alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Consolidated  Statement  of  Financial  Condition  at December  31, 1998 and the
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001033643
<NAME>                       OCWEN ASSET INVESTMENT CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000
<CURRENCY>                                            USD
       
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                              3,485
<SECURITIES>                                      351,154
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    888,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              21,190
<BONDS>                                           622,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              190
<OTHER-SE>                                        220,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      888,326
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   90,553
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     107,867
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   13,317
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      642
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 27,528
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (58,801)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (58,801)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       615
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (58,186)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (3.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (3.07)
        

</TABLE>
#### Tommie Mack GRANGER v. Stephanie W. GRANGER.

No. 2011-CJ-1882.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Granger, Tommie Mack; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 198,383; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 11-77.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jarrel ARLINE.

No. 2011-KK-0402.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 28, 2011.

In re: Arline, Jarrel; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. M, Nos. 10-2796, 10-2798; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. ll-K-193.

Denied.
#### Annette R. NESBITT v. B. Woodrow NESBITT, Jr.

No. 2011-C-2301.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re Nesbitt Jr., B. Woodrow; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 465,001; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,514-CA.

Denied.
(logo)
  GREAT
FINANCIAL
  BANK         Suite 1900
(logo)         329 West Main Street
               Louisvilie, KY 40202-4240


February 7, 1997


Re: Management's Assertion Report on Compliance with Minimum Servicing Standards

To the Stockholder:

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1996,  Great  Financial  Bank, FSB has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  UNIFORM  SINGLE  ATTESTATION
PROGRAM FOR  MORTGAGE  BANKERS.  As of and for this same year,  Great  Financial
Bank,  FSB had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions  policy in the
amount of $9,000,000.




/s/ Paul M. Baker
Paul M. Baker
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Richard M. Klapheke
Richard M. Klapheke
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer

/s/ Arthur L. Harreld
Arthur L. Harreld
Executive Vice President

/s/ William L. Boue'
William L. Boue'
Senior Vice President - Loan Administration
News United States Air Force
 July issue of Airman magazine now availablePublished July 5, 2016
                        
                        By Airman Magazine Staff
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)  --**
                The July issue of Airman magazine is now available to download and is viewable through a web browser. 
In the cover story, titled “Arctic Vigil,” you’ll go behind the scenes with the 176th Air Defense Squadron and the Combat Alert Cell of F-22 Raptors that monitor the sovereign airspace around Alaska and intercept any potential intruders. 
In the next feature, you will read about the private citizens who have rescued and restored President Dwight D. Eisenhower's plane, which was the first to bear the call sign 'Air Force One.' 
Finally, you will spend time with a military couple that offers love, stability and a family to foster children.
You can download July’s issue of Airman magazine on your tablet here:
- Apple version 
- Android version 
To read this issue on a PC/Mac, click here.
For more stories, visit Airman Online, the website for the official magazine of the U.S. Air Force.Airman magazine 



F-22 



Combat Alert Cell 



Air Force One 



AF family
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Certification      of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  /S/                Robert J. Colletti________________________________________                Robert                J. Colletti |
|   | Senior                Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting                Officer                            |
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

EXHIBIT 10(a)  


  
 

  [SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP LETTERHEAD]  
  


December 31, 2003 


Board
of Directors

Protective Life Insurance Company

2801 Highway 280 South 

Birmingham, Alabama 35223 


Directors:



        We
hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters" in the statement of additional information filed as part of post-effective amendment number 6 to the
registration statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-94047) filed by Protective Life Insurance Company and Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In
giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933. 



	 	 	Sincerely,
	

 	
 	
SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	
/S/ DAVID S. GOLDSTEIN

	 	 	 	 	David S. Goldstein











QuickLinks


[SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP LETTERHEAD]
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Austin L. Roberts, III, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bay Banks of Virginia, Inc; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:March 26, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheets and statements of operations found on pages F-2 and F-3 of the Company's
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1997, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              $ 7,359,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,324,682
<PP&E>                                         264,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,693
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,997,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,769,411
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,886,584
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,997,329
<SALES>                                     15,637,853
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,637,853
<CGS>                                       11,323,829
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,323,829
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,330,255
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             159,292
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,824,477
<INCOME-TAX>                                   727,045
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,097,432
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,097,432
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08

</TABLE>
NO. 03-15-00125-CR

JAMES MONTOYA * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS Appellant *
VS. * OF THE THIRD * SUPREME JUDICIAL * DISTRICT OF TEXAS
THE STATE OF TEXAS * Appellee * AT AUSTIN TEXAS

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

APPELLATE BRIEF
TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS: COMES NOW, Appellant, and files this Motion for an Extension in which to file the Appellant’s Brief. In support of this motion, appellant shows the Court the following:
I

. The Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Hays County, Texas of the offense of aggravated kidnaping. Appellant was sentenced to life in TDCJ.
II. The deadline for filing the Appellant’s Brief is August 26, 2015 and Appellant has requested no previous extensions.
III. Attorney for the Appellant would further show the Court that he has been ACCEPTED 03-15-00125-CR 6854146 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/9/2015 4:30:49 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKd i l i g en t i n p rep ari n g A p pel l ee’ s b ri ef in t h i s cas e. Du e t o a v ery b us y d o ck et co u n s el

i s u n ab le t o co m

p let e t h e b ri ef w i t h i n t h e ti m e fram e. Co un s el req ues t s an ex t en s i o n

o f ti m e s o t hat h e m ay ad eq u at el y p rep are Ap p el l an t ’ s Bri ef. Co u n s el m u s t co m p l et e h i s i n v es t i g at i on o f t h e reco rd an d d raft t he b ri ef.
W HEREFORE, Ap p el l an t p ray s t h e Co u rt g ran t t h i s M o t io n an d e x t en d t h e d ead li n e fo r fi l i ng t h e Ap p el lan t ’ s Bri ef t o Oct o b er 1 2 , 2 0 1 5.

Res p ect fu l ly

Su b m i t t ed , ARIEL PAYAN At t o rn ey at Law 1 0 12 Ri o Gran d e Au s ti n, Tex as 7 8 7 0 1 (5 1 2 ) 4 78 -3 9 0 0 (5 1 2 ) 4 72 -4 1 0 2 (fax ) Ari el pay an @ h o t m ai l.co m / s / Ari el Pay an ARIEL PAYAN St at e Bar No

. 0 0 7 9 4 4 3 0

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

By m y si g n at u re ab o v e, I h ereb y cert i fy t h at a tru e an d co rrect co p y o f t h e ab o ve an d fo reg oi n g M o t i o n fo r Ex ten s i o n o f Ti m e t o Fi l e Ap p el l at e Bri ef h as b een d el i v ered t o t h e Cri m i n al Di st ri ct At t o rn ey o f sai d Co u n t y Tex a s , o n Sep t em b er 8, 2 0 1 5

.
2013 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

5-15-2013 

# F r ed C l a y wor th v . C oun t y of L

uze r ne

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al

D ock e t N o . 11-4593

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2013

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2013 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du

. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" F r e d C l a y w or th v . C oun t y of L uz e r ne " (2013). 2013 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 842. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2013/842

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 11

- 4593

___________ FRED CLAYWORTH, individually and as parent

and natural guardian of G.H.,

Appellant

v.

LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA; LUZERNE COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES; FRANK CASTANO; JOSEPH KLOSS; JOHN KOSLOSKI; TARA MCCUTCHEON; WILMA SNOPEK;

JOANNE VAN SAUN

Before: FUENTES, HARDIMAN and ROTH, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

The petition for rehearing f ile d by Appellant having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion and judgment filed Febr uary 5, 2013 is hereby VACATED, and a new opinion and judgment will issue forthwith

.

By the Court,

/s/ JANE R. ROTH Circuit Judge

Dated: May 15, 2013

T nh/ cc: All Counsel of Record
# United States Navy

**– Marine Corps**  **Court of Criminal Appeals**

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Daniel K. MIZUTA Lance Corporal (E

- 3) , U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 201 800 269 Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary D ecided: 5 March 2019

. Military Judge: Commander William Weiland , JAGC, USN

. Sentence a djudged 22 May 2018 by a general court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia , cons isting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence app roved by c onvening authority :
r eduction to E

- 1 , forfeiture of all pay and allowances, co nfinement for 18 months , and a bad

- conduct discharge

. For Appellant: Major James S. Kresge, USMCR

. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller , Esq.

_________________________ This opinion do es not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________ Before WOODARD, FULTON , and ELLINGTON , Appellate Military Judges.United States v. Mizuta , No. 201 8 00 269

2 PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assig nment of error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. 1 T he findings and s entence as approved by the convening authority are AFFIRMED

.
FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court

1 We note that the record of trial was authenticated by the court reporter. R ULE F OR C OU RT

- M ARTIAL 1104(A)(2)(B), M ANUAL F OR C OURTS

- M ARTIAL , U NITED S TATES (2016 ed.), permits a court reporter in a judge

- alone trial to authenticate a record of trial, but only if “the military judge cannot authen ticate the record of trial because of the milita ry judge’s death, disability, or absence” and “the trial counsel [present at the end of the trial] cannot au thenticate the record of trial because of the trial counsel’s death, disability, or absence . . . .” The authentication page fails to indicate that the military judge and trial counsel were not available to authenticate the record of trial. However, in a hand

- written note on a checklist at tached to another part of the record , there is a reference that the military judge and trial counsel were u n available to authenticate the record

. R ecognizing that in the future

— for cases referred to trial on or after 1 January 2019

— new procedures will apply, in the meantime a court reporter r emains un authorized to aut henticate the record unless certain conditions exist . Those preconditions should be clearly set out as part of any substitute authentication done by a court reporter or a trial counsel

.
#### STATE of Louisiana in the Interest of I.P.

No. 2011-CK-0066.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2011.

In re State of Louisiana; —Other; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Orleans Parish Juvenile Court, Nos. 2010-048-02-DC-C, 2009-313-02-DQ B; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-0882.

Denied.
#### Sarah TROSCLAIR, et al. v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIPBUILDING, INC., et al.

No. 2011-CC-0278.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 16, 2011.

In re Trosclair, Joseph Anthony; Tros-clair, Sarah Calegon et al.; —Plaintiff(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. C, No. 2010-6217; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-C-1727.

Denied.
#### W. A. Priutt v. L. Kelley.

(No. 3490.)

Appeal from Navarro County.

Frost & Etheridge, counsel for appellant.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

Will-son, J.

§ 175. *Cost on appeal from, justice's court, how adjudged.*Appellant instituted this suit in justice’s court to recover $200 rent of appellee, and sued out a distress warrant. Appellee pleaded in reconvention for damages. In justice’s court appellant recovered judgment for $82.29 rent, and appellee recovered judgment on his plea in re-convention for $100. On a trial *de novo*in the county court, on appeal, appellee recovered judgment that appellant take nothing, etc., and the costs of both courts were adjudged against appellant; no reason for so adjudging the costs being shown in the record.

By his appeal, appellant relieved himself of the judgment rendered against him in the justice’s court, aud was therefore entitled to recover the costs incurred in the county court. [R. S., art. 1432; 3 App. C. C., §235.]

§ 176. *Landlord and tenant; landlord is entitled to recover rent although distress warrant may be illegal.*In effect, the court charged the jury that, if the distress warrant was illegally sued out — that is, if the ground stated in the affidavit for the distress warrant was untrue— they would find for the defendant. This charge was erroneous. Plaintiff’s right to recover did not depend upon the legality of the distress warrant. If a rental contract existed, as alleged by plaintiff, he was entitled to recover upon it regardless of the existence of the ground alleged in the affidavit for the distress warrant. [Dwyer v. Testard, 65 Tex. 432; Wallace v. *259Bogel, 66 Tex. 574; Cloud v. Smith, 1 Tex. 611; 3 App. C. C., § 421.] The special charges requested by appellant should have been given.

December 6, 1890.

Keversed and remanded.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BARRY SCALES.

March 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.