alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**Written StatementPursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

** **

The undersigned, John A. Elwood, the ChiefFinancial Officer of Meade Instruments Corp. (the “Company”), pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, hereby certifies that:

 

(i)   the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29,2008 of the Company, as amended by Amendment No. 1, (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)   the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 27, 2009

 
| By:                                                        | /s/  JOHN A. ELWOOD |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
| *Vice  President—Finance and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 1998 (Unaudited) and the Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 1998 (Unaudited)
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,587
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,385
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (840)
<INVENTORY>                                     20,097
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,592
<PP&E>                                          21,587
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,981)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,856
<BONDS>                                          5,637
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,506
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,598
<SALES>                                         35,914
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,497
<CGS>                                           25,909
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 319
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    267
<INCOME-TAX>                                        99
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                168
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       168
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
<FN>
<F1>Provision for doubtful accounts and inventory provision included in total
costs.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### JAMES *v.*JAMES *et al.*

1. Discretion not abused in refusing a continuance.

2. Nonsuit in action of trespass, not erroneous.

No. 6654.

August 16, 1928.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Edwards. Douglas superior court. April 2, 1928.

*J. R. Hutcheson*and *D. K. Johnston,*for plaintiff in error.

*Linton 8. James,*contra.

Gilbert, J.

L. *W.*James filed suit against Joe B. James Jr., and others, alleging that petitioner is the. owner and is in possession of a described lot of land; that the defendants have gone upon said land and committed waste and trespass by cutting and felling timber and hauling same from said land for cross-ties, to the value *787of $150; that said acts are continuous, and are being committed daily without the consent of plaintiff; and that said acts amount to a continuous trespass. The prayers are for injunction to prevent all of the acts complained of, and for process. An abstract of title is attached to the petition, showing grant of the property to William W. Allen, and through subsequent grantees to plaintiff. The defendants answered, denying trespass, and asserting ownership in Joe E. James Jr., attaching an abstract of title from William W. Allen through successive grantees to Joe E. James. They raised the issue of forgery as to portions of the deeds relied oh in plaintiff’s abstract; but as this issue was not mentioned on the trial, it will be considered as abandoned by the defendants. The case having been called for trial, the plaintiff moved for a continuance because of the absence of E. E. Nicholson, a defendant. The plaintiff testified that he expected to prove by Nicholson that the latter was in possession of the land under plaintiff. The motion, in regard to diligence, complied with the statute. The court overruled the motion, and error is assigned upon this ruling. The plaintiff testified in substance that he was the owner of the land, and had been in possession since 1891 under a deed to him from one Bow-den; that his possession consisted of using firewood and donating timber for the- purpose of building a schoolhouse. The deed from Bowden to plaintiff was admitted in evidence without objection. Under an agreement other deeds were admitted in evidence to throw light upon the bona fides of plaintiff’s possession. There was no evidence tending to show any of the acts of trespass alleged, or any damage to plaintiff. The court granted a nonsuit, to which judgment the plaintiff excepted.

1. Under the facts in the record, the judge did not abuse his discretion in overruling the motion to -continue the case.

2. There being a total failure on the part of the plaintiff to prove any of the allegations of the petition in regard to trespass and damage, the court did not err in ordering a nonsuit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### Max Munzesheimer et al. v. W. J. Allen et al.

(No. 1989.)

Error from Bowie County.

Todd & Hudgins, counsel for plaintiff in error.

J. H. Henderson, counsel for defendant in error.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 55. *Notary's certificate of protest; sufficiency of, and effect of as evidence; sufficiency .and effect of, a question of law, and not of fact; case stated.*Munzesheimer *et al.*sued Allen as the maker, and Henry and Tilson as indorsers, upon a promissory note for $300, due sixty days from date. Allen did not answer to the suit. Henry and Tilson answered. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff against Allen alone, and in favor of Henry and Tilson for their costs.

