alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-20822

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN GABRIEL ORTUNO-OLEA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:19-CR-168-1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Gabriel Ortuno-Olea appeals his conviction for illegal reentry, in 

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving 

the right to appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. OrtunoOlea asserts that the indictment was invalid because the removal order was 

void due to a defective notice to appear that failed to specify the date and time 

for his removal hearing. He concedes that the issue is foreclosed by United 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 29, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-20822 Document: 00515469407 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/29/2020
No. 19-20822

2

States v. Pedroza-Rocha, 933 F.3d 490 (5th Cir. 2019), cert. denied, 2020 WL 

2515686 (2020)and Pierre-Paul v. Barr, 930 F.3d 684 (5th Cir. 2019), cert. 

denied, 2020 WL 1978950 (U.S. Apr. 27, 2020) (No. 19-779), but he wishes to 

preserve it for further review. The Government has filed a motion for summary 

affirmance, agreeing that the issue is foreclosed under Pedroza-Rocha and 

Pierre-Paul. Alternatively, the Government requests an extension of time to 

file a brief.

In Pedroza-Rocha, we concluded that the notice to appear was not 

rendered deficient because it did not specify a date or time for the removal 

hearing, that any such alleged deficiency had not deprived the immigration 

court of jurisdiction, and that the defendant could not collaterally attack his 

underlying removal order without first exhausting his administrative 

remedies. Pedroza-Rocha, 933 F.3d at 496-98. Because the Government’s 

position “is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial 

question as to the outcome of the case,” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 

406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the Government’s motion for summary 

affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an 

extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 19-20822 Document: 00515469407 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/29/2020
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-1972

___________ Jamie Kaufmann Woods; Shari Lueken, * a minor, by and through her next * friends, Ralph Lueken and Marilyn * Lueken; Marilyn Lueken; Ralph * Lueken; Erika Teasley, a minor, by and * through her next friends, Paul Douglas * Hoover, Jr. and Katrina L. Hoover; * Paul Douglas Hoover, Jr.; Katrina L. * Hoover; Tracey Brazil Ozuna; * Jessica Deboi, * * Appeal from the United States Plaintiffs-Appellants * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Bob Wills, aka Bobby Ray Wills, * aka B. Wills; Betty Sue Wills; * Sam Gerhardt, aka S. L. Gerhardt; * Deborah Gerhardt, aka Debbie * Gerhardt; Julie Gerhardt; Sharon * Goodman; Andrea Hill, dba * Mountain Park Boarding Academy, * * Defendants-Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: April 9, 2007 Filed: June 1, 2007

___________ Before MURPHY, BRIGHT, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________1 The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -2- PER CURIAM. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no error in the trial court’s 1 disposition of this matter. Therefor e, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
583 A.2d 320

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RICHARD J. SPILLANE.

February 13, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Yesterday's Air Force: LuxembourgPublished July 30, 2015
                        
                        By Air Force TV
                
                
**FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** – On July 12, 1944, two U.S. B-17 Flying Fortress bombers collided over the small town of Perle, Luxembourg.
Though 71 years have passed, the event has changed the lives of many people, including Roger Feller, who witnessed the crash.  He has since dedicated his life to never forgetting the American sacrifices of World War II.
Yesterday's Air Force is a history and heritage featurette series that airs every other week, profiling significant people and missions from the Air Force's past.Yesterday’s Air Force 



Luxembourg 



heritage 



WWII 



World War II 



B-17 



B-17 Flying Fortress
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          11,311
<SECURITIES>                                    29,178
<RECEIVABLES>                                       12
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,452
<PP&E>                                           2,055
<DEPRECIATION>                                     283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,607
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,906
<SALES>                                            162
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   162
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,255
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,572)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,887)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,265
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,622)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and the Statements of Consolidated
Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,561
<SECURITIES>                                     5,209
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                       272
<INVENTORY>                                     19,509
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,740
<PP&E>                                          15,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 238,923
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,297
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     211,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   238,923
<SALES>                                         13,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,168
<CGS>                                            9,494
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,235)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,053)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,278)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,775)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,775)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.6

FORCE PROTECTION, INC.
9801 Highway 78, Bldg #3
Ladson, SC 29456


Tel (843) 740-7015
Fax (843) 740-1973
www.forceprotection.net


November 15, 2004

Dear
Scott:

I
am pleased to confirm your employment as part of the Force Protection management team on the following terms:

Title:

General Counsel (Vice President Legal).Scope of duties attached.Compensation:Salary:

$118,000 per year, paid bi-weekly (based on an alternating work schedule of three weeks on and one week off, i.e., 75% of full time.)Benefits:

Health insurance and other benefits according to the Company's standard benefits package in effect from time-to-time.Other:

Relocation Expense of $15,000
500,000 common shares + 4 Series "C"
Performance Bonus at the discretion of the Board of Directors
Eligible for Company Stock Incentive programStart Date:

Aug. 9, 2004


Employment Terms:

Your position will be with Force Protection, Inc. (jointly with its subsidiary Technical Solutions Group, Inc. referred
to as the "Company") and you will have a primary office at the Company's facility in Ladson, South Carolina, it being understood and agreed that you will have also have the discretion to perform your
duties from your office in Austin Texas.

In
consideration of your employment, you agree to the following:



---





We
are extremely pleased to confirm this offer and look forward to your contribution to our Company. If the foregoing is acceptable to you, I would ask that you kindly sign below and
return a copy of this letter to me.

Regards,

Sincerely
yours,

/s/ GALE AGUILAR
Force Protection, Inc.

Accepted and Agreed:By:

/s/ R. SCOTT ERVINName: R. Scott Ervin


---



Scope of Duties  General Counsel

The General Counsel shall report to the Board of Directors and the CEO.

The
scope of duties for your position shall include managing the Company's legal affairs (and those of its affiliates and subsidiaries),
including:



---





QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1043]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           THE NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT AND ECONOMIC CONVERSION ACT

                                 ______

                       HON. ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON

                      of the district of columbia

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 16, 1995
  Ms. NORTON. Mr. Speaker, in this time of budget rescissions and 
cutting of social programs, I am reintroducing a bill that would aid us 
in refocusing the debate on funding priorities. The Nuclear Disarmament 
and Economic Conversion Act, which is designed to take effect when all 
foreign countries possessing nuclear weapons enact and execute similar 
legal requirements, requires the United States to disable and dismantle 
its nuclear weapons and to refrain from replacing them with weapons of 
mass destruction. In addition, the bill proposes refocusing resources 
that are currently being used for nuclear programs to address human 
needs such as housing, health care, education, agriculture, and 
environmental restoration.
  The Nuclear Disarmament and Economic Conversion Act is consistent 
with current U.S. policy and moves us to the next logical level by 
redirecting resources to essential domestic needs. The disarmament 
contemplated by this legislation is not unilateral on the part of the 
United States but requires multilateral cooperation to rid the world of 
nuclear weapons.
  During the first 100 days of this Congress, many crucial programs 
were put on the chopping block--money for summer jobs for youth and 
future levels of funding for school lunches for our children. Yet, with 
the end of the cold war already making it into our children's text 
books, we have not yet refocused our priorities, nor reallocated our 
precious resources toward our most precious resource of all--our 
children. This act is a step toward that end.

                          ____________________
```
H. J. Res. 93 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

Joint Resolution 

Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese Freedom 

and Democracy Act of 2003. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. RENEWAL OF IMPORT RESTRICTIONS UNDER THE BURMESE FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY ACT OF 2003. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Congress approves the renewal of the import 

restrictions contained in section 3(a)(1) of the Burmese Freedom 

and Democracy Act of 2003. 

(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—This joint resolution shall be 

deemed to be a ‘‘renewal resolution’’ for purposes of section 9 

of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003. 

SEC. 2. CERTAIN COBRA FEES. 

Section 13031(j)(3)(B)(i) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget 

Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(j)(3)(B)(i)) is amended 

by striking ‘‘September 30, 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘October 7, 2017’’. 

SEC. 3. TIME FOR PAYMENT OF CORPORATE ESTIMATED TAXES. 

The percentage under subparagraph (C) of section 401(1) of 

the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 in 

effect on the date of the enactment of this Act is increased by 

0.25 percentage points. 

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

This joint resolution and the amendments made by this joint 

resolution shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this 

joint resolution or July 26, 2008, whichever occurs first. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Department of the United States Air Force LogoBiography
                  United States Air ForceQusi R. Al-Haj
            QUSI R. AL-HAJQusi R. Al-Haj is the Special Assistant to the Deputy Undersecretary of the Air Force for International Affairs, Washington D.C. He advises the Air Force’s senior civilian official charged with providing oversight and guidance for international policy and programs supporting national security objectives through politico-military affairs; security assistance programs; technology and information disclosure; education and training; cooperative research and development; management of the Air Force Foreign Liaison Office and attaché affairs.

Prior to assuming his current position, Mr. Al-Haj served as U.S. Senator John Thune’s (R-SD) Regional Director and Senior Aide from 2005 to 2017. He wasresponsible for overseeing all aspects of operations related to U.S. Senate business in 22 counties in Western South Dakota, and for developing and implementing policy objectives strategies and directing all activities and staff in the senator’s regional office.

Mr. Al-Haj’s support of the Air Force started prior to his federal service. As a businessman and political/civic leader, he was involved withEllsworth Air Force Base for over 7 years as Honorary Commander and member of a task force dedicated to strengthening the installation and synchronizing advocacy efforts at the local, state and federal level. As a Congressional Aide, Ellsworth AFB was a top priority in his portfolio for 13 years. Participation in Air Force sponsored National Security Forums and visits to many installations offered him insight into the U.S. Air Force global role and related challenges.

**EDUCATION**

1983 Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering, University of Missouri, Rolla

1990 Masters of Science, Electrical Engineering /Digital Electronics Design, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota



**CAREER CHRONOLOGY**

1984-1986,Mandatory service in the Jordanian Army, Mutah, Jordan

1988-1989,Research and Development Engineer, Dakota Research Corp, Rapid City, S.D.

1989-1991,Systems Engineer, Tandy Corporation, Rapid City, S.D.

1990-1994,University Instructor, South Dakota State University, Ellsworth AFB, S.D.

1991-2005, President / Owner, Micro solutions Computer Firm, Rapid City, S.D.

2000-2001,University Instructor, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology, S.D.

2005-2017, United States senate,****Regional Director and Senior Aide, United States Senator John Thune, Rapid City, S.D.

2017-present, Special Assistant to the Deputy Undersecretary of the Air Force for International Affairs, Washington, D.C.



(Current as of January 2018)Department of the Air Force Logo
Exhibit 10.79  AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT  This Amendment No. 2
(this Amendment), dated as of January 12, 2009, amends that
certain Severance Agreement (the Agreement) entered into on April 4,
2008, by and between Force Protection, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company),
and Daniel Busher (the Executive).  WHEREAS, in order to correct a scriveners error in
the language in Section 5 of the Agreement, the Company and the Executive
desire to enter into this Amendment to amend certain provisions of the
Agreement.  NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in
consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants and agreements in the
Agreement and herein, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows:  1.Capitalized Terms. 
Capitalized terms that are not defined in this Amendment shall have the
meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement.  2.Section 5 of the Agreement is amended in
its entirety to read as follows:  5.            
Payments Upon Non-Qualifying Termination of
Employment.If
the Executives employment with the Company shall terminate by reason of a
Nonqualifying Termination, then the Company shall pay to the Executive (or the
Executives beneficiary or estate) within thirty (30) days following the Date
of Termination, a lump-sum cash amount equal to the Accrued Amounts (other than
the amount described in Section 3(a)(ii) if the Executive is
terminated by the Company for Cause) and provide the Other Benefits.  3.Counterparts.  This
Amendment may be executed (including by facsimile transmission confirmed
promptly thereafter by actual delivery of executed counterparts) in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.  4.Governing Law.  This
Amendment shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with,
the internal laws of the State of South Carolina without regard to the
principle of conflicts of laws.  5.Headings.  Section headings
are for convenience only and shall not be considered a part of this Amendment.


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Company and the Executive have caused this Amendment No. 2 to be executed,
effective as of the date first written above.   FORCE
  PROTECTION, INC.By:
  /s/
  Lenna Ruth MacdonaldName: Lenna Ruth MacdonaldTitle: Chief Strategy Officer, General
  Counsel & Corporate SecretaryEXECUTIVEBy:
  /s/
  Daniel BusherName:
  Daniel BusherTitle:
  Executive Vice President, Operations
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: June 10Published June 10, 2016
                        
                        By Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- On this look around the Air Force the secretary of the Air Force shares a  Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Pride Month message and B-52 Stratofortresses from Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, kick things off at Baltic Operations 16. Hosted by Tech. Sgt. Holly Roberts-Davis.
For previous episodes, click here.
Related links:James on LGBT Pride Month: ‘Now is the time; let’s celebrate’Minot B-52s begin Baltops 16 flying opATAF 



SecAF 



LGBT 



Pride Month 



Baltops 16 



RAF Fairford 



Minot 



B-52 



AFGSC
#### Steven W. RICHARDSON v. GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY.

No. 2010-C-2473.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 17, 2010.

In re Government Employees Insurance Co.; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. 0, No. 559,997; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 0208.

Denied.