alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification

I, Harry M. Neer, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Rockport Healthcare, Group, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c.   Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: June 30, 2004


/s/ Harry M. Neer
-----------------------------
Harry M. Neer, Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
580 A.2d 271

#### IN THE MATTER OF LEONARD M. ATLAS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 15, 1990.

ORDER

LEONARD M. ATLAS, of MORGANVILLE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1965, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LEONARD M. ATLAS, is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.
News United States Air Force
 New Airman Magazine edition out nowPublished Oct. 31, 2014
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                The November issue of *Airman* magazine is now available to download and viewable through a Web browser.
Our cover story, titled “Making Airmen,” tells the story of how Tech. Sgt. Chananya Stuart, a native of the Virgin Islands, grooms trainees into Air Force warriors within eight short weeks. The print and photo story take you behind the scenes of what goes into making an Airman. 
Also featured in this issue is the transformation that takes place in high school-aged teenagers when they take part in a one-week glider academy with the Civil Air Patrol. Arriving with little to no flight instruction, these young cadets successfully pilot a glider aircraft within one week of arriving.
Lastly featured is the journey of Tech. Sgt. Todd Houghton to become the Air Force’s first champion in the service's inaugural High Flying BBQ Challenge. For this aircraft structural mechanic, there is no finer taste than that of success.  
Read more stories from “Around the Air Force,” and download *Airman* magazine’s November issue for your tablet here:**Apple:** bit.ly/1pHg3SY**Android:** bit.ly/1jJehsG**Kindle:** amzn.to/1m644uf*Airman* magazine provides an interactive experience for tablet readers, and a limited interactive version is viewable in Web browser format here:**Click here to read the November tablet edition of *Airman* magazine on your PC/Mac.**
 
For more stories, visit *Airman* Online, the website for the official magazine of the United States Air Force.Ebola 



training 



feature stories 



Airman magazine
<PAGE> 1

<TABLE>
                                                                                                  Exhibit 11

                                         ENGINEERED SUPPORT SYSTEMS, INC.
                                STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<CAPTION>
                                                      Three Months Ended                 Nine Months Ended
                                                            July 31                           July 31
                                                  -------------------------        --------------------------
                                                     1998           1997              1998            1997
                                                  ----------     ----------        ----------      ----------
<S>                                               <C>            <C>               <C>             <C>
NET INCOME                                        $1,446,992     $1,297,657        $3,690,232      $3,198,793
                                                  ==========     ==========        ==========      ==========

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE

    Average shares outstanding                     4,790,372      4,726,484         4,766,985       4,755,138
                                                  ==========     ==========        ==========      ==========

                                                        $.30           $.27              $.77            $.67
                                                  ==========     ==========        ==========      ==========


DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

    Average shares outstanding                     4,790,372      4,726,484         4,766,985       4,755,138

    Net effect of dilutive stock options<F1>         228,888        203,374           218,921         189,929
                                                  ----------     ----------        ----------      ----------
                                                   5,019,260      4,929,858         4,985,906       4,945,067
                                                  ==========     ==========        ==========      ==========
                                                        $.29           $.26              $.74            $.65
                                                  ==========     ==========        ==========      ==========

<FN>
<F1> Based on the treasury stock method.
</TABLE>

                                    14
EXHIBIT 99.1
 
 OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE





This Officer’s Certificate is furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2011, among BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as Seller, Servicer, Administrator and Custodian, Citibank, NA, as Indenture Trustee, BMW FS Securities LLC, as Depositor, and the BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2011-A, as Issuer (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) (all capitalized terms used herein without definition have the respective meanings specified in the Sale and Servicing Agreement).




THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT:
 
 1.           I am a duly authorized officer of the Servicer;
 
 2.           I have reviewed the terms of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and I have made, or have caused to be made under my supervision, a detailed review of the transactions and conditions of the Servicer and the performance of its obligations there under during the period from August 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011;
 
 3.           To my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, during the period from August 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011, except as set forth below.


Described below are the exceptions, if any, to paragraph 3 by listing, in detail, the nature of the condition or event, the period during which it has existed and the action which the Servicer has taken, is taking, or proposes to take with respect to each such condition or event:  NONE




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereunto set my hand this 28th day of March, 2012.
 
 By:          BMW Financial Services NA, LLC
 
 By:         /s/ Joachim Hensel
 Name:    Joachim Hensel
 Title:      Chief Financial Officer
#### S. A. & A. P. R’y Co. v. Joaquin Leal.

(No. 6739.)

Appeal from Wilson County.

Proctor & Proctor, counsel for appellant.

A. R. Stevenson and A. J. Williams, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 149. *Railroad companies; killing stock; sufficiency of evidence.*Appellee recovered judgment against appellant for $150, the value of a jack alleged to have been killed by appellant’s train. We think the evidence does not warrant the judgment. It was proved by one witness that he found the jack about thirty feet from appellant’s railway track bruised on its rump and hind parts. These injuries were fresh. Two days prior to finding the jack injured the witness had seen him and he was in good condition. The jack died from his injuries. This is all the evidence relating to the injury of the jack. No one saw the train strike the jack. No circumstances except those above recited were proved tending to show that the injuries were caused by a train. It was not shown that the injuries might not have been inflicted in *214other ways than by contact with a train. It is hardly probable that the injury was caused by a train, without leaving upon or near the railway track some indication of the contact, but the record is silent as to any such indication.

June 25, 1890.

Reversed and remanded.
#### Oscar BERTHELOT v. Secretary Richard STALDER, State of Louisiana, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Warden James Miller, and Warden Burl Cain.

No. 2011-CC-0576.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2011.

In re Cain, Warden Burl; Department of Public Safety and Corrections; Miller, Warden James; Stalder, Secretary Richard et ah; State of Louisiana; —Defendants); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial DistrictCourt Div. 0, No. 458,174; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CW 1985.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5591]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from New York [Mr. Owens] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. OWENS addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
#### COLUMBUS HEATING & VENTILATING CO. *v.*BURT.

Jurisdiction of writ of error in trover suit for personal property is in Court of Appeals, not Supreme Court.

Courts, 15 C. J. p. 1039, n. 52.

Fixtures, 26 C. J. p. 677, n. 28.

No. 6339.

March 14, 1928.

Certiorari. Before Judge Howard. Fulton superior court. October 26, 1927.

*Charles G. Bruce,*for plaintiff. *II. II. Turner,*for defendant,

Gilbert, J.

This is a suit in trover to recover a furnace sold by plaintiff to defendant under a written contract which contained the following: “It is further agreed that the furnace and all materials shall remain our personal property until the whole sum of $185 has been fully paid, or in case we shall accept as payment or part payment for said warm-air apparatus materials any note or notes, until any or all such note or notes and every renewal or renewals thereof shall be fully paid; and you further agree that if you do not pay for said heating apparatus as above specified, you will allow heating contractor to enter your premises unmolested and remove said heating apparatus together with all materials belonging thereto.” The ease originated in the municipal court of Atlanta, was carried to the superior court of Fulton County by certiorari, and comes to this court upon exceptions to the judgment rendered by the superior court.

1. The intention of the parties is shown by the contract, which is unambiguous. According to the contract the furnace, though *159attached to the realty, remained personal property. *Smith v. Odom,*63 *Ga.*499; *Power*v. *Garrison,*141 *Ga.*429 (81 S. E. 225); *Armour*v. *Block,*147 *Ga.*639 (95 S. E. 228), and cit.

2. The suit being in trover, and containing no question coming under the jurisdiction of this court, the case must be transferred to the Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction.

*Transferred to the Court of Appeals.*

*All the Justices concur.*
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1199 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To extend the grant program for drug-endangered children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

HR 1199 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drug Endangered 

3 Children Act of 2007’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DRUG-ENDANGERED CHILDREN GRANT PROGRAM 

5 EXTENDED. 

6 Section 755(c) of the USA PATRIOT Improvement 

7 and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 3797cc–2(c)) 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2006 and 2007’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2008 and 2009’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
583 A.2d 344

#### KELLY ANN APGAR v. LEDERLE LABORATORIES, ETC.

March 20, 1990.

Leave to appeal granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1365 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1365

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the alternative 
                      minimum tax on corporations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2007

Mr. English of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
Sessions, Mr. Davis of Kentucky, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Gary G. Miller 
  of California, Mr. Jordan of Ohio, Mr. Simpson, Mrs. Musgrave, Mr. 
 Conaway, and Mr. Doolittle) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the alternative 
                      minimum tax on corporations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Corporate AMT Repeal''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX ON CORPORATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 55 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to alternative minimum tax imposed) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new flush sentence:
``Except in the case of a corporation, no tax shall be imposed by this 
section for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2006, and the 
tentative minimum tax for any such taxable year of any taxpayer which 
is a corporation shall be zero for purposes of this title.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          54,456
<SECURITIES>                                    21,341
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,841
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,907
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               200,381
<PP&E>                                          38,412
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,108
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 288,556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          111,070
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       177,805
<OTHER-SE>                                    (89,826)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   288,556
<SALES>                                        224,038
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               224,238
<CGS>                                          102,968
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  102,968
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               187,078
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (65,159)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,490
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (90,330)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (90,330)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.71)
        


</TABLE>
Sonic Jet Performance, Inc.
                          11782 Western Avenue- Unit B
                               Stanton, CA, 90680


                                  April 1, 2003


 Dear  Walter:

          This letter confirms that we have offered you employment for one year
 on the following terms, to begin April 1, 2003:

1.   You position will be Investor Relations Coordinator, reporting directly to
     the President.  All decisions that have material effect the business must
     be authorized by the President.

2.   Your salary will be $60,000 annually, paid biweekly. On occasion, you may
     have the opportunity to earn commissions and finders fees for fundraising
     and other efforts. These situations will be determined and documented on a
     case by case basis.

3.   You shall be reimbursed for reasonable and necessary business expenses
     authorized and verified to Company's satisfaction.

4.   This agreement will terminate on April 1, 2004. Following it's termination,
     the Company may terminate this agreement at any time for any reason with or
     without cause. No one has the authority to change this except by a written
     agreement signed by both parties. 30 days notice would be expected from you
     and would be given to you (or pay in lieu of notice) absent unusual
     circumstances.

5.   We each mutually agree to arbitrate any and all differences, claims, or
     disputes, of every kind (statutory or other) arising out of your employment
     or its termination. Such arbitration would be in Orange County, California,
     or other mutually-agreed location, before the American Arbitration
     Association, and in lieu of any court action.

     No other promises or representations have been made to you.

     Please sign below and return the original to me to accept employment.

                                                    Very truly yours,


                                                    Madhava Rao Mankal
                                                    CFO Sonic Jet Performance

        Agreed to this 1st day of April, 2003


        -----------------------------
        Walter Wright
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5173]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

REPORT ON RESOLUTION WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST CONFERENCE REPORT 
   ON H.R. 1158, EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR DISASTER 
              ASSISTANCE AND RESCISSIONS, FISCAL YEAR 1995

  Mr. SOLOMON, from the Committee on Rules, submitted a privileged 
report (Rept. No. 104-126) on the resolution (H. Res. 151) waiving 
points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill 
(H.R. 1158) making emergency supplemental appropriations for additional 
disaster assistance and making rescissions for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1995, and for other purposes, which was referred to the 
House Calendar and ordered to be printed.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 99.02**

 

**Certification of Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350**

**(Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, Beth Marie Buck, CPA, VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of RWDTechnologies, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that to the best of myknowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the periodended December 31, 2002 of the Registrant (the “Report”):

 

(1)       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| /s/  Beth Marie Buck, CPA                                    |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Beth Marie  Buck, CPA  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| March 31,  2003                                                   |

 

----