alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1499 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt from the harbor 

maintenance tax certain commercial cargo loaded or unloaded at United 

States ports. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2007 

Mr. CUMMINGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

from the harbor maintenance tax certain commercial 

cargo loaded or unloaded at United States ports. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Short Sea Shipping 

5 Promotion Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN COMMERCIAL CARGO 

7 FROM THE HARBOR MAINTENANCE TAX. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4462 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating subsection 


bajohnson on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1499 IH

1 (i) as subjection (j) and by inserting after subsection (h) 

2 the following new subsection: 

3 ‘‘(i) EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN SHORT SEA SHIP4 PING CARGO.— 

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—No tax shall be imposed 

6 under section 4461(a) with respect to cargo con7 tained in intermodal cargo containers and loaded by 

8 crane on a vessel, or cargo loaded on a vessel by 

9 means of wheeled technology— 

10 ‘‘(A) that is loaded at a port in the United 

11 States and unloaded at another port in the 

12 United States or a port in Canada located in 

13 the Great Lakes Saint Lawrence Seaway Sys14 tem, or 

15 ‘‘(B) that is loaded at a port in Canada lo16 cated in the Great Lakes Saint Lawrence Sea17 way System and unloaded at a port in the 

18 United States. 

19 ‘‘(2) GREAT LAKES SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY

20 SYSTEM.—For the purposes of this subsection, the 

21 term ‘Great Lakes Saint Lawrence Seaway System’ 

22 means the waterway between Duluth, Minnesota and 

23 Sept. Iles, Quebec, encompassing the five Great 

24 Lakes, their connecting channels, and the Saint 

25 Lawrence River.’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1499 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall take effect on the date of enactment of 

3 this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
Order entered November 12, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00518-CR

No. 05-14-00519-CR

No. 05-14-00520-CR

MICHAEL WAYNE CAMPBELL JR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-31211-Q, F12-31218-Q, F12-31219-Q

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeals.

On October 24, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the 

reporter’s record has not been filed. On November 11, 2014, appellant filed a motion to dismiss 

his appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Accordingly, we VACATE the October 24, 2014 order 

requiring findings. We will dispose of the motion to dismiss the appeals in due course.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1416 

To restore habeas corpus for those detained by the United States and to 

repeal the prohibition on treaty obligations establishing grounds for certain claims. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2007 

Mr. NADLER (for himself, Ms. HARMAN, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. JACKSONLEE of Texas, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, and Ms. 

LEE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To restore habeas corpus for those detained by the United 

States and to repeal the prohibition on treaty obligations 

establishing grounds for certain claims. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Habeas Corpus Res5 toration Act of 2007’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1416 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF HABEAS CORPUS FOR THOSE DE2 TAINED BY THE UNITED STATES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2241 of title 28, United 

4 States Code, is amended by striking subsection (e). 

5 (b) TITLE 10.—Section 950j of title 10, United 

6 States Code, is amended by striking subsection (b) and 

7 inserting the following: 

8 ‘‘(b) LIMITED REVIEW OF MILITARY COMMISSION

9 PROCEDURES AND ACTIONS.—Except as otherwise pro10 vided in this chapter or in section 2241 of title 28 or any 

11 other habeas corpus provision, and notwithstanding any 

12 other provision of law, no court, justice, or judge shall 

13 have jurisdiction to hear or consider any claim or cause 

14 of action whatsoever, including any action pending on or 

15 filed after the date of the enactment of the Military Com16 missions Act of 2006, relating to the prosecution, trial, 

17 or judgment of a military commission under this chapter, 

18 including challenges to the lawfulness of procedures of 

19 military commissions under this chapter.’’. 

20 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION ON TREATY OBLIGATIONS 

21 ESTABLISHING GROUNDS FOR CERTAIN 

22 CLAIMS. 

23 The Military Commissions Act of 2006 (Public Law 

24 109–366) is amended by striking section 5. 

25 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICABILITY. 

26 The amendments made by this Act shall— 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1416 IH

1 (1) take effect on the date of the enactment of 

2 this Act; and 

3 (2) apply to any case that is pending on or 

4 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
OFFICE OFTHEATTORNEYGENERALOFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 

January 20, 1939 

Hon. R. 2. Bsaslsy 

County Auditor, Collin County 

MOfiMey , Texa 8 

Dear sirl 

Opinion No, O-187 

Proration of 

YOUr letter Or January 13, 

ney Gsaaral*s Department 

attention and reply; 

I am desirous or 

of handling the same. 

of the Pea00 of 

er 0r oasea 

red, and partial payments of the In these oases the 

ustioe of the Peaoe, 

wn and in one oase the deice of the Peace is of the 

ure would be to clear the 

rlgure out the proportion 

lln County, to the Constable, 

and to the Oounty Attorney and 

tor on this basis after he. 

d ror each proportional amount. 

gard to this 

nswered in opinion 

the Bon. W. P. 

Sexton, County Attorney of Orange, Texas, A oopy of this 

opinion is enclosed herewith with the section marked that 

answers your question. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEY GXKBRAL OF TBXiI..~. 

BY 

PC'. C. Xaartin 

Assistant
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      10,057,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,832,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    697,000                                 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,969,000
<PP&E>                                      78,287,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,402,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              73,125,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       98,897,000         
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (36,635,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                73,125,000
<SALES>                                     52,740,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            52,831,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               52,302,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,862,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,039,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,372,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,372,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,372,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.74)
        


</TABLE>
#### JEFFERSON DOOR COMPANY, INC. v. CRAGMAR CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C. and Angela Juneau Adams Wife of/and Ryan D. Adams.

No. 2012-C-0454.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 2012.

In re Jefferson Door Company, Inc.;— Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. M, No. 2010-12950; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-CA-1122.

Denied.
*47*CCPA

#### GREEN SHOE MANUFACTURING CO. v. NATIONAL SHOES, INC.

Patent Appeal No. 6500.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 3, 1960.

Kenway, Jenney, Witter & Hildreth, H. W. Kenway, Boston, Mass., Dos T. Hatfield, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Henry L. Burkitt, New York City, for appellee.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, and SMITH, Judges, and Judge WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK.1

1

. United States Senior Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, designated to participate *in place of Judge O’CONNELL,*pursuant to provisions of Section 294(d), Title 28 U.S.C.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from the decision of the Assistant Commissioner sustaining the dismissal of appellant’s opposition to the registration of “Stride Well” by National Shoes, Inc., as a trademark for children’s shoes. The opposition was based upon The Green Shoe Manufacturing Company’s prior registrations of “StrideRite” as a trademark for shoes.

It has come to our attention that subsequent to the Assistant Commissioner’s decision in this case, the United States District *Court*for the Southern District of New York, in The Green Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. National Shoes Inc., Civil Action 147-215, entered a consent judgment on September 10, 1959, holding that appellee’s mark “Stride Well” infringes upon appellant’s registered marks; that the court permanently enjoined appellee from using its said mark; and that subsequent to that judgment, appellee filed in the Patent Office a formal abandonment of the application involved in this appeal.

In view of those facts, it is thought that this case should be further consid*944ered by the Patent Office prior to a decision by this court, and accordingly the case is remanded to the Patent Office for consideration of the matters stated above, and for such further action, if any, as may be considered proper in view thereof.

Remanded.
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of Eclipsys Corporation



|                                             |  |             
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Subsidiary Name                              |  | Jurisdiction
|                                             | 
|Eclipsys Healthcare IT (Singapore) PTE. LTD. |  | Singapore   
|                                             | 
|Eclipsys (Mauritius) Limited                 |  | Mauritius   
|                                             | 
|Eclipsys Canada Corporation                  |  | Canada      
|                                             | 
|Eclipsys International Holdings, LLC         |  | Delaware    
|                                             | 
|Eclipsys ME, FZ-LLC                          |  | Dubai, UAE  
|                                             | 
|Eclipsys Practice Solutions, LLC             |  | Delaware    
|                                             | 
|Eclipsys (India) Private Limited             |  | India       
|                                             | 
|Premise Corporation**                        |  | Delaware    



|** | Premise Corporation was converted on February 10, 2009 into a limited liability company, named Eclipsys Patient Flow Solutions, LLC
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            3515
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3515
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   29722
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           403
<OTHER-SE>                                       29319
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     29722
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      578
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (578)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (578)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (578)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1374 

To amend the Florida National Forest Land Management Act of 2003 to 

authorize the conveyance of an additional tract of National Forest System land under that Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2007 

Mr. BOYD of Florida (for himself and Mr. CRENSHAW) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Florida National Forest Land Management 

Act of 2003 to authorize the conveyance of an additional 

tract of National Forest System land under that Act, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCES UNDER FLORIDA NATIONAL 

4 FOREST LAND MANAGEMENT ACT OF 2003. 

5 (a) ADDITIONAL CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—Sub6 section (b) of section 3 of the Florida National Forest 

7 Land Management Act of 2003 (Public Law 108–152; 

8 117 Stat. 1919) is amended— 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1374 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

2 (17); 

3 (2) by redesignating paragraph (18) as para4 graph (19); 

5 (3) by inserting after paragraph (17) the fol6 lowing new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(18) tract W–1979, located in Leon County 

8 consisting of approximately 114 acres, within T. 1 

9 S., R. 1 W., sec.25; and’’; and 

10 (4) in paragraph (19), as so redesignated, by 

11 striking ‘‘(17)’’ and inserting ‘‘(18)’’. 

12 (b) ADDITIONAL USE OF PROCEEDS.—Paragraph (2) 

13 of subsection (i) of such section (117 Stat. 1921) is 

14 amended— 

15 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara16 graph (A); 

17 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub18 paragraph (B) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

19 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub20 paragraph: 

21 ‘‘(C) acquisition, construction, or mainte22 nance of administrative improvements for units 

23 of the National Forest System in the State.’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1374 IH

1 (c) LIMITATIONS ON USE OF PROCEEDS.—Sub2 section (i) of such section is further amended by adding 

3 at the end the following new paragraphs: 

4 ‘‘(3) GEOGRAPHICAL AND USE RESTRICTION

5 FOR CERTAIN CONVEYANCE.—Notwithstanding para6 graph (2), proceeds from the sale or exchange of the 

7 tract described in subsection (b)(18) shall be used 

8 exclusively for the purchase of inholdings in the 

9 Apalachicola National Forest. 

10 ‘‘(4) RESTRICTION ON USE OF PROCEEDS FOR

11 ADMINISTRATIVE IMPROVEMENTS.—Proceeds from 

12 any sale or exchange of land under this Act may be 

13 used for administrative improvements, as authorized 

14 by paragraph (2)(C), only if the land generating the 

15 proceeds was improved with infrastructure.’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF LARRY E. NUNN & ASSOCIATES, LLC

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (registration number 333-53863), and in the related Prospectus, of
Unified Financial Services, Inc. of our report dated February 12, 1999, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for
the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997, appearing in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1998.



/s/ Larry E. Nunn & Associates, LLC
Columbus, Indiana
April 8, 1999
**Exhibit 31.1**




**CERTIFICATION**




I,
      Pehong
      Chen, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BroadVision, Inc.;




2. Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
      registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:




a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
      quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5. I
      have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
      financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
      the
      registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):




a)
      All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:
      August 07, 2007


*/s/
                PEHONG CHEN*Pehong
                Chen*Chief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer*
Date: June 15, 2001

To: Sheikh Mohammed AL Rashid
      P.O. Box 5490
     Jeddah 21422
     Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Subject:  Term sheet of M/s Sonic Jet  Performance,  Inc. for Sheikh Mohammed AL
Rashid

Loan $600,000 of Sheikh Mohammed AL Rashid will be converted as under:

1.   Note Payable (Total cash borrowed so far)                    $600,000
     This loan will be converted at one share for every $1.25.

2.   Interest on loans will be calculated @10% pa up to December 31, 2000. This
     will be converted at one share for every $1.25.

3.   Sheikh Mohammed AL Rashid will not release UCC 1 till the registration of
     converted shares is complete and the equity fund amounting to $500,000 is
     received from Investors. Upon the registration Sonic Jet Performance will
     have the right to request the cancellation of UCC 1.
4.   All the loan agreements between Sheikh Mohammed AL Rashid and Sonic Jet
     Performance, Inc. dated November 24, 1999 and after and not limited to all
     prior agreements and amendments will be canceled and replaced, which will
     be superseded by this term sheet as part of this attachment as issued by
     Capitol Investment Group, LLC. All the promissory notes issued with respect
     to the above loans and agreements will become void.

5.   The Company is obligated to issue 144D stock immediately for the above
     settlement. The Company will forward legal opinion with 144D stock attached
     to it. 144D stock issued for this settlement will be registered for
     trading. Without these 144D stock and legal opinion this agreement is null
     and void.

agreed by :

Sheikh Mohammed AL Rashid     : _______________________________________


Albert Mardikian              :________________________________________
Interim CEO
Sonic Jet Performance, Inc.

Madhava Rao Mankal            :_______________________________________
Secretary/CFO
Sonic Jet Performance, Inc.