alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pickering J.

CL..U.- —[ J. Parraguirre not under a sentence of death or imprisonment as required by NRS 34.724. See Coleman v. State, 130 Nev. „ 321 P.3d 863, 867 (2014). Therefore, because Romero did not meet the imprisonment requirement of NRS 34.724, he was not eligible for post-conviction habeas relief. See id. For this reason, we affirm the decision of the district court to deny the petition. 2 Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

J. Saitta

cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge Turco & Draskovich Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2 Although the district court incorrectly addressed the procedural bars and merits of the claims, we nevertheless affirm because the district court reached the correct result in denying the petition. See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298, 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (holding that a correct result will not be reversed simply because it is based on the wrong reason).

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2

03) 1947A 

### e
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1468 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and 

Entrepreneurship 

AN ACT 

To ensure that, for each small business participating in the 

8(a) business development program that was affected 

by Hurricane Katrina of 2005, the period in which it 

can participate is extended by 18 months. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HR 1468 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disadvantaged Busi3 ness Disaster Eligibility Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PARTICIPATION TERM FOR VICTIMS 

5 OF HURRICANE KATRINA. 

6 (a) RETROACTIVITY.—If a small business concern, 

7 while participating in any program or activity under the 

8 authority of paragraph (10) of section 7(j) of the Small 

9 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(j)), was located in a parish 

10 or county described in subsection (b) and was affected by 

11 Hurricane Katrina of 2005, the period during which the 

12 small business concern is permitted continuing participa13 tion and eligibility in such program or activity shall be 

14 extended for an additional 18 months. 

15 (b) PARISHES AND COUNTIES COVERED.—Sub16 section (a) applies to any parish in the State of Louisiana, 

17 or any county in the State of Mississippi or in the State 

18 of Alabama, that has been designated by the Adminis19 trator of the Small Business Administration as a disaster 

20 area by reason of Hurricane Katrina under disaster dec21 laration 10176, 10177, 10178, 10179, 10180, or 10181. 

22 (c) REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE.—The Administrator 

23 of the Small Business Administration shall ensure that the 

24 case of every small business concern participating before 

25 the date of the enactment of this Act in a program or 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

HR 1468 RFS

1 activity covered by subsection (a) is reviewed and brought 

2 into compliance with this section. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 26, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,083
<SECURITIES>                                    36,634
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,787
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,584
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,948
<PP&E>                                          15,767
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,667
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            97
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,183
<SALES>                                         13,673
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,379
<CGS>                                              633
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,921
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,352
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   595
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,623
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,094
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,529
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,529
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
        

</TABLE>
583 A.2d 308

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT BYRD.

January 23, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Form 10-K/A
 (Amendment No. 2)
 (Mark One)
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008
 Or
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM  TO
 Commission File Number 001-13003
 Silverleaf Resorts, Inc.
  Texas(State or Other Jurisdiction of 
Incorporation or Organization)
    
    75-2259890
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 1221 River Bend Drive, Suite 120
Dallas, Texas
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    75247
(Zip Code)
 214-631-1166
 Common Stock, $.01 par value
 None
 
 o þ
 o þ
 þ o
 o o
 o
  Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer þ(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company o o þ
 
   DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE




---



##### Table of Contents



EXPLANATORY NOTE
  2




---



##### 



SILVERLEAF RESORTS, INC.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
INDEX TO FORM 10-K/A
 Item Number
    
    
    
    PagePART IIItem 9A(T).
    
    Controls and Procedures
    
    
    4PART IVItem 15.
    
    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
    
    
    5SIGNATUREEX-31.1EX-31.2EX-32.1EX-32.2
  3




---



##### Table of Contents



PART II
 
 ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
  Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 Internal ControlIntegrated Framework
     4




---



##### Table of Contents



Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
  
 PART IV
 
 ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 (a)
    
    The following exhibits are filed as part of this Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report on Form
10-K/A:
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description31.1
    
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule
15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2
    
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule
15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.1
    
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.2
    
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 5




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURE
  SILVERLEAF RESORTS, INC.By:
    /s/ ROBERT M. SINNOTTName:
    Robert M. SinnottTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer 6
exh10.24 2Amend CF EmpAgmt








 




Exhibit 10.24 




SECOND AMENDMENT TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 




This Second Amendment to Employment Agreement ("Agreement"), made on December 8, 2003, is entered into by and between ICO, Inc., a Texas corporation, and its subsidiaries and affiliates (the "Company"), and Charlotte J. Fischer, a Texas resident ("Employee"). 




