alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Each of the
undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Petro Stopping Centers, L.P.
(the Company), that to his knowledge:



(1) The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This written statement is being furnished to the SEC as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2004 |  | /s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.               
|                      |  | (J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)                 
|                      |  | Chairman, Chief Executive            
|                      |  | Officer, and President               
|                      | 
|Date: August 10, 2004 |  | /s/ Edward Escudero                  
|                      |  | (Edward Escudero)                    
|                      |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>



                          CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF
                            AMENDED AND RESTATED
                        CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                     OF
                           UNIFIED HOLDINGS, INC.



           PURSUANT TO SECTION 242 OF THE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
                          OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

         Unified Holdings, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under
and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"), does hereby certify as follows:

         Through Joint Action by Consent of the Board of Directors and the
stockholders of Unified Holdings, Inc. dated as of December 15, 1997, a
resolution was duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to the
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (the
"Certificate of Incorporation"). Such resolution recommended that Article 1
of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following provision:

         The name of this Corporation is Unified Financial Services, Inc.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Unified Holdings, Inc. has caused this
Certificate of Amendment to be signed and attested by its duly authorized
officers as of this 15th day of December 1997.



                                  UNIFIED HOLDINGS, INC.


                                  By:/s/ Timothy L. Ashburn
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Timothy L. Ashburn, Chairman of the Board
                                     and Chief Executive Officer


Attest:



/s/ Carol J. Highsmith
------------------------------------
Carol J. Highsmith, Secretary
#### Robin M. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-5972.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 10, 2011.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 24, 2011.

Robin M. Williams, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. *See Logan v. State,*846 So.2d 472 (Fla.2003).

DAVIS, HAWKES, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57825-57826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23694]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7181]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Ancient Chinese Bronzes From the Shouyang Studio: The 
Katherine and George Fan Collection''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and

[[Page 57826]]

Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 
note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and 
Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby 
determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition ``Ancient 
Chinese Bronzes from the Shouyang Studio: The Katherine and George Fan 
Collection,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, from on or about 
November 5, 2010, until on or about January 2, 2011, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 16, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-23694 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winston Hotels, Inc.
(the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph
V. Green, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Joseph V. GreenName:
    
    Joseph V. GreenTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    August 6, 2004
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H5694-H5695]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          OVERSEAS INVESTMENT

  (Mrs. SEASTRAND asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Mrs. SEASTRAND. Mr. Speaker, when is a spending cut a spending cut? 
[[Page H5695]] Today, as we are considering the Overseas Interests Act 
that recognizes that we have won the cold war, we will answer that 
question.
  The bill we are considering today reduces, diminishes, lessens, 
curtails, lowers and yes, cuts foreign aid. It concentrates on cutting 
aid to countries that do not support us in the United Nations. It 
punishes the countries that supply weapons to terrorist states. It 
refocuses our efforts on the countries that do support American 
interests overseas.
  The new majority in this Congress are serious about cutting spending 
and eliminating agencies in this bill. We save the taxpayers $21 
billion over 7 years. That is a cut. We eliminate three major agencies 
in the first major restructuring of our foreign affairs operation in 50 
years. That is a cut.
  When is a spending cut a cut? It is today, when we debate and 
continue discussion on the Overseas Interests Act.

                          ____________________
```
583 A.2d 319

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALFREDO GARCIA.

February 6, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 30665 Summary Calendar

**Katrina Smith,** Plaintiff

— Appellant **,**

versus

**Wal**

**- Mart Louisiana, L.L.C.,**  Defendant

— Appellee

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court f

or the Western District of Louisiana No. 1:19

- CV

- 447

Before **Smith, Stewart,** and **Graves,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** * This is a retail slip

- and

- fall case brought to federal court by diversity of citizenship. The plaintiff, Katrina Smith, alleged , under the Louisiana

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opin

ion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 16, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Cle rk Case: 21-30665 Document: 00516242258 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/16/2022No. 21

- 30665

2 Liability Act, **La. Rev. Stat.** § 9.2800.6, that she slipped on a clear liquid and was injured. In a concise but comprehensive Memorandum Rul ing issued on Sep

tem ber 2, 2021, t he d istrict court granted summary judgment for the defen

dant, Wal

- Mart Louisiana, L.L.C. The court concluded that “Smith fails to provide any positive evidence establishing constructive notice and ʻ[m]ere speculation . . . is not sufficient to meet [Smith’s] burden and [this court] will not infer constructive notice for purposes of summary judgment where[her] allegations are no more likely than any other potential scenario.’” ( d istrict court’s alterations) (quoting Bagley v. Albertson’s, Inc. , 492 F.3d 328, 3 30 (5th Cir. 2007) )

. In so deciding, the court took careful note of Smith’s theory that sur

veil lance video supported her claim. We agree with the district court’s con

clusions based on its application of Louisiana law and the summary judgment evidenc e. On appeal, Smith avers that the district court should have allowed her to amend to add a complaint against a non

- diverse store employee who walked directly by a spill. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e), “[i]f after removal the plaintiff seeks to join addition al defendants whose joinder would destroy sub

ject matter jurisdiction, the court may deny joinder, or permit joinder and remand . . . .” The district court was well within its discretion to deny amend

ment to add a non

- diverse hourly employee who was in the course of per

forming general administrative duties. The summary judgment is **AFFIRMED** , essentially for the reasons amply explained in the Memorandum Ruling. Case: 21-30665 Document: 00516242258 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/16/2022
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
Exhibit 12.1

                       SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
               CALCULATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                         2002        2001       2000        1999        1998
                                                       ----------  ---------- ----------  ----------  ----------
<S>                                                     <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>         <C>

Net income                                              $115,928    $ 77,316   $ 86,813    $ 59,760    $ 66,475
Interest:
   Expense incurred                                       34,493      39,854     38,649      37,282      32,550
   Amortization of deferred financing costs                1,254       1,404      1,072         992         956
   Rental fixed charges                                      287         291        280         159         133
                                                       ----------  ---------- ----------  ----------  ----------
   Total                                                $151,962    $118,865   $126,814    $ 98,193    $100,114
                                                       ==========  ========== ==========  ==========  ==========

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense                                     $ 34,493    $ 39,854   $ 38,649    $ 37,282     $32,550
   Interest capitalized                                   10,360      11,080     11,117       7,888       6,143
   Dividends to preferred unitholders in
      operating partnership                               12,420      12,420     12,420       6,698           -
   Rental fixed charges                                      287         291        280         159         133
   Amortization of deferred financing costs                1,254       1,404      1,072         992         956
                                                       ----------  ---------- ----------  ----------  ----------
     Total                                              $ 58,814    $ 65,049   $ 63,538    $ 53,019    $ 39,782
                                                       ==========  ========== ==========  ==========  ==========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                          2.58        1.83       1.99        1.85        2.52
                                                       ==========  ========== ==========  ==========  ==========
</TABLE>
#### Nancy C. BRAZIL, Wife of/and Charles M. Brazil v. WAL-MART LOUISIANA, LLC and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al.

No. 2010-CC-2816.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2011.

In Re Brazil et al., Nancy C.; Brazil, Charles M.; —Plaintiffis); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 2008-14500; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 1665.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Carlton D. BROOKS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0066.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 17, 2010.

In re Brooks, Carlton D.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 225,723; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. KH 09^5030.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 89 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S7648]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         THANKING RUSSELL KING

  Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, in my role as Senate majority leader, I also 
serve as a member of the Joint Leadership Commission for our program 
for America's young people, the Congressional Award.
  As such, it is my responsibility, from time to time, to appoint 
individuals to serve on the Congressional Award Foundation's board of 
directors, which works with us to implement the program nationwide.
  Several years ago, when we were reorganizing the volunteer board, I 
asked Russell King, a senior vice president of Freeport-McMoran, if he 
would be willing to serve, and to make this program a truly national 
opportunity. He agreed, and has since become the foundation's 
treasurer, and two-term chairman, where he has presided over the 
exciting growth of the program.
  As Russ ends his tenure as chairman, I extend the appreciation of the 
Senate to him for his tireless devotion to the Congressional Award, and 
for his commitment to America's youth. We are fortunate that he will 
remain on the board, and will continue to work with us as this 
outstanding program grows throughout the country.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Stevens). The Senator from Maine

                          ____________________
```
**EXHIBIT 99.4**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATESCODE**

** **

I, Robert L. Weisgarber, the Chief Financial Officerof DSI Toys, Inc. (the “Company”), certify that:

 

# **(1)**                                  the Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on March 28, 2003,  (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

# **(2)**                                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of DSIToys, Inc..

 

 
|   | /s/ ROBERT L. WEISGARBER |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert L. Weisgarber     |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  |
|   | March 28, 2003           |

 

----
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

39 

CA 15-01137 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

JGB PROPERTIES, LLC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

IRONWOOD, L.L.C., STEELWAY REALTY CORPORATION,

TOWN OF CLAY, 4550 STEELWAY BOULEVARD, LLC, 

PLAINVILLE FARMS, LLC, JSF SERVICES, LLC, CSX 

TRANSPORTATION, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, 

ET AL., DEFENDANTS. 

 

CAMARDO LAW FIRM, P.C., AUBURN (SALVATORE D. FERLAZZO OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (JANET D. CALLAHAN OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS IRONWOOD, L.L.C., STEELWAY REALTY CORPORATION,

4550 STEELWAY BOULEVARD, LLC, PLAINVILLE FARMS, LLC, AND JSF SERVICES,

LLC. 

NIXON PEABODY LLP, ROCHESTER (TERENCE L. ROBINSON, JR., OF COUNSEL),

FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. 

ROBERT M. GERMAIN, TOWN ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE, D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS.

(JOHN A. CIRANDO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT TOWN OF CLAY. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Hugh

A. Gilbert, J.), entered September 8, 2014. The order, among other

things, dismissed the first amended complaint against defendants

Ironwood, L.L.C., Steelway Realty Corporation, Town of Clay, 4550

Steelway Boulevard, LLC, Plainville Farms, LLC, JSF Services, LLC, and

CSX Transportation, Inc. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: February 5, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       539,261
<SECURITIES>                               5,001,860
<RECEIVABLES>                              3,071,240
<ALLOWANCES>                               (240,841)
<INVENTORY>                                3,232,893
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          11,898,820
<PP&E>                                     5,577,954
<DEPRECIATION>                           (2,186,911)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            16,060,574       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,521,583
<BONDS>                                      142,858
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        9
<COMMON>                                     108,552
<OTHER-SE>                                14,287,574        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              16,060,574          
<SALES>                                    2,101,799
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           2,101,799
<CGS>                                      1,243,190
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,243,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           2,787,144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (1,834,913)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (1,834,913)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                             (1,834,913)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.182)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.182)  
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jason D. CLAYTON.

No. 2011-KO-1015.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Clayton, Jason D.; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Avoyelles, 12th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 152185; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KA 10-1303.

Denied.
583 A.2d 302

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THOMAS C. DAVIS.

January 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
No. 87-6257.

#### Almeida-Biffi *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Bridgette Gravois ORTEGA v. Koury J. ORTEGA.

No. 2011-C-0170.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2011.

In re Ortega, Bridgette Gravois; -Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 120334; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1003.

Denied.
#### In re William M. CLAUDEL.

No. 2011-OB-1662.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

ORDER

It Considering the Petition for Transfer to Active Status filed by respondent, and the response thereto filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that William M. Clau-del, Louisiana Bar Roll number 4168, be immediately reinstated to the practice of law, subject to the condition that he must execute a new five-year recovery agreement with the Lawyers Assistance Program. Respondent shall fully and completely adhere to all terms of the recovery agreement, and such other conditions as may be imposed upon him by the Lawyers Assistance Program. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel shall monitor respondent’s compliance with his recovery agreement and notify this court of any violation, which may be grounds for immediately returning respondent to disability inactive status. FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Marcus R. Clark

/s/ Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana
News United States Air Force
 Cadet earns top Civil Air Patrol honorPublished Nov. 9, 2015
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs Command Information
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Welsh III presented the General Carl A. Spaatz Award to Cadet Col. Matthew Jackson, a Civil Air Patrol cadet, during a Nov. 9 ceremony at the Pentagon.
“We’re recognizing Matt as he joins an elite group,” Welsh said. “Just 0.2 -- not 2.2 -- percent of Civil Air Patrol cadets earn the Spaatz award.”
The Spaatz award was established in 1964 and is the Civil Air Patrol’s highest cadet honor. Cadets qualify for the award after devoting an average of five years to progress through 16 achievements in the CAP’s cadet program, culminating in a rigorous four-part exam including a physical fitness test, essay exam on moral reasoning, comprehensive written exam on leadership, and a comprehensive written exam on aerospace education.
Upon passing all Spaatz award exams, the cadet is promoted to the rank of cadet colonel. Since its inception, only 2,003 cadets have earned the Spaatz award -- on average, two out of every 1,000.
Jackson serves in the Twin Pine Composite Squadron of the New Jersey Wing, West Trenton, New Jersey.CSAF 



cadet