Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Notices 57493 

approval number (2577–0264) and 

should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, 

Office of Management and Budget, New 

Executive Office Building, Washington, 

DC 20503; fax: 202–395–5806. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Leroy McKinney, Jr., Reports 

Management Officer, QDAM, 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20410; e-mail Leroy 

McKinney, Jr. at 

Leroy.McKinneyJr@hud.gov or telephone 

(202) 402–5564. This is not a toll-free 

number. Copies of available documents 

submitted to OMB may be obtained 

from Mr. McKinney. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice informs the public that the 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development has submitted to OMB a 

request for approval of the Information 

collection described below. This notice 

is soliciting comments from members of 

the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information to: (1) Evaluate whether the 

proposed collection of information is 

necessary for the proper performance of 

the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; (2) Evaluate the 

accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information; (3) Enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and (4) Minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond; including 

through the use of appropriate 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

This notice also lists the following 

information: 

Title of Proposal: American Recovery 

and Reinvestment Act; Public and 

Indian Housing Grants Reporting. 

OMB Approval Number: 2577–0264. 

Form Numbers: N/A. 

Description of the Need for the 

Information and Its Proposed Use: The 

Public Housing Capital Fund, Assisted 

Housing Stability and Energy and Green 

retrofit Investment program, Indian 

Community Development Block Grant 

Program, Native American Housing 

Block Grants, and Native Hawaiian 

Housing Block Grants must provide 

information to HUD for the reporting 

requirements of HUD ARRA Section 

1512 (‘‘Recovery Act’’) grants. Section 

1512 of the Recovery Act details 

reporting requirements for the recipients 

of Recovery Act funding. Recipients are 

to report on the obligation and 

expenditure of Recovery Act funding, 

details of the projects on which those 

funds have been obligated and 

expended, an evaluation of the 

completion status of projects, and the 

number of jobs created and jobs retained 

by the project. 

Frequency of Submission: Annually. 

Number of 

respondents 

Annual 

responses × Hours per response = Burden hours 

Reporting Burden .............................................................................. 5,500 22,000 .... 4 .... 90,222 

Total Estimated Burden Hours: 

90,222. 

Status: Extension of a previously 

approved collection. 

Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 35, as 

amended. 

Leroy McKinney, Jr., 

Departmental Reports Management Officer, 

Office of the Chief Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23569 Filed 9–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[AA–6661–F; LLAK965000–L14100000– 

KC0000–P] 

Alaska Native Claims Selection 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of decision approving 

lands for conveyance. 

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 

2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 

the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 

will issue an appealable decision 

approving the conveyance of surface 

estate for certain lands to Eklutna, Inc., 

pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims 

Settlement Act. The subsurface estate in 

these lands will be conveyed to Cook 

Inlet Region, Inc. when the surface 

estate is conveyed to Eklutna, Inc. The 

lands are in the vicinity of Birchwood, 

Alaska, and are located in: 

Seward Meridian, Alaska 

T. 15 N., R. 1 W., 

Secs. 5 and 7. 

Containing approximately 69 acres. 

Notice of the decision will also be 

published four times in the Anchorage 

Daily News. 

DATES: Any party claiming a property 

interest in the lands affected by the 

decision may appeal the decision within 

the following time limits: 

1. Unknown parties, parties unable to 

be located after reasonable efforts have 

been expended to locate, parties who 

fail or refuse to sign their return receipt, 

and parties who receive a copy of the 

decision by regular mail which is not 

certified, return receipt requested, shall 

have until October 21, 2010 to file an 

appeal. 

2. Parties receiving service of the 

decision by certified mail shall have 30 

days from the date of receipt to file an 

appeal. 

Parties who do not file an appeal in 

accordance with the requirements of 43 

CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed 

to have waived their rights. 

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may 

be obtained from: 

Bureau of Land Management, Alaska 

State Office, 222 West Seventh 

Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 

99513–7504. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

BLM by phone at 907–271–5960, by email at ak.blm.conveyance@blm.gov, or 

by telecommunication device (TTD) 

through the Federal Information Relay 

Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339, 24 

hours a day, 7 days a week. 

Christy Favorite, 

Land Law Examiner, Land Transfer 

Adjudication II Branch. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23466 Filed 9–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–JA–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

Notice of Inventory Completion: 

Department of Anthropology & Ethnic 

Studies, University of Nevada Las 

Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice. 

Notice is here given in accordance 

with the Native American Graves 

Protection and Repatriation Act 

(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the 

completion of an inventory of human 

remains and an associated funerary 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
57494 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Notices 

object in the possession of the 

Department of Anthropology & Ethnic 

Studies, University of Nevada Las 

Vegas, Las Vegas, NV. The human 

remains and associated funerary object 

were removed from an unknown 

location in northern Nevada and from 

Churchill, Douglas, Lincoln, Pershing, 

and Nye Counties, NV. 

This notice is published as part of the 

National Park Service’s administrative 

responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 

U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in 

this notice are the sole responsibility of 

the museum, institution, or Federal 

agency that has control of the Native 

American human remains and 

associated funerary object. The National 

Park Service is not responsible for the 

determinations in this notice. 

A detailed assessment of the human 

remains was made by the Department of 

Anthropology & Ethnic Studies, 

University of Nevada Las Vegas, 

professional staff in consultation with 

representatives of the Great Basin InterTribal NAGPRA Coalition, a nonFederally recognized Indian group, 

which represents the Inter-Tribal 

Council of Nevada, a non-Federally 

recognized Indian group, and the 

following Federally-recognized Indian 

tribes: Alturas Indian Rancheria, 

California; Battle Mountain Shoshone 

Tribe (Constituent Band of the Te-Moak 

Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of 

Nevada); Big Pine Paiute Band of Owens 

Valley Paiute Shoshone Indians of the 

Big Pine Reservation, California; 

Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony of 

California; Burns Paiute Tribe, 

California; Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of 

the Chemehuevi Reservation, California; 

Duckwater Shoshone Tribe of the 

Duckwater Reservation, Nevada; Ely 

Shoshone Tribe of Nevada; Las Vegas 

Tribe of Paiute Indians of the Las Vegas 

Indian Colony, Nevada; Lovelock Paiute 

Tribe of the Lovelock Indian Colony, 

Nevada; Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the 

Bishop Community of the Bishop 

Colony, California; Paiute-Shoshone 

Tribe of the Fallon Reservation and 

Colony, Nevada; Reno-Sparks Indian 

Colony, Nevada; Shoshone-Paiute 

Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation, 

Nevada; South Fork Band (Constituent 

Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western 

Shoshone Indians of Nevada); 

Susanville Indian Rancheria, California; 

Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone 

Indians of Nevada; Yerington Paiute 

Tribe of the Yerington Colony & 

Campbell Ranch, Nevada; and Yomba 

Shoshone Tribe of the Yomba 

Reservation, Nevada. Direct 

consultation was made with the 

Duckwater Shoshone Tribe of the 

Duckwater Reservation, Nevada; PaiuteShoshone Tribe of the Fallon 

Reservation and Colony, Nevada; and 

Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of the 

Pyramid Lake Reservation, Nevada. 

At an unknown date, human remains 

representing a minimum of one 

individual were removed from northern 

Nevada (AHUR 0119A). At an unknown 

date, the human remains were donated 

to the Department of Anthropology. No 

known individual was identified. No 

associated funerary objects are present. 

Analysis determined that the human 

remains are that of a pre-contact or early 

historic Native American adult male. No 

additional information is available 

regarding the circumstances 

surrounding removal. 

In 1989, human remains representing 

a minimum of one individual were 

collected from Lovelock, Pershing 

County, NV, by the under-sheriff for that 

area (AHUR 120C). No known 

individual was identified. No associated 

funerary objects are present. 

Analysis determined that the human 

remains are that of a pre-contact or early 

historic Native American adult. No 

additional information is available 

regarding the circumstances 

surrounding removal. 

On April 11, 1984, human remains 

representing a minimum of one 

individual were removed from highway 

SR 206 near Wally’s Hot Springs, south 

of the town of Genoa, Douglas County, 

NV (AHUR 531). Records indicate that 

skull fragments were observed resting 

on the ground by a Nevada Department 

of Transportation (NDOT) District II 

maintenance crew. Following this 

discovery, two NDOT archeologists 

surveyed the immediate area and 

concluded that the skull fragments had 

washed through a culvert that drained 

into a shallow wash. A subsequent 

survey, which was conducted uphill 

from the initial discovery, found 

additional human remains. No known 

individual was identified. No associated 

funerary objects are present. 

