alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors
Animas Corporation: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-116640) of Animas Corporation of our report dated March 25, 2005, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Animas Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and
2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Animas Corporation. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 25, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1515 Engrossed in House (EH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1515

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to treat 
    certain communities as metropolitan cities for purposes of the 
               community development block grant program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METROPOLITAN CITIES.

    Paragraph (4) of section 102(a) of the Housing and Community 
Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5302) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new sentence: ``Notwithstanding any other provision 
of this paragraph, with respect to any fiscal year beginning after the 
date of the enactment of this sentence, the cities of Alton and Granite 
City, Illinois, shall be considered metropolitan cities for purposes of 
this title.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 17, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1515

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to treat 
    certain communities as metropolitan cities for purposes of the 
               community development block grant program.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-25-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              DEC-26-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-25-1997
<CASH>                                            4,358
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    88,841
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                     110,477
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                209,382
<PP&E>                                          177,217
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  432,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            99,539
<BONDS>                                           3,456
<COMMON>                                        293,184
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    432,129
<SALES>                                         490,585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                490,585
<CGS>                                           313,527
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   435,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3,362
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  48,905
<INCOME-TAX>                                     16,361
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              32,544
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     32,544
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      1.68





</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 4.5

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

                                                                 $142,910.00 USD

                                                            Date:  June 11, 2003

For  value  received, the undersigned, jointly and severally (if more than one),
promises  to  pay  on  demand  to  the  order of Thor Capital Group, Inc. or its
nominees,  the  sum  of  $142,910.oo  USD, with 0% interest to be applied to the
amount.

ROLLTECH, INC.

/s/ Michael Scheglov, President and CEO
---------------------------------------
Michael Scheglov, President and CEO


<PAGE>
No. 87-894.

#### Slyper et al. *v.*Meese, Attorney General, et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White,

dissenting.

This case presents the issue whether the decision of the United States Information Agency (USIA) to recommend against waiver of the requirement that a foreign doctor in this country for graduate medical training return to his or her foreign residence for two years prior to applying for permanent residence status here is subject to judicial review for abuse of discretion. See 8 U. S. C. § 1182(e) (1982 ed., Supp. IV). A waiver from the 2-year foreign residence requirement can be obtained on “hardship” grounds, one condition for which is that the Director of the USIA make a favorable recommendation concerning the waiver. The Court of Appeals held that because neither the relevant statute nor implementing regulation provided a standard against which to assess the Director’s exercise of discretion, the decision was one committed to the agency’s discretion by law and accordingly not reviewable under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U. S. C. § 701(a)(2). 264 U. S. App. D. C. 170, 172-173, 827 F. 2d 821, 823-824 (1987). In so holding, the court reached the same conclusion as the Second and Ninth Circuits, *Dina*v. *Attorney General,*793 F. 2d 473, 476 (CA2 1986) *(per curiam); Abdelhamid*v. *Ilchert,*774 F. 2d 1447, 1449-1450 (CA9 1985), and rejected the contrary conclusion of the Third Circuit, *Chong*v. *Director, USIA,*821 F. 2d 171, 176 (1987). I would grant certiorari to resolve the conflict among the Circuits over this question of federal law.
#### EWING TOWNSHIP v. WILBUR H. MATHESIUS AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY.

March 27, 1984.

Petition for certification denied. (See 193 *N.J.Super.*65 (1984))
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Sinnott,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Dated:  March
      11, 2008
              
              /s/ ROBERT M.
      SINNOTTRobert
      M. SinnottChief
      Financial Officer
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. and will be retained by Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            3122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10202
<ALLOWANCES>                                       102
<INVENTORY>                                       3639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 20416
<PP&E>                                           21943
<DEPRECIATION>                                    8701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   40938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10051
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       9149
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                       14773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     40938
<SALES>                                          10474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 10474
<CGS>                                             1938
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1938
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 12183
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3384)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3384)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3563)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.03)


</TABLE>
#### Tompkins Machine & Implement Co. v. C. F. Schmidt.

(No. 6302.)

Error from Dallas County.

McCormick &' Spence, counsel for plaintiff in error.

John Bookhout, counsel for defendant in error.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

*195June 10, 1890.

§ 134. *Garnishment; service of writ of on incorporated company; sheriff’s return of service held insufficient to authorize judgment by default.*This writ of error is prosecuted from a judgment by default recovered by defendant in ei’ror against plaintiff in error as a garnishee. Plaintiff in error is an incorporated company under the laws of this state. The return of the sheriff of service of the writ of garnishment is as follows: “ Game to hand September 3, 1888, and executed same day received, at 10:30 o’clock A. M., by delivering to Geo. E. Bennett, manager of the Tompkins Mach. & Imp. Co., a true copy of this writ.”. This return of service did not authorize the judgment by default. It does not show that service of the writ was made ufpon plaintiff in error ill any of the modes prescribed by the statute. It cannot be assumed or presumed that the “manager” of said company was either the president, secretary, treasurer or local agent of said company. [Sayles’ Civil St., art. 1223.] In the case of a foreign corporation, service of process may'be had upon the “general manager” of such corporation, but plaintiff in error is not a foreign, but a domestic, corporation. [Id., art. 1223a.]

Reversed and remanded.
#### ALBERT E. WEISS, JR., ET AL. *v.*MARGARET M. WEISS ET AL.

(AC 22720)

Laveiy, C. J., and Foti and West, Js.

Argued February 25

officially released April 8, 2003

Per Curiam.

There is no standing.

The appeal is dismissed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5577]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Will the gentleman from Colorado [Mr. 
Skaggs], please come forward and lead the House in the Pledge of 
Allegiance.
  Mr. SKAGGS led the Pledge of Allegiance as follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United 
     States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, 
     one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice 
     for all.

                          ____________________
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Nos. DA 21-0620

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

STEVEN JAMES CLIFTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

_______________________________________________________________

ORDER

_______________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension 

of time, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 12, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve its Reply to the Appellee’s Response in this case.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 28 2023

04/28/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0620
EXHIBIT 31.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 
 I, Gregg D. Adzema, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Summit Properties Inc., the general partner of Summit Properties Partnership, L.P., certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Summit Properties Partnership, L.P.;2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)

[Omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and5.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date:

March 12, 2004/S/ Gregg D. AdzemaName:

Gregg D. AdzemaTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Michael Durski,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis amended annual report of Force Protection, Inc.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date:  July 12, 2007 |
|----------------------|
| By:                  | /s/ MICHAEL DURSKI |   |
|                 | Michael Durski |
|                 | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. August WILLIAMS.

No. 2010-KD-2441.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 17, 2010.

In re Williams, August; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedi*10al Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 202-536.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J., would grant and docket.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

I, Richard H. Hawkins, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Deltagen, Inc.; 

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annualreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c)  Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a)  All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialdata and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internalcontrols subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winston Hotels, Inc.
(the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  Report), I,
Joseph V. Green, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|             |  |                                         | 
|------------ |  | --------------------------------------- | 
|             |  | /s/ Joseph V. Green                    
|             |  |                                        
|Name:
Title: |  | Joseph V. Green
Chief Financial Officer
|             |  |                                        
|Date:        |  | November 12, 2003