1. Paragraph 3.3, subsection (b) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended, effective as of December 5, 2003, to read as follows: 




(b)  Retirement. "Retirement" shall mean either (i) Employee's retirement at or after normal retirement age (either voluntarily or pursuant to Company's retirement policy), or (ii) the voluntary termination of Employee's employment by Employee in accordance with Company's early retirement policy. 




2. Paragraph 3.3, subsection (e) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended, effective as of December 5, 2003, to read as follows: 




(e)  Termination of Employee’s employment by the Company for Cause. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "for cause" includes (i) acts of dishonesty or fraud; (ii) knowing violations of any written policy of Company or applicable to the Company’s operations; (iii) violations of applicable laws, rules or regulations that expose Company to damages or liability; (iv) breach of fiduciary duty; or (v) conviction of a felony. If the Company terminates Employee’s employment for Cause, the Company shall provide Employee with a Notice of Termination that states the basis for the Company’s decision to terminate Employee for Cause. 




3. All terms and conditions in the Employment Agreement that are not amended or supplemented pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2 above continue to be in full force and effect between Employee and ICO, Inc. 




 









AGREED AND ACCEPTED: 




ICO, INC. 





	
By: 
	
/s/ Christopher N. O’Sullivan 
	
 
	
/s/ Charlotte J. Fischer 

		


		



	
Printed Name: 
	
Christopher N. O’Sullivan 
	
 
	
Charlotte J. Fischer 

	
Title: 
	
Chairman and President
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-24-00059-CV 

 

ER PROPCO CRAIG, LLC, APPELLANT 

V. 

YULANDA SHNELL CAMPBELL, ET AL., APPELLEES 

On Appeal from the 108th District Court 

Potter County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 111370-E-CV, Honorable Douglas R. Woodburn, Presiding 

April 17, 2024 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. 

Appellant, ER Propco Craig, LLC, appeals from the trial court’s order denying its 

motion to dismiss pursuant to section 74.351 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. 

Now pending before this Court is Appellant’s motion seeking voluntary dismissal of the 

appeal. The Court finds that the motion complies with the requirements of Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent any party 

from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. As no decision of the Court 

has been delivered to date, we grant the motion. The appeal is dismissed. Because the 
2

motion does not reflect an agreement of the parties concerning the payment of costs, 

costs will be taxed against Appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). No motion for 

rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Per Curiam
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 20, 2009 | By:                                                                                   | /s/ Jonathan      Leinwand |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                    | Jonathan      Leinwand                                                                          |
|                    | Chief      Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer and Principal Financial  Officer) |

----
583 A.2d 335

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EDGAR BAEZ.

March 7, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 238 *N.J.Super.*93, 569 A.2d 268)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998          
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              8,896
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    8,896
<PP&E>                                              1,359
<DEPRECIATION>                                        511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      9,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 117
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            4,500
<OTHER-SE>                                          5,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        9,744
<SALES>                                           104,017
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  104,921
<CGS>                                              45,473
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     150,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (92,344)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (92,344)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (91,440)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 20, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 20, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18I0212. THE CITY OF SAVANNAH v. JOANNE SENN et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

STCV1700993
No. 87-6409.

#### Masters *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 15.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  1.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-102605) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan,2.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-126889) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan
and the 2004 Employee Stock Option Plan, and3.
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-142809) pertaining to the 2004 Employee Stock Option
Plan and the 2005 Employee Stock Option Plan
#### Maurice BELL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-4950.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 10, 2011.

Maurice Bell, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. *See Baker v. State,*878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).

BENTON, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent tothe use of our report dated January 23, 2004, included in the Annual Report onForm 10-K of PRAECIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED for the year endedDecember 31, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements,as amended, included in this Form 10-K/A.

 
|                   | /s/ Ernst  & Young LLP |   |
|------------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                   |                       |
|                   |                       |
| Boston,  Massachusetts |                       |
| May 5, 2004            |                       |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# Time and Date: 

1 p.m., Tuesday, September 7, 2010.

# Place: 

1325 G Street, NW., Suite 800, Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005.

# Status: 

Open.

# Contact Person for More Information: 

                        Erica Hall, Assistant Corporate Secretary, (202) 220-2376;                         *ehall@nw.org.*

# Agenda:

I. Call to Order.

II. Draft Policy Regarding Elected Officials.

                    III. Chief Executive Officer's Update.                          ( print page 59748)    

IV. NHSA Update.

V. Resolutions for Approval.

VI. Adjournment.

Erica Hall,

Assistant Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-24124 Filed 9-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7570-02-M
#### J. H. Frank et al. v. O. W. Bean.

(No. 2183.)

Appeal from Wichita County.

*(Transferred from Austin. J*

Wi. M. Flood, counsel for appellants.

Wittioh & McBride, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Will-son, P. J.

*259§ 211. *Exempt property; furniture used in keeping a restaurant "is not exempt; “ tools” and “apparatus furniture not included in meaning of; case stated.*Appellee sued appellants, J. H. Frank and wife, for rent, and sued out a distress warrant which was levied upon certain articles of property used hy appellants in carrying on the restaurant business, said property being upon the rented premises, and valued by the officer making the levy at $72. Frank and wife, with Goldman and Toboliski as their sureties, executed a replevy bond for said property. On the trial of the suit Frank and wife pleaded and claimed that the property levied upon was exempt from forced sale. Appellee recovered judgment for his rent and costs against J. H. Frank, and against said Frank and the sureties on said replevy bond for said rent and costs not to exceed $72, the value of the property replevied, and for the foreclosure of the landlord’s lien upon the property replevied. *Held:*The charge of the court properly instructed the jury that if the property levied upon was household and kitchen furniture it was exempt, but that if it consisted of furniture used in keeping a restaurant, it was not exempt. “Household and kitchen furniture used in hotels and restaurants, beyond that which is used hy the family, is not included in the exemption.” [Heidenheimer Bros. v. Blumenkron, 56 Tex. 308.] Such property does not come within the meaning of “tools” or “apparatus,” as used in the statute of exemptions, and cannot be claimed as exempt under that clause of the statute. The common signification of said words does not embrace *furniture*used in hotels and restaurants.

§212. *Replevy bond; held valid, though not conditioned in accordance with the statute.-*The replevy bond is not conditioned as required by the statute. [R. S. art. 3116.] It is conditioned that if the defendant is condemned in said action, he or some other person will return the property or its value to satisfy the judgment which may be rendered against him, together with inter*260est thereon from date. Its conditions are less onerous than those prescribed by the statute, in that a return of the property satisfies this bond, but would not satisfy a statutory bond. It is well settled that if the departure from the statutory conditions of a bond make it less onerous, the bond may be enforced. [W. & W. Con. Rep. § 649.] It was not error, therefore, to render judgment against the sureties upon said replevy bond. [2 W. Con. Rep. §§ 278, 462.]

December 8, 1886.

§ 213. *Effect of replevy bond; releases property from lien as well as -levy.*It was error to foreclose the landlord’s lien upon the property replevied. The replevy bond released the property not only from the levy, but from said lien. [2 W. Con. Rep. § 462.]

Reversed and rendered.
Exhibit 99.2

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, James N. Ryan, the Chief Executive Officer of PDC 1996-D Limited Partnership, hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

_____/s/ James N. Ryan______________

Name: James N. Ryan

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: __March 21., 2003________
#### TERRY RICHARDSON *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 23126)

Foti, Bishop and Dupont, Js.

Submitted on briefs March 21

officially released April 8, 2003

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.