alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 First F-35A operational weapons load crew qualifiedPublished Oct. 22, 2014
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Marleah Robertson
                        
                        
                        33rd Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                Three Airmen with the 58th Aircraft Maintenance Unit became the first qualified operational weapons load crew for the F-35A Lightning II during a qualification load here, Oct. 10.
Staff Sgt. Zachary Watts, the 58th AMU crew one load crew chief, leveraged his 10 years of experience loading munitions on F-16 Fighting Falcons to lead his crew through the successful load. Airmen 1st Class Robert Hughes and Reece Zoller, both 58th AMU crew one load crewmembers, joined Watts for the weeklong load drill after completing technical training at the Academic Training Center.
"Before us, there was no weapons capability," Watts said. "We're making it from an airline into the Air Force."
With the first operational weapons load crew qualified, the F-35A is now one step closer to its initial operational capability (IOC).
"We have a total of 10 weapons load crews in the wing," said Senior Master Sgt. Jason Sells, the 33rd Maintenance Group weapons standardization superintendent. "The next step is to bring a new load crew through every month and get them qualified through a weeks' worth of training. Once that happens, each load crew will continually come through every month for proficiency load training."
Sells added that all weapons load crews will be qualified and performing proficiency training within the next six months.
The F-35 training program here currently serves as the primary source of F-35 expertise to new F-35A units across the Air Force. The newly qualified teams will continue to hone their skills and become experts at their jobs so they can go train the weapons load crews at those bases receiving the F-35A.
"We are trying to build the most educated and most proficient F-35A weapons loaders out there," Sells said. "Anything that we can do to help mature the program to get us ready for IOC, that's our big thing. Training is what the 33rd (MXG) is all about - whether it's pilot training or maintenance training, that's what we're doing."Eglin AFB 



AFMC 



ACC 



ammo 



F-35A Lightning II Related Links
        F-35A Lightning II
                                April 11, 2014
                                The F-35A is the U.S. Air Force’s latest fifth-generation fighter. The F-35A will provide next-generation stealth, enhanced situational awareness, and reduced vulnerability for the United States and allied nations.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 5/29/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

ANDREW PEREZ, ) ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. 95-2195 ) (D.C. No. CIV 92-0101 MV/JHG) JOHN THOMAS, Warden, ) (D. N.M.) ) Respondent-Appellee. )

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA, McWILLIAMS, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Andrew Perez appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. In 1989, a jury convicted Petitioner in New Mexico state court of criminal sexual penetration, kidnaping, and bribery or intimidation of a witness. On direct appeal, the New Mexico Court of Appeals affirmed Petitioner’s conviction, and the New Mexico Supreme Court denied Petitioner’s petition for writ of certiorari. Petitioner2

unsuccessfully sought habeas corpus relief in New Mexico state court. The New Mexico Supreme Court declined certiorari review of the dismissal of Petitioner’s state habeas corpus petition on December 16, 1991. On January 29, 1992 Petitioner filed the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the district court. The district court dismissed the petition with prejudice based on a magistrate judge’s recommended disposition. On appeal, Petitioner argues the district court erred in dismissing his § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Specifically, Petitioner asserts: (1) the district court erred in holding he was procedurally barred from claiming that his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses was violated when the trial court excluded evidence of the victim’s prior sexual activity with Petitioner; (2) his trial counsel rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to preserve his Sixth Amendment confrontation claim; (3) this court should excuse his procedural default of his claim regarding his prior sexual relationship with the victim on the basis of cause and prejudice or a fundamental miscarriage of justice; (4) his conviction was obtained in violation of his Sixth Amendment confrontation rights when the trial court refused to allow Petitioner to cross examine the victim about her prior sexual relationship with Petitioner and her prior sexual activity with a third party; and (5) Petitioner’s convictions for kidnaping and criminal sexual penetration constitute double jeopardy in violation of the Fifth Amendment. We have reviewed Petitioner’s brief, the parties’ oral arguments, the magistrate3

judge’s recommended disposition, the district court’s order, and the entire record before us. Based upon our review of the record, we have determined there is no reversible error and AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal of Petitioner’s § 2254 petition.
AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court

Bobby R. Baldock
#### E. M. Tillman et al. v. Kansas City Distilling Co.

(No. 5218.)

April 27, 1887.

Appeal from Dallas County.

Lathrop & Lathrop, counsel for appellant.

H. P. Lawthee 'and Wm. J. Moroney, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 285. *Stoppage in transitu; facts held to show the right of.*Under a contract of sale on a credit of ninety days appellee shipped to Simmons & Co., of Dallas, five barrels of whisky. While the whisky was in the railroad depot at Dallas, it was seized by the sheriff under an attachment in favor of appellants against Simmons & Co. In order to obtain possession of said whisky the sheriff paid the freight charges due thereon. The whisky was held under this attachment for several days, -when it was released therefrom, but another attachment issued in the same way was immediately levied thereon, and the whisky was sold under said second writ, and appellant received the proceeds thereof. While the goods were held under the first attachment appellee gave notice to the officer holding the same, and also to the agent of the railway company, that he claimed said whisky by virtue of his right of stoppage *in transitu.*Simmons'& Co. were proved to be insolvent. Appellee sued appellants for the value of said whisky, and recovered judgment therefor. *Held:*The facts stated show that appellee’s right of stoppage *in transitu*was not lost,- and the judgment is correct. [Stuart & Sutherland v. Mau & Co. 2 W. Con. Rep. p. 688; 2 Benj. on Sales, 1264-9.]

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Sean F. Moran, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sontra Medical Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: February 16, 2005
|                       
|/s/    SEAN F.
MORAN   
|Sean F. Moran          
|Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23779]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, September 21, 2010, at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items To Be Discussed

    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-23779 Filed 9-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1045 

To designate the Federal building located at 210 Walnut Street in Des 

Moines, Iowa, as the ‘‘Neal Smith Federal Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2007 

Mr. BOSWELL (for himself and Mr. REGULA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building located at 210 Walnut 

Street in Des Moines, Iowa, as the ‘‘Neal Smith Federal 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The Federal building located at 210 Walnut Street 

5 in Des Moines, Iowa, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Neal Smith Federal Building’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 1045 IH

1 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be 

2 a reference to the ‘‘Neal Smith Federal Building’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
# Operation Desert Storm changed the Air Force through innovation

          Secretary of the Air Force Command Information / Published January 21, 2016

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- **

PHOTO DETAILS /  DOWNLOAD HI-RES

Lt. Gen. John Raymond, the Air Force deputy chief of staff for operations, addresses attendees during an Air Force Association breakfast at the Key Bridge Marriott in Arlington, Va., Jan. 20, 2016. Raymond was the first guest speaker for the 2016 AFA breakfast series. (U.S. Air Force photo/Staff Sgt. Whitney Stanfield)

PHOTO DETAILS /  DOWNLOAD HI-RES

Lt. Gen. John Raymond, the Air Force deputy chief of staff for operations, addresses attendees during an Air Force Association breakfast at the Key Bridge Marriott in Arlington, Va., Jan. 20, 2016. Raymond highlighted Air Force efforts during Operation Desert Storm. (U.S. Air Force photo/Staff Sgt. Whitney Stanfield)

innovationDesert StormAFAanniversary
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5606]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            LEAVE OF ABSENCE

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted to:
  Mrs. Meyers of Kansas (at the request of Mr. Armey) for May 23, 24, 
and 25, on account of illness.

                          ____________________
```
##### 



Exhibit 8.1


ACTIVE SUBSIDIARIES OF IONA TECHNOLOGIES
PLC

|                                   |  |                         
|---------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Subsidiary                         |  | Country of Incorporation
|                                   |  |                         
|IONA Technologies, Inc.            |  | US                      
|IONA Technologies Pty. Limited     |  | Australia               
|IONA Technologies Finance          |  | Cayman Islands          
|IONA Technologies China Limited    |  | China                   
|IONA Technologies GmbH             |  | Germany                 
|IONA Technologies UK Limited       |  | UK                      
|IONA Technologies Sarl             |  | France                  
|IONA Technologies Singapore        |  | Singapore               
|IONA Technologies Japan            |  | Japan                   
|IONA Technologies Italia Srl       |  | Italy                   
|IONA Technologies (Suisse) SA      |  | Switzerland             
|IONA Technologies (Belgium) SA     |  | Belgium                 
|IONA Technologies Netherlands BV   |  | The Netherlands         
|IONA Technologies Spain, S.L       |  | Spain                   
|IONA Technologies Korea Limited    |  | Korea                   
|IONA Research (Ireland) Limited    |  | Ireland                 
|Genesis Development Corporation    |  | US                      
|Object-Oriented Concepts, Inc.     |  | US                      
|Object-Oriented Concepts, Inc.     |  | Canada                  
|Object-Oriented Concepts Gmbh      |  | Germany                 
|Netfish Technologies, Inc.         |  | US                      
|IONA Government Technologies, Inc. |  | US
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trans Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John G. Corp, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/S/  JOHN G. CORP


John G. Corp


Principal Executive Officer


November 15, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1143 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1143

 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to lease certain lands in 
         Virgin Islands National Park, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2007

 Mrs. Christensen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to lease certain lands in 
         Virgin Islands National Park, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEASE AUTHORIZED.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, after the retained use 
estate at Virgin Islands National Park on the date of the enactment of 
this Act has been terminated and the improvements on such lands have 
been donated to the United States, the Secretary of the Interior may 
enter into a lease with the person holding the retained use estate on 
the date of the enactment of this Act for the use of such lands and 
improvements on terms and conditions determined by the Secretary to be 
reasonable.
                                 <all>
```
News United States Air Force
 Warrior CARE event begins at AndrewsPublished Nov. 17, 2015
                        
                        By Senior Airman Dylan Nuckolls
                        
                        
                        11th Wing Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE ANDREWS, Md. (AFNS) --**
                Opening ceremonies for the Northeast Region Warrior CARE Event took place here Nov. 16.
More than 75 wounded, ill or injured service members from different branches of the military are here to take part in the weeklong event as part of Warrior Care Month.
"Warrior Care Month is an important (Defense Department)-wide effort to increase awareness, programs and resources available to wounded, ill and injured service members, their families and those who support them," said Brig. Gen. Lenny J. Richoux, the Air Force Services director. "This year's theme is 'Show of Strength.'"
The Warrior CARE event offers participants caregiver support and recovering Airman mentorship training and adaptive and rehabilitative sports training. CARE stands for: 
C - Caregiver Support Program 
A - Adaptive and Rehabilitative Sports Program 
R - Recovering Airmen Mentorship Program 
E - Employment and Career Readiness Program  
"At the end of the day, your service still continues, your country still needs you to serve, your family still needs you to serve and this is that opportunity," said Bob Lujano, a Paralympic athlete and guest speaker. "Participating in an adaptive sport gives any person, whatever type of ability, an opportunity to improve his or her life, mindset and body."
The event also provides employment and career readiness guidance along with music and art therapy.
For more information about Warrior CARE, click here.warrior care event 



Joint Base Andrews 



Warrior Care Month
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5485]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The SPEAKER. Will the gentleman from North Carolina [Mr. Jones] come 
forward and lead the House in the Pledge of Allegiance.
  Mr. JONES led the Pledge of Allegiance as follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United 
     States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, 
     one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice 
     for all.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 Alaska air guardsmen rescue snowmachinerPublished March 13, 2015
                        
                        By Sgt. Marisa Lindsay
                        
                        
                        Alaska National Guard Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON, Alaska (AFNS) --**
                Airmen with the Alaska Air National Guard's 210th, 211th and 212th Rescue Squadrons rescued a 65-year-old man who was injured while snowmachining near the Tanana River, approximately 24 miles southwest of Fairbanks, March 8.Alaska State Troopers notified the Alaska Rescue Coordination Center around 10 p.m. Saturday after Troopers relayed a cellphone call from the distressed.According to the RCC, Alaska State Troopers and LifeMed were unable to execute the mission because of the terrain and time restrictions.The rough terrain and remote location of the individual made the situation a good candidate for the Alaska National Guard's unique hoisting and air-refueling capabilities.The Alaska Air National Guard's 176th Wing accepted the mission and launched an HC-130 "King" refueling aircraft from the 211th Rescue Squadron and an HH-60 Pave Hawk helicopter from the 210th Rescue Squadron. Each had on board a team of Guardian Angel rescue personnel from the 212th Rescue Squadron at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson.Because of the poor visibility and the lack of a GPS locating device, the snowmachiners used a fire and flashlight in order to signal the helicopter."The HH-60 helicopter had to try multiple routes to get through the passes due to low ceilings and poor visibility," said Lt. Col. John Morse, the deputy director for the 11th Air Force Rescue Coordination Center, Alaska Air National Guard. "The helicopter had to be refueled by the HC-130 a few times in flight before the team was able to find the survivor, hoist him to safety and get him to a medical facility."The man was stabilized and hoisted onto the helicopter before being transported and arriving at the Fairbanks Memorial Hospital at 8:30 a.m. Sunday."It's important that people realize how important having a personal locator beacon is with the extreme weather and terrain that's experienced in Alaska," Morse said. "Have a trip plan, let someone know where you are going and when you'll be back and be prepared to spend multiple days out in the elements in the event your machine breaks down or you get lost."Alaska 



snow 



ice 



weather 



lifesaving 



emergency response 



pararescue