alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 137 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.137

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to strengthen prohibitions 
            against animal fighting, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Animal Fighting Prohibition 
Enforcement Act of 2007''.
SEC. 2. ENFORCEMENT OF ANIMAL FIGHTING PROHIBITIONS.
    (a) In General.--Chapter 3 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 49. Enforcement of animal fighting prohibitions
    ``Whoever violates subsection (a), (b), (c), or (e) of section 26 
of the Animal Welfare Act shall be fined under this title, imprisoned 
for not more than 3 years, or both, for each violation.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents for such chapter is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 48 the 
following:

``49. Enforcement of animal fighting prohibitions.''.
SEC. 3. AMENDMENTS TO THE ANIMAL WELFARE ACT.
    Section 26 of the Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2156) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (c), by striking ``interstate 
    instrumentality'' and inserting ``instrumentality of interstate 
    commerce for commercial speech'';
        (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``such subsections'' and 
    inserting ``such subsection'';
        (3) by striking subsection (e) and inserting the following:
    ``(e) It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly sell, buy, 
transport, or deliver in interstate or foreign commerce a knife, a 
gaff, or any other sharp instrument attached, or designed or intended 
to be attached, to the leg of a bird for use in an animal fighting 
venture.'';
        (4) in subsection (g)--
            (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``or animals, such as 
        waterfowl, bird, raccoon, or fox hunting''; and
            (B) by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following:
        ``(3) the term `instrumentality of interstate commerce' means 
    any written, wire, radio, television or other form of communication 
    in, or using a facility of, interstate commerce;''; and
        (5) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) The criminal penalties for violations of subsection (a), (b), 
(c), or (e) are provided in section 49 of title 18, United States 
Code.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 14 , 2024

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 24

- 00217

- CV

THOMAS MOCCIA , Appellant

V. BRI HOLCOMBE, BANK OF AMERICA N.A, AND CODI WELCH , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 23

- DCV

- 311149

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from order s signed March 4, 2024 and March 8,
2024 . Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v.
Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until final judgment is rendered unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson , 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc.2

v. Tipps , 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). The orders being appealed are interlocutory because they do not dispose of all pending parties and there is no statutory exception allowing for an appeal.

On April 17
, 2024, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for contin uing the appeal on or before April 29,
2024. See Tex. R. App

. P . 42.3(a). Appellant’s response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over the appeal. Additionally, appellees Bank of America N.A. and Codi Welch and appellee Bri Holcombe have filed motions to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss those motions as moot and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Spain and Poissant.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1384 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1384

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 118 Minner Avenue in Bakersfield, California, as the ``Buck Owens Post 
                                Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. BUCK OWENS POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 118 Minner Avenue in Bakersfield, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Buck Owens Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Buck Owens 
Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
583 A.2d 337

#### PEDRO CARRASQUILLO AND ANNA CARRASQUILLO, ETC. v. DREIS & KRUMP MANUFACTURING COMPANY.

March 7, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 KC-46 refuels fighter jet with hose, drogue system for first timePublished Feb. 16, 2016
                        
                        By Kenji Thuloweit
                        
                        
                        412th Test Wing Public Affairs
                **EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFNS) --**
                An Air Force and Boeing aircrew aboard a KC-46A Pegasus successfully refueled an F/A-18 Hornet fighter jet in flight Feb. 10, marking the program’s first using the tanker’s hose and drogue system.
The flight, which took place in the skies over Washington state, lasted more than four hours and the tanker's air refueling operator transferred fuel to the F/A-18 at 20,000 feet, according to Boeing officials.
The KC-46 will refuel aircraft using both its boom, and hose and drogue systems. The boom allows the tanker to transfer up to 1,200 gallons of fuel per minute, while the plane's hose and drogue systems, located on both the plane's wing and centerline, enables the KC-46 to refuel smaller aircraft such as the F/A-18 with up to 400 gallons of fuel per minute, a Boeing news release said.
F/A-18s are flown by both the Navy and Marine Corps.
The KC-46 refueled an F-16C Fighting Falcon from Edwards Air Force Base using its air refueling boom Jan. 24.
The KC-46 is intended to replace the Air Force's aging tanker fleet, which has been refueling aircraft for more than 50 years. With more refueling capacity and enhanced capabilities, improved efficiency and increased capabilities for cargo and aeromedical evacuation, the KC-46 will provide aerial refueling support to the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps, as well as coalition aircraft.
The 412th Test Wing is the lead developmental test organization for the KC-46 tanker program.KC-46 



refueling 



tanker 



Edwards AFB Related Links
        KC-46A Pegasus
                                Feb. 1, 2016
                                The KC-46A is the first phase in recapitalizing the U.S. Air Force's aging tanker fleet. With greater refueling, cargo and aeromedical evacuation capabilities compared to the KC-135, the KC-46A will provide aerial refueling support to Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and partner-nation receivers.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         147,795
<SECURITIES>                                    30,694
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,011
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,549
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               256,568
<PP&E>                                          70,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,505
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 308,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,064
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       211,697
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   308,668
<SALES>                                        255,997
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               255,997
<CGS>                                          116,768
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  116,768
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                98,890
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,886
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,869
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,371
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  3,494
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,865
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .88
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1101 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1101

 To provide for the payment of certain annuities under section 376 of 
         title 28, United States Code, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2007

  Mr. Snyder introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the payment of certain annuities under section 376 of 
         title 28, United States Code, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF CERTAIN JUDICIAL SURVIVOR ANNUITIES.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 376(h) of title 28, 
United States Code, shall not apply with respect to the payment of an 
annuity to any individual described under subsection (b) of this 
section, which would otherwise be payable (but for the operation of 
such paragraph).
    (b) Individuals.--An individual referred to under subsection (a) is 
any individual who--
            (1) became a widow on the death of her spouse on July 14, 
        1987;
            (2) was remarried on October 20, 1990; and
            (3) again became a widow on the death of her spouse on 
        February 11, 2004.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect as of October 20, 1990.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Theodore Abajian, Chief Financial Officer of CKE Restaurants, Inc. (the
Company), certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
May 17, 2004, of the Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and
34-47986];c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls over financial reporting. Date: December 17, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Theodore AbajianTheodore AbajianChief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32
 *
  (i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
       
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as required by Section 906, is
not deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to the
rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said
Act.
583 A.2d 336

#### MADELINE R. SUTLEY v. DENISON DRIVE CORPORATION AND FRAME TECH, INC.

March 7, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
030910-F-JZ509-475.JPG
            W. STUART SYMINGTON**Served as secretary of the Air Force from Sept. 18, 1947 to April 24, 1950**
W. Stuart Symington was the first secretary of the Air Force. He had previously served from Jan. 3, 1946, as assistant secretary of war for air when the Army Air Force was a part of the War Department. 
Symington was born in 1901 at Amherst, Mass. After graduation from Baltimore City College in 1918, Symington enlisted in the Army as a private, and at 17 became one of the Army's youngest second lieutenants. 
After World War I, Symington entered Yale University, and graduated with a bachelor of arts degree. He received an honorary degree of doctor of laws from Baylor University, Waco, Texas, Feb. 1, 1950. 
In 1923, Symington went to work for an uncle in the shops of the Symington Company of Rochester, N.Y., manufacturers of malleable iron products. Two years later he formed Eastern Clay Products, Inc., but in 1927 returned to the Symington Company as executive assistant to the president. 
Symington resigned in 1930 to become president of the Colonial Radio Corporation, now a manufacturing division of Sylvania Electric Products. In January 1935, he accepted the presidency of Rustless Iron and Steel Corporation, manufactures of stainless steel, but remained director of Colonial Radio Corporation. 
When Rustless Iron and Steel Corporation was sold to the American Rolling Mill Company in 1937, Symington resigned and in 1938, accepted the presidency of Emerson Electric Manufacturing Company of St. Louis. 
Early in 1941, at the request of the Army, the Navy and the Office of Production Management, Symington went to England with a group of aeronautical engineers to study the new type of guns on military planes. He returned in June 1941, to build the world's largest airplane armament plant as part of the Emerson Company in St. Louis. The company produced great quantities of power-driven turrets to provide American bombers with protective firepower. 
Symington's varied industrial experience and his company's war production record led to his appointment as chairman of the original three-member Surplus Property Board on July 16, 1945. On Oct. 1, 1945, when Congress created the Surplus Property Administration, Symington was named administrator. The task of this organization was to formulate the policies under which government agencies disposed of the tremendous surplus of war properties.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CALVIN MOORE, III,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 65 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of December, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1239 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1239

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the National Underground Railroad Network to Freedom Act of 
  1998 to authorize additional funding to carry out the Act, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Underground Railroad 
Network to Freedom Amendments Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZING APPROPRIATIONS FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES.

    The National Underground Railroad Network to Freedom Act of 1998 
(16 U.S.C. 469l et seq.) is amended--
            (1) by striking section 3(d);
            (2) by striking section 4(d); and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``(a) Amounts.--There are authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this Act $2,500,000 for each fiscal year, to be allocated as 
follows:
            ``(1) $2,000,000 is to be used for the purposes of section 
        3.
            ``(2) $500,000 is to be used for the purposes of section 4.
    ``(b) Restrictions.--No amounts may be appropriated for the 
purposes of this Act except to the Secretary for carrying out the 
responsibilities of the Secretary as set forth in this Act.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 2 shall take effect at the beginning 
of the fiscal year immediately following the date of the enactment of 
this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1239

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the National Underground Railroad Network to Freedom Act of 
  1998 to authorize additional funding to carry out the Act, and for 
                            other purposes.
```