alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TOBIN, Secretary of Labor, v. PIRCHESKY et al.

Civ. A. No. 9632.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

Dec. 7, 1951.

Ernest W. Votaw, Regional Atty., Howard W. Fineshriber, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Louis Vaira, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendants.

McVICAR, District Judge.

This is an action to enjoin defendants from violating the provisions of Sections 15(a)(1), 15(a)(2), and 15(a)(5) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as .amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 215(a)(1, 2, 5). The Complaint contained the prayer, which reads: “ * * * plaintiff demands judgment permanently enjoining and restraining defendants, their agents, ser*485vants, employees, and attorneys, and all ■persons acting or claiming to act in their behalf and interest, from violating the provisions of Sections 15(a)(1), 15(a)(2), and 15(a)(5) of the Act, and such other and further relief as may be necessary and appropriate.”

Plaintiff alleges repeated violations of the aforesaid Act by defendants in paying their employees wages at rates less than 75 cents per hour since 1950; by employing many of their employees for workweeks longer than 40 hours since February, 1949, without proper compensation; with failure to keep proper records; also, that defendants violated the said Act since February, 1949 by shipping goods in interstate commerce, in the production of which many of their employees were employed in violation of said Act.

Defendants filed an answer. Defendants also demanded a jury trial.

This action is now before us on plaintiff’s motion to strike the demand of defendants for a trial by jury on the ground that such right does not exist under the Constitution or statutes of the United States.

Rule 38(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., provides that: “The right of trial by jury as declared by the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution or as given by a statute of the United States shall be preserved to the parties inviolate.”

The Seventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.”

The action before us is clearly in equity. Equitable issues only are involved. Such issues are triable by the Court, such as the injunction prayed for in this case. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 1937, 301 U.S. 1, 48, 49, 57 S.Ct. 615, 81 L.Ed. 893; Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. v. Candimat Co., D.C.Md.1949, 83 F.Supp. 1; Olearchick v. American Steel Foundries, D.C., W.D.Pa.1947, 73 F.Supp. 273, 279.

The motion before us should be granted.
Exhibit 32.2In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fentura Financial, Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas J. Kelley, Chief Financial Officer of Fentura FinancialInc. certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) the Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.        Dated:  May 11, 2007 /s/ Douglas J. Kelley   Douglas J. Kelley   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 8.1



List of Significant Subsidiaries of United Microelectronics Corporation



|                                      |  |                               |  |                                                |  
|------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------- | -
|Company                               |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |  | Percentage of Ownershipas of December 31, 2004 |  
|Fortune Venture Capital Corporation   |  | Taiwan, ROC                   |  | 99.99                                          | %
|Hsun Chieh Investment Co., Ltd.       |  | Taiwan, ROC                   |  | 99.97                                          | %
|UMC Capital Corporation               |  | Cayman Islands                |  | 100                                            | %
|UMC Group (USA)                       |  | California, USA               |  | 100                                            | %
|UMC Japan                             |  | Japan                         |  | 51.93                                          | %
|UMCi Ltd.                             |  | Singapore                     |  | 100                                            | %
|United Foundry Service, Inc.          |  | California, USA               |  | 100                                            | %
|United Microdisplay Optronics Corp.   |  | Taiwan, ROC                   |  | 83.48                                          | %
|United Microelectronics (Europe) B.V. |  | The Netherlands               |  | 100                                            | %
|United Microelectronics Corp. (Samoa) |  | Samoa                         |  | 100                                            | %
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 79 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1023]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 TRIBUTE TO OUR LADY OF REDEMPTION CHURCH AND BISHOP NICHOLAS J. SAMRA

                                 ______

                          HON. DAVID E. BONIOR

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                          Friday, May 12, 1995
  Mr. BONIOR. Mr. Speaker, this coming weekend Our Lady of Redemption 
Church in my home State of Michigan, is celebrating its 75th 
anniversary. In addition, their interim pastor, Bishop Nicholas J. 
Samra, is celebrating his 25th anniversary as a priest.
  From the very beginning, the founders of Our Lady of Redemption 
Church were committed to seeing the emotional, educational, and 
spiritual needs of the Melkite community fulfilled. These Christian 
immigrants from Syria and Lebanon had been attracted to the growing 
opportunity of Detroit since before the turn of the century. However, 
not until 1920 did these faithful Melkites receive their own priest. In 
that year Bishop Michael Gallagher of the Roman Catholic Church 
requested Melkite Patriarch Dimitri Cadi to send a priest for the 2000-
member Melkite community within his diocese. Since that time the 
Melkite community has grown to become a vital part of the Detroit 
metropolitan area.
  Originally in Detroit, the church moved to Warren to accommodate the 
changing demographics of the community. This weekend, in addition to 
celebrating the past, the members of Our Lady of Redemption Church are 
proudly looking toward the future. The success of this vibrant 
community has enabled them to begin the construction of a new church on 
the current grounds. The groundbreaking ceremony will take place this 
weekend along with the other festivities.
  The Diamond Anniversary of the founding of the church is a proud 
milestone. Likewise, so is the Silver Anniversary of the ordination of 
Bishop Samra. As the community prepares to celebrate these historic 
anniversaries, I applaud the Melkite community for its rich 
contributions to the tapestry that makes up American life in Michigan. 
I commend the congregation for their work and faith and urge my 
colleagues to join with me in wishing congratulations to all the 
members of Our Lady of Redemption Church. May their next 75 years be a 
continued fruitful ministry.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1502 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1502

 To treat certain payments made by Edmond, Oklahoma, as satisfying its 
obligations under the water storage control for Lake Arcadia, Oklahoma, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2007

   Ms. Fallin (for herself and Mr. Cole of Oklahoma) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To treat certain payments made by Edmond, Oklahoma, as satisfying its 
obligations under the water storage control for Lake Arcadia, Oklahoma, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ARCADIA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

    Payments made by the city of Edmond, Oklahoma, to the Secretary of 
the Army in October 1999 of costs associated with present and future 
water storage at Arcadia Lake, Oklahoma, under Arcadia Lake Water 
Storage Contract Number DACW56-79-C-0072 shall satisfy the obligations 
of the city under that contract for such costs, including accrued 
interest.

SEC. 2. OKLAHOMA LAKE DEMONSTRATION, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Release of Retained Rights, Interests, and Reservations.--Each 
reversionary interest and use restriction relating to public parks and 
recreation on the land conveyed by the Secretary of the Army to the 
State of Oklahoma at Lake Texoma pursuant to the Act entitled ``An Act 
to authorize the sale of certain lands to the State of Oklahoma'' (67 
Stat. 63) is terminated.
    (b) Instrument of Release.--As soon as practicable after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall execute and file in the 
appropriate office a deed of release, an amended deed, or another 
appropriate instrument to release each interest and use restriction 
described in subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ted ADDISON.

No. 2010-KP-1787.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2011.

In re Addison, Ted; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 99-7325; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 08-KH-688, 08-WR-1142, 09-KH-919.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
     BROADVISION  INC.'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
     31,  1999 AS  REPORTED  IN ITS FORM 10-Q FOR THE  PERIOD  THEN ENDED AND IS
     QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FILED WITH THE
     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. EPS PRIMARY REPRESENTS BASIC NET INCOME
     (LOSS) PER SHARE.  THE  COMPANY  HAS NOT FILED A  RESTATED  FINANCIAL  DATA
     SCHEDULE  RELATING TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 BECAUSE AMOUNTS
     PREVIOUSLY REPORTED FOR EPS-PRIMARY AND EPS- DILUTED DO NOT DIFFER FROM THE
     AMOUNTS  THAT WOULD BE  REPORTED  UNDER  CURRENT  GUIDELINES  FOR BASIC AND
     DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE, RESPECTIVELY.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              66,932
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       17,202
<ALLOWANCES>                                         (938)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    87,226
<PP&E>                                              14,494
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (6,261)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     120,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               18,224
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           105,150
<OTHER-SE>                                         (6,709)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       120,173
<SALES>                                             12,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    18,464
<CGS>                                                  747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        4,069
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    11,836
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     516
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      3,075
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  3,075
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         2,937
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.11
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            1299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1299
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   27606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           403
<OTHER-SE>                                       20502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     27606
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  8817
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8817)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8817)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8817)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION







I, Williams E. Doyle, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of Guaranty Financial Corporation, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Guaranty Financial Corporation;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and





---

5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Date: August 14, 2003

/s/ William E. Doyle, Jr.

William E. Doyle, Jr.

President and Chief Executive Officer
110406-F-JZ021-732.JPG
            BRIGADIER GENERAL KELTON M. FARRISBrigadier General Kelton M. Farris is vice commander of the Twenty-first Air Force, with headquarters at McGuire Air Force Base, N.J. 

General Farris was born in 1922, at Conway, Ark., where he attended Hendrix College from 1940 to 1942. He accepted an appointment to the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, N.Y., and graduated in 1945 with a bachelor of science degree, a commission as second lieutenant and his pilot wings. He completed multiengine pilot transition training at Laughlin Field, Texas, in October 1945. 

He went to the Philippine Islands in January 1946 and was assigned to Headquarters Pacific Air Command; in May 1946 he became a transport pilot with the 19th Troop Carrier Squadron, Hawaii. From July 1947 to November 1948 he was stationed at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, and then went to Wiesbaden, Germany, as executive officer for the chief of staff, U.S. Air Forces in Europe, and served in the Berlin airlift. 

In May 1951 General Farris was assigned to Headquarters Eighteenth Air Force, at Donaldson Air Force Base, S.C., where he held several operations staff positions. He attended the Air Command and Staff School at Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala., from August 1954 to July 1955, and then was assigned to Headquarters U.S. Air Force in Washington, D.C., as a staff officer in the office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, Personnel. 

He returned to U.S. Air Forces in Europe and held various staff positions in the 322d Air Division at Dreux Air Base and Evreux-Fauville Air Base, France, including Commander of the 10th and 40th Troop Carrier Squadrons. 

General Farris returned to Washington, D.C., in June 1963 and again was assigned to the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, Personnel, this time as deputy chief, Equal Opportunity Group, and in June 1965 became executive officer to the deputy chief of staff. 

He entered the National War College in August 1966; and after graduation in June 1967, he was assigned as vice commander of the 374th Tactical Airlift Wing at Naha Air Base, Okinawa, and in January 1969 became commander. 

In August 1970, General Farris assumed command of the 436th Military Airlift Wing at Dover Air Force Base, Del. 

General Farris became vice commander, Twenty-first Air Force, at McGuire Air Force Base, N.J., in August 1972. 

His military decorations and awards include the Legion of Merit, Distinguished Flying Cross, Air Medal, Air Force Commendation Medal with three oak leaf clusters, Presidential Unit Citation Emblem, and Air Force Outstanding Unit Award Ribbon with three oak leaf clusters. He is a command pilot with more than 6,000 flying hours. 

General Farris' hometown is Conway, Ark. 

He was promoted to the grade of brigadier general effective July 1, 1970, with date of rank June 10, 1970. 

(Current as of April 15, 1973)