alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 5595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2307]

[[Page 5595]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreements are 
available through the Commission's Web site (http://www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or 
[email protected].
    Agreement No.: 201112-002.
    Title: Lease and Operating Agreement between Philadelphia Regional 
Port Authority and Kinder Morgan Liquids Terminals LLC.
    Parties: Philadelphia Regional Port Authority and Kinder Morgan 
Liquids Terminals, LLC.
    Filing Party: Paul D. Coleman, Esq.; Hoppel, Mayer & Coleman; 1050 
Connecticut Ave., NW., 10th Floor; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment restates the lease to provide a new initial 
term until December 31, 2019, with five yearly renewal periods; set new 
rent terms; and makes other miscellaneous changes.

    Agreement No.: 201118-002.
    Title: Lease and Operating Agreement between Philadelphia Regional 
Port Authority and Kinder Morgan Linquest Terminals LLC.
    Parties: Philadelphia Regional Port Authority and Penn Warehousing 
and Distribution, Inc.
    Filing Party: Paul D. Coleman, Esq.; Hoppel, Mayer & Coleman; 1050 
Connecticut Ave. NW., 10th Floor; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment defines the lease year, clarifies the 
dockage fee, allows a credit to the Lessee if dockage fees collected 
reach a certain level, and make other miscellaneous changes.

    Dated: January 29, 2010.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-2307 Filed 2-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```
[No. 59466-0.

Department Two.

November 25, 1992.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jaysen O.K. Ryland, *Appellant.*

*326
      *Andrew P. Zinner*of *Washington Appellate Defender Association,*for appellant.

*Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney,*and *Theresa Fricke, Senior Prosecuting Attorney,*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

A Department of this court unanimously adopts the reasoning of the dissent in *State v. Ryland,*65 Wn. App. 806, 810, 829 P.2d 806 (1992) (Agid, J., dissenting). Accordingly, the case is remanded to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether the police officer reasonably believed the houseguest had authority to consent to entry. The case is thereafter remanded to the Court of Appeals, Division One, for resolution.

Reconsideration denied December 30, 1992.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,481
<SECURITIES>                                   211,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,394,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,560,713
<PP&E>                                         686,784
<DEPRECIATION>                                (49,722)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,931,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,313,105
<BONDS>                                     10,781,667
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  9,458,000
<COMMON>                                     9,070,722
<OTHER-SE>                                   (413,238)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,931,304
<SALES>                                      2,880,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,314,413
<CGS>                                          120,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  120,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,329,975
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             655,875
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,328,563
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (530,173)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   798,390
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .046
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .046
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

               SUBSIDIARIES OF SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                               STATE OF ORGANIZATION
------------------                               ---------------------
Summit Management Company                              Maryland
Summit Apartment Builders, Inc.                         Florida
Home Ownership Made Easy, LLC                          Delaware
Stony Point/Summit, LLC                             North Carolina
Summit/Belmont, LLC                                 North Carolina
Henderson/McGuire, LLC                              North Carolina
McGregor/McGuire, LLC                               North Carolina
Portofino Place, Ltd.                                   Florida
Foxcroft East Associates                            North Carolina
Summit Southwest, L.P.                                 Delaware
Summit Valley Brook, LLC                               Delaware
Summit Shiloh, LLC                                      Georgia
Summit Sweetwater, LLC                                  Georgia
Summit Grandview, LLC                               North Carolina
Summit Grand Parc, LLC                                 Delaware
Summit Roosevelt, LLC                                  Delaware
PAPEC Silo Creek, LLC                                  Delaware
Summit Brickellview, LLC                               Delaware
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1199 

To extend the grant program for drug-endangered children. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2007 

Mr. CARDOZA (for himself, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, and Ms. HOOLEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To extend the grant program for drug-endangered children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drug Endangered 

5 Children Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DRUG-ENDANGERED CHILDREN GRANT PROGRAM 

7 EXTENDED. 

8 Section 755(c) of the USA PATRIOT Improvement 

9 and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 3797cc–2(c)) 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1199 IH

1 is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2006 and 2007’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2008 and 2009’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Richard Baron, Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Animas Corporation,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Animas Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of Animas Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report;
4. Animas Corporation’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for Animas Corporation and have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to Animas Corporation, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; and  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of Animas Corporation’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  disclosed in this annual report any change in Animas Corporation’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during AnimasCorporation’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, Animas Corporation’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
5. Animas Corporation’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Animas Corporation’s auditors and theaudit committee of Animas Corporation’s board of directors:
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likelyto adversely affect Animas Corporation’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in Animas Corporation’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: March 31, 2005         By:                                /s/ Richard Baron    Richard Baron    Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Silverado  Financial,  Inc, a Nevada
corporation  (the  "Company"),  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert P. Atwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ John E. Hartman
----------------------------------------
    John E. Hartman
    Chief Executive Officer
    April 11, 2005
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Marc Anthony DIAZ, Appellee.

No. 5D10-3710.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 16, 2011.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appel-lee.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See *State v. Diaz,*850 So.2d 435 (Fla.2003).

ORFINGER, C.J., COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 8.1****List of Significant Subsidiaries of United Microelectronics Corporation**         **Percentage of Ownership****Company** **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** **as of December 31, 2006**     UMC Group (USA) California, USA 100.00%United Microelectronics (Europe) B.V. The Netherlands 100.00%UMC Capital Corporation Cayman Islands 100.00%United Microelectronics Corp. (Samoa) Samoa 100.00%TLC Capital Co., Ltd Taiwan, ROC 100.00%UMCi Ltd. Singapore 100.00%Fortune Venture Capital Corporation Taiwan, ROC   99.99%United Microdisplay Optronics Corp. Taiwan, ROC   85.24%UMC Japan Japan   50.09%Unitruth Investment Corp. Taiwan, ROC 100.00%UMC Capital (USA) California, USA 100.00%ECP VITA Ltd. British Virgin Islands 100.00%UMO (HK) Limited Hong Kong 100.00%
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EUROTECH,
LTD. BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                          DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                          2
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   6
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                8
<PP&E>                                                         41
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  9
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 76
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1,942
<BONDS>                                                     6,970
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                        5
<OTHER-SE>                                                 (8,840)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   76
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                0
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            1,039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          4,796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (7,814)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (7,814)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (7,814)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (0.40)
        


</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1417 

To prohibit the closure of Walter Reed Army Medical Center notwithstanding 

the 2005 recommendations of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment 

Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2007 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the closure of Walter Reed Army Medical Center 

notwithstanding the 2005 recommendations of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CLOSURE OF WALTER REED 

4 ARMY MEDICAL CENTER. 

5 Notwithstanding section 2904(a)(5) of the Defense 

6 Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title 

7 XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and 

8 the recommendations of the Defense Base Closure and Re9 alignment Commission contained in the report transmitted 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1417 IH

1 to Congress on September 15, 2005, under section 

2 2903(e) of such Act, the Secretary of Defense shall not 

3 close Walter Reed Army Medical Center. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### CITY OF BATON ROUGE, Parish of East Baton Rouge and the Department of Public Works v. Anthony DOUGLAS and the Personnel Board of the City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge.

No. 2006-C-0675.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Anthony Douglas; — Defendant; Applying for a Motion to Enforce this court’s decision of June 2, 2006 wherein it denied plaintiffs’ writ application, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. D, Nos. 466,636; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2004 CA 1448.

Denied.
**Exhibit32**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

 

# In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlternativeResources Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based ontheir knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for theperiods covered in the Report.

 

 

 

 

 

 
| /s/ George W. Watts                      |   |                  |
|------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------|
| George W. Watts, Chief Executive Officer |   | Date: August 14, 2003 |
|                                     |   |                  |
|                                     |   |                  |
| /s/ Steven Purcell                       |   |                  |
| Steven Purcell, Chief Financial Officer  |   | Date: August 14, 2003 |

 

----
News United States Air Force
 B-2s conduct deployment to Indo-Asia-PacificPublished March 10, 2016
                        
                        By U.S. Strategic Command Public Affairs
                **OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE, Neb. (AFNS) --**
                Three B-2 Spirits deployed from Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, to the U.S. Pacific Command area of operations March 8.While in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region, the B-2s will integrate and conduct training with ally and partner air forces, and conduct a radio communications check with a U.S. air operations center.This deployment will ensure bomber crews maintain a high state of readiness and crew proficiency, and will provide opportunities to integrate capabilities with key regional partners.“These flights ensure we remain ready to deter strategic attack, now and into the future, and are one of the many ways the U.S. demonstrates its commitment to security and stability across the globe,” said Adm. Cecil D. Haney, U.S. Strategic Command commander. “Additionally, these efforts provide invaluable opportunities to build relationships and interoperability between the U.S. and ally and partner forces.”“Strategic bomber deployments ensure our ability to project power at a time and place of our choosing and develop strong interoperability with our regional allies and partners,” said Gen. Lori J. Robinson, Pacific Air Forces commander. “Recent events demonstrate the continued need to provide consistent and credible air power throughout the Indo-Asia-Pacific region. Our ability to demonstrate credible combat power while training and interoperating with our network of like-minded partner nations is vitally important.”U.S. Strategic Command routinely demonstrates its capability to command, control and conduct global bomber missions, most recently by deploying B-52 Stratofortresses into the U.S. European Command area of responsibility earlier this month.USSTRATCOM bombers regularly rotate through the Indo-Asia-Pacific to conduct USPACOM-led air operations, providing leaders with deterrent options to maintain regional stability.One of nine Defense Department unified combatant commands, USSTRATCOM has global strategic missions, assigned through the Unified Command Plan, which include strategic deterrence; space operations; cyberspace operations; joint electronic warfare; global strike; missile defense; intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance; combating weapons of mass destruction; and analysis and targeting.B-2 



USSTRATCOM 



USPACOM 



Indo-Asia-Pacific 



deployment Related Links
        B-2 Spirit
                                Dec. 16, 2015
                                The B-2 Spirit is a multi-role bomber capable of delivering both conventional and nuclear munitions. A dramatic leap forward in technology, the B-2 brings massive firepower to bear, in a short time, anywhere on the globe through previously impenetrable defenses.
762 A.2d 1085

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Cyrus R. SANDERS, Jr., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued May 2, 2000.

Decided Dec. 22, 2000.

Theodore Hinckley, Helen A. Stolinas, Public Defender’s Office, for Cyrus R. Sanders, Jr.

George P. Skumanick, Special Deputy Atty. Gen., for Com.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*523
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
#### David LOWE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-3159.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 8, 2010.

David Lowe, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking a belated appeal of the order of September 21, 2009, denying petitioner’s motion for postconviction relief and amended motion for postconviction relief in Leon County Circuit Court case number 2005-CF-4550, is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall be furnished to the clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal *60in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(5)(D).

PADOVANO, ROBERTS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.