alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Sonic Jet Performance, Inc.
                               15662 Commerce Lane
                              Huntington Beach, CA

 January 2, 2002


 Dear Rao:

          This letter confirms that we have offered you employment with us on
 the following terms, to begin January 2, 2002:


1.   Your initial  position  will be President and CFO reporting to the Board of
     Directors.

2.   Your  monthly  base salary is $5,400.  In addition  you will be entitled to
     participate  in a bonus  program of up to 25% your annual base salary based
     upon achieving  designated  earnings  targets and positive cash flow of the
     business.  The terms of the bonus program will be outlined and agreed to by
     February 15, 2002.

3.   In addition to your base salary you will be entitled to receive stock equal
     to 250,000  shares  that will vest in equal  portions  over 2 years on each
     anniversary  of this letter based upon  continued  employment  through that
     complete period.

4.   You  are  entitled  to  receive  holidays,  vacation,  medical  and  dental
     insurance,  and other standard  Company  benefits,  all in accordance  with
     standard  Company  plans and any revisions  thereof.  Currently the Company
     does not offer any medical or dental benefits.

5.   You shall be reimbursed  for  reasonable  and necessary  business  expenses
     authorized and verified to Company's satisfaction.

6.   Your employment is at will. Either you or the Company may terminate this
     employment  relationship  at any time for any reason with or without cause.
     No one has the  authority  to change  this  except  by a written  agreement
     signed by both  parties.  Four weeks notice would be expected  from you and
     would  be  given  to  you  (or  pay  in  lieu  of  notice)  absent  unusual
     circumstances.

7.   We each mutually  agree to arbitrate any and all  differences,  claims,  or
     disputes, of every kind (statutory or other) arising out of your employment
     or its termination. Such arbitration would be in Orange County, California,
     or  other  mutually-agreed   location,   before  the  American  Arbitration
     Association, and in lieu of any court action.


     No other promises or representations have been made to you.

     Please sign below and return the original to me to accept employment.

                                             Very truly yours,


                                             George Moseman
                                             Director, Sonic Jet Performance


        Agreed to this ____ day of _______, 20__


        -----------------------------
        Madhava Rao Mankal
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.40


                             MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.
                            1997 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
                                AMENDMENT 1999-II


     WHEREAS, Meade Instruments Corp. (the "Corporation") maintains the Meade
Instruments Corp. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation approved the amendment
to the Plan set forth herein;

     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Section 1.4(b) of the Plan be, and it
hereby is, amended to read as follows:

     "(b) Share Limits. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be
     delivered pursuant to Awards (including Incentive Stock Options) granted to
     Eligible Persons under this Plan shall not exceed 2,000,000 shares (the
     `Share Limit'). The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be
     delivered under the provisions of Article 8 shall not exceed 150,000
     shares. The maximum number of shares subject to those Options and Stock
     Appreciation Rights that are granted during any calendar year to any
     individual shall be limited to 350,000 shares. Each of the three foregoing
     numerical limits shall be subject to adjustment as contemplated by this
     Section 1.4 and Section 6.2."

     RESOLVED FURTHER, that the foregoing Plan amendment shall be effective
immediately, subject, however, to stockholder approval of such amendment at the
next regularly scheduled meeting of stockholders.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused its duly authorized officer
to execute this Amendment 1999-II on this 7th day of April, 1999.


                                            MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.


                                            By:  /s/ Steven G. Murdock
                                                 -------------------------------
                                            Name: Steven G. Murdock
                                            Its:  President, Chief Operating
                                                  Officer and Secretary
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.3

                       Consent of Independent Accountants


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 14, 2001,
with respect to the financial statements of R4 Technical Center - North
Carolina, LLC for the period from April 28, 2000 (date of inception) to December
31, 2000, included in this current report on Form 10K/A of Blue Rhino
Corporation ("Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in
the following:

         o        Form S-8 (No. 333-80909) pertaining to the Company's Amended
                  and Restated Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors;

         o        Form S-8 (No. 333-80907) pertaining to the Company's 1994
                  Stock Incentive Plan;

         o        Form S-8 (No. 333-80911) pertaining to the Company's 1998
                  Stock Incentive Plan;

         o        Form S-8 (No. 333-94039) pertaining to the Company's Employee
                  Stock Purchase Plan.



                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Winston-Salem, North Carolina
March 30, 2001
**Exhibit
        23**
 
 
  CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We
        hereby
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
        on
        Forms S-8 (No. 333-127083, 333-121462, 333-92148, 333-45444,
        333-33536, 333-89547, 333-77471, 333-70439, and 333-62791) of Eclipsys
        Corporation of our report dated March 6, 2006 relating to the financial
        statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the
        effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
        of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form
        10-K.
 
 
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
        LLP
 Atlanta,
        Georgia
 March
        6,
        2006
583 A.2d 319

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DANIEL LEVERON DUGAS.

February 6, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
ANNUAL REPORT
Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 1997-1
$ 209,433,212 6.50% Auto Receivables Backed Certificates
For the Year Ended December 31, 1998




         PRINCIPAL    INTEREST      NET       NET        30 +      DELQ.
            DIST        DIST       LOSSES    LOSS %     DELQ.        %
        ____________ ___________ ___________ ________ ____________ _______
 Jan-98   6,013,909     854,084     959,441    7.50%   11,434,529    7.45%
 Feb-98   6,288,201     821,509     857,388    6.98%    9,759,946    6.62%
 Mar-98   5,774,181     787,448     586,377    4.96%    8,901,548    6.28%
 Apr-98   6,669,931     756,171     745,916    6.62%    9,019,616    6.67%
 May-98   5,868,708     720,042     450,711    4.18%    7,998,545    6.18%
 Jun-98   5,343,567     688,253     366,676    3.55%    7,766,104    6.27%
 Jul-98   5,236,528     659,309     357,934    3.62%    7,989,892    6.74%
 Aug-98   5,277,386     630,945     406,450    4.30%    7,693,567    6.78%
 Sep-98   4,655,066     602,359     309,473    3.42%    7,558,453    6.97%
 Oct-98   4,549,097     577,144     284,473    3.30%    6,869,917    6.63%
 Nov-98   4,901,443     552,503     365,759    4.45%    6,678,638    6.78%
 Dec-98   4,193,534     525,953     365,174    4.65%    6,990,415    7.42%
        ____________ ___________ ___________
 Totals  64,771,552   8,175,721   6,055,774

  **  The date represents the month of the Distribution date, the
      information is from activity of the previous month.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from DocuCorp
International, Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000


<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,459
<SECURITIES>                                 6,914
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                   675
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,813
<PP&E>                                       8,154
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,300
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       166
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,828
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,918
<SALES>                                     24,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            51,926
<CGS>                                        9,492
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               44,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (622)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               446
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,853
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,340
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,513
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,513
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .26



</TABLE>
Form of Purchase Order Terms and Conditions from National Tech. Leasing Corp.



 EXHIBIT 10.13 
  

	

	SHIP TO:    (Lessee)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	
	  	 SUPPLIER OF EQUIPMENT:    (Seller)
  
 Biolase Technology, Inc.
 981 Calle
Amanecer
 San Clemente, California 92673
  
  
  

	



	 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION
  
  
  
  
  
  
	  	PRICE
	


 PURCHASE ORDER TERMS AND CONDITIONS – READ CAREFULLY 
  
 THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS ONLY ACCEPTED BY SELLER SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
SELLERS’ SALES ORDERS. TITLE, AND ALL RISKS AND REWARDS OF OWNERSHIP SHALL TRANSFER TO BUYER UPON SHIPMENT OF THE EQUIPMENT 
  

	1.	 	Seller warrants that Seller has good and marketable title to the Equipment and that the Equipment will be (a) free of any claim by any third party and any security interest retained
by Seller, (b) new unless otherwise stated. 

  

	2.	 	Lessee is authorized to receive delivery of the Equipment as Buyer’s agent. All warranties and service normally accompanying the Equipment shall be extended by Seller directly
to Lessee. 

  

	3.	 	Seller will ship the Equipment to Lessee at the address indicated hereon within sixty (60) days of the Date of Purchase Order. Seller must promptly mail its invoice for the
Equipment to Buyer at the Bill To address set forth above. The Purchase Order Number should be clearly referenced on all invoices submitted to Buyer. 

  

	4.	 	Invoices shall be paid by Buyer, to Seller, within thirty (30) days or less, of the invoice date, unless otherwise stated and approved by Seller. 

  

	5.	 	Seller agrees to comply with the applicable provisions of any federal, state, or local law or ordinance and all lawful orders, rules, and regulations issued thereunder, as
reasonably requested by Buyer. 

  

	6.	 	All benefits and rewards, risks of loss of ownership and title to the Equipment shall pass to Buyer upon shipment. Seller has satisfied all of it’s obligations to Buyer upon
shipment of described equipment. 

  

	7.	 	This purchase order shall be governed and construed under the laws of the state of California, seller and buyer waive all rights to a jury trial. 

  

	8.	 	This purchase order shall expire sixty (60) days from the date of the purchase order and may be canceled prior thereto by buyer upon written notice from buyer to seller.


  
 Buyer acknowledges, that in the event there are any conflicting
terms between the standard terms and conditions of sale by Seller and those stated above by Buyer, then Sellers terms and conditions prevail. 
  
 In order to expedite payment, reference Purchase Order #         
  
  
  
  

	

	 BILL TO:
 (Buyer)
	 	 	  	 National Technology Leasing Corp.
 126 East
Street
 Auburn, CA 95603
 Phone:        (530) 887-5486
 Facsimile:   (530) 887-8296
	  	 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY LEASING
  
 By:                                      
                                        
                        
 (Authorized Representative)
  
 Date of Purchase
Order:
#### STATE ex rel. Kelly BARNES v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2009-KH-2385.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 17, 2010.

In re Barnes, Kelly; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 08CR399918; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 0513.

Denied. Relator has an adequate remedy on appeal
Order filed April 9 , 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00198

- CV

____________ LAUREN ERICKSON , Appellant

V. KENNETH A. LEPOW, D. D.S., INC. D/B/A LEP OW DENTAL ASSOCIATES, LEPOW FA MILY DENTAL, PLLC, W EST ROAD DENTAL, PLL C, GREATER HOUSTON D ENTAL SOCIETY, KENNETH A. LEPOW, D. D.S., CALVIN JUNG, D .D.S., AND EVAN

MELAMED, D.D.S., Appellee s

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018

- 07441



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this c ase was filed March 8, 2019. To date, the filing fee of $20 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellants are excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed.
See Tex. R. App. P

. 5

. Therefore, the court is sues the following order.Appellant is ordered to pay th e filing fee in the amount of $20 5.00 to the

c lerk of this court on or before April 24, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, th e appeal will be
dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.
No. 86-1151.

#### Frink et al. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Commissioner*v. *Bollinger, ante,*p. 340.
#### Anastasia and Jason EDWARDS, et al. v. The STATE of Louisiana et al.

No. 2011-CC-0019.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Edwards, Anastasia et al.; Edwards, Jason; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. I, No. 2010-00041; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-C-1332.

Granted. *See Burnett v. James Construction Group,*10-2608 (La.7/1/11), 66 So.3d 482, and *Whitley v. State of Louisiana,*11-0040 (La.7/1/11), 66 So.3d 470.
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Docucorp International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John H.
Gray, Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company




/s/   John H. Gray
----------------------------------

John H. Gray
Senior Vice President, Finance and
Administration
(Principal Financial Officer)
October 25, 2002
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-4951

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff ─ Appellee,

v.

ROBERT ANDAWAN BALDWIN,

Defendant ─ Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (1:09-cr-00393-JAB-1)

Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 5, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stacey D. Rubain, QUANDER & RUBAIN, P.A., Winston-Salem, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Graham Tod Green, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Andawan Baldwin pled guilty pursuant to a plea 

agreement to possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, 

21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) (2006), and possession of a 

firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, 18 U.S.C. 

§ 924(c)(1)(A)(i) (2006). Baldwin received the statutory 

minimum sentence of 120 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, 

Baldwin’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting that, in her opinion, 

there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but positing that 

Baldwin should receive a sentence reduction reflecting the 

reduction in the crack to powder cocaine ratio implemented by 

the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (“FSA”), Pub. L. No. 111-220, 

124 Stat. 2372. Although informed of his right to do so, 

Baldwin has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. The 

Government has declined to file a response. We affirm.

In relevant part, the FSA increased the quantity of 

crack cocaine necessary to trigger the mandatory minimum 

sentences set forth in 21 U.S.C. § 841. This court has recently 

concluded that the FSA does not apply retroactively. See United 

States v. Bullard, ___ F.3d ___, __, 2011 WL 1718894, at *9-*11 

(4th Cir. May 6, 2011) (No. 09-5214). Because Baldwin was 

convicted and sentenced before the FSA took effect, he was 

properly sentenced under the version of § 841 then in effect. 
3

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the record 

in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. 

We therefore affirm Baldwin’s convictions and sentence. This 

court requires that counsel inform Baldwin, in writing, of the 

right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for 

further review. If Baldwin requests that a petition be filed, 

but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, 

then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from 

representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof 

was served on Baldwin. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Richard C. BENTLEY v. Bobby FANGUY.

No. 2010-C-2854.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 25, 2011.

In re Fanguy, Robert “Bobby”; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Martin, 16th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 69461; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Nos. 09-822, 09-1509.

Denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.02

              INFORMATION REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

     As previously disclosed in the Company's Form 8-K filed on August 19, 2002,
the Company replaced Arthur Andersen LLP as its independent public accountants
and announced that the Company had appointed Wolf & Company, P.C. as its
independent auditors.

     The Company did not obtain the written consent of Arthur Andersen LLP to
incorporate by reference its report dated February 4, 2002 (except for the
matters discussed in Note 11, as to which the date was February 27, 2002).

     The absence of this consent may limit recovery against Arthur Andersen LLP
under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In addition, as a
practical matter, the ability of Andersen to satisfy any claims (including
claims arising from Arthur Andersen LLP's provision of auditing and other
services to the Company and Arthur Andersen LLP's other clients) may be limited
due to recent events regarding Arthur Andersen LLP, including without limitation
its conviction on federal obstruction of justice charges arising from the
federal government's investigation of Enron Corp.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Colleen B. BrownColleen B. BrownPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 29, 2013

s0422

Order 

April 29, 2013

146548

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146548

COA: 306788

Kent CC: 11-002803-FH

LOUIS WAYNE RANSOM,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 27, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, SEA RAY BOATS, 

INC.,

Appellants

v.

COBALT BOATS, LLC,

Appellee

______________________ 

2017-1065

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015-

01060.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JASON C. WHITE, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellants. Also represented by 

SCOTT D. SHERWIN; WILLIAM R. PETERSON, Houston, TX; 

JULIE S. GOLDEMBERG, Pittsburgh, PA; DAVID M. MORRIS, 

Washington, DC; CHRISTOPER REAGAN LIRO, AARON T.

OLEJNICZAK, Andrus Intellectual Property Law, LLP, 

Milwaukee, WI.
 

 PENNY R. SLICER, Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP, 

Kansas City, MO, argued for appellee. Also represented 

by BRADLEY SCOTT EIDSON, SAMIR RAMESH MEHTA, St. 

Louis, MO.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and TARANTO, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 September 7, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court