alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Civilian Personnel Policy) (DUSD (CPP)), Department of Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

Notice of proposal to design and implement a personnel management demonstration project; correction.

# SUMMARY:

On September 9, 2010 (75 FR 55199), DoD published a notice concerning the proposed conversion of certain National Security Personnel System (NSPS)-covered employees to a personnel management demonstration project before the end of April 2011. The proposal pertains to NSPS-covered employees at the Army Research, Development and Engineering Command, Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC). Within that notice the descriptors for levels IV and V are incorrect under factor 1-1 and level VI was erroneously added to factor 2-3. This notice corrects those errors.

# DATES:

                        Written comments must be submitted on or before October 12, 2010 (                        *see*                         the September 9, 2010, notice for details).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*ARDEC:*                         Ms. Christina Duncan, U.S. Army ARDEC, Human Capital Management Office, Building 1, 3rd Floor, RDAR-EIH, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000.                    

*DoD:*                         Ms. Betty Duffield, CPMS-PSSC, Suite B-200, 1400 Key Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22209-5144.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Corrections

In the notice published on September 9, 2010, in FR Doc. 2010-22280:

1. On pages 55225 and 55226, in the table under factor 1-1, the entries for descriptor Levels I, II, III, and VI are republished and the entries for descriptor Levels IV and V are corrected to read:
      ( print page 60092)          ( print page 60093)    
2. On page 55236, in the table under factor 2-3, the entry for descriptor Level VI is removed.

Dated: September 22, 2010.

Mitchell S. Bryman,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010-24427 Filed 9-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### H. O. LADNER, Appellant, v. Anthony J. CELEBREZZE, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Appellee.

No. 21298.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 22, 1964.

John L. Fulbright, Beaumont, Tex., for appellant.

Bryan Blalock, Asst. U. S. Atty., Beaumont, Tex., Wm. Wayne Justice, U. S. Atty., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, PRETTY-MAN* and JONES, Circuit Judges.

*

 Senior Circuit Judge of the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Ladner filed an application to establish a period of disability and for disability benefits under Sections 216(i) and 223 of the Social Security Act.1 A hearing was held before an examiner and a decision rendered in which it was determined that Ladner did not qualify under the Act. After exhausting his administrative remedies Ladner brought this action in the District Court to review the decision. The court found that the decision was supported by substantial evidence and granted the Secretary’s motion for summary judgment. Ladner has appealed.

We find no error.

Affirmed.

1

. 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      I, Jeffrey I. Dreben, the Chief executive officer of CVF Technologies
Corporation (the "Company") hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge: that the Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004 accompanying this certification (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: April 8, 2005

                                                    CVF TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

                                                    /s/  Jeffrey I. Dreben
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    JEFFREY I. DREBEN
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      I, Robert L. Miller, the chief financial officer of CVF Technologies
Corporation (the "Company") hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge: that the Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004 accompanying this certification (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: April 8, 2005

                                                    CVF TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

                                                    /s/  Robert L. Miller
                                                    ---------------------
                                                    ROBERT L. MILLER
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
#### Joseph MODELISTE v. Marshall Estus SEHORN, Allen Toussaint, Rhinelander Music, Inc., Sansu Enterprises, Inc., Marsaint Music, Inc., and Marshall Estus Sehorn Productions, Inc.

No. 2011-CC-1883.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Modeliste, Joseph; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. E, No. 84-9262; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-C-0776.

Denied.
Exhibit 10.1
 
 Amendment Lessor
  Master
Lease First Amendment Second Amendment Third Amendment Fourth Amendment Fifth Amendment Sixth Amendment Existing Master Lease
   Definitions
 Tenant Improvement Allowance




---



##### 



Representations and Warranties of Lessee
 Expenses of Lender
 Execution and Counterparts
 Headings
 Enforceability
  2




---



##### 



Signature Page to
 LESSOR:
STERLING ACQUISITION CORP.,
a Kentucky corporationBy:
    /s/ Daniel J. BoothName:
    Daniel J. BoothTitle:
    Chief Operating Officer STATE OF MARYLAND
    
    
    )COUNTY OF BALTIMORE
    
    
    )
  /s/ Judith A. JacobsNotary Public, Baltimore County, MDMy commission expires: ______________________ Signature Page 1 of 2




---



##### 



Signature Page to
 LESSEE:
DIVERSICARE LEASING CORP.,
a Tennessee corporationBy:
    /s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    EVP and CFO STATE OF TENNESSEE
    
    
    )COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
    
    
    )
  /s/ Brenda WimsattNotary Public, Tenn. County, WilliamsonMy commission expires: ______________________ Signature Page 2 of 2




---



##### 



Acknowledgment to
 Amendment
 ADVOCAT, INC. a Delaware corporationBy:
    /s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    EVP & CFO STATE OF TENNESSEE
    
    
    )COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
    
    
    )
  /s/ Brenda WimsattNotary Public, Tenn. County,  WilliamsonMy Commission expires: ______________________ Acknowledgement Page 1 of 5




---



##### 



Acknowledgment to
 DIVERSICARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES CO.,
a Tennessee corporationBy:
    /s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    EVP & CFO STATE OF TENNESSEE
    
    
    )COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
    
    
    )
  /s/ Brenda WimsattNotary Public, Tenn. County,  WilliamsonMy Commission Expires: ______________________ Acknowledgement Page 2 of 5




---



##### 



Acknowledgment to
 ADVOCAT FINANCE INC.,
a Delaware corporationBy:

/s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    EVP & CFO STATE OF TENNESSEE
    
    
    )COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
    
    
    )
  /s/ Brenda WimsattNotary Public, Tenn. County,  WilliamsonMy Commission Expires: ______________________ Acknowledgement Page 3 of 5




---



##### 



Acknowledgment to
 STERLING HEALTH CARE
MANAGEMENT, INC., a Kentucky corporationBy:

/s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    EVP & CFO STATE OF TENNESSEE
    
    
    )COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
    
    
    )
  /s/ Brenda WimsattNotary Public, Tenn. County,  WilliamsonMy Commission Expires: ______________________ Acknowledgement Page 4 of 5




---



##### 



Acknowledgment to
 DIVERSICARE TEXAS I, LLCBy:

/s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    EVP & CFO DIVERSICARE BALLINGER, LLC
DIVERSICARE DOCTORS, LLC
DIVERSICARE ESTATES, LLC
DIVERSICARE HUMBLE, LLC
DIVERSICARE KATY, LLC
DIVERSICARE NORMANDY TERRACE, LLC
DIVERSICARE TREEMONT, LLCBY:
    DIVERSICARE TEXAS I, LLC,its sole member By:

/s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    EVP & CFO STATE OF TENNESSEE
    
    
    )COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON
    
    
    )
  /s/ Brenda WimsattNotary Public, Tenn. County,  WilliamsonMy Commission Expires: ______________________ Acknowledgement Page 5 of 5
#### UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, d/b/a Millennium Open MRI, (Horace McQueen), Respondent.

No. 4D11-3248.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 1, 2012.

Lara J. Edelstein, Miami, for petitioner.

Robert J. Bradford, Jr., of the Law Office of R.J. Bradford, Jr. P.C., Gray, TN, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

United Automobile Insurance Company petitions for a writ of certiorari seeking review of a circuit court order dismissing petitioner’s appeal. We grant the petition.

Based on a scrivener’s error in the final judgment the circuit court, sitting in its *1285appellate capacity, believed the trial court’s order was not final or appealable and issued United an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed. United responded that the order was final and there were no remaining matters pending in the trial court. There is no dispute that judicial labor in the trial court had ended.

The circuit court permitted United to obtain a corrected final judgment, but provided that if it failed to do so before the appellate record was transmitted, the appeal would be dismissed. At the time this order issued, the clerk had already transmitted the record on appeal, making it impossible for United to fully comply with the appellate court’s order. However, United obtained a corrected final judgment and five days later filed an amended notice of appeal, otherwise complying with the order. Twenty-nine days after the trial court entered the corrected final judgment, the circuit court dismissed the appeal because the record was transmitted before United complied with the circuit court’s order. United did not receive the circuit court’s dismissal order in time to file a new notice of appeal from the corrected final judgment.

We agree that, based on the circumstances in this case, dismissal of the appeal was a departure from the essential requirements of law, and United was denied due process. *See Tucker v. Charles D. Franken, P.A.,*62 So.3d 1207 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); *Rupp v. Dep’t of Health,*963 So.2d 790, 793 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (recognizing “Florida law is clear that the law does not impose penalties upon an individual for failing to take certain actions which it is physically impossible for that individual to take”); *Perez & Perez, M.D., P.A. v. Holder,*867 So.2d 622, 624 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (“Due process requires that a court imposing a deadline on a litigant for the performance of a particular act give the litigant reasonable notice of the deadline before the deadline arrives.”). We grant the petition for second-tier certiorari and quash the dismissal order.

*Petition Granted.*

WARNER, HAZOURI and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM APPLICABLE
1997 INTERIM FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF CORECOMM  INCORPORATED.  THE  SCHEDULE IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            42,766,000
<SECURITIES>                                      25,390,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                     23,235,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (2,758,000)
<INVENTORY>                                        5,103,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   7,885,000
<PP&E>                                           178,553,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (50,091,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   397,039,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             29,863,000
<BONDS>                                          200,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             135,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       157,515,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     397,039,000
<SALES>                                           12,335,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 111,922,000
<CGS>                                             14,331,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     27,114,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  54,513,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                14,261,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      643,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (1,241,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (598,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (3,959,000)
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (4,557,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (0.35)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.35)<F1>

<FN>
<F1>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE ADOPTION OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
    STANDARDS NO.128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE"
</FN>

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, being, Cornelis F. Wit, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Cornelis F. Wit                            
|Cornelis F. Wit                                
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

March 31, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,265,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  783,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    704,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,919,000
<PP&E>                                      69,187,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,553,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              70,772,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       86,784,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (25,311,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                70,772,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            52,552,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               51,474,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,342,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,214,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,214,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,214,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Presidential Documents 56465 

Proclamation 8560 of September 10, 2010 

National Grandparents Day, 2010 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Throughout our history, American families have been guided and strengthened by the support of devoted grandparents. These mentors have a special 

place in our homes and communities, ensuring the stories and traditions 

of our heritage are passed down through generations. On National Grandparents Day, we honor those who have helped shape the character of our 

Nation, and we thank these role models for their immeasurable acts of 

love, care, and understanding. 

Grandparents witness great milestones in the lives of their children and 

grandchildren. Whether with us when we learn to read or ride a bicycle, 

they celebrate early triumphs, console us when we are distressed, and cultivate our dreams. Through decades of hard work and sacrifice, our forebears 

have also enabled many of the rights and opportunities now accessible 

to all Americans. As a country and a people, our grandparents have made 

us who we are today. 

National Grandparents Day presents a chance to show our profound appreciation and respect for the central roles that family elders play in our lives. 

The legacy of these selfless caregivers is not only reflected in the principles 

and sense of purpose they inspire in their loved ones, but also in their 

unique ability to reach across ages and enrich the lives of generations 

of Americans. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 12, 2010, 

as National Grandparents Day. I call upon all Americans to take the time 

to honor their own grandparents and those in their community. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this tenth day of 

September, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23202 

Filed 9–14–10; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3195–W0–P 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with MISCELLANEOUSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

            Subsidiary of Waypoint Financial              State of Organization
            --------------------------------              ---------------------
     Waypoint Bank ..................................             United States
     Waypoint Financial Investment Corporation ......             Delaware
     New Service Corporation ........................             Pennsylvania
     Waypoint Service Corporation ...................             Pennsylvania
     Waypoint Brokerage Services, Inc. ..............             Pennsylvania
     Waypoint Insurance Services, Inc. ..............             Pennsylvania
     Owen Insurance Inc. ............................             Pennsylvania
     Advanced Real Estate Associates ................             Pennsylvania
     Lenders Support Group Inc. .....................             Pennsylvania

            Subsidiary of Waypoint Bank                   State of Organization
            ---------------------------                   ---------------------
     Waypoint Investment Corporation ................             Delaware
     H. S. Service Corporation ......................             Pennsylvania
     First Harrisburg Service Corporation ...........             Pennsylvania
     C.B.L. Service Corporation .....................             Pennsylvania
     AVSTAR Mortgage Corporation ....................             Pennsylvania

                                       86