alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Joseph L. Lovejoy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 16, 2009



/s/ Joseph L. LovejoyJoseph L. LovejoySenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
#### August W. HOFFMANN, III v. NEW ORLEANS SAINTS.

No. 2011-C-0676.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2011.

In re Hoffmann III, August W.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review Office of the Workers’ Compensation District 7, No. 06-7980; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-CA-391.

Denied.
#### B. Cobb et al. v. B. Morris.

(No. 3380.)

Appeal from Wise County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 668. *Appeal; sureties in a replevy bond against whom a judgment is rendered may join in an appeal.*C.’s property being levied upon under an attachment in *590favor of M., he replevied the same, R. and P. being sureties upon his replevy bond. Judgment was rendered in justice’s court against 0. and his said sureties upon the replevy bond, and they appealed to the county court, giving a joint appeal bond. In the county court the appeal bond was dismissed upon motion of M. because said sureties had joined in the appeal bond as principals. *Held*error. As the judgment was rendered against the sureties upon the replevy bond, they had the right to-appeal therefrom, and it was proper for them to join with their principal, 0., in the appeal bond.

May 2, 1885.

Reversed and remanded.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 117 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a permanent 

hold harmless provision for sole community hospitals under the Medicare 

prospective payment system for covered outpatient department services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 

the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for a permanent hold harmless provision for sole community hospitals under the Medicare prospective payment 

system for covered outpatient department services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 117 IH

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT HOLD HARMLESS FOR SOLE COM2 MUNITY HOSPITALS UNDER THE MEDICARE 

3 PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR HOS4 PITAL OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT SERVICES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1833(t)(7)(D) of the So6 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(t)(7)(D)) is amended 

7 by adding at the end the following new clause: 

8 ‘‘(iii) PERMANENT HOLD HARMLESS

9 FOR SOLE COMMUNITY HOSPITALS.—In the 

10 case of a sole community hospital (as de11 fined in section 1886(d)(5)(D)(iii)), for 

12 covered OPD services furnished after De13 cember 31, 2005, for which the PPS 

14 amount is less than the pre-BBA amount, 

15 the amount of payment under this sub16 section shall be increased by the amount of 

17 such difference.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to payment for 

20 OPD services furnished on and after January 1, 2008. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Report") of TF Financial Corporation (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  we, Kent
C.  Lufkin,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and  Dennis R.  Stewart,
Executive  Vice  President and Chief  Financial  Officer  (Principal  Accounting
Officer),  hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: November 13, 2003           /s/ Kent C. Lufkin
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Kent C. Lufkin
                                      President and CEO
                                      (Principal Executive Officer)



Date: November 13, 2003           /s/ Dennis R. Stewart
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Dennis R. Stewart
                                      Executive Vice President and
                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                      (Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)
#### Kevin A. PIPER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL, ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS’ LICENSING BOARD, Appellee.

No. 1D10-2792.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 21, 2010.

M. Christopher Bryant, Timothy P. Atkinson, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Deborah Bartholow Loucks, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges a final order of the Electrical Contractors’ Licensing Board denying his application for an unlimited electrical contractor’s license. Although Appellant raises three issues on appeal, this opinion only addresses whether the final order incorrectly listed Appellant’s unfavorable credit history as a ground for denial of his application. It is clear from the transcript of the hearing the Board was satisfied with Appellant’s explanation regarding his finances and, thus, Appellant’s credit history was not a basis for denial of the application. Because the error is apparent from the record, we remand for the Board to correct the error by amended final order. *See Mitchell v. Mitchell,*841 So.2d 564, 568 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); *see also Gaudet v. Fla. Bd. of Prof'l Engineers,*900 So.2d 574, 577 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED.

DAVIS, HAWKES and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
#### Jesse DIXON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-4309.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 4, 2001.

*282Before NORRIS and CLAY, Circuit Judges, and ROSEN, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Gerald E. Rosen. United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Jesse Dixon, appeals from the denial by the district court of his application for attorney fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A).

Having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we are not persuaded that the district court abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs application.

Because the reasoning which supports the denial has been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the order of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning employed by the United States Magistrate Judge in his Memorandum Decision and Order filed on August 25, 1999.
#### In re: Christopher Kevin LETT; In re: Patricia Lynn Lett, Debtors, First American Title Insurance Company; Green Tree Financial Servicing, Appellees, v. Christopher Kevin Lett; Patricia Lynn Lett, Appellants.

No. 00-1707.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 8, 2001.

Decided Jan. 19, 2001.

