alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 4D11-1495.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 5, 2011.

Roger P. Foley of the Law Office of Roger P. Foley, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laura Fisher, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Williams petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus, challenging the trial court’s order of pretrial detention after he failed to appear for calendar call in connection with his charge for failure to redeliver a hired vehicle.1 We grant the petition.

Williams offered an explanation for his failure to appear for calendar call in October 2010: as a member of the Florida National Guard, he was called up early in September by his special forces unit and was given only twenty-four hours notice to go into Africa, to a location where he had no opportunity to call his lawyer until approximately a month before the April 2011 bond hearing. No findings were made that his failure to appear was willful; the judge stated only that, although Williams *388might be in the military, his nonappearance was “not acceptable to me.” Further, it is clear from the record that the trial court made no findings that “that no conditions of release can reasonably protect the community from risk of physical harm to persons or assure the presence of the accused at trial,” a requirement of pretrial detention under section 907.041(4)(c)7., Florida Statutes (2010). *Blair v. State,*15 So.3d 758, 759 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), *approved,*39 So.3d 1190 (Fla.2010). Even if the trial court meant to indicate that it found the nonappearance to be willful, the further findings still were necessary. *Bannister v. Lamberti,*32 So.3d 745 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (holding that, even where willfulness of nonappearance is conceded, trial court ordering pretrial detention still must make finding that pretrial detention is necessary to assure defendant’s appearance at trial) (citing Blair).

We therefore grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus to the extent of remanding to the trial court to set an expedited hearing to determine whether Williams’s nonappearance for calendar call was willful and whether there are any reasonable conditions of release which would assure Williams’s presence at trial.

*Petition granted; case remanded for an expedited hearing.*

GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and MAY, JJ., concur.

1

. This was his second failure to appear in this case; however, his bond was reinstated after he failed to appear for arraignment. In his motion to reinstate that bond, he explained that neither he nor his bondsman was advised of the date of arraignment, a position which was supported by the bondsman’s sworn statement and affidavit to remain on bond.
#### Willie McGRIFF, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D10-3137.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 29, 2010.

Willie McGriff, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SHEPHERD and SALTER, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is the tenth post-judgment case brought to this Court by the defendant. All have been meritless, and at least those filed since 2007 have also been successive and frivolous. We affirm the trial court’s denial of the latest motion, but in doing so we find that “enough is enough.” *Isley v. State,*652 So.2d 409, 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Accordingly, Willie McGriff is now directed to show cause, within thirty days from the date of this opinion, why he should not be prohibited from filing any further pro se appeals, pleadings, motions, or petitions both here and in the lower court relating to his convictions and sentences in circuit court case numbers 91-20674; 85-32434; 86-749. Absent a show*524ing of good cause, we intend to direct the Clerk of the Third District Court of Appeal to refuse to accept any such papers relating to these circuit court case numbers unless they have been reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a duly licensed member of The Florida Bar in good standing.

Additionally, and absent a showing of good cause, any such further and unauthorized pro se filings by the defendant will subject him to appropriate sanctions. *See State v. Spencer,*751 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla.1999).

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from SEC Form 10-K and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       9,610,190              12,280,670
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,402,685               8,098,231
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  7,913,777               6,264,549
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,091,547              26,901,327
<PP&E>                                     289,211,129             292,048,991
<DEPRECIATION>                            (26,539,539)            (38,114,058)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             310,801,563             304,772,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,283,249              11,823,372
<BONDS>                                    104,521,718              98,704,745
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            10                      10
<OTHER-SE>                                (40,879,506)            (50,986,390)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               310,801,563             304,772,672
<SALES>                                     32,776,493              65,628,307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,004,162              67,155,957
<CGS>                                       12,050,495              26,245,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,583,843              34,328,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,467,372              11,923,022
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,302,645              31,011,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,754,858)            (10,106,884)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,754,858)            (10,106,884)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           (21,336,550)                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (26,091,408)            (10,106,884)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRITY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,041
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,910
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         314,873
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 327,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         30
<COMMON>                                           163
<OTHER-SE>                                     326,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   327,064
<SALES>                                         10,073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,122
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,674
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,674
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,377
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                       NEW DIRECTIONS MANUFACTURING, INC.

     We, the undersigned President and Secretary of NEW DIRECTIONS
MANUFACTURING, INC., do hereby certify as follows:

     That the Board of Directors of said corporation at a meeting duly convened,
held on January 4th, 2000 adopted a resolution to amend the Amended Articles of
Incorporation filed on January 9th, 1997 as follows:

     ARTICLE I is hereby amended to read as follows:

               That the name of the corporation is:
               AMERICAN SOIL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

     The number of shares of the corporation outstanding and entitled to vote on
an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is 5,052,270, that said amendment
has been commented to and approved by a majority vote of the stockholder holding
at least a majority of each class of stock outstanding and entitled to vote
thereon pursuant to the Schedule 14C Information Statement and the Action by
Majority Written Consent of Shareholders of NEW DIRECTIONS MANUFACTURING, INC.


                                        /s/ Sean Lee
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        President


                                        /s/ Jack Horner
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Secretary

Addendums:

The following were also adopted (see attached Board Resolution):

1. 15 old shares for 1 new share reverse stock split
2. New Officers and Board of Directors were elected
<PAGE>
                RESOLUTION OF NEW DIRECTIONS MANUFACTURING, INC.

The undersigned, Sean Lee, President, hereby certifies as follows:

That the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting held on the 4th of
January, 2000 adopted the following resolutions pursuant to the consent of
shareholders:

     RESOLVED, that the Articles of Incorporation be amended in the following
manner:

     Article one to be amended to change the corporation's name to AMERICAN SOIL
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

It was further RESOLVED that the commons tock of the Corporation be rolled back
resulting in a reverse-split of (1) new share for each 15 old shares.

It was further RESOLVED that all the issued and outstanding shares of AMERICAN
SOIL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. are to be exchanged for 336,818 post rollback shares of
restricted common stock of the Corporation.

It was further RESOLVED, that the following individuals are hereby elected to
the Board of Directors: Neil C. Kitchen, Louis Visco, Richard Stevens, Scott M.
Baker and Ken R. Lew.

The meeting was then adjourned. Dated January 4th, 2000.


/s/ Sean Lee
-------------------------------
Sean Lee
President
News United States Air Force
 Total force effort trains future KC-46 pilotsPublished May 14, 2016
                        
                        By Senior Airman David Bernal Del Agua
                        
                        
                        22nd Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs
                **MCCONNELL AIR FORCE BASE, Kan. (AFNS) --**
                A group of total force Airmen has been selected to participate in the initial operational test and evaluation of the KC-46 Pegasus as the Air Force prepares for the tanker’s arrival here.Each KC-46 will be equipped to receive fuel in flight and the crews who will fly during the IOTE will need to be trained in receiver air refueling."Since McConnell is the only base that has receptacle equipped KC-135 (Stratotankers), known as R/T or receiver/tanker, we are in the unique position to perform the training before crews depart for Boeing-led training in Miami and Seattle," said Maj. Christopher Markley, the 931st Air Refueling Wing’s KC-46 Program Integration Office reserve operations chief.The 931st ARW has been working closely with the 22nd ARW to build a training program to allow the IOTE crewmembers to become receiver pilots."Cooperation with the 22nd Operations Group training shop has allowed us to successfully train all of our required crewmembers without impacting mission effectiveness on the active-duty assets," Markley said. "In fact, the relationship has been so effective that several of our crewmembers are now R/T instructor pilots themselves and are able to train both active duty and reserve crews in the receiver mission, adding needed IPs to the base and ensuring training capacity."An Air National Guard crewmember from Pease ANG Base, New Hampshire, began his receiver training last week and will continue it for the next few weeks with Reserve and active-duty crews."So far I have found refueling as a receiver challenging to learn, but by no means insurmountable," said Lt. Col. Marc Zubricki, the 157th OG director of operations. "The instructors here have all been great to work with, and I have had the benefit of being scheduled for numerous events each week. With each flight I grow more comfortable flying so close behind the tanker."The training represents a culmination of cooperation between total force units."It's a great example of how the (total force integration) can benefit the Air Force overall," Markley said.KC-46 



air refueling 



total force Related Links
        KC-46A Pegasus
                                Feb. 1, 2016
                                The KC-46A is the first phase in recapitalizing the U.S. Air Force's aging tanker fleet. With greater refueling, cargo and aeromedical evacuation capabilities compared to the KC-135, the KC-46A will provide aerial refueling support to Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and partner-nation receivers.
#### St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company *v.*Sloan.

Opinion delivered May 17, 1926.

Railroads — negligence in killing dog. — Proof that defendant’s locomotive engineer could have seen plaintiff’s dog approaching the track 300 yards ahead of the train, in time to avoid killing him, *held*to sustain a verdict for the plaintiff.

Appeal from Crawford Circuit Court; *James Cochran,*Judge;

affirmed.

*E. T. Miller*and *Warner, Hardin $ Warner,*for appellant.

*71
      *George G.*Stoehard, for appellee.

McCulloch, C. J.

Appellee sued appellant for the value of a dog killed by one of appellant’s trains at the station of Rudy, in Crawford County, Arkansas. The dog was killed by a northbound passenger train which did not stop at Rudy and was traveling at a speed of about forty miles per hour. It occurred just before sunset.

'There is a trestle 1,260 feet south of the station, and the track is-straight from that point northward beyond the station. The dog was killed on the track opposite the station platform, and a witness introduced by appellee testified that he saw the dog on the station platform, walking northward beside the track, but was “angling” toward the track; that the train at that time was crossing the trestle south of the station, and, just before the train reached the station platform, the dog walked onto the track and was struck and killed.

The evidence in the ease tends to show that the crossing whistle was blown at or near the trestle, and nothing else was done toward avoiding the killing of the dog. The engineer testified that he was keeping a lookout, but did not see the dog and knew nothing of the killing until it was reported to him afterwards. Another witness introduced by appellant testified that the dog was walking north on the platform a short distance east of the track, and that, when the train was thirty or forty steps south of the station, the dog started to cross the track, and was walking up the middle of the track when struck by the train. The jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee, and fixed the damage at the sum of fifty dollars.

.. The only question raised here is the legal sufficiency of the evidence. We have concluded, that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict.. At a distance of about 1,260 feet the engineer either saw, or, if keeping a lookout, could have seen, the dog walking along the platform near the railroad track and in the direction of the track — “angling toward the track,” as stated by one of the witnesses, and nothing was done thereafter to *72avoid the injury. The perilous position of the dog was discovered, or could have been discovered, in time to have prevented the injury; at least the jury could have so found from the testimony.

Affirmed.
## NO. 12

- 21

- 00008

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

D & G DIRECTIONAL D RILLING,

INC.

, APPELLANT

V.

WYATT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,

INC.

, APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 402ND

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

WOOD COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant , D & G Directional Dril ling, Inc., filed a motion to dism iss this appeal. The

motion states that the parties reached a settlement agreement

. No decision has been delivered in

this appeal. Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed

.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42. 1 (a).

Opinion delivered June 30, 2021.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TE XAS

JUDGMENT

JUNE 30 , 2021

NO. 12

- 21

- 00008

- CV

D & G DIRECTION AL DRI LLING, INC.

, Appellant

V.

WYATT CONS TRUCTION COMPANY, INC.

, Appellee

Appeal from the 402nd District Court

of Wood County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2020

- 464 )

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDER ED, ADJUDGED and

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Wo rthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J

.
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
OF ADVOCAT INC.
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
  (a)
    
    fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  /s/ William R. Council, IIIWilliam R. Council, IIIChief Executive Officer/s/ L. Glynn Riddle, Jr.L. Glynn Riddle, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
#### Samuel SUTTER v. Linda SUTTER.

No. 2011-CC-2146.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Sutter, Samuel; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 2010-10441; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 CW 1454.

Denied.
exhibit1024.htm -- Converted by SEC Publisher, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing





Exhibit 10.24

Technical Services Agreement

[Chinese translation]

Between: EcoloCap Solutions Canada Inc. (EcoloCap)

740 St Maurice suite 102 

Montreal QC H3C 1L5

Tel: 0015148763907 Fax: 0015148764080

And

Shandong Chengzeyuan Environment Protection Engineering Co., Ltd. 

[Chinese translation]

Address: Xisi Road 265, Dongying City, Shandong Province, CHINA 

[Chinese translation] 

Telephone: 15345451111 

Fax: 0546-8206866 

Email: chengzeyuan_xiao@163.com 

President: [Chinese translation]/Li Shengguo

Re: Technical services for CDM project: Treatment of Urban Domestic Refuse and 

Resource Utilization in Pingyuan County [Chinese translation]

Whereby EcoloCap Solutions (Canada) Inc. will perform for Chengzeyuan necessary technical services for the validation of its CDM projects.

EcoloCap [Chinese translation]

In consideration of these services rendered as well as expenses incurred, EcoloCap shall be paid by Chengzeyuan professional fees for this project and EcoloCap shall be paid a fee for its services which is calculated as follows: [Chinese translation]

Amount paid = 10% x Net Revenues from CER [Chinese translation]

Net Revenues = Total validated quantity of CER multiplied by 9 Euro – 50,000 Euro 

(First year) 

[Chinese translation] 

Net Revenues = Total validated quantity of CER multiplied by 9 Euro (following years) 

[Chinese translation]






EcoloCap shall be responsible for the preparation of these technical documents (PIN, PDD, etc.) and shall make best efforts to assist Chengzeyuan in the approval processes of these projects by local authorities as well as by the DOE and the EB. All the expenses incurred above will be borne by EcoloCap.

[Chinese translation]

EcoloCap shall make best effort to help Chengzeyuan to get financial participation of foreign investors in the Project.

[Chinese translation]

We agree to the above and acknowledge receiving a copy of this agreement. [Chinese translation]

Dated this 21st day of October 2008.

[Chinese translation]



EcoloCap Solutions (Canada) Inc.

 

Per: DR. TRI VU TRUONG

Dr. Tri Vu Truong

President & CEO

Shandong Chengzeyuan Environment Protection Engineering Co., Ltd. 

[Chinese translation]

 

Per: LI, SHENGGUO

Mr. LI, Shengguo

Board Chairman
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5688]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    BILL PRESENTED TO THE PRESIDENT

  Mr. THOMAS, from the Committee on House Administration, reported that 
that committee did on the following date present to the President, for 
his approval, a bill of the House of the following title:

           On June 6, 1995:
       H.R. 1158. An act making emergency supplemental 
     appropriations for additional disaster assistance, for anti-
     terrorism initiatives, for assistance in the recovery from 
     the tragedy that occurred at Oklahoma City, and making 
     rescissions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, 
     and for other purposes.
     

                          ____________________
```