alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1176 

To provide discretionary authority to an immigration judge to determine 

that an alien parent of a United States citizen child should not be 

ordered removed, deported, or excluded from the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. SERRANO (for himself, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. TOWNS, and Mr. NADLER) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide discretionary authority to an immigration judge 

to determine that an alien parent of a United States 

citizen child should not be ordered removed, deported, 

or excluded from the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT 

4 TO REMOVAL, DEPORTATION, OR EXCLUSION 

5 OF PARENTS OF CITIZEN CHILDREN. 

6 Section 240(c)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a(c)(4)) is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following: 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 1176 IH

1 ‘‘(D) DISCRETION OF JUDGE IN CASE OF

2 CITIZEN CHILD.—In the case of an alien subject 

3 to removal, deportation, or exclusion who is the 

4 parent of a child who is a citizen of the United 

5 States, the immigration judge may exercise dis6 cretion to decline to order the alien removed, 

7 deported or excluded from the United States if 

8 the judge determines that such removal, depor9 tation, or exclusion is clearly against the best 

10 interests of the child, except that this subpara11 graph shall not apply to any alien who the 

12 judge determines— 

13 ‘‘(i) is described in section 212(a)(3) 

14 or 237(a)(4); or 

15 ‘‘(ii) has engaged in conduct described 

16 in paragraph (8) or (9) of section 103 of 

17 the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 

18 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102).’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
583 A.2d 349

#### IN THE MATTER OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1988 AND SEPTEMBER 21, 1988 EMERGENCY REDIRECTION OF SOLID WASTE FLOW. BERGEN COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY, ET AL. AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES, ET AL. v. SAL-CAR TRANSFER SYSTEMS, INC. v. BERGEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS.

March 30, 1990.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1934-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Missouri (FEMA-1934-DR), dated August 17, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 20, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Missouri is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of August 17, 2010.

Perry County for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters);

97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-24014 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SUPERGEN.
INC SEPTEMBER 30,2000 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          86,190
<SECURITIES>                                    20,300
<RECEIVABLES>                                      552
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                      1,435
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,111
<PP&E>                                           5,240
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 176,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,701
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       287,187
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,961)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   176,126
<SALES>                                          4,006
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,743
<CGS>                                              938
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,114
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,340)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,340)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,340)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.81)


</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1265 

To amend the Small Business Act to authorize the Administrator of the 

Small Business Administration to award contracts to small business 

concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans under the 

section 8(a) program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2007 

Mr. BUYER (for himself and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to authorize the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to award 

contracts to small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans under the section 8(a) 

program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Service-Disabled Vet5 eran-Owned Small Business Equity Act of 2007’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1265 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO AWARD CONTRACTS UNDER 8(a) 

2 PROGRAM TO SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS 

3 OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY SERVICE-DIS4 ABLED VETERANS. 

5 Section 8 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637) 

6 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub7 section: 

8 ‘‘(o) SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS OWNED AND CON9 TROLLED BY SERVICE-DISABLED VETERANS.— 

10 ‘‘(1) AWARD OF CONTRACTS.—The Adminis11 trator may award a contract under subsection (a) to 

12 a small business concern owned and controlled by 

13 service-disabled veterans on the same basis as a con14 tract awarded under that subsection to a socially 

15 and economically disadvantaged small business con16 cern. 

17 ‘‘(2) ANNUAL CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.—The 

18 Administrator shall require each small business con19 cern owned and controlled by service-disabled vet20 erans that is a Program Participant under section 

21 7(j)(15) or that is awarded a contract under sub22 section (a) to certify, on an annual basis, that such 

23 concern is a small business concern owned and con24 trolled by service-disabled veterans within the mean25 ing of section 3(q). 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1265 IH

1 ‘‘(3) DISADVANTAGED OWNER.—For purposes 

2 of this section, in the case of a small business con3 cern owned and controlled by service-disabled vet4 erans, the term ‘disadvantaged owner’ means an 

5 owner who is a service-disabled veteran.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### Wm. Bryan v. Geo. F. Alford.

(No. 1094, Op. Book No. 3, p. 443.)

Appeal from Dallas County.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§85. *Lis pendens; plea in abatement.*The rule of law which abates a suit on account of the pending of another suit, requires that the two suits shall be for the same cause of action. This rule is applied and enforced, because the plaintiff who has instituted the first suit is enabled to obtain the full benefit of judicial redress in that suit. It does not operate to restrict or restrain either party from the maintenance of any additional suit or suits besides the original súit, essential to the protec*37tion or enforcement of a right which may not be assured in the suit first brought.

February 2, 1881.

Affirmed.
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 41 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to clarify 

that the Constitution neither prohibits voluntary prayer nor requires 

prayer in schools. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2007 

Mr. RAHALL introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to clarify that the Constitution neither prohibits 

voluntary prayer nor requires prayer in schools. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 by the Congress: 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 41 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

2 ‘‘Nothing in this Constitution, including any amend3 ment to this Constitution, shall be construed to prohibit 

4 voluntary prayer or require prayer in a public school, or 

5 to prohibit voluntary prayer or require prayer at a public 

6 school extracurricular activity.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1208]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                   CONGRATULATIONS DR. GEORGE MITCHELL

                                 ______

                           HON. GLENN POSHARD

                              of illinois

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, June 8, 1995
  Mr. POSHARD. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to pay special tribute to Dr. 
George Mitchell of Marshall, IL. On May 19, 1995, Dr. Mitchell was 
given the National Rural Health Association's Rural Health Practioner 
of the Year Award. The ceremony was part of the 18th Annual National 
Conference that was held in Atlanta, GA. The people of southeastern 
Illinois have known for over four decades of Dr. Mitchell's award 
winning contributions, and now the entire Nation does as well.
  This is not the first time Dr. Mitchell has been recognized for his 
dedicated service to the people of rural Illinois. In 1993, he was 
awarded the Illinois Academy of Family Physicians' Family Physician of 
the Year Award. In 1992, he was honored with the Distinguished Service 
Award from Lake Land College. In addition, the Illinois State Senate 
honored him for his ``commitment to public service in the State of 
Illinois.''
  Since 1946, Dr. George Mitchell has provided quality health care to 
the people of southeastern Illinois. Dr. Mitchell has worked 49 years 
with his community to help improve the lives of his friends and 
neighbors. Whether he is called upon to aid the ill, or to help ensure 
that the area has an organized and effective ambulance service, Dr. 
Mitchell is always willing to help the people of Clark County.
  Mr. Speaker, Dr. Mitchell's lifelong commitment to patient care, 
community involvement, and continued contributions to his profession 
led to his being chosen as this year's National Rural Health 
Practitioner. For decades Dr. Mitchell has given of himself, so that 
others are able to live a better life. Dr. George Mitchell is an 
outstanding individual, and I am proud to represent him in the U.S. 
Congress.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,

Board Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-23706 Filed 9-17-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE P
578 A.2d 1226

#### IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL E. CUNNINGHAM, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

September 12, 1990.

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

CONSENT ORDER

' THIS MATTER, having been opened to the Court by DAVID E. JOHNSON, JR., Director, Office of Attorney Ethics, and with the consent of the Respondent, Michael E. Cunningham, of Brick and Spring Lake, and Charles M. Moriarty, respondent’s counsel, and it appearing that the Office of Attorney Ethics and Respondent having agreed to Respondent being temporarily suspended from the practice of law, together with the additional relief provided in this Order, pending final disposition of all ethics grievances before the District XIV Ethics Committee,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Michael E. Cunningham of Brick and Spring Lake, admitted to practice in this State in 1972, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, pending final determination of all grievances, and until further Order of the Court.

2. The Office of Attorney Ethics takes such protective action pursuant to *R.*1:20-11(c), as may be appropriate to gain possession and control of the legal files, records, practice and trust assets of Michael E. Cunningham wherever situate.

3. All funds, if any, presently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by Michael E. Cunningham pursuant to *R.*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement and shall be transmitted by the banks which are the present custodians thereof to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of this Court.

*1894. Michael E. Cunningham is hereby restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension.

5. Michael E. Cunningham is hereby restrained and enjoined from disbursing funds from any of the foregoing bank accounts.

6. Michael E. Cunningham shall comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics governing suspended, disbarred or resigned attorneys.
#### Adele Steinback v. J. Weill & Bro.

