alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Department of the United States Air Force LogoBiography
                  United States Air ForceRoper
            DR. WILL ROPERDr. Will Roper is the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics. As the Air Force’s Service Acquisition Executive, Dr. Roper is responsible for and oversees Air Force research, development and acquisition activities totaling an annual budget in excess of $60 billion for more than 550 acquisition programs. In this position, Dr. Roper serves as the principal adviser to the Secretary and Chief of Staff of the Air Force for research and development, test, production and modernization efforts within the Air Force.
Prior to his current position, Dr. Roper was the founding Director of the Pentagon’s Strategic Capabilities Office. Established in 2012, the SCO imagines new—often unexpected and game-changing—uses of existing government and commercial systems: extending their shelf-life and restoring surprise to the military’s playbook. Since 2012, SCO has grown from an annual budget of $50 million to the current $1.5 billion request in the President’s 2018 budget with projects spanning new concepts such as hypervelocity artillery, multi-purpose missiles, autonomous fast-boats, smartphone-navigating weapons, big-data-enabled sensing, 3D-printed systems, standoff arsenal planes, fighter avatars and fighter-dispersed swarming micro-drones which formed the world’s then-largest swarm of 103 systems. During his tenure as SCO Director, Dr. Roper served on the Department’s 2018 National Defense Strategy Steering Group, Cloud Executive Steering Group and Defense Modernization Team.
Previously, Dr. Roper served as the Acting Chief Architect at the Missile Defense Agency where he developed 11 new systems, including the current European Defense architecture, advanced drones, and classified programs. Before this, he worked at MIT Lincoln Laboratory and served as a missile defense advisor to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics.**EDUCATION**
2001 Bachelor of Science in Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta
2002 Master of Science in Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta
2010 Doctorate in Mathematics, Oxford University, England**CAREER CHRONOLOGY**
January 2006 – June 2010, Missile Defense Advisor, MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Washington, D.C.
August 2010 – August 2011, Member, Missile Defense Advisory Committee, Missile Defense Agency, Washington D.C.
June 2010 – August 2012, Acting Chief Architect, Missile Defense Agency, Washington D.C.
August 2012 – February 2018, Director, Strategic Capabilities Office, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Washington, D.C.
February 2018 – present, Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisitions, Technology and Logistics, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, Washington, D.C.**MAJOR AWARDS AND HONORS**
Department of Defense Medal for Distinguished Public Service
Secretary of Defense’s Award for Excellence
USD/AT&L Award for Innovation
MDA Contractor of the Year
MDA Innovation and Technology Awards
Rhodes Scholar

(Current as of August 2019)Department of the Air Force Logo
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statements of financial condition and the consolidated
statements of operation of Unified Financial Services, Inc. filed as a part of
the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such report.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,566,394
<SECURITIES>                                   858,154
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,439,985
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2,041)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,994,617
<PP&E>                                       3,937,382
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,472,022)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,200,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,264,444
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        21,728
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,486
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,200,342
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,249,217
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,370,121
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,896,629
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                16,135
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (654,786)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (376,853)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (277,933)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (277,933)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 29, 2010

y0125 

# Order

January 29, 2010

139286(74)

_____________ _______________ _____________ In re Estate of ALEXANDER CLARK, III, Deceased.

_____________ _______________ _____________ JULIE CLARK, Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 139286 COA: 282000 Oakland Probate Ct: RICHARD SIRIANI, Personal Represen tative of 2006-305129-DE the Estate of ALEXANDER CLARK, III, FREDERICK CLARK, a nd ROBERT CLARK, Respondents-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for r econsideration of this Court’s October 26, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          30,928
<SECURITIES>                                     8,709
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,619
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,907
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,923
<PP&E>                                          29,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,197
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           218
<OTHER-SE>                                     127,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                         18,644
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,621
<CGS>                                              845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,995
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   418
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,708
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,345
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,609
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,363
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.01



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Sontra Medical Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos.
333-92414, 333-101517 and 333-106201) and the Registration Statement of Sontra Medical Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 333-109716), of our report dated January 30, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December
31, 2003 and 2002, which is part of this Form 10-KSB.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Wolf & Company, P.C.
|Wolf & Company, P.C.    
|Boston, Massachusetts   
|March 15, 2004
EXHIBIT 13

                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with this annual report on Form 20-F of Tevecap S.A. for the
period ended December 31, 2002, Leila Abraham Loria, Chief Executive Officer of
Tevecap S.A. and Carlos Eduardo Malagoni, Chief Financial Officer of Tevecap
S.A., each hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. this Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2. the information contained in this Form 20-F for the period ended December 31,
2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Tevecap S.A.

Date: June 30, 2004          /s/ Leila Abraham Loria
                             -----------------------
                             Leila Abraham Loria
                             Chief Executive Officer


Date: June 30, 2004          /s/ Carlos Eduardo Malagoni
                             ---------------------------
                             Carlos Eduardo Malagoni
                             Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Tevecap S.A. and will be retained by Tevecap S.A. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       58
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Killko Caballero, the Chief Executive Officerof First Virtual Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), and Timothy Rogers, theChief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the bestof his knowledge:

 

**1.            **The Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

** **

**2.            **The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by thePeriodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period coveredby the Periodic Report.

 
| Dated: August 14, 2002  |   |                    |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                    |   |                    |
| /s/ Killko Caballero    |   | /s/ Timothy Rogers      |   |
| Killko  Caballero       |   | Timothy  Rogers         |
| Chief Executive Officer |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### Rodney J. BODDICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D10-3480.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Jan. 28, 2011.

Rodney J. Boddice, Bowling Green, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Boddice appeals from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm as to each of the issues raised by Boddice, save one. In his motion, Bod-dice alleged that he did not receive sufficient jail credit for time served after his violation of probation arrest. The trial court failed to address this issue. On remand, it is directed to do so.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
422 A.2d 1177

#### Michael et ux., Appellants, v. Estate of Michael et al.

Argued December 4, 1978.

Charles P. Gelso, for appellants; Jerry B. Chariton, for appellee.

Before PRICE, SPAETH and WATKINS, JJ.

The order of the lower court is hereby affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of First Industrial, L.P. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-43641) of our
report dated February 16, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of First Industrial, L.P. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for
the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 and the financial statement
schedule as of December 31, 1998, which is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K and of our report dated February 16, 1999, on our audits of the
combined financial statements of the Other Real Estate Partnerships as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and
1996, which is also included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.










                                    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 30, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jul-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Aug-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jul-31-1998
<CASH>                                         14,439,807
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,876,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                   950,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               28,785,633
<PP&E>                                         6,237,353
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,257,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 51,920,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,797,663
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       165,256
<OTHER-SE>                                     38,267,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   51,920,501
<SALES>                                        19,713,979
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               45,246,848
<CGS>                                          8,318,307
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  39,645,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               177,426
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               734,550
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             406,045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,424,327
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,240,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,184,327
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,184,327
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .21
        


</TABLE>
#### COMBS v. SNYDER, As Secretary of the Treasury et al.

Civ. No. 4576-51.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

Argued Nov. 27, 1951.

Decided Nov. 29, 1951.

Judgment Affirmed March 3, 1952.

See 72 S.Ct. 562.

Myron G. Ehrlich of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Ross O’Donoghue, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C, for defendants. Charles M. Irelan, U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C, also entered an appearance on behalf of defendants.

Before EDGERTON, Circuit Judge, WILKIN and YOUNGDAHL, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff seeks an injunction to restrain enforcement of Chapter 27A of the Internal Revenue Code, enacted October 20, 1951 by Public Law No. 183, Section 471,. 82nd Cong., 1st Sess., 26 U.S.C.A. § 3285. This Chapter imposes a 10 per cent excise tax on wagers, as defined, and an occupational stamp tax of $50 a year on persons liable for the excise tax. It requires such persons to register their names, residences, and places of business, and the names and residences of persons who receive wagers for them or for whom they receivé wagers. Violation of the Act exposes the violator to.criminal penalties.

The plaintiff’s complaint states in substance that he desires to engage in the business covered by the Act. It states that he has tendered $50 and applied for the stamp which would evidence his compliance with the Act. The stamp has not been issued because he has declined to make some of the required disclosures. His complaint alleges that these disclosures, if made, would expose him to criminal penalties. It also alleges that the Act is unconstitutional.

We think some of the constitutional questions the plaintiff asks us to decide are substantial enough to give this three-judge court jurisdiction. We think the Act constitutional. -But we think it unnecessary to discuss the constitutional ques*532tions in the circumstances of this case. The complaint clearly implies, and plaintiff’s counsel conceded in oral argument, that what plaintiff seeks is the intervention of the court for the protection of a criminal business. Nothing is better settled than that it is within the discretion of a court of equity to deny its aid to one who does not come into court with clean hands. New things arc clearer than that one who comes seeking protection for conduct that he concedes to be criminal has unclean hands within the meaning of this principle. The plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is therefore denied and the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint is granted.
H. R. 1434 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 896 Pittsburgh 

Street in Springdale, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Rachel Carson Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. RACHEL CARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 896 Pittsburgh Street in Springdale, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Rachel Carson Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Rachel Carson Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 90 (Monday, June 5, 1995)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D678]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings

  No committee meetings were held.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 29, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00245

- CR

Vanessa CAMERON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 226th Judici al District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR4286C The Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

O n March 31, 20 20 , we abated this appeal to the trial court to make findings of fact with

respect to whether any sealed motions or orders were missing from the clerk’s record and, if so, whether they were lost or destroyed and could be replaced by a copy or recreated by agreement of the parties. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5(e). A supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial

court’s written findings and a sealed supplemental clerk’s record containing the omitted motions filed by appellant under seal and the related order s have now b een filed in this court

. A ccordingly, it is ORDERED that this appeal is REINSTATED on the docket of this court

. T he appellant’s brief is due within thirty (30) days from the date of this order.

_________________________ ________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of April, 2020

.

______________________ _____________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
#### Jeffrey Owen MEAUX v. WENDY’S INTERNATIONAL, INC., F.J.B. Construction, Inc., ACE Insurance Company, and XYZ Insurance Company.

No. 2010-C-2613.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

*322In re Wendy’s International, Inc.; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certio-rari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 639-145;' to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-CA-lll.

Granted.
#### Sarah ADAMS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-2466.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 31, 2011.

Sarah Adams, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Brooke Poland, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking a belated appeal of the judgment and sentence rendered on June 7, 2010, in Washington County circuit court case number 09-000348-CF-MA, is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall be furnished to the clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. If petitioner qualifies for the appointment of counsel at *975public expense, the lower tribunal is directed to appoint counsel to represent her in the appeal authorized by this opinion.

VAN NORTWICK, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.