alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# National Hispanic-Serving Institutions Week, 2010 

Education is critical to our children’s future and to the continued growth and prosperity of our Nation.  To maintain our leadership in the global economy, we have an obligation to provide a high-quality education to our children and ensure they can obtain higher education and job training.  Currently, Hispanics are the largest and fastest growing minority group in our Nation, and they have been a vital force of innovation and development.  As we look to deliver a world-class education that will determine America’s success in the 21st century, we must ensure Hispanics have access to the resources and tools needed to compete and thrive.

Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) are key members of our higher education system and vital sources of strength for our Nation’s students.  They play an important role in attracting underrepresented Americans to science, technology, engineering, and math—fields that will be pivotal in the 21st-century economy.  HSIs are committed to improving the lives of their students as well as helping revitalize the communities where they serve.  Graduates of these institutions are helping expand our economy and enriching all aspects of our national life.

To prepare the next generation of great American leaders, my Administration has set a goal to have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world by 2020.  Enhancing educational opportunities for Hispanics will be vital to achieving this objective, and we will need the continued leadership of our HSIs to increase the enrollment, retention, and graduation rates of our Hispanic students.  Working together, we will open doors of opportunity for all our children and help them succeed on a global stage.

This week, we celebrate the contributions of the more than 200 Hispanic-Serving Institutions in communities across our country, and we recognize the students, alumni, parents, teachers, and school leaders whose vision and dedication has brightened countless futures.  We will need their dreams and hard work, ideas and talents, perseverance and daring in the days ahead to build a stronger, more prosperous tomorrow for our Nation.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 19 through September 25, 2010, as National Hispanic-Serving Institutions Week.  I call upon all public officials, educators, and people of the United States to observe this week with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities that acknowledge the contributions these institutions and their graduates have made to our country.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this seventeenth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth.

[FR Doc. 2010-24098

Billing code 3195-W0-P
#### John Hahn v. Cook & Culmore.

(No. 378, Tex. L. J., vol. *1,*p. 299.)

Appeal from Harris County.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 689. *Set-off of debt of one partner against a partnership debt.*. Cook & Culmore, as partners at law, sued Hahn on an account for $286.57 for professional services. Hahn pleaded in set-off and reconvention an account for $289.30 against Culmore, one of the partners, alleging the insolvency of Culmore, and asked that his account in set-off and reconvention be allqwed to the extent of Oulmore’s interest in plaintiffs’ demand against him. Defendant testified that Culmore was insolvent. Culmore testified that he was solvent. After the evidence was concluded, plaintiffs moved the court to exclude from the jury the testimony with reference to defendant’s set-off, and the court sustained the motion. The general rule is that set-offs must be mutual, and in the same right with the debts sued for, and that a joint debt cannot therefore be set off against a separate demand, nor a separate against a joint one. [Allbright v. Aldrich, 2 Tex. 166.] In this case, if the firm of plaintiffs are solvent, and Culmore, one of the firm, is insolvent, it would be inequitable to permit the plaintiffs to recover a judgment for the entire amount of their claim, leaving the defendant, who holds a just claim, if his testimony is true, for which one of the plaintiffs is liable, without any remedy to enforce its payment, after the showing made to prove his insolvency; and for this reason we think the plaintiffs’ motion should not have been granted. We believe it permissible for the courts in this state to entertain afiy matters of defense, either equita*379ble or legal, which go to defeat the plaintiff’s action either in whole or in part. And when equitable matters of defense are presented, if they do not go to defeat the whole case, the courts will reserve to themselves the right to consider them or not, according to the circumstances of the particular case. In every case where a party relies on the insolvency of the party or parties against w’hom he holds the demand pleaded in set-off, to take it out of the general rule, the burden is on the party who pleads the set-off to show the insolvency. [Hanchett v. Gray, 7 Tex. 549; Henderson v. Gilliam & Co. 12 Tex. 71; Hamilton v. Van Hook, 26 Tex. 302. Judge Ector reviews these cases and distinguishes them from the case at bar, and concludes by saying: “Under our liberal system of practice, we think the courts should dispose of and adjudicate all matters in controversy between the parties, when it can be done, and thereby avoid a multiplicity of suits. The law should not permit Cook & Culmore to collect whatever demands might be due from Hahn to them, and at the same time refuse to permit Hahn to set off so much of their joint demand as would be equal to Culmore’s share of the joint demand against him, the insolvency of said firm not being alleged by plaintiffs, and the record being silent as to any creditor of the firm interposing objection to such disposition of any part of the partnership debts of Oook & Culmore.”

March 16, 1878.

Reversed and remanded.
2013 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-15-2013

Fred Clayworth v. County of Luzerne

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 11-4593

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2013

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2013 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Fred Clayworth v. County of Luzerne" (2013). 2013 Decisions. Paper 842.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2013/842
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 11-4593

___________

FRED CLAYWORTH, individually and as parent 

and natural guardian of G.H.,

Appellant

v.

LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA; LUZERNE COUNTY 

CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES; FRANK CASTANO; JOSEPH KLOSS; 

JOHN KOSLOSKI; TARA MCCUTCHEON; WILMA SNOPEK; 

JOANNE VAN SAUN

Before: FUENTES, HARDIMAN and ROTH, Circuit Judges

 

O R D E R

The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant having been submitted to the judges 

who participated in the decision of this court, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for 

panel rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion and judgment filed February 5, 2013 is 

hereby VACATED, and a new opinion and judgment will issue forthwith. 

 

 By the Court,

 /s/ JANE R. ROTH 

 Circuit Judge

 

Dated: May 15, 2013

Tnh/cc: All Counsel of Record
No. 87-6551.

#### Olsowy *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Government Accountability Office

# AGENCY:

Government Accountability Office (GAO).

# ACTION:

Notice on letters of nomination.

# SUMMARY:

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act gave the Comptroller General of the United States responsibility for appointing not more than 15 members to a Methodology Committee of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. In addition, the Directors of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Institutes of Health, or their designees, are members of the Methodology Committee. Methodology Committee members must meet the qualifications listed in Section 6301 of the Act. For these appointments, I am announcing the following: Letters of nomination and resumes should be submitted by October 29, 2010 to ensure adequate opportunity for review and consideration of nominees prior to appointment. If an individual has previously submitted a letter of nomination and resume to be considered for appointment to the PCORI Board of Governors and would also like to be considered for nomination to the PCORI Methodology Committee, please so indicate by e-mail or mail as noted below, however you do not need to submit another resume. Letters of nomination, nominee contact information and resumes can be forwarded to either the e-mail or mailing address listed below.

# ADDRESSES:

Nominations can be submitted by either of the following:

*E-mail: PCORIMethodology@gao.gov*                         (in the subject line, please write “NOMINEE'S LAST NAME, Methodology Committee”). If submitted via e-mail, please do not mail a hard copy.                    

*Mail:*                         GAO Health Care, Attention: PCOR Institute Methodology Committee, 441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20548.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*GAO:*                         Office of Public Affairs, (202) 512-4800.                    

[Sec. 6301, Pub. L. 111-1481].

Gene L. Dodaro,

Acting Comptroller General of the United States.

[FR Doc. 2010-24143 Filed 9-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND AS OF
JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                  0000919601
<NAME> VENDALUX CORP
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,293
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,274
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,388)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  15
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (15)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (15)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10(b)


Consent of Independent Accountants  


        We hereby consent to the use, in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-81553) of our report dated March 19, 2003, relating to
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Protective Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the use
in this Registration Statement of our report dated March 17, 2003, on our audits of the financial statements of The Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement. 


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Birmingham,
Alabama

December 30, 2003
(Senior Care Florida Master Lease and Subleases)
 st Execution Date Lessee Sublessee Sublessees OHI Emerald Lessor Emerald Lessors Omega
  Florida
Facilities Existing Lease Subleases
  Schedule 1 Existing Lease Security Document Existing Lease Security Documents
 Replacement Lease Replacement Lease Security Documents Schedule 2 Omega Foreclosure




---



##### 



Schedule 3
      Effective Date
 Termination of Existing Lease and Subleases Indemnity
Survival Period Schedule 1 Surviving Guaranty
 2




---



##### 



Bill of Sale
 Termination of Replacement Lease Schedule 2
 Termination of Working Capital Loan Security Documents Schedule 3
 Release of Liens Schedule 4 Schedule
4
 Pro-rations
 Amendment; Waiver
 Captions
 Assigns
 Counterparts
 3




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Costs and Attorneys Fees
 Construction
 Signatures on following pages.
 4




---



##### 



Signature Page to   (Senior Care Master Lease and Subleases)
 
 By:

/s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    EVP & CFO Signature Page 1 of 3




---



##### 



Signature Page to   (Senior Care Master Lease and Subleases)
 OHI ASSET II (FL), LLCBy:
    Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.,its sole memberBy:
    /s/ Daniel J. BoothName:
    Daniel J. BoothTitle:
    Chief Operating OfficerFLORIDA LESSOR-EMERALD, INC.By:
    /s/ Daniel J. BoothName:
    Daniel J. BoothTitle:
    Chief Operating OfficerOMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC.By:
    /s/ Daniel J. BoothName:
    Daniel J. BoothTitle:
    Chief Operating Officer Signature Page 2 of 3




---



##### 



Signature Page to   (Senior Care Master Lease and Subleases)
   ADVOCAT, INC. a Delaware corporationBy:
    /s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    EVP & CFODIVERSICARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES CO., a Tennessee
corporationBy:
    /s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    EVP & CFOADVOCAT FINANCE INC., a Delaware corporationBy:
    /s/ Glynn RiddleName:
    Glynn RiddleTitle:
    EVP & CFO Signature Page 3 of 3
#### Jimmy L. SMITH v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-C-1140.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 2011.

In re State of Louisiana; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of West Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 09-WCR-54; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. 2009 CA 1765, 2009 CW 1169.

Granted.
090422-F-JZ031-393.JPG
            MICHAEL K. GALLOGLYMr. Michael K. Gallogly, a Defense Intelligence Senior Level executive, is the Senior Technical Adviser for the Office of Security, Counterintelligence and Special Program Oversight, Office of the Administrative Assistant, Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, Washington, D.C. He is responsible for program management and national security policy guidance at the Air Staff-level for all multi-agency programs, which includes ensuring the security of various research projects with significant potential impact on the defense capabilities of this country. Additionally, he provides a management interface between the Department of Defense and the intelligence community. Mr. Gallogly is also a panel chair for the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records. 
Mr. Gallogly retired in 1999 after 21 years as an active-duty Air Force security forces officer, serving as a commander, operations officer and staff officer. He has held a variety of assignments with the National Reconnaissance Office and the Security Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Office. He also served as Director of Security for the Discover II Satellite Joint Program Office, Washington, D.C. Prior to his current assignment, he was Director of Operations for Security, Counterintelligence and Special Program Oversight. **EDUCATION**1978 Bachelor of Arts degree in criminal justice, University of Georgia 
1985 Master of Science degree in acquisition and procurement management, Webster University 
1997 Program for Senior Executives in National and International Security, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.**CAREER CHRONOLOGY**1. 1991 - 1997, Director, Program Security, and Deputy Director, Security Space Systems, National Reconnaissance Office, Washington, D.C. (1994 - 1996, Director, Security, Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Office, Washington, D.C.; 1996 - 1997, Director, Operations Support, Data Fusion Facility, NRO, Chantilly, Va.) 
2. 1997 - 1999, Director, Security, Discover II Satellite Joint Program Office, Washington, D.C. 
3. 1999 - 2008, Deputy Director, later, Director of Operations, Security, Counterintelligence and, and Special Program Oversight, Office of the Administrative Assistant, Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, Washington, D.C. 
4. 2008 - present, Senior Technical Adviser, Security, Counterintelligence and Special Program Oversight, Office of the Administrative Assistant, Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, Washington, D.C. 
(Current as of April 2009)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets and the Statements of Consolidated Operations and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,544
<SECURITIES>                                        16
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                       263
<INVENTORY>                                     17,413
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,973
<PP&E>                                          17,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     202,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   230,826
<SALES>                                         34,247
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,247
<CGS>                                           27,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,824
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,439)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,138)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,067)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,071)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,071)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 23.1



                 CONSENT OF LARRY E. NUNN & ASSOCIATES, LLC

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (registration number 333-53863), and in the related
Prospectus, of Unified Financial Services, Inc. of our report dated February
1, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the
Company as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and for the years ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.


/s/ Larry E. Nunn & Associates, L.L.C.
Columbus, Indiana
March 29, 2001
News United States Air Force
 45th SW supports NASA’s successful launchPublished Sept. 9, 2016
                        
                        By 45th Space Wing Public Affairs
                **CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                The 45th Space Wing supported NASA’s successful launch of the Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, Security-Regolith Explorer (OSIRIS-Ex) spacecraft aboard a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket from Space Launch Complex 41 here Sept. 8.The ULA Atlas V rocket is carrying NASA’s OSIRIS-REx on the first U.S. mission that will travel to near-Earth asteroid Bennu to collect surface samples. As planned, the spacecraft will reach its asteroid target in 2018 and return a sample to Earth in 2023, according to NASA.“Congratulations to ULA, NASA and the entire integrated team who ensured the success of this launch,” said Col. Walt Jackim, the 45th SW vice commander and mission launch decision authority. “We truly have a tremendous space team supporting this historic mission -- the first since the Apollo program where we will bring a sample back from space. It’s my honor to be a part of this mission supporting the space industry. Assured access to space is a team sport and here on the Eastern Range, we continue to prove we are the ‘world’s premier gateway to space.’”Florida 



space 



Atlas V 



OSIRIS-Rex 



launch 



NASA 



Cape Canaveral AFS