alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      23.1




Consent
                of Independent Registered Public Accounting
                Firm




The
      Board
      of Directors


RC2
      Corporation:




Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
      statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-50957, 333-50959, 333-58035, 333-58037,
      333-81705, 333-91158, 333-91236, and 333-133238) of RC2 Corporation of our
      reports dated February 29, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets
      of RC2 Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, and the
      related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash
      flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007,
      and the related financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal
      control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear
      in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of RC2
      Corporation.




As
      described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
      adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
      – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109," effective January 1,
      2007.






/s/
      KPMG
      LLP


Chicago,
      Illinois


February
      29, 2008
Department of the United States Air Force LogoBiography
                  United States Air Force060609-F-JZ507-060.JPG
            EDWARD  C. ALDRIDGE JR.Edward C. Aldridge was the 16th secretary of the Air Force.
He was born in Houston in 1938 and spent his youth in Shreveport, La. He received a bachelor of science degree in aeronautical engineering from Texas Agricultural and Mechanical University in 1960, and a master of science degree, also in aeronautical engineering, from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1962.
Prior to joining the Department of Defense in 1967, Aldridge held various staff and management positions with the Douglas Aircraft Co., Missile and Space Division, in Santa Monica, Calif., and in Washington, D.C.
In 1967 he joined the staff of the assistant secretary of defense for systems analysis as an operations research analyst and then served as director of the Strategic Defensive Division until July 1972. He also served as an adviser to the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks in Helsinki and Vienna.
He re-entered private industry in 1972 as a senior manager with LTV Aerospace Corp. in Dallas for a year until he was named senior management associate in the Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President, Washington, D.C.
Returning to the Department of Defense in February 1974, Aldridge served as deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategic programs until March 1976. He was then selected to be the director of planning and evaluation, a principal adviser to the secretary of defense in the planning and program evaluation of U.S. military forces and support structure.
He was named vice president, National Policy and Strategic Systems Group for the Systems Planning Corp., Arlington, Va., in March 1977. Aldridge was responsible for the corporation's study and analysis activities in the areas of strategic and conventional forces and long-range strategic planning.
In August 1981 he became undersecretary of the Air Force with additional responsibility for providing overall direction, guidance and supervision for Air Force space programs, including launch and on-orbit operations, and planning for future space capabilities. Prior to the space shuttle Challenger accident in January 1986, Aldridge was in astronaut training in preparation for his participation as a payload specialist on the first shuttle mission from Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif. He assumed his present duties in June 1986.
His work in various assignments has earned him numerous awards. Among these are the Secretary of Defense Meritorious Civilian Service Award, Department of Defense Distinguished Civilian Service Award and Department of Defense Distinguished Public Service Award. He has been named a distinguished college of engineering alumnus from Texas A&M University and was the 1985 recipient of the American Astronautical Society Military Astronautics Award.
(Current as of January 1987)Department of the Air Force Logo
#### Kelly Ann MILTON v. Ernest Derry MILTON.

No. 2011-C-1168.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Milton, Ernest Derry; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 2008-002082; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1589.

Denied.

VICTORY and KNOLL, JJ., would grant.
Exhibit 31.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Roy Dalene, certify that:  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc.;  1. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  3. I am the Companys certifying officer and am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to me, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  4. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors:  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial reporting.   Date: March 29, 2007        By: /s/   Roy Dalene Name:  Roy Dalene Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### Bennet F. SCHAUFFLER, Regional Director of the Fourth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board v. HIGHWAY TRUCK DRIVERS & HELPERS, LOCAL 107, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, and Warehouse Employees Union Local 169, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Appellants.

No. 12990.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Feb. 16, 1960.

Decided April 29, 1960.

Richard H. Markowitz, Philadelphia, Pa. (Richard Kirschner, Wilderman & Markowitz, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

Winthrop A. Johns, Washington, D. C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, Jacques Schurre, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge and STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We are informed by counsel that the National Labor Relations Board has decided that no violation of Section 8(b) (4) (D), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158, has been committed and that a motion for reconsideration has been denied. No substantial issue remains for our determination and it is obvious that the preliminary injunction appealed from is no longer viable.

Accordingly we will vacate the judgment of the court below and remand the case to the end that the appellants may make application to the court below for the discharge of the preliminary injunction. 182 F.Supp. 556.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SEHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BROADVISION
INC.'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE THREE  MONTHS  ENDED  MARCH  31,  2000 AS
REPORTED  IN ITS FORM 10-Q FOR THE  PERIOD  THEN ENDED AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FILED WITH THE  SECURITIES  AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<SECURITIES>                    0

<CASH>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                   39,752
<ALLOWANCES>                    (1,746)
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                417,991
<PP&E>                          34,018
<DEPRECIATION>                  (12,036)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  458,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           90,501
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        327,530
<OTHER-SE>                      36,208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    458,854
<SALES>                         40,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                61,501
<CGS>                           2,064
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   17,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                34,570
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              7,248
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 16,442
<INCOME-TAX>                    6,406
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             10,036
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    10,036
<EPS-BASIC>                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.04



</TABLE>
#### Loc T. NGUYEN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D11-98.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Feb. 25, 2011.

J. Jervis Wise, of Bjorn E. Brunvand, P.A., Clearwater, for Petitioner.

Pamela J. Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence in case no. 2004-CF-3907, in the Circuit Court in and for Orange County, Florida. *See*Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

GRIFFIN, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
#### Ivan HAWTHORNE, James Taylor and Franklin Mills of Winnsboro, L.L.C. v. EST, L.L.C. and Charles B. Parker.

No. 2011-CC-2547.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 2011.

In re Franklin Mills of Winnsboro L.L.C.; Hawthorne, Ivan et al.; Taylor, James; — Plaintiffs); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Franklin, 5th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 41943A; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,960-CW.

Denied.
#### James Henry BORDEN, Jr. v. STATE of Alabama.

CR-02-1314.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Oct. 17, 2008.

Angela L. Setzer and Bryan A. Stevenson, Montgomery, for appellant.

William H. Pryor, Jr., and Troy King, attys. gen., and A. Vernon Barnett IV, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.

*After Remand by the Alabama Supreme Court*

McMILLAN, Judge.

The opinion issued on September 26, 2008, is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted therefor.

*948In *Ex parte Borden,*60 So.3d 940 (Ala.2007), the Alabama Supreme Court reversed the judgment of this court and remanded the case for further proceedings. The Supreme Court held that Borden’s ineffective-assistanee-of-eounsel claims were not waived for failure to comply with Rule 28(a)(1), Ala. R.App. P., and that his juror-misconduct claims were preserved for appellate review. The Supreme Court stated that this court’s judgment with regard to the juror-misconduct claims appeared to conflict with *Ex parte Rhone,*900 So.2d 455 (Ala.2004), and “place[d] a burden on Borden to secure a ruling on his proposed amendment to his Rule 32 petition when the amendment should be freely allowed if it is necessary for a full determination on the merits and if the amendment does not unduly prejudice the opposing party or unduly delay the hearing.”

Because the trial court dismissed Borden’s petition without considering the additional facts set out in his amendment, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand this case for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion. See *Ex parte Rhone,*900 So.2d at 458 (stating that “only grounds such as actual prejudice or undue delay will support a trial court’s refusal to allow, or to consider, an amendment to a Rule 32 petition”).

On remand, the trial court should allow the State the opportunity to answer the juror-misconduct allegations in the amendment and should conduct any proceedings necessary to address these claims. In light of our disposition of this case, we pretermit consideration of Borden’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims. A return should be filed with this court within 35 days from the date of this opinion.

ORIGINAL OPINION WITHDRAWN; OPINION SUBSTITUTED; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS. 

BASCHAB, P.J., and WISE and WELCH, JJ., concur. SHAW, J., concurs in the result.
Exhibit 3.4
 Delaware
 
 The First State
 I, HARRIET SMITH WINDSOR, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DO HEREBY CERTIFY
THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF BRIGHAM EXPLORATION
COMPANY, FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE, A.D. AT 12:12 OCLOCK P.M.
 A FILED COPY OF THIS CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO THE NEW CASTLE COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS.
 2721671 8100
    
    (SEAL)
    
    /s/ Harriet Smith Windsor060582898
    
    
    
    Harriet Smith Windsor, Secretary of StateAUTHENTICATION: 4834727DATE: 06-16-06




---



##### 



State of DelawareSecretary of StateDivisionof CorporationsDelivered 12:44 PM
06/16/2006FILED 12:12 PM 06/16/2006SRV 060582898 
2721671 FILE




---



##### 



th
 BRIGHAM EXPLORATION COMPANYBy:

/s/ Ben M. BrighamBen M. BrighamChairman of the Board,
President & Chief Executive Officer
EX-10.2






Exhibit 10.2




WAIVER 




     In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation
in the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby
voluntarily waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my
compensation or benefits that are required to comply with the regulation issued by the
Department of the Treasury as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008.



     I acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation, bonus,
incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called
“golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they
relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired
through the TARP Capital Purchase Program.



     This waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state
related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation
a claim for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise receive, any challenge to the
process by which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect
of these regulations on my employment relationship.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Waiver effective as of the 23rd day of
December, 2008.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

[Name]
	 	 
	 

	 	[Title]
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-15-00221-CV

____________________

TOM HAMPTON AND CONNIE HAMPTON D/B/A BAR H COUNTRY 

STORE & BAR-B-QUE, Appellants

V.

PETROTEX FUELS, INC., Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 60th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. B-181,869

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

The appellants, Tom Hampton and Connie Hampton d/b/a Bar H Country 

Store & Bar-B-Que, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is 

voluntarily made by the appellants prior to any decision of this Court. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed notice of appeal. We grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeal.
2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

 HOLLIS HORTON

 Justice

 

Submitted on August 26, 2015

Opinion Delivered August 27, 2015

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


             Subsidiary of Waypoint Financial            State of Organization
------------------------------------------------   -----------------------------
Waypoint Bank                                          United States
Waypoint Financial Investment Corporation.             Delaware
New Service Corporation.                               Pennsylvania
Waypoint Service Corporation                           Pennsylvania
Waypoint Brokerage Services, Inc.                      Pennsylvania
Waypoint Insurance Services, Inc.                      Pennsylvania
Owen Insurance Inc.                                    Pennsylvania
Advanced Real Estate Associates.                       Pennsylvania
Lenders Support Group Inc.                             Pennsylvania

                Subsidiary of Waypoint Bank              State of Organization
------------------------------------------------   -----------------------------
Harris Delaware Corporation                            Delaware
York Financial Investment Corporation.                 Delaware
H. S. Service Corporation.                             Pennsylvania
First Harrisburg Service Corporation.                  Pennsylvania
C.B.L. Service Corporation                             Pennsylvania
AVSTAR Mortgage Corporation                            Pennsylvania
<Page>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


            CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PRAECIS PHARMACEUTICALS
INCORPORATED (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kevin F. McLaughlin, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Kevin F. McLaughlin
---------------------------------
Name:  Kevin F. McLaughlin
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  March 19, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          25,803
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          16,370
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    510,771
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         418,030
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           416,572
<LOANS>                                        830,574
<ALLOWANCE>                                     16,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,875,091
<DEPOSITS>                                     833,822
<SHORT-TERM>                                   425,369
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             21,145
<LONG-TERM>                                    453,592
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     141,163
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,875,091
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 52,963
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               50,085
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   410
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               103,458
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              24,391
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,216
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           40,242
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,310
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (144)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 37,643
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,950
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       9,950
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,374
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.91
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.01
<LOANS-NON>                                     14,142
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,665
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                13,124
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      617
<RECOVERIES>                                        77
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               16,894
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            16,894
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>