```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1495 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                          May 16, 2007.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
1495) entitled ``An Act to provide for the conservation and development 
of water and related resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army 
to construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of 
the United States, and for other purposes.'', do pass with the 
following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 2007''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act is as 
follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 1001. Project authorizations.
Sec. 1002. Enhanced navigation capacity improvements and ecosystem 
                            restoration plan for Upper Mississippi 
                            River and Illinois Waterway System.
Sec. 1003. Louisiana Coastal Area ecosystem restoration, Louisiana.
Sec. 1004. Small projects for flood damage reduction.
Sec. 1005. Small projects for navigation.
Sec. 1006. Small projects for aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 1007. Small projects to prevent or mitigate damage caused by 
                            navigation projects.
Sec. 1008. Small projects for aquatic plant control.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

                         Subtitle A--Provisions

Sec. 2001. Credit for in-kind contributions.
Sec. 2002. Interagency and international support authority.
Sec. 2003. Training funds.
Sec. 2004. Fiscal transparency report.
Sec. 2005. Planning.
Sec. 2006. Water Resources Planning Coordinating Committee.
Sec. 2007. Independent peer review.
Sec. 2008. Mitigation for fish and wildlife losses.
Sec. 2009. State technical assistance.
Sec. 2010. Access to water resource data.
Sec. 2011. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal 
                            interests.
Sec. 2012. Regional sediment management.
Sec. 2013. National shoreline erosion control development program.
Sec. 2014. Shore protection projects.
Sec. 2015. Cost sharing for monitoring.
Sec. 2016. Ecosystem restoration benefits.
Sec. 2017. Funding to expedite the evaluation and processing of 
                            permits.
Sec. 2018. Electronic submission of permit applications.
Sec. 2019. Improvement of water management at Corps of Engineers 
                            reservoirs.
Sec. 2020. Federal hopper dredges.
Sec. 2021. Extraordinary rainfall events.
Sec. 2022. Wildfire firefighting.
Sec. 2023. Nonprofit organizations as sponsors.
Sec. 2024. Project administration.
Sec. 2025. Program administration.
Sec. 2026. Extension of shore protection projects.
Sec. 2027. Tribal partnership program.
Sec. 2028. Project deauthorization.

              Subtitle B--Continuing Authorities Projects

Sec. 2031. Navigation enhancements for waterborne transportation.
Sec. 2032. Protection and restoration due to emergencies at shores and 
                            streambanks.
Sec. 2033. Restoration of the environment for protection of aquatic and 
                            riparian ecosystems program.
Sec. 2034. Environmental modification of projects for improvement and 
                            restoration of ecosystems program.
Sec. 2035. Projects to enhance estuaries and coastal habitats.
Sec. 2036. Remediation of abandoned mine sites.
Sec. 2037. Small projects for the rehabilitation and removal of dams.
Sec. 2038. Remote, maritime-dependent communities.
Sec. 2039. Agreements for water resource projects.
Sec. 2040. Program names.

               Subtitle C--National Levee Safety Program

Sec. 2051. Short title.
Sec. 2052. Definitions.
Sec. 2053. National Levee Safety Committee.
Sec. 2054. National Levee Safety Program.
Sec. 2055. Authorization of appropriations.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 3001. St. Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, Alaska.
Sec. 3002. Sitka, Alaska.
Sec. 3003. Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers, Alabama.
Sec. 3004. Nogales Wash and tributaries flood control project, Arizona.
Sec. 3005. Rio de Flag, Flagstaff, Arizona.
Sec. 3006. Tucson drainage area (Tucson Arroyo), Arizona.
Sec. 3007. Augusta and Clarendon, Arkansas.
Sec. 3008. Eastern Arkansas Enterprise Community, Arkansas.
Sec. 3009. Red-Ouachita River Basin levees, Arkansas and Louisiana.
Sec. 3010. St. Francis Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.
Sec. 3011. St. Francis Basin land transfer, Arkansas and Missouri.
Sec. 3012. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, Arkansas 
                            and Oklahoma.
Sec. 3013. Cache Creek Basin, California.
Sec. 3014. CALFED levee stability program, California.
Sec. 3015. Hamilton Airfield, California.
Sec. 3016. LA-3 dredged material ocean disposal site designation, 
                            California.
Sec. 3017. Larkspur Ferry Channel, California.
Sec. 3018. Llagas Creek, California.
Sec. 3019. Magpie Creek, California.
Sec. 3020. Petaluma River, Petaluma, California.
Sec. 3021. Pine Flat Dam fish and wildlife habitat, California.
Sec. 3022. Redwood City Navigation Project, California.
Sec. 3023. Sacramento and American Rivers flood control, California.
Sec. 3024. Sacramento River bank protection project, California.
Sec. 3025. Conditional declaration of nonnavigability, Port of San 
                            Francisco, California.
Sec. 3026. Salton Sea restoration, California.
Sec. 3027. Santa Barbara Streams, Lower Mission Creek, California.
Sec. 3028. Upper Guadalupe River, California.
Sec. 3029. Yuba River Basin project, California.
Sec. 3030. Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater, New Haven Harbor, 
                            Connecticut.
Sec. 3031. Anchorage area, New London Harbor, Connecticut.
Sec. 3032. Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut.
Sec. 3033. St. George's Bridge, Delaware.
Sec. 3034. Additional program authority, comprehensive Everglades 
                            restoration, Florida.
Sec. 3035. Brevard County, Florida.
Sec. 3036. Critical restoration projects, Everglades and south Florida 
                            ecosystem restoration, Florida.
Sec. 3037. Lake Okeechobee and Hillsboro Aquifer pilot projects, 
                            comprehensive Everglades restoration, 
                            Florida.
Sec. 3038. Lido Key, Sarasota County, Florida.
Sec. 3039. Port Sutton Channel, Tampa Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 3040. Tampa Harbor, Cut B, Tampa, Florida.
Sec. 3041. Allatoona Lake, Georgia.
Sec. 3042. Dworshak Reservoir improvements, Idaho.
Sec. 3043. Little Wood River, Gooding, Idaho.
Sec. 3044. Port of Lewiston, Idaho.
Sec. 3045. Cache River Levee, Illinois.
Sec. 3046. Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 3047. Chicago River, Illinois.
Sec. 3048. Illinois River Basin restoration.
Sec. 3049. Missouri and Illinois flood protection projects 
                            reconstruction pilot program.
Sec. 3050. Spunky Bottom, Illinois.
Sec. 3051. Strawn Cemetery, John Redmond Lake, Kansas.
Sec. 3052. Milford Lake, Milford, Kansas.
Sec. 3053. Ohio River Basin comprehensive plan.
Sec. 3054. Hickman Bluff stabilization, Kentucky.
Sec. 3055. McAlpine Lock and Dam, Kentucky and Indiana.
Sec. 3056. Public access, Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, Louisiana.
Sec. 3057. Regional visitor center, Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, 
                            Louisiana.
Sec. 3058. Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana.
Sec. 3059. East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 3060. Mississippi River Gulf Outlet relocation assistance, 
                            Louisiana.
Sec. 3061. Red River (J. Bennett Johnston) Waterway, Louisiana.
Sec. 3062. Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine.
Sec. 3063. Rockland Harbor, Maine.
Sec. 3064. Rockport Harbor, Maine.
Sec. 3065. Saco River, Maine.
Sec. 3066. Union River, Maine.
Sec. 3067. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Maryland and Virginia.
Sec. 3068. Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and protection 
                            program, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and 
                            Virginia.
Sec. 3069. Flood protection project, Cumberland, Maryland.
Sec. 3070. Aunt Lydia's Cove, Massachusetts.
Sec. 3071. Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.
Sec. 3072. North River, Peabody, Massachusetts.
Sec. 3073. Ecorse Creek, Michigan.
Sec. 3074. St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan.
Sec. 3075. Duluth Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 3076. Project for environmental enhancement, Mississippi and 
                            Louisiana estuarine areas, Mississippi and 
                            Louisiana.
Sec. 3077. Land exchange, Pike County, Missouri.
Sec. 3078. L-15 levee, Missouri.
Sec. 3079. Union Lake, Missouri.
Sec. 3080. Lower Yellowstone project, Montana.
Sec. 3081. Yellowstone River and tributaries, Montana and North Dakota.
Sec. 3082. Western Sarpy and Clear Creek, Nebraska.
Sec. 3083. Lower Truckee River, McCarran Ranch, Nevada.
Sec. 3084. Cooperative agreements, New Mexico.
Sec. 3085. Middle Rio Grande restoration, New Mexico.
Sec. 3086. Long Island Sound oyster restoration, New York and 
                            Connecticut.
Sec. 3087. Mamaroneck and Sheldrake Rivers watershed management, New 
                            York.
Sec. 3088. Orchard Beach, Bronx, New York.
Sec. 3089. New York Harbor, New York, New York.
Sec. 3090. New York State Canal System.
Sec. 3091. Susquehanna River and Upper Delaware River watershed 
                            management, New York.
Sec. 3092. Missouri River restoration, North Dakota.
Sec. 3093. Ohio.
Sec. 3094. Lower Girard Lake Dam, Girard, Ohio.
Sec. 3095. Toussaint River Navigation Project, Carroll Township, Ohio.
Sec. 3096. Arcadia Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3097. Lake Eufaula, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3098. Release of reversionary interest, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3099. Oklahoma lakes demonstration program, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3100. Ottawa County, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3101. Red River chloride control, Oklahoma and Texas.
Sec. 3102. Waurika Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 3103. Lookout Point project, Lowell, Oregon.
Sec. 3104. Upper Willamette River Watershed ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 3105. Upper Susquehanna River Basin, Pennsylvania and New York.
Sec. 3106. Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island.
Sec. 3107. South Carolina Department of Commerce development proposal 
                            at Richard B. Russell Lake, South Carolina.
Sec. 3108. Missouri River restoration, South Dakota.
Sec. 3109. Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers enhancement project.
Sec. 3110. Nonconnah Weir, Memphis, Tennessee.
Sec. 3111. Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Cumberland River, Tennessee.
Sec. 3112. Sandy Creek, Jackson County, Tennessee.
Sec. 3113. Cedar Bayou, Texas.
Sec. 3114. Denison, Texas.
Sec. 3115. Central City, Fort Worth, Texas.
Sec. 3116. Freeport Harbor, Texas.
Sec. 3117. Harris County, Texas.
Sec. 3118. Connecticut River restoration, Vermont.
Sec. 3119. Dam remediation, Vermont.
Sec. 3120. Lake Champlain Eurasian milfoil, water chestnut, and other 
                            nonnative plant control, Vermont.
Sec. 3121. Upper Connecticut River Basin wetland restoration, Vermont 
                            and New Hampshire.
Sec. 3122. Upper Connecticut River Basin ecosystem restoration, Vermont 
                            and New Hampshire.
Sec. 3123. Lake Champlain watershed, Vermont and New York.
Sec. 3124. Chesapeake Bay oyster restoration, Virginia and Maryland.
Sec. 3125. James River, Virginia.
Sec. 3126. Tangier Island Seawall, Virginia.
Sec. 3127. Erosion control, Puget Island, Wahkiakum County, Washington.
Sec. 3128. Lower granite pool, Washington.
Sec. 3129. McNary Lock and Dam, McNary National Wildlife Refuge, 
                            Washington and Idaho.
Sec. 3130. Snake River project, Washington and Idaho.
Sec. 3131. Whatcom Creek Waterway, Bellingham, Washington.
Sec. 3132. Lower Mud River, Milton, West Virginia.
Sec. 3133. McDowell County, West Virginia.
Sec. 3134. Green Bay Harbor project, Green Bay, Wisconsin.
Sec. 3135. Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin.
Sec. 3136. Oconto Harbor, Wisconsin.
Sec. 3137. Mississippi River headwaters reservoirs.
Sec. 3138. Lower Mississippi River Museum and Riverfront Interpretive 
                            Site.
Sec. 3139. Upper Mississippi River system environmental management 
                            program.
Sec. 3140. Upper basin of Missouri River.
Sec. 3141. Great Lakes fishery and ecosystem restoration program.
Sec. 3142. Great Lakes remedial action plans and sediment remediation.
Sec. 3143. Great Lakes tributary models.
Sec. 3144. Upper Ohio River and tributaries navigation system new 
                            technology pilot program.
Sec. 3145. Perry Creek, Iowa.
Sec. 3146. Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
Sec. 3147. Jackson County, Mississippi.
Sec. 3148. Sandbridge Beach, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 4001. Seward Breakwater, Alaska.
Sec. 4002. Nome Harbor improvements, Alaska.
Sec. 4003. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation Channel.
Sec. 4004. Fruitvale Avenue Railroad Bridge, Alameda, California.
Sec. 4005. Los Angeles River revitalization study, California.
Sec. 4006. Nicholas Canyon, Los Angeles, California.
Sec. 4007. Oceanside, California, shoreline special study.
Sec. 4008. Comprehensive flood protection project, St. Helena, 
                            California.
Sec. 4009. San Francisco Bay, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, Sherman 
                            Island, California.
Sec. 4010. South San Francisco Bay shoreline study, California.
Sec. 4011. San Pablo Bay Watershed restoration, California.
Sec. 4012. Fountain Creek, North of Pueblo, Colorado.
Sec. 4013. Selenium study, Colorado.
Sec. 4014. Delaware inland bays and tributaries and Atlantic Coast, 
                            Delaware.
Sec. 4015. Herbert Hoover Dike supplemental major rehabilitation 
                            report, Florida.
Sec. 4016. Boise River, Idaho.
Sec. 4017. Promontory Point third-party review, Chicago shoreline, 
                            Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 4018. Vidalia Port, Louisiana.
Sec. 4019. Lake Erie at Luna Pier, Michigan.
Sec. 4020. Wild Rice River, Minnesota.
Sec. 4021. Asian carp dispersal barrier demonstration project, Upper 
                            Mississippi River.
Sec. 4022. Flood damage reduction, Ohio.
Sec. 4023. Middle Bass Island State Park, Middle Bass Island, Ohio.
Sec. 4024. Ohio River, Ohio.
Sec. 4025. Toledo Harbor dredged material placement, Toledo, Ohio.
Sec. 4026. Toledo Harbor, Maumee River, and Lake Channel Project, 
                            Toledo, Ohio.
Sec. 4027. Woonsocket local protection project, Blackstone River Basin, 
                            Rhode Island.
Sec. 4028. Jasper County port facility study, South Carolina.
Sec. 4029. Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas.
Sec. 4030. Ecosystem and hydropower generation dams, Vermont.
Sec. 4031. Eurasian milfoil.
Sec. 4032. Lake Champlain Canal study, Vermont and New York.
Sec. 4033. Baker Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington.
Sec. 4034. Elliot Bay seawall rehabilitation study, Washington.
Sec. 4035. Johnsonville Dam, Johnsonville, Wisconsin.
Sec. 4036. Debris removal.
Sec. 4037. Mohawk River, Oneida County, New York.
Sec. 4038. Walla Walla River Basin, Oregon and Washington.

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec. 5001. Lakes program.
Sec. 5002. Estuary restoration.
Sec. 5003. Environmental infrastructure.
Sec. 5004. Alaska.
Sec. 5005. California.
Sec. 5006. Conveyance of Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal property.
Sec. 5007. Stockton, California.
Sec. 5008. Rio Grande environmental management program, Colorado, New 
                            Mexico, and Texas.
Sec. 5009. Delmarva conservation corridor, Delaware and Maryland.
Sec. 5010. Susquehanna, Delaware, and Potomac River Basins, Delaware, 
                            Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.
Sec. 5011. Anacostia River, District of Columbia and Maryland.
Sec. 5012. Big Creek, Georgia, watershed management and restoration 
                            program.
Sec. 5013. Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District.
Sec. 5014. Idaho, Montana, rural Nevada, New Mexico, rural Utah, and 
                            Wyoming.
Sec. 5015. Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal Dispersal Barriers project, 
                            Illinois.
Sec. 5016. Missouri River and tributaries, mitigation, recovery and 
                            restoration, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, 
                            Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South 
                            Dakota, and Wyoming.
Sec. 5017. Southeast Louisiana region, Louisiana.
Sec. 5018. Mississippi.
Sec. 5019. St. Mary Project, Blackfeet Reservation, Montana.
Sec. 5020. Lower Platte River watershed restoration, Nebraska.
Sec. 5021. North Carolina.
Sec. 5022. Ohio River Basin environmental management.
Sec. 5023. Statewide comprehensive water planning, Oklahoma.
Sec. 5024. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, and 
                            terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration, 
                            South Dakota.
Sec. 5025. Texas.
Sec. 5026. Connecticut River dams, Vermont.
Sec. 5027. Cost sharing provisions for the territories.
Sec. 5028. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock project.
Sec. 5029. Great Lakes navigation.

                   TITLE VI--PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS

Sec. 6001. Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Alabama.
Sec. 6002. Goleta and Vicinity, California.
Sec. 6003. Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut.
Sec. 6004. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Part 
                            II, installation of fender protection for 
                            bridges, Delaware and Maryland.
Sec. 6005. Shingle Creek Basin, Florida.
Sec. 6006. Illinois Waterway, South Fork of the South Branch of the 
                            Chicago River, Illinois.
Sec. 6007. Brevoort, Indiana.
Sec. 6008. Middle Wabash, Greenfield Bayou, Indiana.
Sec. 6009. Lake George, Hobart, Indiana.
Sec. 6010. Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, Iowa.
Sec. 6011. Muscatine Harbor, Iowa.
Sec. 6012. Big South Fork National River and recreational area, 
                            Kentucky and Tennessee.
Sec. 6013. Eagle Creek Lake, Kentucky.
Sec. 6014. Hazard, Kentucky.
Sec. 6015. West Kentucky Tributaries, Kentucky.
Sec. 6016. Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries, Louisiana.
Sec. 6017. Bayou LaFourche and LaFourche Jump, Louisiana.
Sec. 6018. Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, 
                            Louisiana.
Sec. 6019. Fort Livingston, Grand Terre Island, Louisiana.
Sec. 6020. Gulf Intercoastal Waterway, Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur, 
                            Louisiana.
Sec. 6021. Red River Waterway, Shreveport, Louisiana to Daingerfield, 
                            Texas.
Sec. 6022. Casco Bay, Portland, Maine.
Sec. 6023. Northeast Harbor, Maine.
Sec. 6024. Penobscot River, Bangor, Maine.
Sec. 6025. Saint John River Basin, Maine.
Sec. 6026. Tenants Harbor, Maine.
Sec. 6027. Falmouth Harbor, Massachusetts.
Sec. 6028. Island End River, Massachusetts.
Sec. 6029. Mystic River, Massachusetts.
Sec. 6030. Grand Haven Harbor, Michigan.
Sec. 6031. Greenville Harbor, Mississippi.
Sec. 6032. Platte River flood and related streambank erosion control, 
                            Nebraska.
Sec. 6033. Epping, New Hampshire.
Sec. 6034. New York Harbor and adjacent channels, Claremont Terminal, 
                            Jersey City, New Jersey.
Sec. 6035. Eisenhower and Snell Locks, New York.
Sec. 6036. Olcott Harbor, Lake Ontario, New York.
Sec. 6037. Outer Harbor, Buffalo, New York.
Sec. 6038. Sugar Creek Basin, North Carolina and South Carolina.
Sec. 6039. Cleveland Harbor 1958 Act, Ohio.
Sec. 6040. Cleveland Harbor 1960 Act, Ohio.
Sec. 6041. Cleveland Harbor, uncompleted portion of Cut #4, Ohio.
Sec. 6042. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, Oregon.
Sec. 6043. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 6044. Tamaqua, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 6045. Narragansett Town Beach, Narragansett, Rhode Island.
Sec. 6046. Quonset Point-Davisville, Rhode Island.
Sec. 6047. Arroyo Colorado, Texas.
Sec. 6048. Cypress Creek-Structural, Texas.
Sec. 6049. East Fork Channel Improvement, Increment 2, East Fork of the 
                            Trinity River, Texas.
Sec. 6050. Falfurrias, Texas.
Sec. 6051. Pecan Bayou Lake, Texas.
Sec. 6052. Lake of the Pines, Texas.
Sec. 6053. Tennessee Colony Lake, Texas.
Sec. 6054. City Waterway, Tacoma, Washington.
Sec. 6055. Kanawha River, Charleston, West Virginia.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.

    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the 
Army.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 1001. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    Except as otherwise provided in this section, the following 
projects for water resources development and conservation and other 
purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary 
substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the 
conditions, described in the respective reports designated in this 
section:
            (1) Haines harbor, alaska.--The project for navigation, 
        Haines Harbor, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        December 20, 2004, at a total cost of $14,040,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $11,232,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $2,808,000.
            (2) Tanque verde creek, arizona.--The project for ecosystem 
        restoration, Tanque Verde Creek, Arizona: Report of the Chief 
        of Engineers dated July 22, 2003, at a total cost of 
        $5,906,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,836,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $2,070,000.
            (3) Salt river (va shlyay akimel), maricopa county, 
        arizona.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for ecosystem 
                restoration, Salt River (Va Shlyay Akimel), Arizona: 
                Report of the Chief of Engineers dated January 3, 2005, 
                at a total cost of $162,100,000, with an estimated 
                Federal cost of $105,200,000 and an estimated non-
                Federal cost of $56,900,000.
                    (B) Coordination with federal reclamation 
                projects.--The Secretary, to the maximum extent 
                practicable, shall coordinate the development and 
                construction of the project described in subparagraph 
                (A) with each Federal reclamation project located in 
                the Salt River Basin to address statutory requirements 
                and the operations of those projects.
            (4) May branch, fort smith, arkansas.--The project for 
        flood damage reduction, May Branch, Fort Smith, Arkansas: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a 
        total cost of $30,850,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $15,010,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $15,840,000.
            (5) Hamilton city, california.--The project for flood 
        damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, Hamilton City, 
        California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 
        2004, at a total cost of $52,400,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $34,100,000 and estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $18,300,000.
            (6) Imperial beach, california.--The project for storm 
        damage reduction, Imperial Beach, California: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated December 30, 2003, at a total cost of 
        $13,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $8,521,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,179,000, and at an 
        estimated total cost of $42,500,000 for periodic beach 
        nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $21,250,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $21,250,000.
            (7) Matilija dam, ventura county, california.--The project 
        for ecosystem restoration, Matilija Dam and Ventura River 
        Watershed, Ventura County, California: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated December 20, 2004, at a total cost of 
        $144,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $89,700,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $54,800,000.
            (8) Middle creek, lake county, california.--The project for 
        flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, Middle Creek, 
        Lake County, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        November 29, 2004, at a total cost of $45,200,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $29,500,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $15,700,000.
            (9) Napa river salt marsh, california.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for ecosystem 
                restoration, Napa River Salt Marsh, California: Report 
                of the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a 
                total cost of $134,500,000, with an estimated Federal 
                cost of $87,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
                of $47,000,000.
                    (B) Administration.--In carrying out the project 
                authorized by this paragraph, the Secretary shall--
                            (i) construct a recycled water pipeline 
                        extending from the Sonoma Valley County 
                        Sanitation District Waste Water Treatment Plant 
                        and the Napa Sanitation District Waste Water 
                        Treatment Plant to the project; and
                            (ii) restore or enhance Salt Ponds 1, 1A, 
                        2, and 3.
            (10) South platte river, denver, colorado.--The project for 
        ecosystem restoration, Denver County Reach, South Platte River, 
        Denver, Colorado: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated May 
        16, 2003, at a total cost of $20,100,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $13,065,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $7,035,000.
            (11) Comprehensive everglades restoration plan, central and 
        southern florida, site 1.--The project for ecosystem 
        restoration, Comprehensive Everglades restoration plan, central 
        and southern Florida, Site 1 impoundment project, Palm Beach 
        County, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        December 19, 2006, at a total cost of $80,840,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $40,420,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $40,420,000.
            (12) Indian river lagoon, south florida.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary may carry out the 
                project for ecosystem restoration, water supply, flood 
                control, and protection of water quality, Indian River 
                Lagoon, south Florida, at a total cost of 
                $1,365,000,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of 
                $682,500,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of 
                $682,500,000, in accordance with section 601 of the 
                Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
                2680) and the recommendations of the report of the 
                Chief of Engineers dated August 6, 2004.
                    (B) Deauthorizations.--As of the date of enactment 
                of this Act, the following projects are not authorized:
                            (i) The uncompleted portions of the project 
                        authorized by section 601(b)(2)(C)(i) of the 
                        Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
                        Stat. 2682), C-44 Basin Storage Reservoir of 
                        the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, 
                        at a total cost of $147,800,000, with an 
                        estimated Federal cost of $73,900,000 and an 
                        estimated non-Federal cost of $73,900,000.
                            (ii) The uncompleted portions of the 
                        project authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
                        Control Act of 1968 (Public Law 90-483; 82 
                        Stat. 740), Martin County, Florida, 
                        modifications to Central and South Florida 
                        Project, as contained in Senate Document 101, 
                        90th Congress, 2d Session, at a total cost of 
                        $15,471,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                        $8,073,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                        $7,398,000.
                            (iii) The uncompleted portions of the 
                        project authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
                        Control Act of 1968 (Public Law 90-483; 82 
                        Stat. 740), East Coast Backpumping, St. Lucie-
                        Martin County, Spillway Structure S-311 of the 
                        Central and South Florida Project, as contained 
                        in House Document 369, 90th Congress, 2d 
                        Session, at a total cost of $77,118,000, with 
                        an estimated Federal cost of $55,124,000 and an 
                        estimated non-Federal cost of $21,994,000.
            (13) Miami harbor, miami, florida.--The project for 
        navigation, Miami Harbor, Miami, Florida: Report of the Chief 
        of Engineers dated April 25, 2005, at a total cost of 
        $125,270,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $75,140,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $50,130,000.
            (14) Picayune strand, florida.--The project for ecosystem 
        restoration, Picayune Strand, Florida: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated September 15, 2005, at a total cost of 
        $375,330,000 with an estimated Federal cost of $187,665,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $187,665,000.
            (15) East st. louis and vicinity, illinois.--The project 
        for ecosystem restoration and recreation, East St. Louis and 
        Vicinity, Illinois: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        December 22, 2004, at a total cost of $208,260,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $134,910,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $73,350,000.
            (16) Peoria riverfront, illinois.--The project for 
        ecosystem restoration, Peoria Riverfront, Illinois: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated July 28, 2003, at a total cost of 
        $18,220,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,840,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,380,000.
            (17) Wood river levee system, illinois.--The project for 
        flood damage reduction, Wood River, Illinois: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated July 18, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $17,220,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,193,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,027,000.
            (18) Des moines and raccoon rivers, des moines, iowa.--The 
        project for flood damage reduction, Des Moines and Raccoon 
        Rivers, Des Moines, Iowa: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated March 28, 2006, at a total cost of $10,780,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $6,967,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $3,813,000.
            (19) Bayou sorrel lock, louisiana.--The project for 
        navigation, Bayou Sorrel Lock, Louisiana: Report of the Chief 
        of Engineers dated January 3, 2005, at a total cost of 
        $9,680,000. The costs of construction of the project are to be 
        paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the general fund of 
        the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the 
        Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
            (20) Morganza to the gulf of mexico, louisiana.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for hurricane and 
                storm damage reduction, Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico, 
                Louisiana: Reports of the Chief of Engineers dated 
                August 23, 2002, and July 22, 2003, at a total cost of 
                $886,700,000 with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $576,355,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $310,345,000.
                    (B) Operation and maintenance.--The operation, 
                maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of 
                the Houma Navigation Canal lock complex and the Gulf 
                Intracoastal Waterway floodgate features that provide 
                for inland waterway transportation shall be a Federal 
                responsibility, in accordance with section 102 of the 
                Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
                2212; Public Law 99-662).
            (21) Port of iberia, louisiana.--The project for 
        navigation, Port of Iberia, Louisiana: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated December 31, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $131,250,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $105,315,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $25,935,000, except that 
        the Secretary, in consultation with Vermillion and Iberia 
        Parishes, Louisiana, is directed to use available dredged 
        material and rock placement on the south bank of the Gulf 
        Intracoastal Waterway and the west bank of the Freshwater Bayou 
        Channel to provide incidental storm surge protection.
            (22) Poplar island expansion, maryland.--The project for 
        the beneficial use of dredged material at Poplar Island, 
        Maryland, authorized by section 537 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3776), and modified by 
        section 318 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
        Stat. 2678), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to 
        construct the expansion of the project in accordance with the 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated March 31, 2006, at an 
        additional total cost of $260,000,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $195,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $65,000,000.
            (23) Smith island, maryland.--The project for ecosystem 
        restoration, Smith Island, Maryland: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated October 29, 2001, at a total cost of 
        $15,580,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $10,127,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,453,000.
            (24) Roseau river, roseau, minnesota.--The project for 
        flood damage reduction, Roseau River, Roseau, Minnesota: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total 
        cost of $25,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $13,820,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,280,000.
            (25) Mississippi coastal improvement project, hancock, 
        harrison, and jackson counties, mississippi.--The project for 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, 
        Mississippi coastal improvement project, Hancock, Harrison, and 
        Jackson Counties, Mississippi: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated December 31, 2006, at a total cost of $107,690,000, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $70,000,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $37,690,000.
            (26) Argentine, east bottoms, fairfax-jersey creek, and 
        north kansas levees units, missouri river and tributaries at 
        kansas cities, missouri and kansas.--The project for flood 
        damage reduction, Argentine, East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey 
        Creek, and North Kansas Levees units, Missouri River and 
        tributaries at Kansas Cities, Missouri and Kansas: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 2006, at a total cost 
        of $65,430,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $42,530,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $22,900,000.
            (27) Swope park industrial area, missouri.--The project for 
        flood damage reduction, Swope Park Industrial Area, Missouri: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 30, 2003, at a 
        total cost of $16,980,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $11,037,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,943,000.
            (28) Great egg harbor inlet to townsends inlet, new 
        jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
        Great Egg Harbor Inlet to Townsends Inlet, New Jersey: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated October 24, 2006, at a total 
        cost of $54,360,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $35,069,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $19,291,000, 
        and at an estimated total cost of $202,500,000 for periodic 
        nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $101,250,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $101,250,000.
            (29) Hudson-raritan estuary, liberty state park, new 
        jersey.--The project for environmental restoration, Hudson 
        Raritan Estuary, Liberty State Park, New Jersey: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated August 25, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $34,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $22,200,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,900,000.
            (30) Manasquan to barnegat inlets, new jersey.--The project 
        for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Manasquan to Barnegat 
        Inlets, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        December 30, 2003, at a total cost of $71,900,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $46,735,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $25,165,000, and at an estimated total cost of 
        $119,680,000 for periodic beach nourishment over the 50-year 
        life of the project, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $59,840,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $59,840,000.
            (31) Raritan bay and sandy hook bay, union beach, new 
        jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
        Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, Union Beach, New Jersey: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated January 4, 2006, at a total 
        cost of $115,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $74,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $40,200,000, 
        and at an estimated total cost of $6,500,000 for periodic 
        nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $3,250,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $3,250,000.
            (32) South river, new jersey.--The project for hurricane 
        and storm damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, South 
        River, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 
        22, 2003, at a total cost of $122,300,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $79,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $42,800,000.
            (33) Southwest valley, albuquerque, new mexico.--The 
        project for flood damage reduction, Southwest Valley, 
        Albuquerque, New Mexico: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        November 29, 2004, at a total cost of $24,840,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $16,150,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $8,690,000.
            (34) Montauk point, new york.--The project for hurricane 
        and storm damage reduction, Montauk Point, New York: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated March 31, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $14,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,300,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,300,000.
            (35) Hocking river basin, monday creek, ohio.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for ecosystem 
                restoration, Hocking River Basin, Monday Creek, Ohio: 
                Report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 24, 2006, 
                at a total cost of $20,980,000, with an estimated 
                Federal cost of $13,440,000 and an estimated non-
                Federal cost of $7,540,000.
                    (B) Wayne national forest.--
                            (i) In general.--The Secretary, in 
                        cooperation with the Secretary of Agriculture, 
                        may construct other project features on 
                        property that is located in the Wayne National 
                        Forest, Ohio, owned by the United States and 
                        managed by the Forest Service as described in 
                        the report of the Corps of Engineers entitled 
                        ``Hocking River Basin, Ohio, Monday Creek Sub-
                        Basin Ecosystem Restoration Project Feasibility 
                        Report and Environmental Assessment''.
                            (ii) Cost.--Each project feature carried 
                        out on Federal land shall be designed, 
                        constructed, operated, and maintained at full 
                        Federal expense.
                            (iii) Authorization of appropriations.--
                        There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
                        out this subparagraph $1,270,000.
            (36) Bloomsburg, pennsylvania.--The project for flood 
        damage reduction, Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania: Report of the Chief 
        of Engineers dated January 25, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $44,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $28,925,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $15,575,000
            (37) Pawleys island, south carolina.--The project for 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction, Pawleys Island, South 
        Carolina: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 19, 
        2006, at a total cost of $8,980,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $5,840,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $3,140,000, and at an estimated total cost of $21,200,000 for 
        periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $10,600,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $10,600,000.
            (38) Corpus christi ship channel, corpus christi, texas.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for navigation and 
                ecosystem restoration, Corpus Christi Ship Channel, 
                Texas, Channel Improvement Project: Report of the Chief 
                of Engineers dated June 2, 2003, at a total cost of 
                $188,110,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $87,810,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $100,300,000.
                    (B) Navigational servitude.--In carrying out the 
                project under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall 
                enforce navigational servitude in the Corpus Christi 
                Ship Channel, including, at the sole expense of the 
                owner of the facility, the removal or relocation of any 
                facility obstructing the project.
            (39) Gulf intracoastal waterway, brazos river to port 
        o'connor, matagorda bay re-route, texas.--The project for 
        navigation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Brazos River to Port 
        O'Connor, Matagorda Bay Re-Route, Texas: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated December 24, 2002, at a total cost of 
        $17,280,000. The costs of construction of the project are to be 
        paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the general fund of 
        the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the 
        Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
            (40) Gulf intracoastal waterway, high island to brazos 
        river, texas.--The project for navigation, Gulf Intracoastal 
        Waterway, Sabine River to Corpus Christi, Texas: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated April 16, 2004, at a total cost of 
        $14,450,000. The costs of construction of the project are to be 
        paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the general fund of 
        the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the 
        Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
            (41) Lower colorado river basin phase i, texas.--The 
        project for flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, 
        Lower Colorado River Basin Phase I, Texas: Report of the Chief 
        of Engineers dated December 31, 2006, at a total cost of 
        $110,730,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $69,640,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $41,090,000.
            (42) Craney island eastward expansion, virginia.--The 
        project for navigation, Craney Island Eastward Expansion, 
        Virginia: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 24, 
        2006, at a total cost of $712,103,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $31,229,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $680,874,000.
            (43) Deep creek, chesapeake, virginia.--The project for the 
        Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Bridge Replacement, Deep Creek, 
        Chesapeake, Virginia: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        March 3, 2003, at a total cost of $37,200,000.
            (44) Chehalis river, centralia, washington.--The project 
        for flood damage reduction, Centralia, Washington, authorized 
        by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4126)--
                    (A) is modified to be carried out at a total cost 
                of $123,770,000, with a Federal cost of $74,740,000, 
                and a non-Federal cost of $49,030,000; and
                    (B) shall be carried out by the Secretary 
                substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject 
                to the conditions, recommended in the final report of 
                the Chief of Engineers dated September 27, 2004.

SEC. 1002. ENHANCED NAVIGATION CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS AND ECOSYSTEM 
              RESTORATION PLAN FOR UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS 
              WATERWAY SYSTEM.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Plan.--The term ``Plan'' means the project for 
        navigation and ecosystem improvements for the Upper Mississippi 
        River and Illinois Waterway System: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated December 15, 2004.
            (2) Upper mississippi river and illinois waterway system.--
        The term ``Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway 
        System'' means the projects for navigation and ecosystem 
        restoration authorized by Congress for--
                    (A) the segment of the Mississippi River from the 
                confluence with the Ohio River, River Mile 0.0, to 
                Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock in Minneapolis-St. Paul, 
                Minnesota, River Mile 854.0; and
                    (B) the Illinois Waterway from its confluence with 
                the Mississippi River at Grafton, Illinois, River Mile 
                0.0, to T.J. O'Brien Lock in Chicago, Illinois, River 
                Mile 327.0.
    (b) Authorization of Construction of Navigation Improvements.--
            (1) Small scale and nonstructural measures.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall, in general 
                conformance with the Plan--
                            (i) construct mooring facilities at Locks 
                        12, 14, 18, 20, 22, 24, and LaGrange Lock;
                            (ii) provide switchboats at Locks 20 
                        through 25; and
                            (iii) conduct development and testing of an 
                        appointment scheduling system.
                    (B) Authorization of appropriations.--The total 
                cost of the projects authorized under this paragraph 
                shall be $256,000,000. The costs of construction of the 
                projects shall be paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated 
                from the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ from 
                amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust 
                Fund. Such sums shall remain available until expended.
            (2) New locks.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall, in general 
                conformance with the Plan, construct new 1,200-foot 
                locks at Locks 20, 21, 22, 24, and 25 on the Upper 
                Mississippi River and at LaGrange Lock and Peoria Lock 
                on the Illinois Waterway.
                    (B) Mitigation.--The Secretary shall conduct 
                mitigation for the new locks and small scale and 
                nonstructural measures authorized under paragraphs (1) 
                and (2).
                    (C) Concurrence.--The mitigation required under 
                subparagraph (B) for the projects authorized under 
                paragraphs (1) and (2), including any acquisition of 
                lands or interests in lands, shall be undertaken or 
                acquired concurrently with lands and interests for the 
                projects authorized under paragraphs (1) and (2), and 
                physical construction required for the purposes of 
                mitigation shall be undertaken concurrently with the 
                physical construction of such projects.
                    (D) Authorization of appropriations.--The total 
                cost of the projects authorized under this paragraph 
                shall be $1,948,000,000. The costs of construction on 
                the projects shall be paid \1/2\ from amounts 
                appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and 
                \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the Inland 
                Waterways Trust Fund. Such sums shall remain available 
                until expended.
    (c) Ecosystem Restoration Authorization.--
            (1) Operation.--To ensure the environmental sustainability 
        of the existing Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway 
        System, the Secretary shall modify, consistent with 
        requirements to avoid adverse effects on navigation, the 
        operation of the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway 
        System to address the cumulative environmental impacts of 
        operation of the system and improve the ecological integrity of 
        the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois River.
            (2) Ecosystem restoration projects.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out, 
                consistent with requirements to avoid adverse effects 
                on navigation, ecosystem restoration projects to attain 
                and maintain the sustainability of the ecosystem of the 
                Upper Mississippi River and Illinois River in 
                accordance with the general framework outlined in the 
                Plan.
                    (B) Projects included.--Ecosystem restoration 
                projects may include, but are not limited to--
                            (i) island building;
                            (ii) construction of fish passages;
                            (iii) floodplain restoration;
                            (iv) water level management (including 
                        water drawdown);
                            (v) backwater restoration;
                            (vi) side channel restoration;
                            (vii) wing dam and dike restoration and 
                        modification;
                            (viii) island and shoreline protection;
                            (ix) topographical diversity;
                            (x) dam point control;
                            (xi) use of dredged material for 
                        environmental purposes;
                            (xii) tributary confluence restoration;
                            (xiii) spillway, dam, and levee 
                        modification to benefit the environment;
                            (xiv) land easement authority; and
                            (xv) land acquisition.
                    (C) Cost sharing.--
                            (i) In general.--Except as provided in 
                        clauses (ii) and (iii), the Federal share of 
                        the cost of carrying out an ecosystem 
                        restoration project under this paragraph shall 
                        be 65 percent.
                            (ii) Exception for certain restoration 
                        projects.--In the case of a project under this 
                        subparagraph for ecosystem restoration, the 
                        Federal share of the cost of carrying out the 
                        project shall be 100 percent if the project--
                                    (I) is located below the ordinary 
                                high water mark or in a connected 
                                backwater;
                                    (II) modifies the operation or 
                                structures for navigation; or
                                    (III) is located on federally owned 
                                land.
                            (iii) Savings clause.--Nothing in this 
                        paragraph affects the applicability of section 
                        906(e) of the Water Resources Development Act 
                        of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283).
                            (iv) Nongovernmental organizations.--
                        Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the Flood 
                        Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5(b)), for 
                        any project carried out under this section, a 
                        non-Federal sponsor may include a nonprofit 
                        entity, with the consent of the affected local 
                        government.
                    (D) Land acquisition.--The Secretary may acquire 
                land or an interest in land for an ecosystem 
                restoration project from a willing owner through 
                conveyance of--
                            (i) fee title to the land; or
                            (ii) a flood plain conservation easement.
            (3) Ecosystem restoration preconstruction engineering and 
        design.--
                    (A) Restoration design.--Before initiating the 
                construction of any individual ecosystem restoration 
                project, the Secretary shall--
                            (i) establish ecosystem restoration goals 
                        and identify specific performance measures 
                        designed to demonstrate ecosystem restoration;
                            (ii) establish the without-project 
                        condition or baseline for each performance 
                        indicator; and
                            (iii) for each separable element of the 
                        ecosystem restoration, identify specific target 
                        goals for each performance indicator.
                    (B) Outcomes.--Performance measures identified 
                under subparagraph (A)(i) should comprise specific 
                measurable environmental outcomes, such as changes in 
                water quality, hydrology, or the well-being of 
                indicator species the population and distribution of 
                which are representative of the abundance and diversity 
                of ecosystem-dependent aquatic and terrestrial species.
                    (C) Restoration design.--Restoration design carried 
                out as part of ecosystem restoration shall include a 
                monitoring plan for the performance measures identified 
                under subparagraph (A)(i), including--
                            (i) a timeline to achieve the identified 
                        target goals; and
                            (ii) a timeline for the demonstration of 
                        project completion.
            (4) Specific projects authorization.--
                    (A) In general.--There is authorized to be 
                appropriated to carry out this subsection 
                $1,717,000,000, of which not more than $245,000,000 
                shall be available for projects described in paragraph 
                (2)(B)(ii) and not more than $48,000,000 shall be 
                available for projects described in paragraph 
                (2)(B)(x). Such sums shall remain available until 
                expended.
                    (B) Limitation on available funds.--Of the amounts 
                made available under subparagraph (A), not more than 
                $35,000,000 for each fiscal year shall be available for 
                land acquisition under paragraph (2)(D).
                    (C) Individual project limit.--Other than for 
                projects described in clauses (ii) and (x) of paragraph 
                (2)(B), the total cost of any single project carried 
                out under this subsection shall not exceed $25,000,000.
            (5) Implementation reports.--
                    (A) In general.--Not later than June 30, 2008, and 
                every 5 years thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to 
                the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
                Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure of the House of Representatives an 
                implementation report that--
                            (i) includes baselines, milestones, goals, 
                        and priorities for ecosystem restoration 
                        projects; and
                            (ii) measures the progress in meeting the 
                        goals.
                    (B) Advisory panel.--
                            (i) In general.--The Secretary shall 
                        appoint and convene an advisory panel to 
                        provide independent guidance in the development 
                        of each implementation report under 
                        subparagraph (A).
                            (ii) Panel members.--Panel members shall 
                        include--
                                    (I) 1 representative of each of the 
                                State resource agencies (or a designee 
                                of the Governor of the State) from each 
                                of the States of Illinois, Iowa, 
                                Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin;
                                    (II) 1 representative of the 
                                Department of Agriculture;
                                    (III) 1 representative of the 
                                Department of Transportation;
                                    (IV) 1 representative of the United 
                                States Geological Survey;
                                    (V) 1 representative of the United 
                                States Fish and Wildlife Service;
                                    (VI) 1 representative of the 
                                Environmental Protection Agency;
                                    (VII) 1 representative of affected 
                                landowners;
                                    (VIII) 2 representatives of 
                                conservation and environmental advocacy 
                                groups; and
                                    (IX) 2 representatives of 
                                agriculture and industry advocacy 
                                groups.
                            (iii) Chairperson.--The Secretary shall 
                        serve as chairperson of the advisory panel.
                            (iv) Nonapplicability of faca.--The Federal 
                        Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall 
                        not apply to the Advisory Panel or any working 
                        group established by the Advisory Panel.
            (6) Ranking system.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation 
                with the Advisory Panel, shall develop a system to rank 
                proposed projects.
                    (B) Priority.--The ranking system shall give 
                greater weight to projects that restore natural river 
                processes, including those projects listed in paragraph 
                (2)(B).
    (d) Comparable Progress.--
            (1) In general.--As the Secretary conducts pre-engineering, 
        design, and construction for projects authorized under this 
        section, the Secretary shall--
                    (A) select appropriate milestones; and
                    (B) determine, at the time of such selection, 
                whether the projects are being carried out at 
                comparable rates.
            (2) No comparable rate.--If the Secretary determines under 
        paragraph (1)(B) that projects authorized under this subsection 
        are not moving toward completion at a comparable rate, annual 
        funding requests for the projects will be adjusted to ensure 
        that the projects move toward completion at a comparable rate 
        in the future.

SEC. 1003. LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a program for 
ecosystem restoration, Louisiana Coastal Area, Louisiana, substantially 
in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, dated January 
31, 2005.
    (b) Priorities.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out the program under 
        subsection (a), the Secretary shall give priority to--
                    (A) any portion of the program identified in the 
                report described in subsection (a) as a critical 
                restoration feature;
                    (B) any Mississippi River diversion project that--
                            (i) protects a major population area of the 
                        Pontchartrain, Pearl, Breton Sound, Barataria, 
                        or Terrebonne Basin; and
                            (ii) produces an environmental benefit to 
                        the coastal area of the State of Louisiana; and
                    (C) any barrier island, or barrier shoreline, 
                project that--
                            (i) is carried out in conjunction with a 
                        Mississippi River diversion project; and
                            (ii) protects a major population area.
    (c) Modifications.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out the program under 
        subsection (a), the Secretary is authorized to make 
        modifications as necessary to the 5 near-term critical 
        ecosystem restoration features identified in the report 
        referred to in subsection (a), due to the impact of Hurricanes 
        Katrina and Rita on the project areas.
            (2) Integration.--The Secretary shall ensure that the 
        modifications under paragraph (1) are fully integrated with the 
        analysis and design of comprehensive hurricane protection 
        authorized by title I of the Energy and Water Development 
        Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103; 119 Stat. 2247).
            (3) Construction.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to 
                construct the 5 near-term critical ecosystem 
                restoration features, as modified under this 
                subsection.
                    (B) Reports.--Before beginning construction of the 
                projects, the Secretary shall submit a report 
                documenting any modifications to the 5 near-term 
                critical projects, including cost changes, to the 
                Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate 
                and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
                of the House of Representatives.
            (4) Applicability of other provisions.--Section 902 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280) shall 
        not apply to the 5 near-term critical projects authorized by 
        this subsection.
    (d) Demonstration Program.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out the program under 
        subsection (a), the Secretary is authorized to conduct a 
        demonstration program within the applicable project area to 
        evaluate new technologies and the applicability of the 
        technologies to the program.
            (2) Cost limitation.--The cost of an individual project 
        under this subsection shall be not more than $25,000,000.
    (e) Beneficial Use of Dredged Material.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out the program under 
        subsection (a), the Secretary is authorized to use such sums as 
        are necessary to conduct a program for the beneficial use of 
        dredged material.
            (2) Consideration.--In carrying out the program under 
        subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider the beneficial use 
        of sediment from the Illinois River System for wetlands 
        restoration in wetlands-depleted watersheds.
    (f) Reports.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than December 31, 2008, the 
        Secretary shall submit to Congress feasibility reports--
                    (A) on the features included in table 3 of the 
                report referred to in subsection (a); and
                    (B) that are consistent with the estimates in the 
                table, subject to section 902 of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4183).
            (2) Projects identified in reports.--
                    (A) Construction.--The Secretary is authorized to 
                construct the projects identified in the reports 
                substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject 
                to the conditions, recommended in a final report of the 
                Chief of Engineers, if a favorable report of the Chief 
                is completed by not later than December 31, 2010.
                    (B) Requirement.--No appropriations shall be made 
                to construct any project under this subsection if the 
                report under paragraph (1) has not been approved by 
                resolutions adopted by the Committee on Environment and 
                Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
                Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
                Representatives.
    (g) Nongovernmental Organizations.--
            (1) In general.--A nongovernmental organization shall be 
        eligible to contribute all or a portion of the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of a project under this section.
            (2) Use of funds from other programs.--The non-Federal 
        interest for a study or project conducted under this section 
        may use, and the Secretary shall accept, funds provided by a 
        Federal agency under any other Federal program, to satisfy, in 
        whole or in part, the non-Federal share of the study or 
        project, if the head of the Federal agency certifies that the 
        funds may be used for that purpose.
    (h) Comprehensive Plan.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in coordination with the 
        Governor of the State of Louisiana, shall--
                    (A) develop a plan for protecting, preserving, and 
                restoring the coastal Louisiana ecosystem;
                    (B) not later than 1 year after the date of 
                enactment of this Act, and every 5 years thereafter, 
                submit to Congress the plan, or an update of the plan; 
                and
                    (C) ensure that the plan is fully integrated with 
                the analysis and design of comprehensive hurricane 
                protection authorized by title I of the Energy and 
                Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 
                109-103; 119 Stat. 2247).
            (2) Inclusions.--The comprehensive plan shall include a 
        description of--
                    (A) the framework of a long-term program that 
                provides for the comprehensive protection, 
                conservation, and restoration of the wetlands, 
                estuaries (including the Barataria-Terrebonne estuary), 
                barrier islands, shorelines, and related land and 
                features of the coastal Louisiana ecosystem, including 
                protection of a critical resource, habitat, or 
                infrastructure from the effects of a coastal storm, a 
                hurricane, erosion, or subsidence;
                    (B) the means by which a new technology, or an 
                improved technique, can be integrated into the program 
                under subsection (a);
                    (C) the role of other Federal agencies and programs 
                in carrying out the program under subsection (a); and
                    (D) specific, measurable ecological success 
                criteria by which success of the comprehensive plan 
                shall be measured.
            (3) Consideration.--In developing the comprehensive plan, 
        the Secretary shall consider the advisability of integrating 
        into the program under subsection (a)--
                    (A) a related Federal or State project carried out 
                on the date on which the plan is developed;
                    (B) an activity in the Louisiana Coastal Area; or
                    (C) any other project or activity identified in--
                            (i) the Mississippi River and Tributaries 
                        program;
                            (ii) the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands 
                        Conservation Plan;
                            (iii) the Louisiana Coastal Zone Management 
                        Plan;
                            (iv) the plan of the State of Louisiana 
                        entitled ``Coast 2050: Toward a Sustainable 
                        Coastal Louisiana''; or
                            (v) the Comprehensive Master Coastal 
                        Protection Plan authorized and defined by Act 8 
                        of the First Extraordinary Session of the 
                        Louisiana State Legislature, 2005.
    (i) Task Force.--
            (1) Establishment.--There is established a task force to be 
        known as the ``Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem Protection and 
        Restoration Task Force'' (referred to in this subsection as the 
        ``Task Force'').
            (2) Membership.--The Task Force shall consist of the 
        following members (or, in the case of the head of a Federal 
        agency, a designee at the level of Assistant Secretary or an 
        equivalent level):
                    (A) The Secretary.
                    (B) The Secretary of the Interior.
                    (C) The Secretary of Commerce.
                    (D) The Administrator of the Environmental 
                Protection Agency.
                    (E) The Secretary of Agriculture.
                    (F) The Secretary of Transportation.
                    (G) The Secretary of Energy.
                    (H) The Secretary of Homeland Security.
                    (I) 3 representatives of the State of Louisiana 
                appointed by the Governor of that State.
            (3) Duties.--The Task Force shall make recommendations to 
        the Secretary regarding--
                    (A) policies, strategies, plans, programs, 
                projects, and activities for addressing conservation, 
                protection, restoration, and maintenance of the coastal 
                Louisiana ecosystem;
                    (B) financial participation by each agency 
                represented on the Task Force in conserving, 
                protecting, restoring, and maintaining the coastal 
                Louisiana ecosystem, including recommendations--
                            (i) that identify funds from current agency 
                        missions and budgets; and
                            (ii) for coordinating individual agency 
                        budget requests; and
                    (C) the comprehensive plan under subsection (h).
            (4) Working groups.--
                    (A) In general.--The Task Force may establish such 
                working groups as the Task Force determines to be 
                necessary to assist the Task Force in carrying out this 
                subsection.
                    (B) Integration team.--
                            (i) In general.--The Task Force shall 
                        establish, for the purposes described in clause 
                        (ii), an integration team comprised of--
                                    (I) independent experts with 
                                experience relating to--
                                            (aa) coastal estuaries;
                                            (bb) diversions;
                                            (cc) coastal restoration;
                                            (dd) wetlands protection;
                                            (ee) ecosystem restoration;
                                            (ff) hurricane protection;
                                            (gg) storm damage reduction 
                                        systems; and
                                            (hh) navigation and ports; 
                                        and
                                    (II) representatives of--
                                            (aa) the State of 
                                        Louisiana; and
                                            (bb) local governments in 
                                        southern Louisiana.
                            (ii) Purposes.--The purposes referred to in 
                        clause (i) are--
                                    (I) to advise the Task Force and 
                                the Secretary regarding opportunities 
                                to integrate the planning, engineering, 
                                design, implementation, and performance 
                                of Corps of Engineers projects for 
                                hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
                                flood damage reduction, ecosystem 
                                restoration, and navigation in areas of 
                                Louisiana declared to be a major 
                                disaster as a result of Hurricane 
                                Katrina or Rita;
                                    (II) to review reports relating to 
                                the performance of, and recommendations 
                                relating to the future performance of, 
                                the hurricane, coastal, and flood 
                                protection systems in southern 
                                Louisiana, including the reports issued 
                                by the Interagency Performance 
                                Evaluation Team, the National Science 
                                Foundation, the American Society of 
                                Civil Engineers, and Team Louisiana to 
                                advise the Task Force and the Secretary 
                                on opportunities to improve the 
                                performance of the protection systems; 
                                and
                                    (III) to carry out such other 
                                duties as the Task Force or the 
                                Secretary determine to be appropriate.
            (5) Nonapplicability of faca.--The Federal Advisory 
        Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the Task Force 
        or any working group of the Task Force.
    (j) Science and Technology.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a coastal 
        Louisiana ecosystem science and technology program.
            (2) Purposes.--The purposes of the program established by 
        paragraph (1) shall be--
                    (A) to identify any uncertainty relating to the 
                physical, chemical, geological, biological, and 
                cultural baseline conditions in coastal Louisiana;
                    (B) to improve knowledge of the physical, chemical, 
                geological, biological, and cultural baseline 
                conditions in coastal Louisiana; and
                    (C) to identify and develop technologies, models, 
                and methods to carry out this subsection.
            (3) Working groups.--The Secretary may establish such 
        working groups as the Secretary determines to be necessary to 
        assist the Secretary in carrying out this subsection.
            (4) Contracts and cooperative agreements.--In carrying out 
        this subsection, the Secretary may enter into a contract or 
        cooperative agreement with an individual or entity (including a 
        consortium of academic institutions in Louisiana) with 
        scientific or engineering expertise in the restoration of 
        aquatic and marine ecosystems for coastal restoration and 
        enhancement through science and technology.
    (k) Analysis of Benefits.--
            (1) In general.--Notwithstanding section 209 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2) or any other provision 
        of law, in carrying out an activity to conserve, protect, 
        restore, or maintain the coastal Louisiana ecosystem, the 
        Secretary may determine that the environmental benefits 
        provided by the program under this section outweigh the 
        disadvantage of an activity under this section.
            (2) Determination of cost-effectiveness.--If the Secretary 
        determines that an activity under this section is cost-
        effective, no further economic justification for the activity 
        shall be required.
    (l) Studies.--
            (1) Degradation.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in consultation with the 
        non-Federal interest, shall enter into a contract with the 
        National Academy of Sciences under which the National Academy 
        of Sciences shall carry out a study to identify--
                    (A) the cause of any degradation of the Louisiana 
                Coastal Area ecosystem that occurred as a result of an 
                activity approved by the Secretary; and
                    (B) the sources of the degradation.
            (2) Financing.--On completion, and taking into account the 
        results, of the study conducted under paragraph (1), the 
        Secretary, in consultation with the non-Federal interest, shall 
        study--
                    (A) financing alternatives for the program under 
                subsection (a); and
                    (B) potential reductions in the expenditure of 
                Federal funds in emergency responses that would occur 
                as a result of ecosystem restoration in the Louisiana 
                Coastal Area.
    (m) Project Modifications.--
            (1) Review.--The Secretary, in cooperation with any non-
        Federal interest, shall review each federally-authorized water 
        resources project in the coastal Louisiana area in existence on 
        the date of enactment of this Act to determine whether--
                    (A) each project is in accordance with the program 
                under subsection (a); and
                    (B) the project could contribute to ecosystem 
                restoration under subsection (a) through modification 
                of the operations or features of the project.
            (2) Modifications.--Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4), the 
        Secretary may carry out the modifications described in 
        paragraph (1)(B).
            (3) Public notice and comment.--Before completing the 
        report required under paragraph (4), the Secretary shall 
        provide an opportunity for public notice and comment.
            (4) Report.--
                    (A) In general.--Before modifying an operation or 
                feature of a project under paragraph (1)(B), the 
                Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment 
                and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
                Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
                Representatives a report describing the modification.
                    (B) Inclusion.--A report under subparagraph (A) 
                shall include such information relating to the timeline 
                and cost of a modification as the Secretary determines 
                to be relevant.
            (5) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $10,000,000.
    (n) Louisiana Water Resources Council.--The Secretary shall 
establish a council, to be known as the ``Louisiana Water Resources 
Council'', which shall serve as the exclusive peer review panel for 
activities conducted by the Corps of Engineers in the areas in the 
State of Louisiana declared as major disaster areas in accordance with 
section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) in response to Hurricane Katrina or 
Rita of 2005, in accordance with the requirements of section 2007.
    (o) External Review.--The Secretary shall enter into a contract 
with the National Academy of Science to perform an external review of 
the demonstration program under subsection (d), and the results of the 
review shall be submitted to the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
    (p) New Orleans and Vicinity.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized--
                    (A) to raise levee heights as necessary, and to 
                otherwise enhance the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity 
                Project and the West Bank and Vicinity Project to 
                provide the levels of protection necessary to achieve 
                the certification required for the 100-year level of 
                flood protection, in accordance with the National Flood 
                Insurance Program under the base flood elevations 
                current at the time of the construction;
                    (B) to modify the 17th Street, Orleans Avenue, and 
                London Avenue drainage canals, including installing 
                pumps and closure structures at or near the lakefront 
                at Lake Pontchartrain;
                    (C) to armor critical elements of the New Orleans 
                hurricane and storm damage reduction system;
                    (D) to improve and otherwise modify the Inner 
                Harbor Navigation Canal to increase the reliability of 
                the flood protection system for the city of New 
                Orleans;
                    (E) to replace or modify certain non-Federal levees 
                in Plaquemines Parish to incorporate the levees into 
                the New Orleans to Venice Hurricane Protection Project;
                    (F) to reinforce or replace flood walls in the 
                existing Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Project and 
                the existing West Bank and Vicinity Project to improve 
                performance of the flood protection systems;
                    (G) to perform onetime storm-proofing of interior 
                pump stations to ensure the operability of the stations 
                during hurricanes, storms, and high-water events;
                    (H) to repair, replace, modify, and improve non-
                Federal levees and associated protection measures in 
                Terrebonne Parish; and
                    (I) to reduce the risk of storm damage to the 
                greater New Orleans metropolitan area by restoring the 
                surrounding wetlands through--
                            (i) measures to begin to reverse wetland 
                        losses in areas affected by navigation, oil and 
                        gas exploration and extraction, and other 
                        channels; and
                            (ii) modification of the Caernarvon 
                        Freshwater Diversion structure or its 
                        operations.
            (2) Funding authority.--An activity under paragraph (1) 
        shall be carried out in accordance with the cost-sharing 
        requirements of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act 
        for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 
        2006 (Public Law 109-234; 120 Stat. 418).
            (3) Conditions.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall submit to the 
                Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate 
                and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
                of the House of Representatives a notice in any case in 
                which an estimate for the expenditure of funds on any 
                project or activity described in paragraph (1) exceeds 
                the amount specified for that project or activity in 
                the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for 
                Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane 
                Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109-234; 120 Stat. 418).
                    (B) Appropriations limitation.--No appropriation in 
                excess of an amount equal to 25 percent more than the 
                amount specified for a project or activity in that Act 
                shall be made until an increase in the level of 
                expenditure has been approved by resolutions adopted by 
                the Committees referred to in subparagraph (A).
    (q) Larose to Golden Meadow.--
            (1) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives a report describing any modification required 
        to the project for flood damage reduction, Larose to Golden 
        Meadow, Louisiana, to achieve the certification necessary for 
        participation in the National Flood Insurance Program.
            (2) Modifications.--The Secretary is authorized to carry 
        out a modification described in paragraph (1) if--
                    (A) the Secretary submits a recommendation for 
                authorization of the modification in the report under 
                paragraph (1); and
                    (B) the total cost of the modification does not 
                exceed $90,000,000.
            (3) Requirement.--No appropriation shall be made to 
        construct any modification under this subsection if the report 
        under paragraph (1) has not been approved by resolutions 
        adopted by the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
        Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
        of the House of Representatives.
            (4) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit to the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project under this subsection any 
        amount otherwise eligible to be credited under section 221 of 
        the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) (as amended 
        by section 2001).
    (r) Consolidation.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may consolidate the flood 
        damage reduction projects in Lower Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, 
        that have been identified for implementation under section 205 
        of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) as of the 
        date of enactment of this Act.
            (2) Total cost.--The Secretary may implement the 
        consolidated project referred to in paragraph (1) if the total 
        cost of the consolidated project does not exceed $100,000,000.
    (s) Mississippi River Gulf Outlet.--
            (1) Deauthorization.--
                    (A) In general.--Effective beginning on the date of 
                submission of the plan required under subparagraph (C), 
                the navigation channel portion of the project for 
                navigation, Mississippi River Gulf outlet, authorized 
                by the Act of March 29, 1956 (70 Stat. 65, chapter 
                112;100 Stat. 4177; 110 Stat. 3717), which extends from 
                the Gulf of Mexico to Mile 60 at the southern bank of 
                the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, is not authorized.
                    (B) Scope.--Nothing in this paragraph modifies or 
                deauthorizes the Inner Harbor navigation canal 
                replacement project authorized by that Act.
                    (C) Closure and restoration plan.--
                            (i) In general.--Not later than 180 days 
                        after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
                        Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
                        Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
                        the Committee on Transportation and 
                        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
                        a final report on the deauthorization of the 
                        Mississippi River Gulf outlet, as described 
                        under the heading ``Investigations'' under 
                        chapter 3 of title II of the Emergency 
                        Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, 
                        the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane 
                        Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109-234; 120 Stat. 
                        453).
                            (ii) Inclusions.--At a minimum, the report 
                        under clause (i) shall include--
                                    (I) a comprehensive plan to 
                                deauthorize navigation on the 
                                Mississippi River Gulf outlet;
                                    (II) a plan to physically modify 
                                the Mississippi River Gulf outlet and 
                                restore the areas affected by the 
                                navigation channel;
                                    (III) a plan to restore natural 
                                features of the ecosystem that will 
                                reduce or prevent damage from storm 
                                surge;
                                    (IV) a plan to prevent the 
                                intrusion of saltwater into the 
                                waterway;
                                    (V) efforts to integrate the 
                                recommendations of this report with the 
                                program authorized under subsection (a) 
                                and the analysis and design authorized 
                                by title I of the Energy and Water 
                                Develop Appropriations Act, 2006 
                                (Public Law 109-103; 119 Stat. 2247); 
                                and
                                    (VI) consideration of--
                                            (aa) use of native 
                                        vegetation; and
                                            (bb) diversions of fresh 
                                        water to restore the Lake 
                                        Borgne ecosystem.
                    (D) Construction.--The Secretary shall carry out a 
                plan to close the Mississippi River Gulf outlet and 
                restore and protect the ecosystem substantially in 
                accordance with the plan required under subparagraph 
                (C), if the Secretary determines that the project is 
                cost-effective, environmentally acceptable, and 
                technically feasible.
    (t) Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction.--With respect to the 
projects identified in the analysis and design of comprehensive 
hurricane protection authorized by title I of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103; 119 Stat. 
2247), the Secretary shall--
            (1) to the maximum extent practicable, submit specific 
        project recommendations in any report developed under that Act; 
        and
            (2) submit the reports to the Committee on Environment and 
        Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation 
        and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
    (u) Emergency Procedures.--
            (1) In general.--If the President determines that a feature 
        recommended in the analysis and design of comprehensive 
        hurricane protection under title I of the Energy and Water 
        Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103; 119 
        Stat. 2447), could--
                    (A) address an imminent threat to life and 
                property;
                    (B) prevent a dangerous storm surge from reaching a 
                populated area;
                    (C) prevent the loss of coastal areas that reduce 
                the impact of storm surge;
                    (D) benefit national energy security;
                    (E) protect emergency hurricane evacuation routes 
                or shelters; or
                    (F) address inconsistencies in hurricane protection 
                standards;
        the President may submit to the Speaker of the House of 
        Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate for 
        authorization a legislative proposal relating to the feature, 
        as the President determines to be appropriate.
            (2) Prioritization.--In submitting legislative proposals 
        under paragraph (1), the President shall give highest priority 
        to any project that, as determined by the President, would--
                    (A) to the maximum extent practicable, reduce the 
                risk--
                            (i) of loss of human life;
                            (ii) to public safety; and
                            (iii) of damage to property; and
                    (B) minimize costs and environmental impacts.
            (3) Expedited consideration.--
                    (A) In general.--Beginning after December 31, 2008, 
                any legislative proposal submitted by the President 
                under paragraph (1) shall be eligible for expedited 
                consideration in accordance with this paragraph.
                    (B) Introduction.--As soon as practicable after the 
                date of receipt of a legislative proposal under 
                paragraph (1), the Chairman of the Committee on 
                Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
                Chairman of the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure of the House of Representatives shall 
                introduce the proposal as a bill, by request, in the 
                Senate or the House of Representatives, as applicable.
                    (C) Referral.--A bill introduced under subparagraph 
                (B) shall be referred to the Committee on Environment 
                and Public Works of the Senate and as applicable the 
                Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
                House of Representatives.
                    (D) Committee consideration.--
                            (i) In general.--Not later than 45 
                        legislative days after a bill under 
                        subparagraph (B) is referred to a Committee in 
                        accordance with subparagraph (C), the Committee 
                        shall act on the bill.
                            (ii) Failure to act.--If a Committee fails 
                        to act on a bill by the date specified in 
                        clause (i), the bill shall be discharged from 
                        the Committee and placed on the calendar of the 
                        Senate or the House of Representatives, as 
                        applicable.
                    (E) Senate floor consideration.--
                            (i) In general.--Floor consideration in the 
                        Senate regarding a bill introduced under 
                        subparagraph (B) shall be limited to 20 hours, 
                        to be equally divided between the Majority 
                        Leader and the Minority Leader of the Senate 
                        (or a designee).
                            (ii) Nongermane amendments.--An amendment 
                        that is nongermane to a bill introduced under 
                        subparagraph (B) shall not be in order.
            (4) Effective date.--This requirements of, and authorities 
        under, this subsection shall expire on December 31, 2010.

SEC. 1004. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s):
            (1) Cache river basin, grubbs, arkansas.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Cache River Basin, Grubbs, Arkansas.
            (2) Bibb county and the city of macon levee, georgia.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, Bibb County and the City of 
        Macon Levee, Georgia.
            (3) Fort wayne and vicinity, indiana.--Project for flood 
        control, St. Mary's River, Fort Wayne and Vicinity, Indiana.
            (4) Salem, massachusetts.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Salem, Massachusetts.
            (5) Crow river, rockford, minnesota.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Crow River, Rockford, Minnesota.
            (6) South branch of the wild rice river, borup, 
        minnesota.--Project for flood damage reduction, South Branch of 
        the Wild Rice River, Borup, Minnesota.
            (7) Cheyenne, wyoming.--Project for flood control, Capitol 
        Basin, Cheyenne, Wyoming.

SEC. 1005. SMALL PROJECTS FOR NAVIGATION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
            (1) Barrow harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, Barrow 
        Harbor, Alaska.
            (2) Nome harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, Nome 
        Harbor, Alaska.
            (3) Old harbor, alaska.--Project for navigation, Old 
        Harbor, Alaska.
            (4) Little rock port, arkansas.--Project for navigation, 
        Little Rock Port, Arkansas River, Arkansas.
            (5) East basin, massachusetts.--Project for navigation, 
        East Basin, Cape Cod Canal, Sandwich, Massachusetts.
            (6) Lynn harbor, massachusetts.--Project for navigation, 
        Lynn Harbor, Lynn, Massachusetts.
            (7) Merrimack river, massachusetts.--Project for 
        navigation, Merrimack River, Haverhill, Massachusetts.
            (8) Oak bluffs harbor, massachusetts.--Project for 
        navigation, Oak Bluffs Harbor, Oak Bluffs, Massachusetts.
            (9) Woods hole great harbor, massachusetts.--Project for 
        navigation, Woods Hole Great Harbor, Falmouth, Massachusetts.
            (10) Au sable river, michigan.--Project for navigation, Au 
        Sable River in the vicinity of Oscoda, Michigan.
            (11) Clinton river, michigan.--Project for navigation, 
        Clinton River, Michigan.
            (12) Ontonagon river, michigan.--Project for navigation, 
        Ontonagon River, Ontonagon, Michigan.
            (13) Traverse city, michigan.--Project for navigation, 
        Traverse City, Michigan.
            (14) Sebewaing river, michigan.--Project for navigation, 
        Sebewaing River, Michigan.
            (15) Tower harbor, minnesota.--Project for navigation, 
        Tower Harbor, Tower, Minnesota.
            (16) Outer channel and inner harbor, menominee harbor, 
        michigan and wisconsin.--Project for navigation, Outer Channel 
        and Inner Harbor, Menominee Harbor, Michigan and Wisconsin.
            (17) Middle bass island state park, middle bass island, 
        ohio.--Project for navigation, Middle Bass Island State Park, 
        Middle Bass Island, Ohio.
            (18) Milwaukee harbor, wisconsin.--Project for navigation, 
        Milwaukee Harbor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

SEC. 1006. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
appropriate, may carry out the project under section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330):
            (1) Black lake, alaska.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Black Lake, Alaska, at the head of the Chignik 
        Watershed.
            (2) San diego river, california.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, San Diego River, California, including 
        efforts to address invasive aquatic plant species.
            (3) Suison marsh, san pablo bay, california.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, San Pablo Bay, California.
            (4) Chattahoochee fall-line, georgia.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Chattahoochee Fall-Line, Georgia.
            (5) Lawrence gateway, massachusetts.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration at the Lawrence Gateway quadrant project 
        along the Merrimack and Spicket Rivers in Lawrence, 
        Massachusetts, in accordance with the general conditions 
        established by the project approval of the Environmental 
        Protection Agency, Region I, including filling abandoned 
        drainage facilities and making improvements to the drainage 
        system on the Lawrence Gateway to prevent continued migration 
        of contaminated sediments into the river systems.
            (6) Mill pond, littleton, massachusetts.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Mill Pond, Littleton, 
        Massachusetts.
            (7) Milford pond, milford, massachusetts.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Milford Pond, Milford, 
        Massachusetts.
            (8) Pine tree brook, milton, massachusetts.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Pine Tree Brook, Milton, 
        Massachusetts.
            (9) Clinton river, michigan.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Clinton River, Michigan.
            (10) Caldwell county, north carolina.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Caldwell County, North Carolina.
            (11) Mecklenberg county, north carolina.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Mecklenberg County, North 
        Carolina.
            (12) Johnson creek, gresham, oregon.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Johnson Creek, Gresham, Oregon.
            (13) Blackstone river, rhode island.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Blackstone River, Rhode Island.
            (14) College lake, lynchburg, virginia.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, College Lake, Lynchburg, 
        Virginia.

SEC. 1007. SMALL PROJECTS TO PREVENT OR MITIGATE DAMAGE CAUSED BY 
              NAVIGATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 111 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i):
            (1) Tybee Island, Georgia.
            (2) Burns Waterway Harbor, Indiana.

SEC. 1008. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL.

    The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project for aquatic 
nuisance plant control in the Republican River Basin, Nebraska, under 
section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610).

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

                         Subtitle A--Provisions

SEC. 2001. CREDIT FOR IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS.

    Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``sec. 221'' and inserting the following:

``SEC. 221. WRITTEN AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES 
              PROJECTS.'';

            and
            (2) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:
    ``(a) Cooperation of Non-Federal Interest.--
            ``(1) In general.--After December 31, 1970, the 
        construction of any water resources project, or an acceptable 
        separable element thereof, by the Secretary of the Army, acting 
        through the Chief of Engineers, or by a non-Federal interest 
        where such interest will be reimbursed for such construction 
        under any provision of law, shall not be commenced until each 
        non-Federal interest has entered into a written partnership 
        agreement with the district engineer for the district in which 
        the project will be carried out under which each party agrees 
        to carry out its responsibilities and requirements for 
        implementation or construction of the project or the 
        appropriate element of the project, as the case may be; except 
        that no such agreement shall be required if the Secretary 
        determines that the administrative costs associated with 
        negotiating, executing, or administering the agreement would 
        exceed the amount of the contribution required from the non-
        Federal interest and are less than $25,000.
            ``(2) Liquidated damages.--An agreement described in 
        paragraph (1) may include a provision for liquidated damages in 
        the event of a failure of 1 or more parties to perform.
            ``(3) Obligation of future appropriations.--In any such 
        agreement entered into by a State, or a body politic of the 
        State which derives its powers from the State constitution, or 
        a governmental entity created by the State legislature, the 
        agreement may reflect that it does not obligate future 
        appropriations for such performance and payment when obligating 
        future appropriations would be inconsistent with constitutional 
        or statutory limitations of the State or a political 
        subdivision of the State.
            ``(4) Credit for in-kind contributions.--
                    ``(A) In general.--An agreement under paragraph (1) 
                shall provide that the Secretary shall credit toward 
                the non-Federal share of the cost of the project, 
                including a project implemented under general 
                continuing authority, the value of in-kind 
                contributions made by the non-Federal interest, 
                including--
                            ``(i) the costs of planning (including data 
                        collection), design, management, mitigation, 
                        construction, and construction services that 
                        are provided by the non-Federal interest for 
                        implementation of the project;
                            ``(ii) the value of materials or services 
                        provided before execution of an agreement for 
                        the project, including efforts on constructed 
                        elements incorporated into the project; and
                            ``(iii) materials and services provided 
                        after an agreement is executed.
                    ``(B) Condition.--The Secretary shall credit an in-
                kind contribution under subparagraph (A) if the 
                Secretary determines that the property or service 
                provided as an in-kind contribution is integral to the 
                project.
                    ``(C) Limitations.--Credit authorized for a 
                project--
                            ``(i) shall not exceed the non-Federal 
                        share of the cost of the project;
                            ``(ii) shall not alter any other 
                        requirement that a non-Federal interest provide 
                        land, an easement or right-of-way, or an area 
                        for disposal of dredged material for the 
                        project; and
                            ``(iii) shall not exceed the actual and 
                        reasonable costs of the materials, services, or 
                        other things provided by the non-Federal 
                        interest, as determined by the Secretary.''.

SEC. 2002. INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT AUTHORITY.

    Section 234 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2323a) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:
    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary may engage in activities 
(including contracting) in support of other Federal agencies, 
international organizations, or foreign governments to address problems 
of national significance to the United States.'';
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``Secretary of State'' 
        and inserting ``Department of State''; and
            (3) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) by striking ``$250,000 for fiscal year 2001'' 
                and inserting ``$1,000,000 for fiscal year 2007 and 
                each fiscal year thereafter''; and
                    (B) by striking ``or international organizations'' 
                and inserting ``, international organizations, or 
                foreign governments''.

SEC. 2003. TRAINING FUNDS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may include individuals from the 
non-Federal interest, including the private sector, in training classes 
and courses offered by the Corps of Engineers in any case in which the 
Secretary determines that it is in the best interest of the Federal 
Government to include those individuals as participants.
    (b) Expenses.--
            (1) In general.--An individual from a non-Federal interest 
        attending a training class or course described in subsection 
        (a) shall pay the full cost of the training provided to the 
        individual.
            (2) Payments.--Payments made by an individual for training 
        received under subsection (a), up to the actual cost of the 
        training--
                    (A) may be retained by the Secretary;
                    (B) shall be credited to an appropriation or 
                account used for paying training costs; and
                    (C) shall be available for use by the Secretary, 
                without further appropriation, for training purposes.
            (3) Excess amounts.--Any payments received under paragraph 
        (2) that are in excess of the actual cost of training provided 
        shall be credited as miscellaneous receipts to the Treasury of 
        the United States.

SEC. 2004. FISCAL TRANSPARENCY REPORT.

    (a) In General.--On the third Tuesday of January of each year 
beginning January 2008, the Chief of Engineers shall submit to the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives a report on the expenditures for the preceding fiscal 
year and estimated expenditures for the current fiscal year.
    (b) Contents.--In addition to the information described in 
subsection (a), the report shall contain a detailed accounting of the 
following information:
            (1) With respect to general construction, information on--
                    (A) projects currently under construction, 
                including--
                            (i) allocations to date;
                            (ii) the number of years remaining to 
                        complete construction;
                            (iii) the estimated annual Federal cost to 
                        maintain that construction schedule; and
                            (iv) a list of projects the Corps of 
                        Engineers expects to complete during the 
                        current fiscal year; and
                    (B) projects for which there is a signed cost-
                sharing agreement and completed planning, engineering, 
                and design, including--
                            (i) the number of years the project is 
                        expected to require for completion; and
                            (ii) estimated annual Federal cost to 
                        maintain that construction schedule.
            (2) With respect to operation and maintenance of the inland 
        and intracoastal waterways under section 206 of Public Law 95-
        502 (33 U.S.C. 1804)--
                    (A) the estimated annual cost to maintain each 
                waterway for the authorized reach and at the authorized 
                depth; and
                    (B) the estimated annual cost of operation and 
                maintenance of locks and dams to ensure navigation 
                without interruption.
            (3) With respect to general investigations and 
        reconnaissance and feasibility studies--
                    (A) the number of active studies;
                    (B) the number of completed studies not yet 
                authorized for construction;
                    (C) the number of initiated studies; and
                    (D) the number of studies expected to be completed 
                during the fiscal year.
            (4) Funding received and estimates of funds to be received 
        for interagency and international support activities under 
        section 318(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
        (33 U.S.C. 2323(a)).
            (5) Recreation fees and lease payments.
            (6) Hydropower and water storage fees.
            (7) Deposits into the Inland Waterway Trust Fund and the 
        Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund.
            (8) Other revenues and fees collected.
            (9) With respect to permit applications and notifications, 
        a list of individual permit applications and nationwide permit 
        notifications, including--
                    (A) the date on which each permit application is 
                filed;
                    (B) the date on which each permit application is 
                determined to be complete; and
                    (C) the date on which the Corps of Engineers 
                grants, withdraws, or denies each permit.
            (10) With respect to the project backlog, a list of 
        authorized projects for which no funds have been allocated for 
        the 5 preceding fiscal years, including, for each project--
                    (A) the authorization date;
                    (B) the last allocation date;
                    (C) the percentage of construction completed;
                    (D) the estimated cost remaining until completion 
                of the project; and
                    (E) a brief explanation of the reasons for the 
                delay.

SEC. 2005. PLANNING.

    (a) Matters to Be Addressed in Planning.--Section 904 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2281) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Enhancing'' and inserting the following:
    ``(a) In General.--Enhancing''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Assessments.--For all feasibility reports completed after 
December 31, 2005, the Secretary shall assess whether--
            ``(1) the water resource project and each separable element 
        is cost-effective; and
            ``(2) the water resource project complies with Federal, 
        State, and local laws (including regulations) and public 
        policies.''.
    (b) Planning Process Improvements.--The Chief of Engineers--
            (1) shall, not later than 2 years after the date on which 
        the feasibility study cost sharing agreement is signed for a 
        project, subject to the availability of appropriations--
                    (A) complete the feasibility study for the project; 
                and
                    (B) sign the report of the Chief of Engineers for 
                the project;
            (2) may, with the approval of the Secretary, extend the 
        deadline established under paragraph (1) for not to exceed 4 
        years, for a complex or controversial study; and
            (3)(A) shall adopt a risk analysis approach to project cost 
        estimates; and
            (B) not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
        this Act, shall--
                    (i) issue procedures for risk analysis for cost 
                estimation; and
                    (ii) submit to Congress a report that includes 
                suggested amendments to section 902 of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280).
    (c) Calculation of Benefits and Costs for Flood Damage Reduction 
Projects.--A feasibility study for a project for flood damage reduction 
shall include, as part of the calculation of benefits and costs--
            (1) a calculation of the residual risk of flooding 
        following completion of the proposed project;
            (2) a calculation of the residual risk of loss of human 
        life and residual risk to human safety following completion of 
        the proposed project; and
            (3) a calculation of any upstream or downstream impacts of 
        the proposed project.
    (d) Centers of Specialized Planning Expertise.--
            (1) Establishment.--The Secretary may establish centers of 
        expertise to provide specialized planning expertise for water 
        resource projects to be carried out by the Secretary in order 
        to enhance and supplement the capabilities of the districts of 
        the Corps of Engineers.
            (2) Duties.--A center of expertise established under this 
        subsection shall--
                    (A) provide technical and managerial assistance to 
                district commanders of the Corps of Engineers for 
                project planning, development, and implementation;
                    (B) provide peer reviews of new major scientific, 
                engineering, or economic methods, models, or analyses 
                that will be used to support decisions of the Secretary 
                with respect to feasibility studies;
                    (C) provide support for external peer review panels 
                convened by the Secretary; and
                    (D) carry out such other duties as are prescribed 
                by the Secretary.
    (e) Completion of Corps of Engineers Reports.--
            (1) Alternatives.--
                    (A) In general.--Feasibility and other studies and 
                assessments of water resource problems and projects 
                shall include recommendations for alternatives--
                            (i) that, as determined by the non-Federal 
                        interests for the projects, promote integrated 
                        water resources management; and
                            (ii) for which the non-Federal interests 
                        are willing to provide the non-Federal share 
                        for the studies or assessments.
                    (B) Scope and purposes.--The scope and purposes of 
                studies and assessments described in subparagraph (A) 
                shall not be constrained by budgetary or other policy 
                as a result of the inclusion of alternatives described 
                in that subparagraph.
                    (C) Reports of chief of engineers.--The reports of 
                the Chief of Engineers shall be based solely on the 
                best technical solutions to water resource needs and 
                problems.
            (2) Report completion.--The completion of a report of the 
        Chief of Engineers for a project--
                    (A) shall not be delayed while consideration is 
                being given to potential changes in policy or priority 
                for project consideration; and
                    (B) shall be submitted, on completion, to--
                            (i) the Committee on Environment and Public 
                        Works of the Senate; and
                            (ii) the Committee on Transportation and 
                        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
    (f) Completion Review.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), not 
        later than 90 days after the date of completion of a report of 
        the Chief of Engineers that recommends to Congress a water 
        resource project, the Secretary shall--
                    (A) review the report; and
                    (B) provide any recommendations of the Secretary 
                regarding the water resource project to Congress.
            (2) Prior reports.--Not later than 90 days after the date 
        of enactment of this Act, with respect to any report of the 
        Chief of Engineers recommending a water resource project that 
        is complete prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the 
        Secretary shall complete review of, and provide recommendations 
        to Congress for, the report in accordance with paragraph (1).

SEC. 2006. WATER RESOURCES PLANNING COORDINATING COMMITTEE.

    (a) Establishment.--The President shall establish a Water Resources 
Planning Coordinating Committee (referred to in this subsection as the 
``Coordinating Committee'').
    (b) Membership.--
            (1) In general.--The Coordinating Committee shall be 
        composed of the following members (or a designee of the 
        member):
                    (A) The Secretary of the Interior.
                    (B) The Secretary of Agriculture.
                    (C) The Secretary of Health and Human Services.
                    (D) The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.
                    (E) The Secretary of Transportation.
                    (F) The Secretary of Energy.
                    (G) The Secretary of Homeland Security.
                    (H) The Secretary of Commerce.
                    (I) The Administrator of the Environmental 
                Protection Agency.
                    (J) The Chairperson of the Council on Environmental 
                Quality.
            (2) Chairperson and executive director.--The President 
        shall appoint--
                    (A) 1 member of the Coordinating Committee to serve 
                as Chairperson of the Coordinating Committee for a term 
                of 2 years; and
                    (B) an Executive Director to supervise the 
                activities of the Coordinating Committee.
            (3) Function.--The function of the Coordinating Committee 
        shall be to carry out the duties and responsibilities set forth 
        under this section.
    (c) National Water Resources Planning and Modernization Policy.--It 
is the policy of the United States that all water resources projects 
carried out by the Corps of Engineers shall--
            (1) reflect national priorities;
            (2) seek to avoid the unwise use of floodplains;
            (3) minimize vulnerabilities in any case in which a 
        floodplain must be used;
            (4) protect and restore the functions of natural systems; 
        and
            (5) mitigate any unavoidable damage to natural systems.
    (d) Water Resource Priorities Report.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Coordinating Committee, in 
        collaboration with the Secretary, shall submit to the President 
        and Congress a report describing the vulnerability of the 
        United States to damage from flooding and related storm damage, 
        including--
                    (A) the risk to human life;
                    (B) the risk to property; and
                    (C) the comparative risks faced by different 
                regions of the United States.
            (2) Inclusions.--The report under paragraph (1) shall 
        include--
                    (A) an assessment of the extent to which programs 
                in the United States relating to flooding address flood 
                risk reduction priorities;
                    (B) the extent to which those programs may be 
                unintentionally encouraging development and economic 
                activity in floodprone areas;
                    (C) recommendations for improving those programs 
                with respect to reducing and responding to flood risks; 
                and
                    (D) proposals for implementing the recommendations.
    (e) Modernizing Water Resources Planning Guidelines.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, and every 5 years thereafter, the 
        Secretary and the Coordinating Committee shall, in 
        collaboration with each other, review and propose updates and 
        revisions to modernize the planning principles and guidelines, 
        regulations, and circulars by which the Corps of Engineers 
        analyzes and evaluates water projects. In carrying out the 
        review, the Coordinating Committee and the Secretary shall 
        consult with the National Academy of Sciences for 
        recommendations regarding updating planning documents.
            (2) Proposed revisions.--In conducting a review under 
        paragraph (1), the Coordinating Committee and the Secretary 
        shall consider revisions to improve water resources project 
        planning through, among other things--
                    (A) requiring the use of modern economic principles 
                and analytical techniques, credible schedules for 
                project construction, and current discount rates as 
                used by other Federal agencies;
                    (B) eliminating biases and disincentives to 
                providing projects to low-income communities, including 
                fully accounting for the prevention of loss of life 
                under section 904 of the Water Resources Development 
                Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2281);
                    (C) eliminating biases and disincentives that 
                discourage the use of nonstructural approaches to water 
                resources development and management, and fully 
                accounting for the flood protection and other values of 
                healthy natural systems;
                    (D) promoting environmental restoration projects 
                that reestablish natural processes;
                    (E) assessing and evaluating the impacts of a 
                project in the context of other projects within a 
                region or watershed;
                    (F) analyzing and incorporating lessons learned 
                from recent studies of Corps of Engineers programs and 
                recent disasters such as Hurricane Katrina and the 
                Great Midwest Flood of 1993;
                    (G) encouraging wetlands conservation; and
                    (H) ensuring the effective implementation of the 
                policies of this Act.
            (3) Public participation.--The Coordinating Committee and 
        the Secretary shall solicit public and expert comments 
        regarding any revision proposed under paragraph (2).
            (4) Revision of planning guidance.--
                    (A) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the 
                date on which a review under paragraph (1) is 
                completed, the Secretary, after providing notice and an 
                opportunity for public comment in accordance with 
                subchapter II of chapter 5, and chapter 7, of title 5, 
                United States Code (commonly known as the 
                ``Administrative Procedure Act''), shall implement such 
                proposed updates and revisions to the planning 
                principles and guidelines, regulations, and circulars 
                of the Corps of Engineers under paragraph (2) as the 
                Secretary determines to be appropriate.
                    (B) Effect.--Effective beginning on the date on 
                which the Secretary implements the first update or 
                revision under paragraph (1), subsections (a) and (b) 
                of section 80 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-17) shall not apply to the Corps 
                of Engineers.
            (5) Report.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall submit to the 
                Committees on Environment and Public Works and 
                Appropriations of the Senate, and to the Committees on 
                Transportation and Infrastructure and Appropriations of 
                the House of Representatives, a report describing any 
                revision of planning guidance under paragraph (4).
                    (B) Publication.--The Secretary shall publish the 
                report under subparagraph (A) in the Federal Register.

SEC. 2007. INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Construction activities.--The term ``construction 
        activities'' means development of detailed engineering and 
        design specifications during the preconstruction engineering 
        and design phase and the engineering and design phase of a 
        water resources project carried out by the Corps of Engineers, 
        and other activities carried out on a water resources project 
        prior to completion of the construction and to turning the 
        project over to the local cost-share partner.
            (2) Project study.--The term ``project study'' means a 
        feasibility report, reevaluation report, or environmental 
        impact statement prepared by the Corps of Engineers.
    (b) Director of Independent Review.--The Secretary shall appoint in 
the Office of the Secretary a Director of Independent Review. The 
Director shall be selected from among individuals who are distinguished 
experts in engineering, hydrology, biology, economics, or another 
discipline related to water resources management. The Secretary shall 
ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that the Director does not 
have a financial, professional, or other conflict of interest with 
projects subject to review. The Director of Independent Review shall 
carry out the duties set forth in this section and such other duties as 
the Secretary deems appropriate.
    (c) Sound Project Planning.--
            (1) Projects subject to planning review.--The Secretary 
        shall ensure that each project study for a water resources 
        project shall be reviewed by an independent panel of experts 
        established under this subsection if--
                    (A) the project has an estimated total cost of more 
                than $40,000,000, including mitigation costs;
                    (B) the Governor of a State in which the water 
                resources project is located in whole or in part, or 
                the Governor of a State within the drainage basin in 
                which a water resources project is located and that 
                would be directly affected economically or 
                environmentally as a result of the project, requests in 
                writing to the Secretary the establishment of an 
                independent panel of experts for the project;
                    (C) the head of a Federal agency with authority to 
                review the project determines that the project is 
                likely to have a significant adverse impact on public 
                safety, or on environmental, fish and wildlife, 
                historical, cultural, or other resources under the 
                jurisdiction of the agency, and requests in writing to 
                the Secretary the establishment of an independent panel 
                of experts for the project; or
                    (D) the Secretary determines on his or her own 
                initiative, or shall determine within 30 days of 
                receipt of a written request for a controversy 
                determination by any party, that the project is 
                controversial because--
                            (i) there is a significant dispute 
                        regarding the size, nature, potential safety 
                        risks, or effects of the project; or
                            (ii) there is a significant dispute 
                        regarding the economic, or environmental costs 
                        or benefits of the project.
            (2) Project planning review panels.--
                    (A) Project planning review panel membership.--For 
                each water resources project subject to review under 
                this subsection, the Director of Independent Review 
                shall establish a panel of independent experts that 
                shall be composed of not less than 5 nor more than 9 
                independent experts (including at least 1 engineer, 1 
                hydrologist, 1 biologist, and 1 economist) who 
                represent a range of areas of expertise. The Director 
                of Independent Review shall apply the National Academy 
                of Science's policy for selecting committee members to 
                ensure that members have no conflict with the project 
                being reviewed, and shall consult with the National 
                Academy of Sciences in developing lists of individuals 
                to serve on panels of experts under this subsection. An 
                individual serving on a panel under this subsection 
                shall be compensated at a rate of pay to be determined 
                by the Secretary, and shall be allowed travel expenses.
                    (B) Duties of project planning review panels.--An 
                independent panel of experts established under this 
                subsection shall review the project study, receive from 
                the public written and oral comments concerning the 
                project study, and submit a written report to the 
                Secretary that shall contain the panel's conclusions 
                and recommendations regarding project study issues 
                identified as significant by the panel, including 
                issues such as--
                            (i) economic and environmental assumptions 
                        and projections;
                            (ii) project evaluation data;
                            (iii) economic or environmental analyses;
                            (iv) engineering analyses;
                            (v) formulation of alternative plans;
                            (vi) methods for integrating risk and 
                        uncertainty;
                            (vii) models used in evaluation of economic 
                        or environmental impacts of proposed projects; 
                        and
                            (viii) any related biological opinions.
                    (C) Project planning review record.--
                            (i) In general.--After receiving a report 
                        from an independent panel of experts 
                        established under this subsection, the 
                        Secretary shall take into consideration any 
                        recommendations contained in the report and 
                        shall immediately make the report available to 
                        the public on the internet.
                            (ii) Recommendations.--The Secretary shall 
                        prepare a written explanation of any 
                        recommendations of the independent panel of 
                        experts established under this subsection not 
                        adopted by the Secretary. Recommendations and 
                        findings of the independent panel of experts 
                        rejected without good cause shown, as 
                        determined by judicial review, shall be given 
                        equal deference as the recommendations and 
                        findings of the Secretary during a judicial 
                        proceeding relating to the water resources 
                        project.
                            (iii) Submission to congress and public 
                        availability.--The report of the independent 
                        panel of experts established under this 
                        subsection and the written explanation of the 
                        Secretary required by clause (ii) shall be 
                        included with the report of the Chief of 
                        Engineers to Congress, shall be published in 
                        the Federal Register, and shall be made 
                        available to the public on the Internet.
                    (D) Deadlines for project planning reviews.--
                            (i) In general.--Independent review of a 
                        project study shall be completed prior to the 
                        completion of any Chief of Engineers report for 
                        a specific water resources project.
                            (ii) Deadline for project planning review 
                        panel studies.--An independent panel of experts 
                        established under this subsection shall 
                        complete its review of the project study and 
                        submit to the Secretary a report not later than 
                        180 days after the date of establishment of the 
                        panel, or not later than 90 days after the 
                        close of the public comment period on a draft 
                        project study that includes a preferred 
                        alternative, whichever is later. The Secretary 
                        may extend these deadlines for good cause.
                            (iii) Failure to complete review and 
                        report.--If an independent panel of experts 
                        established under this subsection does not 
                        submit to the Secretary a report by the 
                        deadline established by clause (ii), the Chief 
                        of Engineers may continue project planning 
                        without delay.
                            (iv) Duration of panels.--An independent 
                        panel of experts established under this 
                        subsection shall terminate on the date of 
                        submission of the report by the panel. Panels 
                        may be established as early in the planning 
                        process as deemed appropriate by the Director 
                        of Independent Review, but shall be appointed 
                        no later than 90 days before the release for 
                        public comment of a draft study subject to 
                        review under subsection (c)(1)(A), and not 
                        later than 30 days after a determination that 
                        review is necessary under subsection (c)(1)(B), 
                        (c)(1)(C), or (c)(1)(D).
                    (E) Effect on existing guidance.--The project 
                planning review required by this subsection shall be 
                deemed to satisfy any external review required by 
                Engineering Circular 1105-2-408 (31 May 2005) on Peer 
                Review of Decision Documents.
    (d) Safety Assurance.--
            (1) Projects subject to safety assurance review.--The 
        Secretary shall ensure that the construction activities for any 
        flood damage reduction project shall be reviewed by an 
        independent panel of experts established under this subsection 
        if the Director of Independent Review makes a determination 
        that an independent review is necessary to ensure public 
        health, safety, and welfare on any project--
                    (A) for which the reliability of performance under 
                emergency conditions is critical;
                    (B) that uses innovative materials or techniques;
                    (C) for which the project design is lacking in 
                redundancy, or that has a unique construction 
                sequencing or a short or overlapping design 
                construction schedule; or
                    (D) other than a project described in subparagraphs 
                (A) through (C), as the Director of Independent Review 
                determines to be appropriate.
            (2) Safety assurance review panels.--At the appropriate 
        point in the development of detailed engineering and design 
        specifications for each water resources project subject to 
        review under this subsection, the Director of Independent 
        Review shall establish an independent panel of experts to 
        review and report to the Secretary on the adequacy of 
        construction activities for the project. An independent panel 
        of experts under this subsection shall be composed of not less 
        than 5 nor more than 9 independent experts selected from among 
        individuals who are distinguished experts in engineering, 
        hydrology, or other pertinent disciplines. The Director of 
        Independent Review shall apply the National Academy of 
        Science's policy for selecting committee members to ensure that 
        panel members have no conflict with the project being reviewed. 
        An individual serving on a panel of experts under this 
        subsection shall be compensated at a rate of pay to be 
        determined by the Secretary, and shall be allowed travel 
        expenses.
            (3) Deadlines for safety assurance reviews.--An independent 
        panel of experts established under this subsection shall submit 
        a written report to the Secretary on the adequacy of the 
        construction activities prior to the initiation of physical 
        construction and periodically thereafter until construction 
        activities are completed on a publicly available schedule 
        determined by the Director of Independent Review for the 
        purposes of assuring the public safety. The Director of 
        Independent Review shall ensure that these reviews be carried 
        out in a way to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, 
        while not causing unnecessary delays in construction 
        activities.
            (4) Safety assurance review record.--After receiving a 
        written report from an independent panel of experts established 
        under this subsection, the Secretary shall--
                    (A) take into consideration recommendations 
                contained in the report, provide a written explanation 
                of recommendations not adopted, and immediately make 
                the report and explanation available to the public on 
                the Internet; and
                    (B) submit the report to the Committee on 
                Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
                Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
                House of Representatives.
    (e) Expenses.--
            (1) In general.--The costs of an independent panel of 
        experts established under subsection (c) or (d) shall be a 
        Federal expense and shall not exceed--
                    (A) $250,000, if the total cost of the project in 
                current year dollars is less than $50,000,000; and
                    (B) 0.5 percent of the total cost of the project in 
                current year dollars, if the total cost is $50,000,000 
                or more.
            (2) Waiver.--The Secretary, at the written request of the 
        Director of Independent Review, may waive the cost limitations 
        under paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines appropriate.
    (f) Report.--Not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report describing 
the implementation of this section.
    (g) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
affect any authority of the Secretary to cause or conduct a peer review 
of the engineering, scientific, or technical basis of any water 
resources project in existence on the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2008. MITIGATION FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE LOSSES.

    (a) Completion of Mitigation.--Section 906(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(a)) is amended by 
adding at the following:
            ``(3) Completion of mitigation.--In any case in which it is 
        not technically practicable to complete mitigation by the last 
        day of construction of the project or separable element of the 
        project because of the nature of the mitigation to be 
        undertaken, the Secretary shall complete the required 
        mitigation as expeditiously as practicable, but in no case 
        later than the last day of the first fiscal year beginning 
        after the last day of construction of the project or separable 
        element of the project.''.
    (b) Use of Consolidated Mitigation.--Section 906(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(b)) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Use of consolidated mitigation.--
                    ``(A) In general.--If the Secretary determines that 
                other forms of compensatory mitigation are not 
                practicable or are less environmentally desirable, the 
                Secretary may purchase available credits from a 
                mitigation bank or conservation bank that is approved 
                in accordance with the Federal Guidance for the 
                Establishment, Use and Operation of Mitigations Banks 
                (60 Fed. Reg. 58605) or other applicable Federal laws 
                (including regulations).
                    ``(B) Service area.--To the maximum extent 
                practicable, the service area of the mitigation bank or 
                conservation bank shall be in the same watershed as the 
                affected habitat.
                    ``(C) Responsibility relieved.--Purchase of credits 
                from a mitigation bank or conservation bank for a water 
                resources project relieves the Secretary and the non-
                Federal interest from responsibility for monitoring or 
                demonstrating mitigation success.''.
    (c) Mitigation Requirements.--Section 906(d) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(d)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in the first sentence, by striking ``to the 
                Congress unless such report contains'' and inserting 
                ``to Congress, and shall not select a project 
                alternative in any final record of decision, 
                environmental impact statement, or environmental 
                assessment, unless the proposal, record of decision, 
                environmental impact statement, or environmental 
                assessment contains''; and
                    (B) in the second sentence, by inserting ``, and 
                other habitat types are mitigated to not less than in-
                kind conditions'' after ``mitigated in-kind''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Mitigation requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--To mitigate losses to flood 
                damage reduction capabilities and fish and wildlife 
                resulting from a water resources project, the Secretary 
                shall ensure that the mitigation plan for each water 
                resources project complies fully with the mitigation 
                standards and policies established pursuant to section 
                404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
                U.S.C. 1344).
                    ``(B) Inclusions.--A specific mitigation plan for a 
                water resources project under paragraph (1) shall 
                include, at a minimum--
                            ``(i) a plan for monitoring the 
                        implementation and ecological success of each 
                        mitigation measure, including a designation of 
                        the entities that will be responsible for the 
                        monitoring;
                            ``(ii) the criteria for ecological success 
                        by which the mitigation will be evaluated and 
                        determined to be successful;
                            ``(iii) land and interests in land to be 
                        acquired for the mitigation plan and the basis 
                        for a determination that the land and interests 
                        are available for acquisition;
                            ``(iv) a description of--
                                    ``(I) the types and amount of 
                                restoration activities to be conducted; 
                                and
                                    ``(II) the resource functions and 
                                values that will result from the 
                                mitigation plan; and
                            ``(v) a contingency plan for taking 
                        corrective actions in cases in which monitoring 
                        demonstrates that mitigation measures are not 
                        achieving ecological success in accordance with 
                        criteria under clause (ii).
            ``(4) Determination of success.--
                    ``(A) In general.--A mitigation plan under this 
                subsection shall be considered to be successful at the 
                time at which the criteria under paragraph (3)(B)(ii) 
                are achieved under the plan, as determined by 
                monitoring under paragraph (3)(B)(i).
                    ``(B) Consultation.--In determining whether a 
                mitigation plan is successful under subparagraph (A), 
                the Secretary shall consult annually with appropriate 
                Federal agencies and each State in which the applicable 
                project is located on at least the following:
                            ``(i) The ecological success of the 
                        mitigation as of the date on which the report 
                        is submitted.
                            ``(ii) The likelihood that the mitigation 
                        will achieve ecological success, as defined in 
                        the mitigation plan.
                            ``(iii) The projected timeline for 
                        achieving that success.
                            ``(iv) Any recommendations for improving 
                        the likelihood of success.
                    ``(C) Reporting.--Not later than 60 days after the 
                date of completion of the annual consultation, the 
                Federal agencies consulted shall, and each State in 
                which the project is located may, submit to the 
                Secretary a report that describes the results of the 
                consultation described in (B).
                    ``(D) Action by secretary.--The Secretary shall 
                respond in writing to the substance and recommendations 
                contained in each report under subparagraph (C) by not 
                later than 30 days after the date of receipt of the 
                report.
            ``(5) Monitoring.--Mitigation monitoring shall continue 
        until it has been demonstrated that the mitigation has met the 
        ecological success criteria.''.
    (d) Status Report.--
            (1) In general.--Concurrent with the submission of the 
        President to Congress of the request of the President for 
        appropriations for the Civil Works Program for a fiscal year, 
        the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on the Environment 
        and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives a report describing the status of construction 
        of projects that require mitigation under section 906 of Water 
        Resources Development Act 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283) and the status 
        of that mitigation.
            (2) Projects included.--The status report shall include the 
        status of--
                    (A) all projects that are under construction as of 
                the date of the report;
                    (B) all projects for which the President requests 
                funding for the next fiscal year; and
                    (C) all projects that have completed construction, 
                but have not completed the mitigation required under 
                section 906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283).
    (e) Mitigation Tracking System.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish a 
        recordkeeping system to track, for each water resources project 
        undertaken by the Secretary and for each permit issued under 
        section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
        U.S.C. 1344)--
                    (A) the quantity and type of wetland and any other 
                habitat type affected by the project, project 
                operation, or permitted activity;
                    (B) the quantity and type of mitigation measures 
                required with respect to the project, project 
                operation, or permitted activity;
                    (C) the quantity and type of mitigation measures 
                that have been completed with respect to the project, 
                project operation, or permitted activity; and
                    (D) the status of monitoring of the mitigation 
                measures carried out with respect to the project, 
                project operation, or permitted activity.
            (2) Requirements.--The recordkeeping system under paragraph 
        (1) shall--
                    (A) include information relating to the impacts and 
                mitigation measures relating to projects described in 
                paragraph (1) that occur after November 17, 1986; and
                    (B) be organized by watershed, project, permit 
                application, and zip code.
            (3) Availability of information.--The Secretary shall make 
        information contained in the recordkeeping system available to 
        the public on the Internet.

SEC. 2009. STATE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.

    Section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-16) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``sec. 22. (a) The Secretary'' and 
        inserting the following:

``SEC. 22. PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES.

    ``(a) Federal-State Cooperation.--
            ``(1) Comprehensive plans.--The Secretary'';
            (2) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Technical assistance.--
                    ``(A) In general.--At the request of a governmental 
                agency or non-Federal interest, the Secretary may 
                provide, at Federal expense, technical assistance to 
                the agency or non-Federal interest in managing water 
                resources.
                    ``(B) Types of assistance.--Technical assistance 
                under this paragraph may include provision and 
                integration of hydrologic, economic, and environmental 
                data and analyses.'';
            (3) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``this section'' each 
        place it appears and inserting ``subsection (a)(1)'';
            (4) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ``up to \1/2\ of 
        the'' and inserting ``the'';
            (5) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by striking ``(c) There is'' and inserting the 
                following:
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            ``(1) Federal and state cooperation.--There is'';
                    (B) in paragraph (1) (as designated by subparagraph 
                (A)), by striking ``the provisions of this section 
                except that not more than $500,000 shall be expended in 
                any one year in any one State.'' and inserting 
                ``subsection (a)(1).''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Technical assistance.--There is authorized to be 
        appropriated to carry out subsection (a)(2) $5,000,000 for each 
        fiscal year, of which not more than $2,000,000 for each fiscal 
        year may be used by the Secretary to enter into cooperative 
        agreements with nonprofit organizations and State agencies to 
        provide assistance to rural and small communities.''; and
            (6) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Annual Submission.--For each fiscal year, based on 
performance criteria developed by the Secretary, the Secretary shall 
list in the annual civil works budget submitted to Congress the 
individual activities proposed for funding under subsection (a)(1) for 
the fiscal year.''.

SEC. 2010. ACCESS TO WATER RESOURCE DATA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, acting through the Chief of 
Engineers, shall carry out a program to provide public access to water 
resource and related water quality data in the custody of the Corps of 
Engineers.
    (b) Data.--Public access under subsection (a) shall--
            (1) include, at a minimum, access to data generated in 
        water resource project development and regulation under section 
        404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 
        1344); and
            (2) appropriately employ geographic information system 
        technology and linkages to water resource models and analytical 
        techniques.
    (c) Partnerships.--To the maximum extent practicable, in carrying 
out activities under this section, the Secretary shall develop 
partnerships, including cooperative agreements with State, tribal, and 
local governments and other Federal agencies.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,000,000 for each fiscal year.

SEC. 2011. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
              INTERESTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 211(e)(6) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13(e)(6)) is amended by adding 
at the end following:
                    ``(E) Budget priority.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Budget priority for 
                        projects under this section shall be 
                        proportionate to the percentage of project 
                        completion.
                            ``(ii) Completed project.--A completed 
                        project shall have the same priority as a 
                        project with a contractor on site.''.
    (b) Construction of Flood Control Projects by Non-Federal 
Interests.--Section 211(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) Thornton reservoir, cook county, illinois.--An 
        element of the project for flood control, Chicagoland Underflow 
        Plan, Illinois.
            ``(10) Buffalo bayou, texas.--The project for flood 
        control, Buffalo Bayou, Texas, authorized by the first section 
        of the Act of June 20, 1938 (52 Stat. 804, chapter 535) 
        (commonly known as the `River and Harbor Act of 1938') and 
        modified by section 3a of the Act of August 11, 1939 (53 Stat. 
        1414, chapter 699) (commonly known as the `Flood Control Act of 
        1939'), except that, subject to the approval of the Secretary 
        as provided by this section, the non-Federal interest may 
        design and construct an alternative to such project.
            ``(11) Halls bayou, texas.--The Halls Bayou element of the 
        project for flood control, Buffalo Bayou and tributaries, 
        Texas, authorized by section 101(a)(21) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note), except that, 
        subject to the approval of the Secretary as provided by this 
        section, the non-Federal interest may design and construct an 
        alternative to such project.
            ``(12) Menomonee river watershed, wisconsin.--The project 
        for the Menomonee River Watershed, Wisconsin, including--
                    ``(A) the Underwood Creek diversion facility 
                project (Milwaukee County Grounds); and
                    ``(B) the Greater Milwaukee Rivers watershed 
                project.''.

SEC. 2012. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 204. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT.

    ``(a) In General.--In connection with sediment obtained through the 
construction, operation, or maintenance of an authorized Federal water 
resources project, the Secretary, acting through the Chief of 
Engineers, shall develop Regional Sediment Management plans and carry 
out projects at locations identified in the plan prepared under 
subsection (e), or identified jointly by the non-Federal interest and 
the Secretary, for use in the construction, repair, modification, or 
rehabilitation of projects associated with Federal water resources 
projects, for--
            ``(1) the protection of property;
            ``(2) the protection, restoration, and creation of aquatic 
        and ecologically related habitats, including wetlands; and
            ``(3) the transport and placement of suitable sediment
    ``(b) Secretarial Findings.--Subject to subsection (c), projects 
carried out under subsection (a) may be carried out in any case in 
which the Secretary finds that--
            ``(1) the environmental, economic, and social benefits of 
        the project, both monetary and nonmonetary, justify the cost of 
        the project; and
            ``(2) the project would not result in environmental 
        degradation.
    ``(c) Determination of Planning and Project Costs.--
            ``(1) In general.--In consultation and cooperation with the 
        appropriate Federal, State, regional, and local agencies, the 
        Secretary, acting through the Chief of Engineers, shall develop 
        at Federal expense plans and projects for regional management 
        of sediment obtained in conjunction with construction, 
        operation, and maintenance of Federal water resources projects.
            ``(2) Costs of construction.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Costs associated with 
                construction of a project under this section or 
                identified in a Regional Sediment Management plan shall 
                be limited solely to construction costs that are in 
                excess of those costs necessary to carry out the 
                dredging for construction, operation, or maintenance of 
                an authorized Federal water resources project in the 
                most cost-effective way, consistent with economic, 
                engineering, and environmental criteria.
                    ``(B) Cost sharing.--The determination of any non-
                Federal share of the construction cost shall be based 
                on the cost sharing as specified in subsections (a) 
                through (d) of section 103 of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213), for the type 
                of Federal water resource project using the dredged 
                resource.
                    ``(C) Total cost.--Total Federal costs associated 
                with construction of a project under this section shall 
                not exceed $5,000,000 without Congressional approval.
            ``(3) Operation, maintenance, replacement, and 
        rehabilitation costs.--Operation, maintenance, replacement, and 
        rehabilitation costs associated with a project are a non-
        Federal sponsor responsibility.
    ``(d) Selection of Sediment Disposal Method for Environmental 
Purposes.--
            ``(1) In general.--In developing and carrying out a Federal 
        water resources project involving the disposal of material, the 
        Secretary may select, with the consent of the non-Federal 
        interest, a disposal method that is not the least-cost option 
        if the Secretary determines that the incremental costs of the 
        disposal method are reasonable in relation to the environmental 
        benefits, including the benefits to the aquatic environment to 
        be derived from the creation of wetlands and control of 
        shoreline erosion.
            ``(2) Federal share.--The Federal share of such incremental 
        costs shall be determined in accordance with subsection (c).
    ``(e) State and Regional Plans.--The Secretary, acting through the 
Chief of Engineers, may--
            ``(1) cooperate with any State in the preparation of a 
        comprehensive State or regional coastal sediment management 
        plan within the boundaries of the State;
            ``(2) encourage State participation in the implementation 
        of the plan; and
            ``(3) submit to Congress reports and recommendations with 
        respect to appropriate Federal participation in carrying out 
        the plan.
    ``(f) Priority Areas.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall give priority to regional sediment management projects in the 
vicinity of--
            ``(1) Fire Island Inlet, Suffolk County, New York;
            ``(2) Fletcher Cove, California;
            ``(3) Delaware River Estuary, New Jersey and Pennsylvania; 
        and
            ``(4) Toledo Harbor, Lucas County, Ohio.
    ``(g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000 during each fiscal 
year, to remain available until expended, for the Federal costs 
identified under subsection (c), of which up to $5,000,000 shall be 
used for the development of regional sediment management plans as 
provided in subsection (e).
    ``(h) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any project carried out 
under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit 
entity, with the consent of the affected local government.''.
    (b) Repeal.--
            (1) In general.--Section 145 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j) is repealed.
            (2) Existing projects.--The Secretary, acting through the 
        Chief of Engineers, may complete any project being carried out 
        under section 145 on the day before the date of enactment of 
        this Act.

SEC. 2013. NATIONAL SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing 
Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly 
owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), is amended 
to read as follows:

``SEC. 3. STORM AND HURRICANE RESTORATION AND IMPACT MINIMIZATION 
              PROGRAM.

    ``(a) Construction of Small Shore and Beach Restoration and 
Protection Projects.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may carry out construction 
        of small shore and beach restoration and protection projects 
        not specifically authorized by Congress that otherwise comply 
        with the first section of this Act if the Secretary determines 
        that such construction is advisable.
            ``(2) Local cooperation.--The local cooperation requirement 
        under the first section of this Act shall apply to a project 
        under this section.
            ``(3) Completeness.--A project under this section--
                    ``(A) shall be complete; and
                    ``(B) shall not commit the United States to any 
                additional improvement to ensure the successful 
                operation of the project, except for participation in 
                periodic beach nourishment in accordance with--
                            ``(i) the first section of this Act; and
                            ``(ii) the procedure for projects 
                        authorized after submission of a survey report.
    ``(b) National Shoreline Erosion Control Development and 
Demonstration Program.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary, acting through the Chief 
        of Engineers, shall conduct a national shoreline erosion 
        control development and demonstration program (referred to in 
        this section as the `program').
            ``(2) Requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The program shall include 
                provisions for--
                            ``(i) projects consisting of planning, 
                        design, construction, and adequate monitoring 
                        of prototype engineered and native and 
                        naturalized vegetative shoreline erosion 
                        control devices and methods;
                            ``(ii) detailed engineering and 
                        environmental reports on the results of each 
                        project carried out under the program; and
                            ``(iii) technology transfers, as 
                        appropriate, to private property owners, State 
                        and local entities, nonprofit educational 
                        institutions, and nongovernmental 
                        organizations.
                    ``(B) Determination of feasibility.--A project 
                under this section shall not be carried out until the 
                Secretary, acting through the Chief of Engineers, 
                determines that the project is feasible.
                    ``(C) Emphasis.--A project carried out under the 
                program shall emphasize, to the maximum extent 
                practicable--
                            ``(i) the development and demonstration of 
                        innovative technologies;
                            ``(ii) efficient designs to prevent erosion 
                        at a shoreline site, taking into account the 
                        lifecycle cost of the design, including 
                        cleanup, maintenance, and amortization;
                            ``(iii) new and enhanced shore protection 
                        project design and project formulation tools 
                        the purposes of which are to improve the 
                        physical performance, and lower the lifecycle 
                        costs, of the projects;
                            ``(iv) natural designs, including the use 
                        of native and naturalized vegetation or 
                        temporary structures that minimize permanent 
                        structural alterations to the shoreline;
                            ``(v) the avoidance of negative impacts to 
                        adjacent shorefront communities;
                            ``(vi) the potential for long-term 
                        protection afforded by the technology; and
                            ``(vii) recommendations developed from 
                        evaluations of the program established under 
                        the Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Act 
                        of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962-5 note; 88 Stat. 26), 
                        including--
                                    ``(I) adequate consideration of the 
                                subgrade;
                                    ``(II) proper filtration;
                                    ``(III) durable components;
                                    ``(IV) adequate connection between 
                                units; and
                                    ``(V) consideration of additional 
                                relevant information.
                    ``(D) Sites.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Each project under the 
                        program shall be carried out at--
                                    ``(I) a privately owned site with 
                                substantial public access; or
                                    ``(II) a publicly owned site on 
                                open coast or in tidal waters.
                            ``(ii) Selection.--The Secretary, acting 
                        through the Chief of Engineers, shall develop 
                        criteria for the selection of sites for 
                        projects under the program, including criteria 
                        based on--
                                    ``(I) a variety of geographic and 
                                climatic conditions;
                                    ``(II) the size of the population 
                                that is dependent on the beaches for 
                                recreation or the protection of private 
                                property or public infrastructure;
                                    ``(III) the rate of erosion;
                                    ``(IV) significant natural 
                                resources or habitats and 
                                environmentally sensitive areas; and
                                    ``(V) significant threatened 
                                historic structures or landmarks.
            ``(3) Consultation.--The Secretary, acting through the 
        Chief of Engineers, shall carry out the program in consultation 
        with--
                    ``(A) the Secretary of Agriculture, particularly 
                with respect to native and naturalized vegetative means 
                of preventing and controlling shoreline erosion;
                    ``(B) Federal, State, and local agencies;
                    ``(C) private organizations;
                    ``(D) the Coastal Engineering Research Center 
                established by the first section of Public Law 88-172 
                (33 U.S.C. 426-1); and
                    ``(E) applicable university research facilities.
            ``(4) Completion of demonstration.--After carrying out the 
        initial construction and evaluation of the performance and 
        lifecycle cost of a demonstration project under this section, 
        the Secretary, acting through the Chief of Engineers, may--
                    ``(A) at the request of a non-Federal interest of 
                the project, amend the agreement for a federally-
                authorized shore protection project in existence on the 
                date on which initial construction of the demonstration 
                project is complete to incorporate the demonstration 
                project as a feature of the shore protection project, 
                with the future cost of the demonstration project to be 
                determined by the cost-sharing ratio of the shore 
                protection project; or
                    ``(B) transfer all interest in and responsibility 
                for the completed demonstration project to the non-
                Federal or other Federal agency interest of the 
                project.
            ``(5) Agreements.--The Secretary, acting through the Chief 
        of Engineers, may enter into an agreement with the non-Federal 
        or other Federal agency interest of a project under this 
        section--
                    ``(A) to share the costs of construction, 
                operation, maintenance, and monitoring of a project 
                under the program;
                    ``(B) to share the costs of removing a project or 
                project element constructed under the program, if the 
                Secretary determines that the project or project 
                element is detrimental to private property, public 
                infrastructure, or public safety; or
                    ``(C) to specify ownership of a completed project 
                that the Chief of Engineers determines will not be part 
                of a Corps of Engineers project.
            ``(6) Report.--Not later than December 31 of each year 
        beginning after the date of enactment of this paragraph, the 
        Secretary shall prepare and submit to the Committee on 
        Environment and Public works of the Senate and the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives a report describing--
                    ``(A) the activities carried out and 
                accomplishments made under the program during the 
                preceding year; and
                    ``(B) any recommendations of the Secretary relating 
                to the program.
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            ``(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary 
        may expend, from any appropriations made available to the 
        Secretary for the purpose of carrying out civil works, not more 
        than $30,000,000 during any fiscal year to pay the Federal 
        share of the costs of construction of small shore and beach 
        restoration and protection projects or small projects under the 
        program.
            ``(2) Limitation.--The total amount expended for a project 
        under this section shall--
                    ``(A) be sufficient to pay the cost of Federal 
                participation in the project (including periodic 
                nourishment as provided for under the first section of 
                this Act), as determined by the Secretary; and
                    ``(B) be not more than $3,000,000.''.
    (b) Repeal.--Section 5 the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing 
Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly 
owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426e et seq.; 110 
Stat. 3700) is repealed.

SEC. 2014. SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--In accordance with the Act of July 3, 1930 (33 
U.S.C. 426), and notwithstanding administrative actions, it is the 
policy of the United States to promote shore protection projects and 
related research that encourage the protection, restoration, and 
enhancement of sandy beaches, including beach restoration and periodic 
beach renourishment for a period of 50 years, on a comprehensive and 
coordinated basis by the Federal Government, States, localities, and 
private enterprises.
    (b) Preference.--In carrying out the policy, preference shall be 
given to--
            (1) areas in which there has been a Federal investment of 
        funds; and
            (2) areas with respect to which the need for prevention or 
        mitigation of damage to shores and beaches is attributable to 
        Federal navigation projects or other Federal activities.
    (c) Applicability.--The Secretary shall apply the policy to each 
shore protection and beach renourishment project (including shore 
protection and beach renourishment projects in existence on the date of 
enactment of this Act).

SEC. 2015. COST SHARING FOR MONITORING.

    (a) In General.--Costs incurred for monitoring for an ecosystem 
restoration project shall be cost-shared--
            (1) in accordance with the formula relating to the 
        applicable original construction project; and
            (2) for a maximum period of 10 years.
    (b) Aggregate Limitation.--Monitoring costs for an ecosystem 
restoration project--
            (1) shall not exceed in the aggregate, for a 10-year 
        period, an amount equal to 5 percent of the cost of the 
        applicable original construction project; and
            (2) after the 10-year period, shall be 100 percent non-
        Federal.

SEC. 2016. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION BENEFITS.

    For each of the following projects, the Corps of Engineers shall 
include ecosystem restoration benefits in the calculation of benefits 
for the project:
            (1) Grayson's Creek, California.
            (2) Seven Oaks, California.
            (3) Oxford, California.
            (4) Walnut Creek, California.
            (5) Wildcat Phase II, California.

SEC. 2017. FUNDING TO EXPEDITE THE EVALUATION AND PROCESSING OF 
              PERMITS.

    Section 214 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2201 note; 114 Stat. 2594, 117 Stat. 1836, 119 Stat. 2169, 120 
Stat. 318, 120 Stat. 3197) is amended by striking subsection (c).

SEC. 2018. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PERMIT APPLICATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall implement a program to allow 
electronic submission of permit applications for permits under the 
jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers.
    (b) Limitations.--This section does not preclude the submission of 
a hard copy, as required.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000.

SEC. 2019. IMPROVEMENT OF WATER MANAGEMENT AT CORPS OF ENGINEERS 
              RESERVOIRS.

    (a) In General.--As part of the operation and maintenance, by the 
Corps of Engineers, of reservoirs in operation as of the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall carry out the measures 
described in subsection (c) to support the water resource needs of 
project sponsors and any affected State, local, or tribal government 
for authorized project purposes.
    (b) Cooperation.--The Secretary shall carry out the measures 
described in subsection (c) in cooperation and coordination with 
project sponsors and any affected State, local, or tribal government.
    (c) Measures.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary may--
            (1) conduct a study to identify unused, underused, or 
        additional water storage capacity at reservoirs;
            (2) review an operational plan and identify any change to 
        maximize an authorized project purpose to improve water storage 
        capacity and enhance efficiency of releases and withdrawal of 
        water;
            (3) improve and update data, data collection, and 
        forecasting models to maximize an authorized project purpose 
        and improve water storage capacity and delivery to water users; 
        and
            (4) conduct a sediment study and implement any sediment 
        management or removal measure.
    (d) Revenues for Special Cases.--
            (1) Costs of water supply storage.--In the case of a 
        reservoir operated or maintained by the Corps of Engineers on 
        the date of enactment of this Act, the storage charge for a 
        future contract or contract renewal for the first cost of water 
        supply storage at the reservoir shall be the lesser of the 
        estimated cost of purposes foregone, replacement costs, or the 
        updated cost of storage.
            (2) Reallocation.--In the case of a water supply that is 
        reallocated from another project purpose to municipal or 
        industrial water supply, the joint use costs for the reservoir 
        shall be adjusted to reflect the reallocation of project 
        purposes.
            (3) Credit for affected project purposes.--In the case of a 
        reallocation that adversely affects hydropower generation, the 
        Secretary shall defer to the Administrator of the respective 
        Power Marketing Administration to calculate the impact of such 
        a reallocation on the rates for hydroelectric power.
    (e) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section affects any authority 
in existence on the date of enactment of this Act under--
            (1) the Water Supply Act of 1958 (72 Stat 319);
            (2) the Act of December 22, 1944 (commonly known as the 
        ``Flood Control Act of 1944'') (58 Stat. 887, chapter 665);
            (3) the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
        4082); or
            (4) section 322 of the Water Resource Development Act of 
        1990 (33 U.S.C. 2324).

SEC. 2020. FEDERAL HOPPER DREDGES.

    Section 3(c)(7)(B) of the Act of August 11, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 622; 25 
Stat. 423), is amended by adding at the end the following: ``This 
subparagraph shall not apply to the Federal hopper dredges Essayons and 
Yaquina of the Corps of Engineers.''.

SEC. 2021. EXTRAORDINARY RAINFALL EVENTS.

    In the State of Louisiana, extraordinary rainfall events such as 
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, which occurred during calendar year 2005, 
and Hurricane Andrew, which occurred during calendar year 1992, shall 
not be considered in making a determination with respect to the 
ordinary high water mark for purposes of carrying out section 10 of the 
Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403) (commonly known as the ``Rivers 
and Harbors Act'').

SEC. 2022. WILDFIRE FIREFIGHTING.

    Section 309 of Public Law 102-154 (42 U.S.C. 1856a-1; 105 Stat. 
1034) is amended by inserting ``the Secretary of the Army,'' after 
``the Secretary of Energy,''.

SEC. 2023. NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS AS SPONSORS.

    Section 221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``A non-Federal interest shall be'' and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(1) In general.--In this section, the term `non-Federal 
        interest' means''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Inclusions.--The term `non-Federal interest' includes 
        a nonprofit organization acting with the consent of the 
        affected unit of government.''.

SEC. 2024. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) Project Tracking.--The Secretary shall assign a unique tracking 
number to each water resources project under the jurisdiction of the 
Secretary, to be used by each Federal agency throughout the life of the 
project.
    (b) Report Repository.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall maintain at the 
        Library of Congress a copy of each final feasibility study, 
        final environmental impact statement, final reevaluation 
        report, record of decision, and report to Congress prepared by 
        the Corps of Engineers.
            (2) Availability to public.--
                    (A) In general.--Each document described in 
                paragraph (1) shall be made available to the public for 
                review, and an electronic copy of each document shall 
                be made permanently available to the public through the 
                Internet website of the Corps of Engineers.
                    (B) Cost.--The Secretary shall charge the requestor 
                for the cost of duplication of the requested document.

SEC. 2025. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION.

    Sections 101, 106, and 108 of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103; 119 Stat. 2252-2254), are 
repealed.

SEC. 2026. EXTENSION OF SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Before the date on which the applicable period for 
Federal financial participation in a shore protection project 
terminates, the Secretary, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is 
authorized to review the shore protection project to determine whether 
it would be feasible to extend the period of Federal financial 
participation relating to the project.
    (b) Report.--The Secretary shall submit to Congress a report 
describing the results of each review conducted under subsection (a).

SEC. 2027. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.

    Section 203 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2269) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``carry out 
                water-related planning activities and'' after ``the 
                Secretary may''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2)--
                            (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking 
                        ``and'' at the end;
                            (ii) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as 
                        subparagraph (C); and
                            (iii) by inserting after subparagraph (A) 
                        the following:
                    ``(B) watershed assessments and planning 
                activities.''; and
            (2) in subsection (e), by striking ``2006'' and inserting 
        ``2012''.

SEC. 2028. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 579a) is amended as follows:
            (1) In the first sentence by striking ``two years'' and 
        inserting ``year'';
            (2) In the last sentence by striking ``30 months after the 
        date'' and inserting ``the last date of the fiscal year 
        following the fiscal year in which''; and
            (3) In the last sentence by striking ``such 30 month 
        period'' and inserting ``such period''.

              Subtitle B--Continuing Authorities Projects

SEC. 2031. NAVIGATION ENHANCEMENTS FOR WATERBORNE TRANSPORTATION.

    Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``sec. 107. (a) That the Secretary of the 
        Army is hereby authorized to'' and inserting the following:

``SEC. 107. NAVIGATION ENHANCEMENTS FOR WATERBORNE TRANSPORTATION.

    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary of the Army may'';
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``(b) Not more'' and inserting the 
                following:
    ``(b) Allotment.--Not more''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$4,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$7,000,000'';
            (3) in subsection (c), by striking ``(c) Local'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(c) Local Contributions.--Local'';
            (4) in subsection (d), by striking ``(d) Non-Federal'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(d) Non-Federal Share.--Non-Federal'';
            (5) in subsection (e), by striking ``(e) Each'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(e) Completion.--Each''; and
            (6) in subsection (f), by striking ``(f) This'' and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(f) Applicability.--This''.

SEC. 2032. PROTECTION AND RESTORATION DUE TO EMERGENCIES AT SHORES AND 
              STREAMBANKS.

    Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r) is 
amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting ``$1,500,000''.

SEC. 2033. RESTORATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT FOR PROTECTION OF AQUATIC AND 
              RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEMS PROGRAM.

    Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330) is amended--
            (1) by striking the section heading and inserting the 
        following:

``SEC. 206. RESTORATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT FOR PROTECTION OF AQUATIC 
              AND RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEMS PROGRAM.'';

            (2) in subsection (a), by striking ``an aquatic'' and 
        inserting ``a freshwater aquatic''; and
            (3) in subsection (e), by striking ``$25,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$30,000,000''.

SEC. 2034. ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION OF PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT AND 
              RESTORATION OF ECOSYSTEMS PROGRAM.

    Section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2309a) is amended--
            (1) by striking the section heading and inserting the 
        following:

``SEC. 1135. ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION OF PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT AND 
              RESTORATION OF ECOSYSTEMS PROGRAM.'';

            and
            (2) in subsection (h), by striking ``$25,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$30,000,000''.

SEC. 2035. PROJECTS TO ENHANCE ESTUARIES AND COASTAL HABITATS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out an estuary habitat 
restoration project if the Secretary determines that the project--
            (1) will improve the elements and features of an estuary 
        (as defined in section 103 of the Estuaries and Clean Waters 
        Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2902));
            (2) is in the public interest; and
            (3) is cost-effective.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
construction of any project under this section--
            (1) shall be 35 percent; and
            (2) shall include the costs of all land, easements, rights-
        of-way, and necessary relocations.
    (c) Agreements.--Construction of a project under this section shall 
commence only after a non-Federal interest has entered into a binding 
agreement with the Secretary to pay--
            (1) the non-Federal share of the costs of construction 
        required under subsection (b); and
            (2) in accordance with regulations promulgated by the 
        Secretary, 100 percent of the costs of any operation, 
        maintenance, replacement, or rehabilitation of the project.
    (d) Limitation.--Not more than $5,000,000 in Federal funds may be 
allocated under this section for a project at any 1 location.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2008 through 2011.

SEC. 2036. REMEDIATION OF ABANDONED MINE SITES.

    Section 560 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (33 
U.S.C. 2336; 113 Stat. 354-355) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (f);
            (2) by redesignating subsections (a) through (e) as 
        subsections (b) through (f), respectively;
            (3) by inserting before subsection (b) (as redesignated by 
        paragraph (2)) the following:
    ``(a) Definition of Non-Federal Interest.--In this section, the 
term `non-Federal interest' includes, with the consent of the affected 
local government, nonprofit entities, notwithstanding section 221 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b).'';
            (4) in subsection (b) (as redesignated by paragraph (2))--
                    (A) by inserting ``, and construction'' before 
                ``assistance''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, including, with the consent of 
                the affected local government, nonprofit entities,'' 
                after ``non-Federal interests'';
            (5) in paragraph (3) of subsection (c) (as redesignated by 
        paragraph (2))--
                    (A) by inserting ``physical hazards and'' after 
                ``adverse''; and
                    (B) by striking ``drainage from'';
            (6) in subsection (d) (as redesignated by paragraph (2)), 
        by striking ``50'' and inserting ``25''; and
            (7) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Operation and Maintenance.--The non-Federal share of the 
costs of operation and maintenance for a project carried out under this 
section shall be 100 percent.
    ``(h) No Effect on Liability.--The provision of assistance under 
this section shall not relieve from liability any person that would 
otherwise be liable under Federal or State law for damages, response 
costs, natural resource damages, restitution, equitable relief, or any 
other relief.
    ``(i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section, for each of fiscal years 2008 
through 2011, $20,000,000, to remain available until expended.''.

SEC. 2037. SMALL PROJECTS FOR THE REHABILITATION AND REMOVAL OF DAMS.

    (a) Authorization.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may carry out a small dam 
        removal or rehabilitation project if the Secretary determines 
        that the project will improve the quality of the environment or 
        is in the public interest.
            (2) Priority projects.--In carrying out this section, the 
        Secretary shall give priority to carrying out the following 
        small dam removal or rehabilitation projects:
                    (A) Mountain Park, Georgia.
                    (B) Keith Creek, Rockford, Illinois.
                    (C) Mount Zion Mill Pond Dam, Fulton County, 
                Indiana.
                    (D) Hamilton Dam, Flint River, Michigan.
                    (E) Ingham Spring Dam, Solebury Township, 
                Pennsylvania.
                    (F) Stillwater Lake Dam, Monroe County, 
                Pennsylvania.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--A non-Federal interest shall provide 35 percent 
of the cost of the removal or remediation of any project carried out 
under this section, including provision of all land, easements, rights-
of-way, and necessary relocations.
    (c) Agreements.--Construction of a project under this section shall 
be commenced only after a non-Federal interest has entered into a 
binding agreement with the Secretary to pay--
            (1) the non-Federal share of the costs of construction 
        required by this section; and
            (2) 100 percent of any operation and maintenance cost.
    (d) Cost Limitation.--Not more than $5,000,000 in Federal funds may 
be allotted under this section for a project at any single location.
    (e) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
this section $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2011.

SEC. 2038. REMOTE, MARITIME-DEPENDENT COMMUNITIES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall develop eligibility criteria 
for Federal participation in navigation projects located in 
economically disadvantaged communities that are--
            (1) dependent on water transportation for subsistence; and
            (2) located in--
                    (A) remote areas of the United States;
                    (B) American Samoa;
                    (C) Guam;
                    (D) the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
                Islands;
                    (E) the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; or
                    (F) the United States Virgin Islands.
    (b) Administration.--The criteria developed under this section--
            (1) shall--
                    (A) provide for economic expansion; and
                    (B) identify opportunities for promoting economic 
                growth; and
            (2) shall not require project justification solely on the 
        basis of National Economic Development benefits received.

SEC. 2039. AGREEMENTS FOR WATER RESOURCE PROJECTS.

    (a) Partnership Agreements.--Section 221 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (g); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Public Health and Safety.--If the Secretary determines that a 
project needs to be continued for the purpose of public health and 
safety--
            ``(1) the non-Federal interest shall pay the increased 
        projects costs, up to an amount equal to 20 percent of the 
        original estimated project costs and in accordance with the 
        statutorily-determined cost share; and
            ``(2) notwithstanding the statutorily-determined Federal 
        share, the Secretary shall pay all increased costs remaining 
        after payment of 20 percent of the increased costs by the non-
        Federal interest under paragraph (1).
    ``(f) Limitation.--Nothing in subsection (a) limits the authority 
of the Secretary to ensure that a partnership agreement meets the 
requirements of law and policies of the Secretary in effect on the date 
of execution of the partnership agreement.''.
    (b) Local Cooperation.--Section 912(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4190) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) in the first sentence, by striking ``shall'' 
                and inserting ``may''; and
                    (B) by striking the second sentence; and
            (2) in paragraph (4)--
                    (A) in the first sentence--
                            (i) by striking ``injunction, for'' and 
                        inserting ``injunction and payment of 
                        liquidated damages, for''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``to collect a civil 
                        penalty imposed under this section,''; and
                    (B) in the second sentence, by striking ``any civil 
                penalty imposed under this section,'' and inserting 
                ``any liquidated damages,''.
    (c) Applicability.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only to 
        partnership agreements entered into after the date of enactment 
        of this Act.
            (2) Exception.--Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the district 
        engineer for the district in which a project is located may 
        amend the partnership agreement for the project entered into on 
        or before the date of enactment of this Act--
                    (A) at the request of a non-Federal interest for a 
                project; and
                    (B) if construction on the project has not been 
                initiated as of the date of enactment of this Act.
    (d) References.--
            (1) Cooperation agreements.--Any reference in a law, 
        regulation, document, or other paper of the United States to a 
        cooperation agreement or project cooperation agreement shall be 
        considered to be a reference to a partnership agreement or a 
        project partnership agreement, respectively.
            (2) Partnership agreements.--Any reference to a partnership 
        agreement or project partnership agreement in this Act (other 
        than in this section) shall be considered to be a reference to 
        a cooperation agreement or a project cooperation agreement, 
        respectively.

SEC. 2040. PROGRAM NAMES.

    Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) is 
amended by striking ``sec. 205. That the'' and inserting the following:

``SEC. 205. PROJECTS TO ENHANCE REDUCTION OF FLOODING AND OBTAIN RISK 
              MINIMIZATION.

    ``The''.

               Subtitle C--National Levee Safety Program

SEC. 2051. SHORT TITLE.

    This subtitle may be cited as the ``National Levee Safety Program 
Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2052. DEFINITIONS.

    In this subtitle:
            (1) Assessment.--The term ``assessment'' means the periodic 
        engineering evaluation of a levee by a registered professional 
        engineer to--
                    (A) review the engineering features of the levee; 
                and
                    (B) develop a risk-based performance evaluation of 
                the levee, taking into consideration potential 
                consequences of failure or overtopping of the levee.
            (2) Committee.--The term ``Committee'' means the National 
        Levee Safety Committee established by section 2053(a).
            (3) Inspection.--The term ``inspection'' means an annual 
        review of a levee to verify whether the owner or operator of 
        the levee is conducting required operation and maintenance in 
        accordance with established levee maintenance standards.
            (4) Levee.--The term ``levee'' means an embankment 
        (including a floodwall) that--
                    (A) is designed, constructed, or operated for the 
                purpose of flood or storm damage reduction;
                    (B) reduces the risk of loss of human life or risk 
                to the public safety; and
                    (C) is not otherwise defined as a dam by the 
                Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety.
            (5) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers.
            (6) State.--The term ``State'' means--
                    (A) a State;
                    (B) the District of Columbia;
                    (C) the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and
                    (D) any other territory or possession of the United 
                States.
            (7) State levee safety agency.--The term ``State levee 
        safety agency'' means the State agency that has regulatory 
        authority over the safety of any non-Federal levee in a State.
            (8) United states.--The term ``United States'', when used 
        in a geographical sense, means all of the States.

SEC. 2053. NATIONAL LEVEE SAFETY COMMITTEE.

    (a) Establishment.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a National 
        Levee Safety Committee, consisting of representatives of 
        Federal agencies and State, tribal, and local governments, in 
        accordance with this subsection.
            (2) Federal agencies.--
                    (A) In general.--The head of each Federal agency 
                and the head of the International Boundary Waters 
                Commission may designate a representative to serve on 
                the Committee.
                    (B) Action by secretary.--The Secretary shall 
                ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that--
                            (i) each Federal agency that designs, owns, 
                        operates, or maintains a levee is represented 
                        on the Committee; and
                            (ii) each Federal agency that has 
                        responsibility for emergency preparedness or 
                        response activities is represented on the 
                        Committee.
            (3) Tribal, state, and local governments.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall appoint 8 
                members to the Committee--
                            (i) 3 of whom shall represent tribal 
                        governments affected by levees, based on 
                        recommendations of tribal governments;
                            (ii) 3 of whom shall represent State levee 
                        safety agencies, based on recommendations of 
                        Governors of the States; and
                            (iii) 2 of whom shall represent local 
                        governments, based on recommendations of 
                        Governors of the States.
                    (B) Requirement.--In appointing members under 
                subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall ensure broad 
                geographic representation, to the maximum extent 
                practicable.
            (4) Chairperson.--The Secretary shall serve as Chairperson 
        of the Committee.
            (5) Other members.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        Committee, may invite to participate in meetings of the 
        Committee, as appropriate, 1 or more of the following:
                    (A) Representatives of the National Laboratories.
                    (B) Levee safety experts.
                    (C) Environmental organizations.
                    (D) Members of private industry.
                    (E) Any other individual or entity, as the 
                Committee determines to be appropriate.
    (b) Duties.--
            (1) In general.--The Committee shall--
                    (A) advise the Secretary in implementing the 
                national levee safety program under section 2054;
                    (B) support the establishment and maintenance of 
                effective programs, policies, and guidelines to enhance 
                levee safety for the protection of human life and 
                property throughout the United States; and
                    (C) support coordination and information exchange 
                between Federal agencies and State levee safety 
                agencies that share common problems and 
                responsibilities relating to levee safety, including 
                planning, design, construction, operation, emergency 
                action planning, inspections, maintenance, regulation 
                or licensing, technical or financial assistance, 
                research, and data management.
    (c) Powers.--
            (1) Information from federal agencies.--
                    (A) In general.--The Committee may secure directly 
                from a Federal agency such information as the Committee 
                considers to be necessary to carry out this section.
                    (B) Provision of information.--On request of the 
                Committee, the head of a Federal agency shall provide 
                the information to the Committee.
            (2) Contracts.--The Committee may enter into any contract 
        the Committee determines to be necessary to carry out a duty of 
        the Committee.
    (d) Working Groups.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may establish working groups 
        to assist the Committee in carrying out this section.
            (2) Membership.--A working group under paragraph (1) shall 
        be composed of--
                    (A) members of the Committee; and
                    (B) any other individual, as the Secretary 
                determines to be appropriate.
    (e) Compensation of Members.--
            (1) Federal employees.--A member of the Committee who is an 
        officer or employee of the United States shall serve without 
        compensation in addition to compensation received for the 
        services of the member as an officer or employee of the United 
        States.
            (2) Other members.--A member of the Committee who is not an 
        officer or employee of the United States shall serve without 
        compensation.
    (f) Travel Expenses.--
            (1) Representatives of federal agencies.--To the extent 
        amounts are made available in advance in appropriations Acts, a 
        member of the Committee who represents a Federal agency shall 
        be reimbursed with appropriations for travel expenses by the 
        agency of the member, including per diem in lieu of 
        subsistence, at rates authorized for an employee of an agency 
        under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States 
        Code, while away from home or regular place of business of the 
        member in the performance of services for the Committee.
            (2) Other individuals.--To the extent amounts are made 
        available in advance in appropriations Acts, a member of the 
        Committee who represents a State levee safety agency, a member 
        of the Committee who represents the private sector, and a 
        member of a working group created under subsection (d) shall be 
        reimbursed for travel expenses by the Secretary, including per 
        diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for an 
        employee of an agency under subchapter 1 of chapter 57 of title 
        5, United States Code, while away from home or regular place of 
        business of the member in performance of services for the 
        Committee.
    (g) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the Committee.

SEC. 2054. NATIONAL LEVEE SAFETY PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with the Committee 
and State levee safety agencies, shall establish and maintain a 
national levee safety program.
    (b) Purposes.--The purposes of the program under this section are--
            (1) to ensure that new and existing levees are safe through 
        the development of technologically and economically feasible 
        programs and procedures for hazard reduction relating to 
        levees;
            (2) to encourage appropriate engineering policies and 
        procedures to be used for levee site investigation, design, 
        construction, operation and maintenance, and emergency 
        preparedness;
            (3) to encourage the establishment and implementation of 
        effective levee safety programs in each State;
            (4) to develop and support public education and awareness 
        projects to increase public acceptance and support of State 
        levee safety programs;
            (5) to develop technical assistance materials for Federal 
        and State levee safety programs;
            (6) to develop methods of providing technical assistance 
        relating to levee safety to non-Federal entities; and
            (7) to develop technical assistance materials, seminars, 
        and guidelines to improve the security of levees in the United 
        States.
    (c) Strategic Plan.--In carrying out the program under this 
section, the Secretary, in coordination with the Committee, shall 
prepare a strategic plan--
            (1) to establish goals, priorities, and target dates to 
        improve the safety of levees in the United States;
            (2) to cooperate and coordinate with, and provide 
        assistance to, State levee safety agencies, to the maximum 
        extent practicable;
            (3) to share information among Federal agencies, State and 
        local governments, and private entities relating to levee 
        safety; and
            (4) to provide information to the public relating to risks 
        associated with levee failure or overtopping.
    (d) Federal Guidelines.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out the program under this 
        section, the Secretary, in coordination with the Committee, 
        shall establish Federal guidelines relating to levee safety.
            (2) Incorporation of federal activities.--The Federal 
        guidelines under paragraph (1) shall incorporate, to the 
        maximum extent practicable, any activity carried out by a 
        Federal agency as of the date on which the guidelines are 
        established.
    (e) Incorporation of Existing Activities.--The program under this 
section shall incorporate, to the maximum extent practicable--
            (1) any activity carried out by a State or local 
        government, or a private entity, relating to the construction, 
        operation, or maintenance of a levee; and
            (2) any activity carried out by a Federal agency to support 
        an effort by a State levee safety agency to develop and 
        implement an effective levee safety program.
    (f) Inventory of Levees.--The Secretary shall develop, maintain, 
and periodically publish an inventory of levees in the United States, 
including the results of any levee assessment conducted under this 
section and inspection.
    (g) Assessments of Levees.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), as 
        soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, 
        the Secretary shall conduct an assessment of each levee in the 
        United States that protects human life or the public safety to 
        determine the potential for a failure or overtopping of the 
        levee that would pose a risk of loss of human life or a risk to 
        the public safety.
            (2) Exception.--The Secretary may exclude from assessment 
        under paragraph (1) any non-Federal levee the failure or 
        overtopping of which would not pose a risk of loss of human 
        life or a risk to the public safety.
            (3) Prioritization.--In determining the order in which to 
        assess levees under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall give 
        priority to levees the failure or overtopping of which would 
        constitute the highest risk of loss of human life or a risk to 
        the public safety, as determined by the Secretary.
            (4) Determination.--In assessing levees under paragraph 
        (1), the Secretary shall take into consideration the potential 
        of a levee to fail or overtop because of--
                    (A) hydrologic or hydraulic conditions;
                    (B) storm surges;
                    (C) geotechnical conditions;
                    (D) inadequate operating procedures;
                    (E) structural, mechanical, or design deficiencies; 
                or
                    (F) other conditions that exist or may occur in the 
                vicinity of the levee.
            (5) State participation.--On request of a State levee 
        safety agency, with respect to any levee the failure of which 
        would affect the State, the Secretary shall--
                    (A) provide information to the State levee safety 
                agency relating to the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the levee; and
                    (B) allow an official of the State levee safety 
                agency to participate in the assessment of the levee.
            (6) Report.--As soon as practicable after the date on which 
        a levee is assessed under this section, the Secretary shall 
        provide to the Governor of the State in which the levee is 
        located a notice describing the results of the assessment, 
        including--
                    (A) a description of the results of the assessment 
                under this subsection;
                    (B) a description of any hazardous condition 
                discovered during the assessment; and
                    (C) on request of the Governor, information 
                relating to any remedial measure necessary to mitigate 
                or avoid any hazardous condition discovered during the 
                assessment.
            (7) Subsequent assessments.--
                    (A) In general.--After the date on which a levee is 
                initially assessed under this subsection, the Secretary 
                shall conduct a subsequent assessment of the levee not 
                less frequently than once every 5 years.
                    (B) State assessment of non-federal levees.--
                            (i) In general.--Each State shall conduct 
                        assessments of non-Federal levees located 
                        within the State in accordance with the 
                        applicable State levee safety program.
                            (ii) Availability of information.--Each 
                        State shall make the results of the assessments 
                        under clause (i) available for inclusion in the 
                        national inventory under subsection (f).
                            (iii) Non-federal levees.--
                                    (I) In general.--On request of the 
                                Governor of a State, the Secretary may 
                                assess a non-Federal levee in the 
                                State.
                                    (II) Cost.--The State shall pay 100 
                                percent of the cost of an assessment 
                                under subclause (I).
                                    (III) Funding.--The Secretary may 
                                accept funds from any levee owner for 
                                the purposes of conducting engineering 
                                assessments to determine the 
                                performance and structural integrity of 
                                a levee.
    (h) State Levee Safety Programs.--
            (1) Assistance to states.--In carrying out the program 
        under this section, the Secretary shall provide funds to State 
        levee safety agencies (or another appropriate State agency, as 
        designated by the Governor of the State) to assist States in 
        establishing, maintaining, and improving levee safety programs.
            (2) Application.--
                    (A) In general.--To receive funds under this 
                subsection, a State levee safety agency shall submit to 
                the Secretary an application in such time, in such 
                manner, and containing such information as the 
                Secretary may require.
                    (B) Inclusion.--An application under subparagraph 
                (A) shall include an agreement between the State levee 
                safety agency and the Secretary under which the State 
                levee safety agency shall, in accordance with State 
                law--
                            (i) review and approve plans and 
                        specifications to construct, enlarge, modify, 
                        remove, or abandon a levee in the State;
                            (ii) perform periodic evaluations during 
                        levee construction to ensure compliance with 
                        the approved plans and specifications;
                            (iii) approve the construction of a levee 
                        in the State before the date on which the levee 
                        becomes operational;
                            (iv) assess, at least once every 5 years, 
                        all levees and reservoirs in the State the 
                        failure of which would cause a significant risk 
                        of loss of human life or risk to the public 
                        safety to determine whether the levees and 
                        reservoirs are safe;
                            (v) establish a procedure for more detailed 
                        and frequent safety evaluations;
                            (vi) ensure that assessments are led by a 
                        State-registered professional engineer with 
                        related experience in levee design and 
                        construction;
                            (vii) issue notices, if necessary, to 
                        require owners of levees to perform necessary 
                        maintenance or remedial work, improve security, 
                        revise operating procedures, or take other 
                        actions, including breaching levees;
                            (viii) contribute funds to--
                                    (I) ensure timely repairs or other 
                                changes to, or removal of, a levee in 
                                order to reduce the risk of loss of 
                                human life and the risk to public 
                                safety; and
                                    (II) if the owner of a levee does 
                                not take an action described in 
                                subclause (I), take appropriate action 
                                as expeditiously as practicable;
                            (ix) establish a system of emergency 
                        procedures and emergency response plans to be 
                        used if a levee fails or if the failure of a 
                        levee is imminent;
                            (x) identify--
                                    (I) each levee the failure of which 
                                could be reasonably expected to 
                                endanger human life;
                                    (II) the maximum area that could be 
                                flooded if a levee failed; and
                                    (III) necessary public facilities 
                                that would be affected by the flooding; 
                                and
                            (xi) for the period during which the funds 
                        are provided, maintain or exceed the aggregate 
                        expenditures of the State during the 2 fiscal 
                        years preceding the fiscal year during which 
                        the funds are provided to ensure levee safety.
            (3) Determination of secretary.--
                    (A) In general.--Not later than 120 days after the 
                date on which the Secretary receives an application 
                under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall approve or 
                disapprove the application.
                    (B) Notice of disapproval.--If the Secretary 
                disapproves an application under subparagraph (A), the 
                Secretary shall immediately provide to the State levee 
                safety agency a written notice of the disapproval, 
                including a description of--
                            (i) the reasons for the disapproval; and
                            (ii) changes necessary for approval of the 
                        application, if any.
                    (C) Failure to determine.--If the Secretary fails 
                to make a determination by the deadline under 
                subparagraph (A), the application shall be considered 
                to be approved.
            (4) Review of state levee safety programs.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary, in conjunction with 
                the Committee, may periodically review any program 
                carried out using funds under this subsection.
                    (B) Inadequate programs.--If the Secretary 
                determines under a review under subparagraph (A) that a 
                program is inadequate to reasonably protect human life 
                and property, the Secretary shall, until the Secretary 
                determines the program to be adequate--
                            (i) revoke the approval of the program; and
                            (ii) withhold assistance under this 
                        subsection.
    (i) Reporting.--Not later than 90 days after the end of each odd-
numbered fiscal year, the Secretary, in consultation with the 
Committee, shall submit to Congress a report describing--
            (1) the status of the program under this section;
            (2) the progress made by Federal agencies during the 2 
        preceding fiscal years in implementing Federal guidelines for 
        levee safety;
            (3) the progress made by State levee safety agencies 
        participating in the program; and
            (4) recommendations for legislative or other action that 
        the Secretary considers to be necessary, if any.
    (j) Research.--The Secretary, in coordination with the Committee, 
shall carry out a program of technical and archival research to develop 
and support--
            (1) improved techniques, historical experience, and 
        equipment for rapid and effective levee construction, 
        rehabilitation, and assessment or inspection;
            (2) the development of devices for the continued monitoring 
        of levee safety;
            (3) the development and maintenance of information 
        resources systems required to manage levee safety projects; and
            (4) public policy initiatives and other improvements 
        relating to levee safety engineering, security, and management.
    (k) Participation by State Levee Safety Agencies.--In carrying out 
the levee safety program under this section, the Secretary shall--
            (1) solicit participation from State levee safety agencies; 
        and
            (2) periodically update State levee safety agencies and 
        Congress on the status of the program.
    (l) Levee Safety Training.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
Committee, shall establish a program under which the Secretary shall 
provide training for State levee safety agency staff and inspectors to 
a State that has, or intends to develop, a State levee safety program, 
on request of the State.
    (m) Effect of Subtitle.--Nothing in this subtitle--
            (1) creates any Federal liability relating to the recovery 
        of a levee caused by an action or failure to act;
            (2) relieves an owner or operator of a levee of any legal 
        duty, obligation, or liability relating to the ownership or 
        operation of the levee; or
            (3) except as provided in subsection (g)(7)(B)(iii)(III), 
        preempts any applicable Federal or State law.

SEC. 2055. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary--
            (1) $20,000,000 to establish and maintain the inventory 
        under section 2054(f);
            (2) $42,000,000 to carry out levee safety assessments under 
        section 2054(g);
            (3) to provide funds for State levee safety programs under 
        section 2054(h)--
                    (A) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2007; and
                    (B) $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 
                through 2011;
            (4) $2,000,000 to carry out research under section 2054(j);
            (5) $1,000,000 to carry out levee safety training under 
        section 2054(l); and
            (6) $150,000 to provide travel expenses to members of the 
        Committee under section 2053(f).

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 3001. ST. HERMAN AND ST. PAUL HARBORS, KODIAK, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency basis, necessary 
removal of rubble, sediment, and rock impeding the entrance to the St. 
Herman and St. Paul Harbors, Kodiak, Alaska, at a Federal cost of 
$2,000,000.

SEC. 3002. SITKA, ALASKA.

    The Sitka, Alaska, element of the project for navigation, Southeast 
Alaska Harbors of Refuge, Alaska, authorized by section 101 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4801), is modified 
to direct the Secretary to take such action as is necessary to correct 
design deficiencies in the Sitka Harbor Breakwater, at full Federal 
expense. The estimated cost is $6,300,000.

SEC. 3003. BLACK WARRIOR-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALABAMA.

    Section 111 of title I of division C of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2005 (118 Stat. 2944), is amended by striking 
subsections (a) and (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(a) Construction of New Facilities.--
            ``(1) Definitions.--In this subsection:
                    ``(A) Existing facility.--The term `existing 
                facility' means the administrative and maintenance 
                facility for the project for Black Warrior-Tombigbee 
                Rivers, Alabama, in existence on the date of enactment 
                of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007.
                    ``(B) Parcel.--The term `Parcel' means the land 
                owned by the Federal Government in the City of 
                Tuscaloosa, Alabama, as in existence on the date of 
                enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 
                2007.
            ``(2) Authorization.--In carrying out the project for Black 
        Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers, Alabama, the Secretary is 
        authorized--
                    ``(A) to purchase land on which the Secretary may 
                construct a new maintenance facility, to be located--
                            ``(i) at a different location from the 
                        existing facility; and
                            ``(ii) in the vicinity of the City of 
                        Tuscaloosa, Alabama;
                    ``(B) at any time during or after the completion 
                of, and relocation to, the new maintenance facility--
                            ``(i) to demolish the existing facility; 
                        and
                            ``(ii) to carry out any necessary 
                        environmental clean-up of the Parcel, all at 
                        full Federal expense; and
                    ``(C) to construct on the Parcel a new 
                administrative facility.
    ``(b) Acquisition and Disposition of Property.--The Secretary--
            ``(1) may acquire any real property necessary for the 
        construction of the new maintenance facility under subsection 
        (a)(2)(A); and
            ``(2) shall convey to the City of Tuscaloosa fee simple 
        title in and to any portion of the Parcel not required for 
        construction of the new administrative facility under 
        subsection (a)(2)(C) through--
                    ``(A) sale at fair market value;
                    ``(B) exchange of other Federal land on an acre-
                for-acre basis; or
                    ``(C) another form of transfer.''.

SEC. 3004. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, ARIZONA.

    The project for flood control, Nogales Wash and tributaries, 
Arizona, authorized by section 101(a)(4) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606; 110 Stat. 3711; 114 Stat. 
2600), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
at a total cost of $25,410,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$22,930,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,480,000.

SEC. 3005. RIO DE FLAG, FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Rio De Flag, Flagstaff, 
Arizona, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2576), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of $54,100,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $35,000,000 and a non-Federal cost of 
$19,100,000.

SEC. 3006. TUCSON DRAINAGE AREA (TUCSON ARROYO), ARIZONA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, environmental restoration, 
and recreation, Tucson Drainage Area (Tucson Arroyo), Arizona, 
authorized by section 101(a)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1999 (113 Stat. 274), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project at a total cost of $66,700,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $43,350,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$23,350,000.

SEC. 3007. AUGUSTA AND CLARENDON, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary may carry out rehabilitation of authorized and 
completed levees on the White River between Augusta and Clarendon, 
Arkansas, at a total estimated cost of $8,000,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $5,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$2,800,000.

SEC. 3008. EASTERN ARKANSAS ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY, ARKANSAS.

    Federal assistance made available under the rural enterprise zone 
program of the Department of Agriculture may be used toward payment of 
the non-Federal share of the costs of the project described in section 
219(c)(20) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
4835; 114 Stat. 2763A-219), if the funds are authorized to be used for 
the purpose of that project.

SEC. 3009. RED-OUACHITA RIVER BASIN LEVEES, ARKANSAS AND LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--Section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 
Stat. 170) is amended in the matter under the heading ``RED-OUACHITA 
RIVER BASIN'' by striking ``at Calion, Arkansas'' and inserting 
``improvements at Calion, Arkansas (including authorization for the 
comprehensive flood-control project for Ouachita River and tributaries, 
incorporating in the project all flood control, drainage, and power 
improvements in the basin above the lower end of the left bank Ouachita 
River levee)''.
    (b) Modification.--Section 3 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (55 
Stat. 642, chapter 377), is amended in the second sentence of 
subsection (a) in the matter under the heading ``LOWER MISSISSIPPI 
RIVER'' by inserting before the period at the end the following: 
``Provided, That the Ouachita River Levees, Louisiana, authorized by 
the first section of the Act of May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 534, chapter 
569), shall remain as a component of the Mississippi River and 
Tributaries Project and afforded operation and maintenance 
responsibilities as directed in section 3 of that Act (45 Stat. 535)''.

SEC. 3010. ST. FRANCIS BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, St. Francis River 
Basin, Arkansas, and Missouri, authorized the Act of June 15, 1936 (49 
Stat. 1508, chapter 548), as modified, is further modified to authorize 
the Secretary to undertake channel stabilization and sediment removal 
measures on the St. Francis River and tributaries as an integral part 
of the original project.
    (b) No Separable Element.--The measures undertaken under subsection 
(a) shall not be considered to be a separable element of the project.

SEC. 3011. ST. FRANCIS BASIN LAND TRANSFER, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall convey to the State of 
Arkansas, without monetary consideration and subject to subsection (b), 
all right, title, and interest to land within the State acquired by the 
Federal Government as mitigation land for the project for flood 
control, St. Francis Basin, Arkansas and Missouri Project, authorized 
by the Act of May 15, 1928 (33 U.S.C. 702a et seq.) (commonly known as 
the ``Flood Control Act of 1928'').
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--
            (1) In general.--The conveyance by the United States under 
        this section shall be subject to--
                    (A) the condition that the State of Arkansas 
                (including the successors and assigns of the State) 
                agree to operate, maintain, and manage the land at no 
                cost or expense to the United States and for fish and 
                wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes; and
                    (B) such other terms and conditions as the 
                Secretary determines to be in the interest of the 
                United States.
            (2) Reversion.--If the State (or a successor or assign of 
        the State) ceases to operate, maintain, and manage the land in 
        accordance with this subsection, all right, title, and interest 
        in and to the property shall revert to the United States, at 
        the option of the Secretary.

SEC. 3012. MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, ARKANSAS 
              AND OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Navigation Channel.--The Secretary shall continue construction 
of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, Arkansas and 
Oklahoma, to operate and maintain the navigation channel to the 
authorized depth of the channel, in accordance with section 136 of the 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2004 (Public Law 108-
137; 117 Stat. 1842).
    (b) Mitigation.--
            (1) In general.--As mitigation for any incidental taking 
        relating to the McClellan-Kerr Navigation System, the Secretary 
        shall determine the need for, and construct modifications in, 
        the structures and operations of the Arkansas River in the area 
        of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, including the construction of low 
        water dams and islands to provide nesting and foraging habitat 
        for the interior least tern, in accordance with the study 
        entitled ``Arkansas River Corridor Master Plan Planning 
        Assistance to States''.
            (2) Cost sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of a 
        project under this subsection shall be 35 percent.
            (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $12,000,000.

SEC. 3013. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Cache Creek Basin, 
California, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4112), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to mitigate the impacts of the new south levee of the Cache 
Creek settling basin on the storm drainage system of the city of 
Woodland, including all appurtenant features, erosion control measures, 
and environmental protection features.
    (b) Objectives.--Mitigation under subsection (a) shall restore the 
pre-project capacity of the city (1,360 cubic feet per second) to 
release water to the Yolo Bypass, including--
            (1) channel improvements;
            (2) an outlet work through the west levee of the Yolo 
        Bypass; and
            (3) a new low flow cross channel to handle city and county 
        storm drainage and settling basin flows (1,760 cubic feet per 
        second) when the Yolo Bypass is in a low flow condition.

SEC. 3014. CALFED LEVEE STABILITY PROGRAM, CALIFORNIA.

    In addition to funds made available pursuant to the Water Supply, 
Reliability, and Environmental Improvement Act (Public Law 108-361) to 
carry out section 103(f)(3)(D) of that Act (118 Stat. 1696), there is 
authorized to be appropriated to carry out projects described in that 
section $106,000,000, to remain available until expended.

SEC. 3015. HAMILTON AIRFIELD, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for environmental restoration, Hamilton Airfield, 
California, authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 279), is modified to include the 
diked bayland parcel known as ``Bel Marin Keys Unit V'' at an estimated 
total cost of $221,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$166,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $55,500,000, as part 
of the project to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in 
accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, recommended 
in the final report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 19, 2004.

SEC. 3016. LA-3 DREDGED MATERIAL OCEAN DISPOSAL SITE DESIGNATION, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    Section 102(c)(4) of the Marine Protection, Research, and 
Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1412(c)(4)) is amended in the third 
sentence by striking ``January 1, 2003'' and inserting ``January 1, 
2011''.

SEC. 3017. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Report.--The project for navigation, Larkspur Ferry Channel, 
Larkspur, California, authorized by section 601(d) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to prepare a limited reevaluation report to 
determine whether maintenance of the project is feasible.
    (b) Authorization of Project.--If the Secretary determines that 
maintenance of the project is feasible, the Secretary shall carry out 
the maintenance.

SEC. 3018. LLAGAS CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Llagas Creek, California, 
authorized by section 501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 333), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
complete the project, in accordance with the requirements of local 
cooperation as specified in section 5 of the Watershed Protection and 
Flood Prevention Act (16 U.S.C. 1005), at a total remaining cost of 
$105,000,000, with an estimated remaining Federal cost of $65,000,000 
and an estimated remaining non-Federal cost of $40,000,000.

SEC. 3019. MAGPIE CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for Magpie Creek, California, authorized by section 205 
of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to apply the cost-sharing requirements of section 
103(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4085) 
for the portion of the project consisting of land acquisition to 
preserve and enhance existing floodwater storage.

SEC. 3020. PETALUMA RIVER, PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Petaluma River, Petaluma, 
California, authorized by section 112 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2587), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of $41,500,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $26,975,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $14,525,000.

SEC. 3021. PINE FLAT DAM FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Cooperative Program.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall participate with 
        appropriate State and local agencies in the implementation of a 
        cooperative program to improve and manage fisheries and aquatic 
        habitat conditions in Pine Flat Reservoir and in the 14-mile 
        reach of the Kings River immediately below Pine Flat Dam, 
        California, in a manner that--
                    (A) provides for long-term aquatic resource 
                enhancement; and
                    (B) avoids adverse effects on water storage and 
                water rights holders.
            (2) Goals and principles.--The cooperative program 
        described in paragraph (1) shall be carried out--
                    (A) substantially in accordance with the goals and 
                principles of the document entitled ``Kings River 
                Fisheries Management Program Framework Agreement'' and 
                dated May 29, 1999, between the California Department 
                of Fish and Game and the Kings River Water Association 
                and the Kings River Conservation District; and
                    (B) in cooperation with the parties to that 
                agreement.
    (b) Participation by Secretary.--
            (1) In general.--In furtherance of the goals of the 
        agreement described in subsection (a)(2), the Secretary shall 
        participate in the planning, design, and construction of 
        projects and pilot projects on the Kings River and its 
        tributaries to enhance aquatic habitat and water availability 
        for fisheries purposes (including maintenance of a trout 
        fishery) in accordance with flood control operations, water 
        rights, and beneficial uses in existence as of the date of 
        enactment of this Act.
            (2) Projects.--Projects referred to in paragraph (1) may 
        include--
                    (A) projects to construct or improve pumping, 
                conveyance, and storage facilities to enhance water 
                transfers; and
                    (B) projects to carry out water exchanges and 
                create opportunities to use floodwater within and 
                downstream of Pine Flat Reservoir.
    (c) No Authorization of Certain Dam-Related Projects.--Nothing in 
this section authorizes any project for the raising of Pine Flat Dam or 
the construction of a multilevel intake structure at Pine Flat Dam.
    (d) Use of Existing Studies.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall use, to the maximum extent practicable, studies in 
existence on the date of enactment of this Act, including data and 
environmental documentation in the document entitled ``Final 
Feasibility Report and Report of the Chief of Engineers for Pine Flat 
Dam Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration'' and dated July 19, 2002.
    (e) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Project planning, design, and construction.--The 
        Federal share of the cost of planning, design, and construction 
        of a project under subsection (b) shall be 65 percent.
            (2) Non-federal share.--
                    (A) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-
                way.--The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal 
                share of the cost of construction of any project under 
                subsection (b) the value, regardless of the date of 
                acquisition, of any land, easements, rights-of-way, 
                dredged material disposal areas, or relocations 
                provided by the non-Federal interest for use in 
                carrying out the project.
                    (B) Form.--The non-Federal interest may provide not 
                more than 50 percent of the non-Federal share required 
                under this clause in the form of services, materials, 
                supplies, or other in-kind contributions.
    (f) Operation and Maintenance.--The operation, maintenance, repair, 
rehabilitation, and replacement of projects carried out under this 
section shall be a non-Federal responsibility.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 3022. REDWOOD CITY NAVIGATION PROJECT, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary may dredge the Redwood City Navigation Channel, 
California, on an annual basis, to maintain the authorized depth of -30 
mean lower low water.

SEC. 3023. SACRAMENTO AND AMERICAN RIVERS FLOOD CONTROL, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Credit for Non-Federal Work.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall provide credit to the 
        Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, in the amount of 
        $20,503,000, for the nonreimbursed Federal share of costs 
        incurred by the Agency in connection with the project for flood 
        control and recreation, Sacramento and American Rivers, 
        California (Natomas Levee features), authorized by section 9159 
        of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (106 
        Stat. 1944).
            (2) Allocation of credit.--The Secretary shall allocate the 
        amount to be credited under paragraph (1) toward the non-
        Federal share of such projects as are requested by the 
        Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency.
            (3) No reimbursement.--An amount credited under this 
        subsection shall not be available for reimbursement.
    (b) Project for Flood Control.--
            (1) In general.--The project for flood control, American 
        and Sacramento Rivers, California, authorized by section 
        101(a)(6)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
        (113 Stat. 274), as modified by section 128 of the Energy and 
        Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (119 Stat. 2259), is 
        further modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
        auxiliary spillway generally in accordance with the Post 
        Authorization Change Report, American River Watershed Project 
        (Folsom Dam Modification and Folsom Dam Raise Projects), dated 
        March 2007, at a total cost of $683,000,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $444,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $239,000,000.
            (2) Dam safety.--Nothing in this section limits the 
        authority of the Secretary of the Interior to carry out dam 
        safety activities in connection with the auxiliary spillway in 
        accordance with the Bureau of Reclamation Safety of Dams 
        Program.
            (3) Transfer of funds.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary and the Secretary of 
                the Interior are authorized to transfer between the 
                Department of the Army and the Department of the 
                Interior appropriated amounts and other available funds 
                (including funds contributed by non-Federal interests) 
                for the purpose of planning, design, and construction 
                of the auxiliary spillway.
                    (B) Terms and conditions.--Any transfer made 
                pursuant to this subsection shall be subject to such 
                terms and conditions as may be agreed on by the 
                Secretary and the Secretary of the Interior.

SEC. 3024. SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION PROJECT, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 202 of the River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 
(88 Stat. 49) is amended by striking ``and the monetary authorization'' 
and all that follows through the end of the section and inserting 
``except that the lineal feet in the second phase shall be increased 
from 405,000 lineal feet to 485,000 lineal feet.''.

SEC. 3025. CONDITIONAL DECLARATION OF NONNAVIGABILITY, PORT OF SAN 
              FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Conditional Declaration of Nonnavigability.--If the Secretary 
determines, in consultation with appropriate Federal and non-Federal 
entities, that projects proposed to be carried out by non-Federal 
entities within the portions of the San Francisco, California, 
waterfront described in subsection (b) are in the public interest, the 
portions shall be declared not to be navigable water of the United 
States for the purposes of section 9 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 
U.S.C. 401), and the General Bridge Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 525 et 
seq.).
    (b) Portions of Waterfront.--The portions of the San Francisco, 
California, waterfront referred to in subsection (a) are those that 
are, or will be, bulkheaded, filled, or otherwise occupied by permanent 
structures and that are located as follows: beginning at the 
intersection of the northeasterly prolongation of the portion of the 
northwesterly line of Bryant Street lying between Beale Street and Main 
Street with the southwesterly line of Spear Street, which intersection 
lies on the line of jurisdiction of the San Francisco Port Commission; 
following thence southerly along said line of jurisdiction as described 
in the State of California Harbor and Navigation Code Section 1770, as 
amended in 1961, to its intersection with the easterly line of Townsend 
Street along a line that is parallel and distant 10 feet from the 
existing southern boundary of Pier 40 to its point of intersection with 
the United States Government pier-head line; thence northerly along 
said pier-head line to its intersection with a line parallel with, and 
distant 10 feet easterly from, the existing easterly boundary line of 
Pier 30-32; thence northerly along said parallel line and its northerly 
prolongation, to a point of intersection with a line parallel with, and 
distant 10 feet northerly from, the existing northerly boundary of Pier 
30-32, thence westerly along last said parallel line to its 
intersection with the United States Government pier-head line; to the 
northwesterly line of Bryan Street northwesterly; thence southwesterly 
along said northwesterly line of Bryant Street to the point of 
beginning.
    (c) Requirement That Area Be Improved.--If, by the date that is 20 
years after the date of enactment of this Act, any portion of the San 
Francisco, California, waterfront described in subsection (b) has not 
been bulkheaded, filled, or otherwise occupied by 1 or more permanent 
structures, or if work in connection with any activity carried out 
pursuant to applicable Federal law requiring a permit, including 
sections 9 and 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401), is not 
commenced by the date that is 5 years after the date of issuance of 
such a permit, the declaration of nonnavigability for the portion under 
this section shall cease to be effective.

SEC. 3026. SALTON SEA RESTORATION, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Salton sea authority.--The term ``Salton Sea 
        Authority'' means the Joint Powers Authority established under 
        the laws of the State of California by a joint power agreement 
        signed on June 2, 1993.
            (2) Salton sea science office.--The term ``Salton Sea 
        Science Office'' means the Office established by the United 
        States Geological Survey and currently located in La Quinta, 
        California.
    (b) Pilot Projects.--
            (1) In general.--
                    (A) Review.--The Secretary shall review the 
                preferred restoration concept plan approved by the 
                Salton Sea Authority to determine whether the pilot 
                projects are economically justified, technically sound, 
                environmentally acceptable, and meet the objectives of 
                the Salton Sea Reclamation Act (Public Law 105-372).
                    (B) Implementation.--If the Secretary determines 
                that the pilot projects meet the requirements of 
                subparagraph (A), the Secretary may enter into an 
                agreement with the Salton Sea Authority and, in 
                consultation with the Salton Sea Science Office, carry 
                out pilot projects for improvement of the environment 
                in the area of the Salton Sea, except that the 
                Secretary shall be a party to each contract for 
                construction under this subsection.
            (2) Local participation.--In prioritizing pilot projects 
        under this section, the Secretary shall--
                    (A) consult with the Salton Sea Authority and the 
                Salton Sea Science Office; and
                    (B) consider the priorities of the Salton Sea 
                Authority.
            (3) Cost sharing.--Before carrying out a pilot project 
        under this section, the Secretary shall enter into a written 
        agreement with the Salton Sea Authority that requires the non-
        Federal interest to--
                    (A) pay 35 percent of the total costs of the pilot 
                project;
                    (B) provide any land, easements, rights-of-way, 
                relocations, and dredged material disposal areas 
                necessary to carry out the pilot project; and
                    (C) hold the United States harmless from any claim 
                or damage that may arise from carrying out the pilot 
                project, except any claim or damage that may arise from 
                the negligence of the Federal Government or a 
                contractor of the Federal Government.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out subsection (b) $30,000,000, of which not more 
than $5,000,000 may be used for any 1 pilot project under this section.

SEC. 3027. SANTA BARBARA STREAMS, LOWER MISSION CREEK, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Santa Barbara Streams, 
Lower Mission Creek, California, authorized by section 101(b)(8) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2577), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of 
$30,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $15,000,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $15,000,000.

SEC. 3028. UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Upper 
Guadalupe River, California, authorized by section 101(a)(9) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 275), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project generally in 
accordance with the Upper Guadalupe River Flood Damage Reduction, San 
Jose, California, Limited Reevaluation Report, dated March, 2004, at a 
total cost of $244,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$130,600,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $113,900,000.

SEC. 3029. YUBA RIVER BASIN PROJECT, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Yuba River Basin, 
California, authorized by section 101(a)(10) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 275), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of $107,700,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $70,000,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $37,700,000.

SEC. 3030. CHARLES HERVEY TOWNSHEND BREAKWATER, NEW HAVEN HARBOR, 
              CONNECTICUT.

    The western breakwater for the project for navigation, New Haven 
Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the first section of the Act of 
September 19, 1890 (26 Stat. 426), shall be known and designated as the 
``Charles Hervey Townshend Breakwater''.

SEC. 3031. ANCHORAGE AREA, NEW LONDON HARBOR, CONNECTICUT.

    (a) In General.--The portion of the project for navigation, New 
London Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the Act of June 13, 1902 (32 
Stat. 333), that consists of a 23-foot waterfront channel described in 
subsection (b), is deauthorized.
    (b) Description of Channel.--The channel referred to in subsection 
(a) may be described as beginning at a point along the western limit of 
the existing project, N. 188, 802.75, E. 779, 462.81, thence running 
northeasterly about 1,373.88 feet to a point N. 189, 554.87, E. 780, 
612.53, thence running southeasterly about 439.54 feet to a point N. 
189, 319.88, E. 780, 983.98, thence running southwesterly about 831.58 
feet to a point N. 188, 864.63, E. 780, 288.08, thence running 
southeasterly about 567.39 feet to a point N. 188, 301.88, E. 780, 
360.49, thence running northwesterly about 1,027.96 feet to the point 
of origin.

SEC. 3032. NORWALK HARBOR, CONNECTICUT.

    (a) In General.--The portions of a 10-foot channel of the project 
for navigation, Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the first 
section of the Act of March 2, 1919 (40 Stat. 1276) and described in 
subsection (b), are not authorized.
    (b) Description of Portions.--The portions of the channel referred 
to in subsection (a) are as follows:
            (1) Rectangular portion.--An approximately rectangular-
        shaped section along the northwesterly terminus of the channel. 
        The section is 35-feet wide and about 460-feet long and is 
        further described as commencing at a point N. 104,165.85, E. 
        417,662.71, thence running south 2406'55" E. 395.00 feet to a 
        point N. 103,805.32, E. 417,824.10, thence running south 
        0038'06" E. 87.84 feet to a point N. 103,717.49, E. 
        417,825.07, thence running north 2406'55" W. 480.00 feet, to a 
        point N. 104,155.59, E. 417.628.96, thence running north 
        7305'25" E. 35.28 feet to the point of origin.
            (2) Parallelogram-shaped portion.--An area having the 
        approximate shape of a parallelogram along the northeasterly 
        portion of the channel, southeast of the area described in 
        paragraph (1), approximately 20 feet wide and 260 feet long, 
        and further described as commencing at a point N. 103,855.48, 
        E. 417,849.99, thence running south 3307'30" E. 133.40 feet to 
        a point N. 103,743.76, E. 417,922.89, thence running south 
        2407'04" E. 127.75 feet to a point N. 103,627.16, E. 
        417,975.09, thence running north 3307'30" W. 190.00 feet to a 
        point N. 103,786.28, E. 417,871.26, thence running north 
        1705'15" W. 72.39 feet to the point of origin.
    (c) Modification.--The 10-foot channel portion of the Norwalk 
Harbor, Connecticut navigation project described in subsection (a) is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to realign the channel to include, 
immediately north of the area described in subsection (b)(2), a 
triangular section described as commencing at a point N. 103,968.35, E. 
417,815.29, thence running S. 1705'15" east 118.09 feet to a point N. 
103,855.48, E. 417,849.99, thence running N. 3307'30" west 36.76 feet 
to a point N. 103,886.27, E. 417,829.90, thence running N. 1005'26" 
west 83.37 feet to the point of origin.

SEC. 3033. ST. GEORGE'S BRIDGE, DELAWARE.

    Section 102(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 
Stat. 4612) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``The 
Secretary shall assume ownership responsibility for the replacement 
bridge not later than the date on which the construction of the bridge 
is completed and the contractors are released of their responsibility 
by the State. In addition, the Secretary may not carry out any action 
to close or remove the St. George's Bridge, Delaware, without specific 
congressional authorization.''.

SEC. 3034. ADDITIONAL PROGRAM AUTHORITY, COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES 
              RESTORATION, FLORIDA.

    Section 601(c)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2684) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) Maximum cost of program authority.--Section 
                902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
                U.S.C. 2280) shall apply to the individual project 
                funding limits in subparagraph (A) and the aggregate 
                cost limits in subparagraph (B).''.

SEC. 3035. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--The project for shoreline protection, Brevard 
County, Florida, authorized by section 418 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2637), is amended by striking ``7.1-
mile reach'' and inserting ``7.6-mile reach''.
    (b) References.--Any reference to a 7.1-mile reach with respect to 
the project described in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 
reference to a 7.6-mile reach with respect to that project.

SEC. 3036. CRITICAL RESTORATION PROJECTS, EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA 
              ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FLORIDA.

    Section 528(b)(3)(C) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3769) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``$75,000,000'' and all that 
        follows and inserting ``$95,000,000.''; and
            (2) by striking clause (ii) and inserting the following:
                            ``(ii) Federal share.--
                                    ``(I) In general.--Except as 
                                provided in subclause (II), the Federal 
                                share of the cost of carrying out a 
                                project under subparagraph (A) shall 
                                not exceed $25,000,000.
                                    ``(II) Seminole water conservation 
                                plan.--The Federal share of the cost of 
                                carrying out the Seminole Water 
                                Conservation Plan shall not exceed 
                                $30,000,000.''.

SEC. 3037. LAKE OKEECHOBEE AND HILLSBORO AQUIFER PILOT PROJECTS, 
              COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION, FLORIDA.

    Section 601(b)(2)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2681) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(v) Hillsboro and okeechobee aquifer, 
                        florida.--The pilot projects for aquifer 
                        storage and recovery, Hillsboro and Okeechobee 
                        Aquifer, Florida, authorized by section 
                        101(a)(16) of the Water Resources Development 
                        Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 276), shall be treated 
                        for the purposes of this section as being in 
                        the Plan and carried out in accordance with 
                        this section, except that costs of operation 
                        and maintenance of those projects shall remain 
                        100 percent non-Federal.''.

SEC. 3038. LIDO KEY, SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall carry out the project for hurricane and storm 
damage reduction in Lido Key, Sarasota County, Florida, based on the 
report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total 
cost of $14,809,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,088,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,721,000, and at an estimated total 
cost $63,606,000 for periodic beach nourishment over the 50-year life 
of the project, with an estimated Federal cost of $31,803,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $31,803,000.

SEC. 3039. PORT SUTTON CHANNEL, TAMPA HARBOR, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Port Sutton Channel, Tampa Harbor, 
Florida, authorized by section 101(b)(12) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2577), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to carry out the project at a total cost of $12,900,000.

SEC. 3040. TAMPA HARBOR, CUT B, TAMPA, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor, Florida, authorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1818), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct passing lanes in an 
area approximately 3.5 miles long and centered on Tampa Bay Cut B, if 
the Secretary determines that the improvements are necessary for 
navigation safety.

SEC. 3041. ALLATOONA LAKE, GEORGIA.

    (a) Land Exchange.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may exchange land above 863 
        feet in elevation at Allatoona Lake, Georgia, identified in the 
        Real Estate Design Memorandum prepared by the Mobile district 
        engineer, April 5, 1996, and approved October 8, 1996, for land 
        on the north side of Allatoona Lake that is required for 
        wildlife management and protection of the water quality and 
        overall environment of Allatoona Lake.
            (2) Terms and conditions.--The basis for all land exchanges 
        under this subsection shall be a fair market appraisal to 
        ensure that land exchanged is of equal value.
    (b) Disposal and Acquisition of Land, Allatoona Lake, Georgia.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may--
                    (A) sell land above 863 feet in elevation at 
                Allatoona Lake, Georgia, identified in the memorandum 
                referred to in subsection (a)(1); and
                    (B) use the proceeds of the sale, without further 
                appropriation, to pay costs associated with the 
                purchase of land required for wildlife management and 
                protection of the water quality and overall environment 
                of Allatoona Lake.
            (2) Terms and conditions.--
                    (A) Willing sellers.--Land acquired under this 
                subsection shall be by negotiated purchase from willing 
                sellers only.
                    (B) Basis.--The basis for all transactions under 
                this subsection shall be a fair market value appraisal 
                acceptable to the Secretary.
                    (C) Sharing of costs.--Each purchaser of land under 
                this subsection shall share in the associated 
                environmental and real estate costs of the purchase, 
                including surveys and associated fees in accordance 
                with the memorandum referred to in subsection (a)(1).
                    (D) Other conditions.--The Secretary may impose on 
                the sale and purchase of land under this subsection 
                such other conditions as the Secretary determines to be 
                appropriate.
    (c) Repeal.--Section 325 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4849) is repealed.

SEC. 3042. DWORSHAK RESERVOIR IMPROVEMENTS, IDAHO.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out additional general 
construction measures to allow for operation at lower pool levels to 
satisfy the recreation mission at Dworshak Dam, Idaho.
    (b) Improvements.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary 
shall provide for appropriate improvements to--
            (1) facilities that are operated by the Corps of Engineers; 
        and
            (2) facilities that, as of the date of enactment of this 
        Act, are leased, permitted, or licensed for use by others.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The Secretary shall carry out this section 
through a cost-sharing program with Idaho State Parks and Recreation 
Department, with a total estimated project cost of $5,300,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $3,900,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $1,400,000.

SEC. 3043. LITTLE WOOD RIVER, GOODING, IDAHO.

    The project for flood control, Gooding, Idaho, as constructed under 
the emergency conservation work program established under the Act of 
March 31, 1933 (16 U.S.C. 585 et seq.), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to rehabilitate the Gooding 
        Channel Project for the purposes of flood control and ecosystem 
        restoration, if the Secretary determines that the 
        rehabilitation and ecosystem restoration is feasible;
            (2) to authorize and direct the Secretary to plan, design, 
        and construct the project at a total cost of $9,000,000;
            (3) to authorize the non-Federal interest to provide any 
        portion of the non-Federal share of the cost of the project in 
        the form of services, materials, supplies, or other in-kind 
        contributions;
            (4) to authorize the non-Federal interest to use funds made 
        available under any other Federal program toward the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the project if the use of the 
        funds is permitted under the other Federal program; and
            (5) to direct the Secretary, in calculating the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project, to make a determination under 
        section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)) on the ability to pay of the non-Federal 
        interest.

SEC. 3044. PORT OF LEWISTON, IDAHO.

    (a) Extinguishment of Reversionary Interests and Use 
Restrictions.--With respect to property covered by each deed described 
in subsection (b)--
            (1) the reversionary interests and use restrictions 
        relating to port and industrial use purposes are extinguished;
            (2) the restriction that no activity shall be permitted 
        that will compete with services and facilities offered by 
        public marinas is extinguished;
            (3) the human habitation or other building structure use 
        restriction is extinguished in each area in which the elevation 
        is above the standard project flood elevation; and
            (4) the use of fill material to raise low areas above the 
        standard project flood elevation is authorized, except in any 
        low area constituting wetland for which a permit under section 
        404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) 
        is required.
    (b) Deeds.--The deeds referred to in subsection (a) are as follows:
            (1) Auditor's Instrument No. 399218 of Nez Perce County, 
        Idaho, 2.07 acres.
            (2) Auditor's Instrument No. 487437 of Nez Perce County, 
        Idaho, 7.32 acres.
    (c) No Effect on Other Rights.--Nothing in this section affects the 
remaining rights and interests of the Corps of Engineers for authorized 
project purposes with respect to property covered by deeds described in 
subsection (b).

SEC. 3045. CACHE RIVER LEVEE, ILLINOIS.

    The Cache River Levee created for flood control at the Cache River, 
Illinois, and authorized by the Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1215, 
chapter 795), is modified to add environmental restoration as a project 
purpose.

SEC. 3046. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    Section 425(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2638) is amended by inserting ``Lake Michigan and'' before ``the 
Chicago River''.

SEC. 3047. CHICAGO RIVER, ILLINOIS.

    The Federal navigation channel for the North Branch Channel portion 
of the Chicago River authorized by section 22 of the Act of March 3, 
1899 (30 Stat. 1156, chapter 425), extending from 100 feet downstream 
of the Halsted Street Bridge to 100 feet upstream of the Division 
Street Bridge, Chicago, Illinois, is redefined to be no wider than 66 
feet.

SEC. 3048. ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION.

    Section 519 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2654) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)(3), by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$20,000,000''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Cooperation.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary may 
enter into cooperative agreements, including with the State of 
Illinois, academic institutions, units of local governments, and soil 
and water conservation districts, to facilitate more efficient 
partnerships in developing and implementing the Illinois River Basin 
Restoration Program.''.

SEC. 3049. MISSOURI AND ILLINOIS FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS 
              RECONSTRUCTION PILOT PROGRAM.

    (a) Definition of Reconstruction.--In this section:
            (1) In general.--The term ``reconstruction'' means any 
        action taken to address 1 or more major deficiencies of a 
        project caused by long-term degradation of the foundation, 
        construction materials, or engineering systems or components of 
        the project, the results of which render the project at risk of 
        not performing in compliance with the authorized purposes of 
        the project.
            (2) Inclusions.--The term ``reconstruction'' includes the 
        incorporation by the Secretary of current design standards and 
        efficiency improvements in a project if the incorporation does 
        not significantly change the authorized scope, function, or 
        purpose of the project.
    (b) Participation by Secretary.--The Secretary may participate in 
the reconstruction of flood control projects within Missouri and 
Illinois as a pilot program if the Secretary determines that such 
reconstruction is not required as a result of improper operation and 
maintenance by the non-Federal interest.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) In general.--Costs for reconstruction of a project 
        under this section shall be shared by the Secretary and the 
        non-Federal interest in the same percentages as the costs of 
        construction of the original project were shared.
            (2) Operation, maintenance, and repair costs.--The costs of 
        operation, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation of a project 
        carried out under this section shall be a non-Federal 
        responsibility.
    (d) Critical Projects.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall give priority to the following projects:
            (1) Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, Illinois.
            (2) Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District, 
        Illinois.
            (3) Wood River Drainage and Levee District, Illinois.
            (4) City of St. Louis, Missouri.
            (5) Missouri River Levee Drainage District, Missouri.
    (e) Economic Justification.--Reconstruction efforts and activities 
carried out under this section shall not require economic 
justification.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $50,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 3050. SPUNKY BOTTOM, ILLINOIS.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Illinois and Des 
Plaines River Basin, between Beardstown, Illinois, and the mouth of the 
Illinois River, authorized by section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (49 
Stat. 1583, chapter 688), is modified to authorize ecosystem 
restoration as a project purpose.
    (b) Modifications.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), notwithstanding 
        the limitation on the expenditure of Federal funds to carry out 
        project modifications in accordance with section 1135 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), 
        modifications to the project referred to in subsection (a) 
        shall be carried out at Spunky Bottoms, Illinois, in accordance 
        with subsection (a).
            (2) Federal share.--Not more than $7,500,000 in Federal 
        funds may be expended under this section to carry out 
        modifications to the project referred to in subsection (a).
            (3) Post-construction monitoring and management.--Of the 
        Federal funds expended under paragraph (2), not less than 
        $500,000 shall remain available for a period of 5 years after 
        the date of completion of construction of the modifications for 
        use in carrying out post-construction monitoring and adaptive 
        management.
    (c) Emergency Repair Assistance.--Notwithstanding any modifications 
carried out under subsection (b), the project described in subsection 
(a) shall remain eligible for emergency repair assistance under section 
5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n), without consideration 
of economic justification.

SEC. 3051. STRAWN CEMETERY, JOHN REDMOND LAKE, KANSAS.

    (a) In General.--As soon as practicable after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary, acting through the Tulsa District of the 
Corps of Engineers, shall transfer to Pleasant Township, Coffey County, 
Kansas, for use as the New Strawn Cemetery, all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to the land described in 
subsection (c).
    (b) Reversion.--If the land transferred under this section ceases 
at any time to be used as a nonprofit cemetery or for another public 
purpose, the land shall revert to the United States.
    (c) Description.--The land to be conveyed under this section is a 
tract of land near John Redmond Lake, Kansas, containing approximately 
3 acres and lying adjacent to the west line of the Strawn Cemetery 
located in the SE corner of the NE\1/4\ of sec. 32, T. 20 S., R. 14 E., 
Coffey County, Kansas.
    (d) Consideration.--
            (1) In general.--The conveyance under this section shall be 
        at fair market value.
            (2) Costs.--All costs associated with the conveyance shall 
        be paid by Pleasant Township, Coffey County, Kansas.
    (e) Other Terms and Conditions.--The conveyance under this section 
shall be subject to such other terms and conditions as the Secretary 
considers necessary to protect the interests of the United States.

SEC. 3052. MILFORD LAKE, MILFORD, KANSAS.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary 
shall convey at fair market value by quitclaim deed to the Geary County 
Fire Department, Milford, Kansas, all right, title, and interest of the 
United States in and to a parcel of land consisting of approximately 
7.4 acres located in Geary County, Kansas, for construction, operation, 
and maintenance of a fire station.
    (b) Survey to Obtain Legal Description.--The exact acreage and the 
description of the real property referred to in subsection (a) shall be 
determined by a survey that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
    (c) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the property 
conveyed under subsection (a) ceases to be held in public ownership or 
to be used for any purpose other than a fire station, all right, title, 
and interest in and to the property shall revert to the United States, 
at the option of the United States.

SEC. 3053. OHIO RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

    The Secretary is authorized to conduct a comprehensive, basin-wide 
plan of the Ohio River Basin to identify the investments and 
reinvestments in system components that would be necessary and 
advisable--
            (1) to ensure protection of lives and property in the area 
        of the Basin; and
            (2) to sustain the purposes (including flood damage 
        reduction, ecosystem restoration and protection, water supply, 
        recreation, and related purposes) for which the Basin system 
        was developed.

SEC. 3054. HICKMAN BLUFF STABILIZATION, KENTUCKY.

    The project for Hickman Bluff, Kentucky, authorized by chapter II 
of title II of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations and 
Rescissions for the Department of Defense to Preserve and Enhance 
Military Readiness Act of 1995 (109 Stat. 85), is modified to authorize 
the Secretary to repair and restore the project, at full Federal 
expense, with no further economic studies or analyses, at a total cost 
of not more than $250,000.

SEC. 3055. MCALPINE LOCK AND DAM, KENTUCKY AND INDIANA.

    Section 101(a)(10) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(104 Stat. 4606) is amended by striking ``$219,600,000'' each place it 
appears and inserting ``$430,000,000''.

SEC. 3056. PUBLIC ACCESS, ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--The public access feature of the Atchafalaya Basin 
Floodway System, Louisiana project, authorized by section 601(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to acquire from willing sellers the fee 
interest (exclusive of oil, gas, and minerals) of an additional 20,000 
acres of land in the Lower Atchafalaya Basin Floodway for the public 
access feature of the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, Louisiana 
project.
    (b) Modification.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), effective 
        beginning November 17, 1986, the public access feature of the 
        Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, Louisiana project, is 
        modified to remove the $32,000,000 limitation on the maximum 
        Federal expenditure for the first costs of the public access 
        feature.
            (2) First cost.--The authorized first cost of $250,000,000 
        for the total project (as defined in section 601(a) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142)) shall 
        not be exceeded, except as authorized by section 902 of that 
        Act (100 Stat. 4183).
    (c) Technical Amendment.--Section 315(a)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2603) is amended by inserting before 
the period at the end the following: ``and may include Eagle Point 
Park, Jeanerette, Louisiana, as 1 of the alternative sites''.

SEC. 3057. REGIONAL VISITOR CENTER, ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, 
              LOUISIANA.

    (a) Project for Flood Control.--Notwithstanding paragraph (3) of 
the report of the Chief of Engineers dated February 28, 1983 (relating 
to recreational development in the Lower Atchafalaya Basin Floodway), 
the Secretary shall carry out the project for flood control, 
Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, Louisiana, authorized by chapter IV 
of title I of the Act of August 15, 1985 (Public Law 99-88; 99 Stat. 
313; 100 Stat. 4142).
    (b) Visitors Center.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, acting through the Chief of 
        Engineers and in consultation with the State of Louisiana, 
        shall study, design, and construct a type A regional visitors 
        center in the vicinity of Morgan City, Louisiana.
            (2) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The cost of construction of the 
                visitors center shall be shared in accordance with the 
                recreation cost-share requirement under section 103(c) 
                of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
                U.S.C. 2213(c)).
                    (B) Cost of upgrading.--The non-Federal share of 
                the cost of upgrading the visitors center from a type B 
                to type A regional visitors center shall be 100 
                percent.
            (3) Agreement.--The project under this subsection shall be 
        initiated only after the Secretary and the non-Federal 
        interests enter into a binding agreement under which the non-
        Federal interests shall--
                    (A) provide any land, easement, right-of-way, or 
                dredged material disposal area required for the project 
                that is owned, claimed, or controlled by--
                            (i) the State of Louisiana (including 
                        agencies and political subdivisions of the 
                        State); or
                            (ii) any other non-Federal government 
                        entity authorized under the laws of the State 
                        of Louisiana;
                    (B) pay 100 percent of the cost of the operation, 
                maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of 
                the project; and
                    (C) hold the United States free from liability for 
                the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, 
                replacement, and rehabilitation of the project, except 
                for damages due to the fault or negligence of the 
                United States or a contractor of the United States.
            (4) Donations.--In carrying out the project under this 
        subsection, the Mississippi River Commission may accept the 
        donation of cash or other funds, land, materials, and services 
        from any non-Federal government entity or nonprofit 
        corporation, as the Commission determines to be appropriate.

SEC. 3058. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LOUISIANA.

    The project for the Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana, authorized 
by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 481), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to provide $3,000,000 for each 
fiscal year, in a total amount of $15,000,000, for such rock bank 
protection of the Calcasieu River from mile 5 to mile 16 as the Chief 
of Engineers determines to be advisable to reduce maintenance dredging 
needs and facilitate protection of valuable disposal areas for the 
Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana.

SEC. 3059. EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LOUISIANA.

    The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, East Baton 
Rouge Parish, Louisiana, authorized by section 101(a)(21) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 277), as amended by 
section 116 of the Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, 2003 (117 
Stat. 140), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the 
project substantially in accordance with the Report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated December 23, 1996, and the subsequent Post 
Authorization Change Report dated December 2004, at a total cost of 
$178,000,000.

SEC. 3060. MISSISSIPPI RIVER GULF OUTLET RELOCATION ASSISTANCE, 
              LOUISIANA.

    (a) Port Facilities Relocation.--
            (1) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated $75,000,000, to remain available until 
        expended, to support the relocation of Port of New Orleans deep 
        draft facilities from the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet 
        (referred to in this section as the ``Outlet''), the Gulf 
        Intercoastal Waterway, and the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to 
        the Mississippi River.
            (2) Administration.--
                    (A) In general.--Amounts appropriated pursuant to 
                paragraph (1) shall be administered by the Assistant 
                Secretary for Economic Development (referred to in this 
                section as the ``Assistant Secretary'') pursuant to 
                sections 209(c)(2) and 703 of the Public Works and 
                Economic Development Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3149(c)(2), 
                3233).
                    (B) Requirement.--The Assistant Secretary shall 
                make amounts appropriated pursuant to paragraph (1) 
                available to the Port of New Orleans to relocate to the 
                Mississippi River within the State of Louisiana the 
                port-owned facilities that are occupied by businesses 
                in the vicinity that may be impacted due to the 
                treatment of the Outlet under the analysis and design 
                of comprehensive hurricane protection authorized by 
                title I of the Energy and Water Development 
                Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103; 119 Stat. 
                2247).
    (b) Revolving Loan Fund Grants.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Assistant Secretary $85,000,000, to remain 
available until expended, to provide assistance pursuant to sections 
209(c)(2) and 703 of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 
1965 (42 U.S.C. 3149(c)(2), 3233) to 1 or more eligible recipients to 
establish revolving loan funds to make loans for terms up to 20 years 
at or below market interest rates (including interest-free loans) to 
private businesses within the Port of New Orleans that may need to 
relocate to the Mississippi River within the State of Louisiana due to 
the treatment of the Outlet under the analysis and design of 
comprehensive hurricane protection authorized by title I of the Energy 
and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103; 119 
Stat. 2247).
    (c) Coordination With Secretary.--The Assistant Secretary shall 
ensure that the programs described in subsections (a) and (b) are fully 
coordinated with the Secretary to ensure that facilities are relocated 
in a manner that is consistent with the analysis and design of 
comprehensive hurricane protection authorized by title I of the Energy 
and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103; 119 
Stat. 2247).
    (d) Administrative Expenses.--The Assistant Secretary may use up to 
2 percent of the amounts made available under subsections (a) and (b) 
for administrative expenses.

SEC. 3061. RED RIVER (J. BENNETT JOHNSTON) WATERWAY, LOUISIANA.

    The project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses, Red River 
Waterway, Louisiana, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142) and modified by 
section 4(h) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 
4016), section 102(p) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(104 Stat. 4613), section 301(b)(7) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3710), and section 316 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2604), is further modified--
            (1) to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project at 
        a total cost of $33,200,000;
            (2) to permit the purchase of marginal farmland for 
        reforestation (in addition to the purchase of bottomland 
        hardwood); and
            (3) to incorporate wildlife and forestry management 
        practices to improve species diversity on mitigation land that 
        meets habitat goals and objectives of the Corps of Engineers 
        and the State of Louisiana.

SEC. 3062. CAMP ELLIS, SACO, MAINE.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project being carried out under section 111 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i) for the mitigation of shore damages 
attributable to the project for navigation, Camp Ellis, Saco, Maine, 
shall be $25,000,000.

SEC. 3063. ROCKLAND HARBOR, MAINE.

    As of the date of enactment of this Act, the portion of the project 
for navigation, Rockland Harbor, Maine, authorized by the Act of June 
3, 1896 (29 Stat. 202, chapter 314), consisting of a 14-foot channel 
located in Lermond Cove and beginning at a point with coordinates N. 
99977.37, E. 340290.02, thence running easterly about 200.00 feet to a 
point with coordinates N. 99978.49, E. 340490.02, thence running 
northerly about 138.00 feet to a point with coordinates N. 100116.49, 
E. 340289.25, thence running westerly about 200.00 feet to a point with 
coordinates N. 100115.37, E. 340289.25, thence running southerly about 
138.00 feet to the point of origin, is not authorized.

SEC. 3064. ROCKPORT HARBOR, MAINE.

    (a) In General.--The portion of the project for navigation, 
Rockport Harbor, Maine, authorized by the first section of the Act of 
August 11, 1888 (25 Stat. 400), located within the 12-foot anchorage 
described in subsection (b) is not authorized.
    (b) Description of Anchorage.--The anchorage referred to in 
subsection (a) is more particularly described as--
            (1) beginning at the westernmost point of the anchorage at 
        N. 128800.00, E. 349311.00;
            (2) thence running north 12 degrees, 52 minutes, 37.2 
        seconds, east 127.08 feet to a point at N. 128923.88, 
        E349339.32;
            (3) thence running north 17 degrees, 40 minutes, 13.0 
        seconds, east 338.61 feet to a point at N. 129246.51, E/ 
        349442.10;
            (4) thence running south 89 degrees, 21 minutes, 21.0 
        seconds, east 45.36 feet to a point at N. 129246.00, E. 
        349487.46;
            (5) thence running south 44 degrees, 13 minutes, 32.6 
        seconds, east 18.85 feet to a point at N. 129232.49, E. 
        349500.61;
            (6) thence running south 17 degrees, 40 minutes 13.0 
        seconds, west 340.50 feet to a point at N. 128908.06, E. 
        349397.25;
            (7) thence running south 12 degrees, 52 minutes, 37.2 
        seconds, west 235.41 feet to a point at N. 128678.57, E. 
        349344.79; and
            (8) thence running north 15 degrees, 32 minutes, 59.3 
        seconds, west 126.04 feet to the point of origin.

SEC. 3065. SACO RIVER, MAINE.

    The portion of the project for navigation, Saco River, Maine, 
authorized under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 
Stat. 486), and described as a 6-foot deep, 10-acre maneuvering basin 
located at the head of navigation, is redesignated as an anchorage 
area.

SEC. 3066. UNION RIVER, MAINE.

    The project for navigation, Union River, Maine, authorized by the 
first section of the Act of June 3, 1896 (29 Stat. 215, chapter 314), 
is modified by redesignating as an anchorage area that portion of the 
project consisting of a 6-foot turning basin and lying northerly of a 
line commencing at a point N. 315,975.13, E. 1,004,424.86, thence 
running N. 6127'20.71" W. about 132.34 feet to a point N. 316,038.37, 
E. 1,004,308.61.

SEC. 3067. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 1001(b)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)), the project 
for navigation, Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Maryland and Virginia, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 
1818), shall remain authorized to be carried out by the Secretary.
    (b) Limitation.--The project described in subsection (a) shall not 
be authorized for construction after the last day of the 5-year period 
beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, unless, during that 
period, funds have been obligated for the construction (including 
planning and design) of the project.

SEC. 3068. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION 
              PROGRAM, MARYLAND, PENNSYLVANIA, AND VIRGINIA.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 510 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3759) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``pilot'';
            (2) in subsection (d)(2), by adding at the end the 
        following:
                    ``(C) In-kind services.--The non-Federal share of 
                the project costs of a partnership agreement entered 
                into under this section may include in-kind 
                services.'';
            (3) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:
    ``(f) Projects.--The Secretary may carry out projects under this 
section in the States of Delaware, New York, Maryland, Pennsylvania, 
Virginia, and West Virginia, and the District of Columbia.''; and
            (4) in subsection (i), by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$30,000,000''.
    (b) Nonnative Oyster Species.--The matter under the heading 
``construction, general'' under the heading ``Corps of Engineers-
Civil'' under the heading ``Department of the Army'' of title I of the 
Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2004 (Public Law 108-
137; 117 Stat. 1828) is amended in the twenty-first proviso by striking 
``$2,000,000'' and inserting ``$3,500,000''.

SEC. 3069. FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT, CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND.

    Section 580(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 375) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$25,750,000'';
            (2) by striking ``$9,750,000'' and inserting 
        ``$16,378,000''; and
            (3) by striking ``$5,250,000'' and inserting 
        ``$9,012,000''.

SEC. 3070. AUNT LYDIA'S COVE, MASSACHUSETTS.

    (a) Deauthorization.--The portion of the project for navigation, 
Aunt Lydia's Cove, Massachusetts, authorized August 31, 1994, pursuant 
to section 107 of the Act of July 14, 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) (commonly 
known as the ``River and Harbor Act of 1960''), consisting of the 8-
foot deep anchorage in the cove described in subsection (b) is 
deauthorized.
    (b) Description.--The portion of the project described in 
subsection (a) is more particularly described as the portion beginning 
at a point along the southern limit of the existing project, N. 
254332.00, E. 1023103.96, thence running northwesterly about 761.60 
feet to a point along the western limit of the existing project N. 
255076.84, E. 1022945.07, thence running southwesterly about 38.11 feet 
to a point N. 255038.99, E. 1022940.60, thence running southeasterly 
about 267.07 feet to a point N. 254772.00, E. 1022947.00, thence 
running southeasterly about 462.41 feet to a point N. 254320.06, E. 
1023044.84, thence running northeasterly about 60.31 feet to the point 
of origin.

SEC. 3071. FALL RIVER HARBOR, MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 1001(b)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)), the project 
for navigation, Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 
731), shall remain authorized to be carried out by the Secretary, 
except that the authorized depth of that portion of the project 
extending riverward of the Charles M. Braga, Jr. Memorial Bridge, Fall 
River and Somerset, Massachusetts, shall not exceed 35 feet.
    (b) Feasibility.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of deepening that portion of the navigation channel of 
the navigation project for Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode 
Island, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 
(82 Stat. 731), seaward of the Charles M. Braga, Jr. Memorial Bridge 
Fall River and Somerset, Massachusetts.
    (c) Limitation.--The project described in subsection (a) shall not 
be authorized for construction after the last day of the 5-year period 
beginning on the date of enactment of this Act unless, during that 
period, funds have been obligated for construction (including planning 
and design) of the project.

SEC. 3072. NORTH RIVER, PEABODY, MASSACHUSETTS.

    The Secretary shall expedite completion of the report for the 
project North River, Peabody, Massachusetts, being carried out under 
section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).

SEC. 3073. ECORSE CREEK, MICHIGAN.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 1001(b)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)), the project 
for flood control, Ecorse Creek, Wayne County, Michigan, authorized by 
section 101(a)(14) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 
Stat. 4607) shall remain authorized to be carried out by the Secretary.
    (b) Limitation.--A project described in subsection (a) shall not be 
authorized for construction after the last day of the 5-year period 
beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, unless, during that 
period, funds have been obligated for the construction (including 
planning and design) of the project.

SEC. 3074. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.

    Section 426 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 326) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 426. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.

    ``(a) Definitions.--In this section:
            ``(1) Management plan.--The term `management plan' means 
        the management plan for the St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, 
        Michigan, that is in effect as of the date of enactment of this 
        section.
            ``(2) Partnership.--The term `Partnership' means the 
        partnership established by the Secretary under subsection 
        (b)(1).
    ``(b) Partnership.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish and lead a 
        partnership of appropriate Federal agencies (including the 
        Environmental Protection Agency) and the State of Michigan 
        (including political subdivisions of the State)--
                    ``(A) to promote cooperation among the Federal 
                Government, State and local governments, and other 
                involved parties in the management of the St. Clair 
                River and Lake St. Clair watersheds; and
                    ``(B) develop and implement projects consistent 
                with the management plan.
            ``(2) Coordination with actions under other law.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Actions taken under this section 
                by the Partnership shall be coordinated with actions to 
                restore and conserve the St. Clair River and Lake St. 
                Clair and watersheds taken under other provisions of 
                Federal and State law.
                    ``(B) No effect on other law.--Nothing in this 
                section alters, modifies, or affects any other 
                provision of Federal or State law.
    ``(c) Implementation of St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair 
Management Plan.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall--
                    ``(A) develop a St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair 
                strategic implementation plan in accordance with the 
                management plan;
                    ``(B) provide technical, planning, and engineering 
                assistance to non-Federal interests for developing and 
                implementing activities consistent with the management 
                plan;
                    ``(C) plan, design, and implement projects 
                consistent with the management plan; and
                    ``(D) provide, in coordination with the 
                Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, 
                financial and technical assistance, including grants, 
                to the State of Michigan (including political 
                subdivisions of the State) and interested nonprofit 
                entities for the planning, design, and implementation 
                of projects to restore, conserve, manage, and sustain 
                the St. Clair River, Lake St. Clair, and associated 
                watersheds.
            ``(2) Specific measures.--Financial and technical 
        assistance provided under subparagraphs (B) and (C) of 
        paragraph (1) may be used in support of non-Federal activities 
        consistent with the management plan.
    ``(d) Supplements to Management Plan and Strategic Implementation 
Plan.--In consultation with the Partnership and after providing an 
opportunity for public review and comment, the Secretary shall develop 
information to supplement--
            ``(1) the management plan; and
            ``(2) the strategic implementation plan developed under 
        subsection (c)(1)(A).
    ``(e) Cost Sharing.--
            ``(1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
        of technical assistance, or the cost of planning, design, 
        construction, and evaluation of a project under subsection (c), 
        and the cost of development of supplementary information under 
        subsection (d)--
                    ``(A) shall be 25 percent of the total cost of the 
                project or development; and
                    ``(B) may be provided through the provision of in-
                kind services.
            ``(2) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
        Secretary shall credit the non-Federal sponsor for the value of 
        any land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged material disposal 
        areas, or relocations provided for use in carrying out a 
        project under subsection (c).
            ``(3) Nonprofit entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of 
        the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a non-
        Federal sponsor for any project carried out under this section 
        may include a nonprofit entity.
            ``(4) Operation and maintenance.--The operation, 
        maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of 
        projects carried out under this section shall be non-Federal 
        responsibilities.
    ``(f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000.''.

SEC. 3075. DULUTH HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the cost limitation described in 
section 107(b) of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577(b)), 
the Secretary shall carry out the project for navigation, Duluth 
Harbor, Minnesota, pursuant to the authority provided under that 
section at a total Federal cost of $9,000,000.
    (b) Public Access and Recreational Facilities.--Section 321 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2605) is amended by 
inserting ``, and to provide public access and recreational 
facilities'' after ``including any required bridge construction''.

SEC. 3076. PROJECT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT, MISSISSIPPI AND 
              LOUISIANA ESTUARINE AREAS, MISSISSIPPI AND LOUISIANA.

    (a) Violet Diversion Project.--The Secretary shall redesign and 
implement the project for environmental enhancement, Mississippi and 
Louisiana Estuarine Areas, Mississippi and Louisiana, authorized by 
section 3(a)(8) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 
Stat. 4014), in lieu of diversion of freshwater at the Bonnet Carre 
Spillway using a diversion of water at or near Violet, Louisiana, if 
the following criteria can be met by the redesign:
            (1) Achieve the salinity targets to at least the same 
        extent as the diversion of freshwater at the Bonnet Carre 
        Spillway for the Mississippi Sound identified in the 
        feasibility study entitled ``Mississippi and Louisiana 
        Estuarine areas: Freshwater Diversion to Lake Pontchartrain 
        Basin and Mississippi Sound'' and dated 1984.
            (2) Not delay the completion of the design and construction 
        of the project beyond the dates identified in subsections (e) 
        and (f).
            (3) Not change the cost-share attributable to the Bonnet 
        Carre Freshwater Diversion Project.
    (b) Definition.--For the purposes of this section, the term 
``Bonnet Carre Freshwater Diversion Project'' is defined as the 
recommended alternative as described in the report of the Chief of 
Engineers for the project for environmental enhancement, Mississippi 
and Louisiana Estuarine Areas, Mississippi and Louisiana, May, 1986, 
and referenced in Public Law 104-303 and described in the Report to 
Congress on the Bonnet Carre Freshwater Diversion Project Status and 
Potential Options and Enhancement of December 1996.
    (c) Bonnet Carre Freshwater Diversion Project.--If the redesign in 
subsection (a) does not meet the criteria therein, the Secretary shall 
implement the Bonnet Carre Freshwater Diversion Project.
    (d) Non-Federal Financing Requirements.--
            (1) The States of Mississippi and Louisiana shall provide 
        the funds needed during any fiscal year for meeting each 
        State's respective non-Federal cost sharing requirements for 
        the project for environmental enhancement, Mississippi and 
        Louisiana Estuarine Areas, Mississippi and Louisiana, that 
        fiscal year by making deposits of the necessary funds into an 
        escrow account or into such other account as the Secretary 
        determines to be acceptable. Any deposits required pursuant to 
        this paragraph shall be made by the affected State within 30 
        days after receipt of notification from the Secretary that such 
        funds are due.
            (2) In the case of deposits required to be made by the 
        State of Louisiana, the Secretary may not award any new 
        contract or proceed to the next phase of any feature being 
        carried out in the State of Louisiana pursuant to section 1003 
        if the State of Louisiana is not in compliance with paragraph 
        (1).
            (3) In the case of deposits required to be made by the 
        State of Mississippi, the Secretary may not award any new 
        contract or proceed to the next phase of any feature being 
        carried out as a part of the project for environmental 
        enhancement, Mississippi and Louisiana Estuarine Areas, 
        Mississippi and Louisiana if the State of Mississippi is not in 
        compliance with paragraph (1).
            (4) The non-Federal share of project costs shall be 
        allocated between the States of Mississippi and Louisiana as 
        described in the Report to Congress on the Bonnet Carre 
        Freshwater Diversion Project Status and Potential Options and 
        Enhancement of December 1996.
            (5) The modification of the project for environmental 
        enhancement, Mississippi and Louisiana Estuarine Areas, 
        Mississippi and Louisiana, by this section shall not reduce the 
        percentage of the cost of the project that shall be paid by the 
        Federal government as it was determined upon enactment of 
        section 3(a)(8) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 
        (102 Stat. 4014).
    (e) Design Schedule.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to the availability of 
        appropriations, the Secretary shall complete the design of the 
        project for environmental enhancement, Mississippi and 
        Louisiana Estuarine Areas, Mississippi and Louisiana, not later 
        than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act.
            (2) Missed deadline.--If the Secretary does not complete 
        the design described in paragraph (1) by such date, the 
        Secretary shall assign such resources as available and 
        necessary to complete the design and the Secretary's authority 
        to expend funds for travel, official receptions, and official 
        representations is suspended until such design is complete.
    (f) Construction Schedule.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to the availability of 
        appropriations, the Secretary shall complete construction of 
        the project for environmental enhancement, Mississippi and 
        Louisiana Estuarine Areas, Mississippi and Louisiana, not later 
        than September 30, 2012.
            (2) Missed deadline.--If the Secretary does not complete 
        the construction described in paragraph (1) by such date, the 
        Secretary shall assign such resources as available and 
        necessary to complete the construction and the Secretary's 
        authority to expend funds for travel, official receptions, and 
        official representations is suspended until such construction 
        is complete.

SEC. 3077. LAND EXCHANGE, PIKE COUNTY, MISSOURI.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Federal land.--The term ``Federal land'' means the 2 
        parcels of Corps of Engineers land totaling approximately 42 
        acres, located on Buffalo Island in Pike County, Missouri, and 
        consisting of Government Tract Numbers MIS-7 and a portion of 
        FM-46.
            (2) Non-federal land.--The term ``non-Federal land'' means 
        the approximately 42 acres of land, subject to any existing 
        flowage easements situated in Pike County, Missouri, upstream 
        and northwest, about 200 feet from Drake Island (also known as 
        Grimes Island).
    (b) Land Exchange.--Subject to subsection (c), on conveyance by 
S.S.S., Inc., to the United States of all right, title, and interest in 
and to the non-Federal land, the Secretary shall convey to S.S.S., 
Inc., all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
Federal land.
    (c) Conditions.--
            (1) Deeds.--
                    (A) Non-federal land.--The conveyance of the non-
                Federal land to the Secretary shall be by a warranty 
                deed acceptable to the Secretary.
                    (B) Federal land.--The conveyance of the Federal 
                land to S.S.S., Inc., shall be--
                            (i) by quitclaim deed; and
                            (ii) subject to any reservations, terms, 
                        and conditions that the Secretary determines to 
                        be necessary to allow the United States to 
                        operate and maintain the Mississippi River 9-
                        Foot Navigation Project.
                    (C) Legal descriptions.--The Secretary shall, 
                subject to approval of S.S.S., Inc., provide a legal 
                description of the Federal land and non-Federal land 
                for inclusion in the deeds referred to in subparagraphs 
                (A) and (B).
            (2) Removal of improvements.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary may require the 
                removal of, or S.S.S., Inc., may voluntarily remove, 
                any improvements to the non-Federal land before the 
                completion of the exchange or as a condition of the 
                exchange.
                    (B) No liability.--If S.S.S., Inc., removes any 
                improvements to the non-Federal land under subparagraph 
                (A)--
                            (i) S.S.S., Inc., shall have no claim 
                        against the United States relating to the 
                        removal; and
                            (ii) the United States shall not incur or 
                        be liable for any cost associated with the 
                        removal or relocation of the improvements.
            (3) Administrative costs.--The Secretary shall require 
        S.S.S., Inc. to pay reasonable administrative costs associated 
        with the exchange.
            (4) Cash equalization payment.--If the appraised fair 
        market value, as determined by the Secretary, of the Federal 
        land exceeds the appraised fair market value, as determined by 
        the Secretary, of the non-Federal land, S.S.S., Inc., shall 
        make a cash equalization payment to the United States.
            (5) Deadline.--The land exchange under subsection (b) shall 
        be completed not later than 2 years after the date of enactment 
        of this Act.

SEC. 3078. L-15 LEVEE, MISSOURI.

    The portion of the L-15 levee system that is under the jurisdiction 
of the Consolidated North County Levee District and situated along the 
right descending bank of the Mississippi River from the confluence of 
that river with the Missouri River and running upstream approximately 
14 miles shall be considered to be a Federal levee for purposes of cost 
sharing under section 5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).

SEC. 3079. UNION LAKE, MISSOURI.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall offer to convey to the State 
of Missouri all right, title, and interest in and to approximately 
205.50 acres of land described in subsection (b) purchased for the 
Union Lake Project that was deauthorized as of January 1, 1990 (55 Fed. 
Reg. 40906), in accordance with section 1001 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(a)).
    (b) Land Description.--The land referred to in subsection (a) is 
described as follows:
            (1) Tract 500.--A tract of land situated in Franklin 
        County, Missouri, being part of the SW\1/4\ of sec. 7, and the 
        NW\1/4\ of the SW\1/4\ of sec. 8, T. 42 N., R. 2 W. of the 
        fifth principal meridian, consisting of approximately 112.50 
        acres.
            (2) Tract 605.--A tract of land situated in Franklin 
        County, Missouri, being part of the N\1/2\ of the NE, and part 
        of the SE of the NE of sec. 18, T. 42 N., R. 2 W. of the fifth 
        principal meridian, consisting of approximately 93.00 acres.
    (c) Conveyance.--On acceptance by the State of Missouri of the 
offer by the Secretary under subsection (a), the land described in 
subsection (b) shall immediately be conveyed, in its current condition, 
by Secretary to the State of Missouri.

SEC. 3080. LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT, MONTANA.

    The Secretary may use funds appropriated to carry out the Missouri 
River recovery and mitigation program to assist the Bureau of 
Reclamation in the design and construction of the Lower Yellowstone 
project of the Bureau, Intake, Montana, for the purpose of ecosystem 
restoration.

SEC. 3081. YELLOWSTONE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MONTANA AND NORTH DAKOTA.

    (a) Definition of Restoration Project.--In this section, the term 
``restoration project'' means a project that will produce, in 
accordance with other Federal programs, projects, and activities, 
substantial ecosystem restoration and related benefits, as determined 
by the Secretary.
    (b) Projects.--The Secretary shall carry out, in accordance with 
other Federal programs, projects, and activities, restoration projects 
in the watershed of the Yellowstone River and tributaries in Montana, 
and in North Dakota, to produce immediate and substantial ecosystem 
restoration and recreation benefits.
    (c) Local Participation.--In carrying out subsection (b), the 
Secretary shall--
            (1) consult with, and consider the activities being carried 
        out by--
                    (A) other Federal agencies;
                    (B) Indian tribes;
                    (C) conservation districts; and
                    (D) the Yellowstone River Conservation District 
                Council; and
            (2) seek the full participation of the State of Montana.
    (d) Cost Sharing.--Before carrying out any restoration project 
under this section, the Secretary shall enter into an agreement with 
the non-Federal interest for the restoration project under which the 
non-Federal interest shall agree--
            (1) to provide 35 percent of the total cost of the 
        restoration project, including necessary land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, relocations, and disposal sites;
            (2) to pay the non-Federal share of the cost of feasibility 
        studies and design during construction following execution of a 
        project cooperation agreement;
            (3) to pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, 
        repair, replacement, and rehabilitation costs incurred after 
        the date of enactment of this Act that are associated with the 
        restoration project; and
            (4) to hold the United States harmless for any claim of 
        damage that arises from the negligence of the Federal 
        Government or a contractor of the Federal Government in 
        carrying out the restoration project.
    (e) Form of Non-Federal Share.--Not more than 50 percent of the 
non-Federal share of the cost of a restoration project carried out 
under this section may be provided in the form of in-kind credit for 
work performed during construction of the restoration project.
    (f) Non-Federal Interests.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), with the consent of the 
applicable local government, a nonprofit entity may be a non-Federal 
interest for a restoration project carried out under this section.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000.

SEC. 3082. WESTERN SARPY AND CLEAR CREEK, NEBRASKA.

    The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage reduction, 
Western Sarpy and Clear Creek, Nebraska, authorized by section 
101(b)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 
2578), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
at a total cost of $21,664,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$14,082,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,582,000.

SEC. 3083. LOWER TRUCKEE RIVER, MCCARRAN RANCH, NEVADA.

    The maximum amount of Federal funds that may be expended for the 
project being carried out, as of the date of enactment of this Act, 
under section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2309a) for environmental restoration of McCarran Ranch, Nevada, 
shall be $5,775,000.

SEC. 3084. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS, NEW MEXICO.

    The Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements with any Indian 
tribe any land of which is located in the State of New Mexico and 
occupied by a flood control project that is owned and operated by the 
Corps of Engineers to assist in carrying out any operation or 
maintenance activity associated with the flood control project.

SEC. 3085. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE RESTORATION, NEW MEXICO.

    (a) Restoration Projects.--
            (1) Definition.--The term ``restoration project'' means a 
        project that will produce, consistent with other Federal 
        programs, projects, and activities, immediate and substantial 
        ecosystem restoration and recreation benefits.
            (2) Projects.--The Secretary shall carry out restoration 
        projects in the Middle Rio Grande from Cochiti Dam to the 
        headwaters of Elephant Butte Reservoir, in the State of New 
        Mexico.
    (b) Project Selection.--The Secretary shall select restoration 
projects in the Middle Rio Grande.
    (c) Local Participation.--In carrying out subsection (b), the 
Secretary shall consult with, and consider the activities being carried 
out by--
            (1) the Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Act 
        Collaborative Program; and
            (2) the Bosque Improvement Group of the Middle Rio Grande 
        Bosque Initiative.
    (d) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Projects on federal land.--Each restoration project 
        under this section located on Federal land shall be carried out 
        at full Federal expense.
            (2) Other projects.--For any restoration project located on 
        non-Federal land, before carrying out the restoration project 
        under this section, the Secretary shall enter into an agreement 
        with non-Federal interests that requires the non-Federal 
        interests to--
                    (A) provide 35 percent of the total cost of the 
                restoration projects including provisions for necessary 
                lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and 
                disposal sites;
                    (B) pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, 
                repair, replacement, and rehabilitation costs incurred 
                after the date of the enactment of this Act that are 
                associated with the restoration projects; and
                    (C) hold the United States harmless for any claim 
                of damage that arises from the negligence of the 
                Federal Government or a contractor of the Federal 
                Government.
    (e) Non-Federal Interests.--Not withstanding section 221 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a non-Federal interest 
for any project carried out under this section may include a nonprofit 
entity, with the consent of the local government.
    (f) Recreational Features.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), any recreational 
        feature included as part of a restoration project shall 
        comprise not more than 30 percent of the cost of the 
        restoration project.
            (2) Requirement.--The cost of any recreational feature 
        included as part of a restoration project in excess of the 
        amount described in paragraph (1) shall be paid by the non-
        Federal interest.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 3086. LONG ISLAND SOUND OYSTER RESTORATION, NEW YORK AND 
              CONNECTICUT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall plan, design, and construct 
projects to increase aquatic habitats within Long Island Sound and 
adjacent waters, including the construction and restoration of oyster 
beds and related shellfish habitat.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of activities 
carried out under this section shall be 25 percent and may be provided 
through in-kind services and materials.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 3087. MAMARONECK AND SHELDRAKE RIVERS WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, NEW 
              YORK.

    (a) Watershed Management Plan Development.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        State of New York and local entities, shall develop watershed 
        management plans for the Mamaroneck and Sheldrake River 
        watershed for the purposes of evaluating existing and new flood 
        damage reduction and ecosystem restoration.
            (2) Existing plans.--In developing the watershed management 
        plans, the Secretary shall use existing studies and plans, as 
        appropriate.
    (b) Critical Restoration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in any 
        eligible critical restoration project in the Mamaroneck and 
        Sheldrake Rivers watershed in accordance with the watershed 
        management plan developed under subsection (a).
            (2) Eligible projects.--A critical restoration project 
        shall be eligible for assistance under this section if the 
        project--
                    (A) meets the purposes described in the watershed 
                management plan developed under subsection (a); and
                    (B) with respect to the Mamaroneck and Sheldrake 
                Rivers watershed in New York, consists of flood damage 
                reduction or ecosystem restoration--
                            (i) bank stabilization of the mainstem, 
                        tributaries, and streams;
                            (ii) wetland restoration;
                            (iii) soil and water conservation;
                            (iv) restoration of natural flows;
                            (v) restoration of stream stability;
                            (vi) structural and nonstructural flood 
                        damage reduction measures; or
                            (vii) any other project or activity the 
                        Secretary determines to be appropriate.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of implementing 
any project carried out under this section shall be 65 percent.
    (d) Non-Federal Interest.--A nonprofit organization may serve as 
the non-Federal interest for a project carried out under this section.
    (e) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary may enter into 1 or more cooperative agreements to provide 
financial assistance to appropriate Federal, State, or local 
governments or nonprofit agencies, including assistance for the 
implementation of projects to be carried out under subsection (b).
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 3088. ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NEW YORK.

    Section 554 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3781) is amended by striking ``$5,200,000'' and inserting 
``$18,200,000''.

SEC. 3089. NEW YORK HARBOR, NEW YORK, NEW YORK.

    Section 217 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2326a) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d);
            (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Dredged Material Facility.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may enter into cost-
        sharing agreements with 1 or more non-Federal public interests 
        with respect to a project, or group of projects within a 
        geographic region, if appropriate, for the acquisition, design, 
        construction, management, or operation of a dredged material 
        processing, treatment, contaminant reduction, or disposal 
        facility (including any facility used to demonstrate potential 
        beneficial uses of dredged material, which may include 
        effective sediment contaminant reduction technologies) using 
        funds provided in whole or in part by the Federal Government.
            ``(2) Performance.--One or more of the parties to the 
        agreement may perform the acquisition, design, construction, 
        management, or operation of a dredged material processing, 
        treatment, contaminant reduction, or disposal facility.
            ``(3) Multiple federal projects.--If appropriate, the 
        Secretary may combine portions of separate Federal projects 
        with appropriate combined cost-sharing between the various 
        projects, if the facility serves to manage dredged material 
        from multiple Federal projects located in the geographic region 
        of the facility.
            ``(4) Public financing.--
                    ``(A) Agreements.--
                            ``(i) Specified federal funding sources and 
                        cost sharing.--The cost-sharing agreement used 
                        shall clearly specify--
                                    ``(I) the Federal funding sources 
                                and combined cost-sharing when 
                                applicable to multiple Federal 
                                navigation projects; and
                                    ``(II) the responsibilities and 
                                risks of each of the parties related to 
                                present and future dredged material 
                                managed by the facility.
                            ``(ii) Management of sediments.--
                                    ``(I) In general.--The cost-sharing 
                                agreement may include the management of 
                                sediments from the maintenance dredging 
                                of Federal navigation projects that do 
                                not have partnerships agreements.
                                    ``(II) Payments.--The cost-sharing 
                                agreement may allow the non-Federal 
                                interest to receive reimbursable 
                                payments from the Federal Government 
                                for commitments made by the non-Federal 
                                interest for disposal or placement 
                                capacity at dredged material treatment, 
                                processing, contaminant reduction, or 
                                disposal facilities.
                            ``(iii) Credit.--The cost-sharing agreement 
                        may allow costs incurred prior to execution of 
                        a partnership agreement for construction or the 
                        purchase of equipment or capacity for the 
                        project to be credited according to existing 
                        cost-sharing rules.
                    ``(B) Credit.--
                            ``(i) Effect on existing agreements.--
                        Nothing in this subsection supersedes or 
                        modifies an agreement in effect on the date of 
                        enactment of this paragraph between the Federal 
                        Government and any other non-Federal interest 
                        for the cost-sharing, construction, and 
                        operation and maintenance of a Federal 
                        navigation project.
                            ``(ii) Credit for funds.--Subject to the 
                        approval of the Secretary and in accordance 
                        with law (including regulations and policies) 
                        in effect on the date of enactment of this 
                        paragraph, a non-Federal public interest of a 
                        Federal navigation project may seek credit for 
                        funds provided for the acquisition, design, 
                        construction, management, or operation of a 
                        dredged material processing, treatment, or 
                        disposal facility to the extent the facility is 
                        used to manage dredged material from the 
                        Federal navigation project.
                            ``(iii) Non-federal interest 
                        responsibilities.--The non-Federal interest 
                        shall--
                                    ``(I) be responsible for providing 
                                all necessary land, easement rights-of-
                                way, or relocations associated with the 
                                facility; and
                                    ``(II) receive credit for those 
                                items.''; and
            (3) in paragraphs (1) and (2)(A) of subsection (d) (as 
        redesignated by paragraph (1))--
                    (A) by inserting ``and maintenance'' after 
                ``operation'' each place it appears; and
                    (B) by inserting ``processing, treatment, or'' 
                after ``dredged material'' the first place it appears 
                in each of those paragraphs.

SEC. 3090. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.

    Section 553 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3781) is amended by striking subsection (c) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(c) Definition of New York State Canal System.--In this section, 
the term `New York State Canal System' means the 524 miles of navigable 
canal that comprise the New York State Canal System, including the 
Erie, Cayuga-Seneca, Oswego, and Champlain Canals and the historic 
alignments of these canals, including the cities of Albany, Rochester, 
and Buffalo.''.

SEC. 3091. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER AND UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED 
              MANAGEMENT, NEW YORK.

    (a) Watershed Management Plan Development.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        State of New York, the Delaware or Susquehanna River Basin 
        Commission, as appropriate, and local entities, shall develop 
        watershed management plans for the Susquehanna River watershed 
        in New York State and the Upper Delaware River watershed for 
        the purposes of evaluating existing and new flood damage 
        reduction and ecosystem restoration.
            (2) Existing plans.--In developing the watershed management 
        plans, the Secretary shall use existing studies and plans, as 
        appropriate.
    (b) Critical Restoration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in any 
        eligible critical restoration project in the Susquehanna River 
        or Upper Delaware Rivers in accordance with the watershed 
        management plan developed under subsection (a).
            (2) Eligible projects.--A critical restoration project 
        shall be eligible for assistance under this section if the 
        project--
                    (A) meets the purposes described in the watershed 
                management plan developed under subsection (a); and
                    (B) with respect to the Susquehanna River or Upper 
                Delaware River watershed in New York, consists of flood 
                damage reduction or ecosystem restoration through--
                            (i) bank stabilization of the mainstem, 
                        tributaries, and streams;
                            (ii) wetland restoration;
                            (iii) soil and water conservation;
                            (iv) restoration of natural flows;
                            (v) restoration of stream stability;
                            (vi) structural and nonstructural flood 
                        damage reduction measures; or
                            (vii) any other project or activity the 
                        Secretary determines to be appropriate.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of implementing 
any project carried out under this section shall be 65 percent.
    (d) Non-Federal Interest.--A nonprofit organization may serve as 
the non-Federal interest for a project carried out under this section.
    (e) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary may enter into 1 or more cooperative agreements to provide 
financial assistance to appropriate Federal, State, or local 
governments or nonprofit agencies, including assistance for the 
implementation of projects to be carried out under subsection (b).
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 3092. MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, NORTH DAKOTA.

    Section 707(a) of the Water Resources Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2699) 
is amended in the first sentence by striking ``$5,000,000'' and all 
that follows through ``2005'' and inserting ``$25,000,000''.

SEC. 3093. OHIO.

    Section 594 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 381) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any project carried out 
under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit 
entity, with the consent of the affected local government.''.

SEC. 3094. LOWER GIRARD LAKE DAM, GIRARD, OHIO.

    Section 507(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3758) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$2,500,000'' and inserting 
        ``$16,000,000''; and
            (2) by striking ``Repair and rehabilitation'' and inserting 
        ``Correct structural deficiencies''.

SEC. 3095. TOUSSAINT RIVER NAVIGATION PROJECT, CARROLL TOWNSHIP, OHIO.

    Increased operation and maintenance activities for the Toussaint 
River Federal Navigation Project, Carroll Township, Ohio, that are 
carried out in accordance with section 107 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) and relate directly to the presence of 
unexploded ordnance, shall be carried out at full Federal expense.

SEC. 3096. ARCADIA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

    Payments made by the city of Edmond, Oklahoma, to the Secretary in 
October 1999 of all costs associated with present and future water 
storage costs at Arcadia Lake, Oklahoma, under Arcadia Lake Water 
Storage Contract Number DACW56-79-C-0072 shall satisfy the obligations 
of the city under that contract.

SEC. 3097. LAKE EUFAULA, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Project Goal.--
            (1) In general.--The goal for operation of Lake Eufaula 
        shall be to maximize the use of available storage in a balanced 
        approach that incorporates advice from representatives from all 
        the project purposes to ensure that the full value of the 
        reservoir is realized by the United States.
            (2) Recognition of purpose.--To achieve the goal described 
        in paragraph (1), recreation is recognized as a project purpose 
        at Lake Eufaula, pursuant to the Act of December 22, 1944 
        (commonly known as the ``Flood Control Act of 1944'') (58 Stat. 
        887, chapter 665).
    (b) Lake Eufaula Advisory Committee.--
            (1) In general.--In accordance with the Federal Advisory 
        Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), the Secretary shall establish an 
        advisory committee for the Lake Eufaula, Canadian River, 
        Oklahoma project authorized by the Act of July 24, 1946 
        (commonly known as the ``River and Harbor Act of 1946'') 
        (Public Law 79-525; 60 Stat. 634).
            (2) Purpose.--The purpose of the committee shall be 
        advisory only.
            (3) Duties.--The committee shall provide information and 
        recommendations to the Corps of Engineers regarding the 
        operations of Lake Eufaula for the project purposes for Lake 
        Eufaula.
            (4) Composition.--The Committee shall be composed of 
        members that equally represent the project purposes for Lake 
        Eufaula.
    (c) Reallocation Study.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to the appropriation of funds, the 
        Secretary, acting through the Chief of Engineers, shall perform 
        a reallocation study, at full Federal expense, to develop and 
        present recommendations concerning the best value, while 
        minimizing ecological damages, for current and future use of 
        the Lake Eufaula storage capacity for the authorized project 
        purposes of flood control, water supply, hydroelectric power, 
        navigation, fish and wildlife, and recreation.
            (2) Factors for consideration.--The reallocation study 
        shall take into consideration the recommendations of the Lake 
        Eufaula Advisory Committee.
    (d) Pool Management Plan.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 360 days after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, to the extent feasible within available 
        project funds and subject to the completion and approval of the 
        reallocation study under subsection (c), the Tulsa District 
        Engineer, taking into consideration recommendations of the Lake 
        Eufaula Advisory Committee, shall develop an interim management 
        plan that accommodates all project purposes for Lake Eufaula.
            (2) Modifications.--A modification of the plan under 
        paragraph (1) shall not cause significant adverse impacts on 
        any existing permit, lease, license, contract, public law, or 
        project purpose, including flood control operation, relating to 
        Lake Eufaula.

SEC. 3098. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Release.--Any reversionary interest relating to public parks 
and recreation on the land conveyed by the Secretary to the State of 
Oklahoma at Lake Texoma pursuant to the Act entitled ``An Act to 
authorize the sale of certain lands to the State of Oklahoma'' (67 
Stat. 63, chapter 118), shall terminate on the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (b) Instrument of Release.--As soon as practicable after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall execute and file in the 
appropriate office a deed of release, an amended deed, or another 
appropriate instrument to release each reversionary interest described 
in subsection (a).
    (c) Preservation of Reserved Rights.--A release of a reversionary 
interest under this section shall not affect any other right of the 
United States in any deed of conveyance pursuant to the Act entitled 
``An Act to authorize the sale of certain lands to the State of 
Oklahoma'' (67 Stat. 63, chapter 118).

SEC. 3099. OKLAHOMA LAKES DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Implementation of Program.--Not later than 1 year after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall implement an 
innovative program at the lakes located primarily in the State of 
Oklahoma that are a part of an authorized civil works project under the 
administrative jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers for the purpose 
of demonstrating the benefits of enhanced recreation facilities and 
activities at those lakes.
    (b) Requirements.--In implementing the program under subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall, consistent with authorized project purposes--
            (1) pursue strategies that will enhance, to the maximum 
        extent practicable, recreation experiences at the lakes 
        included in the program;
            (2) use creative management strategies that optimize 
        recreational activities; and
            (3) ensure continued public access to recreation areas 
        located on or associated with the civil works project.
    (c) Guidelines.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidelines for the 
implementation of this section, to be developed in coordination with 
the State of Oklahoma.
    (d) Report.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives a report describing the results of the program 
        under subsection (a).
            (2) Inclusions.--The report under paragraph (1) shall 
        include a description of the projects undertaken under the 
        program, including--
                    (A) an estimate of the change in any related 
                recreational opportunities;
                    (B) a description of any leases entered into, 
                including the parties involved; and
                    (C) the financial conditions that the Corps of 
                Engineers used to justify those leases.
            (3) Availability to public.--The Secretary shall make the 
        report available to the public in electronic and written 
        formats.
    (e) Termination.--The authority provided by this section shall 
terminate on the date that is 10 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.

SEC. 3100. OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated $30,000,000 
for the purposes set forth in subsection (b).
    (b) Purposes.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, funds 
appropriated under subsection (a) may be used for the purpose of--
            (1) the buy-out of properties and permanently relocating 
        residents and businesses in or near Picher, Cardin, and 
        Hockerville, Oklahoma, from areas determined by the State of 
        Oklahoma to be at risk of damage caused by land subsidence and 
        remaining properties; and
            (2) providing funding to the State of Oklahoma to buyout 
        properties and permanently relocate residents and businesses of 
        Picher, Cardin, and Hockerville, Oklahoma, from areas 
        determined by the State of Oklahoma to be at risk of damage 
        caused by land subsidence and remaining properties.
    (c) Limitation.--The use of funds in accordance with subsection (b) 
shall not be considered to be part of a Federally assisted program or 
project for purposes of Public Law 91-646 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.), 
consistent with section 2301 of Public Law 109-234 (120 Stat. 455-456).
    (d) Consistency With State Program.--Any actions taken under 
subsection (b) shall be consistent with the relocation program in the 
State of Oklahoma under 27A O.S. Supp. 2006, sections 2201 et seq.
    (e) Amendment.--Section 111 of Public Law 108-137 (117 Stat. 1835) 
is amended--
            (1) by adding the following language at the end of 
        subsection (a): ``Such activities also may include the 
        provision of financial assistance to facilitate the buy out of 
        properties located in areas identified by the State as areas 
        that are or will be at risk of damage caused by land subsidence 
        and associated properties otherwise identified by the State; 
        however, any buyout of such properties shall not be considered 
        to be part of a Federally assisted program or project for 
        purposes of Public Law 91-646 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.), 
        consistent with section 2301 of Public Law 109-234 (120 Stat. 
        455-456).''; and
            (2) by striking the first sentence of subsection (d) and 
        inserting the following: ``Non-Federal interests shall be 
        responsible for operating and maintaining any restoration 
        alternatives constructed or carried out pursuant to this 
        section.''.

SEC. 3101. RED RIVER CHLORIDE CONTROL, OKLAHOMA AND TEXAS.

    Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1420; 100 
Stat. 4229) is further modified to direct the Secretary to provide 
operation and maintenance for the Red River Chloride Control project, 
Oklahoma and Texas, at full Federal expense.

SEC. 3102. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

    The remaining obligation of the Waurika Project Master Conservancy 
District payable to the United States Government in the amounts, rates 
of interest, and payment schedules--
            (1) is set at the amounts, rates of interest, and payment 
        schedules that existed on June 3, 1986; and
            (2) may not be adjusted, altered, or changed without a 
        specific, separate, and written agreement between the District 
        and the United States.

SEC. 3103. LOOKOUT POINT PROJECT, LOWELL, OREGON.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (c), the Secretary shall 
convey at fair market value to the Lowell School District No. 71, all 
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel 
consisting of approximately 0.98 acres of land, including 3 abandoned 
buildings on the land, located in Lowell, Oregon, as described in 
subsection (b).
    (b) Description of Property.--The parcel of land to be conveyed 
under subsection (a) is more particularly described as follows: 
Commencing at the point of intersection of the west line of Pioneer 
Street with the westerly extension of the north line of Summit Street, 
in Meadows Addition to Lowell, as platted and recorded on page 56 of 
volume 4, Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence north on the west 
line of Pioneer Street a distance of 176.0 feet to the true point of 
beginning of this description; thence north on the west line of Pioneer 
Street a distance of 170.0 feet; thence west at right angles to the 
west line of Pioneer Street a distance of 250.0 feet; thence south and 
parallel to the west line of Pioneer Street a distance of 170.0 feet; 
and thence east 250.0 feet to the true point of beginning of this 
description in sec. 14, T. 19 S., R. 1 W. of the Willamette Meridian, 
Lane County, Oregon.
    (c) Condition.--The Secretary shall not complete the conveyance 
under subsection (a) until such time as the Forest Service--
            (1) completes and certifies that necessary environmental 
        remediation associated with the structures located on the 
        property is complete; and
            (2) transfers the structures to the Corps of Engineers.
    (d) Effect of Other Law.--
            (1) Applicability of property screening provisions.--
        Section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply 
        to any conveyance under this section.
            (2) Liability.--
                    (A) In general.--Lowell School District No. 71 
                shall hold the United States harmless from any 
                liability with respect to activities carried out on the 
                property described in subsection (b) on or after the 
                date of the conveyance under subsection (a).
                    (B) Certain activities.--The United States shall be 
                liable with respect to any activity carried out on the 
                property described in subsection (b) before the date of 
                conveyance under subsection (a).

SEC. 3104. UPPER WILLAMETTE RIVER WATERSHED ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct studies and ecosystem 
restoration projects for the upper Willamette River watershed from 
Albany, Oregon, to the headwaters of the Willamette River and 
tributaries.
    (b) Consultation.--The Secretary shall carry out ecosystem 
restoration projects under this section for the Upper Willamette River 
watershed in consultation with the Governor of the State of Oregon, the 
heads of appropriate Indian tribes, the Environmental Protection 
Agency, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the National 
Marine Fisheries Service, the Bureau of Land Management, the Forest 
Service, and local entities.
    (c) Authorized Activities.--In carrying out ecosystem restoration 
projects under this section, the Secretary shall undertake activities 
necessary to protect, monitor, and restore fish and wildlife habitat.
    (d) Cost Sharing Requirements.--
            (1) Studies.--Studies conducted under this section shall be 
        subject to cost sharing in accordance with section 206 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
            (2) Ecosystem restoration projects.--
                    (A) In general.--Non-Federal interests shall pay 35 
                percent of the cost of any ecosystem restoration 
                project carried out under this section.
                    (B) Items provided by non-federal interests.--
                            (i) In general.--Non-Federal interests 
                        shall provide all land, easements, rights-of-
                        way, dredged material disposal areas, and 
                        relocations necessary for ecosystem restoration 
                        projects to be carried out under this section.
                            (ii) Credit toward payment.--The value of 
                        the land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged 
                        material disposal areas, and relocations 
                        provided under paragraph (1) shall be credited 
                        toward the payment required under subsection 
                        (a).
                    (C) In-kind contributions.--100 percent of the non-
                Federal share required under subsection (a) may be 
                satisfied by the provision of in-kind contributions.
            (3) Operations and maintenance.--Non-Federal interests 
        shall be responsible for all costs associated with operating, 
        maintaining, replacing, repairing, and rehabilitating all 
        projects carried out under this section.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000.

SEC. 3105. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW YORK.

    Section 567 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3787) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:
    ``(c) Cooperation Agreements.--
            ``(1) In general.--In conducting the study and implementing 
        the strategy under this section, the Secretary shall enter into 
        cost-sharing and project cooperation agreements with the 
        Federal Government, State and local governments (with the 
        consent of the State and local governments), land trusts, or 
        nonprofit, nongovernmental organizations with expertise in 
        wetland restoration.
            ``(2) Financial assistance.--Under the cooperation 
        agreement, the Secretary may provide assistance for 
        implementation of wetland restoration projects and soil and 
        water conservation measures.''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (d) and inserting the following:
    ``(d) Implementation of Strategy.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out the 
        development, demonstration, and implementation of the strategy 
        under this section in cooperation with local landowners, local 
        government officials, and land trusts.
            ``(2) Goals of projects.--Projects to implement the 
        strategy under this subsection shall be designed to take 
        advantage of ongoing or planned actions by other agencies, 
        local municipalities, or nonprofit, nongovernmental 
        organizations with expertise in wetland restoration that would 
        increase the effectiveness or decrease the overall cost of 
        implementing recommended projects.''.

SEC. 3106. NARRAGANSETT BAY, RHODE ISLAND.

    The Secretary may use amounts in the Environmental Restoration 
Account, Formerly Used Defense Sites, under section 2703(a)(5) of title 
10, United States Code, for the removal of abandoned marine camels at 
any Formerly Used Defense Site under the jurisdiction of the Department 
of Defense that is undergoing (or is scheduled to undergo) 
environmental remediation under chapter 160 of title 10, United States 
Code (and other provisions of law), in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, 
in accordance with the Corps of Engineers prioritization process under 
the Formerly Used Defense Sites program.

SEC. 3107. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL 
              AT RICHARD B. RUSSELL LAKE, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall convey to the State of South 
Carolina, by quitclaim deed, all right, title, and interest of the 
United States in and to the parcels of land described in subsection 
(b)(1) that are managed, as of the date of enactment of this Act, by 
the South Carolina Department of Commerce for public recreation 
purposes for the Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, South Carolina, 
project authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 
Stat. 1420).
    (b) Land Description.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the 
        parcels of land referred to in subsection (a) are the parcels 
        contained in the portion of land described in Army Lease Number 
        DACW21-1-92-0500.
            (2) Retention of interests.--The United States shall 
        retain--
                    (A) ownership of all land included in the lease 
                referred to in paragraph (1) that would have been 
                acquired for operational purposes in accordance with 
                the 1971 implementation of the 1962 Army/Interior Joint 
                Acquisition Policy; and
                    (B) such other land as is determined by the 
                Secretary to be required for authorized project 
                purposes, including easement rights-of-way to remaining 
                Federal land.
            (3) Survey.--The exact acreage and legal description of the 
        land described in paragraph (1) shall be determined by a survey 
        satisfactory to the Secretary, with the cost of the survey to 
        be paid by the State.
    (c) General Provisions.--
            (1) Applicability of property screening provisions.--
        Section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply 
        to the conveyance under this section.
            (2) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may 
        require that the conveyance under this section be subject to 
        such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers 
        appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
            (3) Costs of conveyance.--
                    (A) In general.--The State shall be responsible for 
                all costs, including real estate transaction and 
                environmental compliance costs, associated with the 
                conveyance under this section.
                    (B) Form of contribution.--As determined 
                appropriate by the Secretary, in lieu of payment of 
                compensation to the United States under subparagraph 
                (A), the State may perform certain environmental or 
                real estate actions associated with the conveyance 
                under this section if those actions are performed in 
                close coordination with, and to the satisfaction of, 
                the United States.
            (4) Liability.--The State shall hold the United States 
        harmless from any liability with respect to activities carried 
        out, on or after the date of the conveyance, on the real 
        property conveyed under this section.
    (d) Additional Terms and Conditions.--
            (1) In general.--The State shall pay fair market value 
        consideration, as determined by the United States, for any land 
        included in the conveyance under this section.
            (2) No effect on shore management policy.--The Shoreline 
        Management Policy (ER-1130-2-406) of the Corps of Engineers 
        shall not be changed or altered for any proposed development of 
        land conveyed under this section.
            (3) Federal statutes.--The conveyance under this section 
        shall be subject to the National Environmental Policy Act of 
        1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) (including public review under 
        that Act) and other Federal statutes.
            (4) Cost sharing.--In carrying out the conveyance under 
        this section, the Secretary and the State shall comply with all 
        obligations of any cost sharing agreement between the Secretary 
        and the State in effect as of the date of the conveyance.
            (5) Land not conveyed.--The State shall continue to manage 
        the land not conveyed under this section in accordance with the 
        terms and conditions of Army Lease Number DACW21-1-92-0500.

SEC. 3108. MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    (a) Membership.--Section 904(b)(1)(B) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2708) is amended--
            (1) in clause (vii), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) by redesignating clause (viii) as clause (ix); and
            (3) by inserting after clause (vii) the following:
                            ``(viii) rural water systems; and''.
    (b) Reauthorization.--Section 907(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2712) is amended in the first 
sentence by striking ``2005'' and inserting ``2010''.

SEC. 3109. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT PROJECT.

    Section 514 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 343; 117 Stat. 142) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections 
        (h) and (i), respectively;
            (2) in subsection (h) (as redesignated by paragraph (1)), 
        by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following:
            ``(1) Non-federal share.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The non-Federal share of the 
                cost of projects may be provided--
                            ``(i) in cash;
                            ``(ii) by the provision of land, easements, 
                        rights-of-way, relocations, or disposal areas;
                            ``(iii) by in-kind services to implement 
                        the project; or
                            ``(iv) by any combination of the foregoing.
                    ``(B) Private ownership.--Land needed for a project 
                under this authority may remain in private ownership 
                subject to easements that are--
                            ``(i) satisfactory to the Secretary; and
                            ``(ii) necessary to assure achievement of 
                        the project purposes.'';
            (3) in subsection (i) (as redesignated by paragraph (1)), 
        by striking ``for the period of fiscal years 2000 and 2001.'' 
        and inserting ``per year, and that authority shall extend until 
        Federal fiscal year 2011.''; and
            (4) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:
    ``(f) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
undertaken under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
regional or national nonprofit entity with the consent of the affected 
local government.
    ``(g) Cost Limitation.--Not more than $5,000,000 in Federal funds 
may be allotted under this section for a project at any single 
locality.''

SEC. 3110. NONCONNAH WEIR, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE.

    The project for flood control, Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee and 
Mississippi, authorized by section 401 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124) and modified by the section 
334 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2611), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary--
            (1) to reconstruct, at full Federal expense, the weir 
        originally constructed in the vicinity of the mouth of 
        Nonconnah Creek; and
            (2) to make repairs and maintain the weir in the future so 
        that the weir functions properly.

SEC. 3111. OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, CUMBERLAND RIVER, TENNESSEE.

    (a) Release of Retained Rights, Interests, Reservations.--With 
respect to land conveyed by the Secretary to the Tennessee Society of 
Crippled Children and Adults, Incorporated (commonly known as ``Easter 
Seals Tennessee'') at Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Cumberland River, 
Tennessee, under section 211 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
1087), the reversionary interests and the use restrictions relating to 
recreation and camping purposes are extinguished.
    (b) Instrument of Release.--As soon as practicable after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall execute and file in the 
appropriate office a deed of release, amended deed, or other 
appropriate instrument effectuating the release of interests required 
by subsection (a).
    (c) No Effect on Other Rights.--Nothing in this section affects any 
remaining right or interest of the Corps of Engineers with respect to 
an authorized purpose of any project.

SEC. 3112. SANDY CREEK, JACKSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may carry out a project for flood 
damage reduction under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 
U.S.C. 701s) at Sandy Creek, Jackson County, Tennessee, if the 
Secretary determines that the project is technically sound, 
environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.
    (b) Relationship to West Tennessee Tributaries Project, 
Tennessee.--Consistent with the report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
March 24, 1948, on the West Tennessee Tributaries project--
            (1) Sandy Creek shall not be considered to be an authorized 
        channel of the West Tennessee Tributaries Project; and
            (2) the Sandy Creek flood damage reduction project shall 
        not be considered to be part of the West Tennessee Tributaries 
        Project.

SEC. 3113. CEDAR BAYOU, TEXAS.

    Section 349(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2632) is amended by striking ``except that the project is 
authorized only for construction of a navigation channel 12 feet deep 
by 125 feet wide'' and inserting ``except that the project is 
authorized for construction of a navigation channel that is 10 feet 
deep by 100 feet wide''.

SEC. 3114. DENISON, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall offer to convey at fair market 
value to the city of Denison, Texas (or a designee of the city), all 
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
approximately 900 acres of land located in Grayson County, Texas, which 
is currently subject to an Application for Lease for Public Park and 
Recreational Purposes made by the city of Denison, dated August 17, 
2005.
    (b) Survey to Obtain Legal Description.--The exact acreage and 
description of the real property referred to in subsection (a) shall be 
determined by a survey paid for by the city of Denison, Texas (or a 
designee of the city), that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
    (c) Conveyance.--On acceptance by the city of Denison, Texas (or a 
designee of the city), of an offer under subsection (a), the Secretary 
may immediately convey the land surveyed under subsection (b) by 
quitclaim deed to the city of Denison, Texas (or a designee of the 
city).

SEC. 3115. CENTRAL CITY, FORT WORTH, TEXAS.

    For the purposes of achieving efficiencies, enhanced benefits, and 
complementary implementation, as compared with construction of the 
projects separately, the project for flood control and other purposes 
authorized by section 116 of division C of title I of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-447; 118 Stat. 2944), is 
modified to include the project for ecosystem restoration, as generally 
defined in the report of the report of the Chief of Engineers entitled 
``Riverside Oxbow, Fort Worth, Texas'' and dated May 29, 2003, at a 
total cost of $247,110,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$121,210,000 and a non-Federal cost of $125,900,000.

SEC. 3116. FREEPORT HARBOR, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Freeport Harbor, 
Texas, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 
(84 Stat. 1818), is modified to provide that--
            (1) all project costs incurred as a result of the discovery 
        of the sunken vessel COMSTOCK of the Corps of Engineers are a 
        Federal responsibility; and
            (2) the Secretary shall not seek further obligation or 
        responsibility for removal of the vessel COMSTOCK, or costs 
        associated with a delay due to the discovery of the sunken 
        vessel COMSTOCK, from the Port of Freeport.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--This section does not affect the authorized cost 
sharing for the balance of the project described in subsection (a).

SEC. 3117. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS.

    Section 575(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3789; 113 Stat. 311) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding the following:
            ``(5) the project for flood control, Upper White Oak Bayou, 
        Texas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4125).''.

SEC. 3118. CONNECTICUT RIVER RESTORATION, VERMONT.

    Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-5b), with respect to the study entitled ``Connecticut 
River Restoration Authority'', dated May 23, 2001, a nonprofit entity 
may act as the non-Federal interest for purposes of carrying out the 
activities described in the agreement executed between The Nature 
Conservancy and the Department of the Army on August 5, 2005.

SEC. 3119. DAM REMEDIATION, VERMONT.

    Section 543 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2673) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the 
                end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) may carry out measures to restore, protect, and 
        preserve an ecosystem affected by a dam described in subsection 
        (b).''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following:
            ``(11) Camp Wapanacki, Hardwick.
            ``(12) Star Lake Dam, Mt. Holly.
            ``(13) Curtis Pond, Calais.
            ``(14) Weathersfield Reservoir, Springfield.
            ``(15) Burr Pond, Sudbury.
            ``(16) Maidstone Lake, Guildhall.
            ``(17) Upper and Lower Hurricane Dam.
            ``(18) Lake Fairlee.
            ``(19) West Charleston Dam.''.

SEC. 3120. LAKE CHAMPLAIN EURASIAN MILFOIL, WATER CHESTNUT, AND OTHER 
              NONNATIVE PLANT CONTROL, VERMONT.

    Under authority of section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
(33 U.S.C. 610), the Secretary shall revise the existing General Design 
Memorandum to permit the use of chemical means of control, when 
appropriate, of Eurasian milfoil, water chestnuts, and other nonnative 
plants in the Lake Champlain basin, Vermont.

SEC. 3121. UPPER CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN WETLAND RESTORATION, VERMONT 
              AND NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the States of 
Vermont and New Hampshire, shall carry out a study and develop a 
strategy for the use of wetland restoration, soil and water 
conservation practices, and nonstructural measures to reduce flood 
damage, improve water quality, and create wildlife habitat in the Upper 
Connecticut River watershed.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
        study and development of the strategy under subsection (a) 
        shall be 65 percent.
            (2) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
        of the study and development of the strategy may be provided 
        through the contribution of in-kind services and materials.
    (c) Non-Federal Interest.--A nonprofit organization with wetland 
restoration experience may serve as the non-Federal interest for the 
study and development of the strategy under this section.
    (d) Cooperative Agreements.--In conducting the study and developing 
the strategy under this section, the Secretary may enter into 1 or more 
cooperative agreements to provide technical assistance to appropriate 
Federal, State, and local agencies and nonprofit organizations with 
wetland restoration experience, including assistance for the 
implementation of wetland restoration projects and soil and water 
conservation measures.
    (e) Implementation.--The Secretary shall carry out development and 
implementation of the strategy under this section in cooperation with 
local landowners and local government officials.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 3122. UPPER CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, VERMONT 
              AND NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    (a) General Management Plan Development.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
        Secretary of Agriculture and in consultation with the States of 
        Vermont and New Hampshire and the Connecticut River Joint 
        Commission, shall conduct a study and develop a general 
        management plan for ecosystem restoration of the Upper 
        Connecticut River ecosystem for the purposes of--
                    (A) habitat protection and restoration;
                    (B) streambank stabilization;
                    (C) restoration of stream stability;
                    (D) water quality improvement;
                    (E) invasive species control;
                    (F) wetland restoration;
                    (G) fish passage; and
                    (H) natural flow restoration.
            (2) Existing plans.--In developing the general management 
        plan, the Secretary shall depend heavily on existing plans for 
        the restoration of the Upper Connecticut River.
    (b) Critical Restoration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may participate in any 
        critical restoration project in the Upper Connecticut River 
        Basin in accordance with the general management plan developed 
        under subsection (a).
            (2) Eligible projects.--A critical restoration project 
        shall be eligible for assistance under this section if the 
        project--
                    (A) meets the purposes described in the general 
                management plan developed under subsection (a); and
                    (B) with respect to the Upper Connecticut River and 
                Upper Connecticut River watershed, consists of--
                            (i) bank stabilization of the main stem, 
                        tributaries, and streams;
                            (ii) wetland restoration and migratory bird 
                        habitat restoration;
                            (iii) soil and water conservation;
                            (iv) restoration of natural flows;
                            (v) restoration of stream stability;
                            (vi) implementation of an intergovernmental 
                        agreement for coordinating ecosystem 
                        restoration, fish passage installation, 
                        streambank stabilization, wetland restoration, 
                        habitat protection and restoration, or natural 
                        flow restoration;
                            (vii) water quality improvement;
                            (viii) invasive species control;
                            (ix) wetland restoration and migratory bird 
                        habitat restoration;
                            (x) improvements in fish migration; and
                            (xi) conduct of any other project or 
                        activity determined to be appropriate by the 
                        Secretary.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of any project 
carried out under this section shall not be less than 65 percent.
    (d) Non-Federal Interest.--A nonprofit organization may serve as 
the non-Federal interest for a project carried out under this section.
    (e) Crediting.--
            (1) For work.--The Secretary shall provide credit, 
        including credit for in-kind contributions of up to 100 percent 
        of the non-Federal share, for work (including design work and 
        materials) if the Secretary determines that the work performed 
        by the non-Federal interest is integral to the product.
            (2) For other contributions.--The non-Federal interest 
        shall receive credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, 
        dredged material disposal areas, and relocations necessary to 
        implement the projects.
    (f) Cooperative Agreements.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary may enter into 1 or more cooperative agreements to provide 
financial assistance to appropriate Federal, State, or local 
governments or nonprofit agencies, including assistance for the 
implementation of projects to be carried out under subsection (b).
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 3123. LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED, VERMONT AND NEW YORK.

    Section 542 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2671) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(2)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``or'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as 
                subparagraph (G); and
                    (C) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the 
                following:
                    ``(E) river corridor assessment, protection, 
                management, and restoration for the purposes of 
                ecosystem restoration;
                    ``(F) geographic mapping conducted by the Secretary 
                using existing technical capacity to produce a high-
                resolution, multispectral satellite imagery-based land 
                use and cover data set; or'';
            (2) in subsection (e)(2)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A)--
                            (i) by striking ``The non-Federal'' and 
                        inserting the following:
                            ``(i) In general.--The non-Federal''; and
                            (ii) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(ii) Approval of district engineer.--
                        Approval of credit for design work of less than 
                        $100,000 shall be determined by the appropriate 
                        district engineer.''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``up to 50 
                percent of''; and
            (3) in subsection (g), by striking ``$20,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$32,000,000''.

SEC. 3124. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RESTORATION, VIRGINIA AND MARYLAND.

    Section 704(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2263(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (4);
            (2) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in the second sentence, by striking 
                ``$30,000,000'' and inserting ``$50,000,000''; and
                    (B) in the third sentence, by striking ``Such 
                projects'' and inserting the following:
            ``(2) Inclusions.--Such projects'';
            (3) by striking paragraph (2)(D) (as redesignated by 
        paragraph (2)(B)) and inserting the following:
                    ``(D) the restoration and rehabilitation of habitat 
                for fish, including native oysters, in the Chesapeake 
                Bay and its tributaries in Virginia and Maryland, 
                including--
                            ``(i) the construction of oyster bars and 
                        reefs;
                            ``(ii) the rehabilitation of existing 
                        marginal habitat;
                            ``(iii) the use of appropriate alternative 
                        substrate material in oyster bar and reef 
                        construction;
                            ``(iv) the construction and upgrading of 
                        oyster hatcheries; and
                            ``(v) activities relating to increasing the 
                        output of native oyster broodstock for seeding 
                        and monitoring of restored sites to ensure 
                        ecological success.
            ``(3) Restoration and rehabilitation activities.--The 
        restoration and rehabilitation activities described in 
        paragraph (2)(D) shall be--
                    ``(A) for the purpose of establishing permanent 
                sanctuaries and harvest management areas; and
                    ``(B) consistent with plans and strategies for 
                guiding the restoration of the Chesapeake Bay oyster 
                resource and fishery.''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Definition of ecological success.--In this 
        subsection, the term `ecological success' means--
                    ``(A) achieving a tenfold increase in native oyster 
                biomass by the year 2010, from a 1994 baseline; and
                    ``(B) the establishment of a sustainable fishery as 
                determined by a broad scientific and economic 
                consensus.''.

SEC. 3125. JAMES RIVER, VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall accept funds from the National Park Service to 
provide technical and project management assistance for the James 
River, Virginia, with a particular emphasis on locations along the 
shoreline adversely impacted by Hurricane Isabel.

SEC. 3126. TANGIER ISLAND SEAWALL, VIRGINIA.

    Section 577(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3789) is amended by striking ``at a total cost of $1,200,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $900,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $300,000.'' and inserting ``at a total cost of $3,000,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $2,400,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $600,000.''.

SEC. 3127. EROSION CONTROL, PUGET ISLAND, WAHKIAKUM COUNTY, WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The Lower Columbia River levees and bank 
protection works authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 
1950 (64 Stat. 178) is modified with regard to the Wahkiakum County 
diking districts No. 1 and 3, but without regard to any cost ceiling 
authorized before the date of enactment of this Act, to direct the 
Secretary to provide a 1-time placement of dredged material along 
portions of the Columbia River shoreline of Puget Island, Washington, 
between river miles 38 to 47, and the shoreline of Westport Beach, 
Clatsop County, Oregon, between river miles 43 to 45, to protect 
economic and environmental resources in the area from further erosion.
    (b) Coordination and Cost Sharing Requirements.--The Secretary 
shall carry out subsection (a)--
            (1) in coordination with appropriate resource agencies;
            (2) in accordance with all applicable Federal law 
        (including regulations); and
            (3) at full Federal expense.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000.

SEC. 3128. LOWER GRANITE POOL, WASHINGTON.

    (a) Extinguishment of Reversionary Interests and Use 
Restrictions.--With respect to property covered by each deed described 
in subsection (b)--
            (1) the reversionary interests and use restrictions 
        relating to port or industrial purposes are extinguished;
            (2) the human habitation or other building structure use 
        restriction is extinguished in each area in which the elevation 
        is above the standard project flood elevation; and
            (3) the use of fill material to raise low areas above the 
        standard project flood elevation is authorized, except in any 
        low area constituting wetland for which a permit under section 
        404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) 
        would be required for the use of fill material.
    (b) Deeds.--The deeds referred to in subsection (a) are as follows:
            (1) Auditor's File Numbers 432576, 443411, 499988, and 
        579771 of Whitman County, Washington.
            (2) Auditor's File Numbers 125806, 138801, 147888, 154511, 
        156928, and 176360 of Asotin County, Washington.
    (c) No Effect on Other Rights.--Nothing in this section affects any 
remaining rights and interests of the Corps of Engineers for authorized 
project purposes in or to property covered by a deed described in 
subsection (b).

SEC. 3129. MCNARY LOCK AND DAM, MCNARY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, 
              WASHINGTON AND IDAHO.

    (a) Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction.--Administrative 
jurisdiction over the land acquired for the McNary Lock and Dam Project 
and managed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service under 
Cooperative Agreement Number DACW68-4-00-13 with the Corps of 
Engineers, Walla Walla District, is transferred from the Secretary to 
the Secretary of the Interior.
    (b) Easements.--The transfer of administrative jurisdiction under 
subsection (a) shall be subject to easements in existence as of the 
date of enactment of this Act on land subject to the transfer.
    (c) Rights of Secretary.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (3), the 
        Secretary shall retain rights described in paragraph (2) with 
        respect to the land for which administrative jurisdiction is 
        transferred under subsection (a).
            (2) Rights.--The rights of the Secretary referred to in 
        paragraph (1) are the rights--
                    (A) to flood land described in subsection (a) to 
                the standard project flood elevation;
                    (B) to manipulate the level of the McNary Project 
                Pool;
                    (C) to access such land described in subsection (a) 
                as may be required to install, maintain, and inspect 
                sediment ranges and carry out similar activities;
                    (D) to construct and develop wetland, riparian 
                habitat, or other environmental restoration features 
                authorized by section 1135 of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) and section 
                206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
                U.S.C. 2330);
                    (E) to dredge and deposit fill materials; and
                    (F) to carry out management actions for the purpose 
                of reducing the take of juvenile salmonids by avian 
                colonies that inhabit, before, on, or after the date of 
                enactment of this Act, any island included in the land 
                described in subsection (a).
            (3) Coordination.--Before exercising a right described in 
        any of subparagraphs (C) through (F) of paragraph (2), the 
        Secretary shall coordinate the exercise with the United States 
        Fish and Wildlife Service.
    (d) Management.--
            (1) In general.--The land described in subsection (a) shall 
        be managed by the Secretary of the Interior as part of the 
        McNary National Wildlife Refuge.
            (2) Cummins property.--
                    (A) Retention of credits.--Habitat unit credits 
                described in the memorandum entitled ``Design 
                Memorandum No. 6, LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE 
                COMPENSATION PLAN, Wildlife Compensation and Fishing 
                Access Site Selection, Letter Supplement No. 15, SITE 
                DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE WALLULA HMU'' provided for the 
                Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan 
                through development of the parcel of land formerly 
                known as the ``Cummins property'' shall be retained by 
                the Secretary despite any changes in management of the 
                parcel on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                    (B) Site development plan.--The United States Fish 
                and Wildlife Service shall obtain prior approval of the 
                Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife for 
                any change to the previously approved site development 
                plan for the parcel of land formerly known as the 
                ``Cummins property''.
            (3) Madame dorian recreation area.--The United States Fish 
        and Wildlife Service shall continue operation of the Madame 
        Dorian Recreation Area for public use and boater access.
    (e) Administrative Costs.--The United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service shall be responsible for all survey, environmental compliance, 
and other administrative costs required to implement the transfer of 
administrative jurisdiction under subsection (a).

SEC. 3130. SNAKE RIVER PROJECT, WASHINGTON AND IDAHO.

    The Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan for the Lower Snake River, 
Washington and Idaho, as authorized by section 101 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2921), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to conduct studies and implement aquatic and 
riparian ecosystem restorations and improvements specifically for 
fisheries and wildlife.

SEC. 3131. WHATCOM CREEK WATERWAY, BELLINGHAM, WASHINGTON.

    That portion of the project for navigation, Whatcom Creek Waterway, 
Bellingham, Washington, authorized by the Act of June 25, 1910 (36 
Stat. 664, chapter 382) (commonly known as the ``River and Harbor Act 
of 1910'') and the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 299), 
consisting of the last 2,900 linear feet of the inner portion of the 
waterway, and beginning at station 29+00 to station 0+00, shall not be 
authorized as of the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3132. LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction at Lower Mud River, Milton, 
West Virginia, authorized by section 580 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3790; 114 Stat. 2612), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project in accordance with 
the recommended plan described in the Draft Limited Reevaluation Report 
of the Corps of Engineers dated May 2004, at a total cost of 
$57,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $42,825,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $14,275,000.

SEC. 3133. MCDOWELL COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA.

    (a) In General.--The McDowell County nonstructural component of the 
project for flood control, Levisa and Tug Fork of the Big Sandy and 
Cumberland Rivers, West Virginia, Virginia, and Kentucky, authorized by 
section 202(a) of the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 
1981 (94 Stat. 1339), is modified to direct the Secretary to take 
measures to provide protection, throughout McDowell County, West 
Virginia, from the reoccurrence of the greater of--
            (1) the April 1977 flood;
            (2) the July 2001 flood;
            (3) the May 2002 flood; or
            (4) the 100-year frequency event.
    (b) Updates and Revisions.--The measures under subsection (a) shall 
be carried out in accordance with, and during the development of, the 
updates and revisions under section 2006(e)(2).

SEC. 3134. GREEN BAY HARBOR PROJECT, GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN.

    The portion of the inner harbor of the Federal navigation channel 
of the Green Bay Harbor project, authorized by the first section of the 
Act entitled ``An Act making appropriations for the construction, 
repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, 
and for other purposes'', approved July 5, 1884 (commonly known as the 
``River and Harbor Act of 1884'') (23 Stat. 136, chapter 229), from 
Station 190+00 to Station 378+00 is authorized to a width of 75 feet 
and a depth of 6 feet.

SEC. 3135. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WISCONSIN.

    (a) In General..--The portion of the project for navigation, 
Manitowoc Harbor, Wisconsin, authorized by the first section of the 
River and Harbor Act of August 30, 1852 (10 Stat. 58), consisting of 
the channel in the south part of the outer harbor, deauthorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176), may be 
carried out by the Secretary.
    (b) Limitation.--No construction on the project may be initiated 
until the Secretary determines that the project is feasible.

SEC. 3136. OCONTO HARBOR, WISCONSIN.

    (a) In General.--The portion of the project for navigation, Oconto 
Harbor, Wisconsin, authorized by the Act of August 2, 1882 (22 Stat. 
196, chapter 375), and the Act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 664, chapter 
382) (commonly known as the ``River and Harbor Act of 1910''), 
consisting of a 15-foot-deep turning basin in the Oconto River, as 
described in subsection (b), is no longer authorized.
    (b) Project Description.--The project referred to in subsection (a) 
is more particularly described as--
            (1) beginning at a point along the western limit of the 
        existing project, N. 394,086.71, E. 2,530,202.71;
            (2) thence northeasterly about 619.93 feet to a point N. 
        394,459.10, E. 2,530,698.33;
            (3) thence southeasterly about 186.06 feet to a point N. 
        394,299.20, E. 2,530,793.47;
            (4) thence southwesterly about 355.07 feet to a point N. 
        393,967.13, E. 2,530,667.76;
            (5) thence southwesterly about 304.10 feet to a point N. 
        393,826.90, E. 2,530,397.92; and
            (6) thence northwesterly about 324.97 feet to the point of 
        origin.

SEC. 3137. MISSISSIPPI RIVER HEADWATERS RESERVOIRS.

    Section 21 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 
Stat. 4027) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``1276.42'' and inserting 
                ``1278.42'';
                    (B) by striking ``1218.31'' and inserting 
                ``1221.31''; and
                    (C) by striking ``1234.82'' and inserting 
                ``1235.30''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Exception.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may operate the headwaters 
        reservoirs below the minimum or above the maximum water levels 
        established under subsection (a) in accordance with water 
        control regulation manuals (or revisions to those manuals) 
        developed by the Secretary, after consultation with the 
        Governor of Minnesota and affected tribal governments, 
        landowners, and commercial and recreational users.
            ``(2) Effective date of manuals.--The water control 
        regulation manuals referred to in paragraph (1) (and any 
        revisions to those manuals) shall be effective as of the date 
        on which the Secretary submits the manuals (or revisions) to 
        Congress.
            ``(3) Notification.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Except as provided in 
                subparagraph (B), not less than 14 days before 
                operating any headwaters reservoir below the minimum or 
                above the maximum water level limits specified in 
                subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to Congress 
                a notice of intent to operate the headwaters reservoir.
                    ``(B) Exception.--Notice under subparagraph (A) 
                shall not be required in any case in which--
                            ``(i) the operation of a headwaters 
                        reservoir is necessary to prevent the loss of 
                        life or to ensure the safety of a dam; or
                            ``(ii) the drawdown of the water level of 
                        the reservoir is in anticipation of a flood 
                        control operation.''.

SEC. 3138. LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER MUSEUM AND RIVERFRONT INTERPRETIVE 
              SITE.

    Section 103(c)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4811) is amended by striking ``property currently held by 
the Resolution Trust Corporation in the vicinity of the Mississippi 
River Bridge'' and inserting ``riverfront property''.

SEC. 3139. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any Upper Mississippi River fish 
and wildlife habitat rehabilitation and enhancement project carried out 
under section 1103(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 652(e)), with the consent of the affected local government, 
a nongovernmental organization may be considered to be a non-Federal 
interest.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1103(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(1)(A)(ii)) is 
amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: ``, 
including research on water quality issues affecting the Mississippi 
River, including elevated nutrient levels, and the development of 
remediation strategies''.

SEC. 3140. UPPER BASIN OF MISSOURI RIVER.

    (a) Use of Funds.--Notwithstanding the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-103; 119 Stat. 2247), funds 
made available for recovery or mitigation activities in the lower basin 
of the Missouri River may be used for recovery or mitigation activities 
in the upper basin of the Missouri River, including the States of 
Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The matter under the heading ``missouri 
river mitigation, missouri, kansas, iowa, and nebraska'' of section 
601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4143), 
as modified by section 334 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 306), is amended by adding at the end the following: 
``The Secretary may carry out any recovery or mitigation activities in 
the upper basin of the Missouri River, including the States of Montana, 
Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota, using funds made available 
under this heading in accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 
1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and consistent with the project purposes 
of the Missouri River Mainstem System as authorized by section 10 of 
the Act of December 22, 1944 (commonly known as the `Flood Control Act 
of 1944') (58 Stat. 897).''.

SEC. 3141. GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROGRAM.

    (a) Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration.--Section 506(c) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-22(c)) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs 
        (3) and (4), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) Reconnaissance studies.--Before planning, designing, 
        or constructing a project under paragraph (3), the Secretary 
        shall carry out a reconnaissance study--
                    ``(A) to identify methods of restoring the fishery, 
                ecosystem, and beneficial uses of the Great Lakes; and
                    ``(B) to determine whether planning of a project 
                under paragraph (3) should proceed.''; and
            (3) in paragraph (4)(A) (as redesignated by paragraph (1)), 
        by striking ``paragraph (2)'' and inserting ``paragraph (3)''.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Section 506(f) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-22(f)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (5) as 
        paragraphs (3) through (6), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) Reconnaissance studies.--Any reconnaissance study 
        under subsection (c)(2) shall be carried out at full Federal 
        expense.'';
            (3) in paragraph (3) (as redesignated by paragraph (1)), by 
        striking ``(2) or (3)'' and inserting ``(3) or (4)''; and
            (4) in paragraph (4)(A) (as redesignated by paragraph (1)), 
        by striking ``subsection (c)(2)'' and inserting ``subsection 
        (c)(3)''.

SEC. 3142. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS AND SEDIMENT REMEDIATION.

    Section 401(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 
Stat. 4644; 33 U.S.C. 1268 note) is amended by striking ``through 
2006'' and inserting ``through 2011''.

SEC. 3143. GREAT LAKES TRIBUTARY MODELS.

    Section 516(g)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(33 U.S.C. 2326b(g)(2)) is amended by striking ``through 2006'' and 
inserting ``through 2011''.

SEC. 3144. UPPER OHIO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES NAVIGATION SYSTEM NEW 
              TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAM.

    (a) Definition of Upper Ohio River and Tributaries Navigation 
System.--In this section, the term ``Upper Ohio River and Tributaries 
Navigation System'' means the Allegheny, Kanawha, Monongahela, and Ohio 
Rivers.
    (b) Establishment.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a pilot 
        program to evaluate new technologies applicable to the Upper 
        Ohio River and Tributaries Navigation System.
            (2) Inclusions.--The program may include the design, 
        construction, or implementation of innovative technologies and 
        solutions for the Upper Ohio River and Tributaries Navigation 
        System, including projects for--
                    (A) improved navigation;
                    (B) environmental stewardship;
                    (C) increased navigation reliability; and
                    (D) reduced navigation costs.
            (3) Purposes.--The purposes of the program shall be, with 
        respect to the Upper Ohio River and Tributaries Navigation 
        System--
                    (A) to increase the reliability and availability of 
                federally-owned and federally-operated navigation 
                facilities;
                    (B) to decrease system operational risks; and
                    (C) to improve--
                            (i) vessel traffic management;
                            (ii) access; and
                            (iii) Federal asset management.
    (c) Federal Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
federally owned.
    (d) Local Cooperation Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into local 
        cooperation agreements with non-Federal interests to provide 
        for the design, construction, installation, and operation of 
        the projects to be carried out under the program.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
        into under this subsection shall include the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a navigation improvement project, 
                including appropriate engineering plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the effective 
                long-term operation of the project.
            (3) Cost sharing.--Total project costs under each local 
        cooperation agreement shall be cost-shared in accordance with 
        the formula relating to the applicable original construction 
        project.
            (4) Expenditures.--
                    (A) In general.--Expenditures under the program may 
                include, for establishment at federally-owned property, 
                such as locks, dams, and bridges--
                            (i) transmitters;
                            (ii) responders;
                            (iii) hardware;
                            (iv) software; and
                            (v) wireless networks.
                    (B) Exclusions.--Transmitters, responders, 
                hardware, software, and wireless networks or other 
                equipment installed on privately-owned vessels or 
                equipment shall not be eligible under the program.
    (e) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2008, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report on the results of the pilot program carried 
out under this section, together with recommendations concerning 
whether the program or any component of the program should be 
implemented on a national basis.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,100,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 3145. PERRY CREEK, IOWA.

    (a) In General.--On making a determination described in subsection 
(b), the Secretary shall increase the Federal contribution for the 
project for flood control, Perry Creek, Iowa, authorized under section 
401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4116; 
117 Stat. 1844).
    (b) Determination.--A determination referred to in subsection (a) 
is a determination that a modification to the project described in that 
subsection is necessary for the Federal Emergency Management Agency to 
certify that the project provides flood damage reduction benefits to at 
least a 100-year level.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $4,000,000.

SEC. 3146. RATHBUN LAKE, IOWA.

    (a) Right of First Refusal.--The Secretary shall provide, in 
accordance with the recommendations in the Rathbun Lake Reallocation 
Report approved by the Chief of Engineers on July 22, 1985, the Rathbun 
Regional Water Association with the right of first refusal to contract 
for or purchase any increment of the remaining allocation (8,320 acre-
feet) of water supply storage in Rathbun Lake, Iowa.
    (b) Payment of Cost.--The Rathbun Regional Water Association shall 
pay the cost of any water supply storage allocation provided under 
subsection (a).

SEC. 3147. JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) Modification.--Section 331 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 305) is amended by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$9,000,000''.
    (b) Applicability of Credit.--The credit provided by section 331 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 305) (as 
modified by subsection (a)) shall apply to costs incurred by the 
Jackson County Board of Supervisors during the period beginning on 
February 8, 1994, and ending on the date of enactment of this Act for 
projects authorized by section 219(c)(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334; 
113 Stat. 1494; 114 Stat. 2763A-219).

SEC. 3148. SANDBRIDGE BEACH, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.

    The project for beach erosion control and hurricane protection, 
Sandbridge Beach, Virginia Beach, Virginia, authorized by section 
101(22) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4804; 
114 Stat. 2612), is modified to authorize the Secretary to review the 
project to determine whether any additional Federal interest exists 
with respect to the project, taking into consideration conditions and 
development levels relating to the project in existence on the date of 
enactment of this Act.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

SEC. 4001. SEWARD BREAKWATER, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall review the Seward Boat Harbor element of the 
project for navigation, Seward Harbor, Alaska, authorized by section 
101(a)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
274), to determine whether the failure of the outer breakwater to 
protect the harbor from heavy wave damage resulted from a design 
deficiency.

SEC. 4002. NOME HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall review the project for navigation, Nome Harbor 
improvements, Alaska, authorized by section 101(a)(1) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 273), to determine whether 
the project cost increases, including the cost of rebuilding the 
entrance channel damaged in a September 2005 storm, resulted from a 
design deficiency.

SEC. 4003. MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION CHANNEL.

    (a) In General.--To determine with improved accuracy the 
environmental impacts of the project on the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas 
River Navigation Channel (referred to in this section as the 
``MKARN''), the Secretary shall carry out the measures described in 
subsection (b) in a timely manner.
    (b) Species Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in conjunction with 
        Oklahoma State University, shall convene a panel of experts 
        with acknowledged expertise in wildlife biology and genetics to 
        review the available scientific information regarding the 
        genetic variation of various sturgeon species and possible 
        hybrids of those species that, as determined by the United 
        States Fish and Wildlife Service, may exist in any portion of 
        the MKARN.
            (2) Report.--The Secretary shall direct the panel to report 
        to the Secretary, not later than 1 year after the date of 
        enactment of this Act and in the best scientific judgment of 
        the panel--
                    (A) the level of genetic variation between 
                populations of sturgeon sufficient to determine or 
                establish that a population is a measurably distinct 
                species, subspecies, or population segment; and
                    (B) whether any pallid sturgeons that may be found 
                in the MKARN (including any tributary of the MKARN) 
                would qualify as such a distinct species, subspecies, 
                or population segment.

SEC. 4004. FRUITVALE AVENUE RAILROAD BRIDGE, ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall prepare a comprehensive report 
that examines the condition of the existing Fruitvale Avenue Railroad 
Bridge, Alameda County, California (referred to in this section as the 
``Railroad Bridge''), and determines the most economic means to 
maintain that rail link by either repairing or replacing the Railroad 
Bridge.
    (b) Requirements.--The report under this section shall include--
            (1) a determination of whether the Railroad Bridge is in 
        immediate danger of failing or collapsing;
            (2) the annual costs to maintain the Railroad Bridge;
            (3) the costs to place the Railroad Bridge in a safe, ``no-
        collapse'' condition, such that the Railroad Bridge will not 
        endanger maritime traffic;
            (4) the costs to retrofit the Railroad Bridge such that the 
        Railroad Bridge may continue to serve as a rail link between 
        the Island of Alameda and the Mainland; and
            (5) the costs to construct a replacement for the Railroad 
        Bridge capable of serving the current and future rail, light 
        rail, and homeland security needs of the region.
    (c) Submission of Report.--The Secretary shall--
            (1) complete the Railroad Bridge report under subsection 
        (a) not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this 
        Act; and
            (2) submit the report to the Committee on Environment and 
        Public Works of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
    (d) Limitations.--The Secretary shall not--
            (1) demolish the Railroad Bridge or otherwise render the 
        Railroad Bridge unavailable or unusable for rail traffic; or
            (2) reduce maintenance of the Railroad Bridge.
    (e) Easement.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall provide to the city of 
        Alameda, California, a nonexclusive access easement over the 
        Oakland Estuary that comprises the subsurface land and surface 
        approaches for the Railroad Bridge that--
                    (A) is consistent with the Bay Trail Proposal of 
                the City of Oakland; and
                    (B) is otherwise suitable for the improvement, 
                operation, and maintenance of the Railroad Bridge or 
                construction, operation, and maintenance of a suitable 
                replacement bridge.
            (2) Cost.--The easement under paragraph (1) shall be 
        provided to the city of Alameda without consideration and at no 
        cost to the United States.

SEC. 4005. LOS ANGELES RIVER REVITALIZATION STUDY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the city of 
Los Angeles, shall--
            (1) prepare a feasibility study for environmental ecosystem 
        restoration, flood control, recreation, and other aspects of 
        Los Angeles River revitalization that is consistent with the 
        goals of the Los Angeles River Revitalization Master Plan 
        published by the city of Los Angeles; and
            (2) consider any locally-preferred project alternatives 
        developed through a full and open evaluation process for 
        inclusion in the study.
    (b) Use of Existing Information and Measures.--In preparing the 
study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall use, to the maximum 
extent practicable--
            (1) information obtained from the Los Angeles River 
        Revitalization Master Plan; and
            (2) the development process of that plan.
    (c) Demonstration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to construct 
        demonstration projects in order to provide information to 
        develop the study under subsection (a)(1).
            (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of any 
        project under this subsection shall be not more than 65 
        percent.
            (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $25,000,000.

SEC. 4006. NICHOLAS CANYON, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall carry out a study for bank stabilization and 
shore protection for Nicholas Canyon, Los Angeles, California, under 
section 3 of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g).

SEC. 4007. OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA, SHORELINE SPECIAL STUDY.

    Section 414 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 
Stat. 2636) is amended by striking ``32 months'' and inserting ``44 
months''.

SEC. 4008. COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT, ST. HELENA, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Flood Protection Project.--
            (1) Review.--The Secretary shall review the project for 
        flood control and environmental restoration at St. Helena, 
        California, generally in accordance with Enhanced Minimum Plan 
        A, as described in the final environmental impact report 
        prepared by the city of St. Helena, California, and certified 
        by the city to be in compliance with the California 
        Environmental Quality Act on February 24, 2004.
            (2) Action on determination.--If the Secretary determines 
        under paragraph (1) that the project is economically justified, 
        technically sound, and environmentally acceptable, the 
        Secretary is authorized to carry out the project at a total 
        cost of $30,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $19,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $10,500,000.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Cost sharing for the project described in 
subsection (a) shall be in accordance with section 103 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213).

SEC. 4009. SAN FRANCISCO BAY, SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, SHERMAN 
              ISLAND, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall carry out a study of the feasibility of a 
project to use Sherman Island, California, as a dredged material 
rehandling facility for the beneficial use of dredged material to 
enhance the environment and meet other water resource needs on the 
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, under section 204 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326).

SEC. 4010. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY SHORELINE STUDY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with non-Federal 
interests, shall conduct a study of the feasibility of carrying out a 
project for--
            (1) flood protection of South San Francisco Bay shoreline;
            (2) restoration of the South San Francisco Bay salt ponds 
        (including on land owned by other Federal agencies); and
            (3) other related purposes, as the Secretary determines to 
        be appropriate.
    (b) Independent Review.--To the extent required by applicable 
Federal law, a national science panel shall conduct an independent 
review of the study under subsection (a).
    (c) Report.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 3 years after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
        report describing the results of the study under subsection 
        (a).
            (2) Inclusions.--The report under paragraph (1) shall 
        include recommendations of the Secretary with respect to the 
        project described in subsection (a) based on planning, design, 
        and land acquisition documents prepared by--
                    (A) the California State Coastal Conservancy;
                    (B) the Santa Clara Valley Water District; and
                    (C) other local interests.

SEC. 4011. SAN PABLO BAY WATERSHED RESTORATION, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall complete work as expeditiously 
as practicable on the study for the San Pablo watershed, California, 
authorized by section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 
1196) to determine the feasibility of opportunities for restoring, 
preserving, and protecting the San Pablo Bay Watershed.
    (b) Report.--Not later than March 31, 2008, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report that describes the results of the study.

SEC. 4012. FOUNTAIN CREEK, NORTH OF PUEBLO, COLORADO.

    Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary shall 
expedite the completion of the Fountain Creek, North of Pueblo, 
Colorado, watershed study authorized by a resolution adopted by the 
Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the House of 
Representatives on September 23, 1976.

SEC. 4013. SELENIUM STUDY, COLORADO.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with State water 
quality and resource and conservation agencies, shall conduct regional 
and watershed-wide studies to address selenium concentrations in the 
State of Colorado, including studies--
            (1) to measure selenium on specific sites; and
            (2) to determine whether specific selenium measures studied 
        should be recommended for use in demonstration projects.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.

SEC. 4014. DELAWARE INLAND BAYS AND TRIBUTARIES AND ATLANTIC COAST, 
              DELAWARE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of modifying the project for navigation, Indian River 
Inlet and Bay, Delaware.
    (b) Factors for Consideration and Priority.--In carrying out the 
study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
            (1) take into consideration all necessary activities to 
        stabilize the scour holes threatening the Inlet and Bay 
        shorelines; and
            (2) give priority to stabilizing and restoring the Inlet 
        channel and scour holes adjacent to the United States Coast 
        Guard pier and helipad and the adjacent State-owned properties.

SEC. 4015. HERBERT HOOVER DIKE SUPPLEMENTAL MAJOR REHABILITATION 
              REPORT, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall publish a supplemental 
report to the major rehabilitation report for the Herbert Hoover Dike 
system approved by the Chief of Engineers in November 2000.
    (b) Inclusions.--The supplemental report under subsection (a) shall 
include--
            (1) an evaluation of existing conditions at the Herbert 
        Hoover Dike system;
            (2) an identification of additional risks associated with 
        flood events at the system that are equal to or greater than 
        the standard projected flood risks;
            (3) an evaluation of the potential to integrate projects of 
        the Corps of Engineers into an enhanced flood protection system 
        for Lake Okeechobee, including--
                    (A) the potential for additional water storage 
                north of Lake Okeechobee; and
                    (B) an analysis of other project features included 
                in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan; and
            (4) a review of the report prepared for the South Florida 
        Water Management District dated April 2006.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,500,000.

SEC. 4016. BOISE RIVER, IDAHO.

    The study for flood control, Boise River, Idaho, authorized by 
section 414 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
324), is modified to include ecosystem restoration and water supply as 
project purposes to be studied.

SEC. 4017. PROMONTORY POINT THIRD-PARTY REVIEW, CHICAGO SHORELINE, 
              CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Review.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to conduct a 
        third-party review of the Promontory Point project along the 
        Chicago Shoreline, Chicago, Illinois, at a cost not to exceed 
        $450,000.
            (2) Joint review.--The Buffalo and Seattle Districts of the 
        Corps of Engineers shall jointly conduct the review under 
        paragraph (1).
            (3) Standards.--The review shall be based on the standards 
        under part 68 of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations (or 
        successor regulation), for implementation by the non-Federal 
        sponsor for the Chicago Shoreline Chicago, Illinois, project.
    (b) Contributions.--The Secretary shall accept from a State or 
political subdivision of a State voluntarily contributed funds to 
initiate the third-party review.
    (c) Treatment.--While the third-party review is of the Promontory 
Point portion of the Chicago Shoreline, Chicago, Illinois, project, the 
third-party review shall be separate and distinct from the Chicago 
Shoreline, Chicago, Illinois, project.
    (d) Effect of Section.--Nothing in this section affects the 
authorization for the Chicago Shoreline, Chicago, Illinois, project.

SEC. 4018. VIDALIA PORT, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation improvement at Vidalia, 
Louisiana.

SEC. 4019. LAKE ERIE AT LUNA PIER, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall study the feasibility of storm damage reduction 
and beach erosion protection and other related purposes along Lake Erie 
at Luna Pier, Michigan.

SEC. 4020. WILD RICE RIVER, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the general 
reevaluation report authorized by section 438 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2640) for the project for flood 
protection, Wild Rice River, Minnesota, authorized by section 201 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1825), to develop alternatives 
to the Twin Valley Lake feature of that project.

SEC. 4021. ASIAN CARP DISPERSAL BARRIER DEMONSTRATION PROJECT, UPPER 
              MISSISSIPPI RIVER.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out a study 
to determine the feasibility of constructing a fish barrier 
demonstration project to delay, deter, impede, or restrict the invasion 
of Asian carp into the northern reaches of the Upper Mississippi River.
    (b) Requirement.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall take into consideration the feasibility of locating the 
fish barrier at the lock portion of the project at Lock and Dam 11 in 
the Upper Mississippi River Basin.

SEC. 4022. FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction in Cuyahoga, Lake, 
Ashtabula, Geauga, Erie, Lucas, Sandusky, Huron, and Stark Counties, 
Ohio.

SEC. 4023. MIDDLE BASS ISLAND STATE PARK, MIDDLE BASS ISLAND, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall carry out a study of the feasibility of a 
project for navigation improvements, shoreline protection, and other 
related purposes, including the rehabilitation the harbor basin 
(including entrance breakwaters), interior shoreline protection, 
dredging, and the development of a public launch ramp facility, for 
Middle Bass Island State Park, Middle Bass Island, Ohio.

SEC. 4024. OHIO RIVER, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects for flood damage reduction on the Ohio River in 
Mahoning, Columbiana, Jefferson, Belmont, Noble, Monroe, Washington, 
Athens, Meigs, Gallia, Lawrence, and Scioto Counties, Ohio.

SEC. 4025. TOLEDO HARBOR DREDGED MATERIAL PLACEMENT, TOLEDO, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall study the feasibility of removing previously 
dredged and placed materials from the Toledo Harbor confined disposal 
facility, transporting the materials, and disposing of the materials in 
or at abandoned mine sites in southeastern Ohio.

SEC. 4026. TOLEDO HARBOR, MAUMEE RIVER, AND LAKE CHANNEL PROJECT, 
              TOLEDO, OHIO.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of constructing a project for navigation, Toledo, Ohio.
    (b) Factors for Consideration.--In conducting the study under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall take into consideration--
            (1) realigning the existing Toledo Harbor channel widening 
        occurring where the River Channel meets the Lake Channel from 
        the northwest to the southeast side of the Channel;
            (2) realigning the entire 200-foot wide channel located at 
        the upper river terminus of the River Channel southern river 
        embankment towards the northern river embankment; and
            (3) adjusting the existing turning basin to accommodate 
        those changes.

SEC. 4027. WOONSOCKET LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, 
              RHODE ISLAND.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study, and, not later than June 30, 
2008, submit to Congress a report that describes the results of the 
study, on the flood damage reduction project, Woonsocket, Blackstone 
River Basin, Rhode Island, authorized by the Act of December 22, 1944 
(commonly known as the ``Flood Control Act of 1944'') (58 Stat. 887, 
chapter 665), to determine the measures necessary to restore the level 
of protection of the project as originally designed and constructed.

SEC. 4028. PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT, SAVANNAH RIVER, SOUTH CAROLINA AND 
              GEORGIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall determine the feasibility of 
carrying out projects--
            (1) to improve the Savannah River for navigation and 
        related purposes that may be necessary to support the location 
        of container cargo and other port facilities to be located in 
        Jasper County, South Carolina, in the vicinity of Mile 6 of the 
        Savannah Harbor entrance channel; and
            (2) to remove from the proposed Jasper County port site the 
        easements used by the Corps of Engineers for placement of 
        dredged fill materials for the Savannah Harbor Federal 
        navigation project.
    (b) Factors for Consideration.--In making a determination under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall take into consideration--
            (1) landside infrastructure;
            (2) the provision of any additional dredged material 
        disposal area as a consequence of removing from the proposed 
        Jasper County port site the easements used by the Corps of 
        Engineers for placement of dredged fill materials for the 
        Savannah Harbor Federal navigation project; and
            (3) the results of the proposed bistate compact between the 
        State of Georgia and the State of South Carolina to own, 
        develop, and operate port facilities at the proposed Jasper 
        County port site, as described in the term sheet executed by 
        the Governor of the State of Georgia and the Governor of the 
        State of South Carolina on March 12, 2007.

SEC. 4029. JOHNSON CREEK, ARLINGTON, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a feasibility study to determine the 
technical soundness, economic feasibility, and environmental 
acceptability of the plan prepared by the city of Arlington, Texas, as 
generally described in the report entitled ``Johnson Creek: A Vision of 
Conservation, Arlington, Texas'', dated March 2006.

SEC. 4030. ECOSYSTEM AND HYDROPOWER GENERATION DAMS, VERMONT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
potential to carry out ecosystem restoration and hydropower generation 
at dams in the State of Vermont, including a review of the report of 
the Secretary on the land and water resources of the New England-New 
York region submitted to the President on April 27, 1956 (published as 
Senate Document Number 14, 85th Congress), and other relevant reports.
    (b) Purpose.--The purpose of the study under subsection (a) shall 
be to determine the feasibility of providing water resource 
improvements and small-scale hydropower generation in the State of 
Vermont, including, as appropriate, options for dam restoration, 
hydropower, dam removal, and fish passage enhancement.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to carry 
out this section $500,000, to remain available until expended.

SEC. 4031. EURASIAN MILFOIL.

    Under the authority of section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1958 (33 U.S.C. 610), the Secretary shall carry out a study, at full 
Federal expense, to develop national protocols for the use of the 
Euhrychiopsis lecontei weevil for biological control of Eurasian 
milfoil in the lakes of Vermont and other northern tier States.

SEC. 4032. LAKE CHAMPLAIN CANAL STUDY, VERMONT AND NEW YORK.

    (a) Dispersal Barrier Project.--The Secretary shall determine, at 
full Federal expense, the feasibility of a dispersal barrier project at 
the Lake Champlain Canal.
    (b) Construction, Maintenance, and Operation.--If the Secretary 
determines that the project described in subsection (a) is feasible, 
the Secretary shall construct, maintain, and operate a dispersal 
barrier at the Lake Champlain Canal at full Federal expense.

SEC. 4033. BAKER BAY AND ILWACO HARBOR, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of increased siltation in Baker 
Bay and Ilwaco Harbor, Washington, to determine whether the siltation 
is the result of a Federal navigation project.

SEC. 4034. ELLIOT BAY SEAWALL REHABILITATION STUDY, WASHINGTON.

    The study for the rehabilitation of the Elliot Bay Seawall, 
Seattle, Washington, is modified to direct the Secretary to determine 
the feasibility of reducing future damage to the seawall from seismic 
activity.

SEC. 4035. JOHNSONVILLE DAM, JOHNSONVILLE, WISCONSIN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the Johnsonville Dam, 
Johnsonville, Wisconsin, to determine whether the structure prevents 
ice jams on the Sheboygan River.

SEC. 4036. DEBRIS REMOVAL.

    (a) Reevaluation.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in coordination with the 
        Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and in 
        consultation with affected communities, shall conduct a 
        complete reevaluation of Federal and non-Federal demolition, 
        debris removal, segregation, transportation, and disposal 
        practices relating to disaster areas designated in response to 
        Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (including regulated and 
        nonregulated materials and debris).
            (2) Inclusions.--The reevaluation under paragraph (1) shall 
        include a review of--
                    (A) compliance with all applicable environmental 
                laws;
                    (B) permits issued or required to be issued with 
                respect to debris handling, transportation, storage, or 
                disposal; and
                    (C) administrative actions relating to debris 
                removal and disposal in the disaster areas described in 
                paragraph (1).
    (b) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on the 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a 
report that--
            (1) describes the findings of the Secretary with respect to 
        the reevaluation under subsection (a);
            (2)(A) certifies compliance with all applicable 
        environmental laws; and
            (B) identifies any area in which a violation of such a law 
        has occurred or is occurring;
            (3) includes recommendations to ensure--
                    (A) the protection of the environment;
                    (B) sustainable practices; and
                    (C) the integrity of hurricane and flood protection 
                infrastructure relating to debris disposal practices;
            (4) contains an enforcement plan that is designed to 
        prevent illegal dumping of hurricane debris in a disaster area; 
        and
            (5) contains plans of the Secretary and the Administrator 
        to involve the public and non-Federal interests, including 
        through the formation of a Federal advisory committee, as 
        necessary, to seek public comment relating to the removal, 
        disposal, and planning for the handling of post-hurricane 
        debris.

SEC. 4037. MOHAWK RIVER, ONEIDA COUNTY, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a watershed study of 
the Mohawk River watershed, Oneida County, New York, with a particular 
emphasis on improving water quality and the environment.
    (b) Recommendations.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall take into consideration impacts on the Sauquoit 
Creek Watershed and the economy.

SEC. 4038. WALLA WALLA RIVER BASIN, OREGON AND WASHINGTON.

    In conducting the study to determine the feasibility of carrying 
out a project for ecosystem restoration, Walla Walla River Basin, 
Oregon and Washington, the Secretary shall--
            (1) provide a credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
        cost of the project for the cost of any activity carried out by 
        the non-Federal interest before the date of the partnership 
        agreement for the project, if the Secretary determines that the 
        activity is integral to the project; and
            (2) allow the non-Federal interest to provide the non-
        Federal share of the cost of the study in the form of in-kind 
        services and materials.

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

SEC. 5001. LAKES PROGRAM.

    Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4148; 110 Stat. 3758; 113 Stat. 295) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (18), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (19), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(20) Lake Sakakawea, North Dakota, removal of silt and 
        aquatic growth and measures to address excessive sedimentation;
            ``(21) Lake Morley, Vermont, removal of silt and aquatic 
        growth and measures to address excessive sedimentation;
            ``(22) Lake Fairlee, Vermont, removal of silt and aquatic 
        growth and measures to address excessive sedimentation; and
            ``(23) Lake Rodgers, Creedmoor, North Carolina, removal of 
        silt and excessive nutrients and restoration of structural 
        integrity.''.

SEC. 5002. ESTUARY RESTORATION.

    (a) Purposes.--Section 102 of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 
(33 U.S.C. 2901) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting before the semicolon the 
        following: ``by implementing a coordinated Federal approach to 
        estuary habitat restoration activities, including the use of 
        common monitoring standards and a common system for tracking 
        restoration acreage'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``and implement'' after 
        ``to develop''; and
            (3) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``through cooperative 
        agreements'' after ``restoration projects''.
    (b) Definition of Estuary Habitat Restoration Plan.--Section 
103(6)(A) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2902(6)(A)) 
is amended by striking ``Federal or State'' and inserting ``Federal, 
State, or regional''.
    (c) Estuary Habitat Restoration Program.--Section 104 of the 
Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2903) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``through the award of 
        contracts and cooperative agreements'' after ``assistance'';
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in paragraph (3)(A), by inserting ``or State'' 
                after ``Federal''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (4)(B), by inserting ``or 
                approach'' after ``technology'';
            (3) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)--
                            (i) by striking ``Except'' and inserting 
                        the following:
                            ``(i) In general.--Except''; and
                            (ii) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(ii) Monitoring.--
                                    ``(I) Costs.--The costs of 
                                monitoring an estuary habitat 
                                restoration project funded under this 
                                title may be included in the total cost 
                                of the estuary habitat restoration 
                                project.
                                    ``(II) Goals.--The goals of the 
                                monitoring shall be--
                                            ``(aa) to measure the 
                                        effectiveness of the 
                                        restoration project; and
                                            ``(bb) to allow adaptive 
                                        management to ensure project 
                                        success.'';
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``or approach'' 
                after ``technology''; and
                    (C) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``(including 
                monitoring)'' after ``services'';
            (4) in subsection (f)(1)(B), by inserting ``long-term'' 
        before ``maintenance''; and
            (5) in subsection (g)--
                    (A) by striking ``In carrying'' and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(1) In general.--In carrying''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Small projects.--
                    ``(A) Definition of small project.--In this 
                paragraph, the term `small project' means a project 
                carried out under this title at a Federal cost of less 
                than $1,000,000.
                    ``(B) Small project delegation.--In carrying out 
                this title, the Secretary, upon the recommendation of 
                the Council, may delegate implementation of a small 
                project to--
                            ``(i) the Secretary of the Interior (acting 
                        through the Director of the United States Fish 
                        and Wildlife Service);
                            ``(ii) the Under Secretary for Oceans and 
                        Atmosphere of the Department of Commerce;
                            ``(iii) the Administrator of the 
                        Environmental Protection Agency; or
                            ``(iv) the Secretary of Agriculture.
                    ``(C) Funding.--The implementation of a small 
                project delegated to the head of a Federal department 
                or agency under this paragraph may be carried out 
                using--
                            ``(i) funds appropriated to the department 
                        or agency under section 109(a)(1); or
                            ``(ii) any other funds available to the 
                        department or agency.
                    ``(D) Agreements.--The Federal department or agency 
                to which implementation of a small project is delegated 
                shall enter into an agreement with the non-Federal 
                interest generally in conformance with the criteria in 
                subsections (d) and (e). Cooperative agreements may be 
                used for any delegated project.''.
    (d) Establishment of Estuary Habitat Restoration Council.--Section 
105(b) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2904(b)) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (5), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) cooperating in the implementation of the strategy 
        developed under section 106;
            ``(7) recommending standards for monitoring for restoration 
        projects and contribution of project information to the 
        database developed under section 107; and
            ``(8) otherwise using the respective agency authorities of 
        the Council members to carry out this title.''.
    (e) Monitoring of Estuary Habitat Restoration Projects.--Section 
107(d) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2906(d)) is 
amended by striking ``compile'' and inserting ``have general data 
compilation, coordination, and analysis responsibilities to carry out 
this title and in support of the strategy developed under this section, 
including compilation of''.
    (f) Reporting.--Section 108(a) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 
2000 (33 U.S.C. 2907(a)) is amended by striking ``third and fifth'' and 
inserting ``sixth, eighth, and tenth''.
    (g) Funding.--Section 109(a) of the Estuary Restoration Act of 2000 
(33 U.S.C. 2908(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by 
                striking ``to the Secretary''; and
                    (B) by striking subparagraphs (A) through (D) and 
                inserting the following:
                    ``(A) to the Secretary, $25,000,000 for each of 
                fiscal years 2007 through 2011;
                    ``(B) to the Secretary of the Interior (acting 
                through the Director of the United States Fish and 
                Wildlife Service), $2,500,000 for each of fiscal years 
                2007 through 2011;
                    ``(C) to the Under Secretary for Oceans and 
                Atmosphere of the Department of Commerce, $2,500,000 
                for each of fiscal years 2007 through 2011;
                    ``(D) to the Administrator of the Environmental 
                Protection Agency, $2,500,000 for each of fiscal years 
                2007 through 2011; and
                    ``(E) to the Secretary of Agriculture, $2,500,000 
                for each of fiscal years 2007 through 2011.''; and
            (2) in the first sentence of paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by inserting ``and other information compiled 
                under section 107'' after ``this title''; and
                    (B) by striking ``2005'' and inserting ``2011''.
    (h) General Provisions.--Section 110 of the Estuary Restoration Act 
of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2909) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1)--
                    (A) by inserting ``or contracts'' after 
                ``agreements''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, nongovernmental 
                organizations,'' after ``agencies''; and
            (2) by striking subsections (d) and (e).

SEC. 5003. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE.

    Section 219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334; 113 Stat. 1494; 114 Stat. 
2763A-219) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)(5), by striking ``a project for the 
        elimination or control of combined sewer overflows'' and 
        inserting ``projects for the design, installation, enhancement 
        or repair of sewer systems'';
            (2) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ``$20,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$32,500,000''; and
            (3) in subsection (f)--
                    (A) in paragraph (30), by striking ``$55,000,000'' 
                and inserting ``$75,000,000''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(77) Chattooga county, georgia.--$8,000,000 for waste and 
        drinking water infrastructure improvement, Chattooga County, 
        Georgia.
            ``(78) Albany, georgia.--$4,000,000 storm drainage system, 
        Albany, Georgia.
            ``(79) Moultrie, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water supply 
        infrastructure, Moultrie, Georgia.
            ``(80) Stephens county/city of toccoa, georgia.--$8,000,000 
        water infrastructure improvements, Stephens County/City of 
        Toccoa, Georgia.
            ``(81) Dahlonega, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, Dahlonega, Georgia.
            ``(82) Banks county, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, Banks County, Georgia.
            ``(83) Berrien county, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, Berrien County, Georgia.
            ``(84) City of east point, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, City of East Point, Georgia.
            ``(85) Armuchee valley: chattooga, floyd, gordon, walker, 
        and whitifield counties, georgia.--$10,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, Armuchee Valley: Chattooga, Floyd, 
        Gordon, Walker, and Whitifield Counties, Georgia.
            ``(86) Atchison, kansas.--$20,000,000 for combined sewer 
        overflows, Atchison, Kansas.
            ``(87) Lafourche parish, louisiana.--$2,300,000 for 
        measures to prevent the intrusion of saltwater into the 
        freshwater system, Lafourche Parish, Louisiana.
            ``(88) South central planning and development commission, 
        louisiana.--$2,500,000 for water and wastewater improvements, 
        South Central Planning and Development Commission, Louisiana.
            ``(89) Rapides area planning commission, louisiana.--
        $1,000,000 for water and wastewater improvements, Rapides, 
        Louisiana.
            ``(90) Northwest louisiana council of governments, 
        louisiana.--$2,000,000 for water and wastewater improvements, 
        Northwest Louisiana Council of Governments, Louisiana.
            ``(91) Lafayette, louisiana.--$1,200,000 for water and 
        wastewater improvements, Lafayette, Louisiana.
            ``(92) Lake charles, louisiana.--$1,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater improvements, Lake Charles, Louisiana.
            ``(93) Ouachita parish, louisiana.--$1,000,000 water and 
        wastewater improvements, Ouachita Parish, Louisiana.
            ``(94) Union-lincoln regional water supply project, 
        louisiana.--$2,000,000 for the Union-Lincoln Regional Water 
        Supply project, Louisiana.
            ``(95) Central lake region sanitary district, minnesota.--
        $2,000,000 for sanitary sewer and wastewater infrastructure for 
        the Central Lake Region Sanitary District, Minnesota to serve 
        Le Grande and Moe Townships, Minnesota.
            ``(96) Goodview, minnesota.--$3,000,000 for water quality 
        infrastructure, Goodview, Minnesota.
            ``(97) Grand rapids, minnesota.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Grand Rapids, Minnesota.
            ``(98) Willmar, minnesota.--$15,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Willmar, Minnesota.
            ``(99) City of corinth, mississippi.--$7,500,000 for a 
        surface water program, Corinth, Mississippi.
            ``(100) Clean water coalition, nevada.--$20,000,000 for the 
        Systems Conveyance and Operations Program, Clark County, 
        Henderson, Las Vegas, and North Las Vegas, Nevada.
            ``(101) Town of mooresville, north carolina.--$4,000,000 
        for water and wastewater infrastructure improvements, 
        Mooresville, North Carolina.
            ``(102) City of winston-salem, north carolina.--$3,000,000 
        for storm water upgrades, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
            ``(103) Neuse regional water and sewer authority, north 
        carolina.--$4,000,000 for the Neuse regional drinking water 
        facility, Neuse, North Carolina.
            ``(104) Town of cary/wake county, north carolina.--
        $4,000,000 for a water reclamation facility, Cary, North 
        Carolina.
            ``(105) City of fayetteville, north carolina.--$6,000,000 
        for water and sewer upgrades, Fayetteville, North Carolina.
            ``(106) Washington county, north carolina.--$1,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure, Washington County, North 
        Carolina.
            ``(107) City of charlotte, north carolina.--$3,000,000 for 
        the Briar Creek Relief Sewer project, Charlotte, North 
        Carolina.
            ``(108) City of ada, oklahoma.--$1,700,000 for sewer 
        improvements and other water infrastructure, City Of Ada, 
        Oklahoma.
            ``(109) Norman, oklahoma.--$10,000,000 for carrying out the 
        Waste Water Master Plan and water related infrastructure, 
        Norman, Oklahoma.
            ``(110) Eastern oklahoma state university, wilberton, 
        oklahoma.--$1,000,000 for sewer and utility upgrades and water 
        related infrastructure, Eastern Oklahoma State University, 
        Wilberton, Oklahoma.
            ``(111) City of weatherford, oklahoma.--$500,000 for 
        arsenic program and water related infrastructure, City of 
        Weatherford, Oklahoma.
            ``(112) City of bethany, oklahoma.--$1,500,000 for water 
        improvements and water related infrastructure, City of Bethany, 
        Oklahoma.
            ``(113) Woodward, oklahoma.--$1,500,000 for water 
        improvements and water related infrastructure, Woodward, 
        Oklahoma.
            ``(114) City of disney and langley, oklahoma.--$2,500,000 
        for water and sewer improvements and water related 
        infrastructure, City of Disney and Langley, Oklahoma.
            ``(115) City of durant, oklahoma.--$3,300,000 for bayou 
        restoration and water related infrastructure, City of Durant, 
        Oklahoma.
            ``(116) City of midwest city, oklahoma.--$2,000,000 for 
        improvements to water related infrastructure, City of Midwest 
        City, Oklahoma.
            ``(117) City of ardmore, oklahoma.--$1,900,000 for water 
        and sewer infrastructure improvements, City of Ardmore, 
        Oklahoma.
            ``(118) City of guymon, oklahoma.--$16,000,000 for water 
        related waste water treatment related infrastructure projects.
            ``(119) Lugert-altus irrigation district, altus, 
        oklahoma.--$5,000,000 for water related infrastructure 
        improvement project.
            ``(120) City of chickasha, oklahoma.--$650,000 for 
        industrial park sewer infrastructure project.
            ``(121) Oklahoma panhandle state university, guymon, 
        oklahoma.--$275,000 for water testing facility and water 
        related infrastructure development.
            ``(122) City of bartlesville, oklahoma.--$2,500,000 for 
        waterline transport infrastructure project.
            ``(123) City of konawa, oklahoma.--$500,000 for water 
        treatment infrastructure improvements.
            ``(124) City of mustang, oklahoma.--$3,325,000 for water 
        improvements and water related infrastructure.
            ``(125) City of alva, oklahoma.--$250,000 for waste water 
        improvement infrastructure.
            ``(126) Vinton county, ohio.--$1,000,000 to construct water 
        lines in Vinton and Brown Townships, Ohio.
            ``(127) Burr oak regional water district, ohio.--$4,000,000 
        for construction of a water line to extend from a well field 
        near Chauncey, Ohio, to a water treatment plant near Millfield, 
        Ohio.
            ``(128) Fremont, ohio.--$2,000,000 for construction of off-
        stream water supply reservoir, Fremont, Ohio.
            ``(129) Fostoria, ohio.--$2,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Fostoria, Ohio.
            ``(130) Defiance county, ohio.--$1,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Defiance County, Ohio.
            ``(131) Akron, ohio.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Akron, Ohio
            ``(132) Meigs county, ohio.--$1,000,000 to extend the 
        Tupper Plains Regional Water District water line to Lebanon 
        Township, Ohio.
            ``(133) City of cleveland, ohio.--$2,500,000 for Flats East 
        Bank water and wastewater infrastructure, Cleveland, Ohio.
            ``(134) Cincinnati, ohio.--$1,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Cincinnati, Ohio.
            ``(135) Dayton, ohio.--$1,000,000 for water and wastewater 
        infrastructure, Dayton, Ohio.
            ``(136) Lawrence county, ohio.--$5,000,000 for Union Rome 
        wastewater infrastructure, Lawrence County, Ohio.
            ``(137) City of columbus, ohio.--$4,500,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Columbus, Ohio.
            ``(138) Beaver creek reservoir, pennsylvania.--$3,000,000 
        for projects for water supply and related activities, Beaver 
        Creek Reservoir, Clarion County, Beaver and Salem Townships, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(139) Myrtle beach, south carolina.--$10,000,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure, including ocean outfalls, Myrtle 
        Beach, South Carolina.
            ``(140) Charleston and west ashley, south carolina.--
        $6,000,000 for wastewater tunnel replacement, Charleston and 
        West Ashley, South Carolina.
            ``(141) Charleston, south carolina.--$3,000,000 for 
        stormwater control measures and storm sewer improvements, 
        Spring Street/Fishburne Street drainage project, Charleston, 
        South Carolina.
            ``(142) North myrtle beach, south carolina.--$3,000,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure, including ocean outfalls, North 
        Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
            ``(143) Surfside, south carolina.--$3,000,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure, including stormwater system 
        improvements and ocean outfalls, Surfside, South Carolina.
            ``(144) Cheyenne river sioux reservation (dewey and ziebach 
        counties) and perkins and meade counties, south dakota.--
        $40,000,000 for water related infrastructure, Cheyenne River 
        Sioux Reservation (Dewey and Ziebach counties) and Perkins and 
        Meade Counties, South Dakota.
            ``(145) City of oak ridge, tennessee.--$4,000,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, City of Oak Ridge, 
        Tennessee.
            ``(146) Nashville, tennessee.--$5,000,000 for water supply 
        and wastewater infrastructure, Nashville, Tennessee.
            ``(147) Counties of lewis, lawrence, and wayne, 
        tennessee.--$2,000,000 for water supply and wastewater 
        infrastructure projects in the Counties of Lewis, Lawrence and 
        Wayne, Tennessee.
            ``(148) County of giles, tennessee.--$2,000,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure projects in the County of 
        Giles, Tennessee.
            ``(149) City of knoxville, tennessee.--$5,000,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure projects in the City of 
        Knoxville, Tennessee.
            ``(150) Shelby county, tennessee.--$4,000,000 for water-
        related environmental infrastructure projects in County of 
        Shelby, Tennessee.
            ``(151) Johnson county, tennessee.--$600,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure projects in Johnson 
        County, Tennessee.
            ``(152) Plateau utility district, morgan county, 
        tennessee.--$1,000,000 for water supply and wastewater 
        infrastructure projects in Morgan County, Tennessee.
            ``(153) City of harrogate, tennessee.--$2,000,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure projects in City of 
        Harrogate, Tennessee.
            ``(154) Hamilton county, tennessee.--$500,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure projects in Hamilton 
        County, Tennessee.
            ``(155) Grainger county, tennessee.--$1,250,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure projects in Grainger 
        County, Tennessee.
            ``(156) Claiborne county, tennessee.--$1,250,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure projects in Claiborne 
        County, Tennessee.
            ``(157) Blaine, tennessee.--$500,000 for water supply and 
        wastewater infrastructure projects in Blaine, Tennessee.
            ``(158) Chesapeake bay.--$30,000,000 for environmental 
        infrastructure projects to benefit the Chesapeake Bay, 
        including the nutrient removal project at the Blue Plains 
        Wastewater Treatment facility in Washington, DC.
            ``(159) Arkansas valley conduit, colorado.--$10,000,000 for 
        the Arkansas Valley Conduit, Colorado.
            ``(160) Boulder county, colorado.--$10,000,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure, Boulder County, Colorado.
            ``(161) Plainville, connecticut.--$6,280,000 for wastewater 
        treatment, Plainville, Connecticut.
            ``(162) Southington, connecticut.--$9,420,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure, Southington, Connecticut.
            ``(163) Norwalk, connecticut.--$3,000,000 for the Keeler 
        Brook Storm Water Improvement Project, Norwalk, Connecticut.
            ``(164) Enfield, connecticut.--$1,000,000 for infiltration 
        and inflow correction, Enfield, Connecticut.
            ``(165) New haven, connecticut.--$300,000 for storm water 
        system improvements, New Haven, Connecticut.
            ``(166) Miami-dade county, florida.--$6,250,000 for water 
        reuse supply and a water transmission pipeline, Miami-Dade 
        County, Florida.
            ``(167) Hillsborough county, florida.--$6,250,000 for water 
        infrastructure and supply enhancement, Hillsborough County, 
        Florida.
            ``(168) Palm beach county, florida.--$7,500,000 for water 
        infrastructure, Palm Beach County, Florida.
            ``(169) Chesapeake bay region, maryland and virginia.--
        $40,000,000 for water pollution control projects, Chesapeake 
        Bay Region, Maryland and Virginia.
            ``(170) Michigan combined sewer overflows.--$35,000,000 for 
        correction of combined sewer overflows, Michigan.
            ``(171) Middletown township, new jersey.--$1,100,000 for 
        storm sewer improvements, Middletown Township, New Jersey.
            ``(172) Rahway valley, new jersey.--$25,000,000 for 
        sanitary sewer and storm sewer improvements in the service area 
        of the Rahway Valley Sewerage Authority, New Jersey.
            ``(173) Cranford township, new jersey.--$6,000,000 for 
        storm sewer improvements in Cranford Township, New Jersey.
            ``(174) Yates county, new york.--$5,000,000 for drinking 
        water infrastructure, Yates County, New York.
            ``(175) Village of patchogue, new york.--$5,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Village of Patchogue, New York.
            ``(176) Elmira, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Elmira, New York.
            ``(177) Essex hamlet, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Essex Hamlet, New York.
            ``(178) Niagara falls, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Niagara Falls, New York.
            ``(179) Village of babylon, new york.--$5,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Village of Babylon, New York.
            ``(180) Fleming, new york.--$5,000,000 for drinking water 
        infrastructure, Fleming, New York.
            ``(181) Village of kyrias-joel, new york.--$5,000,000 for 
        drinking water infrastructure, Village of Kyrias-Joel, New 
        York.
            ``(182) Devils lake, north dakota.--$15,000,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure, Devils Lake, North Dakota.
            ``(183) North dakota.--$15,000,000 for water-related 
        infrastructure, North Dakota.
            ``(184) Clark county, nevada.--$50,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Clark County, Nevada.
            ``(185) Washoe county, nevada.--$14,000,000 for 
        construction of water infrastructure improvements to the 
        Huffaker Hills Reservoir Conservation Project, Washoe County, 
        Nevada.
            ``(186) Glendale dam diversion structure, nevada.--
        $10,000,000 for water system improvements to the Glendale Dam 
        Diversion Structure for the Truckee Meadows Water Authority, 
        Nevada.
            ``(187) Reno, nevada.--$13,000,000 for construction of a 
        water conservation project for the Highland Canal, Mogul Bypass 
        in Reno, Nevada.
            ``(188) Los angeles county, california.--$12,000,000 for 
        the planning, design and construction of water-related 
        environmental infrastructure for Santa Monica Bay and the 
        coastal zone of Los Angeles County, California.
            ``(189) Montebello, california.--$4,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements in south Montebello, California.
            ``(190) La mirada, california.--$4,000,000 for the 
        planning, design, and construction of a stormwater program in 
        La Mirada, California.
            ``(191) East palo alto, california.--$4,000,000 for a new 
        pump station and stormwater management and drainage system, 
        East Palo Alto, California.
            ``(192) Port of stockton, stockton, california.--$3,000,000 
        for water and wastewater infrastructure projects for Rough and 
        Ready Island and vicinity, Stockton, California.
            ``(193) Perris, california.--$3,000,000 project for 
        recycled water transmission infrastructure, Eastern Municipal 
        Water District, Perris, California.
            ``(194) Amador county, california.--$3,000,000 for 
        wastewater collection and treatment, Amador County, California.
            ``(195) Calaveras county, california.--$3,000,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater improvement projects in Calaveras County, 
        California, including wastewater reclamation, recycling, and 
        conjunctive use projects.
            ``(196) Santa monica, california.--$3,000,000 for improving 
        water system reliability, Santa Monica, California.
            ``(197) Malibu, california.--$3,000,000 for municipal waste 
        water and recycled water, Malibu Creek Watershed Protection 
        Project, Malibu, California.
            ``(198) Eastern united states.--$29,450,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure in the Eastern United 
        States.
            ``(199) Western united states.--$29,450,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure in the Western United 
        States.''.

SEC. 5004. ALASKA.

    Section 570(h) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 369) is amended by striking ``25,000,000'' and inserting 
``40,000,000''.

SEC. 5005. CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
California.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in California, including projects for wastewater treatment and 
related facilities, water supply and related facilities, environmental 
restoration, and surface water resource protection and development.
    (c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (d) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement entered into 
        under this subsection shall provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the effective 
                long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal 
                interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of 
                the project under this section--
                            (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                            (ii) may be provided in the form of grants 
                        or reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit for the reasonable costs 
                of design work on a project completed by the non-
                Federal interest before entering into a local 
                cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of the costs of a 
                project that is the subject of an agreement under this 
                section, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit 
                for reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of the project costs.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-
                way.--The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                land, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward 
                the non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly-owned or -
                controlled land), but the credit may not exceed 25 
                percent of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.
    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (f) Nonprofit Entity.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any project carried out 
under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit 
entity.
    (g) Expenses of Corps of Engineers.--Not more than 10 percent of 
amounts made available to carry out this section may be used by the 
Corps of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this 
section at Federal expense.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.

SEC. 5006. CONVEYANCE OF OAKLAND INNER HARBOR TIDAL CANAL PROPERTY.

    Section 205 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 
Stat. 4633; 110 Stat. 3748) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 205. CONVEYANCE OF OAKLAND INNER HARBOR TIDAL CANAL PROPERTY.

    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary may convey, without consideration, 
by separate quitclaim deeds, as soon as the conveyance of each 
individual portion is practicable, the title of the United States in 
and to all or portions of the approximately 86 acres of upland, 
tideland, and submerged land, commonly referred to as the `Oakland 
Inner Harbor Tidal Canal,', California (referred to in this section as 
the `Canal Property'), as follows:
            ``(1) To the City of Oakland, the title of the United 
        States in and to all or portions of that part of the Canal 
        Property that are located within the boundaries of the City of 
        Oakland.
            ``(2) To the City of Alameda, or to an entity created by or 
        designated by the City of Alameda that is eligible to hold 
        title to real property, the title of the United States in and 
        to all or portions of that part of the Canal Property that are 
        located within the boundaries of the City of Alameda.
            ``(3) To the adjacent land owners, or to an entity created 
        by or designated by 1 or more of the adjacent landowners that 
        is eligible to hold title to real property, the title of the 
        United States in and to all or portions of that part of the 
        Canal Property that are located within the boundaries of the 
        city in which the adjacent land owners reside.
    ``(b) Requirements.--
            ``(1) Reservations.--The Secretary may reserve and retain 
        from any conveyance under this section a right-of-way or other 
        rights as the Secretary determines to be necessary for the 
        operation and maintenance of the authorized Federal channel in 
        the Canal Property.
            ``(2) Cost.--The conveyances under this section, and the 
        processes involved in the conveyances, shall be at no cost to 
        the United States, except for administrative costs.
    ``(c) Annual Reports.--Until the date on which each conveyance 
described in subsection (a) is complete, the Secretary shall submit, by 
not later than 60 days after the end of each fiscal year, to the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives an 
annual report that describes the efforts of the Secretary to complete 
the conveyances during the preceding fiscal year.''.

SEC. 5007. STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--Unless the Secretary determines, by not later than 
30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, that the relocation of 
the project described in subsection (b) would be injurious to the 
public interest, a non-Federal interest may reconstruct and relocate 
that project approximately 300 feet in a westerly direction.
    (b) Project Description.--
            (1) In general.--The project referred to in subsection (a) 
        is the project for flood control, Calaveras River and 
        Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, California, authorized by 
        section 10 of the Act of December 22, 1944 (commonly known as 
        the ``Flood Control Act of 1944'') (58 Stat. 902).
            (2) Specific description.--The portion of the project to be 
        reconstructed and relocated is that portion consisting of 
        approximately 5.34 acres of dry land levee beginning at a point 
        N. 2203542.3167, E. 6310930.1385, thence running west about 
        59.99 feet to a point N. 2203544.6562, E. 6310870.1468, thence 
        running south about 3,874.99 feet to a point N. 2199669.8760, 
        E. 6310861.7956, thence running east about 60.00 feet to a 
        point N. 2199668.8026, E. 6310921.7900, thence running north 
        about 3,873.73 feet to the point of origin.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
reconstructing and relocating the project described in subsection (b) 
shall be 100 percent.

SEC. 5008. RIO GRANDE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, COLORADO, NEW 
              MEXICO, AND TEXAS.

    (a) Short Title.--This section may be cited as the ``Rio Grande 
Environmental Management Act of 2007''.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Rio grande compact.--The term ``Rio Grande Compact'' 
        means the compact approved by Congress under the Act of May 31, 
        1939 (53 Stat. 785, chapter 155), and ratified by the States.
            (2) Rio grande basin.--The term ``Rio Grande Basin'' means 
        the Rio Grande (including all tributaries and their headwaters) 
        located--
                    (A) in the State of Colorado, from the Rio Grande 
                Reservoir, near Creede, Colorado, to the New Mexico 
                State border;
                    (B) in the State of New Mexico, from the Colorado 
                State border downstream to the Texas State border; and
                    (C) in the State of Texas, from the New Mexico 
                State border to the southern terminus of the Rio Grande 
                at the Gulf of Mexico.
            (3) States.--The term ``States'' means the States of 
        Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas.
    (c) Program Authority.--The Secretary shall carry out, in the Rio 
Grande Basin--
            (1) a program for the planning, construction, and 
        evaluation of measures for fish and wildlife habitat 
        rehabilitation and enhancement; and
            (2) implementation of a long-term monitoring, computerized 
        data inventory and analysis, applied research, and adaptive 
        management program.
    (d) State and Local Consultation and Cooperative Effort.--For the 
purpose of ensuring the coordinated planning and implementation of the 
programs described in subsection (c), the Secretary shall consult with 
the States and other appropriate entities in the States the rights and 
interests of which might be affected by specific program activities.
    (e) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) In general.--
                    (A) Projects on federal land.--Each project under 
                this section located on Federal land shall be carried 
                out at full Federal expense.
                    (B) Other projects.--For each project under 
                subsection (c)(1) located on non-Federal land, the non-
                Federal share of the cost of the project--
                            (i) shall be 35 percent;
                            (ii) may be provided through in-kind 
                        services or direct cash contributions; and
                            (iii) shall include the provision of 
                        necessary land, easements, relocations, and 
                        disposal sites.
    (f) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), with the consent of the 
affected local government, a nonprofit entity may be included as a non-
Federal interest for any project carried out under subsection (c)(1).
    (g) Effect on Other Law.--
            (1) Water law.--Nothing in this section preempts any State 
        water law.
            (2) Compacts and decrees.--In carrying out this section, 
        the Secretary shall comply with the Rio Grande Compact, and any 
        applicable court decrees or Federal and State laws, affecting 
        water or water rights in the Rio Grande Basin.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $15,000,000 for 
each of fiscal years 2008 through 2011.

SEC. 5009. DELMARVA CONSERVATION CORRIDOR, DELAWARE AND MARYLAND.

    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide technical assistance to 
the Secretary of Agriculture for use in carrying out the Conservation 
Corridor Demonstration Program established under subtitle G of title II 
of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (16 U.S.C. 3801 
note; 116 Stat. 275).
    (b) Coordination and Integration.--In carrying out water resources 
projects in the States on the Delmarva Peninsula, the Secretary shall 
coordinate and integrate those projects, to the maximum extent 
practicable, with any activities carried out to implement a 
conservation corridor plan approved by the Secretary of Agriculture 
under section 2602 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 
2002 (16 U.S.C. 3801 note; 116 Stat. 275).

SEC. 5010. SUSQUEHANNA, DELAWARE, AND POTOMAC RIVER BASINS, DELAWARE, 
              MARYLAND, PENNSYLVANIA, AND VIRGINIA.

    (a) Ex Officio Member.--Notwithstanding section 3001(a) of the 1997 
Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery From Natural 
Disasters, and for Overseas Peacekeeping Efforts, Including Those in 
Bosnia (111 Stat. 176) and sections 2.2 of the Susquehanna River Basin 
Compact (Public Law 91-575) and the Delaware River Basin Compact 
(Public Law 87-328), beginning in fiscal year 2002, and each fiscal 
year thereafter, the Division Engineer, North Atlantic Division, Corps 
of Engineers--
            (1) shall be--
                    (A) the ex officio United States member under the 
                Susquehanna River Basin Compact and the Delaware River 
                Basin Compact; and
                    (B) 1 of the 3 members appointed by the President 
                under the Potomac River Basin Compact;
            (2) shall serve without additional compensation; and
            (3) may designate an alternate member in accordance with 
        the terms of those compacts.
    (b) Authorization to Allocate.--The Secretary shall allocate funds 
to the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, Delaware River Basin 
Commission, and the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 
(Potomac River Basin Compact (Public Law 91-407)) to fulfill the 
equitable funding requirements of the respective interstate compacts.
    (c) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Delaware River Basin.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an 
        agreement with the Delaware River Basin Commission to provide 
        temporary water supply and conservation storage at the Francis 
        E. Walter Dam, Pennsylvania, for any period during which the 
        Commission has determined that a drought warning or drought 
        emergency exists.
            (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that the cost 
        for water supply and conservation storage under paragraph (1) 
        shall not exceed the incremental operating costs associated 
        with providing the storage.
    (d) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Susquehanna River 
Basin.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an 
        agreement with the Susquehanna River Basin Commission to 
        provide temporary water supply and conservation storage at 
        Federal facilities operated by the Corps of Engineers in the 
        Susquehanna River Basin, during any period in which the 
        Commission has determined that a drought warning or drought 
        emergency exists.
            (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that the cost 
        for water supply and conservation storage under paragraph (1) 
        shall not exceed the incremental operating costs associated 
        with providing the storage.
    (e) Water Supply and Conservation Storage, Potomac River Basin.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an 
        agreement with the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River 
        Basin to provide temporary water supply and conservation 
        storage at Federal facilities operated by the Corps of 
        Engineers in the Potomac River Basin for any period during 
        which the Commission has determined that a drought warning or 
        drought emergency exists.
            (2) Limitation.--The agreement shall provide that the cost 
        for water supply and conservation storage under paragraph (1) 
        shall not exceed the incremental operating costs associated 
        with providing the storage.

SEC. 5011. ANACOSTIA RIVER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND MARYLAND.

    (a) Comprehensive Action Plan.--Not later than 2 years after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in coordination with the 
Mayor of the District of Columbia, the Governor of Maryland, the county 
executives of Montgomery County and Prince George's County, Maryland, 
and other stakeholders, shall develop and make available to the public 
a 10-year comprehensive action plan to provide for the restoration and 
protection of the ecological integrity of the Anacostia River and its 
tributaries.
    (b) Public Availability.--On completion of the comprehensive action 
plan under subsection (a), the Secretary shall make the plan available 
to the public.

SEC. 5012. BIG CREEK, GEORGIA, WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AND RESTORATION 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, acting through the Chief of 
Engineers, is authorized to cooperate with, by providing technical, 
planning, and construction assistance to, the city of Roswell, Georgia, 
as local sponsor and coordinator with other local governments in the 
Big Creek watershed, Georgia, to assess the quality and quantity of 
water resources, conduct comprehensive watershed management planning, 
develop and implement water efficiency technologies and programs, and 
plan, design, and construct water resource facilities to restore the 
watershed.
    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
under this section--
            (1) shall be 65 percent; and
            (2) may be provided in any combination of cash and in-kind 
        services.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--here is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary $5,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 5013. METROPOLITAN NORTH GEORGIA WATER PLANNING DISTRICT.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in north Georgia, including projects for wastewater treatment 
and related facilities, elimination or control of combined sewer 
overflows, water supply and related facilities, environmental 
restoration, and surface water resource protection and development.
    (c) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (d) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
        agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
        into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the effective 
                long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal 
                interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of project costs 
                under each local cooperation agreement entered into 
                under this subsection--
                            (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                            (ii) may be in the form of grants or 
                        reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit, not to exceed 6 percent 
                of the total construction costs of the project, for the 
                reasonable costs of design work completed by the non-
                Federal interest before entering into a local 
                cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of the costs of a 
                project that is the subject of an agreement under this 
                section, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit 
                for reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of the project costs.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-
                way.--The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                land, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward 
                the non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly-owned or -
                controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
                project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.
    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 5014. IDAHO, MONTANA, RURAL NEVADA, NEW MEXICO, RURAL UTAH, AND 
              WYOMING.

    Section 595 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 383; 117 Stat. 139; 117 Stat. 142; 117 Stat. 1836; 118 Stat. 440) 
is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``and rural utah'' 
        and inserting ``rural utah, and wyoming'';
            (2) in subsections (b) and (c), by striking ``and rural 
        Utah'' each place it appears and inserting ``rural Utah, and 
        Wyoming''; and
            (3) by amending subsection (h) to read as follows:
    ``(h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section for the period beginning with 
fiscal year 2001 $150,000,000 for rural Nevada, and $25,000,000 for 
each of Montana and New Mexico, $55,000,000 for Idaho, $50,000,000 for 
rural Utah, and $30,000,000 for Wyoming, to remain available until 
expended.''.

SEC. 5015. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIERS PROJECT, 
              ILLINOIS.

    (a) Treatment as Single Project.--The Chicago Sanitary and Ship 
Canal Dispersal Barrier Project (Barrier I) (as in existence on the 
date of enactment of this Act), constructed as a demonstration project 
under section 1202(i)(3) of the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance 
Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 4722(i)(3)), and Barrier 
II, as authorized by section 345 of the District of Columbia 
Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-335; 118 Stat. 1352), shall be 
considered to constitute a single project.
    (b) Authorization.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, acting through the Chief of 
        Engineers, is authorized and directed, at full Federal 
        expense--
                    (A) to upgrade and make permanent Barrier I;
                    (B) to construct Barrier II, notwithstanding the 
                project cooperation agreement with the State of 
                Illinois dated June 14, 2005;
                    (C) to operate and maintain Barrier I and Barrier 
                II as a system to optimize effectiveness;
                    (D) to conduct, in consultation with appropriate 
                Federal, State, local, and nongovernmental entities, a 
                study of a full range of options and technologies for 
                reducing impacts of hazards that may reduce the 
                efficacy of the Barriers; and
                    (E) to provide to each State a credit in an amount 
                equal to the amount of funds contributed by the State 
                toward Barrier II.
            (2) Use of credit.--A State may apply a credit received 
        under paragraph (1)(E) to any cost sharing responsibility for 
        an existing or future Federal project with the Corps of 
        Engineers in the State.
    (c) Feasibility Study.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
appropriate Federal, State, local, and nongovernmental entities, shall 
conduct a feasibility study, at full Federal expense, of the range of 
options and technologies available to prevent the spread of aquatic 
nuisance species between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River Basins 
and through the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and other aquatic 
pathways.
    (d) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Nonindigenous aquatic nuisance prevention and 
        control.--Section 1202(i)(3)(C) of the Nonindigenous Aquatic 
        Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 
        4722(i)(3)(C)), is amended by striking ``, to carry out this 
        paragraph, $750,000'' and inserting ``such sums as are 
        necessary to carry out the dispersal barrier demonstration 
        project under this paragraph''.
            (2) Barrier ii authorization.--Section 345 of the District 
        of Columbia Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-335; 118 
        Stat. 1352), is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 345. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIER, 
              ILLINOIS.

    ``There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are 
necessary to carry out the Barrier II project of the project for the 
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier, Illinois, initiated 
pursuant to section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 2294 note; 100 Stat. 4251).''.

SEC. 5016. MISSOURI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MITIGATION, RECOVERY AND 
              RESTORATION, IOWA, KANSAS, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEBRASKA, 
              NORTH DAKOTA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND WYOMING.

    (a) Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        Missouri River Recovery and Implementation Committee 
        established by subsection (b)(1), shall conduct a study of the 
        Missouri River and its tributaries to determine actions 
        required--
                    (A) to mitigate losses of aquatic and terrestrial 
                habitat;
                    (B) to recover federally listed species under the 
                Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
                    (C) to restore the ecosystem to prevent further 
                declines among other native species.
            (2) Funding.--The study under paragraph (1) shall be funded 
        under the Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Program.
    (b) Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee.--
            (1) Establishment.--Not later than June 31, 2006, the 
        Secretary shall establish a committee to be known as the 
        ``Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee'' (referred 
        to in this section as the ``Committee'').
            (2) Membership.--The Committee shall include 
        representatives from--
                    (A) Federal agencies;
                    (B) States located near the Missouri River Basin; 
                and
                    (C) other appropriate entities, as determined by 
                the Secretary, including--
                            (i) water management and fish and wildlife 
                        agencies;
                            (ii) Indian tribes located near the 
                        Missouri River Basin; and
                            (iii) nongovernmental stakeholders.
            (3) Duties.--The Commission shall--
                    (A) with respect to the study under subsection (a), 
                provide guidance to the Secretary and any other 
                affected Federal agency, State agency, or Indian tribe;
                    (B) provide guidance to the Secretary with respect 
                to the Missouri River recovery and mitigation program 
                in existence on the date of enactment of this Act, 
                including recommendations relating to--
                            (i) changes to the implementation strategy 
                        from the use of adaptive management; and
                            (ii) the coordination of the development of 
                        consistent policies, strategies, plans, 
                        programs, projects, activities, and priorities 
                        for the program;
                    (C) exchange information regarding programs, 
                projects, and activities of the agencies and entities 
                represented on the Committee to promote the goals of 
                the Missouri River recovery and mitigation program;
                    (D) establish such working groups as the Committee 
                determines to be necessary to assist in carrying out 
                the duties of the Committee, including duties relating 
                to public policy and scientific issues;
                    (E) facilitate the resolution of interagency and 
                intergovernmental conflicts between entities 
                represented on the Committee associated with the 
                Missouri River recovery and mitigation program;
                    (F) coordinate scientific and other research 
                associated with the Missouri River recovery and 
                mitigation program; and
                    (G) annually prepare a work plan and associated 
                budget requests.
            (4) Compensation; travel expenses.--
                    (A) Compensation.--Members of the Committee shall 
                not receive compensation from the Secretary in carrying 
                out the duties of the Committee under this section.
                    (B) Travel expenses.--Travel expenses incurred by a 
                member of the Committee in carrying out the duties of 
                the Committee under this section shall be paid by the 
                agency, Indian tribe, or unit of government represented 
                by the member.
    (c) Nonapplicability of FACA.--The Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the Committee.

SEC. 5017. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA REGION, LOUISIANA.

    (a) Definition of Southeast Louisiana Region.--In this section, the 
term ``Southeast Louisiana Region'' means any of the following parishes 
and municipalities in the State of Louisiana:
            (1) Orleans.
            (2) Jefferson.
            (3) St. Tammany.
            (4) Tangipahoa.
            (5) St. Bernard.
            (6) St. Charles.
            (7) St. John.
            (8) Plaquemines.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the Southeast Louisiana Region.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may 
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in the Southeast Louisiana Region, including projects for 
wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply and related 
facilities, environmental restoration, and surface water resource 
protection and development (including projects to improve water quality 
in the Lake Pontchartrain Basin).
    (d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
    (e) Partnership Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement of a project 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the effective 
                long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal 
                interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
        project under this section--
                    (A) shall be 75 percent; and
                    (B) may be provided in the form of grants or 
                reimbursements of project costs.
                    (C) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit, not to exceed 6 percent 
                of the total construction costs of the project, for the 
                reasonable costs of design work completed by the non-
                Federal interest before entering into a local 
                cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project.
                    (D) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of the costs of a 
                project that is the subject of an agreement under this 
                section, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit 
                for reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of the project costs.
                    (E) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-
                way.--The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                land, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward 
                the non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly-owned or -
                controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
                project costs.
                    (F) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Nonprofit Entity.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any project carried out 
under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit 
entity.
    (h) Expenses of Corps of Engineers.--Not more than 10 percent of 
amounts made available to carry out this section may be used by the 
Corps of Engineers district offices to administer projects under this 
section at Federal expense.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $17,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 5018. MISSISSIPPI.

    Section 592(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 380; 117 Stat. 1837) is amended by striking ``$100,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$110,000,000''.

SEC. 5019. ST. MARY PROJECT, BLACKFEET RESERVATION, MONTANA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with the Bureau of 
Reclamation, shall conduct all necessary studies, develop an emergency 
response plan, provide technical and planning and design assistance, 
and rehabilitate and construct the St. Mary Diversion and Conveyance 
Works project located within the exterior boundaries of the Blackfeet 
Reservation in the State of Montana, at a total cost of $140,000,000.
    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the total cost of the 
project under this section shall be 75 percent.
    (c) Participation by Blackfeet Tribe and Fort Belknap Indian 
Community.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), no 
        construction shall be carried out under this section until the 
        earlier of--
                    (A) the date on which Congress approves the 
                reserved water rights settlements of the Blackfeet 
                Tribe and the Fort Belknap Indian Community; and
                    (B) January 1, 2011.
            (2) Exception.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect 
        to construction relating to--
                    (A) standard operation and maintenance; or
                    (B) emergency repairs to ensure water 
                transportation or the protection of life and property.
            (3) Requirement.--The Blackfeet Tribe shall be a 
        participant in all phases of the project authorized by this 
        section.

SEC. 5020. LOWER PLATTE RIVER WATERSHED RESTORATION, NEBRASKA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, acting through the Chief of 
Engineers, may cooperate with and provide assistance to the Lower 
Platte River natural resources districts in the State of Nebraska to 
serve as local sponsors with respect to--
            (1) conducting comprehensive watershed planning in the 
        natural resource districts;
            (2) assessing water resources in the natural resource 
        districts; and
            (3) providing project feasibility planning, design, and 
        construction assistance for water resource and watershed 
        management in the natural resource districts, including 
        projects for environmental restoration and flood damage 
        reduction.
    (b) Funding.--
            (1) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
        carrying out an activity described in subsection (a) shall be 
        65 percent.
            (2) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
        of carrying out an activity described in subsection (a)--
                    (A) shall be 35 percent; and
                    (B) may be provided in cash or in-kind.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $12,000,000.

SEC. 5021. NORTH CAROLINA.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the State of North Carolina.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for environmental 
infrastructure and resource protection and development projects in 
North Carolina, including projects for--
            (1) wastewater treatment and related facilities;
            (2) combined sewer overflow, water supply, storage, 
        treatment, and related facilities;
            (3) drinking water infrastructure including treatment and 
        related facilities;
            (4) environmental restoration;
            (5) storm water infrastructure; and
            (6) surface water resource protection and development.
    (c) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (d) Project Cooperation Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a project cooperation 
        agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each project cooperation agreement 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities development plan or resource 
                protection plan, including appropriate plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the effective 
                long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal 
                interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of 
                the project under this section--
                            (i) shall be 75 percent; and
                            (ii) may be provided in the form of grants 
                        or reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit, not to exceed 6 percent 
                of the total construction costs of the project, for the 
                reasonable costs of design work completed by the non-
                Federal interest before entering into a local 
                cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of the costs of a 
                project that is the subject of an agreement under this 
                section, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit 
                for reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of the project costs.
                    (D) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-
                way.--The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                land, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward 
                the non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly-owned or -
                controlled land).
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.
    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $13,000,000.

SEC. 5022. OHIO RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Ohio river basin.--The term ``Ohio River Basin'' means 
        the Ohio River, its backwaters, its side channels, and all 
        tributaries (including their watersheds) that drain into the 
        Ohio River and encompassing areas of any of the States of 
        Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Illinois, 
        New York, and Virginia.
            (2) Compact.--The term ``Compact'' means the Ohio River 
        Watershed Sanitation Commission flood and pollution control 
        compact between the States of Indiana, West Virginia, Ohio, 
        Kentucky, Pennsylvania, New York, Illinois, and Virginia, 
        approved by Congress in 1936 pursuant to the first section of 
        the Act of June 8, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 567a), and chartered in 
        1948.
    (b) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide planning, design, and 
construction assistance to the Compact for the improvement of the 
quality of the environment in and along the Ohio River Basin.
    (c) Priorities.--In providing assistance under this section, the 
Secretary shall give priority to reducing or eliminating the presence 
of organic pollutants in the Ohio River Basin through the renovation 
and technological improvement of the organic detection system 
monitoring stations along the Ohio River in the States of Indiana, 
Ohio, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,500,000.

SEC. 5023. STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE WATER PLANNING, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide technical assistance 
for the development of updates of the Oklahoma Comprehensive Water 
Plan.
    (b) Technical Assistance.--Technical assistance provided under 
subsection (a) may include--
            (1) acquisition of hydrologic data, groundwater 
        characterization, database development, and data distribution;
            (2) expansion of surface water and groundwater monitoring 
        networks;
            (3) assessment of existing water resources, surface water 
        storage, and groundwater storage potential;
            (4) numerical analysis and modeling necessary to provide an 
        integrated understanding of water resources and water 
        management options;
            (5) participation in State planning forums and planning 
        groups;
            (6) coordination of Federal water management planning 
        efforts; and
            (7) technical review of data, models, planning scenarios, 
        and water plans developed by the State.
    (c) Allocation.--The Secretary shall allocate, subject to the 
availability of appropriations, $6,500,000 to provide technical 
assistance and for the development of updates of the Oklahoma 
Comprehensive water plan.
    (d) Cost Sharing Requirement.--The non-Federal share of the total 
cost of any activity carried out under this section--
            (1) shall be 25 percent; and
            (2) may be in the form of cash or any in-kind services that 
        the Secretary determines would contribute substantially toward 
        the conduct and completion of the activity assisted.

SEC. 5024. CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE, AND 
              TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    (a) Disbursement Provisions of State of South Dakota and Cheyenne 
River Sioux Tribe and Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife 
Habitat Restoration Trust Funds.--Section 602(a)(4) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 386) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) in clause (i), by inserting ``and the Secretary 
                of the Treasury'' after ``Secretary''; and
                    (B) by striking clause (ii) and inserting the 
                following:
                            ``(ii) Availability of funds.--On 
                        notification in accordance with clause (i), the 
                        Secretary of the Treasury shall make available 
                        to the State of South Dakota funds from the 
                        State of South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife 
                        Habitat Restoration Trust Fund established 
                        under section 603, to be used to carry out the 
                        plan for terrestrial wildlife habitat 
                        restoration submitted by the State of South 
                        Dakota after the State certifies to the 
                        Secretary of the Treasury that the funds to be 
                        disbursed will be used in accordance with 
                        section 603(d)(3) and only after the Trust Fund 
                        is fully capitalized.''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking clause (ii) and 
        inserting the following:
                            ``(ii) Availability of funds.--On 
                        notification in accordance with clause (i), the 
                        Secretary of the Treasury shall make available 
                        to the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower 
                        Brule Sioux Tribe funds from the Cheyenne River 
                        Sioux Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration 
                        Trust Fund and the Lower Brule Sioux 
                        Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust 
                        Fund, respectively, established under section 
                        604, to be used to carry out the plans for 
                        terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration 
                        submitted by the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and 
                        the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, respectively, 
                        after the respective tribe certifies to the 
                        Secretary of the Treasury that the funds to be 
                        disbursed will be used in accordance with 
                        section 604(d)(3) and only after the Trust Fund 
                        is fully capitalized.''.
    (b) Investment Provisions of State of South Dakota Terrestrial 
Wildlife Restoration Trust Fund.--Section 603 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 388) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:
    ``(c) Investments.--
            ``(1) Eligible obligations.--Notwithstanding any other 
        provision of law, the Secretary of the Treasury shall invest 
        the amounts deposited under subsection (b) and the interest 
        earned on those amounts only in interest-bearing obligations of 
        the United States issued directly to the Fund.
            ``(2) Investment requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury 
                shall invest the Fund in accordance with all of the 
                requirements of this paragraph.
                    ``(B) Separate investments of principal and 
                interest.--
                            ``(i) Principal account.--The amounts 
                        deposited in the Fund under subsection (b) 
                        shall be credited to an account within the Fund 
                        (referred to in this paragraph as the 
                        `principal account') and invested as provided 
                        in subparagraph (C).
                            ``(ii) Interest account.--The interest 
                        earned from investing amounts in the principal 
                        account of the Fund shall be transferred to a 
                        separate account within the Fund (referred to 
                        in this paragraph as the `interest account') 
                        and invested as provided in subparagraph (D).
                            ``(iii) Crediting.--The interest earned 
                        from investing amounts in the interest account 
                        of the Fund shall be credited to the interest 
                        account.
                    ``(C) Investment of principal account.--
                            ``(i) Initial investment.--Each amount 
                        deposited in the principal account of the Fund 
                        shall be invested initially in eligible 
                        obligations having the shortest maturity then 
                        available until the date on which the amount is 
                        divided into 3 substantially equal portions and 
                        those portions are invested in eligible 
                        obligations that are identical (except for 
                        transferability) to the next-issued publicly 
                        issued Treasury obligations having a 2-year 
                        maturity, a 5-year maturity, and a 10-year 
                        maturity, respectively.
                            ``(ii) Subsequent investment.--As each 2-
                        year, 5-year, and 10-year eligible obligation 
                        matures, the principal of the maturing eligible 
                        obligation shall also be invested initially in 
                        the shortest-maturity eligible obligation then 
                        available until the principal is reinvested 
                        substantially equally in the eligible 
                        obligations that are identical (except for 
                        transferability) to the next-issued publicly 
                        issued Treasury obligations having 2-year, 5-
                        year, and 10-year maturities.
                            ``(iii) Discontinuance of issuance of 
                        obligations.--If the Department of the Treasury 
                        discontinues issuing to the public obligations 
                        having 2-year, 5-year, or 10-year maturities, 
                        the principal of any maturing eligible 
                        obligation shall be reinvested substantially 
                        equally in eligible obligations that are 
                        identical (except for transferability) to the 
                        next-issued publicly issued Treasury 
                        obligations of the maturities longer than 1 
                        year then available.
                    ``(D) Investment of interest account.--
                            ``(i) Before full capitalization.--Until 
                        the date on which the Fund is fully 
                        capitalized, amounts in the interest account of 
                        the Fund shall be invested in eligible 
                        obligations that are identical (except for 
                        transferability) to publicly issued Treasury 
                        obligations that have maturities that coincide, 
                        to the maximum extent practicable, with the 
                        date on which the Fund is expected to be fully 
                        capitalized.
                            ``(ii) After full capitalization.--On and 
                        after the date on which the Fund is fully 
                        capitalized, amounts in the interest account of 
                        the Fund shall be invested and reinvested in 
                        eligible obligations having the shortest 
                        maturity then available until the amounts are 
                        withdrawn and transferred to fund the 
                        activities authorized under subsection (d)(3).
                    ``(E) Par purchase price.--The price to be paid for 
                eligible obligations purchased as investments of the 
                principal account shall not exceed the par value of the 
                obligations so that the amount of the principal account 
                shall be preserved in perpetuity.
                    ``(F) Highest yield.--Among eligible obligations 
                having the same maturity and purchase price, the 
                obligation to be purchased shall be the obligation 
                having the highest yield.
                    ``(G) Holding to maturity.--Eligible obligations 
                purchased shall generally be held to their maturities.
            ``(3) Annual review of investment activities.--Not less 
        frequently than once each calendar year, the Secretary of the 
        Treasury shall review with the State of South Dakota the 
        results of the investment activities and financial status of 
        the Fund during the preceding 12-month period.
            ``(4) Audits.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The activities of the State of 
                South Dakota (referred to in this subsection as the 
                `State') in carrying out the plan of the State for 
                terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration under section 
                602(a) shall be audited as part of the annual audit 
                that the State is required to prepare under the Office 
                of Management and Budget Circular A-133 (or a successor 
                circulation).
                    ``(B) Determination by auditors.--An auditor that 
                conducts an audit under subparagraph (A) shall--
                            ``(i) determine whether funds received by 
                        the State under this section during the period 
                        covered by the audit were used to carry out the 
                        plan of the State in accordance with this 
                        section; and
                            ``(ii) include the determination under 
                        clause (i) in the written findings of the 
                        audit.
            ``(5) Modification of investment requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--If the Secretary of the Treasury 
                determines that meeting the requirements under 
                paragraph (2) with respect to the investment of a Fund 
                is not practicable, or would result in adverse 
                consequences for the Fund, the Secretary shall modify 
                the requirements, as the Secretary determines to be 
                necessary.
                    ``(B) Consultation.--Before modifying a requirement 
                under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of the Treasury 
                shall consult with the State regarding the proposed 
                modification.'';
            (2) in subsection (d)(2), by inserting ``of the Treasury'' 
        after Secretary''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:
    ``(f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, to the Secretary of the Treasury, to pay expenses 
associated with investing the Fund and auditing the uses of amounts 
withdrawn from the Fund--
            ``(1) up to $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 and 
        2007; and
            ``(2) such sums as are necessary for each subsequent fiscal 
        year.''.
    (c) Investment Provisions for Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Lower 
Brule Sioux Tribe Trust Funds.--Section 604 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 389) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:
    ``(c) Investments.--
            ``(1) Eligible obligations.--Notwithstanding any other 
        provision of law, the Secretary of the Treasury shall invest 
        the amounts deposited under subsection (b) and the interest 
        earned on those amounts only in interest-bearing obligations of 
        the United States issued directly to the Funds.
            ``(2) Investment requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury 
                shall invest each of the Funds in accordance with all 
                of the requirements of this paragraph.
                    ``(B) Separate investments of principal and 
                interest.--
                            ``(i) Principal account.--The amounts 
                        deposited in each Fund under subsection (b) 
                        shall be credited to an account within the Fund 
                        (referred to in this paragraph as the 
                        `principal account') and invested as provided 
                        in subparagraph (C).
                            ``(ii) Interest account.--The interest 
                        earned from investing amounts in the principal 
                        account of each Fund shall be transferred to a 
                        separate account within the Fund (referred to 
                        in this paragraph as the `interest account') 
                        and invested as provided in subparagraph (D).
                            ``(iii) Crediting.--The interest earned 
                        from investing amounts in the interest account 
                        of each Fund shall be credited to the interest 
                        account.
                    ``(C) Investment of principal account.--
                            ``(i) Initial investment.--Each amount 
                        deposited in the principal account of each Fund 
                        shall be invested initially in eligible 
                        obligations having the shortest maturity then 
                        available until the date on which the amount is 
                        divided into 3 substantially equal portions and 
                        those portions are invested in eligible 
                        obligations that are identical (except for 
                        transferability) to the next-issued publicly 
                        issued Treasury obligations having a 2-year 
                        maturity, a 5-year maturity, and a 10-year 
                        maturity, respectively.
                            ``(ii) Subsequent investment.--As each 2-
                        year, 5-year, and 10-year eligible obligation 
                        matures, the principal of the maturing eligible 
                        obligation shall also be invested initially in 
                        the shortest-maturity eligible obligation then 
                        available until the principal is reinvested 
                        substantially equally in the eligible 
                        obligations that are identical (except for 
                        transferability) to the next-issued publicly 
                        issued Treasury obligations having 2-year, 5-
                        year, and 10-year maturities.
                            ``(iii) Discontinuation of issuance of 
                        obligations.--If the Department of the Treasury 
                        discontinues issuing to the public obligations 
                        having 2-year, 5-year, or 10-year maturities, 
                        the principal of any maturing eligible 
                        obligation shall be reinvested substantially 
                        equally in eligible obligations that are 
                        identical (except for transferability) to the 
                        next-issued publicly issued Treasury 
                        obligations of the maturities longer than 1 
                        year then available.
                    ``(D) Investment of the interest account.--
                            ``(i) Before full capitalization.--Until 
                        the date on which each Fund is fully 
                        capitalized, amounts in the interest account of 
                        the Fund shall be invested in eligible 
                        obligations that are identical (except for 
                        transferability) to publicly issued Treasury 
                        obligations that have maturities that coincide, 
                        to the maximum extent practicable, with the 
                        date on which the Fund is expected to be fully 
                        capitalized.
                            ``(ii) After full capitalization.--On and 
                        after the date on which each Fund is fully 
                        capitalized, amounts in the interest account of 
                        the Fund shall be invested and reinvested in 
                        eligible obligations having the shortest 
                        maturity then available until the amounts are 
                        withdrawn and transferred to fund the 
                        activities authorized under subsection (d)(3).
                    ``(E) Par purchase price.--The price to be paid for 
                eligible obligations purchased as investments of the 
                principal account shall not exceed the par value of the 
                obligations so that the amount of the principal account 
                shall be preserved in perpetuity.
                    ``(F) Highest yield.--Among eligible obligations 
                having the same maturity and purchase price, the 
                obligation to be purchased shall be the obligation 
                having the highest yield.
                    ``(G) Holding to maturity.--Eligible obligations 
                purchased shall generally be held to their maturities.
            ``(3) Annual review of investment activities.--Not less 
        frequently than once each calendar year, the Secretary of the 
        Treasury shall review with the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and 
        the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe (referred to in this subsection as 
        the `Tribes') the results of the investment activities and 
        financial status of the Funds during the preceding 12-month 
        period.
            ``(4) Audits.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The activities of the Tribes in 
                carrying out the plans of the Tribes for terrestrial 
                wildlife habitat restoration under section 602(a) shall 
                be audited as part of the annual audit that the Tribes 
                are required to prepare under the Office of Management 
                and Budget Circular A-133 (or a successor circulation).
                    ``(B) Determination by auditors.--An auditor that 
                conducts an audit under subparagraph (A) shall--
                            ``(i) determine whether funds received by 
                        the Tribes under this section during the period 
                        covered by the audit were used to carry out the 
                        plan of the appropriate Tribe in accordance 
                        with this section; and
                            ``(ii) include the determination under 
                        clause (i) in the written findings of the 
                        audit.
            ``(5) Modification of investment requirements.--
                    ``(A) In general.--If the Secretary of the Treasury 
                determines that meeting the requirements under 
                paragraph (2) with respect to the investment of a Fund 
                is not practicable, or would result in adverse 
                consequences for the Fund, the Secretary shall modify 
                the requirements, as the Secretary determines to be 
                necessary.
                    ``(B) Consultation.--Before modifying a requirement 
                under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of the Treasury 
                shall consult with the Tribes regarding the proposed 
                modification.''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:
    ``(f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, to the Secretary of the Treasury to pay expenses 
associated with investing the Funds and auditing the uses of amounts 
withdrawn from the Funds--
            ``(1) up to $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 and 
        2007; and
            ``(2) such sums as are necessary for each subsequent fiscal 
        year.''.

SEC. 5025. TEXAS.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
the State of Texas.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of planning, design, and construction assistance for water-
related environmental infrastructure and resource protection and 
development projects in Texas, including projects for water supply, 
storage, treatment, and related facilities, water quality protection, 
wastewater treatment, and related facilities, environmental 
restoration, and surface water resource protection, and development, as 
identified by the Texas Water Development Board.
    (c) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (d) Partnership Agreements.--Before providing assistance under this 
section, the Secretary shall enter into a partnership agreement with a 
non-Federal interest.
    (e) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
        project under this section--
                    (A) shall be 75 percent; and
                    (B) may be provided in the form of grants or 
                reimbursements of project costs.
            (2) In-kind services.--The non-Federal share may be 
        provided in the form of materials and in-kind services, 
        including planning, design, construction, and management 
        services, as the Secretary determines to be compatible with, 
        and necessary for, the project.
            (3) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
        completed by the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
        local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project.
            (4) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
        non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs.
            (5) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

SEC. 5026. CONNECTICUT RIVER DAMS, VERMONT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate, design, and 
construct structural modifications at full Federal cost to the Union 
Village Dam (Ompompanoosuc River), North Hartland Dam (Ottauquechee 
River), North Springfield Dam (Black River), Ball Mountain Dam (West 
River), and Townshend Dam (West River), Vermont, to regulate flow and 
temperature to mitigate downstream impacts on aquatic habitat and 
fisheries.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000.

SEC. 5027. COST SHARING PROVISIONS FOR THE TERRITORIES.

    Section 1156 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2310) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Use of Federal Funds by Non-Federal Interests.--A non-Federal 
interest may use Federal funds to provide the non-Federal share of the 
costs of a study or project carried out at a location referred to in 
subsection (a), if the agency or department that provides the Federal 
funds determines that the funds are eligible to be used for that 
purpose.''.

SEC. 5028. INNER HARBOR NAVIGATION CANAL LOCK PROJECT.

    Not later than July 1, 2008, the Secretary shall--
            (1) issue a final environmental impact statement relating 
        to the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock project; and
            (2) develop and maintain a transportation mitigation 
        program relating to that project in coordination with--
                    (A) St. Bernard Parish;
                    (B) Orleans Parish;
                    (C) the Old Arabi Neighborhood Association; and
                    (D) other interested parties.

SEC. 5029. GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION.

    (a) Definition of Great Lakes and Connecting Channels.--In this 
section, the term ``Great Lakes and connecting channels'' includes--
            (1) Lakes Superior, Huron, Michigan, Erie, and Ontario;
            (2) any connecting water between or among those lakes that 
        is used for navigation;
            (3) any navigation feature in those lakes or water the 
        operation or maintenance of which is a Federal responsibility; 
        and
            (4) any area of the Saint Lawrence River that is operated 
        or maintained by the Federal Government for navigation.
    (b) Navigation.--Using available funds, the Secretary shall 
expedite the operation and maintenance, including dredging to 
authorized project depths, of the navigation features of the Great 
Lakes and connecting channels for the purpose of supporting navigation.

                   TITLE VI--PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS

SEC. 6001. LITTLE COVE CREEK, GLENCOE, ALABAMA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, 
Alabama, authorized by the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (99 
Stat. 312), is not authorized.

SEC. 6002. GOLETA AND VICINITY, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Goleta and Vicinity, California, 
authorized by section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 
1826), is not authorized.

SEC. 6003. BRIDGEPORT HARBOR, CONNECTICUT.

    (a) In General.--The portion of the project for navigation, 
Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the Act of July 3, 1930 
(46 Stat. 919), consisting of an 18-foot channel in Yellow Mill River 
and described in subsection (b), is not authorized.
    (b) Description of Project.--The project referred to in subsection 
(a) is described as beginning at a point along the eastern limit of the 
existing project, N. 123,649.75, E. 481,920.54, thence running 
northwesterly about 52.64 feet to a point N. 123,683.03, E. 481,879.75, 
thence running northeasterly about 1,442.21 feet to a point N. 
125,030.08, E. 482,394.96, thence running northeasterly about 139.52 
feet to a point along the east limit of the existing channel, N. 
125,133.87, E. 482,488.19, thence running southwesterly about 1,588.98 
feet to the point of origin.

SEC. 6004. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, PART 
              II, INSTALLATION OF FENDER PROTECTION FOR BRIDGES, 
              DELAWARE AND MARYLAND.

    The project for the construction of bridge fenders for the Summit 
and St. Georges Bridge for the Inland Waterway of the Delaware River to 
the C & D Canal of the Chesapeake Bay, authorized by the River and 
Harbor Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1249), is not authorized.

SEC. 6005. SHINGLE CREEK BASIN, FLORIDA.

    The project for flood control, Central and Southern Florida 
Project, Shingle Creek Basin, Florida, authorized by section 203 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1182), is not authorized.

SEC. 6006. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, SOUTH FORK OF THE SOUTH BRANCH OF THE 
              CHICAGO RIVER, ILLINOIS.

    (a) In General.--The portion of the Illinois Waterway project 
authorized by the Act of January 21, 1927 (commonly known as the 
``River and Harbor Act of 1927'') (44 Stat. 1013), in the South Fork of 
the South Branch of the Chicago River, as identified in subsection (b) 
is not authorized.
    (b) Description of Project Portion.--The portion of the project 
referred to in subsection (a) is the portion of the SW \1/4\ of sec. 
29, T. 39 N., R. 14 E., Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, 
Illinois, and more particularly described as follows:
            (1) Commencing at the SW corner of the SW \1/4\.
            (2) Thence north 1 degree, 32 minutes, 31 seconds west, 
        bearing based on the Illinois State Plane Coordinate System, 
        NAD 83 east zone, along the west line of that quarter, 1810.16 
        feet to the southerly line of the Illinois and Michigan Canal.
            (3) Thence north 50 degrees, 41 minutes, 55 seconds east 
        along that southerly line 62.91 feet to the easterly line of 
        South Ashland Avenue, as widened by the ordinance dated 
        November 24, 1920, which is also the east line of an easement 
        to the State of Illinois for highway purposes numbered 12340342 
        and recorded July 13, 1939, for a point of beginnings.
            (4) Thence continuing north 50 degrees, 41 minutes, 55 
        seconds east along that southerly line 70.13 feet to the 
        southerly line of the South Branch Turning Basin per for the 
        plat numbered 3645392 and recorded January 19, 1905.
            (5) Thence south 67 degrees, 18 minutes, 31 seconds east 
        along that southerly line 245.50 feet.
            (6) Thence north 14 degrees, 35 minutes, 13 seconds east 
        145.38 feet.
            (7) Thence north 10 degrees, 57 minutes, 15 seconds east 
        326.87 feet.
            (8) Thence north 17 degrees, 52 minutes, 44 seconds west 
        56.20 feet.
            (9) Thence north 52 degrees, 7 minutes, 32 seconds west 
        78.69 feet.
            (10) Thence north 69 degrees, 26 minutes, 35 seconds west 
        58.97 feet.
            (11) Thence north 90 degrees, 00 minutes, 00 seconds west 
        259.02 feet to the east line of South Ashland Avenue.
            (12) Thence south 1 degree, 32 minutes, 31 seconds east 
        along that east line 322.46 feet.
            (13) Thence south 00 degrees, 14 minutes, 35 seconds east 
        along that east line 11.56 feet to the point of beginnings.

SEC. 6007. BREVOORT, INDIANA.

    The project for flood control, Brevoort, Indiana, authorized by 
section 5 of the Flood Control Act of 1936 (49 Stat. 1587), is not 
authorized.

SEC. 6008. MIDDLE WABASH, GREENFIELD BAYOU, INDIANA.

    The project for flood control, Middle Wabash, Greenfield Bayou, 
Indiana, authorized by section 10 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (60 
Stat. 649), is not authorized.

SEC. 6009. LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, INDIANA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Lake George, Hobart, 
Indiana, authorized by section 602 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148), is not authorized.

SEC. 6010. GREEN BAY LEVEE AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 2, IOWA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Green Bay Levee and 
Drainage District No. 2, Iowa, authorized by section 401(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4115), deauthorized 
in fiscal year 1991, and reauthorized by section 115(a)(1) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4821), is not authorized.

SEC. 6011. MUSCATINE HARBOR, IOWA.

    The project for navigation at the Muscatine Harbor on the 
Mississippi River at Muscatine, Iowa, authorized by section 101 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 166), is not authorized.

SEC. 6012. BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATIONAL AREA, 
              KENTUCKY AND TENNESSEE.

    The project for recreation facilities at Big South Fork National 
River and Recreational Area, Kentucky and Tennessee, authorized by 
section 108 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 
43), is not authorized.

SEC. 6013. EAGLE CREEK LAKE, KENTUCKY.

    The project for flood control and water supply, Eagle Creek Lake, 
Kentucky, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 
(76 Stat. 1188), is not authorized.

SEC. 6014. HAZARD, KENTUCKY.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Hazard, Kentucky, 
authorized by section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 
(102 Stat. 4014) and section 108 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4621), is not authorized.

SEC. 6015. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KENTUCKY.

    The project for flood control, West Kentucky Tributaries, Kentucky, 
authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
1081), section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1825), 
and section 401(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4129), is not authorized.

SEC. 6016. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LOUISIANA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Bayou Cocodrie and 
Tributaries, Louisiana, authorized by section 3 of the of the Act of 
August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 644, chapter 377), and section 1(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 12), is not 
authorized.

SEC. 6017. BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE JUMP, LOUISIANA.

    The uncompleted portions of the project for navigation improvement 
for Bayou LaFourche and LaFourche Jump, Louisiana, authorized by the 
Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1033, chapter 831), and the River and 
Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 481), are not authorized.

SEC. 6018. EASTERN RAPIDES AND SOUTH-CENTRAL AVOYELLES PARISHES, 
              LOUISIANA.

    The project for flood control, Eastern Rapides and South-Central 
Avoyelles Parishes, Louisiana, authorized by section 201 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1825), is not authorized.

SEC. 6019. FORT LIVINGSTON, GRAND TERRE ISLAND, LOUISIANA.

    The project for erosion protection and recreation, Fort Livingston, 
Grande Terre Island, Louisiana, authorized by the Act of August 13, 
1946 (commonly known as the ``Flood Control Act of 1946'') (33 U.S.C. 
426e et seq.), is not authorized.

SEC. 6020. GULF INTERCOASTAL WATERWAY, LAKE BORGNE AND CHEF MENTEUR, 
              LOUISIANA.

    The project for the construction of bulkheads and jetties at Lake 
Borgne and Chef Menteur, Louisiana, as part of the Gulf Intercoastal 
Waterway authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor Act of 
1946 (60 Stat. 635), is not authorized.

SEC. 6021. RED RIVER WATERWAY, SHREVEPORT, LOUISIANA TO DAINGERFIELD, 
              TEXAS.

    The project for the Red River Waterway, Shreveport, Louisiana to 
Daingerfield, Texas, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731), is not authorized.

SEC. 6022. CASCO BAY, PORTLAND, MAINE.

    The project for environmental infrastructure, Casco Bay in the 
Vicinity of Portland, Maine, authorized by section 307 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4841), is not authorized.

SEC. 6023. NORTHEAST HARBOR, MAINE.

    The project for navigation, Northeast Harbor, Maine, authorized by 
section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 12, chapter 19), is not 
authorized.

SEC. 6024. PENOBSCOT RIVER, BANGOR, MAINE.

    The project for environmental infrastructure, Penobscot River in 
the Vicinity of Bangor, Maine, authorized by section 307 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4841), is not authorized.

SEC. 6025. SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, MAINE.

    The project for research and demonstration program of cropland 
irrigation and soil conservation techniques, Saint John River Basin, 
Maine, authorized by section 1108 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (106 Stat. 4230), is not authorized.

SEC. 6026. TENANTS HARBOR, MAINE.

    The project for navigation, Tenants Harbor, Maine, authorized by 
the first section of the Act of March 2, 1919 (40 Stat. 1275, chapter 
95), is not authorized.

SEC. 6027. FALMOUTH HARBOR, MASSACHUSETTS.

    The portion of the project for navigation, Falmouth Harbor, 
Massachusetts, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1948 (62 Stat. 1172), beginning at a point along the eastern side of 
the inner harbor N200,415.05, E845,307.98, thence running north 25 
degrees 48 minutes 54.3 seconds east 160.24 feet to a point 
N200,559.20, E845,377.76, thence running north 22 degrees 7 minutes 
52.4 seconds east 596.82 feet to a point N201,112.15, E845,602.60, 
thence running north 60 degrees 1 minute 0.3 seconds east 83.18 feet to 
a point N201,153.72, E845,674.65, thence running south 24 degrees 56 
minutes 43.4 seconds west 665.01 feet to a point N200,550.75, 
E845,394.18, thence running south 32 degrees 25 minutes 29.0 seconds 
west 160.76 feet to the point of origin, is not authorized.

SEC. 6028. ISLAND END RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS.

    The portion of the project for navigation, Island End River, 
Massachusetts, carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), described as follows: Beginning at a point 
along the eastern limit of the existing project, N507,348.98, 
E721,180.01, thence running northeast about 35 feet to a point 
N507,384.17, E721,183.36, thence running northeast about 324 feet to a 
point N507,590.51, E721,433.17, thence running northeast about 345 feet 
to a point along the northern limit of the existing project, 
N507,927.29, E721,510.29, thence running southeast about 25 feet to a 
point N507,921.71, E721,534.66, thence running southwest about 354 feet 
to a point N507,576.65, E721,455.64, thence running southwest about 357 
feet to the point of origin, is not authorized.

SEC. 6029. MYSTIC RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS.

    The portion of the project for navigation, Mystic River, 
Massachusetts, authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor 
Appropriations Act of July 13, 1892 (27 Stat. 96), between a line 
starting at a point N515,683.77, E707,035.45 and ending at a point 
N515,721.28, E707,069.85 and a line starting at a point N514,595.15, 
E707,746.15 and ending at a point N514,732.94, E707,658.38 shall be 
relocated and reduced from a 100-foot wide channel to a 50-foot wide 
channel after the date of enactment of this Act described as follows: 
Beginning at a point N515,721.28, E707,069.85, thence running 
southeasterly about 840.50 feet to a point N515,070.16, E707,601.27, 
thence running southeasterly about 177.54 feet to a point N514,904.84, 
E707,665.98, thence running southeasterly about 319.90 feet to a point 
with coordinates N514,595.15, E707,746.15, thence running northwesterly 
about 163.37 feet to a point N514,732.94, E707,658.38, thence running 
northwesterly about 161.58 feet to a point N514.889.47, E707,618.30, 
thence running northwesterly about 166.61 feet to a point N515.044.62, 
E707,557.58, thence running northwesterly about 825.31 feet to a point 
N515,683.77, E707,035.45, thence running northeasterly about 50.90 feet 
returning to a point N515,721.28, E707,069.85.

SEC. 6030. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MICHIGAN.

    The project for navigation, Grand Haven Harbor, Michigan, 
authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4093), is not authorized.

SEC. 6031. GREENVILLE HARBOR, MISSISSIPPI.

    The project for navigation, Greenville Harbor, Mississippi, 
authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4142), is not authorized.

SEC. 6032. PLATTE RIVER FLOOD AND RELATED STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL, 
              NEBRASKA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Platte River Flood and 
Related Streambank Erosion Control, Nebraska, authorized by section 603 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4149), is not 
authorized.

SEC. 6033. EPPING, NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    The project for environmental infrastructure, Epping, New 
Hampshire, authorized by section 219(c)(6) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835), is not authorized.

SEC. 6034. NEW YORK HARBOR AND ADJACENT CHANNELS, CLAREMONT TERMINAL, 
              JERSEY CITY, NEW JERSEY.

    The project for navigation, New York Harbor and adjacent channels, 
Claremont Terminal, Jersey City, New Jersey, authorized by section 
202(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098), 
is not authorized.

SEC. 6035. EISENHOWER AND SNELL LOCKS, NEW YORK.

    The project for navigation, Eisenhower and Snell Locks, New York, 
authorized by section 1163 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4258), is not authorized.

SEC. 6036. OLCOTT HARBOR, LAKE ONTARIO, NEW YORK.

    The project for navigation, Olcott Harbor, Lake Ontario, New York, 
authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4143), is not authorized.

SEC. 6037. OUTER HARBOR, BUFFALO, NEW YORK.

    The project for navigation, Outer Harbor, Buffalo, New York, 
authorized by section 110 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4817), is not authorized.

SEC. 6038. SUGAR CREEK BASIN, NORTH CAROLINA AND SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Sugar Creek Basin, North 
Carolina and South Carolina, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4121), is not authorized.

SEC. 6039. CLEVELAND HARBOR 1958 ACT, OHIO.

    The project for navigation, Cleveland Harbor (uncompleted portion), 
Ohio, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 
Stat. 299), is not authorized.

SEC. 6040. CLEVELAND HARBOR 1960 ACT, OHIO.

    The project for navigation, Cleveland Harbor (uncompleted portion), 
Ohio, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 
Stat. 482), is not authorized.

SEC. 6041. CLEVELAND HARBOR, UNCOMPLETED PORTION OF CUT #4, OHIO.

    The project for navigation, Cleveland Harbor (uncompleted portion 
of Cut #4), Ohio, authorized by the first section of the Act of July 
24, 1946 (60 Stat. 636, chapter 595), is not authorized.

SEC. 6042. COLUMBIA RIVER, SEAFARERS MEMORIAL, HAMMOND, OREGON.

    The project for the Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, 
Oregon, authorized by title I of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 1991 (104 Stat. 2078), is not authorized.

SEC. 6043. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for flood control and recreation, Tioga-Hammond Lakes, 
Mill Creek Recreation, Pennsylvania, authorized by section 203 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 313), is not authorized.

SEC. 6044. TAMAQUA, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for flood control, Tamaqua, Pennsylvania, authorized by 
section 1(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 
14), is not authorized.

SEC. 6045. NARRAGANSETT TOWN BEACH, NARRAGANSETT, RHODE ISLAND.

    The project for navigation, Narragansett Town Beach, Narragansett, 
Rhode Island, authorized by section 361 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4861), is not authorized.

SEC. 6046. QUONSET POINT-DAVISVILLE, RHODE ISLAND.

    The project for bulkhead repairs, Quonset Point-Davisville, Rhode 
Island, authorized by section 571 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3788), is not authorized.

SEC. 6047. ARROYO COLORADO, TEXAS.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Arroyo Colorado, Texas, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4125), is not authorized.

SEC. 6048. CYPRESS CREEK-STRUCTURAL, TEXAS.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Cypress Creek-Structural, 
Texas, authorized by section 3(a)(13) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014), is not authorized.

SEC. 6049. EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, INCREMENT 2, EAST FORK OF THE 
              TRINITY RIVER, TEXAS.

    The project for flood damage reduction, East Fork Channel 
Improvement, Increment 2, East Fork of the Trinity River, Texas, 
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 
1185), is not authorized.

SEC. 6050. FALFURRIAS, TEXAS.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Falfurrias, Texas, 
authorized by section 3(a)(14) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014), is not authorized.

SEC. 6051. PECAN BAYOU LAKE, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, Pecan Bayou Lake, Texas, authorized 
by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 742), is not 
authorized.

SEC. 6052. LAKE OF THE PINES, TEXAS.

    The project for navigation improvements affecting Lake of the 
Pines, Texas, for the portion of the Red River below Fulton, Arkansas, 
authorized by the Act of July 13, 1892 (27 Stat. 88, chapter 158), as 
amended by the Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 635, chapter 595), the 
Act of May 17, 1950 (64 Stat. 163, chapter 188), and the River and 
Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731), is not authorized.

SEC. 6053. TENNESSEE COLONY LAKE, TEXAS.

    The project for navigation, Tennessee Colony Lake, Trinity River, 
Texas, authorized by section 204 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 
(79 Stat. 1091), is not authorized.

SEC. 6054. CITY WATERWAY, TACOMA, WASHINGTON.

    The portion of the project for navigation, City Waterway, Tacoma, 
Washington, authorized by the first section of the Act of June 13, 1902 
(32 Stat. 347), consisting of the last 1,000 linear feet of the inner 
portion of the Waterway beginning at Station 70+00 and ending at 
Station 80+00, is not authorized.

SEC. 6055. KANAWHA RIVER, CHARLESTON, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The project for bank erosion, Kanawha River, Charleston, West 
Virginia, authorized by section 603(f)(13) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4153), is not authorized.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1495

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```