alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jeremiah BUTLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D10-3919.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 29, 2010.

Rehearing Denied March 8, 2011.

*599Jeremiah Butler, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jeremiah Butler, appeals the trial court’s order striking his motion to correct illegal sentence. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800. The basis for the trial court’s order was a previous order entered by that court sanctioning Mr. Butler for his repeated filings of frivolous and abusive pleadings. The sanctions included prohibiting Butler from filing any further *pro se*pleadings and motions in the Fourth Judicial Circuit pertaining to case number 1996-CF-5156, the criminal case resulting in the life sentence Mr. Butler is currently serving.

Noting that this is the twenty-sixth of twenty-seven appellate actions filed by Appellant in this court, twenty-two of them pertaining to case number 96-5156-CFA (4th Cir., Duval County), we issued him an order to show cause why this court should not summarily affirm the order to be reviewed, under Rule 9.315, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure; why Appellant should not be sanctioned pursuant to Rule 9.410, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure for filing a frivolous appeal; and why such sanctions should not include a .direction to the Clerk of this Court to reject any future pleadings, petitions, motions, letters, documents, or other filing submitted to this Court by Appellant relating to his conviction and sentence. Mr. Butler responded with a lengthy document reiterating his challenges to his sentence rather than explaining his numerous filings or pointing out any error in the trial court’s order.

Mr. Butler’s response fails to show cause why the actions described in this court’s order should not take place. Courts’ authority to regulate the proceedings to promote the orderly administration of justice, including the efficient use of the limited judicial resources available to the system and litigants, is firmly established. *State v. Spencer,*751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999); *Robinson v. State,*949 So.2d 1091 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); *Hepburn v. State,*934 So.2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); *Isley v. State,*652 So.2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Considering Appellant’s incessant initiation of proceedings in this court, and finding this appeal frivolous, we find that Appellant has abused the judicial process and hindered the ability of this Court to orderly administer justice to those who have genuine disputes and colorable claims. *See Pettway v. McNeil,*987 So.2d 20 (Fla.2008).

*600Accordingly, the order on appeal is AFFIRMED. In addition, in order to preserve the right of access for all litigants and promote the interests of justice, the Clerk of this Court is hereby instructed to reject any future pleadings, petitions, motions, documents, or other filings submitted by Jeremiah Butler, DC # J02866, that are related to his convictions and sentences in Case No.1996 CF 05156 (4th Cir., Duval), unless signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar.

It is so ordered.

BENTON, C.J., PADOVANO, and CLARK, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, NORMAN E. DRAPEAU, JR., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MRO Software, Inc., a
Massachusetts Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 9, 2005

By: /s/ Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.
---------------------------------
Norman E. Drapeau, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Page 29
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00100-CR

Joshua Richard Crouch

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (1282197D)

May 29, 2014

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to include

the $10,000 fine assessed by the jury and pronounced by the trial court. It is 

ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Sue Walker___________________

 Justice Sue Walker
422 A.2d 1163

#### Commonwealth v. Strothers, Appellant.

Submitted April 12, 1979.

Lester G. Nauhaus, Public Defender, for appellant; Charles W. Johns, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before CERCONE, P. J., and WIEAND and HOFFMAN, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          33,733
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,733
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          321,631
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,872
<OTHER-SE>                                   (317,770)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,733
<SALES>                                         23,086
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,086
<CGS>                                           16,287
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  518,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (459,449)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (459,449)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (459,449)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         163,894
<SECURITIES>                                   176,612
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,915
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,544
<INVENTORY>                                     73,469
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               585,691
<PP&E>                                         143,439
<DEPRECIATION>                                  70,529
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 665,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          124,658
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       636,077
<OTHER-SE>                                    (95,374)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   665,388
<SALES>                                        285,484
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               285,484
<CGS>                                          127,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  127,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               336,424
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (171,309)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,842
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (179,151)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (179,151)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.76)
        

</TABLE>
OBN Holdings



December 18, 2003

Dr. Larry Taylor
4322 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90010

Re:	OBN Holdings Stock Owned by Corine Taylor
        with you as Custodian

Dear Dr. Taylor:

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which
is hereby acknowledged by the parties, on behalf of Corine Taylor, a
minor, you agree to the following:

     1.  All shares of OBN Holdings, Inc. common stock owned by you,
         which totals 5,000, shall have a lock-up period of one (1)
         year from the effective date of the current SB-2 filing, and
         may not be sold prior to that time;

     2.  Should, prior to the aforementioned lock-up period, you elect
         to gift, or otherwise grant any third party shares of stock
         you currently own, any such stock gifted or granted shall have
         the same lock-up provisions as if you continued to own the
         shares; and

     3.  Once the lock-up period has expired, you shall not exceed the
         currently existing SEC 144 Regulations, which includes not
         selling any more than one percent (1%) of the outstanding
         shares within a ninety (90) day period, and filing Forms 3, 4
         or 5 with the SEC.

If you are in agreement with the aforementioned terms and conditions,
please acknowledge by signing below.

Sincerely,

/s/ Donald Wilson
Donald Wilson
Corporate Secretary


Agreed and accepted

/s/ Larry Taylor
_________________________________________
Larry Taylor f/b/o Corine Taylor, a minor

8275 South Eastern Ave., Suite 200 .Las Vegas, NV 89123
          (702) 938-0467 .(702) 990-8681 Fax


<PAGE>
#### Carl Eric OLSEN, Appellant, v. STATE OF IOWA, Appellee.

No. 86-2208.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 31, 1986.

Decided Dec. 10, 1986.

*653Before HEANEY, WOLLMAN and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Carl Eric Olsen appeals from the district court’s1 order of summary dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus relief, 649 F.Supp. 14. We summarily affirm.

Olsen was convicted of unlawful possession of marijuana with intent to deliver, in violation of Iowa Code § 204.401(1). His sole defense was that, as a member and priest of the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church, his possession and use of the marijuana were protected by the first amendment’s free-exercise clause, and by the equal protection clause. The Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church is a religious organization whose members use marijuana for sacramental purposes.

Olsen based his equal protection argument on the legislative exemption granted to members of the Native American Church for the religious use of peyote. The Iowa Supreme Court rejected Olsen’s claims, holding (1) that a compelling state interest in regulating the use of marijuana outweighed his free-exercise rights, and (2) that the exemption for the Native American Church’s ceremonial use of peyote applied only to controlled and isolated circumstances, in contrast to the Coptic Church members’ continuous and public use of marijuana, regardless of age or occupation.

Olsen subsequently filed the present pro se petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, reasserting his free-exercise and equal protection claims. The district court summarily dismissed the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. Thereafter, the district court granted a certificate of probable cause. 649 F.Supp. 14. This appeal followed, in which Olsen again asserts his constitutional claims.

We agree with the district court that Olsen’s claims are without merit. *See, e.g., United States v. Rush,*738 F.2d 497, 511-513 (1st Cir.1984), *cert. denied,*471 U.S. 1120, 105 S.Ct. 2370, 86 L.Ed.2d 269 (1985) (rejecting free-exercise and equal protection claims by members of the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church convicted for possession of marijuana); *United States v. Middleton,*690 F.2d 820, 824-825 (11th Cir.1982) (rejecting similar free-exercise claim); *Randall v. Wyrick,*441 F.Supp. 312, 315-316 (W.D.Mo.1977) (rejecting similar free-exercise claims by members of the Aquarian Brotherhood Church). Accordingly, the district court’s order of summary dismissal is affirmed, pursuant to 8th Cir.R. 12(a).

1

. The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Global Futures Report, SECAF Visits Recruiting HQ, $1M Innovation RodeoPublished April 21, 2023
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Milton Hamilton
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, the Global Futures Report looks at possible scenarios for the year 2040, Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall visits recruiters to emphasize the importance of their mission, and the Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center is looking for good ideas during their Innovation Rodeo. (Hosted by Tech. Sgt.Brittain Crolley)

02:00


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



Global Futures Report 



SecAF 



Frank Kendall 



AFRS 



recruiting 



AFMISC 



Innovation Rodeo Related Links
        Air Force releases Global Futures Report: Joint Functions in 2040
                                April 12, 2023
                                The report incorporates findings using Foresight Methodology to identify key forces and factors that will drive or constrain how the service will fight in 2040.
            
            SecAF updated on recruiting efforts, meets local recruiters
                                April 10, 2023
                                Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall visited Air Force Recruiting Service to discuss the Air Force's ability to attract and recruit Airmen.
            
            Wanted: Ideas for 2023 AFIMSC Innovation Rodeo; $1M up for grabs
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1171]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______

                           HON. TOM A. COBURN

                              of oklahoma

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, June 7, 1995
  Mr. COBURN. Mr. Speaker, I unavoidably missed several votes on 
Tuesday, May 23, due to family reasons--my daughter's high school 
graduation. Had I been present, I would have voted ``aye'' on passage 
of H. Res. 155 (Roll Call Vote 347) and the Brownback Amendment to H.R. 
1561 (Roll Call Vote 348).

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Soil Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Carl
P. Ranno, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Ken Lew,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Carl P. Ranno                                    /s/ Ken Lew
-------------------------------------                ---------------------------
Carl P. Ranno                                        Ken Lew
Chief Executive Officer and President                Chief Financial Officer
September 29, 2003                                   September 29, 2003
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5554]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentlewoman from Ohio [Ms. Kaptur] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Ms. KAPTUR addressed the House. Her remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 Airmen perform first F-35A weapons load verificationPublished Sept. 4, 2013
                        
                        By Lt. j.g. Lisa Lill
                        
                        
                        33rd Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                After months of preparation the weapons troop standardization load crew, or SLC, from the 33rd Maintenance Group performed the first munitions load verification on the F-35A Lightning II here Aug. 27. 
"Over the next couple of days, our 33d Fighter Wing maintenance professionals, alongside representatives from the F-35 Program Office and Air Combat Command, will validate weapons loading procedures. This involves loading and unloading laser-guided and GPS-guided bombs, and air-to-air missiles into the weapons bays of the aircraft and ensuring the instructions we provide our load crews are accurate and effective - one more step towards F-35 initial war fighting capability," explained Lt. Col. Ron Huzzard, the deputy commander of the 33rd MXG.
The SLC has been practicing this load verification using a series of tabletop exercises for several months. This marked the first hands-on load verification for the crew. 
"Watching our weapons troops verify loading procedures was like getting a glimpse into the future. Ultimately, this will be the work that is performed down range when it counts, and we are laying that foundation here at Eglin," said Navy Capt. Lance Massey II, the commander of the 33rd MXG. "The stealth capability on the F-35 is beyond incredible, but the weapons capability rounds out the whole purpose of the joint strike fighter." 
The procedure was overseen by Chief Master Sgt. Christopher Wilbur, the wing weapons manager at the 33rd MXG.
"The Airmen walked through the technical instructions to verify the data is accurate and make adjustments as necessary," Wilbur said about the verification load exercise.
The three-person SLC included Master Sgt. Karen Griffin, Tech. Sgt. Russell Fontaine and Staff Sgt. Steven Dash. Working as a cohesive team, the trio carefully performed several iterations of loading and unloading four different munitions. Once the procedures are verified SLC members will train the weapon troops. 
"Getting this step verified in ALIS (the automated logistics information system) for the F-35A is important, so we can move forward and get our 60-plus maintainers trained and working," Griffin said.Joint Strike Fighter 



maintenance 



weapons loaders 



Eglin Air Force Base 



33rd Maintenance Group 



F-35