alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1058]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              HONORING THE SOCORRO HIGH SCHOOL NJROTC UNIT

                                 ______

                         HON. RONALD D. COLEMAN

                                of texas

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, May 17, 1995
  Mr. COLEMAN. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to give special recognition to 
a group of students from my congressional district, the members of 
Socorro High School's Naval Junior ROTC unit.
  This unit has developed into one of the best NJROTC units in the 
country. It has placed first in area 11 in 3 of the last 4 years. The 
unit has also received the highest grade out of 360 high schools in the 
Nation. Under the able guidance and direction of Commander William J. 
Woodward, USN Ret., the cadets of our NJROTC unit have learned how to 
succeed in competitive situations and prevail in times of adversity.
  Mr. Speaker, I also want to recognize the tremendous support in the 
community of Socorro, TX for the unit. During one of the unit's 
ceremonial evaluations, numerous civic, fraternal, and military leaders 
were present as well as approximately 900 sixth through eighth graders 
from local elementary and middle schools. The facilities the unit uses 
are among the best in area 11. Classrooms, office and storage areas are 
spacious, well organized and very well maintained. It is very obvious 
that the cadets, school, and the community take a great deal of pride 
in the NJROTC program.
  I also ask my colleagues to pay tribute to Commander Woodward's 
assistants: Sgt. Major Robert D. Way, USMC Ret., and Chief Petty 
officer Oscar R. Martinez, USN Ret. Both these individuals have 
provided countless hours of support and guidance enhancing the 
aspirations of the cadets of the unit.
  Mr. Speaker, it is with great pride that I recognize the students, 
parents, teachers, and school administrators involved with the Socorro 
High School NJROTC unit. I ask my colleagues to join me in saluting 
them and wishing them well in their future endeavors.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 Sparks fly in metal technology shopPublished June 29, 2015
                        
                        By Senior Airman David Owsianka
                        
                        
                        374th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **YOKOTA AIR BASE, Japan (AFNS) --**
                Sparks fly as Airmen help pieces of metal take form. These Airmen sometimes create something from nothing or improve necessary equipment for squadrons to continue their daily tasks.
Airmen from the metal technology section of the 374th Maintenance Squadron fabrication flight play an essential role in completing the Yokota Air Base mission by keeping aircraft flying.
"Our shop does things that no other shop can do," said Staff Sgt. Robert Freeman, a 374th MXS aircraft metals technology craftsman. "We are kind of the last line of defense on base, when something is broken and nobody can fix it, they bring it to us."
The metal technology shop performs maintenance work with welding and machining equipment to keep the aircraft in flight and repair equipment for various base agencies.
Jobs the unit completes are measuring broken or worn parts, drawing working sketches, arc welding, performing precision grinding to remove poisonous or corrosive deposits, and writing programs for machines using manual and computer-aided manufacturing methods.
A typical repair request the shop receives is to fix the exhaust on a C-130 Hercules. The shop grinds out the cracks and welds the repair.
The shop also manufactures metal parts for other Yokota AB squadrons, such as a bracket for a trash compactor crane for the 374th Civil Engineer Squadron.
"Our job is important because if tools or parts cannot be acquired by the Air Force, we can replicate, make or improve those tools," said Senior Airman Justin Weeks, a 374th MXS aircraft metals technology journeyman.
If the shop didn't exist, the base would have to outsource the work off base in Japan or try to get something from a boneyard in the states.
"We are here to prevent that from happening, because sometimes parts are not procurable anymore," Freeman said. "We create and maintain various parts for the aircraft to ensure it is capable to fly and ensure the safety of the aircrew."Yokota AB 



Japan 



PACAF 



374th Maintenance Squadron 



metal shop
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.39

                             MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.
                            1997 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
                                AMENDMENT 1999-I


     WHEREAS, Meade Instruments Corp. (the "Corporation") maintains the Meade
Instruments Corp. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation approved the amendment
to the Plan set forth herein;

     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Section 5.2(c) of the Plan be, and it
hereby is, amended to read as follows:

     "(c) Maximum Performance-Based Award. Notwithstanding any other provision
     of the Plan to the contrary, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock
     which may be delivered pursuant to options, stock appreciation rights,
     restricted stock or other share-based awards that are granted as
     Performance-Based Awards to any Participant in any calendar year shall not
     exceed 350,000 shares, either individually or in the aggregate, subject to
     adjustment as provided in Section 6.2. Awards that are cancelled during the
     year shall be counted against this limit to the extent required by Section
     162(m) of the Code. In addition, the aggregate amount of compensation to be
     paid to any Participant in respect of any Cash-Based Awards that are
     granted during any calendar year as Performance-Based Awards shall not
     exceed $1,000,000."

     RESOLVED FURTHER, that the foregoing Plan amendment shall be effective
immediately, subject, however, to stockholder approval of such amendment at the
next regularly scheduled meeting of stockholders.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused its duly authorized officer
to execute this Amendment 1999-I on this 24th day of February, 1999.


                                            MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.


                                            By:  /s/ Steven G. Murdock
                                                 -------------------------------
                                            Name: Steven G. Murdock
                                            Its:   President, Chief Operating
                                                   Officer and Secretary
583 A.2d 347

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GERALD WATTS.

March 26, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-41680

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EMMANUEL OLUBUKOLA ABIONA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:16-CR-519-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Emmanuel 

Olubukola Abiona has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Abiona has not filed a response. We 

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-41680 Document: 00514122596 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
No. 16-41680

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-41680 Document: 00514122596 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RONALD T. WILLIAMS.

April 18, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 AF releases candidate bases for Battlefield Airman trainingPublished July 7, 2016
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Today the Air Force announced eight installations as candidate locations where it will potentially consolidate its Battlefield Airman training.
The installations include: Eglin Air Force Base, Florida; Hurlburt Field, Florida; Joint Base San Antonio, Texas; Keesler AFB, Mississippi; Little Rock AFB, Arkansas; Patrick AFB, Florida; Shaw AFB, South Carolina; and Vandenberg AFB, California.
“The Air Force is committed to a deliberate and open process to address Battlefield Airman basing,” said Jennifer A. Miller, the deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for installations. “As we progress through the basing process, we will share information so interested communities are aware of what to expect.”
Last year, the Air Force reviewed its Battlefield Airman training. The review determined grouping training at consolidated locations may lead to improvements and synergies in the current training processes. As a result, the Air Force is investigating potential locations to consolidate training.
Over the last several months, the Air Force gathered information from all Air Force installations in the continental United States and assessed it against mission requirements, capacity, environmental considerations, and cost to determine options for consolidating Battlefield Airman training, if the Air Force indeed chooses to consolidate Battlefield Airman training at fewer locations.
The Air Force will now conduct detailed, on-the-ground evaluations (site surveys) of the candidate bases covering the full range of operational and infrastructure requirements. The results of the surveys will be briefed to the secretary of the Air Force and chief of staff of the Air Force, who will then select preferred and reasonable alternatives. The Air Force will analyze the potential environmental impacts at each location before a final basing decision is made.
The preferred and reasonable alternatives are expected to be selected in early 2017.
Currently, Battlefield Airman training is conducted at eight primary training locations across seven states.FM 



Eglin AFB 



Hurlburt Field 



Joint Base San Antonio 



Keesler AFB 



Little Rock AFB 



Patrick AFB 



Shaw AFB 



Vandenberg AFB 



Battlefield Airman
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

      ( print page 57545)    
The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application.

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2010-0218.                

*Date Filed:*                     August 31, 2010.                

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*                     Finally Adopted Resolution 600i, Recommended Practice 1601, and Recommended Practice 1670.                 

*Intended effective date:*                     1 October 2010.                

Renee V. Wright, 

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2010-23508 Filed 9-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
News United States Air Force
 AF readiness for global combat powerPublished Aug. 26, 2016
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Mya M. Crosby
                        
                        
                        355th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. (AFNS) --**
                The 355th Logistics Readiness Squadron logistics planners, a shop of 14 Airmen, coordinate and direct personnel and cargo from Davis-Monthan Air Force Base.
They control and direct everything having to do with the process of deployments and exercises in order to support operations around the globe.
“We may be small, but we have a very big impact,” said Airman 1st Class Joice Dominguez, a 355th LRS logistics planner. “We’re the focal point. We just kind of put everybody together.”
This year the logistics planners have deployed approximately 1,000 personnel, 40 percent of them in July alone. Of that 40 percent, four units were supporting Operation Inherent Resolve, furthering the Air Force’s mission to fly, fight and win in air, space and cyberspace.
The logistics planners have also coordinated four exercises, one of them being Green Flag-West, a joint exercise between the Air Force, Army, and Marine Corps and, administered by the U.S. Air Force Warfare Center.
Davis-Monthan AFB also supported five combatant commands, implementing their global effect. 
“We support the fight,” said Staff Sgt. Brian Bober, the 355th LRS NCO in charge of deployments. “We deploy personnel to the areas of responsibility, we make sure the A-10 (Thunderbolt II) pilots and maintainers and all the support personnel get the proper training for real-world missions.”
A large focus of logistics planners is coordination between base agencies when generating priorities of supporting combat airpower and agile combat support.
The Airmen act as the nucleus of the cell, controlling how things happen by correlating with all agencies from unit deployment managers to air transportation in order to get deployments in motion and personnel out the door.Davis-Monthan AFB 



ACC 



deployment 



Operation Inherent Resolve 



logistics
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1539

THEODORE JUSTICE,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ROBERT H. HOBGOOD, JR., Senior Resident Superior Court 

Judge in the Ninth Judicial District, in his individual and 

official capacity,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (5:13-cv-00677-BR)

Submitted: November 18, 2014 Decided: November 20, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore Justice, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Theodore Justice seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order reviewing the magistrate judge’s determination and denying 

Justice’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. Denial of 

in forma pauperis status is reviewed for abuse of discretion. 

See Roberts v. United States Dist. Ct., 339 U.S. 844, 845 

(1950). A review of the record indicates that the district 

court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Justice v. 

Hobgood, No. 5:13-cv-00677-BR (E.D.N.C. May 27, 2014). We deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## NO. 12

- 1 3

- 00 021

- C V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

FOUR THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST

EIGHTY

- FIVE DOLLARS ($4,485.00)
IN U.S. CURRENCY,

APPELLANT

V. § JUD ICIAL DISTRICT COURT

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This pro se in forma pauperis appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in this case was

signed on October 25, 2012. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal that failed to contain the

information required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of

servic e showing service on all parties to the trial court's judgment.

On January 18, 2013, Appellant was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with Rules 9.5 and

25.1(e). He wa s further notified that unless he filed an amended notice of appeal on or before

February 18, 2013, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.3(c). The deadline for filing an amended notice of appeal has passed, and Appellant has not

corrected his defective notice of appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to

comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(c); Feist v. Berg

,

No. 12

- 04

- 00004

- CV, 2004 WL 252785, at *1 (Tex . App.

- Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied);

Feist v. Hubert , No. 12

- 03

- 00442

- CV, 2004 WL 252285, at *1 (Tex. App.

- Tyler Feb. 11, 2004,

pet. denied).2

Opinion delivered February 28 , 2013.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)3 

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

FEBRUARY 28 , 2013

NO. 12

- 13

- 00021

- CV

FOUR THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY

- FIVE DOLLARS

($4,485.00) IN U.S. CURRENCY

,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

Appeal from the 241st Judicial District Court

of Smith County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 10

- 3109

- C )

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal shou ld be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed ; and that this decision be certified to the court

below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C .J., Griffith, J. , and Hoyle , J.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6698-S6699]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 THE COLUMBIA GORGE INTERPRETIVE CENTER

 Mr. GORTON. Mr. President, it is my privilege to recognize the 
grand opening of the Columbia Gorge Interpretive Center in Stevenson, 
WA on Wednesday, May 17, 1995. The grand opening celebration will start 
at 10:30 a.m. with the award-winning Stevenson High School Band and 
choir, and conclude with Nelson Moses of the Wishram Tribe and members 
of his family giving a native American blessing to the project.
  The Interpretive Center is dedicated to preserving the natural and 
cultural history of the magnificent Columbia River Gorge. Exhibits and 
displays will educate, entertain and inform adults and children alike. 
As they tour the center they will see the First Peoples and Harvesting 
Resources galleries and the multi-media Creation Theatre, which shows 
the cataclysmic events [[Page S6699]] that shaped the gorge. They will 
also learn about the people who built the communities of the gorge--
pioneers, missionaries, riverboat captains, soldiers, dam-builders and 
all the rest--in all, a wonderful cast of characters.
  Other exhibits feature natural resources, dams and other developments 
on the river. This center encourage Washingtonians to consider their 
role in the stewardship of the mighty Columbia River, one of our great 
natural wonders.

                          ____________________
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Written Statement
Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 The undersigned, Brent W. Christensen, the Chief Financial Officer of
Meade Instruments Corp. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, hereby
certifies that: (i) the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2004 of the
Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: May 27, 2005 By: /s/ Brent W. Christensen This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.