alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from SEC Form 10-K and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       9,610,190               3,036,238
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,402,685               5,199,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  7,913,777               3,084,168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,091,547              11,333,069
<PP&E>                                     289,211,129             237,801,668
<DEPRECIATION>                            (26,539,539)            (21,008,036)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             310,801,563             275,113,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,283,249              18,457,226
<BONDS>                                    104,521,718             234,608,361
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            10                      10
<OTHER-SE>                                (40,879,506)            (14,788,098)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               310,801,563             275,113,165
<SALES>                                     32,776,493              30,331,515
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,004,162              31,226,783
<CGS>                                       12,050,495               9,347,707
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,583,843              11,169,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,872,532              10,344,460
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,302,645              11,715,929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,754,858)             (2,002,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,754,858)             (2,002,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           (21,336,550)                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (26,091,408)             (2,002,689)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### In re Przemek LUBECKI.

No. 2011-OB-2442.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

ON APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR

PER CURIAM.*

|, After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude petitioner, Przemek Lubecki, is eligible to be admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana.

ADMISSION GRANTED.

*

 Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Michael Durski,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis amended annual report of Force Protection, Inc.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: June 11, 2007 |
|---------------------|
| By:                 | /s/ MICHAEL DURSKI |   |
|                | Michael Durski |
|                | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2


                         DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION
                            2 North Riverside Plaza
                                   Suite 600
                               Chicago, IL 60606



                                December 1, 2003



Equity Group Investments, L.L.C.
2 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 600
Chicago, IL 60606

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to the action and request of the Special Committee of Disinterested
Directors of the Board of Directors of Danielson Holding Corporation (the
"Company"), in connection with the Company's negotiation of an agreement to
acquire certain businesses of Covanta Energy Corporation, this letter confirms
your agreement to terminate, effective immediately, that certain letter
agreement dated April 19, 1999 between you and the Company relating to the
provision of consulting and advisory services to the Company, other than your
rights to indemnification under paragraph 4 of that letter agreement, which
rights shall continue.

                                      Danielson Holding Corporation

                                      /s/ Philip G. Tinkler
                                      -------------------------------
                                      By:     Philip G. Tinkler
                                              Chief Financial Officer

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED
as of this 1st day of December, 2003

Equity Group Investments, L.L.C.


By: /s/ Donald Liebentritt
    ----------------------
Its: President
     ---------------------
| 1.   | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Unity Bancorp, Inc; |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5.   | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Date:  November 9, 2010 |                                                           |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Alan J. Bedner, Jr.Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viewpoint Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Robert E. Rice, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

(1)  The Report to which this certification is attached as an exhibit, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                      |  |     |  |                                                                         
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  June 27, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ ROBERT E. RICE

Robert E. Rice
President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 70 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4437]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                             SPECIAL ORDERS

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of 
January 4, 1995, and under a previous order of the House, the following 
Members will be recognized for 5 minutes each.

