alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 186 (Monday, September 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 59208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24177]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Modoc County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Modoc County Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Alturas, CA. The committee is meeting as authorized under the Secure 
Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-343) 
and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The purpose 
of the meeting is to review Resource Advisory Committee Project 
Applications.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 4, 2010, 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Modoc National Forest Office, 
Conference Room, 800 West 12th St., Alturas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly H. Anderson, Forest 
Supervisor and Designated Federal Officer, at (530) 233-8700; or 
Resource Advisory Coordinator, Stephen Riley at (530) 233-8771.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The business meeting on October 4, 2010 will 
begin at 4 p.m., at the Modoc National Forest Office, Conference Room, 
800 West 12th St., Alturas, California 96101. Agenda topics will 
include recruiting new project proposals that meet the intent of Public 
Law 110-343. Time will also be set aside for public comments at the 
beginning of the meeting.

    Dated: September 20, 2010.
Kimberly H. Anderson,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-24177 Filed 9-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1384 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1384

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 118 Minner Street in Bakersfield, California, as the ``Buck Owens 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2007

  Mr. McCarthy of California introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 118 Minner Street in Bakersfield, California, as the ``Buck Owens 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BUCK OWENS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 118 Minner Street in Bakersfield, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Buck Owens Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Buck Owens 
Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: A

- 1 Auto Body and Paint Shop, LLC v. Margaret McQuiggan

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 0 0250

- CV

Trial court case number: 1022350

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Appellee, Margaret McQuiggan , has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of

prosecution , arguing that th is appeal should be dismissed because appellant, A

- 1 Auto Body and

Paint Shop, LLC failed to timely file its brief

. We deny the motion.

On June 17, 2013, the Court granted appellant’s motion for extension of time to file

appellant’s brief, thereby extending the deadline for appellant to file its brief to June 18, 2013.

Appellant filed its brief on June 20, 2013. The Court may dis miss an appeal for want of

prosecution if an appellant fails to timely file a brief

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1). However,

because Appellant filed its brief within two days of the deadline and because app ellee has

subsequently filed her brief, we decl ine to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See id.

38.8(a)(2).

Accordingly, we deny Margaret McQuiggan’s motion to dismiss.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 30, 2013
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Frederick CONDLEY.

No. 2010-KP-2594.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2011.

In re Condley, Frederick; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. K, No. 03-6987; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-KH-765.

Denied.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Richard C. Abbott, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bay Banks of Virginia, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting: and;



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal controls;



Date: March 16, 2005



|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard C. Abbott                                                            
|Richard C. Abbott Acting Treasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer



58
#### Jeffery HAYES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D10-1033.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 4, 2011.

*385Jeffery Hayes, Lake City, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Jeffery Hayes appeals a trial court order dismissing his amended motion for post-conviction relief as untimely filed. We reverse because the trial court had earlier entered an order dismissing his original motion without prejudice to refile an amended motion on certain of the twenty-nine grounds raised, and that order contained no time limit for compliance. *See Armstrong v. State,*989 So.2d 1291 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); *Woods v. State,*963 So.2d 348 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

The only issue remaining is whether the trial court must entertain Hayes’s original motion as well as his amended motion, which did include all twenty-nine grounds as originally raised, but which was amended in part in compliance with the trial court’s order of dismissal without prejudice. We conclude that the trial court’s review should be confined to the amended motion only and not the original motion. The amended motion superseded the original one. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order of dismissal, and remand for the trial court to consider the amended motion on the merits.

*Reversed and Remanded.*

POLEN, HAZOURI and GERBER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             659
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     9252
<ALLOWANCES>                                       116
<INVENTORY>                                       2820
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 13873
<PP&E>                                           21573
<DEPRECIATION>                                    7401
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   35344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10027
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            33
<OTHER-SE>                                       17021
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     35344
<SALES>                                          17785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 17785
<CGS>                                             4330
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 17372
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3984)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1489)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2495)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2495)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.76)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Land O'Lakes, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Daniel Knutson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  March 30, 2004
                                                    By  /s/ Daniel Knutson
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    Daniel Knutson
                                                    Senior Vice President
                                                    and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.67

                   SIXTH AMENDMENT TO COST SHARING NATIONAL
                                 IRU AGREEMENT

     THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT TO COST SHARING NATIONAL IRU AGREEMENT ("Amendment")
is made and entered into as of the 31st day of August 2000, by and between LEVEL
3 COMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Grantor") and
SPLITROCK SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Grantee"). This Amendment
modified and amends that certain Costs Sharing National IRU Agreement dated
April 26, 1999 between Grantor and Grantee (the "Agreement").

     Grantor and Grantee hereby agree as follows:

1. Amendment. Grantor and Grantee hereby amend Section 3.02 of the Agreement by
   ---------
   deleting the second sentence in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof
   the following sentence:

               The Option may be exercised by Grantee by written
               notice to Grantor referring specifically to this
               Section 3.02 delivered at any time prior to September
               22, 2000 (the "Option Period"); provided, Grantor may,
               in its sole discretion, extend the Option Period if
               Grantor determines that fibers are available in the
               Grantor Cable to serve as the Option Fibers.

2. Ratification. Except as amended by the First through Fifth and this Sixth
   ------------
   Amendment, the original terms and provisions of the Agreement shall continue
   in full force and effect and the Agreement, as amended by the First through
   Fifth, and this Sixth Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed.

3. Counterparts. This Sixth Amendment may be executed in counterparts and may be
   ------------
   delivered by facsimile transmission.


LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC                 SPLITROCK SERVICES, INC.


By: _____________________________           By: ____________________________

Title: __________________________           Title: _________________________
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-0XLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MRO Software, Inc., (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
President & Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President of Finance &
Administration, CFO & Treasurer of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge
and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/  Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.                    /s/   Peter J. Rice
-----------------------------------            -------------------
Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.                         Peter J. Rice
President & Chief Executive Officer            Executive Vice President, Finance
Date: August 9, 2005                           & Administration, CFO & Treasurer
                                               Date: August 9, 2005

Page 31
#### Michael BROUSSARD v. COUNTRY CLUB AUTO REPAIR.

No. 2011-C-0475.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2011.

In re Country Club Auto Repair; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certio-rari and/or Review Office of Workers’ Compensation Dist. 03, No. 07-08030; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-1116.

Denied.
##### 



Exhibit 13.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ Jackson HuName:
    Jackson HuTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer 
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-10311

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

LOUIS LAVARIS, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 6:16-CR-26-1 

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Louis Lavaris, Jr., appeals his conviction and the 96-month sentence 

imposed after he pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. 

He asserts that the Government failed to state a federal offense in his 

indictment because 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional on its face in that 

the element “in or affecting commerce” cannot be satisfied merely by the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 6, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-10311 Document: 00514186242 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/06/2017
No. 17-10311

2 

possession of a firearm that had traveled in interstate commerce at some point 

in time. 

As Lavaris concedes, his argument is foreclosed by United States v. 

Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513 (5th Cir. 2001), in which we held that “the 

constitutionality of § 922(g) is not open to question,” id. at 518 (internal 

quotation marks and citation omitted), and United States v. Luna, 165 F.3d 

316, 319-22 (5th Cir. 1999), in which we concluded that § 922(j) was similar to 

§ 922(g) and the phrase “shipped or transported in, interstate or foreign 

commerce,” provided “the requisite nexus to commerce” to allow Congress to 

exercise its powers under the Commerce Clause. Accordingly, Lavaris’s motion 

for summary disposition is GRANTED and the judgment is AFFIRMED. 

 Case: 17-10311 Document: 00514186242 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/06/2017
## No. 0 3

- 13

- 00 286

- CV



## In the Third Court of Appeals Austin , Texas

R ICHARD P ATRICK F AGERBERG ,
Appellant

V

. S TEVE M ADDEN , L TD ., SXSW, I NC ., AND W3 E VENT S PECIALISTS , I NC .,
Appellees

A PPEAL F ROM C AUSE N O

. D

- 1

- GN

- 13

- 000933 261 ST D ISTRICT C OURT OF T RAVIS C OUNTY , T EXAS H ON

. S U Z ANNE C OVINGTON P RESIDING

SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:
Appellant Richard Patrick Fagerberg file s this motion requesting a two

- day

extension of time for filing the motion for rehearing submitted to the Court on

August 21, 2015. Appellant respectfully shows:

1. On July 3, 2015, this Court issued an opinion and judgment affirming

the trial c ourt’s summary judgments favoring all three appellants. Appellant ACCEPTED 03-13-00286-CV 6630108 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/24/2015 5:03:21 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK2 received a 30

- day extension of time

— to August 19, 2015

— for filing any motion

for rehearing or for en banc reconsideration.

2. The new due date was miscalendared in the undersigned counsel’s

off ice. Instead of reflecting August 19, 2015 as the new due date, the calendar

reflected a due date of August 21, 2015. Counsel thus erroneously believed the

motion to be timely when filed.

3. Appellant asks the Court to extend his time for filing his motion fo r

rehearing by two days so as to render the recent filing timely.

CONCLUSION AND PRAYE R

Appell ant respectfully request s that the Court grant this motion , thus making

his motion for rehearing against Appellee W3 Event Specialists, Inc. due on

August 2 1 , 2015. Appell ant request s all other appropriate relief to which he is

entitled.

Respectfully submitted,



### S MITH 

### L AW 

### G ROUP 

### LLLP

/s/D. Todd Smith D. Todd Smith State Bar No. 00797451 todd@appealsplus.com 1250 Capital of Texas Highway South Three Cielo Cent er, Suite 601 Austin, Texas 78746 (512) 439

- 3230 (512) 439

- 3232 (fax)

Counsel for Appellant3 CERTIFICATE OF CONFE RENCE

In compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5), I certify

that I conferred with John Dailey, lead appellate counsel for Appellee W3 Event

Specialists

, who informed me that any extension of time to file a motion for

rehearing would be opposed.

/s/D. Todd Smith D. Todd Smith4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On August 24 2015, in compliance with Texas Rule of Appell ate Procedure

9.5, I served this document by e

- service, e

- mail, and/or mail to :
Steven J. Knight C HAMBERLAIN , H RDLICKA , W HITE , W ILLIAMS & A UGHTRY 1200 Smith Street, Suite 1400 Houston, Texas 77002

- 4496 C

ounsel for Appellee Steve Madden, Ltd.

Peter D. Kenn edy G RAVES , D OUGHERTY , H EARON & M OODY , P.C. 401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2200 Austin, Texas 78701 Counsel for Appellee SXSW, Inc.

John T. Dailey A LLEN , S TEIN & D URBIN , P.C. 6243 IH

- 1 0 West, 7th Floor P. O. Box 101507 San Antonio, Texas 78201 Counsel for Appellee W3Event Specialists, Inc.

/s/D. Todd Smith D. Todd Smith