alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1998
<CASH>                                             677
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     46,954
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,876
<PP&E>                                          47,674
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,917
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,279
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,303
<SALES>                                         43,383
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,383
<CGS>                                           22,151
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,438
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,357
<INCOME-TAX>                                       529
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                828
<DISCONTINUED>                                     (51)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       777
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        


</TABLE>
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 11

- 00549

- CR Jerry Soliz MARTINEZ , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 437th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2008CR1459 Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebecca S immons , Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 21, 2011
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION Appellant Jerry Soliz Martinez was sentenced on June 22, 2011. Because he did not file a motion for new trial, appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed no later than July 22,
2011. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 26.2(a). Our records show (1) the notice of appeal was not filed until July 29, 2011, and (2) no motion for extension of time was filed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 26.3.04

- 11

- 00549

- CR

- 2

- On August 17, 2011, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by September 1, 2011, why his appeal should not be dismissed for wa nt of jurisdiction. 1 To date, this court has not received any response to the order. This court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal of a criminal conviction in the absence of a timely, written notice of appeal. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (“ When a notice of appeal is filed within the fifteen

- day period [after the notice of appeal was due to be filed] but no timely motion for extension of time is filed, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction .”); Shute v. State , 744 S.W.2d 96 , 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been ma de part of the record.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d). Appellant’s counsel notified this court in writing that counsel has reviewed the record and “can find no right of appeal for Appellant.”
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1079 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1079

    To amend title 49, United States Code, to limit fees imposed in 
   connection with background checks for the issuance of licenses to 
  operate a motor vehicle transporting a hazardous material, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2007

 Mr. Carnahan (for himself, Mr. Skelton, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. LaTourette, 
Mr. McCotter, and Mr. Graves) introduced the following bill; which was 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the 
  Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 49, United States Code, to limit fees imposed in 
   connection with background checks for the issuance of licenses to 
  operate a motor vehicle transporting a hazardous material, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Professional Driver Background Check 
Efficiency Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. BACKGROUND RECORDS CHECKS FOR MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSES FOR THE 
              TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.

    Section 5103a(d) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Cost.--The total amount of a fee imposed upon a 
        person to cover costs, including administrative and other 
        costs, associated with carrying out a background records check 
        under this section shall not exceed $50.
            ``(4) Assistance to states.--The Secretary may reimburse a 
        State for costs incurred by the State in connection with 
        background records checks carried out under this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
September 21, 1979.

422 A.2d 1170

#### Commonwealth ex rel. Morgan v. Kuhn, Appellant.

Argued March 21, 1979.

Michael J. Pepe, Jr., for appellant; Jean Kuhn Morgan, appellee, in pro. per.

Before PRICE, SPAETH and LIPEZ, JJ.

Order affirmed.
H. R. 1119 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

An Act 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to revise the congressional charter of 

the Military Order of the Purple Heart of the United States of America, Incorporated, to authorize associate membership in the corporation for the spouse 

and siblings of a recipient of the Purple Heart medal. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Purple Heart Family Equity 

Act of 2007’’. 

SEC. 2. ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP IN THE MILITARY ORDER OF THE 

PURPLE HEART OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

INCORPORATED. 

Section 140503(b) of title 36, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘parents and lineal descendants’’ and inserting ‘‘the 

parents, spouse, siblings, and lineal descendants’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,553,241
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             8,000,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 16,011,513
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         190,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           190,505
<LOANS>                                     92,969,902
<ALLOWANCE>                                    987,208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             126,905,809
<DEPOSITS>                                 111,606,007
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            594,046
<LONG-TERM>                                  4,740,724
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,804
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,903,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             126,905,809
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,163,611
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              274,320
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                65,956
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,503,887
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,035,657
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,127,062
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,376,825
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   36,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,072,203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                454,550
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     454,550
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   275,305
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0.045
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,438,278
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              3,280,718
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               952,902
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    7,436
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,742
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              987,208
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           987,208
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        525,498
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32
 *
  (i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  
 
  
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as required by Section 906, is
not deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to the
rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said
Act. E3
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 19, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00367-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.R., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-07130

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Mother’s counsel contends that there is no non-frivolous ground to challenge 

the trial court’s judgment terminating Mother’s parental rights to the Child because 

there is legally and factually sufficient evidence to support at least one predicate 

ground for termination, including endangerment under subsection (E), and that 

termination is in the Child’s best interest. 

The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there 

are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See In re D.E.S., 135 S.W.3d 326, 329 
2

(Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, no pet.) (Anders procedures apply to an 

appeal from termination of parental rights). Mother’s counsel notified this court 

that counsel delivered to Mother a copy of the Anders brief and this court’s letter

informing Mother about how to obtain a copy of the record and her right to file a 

pro se response. See id. at 329–30. No pro se response has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that there is no

non-frivolous ground to challenge the trial court’s judgment terminating Mother’s 

parental rights because the evidence is legally and factually sufficient to support 

the trial court’s best-interest finding and the finding that Mother engaged in 

conduct that endangered the physical or emotional well-being of the Child under 

Section 161.001(b)(1)(E) of the Family Code. We find no reversible error in the 

record. A detailed discussion of this issue would add nothing to the jurisprudence 

of the state. See In re D.E.S., 135 S.W.3d at 330.

Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Poissant.
News United States Air Force
 F-16 aircraft accident near CharlestonPublished July 7, 2015
                **SHAW AIR FORCE BASE, S.C. (AFNS) --**
                A Shaw Air Force Base **F-16C Fighting Falcon** and civilian aircraft collided July 7 near Joint Base Charleston, South Carolina, at 11:30 a.m.
Maj. Aaron Johnson, the F-16 pilot assigned to the 55th Fighter Squadron, safely ejected and was taken to Joint Base Charleston for a health assessment.
A team of investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board will convene to determine the cause of the crash. There is no further information available at this time.
More information will be released as it becomes available. For further assistance, call (803) 895-1620.*(Updated as of July 8 at 11:20 a.m. EDT.)*Fighting Falcon 



crash 



Shaw AFB 



ACC 



Joint Base Charleston 



f-16
# **Exhibit 32.2**

# ** **

# **CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David E. Ullman, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

 

 
| Date:  September 9, 2004 | /s/ David E. Ullman     |   |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                          | David E. Ullman         |
|                          | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
Exhibit 35.1



|     |                        |                              
|---- | ---------------------- | -----------------------------
|LOGO |                        | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
|     | D1086-120, 12th Floor 
|     | 550 South Tryon Street
|     | Charlotte, NC 28202   
|     | 1-800-326-1334        

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2011, by and among GS Mortgage Securities
Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association , as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator, and
Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series GSMS 2011-GC5 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in
the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage
Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during
such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.



|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/ Daniel Bober        
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
<PAGE>   1


          Exhibit 11 - Statement Re: Computation of Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED      NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                               SEPTEMBER 30,          SEPTEMBER 30,
                                            1996         1997       1996        1997
                                           -------     -------     -------    -------
<S>                                        <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>
Primary:

   Average Shares Outstanding               18,834      22,677      16,930     22,023

   Net Effect of dilutive stock options -
     based on treasury stock method
     using average market price              1,536       1,438       1,428      1,287
                                           -------     -------     -------    -------  

Totals                                      20,370      24,115      18,358     23,310
                                           =======     =======     =======    =======
Net Income                                 $ 1,448     $ 5,213     $ 7,081    $13,939
                                           =======     =======     =======    =======
Earnings Per Share                         $   .07     $   .22     $   .39    $   .60
                                           =======     =======     =======    =======
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 85 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S7120]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              INTRODUCTION OF BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

  The following bills and joint resolutions were introduced, read the 
first and second time by unanimous consent, and referred as indicated:

           By Mr. D'AMATO:
       S. 838. A bill to provide for additional radio broadcasting 
     to Iran by the United States; to the Committee on Foreign 
     Relations.
           By Mr. CHAFEE (for himself, Mr. Graham, and Mr. 
             Conrad):
       S. 839. A bill to amend title XIX of the Social Security 
     Act to permit greater flexibility for States to enroll 
     medicaid beneficiaries in managed care arrangements, to 
     remove barriers preventing the provision of medical 
     assistance under State medicaid plans through managed care, 
     and for other purposes; to the Committee on Finance.
           By Mr. CONRAD:
       S. 840. A bill to provide the States greater flexibility in 
     providing jobs for, and assistance to, needy families, to 
     improve child support enforcement, to reduce teenage 
     pregnancy, and for other purposes; to the Committee on 
     Finance.
     

                          ____________________
```
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**700 KA 10-00604**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
CHARLES BRYANT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (BARBARA J. DAVIES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (J. MICHAEL MARION OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered March 10, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: June 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

                               YELLOW CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

         Yellow Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Company"),
does hereby certify:

         FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Company, at a meeting held
July 17, 2003, unanimously adopted a resolution proposing and declaring
advisable the following amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company:

         Article First of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company shall
be amended to read in its entirety as follows:

         "First:  The name of the Corporation is Yellow Roadway Corporation."

         SECOND: That at a Special Meeting of Stockholders held on December 9,
2003, the holders of a majority of all of the outstanding stock entitled to vote
on such amendment have given their approval to such amendment in accordance with
the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

         THIRD: That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
the applicable provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate to be
signed by Daniel J. Churay, its Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary, this 11th day of December, 2003.

                                      YELLOW CORPORATION


                                      By: /s/ Daniel J. Churay
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Daniel J. Churay
                                          Senior Vice President, General Counsel
                                          and Secretary
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Fred BALLARD.

No. 2011-K-0037.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2011.

In re Ballard, Fred; —Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Avoyelles, 12th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 151888; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-487.

Denied.