alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Acquisitions enterprise:  Agility and people key to reformPublished April 24, 2015
                        
                        By Senior Airman Hailey Haux
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs Command Information
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Dr. William LaPlante, assistant secretary of Air Force acquisition, along with the Navy and Army acquisition secretaries testified on acquisition reform before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support, April 22.
LaPlante spoke about agility and adaptability being fundamental to the Air Force strategy.
“The emphasis is on fielding systems more rapidly and building resilient systems that are inherently resistant to predictive failure,” LaPlante said in his written testimony. “There are several techniques to help shorten development cycle times, allowing for increased performance beyond legacy systems with the rapidly fielded ‘A-model’ design of the system.
“We have to use the right tools and disciplines now to ensure we are developing and fielding the right systems that need to be there for us to win that future fight,” LaPlante said in a previous discussion on the topic.  “Knowing threats are going to change as we are working on these systems, we need to be able to pivot to affect the new threats that we can’t even see today that we know will be out there in the future.”
Another topic of concern was how the acquisition community is training and keeping experienced professionals.
In order to keep the correct experts in the acquisition community, LaPlante said they have to “appeal to the patriotism of this individual and their family.” 
“The Air Force deliberately develops military and civilian acquisition professionals according to well defined career path models which serve as a guide for professional experience opportunities, education and training,” LaPlante said in his written testimony. “These career models provide ample opportunity and experience for acquisition professionals at all ranks, and provide a defined path to greater rank and responsibility within the acquisition workforce.”
In answering the committee’s questions he discussed how the enterprise is learning from prior AQ mistakes with a recent change to produce an ‘Acquisition Incident Report’ when a program suffers serious challenges or cancellation.
“When there is an accident or crash, there is a safety investigation done,” LaPlante said. “We are doing the same thing when we have an acquisition crash. Lessons learned comes down to about six root causes and they are all very fundamental ... We took those lessons learned and went program by program to see if there were any of the same root causes and addressed them.”Air Force strategy 



Senate Armed Services Committee 



Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support 



acquisition
News United States Air Force
 Latest Airman magazine issue now availablePublished July 1, 2014
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                The July/August issue of Airman magazine is now available to download and viewable through a Web browser.
Our cover story, titled “The Perfect Edge” takes you into the forests of Washington state to learn how survival, evasion, resistance and escape students learn to survive in austere environments before they teach aircrew members to do the same.
Also in this issue is “Recruiting Las Vegas,” where a flight of recruiters is tasked to bring more people in the Air Force than any other in the service.
On the other side of the country, at MacDill Air Force Base, Fla., we show you how Airmen of the 6th Security Forces Squadron Marine Patrol keep the base’s 7.2 mile coastline secure: They don’t use typical squad cars, but high-powered boats.
You can download Airman magazine’s May/June issue for your tablet here:
• Apple version
• Android version
• Kindle version
Airman magazine provides an interactive experience for tablet readers and a limited interactive version is viewable in Web browser format. Click here to read this issue on your PC/Mac.
For more stories, visit Airman Online, the website for the official magazine of the United States Air Force.Airman 



photography 



multi-media 



Airman magazine
Stock Certificate



 EXHIBIT 4.1 
  



 
  









 Main Street Banks, Inc. 
  

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to
applicable laws or regulations: 
  

	 TEN COM–as tenants in common
	  	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT–                    Custodian         
           
	 	  	(Cust)                        (Minor)    

  

	 TEN ENT–as tenants by the entireties
	 	 Under Uniform Gifts to Minors

	 	 	Act (State)                                    
   

  
 JT TEN–as joint tenants with
right of survivorship and not as tenants in common 
  
 Additional abbreviations
may also be used though not in the above list. 
  
 For value received,
                             hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
  
 Please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee 
  

  

 (Please
print or typewrite name and address, including postal zip code, of assignee) 
  

  

  
 of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 

	 	


  

 , Attorney, to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises. 
  
 Dated 

	 	


  

  
 NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the
face of the Certificate, in every particular, without alteration or enlargement, or any change whatever. 
  

	Signature guaranteed:
	
	  
	

	THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBRO3KERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN
APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
Exhibit 32.2

I, Douglas J. Kelley,
 Chief Financial Officer of Fentura Financial,  Inc. certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
 Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
          period ended September 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of Fentura Financial, Inc.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
          period ended September 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of Fentura Financial, Inc.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated:  November 11, 2005 |  | /s/  Douglas J. Kelley
Douglas J. KelleyChief Financial Officer
|------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 16.1



            PRITCHETT, SILER & HARDY, P.C. LETTERHEAD


                                   April 15, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have read the statements of LifeSmart Nutrition Technologies, Inc.
(formerly Upland Energy Corporation) pertaining to our firm included under
Part II Item 5 of Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2002, and
agree with such statements as they pertain to our firm.  We have no basis to
agree or disagree with other statements of the registrant contained therein.

Sincerely,

/s/ Pritchett, Siler & Hardy, P.C.

PRITCHETT, SILER & HARDY, P.C.
583 A.2d 347

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT SMITH.

March 26, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Lakenheath strengthens royal ties during Joint WarriorPublished April 26, 2016
                        
                        By Senior Airman Nigel Sandridge
                        
                        
                        48th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **ROYAL AIR FORCE LOSSIEMOUTH, Scotland  (AFNS) --**
                Airmen from Royal Air Force Lakenheath, England, recently completed three weeks of intense threat-reaction training missions during Joint Warrior 2016 in Scotland.Joint Warrior is a NATO exercise, which prepares rescue coalition force units for potential real-world scenarios that could be encountered in deployed environments."This training has been incredibility valuable to us," said Lt. Col. Bernard Smith, the 56th Rescue Squadron commander. "It gave us the chance to get out of the crawl phase and go straight into the run phase when it comes pushing our limits and learning new skills that could ultimately save the lives of the people who need our help."Integrating with NATO allies, the 56th and 57th Rescue Squadrons were able to simulate various situations and execute successful combat search and rescue operations of crew members and allied forces caught in a high threat environment. Joint Warrior also helped enable the CSAR task force to formulate solutions that resulted in extraction for the downed personnel."Exercises like these really bring us out of our comfort zone," said Capt. Michael Bush, the 56th RQS director of staff. "It puts us in an environment where we have to work expeditionary and pick up on the go. This helps because it puts a healthy stress on the crews to pick up on the local surroundings and apply tactics to advance the recovery process."Bush participated as a survivor during a simulated hostile environment scenario, where he needed to alert NATO allies of his location, who then notified the 56th RQS of his position for recovery."I've learned a lot from these last three weeks of training," said Capt. Garrett Wilson, a 56th RQS co-pilot. "Since I'm still a young guy in the unit, this training gives me the chance to fly more frequently and really focus on the tactical side of our job in different terrain."Aside from providing better range opportunities for the rescue units, Joint Warrior prepared the squadrons for future taskings. The squadron must be highly trained and ready to perform at a moment's notice."The overall training at Joint Warrior 2016 has been amazing," Smith said. "Our NATO allies have provided us with scenarios that deliver a sense of realism for aircrews to adapt and find the best way of completing the mission. These are opportunities that we usually don't get, even in the States."England 



USAFE 



Pave Hawk 



HH-60G 



Joint Warrior 



exercise 



NATO 



Scotland 



training 



RAF Lakenheath
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
STATEMENT  OF  OPERATIONS  FOR THE THREE  MONTHS  ENDED  MARCH 31,  1997 AND THE
BALANCE  SHEET FOR THE PERIOD THEN ENDED,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         732,345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,457
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               947,661
<PP&E>                                         652,576
<DEPRECIATION>                               (199,038)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,771,149
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          455,646
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        120
<COMMON>                                         2,865
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,270,339
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,771,149
<SALES>                                        221,517
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               273,891
<CGS>                                           89,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  781,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,251
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (521,121)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (521,121)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (521,121)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
579 A.2d 1241

#### IN THE MATTER OF JILL L. TERRY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 28, 1990.

CORRECTED ORDER

JILL L. TERRY of EAST BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this state in 1983, having been Ordered to show cause why she should not be temporarily suspended from the practice of law,

And said JILL L. TERRY having failed to appear before the Court on the return date of her Order to Show Cause,

And good cause appearing;

IT IS ORDERED that the temporary suspension of JILL L. TERRY is hereby continued pending final disposition of ethics *276proceedings against her and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics take such protective action pursuant to *Rule*1:20-11(c), as may be appropriate to gain possession and control of the legal files, records, practice and trust assets of JILL L. TERRY wherever situate, pending further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, presently existing in any New Jersey financial institution including but not limited to Central Jersey Bank and Trust, Attorney Trust Account No. 72-901-9806, pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except upon application to this court, for good cause shown, pending the further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of her suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the Regulations Governing Suspended Attorneys.
Exhibit 35.1

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain
Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2011, by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer,
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, and Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2011-GC5 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not
otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I,
Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from October 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011, and of its performance per the Agreement
during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout
the period October 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 12thday of March 2012.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Daniel Bober        
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 134 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 134

    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to deny visas and 
  admission to aliens who have been unlawfully present in the United 
                     States for more than 6 months.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

 Mr. Gallegly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to deny visas and 
  admission to aliens who have been unlawfully present in the United 
                     States for more than 6 months.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF ALIENS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES 
              FOR MORE THAN 6 MONTHS.

    (a) In General.--Section 212(a)(9) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)(i)) is amended by striking 
subclauses (I) and (II) and inserting the following new subclauses:
                                    ``(I) has been unlawfully present 
                                in the United States for a period of 
                                more than 180 days but less than 1 year 
                                is inadmissible unless the alien has 
                                remained outside of the United States 
                                for a period totaling at least 3 years;
                                    ``(II) has been unlawfully present 
                                in the United States for 1 year or more 
                                is inadmissible unless the alien has 
                                remained outside of the United States 
                                for a period totaling at least 10 
                                years.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, except that no 
period of time before the date of the enactment of this Act shall be 
included in the time period described in section 212(a)(9)(B)(i) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (added by such amendment).
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trans Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lisa A. Corbitt, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906            of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

/S/ LISA A. CORBITT

Lisa A. Corbitt

Principal Accounting Officer

November 12, 2008

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### St. Louis, A. & T. R’y Co. v. John W. Robbins.

(No. 3323.)

Appeal from Smith County.

Einley, Marsh *&*Butler, counsel for appellant.

Whittaker & Bonner, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 43. *Bill of lading; stipulation in limiting liability of carrier held invalid; Railroad Co. v. Caldwell, 3 Civil Cas. Ct. App., sec. 439, overruled.*Appellee recovered of appellant a judgment for $294.20, damages for the loss of a bull shipped by him over appellant’s line of railway from Madison, Tenn., to Tyler, Tex. In the contract of shipment it was stipulated that, in the event *64of damage to the bull, appellee would not hold appellant liable for more than $30 damages. Appellant pleaded and insisted upon this stipulation, but it was disregarded in the judgment rendered.

December 14, 1889.

This court has held heretofore that such a stipulation in such a contract was valid, and binding upon the shipper, and that he could not recover more than the amount fixed thereby. We so held upon the authority of the supreme court of the United States in Hart v. Railroad Co., 112 U. S. 331, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 151, and other decisions cited in our opinion in the case of Railroad Co. v. Caldwell, 3 Civil Cas. Ct. App., § 439. We remarked in that opinion that the question had not been adjudicated by the courts of last resort in this state, but that we believed the weight of authority was that such a stipulation controlled the measure of damage, even where the damage results from the negligence of the carrier. Our supreme court, at its present term at this place, in the case of Railroad Co. v. Maddox, 'To Tex. 300, determined the precise question involved in the Caldwell case, *supra,*and in this case, and held contrary to the doctrine held by us in the Caldwell case; that is, they hold that such a stipulation in such a contract is not valid, and binding on the shipper, and does not control the measure of his damage, but that he may recover the damages to which he may show himself entitled under the measure of damages fixed by law. We regard the decision in the Maddox case as applicable to the question as presented in this case, and as in direct conflict with our decision in the Caldwell case. As it is desirable that the decisions of our courts of last resort should harmonize, and as the question upon which this conflict has occurred is one which has been but once passed upon by this court, we will overrule our opinion in the Caldwell case, and follow the decision of our supreme court in the Maddox case.

Affirmed.