alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 35 01

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v. Garl an d Li gh tfo ot ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__
__ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Nor th ern Dis tri ct of I owa - Ced ar Ra pi ds

__
__ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Ju ly 25, 2 01 9 Fi le d: Ju ly 30, 2 01 9 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, GRUEND ER, an d S TRAS, Ci rcu it Ju dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.
Garl an d Lig ht fo ot di rect ly ap pe al s aft er he pl ed gu il ty to a dr ug of fen se an d th e di st ric t co ur t im

po se d a wit hi n- Gui de li ne s s e n t e n c e . His co un se l ha s m ov ed fo r 1
The Hon or ab le Lin da R. Rea de , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e Nor th ern 1 Dis tri ct of I owa .le av e to wit hd r a w , an d ha s fil ed a br ie f un de r And ers v. Cal ifo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8

(1 96 7) , su gg es ti ng th at th e di st ric t co ur t ab us ed it s di sc ret io n in de nyin g a do wnwar d va ria nc e. Lig ht fo ot ha s fil ed a pr o se br ie f, cl ai m in g t h a t he rece iv ed in effe ct iv e as si st an ce o f co un se l.
W e fir st co nc lu de th at th e di st ric t co ur t di d no t ab us e it s di sc ret io n in de nyin g a do wnwar d va ria nc e, as th e co ur t co ns id ered Lig ht fo ot ’s arg um en ts an d reas on ab ly co nc lu de d th at a va ria nc e was no t warran te d. See Uni te d Stat es v. Lewi s, 5 93 F.3d 76 5, 77 2- 73 (8 t h C ir. 20 10 ) (d en ia l of do wnwar d va ria nc e was su bs ta nt iv el y reas o n a b l e whe re di st ric t co ur t co ns id ered de fen da nt ’s arg um en ts an d reas on ab ly ex erci se d it s di sc ret io n)

. Nex t, we de cl in e to ad dr es s Lig ht fo ot ’s pr o se in effe ct iv eas si st an ce cl ai m on di rect ap pe al

. See Uni te d St at es v. Hern an de z, 28 1 F.3 d 74 6, 74 9 (8 th Ci r. 20 02 ) (in effe ct iv e-as si st an ce cl a i m is ge ne ral ly no t co gn iz ab le on di rect ap pe al ; in st ead , s uc h cl ai m is pr op erl y rai se d i n 2 8 U

. S .C. § 22 55 act io n)

. Fi na ll y , we ha ve in de pe nd en tl y rev ie wed th e reco rd pu rs ua nt to Pen so n v. Ohi o, 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , an d ha ve fo un d no no n- fri vo lo us is su es fo r ap pe al

. Acco rd in g l y, w e g ran t co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw, an d we a ffi rm .

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1262 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1262

   To permit the Secretary of Education to continue to waive certain 
   regulatory requirements with respect to the use of aid funds for 
    restarting school operations after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2007

Mr. Melancon (for himself, Mr. Baker, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Boustany, Mr. 
     Alexander, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Schiff, and Mr. Jindal) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To permit the Secretary of Education to continue to waive certain 
   regulatory requirements with respect to the use of aid funds for 
    restarting school operations after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY.

    Section 105(b) of title IV of division B of Public Law 109-148 (119 
Stat. 2797) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: 
``With respect to the program authorized by section 102 of this Act, 
the waiver authority in subsection (a) of this section shall be 
available until the end of fiscal year 2008.''.
                                 <all>
```
580 A.2d 1085

#### IN THE MATTER OF ALBERT M. BUKOSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 23, 1990.

ORDER

ALBERT M. BUKOSKY of Linden, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1965, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ALBERT M. BUKOSKY is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

*400ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1074-E1075]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     TRIBUTE TO DR. ANNA MAE BURDI

                                 ______

                          HON. DAVID E. BONIOR

                              of michigan

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, May 18, 1995
  Mr. BONIOR. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to Dr. Anna Mae 
Burdi, former assistant superintendent for community services in the 
L'Anse Creuse Public School system. Dr. Burdi retired last year and in 
honor of her longtime commitment to the students and the community, the 
L'Anse Creuse Board of Education is naming their newest educational 
facility the Anna Mae Burdi Center for Community Development.
  Dr. Burdi devoted nearly 40 years to public education--the past 14 at 
L'Anse Creuse. She began her career as an elementary school teacher in 
1955. However, for the majority of her career she specialized in giving 
adults a second chance by teaching adult basic education. She also 
taught at Wayne State University in Detroit.
  During her tenure at L'Anse Creuse, Dr. Burdi earned the respect of 
her colleagues and students alike. Her expertise led to many 
invitations to direct education workshops in several States. She was 
also a workshop director for the Michigan Department of Education and 
has done many presentations at [[Page E1075]] National Adult Education 
conferences. Her efforts to improve adult education have undoubtedly 
benefitted students around the country.
  Dr. Burdi was largely responsible for creating a community education 
program that is a model within our State. And, although she is missed 
at L'Anse Creuse, her colleagues and students throughout Michigan 
continue to learn because of her devotion to education. It is truly 
fitting for the board of education to bestow Dr. Burdi the honor of 
naming the new center after her.
  On Sunday, May 21, 1995, when the L'Anse Creuse Public School's 
newest building becomes the Anna Mae Burdi Center for Community 
Development, a permanent legacy of a lifetime commitment to public 
education will be established.
  I have known Dr. Burdi for many years and I know she is grateful for 
the distinction. I ask my colleagues to join me in applauding Dr. Burdi 
and the L'Anse Creuse board for their role in honoring her. Dr. Burdi 
richly deserves the recognition.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5629]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

        A PLEA FOR SUPPORT OF AMER- ICAN OVERSEAS INTERESTS ACT

  (Mr. BALLENGER asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. BALLENGER. Mr. Speaker, H.R. 1561--the American Overseas 
Interests Act--is the first major step toward reshaping and 
reorganizing our foreign policy operations since the cold war.
  It begins by recognizing that--with the end of the long, twilight 
struggle--we no longer need the specialized agencies that were created 
to help in the fight against world communism.
  Nor can we afford them, in a period when we are facing deficits in 
the range of $200 billion a year. H.R. 1561 begins the necessary task 
of reordering, by eliminating the Agency for International Development, 
the U.S. Information Agency, and the Arms Control and Disarmament 
Agency--and transferring their responsibilities to the State 
Department.
  Together with cuts in spending of $3 billion over 2 years--that is 
cuts below current spending--we are on the way toward modernizing and 
streamlining the way we project American power and influence around the 
world. I urge my colleagues to join me in voting ``yes'' on final 
passage of the American Overseas Interests Act.

                          ____________________
```
583 A.2d 325

#### JOSEPH GARAVENTI v. BOARD OF REVIEW.

February 20, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
NO. 07-11-00327-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

AUGUST 31, 2011

IN RE JUSTINO FRUTIS, RELATOR

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. and BOYD, S.J.[footnoteRef:1] [1:  John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.  ] 

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**

Appearing *pro se,* relator Justino Frutis, a prison inmate, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus.  Finding we lack jurisdiction, we will dismiss the petition.  

In his petition, relator asserts the 137th District Court of Lubbock County lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to convict him on April 5, 2011, of aggravated assault-serious bodily injury allegedly occurring on September 7, 1999, because the prosecution was barred by limitations.  In the prayer of his petition, relator asks that we find the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, order his conviction “dismissed,” and notify prison officials so that his time record may be reformed.[footnoteRef:2]  We will dismiss relator’s petition for want of jurisdiction.  [2:  Relator’s petition recites that the sentence he received from his April 2011 conviction runs concurrent with a 25-year sentence on another offense. ] 

Relator has not filed a proper record or appendix with his petition.  In an original mandamus proceeding, the petition must be accompanied by a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to a relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding.  *See* Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1).  The only supporting document relator filed is an unsworn copy of the front page of a judgment.  Additionally, relator’s petition states facts not supported by evidence included in an appendix or record.  A relator’s burden on mandamus includes meeting the requirement that “[e]very statement of fact in the petition [is] supported by citation to competent evidence included in the appendix or record.”  Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(g).  In short, a relator must supply a record sufficient to establish the right to mandamus relief.  *Walker v. Packer,* 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992).  

	While relator’s failure to comply with Appellate Rule 52 would ordinarily require denial of his petition, we must dispose of this proceeding on a different ground.  The substance of the relief relator seeks by mandamus is a request for post-conviction habeas corpus relief.  The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction over a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus challenging a final felony conviction.  Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 § 3 (West Supp. 2010).  We accordingly dismiss relator’s petition for want of jurisdiction. 

Per Curiam

2

2
#### Mo. Pac. R’y Co. v. William Price.

(No. 2444.)

February 15, 1888.

Appeal from Galveston County.

Ballinger, Mott & Ballinger, counsel for appellant.

Wheeler & Rhodes, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 361. *Penalty for refusal to deliver shipper bill of lading; shipper may maintain suit for.*This is an action under article 280 of the Revised Statutes, brought by appellee to recover of appellant $500 penalty for refusing to execute and deliver to him a bill of lading for cotton delivered by him. to appellant’s agent at Highland station, to be carried on appellant’s line of railway to Galveston. He recovered judgment for such penalty and costs. *Held:*Article 280 of the Revised Statutes does not limit the right of recovery in cases arising thereunder to the *owner*of the goods, but gives such right to the *shipper,*whether he be the owner or not. It is unlike article 2Y9 of the Revised.Statutes, which limits the right to recover the penalty therein prescribed to the *owner*of the goods. In this case the action was maintainable by appellee in his right as *shipper*of the cotton; but even if he could not maintain it in such right, the evidence shows that he was also the owner of the cotton.

Affirmed.
#### G., C. & S. F. R’y Co. v. Jacques Tacquard.

(No. 2243.)

Appeal from Galveston County.

Ballinger, Mott & Terry, for appellant.

Wheeler & Rhodes, for appellee.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

*306§ 250. *lieconvention; plea in held good; case staled.*Appellee sued appellant in justice’s court to recover $19.50, the alleged value of a beef steer killed by appellant’s train. Among other defenses, appellant interposed the following, in substance:

“That the animal was killed on a road-crossing on appellant’s premises; ’ that appellant’s road was properly fenced for a number of miles on both sides of said crossing; that the road-crossing was made and the opening of the fence left there for the convenience and benefit of dppellec and at his special instance and request, and that he expressly contracted and agreed with appellant that he would keep his cattle off and keep said crossing clear of his cattle and stock, and that if any of his cattle were killed on said crossing that appellant should not be liable therefor; that appellee, in violation of his said contract and agreement, allowed said animal to stray and get upon said crossing; that the engineer, when he perceived the animal upon the crossing, having previously blown the whistle and caused the bell to be rung for said crossing, applied the air-brakes and caused defendant’s train to slacken its speed, but that before said train could be stopped it came in collision with said animal; that the loss of steam and air and momentum of the train caused appellant damage and loss in the sum of $25, and appellant was further damaged in the loss of time of its employees on said train in the .sum of $10, and that the collision damaged the locomotive in the sum of $25. Appellant asks judgment in reconvention for $60.”

A trial in justice’s court resulted in a judgment for appellee for the amount sued for by him. Appellant appealed to the county court, where, upon exceptions made by appellee to the aforesaid plea, the same ivas. stricken out, and the appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction in said court to hear and determine it. *Held*error. The matter pleaded grew out of the same transaction, and the facts alleged in said plea constitute a valid'cause of action. The exceptions to said plea should have been *307overruled, and as the amount claimed therein conferred appellate jurisdiction upon the county court, the cause should have been tried *de novo*in that court.

March 3, 1887.

Eeversed and remanded.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22-0030 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WELCH, Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until May 9, 2022, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant's opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court April 7 2022

04/07/2022
Case Number: DA 22-0030
#### EDWARD ANDREWS *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 22661)

Schaller, Dranginis and Bishop, Js.

Submitted on briefs June 11

officially released July 8, 2003

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bruce PERRY.

No. 2011-KK-2598.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 1, 2011.

In re Perry, Bruce; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. K, No. 508-707; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1391.

Denied.
News United States Air Force
 Report released for 2015 MQ-1B crashPublished Nov. 4, 2016
                        
                        By Headquarters ACC Public Affairs
                        
                        
                        Headquarters ACC Public Affairs
                **LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE, Va. (AFNS) --**
                An MQ-1B Predator was destroyed in a Oct. 17, 2015, crash after experiencing electronic systems failure and loss of control due to a lightning strike, according to an Air Combat Command Abbreviated Accident Investigation Board report released Nov. 2.
The remotely piloted aircraft was forward deployed from the 432nd Wing out of Creech Air Force Base, Nevada, and operated by a mission control element from the 20th Attack Squadron at Whiteman AFB, Missouri, at the time of the crash. When the crash occurred, the aircraft was participating in a combat support mission in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility.
According to the AAIB report, the effects of lightning induced high voltage throughout the wiring in the RPA’s wings, damaging the left and right wing control modules. With these components inoperative, the RPA was unable to maintain controlled flight and impacted the ground. Additionally, the board president found the pilot’s misidentification of a developing adverse weather system substantially contributed to the mishap.
The aircraft was destroyed on impact, with a loss valued at approximately $5.2 million. There were no injuries or damage to other government or private property.
For more information, contact ACC Public Affairs at (757) 764-5007 or e-mail accpa.operations@ langley.af.mil.news release 



MQ-1B PREDATOR ACCIDENT REPORT 



MQ-1 Predator 



accident 



Air Combat Command 



432 Wing 



Creech AFB
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1123]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      RIVERWOOD INTERNATIONAL'S MACON PAPERMILL AWARDED ISO 9002 
                             CERTIFICATION

                                 ______

                          HON. SAXBY CHAMBLISS

                               of georgia

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, May 24, 1995
  Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. Speaker, Riverwood International Corp. is a global 
paperboard, packaging, and packaging machinery company headquartered in 
Atlanta, GA, with 1994 annual sales of $1.3 billion and 6,200 employees 
worldwide. On May 17, 1995, Riverwood International announced its Macon 
papermill, in Georiga's Eighth Congressional District, was awarded ISO 
9002 certification, reflecting the companies adoption of international 
quality standards for its global packaging customers.
  The first steps in the implementation process for Macon was the 
formation of a Quality Improvement Team. This team became the guide to 
the installation of the ISO standards. The Quality Improvement Team 
consists of department managers, the director of manufacturing, and the 
vice president/resident manager. Department managers were chosen to 
participate on the team because they could provide the implementation 
resources in their respective area. The largest single resource 
recognized was the participation of the operational personnel.
  ISO 9002 certification includes all of the production and 
installation systems of a facility, and covers all areas of the mill 
from the woodyard to warehouse. The mill, which received its 
certification from Lloyd's Register Quality Assurance Ltd., has the 
capacity to produce more than 500,000 tons per year of coated and 
linerboard.
  We should all be proud of the economic leadership provided by 
Riverwood in conjunction with the fine people of Macon, GA. This unique 
focus on team-work and commitment to the community are examples we 
should strive to emulate. Congratulations to all of the folks at 
Riverwood who worked so hard to gain this distinction.

                          ____________________
```
422 A.2d 1166

#### Commonwealth v. Scanga, Appellant.

Argued April 12, 1979.

Timothy R. Bonner, Assistant Public Defender, *for*appellant; David B. Douds, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, for appellee.

Before VAN der VOORT, SPAETH and WATKINS, JJ.

The judgment of sentence of the lower court is hereby affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1236 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1236

To make permanent the authority of the United States Postal Service to 
    issue a special postage stamp to support breast cancer research.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2007

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 
 Committees on Energy and Commerce and Armed Services, for a period to 
      be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make permanent the authority of the United States Postal Service to 
    issue a special postage stamp to support breast cancer research.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.

    Section 414 of title 39, United States Code, is amended by striking 
subsection (h).
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANTTOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

Pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersignedofficers of Force Protection, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”),does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The AmendedAnnual Report for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Form 10-K”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

Date: June 27, 2007 
| /s/ GORDON MCGILTON       |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Gordon McGilton           |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

Date: June 27, 2007 
| /s/ MICHAEL S. DURSKI     |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Michael S. Durski         |
| *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----