alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, NORMAN E. DRAPEAU, JR., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MRO Software, Inc., a
Massachusetts Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February 9, 2005


By: /s/ Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.
----------------------------------------
Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Robert W. Winston IIIName:
    
    Robert W. Winston, IIITitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    November 9, 2005
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5236]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   REPUBLICANS OFFER HISTORIC PLAN TO BALANCE OUT-OF-CONTROL FEDERAL 
                                 BUDGET

  (Mrs. SEASTRAND asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Mrs. SEASTRAND. Mr. Speaker, our liberal friends are tragically on 
the wrong side of history. Their time has come and gone. Their ideas 
have been clearly refuted with evidence, their representatives defeated 
at the polls. For those that remain in this House, there cannot be much 
to motivate them as we move to smaller, less costly Government.
  Clearly, the promise of big Government has crumbled and given way to 
a total reassessment of the Federal Government.
  Something else is just as clear--the need to balance the budget.
  Republicans have offered a historic plan to balance the out-of-
control Federal budget. I can think of few things more important to our 
future and the future of our children than to balance the budget. We 
will return power to families and local governments as we shift the 
focus of governing away from Washington.
  Republicans believe in the ability of the individual and of families 
to make the right choices, instead of big Government.
  This philosophy places us against status quo liberalism here in 
Washington, but squarely on the side of the American people.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.and Subsidiaries**

**Section 1350 Certifications**

 

The undersigned, Thomas J Fitzmyers and KarenColonias, being the duly elected and acting Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer, respectively, of Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc., aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that Amendment No. 1 to thequarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly periodended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information containedin such Amendment No. 1 fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | January 8, 2010 |                     | /s/Thomas J Fitzmyers |
|--------|-----------------|--------------------------|-----------------------|
|   |            | Thomas J Fitzmyers       |
|   |            | Chief Executive Officer  |
|   |            |                     |
|   |            |                     |
|   |            | /s/Karen Colonias        |
|   |            | Karen Colonias           |
|   |            | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

*A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 ofthe United States Code has been provided to Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.and will be retained by Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.*

 

----
#### Western Union Telegraph Co. v. David Goslin.

(No. 2229.)

Appeal from Dallas County.

*(Transferred from Austin. J*

¿Stemmons & Field, counsel for appellant.

E. E. Cowart, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 220. *Telegraph company; reasonable stipulations in contract by; sender of message must take notice of such stipulations; case stated.*Appellee sued appellant and recovered damages for an error made in the transmission of an unrepeated night message. The message was an order for *one dozen*lamps. The operator transmitted it *four dozen*lamps. There was a stipulation in the contract under which the message was transmitted, that no claim for damages should be valid unless presented in writing within thirty days after' sending the message. This stipulation was not complied with by appellee. *Held:*Telegraph companies can, by express contract, or by proper rules and regulations contained in printed notices or otherwise, and brought to the notice of those with whom they deal, under such circumstances as to create an implied contract’, limit their liability for delays and errors in transmitting and delivering messages, except ■when caused by the misconduct, fraud, or want of due *267care, on the part of the company, its servants or agents. [Womack v. W. U. Tel. Co. 58 Tex. 116; Neill v. W. U. Tel. Co. 57 Tex. 283; W. U. Tel. Co. v. Edsall, 63 Tex. 668; W. & W. Con. Rep. § 268.] Astipulation in a contract between the sender of the message and the company, such as the one above quoted, violates no rule of public policy, and is reasonable, valid and obligatory. *[Ante,*§ 62; 2 W. Con. Rep. § 44; W. U. Tel. Co. v. Rains, 63 Tex. 27.]

December 11, 1886.

§ 221. *Waiver of claim for damages; express and implied tvaiver; rules as to.*Appellee contends that the requirement of a written claim for damages within thirty days after the sending of the message was waived by appellant. That such a stipulation can be waived is unquestionable. [R’y Co. v. Underwood, 62 Tex. 21; 2 W. Con. Rep. § 44.] There was certainly no express waiver made. An implied waiver can only be held binding when it is made *after*the time specified has elapsed, when such a waiver is clearly shown by the evidence. Such a waiver must be unequivocal, direct and positive, and no such waiver is shown by the evidence. Appellee showed no valid cause of action against appellant, and the judgment is reversed and rendered for appellant.

Eeversed and rendered.
Exhibit 32

                       CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Horizon Financial
Services Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert W. DeCook, Chief Executive Officer and, I, Vicki Hladik,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By: /S/ ROBERT W. DECOOK                                 By: /S/ VICKI HLADIK
------------------------                                 -----------------------
Name: Robert W. DeCook                                        Name: Vicki Hladik
Chief Executive Officer                                  Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2004                                                        May 13, 2004


                                      -22-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          18,304
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                       405
<INVENTORY>                                     14,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,205
<PP&E>                                         190,733
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,599
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,042
<BONDS>                                              0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           19,891
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (19,814)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,584
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               162,565
<CGS>                                          131,646
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  151,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,983
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,070
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,390)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,390)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 12,745
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,135)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CURRENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR
ACCOMPANYING NOTES THERETO.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,**

**Petitioner**

**v. ROBERT TOLAND, II,**  **Respondent :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **No. 1507 Disciplinary Docket No. 3**

**104 DB 2009 Attorney Registration No.**  **57360 (Chester County)** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 20 th**  **day of November, 2014, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Discip**  **linary Board dated September 3, 2014, the Joint Petition in Support of**  **Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant to Rule 215(g), Pa.R.D.E., and it i**  **s ORDERED that Robert Toland, II, is suspended on consent**  **from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years retroactive**  **to November 30, 2007, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.**  **D.E.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,526
<SECURITIES>                                     6,380
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,127
<ALLOWANCES>                                       516
<INVENTORY>                                     11,263
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,519
<PP&E>                                           6,013
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,762
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,139
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,381
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,678
<SALES>                                         10,731
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,731
<CGS>                                            8,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,386
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   516
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  39
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (958)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (958)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (958)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
761 A.2d 545

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Harley D. CLEMENT, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued Sept. 11, 2000.

Decided Nov. 27, 2000.

Lawrence J. Casella, Pittsburgh, for H. Clement.

Gerald J. Pappert, John G. Knorr, Harrisburg, for Com. of Pennsylvania.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of November, 2000, the order of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. *Erie v. Pap’s A.M. t/d/b/a/ Kandyland,*529 U.S. 277, 120 S.Ct. 1382, 146 L.Ed.2d 265 (2000).

Justice NEWMAN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1468 

To ensure that, for each small business participating in the 8(a) business 

development program that was affected by Hurricane Katrina of 2005, 

the period in which it can participate is extended by 18 months. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2007 

Mr. JEFFERSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To ensure that, for each small business participating in the 

8(a) business development program that was affected 

by Hurricane Katrina of 2005, the period in which it 

can participate is extended by 18 months. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disadvantaged Busi5 ness Disaster Eligibility Act’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1468 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AVAILABILITY OF DISASTER LOANS 

2 FOR VICTIMS OF HURRICANE KATRINA. 

3 (a) RETROACTIVITY.—If a small business concern, 

4 while participating in any program or activity under the 

5 authority of paragraph (10) of section 7(j) of the Small 

6 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(j)), was located in a parish 

7 described in subsection (b) and was affected by Hurricane 

8 Katrina of 2005, the period during which the small busi9 ness concern is permitted continuing participation and eli10 gibility in such program or activity shall be extended for 

11 an additional 18 months. 

12 (b) PARISHES COVERED.—Subsection (a) applies to 

13 any parish in the State of Louisiana that has been des14 ignated by the Administrator of the Small Business Ad15 ministration as a disaster area by reason of Hurricane 

16 Katrina under disaster declaration 10176 or 10177. 

17 (c) REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE.—The Administrator 

18 of the Small Business Administration shall ensure that the 

19 case of every small business concern participating before 

20 the date of the enactment of this Act in a program or 

21 activity covered by subsection (a) is reviewed and brought 

22 into compliance with this section. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
#### Deborah M. MELTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-2093.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2000.

Decided Jan. 8, 2001.

*138Deborah M. Melton, pro se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Allen F. Loucks, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

Before MICHAEL and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Deborah M. Melton appeals the district court’s order granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment in Melton’s civil action in which she alleged claims of discrimination in her employment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Melton v. Shalala,*No. CA-98-2598-MJG (D. Md. June 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NorthWest Indiana Bancorp (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of David A. Bochnowski, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert T. Lowry, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   April 26, 2011
/s/ David A. BochnowskiDavid A. BochnowskiChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Robert T. LowryRobert T. LowrySenior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Treasurer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to NorthWest Indiana Bancorp and will be retained by NorthWest Indiana Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        |  |  |
|                                   |   |   |
| Name                                   |    | State or Other Jurisdiction ofIncorporation or Organization |
|                                   |   |   |
| Great Plains Oilfield Rental, L.L.C.   |    | Oklahoma |
| Keystone Rock & Excavation, L.L.C. |    | Oklahoma |
| Nomac Drilling, L.L.C.                 |    | Oklahoma |
| Performance Technologies, L.L.C.       |    | Oklahoma |
| PTL Prop Solutions, L.L.C.             |    | Oklahoma |
| Seventy Seven Finance Inc.             |    | Delaware |
| Seventy Seven Land Company LLC         |   | Oklahoma |
| Seventy Seven Operating LLC            |   | Oklahoma |
| SSE Leasing LLC                        |   | Oklahoma |
| Western Wisconsin Sand Company, LLC    |    | Wisconsin |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          20,786
<SECURITIES>                                    37,175
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,277
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,980
<PP&E>                                          16,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,745
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,074
<SALES>                                         36,165
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,217
<CGS>                                            1,998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,243
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   809
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,936
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,381
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,555
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,555
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .75
        

</TABLE>