alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10237

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAMACIO ANDRADE-CASTANEDA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:03-CR-295-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case following remands for

resentencing, Damacio Andrade-Castaneda raises arguments that are foreclosed

by the law of the case doctrine. See United States v. Matthews, 312 F.3d 652, 657

(5th Cir. 2002) (holding that under the law of the case doctrine, an issue of fact

or law decided on appeal may not be reexamined by the appellate court on a

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 5, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10237

2

subsequent appeal). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 4.3

(incorporated  by reference from  Registration  Statement on Form S-8 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 3, 2003)

















                                       12
<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                            McLEODUSA INCORPORATED

                     COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
                 (AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended
                                                                         June 30,              June 30,
                                                                   --------------------  -------------------
                                                                      2000      1999       2000       1999
                                                                      ----      ----       ----       ----
<S>                                                                  <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>
Computation of weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding:
Common shares, Class A, outstanding at the
 beginning of the period (A).....................................      575.5     446.7      472.8      382.1
Common shares, Class B, outstanding at the
 beginning of the period (B).....................................        ---       ---        ---        ---
Weighted average number of shares issued
 during the period (A)...........................................        3.1       2.7       56.3       41.1
                                                                     -------    ------    -------    -------
Weighted average number of common shares.........................      578.6     449.4      529.1      423.2
                                                                     =======    ======    =======    =======
Net loss.........................................................    $(139.3)   $(61.4)   $(211.4)   $(108.9)
                                                                     =======    ======    =======    =======
Loss per common share............................................    $ (0.24)   $(0.14)   $ (0.40)   $ (0.26)
                                                                     =======    ======    =======    =======
</TABLE>

(A) All shares have been adjusted to give effect to the three-for-one stock
    split effected in the form of a stock dividend effective April 24, 2000.

(B) The Class B common stock, $.01 par value per share is convertible on a one-
    for-one basis at any time at the option of the holder into Class A common
    stock.  As of March 31, 2000, all shares of Class B common stock have been
    converted into shares of Class A common stock.
News United States Air Force
 Smarter spending for Air Force acquisitionsPublished April 17, 2014
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Torri Ingalsbe
                        
                        
                        Air Force Public Affairs Agency Operating Location-P
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Finding efficiencies within the acquisition process was the top talking point for Maj. Gen. Wendy Masiello, deputy assistant secretary for contracting, when she spoke with members of the Air Force Association and the media during the AFA’s monthly breakfast April 16, 2014, in Arlington, Va.
“Our industry partners have been hearing that we are struggling budget-wise,” Masiello said. “The dollars are going down, and we need to work together to reduce the cost of the programs in the future so we can continue to afford the programs we already have in place.”
She said there have been great examples recently in better buying power practices, especially in the reduction of overhead costs and “cleaning up” the proposal processes.
“If there is one thing that can help us shrink our acquisition timeline, it’s to get those proposals right in the beginning,” she explained. 
Masiello noted challenges and opportunities to find savings still exist within the acquisition arena, particularly the supply chain management portion.
“There may be additional opportunities to find improvements in costs, and make sure that (the prime contractors) are truly getting the quality of work at the price we should be paying for that work from some of their suppliers,” she said.
Masiello briefed the audience on the top five priorities of the assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisition as a way ahead for more responsible and efficient spending, to include: staying focused on the high priority programs and keeping them on track; improving relationships and transparency with partners and stakeholders to include Congress and industry; owning the technical baseline for important programs; focusing on the better buying practices that will have the biggest payoff; and focusing on what technology means in building the Air Force for 2023 and beyond
Masiello said these are the key things Air Force acquisition experts are targeting to save dollars and continue efficient operations under more constrained budgets. 
“It’s our job to be responsible (to the tax payers) in managing those taxes and where we spend our money in the long run,” Masiello said.budget 



AFA Related Links
        LIEUTENANT GENERAL WENDY M. MASIELLO
                                April 24, 2014
                                Lt. Gen. Wendy M. Masiello is the Director of the Defense Contract Management Agency.  As the Director, she leads a Department of Defense agency that consists of more than 11,900 civilians and military personnel who execute worldwide contract management responsibilities, covering more than 20,000
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.4

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                           AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS
                                       OF
                            SILVERLEAF RESORTS, INC.

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors recommended to the Shareholders of
Silverleaf Resorts, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Corporation"), that the
Corporation's Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation ("Articles") and
the Amended and Restated Bylaws dated February 28, 1998 ("Restated Bylaws") be
amended to eliminate the classification and staggered terms of the Board of
Directors and to provide for the annual election of each member of the Board of
Directors;

         WHEREAS, at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of the
Corporation held on December 16, 2003, the Shareholders voted to approve
amendments to the Corporation's Articles and Bylaws to eliminate the
classification and staggered terms of the Board of Directors;

         Therefore, ARTICLE II, Section 2 of the Restated Bylaws is hereby
amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                  "Section 2--NUMBER AND TENURE

                           At any regular meeting or at any special meeting
                  called for that purpose, a majority of the entire Board of
                  Directors may establish, increase or decrease the number of
                  directors, provided that the number thereof shall not be less
                  than five (5), nor more than thirteen (13), and further
                  provided that the tenure of office of a director shall not be
                  affected by any decrease in the number of directors. Each
                  director shall serve for a term ending on the date of the
                  annual meeting of shareholders following the annual meeting at
                  which such director was elected and until the director's
                  successor is elected and qualified, or until the director's
                  resignation, removal (in accordance with the Articles and
                  these Bylaws) or death."

                            CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY

         I, Sandra G. Cearley, hereby certify that I am the Secretary of
Silverleaf Resorts, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Corporation"); and that the
foregoing Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws was adopted effective the
16th day of December, 2003, by the action of the Shareholders of the
Corporation.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of
the Corporation this 19TH day of February, 2004.


(S E A L)                           /s/ SANDRA G. CEARLEY
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Sandra G. Cearley, Secretary
BRIGADIER GENERAL EDWARD B. GALLANTEdward Bond Gallant was born in 1906 at Worcester, Mass. Graduating from high school at Worcester in 1924, he entered Holy Cross College, graduated in 1928 with a bachelor of science degree and received his bachelor of laws degree from Boston College Law School in 1936. He is a member of the Massachusetts Bar. 

Beginning his military service in 1925 as a member of the Enlisted Reserve Corps, General Gallant was commissioned a second lieutenant in 1928 and served in the organized Reserve Corps until July 27, 1933. Transferred to the Massachusetts National Guard he served until September 16, 1940 when called to active duty as a major and assigned to the General Headquarters Staff, Washington, D.C. 

Joining the War Department General Staff in 1942, General Gallant remained until 1945, during which time he was detailed to many special projects, including duties in England, North Africa and Sicily in connection with combat activities and as a member at the Cairo Conference. 

Graduating from the Army and Navy Staff College at Norfolk, Va., in 1945, General Gallant then went overseas to become budget officer for the Far East Command, with station at Manila, Philippine Islands and later in Tokyo, Japan. 

Returning to the States in 1946, the general was integrated into the regular service and appointed chief of the Estimates Branch, Budget Division, War Department General Staff, Washington, D.C., transferring to the U.S. Air Force in 1947 as director of budget for the Air Force, Washington, D.C. 

Going to Air Materiel Command Headquarters at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio in July 1949, General Gallant served as director of budget until 1952 when he went to Harvard University to attend the Advanced Management Program. Graduating from this course in 1953 he returned to Air Materiel Command as deputy comptroller. 

Reassigned in July 1954, the general was appointed deputy chief of the Army and Air Force Exchange Service, with Headquarters at New York, N.Y., and on Feb. 4, 1957 became special assistant to the chief of the Exchange Service. 

Going to Norton Air Force Base, Calif., July 1, 1957, General Gallant joined the 1002nd Inspector General Group as director of procurement inspection. 

His decorations include the Legion of Merit with oak leaf cluster.EFFECTIVE DATES OF PROMOTIONHe was promoted to first lieutenant (organized Reserve) Dec. 21, 1931; to first lieutenant (National Guard) June 27, 1933; to captain (National Guard) April 14, 1936; to major (temporary) Oct. 25, 1941; to lieutenant colonel (temporary) June 2, 1942; to colonel (temporary) July 17, 1944; to captain (permanent) July 11, 1946; to colonel (permanent) April 2, 1948; to brigadier general (temporary) July 25, 1955. 

(Up to date as of August 1957)
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Acting SecAF Fanning meets MacDill Airmen

              - Published  Aug. 30, 2013
              -                             By Staff Sgt. Brandon Shapiro                                                    
              - 6th Air Mobility Wing Public Affairs

**MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --  **
Acting Secretary of the Air Force Eric Fanning stopped here Aug. 29, to speak with Airmen, advocate their concerns and explain future force objectives.

Fanning, upon becoming the acting SecAF in June and having served as the undersecretary of the Air Force since April, has been making his way to as many bases as possible, to get a first-hand look at the missions and people who make up the Air Force.During his tour, Fanning visited the 6th Security Forces Squadron's marine patrol unit, U.S. Central Command, U.S. Special Operations Command, the KC-135 Stratotanker boom simulators, and the MacDill Area Resilience Center."I think it's awesome that SecAF Fanning wanted to meet with the Airmen of MacDill," said Tech. Sgt. Lamar Daniel, an 91st Air Refueling Squadron boom operator and simulator instructor. "It's important for our decision makers to see what happens at the ground-level and during our daily operations."One of the key intentions of the tour was to meet with Airmen and answer their questions. Fanning ended his tour by gathering the masses for a 6th Air Mobility Wing all call.During the all call, Fanning detailed leadership's diligence to resolve budget issues, discussed trending sexual assault problems, and explained how we need to tell the "Airman's story."During the event, Airmen also asked Fanning for clarification on the war in Afghanistan, sequestration, a possible Air Force drawdown and military benefits.Fanning stated, leadership is doing everything in their power to meet the needs of the Airman. But, with the looming budget issues he emphasized the need to work together. "Staying flexible and resilient will be a must," Fanning said. Prior to his departure, Fanning reiterated two vital points: taking care of one another and bracing for the days of uncertainty."The Air Force is a resilient organization when it is focused on something and it knows how to figure out the solution," Fanning said. "We need to take care of our wingman and increase our efforts during this trying time."

MacDill Air Force BaseSecAF
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 12 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 12

To permit certain school districts in Illinois to be reconstituted for 
    purposes of determining assistance under the Impact Aid program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

   Mr. Kirk introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit certain school districts in Illinois to be reconstituted for 
    purposes of determining assistance under the Impact Aid program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR IMPACT AID PAYMENT.

    (a) Local Educational Agencies.--Notwithstanding section 8013(9)(B) 
of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
7713(9)(B)), North Chicago Community Unit School District 187, North 
Shore District 112, and Township High School District 113 in Lake 
County, Illinois, and Glenview Public School District 34 and Glenbrook 
High School District 225 in Cook County, Illinois, shall be considered 
local educational agencies as such term is used in and for purposes of 
title VIII of such Act.
    (b) Computation.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
federally connected children (as determined under section 8003(a) of 
the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7703(a))) 
who are in attendance in the North Shore District 112, Township High 
School District 113, Glenview Public School District 34, and Glenbrook 
High School District 225 described in subsection (a), shall be 
considered to be in attendance in the North Chicago Community Unit 
School District 187 described in subsection (a), solely for purposes of 
computing the amount that the North Chicago Community Unit School 
District 187 is eligible to receive under subsection (b) or (d) of such 
section, if--
            (1) such school districts have entered into an agreement 
        for such students to be so considered and for the equitable 
        apportionment among all such school districts of any amount 
        received by the North Chicago Community Unit School District 
        187 under such section; and
            (2) any amount apportioned among all such school districts 
        pursuant to paragraph (1) is used by such school districts only 
        for the direct provision of educational services.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE ex rel. Derrick CARTER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-1668.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 2012.

In re Carter, Derrick; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. N, No. 06-90-1446; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 KW 0129.

Denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 28, 2003 (the "Form 10-K") of
LDM Technologies, Inc. (the "Issuer").

         I, Gary E. Borushko, Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify
         that:

         (i)      The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.

Dated: December 11, 2003

                                                /s/ Gary E. Borushko
                                                --------------------
                                                Gary E. Borushko
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                LDM Technologies, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
         FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HEMASURE INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
         1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
         STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                 0000919745
<NAME>                                HemaSure Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000
<CURRENCY>                            U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                        JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                       1
<CASH>                                5,339
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                         124
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           278
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      6,882
<PP&E>                                3,547
<DEPRECIATION>                        2,208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        8,271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 2,394
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                              152
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                            677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          8,271
<SALES>                               132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      132
<CGS>                                 1,432
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         1,432
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      5,653
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    (1,113)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (7,934)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (7,934)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          (7,934)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0


</TABLE>
KINGS ROAD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
                             A Delaware corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kings Road Entertainment,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Geraldine Blecker, Chief Executive Officer, and I, H. Martin
DeFrank, President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authentication, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed from within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kings Road
Entertainment, Inc., and will be retained by Kings Road Entertainment, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





                                               /s/ Geraldine Blecker
Dated:  December 5, 2003                       _________________________________
                                               By:  Geraldine Blecker
                                               Its:  Chief Executive Officer



                                               /s/ H. Martin DeFrank
Dated:  December 5, 2003                       _________________________________
                                               By:  H. Martin DeFrank
                                               Its:  Chief Financial Officer