T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J U D Y K U RN I A ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 70042 A ge nc yN os . A 079- 273- 934

A 079- 273- 935 A 079- 273- 936 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bur a ry15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. JudyK urni aa nd hi s f

a m i l y , na t i ve s a nd c i t i z e ns of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i on f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng thei r app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng the i rc l a i m s f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve 

# FI LED MA R 01 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 70042 2 j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo que s t i ons of l a w a nd f

or s ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e f

a c tu a l f in d in g s . W

akkaryv. H

older , 558 F . 3d 1049, 1056 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 9 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e a g e n c y ’s f in d in g th a t p e titio n e r s f a ile dto e s t abl i s h pa s tpe r s e c ut i on oraw e l l - f ounde d f e a rof f utur e pe r s e c ut i on on a c c ount o f th e ire th n ic ityo rr e lig io n . See H al i m v. H older , 59 0 F . 3d 97 1, 97 5-77 (9th C i r. 2009) . S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the a ge nc y ’ s f i ndi ng tha tthe i nc i de nt s of m is tr e a tm e n t p e titio n e r s e x p e r ie n c e dd idn o t r is e to th e le v e l o f p e r s e c u tio n . See W a kka ry , 558 F . 3d a t1059- 60 ( di s c r i m i na t orym i s tr e a tm e nti nc l udi ng be a t i ngs a nd r o b b e r ie s b yn a tiv e I n d o n e s ian y o u th s a n db e in g a c c o s te db yh o s tile m o b d idn o t, w ith o u t m o re , “ cu m u lati v ely a m o u n t t o p as t p er se cu ti o n ,” an dh arm to p etit io n er ’s a s s oc i a t e s di d notc ons t i tut e pa s tpe r s e c ut i on w he r e i tw a s not“ c l os e l yt i e d t o” pet i t i on erhi m se l f) (i nt ernal qu ot at i on and ci t at i on om i tt ed). In addi t i on , even as m e m b e r s o f

ad is f a v o r e dg r o up , p e titio n e r s h a v e n o t d e m o n s tr a te dth e r e q u is ite in d iv idu a liz e dr is ko f

p e r s e c u tio n . See H

a lim , 5 9 0 F .3 da t 9 7 7 - 7 9 ( p e titio n e rd id n o tsh o w h e w as o r l i k el y w o u l db e i n d i v i du al l y t arg et edan dfai l edt o d i st i n g u i sh

“ hi s e xpos ur e f

r om thos e of

a l l othe re thni c C hi ne s e I ndone s i a ns ” ) ( c i t a t i on o m itte d ) ; c

f. Sa e l v . A s h c r o

ft , 386 F . 3d 922, 927- 29 ( 9th C i r . 2004) . F i na l l y , the re cord i n thi s c as e does notcom pel the concl usi on thatpet i t i on er s have e st abl i shed08- 70042 3 ap a tte rn o rp r a c tic e o f

p e r s e c u tio n o f

e th n ic C h in e s e o rC h r is tian s in I n d o n e s ia . See W a kka ry , 5 5 8 F . 3 dat1 0 6 0 -6 2 . A cco rd i n g l y, p et i t i o n ers’ asyl u m cl ai m fai l s. B e c aus e pe t i t i one r s ha ve f a i l e d t o m e e tthe l ow e rs t a nda r d of pr oof f or a s y lu m , th e irc la im f

o rw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l n e c e s s a r ilyf

a ils . See Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 45 3 F . 3d 11 82 , 11 90 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). P e t i t i one r s ha ve notm a de a nya r gum e ntr e ga r di ng the a ge nc y ’ s de ni a l of C A T r e lie f

. Se e M a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 1256, 1259- 60 ( 9th C i r . 1996) (i ss ues notspec i fi ca l l y r ai se d and ar gu ed i n a party’ s openi ng bri ef ar e w ai ved). F i na l l y , w e r e

j e c tpe t i t i one r s ’ due pr oc e s s c ont e nt i on be c aus e the yha ve not s h o w n p r e

ju d ic e f r o m a n ym is s in g p a rt o f th e A u g u s t 2 7 , 2 0 0 1 , h e a r in g tr a n s c r ip t. See Koh l iv. G on zales , 4 7 3 F . 3 d1 0 6 1 , 1 0 6 8 -6 9 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 7 ) (n o du e p ro cess vi ol at i on w here no prej ud i ce show n). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.