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Spouses Christopher Kevin Lett and Patricia Lynn Lett bought real estate in Missouri and a mobile home to place there. The land was financed by a deed of trust *600to a bank and the mobile home was financed by Green Tree Financial Servicing. The Letts later sold half of the land and, by mistake, the bank released its security interest for the entire property. After construction and improvements, the mobile home became a permanent structure on the land contrary to the Letts’ agreement with Green Tree, and when the Letts sold the remaining land with the home, Green Tree’s security interest in the mobile home was not discovered on the land records. Two days after First American Title Insurance Company filed a complaint against the Letts, the Letts filed a petition in bankruptcy. First American and Green Tree filed adversary proceedings seeking an exception from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) (money or property obtained by false pretenses, false representation, or actual fraud) and 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) (willful or malicious conversion of another’s property without their knowledge or consent). The bankruptcy court held the Letts’ debt to First American was nondischargeable under § 523(a)(2)(A) and the Letts’ debts to First American and Green Tree were nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6). *See In re Lett,*238 B.R. 167 (Bkrtcy.W.D.Mo.1999). The bankruptcy court also imposed a constructive trust on the Letts’ Kansas real estate, which the Letts had purchased with the ill-gotten proceeds from the sale of their Missouri property, and denied the Letts a discharge under § 727(a)(2)(A). *See id.*The district court affirmed. On appeal, the Letts assert a shotgun array of issues. Having considered them all, we affirm on the basis of the district court’s thorough, twenty-seven page order. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.01

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Keynote Systems, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8, Nos. 333-73244, 333-47980, and 333-87791 of Keynote Systems, Inc. of
our report dated October 25, 2001, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Keynote Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2001 and
2000 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended September 30, 2001, and the related financial statement
schedule, which report appears in the September 30, 2001 annual report on Form
10-K of Keynote Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries.

                                                             /s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
December 28, 2001
**Exhibit** **32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

I, David M. Bronson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ David M. Bronson

David M. Bronson

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

February 8, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          33,956
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,692)
<INVENTORY>                                        660
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,670
<PP&E>                                          32,996
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,474)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 202,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         (90,567)
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         (363)
<OTHER-SE>                                   (100,938)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (202,935)
<SALES>                                        249,327
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               249,327
<CGS>                                        (144,764)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (144,764)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (115,243)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,445)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,445)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,445)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 58413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23954]



[[Page 58413]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, September 30, 2010, 8:30 a.m. 
to October 1, 2010, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the Federal 
Register on September 9, 2010, 75 FR 54896-54897.
    The meeting will be one day only September 30, 2010. The meeting 
time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: September 20, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-23954 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
News United States Air Force
 Airmen, Marines join forces after aircraft crashPublished March 6, 2015
                        
                        By by Senior Airman Sandra Marrero
                        
                        
                        23rd Wing Public Affairs
                **STATENVILLE, Ga. (AFNS) --**
                Airmen from Moody Air Force Base, Georgia, provided support to the Marines following a non-lethal F/A-18D Hornet crash Feb. 22, in the woods near Statenville, Georgia.
The aircraft, assigned to Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort, South Carolina, crashed approximately 25 miles from Moody AFB, and coordination between personnel at both installations was key in starting a recovery mission.
After ensuring the jet aviators' safety, the Marines' priority was to build a command post and recover aircraft parts from the crash site to help investigators determine the cause of the accident, said Marine Corps Capt. Luke Knorra, the All-Weather Fighter Attack Squadron 224 aviation safety officer.
To aid in these efforts, Moody AFB personnel provided tools and the manpower to get the recovery operation started.
"We were their logistical, contracting and supply support in the sense that we provided them materials, tools, manpower, and equipment necessary to start searching for the aircraft," said 1st Lt. Pete Mines, the 23rd Contracting Squadron officer in charge of base services.
Support included food, water, vehicles necessary to locate the wreckage. Additionally, they provided Airmen and heavy equipment to clear a path to deliver supplies and build a command post.
"The command post is the mini-command center they'll work out of possibly for the next few months (while they recover aircraft parts from the swampy area)," said Senior Airman Travis Brock, a 23rd Civil Engineer Squadron operations management journeyman. "So we gave them a comfortable place to do it."
With the command post ready, MCAS Beaufort members are taking time to consider their next steps.
"Right now we're kind of in pause mode to generate a plan," Knorra said. "The Naval Safety Center is working with us to plan the extraction of the wreckage, investigation and the environmental cleanup."
Getting to this point was a joint effort and Mines said he was pleased to help.
"The Air Force and Moody Air Force Base as a whole are always happy to help a sister service," Mines said. "We fight and work in a joint environment so it's always good to get out there and help them."
Knorra and Brock agreed the partnership between the branches is essential to the success of this mission and Knorra specifically recognized Moody AFB’s role.
"The coordination with the Air Force has been amazing," Knorra said. "We couldn't have done it without the support we had and in a very timely, expedient manner."ACC 



recovery 



F/A-18D Hornet 



joint 



Marines 



Moody AFB
Exhibit 99.1




         Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code),  each
of the undersigned  officers of Nova  International  Films,  Inc. (the Company),
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31,
2003  of  the  Company  fully  complies,  in all  material  respects,  with  the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
and information  contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                       /s/ Raymond Ying Mai Kwan
March 24, 2003                                        --------------------------
                                                      Raymond Ying Mai Kwan
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6892

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BASHAWN LEE HANBERRY, a/k/a Bo,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Russell A. Eliason, Magistrate

Judge. (CR-94-185, CA-99-13-1)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 7, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bashawn Lee Hanberry, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith,

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Bashawn Lee Hanberry appeals a district court order denying

his motion (1) to amend his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. §

2255 (West Supp. 1999); (2) to expand discovery; and (3) to serve

newly discovered evidence. We dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, see 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. See 28

U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order.

We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal

as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Brigham Exploration Company (the“Company”) on Form 10-K, for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”), I, Eugene B.Shepherd, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:
(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 31, 2005 /s/ Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr.Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr.Chief Financial Officer