alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 302 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1260 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AUGUST 1, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 6301 Highway 58 in Harrison, Tennessee, 

as the ‘‘Claude Ramsey Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLAUDE RAMSEY POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 6301 Highway 58 in Harrison, 

6 Tennessee, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Claude 

7 Ramsey Post Office’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1260 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Claude Ramsey Post 

5 Office’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Calendar No. 302 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1260 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice’’. rison, Tennessee, as the ‘‘Claude Ramsey Post al Service located at 6301 Highway 58 in HarAUGUST 1, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2



Certifications



I, Edward Escudero, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Petro Financial Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2004                
|/s/ Edward Escudero                  
|(Edward Escudero)                    
|Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### James JACOBS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-4894.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 11, 2011.

James Jacobs, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. *See Baker v. State,*878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).

PADOVANO, ROBERTS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
#### Eddy OLIVER, Oscarlene Nixon and Mildred Goodwin, et al. v. ORLEANS PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, et al.

No. 2011-CC-0906.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 2011.

In re State of Louisiana; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. N, No. 05-12244; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-C-0436.

Stay denied; writ denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5591]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentlewoman from Ohio [Ms. Kaptur] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Ms. KAPTUR addressed the House. Her remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
#### W.T.A., Individually and as Co-Administrator of the Estate of the Minor Child, A.J.A v. M.Y., et al.

No. 2011-C-0491.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2011.

In re Yeager, Marcie; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 97-5810-B; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-434.

Denied.

KNOLL and CLARK, JJ., would grant.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59731-59732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24258]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Member Conflict Review, Program Announcement (PA) 
07-318, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

Time and Date: 1 p.m.-3 p.m., November 15, 2010 (Closed).
    Place: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 
(NIOSH), CDC, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, 
telephone: (304)285-6143.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with 
provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., 
and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.

[[Page 59732]]

    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of ``Member Conflict Review, PA 07-
318.''

Contact Person for More Information: M. Chris Langub, PhD., Scientific 
Review Administrator, Office of Extramural Programs, National Institute 
for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., 
Mailstop E74, Atlanta Georgia 30333; Telephone: (404)498-2543.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: September 20, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-24258 Filed 9-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Peter J. Maloney, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Keynote Systems, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2003 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:    December 29, 2003



|/S/    PETER J.
MALONEY                   
|------------------------------------------
|Peter J. Maloney                          
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)             



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Keynote Systems, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Newsom *v.*The Pennsylvania Railroad Company et al.

[No. 19,356.

Filed April 3, 1962.]

*583*Berry, Kincade & Allen,*of Terre Haute, for appellant Newsom.

*Bernard C. Craig,*of Brazil, for cross-appellant Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Company.

*George C. Forrey 111, White, Raub & Forrey,*of Indianapolis, and *Kenneth C. Miller,*of Brazil, for appellees.

Ax, J.

Appellant, plaintiff below, filed her complaint against appellees. for alleged personal injuries, which she claimed to have suffered when she was caused to fall on the floor of the Union Station in the City of Terre Haute by reason of the alleged negligence of the appellees in the maintenance of said floor. The cause was submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of appellant, assessing damages in the amount of .$15,000.00, and on which consistent j udgment was entered.

Separate motions for new trial were filed by. each of said, appellees and both motions were sustained by the court which entered the following order:

> “The court having herétofore examined the separate motions of defendants for new trial of this action and having heard oral argument thereon and having had said matter under advisement for ruling, now the court being advised sustains the separate motions of defendants for new trial of this action.”

From the granting of the motions for new trial, appellant has appealed, assigning as her only error *584that the trial court erred in sustaining the separate motions of appellees for a new trial.

The separate motions for new trial contained many specifications of error. Without a statement of the claimed error which the court below recognized as the reason for the granting of the motions for new trial, both the appellant and this court are faced with the arduous task of not only considering each and every specification of error claimed by the appellees in their separate motions for new trial, but any other possible error which may have occurred during the proceedings and which was not specified in the motions. As stated recently by this Court in the case of *Rife*v. *Karns*(1962), 133 Ind. App. 226, 181 N. E. 2d 239, “good practice requires the trial court to state the reasons for its decision in writing when a motion for new trial is sustained,” and “we deem it advisable to impose such a requirement at this time to establish good practice and to further the orderly administration of justice.”

Notwithstanding the fact that in the *Rife*case, *supro,*one of the specifications in the assignment of error was that the court erred in overruling the appellant’s motion to state the specific reasons for setting aside the verdict of the jury, and in the case before us no such motion was made by the appellant before the court below, we nevertheless are of the opinion that good practice would dictate that the trial judge should so state his specific reasons for so doing.

The cause is therefore remanded with instructions to the trial judge to state in writing the reasons for the sustaining of the separate motions for new trial.

Ryan, C. J., Myers and Cooper JJ., concur.

Note. — Reported in 181 N. E. 2d 240.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Waypoint Financial Corp.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-52130, No. 333-75352, and 333-75354) on Form S-8 of Waypoint Financial Corp.
of our report dated January 21, 2003, with respect to the consolidated statement
of financial condition of Waypoint Financial Corp. as of December 31, 2002 and
the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December
31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of Waypoint Financial Corp. Our report
refers to a change in accounting for goodwill.

                                  /s/ KPMG LLP


Lancaster, Pennsylvania
March 27, 2003

                                       88
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LANCE PATRICK GREENAWALT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 269 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Order entered April 22, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00010-CR

No. 05-21-00014-CR

NICHOLAS DAVID CHAMBERS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 296-80112-2018 & 296-80114-2018

ORDER

The reporter’s record, requested on January 11 and due on January 30, 2021, 

has not been filed. We notified court reporter Janet Dugger on February 3, 2021, 

directing her to file the reporter’s record by March 5, 2021. When she did not do 

so, we then ordered Ms. Dugger to file the reporter’s record by April 5, 2021. To 

date, she has not filed the reporter’s record or responded to the Court’s 

communications.
We ORDER Janet Dugger to file the reporter’s record by May 3, 2021. We 

caution Ms. Dugger that the failure to do so will result in the Court taking 

whatever actions it deems appropriate to ensure these appeals proceed in a more 

timely fashion, which may include ordering Ms. Dugger not sit until the reporter’s 

record in these appeals is filed.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable John 

Roach, Jr. Presiding Judge, 296th Judicial District Court; to court reporter Janet 

Dugger, 296th Judicial District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
News United States Air Force
 SecAF implements additional security measures after attacksPublished Dec. 3, 2015
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Command Information
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                In response to the defense secretary’s call to improve the security and force protection of defense personnel after the tragic events in Chattanooga, Tennessee, Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James introduced more stringent security measures to reduce the possibility of violent acts directed toward Airmen on and off installations."In the wake of the tragedies at Fort Hood, the Navy Yard and Chattanooga, we worked closely with DOD, the Joint Staff and other services to identify and provide effective and long-lasting force protection enhancements,” James said. “We take the safety of our service members, civilians and their families who support them seriously and continue to examine ways to make our installations and facilities safer.”Defense Secretary Ash Carter initially charged the secretaries of the military departments with improving physical and procedural security, mass warning and alert notification capabilities and augmenting security. “As part of this commitment, we increased the number of armed security forces on base through several arming programs, are enhancing force protection measures at off-installation facilities, and are working on long-term mass notification systems,” James said. “Commanders remain fully empowered and are expected to make arming decisions for off-installation facilities consistent with existing authorities. They are also best positioned to balance the mission with the threat and determine the appropriate level of security required for a given facility.”In addition, off-installation facilities will establish and maintain emergency action plans and practice these plans through training exercises at least twice a year.“We are working with (the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence) toward an armed contract solution for off-installation facilities like our recruiting stations, and we are strengthening relationships with local law enforcement agencies and partnering on exercises to ensure all personnel are prepared to respond to future incidents,” James said. “These efforts are designed to increase the safety of our service members, their families and the communities we live in and support."security 



safety 



DOD 



SecAF
News United States Air Force
 Remains of missing Airman in Guam confirmedPublished Dec. 8, 2014
                        
                        By Air Force News Service
                **BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, La. (AFNS) --**
                Leadership from the 2nd Bomb Wing confirmed the loss of Airman Alec Dye during a press briefing here Dec. 6.
Dye, a crew chief from the 2nd Aircraft Maintenance Squadron at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, was deployed to Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, where he was last seen at Tarague Beach on Dec 1. On Dec. 3, remains were recovered on the beach where he went missing, and were confirmed to be Dye’s on Dec. 4.
"The news is beyond sad and our team is mourning the loss of one of our own," said Col. Kristin Goodwin, the 2nd Bomb Wing commander. "As great as our pain is, though, it pales in comparison to the loss that is felt by the Dye family and all of those who loved and knew Alec, and we want to ensure that they know that we are here to help them and support them in any capacity."
Throughout the search for Dye, his unit's squadron commander and Air Force officials remained in contact with his family. On Barksdale AFB, chaplains and base mental health professionals provided support to those impacted by his loss.
While relatively new to the wing, Dye was well-regarded within the 2nd AMXS.
"Alec was an outstanding young Airman, and a B-52H Stratofortress crew chief," said Lt. Col. Michael Hammack, the 2nd AMXS commander. "He was progressing well in his upgrade training and was well on his way to becoming an outstanding aircraft maintainer. Alec was known for his eagerness to learn, his willingness to take on the toughest tasks, and his enthusiasm for his job as a B-52 mechanic. His bright personality and service to his country will have a lasting impact on us all."
Throughout the near week-long search for Dye, a variety of Guam-based agencies were engaged in the recovery efforts, to include: the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, U.S. Coast Guard, Guam Police Department and Guam Fire Rescue. This level of support was not lost on 2nd Bomb Wing leadership.
"We want to express our gratitude to the more than 180 Guam individuals, both federal and local agencies, who were involved in the search and recovery efforts for Alec," Goodwin said. "Their determination validates what we all know - that the life of every Airman is a precious thing."*(Information provided by Senior Airman Benjamin Raughton, 2nd Bomb Wing Public Affairs)*Andersen AFB 



Barksdale AFB 



missing Airman 



Alec Dye 



Guam Related Links
        Search continues for missing Airman in Guam
                                Dec. 3, 2014
                                An Airman who has been missing since Dec. 1 has been identified as Airman Alec M. Dye.Dye was deployed to Andersen Air Force Base from the 2nd Aircraft Maintenance Squadron at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, and was last seen near Tarague Beach, Guam.