alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jonathan Morgan, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First Virtual
Communications, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.     The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2003 |  | /s/ Jonathan Morgan                  
|                       |  |                                      
|                       |  | Jonathan Morgan                      
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

31
#### E. Yarbrough v. John Jenkins.

(No. 6202.)

Appeal from Scurry County.

F. Gr. Thurmond, counsel for appellant.

James H. Burts, counsel for a,ppellee.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 464. *Forcible entry and detainer; appeal in action of, not alloioed, unless, etc.; case stated.*Appellant brought an action of forcible entry and detainer against appellee. *564In the justice’s court judgment was rendered for appellant, and appellee appealed to the county court, in which court appellee’s exceptions to the complaint were sustained and the suit was dismissed, and appellant appealed to this court; and appellee moves to dismiss the appeal because no appeal in such a case is allowed by law. *Held:*In an action of forcible entry and detainer, to entitle a party to appeal to this court, two things must concur: 1. The cause must have been tried in the county court on its merits, and a final judgment must have been entered therein upon the law and the facts, or upon the Terdict of a jury, as the case may be. 2. The judgment rendered in the county court must award damages in a sum exceeding $100. If there be no such judgment, as in this case there was not, neither party can appeal to this court. [R. S. arts. 2461, 2462.]

May 15, 1889.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 21



The following corporations are subsidiaries of Hagler Bailly, Inc.:

Name                                               Jurisdiction of Incorporation

Hagler Bailly Services, Inc.                                            Delaware
(a subsidiary of Hagler Bailly, Inc.)

PHB Hagler Bailly, Inc.                                                 Delaware
(a subsidiary of Hagler Bailly, Inc.)

Hagler Bailly Texas, Inc.                                                  Texas
(a subsidiary of Hagler Bailly Consulting, Inc.)

Putnam,  Hayes & Bartlett - Asia Pacific Pty Ltd  Australia (a subsidiary of PHB
Hagler Bailly, Inc.)

Putnam,  Hayes & Bartlett - Asia  Pacific Ltd New Zealand (a  subsidiary  of PHB
Hagler Bailly, Inc.)

PHB Hagler Bailly Ltd.                                            United Kingdom

CORE  Management  Systems  Ltd New  Zealand (a  subsidiary  of  Putnam,  Hayes &
Bartlett - Asia Pacific Ltd.)

Apogee Research, Inc.                                                   Maryland
(a subsidiary of Hagler Bailly, Inc.)

Apogee Capital LLC                                                      Maryland
(a subsidiary of Apogee Research, Inc.)

Hagler Bailly Canada Ltd                                                  Canada
(a subsidiary of Apogee Research, Inc.)

Hagler Bailly S.A.                                                     Argentina
(a subsidiary of Hagler Bailly Services, Inc.)

Hagler Bailly Indonesia, Inc.                                           Delaware
(a subsidiary of Hagler Bailly Services, Inc.)

PT Hagler Bailly Indonesia                                             Indonesia
(a subsidiary of Hagler Bailly Indonesia, Inc.)

Hagler Bailly Armenia                                                    Armenia
(a subsidiary of Hagler Bailly Services, Inc.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hagler Bailly Services (India) Private Ltd.                                India
(a subsidiary of Hagler Bailly Services, Inc.)
                                      India
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hagler Bailly Consulting, S.A.                                           France
(a subsidiary of Hagler Bailly Consulting, Inc.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hagler Bailly Consulting Ltd.                                           Ireland
(a subsidiary of Hagler Bailly Services, Inc.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hagler Bailly Pakistan (Private) Ltd.                                   Pakistan
(Hagler Bailly Services, Inc. has a minority interest)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hagler Bailly International S.A.                                        Belgium
(a subsidiary of Hagler Bailly Services, Inc.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Private Label Utility Services, Inc.                                  Delaware
(a subsidiary of HB Capital, Inc.)
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**449 CA 15-00174**  PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF DAWUD RAHMAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

ANTHONY ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (LAURA ETLINGER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Michael M. Mohun, A.J.), entered December 1, 2014 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Matter of Sanchez v Evans , 111 AD3d 1315).

Entered: June 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit
      21.1**





**SUBSIDIARIES
      OF SILVERLEAF RESORTS, INC.**





Due
      to
      the provisions of Item 601(b)(21)(ii) of Regulation S-K, the Registrant has
      no
      subsidiaries that must be specifically described under Item 601(b)(21)(i),
      except for Silverleaf Finance II, Inc., Silverleaf Finance III, LLC, Silverleaf
      Finance IV, LLC, and Silverleaf Finance V, L.P., all Delaware entities, which
      are deemed “significant subsidiaries” pursuant to Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation
      S-X.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Trans Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John G. Corp, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/ John G. Corp       
|John G. Corp           
|Chief Executive Officer
|October 25, 2011       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Third Addendum to the Joint Marketing and Sales Representative Agreement



 *** Note: Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to certain information contained in this document.
Confidential portions have been omitted from the public filing and have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 
  
 EXHIBIT 10.16 
  
 THIRD ADDENDUM TO THE JOINT MARKETING AND 
 SALES AGREEMENT 
 Between 
 ADP, INC. AND CONCUR
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 
  
 This Third Addendum is made as of May 31, 2003, between
Concur Technologies, Inc. (“Concur”) with its main office at 6222 185th Avenue Northeast, Redmond,
Washington 98052 and ADP, Inc. (“ADP”), by and through its Major Accounts Division (“ADPMA”) of its Employer Services Group with its principal office at One ADP Boulevard, Roseland, New Jersey 07068, and contains changes,
modifications, revisions and additions to the Joint Marketing and Sales Agreement dated as of May 17, 2000 (as amended by this Third Addendum, the Second Addendum dated May 28, 2002 and the Addendum dated November 29, 2001, the
“Agreement”). Terms used in this Third Addendum but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in the Agreement. 
  

Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in the Agreement and in this Third Addendum, and for other good and valuable consideration receipt
of which is hereby acknowledged, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Agreement, ADP and Concur agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 	Section 12.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended by (a) deleting the date “[ * * * ]” contained therein and replace such date with “[ * * * ]” and (b) deleting
the phrase “At the end of the Renewal Term,” contained therein and replace such phrase with “During the last [ * * * ] of the Renewal Term,”. 

  
 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of any conflict between the terms and
conditions of this Addendum and the terms and conditions of the Agreement, this Third Addendum shall prevail. The terms defined in the Agreement and used in this Third Addendum shall have the same respective meanings as set forth in the Agreement,
unless clearly otherwise defined in this Third Addendum. 
  
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, this Third Addendum to the Agreement is hereby executed by an authorized representative of each Party hereto as of the date first above written. 
  

	ADP, INC.	  	CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
				
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Stuart
Salkman                                
	  	 By:
	 	 /s/ Frederick L.
Ingham                                

	 Name:
	 	 Stuart
Salkman                                     
	  	 Name:
	 	 Frederick L.
Ingham                                    
 

	 Title:
	 	 DVP/GM
E-Business                           
	  	 Title:
	 	 VP of Business
Development
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED INCOME
STATEMENT FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           7,755
<SECURITIES>                                       597
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,364
<INVENTORY>                                     14,754
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,055
<PP&E>                                         225,857
<DEPRECIATION>                                  74,683
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,149
<BONDS>                                         94,456
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,317
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,538
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   236,349
<SALES>                                        103,294
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,394
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,996
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,566
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,057
<INCOME-TAX>                                       709
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,348
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,348
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10(b)  


        Consent of Independent Accountants  


        We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-          and 811-01680) of our report dated
March 19, 2003,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Protective Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent
to the use in this Registration Statement of our report dated June 13, 2003, relating to the financial statements of First Variable Annuity Fund A, which appears in such Registration Statement.
We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement. 


/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Birmingham, Alabama

January 2, 2004
[EUROTECH LTD. LOGO HERE]


                                                         February 25, 2000

        Mr. Neil T. Chau, Managing Member
        Encore Capital Management L.L.C.
        12007 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 460
        Reston, Virginia 20191

        Dear Mr. Chau:

        Thank you for your willingness to reconsider new terms for surviving
        agreements between Encore and Eurotech. Following are terms agreeable to
        EUROTECH, Ltd. that have been verbally concurred with by Encore, and
        formally proposed as amendments to existing Agreements:

                     That Encore may convert the Convertible Debentures of
                          Agreement of July 1998 with an existing ceiling of
                          $1,06. As of March 1, 2000 /S/

                     That Encore will institute a floor price of $2.00 on all
                          other remaining Convertible Debentures.

                     That other terms and conditions of convertible debentures
                          and warrants remain as agreed in previous
                          agreements.

                     That Encore accept from Eurotech 300,000 shares of common
                          stock as payment for all outstanding penalties with
                          interest. To be issued as of March 1, 2000 /S/

                     That Eurotech has paid the $400,000 loan and interest.

                     That Eurotech brought interest payments on remaining
                          agreements current as of December 31, 1999.

                     That Eurotech will issue 250,000 three-year warrants to
                          Encore with strike price of $3.00. To be issued as
                          of March 1, 2000 /S/

        Your cooperation through this period of financial restructuring is
        greatly appreciated as it continues to be vital to EUROTECH, Ltd.
        success in delivering EKOR and other very promising technologies.

        Sincerely,

        /s/ Don V. Hahnfeldt
        --------------------
        Don V. Hahnfeldt
        President, EUROTECH, Ltd.

        Agreed and accepted by:

        /S/ Neil T. Chau
        Neil T. Chau, Encore Capital Management, L.L.C./ date


                                        1216 16th St. N.W., Washington, DC 20036
                                        Phone (202) 466-5448 Fax: (202) 466-5591
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of U.S. Microbics, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Conrad Nagel, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, In all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by U.S. Microbics, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





August
      20, 2007








/S/
      Conrad
      Nagel


Conrad
      Nagel


Chief
      Financial
      Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1104

RONNIE A. BELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JUDGE W. EARL BRITT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:15-cv-00629-BO)

Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: May 31, 2016

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit 

Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie A. Bell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie A. Bell appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his civil complaint after a review pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and 

find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Bell v. 

Britt, No. 5:15-cv-00629-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 22, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1187-E1188]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

         COMMEMORATION OF THE RETIREMENT OF ALBERT M. DREYFUSS

                                 ______

                         HON. ROBERT T. MATSUI

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, June 7, 1995
  Mr. MATSUI. Mr. Speaker, I am proud to take this opportunity to call 
to the attention of the House of Representatives the retirement of one 
of the most distinguished business and civic leaders in my home town of 
Sacramento, Mr. Albert M. Dreyfuss.
  For nearly 50 years, Al has made Sacramento a better place to live, 
both through his landmark building designs and through his service to 
the community.
  As an architect, I can think of no one who has made a greater impact 
on the Sacramento area than Al. From our airport, to our leading 
hotels, to some of the finest, most modern office buildings that grace 
our skyline, Al has been a true innovator in creating facilities that 
have made our city more attractive, and our businesses more efficient.
  As a community leader, Al has taken his abilities as an architect and 
literally donated them to our community's governments and civic 
organizations. He was a founding member of the Capitol Area Plan 
Committee in 1959, and served as its chairman from 1959 to 1967. Under 
Al's leadership, CAP led our region through some important transitions 
as Sacramento grew into a major metropolitan area. But he also made 
sure that, as Sacramento developed, it did so responsibly while 
preserving its rich historical heritage.
  Mr. Speaker, as Al undoubtedly is aware, I, at one time, aspired to 
be an architect. When I look at all Al has accomplished in his career, 
I cannot help but wonder what would be left for me to achieve as an 
aspiring architect, had I followed that path. As he leaves the firm he 
[[Page E1188]] established in 1950, Al leaves behind a lifetime legacy 
that will never be forgotten.

                          ____________________
```