alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 186 (Monday, September 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 59289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24045]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Removal of Listed Property

    Pursuant to section 60.15 of 36 CFR part 60, comments are being 
accepted on the following properties being considered for removal from 
the National Register of Historic Places. Comments may be forwarded by 
United States Postal Service, to the National Register of Historic 
Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., MS 2280, Washington, DC 
20240; by all other carriers, National Register of Historic Places, 
National Park Service, 1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 
20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed comments should be 
submitted by October 12, 2010.
    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

J. Paul Loether,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks 
Program.
    Request for REMOVAL has been made for the following resources:

OREGON

Multnomah County

Canterbury Castle, 2910 SW., Canterbury Ln., Portland, 87001509

TEXAS

Hunt County

Mayo Hall, Monroe and Stonewall Sts., Commerce, 03000727

[FR Doc. 2010-24045 Filed 9-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-51-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7545
WAYMARE BILLUPS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WALTER G. EDWARDS, JR., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-663-5-BO) Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 23, 2002 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Waymare Billups, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Waymare Billups appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U .S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. SeeBillups v. Edwards , No. CA-02-663-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Rashad CLINTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D11-1621.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

July 1, 2011.

Rashad Clinton, Carrabelle, pro se.

Pamela J. Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence in case no. 2009-CF-003324, in *753the Circuit Court in and for Lake County, Florida. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

EVANDER, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-25-1999
<CASH>                                            3,635
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    95,505
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                     105,153
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                215,851
<PP&E>                                          195,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  467,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            86,997
<BONDS>                                           8,615
<COMMON>                                        334,896
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    467,935
<SALES>                                         370,741
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                370,741
<CGS>                                           249,167
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   340,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3,285
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  25,566
<INCOME-TAX>                                      9,488
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              16,078
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     16,078
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.83
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited consolidated financial statements of McLeodUSA Incorporated and
subsidiaries for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         415,343
<SECURITIES>                                   278,676
<RECEIVABLES>                                  196,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,534
<INVENTORY>                                     19,670
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               974,218
<PP&E>                                         920,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                  91,590
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,836,380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          234,027
<BONDS>                                      1,776,475
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           744
<OTHER-SE>                                     784,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,836,380
<SALES>                                        181,109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               181,109
<CGS>                                           92,459
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,459
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               110,870
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,051
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (47,476)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (47,476)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (47,476)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.72)
        

</TABLE>
EX-33.2


REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the "Asserting Party"), an
indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc, is responsible for assessing compliance
as of December 31, 2013, and for the period from January 1, 2013 through
December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth
in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii),
(d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of Federal Regulations
applicable to the Asserting Party (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The
servicing activities covered by this report include all loans for commercial
mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Asserting Party served as the
commercial tax service provider (the "Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of
December 31, 2013, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
taken as a whole.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2013, and for the Reporting
Period.

CORELOGIC COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.


/s/ Vicki Chenault
Vicki Chenault,
Senior Vice President
February 14, 2014


Page 1 of 1
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1138 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 

at 306 East Main Street in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, as the 

‘‘J. Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. BUTTERFIELD (for himself, Mr. COBLE, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, 

Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. ETHERIDGE, Mr. WATT, Mrs. 

MYRICK, Mr. HAYES, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. MILLER of North Carolina, 

Ms. FOXX, Mr. MCHENRY, and Mr. SHULER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 306 East Main Street in Elizabeth 

City, North Carolina, as the ‘‘J. Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse 

5 located at 306 East Main Street in Elizabeth City, North 

6 Carolina, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘J. Hermstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1138 IH

1 bert W. Small Federal Building and United States Court2 house’’. 

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

6 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec7 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘J. Herbert 

8 W. Small Federal Building and United States Court9 house’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
#### Christopher L. BINNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D10-1812.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Jan. 28, 2011.

*383Christopher L. Binney, Crawfordville, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

SAWAYA, J.

Appellant Christopher L. Binney (“Bin-ney”) was convicted of aggravated battery causing great bodily harm, enhanced to a first-degree felony by the use of a firearm. He was sentenced in accordance with his plea to fifteen years in prison as a prison releasee reoffender. On April 1, 2010, he filed a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, enumerating seven grounds for relief. The lower court summarily denied the motion. Of the numerous assertions of error raised by Bin-ney, we believe that four warrant reversal and remand for further proceedings.

*384First, Binney contends that he does not qualify for sentencing as a prison release reoffender (“PRR”) and his sentence is therefore illegal. We reverse the order denying relief and remand for attachment of those portions of the record that conclusively establish that Binney qualifies for PRR sentencing or for resentencing to remove the PRR designation. *Williamson v. State,*988 So.2d 1240, 1242 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

Second, Binney contends that he received ineffective assistance ■ of counsel because of trial counsel’s failure to inform him that the State’s “key” eyewitness, James Merrill, Jr., had testified at his deposition that he had not, in fact, witnessed the attack that formed the basis of Binney’s charges. Third, Binney claims that his plea was obtained by the production of a “falsified” scoresheet, which indicated that he could receive forty years in the Department of Corrections were he to go to trial. As to these two claims, we reverse the order denying relief and remand this case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing or the attachment of documents that conclusively refute these claims.

Fourth, Binney claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failure to advise him of an insanity defense. This claim is facially insufficient because Binney failed to allege that he was actually insane when the offense was committed and failed to attach corroborating evidence. *See Luckey v. State,*979 So.2d 353 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); *Gillis v. State,*807 So.2d 204 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); *Baker v. State,*404 So.2d 1151 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). It is not apparent that these defects cannot be corrected, however, so Binney is entitled to the opportunity to replead this claim. *See Luckey,*979 So.2d at 355 (citing *Spera v. State,*971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007)).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

MONACO, C.J. and LAWSON, J., concur.
#### Henry Gene WASHINGTON and John Henry Washington, on behalf of Henry Gene Washington v. Mike Miles McCAULEY, Steve Kent Trucking, Inc., and Greenwich Insurance Company.

No. 2011-C-0578.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2011.

In re Washington, John; Washington, Mae Francis; —Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Desoto, 42nd Judicial District Court Div. *116B, No. 67,488; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,916-CA.

Denied.
Order entered July 9, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00432-CV

ANWAR KAZI, ET AL., Appellants

V.

MOHAMMAD SOHAIL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-09713

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ July 7, 2021 motion for an extension of time 

to file their brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to 

July 28, 2021.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 85 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7128-S7129]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 SENATE RESOLUTION 123--RELATING TO THE RETIREMENT OF GERALD A. HACKETT

  Mr. DOLE (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
resolution; which was considered and agreed to:

                              S. Res. 123

       Whereas Gerald A. Hackett will retire from the United 
     States Senate after 33 years of service, the last 29 years as 
     Executive Clerk;
       Whereas his dedication to the United States resulted in the 
     computerization of the nomination and treaty processes, and 
     the on-line publishing of the Executive Journal;
       Whereas he has performed the duties of his office with 
     remarkable diligence, perseverance, efficiency, and 
     intelligence;
       Whereas he has faithfully performed his duties serving all 
     Members of the Senate with great professional integrity and 
     dedication; and
       Whereas Gerald A. Hackett has earned the respect, 
     admiration and esteem of the United States Senate: Now, 
     therefore, be it [[Page S7129]] 
       Resolved, That the United States Senate commends Gerald A. 
     Hackett for his long, faithful, and exemplary service to his 
     country and to the Senate.
       Sec. 2. The Secretary shall transmit a copy of this 
     resolution to Gerald A. Hackett.
     

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 PACE to forge professional AirmenPublished March 12, 2015
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Joshua Strang
                        
                        
                        Air Education and Training Command Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Forging professional Airmen was the focus of Gen. Robin Rand, commander of Air Education and Training Command, as he officiated a ceremony March 11, formally recognizing the Profession of Arms Center of Excellence at Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph.The Air Force chief of staff’s program, PACE, is an initiative set forth in 2014 by then Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, which focuses on military professionalism.“The overriding purpose of PACE is to make our 695,000 Airmen better in execution of war fighting,” Rand said. “What we start today will become legendary for the Air Force.”Officially activated and assigned to AETC on March 2, PACE is focused on studies, analysis and assessment for command strategic priorities associated with Airman professionalism. The center is driven by four professionalism goals: inspire a strong commitment to the profession of arms, promote the right mindset to enhance effectiveness and trust, foster relationships that strengthen an environment of trust, and enhance a culture of shared identity, dignity and respect.“Our core values of integrity, service and excellence, and our mission of ‘fly, fight, and win,’ have to be connected,” Rand said. “That is what PACE will do.”Rand passed the PACE guidon to Col. Jeffrey Smith, signifying his assumption of command as the PACE director. Smith went on to say that professionalism and leading Airmen is a calling.“We need to lead our Airmen well,” Smith said. “We need to bring our people to a better state tomorrow than where we are today.”The primary audience of PACE is Air Force leaders at all levels. The center produces a number of Web-accessible products to assist leadership in communicating with their Airmen through a variety of forums. Products such as videos can be used in larger, open forums while handouts can be shared in smaller, informal meetings or during one-on-one feedback sessions.“The Air Force is our customer, and we are here for you,” Smith said. “I look forward to seeing what we can do together.”PACE is driven and committed to its vision of developing Airmen who do the right thing, the right way and for the right reason.“When their moment comes, and there will be a moment for every Airman when it is their time to do something that will change the world,” Rand said, “they will be ready.”For more information and to access their Web products, visit the PACEwebsite or engage with PACE through social media via their Twitter account at @ProfessionalAmn and their Facebook page.professional 



PACE 



Airmen
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of U.S. Restaurant Properties, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stacy M. Riffe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

/s/
Stacy M. Riffe

---

Stacy M. Riffe
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2003

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1319 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1319

  To authorize an additional use of the property containing the Mount 
   Olivet Cemetery in Salt Lake City, Utah, that was conveyed by the 
  United States to the Mount Olivet Cemetery Association in 1909, to 
   authorize the reconveyance of the property subject to certain use 
                 restrictions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2007

 Mr. Matheson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize an additional use of the property containing the Mount 
   Olivet Cemetery in Salt Lake City, Utah, that was conveyed by the 
  United States to the Mount Olivet Cemetery Association in 1909, to 
   authorize the reconveyance of the property subject to certain use 
                 restrictions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS ON PROPERTY CONVEYED TO 
              MOUNT OLIVET CEMETERY ASSOCIATION, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH.

    Notwithstanding the Act of January 23, 1909 (chapter 37, 35 Stat. 
589), the Mount Olivet Cemetery Association of Salt Lake City, Utah, 
may use all or a portion of the property conveyed by that Act, still 
owned by the Association as of the date of the enactment of this Act, 
and not used by the Association for cemetery purposes for the 
construction of a school and related educational and recreational 
purposes in addition to the purpose specified in that Act, and the 
property may be conveyed as authorized under State law subject to such 
modified use restrictions.
                                 <all>
```