alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,988,483                       0
<SECURITIES>                                   700,441                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,255,314                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    126,762                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,689,036                       0
<PP&E>                                       6,190,883                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,732,043                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,772,137                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       137,447                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,859,571                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,732,043                       0
<SALES>                                      3,271,245               8,432,817
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                          558,691               4,261,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,921,420              23,261,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (30,433)               (311,226)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,178,433)            (18,778,837)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,178,433)            (18,778,837)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.38)                  (1.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### Garrett & Key v. City of Marshall.

(No. 1196, Op. Book No. 3, p. 156.)

Error from Harrison County.

November 26, 1881.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 565. *Draft upon particular fund; allegations necessary in suit upon, against drawee.*Appellants sued appelleé upon drafts drawn against it upon the school fund of the city. It was not alleged in the petition that appellee had any such fund on hand, or that an election had been held by which the city was authorized to levy a tax to raise such a fund, as provided by statute. [Rev. Stats. 3785 et seq.] A demurrer was sustained to the petition, and, appellants declining to amend,their suit was dismissed. *Held,*the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition. The averments of the petition did not set out a cause of action against appellee, in that it did not show that there were any funds in its hands subject to the draft, etc. [1 Dillon on Munic. Oorp. § 505.]

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Petro
Financial Corporation (the Company), that to his knowledge:



(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This written statement is being furnished to the SEC as an
exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 4, 2004 |  | /s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.               
|                       |  | (J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)                 
|                       |  | President and Director               
|                       | 
|Date: November 4, 2004 |  | /s/ Edward Escudero                  
|                       |  | (Edward Escudero)                    
|                       |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Quintiles Transnational Corp. and Subsidiaries
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Quintiles Transnational
Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986.](c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit




---



##### 



committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Dennis B. GillingsDennis B. Gillings, Ph.D.Executive Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Cardium Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 of Cardium
Therapeutics, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Cardium Therapeutics, Inc.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Christopher J. Reinhard                     
|                      |  |  |  | Christopher J. Reinhard, Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Dennis M. Mulroy                            
|                      |  |  |  | Dennis M. Mulroy, Chief Financial Officer       

The foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 10, 2014.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D13-2877

Lower Tribunal No. 09-61914

________________

The Quin Group, Inc., etc.,

Appellant,

vs.

2020 Ponce, LLC, etc.

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Arzola,

Judge.

Beck & Lee Trial Lawyers and Elizabeth Lee Beck and Jared H. Beck, for

appellant.

Phillips, Cantor, Shalek, Rubin & Pfister and Gary S. Phillips and Edward J.

Pfister (Hollywood); Blaik P. Ross, for appellee.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.

SALTER, J.
In this circuit court case involving a contract for the purchase of an office

condominium unit from a developer (2020 Ponce), the purchaser (The Quin

Group) subpoenaed the general contractor (Beauchamp Construction Co., a nonparty) to produce various records. The contractor filed objections that included a

request for the reimbursement of the contractor’s general counsel at $150 an hour

to remove or identify privileged documents in the estimated 35 boxes of

construction documents.

The trial court instead authorized “costs” at $40 per hour for an “employee”

of Beauchamp to “use good faith in reviewing documents and limiting time needed

to review said documents.” Part of the handwritten order (and it is unclear who

may have done the writing) stated “The purpose of reviewing the documents is to

review for privilege issues prior to production.” Based on the inclusion of that

sentence in the order, The Quin Group maintains that any award to Beauchamp for

such a review would be an award of attorney’s fees, not costs, prohibited under the

applicable rules and such cases as Attorney’s Title Insurance Fund, Inc. v. LandaPosada, 984 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Neither the order for reimbursement of costs for the review and production

of documents nor a subsequent order denying The Quin Group’s motion for

reconsideration and rehearing fixed an amount to be awarded. At oral argument,

2
counsel for The Quin Group argued that the parties had estimated that the task

might take ten hours, so that the amount in controversy was essentially agreed.

Although we are tempted to “secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive

determination,”1 of this $400.00 dispute in a prompt and decisive fashion, our

limited jurisdiction precludes us from doing so. The orders before us are not final

because the amount of any award of costs has not been determined. See Kling

Corp. v. Hola Networks Corp., 127 So. 3d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Nor do we

find any other basis for jurisdiction.

Because this record reflects that the Beauchamp employee performing the

document review and production is a non-lawyer, it seems unlikely that the final

invoice for costs remitted to The Quin Group by Beauchamp will include

attorney’s fees. But if the invoice does include such time or charges, The Quin

Group will have an opportunity to raise its objections and to appeal from any

resulting final order.

Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

1

 Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.010.

3
exv4w7



 




[JOHNSON CATO & ASOCIADOS LETTERHEAD]




Caracas, January 6, 2004.




Minister of Finance

Ministry of Finance

Avenida Urdaneta,

Esquina de Carmelitas,

Edificio Sede del Ministerio de Finanzas,

Oficina Nacional de Crédito Público, Piso 9,

Caracas, Venezuela



	 	 	 
	Re:
	 	The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

Post Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement
No.333-9186







Dear Sir:




     We have acted as special Venezuelan counsel to the Bolivarian Republic of
Venezuela (the “Republic” or “Venezuela”) in connection with the
above-referenced Registration Statement, as amended (the “Registration
Statement”) including the Prospectus and the Prospectus Supplement, each of
which constitutes a part thereof, and the forms of the Underwriting Agreement
and the Fiscal Agency Agreement, as amended, filed as exhibits 4(1), 4(2) and
4(3), respectively, thereto (the “Agreements”), pursuant to which Venezuela
proposes to issue and sell certain debt securities (the “Global Bonds”).



     The issuance of the Global Bonds has been authorized by the National
Executive of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela pursuant to the Organic
Financial Administration Public Sector Law, the Special Annual Indebtedness Law
for Fiscal Year 2004, the approval of the Permanent Finance Committee of
Venezuelan National Assembly N° 1429 dated December 3, 2003 and the approval of
the Vice-President of the Republic in consultation with the Council of
Ministers N° 314 dated December 9, 2003, and the non-binding opinion of the
Central Bank under number GOI-DPI-DA-347, dated November 27, 2003.



     It is our opinion that when the Global Bonds have been duly authorized,
executed and delivered by Venezuela and authenticated pursuant to the
Agreements, the Global Bonds will constitute valid and legally binding
obligations of Venezuela under and with respect to the present laws of
Venezuela.



 






 


Minister of Finance

January 6, 2004

Page 2



     We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to use our name under the heading “Validity of the
Global Bonds” in the Registration Statement. In given the foregoing consent,
we don not thereby admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent
is required under Section 7 of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder.



Very truly yours,




	 	 	 
	/s/ Carlos Eduardo Cato C.	 	/s/ John M. Johnson Fischel
	 	 	 
	CARLOS EDUARDO CATO C.

Partner	 	JOHN M. JOHNSON FISCHEL

Partner
ACQUISITION OF THE 49% RIGHTS TO NET PROFITS AGREEMENT

                 This Acquisition of the 49% rights to net profits Agreement
        (the Agreement) is made and entered into this 27th day of February, 2000
        by and between Prof. Oleg Figovsky with offices located 3A Shimkin
        Street #l Haifa Israel 34750 (referred to herein as the ("Inventor") and
        EUROTECH Ltd., a District of Columbia corporation with offices at 1216
        16th Street, NW Washington DC 20036 USA (`Company").


                 A. Inventor is the developer of certain technologies known as
        LEM, RubCon, HNIPU, Electronic Glues and anticorrosive additives (the
        `Technology"), rights to which were sold in their entirety by the
        Inventor to the Company in accordance to the agreements previously
        signed and executed in exchange to the royalty equal to 49% of the net
        revenues generated from sales of the said technologies as provided in
        the agreements attached hereto in Exhibit A.

                 B. The Inventor and the Company believe that an amendment to
        these agreements would better reflect the nature of the ongoing and the
        future relations between the Company and the Inventor and have agreed to
        amend the original agreements as provided in paragraph (C)of this
        Agreement.

                 C. The Inventor is willing to fully waive his rights to the 49%
        net profits as stipulated in the paragraph (2) "Consideration" and all
        relevant paragraphs of the original agreements attached hereto in
        exchange to a one time sum of $235,000 (two hundred and thirty five
        thousand) paid by the Company to the Inventor within 30 days of signing
        this contract and one percent (1%) royalty from the gross revenues
        generated by the sales of the Technology for the period of the 15 years.

                  D. All other provisions of the original contracts shall stay
         the same.


                                           Company    /s/ Don V. Hahnfeldt
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Don V. Hahnfeldt
                                                      Chief Executive Officer


                                                                     SEAL

                                           Inventor   /S/ Oleg Figovsky
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Oleg Figovsky

        EXHIBIT A

         THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENTS ON PURCHASE OF THE TECHNOLOGY.

                 The Terms and Conditions are described in the attached
Agreements.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1129 

To provide for the construction, operation, and maintenance of an arterial 

road in St. Louis County, Missouri. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. CARNAHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To provide for the construction, operation, and maintenance 

of an arterial road in St. Louis County, Missouri. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROJECT DEFINED. 

4 In this Act, the term ‘‘project’’ means only the por5 tion of St. Louis County, Missouri, arterial road 1151 that 

6 is deed-restricted property, which specifically applies to 

7 approximately 0.3 acres and 540 lineal feet and is identi8 fied as the ‘‘FEMA’’ route in the document entitled 

9 ‘‘Lemay Connector Road for Long-Term Recovery, Rec10 reational Enhancements, & Community, & Economic DeVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:32 Feb 22, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1129.IH H1129

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1129 IH

1 velopment’’, dated June 1, 2006, on file with the St. Louis 

2 County department of highways and traffic. 

3 SEC. 2. APPLICABLITY OF CERTAIN FEDERAL LAW. 

4 The St. Louis County arterial road 1151, known as 

5 the ‘‘Lemay Connector Road’’ in St. Louis City and Coun6 ty, Missouri, may be constructed, operated, and main7 tained over the deed-restricted property described in sec8 tion 1, notwithstanding section 404(b)(2) of the Robert 

9 T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 

10 (42 U.S.C. 5170c) or Public Law 103–211 and any ease11 ment or other similar restriction pursuant to those Fed12 eral laws on the development of property that requires the 

13 property be maintained for open space, recreation, or wet14 land management. 

15 SEC. 3. NO DETRIMENTAL EFFECT ON FLOOD PLAIN. 

16 For the project, St. Louis County, Missouri, shall en17 sure that the project is constructed, operated, and main18 tained in such a manner that would not cause any future 

19 additional flood damage that would not have occurred 

20 without the project. Prior to constructing the project, St. 

21 Louis County or its assignee must identify and agree to 

22 restrict a nearby parcel of land of equal or greater size 

23 to the deed restricted land used for the project so that 

24 such parcel is maintained for open space, recreation, or 

25 wetland management. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1129 IH

1 SEC. 4. LIABILITY FOR FLOOD DAMAGE. 

2 The Federal Government shall not be liable for future 

3 flood damage that is caused by the project. St. Louis 

4 County, Missouri, or its assignee shall be liable for any 

5 future flood damage that is caused by the project. 

6 SEC. 5. NO FUTURE DISASTER ASSISTANCE. 

7 The deed-restricted property described in section 1 

8 is not eligible for any future disaster assistance from any 

9 other Federal source. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS