alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1304 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1304

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
  depreciation classification of motorsports entertainment complexes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2007

 Mr. Thompson of California (for himself, Mr. English of Pennsylvania, 
 Ms. Berkley, Mr. Weller of Illinois, Mr. Meek of Florida, Mr. Cantor, 
 Mr. Lewis of Georgia, and Mr. Herger) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
  depreciation classification of motorsports entertainment complexes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Motorsports Fairness and Permanency 
Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. 7-YEAR CLASS LIFE FOR MOTORSPORTS ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEX 
              FACILITIES MADE PERMANENT.

    Section 168(i)(15) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining 
motorsports entertainment complex) is amended by striking subparagraph 
(D).
                                 <all>
```
#### Merced Lopez *v.*J. M. Rodrigues et al.

(No. 1998.)

Original Application from Webb County.

Dodd & Pierce, counsel for applicant.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 112. *Injunction; jurisdiction of court of appeals to grant writs of etc.; extent of such jurisdiction; case stated.*This is an original application to this court for a writ of injunction to restrain the county judge of Webb county, and the other defendants herein, from further proceedings in a certain suit pending in the county court of said county, until said cause can be legally tried in said court. The facts as alleged in the application are, that on the 2d day of February, 1886, a judgment was rendered against applicant Lopez, in justice’s court, in favor of one Ohara, in an action of forcible detainer. Lopez perfected an appeal from said judgment to the county court then in session. Applicant seeks the writ of injunction to prohibit the hearing and determination of said suit during said present term of the county court, *142because the statute provides that in such case a trial cannot be had unless the transcript and papers had been filed in the county court on or before the first day of the first term of said court after the appeal had been taken. [R. S. art. 2457.] In this case the transcript and papers were filed in the county court *after*the first day of the term, the said term having already commenced before said cause was tried in justice’s court, and the appeal having been perfected after said county court had been in session one day. Whilst the court of appeals is, by the constitution, given appellate jurisdiction in all civil cases, unless otherwise provided by law, of which county courts have original or appellate jurisdiction, and under such regulations as may be prescribed by law, to issue such writs as may be necessary to enforce its own jurisdiction [Const, art. Y, sec. 6; R. S. arts. 1068, 1069], we are not aware of any authority conferred by the constitution or laws which empowers this court to exercise jurisdiction in cases not' appealed to it, or to issue extraordinary writs, save where such writs may be necessary to enforce its own jurisdiction. This application presents no such case. This court has acquired no jurisdiction of the case by appeal or otherwise, and the issuance of the writ would not be to enforce any jurisdiction of this court.

February 17, 1886.

§ 113. *Injunction will not be granted, when.*But if this court had jurisdiction to grant the relief prayed for, it would not grant it, because the petition does not show sufficient ground to authorize the exercise of such power. Such equitable and extraordinary remedies cannot be resorted to, and availed of, when the party seeking them has a full and complete remedy,at law. In this case such legal remedy is afforded the applicant. He may have his action for trespass, damages, waste, rents or mesne profits, and any such action is not barred or affected by the proceedings in the forcible detainer suit. [R. S. art. 2468.]

Application refused.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-25-1998
<CASH>                                            4,894
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    98,838
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                     116,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                226,892
<PP&E>                                          189,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  464,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            99,953
<BONDS>                                           9,567
<COMMON>                                        317,440
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    464,881
<SALES>                                         362,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                362,018
<CGS>                                           229,175
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   317,532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4,208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2,414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  37,864
<INCOME-TAX>                                     13,063
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              24,801
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     24,801
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      1.28
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 82 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 82

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 allowing castration after conviction for the rape of a child under 16 
                             years of age.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2008

 Mr. Broun of Georgia introduced the following joint resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 allowing castration after conviction for the rape of a child under 16 
                             years of age.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Upon conviction for the rape of a child under the age of 16 years 
old, surgical or chemical castration is permitted under this 
Constitution and does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Nova International Films, Inc. (the Company), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 18, 2003                      /s/ Raymond Ying-Wai Kwan
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                 Raymond Ying-Wai Kwan
                                                 Chief Executive Officer



Date: November 18, 2003                      /s/ Yau-Sing Tang
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                 Yau-Sing Tang
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian E. GERDTS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-4020.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 29, 2000.

Decided Jan. 11, 2001.

James R. Fox, Jory & Smith, L.C., El-kins, WV, for appellant. Melvin W. Kahle, Jr., United States Attorney, Sherry L. Muncy, Assistant United States Attorney, Elkins, WV, for appellee.

*190Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Brian E. Gerdts robbed three post offices, two in West Virginia and one in New Jersey. He pled guilty to two counts of using a firearm in a crime of violence, *see*18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c) (West 2000), and to an information charging that he aided and abetted the armed robbery of a United States post office, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2114 (West 2000), and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1994).* Gerdts was sentenced to consecutive terms of five years, twenty years, and 175 months imprisonment, and five years of supervised release. On appeal, he challenges the district court’s finding that he had an aggravated role in the robberies, which resulted in a two-level adjustment under *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 3Bl.l(c) (1998). We affirm.

At his sentencing, Gerdts alleged that he and his girlfriend had worked together as equals to rob the post offices. However, the postal inspector who investigated the robberies testified that, when he interviewed Gerdts just after his arrest, Gerdts told him he was the leader in the offense. He also testified that Gerdts, by himself, robbed a fourth post office at night, without telling his girlfriend, although he was not able to obtain anything of value. Finally, the agent testified that it was Gerdts who chose which post offices would be robbed and that it was Gerdts who carried a gun during the robberies. Gerdts had an extensive criminal record, while his girlfriend had no prior convictions. The district court decided that Gerdts had played the more active role and that, without his criminal experience, the robberies would not have been as successfully planned and executed. On that basis, the court found that the role adjustment was warranted. We review the district court’s determination for clear error. *See United States v. France,*164 F.3d 203, 209 (4th Cir.1998) (providing standard), *cert. denied,*527 U.S. 1010, 119 S.Ct. 2351, 144 L.Ed.2d 247 (1999). We cannot find that the court clearly erred in making the role adjustment.

We therefore affirm the sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

The information charging the armed robbery was transferred from the District of New Jersey. The information charged that Gerdts placed the postal employee's life in jeopardy by the use of a dangerous weapon, namely, a handgun. Gerdts stipulated in his plea agreement that he used a firearm in this robbery.
EXHIBIT 14.3 

 

**Code of Ethical Conduct for Senior Financial Officers**

 

In my role as the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, or principal accounting officer or controller, or a person performing similarfunctions (collectively, “Senior Financial Officers”) of U.S. Restaurant Properties, Inc. (the “Company”), 

 

I recognize that I hold an important and elevated role in corporate governance. I am uniquely capable and empowered to ensure that shareholders’interests are appropriately balanced, protected and preserved. Accordingly, this Code provides principles to which Senior Financial Officers are expected to adhere and advocate. This Code embodies rules regarding individual and peerresponsibilities, as well as responsibilities to the Company, the public and shareholders. 

 

I certify that I adhere to and advocate the following principles and responsibilities governing my professional and ethical conduct: 

 

1. I act honestly and ethically, including ethically handling actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal andprofessional relationships. 

 

2. I act to ensure full, fair,accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by the Company. 

 

3. I comply with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations.

 

4. I act in good faith, responsibly and with due care anddiligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing my independent judgment to be subordinated. 

 

5. I do not disclose any confidential information acquired in the course of my work, except when authorized or when I am legally obligated to disclosesuch information. I do not use such confidential information for personal advantage. 

 

6. I comply with the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all employees. 

 

7. I promptly report to the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee any conduct that I believe to be a violation of law or businessethics or of any provision of this Code or the Company’s Code of Conduct and Ethics, including any transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to such a violation. 

 

I understand that violations of this Code of Ethical Conduct for SeniorFinancial Officers, including failures to report actual or potential violations by others, will be viewed as a severe disciplinary matter that may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment. 

 

Signature: /s/ M. Gail Wells

                    M. Gail Wells

                    Controller 

 

Date: March 15, 2004
583 A.2d 329

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT EDEN.

February 27, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Umang Gupta, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Keynote Systems, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 5, 2005 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented
therein.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: January 30, 2006



|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ UMANG GUPTA                                                                            
|Umang Gupta Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer)



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Keynote Systems, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5694]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      EXPRESSING PRIDE IN CAPTAIN O'GRADY AND HIS MARINE RESCUERS

  (Mr. SKELTON asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. SKELTON. Mr. Speaker, Americans awakened today to good news, the 
rescue of Capt. Scott O'Grady, the F-16 pilot whose plane was shot down 
last week by rebel Serbs over Bosnia. The successful mission was 
performed by the Marine Expeditionary Force, commanded by Col. Marty 
Berndt.
  I share the pride in Captain O'Grady and the rescuing Marines that 
was so eloquently expressed earlier this morning by the President, our 
NATO Commander, Admiral Leighton Smith, and members of Captain 
O'Grady's family.
  I had the pleasure, Mr. Speaker, of congratulating Colonel Berndt by 
telephone just a few moments ago. He was personally along on the rescue 
mission. I have visited our troops participating in Operation Deny 
Flight, which includes an A-10 reserve wing from Whiteman Air Force 
Base in Missouri.
  All Americans should be grateful for the courage and for the 
dedication to this dangerous mission. We must also continue to support 
those who risk their lives every day in training and combat, in peace 
and war. All Americans, Mr. Speaker, are proud of Captain O'Grady, the 
rescuing marines, and all who wear the American uniform.

                          ____________________
```
#### THOMAS D. LEE *v.*AXIOM LABORATORIES, INC., ET AL.

(AC 21622)

Dranginis, Bishop and Hennessy, Js.

Submitted on briefs May 2

officially released May 20, 2003

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
News United States Air Force
 CSAF visits Guam, thanks Airmen who provide Pacific airpowerPublished Jan. 22, 2016
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Benjamin Gonsier
                        
                        
                        36th Wing Public Affairs
                **ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, Guam (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Welsh III and wife, Betty, thanked Airmen and discussed the importance of their mission in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region during a visit here Jan. 21.
At an all call, Welsh spoke about Air Force matters and shared personal stories about himself and his service.
“I’m really proud to be an Airman and am really proud of the Airman I grew up with ... my dad,” Welsh said. “He is just one of many who made the Air Force such a huge success story. It is not because of airplanes or technology, but because of (the Airmen). Every now and then take a step back and pat yourself on the back.”
Welsh also discussed budget changes, future of benefits, readiness, and the modernization of the force.
“I’m not worried about the last 50 years; I’m worried about the next 50 years. Hanging on to things that made us great will not make us great in the future,” Welsh said. “We have got to modernize ... air forces that do not stay in front of technology fail.”
Welsh assured the Airmen in attendance he continuously fights for their best interests. As the budget and benefits are being worked and discussed by Congress, the chief of staff constantly works to defend Airmen and their ability to complete the mission.
“When the nation calls, we send you, and if you are not ready to go, we have an issue,” Welsh said. “We will continue to fund training, education and professional development, so that you are ready, willing and able to do your jobs.”
After the all call, Welsh opened the floor to questions, and spoke about helping Airmen and morale, by doing what he can to alleviate long hours and ensure a healthy work-life balance.
He emphasized how important everyone is to the fight and how it is impossible to fly, fight and win without Airmen.
“Airmen here live in a place that proves geography matters,” Welsh said. “Thank you for the way you represent the Air Force, the way you serve our nation and the way you take care of each other and your families. Never forget how critically important each and every one of you are to the mission.”modernization 



pacific airpower 



Senior Leader Priorities 



Andersen AFB 



Guam 



PACAF 



visit Related Links
        GENERAL MARK A. WELSH III
                                June 18, 2015
                                Gen. Mark A. Welsh III is Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force, Washington, D.C. As Chief, he serves as the senior uniformed Air Force officer responsible for the organization, training and equipping of 660,000 active-duty, Guard, Reserve and civilian forces serving in the United States and