alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6364
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KEVIN HOWELL, a/k/a William Anthony Johnson, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-94-20, CA-96-406-2) Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 6, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Howell, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Cannon, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Howell , Nos. CR-94-20, CA-96-406-2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Dennis W. BYARS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF WATERBURY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-9353.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 5, 2001.

*38Dennis W. Byars, Waterbury, CT, pro se.

Cheryl E. Hricko, Waterbury, CT, for defendant-appellee.

Present POOLER and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.*

*

 The Honorable Jose A. Cabranes was originally scheduled to participate in deciding this appeal but recused himself due to a disqualification. The remaining two members of the panel, who agree on the disposition, issue this order pursuant to 2d Cir.R. § 0.14(a),(b). *See Murray v. National Broad. Co., Inc.,*35 F.3d 45, 47-48 (2d Cir.1994).

SUMMARY ORDER

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED.

Byars appeals from the September 30, 1999, judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Squatrito, *J.)*awarding him $150,202.29 in back pay plus statutory interest, attorneys’ fees and costs. A trial jury found that racially discriminatory hiring practices of the defendant City of Waterbury violated Title VII. Specifically, Byars claimed that the city twice did not hire him as Superintendent of Public Buildings, a position for which he was qualified, because of his race. The district court determined the back pay calculation based on the date Byars would have been hired to the disputed position and the date that the city eliminated the job title. The district court also ruled that Byars was not entitled to compensatory damages because the discriminatory incidents took place prior to enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a. On appeal, plaintiff challenges the district court’s ruling regarding compensatory damages, its calculation of the back pay award, and its refusal to award front pay. After carefully reviewing the record before us, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Compensatory damages were not available to plaintiffs at the time of Byars’ injury. *See Landgraf v. USI Film Prods.,*511 U.S. 244, 283, 114 S.Ct. 1483, 128 L.Ed.2d 229 (1994). In addition, the district court made no error in its calculation of back pay and its denial of front pay. We have considered all of plaintiff-appellant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.
#### John Webb v. Waters, Bivens & Corley.

(No. 881, Op. Book No. 2, p. 691.)

Appeal from — County.

November 23, 1880.

Opinion by

Walker, P. J.

§ 1349. *Payment of a note given for land cannot be resisted where there is a general warranty, no fraud or ignorance, and no eviction.*Where the vendee gives his note for the purchase money, and takes a deed with general warranty, and there is no fraud on the part of the vendor, nor ignorance on the part of the vendee as to a defect in the title, the vendee cannot successfully resist the payment of the note unless he has been evicted; proof of a paramount outstanding title in a third person is no defense. [Brock v. Southwick, 10 Tex. 65; Baldridge v. Cook, 27 Tex. 565.]

Affirmed.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1236 

AN ACT 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the United States Postal Service to issue a 

semipostal to raise funds for breast cancer research. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1236 EH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY. 

2 Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is 

3 amended by striking ‘‘2007’’ and inserting ‘‘2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

5 The National Institutes of Health and the Depart6 ment of Defense shall each submit to Congress and the 

7 Government Accountability Office an annual report con8 cerning the use of any amounts that it received under sec9 tion 414(c) of title 39, United States Code, including a 

10 description of any significant advances or accomplish11 ments, during the year covered by the report, that were 

12 funded, in whole or in part, with such amounts. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 30, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1236 

AN ACT 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend 

cancer research. to issue a semipostal to raise funds for breast the authority of the United States Postal Service
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of BEA Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Alfred S. Chuang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Date: November 14, 2007



/s/    ALFRED S.
CHUANGAlfred S. ChuangChief Executive Officer
<PAGE>


                                 April 15, 2003
                                                                  (212) 838-8040

Mr. K. Tucker Andersen
61 Above All Road
Warren, CT 06754

                         New Line of Credit for $900,000
                                       and
                     Extension of Maturity Date on $500,000
                         Owed Under 2001 Line of Credit

Dear Tucker:

         This will confirm that you have opened a new line of credit for
Milestone Scientific Inc., in the aggregate amount of $900,000. Borrowings under
line will bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum and will be evidenced by a
promissory note in usual form. Monies may be drawn by Milestone under the line
upon 10 days' written notice to you from either Milestone's Chief Executive
Officer or Chief Financial Officer. The line will expire and borrowings under
the line and interest thereon will be payable in cash on January 2, 2005.

         This will also confirm that you have agreed to further extend the
payment date of the $500,000 owed under the Line of Credit dated January 29,
2001, which is not now payable in stock at Milestone's election, from December
31, 2003 until January 2, 2005.

         This letter replaces and cancels the commitment in our earlier letter
dated April 8, 2003 which you countersigned.

         If this conforms with your understanding with Milestone please
countersign and return the copy of this letter.

                                                     Very truly yours

                                                     /s/ Stephen A. Zelnick
Accepted and agreed to
this 15th day of April, 2003

/s/ K. Tucker Andersen
---

Exhibit 13.1

Certifications of the CEO AND CFOPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Merus Labs
International Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended September 30,
2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), Ahmad Doroudian as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Andrew Patient as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his or her knowledge, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                  
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Company.

|Date: | April 16, 2012
|----- | --------------

|By: | /s/ AHMAD DOROUDIAN           
|--- | ------------------------------
|    |                               
|    | Name: Ahmad Doroudian         
|    | Title: Chief Executive Officer
|    |                               
|    |                               
|By: | /s/ ANDREW PATIENT            
|    |                               
|    | Name: Andrew Patient          
|    | Title: Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of ss. 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                             McLEODUSA INCORPORATED

                      COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
                 (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED         SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                           JUNE 30,                  JUNE 30,
                                                                    -----------------------   -----------------------
                                                                       1998         1997         1998         1997
                                                                    ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
<S>                                                                 <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Computation of weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding:
Common shares, Class A, outstanding at the
 beginning of the period.........................................      62,506       36,920       61,799       36,173
Common shares, Class B, outstanding at the
 beginning of the period (A).....................................         ---       15,626          ---       15,626
Weighted average number of shares issued
 during the period...............................................         138           37          637          657
                                                                     --------     --------     --------     --------
Weighted average number of common shares.........................      62,644       52,583       62,436       52,456
                                                                     ========     ========     ========     ========
Net loss.........................................................    $(29,791)    $(16,496)    $(60,058)    $(29,851)
                                                                     ========     ========     ========     ========
Loss per common share............................................    $  (0.47)      $(0.31)    $  (0.96)      $(0.57)
                                                                     ========     ========     ========     ========
</TABLE>

(A) The Class B common stock, $.01 par value per share is convertible on a one-
    for-one basis at any time at the option of the holder into Class A common
    stock.  As of June 30, 1998, all shares of Class B common stock had been
    converted into shares of Class A common stock.
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERNAL
CONTROL STRUCTURE RELATIVE TO THE SERVICING OF
AUTOMOBILE LOAN RECEIVABLES


The management of the Bank is responsible for establishing and maintaining
the internal control structure.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected
benefits and related costs of control procedures.  The objectives of an
internal control structure are to provide management with reasonable, but
not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from
unauthorized use or disposition, and that transactions are executed in
accordance with management's authorization and recorded properly to permit
the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles.

We have performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Bank's
internal control structure based on the criteria established in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") relative to the servicing
of automobile loan receivables owned by Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trusts
Series 1995-2, 1996-1, 1996-2, 1997-1, 1997-2, 1997-3, 1997-4, 1998-1
and 1998-2 (collectively referred to as the "Trusts" herein) as of
September 30, 1999, and we have determined that the Bank maintained an
effective internal control structure over financial reporting relative
to the servicing of automobile loan receivables owned by the Trusts as
of September 30, 1999.

However, there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal
control structure, including the possibility of human error and the
circumvention or overriding of controls.  Accordingly, even an effective
internal control structure can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to reliability of financial statements and safeguarding and
management of assets.  Furthermore, the effectiveness of any internal
control structure can change with changes in circumstances.



_______________________		_________________________
Kevin B. Cashen		         	Larry C. Cain
Senior Vice President    		Senior Vice President



_______________________		__________________________
George P. Clancy, Jr.	    	Stephen R. Halpin, Jr.
Executive Vice President   Executive Vice President and
		                       		Chief Financial Officer

October 20, 1999
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: May 17Published May 17, 2016
                        
                        By Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- This look around the Air Force takes us to California where explosive ordnance disposal Airmen are participating in exercise Half-Life; and to Hulburt Field, Florida, for exercise Emerald Warrior. Hosted by Senior Airman Nicholas Koetz 
For previous episodes, click here.ATAF 



EOD 



Clear Lake 



Emerald Warrior 



Hurlburt Field 



AFSOC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          14,965
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     44,813
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          10,845
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            10,958
<LOANS>                                        168,032
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,758
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 265,252
<DEPOSITS>                                     231,602
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,458
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,175
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,016
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 265,252
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,983
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,557
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   160
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,700
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,273
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,359
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,341
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      412
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   5
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,479
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,479
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,717
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.23
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,916
<LOANS-PAST>                                       255
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     7
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     46
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,955
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      666
<RECOVERIES>                                        57
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,758
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,758
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Khadijah BROOKS v. Ula MINNIEWEATHER, John Doe, USAgencies Insurance Co. and State Farm Insurance Co.

No. 2012-C-0467.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 2012.

In re Brooks, Khadijah; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Morehouse, 4th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 2006-591; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,900-CA.

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 186 (Monday, September 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 59275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24138]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Cancer 
Etiology Study Section, October 7, 2010, 8 a.m. to October 8, 2010, 5 
p.m. Marina del Rey Marriott, 4100 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey, CA, 
90292 which was published in the Federal Register on August 31, 2010, 
75 FR 53317-53319.
    The meeting will be held at the Marina del Rey Hotel, 13534 Bali 
Way, Marina del Rey, CA 90292. The meeting dates and time remain the 
same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: September 20, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-24138 Filed 9-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Renal Care Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary A.
Brukardt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Gary A. Brukardt
--------------------------
Gary A. Brukardt
Chief Executive Officer
August 4, 2005