alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 1425 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4551 East 

52nd Street in Odessa, Texas, as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Marvin ‘Rex’ Young Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT MARVIN ‘‘REX’’ YOUNG POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 4551 East 52nd Street in Odessa, Texas, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Marvin ‘Rex’ Young 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Marvin ‘Rex’ Young Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Board of Directors and ShareholdersOttawa Financial CorporationHolland, Michigan

We have reviewed, in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified PublicAccountants, the unaudited interim financial information of Ottawa Financial Corporation as of and for the periodsended September 30, 2000 and 1999 as indicated in our report dated October 16, 2000.  Because we did not performan audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, which wasincluded in your quarterly report on Form 10-Q, is being incorporated by reference in Registration Statements (FileNos. 333-1350, 333-4242 and 333-79843) on Form S-8 and in the Registration Statement (File No. 333-4950) on FormS-3.

We also are aware that our report referred to above, under Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is notconsidered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certifiedby an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

                                                                                  Crowe, Chizekand Company LLP

Grand Rapids, MichiganOctober 16, 2000
EXHIBIT
4-ddd

    CERTIFICATE
OF TRUST

    OF

    MORGAN
STANLEY CAPITAL TRUST XIII

     

    THIS
CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of Morgan Stanley Capital Trust XIII (the “Issuer Trust”),
dated as of December 12, 2008, is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a statutory trust under Chapter 38 of Title 12
of the Delaware Code (12 Del. C. § 3801, et seq.)(the
"Act").

     

    1.           Name.  The
name of the statutory trust being formed hereby is Morgan Stanley Capital Trust
XIII.

     

    2.           Delaware
Trustee.  The name and business address of the trustee of the
Issuer Trust with its principal place of business in the State of Delaware is
BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware, White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware
19711.

     

    3.           Effective
Date.  This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing
with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

     

    IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Issuer Trust, have executed
this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act as of
the date first written above.

     

    
      	
              BNY
      MELLON TRUST OF DELAWARE, 

              not
      in its individual capacity, 

              but
      solely as Delaware Trustee

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              By:

            	
              /s/ Kristine K. Gullo

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Name:

            	
              Kristine
      K. Gullo

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Title:

            	
              Vice
      President

            	 
      
	 	 
	 	 
	
              THE
      BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, 

              not
      in its individual capacity, 

              but
      solely as Property Trustee

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              By:

            	
              /s/ Franca M. Ferrera

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Name:

            	
              Franca
      M. Ferrera

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Title:

            	
              Assistant
      Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HAGLER
 BAILLY, INC. UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
  ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         5,261
<SECURITIES>                                   6,551
<RECEIVABLES>                                  55,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,873
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               68,038
<PP&E>                                         16,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 84,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          33,916
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       155
<OTHER-SE>                                     48,694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   84,657
<SALES>                                        160,615
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,615
<CGS>                                          120,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,234
<INCOME-TAX>                                   5,460
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,226)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                2,366
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,890)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
Order filed June 18, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00513-CV

____________

BENEDICT EMESOWUM, Appellant

V.

CHRISTMAS EVE MORGAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1061501

ORDER

According to information provided to this court, appellant is attempting to 

appeal the trial court’s order sustaining the contest to his affidavit of indigence. 

Our records do not reflect that appellant is attempting to appeal from a final, 

appealable order.

The clerk’s record has not been filed in this appeal. To determine our 

jurisdiction over this appeal, and if jurisdiction exists, whether appellant is entitled 
to proceed without the advance payment of costs, we issue the following order for 

a partial clerk’s record.

We order the Harris County Clerk to file a partial clerk’s record with the 

clerk of this court on or before July 9, 2015. In order that this court may ascertain 

its jurisdiction over the appeal, the partial clerk’s record shall contain (1) the 

judgment being appealed; (2) any motion for new trial, other post-judgment 

motion, or request for findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (3) the notice of 

appeal. In addition, the partial clerk’s record shall contain: (4) appellant’s 

affidavit of indigence; (5) the contest(s) to the affidavit of indigence, if any; (6) the 

trial court’s order ruling on any contest; (7) any other documents pertaining to the 

claim of indigence and the contests thereto. 

PER CURIAM
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 145 

To amend section 1369 of title 18, United States Code, to extend Federal 

jurisdiction over destruction of veterans’ memorials on State or local 

government property. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 1369 of title 18, United States Code, 

to extend Federal jurisdiction over destruction of veterans’ memorials on State or local government property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect our Veterans 

5 Memorials Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that— 

8 (1) crimes against United States military vet9 erans’ memorials on public property dishonor all 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 145 IH

1 American servicemen and women and their sacrifices 

2 for the Nation’s defense; and 

3 (2) Federal prosecution of crimes against such 

4 veterans’ memorials on public property is in the na5 tional interest of honoring the Nation’s military vet6 erans. 

7 SEC. 3. FEDERAL JURISDICTION OVER DESTRUCTION OF 

8 VETERANS’ MEMORIALS ON STATE OR LOCAL 

9 GOVERNMENT PROPERTY. 

10 Section 1369(b)(2) of title 18, United States Code, 

11 is amended by inserting ‘‘, or a State or local government’’ 

12 after ‘‘Federal Government’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.46


 


AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT
TO LICENSE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of the 19th day of December,
2008, by and between Artann Laboratories, Inc. (“Artann”), a
New Jersey corporation and ProUroCare Medical, Inc. (“ProUroCare”), a
Nevada corporation.


 


RECITALS


 


A.                                   Artann
and ProUroCare entered into a license agreement on July 25, 2008 relating
to a prostate mechanical imaging system (“the License Agreement”).


 


B.                                     The
parties now wish to amend the License Agreement as provided herein.


 


Now,
therefore, in consideration of the covenants and agreements set forth herein
and for valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties mutually agree as follows:


 


AGREEMENT


 


ARTICLE I


DEFINITIONS


 


Terms used in
this Amendment but not defined or redefined in this Amendment have the meanings
ascribed thereto in the License Agreement.


 


ARTICLE II


AMENDMENTS


 


2.1                                 Effective Date.  The definition of “Effective Date” set forth
in Section 1.1 of the License Agreement shall be amended and restated to
read in its entirety as follows:


 


“Effective
Date” means December 23, 2008.


 


2.2                                 Artann.  The reference to Artann as being a Delaware
corporation in the introductory paragraph of the License Agreement shall be
corrected to refer to Artann as a New Jersey corporation.


 


2.3                                 Payees.  A new Section 3.11 of the License
Agreement shall be added which shall read in its entirety as follows:


 


3.11 Payees.  It is understood that Armen Sarvazyan (“Sarvazyan”)
and Vladamir Egorov (“Egorov”) were significantly involved in development
activities associated with the PMI System. 
Artann desires that a portion of the payments due it under this Article 3
be made to Sarvazyan and another portion be made to Egorov with 


 


1

















 


the remainder
being made to Artann.  ProUroCare hereby
agrees to make and shall make each and any such payment due Artann under this Article 3
to Sarvazyan, Egorov and Artann in the percentages specified and directed by
Artann pursuant a notice provided pursuant to Section 7.9; provided,
however, that the total amount of each such payment to be made by ProUroCare
shall remain unchanged.


 


IN WITNESS
THEREOF, the parties, intending to be legally bound, have caused this Amendment
to be executed by their duly authorized officers, as of the effective date of
this Amendment.


 


	
  PROUROCARE
  MEDICAL, INC.

  	
  ARTANN
  LABORATORIES, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Richard Carlson

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Noune Sarvazyan

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  (Print or
  Type Name)

  	
  (Print or
  Type Name)

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  CEO

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  CEO

  
									



 


2
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements pertaining to the employee stock option plans of United Microelectronics
Corporation:



|1. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-102605) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan,
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-126889) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan and the 2004 Employee Stock Option Plan, and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-142809) pertaining to the 2004 Employee Stock Option Plan and 2005 Employee Stock Option Plan
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated April 18, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of United Microelectronics Corporation and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting of United Microelectronics Corporation, included in its Annual Report (Form 20-F) of United Microelectronics Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2013.

/s/Ernst & Young

Ernst &
Young

Taipei, Taiwan,

Republic
of China

April 18, 2014



1
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Steven L.Muellner, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Meade Instruments Corp.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)     disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting

Date: August29, 2007
| By:                  | /s/ STEVEN L. MUELLNER |   |
|----------------------|------------------------|--------|
| *President  and CEO* |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                       SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
               CALCULATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                        YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                       2001          2000         1999          1998         1997
                                                                     --------      --------      -------      --------      -------
<S>                                                                  <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>           <C>
Income before extraordinary items                                    $ 77,316      $ 86,814      $59,760      $ 66,475      $31,934
Interest:
    Expense incurred                                                   39,854        38,649       37,282        32,550       20,902
    Amortization of deferred financing costs                            1,404         1,072          992           956        1,057
    Rental fixed charges                                                  291           280          159           133          115
                                                                     --------      --------      -------      --------      -------
    Total                                                            $118,865      $126,815      $98,193      $100,114      $54,008
                                                                     ========      ========      =======      ========      =======

Fixed charges:
    Interest expense                                                 $ 39,854      $ 38,649      $37,282      $ 32,550      $20,902
    Interest capitalized                                               11,080        11,117        7,888         6,143        5,876
    Dividends to preferred unitholders in operating partnership        12,420        12,420        6,698            --           --
    Rental fixed charges                                                  291           280          159           133          115
    Amortization of deferred financing costs                            1,404         1,072          992           956        1,057
                                                                     --------      --------      -------      --------      -------
      Total                                                          $ 65,049      $ 63,538      $53,019      $ 39,782      $27,950
                                                                     ========      ========      =======      ========      =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                       1.83          1.99         1.85          2.52         1.93
                                                                     ========      ========      =======      ========      =======
</TABLE>
#### G., C. & S. F. R’y Co. v. J. W. Odom.

(No. 6421.)

Appeal from Runnels County.

J. W. Terry, counsel for appellant.

Powell & Smith, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Hurt, J..

§ 106. *Certiorari; petition for must purport to set out all the evidence in the trial court.*This suit was instituted in the justice’s court to recover $150 as damages to twenty-three head of beef cattle shipped by appellee from Ballinger, Tex., to Chicago, 111. There was a judgment in said court for $150, and the case was removed to the county court by *certiorari.*At the first term of the county court appellee filed a motion in due order of pleading to dismiss the *certiorari*because of the insufficiency of the petition therefor. The motion was overruled, and appellee excepted. Upon trial in the county court, the appellee again recovered judgment for $150, and the company appeals to this court, assigning errors. Odom, appellee, filed cross-assignment of errors, based upon the action of the court in overruling his motion to dismiss the *certiorari.*The assignment is that the court erred in overruling the motion to dismiss, in this: (1) Because defendant’s petition for said writ neither sets out nor purports to set out all the evidence received on the trial of said cause in the justice’s court; (2) because said petition does not allege or show sufficient merit to entitle the defendant to said writ. The petition fails to allege, directly or circumstantially, the facts that were in evidence on the trial in the justice’s court. It does not purport to set out all the facts, but contains some facts, with several inferences. The writ of *certiorari*is not granted as a matter of right. The application for it is .addressed to the discretionary power of the court, and should show that the applicant has rights; or a valid de*164fense of which he has been deprived by the erroneous action of the inferior court; or that,-without fault or want of diligence on his part, he has been unable to pre- . sent his rights or defenses. Applying these rules to the petition in this case, it will be found defective in the particulars specified in appellee’s assignment of errors. There is no direct or circumstantial allegation that the evidence or facts therein stated are all the facts proved on the trial below. We are of opinion that the motion to dismiss the *certiorari*should have been sustained. The judgment of the court below is reversed, and the writ of *certiorari*ordered dismissed.

May 7, 1890.

Beversed and dismissed.