alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.65

                   FOURTH AMENDMENT TO COST SHARING NATIONAL
                                 IRU AGREEMENT


     THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO COST SHARING NATIONAL IRU AGREEMENT ("Amendment")
is made and entered into as of the ____ day of April 2000, by and between LEVEL
3 COMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Grantor") and
SPLITROCK SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Grantee"). This Amendment
modifies and amends that certain Cost Sharing National IRU Agreement dated April
26, 1999 between Grantor and Grantee (the "Agreement").

     Whereas, for good and valuable consideration, Grantor and Grantee hereby
agree as follows:

1.  Amendment.  Grantor and Grantee hereby amend Section 3.02 of the Agreement
    ---------
    by deleting the second sentence in its entirety and inserting in lieu
    thereof the following sentence:

         The Option may be exercised by Grantee by written notice
         to Grantor referring specifically to this Section 3.02
         delivered at any time prior to June 30, 2000 (the
         "Option Period"); provided, Grantor may, in its sole
         discretion, extend the Option Period if Grantor
         determines that fibers are available in the Grantor
         Cable to serve as the Option Fibers.

2. Ratification.  Except as amended by the First, Second, Third and this Fourth
   ------------
   Amendment, the original terms and provisions of the Agreement shall continue
   in full force and effect and the Agreement, as amended by the First, Second,
   Third and this Fourth Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed.

3.  Counterparts.  This Fourth Amendment may be executed in counterparts and may
    ------------
    be delivered by facsimile transmission.


LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC           SPLITROCK SERVICES, INC.



By: ____________________________      By: __________________________

Title: _________________________      Title: _______________________

Date: __________________________      Date: ________________________
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00687-CR

Jesus Villalobos, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-13-600008, THE HONORABLE CLIFFORD BROWN, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant filed his notice of appeal in the trial court on October 16, 2013. After

granting multiple requests of Kimberly Lee, the court reporter, for extensions of time to file the

reporter’s record, this Court sent a notice to Ms. Lee informing her that the reporter’s record is

overdue. In response, Ms. Lee filed a notice stating that record would be filed on July 2, 2014. To

date, the reporter’s record has not been filed, and we have received no further communications from

Ms. Lee.

We therefore order Ms. Lee to prepare and tender the reporter’s record in this cause

for filing no later than July 28, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c), 37.3(a)(2). No further extensions
will be granted. The failure to tender the record by that date will result in Ms. Lee being called

before this Court to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court for violating

this order.

It is so ordered on this the 16th day of July, 2014.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Do Not Publish

2
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OR 15D-14(A) OF THE**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY**

**ACT OF 2002**

 

I, William Frederick, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Versata, Inc.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

Date: January 28, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,585,167
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,861,222
<PP&E>                                       8,445,737
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,244,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,067,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,939,716
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        98,591
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,225,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,067,553
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,262,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             122,883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,340,612)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,340,612)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,340,612)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 1999, and the consolidated income
statement for the nine months ended September 30, 1999, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,169
<SECURITIES>                                       918
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,901
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,282
<INVENTORY>                                     10,084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,188
<PP&E>                                         225,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 245,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,577
<BONDS>                                        113,891
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,317
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   245,238
<SALES>                                         99,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,626
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,429
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,444
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,063
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,063
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,063
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12


</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1502 

To treat certain payments made by Edmond, Oklahoma, as satisfying its 

obligations under the water storage control for Lake Arcadia, Oklahoma, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2007 

Ms. FALLIN (for herself and Mr. COLE of Oklahoma) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To treat certain payments made by Edmond, Oklahoma, 

as satisfying its obligations under the water storage control for Lake Arcadia, Oklahoma, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ARCADIA LAKE, OKLAHOMA. 

4 Payments made by the city of Edmond, Oklahoma, 

5 to the Secretary of the Army in October 1999 of costs 

6 associated with present and future water storage at Arca7 dia Lake, Oklahoma, under Arcadia Lake Water Storage 

8 Contract Number DACW56–79–C–0072 shall satisfy the 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1502 IH

1 obligations of the city under that contract for such costs, 

2 including accrued interest. 

3 SEC. 2. OKLAHOMA LAKE DEMONSTRATION, OKLAHOMA. 

4 (a) RELEASE OF RETAINED RIGHTS, INTERESTS, 

5 AND RESERVATIONS.—Each reversionary interest and use 

6 restriction relating to public parks and recreation on the 

7 land conveyed by the Secretary of the Army to the State 

8 of Oklahoma at Lake Texoma pursuant to the Act entitled 

9 ‘‘An Act to authorize the sale of certain lands to the State 

10 of Oklahoma’’ (67 Stat. 63) is terminated. 

11 (b) INSTRUMENT OF RELEASE.—As soon as prac12 ticable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Sec13 retary shall execute and file in the appropriate office a 

14 deed of release, an amended deed, or another appropriate 

15 instrument to release each interest and use restriction de16 scribed in subsection (a). 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
#### J. C. Carswell v. T. B. Crowther.

(No. 6598.)

Appeal from El Paso County.

Nugent & Stanton, counsel for appellant. No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

*217June 25, 1890.

§ 153. *Appeal; will not be entertained unless the record shoius a final judgment in the trial court.*Appellant brought this suit by sequestration to recover certain personal property or baggage alleged to have been unlawfully and maliciously seized and withheld from him by appellee, and praying for actual and exemplary damages. Among other defenses appellee pleaded specially that she was an hotel-keeper; that appellant and family became guests of her hotel; and that he owed her as a balance due for board, $91.40, for which she had a boardinghouse or hotel-keeper’s lien upon his personal property or baggage; and she prayed a foreclosure of her said lien. Appellant himself insists that no final judgment was rendered at the trial in the court below, and the record supports this position. Under such state of case *we*do not feel called upon to discuss the several errors complained of. There being no final judgment, this court will hot entertain an appeal in the case. [Fitzgerald v. Evans, 53 Tex. 461; 1 Civil Cas. Ct. App., § 310; Mayfield v. State, 40 Tex. 290.]

Appeal dismissed.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

MICHAEL KENNETH BARRON, No. 08-18-00178-CR

§

APPELLANT, Appeal from the

§

V. County Court at Law No. 1

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS, of El Paso County, Texas

§

APPELLEE. (TC# 20150C09163)

§

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Michael Kenneth Barron, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal pursuant to 

Rule 42.2. This rule permits an appellate court to dismiss a criminal appeal on the appellant's 

motion at any time before the court’s decision. TEX.R.APP.P. 42.2(a). Finding that Appellant's 

motion complies with the requirements of Rule 42.2(a), we grant the motion and dismiss the 

appeal.

January 11, 2019 YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
News United States Air Force
 Joint US forces support Nepal earthquake relief efforts in ThailandPublished May 11, 2015
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Alexander Martinez
                        
                        
                        Joint Task Force-505 Public Affairs
                **U-TAPAO ROYAL THAI NAVY AIRFIELD, Thailand (AFNS) --**
                In support of Operation Sahayogi Haat, Airmen, Soldiers, Sailors and Marines are ensuring humanitarian assistance and disaster relief supplies and personnel are moving smoothly in and out of Nepal at an intermediate staging base (ISB) at U-Tapao Royal Thai Navy Airfield, Thailand.
At the ISB, Joint Task Force-505 personnel monitor satellite and radio communications with other JTF-505 components throughout the region, and support air operations to ensure the government and people of Nepal receive the support they need to help recover from the devastating 7.8-magnitude earthquake that struck the country April 25.
Air Force Brig. Gen. Michael Minihan, the JTF-505 Joint Air Component Coordination Element commander, explained the role of the mission in Thailand, and highlighted its importance to the overall Nepal earthquake relief mission.
"We've set up an intermediate staging base that can help airpower and airlift, specifically U.S. Marine and Air Force air (capabilities), and rapidly move those unique capabilities in and out of Nepal," Minihan said. "This JTF-505 is significant because it shows that the partnerships in this region are important, and all the exercises and engagements that we do throughout this region have a real-world application so that when an incident happens like the earthquake in Nepal, we can rapidly come together ... and instantly have a positive impact and do what we need to do for the government and the people of Nepal."
The JTF-505 mission in Thailand has been able to move tons of cargo and hundreds of support personnel into Kathmandu, the capital of Nepal and a region significantly impacted by the earthquake.
Additionally, Royal Thai Armed Forces work with the JTF-505 at the ISB to coordinate earthquake relief support with the Thai government.
Marine Corps Lt. Col. Matthew Youngblood, the JTF-505 JACCE officer in charge, said working jointly with the other services and the Thai government has been important to the earthquake relief mission.
"It has been an exceptional experience working with our service counterparts, and we look forward to continuing cooperation with the Thai government, and our continued services' support to the people of Nepal," Youngblood said.
U.S. Pacific Command activated JTF 505 on May 1 to work closely with the U.S. Department of State, U.S. Agency for International Development and other U.S. agencies to ensure a timely and thorough response to requests by the Government of Nepal.Sailors 



Marines 



U-Tapao Royal Thai Navy Airfield 



Thailand 



Nepal 



relief 



Humanitarian 



joint 



Operation Sahayogi Haat 



Soldiers
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Docucorp International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John H.
Gray, Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ John H. Gray
------------------------------------
John H. Gray
Senior Vice President, Finance and
Administration
(Principal Financial Officer)
October 14, 2004




                                       64
**Exhibit
      23**










Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







The
      Board
      of Directors


RC2
      Corporation:




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
      333-50957, 333-50959, 333-58035, 333-58037, 333-81705, 333-91158, 333-91236
      and
      333-133238) on Form S-8 of RC2 Corporation of our reports dated February 28,
      2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of RC2 Corporation as
      of
      December 31, 2005 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
      stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
      three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and the related financial statement
      schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
      over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, and the effectiveness of
      internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports
      appear in the December 31, 2006, annual report on Form 10-K of RC2
      Corporation.






/s/KPMG
      LLP






Chicago,
      Illinois




February
      28, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

	

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 

Pursuant to Section 906 

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Tripos, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(b)	information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

	/s/ John P. McAlister
	John P. McAlister

	Chief Executive Officer

	August 6, 2004

 

	/s/ B. James Rubin
	B. James Rubin

	Chief Financial Officer

	August 6, 2004
AMERICAN SAVINGS (logo) BANK

February 7, 1997


As of and for the twelve month period ended December 31, 1996,  American Savings
Bank,  F. A. has complied in all material  respects  with the minimum  servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association  of America's  UNIFORM
SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS. As of and for this same period,
American Savings Bank had in effect an errors and omissions policy in the amount
of $22,500,000. Also, American Savings Bank had in EFFECT a fidelity bond in the
amount of  $35,000,000  from January 1, 1996 to December  19,  1996,  and in the
amount of $60,000,000 for the period of December 20, 1996 to December 30, 1996.


/s/ Robert T. Barnum
Robert T. Barnum, President


/s/ Robert B. Henske
Robert B. Henske, Chief Financial Officer



We call to your attention that on 12/20/96
the Bank and certain related entities were 
merged with Washington Mutual, Inc. ("WMI"), 
and that on 12/31/96 Robert B. Henske ("Henske")
was terminated as Chief Financial Officer
of the Bank. Henske makes no representation 
regarding any matter subsequent to 12/31/96.




         17877 Van Karman Avenue 5th Floor Irvine, California 99714-6213