alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00363-CR

Jarrett Leon Davenport, Sr.

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 16-11-29698-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 14, 2019
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1256 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to increase the level of Government 

contributions under the Federal employees health benefits program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2007 

Mr. HOYER (for himself and Mr. WOLF) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to increase the level 

of Government contributions under the Federal employees health benefits program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT CON4 TRIBUTIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8906(b) of title 5, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘72’’ and in8 serting ‘‘80’’; and 

9 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘75’’ and in10 serting ‘‘83’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1256 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply with respect to each contract year 

3 beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
583 A.2d 324

#### STEPHANIE JONAS v. PRUTAUB JOINT VENTURE, ETC.

February 20, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 237 *N.J.Super.*137, 567 A.2d 230)
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ROBERT SCHULLER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1653 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed October 26, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Ronald N. Ficarrotta, Judge. Robert Schuller, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
News United States Air Force
 New commander takes reins of 12th AF, AFSOUTHPublished Oct. 4, 2016
                        
                        
                        12th Air Force (Air Forces Southern) Public Affairs
                **DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. (AFNS) --**
                The president of the United States nominated Maj. Gen. Mark D. Kelly for promotion to lieutenant general, and command of 12th Air Force and Air Forces Southern.

During a change of command ceremony here Oct. 3, Kelly replaced Lt. Gen. Chris Nowland who was selected to become the next Air Force deputy chief of staff for operations at the Pentagon.

Kelly most recently served as the 9th Air Force commander at Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina. He was also the commander of the 455th Air Expeditionary Wing at Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan, and has commanded two other wings, the 354th Fighter Wing at Eielson AFB, Alaska, as well as the 4th FW at Seymour Johnson AFB, North Carolina. He is a command pilot with more than 5,500 flying hours, primarily in the F-15E Strike Eagle, F-16 Fighting Falcon and F/A-18 Hornet.

As the commander of 12th AF (AFSOUTH), Kelly is responsible for seven active-duty wings, one direct reporting unit for contingency operations, and oversees 15 gained Air Reserve Component units totaling more than 360 aircraft and 20,300 Airmen. As the air and space component to U.S. Southern Command, he also leads AFSOUTH, which conducts security cooperation and provides air, space and cyberspace capabilities throughout the 31 nations of Latin America and the Caribbean.change of command 



AFSOUTH 



12th AF
#### Ebenezer J. Wright et al. v. William H. Simpson, Circuit Judge of Iosco County.

*Log-lien suit.*

This case is ruled by that of *Pack, Woods & Co. v. Iosco Circuit Judge, ante,*185.

*Mandamus.*

Submitted April 24, 1888.

Denied May *3,*1888.

Relators applied for *mandamus*to compel respondent to quash a writ of attachment in a log-lien suit. The facts are *147•substantially stated in the opinion in *Paclc, Woods & Co. v. Iosco Circuit Judge, ante,*135.

*Shepard é Lyon,*for relators.-

*Traslc & Smith,*for respondent.

Long, J.

Petition for *mandamus.*

The facts in this case are substantially the same as in *Pach, Woods <& Co. v. Circuit Judge, ante,*135, and this case must be ruled by that.

The writ must be denied.

Sherwood, O. J., Chahplin and Morse, JJ., concurred. Campbell, J,, did not sit.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 58421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24012]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1930-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]


Iowa; Amendment No. 8 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Iowa (FEMA-1930-DR), dated July 29, 2010, and related 
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 17, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Iowa is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
July 29, 2010.

    Appanoose and Wapello Counties for Individual Assistance 
(already designated for Public Assistance).
    Pocahontas County for Public Assistance.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-24012 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
**Exhibit 31.2****Rule 13a-14 Certification**I, Frank P. Vaughan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Cronos Group (the “Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the AuditCommittee of Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report information; and(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:August 10, 2006/s/ FRANK P. VAUGHAN
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7575

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

AUDLEY CASANOVA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Frank W. Bullock,

Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-108, CA-01-1059-1)

Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: January 9, 2003

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Audley Casanova, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Audley Casanova was convicted by a jury of possession with

intent to distribute crack cocaine and received a 210-month

sentence. Casanova seeks to appeal the criminal judgment entered

against him on January 9, 1996. We dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

In criminal cases, the defendant must file his notice of

appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P.

4(b)(1)(A). The criminal judgment in this case was entered on

January 9, 1996. The earliest Casanova’s notice of appeal could be

deemed filed is October 2, 2002, the date written on his notice of

appeal. Clearly, the notice of appeal was filed well beyond the

ten-day appeal period. We therefore dismiss this appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. We further note that this is Casanova’s second appeal

of the same judgment. This Court previously affirmed the judgment

on the merits. See United States v. Casanova, No. 96-4051, 1999 WL

2522 (4th Cir. Jan. 5, 1999) (unpublished). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Alton DENSON.

No. 2010-KK-2712.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 4, 2011.

In re Denson, Alton; —Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. J, No. 494-266; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-1105.

Denied.
#### In Matter of Estate of Raymond : Schantz, Exrx., Appellant, *v.*Exline, Appellee.

(Decided October 7, 1940.)

*Mr. Wm. E. Williams,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Krueger, Bosino, Moyer & Moore,*for appellee.

Carpenter, J.

This was a special proceeding under Section 10506-67 *et seq.,*G-eneral Code, by an executrix to recover possession of a cluster diamond ring and some antique dishes. The defendant claimed that they were given to her by decedent. The trial court sustained her claim, and this court cannot say that judgment was manifestly against the weight of the evidence.

The executrix claimed decedent was insolvent when the gift was made, and she offered evidence on that issue which the trial court excluded. There having been a gift of these articles, there was no concealment of them nor were they conveyed away as charged in the complaint. The issue of insolvency of decedent was not before the court any more than was mental incapacity in *Goodrich, Admr.,*v. *Anderson,*136 Ohio St., 509, 26 N. E. (2d), 1016.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Overmyer and Lloyd, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned officers, Wayne M. Fortun, Chief Executive Officer of Hutchinson Technology
Incorporated, a Minnesota corporation (the Company), and John A. Ingleman, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended December 26, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: February 3, 2005

/s/ Wayne M. FortunWayne M. FortunChief Executive Officer
 Date:  February 3, 2005

/s/ John A. InglemanJohn A. InglemanChief Financial Officer
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 No. 333-91680 and Form S-3 No. 333-134405) of Franklin Street Properties
Corp. of our reports dated February 20, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedules of Franklin Street Properties Corp. and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Franklin Street
Properties Corp., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2008.







/s/
ERNST & YOUNG LLP





Boston,
Massachusetts


February
20, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10QSB
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                         912,301
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  543,287
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     36,085
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,717,328
<PP&E>                                       6,544,865
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,450,071
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,837,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,212,103
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,380,357
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,025,072)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,837,955
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,942,742
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,493,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               348,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 97,726
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             97,726
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              3,047,005
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,144,731
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Former Marine serves as Air Force contract administratorPublished Dec. 17, 2015
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class James Miller
                        
                        
                        28th Bomb Wing
                **ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE, S.D. (AFNS) --**
                *(This feature is part of the "Through Airmen's Eyes" series. These stories focus on individual Airmen, highlighting their Air Force story.)*
From base landscaping to office computers, nearly everything found at Ellsworth Air Force Base flows through the 28th Contracting Squadron.
Among the Airmen leading the charge is Staff Sgt. Chris Meyer, a contract administrator with the squadron. Meyer provides contracting support and business advice to Ellsworth AFB and combatant commanders, as he deals with base contracts daily.
As a contract administrator, Meyer handles many facets of the contracting process, from the preliminary overview to closing them out once completed.
“We do most of the legwork, which can be a lot,” he said. “However, we are proprietors of the taxpayers’ dollars, so we try to get the best deals in the most expedient manner.”
However, Meyer is not always in the office at his computer. He also participates in contractor evaluations to ensure they are getting the job done correctly and on time.
“We may mostly be seen behind our desks, but the evaluations are important to make sure the job is getting done on pace, so we aren’t wasting taxpayer money,” he said.**Former infantryman**
Although Meyer may spend a lot of time behind the desk now, that wasn’t always the case -- he served five years in the Marines before switching to the Air Force.
“I enlisted for four years as an anti-tank assault team infantryman and took an extra year for a special duty with an antiterrorism security team,” he said. “It was a lot different than my current contracting job ... (but) while some people may think it is boring; it is exactly what I wanted.”
When Meyer visited the Air Force recruiter, he signed up for a job in the contracting career field, which would allow him to face new challenges. 
“I am still helping people and making sure the military’s needs are met,” he explained. “Now my job is a lot less life-threatening, and I can spend more time with my family. That was the biggest reason for the switch. I didn’t want my kids to not know who I was, or worst-case scenario, not know me at all if I didn’t make it back.”
Whether he is at the office supporting the mission, or at home supporting his family, Meyer said, he could not be happier with how he is serving.contracts 



administrator 



Ellsworth AFB 



support 



TAE
#### Jaime FONTALVO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D09-1228.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 25, 2009.

Nicolas A. Olano, Miami, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Heidi Milan Caballero, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*830Before SHEPHERD and SUAREZ, JJ„ and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

The defendant’s Rule 3.850 motion to withdraw his plea on the ground that its deportation consequences had not been adequately explained was denied after an evidentiary hearing, on the ground, citing *Kindelan v. State,*826 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), that as a legal permanent resident he was not subject to deportation and thus was unqualified for relief under *State v. Green,*944 So.2d 208 (Fla.2006). While understandable in view of the confusing statement in *Kindelan,*826 So.2d at 1005, n. 1, that “[i]t is undisputed that a resident alien who is not given permanent resident status is ‘excludable’ from this country by the INS,” this conclusion is incorrect. See *United States v. Bugarin,*312 Fed.Appx. 147, 149 (10th Cir.2009) (“Because Bugarin is a permanent resident alien, he will be subject to deportation upon his release from prison and may be ineligible for benefits such as early release, certain prison programs, or assignment to a minimum-security prison during his incarceration.”); see also *Immigration & Naturalization Serv. v. St. Cyr,*533 U.S. 289, 293, 121 S.Ct. 2271, 150 L.Ed.2d 347 (2001) (St. Cyr, a lawful permanent resident (LPR) pled guilty to an aggravated felony, thus making him subject to deportation.); *Discipio v. Ashcroft,*417 F.3d 448, 449 (5th Cir.2005) (“Petitioner Ferdinando Discipio, a permanent resident of the United States, became subject to deportation under the Immigration and Nationality Act after a Massachusetts court convicted him of possession with intent to distribute Perco-cet.”).

Because the court therefore erroneously did not reach the merits of the defendant’s showing under *Green,*we reverse the order below for such a determination.1

Reversed and remanded.

1

. The lower court may, in its discretion, receive further testimony on the issue.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18            U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS            ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trans Energy, Inc. (the            “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with            the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),            I, James K. Abcouwer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18            U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,            that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of                            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                            and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,                            in all material respects, the financial condition and result of                            operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

/S/ JAMES K. ABCOUWER

James K. Abcouwer

Chief Executive Officer

May            15,2008

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or            other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that            appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been            provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the            Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing            certifications are accompanying the Company’s Form 10-Q solely pursuant to            section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,            chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form            10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.