(No. 1608, Op. Book No. 2, p. 116.)

Appeal from Williamson County.

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 934. *Husband and wife; cannot be partners in mercantile business.*The law of this state does not recognize commercial partnerships between husband and wife. It is the duty of the courts to repudiate such a relation between man and wife, as the marital relation has become sufficiently complicated already, without adding that of mercantile partnership or anything like it. [Wallace v. Finberg, 46 Tex. 44.]

§ 935. *Husband and wife; judgment against tvife.*The husband is a necessary party to any judgment ren*526dered against the wife. [Pas. Dig. 4644, 4646; R. S. 2855-2857; Taylor v. Murphy, 50 Tex. 291.]

May 22, 1880.

§ 93G. *Married woman;- liability of, for debt.*A married woman who conducts a mercantile business in her own name, or who is a member of a mercantile firm, is not liable for goods sold to her or to the firm to carry on such business. Such a debt is not for necessaries furnished herself or family, and is not incurred for the benefit of her separate property. [Wallace v. Finberg, 46 Tex. 44.]

Reversed and remanded.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 2, 2017

NO. 03

- 17

- 00270

- CR

Joe Michael Magana, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBER TON, AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed

the record, i t appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Schedule of Employment Agreements



 EXHIBIT 10(a)(4) 
  
 SCHEDULE OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS 
  

	 	  	Form of
Contract


	 William F. Schwer
	  	A
	 W.J. “Duffy” Smith
	  	B
	 Robert A. Peiser
	  	C
583 A.2d 329

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PAUL J. SENGHAAS AND ANTOINETTE G. EGBERT.

February 27, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Forging the KC-46: New training center opens to prepare tanker aircrewsPublished Aug. 31, 2016
                        
                        By Senior Airman Dillon Davis
                        
                        
                        97th Air Mobility Wing Public Affairs
                **ALTUS AIR FORCE BASE, Okla. (AFNS) --**
                A new training center for the KC-46 Pegasus was officially dedicated here Aug. 30, along with the activation of the 56th Air Refueling Squadron, which will be the formal training unit for the Air Force’s next-generation refueling aircraft.The integration of the KC-46 into the Air Force is one of the top three aircraft modernization programs intended to maintain global vigilance, reach and power.“Today’s event marks an important milestone for (Air Education and Training Command) and the United States Air Force,” said Lt. Gen. Darryl Roberson, the AETC commander. “Safety, proficiency and the ability to make the complex seem routine were the hallmark of the Air Force’s refueling training with Altus (Air Force Base) leading the way. Today, we stand again, on the shoulders of giants, as we reach a new milestone in dedicating our newest formal training unit, the 56th ARS.”The new center, named the Leverett Formal Training Center, will be vital to future Air Force aerial refueling and joint service operations since it will serve as the first stop for all KC-46 aircrew members.“Members of the 56th ARS are AETC’s and the Air Force’s first KC-46 aircrew members,” said Lt. Col. Daniel Ruttenber, who assumed command of the unit. “The 56th ARS activation and dedication of the formal training unit is truly a paradigm shift in air refueling and continuation of the long tradition of the 56th (ARS)."Community partners made a point to recognize the unique partnership between Altus AFB and the city of Altus.“With the KC-46 coming to Altus, a lot of good things are going to happen and it’s all thanks to the community,” said U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe from Oklahoma.The 56th ARS will begin training aircrew members this fall. KC-46 aircrew students train using pilot and boom operator simulators to conduct hands-on training before in-flight training missions.Altus AFB 



Oklahoma 



KC-46 



training 



AMC 



air refueling
#### SUCCESSION OF Agnes Wylonda Johnson CARROLL.

No. 2011-C-1844.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Cagle, Donna Cruse; Cruse, Tommy et al.; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Union, 3rd Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 9408; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,327-CA.

Not considered, not timely filed.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of Coastal Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-Q  for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on August 8, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Manuel
J.  Mehos,  Chairman  of  the  Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:     8/8/03                            By     /s/  Manuel  J. Mehos
           ------                                   ---------------------
                                             Manuel  J.  Mehos
                                             Chairman  of  the  Board  and Chief
                                             Executive  Officer


(A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Coastal Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Coastal Bancorp, Inc.
and  furnished  to  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.)


<PAGE>