alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 45th Space Wing supports 6th SpaceX re-supply missionPublished April 15, 2015
                        
                        By 45th Space Wing Public Affairs Office
                **CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                The 45th Space Wing supported Space Exploration Technologies' (SpaceX) successful launch of their Falcon 9 Dragon spacecraft headed to the International Space Station from Space Launch Complex 40, here April 14.
The mission is SpaceX's fourth Falcon 9 launch of the year, and the company's sixth operational re-supply mission to the space station.
A combined team of military, government civilians and contractors from across the 45th SW provided support to the mission, including weather forecasts, launch and range operations, security, safety and public affairs.  
The Dragon spacecraft is filled with more than 4,300 pounds of supplies and payloads, including critical materials to directly support about 40 of the more than 250 science and research investigations that will occur during Expeditions 43 and 44, according to NASA.
Science payloads will study new ways to possibly counteract the microgravity-induced cell damage seen during spaceflight, the effects of microgravity on the most common cells in bones, gather new insight that could lead to treatments for osteoporosis and muscle wasting conditions. Studies will also include continued research into astronaut vision changes and test a new material that could one day be used as a synthetic muscle for robotics explorers of the future.
After five weeks at the space station, the spacecraft will return to Earth with more than 3,000 pounds of cargo, including crew supplies, hardware and computer resources, science experiments, and space station hardware. The spacecraft will splash down in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of Baja, California.
Brig. Gen. Nina Armagno, the 45th SW commander, who also served as the launch decision authority for this mission, lauded the entire team effort.
"One mission at a time -- totally focused on our disciplined and safe process execution to ensure 100 percent mission success -- is how we do things here on the Eastern Range," Armagno said. "As always, all the credit goes to Team Patrick-Cape, NASA, SpaceX, and all the other mission partners who came together to make this mission happen. You continue to impress me and to do yourself proud."
The next launch on the Eastern Range Manifest is the Falcon 9 Thales mission, currently slated for liftoff April 24, from Space Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station.AFSPC 



SpaceX 



launch 



NASA 



International Space Station 



spacecraft 



Patrick AFB 



cape canaveral air force station
762 A.2d 1082

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner, v. Robert HUNTER, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Nov. 17, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. The June 23, 2000, order of the Superior Court denying the Petition for Review of the trial court’s denial of bail is VACATED, and the bail matter is REMANDED to the trial court for reconsideration in light of the denial of the Commonwealth’s Petition for Allowance of Appeal.
#### Robert J. WATERS and Suzanne J. Waters, Appellants, v. Christopher D. BEECHLER, Suzanne M. Beechler and Beechler-Waters, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 1D10-0572.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 17, 2010.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 22, 2010.

Leonard E. Ireland, Jr. of Clayton-Johnston, P.A., Gainesville, for Appellants.

Kris B. Robinson of Robinson, Kennon & Kendron, P.A., Lake City, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Robert J. Waters and Suzanne J. Waters appeal an order granting a new trial following a jury trial in which the jury returned a verdict finding that Christopher Beechler, Suzanne M. Beechler, and Beechler-Waters, Inc., appellees, had *37breached a stock purchase agreement entered into among the parties in 2004; that the Waters had not breached a subsequent stock purchase agreement entered into among the parties in 2006; and that the Waters had breached their fiduciary duty as directors of Beechler-Waters, Inc. The jury awarded damages to Waters in the amount of $751,099 and to the Beechlers in the amount of $38,235.46. As we read the order under review, in essence, the trial court determined that the jury’s verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. This court reviews the trial court’s order using an abuse of discretion standard of review. *Brown v. Estate of Stuckey,*749 So.2d 490 (Fla.1999). In *Brown,*the Supreme Court explained the trial court’s discretionary authority to grant a new trial in this circumstance:

> The trial judge’s discretionary power to grant a new trial on the grounds that the verdict is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence is the only check against a jury that has reached an unjust decision on the facts. This discretionary power emanates from the common law principle that it is the duty of the trial judge to prevent what he or she considers to be a miscarriage of justice. The role of the trial judge is not to substitute his or her own verdict for that of the jury, but to avoid what, in the judge’s trained and experienced judgment, is an unjust verdict.

*Brown,*749 So.2d at 495 (citations omitted). *Brown*also describes our standard of review, as follows:

> When reviewing the order granting a new trial, an appellate court must recognize the broad discretionary authority of the trial judge and apply the reasonableness test to determine whether the trial judge committed an abuse of discretion. If an appellate court determines that reasonable persons could differ as to the propriety of the action taken by the trial court, there can be no finding of an abuse of discretion. The fact that there may be substantial, competent evidence in the record to support the jury verdict does not necessarily demonstrate that the trial judge abused his or her discretion.

*Brown,*749 So.2d at 497-98. Under the facts here, we find no abuse of discretion in granting the motion for new trial.

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
#### ROBERT TUSCHAK AND HERBERT SMILOWITZ v. MAYOR & TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HILLSBOROUGH.

March 13, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
**Exhibit 21.01**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF KEYNOTE SYSTEMS, INC.**

 

Velogic, Inc., a California corporation 

 

Big Red Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation 

 

Envision Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation

 

Keynote Europe SAS, a corporation organizedunder the laws of the Republic of France 

 

OnDevice Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation 

 

NetMechanic, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

 

Keynote Canada, a corporation organized under the laws of Canada 

 

NetRaker Corporation 

 

Hudson Williams, Inc. 

 

Vividence Corporation
News United States Air Force
 Kadena, Marine units integrate for large-force exercisePublished July 2, 2015
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Zackary A. Henry
                        
                        
                        18th Wing Public Affairs
                **KADENA AIR BASE, Japan (AFNS) --**
                Flying squadrons from Kadena Air Base were a part of a joint service exercise here, with units from the Marine Corps to practice air-to-air superiority while protecting ground troops June 30.
Kadena AB’s 44th and 67th Fighter Squadrons practiced joint air operations with F/A-18 Hornets from the Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (All Weather) 225 and several F-16 Fighting Falcons from Vermont Air National Guard's 158th Fighter Wing, while protecting Marine and Air Force helicopters and Marine ground troops.
"Working with the Marines provided an opportunity to see how to integrate the air piece with something on the ground," said Capt. Nathan Franklin, a 33rd Rescue Squadron pilot. "This is the first LFE I've been in that actually had a ground piece incorporated into an exercise. It was an interesting thing to see."
An important piece of the exercise was to practice air-to-air capabilities of deterrence while protecting ground troops and the rescue helicopters, all at the same time.
With the fighters halting any air offensive and preventing any further attack from overhead, it allowed the ground troops and the rescue helicopters to complete their mission without any fear of reprisal from the air, Franklin said.
"This exercise validated the tactic used," Franklin continued. "As long as we have rescue combat air patrol along with the fighters in the air, the enemy just doesn't have time to worry about what we are doing below, which means we can push forward and support them better."
It takes that cooperation between fighters, both Air Force and Marine, and helicopters to work together in order to make the mission as successful as possible.
"The Marines often work by helicopter insertion in order to take advantage of the element of surprise as well as improved mobility," said Marine Corps Capt. Chester Watts, the VMFA(AW)-225 schedules officer. "However, some threats both air-to-air, and surface-to-air make that too risky, which is why we have fighters responsible for eliminating those threats."
It's that flawless integration of both aircraft and U.S. services that provides for the common defense of Japan and the Indo-Asia-Pacific region.PACAF 



training 



Marines 



F-16 Fighting Falcon 



f-16 



Kadena AB
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 58387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23928]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 21, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Cendera Holdings, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of First 
Bells Bankshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of 
The First National Bank of Bells/Savoy, both of Bells, Texas.
    In connection with this application, Applicant also has applied to 
acquire Cendera Funding, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas, and thereby engage in 
extending credit and servicing loans, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) 
of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 21, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-23928 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
News United States Air Force
 Flat Stanleys deploy from McConnellPublished Aug. 4, 2016
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Jenna K. Caldwell
                        
                        
                        22nd Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs
                **MCCONNELL AIR FORCE BASE, Kan. (AFNS) --**
                It was early in the morning when they got the call to deploy. Once aboard a KC-135 Stratotanker, they began their 8,000-mile expedition. It was 110 degrees when they landed in the hot and dusty country, and their journey had only just begun, the aircrew said.The paper dolls, also known as Flat Stanleys, were crafted by a class of second-graders from Columbus Elementary School in McMinnville, Oregon, and sent out to deploy with KC-135 crews from the 384th, 350th and 349th Air Refueling Squadrons.“My students were fascinated with their ‘missions,’” said Leah Spencer, teacher of the class. “Many students had very little background information about the Air Force or the military, so it provided many opportunities for new learning.”The project is a pen pal activity to increase literacy among young children. The students each talked and wrote about their flat character’s journey and adventures, while receiving information and photos back from the crew.“They were wonderful about sending journal updates often, which kept (the class) engaged and eager for the next bit of news,” Spencer said. “The pictures that we received were probably the most exciting part for the children. We learned about so many things that we never would have if they hadn't taken our flat friends on their journey.”The Flat Stanleys traveled halfway around the world with the aircrew, participating in nighttime refueling missions over Southeast Asia.“It was fun to fly the Stanleys around,” said 1st Lt. Alexander Rindo, a 350th ARS pilot. “It gave the crewmembers something else to look forward to while doing our mission and gave us a morale boost knowing it was for the kids back home.”When McConnell Airmen were approached about this project through a parent, they were more than happy to help. The crew was deployed for more than a month overseas and the Flat Stanleys were alongside them every step of the way.“It’s always great to help out the community in any way we can,” Rindo said. “We love being involved when we get the chance, especially if it means making someone’s day. We couldn’t pass up the opportunity to help out a classroom of second-graders who worked hard on creating their flat people.”After the deployment, the dolls returned back home to Oregon, where the children patiently awaited their arrival.“The kids were so excited they could hardly contain themselves,” Spencer said. “(The children) really saw the flat people as extensions of themselves, so it was so important for them to have them back from their adventure and a great way to end the school year.”community 



KC-135 



deployment 



AF family 



McConnell AFB 



AMC 



school
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1285 

To provide for the conveyance of a parcel of National Forest System land 

in Kittitas County, Washington, to facilitate the construction of a new 

fire and rescue station, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2007 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington (for himself and Mr. REICHERT) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the conveyance of a parcel of National Forest 

System land in Kittitas County, Washington, to facilitate 

the construction of a new fire and rescue station, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Snoqualmie Pass Land 

5 Conveyance Act’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1285 IH

1 SEC. 2. LAND CONVEYANCE, NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM 

2 LAND, KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 

3 (a) CONVEYANCE REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Ag4 riculture shall convey, without consideration, to the King 

5 and Kittitas Counties Fire District #51 of King and 

6 Kittitas Counties, Washington (in this section referred to 

7 as the ‘‘District’’), all right, title, and interest of the 

8 United States in and to a parcel of National Forest Sys9 tem land in Kittitas County, Washington, consisting of approximately three acres within the NW1⁄4,SW1⁄4,SE1 10 ⁄4 of 

11 section 4, township 22 north, range 11 east, Willamette 

12 meridian, for the purpose of permitting the District to use 

13 the parcel as a site for a new Snoqualmie Pass fire and 

14 rescue station. 

15 (b) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—If the Secretary de16 termines at any time that the real property conveyed 

17 under subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with 

18 the purpose of the conveyance specified in such subsection, 

19 all right, title, and interest in and to the property shall 

20 revert, at the option of the Secretary, to the United States, 

21 and the United States shall have the right of immediate 

22 entry onto the property. Any determination of the Sec23 retary under this subsection shall be made on the record 

24 after an opportunity for a hearing. 

25 (c) SURVEY.—If necessary, the exact acreage and 

26 legal description of the lands to be conveyed under subVerDate Aug 31 2005 17:45 Mar 03, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1285.IH H1285

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1285 IH

1 section (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory 

2 to the Secretary. The cost of a survey shall be borne by 

3 the District. 

4 (d) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The 

5 Secretary may require such additional terms and condi6 tions in connection with the conveyance under subsection 

7 (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the 

8 interests of the United States. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### STATE ex rel. Clyde LYNCH v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-0157.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re Lynch, Clyde; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 3-92-291; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 KW 1905.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189; *State v. Parker,*98-0256 (La.5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.
News United States Air Force
 Parachute riggers: One ripcord at a timePublished April 2, 2015
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Carlin Leslie
                        
                        
                        Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa Public Affairs
                **CAMP LEMONNIER, Djibouti (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force uses more than 20 types of parachutes to conduct personnel recovery, airdrops and asset insertion into combat zones. Knowing what type of parachute is required for each mission and verifying the safety of those parachutes is the job of a parachute rigger.
This responsibility on Camp Lemonnier is up to the 82nd Expeditionary Rescue Squadron Aircrew Flight Equipment riggers, deployed from Moffett Federal Airfield, California.
“Being a rigger, everything we do has to be 100 percent,” said Tech. Sgt. Isaac Corniel, the 82nd ERQS AFE NCO in charge. “There is no room for mistakes. There’s no room for error. Their lives are in our hands. Even if we have a small twist in a line we want to make it straight, as it can mean someone’s life.”
Being deployed to Djibouti has allowed the 82nd ERQS AFE to train on real-world missions unlike any other training they can get at home station.
AFE riggers are required to pack a variety of chutes in a variety of conditions throughout the world to meet mission needs. The packing can take from 35 minutes to several hours to inspect and repack. Along with the complex quality control measures that must be performed. 
“We just try to be the best that we can. We preach quality, quantity and efficiency,” Corniel said. “We are combined with a variety of military forces being deployed, so our guys get to train on more scenarios than they would at home.”
According to Corniel, being deployed to Africa has allowed the team to have hands-on experience with more airdrop missions, whereas back home they would only provide chutes for one or two drops a month. The AFE Airmen said they have grown their understanding on the job to make their deployment a success.
“The guys have been great. They all live up to the riggers creed; they know now what it is to be a rigger,” Corniel said. “We are a part of something special and we strive to keep the history of excellence between the pararescue teams and riggers.”Djibouti 



Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa 



CJTF-HOA 



parachute 



82nd Expeditionary Rescue Squadron 



Camp Lemonnier
#### Frank Rolerad v. J. H. Holt.

(No. 2391.)

January *7,*1888.

Appeal from Washington County.

Ben. S. Rogers, counsel for appellant.

Garrett, Searcy & Bryan, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Will-son, J.

§ 353. *Statute of frauds; loan, etc., of chattels within, when; case stated.*Appellee owned a mare which he placed in possession of one Brown under a verbal contract that Brown should breed the mare to a jack, and the colts she might produce were to be the property of appellee. Brown was to keep and use the mare. After Brown had kept possession of said mare for more than two years under said contract she and one of the colts she had produced during said time were levied upon under execution as said Brown’s property, and were sold under said execution and levy, and appellant purchased the said mare and colt at said sale. Appellee sued appellant to recover the value of said mare and colt, and recovered judgment for *$75*and costs. *Held:*Under the provisions .of article 2468 of the Revised Statutes, the absolute property in said mare and colt, as to creditors of and purchasers from said Brown, had vested in him at the date of said levy, and appellant acquired a valid title to said property by his purchase at said execution sale.

Reversed and remanded.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Renal Care Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
M. Dill, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

/s/ David M. Dill
------------------------------
David M. Dill
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
May 10, 2004