alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(a)   Exhibit 11 - COMPUTATION OF BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE AND DILUTED
                   EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                                            Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended
                                              June 30, 1999      June 30, 1999
                                               -------------     -------------
                                                   (Dollars in thousands,
                                                   except per share data)
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Net income available to common shareholders      $    2,262       $    4,375
                                                 ==========       ==========

Weighted average common shares outstanding        6,026,891        5,974,633
                                                 ==========       ==========

Basic earnings per common share                  $      .38       $      .73
                                                 ==========       ==========


DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Net income available to common shareholders      $    2,262       $    4,375
                                                 ==========       ==========

Weighted average common shares outstanding        6,026,891        5,974,633

Add:  Dilutive effects of assumed exercises of
     stock options and warrants                     305,952          351,562

Weighted average common and dilutive potential
     common shares outstanding                    6,332,843        6,326,195
                                                 ==========       ==========

Dilutive earnings per common share               $      .36       $      .69
                                                 ==========       ==========



Note:       The  share  and per  share  information  disclosed  above  have been
            retroactively  adjusted  to reflect the 10% stock  dividend  paid on
            June 30, 1999.
#### Wesley BOLTON v. SEA MAR WAREHOUSING AND LOGISTICS, INC. and ABC Insurance Company.

No. 2010-C-2730.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 4, 2011.

In re Bolton, Wesley; —Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 102-157; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-0286.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       9,128,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  669,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    740,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,604,000
<PP&E>                                      69,093,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,913,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              73,502,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       85,107,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (21,117,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                73,502,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,593,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,934,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,740,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,020,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,020,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,020,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7781 FRANK ERVIN ALTIZER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versusGEORGE DEEDS, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional Center; MARGARET WATKINS; GLEN E. CONRAD; ALAN KATZ; PAMELA ANNE SARGENT; D. A. BRAXTON, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 95-7782 FRANK ERVIN ALTIZER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE; SUPERVISOR SPRADLIN; COUNSELOR VASS; SERGEANT PAYNE; EDWARD C. MORRIS; GENE M. JOHNSON; RICHARD A. YOUNG; LONNIE M. SAUNDERS; Y. ELSWICK, Defendants - Appellees.2 No. 95-7783 FRANK ERVIN ALTIZER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE; GENE M. JOHNSON; RICHARD A. YOUNG; GEORGE DEEDS; D. A. BRAXTON; MARGRET WATKINS; MIKE SPRADLING; JAMES W. COFFEE; JULIE HALL; ALAN KATZ; PAMELA ANNE SARGENT; MARY E. SHEA, Esquire; T. P. KAGEY; GLEN E. CONRAD, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 95-7784 FRANK ERVIN ALTIZER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus R. A. YOUNG; GEORGE DEEDS; D. A. BRAXTON; R. C. METHENA, Defendants - Appellees.3 No. 95-7785 FRANK ERVIN ALTIZER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE; ALAN KATZ; PAMELA ANNE SARGENT; T. P. KAGEY; CASSANDRA HARISTON; GEORGE DEEDS; D. A. BRAXTON; MARGARET WATKINS; GENE M. JOHNSON; RICHARD A. YOUNG; PATRICK J. CURNEY; Y. ELSWICK; P. J. RICH; SUSAN COX; WANDA BARTON; J. W. BAKER; GLEN E. CONRAD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-1069-R, CA-95-1070-R, CA-95-1071-R, CA-95-1072-R, CA-95- 1073-R) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 26, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).4 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewedthe records and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Altizer v. Deeds , No. CA-95-1069-R; Altizer v. Angelone , Nos. CA-95-1070-R; CA-95-1071-R; CA-95-1073-R; Altizer v. Young , No. CA-95-1072-R (W.D. Va. Oct . 6 & 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert FRIDAY.

No. 2011-K-1456.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 20, 2012.

In re Friday, Robert; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 444225; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KA 2309.

Denied.
Exhibit 31.1



Certifications



I, J.A. Cardwell, Sr., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Petro Stopping Centers, L.P.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2004                           
|                                                
|/s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.                          
|(J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)                            
|Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President
#### Fernando Augusto GUSMAO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D09-3439.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Oct. 29, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 2, 2010.

Fernando A. Gusmao, Windermere, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Fernando Augusto Gusmao appeals from his conviction and sentence on a charge of grand theft of over $100,000. We have carefully considered each issue raised on appeal, and find no error. With respect to Gusmao’s hearsay arguments, the challenged documents were properly *94admitted under the hearsay exception for business records, section 90.803(6), Florida Statutes (2008), and the other challenged statements as admissions by a party opponent. § 90.803(18)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008).1 Next, Gusmao complains that the trial court erred by allowing checks that he wrote in the amounts of $130,000 and $160,000 to be referred to as “worthless.” Not only was there no objection to this characterization at trial, but the evidence clearly supported the description. Gus-mao’s banking records showed that he did not have sufficient funds in the accounts on which the checks were written to cover them. Finally, Gusmao argues that the State did not present sufficient evidence of his intent to commit the crime, so that his motion for judgment of acquittal should have been granted. We agree with the State that there would have been sufficient circumstantial evidence of Gusmao’s criminal intent to submit the case to the jury even without Gusmao’s admission. *See Brewer v. State,*413 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) (en banc), *rev. denied,*426 So.2d 25 (Fla.1983). Given Gusmao’s out-of-court admission to the crime, this argument completely lacks merit.2

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, LAWSON, and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

1

. On appeal, Gusmao also cites *Crawford v. Washington,*541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), as did his trial counsel below, as a basis for prohibiting testimony as to his own out-of-court admissions during trial. Since there is apparently at least one attorney who views this as a valid argument, we note that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause is in no way implicated when the state offers a defendant’s own out-of-court statements as evidence at trial.

2

. Although Gusmao testified to a more innocent explanation of events at trial, in deciding the motion for judgment of acquittal the trial court properly viewed the evidence "in the light most favorable to the state.” *L.R.W. v. State,*848 So.2d 1263, 1265-66 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
POWER OF ATTORNEY                       Exhibit (24)


We, the undersigned  directors of HSB Group, Inc., hereby  individually  appoint
Robert C.  Walker and Roberta A.  O'Brien,  and each of them  singly,  with full
power of substitution to each, our true and lawful  attorneys with full power to
them and each of them  singly,  to sign  for us in our  names in the  capacities
stated below the Form 10-K Annual Report, pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 for
HSB Group,  Inc., and any and all amendments to said Form 10-K, and generally to
do all such things in our name and on our behalf in our  capacities as directors
that will  enable the Company to comply with the  provisions  of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and all  requirements  of the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission,  which  relate to said Form 10-K and the  filing  thereof,
hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said
attorneys  or any  one of  them to said  Form  10-K  and any and all  amendments
thereto.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, this Power
of Attorney has been signed by the following  persons in the  capacities  and on
the date indicated.

(Signature)                         (Title)                        (Date)


/s/ Joel B. Alvord
Joel B. Alvord                      Director                  February  23, 1998


/s/ Colin G. Campbell
Colin G. Campbell                   Director                  February  23, 1998


/s/ Richard G. Dooley
Richard G. Dooley                   Director                  February  23, 1998


/s/ William B. Ellis
William B. Ellis                    Director                  February  23, 1998


/s/ E. James Ferland
E. James Ferland                    Director                  February  23, 1998


/s/ Simon W. Leathes
Simon W. Leathes                    Director                  February 23,  1998


/s/ Lois Dickson Rice
Lois Dickson Rice                   Director                  February  23, 1998


/s/ John M. Washburn, Jr.
John M. Washburn, Jr.               Director                  February  23, 1998


/s/ Wilson Wilde
Wilson Wilde                        Director                  February  23, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 186 (Monday, September 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59257-59258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24076]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ Docket No. ER10-2705-000]


Merchants Plaza Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

September 17, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Merchants Plaza Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 7, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an

[[Page 59258]]

eRegistration account using the eRegistration link. Select the eFiling 
link to log on and submit the intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e585b4c5d51707277707b4d6b6e6e716c6a5e787b6c7d30797168"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e5a3a0b7a6aa8b898c8b80b69095958a9791a583809786cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24076 Filed 9-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert Henry ELZY, Jr.

No. 2010-K-1281.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Elzy Jr., Robert Henry; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 106864; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KA 2263.

Denied.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements of
HSB  Group,  Inc.  on Form S-3 (File  No.  333-53059)  and Forms S-8 (File  Nos.
33-4397,  33-36519 and  333-29605)  of our report dated January 24, 2000, on our
audits  of  the  consolidated   financial  statements  and  financial  statement
schedules of HSB Group,  Inc. and its  subsidiaries  as of December 31, 1999 and
1998,  and for the three years in the period  ended  December  31,  1999,  which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
March 29, 2000
EXHIBIT 10.1(a)

                     AMENDMENT TO GOLF FACILITIES AGREEMENT

     This Amendment is entered into this 31 day of October,  1997 by SEDONA GOLF
RESORT,  L.C., an Arizona limited liability company ("SGR") and UP SEDONA, INC.,
an Arizona corporation ("Hotel Owner"). For good an valuable consideration,  the
receipt and  sufficiency  of which is hereby  acknowledged,  SGR and Hotel Owner
hereby amend that Golf Facilities Agreement dated December 19, 1996 as follows:

     1. HOTEL  GUEST  DEFINITION.  Section  2.2 of the  Agreement  is amended to
provide  that the  definition  of Hotel Guest shall also include the owner(s) of
hotel  condominium  units  ("Unit  Owners")  within the Hotel,  irrespective  of
whether the Unit Owners are then registered in the Hotel. All tee times for Unit
Owners  shall be made  through the Hotel in the same manner as made by the Hotel
for  Hotel  Guests,  and  subject  to the  same  restrictions  set  forth in the
Agreement.  In any event,  the total  number of Hotel Guest Rounds in a calendar
year shall not exceed  forty  percent  (40%) of the prior  calendar  years total
rounds.  Hotel Guest Rounds include all players in any  tournament  scheduled by
the Hotel regardless of whether such player is actually staying at the Hotel.

     2.  MISCELLANEOUS.  All  capitalized  terms not  otherwise  defined in this
Amendment  shall  have the same  meaning  as set  forth in the  Agreement.  This
Amendment may be executed in counterparts.

     3.  NO OTHER  AMENDMENTS.  Except  as  hereby  amended,  all  terms  of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this  Amendment has been entered into effective as of
the day and year first set forth above.

"SGR"                                    "HOTEL OWNER"

SEDONA GOLF RESORT, L.C., an             UP SEDONA, INC., an Arizona corporation
Arizona Limited Liability company

By:  SunCor Development Company, an      By: /s/ Elias D. Setton
     Arizona corporation, its Managing      ------------------------------------
     Member                              Its: Vice President, Hotel Development
                                             -----------------------------------
By: /s/ Tom Patrick
   -----------------------------------

Its: Vice President
    ----------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 59679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24325]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 28, 2010 / 
Notices

[[Page 59679]]



AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION


Board of Directors Meeting

Meeting: African Development Foundation, Board of Directors Meeting.

Time: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.

Place: African Development Foundation, Conference Room, 1400 I Street, 
NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005

Date: Tuesday, October 19, 2010.

Status:
    1. Open session, Tuesday, October 19, 2010, 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.; 
and
    2. Closed session, Tuesday, October 19, 2010, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m.
    Due to security requirements and limited seating, all individuals 
wishing to attend the open session of the meeting must notify Michele 
M. Rivard at (202) 673-3916 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e588978c93849781a59096848183cb828a93"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="87eaf5eef1e6f5e3c7f2f4e6e3e1a9e0e8f1">[email protected]</span></a> of your request to 
attend by 5 p.m. on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

Lloyd O. Pierson,
President & CEO, USADF.
[FR Doc. 2010-24325 Filed 9-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
583 A.2d 300

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ADRIANO PERALTA.

January 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.