alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6041-6042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2434]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; Basic Science R21s, Ks.
    Date: March 8-9, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Courtyard by Marriott, Gaithersburg Washingtonian Center, 
204 Boardwalk Place, Gaithersburg, MD.
    Contact Person: Peter Kozel, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
NCCAM, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892-5475, 
301-496-8004, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#80ebeffae5ecf0c0ede1e9ecaeeee9e8aee7eff6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4c27233629203c0c212d252062222524622b233a">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 6042]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, 
Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 27, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-2434 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Warren Reginald JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-4459.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 12, 2011.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 17, 2011.

Warren Reginald Johnson, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(d)(5).

WOLF, LEWIS, and RAY, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2010 (the “Report”) of TF Financial Corporation (the “Company”) as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Kent C. Lufkin,President and Chief Executive Officer, and Dennis R. Stewart, Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer), herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |                  |   | /s/  Kent C. Lufkin                                   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  | August 13,  2010 |   | Kent  C. Lufkin                                       |
|   |                  |   | President  and CEO                                    |
|   |                  |   | (Principal  Executive Officer)                        |
|   |                  |   |                                                  |
|   |                  |   |                                                  |
|   |                  |   | /s/  Dennis R. Stewart                                |
| Date:  | August 13,  2010 |   | Dennis  R. Stewart                                    |
|   |                  |   | Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                  |   | (Principal  Financial & Accounting Officer)  |

 

----
#### C.J. and E.J., In the Interest of D.K.R., A Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D10-5174.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 13, 2011.

*393Gary Baker, Callahan, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee; and Jody Greene, Yulee, for Ap-pellee.

WOLF, J.

Appellants seek review of an order granting appellee’s unsworn Motion to Dismiss appellants’ Petition for Dependency. We reverse because the factual allegations contained within the four corners of the pleading, when construed in favor of appellants, are legally sufficient to prove dependency pursuant to section 39.01(15), Florida Statutes (2010). *See Dep’t of Children & Families v. R.V.,*917 So.2d 334 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (noting that motions to dismiss filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.235(b) are akin to motions to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action in civil proceedings); *Locker v. United Pharm. Group, Inc.,*46 So.3d 1126, 1128 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (noting that a trial court must accept all factual allegations in the four corners of an initial pleading as true and must construe those facts in a manner favorable to the filing party when considering a motion to dismiss); *C.J. v. Dep’t of Children & Families,*756 So.2d 1108, 1110 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (finding Guardian Ad Litem’s report was inadmissible hearsay).*

REVERSED.

PADOVANO and ROWE, JJ., concur.

*

 Had the motion to dismiss been sworn and filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.235(c), the actions of the trial court may have been justified. It appears, however, the trial court made factual findings based on unsworn allegations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,552
<SECURITIES>                                     6,062
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,070)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,039
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,200
<PP&E>                                           3,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (526)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          (8,985)
<BONDS>                                           (74)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          (17)
<OTHER-SE>                                    (25,647)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (35,121)
<SALES>                                         10,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,083
<CGS>                                          (5,550)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (5,550)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,525)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (7)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (9)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,974)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,992)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,974)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)


</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Rayvell FINCH v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-1690.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Finch, Rayvell; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District *1262Court Div. I, No. 390-132; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-0707.

Denied.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Docucorp International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
D. Andereck, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Michael D. Andereck
--------------------------------------
Michael D. Andereck
President and Chief Executive Officer
October 14, 2004




                                       63
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

               SUBSIDIARIES OF SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                     STATE OF ORGANIZATION
------------------                                     ---------------------
Summit Management Company                                    Maryland
Summit Apartment Builders, Inc.                               Florida
Stony Point/Summit Limited Partnership                       Virginia
Summit/Belmont Limited Partnership                           Virginia
Henderson/McGuire Partners (Limited Partnership)             Delaware
McGregor/McGuire Limited Partnership                          Florida
Sand Lake Joint Venture                                       Florida
Portofino Place, Ltd.                                         Florida
Foxcroft East Associates                                  North Carolina
Summit Stonefield, LLC                                     Pennsylvania
Summit Southwest, L.P.                                       Delaware
Summit Valley Brook, LLC                                     Delaware
Summit Shiloh, LLC                                            Georgia
Summit Sweetwater, LLC                                        Georgia
Summit Grandview, LLC                                     North Carolina
Summit Grand Parc, LLC                                       Delaware
Summit Roosevelt, LLC                                        Delaware
Exhibit 32

Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of WidePoint Corporation (the Company), hereby
certify, based on our knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the year ended December 31, 2004 ( the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ STEVE L. KOMAR Steve
L. KomarChief Executive Officer

/s/ JAMES T. MCCUBBIN
 James T. McCubbinChief Financial Officer

Date:  April 15,
2005
#### CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipality of the State of Florida, Petitioner, v. STAR ISLAND ENTERTAINMENT LLC, d/b/a Mansion, Respondent.

No. 3D09-2547.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 15, 2011.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 21, 2011.

Jose Smith, City Attorney, Debora J. Turner, First City Attorney, and Sheri Sack, First Assistant City Attorney, for petitioner.

Levine & Partners, and Alan W. Levine, Paul Levine, Clearwater, Robert J. Levine and Suzan Jon Jacobs, Miami, for respondent.

Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and EMAS, JJ.

SUAREZ, J.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari denied. *See Custer Med. Ctr. v. United Auto. Ins. Co.,*62 So.3d 1086 (Fla.2010).
#### Frank Paul FERRARA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald ANGELONE, Director, Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 00-7275.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 2001.

Decided Jan. 17, 2001.

Frank Paul Ferrara, pro se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Frank Paul Ferrara seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 *&*Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *Ferrara v. Angelone,*No. CA-99-1401-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### Chas. Allen v. J. N. Hogan.

(No. 6342.)

Appeal from Llano County.

Knight & Stith, counsel for appellant.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 93. *Practice; pleading; failure to present to jury at opening of trial will not authorize exclusion of evidence offered under.*Suit in justice’s court by appellee against appellant upon an itemized account, and for damages for breach of a contract, and judgment in said court for appellee. On appeal by appellant to the county court, and upon a trial *de novo,*appellee recovered judgment for $90 and costs. Appellant pleaded payment and a counterclaim, his counter-claim being itemized. In the county court he offered testimony to prove said defenses, which testimony was rejected by the court upon the ground, as *137we gather from the record, that said pleas had not been stated or read to the court and jury. This ruling of the court was erroneous. Said pleas had been filed among the papers in the cause, and the mere failure to state or read them formally to the jury at the opening of the trial should not have deprived appellant of their benefit. Appellee knew that said pleas were on file in the case, and no injury could Tesult to him by the omission to formally present them to the court and jury.. Because of the error above mentioned the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

April 23, 1890.

Beversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       4,226,434
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,658,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                   110,000
<INVENTORY>                                    394,554
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,169,111
<PP&E>                                         705,445
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,988,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,257,847
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,950
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,830,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,988,956
<SALES>                                     27,196,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,196,125
<CGS>                                       12,140,007
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,140,007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,165,594
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              76,296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,058,405)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,648
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,096,053)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,096,053)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Cedrick ROBINSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-1686.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Robinson, Cedrick; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial *1261District Court Div. D, No. 04-8282; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KH-604.

Denied.
F09-55995-H KENNETH § :· i'""'\ JOHN WEEKLEY IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT

- I 

## v. § NUMBER 1, DALLAS**~c'f!** 

### r".:"r**~n**

- " I i ._,.. ...... --• ""' "-..-' 

### p·· ..... (19 !l**~** .. v THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY TEXAS '· DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1, DALLAS COUNTY TEXAS: JOHN KENNETH WEEKLEY,**Defendan~** pro se in the above styled and numbered case hereby gives notion of appeal of the Trial Courts decision of November 18, 2014 denying his Motion for DNA Testing pursuant to TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 64 TEX. R. APP. P. 2s.2 Ca)(2) PRAYER WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant prays this Court grant him permission to appeal pursuant to TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 64.05

pro se

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a true and correct copy of Defendants Notice of Appeal was sent to the below by U.S. Mail, first class, postage pre paid on this the 18th. day of December 2014 District Attorneys Office Frank Crowley Courts Bldg. 133 N. Riverside Blvd., LB 19

# ~~las,**~~~:/t:~~-----** J n Kenneth

### W~---- -1- 05-15-00037-CR ACCEPTED 05-15-00037-CR FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS 1/13/2015 9:23:04 AM

LISA MATZ CLERK... ···,l 

### m

## ~ 

# -**~** 0 j-.1

## ~ »

.... 

# t () 

## &" 

# =- ··.J 2. F ?**!~:i** 

# - l/I .i=:i

# ~ (' 

## b**!.t~ ~**  {? '·· 

## c: s; () c. i ('°)

- ...J

### ~ 

# -r Vi

### ~**~**

### ~ CJ 

### e. >

## ~ .....J 

### -r-- "') J (;::> -r- _, ..t 

### c;_ V'**~** Vi**~ ~**  l' 

## - 

# - .. l,J 

# -· r 

# - 0 I""



# - r J



# - (jJ G"' i.,:::



# - l\j\ 

# -· vJ () "1)



# - n



# -**-~** g!1. 

### .,



# -**~** 

# -· -·

- ,. 

# - ..



# - -· ....... 

# -·


# -



# -

- -· 

# -· 

# -·
Department of the United States Air Force LogoBiography
                  United States Air ForceDR SETH L. LACY
            DR. SETH L. LACYDr. Seth Lacy, a member of the U.S. Air Force’s cadre of scientific and technical senior executives, is the Senior Scientist for Space Mobility and Precision Maneuver, Air Force Research Laboratory, Air Force Material Command, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico. He serves as the Department’s principal scientific authority and independent researcher for the development of new technologies in support of space mobility and precision maneuver.
Dr. Lacy joined the AFRL, Space Vehicles Directorate in 2002. He has led teams to develop technologies in control theory, estimation, uncertainty management, large optical apertures, laser communications, rendezvous and proximity operations, communications and space sensing as well as championing rapid development and test of space technologies.**EDUCATION**
1997 Bachelor of Science, Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
1997 Bachelor of Science, Engineering and Applied Science, Aerospace Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
1999 Master of Science in Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
2002 Master of Science, Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
2002 Doctor of Philosophy, Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor**ASSIGNMENTS**
1. September 2002–September 2005, Technical Lead, Large Deployable Optics Program, Space Vehicles Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M.
2. October 2005–September 2007, Technical Lead, Multi-Access Lasercom Program, Space Vehicles Directorate, AFRL, Kirtland AFB, N.M.
3. October 2007–September 2016, ANGELS Chief Scientist, Space Vehicles Directorate, AFRL, Kirtland AFB, N.M.
4. October 2016–September 2017, Sabbatical, Sandia National Laboratories, Kirtland AFB, N.M.
5. October 2017–September 2018, Blackjack Positioning, Navigation and Timing Lead, Space Vehicles Directorate, AFRL, Kirtland AFB, N.M.
6. October 2018–September 2019, Space Communications and PNT Mission Lead, Space Vehicles Directorate, AFRL, Kirtland AFB, N.M.
7. October 2019–September 2023, Lead Experimentalist for Small Satellites, Space Vehicles Directorate, AFRL, Kirtland AFB, N.M.
8. October 2023–present, Senior Scientist, Space Mobility and Precision Maneuver, AFRL, Kirtland AFB, N.M.**MAJOR AWARDS AND DECORATIONS**
2011 Director’s Cup, Air Force Research Laboratory, Space Vehicles
2016 Rotary National Award for Space Achievement
(Current as of January 2024)Department of the Air Force Logo
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, being, Cornelis F. Wit, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ronald T. Linares, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Cornelis F. Wit 

Cornelis F. Wit 

President, Chief ExecutiveOffice (principal executive officer) 

March 30, 2011 

/s/ Ronald T. Linares 

Ronald T. Linares 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) 

March 30, 2011