alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-141042) pertaining to the Tm Bioscience Corporation Share Option Plan, in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-134450) pertaining to the Luminex Corporation 2006 Equity IncentivePlan and the Luminex Corporation 2006 Management Stock Purchase Plan, in the Registration Statement(Form S-8 No. 333-46686) pertaining to the 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Luminex Corporation, inthe Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-87918) pertaining to the 2001 Broad-Based Stock OptionPlan of Luminex Corporation and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-118772) pertainingto the Balthrop Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement of Luminex Corporation of our reports datedMarch 12, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Luminex Corporation and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Luminex Corporation, included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007./s/ Ernst & Young LLP
#### STATE ex rel. Edward McGARY v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0414.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re McGary, Edward; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 53-149; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2009 KW 2099.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; *State v. Parker,*98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. See also La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D).
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, PehongChen, the Chief Executive Officer of BroadVision, Inc. (the “Company”) andWilliam E. Meyer, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifythat, to the best of their knowledge:

 

**1.****                                     **TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2004, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the“Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

**2.****                                     **Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as ofthe 9th day of August, 2004.

 

 
|   | /s/ Pehong Chen         |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Pehong Chen             |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ William E. Meyer    |
|   | William E. Meyer        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Waypoint Financial Corp.
(the "Company") for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
C. Pearson, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ Charles C. Pearson, Jr.
---------------------------
Charles C. Pearson, Jr.,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

March 28, 2003

                                       90
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, James S.J. Manuso,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SuperGen, Inc.on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of SuperGen, Inc.
|          | By:      | /s/ JAMES S.J. MANUSO                   |
|----------|----------|-----------------------------------------|
|     | Name:    | James S.J. Manuso                       |
|     | Title:   | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
| * * | * * | *(Principal Executive Officer)*         |

 

I, Michael Molkentin,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SuperGen, Inc.on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of SuperGen, Inc.
|        | By:    | /s/ MICHAEL  MOLKENTIN                         |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Michael Molkentin                              |
|   | Title: | *Chief Financial Officer*                      |
|   |   | *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
EXHIBIT 13.2 - CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Allen Hugli, the Chief Financial Officer of Reynolds Group Holdings Limited (the "Company"), certify that:





(a)    The annual report of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(b)    The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Allen HugliAllen HugliChief Financial OfficerFebruary 14, 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1127263
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8458
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      10166
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1145887
<PP&E>                                          385630
<DEPRECIATION>                                   32447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1936897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           463799
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    3872843
<COMMON>                                          3344
<OTHER-SE>                                   (3265589)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1936897
<SALES>                                        1259214
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1259214
<CGS>                                          1005338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2497734
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               97379
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2341237)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (2341237)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (2341237)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.27)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Forms S-8 No. 333-50811), pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, the 1997 
Performance Stock Option Plan, the 1997 Non-Employee Directors Option Plan 
and the 1997 Amended Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Faroudja, Inc., of our 
report dated January 25, 1999, with respect to the financial statements and 
schedule of Faroudja, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the 
year ended December 31, 1998.

                                       /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 29, 1999


                                       -47-
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Blue Rhino
Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Mark Castaneda, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                    /s/ Mark Castaneda
                                                    ------------------------
                                                    Mark Castaneda
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                    October 21, 2003
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D707]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     COMMITTEE MEETINGS FOR FRIDAY,

                              JUNE 9, 1995

        (Committee meetings are open unless otherwise indicated)

                                 Senate

  Committee on Foreign Relations, to hold a closed briefing on the 
situation in Bosnia, 10:30 a.m., S-407, Capitol.
                                 House

  No committee meetings are scheduled.
```
#### James FLEISCHMAN, Petitioner, v. Walter A. McNEIL, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 1D10-5032.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 7, 2011.

James Fleischman, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Maricruz R. Fincher, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the circuit court has disposed of the petition filed below, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.

KAHN, PADOVANO, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1547 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1547

 To prohibit the sale of certain inefficient light bulbs, and require 
  the development of a plan for increasing the use of more efficient 
                light bulbs by consumers and businesses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2007

  Ms. Harman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the sale of certain inefficient light bulbs, and require 
  the development of a plan for increasing the use of more efficient 
                light bulbs by consumers and businesses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

    (a) Regulations.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall issue regulations--
            (1) prohibiting the sale of light bulbs that emit less than 
        60 lumens per watt, effective January 1, 2012;
            (2) prohibiting the sale of light bulbs that emit less than 
        90 lumens per watt, effective January 1, 2016; and
            (3) prohibiting the sale of light bulbs that emit less than 
        120 lumens per watt, effective January 1, 2020.
    (b) Exemptions.--The regulations issued under subsection (a) shall 
include procedures for the Secretary to provide exemptions to the 
prohibition. The Secretary may provide such an exemption only in cases 
where the Secretary finds, after a hearing and opportunity for public 
comment, that it is not technically feasible to serve a specialized 
lighting application, such as a military, medical, or public safety 
application, using bulbs that meet the requirements of subsection (a). 
Exemptions provided under this subsection shall expire after 2 years. 
No exemption may be provided under this subsection for general 
illumination applications.
    (c) Civil Penalty.--The Secretary of Energy shall include in 
regulations under this section a schedule of appropriate civil 
penalties for violations of the prohibition under this section. Such 
penalties shall be in an amount sufficient to ensure compliance with 
this Act.
    (d) Definition.--For purposes of this Act, the term ``general 
illumination'' means lighting designed to provide a substantially 
uniform level of luminance throughout an area exclusive of any 
provision for special or local requirements.

SEC. 2. PLAN.

    Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Energy shall transmit to the Congress a plan for 
encouraging and providing incentives for the use of more efficient 
light bulbs by consumers and businesses.
                                 <all>
```
ALLONGE

      THIS ALLONGE, by Linsang Manufacturing, Inc., the undersigned (the
"Obligor"), and Fuel Centers, Inc. (the "Holder") is to be attached to and made
a part of that certain Convertible Note, made by Obligor to Holder, dated June
26, 2002, for a principal amount of $2,000,000 (the "Note").

      NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration acknowledged to have
been received, Obligor and Holder agree to change the Maturity of the Note as
follows:

      1. Paragraph number 1 of the Note is deleted in its entirety.

      2. New Paragraph 1 shall be substituted as follows:

            "The principal balance of the Note shall be payable, together with
all interest thereon, on or before January 15, 2003, subject to Section 4
herein. Upon the payment in full of the outstanding principal and all accrued
but unpaid interest and charges (as referenced in Section 5 below) thereon, this
Note shall be surrendered to the Obligor for cancellation."

      3. This Allonge shall be attached to the Note and made a part thereof for
all purposes as if executed on the date of the Note. Holder's signature below is
affixed to evidence its agreement with the provisions of this Allonge.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Obligor and Holder's signatures and seals have
been affixed effective as of October 15, 2002.

                                       LINSANG MANUFACTURING, INC.
                                         a Delaware corporation

(CORPORATE SEAL)                       By: /s/ Luis P. Negrete
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Title: President


                                       FUEL CENTERS, INC.
                                         a Nevada corporation

(CORPORATE SEAL)                       By: John R. Muellerleile
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Title: President
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20202 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN ANTONIO CONTRERAS, Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-97-CV-882

--------------------- February 4, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Federal prisoner Juan Antonio Contreras seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He renews each of the claims raised in his § 2255 motion. Contreras has also filed a motion to supplement his COA request, which motion is GRANTED.No. 98-20202 - 2 - Although some of Contreras’ claims may be barred, the record in the instant case does not conclusively show that Contreras is entitled to no relief. Thus, the district court erred in failing to provide findings and conclusions in support of its denial of § 2255 relief. See United States v. Daly , 823 F.2d 871, 872 (5th Cir. 1987); United States v. Edwards , 711 F.2d 633, 633 (5th cir. 1983). COA is therefore GRANTED, the district court’s order is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED. On remand, the district court should provide its findings and conclusions of law. MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT GRANTED; COA GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED.
#### Caridad M. OLIVA, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. 5D10-2829.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 17, 2011.

Caridad M. Oliva, Ocklawaha, pro se.

Louis A. Gutierrez, Tallahassee, for Ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Caridad M. Oliva appeals an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming the appeal referee’s finding that Ms. Oliva was disqualified from receiving benefits because she was not “able to work and available for work” as required by section 443.091(l)(c)l., Florida Statutes (2010). We affirm.

*891The determination that an employee is, or is not, able and available for work is a question of fact. *See Brown v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n,*820 So.2d 457, 458 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). An appeal referee’s factual determination is ordinarily presumed to be correct. *Smith v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n,*823 So.2d 873, 874 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). Thus, if there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the appeal referee’s findings, this Court must affirm. *Brown,*820 So.2d at 458. The record before us fully supports the finding of the referee. We cannot reweigh the evidence. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 13 - 00406 - CV R. WAYNE JOHNSON APPELLANT V. STEPHEN MARSH APPELLEE

---------- FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant, who has been determined to be a vexatious litigant subject to a pre - filing order under section 11.101(a) of the civil practice and remedies code, 2

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 2 We take judicial notice of th e list maintained by the Office of Court Administration at http://www.txcourts.gov/oca/v exatious l itigants. asp . See Merritt v. Davis , No. 05 - 13 - 00 819 - CV, 2013 WL 4459024 , at *1 n.1 (Te x. App.

— Dallas Aug. 19, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) ; Douglas v. Am. Title Co. , 196 S.W.3d 876, 878 n.2 (Tex. App.

–– Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.).2 is attempting to appeal from a trial court order dismissing his suit for failure to obtain a pre - filing orde r from the local administrative judge

. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 11.101(a) (West Supp. 2013). Likewise, appellant has failed to obtain a pre - filing order before filing this appeal, despite our January 13, 2014 notice giving him ten days to obtai n such an order or face dismissal. See id. § 11.103(a) (West Supp. 2013)

. Section 11.103(a) of the civil practice and remedies code provides that “ a clerk of a court may not file a litigation, original proceeding, appeal, or other claim presented, pro se, by a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order under Section 11.101 unless the litigant obtains an order from the appropriate local administrative judge

. . . permitting the filing. ” Id. Appellant failed to obtain a pre filing order from the local administrative judge before filing this appeal; he also failed to obtain such an order after notice from this court. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id. ; Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c); In re Johnson , No. 03 - 14 - 00006 - CV, 2014 WL 411763, at *1 (Tex. App

. –– Austin Jan. 31, 2014, orig. proceeding ) (mem. op.) ; Kastner v. Fulco , No. 01 - 13 - 00 100 - CV, 2013 WL 6157392 , at *1

– 2 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 21, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) ; Merritt v. Davis , No. 05 - 13 - 00 819 - CV, 2013 WL 4459024 , at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Aug. 19, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) ; Minnfee v. Currietu , No. 13 - 13 - 00 246 - CV, 2013 WL 2949348 , at *1 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi June 13, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) ; Scott v. Morgan , Nos. 14 - 12 - 00 268 - CV, 14 - 12 - 00 269 - CV, 2013 WL 2149805 , at *1 (Tex. App

. — Houston [14th Dist.] May 16, 2013, no pet.) (mem.3 op.) ; Minnfee v. Williams , No. 09 - 12 - 00 328 - CV, 2012 WL 4713721 , at *1 (Tex. App.

— Beaumont Oct. 4, 2012, no pet.) (mem

. op.). PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. DELIVERED: March 13, 2014