alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1 

 

**Certifications**

 

I, J.A. Cardwell, Sr., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Petro Financial Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 13, 2003 

/s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.

    (J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)

    President and Director 

 

1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                             McLEODUSA INCORPORATED

                      COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
                  (AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Three Months Ended    Nine Months Ended
                                                                      September 30,         September 30,
                                                                   --------------------  -------------------
                                                                     1999       1998       1999       1998
                                                                   ---------  ---------  ---------  --------
<S>                                                                <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Computation of weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding:
Common shares, Class A, outstanding at the
 beginning of the period (A).....................................     150.4      125.8      127.4     123.6
Common shares, Class B, outstanding at the
 beginning of the period (B).....................................       ---        ---        ---       ---
Weighted average number of shares issued
 during the period (A)...........................................       2.3        0.1       17.6       1.6
                                                                     ------     ------    -------    ------
Weighted average number of common shares.........................     152.7      125.9      145.0     125.2
                                                                     ======     ======    =======    ======
Net loss applicable to common shares.............................    $(62.5)    $(33.0)   $(171.4)   $(93.1)
                                                                     ======     ======    =======    ======
Loss per common share............................................    $(0.41)    $(0.26)   $ (1.18)   $(0.74)
                                                                     ======     ======    =======    ======
</TABLE>

(A) All shares have been adjusted to give effect to the two-for-one stock split
    effected in the form of a stock dividend effective July 26, 1999.

(B) The Class B common stock, $.01 par value per share is convertible on a one-
    for-one basis at any time at the option of the holder into Class A common
    stock.  As of September 30, 1999, all shares of Class B common stock have
    been converted into shares of Class A common stock.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1
                                                                    ------------
                                                                                

                         WESTERN TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT


August 7, 1997


Mr. John Brintnall
Vice President of Finance & CFO
Integ Incorporated
2800 Patton Road
St. Paul, MN  55113

Re:  Loan Agreement Between Integ (Borrower) and Venture Lending & Leasing, Inc.
(Lender), Dated March 27, 1996

Dear John:

This letter will outline our understanding with respect to any Loan to be funded
by Lender after the date of this letter and during the period of Borrower's
redesign of their LifeGuide System.  Lender will advance 50% against Equipment
submitted by Borrower and approved by Lender up to the date when Borrower issues
a press release which indicates that its in-house testing of the LifeGuide
System has resulted in performance which should allow the Borrower to initiate
within 90 days, human clinical trials, the results of which will be used in the
Borrower's 510(k) submission to the FDA.  Subsequent to the date of the press
release, all future Loans will be made in accordance with the Loan Agreement and
the Lender will advance the balance of any Loans that were partially funded
during the period covered by this letter.


Sincerely,

/s/  Ronald W. Swenson


Agreed to by Integ, Incorporated:

By:  /s/  John R. Brintnall

Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 11, 1997
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Waypoint Financial Corp.
(the "Company") for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
H. Moss, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.



/s/ James H. Moss
-----------------
James H. Moss,
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



November 14, 2003






                                       96
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted for Union
National Bancorp's Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       7,094,831
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,892
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            10,420,705
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 73,431,559
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      17,838,719
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    160,939,290
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,749,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             275,773,191
<DEPOSITS>                                 216,721,057
<SHORT-TERM>                                16,601,796
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,310,069
<LONG-TERM>                                 20,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,794
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,123,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             275,773,191
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,237,219
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,383,946
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               354,256
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,975,421
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,048,677
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,669,176
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,306,245
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  126,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              21,281
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,042,860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,887,482
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,316,253
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.18
<LOANS-NON>                                    326,845
<LOANS-PAST>                                   487,750
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,819,753
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,793,112
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  218,439
<RECOVERIES>                                    48,438
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,749,111
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,749,111
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### G & H PARKER CONSTRUCTION INC., Appellant, v. Richard CAPRIGLIONE, Appellee.

No. 4D09-3303.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 27, 2011.

Andrew Degraffenreidt, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee,*377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

WARNER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1454 

To create 4 new permanent judgeships for the eastern district of California, 

to provide for an additional place of holding court in the eastern district 

of California, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2007 

Mr. MCCARTHY of California (for himself and Mr. HERGER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To create 4 new permanent judgeships for the eastern district of California, to provide for an additional place 

of holding court in the eastern district of California, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NEW JUDGESHIPS FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF 

4 CALIFORNIA. 

5 (a) NEW APPOINTMENTS.—The President shall ap6 point, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 

7 4 additional district judges for the eastern district of Cali8 fornia. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1454 IH

1 (b) TABLE.—In order that the table contained in sec2 tion 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, reflects the 

3 total number of permanent district judgeships authorized 

4 by virtue of subsection (a) of this section, such table is 

5 amended by striking the item relating to California and 

6 inserting the following: 

‘‘California 

Northern ............................................................................................ 14

Eastern ............................................................................................... 10

Central ............................................................................................... 27

Southern ............................................................................................. 13’’. 

7 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

8 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 

9 necessary to carry out this section, including such sums 

10 as may be necessary to provide appropriate space and fa11 cilities for the judicial positions created by this section. 

12 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL PLACE OF HOLDING COURT; DESIGNA13 TION OF JUDGES. 

14 (a) EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.—Section 

15 84(b) of title 28, United States Code, is amended in the 

16 second sentence by inserting ‘‘Bakersfield,’’ after ‘‘shall 

17 be held at’’. 

18 (b) DESIGNATION OF JUDGES.— 

19 (1) BAKERSFIELD.—The chief judge of the 

20 eastern district of California shall designate 1 dis21 trict judge whose official duty station shall be in Ba22 kersfield, California and who shall hold court for 

23 such district in Bakersfield, California. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HR 1454 IH

1 (2) REDDING.—The chief judge of the eastern 

2 district of California shall designate another district 

3 judge whose official duty station shall be in Redding, 

4 California and who shall hold court for such district 

5 in Redding, California. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF VARI-LITE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

|NAME                                            |  | JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION |  | OWNER                          
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|VLPS Lighting Services, Inc.                    |  | Delaware                      |  | Vari-Lite International, Inc.  
|Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.                 |  | United Kingdom                |  | Vari-Lite International, Inc.  
|Vari-Lite Europe, Ltd.                          |  | United Kingdom                |  | Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.
|Theatre Projects Lighting Services, Ltd.        |  | United Kingdom                |  | Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.
|B. S. Ltd.                                      |  | United Kingdom                |  | Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.
|Irideon, Ltd.                                   |  | United Kingdom                |  | Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.
|Vari-Lite Production Services Europe, NV        |  | Belgium                       |  | Vari-Lite International, Inc.  
|Vari-Lite Asia, Inc.                            |  | Japan                         |  | Vari-Lite International, Inc.  
|Vari-Lite Production Services Hong Kong Limited |  | Hong Kong                     |  | Vari-Lite International, Inc.  
|Vari-Lite Hong Kong, Ltd.                       |  | Hong Kong                     |  | Vari-Lite International, Inc.  

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

               COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                       March 25, 1997              March 25, 1996
                                                       --------------              --------------

<S>                                                    <C>                          <C>        
Net Income                                             $ 7,242,000                  $ 6,938,000



Shares used to compute
   earnings per share                                   19,222,200                   19,218,000


Earnings Per Share                                           $0.38                        $0.36



Shares used to compute
   earnings per share including
   common stock equivalents - Primary Basis             19,381,039                   19,398,927


Primary Earnings Per Share                                   $0.37                        $0.36



Shares used to compute
   earnings per share including
   common stock equivalents - Fully Diluted Basis       19,382,377                   19,398,927


Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share                             $0.37                        $0.36

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17-882V 

Filed: March 23, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

DEANNE DOANE, 

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Michael G. McLaren, Black McLaren Jones Ryland & Griffee, P.C., Memphis, TN, for 

petitioner.

Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On June 28, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine 

Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury relate to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) following receipt of her September 19, 2016 influenza (“flu”) 

vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the 

Office of Special Masters.

On March 21, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent “believes that petitioner’s medical course is consistent 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
with SIRVA as defined on the Vaccine Injury Table. Specifically, petitioner had no recent 

history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder, pain occurred within 48 

hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination, pain was limited to the shoulder 

where the vaccine was administered, and no other condition or abnormality, such as 

brachial neuritis, has been identified to explain petitioner’s shoulder pain.” Id. at 4. 

Respondent further agrees that that petitioner suffered residual effects of her condition 

for more than six months and that all legal prerequisites to compensation under the 

Vaccine Act have been satisfied. Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

 Chief Special Master
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                       SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

               CALCULATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                       ----------------------------------------------------
                                                        1999        1998       1997       1996       1995
                                                       -------    --------    -------    -------    -------
<S>                                                    <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>
Income before extraordinary items...................   $59,760    $ 66,475    $31,934    $21,187    $15,051
Interest:
    Expense incurred................................    37,282      32,550     20,902     16,113     13,715
    Amortization of deferred financing costs........       992         956      1,057      1,025      1,087
    Rental fixed charges............................       159         133        115        124        134
                                                       -------    --------    -------    -------    -------
    Total...........................................   $98,193    $100,114    $54,008    $38,449    $29,987
                                                       =======    ========    =======    =======    =======

Fixed charges:
    Interest expense................................   $37,282    $ 32,550    $20,902    $16,113    $13,715
    Interest capitalized............................     7,888       6,143      5,876      4,266      3,110
    Dividends to preferred unitholders in                6,698          --         --         --         --
    Operating Partnership...........................
    Rental fixed charges............................       159         133        115        124        134
    Amortization of deferred financing costs
                                                           992         956      1,057      1,025      1,087
                                                       -------    --------    -------    -------    -------
      Total.........................................   $53,019    $ 39,782    $27,950    $21,528    $18,046
                                                       =======    ========    =======    =======    =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        1.85        2.52       1.93       1.79       1.66
                                                       =======    ========    =======    =======    =======
</TABLE>
#### HNTB HOLDINGS, LTD., etc., et al., Appellants, v. Lazaro DENIS, Appellee.

No. 3D12-188.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 5, 2012.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 1, 2012.

Restani, Dittmar & Hauser, and Helen Ann Hauser, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Scott Jay Feder, Miami-Dade, for appel-lee.

Before SHEPHERD, SALTER and EMAS, JJ.

*1198PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See ITT Hartford Ins. Co. of the Se. v. Owens,*816 So.2d 572 (Fla.2002); *Sanchez v. Hernandez,*971 So.2d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).