alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.22

           SECOND AMENDMENT TO SERIES A SUBORDINATED CONVERTIBLE NOTE

         THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO SERIES A SUBORDINATED CONVERTIBLE NOTE
("Amendment") is made this 25th day of March 2003, by and between SpaceDev,
Inc., a Colorado corporation (the "Company") and Stuart Schaffer (the "Holder").

                                     PREFACE

         WHEREAS, Holder invested in those certain Series A Subordinated
Convertible Notes of the Company pursuant to a Note Purchase Agreement and
Series A Subordinated Convertible Note (the "Note") dated October 29, 2002 in
the principal amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00); and

         WHEREAS, Holder and the Company desire the extend the repayment period
of the Note by an additional six (6) months as provided in this Amendment;

         NOW THEREFORE, the Note is amended as provided in this Amendment.

                                    ARTICLE I

         Section 1.1 of the Note is stricken in its entirety and amended to read
as follows:

         "1.1 PAYMENT. Subject to the provisions of Section 2 hereof relating to
the conversion of this Note, principal and accrued interest hereof shall be
payable on the twelve-month anniversary hereof (the "MATURITY DATE").

         Payments hereunder shall be made by the Company to the Holder, at the
address as provided to the Company by the Holder in writing, in lawful money of
the United States of America. Interest shall accrue with respect to the unpaid
principal amount of the loan from the date of this Note until such principal is
paid or converted as provided in Section 2 hereof at a rate of 2.03% per annum
(computed on the basis of a 365-day year)."

                                   ARTICLE II

         This Amendment to the Note may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which, when taken together, shall be deemed the fully
executed agreement between the parties.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective
March 25, 2003.

HOLDER                               THE COMPANY

/s/ Stuart E. Schaffer               By: /s/ James W. Benson
-------------------------------         ----------------------------------------
Stuart Schaffer                      James W. Benson, Chief Executive Officer


                                     By: /s/ Richard B. Slansky
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                     Richard B. Slansky, Chief Financial Officer
II 

Calendar No. 305 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1434 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 24, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AUGUST 1, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 896 Pittsburgh Street in Springdale, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Rachel Carson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RACHEL CARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 896 Pittsburgh Street in Spring6 dale, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Rachel Carson Post Office Building’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1434 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Rachel Carson Post 

5 Office Building’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Calendar No. 305 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1434 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Springdale, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Rachel Carson al Service located at 896 Pittsburgh Street in 

AUGUST 1, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 Retired AF general becomes head of women’s defense advisory committeePublished June 16, 2016
                        
                        
                        DOD News, Defense Media Activity
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                 Retired Air Force Gen. Janet C. Wolfenbarger took office June 15 as the chairperson of the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services (DACOWITS), Pentagon officials announced. She succeeds retired Marine Corps Lt. Gen. Frances C. Wilson.Wolfenbarger was commissioned in 1980 as a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy, beginning her career in acquisition as an engineer at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. She became the first woman to achieve four-star general rank in the Air Force, and she retired in 2015.DACOWITS was established in 1951 by then-Defense Secretary George C. Marshall. The committee is composed of civilian women and men who are appointed by the secretary of defense to provide advice and recommendations on matters and policies relating to the recruitment and retention, treatment, employment, integration, and well-being of highly-qualified professional women in the armed forces.Historically, officials said, DACOWITS' recommendations have been instrumental in effecting changes to laws and policies pertaining to military women.DACOWITS members include prominent civilian women and men representing a distribution of demography, academia, industry, public service and other professions, officials noted, adding that selection is on the basis of experience in the military or with women's-related workforce issues.The committee’s 2016 charter authorizes a total of 20 members who are selected for a four-year term without compensation. Members perform a variety of duties, including visiting military installations each year, conducting a review and evaluation of current research on military women, and developing an annual report with recommendations on these issues for service leadership and the secretary of defense.DOD 



women 



committee 



FM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                       5,208,173
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,807,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,015,201
<PP&E>                                           3,169
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              73,818,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       39,158,920
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    13,814,089
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                73,818,387
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               194,579
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,186,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              7,889,017
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   532,629
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .015


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1
 
 Amendment Lessor
  Sixth Amendment Existing Master Lease
    Definitions
 Paris Base Rent Commencement Date
 Initial Paris Base Rent




---



##### 



Certification by Lessee
 Representations and Warranties of Lessee
 Expenses of Lessor
 2




---



##### 



Execution and Counterparts
 Headings
 Enforceability
  3




---



##### 



Signature Page to
 LESSOR:STERLING ACQUISITION CORP.,
a Kentucky corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Daniel J. BoothName:
    
    Daniel J. BoothTitle:
    
    Chief Operating Officer
 STATE OF MARYLAND
    
    
    )COUNTY OF BALTIMORE
    
    
    )
  /s/ Judith A. JacobsNotary Public, Baltimore County, MD
My commission expires: May 12, 2012




---



##### 



Signature Page to
 LESSEE:DIVERSICARE LEASING CORP.,
a Tennessee corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    
    EVP and CFO
 STATE OF TENNESSEE
    
    
    )COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
    
    
    )
 2nd September
 /s/ Jacqueline S. ReedNotary Public, Tenn. County, Williamson
My commission expires: 1/24/2010




---



##### 



Acknowledgment to
 Tenth Amendment
 ADVOCAT, INC. a Delaware corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    
    EVP & CFO
 STATE OF TENNESSEE
    
    
    )COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
    
    
    )
 2nd September
 /s/ Jacqueline S. ReedNotary Public, Tenn. County, Williamson
My Commission Expires: 1/24/2010




---



##### 



Acknowledgment to
 DIVERSICARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES CO.,
a Tennessee corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    
    EVP & CFO
 STATE OF TENNESSEE
    
    
    )COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
    
    
    )
 2nd September
 /s/ Jacqueline S. ReedNotary Public, Tenn. County, Williamson
My Commission Expires: 1/24/2010




---



##### 



Acknowledgment to
 ADVOCAT FINANCE INC.,
a Delaware corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    
    EVP & CFO
 STATE OF TENNESSEE
    
    
    )COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
    
    
    )
 2nd September
 /s/ Jacqueline S. ReedNotary Public, Tenn. County, Williamson
My Commission Expires: 1/24/2010




---



##### 



Acknowledgment to
 STERLING HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT, INC.,
a Kentucky corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    
    EVP & CFO
 STATE OF TENNESSEE
    
    
    )COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
    
    
    )
 2nd September
 /s/ Jacqueline S. ReedNotary Public, Tenn. County, Williamson
My Commission Expires: 1/24/2010




---



##### 



Acknowledgment to
 DIVERSICARE TEXAS I, LLCBy:
    
    /s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    
    EVP & CFODIVERSICARE BALLINGER, LLC
DIVERSICARE DOCTORS, LLC
DIVERSICARE ESTATES, LLC
DIVERSICARE HUMBLE, LLC
DIVERSICARE KATY, LLC
DIVERSICARE NORMANDY TERRACE, LLC
DIVERSICARE TREEMONT, LLC
DIVERSICARE PARIS, LLCBY:
    
    DIVERSICARE TEXAS I, LLC,
its sole memberBy:
    
    /s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    
    EVP & CFO
 STATE OF TENNESSEE
    
    
    )COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
    
    
    )
 2nd September
 /s/ Jacqueline S. ReedNotary Public, Tenn. County, Williamson
My Commission Expires: 1/24/2010
**Exhibit 31.1****Rule 13a-14 Certification**I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Cronos Group (the “Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the AuditCommittee of Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report information; and(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2005/s/ DENNIS J. TIETZ
763 A.2d 354

#### In the Matter of Hardge DAVIS, Jr.

No. 609 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Oct. 19, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 19th day of October, 2000, Hardge Davis, Jr., having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of three months by Order of the Supreme Court of. New Jersey dated May 18, 2000; the said Hardge Davis, Jr., having been directed on August 30, 2000, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is

ORDERED that Hardge Davis, Jr., is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of three months consecutive to the suspension imposed by this Court on March 23, 2000, at No. 561 Disciplinary Docket No. 3, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
#### Bradford S. MATHENY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-2756.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 10, 2011.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 13, 2011.

Bradford S. Matheny, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(4)(A).

DAVIS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
#### KEVIN L. STROBEL *v.*ROSE LI-HWA STROBEL

(AC 22871)

Lavery, C. J., and Dranginis and Flynn, Js.

Submitted on briefs March 21

officially released April 15, 2003

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### In re Matthew C. RAPPOLD.

No. 2011-OB-0846.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 4, 2011.

ON APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR.

PER CURIAM.*

After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude petitioner, Matthew C. Rappold, is immediately eligible to be conditionally admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana, subject to a probationary period of two years. The probationary period shall commence from the date petitioner, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and the probation monitor execute a formal probation plan. During the probationary period, petitioner shall comply with all of the terms and conditions of the consent agreement executed by him with the Louisiana Supreme Court Committee on Bar Admissions, and such other conditions as may be imposed upon him by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel. Should petitioner fail to make a good faith effort to satisfy these conditions, or should he commit any misconduct during the period of probation, his conditional right to practice may be terminated or he may be subjected to other discipline pursuant to the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement.

CONDITIONAL ADMISSION GRANTED.

*

 Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Harry G. Mitchell, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Echo Therapeutics, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.**Date: March 31, 2008**   **/s/ Harry G. Mitchell** **Harry G. Mitchell**  **Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**
#### G., C. & S. F. R’y Co. v. Lewine Bros.

(No. 6527.)

Appeal from McLennan County.

J. W. Terry, counsel for appellant.

L. L. Samuels, counsel for appellees.

Opinion by

Will-son, J.

§ 125. *Evidence; insufficiency of, ground for*reversal. This case was before this court on a former appeal, the judgment of the lower court being then, as now, in favor of appellees. We, on the former appeal, reversed the judgment and remanded the cause, for the reason that the evidence did not warrant the judgment. On this appeal the evidence presented in the record is substantially the same as on the former appeal, and we are still of the opinion that it does not support a judgment for any amount in favor of the appellees. Our views of the evidence were fully stated in the opinion rendered on the former appeal, and it is unnecessary that we should *187restate them. Because the evidence does not warrant the judgment, it is reversed, and the cause is remanded for another trial, with the suggestion to the trial court that, should the evidence on another trial be substantially the same as on- the two former trials, the jury should be directed to return a verdict for the appellant.

June *7,*1890.

Reversed and remanded.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *http://www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: September 20, 2010 . Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10287
Bank of Ellijay
Ellijay
GA
9/17/201010288
Bramble Savings Bank
Milford
OH
9/17/201010289
First Commerce Community Bank
Douglasville
GA
9/17/201010290
ISN Bank
Cherry Hill
NJ
9/17/201010291
Maritime Savings Bank
West Allis
WI
9/17/201010292
The Peoples Bank
Winder
GA
9/17/2010


[FR Doc. 2010-23905 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODEP