alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.01**

 

**CONSENT OF KPMG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

The Board of Directors 

Keynote Systems, Inc.: 

 

We consent to incorporationby reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-107442, 333-85242, 333-73244, 333-47980, and 333-87791) of Keynote Systems, Inc. of our report dated October 24, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of KeynoteSystems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedSeptember 30, 2003, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the September 30, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Keynote Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries. 

 

/S/    KPMG LLP 

 

Mountain View, California 

December 29, 2003
EX-32.1

               CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB
of Financial Ventures, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2007, I,
Matthew McNeally Chief Executive Officer of Financial Ventures,
Inc. and I, V. Terence Franzke, Chief Financial Officer of Financial
Ventures, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) 	such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March
31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-
KSB for the year ended March 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Financial Ventures, Inc.

August 23, 2007


                                By:/s/ Matthew McNeally
                                   --------------------------
                                    Matthew McNeally
                                    Chief Executive Officer


                                By:/s/ V. Terence Franzke
                                  ---------------------------
                                    V. Terence Franzke
                                    Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Daniel Knutson, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Land O’Lakes, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors:     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: April 15, 2008       By: /s/ Daniel Knutson Daniel Knutson    Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 58420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24013]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1933-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]


Wisconsin; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Wisconsin (FEMA-1933-DR), dated August 11, 2010, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 18, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Wisconsin is hereby amended to include the Individual 
Assistance program for the following areas among those areas determined 
to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster 
by the President in his declaration of August 11, 2010.

    Grant and Milwaukee Counties for Individual Assistance (already 
designated for Public Assistance).
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-24013 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7422-S7423]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             PROVIDING FOR AN ADJOURNMENT OF THE TWO HOUSES

  Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate now 
turn to the adjournment resolution, House Concurrent Resolution 72.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report.
  The legislative clerk read as follows:

       Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection to the immediate 
consideration of the concurrent resolution?
  There being no objection, the Senate proceeded to consider the 
concurrent resolution.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is on agreeing to the concurrent 
resolution.
  The concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 72) was agreed to.
  The concurrent resolution is as follows:
       Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
     concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative 
     day of Thursday, May 25, 1995, it stand adjourned until noon 
     on Tuesday, June 6, 1995, or until noon on [[Page S7423]] the 
     second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant 
     to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
     first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the 
     close of business on Thursday, May 25, 1995, Friday, May 26, 
     1995, or Saturday, May 27, 1995, pursuant to a motion made by 
     the Majority Leader or his designee, in accordance with this 
     resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until 10 a.m. on 
     Monday, June 5, 1995, or until noon on the second day after 
     Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of 
     this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
       Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of 
     the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the 
     Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the 
     Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and Senate, 
     respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the 
     public interest shall warrant it.
     

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 10(a)  


Independent Auditors' Consent


The
Board of Directors

First Variable Life Insurance Company 


        We
consent to the use of our report on the statement of changes in net assets and the related financial highlights of each of the sub-accounts of First Variable Life Insurance
Company — First Variable Annuity Fund E dated April 30, 2002 included herein and to the reference to our firm under the heading "Independent Accountants" in the Statement of
Additional Information, in the initial registration statement (Form N-4, File No. 811-4092) of First Variable Annuity Fund E. 


s
/KPMG LLP/

Chicago, Illinois

December 31, 2003
This contract was a verbal contract  between the Security  Project Manager of U.
S. Satellite and the President of Downstream,  doing business as, SSI - Security
Solutions  Incorporated,  that was outlined and  confirmed in a letter sent from
SSI to the  Project  Manager  of U. S.  Satellite.  The  letter  was  dated  and
addressed to the Security Project Manager of U. S. Satellite and read:

         Please have the  equipment to be installed in the Osco Drug Stores #516
in  Davenport,  IA and #533 in Des  Moines,  IA sent to our  affiliate  in Cedar
Rapids, IA:

                             ASI - All Secure, Inc.
                              Attn: Mr. Sonny Friis
                         5925 Council St. NE, Suite 160
                             Cedar Rapids, IA 52410

         As agreed,  SSI will install  burglar alarm systems and CCTV monitoring
systems  in each of these  stores  for the  price of $9250  (nine  thousand  two
hundred fifty dollars) per store.  It is understood  that  USSC/American  Stores
will supply all  equipment to be installed  and that  American  Stores will have
each store  prewired,  with all  necessary  boxes and conduit  laid prior to our
installation  of these  systems.  If for some reason  American  Stores  fails to
prewire said facilities,  SSI, and/or its affiliates, will run the wire, lay the
conduit  and install the boxes for an  additional  price of $1500 (one  thousand
five  hundred  dollars) per store,  for a total price of $10,750  (ten  thousand
seven hundred fifty dollars) per store. SSI shall provide on sight inspection of
all stores,  and USSC/American  Stores shall pay SSI the agreed upon amounts for
its services  within 30 days after the  completion of the  installation  of said
systems. Thank you for allowing SSI to serve you.

Warmest Regards,
Barry A. Ellsworth

                                       22
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             640
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   640
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,619
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,025
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,614)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,030
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,632
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,614)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,614)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Reginald ANOWI v. Cue T. NGUYEN, Phong T. Nguyen, Michael Hillaham, Newell Normand, XYZ Insurance Carrier and Prudential Property Casualty Insurance.

No. 2012-C-0111.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 2012.

*1248In re Anowi, Reginald; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. 0, No. 681^497; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-CA-468.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000             JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                             175                      20
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,353                  15,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,794                   2,325
<INVENTORY>                                     45,015                  40,601
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,224                  58,386
<PP&E>                                          64,078                  61,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,771                  16,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,722                 181,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,072                  41,708
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,850                  10,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,722                 181,943
<SALES>                                        155,403                 114,791
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,403                 114,791
<CGS>                                          110,631                  83,228
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,312                 103,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,983                     550
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   340                     286
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,427                  11,527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,319)                   (881)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,492)                   (290)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,319)                   (881)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (750)                    (90)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,577)                   (681)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 8.1



List of Significant Subsidiaries of United Microelectronics Corporation



|                                      |  |                               |  |                                               
|------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Company                               |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |  | Percentage of Ownershipas of December 31, 2003
|Fortune Venture Capital Corporation   |  | Taiwan, ROC                   |  | 99.99%                                        
|Hsun Chieh Investment Co., Ltd.       |  | Taiwan, ROC                   |  | 99.97%                                        
|UMC Capital Corporation               |  | Cayman Islands                |  | 100%                                          
|UMC Group (USA)                       |  | California, USA               |  | 100%                                          
|UMC Japan                             |  | Japan                         |  | 51.89%                                        
|UMCi Ltd                              |  | Singapore                     |  | 80.19%                                        
|United Foundry Service, Inc.          |  | California, USA               |  | 100%                                          
|United Microdisplay Optronics Corp.   |  | Taiwan, ROC                   |  | 83.48%                                        
|United Microelectronics (Europe) B.V. |  | The Netherlands               |  | 100%                                          
|United Microelectronics Corp. (Samoa) |  | Samoa                         |  | 100%
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-50387

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Silvestre Garcia-Gonzalez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CR-483-3

______________________________

Before Wiener, Stewart, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Silvestre Garcia-Gonzalez, federal prisoner # 50704-051, appeals the 

denial of his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A). He argues that his young age at the time of the offense, the 

sentencing errors in the computation of his sentence, and his counsel’s 

ineffectiveness constituted extraordinary and compelling circumstances 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 6, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-50387 Document: 00517056995 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/06/2024
No. 23-50387

2

warranting relief. Garcia-Gonzalez also moves for the appointment of 

counsel and for discovery of sealed documents. 

The district court denied Garcia-Gonzalez’s motion on the basis that 

a balancing of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors did not warrant 

compassionate relief. Garcia-Gonzalez’s failure to challenge these findings 

constitutes an abandonment of the issue on appeal. See United States v. 

Scroggins, 599 F.3d 433, 446-47 (5th Cir. 2010); Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 

222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). To the extent Garcia-Gonzalez’s arguments are 

construed as a challenge to his conviction or original sentence, such a 

challenge is not appropriately raised on appeal from the denial of his 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion. See United States v. Escajeda, 58 F.4th 184, 187 (5th 

Cir. 2023). Lastly, to the extent that Garcia-Gonzalez seeks authorization to 

file a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, he cites no new rule of 

constitutional law made retroactive by the Supreme Court or newly 

discovered evidence that would establish by clear and convincing evidence 

his innocence. See § 2255(h). 

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. See 

United States v. Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020); United States v. 

Jackson, 27 F.4th 1088, 1093 n.8 (5th Cir. 2022). Garcia-Gonzalez’s motions 

are DENIED. 

Case: 23-50387 Document: 00517056995 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/06/2024
#### Keisha DESSELLE, et al. v. ACADIAN AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC.

No. 2012-C-0518.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 2012.

In re Acadian Ambulance Services, Inc.; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Avo-yelles, 12th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 2010-5885-A; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 11-742 C/W 11-1017.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Richard MIKKELSON, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-0206.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re Mikkelson Jr., Richard; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 173-545; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 11-67.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.