alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      13,328,000
<SECURITIES>                                37,896,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,627,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   239,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            80,700,000
<PP&E>                                      19,977,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,583,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              90,394,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,301,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,502,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  72,459,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                90,394,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           114,719,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               80,763,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,474,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             21,247,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,131,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         13,116,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                13,116,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .82
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT13**

**SARBANES-OXLEYACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS**

In connection with thisannual report on Form 20-F of Tevecap S.A. for the period ended December 31,2006, Leila Abraham Loria, Chief Executive Officer of Tevecap S.A. and CarlosEduardo Malagoni, Chief Financial Officer of Tevecap S.A., each hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.             thisForm 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.             theinformation contained in this Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2006fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Tevecap S.A.
| Date: July 11, 2007 | /s/ Leila Abraham Loria |   |
|---------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                | Leila Abraham Loria     |
|                | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 
| Date: July 11, 2007 | /s/ Carlos Eduardo Malagoni |   |
|---------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                | Carlos Eduardo Malagoni     |
|                | Chief Financial Officer     |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tevecap S.A. andwill be retained by Tevecap S.A. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
#### STATE ex rel. Andre LEDAY v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1785.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2011.

In re LeDay, Andre Wesley; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of West Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 04-WFLN-000477; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 0442.

Denied. Moot.
#### Joseph M. BOULE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D11-901.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

July 1, 2011.

Joseph M. Boule, Jr., Avon Park, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Roller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Joseph M. Boule, Jr., appeals from the dismissal of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 in lower case number 2007-CF-952. Boule originally entered a plea to the charges in this case in exchange for a sentence of 11 months and 29 days in the county jail followed by 3 years of drug offender probation. When Boule violated his probation, the court imposed a sentence of 15 years in prison on the most serious of the charges. Thereafter, Boule timely filed a 3.850 motion challenging his original plea and sentence, which the trial court summarily denied. Boule appealed the denial order and, while this appeal was pending, filed a second 3.850 motion challenging his counsel’s representation during the violation of probation hearing. The trial court dismissed this second motion believing that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain it in light of the pending appeal of Boule’s first 3.850 motion. Boule filed this appeal challenging dismissal of his second 3.850 motion.

As the State acknowledges on appeal, a trial court has concurrent jurisdiction during the pendency of an appeal from an order denying postconviction relief to consider a subsequent postconviction motion that raises issues unrelated to those presented in the prior motion. *See, e.g., Smith v. State,*34 So.3d 818 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). Accordingly, we reverse the order on appeal and remand with directions that the trial court consider Boule’s motion for postconviction relief.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

ORFINGER, C.J., LAWSON, and COHEN, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       8,641,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0     
<RECEIVABLES>                                  511,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    653,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,114,000
<PP&E>                                      71,098,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,920,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              71,894,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       93,609,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                       100,000        
<OTHER-SE>                                (32,733,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                71,894,000
<SALES>                                      4,933,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,806,000 
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,120,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               154,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,015,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,470,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,470,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,470,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Land O'Lakes, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Christopher J.
Policinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  March 20, 2006
                                           By: /s/ Christopher J. Policinski
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Christopher J. Policinski
                                               President
                                               and Chief Executive Officer



                                       3
#### Terrance L. JACKSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-3951.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 31, 2011.

Terrance L. Jackson, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

BENTON, C.J., LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
#### The Texas Central R. R. Co. v. L. G. Morris.

(No. 2768, Op. Book No. 4.)

Appeal from Shackleford County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 374. *Special stipulation by railroad company in contract for shipment of cattle with regard to loss or injury.*A stipulation was embodied in the contract for the shipment of the cattle, by which it was made a condition precedent to the right of the shipper to recover for any damages for loss or injury to the stock whilst in transit, that he should first give notice in writing of his claim for such damages to some officer of the railroad, or near*159est station agent, before the stock were moved from the place of destination or place of delivery, and before said stock were mingled with other stock. Held, that such stipulation was valid, legal and binding upon the shipper. [Mo. Pac. R. R. Co. v. Harris (Commissioners of Appeals), *post,*p. 000.]

June 2, 1883.

Eeversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from balance
sheets and statements of operations and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                             354                   4,717
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,209                  13,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                       670                     140
<INVENTORY>                                     76,674                   6,902
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               181,335                  30,376
<PP&E>                                         163,865                  15,086
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,698                   1,011
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,433,882                 372,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          214,764                  28,227
<BONDS>                                        402,242                 202,419
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          647,327                  63,697
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           670                     291
<OTHER-SE>                                    (44,142)                   1,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,433,882                 372,739
<SALES>                                        789,193                 143,020
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               789,193                 143,020
<CGS>                                          317,547                  45,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  622,400                 104,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               122,902                  18,431
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   670                     140
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              65,081                  18,393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,860)                   2,014
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,306                     779
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (36,166)                   1,235
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  9,211                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,377)                   1,235
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.85)                    0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.85)                    0.04
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERI, JEFFREY I. DREBEN, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of CVF Technologies Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Annual Report.3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultof operation and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisAnnual Report.4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and we have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisAnnual Report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report basedon such evaluation.     c) disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function);     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated: April 13, 2007      CVF TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 58467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24183]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Sunshine Act Meetings; Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of 
Directors

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

TIME AND DATE: October 14, 2010, 12 noon to 3 p.m., Eastern Daylight 
Time.

PLACE: This meeting will take place telephonically. Any interested 
person may call 877.768.0032 passcode 4856462 to participate in this 
meeting by telephone.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board 
of Directors (the Board) will continue its work in developing and 
implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement and to 
that end, may consider matters properly before the Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified 
Carrier Registration Board of Directors at (505) 827-4565.

    Issued on: September 21, 2010.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010-24183 Filed 9-22-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
#### RELENTLESS AIR RACING, LLC, and Kevin Eldredge, Appellants, v. ROBINSON AIR CRANE, INC., Appellee.

No. 3D10-2164.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 22, 2010.

Steven P. Befera, for appellants.

Ted H. Bartelstone, Miami, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN and SUAREZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Machtinger v. Inertial Airline Servs., Inc.,*937 So.2d 730, 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                         Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of First Virtual  Communications,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2004, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Gregory  Sterling,  Chief  Restructuring  Officer of the Company,
certify,  to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to Exchange Act Rule  15d-14(b)
and 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     i.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     ii.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section 906, has been  provided to First Virtual
Communications,  Inc. and will be retained by First Virtual Communications, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.


Date: November 28, 2005                  FIRST VIRTUAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

                                         By: /s/ Gregory Sterling
                                             ----------------------------
                                             Gregory Sterling
                                             Chief Restructuring Officer
                                             (Duly Authorized Officer and
                                             Principal Financial Officer)
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Brandon Lamar CULVER, Appellee.

No. 5D10-3387.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 17, 2011.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Roller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

F. Wesley Blankner, Jr., of Jaeger & Blankner, Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals the trial court’s decision to withhold adjudication of guilt following Brandon Culver’s no contest plea to a charge of fleeing and eluding a law enforcement officer in violation of section 316.1935(1), Florida Statutes (2009).

Section' 316.1935(6) expressly prohibits the court from "withholding adjudication of guilt for any violation of section 316.1935. *See State v. Warner,*50 So.3d 99 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); *State v. Scriber,*991 So.2d 969 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (holding trial court not permitted by statute to withhold adjudication of guilt in light of fleeing and eluding statutes express prohibition). For this reason, we reverse that portion of the sentencing order withholding adjudication and remand this matter to the circuit court for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-59307 and 333-35060) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option Plan
of Notify Technology Corporation of our report dated October 25, 2000 (except
for Note 8, as to which the date is December 14, 2000), with respect to the
financial statements of Notify Technology Corporation included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB/A) for the year ended September 30, 2000.

                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
May 4, 2001
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 19

- 00068

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the County Court

Young County, Texas

Trial Court No. 37559

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### J OEL 

### T HOMAS 

### B OWEN



### , Appellant

V



### .

T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant has moved to dismiss his appeal. Because we have not yet decided

this case, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a),

43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: October 3, 2019
Order entered April 9 , 202 1

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 20

- 0081 1

- CR No. 05

- 20

- 00812

- CR

JORGE GARCIA OLGUIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On A ppe al from the 416t h Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416

- 82189

- 2020 C ts. 1 & 2

O RDER

Before the Court are appellant ’s April 5, 2021 motions for extension s of

time to file his brief

s in these appeals. W e GRANT the mot ions a nd ORDER

ap p e llant ’ s brief s received with the motions filed as of the date of this or der.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE