alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

# In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlternativeResources Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endingSeptember 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based ontheir knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for theperiods covered in the Report.

 

 
|     /s/ George W. Watts             |                    |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| George W. Watts, Chief Executive Officer                | Date: November 14, 2003 |
|                                                    |                    |
|                                                    |                    |
|       /s/ Steven  Purcell |                    |   |
| Steven Purcell, Chief Financial Officer                 | Date: November 14, 2003 |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997             FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1996             MAR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997             FEB-29-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                               4                       3
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,078                   4,539
<ALLOWANCES>                                       248                     333
<INVENTORY>                                     12,077                   6,462
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,027                  11,547
<PP&E>                                           2,473                   1,860
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,023                     635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,524                  13,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,775                   7,364
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,490                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         3,511                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4,952)                  4,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,524                  13,035
<SALES>                                         47,151                  29,770
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,151                  29,770
<CGS>                                           31,845                  20,054
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,845                  20,054
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,357                   6,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,657                     659
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,292                   2,756
<INCOME-TAX>                                       960                   1,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,332                   1,556
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                       (4,310)                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,978)                  1,556
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.84)                    .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.84)                    .34
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBBIE O. THOMAS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 415 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of February, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,695
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                       451
<INVENTORY>                                     16,090
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,185
<PP&E>                                         197,922
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,271
<BONDS>                                              0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           21,705
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (19,856)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   229,185
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               162,932
<CGS>                                          126,771
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  157,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,332
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,017
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    202
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                202
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       202
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CURRENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR
ACCOMPANYING NOTES THERETO.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Aug. 9Published Aug. 9, 2016
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Nicholas Koetz
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- On this look around the Air Force, in reference to the Real ID Act, some forms of identification will no longer be accepted to gain entrance to Air Force facilities; Air Force ROTC cadets experience a special tactics obstacle course; and a B-52 Stratofortress crew completes a mission that took more than 20 hours. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Nicholas Koetz.
For previous episodes, click here.
Related links:
- Some IDs may be invalid starting Aug. 15
- Future officers forfeit summer to train with special tacticsATAF 



Hurlburt Field 



B-52 



Barksdale AFB 



ID 



Real ID Act 



ROTC
News United States Air Force
 MQ-9 crashes in northern SyriaPublished July 5, 2016
                        
                        By U.S. Air Forces Central Command Public Affairs
                **SHAW AIR FORCE BASE, S.C. (AFNS) --**
                An MQ-9 Reaper crashed in northern Syria July 5. The aircraft was flying a combat mission when positive control of the aircraft was lost. The remotely piloted aircraft crash was not due to enemy fire. There are no reports of civilian injuries or damage to civilian property at the crash site.The MQ-9 was destroyed by coalition aircraft and is not in enemy hands.An investigation board will convene to determine the specific cause of the crash.Syria 



AFCENT 



MQ-9
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1199 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 212
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1199

                      [Report No. 110-341, Part I]

       To extend the grant program for drug-endangered children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2007

  Mr. Cardoza (for himself, Mr. Larsen of Washington, and Ms. Hooley) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

                           September 24, 2007

    Additional sponsors: Mr. Herger, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. Walz of 
Minnesota, Ms. Shea-Porter, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Abercrombie, Ms. Jackson-Lee 
of Texas, Mr. Hinojosa, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Terry, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, 
       Mr. Baird, Mrs. McMorris Rodgers, and Mr. Walden of Oregon

                           September 24, 2007

              Reported from the Committee on the Judiciary

                           September 24, 2007

Committee on Energy and Commerce discharged; committed to the Committee 
 of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the grant program for drug-endangered children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Drug Endangered Children Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. DRUG-ENDANGERED CHILDREN GRANT PROGRAM EXTENDED.

    Section 755(c) of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization 
Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 3797cc-2(c)) is amended by striking ``fiscal 
years 2006 and 2007'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2008 and 2009''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 212

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1199

                      [Report No. 110-341, Part I]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

       To extend the grant program for drug-endangered children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 24, 2007

              Reported from the Committee on the Judiciary

                           September 24, 2007

Committee on Energy and Commerce discharged; committed to the Committee 
 of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1017

ZIAD AKL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ALFRED D. SWERSKY; SARAH HALEY; DEBORAH BAUM;

KAREN-FAYE MCTAVISH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (1:06-cv-00964-LMB)

Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 26, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ziad Akl, Appellant Pro Se. James Van Ingold, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Jack McKay,

PILLSBURY, WINTHROP, SHAW & PITTMAN, LLP, Washington, D.C., for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ziad Akl appeals the district court’s orders granting the

Defendants’ motion to dismiss this civil action, and denying the

subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Akl v. Swersky, No. 1:06-cv00964-LMB (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 17, 2006 & entered Nov. 20, 2006;

filed Dec. 22, 2006 & entered Dec. 26, 2006). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gordon McGilton certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Force Protection,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such  Statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 22, 2005

/s  Gordon McGiltonPrincipal Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22784]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of approved Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes an extension of Gaming between the 
Oglala Sioux Tribe and the State of South Dakota.

DATES: Effective Date: September 14, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary--Policy and 
Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. This amendment allows for the 
extension of the current Tribal-State Compact until December 31, 2010.

    Dated: September 2, 2010.
Donald Laverdure,
Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010-22784 Filed 9-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
News United States Air Force
 Aviano F-16s take on Arctic Challenge 2015Published May 27, 2015
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Evelyn Chavez
                        
                        
                        31st Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **KALLAX AIR BASE, Sweden (AFNS) --**
                At the invitation of the government of Sweden, More than 150 Airmen and 12 F-16 Fighting Falcons from the 31st Fighter Wing at Aviano Air Base, Italy, arrived at Norbotten Wing here in support of Arctic Challenge Exercise 2015. This year, the multinational flying exercise will include approximately 115 combat aircraft from nine different countries including the U.S., Finland, Sweden and Norway. The Arctic Challenge exercise will focus on improving interoperability with fellow air forces to prepare for any possible future challenges."The aim of ACE 15 is to provide a safe exercise with a large and unrestricted training area and demanding scenario," said Col. Carl-Johan Edstrom, the Norbotten Wing deputy exercise director. "This will give participating units an extraordinary opportunity to plan, execute and evaluate large force employments in a multinational air operation."The exercise, larger than the first which took place in 2013, will operate over the skies of Finland, Norway and Sweden, and as many as 90 aircraft will fly simultaneously. The exercise will allow for prompt responses on how to improve practices particularly in a multinational environment."The biggest and most important part of participating in ACE 15 is the interoperability with the different allied nations and partners," said Maj. Brian Kellam, the 510th Fighter Squadron chief of advance programs and fighter pilot.  "Knowing each other's tactics is essential, so when a real situation arises, we are familiar with how each country operates; the familiarity will lead to better proficiency in our missions."The 510th FS hope to maintain their joint readiness and strengthen their European relationships by conducting close air support operations, air interdiction and defensive counter air scenarios during the exercise.  According to Kellam, experiencing this type of large force exercise will prepare them by testing their management while flying."Typically we fly with maybe six to eight maximum aircraft daily," Kellam said.  "The exposure to operating with 90 aircraft at the same time will pay big dividends (for everyone), especially our young pilots."Throughout the duration of the exercise, U.S., NATO and Partners for Peace militaries will work in a joint environment to deliver unified responses for simulated contingencies. ACE 15 is scheduled to continue until June 5, before concluding with its final air operations.Aviano 



F-16 Fighting Falcon 



Buzzards 



Arctic Challenge
#### Richard FERTITTA v. ALCOA, INC., et al.

No. 2011-CC-2128.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Global Remediation Inc. f/k/a Bella Company; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. C, No. *91311-847; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-C-1289.

Stay denied; writ denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00452-CR

Hector Augusto GRAMAJO,

Appellant

v.

The ST

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR9359

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 11, 2013

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED 

Hector Augusto Gramajo was convicted by a jury of intoxication manslaughter. The jury 

found Gramajo used or exhibited a deadly weapon during the commission of the offense and 

assessed punishment at nine years’ imprisonment. The trial court ordered the sentence to run 

consecutively with the sentence imposed for an intoxication assault conviction tried at the same 

time. Gramajo timely appealed the trial court’s judgment. 

Gramajo’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in 

which she concluded this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements 
04-12-00452-CR

of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1978), and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Gramajo was provided a 

copy of the brief and motion to withdraw and was further informed of his right to review the record 

and file his own brief. Gramajo did not file a pro se brief. 

After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we find no reversible error and agree with 

counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2005). We therefore grant the motion to withdraw filed by Gramajo’s counsel and affirm the 

trial court’s judgment. See id.; Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 

1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).1

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Do not publish

1 No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Gramajo wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court 

of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition 

for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days after either this opinion 

is rendered or the last timely motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration is overruled by this court. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with the clerk of the Court of Criminal 

Appeals. See id. R. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the requirements of rule 68.4 of 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 68.4.

- 2 -