alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
List of Subsidiaries:


Our wholly owned subsidiaries include:

o    Nanning Sonic Jet Ltd.: A venture  organized under the People's Republic of
     China, which does business under the names Nanning Sonic Jet, LLC.

o    Sonic  Jet  Performance,   Inc.  incorporated  in  Florida,  as  Florida
     Corporation has not conducted business since September 1999.

o    Dalian Sonic Jet Co., Ltd., a venture organized under the People's Republic
     of China is a venture that we own 45% of the equity.  Since July 2000,  the
     Dalian venture has not conducted business.
Exhibit
10.2


 


Voting
Agreement Amendment


 


This Agreement dated December 10, 2003
amends the Voting Agreement dated December 26, 2002 (the “Voting
Agreement”) between Chase Corporation (the “Company”) and the Trustees of the
Edward L. Chase Revocable Trust (the “Trust”). For good and valuable
consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the
Trust hereby amend the Voting Agreement as follows:


 


1. The first three lines of Section 1 are hereby amended to read
as follows:


 


“For a period of ten (10) years commencing on
January 28, 2003, or on any other date in 2003 upon which the Company’s
Annual meeting is held and ending on January 28, 2013, or any other date
in 2013...”


 


2. Section 2(a) is deleted in its entirety.


 


3. Section 2(d) is amended to read as follows: “Andrew Chase is
Nominated by the Nominating Committee for a directorship on the 2004 through
2012 BOD of the Company.”


 


4.  Section 2(e) is amended
to read as follows: “Andrew Chase is elected to the position of director at each
of the Company’s annual shareholders meetings in 2004 through 2012.


 


5.               Section 2(g)
is deleted.


 


6.  Section 3 is amended by
adding a new clause (v) as follows: “(v) Andrew Chase for any reason informs
the Trust that he no longer desires to serve as a member of the Board of
Directors.”


 


7. Section 4 is amended by inserting the following at the
beginning of such section: “Except in the case where the Trust shall have
designated a person other than Andrew Chase to serve as its representative on
the BOD,...”


 


This Agreement shall take effect as an
instrument under seal and shall be governed by the substantive laws of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts.


 


In witness whereof, the parties have executed this instrument as of the
date first written above.


 


 


	
   

  	
  Edward L. Chase Revocable Trust

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Sarah Chase

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Chase Corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Everett Chadwick

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title: Vice President – Finance, CFO
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5556]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Kingston] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. KINGSTON addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Each of the
undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Petro Stopping Centers, L.P.
(the Company), that to his knowledge:



(1) The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This written statement is being furnished to the SEC as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                       |  |                                                 
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 4, 2004 |  | /s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.                          
|                       |  | (J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)                            
|                       |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President
|                       | 
|Date: November 4, 2004 |  | /s/ Edward Escudero                             
|                       |  | (Edward Escudero)                               
|                       |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **2 -**  **6301**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
ANTONIO BRANCH , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News
. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 4:01

- cr - 00061

- HCM

- 1 )

Submitted : May 31, 2012 Decided: August 2, 2012

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Antonio Branch, Appellant Pro Se . Robert E dward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antonio Branch appeals the district court ’ s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction in
sentence . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Branch , No. 4:01

- cr - 0006 1

- HCM

1 (E.D. Va., Jan. 31, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE ex rel. Terrence K. BENOIT v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-2539.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 2011.

In re Benoit, Terrence K.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Iberia, 16th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. CR-04-1005; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-01037 KH.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION
  Dated: February 23, 2011
    
    /s/ Bruce W. Duncan

Bruce W. Duncan 
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) 
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.Dated: February 23, 2011
    
    /s/ Scott A. MusilScott A. Musil 
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. The information contained in this written statement shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference to such filing.
News United States Air Force
 EOD immersion serves as eye-openerPublished July 14, 2016
                        
                        By  Airman Nathan H. Barbour
                        
                        
                        355th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. (AFNS)  --**
                *(This feature is part of the "Through Airmen's Eyes" series. These stories focus on individual Airmen, highlighting their Air Force story.)*
Leaving a career field can be a scary proposition for an Airman who has been performing and learning the ins and outs of their job for the better part of a decade. The new career they choose may or may not be a good fit.
Despite that, Staff Sgt. Michael McNally, a 355th Maintenance Group scheduler, recently became eligible to retrain into another career field, so he decided to change directions.
“I’ve filled mainly a support role for eight years now and it’s time to get my hands dirty,” McNally said.
McNally applied for retraining and qualified for his first choice -- explosive ordnance disposal technician.
For Airmen who volunteer to retrain into the EOD career field, a 10-day orientation is required with their local Air Force EOD flight. This immersion serves a dual purpose: showing Airmen exactly what EOD technicians do on a regular basis and determining if a candidate is right for the job.
“I’ve been learning all about ordnance and the different types of bombs and projectiles,” McNally said. “It’s a lot of information to take in.”
EOD technicians must be able to perform intricate procedures under high-stress conditions in all kinds of environments.
“We’re always looking for good candidates for the program because it takes a special person to volunteer for this type of duty,” said Senior Master Sgt. Edward Lockhart, the 355th Civil Engineer Squadron EOD flight superintendent.
EOD is considered one of the most dangerous career fields in the Air Force.
“I make sure they appreciate what our job fully entails and then let them know, honestly, what risk is involved,” Lockhart said. “I have faced tragedy (in this career field); however, the good we do outweighs those negative experiences.”
The career field may attract Airmen because of how the risks involved encourage strong bonds between wingmen.
“My week here has been a big eye-opener to see what else is out there in the Air Force,” McNally said.EOD 



training 



Davis-Monthan AFB 



retrain 



ACC 



TAE Related Links
        EOD Immersion
                                
                                One Airman on D-M goes through a 10 day trial to see if EOD is the new career he wants to embark on.
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOSE RAMOS

(AC 23327)

Foti, Bishop and Hennessy, Js.

Argued April 28

officially released May 20, 2003

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
[No. 43804-2-I.

Division One.

April 10, 2000.]

#### West Coast, Inc., *Appellant,*v. Snohomish County, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-2-06230-4, Robert S. Lasnik, J., entered November 17, 1998. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Grosse, J., concurred in by Baker and Ellington, JJ. Ordered published December 26, 2000.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CKE
RESTAURANTS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME AS OF AND FOR THE 40-WEEKS ENDED NOVEMBER 1, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
NOVEMBER 1, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1999
<CASH>                                          40,450
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,235
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,937
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,900
<PP&E>                                       1,381,925
<DEPRECIATION>                                 313,217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,641,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          193,991
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           521
<OTHER-SE>                                     614,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,641,458
<SALES>                                      1,385,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,514,605
<CGS>                                        1,131,517
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,416,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,910
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,247
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,812
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,435
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    290
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,725
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62


</TABLE>
582 A.2d 1265

#### IN THE MATTER OF JOEL M. ALBERT, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

December 24, 1990.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that the petition for reinstatement is granted.
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 24.01
                             RWD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

          Know all men by these presents, that the undersigned directors and
officers of RWD Technologies, Inc., a Maryland corporation, constitute, and
appoint Dr. Robert W. Deutsch, John H. Beakes, and Ronald E. Holtz (with full
power to each of them to act alone) as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and
agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead
in any and all capacities to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K and any or all
amendments thereto and to file the same with all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their or his
substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, thereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
         SIGNATURE                          TITLE                      DATE
---------------------------  ------------------------------------  -------------
<S>                          <C>                                   <C>

/s/ Robert W. Deutsch        Chairman of the Board, Chief          March 6, 1998
---------------------------  Executive Officer, and Director
Robert W. Deutsch, Ph.D.

/s/ John H. Beakes           President, Chief Operating Officer,   March 6, 1998
---------------------------  and Director
John H. Beakes

/s/ Ronald E. Holtz          Vice President, Chief Financial       March 6, 1998
---------------------------  Officer, and Director
Ronald E. Holtz

/s/ John E. Lapolla          Group Vice President and Director     March 6, 1998
---------------------------
John E. Lapolla

/s/ Kenneth J. Rebeck        Group Vice President and Director     March 6, 1998
---------------------------
Kenneth J. Rebeck

/s/ Jeffrey W. Wendel        Group Vice President and Director     March 6, 1998
---------------------------
Jeffrey W. Wendel

/s/ Robert T. O'Connell      Senior Vice President - Strategic     March 6, 1998
---------------------------  Business Planning and Director
Robert T. O'Connell

/s/ David J. Deutsch         Director                              March 6, 1998
---------------------------
David J. Deutsch, Ph.D.

/s/ Jerry P. Malec           Director                              March 6, 1998
---------------------------
Jerry P. Malec

/s/ Bruce D. Alexander       Director                              March 6, 1998
---------------------------
Bruce D. Alexander
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 89 (Friday, May 26, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S7611]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

       RICHARD P. BUCKLEY--OUTSTANDING EDUCATOR FROM BROCKTON, MA

  Mr. KENNEDY. Mr. President, it is a privilege to take this 
opportunity to pay tribute to Richard P. Buckley of Brockton, MA, for 
his 35 years of outstanding service to education in Massachusetts.
  Richard Buckley is retiring this year as title I coordinator in the 
Brockton Public Schools, a position he has held with great distinction 
since 1969. The Federal title I program that he administers provides 
vital support for improving the reading and mathematics skills of 
Brockton's disadvantaged students. He has also taught at the 
elementary, junior high, and high school levels, and as served as an 
elementary school assistant principal.
  In addition to his duties in Brockton, Richard Buckley is also a 
member of the Massachusetts Chapter 1 Director's Advisory Council and 
the Massachusetts Department of Education Committee of Practitioners. 
He is an executive board member and two-time past president of the 
Council of Administrators of Compensatory Education.
  Richard Buckley also served in the U.S. Army for many years. A 
graduate of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff School, he was 
Commander of the Boston Army Reserve Center and is now a retired 
colonel of the Army Reserve.
  Throughout this extraordinary career, Richard Buckley has been a 
strong leader for high quality education for the students of Brockton. 
On the occasion of his retirement, I commend him for his remarkable 
service to his community and our country.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-57992), Form S-8 (File No. 333-100630) and
Form S-4 (File No. 333-63052) of First Industrial, L.P. of our report dated
March 9, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial statements and of our
report dated March 9, 2004 relating to the combined financial statements of the
Other Real Estate Partnerships, which appears in this Annual Report on Form
10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
March 9, 2004 relating to the financial statement schedule of First Industrial,
L.P., which appears in this Form 10-K.

                                                      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 15, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          30,706
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,517
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,223
<PP&E>                                       2,899,619
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,973,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,550
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,958,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,973,133
<SALES>                                         90,359
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                95,989
<CGS>                                           67,118
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  124,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,154)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,154)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 87-1220.

#### Rockland Industries, Inc. *v.*Chumbley et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.1



Certifications



I, J.A. Cardwell, Sr., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Petro Financial Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                      
|----------------------
|Date: August 13, 2004 
|/s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.
|(J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)  
|President and Director