59292 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 186 / Monday, September 27, 2010 / Notices 

powered light posts and street lamps 

that infringe the claimed design of the 

‘732 patent, and whether an industry in 

the United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainants are: 

Duggal Dimensions LLC, 10 West 24th 

Street, New York, NY 10010. 

Duggal Energy Solutions, LLC, 9 West 

20th Street, New York, NY 10011. 

Duggal Visual Solutions, Inc., 10 West 

24th Street, New York, NY 10010. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Gus Power Incorporated, 770 Gana 

Court, Mississauga, Ontario, L5S 1P1 

Canada. 

Efston Science Inc., 3350 Dufferin 

Street, Toronto, Ontario, M6A 3A4 

Canada. 

King Luminaire, Inc., 1153 State Route 

46 North, P.O. Box 266, Jefferson, OH 

44047. 

The StressCrete Group, 840 Walkers 

Lane, Burlington, Ontario, L7R 3X9. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Christopher G. Paulraj, Esq., Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 

20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), 

such responses will be considered by 

the Commission if received not later 

than 20 days after the date of service by 

the Commission of the complaint and 

the notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

Issued: September 21, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24064 Filed 9–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

JOINT BOARD FOR THE 

ENROLLMENT OF ACTUARIES 

Meeting of the Advisory Committee; 

Meeting 

AGENCY: Joint Board for the Enrollment 

of Actuaries. 

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory 

Committee meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Executive Director of the 

Joint Board for the Enrollment of 

Actuaries gives notice of a closed 

meeting of the Advisory Committee on 

Actuarial Examinations. 

DATES: The meeting will be held on 

October 22, 2010, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 

p.m. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

Internal Revenue Service, 230 S. 

Dearborn Street, Room 1720, Chicago, 

IL. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patrick W. McDonough, Executive 

Director of the Joint Board for the 

Enrollment of Actuaries, 202–622–8225. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given that the Advisory 

Committee on Actuarial Examinations 

will meet at Internal Revenue Service, 

230 S. Dearborn Street, Room 1720, 

Chicago, IL on Friday, October 22, 2010, 

from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

The purpose of the meeting is to 

discuss questions that may be 

recommended for inclusion on future 

Joint Board examinations in actuarial 

mathematics, pension law and 

methodology referred to in 29 U.S.C. 

1242(a)(1)(B). 

A determination has been made as 

required by section 10(d) of the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., 

that the subject of the meeting falls 

within the exception to the open 

meeting requirement set forth in Title 5 

U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and that the public 

interest requires that such meeting be 

closed to public participation. 

Dated: September 8, 2010. 

Patrick W. McDonough, 

Executive Director, Joint Board for the 

Enrollment of Actuaries. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24152 Filed 9–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Proposed Consent Decree 

Under the Resource Conseation and 

Recovery Act 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

September 20, 2010, a proposed Consent 

Decree in United States v. High Plains 

Resources, Inc., Civil Action No. 2:09– 

CV–00087–ABJ, was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

District of Wyoming. 

The proposed Consent Decree will 

settle the United States’ claims on 

behalf of the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’) pursuant to 

Section 7003 of the Solid Waste 

Disposal Act, as amended by the 

Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Act of 1976 (‘‘RCRA’’), 42 U.S.C. 6973, 

for civil penalties and permanent 

injunctive relief for failure to comply 

with the Administrative Order, Docket 

No. RCRA–08–226–004, issued by EPA 

to Defendant on September 21, 2006 

(the ‘‘2006 AO’’), and abate an imminent 

and substantial endangerment, 

particularly to wildlife, associated with 

a commercial oilfield waste disposal 

facility known as the Parkman Reservoir 

Disposal Facility (the ‘‘Facility’’) located 

in Johnson County, Wyoming. The 

Consent Decree resolves all claims in 

the Complaint, in return for which 

Defendant will (a) Implement an 

operation and maintenance (‘‘O&M’’) 

plan to prevent endangering migratory 

birds and wildlife while the Facility 

remains open; (b) establish a trust fund 

in the amount of $206,000 to cover the 

cost of the eventual closure of the 

Facility; and (c) pay a civil penalty in 

the amount of $40,000. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

comments relating to the proposed 

Consent Decree for a period of 30 days 

from the date of this publication. 

Comments on the Consent Decree 

should be addressed to the Assistant 

Attorney General, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, and either 

e-mailed to pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O. 

Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611, and 

should refer to United States v. High 

Plains Resources Inc., Civil Action No. 

2:09–CV–00087–ABJ, D.J. Ref. No. 90– 

7–1–09271. Commenters may request an 

opportunity for a public meeting in the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 186 / Monday, September 27, 2010 / Notices 59293 

affected area, in accordance with 

Section 7003(d) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 

6973(d). 

The proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined at the Office of the United 

States Attorney, District of Wyoming, 

J.C. O’Mahoney Federal Building, 2120 

Capitol Avenue, Suite 4002, Cheyenne, 

WY 82001, and at U.S. EPA, Region 8, 

1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO 

80202–1129. During the public 

comment period, the proposed Consent 

Decree may also be examined on the 

following Department of Justice Web 

site: http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

proposed Consent Decree may also be 

obtained by mail from the Consent 

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a 

request to Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax number 

(202) 514–0097, phone number (202) 

514–1547. If requesting a copy by mail 

from the Consent Decree Library, please 

enclose a check in the amount of $11.25 

($0.25 per page reproduction cost) 

payable to the United States Treasury 

or, if requesting by e-mail or fax, 

forward the check in that amount to the 

Consent Decree Library at the address 

stated above. If requesting a copy 

exclusive of appendices, please enclose 

a check in the amount of $6.75 ($0.25 

per page reproduction cost) payable to 

the United States Treasury. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24072 Filed 9–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Office of Justice Programs 

[OMB Number 1121–0283] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Reinstatement, With 

Change, of a Previously Approved 

Collection for Which Approval Has 

Expired; Comments Requested 

ACTION: 60–Day notice of information 

collection under review: State Court 

Organization 2009. 

The Department of Justice, Office of 

Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice 

Statistics, will be submitting the 

following information collection request 

for review and clearance in accordance 

with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995. The proposed information 

collection is published to obtain 

comments from the public and affected 

agencies. Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for ‘‘sixty days’’ until 

November 26, 2010. This process is 

conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 

1320.10. 

If you have additional comments, 

especially on the estimated public 

burden or associated response time, 

suggestions, or need a copy of the 

proposed information collection 

instrument with instructions or 

additional information, please contact: 

Thomas H. Cohen, (202) 514–8344, 

Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of 

Justice Programs, Department of Justice, 

810 Seventh Street, NW., Washington, 

DC 20531 or 

Thomas.H.Cohen@usdoj.gov. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

(1) Type of information collection: 

Reinstatement, with change, of a 

previously approved collection for 

which OMB approval has expired, State 

Court Organization, 2009. 

(2) The title of the form/collection: 

State Court Organization, 2009 or SCO 

2009. 

(3) The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

The form label is SCO–2009, Bureau of 

Justice Statistics, Office of Justice 

Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. 

(4) Affected Public Who Will be Asked 

or Required to Respond, as well as a 

Brief Abstract: State trial and appellate 

courts and state administrative court 

offices. Abstract: State Court 

Organization 2009 will focus on the 

organizational structure of state courts 

throughout the country. Emphasis will 

be placed on collecting information 

pertaining to the number of trial and 

appellate court judges, the selection of 

judicial officers, the governance of the 

judicial branch, the funding and budgets 

of state courts, appellate and trial court 

staffing, the use of juries, and 

sentencing procedures. Moreover, 

information will be collected on the 

utilization of information technology 

systems in state courts. All data 

collected will be accurate as of 

December 2009. 

(5) An Estimate of the Total Number 

of Respondents and the Amount of Time 

Estimated for an Average Respondent to 

Respond: The State Court Organization 

(SCO) data collection forms will be sent 

to each of the nation’s 56 court systems 

(those for the 50 states, the District of 

Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S 

territories including American Samoa, 

Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, and 

the Virgin Islands). The data collection 

instruments will be in the form of 

spreadsheets that will basically mirror 

the electronic and PDF tables produced 

for the SCO report. There are a total of 

62 spreadsheets that the respondents 

will be asked to complete for their 

individual states or courts. Consistent 

with past data collections, recurring 

tables will be populated with data 

previously reported in prior SCO 

publications. Previous SCO surveys, 

along with pretests of the current data 

collection spreadsheets, have shown 

that it should take an estimated half an 

hour for the 56 court systems to review 

and revise each pre-populated 

spreadsheets. Since 38 of the 62 

spreadsheets hail from prior SCO 

surveys, the total burden hours to 

review, revise, and update the prepopulated SCO spreadsheets for each of 

the court systems should be about 19 

hours (38 spreadsheets × half an hour 

per spreadsheet = 19 hours per state or 

U.S. territory). For new spreadsheets, no 

historical data will be available, and the 

data collection forms will be blank. 

Pretests have shown that it should take 

an hour to provide the requested 

information for each data collection 

spreadsheet. Since 24 of the 62 

spreadsheets involve the collection of 

new SCO data, the total burden hours to 

collect the requested data for each court 

systems should be about 24 hours (24 

spreadsheets × one hour per spreadsheet 

= 24 hours per state or U.S. territory). 

Therefore, each of the 56 respondent 

state court systems will require 43 hours 

to complete the SCO data collection 

request. 

(6) An Estimate of the Total Public 

Burden (in hours) Associated with the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES