alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1501 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1501

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to adjust the fee for 
collecting specimens for clinical diagnostic laboratory tests under the 
                           Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2007

 Mr. English of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. Gene Green of Texas) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
   Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 
 Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to adjust the fee for 
collecting specimens for clinical diagnostic laboratory tests under the 
                           Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Laboratory Services Access 
Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENT IN MEDICARE LABORATORY SPECIMEN COLLECTION FEE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1833(h) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395l(h)) is amended--
                    (1) in paragraph (3)(A), by inserting ``in the 
                amount specified in paragraph (9)'' after ``a nominal 
                fee''; and
                    (2) by adding at the end the following new 
                paragraph:
    ``(9) The amount specified in this paragraph, for the nominal fee 
under paragraph (3)(A) for tests performed in--
            ``(A) 2008, is $6.07; or
            ``(B) a subsequent year, is the amount specified in this 
        paragraph for tests performed in the preceding year adjusted by 
        the annual percentage increase or decrease in the Consumer 
        Price Index for All Urban Consumers (United States city 
        average).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to fees for tests performed on or after January 1, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report of IONA Technologies PLC (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter
M. Zotto, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


By: /s/ Peter M. Zotto
   ---------------------------------
     Peter M. Zotto
     Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 20, 2005
#### Mrs. E. A. Boutwell et al. v. Jacob Hiltpold.

(No. 2886.)

Appeal from Harris County.

Jones & Garnett, counsel for appellants.

Blake Dupree, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 65. *Sale of cattle; bill of sale need not be recorded, when; case stated.*It appears from the evidence in this case that more than two years prior to the levy upon the cattle in question, appellant, the claimant, purchased from Mrs. M. J. Miller the said cattle, receiving a bill of sale therefor accompanied by actual delivery of the cattle; that Mrs. M. J. Miller was at the time of said sale and purchase the owner of said cattle in her own separate right, and that E. P. Miller, defendant in execution and husband of Mrs. M. J. Miller, never at any time owned

*102March 15, 1890.

said cattle or any interest therein. Appellant, the claimant, from the date of said sale and purchase, claimed and possessed said cattle as her property. Her bill of sale was not recorded. It is not pretended that her purchase of said cattle was fraudulent or without consideration, but the validity of the same is attacked solely on the ground that her bill of sale was not recorded, as required by article 4564 of the Revised Statutes. We are of the opinion that said article of the statute does not apply in this case, because the evidence does not show that the sale was of cattle as they run in the range by marks and brands, but was a sale of said cattle such as is named in article 4562 of the Revised Statutes, by written transfer accompanied by actual delivery. It is shown, by the evidence, and not contradicted, that E. P. Miller never at any time owned any interest in said cattle, but that they were the separate property of M. J. Miller, his wife, who, for a valuable consideration, sold and delivered them to the claimant; and that said claimant thereafter, for more than two years prior to the levy, openly and adversely claimed and possessed them. We think the evidence establishes most clearly the claimant’s right to the cattle, and that the' same were and are not subject to appellee’s execution.

Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet and Statement of Operations filed as a part of the report on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended July 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                         150,687
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  467,528
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               589,930
<PP&E>                                         182,894
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 863,615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          650,059
<BONDS>                                      1,049,590
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,187
<OTHER-SE>                                   (852,221)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   863,615
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               877,198
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,327,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                33,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             849,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,300,553)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,300,553)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,300,553)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)
        

</TABLE>
exv10w3







	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.3




KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION




Amendment

to

Awards Granted Prior to 2008

under the

2006 Equity and

Performance Incentive Plan




December 31, 2008





     WHEREAS, the terms of each Award granted under the 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan
(as amended and restated, the “Plan”) of Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (the “Company”) prior to 2008
(other than Awards granted to non-employee directors) and remaining in effect on the date hereof
(collectively, the “Applicable Awards”) provide the Company with the unqualified right to set off
certain amounts payable to the Company as a result of any Detrimental Activity by the applicable
Participant against any amounts that may be owing from time to time by the Company to such
Participant; and



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Applicable Awards to qualify such right of set off
so that the Applicable Awards comply with Section 409A of the Code and are consistent with the
requirements for avoiding accelerated taxes and penalties under Section 409A of the Code; and



     WHEREAS, under Section 19(g) of the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
of the Company (the “Compensation Committee”) may so amend the terms of any Award granted under the
Plan without the consent of the applicable Participant so long as such amendment does not impair
the rights of such Participant; and



     WHEREAS, the amendment of the Applicable Awards contemplated hereby does not impair the rights
of any Participant; and



     WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee has approved the amendment of the Applicable Awards
contemplated hereby.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Evidence of Award for each of the Applicable Awards is hereby amended to
add the following sentence to the end of the section thereof captioned “Detrimental Activity”:




“Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, except
to the extent permitted by Treasury Regulation Section
1.409A-3(j)(4), the Company may not set off amounts payable to it
against any amounts that may be owing from time to time by the
Company or a Subsidiary to the Participant that are “deferred
compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code.”



 









 




Except as specifically amended hereby, the Evidence of Award for each of the Applicable Awards
shall continue in full force and effect. All capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to them in the Plan unless specifically set forth otherwise herein.




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed effective as of the
date first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ John M. Donnan
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	John M. Donnan 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President and General

Counsel
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ricardo K. DUKES.

No. 2011-KO-1368.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 16, 2011.

In re Dukes, Ricardo K; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Concordia, 7th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 08-0854; to the *1200Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-1455.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Calvin TOLBERT v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-2540.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Tolbert, Calvin; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 4, No. 171,362; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. -46,-072-KH.

Denied.
(logo) RYLAND
                                                              MORTGAGE


                                                       11000 Broken Land Parkway
                                                       Columbia, Maryland
                                                       21044-3562
                                                       410 715-7500 Tel



Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Tracey Waldman

RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1996 fiscal year:

(A) I have reviewed the  activities and  performance of the Servicer  during the
    preceding  fiscal  year under the terms of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
    Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide and
    to the best of these Officers' knowledge,  the Servicer has fulfilled all of
    its  duties,   responsibilities   or  obligations   under  these  Agreements
    throughout  such  year,  or if there has been a default  or  failure  of the
    servicer to perform any of such duties,  responsibilities or obligations,  a
    description of each default or failure and the nature and status thereof has
    been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(B) I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
    servicer in good standing;

(C) I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions  Insurance
    Policy  and any  other  bonds  required  under  the  terms of the  Servicing
    Agreement  Trust Agreement, Pooling  and Servicing  Agreement and/or Seller/
    Servicer Guide are in full force and effect;

(D) All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy (if
    applicable) and Primary  Mortgage  Insurance  Policy (if  applicable),  with
    respect  to each  Mortgaged  Property,  have  been  paid  and  that all such
    insurance policies are in full force and effect;

(E) All real  estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any other  expenses
    accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance  on
    any  Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid,  or if any such costs or expenses
    have not been paid with respect to any  Mortgaged  Property,  the reason for
    the non-payment has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G) All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of Mortgage  Property
    required  per  section  6050J  and  6050P  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Code,
    respectively, have been prepared and Filed.



Certified By:
/s/ Michele Drury
Officer MICHELE DRURY

Title  VICE PRESIDENT OF LOAN ADMIN.

MAY 13, 1997
Date
#### In re Sonni I. WILSON, Petitioner.

No. 00-7536.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2000.

Decided Jan. 8, 2001.

Sonni I. Wilson, pro se.

Before WILLIAMS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Sonni I. Wilson, a West Virginia prisoner, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay in the district court. Wilson filed a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2000) on March 10, 2000. The district court filed a show cause order. The Respondent and the Petitioner have responded. In addition, the district court has denied four other motions filed by the petitioner, one was denied as recently as November 28, 2000.

The writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be granted in *149those extraordinary situations when no other remedy is available. *In re: Beard,*811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Because there has been recent, significant action in the case, we find that there has been no undue delay in the district court. We therefore deny this petition without prejudice. We grant Wilson’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.2    
    


August 27,
2003 


Mr. John
Simonelli

President

GrayMark Productions, Inc.

2500 S. McGee, Ste. 147

Norman, OK 73072 


	RE:
	FilmCapital, Inc.




Dear
John: 


The
purpose of this letter agreement is to clarify the letter agreement of of FilmCapital, Inc. addressed to each of us and GrayMark Productions, L.L.C. (the "LLC") dated April 22, 2002
(the "FilmCapital Letter"; see attached). The FilmCapital Letter stipulates that the LLC shall pay FilmCapital the sum of $50,000 for consideration of past services performed by FilmCapital. The
consideration was only to be paid if the LLC raised money from outside investors to fund film projects ("Outside Funding"). 


Each
of us, individually and jointly, do hereby represent and warrant that the private placement offering currently being undertaken by GrayMark Productions, Inc. will and does not fall within
the scope of Outside Funding under the terms of the FilmCapital Letter. Furthermore, it has always been our intent we would be personally liable for all obligations under and arising from the
FilmCapital Letter. 


Now,
therefore, in consideration of valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, each of us, individually and jointly, hereby by agree to assume full and
complete liability for all obligations, performances, liabilities, debts and responsibilities arising under the FilmCapital Letter and further agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless GrayMark
Productions, Inc. and the LLC from and against (and shall on demand reimburse GrayMark Productions, Inc. for) any and all claims, debts, demands, actions, causes of action, suits,
contracts, agreements, obligations, accounts, defenses, offsets against indebtedness, liens, losses, costs, expenses and liabilities of any kind or character, including attorneys' fees and costs,
relating to the FilmCapital Letter and any claims of FilmCapital under or pursuant to the FilmCapital Letter or otherwise. 


Agreed
and accepted this 18 day of August, 2003. 



	

/s/  GRAY FREDERICKSON      
 Gray Frederickson, individually	
 	

/s/  MARK A. STANSBERRY      
 Mark A. Stansberry, individually











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on pages F-2 and F-3 of the
Company's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1998, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                         358,230

<PAGE>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,958,906
<ALLOWANCES>                                   382,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,225,441
<PP&E>                                         380,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                 107,455
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,761,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,609,555
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,136,584
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,015,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,151,775
<SALES>                                     18,686,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,686,982
<CGS>                                       10,714,597
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,714,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,566,202
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             370,032
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,036,151
<INCOME-TAX>                                   420,871
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            615,280
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   615,280
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 22.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the use of our report dated July 19, 2000 with respect to the
financial statements of York Financial Corp. for the year ended June 30, 2000
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Waypoint Financial Corp. for the
year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Post Effective
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-52130) filed by
Waypoint Financial Corp. pertaining to the 1984 Amended Incentive Stock Option
Plan of York Financial Corp., the 1992 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of York
Financial Corp., as amended, the 1992 York Financial Corp. Non-Incentive Stock
Option Plan for Directors, as amended, the 1995 York Financial Corp.
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for Directors, as amended, the 1997 Stock Option
and Incentive Plan of York Financial Corp., the Harris Savings Bank 1994
Incentive Stock Option Plan, the Harris Savings Bank 1994 Stock Option Plan for
Outside Directors, the Harris Savings Bank 1996 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the
Harris Financial, Inc. 1999 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the Harris
Financial, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors, of our report
dated July 19, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
York Financial Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Waypoint
Financial Corp.

                              /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
March 27, 2002

                                       88
#### Wilbert BASSETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D10-2733.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 15, 2010.

Wilbert Bassett, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before RAMIREZ, C.J., GERSTEN, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Williams v. State,*22 So.3d 688 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).
#### Francis R. BALOUN and Antoinette M. Baloun, Appellant(s), v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., etc., Appellee(s).

No. 5D09-2793.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Oct. 15, 2010.

Michael E. Rodriguez, of Foreclosure Defense Law Firm, PL, Tampa, for Appellants.

Forrest G. McSurdy, of Stern & McSur-dy, Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A., Plantation, for Appellees.

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the Appellees’ concession of error, the order granting summary final judgment in foreclosure is reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

LAWSON, EVANDER and COHEN JJ., concur.