                          ____________________
```
#### THAN WIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D11-2697.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2011.

*909Matt Shirk, Public Defender, Fourth Judicial Circuit, and Richard B. Gordon, Assistant Public Defender, Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition is granted and Than Win is hereby afforded a belated appeal from judgment and sentence in Duval County case number 2010-CF-7242-A. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of the opinion will be provided to the clerk of the circuit court who shall treat it as a notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

The circuit court is directed to appoint counsel to represent petitioner in the appeal if he qualifies for such an appointment.

PETITION GRANTED.

DAVIS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                         Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

      In connection with the Quarterly  Report of First Virtual  Communications,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Gregory  Sterling,  Chief  Restructuring  Officer of the Company,
certify,  to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to Exchange Act Rule  15d-14(b)
and 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      i.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      ii.   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section 906, has been  provided to First Virtual
Communications,  Inc. and will be retained by First Virtual Communications, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.

Date: November 28, 2005                  FIRST VIRTUAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

                                         By: /s/ Gregory Sterling
                                             ----------------------------
                                             Gregory Sterling
                                             Chief Restructuring Officer
                                             (Duly Authorized Officer and
                                             Principal Financial Officer)
#### St. Louis, Ark. & Tex. R’y Co. v. Sam Heard et al.

(No. 2988.)

November 21, 1888.

Appeal from Navarro County.

Clark, Dyer & Bolinger, counsel for appellant.

Simkins & Neblett, counsel for appellees.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 397. *Parties plaintiff; in suit for damage to crop of tenant, landlord is not a necessary party plaintiff.*Appellees sued áppella'nt for damages to their crops of corn and cotton caused by the depredations of stock, said depredations being the result of a failure by appellant to construct and maintain suitable cattle-guards, etc. They recovered judgment for the sum of $316 and costs.

It appeared from the evidence that appellees were the tenants of one Ferguson; that the crops damaged belonged to them, but were growing upon Ferguson’s land which they had rented; and that, by the rent contract, said Ferguson was to receive as rent a certain portion of said crops. Appellant moved to dismiss the suit upon the ground that Ferguson was jointly interested in the subject-matter of the suit, and was a necessary party plaintiff, which motion was overruled. *Held:*Ferguson was not a necessary party to the suit. He acquired no title to the part of the crops reserved for rent until' the same had been set apart to him by the tenants, and was not, therefore, jointly interested with appellees in said crops. [Pace v. Sparks, Posey’s U. C. 402, and authorities there cited.] The cases cited by appellant in support of its position that Ferguson is a necessary party to this suit are not in point. [2 App. C. C. § 173; ante, § 317.]

Affirmed.
News United States Air Force
 AF, Marine and Army EOD techs train, learn from each otherPublished Dec. 28, 2015
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Jerilyn Quintanilla
                        
                        
                        386th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs
                **SOUTHWEST ASIA (AFNS) --**
                Air Force, Marine and Army explosive ordnance disposal technicians from throughout the area of responsibility came together for the first time to train at an undisclosed location Dec. 14-18.The five-day training exercise included more than 40 staged improvised explosive device scenarios simulating common incidents EOD has encountered in Iraq and Afghanistan.“The purpose of the exercise was to bring EOD from our sister services together so we can learn from each other,” said Capt. Rachel Rupp, the 386th EOD flight chief. “Sharing tactics, techniques and procedures as well as lessons learned from our more seasoned team leads and observer controllers is one of the best ways we can teach and learn from each other.”Experience in the EOD field is invaluable and with more than 40 technicians participating in the exercise, the years of experience among them equated to more than 230 years.“No one can know everything so when we bring people together with such a wide range of experience it creates a great dynamic and force multiplier,” said Tech. Sgt. James Kucinski, an EOD team lead. “All of a sudden, you have one team where each member brings a different skill set and expertise to the table. That’s when we’re at our best.“When EOD teams get together we tell war stories, not to brag but to share,” Kucinski continued. “We tell younger team leads to listen up because the stuff senior team leads talk about, what they did in a specific situation, what their approach was, how they decided on that course of action — those things aren’t in the books.”Throughout the exercise the generation gap between veteran and rookie EOD techs was evident. However, Marine Gunnery Sgt. Brian Murphy, an EOD team leader deployed from Camp Pendleton, Calif., saw it as a great advantage for all players.“The younger (EOD technicians and team leads) are very smart,” Murphy said. “It is fun to see that light bulb come on as we’re going through a scenario, and it’s amazing to watch them capitalize on it and make it even better. It was a great opportunity for me to learn from them as well.”It is only within the walls of the EOD world that you’re able to witness the bond that transcends one’s branch of service.“It’s one of the things that makes the EOD community sometimes feels like a separate service in and of itself,” Murphy said. “No matter what uniform we wear, we speak and relate to each other as EOD first.”AFCENT 



Operation Inherent Resolve 



USCENTCOM 



OIR 



explosive ordnance disposal 



EOD 



Joint Training
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1169]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  REINTRODUCTION OF LEGISLATION REQUESTING ACQUISITION OF WAIHEE MARSH 
                               (H.R. 429)

                                 ______

                           HON. PATSY T. MINK

                               of hawaii

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, June 7, 1995
  Mrs. MINK of Hawaii. Mr. Speaker, I introduced H.R. 429 at the 
beginning of the 104th Congress which requests the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service [FWS] to acquire the Waihee Marsh wetland and to 
establish a conservation easement on both sides of Waihee Stream 
located at Kahaluu, Island of Oahu, State of Hawaii. I developed the 
legislation at the request of a member of the county council of the 
city and county of Honolulu.
  Thirty acres of the Waihee Marsh are currently on the 2-year priority 
acquisition list of FWS. The wetland functions as a flood control area 
and filtration system that protects adjacent lands and Kaneohe Bay. The 
marsh also serves as primary habitat for endangered water birds and 
migratory shorebirds. Community support is widespread for this proposed 
acquisition.
  The Waihee Stream parcel proposed for acquisition had been 
recommended for conservation by the Kaneohe Bay Task Force, which 
maintained that the creation of a 100-foot buffer area around the 
stream would protect water quality and prevent flooding.
  However, property owners of lands along Waihee Stream are concerned 
and opposed to the acquisition of the conservation easement. Because of 
this protest, I am deleting this particular provision from the bill, 
and resubmitting it for the marsh area alone.
  I urge support of the Waihee Marsh, and urge its inclusion in the 
fiscal year 1996 budget for acquisition.

                          ____________________
```