alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 28, 2014

No. 04-14-00014-CV

Sherman Patrick MILLER,

Appellant

v.

Lee Ann Marie MILLER,

Appellee

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-12-51753-CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

A filing fee of $195.00 was due when this appeal was filed but it was not paid. See

TEXAS SUPREME COURT ORDER REGARDING FEES CHARGED IN THE SUPREME COURT, IN CIVIL 

CASES IN THE COURTS OF APPEALS, AND BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT 

LITIGATION (Misc. Docket No. 13-9127, Aug. 16, 2013). The clerk of the court notified 

appellants of this deficiency in a letter dated January 6, 2014. The fee remains unpaid. Rule 5 of 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:

A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay –

at the time an item is presented for filing – whatever fees are required by statute 

or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order 

that is just.

TEX. R. APP. P. 5. 

We therefore order appellant, not later than February 7, 2014 to either (1) pay the 

applicable filing fee, or (2) provide written proof to this court that he is indigent or otherwise 

excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying the fee. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 20.1 (providing that indigent party who complies with provisions of that rule may 

proceed without advance payment of costs). If appellant fails to respond satisfactorily within the 

time ordered, this appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.
The clerk is ordered to serve copies of this order on all counsel, the district clerk, and the 

court reporter. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of January, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7189]

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of State, including under the heading “International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement” of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. L. 111-117), I hereby determine that the Government of Bolivia is investigating, prosecuting, and punishing military and police personnel who have been credibly alleged to have violated internationally recognized human rights.

                    This Determination shall be transmitted to the Congress and published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: September 17, 2010.

Hillary Rodham Clinton,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-24418 Filed 9-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5366]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

         REPORTS OF COMMITTEES ON PUBLIC BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS

  Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to 
the Clerk for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as 
follows:

       Mr. LEACH: Committee on Banking and Financial Services. 
     H.R. 1062. A bill to enhance competition in the financial 
     services industry by providing a prudential framework for the 
     affiliation of banks, securities firms, and other financial 
     service providers; with an amendment (Rept. 104-127, Pt. 1). 
     Ordered to be printed.

                          ____________________
```
EX-10.2






EXHIBIT 10.2




SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA




WAIVER



In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation in the
United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily
waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or
benefits that are required to comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury
as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008.



I acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive
and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called “golden
parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they relate to the
period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the
TARP Capital Purchase Program.



This waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related
to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation a claim
for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by
which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these
regulations on my employment relationship.




Agreed to and acknowledged

as of the 19th day of December, 2008:




	 	 	 
	/s/ Dennis S. Hudson, III
 

Dennis S. Hudson, III

	 	 
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 	 
	/s/ William R. Hahl
 

William R. Hahl

	 	 
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	 
	 	 
	/s/ O. Jean Strickland
 

O. Jean Strickland

	 	 
	Senior Executive Vice President
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	/s/ A. Douglas Gilbert
 

A. Douglas Gilbert

	 	 
	President and Chief Operating Officer
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	/s/ H. Russell Holland III
 

H. Russell Holland III

	 	 
	Executive Vice President, Chief Banking Officer
#### Foos Manufacturing Co. v. W. R. Prather.

(No. 6767.)

Error from Dallas County.

McCormick & Spence, counsel for appellant.

J. W. Moore, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§131. *Appeal from justice's to county court; dismissal of for failure to file transcript.*Plaintiffs in error appealed from a judgment rendered against them in favor of appellee in justice’s court to the county court. They perfected their appeal November 26, 1888, the same day on which a term of the county court began. The next term of the county court began on February 4,1889, and the transcript from justice’s court was filed February I, 1889, that being the third day of said February term. On March 1, 1889, the defendant in error moved to dismiss said appeal upon the ground that the transcript, etc., had not been filed in-the time required by law, and *192the court sustained said motion. We are of the opinion that the court erred in dismissing the appeal. Said appeal was not perfected until the appeal bond was filed, and said bond was not filed until the November term of the county court had commenced, and the appeal was therefore not returnable to that but to the succeeding term of the county court, which began February 4, 1889. At said return term the transcript, etc., were filed, but not on the first day of said term, as required by law. [Sayles’ Civil St., art. 1641.] The failure of the justice of the peace to file the transcript, etc., on the first day of said term did not entitle defendant in error to have the appeal dismissed. Amotion to dismiss an appeal from justice’s court upon the ground of failure to file transcript, etc., in time is not maintainable, unless the transcript, etc., have not been filed on the first day of the next term of the county court after the return term of the appeal. [3 Civil Cas. Ct. App., § 284. ] Because the court erred in dismissing the appeal the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a trial *de novo*in the county court.

June 7, 1890.

Reversed and remanded.
News United States Air Force
 Defense secretary visits NellisPublished Sept. 9, 2015
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jack Sanders
                        
                        
                        99th Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, Nev. (AFNS) --**
                Defense Secretary Ash Carter visited the Nellis Air Force Base Aug. 26 to observe Red Flag 15-4 operations and speak to Airmen and coalition partners about the future of the force and innovation.While at the base, the secretary visited the 414th Combat Training Squadron, toured the Combined Air Operations Center, visited the 757th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron Strike Aircraft Maintenance Unit to see F-15E Strike Eagle maintenance Airmen at work and held an all call."It was a huge honor for us at Strike AMU that he would take the time out of his day to invest such a personal interest in us," said Capt. Christopher Bright, the 757th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron Strike AMU officer in charge. "He seemed like someone who generally cares."During the secretary's visit he actively sought out Airmen and had them explain to him their role in the squadron."Every time I come here I'm so impressed," Carter said. "I'm impressed by how realistic the training that is done here is."Red Flag is one of the most advanced training programs in the world and is a realistic combat training exercise involving the air forces of the U.S. and its allies. Red Flag is coordinated at Nellis AFB and conducted on the vast bombing and gunnery ranges of the Nevada Test and Training Range.The secretary said as a country, America's military is in a period of transitioning to a full-spectrum defense against less traditional enemies."We need to look ahead to a full spectrum of threats," Carter said.Before departing, he emphasized that training -- like what happens on Nellis AFB -- is what moves the U.S. forward and away from a narrower mindset."You here at Nellis AFB are at the center of America's military transition to full spectrum," Carter said. "The new technology like the F-35(A Lightning II) and all the other stuff like, space, cyber, electronic warfare and all the other technology represented here is an ingredient of that transition, but the most important ingredient to it is you."All of this doesn't matter without you, without skilled people who know how to operate, who know how to maintain, and who know how to imagine future operations. Without you the technology doesn't get us anywhere. At the end of the day the most important ingredient in the finest fighting force the world has ever known is you."ACC 



defense secretary 



Ash Carter 



red flag 



nellis afb
## NUMBER 13 - 21 - 00254 - CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

N INFA SOLIZ , A PPELLANT ,
v. T HE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

. On appeal from the 156th District Court of Live Oak County , Texas. 

## O R D E R
Before Chief J ustice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Sil va Order Per Curia m
Appellant, Ninfa Soliz , has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from h er conviction in trial court cause number LCR210049

. The trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have t he right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a defendant has a right of appeal is not made a part of the record. Id. R. 25.2(d); see i d. R. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. The purpose of the certification requirement is to efficiently sort appealable cases from non

-2 appealable cases so that appealable cases can “move through the system unhindered while eliminating, at an early stage, the time and expe nse associated with non

appealable cases.” Greenwell v. Ct. of Apps. for the Thirteenth Jud. Dist. , 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see Hargesheimer v. State , 182 S.W.3d 906, 912 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Within thirty days of this notic e, appellant’s counsel , Da rice Shaw , is hereby ORDERED to: 1) review the record; 2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal and/or advi se this Court as to the existence of any amended certification. If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant has a right to appeal, counsel is further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within thirty days of this notice, identifying and explaini ng substantive reasons why appellant has a right to appeal. See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 44.3, 44.4; Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 614

– 15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also, e.g., Carroll v. State , 119 S.W.3d 838, 841 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.) (certifi cation form provided in appendix to appellate rules may be modified to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under circumstances not addressed by the form). The motion must include an analysis of the applicable case law, and any factual allegations t herein must be true and supported by the record. See Dears , 154 S.W.3d at 614

– 15; c f. Woods v. State, 108 S.W.3d 314, 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (construing former appellate rule 25.2(b)(3) and holding that recitations in the notice of appeal must be true and supported by the record). Copies of record documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the certification affecting3 appellant’s right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1, 10.2. PER CURIAM Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed on this 16 th day of August, 2021.
#### Willie J. ZENO, Sr. v. FLOWERS’ BAKING COMPANY.

No. 2011-C-1234.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Zeno, Sr., Willie; — Plaintiff; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s action dated September 23, 2011; Workers’ Compensation District 04, No. 2010-02790; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-1413.

Not considered. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule IX, Section 6.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 20, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 20, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0208. THE CITY OF SAVANNAH v. BARBARA BATTISTA.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: STCV1700996
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                   553
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         42,379
<ALLOWANCES>                                             774
<INVENTORY>                                          172,097
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     222,294
<PP&E>                                               175,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                        49,138
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       353,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 60,795
<BONDS>                                               90,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                              17,466
<OTHER-SE>                                           148,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         353,682
<SALES>                                              274,748
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     274,748
<CGS>                                                147,190
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        262,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     4,859
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        6,989
<INCOME-TAX>                                           2,744
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    4,245
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                           4,245
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0.24


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5487]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1015
                    CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM MEASURES

  (Mr. CLINGER asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. CLINGER. Mr. Speaker, the American people are sick and tired of 
lopsided elections that allow politicians to return to office year 
after year regardless of their performance. The overwhelming reelection 
advantages of incumbents have left many American voters feeling that 
entrenched politicians are rarely held accountable to those they 
represent.
  Many frustrated Americans have identified term limits as a way of 
bringing Government closer to the people, but the term limits movement 
has been put on hold after its defeat in the House and the Supreme 
Court decision handed down this week.
  If the 104th Congress wants to address the heart of the public's 
concerns, we must adopt real campaign finance reform that improves the 
competitiveness of congressional races.
  Today, I am reintroducing a series of bills designed to level the 
playing field between incumbent and challenger. My four bills would 
reduce the influence of special interest PAC's, ban leadership PAC's, 
reinstate the tax credit for in-State contributors, and require that 
residents of a candidate's district account for a clear majority of the 
candidate's contributions.
  If my colleagues want to restore public confidence in the election 
process, improve membership turnover, and ensure elected 
representatives are held more accountable to their constituents. I 
invite them to join me in cosponsoring these campaign finance reform 
measures.

                          ____________________
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Donald MONROE.

No. 2011-K-0061.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2011.

In re Monroe, Donald; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 479-470; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-KA-0194.

Denied.
#### In re Gary E. JENKINS.

No. 2011-OB-0754.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 3, 2011.

ORDER

KNOLL, J.

Considering the Petition for Resignation from the Practice of Law filed by petitioner, Gary E. Jenkins,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition of Gary E. Jenkins, Louisiana Bar Roll number 17407, seeking to voluntarily resign from the practice of law in the State of Louisiana pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XVIII, § 5 be and is hereby granted.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Western Ohio Financial
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Craig F. Fortin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                            By: /s/ Craig F. Fortin
                            Name: Craig F. Fortin
                            Chief Financial Officer
                            November 13, 2002
#### E. M. Filman v. J. B. Johnson.

(No.6924.)

Error from Edwards County.

Victor H. Hetter, counsel for plaintiff in error.

No counsel appeared for defendant in error.

June 25, 1890.

Opinion by

Will-son, J.

§152. *Citation; service of on one defendant no authority for judgment against others, when.*Plaintiff in error sued defendant in error and H. J. Frees and Charles Ettinger to recover an alleged indebtedness of $250. Service of citation was had only upon H. J. Frees. Judgment by default was rendered against all the defendants. From said judgment Tilman alone prosecutes this writ of error. No facts are alleged in the petition which would make service of citation upon one of the defendants valid as to all of them. Service of citation upon Frees did not therefore authorize judgment by default against the other parties.

Reversed and remanded.