I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1363 

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to improve the nutrition and 

health of schoolchildren by updating the definition of ‘‘food of minimal 

nutritional value’’ to conform to current nutrition science and to protect 

the Federal investment in the national school lunch and breakfast programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2007 

Ms. WOOLSEY (for herself and Mr. SHAYS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to improve the 

nutrition and health of schoolchildren by updating the 

definition of ‘‘food of minimal nutritional value’’ to conform to current nutrition science and to protect the 

Federal investment in the national school lunch and 

breakfast programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Nutrition Pro5 motion and School Lunch Protection Act of 2007’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1363 IH

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

2 Congress finds that— 

3 (1) for a school food service program to receive 

4 Federal reimbursements under the Child Nutrition 

5 Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et seq.) or the Richard 

6 B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 

7 1751 et seq.), school meals served by that program 

8 must meet science-based nutritional standards estab9 lished by Congress and the Secretary of Agriculture; 

10 (2) foods sold individually outside the school 

11 meal programs (including foods sold in vending ma12 chines, a la carte or snack lines, school stores, and 

13 snack bars) are not required to meet comparable nu14 tritional standards; 

15 (3) in order to promote child nutrition and 

16 health, Congress— 

17 (A) has authorized the Secretary to estab18 lish nutritional standards in the school lunch19 room during meal time; and 

20 (B) since 1979, has prohibited the sale of 

21 food of minimal nutritional value, as defined by 

22 the Secretary, in areas where school meals are 

23 sold or eaten; 

24 (4) Federally-reimbursed school meals and child 

25 nutrition and health are undermined by the uneven 

26 authority of the Secretary to set nutritional standVerDate Aug 31 2005 17:22 Mar 10, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1363.IH H1363

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1363 IH

1 ards throughout the school campus and over the 

2 course of the school day; 

3 (5) since 1979, when the Secretary defined the 

4 term ‘‘food of minimal nutritional value’’ and pro5 mulgated regulations for the sale of those foods dur6 ing meal times, nutrition science has evolved and ex7 panded; 

8 (6) the current definition of ‘‘food of minimal 

9 nutritional value’’ is inconsistent with current knowl10 edge about nutrition and health; 

11 (7) because some children purchase foods other 

12 than balanced meals provided through the school 

13 lunch program established under the Richard B. 

14 Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 

15 et seq.) and the school breakfast program estab16 lished by section 4 of the Child Nutrition Act of 

17 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1773), the efforts of parents to en18 sure that their children consume healthful diets are 

19 undermined; 

20 (8) experts in nutrition science have found 

21 that— 

22 (A) since 1963, rates of obesity have quad23 rupled among children ages 6 to 11 and tripled 

24 among children ages 12 to 19; 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
4 

•HR 1363 IH

1 (B) since 1971, obesity rates have tripled 

2 among children ages 2 to 5; 

3 (C) only 2 percent of children eat a healthy 

4 diet that is consistent with Federal nutrition 

5 recommendations; 

6 (D) 3 out of 4 high school students do not 

7 eat the minimum recommended number of 

8 servings of fruits and vegetables each day; and 

9 (E) type 2 diabetes, which is primarily due 

10 to poor diet and physical inactivity, is rising 

11 rapidly in children; 

12 (9) in 1996, children aged 2 to 18 years con13 sumed an average of 118 more calories per day than 

14 similar children did in 1978, which is the equivalent 

15 of 12 pounds of weight gain annually, if not com16 pensated for through increased physical activity; and 

17 (10) according to the Surgeon General, the di18 rect and indirect costs of obesity in the United 

19 States are $117,000,000,000 per year. 

20 SEC. 3. FOOD OF MINIMAL NUTRITIONAL VALUE. 

21 Section 10 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 

22 U.S.C. 1779) is amended— 

23 (1) by striking the section heading and all that 

24 follows through ‘‘(a) The Secretary’’ and inserting 

25 the following: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
5 

•HR 1363 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 10. REGULATIONS. 

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary’’; and 

3 (2) by striking subsections (b) and (c) and in4 serting the following: 

5 ‘‘(b) FOOD OF MINIMAL NUTRITIONAL VALUE.— 

6 ‘‘(1) PROPOSED REGULATIONS.— 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 

8 days after the date of enactment of this para9 graph, the Secretary shall promulgate proposed 

10 regulations to revise the definition of ‘food of 

11 minimal nutritional value’ that is used to carry 

12 out this Act and the Richard B. Russell Na13 tional School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et 

14 seq.). 

15 ‘‘(B) APPLICATION.—The revised defini16 tion of ‘food of minimal nutritional value’ shall 

17 apply to all foods sold— 

18 ‘‘(i) outside the school meal programs; 

19 ‘‘(ii) on the school campus; and 

20 ‘‘(iii) at any time during the school 

21 day. 

22 ‘‘(C) REQUIREMENTS.—In revising the 

23 definition, the Secretary shall consider— 

24 ‘‘(i) both the positive and negative 

25 contributions of nutrients, ingredients, and 

26 foods (including calories, portion size, satuVerDate Aug 31 2005 17:22 Mar 10, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1363.IH H1363

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
6 

•HR 1363 IH

1 rated fat, trans fat, sodium, and added 

2 sugars) to the diets of children; 

3 ‘‘(ii) evidence concerning the relation4 ship between consumption of certain nutri5 ents, ingredients, and foods to both pre6 venting and promoting the development of 

7 overweight, obesity, and other chronic ill8 nesses; 

9 ‘‘(iii) recommendations made by au10 thoritative scientific organizations con11 cerning appropriate nutritional standards 

12 for foods sold outside of the reimbursable 

13 meal programs in schools; and 

14 ‘‘(iv) special exemptions for school15 sponsored fundraisers (other than fund16 raising through vending machines, school 

17 stores, snack bars, a la carte sales, and 

18 any other exclusions determined by the 

19 Secretary), if the fundraisers are approved 

20 by the school and are infrequent within the 

21 school. 

22 ‘‘(2) IMPLEMENTATION.— 

23 ‘‘(A) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

24 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Except as pro25 vided in clause (ii), the proposed regulaVerDate Aug 31 2005 17:22 Mar 10, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1363.IH H1363

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
7 

•HR 1363 IH

1 tions shall take effect at the beginning of 

2 the school year following the date on which 

3 the regulations are finalized. 

4 ‘‘(ii) EXCEPTION.—If the regulations 

5 are finalized on a date that is not more 

6 than 60 days before the beginning of the 

7 school year, the proposed regulations shall 

8 take effect at the beginning of the fol9 lowing school year. 

10 ‘‘(B) FAILURE TO PROMULGATE.—If, on 

11 the date that is 1 year after the date of enact12 ment of this paragraph, the Secretary has not 

13 promulgated final regulations, the proposed reg14 ulations shall be considered to be final regula15 tions.’’. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS