alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed July 28, 2016

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 16

- 00500

- CV

___________
MYRTIS ALEXANDER , Appellant

V.

COLLONADE SKILLED NU RSING FACILITY , Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 541012102

O R D E R

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter for

County Civil Court at Law No. 2 informed this court that appellant had not made

arrangements for payment for the reporter’s record. On June 30, 2016 , the clerk of

this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that do

not require a reporte r’s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided

this court with proof of payment for the record. See T ex. R. App

. P. 37.3(c).

Appellant filed no reply.Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal by August 29,

2016 . If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court will dismiss the appeal

for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
News United States Air Force
 Forces converge for Emerald Warrior 2016Published May 4, 2016
                        
                        By Capt. Zach Anderson
                        
                        
                        Air Force Special Operations Command Public Affairs
                **HURLBURT FIELD, Fla. (AFNS)  --**
                Several hundred U.S. and partner-nation military members gathered inside King Auditorium here May 2 for a mass in-briefing session that marked the official kick off of Emerald Warrior 2016.Emerald Warrior is an annual Defense Department exercise that focuses on irregular warfare and hones special operations forces air and ground combat skills. The two-week exercise will allow participants to execute advanced tactical scenarios and strengthen joint warfighting relationships for future deployments. The exercise leverages lessons learned from past and current overseas contingency operations to provide trained and ready forces to combatant commanders.Army Gen. Raymond A. Thomas, the U.S. Special Operations Command commander, addressed the crowd at the briefing and declared Emerald Warrior a “pivotally important exercise.”“We have to transform ourselves through these types of exercises to prepare for the future fight that will be out there,” Thomas said.The exercise is hosted by Air Force Special Operations Command, and it allows U.S. special operations forces and partner nation participants to train together to strengthen their relationships and develop interoperability for future deployments. Special operations personnel use the exercise as a way to further develop tactics, techniques and procedures for emerging concepts of special operations forces warfare.“This is about interoperability, joint operations and working with partner nations to get better as a team,” said Air Force Col. Michael Lee, the Air Force Special Operations Warfare Center deputy commander and Emerald Warrior 2016 exercise director.This year’s iteration of Emerald Warrior features more than 1,500 special operations and conventional personnel to include Air Force, Army, Navy and Marine special operations assets and several partner nation allies. The exercise will employ more than 40 aircraft and will take place in locations throughout the southeastern U.S. in Florida, Mississippi, Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama and the Gulf of Mexico.AFSOC 



Emerald Warrior 



Hurlburt Field
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         490,474
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,664,908
<ALLOWANCES>                                   457,605
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,759,810
<PP&E>                                       7,387,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,298,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,661,577
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        76,035
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              135
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,802,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,298,071
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,921,598
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,969,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (408,257)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,094,020)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (458,613)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (635,407)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 14.2



Code of Ethical Conduct for Senior Financial Officers



In my role as the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, or principal accounting officer or controller, or a person
performing similar functions (collectively, Senior Financial Officers) of U.S. Restaurant Properties, Inc. (the Company),



I recognize that I hold an important and elevated role in corporate governance. I am uniquely capable and empowered to ensure that shareholders interests are
appropriately balanced, protected and preserved. Accordingly, this Code provides principles to which Senior Financial Officers are expected to adhere and advocate. This Code embodies rules regarding individual and peer responsibilities, as well as
responsibilities to the Company, the public and shareholders.



I certify that I
adhere to and advocate the following principles and responsibilities governing my professional and ethical conduct:



1. I act honestly and ethically, including ethically handling actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships.



2. I act to ensure full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and
documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by the Company.



3. I comply with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations.



4. I act in good faith, responsibly and with due care and diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing my independent judgment to be subordinated.



5. I do not disclose any confidential information acquired in the course of my
work, except when authorized or when I am legally obligated to disclose such information. I do not use such confidential information for personal advantage.



6. I comply with the Companys Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all employees.



7. I promptly report to the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee any conduct that I believe to be a violation of
law or business ethics or of any provision of this Code or the Companys Code of Conduct and Ethics, including any transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to such a violation.



I understand that violations of this Code of Ethical Conduct for Senior Financial Officers,
including failures to report actual or potential violations by others, will be viewed as a severe disciplinary matter that may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment.



|                        |  |            |  |                            
|----------------------- |  | ---------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: February 24, 2005 |  | Signature: |  | /s/ Stacy M. Riffe         
|                        |  |            |  | Principal Financial Officer
News United States Air Force
 Yesterday’s Air Force: Apollo 15Published July 27, 2016
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Jarid Watson
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- Manned by an all-Air Force crew, the Apollo 15 mission was considered a great success. It was the fourth time man had landed on the moon.
Yesterday's Air Force is a history and heritage featurette series profiling significant people and missions from the Air Force's past.Apollo 15 



YAF 



heritage 



history 



space
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                 ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Trans  Energy,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, William F. Woodburn , Principal  Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to Sec.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/   WILLIAM F. WOODBURN
-------------------------------
William F. Woodburn
Principal Accounting Officer
November 19, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
         other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
         signature that appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of
         this  written  statement  has been  provided to the Company and will be
         retained by the Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing  certifications are
         accompanying  the Company's Form 10-QSB solely  pursuant to section 906
         of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
         1350,  chapter  63 of title 18,  United  States  Code) and is not being
         filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
OFFICE OF THE A’lTORNEY GENERAL OF IMAS: **AUSTlN**

Honorable HomerGarrison, Jr., Director De>artn;e& of Public EiaSety Camp Xabrg Dear Sir:

hed photostatio

uest Sor an rovides for the e by owners oi ttoo marks,and eotor OSthis he County Clerk oa a osrtiiied copy e riled in the county
ment is oonternplating using 033 of ocpffng the original e bottom part OS the original 1 be inasked out, and the rollowing certification will be shown:

1 I hereby oertify that the above Certifioate is a true photost;tio aopy OSthe original certifloate, the above&&orabLe i’%mw’ Corrioon, 3r., Giawtor &%$:,a2

t~ttoc, bxs been issued to this a&icLlnt, clndSilod in the.oSfice OSthe Bureau **of** Idemtifieatioo und Aeoords of thd Terss Ds~artaent of Fublio Safety, suetin, ‘~eras and 18 a pax-t of th8 permanent reoorde or aaid WraPu. 30~~s iiarriron, Jr.,

Dfraator , 

### Department OS2:‘ubm 

### .idtf **3y:**Joe 8. P

ldtaher, Chief 

### Sumallor ldentlrication aQd Eieoords’

“The eignatum or the person oertifyinp; to the oertifiodte will be a photostirtio co;y.

**wii** 

### r45gmruuy **request** phqto5tittiie cogp of a parnon’s tifiarrte is lc&aL, or **must** the by the individual aanua&ly.

“Vie are atCaching hereto OSthe above certifioation aad your opinion If the **oignature** to B **aer** aigacltu.re be ei6m3

. a photoete:ia oopg **fiignfitura. ”** 

*It s:~ll bs the duty of ,tbe Elreotor to forward to the County Clerk oS the **applicant ’** **s reaidenae**  a **oierciffdd** 007~ of said ragietratiozi **to** be iilsd 15 the County Clork’8 ofrios OS osld County in a rsgulur book Sor tazt purgoee, the filing feee to **be** paid by the parson eo registering said tattoo mark and Paid Sillng Pee ofl~ll not rrosad t&a oursOS lWmty-five Centa." You athte that you are **aoutemplutfng** ualng a C;~2otoetstioyroaes4 0s co2ylng the origlaal up~lioation but that tba bottom part will be Assked out. 'L4 ura notEonorabls Homer Garrison Jr., Director Pago 3 i ‘\
rurnished e cogy OSthis a ~lloation, P and are not certain thcrt wa undaratad your propoes , however, w%do not believe that ;;;i;;uld be Justified in i;hotostablng a portion OSauoh tlpplil

‘20 be,lieir t&t the above quoted motion of mmte #ill 62 requires the Sillng with the County Clerlt **of a**  **true 004**  **aorreot** aopy of the whole q?2llaatioo for registration. 30 &r%Surthor of the opinion that such ssotloa requires the certificate **to bear**  **the aigorrturs**  **OS** th9 **yeraon mklng**  **t&s** oertlffootlon **d** that the **jd%otostrrtla** 

### l **tgnatum will**  **bo** ln8uffiolenc for such **pwpoae.**

LA:ncd
News United States Air Force
 C-130 crash victims remembered by colleagues, leadersPublished Oct. 19, 2015
                        
                        By Mark Wyatt
                        
                        
                        66th Air Base Group Public Affairs
                **HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE, Mass. (AFNS) --**
                More than 1,000 people attended a memorial service here Oct. 16 to honor two Hanscom Airmen killed earlier this month when the C-130J Super Hercules aircraft they were on crashed shortly after takeoff from Jalalabad, Afghanistan.Senior Airman Kcey E. Ruiz, 21, of McDonough, Georgia, and Senior Airman Nathan C. Sartain, 29, of Pensacola, Florida, were members of the 66th Security Forces Squadron.During the service, colleagues took time to remember them personally."If you were blessed to be his friend, then you had an incredible person in your life, one who leaves us with a legacy we will never forget," said Staff Sgt. Lee Shortell during his remarks on Sartain.Shortell, who was Sartain's supervisor, added that there were very few people he knew "whose focus on the mission and pride in their work came anywhere close to Sartain's."Staff Sgt. Derek Smiling, who spoke about Ruiz on behalf of Tech. Sgt. Matthew Marquart, said she was an "amazing troop.""Kcey Ruiz, you were not only my troop, my sister-in-arms, but you were my friend and you are my hero," Smiling read. "I can proudly say, ‘Kcey, you changed me.’ She made me a better person, changed the way that I am as an NCO, as a supervisor, and as a human being."Also recalling the two Airmen was the base commander."These two defenders embodied the character, honor, dedication and sacrifice of true heroes," said Col. Michael A. Vogel, installation commander. "I could not be more proud and humbled to stand here today as Nate's and Kcey's base commander."Ruiz and Sartain were deployed with the 455th Air Expeditionary Wing in Afghanistan as Fly Away Security Team members as part of Operation Freedom's Sentinel.At their home station here, both were installation entry controllers and also armorers."On behalf of all the men and women of the 66th Security Forces Squadron, I can tell you how proud we all are of Kcey and Nathan's exemplary service, friendship and defender kinship," said Maj. Joseph Bincarousky, the 66th SFS commander, to the families of the fallen Airmen. "They will always be a part of this family, and your families will always have a place in our hearts."Both Airmen were posthumously awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal by their unit commander.Vogel vowed to continue to honor the Airmen's memory by completing the mission."We will not falter; we will succeed," he said. "And we will always remember our two fallen heroes and those who loved them."C-130J Super Hercules 



C-130 



Afghanistan 



Hanscom AFB
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Robert N. Wildrick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

 

 
| Date: December 8, 2004 |  /s/ Robert N. Wildrick  |   |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                        |  Robert N. Wildrick      |
|                        |  Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
#### Mo. Pac. R’y Co. v. J. W. Creath.

(No. 1829.)

Appeal from Houston County.

Maxcy & Denny, counsel for appellant.

Adams & Miller, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 83. *Pleading; petition in suit against carrier for damage to goods should allege the time when the goods were received by carrier.*Appellee sued appellant for damages to goods, alleging the shipment of the goods from a point in Louisiana to Crockett, Texas, a portion of the route being over appellant’s line of railway, and alleging injury to the goods while in transit. The peti*110tion fails to state the *time*when the goods were received for shipment hy the carrier, and this defect was pointed out by special exception thereto, which exception was overruled. *Held,*error. In personal actions the petition must in general state a *time*when any material or traversable fact happened. . [1 Chitty’s Pl. p. 272.] That the carrier received the goods for transportation was a material and traversable fact, and the time when this occurred should therefore have been alleged. The judgment in favor of appellee, because of this error, must be reversed.

January 30, 1886.

§ 84. *Through bill of lading; each carrier liable.*The goods were shipped upon a through bill of lading, providing for the transportation of said goods over the entire route, said route being over connecting lines of railway, and for which transportation full freight'charges were received at the point of shipment. *Held:*Each of the connecting lines of carriers is responsible for the injury to the goods, without reference to which line the injury occurred on. The provision in the bill of lading, that the carrier in whose custody the goods were when the injury occurred should alone be liable, does not alter the rule above stated. [2 W. Con. Rep. § 430; *ante,*§ 34.]

Reversed and remanded.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Sandra WELCH.

No. 2011-KK-0274.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2011.

PER CURIAM.1

hBased on the totality of the evidence presented at the hearing on the motion to suppress, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress drug paraphernalia seized during a vehicle inventory search made in connection with her arrest. *State v. Burkhalter,*428 So.2d 449, 455 (La.1983) (“In reviewing the trial court’s ruling on defendant’s motion to suppress, this Court looks to the totality of the evidence presented at the motion to suppress hearing and the trial.”); *State v. Montejo,*06-1807, p. 21 (La.5/11/10), 40 So.3d 952, 967 (“The trial court is afforded great discretion in ruling on a motion to suppress, and its ruling will not be disturbed absent an abuse of that discretion.”).

The flight of the defendant’s husband, coupled with his criminal history and prior pseudoephedrine purchases, both of which the police officers were aware, reasonably justified his apprehension and a search of his person, which revealed his possession of methamphetamine. His statements implicating the defendant in criminal activity were freely offered. These statements, combined with the defendant’s flight and her prior pseudoephedrine purchases, provided justification to order the defendant to pull into her driveway for police questioning. Her lack of |2compliance and subsequent flight, during which she engaged in numerous traffic infractions, justified her apprehension and the search of her vehicle.

For these reasons, we find the court of appeal erred in substituting its findings for those of the district court. Accordingly, the court of appeal ruling is reversed, and the district court’s judgment denying the motion to suppress is reinstated. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings in light of this order.

REVERSED; DISTRICT COURT RULING REINSTATED; REMANDED.

1

. Chief Justice Catherine D. Kimball not participating.
583 A.2d 298

#### ROSS GIGLIOTTI v. JOEL MARMAR, M.D.

January 10, 1990.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Michael NICK v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-0158.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re Nick, Michael; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 08-05-0057; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 1712.

Denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10-f-2

         Schedule identifying agreements, entered into between Conexant
        Systems, Inc. (the "Company") and each of the following persons,
        substantially identical to the Employment Agreement constituting
        Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
                for the quarterly period ended December 31, 1998


                                      Name
                               -----------------
                               Lewis C. Brewster
                               Dennis E. O'Reilly
                                  Ashwin Rangan
                               F. Matthew Rhodes
News United States Air Force
 TRICARE pharmacy copays change Feb. 1Published Jan. 5, 2016
                        
                        By TRICARE.mil Staff
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Military pharmacies and TRICARE Pharmacy Home Delivery will remain the lowest cost pharmacy option for TRICARE beneficiaries when some TRICARE pharmacy copays change Feb. 1. Most copays for prescription drugs in the home delivery program and retail network pharmacies will increase slightly. 
The 2016 National Defense Authorization Act requires TRICARE to change its prescription copays. All drugs at military pharmacies and generic drugs through home delivery are still available at no cost to beneficiaries. Copays for brand name drugs through home delivery increase from $16 to $20, for up to a 90-day supply. At retail pharmacies, generic drug copays go from $8 to $10, and brand name drug copays go from $20 to $24, for up to a 30-day supply. Copays for non-formulary drugs and for drugs at non-network pharmacies will also change.
Beneficiaries can save up to $208 in 2016 for each brand name prescription drug they switch from retail pharmacy to home delivery. Home delivery offers safe and convenient delivery of your prescription drugs right to your mailbox. 
To see the new TRICARE pharmacy copays, learn more about the TRICARE pharmacy benefit, or move your prescription to home delivery, click here.copay 



TRICARE 



AF family