Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 22, 2010 / Notices 57821 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3This fee is payable for each application to 

establish a new joint account. 

significant increase in the amount of 

any effluent released offsite. There is no 

significant increase in occupational or 

public radiation exposure. Therefore, 

there are no significant radiological 

environmental impacts associated with 

the proposed action. 

With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed 

action does not have any foreseeable 

impacts to land, air, or water resources, 

including impacts to biota. In addition, 

there are also no known socioeconomic 

or environmental justice impacts 

associated with the proposed action. 

Therefore, there are no significant nonradiological environmental impacts 

associated with the proposed action. 

Accordingly, the NRC concludes that 

there are no significant environmental 

impacts associated with the proposed 

action. 

Environmental Impacts of the 

Alternatives to the Proposed Action 

As an alternative to the proposed 

action, the NRC staff considered denial 

of the proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘noaction’’ alternative). Denial of the 

application would result in no change 

in current environmental impacts. 

Therefore, the environmental impacts of 

the proposed action and the alternative 

action are similar. 

Alternative Use of Resources 

The proposed action does not involve 

the use of any different resources than 

those previously considered in the Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement related 

to the CPNPP, Units 3 and 4, COL 

Application dated August 6, 2010. 

Agencies and Persons Consulted 

On August 25, 2010, the NRC staff 

consulted with officials from the Texas 

Department of State Health Services 

(DSHS) regarding the environmental 

impact of the proposed action. The 

representative from the Texas DSHS had 

no comments. 

Finding of No Significant Impact 

On the basis of the environmental 

assessment, the NRC concludes that the 

proposed action will not have a 

significant effect on the quality of the 

human environment. Accordingly, the 

NRC has determined not to prepare an 

environmental impact statement for the 

proposed action. 

For further details with respect to the 

proposed action, see Luminant’s letter 

dated July 28, 2010. Documents may be 

examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the 

NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR), 

located at One White Flint North, Public 

File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike 

(first floor), Rockville, Maryland. 

Publicly available records will be 

accessible electronically from the 

ADAMS Public Electronic Reading 

Room on the Internet at the NRC Web 

site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ 

adams.html. Persons who do not have 

access to ADAMS or who encounter 

problems in accessing the documents 

located in ADAMS should contact the 

NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone 

at 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–4737, or 

via e-mail at pdr.resource@nrc.gov. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day 

of September 2010. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Stephen R. Monarque, 

Project Manager, US–APWR Projects Branch, 

Division of New Reactor Licensing, Office of 

New Reactors. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23680 Filed 9–21–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–62910; File No. SR–C2– 

2010–003] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 

Options Exchange, Incorporated; 

Notice of Filing and Immediate 

Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule 

Change To Adopt Certain ApplicationRelated Fees 

September 14, 2010. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 

‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on 

September 10, 2010, C2 Options 

Exchange, Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ 

or ‘‘C2’’) filed with the Securities and 

Exchange Commission (the 

‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule 

change as described in Items I and II 

below, which Items have been prepared 

by the Exchange. The Commission is 

publishing this notice to solicit 

comments on the proposed rule change 

from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

C2 proposes to adopt application fees. 

The text of the proposed rule change is 

available on the Exchange’s Web site 

(http://www.cboe.org/legal), at the 

Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and 

at the Commission. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

self-regulatory organization included 

statements concerning the purpose of 

and basis for the proposed rule change 

and discussed any comments it received 

on the proposed rule change. The text 

of those statements may be examined at 

the places specified in Item IV below. 

The Exchange has prepared summaries, 

set forth in sections A, B, and C below, 

of the most significant parts of such 

statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and the 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The purpose of the proposed rule 

change is to adopt application-related 

fees for C2 Options Exchange, Inc. C2 

anticipates launching in mid/late 

October, 2010. In connection with the 

commencement of trading on C2, the 

Exchange intends to begin accepting 

applications for C2 trading permits in 

the very near future. As part of the 

application process, C2 intends to 

charge applicant organizations a $4,000 

application fee, and sole-proprietor 

applicants a $2,500 application fee. 

Existing Chicago Board Options 

Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’) permit 

holders applying for C2 trading permits 

will not be charged an application fee 

since nearly all of the necessary 

application processing required by the 

Exchange has already been conducted 

with respect to those CBOE permit 

holders. In fact, existing CBOE permit 

holders, pursuant to C2 Rule 3.1(c)(1) 

are not required to complete and submit 

an Exchange application. C2 notes that 

costs associated with utilizing a C2 

trading permit (e.g. a market-maker 

permit) would apply equally to CBOE 

permit holder [sic] and non-CBOE 

permit holders. 

In connection with the application 

process, certain application-related fees 

that are in place at CBOE will also be 

adopted by C2. Specifically, fees for 

applicants seeking to conduct a public 

customer business ($2,500), fees for 

associated persons ($350), joint account 

applicant fees ($1,000) 3, permit renewal 

fees ($2,000 for organizations and $500 

for sole proprietors), fees associated 

with statutory disqualification and Rule 

19h-1 processing ($2,750 and $1,650 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
57822 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 22, 2010 / Notices 

4The statutory disqualification fee is payable 

whenever a person or entity is subject to a statutory 

disqualification under the Securities Exchange Act 

of 1934 and: (i) Is an applicant for Exchange 

membership, (ii) is seeking to be an associated 

person of an Exchange member (except where the 

Exchange is merely asked to concur in an SEC Rule 

19h–1 filing by another self regulatory 

organization), or (iii) is an existing Exchange 

member or associated person who makes an 

application in accordance with Rule 3.5 or with 

respect to whom a proceeding is initiated pursuant 

to Rule 3.5. This fee is in addition to any other 

membership fees that might be applicable. The Rule 

19h–1 Change in Status Fee is payable whenever a 

person or entity, on whose behalf the Exchange has 

filed a Rule 19h–1 filing that has been approved by 

the SEC, applies for a change in status that requires 

the Exchange to file an amended or additional Rule 

19h–1 filing, if the Exchange approves the 

requested change in status. This fee is in addition 

to any other membership fees that might be 

applicable. 

5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 

6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 

7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 

8 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 

9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

respectively) 4, exam fees ($500), permit 

transfer fees ($500), and fingerprint fees 

($50) are all being adopted. The 

proposed fee levels are comparable to 

those in place at CBOE. For the reasons 

stated above, these fees, with the 

exception of renewal fees (which are 

applicable on subsequent one-year 

anniversaries of C2 ‘‘membership’’), 

statutory disqualification fees, Rule 

19h–1 change in status fees, exam fees, 

permit transfer fees, and fingerprint fees 

will not be charged to CBOE permit 

holders seeking to trade on C2. 

The changes will take effect on 

September 13, 2010. 

2. Statutory Basis 

The proposed rule change is 

consistent with Section 6(b) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’),5 in general, and furthers the 

objectives of Section 6(b)(4) 6 of the Act 

in particular, in that it is designed to 

provide for the equitable allocation of 

reasonable dues, fees, and other charges 

among C2 members and other persons 

using its facilities. C2 notes that 

applicants, depending on whether they 

are organizations or sole-proprietors, 

will all be charged fixed fees which is 

[sic] intended to offset the Exchange’s 

costs of processing the permit holder 

applications and application-related 

matters, and that the proposed fee 

amounts are comparable to those 

charged by CBOE. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

C2 does not believe that the proposed 

rule change will impose any burden on 

competition not necessary or 

appropriate in furtherance of the 

purposes of the Act. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants, or Others 

No written comments were solicited 

or received with respect to the proposed 

rule change. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

The proposed rule change is 

designated by the Exchange as 

establishing or changing a due, fee, or 

other charge, thereby qualifying for 

effectiveness on filing pursuant to 

Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) 7 of the Act and 

subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 8

thereunder. At any time within 60 days 

of the filing of such proposed rule 

change, the Commission summarily may 

temporarily suspend such rule change if 

it appears to the Commission that such 

action is necessary or appropriate in the 

public interest, for the protection of 

investors, or otherwise in furtherance of 

the purposes of the Act. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File 

Number SR–C2–2010–003 on the 

subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, 

Securities and Exchange Commission, 

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–C2–2010–003. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if e-mail is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for website viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., 

Washington, DC 20549, on official 

business days between the hours of 10 

a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also 

will be available for inspection and 

copying at the principal office of the 

Exchange. All comments received will 

be posted without change; the 

Commission does not edit personal 

identifying information from 

submissions. You should submit only 

information that you wish to make 

available publicly. All submissions 

should refer to File Number SR–C2– 

2010–003 and should be submitted on 

or before October 13, 2010. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.9

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23595 Filed 9–21–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–62925; File No. SR– 

NASDAQ–2010–096] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The 

NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order 

Granting Approval to a Proposed Rule 

Change Relating to the National 

Quotation Dissemination Service 

September 16, 2010. 

I. Introduction 

On August 2, 2010, The NASDAQ 

Stock Market LLC (‘‘NASDAQ’’ or 

‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities 

and Exchange Commission (the 

‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section 

19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act 

of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 

thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to 

amend NASDAQ Rule 7017(b) to reestablish retroactively from January 1, 

2008, a pilot program reducing the 

monthly fee that non-professional users 

pay to receive the National Quotation 

Dissemination Service (‘‘NQDS’’) from 

$50 to $10. The proposed rule change 

was published for comment in the 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES