alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 74-958.

No. 75-1558.

#### United States et al. *v.*Janis, National Hockey League et al. *v.*Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc., et al.,

428 U. S. 433; and

427 U. S. 639. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
#### Christopher Thomas HAYS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D10-1406.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 17, 2011.

*888James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

PALMER, J.

Christopher Thomas Hays (defendant) appeals his judgment and sentence entered by the trial court on the charge of failing to comply with sex offender reporting requirements.1 Determining that the trial court did not err in entering the judgment, we affirm same. However, determining that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to renew the offer of assistance of counsel to the defendant at the sentencing stage, we vacate the defendant’s sentence and remand for resentencing.

In this case, the defendant represented himself during his trial. Following the entry of the jury’s verdict, the trial court entered judgment and proceeded immediately to sentencing without renewing an offer of assistance of counsel to the defendant.

This court has held:

> [I]f a defendant waives the right to counsel at any stage of the criminal proceedings, the trial court must renew the offer of assistance of counsel at each subsequent stage of the proceedings. Sentencing is a critical stage in criminal proceedings; and, even if a defendant does not request appointment of counsel, this omission is not considered a knowing waiver of the right to counsel.

*Hardy v. State,*655 So.2d 1245, 1247-48 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (vacating and remanding the defendant’s sentence for re-sentencing because the trial court failed to renew its offer of assistance of counsel at sentencing); *see also*Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.111(d)(5) (stating: “[I]f a waiver is accepted at any stage of the proceedings, the offer of assistance of counsel shall be renewed by the court at each subsequent stage of the proceedings at which the defendant appears without counsel.”).

Accordingly, the defendant’s sentence is vacated and this matter is remanded for resentencing.

Judgment AFFIRMED, Sentence VACATED; and case REMANDED for RE-SENTENCING.

ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ„ concur.

1

. *See*§ 943.0435, Fla. Stat. (2008).
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60647 Summary Calendar

LARRY STEPHEN PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus MARK MILLER, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:95-CV-126

- - - - - - - - - - March 12, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Larry Stephen Perry appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. The district court dismissed his action for failure to prosecute under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and ordered that Perry pay monetary sanctions for Perry's failure to comply with local rules. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute or in imposing monetary sanctions for Perry's failure to comply with local rules. McCullough v. Lynaugh , 835 F.2d 1126, 1127 (5th Cir.No. 95-60647 -2- 1988); see United States v. Wilkes , 20 F.3d 651, 653 (5th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED.
#### STATE ex rel. Christopher JOHNSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-2502.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Johnson, Christopher; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedi*915al Writs, Parish of Lafourche, 17th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 453603; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010-KW-1262.

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                           4,632
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                       141
<INVENTORY>                                     15,048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,390
<PP&E>                                         127,195
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,936
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 212,187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,749
<BONDS>                                        122,261
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   212,187
<SALES>                                        293,020
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               293,020
<CGS>                                          240,930
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  240,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,009
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,088
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,921
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,063
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Willie J. ZENO, Sr. v. Charles J. FORET.

No. 2010-C-2482.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 25, 2011.

In re Zeno Sr., Willie J.; —Plaintiff; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s action dated January 14, 2011; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 2009-5791; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-330.

Rehearing not considered. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule IX, Section 6.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 14

- 12 406 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:14

- cv - 0009 9

- RWS , Bkcy No. 13

- bkc

- 23099

- REB In Re: BARTEL JAMES VANDER IEST, JR.,

Debtor.

__________________________________________________ BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus BARTEL JAMES VANDER IEST, JR., Debtor

- Appellee.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________ (August 18, 2015) ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Case: 14-12406 Date Filed: 08/18/2015 Page: 1 of 22 Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Appellee, Bartel James Vander Iest, Jr., is a Chapter 7 debtor. H e ha s two mortgages on his h ouse secured by corresponding liens. The second lien, Bank of America’s, is completely “underwater.” Vander Iest obtained from the bankruptcy court an order “stripping off” Bank of America’s second lien as void under 11 U.S.C. § 506(d). The district cou rt affirmed. Bank of America appealed. Bound by our prior precedent rule, we affirmed. The Supreme Court granted Bank of America’s petition for writ of certiorari, vacated this court’s judgment, and remanded the case for further proceedings in light of Bank of America, N.A. v. Caulkett , 575 U.S. ___, 135 S. Ct. 1995 (2015). Under Caulkett , § 506(d) does not permit the bankruptcy court to strip off the underwater second lien. Following the issuance of Caulkett , Bank of America filed a motion for
summary reversal in this court. We deny that motion by separate order. We vacate the judgment of the district court and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion and Caulkett

. VACATED AND REMANDED. Case: 14-12406 Date Filed: 08/18/2015 Page: 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   *
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Cronos Group (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), the undersigned, Dennis J. Tietz, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Frank
P. Vaughan, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, based on their knowledge, that:  (i)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  May 13, 2005/s/ DENNIS J. TIETZ
Dennis J. Tietz, Chief Executive Officer/s/ FRANK P. VAUGHAN
Frank P. Vaughan, Chief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.   *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as required by Section 906, is
not deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to the
rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said
Act. E3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of First Industrial, L.P. for the year ended December 31,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001033128
<NAME> FIRST INDUSTRIAL, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,995
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,944
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,939
<PP&E>                                       1,201,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (22,319)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,870,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,009
<BONDS>                                        839,592
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     966,177
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,870,183
<SALES>                                         98,566
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,566
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (29,183)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (22,062)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (25,099)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,285
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             53,619
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,619
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Reserve Recruiters reach goal for 16th straight yearPublished Oct. 3, 2016
                        
                        By  Master Sgt. Chance Babin
                        
                        
                        Air Force Reserve Recruiting Service
                **ROBINS AIR FORCE BASE, Ga. (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Reserve Command Recruiting Service has met the command’s accession goal for the 16th consecutive year.
Lt. Gen. Maryanne Miller, the AFRC commander, sent a congratulatory message to recruiters praising them for meeting their fiscal year 2016 goal.
“You and your team are amazing,” Miller said. “The leadership, collaboration, willpower and dedication by our recruiters, all wings, (Numbered Air Forces) and the command enabled these efforts to make us the incredible force that we are for this nation.”
For fiscal 2016, Reserve recruiters not only reached their goal but surpassed it, ending the year with 8,562 accessions equating to 100.7 percent of the goal.
“In a year where we faced many obstacles and challenges, our recruiters really stood up to the challenge and have once again proven they are absolutely the best in the Department of Defense,” said Col. Christopher Nick, the AFRC Recruiting Service commander. “We were tasked to grow end strength by 2,100 personnel and we not only met it, but we exceeded it. That was the biggest challenge.”
One of the other challenges Recruiting Service faced was reaching the goal of 8,500 with a relatively inexperienced recruiting force. Sixty percent of the line recruiters have less than two years’ experience, 30 percent of the in-service recruiters have less than a year, and 42 percent of the flight chiefs have less than a year, according to officials.recruiting 



AFRC
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**EXCHANGE
      ACT RULE 15D-14(B) AND**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation
      (the ”Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Haddon B. Libby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b)
      and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
      Oxley Act of 2002, that:





i.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





ii.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation and will
      be
      retained by U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








By:
            /S/
                HADDON LIBBYName:
            Haddon
                B. LibbyTitle:
            Chief
                Financial OfficerDate:
            May
                15, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          33,557
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  402,616
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               436,173
<PP&E>                                         701,383
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,828
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,928,438
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          234,771
<BONDS>                                     10,176,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        6,000,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,720,982
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,496,742
<SALES>                                         77,484
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,817,998
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  659,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                76,181
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,082,226
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,082,226
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,082,226
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.228
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.222
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Marcus A. AUGILLARD v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-0408.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re Augillard, Marcus A.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of East Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 10-CR-664; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 2089.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; *State v. Parker,*98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.
#### Charles Edward BURNS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D10-781.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 17, 2011.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton and Stephanie H. Park, Assistant Public Defenders, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER. CURIAM.

Charles Edward Burns appeals from his conviction and sentence on a charge of burglary of an occupied dwelling. He argues that the trial court erred by proceeding to trial without conducting a hearing to determine his mental competence after entering an order invoking the competency proceedings set forth in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.210. *See Vestal v. State,*50 So.3d 733, 735 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (having concluded that a “mental examination of [defendant] was necessary to determine if she was competent to proceed ...” the trial court was required to follow the prescribed procedure and hold a competency hearing) (citations omitted). We agree, reverse the conviction and sentence, and remand for a new trial contingent upon a determination that Burns is competent to proceed. *Id.; see also, Maxwell v. State,*974 So.2d 505 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); *Cochran v. State,*925 So.2d 370 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); *Carrion v. State,*859 So.2d 563, 565 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

PALMER, LAWSON, and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #12258 and #12259]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 4.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Iowa (FEMA-1930-DR), dated 07/29/2010.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes.                    

*Incident Period:*                         06/01/2010 through 08/31/2010.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         08/31/2010.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         09/27/2010.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         04/29/2011.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

      ( print page 57997)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Iowa, dated 07/29/2010, is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 06/01/2010 and continuing through 08/31/2010.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008).

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-23799 Filed 9-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P