alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE ex rel. Beaux CORMIER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2011-KH-0222.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

In re Cormier, Beaux; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Vermilion, 15th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 39682; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KH 10-01291.

Denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viewpoint Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Jay
S. Amato and William H. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our
knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: May 14, 2004
    By:
    /s/ JAY S. AMATOJay S. AmatoPresident and Chief Executive Officer Dated: May 14, 2004
    By:
    /s/ WILLIAM H. MITCHELLWilliam H. MitchellChief Financial Officer
News United States Air Force
 May issue of Airman magazine now availablePublished May 2, 2016
                        
                        By Airman Magazine Staff
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)  --**
                The May issue of Airman magazine is now available to download and is viewable through a Web browser.
In the cover story, titled “‘We Chose This,’” you’ll go behind the scenes of the challenging training course required to become a Phoenix Raven at the U.S. Air Force Expeditionary Center at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey.
In the next feature, you will read about the efforts of an officer and her spouse to support the wounded warrior support program through the care of 45 sled dogs for the Iditarod in Alaska.
Lastly, you’ll read about flight attendants on Air Force One.
You can download Airman magazine’s May issue for your tablet here:
• Apple version
• Android version
Airman magazine provides an interactive experience for tablet readers and a limited interactive version is viewable in Web browser format. To read this issue on your PC/Mac, click here.
For more stories, visit Airman Online, the website for the official magazine of the U.S. Air Force.Airman 



Airman magazine 



U.S. Air Force Expeditionary Center 



Raven 



Iditarod 



wounded warrior
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1047 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 

study to determine the suitability and feasibility of designating the Soldiers’ Memorial Military Museum located 

in St. Louis, Missouri, as a unit of the National Park 

System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

HR 1047 RFS

1 SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY REGARDING 

2 THE SOLDIERS’ MEMORIAL MILITARY MU3 SEUM. 

4 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds as follows: 

5 (1) The Soldiers’ Memorial is a tribute to all 

6 veterans located in the greater St. Louis area, in7 cluding Southern Illinois. 

8 (2) The current annual budget for the memorial 

9 is $185,000 and is paid for exclusively by the City 

10 of St. Louis. 

11 (3) In 1923, the City of St. Louis voted to 

12 spend $6,000,000 to purchase a memorial plaza and 

13 building dedicated to citizens of St. Louis who lost 

14 their lives in World War I. 

15 (4) The purchase of the 7 block site exhausted 

16 the funds and no money remained to construct a 

17 monument. 

18 (5) In 1933, Mayor Bernard F. Dickmann ap19 pealed to citizens and the city government to raise 

20 $1,000,000 to construct a memorial building and 

21 general improvement of the plaza area and the con22 struction of Soldiers’ Memorial began on October 

23 21, 1935. 

24 (6) On October 14, 1936, President Franklin 

25 D. Roosevelt officially dedicated the site. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

HR 1047 RFS

1 (7) On Memorial Day in 1938, Mayor 

2 Dickmann opened the building to the public. 

3 (b) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall carry 

4 out a study to determine the suitability and feasibility of 

5 designating the Soldiers’ Memorial Military Museum, lo6 cated at 1315 Chestnut, St. Louis, Missouri, as a unit 

7 of the National Park System. 

8 (c) STUDY PROCESS AND COMPLETION.—Section 

9 8(c) of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)) shall 

10 apply to the conduct and completion of the study required 

11 by this section. 

12 (d) REPORT.—The Secretary shall submit a report 

13 describing the results the study required by this section 

14 to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of 

15 Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Nat16 ural Resources of the Senate. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 Cadet instructor pilots teach Academy sophomores to soar in ArizonaPublished March 30, 2016
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Jasmine Reif
                        
                        
                        U.S. Air Force Academy Public Affairs
                **U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY, Colo. (AFNS) --**
                Blizzard-like conditions may have struck the U.S. Air Force Academy earlier this month, but in Arizona the weather was perfect for cadet instructor pilots who taught Academy sophomores the art of soaring.  During their two-week trip to Coolidge, Arizona, 15 cadets and four officers from the 94th Flying Training Squadron’s Academy Soaring Program taught the cadets how to perform aerobatics. “We went to Arizona to get six to seven straight days of flying,” said Cadet 1st Class Joseph Gould, a soaring instructor pilot. “The sophomores were nervous at first because they had never been inverted (in a glider), but they really got into it. They have a lot to learn, but by the end of the week they were very good at aerobatics.”The 94th FTS flies more than 17,000 sorties a year, making it the most active soaring operation in the U.S. Each year, 80 cadets attend a semester-long instructor pilot upgrade course.“The soaring program broadened my horizons,” said Cadet 3rd Class Merrick Isley. “I didn’t get to experience airmanship my freshman year and this program exposed me to the best the Academy has. This is a positive environment and helps everyone grow. This training in Arizona has been great because we don’t have school and I get to focus on flying.”Capt. Brian Ross, the 94th FTS group training officer, is a 2008 Academy grad. He returned to his alma mater in 2014 to learn to pilot gliders.“This program introduces cadets to aviation, which is what many of them will do in their Air Force careers,” he said. “It provides leadership opportunities because cadets are in charge of the trip. Making reservations and working with airfields gives them experience they will use in the operational Air Force when they go on a temporary duty assignment.”Four TG-16A gliders were trailered from the Academy to Arizona for the event.“It’s been a great experience and gives us a whole new perspective,” Gould said. “It’s a great way to get away from homework and be with people who want to fly. It’s a chance to challenge yourself and a lot of fun.”Academy 



soaring 



flying 



cadet 



U.S. Air Force Academy
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viewpoint Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Robert E. Rice, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

(1)  The Report to which this certification is attached as an exhibit, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |  |     |  |                                                                         
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  May 15, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ ROBERT E. RICE

Robert E. Rice
President and Chief Executive Officer
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 58 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of the month of October 

2007 as ‘‘Country Music Month’’ and to honor country 

music for its long history of supporting America’s armed 

forces and its tremendous impact on national patriotism. 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

HJ 58 RFS 

Whereas from the farms, ranches, and back roads of America 

comes a sound that is uniquely American; one that is 

about life and how that life should be lived; 

Whereas country music is a story of family, faith, freedom, 

hard work, opportunity, pride, and patriotism; 

Whereas country music embodies the spirit of America and 

the genuine feelings individuals experience throughout 

their lives such as joy and laughter, but also of sorrow 

and heartache; 

Whereas country music has played an integral part in encouraging Americans to support its armed forces and their 

role in protecting American ideals, mainly during times 

of national conflict, through numerous popular patriotic 

songs; 

Whereas the lyrics in these patriotic songs invoke sacrifice, 

responsibility, determination, freedom and liberty that 

were present during the nation’s founding; 

Whereas the lyrics in these patriotic songs talk about a calling to serve a higher duty, to come together with fellow 

citizens to defend and protect the freedoms we enjoy 

today given to us from those of past generations who 

paid the ultimate sacrifice; 

Whereas country music songs seek to educate about America’s history and teach listeners to learn from past lessons, to instill character and good citizenship; 

Whereas country music has millions of fans in cities and 

towns all across the United States from all ages and 

walks of life; and 

Whereas the Country Music Association celebrated its first 

National Country Music Month in 1964 and the month 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

HJ 58 RFS 

of October 2007 marks the 43rd annual observance of 

Country Music Month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress— 

4 (1) supports the designation of a ‘‘Country 

5 Music Month’’; 

6 (2) honors country music for its long history of 

7 supporting America’s armed forces and its tremen8 dous impact on national patriotism; and 

9 (3) requests and authorizes the President to 

10 issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the 

11 United States to observe such with appropriate cere12 monies and activities. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 30, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1215 

To authorize the Secretary of Energy to make certain loan guarantees for 

advanced conservation and fuel efficiency motor vehicle technology projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2007 

Mr. ROGERS of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Energy to make certain loan 

guarantees for advanced conservation and fuel efficiency 

motor vehicle technology projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY. 

4 Section 1703 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

5 U.S.C. 16513) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(f) FUEL EFFICIENT VEHICLE PROJECTS.—The 

8 Secretary shall make guarantees under this title to motor 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 1215 IH

1 vehicle manufacturers and suppliers in the United States 

2 for advanced conservation and fuel efficiency motor vehicle 

3 technology projects for the production of new motor vehi4 cles that do not exceed 10,000 lbs. gross vehicle weight, 

5 including gasoline and diesel vehicles, flexible fuel vehicles, 

6 and hybrid electric vehicles, that reduce dependence on oil 

7 and the emissions of one or more greenhouse gases.’’. 

8 SEC. 2. AMOUNT. 

9 Section 1702(c) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

10 U.S.C. 16512(c)) is amended by adding at the end the 

11 following: ‘‘In the case of advanced conservation and fuel 

12 efficiency motor vehicle technology projects under section 

13 1703(f), the aggregate amount of guarantees under this 

14 title shall not exceed $20,000,000,000.’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1558
GENE H. RHODES, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. CARLOS M. GUTIERREZ, Secretary of Commerce, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00711-TSE) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michele S. Bellizaire, Woodbridge, Virginia, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Ralph Andrew Price Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Gene H. Rhodes appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer on his complaint alleging age discrimination. We have reviewed the record included on appeal and the parties’ briefs and have found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rhodes v. Gutierrez , No. 1:06-cv-00711-TSE (E.D. Va. filed May 11, 2007; entered May 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7600

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JORGE VILLARIEL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CR-96-155-H, CA-99-303-5-H)

Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 17, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jorge Villariel, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jorge Villariel seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Villariel, Nos CR-96-155-H; CA99-303-5-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 21

- 00049

- CV

HOLCOMB RESOURCES , INC. , Appellant

V. OAKHOLLOW GROUP, LTD. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 348th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 348

- 30 0454

- 18

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess2 

### ME MORANDUM OPINION

Hol comb Resources, Inc., filed a notice of appeal in this matter on April 20, 20 2 1. The appellate record was due to be filed with this Cour t on or before May 2 1 , 20 2 1. Both the Tarrant County District Clerk 1 and the court reporter who recorded the trial court proceedings in this matter informed our clerk’s office that no payment and no arrangement for payment for the record’s preparation had been made by Holcomb

. Holcomb is not indigent and is, therefore, responsible for payment of the fees related to

p reparation of the appellate record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1; 35.3(a)(2), (b)(3); 37.3(b), (c)

. By
letter dated June 1 , 20 2 1, and pursuant to Rules 37.3 and 42.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we notified Holcomb of this defect and provided i t an opportunity to cure it. Further,
we warned Holcomb that , if we did not receive an adequate response to our defect letter within ten day s of the date of the letter, this appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b), (c) ; 42.3 (b)

.

1 Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 73.001.3

We have received no communication from Holcomb responsive to our June 1 correspondence

. Consequently, this appeal is ripe for dismissal. Pursuant to Rule 37.3, subsections (b) and (c), and Rule 42.3(b), we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(b), (c); 42.3(b).

Ralph K. Burgess Justice
Date Submitted: July 1, 2021 Date Decided: J uly 2, 2021
582 A.2d 295

#### IN THE MATTER OF EDWARD C. CHEW, III, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

November 27, 1990.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Emergent Suspension With Restraints

The Office of Attorney Ethics having petitioned the Supreme Court for an order temporarily suspending Edward C. Chew, III of Clementon from the practice of law pursuant to *R.1:20-5(b),*
      *462and for restraints on the disbursal of funds from all accounts maintained pursuant to *R.1:21-6,*and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Edward C. Chew, III of Clementon admitted to practice in this State in 1985, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics take such protective action pursuant to *R.1:20-11(c),*as may be appropriate to gain possession and control of the legal files, records, practice and trust assets of Edward C. Chew, III wherever situate, pending further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, presently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by Edward C. Chew, III pursuant to *R.1:21-6*shall be restrained from disbursement except upon application to this Court, for good cause shown, pending the further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Edward C. Chew, III show cause before this Court on the 20th day of December, 1990, at 2:00 p.m. in the Supreme Court courtroom, Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, why the temporary suspension and restraints herein should not continue pending final disposition of any complaints against him and until further order of the Court and further why the trust funds maintained by Edward C. Chew, III, restrained from disbursement by this Order, should not be transmitted by the financial institutions which are the present custodians to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the respondent may move prior to the return date of this Order to Show Cause, on an application for good cause shown, for modification of this Order or the restraints contained herein; and it is further

ORDERED that David E. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, or his designee, shall present this matter to the Court; and it is further

*463ORDERED that Edward C. Chew, III be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics governing suspended, disbarred or resigned attorneys.
#### J. T. Fields v. Crescent Insurance Co.

(No. 2008.)

Appeal from Fort Bend County.

W. L. Davidson, counsel for appellant.

Phil. P. Pearson, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Will-son, J.

§ 125. *Jury trial; party not entitled to, unless, etc.*When this case was called for trial in its regular order on the docket, appellant, who was plaintiff therein, demanded a trial by jury, and deposited the jury fee. Upon objection of appellee the court refused a trial by jury, because demand therefor had not been made on the first day of the term of the court, nor on appearance day. the case being an appearance case. *Held:*This ruling of the court was not error. A party is not entitled to a trial by jury unless he complies with the requirements of the statute. These requirements are to make application therefor, accompanying such application with the jury fee, on the first day of the term of the court, or on appearance day, if the case be an appearance one. [R. S. arts. 8064, 3065, 3066.] If the party be unable to deposit the jury fee, he must accompany the application with an affidavit to that effect. [R. S. art. 3067.] A failure to *158comply with these requirements makes it the duty o£ the court to refuse the party a trial by jury. [Hardin v. Blackshear, 60 Tex. 132.]

February *21,*1886.

Affirmed.