alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 2 to 1997 Stock Option Plan


 Exhibit 4.7 
  

CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. 1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 AMENDMENT No. 2 
  
 INCREASING NUMBER OF SHARES
SUBJECT TO PLAN 
  
 The Company’s Board of Directors and
stockholders have approved and declared the advisability of amending the Company’s 1997 Stock Option Plan to increase the total number of shares subject to the Plan from 1,950,000 to 6,000,000. 
  
 This Amendment No. 1 hereby changes the first sentence of Article V Section
5.1 to read: 
  
 “Subject to adjustment pursuant to the
provisions of Section 5.2 hereof, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued and sold hereunder shall be 6,000,000.”
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6420

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TRACY DEMONT HUMPHRIES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (2:91-cr-00153-UA-2; 1:05-cv-00359-JAB)

Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: August 1, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tracy Demont Humphries, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tracy Demont Humphries seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his motion for modification of sentence

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), which the district court

construed as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Humphries has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the
- 3 -

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE ex rel. Manuel YOUNGBLOOD v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0483.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Youngblood, Manuel; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 248-956.

Denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, NORMAN E. DRAPEAU, JR., certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MRO Software, Inc.,
a Massachusetts Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 10, 2005

By: /s/ Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.
    -------------------------------------
Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 28, 2016

d1212

Order 

Clerk

December 28, 2016

153399

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153399

COA: 330298

Saginaw CC: 11-036678-FH

WILLIAM MAXIE, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2016 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
EXHIBIT 21

                      SUBSIDIARIES OF CORECOMM INCORPORATED

All of the corporations  listed below were incorporated in Delaware except where
otherwise noted:

Cellular Communications of Puerto Rico, Inc.
CCPR Services, Inc.
CCPR of the Virgin Islands, Inc.
CCPR Paging, Inc.
CoreComm Delaware, Inc.
CoreComm Maryland, Inc.
CoreComm Massachusetts, Inc.
CoreComm New Jersey, Inc.
CoreComm New York, Inc.
CoreComm Pennsylvania, Inc.
CoreComm Puerto Rico, Inc.
CoreComm Telco, Inc.
CoreComm Virginia, Inc.
Cortelyou Communications Corp.
Merrimack Telecommunications Corp. (Florida corporation)
San Juan Cellular Telephone Company (District of Columbia partnership)
SJCT, Inc.
USVI Cellular Telephone Corporation
USVI Paging, Inc.
Exhibit 32

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Xynergy Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Raquel Zepeda, Chief
Executive Officer, Chairman and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbannes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 23, 2005                    By: /s/ Raquel Zepeda
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Chief Executive Officer, Chairman
                                               and Director
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

OLGA SEGREAVES,

Respondent

v.

ROSS SEGREAVES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 239 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of December, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1191]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   THE 30TH ANNIVERSARY OF HEAD START

                                 ______

                          HON. DAVID E. BONIOR

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, June 7, 1995
  Mr. BONIOR. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to commemorate the 30th 
anniversary of Head Start. It is hard to believe that one of the most 
successful of the Great Society's programs is now 30 years old. For 
three decades this Federal program has been helping to improve the 
quality of life for children throughout out Nation.
  Head Start Works. It has proven to be successful in contributing to 
the readiness of children beginning school. It is far more than child 
care. It is a comprehensive program that provides health, nutrition, 
and family services. It involves parents by encouraging them to 
participate in classroom activities, accompanying children on field 
trips, becoming substitute teachers, and teaching them to help their 
children learn and grow. This family focus is one of the reasons Head 
Start has been so successful. Unfortunately, many parents are unable to 
participate on a regular basis because they must work. For these 
parents, Head Start is a Godsend. Without Head Start, many children 
would simply lack adequate supervision because their parents must 
struggle to pay the bills.
  Head Start is especially important for children with special needs. 
The identification of speech or language difficulties as well as more 
severe impairments allows early intervention to minimize and sometimes 
prevent the long-range effects of such obstacles. The health component 
provides youngsters an opportunity to have a complete health appraisal, 
another advantage that many of these children may not have had 
otherwise.
  Today, the Macomb County Community Services Agency [MCCSA] is hosting 
a Birthday celebration to mark the success they have had in many of the 
communities I have the privilege to represent. According to their 
mission statement, the challenge of MCCSA Head Start is to empower 
participants towards self-sufficiency and skill development thereby 
removing barriers which limit the realization of individual potential. 
Since the summer of 1965, the MCCSA Head Start program has been 
removing barriers for literally thousands of children. Originally a 
summer program serving barely 100 children, Head Start in Macomb County 
has grown to serve children in 41 classrooms and four home based 
clusters. A ``Community Action Agency,'' MCCSA is dedicated to families 
and individuals seeking to improve their quality of life. For thirty 
years they have been meeting the challenge with positive results.
  On this 30th anniversary, I applaud those who have made the program a 
success and I encourage my colleagues to join me in pledging continued 
support of Head Start.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE>




                                  EXHIBIT 12

                       CHORUS COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LTD.

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                     YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
                      1999      1998       1997      1996      1995

In Thousands
<S>                   <C>       <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>
Net Income*           $3,367    $5,171     $5,136    $4,741    $4,572

Income Tax
 Expense               2,110     3,394      3,218     2,932     2,781

Interest Charges       1,767     1,727      1,301     1,408     1,203

Total Earnings        $7,244    $10,292    $9,655    $9,081    $8,556

Interest Expense      $1,767    $1,727     $1,301    $1,408    $1,203

Ratio                   4.10      5.96       7.42      6.45      7.11


*For 1996, the amount is before extraordinary charge.
</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Clarence HAINES.

No. 2011-KK-2315.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re Haines, Clarence; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 505-414; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1220.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1264 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1264

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the dollar 
             limitation on contributions to funeral trusts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2007

Mr. Kind (for himself, Mr. Matheson, Mr. Camp of Michigan, Mr. Tiberi, 
   and Mr. Wilson of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the dollar 
             limitation on contributions to funeral trusts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF DOLLAR LIMITATION ON CONTRIBUTIONS TO FUNERAL 
              TRUSTS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 685 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to treatment of funeral trusts) is 
repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsections (d), (e), and (f) of such 
section are redesignated as subsections (c), (d), and (e), 
respectively.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael Kemper PERCY,

No. 2010-KO-1253.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 17, 2010.

In re Percy, Michael Kemper; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson Davis, 31st Judicial District Court Div. 0, No. CR-639-08-3; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 09-1319.

Denied.
Exhibit 8.1
 List of Significant Subsidiaries of United Microelectronics Corporation
 Percentage ofJurisdiction of
    
    Ownership as ofCompany
    
    Incorporation
    
    December 31, 2010UMC Group (USA)
    
    California, U.S.A.
    
    
    100.00
    %United Microelectronics (Europe) B.V.
    
    The Netherlands
    
    
    100.00
    %UMC Capital Corp.
    
    Cayman Islands
    
    
    100.00
    %TLC Capital Co., Ltd.
    
    Taiwan, R.O.C.
    
    
    100.00
    %UMC New Business Investment Corp.
    
    Taiwan, R.O.C.
    
    
    100.00
    %Alpha Wisdom Limited
    
    Cayman Islands
    
    
    100.00
    %Green Earth Limited
    
    Samoa
    
    
    100.00
    %Fortune Venture Capital Corp.
    
    Taiwan, R.O.C.
    
    
    100.00
    %UMC Japan
    
    Japan
    
    
    100.00
    %Unitruth Investment Corp.
    
    Taiwan, R.O.C.
    
    
    100.00
    %UMC Capital (U.S.A)
    
    California, U.S.A.
    
    
    100.00
    %ECP VITA Ltd.
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    
    100.00
    %Soaring Capital Corp.
    
    Samoa
    
    
    100.00
    %Unitruth Advisor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    China
    
    
    100.00
    %Mos Art Pack Corp.
    
    Taiwan, R.O.C.
    
    
    73.34
    %Nexpower Technology Corp.
    
    Taiwan, R.O.C.
    
    
    57.67
    %Wavetek Microelectronics Corporation
    
    Taiwan, R.O.C.
    
    
    99.79
    %United Lighting Opto-Electronic Inc.
    
    Taiwan, R.O.C.
    
    
    94.65
    %United Lighting Opto-Electronic
Investment (HK) Limited
    
    China
    
    
    94.65
    %Everrich Energy Corp.
    
    Taiwan, R.O.C.
    
    
    91.12
    %Everrich Energy Investment (HK) Limited
    
    China
    
    
    91.12
    %Everrich (Shandong) Energy Co.
(formerly Yongsheng (Shandong) Energy Co.)
    
    China
    
    
    91.12
    %Unistars Corp.
    
    Taiwan, R.O.C.
    
    
    65.63
    %Topcell Solar International Co. Ltd.
    
    Taiwan, R.O.C.
    
    
    51.49
    %Jenenergy System Corporation
    
    Taiwan, R.O.C.
    
    
    38.45
    %Smart Energy Enterprises Limited
    
    China
    
    
    38.45
    %Smart Energy ShanDong Corporation
    
    China
    
    
    38.45
    %
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,260,620
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     156,813,367
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 55,334,917
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      55,334,917
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        53,169,880
<LOANS>                                    131,629,479
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,197,843
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             199,772,678
<DEPOSITS>                                 177,701,967
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,283,324
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,081,526
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,826,617
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,308,168
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             199,772,678
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             10,153,373
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,589,106
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               194,832
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            13,936,861
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           6,429,810
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,533,175
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,403,686
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  335,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              34,751
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,712,458
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,933,066
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,933,066
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,175,378
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.83
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.72
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   793,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,011,935
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  164,584
<RECOVERIES>                                    15,492
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,197,843
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,197,843
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 143 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 143

     To provide for the security of critical energy infrastructure.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide for the security of critical energy infrastructure.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EVACUATION PLAN REVIEW.

    Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Energy shall transmit to the Congress a report of the 
Secretary's review of the fuel supply plan components of State 
evacuation plans and the National Capitol region. Such report shall 
determine the sufficiency of such plans, and shall include 
recommendations for improvements thereto. Annually after the 
transmittal of a report under this section, the Secretary shall 
transmit a report to the Congress assessing plans found insufficient 
under previous reports.

SEC. 2. DISASTER ASSISTANCE.

    (a) Authority.--During any federally declared emergency or 
disaster, the Secretary of Energy may provide direct assistance to 
private sector entities that operate critical energy infrastructure, 
including refineries.
    (b) Assistance.--Assistance under this section may include 
emergency preparation and recovery assistance, including power 
generation equipment, other protective or emergency recovery equipment, 
assistance to restore access to water, power, or other raw materials, 
and transportation and housing for critical employees. The Secretary 
may request assistance from other Federal agencies in carrying out this 
section.

SEC. 3. CRITICAL ENERGY ASSURANCE ACCOUNT.

    There is established in the Treasury an account known as the 
Critical Energy Assurance Account. The Secretary of Energy shall 
deposit into this account amounts appropriated to the Secretary for the 
purpose of carrying out this Act and payments paid to the Secretary by 
any non-Federal source for the purpose of carrying out this Act. The 
Secretary may receive and accept payments from any non-Federal source, 
and amounts deposited into the account, whether appropriated or 
received from a non-Federal source, shall be available to the 
Secretary, without further appropriation, for carrying out this Act.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    The Secretary of Energy may issue regulations necessary or 
appropriate to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```