORCEMENT OF ANIMAL FIGHTING PROHIBITIONS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 3 of title 18, United States Code, 

is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘§ 49. Enforcement of animal fighting prohibitions 

‘‘Whoever violates subsection (a), (b), (c), or (e) of section 26 

of the Animal Welfare Act shall be fined under this title, imprisoned 

for not more than 3 years, or both, for each violation.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for such 

chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 

48 the following:

‘‘49. Enforcement of animal fighting prohibitions.’’.

SEC. 3. AMENDMENTS TO THE ANIMAL WELFARE ACT. 

Section 26 of the Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2156) is 

amended—

(1) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘interstate instrumentality’’ 

and inserting ‘‘instrumentality of interstate commerce for 

commercial speech’’; 

(2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘such subsections’’ and 

inserting ‘‘such subsection’’; 

(3) by striking subsection (e) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(e) It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly sell, 

buy, transport, or deliver in interstate or foreign commerce a knife, 

a gaff, or any other sharp instrument attached, or designed or 

intended to be attached, to the leg of a bird for use in an animal 

fighting venture.’’; 

(4) in subsection (g)—

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘or animals, such 

as waterfowl, bird, raccoon, or fox hunting’’; and 

(B) by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(3) the term ‘instrumentality of interstate commerce’ 

means any written, wire, radio, television or other form of 
H. R. 137—2

communication in, or using a facility of, interstate commerce;’’; 

and 

(5) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(i) The criminal penalties for violations of subsection (a), (b), 

(c), or (e) are provided in section 49 of title 18, United States 

Code.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-25-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-26-1998
<CASH>                                             150
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,389
<ALLOWANCES>                                       468
<INVENTORY>                                     24,507
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,638
<PP&E>                                          64,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,332
<BONDS>                                         63,305
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,121
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,613
<SALES>                                        118,920
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,920
<CGS>                                           92,705
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,207
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,279
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,674
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,605
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       805
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        


</TABLE>
April 17, 2000



Ottawa Financial Corporation
Holland, Michigan

We have reviewed,  in accordance  with standards  established by the AICPA,  the
unaudited interim financial  information of Ottawa Financial Corporation for the
periods ended March 31, 2000 and 1999 as indicated in our report dated April 17,
2000.  Because we did not  perform  an audit,  we  expressed  no opinion on that
information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, which was included
in your  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q, is being  incorporated  by reference in
Registration Statements (File Nos. 333-1350, 333-4242 and 333-79843) on Form S-8
and in the Registration Statement (File No. 333-4950) on Form S-3.

We also are aware that our report referred to above, under Rule 436(c) under the
Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the  registration  statement
prepared or certified by an accountant  or a report  prepared or certified by an
accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.






Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
#### James ELLIS v. James SYLVESTER, M.D. and State of Louisiana, through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections.

No. 2011-C-1879.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

*927In re Ellis, James; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of West Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 20,108; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1260.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J., would grant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10K PERIOD
ENDING DECEMBER 31,1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               118,367
<PP&E>                                          91,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (16,192)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 288,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          (61,792)
<BONDS>                                       (112,849)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          (119)
<OTHER-SE>                                    (113,564)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (288,372)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (357,645)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  347,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,432
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,468  
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,504
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       315 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
856 A.2d 37

#### In the Matter of John E. SHIELDS, Jr.

No. 209 DB 2003.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 8, 2004.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2004, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated May 10, 2004, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that JOHN E. SHIELDS, JR., who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.
Exhibit 10(a)


Independent Auditors' Consent  


The Board of Directors

First Variable Life Insurance Company 


        We
consent to the use of our report on the statement of changes in net assets and the related financial highlights of each of the sub-accounts of First Variable Life Insurance
Company — First Variable Annuity Fund E dated April 30, 2002 included herein and to the reference to our firm under the heading "Independent Accountants" in the
Statement of Additional Information, in the initial registration statement (Form N-4, File No. 811-4092) of First Variable Annuity Fund E. 


s
/KPMG LLP/ 


Chicago,
Illinois

December 31, 2003
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1629 

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to clarify that the value 

of certain funeral and burial arrangements are not to be considered 

available resources under the supplemental security income program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2007 

Mr. POMEROY (for himself and Mr. WILSON of Ohio) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to clarify 

that the value of certain funeral and burial arrangements 

are not to be considered available resources under the 

supplemental security income program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FUNERAL AND BURIAL ARRANGE4 MENTS NOT CONSIDERED RESOURCES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1613(e)(3) of the Social 

6 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382b(e)(3)) is amended by add7 ing at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(C) If— 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 1629 IH

1 ‘‘(i) an individual or the individual’s spouse en2 ters into an irrevocable contract with a provider of 

3 funeral goods and services for a funeral; 

4 ‘‘(ii) the individual or the individual’s spouse 

5 funds the contract by paying for the goods and serv6 ices; and 

7 ‘‘(iii)(I) the funeral provider subsequently 

8 places the funds in a trust or in escrow; or 

9 ‘‘(II) the individual or the individual’s spouse 

10 establishes an irrevocable trust, and the funeral pro11 vider is the named beneficiary of the trust, 

12 then the trust or escrow shall not be considered a resource 

13 available to the individual.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall apply to payments for supplemental 

16 security income benefits under title XVI of the Social Se17 curity Act for months beginning 90 days or more after 

18 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS