alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
"Experts-Independent Auditors" and to the use of our report dated January 7,
2004 in the Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (File No. 333-111366)
and related Prospectus of Claymore Securities Defined Portfolios, Series 165.


                                            /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
                                            ----------------------
                                            GRANT THORNTON LLP


Chicago, Illinois
January 7, 2004
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5688]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              ADJOURNMENT

  Mr. KINGSTON. Madam Speaker, I move that the House do now adjourn.
  The motion was agreed to; accordingly (at 9 o'clock and 19 minutes 
p.m.), the House adjourned until tomorrow, Thursday, June 8, 1995, at 
10 a.m.

                          ____________________
```
#### St. Louis, I. M. & S. R’y Co. v. Henderson Edwards.

(No. 2617.)

Appeal from Bowie County.

Todd & Hudgins, counsel for appellant.

Vaughan & Leary, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 342. *Allegata and probata need not correspond as to immaterial matter; allegation of time not material, when; case staled.*Appellee sued appellant to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him by reason of the negligence of appellant’s employees in starting its passenger train while he was in the act of boarding said train, whereby he was thrown from said train and injured. He recovered judgment for $250 and costs. In his petition he alleged that the injury occurred on the 27th day of December, 1886, and that it was caused by the appellant’s south-bound train. The evidence shewed that appellee was injured at the place and in the manner alleged in the petition, but that such injury probably occurred on a different day than that alleged in the petition, and appellant insists that this constitutes a fatal variance between allegation and proof. *Held:*It '¡is a familiar rule of law that allegation and proof, as to material matters, must correspond, and that the plaintiff must recover, if at all, upon the case made by the pleadings. [1 App. C. C. § 299; 2 App. C. C. § 618.] This rule is restricted to *material*matters. *Time*is not considered generally as forming part of a material issue, and usually one time or day may be alleged and another time or day proved. [Green’s Pl. & Pr. § 424.] Such is ordinarily the rule, even in a prosecution for crime. There are cases, however, in which *time*is material] and in such cases it must be proved as alleged. In this case the precise time of the occurrence which caused the injury is not a material matter. Here the material issue is the injury of appellee caused by the negligent opera*411tion of appellant’s train. If he was so injured, it is not material on what particular day the injury occurred, nor by what particular train it was caused. It was sufficient to prove that the injury occurred about the time alleged in the petition, and that it was caused negligently by one of appellant’s trains.

November 9, 1887.

Affirmed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CAROLYN DUTRIZ,

Appellant,

v.

BRETT C. BAKER

, Appellee.

No. 4D 22

- 923

[ January 26, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fif teenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Cheryl Caracuzzo , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2020

- DR

006215

- XXXX

- NB

.

Carolyn Dutriz, Palm Beach Gardens, pro se.

Brett C. Baker, Englewood, pro se.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, L EVINE and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit
      23.1






Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






The
      Board
      of Directors


RC2
      Corporation:




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
      333-50957, 333-50959, 333-58035, 333-58037, 333-81705, 333-91158 and 333-91236)
      on Form S-8 of RC2 Corporation of our report dated February 28, 2006, with
      respect to the consolidated balance sheets of RC2 Corporation as of December
      31,
      2004 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
      stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
      period ended December 31, 2005, and the related financial statement schedule,
      management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control
      over
      financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which report appears in the
      December 31, 2005, annual report on Form 10-K of RC2 Corporation.






/s/
      KPMG
      LLP




KPMG
      LLP


Chicago,
      Illinois


February
      28, 2006
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7490-S7491]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           ERNEST K. KOPECKY

  Mr. DASCHLE. Mr. President, Ernest K. Kopecky has served as 
construction manager for the Architect of the Capitol and the Congress 
of the United States for 17 years. He began his service in 1978 and 
will retire this year. His tireless and unselfish efforts have 
contributed to the completion of many construction projects in the 
Capitol and in other buildings in the congressional complex and in 
maintaining and preserving the structures that house the legislative 
and judicial branches of the U.S. Government.
  Under Mr. Kopecky's direction, such notable and historically 
significant projects as the restoration of the pedestal for the Statue 
of Freedom that crowns the Dome of the Capitol building and restoration 
of the Bartholdi and Neptune fountains have been successfully 
completed.
  As a dedicated public servant, Ernest Kopecky has set an example for 
others. His genuine concern for quality of work and efficiency of those 
he supervises, his willingness to assist others, and his reputation for 
responsive service have brought great credit to the Office of the 
Architect of the Capitol and reflect positively on his colleagues in 
that office. [[Page S7491]] 
  I congratulate Mr. Kopecky on his distinguished career and wish him 
well in his retirement.

                          ____________________
```
January 13, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EXERGY DEVELOPMENT G ROUP OF IDAHO, LLC A ND JAMES T. CARKULIS , Appellant s

NO. 14

- 14

- 00788

- CV V.

HIGH POWER ENERGY, L LC, BLUE RENEWABLE E NERGY, LLC AND BLACK MOUNTAIN FINAN CIAL, CORP , Appellee s

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on April 8, 2014. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant s , Exergy Development Group of Idaho, LLC and James T. Carkulis.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 5803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2408]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the New 
Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan Yosemite 
National Park, Mariposa and Madera Counties, CA

ACTION: Notice of second extension of public scoping period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (Pub. L. 91-
190) and the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (Pub. L. 90-542), the National 
Park Service reopened public scoping for planning and environmental 
impact analysis for a new Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive 
Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement in Yosemite National 
Park. The original notice of intent to prepare the Draft EIS was 
published in the Federal Register on June 30, 2009; the original public 
scoping period was extended through December 4, 2009 (as noted in the 
Federal Register on August 25, 2009). In deference to continued public 
interest, the scoping period has been further extended for two months.

DATES: Comments must be received by February 4, 2010. If you submitted 
comments previously, you do not need to resubmit them. We will also 
consider any comments that we received between the previous deadline of 
December 4, 2009 and February 4, 2010.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Interested individuals, organizations, and 
agencies are encouraged to provide written comments. To be considered 
any response must be postmarked or transmitted by February 4, 2010. Any 
comments already provided need not be resubmitted. All new responses 
should be addressed to the Superintendent, Attn: Merced River Plan, 
Yosemite National Park, P.O. Box 577, Yosemite National Park, CA 95389, 
or may be faxed to (209) 379-1294. Before including your address, phone 
number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information, you 
should be aware that your entire comment--including your personal 
identifying information--may be made publicly available at any time. 
While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal 
identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we 
will be able to do so.
    To inquire about additional public meetings that may be scheduled, 
or to obtain other current information, please contact the planning 
team at (209) 379-1112, or refer to periodic updates posted at http://www.nps.gov/yose/parkmgmt/newmrp.htm.

Rory D. Westberg,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 2010-2408 Filed 2-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-FY-P
**** **EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**EXCHANGE
      ACT RULE 15D-14(B) AND**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation
      (the ”Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Robert Y. Lee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b)
      and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
      Oxley Act of 2002, that:





i.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





ii.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation and will
      be
      retained by U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation. and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




By:
            /S/ ROBERT Y.
              LEEName:
            Robert Y. LeeTitle:
            Chief Executive OfficerDate:
            August 14,
              2007
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1434 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1434

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   896 Pittsburgh Street in Springdale, Pennsylvania, as the ``Rachel 
                     Carson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RACHEL CARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 896 Pittsburgh Street in Springdale, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Rachel Carson Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Rachel 
Carson Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Aaron Taylor and Betty TAYLOR v. Quinn LEBLANC, Turner Industries Group, Ace American Insurance Company, and State Farm Insurance Company.

No. 2011-CC-0662.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 25, 2011.

In re Ace American Insurance Company; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 66133; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. ll-C-39.

Denied.

VICTORY and CLARK, JJ., would grant.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert
E. Mead, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company. Dated:
March 29, 2004
    
    
    /s/ ROBERT E. MEADRobert E. Mead
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. and will be retained by Silverleaf
Resorts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the following Registration Statements pertaining to the employee stock option plans of United Microelectronics Corporation:



|1. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-102605) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan,
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-126889) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan and the 2004 Employee Stock Option Plan, and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-142809) pertaining to the 2004 Employee Stock Option Plan and 2005 Employee Stock Option Plan
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated April 26, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of United Microelectronics Corporation, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of United Microelectronics Corporation, included in its Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2011.

/s/Ernst & Young

Ernst & Young

Taipei, Taiwan,

Republic of China

April 26, 2012
Exhibit 32.2In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fentura Financial, Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas J. Kelley, Chief Financial Officer of Fentura Financial Inc.certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) the Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.   Dated: August 11, 2006 /s/ Douglas J. Kelley     Douglas J. Kelley  Chief Financial Officer
News United States Air Force
 AF Week in PhotosPublished March 4, 2016
                        
                        By Defense Media Activity
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                This week's photos feature Airmen from around the globe involved in activities supporting expeditionary operations and defending America. This weekly feature showcases the men and women of the Air Force.Week in Photos 



WIP 



AF WIP 



Top Photos
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Appendix A to item 601(c) of Regulation S-K
Commercial and Industrial Companies
Article 5 of Regulation S-X
(in thousands, except per share data)
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.dollars


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                           3,619,782
<SECURITIES>                                     8,590,219
<RECEIVABLES>                                      954,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                           3,333,024
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,722,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,099,736
<BONDS>                                          8,647,030
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         5,512,480
<OTHER-SE>                                     (15,650,437)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,722,334
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,537,450
<CGS>                                            1,236,308
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      953,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (162)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    16,349
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      3,945
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  6,547
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         6,547
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Cadet research project designed to improve flight trainingPublished Nov. 16, 2015
                        
                        By Jennifer Green-Lanchony
                        
                        
                        U.S. Air Force Academy Research Office
                **U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY, Colo. (AFNS) --**
                Cadet researchers at the U.S. Air Force Academy are using the latest technology to improve pilot training.It's a seat.But it's not just any seat. It's a dynamic motion seat, a replica of a pilot seat with electric components that allow it to function like an actual crew seat and imitate the motions a pilot may experience in the air.The seats are the result of a cooperative research and development agreement with ACME-Worldwide Enterprises.The research project also included a welding class for the cadet researchers."It's our job to build the simulator around the chair," said Cadet 1st Class Jordan Read, a systems engineering major. The goal of the cadet researchers is to give pilots a realistic experience inside a simulator, said Ken Levanoski, ACME's business development manager."When something malfunctions, you really don't want (the pilot) to first feel it in a plane," he said.The seat is designed to cue the pilot so they know what is happening to the aircraft, Levanoski said.The results of the project are scheduled to be published in 2016 and will go to training commands across the Air Force and the Air Force Research Laboratory, said Lt. Col. Christopher McClernon, the research director for the Academy's Warfighter Effective Research Center."From those results, we can hopefully build more efficient training systems that are a better use of our taxpayers' money and produce better pilots," he said.McClernon said the results of the project could also benefit the Academy as cadets who participate in the research project are expected to use the seats prior to the Academy's Powered Flight Program."The powered flight class takes cadets who have no flying experience and gives them 10 lessons (in a simulator)," he said. "What we are trying to prove is that we can train cadets to fly solo after eight lessons instead of 10."cadets 



U.S. Air Force Academy