alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         350,042
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  136,611
<ALLOWANCES>                                   126,976
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               359,677
<PP&E>                                         166,551
<DEPRECIATION>                                  95,281
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 596,596
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          345,856
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,422,282
<OTHER-SE>                                  (2,200,189)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   596,596
<SALES>                                         90,227
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,315
<CGS>                                           51,851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,192,517
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,155,053)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,155,053)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,155,053)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.24)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23691]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7180]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``On Line: Drawing Through the Twentieth Century''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``On Line: Drawing Through the Twentieth 
Century,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Museum of Modern Art, New York, New York, from on or about November 
21, 2010, until on or about February 7, 2011, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 16, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-23691 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### Jeanette Garnett PICHON, Roland L. Pichon, Mark P. Pichon, Patrice Pichon Robinson, Tracy Pichon Baham, Veronica Pichon Joseph, And Cade Pichon Hagger v. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS, et al.; Bayer Cropscience, Inc. (as Successor of Liability to Rhonepoulenc AG Company f/k/a Amchem Products, Inc., f/k/a Benjamin Foster Company; Seville, Inc. (Formerly, Branton Insulations, Inc.); Continental Insurance Company; et al.

No. 2010-C-2771.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 4, 2011.

In re Baham, Tracy Pichón; Hagger, Cacle Pichón; Joseph, Veronica Pichón; Pichón, Jeanette Garnett et al.; Pichón, Mark P.; Pichón, Roland L.; Robinson, Patrice Pichón; —Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. G, No. 2007-15083; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-0570.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J., would grant.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1572 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1572

 To amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate the discriminatory 
   treatment of the District of Columbia under the provisions of law 
               commonly referred to as the ``Hatch Act''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2007

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate the discriminatory 
   treatment of the District of Columbia under the provisions of law 
               commonly referred to as the ``Hatch Act''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Hatch Act 
Reform Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. EMPLOYEES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TO BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME 
              RESTRICTIONS ON POLITICAL ACTIVITY AS APPLY TO STATE AND 
              LOCAL EMPLOYEES.

    (a) Applicability of Provisions Relating to State and Local 
Employees.--Section 1501(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ``a State or territory'' and inserting ``a State, the 
District of Columbia, or a territory''.
    (b) Provisions Relating to Federal Employees Made Inapplicable.--
Section 7322(1) of such title is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (A);
            (2) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (B);
            (3) by striking subparagraph (C); and
            (4) by striking ``services;'' and inserting ``services or 
        an individual employed or holding office in the government of 
        the District of Columbia;''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the effective 
date of a law enacted by the District of Columbia after the date of the 
enactment of this Act which places restrictions on political activities 
of employees of the District of Columbia government, and shall apply 
with respect to actions occurring on or after that date.
                                 <all>
```
#### John Charles OWEN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 16694.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

April 5, 1960.

*791John Charles Owen, Colton, Cal., in pro. per.

Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lloyd J. Keno, Robert N. Anderson, Lee A. Jackson, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Laughlin E. Waters, U. S. Atty., Edward R. McHale, Lillian W. Stanley, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before POPE and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and KILKENNY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed this action in the district court seeking a money judgment from the United States. His action was dismissed by summary judgment. He sought recovery for money alleged to have been improperly collected as income taxes. He asserts that the income which the Sixteenth Amendment permitted to be taxed was only that portion of appellant’s receipts which remained after deduction of all his personal expenses. Therefore, he says, those portions of the Internal Revenue Code which disallow such deductions are unconstitutional and void.

 When the suit was commenced it developed that appellant had not complied with Sections 7422 and 6532 of the 1954 Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 7422, 6532, relating to filing and dis-allowance of claims for refund. Appellant seeks to avoid the consequences of his failure to satisfy those conditions precedent to suit for refund by asserting that this action is not one for refund under the statute, but rather is a civil action based on the common counts for money had and received. Appellant’s admission that such is the sole basis of his complaint puts him out of court. The United States is not liable in any such action. The sovereign immunity to suit is waived only by express enactment and such waiver is always subject to the statutory conditions.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Welton WALKER v. Cora WALKER, Acme Truck Line, Inc., Zurich North American Insurance, Robert J. Johnson, Jr., Progressive Security Insurance Company and Clearwater Insurance Company.

No. 2011-C-1164.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Walker, Welton; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 118-863; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1865.

Denied.
News United States Air Force
 Ellsworth first CONUS base to run indoor K-9 facilityPublished Jan. 13, 2016
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class James L. Miller
                        
                        
                        28th Bomb Wing Public Affairs
                **ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE, S.D. (AFNS) --**
                Ellsworth Air Force Base became the first Air Force base in the continental U.S. to have an indoor training facility for its four-legged defenders when it became operational last fall.The new facility, located in Dock 32, provides an array of features and amenities for 28th Security Forces Squadron military working dog handlers to train their partners and helps reduce the loss of training time due to austere weather.After seven months of planning and approval, a $100,000 contract was awarded to a local business to complete the renovations that included removing aircraft parts and installing turf, barriers and obstacles to transform the aircraft hangar into a training facility for military working dogs.Tech. Sgt. Abraham Wheeler, a 28th SFS kennel master, said the new facility provides MWDs and their handlers the ability to train year-round, regardless of weather conditions."Being at Ellsworth, there is a good chance we can be covered in snow for five months out of the year," Wheeler said. "The indoor facility allows us to train every day of the year -- rain, snow or shine."He added that the new facility allows teams to train on a variety of topics ranging from basic obedience training to realistic patrol scenarios."The facility minimizes training time lost due to inclement weather," said Wheeler, who has been a handler for eight years. "It also gives an isolated area for the dogs to work on issues they may have with minimum distractions."While the new facility may be slightly smaller than the outdoor area, it still includes the obstacle course, patrol work field and detection training environments."My favorite part is how versatile it is," Wheeler said. "We can do so many things and not worry about hurting one of the dogs due to cold weather."Wheeler said he hopes other bases will follow suit, especially northern bases, where freezing temperatures and fierce winds hinder training.Enclosed and heated, the facility also helps the dogs stay healthy and train in a safe environment, Wheeler said."We are extremely grateful to be the first base to have an indoor military working dog training facility," he continued. "(The ability to train inside) benefits the dogs, handlers, and most importantly, the Air Force."MWD 



Ellsworth AFB 



AFGSC 



military working dog 



K-9
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 of Bay Banks of Virginia, Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Austin L. Roberts, III                                 
|Austin L. Roberts, III President and CEO                   
|                                                           
|/s/ Deborah M. Evans                                       
|Deborah M. Evans, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer

March 22, 2006



53
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1


I, NORMAN E. DRAPEAU, JR., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MRO Software, Inc., a
Massachusetts Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:    August 14, 2003

By: /s/ Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.
---------------------------------
Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.1

Certifications

I, J.A. Cardwell, Sr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Petro Stopping Centers, L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006               
|                                    
|/s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.              
|(J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)                
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


Certification
      Pursuant


to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
      Adopted Pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Cenveo, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the ‘‘Company’’),
      does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge,
      that:




The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine month periods ended
      September 30, 2007 (the ‘‘Form 10-Q’’) of the Company fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Date:
      November 8, 2007


/s/
      ROBERTG.BURTON,
      SR.


Robert
      G. Burton, Sr.


Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer





Date:
      November 8, 2007


/s/
      MARK
      S. HILTWEIN


Mark
      S. Hiltwein


Chief
      Financial Officer







A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Cenveo, Inc. and will be retained
      by Cenveo, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
      63
      of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
      10-Q
      or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      I, Paul DePond,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report of Notify Technology Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
September  30, 2007 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly  presents in all material  respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Notify Technology Corporation.

      Date: December 19, 2007


                                           By:    /s/ Paul F. DePond
                                                  ------------------------------
                                           Name:  Paul F. DePond
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer


      I, Gerald W. Rice, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report of Notify Technology Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
September  30, 2007 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly  presents in all material  respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Notify Technology Corporation.

      Date: December 19, 2007


                                           By:    /s/ Gerald W. Rice
                                                  ------------------------------
                                           Name:  Gerald W. Rice
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Notify  Technology  Corporation  and will be  retained  by  Notify
Technology  Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.