alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 134 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to deny visas and admission 

to aliens who have been unlawfully present in the United States for 

more than 6 months. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. GALLEGLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to deny 

visas and admission to aliens who have been unlawfully 

present in the United States for more than 6 months. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF ALIENS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT 

4 IN THE UNITED STATES FOR MORE THAN 6 

5 MONTHS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 212(a)(9) of the Immi7 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(i)) 

8 is amended by striking subclauses (I) and (II) and insert9 ing the following new subclauses: 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 134 IH

1 ‘‘(I) has been unlawfully present 

2 in the United States for a period of 

3 more than 180 days but less than 1 

4 year is inadmissible unless the alien 

5 has remained outside of the United 

6 States for a period totaling at least 3 

7 years; 

8 ‘‘(II) has been unlawfully present 

9 in the United States for 1 year or 

10 more is inadmissible unless the alien 

11 has remained outside of the United 

12 States for a period totaling at least 10 

13 years.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact16 ment of this Act, except that no period of time before the 

17 date of the enactment of this Act shall be included in the 

18 time period described in section 212(a)(9)(B)(i) of the Im19 migration and Nationality Act (added by such amend20 ment). 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.24




                                 March 5, 2003


Peter Edison


Dear Peter:

         The full year 2002 results ended with a pre-tax profit of $4,109,882.
Unfortunately, this was well below the lowest level where bonus is paid in our
2002 bonus program. I have adjusted the bonus levels as follows for 2003 in
accordance with our new plans.

         The bonus period will be the fiscal months of January 2003 through
December 2003. You must be an employee of Bakers Footwear Group for the full
year to earn your bonus. Your maximum bonus will be 114.3% of your cumulative
salary for this time period. Your bonus will be earned based on the pre-tax
profit (adding back depreciation and bonus) as follows:

<Table>
<S>       <C>                                                                    <C>
   10%    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves a pre-tax profit of   $4,000,000
   20%    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves a pre-tax profit of   $4,250,000
   30%    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves a pre-tax profit of   $4,500,000
   40%    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves a pre-tax profit of   $5,000,000
   50%    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves a pre-tax profit of   $5,500,000
 71.4%    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves a pre-tax profit of   $7,500,000
 92.7%    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves a pre-tax profit of   $8,500,000
114.3%    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves a pre-tax profit of   $9,500,000
</Table>

         Needless to say, we are looking for a strong rebound in profits and
bonus for everyone. Thank you for all your hard work and commitment.


                                                    Sincerely,



                                                    Peter Edison


ss
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1171]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         HONORING JOHN KELLEJIAN

                                 ______

                            HON. BILL BAKER

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, June 7, 1995
  Mr. BAKER of California. Mr. Speaker, on a spring day in 1942, a 
handful of young Americans under the remarkable leadership of Jimmy 
Doolittle flew on a mission that has captivated the hearts and minds of 
Americans ever since. They did what was supposed to have been 
impossible: they successfully flew into Japanese airspace and bombed 
Tokyo.
  One of the men on the famed Doolittle raid was John Kellejian. The 
devotion to duty and steely courage he displayed that memorial day are 
the stuff of legend. John's heroism was honored in May at a Pentagon 
ceremony in which he was recognized for his role in the ``60 seconds 
over Tokyo'' that live on in history. Today, I want to join in 
recognizing John for his contribution to the freedom we enjoy today.
  With his gracious wife, Bev, John is a resident of my hometown of 
Danville, CA, and is commander of the Danville chapter of the Veterans 
of Foreign Wars. His life is a testimony to the virtues of family, 
freedom, and loyalty that have imbued our country with greatness for 
more than two centuries.
  In our country, we seek to commemorate great acts of bravery, and 
well we should. They ennoble our heritage and inspire us in our daily 
lives. Yet our inspiration must be drawn not only from the sacrifices 
of war but from lives well lived in times of peace. John Kellejian's 
bravery made history, and his life helped build a country. He is richly 
deserving of America's thanks for all he has done for his community, 
his State, and his country.

                          ____________________
```
583 A.2d 332

#### A. LI GREGNI AND COMPANY, ETC. v. MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE TOWN OF DOVER AND JOSEPH BLAHOVEC.

March 7, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-43641) of First Industrial, L.P. of our
report dated February 9, 2001 relating to the consolidated financial statements
and of our report dated February 9, 2001 relating to the combined financial
statements of the Other Real Estate Partnerships, which appear in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated February 9, 2001 relating to the financial statement schedule of
First Industrial, L.P., which appears in this Form 10-K.









                                        PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 28, 2001
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S7912]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      EXECUTIVE MESSAGES REFERRED

  As in executive session the Presiding Officer laid before the Senate 
messages from the President of the United States submitting sundry 
nominations which were referred to the Committee on Finance.
  (The nominations received today are printed at the end of the Senate 
proceedings.)

                          ____________________
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
CERTIFICATION
I, Joseph V. Green, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for thequarter ended June 30, 2004 of Winston Hotels, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theCompany and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theCompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: September 7, 2004   /s/ Joseph V. Green   Joseph V. Green Chief Financial Officer
#### G., C. & S. F. R’y Co. v. P. R. Yell.

(No. 2339.)

Appeal from Montgomery County.

B. H. Powell, counsel for appellant.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 366. *Railroad company is liable for negligent acts of its contractors, etc., in surveying, etc., its line of. railway through inclosures; case stated.*Appellant’s agents and employees, in surveying, constructing and building its line of railway through appellee’s inclosed pasture, tore down and injured his fences, causing loss and injury to his stock inclosed in said pasture, and causing him trouble and expense, etc. Appellee brought this suit in justice’s court to recover $200 damages for said negligent acts, and recovered judgment in said court for said amount and costs, and on appeal by appellant to the county court again recovered a like judgment. Appellant’s main defense was, and is, that if any damage was caused appellee by reason of the acts complained of, said acts were done by independent contractors engaged in building appellant’s road, and that appellant is not liable for said acts. *Held:*Appellant, under the statute [R. S. art. 4240 *et*seg.], was bound to construct cattle-guards where its line of road entered said inclosure, and *438maintain the same, and so construct its road as to preserve said inclosure; and its failure to perform this duty-rendered it liable for injuries resulting therefrom, though siich failure was attributable to the negligence of an independent contractor. [R. R. Co. *v.*Meador, 50 Tex. 77; Shear. & Red. on Neg. §§ 83, 84; Wood on Mas. & Ser. § 316.]

March 14, 1888.

Affirmed.
583 A.2d 326

#### AMERICAN STEEL ERECTORS, INC. v. FARMERS’ RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY.

February 26, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
583 A.2d 324

#### CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOY.

February 20, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 237 *N.J.Super.*280, 567 A.2d 597)
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** The Honorable J. Thomas Marten, District Judge, Uni ted States District Court for the District of Kansas, sitting by design ation. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### OCT 28 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
ERNEST DERVON LINDSEY, JR.,

Petitioner-Appellant,
v. RON CHAMPION,

Respondent-Appellee. No. 96-6416 (D.C. No. CIV-95-433-T) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before PORFILIO and LUCERO, Circuit Judges, and MARTEN, ** District Judge.

After examining petitioner’s appellate brief and th e appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argumentwould not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without ora l argument.1 Because petitioner filed his habeas petition in 199 5, before enactment of

the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act o f 1996 (AEDPA), Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat.1214, AEDPA’s certificate of appe alability requirements do not apply to this appeal. SeeUnited States v. Kunzman , ___ F.3d ___, No. 96-1310, 1997 WL 602507, at *1 n.2 (10th Cir. Oct. 1, 1997). Instead, the pre-AEDPA certificate of probable cause requirements apply he re. Regardless of the label we attach to the requirements, petitioner’s substantiv e burden is the same, see Lennox v. Evans , 87 F.3d 431, 434 (10th Cir. 1996), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 746 (1997), overruled in part by , Kunzman , 1997 WL 602507 at *1 n.2, so we will construe his application for a certificate of appea lability as an application for a certificate of probable cause. -2- Petitioner seeks review of the district court’s ord er denying his petition for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Before petit ioner can proceed on appeal, however, he must secure a certificate of probable c ause from this court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. 1 Based upon our review of the record as a whole, w e conclude that petitioner has failed to make a subst antial showing of a denial of a constitutional right.-3-

We, therefore, DENY the application for a certificate of probable cause, and DISMISS the appeal. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court

Carlos F. Lucero Circuit Judge
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

    We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-35774) pertaining to the PRAECIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED
Second Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan, of
our report dated January 24, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of PRAECIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED included in its Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 28, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jonathan Morgan, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First Virtual
Communications, Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

         Dated: November 14, 2003          /s/ Jonathan Morgan
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Jonathan Morgan
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              16,706
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    16,706
<PP&E>                                               1,359
<DEPRECIATION>                                         239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      18,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             4,334
<OTHER-SE>                                          13,733
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        18,067
<SALES>                                             12,675
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    12,675
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       38,121
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (25,446)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (25,446)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0  
<NET-INCOME>                                       (25,446)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.01)
        

                                      

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 186 (Monday, September 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 59258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24081]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-2653-000]


Snowflake Power, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

September 16, 2010.

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Snowflake Power, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 6, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ce888b9c8d81a0a2a7a0ab9dbbbebea1bcba8ea8abbcade0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="70363522333f1e1c191e15230500001f020430161502135e171f06">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24081 Filed 9-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>