alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         218,234
<SECURITIES>                                   188,354
<RECEIVABLES>                                  421,641
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (30,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    496,432
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,529,804
<PP&E>                                       1,589,804
<DEPRECIATION>                               (455,985)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,412,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,805,201
<BONDS>                                         34,977
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,225
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,561,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,412,287
<SALES>                                      2,913,429
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,913,429
<CGS>                                        2,116,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,116,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,282,943
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,530,227)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,530,227)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,530,227)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.82)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LHS GROUP INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          86,888
<SECURITIES>                                    49,009
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,988
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               241,947
<PP&E>                                          41,362
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,413
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 280,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           583
<OTHER-SE>                                     207,435
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   208,018
<SALES>                                        262,596
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               262,596
<CGS>                                           89,383
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  205,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,844
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,622
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,189
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,433
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65


</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 AF releases 2016 promotion statistics by AFSCPublished Oct. 3, 2016
                        
                        By Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force officials have released the 2016 staff sergeant, technical sergeant and master sergeant promotion statistics, broken down by Air Force specialty code and promotion recommendation. 
In an effort to provide transparency to Airmen, the data has been posted to the myPers website by five-letter AFSC. AFSCs in which all eligible Airmen received the same promotion recommendation, and were selected for promotion, were not included so that the personal identities and promotion recommendations of selectees cannot be gleaned from the report. Additionally, to protect the privacy interests of Airmen, data for AFSCs with subpopulations have been rolled up and incorporated into the five-letter AFSCs.
Beginning in 2014, the enlisted evaluation system underwent significant changes with the focus on making duty performance the driving factor in performance evaluations. In the new system, commanders allocate promotion recommendations (do not promote, not ready now, promote, must promote and promote now) to promotion-eligible senior airmen, staff sergeants and technical sergeants. 
The released data encompasses the first round of promotions since the EES overhaul took place. With only one year’s worth of data, the Air Force has a limited ability to analyze any trends thus far in the new program. As the Air Force progresses through the second and third forced distribution cycles, analysis will identify any trends and determine if any changes are required. 
The AFSC lists can be found on myPers from any component’s enlisted promotions landing page. Under Promotion Cycle Information, click Promotion Selects and Statistics and select the CY16 links.
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to the myPers website. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following the instructions on the Air Force Retirees Services website.AFPC 



Randolph AFB 



AFSC 



enlisted promotion
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
           AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003 of Hartford Life, Inc. (the "Company"), filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 as enacted by section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.

                     /s/ Lizabeth H. Zlatkus
                     ----------------------------------------------
                     Name: Lizabeth H. Zlatkus
                     Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                     Date: March 1, 2004
#### In the Matter of John Kaminsky on Habeas Corpus.1

*Bastardy proceedings*— Detroit *House of Correction*— County *jail.*

1. The confinement of a party found to be the father of an illegitimate child in the Detroit House of Correction, until he shall execute the statutory bond for its support, is illegal.

2. The following propositions are summarized from the opinion of Mr. Justice Campbell:

a — The Detroit House of Correction is a prison for the confinement of persons convicted of offenses, and no one can be confined there except in pursuance of some express statute.

b — The only house of *detention*recognized by our laws is the county jail.

c — The bastardy statute does not provide for imprisonment as a punishment, but only as a detention until the person adjudged to be the father shall give the proper bond; and it is subject to the same condition as in civil cases under the non-imprisonment act, so as to put the party on the footing of an imprisoned debtor, entitled to discharge from custody on complying with the insolvent laws.

*654
      *Habeas corpus*case.

Submitted June 12, 1888.

Prisoner discharged on same day, and opinion filed June 21, 1888.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Oscar M. Springer*and *F. A. Balcer,*for petitioner.

*Moses*Taggart, Attorney General, for the people.

See *People v. Kaminsky,*73 Mich. (41 N. W. Rep. 833).

Campbell, J.

Petitioner, having been found to be the father of an illegitimate child, was ordered to pay certain money for its support, and to give bond to the superintendents of the poor of Wayne county to indemnify them against the infant’s becoming a charge on the county. The order further required him to be imprisoned in the House of Correction of Detroit till he should give such bond or be legally discharged. This confinement is claimed to be illegal.

The House of Correction is a prison for the confinement of persons convicted of offenses. No one can be received into it except in pursuance of some express statute. How. Stat. § 9843. No such law exists on the subject of bastardy. The laws covering that subject do not provide for imprisonment as a punishment, but only as a detention until the person adjudged to be the father shall give the proper bond. Section 2008. The imprisonment is subject to the same condition as in civil cases under the non-imprisonment act, so as to put him on the footing of an imprisoned debtor, entitled to discharge from custody on complying with the insolvent laws. Section 2009. And the superintendents of the poor may at any time compromise, and discharge him from liability. Section 2014.

. The only house of detention recognized by our laws is the county jail. The house of correction was never designed to hold persons who could at any time entitle themselves. to a discharge, and it has no legal facilities for such a purpose. *655Ifc is a place of punishment, and not a place of confinement generally.

The confinement is illegal, and the prisoner must be discharged.

The other Justices concurred.

*656L
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          20,357
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                       313
<INVENTORY>                                     14,437
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,748
<PP&E>                                         202,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,105
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,347
<BONDS>                                              0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,765
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (17,496)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   236,556
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               491,533
<CGS>                                          389,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  452,602
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,592
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,802
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,802
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (12,745)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,943)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>   
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CURRENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR
ACCOMPANYING NOTES THERETO.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Nov. 4Published Nov. 4, 2016
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Cory Kuttler
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- On this look around the Air Force Airmen help fight fires in Iraq; the 48th annual Airlift Tanker Association Convention took place in Nashville, Tennessee; Gen. Hawk Carlisle, the Air Combat Command commander, is inducted into the Order of the Sword; and a hospital on Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, receives an upgrade. Hosted by Airman 1st Class Cory Kuttler. 
For previous episodes, click here.
Related links:
- AMC commander: Airmen, partnerships, technology key to mobility’s future
- James reiterates focus on modernization, efficiencyAMC 



Order of the Sword 



nellis afb 



ACC 



Iraq 



hospital 



ATAF
<PAGE>

                                                                          EX 3.2

[SEAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS]

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE
CORPORATIONS SECTION
P.O. BOX 13697
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-3697

                       ARTICLES/CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION

This correction by the undersigned corporation, limited liability company, or
out-of-state financial institution is submitted pursuant to article 1302-7.01,
Texas Miscellaneous Corporation Laws Act. In the case of a limited partnership,
this certificate of correction is made pursuant to section 2.13, Texas Revised
Limited Partnership Act. The undersigned entity seeks to correct a document
which is an inaccurate record of the entity action, contains an inaccurate or
erroneous statement, or was defectively or erroneously executed, sealed,
acknowledged or verified, and for this purpose states the following.

                                   ARTICLE ONE

The name of the entity is SILVERLEAF RESORTS, INC.

                                  ARTICLE TWO

The document to be corrected is the Third Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation

that was filed in the Office of the Secretary of State on the following date:
December 17,2003

                                  ARTICLE THREE

The inaccuracy, error, or defect to be corrected is:

         Paragraph C of Article II of the Third Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation inaccurately identified a change to ARTICLE ELEVEN of the
company's Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation . The correct reference
should be to ARTICLE TEN.

                                  ARTICLE FOUR

As corrected, the inaccurate, erroneous, or defective portion of the document
reads as follows:

         C. ARTICLE TEN is added to provide that a majority of shareholders may
amend Articles in the future.

                                    Silverleaf Resorts, Inc.

                                    By: /s/ Sandra Cearley, Secretary
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                         Sandra Cearley, Secretary
Exhibit 31.2

Certifications

I, Edward Escudero, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Petro Stopping Centers, L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006                
|                                     
|/s/ Edward Escudero                  
|(Edward Escudero)                    
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trans Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lisa A. Corbitt, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the            Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

/S/ LISA A. CORBITT____

Lisa A. Corbitt

Principal Accounting Officer

August 14, 2008

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### A. G. Breland v. S. E. Barron.

(No. 6052.)

Appeal from McLennan County.

Clark, Dyer & Bolinger, counsel for appellant.

Anderson, Flint & Anderson, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 465. *Marriage of feme sole plaintiff; husband must join in the suit; case stated.*Appellee sued appellant upon a promissory note. At the institution of the suit appellee was a *feme sole,*but pending the suit she married. When the cause was called for trial appellant suggested her marriage and offered evidence in support of the suggestion. Appellee objected because appellant had not pleaded her coverture. The court refused to entertain the suggestion of appellee’s marriage, and rendered judgment in her favor. Appellant reserved a bill of exceptions, and appealed to this court. *Held:*The court erred *565in refusing to entertain the suggestion of appellee’s marriage. If she was a married woman she was not entitled to further prosecute the suit without being joined therein by her husband, or without showing a state of case entitling her to sue as a *feme sole.*While article 1252, Revised Statutes, contemplates that the suggestion of marriage shall be made by the plaintiff, and is for the benefit of the plaintiff, still, if the plaintiff should not make the suggestion, the defendant may make it, and, upon proving the marriage, the suit could proceed no further until the husband was made a party, or cause shown which would entitle the wife to proceed without him.

May 8, 1889.

Reversed and remanded.
#### WILLIAM H. WILSON *v.*ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF EAST LYME

(AC 22362)

(AC 22363)

Bishop, West and Hennessy, Js.

Argued April 29

officially released June 17, 2003

*Fatima T.*Lobo, for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Edward B.*O’Connell, for the appellee (defendant).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

The resolution of these appeals, which concern the identical legal issue, involving the construction of General Statutes 8-3 (d), is controlled by our Supreme Court’s decision in *Wilson*v. *Planning & Zoning*Commission, 260 Conn. 399, 796 A.2d 1187 (2002). In *Wilson*v. *Planning & Zoning Commission,*53 Conn. App. 182, 729 A.2d 791 (1999), this court held that the East Granby planning and zoning commission could *526establish a new effective date for a certain zone change and publish notice before the new effective date. We therefore reversed the trial court’s determination that the commission’s failure of notice rendered its decision null and void. In the present cases, the trial court applied that reasoning with respect to certain actions by the East Lyme zoning commission.

In *Wilson*v. *Planning & Zoning*Commission, supra, 260 Conn. 399, the Supreme Court reversed our decision and determined that the failure to comply with statutory; General Statutes § 8-3 (d); publication requirements rendered the commission’s decision null and void, and that the commission could not retroactively validate an invalid zone change by fixing a new effective date and publishing notice. Id., 405. Although the trial court correctly applied the holding of this court in *Wilson*v. *Planning & Zoning*Commission, supra, 53 Conn. App. 182, the Supreme Court’s subsequent reversal of our judgment requires that we reverse the trial court’s judgments.1

The judgments are reversed and the cases are remanded with direction to render judgments sustaining the appeals and vacating the zone changes in the first case and the amendment to the zoning regulations in the second case.

1

 The trial court rendered its judgments on July 26, 2001.