Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 180 / Friday, September 17, 2010 / Notices 57079 

2004 

(percent) 

2005 

(percent) 

Canadian Claimants ............... 1.9 1.9 

Devotional 

Claimants ...... 3.4 3.4 

PTV ................... 7.4 7.1 

JSC ................... 32.3 35.4 

CTV ................... 17.9 14.2 

Program Suppliers .............. 33.1 34.4 

Similarly, adjusting downward to 

account for the Music Claimants’ share, 

the respective shares of the 3.75% Fund 

determined by the Judges are as follows: 

2004 

(percent) 

2005 

(percent) 

Music Claimants 4.0 3.6 

Canadian Claimants ............... 1.4 1.2 

Devotional 

Claimants ...... 3.7 3.7 

JSC ................... 35.3 38.6 

CTV ................... 19.5 15.4 

Program Suppliers .............. 36.1 37.5 

We agree with the Settling Parties that 

because only Music Claimants and 

Program Suppliers participate in the 

Syndex Fund and for the reasons 

provided supra at Section VI 

(Conclusion and Award), Music 

Claimants should receive 4.0% of the 

Syndex Fund for 2004 and 3.6% of the 

Syndex Fund for 2005. As a result, the 

respective shares of the Syndex Fund 

determined by the Judges are as follows: 

2004 

(percent) 

2005 

(percent) 

Music Claimants 4.0 3.6 

Program Suppliers .............. 96.0 96.4 

VIII. Order of the Copyright Royalty 

Judges 

Having fully considered the record 

and for the reasons set forth herein, the 

Copyright Royalty Judges order that the 

2004 and 2005 cable royalties shall be 

distributed according to the following 

percentages: 

2004 DISTRIBUTION

Claimant group Basic fund 

(percent) 

3.75% fund 

(percent) 

Syndex fund 

(percent) 

Music Claimants .................................................................................................................................... 4.0 4.0 4.0 

Canadian Claimants .............................................................................................................................. 1.9 1.4 0 

Devotional Claimants ............................................................................................................................. 3.4 3.7 0 

PTV ........................................................................................................................................................ 7.4 0 0 

JSC ........................................................................................................................................................ 32.3 35.3 0 

CTV ........................................................................................................................................................ 17.9 19.5 0 

Program Suppliers ................................................................................................................................. 33.1 36.1 96.0 

2005 DISTRIBUTION

Claimant group Basic fund 

(percent) 

3.75% fund 

(percent) 

Syndex fund 

(percent) 

Music Claimants .................................................................................................................................... 3.6 3.6 3.6 

Canadian Claimants .............................................................................................................................. 1.9 1.2 0 

Devotional Claimants ............................................................................................................................. 3.4 3.7 0 

PTV ........................................................................................................................................................ 7.1 0 0 

JSC ........................................................................................................................................................ 35.4 38.6 0 

CTV ........................................................................................................................................................ 14.2 15.4 0 

Program Suppliers ................................................................................................................................. 34.4 37.5 96.4 

So ordered. 

Dated: July 21, 2010. 

James Scott Sledge, 

Chief Copyright Royalty Judge. 

William J. Roberts, Jr., 

Copyright Royalty Judge. 

Stanley C. Wisniewski, 

Copyright Royalty Judge. 

Dated: July 21, 2010. 

James Scott Sledge, 

Chief, U.S. Copyright Royalty Judge. 

Approved by: 

James H. Billington, 

Librarian of Congress. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23266 Filed 9–16–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1410–72–P 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

[Notice: (10–110)] 

NASA Advisory Council; Information 

Technology Infrastructure Committee; 

Meeting 

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration. 

ACTION: Notice of meeting. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 

Law 92–463, as amended, the National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration 

(NASA) announces a meeting for the 

Information Technology Infrastructure 

Committee of the NASA Advisory 

Council (NAC). 

DATES: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 8 

a.m.–5:30 p.m., Local Time. Meet-MeNumber: 1–877–613–3958; #2939943. 

ADDRESSES: NASA Ames Conference 

Center, 500 Severyns Avenue, Building 

3, Ballroom, NASA Research Park, 

Moffett Field, CA 94035–1000. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Tereda J. Frazier, Executive Secretary 

for the Information Technology 

Infrastructure Committee, National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration 

Headquarters, Washington DC 20546, 

(202) 358–2595. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The topics 

of discussion for the meeting are the 

following: 

• NASA IT Summit Post Mortem 

Briefing. 

• NASA’s Chief Technology Officer 

Briefing. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
57080 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 180 / Friday, September 17, 2010 / Notices 

• Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s Chief 

Technology Officer Briefing. 

• IT Committee Work Plan Actions/ 

Assignments. 

• Logistics. 

The meeting will be open to the 

public up to the seating capacity of the 

room. It is imperative that this meeting 

be held on this date to accommodate the 

scheduling priorities of the key 

participants. Visitors will need to show 

a valid picture identification such as a 

driver’s license to enter the NASA Ames 

Conference Center and must state that 

they are attending the NASA Advisory 

Council Information Technology 

Infrastructure Committee meeting in the 

Ballroom. All non-U.S. citizens must fax 

a copy of their passport, and print or 

type their name, current address, 

citizenship, company affiliation (if 

applicable) to include address, 

telephone number, and their title, place 

of birth, date of birth, U.S. visa 

information to include type, number 

and expiration date, U.S. Social Security 

Number (if applicable), and place and 

date of entry into the U.S., to Ms. Tereda 

J. Frazier, Executive Secretary, 

Information Technology Infrastructure 

Committee, NASA Advisory Council, at 

e-mail tereda.j.frazier@nasa.gov or by 

telephone at (202) 358–2595 by no later 

than September 20, 2010. To expedite 

admittance, attendees with U.S. 

citizenship can provide identifying 

information 3 working days in advance 

by contacting Ms. Tereda J. Frazier via 

e-mail at tereda.j.frazier@nasa.gov or by 

telephone at 202–358–2595. Persons 

with disabilities who require assistance 

should indicate this. 

September 13, 2010. 

P. Diane Rausch, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, 

National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23237 Filed 9–16–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[NRC–2010–0178; Docket No. 50–228; 

License No. R–98] 

In the Matter of Aerotest Operations, 

Inc. (Aerotest Radiography and 

Research Reactor); Order Extending 

the Effectiveness of the Approval of 

the Indirect Transfer of Facility 

Operating License 

I 

Aerotest Operations, Inc., (Aerotest, 

the licensee) is the holder of Facility 

Operating License No. R–98 which 

authorizes the possession, use, and 

operation of the Aerotest Radiography 

and Research Reactor (ARRR) located in 

San Ramon, California, under the 

provisions of Title 10 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 

50.21(c) for research and development 

purposes. Aerotest is a wholly owned 

subsidiary of OEA Aerospace, Inc., 

which is wholly owned by OEA, Inc. 

OEA, Inc., is a wholly owned subsidiary 

of Autoliv ASP, Inc., (Autoliv), which is 

owned by Autoliv, Inc. 

II 

The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission’s (NRC) Order dated July 6, 

2010, consented to the indirect transfer 

of control of the above facility from its 

current owner, Autoliv to X-Ray 

Industries, Inc. (X-Ray), (together, the 

applicants), pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80. 

By its terms, the Order of July 6, 2010, 

would become null and void if the 

license transfer was not completed by 

September 13, 2010, unless upon 

application and for good cause shown, 

such date was extended by the 

Commission. 

III 

By letter dated September 3, 2010, 

Aerotest submitted a request for an 

extension of the effectiveness of the 

Order of July 6, 2010, such that the 

Order would remain effective through 

September 28, 2010. According to the 

submittal, ‘‘Aerotest, along with the 

Buyer and Seller (the ‘‘Parties’’) have 

diligently pursued necessary agreements 

from the U.S. Department of Energy 

(‘‘DOE’’) and U.S. Department of Defense 

(‘‘DoD’’) with regard to used nuclear fuel 

at the ARRR. However, such agreements 

have proved difficult to secure for 

reasons beyond the control of Aerotest 

and the other Parties. 

Aerotest expects to be able to inform 

the NRC by September 17, 2010, of the 

date by which an agreement with the 

DOE and DoD on used nuclear fuel will 

be able to be completed. At that time, 

Aerotest expects to be able to identify a 

date by which all U. S. Government 

agreements will be in hand so that the 

transfer may be consummated. 

Therefore, Aerotest requests an 

extension until seven (7) business days 

after September 17, 2010 or until 

September 28, 2010. An extension of the 

Transfer Order until September 28, 2010 

is expected to give Aerotest adequate 

time to identify how long an extension 

is needed to complete agreements on 

used nuclear fuel with DOE and DoD.’’ 

The applicant stated in its September 

3, 2010, extension request that the 

transaction will not be completed by 

September 13, 2010. 

The NRC staff has considered the 

submittal of September 3, 2010, request 

for extension, and has determined that 

good cause to extend the effectiveness of 

the Order of July 6, 2010, has been 

shown in that the delay in completing 

the transaction was not caused by the 

licensee. 

IV 

Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 

161b, 161i, 161o, and 184 of the Atomic 

Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the 

Act), 42 U.S.C.2201(b), 2201(i), 2201(o), 

and 2234; and 10 CFR 50.80, it is hereby 

ordered that the effectiveness of the 

Order of July 6, 2010, described herein 

be extended until October 15, 2010, 

subject to the conditions set forth in the 

July 6, 2010, Order, and subject to the 

following additional conditions: 

A. No later than September 28, 2010, a 

description of the agreements the parties 

anticipate reaching with the U.S. Department 

of Energy and the U.S. Department of Defense 

regarding the ultimate fuel disposition shall 

be submitted in writing to the NRC Director, 

Division of Policy and Rulemaking. The 

September 28 submission shall also provide 

an estimated date for completion of the 

transfer. 

B. The parties shall provide a written 

report to the NRC Director, Division of Policy 

and Rulemaking, on a weekly basis, progress 

made toward completion of the transfer. 

It is further ordered that if the 

proposed transfer is not consummated 

by October 15, 2010, the Order of July 

6, 2010, shall become null and void, 

unless upon application, on or before 

September 28, 2010, and for good cause 

shown, such date is further extended by 

Order. 

This Order is effective upon issuance. 

For further details with respect to this 

Order, see the submittal dated 

September 3, 2010, (Agencywide 

Documents Access and Management 

System (ADAMS) Accession No. 

ML102510500), which is available for 

public inspection at the Commission’s 

Public Document Room (PDR), located 

at One White Flint North, Public File 

Area 01 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first 

floor), Rockville, Maryland, and 

accessible electronically from the 

ADAMS Public Electronic Reading 

Room on the Internet at the NRC Web 

site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ 

adams.html. Persons who do not have 

access to ADAMS or who encounter 

problems in accessing the documents 

located in ADAMS, should contact the 

NRC PDR reference staff by telephone at 

1–800–397–4209, or 301–415–4737, or 

by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1