alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Welsh named 2015 Great American Patriot Award recipientPublished Dec. 18, 2015
                **FORT WORTH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Welsh III has been named the 2015 Armed Forces Bowl’s Great American Patriot Award recipient.The Great American Patriot Award honors a candidate in recognition of their exemplary service to this nation."This award is not about me, but honors the more than 660,000 Airmen who make the United States Air Force the greatest in the world," Welsh said. "Each one of them is a patriot in their own right and I couldn't be more proud to serve alongside such dedicated Americans."The general will receive the award Dec. 29 during halftime of the 2015 Armed Forces Bowl, which pits Welsh's alma mater, the U.S. Air Force Academy, against the University of California, Berkeley."General Welsh is exactly the type of individual we envisioned when we created the Great American Patriot Award 10 years ago," said Brant Ringler, the executive director of the Armed Forces Bowl. "We couldn't be more proud to add his name alongside our previous recipients as he has proven his leadership and dedication to our country countless times throughout his career."Welsh is responsible for the organizing, training and equipping of more than 660,000 Airmen serving around the globe. As the senior uniformed officer of America's Air Force, Welsh is also a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, where he and other service chiefs serve as military advisers to the secretary of defense, National Security Council and the president."Following graduation from the U.S. Air Force Academy, he has held a plethora of diverse billets in ever-increasing positions of responsibility that prepared him well for his current role as chief of staff of the U.S. Air Force," said retired Marine Lt. Gen. Garry L. Parks,  the chairman of Armed Forces Insurance, which administers the award.Candidates for the award must be of high moral fiber and good character, having spent their lives and/or careers serving the common good of the U.S. They should have gone beyond the call of duty to serve and protect this country, with proven dedication and loyalty in upholding the Constitution and the laws of the nation. Finally, the Great American Patriot Award winner should have worked tirelessly to make the U.S. a better and safer place for all its citizens.Welsh will be the second Air Force Academy graduate to receive this award. Retired Gen. Norton Schwartz, the 19th Air Force chief of staff, received the award in 2012. In addition to Gens. Welsh and Schwartz, previous winners of the Great American Patriot Award include Marine Gen. Peter Pace, Medal of Honor recipient Salvatore Giunta and Adm. William McRaven.CSAF 



U.S. Air Force Academy 



football 



award
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23


          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-50811), pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, the 1997
Performance Stock Option Plan, the 1997 Non-Employee Directors Option Plan
and the 1997 Amended Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Faroudja, Inc., of our
report dated January 25, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Faroudja, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                           /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 29,2000




                                     -60-
---

Exhibit 10.61

















February 4, 2010








Ms. Bridget Rainero


CapitalSource Finance LLC


4445 Willard Avenue, 12th Floor


Chevy Chase, MD 20815





Re:  Extension Request of the $50MM Inventory Line








Dear Bridget:





Under the first amendment to the Amended and Restated Inventory Loan and Security Agreement dated June 4, 2008, the Borrower, Silverleaf Resorts, Inc., has the right to request (i) an extension of the commitment period from April 30, 2010 to April 30, 2011, and (ii) an extension of the maturity date from April 30, 2012 to April 30, 2013.  The Borrower is hereby exercising the option under Section 2.9 to request (i) an extension of the commitment period to April 30, 2011, and (ii) an extension of the maturity date to April 30, 2013, and is wiring the sum of $125,000 for the extension fee.  For any further amendments or agreements to be executed, please forward to my attention.





As always, we appreciate the long-term relationship between our companies, and please let me know if you shall need anything further.








Sincerely,








/s/ HARRY J. WHITE, JR.


Harry J. White, Jr., CFO


Silverleaf Resorts, Inc.








1221 River Bend Drive · Suite 120 · Dallas, Texas, 75247 · 214-631-1166 · Fax 214-631-4981
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

Statement Concerning Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                      Historical                                   Pro Forma
                                                -------------------------------------------------------         -----------------
                                                                Year Ended December 31,                            Year Ended
                                                 1993        1994        1995         1996       1997           December 31, 1997
                                                -------------------------------------------------------         -----------------
<S>                                             <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>                 <C>    
Earnings:
     Income from continuing operations
          before provision for income taxes     $ 3,221     $ 4,032     $ 3,058     $ 8,409     $18,984             $15,937
     Interest expense                             1,426       1,642       3,609       4,759       4,664               7,351
     Interest component of rent expense              20          44          87         119         227                 227
     Amortization of previously capitalized
          interest                                                                      497         520                 520
                                                -------     -------     -------     -------     -------             -------
Earnings                                        $ 4,667     $ 5,718     $ 6,754     $13,784     $24,395             $24,035
                                                =======     =======     =======     =======     =======             =======

Fixed Charges:
     Interest expense                           $ 1,426     $ 1,642     $ 3,609     $ 4,759     $ 4,664             $ 7,351
     Interest capitalized                                                   516         711         823                 823
     Interest component of rent expense              20          44          87         119         227                 227
                                                -------     -------     -------     -------     -------             -------
Fixed charges                                   $ 1,446     $ 1,686     $ 4,212     $ 5,589     $ 5,714             $ 8,401
                                                =======     =======     =======     =======     =======             =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  3.2         3.4         1.6         2.5         4.3                 2.9
</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gerald CHINN.

No. 2010-KK-2462.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 17, 2010.

In re Chinn, Gerald; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. B, Nos. 09-09-0996, 09-09-0999; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 0916.

Denied.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of United Microelectronics Corporation, or the Company, on Form
20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, or the Report, I, Po-Wen Yen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 26, 2013

|    |  |                |  |                        
|--- |  | -------------- |  | -----------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Po-Wen Yen
|    |  | Name:          |  | Po-Wen Yen             
|    |  | Title:         |  | Chief Executive Officer





|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7371

PATRICIA HARRISON HAWLEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WENDY HOBBS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-00258-TSE) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: June 9, 2008 Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia Harrison Hawley, Appellant Pro Se. Josephine Frances Whalen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Patricia Harrison Hawley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hawley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, being, Ronald T. Linares, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|/s/ Ronald T. Linares                                    
|Ronald T. Linares                                        
|Vice President and Chief Accounting and Financial Officer

March 31, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1470 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1470

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2007

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Programs 
 Enhancement Act of 2001 to require the provision of chiropractic care 
and services to veterans at all Department of Veterans Affairs medical 
                                centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chiropractic Care Available to All 
Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. PROGRAM FOR PROVISION OF CHIROPRACTIC CARE AND SERVICES TO 
              VETERANS.

    Section 204(c) of the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care 
Programs Enhancement Act of 2001 (38 U.S.C. 1710 note) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``The program''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) The program shall be carried out at not fewer than 75 medical 
centers by not later than December 31, 2009, and at all medical centers 
by not later than December 31, 2011.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**EXCHANGE
      ACT RULE 15D-14(B) AND**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation
      (the ”Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Michael E. Drace, President and Chief Executive Officer
      of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange
      Act
      Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





i.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





ii.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation and will
      be
      retained by U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation. and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








By:
            /s/
                Michael E.
                DraceName:
            Michael
                E. DraceTitle:
            President
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
            October
                25, 2006
#### Elveta DAIGRE, individually and as administratrix of the Estate of William R. Daigre III, and Scott Daigre, William Daigre IV, and Richard Daigre v. INTERNATIONAL TRUCK AND ENGINE CORPORATION, Fort Worth Fabrication, Inc., Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, and Bowie Lumber Associates.

No. 2011-C-1099.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re Daigre IV, William; Daigre, Elve-ta et al.; Daigre, Richard; Daigre, Scott; Estate of William R. Daigre III; — Plaintiffs); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. M, No. 2004-3727; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-1379.

Denied.
<PAGE>

                                  LEONARD OSSER
                               110 E. 71ST STREET
                               NEW YORK, NY 10021




                                                     April 15, 2003


Milestone Scientific Inc.
220 South Orange Avenue
Livingston, NJ 07039
Attn: Thomas Stuckey-Chief Financial Officer

         RE:      Milestone Scientific Inc.
                  Deferral of Payment of $32,000

Dear Sirs:

         Please be advised that I hereby agree to defer until January 2, 2005
the payment of principal and any interest on a $32,000 loan I have made to
Milestone Scientific Inc. in January 2003.


                                                     Very truly yours,


                                                     /s/ Leonard Osser
News United States Air Force
 Fiscal stability, readiness key focus of service chiefs testimonyPublished Sept. 15, 2016
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Natalie Stanley
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Dave Goldfein testified to the U.S. Senate on Capitol Hill Sept. 15 emphasizing the need for fiscal stability to combat the long-term modernization and readiness challenges facing the Air Force.“We need the flexibility to retire aging weapon systems and reduce excess infrastructure in order to afford the technology needed to maintain our advantage,” Goldfein said. “If we don’t have stable budgets, we mortgage the future to pay for the current readiness.”The senior officers of the Army, Navy and Marine Corps also testified on behalf of their services. The common refrain was the crucial requirement of a stable, long-term budget to maintain a modern military force capable of defeating the nation’s adversaries. They agreed the current year-to-year budgeting policy is detrimental to comprehensive military capabilities.“We will be forced to continually make strategic trades to simultaneously sustain legacy fleets, while smartly investing in modernization and the future technologies required to meet combatant commander demands,” Goldfein said.Goldfein added readiness and morale are crucially linked components necessary to sustain an operational fighting force. He said he believes Airmen should be given every opportunity to succeed in their chosen occupations.“Pilots who don’t fly, maintainers who don’t maintain, controllers who don’t control will walk,” Goldfein said. “There’s not enough money in the treasury to keep them in if we don’t give them the resources they need to be the best they can be.”Goldfein’s written testimony presented to the Senate Armed Services Committee emphasized Air Force readiness realities triggered by funding under a continuing resolution.If enacted at fiscal year 2016 levels, a continuing resolution would result in Air Force funding $1.3 billion less than requested, limited procurement quantities for munitions, and delay adequate quantities on contracts -- potentially limiting the availability of air strikes against Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and other future threats.Goldfein called on senate leaders to secure a return to stable budgets without extended continuing resolutions.“Current global security demands remind us that America’s joint team must be ready to engage anytime, anywhere, across the full spectrum of conflict,” Goldfein said. “America expects it and with your support our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, and Marines will deliver it.”CSAF 



Army 



Navy 



Marine Corps
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER
Appellate case name: Sunbelt Securities, Inc., Jeanine Fisher, Cheryl Brown, The Fisher Group, and Monique Mandell v. David Mandell & Raymond J. Black, Administrator of the Estate of William Mandell, Deceased
Appellate case number: 01

- 2 1

- 00 209

- CV

Trial court case number: 473747

- 402

Trial court: Probate Court No. 1 of Harris County

On April 28 , 202 1

, appellants, Sunbelt Securities, Inc., Jeanine Fisher, Cheryl Brown, and The Fisher Group (the “Sunbelt appellants”) filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s April 9, 2021 order denying the Sunbelt appellants’ motion to compel arbitration. On April 29, 2021, appellant, Monique Mandell (“Mandell”) filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s April 9, 2021 order denying Mandell’s motion to compel arbitration. The Sunbelt appellants’ brief was filed on June 18, 2021, and Mandell’s appellant’s brief was filed on June 21, 2021. Appellees, David Mandell and Raymond J. Black, Administrator of the Estate of William Mandell, Deceased, each filed their brief on July 28, 2021. The Sunbelt appellants have filed a motion for extension of time to file a repl y brief, requesting that the deadline to file a reply brief be extended to August 31, 2021. The Sunbelt appellants’ motion includes a certificate of conference representing that counsel for appellee David Mandell and appellant Monique Mandell are unop posed to the relief requested, but that “[c]ounsel for the other parties did not respond

. ” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 10.1(a)(5). The Sunbelt appellants’ motion is granted

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 10.3(a)(1). The Sunbelt appellants’ reply brief, if any, is due to be filed with this Court no later than A ugust 31 , 2021

. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: _____ /s/ Amparo Guerra

_________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ____ August 24 , 2021

______