alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                          9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000                    
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1,449
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         8,076
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         144,185
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           143,268
<LOANS>                                        228,768
<ALLOWANCE>                                    427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 408,590
<DEPOSITS>                                     247,010
<SHORT-TERM>                                   61,900
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            7,121
<LONG-TERM>                                    54,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       225
<OTHER-SE>                                     38,134
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 408,590
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                11,404
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              7,407
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               147
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               18,958
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             8,158
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,119
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          6,681
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  101
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                6,813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,219
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     3,193
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,193
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 2.62
<LOANS-NON>                                    581
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               421
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  101
<RECOVERIES>                                   6
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              427
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           427
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### JEWELERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. PIPELINE SERVICES, INC., et al.

No. 2012-CC-0478.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 2012.

In re Jack Sutton Co., Inc.; — Other; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. E, No. 08-06928 C/W 08-9756 C/W 08-09875; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-C-1718.

Writ denied.
583 A.2d 333

#### JULES LIPPE AND CORRINE LIPPE v. THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD. JULES LIPPE AND CORRINE LIPPE v. THE TOWNSHIP OF SCOTCH PLAINS. JULES LIPPE AND CORRINE LIPPE v. GEO-TECH ASSOCIATES, INC.

March 7, 1990.

Cross-Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Eurotech, Ltd., a District of
Columbia corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randolph A. Graves, Jr., Vice President,
Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




                           /s/ Randolph A. Graves, Jr.
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                           Randolph A. Graves, Jr.
                           Vice President, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer



May 6, 2003
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                          METACREATIONS CORPORATION
                      STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF
                      NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)
                                 (Unaudited) 

<TABLE> 
                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED      SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                 JUNE 30,               JUNE 30,
                                        -----------------------     ------------------
                                              1997       1996        1997       1996
                                        -----------------------     ------------------
 
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED (1)
<S>                                         <C>        <C>          <C>        <C> 
Weighted average shares outstanding for
 the period.............................      22,825     20,554      22,549     20,435
 
Common equivalent shares, including
 items pursuant to Staff Accounting
 Bulletin No. 83........................          --      2,239          --      2,335
                                        -----------------------     ------------------
Shares used in per share calculation....      22,825     22,793      22,549     22,770
                                        =======================     ==================
 
Net income (loss).......................    $(12,354)   $ 1,760    $(12,786)   $ 2,035
                                        =======================    ===================
 
Net income (loss) per common share......    $  (0.54)   $  0.08    $  (0.57)   $  0.09
                                        =======================    ===================
 
</TABLE>
(1)  Primary and fully diluted calculations are substantially the same.

                                       25
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20012

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERTO RIOJAS, JR.; DAVID CANTU; PEDRO MORENO; RAMIRO RIOJAS;

LUIS MORENO; LAZARO MORENO; IRELA YVETTE RIOJAS GONZALEZ;

MELBA RIOJAS MORENO; ROSANNA RIOJAS GUERRERO; JOSE LUIS CANTU;

EDUARDO MORENO; RENE GONZALEZ; CESAR MORENO, SR.; RENATO RIOJAS;

a/k/a Renato Riojas-Sandoval,

Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-95-CR-142

- - - - - - - - - -

July 11, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Cantu appeals from the district court’s order revoking

the magistrate judge’s order of release pending trial. The

district court’s decision rests on its conclusion that Cantu

presents a danger to any other person or the community and no
No. 97-20012

- 2 -

conditions will reasonably assure safety, and that Cantu presents

a risk of flight and no conditions will reasonably assure Cantu’s

appearance as required. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) and (f). The

district court’s conclusion is supported by the record. See

United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir. 1992). The

district court’s detention order as to David Cantu is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

|I, Patrick Vogt, certify that:
|------------------------------
|                              
|1                             
|                              
|2                             
|                              
|                              
|                              
|3                             
|                              
|                              
|                              
|4                             
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|5                             
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              

|Dated: May 10, 2007 | By: | /s/ PATRICK VOGT                      | 
|------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------- | 
|                    |     | Patrick Vogt                          | 
|                    |     | President and Chief Executive Officer | 

---
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-57985) of Docucorp International, Inc. of our
report dated October 1, 2004 relating to the financial statements, which appears
in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated October 1, 2004 relating to the financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Dallas, Texas
October 14, 2004






                                       60
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial statements accompanying the filings of Form 10-KSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                                   60,019
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         6,413,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                            285,000
<INVENTORY>                                           3,602,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     10,182,508
<PP&E>                                                1,225,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                          603,729
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       10,867,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 5,656,042
<BONDS>                                                  17,444
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                              5,229,740
<OTHER-SE>                                              (35,922)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         10,867,304
<SALES>                                              23,997,212
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     23,997,212
<CGS>                                                16,527,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        22,836,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         19,948
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      181,127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         959,348
<INCOME-TAX>                                           (105,239)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   1,064,587
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                          1,064,587
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               .17



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                      PROJECT SOFTWARE & DEVELOPMENT, INC.

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Three months      Three months        Six months         Six months
PRIMARY:                                  ended             ended              ended              ended
                                        03/31/97           03/31/96           03/31/97           03/31/96
                                        --------           --------           --------           --------
<S>                                     <C>                <C>                <C>                <C>      
Weighted average common shares   
outstanding ..................          9,767,352          9,574,503          9,737,837          9,571,130
Common stock equivalents .....            366,442            444,693            393,003            462,919
                                      -----------        -----------        -----------        -----------
                                       10,133,794         10,019,196         10,130,840         10,034,049
                                      -----------        -----------        -----------        -----------

Net income ...................        $ 1,535,729        $ 1,447,287        $ 5,064,556        $ 3,574,739

Net income per share .........        $      0.15        $      0.14        $      0.50        $      0.36


FULLY DILUTED:
Weighted average common shares  
outstanding ..................          9,767,352          9,574,503          9,737,837          9,571,130
Common stock equivalents .....            366,593            471,253            411,131            495,052
                                      -----------        -----------        -----------        -----------
                                       10,133,945         10,045,756         10,148,968         10,066,182
                                      -----------        -----------        -----------        -----------

Net income ...................        $ 1,535,729        $ 1,447,287        $ 5,064,556        $ 3,574,739
Net income per share .........        $      0.15        $      0.14        $      0.50        $      0.36
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

I, James S.J. Manuso, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of SuperGen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
SuperGen, Inc.

| |  | By:    |  | /s/JAMES S.J. MANUSO                                               
| |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Name:  |  | James S.J. Manuso                                                  
| |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

I,
Michael Molkentin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
SuperGen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of SuperGen, Inc.

| |  | By:    |  | /s/MICHAEL MOLKENTIN                                                
| |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Name:  |  | Michael Molkentin                                                   
| |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

---



QuickLinks
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Matthew ARNOLD.

No. 2011-KK-0626.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2011.

*600PER CURIAM.1

| lAfter review, we find the trial court erred in granting the motions to suppress the evidence and the statements on the basis of *Arizona v. Gant,*— U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009), which we find to be distinguishable. The facts of this case indicate there was no search incident to arrest as in *Gant;*rather, after arresting defendant for a traffic violation, one officer entered defendant’s vehicle for the purpose of securing it by rolling up the windows and turning off the engine. In the process of performing this “caretaking” function,2 the officer observed, in plain view, an unzipped backpack behind the passenger seat containing three plastic bags of marijuana. Because (1) there was prior justification for the police intrusion into the vehicle for purposes of turning off the engine and rolling up the windows, and (2) it was immediately apparent to the officer without close inspection that the backpack contained contraband, the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement applies, and the seizure of the contraband was permissible. *See Horton v. California,*496 U.S. 128, 135-136, 110 S.Ct. 2301, 2307, 110 L.Ed.2d 112 (1990); *State v. Leger,*205-0011, p. 65 (La.7/10/06), 936 So.2d 108, 155, *cert. denied,*549 U.S. 1221, 127 S.Ct. 1279, 167 L.Ed.2d 100 (2007).

In any event, the testimony establishes that upon their initial approach, the officers detected a “strong odor” of marijuana emanating from the rolled-down windows of the vehicle, which, viewed objectively, provided the officers with probable cause to search the passenger compartment pursuant to the automobile exception to the warrant requirement. *See State v. Allen,*10-1016, p. 1 (La.5/7/10), 55 So.3d 756; *State v. Waters,*00-0356, p. 7 (La.3/12/01), 780 So.2d 1053, 1058.

Finally, because the seizure was proper and probable cause existed for defendant’s arrest, the statements made by defendant, after being advised of his *Miranda*rights, are admissible.

The rulings suppressing the evidence and the statements are reversed, and defendant’s motions to suppress are denied. This matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

WRIT GRANTED; REVERSED AND REMANDED; STAY DENIED AS MOOT.

JOHNSON, J., and KNOLL, J., would deny.

1

. Kimball, C.J., not participating in the decision.

2

. In *Cady v. Dombrowski,*413 U.S. 433, 441, 93 S.Ct. 2523, 2528, 37 L.Ed.2d 706 (1973), the Supreme Court recognized that police officers, particularly in dealing with vehicular traffic, do have safety and welfare duties apart from the detection, investigation, or acquisition of evidence relating to the violation of a criminal statute.
#### Lori TAPPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D10-947.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 15, 2011.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Richard B. Greene, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Lori Tapper (hereinafter “defendant”), appeals revocation of her probation after the trial court found that she violated its terms by using intoxicants to excess not prescribed by a physician. We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court finding and determining valid grounds to revoke defendant’s probation. However, a formal, written order of revo*880cation of probation is required pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.995. *See Green v. State,*23 So.3d 820, 821 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). We affirm the revocation of probation and subsequent sentence, but remand the case for the trial court to enter a written order of revocation of probation.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 12.1


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Year Ended December 31,
                                                              -----------------------
                                                      1995     1996     1997     1998     1999
                                                      -----   ------   ------   ------   ------
<S>                                                   <C>      <C>     <C>      <C>      <C>
Earnings:
    Income from continuing operations
      before provision for income taxes               3,058    8,409   18,984   29,810   31,356
    Interest expense                                  3,609    4,759    4,664    7,150   16,773
    Interest component of rent expense                   87      119      227      367      995
    Amortization of previously capitalized interest      --      497      520    1,008    1,212
                                                      -----   ------   ------   ------   ------
Earnings                                              6,754   13,784   24,395   38,335   50,336
                                                      =====   ======   ======   ======   ======

Fixed Charges:
    Interest expense                                  3,609    4,759    4,664    7,150   16,773
    Interest capitalized                                516      711      823    2,662    2,748
    Interest component of rent expense                   87      119      227      367      995
                                                      -----   ------   ------   ------   ------
Fixed Charges                                         4,212    5,589    5,714   10,179   20,516
                                                      =====   ======   ======   ======   ======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                      1.6      2.5      4.3      3.8      2.5
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 3,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert N. Wildrick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|Date: June 16, 2003 |  | /s/ROBERT N. WILDRICKRobert N. Wildrick
Chief Executive Officer
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks