alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Dale G. Rettinger, the Chief Financial Officer of PDC 1996-D Limited Partnership, hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

_/s/ Dale G. Rettinger                       

Name: Dale G. Rettinger

Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: __March 21, 2003_________
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trans Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lisa A. Corbitt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/S/  LISA A. CORBITT


Lisa A. Corbitt


Chief Financial Officer


November 15, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Lowenstein, Appellant, *v.*Schwallie, Appellee.

(Decided March 24, 1941.)

*Messrs. Batterman, Cowell & Fletcher,*for appellant.

*396
      *Mr. Sterling Brown*and *Mr. Harold Brown,*for appellee.

By the Court.

The only error urged in argument and brief is that the court refused to give a special charge on the subject of the measure of damage.

The bill of exceptions is not certified as containing all the evidence, and it does not contain the instructions to the jury, although there is a recital that instructions were given. It does set forth the refused charge.

The jury returned a general verdict for the defendant.

Assuming that the refused charge was correct, can it be said that its refusal was prejudicial error ?

An examination of the pleadings discloses that the defendant denied that he had assaulted the plaintiff. The answer is a general denial. The bill of exceptions shows that there was evidence to support this denial and to the effect that the injuries from which the plaintiff claimed he was suffering were inflicted in an affray in which he had engaged with another man on another occasion.

In this state of the record, there were two issues to be submitted to the jury: (1) Had the defendant assaulted the plaintiff, and (2) if so, what damage was inflicted?

From the record, we cannot say that the first issue was not submitted without error, and that the jury’s general verdict was not based on that issue. The instruction complained of did not relate to that issue, and would not have affected the jury’s determination of it. Under such circumstances, the two-issue rule applies. We cannot say that the error, if any, was prejudicial. Prejudice, if any, does not affirmatively appear.

For these reasons, the judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Matthews, P. J., Ross and Hamilton, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 14.2 

 

**Code of Ethical Conduct for Senior Financial Officers**

 

In my role as the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, or principal accounting officer or controller, or a person performing similarfunctions (collectively, “Senior Financial Officers”) of U.S. Restaurant Properties, Inc. (the “Company”), 

 

I recognize that I hold an important and elevated role in corporate governance. I am uniquely capable and empowered to ensure that shareholders’interests are appropriately balanced, protected and preserved. Accordingly, this Code provides principles to which Senior Financial Officers are expected to adhere and advocate. This Code embodies rules regarding individual and peerresponsibilities, as well as responsibilities to the Company, the public and shareholders. 

 

I certify that I adhere to and advocate the following principles and responsibilities governing my professional and ethical conduct: 

 

1. I act honestly and ethically, including ethically handling actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal andprofessional relationships. 

 

2. I act to ensure full, fair,accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by the Company. 

 

3. I comply with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations.

 

4. I act in good faith, responsibly and with due care anddiligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing my independent judgment to be subordinated. 

 

5. I do not disclose any confidential information acquired in the course of my work, except when authorized or when I am legally obligated to disclosesuch information. I do not use such confidential information for personal advantage. 

 

6. I comply with the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all employees. 

 

7. I promptly report to the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee any conduct that I believe to be a violation of law or businessethics or of any provision of this Code or the Company’s Code of Conduct and Ethics, including any transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to such a violation. 

 

I understand that violations of this Code of Ethical Conduct for SeniorFinancial Officers, including failures to report actual or potential violations by others, will be viewed as a severe disciplinary matter that may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment. 

 

Signature: /s/ Stacy M. Riffe

                    PrincipalFinancial Officer 

 

Date: March 15,2004
422 A.2d 1165

#### Leckonby v. Leckonby, Appellant.

Argued June 6, 1979.

George A. Hahalis, for appellant; Richard Stevens, for appellee.

Before PRICE, GATES and DOWLING, JJ.*

*

 President Judge G. Thomas Gates of the Court of Common Pleas of Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, and Judge John C. Dowling of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, are sitting by designation.

Order affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          45,541
<SECURITIES>                                    51,952
<RECEIVABLES>                                  306,119
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               439,946
<PP&E>                                         314,773
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,987
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 897,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          261,565
<BONDS>                                        179,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           756
<OTHER-SE>                                     432,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   897,145
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               536,159
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  479,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   762
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 216
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,370
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,779
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,591
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,591
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BARRY DWAYNE MINNFEE,

 Appellant,

v.

WARDEN II DAVID SWEETIN, 

INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY,

ASSISTANT WARDEN RICHARD

GUNNELS, and WILLIAM C. HAMAN,

 Appellees. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-11-00100-CV

Appeal from

 112th District Court

of Crockett County, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This case is before the Court on our own motion to determine whetherit should be dismissed

for lack of jurisdiction. Because there is no appealable order, we will dismiss.

Appellant, who is imprisoned, attempted to file a pleading in the district court. Although the

nature of the pleading is not entirely clear, it appears that Appellant alleged that prison officials had

committed intentional torts against him. The district court clerk responded by letter, stating that she

diligently searched her records, but was “unable to locate any previous criminal filings in this county

on you.” The clerk advised Appellant to file his “petition” in the county where he was sentenced. 

There is no indication that the clerk filed Appellant’s pleading. Appellant filed a notice of appeal. 

The Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that there does not appear to be an appealable

order, and that the Court therefore intended to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction unless any

party could show grounds for continuing the appeal. Although Appellant responded to the Clerk’s
notice, the response is incomprehensible. 

This Court has appellate jurisdiction over final judgments and certain interlocutory orders. 

Cantu Servs., Inc. v. United Freedom Assocs., Inc., 329 S.W.3d 58, 62 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2010, no

pet.). In this case, there is no order from which Appellant may appeal. See Moody v. Spivey, No.

06-10-00066-CV, 2010 WL 3450351, at *1 (Tex.App.--Texarkana Sept. 3, 2010, no pet.)(mem.

op.)(dismissing appeal because no order had been entered bythe trial court). Accordingly, the appeal

is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.1

May 11, 2011 

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

When a district clerk refuses to file a pleading, the proper remedy is a writ of mandamus from the district

1

court. In re Bernard, 993 S.W.2d 453, 454 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding)(O’Connor, J.,

concurring).
#### S. Jacobs Bernheim & Co. v. Cumby & James.

(No. 1443, Op. Book No. 3, p. 493.)

Appeal from Hopkins County.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 586. *Agent; declarations of, as evidence to bind principal.*Appellees recovered judgment against appellants for the value of a horse killed by overdriving by one Harby, alleged to be appellants’ agent. On the trial appellees were permitted to prove, over the objections of appellants, that Harby, the alleged agent, had testified on a former trial of the cause that at the time he hired the horse from appellees he was in the employ of appellants, and was using the horse when he was killed, in the business of appellants. *Held,*this evidence was of the first importance viewed in the light of the other testimony. Was it competent ? Most evidently it was not. Mr. Gfreénleaf states the rule thus: “A kindred principle governs in regard to the *declarations of agents.*The principal constitutes the agent his representative in the transaction of certain business; whatever, therefore, the agent does in the lawful prosecution of that business is the act of the principal whom he represents. And where the acts of the agent will bind the principal, there his *310representations, declarations and admissions, respecting the subject matter, will also bind him, if made at the same time, and constituting part of the *res gestae.*They are of the nature of original evidence, and not of hearsay; the representation or statement of the agent, in such cases, being the ultimate fact to be proved, and not an admission of some other fact. But it must be remembered that the admission of the agent cannot always be assimilated to the admission of the principal. The party’s own admission, whenever made, may be given in evidence against him; but the admission or declaration of his agent binds him only when it is made during the continuance of the agency in regard to a transaction then depending, *et dum fervet opus.*It is because it is a verbal act, and part of the *res gestae,*that it is admissible at all, and, therefore, it is not necessary to call the agent to prove it; but whenever what he did is admissible in evidence; there it is competent to prove what he said about the act while doing it; and it follows that, where his right to act in the particular matter in question has ceased, the principal can no longer be affected by his declarations, they being mere hearsay.” [1 G-reenl. Ev. § 113.] What was the particular matter in question in the case in hand ? Evidently the hiring of the horse by the agent to be used in the business of the principal. This certainly had ceased, and being after the horse was dead, declarations of the agent in regard to' this matter were not admissible.

November 8, 1882.

Reversed and remanded.
583 A.2d 306

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JERALD DOUGLAS ALBRECHT.

January 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
|   |         |                                                            |         |   |         |   |         |   |         |   |         |   |   |   |   |   |
|--------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|--------|--------------|--------|--------------|--------|--------------|--------|--------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|        |    |  KPMG LLPSuite 140055 Second StreetSan Francisco, CA 94105 |    |   |    |   |    |   |    |   |    |   |

|   |         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |         |   |
|--------|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|--------|
|   |    | KPMG LLP is a Delaware limited liability partnership,the U.S. member firm of KPMG International Cooperative(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. |    |   |

----

----
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Kunsan AB Airmen ace Red Flag-Alaska 23-2

              - Published  June 27, 2023
              -                             By Senior Airman Karla Parra                                                    
              - 8th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

**EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska (AFNS) --  **
**Kunsan Air Base** Airmen trained with U.S. Army, U.S. Air Force, Japan Self Defense Force and Republic of Korea air force service members during exercise Red Flag-Alaska 23-2, a **Pacific Air Forces**-sponsored annual exercise designed to enhance readiness in a simulated combat environment, June 12 — 23.    
U.S. Air Force Airman 1st Class Wyatt Martin, an 80th Fighter Generation Squadron assistant dedicated crew chief, conducts post-flight maintenance on an F-16 Fighting Falcon during RED FLAG-Alaska 23-2 at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, June 14, 2023. RF-A allows pilots to train in the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex, an air, ground and electronic combat training range covering more than 77,000 square miles. (U.S. Air Force photo by Ricardo Sandoval)
Photo Details /                Download Hi-ResAirmen of the 80th Fighter Squadron and 80th Fighter Generation Squadron sharpened their tactics, techniques and procedures during the large-force, multilateral and integrated combat training across 77,000 square miles at the **Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex**. 

“Red Flag has been occurring for over 40 years, giving young Airmen the experience of what could be their first five combat missions,” said Col. Mike McCarthy, RF-A 23-2 deployed forces commander and 8th Operations Group commander. 

With approximately 2,500 personnel and 70 participating aircraft, RF-A 23-2 served as an ideal platform for international engagement. This iteration exhibited interoperability amongst allies and partners including the JASDF and ROKAF.

“We are excited to welcome JASDF and ROKAF to this iteration of RED FLAG-Alaska,” said Maj. William Hock, 354th Operations Group Detachment 1 assistant director of operations. “Their participation allows the opportunity to exchange tactics, techniques and procedures while we train for full spectrum engagements and large-scale joint engagement.”

Each iteration of RF-A provides a unique opportunity to integrate various forces into joint, coalition and multilateral training focused on varying training objectives. This iteration focused on airlift operations with a capstone joint forcible entry exercise. 

“The exercise has grown and developed over the years and one of the best aspects of it is giving us a venue for our joint and coalition partners to come together and enhance our ability to communicate, integrate and successfully complete the mission together,” McCarthy said. 

The annual exercise is a commitment by the Department of Defense to ensure that U.S. Forces are capable and ready to face the challenges in the Indo-Pacific region.U.S. Air Force Logo
LRUSAFAFAir ForcePACAFPacific Air ForcesKunsan ABexercisetrainingAlaskaJoint Pacific Alaska Range ComplexRed Flag-Alaska
#### Randolph C. CLARK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-6090.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 20, 2011.

Elizabeth Yerrington, Assistant Regional Counsel, Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking a belated appeal of the corrected judgment and sentence rendered on or about June 24, 2011, in Duval County Circuit Court Case No. 16-2009-CF-001202-AXXX, is granted. Upon issuance of mandate a copy of this opinion shall be furnished to the clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. The court notes that the lower tribunal has appointed the Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel to represent petitioner in the belated appeal authorized by this opinion.

WOLF, HAWKES, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
583 A.2d 348

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WALTER LEE CRAIG.

March 26, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 237 *N.J.Super.*407, 568 A.2d 100)
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Mike ALVAREZ.

No. 2011-KO-2767.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 2012.

In re Alvarez, Mike; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Re*1246view, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 07-2136; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-KA-223.

Denied.
NU M BER 13- 04- 0003 5-C V 

### COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _______ _ ROS A IM EL DA

R IVERA , ED UA RD O CA VA ZOS M ONTEM A

YOR, A ND M A RC EL A

M ONT EM A

YOR , A pp ellan ts,

v . PA TL . P AC E A N D MA RY JO E PAC E, E TA L ., A p p el le es .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ___ On ap pe al f rom th e 3 57t h Dist rict C ou rt of C amero n Co un ty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ___ 

### ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON Be fo re Ju stice s R od rigu ez, Garza, a nd Ve la M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam This appeal w as abated by thi s Cou rt on June 3, 20 04, d ue to the bankr uptcy of one of the par

ti es to t his appeal

. See 11 U .S.C . § 362; see g ene rally T EX . R. A PP . P. 8. Since the a bat em entt here has be en n o activity in this app eal. On Feb ruary 5, 20 09, the Cou rt2

ordered the parti es to fil e an adv is or y reg ardin g the sta tus of the a ppeal and, i f appli cabl e, a moti on to rein sta te t he appe al or a mot ion to dis mis s t he appe al. App ellant s respon ded to the order by informin g the Court tha t the y n o longer desire to prosec ute t hei r appeal and th e ca se shoul d be re ins tated and dis mis sed for w ant o f prosec uti on. Acc ordin g ly , w e rein sta te a n d d ismis s t he appe al for w ant o f pros ecut ion

. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42 .3(b).

PERC UR IAM Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and filed thi s t he 12th day

of Ma rc h, 20 09.
News United States Air Force
 Service members involved in UH-60 crash identifiedPublished March 16, 2015
                        
                        By Eglin Air Force Base Public Affairs
                **EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                It is with a heavy heart that the U.S. Marine Corps Forces, U.S. Special Operations Command and the Louisiana National Guard formally announced the names of the seven Marines and four Soldiers who died in an Army UH-60 Black Hawk crash near Eglin Air Force Base, at approximately 8:30 p.m., March 10.They include:Marine Capt. Stanford H. Shaw, III, 31, from Basking Ridge, New JerseyMaster Sgt. Thomas A. Saunders, 33, from Williamsburg, VirginiaStaff Sgt. Marcus S. Bawol, 26, from Warren, MichiganStaff Sgt. Trevor P. Blaylock, 29, from Lake Orion, MichiganStaff Sgt. Liam A. Flynn, 33, from Queens, New YorkStaff Sgt. Kerry M. Kemp, 27, from Port Washington, WisconsinStaff Sgt. Andrew C. Seif, 26, from Holland, MichiganArmy Chief Warrant Officer 4 George Wayne Griffin Jr, 37Chief Warrant Officer 4 George David Strother, 44Staff Sgt. Lance Bergeron, 40Staff Sgt. Thomas Florich, 26Recovery efforts for the UH-60 began March 13. Once the aircraft has been removed from the water, the recovery operations are expected to be turned over to a safety investigation board. The effort will be led by the U.S. Army Combat Readiness Center from Fort Rucker, Alabama.*(Information for this story was contributed by Eglin Air Force Base Public Affairs, Release Number: 050315; Capt. Barry J. Morris, U.S. Marine Corps Forces Special Operations Command; and the Louisiana National Guard)*Black Hawk 



Marines 



Army National Guard 



helicopter 



recovery 



Eglin AFB 



AFMC 



UH-60 Related Links
        Eglin transitions to recovery effort
            
            Eglin responds to aircraft recovery
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

3/4/2015

OFF8G8AL BUSINESS '

STATE ©F TEXAS/f^ |1

PENALTY F0K §§"o9f,

PRIVATE USE

JACKSON, JAMES EDWARDSThis is to advise that the Court has'denied withoj,

writ of habeas corpus.

JAMES EJ2WARDS JACKSON

20002 GflERRY OAKS LANE

HUMjZLE, TX 77346

.^"S

02 1M

504279596 MAR06 2015

Bailed from ziW.Re747644f04

written order the application for

Abel Acosta, Clerk

I A

AMRS3B ?3^B Miiil-1M'Plrll',hl-"''iillilii'MHill!'l'-H1killM1,i1'

^