alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service

          - 50 CFR Part 32

### CFR Correction

In Title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 18 to 199, revised as of October 1, 2009, on page 326, in § 32.35, in the entry for “Marais des Cygnes National Wildlife Refuge” , the heading and introductory text for paragraph A. is reinstated to read as follows: 

§ 32.35

* * * * *

## Marais des Cygnes National Wildlife Refuge

                            A.                             *Migratory Game Bird Hunting.*                             We allow hunting of goose, duck, coot, rail, snipe, woodcock, and mourning dove on designated areas of the refuge in accordance with State regulations subject to the following conditions:                        

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2010-23774 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1180]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      TRIBUTE TO STEPHEN H. WATTERS

                                 ______

                           HON. CHAKA FATTAH

                            of pennsylvania

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, June 7, 1995
  Mr. FATTAH. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise today to pay tribute to 
Mr. Stephen H. Watters, who for 19 years, has been the director of the 
middle school at William Penn Charter.
  Over the past 20 years, he has helped to define and shape one of the 
finest middle school programs in the country. Stephen H. Watters has 
demonstrated his long-term leadership and commitment to the school, the 
development of its curriculum, and to his caring approach to students, 
parents and peers.
  Steve is leaving the Penn Charter family this summer and will assume 
his new responsibilities as head of the Green Vale School, a K-9 school 
in Glen Head, NY.
  Steve's departure will further impact Penn Charter with the departure 
of his wife, Anne Watters, who has served as director of lower school 
admissions as she joins her husband in New York.
  I ask my colleagues to join me in applauding Mr. Watters for a job 
well done.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,079                  13,079
<SECURITIES>                                    36,456                  36,456
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,996                  15,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        778                     778
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,627                  77,627
<PP&E>                                          14,115                  14,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,308                   6,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,705                  86,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,500                  11,500
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            24                      24
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,181                  75,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,705                  86,705
<SALES>                                          8,015                  22,438
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,015                  22,438
<CGS>                                            1,562                   3,893
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,562                   3,893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,518                  33,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,393)                (13,569)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                   (353)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,393)                (13,216)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,393)                (13,216)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.52)                  (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.52)                  (0.56)
        

</TABLE>
#### G., C. & S. F. R’y Co. v. Theodore Ryan.

(No. 3211.)

Appeal from Burleson County.

J. W. Terry and H. I. Phillips, counsel for appellant.

' No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by “

White, P. J.

§ 305. *Carrier of passengers; damages against for carrying beyond station; duty of passenger to notify car- ■ Her of his wish to stop at flag station; case stated.*This was a suit for damages against the railroad for carrying the appellant beyond his station. Appellant bought a ticket for a station called “ Davidson Switch.” It was a flag station, where trains did not stop unless some request was made upon the conductor to do so. Appellant knew that the station was a flag station, and knew the regulations with regard to stoppage of trains for passengers to get off. When the train passed the station, appellant, did not notify the conductor, who had Hot yet taken up his ticket, nor any employee of the company, that he de*530sired to get off, and he was carried two miles beyond the station before he notified any of the employees that Davidson station was the place at which he desired to get off. The conductor then proposed to carry him to Lyons station, four or five miles further, or to put him off there; and he agreed to get off, and walk back to Davidson station. He says in his testimony that he was somewhat bothered when he got off the train, and was somewhat tired when he got back to the switch, but that he was not sick that night nor the next day, and felt no ill effects from walking. He was not frightened nor excited, but just a little bothered. The weather was pleasant, and the road dry and graveled. He got off the train about sundown. We are of opinion that the verdict is contrary to the law and evidence. It was the duty of plaintiff to have notified the officers of the train that he desired to stop at Davidson switch, and thereby prevent being carried beyond the station. This he did not do, and the evidence fails to show the want of due diligence on the part of appellant or its employees.

March 23, 1892.

§ 366. *Verdict Mid excessive.*We are also of opinion that the verdict and judgment are excessive. Fifty dollars for a two-mile walk on a pleasant evening to a stout, healthy, able-bodied young man about eighteen years of age, and who feels no ill effects from said walk, save he i$ a little bothered in his mind, and tired, is, we think} excessive.

Reversed and remanded.
#### G., C. & S. F. R’y *Co. v.*H. F. Summers.

(No. 2579.)

December 14, 1887.

Appeal from Hunt County.

Alexander & Clark, counsel for appellant.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 348. *Damages for destruction of matured but ungathered cotton; evidence held competent to shotv; case stated.*Appellee sued to recover of appellant damages for the destruction of his matured but ungathered cotton crop, and recovered judgment. On the trial appellee, over the objections of appellant, was permitted to prove that the cotton destroyed would have yielded, when gathered, ginned and baled, three average bales of the market value of $40 each, less the expenses of gathering, ginning and baling, which would have amounted to $10 per bale. *Held*that said evidence was competent, as it fixed with reasonable certainty the market value of the cotton destroyed. But if the cotton had not been matured at the time of its destruction,.a conjectural estimate of what it would have yielded would not have been competent evidence to prove its market value at the time it was destroyed. [1 App. C. C. §§ 482, 1139; 2 App. C. C. § 288.]

Affirmed.
#### Ricardo ROCA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D10-2933.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 8, 2011.

*385LaROSE, Judge.

Ricardo Roca appeals the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence. *See*Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a). Mr. Roca was convicted of kidnapping (count 1) and three counts of sexual battery with use of force not likely to cause serious injury with the offense being committed by more than one person during the same criminal episode (counts 6, 7, and 8). *See*§§ 787.01(2), 794.023(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991); § 794.011(5), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1992). The trial court sentenced Mr. Roca as a habitual offender to concurrent life terms on counts 1, 6, and 8 and thirty years’ imprisonment on count 7.

In his rule 3.800(a) motion, Mr. Roca claims that his life sentences on counts 6 and 8 are illegal because they are second-degree felonies for which the maximum penalty as a habitual felony offender is thirty years. The postconviction court summarily denied the motion. It reasoned that counts 6 and 8 were first-degree felonies because Mr. Roca was charged with violating section 794.023, which enhances second-degree sexual batteries to first-degree felonies.

The State properly concedes that the postconviction court erred in reclassifying the second-degree felony sexual battery convictions to first-degree felonies. Section 794.023 is a penalty enhancement statute. *Newman v. State,*738 So.2d 981, 983 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Mr. Roca qualified to be sentenced for these second-degree felonies to a maximum of thirty years as a habitual felony offender. *See*§ 775.084(4)(a)(2), Fla. Stat. (1991).

Perhaps the postconviction court relied upon the 2010 version of section 794.023 which “reclassifies” offenses of sexual battery committed by more than one person. The legislature changed the statute from a penalty enhancement statute to a reclassification statute in 1999. Ch. 99-172, § 2, at 965, Laws of Fla.

However, Mr. Roca must be sentenced under the laws in effect at the time of the offense. *See Vonador v. State,*857 So.2d 323, 324 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (stating that “it is axiomatic that a criminal sentence is governed by the laws in effect at the time of the offense”).

Because the 1991 version of section 794.023 was an enhanced penalty statute, Mr. Roca’s second-degree felony convictions are properly enhanced to first-degree felonies under the habitual felony offender statute, not first-degree felonies reclassified to life felonies.

We reverse the sentences imposed on counts 6 and 8 and remand with instructions to amend the sentencing documents to reflect thirty-year habitual felony offender sentences for those offenses. The judgment should also be amended to reflect that counts 6, 7, and 8 are second-degree felonies. Mr. Roca need not be present for these ministerial acts.

*386Reversed and remanded with instructions.

WHATLEY and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         780,308               2,465,079
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  149,112               1,112,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  18,477
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               619,078                 752,847
<PP&E>                                       4,218,528               4,960,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,011,512               9,854,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,302,787               6,543,924
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       137,837                 137,837
<OTHER-SE>                                   (219,857)               2,321,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,011,512               9,854,726
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               461,753               4,197,836
<CGS>                                           84,920               2,666,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,761,479               8,092,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               156,829                (99,112)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,541,475)             (6,461,246)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)                   (.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)                   (.48)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) FOR COMMERCE NATIONAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARY DATED JUNE 30, 1998 AND DECEMBER 31, 1997
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,648,950
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             7,250,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 15,016,409
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      15,016,409
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        15,016,409
<LOANS>                                    107,364,853
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,130,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             140,349,583
<DEPOSITS>                                 122,764,259
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,172,234
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            626,366
<LONG-TERM>                                  3,634,230
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        74,282
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,078,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             140,349,583
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,647,490
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              477,881
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               206,799
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,332,170
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,199,094
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,356,684
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,975,486
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  124,506
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,864,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                986,110
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     986,110
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   609,356
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0.046
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,447,746
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                86,137
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              3,326,685
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,013,081
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   66,060
<RECOVERIES>                                    58,844
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,130,371
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,130,371
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        732,306
        

</TABLE>
583 A.2d 326

#### THE RAMAPO BANK v. VANGUARD TRAVEL, INC. AND RICHARD E. CLARK.

February 26, 1990.

Petition for certification granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for reconsideration in the light of *Freda v. Commercial Trust Company of New Jersey,*118 *N.J.*36, 570 A.2d 409 (1990).
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H5695-H5696]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                   1020
                                MEDICARE

  (Ms. VELAZQUEZ asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute.)
[[Page H5696]]

  Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Mr. Speaker, I rise to take strong exception to the 
Republicans' proposed massive Medicare cuts.
  These cuts will force senior citizens in my district and around the 
country to pay $3,500 over 7 years. Many seniors will have to make hard 
choices between food on their table or the medical attention that they 
desperately need to survive.
  Slashing Medicare will not only hurt seniors, it will hurt all 
Americans. Medicare cuts will hurt many hospitals that rely heavily 
upon Medicare reimbursement.
  Republicans argue that these cuts are necessary to save the system. 
However, the very same Republican budget that cuts Medicare contains a 
$288 billion tax giveaway for the most affluent Americans.
  Senior citizens have worked hard and contributed all their lives to 
this country. They deserve affordable health care. Let us end these 
shameless cuts and consider real health care reform.

                          ____________________
```
[No. 18362-9-III.

Division Three.

April 18, 2000.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Kathy Kay Balcom, *Respondent,*and Timothy Gene Fritchle, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grant County, No. 92-3-00372-4, Kenneth L. Jorgensen, J., entered March 12, 1999. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, C.J., concurred in by Brown and Kato, JJ. Now published at 101 Wn. App. 56.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
E. Mead, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: July 29, 2003                              /s/ ROBERT E. MEAD
                                                  ---------------------
                                                      Robert E. Mead

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. and will be retained by Silverleaf
Resorts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.