alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 3.(iv)
                                                                  --------------
                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                     BOULDER CAPITAL OPPORTUNITIES III, INC.


         Pursuant  to the  provisions  of the  Colorado  Corporation  Code,  the
undersigned  corporation  adopts the  following  articles  of  amendment  to its
articles of incorporation:

FIRST:         The name of the corporation is BOULDER CAPITAL OPPORTUNITIES III,
               INC.

SECOND:        The following  amendment was adopted by the  shareholders  of the
               corporation on November 28, 1996, in the manner prescribed by the
               Colorado Corporation Code:

                    (1)  Subparagraph  (b) of Section A of ARTICLE  THIRD of the
               articles of incorporation of the corporation  shall be amended in
               its entirety to read as follows:

               (b) the  holders  of Common  Stock  shall have  unlimited  voting
               rights, including the right to vote for the election of directors
               and on all other matters requiring stockholder action. Cumulative
               voting  shall not be  permitted  in the  election of directors or
               otherwise.

THIRD:         The  amendment  was adopted by the board of directors  because no
               shares have been issued.

FOURTH:        The amendment does not provide for an exchange,  reclassification
               or cancellation of any issued shares of the corporation.

FIFTH:         The  amendment  does not  effect a change in the amount of stated
               capital of the corporation.

Dated: December 24, 1996.

                                         BOULDER CAPITAL OPPORTUNITIES III, INC.


                                         By:   /s/ Robert Soehngen
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Robert Soehngen, Director
News United States Air Force
 AF general shatters both gender, racial barriersPublished March 12, 2015
                        
                        By Martha Lockwood
                        
                        
                        Air Force News Service
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                Born about the time the Tuskegee Airmen were earning their reputation over the skies of North Africa and Italy, Marcelite Harris would go on to break a number of racial and gender barriers during an illustrious Air Force career.Harris was born Jan. 16, 1943, in Houston and attended Spelman College in Atlanta, where she earned a bachelor's degree in speech and drama in 1964. She then attended Officer Training School at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, where she was commissioned a second lieutenant in 1965.During the early days of her career, Harris held assignments as an administrative officer in California and West Germany, before transitioning into the maintenance field by attending the aircraft maintenance officer's course at Chanute Air Force Base, Illinois, and graduating as the first female aircraft maintenance officer.Her first assignment as a maintenance officer was to support the Vietnam War as a maintenance supervisor with the 49th Tactical Fighter Squadron at Korat Royal Thai Air Base, Thailand. After stints back in California and Washington, D.C., Harris broke another barrier as one of the first women to be an air officer commanding at the U.S. Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado.After commanding an avionics maintenance squadron and a field maintenance squadron, both in Kansas, and a director of maintenance in Okinawa, Japan, Harris would make another first - this time as the first woman deputy commander for maintenance.But her biggest accomplishment lay ahead, when in 1991, Harris became the first female African-American general, when she pinned on her first star as the vice commander of the Oklahoma Center Air Logistics Center.Harris retired from the Air Force in early 1997, where she had been serving as the director of maintenance, deputy chief of staff for logistics, Headquarters Air Force. At that time, she was the highest ranking female officer in the Air Force and the highest ranking African-American female within the Defense Department.Harris continues to contribute to the Air Force even after her retirement. In 2010, President Barack Obama appointed her a member of the Board of Visitors for the U.S. Air Force Academy. As a board member, she inquiries into the morale, discipline, curriculum and other matters deemed appropriate. The board submits reports to the secretary of Defense and the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and Congress via the secretary of the Air Force.As she continues to serve the Air Force she serves her community. She is a member of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. For her works, in 2010 she was nationally recognized by the Black Girls Rock Foundation with the Trailblazer Award.Marcelite Harris 



heritage 



Women’s History Month
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,310
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,736
<PP&E>                                          26,537
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,908
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,728
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,401
<SALES>                                         68,682
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,058
<CGS>                                            6,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,886
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,524
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,664
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,984
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,024
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,960
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,960
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.22
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                              COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                          Exhibit 11


                                                THREE MONTHS ENDED        NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                   SEPTEMBER 30,           SEPTEMBER 30,

                                               1996         1995         1996         1995
                                            -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
<S>                                         <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>

PRIMARY:
Net income                                  $ 3,125,000  $ 1,435,000  $ 8,031,000  $ 3,106,000
                                            ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========

Shares as adjusted:
Weighted average common shares outstanding   23,871,409   18,114,728   22,577,376   15,572,997
Assumed conversion of Series A convertible
  preferred stock                                     -    1,039,748            -    2,153,793
Incremental shares from outstanding stock
  options as determined under the treasury
  stock method                                  319,537      376,715      361,580      303,971
                                            -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------

Shares as adjusted                           24,190,946   19,531,191   22,938,956   18,030,761
                                            ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========

Net income per share                        $       .13  $       .07  $       .35  $       .17
                                            ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========



FULLY DILUTED:
Net income                                  $ 3,125,000  $ 1,435,000  $ 8,031,000  $ 3,106,000
                                            ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========

Shares as adjusted:
Weighted average common shares outstanding   23,871,409   18,114,728   22,577,376   15,572,997
Assumed conversion of Series A convertible
preferred stock                                       -    1,039,748            -    2,153,793
Incremental shares from outstanding stock
options as determined under the treasury
stock method                                    393,088      418,871      420,860      418,871
                                            -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------

Shares as adjusted                           24,264,497   19,573,347   22,998,236   18,145,661
                                            ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========

Net income per share                        $       .13  $       .07  $       .35  $       .17
                                            ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========

</TABLE>
#### J. W. Campbell v. T. S. Heflin.

(No. 6366.)

Appeal from Caldwell County.

Thomas McNeal, counsel for appellant.

Stringfellow & Wilson and P. J. Greenwood, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 90. *Landlord and tenant; estoppel; answer setting up held sufficient.*This was a suit by Heflin against Campbell, as administrator of one Hendry, for $280, it being for fourteen months’ rent of a store-house at $20 per month. Appellant pleaded general denial, and specially, in substance, that Hendry had rented the house from one Munster, who had long been the owner of the lot on which the house was built; that he, Munster, built said, house, and had possession and control of the same; that while he, Munster, had executed a deed to the lot to appellee, Heflin, the said deed was but a mortgage, and Munster was to repay Heflin his money loaned upon the same at the rate of $30 per month; that Hen-dry paid his rents regularly as they fell due to said Munster, and that Heflin knew the facts, lived in the same town, made no objections, acquiesced in the situation, and never claimed any rents of Hendry, and only asserted this claim after Hendry died and Munster had become insolvent. On general demurrer of plaintiff this special answer of defendant was stricken out, and de*133fendant refused to amend. We are of opinion that the answer was legitimate, and that it set up a good defense to plaintiff’s suit. It was therefore error for the court to sustain the demurrer to and strike out the said answer.

April 23, 1890.

Reversed and remanded.
#### In re Appeal of DECISION OF DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 10-PDB-096.

No. 2011-OB-0663.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2011.

In re Helmer, Brad et al.; Shultz, Brandy; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Appeal of *121Decision of Disciplinary Board Office of Disciplinary Board, No. 10-PDB-096.

Leave to appeal denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2202

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Globetel Communications Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Timothy Huff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas Y. Jimenez,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to our knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and 2. the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of
     operations of the Company.


Timothy Huff


/s/ Timothy Huff

Chief Executive Officer



Thomas Y. Jimenez

/s/ Thomas Y. Jimenez

Chief Financial Officer


August 19, 2003
Exhibit 31.2I, Douglas J. Kelley, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fentura Financial, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting     Dated: November 10, 2006 /s/ Douglas J. Kelley     Douglas J. Kelley    Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 10.4
    
    EXECUTION VERSION
 AMENDMENT NUMBER 8  TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LOAN AGREEMENT
 Naamloze Vennootschap Naamloze Vennootschap
 W I T N E S S E T H
    Defined Terms
 Full Force and Effect
 E27




---



##### 



Amendments to the Loan Agreement
 Conversion Date
  Eligible Container:
 Purchase Parameters
 Casualty Losses
 Title
 Maximum Concentration of Non-Monthly Lease Agreements
 Valid and Perfected Security Interest
 Maximum Concentration of Refrigerated Containers
 Specialized Containers
 E28




---



##### 



Maximum Lessee Concentrations
 Exhibit E
  Maximum Concentration of Finance Leases
 Maximum Concentration of Non-USD Denominated Leases
 Compliance with ISO; Age; Term Lease provided
 Purchase Price
 Lessee Bankruptcy
 Representations, Warranties and Covenants
  Effectiveness of Amendment; Terms of this Amendment
 E29




---



##### 



Execution in Counterparts
 Governing Law THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO CONFLICT OF LAW PRINCIPLES; PROVIDED THAT
SECTION 5-1401 AND 5-1402 OF THE NEW YORK GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW SHALL APPLY, AND THE OBLIGATIONS,
RIGHTS AND REMEDIES OF THE PARTIES HEREUNDER SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF NEW YORK.
 Consent to Jurisdiction E30
        No Novation
  E31




---



##### 



CF LEASING LTD.By:
    
    /s/ DENNIS J. TIETZName:
    
    Dennis J. TietzTitle:
    
    Director
  E32




---



##### 



FORTIS BANK (NEDERLAND) N.V.,as Agent and a LenderBy:
    
    /s/ MERIJN ZONDAGName:
    
    Merijn ZondagTitle:
    
    Managing DirectorBy:
    
    /s/ B. A. EGBERINKName:
    
    B. A. EgberinkTitle:
    
    Head of Corporate Credit Support
  E33




---



##### 



BTMU CAPITAL CORPORATION, as a LenderBy:
    
    /s/ CHERYL A. BEHAMName:
    
    Cheryl A. BehanTitle:
    
    Senior Vice President
  E34




---



##### 



HSH NORDBANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH,as a LenderBy:
    
    /s/ MATHIS SHINNICKName:
    
    Mathis ShinnickTitle:
    
    Executive Vice PresidentBy:
    
    /s/ LINH. DUONEName:
    
    Linh. DuoneTitle:
    
    Vice President
 E35




---



##### 



WESTLB AG, NEW YORK BRANCH, as a LenderBy:
    
    /s/ CARYN SUFFREDININame:
    
    Caryn SuffrediniTitle:
    
    DirectorBy:
    
    /s/ SALVATORE BATTINELLIName:
    
    Walter T. Duffy IIITitle:
    
    Managing Director
 E36




---



##### 



NIBC BANK N.V., as a LenderBy:
    
    /s/ MAURICE L. WIJMANSName:
    
    Maurice L. WijmansTitle:
    
    Associate DirectorBy:
    
    /s/ AAT A. VAN RHIJNName:
    
    Aat A. van RhijnTitle:
    
    Associate Director
 E37
581 A.2d 874

#### IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS F. O’GORMAN, III, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

November 15, 1990.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that the petition for reinstatement is granted; subject, however to the condition that respondent shall submit an annual certified audit of his trust account records for the calendar years 1990 and 1991, said audits to be filed with the Office of the Attorney Ethics within 30 days of the conclusion of each year.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Denard, Jean, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant.Rivkin Radler, LLP (Cheryl F. Korman and Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin S. Garson, J.), entered October 26, 2015. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath (EUOs).</p><p>Contrary to plaintiff's arguments, defendant's proof was sufficient to establish, prima facie, that plaintiff had failed to appear for the scheduled EUOs (<a href="../2006/2006_09604.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.</i>, 35 AD3d 720</a> [2006]), and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in response. Plaintiff's remaining contention lacks merit (<a href="../2014/2014_00092.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Interboro Ins. Co. v Clennon</i>, 113 AD3d 596</a>, 597 [2014]; <a href="../2017/2017_50208.htm" target="_blank"><i>Parisien v Metlife Auto &amp; Home</i>, 54 Misc 3d 143</a>[A], 2017 NY Slip Op 50208[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2017]).</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: May 18, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at September 27, 1996
(unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1996
<CASH>                                          95,877
<SECURITIES>                                    53,322
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                        37
<INVENTORY>                                     16,604
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,407
<PP&E>                                          21,987
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 199,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,192
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            78
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   199,925
<SALES>                                         66,204
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,204
<CGS>                                           30,924
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,181
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,683
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,006
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,677
<DISCONTINUED>                                   3,636
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 53,572
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,885
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.94
        

</TABLE>
583 A.2d 328

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MILTON RIDER.

February 26, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.