alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 186 (Monday, September 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59275-59276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24139]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel, Member Conflict: Neuronal Channel Function and Dysfunction.
    Date: October 1, 2010.
    Time: 2:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Carol Hamelink, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 4192, MSC 7850, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 213-
9887, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bfd7ded2dad3d6d1dcffdccccd91d1d6d791d8d0c9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="620a030f070e0b0c01220111104c0c0b0a4c050d14">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 59276]]


    Dated: September 20, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-24139 Filed 9-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-0XLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MRO Software, Inc., (the
"Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned President & Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President of
Finance & Administration, CFO & Treasurer of the Company, certifies, to the best
knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.                     /s/   Peter J. Rice
-----------------------------------            ---------------------------------
Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.                         Peter J. Rice
President & Chief Executive Officer            Executive Vice President, Finance
Date: May 14, 2004                             & Administration, CFO & Treasurer
                                               Date: May 14, 2004
583 A.2d 307

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALAN ROGERS.

January 23, 1990.

Cross-petition for certification granted. (See 236 *N.J.Super.*378, 565 A.2d 1128)
#### Vibert COLLINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D11-1776.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 24, 2011.

Vibert Collins, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, LAGOA, and EMAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Hernandez v. State,*61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.2
 AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO THE SECOND AMENDED
AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
OF
WINN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
  WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 Exhibit 1
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 WINSTON HOTELS, INC.,
as General PartnerBy:
    
    /s/ Brent V. WestName:
    
    Brent V. WestTitle:
    
    Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
  
 Common Units
 Partner and
    
    Partnership
    
    PercentageAddress
    
    Units
    
    InterestGeneral Partner:Winston Hotels, Inc.
    
    
    29,191,839
    
    
    
    95.72
    %2626 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 200Raleigh, NC 27608Limited Partners:Charles M. WinstonWinston Hotels, Inc.
    
    
    105,643
    
    
    
    0.35
    %2209 Century DriveRaleigh, NC 27612Cary Suites, Inc.
    
    
    1,019,524
    
    
    
    3.34
    %2209 Century DriveRaleigh, NC 27612WJS Associates-Perimeter II, Inc.
    
    
    109,516
    
    
    
    0.36
    %2209 Century DriveRaleigh, NC 27612Hubbard Realty of Winston-Salem, Inc.
    
    
    63,797
    
    
    
    0.21
    %85 South Stratford Rd.Winston-Salem, NC 2710330,490,319
    
    
    
    100.00
    %
 Series B Preferred Units
 PercentagePartner and Address
    
    Partnership Units
    
    InterestWinston Hotels, Inc.
    
    
    3,680,000
    
    
    
    100
    %2626 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 200Raleigh, NC 27608
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Oct. 7Published Oct. 7, 2016
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --** On this look around the Air Force, promotion statistics are released, the U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa commander emphasizes the importance of a well-trained force, and a F-16 Fighting Falcon fighter pilot’s remains are returned home. Hosted by Airman 1st Class Cory Kuttler.For previous episodes, click here.Related links:AF releases 2016 promotion statistics by AFSCRemains of fighter pilot hero return home after 10 yearsAFTV 



USAFE – AFAFRICA 



F-16 Fighting Falcon 



promotion
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             485
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   90,340
<ALLOWANCES>                                    55,260
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          11,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,091
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           278
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,402
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,669
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,768
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,462
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (497)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (497)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (497)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.02)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John P. McAlister, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tripos, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

	a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	c)	disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 8, 2003

 

     /s/ John P. McAlister

     John P. McAlister 

     Chief Executive Officer
#### Robert A. STOK and Abe Stok, Appellants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee, Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc., d/b/a Homeq Servicing Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Appellee.

No. 3D09-1680.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 25, 2009.

Robert A. Stok, in proper person.

Broad and Cassel and Daniel A. Miller, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Before WELLS, SHEPHERD, and SALTER, JJ.

WELLS, Judge.

Pursuant Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv) (providing that appeals to the district courts of appeal of non-final orders, while limited, include those that determine “the entitlement of a *831party to arbitration”), we review the order under appeal and affirm.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 146 

To provide Capitol-flown flags to the families of deceased law enforcement 

officers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide Capitol-flown flags to the families of deceased 

law enforcement officers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Law Enforcement Offi5 cers Flag Memorial Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CAPITOL-FLOWN FLAGS FOR FAMILIES OF DE7 CEASED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS. 

8 (a) AUTHORITY.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—The family of a deceased law 

10 enforcement officer may request, and the Attorney 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 146 IH

1 General shall provide to such family, a Capitol-flown 

2 flag, which shall be supplied to the Attorney General 

3 by the Architect of the Capitol. The family shall pay 

4 the cost of such flag, including shipping. 

5 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Paragraph (1) shall 

6 take effect on the date on which the Attorney Gen7 eral establishes the procedure required by subsection 

8 (b). 

9 (b) PROCEDURE.—Not later than 180 days after the 

10 date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall 

11 establish a procedure (including any appropriate forms) 

12 by which the family of a deceased law enforcement officer 

13 may request, and provide sufficient information to deter14 mine such officer’s eligibility for, a Capitol-flown flag. 

15 (c) APPLICABILITY.—This Act shall only apply to a 

16 deceased law enforcement officer who died on or after the 

17 date of enactment of this Act. 

18 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act— 

19 (1) the term ‘‘Capitol-flown flag’’ means a 

20 United States flag flown over the United States 

21 Capitol in honor of the deceased law enforcement of22 ficer for whom such flag is requested; and 

23 (2) the term ‘‘deceased law enforcement officer’’ 

24 means a person who was charged with protecting 

25 public safety, who was authorized to make arrests by 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 146 IH

1 a Federal, State, or local law enforcement agency, 

2 and who died while employed by such an agency or 

3 after retiring in good standing from such an agency. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

EXHIBIT 10(a)  


  
 

  [SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP LETTERHEAD]  
  


December 31, 2003 


Board
of Directors

Protective Life Insurance Company

2801 Highway 280 South

Birmingham, Alabama 35223 


Directors:



        We
hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters" in the statement of additional information filed as part of post-effective amendment number 9 to the
registration statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-68551) filed by Protective Life Insurance Company and Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In
giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933. 



	 	 	Sincerely,
	

 	
 	
SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	
/S/ DAVID S. GOLDSTEIN

	 	 	 	 	David S. Goldstein











QuickLinks


[SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP LETTERHEAD]
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 780(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: December 12, 2005
    /s/ Theodore AbajianTheodore AbajianExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
583 A.2d 331

#### SUSAN ANN HANNA AND HOMING CORP., ETC. v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF EATONTOWN.

February 27, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fentura Financial, Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald L. Grill, Chief Executive Officer of Fentura FinancialInc. certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) the Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.        Dated:  May 11, 2007 /s/ Donald L. Grill   Donald L. Grill   Chief Executive Officer
#### Leduan DIAZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D10-2563.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 25, 2011.

Matthew E. Ladd; Pozo, Goldstein & Gomez, and Maggie Arias; Robbins, Tun-key, Ross, Amsel, Raben and Waxman, and Benjamin Waxman, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Timothy R.M. Thomas, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Florida Immigration Advocacy Center, and Tania Galloni; Immigration Clinic, University of Miami School of Law, and Rebecca Sharpless, Immigration Clinic, St. Thomas University School of Law, and Michael Vastine, for American Immigration Lawyers Association, South Florida Chapter, as Amicus Curiae; Sabrina Vora-Puglisi, and Sonya Rudenstein (Gaines-ville), and Michael Ufferman (Tallahassee), for The Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the Miami Chapter of the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, as amicus curiae.

Before WELLS, CORTIÑAS, and LAGOA, JJ.

*ON MOTION FOR REHEARING*

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant, Leduan Diaz, seeks rehearing following the issuance of our opinion on October 20, 2010. We grant rehearing, *1080withdraw our prior opinion, and substitute this opinion in its place.

Diaz appeals the denial of his postcon-viction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.850, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel due to trial counsel’s failure to advise him that accepting a plea would subject him to deportation. We affirm based on *Hernandez v. State,*61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), wherein this Court: (a) citing *Padilla v. Kentucky,*— U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), found that the trial court’s deportation warning under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(c)(8) did not cure the prejudice arising from defense counsel’s failure to warn that accepting a plea would result in the defendant’s mandatory deportation; (b) certified conflict with *Flores v. State,*57 So.3d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) on this legal question; and (c) found that *Padilla*had no retroactive effect and thus did not apply to pleas taken before *Padilla*was announced, certifying a question of great public importance to the Florida Supreme Court.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 12.1

                               Aurora Foods Inc.
                      Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                            (dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Years Ended
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                  December 31,   December 27,
                                                      1998           1997
                                                  ------------   ------------
<S>                                               <C>            <C>
(Loss) income before income taxes                 $    (21,860)  $      2,014
Fixed charges:
Interest expense                                        65,081         18,393
Amortization of deferred financing expense               1,872          3,059
Interest portion of rentals                                347             33
                                                  ------------   ------------
Earnings available for fixed charges              $     45,440   $     23,499
                                                  ============   ============

Fixed charges:
Interest expense                                        65,081         18,393
Amortization of deferred financing expense               1,872          3,059
Interest portion of rentals                                347             33
                                                  ------------   ------------ 
Fixed charges                                     $     67,300   $     21,485
                                                  ============   ============ 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        0.68           1.09
                                                  ============   ============
</TABLE>


(1)  For the purpose of determining the ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
     earnings consist of income before income taxes and fixed charges. Fixed
     charges consist of interest expense, whether expensed or capitalized,
     including amortization of deferred financing expense and the portion (one-
     third) of rental expense that management believes is representative of the
     interest component of rent expense.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PABLO ROLON.

February 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.