alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
031211-F-JZ509-358.JPG
            DR. ROBERT A CALICO JR.Dr. Robert A. Calico Jr. is Director of Academic Affairs, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. The school's mission is to provide master of science and doctor of philosophy degree programs for Air Force officers in the areas of engineering, science and management critical to maintaining the Air Force's technological superiority. Dr. Calico attended the University of Cincinnati where he earned bachelor of science, master of science and doctor of philosophy degrees in aerospace engineering. He authored more than 40 publications in the areas of flexible spacecraft dynamics and control, aircraft spin prediction and control of time periodic systems. Dr. Calico joined the faculty of the Graduate School of Engineering and Management in June 1972, where he has held the positions of assistant professor, associate professor and professor of aerospace engineering. He was appointed Dean of the Graduate School of Engineering and Management in July 1990. He assumed his current position in January 2006.EDUCATION1966 Bachelor of Science degree in aerospace engineering, honor graduate, University of Cincinnati, Ohio1968 Master of Science degree in aerospace engineering, University of Cincinnati, Ohio1971 Doctor of Philosophy degree in aerospace engineering, University of Cincinnati, OhioCAREER CHRONOLOGY1. June 1966 - August 1968, aerospace design engineer, Advanced Systems Branch, LTV Aerospace, Dallas, Texas2. September 1969 - June 1972, instructor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Ohio3. June 1972 - July 1990, assistant professor, associate professor and, later, professor of aerospace engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio4. July 1990 - January 2006, Dean, Graduate School of Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio5. January 2006 - present, Director of Academic Affairs, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, OhioAWARDS AND HONORSDistinguished Alumni,University of Cincinnati College of EngineeringDistinguished Engineer, Engineering and Science Foundation of DaytonPROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS AND ASSOCIATIONSAssociate Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and AstronauticsChairman, Dayton-Cincinnati Section of AIAASigma Xi Research SocietyTau Beta Pi Engineering Honor SocietySigma Gamma Tau Aerospace Engineering Honor SocietyAmerican Society of Engineering EducationBoard of Trustees of the Engineering and Science Foundation and the Engineering and Service Hall of Fame(Current as of March 2006)
#### Phillip WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D11-511.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 8, 2011.

Phillip Williams, Chipley, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

*389GRIFFIN, J.

In light of the State’s concession on the issue, we grant the petition for belated appeal. A copy of this opinion will be filed with the lower court and be treated as a notice of appeal in accordance with rule 9.141(c)(5)(D), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

PETITION GRANTED.

MONACO, C.J., and EVANDER, J., concur.
#### Antonio JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D10-699.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 2, 2011.

Antonio Johnson, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, WELLS, and SUAREZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Medina v. State,*919 So.2d 566, 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>                          <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                         YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUL-31-1998                JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            AUG-01-1997                AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              JUL-31-1998                JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          5,908                        325
<SECURITIES>                                        0                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   8,035                      3,264
<ALLOWANCES>                                      264                        154
<INVENTORY>                                     2,377                        220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17,083                      4,153
<PP&E>                                         10,750                      5,751
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,322                      1,313
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 30,577                      9,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           5,394                      3,416
<BONDS>                                             0                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                      8,936
<PREFERRED>                                         0                          0
<COMMON>                                            8                          2
<OTHER-SE>                                          0                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   30,577                      9,974
<SALES>                                        27,372                     14,211
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               27,372                     14,211
<CGS>                                          20,525                     11,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  20,525                     11,644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                7,743                      6,672
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,707                      1,665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2,369)                    (5,584)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (2,369)                    (5,584)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,369)                    (5,584)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                          0
<CHANGES>                                           0                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,369)                    (5,584)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.01)                     (3.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.01)                     (3.74)
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Marvin M. WALLACE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1554.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Wallace, Marvin M.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. N, No. 99-2636; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 08-WR-1080, 09-KH-607.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Alonzo MERCADEL.

No. 2011-KK-1934.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 7, 2011.

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 504-815; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1241.

Stay denied; writ denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being, Cornelis F. Wit, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Cornelis F. Wit                            
|Cornelis F. Wit                                
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|                                               
|April 6, 2011                                  

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
February 25, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF T.T.A. AKA T.T.A.; D.T.S.A., JR. AKA D.T.S.A.; 

D.M.D.A. AKA D.D.A., Children

NO. 14-13-00951-CV

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights signed 

October 2, 2013, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of 

the court below AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-10909

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Gerardo Silva, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:21-CR-58-2

______________________________

Before Wiener, Stewart, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Gerardo Silva has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Silva has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 21, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-10909 Document: 61-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/21/2024
No. 23-10909

2

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-10909 Document: 61-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/21/2024
#### E. M. Tillman v. John Hood et al.

(No. 2380.)

Appeal from Red River County.

Sims & 'Weight, counsel for appellant.

E. S. Chambees, counsel for appellees.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 191. *Certiorari; sufficient petition for; plea of privilege to be sued in county of residence; case stated.*A motion to dismiss appellant’s petition for *certiorari,*upon the ground that said “petition shows no sufficient cause for the writ, and fails to show want of jurisdiction in the court below, or a valid defense by petitioner, or that injustice has been done him,” was sustained. “In order to constitute sufficient cause ” in a petition for *certiorari,*“'the facts stated must show, either that the justice of the peace had not jurisdiction, or that injustice was done to the applicant by the final determination of the suit or proceeding, and that such injustice was not caused by his own inexcusable neglect.” [R. S. art. 303.] The main ground alleged in the petition in this case is, that the justice’s court had no jurisdiction of the person of the applicant, because said applicant resided in a dif*234ferent county and precinct than that in which the suit was instituted. He pleaded his privilege to be sued in the county of his residence in the justice’s court, which, plea was by said court overruled. Said plea was in duo form and sufficient, and was sustained by the evidence, as is shown in the petition for the *certiorari.*It is clearly shown in the petition for *certiorari*that the justice’s court had no jurisdiction of the person of appellant, and in all respects said petition was sufficient, and the court erred in dismissing it.

November 24, 1886.

Reversed 'and remanded.
Exhibit
10.21

     

    Feed Purchase
Contract

    


    Party A:
Weifang Taihong Feed Co., Ltd

    Party B:
Weifang Yuhe Poultry Co., Ltd

    


    This
contract is signed on a friendly negotiation and equality basis by and between
the aforementioned parties:

    


    
      	
              1,

            	
              Party
      B shall buy all necessary feed from Party A; Party A shall offer a
      preferential price for Party B.

            


    

    


    
      	
              2,

            	
              Party
      A shall provide feed in accordance with the nutrient demands of Party B’s
      flocks. Party B has the right to test the nutrient ingredients Party A’s
      provided feed.

            


    

    


    
      	
              3,

            	
              Term
      of this contract: During the term from January 1 st ,
      2006 to December 31st, 2008, Party B shall place purchase orders in
      accordance with its operating
demands.

            


    

    


    
      	
              4,

            	
              Place:
      Weifang Taihong Feed Co., Ltd

            


    

    


    
      	
              5,

            	
              Delivery
      of feed: Party A shall deliver the feed to appointed breeding farms of
      Party B.

            


    

    


    
      	
              6,

            	
              Payment:
      The feed shall be paid for in cash or through the banking
      system.

            


    

    


    
      	
              7,

            	
              Violations
      of this contract: In the event that Party A fails to provide feed in due
      time, which leads to Party B’s great loss, Party A should compensate for
      Party B’s losses by deducting the losses from payments of the feeds.
      Should Party B violates any provisions of this contract, party A can at
      any time stop the feed supply, or revoke this
  contract.

            


    

     

    
      	
              8,

            	
              This
      contract shall come into effectiveness after signature by both parties.
      This contract is made in two original copies, with one to be held by each
      party.

            


    

    


    Party A:
Weifang Taihong Feed Co., Ltd

    Representatives:
Wang Jianbo

    Party B;
Weifang Yuhe Poultry Co., Ltd

    Representatives:
Han Chengxiang

    


    Date:
January 1 st ,
2006
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 60169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24394]



[[Page 60169]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

September 23, 2010.
    The Department of Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirements to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the publication date of this notice. A copy of the submissions 
may be obtained by calling the Bureau Information Clearance Officer 
listed. Comments regarding these information collections should be 
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury PRA Clearance 
Officer, Department of the Treasury, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Suite 11010, Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before October 29, 
2010 to be assured of consideration.

Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund

    OMB Number: 1559-0031.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved information 
collection.
    Title: CDFI/CDE Fund Project Profile Web Form.
    Form: CDFI 0030.
    Description: The voluntary collection of narrative descriptions of 
projects financed by CDFI Fund awardees and allocates via the CDFI/CDE 
Project Profile Web Form. The purpose is to more fully describe and 
record the innovative approaches (Community Development Financial 
Institutions) CDFIs and (Community Development Entity) CDEs use in 
revitalizing communities and serving families, and impact that these 
CDFIs and CDEs are realizing.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 250 hours.
    OMB Number: 1559-0036
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved information 
collection.
    Title: Capital Magnet Fund Application.
    Form: CDFI 0003.
    Description: Under the Capital Magnet Fund (CMF) the Community 
Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund will provide 
competitively awarded grants to CDFIs and qualified nonprofit housing 
organizations to finance affordable housing and related community 
development projects.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,250 hours.
    CDFI Fund Clearance Officer: Ashanti McCallum, Community 
Development Financial Institutions Fund, Department of the Treasury, 
601 13th Street, NW., Suite 200 South, Washington, DC 20005; (202) 622-
9018
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, Office of Management and Budget, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-
7873

Dawn D. Wolfgang,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-24394 Filed 9-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-70-P
News United States Air Force
 New C-130J contract to save DOD millionsPublished June 5, 2016
                        
                        By Brian Brackens
                        
                        
                        88th Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS)  --**
                The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center's Mobility Directorate signed a multiyear contract with Lockheed Martin to procure 78 C-130J Super Hercules with the option to buy up to 83 over the next five years.The agreement is the second multiyear contract for the C-130J and it saves the Defense Department about $680 million and provides the Air Force, Navy and Coast Guard with important airlift capabilities."This contract is significant because it provides the taxpayer with the best bang for their buck and allows our customers, including the Marine Corps, Coast Guard, Air Force Special Operations Command, and Air Force Mobility Command, to save money and use it for other requirements," said Joseph Fountain, a supervisory contract officer with the Mobility Directorate and lead negotiator on the contract with Lockheed.Acquisition experts from the Mobility Directorate negotiated for three years to finalize the details of the contract which will provide new aircraft to replace legacy C-130H models and add to the J models currently in the Air Force fleet.The J model is an improvement on previous models in that it brings enhanced avionics and propulsion systems to the fight, providing additional aircraft range, higher maximum speed and shorter takeoff distance.According to Fountain, the benefit of multiyear contracts versus year-to-year contracts is that they provide stability and cut costs. It allows Lockheed to sign long term supplier agreements and commitments, and invest in new equipment to produce the aircraft.The contract also funds an affordability program in which Lockheed receives $35 million up front and agrees to $65 million in labor reductions over the life of the contract, which according to Fountain will allow the company to assemble the aircraft more efficiently.Kevin Buckley, the program executive officer for the Mobility Directorate, said that the contract is an example of the directorate's commitment to providing the warfighter with vital airlift capabilities at an affordable cost."The men and women on our team are motivated by the fact that the work we do directly impacts the warfighter," Buckley said. "I'm extremely proud of the team and I know we will continue to provide war-winning weapon systems."contract 



C-130J 



Air Force Life Cycle Management Center 



FM
Certification of Principal Financial Officer  In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) of Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc. (the Registrant), I, Frank Dalene, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Registrant.   Dated: May 21, 2009  /s/ Frank Dalene Frank Dalene
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Brigham Exploration
Company (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, for the period ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Ben M. Brigham, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, hereby certify that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 10, 2003

/s/ Ben M. Brigham
------------------
Ben M. Brigham
Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32
                                   ----------

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Globus International
Resources Corp(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 (the
"Report"), the undersigned each hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


        Date: AUGUST 31, 2005          /s/ YURY GREENE
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Yury Greene
                                       Chief Executive Officer


        Date: AUGUST 31, 2005          /s/ HERMAN ROTH
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Herman Roth, Chief Financial
                                       Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company, and forwarded to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.