alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RENAL CARE GROUP, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED 
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,011
<SECURITIES>                                     6,007
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,212
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,439
<PP&E>                                          52,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,249
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           341
<OTHER-SE>                                     116,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,930
<SALES>                                        151,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               151,813
<CGS>                                          104,037
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,037
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,942
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,436
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (591)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,181
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,242
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,939
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,939
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Will H. HAWKINS, Appellant.

No. 00-2235.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 4, 2001.

Filed Jan. 10, 2001.

Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Will H. Hawkins appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the Western District of Missouri following his guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(a)(2). The district court sentenced appellant to 30 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. For reversal appellant argues the district court erred in calculating *578his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) (applicable to, inter alia, a defendant with a prior felony conviction for *“a*crime of violence”), because his undisputed prior conviction for second-degree burglary of a commercial building, i.e., a gun store, did not constitute “a crime of violence” as contemplated by the Guidelines.

As appellant concedes, in *United States v. Hascall,*76 F.3d 902, 906 (8th Cir.), *cert. denied,*519 U.S. 948, 117 S.Ct. 358, 136 L.Ed.2d 250 (1996), a panel of this court determined that second-degree burglaries of commercial buildings are indeed crimes of violence. We are not at liberty to overrule another panel’s decision. *See United States v. Reynolds,*116 F.3d 328, 329 (8th Cir.1997) (refusing to consider argument that *Hascall*was wrongly decided).

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
No. 87-6283.

#### Kidd *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 17.4

Larry R. Wendling

7060 Rock Woods Place

Worthington, Ohio 43085

February 28, 2008

Mr. Robert Skandalaris

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Noble International, LTD.

840 West Long Lake Road, Suite 601

Troy, MI. 48098

Dear Bob,

After much thought and consideration, it is with regret that I must inform you that I am resigning as a Director of Noble International, LTD chairman of the Compensation
and Governance Committees effective as of February 29, 2008 at 8:00 am. The reason for this resignation is based upon my inability to devote the time required to be an effective member of the Board. I have enjoyed the opportunity to server on
the Board over the last several years and wish Noble the best as it continues to grow in the market.

If you have any questions regarding matters of the
committees that I served, please do not hesitate to contact me.



|                 
|-----------------
|Sincerely        
|                 
|LOGO             
|Larry R. Wendling
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,658
<SECURITIES>                                    13,211
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,432
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,111
<INVENTORY>                                      4,253
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,049
<PP&E>                                          60,761
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,758
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 202,262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,749
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           231
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,276
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   202,262
<SALES>                                        477,561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               477,561
<CGS>                                          209,883
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  461,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,548)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,074
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,187)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,584
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,579
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,005
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, PETER J. RICE, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MRO Software, Inc.,
a Massachusetts Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2004

By: /s/ Peter J. Rice
---------------------------------
Peter J. Rice
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,363,773
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,883
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    144,786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,607,602
<PP&E>                                         564,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                 390,862
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,259,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          316,975
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       134,425
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,808,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,259,711
<SALES>                                        137,288
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,637,288
<CGS>                                           76,044
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,724,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (52,499)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (52,499)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (52,499)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1470 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1470

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Programs 
 Enhancement Act of 2001 to require the provision of chiropractic care 
and services to veterans at all Department of Veterans Affairs medical 
                                centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chiropractic Care Available to All 
Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. PROGRAM FOR PROVISION OF CHIROPRACTIC CARE AND SERVICES TO 
              VETERANS.

    Section 204(c) of the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care 
Programs Enhancement Act of 2001 (38 U.S.C. 1710 note) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``The program''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) The program shall be carried out at not fewer than 75 medical 
centers by not later than December 31, 2009, and at all medical centers 
by not later than December 31, 2011.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1470

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Programs 
 Enhancement Act of 2001 to require the provision of chiropractic care 
and services to veterans at all Department of Veterans Affairs medical 
                                centers.
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Larry D. WILLIAMSON, Jr.

No. 2011-K-1002.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Williamson Jr., Larry D.; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Franklin, 5th Judicial District Court Div. A, Nos. 2008-468F, 2008^69M; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 46,179-KA, 46,180-KA.

Denied.
Brigham Living 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 14, 2014

No. 04-14-00163-CV

AAA FREE MOVE MINISTORAGE L.L.C.,

Appellant

v.

BRIGHAM LIVING TRUST,

Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-01363

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The reporter’s record was originally due on March 18, 2014. In response to a letter from 

this court that the record was late, the court reporter filed a Notification of Late Reporter’s 

Record stating that the reporter’s record was not filed because appellant has failed to pay or 

make arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee for preparing the record and that appellant was not 

entitled to appeal without paying the fee. 

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court no later than 

April 25, 2014 that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to 

pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. If 

appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within thirty 

(30) days from the date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or points 

raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of April, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MakeMusic, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, William R. Wolff, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





July 27, 2006/s/ William R. WolffChief Executive
                Officer
#### Julia NICHOLSON v. HORSESHOE ENTERTAINMENT, Louisiana Partnership.

No. 2011-C-0679.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2011.

In re Nicholson, Julia; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 117,087-F; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,-081-CA.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana in the Interest of M.E.

No. 2011-CK-0414.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Confidential Party; M.E.; — Other(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Orleans Parish Juvenile Court, No. 2008-066-05-DQ-C; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-C-1632.

Denied.
**Exhibit** **32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

I, David A. Smith, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ David A. Smith

David A. Smith

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

February 6, 2008
News United States Air Force
 AF announces total force awardPublished June 24, 2016
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Alyssa C. Gibson
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs Command Information
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)  --**
                Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James announced the annual General Mark A. Welsh III One Air Force Award during a retirement dinner held in honor of the award’s namesake in Washington, D.C., June 23, 2016.
This new Air Force-level award will be presented to the service’s top total force team that demonstrates improved effectiveness, operational readiness and mission accomplishment through integrated solutions.  
During the dinner, James explained one of Welsh’s first obstacles was to restore the relationship between the active-duty, Air National Guard and Reserve Airmen in the wake of sequestration. She also described how Welsh compared the impact of sequestration to a bomb burst that interrupted the harmonious formation in which the total force flew. However, he was confident the force would again fly as one. 
“Today, just a few short years later, we are flying in formation once again and we’re flying like never before,” James said. “We’re working together from the flightline to the highest levels of the Pentagon. We truly are one Air Force ... General Welsh, based upon your contributions to our total force, and also as a tribute to your dad, Mick, I’m honored to announce the establishment of the General Mark A. Welsh III One Air Force Award.” 
To be considered, annual award packages must cover accomplishments made by a team composed of at least two total force components from May 1 to April 30. They must justify the team’s best practices and explain how the procedures would be limited if performed by a single component, how the team shared resources to achieve mission success, and how the process or procedure reduced barriers while maximizing the strengths of each component. 
Total force leaders will facilitate the board and award points in three categories: contributions of an integrated team, scope of the impact to the total force and leveraging a total force team. 
The winning team will be recognized by the Air Force chief of staff during the annual Air Force Association Symposium in September, and have their names engraved on the One Air Force trophy.
“On behalf of every Airman who has served in our United States Air Force, and every Airman who will serve in the future, thank you, General and Mrs. Welsh, for all you’ve done in the past and how you’ve set us on a path for the future,” said James.
The award will be managed by the Air Force Personnel Center, in accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-2805, “Special Trophies and Awards.”CSAF 



Gen. Mark A. Welsh III 



SecAF 



Deborah Lee James 



total force 



awards
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7284 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RAOUL LAFOND,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen,

District Judge. (CR-96-212)

Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 24, 2004

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raoul Lafond, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett, Assistant

United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Raoul Lafond appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for reconsideration of the court’s denial of his motion

to disclose grand jury transcripts. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Lafond,

No. CR-96-212 (M.D.N.C. July 12, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED