alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FOR THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SOUTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             307
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,236
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         58
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,837
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,875
<LOANS>                                         37,039
<ALLOWANCE>                                        293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,572
<DEPOSITS>                                      35,596
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                435
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  45,572
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    756
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   47
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    63
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   866
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 429
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 429
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              437
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    194
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         194
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       121
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.95
<LOANS-NON>                                        938
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   293
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  293
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               293
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7419

JIMMIE NELSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BERKELEY COUNTY; JAMES H. ROZIER, JR., Berkeley County Supervisor, in his individual and

official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-94-713-2-18AJ)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 20, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmie Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra J. Senn, STUCKEY & SENN,

Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Appellant's previously filed interlocutory appeal of the

district court's September 26, 1994, denial of his motion to amend

his complaint is ripe at this juncture.

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint,* and its final

order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinions accepting the magistrate judge's recommendations and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. Nelson v. Berkeley County, No.

CA-94-713-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 1994; July 18, 1996). We note

that Appellant filed this appeal after the effective date of the

Prisoner Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"); because Appellant no

longer is incarcerated, the PLRA requirements do not apply to him,

and we overrule Appellees' objection to Appellant proceeding without prepayment of filing fees and costs. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
News United States Air Force
 Power restored at Incirlik Air BasePublished July 22, 2016
                        
                        
                        From a U.S. European Command news release
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Commercial electric power was restored July 22 to Incirlik Air Base in Turkey, U.S. European Command officials said.The base was without power since July 16, and was operating on backup generator power, officials said. Generated electric power capability will be maintained for the base should the commercial electricity be interrupted again.Meanwhile, there is a steady flow of hot food, water and fuel to support U.S. service members and civilians in Turkey.The United States, in close coordination with the Turkish military, will continue to work toward ensuring that the Incirlik base, the U.S. service members who live and work on it, and the operations occurring there remain fully prepared to take on a myriad of missions as part of efforts to defeat terrorism, officials said.OIR 



Incirlik AB 



USAFE 



EUCOM 



turkey
#### FLEET INTERMODAL SERVICES, LLC v. ST. BERNARD PORT, HARBOR AND TERMINAL DISTRICT.

No. 2011-C-0612.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2011.

*118In re Fleet Intermodal Services LLC; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 112-452; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-1485.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1386 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1386

To repeal a provision enacted to end Federal matching of State spending 
                  of child support incentive payments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2007

  Mr. McDermott (for himself, Mr. Emanuel, Mr. Arcuri, Mr. Stark, Mr. 
  Levin, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Davis of Alabama, Ms. Castor, Mr. 
Kagen, Mr. Hall of New York, and Mr. Ellison) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal a provision enacted to end Federal matching of State spending 
                  of child support incentive payments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Support Protection Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PROVISION ENACTED TO END FEDERAL MATCHING OF STATE 
              SPENDING OF CHILD SUPPORT INCENTIVE PAYMENTS.

    Section 7309 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
#### Nicholas AGATHEAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D06-4870.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 15, 2012.

Richard L. Rosenbaum of Arnstein & Lehr, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA*

DAMOORGIAN, J.

We reconsider on remand our opinion in *Agatheas v. State,*28 So.3d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), which was quashed by the Florida Supreme Court in *Agatheas v. State,*77 So.3d 1232 (Fla.2011). Consistent with the supreme court’s holding that the admission of the 45-caliber revolver, photographs of the gun, bandana, and latex gloves found in Agatheas’s backpack, was error, we conclude that Agatheas was denied a fair trial by the cumulative effect *1291of the admission of this irrelevant and inadmissible evidence elicited by the State. *See Penalver v. State,*926 So.2d 1118, 1137 (Fla.2006) (providing that where multiple errors exists, courts must consider whether the cumulative effect of those errors deprives the defendant of a fair trial) (citing *Nowitzke v. State, 572*So.2d 1346, 1350 (Fla.1990)).

Accordingly, we reverse Agatheas’s conviction and sentence and remand for a new trial.

*Reversed.*

MAY, C.J., and CIKLIN, J., concur.
#### William KLEINSCHMIDT, Appellant, v. THREE HORIZONS NORTH CONDOMINIUM, INC., Appellee.

No. 3D10-2737.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 25, 2012.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 1, 2012.

William E. Kleinschmidt, in proper person.

Becker & Poliakoff and David H. Rogel, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before SHEPHERD, SALTER and EMAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.315(a).

Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.410(a), William E. Kleinsch-midt, is ordered to show cause within ten days of the date of this opinion, why this court should not impose sanctions, including prohibiting Mr. Kleinschmidt from filing further appeals and assessing fees and costs against him. The Appellee may respond within five days thereafter.

Affirmed; Appellant ordered to show cause.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-QSB FOR
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         813,251
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     84,677
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               912,923
<PP&E>                                          30,883
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 943,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,489
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,400
<OTHER-SE>                                     939,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   943,806
<SALES>                                          1,389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,667
<CGS>                                              403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                71,904
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (60,640)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (60,640)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (60,640)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.003)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Norris HENLEY.

No. 2011-KK-2005.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Henley, Norris; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. H, No. 505-052; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1120.

Denied.
#### JMP INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CERTAIN INTERESTED UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S LONDON, Subscribing to Certificate No. BU04881 (“Lloyd’s Underwriters’ Non-Marine Association”) and the Hideaway Marina Limited Partnership, a Florida limited partnership, Appellees.

No. 4D10-1140.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 28, 2011.

John R. Gillespie, Jr., Lighthouse Point, for appellant.

Matthew L. Litsky and Jason A. Herman of Phelps Dunbar LLP, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*Affirmed. See Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd’s v. Chabad Lubavitch of Greater Fort Lauderdale, Inc.,*65 So.Sd 67 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., and MARX, KRISTA, Associate Judge, concur.
News United States Air Force
 10 AF captains selected for Inter-American Squadron Officer SchoolPublished Sept. 21, 2016
                        
                        By Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Ten captains have been selected to attend the 2017 Inter-American Squadron Officer School at the Inter-American Air Forces Academy here in fiscal year 2017. 
Selected to attend are Capts. Ruben Adornorodriguez, Ricardo Basora-Rovira, Edward Camacho, Nathan Elowe, Patricia Encarnacion-Miranda, Ruben Gomez, Aisha Lemos, Christian Martinez, Jose Torres, and Angel Vazquez-Pagan. Twelve alternates were also selected.
“The ISOS program is designed to develop dynamic Airmen ready to lead air, space and cyberspace power in an expeditionary war-fighting environment,” said Capt. Brian Gunn, officer workforce development support chief. “Students practice leadership and managerial skills, using lessons in military ethics, Air Force core values and human rights.”
Students also develop their knowledge of the use of airpower, including basic theories of warfare and the increasing role of aerospace and information systems in the joint environment, Gunn said.
ISOS mirrors the Squadron Officer School in-residence course at Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, but includes additional objectives such as developing inter-American awareness and a cadre of potential Latin American regional affairs specialists, Gunn said. Program graduates will also earn primary developmental education credit through Air University.
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to the myPers website. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following these instructions on the Air Force Retirees Services website.AFPC 



SOS 



diversity 



JBSA 



FM
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 148 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 148

To require the Surface Transportation Board to consider certain issues 
when deciding whether to authorize the construction of a railroad line.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Surface Transportation Board to consider certain issues 
when deciding whether to authorize the construction of a railroad line.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Neighborhood Rail Accountability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 10901 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsections:
    ``(e) In determining whether to issue a certificate authorizing the 
construction of an additional railroad line, or the construction of an 
extension to any railroad line, the Board shall give greater weight to 
local official statements and public comments in opposition to the 
proposed construction, especially with respect to construction in a 
residential area, if there is an unusually high level of such public 
opposition.
    ``(f) Before issuing a certificate under this section authorizing 
the construction of an additional railroad line, or the construction of 
an extension to any railroad line, the Board shall identify any 
disproportionate negative impacts on any socioeconomic population, and 
shall include a discussion of alternatives that were considered that 
would have avoided such disproportionate negative impacts.
    ``(g) If the Board receives information indicating that an 
applicant for a certificate under this section has provided to the 
Board false information that could materially affect the Board's 
determination, the process of considering the application shall be 
halted until the Board has determined whether such information has been 
provided, and whether the information was knowingly provided. If the 
Board determines that such information has been provided unknowingly, 
the Board shall require the applicant to provide correct information 
before the process may resume. If the Board determines that such 
information has been provided knowingly, the Board shall not issue a 
certificate pursuant to that application.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### John T. BRYANT and Moriah Bryant, Appellants, v. REYNOLDS GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC., Appellee.

No. 5D10-2412.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Sept. 16, 2011.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 13, 2011.

Mark S. Peters of Eisenmenger, Berry & Peters, P.A., Viera, for Appellants.

Pierre A.L. Mommers of Pierre A.L. Mommers, P.A., Mommers & Colombo, Melbourne, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

EVANDER, J., dissents with opinion.

EVANDER, J.,

dissenting.

While I acknowledge that the “abuse of discretion” standard of review is a deferential one, I believe a reversal is required. *905Given the ultimate outcome below, this was an ideal case for the trial court to hold that neither side was the “prevailing party” and to decline to make an award of attorney’s fees. *See, e.g., Merchants Bonding Co. (Mutual) v. City of Melbourne,*832 So.2d 184 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); *Brevard County Fair Ass’n v. Cocoa Expo, Inc.,*832 So.2d 147 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); *Lasco Enters., Inc. v. Kohlbrand,*819 So.2d 821 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Awards.                    

*Date:*                         October 7, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Courtyard Marriott Crystal City, 2899 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Keith A. Mintzer, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7186, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0280,                         *mintzerk@nhlbi.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 17, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-23856 Filed 9-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended May
17, 2004, of CKE Restaurants, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Theodore Abajian,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
Section 78m(a) or Section 780(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. In witness whereof, the undersigned has executed and delivered this
certificate as of the date set forth opposite his signature below. Date: December 17, 2004
    
    /s/ Theodore AbajianTheodore AbajianChief Financial Officer