Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 29, 2010 / Notices 60073 

21 Global Network Initiative, available at http:// 

www.globalnetworkinitiative.org/ (2010). 

removed, while preserving the ability of 

Internet intermediaries to continue to 

provide their vital services. 

• What is the impact of third party 

liability laws on businesses’ abilities to 

operate in global markets? How do 

businesses approach these differing 

liability regimes? 

• To what extent do various 

governments’ third party liability laws 

allow for immunity with exceptions for 

Internet intermediaries? How useful are 

such laws? 

• Are there specific principles or 

factors that governments should take 

into account when dealing with content 

restrictions and the intermediaries who 

might be in a good position to monitor 

postings and remove illegal or 

objectionable content? 

• How might governments promote 

innovation in the provision of new 

intermediary services (e.g., by granting 

immunities), while at the same time 

encouraging responsible conduct by 

those same intermediaries? 

5. Trade Agreements 

Trade and investment rules exist in 

WTO commitments, FTAs, and other 

international treaties or agreements. The 

WTO addresses the free flow of 

information in multiple ways. For 

example, Members currently abide by a 

moratorium on customs duties on 

electronic transmissions. In addition, 

WTO member governments allow crossborder trade in services through 

commitments made in the General 

Agreement on Trade in Services, FTAs, 

and other international treaties or 

agreements, which support trade in 

digital products or ease restrictions on 

market access for certain information 

communication technology products 

and services. 

• How might bilateral or multilateral 

trade or other agreements promote the 

free flow of information over the 

Internet? 

• How might these agreements 

promote transparency and the provision 

of due process in the creation and 

application of government restrictions 

to the free flow of information online? 

• With respect to cloud or other Webbased services, are there specific trade 

disciplines that can enhance market 

access for all providers and increase 

legal certainty for potential users? 

• What other affirmative trade 

obligations related to the free flow of 

information over the Internet should be 

considered? 

6. International Cooperation 

There are several intergovernmental 

bodies, including the International 

Telecommunication Union (ITU), 

OECD, Council of Europe, and AsiaPacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) 

forum, that attempt to guide the growth 

of the Internet and online commerce 

through policy negotiations and 

dialogues. Multi-jurisdictional 

governmental organizations such as 

these have the benefit of being inclusive 

(in that by definition they represent the 

interests of member governments) and 

the potential to be authoritative. By 

their nature however, these 

organizations move at a deliberate pace, 

which means that fast-moving Internet 

issues can be difficult for them to 

address. 

Over the past decade the private 

sector, civil society, and academia 

increasingly have engaged in regional 

and international activities focused on 

the development of cross-border 

Internet policy. The IGF, for example, is 

a multi-stakeholder forum that places 

private sector, civil society and 

academic stakeholders on an equal 

footing with their government 

counterparts for an open and spirited 

dialogue on Internet policy. Another 

case in point is the Global Network 

Initiative, which is a voluntary multistakeholder initiative, composed of 

several human rights organizations and 

three major Internet companies who 

together aim to address restrictions on 

the free flow of information on the 

Internet.21 Advocates of multistakeholder initiatives point out that a 

less formal structure can be more 

nimble and thus in a better position to 

address the fast-changing nature of 

Internet offerings. Multi-stakeholder 

initiatives can be formed around 

discrete issues and can be populated by 

interested parties on an ad hoc basis. 

While such organizations cannot 

establish law or regulation, they can 

accelerate the articulation of acceptable 

norms seen as good practices for large 

segments of the population. 

• Are there some multi-jurisdictional, 

governmental forums or multistakeholder, private-sector organizations 

that are better suited than others to 

develop proposals or principles to guide 

governments as they develop policies 

concerning the free flow of information 

on the Internet? 

• What attributes should multistakeholder organizations or initiatives 

possess in order to maximize their 

efficacy? What makes them well-suited 

to develop principles and best practices 

to guide the private sector? Are there 

examples of industry best practices or 

codes of conduct which provide useful 

guidance on how businesses should 

deal with restrictions on the free flow of 

information? 

• What are the pros and cons of 

turning to multi-stakeholder initiatives 

to accelerate norm development instead 

of international governmental bodies? 

• Has private-sector support for 

multi-stakeholder initiatives matured to 

the point where governments can rely 

on those initiatives for the long-term? 

Commenters should feel free to raise 

and address other governance questions 

as they see fit. 

Dated: September 23, 2010. 

Gary Locke, 

Secretary of Commerce. 

Lawrence E. Strickling, 

Assistant Secretary for Communications and 

Information. 

Francisco J. Sa ́nchez, 

Under Secretary of Commerce for 

International Trade. 

Patrick Gallagher, 

Director, National Institute of Standards and 

Technology. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24385 Filed 9–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–60–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

United States Patent and Trademark 

Office 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

The United States Patent and 

Trademark Office (USPTO) will submit 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for clearance the following 

proposal for collection of information 

under the provisions of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). 

Agency: United States Patent and 

Trademark Office (USPTO). 

Title: Initial Patent Applications. 

Form Number(s): PTO/SB/01 and 

01A, PTO/SB/02A and 02B, 02CN, 

02DE, 02ES, 02FR, 02IT, 02JP, 02KR, 

02NL, 02RU, 02SE, and 02LR, PTO/SB/ 

03 and 03A, PTO/SB/04 through 07, 

PTO/SB/13/PCT, PTO/SB/14 and EFSWeb, PTO/SB/16 and EFS-Web, PTO/ 

SB/17 through 19, PTO/SB/29 and 29A, 

and PTO/SB/101 through 110. 

Agency Approval Number: 0651– 

0032. 

Type of Request: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Burden: 11,553,888 hours annually. 

Number of Respondents: 513,221 

responses per year, with an estimated 

466,385 responses filed electronically. 

Avg. Hours Per Response: The USPTO 

estimates that it takes the public 

between 24 minutes (0.40 hours) and 33 

hours and 12 minutes (33.2 hours) to 

complete the applications, petitions, 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
60074 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 29, 2010 / Notices 

and additional papers in this collection, 

depending on the request. This includes 

the time to gather the necessary 

information, prepare the application, 

petition, or other papers, and submit the 

completed request to the USPTO. The 

USPTO calculates that, on balance, it 

takes the same amount of time to gather 

the necessary information, prepare the 

utility, design, or provisional 

application, and submit it to the 

USPTO, whether the applicant submits 

it in paper form or electronically. 

Needs and Uses: This collection of 

information is required by 35 U.S.C. 131 

and 37 CFR 1.16 through 1.84. Each 

patent applicant must provide sufficient 

information to allow the USPTO to 

properly examine the application, 

petition, or paper to determine whether 

the application, petition, or paper meets 

the criteria set forth in the patent 

statutes and regulations. The various fee 

and application transmittal forms, the 

declarations, the cover sheets, the 

petitions, and the papers filed under 37 

CFR 1.41, 1.48, and 1.53(c)(2) permit 

applicants to supply all of the 

information necessary to process the 

application and enables the USPTO to 

ensure that all of the information has 

been provided in order to process the 

application. 

Affected Public: Businesses or other 

for profits and non-profit institutions. 

Frequency: On occasion. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. 

OMB Desk Officer: Nicholas A. Fraser, 

e-mail: 

Nicholas_A_Fraser@omb.eop.gov. 

Once submitted, the request will be 

publicly available in electronic format 

through the Information Collection 

Review page at http://www.reginfo.gov. 

Paper copies can be obtained by: 

• E-mail: 

InformationCollection@uspto.gov. 

Include ‘‘0651–0032 copy request’’ in the 

subject line of the message. 

• Fax: 571–273–0112, marked to the 

attention of Susan K. Fawcett. 

• Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records 

Officer, Office of the Chief Information 

Officer, United States Patent and 

Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, 

Alexandria, VA 22313–1450. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent on 

or before October 29, 2010 to Nicholas 

A. Fraser, OMB Desk Officer, via e-mail 

to Nicholas_A_Fraser@omb.eop.gov or 

by fax to 202–395–5167, marked to the 

attention of Nicholas A. Fraser. 

Dated: September 23, 2010. 

Susan K. Fawcett, 

Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–24354 Filed 9–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–16–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–802] 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Notice of Correction to 

Amended Final Determination of Sales 

at Less Than Fair Value Pursuant to 

Court Decision 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: September 29, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Matthew Renkey, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 9, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–2312. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction 

On September 2, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published the amended 

final determinations pursuant to court 

decision in the investigations of certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil, 

India, the People’s Republic of China, 

Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam. See Certain Frozen 

Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil, India, 

the People’s Republic of China, 

Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Notice of Amended Final 

Determinations of Sales at Less than 

Fair Value Pursuant to Court Decision, 

75 FR 53947 (September 2, 2010) 

(‘‘Amended Final Determinations’’). The 

Amended Final Determinations stated 

that the Department determined dusted 

shrimp to be within the scope of the 

investigations. Subsequent to the 

announcement and release of the 

Amended Final Determinations, the 

Department identified an inadvertent 

error. Specifically, in the table listing 

the antidumping duty rates for the 

companies in the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam, several companies were 

inadvertently omitted. Also, incorrect 

antidumping duty margins were listed 

for three of the Vietnamese companies. 

To resolve these discrepancies, the table 

below lists all of the Vietnamese 

companies along with the correct 

margin. 

VIETNAM 1

Manufacturer/exporter Margin 

(percent) 

Camau Frozen Seafood Processing Import Export Corporation 2 .......................................................................................................... 5.24 

Kim Anh Company Limited 3 .................................................................................................................................................................... 25.76 

Minh Phu Seafood Corporation 4 ............................................................................................................................................................. 4.38 

Minh Hai Joint Stock Seafoods Processing Company 5 ......................................................................................................................... 4.30 

Amanda Foods (Vietnam) Ltd.6 ............................................................................................................................................................... 4.57 

Aquatic Products Trading Company 7 ..................................................................................................................................................... 4.57 

Bac Lieu Fisheries Company Limited 8 ................................................................................................................................................... 4.57 

Coastal Fisheries Development Corporation 9 ........................................................................................................................................ 4.57 

Cai Doi Vam Seafood Import-Export Company 10 .................................................................................................................................. 4.57 

Cam Ranh Seafoods Processing Enterprise Company 11 ...................................................................................................................... 4.57 

Can Tho Agriculture and Animal Products Import Export Company 12 .................................................................................................. 4.57 

Cantho Animal Fisheries Product Processing Export Enterprise 13 ........................................................................................................ 4.57 

C.P. Vietnam Livestock Co. Ltd. ............................................................................................................................................................. 4.57 

Cuu Long Seaproducts Company 14 ....................................................................................................................................................... 4.57 

Danang Seaproducts Import Export Corporation 15 ................................................................................................................................ 4.57 

Hanoi Seaproducts Import Export Corporation 16 ................................................................................................................................... 4.57 

Investment Commerce Fisheries Corporation 17 ..................................................................................................................................... 4.57 

Kien Giang Sea-Product Import-Export Company 18 .............................................................................................................................. 4.57 

Minh Hai Export Frozen Seafood Processing Joint-Stock Company 19 .................................................................................................. 4.57 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES