alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Geralyn Adgia Lambert HARTMAN v. Wesley Wood LAMBERT.

No. 2012-C-0148.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 2012.

In re Hartman, Geralyn Adgia Lambert; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 07-C-2412; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 11-306.

Denied.

KNOLL, J., would grant the writ.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 13 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to conduct a study to determine the 

feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply for Rialto, Fontana, 

and Colton, California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. BACA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to conduct a study 

to determine the feasibility of carrying out a project 

for water supply for Rialto, Fontana, and Colton, California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Inland Empire Water 

5 Resources Preservation Act’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 13 IH

1 SEC. 2. RIALTO, FONTANA, AND COLTON, CALIFORNIA. 

2 The Secretary of the Army shall conduct a study to 

3 determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for 

4 water supply for Rialto, Fontana, and Colton, California. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### Hendrickien DeZwaan v. Jan DeZwaan.

*Divorce*— Extreme *cruelty.*

A husband who forces his wife to do more work than she is capable of performing in her state of health, which is delicate, and thus compels her to leave him, is guilty of such extreme cruelty as entitles her to a divorce.

Appeal from Allegan. (Arnold, J.)

Argued March 8 and 9, 1892.

Decided April 8, 1892.

Bill for divorce. Defendant appeals.

Decree affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Gerrit J. Diekema,*for complainant.

*Philip Padgham.*for defendant.

Morse, C. J.

The complainant was granted a divorce from defendant in the Allegan circuit court in chancery on the ground of extreme Cruelty. .

The parties are Hollanders. The complainant, a young girl of 20, in delicate health, married the defend*280ant, a well-to-do farmer, 40 years of age, with a family of six children by former marriages. The cruelty consisted in the forcing of his wife to do more work than she was capable of doing in her state of health, and for that reason she was compelled to leave him. Before marriage he was made acquainted with her condition, and promised, to hire a girl to do the heavy work. After marriage he refused to fulfill his promise in this respect. The record shows no brutality or unkindness, except in regard to his insistence that his wife should perform household and other labor when she was not able to do so. His conduct seems to have been inspired by greed, and it is shown by her testimony that he told complainant that he was glad the baby was dead, because now she could work instead of holding the baby in *her*lap. He required her also to do the family washing but a few days after the birth of her child. These things are •denied by him, and it may be that the charges against him have been exaggerated by some of the witnesses. It is evident, however, that he has been extremely cruel in his demands upon the complainant for labor, and that his chief appreciation of a wife as a helpmate is her willingness and capacity for hard work.

The decree of the court below is affirmed, with costs of this Court, and an additional solicitor’s fee of $70.

The other Justices concurred.
#### Christopher BROWN, et al. v. SUTHERLAND LUMBER, INCORPORATED, et al.

No. 2011-CP-0411.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2011.

In re Brown, Christopher M.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 195,641; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-469.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1434 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1434

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 896 Pittsburgh Street in Springdale, Pennsylvania, as the ``Rachel 
                     Carson Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2007

 Mr. Altmire (for himself, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Mr. Carney, Mr. 
Dent, Mr. Doyle, Mr. English of Pennsylvania, Mr. Fattah, Mr. Gerlach, 
 Mr. Holden, Mr. Kanjorski, Mr. Patrick J. Murphy of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
 Tim Murphy of Pennsylvania, Mr. Murtha, Mr. Peterson of Pennsylvania, 
   Mr. Pitts, Mr. Platts, Ms. Schwartz, Mr. Sestak, and Mr. Shuster) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 896 Pittsburgh Street in Springdale, Pennsylvania, as the ``Rachel 
                     Carson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RACHEL CARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 896 Pittsburgh Street in Springdale, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Rachel Carson Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Rachel 
Carson Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Andrew  Hamer,  Vice  President and Chief  Financial  Officer of Keynote
Systems, Inc. (the "Company"),  do hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:


     o    the Annual  Report on Form  10-K/A of the  Company  for the year ended
          September  30,  2006,  as filed  with the  Securities  and o  Exchange
          Commission on December 13, 2006 (the  "Report"),  fully  complies with
          the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
          Act of 1934; and

     o    the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company for the periods presented therein.


Date: March 12, 2006


        /s/ ANDREW HAMER
------------------------------------------------
            Andrew Hamer
   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
      (Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Keynote Systems, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
23.1
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 Silverleaf
Resorts, Inc
 Dallas,
Texas
  We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-64763 and 333-118474) and in the Registration Statement on Form
S-3 (Nos. 333-134888 and 333-146854) of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. of our
reports dated March 11, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial
statements and the effectiveness of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc.’s internal control
over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
  
 /s/ BDO
Seidman, LLP
 Dallas,
Texas
 March 11,
2008
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1104** 

RONNIE A. BELL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

JUDGE W. EARL BRITT , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:15

- cv
- 00629

- BO )

Submitted : May 26 , 2016 Decided: May 31, 2016

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Ronnie A. Bell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Ronnie A. Bell appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his civil complaint after a review pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (B) (20 12 ). We have reviewed the record and
find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Bell v.
Britt , No. 5:15

- cv
- 00629

- BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argumen t because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 13

                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with this annual report on Form 20-F of Tevecap S.A. for the
period ended December 31, 2002, Leila Abraham Loria, Chief Executive Officer of
Tevecap S.A. and Carlos Eduardo Malagoni, Chief Financial Officer of Tevecap
S.A., each hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. this Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2. the information contained in this Form 20-F for the period ended December 31,
2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Tevecap S.A.


Date: July 15, 2003                                 /s/ Leila Abraham Loria
                                                    -----------------------
                                                    Leila Abraham Loria
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


Date: July 15, 2003                                 /s/ Carlos Eduardo Malagoni
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                    Carlos Eduardo Malagoni
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Tevecap S.A. and will be retained by Tevecap S.A. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       59
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLORP00000.L10200000.PI0000; Hag10-0119]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Meeting Notice for the John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council (JDSRAC) will meet as indicated below:

# DATES:

The JDSRAC meeting will begin 8 a.m. PST on February 24, 2010.

# ADDRESSES:

The JDSRAC will meet at the Oxford Suites Pendleton, 2400 SW Court Place, Pendleton, Oregon 97801.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The meeting agenda includes new member orientation, setting the calendar for 2010 meetings, election of officers for 2010, Baker Resource Management Plan RAC Involvement, Sub-Committee Reports, and other matters as may reasonably come before the council. The public is welcome to attend all portions of the meeting and may make oral comments to the Council at 1 p.m. on February 24, 2010. Those who verbally address the JDSRAC are asked to provide a                     *written*                     statement of their comments or presentation. Unless otherwise approved by the JDSRAC Chair, the public comment period will last no longer than 15 minutes, and each speaker may address the JDSRAC for a                           ( print page 5804)                        maximum of five minutes. If reasonable accommodation is required, please contact the BLM's Prineville District at (541) 416-6889 as soon as possible.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Christina Lilienthal, Public Affairs Specialist, 3050 NE Third, Prineville, OR 97754, (541) 416-6889 or e-mail:                         *christina_lilienthal@blm.gov*.                    

Dated: January 29, 2010.

Deborah J. Henderson-Norton,

District Manager, Prineville District Office.

[FR Doc. 2010-2426 Filed 2-3-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
#### Bull & Scarborough v. F. H. Chenault et al.

(No. 2900.)

Appeal from Red River County.

W. J. Swain and Geo. F. Burdett, counsel for appellants.

Sims & Wright, counsel for appellees.

Opinion by

Will-son, J.

*459October 17, 1888.

§ 383. *Limitation; absence from the state stops the-running of, when; case stated.*This suit was instituted hy appellants in the county court on January 6, 1888, against appellees upon a judgment recovered by the former against the latter, in the state of Mississippi, of date October 5, 1880. Appellees pleaded the statute of limitations of the state of Mississippi, which statute bars an action upon a judgment after the lapse of seven years from the rendition thereof. Appellants replied to said plea that before the rendition of said judgment appellees had removed from the state of Mississippi to the state of Texas, and had continuously resided in the state of Texas, and been absent from the state of Mississippi ever since their removal as aforesaid. This reply is based upomarticle 2618 of the Revised Statutes of Mississippi. The allegations in said reply were proved by the evidence. A jury having been waived, the judge sustained the plea of the statute of limitations, and rendered judgment that appellants take nothing by th’eir suit, etc. *Held,*that the judgment is erroneous. Under article 2618 of the Revised Statutes of Mississippi, the statute of limitations of that state has never commenced to run in favor of appellees because of their absence from said state and residence in Texas. It would not begin to run in their favor until their return to Mississippi. [62 Miss. 763; 60 id. 839; 57 id. 739; Wood on Lim. § 244 *et*seg.]

Reversed and remanded.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1402 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

320 South Lecanto Highway in Lecanto, Florida, as the ‘‘Sergeant 

Dennis J. Flanagan Lecanto Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2007 

Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida (for herself, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of 

Florida, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. MILLER of Florida, 

Ms. CASTOR, Mr. CRENSHAW, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. 

YOUNG of Florida, Mr. FEENEY, Mr. KLEIN of Florida, Mr. KELLER of 

Florida, Mr. MACK, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. PUTNAM, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, 

Mr. MICA, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. MEEK of Florida, Mr. WEXLER, 

Mr. MAHONEY of Florida, Mr. BOYD of Florida, and Mr. STEARNS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 320 South Lecanto Highway in Lecanto, Florida, as the ‘‘Sergeant Dennis J. Flanagan Lecanto Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1402 IH

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT DENNIS J. FLANAGAN LECANTO 

2 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 320 South Lecanto Highway in 

5 Lecanto, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Sergeant Dennis J. Flanagan Lecanto Post Office Build7 ing’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Dennis J. 

12 Flanagan Lecanto Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
WILLIAM JOSEPH MANN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-2704

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 13, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Nassau County.

Robert M. Foster, Judge.

William Joseph Mann, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jillian H. Reding, Assistant Attorney General 

and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

William Joseph Mann appeals the summary denial of his motion seeking 

postconviction relief brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 
2

3.800(a). For the reasons discussed below, we reverse and remand for further 

proceedings.

The appellant originally filed a postconviction motion pursuant to Florida 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 seeking additional jail credit, which was 

summarily denied on the merits. On appeal, this Court reversed and remanded with 

instructions for the trial court to either attach records refuting the appellant’s claim 

or enter an order providing the appellant with leave to amend his facially insufficient 

motion. See Mann v. State, 160 So. 3d 554, 555 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). On remand, 

the trial court provided the appellant with an opportunity to amend.

Instead of filing an amended motion seeking jail credit, the appellant filed the 

instant rule 3.800(a) motion, seeking credit for time previously spent in prison on 

the incarcerative term of his original probationary split sentence pursuant to Dortly 

v. State, 107 So. 3d 1229, 1230 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). The lower court summarily 

denied the motion, indicating that the appellant was awarded one day of jail credit 

and failed to object to this credit at sentencing. In support of its order, the court 

attached the sentencing transcripts. However, in response to this Court’s Toler1

order, the state properly concedes that these attachments do not refute the appellant’s 

claim.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand for further 

 

1 Toler v. State, 493 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
3

proceedings. If the trial court again summarily denies the motion, the court shall 

attach record excerpts which conclusively refute the appellant’s entitlement to prison 

credit.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

WOLF, WETHERELL and MARSTILLER, J.J., CONCUR.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Virtual Communications,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jonathan Morgan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and results of
operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2003 |  | /s/ Jonathan Morgan                  
|                      |  |                                      
|                      |  | Jonathan Morgan                      
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise
subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference.