alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|                                                        |   |                          |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                        |   | Years      Ended December 31, |   |
| (in      000’s)                                       |   | 2007                          |   |   | 2006   |   |   | 2005   |   |   | 2004   |   |   | 2003   |   |
|                                                        |   |                          |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Pretax      income (loss) from continuing operations        |   | $                             | 45,102 |   |   | $      | 37,408 |   |   | $      | 32,151 |   |   | $      | 13,158 |   |   | $ | (14,628 | ) |
| Add      back fixed charges, excluding capitalized interest |   |                          | 25,808 |   |   |   | 22,545 |   |   |   | 17,980 |   |   |   | 18,371 |   |   |   | 17,356 |   |
| Income,      as adjusted                                    |   | $                             | 70,910 |   |   | $      | 59,953 |   |   | $      | 50,131 |   |   | $      | 31,529 |   |   | $ | 2,728 |   |
|                                                        |   |                          |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed      charges:                                         |   |                          |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest      on debt and capitalized leases                |   | $                             | 24,610 |   |   | $      | 21,662 |   |   | $      | 17,253 |   |   | $      | 17,627 |   |   | $ | 16,550 |   |
| Portion      of intersest cost capitalized to Inventory     |   |                          | 2,134  |   |   |   | 869    |   |   |   | 1,100  |   |   |   | 322    |   |   |   | 279 |   |
| Interest      element of rentals                            |   |                          | 1,198  |   |   |   | 883    |   |   |   | 727    |   |   |   | 744    |   |   |   | 806 |   |
| Total      fixed charges                                    |   | $                             | 27,942 |   |   | $      | 23,414 |   |   | $      | 19,080 |   |   | $      | 18,693 |   |   | $ | 17,635 |   |
|                                                        |   |                          |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio      of earnings to fixed charges                     |   |                          | 2.54   |   |   |   | 2.56   |   |   |   | 2.63   |   |   |   | 1.69   |   |   |   | 0.15 |   |

----
#### Jason Lavell NICKOLAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D10-6231.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 9, 2011.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee; Jason L. Nickolas, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this *Anders*
      *1*
      **appeal, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remand for the trial court to correct the order revoking his probation. Although the State alleged that Appellant violated his probation by committing five new law offenses, the lower court found that the evidence supported revocation based only on the offense of resisting an officer with violence. The revocation order provides, however, that Appellant violated the conditions of his probation by committing all five offenses. We, therefore, remand for the trial court to correct the revocation order. *See Washington v. State,*37 So.3d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (affirming a judgment and sentence in an *Anders*appeal but remanding for the court to correct a revocation order reflecting the appropriate condition violated); *Leggs v. State,*27 So.3d 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (affirming, in an *Anders*appeal, the appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remanding with directions that the trial court enter an order specifying the conditions of probation violated). Appellant need not be present. *See Baldwin v. State,*855 So.2d 1180 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (remanding for entry of a written revocation order conforming to the oral pronouncement in an *Anders*appeal).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

THOMAS, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ„ concur.

. *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our reports dated March 8, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over
financial reporting included in the Annual Report ofForce Protection, Inc.on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Force Protection, Inc. on Forms S-8
(No. 333-139977, effective January 12, 2007; File No. 333-155534, effective November 21, 2008 and File No. 333-162943, effective
November 6, 2009).

/s/
Grant Thornton LLP

Columbia,
South Carolina
March 8, 2010

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          14,154
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     52,515
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          54,223
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            13,237
<LOANS>                                        191,066
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,961
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 304,199
<DEPOSITS>                                     253,314
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,176
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,285
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,633
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 304,199
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,181
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,005
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   272
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,458
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,494
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,808
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,650
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      370
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,326
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,326
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,703
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .99
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.43
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,058
<LOANS-PAST>                                       172
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,961
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      185
<RECOVERIES>                                       111
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,257
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,257
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1****Rule 13a-14 Certification**I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Cronos Group (the “Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the AuditCommittee of Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report information; and(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 10, 2005/s/ DENNIS J. TIETZ
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1003 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2007 

Received 

MARCH 19, 2007 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

AN ACT 

To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring 

Act of 1998 to reauthorize the United States Advisory 

Commission on Public Diplomacy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

HR 1003 RFS

1 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF UNITED STATES ADVI2 SORY COMMISSION ON PUBLIC DIPLOMACY. 

3 Section 1334 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Re4 structuring Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6553) is amended by 

5 striking ‘‘October 1, 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 

6 2009’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 13, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1114 

To require the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of 

Reclamation and the United States Geological Survey, to conduct a 

study on groundwater resources in the State of Alaska, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Interior, acting through 

the Bureau of Reclamation and the United States Geological Survey, to conduct a study on groundwater resources in the State of Alaska, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alaska Water Re5 sources Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1114 IH

1 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of the Interior. 

3 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

4 of Alaska. 

5 SEC. 3. ALASKA WATER RESOURCES STUDY. 

6 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary, acting through the Com7 missioner of Reclamation and the Director of the United 

8 States Geological Survey, where appropriate, and in ac9 cordance with this Act and other applicable provisions of 

10 law, shall conduct a study that includes— 

11 (1) a survey of accessible water supplies, includ12 ing aquifers, on the Kenai Peninsula and in the Mu13 nicipality of Anchorage, the Matanuska-Susitna Bor14 ough, the city of Fairbanks, and the Fairbanks 

15 Northstar Borough; 

16 (2) a survey of water treatment needs and tech17 nologies, including desalination, applicable to the 

18 water resources of the State; and 

19 (3) a review of the need for enhancement of the 

20 streamflow information collected by the United 

21 States Geological Survey in the State relating to 

22 critical water needs in areas such as— 

23 (A) infrastructure risks to State transpor24 tation, 

25 (B) flood forecasting, 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1114 IH

1 (C) resource extraction; and 

2 (D) fire management. 

3 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the date 

4 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 

5 to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of 

6 Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Nat7 ural Resources of the Senate a report describing the re8 sults of the study required by subsection (a). 

9 SEC. 4. SUNSET. 

10 The authority of the Secretary to carry out any provi11 sions of this Act shall terminate 10 years after the date 

12 of the enactment of this Act. 

13 SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

14 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

15 as are necessary to carry out this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1203 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit the use 

of any contribution made to a candidate for election for Federal office, 

or any donation made to an individual as support for the individual’s 

activities as the holder of a Federal office, for the payment of a salary 

to the candidate or individual or to any member of the immediate 

family of the candidate or individual. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2007 

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. 

TERRY, Mr. CARTER, and Mr. MILLER of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

prohibit the use of any contribution made to a candidate 

for election for Federal office, or any donation made 

to an individual as support for the individual’s activities 

as the holder of a Federal office, for the payment of 

a salary to the candidate or individual or to any member 

of the immediate family of the candidate or individual. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1203 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Candidate Anti-Cor3 ruption Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING USE OF CONTRIBUTIONS AND DONA5 TIONS FOR SALARIES OF CANDIDATES OR OF6 FICEHOLDERS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 313(b)(2) of the Federal 

8 Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 439a(b)(2)) is 

9 amended by striking ‘‘is used to’’ and inserting ‘‘is used 

10 for the payment of a salary to the candidate or individual 

11 involved or to any member of the immediate family of the 

12 candidate or individual involved, or is used to’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact15 ment of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, 

16 except that the amendment shall not apply with respect 

17 to any payment of a salary which is made prior to the 

18 expiration of the 60-day period which begins on the date 

19 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MCLEOD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                     366,999,000
<SECURITIES>                               107,190,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               30,089,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,889,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,409,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           481,940,000
<PP&E>                                     123,617,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,105,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             779,654,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       72,066,000
<BONDS>                                    304,304,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       525,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 393,702,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               779,654,000
<SALES>                                     35,747,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,747,000
<CGS>                                       21,200,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,200,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            27,605,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               502,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,447,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (13,355,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (13,355,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (13,355,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in 

 

Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-54706; 

Amendment No. 5 to Registration Statement No. 333-66371; 

Registration Statement No. 333-99435; 

Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-108054; and

Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-111183 

 

of U.S. Restaurant Properties, Inc. on Forms S-3 and to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-68302 of U.S.Restaurant Properties, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 12, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to changes in the methods of accounting for discontinued operations in 2002 andasset retirement obligations in 2003 as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144*, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets* and SFAS No. 143, *Accounting for Asset RetirementObligations*, respectively), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of U.S. Restaurant Properties, Inc. filed on or about March 15, 2004. 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas 

March 12, 2004
News United States Air Force
 New era of airpower exhibited at world’s largest air showPublished July 11, 2016
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Zachary Bumpus
                        
                        
                        501st Combat Support Wing Public Affairs
                **ROYAL AIR FORCE FAIRFORD, England (AFNS)  --**
                For a moment there is relative quiet, only the buzz of conversations and laughter of children. Then, once again, sound falls like a hammer as another jet begins to throw itself into the sky, trailing colored smoke as it strives to impress the crowd of eager onlookers. The 2016 Royal International Air Tattoo is in full swing.The RIAT is the world’s largest military air show, with 32 air arms represented and a projected 160,000 attendees over the course of the weekend. Among the aircraft present were the newest additions to American airpower, the F-35 Lightning II A and B variants, as well as the F-22 Raptor and numerous legacy and special mission aircraft from U.S. forces.More than just a spectacular show, RIAT 16 demonstrated the deterrence capabilities of the U.S. and its allies.“I hope that there is concern about what this coalition is capable of,” said Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David L. Goldfein, who attended RIAT 16. “We as a nation greatly value allies, partners, and coalitions. As we get together, I hope those who contemplate what is acceptable will take notice.”RIAT 2016 also marked the first time that the F-35 has been displayed overseas, with the F-35A variant being displayed by the U.S. Air Force and the B variant being jointly displayed by the U.S. Marine Corps, the Royal Air Force and the Royal Navy. For the first time partner nations could experience the culmination of their efforts in the F-35 program“Fifth-generation aircraft are what we’ve aspired to for a long time,” said Gen. Frank Gorenc, the commander of U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa. “The F-35 isn’t just an aspiration for the U.S. but for our partner nations as well, and this is the first time the other countries got to feel the power of their purchase.”For most people who attended, RIAT 16 wasn’t complicated by thoughts of strategy or purchasing programs, they came to have fun, see exciting new aircraft alongside favorites from the past, and to be amazed by aerobatic feats.With a weekend full of fantastic displays of pilot skill, mixing of air forces leadership, and a debut performance RIAT 16 was a show to be remembered.RIAT 



Royal International Air Tattoo 



F-35 Lightning II 



F-22  Raptor 



RAF Fairford 



USAFE 



EUCOM
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Written StatementPursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

The undersigned,Paul E. Ross, the Chief Financial Officer of Meade Instruments Corp. (the “Company”),pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, hereby certifies that:

           (i)  the Form 10-K for the fiscal yearended February 28, 2007 of the Company (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

         (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

Date: August29, 2007
| By:                                          | /s/ PAUL E.  ROSS |   |
|----------------------------------------------|-------------------|--------|
| *Senior Vice President—Finance and CFO* |

 

----