alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         136,274
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  203,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,500
<INVENTORY>                                    270,031
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,389,054
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,031,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,152,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,123,145
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,768
<COMMON>                                        15,673
<OTHER-SE>                                    (482,903)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,152,620
<SALES>                                      1,576,970
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,576,970
<CGS>                                        1,518,412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,230,405
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (695,491)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (695,491)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (732,928)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.13)
        

</TABLE>
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1374 

AN ACT 

To amend the Florida National Forest Land Management 

Act of 2003 to authorize the conveyance of an additional 

tract of National Forest System land under that Act, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1374 EH

1 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCES UNDER FLORIDA NATIONAL 

2 FOREST LAND MANAGEMENT ACT OF 2003. 

3 (a) ADDITIONAL CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—Sub4 section (b) of section 3 of the Florida National Forest 

5 Land Management Act of 2003 (Public Law 108–152; 

6 117 Stat. 1919) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

8 (17); 

9 (2) by redesignating paragraph (18) as para10 graph (19); 

11 (3) by inserting after paragraph (17) the fol12 lowing new paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(18) tract W–1979, located in Leon County 

14 consisting of approximately 114 acres, within T. 1 

15 S., R. 1 W., sec.25; and’’; and 

16 (4) in paragraph (19), as so redesignated, by 

17 striking ‘‘(17)’’ and inserting ‘‘(18)’’. 

18 (b) ADDITIONAL USE OF PROCEEDS.—Paragraph (2) 

19 of subsection (i) of such section (117 Stat. 1921) is 

20 amended— 

21 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara22 graph (A); 

23 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub24 paragraph (B) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

25 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub26 paragraph: 
3 

•HR 1374 EH

1 ‘‘(C) acquisition, construction, or mainte2 nance of administrative improvements for units 

3 of the National Forest System in the State.’’. 

4 (c) LIMITATIONS ON USE OF PROCEEDS.—Sub5 section (i) of such section is further amended by adding 

6 at the end the following new paragraphs: 

7 ‘‘(3) GEOGRAPHICAL AND USE RESTRICTION

8 FOR CERTAIN CONVEYANCE.—Notwithstanding para9 graph (2), proceeds from the sale or exchange of the 

10 tract described in subsection (b)(18) shall be used 

11 exclusively for the purchase of inholdings in the 

12 Apalachicola National Forest. 

13 ‘‘(4) RESTRICTION ON USE OF PROCEEDS FOR

14 ADMINISTRATIVE IMPROVEMENTS.—Proceeds from 

15 any sale or exchange of land under this Act may be 

16 used for administrative improvements, as authorized 

17 by paragraph (2)(C), only if the land generating the 

18 proceeds was improved with infrastructure.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 17, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1374 

AN ACT 

To amend the Florida National Forest Land Manland under that Act, and for other purposes. of an additional tract of National Forest System agement Act of 2003 to authorize the conveyance
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Christopher J. Policinski, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Land O’Lakes, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors:     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 30, 2007         By:       /s/ Christopher Policinski    Christopher J. Policinski    President and Chief Executive Officer
Department of the United States Air Force LogoBiography
                  United States Air ForceChennault
            MAJOR GENERAL CLAIRE  LEE CHENNAULT(With honorary grade of lieutenant general)Maj. Gen. Claire Lee Chennault was a World War II leader of the famed Flying Tigers in China, for whom Chennault Air Force Base, Lake Charles, La., is named. He was born Commerce, Texas, 1890; died New Orleans, La., July 27, 1958.Claire Chennault, legendary hero of the air war against the Japanese, grew up in Louisiana. He attended Louisiana State University and Louisiana State Normal College prior to being commissioned a first lieutenant in the Infantry Reserve in November 1917. He transferred immediately to the Signal Corps Aviation Section and served in World War I. Chennault was on duty at Langley Field, Va., and Kelly Field, Texas, after the war, learning to fly there and getting his wings in 1919.He studied aeronautical engineering at Kelly; performed squadron duties at Gerstner Field, La., and Ellington Field and Fort Bliss, Texas, until September 1923, when he went to Hawaii for three years at Luke Field as commanding officer of the 19th Pursuit Squadron. He came home to instruct for two years at Brooks Field, Texas, where he was promoted to captain in April 1929 and named director of flying. He next attended the Air Corps Tactical School at Langley Field, Va., graduating in June 1931 and remaining there as an instructor.Chennault was promoted to major in June 1936 at Maxwell Field where he was chief of Pursuit Training. He went to China shortly after the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War to train pursuit units of the Chinese Air Force. In the summer of 1941 he was made a brigadier general in the Chinese Air Force and put in charge of recruiting pursuit pilots for the American Volunteer Group who became famed as the Flying Tigers.Chennault was recalled to active duty by the Army Air Force April 15, 1942 as a colonel and was promoted to brigadier general a week later. In July he became commanding general of the U.S. Air Force in China and in March 1943 was promoted to major general and named to command the 14th Air Force in China. He spent the rest of World War II in this key combat role. He came home in July 1945 for a brief assignment to Headquarters Army Air Force and he retired from the service Oct. 31, 1945.Chennault went back to China in 1946 and stayed there until 1950 as president of Civil Air Transports. On July 18, 1958, the U.S. Air Force gave him the honorary grade of lieutenant general. He died nine days later, on July 27, at New Orleans.Department of the Air Force Logo
No. 87-6467.

#### Stamps *v.*Parke, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.02
 HARTFORD LIFE, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ENACTED BY SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life, Inc.;2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in
SEC Release 34-47986];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ Lizabeth H. ZlatkusLizabeth H. ZlatkusExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### In re Skipper M. DROST.

No. 2011-B-2188.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 2011.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.*

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent entered into an improper business transaction with a client and notarized a will which was not signed by the testator in his presence. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which the parties stipulated that respondent has violated Rules 1.1(a) (failure to provide competent representation to a client), 1.3 (failure to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client), 1.8(a) (entering into a business transaction with a client), and 8.4(c) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Skipper M. Drost, Louisiana Bar Roll number 5084, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for two years, with all but ninety days deferred, followed by a two-year period of supervised probation governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the Petition for *908Consent Discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent, the ODC, and the probation monitor execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be | ¡^grounds for making the deferred portion of the suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

*

 Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 186 (Monday, September 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 59296]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24050]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Committee for Engineering; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Engineering (1170).
    Date/Time: October 20, 2010: 12 p.m. to 6 p.m. October 21, 2010: 
8 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 
1235, Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Deborah Young, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Suite 505, Arlington, Virginia 22230, 703/292-
8300.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations and 
counsel on major goals and policies pertaining to engineering 
programs and activities.
    Agenda: The principal focus of the meeting on both days will be 
to discuss emerging issues and opportunities for the Directorate for 
Engineering and its divisions and review Committee of Visitors 
Reports.

    Dated: September 21, 2010.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-24050 Filed 9-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
583 A.2d 341

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LAWRENCE V. PIANKA.

March 20, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### O. A. Pickle v. S. F. Abbott.

(No. 2589.)

October 15, 1887.

Appeal from Smith County.

S. S. Johnson and H. B. Marsh, counsel for appellant.

Stephen Reaves, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 345. *Appeal bond from justice’s court; solvency of sureties upon cannot be questioned in the appellate court; case stated.*Appellee having recovered a judgment in justice’s court against appellant, the latter appealed to the county court, executiiig and delivering to the justice an appeal bond, conditioned, etc., and within the time prescribed by law, and which bond was approved by said justice. In the county court, upon motion of appellee, the appeal was dismissed. One of the grounds of said motion was that the sureties upon said appeal bond were insolvent. *Held,*that the solvency of the sureties upon an appeal bond cannot be inquired into in the appellate court. When such bond is approved by the court *a quo*the jurisdiction of the appellate court attaches, and cannot be defeated by showing the insolvency of the sureties. To permit such a procedure would produce great uncertainty. The party appealing would never know with certainty that his appeal would be sustained, and, to render it certain, would have to be prepared with evidence to establish the solvency of his sureties before the appellate court. The other grounds of the motion to 'dismiss the appeal were determined adversely to said motion in Jones v. Spann, *ante.*§§ 283, 284.

Reversed and remanded.
exv4wa



 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Page 17 of 19
Pages




Exhibit 4-A



REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT
JOINDER



     As of the date set forth below, the undersigned, as a holder of membership
interests in Educational Simon, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
(“Educational Simon”), is acquiring from Educational
Simon
     1,478,700     
shares of common stock (the “Shares”) of Excelligence Learning Corporation, a
Delaware corporation and successor entity to LearningStar Corp. (the
“Company”), in connection with a distribution to members of Educational Simon
on such date. By execution of this Registration Rights Agreement Joinder, the
undersigned, as successor to Educational Simon in respect of the Shares, shall
be deemed to be a party to that certain Amended and Restated Registration
Rights Agreement, entered into effective as of June 30, 2001
(the “Registration
Rights Agreement”), by and among the Company and the certain stockholders of
the Company identified from time to time on the signature pages thereto.
Pursuant to Sections 13 and 25 of the Registration Rights Agreement, the
undersigned, as successor to Educational Simon in respect of the Shares, shall
have all rights, and shall observe all the obligations, applicable to a
“Holder” under the Registration Rights Agreement. In order to give effect to
this transaction, please add the undersigned to the list of
“Holders” as set
forth in Schedule A to the Registration Rights Agreement.



	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
Name of Individual or Entity:
	 
	 	 	
William E. Simon & Sons Private Equity Partners, L.P.



	 
	 	 	
Address for Notices:
	 
	 	 	
310 South Street

P.O. Box 1913

Morristown, NJ  07962-1913
	 
	 
	 	 	
William E. Simon & Sons Private Equity

    Partners, L.P.

BY:  William E. Simon & Sons Private Equity, L.L.C.

ITS: General Partner

BY:  WESKIDS III, L.L.C.

ITS: Managing Member
	 
	 
	Date: November 20, 2003	 	
By: /s/ Christine W. Jenkins



       Name: Christine W. Jenkins

       Title: Vice President
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.

URIAN YOUNG , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 16

- 0791 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CR 94

- 10928 The Honorable Gregory Como , Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENI ED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney ’ s Office , Phoenix By Diane Meloche Counsel for Respondent
Urian Young , Yuma Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Kenton D. Jones, Judge Jon W. Thompson, and Judge Samuel A. Thumma delivered the decision of the Court

. FILED 10-19-2017STATE v. YOUNG Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Urian Young seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Proce dure 32.1. This is the petitioner’s first successive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this Court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a p etition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 576

- 77, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion in denying the petition. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not shown any abuse of discretion. ¶4 Accordingly, we grant review and deny relief.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23821]



[[Page 57740]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    The following notice of meeting is published pursuant to the 
provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, 5 
U.S.C. 552b.

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE:  9:30 a.m. to 11 a.m., October 1, 2010.

PLACE: Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 
Lobby Level Hearing Room (Room 1000).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    <bullet> Issuance of an interim final rule relating to the time 
frame for reporting pre-enactment unexpired swaps to a swap data 
repository or to the Commission;
    <bullet> Issuance of proposed rules that would prescribe (i) 
certain risk management standards for those derivatives clearing 
organizations designated as systemically important (``SIDCOs'') by the 
Financial Stability Oversight Council under Title VIII of the Dodd-
Frank Act and (ii) standards requiring sixty (60) days advance notice 
of changes in SIDCO rules, procedures, or operations that materially 
affect the nature or level of risks presented by the SIDCO; and
    <bullet> Issuance of proposed rules specifying requirements for 
derivatives clearing organizations, designated contract markets, and 
swap execution facilities on governance arrangements and mitigation of 
conflicts of interest.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: David A. Stawick, Secretary of the 
Commission, 202-418-5071.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-23821 Filed 9-20-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
583 A.2d 305

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TYRONE ARTHUR.

January 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.