alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
SUPERGEN, INC.  MARCH 31, 1997 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       9,931,782
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                   146,800
<INVENTORY>                                  1,579,905
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,411,844
<PP&E>                                       1,045,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                 245,906
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,666,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,872,198
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    40,136,551
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,666,871
<SALES>                                        424,961
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               424,961
<CGS>                                          326,248
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,260,528
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,022,165)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,022,165)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,022,165)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Francisco Chamul v. Amerisure Mutual Ins. Co.

Appellate case number: 01-14-00508-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-14219

Trial court: 190th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: February 24, 2016

Party filing motion: Appellee

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Terry Jennings, Laura Higley, and Harvey Brown

Date: March 8, 2016
422 A.2d 1173

#### Nowlin, Appellant, v. Wayman.

Argued April 10, 1979.

Clencie L. Cotton, for appellant; W. Arch Irvin, Jr., for appellee.

Before VAN der VOORT, SPAETH and WATKINS, JJ.

Order affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001034237
<NAME>                                         AeroCentury IV, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,002,870
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  60,670
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,063,540
<PP&E>                                         3,613,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                 242,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,919,910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,170
<BONDS>                                        4,869,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       243,420
<OTHER-SE>                                     (305,680)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,919,910
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               715,000
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               411,530
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             486,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (183,430)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (184,230)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (184,230)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.76)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 12
 LAND OLAKES, INC.
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Year Ended December 31,2008
    
    2007
    
    2006
    
    2005
    
    2004Earnings:Earnings before income taxes and discontinued operations
    
    $
    174,128
    
    
    $
    197,260
    
    
    $
    72,317
    
    
    $
    137,450
    
    
    $
    33,787(Less): Equity in earnings of affiliated
companies
    
    
    (34,972
    )
    
    
    (68,183
    )
    
    
    (13,674
    )
    
    
    (41,343
    )
    
    
    (62,204
    )Add: Minority interest in earnings
of subsidiaries
    
    
    16,128
    
    
    
    1,469
    
    
    
    1,449
    
    
    
    1,354
    
    
    
    1,648Add: Distributed income of equity investees
    
    
    45,142
    
    
    
    33,699
    
    
    
    4,736
    
    
    
    35,250
    
    
    
    47,846Add: Fixed Charges (1)
    
    
    95,829
    
    
    
    89,239
    
    
    
    89,080
    
    
    
    105,885
    
    
    
    105,529(Less): Capitalized interest
    
    
    (1,559
    )
    
    
    (945
    )
    
    
    (95
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (68
    )Earnings available to cover fixed charges
    
    $
    294,696
    
    
    $
    252,539
    
    
    $
    153,813
    
    
    $
    238,596
    
    
    $
    126,538Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    3.1
    
    
    
    2.8
    
    
    
    1.7
    
    
    
    2.3
    
    
    
    1.2
 
 (1)
    
    Fixed charges consist of the following: Year Ended December 31,2008
    
    2007
    
    2006
    
    2005
    
    2004Interest expense, gross
    
    $
    73,857
    
    
    $
    70,028
    
    
    $
    70,666
    
    
    $
    88,194
    
    
    $
    88,356Rentals (interest factor)
    
    
    21,972
    
    
    
    19,211
    
    
    
    18,414
    
    
    
    17,691
    
    
    
    17,173Total fixed charges
    
    $
    95,829
    
    
    $
    89,239
    
    
    $
    89,080
    
    
    $
    105,885
    
    
    $
    105,529
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 186 (Monday, September 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59282-59283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24041]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5415-N-17]


Notice of Availability: Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 
Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Continuum of Care (CoC) Homeless Assistance 
Program

AGENCY: Office of the Chief of the Human Capital Officer, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD announces the availability on its Web site of the 
applicant information, deadline information, and other requirements for 
the Continuum of Care (CoC) Homeless Assistance Program NOFA for 
FY2010. Approximately $1.68 billion is made available through this 
NOFA, through Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117, 
approved December 16, 2009). Carried over or recaptured funds from 
previous fiscal years, if available, may be added to this amount. 
Applicants may obtain copies of HUD's FY2010 CoC NOFA and the HUD's 
Fiscal Year 2010 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) Policy 
Requirements and General Section to HUD's FY2009 NOFAs for 
Discretionary Programs (General Section) at http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm. Applicants will be required to complete and 
submit their applications in e-snaps at http://www.hud.gov/esnaps. This 
system is not part of Grants.gov. Applicants are strongly encouraged to 
carefully review application submission requirements contained in the 
FY2010 CoC NOFA.
    The Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) numbers for the 
CoC Homeless Assistance Program are: 14.235, Supportive Housing Program 
(SHP); 14.238, Shelter Plus Care (S+C) and 14.249, Section 8 Moderate 
Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy (SRO).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding specific program 
requirements should be directed to the agency contact identified in the 
program NOFA. Questions regarding the 2010 General Section should be 
directed to the Office of Departmental Grants Management and Oversight 
at 202-708-0667 (this is not a toll-free number) or the NOFA 
Information Center at 1-800-HUD-8929 (toll-free). Persons with hearing 
or speech impairments may access these numbers via TTY by calling the 
Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339.


[[Page 59283]]


    Dated: September 20, 2010.
Barbara S. Dorf,
Director, Office of Departmental Grants, Management and Oversight, 
Office of the Chief of the Human Capital Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-24041 Filed 9-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David E. Ullman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| |  | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                   
| |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
| |  |     | the Company.                                                                                                                           
|

|September 7, 2006 |  | /s/ DAVID E. ULLMAN    
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|                  |  |                        
|                  |  | David E. Ullman        
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer

---
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

ERRATA

July 7, 2005 

Appeal No. 04-1191 and 04-1192 

Rasmusson v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.

Decided: June 27, 2005 Precedential Opinion 

Change the opinion as follows: 

• On page 7, line 17, replace “628 F.2d 1327, 1332 (Fed. Cir. 1980)” with “628 

F.2d 1322, 1332 (CCPA 1980)”
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Form S-8 Nos. 333-139977, 333-137872 and 333-143495 and Form S-3Nos. 333-140074 and 333-136335) of Force Protection, Inc. and in therelated Prospectuses of our reports dated March 17, 2007, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements and schedule of ForceProtection, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting of Force Protection, Inc., included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 
| /s/ Jaspers + Hall, PC |   |
|------------------------|--------|
| Denver, Colorado       |
| June 27, 2007     |

 

 

----
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board
of Directors


RC2
Corporation:





Weconsent to the incorporation by reference
in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-50959, 333-58037,
333-81705, 333-91158, 333-91236, 333-133238, and 333-157765) and Form S-3 (No.
333-156071) of RC2 Corporation of our reports dated March 1, 2010, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of RC2 Corporation and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2008 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the related financial statement
schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 annual
report on Form 10-K of RC2 Corporation.








/s/ KPMG
LLP





Chicago,
Illinois


March 1,
2010
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


EXCHANGE
ACT RULE 15D-14(B) AND


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of US Dry Cleaning Corporation
(the ”Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Robert Y. Lee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002, that:





i.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





ii.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to US Dry Cleaning Corporation and will be
retained by US Dry Cleaning Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








By:
            /S/ ROBERT Y. LEEName:
            Robert
      Y. LeeTitle:
            Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
            August
      14, 2008
Unassociated Document


    
      xhibit
10.2 Marc Walther Employment Agreement


      


      
        
          
          

        

        
          
          

          
            

          

        

        
          
          

        

      

      


      


      
        
          
          

        

        
          
          

          
            

          

        

        
          
          

        

      

      


      


      
        
          
          

        

        
          
          

          
            

          

        

        
          
          

        

      

      


      


      
        
          
          

        

        
          
          

          
            

          

        

        
          
          

        

      

      


      


      
        
          
          

        

        
          
          

          
            

          

        

        
          
          

        

      

      


      


      
        
          
          

        

        
          
          

          
            

          

        

        
          
          

        

      

      


      


      
        
          
          

        

        
          
          

          
            

          

        

        
          
          

        

      

      



      


      


      


      


      


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth.

      


      


      


      


      
        	 
      	
                EXECUTIVE:
      Marc A. Walther

              
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                /s/
      Marc A. Walther

              
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                COMPANY:
      HydroGenetics, Inc.

              
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                /s/
      Marc A. Walther

              
	 
      	
                Name:  Marc
      A. Walther

              
	 
      	
                Title:
      Chief Executive Officer
#### Dexter RENTZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D10-1306.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

July 1, 2011.

Robert L. Sirianni, Jr., and Paetra T. Brownlee of Brownstone, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the final judgment revoking his probation. Because the State relied exclusively on hearsay evidence to prove the violations of conditions one and three, and it failed to prove a willful violation of condition two, we reverse.

Appellant was accused of a violation of conditions one and three based on the factual allegation that he changed his residence without permission and falsely reported his residence to his probation officer. He denied that he had moved, maintaining that he still resided with his cousin at the approved residence. The State attempted to prove the violation through the testimony of the probation officer. However, his knowledge was based solely on hearsay without any independent corroboration. Although the trial court was correct in admitting the evidence over a hearsay objection, it erred in finding that this evidence was sufficient, standing alone, to support the finding that Appellant violated these conditions.

The trial court also erred in concluding that Appellant violated condition two of his probation for failing to pay costs and restitution because the trial court made no finding (and the evidence was lacking) that Appellant willfully failed to pay. *Limbaugh v. State,*16 So.3d 954 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). On remand, the trial court should reinstate the probation or *756impose non-prison sanctions pursuant to section 948.06(5), Florida Statutes (2010).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER, C.J., TORPY and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
#### Ft. W. & D. C. R’y Co. v. C. C. Taliaferro.

(No. 7186.)

Appeal from Hardeman County.

Browning & Madden, counsel for appellant.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

Davidson, J.

§ 312. *Contributory negligence; party chargeable with not entitled to damages.*Appellee filed this suit in the justice’s court, claiming actual and exemplary damages caused by appellant, through its lawful agents and employees, carelessly and negligently operating its engine, and leaving same upon a public crossing, thereby causing his team to run away and injure him and one of his horses. The evidence discloses that appellee and one Burton were approaching the railroad track in the town of Quanah, when appellant’s engine came along its track and stopped partially across the road-crossing. In attempting to cross the railroad track in front of this engine, appellee’s horses became frightened at the engine, shied to one side, and ran away, and w7hile so running appellee fell out of the wagon and was slightly injured. It is further shown by the evidence that sufficient room was left at the crossing for the wagon to pass the engine. In other respects the testimony is in substance the same as in the case of Appellant v. Burton, *ante,*p. 292. It is contended by appellant that a recovery cannot be had because appellee was guilty of contributory negligence. We are of opinion that this contention is correct. *546Where one person seeks to recover of another because of the latter’s negligence, it is a sufficient defense and answer to show that the complaining party was guilty of such negligence as contributed to the injury. To hold otherwise would sanction the rule that a party could profit by his own wrong. “It is the duty of a person to use ordinary care and reasonable means to prevent an injury, and the consequences of it, and he can only recover damages for such losses as could not, by such care and means, be avoided; and if a party in any material manner contributed to the injury received, he cannot recover for such losses as result from his own and another’s fault.” [White *&*W. Cond. Rep., §§ 187, 117, 860; 2 Willson, Civil Cas., § 138; Railroad *Co.*v. Le Grierse, 51 Tex. 202; 6 Wait, Act. & Def., p. 583.] As disclosed by the record, we are of opinion the facts do not support the judgment; wherefore it is reversed and the cause remanded.

May 11, 1892.

Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobeTel Communications Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Thomas Y. Jimenez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Thomas Y. Jimenez
Chief Financial Officer
August 11, 2005

                                  End of Filing