alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### F. H. Bayne et al. v. Samuel A. Denny.

(No. 1254, Op. Book No. 2, p. 565.)

Appeal from Houston County.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 808. *Assignment for benefit of creditors held fraudulent and void, because of a certain reservation contained in it.*An assignment made for the benefit of creditors. *461contained, the following clause in favor of the assignors, viz.: “And we stipulate that we shall be fully released and discharged from liability on account of any of the aforesaid debts as a condition of this assignment; and that any of said creditors who accept said assignment shall thereby release and discharge us from their claims against us.” Held, that this reservation in the deed rendered it fraudulent and void upon its face as to creditors. [Baldwin v. Peet, 22 Tex. 708; R. S. 2465; Burrill on Assignments, §§ 195, 196.] This suit was brought by appellee, trustee in the deed of assignment, against appellant Bayne as sheriff, and Greenleve, Block & Co., plaintiffs in attachment, to recover the value of property conveyed in the deed of assignment, and seized and sold by Bayne as sheriff under a writ of attachment in favor of Greenleve, Block & Co. against the assignor in the deed. Appellants set up in defense that the deed of assignment was fraudulent and void as to the creditors of the assignor. The verdict and judgment of the court below sustained the deed, and appellee recovered judgment against appellants for the value of the property.

March 8, 1882.

Eeversed and remanded.

Note.— There had been a former appeal in this same case. The first appeal was from a judgment of the court below sustaining defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s petition. The appeal was decided bjr the commissioners of appeal, Presiding Judge Walker delivering the opinion, and the judgment of the lower court was reversed and the cause remanded for trial upon its merits, the decision being that the plaintiff’s petition was sufficient. The opinion of the court on the first appeal is not accessible, having boon destroyed in the fire at Galveston, January 18, 1831.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1168-E1169]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   MEMORIAL DAY IS A TIME TO REMEMBER

                                 ______

                           HON. SAM GEJDENSON

                             of connecticut

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, June 7, 1995
  Mr. GEJDENSON. Mr. Speaker, this Memorial Day, as we observe the 50th 
anniversary of the end of World War II, we have an excellent 
opportunity to recognize the contributions of more than 28 million 
living American veterans. Furthermore, it is a good opportunity to 
improve citizen awareness of the sacrifices 
[[Page E1169]] made, and the service given, by our veterans in defense 
of our Constitution and the liberties it guarantees.
  All too often, we take our freedoms for granted. These precious 
freedoms were defended by those who sacrificed their lives in times of 
war. They are preserved by those who exercise their rights in defense 
of peace.
  When I think of what my freedom means to me, I recall the memory of 
when my family came to the United States after surviving the horrors of 
World War II. My parents were not attracted by the flag or the Statue 
of Liberty, for other nations have flags and monuments; it was and is 
the American Constitution, and the freedom which it embodies, which 
sets the United States apart from so many other nations.
  As a Member of Congress, I am pleased to be in a position to honor 
our veterans. The willingly went to war to defend our freedoms and the 
American dream we all strive to achieve. In this time of restricted 
budgets and divisive rhetoric, we must pause to recall the commitment 
given to us by those veterans and we must honor the commitments we have 
made to them.
  Today, there are more living American veterans than at any point in 
history. They are among the reasons that the United States is the 
mightiest, wealthiest, most secure nation on the earth today. They are 
the reason the United States has been, and will continue to be, the 
bastion of support and solace for those in a world still searching for 
freedom and human rights.
  Memorial Day is a time to remember all those men and women who gave 
their lives and livelihoods for their country. Let this 50th 
Anniversary of the end of World War II signal a rededication to our 
commitment to honor the service of our Nation's veterans.

                          ____________________
```
#### I. & G. N. R. R. Co. v. George Leuders.

(No. 2593, R. Book No. 4, p. 313.)

Appeal from Comal County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 314. *Rule of damages and proof with regard to fenced railroad tract; street in incorporated town or city.*The rule of fencing prescribed for railroads by art. 4245, Rev. Stats., does not apply to the streets of an incorporated town or city, because railroad companies have no light to fence, and cannot fence, such streets. Where stock is killed by a passing train at the crossing of the track over a street in an incorporated town or city, it is incumbent on the plaintiff to prove negligence on the part of the company in order to entitle him to recover. It is purely a question of negligence, and to recover the plaintiff must establish it. [Bethje v. H. & T. C. R. R. Co. 26 Tex. 604; I. & G. N. R. R. Co. v. Smith (Ct. App.), *post,*p. 484.]

§ 315. *Liability for stock killed, fence or no fence.*If the stock are killed, or injury inflicted, where the road might, could and should have fenced its track, but failed or neglected to do so, then, indeed, the road would, under the statute [art. 4245], be liable *ipso facto,*whether it is shown or not that the injury was from negligence or ordinary care. The failure to fence *per se*makes the road *134liable where fencing is practicable. Where the road cannot or will not be permitted to fence its track, then its liability depends upon negligence or no negligence.

May 12, 1883.

Reversed and remanded.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Leave Program Updates, Recruiting Bonuses, Airman is NASCAR WinnerPublished April 22, 2022
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Sgt Britt Crolley
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)   --**
                

For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- DAF updates leave program; includes support for fertility treatments, transition assistance programs****- Facing recruiting headwinds, Air Force offers thousands in new enlistment incentives****- Airman wins paint scheme fan vote contest for NASCAR team car**Featured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF 



Military Leave Program 



Skillbridge 



Air Force Recruiting Service 



NASCAR 



Air Force 75th Anniversary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000             APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-31-1999             APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000             JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0                   1,092
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                   3,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  50,254
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                  80,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                  28,703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 189,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                     415
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                     293
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 189,236
<SALES>                                          6,909                  18,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,468                 172,019
<CGS>                                            4,487                  11,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,290                 169,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,704                  13,498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,058                (10,555)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,058                (10,555)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,058                (10,555)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04                   (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04                   (.36)


</TABLE>
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# USSF announces interservice transfer opportunities

              - Published  June 15, 2022
              - Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs

**ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --  **
The **U.S. Space Force** is accepting FY23 Interservice Transfer Program (IST) applications from June 15–30. The IST allows qualified individuals from other uniformed services to apply for transfer to active duty in the Space Force to fill select career fields. In order to be eligible, all applicants must meet the eligibility criteria in **AFMAN 36-2032, *Military Recruiting and Accessions***. The Space Force is accepting applications from active duty officers and enlisted personnel serving in the U.S. Air Force, Army, Navy and Marine Corps. Please note that sister service release is an essential part of the transfer process. All specialty codes can apply; however, the transferee must be able to fill the select specialty codes in the Space Force. See **here** for both enlisted and officer specialty codes. Please follow the **FY23 USSF Interservice Transfer Application Process** instructions to submit your application. 
            - **Attached Reference 1 – USSF Enlisted & Officer Specialty Code Crosswalk**
            - **Attached Reference 2 – Salesforce Website Application Instructions**
            - **Attached Reference 3 – Transferring to the U.S. Space Force FAQs**
            - **Sample Attachment 1 – FY23 IST Transfer Request Letter**
            - **Sample Attachment 2 – FY23 IST CC Endorsement**
            - **Sample Attachment 3 – IST Candidate Data Form**

LRUSAFAFAir Forcespace forceUSSFInterservice Transfer ProgramISTIST applications
News United States Air Force
 Chinese attempts to recruit US, NATO service members as advisors prompts Ramstein conferencePublished Feb. 12, 2024
                        
                        
                        U.S. Air Forces in Europe-Air Forces Africa Public Affairs
                **RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany (AFNS)  --**
                U.S. and NATO officials addressed attempts by the People’s Republic of China to manipulate alliance-trained Airmen during the Securing Our Military Expertise from Adversaries conference at NATO Allied Air Command, **Ramstein Air Base**, Jan. 30-31. 
 
The conference is the first such event to include broad NATO participation aimed at tackling ongoing PRC targeting of U.S. and NATO-trained military personnel for employment to fill gaps in its own air force capabilities. Targeted experience includes that of pilots, maintainers, air operations center personnel, and a variety of other technical experts across multiple occupations that could provide insight into U.S. and NATO tactics, techniques, and procedures. 
 
Among the attendees for this event were military, intelligence, and other key stakeholders from the U.S. – including representation from the U.S. National Security Council – alongside representatives from 22 NATO allies. Topics included discussing best practices to address PRC recruitment efforts and the establishment of shared goals to combat the emerging threat to U.S. and NATO security.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Ramstein AB 



USAFE 



AFAFRICA 



US Air Forces in Europe 



Air Forces Africa 



NATO 



China 



recruiting 



PRC 



security
580 A.2d 734

#### IN THE MATTER OF ALBERT H. BIRCHWALE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 19, 1990.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that ALBERT H. BIRCHWALE of RIDGEFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, be suspended from the practice of law for six months for entering into a business relationship with a client without proper disclosure, in violation of *DR*5-104, for violations of the record-keeping requirements of *DR*9-102(C) and *Rule*1:21-6, and for directing the improper execution of jurat, in violation of *DR*1-102(A)(4) and (6), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review are adopted and ALBERT H. BIRCH-WALE is hereby suspended for a period of six months, effective November 5, 1990, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall be retrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he shall comply with Regulation 23 of the Administrative Guidelines Governing Suspended Attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 7064

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. KAMAL QAZAH, a/k/a Kamal Zaki Qazah , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Big Stone Gap

. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. ( 2:17

- cr - 00014

- JPJ

- 2 )

Submitted : February 21, 2023 Decided: February 24, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Kamal Qazah , Appellant Pro Se. Whitney Demain Pierce , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7064 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Kamal Qazah appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discr etion. United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion and sufficiently explained the reasons for the denial. Accor dingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Qazah , No. 2:17

- cr - 00014

- JPJ

- 2 ( W.D. Va. Aug. 25, 2022 ). We also deny Qazah’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7064 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
583 A.2d 346

#### CARY EDWARDS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DANIEL DALTON.

March 26, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00641-CR

ANTONIO DARNELL JOHNSON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Antonio Darnell Johnson pleaded guilty to burglary of a building, 

and a jury assessed his punishment at two years’ confinement. Johnson’s courtappointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in support 

of that motion. Counsel avers that in her professional opinion, the appeal is 

frivolous. Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. 

California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

why there are no arguable grounds for relief. See 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 

(1967). This court informed Johnson that he may file a pro se brief, but he did 

not do so. The State declined to submit a brief.

Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on 

the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this 

court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. See 

Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 

904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only then may 

we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–

83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with 

counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in 

the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 

S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 

684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to 

withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/s/ Bill Meier

BILL MEIER

JUSTICE

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 30, 2014
News United States Air Force
 Unique C-5 completes major inspectionPublished July 27, 2016
                        
                        By Senior Airman Zachary Cacicia
                        
                        
                        436th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **DOVER AIR FORCE BASE, Del. (AFNS) --**
                Dover Air Force Base is home to a fleet of 18 C-5M Super Galaxy intercontinental-range strategic airlifters, the Air Force’s largest transport aircraft. It’s also home to the service’s only facility capable of conducting major isochronal inspections on them.During the past two months, a C-5M Space Cargo Modified (SCM) Super Galaxy underwent a major ISO inspection inside the 436th Maintenance Squadron’s ISO dock here. This C-5M SCM, originally a C-5A model assigned to Travis AFB, California, was modified into a C-5C model, one of only two such models ever made. It was modified to carry large cargo, such as satellites. The main difference between the C-5C and others is its lack of a troop compartment and it has different aft doors. It also has two places to plug in external power, for both the aircraft and a payload canister.The aircraft arrived May 16 to undergo the inspection. This is just one reoccurring phase of an eight-year maintenance schedule that all C-5s undergo.During an ISO inspection, aircraft maintainers strip down the C-5 looking for any deficiencies, faults, cracks or any other problem in every system of the aircraft. For the Airmen in the ISO dock, this C-5 created a few unique challenges while undergoing maintenance and inspection.“A bridge had to be built to allow access into the hayloft of the aircraft due to the lack of having the normal troop compartment,” said John Greim, a 436th MXS production controller. “ISO personnel brainstormed how to build a bridge and with the use of a B-2 stand prepositioned into the cargo bay we gained access to the hayloft. This had to go through wing safety approval, quality assurance approval, engineering assist and finally maintenance group approval to allow use of the bridge to complete our inspections and repairs.”Coordination with Travis AFB was also required.“The aircraft has different aft doors than any other C-5,” Greim said. “We had to pre-coordinate with Travis to ensure they sent us a qualified maintainer that could operate the aft doors for reconfiguring of the aircraft for our process.”The inspection and maintenance is now complete and this C-5 is ready to return to its home station and continue its mission.maintenance 



C-5 



Dover AFB 



AMC 



Travis AFB 



inspection
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1199 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1199

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2007

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
       To extend the grant program for drug-endangered children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Drug Endangered Children Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. DRUG-ENDANGERED CHILDREN GRANT PROGRAM EXTENDED.

    Section 755(c) of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization 
Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 3797cc-2(c)) is amended by striking ``fiscal 
years 2006 and 2007'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2008 and 2009''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



<PAGE>   2


                        IMC HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1997-1

                              Officer's Certificate
                              ---------------------




In connection with the above-referenced trust and pursuant to Section 8.16 of
the related Pooling and Servicing Agreement ("Agreement"), IMC Mortgage Company
(as "Servicer"), hereby confirms the following:

(i)  a review of the activities of the Servicer during 1997 and of performance
under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement for the calendar year 1997.


                                       IMC Mortgage Company


                                       By:  /s/ Thomas G. Middleton
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Thomas G. Middleton
                                          President & Chief Operating Officer