On the trial of the case plaintiffs offered in evidence a notary’s certificate of protest and notice of the non-payment of the note, which were admitted in evidence over defendant’s objection thereto. The principal errors assigned are in relation to the charge of the court. They may be formulated in the statement “that the court erred in submitting questions of law with regard to the legality and sufficiency of-notary’s certificate of protest- and notice to be determined by the jury as questions of fact.” This objection to the charge is well taken. Whether or not the certificate was sufficient was a question of law -for the determination of the court, and not one of fact for the jury. This question the court had decided affirmatively in admitting the certificate in evidence. If it was sufficient the court should have so told *79the jury. If it was sufficient, then, as evidence of the facts therein recited, it fixed the liability of the indorsers, and the verdict was directly against the evidence and should have been set aside. In our opinion the certificate was sufficient under the statute to fix the liability of the indorsers [R. S. art. 274; Payne v. Patrick, 21 Tex. 680], and the verdict and judgment are therefore contrary to the law and the evidence.

October 28, 1885.

Reversed and remanded.

Note. — The note was made payable at the Citizens’ Bank, to the order of the maker, and indorsed by him. The notary’s certificate of protest recited that he had presented the note to the cashier of said bank and demanded payment thereof, which had been refused, whereupon he protested the note against the said maker and indorsers. His certificate of notice recited that he had given due notice to the parties concerned of the demand and protest, to wit, that he had given such notice in writing and print to Allen, the maker, and to Tilson and Henry, the indorsers, all of whom resided in Texarkana, Texas, the place where the note was executed and made payable, and where the same was protested.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                       726
<INVENTORY>                                     18,176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,366
<PP&E>                                         219,049
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,505
<BONDS>                                              0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           23,686
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,661)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,394
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,573
<CGS>                                          116,341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  147,836
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,962
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    775
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                775
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       775
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CURRENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR ACCOMPANYING
NOTES THERETO.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 10(a)
                         Consent of Independent Auditors

<PAGE>

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Auditors"
in the Statement of Additional Information and to the use of our report dated
February 14, 2003, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and
schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company, included in Pre-effective
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-109913) and
related Prospectus of Separate Account VA S.

                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
December 29, 2003
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1134]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

 COMMEMORATION OF THE FIRST AFRICAN-AMERICAN CONGREGATION IN NEW JERSEY

                                 ______

                          HON. DONALD M. PAYNE

                             of new jersey

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, May 25, 1995
  Mr. PAYNE of New Jersey. Mr. Speaker, this weekend a very special 
ceremony will be held in Newark, NJ to commemorate an event of historic 
importance, the founding of the first African-American congregation in 
our State 160 years ago.
  It was on April 27, 1835, that 37 freed slaves and free-born blacks 
left the Old First Presbyterian Church and resolved to become the First 
Colored Presbyterian Church of Newark. In May of that year, the 
Presbytery of Newark acted upon the resolution and they organized into 
a Church with the Reverend John Hunt as their pastor. The Church later 
became the Thirteenth Avenue Presbyterian Church, which merged with 
Clinton Avenue Presbyterian Church in October of 1967.
  The establishment of the Church in 1835 by 37 men and women of 
courage and vision reflected their determination to affirm their own 
culture and identify in their worship.
  Now, 160 years later, the pastor and the congregation continue the 
proud tradition of the founders. In a spirit of love and service, the 
Church continues its commitment to the community.
  This weekend, on Memorial Sunday, a Service of Remembrance and 
Thanksgiving will be held. It will include the lighting of 37 candles 
to honor the founders of the Church; a dramatic presentation by the 
Youth Group; a wreath laying ceremony in honor of loved ones and 
friends of Thirteenth Avenue whose names will be recorded in an Annual 
Memorial Booklet, and the dedication of a Computer Learning Center to 
provide training for the youth of our community as a commitment to the 
future and a renewed affirmation of our self-determination.
  I have asked that during the memorial service a wreath be laid to 
honor Mr. Marcellus Marble, a long-time member of the church. During my 
childhood, Mr. Marble and his wife, Jeanette, showed great kindness in 
including me in special church-related activities. I remember with 
great fondness the yearly church picnic, held at Eagle Rock 
Reservation, where youngsters were able to enjoy games and other 
recreational activities.
  I will always be grateful to Mr. and Mrs. Marble for the guidance 
they gave me during those years and the positive role they played in my 
development.
  I ask my colleagues in the U.S. House of Representatives to join me 
in honoring the pastor of the Clinton Avenue Presbyterian Church, 
Reverend Dr. Alfred B. Johnson and the entire congregation in wishing 
them many more years of success, joy and spiritual growth.

                          ____________________
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 23, 2014.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 23, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0163. NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL, INC. v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF

COMMUNITY HEALTH, et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2014CV248173
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
have issued our reports dated September 13, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual
Report ofForce Protection, Inc.on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Force Protection, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-110341, effective November 7, 2003, File No. 333-82534,
effective February 11, 2002, File No. 333-60603, effective August 4, 1998, File No. 333-137872, effective October 6, 2006, File No. 333-139977, effective
January 12, 2007, and File No. 333-143495, effective June 4, 2007).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP Columbia, SC
September 13, 2008

---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Sontra Medical Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos.333-92414, 333-101517 and 333-106201) and the Registration Statements of Sontra Medical Corporation on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-109716, 333-114484 and 333-36710), of our report dated January 21, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statementsfor the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, which is part of this Form 10-KSB. 

 

/s/ Wolf & Company, P.C. 

 

Wolf & Company, P.C. 

Boston, Massachusetts 

February 16, 2005
581 A.2d 874

#### IN THE MATTER OF GREGORY H. WHEELER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

November 9, 1990.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that GREGORY H. WHEELER of MT. LAUREL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, be temporarily suspended from the practice of law for his failure to comply with a fee arbitration committee determination, and said GREGORY H. WHEELER having been Ordered to Show Cause why he should not be suspended and sanctioned;

And said GREGORY H. WHEELER having represented to the Court on the return date of the Order to Show Cause that he would comply with the fee arbitration award;

And respondent having failed to reimburse his client within the time allotted by the Court, as agreed to by him, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review are adopted and GREGORY H. WHEELER is hereby suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he shall comply with Regulation 23 of the Administrative Guidelines Governing Suspended Attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that any restoration of respondent to the practice of law shall be conditioned on his prior payment of the fee arbitration award in full, including accumulated interest; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in *459the prosecution of this matter, including the recommended sanction of $500.00.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      10,605,068                 780,308
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,295,872                 149,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,450,360                 619,078
<PP&E>                                         403,284               4,218,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,347,051               6,011,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,627,997               5,302,787
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                        216                       0
<COMMON>                                       310,900                 137,837
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,325,631               (219,857)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,347,051               6,011,512
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               755,565                 461,753
<CGS>                                          118,961                  84,920
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,245,407               2,761,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,054                 156,829
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,650,857)             (2,541,475)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.50)                   (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.50)                   (.18)
        

</TABLE>
422 A.2d 1169

#### Commonwealth v. Sawyer, Appellant.

Submitted April 10, 1979.

John H. Pope, for appellant; Robert L. Eberhardt, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

*634Before PRICE, HESTER and MONTGOMERY, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 186 (Monday, September 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 59292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24152]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JOINT BOARD FOR THE ENROLLMENT OF ACTUARIES


 Meeting of the Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Executive Director of the Joint Board for the Enrollment 
of Actuaries gives notice of a closed meeting of the Advisory Committee 
on Actuarial Examinations.

DATES: The meeting will be held on October 22, 2010, from 8:30 a.m. to 
5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Internal Revenue Service, 230 S. 
Dearborn Street, Room 1720, Chicago, IL.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick W. McDonough, Executive 
Director of the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries, 202-622-
8225.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Advisory 
Committee on Actuarial Examinations will meet at Internal Revenue 
Service, 230 S. Dearborn Street, Room 1720, Chicago, IL on Friday, 
October 22, 2010, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to discuss questions that may be 
recommended for inclusion on future Joint Board examinations in 
actuarial mathematics, pension law and methodology referred to in 29 
U.S.C. 1242(a)(1)(B).
    A determination has been made as required by section 10(d) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that the subject of the 
meeting falls within the exception to the open meeting requirement set 
forth in Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and that the public interest 
requires that such meeting be closed to public participation.

    Dated: September 8, 2010.
Patrick W. McDonough,
Executive Director, Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.
[FR Doc. 2010-24152 Filed 9-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P