alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 AF releases new ICBM solicitationPublished July 29, 2016
                        
                        
                        Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center Public Affairs
                **KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE, N.M. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force released July 29 a request for proposals for its Ground Based Strategic Deterrent (GBSD) intercontinental ballistic missile weapon system program; up to two contract awards are expected in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017.GBSD is the follow-on to the aging LGM-30 Minuteman III ICBM. The launch systems and weapon system command and control physical infrastructure being used for Minuteman III today first became operational with the Minuteman I ICBM system in the mid-1960s. While certain components and subsystems have been upgraded over the years, including a transition to Minuteman III configuration in the 1970s, most of the fundamental infrastructure in use today is original and has supported more than 50 years of continuous operation. The Minuteman III flight systems in use today were fielded in the late 1990s and early 2000s with an intended 20-year lifespan. The current Minuteman III system will face increased operational and sustainment challenges until it can be replaced. The Air Force is focused on developing and delivering an integrated weapon system, including launch and command and control segments. The new GBSD weapon system will meet existing national requirements, while having the adaptability and flexibility to affordably address changing technology and threat environments through 2075. Deployment is projected to begin in the late 2020s."The Minuteman III will have a difficult time surviving in the active anti-access, area denial environment that we will be dealing with in the 2030 and beyond time period," Gen. Robin Rand, the commander of Air Force Global Strike Command, told the House Armed Services Committee’s Strategic Forces Subcommittee in March."This request for proposals is the next step to ensuring the nation's ICBM leg of the nuclear triad remains safe, secure and effective," said Maj. Gen. Scott Jansson, the commander of the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center and Air Force program executive officer for strategic systems.Adm. Cecil Haney, the commander of U.S. Strategic Command, supports the GBSD to "ensure an adversary cannot launch a comprehensive counterforce attack on the United States by striking only a few targets," he said during his keynote speech at a strategic deterrent panel at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in January.ICBM 



nuclear 



nuclear deterrence 



AFMC 



Kirtland AFB
#### ELLIJAY FEED *&*SUPPLY CO., Inc., Garland Cochran, Guy Paul Cochran, James Earl Holt and Charles E. Kidley, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 17955.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

April 22, 1960.

*792M. Neil Andrews, Atlanta, Ga., A. Cecil Palmour, Bobby Lee Cook, Summerville, Ga., for appellants.

Charles D. Read, Jr., U. S. Atty., John W. Stokes, Jr., and E. Ralph Ivey, Asst. U. S. Attys., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the record in this case in light of the grounds of appeal urged by Appellants. We find them all to be without merit-The evidence amply supported the jury’s-verdict as to each defendant; the trial court did not err in permitting a witness to state what was in a bill of lading-shown to be in the possession of one of the defendants on trial; and the court, did not err in refusing to grant a mistrial on any of the grounds asserted.

The judgment is affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 4, 2014

Order 

November 4, 2014

149567(65)

CHABAD-LUBAVITCH OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

DR. DOV SCHUCHMAN, KEN KOHN, DORENE 

SOBCZAK, NEIL CRAFT, ANDREA

FEUEREISEN, DALE GOODMAN, LEAH RUBY, 

ELIMELECH SILBERBERG, SARA TUGMAN 

BAIS CHABAD TORAH, and CONREGATION 

BAIS CHABAD OF WEST BLOOMFIELD,

Defendants-Appellants.

SC: 149567

COA: 312037

Oakland CC: 2012-126333-CH

__________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for the temporary admission of L. Martin 

Nussbaum to practice pro hac vice under MCR 8.126(A) is GRANTED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                        EXHIBIT 12.1



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Year Ended December 31,
                                                               -----------------------
                                                       1994     1995     1996     1997     1998
                                                      ------   ------   ------   ------   ------
<S>                                                    <C>      <C>      <C>     <C>      <C>   
Earnings:
    Income from continuing operations
        before provision for income taxes              4,032    3,058    8,409   18,984   29,810
    Interest expense                                   1,642    3,609    4,759    4,664    7,150
    Interest component of rent expense                    44       87      119      227      367
    Amortization of previously capitalized interest       --       --      497      520    1,008
                                                      ------   ------   ------   ------   ------
Earnings                                               5,718    6,754   13,784   24,395   38,335
                                                      ======   ======   ======   ======   ======

Fixed Charges:
    Interest expense                                   1,642    3,609    4,759    4,664    7,150
    Interest capitalized                                  --      516      711      823    2,662
    Interest component of rent expense                    44       87      119      227      367
                                                      ------   ------   ------   ------   ------
Fixed Charges                                          1,686    4,212    5,589    5,714   10,179
                                                      ======   ======   ======   ======   ======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                       3.4      1.6      2.5      4.3      3.8
</TABLE>
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 29, 1999

                              CONTACT: Douglas J. Iverson, Vice Chairman & CEO
                                       (616) 393-7002
                                       Jon W. Swets, Sr. VP & CFO
                                       (616) 224-2841




                         OTTAWA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                      ANNOUNCES STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM

HOLLAND,  MICHIGAN,  September 29, 1999 -- Ottawa Financial Corporation (Nasdaq:
"OFCP") announced today it is beginning a new repurchase  program and intends to
repurchase up to 5% of its outstanding shares. The shares will be purchased from
time to time depending upon market conditions.  The Corporation announced it has
completed its prior repurchase program announced September 23, 1998.

Douglas J. Iverson,  Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,  indicated that
the Board of Directors  approved the  repurchase  program in view of the current
price level of the Corporation's common stock and the strong capital position of
the  Corporation's  subsidiary,  AmeriBank.  Mr. Iverson stated that "we believe
that  the  repurchase  of  our  shares   represents  an  attractive   investment
opportunity  which  will  benefit  the  Corporation  and our  stockholders.  The
repurchased  shares  will  become  treasury  shares and will be used for general
corporate purposes."

At June 30, 1999, the Corporation had $928.9 million in assets, $78.0 million in
stockholders' equity, and 6,263,019 shares outstanding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WINSTON HOTELS, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,004
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,487
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,591
<PP&E>                                         446,188
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,157
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 413,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,368
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         30
<COMMON>                                           164
<OTHER-SE>                                     208,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   413,952
<SALES>                                         48,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,545
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   239
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,344
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,212
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,212
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,035
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20420 Summary Calendar

JOANNE ROSE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-96-CV-2108

December 26, 1997 Before GARWOOD, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. *

PER CURIAM:

Joanne Rose appeals from a judgment affirming the decision of

the Commissioner of Social Security partially denying her claim for

disability insurance benefits. She contends that the Commissioner

failed to apply the correct legal standards and that his decision

concerning the onset of her disability was not supported by2

substantial evidence. We have reviewed the record and the briefs

of the parties, and we AFFIRM for essentially the reasons set forth

by the magistrate judge and adopted by the district court. S ee

Rose v. Chater , No. H-96-2108 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 1997).
Exhibit 31.01



Certifications



I, J.A. Cardwell, Sr., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Petro Stopping Centers, L.P.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Date: November 11, 2005             
|                                    
|/s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.              
|(J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)                
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Tamer Husseini, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Celeritek, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Celeritek, Inc.

            By:    /s/  TAMER HUSSEINI
            ----------------------------------------
            Name:  Tamer Husseini
            Title: Chief Executive Officer

      I, Margaret E. Smith, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Celeritek, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Celeritek, Inc.

            By:   /s/  MARGARET E. SMITH
            ----------------------------------------
            Name: Margaret E. Smith
            Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.2

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Franklin Street
Properties Corp. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Barbara J. Corinha, Vice President, Chief Operating Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Franklin
Street Properties Corp. and will be retained by Franklin Street Properties Corp.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


Date: March 26, 2003                 /s/ Barbara J. Corinha
                                     ----------------------
                                     Barbara J. Corinha
                                     Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
                                     (equivalent of Chief Financial Officer),
                                     Treasurer and Secretary
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                      PROJECT SOFTWARE & DEVELOPMENT, INC.

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                           Three months         Three months         Nine months          Nine months
                                              ended                ended               ended                 ended
PRIMARY:                                     06/30/97             06/30/96            06/30/97              06/30/96
                                           ------------         ------------         -----------          -----------
<S>                                        <C>                   <C>                  <C>                 <C>
Weighted average common shares               9,826,396            9,608,676            9,767,357            9,583,645
outstanding ..................
Common stock equivalents .....                 145,335              446,779              310,447              457,539
                                            ----------          -----------          -----------          -----------
                                             9,971,731           10,055,455           10,077,804           10,041,184
                                            ----------          -----------          -----------          -----------

Net income ...................              $2,490,478          $ 2,749,896          $ 7,555,034          $ 6,324,634

Net income per share .........              $     0.25          $      0.27          $      0.75          $      0.63



FULLY DILUTED:

Weighted average common shares               9,826,396            9,608,676            9,767,357            9,583,645
outstanding ..................
Common stock equivalents .....                 145,886              476,853              322,716              488,986
                                            ----------          -----------          -----------          -----------
                                             9,972,282           10,085,529           10,090,073           10,072,631
                                            ----------          -----------          -----------          -----------

Net income ...................              $2,490,478          $ 2,749,896          $ 7,555,034          $ 6,324,634
Net income per share .........              $     0.25          $      0.27          $      0.75          $      0.63

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
audited financial statements of E.Com International, Inc. and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,839,281
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    315,023
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,173,460
<PP&E>                                         435,845
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,614,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          529,947
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,386,025
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,268,146
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,614,249
<SALES>                                         25,237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,440
<CGS>                                           21,797
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,006,541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (29,784)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,013,746)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,003,101)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,013,746)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.46)


</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Andrew DIXON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-2511.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Dixon, Andrew; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 04-F-0085; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46024-RH.

Denied.

CLARK, J., recused.
#### Susan A. MORROW, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-4140.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 10, 2011.

Susan A. Morrow, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. *See Pettway v. State,*776 So.2d 930 (Fla.2000).

BENTON, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and SWANSON, JJ., concur.