alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                             1000


<S>                                            <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000             JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1999             JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                             815                     838
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4084                    2611
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      48385                   47131
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 60598                   58540
<PP&E>                                           53500                   54822
<DEPRECIATION>                                   28104                   28627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   88420                   87127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            30950                   28420
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            70                      70
<OTHER-SE>                                       42736                   41956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     88420                   87127
<SALES>                                          43607                   44203
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 43607                   44203
<CGS>                                            21499                   22927
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    21006                   22343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 328                     247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    774                  (1314)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       302                   (512)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       472                   (802)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.07                 ($0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.07                 ($0.12)


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 15

- 00103

- CV

IN RE Irene ALVARADO

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 11, 2015

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On February 25, 2015

, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial

court’s order striking her petition in intervention and for adoption

. The court has considered

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014

- CVL

- 000326

- D4, styled In the Interest of D.A., A Child , pending in

the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Paul D. Gallego presiding.
#### Sanford BUCHANAN *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 00-271

12 S.W.3d 638

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered March 23, 2000

*Steve J. Jackson,*for appellant.

No response.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Sanford Buchanan, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. The motion reflects that the record on appeal was due to be filed on March 1, 2000, but that it was not tendered until March 3, 2000. Appellant’s attorney, Steve J. Jackson, admits responsibility for tendering the record late.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. *Jones v. State,*338 Ark. 29, 992 S.W.2d 85 (1999) *(per curiam)*(citing *Tarry v. State,*288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 804 (1986) *(per curiam)).*

*691The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. *See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases,*265 Ark. 964 (1979) *(per curiam).*
583 A.2d 317

#### JOAN WANDLAND AND STANLEY WANDLAND v. ERNEST F. ROSATO, M.D.

February 6, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Expert advice on sports medicine now one click awayPublished Oct. 15, 2014
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Under a new partnership between the Air Force Medical Service, or AFMS, and the Human Performance Resource Center, or HPRC, Air Force healthcare providers can now seek expert advice on a variety of sports medicine topics.
HPRC's “Ask the Expert” feature includes sports medicine, physical therapy, exercise physiology, athletic training, nutrition and other human performance optimization topics and is a Defense Department initiative under the Force Health Protection and Readiness Program.
"All Air Force healthcare providers -- whether active duty, Guard, Reserve, civilian, or contractor -- need a solid grounding in sports medicine," said Col. John Oh, the chief of health promotion at the AFMS agency. "Our Airmen need to be fit to fight, and we medics need basic clinical skills in preventing, diagnosing, treating, and rehabilitating musculoskeletal injuries and conditions; referring patients appropriately; and profiling Airmen accurately for work duties and fitness assessments."
Through HPRC's Ask the Expert, providers from any military service can submit questions online and HPRC sports medicine experts will respond via e-mail. The program is not suited for clinical questions that require an urgent response, as the turnaround time may take several days. According to sources, providers are asked not disclose any personal identifying information.
In addition to sports medicine, the program accepts questions on a variety of other health- and performance-related topics, including: nutrition, dietary supplements, family and relationships, environment, mind tactics, and total force fitness.
Based at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences under the Consortium for Health and Military Performance, or CHAMP, HPRC is an online, one-stop clearinghouse for evidence-based information and key resources to help warfighters and their families in all aspects of performance.
"We are excited to partner with the Air Force Medical Service in helping upgrade the knowledge and skills of Air Force and other Military Health System healthcare providers," said Col. Jeff Leggit, the medical director for CHAMP.*(Information provided by the Air Force Surgeon General Public Affairs Office)*Air Force Medical Service 



Force Health Protection and Readiness Program 



healthcare
#### Milburn Manufacturing Co. v. A. D. Tucker.

(No. 5640.)

Appeal from Haskell County.

J. K. Little, counsel for appellant.

No counsel.appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 454. *Statute of frauds; contract held to he not within; ease stated.*One Thomas P. Tucker purchased a buggy and harness of appellant at the price of $229, for which sum he executed his note due six months after date. By the terms of said note the title to said property remained in appellant until said note should be fully paid. The property was delivered to said Tucker, and soon after he acquired it he died intestate. At his death his son, appellee, took possession of said property, and agreed with appellant that he would pay off his father’s note, or. would indorse said note, or would give his own note for the amount, if appellant would let him keep said property; and appellant thereupon permitted him to keep it. *553Appellee, however, thereafter refused to pay said note, or to indorse it, or to give his own in lieu thereof, and still retained and used the property. Appellant brought this suit to recover of him the said price of said property, and upon a trial of the case appellee recovered judgment for his'costs, the trial court holding that his promise to pay for said property, not being in writing, was void under the statute of frauds, because it was a promise to pay the debt of another. [R. S. art. 2464.] *Held:*The judgment is erroneous. In this state it is not necessary that the consideration of a contract to pay the debt of another should be expressed in writing. When one, for a sufficient consideration, agrees to pay the debt due to another by a third party, the agreement is not within the statute of frauds. [Thomas v. Hammond, 47 Tex. 42; 1 App. C. C. § 786.] Again, if the consideration of the promise is the discharge of an existing debt, and the debt is discharged in consequepce of the promise, it is an original contract, which need not be in writing. [Warren v. Smith, 24 Tex. 484; Bason v. Hughart, 2 Tex. 476; 2 App. C. C. § 436.] And if it were conceded that this agreement was within the statute of frauds, another well-settled rule is that, when one refuses to complete an agreement which is void under said statute, after receiving a benefit from part performance, he must pay for what he has received. [Ray v. Young, 13 Tex. 550; Thouvenin v. Lea, 26 Tex. 612.] It would be an iniquitous rule which would allow appellee to keep and use and enjoy appellant’s property without paying therefor, •and when by his own acts he has rendered it impossible for the appellant to be placed *in statu quo*as to the property. The judgment is reversed and here rendered for appellant for the amount sued for, interest and costs. /

April 13, 1889.

Reversed and rendered.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1099-E1100]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 IN COMMEMORATION OF THE 125TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE FOUNDING OF PIO NONO 
COLLEGE AND HIGH SCHOOL AND THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE FOUNDING OF DON 
                           BOSCO HIGH SCHOOL

                                 ______

                         HON. GERALD D. KLECZKA

                              of wisconsin

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 23, 1995
  Mr. KLECZKA. I would like to commemorate the 125th anniversary of the 
founding of Milwaukee's Pio Nono College and High School and the 50th 
anniversary of the founding of my alma mater, Don Bosco High 
School. [[Page E1100]] 
  For more than a century, quality Catholic education has been 
available on Milwaukee's South Side thanks to the traditions forged by 
Pio Nono College and High School and by Don Bosco High School. Although 
these two outstanding schools have since merged to become Milwaukee's 
Thomas More High School, the standards of excellence and commitment to 
Catholic principles which they established remain as strong and true as 
ever.
  Pio Nono College was founded in 1870 and initially trained young men 
in music and teaching. For a time, Pio Nono stood as one of this 
country's foremost centers of Catholic liturgical music. As the 
educational needs of the Milwaukee diocese evolved, the focus of Pio 
Nono changed. Over the years, Pio Nono was transformed into a boarding 
and day school for young men, later into the St. Francis Minor 
Seminary, and by 1965, into Pio Nono High School. Throughout these 
changes, Pio Nono's commitment to providing quality Catholic education 
never wavered.
  By the mid 1940's, the need arose on Milwaukee's South Side for a 
high school serving young men who sought a Catholic education, but who 
were not called to join a seminary. In 1945, Don Bosco High School was 
founded in response to that need. For the next two and a half decades, 
Don Bosco High School, under the guidance of the Marianist order of 
priests and brothers, prepared scores of Milwaukee's young men for the 
lifetime of challenges that lay before them. I am very proud to be 
among those members of our community who received their scholastic and 
spiritual foundation at Don Bosco.
  By the late 1960's, the needs of the Milwaukee diocese had again 
changed, and in 1972, these two institutions were merged into Thomas 
More High School. This year, as we celebrate the 125th anniversary of 
the founding of Pio Nono and the 50th anniversary of the founding of 
Don Bosco, we can be proud that the traditions of those outstanding 
schools are being carried forward into the future by Thomas More. The 
alumni of Pio Nono, Don Bosco, and Thomas More owe a debt of thanks to 
the men and women, past and present, who cared enough to make quality 
and affordable Catholic education available to our community.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 UPDATE: Selfridge ANG Base selected as next location for KC-46A PegasusPublished Jan. 12, 2024
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS)  --**
                The Department of the Air Force selected Selfridge Air National Guard Base, Michigan, as the preferred location to host the next **KC-46A Pegasus** pending the outcome of a planned environmental impact analysis in 2025.
Twelve KC-46As are expected to replace the aging **A-10C Thunderbolt IIs** and **KC-135 Stratotankers** at Selfridge ANGB. The A-10s at Selfridge ANGB are expected to begin divestment in 2026, and the KC-135s there are expected to begin divestment in 2027.
Selfridge ANGB is slated to receive 12 new KC-46s that are projected to start arriving in 2029 and will bring enhanced capabilities, such as boom and drogue refueling on the same sortie, worldwide navigations and communication, cargo capacity on the entire main deck floor, receiver air refueling, improved force protection, and multi-point air refueling capability.
Divesting the aging A-10 fleet and KC-135s and replacing them with the KC-46 ensures Selfridge ANGB has an enduring and modern mission that meets the requirements of the **National Defense Strategy**. Selfridge ANGB is not precluded from being considered for a fighter aircraft mission or other potential missions in the future.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Selfridge ANGB 



KC-46A 



Pegasus 



A-10C 



Thunderbolt II 



KC-135 



Stratotanker 



Air National Guard
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, David E. Ullman, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of my knowledge: 

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the issuer. 

 
| June 6, 2005 | /s/ DAVID E. ULLMAN |
|-------------------|--------------------------|
|              | David E. Ullman     |
|              | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

1

----
581 A.2d 84

#### IN THE MATTER OF ERNEST R. COSTANZO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 25, 1990.

ORDER’

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that ERNEST R. COSTANZO of CAMDEN and CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, be suspended from the practice of law, and said ERNEST R. COSTANZO having been Ordered to Show Cause why he should not be temporarily suspended and sanctioned,

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that ERNEST R. COSTANZO of CAMDEN AND CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, be suspended from the practice of law, and said ERNEST R., COSTANZO having been Ordered to Show Cause why he should not be temporarily suspended and sanctioned,

And said ERNEST R. COSTANZO having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause,

And.good cause appearing;

*406It is ORDERED that ERNEST R. COSTANZO is hereby suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he shall comply with Regulation 23 of the Administrative Guidelines Governing Suspended Attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s reinstatement to the practice of law shall be conditioned on his payment in full of all administrative costs, plus interest, together with a sanction of $250.00.
NOTE: This orderis nonprecedential. 

# muiteb**~tates ~ourt** 

# of§ppeals for !bejf 

# eberal**~ircuit**

OUTSIDE THE BOX INNOVATIONS, LLC (DOING BUSINESSAS UNION RICH USA), Plaintiff-Appellee, and 

### BONAKALIMITED, BONAKA PLASTIC MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., AND 

### UNION RICH PLASTIC FACTORY, LTD., Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, and 

### CHRISTOPHER URE, MATT WILLIAMS, TERRY KINSKEY, AND 

### LYNN MARTINEAU, Counterclaim Defendants,



### v. TRAVEL CADDY, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant. and 

### ROOSTER PRODUCTS (DOING BUSINESSAS THE ROOSTER GROUP), Defendant/ Counterclaimant.

2009-1171OUTSIDE THE BOX v. TRAVEL CADDY 2 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia 

### in case no. 1:05-CV-2482, SeniorJudge Orinda D. Evans.



### OUTSIDE THE 

### BOXINNOVATIONS, LLC (DOING BUSINESS AS UNION RICH USA), Plaintiff-Appellant, 

### and BONAKA LIMITED, BONAKA PLASTIC MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., AND 

### UNION RICH PLASTIC FACTORY, LTD., Counterclaim Defendants, 

### and CHRISTOPHER URE, MATT WILLIAMS, TERRY KINSKEY, AND 

### LYNN MARTINEAU, Counterclaim Defendants,


### v. TRAVEL CADDY, INC., Defendant-Appellee, 

### and ROOSTER PRODUCTS (DOING BUSINESSAS THE ROOSTER GROUP), Defendant.

2009-15583 OUTSIDE THE BOX v. TRAVEL CADDY Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in case no. 1:05-CV-2482, SeniorJudge Orinda D. Evans.
ON MOTION

ORDER Outside the Box Innovations, LLC moves without opposition to dismiss its appeal, 2009-1558. Travel Caddy, Inc. moves without opposition for an extension of time, until March 24,2011, to file its reply briefin 2009-1171. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to dismiss 2009-1558 is granted. Each side shallbearits own costs in 2009-1558. (2) The revised official caption for 2009-1171 IS reflected above. (3) Travel Caddy's motion for an extension of time is granted.



## MAR 08 2011 Date

cc: Robert Byer, Esq. Timothy P. Maloney, Esq. Jeffrey D. Mills, Esq. FORTHE COURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

U.S.

## coUJ~~JPEALS FOIl THE FEDERALCIRCUIT 

## MAR 08 lOll

JANHORBAlY CLERKOUTSIDE THE BOX v. TRAVEL CADDY 4

s20

IssuedAs A Mandate (as to 2009-1558 only): 

## MAR 08 

## 2011
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Paul DePond, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report
of Notify Technology Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Notify Technology Corporation.



By:

/s/    PAUL F.
DEPONDName:

Paul F. DePondTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




I, Gerald W.
Rice, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Notify Technology Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Notify Technology Corporation.



By:

/s/    GERALD W.
RICEName:

Gerald W. RiceTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Notify Technology Corporation and will be retained by Notify Technology Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5738]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                             SPECIAL ORDERS

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of May 
12, 1995, and under a previous order of the House, the following 
Members are recognized for 5 minutes each.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 June issue of Airman magazine now availablePublished June 6, 2016
                        
                        By Airman Magazine Staff
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                The June issue of Airman magazine is now available to download and is viewable through a web browser. 
In the cover story, titled “The Swat Team,” you’ll go behind the scenes with Air Force entomologists and public health Airmen as they learn more about the Zika virus, carried by Aedes mosquitoes, and how to protect from infection. 
In the next feature, you’ll read a story about a small, but highly effective, group of pilot-doctors who bridge the gap between man and machine. Lastly, the magazine pays tribute to Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Welsh III with a final farewell.
Airman magazine provides an interactive experience for tablet readers and a limited interactive version is viewable in web browser format. 
You can download June’s issue of Airman magazine on your tablet here:
- Apple version 
- Android version 
To read this issue on a PC/Mac, click here.
For more stories, visit Airman Online, the website for the official magazine of the U.S. Air Force.Airman magazine 



CSAF 



Zika virus 



medical