alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION
  Dated:
March 2, 2009
    
    /s/
Bruce W. DuncanBruce W. DuncanChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.Dated: March 2, 2009
    
    /s/ Scott A. MusilScott A. MusilChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. The information contained in this written statement shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference to such filing.
EX-10.2 SEO WAIVER






Exhibit 10.2




WAIVER



In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation in the
United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily
waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or
benefits that are required to comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury
as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008.



I acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive
and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called “golden
parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they relate to the
period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the
TARP Capital Purchase Program.



This waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related
to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation a claim
for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by
which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these
regulations on my employment relationship.




	 	 	 
	Date:                                        , 2008
	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 

	 	Signature
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 

	 	Print Name
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 

	 	Title





UST Sequence Number: 75
Exhibit 35.2



LOGO

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

The undersigned, Job Warshaw,
being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any
limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2017 and ending on December 31, 2017 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto)
(the Reporting Period), and of the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and
Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LNR PARTNERS, LLC, a Florida limited liability companyBy

\s\ Job WarshawJob WarshawPresident






1601 Washington Avenue ● Suite 700 ● Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 ● Fax: (305) 695-5601



---

Schedule I

GSMS 2011-GC5

GS
Mortgage Securities Corporation II, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2011-GC5

Citibank,
N.A.,

Global Transaction Services

388 Greenwich Street,
14th Floor

New York, NY 10013

Cirino Emanuele

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall Street

Attention: Commercial Mortgaged Surveillance

New York NY 10004

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

200 West Street

New York NY 10282

Gary Silber

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

200 West Street

New York NY 10282

Leah Nivison

Moodys Investors Service, Inc.

7 World Trade Center

250 Greenwich Street

Attn: Commercial Mortgage Surveillance
Group

New York NY 10007

Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC

220 Gibraltar Road, Suite 300

Attn: CMBS Surveillance

Horsham PA 19044

Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC

1065 Avenue of the Americas, 33rd Floor

New York NY 10018

General Contact

Pentalpha Surveillance LLC

375 N. French Road, Suite 100

Amherst NY 14228

Don Simon
**Exhibit99.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

# In connection with theQuarterly Report of Alternative Resources Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for theperiods covered in the Report.

 

 
| /s/  George  W. Watts               |   | 8/9/02 |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| George W. Watts, Chief Executive Officer |   | Date   |   |
|                                     |   |   |   |
| /s/  Steve  Purcell                 |   | 8/9/02 |   |
| Steve Purcell, Chief Financial Officer   |   | Date   |   |

 

----
<PAGE>



                                  AMENDMENT #1

                                       TO

                         POUGHKEEPSIE SAVINGS BANK, FSB

                      (NOW BANK OF THE HUDSON) NON-EMPLOYEE

                           DIRECTORS' RETIREMENT PLAN

Pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Poughkeepsie Savings Bank, FSB (now Bank of the
Hudson) Non-Employee Directors' Retirement Plan ("Plan"), the Plan is amended as
follows, effective December 19, 1997:

ARTICLE 3 - Section 3.07 is amended by the addition of the following new
paragraph, immediately following the existing paragraph:

     The Plan is terminated on January 31, 1998. Upon the Plan's termination, an
immediate lump sum amount equal to the present value of a participant's benefit
under the Plan shall be payable as soon as administratively possible, to each
Participant and the surviving spouse of each deceased Participant. The lump sum
amount hereunder shall be determined based upon a 7.25% interest rate assumption
and the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality Table.


December 19, 1997
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Cefus Jermore JENKINS.

No. 2011-KO-0857.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Jenkins, Cefus Jermore; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 455682; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KA1471.

Denied.
Exhibit 10.8


 


FIRST AMENDMENT


TO THE


MIVA, INC.


2006 STOCK AWARD AND INCENTIVE PLAN


 


Background Information


 


A.                                   Miva, Inc.
(the “Company”) maintains the Miva, Inc. 2006 Stock Award and Incentive
Plan (the “Plan”).


 


B.                                     The
United States Treasury Department issued final regulations that mandate Plan
amendments with respect to Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.


 


C.                                     The
Company has the power to amend and modify the Plan pursuant to Section 11(e) thereof.


 


D.                                    The
Company desires to amend the Plan to bring the Plan into compliance with
Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.


 


Plan Amendment


 


The amendments set forth below shall be effective January 1, 2009.


 


1.                                       The following
clause is added at the end of the second to last sentence in Section 6(b)(i):


 


“provided that the exercise price will be determined in a manner so as
to avoid (1) converting a Non-409A Award into a 409A Award and (2) causing
a 409A Award to violate the provisions of Code Section 409A.”


 


2.                                       The last
sentence of Section 8(c) is amended in its entirety to read as
follows:


 


“In the case of any 409A Award that is vested and no longer subject to
a risk of forfeiture (within the meaning of Code Section 409A), such Award
will be distributed to the Participant, upon application of the Participant, if
the Participant has had an unforeseeable emergency within the meaning of Code
Sections 409A(a)(2)(A)(vi) and 409A(a)(2)(B)(ii), in accordance with Code Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(ii).”


 


3.                                       The following is
inserted after “to accelerate” and before “distributions relating to 409A
Awards” in the last sentence of Section 11(k):


 


“or defer”


 


4.                                       The remainder of
the Plan shall remain unchanged.


 


[SIGNATURE
BLOCK FOLLOWS ON NEXT PAGE]


 


1

















 


The Company has caused this First Amendment
to the Miva, Inc. 2006 Stock Award and Incentive Plan to be executed on
its behalf, by its officer duly authorized, this 18th day of December, 2008.


 


 


	
   

  	
  Miva, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  /s/ John B.
  Pisaris

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
   

  	
  General
  Counsel and Secretary

  
						



 


2
#### Cory SAINTIL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D10-3289.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 19, 2011.

Cory Saintil, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before, CORTIÑAS, ROTHENBERG, and SALTER, JJ.

*359PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Howard v. State,*642 So.2d 77 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); *See*§§ 775.082(3)(c); 810.02(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005).
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 10, 2010 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
  /s/ UMANG GUPTAUmang GuptaChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 10.3


                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                          BEACON PROPERTIES CORPORATION
                      1994 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN


A. The Beacon Properties Corporation 1994 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the
"Plan"), as adopted and approved by the Board of Directors and shareholders on
March 4, 1994, as subsequently amended by the Board of Directors on February 20,
1996 and approved by the shareholders on May 22, 1996, as subsequently amended
and restated by the Board of Directors on July 25, 1996 to conform to
requirements of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is hereby
amended, subject to shareholders' approval as follows:

         1. Section 3(a) is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence
thereof and substituting therefor the following:

         "The maximum number of shares of Stock reserved and available for
         issuance under the Plan shall be such aggregate number of shares of
         Stock as does not exceed the sum of (i) 4,351,114 shares; plus (ii) as
         of the last business day of each calendar quarter ending after December
         31, 1996, an additional positive number equal to eight percent (8%) of
         the sum of units of partnership interests in Beacon Properties, L.P.
         that are subject to redemption rights ("Units") and shares of Stock
         issued by the Company during that calendar quarter, reduced by any
         shares of Stock issued by the Company during that calendar quarter upon
         the redemption of Units; provided, however, that the maximum number of
         shares of Stock for which Incentive Stock Options may be granted under
         the Plan shall not exceed 4,351,114 shares, reduced by the aggregate
         number of shares subject to outstanding Awards granted under the Plan."

         2. Section 3(a) is further amended by deleting the reference to
"500,000 shares" in the third sentence thereof and substituting therefor
"1,000,000 shares."

         3. Section 5 is hereby amended by deleting the reference to "February
19, 2006" in the third sentence thereof and substituting therefor "January 27,
2007." 

         4. Section 5(b)(i) is hereby amended by deleting the reference to
"3,000 shares" and substituting therefor "5,000 shares."


<PAGE>


         5. Section 5(b)(i) is further amended by adding the following sentence
at the end thereof:

         "The Committee, in its discretion, may grant additional Non-Qualified
         Stock Options to Independent Directors."

B. The effective date of this Amendment shall be January 28, 1997.

C. Except as otherwise amended herein, the Plan is hereby affirmed in all other
respects.


                                        2
News United States Air Force
 FYI: Air Force Astronaut Nomination ProgramPublished Dec. 30, 2015
                        
                        By Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- In this episode of FYI, Tech. Sgt. Holly Roberts-Davis tells us about the Air Force Astronaut Nomination Program for active-duty Air Force members. 
Be sure to check out future episodes of FYI to keep current on policies and changes happening in your Air Force. FYI -- for the stuff you need to know.FYI 



Air Force Astronaut Nomination Program 



space 



NASA 



astronaut
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS BALDELOMAR-VISCARRA;

MARIA CECILIA CISNEROS-CHAVEZ,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-71858

Agency Nos. A098-451-078

 A098-451-079

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 15, 2013** 

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Baldelomar-Viscarra, a native and citizen of Bolivia, and Maria

Cecilia Cisneros-Chavez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petition for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying their motion to reopen

FILED

JAN 17 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-71858

removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Garcia v. Holder, 621

F.3d 906, 912 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for

review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen because the BIA considered the evidence they submitted and acted within

its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant

reopening. See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (the denial of a

motion to reopen shall be reversed if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to

law.”). 

We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioners’ claim that they may qualify for

prosecutorial discretion. See Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder, 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir.

2012) (order).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
**Exhibit 31.1****Rule 13a-14 Certification**I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Cronos Group (the “Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the AuditCommittee of Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report information; and(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:August 10, 2006/s/ DENNIS J. TIETZ
EXHIBIT 24

                               ZMAX CORPORATION
                                  Schedule II
                       Valuation and Qualifying Accounts


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Additions
                                                  Balance at      Charged to
                                                 Beginning of     Costs and                      Balance at
           Description                              Period         Expenses      Deductions     End of Period
           -----------                           ------------     ----------     ----------     -------------
For the year ended December 31, 1998,
<S>                                               <C>           <C>               <C>            <C>   
  Allowance for doubtful accounts..............   $   -         $   17,160        $   -          $   17,160
</TABLE>
#### Robert A. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, DIVISION OF LICENSING, Appellee.

No. 1D11-4363.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 19, 2011.

J. Patrick Buckley, III, of the Law Offices of J. Patrick Buckley, III, Fort Myers, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The notice of appeal failed to timely invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. *See Raysor v. Raysor,*706 So.2d 400, 401 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

DISMISSED.

. DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 of Bay Banks of Virginia, Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Austin L. Roberts, III                                 
|Austin L. Roberts, III President and CEO                   
|                                                           
|/s/ Deborah M. Evans                                       
|Deborah M. Evans, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
|                                                           
|March 23, 2009                                             



59
#### STATE ex rel. Bruce ZIERHUT v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-1695.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Zierhut, Bruce; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 91-4853; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-WR-501.

Denied.