alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NOVA
INTERNATIONAL FILMS, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
July 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                          2,405
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,405
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           11,424
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        966
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      8,197,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,405
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                10
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                6,898
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (6,888)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (6,888)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (6,888)
<EPS-BASIC>                   .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .000



</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 16, 2014

NO. 03-12-00032-CR

Jeffrey Sharp, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE, AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the 

court below.
763 A.2d 355

#### In the Matter of Robin CLELAND. Petition for Reinstatement from Inactive Status.

No. 87 DB 2000.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Oct. 30, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of October, 2000, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme *527Court of Pennsylvania dated September 28, 2000, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that ROBIN CLELAND, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.
News United States Air Force
 Officers, civilians selected for developmental education opportunityPublished Nov. 25, 2014
                        
                        By Debbie Gildea
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The 2014 Intermediate, Senior, and Civilian Developmental Education Designation Board held Oct. 21 selected 796 officers and 150 civilians for intermediate and senior developmental education, Air Force Personnel Center officials announced Nov. 24.
"Developmental education supports the continuum of education necessary to develop strategic leaders who will ensure the future force is trained, equipped and ready for the challenges ahead.  As a result, selection is a very competitive and deliberate process," said Master Sgt. Kimberlyn Smith, the AFPC military developmental education superintendent.
This year, 10,466 eligible officers were considered for 796 slots.
Selection for civilian intermediate and senior developmental education slots is also very competitive, and from 487 candidates, 123 primary and 27 alternates were selected, according to Loretta Brown, with the AFPC Civilian Force Integration Directorate Leadership Development branch. 
In addition to IDE and SDE, the Air Force also selected civilian Airmen for basic developmental education. BDE selections for Civilian Acculturation and Leadership Training, Squadron Officer School, Defense Civilian Emerging Leader Program, Education with Industry and the Air Command and Staff College Online Master's Program are vetted through the career field and developmental teams for final selections. 
"All DE selections are based on employees' potential to help guide the Air Force toward mission accomplishment," Brown said. "These developmental opportunities are critical to ensure civilian leaders are fully-integrated in leadership and decision-making teams."
Airmen selected for IDE and SDE will attend advanced training and senior leader development programs including Air War College, the Executive Leadership Development Program and more.
For more information about developmental education opportunities and to see the list of selectees, go to myPers, select "Search All Components" from the drop down menu and enter "CY14 Intermediate and Senior Developmental Education (IDE/SDE) Designation Board and Civilian Developmental Education (CDE) Designation Board Results" in the search window.
Air Force retirees who do not have a myPers account can request one at www.retirees.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-120510-068.pdf.officer 



civilian 



career 



developmental education 



 



AFPC
760 A.2d 848

#### Frank J. MAZUREK, Respondent, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Nov. 1, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Commonwealth Court is reversed and the case is remanded for proceedings consistent with *Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation v. McCafferty,*563 Pa. 146, 758 A.2d 1155 (2000).
KINGS ROAD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
                             A Delaware corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kings Road Entertainment, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2005 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Geraldine Blecker, Chief Executive Officer, and I, H. Martin DeFrank, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant
to SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authentication, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed from within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kings Road
Entertainment, Inc., and will be retained by Kings Road Entertainment, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: October 31, 2005                    /s/ Geraldine Blecker
                                           _________________________________
                                           By:  Geraldine Blecker
                                           Its: Chief Executive Officer



Dated: October 31, 2005                    /s/ H. Martin DeFrank
                                           _________________________________
                                           By:   H. Martin DeFrank
                                           Its:  Chief Financial Officer
#### A. T. Forst v. F. Mayer.

(No. 5637.)

April 10, 1889.

Appeal from Menard County.

Marshall Fulton and J. A. Smith, counsel for appellant.

H. M* Holmes .and J. M. Moore, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§450. *Appeal from justice’s court; certified copy of bill of costs; transcript held sufficient.*Appellee having recovered a judgment against appellant in justice’s court, the latter appealed to the county court, and the appeal was dismissed on motion of appellee, upon the ground that the transcript w-as not accompanied by a certified copy of the bill of costs taken from the justice’s fee-book, as inquired by ax-tide 1640, Revised Statutes. While there is xxo certified copy of the bill of costs separate from the transcript, there is a bill of costs amounting to $23.55 in the transcript, and following it a certificate of the justice that the transcript is .a true one of all the entries on his docket, etc. *Held:*There was a substantial compliance with said article 1640, and the court erred in dismissing the appeal.

Reversed and remanded.
583 A.2d 322

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BEN-SIYON BRASCH.

February 14, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Raymond C. TOTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES, Alicia Wheeler, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-7348.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 4, 2001.

Raymond C. Toth, Paterson, NJ, pro se.

Joseph E. Field, Winick & Rich, N.Y., NY, for appellees.

Present OAKES, KEARSE and WINTER, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and was argued by plaintiff *pro se*and by counsel for defendants.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in then-Chief Judge Griesa’s Order of Dismissal dated March 10, 2000. We have considered all of plaintiffs contentions on this appeal and have found in them no basis for reversing the decision of the district court. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

We note that although plaintiff has failed to exhaust his claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001*et seq.,*and hence cannot maintain the present action under that Act, the defendant insurance company (“defendant”) has now informed plaintiff and this Court that defendant has given plaintiff until December 31, 2000, to submit any additional documentation he wishes in support of his disability benefits claim, and that defendant will issue a final determination of that claim on or before January 31, 2001.
[No. 18360-2-III.

Division Three.

May 16, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jesus Sanchez Gil, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 98-1-01916-1, Heather K. Van Nuys, J., entered March 12, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, C.J., concurred in by Sweeney and Brown, JJ.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: New Space Force Leader, Flying While Pregnant, Mobility Study Targets InjuriesPublished Nov. 11, 2022
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Kahdija Slaughter
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)   --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, the Space Force has a new leader, more information is available to help aircrew members make an informed decision about flying while pregnant, and the Air Force Research Lab helps Airmen avoid injuries. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Jazmin Granger)





For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- Saltzman formally elevated to Space Force’s highest position – Chief of Space Operations****- AF provides additional information for aircrew considering flying during their pregnancy****- AF ‘Movement’ study could lead to healthier Airmen**space force 



change of responsibility 



Gen. John “Jay” Raymond 



Gen B. Chance Saltzman 



Chief of Space Operations 



SecAF 



Aircrew Voluntary Acceptance of Risk 



AVAR 



pregnancy 



Air Force Medical Service 



Under Secretary of the Air Force 



AFRL 



Movement Matters study 



injury 



prevention 



physical fitness 



readiness
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM THE TRANS ENERGY, INC. FINANCIAL
               STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
               AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
               SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>   1

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                    0
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       125,705
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    133,450
<PP&E>                                            6,293,374
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,641,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5,009,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4,757,220
<BONDS>                                             525,427
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            160,580
<OTHER-SE>                                       20,818,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5,009,723
<SALES>                                             890,185
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    890,185
<CGS>                                               571,746
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2,089,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  275,447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,468,851)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,468,851)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,468,851)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.03)


</TABLE>
ACCEPTED 04-15-00555-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 11/19/2015 9:24:05 AM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice announces approval by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) of an expansion in service area for                               ( print page 57977)                            the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs of Oregon, Warm Springs, Oregon (Warm Springs Tribe) for financial assistance and social service programs.                    

# DATES:

The BIA approval was effective on July 7, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Linda K. Ketcher, Supervisory Social Worker, at (202) 513-7610.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Warm Springs Tribe submitted to BIA a request with supporting documentation to modify its service area under 25 CFR 20.201. The Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs has approved the request based on an evaluation of the information provided. This modification will expand the service area for the Warm Springs Tribe to include Hood River County (Oregon). The Tribe will provide services for eligible Indian clients in the new service area by setting up bi-weekly office hours at Hood River County.

Dated: August 26, 2010.

Larry Echo Hawk,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2010-23873 Filed 9-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-4J-P
759 A.2d 911

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Beyah WHITE, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 7, 2000.

*235
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 7th day of September, 2000, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted. The order of the Superior Court is reversed. See *Commonwealth v. Wimbush,*561 Pa. 368, 750 A.2d 807 (2000); *Commonwealth v. Goodwin,*561 Pa. 346, 750 A.2d 795 (2000).

Justice CASTILLE dissents.
Department of the United States Air Force LogoBiography
                  United States Air ForceGregory Martin CAPSTONE
            GREGORY S. MARTINGeneral Gregory S. Martin, USAF, Ret., is a senior fellow for the National Defense University in support of the Pinnacle, Capstone and Keystone programs.

General Martin retired from the United States Air Force in 2005 after thirty-five years of active commissioned service. His final duty was as the Commander of the Air Force Materiel Command where he commanded nearly 80,000 personnel  charged with the responsibility for the Air Force Science and Technology, Acquisition Support, Test and Evaluation and Weapons Systems Sustainment and Logistics missions. During his tenure, General Martin initiated the most significant organizational and process transformation in the history of the Air Force Materiel Command. Centered around the “Lean Engineering Model,” AFMC achieved unprecedented on-time maintenance and logistics performance improvements while concurrently reducing costs to the operational commands by 20 percent.

Previously, he was the Commander of the United States Air Forces Europe, Air Component Commander U.S. European Command and the Commander for NATO’s Allied Air Forces North. In those capacities, he commanded the United States, alliance and coalition air forces during operations Northern Watch, Joint Forge, Joint Guardian and Atlas Response. Additionally, he commanded the joint and allied air forces in the European theater of operations as they conducted long range combat employment missions, humanitarian relief, special operations sustainment and the largest post-WW II combat airdrops as a part of operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom.

A career fighter pilot with more than 4,600 flying hours, mostly in the F-4 and the F-15, General Martin flew as a combat ready pilot, flight leader, instructor pilot, operations officer and squadron commander in assignments throughout the world which include a combat tour in Southeast Asia where he flew 161 combat missions. He also commanded three fighter wings: The 479thTactical Training Wing and the 33rd and 1st Fighter Wings.

General Martin has experienced a rich variety of staff assignments that included operations and training, programming and budgeting, joint operations and force planning, joint and Air Force operational requirements and Air Force Acquisition. His senior level positions included being the Vice Director, and acting Director, of the Joint Staff’s J-8 Directorate, Director of Air Force Operational Requirements and Principal Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition.

Since retiring, General Martin has been a senior mentor with the Joint Forces Command. He has served on two Defense Science Board Studies, has served as the Chairman of the National Academies Air Force Studies Board, and the MITRE Air Force Advisory Board. He is also a consultant to many defense sector firms.

Retired from the Air Force in 2005,General Gregory S. Martin’s active duty biographyis available on the Air Force website.Department of the Air Force Logo
#### SANDVIK, INC. v. STATEWIDE SECURITY SYSTEMS.

February 28, 1984.

Cross-petition for certification denied. (See 192 *N.J.Super. 272)*
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Quintiles Transnational Corp. and Subsidiaries
Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quintiles Transnational Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis
B. Gillings, Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Dennis B. GillingsDennis B. GillingsExecutive Chairman andChief Executive OfficerApril 30, 2004Date
 This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of
any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.