alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 8.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF IONA TECHNOLOGIES PLC
 Subsidiary
    
    Country of IncorporationIONA Technologies, Inc.
    
    U.S.IONA Technologies Pty. Limited
    
    AustraliaIONA Technologies Finance
    
    Cayman IslandsIONA Technologies China Limited
    
    ChinaIONA Technologies GmbH
    
    GermanyIONA Technologies UK Limited
    
    UKIONA Technologies Sarl
    
    FranceIONA Technologies Singapore
    
    SingaporeIONA Technologies Japan
    
    JapanIONA Technologies Italia Srl
    
    ItalyIONA Technologies (Suisse) SA
    
    SwitzerlandIONA Technologies (Belgium) SA
    
    BelgiumIONA Technologies Netherlands BV
    
    The NetherlandsIONA Technologies Spain, S.L
    
    SpainIONA Technologies Korea Limited
    
    KoreaIONA Research (Ireland) Limited
    
    IrelandGenesis Development Corporation
    
    U.S.Object-Oriented Concepts, Inc.
    
    U.S.Object-Oriented Concepts, Inc.
    
    CanadaObject-Oriented Concepts Gmbh
    
    GermanyNetfish Technologies, Inc.
    
    U.S.IONA Government Technologies, Inc.
    
    U.S.Orbix Limited
    
    Ireland
EXHIBIT 10.17




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 1 (the "Amendment") to that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of October 31, 2007 (the "Agreement") between Notify Technology Corporation (the "Company") and Gerald Rice (the "Employee"), is made as of December 17, 2008.

In consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Employee agree as follows:

1.

Section 3(a) of the Agreement shall be amended and restated so that it reads in its entirety as follows:

“Base Compensation.  The Company shall pay the Employee as compensation for services a base salary at an annualized rate of $195,000.  Such salary shall be reviewed at least annually and shall be increased from time to time subject to accomplishment of such performance and contribution goals and objectives as may be established from time to time by the Board.  Such salary shall be paid periodically in accordance with normal Company payroll.  The annual compensation specified in this Section 3(a), together with any increases in such compensation that the Board may grant from time to time, is referred to in this Agreement as “Base Compensation”.

2.

Other than as modified by this Amendment, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

This Amendment has been executed effective as of the date set forth above.

NOTIFY TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

EMPLOYEE




/s/ Paul DePond____________

___/s/  Gerald Rice_____________

Paul DePond, Chief Executive Officer

Gerald Rice
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

No. 1D19-709 

_____________________________ 

MAURICE STILLS, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. 

Mark Borello, Judge. 

July 8, 2019 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

RAY, C.J., and WETHERELL and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________ 
2 

Maurice Stills, pro se, Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30778 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. MIKE JAMES Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:06-CV-5970 USDC No. 2:05-CR-59-2
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Mike James, federal prisoner # 29268-034, moves this court for a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, which challenged his conviction for conspiracy to possess cocaine hydrochloride with intent to distribute and possession of 500 grams or moreofcocaine hydrochloridewith intent todistribute. James contends that his indictment and judgment are flawed and that his Fourth Amendment rights United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D May 20, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-30778

2 were violated. He also argues that counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to file pretrial motions, by failing to investigate, and by failing to pursue a direct appeal. He contends that the district court erred by denying his § 2255 motion without first holding an evidentiary hearing. James also moves this court for authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. James’s motion to proceed IFP on appeal is granted. James has made a substantial showi ng of the denial of a constitutional right regarding his claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to file a notice ofappeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); United States v. Tapp, 491 F.3d 263, 266 (5th Cir. 2007). The record does not conclusively indicate whether James asked counsel to file a notice of appeal, maki ng an evidentiary hearing on that issue necessary. See Tapp, 491 F.3d at 266. A COA is granted solely on the issue whether counsel was ineffective for failing tofile a notice ofappeal. The district court’sjudgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings in relation to that claim. James has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right in relation tohis remaining issues. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003). Consequently, COA is denied as to those issues. See id. COA GRANTED IN PART; COA DENIED IN PART; IFP GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Eclipsys Solutions Corp., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Delaware.

SDK Medical Services Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Emtek Healthcare Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of the
State of Delaware.

Eclipsys International Corp., a subsidiary of Eclipsys Solutions Corp. and a
corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware.

Eclipsys Limited, a subsidiary of Eclipsys Solutions Corp. and a limited company
organized under the laws of England and Wales.

Transition Systems, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

HealthVISION, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Delaware.

PowerCenter Systems, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the
State of Delaware.
#### Graue et al. *v.*Brown et al.

[No. 19,300.

Filed January 25, 1961.]

*Raymond B. Rolfes, Richard H. Garvey, William L.*
      *436
      *Woodfill*and *Leon J. Humbert,*all of Greensburg, for appellants.

*Herrod Carr,*of Greensburg, for appellees.

Cooper, J.

This is an attempted appeal from the Decatur Circuit Court,wherein the appellees brought suit against the appellants herein to resist the probate of the last will and testament of one Frank Brown, deceased.

In reviewing the record before us, it affirmatively appears that the appellants have failed to invoke the jurisdiction of the Court to decide this attempted appeal on the merits by failing to file an assignment of errors.

Rule 2-6 of the Supreme Court provides in part:

> “There shall be attached to the front of the transcript, immediately following the index, a specific assignment of the errors relied upon by the appellant in which each specification of error shall be complete and separately numbered.”

The assignment of errors constitutes the appellants’ complaint in this court. Our Supreme Court has stated in substance, it is a requisite to any appeal, and without a proper assignment of errors no jurisdiction is conferred upon the Appellate tribunal. See *Bolden*v. *State*(1956), 235 Ind. 695, 131 N. E. 2d 301; *Davis*v. *Pelley*(1952), 230 Ind. 248, 251, 102 N. E. 2d 910, also Flanagan, Wiltrout and Hamilton’s, Indiana Trial and Appellate Practice, §2381 and authorities cited therein.

This Court must take notice of its lack of jurisdiction on its own motion when the appellee fails in the duty to apprise us of such fact. *Catherwood v. McIntyre*(1934), 99 Ind. App. 220, 221, 192 N. E. 109, and authorities cited therein.

*437It appearing from the record that we lack jurisdiction because of the appellants’ failure to file their assignment of errors as provided by Rule 2-6, this appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Ax, C. J., Myers and Ryan, JJ., concur.

Note. — Reported in 171 N. E. 2d 705.
Garuda Capital Corp
Number                                                                 Shares
1039
                                                               CUSIP 366652 10 5

                                                             SEE REVERSE FOR
                                                             CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

        This certifies that ** _______________________**

is the owner of  *** _____________________________________________________***

             FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF

                              Garuda Capital Corp.

 transferable on the books of the corporation in person or by a duly authorized
attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate
and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Nevada
 and to the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation, as now or
  hereafter amended. This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the
Transfer Agent. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the signature
                        of its duly authorized officers.


DATED:




        /S/                    GARUDA CAPITAL CORP                 /S/
     PRESIDENT                    CORPORATE SEAL                SECRETARY
                                     NEVADA

                                [GRAPHIC OMITTED]
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 
 Amendment Lesso
  Existing Master Lease
 Purchase Agreement Purchaser Eureka Springs Facility
   Definitions




---



##### 



Termination of the Existing Lease as to the Eureka Springs Facility
 Exhibit A-7
  No Reduction in Base Rent
 Representations and Warranties of Lessee
 Execution and Counterparts
 Headings
 Enforceability
 [SIGNATURE PAGES, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, AND JOINDER FOLLOW]
 2




---



##### 



Signature Page to
 LESSOR:STERLING ACQUISITION CORP., aKentucky corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Taylor PickettName:
    
    Taylor PickettTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
 STATE OF MARYLAND
    
    )) ss.COUNTY OF BALTIMORE
    
    )
 26th March Taylor Pickett, CEO
 /s/  Judith A JacobsNotary Public, Baltimore County, MarylandMy commission expires:  May 1, 2008




---



##### 



Signature Page to
 LESSEE
 DIVERSICARE LEASING CORP., a TennesseecorporationBy:
    
    /s/Glynn RiddleName:
    
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    
    EVP & CFO
 STATE OF Tennessee
    
    )) SSCOUNTY OF Williamson
    
    )
 28th March Glynn Riddle EVP & CFO
 /s/ Brenda WimsattNotary Public, Williamson County, TennesseeMy commission expires: 7/25/2009




---



##### 



Acknowledgement to
  ADVOCAT, INC. a Delaware corporationBy:
    
    /s/Glynn RiddleName:
    
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    
    EVP & CFO
 STATE OF Tennessee
    
    )) SSCOUNTY OF Williamson
    
    )
 28th March Glynn Riddle EVP & CFO
 /s/ Brenda WimsattNotary Public, Williamson County, TennesseeMy commission expires: 7/25/2009




---



##### 



Acknowledgement to
 DIVERSICARE MANAGEMENT SERVICESCO., a Tennessee corporationBy:
    
    /s/Glynn RiddleName:
    
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    
    EVP & CFO
 STATE OF Tennessee
    
    )) SSCOUNTY OF Williamson
    
    )
 28th March Glynn Riddle EVP & CFO
 /s/ Brenda WimsattNotary Public, Williamson County, TennesseeMy commission expires: 7/25/2009




---



##### 



Acknowledgement to
 ADVOCAT FINANCE INC., a DelawarecorporationBy:
    
    /s/Glynn RiddleName:
    
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    
    EVP & CFO
 STATE OF Tennessee
    
    )) SSCOUNTY OF Williamson
    
    )
 28th March Glynn Riddle EVP &
CFO
 /s/ Brenda WimsattNotary Public, Williamson County, TennesseeMy commission expires: 7/25/2009




---



##### 



Acknowledgement to
 STERLING HEALTH CAREMANAGEMENT, INC., a KentuckycorporationBy:
    
    /s/Glynn RiddleName:
    
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    
    EVP & CFO
 STATE OF Tennessee
    
    )) SSCOUNTY OF Williamson
    
    )
 28th March Glynn Riddle EVP & CFO
 /s/ Brenda WimsattNotary Public, Williamson County, TennesseeMy commission expires: 7/25/2009
#### ORLEANS PARISH SCHOOL BOARD v. LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 2012-CC-0500.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 2012.

In re Orleans Parish School Board;— Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. L, No. 2006-7342; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2012-C-0020.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             379
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,147
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,808
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,834
<LOANS>                                         33,322
<ALLOWANCE>                                        293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,232
<DEPOSITS>                                      30,318
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                528
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,378
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  43,232
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    705
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   79
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    60
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   844
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 398
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 398
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              446
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    430
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     29
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          29
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        16
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.99
<LOANS-NON>                                        326
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    326
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   293
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  293
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               293
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
582 A.2d 295

#### IN THE MATTER OF LEONARD RUBIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

November 16, 1990.

ORDER

LEONARD RUBIN of WATCHUNG, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1955, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LEONARD RUBIN is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2011 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2011-B, does hereby certify that:

 

1.             NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.             The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.             This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.             A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2013 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.             To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2013.

 

6.             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 27th day of March, 2014.

 

----

 

March 27, 2014

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/   Steven C. Bierman |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Steven   C. Bierman     |
|   | Title: | President               |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1119 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1119

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend title 36, United States Code, to revise the congressional 
charter of the Military Order of the Purple Heart of the United States 
  of America, Incorporated, to authorize associate membership in the 
 corporation for the spouse and siblings of a recipient of the Purple 
                              Heart medal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Purple Heart Family Equity Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP IN THE MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART 
              OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED.

    Section 140503(b) of title 36, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``parents and lineal descendants'' and inserting ``the 
parents, spouse, siblings, and lineal descendants''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 6, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1119

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend title 36, United States Code, to revise the congressional 
charter of the Military Order of the Purple Heart of the United States 
  of America, Incorporated, to authorize associate membership in the 
 corporation for the spouse and siblings of a recipient of the Purple 
                              Heart medal.
```
583 A.2d 347

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT BOTELHO.

March 26, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 58352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XR61


Marine Mammals; File No. 14535

AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION:  Notice; issuance of permit amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  Notice is hereby given that Colleen Reichmuth, Ph.D., 
University of California at Santa Cruz, Long Marine Laboratory, 100 
Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA, has been issued a permit amendment 
(Permit No. 14535-01).

DATES:  Written, telefaxed, or e-mail comments must be received on or 
before October 25, 2010.

ADDRESSES:  The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301)713-2289; fax (301)713-0376;
    Alaska Region, NMFS, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802-1668; phone 
(907)586-7221; fax (907)586-7249; and
    Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long 
Beach, CA 90802-4213; phone (562)980-4001; fax (562)980-4018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Amy Sloan or Jennifer Skidmore, 
(301)713-2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 29, 2010, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (75 FR 37388) that a request for a permit 
amendment to conduct research on captive pinnipeds for scientific 
research had been submitted by the above-named applicant. The requested 
permit has been issued under the authority of the Marine Mammal 
Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and the 
regulations governing the taking and importing of marine mammals (50 
CFR part 216).
    Permit No. 14535-01 authorizes the addition of two non-releasable 
animals of each of the following species to the captive research 
program: ringed seal (Phoca hispida), bearded seal (Erignathus 
barbatus), and spotted seal (Phoca largha). The purpose is to expand 
the comparative understanding of basic perceptual and cognitive 
function among pinnipeds and to assess potential impacts of human noise 
on marine mammals. The amendment is for the duration of the permit, 
which expires on December 31, 2014.
    In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), a final determination has been made that the 
activity proposed is categorically excluded from the requirement to 
prepare an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement.

    Dated: September 17, 2010.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-24040 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE S