alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5631]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           THE NATION'S MALL

  (Mr. GOSS asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. GOSS. Mr. Speaker, the Nation's Capital is famed for its parks 
and wide open spaces. The Mall, the area between this Capitol and the 
Lincoln Memorial, is one of the most venerable and most visited of our 
alabaster city's sights and all Americans have a right to enjoy it. Of 
course, we have to ensure that one set of rights does not outweigh 
another. Today, a walk down The Mall suggests that we have lost our 
balance on that score. Simply put, large parts of The Mall have become 
a disorderly tourist trinket bazaar. This famous open space has become 
haven to countless unsightly, makeshift tables and weather covers from 
which temporary vendors push their merchandise in an atmosphere of 
cacophony and hustle. Those vendors, it seems, secured U.S. Park 
Service permits under their first amendment rights. As an ardent 
defender of the Constitution and its amendments, I certainly support 
the right to free speech. But Americans also have a right to and an 
expectation of unobstructed, safe, and peaceful use of their national 
parks. Especially one with such majestic monuments. I hope we can 
restore some balance and find a more suitable spot to relocate the 
tourist merchants while there is still summer ahead to enjoy The Mall 
peacefully.

                          ____________________
```
#### Danielle DRONET v. Scott L. HUNT.

No. 2010-CJ-2813.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 5, 2010.

In re Dronet, Danielle; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 647-343; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-C-1071.

Stay recalled; Writ denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2002 (the  "Report") of TF Financial  Corporation  (the  "Company") as filed
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof,  we, John R.
Stranford,  President and Chief Executive Officer, and Dennis R. Stewart, Senior
Vice  President and Chief  Financial  Officer  (Principal  Accounting  Officer),
hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





                                     /s/ John R. Stranford
                                     ---------------------
Date:      August 9, 2002            John R. Stranford
    ---------------------
                                     President and CEO
                                     (Principal Executive Officer)


                                     /s/ Dennis R. Stewart
                                     ---------------------
Date:      August 9, 2002            Dennis R. Stewart
     --------------------
                                     Senior Vice President and
                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                     (Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)


                                       20
583 A.2d 310

#### DEBORAH A. MEDER, ETC. v. RESORTS INTERNATIONAL HOTEL, INC. v. CLAREMONT INTERIOR CONTRACTORS, INC.

January 23, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 240 *N.J.Super.*470, 573 A.2d 922)
#### STATE ex rel. Kevin GOLDSTON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0778.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2011.

In re Goldston, Kevin; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. K, No. 430-300; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-0125.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *678
      *State ex rel. Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.
News United States Air Force
 Yesterday’s Air Force: AF museum opens new buildingPublished June 28, 2016
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Jarid Watson
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- The National Museum of the U.S. Air Force in Dayton, Ohio, is showing off its brand new hangar full of historical aircraft and tons of Air Force history. It features four sections: presidential, research and development, space, and global reach.
Yesterday's Air Force is a history and heritage featurette series profiling significant people and missions from the Air Force's past.National Museum of the U.S. Air Force 



history 



Air Force One 



SecAF 



YAF
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Petro Stopping Centers, L.P. (the Company), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This
written statement is being furnished to the SEC as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.               
|                      |  | (J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)                 
|                      |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
|                      | 
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Edward Escudero                  
|                      |  | (Edward Escudero)                    
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             668
<SECURITIES>                                    66,664
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,259
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,500)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,821
<PP&E>                                          25,634
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,647)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,495
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       120,460
<OTHER-SE>                                     (51,717)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,646
<SALES>                                         31,519
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,519
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,067)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,067)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**Pursuant      to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**Section 906      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|                                       |                                                                                                                                            |                                    |
|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                       |                                                                                                                                            |
|                                  |                                                                                                                                       |                               |
|                                       |                                                                                                                                            | /s/ Andrew                R. Skobe |
|                                       | Andrew                R. Skobe                                                                                                                  |
|                                       | Principal                Financial Officer of Icahn Enterprises G.P. Inc.,the                General Partner of Icahn Enterprises Holdings L.P. |
| Date:                March 31, 2008   |                                                                                                                                            |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HORIZON FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

                (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,784
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     19,283
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         50,577
<ALLOWANCE>                                        387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,652
<DEPOSITS>                                      55,210
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,647
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                568
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,222
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  76,652
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,074
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  343
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    16
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,433
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 646
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 808
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              625
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       95
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (203)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       (203)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (127)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.29)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.10
<LOANS-NON>                                        516
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    592
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   318
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       26
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  387
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               387
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             33

</TABLE>
#### Stone Cattle Company v. F. M. Davis.

(No. 3786.)

May 1, 1886.

Appeal from Wichita County.

Opinion by

Hurt,'J.

§ 149. *Injunction; dissolution of; judgment on dissolution of; case stated.*Appellant obtained an injunction against appellee, collector of taxes of Wichita county, restraining him from collecting $504, the amount of taxes assessed upon certain cattle, the property of appellant. The ground for the injunction, as alleged in the petition, was that appellant did not own auy cattle in Wichita county on the 1st day of January 1884, the year for which said tax was sought to be collected, and had never owned any cattle in said county subject to taxation. Appellee answered the petition under oath denying the truth of. the allegations therein, and alleging matters showing that appellant was legally responsible for said taxes. Upon a hearing of the case on petition and answer, the injunction was dissolved, and judgment was rendered against appellant and the sureties upon the injunction bond for the amount of said taxes, for ten per cent, damages on said amount, and for costs. *Held:*1. The injunction was properly dissolved. 2. The judgment for ten per cent, damages was a proper judgment. [R. S. art. 2894; W. & W. Con. Rep. § 1031.] 3. The judgment for the amount of the taxes is erroneous. [R. R. Co. v. White, 57 Tex. 129.]

Reversed and rendered.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Railroad Retirement Board

Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold a meeting on September 29, 2010, 10 a.m. at the Board's meeting room on the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:

## (1) Executive Committee Reports

The entire meeting will be open to the public. The person to contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

Dated: September 20, 2010.

Beatrice Ezerski,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-23909 Filed 9-21-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
News United States Air Force
 Norwegian F-35 flies for first time under Norwegian commandPublished Dec. 16, 2015
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Ridge Shan
                        
                        
                        56th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. (AFNS) --**
                Maj. Morten Hanche, a Royal Norwegian Air Force F-35 Lightning II student pilot training with the 62nd Fighter Squadron, flew the first Norwegian F-35 sortie here Dec. 14.Hanche has been training at Luke Air Force Base under the instruction of American pilots for the past several months in order to become Norway's first F-35 pilot and instructor, part of a wider effort to foster international cooperation of global F-35 fleet development, which include the air forces of partner nations Australia and Italy."The flight was smooth and it was a good sortie," Hanche said. "We worked a close air support scenario with ground controllers and practiced integration with ground forces. The aircraft was very well-behaved."This event, which marked the first flight of a Norwegian-bound F-35 at the hands of a Norwegian pilot, was attended and observed by Maj. Gen. Per-Egil Rygg, the Royal Norwegian Air Force chief of staff."The way Luke Air Force Base and the 56th Fighter Wing have handled this flight and the overall training of our pilots is extraordinary," Rygg said. "This partnership is very important to Norway, and I'm very proud today to have seen the first time a Norwegian F-35 has been flown by a Norwegian pilot."The F-35, produced at the Lockheed Martin Corp. facility in Texas, is one of the first two Norwegian F-35s produced; both of which are currently stationed at Luke AFB for development and training.Lt. Col. Gregory Frana, the 62nd FS commander, flew alongside Hanche and guided him through the sortie. Frana commands the training efforts of the international pilots assigned to the 62nd FS."This was a momentous occasion for Norway, for Luke and for the United States Air Force," Frana said. "We've been standing up all of our operations here with our international partnerships in mind, and these relationships will continue to develop as we receive more F-35s from all of our eight partner nations."Two other Norwegian pilots are now undergoing the initial academic phase of their training here, with more slated to arrive in March. The pilots will eventually join Hanche in flying the F-35. Norwegian maintainers are also at Luke AFB, learning to repair and maintain the F-35s that will one day be on their home flightlines in Norway. Eventually, all of the airmen will return home to help develop the training program for their own air force.Luke AFB 



ACC 



F-35 



Royal Norwegian air force 



Norway 



sortie
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 84 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1081]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             IN OPPOSITION TO TRADE SANCTIONS AGAINST JAPAN

                                 ______

                           HON. JIM McDERMOTT

                             of washington

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, May 18, 1995
  Mr. McDERMOTT. Mr. Speaker, the unsatisfactory outcome of almost 2 
years of bilateral negotiations on access to the Japanese automotive 
market is disappointing.
  However, unilateral imposition of 6 billion dollars' worth of 
sanctions on Japanese products by the United States is a dangerous and 
unworkable solution.
  Under the rules and procedures of the WTO, if any member country 
feels that it has been wronged, it has an obligation to go to the WTO 
first before applying sanctions and certainly not in concert with the 
application of sanctions.
  If the administration continues to insist that imposition of punitive 
sanctions against Japanese luxury cars is the best way to force Japan 
to open its markets, the United States should set an example for the 
rest of our trading partners and file a WTO complaint against Japan.
  Let's take advantage of the WTO's dispute settlement procedure, which 
we helped negotiate.
  Unilateral imposition of sanctions by the United States against the 
Japanese sends the message to the rest of the world that we have no 
confidence in the WTO's ability to decide the case fairly.
  Let's not restrict free trade in the United States in an effort to 
open up markets abroad. Punitive sanctions that have the potential to 
cost thousands of United States jobs in a very short period of time and 
do nothing to achieve our goal of opening up the Japanese automotive 
market are not the answer.

                          ____________________
```