alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
****Exhibit 31.2 

 

**Certifications**

 

I, Edward Escudero, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Petro Financial Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 13, 2003 

/s/ Edward Escudero

     (Edward Escudero)

     Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer 

 

1
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 of
PHL Variable Insurance Company (the Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          |  |                       |  |                      |  |        |  |                                                            
|------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Philip K. Polkinghorn |  |                       |  | /s/ Peter A. Hofmann
|Name:                     |  | Philip K. Polkinghorn |  |                      |  | Name:  |  | Peter A. Hofmann                                           
|Title:                    |  | President             |  |                      |  | Title: |  | Senior Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|Date:                     |  | March 18, 2008        |  |                      |  | Date:  |  | March 18, 2008                                             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to PHL Variable Insurance Company and will be retained by PHL
Variable Insurance Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1341 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1341

To require corporate income reported to the Internal Revenue Service to 
     be included in annual reports to the Securities and Exchange 
                              Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2007

 Mr. Gillmor (for himself, Ms. DeGette, Mr. Kucinich, and Mr. Jones of 
 North Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require corporate income reported to the Internal Revenue Service to 
     be included in annual reports to the Securities and Exchange 
                              Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honest Income Disclosure Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORTING OF TAX INCOME OF PUBLICLY TRADED CORPORATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(15 U.S.C. 78m) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(m) Disclosure of Income Reported to the IRS.--Not later than 180 
days after the date of enactment of the Honest Income Disclosure Act, 
the Commission shall revise the regulations under this section to 
require that each annual report required to be filed under this section 
include the income reported by the issuer to the Internal Revenue 
Service for the most recent taxable year. Such regulations shall 
require that such income be presented in a prominent location in each 
report and in a manner that permits a ready comparison of such income 
to income otherwise required to be included in such reports under 
regulations issued under this section.''.
    (b) Requirements for the EDGAR System.--The Securities and Exchange 
Commission shall require that the information required to be filed with 
the Commission pursuant to regulations issued under the amendment made 
by subsection (a) be in a form and manner suitable for entry into the 
EDGAR system, and shall, immediately upon receipt of such information, 
make such information available via that system.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
SuperGen, Inc.  June 30, 1999  Consolidated Financial Statements
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          13,690
<SECURITIES>                                     1,229
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                      1,396
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,925
<PP&E>                                           3,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,088
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        88,476
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,918
<SALES>                                          2,340
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,340
<CGS>                                            1,192
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,597
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,166)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,166)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,166)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.48)


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appea ls

San Antonio, Texas

October 12, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00538

- CV

William Alec TISDALL , M.D. and William A. Tisdall, M.D., P.A. d/b/a Spine & Joint Pain Specialists, Appellants

v.

Thomas VAREBROOK and Rebecca Varebrook,

Appellees

From the 37th Judicial Distr ict Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 06007 Honorable Michael E. Mery , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

We grant appellees' motion for extension of time to file their brief. We order appellees' brief due October 23, 2020.

________________________________ _ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of October, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
#### STATE ex rel. Ronald L. AMIDEI v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-2323.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2011.

In re Amidei, Ronald L.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 12-08-0550; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 1097.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          26,498
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                       380
<INVENTORY>                                     13,597
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,977
<PP&E>                                         193,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,012
<BONDS>                                              0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,328
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (19,178)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   236,877
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               323,324
<CGS>                                          258,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  299,205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,021
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (317)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (317)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (12,745)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,062)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CURRENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR ACCOMPANYING
NOTES THERETO.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
581 A.2d 507

#### IN THE MATTER OF NORMAN ROBBINS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 31, 1990.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that NORMAN ROBBINS of WOOD-BRIDGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1960, be publicly reprimanded for violating *RPC*8.4(c) by improperly affixing his jurat to a deed that contained signatures that were not genuine, and said NORMAN ROBBINS having been Ordered to Show Cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and good cause appearing;

*455It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review are adopted and NORMAN ROBBINS is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
583 A.2d 335

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MATTHEW JAMES BREWER.

March 7, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 31.2I, Douglas J. Kelley, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fentura Financial, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting        Dated:  November 9, 2007 /s/ Douglas J. Kelley   Douglas J. Kelley   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Viewpoint Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Patrick Vogt and
Christopher C. Duignan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                          |     |                                        
|------------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------
|Dated:
  November 9, 2007 | By: | /s/ PATRICK
  VOGT                     
|                          |     |                                        
|                          |     | Patrick Vogt                           
|                          |     | President
  and Chief Executive Officer
|                         
|                          |     |                                        
|Dated:
  November 9, 2007 | By: | /s/ CHRISTOPHER
  C. DUIGNAN           
|                          |     |                                        
|                          |     | Christopher
  C. Duignan               
|                          |     | Chief
  Financial Officer              

---
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 72 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 

2008, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Public Law 110–92 is further amended by striking 

4 the date specified in section 106(3) and inserting ‘‘Decem5 ber 31, 2007’’. 
2 

•HJ 72 EH 

1 SEC. 2. Public Law 110–92 is further amended by 

2 adding at the end the following new sections: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 160. Notwithstanding any other provision of 

4 this joint resolution, there is appropriated for payment to 

5 the heirs at law of Julia Carson, late a Representative 

6 from the State of Indiana, $165,200. 

7 ‘‘SEC. 161. Notwithstanding section 106, the author8 ity to provide care and services under section 

9 1710(e)(1)(E) of title 38, United States Code, shall con10 tinue in effect through September 30, 2008. 

11 ‘‘SEC. 162. Notwithstanding section 106, the author12 ity provided by section 2306(d)(3) of title 38, United 

13 States Code, shall continue in effect through September 

14 30, 2008.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 19, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 72 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for the 

fiscal year 2008, and for other purposes.
#### John N. Hatch v. Allan & Swartz.

(No. 2091.)

Appeal from Calhoun County.

A. B. Petticolas, counsel for appellant.

No counsel appeared for appellees.

Opinion by

Will-son, J.

§ 229. *Jurisdiction of county court where title to land is incidentcdly involved; case stated.*Appellant sued appellees in the county court to recover of them $500 damages for the alleged wrongful and malicious conversion by them of certain lumber. In his petition he alleges that he was the owner of a certain tract of land, setting out his title to said land; that he placed said lumber upon said land, intending to erect the same into a house thereon; that defendants wrongfully, maliciously, etc., seized said lumber and converted the same to their own use; that said lumber was of the value of $380, which he claims as his actual damages, and he prays judgment for said actual damages, and for $120 exemplary damages. He also alleged in his petition that appellees knew that said land belonged to him, but that they illegally, maliciously, etc., set up an unfounded claim thereto in themselves. Appellees demurred generally to the petition, which demurrer the court sustained and dismissed the suit. The demurrer was sustained upon the ground that the suit involved title to land, and that therefore the court did not have jurisdiction of the suit. *Held*error. The lumber was personal property. It had not been erected into a house, or otherwise attached to the land so as to constitute it a part of *278the realty. The allegations in the petition concerning the ownership and title to the land we regard as matter of inducement merely, intended and necessary for no other purpose than to predicate, thereon a claim for exemplary damages. Allegations of the attendant circumstances of aggravation, in a suit for damages actual and exemplary, do not give character to the suit. That which is claimed in the petition and prayer for relief must determine the character of the suit, and the court which has jurisdiction. That a question of title to land may in-, cidentally arise in the suit will not deprive the county court of jurisdiction in a suit for damages. In this case, the plaintiff, under the allegations in his petition, showed a perfect right of action, no. matter to whom the land upon which the trespass was committed belonged, nor does the question as to the title to the land affect his right of recovery except as matter of mitigation or aggravation of exemplary damages. This court has repeatedly held that in suits for damages the county court would not be deprived of jurisdiction because title to land was merely incidentally involved in such suits. [3 W. Con. Rep. § 82; 2 W. Con. Rep. §§ 433, 541, 568; W. & W. Con. Rep. §§ 579, 1131.]

January 29, 1887.

Eeversed and remanded.
#### John J. CARROLL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D11-2320.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 28, 2011.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 18, 2011.

John J. Carroll, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, LAGOA, SALTER, JJ.

*1119On Petition for Belated Appeal

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s petition for belated appeal is hereby granted. The sentence under review is affirmed. *Lecroy v. State,*954 So.2d 747 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Affirmed.