alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21.01

                            RWD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                               RWD SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
            Subsidiary/Affiliate Company Name                 Registration
            Jurisdiction of Incorporation                      Company No.               Date Formed
            -----------------------------                     ------------               -----------
<S>                                                           <C>                  <C>
RWD Technologies UK Limited United Kingdom                        03314693          February 3, 1997
RWD Mexico, S. de R.L. Mexico                                 RME970423BF7            April 23, 1997
RWD Technologies Australia Pty Ltd Australia                    79 969 930         September 4, 1997
RWD Holdings LLC (Maryland, USA)                                  W5067707           August 21, 1998
RWD Technologien Deutschland GmbH (Germany)                       HRB 1668            August 5, 1999
Latitude360, Inc. (Maryland, USA)                                                      April 6, 2000
RWD Technologies, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Mexico)                  RTE01208C79          December 8, 2000
SAP Learning Solutions Pte. Ltd. (Singapore Joint Venture)      200010755R         December 28, 2000
</TABLE>

                                      35
<PAGE>

                                  LEONARD OSSER
                              110 EAST 71ST STREET
                               NEW YORK, NY 10022


                                 March 28, 2002

Milestone Scientific Inc.
220 South Orange Avenue
Livingston, New Jersey 07039
ATTN: THOMAS STUCKEY, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


                  RE:      MILESTONE SCIENTIFIC INC.
                           9% SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

Dear Sir:

         Please be advised that I hereby agree to defer until January 2, 2003
the payment of all principal and interest owed to me under the Milestone
Scientific Inc. 9% Secured Promissory Note issued to me in July 2000. I hereby
also agree, during the period ending January 1, 2003 to advance to Milestone up
to an additional amount of $200,000 on the same terms as specified in the 9%
Secured Promissory Note, as amended hereby.


                                                     Very truly yours,


                                                     /s/ Leonard Osser

cc:      J. H. Cohn LLP
         75 Eisenhower Parkway
         Roseland, NJ 07068-1697
         Attn: Alan J. Markowitz
#### Ramona SCOTT, Wife of/and Cedrig Scott, Sr., Individually and as Natural Tutors of the Minor, Cedric Scott, Jr. v. LEONARD J. CHABERT MEDICAL CENTER, Through Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Dr. Fadi Naddour.

No. 2011-C-0175.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2011.

In re Scott Sr., Cedric; Scott, Ramona et al.; —Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 136713; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 0192.

Denied.
**Exhibit
23.1**
 
 
 
 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 The Board
of Directors
 RC2
Corporation:
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
( Nos.
333-50957, 333-50959, 333-58035, 333-58037, 333-81705, 333-91158 and
333-91236 ) on Form
S-8 and the registration statement (No. 333-116647) on Form S-3 of RC2
Corporation of our reports dated March 4, 2005, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of RC2 Corporation as of December 31, 2003 and 2004,
and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2004, and the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual
report on Form 10-K of RC2 Corporation.
  /s/
 KPMG LLP
  Chicago,
Illinois
 March 4,
2005
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Tom Hofer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Vendalux Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Vendalux Corporation.

By:/s/
   -----------------------------
Name: Tom Hofer
Title:   Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
News United States Air Force
 Parachute water survival moves to FairchildPublished Aug. 18, 2015
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Joshua Strang
                        
                        
                        Air Education and Training Command Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Detachment 2, 66th Training Squadron, 336th Training Group at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida, relocated to Fairchild Air Force Base, Washington.Detachment 2 was responsible for conducting the three-day Parachute Water Survival Course that provides training to aircrew members who fly in aircraft with parachute egress capability and teaches crews disentanglement, drop and drag, and descent into water procedures.In the current flying training pipeline, personnel attend survival, evasion, resistance and escape training at Fairchild AFB. In the past, individuals would go TDY to NAS Pensacola for water survival training.Lt. Col. Clint Rea, the 66th TRS commander, said the 66th TRS consolidated the course with the existing non-ejection water survival course currently taught at Fairchild AFB."Foundational water survival training is a core function of the 66th Training Squadron and a key part of our heritage," Rea said. "Having this course at Fairchild will ensure this legacy of excellence continues with robust training, readiness and combat capability not only for the Air Force, but combatant commanders as well."The move is projected to save the Air Force approximately $4.6 million annually in TDY funds and operating expenses.The first course at Fairchild AFB began Aug. 10.The 66th TRS is also responsible for Detachment 1, which conducts arctic survival training at Eielson AFB, Alaska.Fairchild AFB 



AMC 



AETC 



survival 



SERE 



parachute water survival
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                                  MCLEOD, INC.


           COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                 (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                     MARCH 31,
                                                --------------------
                                                  1997       1996
                                                ---------  ---------
<S>                                             <C>        <C>
Computation of weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding and common
 equivalent shares: (A)
Common shares, Class A, outstanding at the        
 beginning of the period                           36,173     16,387 
Common shares, Class B, outstanding at the
 beginning of the period                           15,626     15,626 
Weighted average number of shares issued during     
 the period (C)                                       528       ----
Common equivalent shares attributable to stock     
options granted (B)                                  ----      5,019
Common stock issued (C)                              ----       ----
                                                 --------    -------
Weighted average number of common shares and 
 common equivalent shares                          52,327     37,055
                                                 ========    =======
Net loss                                         $(13,355)   $(4,340)
                                                 ========    =======
Loss per common and common equivalent share      $  (0.26)   $ (0.12)
                                                 ========    =======

</TABLE>

(A) All shares have been adjusted to give effect to the 3.75 for 1 stock split 
    effected in the form of a stock dividend effective March 28, 1996.

(B) All stock options are anti-dilutive; however, pursuant to Securities and
    Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83 (SAB 83), stock options
    granted with exercise prices below the assumed initial offering price during
    the twelve-month period preceding the date of the initial filing of the
    Registration Statement filed in connection with the Company's initial public
    offering have been included in the calculation of common stock equivalent
    shares as if they were outstanding for all periods through June 30, 1996,
    the quarter in which the initial public offering was completed.

(C) All stock issued during the three months ended March 31, 1996 was within the
    twelve-month period discussed in (B) above.  As a result, the shares issued
    at prices below the assumed initial public offering price during this period
    have been included in the calculation as if they were outstanding for all
    periods presented.
News United States Air Force
 Goldfein swears in as 21st CSAFPublished July 1, 2016
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Alyssa C. Gibson
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs Command Information
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Gen. David L. Goldfein was sworn in as the Air Force’s 21st chief of staff by Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James during a ceremony at the Pentagon on July 1.
As the Air Force’s most senior uniformed leader, Goldfein is responsible for ensuring the 660,000 active-duty, Guard, Reserve and civilian Airmen under his command are fully trained and equipped. He also joins the Joint Chiefs of Staff as an adviser to the secretary of defense, National Security Council and the president of the United States.
“The Air Force is going to be relying on your determination, General Goldfein, to improve readiness, to improve our modernization, and most importantly -- always at the top of the list -- taking care of our Airmen,” James said. “It is a huge responsibility, it’s also an honor, and it’s also a great privilege, and I have every confidence that you are going to take our Air Force to new heights.”
One of Goldfein’s first acts as chief of staff was to make a pledge to his Airmen.
“(This is) my commitment to you -- to work every day to give you everything I’ve got, to leave nothing on the table, to remain laser-focused on warfighting excellence, to find the opportunity in every challenge, to treat team building as a contact sport, and to be worthy of this honor,” he said. “And I can’t wait to get started. Fight’s on!”
In his previous position as the Air Force’s vice chief of staff, Goldfein presided over the Air Staff, and served as a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Requirements Oversight Council and Deputy Advisory Working Group.CSAF 



David L. Goldfein 



ceremony 



SecAF 



Deborah Lee James Related Links
        DAVID L. GOLDFEIN
                                Oct. 6, 2015
                                21st Chief of Staff of the Air Force
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60141-60142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24378]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-74,164]


International Business Machines (IBM), Global Technology Services 
Delivery Division, Including On-Site Leased Workers From Artech, 
Greenville, South Carolina; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility 
To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on August 25, 2010, applicable to workers of International Business 
Machines (IBM), Global Technology Services Delivery Division, 
Greenville, South Carolina. The Department's Notice of determination 
was published in the Federal Register on September 15, 2010 (75 FR 
56143).
    At the request of a State Workforce Agent, the Department reviewed 
the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers provide 
customer help desk support.
    During the review, the company confirmed that workers leased from 
Artech were employed on-site at the Greenville, South Carolina location 
of IBM, Global Technology Services Delivery Division. The Department 
has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control 
of the subject firm to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Artech working on-site at 
the Greenville, South Carolina location of IBM, Global Technology 
Services Delivery Division.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-74,164 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of International Business Machines (IBM), Global 
Technology Services Delivery Division, including on-site leased

[[Page 60142]]

workers from Artech, Greenville, South Carolina, who became totally 
or partially separated from employment on or after May 26, 2009, 
through August 25, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened 
with total or partial separation from employment on the date of 
certification through two years from the date of certification, are 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title 
II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of September, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-24378 Filed 9-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
News United States Air Force
 Whiteman B-2s, Airmen maintain readiness in GuamPublished Aug. 19, 2015
                        
                        By Senior Airman Joseph A. Pagán Jr.
                        
                        
                        2nd Bomb Wing Public Affairs
                **ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, Guam (AFNS) --**
                About 225 Airmen and three B-2 Spirits from Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, deployed here Aug. 7 to conduct familiarization training activities in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region.The goal of the training is to maintain force readiness by conducting flight operations in an environment outside of the U.S."The objectives I outlined are simple," said Lt. Col. Robert Makros, the 13th Bomb Squadron commander. "I want everyone to come back better and more lethal than before they left."Makros' objectives may be simple, but it's the execution of the mission that will carry this deployment toward and through the finish line."Everyone understands the role they play in the B-2 global strike mission and what it provides to leadership," Makros said. "The flexibility and ability to strike, at the time and place of leadership's choosing, any target set on the globe with precision, range, stealth and a massive payload, conventional or nuclear, is what makes this aircraft incredible."Makros also said the 13th Bomb Squadron will be training with sister services and other joint aircraft while capitalizing on multinational training events.Executing the mission provides flexibility to Air Force Global Strike Command senior leadership, making the B-2 a credible and viable option that delivers decisive effects around the globe.AFGSC routinely evaluates their readiness and reposition of forces as needed to ensure they maintain both the operational and support capabilities essential to meet training needs; this includes planned deployments to various regions around the globe, providing commanders of major commands and combatant commands a global strike capability and extended deterrence against potential adversaries."It's why we signed up and what we train for every day," Makros said. "Our aircrew and the entire B-2 team constantly push themselves to be the best because they understand being the best is a must when it comes to generating and flying 30-hour missions, and successfully striking targets halfway around the globe."The familiarization training will not only be conducted by B-2 aircrews but also by the maintainers and support personnel on the ground."Maintainers, cops, support staff -- everyone is receiving great training while deployed here," said Master Sgt. Daryl Allen, the 2nd Aircraft Maintenance Squadron first sergeant. "We all face obstacles and new training scenarios that aren't always present stateside, and we have to be ready to fix the aircraft, prepare the aircrew and get it in the sky as quickly and efficiently as possible; that comes from everyone working together."Andersen Air Force Base 



training 



B-2 Spirit 



Whiteman Air Force Base
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Robert W. Winston IIIName:
    
    Robert W. Winston, IIITitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    August 9, 2006
 52
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 10, 2009 (the
Quarterly Report) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: September 16, 2009
    /s/ Andrew F. PuzderAndrew F. PuzderChief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Docucorp International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
D. Andereck, President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Senior Vice
President Finance and Administration of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael D. Andereck
----------------------------------------
Michael D. Andereck
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Interim Senior Vice President, Finance
and Administration
October 11, 2005
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-18-00249-CR 

RANDALL CAMPBELL, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 181st District Court 

Randall County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 28,441-B, Honorable John B. Board, Presiding 

 

August 16, 2018 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before CAMPBELL and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ. 

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Randall Campbell was convicted 

of possession of a controlled substance in an amount less than one gram,

1 sentenced to 

fifteen months’ confinement, and assessed a $1,000 fine. The trial court’s certification of 

appellant’s right of appeal reflects that appellant’s case is a plea-bargain case with no 

right of appeal and that appellant waived the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

 

1 TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(b) (West 2017) (a state jail felony).
2

25.2(a)(2), (d). Notwithstanding the certification, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal

challenging his conviction2 and later filed a Motion to Quash Indictment.

We are required by appellate rule 25.2(d) to dismiss an appeal “if a certification 

that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.”

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). By letter dated July 31, 2018, we notified appellant of the 

consequences of the certification and invited him to file an amended certification showing 

a right of appeal or demonstrate other grounds for continuing the appeal on or before 

August 13. Appellant filed a response but did not file an amended certification reflecting 

a right of appeal or establish grounds for continuing the appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and appellant’s Motion to Quash Indictment

is moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Judy C. Parker

 Justice

Do not publish.

 

2 Appellant filed his notice of appeal with the Potter County district clerk on June 6, 2018. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c), 9.2(b) (mailbox rule). The notice did not identify a trial court or trial court cause 

number. The district clerk forwarded a copy of the notice to this Court for filing, along with a copy of 

appellant’s judgment of conviction in trial court cause number 74,127-D in the 320th District Court for Potter 

County. On July 23, 2018, appellant filed a letter with the Court clarifying his intent to appeal his criminal 

conviction in trial court cause number 28,441-B in the 181st District Court for Randall County. The Court 

construed this filing as an amended notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(f); Few v. State, 230 S.W.3d 

184, 190 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007).
#### STATE of Louisiana in the Interest of G.P. and G.P., Jr.

No. 2012-CJ-0811.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 18, 2012.

In re D.P.; — Other; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Juvenile Court of Orleans Parish, No. TR-D-20050083; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2012-C-0199 C/W 2012-C-0226 C/W 2012-C-0227.

Granted and remanded to the trial court for the reasons set forth in *State of Louisiana in the Interest of G.P. and G.P., Jr.,*12-0718 (La.4/4/12), 85 So.3d. 129.