United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-1230

___________

United States of America, *

*

 Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Richard Don Smotherman, *

*

 Appellant. *

Appeals from the United States

District Court for the 

Western District of Missouri.

___________

No. 01-2092

___________

United States of America, *

*

 Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Everett A. Burmingham, *

*

 Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: March 12, 2002

Filed: April 17, 2002
2

___________

Before McMILLIAN, HEANEY and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit

Judges.

___________

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

Richard Don Smotherman and Everett Burmingham pled guilty to

manufacturing and distributing methamphetamine. Burmingham claims that the

district court erred by 1) attributing more than 110 grams of methamphetamine to him

at sentencing, and 2) sentencing him to a mandatory 60-month sentence for

possession of a firearm. After careful review of Burmingham’s sentence, we affirm.

See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Smotherman appeals his sentence, alleging that the court

incorrectly calculated the quantity of drugs attributable to him. He also contends the

court improperly attached a three-level enhancement to his sentence for his role in the

offense. We reverse and remand Smotherman’s case for resentencing. 

The district court’s factual findings at sentencing are reviewed for clear error,

and the district court’s application and construction of the Sentencing Guidelines are

reviewed de novo. United States v. Wells, 127 F.3d 739, 744 (8th Cir. 1997). At

sentencing, the district court attributed one-fourth of a pound of methamphetamine

per week to Smotherman, for the months August 1999 through December 1999. The

court erroneously converted one-fourth of a pound to 260 grams, and incorrectly

calculated the total amount of methamphetamine sold over the 20-week period to

equal 4,520 grams. This is clear error. One-fourth of a pound equals 113 grams,

resulting in a total of 2,260 grams sold over the 20 week period. 

Next, Smotherman asserts that the court erred by attributing 3,183 grams to him

based on his individual drug sales. The record shows that from October 1999 through

November 1999, Smotherman sold half a gram, 1/4 of an ounce, and one ounce of
3

methamphetamine on separate occasions, totaling approximately 36 grams. Cut once,

it amounts to 72 grams, and cut again, 144 grams, nowhere near the 3,183 grams the

court calculated. Added to the additional 454 grams that Smotherman sold in January

2000, approximately 598 grams of the drug can be attributed to him based on these

individual sales. Consequently, considering the 2,260 grams calculated above, the

court should have attributed a total of 2,858 grams of methamphetamine, or 2.8

kilograms, to Smotherman, resulting in a base offense level of 34. 

The district court clearly stated its intent to attribute a “conservative estimate

of one-fourth pound” a week to Smotherman for 20 weeks, and to take into account

multiple cuts of a series of “buys” that Smotherman made. We remand to the district

court so that it may recalculate Smotherman’s base offense level consistent with what

we believe was its original intent. 

With regard to the court’s imposition of a three-level adjustment for

Smotherman’s role in the offense, we affirm pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(b). The

facts before the district court provide a rational basis for finding that Smotherman

played a managerial or supervisory role in the distribution of methamphetamine. 

For the reasons cited above, we reverse and remand in part and affirm in part.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.