Analysis determined that the human 

remains are that of a pre-contact or early 

historic Native American adult female. 

On June 15, 1984, human remains 

representing a minimum of one 

individual were removed from a canal 

bank near Crystal Springs, Lincoln 

County, NV (FHUR 26). Records 

indicate that these remains were found 

by Raymond Phelps, while he was 

poking at the mud with a stick. The 

human remains were then excavated by 

officers from the Lincoln County 

Sheriff’s Department and examined by 

the coroner, Dr. Sheldon Green. Dr. 

Green subsequently turned the remains 

over to the Department of Anthropology 

& Ethnic Studies, University of Nevada 

Las Vegas. No known individual was 

identified. No associated funerary 

objects are present. 

Analysis determined that the human 

remains are that of a pre-contact or early 

historic Native American adult female, 

approximately 27 years of age. 

At an unknown date, human remains 

representing a minimum of one 

individual were removed from Madison 

Socke’s Ranch, Nye County, NV (FHUR 

35). No known individual was 

identified. The one associated funerary 

object is a clay pipe. 

No additional information is available 

regarding the circumstances 

surrounding removal. Radiocarbon 

analysis has indicated that the human 

remains date to between 1630 and 1440 

B.C., and analysis determined that the 

remains are of an adult male. The pipe 

is similar in style to that used by 

prehistoric Great Basin Native 

Americans. 

At an unknown date, human remains 

representing a minimum of one 

individual were removed from near the 

town of Fallon, Churchill County, NV 

(FHUR 36). Records indicate that the 

human remains were donated by a Mrs. 

Allen to the Department of 

Anthropology & Ethnic Studies, 

University of Nevada Las Vegas. No 

known individual was identified. No 

associated funerary objects are present. 

Analysis determined that the human 

remains are that of a pre-contact or early 

historic Native American adult, 

probably female, and 45 years or more 

of age. 

Archeological, linguistic, and oral 

historical evidence suggests that the 

geographical area where the abovementioned human remains were found 

was occupied by Western Shoshone and 

Paiute groups during pre-contact and 

early historic times. Therefore, museum 

officials reasonably believe the human 

remains and associated funerary object 

to be culturally affiliated to Western 

Shoshone and Paiute Indian tribes. 

Descendants of the Western Shoshone 

and Paiute are represented by the 

Alturas Indian Rancheria, California; 

Battle Mountain Shoshone Tribe 

(Constituent Band of the Te-Moak Tribe 

of Western Shoshone Indians of 

Nevada); Big Pine Paiute Band of Owens 

Valley Paiute Shoshone Indians of the 

Big Pine Reservation, California; 

Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony of 

California; Burns Paiute Tribe, 

California; Cedarville Rancheria, 

California; Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of 

the Chemehuevi Reservation, California; 

Confederated Tribes of the Goshute 

Reservation, Nevada and Utah; Death 

Valley Timibi-Sha Shoshone Band of 

California; Duckwater Shoshone Tribe 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Notices 57495 

of the Duckwater Reservation, Nevada; 

Elko Band (Constituent Band of the TeMoak Tribe of Western Shoshone 

Indians of Nevada); Ely Shoshone Tribe 

of Nevada; Fort Independence Indian 

Community of Paiute Indians of the Fort 

Independence Reservation, California; 

Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone 

Tribes of the Fort McDermitt Indian 

Reservation, Arizona; Las Vegas Tribe of 

Paiute Indians of the Las Vegas Indian 

Colony, Nevada; Lovelock Paiute Tribe 

of the Lovelock Indian Colony, Nevada; 

Moapa Band of Paiute Indians of the 

Moapa River Indian Reservation, 

Nevada; Northwestern Band of 

Shoshoni Nation of Utah (Washakie); 

Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah; PaiuteShoshone Indians of the Bishop 

Community of the Bishop Colony, 

California; Paiute-Shoshone Tribe of the 

Fallon Reservation and Colony, Nevada; 

Paiute-Shoshone Tribe of the Lone Pine 

Community of the Lone Pine 

Reservation, California; Pyramid Lake 

Paiute Tribe of the Pyramid Lake 

Reservation, Nevada; Reno-Sparks 

Indian Colony, Nevada; San Juan 

Southern Paiute Tribe of Arizona; 

Shoshone Tribe of the Wind River 

Reservation, Wyoming; ShoshoneBannock Tribes of the Fort Hall 

Reservation of Idaho; Shoshone-Paiute 

Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation, 

Nevada; South Fork Band (Constituent 

Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western 

Shoshone Indians of Nevada); Summit 

Lake Paiute Tribe of Nevada; Susanville 

Indian Rancheria, California; Te-Moak 

Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of 

Nevada; Utu Utu Gwaitu Paiute Tribe of 

the Benton Paiute Reservation, 

California; Walker River Paiute Tribe of 

the Walker River Reservation, Nevada; 

Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California; 

Wells Band (Constituent Band of the TeMoak Tribe of Western Shoshone 

Indians of Nevada); Winnemucca Indian 

Colony of Nevada; Yerington Paiute 

Tribe of the Yerington Colony & 

Campbell Ranch, Nevada; and Yomba 

Shoshone Tribe of the Yomba 

Reservation, Nevada. 

The Paiute-Shoshone Tribe of the 

Fallon Reservation and Colony, Nevada, 

have made a claim for the human 

remains and associated funerary object 

on behalf of the Great Basin Inter-Tribal 

NAGPRA Coalition, a non-federally 

recognized Indian group, and its 

members of federally-recognized Indian 

tribes. 

Officials of the Department of 

Anthropology & Ethnic Studies, 

University of Nevada Las Vegas, have 

determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 

3001(9), the human remains described 

above represent the physical remains of 

six individuals of Native American 

ancestry. Officials of the Department of 

Anthropology & Ethnic Studies, 

University of Nevada Las Vegas, also 

have determined that, pursuant to 25 

U.S.C. 3001(3)(A), the one object 

described above is reasonably believed 

to have been placed with or near 

individual human remains at the time of 

death or later as part of the death rite 

or ceremony. Lastly, officials of the 

Department of Anthropology & Ethnic 

Studies, University of Nevada Las 

Vegas, have determined that, pursuant 

to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there is a 

relationship of shared group identity 

that can be reasonably traced between 

the Native American human remains 

and associated funerary object and the 

Alturas Indian Rancheria, California; 

Battle Mountain Shoshone Tribe; Big 

Pine Paiute Band of Owens Valley 

Paiute Shoshone Indians of the Big Pine 

Reservation, California; Bridgeport 

Paiute Indian Colony of California; 

Burns Paiute Tribe, California; 

Cedarville Rancheria, California; 

Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the 

Chemehuevi Reservation, California; 

Confederated Tribes of the Goshute 

Reservation, Nevada and Utah; Death 

Valley Timibi-Sha Shoshone Band of 

California; Duckwater Shoshone Tribe 

of the Duckwater Reservation, Nevada; 

Elko Band; Ely Shoshone Tribe of 

Nevada; Fort Independence Indian 

Community of Paiute Indians of the Fort 

Independence Reservation, California; 

Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone 

Tribes of the Fort McDermitt Indian 

Reservation, Arizona; Las Vegas Tribe of 

Paiute Indians of the Las Vegas Indian 

Colony, Nevada; Lovelock Paiute Tribe 

of the Lovelock Indian Colony, Nevada; 

Moapa Band of Paiute Indians of the 

Moapa River Indian Reservation, 

Nevada; Northwestern Band of 

Shoshoni Nation of Utah (Washakie); 

Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah; PaiuteShoshone Indians of the Bishop 

Community of the Bishop Colony, 

California; Paiute-Shoshone Tribe of the 

Fallon Reservation and Colony, Nevada; 

Paiute-Shoshone Tribe of the Lone Pine 

Community of the Lone Pine 

Reservation, California; Pyramid Lake 

Paiute Tribe of the Pyramid Lake 

Reservation, Nevada; Reno-Sparks 

Indian Colony, Nevada; San Juan 

Southern Paiute Tribe of Arizona; 

Shoshone Tribe of the Wind River 

Reservation, Wyoming; ShoshoneBannock Tribes of the Fort Hall 

Reservation of Idaho; Shoshone-Paiute 

Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation, 

Nevada; South Fork Band; Summit Lake 

Paiute Tribe of Nevada; Susanville 

Indian Rancheria, California; Te-Moak 

Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of 

Nevada; Utu Utu Gwaitu Paiute Tribe of 

the Benton Paiute Reservation, 

California; Walker River Paiute Tribe of 

the Walker River Reservation, Nevada; 

Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California; 

Wells Band; Winnemucca Indian 

Colony of Nevada; Yerington Paiute 

Tribe of the Yerington Colony & 

Campbell Ranch, Nevada; and Yomba 

Shoshone Tribe of the Yomba 

Reservation, Nevada. 

Representatives of any other Indian 

tribe that believes itself to be culturally 

affiliated with the human remains and 

associated funerary object should 

contact Dr. Karen Harry, Department of 

Anthropology & Ethnic Study, 

University of Nevada Las Vegas, 4505 

Maryland Parkway, Box 455003, Las 

Vegas, NV 89154–5003, telephone (702) 

895–2534, before October 21, 2010. 

Repatriation of the human remains and 

associated funerary object to the PaiuteShoshone Tribe of the Fallon 

Reservation and Colony, Nevada, 

representing the Great Basin Inter-Tribal 

NAGPRA Coalition, a non-Federally 

recognized Indian group, and its 

members, may proceed after that date if 

no additional claimants come forward. 

The Department of Anthropology & 

Ethnic Studies, University of Nevada 

Las Vegas, is responsible for notifying 

officials of the Alturas Indian Rancheria, 

California; Battle Mountain Shoshone 

Tribe; Big Pine Paiute Band of Owens 

Valley Paiute Shoshone Indians of the 

Big Pine Reservation, California; 

Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony of 

California; Burns Paiute Tribe, 

California; Cedarville Rancheria, 

California; Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of 

the Chemehuevi Reservation, California; 

Confederated Tribes of the Goshute 

Reservation, Nevada and Utah; Death 

Valley Timibi-Sha Shoshone Band of 

California; Duckwater Shoshone Tribe 

of the Duckwater Reservation, Nevada; 

Elko Band; Ely Shoshone Tribe of 

Nevada; Fort Independence Indian 

Community of Paiute Indians of the Fort 

Independence Reservation, California; 

Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone 

Tribes of the Fort McDermitt Indian 

Reservation, Arizona; Las Vegas Tribe of 

Paiute Indians of the Las Vegas Indian 

Colony, Nevada; Lovelock Paiute Tribe 

of the Lovelock Indian Colony, Nevada; 

Moapa Band of Paiute Indians of the 

Moapa River Indian Reservation, 

Nevada; Northwestern Band of 

Shoshoni Nation of Utah (Washakie); 

Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah; PaiuteShoshone Indians of the Bishop 

Community of the Bishop Colony, 

California; Paiute-Shoshone Tribe of the 

Fallon Reservation and Colony, Nevada; 

Paiute-Shoshone Tribe of the Lone Pine 

Community of the Lone Pine 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
57496 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Notices 

Reservation, California; Pyramid Lake 

Paiute Tribe of the Pyramid Lake 

Reservation, Nevada; Reno-Sparks 

Indian Colony, Nevada; San Juan 

Southern Paiute Tribe of Arizona; 

Shoshone Tribe of the Wind River 

Reservation, Wyoming; ShoshoneBannock Tribes of the Fort Hall 

Reservation of Idaho; Shoshone-Paiute 

Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation, 

Nevada; South Fork; Summit Lake 

Paiute Tribe of Nevada; Susanville 

Indian Rancheria, California; Te-Moak 

Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of 

Nevada; Utu Utu Gwaitu Paiute Tribe of 

the Benton Paiute Reservation, 

California; Walker River Paiute Tribe of 

the Walker River Reservation, Nevada; 

Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California; 

Wells Band; Winnemucca Indian 

Colony of Nevada; Yerington Paiute 

Tribe of the Yerington Colony & 

Campbell Ranch, Nevada; and Yomba 

Shoshone Tribe of the Yomba 

Reservation, Nevada, that this notice has 

been published. 

Dated: September 10, 2010. 

Sherry Hutt, 

Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23412 Filed 9–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

Notice of Public Meeting, Santa Rosa 

and San Jacinto Mountains National 

Monument Advisory Committee; 

California 

AGENCIES: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior; and Forest Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Notice of public meeting. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Santa 

Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains 

National Monument Act of 2000 and the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act of 

1972, the U.S. Department of the 

Interior, Bureau of Land Management 

(BLM) and U.S. Department of 

Agriculture, Forest Service (Forest 

Service) Santa Rosa and San Jacinto 

Mountains National Monument 

Advisory Committee (MAC) will meet as 

indicated below. 

DATES: September 20, 2010. The meeting 

will start at 3 p.m. and end at 6 p.m. 

with the public comment period 

beginning at 4 p.m. The meeting will be 

held at the County of Riverside Permit 

Assistance Center, Second Floor 

Conference Room, 38686 El Cerrito 

Road, Palm Desert, California. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim 

Foote, Monument Manager, Santa Rosa 

and San Jacinto Mountains National 

Monument, 1201 Bird Center Drive, 

Palm Springs, CA 92262, or telephone 

(760) 833–7136. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The MAC 

advises the Secretary of the Interior and 

the Secretary of Agriculture, through the 

BLM and Forest Service, with respect to 

the preparation and implementation of 

a management plan for the National 

Monument. The meeting will focus on 

a variety of planning and management 

issues associated with the National 

Monument. All MAC meetings are open 

to the public. The public may present 

written comments to the MAC in 

advance of or at the meeting. Each 

formal MAC meeting will also have time 

allocated for receiving public 

comments. Depending on the number of 

persons wishing to comment and time 

available, the time for individual oral 

comments may be limited. Individuals 

who plan to attend and need special 

assistance, such as sign language 

interpretation or other reasonable 

accommodations, should contact the 

Monument Manager as provided above. 

Dated: August 24, 2010. 

John R. Kalish, 

Field Manager, Palm Springs-South Coast 

Field Office, California Desert District, Bureau 

of Land Management. 

Dated: August 24, 2010. 

Laurie Rosenthal, 

District Ranger, San Jacinto Ranger District, 

San Bernardino National Forest, Forest 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23490 Filed 9–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[WY–923–1310–FI; WYW174006] 

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of 

Terminated Oil and Gas Lease, 

Wyoming 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the 

Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as 

amended, the Bureau of Land 

Management (BLM) received a petition 

for reinstatement from EOG Resources, 

Inc. for competitive oil and gas lease 

WYW174006 for land in Converse 

County, Wyoming. The petition was 

filed on time and was accompanied by 

all the rentals due since the date the 

lease terminated under the law. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Bureau of Land Management, Julie L. 

Weaver, Chief, Fluid Minerals 

Adjudication, at (307) 775–6176. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee 

has agreed to the amended lease terms 

for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 

per acre or fraction thereof per year and 

162⁄3 percent, respectively. The lessee 

has paid the required $500 

administrative fee and $163 to 

reimburse the Department for the cost of 

this Federal Register notice. The lessee 

has met all the requirements for 

reinstatement of the lease as set out in 

Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral 

Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 

188), and the Bureau of Land 

Management is proposing to reinstate 

lease WYW174006 effective April 1, 

2010, under the original terms and 

conditions of the lease and the 

increased rental and royalty rates cited 

above. The BLM has not issued a valid 

lease to any other interest affecting the 

lands. 

Julie L. Weaver, 

Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23465 Filed 9–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[LLID–931–000–L1020–0000–JP–0000252R] 

Notice of Proposed Supplementary 

Rule To Require the Use of Certified 

Noxious-Weed-Free Forage and Straw 

on Bureau of Land Management Lands 

in the State of Idaho 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Proposed supplementary rules. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land 

Management (BLM) in Idaho is 

proposing a supplementary rule that 

would require anyone bringing or 

anyone feeding or storing forage or 

straw on BLM-administered land when 

using BLM public lands in Idaho to use 

certified noxious-weed-free forage and 

straw. Restoration, rehabilitation, and 

stabilization projects also will be 

required to use weed-free straw bales 

and mulch for project work. This action 

is a cooperative effort between the BLM, 

the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), and the 

Idaho State Department of Agriculture 

(ISDA), and supports Idaho State 

noxious weed laws. 

DATES: Comments on the proposed 

supplementary rules must be received 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES