alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23530]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12318 and <greek-i>12319]


Illinois Disaster <greek-i> IL-00027

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Illinois (FEMA--
1935--DR), dated 09/13/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 07/19/2010 through 08/07/2010.

DATES: Effective Date: 09/13/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/12/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/13/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 09/13/2010, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Adams, Carroll, Jo Daviess, Ogle, Pike, Schuyler, 
Stephenson.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere....     3.625
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere.     3.000
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere.     3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 123186 
and for economic injury is 123196.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-23530 Filed 9-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Eric Dale MICKELSON.

No. 2010-KK-2235.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 19, 2010.

In re State of Louisiana; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 4, No. 262,256; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46017-KW.

Writ granted. We find no abuse of the trial court’s discretion in finding evidence of the defendant’s unadjudicated offense to be admissible during the penalty phase of the defendant’s capital trial. Accordingly, the ruling of the court of appeal is reversed. The trial court ruling is reinstated.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1253 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Charles W. Lindberg Department of Veterans 

Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2007 

Mr. WALZ of Minnesota introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 

Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Charles W. 

Lindberg Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 

Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF CHARLES W. LINDBERG DE4 PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUT5 PATIENT CLINIC. 

6 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Af7 fairs Outpatient Clinic located at 1617 Skyline Drive, 

8 Rochester, Minnesota, shall after the date of the enactmstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1253 IH

1 ment of this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Charles 

2 W. Lindberg Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 

3 Clinic’’. 

4 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula5 tion, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

6 States to the outpatient clinic referred to in subsection 

7 (a) shall be considered to be a reference to the Charles 

8 W. Lindberg Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 

9 Clinic. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.4

Quintiles Transnational Corp. and Subsidiaries
Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quintiles Transnational Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2003, as amended by Amendment
No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, James L. Bierman, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ James L. BiermanJames L. Bierman
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial OfficerAugust 26, 2003Date


This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

58
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Edwards AFB squadron tests missile for European ally’s F-35

              - Published  Nov. 4, 2016
              -                             By Kenji Thuloweit                                                    
              - 412th Test Wing Public Affairs

**EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFNS) --  **
From Norway to Australia, members from a number of allied and partner nations have come to Edwards Air Force Base to team with base units to test systems, enhance international cooperation and advance their own air force’s capabilities.At the 416th Flight Test Squadron, a team of U.S. Air Force engineers and pilots are working with Norwegian government and industry personnel in testing the Joint Strike Missile. The JSM is designed to be carried in the F-35A’s internal weapons bay and is the only powered, anti-surface warfare missile to do so according to Norwegian officials, said James Cook, the 416th FLTS JSM program manager.The JSM is an advanced missile made of composite materials and uses stealth technology. It has air intakes, fold-out wings and tail fins. The navigation system supports terrain-following flight and can be used against sea- and land-based targets.Before it can be integrated with the F-35A, it is being tested on F-16 Fighting Falcons from the 416th FLTS. The F-16 provides an excellent platform to initially test the missile before it’s transferred to the fifth-generation fighter, test managers said.“What we’re doing is conducting risk-mitigation testing with the F-16 before the JSM is integrated on the F-35,” Cook said.All tests are conducted over the Utah Test and Training Range.“I think it’s awesome to be a part of the next generational fighter while being in a legacy fighter combined test force. I’m excited to see the final outcome, which will be the culmination of all we’ve done here. To see it hit the target and explode the way it was planned to do,” Cook said.Along with Cook, the JSM team consists of test pilots Maj. John Trombetta and Maj. Jameel Janjua (Royal Canadian Air Force), flight test engineers Eric Biesen and Tom Smeeks and Collin Drake, project engineer.The JSM program at the 416th is one project that falls under the squadron’s European Participating Air Force Program, which Cook manages. The squadron conducts tests for European customers when requested.

AustraliaNorwayEdwards AFBACCJoint Training
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5625]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Will the gentleman from Texas, Mr. Gene 
Green, come forward and lead the House in the Pledge of Allegiance?
  Mr. Gene Green of Texas led the Pledge of Allegiance as follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United 
     States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, 
     one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice 
     for all.

                          ____________________
```
#### B. Oppenheimer & Co. v. F. S. Fritter.

(No. 3683.)

Error from Kinney County.

*(Transferred from, Austin. J*

Ellis & Dial, counsel for plaintiffs in error.

No counsel appeared for defendant in error.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 263. *Jurisdiction of county court as to amount; allegation of damage in petition in suit on note held surplusage; case stated.*Oppenheimer & Co. sued Fritter upon a promissory note for $413.15, The petition is in the ordinary form, except that it alleges damages in the sum of $1,000 for failure to pay the debt sued for. Fritter pleaded to the jurisdiction of the court upon the ground that the amount of the note sued for, and the damages claimed, exceeded the jurisdiction of the court. This plea was sustained and the suit was dismissed. *Held*error. In cases of failure to pay money which is due, the true measure of damages is the amount of money owing, with interest at the legal rate, and as a general rule more than this cannot be allowed. [Vennum v. Gregory, 21 Iowa, 326; Guy v. Franklin, 5 Cal. 416; *321Thayer v. Hedges, 21 Ind. 141.] This suit being upon a promissory note, it is manifest the plaintiff could recover no more than legal interest as damages, and in fact his suit is brought to recover no more than the principal and interest of the debt. The *ad damnum*allegation in the petition claiming $1,000 damages is surplusage, and should have been so treated. The real amount in controversy was the debt and interest thereon, and of this amount the court had jurisdiction.

February 16, 1887.

Reversed and remanded.
#### W. G. Martin v. J. E. Jones and Wife.

(No. 2255.)

Appeal from Taylor County.

*(Transferred from Austin.)*

Spoonts *&*Legett, counsel for appellant.

Bentley & Bowyer, counsel for appellees.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 205. *Parties; wife is a proper parly plaintiff with her husband in suit on*note, *her separate property; case stated.*Appellees sued appellant on a note executed by him and made payable to appellee, Mrs. Jones. The petition alleged that said note was the separate property of said Mrs. Jones. *Held:*The wife was a proper party plaintiff in the suit, it being alleged in the petition that said note ivas her separate property. [R. S. art. 1204; Sayles & Bassett’s Pl. & Pr. § 269.] It was not necessary to allege in the petition the facts which piade said note the separate property of the wife. Such facts were matters of evidence,- not of pleading.

§ 206. *Execution of note with the understanding that another party ivas also to' sign it; effect of such a contract; rules as to.*Appellant pleaded specially that when he signed said note it was with the understanding that appellee J. E. Jones would also sign the same as a comaker thereof with him, and that said note should not be delivered to Mrs. Jones, and should not become operative and binding upon appellant, until it had been so signed by said J. E. Jones; that this understanding was known to Mrs. Jones at the time he signed and delivered said note to J. E. Jones, and that said J. E. Jones was acting as her agent in the transaction, and that said J. E. Jones delivered said note to his wife without signing the same, and in violation of said contract. Upon exception thereto made by appellees, said plea was stricken oút. *Held,*there was no error in striking out the plea. It is *252well settled that delivery to the payee of a negotiable note is, in law, absolute and complete. If the note had been delivered to a person not a party thereto, as an *escrow,*not to be delivered to the payee until J. E. Jones had also signed it, and these facts had been known to the payee, the note would not be binding, as J. E. Jones did not sign it. But the note having been delivered to J. E. Jones, the agent of the payee, this was a delivery in law to the payee, and was absolute and complete, and hence the plea afforded no defense to this suit. [1 Danl. Neg. Inst. §§ 854, 855; Scott v. Bank, 9 Ark. 36.]

December 8, 1886.

Affirmed.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1262 

To permit the Secretary of Education to continue to waive certain regulatory 

requirements with respect to the use of aid funds for restarting school 

operations after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2007 

Mr. MELANCON (for himself, Mr. BAKER, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. BOUSTANY, 

Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. SCHIFF, and Mr. JINDAL) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To permit the Secretary of Education to continue to waive 

certain regulatory requirements with respect to the use 

of aid funds for restarting school operations after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY. 

4 Section 105(b) of title IV of division B of Public Law 

5 109–148 (119 Stat. 2797) is amended by adding at the 

6 end the following new sentence: ‘‘With respect to the pro7 gram authorized by section 102 of this Act, the waiver 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1262 IH

1 authority in subsection (a) of this section shall be available 

2 until the end of fiscal year 2008.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.01**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

Keynote Systems, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-107442, 333-85242, 333-73244, 333-47980, and 333-87791) on Form S-8 of Keynote Systems, Inc. of our reports dated December 6, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Keynote Systems, Inc. andsubsidiaries as of September 30, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedSeptember 30, 2005, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005,which reports appear in the September 30, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Keynote Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries. 

 

Our report, dated December 6, 2005, on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005, expresses our opinion that Keynote Systems, Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005 because ofthe effect of a material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states: 

 

The Company identified a material weakness related to accounting for income taxes. Specifically, the Company did not have resources with adequatetechnical knowledge related to accounting for deferred income taxes in order to prepare or review the income tax related amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements. This material weakness resulted in a material error in theCompany’s consolidated financial statements related to the inappropriate recording of a reduction in the valuation allowance as a benefit for income taxes rather than as a reduction of goodwill. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

Mountain View, California 

December 6, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23615]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-1777-000]


Sundevil Power Holdings, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

September 14, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Sundevil Power Holdings, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 4, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1f595a4d5c50717376717a4c6a6f6f706d6b5f797a6d7c31787069"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95d3d0c7d6dafbf9fcfbf0c6e0e5e5fae7e1d5f3f0e7f6bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-23615 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
News United States Air Force
 NATO program develops tactical leadersPublished Oct. 14, 2015
                        
                        By Capt. Sybil Taunton
                **ALBACETE, Spain (AFNS) --**
                Fighter pilots from seven allied countries, including the U.S., U.K., Spain, Czech Republic, Greece, Poland, and Italy completed the NATO Tactical Leadership Program here Oct. 9.Six F-15C Eagles and more than 100 personnel from the 48th Fighter Wing at Royal Air Force Lakenheath, England, contributed to the program."I think it's important for our graduates to be well versed in the capabilities of NATO partners," said Lt. Col. John Stratton, the 493rd Fighter Squadron commander. "For us to remain 'Forward, Ready, Now,' it requires the entire team to be efficient in deploying, executing the mission and redeploying to any location at any time."Throughout the program, NATO and allied pilots prepared to become mission commanders by leading coalition strike packages, instructing allied flying as well as nonflying personnel in matters related to tactical air operations."We have tactics, techniques and procedures that NATO stipulates, and this program is how we put those into practice," said RAF Flight Lt. Nick Critchell.From the pilots operating in the air to crews keeping things running on the ground, the Airmen from participating countries worked together at all levels."The working relationships have been excellent," said Senior Airman Dylan Wheeler, a 748th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron crew chief. "It feels like we have similar goals, and everyone works well together."Switzerland, France and Belgium also contributed personnel to the program with instructor pilots, search and rescue assets, and aerial reconnaissance experts."This program is a validation of baseline procedures and is a testament that we can turn up and perform from the same sheet of music," Critchell said.RAF Lakenheath 



England 



F-15 Eagle 



F-15 



joint 



Spain 



USAFE 



NATO Tactical Leadership Program