alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 17.3

Robert K. Burgess

1015 N. Glengarry Road

Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48301

February 26, 2008

Mr. Robert J. Skandalaris

Chairman

Noble International, Ltd.

840 West Long Lake Road, Suite 601

Troy, Ml 48098

Dear Bob:

I am writing this letter to inform you that I have decided to resign my position as a member of the Board of Directors of Noble International, Ltd. as of
February 26, 2008. This resignation also includes my position on all committees and any subsidiaries.

Although I have been a Board
member for a relatively short time, I have enjoyed my association with other members of the Board and management.

Please inform all other
Board members and interested parties of my resignation. I wish you and my other Board colleagues the best in all future endeavors.



Sincerely,LOGORobert K. Burgess




|CC: | Mr. Michael C. Azar, Esq.
|--- | -------------------------

Mr. Jean-Francois Crancee

Mr. Ronald E. Harbour

Mr. Phillippe Landron

Mr. Jean-Luc
Maurange

Mr. Thomas L. Saeli

Mr. Larry R. Wendling

Mr. David J. Fallon
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
E. Mead, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      Except for failure to comply with all requirements of
                  Regulation S-X due to the disclaimer of an opinion by the
                  Company's auditors on the Company's consolidated financial
                  statements for the year ended December 31, 2000, the Report
                  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Dated:  November 19, 2002                            /s/ ROBERT E. MEAD
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                       Robert E. Mead
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

March 17, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-12416

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00397-CV-OC-10GRJ

MARGA TAYLOR, as Personal

Representative of the Estate 

of Earl C. Hitchcock, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

ED DEAN, individually, and in his 

official capacity as Sheriff of 

Marion County, Florida, et al., 

Defendants, 

JOHNNY PAPPAS, individually, and in 

his official capacity as Deputy Sheriff

of Marion County, Florida, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(March 17, 2008)
Honorable B. Avant Edenfield, United States District Judge for the Southern District of *

Georgia, sitting by designation.

2

Before HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and EDENFIELD, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district

court’s May 17, 2007 order denying summary judgment to defendant-appellant

Johnny Pappas.

AFFIRMED.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 2143

JEREMY BREYON HUDSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. HAMPTON ROADS SHIPPING ASSOCIATION

- ILA; ILA #970 , Defendants

- Appellees

.

No. 22
- 2144

JEREMY BREYON HUDSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. HAMPTON ROADS SHIPPING ASSOCIATION

- ILA; ILA #970 , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 2:21

- cv - 00464

- AWA

- DEM ; 2:21

- cv 00466

- AWA

- DEM )

Submitted : September 7, 2023 Decided: November 7, 2023 USCA4 Appeal: 22-2143 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/07/2023 Pg: 1 of 32 Before WYNN and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Jeremy Breyon Hudson , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-2143 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/07/2023 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM: Jeremy Br e yon Hudson appeals the district court’s order s dismissing his civil action s pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). * We have reviewed the record s and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders

. Hudson v. Hampton Rds. Shipping Ass’n , Nos. 2:21

- cv - 00464

- AWA

- DEM ; 2:21

- cv - 00466

- AWA

- DEM (E.D. Va. Nov. 3, 2022). We deny Hudson’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* The district court also concluded that dismissal of the actions was warranted solely on the basis of Hudson’s failure to comply with the court’s show cause orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). USCA4 Appeal: 22-2143 Doc: 13 Filed: 11/07/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 33-54794, No. 33-54796, No. 33-54798, No. 33-95274, and No. 33-
95276) of CoreComm Incorporated (formerly Cellular Communications of Puerto
Rico, Inc. (the "Company")) of our report dated February 23, 1997, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Juan, Puerto Rico
March 27, 1997
#### Trent HARVEY v. Kelly (Singleton) HARVEY.

No. 2011-CJ-0719.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2011.

In re Harvey, Kelly Singleton; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Vernon, 30th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 78,644; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-1338.

Denied.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


        - Image Sciences, Inc.
          Texas
          100% owned


        - FormMaker Software, Inc.
          Georgia
          100% owned


        - EZPower Systems, Inc.
          Delaware
          100% owned


        - Maitland Software, Inc.
          Maine
          100% owned


        - Docucorp Europe Ltd
          London, England
          100% owned


        - Newbridge Information Services, Inc.
          Texas
          100% owned


        - Matrix Digital Technologies, Inc.
          Texas
          100% owned
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Eric Dale MICKELSON.

No. 2010-KK-2740.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 4, 2011.

In re Mickelson, Eric Dale; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 4, No. 262,256; to the Court of Appeal, Second” Circuit, No. 46112-KW.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>

     In connection with the Annual Report of Liquor Group Wholesale, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending August 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), C.J. Eiras, the Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, and Jason Bandy, the Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
their knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.


December 15, 2008                LIQUOR GROUP WHOLESALE, INC.




                                 By:    /s/ C.J. Eiras
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        C.J. Eiras, Principal Executive Officer


                                 By:    /s/ Jason Bandy
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Jason Bandy, Principal Financial Officer
#### Manuel CRIOLLO, Petitioner, v. Barbara J. CRIOLLO, n/k/a Barbara J. Langella, Respondent.

No. 5D10-3597.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Feb. 4, 2011.

Cheri A. Russell and Mark D. Shelnutt of Mark D. Shelnutt, P.A., Ocala, for Petitioner.

No Appearance for Respondent.

*392PER CURIAM.

Manuel Criollo petitioned the court for habeas corpus relief, asserting that he was entitled to immediate release from incarceration imposed for contempt. We agree with Petitioner and order his release.1

Petitioner was held in civil contempt for failing to pay child support arrearages and alimony due in the amount of $66,615.45. The trial court ordered Petitioner incarcerated for a period of one hundred days for the contempt, with a purge amount equal to the full sum owed. After reviewing the transcript of the hearing on the motion, this court determines that the evidence presented did not support the finding that the petitioner had the present ability to pay the purge amount. Release is therefore mandated, and the order of contempt is appropriately vacated. *See*Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.615(e).

PETITION GRANTED.

LAWSON, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

1

. Petitioner was released by order November 9, 2010 with this opinion to follow.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF VARI-LITE INTERNATIONAL, INC.


<Table>
<Caption>
NAME                                   JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION     OWNER
----                                   -----------------------------     -----
<S>                                    <C>                               <C>
Vari-Lite, Inc.                        Delaware                          Vari-Lite International, Inc.

Concert Production Lighting, Inc.      Delaware                          Vari-Lite International, Inc.

Woosch, Inc.                           Delaware                          Vari-Lite International, Inc.

IGNITION! Creative Group, Inc.         Delaware                          Vari-Lite International, Inc.

Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.        United Kingdom                    Vari-Lite International, Inc.

Vari-Lite Europe, Ltd.                 United Kingdom                    Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.

Theatre Projects Lighting
Services, Ltd.                         United Kingdom                    Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.

B. S. Ltd.                             United Kingdom                    Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.

Irideon, Ltd.                          United Kingdom                    Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.

VLPS, Ltd.                             United Kingdom                    Vari-Lite Europe Holdings, Ltd.

Vari-Lite Production Services
Europe, NV                             Belgium                           Vari-Lite International, Inc.

Vari-Lite Asia, Inc.                   Japan                             Vari-Lite International, Inc.

Vari-Lite Production Services
Hong Kong Limited                      Hong Kong                         Vari-Lite International, Inc.

Vari-Lite Hong Kong, Ltd.              Hong Kong                         Vari-Lite International, Inc.

</Table>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1437 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1437

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify and make permanent 
       the deduction for qualified tuition and related expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2007

Mr. Burton of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify and make permanent 
       the deduction for qualified tuition and related expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR QUALIFIED TUITION AND RELATED EXPENSES.

    (a) Deduction Made Permanent.--
            (1) In general.--Section 222 of the Internal Revenue Code 
        of 1986 is amended by striking subsection (e).
            (2) EGTRRA sunset.--Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax 
        Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 shall not apply to section 
        431 of such Act.
    (b) Increase in Dollar Limitation; Repeal of AGI Phaseout.--
Subsection (b) of section 222 of such Code is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(b) Dollar Limitation.--The amount allowed as a deduction under 
subsection (a) with respect to the taxpayer for any taxable year shall 
not exceed $5,000.''.
    (c) Allowance of Deduction to Grandparents.--Subsection (d) of 
section 222 of such Code is amended by redesignating paragraph (6) as 
paragraph (7) and inserting after paragraph (5) the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(6) Grandchildren treated as dependents.--
                    ``(A) In general.--For purposes of determining 
                qualified tuition and related expenses for purposes of 
                this section, any grandchild of the taxpayer shall be 
                treated as a dependent of the taxpayer.
                    ``(B) Grandchildren.--For purposes of this 
                paragraph, the term `grandchild' means a child of any 
                child of the taxpayer.''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006.
                                 <all>
```
#### A. F. Fagan v. West Whitcomb.

(No. 3187.)

Appeal from Anderson County.

A. W. Gregg and L. S. Hats, counsel for appellant.

John J. Word, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 27. *Landlord and tenant; measure of damages for injury to premises.*One of the items claimed by the plaintiff in the account sued upon was “to damages to said Whitcomb’s farm and premises, $75.50.” To prove this item, plaintiff was permitted, over objection of defendant, to ask his witness what it would be worth to repair the farm and put it in the same condition as when the defendant, Fagan, as Whitcomb’s tenant, went on the place. It is insisted that such evidence did not establish a proper measure of damages in an action by a landlord against a tenant for injury to premises during a lease, but that the true measure of damages would be, not what it would be worth to put the property *in statu quo,*but the injury to the market value of the reversion. In his work on Landlord and Tenant Mr. Wood says: “In the case of an action by the landlord against the tenant before the term is ended, when the landlord has not himself made the repairs, he is entitled to recover *48the injury to his reversion by reason of the tenant’s neglect to repair, and is not necessarily restricted to a recovery of nominal damages merely; the loss he would sustain by reason of dilapidations if he went into the market to sell the reversion is the true criterion, and not, as held by Lord Holt, such sum as would be required to repair the same. But if the landlord goes on and makes the repairs, he is entitled to recover the reasonable and necessary expenses thereof, in addition to any other damages which he may sustain by reason of the tenant’s default,” etc. [Page 642.] This rule in no wise conflicts with those announced in Railway Co. v. Jochim, 58 Tex. 456; but, on the other hand, we think, is in full harmony with them, the difference in the facts of the two cases being considered. In this case Whitcomb had not made the repairs for which he was suing, and the correct measure of damages is, we think, as above stated by Mr. Wood, and as claimed by appellant. The court erred in admitting the testimony objected to.

November 27, 1889.

§ 28. *Measure of damages for work improperly done.*On a claim for damages for work improperly done, the measure of damage is the difference in its value as done and what its value would have been if properly done. Such damage is fully adjusted when the party doing the work is only allowed the actual value of his work.

Reversed and remanded.
LA JOLLA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY
Exhibit 32.1




---



##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2010 (the Report), which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such quarter and the results
of operations of the Registrant for such quarter.
  /s/ Deirdre Y. GillespieDeirdre Y. Gillespie, M.D.President and Chief Executive Officer
[Principal Executive Officer]/s/ Gail A. SloanGail A. SloanChief Financial Officer and Secretary
[Principal Financial Officer] Note:
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to La
Jolla Pharmaceutical Company and will be retained by La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### WATSON v. PACE, Secretary of Army.

C. A. No. 4670-49.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

Dec. 3, 1951.

Claude L. Dawson, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Joseph Kovner, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Joseph L. Watson, seeks judgment of this Court declaring that he was unlawfully discharged as a Civil Service employee of defendant. He further requests that he be restored to service with accrued salary. It is conceded that all procedural requirements of the law were met as to notice and hearing. However, plaintiff asserts that there is no evidence justifying his discharge and that therefore the action discharging him was arbitrary and capricious.

*478I do not believe that plaintiff’s contention is well taken. Plaintiff held the position of Civilian Personnel Officer and Executive Secretary of the Civil Service Board of Examiners. He was charged with violations of certain established rules and procedures relating to the performance of his duties in those positions. The most that can be said for his contention in this case is that the isstie of fact whether he violated the rules was decided adversely to him by the administrative officials.

There is no evidence that these officials did not act in good faith, or were motivated by malice, or did not honestly exercise their judgment that plaintiff had violated the rules. To the contrary, the record clearly justifies the conclusion that the officers acted in good faith in concluding that plaintiff’s discharge would promote the efficiency of the service because of the rule violations.

The determination whether or not a person’s discharge would promote the efficiency of the Government service is vested in the administrative officer and no Court has power to review his action if that action was taken in good faith. Gadsden v. United States, 78 F.Supp. 126, 111 ct. cl. 487; Carter v. Forrestal, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 53, 175 F.2d 364; Levine v. Farley, 70 App.D.C. 381, 107 F.2d 186; Eberlein v. United States, 1921, 257 U.S. 82, 45 S.Ct. 12, 66 L.Ed. 140.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law may be drawn in conformance with this opinion.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Joseph V. GreenName:
    
    Joseph V. GreenTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    May 8, 2007
#### STATE ex rel. Derrick LEE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-0322.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re Lee, Derrick; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court *1169Div. E, No. 372-835; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-1695.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.