alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Austin L. Roberts, III, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bay Banks of Virginia Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s), and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act, Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 16, 2005



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Austin L. Roberts, III                                  
|Austin L. Roberts, III President and Chief Executive Officer



57
EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATIONS



I, Michael Schumacher, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of National
Superstars, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

(Date)                              December 15, 2003


BY(Signature)                       /s/ Michael Schumacher
(Name and Title)                    Michael Schumacher
                                    Treasurer, Secretary and Chief
                                    Financial Officer
News United States Air Force
 McChord performs during Rainier War exercisePublished Dec. 16, 2015
                        
                        By Senior Airman Divine Cox
                        
                        
                        62nd Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE LEWIS-MCCHORD, Wash. (AFNS) --**
                In today's military, aircrews have to be trained and ready to handle any type of combat scenario, and recently, members of Joint Base Lewis-McChord and other bases participated in exercise Rainier War to help hone their skills.Aircrews from Joint Base Lewis-McChord; Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii; Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska; and Joint Base Charleston, South Carolina, departed from McChord Field Dec. 10 to participate in a joint forcible entry exercise over Moses Lake, Washington.Rainier War is a semiannual large formation exercise, hosted by the 62nd Airlift Wing, designed to train aircrews under realistic scenarios that support a full spectrum operations against modern threats and replicate today's contingency operations."We launched 11 C-17 Globemaster III's to train and hone our combat and humanitarian mobility delivery skills," said Col. Leonard Kosinski, the 62nd AW commander.Once the aircraft launched and were in the air, aircrews began preparing their aircraft for its large formation airdrops.Before the formation performed the heavy container delivery system airdrops, the aircrews performed low-level flying prior to arriving at the drop zone in Moses Lake."I enjoy watching the success of our hard work," said Staff Sgt. Joseph Timpson, a 10th Airlift Squadron loadmaster. "Practice makes perfect, and when you train all the time, specifically on airdrop missions, you expect everything to be perfect."Rainier War included the large formation airdrops and a larger formation of C 17s before heading back to McChord."This was a very challenging exercise and lots of important learning took place," Kosinski said. "It was incredibly realistic and challenging training needed to ensure we are ready whenever and wherever our nation calls."Joint Base Lewis-McChord 



Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson 



Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam 



C-17 



AMC 



training
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00133

- CV

J ACOB A NTHONY W EBB

, Appellant

V

.

C ITY OF F ORT W ORTH , Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 348th District Court

of Tarrant County ( 348

- 316897

- 20 )

January 13, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judg me nt of the trial

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant, Jacob An thony Webb shall pay all costs of

this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ M ike Wallach

___________________ Justice Mike Walla ch
Exhibit 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank Dalene, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: September 12, 2005       /s/ Frank Dalene

Frank Dalene

Chief Financial Officer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1396 

To amend the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990 to prohibit the labeling 

of cloned livestock and products derived from cloned livestock as organic. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2007 

Ms. WOOLSEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990 to 

prohibit the labeling of cloned livestock and products 

derived from cloned livestock as organic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF CLONED LIVESTOCK. 

4 Section 2103 of the Organic Foods Production Act 

5 of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 6502) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (6) through 

7 (21) as paragraphs (7) through (22) respectively; 

8 and 

9 (2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the fol10 lowing: 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1396 IH

1 ‘‘(6) CLONED LIVESTOCK.—The term ‘cloned 

2 livestock’ means— 

3 ‘‘(A) livestock produced as the result of so4 matic cell nuclear transfer or other asexual re5 production technologies; and 

6 ‘‘(B) the progeny of such livestock.’’. 

7 SEC. 2. NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR ORGANIC PRODUC8 TION. 

9 Section 2105 of the Organic Foods Production Act 

10 of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 6504) is amended— 

11 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

12 end; 

13 (2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para14 graph (4); and 

15 (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol16 lowing: 

17 ‘‘(3) not be cloned livestock, or produced or de18 rived from or containing any part of cloned livestock; 

19 and’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTH
PERIOD ENDED SEPT. 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               3
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,171
<PP&E>                                          24,405
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,693
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,121
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           160
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,771
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,319
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               252,328
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  168,267
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,509)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,420
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,929)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,929)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.33)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Petro Stopping Centers, L.P. (the Company), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This
written statement is being furnished to the SEC as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | /s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.               
|                        |  | (J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)                 
|                        |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
|                        | 
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | /s/ Edward Escudero                  
|                        |  | (Edward Escudero)                    
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kadeem BURDEN.

No. 2011-KK-2152.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Burden, Kadeem; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 06-11-0497; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 1595.

Denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.02 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 of
Hartford Life, Inc. (the Company), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 as
enacted by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Lizabeth H. ZlatkuName: Lizabeth H. ZlatkusTitle: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: February 28, 2005
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case therefore is submitted

without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 3/19/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

 

CARL EUGENE HOWARD, )

)

Plaintiff-Appellant, )

) 

vs. ) No. 96-3000

) (D.C. No. 95-CV-3514)

MICHAEL A. NELSON, Warden, ) (D. Kan.)

D. DONLEY, Unit Team/Hearing Officer, )

K. DUTTON, CSI - Correctional Officer, )

and THE STATE OF KANSAS, )

)

Defendants-Appellees. )

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

 

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.**

 

Plaintiff Carl Eugene Howard, appearing pro se, appeals the district court’s

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ.
1

 In his complaint, Plaintiff apparently requests both § 1983 and habeas corpus

relief. Plaintiff fails to state a claim regardless of how we construe his complaint.

2

 The district court denied Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on

appeal, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and thus before us as an initial matter is Plaintiff’s renewed

motion. While we agree with the district court’s assessment that the appeal is meritless,

that determination necessarily requires us to consider the merits of the complaint. See

Dotson v. United States, 287 F.2d 868 (10th Cir. 1961). Accordingly, we grant Plaintiff’s

motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dispose of the appeal on the merits.

2

P. 12(b)(6). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Plaintiff alleges that he was disciplined after an administrative hearing with a

twenty dollar fine and a reduction in good-time credits.1 According to Plaintiff, the

evidence presented at the hearing was insufficient to support the hearing board’s findings

and thus, he was denied due process.

We review the sufficiency of the complaint de novo and will uphold a Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12(b)(6) dismissal if it appears that Plaintiff can prove no set of facts that would entitle

him to relief. In making this determination, we accept all factual allegations of the

complaint as true. Roman v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 55 F 3d 542, 543 (10th Cir. 1995). 

Applying this standard and construing the pro se complaint liberally, we affirm

substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s order of dismissal.2

AFFIRMED. 

Entered for the Court,

Bobby R. Baldock

Circuit Judge
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jamie JOHNSON.

No. 2010-KP-1505.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Johnson, Jamie; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Franklin, 5th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 2004-380F; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45624-KW.

Denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Lemuel JONES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-7316.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 5, 2000.

Decided Jan. 8, 2001.

Anthony Lemuel Jones, Jr., pro se. John Staige Davis, V, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, VA, for appel-lee.

*148Before WIDENER, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Lemuel Jones, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Jones’ motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Jones,*Nos. CR-97-343; CA-99-793-3 (E.D.Va. June 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (SEC File Nos. 333-59307, 333-350660,333-67520 and 333-108868) and on Form S-3 (SEC File Nos. 333-60552 and 333-71940) of our report dated November 8, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Notify Technology Corporation for the year ended September 30,2006, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. 

 

/s/    L.L. Bradford & Company LLC 

 

Las Vegas, NV 

December 20, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 59741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24287]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCO922000-L13100000-FI0000; COC69113]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
COC69113

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas 
lease

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease COC69113 from MAB 
Resources LLC, for lands in Rio Blanco County, Colorado. The petition 
was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the 
date the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: BLM, Milada Krasilinec, Land Law 
Examiner, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (303) 239-3767.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee has agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre or fraction 
thereof per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has paid 
the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessee has 
met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in 
Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), and the BLM is proposing to reinstate lease COC69113 
effective March 1, 2010, under the original terms and conditions of the 
lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. The BLM 
has not issued a valid lease to any other interest affecting the lands.

Helen M. Hankins,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-24287 Filed 9-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P