alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Abdul AZIZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF the STATE COLLEGE SYSTEM OF WEST VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appel-lee, and Bluefield State College, Defendant.

No. 00-2110.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 15, 2000.

Decided Jan. 12, 2001.

Abdul Aziz, pro se. Kenneth Neil Hick-ox, Jr., Charles R. Bailey, Bailey & Wyant, P.L.L.C., Charleston, WV, for appellee.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Abdul Aziz appeals the district court’s denial of a post-judgment motion Aziz filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). The district court originally granted summary judgment to defendant in this action; this court affirmed that decision. *Aziz v. Board of Directors of the State College Sys. of W.Va.,*No. 99-1502, 1999 WL 734763 (4th Cir. Sept.21, 1999) (unpublished), cer*t. denied,*529 U.S. 1004, 120 S.Ct. 1268,146 L.Ed.2d 218 (2000).

We review denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion. *Eberhardt v. Integrated Design & Constr., Inc.,*167 F.3d 861, 869 (4th Cir.1999). A Rule 60(b) motion is not a substitute for appeal. *In re Burnley,*988 F.2d 1, 3 (4th Cir.1992). Having reviewed the district court’s order denying the motion, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the requested relief. Therefore, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the periodic report of BEA Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Alfred S. Chuang, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Date: April 14, 2006



/s/    ALFRED S. CHUANGAlfred S. ChuangChief Executive Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Percy O. BOYKINS.

No. 2011-KD-1991.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 15, 2011.

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. H, No. 503-527; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1276.

Stay denied. Writ denied.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1287 

To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans from the 

numerical limitations on immigrant visas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2007 

Ms. HIRONO (for herself, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. FILNER, Mr. HONDA, Ms. 

BORDALLO, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. ISSA, Mr. 

FARR, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, Mr. GRIJALVA, and Mr. HARE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans 

from the numerical limitations on immigrant visas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Filipino Veterans 

5 Family Reunification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM IMMIGRANT VISA LIMIT. 

7 Section 201(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151(b)(1)) is amended by adding at the 

9 end the following: 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1287 IH

1 ‘‘(F) Aliens who are eligible for an immigrant 

2 visa under paragraph (1) or (3) of section 203(a) 

3 and who have a parent who was naturalized pursu4 ant to section 405 of the Immigration Act of 1990 

5 (8 U.S.C. 1440 note).’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### In re Shalond Nichelle ESSIX.

No. 2011-B-1277.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 29, 2011.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.*

IjThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter, failed to communicate with a client, failed to refund an unearned fee, and failed to properly terminate the representation of two clients. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Shalond Nichelle Essix, Louisiana Bar Roll number 25665, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year. This suspension shall be deferred in its entirety, subject to respondent’s successful *649completion of a two-year period of supervised probation governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the Petition for Consent Discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent, the ODC, and the probation monitor execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

*

 Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.
EXHIBIT 10.7
                                                                    ------------


                   Article 10 Appendix A for fiscal year 2004
                 Item 3.2 Amendment to CEO Employment Agreement

The  Board  of  Directors  will  make  a  bonus  award  to  the  CEO  based upon
performance.  The  target  bonus  will  be $75,000 and maximum will be $150,000.
Factors  to  be considered are revenue, profit and accomplishment of milestones.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          15,790                  15,790
<SECURITIES>                                    16,085                  16,085
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,171                   3,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                       513                     513
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,675                  44,675
<PP&E>                                           6,787                   6,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                     624                     624
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,255                  66,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,498                   4,498
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,114                  20,114
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            29                      29
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,058                  28,058
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,255                  66,255
<SALES>                                          1,139                   1,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,139                   1,456
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      442                     442
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,662                  46,889
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,358)                (44,281)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,485)                (40,081)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (593)                     672
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,353)                (39,684)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.86)                  (1.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.86)                  (1.44)


</TABLE>
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Carter Praises Hyten’s Nomination as Next STRATCOM Commander

              - Published  Sept. 13, 2016

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  **
In a DoD news release issued today, Defense Secretary Ash Carter praised President Barack Obama’s nomination of Air Force Gen. John E. Hyten to become the next commander of U.S. Strategic Command, based at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska. 

STRATCOM has global strategic missions that include strategic deterrence; space operations; cyberspace operations; joint electronic warfare; global strike; missile defense; intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance; combating weapons of mass destruction; and analysis and targeting, according to defense officials.

Hyten currently serves as the Air Force Space Command commander at Peterson AFB, Colorado. Hyten’s nomination requires Senate confirmation.     
U.S. Strategic Command
Photo Details /                Download Hi-Res

“I want to congratulate Gen. John Hyten on his nomination by President Obama to be commander of U.S. Strategic Command,” Carter said in the release.

**Wide range of roles**

“I've known and worked closely with Gen. Hyten for several years, and over the course of his three-and-a-half decades in the Air Force, he has been a model for generations of men and women in uniform,” the secretary said. “And he's done so in a wide range of roles: from commanding Airmen at the squadron, group, wing, and major command levels, to leveraging America's space assets in support of troops fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, to helping our military confront 21st-century threats in new domains like space and cyberspace.”

Hyten’s 35 years of strong managerial experience, deep technical expertise and visionary leadership, Carter said, makes him “the perfect choice to lead this critical command in the years to come, as the men and women of STRATCOM carry out missions essential to our national defense -- including sustaining nuclear deterrence through a safe, secure, and effective triad, helping defend our networks and deter malicious actors in cyberspace, and preparing for the possibility of a conflict that extends into space.”

Navy Adm. Cecil D. Haney is STRATCOM’s current commander.

Carter said he has confidence that Hyten “will bring to STRATCOM the same high caliber of focus and dedication to defending our country, and taking care of those who do so, that Adm. Cecil Haney has brought to the command over the last three years.”

The secretary added, “I'm grateful to Adm. Haney for his long and distinguished career of service, and I hope the Senate will act swiftly on Gen. Hyten's nomination.”

STRATCOMAFSPCSecDEF

#             Related Links        

-  Air Force Gen. John E. Hyten 
-  Navy Adm. Cecil D. Haney 
-  Stratcom Chief Talks Nuclear Deterrence, Modernization
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Brent W. Christensen, the Chief Financial Officer of Meade
Instruments Corp. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby
certifies that:

(i)    the Form 10-K for the annual period ended February 28, 2003 of the
Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 29, 2003



By: /s/ Brent W. Christensen

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
583 A.2d 311

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HECTOR LUIS CRUZ.

January 23, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Land O'Lakes, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, John E. Gherty, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  March 30, 2004
                                                    By  /s/ John E. Gherty
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    John E. Gherty
                                                    President
                                                    and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM THE
LEARN2.COM INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          13,722
<SECURITIES>                                       407
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,958
<INVENTORY>                                        685
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,151
<PP&E>                                           6,767
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,003
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,671
<BONDS>                                          9,020
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           527
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,003
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,446
<CGS>                                            1,767
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,407
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (113)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,848)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Desmond JOSEPH.

No. 2010-KK-2453.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 17, 2010.

In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. A, Nos. 485-695, 487-860; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-1057.

Denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Theodore Abajian, Chief Financial Officer of CKE Restaurants, Inc. (the
Company), certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
November 1, 2004, of the Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls
over financial reporting. Date: December 17, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Theodore AbajianTheodore AbajianChief Financial Officer
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Critical Days of Summer ends; focus on risk management heightens

              - Published  Sept. 11, 2014
              -                             By Natalie Eslinger                                                    
              - Air Force Safety Center Public Affairs

**KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE, N.M. (AFNS) --  **
During the last holiday weekend of CDS, the Air Force lost two Airmen, one in a private aircraft mishap and the other in a motor vehicle-pedestrian mishap. There were 17 fatalities during the entire CDS period, May 23 through Labor Day weekend, down from 20 for the same period last year. "Fortunately, losses were lower this year, but that's not good enough," said Bill Parsons, the Air Force Chief of Ground Safety. "We have to be unrelenting in our ‘Quest for Zero.’"As we move into fiscal year 2015, our focus will continue to be on our Airmen. We intend to help every Airman understand how risk management factors into everything they do -- on and off duty," Parsons continued. According to safety professionals, most fatalities are preventable. Air Force Ground Safety initiatives for fiscal 2015 include an increased awareness of risk management. "When we all concentrate on every task at hand and consciously consider every risk associated with each task, every one of us becomes central to saving lives and preventing injuries," Parsons said. "Supervisors should continue to stress the use of the risk management tools and the guidance available for every activity. "We need every Airman to weigh every risk before they act, and remember: my job, my life, my choice," Parsons said.

safetyAir Force Safety CenterCritical Days of Summerrisk management