alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 186 (Monday, September 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59226-59227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24051]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XZ25

Fisheries of the South Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean; 
Southeastern Data, Assessment, and Review (SEDAR); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of SEDAR Steering Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The SEDAR Steering Committee will meet to discuss the SEDAR 
assessment schedule, budget, and the SEDAR process. See SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION.

DATES: The SEDAR Steering Committee will meet on Tuesday, October 5 
through Thursday, October 7, 2010. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for 
specific dates and times.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Embassy Suites Historic 
Charleston, 337 Meeting Street, Charleston, SC 29403. telephone: (843) 
723-6900.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Carmichael, SEDAR Program 
Manager, SEDAR/SAFMC, 4055 Faber Place, Suite

[[Page 59227]]

201, North Charleston, SC 29405; telephone: (843) 571-4366 or toll 
free: (866) SAFMC-10; fax: (843) 769-4520.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The South Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and 
Caribbean Fishery Management Councils; in conjunction with NOAA 
Fisheries, the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, and the 
Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission; implemented the Southeast 
Data, Assessment and Review (SEDAR) process, a multi-step method for 
determining the status of fish stocks. The SEDAR Steering Committee 
meets regularly to provide oversight of the SEDAR process, establish 
assessment priorities, and provide coordination between assessment 
efforts and management activities.
    During this meeting the Steering Committee will receive reports on 
recent SEDAR activities, consider benchmark and update assessment 
scheduling for 2011-15, and discuss the SEDAR budget and process.

Meeting Schedule:

October 5, 2010: 1 p.m. - 5 p.m.

October 6, 2010: 9 a.m. - 5 p.m.

October 7, 2010: 9 a.m. - 3 p.m.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to the South Atlantic Fishery 
Management Council office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) at 
least 7 business days prior to the meeting.

    Dated: September 21, 2010.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-24051 Filed 9-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1390 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1390

 To require Senate confirmation of an individual appointed to serve as 
           the Director of the American Institute in Taiwan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2007

Mr. Tancredo (for himself and Mr. Rohrabacher) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require Senate confirmation of an individual appointed to serve as 
           the Director of the American Institute in Taiwan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENATE CONFIRMATION REQUIRED OF AN INDIVIDUAL APPOINTED TO 
              SERVE AS DIRECTOR OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE IN TAIWAN.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the 
Senate, an individual to serve as the Director of the American 
Institute in Taiwan.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect beginning with 
the first appointment by the President of an individual to serve as the 
Director of the American Institute in Taiwan that is made after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5684]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Lipinski] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. LIPINSKI addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1256 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1256

    To amend title 5, United States Code, to increase the level of 
 Government contributions under the Federal employees health benefits 
                                program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2007

  Mr. Hoyer (for himself and Mr. Wolf) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 5, United States Code, to increase the level of 
 Government contributions under the Federal employees health benefits 
                                program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 8906(b) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``72'' and inserting 
        ``80''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``75'' and inserting 
        ``83''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to each contract year beginning after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4977]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

REPORT ON RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF S. 219, REGULATORY 
                         TRANSITION ACT OF 1995

  Mr. GOSS, from the Committee on Rules, submitted a privileged report 
(Rept. No. 104-122) on the resolution (H. Res. 148) providing for 
consideration of the bill (S. 219) to improve the economy and 
efficiency of Federal Government operations by establishing a 
moratorium on regulatory rulemaking actions, and for other purposes, 
which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed.

                          ____________________
```
#### Matthew FELIX, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D11-606.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 8, 2011.

Matthew Felix, Cross City, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Based on Newly Discovered Evidence in case number 96-CF-3528-A, in the Circuit Court in and for *390Seminole County, Florida. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

TORPY, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
10.24

    


    Summary of Loan
Agreement

     

    Loan from Shuangyang Rural
Credit

     

    
       On May
12, 2007, Taihong entered into a loan agreement with Shuangyang Rural Credit.
Pursuant to such loan agreement, Shuangyang Rural Credit loaned Taihong $948,199
at an interest rate of 8.76% per annum on all outstanding principal. Taihong is
obligated under such loan agreement to pay interest monthly and repay the loan
on its maturity date, October 12, 2008. We use the loan to finance the purchase
of raw materials. The loan is secured by the plant and equipment of Taihong with
a net book value of $1,121,949 as of September 30, 2008. There are no material
covenants, conditions or restrictions in Taihong’s loan agreements with
Shuangyang Rural Credit.
#### W. *F.*Whittington v. E. Eppstein & Co.

(No. 5694.)

Appeal from Cooke County.

Sarlls & Greene, counsel for appellant.

Davis & Garnett and W. B. Johnson, counsel for appellees.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 369. *Appeal from justice’s to county court;*urrit*ten pleadings need not be noted on justice’s docket.*Appellees sued appellant in justice’s court upon a verified account. Appellant pleaded in writing, denying under oath the justness of the account, and setting up the statute of limitations. Appellant recovered judgment in justice’s court for costs. On appeal to the county court by appellees the written pleadings of appellant were sent up with the original papers in the cause, but the transcript of the justice did not show that appellant had made any defense in said justice’s court. The county court, on the trial, refused to allow appellant to read his written pleadings, or introduce evidence in support of the same, because his defenses had not been noted and entered upon the justice’s docket. [R. S. arts. 1550, subd. 4, 1573.] *Held:*In Mass v. Solinskey, 67 Tex. 290, our supreme court, construing the articles of the statute above cited, and article 1640, together, say: “Tn a case originating in justice’s court the, cause of action must be shown by the entries made in the justice’s docket, *by pleadings filed in the case,*if any, or by an agreed case.” The same rule is applicable to defenses. The original papers are required to be sent up with the j ustice’s transcript, and, when sent up, are a part of the record on appeal, as much so as the transcript. Appel*441lant’s defenses made in writing in the justice’s court should have been heard, and considered in the county, court on appeal, and said court erred in ruling otherwise.

April 18, 1888.

Reversed and remanded.
#### D. A. Aiken v. Richard Kennedy.

(No. 833, Op. Book No. 2, p. 405.)

Error from Anderson County.

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 1321. *In the trial of the right of*property, *where the value assessed by the officer is not put in issue nor*attacked, *it is not error to adopt his valuation in rendering judgment.*It is claimed for error in the judgment that the judge failed to find the value of the property levied on. There was no special issue made on the value of the iron. The value was assessed by the sheriff on the claim bond, as the statute required him to do. The correctness of his assessment was not attacked. It was virtually acquiesced in, and the judge might properly adopt it as the rule in rendering judgment. [Wright v. Henderson, 12 Tex. 45; Ratcliff v. Hicks, 23 Tex. 174.] The cases cited were decided under the act of 1848 for the trial of the right of property, but the Revised Statutes do not differ in this respect from the provisions of that act.

§ 1322. *Mechanics’ liens; the proper remedy for the enforcement of.*The writ of attachment and the statutory action for the trial of the right of property is not the proper remedy for the protection and enforcement of liens. Notwithstanding the lien, the property may be sold and delivered subject to it; the lien holder is not the owner of the property. If Kennedy sought to establish a lien upon the iron or the bridge, the appropriate remedy would have been by sequestration or his suit against the company, in which the matter could have been adjudi*771catecl. Whether he has a mechanic’s lien upon the iron attached is not properly in issue in this case. [Tyler Tap R. R. Co. v. Driscol, 52 Tex. 16.]

October 19, 1880.

Eeversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
acompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,907
<SECURITIES>                                    26,085
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,149
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        455
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,165
<PP&E>                                           5,424
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,473
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,486
<SALES>                                          6,248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,248
<CGS>                                              838
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,847
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    116
<INCOME-TAX>                                        35
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 81
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        81
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 

### OmCIAL BUSINESS.^^ra,;»uMvj» J* % 

## STATE©FTEXAS* cp< PENALTYFOR./v-""*rf PRIVATE USE 5? «^* ' ^Sas^nDfy^Bs^^B
A"** JO, 

# 1/28/2015 '^•-^•-^-'J^ t||} TM GONZALES, JOHN EDWARD^FTr/C^No;95962TOT 0 2 1M 0004279596 

# ^LEDFROM^PCg^^v-X;, WTNEV BOWES
JAN 29 2015 -/i 

### % This is to advise that the Court has'denied without written order the application for writ of habeas corpus on the findings:ofthe trial-court without a hearing. i-^5V>*
JOHN EDWARD GONZALES kTDC #1241742 Abel Acosta, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000920273
<NAME> UPLAND ENERGY CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         211,173
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               228,934
<PP&E>                                       1,110,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,349,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,481
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,331,030
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,003,835)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,349,676
<SALES>                                         80,632
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,351
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  387,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (284,286)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (284,286)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         110,737
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  324,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,017,236
<PP&E>                                          80,052
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,252,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,127,433
<BONDS>                                      1,757,813
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,366,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,252,242
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               363,596
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               265,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 98,135
<INCOME-TAX>                                    41,810
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             56,325
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,325
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Fort Worth & Denver City R’y Co. v. Burton.

(No. —-.)

Appeal fronl Tarrant County.

*{Transferred from Austin.)*

J. M. O’Neill, counsel for appellant.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 193. *Suit for damages for frightening g team, etc.; evidence tohich did not show a cause of action; case*stated. This suit was instituted iñ a justice’s court, and from thence was appealed to the county court. In this latter court, plaintiff amended his cause of action as follows, viz.: “ Plaintiff claims from the defendant the sum of $200 damages to him by said defendant, a corporation duly incorporated, and operating a railroad in said county, through its lawful employees and agents, on or about May 20, 1889", negligently, carelessly and unlawfully operating an engine on its railroad track, causing plaintiff’s horse to become frightened and run away, to its injury, and causing plaintiff to be frightened and injured, and'therefore asks judgment against defendant for the sum of $200 damages, and costs of suit.” On the trial, judgment was rendered for plaintiff for $100 and costs.

We are of the opinion the evidence does not support the judgment, or show any cause of action on the part of plaintiff. In substance, it appears that plaintiff’s team was driven between a switch track and the main track of the road, when the train came down the main track and stopped, leaving the engine near the crossing of the road on which plaintiff was traveling, but not obstructing the crossing. Plaintiff’s team was frightened át the engine. An ox team accompanying plaintiff’s horse team did cross safely in front of the *engine,*and *293plaintiff’s horse team followed, though they were badly-frightened, and though they could, according to plaintiff’s witness Duval, have been turned round and gone back without crossing in front of the engine. As it was, they were driven in front of the engine, and ran away because the horses were frightened at the engine. As to the proof of his injuries and damages, the plaintiff himself testified, on cross-examination: “Neither my horse nor myself were hurt or injured, except by fright. My wife and a part of my children were in the wagon with me, but got out before the accident occurred. I do not know how much the horse was worth, or how much he was damaged. I do not know how much I was damaged.” The evidence wholly fails to support the judgment, and in our opinion it fails to establish any cause of action.

January 14, 1891.

Reversed and remanded.
**Exhibit
      23.1**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





Silverleaf
      Resorts, Inc


Dallas,
      Texas




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos. 333-83771 and 333-118474) and in the Registration Statement on Form
      S-3 (No. 333-134888) of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. of our report dated March
      13,
      2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this
      Annual Report on Form 10-K.







BDO
      Seidman, LLP


Dallas,
      Texas


March
      13,
      2007