alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. H. Aiken et al. v. Waco State Bank.

(No. 7027.)

Appeal from McLennan County.

A. M. Monteith, counsel for appellant.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 254. *Usury; plea setting up, held insufficient; case stated.*Huling P. Bobertson loaned one Bussell $500, taking his note with appellants as sureties. This note was due November 6, 1885, and bore twelve per cent, interest on its face. Bussell sold to appellants his homestead, they agreeing to assume the debt due to Bobertson. On January 6, 1887, appellants executed their note to Bobertson for $616.66, bearing twelve per cent, upon its face, and maturing one year after date. When this note fell due, appellants desired an extension of time, and on January 6, 1888, made another note to Bobertson for $630 due in one year, and upon, its face bearing interest at the rate of twelve per cent. At the same time they executed to Bobertson a note for $110, with the same rate of interest expressed on its face. The appellee bank sued appellants and an indorser upon the note for $630. Appellants pleaded usury, and alleged that by verbal agreement with Bobertson all the notes should, in addition to the twelve per cent, expressed, bear eight per cent., making the agreed interest twenty per cent. The bank obtained the note after maturity without knowledge of the usury agreement. The court below sustained exceptions to the plea of usury.

*442May 20, 1891.

If any of the eight per cent, went into or constituted a part of the note sued upon, then there was error in sustaining the exceptions to the plea. If all of the eight per cent, went into the $110 note, then there was no error. The plea must certainly show that the $630 note — the one sued on — contained a part of the usurious interest arising from the eight per cent, agreed upon in addition to the lawful interest expressed in the contracts. Does it do this? We think not. By calculating the interest on the $500 at twelve per cent, through the various renewals of the note, we find that at that rate the amount of the note sued on is not greater than it should be. The plea gives the dates of the different notes. No doubt usury entered into the note of $616.66, but when the note sued on was executed the usury was eliminated, and it was left untainted with illegality. When the other one for $110 is sought to be collected usury can be pleaded, and by showing the whole transaction the plea may be easily sustained. There was no error in sustaining the exceptions to the plea. The general denial was not stricken out. The plea of privilege was properly overruled, appellants having agreed to continue before presenting the plea, and thus waiving it.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                                                                          |                                 |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                          |                                                                     |                            |
| Dated:              March 15, 2007 |                                                                               | /s/              HARRY J. WHITE, JR. |
|                               | Harry                  J. White, Jr. Chief                  Financial Officer |

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Docucorp International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Robert Gary, Senior VicePresident Finance and Administration of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(3)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ J. Robert Gary                   |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                 |
| J. Robert Gary                       |
| *Senior Vice President, Finance and* |
| *Administration*                     |
| *(Principal Financial Officer)*      |
| October 11, 2006                |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Trade Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members to the FTC Performance Review Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Leydon, Chief Human Capital Officer, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3633.

      ( print page 60126)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Publication of the Performance Review Board (PRB) membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB reviews and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor, and makes recommendations regarding performance ratings, performance awards, and pay-for-performance pay adjustments to the Chairman.

The following individuals have been designated to serve on the Commission's Performance Review Board:

Charles H. Schneider, Executive Director, Chairman

Willard K. Tom, General Counsel

Pauline M. Ippolito, Deputy Director, Bureau of Economics

Richard A. Feinstein, Director, Bureau of Competition

Jessica L. Rich, Deputy Director, Bureau of Consumer Protection

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

 Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-24327 Filed 9-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Rule 13a-14 Certification**
I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Cronos Group (the “Registrant”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and
(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the AuditCommittee of Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 13, 2005
/s/ DENNIS J. TIETZ
No. 87-6411.

#### Beam *v.*Foltz, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.1I, Donald L. Grill, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fentura Financial, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting   Dated: August 11, 2006 /s/ Donald L. Grill     Donald L. Grill  Chief Executive Officer
#### Jesse L. MORMON v. James CALDWELL, et al.

No. 2011-CI-0162.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

*1165In re Mormon, Jesse L.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 586,913; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 0968.

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 12, 2010 | By:                                                                                                                                                                                          | /s/ Glenn D. Estrella |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                   | Glenn D. Estrella                                                                                                                                                                            |
|                                   | Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1446 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1446

To amend the Small Business Act to allow an increased deferment period 
                 for loans under the 7(b) loan program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2007

  Mr. Jindal introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Small Business Act to allow an increased deferment period 
                 for loans under the 7(b) loan program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED DEFERMENT PERIOD.

    Section 7 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636) is amended by 
inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Increased Deferment Authorized.--
            ``(1) In general.--In making loans under section 7(b), the 
        Administrator may provide, to the person receiving the loan, an 
        option to defer repayment on the loan.
            ``(2) Period.--A deferment under paragraph (1) may not 
        exceed 4 years.
            ``(3) Retroactive application to hurricane katrina and 
        hurricane rita victims.--This subsection applies retroactively 
        to any loan under section 7(b) that was made--
                    ``(A) in response to Hurricane Katrina or Hurricane 
                Rita of 2005; and
                    ``(B) for a small business located in a county or 
                parish designated by the Administrator as a disaster 
                area by reason of such Hurricane Katrina or Hurricane 
                Rita, as applicable.''.
                                 <all>
```
News United States Air Force
 Green Dot to roll out across the Air ForcePublished Dec. 30, 2015
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Airmen will take the first step of a five-year strategy to decrease interpersonal violence across the service in January when 1,500 Airman implementers attend one of 22 Green Dot prep sessions worldwide.The Air Force contracted the non-profit Green Dot organization to provide these violence prevention tools to the total Air Force over the next three years.“As a service, our number one priority has and will continue to be response. However, in order to stop violence before it occurs we must dedicate time to prevention,” said Chief Master Sgt. Melanie Noel, the Air Force Sexual Assault Prevention and Response senior enlisted advisor. “Helping our Airmen understand what they can do to prevent violence and how they can do it is the first step.”Green Dot prepares organizations to implement a strategy of violence prevention that reduces power-based interpersonal violence, which includes not only sexual violence, but also domestic violence, dating violence, stalking, child abuse, elder abuse, and bullying.“Green Dot is the Air Force’s first step in arming Airmen for violence prevention using an evidence based public health model,” said Dr. Andra Tharp, the Air Force’s highly qualified prevention expert. “Although that sounds complicated, really what it means is that we know Airmen are a vital part of the solution and we will use methods like this that have been subjected to rigorous scientific testing and were proven to be effective in reducing violence.”Reflective of Green Dot’s wider scope, command-designated Airmen at each installation will conduct 50-minute long sessions across the Air Force. Installation leadership will also have oversight of Green Dot through the Community Action Information Board and Integrated Delivery System, and track completion through the Advanced Distributed Learning System.“It’s on all of us to take responsibility to prevent interpersonal violence in our Air Force,” said Air Force CAIB chair, Brig. Gen. Lenny Richoux. “There are more good Airmen out there who want to take care of their wingman than there are predators seeking to inflict acts of violence inside our family, and I have confidence our Airmen won’t let me or each other stand-alone against this criminal behavior.”The 1,500 Airman implementers will complete training by March 2016. They will return to their units to train peer leader Airmen at each base followed by training for all Airmen.“Taking care of one another requires an integrated approach using the expertise of the medical community, sexual assault prevention and the Profession of Arms Center of Excellence,” Richoux said. “Old-school analog leadership from commanders and supervisors and between Airmen is the key to our success.”Green Dot 



sexual assault 



domestic violence 



SAPR 



prevention
vivakor_ex401.htm


    EXHIBIT
4.1  SPECIMEN COMMON STOCK

    


    


    Incorporated
under the laws of the State of Nevada

    


    
      	
              NUMBER

            	
              SHARES

            
	 
      	 
      


    

    


    VIVAKOR, INC.

    Authorized
242,500,000 shares of Common Stock at par value $0.001

    


    SEE
REVERSE FOR

    CERTAIN
DEFINITIONS

    


    This
Certifies that
_________________________________________________________

    


    


    is the
Owner of
___________________________________________________________

    


    


    Fully
paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock of

    


    VIVAKOR,
INC.

    


    Transferable
on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon
surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.

    This
certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer
Agent.

    


    Witness
the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly
authorized officers.

    


    Dated

    


    


    
      	 
      	
              [SEAL]

            	 
      
	
              President

            	
               

            	      
              Secretary

            


    

    


    COUNTERSIGNED

    INTEGRITY
STOCK TRANSFER

    LAS
VEGAS, NV 89120

    


    


    BY:____________________

    Authorized
Signature