57502 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Notices 

briefs must conform with the provisions 

of section 207.65 of the Commission’s 

rules; the deadline for filing is January 

20, 2011. Parties may also file written 

testimony in connection with their 

presentation at the hearing, as provided 

in section 207.24 of the Commission’s 

rules, and posthearing briefs, which 

must conform with the provisions of 

section 207.67 of the Commission’s 

rules. The deadline for filing 

posthearing briefs is February 10, 2011; 

witness testimony must be filed no later 

than three days before the hearing. In 

addition, any person who has not 

entered an appearance as a party to the 

reviews may submit a written statement 

of information pertinent to the subject of 

the reviews on or before February 10, 

2011. On March 7, 2011, the 

Commission will make available to 

parties all information on which they 

have not had an opportunity to 

comment. Parties may submit final 

comments on this information on or 

before March 9, 2011, but such final 

comments must not contain new factual 

information and must otherwise comply 

with section 207.68 of the Commission’s 

rules. All written submissions must 

conform with the provisions of section 

201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any 

submissions that contain BPI must also 

conform with the requirements of 

sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the 

Commission’s rules. The Commission’s 

rules do not authorize filing of 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means, except to 

the extent permitted by section 201.8 of 

the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 

FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even 

where electronic filing of a document is 

permitted, certain documents must also 

be filed in paper form, as specified in 

II(c) of the Commission’s Handbook on 

Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR 

68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). 

Additional written submissions to the 

Commission, including requests 

pursuant to section 201.12 of the 

Commission’s rules, shall not be 

accepted unless good cause is shown for 

accepting such submissions, or unless 

the submission is pursuant to a specific 

request by a Commissioner or 

Commission staff. 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, 

each document filed by a party to the 

reviews must be served on all other 

parties to the reviews (as identified by 

either the public or BPI service list), and 

a certificate of service must be timely 

filed. The Secretary will not accept a 

document for filing without a certificate 

of service. 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of 

the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is 

published pursuant to section 207.62 of 

the Commission’s rules. 

Issued: September 14, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23474 Filed 9–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Robotics Technology 

Consortium, Inc. 

Correction 

In notice document 2010–22215 

beginning on page 54914 in the issue of 

Thursday, July 9, 2010, make the 

following corrections: 

1. On page 54914, in the first column, 

in the sixteenth line below the 

document subject, ‘‘AEB, Inc.’’ should 

read ‘‘ABB, Inc.’’. 

2. On the same page, in the same 

column, in the 23rd line below the 

document subject, ‘‘BEN Technologies 

Corp’’ should read ‘‘BBN Technologies 

Corp’’. 

3. On the same page, in the same 

column, in the eighth line from the 

bottom of the page, ‘‘Amstin, TX’’ should 

read ‘‘Austin, TX’’. 

4. On the same page, in the same 

column, in the last line of the column, 

‘‘101–Integrated Consultants, Inc.’’ 

should read ‘‘ICI–Integrated Consultants, 

Inc.’’ 

5. On the same page, in the third 

column, in the first full paragraph, in 

the second and third lines, ‘‘activity of 

this group research additional written 

membership’’ should read ‘‘ activity of 

the group research project. Membership 

in this group research project remains 

open, and RTC intends to file additional 

written notifications disclosing all 

changes in membership.’’ 

6. On the same page, in the same 

column, in the second full paragraph, in 

the first through sixth lines, ‘‘On 

October 15, pursuant to Section the 

group research project. Membership in 

the project remains open, and RTC 

intends to file notifications disclosing 

all changes. In 2009, RTC filed its 

original notification 6(a) of the Act.’’ 

should read, ‘‘On October 15, 2009, RTC 

filed its original notification pursuant to 

section 6(a) of the Act.’’ 

[FR Doc. C1–2010–22215 Filed 9–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–74,281] 

Humana Insurance Company, a 

Division Of Carenetwork, Inc., Green 

Bay, WI; Notice of Affirmative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated August 23, 2010, 

petitioners requested administrative 

reconsideration of the negative 

determination regarding workers’ 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers 

and former workers of the subject firm. 

The determination was issued on 

August 13, 2010. The Notice of 

Determination was published in the 

Federal Register on August 30, 2010 (75 

FR 52986). Workers are engaged in 

employment related to the supply of 

health insurance benefits. 

The negative determination 

applicable to workers and former 

workers at Humana Insurance Company, 

a Division of CareNetwork, Inc., Green 

Bay, Wisconsin was based on the 

findings that the subject firm did not, 

during the period under investigation, 

shift to a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with the supply of 

health insurance benefits provided by 

the workers or acquire these services 

from a foreign country; that the workers’ 

separation, or threat of separation, was 

not related to any increase in imports of 

like or directly competitive services; 

and that the workers did not supply a 

service that was directly used in the 

production of an article or the supply of 

service by a firm that employed a 

worker group that is eligible to apply for 

TAA based on the aforementioned 

article or service. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

petitioners provided additional 

information pertaining to a shift in 

services abroad. 

The Department has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the workers meet the 

eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 

of 1974. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 182 / Tuesday, September 21, 2010 / Notices 57503 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of 

September 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23495 Filed 9–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration 

[Docket No. OSHA–2010–0029] 

Application for Training Grant; 

Extension of the Office of Management 

and Budget’s (OMB) Approval of 

Information Collection (Paperwork) 

Requirements 

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA), Labor. 

ACTION: Request for public comment. 

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public 

comments concerning its proposal to 

extend the Office of Management and 

Budget’s (OMB) approval of the 

information collection requirements 

contained in the Training Grant 

Application. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted 

(postmarked, sent, or received) by 

November 22, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: 

Electronically: You may submit 

comments and attachments 

electronically at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, which is the 

Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the 

instructions online for submitting 

comments. 

Facsimile: If your comments, 

including attachments, are not longer 

than 10 pages, you may fax them to the 

OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648. 

Mail, hand delivery, express mail, 

messenger, or courier service: When 

using this method, you must submit 

three copies of your comments and 

attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, 

Docket Number OSHA–2010–0029, U.S. 

Department of Labor, Room N–2625, 

200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20210. Deliveries 

(hand, express mail, messenger, and 

courier service) are accepted during the 

Department of Labor’s and Docket 

Office’s normal business hours, 8:15 

a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t. 

Instructions: All submissions must 

include the Agency name and OSHA 

docket number for this Information 

Collection Request (ICR) (OSHA–2010– 

0029). All comments, including any 

personal information you provide, are 

placed in the public docket without 

change, and may be made available 

online at http://www.regulations.gov. 

For further information on submitting 

comments see the ‘‘Public Participation’’ 

heading in the section of this notice 

titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. 

Docket: To read or download 

comments or other material in the 

docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov 

or the OSHA Docket Office at the 

address above. All documents in the 

docket (including this Federal Register 

notice) are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index; however, 

some information (e.g., copyrighted 

material) is not publicly available to 

read or download through the Web site. 

All submissions, including copyrighted 

material, are available for inspection 

and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. 

To obtain a copy of the ICR, you may 

contact Theda Kenney or Todd Owen at 

the Directorate of Standards and 

Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of 

Labor, Room N–3609, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; 

telephone: (202) 693–2222. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Technical: Kimberly A. Newell, OSHA 

Directorate of Training and Education, 

2020 S. Arlington Heights Road, 

Arlington Heights, IL 60005–4102; 

telephone: (847) 759–7700; e-mail: 

HarwoodGrants@dol.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

The Department of Labor, as part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, 

conducts a preclearance consultation 

program to provide the public with an 

opportunity to comment on proposed 

and continuing information collection 

requirements in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program 

ensures that information is in the 

desired format, reporting burden (time 

and costs) is minimal, collection 

instruments are clearly understood, and 

OSHA’s estimate of the information 

collection burden is accurate. The 

Occupational Safety and Health Act of 

1970 (the OSH Act) authorizes 

information collection by employers as 

necessary or appropriate for 

enforcement of the OSH Act or for 

developing information regarding the 

causes and prevention of occupational 

injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29 

U.S.C. 657). 

Section 21 of the OSH Act (29 U.S.C. 

670) authorizes the Occupational Safety 

and Health Administration (‘‘OSHA’’ or 

the ‘‘Agency’’) to conduct directly, or 

through grants and contracts, education 

and training courses. These courses 

must ensure an adequate number of 

qualified personnel to fulfill the 

purposes of the Act, provide them with 

short-term training, inform them of the 

importance and proper use of safety and 

health equipment, and train employers 

and workers to recognize, avoid, and 

prevent unsafe and unhealthful working 

conditions. 

Under Section 21, the Agency awards 

grants to non-profit organizations to 

provide part of the required training. To 

obtain such a grant, an organization 

must complete the training grant 

application. OSHA uses the information 

in this application to evaluate: The 

organization’s competence to provide 

the proposed training (including the 

qualifications of the personnel who 

manage and implement the training); 

the goals and objectives of the proposed 

training program; a workplan that 

describes in detail the tasks that the 

organization will implement to meet 

these goals and objectives; the 

appropriateness of the proposed costs; 

and compliance with Federal 

regulations governing nonprocurement 

debarment and suspension, maintaining 

a drug-free workplace, and lobbying 

activities. Also required is a program 

summary that Agency officials use to 

review and evaluate the highlights of 

the overall proposal. 

After awarding a training grant, OSHA 

uses the work plan and budget 

information provided in the application 

to monitor the organization’s progress in 

meeting training goals and objectives, as 

well as planned expenditures. The 

initial grant award is for one year. 

II. Special Issues for Comment 

OSHA has a particular interest in 

comments on the following issues: 

• Whether the proposed information 

collection requirements are necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

Agency’s functions, including whether 

the information is useful; 

• The accuracy of the Agency’s 

estimate of the burden (time and costs) 

of the information collection 

requirements, including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions used; 

• The quality, utility, and clarity of 

the information collected; and 

• Ways to minimize the burden on 

employers who must comply; for 

example, by using automated or other 

technological information collection 

and transmission techniques. 

III. Proposed Actions 

OSHA is requesting that OMB extend 

its approval of the information 

collection requirements contained in the 

Training Grant Application. The Agency 

is requesting to increase its current 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES