Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 186 / Monday, September 27, 2010 / Notices 59291 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vu 

Q. Bui, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, telephone (202) 205–2582. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2010). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

September 21, 2010, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain liquid crystal 

display devices and products 

interoperable with the same that 

infringe one or more of claims 1, 5, 12, 

17, 18, 20, 21, and 26 of the ‘092 patent; 

claims 1–4, 8, 11–14, and 19 of the ‘019 

patent; and claims 1, 5–7, 9, 10, 16, 19– 

21, 23, and 25 of the ‘241 patent, and 

whether an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainants are: 

Chimei Innolux Corporation, No. 160 

Kesyue Rd., Jhunan Science Park, 

Miaoli County 350, Taiwan; 

Chi Mei Optoelectronics U.S.A., Inc., 

101 Metro Dr., STE 510, San Jose, CA 

95110; 

Innolux Corporation, 2525 Brockton 

Drive, Austin, TX 78758. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Sony Corporation, 1–7–1, Konan, 

Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan; 

Sony Corporation of America, 550 

Madison Ave., New York, NY 10022; 

Sony Electronics Corporation, 16530 Via 

Esprillo, San Diego, CA 92127; 

Sony Computer Entertainment America, 

LLC, 919 East Hillsdale Blvd., Foster 

City, CA 94404. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Vu Q. Bui, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), 

such responses will be considered by 

the Commission if received not later 

than 20 days after the date of service by 

the Commission of the complaint and 

the notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 21, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24062 Filed 9–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–736] 

In the Matter of: Certain Wind and 

Solar-Powered Light Posts and Street 

Lamps; Notice of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of investigation 

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

August 6, 2010, under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Duggal 

Dimensions LLC of New York, New 

York; Duggal Energy Solutions, LLC of 

New York, New York; and Duggal 

Visual Solutions, Inc. of New York, New 

York. The complaint alleges violations 

of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain wind and solar-powered light 

posts and street lamps by reason of 

infringement of the claimed design of 

U.S. Patent No. D610,732 (‘‘the ‘732 

patent’’). The complaint further alleges 

that an industry in the United States 

exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of 

section 337. 

The complainants request that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue an 

exclusion order and cease and desist 

orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

202–205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher G. Paulraj, Esq., Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–3052. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2010). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

September 21, 2010, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain wind and solarVerDate Mar<15>2010 17:01 Sep 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM 27SEN1

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
59292 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 186 / Monday, September 27, 2010 / Notices 

powered light posts and street lamps 

that infringe the claimed design of the 

‘732 patent, and whether an industry in 

the United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainants are: 

Duggal Dimensions LLC, 10 West 24th 

Street, New York, NY 10010. 

Duggal Energy Solutions, LLC, 9 West 

20th Street, New York, NY 10011. 

Duggal Visual Solutions, Inc., 10 West 

24th Street, New York, NY 10010. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Gus Power Incorporated, 770 Gana 

Court, Mississauga, Ontario, L5S 1P1 

Canada. 

Efston Science Inc., 3350 Dufferin 

Street, Toronto, Ontario, M6A 3A4 

Canada. 

King Luminaire, Inc., 1153 State Route 

46 North, P.O. Box 266, Jefferson, OH 

44047. 

The StressCrete Group, 840 Walkers 

Lane, Burlington, Ontario, L7R 3X9. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Christopher G. Paulraj, Esq., Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 

20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), 

such responses will be considered by 

the Commission if received not later 

than 20 days after the date of service by 

the Commission of the complaint and 

the notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

Issued: September 21, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24064 Filed 9–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

JOINT BOARD FOR THE 

ENROLLMENT OF ACTUARIES 

Meeting of the Advisory Committee; 

Meeting 

AGENCY: Joint Board for the Enrollment 

of Actuaries. 

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory 

Committee meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Executive Director of the 

Joint Board for the Enrollment of 

Actuaries gives notice of a closed 

meeting of the Advisory Committee on 

Actuarial Examinations. 

DATES: The meeting will be held on 

October 22, 2010, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 

p.m. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

Internal Revenue Service, 230 S. 

Dearborn Street, Room 1720, Chicago, 

IL. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patrick W. McDonough, Executive 

Director of the Joint Board for the 

Enrollment of Actuaries, 202–622–8225. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given that the Advisory 

Committee on Actuarial Examinations 

will meet at Internal Revenue Service, 

230 S. Dearborn Street, Room 1720, 

Chicago, IL on Friday, October 22, 2010, 

from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

The purpose of the meeting is to 

discuss questions that may be 

recommended for inclusion on future 

Joint Board examinations in actuarial 

mathematics, pension law and 

methodology referred to in 29 U.S.C. 

1242(a)(1)(B). 

A determination has been made as 

required by section 10(d) of the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., 

that the subject of the meeting falls 

within the exception to the open 

meeting requirement set forth in Title 5 

U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and that the public 

interest requires that such meeting be 

closed to public participation. 

Dated: September 8, 2010. 

Patrick W. McDonough, 

Executive Director, Joint Board for the 

Enrollment of Actuaries. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24152 Filed 9–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Proposed Consent Decree 

Under the Resource Conseation and 

Recovery Act 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

September 20, 2010, a proposed Consent 

Decree in United States v. High Plains 

Resources, Inc., Civil Action No. 2:09– 

CV–00087–ABJ, was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

District of Wyoming. 

The proposed Consent Decree will 

settle the United States’ claims on 

behalf of the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’) pursuant to 

Section 7003 of the Solid Waste 

Disposal Act, as amended by the 

Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Act of 1976 (‘‘RCRA’’), 42 U.S.C. 6973, 

for civil penalties and permanent 

injunctive relief for failure to comply 

with the Administrative Order, Docket 

No. RCRA–08–226–004, issued by EPA 

to Defendant on September 21, 2006 

(the ‘‘2006 AO’’), and abate an imminent 

and substantial endangerment, 

particularly to wildlife, associated with 

a commercial oilfield waste disposal 

facility known as the Parkman Reservoir 

Disposal Facility (the ‘‘Facility’’) located 

in Johnson County, Wyoming. The 

Consent Decree resolves all claims in 

the Complaint, in return for which 

Defendant will (a) Implement an 

operation and maintenance (‘‘O&M’’) 

plan to prevent endangering migratory 

birds and wildlife while the Facility 

remains open; (b) establish a trust fund 

in the amount of $206,000 to cover the 

cost of the eventual closure of the 

Facility; and (c) pay a civil penalty in 

the amount of $40,000. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

comments relating to the proposed 

Consent Decree for a period of 30 days 

from the date of this publication. 

Comments on the Consent Decree 

should be addressed to the Assistant 

Attorney General, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, and either 

e-mailed to pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O. 

Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611, and 

should refer to United States v. High 

Plains Resources Inc., Civil Action No. 

2:09–CV–00087–ABJ, D.J. Ref. No. 90– 

7–1–09271. Commenters may request an 

opportunity for a public meeting in the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES