alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from MovieFone,
Inc.'s condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three
months ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,127,730
<SECURITIES>                                 3,001,280
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,871,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     81,345
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,551,924
<PP&E>                                       5,518,856
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,844,839
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,509,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,776,996
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       128,060
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,732,555
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,509,551
<SALES>                                         89,089
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,035,856
<CGS>                                           74,750
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  941,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (959,437)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (959,437)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (959,437)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND THE 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 
1997 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             444
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (481)
<INVENTORY>                                     19,585
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,559
<PP&E>                                          19,086
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (6,125)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,837
<BONDS>                                          3,056
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,545
<SALES>                                         92,079
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,627
<CGS>                                           64,758
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,149
<INCOME-TAX>                                       426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                723
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       723
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
<FN>
<F1>PROVISION FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS AND INVENTORY PROVISION INCLUDED IN TOTAL
COSTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Jerry L. BUTLER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-0356.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re Butler, Jerry L.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 04-1545; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 10-KH-1042,10-KH-783.

Denied.
#### Keith SULLIVAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 3D09-1279, 3D09-1281.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 2, 2011.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Forrest L. Andrews, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, LAGOA and EMAS, JJ.

EMAS, J.

Upon motion of Appellant, and with the agreement of the State, we acknowledge that the trial court properly has entered corrected judgments and sentences which conform to the oral pronouncement. This being the sole issue raised by Appellant, the appeal is hereby dismissed as moot.
#### In the Interest of A.N., a child. R.N., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Family Services, Appellee.

No. 2D10-4126.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 25, 2011.

Scott L. Robbins, Tampa, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David J. Lopez, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

VILLANO!, Judge.

R.N., the father of A.N., challenges the circuit court’s orders finding A.N. dependent and placing her in a permanent guardianship with her stepfather. Because competent, substantial evidence supported the order finding A.N. dependent, we affirm that order without further discussion.

We also affirm the circuit court’s order placing A.N. in a permanent guardianship with her stepfather. *See*§ 39.6221, Fla. Stat. (2009). However, over R.N.’s objection, the circuit court failed to “[sjpecify the frequency and nature of visitation or contact between” R.N. and his daughter in the guardianship order as required by section 39.6221(2)(c). Instead, the court ordered that R.N. and the permanent guardian develop and agree on a visitation and contact schedule. This resolution was not only unworkable given the animosity between R.N. and the permanent guardian, but also violated the clear mandate of section 39.6221(2)(c). Therefore, we reverse *686the guardianship order on this basis alone and remand for the court to enter an amended order that sets forth a visitation and contact schedule between R.N. and A.N.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CASANUEVA., C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., Concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, NORMAN E. DRAPEAU, JR., certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of MRO Software, Inc., a
Massachusetts Corporation;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: February 11, 2005



By: /s/ Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.
----------------------------------------
Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gary A. Corless, President and Chief
Executive Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended January 1, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Gary A. Corless                  
|Gary A. Corless                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer

February 10, 2010
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00379

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A .T.L. , a Child

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- PA

- 00966

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order of Termination

is AFFIRMED.

No costs of appeal are assessed because appellant is indigent.

SIGNED October 28, 2015.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
#### STATE ex rel. Donald HENSLEY v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2009-KH-1857.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 4, 2011.

In re Hensley, Donald; —Plaintiff; Applying for Motion to Enforce this Court’s Order, dated August 14, 2009; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. J, No. 02-3060.

Denied. Moot. The district court has acted.
#### Ferdinand TRUXILLO, Jr. v. Albert BOSSIER, as an Executive Officer of Avondale Industries, Inc., et al.

No. 2011-CC-1020.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 2011.

In re Truxillo Jr., Ferdinand; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. I, No. 2010-10951; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-C-0651.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 151 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 151

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to ensure that projects funded 
    through the National Institutes of Health comply with wage rate 
 requirements commonly referred to as the ``Davis-Bacon Act'', and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
 the Committee on Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to ensure that projects funded 
    through the National Institutes of Health comply with wage rate 
 requirements commonly referred to as the ``Davis-Bacon Act'', and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAGE RATE REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO PROJECTS FUNDED THROUGH 
              NIH.

    Part H of title IV of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 289 
et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 498D. WAGE RATE REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO PROJECTS FUNDED 
              THROUGH NIH.

    ``The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall require that 
each entity that applies to the National Institutes of Health or any 
component thereof for a loan, loan guarantee, grant, contract, or 
cooperative agreement for any project shall include in its application 
reasonable assurance that all laborers and mechanics employed by 
contractors or subcontractors in the performance of construction or 
modernization on the project will be paid wages at rates not less than 
those prevailing on similar work in the locality as determined by the 
Secretary of Labor in accordance with subchapter IV of chapter 31 of 
part A of subtitle II of title 40, United States Code (commonly 
referred to as the `Davis-Bacon Act').''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Fisher Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Benjamin W. Tucker Jr., Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 25, 2005



/s/ Benjamin W. Tucker Jr.Benjamin W. Tucker Jr.Acting President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Michael W. TURNER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D10-6074.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 6, 2010.

Michael W. Turner, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. *See Baker v. State,*878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1199 

AN ACT 

To extend the grant program for drug-endangered children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1199 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drug Endangered 

3 Children Act of 2007’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DRUG-ENDANGERED CHILDREN GRANT PROGRAM 

5 EXTENDED. 

6 Section 755(c) of the USA PATRIOT Improvement 

7 and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 3797cc–2(c)) 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2006 and 2007’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2008 and 2009’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1199 

AN ACT 

To extend the grant program for drug-endangered 

children.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated October 2,
2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Blue
Rhino Corporation included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
July 31, 2001, in the following:


     - Form S-8 (No. 333-80909) pertaining to the Company's Amended and Restated
       Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors;

     - Form S-8 (No. 333-60366) pertaining to the Company's Amended and Restated
       Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended;

     - Form S-8 (No. 333-80907) pertaining to the Company's 1994 Stock Incentive
       Plan;

     - Form S-8 (No. 333-80911) pertaining to the Company's 1998 Stock Incentive
       Plan;

     - Form S-8 (No. 333-60368) pertaining to the Company's 1998 Stock Incentive
       Plan, as amended; and

     - Form S-8 (No. 333-94039) pertaining to the Company's Employee Stock
       Purchase Plan.



                                              /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
October 9, 2001
#### RIVERBEND CAPITAL, LLC v. Larry Van JACKSON, Jr., et al.

No. 2011-CC-1910.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Riverbend Capital LLC; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. I, No. 2008-11997; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-C-0719.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Matthew J. JAMES, Jr. Matthew James, Jr. v. Latasha Y. Davis.

No. 2011-CJ-0425.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 8, 2011.

In re James Jr., Matthew J.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court Div. A, Nos. 17,320, 18,462, 20001260; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 45,955-JAC, 45,956-JAC, 45,957-JAC.

Not considered. Not timely filed. See Supreme Court Rule X, Section 5(a) and Section 5(d).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-31021 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTHONY BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CR-135-1

-------------------- May 18, 2001 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Anthony Brown appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction to count 3 of his indictment, possession with intent to distribute one quarter ounce of cocaine base. Brown argues that the district court committed plain error by imposing an illegal five year term of supervised release for his conviction on count 3 because the pre-sentence investigation report stated that subsequent analysis revealed that Brown possessed only 1.8 grams of cocaine base in relation to count 3.No. 00-31021 -2- Brown did not object to the sentence in the district court. Therefore, the claim is reviewed under the plain error standard. See United States v. Cartwright , 6 F.3d 294, 300 (5th Cir. 1993). The error is clear. However, the error does not seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings because a reduction of Brown’s term of supervised release on count 3 would not affect the overall term of his supervised release, Brown fails to show any meaningful benefit that he would receive from a correction of the error, and correction of the error does not call any of Brown’s convictions into question. See United States v. Meshack , 225 F.3d 556, 577 (5th Cir. 2000), amended on reh’g , ___ F.3d ___, No. 99-50669, 2001 WL 224656, at *1 (5th Cir. Mar. 7, 2001), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 834 (2001). Therefore, there was no plain error. See United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 732 (1993); United States v. Fletcher , 121 F.3d 187, 192 (5th Cir. 1997). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5388]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    MORE ON THE STUDENT LOAN PROGRAM

  (Ms. JACKSON-LEE asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Ms. JACKSON-LEE. Mr. Speaker, I spent some time in the district 
talking to and working with students who simply wanted an opportunity 
to be educated.
  I rise this morning to read a letter just received from Eric Lee 
Nickell, a Houston constituent of mine and a student at the University 
of Houston.
  He writes:

       Dear Representative Lee: I am a university student who is 
     obtaining an education with the aid of subsidized student 
     loans. I am afraid that this may not be possible for much 
     longer, judging from what I have heard of the rescission 
     bills currently working their way through both Houses. My 
     hope and the hope of many thousands of students is that you 
     will consider the potential leaders and scientists and 
     doctors this country will lose if they cannot obtain an 
     education. Please vote against any cut to student aid. Our 
     future depends on you.

  Mr. Speaker, considering the fact that Republicans plan to eliminate 
18.7 billion dollars' worth of student loan interest deferral will end 
up costing students about $5,000 apiece, I want to promise Eric that 
you will have my support. I will fight against the loss of student 
loans. Finally, I think Eric's letter speaks for itself.

                          ____________________
```