alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

# Time and Date:

12 p.m., Monday, September 20, 2010. 

The business of the Board requires that this meeting be held with less than one week's advance notice to the public, and no earlier announcement of the meeting was practicable.

# Place:

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

# Status:

Closed.

## Matters To Be Considered

1. Implications of Dodd-Frank Reform Act for Board Organization and Staffing.

# For more information please contact:

Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-2955.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at                     *http://www.federalreserve.gov*                     for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.                

Dated: September 17, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-23669 Filed 9-17-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### STATE ex rel. Levell DOUGHTY v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-0696.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2011.

In re Doughty, Leyell; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. C, No. 449-694; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2009-K-1511.

Denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 15, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00447

- CV

Reynaldo GARZA , Individually and d/b/a Crown Duty Free, Gerardo Garza, Crown Duty Free,

LLC and Crown Duty Free, Inc.

, Appellants

v.

VOLTRAN DUTY FREE, LTD.

, Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CVH000767

- D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. Time

is extended to May 1 8 , 2020.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of April, 2020

.

___________________________________ Michael A . Cruz

, Clerk of Court
582 A.2d 808

#### IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT H. CHESTER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

December 7, 1990.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that ROBERT H. CHESTER of NEW YORK, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1960, be reinstated, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the petition for reinstatement is granted; provided, however, that respondent shall be required to practice under the supervision of a proctor appointed by the Office of Attorney Ethics pursuant to Administrative Guideline No. 28 for a period of one year and until further ORDER of the Court, effective immediately.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 13, 2020

NO. 03-20-00348-CV

Robert James Utley Winkelmann, Appellant

v.

Antoinette A. Okere, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on June 4, 2020. Having reviewed 

the record, the Court holds that Robert James Utley Winkelmann has not prosecuted his appeal

and did not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses 

the appeal for want of prosecution. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in 

this Court and in the court below.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1260 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 302
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1260

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 2007

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             August 1, 2007

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 6301 Highway 58 in Harrison, Tennessee, as the ``Claude Ramsey Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLAUDE RAMSEY POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 6301 Highway 58 in Harrison, Tennessee, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Claude Ramsey Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Claude 
Ramsey Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 302

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1260

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 6301 Highway 58 in Harrison, Tennessee, as the ``Claude Ramsey Post 
                               Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 1, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00363

- CR
Jarrett Leon Davenport, Sr. v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 24th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Cause No. 16

- 11

- 29698

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consid ered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. February 14, 2019
422 A.2d 1173

#### Commonwealth v. Viglione, Appellant.

Submitted April 12, 1979.

D. Stephen Ferito, for appellant; Robert L. Eberhardt, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before VAN der VOORT, SPAETH and WATKINS, JJ.

The order of the Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.
579 A.2d 813

#### IN THE MATTER OF JAMES O. DE LANCEY, JR., AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 18, 1990.

DISCIPLINARY ACTION CONSENT ORDER

THIS MATTER, having been presented to the Court by David E. Johnson, Jr., Director, Office of Attorney Ethics, with the consent of the Respondent, James O. De Lancey, Jr., of Bridge-water, and Respondent’s counsel, Gary E. Stevens, Esq., and it appearing that the Office of Attorney Ethics and Respondent having agreed to Respondent being temporarily suspended from the practice of law, together with the additional relief provided in this Order, and good cause appearing:

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. James O. De Lancey, Jr. of Bridgewater, admitted to practice in this State in 1972, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, pending the final resolu*241tion of ethics proceedings against him, and until further Order of this Court.

2. The Office of Attorney Ethics shall take such protective action pursuant to *R.*1:20-11(c), as may be appropriate to gain possession and control of the legal files, records, practice and trust assets of James O. De Lancey, Jr. wherever situate.

3. All funds held by Respondent in any New Jersey financial institution pursuant to *R.*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement and shall be transmitted by the banks which are the present custodians thereof to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of this Court.

4. James O. De Lancey, Jr. is hereby restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension.

5. James O. De Lancey, Jr. is hereby restrained and enjoined from disbursing funds from any of the foregoing bank accounts.

6. James O. De Lancey, Jr. shall comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys.
583 A.2d 332

#### MARIE R. RODIO AND SALVATORE J. RODIO v. ROBERT WILLIAM SMITH AND ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY.

March 7, 1990.

Cross-Petition for certification granted.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force earns spot in Mountain West championship gamePublished Nov. 23, 2015
                        
                        By U.S. Air Force Academy Athletic Communications
                **U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY, Colo. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force Falcons football team has clinched a spot to play for the Mountain West championship against West Division champions San Diego State Dec. 5.
The Falcons (8-3) punched their ticket to the 2015 Sports Authority Mountain West Football Championship when they defeated Boise State 37-30 on Nov. 20 and with Colorado State's 28-21 win over New Mexico on Nov. 21. Air Force closes the regular season at New Mexico on Nov. 28 at 10:15 p.m. EST.
"I'm so proud of our entire football program, from our players, coaches and staff, on this significant accomplishment," said Jim Knowlton, the U.S. Air Force Academy's athletic director. "It doesn't happen without the support of the entire Academy, starting with our superintendent, Lt. Gen. Michelle Johnson.”
The location of the championship will be determined by the rankings after this week's games.
Kickoff against San Diego State in the Dec. 5 championship game is at 7:30 p.m. EST.
Visit goairforcefalcons.com for ticket information.football 



Falcons 



U.S. Air Force Academy
#### Texas & Pacific R’y Co. v. F. W. Saunders.

(No. 3226.)

Appeal from Dallas County.

R. S. Lovett and T. J. Preeman, counsel for appellant.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 304. *Damages to growing crops; one of joint owners cannot recover beyond Ms oivn interest.*This suit was instituted by P. W. Saunders against the railroad company for damages to a crop of corn and cotton, occasioned by two overflows,— one in the year 1888, and the other in the year 1889,- — which overflows were caused by the agents of appellant having carelessly, negligently and unskilfully, in making repairs of their road, obstructed the flow of the water in White Rock creek, diverting the same from its natural course, and causing it from time to time to overflow and submerge his land. Plaintiff prayed for damages in the sum of $995. At the trial the verdict and judgment were in favor of plaintiff for $600.12, besides the costs of suit. It is shown by the evidence that the crops destroyed were crops that were being cultivated and raised by the tenants of appellee, Saunders, and not by Saunders himself; and that Saunders was only to get one-third of the corn and one-fourth of the cotton raised, the balance being the property of the tenants. These facts were testified to by appellee, Saunders, himself, who was a witness in his own behalf. Upon this state of facts, appellant, who was defendant in the court below, asked the court to instruct the jury *529as follows, by his special charge No. 3, to wit: *“*I further charge you that, as the undisputed evidence shows that plaintiff owned at most only one-third interest in the corn and one-fourth interest in the cotton growing on the land at the date of its alleged overflow and damage by -water, the remainder of said crops being owned by tenants, plaintiff is not entitled to recover for any damages to said crops beyond such interest, and is entitled in no event to recover for the interest therein belonging to sa-id tenants.” We are of opinion that the court erred in refusing to give this instruction, and for this error the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

March 19, 1892.

Reversed and remanded.
News United States Air Force
 Minot Airmen eligible for humanitarian awardPublished Aug. 7, 2013
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Joseph Raatz
                        
                        
                        Air Force Global Strike Command Public Affairs
                **BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, La. (AFNS) --**
                Airmen at Minot Air Force Base, N.D. are eligible to receive recognition for their role in the relief and recovery efforts related to the historic flooding that devastated the area two years ago.
On June 3, the Secretary of the Air Force approved the Humanitarian Service Medal for more than 5,600 members of the 5th Bomb Wing and the 91st Missile Wing for humanitarian relief efforts to the civilian community in the wake of the severe flooding in the area of Minot, Burlington and Velva, N.D.
The Souris River broke records in June 2011, cresting at more than 1,560 feet above sea level. This massive surge damaged more than 4,000 homes and displaced approximately 11,000 people including more than 1,100 Airmen and their families.
Airmen at Minot immediately responded to the disaster, building sandbag levees and helping to evacuate those affected. Many personnel quartered on the base opened their homes to Airmen and their families who were displaced by the flooding.
The Humanitarian Service Medal is authorized to U.S. military personnel providing humanitarian and disaster relief assistance during the period of May 10 to Nov. 21, 2011. Personnel must have been assigned to the immediate area of operation, which is determined to be in the areas of Minot, Burlington, and Velva, N.D. To qualify, personnel must have provided at least one day of direct support in the above designated area.
Personnel records will be automatically updated. If any eligible Airmen doesn't see the update in their records, they may take documentation proving their eligibility to their local military personnel flight.
The Humanitarian Service Medal was created by Executive Order 11965, Jan. 19, 1977. It was established to honor personnel of the Armed Forces of the United States who distinguished themselves by meritorious direct participation in a significant military act or operation of a humanitarian nature, or have rendered a service to mankind.Minot 



flood relief 



North Dakota 



Humanitarian Service Medal
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10(b) 


 
 

Consent of Independent Accountants  
  



        We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-          , 811-4092) of our report
dated
March 19, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Protective Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries, which appears in such Registration
Statement. We also consent to the use in this Registration Statement of our report dated July 14, 2003, relating to the financial statements of First Variable Annuity Fund E, which
appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement. 



/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 


PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP

Birmingham, Alabama

January 2, 2004 









QuickLinks


Consent of Independent Accountants
583 A.2d 303

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RUSSELL E. WENZEL.

January 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Byron DAVIS.

No. 2012-KO-0005.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 2012.

In re Davis, Byron; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 475-618; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-KA-0288.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5693]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 PRAYER

  The Chaplain, Rev. James David Ford, D.D., offered the following 
prayer:
  May we remember each morning, O loving God, to be grateful for all 
Your good gifts to us and to all people and remind us during all the 
hours of the day to have hearts of thanksgiving. At our best moments we 
know that the gifts of thanksgiving and gratitude are at the center of 
our humanity and Holy Scripture commends these virtues as marks of a 
healthy life. With all the duties that are before us and with all the 
responsibilities that never quite get done, we pray that we will never 
forget the practice of prayer, praise, and thanksgiving. May we not 
neglect to begin each day and to commence each responsibility with 
grateful hearts and sensitive spirits. In Your name, we pray. Amen.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification

I, Larry K. Hinson, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Rockport Healthcare, Group, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

a.     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b.     Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c.     Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a.     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 16, 2004


/s/ Larry K. Hinson
------------------------
Larry K. Hinson, Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
NUMBER 13-07-00048-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

CARLOS PEDRO ALVAREZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 24th District Court 

of Refugio County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Carlos Pedro Alvarez, attempts to appeal his conviction for money

laundering. The trial court has certified that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant

has NO right of appeal,” and “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
2

On January 21, 2010, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant

has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to

whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the

existence of any amended certification.

On March 29, 2010, counsel filed a brief with this Court regarding appellant’s right

to appeal. On May 11, 2010, the State filed a responsive brief. The Court, having

examined and fully considered appellant’s brief and the State’s brief, concludes that

appellant’s brief does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is

incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. See, e.g., State v. Moore, 240

S.W.3d 248, 253-54 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is

DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

29th day of July, 2010.
583 A.2d 303

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BENJAMIN PULLIN.

January 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.