alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**EXCHANGE
      ACT RULE 15D-14(B) AND**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation
      (the ”Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Haddon B. Libby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b)
      and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
      Oxley Act of 2002, that:





i.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





ii.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation and will
      be
      retained by U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








By:
            /s/
                Haddon B. LibbyName:
            Haddon
                B. LibbyTitle:
            Chief
                Financial OfficerDate:
            October
                25, 2006
Exhibit 32A

Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                                                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350

Solely for the purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of WidePoint
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on their knowledge, that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 ( the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ STEVE L. KOMAR Steve L.
KomarChief Executive Officer

/s/ JAMES T. MCCUBBIN James T.
McCubbinChief Financial Officer

Date:  August 17, 2005
#### Ranier GILLIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D10-3226.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 9, 2011.

Ranier Gillis, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the post-conviction record, *see*Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I William W. Krippaehne Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 11, 2004



/s/    WILLIAM W. KRIPPAEHNE JR.William W. Krippaehne Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer
#### BOSSIER PARISH SCHOOL BOARD v. RICHARD LEBLANC ARCHITECTS, INC., et al.

No. 2010-C-2396.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 17, 2010.

In re Bossier Parish School Board; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 128,556; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,632-CA.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Nicholas Demond PITREE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2009-OK-2491.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Pitree, Nicholas Demond; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 8879-04; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 08-1381.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, B. James Rubin, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tripos, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

	a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	c)	disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 6, 2004

 

     /s/ B. James Rubin
     B. James Rubin
#### Ronnie H. CARROLL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-1656.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 22, 2000.

Decided Jan. 8, 2001.

W. Daniel Mayes, Aiken, SC, for appellant. Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, John Berkley Grimball, Assistant United States Attorney, Deana R. Ertl Lombardi, Chief, Teresa H. Abbott, Assistant Regional, Social Security Administration, Denver, CO, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Ronnie H. Carroll appeals the district court’s order upholding the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security finding that Carroll is not disabled and not entitled to disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Carroll v. Apfel,*No. CA-95-765-22 (D.S.C. Feb. 17, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF the LOTTERY, Petitioner, v. Anna Maria CURCIO, Respondent.

No. 1D11-3130.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 12, 2011.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and James A. Peters, Special Counsel, Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

Lawrence G. Walters of Walters Law Group, Altamonte Springs; Howard S. Marks of Burr & Forman, LLP, Winter Park, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida, Department of the Lottery, petitions this court for a writ of prohibition or certiorari. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the request for prohibition relief but grant the petition for writ of certiorari.

Respondent Curcio holds a ticket which she contends entitles her to collect a prize of $500,000 from the Department. When her request for payment was denied, she brought suit in the Circuit Court for Leon County. The amended complaint seeks to recover damages under four causes of action: breach of contract (Count I), equitable estoppel (Count II), unfair and deceptive trade practices (Count III), and misleading advertising (Count IV).

The Department argues that Curcio’s claims are barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity and this court should issue a writ of prohibition, directing that the circuit court litigation be resolved in its favor for that reason. The trial court has not yet ruled on these defense theories and the petition, insofar as it seeks a writ of prohibition, is therefore denied. *See Campbell v. Lungstrum,*732 So.2d 437 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

The Department also invokes this Court’s certiorari jurisdiction to review the trial court’s order of June 6, 2011, which granted Curcio’s motion to compel and denied the Department’s motions for protective order with regard to discovery. We find that the sovereign immunity de*932fense to Counts III and IV raises questions of law and can be resolved without resort to discovery. We also find that the court must rule on the sovereign immunity defense to Counts I & II before authorizing discovery on the merits of Curcio’s claims. The discovery ordered by the trial court is overbroad for this purpose. We grant certiorari and quash the trial court’s order of June 6, 2011. The trial court shall issue an amended order which authorizes only the discovery necessary to resolve the sovereign immunity defense to Counts III & IV.

PETITION GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

BENTON, C.J., HAWKES and RAY, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1****Rule 13a-14 Certification**I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Cronos Group (the “Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the AuditCommittee of Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report information; and(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 12, 2006/s/ DENNIS J. TIETZ
BRIGADIER GENERAL JULIAN B. HADDONJulian B. Haddon was born in Pleasant Hill, Mo., on Oct. 28, 1894. He enlisted as a flying cadet on Aug. 27, 1917. From August 1917 until October 1917 he attended the School of Military Aeronautics at the University of California. He then went to the Aviation Concentration Department at Garden City, N.Y., and in December 1917 was sent to Kelly Field, Texas, to attend the Instructors School and the School of Aerial Gunnery. He was commissioned a second lieutenant in the Aviation Section, Signal Reserve, on March 7, 1918, and became an instructor in flying at Kelly Field in March 1918. 
In March 1918 he went to Camp Dick, Texas, for two months, and then to Fort Sill, Okla. In May 1918 he returned to Camp Dick and in July 1918 was assigned to the 2nd Provisional Wing at Houston, Texas. In April 1921 he was assigned to Carlstrom Field, Fla., for duty as an instructor, and in July 1921 he went to Brooks Field, Texas, for duty instructing pilots. 
In July 1925 he served in the Philippine Islands with the 3rd Pursuit Squadron at Clark Field, returning to the United States for duty at Selfridge Field, Mich., in September 1927 as Post Adjutant. In October 1928 he became a Test Pilot and Chief of the Operations Unit at Wright Field, Ohio. In March 1930 he went to Washington, D.C., for duty in the Office of the Chief of Air Corps. 
He enrolled in Air Corps Tactical School, Maxwell Field, Ala., in August 1932 and graduated in June 1933. He then became an instructor of aviation units of the Alabama National Guard in Birmingham. In July 1934 he served as Secretary of the Air Corps Tactical School at Maxwell Field. He entered the Army Industrial College, Washington, D.C., in August 1937, graduating in June 1938. 
He then returned to Maxwell Field to command the 91st School Squadron, and in September 1938 became Provost Marshal there. In April 1939 he was made Supply Officer at Maxwell Field, and then Materiel Officer of the Southeast Air Corps Training Center with headquarters at Maxwell Field in November 1940. In January 1942 he assumed command of the Air Corps Advanced Flying School, Craig Field, Ala. 
He is rated a command pilot, combat observer and technical observer. **PROMOTIONS** 
Second lieutenant in the Air Service of the Regular Army, July 1, 1920, and resigned his commission on Nov. 10, 1920. He was again commissioned in the Regular Army Air Service, as a first lieutenant, on April 2, 1921; captain (temporary), March 11, 1935; captain (permanent), Aug. 1, 1935; major (temporary), March 5, 1939; major (permanent), July 1, 1940; lieutenant colonel (temporary); July 15, 1941; colonel (temporary), Feb. 1, 1942; brigadier general (temporary), Sept. 18, 1942.
**M L** **P** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 0 518 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. ROBERT CRAIG BRITZIUS ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including April 24 , 20 2 3 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court March 16 2023

03/16/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0518
#### STATE ex rel. Phillip J. MONROE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0145.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 2011.

In re Monroe, Phillip; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. B, No. 369^407; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2009-K-1560.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. Cf. La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D).
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Mervin Patrick WHITE.

No. 2010-K-1799.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 25, 2011.

In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. N, No. 08-2390; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-KA-1071.

Granted.
#### Margie MCGLOTHLIN, et al. v. CHRISTUS ST. PATRICK HOSPITAL.

No. 2010-C-2775.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 2011.

In re Christas St. Patrick Hospital of Lake Charles; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 2005-004108; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-0278.

Granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
                    
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         71,286
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          2,928
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    75,117
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        263,425
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          265,189
<LOANS>                                       261,516
<ALLOWANCE>                                     2,016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                625,338
<DEPOSITS>                                    443,584
<SHORT-TERM>                                        0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            10,682
<LONG-TERM>                                    98,359
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          529
<OTHER-SE>                                     72,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                625,338
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                18,294
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              13,779
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                1,126
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               33,199
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             13,820
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             18,235
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          14,964
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     382
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                276
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                10,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 6,173
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      6,173
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,796
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .93
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.24
<LOANS-NON>                                         0
<LOANS-PAST>                                    1,311
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                1,983
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      42
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               2,016
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            2,016
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         2,016
        


</TABLE>
SECOND ADDENDUM TO
REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT AND NOTE 



        THIS
SECOND ADDENDUM is hereby made a part of the Revolving Credit Agreement and Note (the
“Agreement”) made and entered into by the undersigned borrower (the
“Borrower”) and the undersigned bank (the “Bank”) on July 31, 2008.
The covenants and terms described below are hereby added for the purposes of amending the
Agreement. 



        1.              The
meaning of “Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio” shall be amended to mean
          EBITDAR plus non-cash stock compensation expense minus cash taxes, cash
          dividends, treasury stock purchases and Maintenance Capital Expenditures
divided           by the sum of all required principal payments (on short and long-term
debt and           capital leases), interest and rental or lease expense.  




        2.              The
foregoing meaning of Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio shall become effective with
          the December 31, 2009, year-end financials. Until that date, the Fixed Charge
          Coverage Ratio as defined in the Agreement dated July 31, 2008, shall remain in
          full force and effect.  




        3.              In
all other respects, the warranties, covenants and other terms set out in the
          Agreement shall remain in full force and effect including, but not limited to,
          the covenant for Maintenance Capital Expenditures.  




        Dated
as of this 19 day of December, 2008. 





		
		National Research Corporation, a
		Wisconsin Corporation
	
 	By:    /s/ Patrick E. Beans
		Patrick E. Beans, CFO
	 	 
	
 	AGREED TO:
	
 	U.S. Bank, N.A.
	
 	By:    /s/ Elizabeth A. Morgan
		Elizabeth A. Morgan, Vice President