alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M A RG A LEN A G ERBA CI O - G A SPA R, a. k. a. M ar gari t a M oral es -C ruz, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 71946 A ge nc yN o. A 099- 581- 009 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2012 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M ar ga l e naG e rba c i o- G a s par , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s orderdi sm i ss i ng her app ea l fr om an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h e rap p lic a tio n f o rw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. 

# FI LED DE C 21 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 71946 2 W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence f a c tu a l f in d in g s , Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 453 F . 3d 1182, 1184- 85 ( 9th C i r . 2006) , and we d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. S ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the a ge nc y ’ s f i ndi ng tha tanyharm G e rba c i oG a s para l l e ge d orf

e ar s i s noton a c c ountof apr ot e c t e d gr ound. See Zet i no v. H older , 6 2 2 F .3 d1 0 0 7 , 1 0 1 5 - 1 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ; see a l so P arussim ova v. Mukasey , 55 5 F . 3d 73 4, 74 0 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( “ [t ] he R ea l ID A ctre qu i re s thata prot ec t ed g r o u n dr e p r e s e n t ‘o n e c e n tr a l r e a s o n ’ f o ran a s y lu m ap p lic an t’s p e r s e c u tio n ” ) . A c c o r d in g ly , G e rb a c io - G a s p ar ’s w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im f

a ils . Se e Ze t i no at 1015- 16. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
#### Juliette ANTOINE, Appellant, v. Juan C. VIVES, Appellee.

No. 3D10-2947.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 13, 2011.

Rehearing Denied May 10, 2011.

Juliette Antoine, in proper person.

Ricardo R. Vives, for appellee.

Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and EMAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See*§ 45.0315, Fla. , Stat. (2010) (providing statutory right of redemption provides holder of any subordinate interest with right to cure the mortgagor’s indebtedness and prevent a foreclosure sale at any time before the later of the filing of a certificate of sale, or time specified in the judgment of foreclosure); *See also Saidi v. Wasko,*687 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (holding that the right of redemption is an estate in land and a protected equitable right of the mortgagor; it allows the mortgagor to reclaim her estate in foreclosed property after it has been forfeited by paying the amount of the debt, interest and costs. A mortgagor need not obtain permission of the trial court before exercising the right of redemption).
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 59750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24396]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 at 11 a.m.

PLACE: Commission hearing room, 901 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 200, 
Washington, DC 20268-0001.

STATUS: Most items on the agenda will be considered in a session open 
to public observation. Several items will be considered in a session 
closed to public observation. The open session will be audiocast.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC: 
    1. Review of postal-related congressional activity.
    2. Report on international activities.
    3. Review of active cases.
    4. Report on recent activites of the Joint Periodicals Task Force 
and status of the report to the Congress pursuant to secton 708 of the 
PAEA.
    5. Report on the October 1 budgetary meeting at OMB.
    6. Report on vacancies and positions recently filled.

PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC: 

    7. Discussion of pending litigation.
    8. Discussion of confidential personnel issues.
    9. Discussion of contracts involving confidential commercial 
information.

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Stephen L. Sharfman, General 
Counsel, Postal Regulatory Commission, at 202-789-6820 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a2d1d6c7d2cac7cc8cd1cac3d0c4cfc3cce2d2d0c18cc5cdd4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d1a2a5b4a1b9b4bfffa2b9b0a3b7bcb0bf91a1a3b2ffb6bea7">[email protected]</span></a> (for questions concerning the agenda) and 
Shoshana M. Grove at 202-789-6842 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f083989f8398919e91de97829f8695b0808293de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="83f0ebecf0ebe2ede2ade4f1ecf5e6c3f3f1e0ade4ecf5">[email protected]</span></a> (for 
questions concerning audiocasting or matters related to public 
observation).

    Dated: September 24, 2010.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24396 Filed 9-24-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended October 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David E. Ullman,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto the best of my knowledge:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.
| December 5, 2005 | /s/ DAVID E.  ULLMAN |
|-----------------------|---------------------------|
|                  | David E. Ullman      |
|                  | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the inclusion in this Form 10-K and the incorporation by reference
into the Registrant's previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-3
(File No. 333-43641) of our report dated February 17, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule of First
Industrial, L.P. and our report dated February 17, 1998 on our audits of the
combined financial statements of the Other Real Estates Partnerships.


                                              COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Chicago, Illinois
March 31, 1998
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of United Microelectronics Corporation (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chitung Liu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 26, 2006



By:

/s/ Chitung LiuName:

Chitung LiuTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of OmniComm Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, being, Ronald T. Linares, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ronald T. Linares                                    
|Ronald T. Linares                                        
|Vice President and Chief Accounting and Financial Officer
|                                                         
|June 16, 2008
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1122]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

        TRIBUTE TO THE SAN BERNARDINO AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY

                                 ______

                            HON. JERRY LEWIS

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, May 24, 1995
  Mr. LEWIS of California. Mr. Speaker, I would like to bring to your 
attention the fine work and outstanding public service of the American 
Legion auxiliary, San Bernardino unit, which recently celebrated its 
75th anniversary of service to our community and our Nation.
  The San Bernardio American Legion auxiliary has a long and proud 
tradition of dedication and outstanding service. At the very first 
meeting held on April 10, 1920, at the Women's Club House and presided 
over by Mrs. R.F. Gardner, 18 names were listed on the original 
charter. At that time, the auxiliary was organized to safeguard and 
convey to America's youth the ideas and principles upon which our 
Republic was built, to foster allegiance and respect for our flag, and 
to offer support for the men and women who served in the Armed Forces. 
These responsibilities the women of the San Bernardino auxiliary took 
seriously in their service to our community, State, and country.
  The minutes from those early meetings are intriguing and offer 
insights into the concerns of that time. Purchasing savings bonds, 
entertaining patients at Arrowhead Hospital, working with the poor, and 
honoring our flag were several subjects discussed in those early days.
  Over the years, auxiliary members have served in World War II, Korea, 
Vietnam, Panama, and Operation Desert Storm. Its members have 
participated in Operation Send-Off at the former Norton Air Force Base, 
savings bonds drives, health programs for the children of our veterans, 
scholarships to our community youth, and working with the American Red 
Cross, and other worthy organizations. That spirit of giving and 
support continues to this day as members of the auxiliary work with and 
provide assistance for the veterans, their families, and children in 
their homes, and at the Jerry L. Pettis VA Hospital in Loma Linda.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask that you join me, our colleagues, and our many 
friends in recognizing the many fine achievements and selfless 
contributions of the American Legion auxiliary in San Bernardino. Over 
the years, the auxiliary has touched the lives of many people and it is 
only fitting that the House of Representatives recognize this 
outstanding organization today.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 Air Force approves Turkey incentive payPublished Oct. 14, 2016
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Active-duty Airmen assigned to Turkey between Aug. 29, 2016, and Dec. 31, 2018, may be eligible for the secretary of the Air Force-approved Turkey Assignment Incentive Pay.
Airmen may apply for TAIP at three points in time: prior to departing their losing station, within 30 days of arrival in Turkey, or during their date eligible for return overseas forecast and initial vulnerable to move list windows. The TAIP rate is $300 per month.
Airmen currently serving an unaccompanied tour of 12 or 15 months, who are within 30 days of arrival and agree to serve a total of 24 months in Turkey, will receive TAIP with a payment effective date based on when the Airman elects the incentive. 
Airmen currently serving an unaccompanied tour of 12 or 15 months, who have been assigned in Turkey for more than 30 days, may elect TAIP if they extend their date of estimated return from overseas, an additional 24 months past their current DEROS. They will receive TAIP beginning the first month of their 24-month extension.
Airmen that have a projected assignment to Turkey, but have not yet arrived, may request TAIP, and in turn, will serve a 24-month tour upon arrival in Turkey. They will receive TAIP beginning the date they arrive.  
For eligibility criteria, application procedures and guidance on TAIP, visit myPers. From the dropdown menu, select “Any” and search “Turkey.”turkey 



incentive pay 



DEROS 



USAFE
#### First National Bank of Texarkana v. Eubanks & Wever.

(No. 3519.)

Appeal from Bowie County.

Tolbert & Tolbert, counsel for appellants.

Todd & Hudgins, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 170. *Promissory note; place of payment of; facts held to authorize demand of payment at another place; damages for protest of.*Appellees recovered judgment against appellant for $195 damages for the alleged illegal protest of their promissory note. It appears from the evidence that on September 28, 1886, appellees, at Texarkana, Texas, executed their promissory note for $100, payable to the North Star Iron Works Company on November 1, 1887, at the Citizens’ Bank of Texarkana, Texas. Before said note fell due said Citizens’ Bank had failed, and ceased to do business, and was not doing business when said note fell due, and its former place of business was closed and was unoccupied. When said note fell due appellant presented the same at its own bank for payment, that being the only bank doing business in Texarkana, and caused the same to be protested. Said note was indorsed by Charles Wilkerson. At the time said note fell due, the makers thereof, appellees, did not reside or do business in Texarkana, but resided in another *241town distant twenty-two miles from Texarkana. The indorser, Wilkerson, resided in Texarkana. Appellees’ claim for damages is based upon the proposition that the protest of the note was wrongful and illegal, because it was not presented legally for payment. We are of the opinion that the protest was not wrongful or illegal. The Citizens’ Bank having ceased to do business, and its place sof business being closed, demand of payment could not be made there. For the purpose of such demand appellant bank was the successor of the Citizens’ Bank, there being no other bank in Texarkana. We think the demand and protest were legal. [1 Daniel, Neg. Inst., § 657; 2 Daniel, Neg. Inst., § 1119.] This being our view of the controlling question in the case, and holding, as we do, that appellees have no cause of action for damages against appellant because of said protest, the judgment is reversed and the suit is ordered to be dismissed.

November 12, 1890.

Reversed and dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted

pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Eclipsys Corporation
(the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, R. Andrew Eckert, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 24, 2009



/s/ R. Andrew EckertR. Andrew EckertPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### Adrian GRAY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-5149.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 8, 2010.

Adrian Gray, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(4)(B).

KAHN, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10207 Conference Calendar

TONY RAY CALVIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus SWISHER COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; ADMINISTRATION & STAFF OF SWISHER COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; T. J. MEDART, Warden of Swisher County Detention Center, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:95-CV-86

- - - - - - - - - - August 15, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Tony Ray Calvin (TDCJ # 670672) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Calvin alleged that he was denied adequate medical care after he slipped in an unsafe shower at the Tulia Swisher County Detention Center.No. 97-10207 -2- The district court correctly determined that Calvin’s complaint failed to state a claim under the Eighth Amendment.
See Calvin v. Swisher County Detention Center , No. 2:95-CV-0086 (N.D. Tex.; Feb. 7, 1997). In addition, we note that Calvin’s complaint fails to state a claim under the Fourteenth Amendment.
See Hare v. City of Corinth, Miss. , 74 F.3d 633, 639 (5th Cir. 1996)(en banc). Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal of the complaint.
AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San A ntonio, Texas

February 9, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00003

- CR

Christine RUSSELL, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11

- 0695

- CR Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On December 21, 201 7

, the appellant filed her notice of appeal. On February 8, 2018, the court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal filed a notification of late record, stating that the appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the reporter’s record and that the appellant has failed to file a designation of record.

We, therefore, ORDER the appellant to provide written proof to this court within

fourteen (14) days of the date of this order that either (1) the re porter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. We FURTHER ORDER the appellant to provide written proof

to this court within fourteen (14) days o f the date of this order that she has filed a designation of record with the court reporter, Patricia Wagner.

If the appellant fails to respond within the time provi ded, the appellant’s brief will be due within thirty days from the date of this order, an d the court will only consider those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a

decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of February, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court