alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 12 - 00454 - CV IN THE MATTER OF L.F .R.

---------- FROM THE 323RD DISTRICT C OURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant entered a plea of true to delinquent conduct

— aggravated robbery; the trial court adjudicated him delinquent. 2 After a disposition hearing, the trial court ordered Appellant committed t o the Texas Juvenile Justice Department (TJJD) for an indeterminate sentence

. In a single issue , Appellant argues that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the trial court’s finding s under Texas Family Code section 54.04(i)(1), subsections ( A),

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2 Appellant does not appeal from the adjudication order.2

(B), and (C)

. Subsection (B) requires the trial court to find, before committing a juvenile to TJJD, that reasonable efforts were made to prevent or eliminate the need for the juvenile’s removal from the home and to make it possible for the juvenile t o return to the juvenile’s home. Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 54.04(i) (1)(B) (West Supp. 2012). Although the trial court included the required statutory findings in its disposition order, the State concedes

–– and we agree

–– that there is no evidence in the record supporting a section 54.04(i)(1)(B) finding that reasonable efforts were made to prevent or eliminate the need for the juvenile’s removal from the home and to make it possible for the juvenile to return to the ju venile’s home. See In re A.D. , 287 S.W.3d 356, 367 (Tex. App.

— Texarkana 2009, pet. denied ) ( holding that evidence did not support trial court’s findings under section 54.04(i) and remanding for a new disposition hearing ) ; In re J.S. , 993 S.W.2d 370, 374

– 75 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1999, no pet.) ( sa me ); In re K.L.C. , 972 S.W.2d 203, 206

– 07 (Tex. App.

— Beaumont 1998, no pet.) (same); In re A.S. , 954 S.W.2d 855, 862

– 63 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 1997, no pet.) (same). We sustain Appellant’s sole issue , reverse the trial court’s disposition order , and remand th e case to the trial court for a new disposition hearing. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 56.01(i) (providing that appellate court may remand an order that it reverses for further proceedings by the trial court).

SUE WALKER J USTICE PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.3

DELIVERED: May 2, 2013
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7768

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CARLOSE DEMOND ROBINSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (6:03-cr-00616-HMH-1)

Submitted: March 28, 2007 Decided: April 12, 2007

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlose Demond Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Reginald I. Lloyd,

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, Isaac Louis

Johnson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville,

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
1

See United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 667 n.42 (1984).

2

See United States v Rouse, 410 F.3d 1005, 1009 (8th Cir.

2005); United States v. Wallace, 528 F.2d 863, 866 (4th Cir. 1976).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Carlose Demond Robinson appeals the district court’s

orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 27 motion and his Fed. R. Crim.

P. 33 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of

discretion. We note that a Rule 27 motion to perpetuate testimony

is available only under the civil rules, which are inapplicable to

a criminal proceeding such as this. While the district court had

jurisdiction to entertain the Rule 33 motion for new trial based on

newly discovered evidence,1 we conclude that the motion fails on

the merits.2 Accordingly, we affirm. We deny the motion to

appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1337 

AN ACT 

To provide for a feasibility study of alternatives to augment 

the water supplies of the Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy District and cities served by the District. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1337 EH

1 SECTION 1. CENTRAL OKLAHOMA MASTER CONSERVATORY 

2 DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY. 

3 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that— 

4 (1) Thunderbird Lake, located on Little River 

5 in central Oklahoma, was constructed in 1965 by the 

6 Bureau of Reclamation for flood control, water sup7 ply, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes; 

8 (2) the available yield of Thunderbird Lake is 

9 allocated to the Central Oklahoma Master Conserv10 atory District, which supplies municipal and indus11 trial water supplies to the cities of Norman, Midwest 

12 City, and Del City, Oklahoma; and 

13 (3) studies conducted by the Bureau during fis14 cal year 2003 indicate that the District will require 

15 additional water supplies to meet the future needs of 

16 the District, including through— 

17 (A) the drilling of additional wells; 

18 (B) the implementation of a seasonal pool 

19 plan at Thunderbird Lake; 

20 (C) the construction of terminal storage to 

21 hold wet-weather yield from Thunderbird Lake; 

22 (D) a reallocation of water storage; and 

23 (E) the importation of surplus water from 

24 sources outside the basin of Thunderbird Lake. 

25 (b) STUDY.—Beginning no later than 1 year after the 

26 date of enactment of this Act, the Commissioner of the 
3 

•HR 1337 EH

1 Bureau of Reclamation shall conduct a feasibility study 

2 of alternatives to augment the water supplies of the Cen3 tral Oklahoma Master Conservatory District and cities 

4 served by the District, including recommendations of the 

5 Commissioner, if any. 

6 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

7 authorized to be appropriated to the Commissioner of the 

8 Bureau of Reclamation $900,000 to conduct the study 

9 under subsection (b). 

Passed the House of Representatives October 22, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1337 

AN ACT 

To provide for a feasibility study of alternatives to 

served by the District. homa Master Conservancy District and cities augment the water supplies of the Central Okla-
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas L. Saeli, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-K of Noble International, Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



|                     |  |        |  |                                                                                   
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 29, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/    THOMAS L.
SAELI                                                            
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Thomas L. Saeli                                                                   
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of Noble International, Ltd.
#### Milton R. GLOVER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Melvin J. BROOKER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

Nos. 14835, 14836.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Feb. 3, 1960.

Decided March 31, 1960.

Mr. Joseph Zitomer (appointed by the District Court), Silver Spring, Md., for appellants.

Mr. Lewis Carroll, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before Washington, Danaher and Bastian, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal their conviction for the crimes of robbery (three counts) and assault with a dangerous weapon.

*91The questions raised on these appeals are substantially the same as those raised in McGill v. United States, 1959, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 136, 270 F.2d 329, certiorari denied 80 S.Ct. 615, McGill having been convicted of the same crimes and in the same trial.

For reasons stated in McGill, the judgments in these cases are

Affirmed.
#### STATE ex rel. Troy A. GRANT v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0698.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2011.

In re Grant, Troy A.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of W. Baton Rouge, 18th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 002002; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 0183.

Denied.
#### D.C.K.L., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D10-2083.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 12, 2011.

*1083James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and William L. Sharwell, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Timothy A. Freeland, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appel-lee.

DAVIS, Judge.

D.C.K.L. challenges the trial court’s order withholding adjudication and placing her on juvenile probation for the delinquent act of criminal mischief, a second-degree misdemeanor. We affirm the disposition without further comment. The State has conceded that the written order of disposition fails to identify the degree of the offense. We therefore remand for the limited purpose of the entry of a corrected written disposition order that accurately reflects the degree of the offense for which her adjudication was withheld.

Affirmed and remanded for entry of a corrected order.

LaROSE and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, being, Ronald T. Linares, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ronald T. Linares                                              
|Ronald T. Linares                                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting and Financial Officer
|                                                                   
|March 31, 2010
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: April 26Published April 27, 2016
                        
                        By Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- This look around the Air Force takes us to Florida where a fallen Airman is honored, and to the Philippines where Airmen are conducting missions out of Clark Air Base. Hosted by Senior Airman Nicholas Koetz.
For previous episodes, click here for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- Battlefield Airmen pay tribute to fallen brother
- PACAF A-10s, HH-60s fly first air contingent missions in PhilippinesATAF 



Philippines 



Florida 



Clark AB 



memorial
Exhibit 21.1


                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             State of Incorporation
Name                                                                                      Assumed Names
------------------------------------------------------     ---------------------------    ----------------------------------
<S>                                                        <C>                            <C>
Noble Component Technologies, Inc.(1)                               Michigan
Monroe Engineering Products, Inc.                                   Michigan
Cass River Coatings, Inc.                                           Michigan              Vassar Industries
Skandy Corp.                                                        Michigan
Utilase Production Process, Inc.                                    Michigan
Noble Metal Forming, Inc.(2)                                        Michigan
Noble Metal Processing, Inc.(3)                                     Michigan
Noble Land Holdings, Inc.                                           Michigan
Noble Canada, Inc.                                              Ontario, Canada
Noble Canada II, Inc.                                           Ontario, Canada
Tiercon Plastics, Inc.(4)                                       Ontario, Canada
Tiercon Coatings, Inc.(5)                                       Ontario, Canada
H & H Steel Processing, Inc.(6)                                     Michigan
Noble Canada Holdings Limited                                 Nova Scotia, Canada
Noble Canada Holdings II Limited                              Nova Scotia, Canada
Noble Components & Systems, Inc.                                    Michigan
Noble Technologies, Inc.                                            Michigan
Noble Metal Processing Canada, Inc.                             Ontario, Canada
Tiercon Industries, Inc.                                        Ontario, Canada
</TABLE>

--------------------------
(1)      Formerly Prestolock International, Ltd.
(2)      Formerly DCT Component Systems, Inc.
(3)      Formerly Utilase, Inc.
(4)      Formerly Triam Plastics, Inc.
(5)      Formerly Centrifugal Coaters, Inc.
(6)      Formerly Utilase Blank Welding Technologies, Inc.
#### Roderick C. TIMMONS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-2018.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 31, 2011.

Roderick C. Timmons, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

BENTON, C.J., LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

Form 10-QSB/A
(Mark One)

   [X] Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities 
       Exchange Act of 1934

           For the Quarterly period ended September 30, 1997

                                  or

   [ ] Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
       Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File number 000-21907

Racom Systems, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in it charter)

Delaware                            84-1182875
---------------------------------   -----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction        (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)   Identification Number)

6080 Greenwood Village, CO
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
(Address of principal executive offices)

(303) 771-2077
(Issuer's telephone number)

     Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by 
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for 
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), 
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. 
Yes     No  X
    ---    ---

     There are 13,192,532 shares of the registrant's common stock, $.01 par 
value outstanding as of September 30, 1997.

<PAGE>

RACOM SYSTEMS, INC.
FORM 10-QSB/A
INDEX


Part II Other Information and Signatures

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

On March 12, 1997, the Company completed its Initial Public Offering ("IPO"). 
Gross proceeds from the IPO were $7,125,000. Net proceeds from the IPO were 
$5,942,568. Of the total offering expenses, $855,000 was paid directly to 
Spencer Edwards, Inc., the Underwriter, for expenses and commissions.

The Company used the proceeds from the IPO to repay outstanding debt and 
accrued interest of $2,126,103 ($999,410 to Intag International Limited, and 
$96,865 to Ramtron International Corporation); to repay outstanding accounts 
payable of $545,098 to related parties ($483,345 to Ramtron International 
Corporation) primarily for materials purchases; and to purchase and install 
machinery and equipment of $45,756. A reasonable estimate for the Company's 
use of proceeds related to sales and marketing activities is $537,141; for 
research and development activities is $573,527; and for working capital is 
$1,076,672. The balance of the proceeds of $1,038,271 is held as a temporary 
investment.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant 
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto 
duly authorized in Greenwood Village, Colorado on February 25, 1998.


Racom Systems, Inc.

/s/ Lillian V. Burkey
---------------------------
Lillian V. Burkey
Controller

/s/ Richard L. Horton
---------------------------
Richard L. Horton
President and Chief Executive Officer

February 25, 1998

Page 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                             OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                       ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


         Re:     Norwest Bank, as Trustee for Sequoia Trust 2 ("Issuer"),
                 Merrill Lynch Corporation ("Company"), Servicing Agreement
                 dated as of March 7, 1997 ("Agreement")

          Pursuant to the above Agreement, the Company hereby states:

         1.      A review of the activities of the Servicer during the 1997
calendar year and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under
the supervision of each of the undersigned officers, and

         2.      To the best of each such officer's knowledge, based on such
review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in
all material respects throughout such year.


Dated:  March 25, 1998

                                  Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation


                                  By: /s/ Linzy S. Banks
                                     Linzy S. Banks
                                     Vice President


                                  By: /s John M. Wheeler
                                     John M. Wheeler
                                     Senior Vice President
#### Crowdus Bros. *v.*B. H. Sanders & Co.

(No. 5942.)

Appeal from Eastland County.

R. B. Truly, counsel for appellants.

J. H. Calhoun and West & McG-own, counsel for appellees.

Opinion by

Will-son, J.

§ 461. *Contract construed to be executory; title to chattels does not pass under such contract; case stated.*Appellees sold to J. R. Tucker a car-load of oats, the contract of sale being as follows:

“Hillsborough, Texas, Dec. 23, 1886.

“We have this day sold to J. R. Tucker one car-load of oats, to be delivered in Cisco, at fifty-two cents per bushel, two hundred dollars to be paid by Orowdus Bros., with bill lading attached, balance secured by bill of sale on hay, bill of sale dated 23d day of Dec., 1886.

[Signed] “B. H. Sanders & Co.

“Signed and delivered in presence of W. ‘H. Hay.”

Thereafter Tucker sold said oats to appellants, and they took and appropriated the same. Appellees brought this suit to recover of appellants the value of said oats — $522.50 —and recovered judgment for said amount and costs. *Held:*The contract of sale from appellees to Tucker was executory. There still remained something to be done to complete the sale. The oats had to be de*561livered at Cisco, with bill of lading accompanying them, and appellants were to pay appellees $200. Until these conditions were performed by the parties respectively, the sale was incomplete, and the title to the oats did not pass to Tucker. If the oats had been destroyed before delivery at Cisco by appellees, the loss would have been theirs aud not Tucker’s. [Cleveland v. Williams, 29 Tex. 205; Allen v. Melton, 64 Tex. 219; 1 App. C. C. §§ 78, 1110; 2 App. C. C. §§ 152, 153.] When Tucker sold the oats to appellants they had not been delivered to him, nor had appellees been paid the $200 called for by the contract. Tucker, not having acquired title to the oats, could not convey title thereto to appellants, although appellants may have purchased from him in good faith, for a valuable consideration, and without notice that appellees owned the oats. [Dodd v. Arnold, 28 Tex. 97; Case v. Jennings, 17 Tex. 662; 1 App. C. C. § 1168.]

April 20, 1889.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

	

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 

Pursuant to Section 906 

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Tripos, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(b)	information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

	/s/ John P. McAlister
	John P. McAlister

	Chief Executive Officer

	August 8, 2003

 

	/s/ B. James Rubin
	B. James Rubin

	Chief Financial Officer

	August 8, 2003
#### Billy WARREN v. Robert KENNY and ABC Insurance Company.

No. 2011-C-1100.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company; Kenny Dr., Robert et al.; — Defendant (s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. E, No. 09-1431; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-1580.

Denied.

CLARK, J., would grant.
The Board of DirectorsPSS
World Medical, Inc.

|Re: | Registration
Statement File No. 333-114004 on Form S-3 and Nos. 33-80657, 33-90464, 333-15043,
333-64185, 33-85004, 33-97756, 33-99046, 33-97754, 333-30427, 333-50526, and 333-58272 on
Form S-8
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

With respect to the subject
registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report
dated November __, 2004 related to our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the
Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registration
statement prepared or certified by an accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an
accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

KPMG LLP

Jacksonville, FloridaNovember 8,
2004