alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Keystone National Bank v. A. Hinchman.

(No. 2859.)

Appeal from Dallas County.

*(Transferred from Austin, J*

Dickson & Maroney,'counsel for. appellant.

•Edward Gray, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 375. *Plea of privilege to be sued in county of residence held to come too late.*Appellant having a claim against Bowman & Ferguson, Mitchell & Scruggs and appellee, placed the same with a justice of the peace for suit. Bowman & Ferguson resided in Coryell county; appellee resided in McLennan county; Mitchell & Scruggs resided in Dallas county, the county in which the suit *449was instituted. The justice docketed the suit as The Keystone National Bank v. All of Said Defendants. Citations for the non-resident defendants were issued and forwarded to the proper counties by the justice. The justice’s docket recited that citations had also issued for Mitchell and Scruggs, but in fact no citations had been issued for them.

October 31, 1888.

In the justice’s court appellee answered to the merits, and appellant dismissed its suit as to Bowman and Férguson. Appellee, after answering to the merits, dis-' covered that citations had not been issued, for Mitchell and Scruggs, and he thereupon asked permission to withdraw his plea to the merits, and plead his privilege to be sued in the county of his residence. This motion the justice denied, and rendered judgment- against appellee for the amount sued for, from which judgment appellee appealed to the county court. In the county court appellee renewed his said motion and the same was granted, and he thereupon pleaded his privilege, which plea was sustained, and the suit was dismissed a.t the cost of appellant. *Held:*The county court erred in entertaining the plea of privilege. The plea came too late after answer to the merits. If appellee was misled by the justice’s docket as to the issuance of citation for Mitchell and Scruggs, it was not because of any fault or deception on the part of appellant, for appellant’s attorney had, at the time of placing the claim with the justice, directed that citations should be issued for said Mitchell and Scruggs. No fraud or deception in the matter was practiced by appellant or its attorney to induce appellee to answer to the merits, or to prevent him from pleading his privilege.

Eeversed and remanded.
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1236 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the United States Postal Service to issue a 

semipostal to raise funds for breast cancer research. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HR 1236 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY. 

2 Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is 

3 amended by striking ‘‘2007’’ and inserting ‘‘2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

5 The National Institutes of Health and the Depart6 ment of Defense shall each submit to Congress and the 

7 Government Accountability Office an annual report con8 cerning the use of any amounts that it received under sec9 tion 414(c) of title 39, United States Code, including a 

10 description of any significant advances or accomplish11 ments, during the year covered by the report, that were 

12 funded, in whole or in part, with such amounts. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 30, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: April 19Published April 19, 2016
                        
                        By Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** – In this look around the Air Force, Airmen provide earthquake relief in Japan and a dozen F-22 Raptors from Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, deploy to Royal Air Force Lakenheath, England. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Traci Keller.
For previous episodes, click here for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- Yokota aids GoJ with earthquake relief
- F-22 deployment to EuropeF-22 



Raptor 



RAF Lakenheath 



C-130 



Japan 



Yokota 



earthquake 



relief 



ATAF
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1138 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1138

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 306 East Main Street in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, as the ``J. 
   Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 306 
East Main Street in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``J. Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``J. Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 26, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1138

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 306 East Main Street in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, as the ``J. 
   Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trans Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John S. Tumis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/S/ John S. Tumis


John S. Tumis


Chief Financial Officer


June 17, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1285 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1285

  To provide for the conveyance of a parcel of National Forest System 
land in Kittitas County, Washington, to facilitate the construction of 
         a new fire and rescue station, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2007

 Mr. Hastings of Washington (for himself and Mr. Reichert) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the conveyance of a parcel of National Forest System 
land in Kittitas County, Washington, to facilitate the construction of 
         a new fire and rescue station, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Snoqualmie Pass Land Conveyance 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LAND CONVEYANCE, NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND, KITTITAS COUNTY, 
              WASHINGTON.

    (a) Conveyance Required.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall 
convey, without consideration, to the King and Kittitas Counties Fire 
District #51 of King and Kittitas Counties, Washington (in this section 
referred to as the ``District''), all right, title, and interest of the 
United States in and to a parcel of National Forest System land in 
Kittitas County, Washington, consisting of approximately three acres 
within the NW\1/4\,SW\1/4\,SE\1/4\ of section 4, township 22 north, 
range 11 east, Willamette meridian, for the purpose of permitting the 
District to use the parcel as a site for a new Snoqualmie Pass fire and 
rescue station.
    (b) Reversionary Interest.--If the Secretary determines at any time 
that the real property conveyed under subsection (a) is not being used 
in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance specified in such 
subsection, all right, title, and interest in and to the property shall 
revert, at the option of the Secretary, to the United States, and the 
United States shall have the right of immediate entry onto the 
property. Any determination of the Secretary under this subsection 
shall be made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing.
    (c) Survey.--If necessary, the exact acreage and legal description 
of the lands to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by 
a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost of a survey shall be 
borne by the District.
    (d) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require 
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance 
under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect 
the interests of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     I, Brent W. Christensen, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Meade Instruments Corp.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting     Date: May 31, 2005   By: /s/ Brent W. Christensen      Senior Vice President – Finance and CFO
#### Schneider & Davis v. Leibes Bros. & Co.

(No. 5186.)

Appeal from Dallas County.

Crawford & Crawford and J. M. Dickson, for appellants.

No counsel appeared for appellees.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 286. *Stoppage in transitu; facts held to show that the right of had ceased to exist.*Appellees sold, on-a credit, to Loeb *&*Freiberg two cases of cigars of the value of 1454.73, and shipped the same by railroad, marked to said Loeb & Freiberg at Dallas, and at the same time forwarded to said consignees a bill of lading therefor. Loeb & Freiberg received said bill of lading, and on the morning of January 12, 1885, they transferred the same for a valuable consideration to appellants, who on the same morning demanded of, and received from. the agent of the railroad company, the said goods, and carried and stored the same in their business house. On the evening of the same day appellees sought to exercise their right of stoppage *in transitu*upon said goods, by notifying said railroad agent to not deliver said goods to said consignees, etc. Said agent informed them that said goods had already been delivered to appellants. Appellees then brought this suit to. recover of appellants the value of said goods, and recovered judgment therefor. *Held:*The facts show that appellees have no cause of action against appellants. The title to the goods had vested in Loeb & Freiberg by virtue of the sale, and the delivery to them of the bill of lading. This title was complete, subject, however, to appellees’ right of stoppage *in transitu,*while such right existed. This right, however, ceased to exist as soon as the goods came into the possession of said consignees, or of appellants, their assignees. It is clear from the evidence that appellees did not at*351tempt to exercise their right of stoppage *in transitu*until after the goods had been legally delivered to, and were in the actual possession of, appellants. [Adoue & Loeb v. Seeligson & Co. 54 Tex. 593; Chandler v. Fulton, 10 Tex. 2; Stuart & Sutherland v. Mau & Co. 2 W. Con. Rep. § 787; Hutch, on Carriers, § 129.] If the transfer of the goods by Loeb & Freiberg to appellants was fraudulent, it would not defeat appellees’ right of stoppage, but there .is no evidence of fraud in the transaction. On the contrary the evidence proves that the transaction was *bona fide*and valid.

April 31, 1887.

Reversed and dismissed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1203]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        TRIBUTE TO JOHN F. LONG

                                 ______

                         HON. JERRY F. COSTELLO

                              of illinois

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, June 8, 1995
  Mr. COSTELLO. Mr. Speaker, I want to bring to the attention of my 
colleagues the outstanding service to our Nation of Mr. John F. Long, 
of East St. Louis, IL. John Long served as a U.S. soldier from the 
125th Infantry, who served his country during World War II.
  Mr. Long, originally from Cairo, IL, entered the U.S. Army in October 
1941, and fought a number of World War II battles in Italy. Those 
conflicts included Rome, Arno, the Appennines, and the Po Valley.
  Private Long's bravery won him the Good Conduct Medal, World War II 
Victory Medal, American Defense Ribbon, American Theater Ribbon, 
European African Middle Eastern Theater Ribbon with three Bronze battle 
stars, and one service stripe.
  John Long, who will turn 76 on June 15, was honorably discharged from 
the U.S. Army in November 1945. This year commemorates the 50th 
anniversary of his World War II service, and I am confident he watched, 
as we all did, the recent commemoration of V-E Day. On this glorious 
day, 50 years ago, John Long joined his fellow servicemen to accept the 
surrender of the Axis Powers to the Allied victors. His Army service in 
the battles of Italy was part of this victory, a contribution we honor 
in the House today.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James S.J. Manuso, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of SuperGen, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SuperGen, Inc.

Date:

November 4, 2010



By:

/s/ JAMES S.J. MANUSOName:

James S.J. ManusoTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


I,
Michael Molkentin, certify, Amendment No. 1 to the pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of SuperGen, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of SuperGen, Inc.

Date:

November 4, 2010



By:

/s/ MICHAEL MOLKENTINName:

Michael MolkentinTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
#### C. C. Daugherty v. H. H. Belew.

(No. 2865.)

Appeal from Collin County.

Abernathy Bros, counsel for appellant.

W. S. Sproles, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 395. *Warranty of title to land; breach of; case stated.*One Williams conveyed to appellee Belew two tracts of land by warranty deed. Belew executed a note for a part of the purchase money of said land, which note was recited in said deed, and constituted a valid vendor’s lien upon the land. Belew thereafter sold and conveyed by warranty deed the said land to one Stimson, who in like manner sold and conveyed the same to one Warden, who in like manner sold and conveyed the' same to appellant. Saidpurchase-mono3r note came into the hands of one Dement, who sued Belew thereon, joining appellant in said suit as a defendant, and said Dement recovered judgment in said suit. Under process issued upon said judgment said land was advertised for sale, and, to prevent the sale, appellant paid off said judgment and then brought this suit against all of said warrantors for damages for breach of their said warranties. Judgment was rendered for the defendants, the cause having been tried by the judge without a jury. *Held*error. Upon the facts as alleged and proved, the plaintiff, appellant, should have recovered judgment against the defendants for the amount paid by him in discharge of said judgment, said amount being less than *469the amount he had paid for the land when he purchased it. [Clark v. Mumford, 62 Tex. 535.]

November 28, 1888.

Reversed and remanded.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PointTherapeutics, Inc. (“Point”) for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald R. Kiepert, Jr.,Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations ofPoint. 

Dated: November 9, 2007 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Point Therapeutics, Inc.(“Point”) for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard N. Small, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Point. 

Dated: November 9, 2007 

 

A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906 has been providedto Point Therapeutics, Inc. and will be retained by Point Therapeutics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.