alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Visualizing threats: A decade of threat modelingPublished July 2, 2016
                        
                        By Senior Airman Matthew Lotz
                        
                        
                        National Air and Space Intelligence Center Public Affairs
                **WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS) --**
                Dynamic explosions, missile launches and air-to-air dogfights are just a few animations the National Air and Space Intelligence Center threat visualization team create to help communicate potential threats in the world.
For the past decade, these types of animations have allowed policymakers at all levels of government to watch a video clip, rather than read a stack of intelligence reports filled with military jargon and technical data.
“Seeing really is believing when it comes to our job,” said Arthur Luke, a contractor from Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp. “We explain important dangers using visual communications.”
Since opening their doors in July 2006, the five-person shop -- a mix of civilians and contractors -- has created more than 250 visualizations for customers throughout the Air Force and intelligence community.
“When an analyst requests a product, we must build off of information in the intelligence analytic report,” said team member Greg Sundra. “It’s the creativity of each individual in this office that builds off that foundation to communicate a critical message which makes our work so special.”
Most of the products have a security classification and cannot be seen by the general public, but that doesn’t stop the team from striving for perfection.
“I always think something can be improved in our work; it’s never good enough,” said team member Justin Weisbarth, a contractor from Ball Aerospace. “Each person on the team has particular skill sets and we use those capabilities to always give the customer greater than what they are asking for.”
The threat visualization team has more than 100 years of combined experience, with most of their backgrounds including productions related to freelance movies, 2-D graphics, logos and video special effects.
According to Steve Vanzant, the NASIC threat visualization team leader, he works with the best of the best and has people he can trust with anything.
“I have the jokester, the straight-man, the calm soul and the button-pusher,” Vanzant said. “The diversity of thought helps the creative process, plus all those characters make it enjoyable to come to work.”
The team’s next project includes working with the Air Force Institute of Technology to allow visualization specialists across the intelligence community to use and share 3-D models, textures and other animation elements.NASIC 



threats 



intelligence 



communication 



technology
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

	

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 

Pursuant to Section 906 

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Tripos, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(b)	information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

 

 

	/s/ John P. McAlister
	John P. McAlister

	Chief Executive Officer

	May 10, 2005

 

	/s/ B. James Rubin
	B. James Rubin

	Chief Financial Officer

	May 10, 2005
#### Terrance L. MOSES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D10-1326.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 20, 2011.

Terrance L. Moses, Stuart, pro se.

No appearance required on behalf of appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion actually sought to challenge the factual basis for his plea. We affirm its denial without prejudice to his filing a timely sworn rule 3.850 motion seeking to withdraw his plea.

*Affirmed.*

GROSS, C.J., POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         2030
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         13553
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    13177
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         2750
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           2842
<LOANS>                                        100167
<ALLOWANCE>                                    835
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141017
<DEPOSITS>                                     123579
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            3211
<LONG-TERM>                                    2331
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1877
<OTHER-SE>                                     10019
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 141017
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                2154
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              354
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               2508
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1430
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1504
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1004
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  42
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             45
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1173
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                402
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     402
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   249
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 8.20
<LOANS-NON>                                    1463
<LOANS-PAST>                                   94
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               935
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  142
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              835
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        835
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1
 Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
  Initial Net Cash Schedule and Net Cash Reporting
  Definitions
 Disclosure Period
 Initial Net Cash Schedule
 Net Cash
 Preferred Stock
 Strategic Transaction
 Required Disclosures Pursuant to SPA Section 3.7(c)(ii)




---



##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1
  Date
    
    Net Cash (in thousands)10/31/2010
    
    $6,66811/30/2010
    
    $6,54912/31/2010
    
    $6,4371/31/2011
    
    $6,2842/28/2011
    
    $6,1823/31/2011
    
    $5,768
#### Blain SLAGLE, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D09-5672.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 15, 2011.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Edgar Lee Elzie, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Brooke Poland and Michael T. Kennett, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the judgment and sentence entered after he was found guilty by a jury of robbery with a deadly weapon and aggravated fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer. Appellant contends that the State’s improper questions during cross-examination and improper arguments during closing arguments constitute fundamental error, necessitating a new trial. The State properly concedes error, and we reverse and remand for a new trial.

While the prosecutor’s questions and comments, standing alone, may not warrant a new trial, the cumulative effect of the prosecutor’s error denied Appellant a fair and impartial trial. *See Brooks v. State,*918 So.2d 181, 202 (Fla.2005) (discussing cumulative error analysis) (quoting *Jackson v. State,*575 So.2d 181, 189 (Fla.1991)).

We decline to address the other issues raised by Appellant.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HAWKES, THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of American Soil  Technology,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the  transitional  nine month period ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Carl  P.  Ranno,  Chief  Executive  Officer,
President, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Carl P. Ranno
-------------------------------
Carl P. Ranno
Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Financial Officer
February 25, 2008
News United States Air Force
 Air Force celebrates 60 years of the KC-135Published Aug. 31, 2016
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Taylor Shelton
                        
                        
                        92nd Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs
                **FAIRCHILD AIR FORCE BASE, Wash. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force celebrated the 60th birthday of the KC-135 Stratotanker Aug. 31. The first Stratotanker flew in August of 1956 and was later delivered to the Air Force in June 1957.The first KC-135 was delivered to the 93rd Air Refueling Squadron, which was assigned at Castle Air Force Base, California, at the time, but has since been relocated to Fairchild AFB.The aircraft was originally used to support bombers of the Strategic Air Command. The midair refueling capabilities allowed fighter missions to spend hours on the front lines, rather than a few minutes, which was usually due to the limited size of fuel tanks in the fighters.“In short order, KC-135s became the backbone of SAC, enabling our bomber force to maintain the peace because of its deterrence capability,” said Jim O’Connell, a 92nd Air Refueling Wing historian.SAC had the KC-135 in service from 1957 to 1992. Following the inactivation the command in 1992, most KC-135s were reassigned to the newly created Air Mobility Command.“Despite being called the ‘B-52s Flying Fuel Station,’ the KC-135 has made an impact locally as well as on the world stage,” O’Connell said. “The first KC-135 to be assigned to Fairchild (AFB) arrived on Feb. 21, 1958, and went on to make its mark on the world by establishing eight world records in September of that year.”A few of the records broken include: most distance covered in a closed-circuit without refueling, highest speed for 2,000 km (1,242 miles) and highest speed for 5,000 km (3,106 miles).In 2001 the first KC-135 with the new Multi-Point Refueling System, which included refueling pods on each wingtip, along with the boom, allowed refueling of any type of aircraft on any mission.Fourteen years later, another upgrade to the aircraft was made, and Fairchild AFB received its first aircraft modified with the Block 45 communications, navigation and surveillance and air traffic management upgrade.Since 1958, the tankers of the 92nd and 141st ARWs have supported everything from aeromedical evacuations, command and control, airlift missions, treaty enforcement and overseas contingency fighter and bomber missions.“The KC-135 and its air refueling mission has been the cornerstone in nearly every contingency and humanitarian operation around the world,” O’Connell said. “As a testament to the incredible maintenance and support teams, it will likely continue to do so for many years to come.”AMC 



KC-135 



60 years 



refueling 



Fairchild AFB
**COURT OF** **APPEALS SANDEE** **BRYAN MARION** **FOURTH COURT** **OF APPEALS** **DISTRICT KEITH** **E. HOTTLE** **CLERK CHIEF** **JUSTICE CADENA-REEVES** **JUSTICE CENTER** **OF COURT** **KAREN ANGELINI** **300 DOLOROSA,** **SUITE 3200** **MAR1ALYN BARNARD** **SAN ANTONIO,** **TEXAS 7820S-3037** **TELEPHONE REBECA** **C. MARTINEZ** **WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX (210)335-2635** **PATRICIA O.** **ALVAREZ LUZ** **ELENA D.** **CHAPA FACSIMILE** **NO. JASON** **PULLIAM (210)335-2762** **JUSTICES April** **27, 2015** 

### David**L. Reuthinger,** **Jr. Nathan** **H. Chu** **Webb County** **District Attorney's** **Office 5517 McPherson,** **Suite 14** **1110 Victoria,** **Suite 401** **Laredo, TX** **78041 Laredo,** **TX 78040** **Oscar A.** **Vela, Jr.** **Law Offices** **of Oscar** **A. Vela,** **Jr. 5517** **McPherson Road,** **Ste. 14** **Laredo, Texas 78041** 

### RE:**Court of** **Appeals Numbers:** **04-14-00716-CR 04-14-00717-CR** **Trial Court** **Case Number:** **2014-CRM-0003 89-D2** 

### Styles:**Francisco Javie** **Azuara, Jr.** **and Alfonso** **Carlos Tamez** **v. The** **State of** **Texas Dear** **Counsel:**

### Enclosed**please find** **the order** **which the** **Honorable Court** **of Appeals** **has issued** **in reference** **to the** **above styled** **and numbered** **cause.**

### If**you should** **have any** **questions, please** **do not** **hesitate to** **contact me.** **Very truly** **yours, KEITH** **E. HOTTLE,** **CLERK Margaret/E.** **Adams Legal** **Assistant, Fourth** **Court of** **Appeals 210.335.3854**
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1366 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1366

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the alternative 
                      minimum tax on individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2007

Mr. English of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
 Sessions, Mr. Kuhl of New York, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Davis of Kentucky, 
   Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Gary G. Miller of 
California, Mr. Jordan of Ohio, Mr. Shays, Mr. Simpson, Mrs. Musgrave, 
Mr. Conaway, Mr. Manzullo, and Mr. Doolittle) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the alternative 
                      minimum tax on individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Individual AMT Repeal Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INDIVIDUAL ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX.

    (a) In General.--Section 55(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to alternative minimum tax imposed) is amended by adding at 
the end the following new flush sentence:
``Except in the case of a corporation, no tax shall be imposed by this 
section for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2006, and the 
tentative minimum tax of any taxpayer other than a corporation for any 
such taxable year shall be zero for purposes of this title.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006.
                                 <all>
```
#### Charlie TAYLOR, Appellant v. Emmitt L. SPARKMAN, et al., Appellees.

No. 2010-CP-00648-COA.

Court of Appeals of Mississippi.

July 19, 2011.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 17, 2012.

Charlie Taylor, appellant, pro se.

Office of the Attorney General by R. Stewart Smith Jr., attorney for appellees.

Before LEE, C.J., MYERS and MAXWELL, JJ.

LEE, C.J.,

for the Court:

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 1. Charlie Taylor is an inmate incarcerated within the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC). Taylor filed a motion to show cause in the Sunflower County Circuit Court seeking judicial review of several decisions of the Administrative Remedy Program (ARP). Taylor had filed several complaints in the MDOC’s ARP, all of which were concluded via a Third Step Response. These Third Step Response forms indicated that Taylor had thirty days in which to seek judicial review. Taylor received his latest response form on November 24, 2009. According to Taylor, he filed his motion to show cause within thirty days after receiving this latest response form, and it also appears that Taylor failed to pay the required filing fee. The record indicates that Taylor’s motion to show cause was filed on February 5, 2010, well after the thirty days had elapsed.

¶ 2. The trial court determined that Taylor had failed to file his request for judicial review within the thirty days as required by Mississippi Code Annotated section 47-5-807 (Rev.2004). The trial court then dismissed Taylor’s motion as time-barred.

DISCUSSION

¶ 3. Pursuant to section 47-5-807, Taylor’s right to appeal a final decision of the MDOC under ARP must be asserted within thirty days after receipt of the final decision. Taylor failed to do so. “Filing within the statutorily-mandated time is jurisdictional.” *Stanley v. Turner,*846 So.2d 279, 282 (1111) (Miss.Ct.App.2003). We conclude that Taylor’s motion for relief was not timely filed, and the trial court did not have jurisdiction. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s dismissal.

¶ 4. THE JUDGMENT OF THE SUNFLOWER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT IS AFFIRMED. ALL COSTS OF THIS APPEAL ARE ASSESSED TO THE APPELLANT.

IRVING AND GRIFFIS, P.JJ., MYERS, BARNES, ISHEE, ROBERTS, CARLTON, MAXWELL AND RUSSELL, JJ., CONCUR.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Miguel COWLES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-7363.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 2001.

Decided Jan. 17, 2001.

Michael Miguel Cowles, pro se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

*256PER CURIAM.

Michael Miguel Cowles seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. Cowles,*Nos. CR-98-9; CA-00-87-4 (E.D.Va. Sept. 8, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 101 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 101

Relating to the disapproval of obligations under the Emergency Economic 
                       Stabilization Act of 2008.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2008

 Ms. Foxx (for herself, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Poe, Mr. Issa, Mr. Latta, Mr. 
Paul, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Flake, Mr. Conaway, and Mr. McCaul 
of Texas) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Relating to the disapproval of obligations under the Emergency Economic 
                       Stabilization Act of 2008.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
obligation of any amount exceeding the amounts obligated as described 
in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 115(a) of the Emergency Economic 
Stabilization Act of 2008.
                                 <all>
```
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Football legend Herschel Walker visits Airmen, wounded warriors

              - Published  Oct. 25, 2013
              -                             By Nathan Simmons                                                    
              - 59th Medical Wing Public Affairs

**JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, Texas (AFNS) --  **
Heisman Trophy winner and former NFL running back Herschel Walker visited Airmen from the Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center Oct. 23, here. Walker spoke to more than 200 Airmen about his life as a boy, leading up to his college and NFL days. He also discussed the challenges he faced with Dissociative Identity Disorder, or DID, more commonly known as multiple personality disorder. Walker recounted reading journals he kept from his childhood and being taken aback by the rage and anger that came across in some of his entries. After deciding to seek help, he saw firsthand the negativity surrounding mental health issues. "People think that being in the hospital is a sign of weakness," Walker said. "But the Herschel Walker in the hospital is the same Herschel Walker who did all these great things." Members of the 59th Medical Wing Patient Squadron, a unit composed of wounded, ill and injured service members, attended a luncheon with Walker and were able to share some of their experiences."To actually get a one-on-one conversation with Herschel, instead of hearing him speak to everyone at once made it really special," said Staff Sgt. Daniel Crane, who is assigned to the 59th Patient Squadron. "You could tell he cared about us," 

Walker then visited patients at the WHASC's Intensive Outpatient Program, which assists members develop coping skills to better manage emotional and behavioral life challenges. He spoke openly once more about his prior issues with DID, and his decision to face himself. Walker said that only once he faced his problems, was he able to cope and begin living a happier life."When young people get to meet adults who have struggled with mental health issues, and have survived and thrived, it really helps destigmatize seeking help," said Capt. Liz Copeland, the 59th Mental Health Element chief . 

As part of the DOD Patriot Support Program, Walker travels to military installations throughout the country to share his story, and encourage service members to seek treatment for mental health and substance abuse issues. He has visited more than 65 installations in the past five years. 

wounded warriorsTexasNFL