alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To the Board of Directors 

Bay Banks OfVirginia, Inc. 

Kilmarnock, Virginia 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-112947) and in the related Prospectus, of our report, datedJanuary 21, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Bay Banks of Virginia, Inc. and subsidiaries, included in the 2004 Annual Report of Shareholders and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C. 

 

 

Winchester,Virginia 

March 16, 2005 

 

56
#### LUV N’ CARE, LTD. v. JACKEL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED.

No. 2011-CC-1994.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Luv N’ Care Ltd.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 10-1891; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46822-CW.

Denied.
#### Anthony N. JOHNSON and Bernadette Johnson v. 1425 DAUPHINE, L.L.C.

No. 2011-C-0001.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Johnson, Anthony N. et al.; Johnson, Bernadette; —Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/pr Review, Parish of Orleans, ADR Inc., No. 08-683; Civil District Court Div. D, No. 2008-10691; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-0793.

Denied.
#### SMW & CHARBONNET CONSTRUCTION, L.L.P v. SATTERFIELD & PONTIKES CONSTRUCTION GROUP, L.L.C., et al.

No. 2012-CC-0456.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 2012.

In re SMW & Charbonnet Construction L.L.P.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervi*1251sory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. H, No. 2011-05518; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-C-1774.

Denied.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# AF Week in Photos

              - Published  July 22, 2016
              -                             By Defense Media Activity                                                    

**FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --  **This week's photos feature Airmen from around the globe involved in activities supporting expeditionary operations and defending America. This weekly feature showcases the men and women of the Air Force.

Week in PhotosWIPAF WIPTop Photos
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy Dalene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: March  29, 2007      /s/ Roy Dalene Roy Dalene Chief Executive Officer
#### Palmer *v.*Palmer.

[No. 19,473.

Filed May 25, 1962.]

*416
      *William C. Erbecker,*of Indianapolis, for appellant.

*Hezzie B. Pike,*of Indianapolis, and *Carl Humble,*of Danville, for appellee.

Ax, J.

Appellant (plaintiff below) was granted a divorce upon her complaint to which appellee had filed a cross-complaint. The court adjusted property rights and entered a judgment for alimony for appellant. A motion for new trial filed by appellant alleging that the decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law was overruled and this is assigned as the only error.

No attorney appeared for appellant at the oral argument. Thus many questions that concerned the court not properly covered by appellant’s briefs remained unanswered.

We find from examination of appellant’s briefs that the only contention not waived by appellant is that the trial court abused its discretion in the amount of alimony awarded in the judgment.

The question of whether there has been an abuse of discretion must be apparent upon the face of the record. *Draime*v. *Draime*(1961), 132 Ind. App. 99, 173 N. E. 2d 70. In that case our court cited with approval the following:

> *417“An abuse of discretion is an erroneous conclusion and judgment, one clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances before the court, or the reasonable, probable and actual deductions to be drawn therefrom. The exercise of the lower court’s discretion is not reviewable; it is only the alleged abuse of that power which is reviewable on appeal.” McF*arlan*v. *Fowler Bank City Trust Co. et al.*(1938), 214 Ind. 10, 14, 12 N. E. 2d 752.

We have carefully and thoroughly examined the evidence produced at the trial and from such examination we can not say as a matter of law that the trial court abused its discretion on the amount of such alimony and judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Ryan, C. J., Cooper, J., and Myers, J., concur.

Note. — Reported in 182 N. E. 2d 593.
Department of the United States Air Force LogoBiography
                  United States Air ForceMaj Gen Frederick L. Anderson
            Major General FREDERICK LEWIS ANDERSON JR.Maj. Gen. Frederick Lewis Anderson Jr., was born at Kingston, N.Y., in 1905. He graduated from the U.S. Military Academy June 9, 1928, and was commissioned a second lieutenant of Cavalry.
That September General Anderson entered Primary Flying School at Brooks Field, Texas, graduated from Advanced Flying School at Kelly Field, Texas, a year later, and transferred to the Air Corps Nov. 1, 1929. Assigned to the 99th Observation Squadron at Mitchell Field, N.Y., he later joined the Fourth Composite Group at Nichols Field in the Philippines, serving in various capacities until October 1934.
Assigned with the 91st Observation Squadron at Crissy Field, Calif., in April 1935, he transferred to Hamilton Field, Calif., and that November he joined the Ninth Bomb Squadron there. In September 1936 he transferred to the Seventh Bomb Group there as Flight Commander and Operations Officer.
Two years later General Anderson assumed command of the 21st Air Base Squadron at Lowry Field, Denver, Colo. Entering the Air Corps Tactical School at Maxwell Field, Ala., in January 1940, he graduated the following April and remained at Lowry Field as commander of the Second School Squadron, becoming director of Bombardier Instruction at the Air Corps Tactical School there in July 1940.
The following May General Anderson was assigned as assistant to the chief of the Training Section, Training and Operations Division, Office of the Chief of Air Corps, Washington D. C., becoming deputy director of bombardment there in January 1942. A year later he was appointed commanding general of the Eighth Bomber Command in the European Theater of Operations.
His decorations include the Distinguished Service Medal, Legion of Merit and Distinguished Flying Cross. He is rated a senior pilot and combat observer.**EFFECTIVE DATES OF PROMOTION**
He was promoted to first lieutenant (permanent) May 16, 1934; to captain (temporary) May 25, 1935; to captain (permanent) June 9, 1938; to major (temporary) Jan. 31, 1941; to lieutenant colonel (temporary) Jan. 5, 1942; to colonel (temporary) March 1, 1942; to brigadier general (temporary) Feb. 7, 1943; to major general (temporary) Nov. 4, 1943.
(Up to date as of Sept. 30, 1947)Department of the Air Force Logo
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5631]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               COMMUNICATION FROM THE CLERK OF THE HOUSE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Riggs) laid before the House the 
following communication from the Clerk of the House of Representatives:

                                              Office of the Clerk,

                                     House of Representatives,

                                     Washington, DC, June 7, 1995.
     Hon. Newt Gingrich,
     The Speaker, House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Speaker: Pursuant to the permission granted in 
     Clause 5 of Rule III of the Rules of the U.S. House of 
     Representatives, I have the honor to transmit a sealed 
     envelope received from the White House on Tuesday, June 6, 
     1995 at 2:45 p.m. and said to contain a message from the 
     President whereby he transmits a report on the activities of 
     the United States Government relating to the prevention of 
     nuclear proliferation for calendar year 1994.
           With warm regards,
                                                   Robin H. Carle,
     Clerk.

                          ____________________
```
#### Lisa M. DETOURNAY, Brenda Randol, and The Riviera Neighborhood Association, Inc., a Florida Not-For-Profit Corporation, Petitioners, v. CITY OF CORAL GABLES, a Florida Municipal Corporation and Amace Properties, Inc., Respondents.

No. 3D11-886.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 29, 2011.

Andrew W.J. Dickman of Law Office of Andrew Dickman, P.A., Naples, for petitioners.

Gerald B. Cope, Jr., Elizabeth Hernandez and Jennifer Cohen Glasser of Aker-man Senterfitt, Miami, for respondent City of Coral Gables.

Santiago D. Echemendia and Maria P. Gonzalez of Tew Cardenas LLP, Miami, for respondent AMACE Properties, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

By this petition for writ of prohibition, petitioner seeks to disqualify the trial judge after a final hearing and the trial judge’s oral ruling in favor of the opposing parties. While the grounds alleged for disqualification occurred during the trial, the petitioners did not move to disqualify at that time. The trial court orally ruled and requested that the respondent furnish a proposed final judgment. Ten days later, petitioner moved to disqualify the trial judge. Based upon *Fischer v. Knuck,*497 So.2d 240 (Fla.1986), the motion to disqualify was untimely when delayed until after the final judgment. *See also Lawson v. Longo,*547 So.2d 1279 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Even if it were timely, the grounds raised were legally insufficient. *See*Fla.Code Jud. Conduct Canon 3(B)(7)(d) (“A judge may, with the consent of the parties, confer separately with the parties and their lawyers in an effort to mediate or settle matters pending before the judge.”); *Polanco v. State,*993 So.2d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (legally sufficient motion for disqualification must have some first-hand knowledge upon which to swear to truth of allegations).

WARNER, LEVINE and CONNER, Associate Judges, concur.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

July Term 2014

PGA MEXX, LLC d/b/a CABO FLATS,

Petitioner,

v.

TRENT MAYER,

Respondent.

No. 4D14-401

[July 9, 2014]

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Edward H. Fine, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. 13-12809 AE.

Richard F. Della Fera and Joshua M. Entin of Entin & Della Fera, 

P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Stephan A. LeClainche of Babbitt Johnson Osborne & LeClainche, 

P.A., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

PGA MEXX, LLC d/b/a Cabo Flats petitions for a writ of certiorari 

seeking review of an order denying its emergency motion for stay. Based 

upon an order of a Delaware chancery court enjoining actions involving 

petitioner’s insurer until October 7, 2014, we grant the petition and 

direct the trial court to stay all proceedings in this case. See Am.

Bonding Co. v. Coastal Metal Sales, Inc., 679 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 2d DCA 

1996). 

Petition Granted with Directions.

MAY, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
583 A.2d 337

#### JOSEPH SPEISER v. HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE CO.

March 7, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 237 *N.J.Super.*507, 568 A.2d 543)
#### STATE ex rel. Dallas C. TAYLOR v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-2545.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Taylor, Dallas C.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 06-F-2683; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46028-KH.

Denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GEORGE GERSTOFER.

March 27, 1984.

Petition for certification denied. (See 191 *N.J.Super.*542)
Exhibit 12.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In
connection with the Annual Report of United Microelectronics Corporation (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John Hsuan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:  June 25, 2003



By: /s/ John HsuanName: John HsuanTitle: Chief Executive Officer




|* |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1028 

To create a Rural Policing Institute as part of the Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2007 

Mr. SALAZAR (for himself and Mr. UDALL of Colorado) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To create a Rural Policing Institute as part of the Federal 

Law Enforcement Training Center. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RURAL POLICING INSTITUTE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—There is established a Rural Po5 licing Institute, which shall be administered by the Office 

6 of State and Local Training of the Federal Law Enforce7 ment Training Center of the Department of Homeland Se8 curity, to— 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 1028 IH

1 (1) evaluate the needs of law enforcement agen2 cies of units of local government and tribal govern3 ments located in rural areas; 

4 (2) develop expert training programs designed 

5 to address the needs of rural law enforcement agen6 cies regarding combating methamphetamine addic7 tion and distribution, domestic violence, law enforce8 ment response related to school shootings, and other 

9 topics identified in the evaluation conducted under 

10 paragraph (1); 

11 (3) provide the training programs described in 

12 paragraph (2) to law enforcement agencies of units 

13 of local government and tribal governments located 

14 in rural areas; and 

15 (4) conduct outreach efforts to ensure that 

16 training programs under the Rural Policing Institute 

17 reach law enforcement officers of units of local gov18 ernment and tribal governments located in rural 

19 areas. 

20 (b) CURRICULA.—The training at the Rural Policing 

21 Institute established under subsection (a) shall be config22 ured in a manner so as to not duplicate or displace any 

23 law enforcement program of the Federal Law Enforce24 ment Training Center in existence on the date of enact25 ment of this Act. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•HR 1028 IH

1 (c) RURAL DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

2 ‘‘rural’’ means area that is not located in a metropolitan 

3 statistical area, as defined by the Office of Management 

4 and Budget. 

5 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

6 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

7 (including for contracts, staff, and equipment)— 

8 (1) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; and 

9 (2) $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009 

10 through 2013. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Matthew MILEY.

No. 2010-KK-2464.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 17, 2010.

In re Miley, Matthew; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 24251; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 1553.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Ambrose J. HEBERT II v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1541.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Hebert II, Ambrose J.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. John, 40th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 04-417; to the *1134Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-KH-313.

Denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winston Hotels, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  Report), I, Joseph V. Green,
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|             |  |                                                                                
|------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|             |  | /s/ Joseph V. Green                                                            
|             |  |                                                                                
|Name:
Title: |  | Joseph V. Green
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|             |  |                                                                                
|Date:        |  | May 8, 2003                                                                    



|* |  | Furnished in accordance with the Commissions guidance published in SEC Rel.
No. 34-47551. This exhibit shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any document or filed herewith for purposes of liability under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

29
##### 



Exhibit 12.1 FIRST INDUSTRIAL, L.P.
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Year Ended December 31,Restated2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Income from Continuing Operations
    
    $
    44,051
    
    
    $
    36,340
    
    
    $
    65,186Plus: Interest Expense and Amortization of
Deferred Financing Costs
    
    
    100,995
    
    
    
    96,959
    
    
    
    89,297Earnings Before Fixed Charges
    
    $
    145,046
    
    
    $
    133,299
    
    
    $
    154,483Fixed Charges
    
    $
    102,299
    
    
    $
    97,720
    
    
    $
    97,089Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (a)
    
    
    1.42x
    
    
    
    1.36x
    
    
    
    1.59x
  (a)
    For purposes of computing the ratios of earnings to fixed charges, earnings have been calculated
by adding fixed charges (excluding capitalized interest) to income from continuing operations. Fixed
charges consist of interest costs, whether expensed or capitalized and amortization of deferred
financing costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000919602
<NAME> HELSINKI CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          591
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,837)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  45
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (45)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (45)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (45)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1




               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated January 31, 2001 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements of Noble International, Ltd. and subsidiaries appearing in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of the Company
on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-68001) and Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-53621) of the aforementioned report and the use of our name as it appears
under the caption "Experts."



GRANT THORNTON LLP



Detroit, Michigan
April 2, 2001