60814 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 190 / Friday, October 1, 2010 / Notices 

1No response to this request for information is 

required if a currently valid Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the 

OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 11–5–224, 

expiration date June 30, 2011. Public reporting 

Iqurmuit Traditional Council 

Ivanoff Bay Village 

Kaguyak Village 

Organized Village of Kake 

Kaktovik Village (aka Barter Island) 

Village of Kalskag 

Village of Kaltag 

Native Village of Kanatak 

Native Village of Karluk 

Organized Village of Kasaan 

Kasigluk Traditional Elders Council 

Kenaitze Indian Tribe 

Ketchikan Indian Corporation 

Native Village of Kiana 

King Island Native Community 

King Salmon Tribe 

Native Village of Kipnuk 

Native Village of Kivalina 

Klawock Cooperative Association 

Native Village of Kluti Kaah (aka Copper 

Center) 

Knik Tribe 

Native Village of Kobuk 

Kokhanok Village 

Native Village of Kongiganak 

Village of Kotlik 

Native Village of Kotzebue 

Native Village of Koyuk 

Koyukuk Native Village 

Organized Village of Kwethluk 

Native Village of Kwigillingok 

Native Village of Kwinhagak (aka 

Quinhagak) 

Native Village of Larsen Bay 

Levelock Village 

Lime Village 

Village of Lower Kalskag 

Manley Hot Springs Village 

Manokotak Village 

Native Village of Marshall (aka Fortuna 

Ledge) 

Native Village of Mary’s Igloo 

McGrath Native Village 

Native Village of Mekoryuk 

Mentasta Traditional Council 

Metlakatla Indian Community, Annette 

Island Reserve 

Native Village of Minto 

Naknek Native Village 

Native Village of Nanwalek (aka English 

Bay) 

Native Village of Napaimute 

Native Village of Napakiak 

Native Village of Napaskiak 

Native Village of Nelson Lagoon 

Nenana Native Association 

New Koliganek Village Council 

New Stuyahok Village 

Newhalen Village 

Newtok Village 

Native Village of Nightmute 

Nikolai Village 

Native Village of Nikolski 

Ninilchik Village 

Native Village of Noatak 

Nome Eskimo Community 

Nondalton Village 

Noorvik Native Community 

Northway Village 

Native Village of Nuiqsut (aka Nooiksut) 

Nulato Village 

Nunakauyarmiut Tribe 

Native Village of Nunam Iqua (formerly 

the Native Village of Sheldon’s 

Point) 

Native Village of Nunapitchuk 

Village of Ohogamiut 

Village of Old Harbor 

Orutsararmuit Native Village (aka 

Bethel) 

Oscarville Traditional Village 

Native Village of Ouzinkie 

Native Village of Paimiut 

Pauloff Harbor Village 

Pedro Bay Village 

Native Village of Perryville 

Petersburg Indian Association 

Native Village of Pilot Point 

Pilot Station Traditional Village 

Native Village of Pitka’s Point 

Platinum Traditional Village 

Native Village of Point Hope 

Native Village of Point Lay 

Native Village of Port Graham 

Native Village of Port Heiden 

Native Village of Port Lions 

Portage Creek Village (aka Ohgsenakale) 

Pribilof Islands Aleut Communities of 

St. Paul & St. George Islands 

Qagan Tayagungin Tribe of Sand Point 

Village 

Qawalangin Tribe of Unalaska 

Rampart Village 

Village of Red Devil 

Native Village of Ruby 

Saint George Island (See Pribilof Islands 

Aleut Communities of St. Paul & St. 

George Islands) 

Native Village of Saint Michael 

Saint Paul Island (See Pribilof Islands 

Aleut Communities of St. Paul & St. 

George Islands) 

Village of Salamatoff 

Native Village of Savoonga 

Organized Village of Saxman 

Native Village of Scammon Bay 

Native Village of Selawik 

Seldovia Village Tribe 

Shageluk Native Village 

Native Village of Shaktoolik 

Native Village of Shishmaref 

Native Village of Shungnak 

Sitka Tribe of Alaska 

Skagway Village 

Village of Sleetmute 

Village of Solomon 

South Naknek Village 

Stebbins Community Association 

Native Village of Stevens 

Village of Stony River 

Sun’aq Tribe of Kodiak (formerly the 

Shoonaq’ Tribe of Kodiak) 

Takotna Village 

Native Village of Tanacross 

Native Village of Tanana 

Tangirnaq Native Village (formerly 

Lesnoi Village (aka Woody Island)) 

Native Village of Tatitlek 

Native Village of Tazlina 

Telida Village 

Native Village of Teller 

Native Village of Tetlin 

Central Council of the Tlingit & Haida 

Indian Tribes 

Traditional Village of Togiak 

Tuluksak Native Community 

Native Village of Tuntutuliak 

Native Village of Tununak 

Twin Hills Village 

Native Village of Tyonek 

Ugashik Village 

Umkumiut Native Village (previously 

listed as Umkumiute Native Village) 

Native Village of Unalakleet 

Native Village of Unga 

Village of Venetie (See Native Village of 

Venetie Tribal Government) 

Native Village of Venetie Tribal 

Government (Arctic Village and 

Village of Venetie) 

Village of Wainwright 

Native Village of Wales 

Native Village of White Mountain 

Wrangell Cooperative Association 

Yakutat Tlingit Tribe 

[FR Doc. 2010–24640 Filed 9–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–4J–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigations Nos. 731–TA–308–310, 520, 

and 521 (Third Review)] 

Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings 

From Brazil, China, Japan, Taiwan, and 

Thailand 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of five-year reviews 

concerning the antidumping duty orders 

on carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings 

from Brazil, China, Japan, Taiwan, and 

Thailand. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it has instituted reviews 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act) 

to determine whether revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders on carbon 

steel butt-weld pipe fittings from Brazil, 

China, Japan, Taiwan, and Thailand 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of material injury. 

Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, 

interested parties are requested to 

respond to this notice by submitting the 

information specified below to the 

Commission; 1 to be assured of 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 190 / Friday, October 1, 2010 / Notices 60815 

burden for the request is estimated to average 15 

hours per response. Please send comments 

regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to 

the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20436. 

consideration, the deadline for 

responses is November 1, 2010. 

Comments on the adequacy of responses 

may be filed with the Commission by 

December 14, 2010. For further 

information concerning the conduct of 

these reviews and rules of general 

application, consult the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 

201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and 

F (19 CFR part 207), as most recently 

amended at 74 FR 2847 (January 16, 

2009). 

DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On the dates listed 

below, the Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) issued antidumping duty 

orders on the subject imports: 

Order date Product/country Investigation No. F.R. cite 

12/17/86 ............ Carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings/Brazil ................................................................. 731–TA–308 .............. 51 FR 45152. 

12/17/86 ............ Carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings/Taiwan .............................................................. 731–TA–310 .............. 51 FR 45152. 

2/10/87 .............. Carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings/Japan ................................................................ 731–TA–309 .............. 52 FR 4167. 

7/6/92 ................ Carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings/China ................................................................ 731–TA–520 .............. 57 FR 29702. 

7/6/92 ................ Carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings/Thailand ............................................................ 731–TA–521 .............. 57 FR 29702. 

Following first five-year reviews by 

Commerce and the Commission, 

effective January 6, 2000, Commerce 

issued a notice of the continuation of 

the antidumping duty orders on imports 

of carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings 

from Brazil, China, Japan, Taiwan, and 

Thailand (65 FR 753). Following second 

five-year reviews by Commerce and the 

Commission, effective November 21, 

2005, Commerce issued a notice of the 

continuation of the antidumping duty 

orders on imports of carbon steel buttweld pipe fittings from Brazil, China, 

Japan, Taiwan, and Thailand (70 FR 

70059). The Commission is now 

conducting third reviews to determine 

whether revocation of the orders would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to the 

domestic industry within a reasonably 

foreseeable time. It will assess the 

adequacy of interested party responses 

to this notice of institution to determine 

whether to conduct full reviews or 

expedited reviews. The Commission’s 

determinations in any expedited 

reviews will be based on the facts 

available, which may include 

information provided in response to this 

notice. 

Definitions.—The following 

definitions apply to these reviews: 

(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or 

kind of merchandise that is within the 

scope of the five-year reviews, as 

defined by Commerce. 

(2) The Subject Countries in these 

reviews are Brazil, China, Japan, 

Taiwan, and Thailand. 

(3) The Domestic Like Product is the 

domestically produced product or 

products which are like, or in the 

absence of like, most similar in 

characteristics and uses with, the 

Subject Merchandise. In its original 

determinations, its expedited first fiveyear review determinations, and its full 

second five-year review determinations, 

the Commission defined the Domestic 

Like Product as carbon steel butt-weld 

pipe fittings having an inside diameter 

of less than 14 inches, whether finished 

or unfinished, as coextensive with 

Commerce’s scope. 

(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. 

producers as a whole of the Domestic 

Like Product, or those producers whose 

collective output of the Domestic Like 

Product constitutes a major proportion 

of the total domestic production of the 

product. In its original determinations, 

its expedited first five-year review 

determinations, and its full second fiveyear review determinations, the 

Commission defined a single Domestic 

Industry: Producers of finished and 

unfinished carbon steel butt-weld pipe 

fittings having an inside diameter of less 

than 14 inches, including integrated 

producers, converters, and combination 

producers which perform both 

integrated production and conversion. 

One Commissioner defined the 

Domestic Industry differently in the 

original determinations concerning 

Brazil, Japan, and Taiwan. In the 

original determinations concerning 

China and Thailand, the Commission 

excluded two domestic producers, Tube 

Line and Weldbend, from the Domestic 

Industry under the related parties 

provision. In its expedited first five-year 

review determinations, the Commission 

once again excluded Tube Line from the 

Domestic Industry under the related 

parties provision but found that 

Weldbend was no longer a related party 

eligible for exclusion. Certain 

Commissioners did not exclude Tube 

Line from the Domestic Industry in the 

expedited first five-year reviews. In the 

full second five-year review 

determinations, the Commission 

determined that appropriate 

circumstances did not exist for 

excluding any domestic producer from 

the Domestic Industry as a related party. 

(5) An Importer is any person or firm 

engaged, either directly or through a 

parent company or subsidiary, in 

importing the Subject Merchandise into 

the United States from a foreign 

manufacturer or through its selling 

agent. 

Participation in the reviews and 

public service list.—Persons, including 

industrial users of the Subject 

Merchandise and, if the merchandise is 

sold at the retail level, representative 

consumer organizations, wishing to 

participate in the reviews as parties 

must file an entry of appearance with 

the Secretary to the Commission, as 

provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the 

Commission’s rules, no later than 21 

days after publication of this notice in 

the Federal Register. The Secretary will 

maintain a public service list containing 

the names and addresses of all persons, 

or their representatives, who are parties 

to the reviews. 

Former Commission employees who 

are seeking to appear in Commission 

five-year reviews are advised that they 

may appear in a review even if they 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
60816 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 190 / Friday, October 1, 2010 / Notices 

participated personally and 

substantially in the corresponding 

underlying original investigation. The 

Commission’s designated agency ethics 

official has advised that a five-year 

review is not considered the ‘‘same 

particular matter’’ as the corresponding 

underlying original investigation for 

purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post 

employment statute for Federal 

employees, and Commission rule 

201.15(b) (19 CFR 201.15(b)), 73 FR 

24609 (May 5, 2008). This advice was 

developed in consultation with the 

Office of Government Ethics. 

Consequently, former employees are not 

required to seek Commission approval 

to appear in a review under Commission 

rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the 

corresponding underlying original 

investigation was pending when they 

were Commission employees. For 

further ethics advice on this matter, 

contact Carol McCue Verratti, Deputy 

Agency Ethics Official, at 202–205– 

3088. 

Limited disclosure of business 

proprietary information (BPI) under an 

administrative protective order (APO) 

and APO service list.—Pursuant to 

section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s 

rules, the Secretary will make BPI 

submitted in these reviews available to 

authorized applicants under the APO 

issued in the reviews, provided that the 

application is made no later than 21 

days after publication of this notice in 

the Federal Register. Authorized 

applicants must represent interested 

parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), 

who are parties to the reviews. A 

separate service list will be maintained 

by the Secretary for those parties 

authorized to receive BPI under the 

APO. 

Certification.—Pursuant to section 

207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any 

person submitting information to the 

Commission in connection with these 

reviews must certify that the 

information is accurate and complete to 

the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In 

making the certification, the submitter 

will be deemed to consent, unless 

otherwise specified, for the 

Commission, its employees, and 

contract personnel to use the 

information provided in any other 

reviews or investigations of the same or 

comparable products which the 

Commission conducts under Title VII of 

the Act, or in internal audits and 

investigations relating to the programs 

and operations of the Commission 

pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3. 

Written submissions.—Pursuant to 

section 207.61 of the Commission’s 

rules, each interested party response to 

this notice must provide the information 

specified below. The deadline for filing 

such responses is November 1, 2010. 

Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the 

Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as 

specified in Commission rule 

207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments 

concerning the adequacy of responses to 

the notice of institution and whether the 

Commission should conduct expedited 

or full reviews. The deadline for filing 

such comments is December 14, 2010. 

All written submissions must conform 

with the provisions of sections 201.8 

and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules and 

any submissions that contain BPI must 

also conform with the requirements of 

sections 201.6 and 207.7 of the 

Commission’s rules. The Commission’s 

rules do not authorize filing of 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means, except to 

the extent permitted by section 201.8 of 

the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 

FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Also, in 

accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 

207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each 

document filed by a party to the reviews 

must be served on all other parties to 

the reviews (as identified by either the 

public or APO service list as 

appropriate), and a certificate of service 

must accompany the document (if you 

are not a party to the reviews you do not 

need to serve your response). 

Inability to provide requested 

information.—Pursuant to section 

207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any 

interested party that cannot furnish the 

information requested by this notice in 

the requested form and manner shall 

notify the Commission at the earliest 

possible time, provide a full explanation 

of why it cannot provide the requested 

information, and indicate alternative 

forms in which it can provide 

equivalent information. If an interested 

party does not provide this notification 

(or the Commission finds the 

explanation provided in the notification 

inadequate) and fails to provide a 

complete response to this notice, the 

Commission may take an adverse 

inference against the party pursuant to 

section 776(b) of the Act in making its 

determinations in the reviews. 

Information to be Provided in 

Response to this Notice of Institution: If 

you are a domestic producer, union/ 

worker group, or trade/business 

association; import/export Subject 

Merchandise from more than one 

Subject Country; or produce Subject 

Merchandise in more than one Subject 

Country, you may file a single response. 

If you do so, please ensure that your 

response to each question includes the 

information requested for each pertinent 

Subject Country. As used below, the 

term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms. 

(1) The name and address of your firm 

or entity (including World Wide Web 

address) and name, telephone number, 

fax number, and E-mail address of the 

certifying official. 

(2) A statement indicating whether 

your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of 

the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union 

or worker group, a U.S. importer of the 

Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer 

or exporter of the Subject Merchandise, 

a U.S. or foreign trade or business 

association, or another interested party 

(including an explanation). If you are a 

union/worker group or trade/business 

association, identify the firms in which 

your workers are employed or which are 

members of your association. 

(3) A statement indicating whether 

your firm/entity is willing to participate 

in these reviews by providing 

information requested by the 

Commission. 

(4) A statement of the likely effects of 

the revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders on the Domestic Industry in 

general and/or your firm/entity 

specifically. In your response, please 

discuss the various factors specified in 

section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1675a(a)) including the likely volume of 

subject imports, likely price effects of 

subject imports, and likely impact of 

imports of Subject Merchandise on the 

Domestic Industry. 

(5) A list of all known and currently 

operating U.S. producers of the 

Domestic Like Product. Identify any 

known related parties and the nature of 

the relationship as defined in section 

771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1677(4)(B)). 

(6) A list of all known and currently 

operating U.S. importers of the Subject 

Merchandise and producers of the 

Subject Merchandise in each Subject 

Country that currently export or have 

exported Subject Merchandise to the 

United States or other countries after 

2004. 

(7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in 

the U.S. market for the Domestic Like 

Product and the Subject Merchandise 

(including street address, World Wide 

Web address, and the name, telephone 

number, fax number, and E-mail address 

of a responsible official at each firm). 

(8) A list of known sources of 

information on national or regional 

prices for the Domestic Like Product or 

the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or 

other markets. 

(9) If you are a U.S. producer of the 

Domestic Like Product, provide the 

following information on your firm’s 

operations on that product during 

calendar year 2009, except as noted 

(report quantity data in pounds and 

value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 190 / Friday, October 1, 2010 / Notices 60817 

1No response to this request for information is 

required if a currently valid Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the 

OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 11–5–226, 

expiration date June 30, 2011. Public reporting 

burden for the request is estimated to average 15 

hours per response. Please send comments 

regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to 

the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20436. 

If you are a union/worker group or 

trade/business association, provide the 

information, on an aggregate basis, for 

the firms in which your workers are 

employed/which are members of your 

association. 

(a) Production (quantity) and, if 

known, an estimate of the percentage of 

total U.S. production of the Domestic 

Like Product accounted for by your 

firm’s(s’) production; 

(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to 

produce the Domestic Like Product (i.e., 

the level of production that your 

establishment(s) could reasonably have 

expected to attain during the year, 

assuming normal operating conditions 

(using equipment and machinery in 

place and ready to operate), normal 

operating levels (hours per week/weeks 

per year), time for downtime, 

maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a 

typical or representative product mix); 

(c) The quantity and value of U.S. 

commercial shipments of the Domestic 

Like Product produced in your U.S. 

plant(s); and 

(d) The quantity and value of U.S. 

internal consumption/company 

transfers of the Domestic Like Product 

produced in your U.S. plant(s). 

(e) The value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost 

of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, 

(iv) selling, general and administrative 

(SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating 

income of the Domestic Like Product 

produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include 

both U.S. and export commercial sales, 

internal consumption, and company 

transfers) for your most recently 

completed fiscal year (identify the date 

on which your fiscal year ends). 

(10) If you are a U.S. importer or a 

trade/business association of U.S. 

importers of the Subject Merchandise 

from any Subject Country, provide the 

following information on your firm’s(s’) 

operations on that product during 

calendar year 2009 (report quantity data 

in pounds and value data in U.S. 

dollars). If you are a trade/business 

association, provide the information, on 

an aggregate basis, for the firms which 

are members of your association. 

(a) The quantity and value (landed, 

duty-paid but not including 

antidumping duties) of U.S. imports 

and, if known, an estimate of the 

percentage of total U.S. imports of 

Subject Merchandise from the Subject 

Country(ies) accounted for by your 

firm’s(s’) imports; 

(b) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. 

port, including antidumping duties) of 

U.S. commercial shipments of Subject 

Merchandise imported from the Subject 

Country(ies); and 

(c) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. 

port, including antidumping duties) of 

U.S. internal consumption/company 

transfers of Subject Merchandise 

imported from the Subject Country(ies). 

(11) If you are a producer, an exporter, 

or a trade/business association of 

producers or exporters of the Subject 

Merchandise in the Subject 

Country(ies), provide the following 

information on your firm’s(s’) 

operations on that product during 

calendar year 2009 (report quantity data 

in pounds and value data in U.S. 

dollars, landed and duty-paid at the 

U.S. port but not including antidumping 

duties). If you are a trade/business 

association, provide the information, on 

an aggregate basis, for the firms which 

are members of your association. 

(a) Production (quantity) and, if 

known, an estimate of the percentage of 

total production of Subject Merchandise 

in the Subject Country(ies) accounted 

for by your firm’s(s’) production; and 

(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to 

produce the Subject Merchandise in the 

Subject Country(ies) (i.e., the level of 

production that your establishment(s) 

could reasonably have expected to 

attain during the year, assuming normal 

operating conditions (using equipment 

and machinery in place and ready to 

operate), normal operating levels (hours 

per week/weeks per year), time for 

downtime, maintenance, repair, and 

cleanup, and a typical or representative 

product mix); and 

(c) The quantity and value of your 

firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of 

Subject Merchandise and, if known, an 

estimate of the percentage of total 

exports to the United States of Subject 

Merchandise from each Subject Country 

accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. 

(12) Identify significant changes, if 

any, in the supply and demand 

conditions or business cycle for the 

Domestic Like Product that have 

occurred in the United States or in the 

market for the Subject Merchandise in 

the Subject Country(ies) after 2004, and 

significant changes, if any, that are 

likely to occur within a reasonably 

foreseeable time. Supply conditions to 

consider include technology; 

production methods; development 

efforts; ability to increase production 

(including the shift of production 

facilities used for other products and the 

use, cost, or availability of major inputs 

into production); and factors related to 

the ability to shift supply among 

different national markets (including 

barriers to importation in foreign 

markets or changes in market demand 

abroad). Demand conditions to consider 

include end uses and applications; the 

existence and availability of substitute 

products; and the level of competition 

among the Domestic Like Product 

produced in the United States, Subject 

Merchandise produced in the Subject 

Country(ies), and such merchandise 

from other countries. 

(13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of 

whether you agree with the above 

definitions of the Domestic Like Product 

and Domestic Industry; if you disagree 

with either or both of these definitions, 

please explain why and provide 

alternative definitions. 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.61 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 21, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24066 Filed 9–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–841 (Second 

Review)] 

Non-Frozen Concentrated Apple Juice 

From China 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of a five-year review 

concerning the antidumping duty order 

on non-frozen concentrated apple juice 

from China. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it has instituted a review 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act) 

to determine whether revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on non-frozen 

concentrated apple juice from China 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of material injury. 

Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, 

interested parties are requested to 

respond to this notice by submitting the 

information specified below to the 

Commission; 1 to be assured of 

consideration, the deadline for 

responses is November 1, 2010. 

Comments on the adequacy of responses 

may be filed with the Commission by 

December 14, 2010. For further 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES