alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2

	
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Registrant and Sallyanne K.
 Ballweg dated December 13, 2007





(THE FIRST OF LONG ISLAND CORPORATION
LETTERHEAD)


December 15,
2008                    


Ms. Sallyanne K. Ballweg


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
Re:

	
Letter Employment Agreement dated December
 13, 2007 (the “Agreement”)





Dear Ms. Ballweg:


          This
will serve to confirm that we have agreed to amend the captioned Agreement in
the following respects:


          1.          The
phrase “and within ten (10) days after” is hereby deleted from the first
paragraph of Section 4.1 of the Agreement.


          2.          The
following Section 4.4 is hereby added to the Agreement:


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
                 “4.4.        In
 the event that you shall become entitled to a Termination Payment pursuant to
 Section 4.1 or Section 4.2 hereof, such payment shall be made to you within
 ten (10) days after the expiration of a period of six (6) months measured
 from the termination of your employment or your resignation, as the case may
 be. Subject to the foregoing limitation, the date of payment shall be
 determined by FLIC in its sole discretion.”

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
          3.          The
 following paragraphs “F” and “G” are hereby added to Section 7 of the
 Agreement:


	
 


	
 

	
                 “F.          “Termination”
 shall mean a separation from service, within the meaning of Internal Revenue
 Code Section 409A, (i) which results from a decision of the Bank to terminate
 your employment and (ii) by reason of which each of us anticipates that no
 further services will be provided by you hereunder subsequent to the
 effective date thereof.”

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
                 “G.          “Resignation”
 shall mean a separation from service, within the meaning of Internal Revenue
 Code Section 409A, (i) which results from a decision by you to resign your
 employment (including resignation for Good Reason) and (ii) by reason of
 which each of us anticipates that no further services will be provided by you
 hereunder subsequent to the effective date thereof.”

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
          Please
 confirm that the foregoing accurately sets forth our understanding by signing
 and returning the enclosed copy of this letter. The Agreement will thereupon
 be deemed amended in the foregoing respects.





4







	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
Very truly yours,


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
THE FIRST OF LONG ISLAND CORPORATION


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
By:

	
/s/MICHAEL N. VITTORIO


	
 

	
 

	



	
 

	
 

	
MICHAEL N. VITTORIO


	
 

	
 

	
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Accepted and Agreed this

	
 

	
 


	
19th day of December 2008

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
/s/SALLYANNE K. BALLWEG

	
 

	
 


	


	
 

	
 


	
SALLYANNE K.
 BALLWEG

	
 

	
 





5
News United States Air Force
 PACAF civil engineers improve airfield repair skillsPublished Sept. 16, 2016
                        
                        By Senior Airman Stephen G. Eigel
                        
                        
                        18th Wing Public Affairs
                **KADENA AIR BASE, Japan (AFNS) --**
                Civil engineer squadrons from Kadena, Yokota and Misawa Air Bases teamed up here with the Air Force Civil Engineer Center to conduct training for the new Rapid Airfield Damage Repair technique Sept. 12-15.Operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and other locations have highlighted a need for better methods to quickly and effectively establish or improve airfields. Craters, spalls and other conditions that limit airfield use can create costly delays not adequately resolved by older repair techniques.The AFCEC, located at Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, selected Kadena AB as a test base for the RADR program because of its key location in the Pacific. "This is a significant step forward that provides new capabilities in addition to traditional rapid runway repair," said Master Sgt. Matthew Novack, the 18th Civil Engineer Squadron section chief of requirements and optimization. "This is the first time we have been able to conduct operations like this on an active runway in more than a decade."During RADR training, Airmen cleared debris from the surface of the flightline using heavy equipment. Next, they cut a square around the damaged areas with specialized saws, then removed the remaining concrete. After the concrete is removed the holes are filled with a low-strength concrete and capped with a rapid-set hard concrete. The process can be done quickly in combat situations so airfield operations can resume. It’s estimated that 3,000 aircraft of any size or weight can pass over the restored area without causing degradation to the runway. The new process allows for six times the repairs with less than double the output.The previous method for repairing flightlines, known as rapid runway repair, was introduced in the late 1950s and was refined in the 1960s. This operation allowed engineers to repair three large craters formed from 750-pound bombs within four hours after damage was made.  "(Rapid runway repair) was a way that was ingrained in the Air Force for around 50 years," Capt. Benjamin Carlson, the AFCEC Airfield Damage Repair officer in charge said in a previous article. "This is a new way of doing things that is more beneficial and cuts down on repair times."Col. Anthony Davit, the AFCEC director of readiness, said RADR allows teams to repair around 18 craters in roughly 6 1⁄2 hours. He said he is looking forward to having these units take the new process back to their home stations, increasing the readiness of the Indo-Asia Pacific region.AFCEC 



airfield 



Kadena AB 



Misawa AB 



civil engineer 



Yokota AB 



runway repair 



PACAF
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-4 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2015 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2011, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-4 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC./s/ Jennifer M. DavisName: Jennifer M. DavisTitle: Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 29, 2016/s/ Rich MorrinName: Rich MorrinTitle: Chief Operating OfficerDate: March 29, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DSI TOYS,
INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                         383,690
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,999,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (204,330)
<INVENTORY>                                  6,437,418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,699,364
<PP&E>                                       4,750,244
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,497,672)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,207,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,434,614
<BONDS>                                      7,495,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,190
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,071,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,207,120
<SALES>                                     73,624,398
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            73,624,398
<CGS>                                       55,285,501
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,245,064
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               231,968
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               145,096
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,360,067
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,034,266)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,329,323)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,704,943)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (480,754)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,185,697)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.00)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Sontra Medical Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas W. Davison, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    THOMAS W.
DAVISON             
|Thomas W. Davison                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer



February 16, 2005
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                            o One North Charles            o Phone: 410 539-7940
                              Baltimore, Maryland 21201


      REPORT ON MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM SERVICING
       STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR
                                MORTGAGE BANKERS



                         Independent Accountants' Report



Board of Directors
Ryland Mortgage Company

We  have  examined  management's  assertion  that  Ryland  Mortgage  Company  (a
wholly-owned  subsidiary of The Ryland Group,  Inc.) and  subsidiaries  complied
with  the  minimum  servicing  standards  set  forth  in  the  Mortgage  Bankers
Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS
(USAP)  during the year ended  December 31, 1996,  included in the  accompanying
report titled REPORT OF MANAGEMENT.  Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those requirements.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on  management's   assertion  about  the  Company's   compliance  based  on  our
examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's compliance with those
requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered  necessary in
the circumstances.  We believe that our examination  provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal  determination on the
Company's compliance with specified requirements.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the  Company  complied  with the
aforementioned  requirements during the period ended December 31, 1996 is fairly
stated, in all material respects.

                                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

January 31, 1997



       Ernst & Young LLP is a member of Ernst & Young International, Ltd.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF VERSATA, INC.

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

REGARDING
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Eugene Wong, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Versata, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the Company), do hereby certify that:



1.    The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended October 31, 2002 (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.    Information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:

/s/ EUGENE WONGEugene Wong Chief Executive Officer and Director






|Date: |  | March 26, 2003
|----- |  | --------------
News United States Air Force
 James delves into space, missile warning mission with Buckley AirmenPublished July 13, 2016
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Nicholas Rau
                        
                        
                        460th Space Wing Public Affairs
                **BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE, Colo. (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James engaged with Airmen from Buckley Air Force Base July 7 and saw firsthand the space and missile warning mission that the base executes daily.During her time here, James viewed the 460th Space Wing’s Mission Control Station and spoke with space operators in their work centers and on the operations floor.“The best part about showcasing the Airmen and the (Space-Based Infrared System) mission to Secretary James during her visit today was two-fold,” said Lt. Col. Keith Jansa, 8th Space Warning Squadron commander. “First, being able to let those that actually operate SBIRS on a day-to-day basis explain what they do to contribute to the safety and security of our nation and the safety and security of the men and women downrange in harm’s way was greatly appreciated. “Second, it was nice having Secretary James leave with an understanding that we here at Buckley execute the SBIRS mission from a total force construct,” he continued. “Our foreign mission partners and Airmen from the (Air Force) Reserve play a huge part in the success of the overall SBIRS mission.”While her time was limited, Airmen were thankful to be able to showcase the critical mission that the wing performs without fail. With the new Block 10 upgrade, the wing continues to seamlessly provide space and missile warning for the nation and its allies."It was great to visit today with our top Air Force leader and see our Airmen showcase the impressive work they do for our nation and our allies to Secretary James,” said Col. John Wagner, the 460th SW commander. “They truly 'have the watch' with advanced warning and global vigilance, and I'm extremely proud of their service and sacrifice."SecAF 



Deborah Lee James 



space 



missile 



Buckley AFB
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-13271

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00098-RWS-RGV-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MOHAMMED BAH,

a.k.a. Little,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(August 29, 2016)

Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 15-13271 Date Filed: 08/29/2016 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Michael J. Trost, appointed counsel for Mohammed Bah in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 

1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record 

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. 

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of 

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bah’s convictions and 

sentences are AFFIRMED. Bah’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED 

AS MOOT. 

Case: 15-13271 Date Filed: 08/29/2016 Page: 2 of 2
583 A.2d 350

#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF CAROLINE J. GRADEL, DECEASED.

March 30, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
IN CONNECTION WITH ITS INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING IN JULY 1997, THE COMPANY
CONVERTED FROM AN S CORPORATION TO A C CORPORATION. EARNINGS PER SHARE DATA ARE
BASED ON PRO FORMA NET INCOME WHICH WAS CALCULATED AS IF THE COMPANY HAD BEEN A
C CORPORATION FOR THE ENTIRE PERIOD.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,670
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,937
<INVENTORY>                                      6,318
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,075
<PP&E>                                          45,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,098
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           189
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,500
<SALES>                                        226,918
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               226,918
<CGS>                                           91,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  214,279
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,123
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,298
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,516
<INCOME-TAX>                                       250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,266
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,266
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary fiancial informationextracted fromthe balance
sheet as of December 31, 1999, and statements of operations for the 12 months
ended Deember 31, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference tosuch
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         893,849
<SECURITIES>                                   130,403
<RECEIVABLES>                                  913,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (190,328)
<INVENTORY>                                    201,815
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,960,930
<PP&E>                                       1,775,855
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,583,602)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,578,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,087,067
<BONDS>                                         21,459
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          950,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,250
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,501,562)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,578,214
<SALES>                                      3,566,307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,592,969
<CGS>                                        2,926,459
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,926,459
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,556,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,323,795)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,323,795)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,323,795)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.77)


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jarvis Jermaine SHELVIN.

No. 2010-KO-1225.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 17, 2010.

In re Shelvin, Jarvis Jermaine; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. K, No. 110,925; *19to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 09-1283.

Denied.
**Exhibit
      12.1****Summit
      Properties Partnership, L.P.****Calculation
      of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges****Year
      Ended December 31, 2004**Net
      Income
    
    $
      159,733Interest:Expense
      incurred
    
    41,058Amortization of
      deferred financing costs
    
    1,551Rental
      fixed charges
    
    93Total
    
    $
      202,435Fixed
      charges:Interest
      expense
    
    $
      41,058Interest
      capitalized
    
    9,376Dividends to
      preferred unitholders in operating parthership
    
    4,813Rental
      fixed charges
    
    93Amortization of
      deferred financing costs
    
    1,551Total
    
    $
      56,891Ratio
      of earnings to fixed charges
    
    3.56