alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, JEFFREY I. DREBEN, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of CVF Technologies
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual
Report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, result of operation and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is being
     prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this Annual Report based on such evaluation.

          c) disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the registrant's
     internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
     registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
     quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
     is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

          a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
     affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
     financial information; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting.

Dated: April 7, 2006

                                        CVF TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION


                                        /s/ Jeffrey I. Dreben
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        JEFFREY I. DREBEN
                                        Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1430 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1430

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the diversity 
                           immigrant program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2007

  Mr. Goodlatte (for himself, Ms. Herseth, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Sam 
Johnson of Texas, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Issa, Mr. Linder, Mr. King of Iowa, 
 Mr. Kline of Minnesota, Mr. Cantor, Mr. David Davis of Tennessee, Mr. 
Akin, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. Gingrey, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Shadegg, Mr. 
Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Goode, Mr. Boucher, Mr. Kuhl of New York, 
  Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, and Mr. DeFazio) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the diversity 
                           immigrant program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as--
            (1) the ``Security and Fairness Enhancement for America Act 
        of 2007''; or
            (2) the ``SAFE for America Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT PROGRAM.

    (a) Worldwide Level of Diversity Immigrants.--Section 201 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by inserting ``and'' at the end of paragraph 
                (1);
                    (B) by striking ``; and'' at the end of paragraph 
                (2) and inserting a period; and
                    (C) by striking paragraph (3); and
            (2) by striking subsection (e).
    (b) Allocation of Diversity Immigrant Visas.--Section 203 of such 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1153) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (c);
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``(a), (b), or (c),'' 
        and inserting ``(a) or (b),'';
            (3) in subsection (e), by striking paragraph (2) and 
        redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2);
            (4) in subsection (f), by striking ``(a), (b), or (c)'' and 
        inserting ``(a) or (b)''; and
            (5) in subsection (g), by striking ``(a), (b), and (c)'' 
        and inserting ``(a) and (b)''.
    (c) Procedure for Granting Immigrant Status.--Section 204 of such 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a)(1)(I); and
            (2) in subsection (e), by striking ``(a), (b), or (c)'' and 
        inserting ``(a) or (b)''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on October 1, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
OF ADVOCAT INC.
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
  (a)
    
    fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  /s/ William R. Council, IIIWilliam R. Council, IIIChief Executive Officer/s/ L. Glynn Riddle, Jr.L. Glynn Riddle, Jr.Chief Financial Officer  44
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS  SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 (UNAUDITED)
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,639
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,258
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (684)
<INVENTORY>                                     37,393
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,476
<PP&E>                                          31,687
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,389)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,135
<BONDS>                                         22,613
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,989
<SALES>                                         30,364
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,173
<CGS>                                           20,646
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (475)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (475)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (475)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
<FN>
<F1>PROVISION FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS AND INVENTORY PROVISIONS INCLUDED IN TOTAL
COSTS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21


           SUBSIDIARIES OF CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS OF PUERTO RICO, INC.

        All of the corporations listed below were incorporated in Delaware
        except where otherwise noted:


          CCPR, Inc.
          CCPR Services, Inc.
          CCPR of the Virgin Islands, Inc.
          CCPR Paging, Inc.
          CCPR Telecommunications, Inc.
          Merrimack Telecommunications Corp. (Florida corporation)
          San Juan Cellular Telephone Company (District of Columbia
          partnership)
          SJCT, Inc.
          USVI Cellular Telephone Corporation
          USVI Paging, Inc.
#### City of Brownwood v. W. A. Farmer.

(No. 2514.)

Appeal from Brown. County.

*(Transferred from Austin.)*

Bogan & Mayes, counsel for appellant.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 350. *City officer not entitled to compensation for services not provided for by ordinance; case stated.*In April, 1886, appellee qualified as, and entered upon the discharge of the duties of, tax assessor and collector for the municipal corporation of the city of Brownwood. As such officer he assessed the taxable property within the limits of said corporation for the year 1886, and made out and presented to the city council assessment rolls which were received and approved by said council. The amount of taxable property shown by said rolls was $891,229. Said rolls were presented to and approved by the city council August 21, 1886. At the time appellee entered upon the discharge of the duties of said office, and at the time he made said assessment, no compensation for such services had been provided by said corporation. But on August 10, 1886, the city council enacted an ordinance which provided that the assessor and collector of the city should receive for his services the same commissions as are allowed the county collector and assessor for similar service, etc. Under this ordinance appellee claimed that he was entitled to receive as compensation for said assessment five per cent, upon the amount of said rolls, to wit, the sum of $115.61, and for this amount he presented his claim to the city council. That tribunal considered that he was entitled to receive ouly one-third of the amount claimed by him, to wit, fills.51, which amount was paid to him, he receiving it, however, without prejudice to his claim for the full *420amount. Upon this state of facts appellee brought this suit to recover the balance claimed by him to be due for said assessment, and alleged said facts in his petition. Appellant demurred to the petition, which demurrer was overruled, and upon a trial of the case appellee recovered judgment as prayed for in his petition. *Held:*The court erred in overruling the demurrer to the petition. It presented no legal cause of action. Officers of a municipal corporation are not entitled to recover compensation for official services rendered by them, when at the time of the performance of said services compensation therefor has not been fixed and declared by the proper corporate authority. [1 Dillon, Munic. Corp. (3d ed.) § 230; Bogden v. Brookline, 8 Vt. 284; 1 App. C. C. § 75.]

December 7, 1887.

§ 351. *Construction of city ordinance.*The correct construction of the ordinance under which appellee claims compensation entitles him to no more than the amount he has already received. This was the construction placed upon the ordinance by those who enacted it, and who certainly ought to know its meaning. The ordinance is ambiguous in its language; but when construed in connection with the law of the state to which it refers, and in the light of the facts of the case, we think the interpretation given it by the city council is reasonable and correct.

Reversed and dismissed.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 12-3598

___________

LINDSWORTH SESSAY,

 Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,

 Respondent

_________________________________

On Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals

(Agency No. A076-576-183)

Immigration Judge: Honorable Leo A. Finston

________________

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

________________

Present: SCIRICA, JORDAN and GREENBERG Circuit Judges

The petitions for panel rehearing in the above-entitled case having been submitted 

to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, and the members of the panel 

having voted for rehearing, the petitions for rehearing are GRANTED. The opinion and 

judgment entered March 27, 2013 are hereby vacated. A subsequent opinion will be 

issued.
BY THE COURT,

/s/ Anthony J. Scirica

Circuit Judge

DATED: May 1, 2013

SLC/cc: Lindsworth Brown-Sessay

Lindsay M. Murphy

Nicole Prairie
MPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0340

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MATTHEW SEVERSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 7-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including December 1, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 15 2023

11/15/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0340
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
John W. Cooley, certify that:

1.           I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of FX Alliance Inc.;

2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.           The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.           The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



/s/ JOHN W. COOLEY John W. Cooley Chief Financial OfficerMarch 29, 2012


---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 91 (Tuesday, June 6, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1163]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  TRIBUTE TO A 31ST DISTRICT VOLUNTEER

                                 ______

                           HON. AMO HOUGHTON

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, June 6, 1995
  Mr. HOUGHTON. Mr. Speaker, I'd like to take a minute to make a few 
remarks in recognition of a very special lady. Dorothy Brownell is a 
remarkable woman. She has a wonderful blend of energy, wit, and 
commitment. She keeps everyone around her on their toes.
  A former school dental hygienist, she officially retired in 1976. I 
got to know her during her second career--as a volunteer. For more than 
7 years, she has been the cornerstone of our Jamestown district office. 
She could write the book on volunteerism--that is, if she ever slowed 
down long enough to put pen to paper.
  Let me recap just a few of her interests. She has dished up food at a 
local food bank; is an officer with the local chapter of the American 
Association of Retired Persons, Foster Grandparents Program, and the 
United Senior Council; worked with the United Way; has been an 
ombudsman for long-term care at an area nursing home, and worked on the 
county Veterans' Listing Program. You'll have to take my word for it--
this litany only scratches the surface. Other activities have been 
sandwiched between trips to Ireland, Italy, and any number of our own 
States.
  Dorothy has been recognized for her efforts. She received the New 
York State Legislative Achievement Award; was named United Senior 
Council's 1990 Senior Citizen of the year; received a Certificate of 
Achievement from Manor Oak Nursing Home and another for her work with 
Catholic Charities Outreach for the Aging. On top of that, Dorothy took 
a silver medal for swimming in the 1990 Senior Olympics.
  What prompts my remarks today is that Dorothy, at the tender age of 
77, is calling it quits. She's launching her second retirement with a 
train trip across Canada and following up with courses at Elderhostels. 
To record that she'll be missed is an understatement--but this little 
lady with the great big heart deserves the very best life has to offer.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,076,493
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  411,334
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (15,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    502,660
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,041,173
<PP&E>                                         276,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,317,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,203,365
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,887
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,842,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,317,288
<SALES>                                      4,219,703
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,219,703
<CGS>                                        3,657,121
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,657,121
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,240,227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,526,452)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,526,452)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,526,452)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.99)


</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Kenyon BUDWINE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1618.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Budwine, Kenyon; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. A, Nos. 20349-07, 22116-03; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 10-00346.

Denied.
#### A. C. Rogers v. C. R. Fox.

(No. 6201.)

Appeal from Cooke County.

Blanton & Wright, counsel for appellant.

Potter & Potter, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 85. *Exemptions; married man living apart from wife and children entitled to as head of a family; costs; rule governing taxation of.*Appellee, Fox, sued appellant upon an open account, and-caused a writ of attachment to be issued, and levied upon a horse and wagon. In the justice court Fox recovered a judgment for the sum of $22.60, with a foreclosure of the attachment lien on the horse, the justice holding that the wagon was exemph Rogers appealed to the county court, and in that court Fox had a judgment for the sum of $21.94, with foreclosure of the lien on both horse and wagon, and from *127that judgment Rogers appeals to this court. Rogers claimed that the horse and wagon levied on wTere exempt property, for the reason that he was a married man and head of a family. The agreed statement of the facts shows that Rogers is a married man, having married in Tennessee about twelve years ago, and that he has a wife and five children living in Montague county, Texas. He has not been living with his wife since January, 1887, but is not divorced. He has not contributed’ anything to her support since January, 1887. Rogers is a resident citizen of Cooke county. The ivrit was levied in January, 1888. The court charged the jury to find iu favor of Rogers on his claim that the property was exempt if he “was a married man with a family dependent upon him, and that he was a consistent part of said family,” etc. We are of the opinion that the court erred in this charge, and that the charge requested by appellant should have been given, that he was entitled to recover on his plea that he was a married man and the head of a family. We see nothing in the agreed facts in this case to warrant any further qualification of his right to have the law protect his exemption. As will be seen, the judgment in the justice court is for $22.60, and that in the county court was for $21.94. The court taxed the costs of the county court against defendant. This was error. [Art. 1432, R. S.] The statute gave defendant his costs in the county court, as the judgment there recovered against him ivas for less than the judgment .in the justice court. It is true that the court is authorized, for good cause stated in the record, to adjudge the costs otherwise, but none appears here. There is found in the record what appear to be sworn statements of jurors who tried the case that they intended to give the plaintiff a larger verdict. This cannot serve a good cause or any other purpose.

April 23, 1890.

Reversed and remanded.