alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Commercial Credit Company of Georgia *v.*Johnson, sheriff.

Hill, J.

Section 20 of the act of 1917 (Acts Ex. Sess. 1917, pp. 7, 16), providing for condemnation of vehicles and conveyances of all kinds, which are used on any of the public roads or private ways of this State, declares that such vehicles and conveyances being so used “shall be seized by any sheriff or other arresting officer, who shall report the same to the solicitor of the county, city, or superior court having jurisdiction in .the county where the seizure was made.” The act further provides’for proceedings by petition to the court to be instituted within ten days and for service of a copy of the petition upon “the owner or lessee if known, and, if the owner or lessee is unknown,” for service of notice by publication, and that if no defense is filed within thirty days judgment by default may be entered at chambers, but if a defense is filed “the case shall proceed as other civil cases in said court.” The statute further provides that should it appear upon the trial of the case that the vehicle or conveyance was so used “with the knowledge or *317consent- of the owner or lessee, the same shall be sold by order of the court after such advertisement as the court may direct.” The statute does not contain any provision authorizing the owner or lessee of the vehicle or conveyance seized under the provisions of the statute to replevy and take possession of the property by giving a bond of any description to the sheriff after the property has been seized. *Held:*

No. 6134.

May 16, 1928.

Petition for mandamus. Before Judge Hutcheson. Newton superior court. June 28, 1927.

*William T. Dean*and *William G. Henson,*for plaintiff.

*Reuben M. Tuclc*and *Eric Long,*for defendant.

1. Where a sheriff seizes an automobile which was being used in the transportation of intoxicating liquors, and proceedings are instituted for its condemnation, under the provisions of the foregoing statute, there is no provision of law for an owner or lessee of the property to replevy and take possession of the same by giving a bond of any description; and the sheriff is not under any legal duty to surrender the automobile to a person who intervenes as an owner in condemnation proceedings and tenders a replevy bond for the forthcoming of the property.

2. The judge did not err in refusing the intervenor’s application for a writ of mandamus against the sheriff, to require him to accept a replevy bond. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5696]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

EDUCATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS BRIGHTEN WITH PRESIDENT'S VETO OF 
                            RESCISSIONS BILL

  (Mrs. MALONEY asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mrs. MALONEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise this morning to commend President 
Clinton for vetoing a bill that took food out of the mouths of 
children, heat out of the homes of the elderly, and trees out of 
national forests.
  The bill cut student loans and summer jobs for young Americans trying 
to do something with their lives. It used money for those programs to 
provide timber barons with massive Government subsidies. This is a 
clear-cut case of clearcutting.
  The new majority has taken a chain saw to education funding and to 
our disappearing natural resources. But the President's pen was 
mightier than the chain saw.
  His first veto was a defining one. He stuck up for education and the 
environment.
  The Republicans stuck up for corporate welfare and environmental 
destruction.
  Mr. Speaker, the new majority has passed some awful legislation. I 
hope the President's veto pen has plenty of ink.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1425 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1425

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 4551 East 52nd Street in Odessa, Texas, as the ``Staff Sergeant Marvin 
                   `Rex' Young Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT MARVIN ``REX'' YOUNG POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4551 East 52nd Street in Odessa, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Marvin `Rex' Young Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Marvin `Rex' Young Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
VII 

Private Calendar No. 1 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1485 

[Report No. 110–741] 

For the relief of Esther Karinge. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2007 

Mr. MARKEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

JULY 8, 2008 

Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

For the relief of Esther Karinge. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ESTHER 

4 KARINGE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Esther Karinge shall be eligible for issuance of an 

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1485 RH

1 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil2 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

3 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to 

4 lawful permanent resident. 

5 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Esther Karinge 

6 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci7 fied in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have en8 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, 

9 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of 

10 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 

11 enactment of this Act. 

12 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

13 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap14 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica15 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

16 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

17 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

18 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res19 idence to Esther Karinge, the Secretary of State shall in20 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

21 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi22 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun23 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi24 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

25 number of immigrant visas that are made available to namstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HR 1485 RH

1 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

2 202(e) of such Act. 

3 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

4 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

5 parents, brothers, and sisters of Esther Karinge shall not, 

6 by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi7 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

Private Calendar No. 1 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1485 

[Report No. 110

–741] 

A BILL 

For the relief of Esther Karinge. 

JULY 8, 2008 

Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DSI TOYS,
INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE ELEVEN MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         478,970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,405,587
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,997,528)
<INVENTORY>                                  5,695,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,837,413
<PP&E>                                       6,787,848
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,787,633
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,027,365
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,511,800
<BONDS>                                      2,393,236
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,190
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,901,799
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,027,365
<SALES>                                     47,560,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,560,024
<CGS>                                       34,046,112
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,848,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               103,302
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                65,528
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             618,994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,149,596
<INCOME-TAX>                                   868,605
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,280,991
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,280,991
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB of OmniComm Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, being, Ronald T. Linares, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Ronald T. Linares
------------------------------------------
Ronald T. Linares
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

April 15, 2003
#### Jones & Casey v. Cunningham & Son.

(No. 3195.)

October 26, 1889.

Appeal from Tarrant County.

J. M. O’Neill and E. T. Willing, counsel for appellants.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 6, *Order not accepted by drawee and not drawn upon a particular fund in his hands does not operate as an assignment of any fund in his hands.*Appellees sued appellants upon two orders alleged to have been drawn by one Eex upon appellants, and accepted by them. Appellees recovered judgment for amounts named in *the*orders and for costs. It was not proved, as alleged, that appellants had accepted said orders; on the contrary, it was shown that they had declined to accept the same. Said orders were not drawn upon any particular fund or debt, and did not therefore operate as a transfer or assignment of any fund which might have been in the hands of appellants belonging to Eex. [Harris Co. v. Campbell, 68 Tex. 28; 1 Daniel, Neg. Inst., § 23.] Nor was it proved that appellants had in their hands any fund subject to said orders, or that they were indóbted to said Eex. We think the evidence fails to show any liability whatever on the part of appellants.

Eeversed and remanded.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry
J. White, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Dated:  March 31, 2003                                  /s/ HARRY J. WHITE, JR.
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Harry J. White, Jr.



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. and will be retained by Silverleaf
Resorts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 35.3

Agency & Trust

388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor

New York, NY 10013

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE



LOGO

I, Karen Montbach, a Managing Director of Citibank, N. A. (the Company), hereby certify, with respect to
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2011 between GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer,
Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee (the Agreement), the following:

1. A review of the Companys activities as Certificate Administrator for the period ending December 31, 2012 and its performance
under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for
the period ending December 31, 2012, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigneds individual capacity.

Date: March 11, 2013



Citibank, N.A.By:

/s/ Karen MontbachName:

Karen MontbachTitle:

Managing Director
578 A.2d 1228

#### IN THE MATTER OF PETER A. BUXBAUM, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 14, 1990.

ORDER

PETER A. BUXBAUM of MERCHANTVILLE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PETER A. BUXBAUM is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.
News United States Air Force
 Carter takes office as 25th Defense secretaryPublished Feb. 17, 2015
                        
                        By Cheryl Pellerin
                        
                        
                        DoD News, Defense Media Activity
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Ash Carter became the 25th secretary of Defense Feb. 17, after having served previously as deputy defense secretary, defense acquisition chief and assistant secretary for global strategic affairs.
President Barack Obama nominated Carter for the position -- calling Carter an innovator and a reformer who knows the Defense Department inside and out –- the president said, “On day one, he’s going to hit the ground running.”
At his Feb. 4 Senate Armed Services Committee confirmation hearing, Carter described the work that lies ahead for him and the department.
“I think we are in a time,” he told the Senate panel, “where the number and severity of risks is something I've not seen before in my life.”
For Carter, the job will include dealing with coalition responsibilities in Afghanistan and Iraq, and what he described as “the malignant and savage terrorism” emanating from turmoil in the Middle East and North Africa.
He’ll also take on what has become a reversion to what he’s called old-style security thinking in parts of Europe, long-standing tensions and rapid changes in Asia, a continuing imperative to counter the spread of weapons of mass destruction, and dangers in new domains such as cyber.
Carter’s own expertise, experience, travels and interests in defense and national security have prepared him precisely to deal with these challenges and more.
As former Sen. Joe Lieberman said in introductory remarks during Carter’s hearing, “It would really be hard to find someone to serve as secretary of Defense who combines as much practical Pentagon experience with so deep a background in national security policy as Ash Carter.”defense secretary 



Ash Carter 



DOD 



SecDEF Related Links
        Carter’s message to DOD workforce
                                Feb. 17, 2015
                                Ash Carter, who was sworn in as the 25th secretary of Defense Feb. 17, laid out his top priorities in a message to the Defense Department workforce.
News United States Air Force
 Eglin activates F-35 Partner Support ComplexPublished May 12, 2016
                        
                        By 1st Lt Amanda Farr
                        
                        
                        53rd Wing Public Affairs
                **EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                The 53rd Wing activated on May 11 the F-35 Partner Support Complex, a U.S.-owned facility here that handles F-35 Lightning II testing.Robert Kraus assumed the new position as the complex’s director, making it the first civilian-led unit in the wing. Kraus, a retired lieutenant colonel, served as the 68th Electronic Warfare Squadron commander and 53rd Electronic Warfare Group deputy commander at Eglin Air Force Base prior to this new position.The F-35 PSC is charged with providing mission data, intelligence support, lab facilities and training to the eight partner countries purchasing the fifth-generation aircraft."The growth of the PSC will relieve that pressure, as well as ensure our coalition partners are ready to participate in any future operations," Kraus said.The partner countries include: Australia, Canada, Denmark, Italy, Norway, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Turkey. These countries provided critical design input and funding during the early stages of the F-35 program, which differs from foreign military sales customers."The PSC will directly support the partners, who currently have no indigenous capability to create mission data for the F-35," Kraus said.The complex will interact with mission data programmers and data analysts from the partner nations. According to Kraus, one of the key projects for the unit is to support the partners in the creation of two separate hardware in the loop testing facilities -- only one currently exists.The F-35 PSC started as a small team within the 513th Electronic Warfare Squadron at Eglin AFB, which provides F-35 mission data files to the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps. The team staffs 24 civilian employees and contractors, with plans to grow to about 100 personnel. The new unit will report to the 53rd EWG.While the mission of the complex has been ongoing for nearly five years, Kraus sees the formalization of the unit as a step forward."The formal activation of the unit will give me a greater ability to support the partners in their efforts," he said. "(I can now) elevate the partner support functions to an equal level with U.S. squadrons, as opposed to a subordinate role."Plans are in the works for two separate buildings to hold the new unit and partner nation personnel. This includes the Australia/Canada/United Kingdom Reprogramming Laboratory building and the Norway/Italy Reprogramming Laboratory building. Additional support will be provided to Denmark, the Netherlands and Turkey.F-35 



testing 



Eglin AFB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S 10-Q FOR THE THREE
MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             657
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,593
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,708
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,146
<PP&E>                                          30,420
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,783
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           160
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,784
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,905
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    90
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,478
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,842
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,636
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,636
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>