alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Department of the United States Air Force LogoBiography
                  United States Air Force060609-F-JZ507-091.JPG
            Major General MILTON B. ADAMSMajor General Milton B. Adams is chief of staff, Headquarters Pacific Air Forces, Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii.
General Adams was born at Eagle Pass, Texas, in 1917. He completed high school in Corpus Christi, Texas, in 1934 and entered the U.S. Military Academy the following year. He graduated in 1939, and was assigned to Kelly Field, Texas, where he received his pilot wings in 1940.
He served with the 22nd Pursuit Squadron at Langley Field, Va., Puerto Rico and Trinidad from 1940 to 1943. After a short tour as commander of the 328th Fighter Group at Hamilton Field, Calif., he went to the Southwest Pacific in October 1943 where he commanded the 18th Fighter Group until July 1945 when he returned to the United States after flying 275 combat missions.
Eighteen months later he was assigned to Tehran, Iran, as advisor to the Imperial Iranian Air Force, where he served until early 1949. In 1950 General Adams graduated from the Air War College. After a brief tour with the Air Tactical School, he served successively as faculty member of the Air War College; director of the Squadron Officer Course and director of the Field Officer Course of the Air University. In 1954 he went to the National War College and graduated in 1955.
He then commanded the Basic Jet Flying School at Laredo Air Force Base, Texas, for two years, and the Advanced School for Tactical Fighter Pilots at Williams Air Force Base, Ariz., for two years. General Adams was assigned to Headquarters U.S. Air Force in September 1959, as deputy assistant chief of staff for guided missiles. He subsequently served as director of the Joint Secretariat for the Secretary of the Air Force's Designated Systems Management Group and the Air Staff Weapons Board and later as the director of systems acquisition, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, Systems and Logistics.
In November 1962, General Adams was assigned to the Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, as assistant chief of staff for plans. Upon his return to the United States in September 1965, he was assigned to Shaw Air Force Base, S.C., as commander of the Tactical Reconnaissance Center.
His next assignment was as deputy director for forces, Defense Communications Planning Group, Washington, D.C. He held that position from September 1966 until December 1967 when he was designated commander, Headquarters Command, U.S. Air Force.
General Adams became chief of staff, Headquarters Pacific Air Forces in July 1968.
(Current as of Sept. 15, 1968)Department of the Air Force Logo
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1112 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1112

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide individuals 
                relief from the alternative minimum tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2007

 Mr. Reynolds (for himself, Mr. Herger, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
   English of Pennsylvania, Mr. Weller of Illinois, Mr. Cantor, Mr. 
 Linder, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Walsh of New York, Mr. 
McHugh, Mr. Fossella, Mr. Kuhl of New York, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. Royce, Mr. 
Hunter, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Culberson, Mrs. Blackburn, 
 Mr. Terry, Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Walden of Oregon, 
  Mrs. Capito, Mrs. Drake, Mrs. Bono, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. 
Frelinghuysen, Mr. Neugebauer, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, Mr. Walberg, 
    Mrs. Biggert, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, and Mr. Bilirakis) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide individuals 
                relief from the alternative minimum tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stealth Tax Relief Extension Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX EXEMPTION AMOUNT FOR 2007.

    (a) In General.--Section 55(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to exemption amount for taxpayers other than 
corporations) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$62,550 in the case of taxable years 
        beginning in 2006'' in subparagraph (A) and inserting ``$66,400 
        in the case of taxable years beginning in 2007'', and
            (2) by striking ``$42,500 in the case of taxable years 
        beginning in 2006'' in subparagraph (B) and inserting ``$45,100 
        in the case of taxable years beginning in 2007''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006.

SEC. 3. ALLOWANCE OF NONREFUNDABLE PERSONAL CREDITS AGAINST REGULAR AND 
              ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX LIABILITY.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 26(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``2006'' in the heading thereof and 
        inserting ``2007'', and
            (2) by striking ``or 2006'' and inserting ``2006, or 
        2007''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Erik TRACZYK.

No. 2011-KK-2149.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 2, 2011.

In re Traczyk, Erik; — Defendant; Applying for Rehearing of this Court’s action dated October 19, 2011; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 473-300; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1352.

Rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE
THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,064
<SECURITIES>                                    19,320
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,188
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,278
<PP&E>                                           6,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,651
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,971
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           157
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,265
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,651
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,758
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,348
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,623
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,849
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,774
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,774
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit          32.2**

**CERTIFICATION          PURSUANT TO**

**18          U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                    and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of                    the Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                       |                                         |                                                                               |
|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                    |                                                                          |
| Dated:                      March 20, 2006 | By:                                | /s/ HARRY                      J.                      WHITE, JR.   |
|                                       | Harry                          J. White, Jr. |
|                                       |                                         |

----
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP, independent certified public accountants

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


The Board of Directors and the
Stockholders of All Communications Corporation

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement No.  333-77661 of All  Communications  Corporation on Form S-8, of our
report dated February 29, 2000 relating to the consolidated financial statements
All Communications  Corporation appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999.


BDO Seidman, LLP
Woodbridge, New Jersey
March 29, 2000
#### F. T. Sims v. Howell Bros. et al.

(No. 3550.)

Appeal from Navarro County.

J. E. Stout, counsel for appellant.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

Will-son, J.

§ 180. *Verified account when not due is not evidence; affidavit must correspond voith the account; case stated.*Appellee sued appellant upon two accounts aggregating-*268$247.90, both of which accounts were verified by affidavit, and neither of which were due at the time of the institution of the suit, but an attachment was sued out at the time of the institution of said suit. Appellee recovered judgment for the full amount sued for, and for costs. On the trial the accounts sued upon were introduced in evidence by appellee over the objection of the appellant, and no other evidence was adduced by either party. At the time the accounts were verified, they were not due, and could not be verified by affidavits, so as to make them admissible in evidence under article 2266 of the Revised Statutes. [1 App. C. C., § 379.]

December 6, 1890.

Both of the accounts appear to have been originally made out against R. B. Sims, and the name of the appellant afterwards written over that of R. B. Sims, and the affidavit verifying one of said accounts states that the same is an account against R. B. Sims. No evidence was adduced or offered by appellee explaining the alterations in the accounts, and the variance between the affidavit and account. We are of the opinion that the court erred in admitting said accounts in evidence.

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1425 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 304
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1425

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2007

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             August 1, 2007

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 4551 East 52nd Street in Odessa, Texas, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
               Marvin `Rex' Young Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT MARVIN ``REX'' YOUNG POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4551 East 52nd Street in Odessa, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Marvin `Rex' Young Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Marvin `Rex' Young Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 304

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1425

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 4551 East 52nd Street in Odessa, Texas, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
               Marvin `Rex' Young Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 1, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S7137]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               RECOGNITION OF THE ACTING MAJORITY LEADER

  The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The acting majority leader is recognized.

                                SCHEDULE

  Mr. THOMAS. Mr. President, this morning the time for the two leaders 
has been reserved and the Senate will immediately resume consideration 
of Senate Concurrent Resolution 13, the concurrent budget resolution.
  Rollcall votes are expected throughout the day on or in relation to 
amendments to the budget. The Senate will not recess during the 
afternoon today for policy luncheons, but will continue in session 
debating the budget.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 11

              Statement Regarding Computation of Earnings Per Share


                                                                Three Months
                                                                Ended 9/30/95
                                                                -------------
                                                            
Net Earnings                                                  ($       127,299)
                                                              ================

Primary earnings per share:
     Weighted average shares outstanding                               447,937
     Less unearned employee stock ownership plan shares                (24,871)

     Average option shares granted                                      37,021

     Less assumed purchase of shares using treasury method             (28,473)
                                                              ----------------

Common and common equivalent shares outstanding                        431,614
                                                              ================

Earnings per common share - primary                           ($          0.29)
                                                              ================

Fully - diluted earnings per share:
     Weighted average shares outstanding                               447,937
     Less unearned employee stock ownership plan shares                (24,871)

     Average option shares granted                                      37,021

     Less assumed purchase of shares using treasury method             (27,360)
                                                              ----------------

Common and common equivalent shares outstanding                        432,727
                                                              ================

Earnings per common share - fully diluted                     ($          0.29)
                                                              ================


                                      -13-
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended November 2, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert N. Wildrick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.





December 16, 2002/s/     Robert N. WildrickRobert N. Wildrick Chief Executive Officer
537 A.2d 111

#### Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, Appellant *v.*Harold Montgomery, Appellee.

*422Argued December 18, 1987,

before Judges Doyle, Palladino, and Senior Judge Kalish, sitting as a panel of three.

*Harold H. Cramer,*Assistant Counsel, with him, *Spencer A. Manthorpe,*Chief Counsel, for appellant.

*Steven M. Janove,*with him, *Ronald F. Kidd, Duane, Morris*& *Heckscher,*for appellee.

February 12, 1988:

Opinion by

Senior Judge Kalish,

The Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (DOT), appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County which sustained the appeal of Harold Montgomery (appellee) from the suspension of his operating privileges. We reverse the order of the court of common pleas and reinstate the suspension of appellees operating privileges.

On October 28, 1984, police officer Joseph Conover of the Abington Township Police Department responded to a call concerning a possible drunken driver. Officer Conover, along with police officer George McReynolds, intercepted the suspect vehicle, operated by appellee, and stopped it. The officers gave appellee some *423field sobriety tests which he foiled to perform to their satisfaction. The officers then took appellee into custody and transported him to the Abington Police Station.

Appellee agreed to submit to a breath best, but upon discovering that the Intoximeter machine was not working properly, he was told that he would be taken to a hospital for a blood test. Appellee refused to take a blood test because he said that he bleeds profusely and has a fear of needles. Officer Conover advised appellee that a refusal would result in an automatic one-year suspension of his drivers license pursuant to Section 1547 of the Vehicle Code, *as amended,*75 Pa. C. S. §1547. However, appellee still refused to take a blood test.

In *Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Bartle,*93 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 132, 500 A.2d 525 (1985), a case factually similar, we said, “There is nothing in [the act] to indicate that the driver has the option of choosing the test, although he does have the right to have his own physician administer a blood test.” *Id.*at 134, 500 A.2d at 526.

Accordingly, we reverse the order of the court of common pleas and reinstate the suspension of appellees operating privileges.

Order

Now, February 12, 1988, the order of the Court of Common. Pleas of Montgomery County, in No. 84-19279, dated March 18, 1986, is reversed, and the suspension of the operating privileges of Harold Montgomery is reinstated.
#### Dayne HOOKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D11-1048.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 8, 2011.

Karlene L. Gray, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

*865Before WELLS, SHEPHERD, and EMAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Hernandez v. State,*61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); *Manzano v. State,*27 So.3d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                         975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CURRENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR ACCOMPANYING
NOTES THERETO.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>