alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2



                      Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
September 22, 1998, except for Note 21, as to which the date is February 8,
1999, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Blue Rhino Corporation which appear in the Annual Report on Form
10-K, and in the following:

     .  Form S-8 (No. 333-80909) pertaining to the Company's Amended and
        Restated Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors

     .  Form S-8 (No. 333-80907) pertaining to the Company's 1994 Stock
        Incentive Plan

     .  Form S-8 (No. 333-80911) pertaining to the Company's 1998 Stock
        Incentive Plan

                                     /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
October 28, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,307,000
<SECURITIES>                                 5,917,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,801,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (3,767,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,912,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,022,000
<PP&E>                                     135,909,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (37,964,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             300,722,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,114,000
<BONDS>                                    115,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       134,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 162,474,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               300,722,000
<SALES>                                     13,979,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           133,818,000
<CGS>                                       17,962,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,176,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            63,223,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,181,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,466,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,352,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,114,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,114,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Franklin Street Properties
Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, John G. Demeritt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

            (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operation of the Company.


Date: February 24, 2006                /s/ John G. Demeritt
                                       -----------------------
                                       John G. Demeritt
                                       Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements pertaining to the employee stock option plans of United
Microelectronics Corporation:



|1. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-102605) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan,
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-126889) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan and the 2004 Employee Stock Option Plan, and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-142809) pertaining to the 2004 Employee Stock Option Plan and the 2005 Employee Stock Option Plan
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated April 30, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of United Microelectronics Corporation, and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting of United Microelectronics Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/ Ernst & Young

Ernst & Young

Taipei, Taiwan,

Republic of China

April 30, 2010
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael A. COE.

No. 2010-KO-1245.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 17, 2010.

*18In re: Coe, Michael A.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. N, No. 08-1709; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 09-KA-1012.

Denied.
#### Michael and Christine DAUZAT v. STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT.

No. 2011-CC-0723.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2011.

In re Department of Transportation and Development; State of Louisiana; —Defendants); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Avo-yelles, 12th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 2005-7740; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 10-01422.

Not considered. Not timely filed. See Supreme Court Rule X, Section 5(d). Motion to dismiss denied as moot.

KNOLL, J., recused.
583 A.2d 330

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FRANK SEXTON.

February 27, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Merchants’ & Planters’ Oil Company v. W. M. Seeligson.

(No. 2936.)

Appeal from Goliad County.

Brown & Burns, counsel for appellant.

D. D. Claiborne, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 206. *Venue of suit against a private corporation, etc.; case stated.*Seeligson sued the oil company in justice’s court, precinct No. 1, Goliad county, Texas, for *309the value of certain cotton seed sold and shipped by him to said company. His cause of action was a verified account. Appellant, the oil company, pleaded in abatement their special privilege to be sued in Harris county, the county of its residence, or where it was doing business; that it had no agent in Goliad county, and had made no contract for payment in said county. This plea in abatement was overruled both in the justice’s court and the county court, and judgment was rendered in each of said courts in favor of appellee, Seeligson, and the oil company has appealed the case to this court. The only question on this appeal is as to the correctness of the ruling of the county court upon appellant’s plea in abatement of special privilege to be sued in Harris county. By section 10, article 1556, Revised Statutes, it is provided that “suits against private corporations, associations and joint-stock companies may be brought in any county and precinct in which the cause of action or a part thereof arose, or in which such corporation, association or company has an agency or representation, or in which its principal office is situated.” In this case the question is, where and when did the cause of action arise? Recurring to the facts in the record, we find that the oil company wrote Seeligson, before he shipped the cotton seed: “We will be glad to handle your shipments, and beg to quote you $9 per ton good crop seed, f. o. b.” Seeligson’s contract was complete, and the cause of action accrued as soon as he loaded the cotton seed f. o. b. on the cars. Under the statute and' the evidence the suit was properly brought in justice’s precinct No. 1, Goliad county, and the court did not err in overruling appellant’s plea in abatement to be sued in Harris county.

January 31, 1891.

Affirmed.
#### W. D. Crockett et al. v. Ann Maxey.

(No. 3234.)

Appeal from Washington County.

Campbell & Pennington, counsel for appellants.

Searcy & Garrett, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Davidson, J.

§ 292. *Cost bond; affidavit in lieu of, insufficient if made by the wife when her husband is a party plaintiff.*This was a suit brought by Ann Maxey and her husband, Louis Maxey, to recover of the constable and his sureties on his official bond damages for the seizure and sale of two mules, levied upon by said constable by virtue of an execution and order of sale issued upon a judgment in favor of M. A. Perkins & Son and J. W. Scurry against the husband, Louis Maxey. M. A. Perkins, O. P. Per*505kins and J. W. Scurry were also made parties defendant in this suit by plaintiffs. It was claimed that the mules thus seized and sold were the separate property of the wife, Ann Maxey, and that they were not subject to seizure and sale under the laws. Defendants entered a motion that a rule for costs be entered against the plaintiffs in the suit, and, in answer to the rule for costs, Ann Maxey, the wife, made affidavit *in forma pauperis*in lieu of the cost bond. The husband did not unite or join with her in this affidavit, and the court admitted the affidavit in lieu of the cost bond over objection of defendants. We are of opinion that the affidavit, under the circumstances shown in the record, was not a sufficient compliance with the rule in law to entitle the parties to prosecute their suit. A married woman, except in certain cases of abandonment, or refusal by her husband to unite with her in a suit for the recovery of her separate property, etc., cannot institute and prosecute suits in her own name without joining her husband with her. Where the husband is joined in a suit for the purpose of prosecuting her rights, he is the proper party to execute the bond for costs when ruled thereto, or, in lieu thereof, he is the proper party to file the affidavit *in forma pauperis.*The husband in this instance was a party to the suit. The affidavit of the wife does not preclude the idea that her husband, the necessary party to the suit, was unable to pay the costs, or to give security therefor. We are of opinion that article 1438 of the Revised Statutes, with regard to the pauper affidavit in lieu of the cost bond, contemplates that the affidavit of inability to give bond must be made by the necessary parties plaintiff to the suit. Because the affidavit *in forma pauperis*made by the wife, not being joined by her husband, was insufficient in law, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

January 23, 1892.

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 32.1


Certification Pursuant


to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Cenveo, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the ‘‘Company’’), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:






The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended April 3, 2010 (the ‘‘Form 10-Q’’) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May 12, 2010


/s/ Robert G. Burton, Sr.


Robert G. Burton, Sr.


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





Date: May 12, 2010


/s/ Mark S. Hiltwein


Mark S. Hiltwein


Chief Financial Officer







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cenveo, Inc. and will be retained by Cenveo, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                              INFOSEEK CORPORATION
                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Three Months Ended               Nine Months Ended
                                                     September 30,                    September 30,
                                              ------------------------        ------------------------ 
                                                 1997            1996           1997            1996
                                              --------        --------        --------        -------- 
<S>                                          <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Net Loss                                      $ (4,493)       $ (3,696)       $(20,533)       $(11,986)

Weighted average common shares
outstanding during the period                   26,777          25,931          26,452          11,642

Shares related to SAB No. 55, 64
and 83                                            --              --              --             4,161

Conversion of preferred stock not
included in shares related to SAB
No. 55, 64, and 83                                --              --              --             4,534
                                              --------        --------        --------        --------

Total shares used in net loss per share         26,777          25,931          26,452          20,337

Net loss per share (Pro forma in 1996)        $  (0.17)       $  (0.14)       $  (0.78)       $  (0.59)
                                              ========        ========        ========        ========
</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viewpoint Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Jay
S. Amato and William H. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our
knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: August 13, 2004
    By:
    /s/ JAY S. AMATOJay S. AmatoPresident and Chief Executive Officer Dated: August 13, 2004
    By:
    /s/ WILLIAM H. MITCHELLWilliam H. MitchellChief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

# AGENCY:

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

*Board Action:*                     Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules of Procedure, as amended in April, 2004, notice is hereby given that the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has issued an Exposure Draft of a Concepts Statement on Measurement of the Elements of Accrual-Basis Financial Statements in Periods After Initial Recording.                

                    The Exposure Draft is available on the FASAB home page                     *http://www.fasab.gov/​exposure.html.*                     Copies can be obtained by contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350.                

Respondents are encouraged to comment on any part of the exposure draft. Written comments are requested by November 30, 2010, and should be sent to: Wendy M. Payne, Executive Director, Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board, 441 G Street, NW, Suite 6814, Mail Stop 6K17V, Washington, DC 20548.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wendy Payne, Executive Director, at (202) 512-7350.

Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463.

Dated: September 21, 2010.

Charles Jackson,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-24047 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
Exhibit 10.2


 


MIVA, INC.


 


AMENDMENT I


 


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


WHEREAS, MIVA, Inc.
(“Employer”) and Lowell Robinson (“Executive”) entered into an Executive
Employment Agreement, effective December 15, 2006 (“Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, Section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, was enacted in 2004, and
places strict rules on the time and form of certain payments provided
under the Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Employer and Executive may, by written consent of both parties, amend the
Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Employer and Executive desire to amend the Agreement to bring it into
compliance with Code Section 409A so as to avoid the imposition on
Executive of excise taxes.


 


NOW THEREFORE, it is
agreed, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, that, effective January 1, 2009, that the Agreement is
amended as follows:


 


1.                                      The
last sentence in Section 6(a) is deleted and replaced with the
following:


 


For purposes of this Section 6, ‘Termination Date’ shall mean the
date on which a ‘separation from service’ occurs, as defined in Treasury
Regulation Section 1.409A-1(h).


 


2.                                      The
following Section 6(j) is added to the Agreement:


 


Notwithstanding any provision in this Section 6 to the contrary,
if Executive is a “specified employee” as defined in Section 409A of the
Code and the Company determines that any amounts to be paid to Executive under
this Section 6 are subject to Section 409A of the Code, then the
Company shall not commence payment of such amounts until the earlier of (a) the
date that is six months after the Executive’s Termination Date or (b) the
date of the Executive’s death.  Any
amount that otherwise would have been payable but for the delay described above
shall be aggregated and paid with the first payment under this Section 6(j).


 


3.                                      The
last sentence of the first paragraph of Section 8(a) is deleted in
its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


The reduction of the amounts payable hereunder, if applicable, shall be
made by reducing first the payments under Section 8.


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
Executive has hereunto set his hand, and Employer has caused this Amendment I
to be executed in its name and on its behalf, as of the 23rd day of December 2008.


 


 


	
   

  	
  MIVA Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Peter A. Corrao

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
  President and CEO

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Executive

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Lowell Robinson

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Lowell Robinson
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AARP LICENSE AGREEMENT  


 


This Amendment is entered into by and between AARP, Inc. (“AARP”) and HearUSA, Inc. (“HUSA”) as of the 22 day of December 2008.  (AARP and HUSA are referred to herein as each a “Party” and collectively, the “Parties.”)


 


WHEREAS, the Parties along with AARP Services, Inc. (“ASI”) entered into the Hearing Care Program Services Agreement, effective August 8, 2008, pursuant to which HUSA is to provide or arrange to provide through HUSA’s network of hearing care providers an AARP-branded discount hearing program for the benefit of AARP Members (the “Services Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, the Parties entered into the AARP License Agreement, effective August 8, 2008 (the “License Agreement”); and 


 


WHEREAS, on November 18, 2008, HUSA requested that AARP restructure the royalty compensation structure of the License Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements of the Parties herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree to amend the License Agreement as follows:


 





	
             
 	
            1.
 	
            Section 4 of the License Agreement shall be deleted.
 






 





	
             
 	
            2.
 	
            The Parties will negotiate in good faith a revised royalty compensation structure that is mutually agreeable to the Parties, which structure must be determined and agreed to by the Parties on or before January 16, 2009.
 






 





	
             
 	
            3.
 	
            If the Parties are unable to reach agreement on the revised royal compensation structure on or before January 16, 2009, AARP may, in its sole and absolute discretion, extend the deadline.
 






 





	
             
 	
            4.
 	
            If the Parties are unable to reach a mutually acceptable revised royalty compensation structure on or before January 16, 2009 (or such later date as is set by AARP at its sole and absolute discretion), AARP reserves the right to terminate the License Agreement and engage another entity to provide the Program.
 






 


Except for the above modifications, all other terms and conditions of the License Agreement shall remain in full effect.


 


[signatures appear on the following page]













 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AARP and HUSA have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as Amendment No. 1 to the License Agreement.


 


AARP


 


By:     /s/ Thomas Nelson                    


Name:   Thomas C. Nelson


Title:     Chief Operating Officer


 


 


HearUSA, Inc.


 


By:     /s/ Stephen J. Hansbrough        


Name:   Stephen J. Hansbrough


Title:     Chief Executive Officer



 


 






2