alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
19


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002

         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Trans  Energy,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2007,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Lisa A. Corbitt,  Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  Sec. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

/S/  LISA A. CORBITT
---------------------------------
Lisa A. Corbitt
Principal Accounting Officer
May 15, 2007

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.  The foregoing  certifications are accompanying the Company's Form
10-QSB  solely  pursuant  to  section  906 of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code)  and is not  being  filed  as part of the  Form  10-QSB  or as a  separate
disclosure document.
Exhibit 32

                                  Certification
           (Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Robert W. DeCook, certify that:

1. This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Horizon Financial Services
Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Horizon
Financial Services Corporation.

Date: February 09, 2004

                                                         /s/ Robert W. DeCook
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Robert W. DeCook
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

I, Vicki Hladik, certify that:

1. This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Horizon Financial Services
Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Horizon
Financial Services Corporation.

Date: February 09, 2004

                                                         /s/ Vicki Hladik
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Vicki Hladik
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


                                      -22-
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Christopher J. Policinski, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Land O’Lakes, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors:     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: April 15, 2008       By: /s/ Chris Policinski Christopher J. Policinski    President and Chief Executive Officer
#### BRT HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Appellant, v. FIFTH GENERATION SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation qualified to do and doing business in the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D09-3738.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 27, 2011.

Keith T. Grumer and Maidenly Macalu-so of Grumer *&*Macaluso, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

*340Richard F. Hussey of Richard F. Hus-sey, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

BRT Holdings, Inc./plaintiff appeals from a final summary judgment in favor of defendant, Fifth Generation Systems, Inc., involving an asset purchase agreement. It claims that the court erred in interpreting the agreement between the parties as to the liabilities assumed by Fifth Generation. However, we find that the agreement did not provide for the assumption of the liabilities BRT claims were covered. We therefore affirm.

WARNER, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1238 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act with respect to meeting 

the citizenship documentation requirement for children born in the 

United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2007 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act with respect 

to meeting the citizenship documentation requirement for 

children born in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MEETING MEDICAID CITIZENSHIP DOCU4 MENTATION REQUIREMENT FOR CHILDREN 

5 BORN IN THE UNITED STATES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Effective as if included in the en7 actment of section 6036(a)(2) of the Deficit Reduction Act 

8 of 2005 (Public Law 109–171), section 1903(x)(3)(B) of 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1238 IH

1 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(x)(3)(B)), as 

2 inserted by such section 6036(a)(2), is amended— 

3 (1) by redesignating clause (v) as clause (vi); 

4 and 

5 (2) by inserting after clause (iv) the following 

6 new clause: 

7 ‘‘(v) For a child if medical assistance is 

8 available under this title for part or all of the 

9 costs of the child’s birth in the United States, 

10 any claim for payment for such assistance.’’. 

11 (b) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in the Deficit Reduc12 tion Act of 2005, including section 6036 of such Act, shall 

13 be construed as changing the requirement of section 

14 1902(e)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

15 1396a(e)(4)), that provides deemed eligibility during the 

16 first year of life for a child born in the United States to 

17 an alien mother for whom medical assistance for the deliv18 ery of such child is made available as treatment of an 

19 emergency medical condition pursuant to section 1903(v) 

20 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395b(v)). 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 56111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22991]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 11, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. First Financial Bankshares, Inc., Abilene, Texas; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Sam Houston Financial Corp., and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First State Bank, both of 
Huntsville, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 10, 
2010.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-22991 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### NEXEN PETROLEUM U.S.A., INC. v. INTERMOOR, INC.

No. 2010-CC-2760.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 4, 2011.

In re Intermoor Inc.; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 118,344; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 1323.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 85 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5369]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following 
communication from the Speaker:

                                               Washington, DC,

                                                     May 22, 1995.
       I hereby designate the Honorable Jay Kim to act as Speaker 
     pro tempore on this day.
                                                    Newt Gingrich,
     Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>


                                 Exhibit 10(a)
                        Consent of Independent Auditors

<PAGE>

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Auditors"
in the Statement of Additional Information and to the use of our report dated
February 14, 2003, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and
schedules of AUSA Life Insurance Company, Inc., included in Pre-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-110048) and
related Prospectus of Separate Account VA QNY.

                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Des Moines, Iowa
December 29, 2003
#### William Cunningham v. J. B. Ammerman.

(No. 2531.)

Appeal from Eastland County.

R. B. Truly, counsel for appellant.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

Will-son, J.

§ 352. *Forcible entry and detainer, not maintainable, when; case stated.*This is a suit -of forcible entry and detainer brought by appellee against appellant, in which *421the former recovered of the latter possession of the premises, and a judgment for $400 damages for withholding said premises, etc., pending the appeal.

December 7, 1887.

The basis of the suit is a written contract in relation to the premises entered into between appellant and appellee. Our construction of this contract is that it constitutes an executory sale of the premises in controversy by appellee to appellant. It does not create between the parties the relation of landlord and tenant, but the relation of vendor and vendee. Appellant went into possession of and occupied the premises under this contract, and performed some of the conditions of it, and paid appellee $50 of the purchase money. He went into possession of the premises lawfully, and was therefore not guilty of forcible entry. If guilty of anything, it must be of forcible detainer. To constitute forcible detainer the relation of landlord and tenant must exist between the parties, except in cases specially enumerated in the statute, and this case does not come within any of such exceptions. [R. S. arts. 2440, 2441,, 2442; Warren v. Kelly, 17 Tex. 544.] If appellant had failed to perform the conditions of the contract appellee’s remedy was either by a suit to enforce the specific performance of the contract, or by a suit to recover back the premises, and for damages. In such proceedings all the equities between the parties arising under such contract could be inquired into and adjusted. We do not think the summary and limited proceeding under our statute of forcible entry and detainer can be resorted to in such a case as this one. It is simply the case of a vendor of land undertaking to eject his vendee under the provisions of said statute. We are clearly of the opinion that the statute cannot be invoked in such a case.

Reversed and dismissed.
#### The HAVEN CENTER, INC., Appellant, v. Homero MERUELO, Appellee.

No. 3D09-407.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 2, 2009.

*850Kurzban Kurzban Weinger & Tetzeli, and Steven M. Weinger, and Helena M. Tetzeli, Miami, for appellant.

Gonzalo R. Dorta, Miami, for appellee.

Before COPE, LAGOA, and SALTER, JJ.

*On Motion for Reheating or Clarification*

PER CURIAM.

Following the Court’s consideration of the appellee’s motion for rehearing or clarification, the Court denies the motion for rehearing, grants in part the motion for clarification, and issues the opinion which follows in place of the opinion filed October 21, 2009.

The Haven Center, Inc., appeals a final summary judgment disposing of both its counterclaims against Homero Meruelo, the plaintiff below. That judgment did not, however, include an adjudication of Meruelo’s claims against Haven Center for declaratory judgment and specific performance of a real estate contract. Mer-uelo’s claims remain pending, and Haven Center’s counterclaims arose out of the same contract, transactions, and occurrences that were involved in Meruelo’s claims.

The adjudication of compulsory counterclaims such as these is “not appeal-able until a final disposition of the original cause has obtained on the merits.” *Campbell v. Gordon,*674 So.2d 783, 785 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); *Northcutt v. Pathway Financial,*555 So.2d 368 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Meruelo nevertheless encouraged the trial court to add the words of finality, that Haven Center “take nothing on its counterclaim and go hence without day,” over Haven Center’s objection. We reverse the judgment to the extent that it includes the phrase “go hence without day” because it is not, in fact, a final judgment, but we do so (a) without disturbing the trial court’s entry of summary judgment on the counterclaim and (b) without prejudice to the right of the parties to appeal when both the claims and the counterclaims have been fully adjudicated.

Clarification granted; Reversed in part.
#### STATE ex rel. Jerome WEST v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-0184.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re West, Jerome; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. D, No. 261-131; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-1576.

Denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                               BEA SYSTEMS, INC.

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


 Subsidiary Legal Name                          Jurisdiction of Incorporation
 ---------------------                          -----------------------------
 BEA Systems (FSC), Inc.                        Barbados

 BEA International                              Cayman Islands

 BEA Systems, Ltd.                              Canada

 BEA Systems Limitada                           Brazil

 BEASystems SA de CV                            Mexico

 BEA Systems Europe GmbH                        Germany

 BEA Systems Europe Ltd.                        United Kingdom

 BEA Systems Italia S.P.A.                      Italy

 BEA Systems Spain S.A.                         Spain

 BEA Systems Europe N.V.                        Belgium

 BEA Systems Pty Ltd.                           South Africa

 BEA Systems AB                                 Sweden

 BEA Systems, Ltd                               United Kingdom

 BEA Systems OY                                 Finland

 BEA Systems S.A.                               France

 BEA Systems (Switzerland) Ltd.                 Switzerland

 BEA Systems Japan Ltd.                         Japan

 BEA Systems Korea                              Korea

 BEA Systems Pty Ltd.                           Australia

 BEA Systems HK Ltd.                            Hong Kong

 BEA Systems Holland B.V.                       Netherlands

 BEA WebXpress, LLC                             Delaware

 The Theory Center, Inc.                        Delaware

 BEA Systems Holding A, Inc.                    Delaware

 BEA Systems Holding B, Inc.                    Delaware

 BEA Systems Distribution B.V.                  Netherlands

 BEA Systems Netherlands B.V.                   Netherlands

 BEA Cayman Holding I                           Cayman Islands

 BEA Cayman Holding II                          Cayman Islands

 BEA Cayman Holding III                         Cayman Islands

 BEA Systems (Ontario), Inc.                    Canada

 BEA Systems (Nova Scotia) Company              Canada

 The Object People Limited                      United Kingdom

<PAGE>

 The Workflow Automation Company                Canada

 BEA Systems (Ireland) Limited                  Ireland

 BEA Systems New Zealand, Ltd.                  New Zealand

 BEA Systems Israel, Ltd.                       Israel

 Bauhaus Technologies, Inc.                     Illinois

 Softport Systems, Inc.                         New York

 BEA Systems Ireland Holding Limited            Ireland

 BEA CrossGain, Inc.                            Delaware

 BEA CrossGain International                    Cayman Islands

 Westside.com, Inc.                             Delaware

 EntitleNet, Inc.                               Delaware

 Appeal Virtual Machines, AB                    Sweden

 BEA Systems (China) Co., Ltd                   China

 BEA Systems Singapore Pte. Ltd.                Singapore
#### STATE ex rel. Gregory MITCHELL v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-0355.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re Mitchell, Gregory; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. K, No. 09^017; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 10-KA-334.

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 4, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert N. Wildrick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


|September 12, 2007 |  | /s/ ROBERTN. WILDRICK                                   
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | Robert N. Wildrick                                      
|                   |  | Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 780(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: September 19, 2006
    
    /s/ Theodore AbajianTheodore AbajianExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000862

09-DEC-2016

09:35 AM