alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1402 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1402

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 320 South Lecanto Highway in Lecanto, Florida, as the ``Sergeant 
           Dennis J. Flanagan Lecanto Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2007

  Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida (for herself, Ms. Corrine Brown of 
 Florida, Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Miller of Florida, Ms. 
  Castor, Mr. Crenshaw, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Young of 
 Florida, Mr. Feeney, Mr. Klein of Florida, Mr. Keller of Florida, Mr. 
Mack, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Putnam, Mr. 
  Hastings of Florida, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Mica, Mr. Weldon of 
 Florida, Mr. Meek of Florida, Mr. Wexler, Mr. Mahoney of Florida, Mr. 
Boyd of Florida, and Mr. Stearns) introduced the following bill; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 320 South Lecanto Highway in Lecanto, Florida, as the ``Sergeant 
           Dennis J. Flanagan Lecanto Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT DENNIS J. FLANAGAN LECANTO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 320 South Lecanto Highway in Lecanto, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sergeant Dennis J. Flanagan Lecanto Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Dennis J. Flanagan Lecanto Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1517 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1517

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 to provide for 
  coverage under that Act of employees of State and local governments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2007

Mr. Andrews (for himself, Mr. George Miller of California, Ms. Woolsey, 
 Mr. Bishop of New York, Mr. Payne, Mr. Hare, Ms. Shea-Porter, and Ms. 
  Corrine Brown of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 to provide for 
  coverage under that Act of employees of State and local governments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness for State and Local Workers 
Act''.

SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF STATE AND LOCAL EMPLOYEES.

    Section 3(5) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 
U.S.C. 652(5)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``including a State or political 
        subdivision of a State,'' after ``employees,''; and
            (2) by striking ``or any State or political subdivision of 
        a State''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the quarterly report of Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Harry M. Neer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.











/s/
      Harry M. Neer ___________________


Harry
      M.
      Neer,


Chief
      Executive Officer


November
      14, 2005








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. and will be retained by Rockport Healthcare
      Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.
#### W. W. Scott v. Mexican National R’y Co.

(No. 3164.)

Appeal from Webb County.

Atlee & Earnest, counsel for appellant.

Nicholson, Dodd & Mullally, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 287. *Reconvention; in suit for personal service damage resulting therefrom may be pleaded in; jurisdiction; amount in excess of may be waived so as to confer.*The court did not err in refusing to strike out appellee’s plea in reconvention. The statute (article 650, Revised Statutes) allows set-off or counter-claims to be pleaded where founded on a cause of action arising out of or incident to or connected with the plaintiff’s cause of action. Plaintiff’s claim was for services as engineer of the railroad. Defendant pleaded, in reconvention, damages on account of the negligent act of plaintiff, as engineer, in running his train out of proper time, whereby it came in collision with another train running on proper time, whereby defendant was damaged in the sum of $1,200, asking that $200 of this $1,200 be allowed as a set-off to plaintiff’s claim, waiving the excess over the $200 pleaded. The matter pleaded in reconvention grew out of the employ*497ment of plaintiff as engineer by defendant company, and was incident to and connected with plaintiff’s cause of action as such engineer. The case of Railway Co. v. Hurless, 1 Civil Cas. Ct. App., § 582, is a case directly in point, and to the effect that the railroad company may recover for damages caused by the negligence of its employee, in the performance of his duty, in a suit by the latter for wages earned. It is no objection to the plea that the amount pleaded was in excess of the jurisdiction of the justice court, inasmuch as the defendant only asked for a judgment for $200, which was an amount within the jurisdiction of said court; waiving at the same time the excess over and above the said $200. [1 Civil Cas. Ct. App., § 162; Dalby v. Murphy, 25 Tex. 351.]

January 20, 1892.

Affirmed.
#### Philip F. COSSICH, Jr., individually and as a Member and Chairperson of The Plaquemines Parish Charter Commission, James F. Gasquet, III, Individually and as a Member and Vice Chairperson of the Plaquemines Parish Charter Commission, Robert L. Lobrano, et al. v. PLAQUEMINES PARISH GOVERNMENT, William H. Nungesser, in his Capacity as Plaquemines Parish President, Plaquemines Parish Council, Don Beshel, Keith Hinkley, Jerry Hodnett, Stuart J. Guey, Jr., Anthony Buras, Burghart Turner, John J. Friedman, Lynda G. Banta, and Marla Cooper, etc.

No. 2011-C-0003.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 18, 2011.

In re Plaquemines Parish Council; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certio-rari and/or Review, Parish of Plaquemines, 25th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. *33556-885; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2009-CA-1522.

Denied.
#### Donald BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D07-4895.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 15, 2011.

Donald Baker, Hollywood, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laura Fisher, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

*Affirmed.*Further, we modify our order of September 9, 2009, which denied appellant’s coram vobis petition “without prejudice to refile after the present appeal is disposed of.” The petition is herein simply denied. A petition for coram vobis once could be used to collaterally challenge a conviction in appellate court for which petitioner was no longer in custody. Co-*881ram vobis relief (brought in appellate court) and coram nobis relief (brought in trial court) are no longer necessary or available in Florida. Rule 3.850 has supplanted both coram nobis and coram vobis. *See Wood v. State,*750 So.2d 592, 594 (Fla.1999); *see also Bates v. State,*887 So.2d 1214, 1217 (Fla.2004).

POLEN, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Marine Mammal Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Suzanne Montgomery, Special Assistant to the Executive Director, Marine Mammal Commission, 4340 East-West Highway, Room 700, Bethesda, MD 20814; 301-504-0087; e-mail:                         *smontgomery@mmc.gov.*

Dated: February 1, 2010.

Timothy J. Ragen,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2010-2379 Filed 2-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-31-M
<PAGE>

                          MORSE, ZELNICK, ROSE & LANDER
                         A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP

                                 450 PARK AVENUE
                          NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022-2605
                                  212-838-1177
                                FAX. 212-838-9190




                                 March 29, 2002
                                                            WRITER'S DIRECT LINE
                                                               (212) 838-8040




Mr. Thomas Stuckey
Milestone Scientific, Inc.
220 South Orange Avenue
Livingston, New Jersey 07039

Dear Tom:

         This will confirm that we have agreed to defer payment of the current
balance of fees due us for legal services rendered through February 28, 2002
($320,866.01) until January 2, 2003, except out of the proceeds of new equity
financings, provide that Milestone pays us $2,500 per month in reduction of this
accumulated balance.




                                                     Very truly yours,



                                                     /s/ Stephen A. Zelnick


cc: Mr. Leonard Osser
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1485 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2008 

Received 

OCTOBER 2 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

For the relief of Esther Karinge. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

HR 1485 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ESTHER 

2 KARINGE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

4 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Act, Esther Karinge shall be eligible for issuance of an 

6 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

7 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil8 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

9 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to 

10 lawful permanent resident. 

11 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Esther Karinge 

12 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci13 fied in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have en14 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, 

15 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of 

16 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 

17 enactment of this Act. 

18 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

19 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap20 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica21 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

22 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

23 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

24 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res25 idence to Esther Karinge, the Secretary of State shall in26 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

HR 1485 RFS 

1 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi2 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun3 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi4 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

5 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na6 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

7 202(e) of such Act. 

8 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

9 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

10 parents, brothers, and sisters of Esther Karinge shall not, 

11 by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi12 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 16, 

2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.02



Certifications



I, Edward Escudero, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Petro Stopping Centers, L.P.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: August 12, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Edward Escudero                  
|(Edward Escudero)                    
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5486]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    HEART SURGERY IN THE OTHER BODY

  (Mr. DOGGETT asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mr. DOGGETT. Mr. Speaker, perhaps my colleague from Arizona had best 
direct his remarks to his Republican colleagues in the U.S. Senate. You 
see, yesterday they did a little heart surgery over in the U.S. Senate. 
Yes, my colleague from Texas, Phil Gramm, said the heart, the very 
heart of this budget resolution was a tax cut for the privileged.

                         parliamentary inquiry

  Mr. LINDER. Mr. Speaker, I have a parliamentary inquiry.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Bonilla). The gentleman will state it.
  Mr. LINDER. Mr. Speaker, is it appropriate under the rules to address 
specific actions taken in the other body?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair advises Members that they should 
avoid references to Members of the other body.
  Mr. DOGGETT. Yesterday the U.S. Senate chose to perform heart 
surgery. Sixty-nine Members, including 23 Republicans in that body, 
decided to remove from the budget resolution any tax cut for the 
privileged. That is good news for Americans. We are still not there. We 
still do not have a reasonable budget resolution, but the fact that 
that heart surgery occurred over there in the Senate with joint 
bipartisan participation to add some reason to the budget resolution 
speaks volumes for Medicare recipients, speaks volumes for young people 
in this country, certainly speaks to the needs of Tina Henderson and 
her daughter Erica in my district who stand to lose substantially on 
student loans and student assistance, if the budget resolution the 
House passed is ever written into law.

                          ____________________
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bryan GUILBEAU.

No. 2011-K-0089.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2011.

In re Guilbeau, Bryan; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 5293-08; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-511.

Denied.
ALLONGE NO. 2

      THIS ALLONGE No. 2, by Linsang Manufacturing, Inc. (the "Obligor") and New
Regent Industries Limited and Crown Taylor (the "Holder") is to be attached to
and made part of that certain Convertible Note, made by the Obligor, dated June
26, 2002, for a principal amount of $2,000,000 (the "Note") as modified by that
certain Allonge, by and between the Obligor and Fuel Centers, Inc. on October
15, 2002 ("Allonge No. 1").

      WHEREAS, the Holder is the owner of all of the beneficial interest in the
Note;

      NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration acknowledged to have
been received, Obligor and Holder agree to change the Maturity of the Note as
follows:

      1.    Paragraph number 1 of the Note is deleted in its entirety and
            replaced with the following:

            "The principal balance of the Note shall be payable, together with
            all interest thereon, on demand, subject to Section 4 herein. Upon
            the payment in full of the outstanding principal and all accrued but
            unpaid interest and charges (as referenced in Section 5 below)
            thereon, this Note shall be surrendered to the Obligor for
            cancellation."

      2.    This Allonge No. 2 shall be attached to the Note and made a part
            thereof for all purposes as if executed on the date of the Note.
            Holder's signature below is affixed to evidence its agreement with
            the provisions of this Allonge No. 2.

                                       LINSANG MANUFACTURING, INC.


                                       /s/ Luis P. Negrete
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       By:    Luis P. Negrete
                                       Title: President


                                       NEW REGENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED
                                       AND CROWN TAYLOR


                                       /s/ Jeffrey Taylor
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       By: Jeffrey Taylor
                                       Title: President


                                       /s/ Ng Clifford Sau Man
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       By: Ng Clifford Sau Man, Director,
                                       representing Griffith Agents, Ltd.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1281

DAVID L. BRIGHT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORSHIPCO; NORFOLK SHIPBUILDING & DRYDOCK

CORPORATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CA-96-985-2)

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David L. Bright, Appellant Pro Se. Ronda Lynn Brown, Thomas Michael

Lucas, VANDEVENTER, BLACK, MEREDITH & MARTIN, Norfolk, Virginia,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

complaint claiming employment discrimination, wrongful termination,

and intentional infliction of emotional distress. We have reviewed

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bright v.

Norshipco, No. CA-96-985-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 29, 1997). Further, we

decline to address claims raised by Appellant for the first time on

appeal. See Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 120 (1976); Bakker v.

Grutman, 942 F.2d 236, 242 (4th Cir. 1991). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED