alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
10.IIIA19 







 




To: Janet Davidson


 
From: Henry Schacht


 
Date: March 13, 2001


 
Re: Special Retention Bonus


 
 
As we continue with our turnaround, it is critical for us to
remain focused and committed to successfully meet our business challenges. I am confident that we can take our company to new levels of success, and I
am counting on your continued commitment as a key player in making this happen. To reward you for your efforts and dedication, the Board has approved a
special retention bonus for you. The amount of the bonus and the payment terms are outlined in the attachment.


This special retention bonus has only been offered to select Officers, so I ask
that you keep the details of this award confidential.


I truly appreciate your efforts and look forward to working together through the
challenges ahead.


 
 
 
 
Attachment











Attachment



Special Retention Bonus
 Janet Davidson



	

Amount
	
You are eligible to receive a retention bonus in the amount of $2,500,000.
 This award is subject to any applicable tax and is
non-benefit bearing for purposes of Lucent’s benefit plans. Please note that this award is in addition to any other incentive awards for which you
may be eligible.


	

Payment
Dates
	

Assuming your continued employment, the following payments will be made:
 •  50% is payable on February 1, 2002

• 50% is payable on December 1, 2002


	

Termination
Provisions
	
•  In the event you voluntarily resign or are terminated by Lucent for “Cause” prior to the payout date(s), this
award will be cancelled.
 • In the event of your death or disability prior to the payout date(s), a prorated portion of this award will be
paid to you or your estate.
 • If you are placed on a Company approved leave of absence under the Officer Severance Policy and you are on
this leave on the scheduled payout date(s), then this award will be paid. Please note that the Officer Severance Policy remains in effect in the event
of a Change in Control (as defined by the 1996 Long Term Incentive Program).
 • In the event of a Change in Control (as defined by the
1996 Long Term Incentive Program), this award would continue to be paid on the originally scheduled dates assuming your continued
employment.




 



Lucent Technologies Proprietary (Restricted)
Solely for Authorized Persons
Having a Need to Know Pursuant to Company Instructions
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5055]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Kentucky [Mr. Ward] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. WARD addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viewpoint Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Anthony L. Pane, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

(1)  The Report to which this certification is attached as an exhibit, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |  |     |  |                                                                                       
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  June 5, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ ANTHONY L. PANE

Anthony L. Pane
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
761 A.2d 1115

#### JOHN PAPE FLOOR COVERING, INC. a Pennsylvania Corporation, Audrey M. Pape, and Stacey Pape Tully, Appellants, v. John A. PAPE, Jr., and Sandra S. Pape, husband and wife, Appellees.

Nos. 3, 4 W.D. Appeal Docket 2000.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Oct. 27, 2000.

*359
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 27th day of October 2000, the Motion to Dismiss for Mootness is hereby granted.
Order entered June 4, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00696-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF I. L.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-09-07655

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s May 28, 2013 motion for an order granting him status as 

an indigent for purposes of appeal. We GRANT appellant’s motion. Appellant is considered 

indigent for purposes of the appeal and is allowed to proceed without prepayment of costs.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
580 A.2d 1086

#### IN THE MATTER OF PHILIP J. LIVOLSI, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 25, 1990.

ORDER

PHILIP J. LIVOLSI of BERLIN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PHILIP J. LIVOLSI is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.
Exhibit 21.1


Subsidiaries of Franklin Street Properties Corp.

Name                                                Jurisdiction of Organization
----                                                ----------------------------

FSP Investments LLC                                        Massachusetts

FSP Property Management LLC                                Massachusetts

FSP Holdings LLC                                           Delaware

Essex Lane Associates Limited Partnership                  Massachusetts

FSP Austin N.W. Limited Partnership                        Massachusetts

FSP Blue Ravine Limited Partnership                        Massachusetts

FSP Bollman Place Limited Partnership                      Massachusetts

FSP Gateway Crossing Limited Partnership                   Massachusetts

FSP Hillview Center Limited Partnership                    Massachusetts

FSP Lyberty Way Limited Partnership                        Massachusetts

FSP North Andover Office Park Limited Partnership          Massachusetts

FSP Park Seneca Limited Partnership                        Massachusetts

FSP Piedmont Center Limited Partnership                    Massachusetts

FSP Santa Clara Limited Partnership                        Massachusetts

FSP Silverside Plantation Limited Partnership              Massachusetts

FSP Southfield Centre Limited Partnership                  Massachusetts

FSP Telecom Business Center Limited Partnership            Massachusetts

One Technology Drive Limited Partnership                   Massachusetts

FSP Gael Apartments Limited Partnership                    Texas

FSP Goldentop Technology Center Limited Partnership        California

FSP Merrywood Apartments Limited Partnership               Texas

FSP Park Ten Limited Partnership                           Texas

FSP Timberlake Corp.                                       Delaware

FSP Timberlake East Corp.                                  Delaware

FSP Forest Park IV NC Limited Partnership                  North Carolina

Addison Circle Acquisition Corp.                           Delaware

Collins Crossing Acquisition Corp.                         Delaware

Montague Acquisition Corp.                                 Delaware

Royal Ridge Acquisition Corp.                              Delaware
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Oct. 4Published Oct. 4, 2016
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Jasmine Vanderheyden
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                
**FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- On this look around the Air Force, senior leaders release a memorandum for diversity initiatives, assignments to Turkey become unaccompanied tours and the Air Force raises awareness for cybersecurity. Hosted by Airman 1st Class Jasmine Vanderheyden.For previous episodes, click here.Related links:
AF leaders announce latest diversity inclusion initiatives
Turkey now an unaccompanied, 12-month tour
AF launches yearlong ‘Cyber Secure’ campaignFeatured Videos 



ATAF 



Senior Leaders 



SecAF 



CSAF 



CMSAF 



diversity 



memorandum 



turkey 



unaccompanied 



tours 



cybersecurity 



Cyber Secure
AMENDMENT #1 TO THE 2000 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN



 Exhibit 4.7 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 MATRIXONE, INC. 2000 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
  
 The MatrixOne, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2000 ESPP”) is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	1.	Article 4 of the 2000 ESPP is amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

  
 “The stock subject to the options under the Plan shall be shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued common
stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), or shares of Common Stock reacquired by the Company, including shares purchased in the open market. The aggregate number of shares which may be issued pursuant to the Plan is 2,000,000,
subject to adjustment as provided in Article 12. If any option granted under the Plan shall expire or terminate for any reason without having been exercised in full or shall cease for any reason to be exercisable in whole or in part, the unpurchased
shares subject thereto shall again be available under the Plan.” 
  

	2.	Except as modified hereby, the 2000 ESPP shall remain in full force and effect. 

  

	3.	This amendment, and all previous amendments to the 2000 ESPP, may be memorialized as a separate amendment to the 2000 ESPP, or included in an amended and restated 2000 ESPP.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-25-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-25-2000
<CASH>                                         13,665
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  92,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                   108,776
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              222,668
<PP&E>                                        184,243
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                461,523
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          77,415
<BONDS>                                         9,578
<COMMON>                                      340,140
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  461,523
<SALES>                                       240,906
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              240,906
<CGS>                                         154,488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 217,344
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,267
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,001
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                21,294
<INCOME-TAX>                                    8,092
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            13,202
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   13,202
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.68



</TABLE>
760 A.2d 846

#### In the Matter of Krzysztof L. NOWAK.

No. 608 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 22, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2000, Krzysztof L. Nowak having been disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated December 20, 1999; the said Krzysztof L. Nowak having been directed on August 3, 2000, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is

ORDERED that Krzysztof L. Nowak is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





--------------------------------------------------------------------








In
      connection with the Annual Report of IBSG International, Inc (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Geoffrey
      Birch  Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2001, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




IBSG
                International, IncDate:
                June 13, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Geoffrey
                BirchGeoffrey
              BirchChief
                Accounting Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD GARCIA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

JOHN DOE, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 18-15858 

D.C. No. 1:17-cv-00865-LJO-JLT 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 27, 2018**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Richard Garcia, a New Mexico state prisoner formerly detained in 

California, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 5 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-15858 

2000) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 

1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)). We 

reverse and remand.

Garcia alleged in the complaint that he submitted his grievance 28 days after 

the event at issue, and that the prison improperly rejected his grievance as 

untimely. Because it is not clear from the face of the complaint that Garcia failed 

to exhaust available administrative remedies, sua sponte dismissal of Garcia’s 

action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies was improper at this early 

stage of the proceedings. See Cal. Code Regs. tit. 15, § 3084.8(b) (prisoner “must 

submit the appeal within 30 calendar days of . . . [t]he occurrence of the event or 

the decision being appealed”); Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 214-15 (2007) (sua 

sponte dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is only appropriate 

if, taking the prisoner’s factual allegations as true, the complaint establishes the 

prisoner’s failure to exhaust); Sapp v. Kimbrell, 623 F.3d 813, 823 (9th Cir. 2010)

(holding that “improper screening of an inmate’s administrative grievances renders 

administrative remedies ‘effectively unavailable’ such that exhaustion is not 

required”). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Garcia’s request for the court to order production of prison surveillance 
3 18-15858 

video, set forth in the opening brief, is denied without prejudice to renewing the 

request before the district court on remand.

REVERSED and REMANDED.
583 A.2d 315

#### JOSEPH F. ESKA v. EXXON COMPANY, U.S.A.

January 29, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Point Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) for the three and nine-month periods endedSeptember 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald R. Kiepert, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: November 10, 2003 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Point Therapeutics, Inc. and will be retained by Point Therapeutics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 86-1803.

#### Blatty *v.*New York Times Co. et al.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5625]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 PRAYER

  The Chaplain, Rev. James David Ford, D.D., offered the following 
prayer:
  O gracious God, from whom comes every good thing, we ask that Your 
Spirit lead us along the right way, hold our lives in Your providence, 
direct our minds and enlighten our hearts and heal us and make us 
strong. We begin each day with gratefulness and confidence that any 
anxiety or concern that we may have will be sanctified by Your gifts to 
us and made well by Your presence. May Your renewing Spirit, O God, 
touch the lives of every person, that we will be the people You would 
have us be, and do those good works that honor You and serve people 
everywhere. In Your name, we pray. Amen.

                          ____________________
```
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 60 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 6, 2007 

Received and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the goals of Veterans Educate 

Today’s Students (VETS) Day, and for other purposes. 

Whereas the United States has, in the course of its history, 

fought in many wars and conflicts to defend freedom and 

protect the interests of the Nation; 

Whereas millions of men and women have served the Nation 

in time of need as members of the Armed Forces; 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

HCON 60 RFS 

Whereas the service of veterans has been vital to the Nation, 

and the sacrifices made by veterans and their families 

should not be forgotten with the passage of time; 

Whereas children throughout the Nation would benefit from 

programs that provide education about veterans and that 

instill a patriotic appreciation of the sacrifices made by 

veterans to defend freedom and to protect the interests 

of the Nation; 

Whereas efforts are being made throughout the Nation to devote November 10, or another date as may be designated, 

to an event known as Veterans Educate Today’s Students 

Day; and 

Whereas schools that participate in Veterans Educate Today’s Students Day set aside a portion of the school day 

for the study, recognition, and appreciation of veterans: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress— 

3 (1) recognizes the importance of veterans to the 

4 United States; 

5 (2) expresses support for the goals of Veterans 

6 Educate Today’s Students Day; 

7 (3) urges teachers, civic leaders, and veterans 

8 to carry out programs that educate children about 

9 the service of veterans and the sacrifices made by 

10 veterans and their families; and 

11 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

12 to participate in local and national activities recogVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:11 Nov 07, 2007 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HC60.RFS HC60

cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

HCON 60 RFS 

1 nizing Veterans Educate Today’s Students Day and 

2 other events that foster education about the impor3 tance of veterans to the Nation. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 5, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5555]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Texas [Mr. Gene Green] is recognized for 5 minutes.
  [Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas addressed the House. His remarks will appear 
hereafter in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 89 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S7649]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           ORDER OF PROCEDURE

  Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, it had been our hope that we could have 
appointed conferees today on four major pieces of legislation: Medicare 
select, regulation reform, product liability, and line-item veto. But 
for a number of reasons we are not able to do that today. We hope to be 
able to be in a position to appoint conferees in all four of those 
measures when we return on Monday, June 5. At least we will make the 
effort. If there is objection at that time, the objection will be 
noted.
  We have done all the nominations on the calendar with one exception, 
because I had requests from some of my colleagues that we make certain 
we did that before recess. They have been done.
  I would say it will be my intention now, when we come back on Monday, 
to stay with the terrorism bill at least through Monday to see what 
happens. I apologize to Senators Pressler and Hollings because we 
thought we would go to the telecommunications bill that day, but we did 
lose a day yesterday with the votes. In the last 2 days we had 50-some 
votes. We might have been able to finish the terrorism bill this week. 
So we will make an effort on Monday, June 5, and maybe up through noon 
on Tuesday, and at that point we will see what the situation is, how 
many amendments are remaining, whether or not we can have time 
agreements. But it is still my hope to go to the telecommunications 
bill early the week we are back.

                          ____________________
```