alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of CityCenter Holdings, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher Nordling, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ CHRISTOPHER NORDLING                                          |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Christopher   Nordling                                            |   |
| Executive   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer            |   |
| of   Project CC, LLC, managing member of CityCenter Holdings, LLC |   |
| March   23, 2012                                                  |   |

 

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1274 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

amounts awarded to qui tam plaintiffs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2007 

Ms. BERKLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income amounts awarded to qui tam plaintiffs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF AMOUNTS AWARDED TO QUI 

4 TAM PLAINTIFFS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap6 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 

7 items specifically excluded from gross income) is amended 

8 by inserting after section 139A the following new section: 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1274 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 139B. AWARD TO QUI TAM PLAINTIFF. 

2 ‘‘In the case of an individual, gross income does not 

3 include amounts awarded to such individual as a result 

4 of a qui tam action.’’. 

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

6 for such part is amended by inserting after the item relat7 ing to section 139A the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 139B. Award to qui tam plaintiff.’’. 

8 (c) EXTENSION OF PERIOD TO FILE AMENDED RE9 TURN.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an 

10 amended return made during the 3-year period beginning 

11 on the date of the enactment of this Act that includes the 

12 exclusion from gross income under section 139B of such 

13 Code in accordance with the amendment made by sub14 section (a) shall be treated as timely made for purposes 

15 of such Code. 

16 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to amounts awarded to qui tam 

18 plaintiffs on or after January 1, 2002. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
November 1, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David E. Ullman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|December 16, 2003 |  | By: | /s/DAVID E. ULLMANDavid E. Ullman
Chief Financial Officer
|----------------- |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NTL (Triangle) LLC
(the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Barclay
Knapp, as Director of NTL Group Limited, the sole managing member of the
Company, and Scott E. Schubert, as Director of NTL Group Limited, the sole
managing member of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                   
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

/s/ Barclay Knapp

---

Name: Barclay Knapp


Director of NTL Group Limited,
Title: the sole managing member of NTL (Triangle) LLC*

Date:   May 15, 2003

/s/
Scott E. Schubert

---

Name: Scott E. Schubert


Director of NTL Group Limited,
Title: the sole managing member of NTL (Triangle) LLC*

Date:   May 15, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



| 
|-
|*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, September 22, 2010; 2 p.m.-3 p.m.

# PLACE:

 Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# STATUS:

 Closed to the Public.

## Matters To Be Considered

### Compliance Status Report

The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of compliance matters. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: September 14, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-23518 Filed 9-16-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
EXHIBIT 33.2




MANAGEMENT’S ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE




Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Management has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:





Platform:  Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and certain privately issued (i.e., for which transaction-level reporting is required pursuant to contractual obligation) automobile loan or lease-backed securities, equipment loan-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”)





Applicable Servicing Criteria:  All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).





Period:  Twelve months ended December 31, 2012 (the “Period”).





With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:


- The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

- The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

- Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.






CITIBANK, N.A.By: /s/ Karen MontbackIts:  Managing Director





Dated: February 28, 2012
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                 FUSION SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                              EARNINGS PER SHARE
              CALCULATION OF WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
                                (In thousands)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Three Months Ended               Six  Months Ended
                                                                   ------------------------        -------------------------
                                                                    June 27,       June 28,         June 27,        June 28,
                                                                      1997           1996             1997            1996
                                                                   ---------       --------        ---------       --------- 
<S>                                                                   <C>            <C>              <C>             <C>
Primary Shares:

    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding              7,486          7,769            7,478           7,765

     Assuming conversion of options issued and outstanding              308            350              292             324
                                                                   ---------       --------        ---------       --------- 

     Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding                              7,794          8,119            7,770           8,089
                                                                   =========       ========        =========       ========= 

Fully Diluted Shares:

    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding              7,486          7,769            7,478           7,765

     Assuming conversion of options issued and outstanding              445            350              436             324
                                                                   ---------       --------        ---------       --------- 

     Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding                              7,931          8,119            7,914           8,089
                                                                   =========       ========        =========       ========= 

</TABLE>
#### Efrain ARROYAVE, MD, et al., Appellants, v. Gilberto VIVAS, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D10-3024.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 28, 2011.

Efrain Arroyave, MD, and Cali Arroy-ave, in proper persons.

Ferro, Gonzalez <& Associates, P.A., and Pablo Gonzalez Zepeda; Cole Scott *&*Kis-sane, P.A., and Scott A. Cole, Key West, Evan B. Berger, and Jonathan M. Midwall, Miami; Stewart W. Logan, for appellees.

Before RAMIREZ, LAGOA, and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Lay v. Kremer,*411 So.2d 1347, 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (“While mere words do not constitute an assault, the words coupled with an appearance of rage and with a just completed shove could constitute an assault.”).
Exhibit 31.2



Certifications



I, Edward Escudero, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Petro Stopping Centers, L.P.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2004                
|                                     
|/s/ Edward Escudero                  
|(Edward Escudero)                    
|Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HEMASURE INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
   AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                               U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1
<CASH>                                           955
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      6
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,446
<PP&E>                                         3,394
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,052
<BONDS>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         104
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (3,854)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,413
<SALES>                                            4
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   4
<CGS>                                            335
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    335
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,213
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (385)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2,918)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,918)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,918)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
31.2



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND OF

PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULES
13a-14 AND 15d-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
David H. Lesser, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A
    (Amendment No. 1) of Power Reit;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report.



Date:
July 17, 2020



| | By:    | /s/
David H. Lesser                                                                                                                          
| | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:  | David H. Lesser                                                                                                                              
| | Title: | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
        (Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
#### E. L. Gage v. C. L. Nevill.

(No. 4037.)

Appeal from Presidio County.

*("Transferred from, Austin.)*

A. V. D. Old, counsel for appellant.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§27*. *Taxes; illegal action of board of equalization; illegally collected may be recovered bach, when; case stated.*The purpose of this suit was to recover of appellee, as collector of taxes for Presidio county, an alleged excess of taxes on lands paid by appellant, under protest. It is alleged in the petition that the commissioners’ court, sitting as a board of equalization, raised the assessed value of the lands without first classifying the said lands, and without giving notice of the meeting of said court for said purpose as required by law, and that appellee had notice of this unlawful action of said court when he demanded and collected said excess of taxes, and that appellant paid said excess under protest made at the time *333of payment. Exceptions to the petition were sustained, and the suit was dismissed. *Held*error. It is provided hy statute, as preliminary to the exercise of the powers of the commissioners’ court as a board of equalization to raise the assessment on property, to order the county clerk to give the person w'ho rendered the property written notice that they desire to raise the value of the property rendered by him. It is also made the duty of said board to cause the county clerk to give ten days’ notice before their meeting in some newspaper published in the county, or, in case there be no newspaper published in the county, then by posting a written or. printed notice in each justice’s precinct, one of which must be at the courthouse door. [Act March, 1879, Gen. Laws 16th Leg. ch. 47, p. 44.] The written notice to the person who rendered the property, and the ten days’ notice before the meeting of the board, are conditions precedeut to the right of the board to raise the assessment of any person’s property. It being alleged in the petition, and admitted by the exceptions thereto, that the notices required by the statute were not given, the action of the board of equalization in raising the assessment upon appellant’s land was illegal, and the excess of taxes thereby caused was not lawfully collectible. [Cooley on Taxation, pp. 216, 219, 265, 267, 291, 541; R. R. Co. v. Randolph, 24 Tex. 24.] Appellant had the right to maintain a suit to recover the illegal taxes thus paid by him at any time before appellee was compelled by law to pay the same over to the state or county.

March 9, 1887.

Eeversed and remanded.