alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
OF ADVOCAT INC.
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
  (a)
    
    fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  /s/ William R. Council, IIIWilliam R. Council, IIIChief Executive Officer/s/ L. Glynn Riddle, Jr.L. Glynn Riddle, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of The SUCCESSION OF Wilda Jean Barnett HUTCHINSON.

No. 2010-CC-2733.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 4, 2011.

In re Landrum, Susan Barnett; —Other; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 13,505; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 1593.

Denied.
#### Daemon REIYDELL and Billie Hensky Reiydell, Appellants, v. TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK, Appellee.

No. 1D11-0542.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 21, 2011.

Ryan M. Barnett of Whibbs & Stone, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellants.

Jeffrey L. Burns of Anchors Smith Grimsley, PLC, Fort Walton Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the Appellants’ response to the Court’s order of March 28, 2011, the Court has determined that the appeal is premature. *See Conti v. B & E Holdings, LLC, et al.,*61 So.3d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot.

DAVIS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of
Petro Financial Corporation (the Company), that to his knowledge:



(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This written statement is being furnished to the SEC as an
exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 11, 2005 |  | /s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.               
|                        |  | (J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)                 
|                        |  | President and Director               
|                        | 
|Date: November 11, 2005 |  | /s/ Edward Escudero                  
|                        |  | (Edward Escudero)                    
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         584,722
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,271
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (32,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    152,428
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               798,231
<PP&E>                                         586,729
<DEPRECIATION>                                 410,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,413,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          356,795
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       134,425
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,922,428
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,413,648
<SALES>                                        143,490
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,658,490
<CGS>                                          102,061
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,642,918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,730
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (938,382)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (938,382)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (938,382)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Aug. 5Published Aug. 5, 2016
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Traci Keller
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- On this look around the Air Force, B-1B Lancers deploy to Guam; a new issue of Airman magazine is out and features U-2 pilots; and in Germany, seven nations participated in International Jump Week. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Traci Keller.
For previous episodes, click here.
Related links:
- B-1s to replace B-52s during routine bomber presence rotation
- Boiling point: U-2 pilots operate at the edge of space
- US, allies join forces for International Jump WeekATAF 



B-1B 



Guam 



Andersen AFB 



U-2 



Airman magazine 



international jump week 



Germany 



paratroopers 



AFGSC
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 Nos. 333-35774 and 333-90734) pertaining to the PRAECIS
PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED Second Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Plan, as
amended, and Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, of our report dated
January 22, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
PRAECIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 14, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                         Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

      In connection with the Quarterly  Report of First Virtual  Communications,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2004,  as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Gregory  Sterling,  Chief  Restructuring  Officer of the Company,
certify,  to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to Exchange Act Rule  15d-14(b)
and 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      i.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      ii.   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section 906, has been  provided to First Virtual
Communications,  Inc. and will be retained by First Virtual Communications, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.

Date: November 28, 2005                  FIRST VIRTUAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

                                         By: /s/ Gregory Sterling
                                             ----------------------------
                                             Gregory Sterling
                                             Chief Restructuring Officer
                                             (Duly Authorized Officer and
                                             Principal Financial Officer)
#### STATE ex rel. Donald W. HOLTON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-2590.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Holton, Donald W.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 17863; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 1301.

Denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0268]

# AGENCY:

 Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

                    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an amendment to the notice of meeting of the Dental Products Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee. This meeting was announced in the                     **Federal Register**                     of June 11, 2010 (75 FR 33315). The amendment is being made to reflect a change in the                     *Agenda*                     portion of the document. There are no other changes.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Olga I. Claudio, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. 1553, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-7608, or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington DC area), code 3014512518. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date information on this meeting.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of June 11, 2010, FDA announced that a meeting of the Dental Products Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee would be held on December 14 and 15, 2010. On page 33316, in the first column, in the                     *Agenda*                     portion of the document, in the second full paragraph, in the second sentence, the phrase “(docket numbers FDA-2008-N-0163 and FDA-2009-P-0357)” is changed to read as follows:                

“(docket numbers FDA-2008-N-0163, FDA-2009-P-0357, and FDA-2010-P-0056-0001)” 

This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14, relating to the advisory committees.

Dated: September 21, 2010.

Jill Hartzler Warner,

Acting Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.

[FR Doc. 2010-23914 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
758 A.2d 656

#### In the Matter of Brenda Joyce HAMER.

No. 599 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Aug. 3, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2000, a Rule having been entered by this Court on June 28, 2000, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Brenda Joyce Hamer to show cause why she should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Brenda Joyce Hamer is placed on temporary suspension and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.
#### DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT, etc., Appellant, v. Travis MAGRUM, Appellee.

No. 5D10-2391.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 21, 2011.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

After careful consideration of the record, we hold that the Department of Revenue is correct in its assertion that the circuit court’s final judgment on the Department’s Petition for Enforcement of Administrative Support Order did not prospectively change the child support amount established in the earlier Administrative Support Order and thus, pursuant to section 409.2568(10)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), the final judgment could not “supersede” the administrative order.

Accordingly, we affirm the Final Judgment on Petition for Enforcement of Administrative Support Order in all respects except in regard to the lower court’s attempt to have the final judgment supersede the administrative order. We remand to the circuit court with instructions to strike this provision.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

MONACO, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
#### STANLEY ARRINGTON *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 22716)

Schaller, West and Dupont, Js.

Submitted on briefs May 2

officially released May 20, 2003

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-8036

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RASHADI ANDRE WEARING,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, 

Senior District Judge. (3:04-cr-00092-NKM-8; 3:13-cv-80561-NKMRSB)

Submitted: March 27, 2014 Decided: April 1, 2014

Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rashadi Andre Wearing, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, 

Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Rashadi Andre Wearing seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Wearing has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FVC.COM FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             800
<SECURITIES>                                    11,420
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                       474
<INVENTORY>                                     11,981
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,212
<PP&E>                                           5,717
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,346
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,662
<SALES>                                         10,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,624
<CGS>                                            5,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,777
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,240
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    70
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,018)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,018)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,018)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATIONS OF


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, David J. Drutz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-Q of DARA BioSciences, Inc.  for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of DARA BioSciences, Inc.






By:
/s/ David J. DrutzDavid J. DrutzChief Executive OfficerDate: August 14, 2012


I, David L. Tousley, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-Q of DARA BioSciences, Inc.  for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of DARA BioSciences, Inc.




By:
/s/ David L. TousleyDavid L. TousleyActing Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 14, 2012
#### ANTHONY DENNISTON *v.*CASH HOME CENTER, INC.

(AC 22424)

Schaller, Flynn and Dupont, Js.

Argued March 27

officially released April 15, 2003

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1236 

To make permanent the authority of the United States Postal Service to 

issue a special postage stamp to support breast cancer research. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2007 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees 

on Energy and Commerce and Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To make permanent the authority of the United States Postal Service to issue a special postage stamp to support 

breast cancer research. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY. 

4 Section 414 of title 39, United States Code, is 

5 amended by striking subsection (h). 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS