alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
579 A.2d 816

#### IN THE MATTER OF IRA S. PERS, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

September 28, 1990.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Emergent Suspension With Restraints

The Office of Attorney Ethics having petitioned the Supreme Court for an order temporarily suspending Ira S. Pers of Newark from the practice of law pursuant to R.1:20-5(b), and for restraints on the disbursal of funds from all accounts maintained pursuant to *R.1:21-6,*and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Ira S. Pers of Newark admitted to practice in this State in 1983, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics take such protective action pursuant to *R.1:20-11(c),*as may be appropriate to gain possession and control of the legal files, records, practice and trust assets of Ira S. Pers wherever situate, pending further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, presently existing in any New Jersey financial institution, including but not limited to Hudson City Savings Bank, Newark, New Jersey, Attorney *248Trust Account No. 057100144 and Attorney Business Account No. 047104839, pursuant to *R.1:21-6*shall be restrained from disbursement except upon application to this Court, for good cause shown, pending the further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Ira S. Pers show cause before this Court on October 10, 1990, at 2:00 p.m. in the Supreme Court Courtroom, Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, why the temporary suspension and restraints herein should not continue pending final disposition of any complaints against him and until further order of the Court and further why the trust funds maintained by Ira S. Pers, restrained from disbursement by this Order, should not be transmitted by the financial institutions which are the present custodians to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the respondent may move prior to the return date of this Order to Show Cause, on an application for good cause shown, for modification of this Order or the restraints contained herein; and it is further

ORDERED that David E. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, or his designee, shall present this matter to the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Ira S. Pers be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics governing suspended, disbarred or resigned attorneys.
Sonic Jet Performance, Inc.
                          11782 Western Avenue- Unit B
                               Stanton, CA, 90680


                                 March 31, 2003

 Dear  Frank:

          This letter confirms that we have offered you employment with us on
 the following terms, to begin March 31, 2003:

1.   Your title will be Director of Business Devleopment, reporting directly to
     the President. All decisions that have material effect the business must be
     authorized by the President. The term of this agreement is one year.

2.   Your initial salary is $120,000 annually, paid biweekly.

3.   In addition to your base salary, you will be issued free trading stock
     pursuant to S-8 registration equal to 500,000 shares which will be issued
     at the conclusion of this agreement.

4.   You shall be reimbursed for reasonable and necessary business expenses
     authorized and verified to Company's satisfaction.

5.   This agreement will terminate on April 1, 2004. Following it's termination,
     the Company may terminate this agreement at any time for any reason with or
     without cause. No one has the authority to change this except by a written
     agreement signed by both parties. 30 days notice would be expected from you
     and would be given to you (or pay in lieu of notice) absent unusual
     circumstances.

6.   We each mutually agree to arbitrate any and all differences, claims, or
     disputes, of every kind (statutory or other) arising out of your employment
     or its termination. Such arbitration would be in Orange County, California,
     or other mutually-agreed location, before the American Arbitration
     Association, and in lieu of any court action.

     No other promises or representations have been made to you.

     Please sign below and return the original to me to accept employment.

                                                  Very truly yours,


                                                  Madhava Rao Mankal
                                                  CFO Sonic Jet Performance

        Agreed to this 1st day or April, 2003

        -----------------------------
        Frank Kavanaugh
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 12.1

                             FIRST INDUSTRIAL, L.P.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                         ------------------------------
                                                                         2003       2002       2001
                                                                         --------   --------   --------
<S>                                                                      <C>        <C>        <C>
Income from Continuing Operations.....................................   $ 48,122   $ 79,774   $109,702

Plus: Interest Expense and Amortization of Deferred Financing
Costs.................................................................     96,959     89,297     80,583
                                                                         --------   --------   --------

Earnings Before Fixed Charges ........................................   $145,081   $169,071   $190,285
                                                                         ========   ========   ========

Fixed Charges ........................................................   $ 97,720   $ 97,089   $ 90,533
                                                                         ========   ========   ========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (a) ...............................      1.48x      1.74x      2.10x
                                                                         ========   ========   ========
</TABLE>

(a)      For purposes of computing the ratios of earnings to fixed charges,
         earnings have been calculated by adding fixed charges (excluding
         capitalized interest) to income from continuing operations. Fixed
         charges consist of interest costs, whether expensed or capitalized and
         amortization of deferred financing costs.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-281-CR

FABIAN LEE GREEN JR.	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

						----------

	We have considered the “Appellant’s Motion To Withdraw The Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure.   Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). 							 										PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 18, 2008
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30784 Conference Calendar

ALTON J. CHAISSON, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BREAUX ET AL., Defendants, DON BREAUX ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-1183

- - - - - - - - - - August 20, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Alton J. Chaisson, III appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in the civil rights action that his deceased father, Alton Chaisson, Jr., filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986. Chaisson argues that the evidence was sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether prison officials at LouisianaNo. 97-30784 -2- Parish Correctional Center (LPCC) provided the plaintiff with inadequate medical care. He further argues that LPCC officials violated the plaintiff’s rights under the Equal Protection Clause by discriminating against him on the basis of his race. The district court did not err in concluding that LPCC officials were not deliberately indifferent to the plaintiff’s medical needs. See Estelle v. Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976). The district court also did not err in holding that the plaintiff failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether LPCC officials discriminated against him on the basis of his race. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242, 248-49 (1986). This appeal lacks arguable merit and is thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. APPEAL DISMISSED.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23909]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold 
a meeting on September 29, 2010, 10 a.m. at the Board's meeting room on 
the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, 
Chicago, Illinois 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:

(1) Executive Committee Reports

    The entire meeting will be open to the public. The person to 
contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the 
Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

    Dated: September 20, 2010.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-23909 Filed 9-21-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
#### Danny MERRIMAN, Petitioner, v. Walter A. McNEIL, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 1D10-6092.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 6, 2010.

Danny Merriman, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. *See Powell v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr.,*727 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
News United States Air Force
 September issue of Airman magazine now availablePublished Aug. 31, 2015
                        
                        
                        Airman magazine staff
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**In this issue of Airman magazine, we remember those who were impacted by Hurricane Katrina when the storm hit land 10 years ago. The Airmen of Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi, faced numerous challenges, from rampant debris to water damage, and came together to aid in the repair of their base and the surrounding community.
You’ll also read about the Hurricane Hunters who chase storms, like Katrina, from the air in a WC-130J Super Hercules. Their mission is to gauge the potential impact of each hurricane in order to help give early warning and hopefully prevent the future loss of lives.
Finally, we follow the journey of a pararescueman hoping to reconnect with a little girl that he rescued from the floods in New Orleans.
You can download Airman magazine’s September issue for your tablet here:AppleAndroid
No tablet? View it in your web browser by clicking here.September issue 



Hurricane Katrina 



Airman magazine
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Leah Nivison, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D

required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on

Form 10-K of the GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2011-GC5 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a

whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to

state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of

the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading

with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other

information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered

by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in

this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in

the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their

obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for

asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment

of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required

to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB

and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to

this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material

instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in

this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information

provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator, U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, and National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant.

 

 

 

Dated: March 26, 2020

 

 

/s/ Leah Nivison

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
IB 

Union Calendar No. 17 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1126 

[Report No. 110–41] 

To reauthorize the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and Technology 

Competitiveness Act of 1988. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. LIPINSKI (for himself and Mr. EHLERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Science and Technology 

MARCH 8, 2007 

Additional sponsors: Mr. AKIN, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr. COSTELLO, Ms. SUTTON, Mr. ALTMIRE, Mr. WILSON of Ohio, 

and Mr. HOLDEN

MARCH 8, 2007 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation 

and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1126 RH

1 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS. 

2 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

3 9 of the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and 

4 Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988 (15 U.S.C. 

5 5108) is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 9. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

7 ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sec8 retary to carry out this Act $12,000,000 for each of the 

9 fiscal years 2008 through 2012.’’. 

10 (b) STEEL PROJECT PRIORITIES.—Section 4(c)(1) of 

11 the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and Tech12 nology Competitiveness Act of 1988 (15 U.S.C. 

13 5103(c)(1)) is amended— 

14 (1) in subparagraph (H), by striking ‘‘coatings 

15 for sheet steels’’ and inserting ‘‘sheet and bar 

16 steels’’; and 

17 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub18 paragraph: 

19 ‘‘(K) The development of technologies 

20 which reduce greenhouse gas emissions.’’. 

21 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The Steel and 

22 Aluminum Energy Conservation and Technology Competi23 tiveness Act of 1988 is further amended— 

24 (1) by striking section 7 (15 U.S.C. 5106); and 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HR 1126 RH

1 (2) in section 8 (15 U.S.C. 5107), by inserting 

2 ‘‘, beginning with fiscal year 2008,’’ after ‘‘close of 

3 each fiscal year’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

Union Calendar No. 17 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1126 

[Report No. 110

–41] 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Steel and Aluminum Energy 

Act of 1988. Conservation and Technology Competitiveness 

MARCH 8, 2007 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 123 

AN ACT 

To authorize appropriations for the San Gabriel Basin 

Restoration Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 123 EH

1 SECTION 1. SAN GABRIEL BASIN RESTORATION FUND. 

2 Section 110 of division B of the Miscellaneous Appro3 priations Act, 2001 (114 Stat. 2763A–222), as enacted 

4 into law by section 1(a)(4) of the Consolidated Appropria5 tions Act, 2001 (Public Law 106–554, as amended by 

6 Public Law 107-66), is further amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)(3)(B), by inserting after 

8 clause (iii) the following: 

9 ‘‘(iv) NON-FEDERAL MATCH.—After 

10 $85,000,000 has cumulatively been appro11 priated under subsection (d)(1), the re12 mainder of Federal funds appropriated 

13 under subsection (d) shall be subject to the 

14 following matching requirement: 

15 ‘‘(I) SAN GABRIEL BASIN WATER

16 QUALITY AUTHORITY.—The San Ga17 briel Basin Water Quality Authority 

18 shall be responsible for providing a 35 

19 percent non-Federal match for Fed20 eral funds made available to the Au21 thority under this Act. 

22 ‘‘(II) CENTRAL BASIN MUNICIPAL

23 WATER DISTRICT.—The Central Basin 

24 Municipal Water District shall be re25 sponsible for providing a 35 percent 

26 non-Federal match for Federal funds 
3 

•HR 123 EH

1 made available to the District under 

2 this Act.’’; 

3 (2) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the 

4 following: 

5 ‘‘(4) INTEREST ON FUNDS IN RESTORATION

6 FUND.—No amounts appropriated above the cumu7 lative amount of $85,000,000 to the Restoration 

8 Fund under subsection (d)(1) shall be invested by 

9 the Secretary of the Treasury in interest-bearing se10 curities of the United States.’’; and 

11 (3) by amending subsection (d) to read as fol12 lows: 

13 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

14 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be 

15 appropriated to the Restoration Fund established 

16 under subsection (a) $146,200,000. Such funds shall 

17 remain available until expended. 

18 ‘‘(2) SET-ASIDE.—Of the amounts appropriated 

19 under paragraph (1), no more than $21,200,000 
4 

•HR 123 EH

1 shall be made available to carry out the Central 

2 Basin Water Quality Project.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 123 

AN ACT 

To authorize appropriations for the San Gabriel 

Basin Restoration Fund.
News United States Air Force
 Summer safety begins with risk managementPublished May 21, 2015
                        
                        By Air Force Safety Center Public Affairs
                **KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE, N.M. (AFNS) --**
                Increased travel and leisure activities go hand in hand with the summer months, and require increased emphasis on risk management, said Bill Parsons, the Air Force chief of ground safetyWhile Airmen and their families make the most of recreational opportunities during the summer, the period between Memorial Day and Labor Day weekends is the most important time to incorporate risk management in off-duty leisure activities. This is accomplished by using the same safety processes as those used on duty, Parsons said."Unfortunately, that same period ended last year with 17 fatalities," Parsons said. "We need every Airman to commit to making that number zero this year, and we do that by using the same risk management skills we apply on the job to ensure everyone returns safely at summer's end and ready to accomplish the mission. Summer safety is the extension of our ‘Quest for Zero’ mishaps."Whether traveling, participating in water activities, sporting events or cookouts, Airmen should identify, assess and mitigate all risks to include: trip planning that ensures enough rest and preparation for contingencies, no alcohol while driving or participating in recreational activities, and use of appropriate protective gear in all activities."Most mishaps are preventable," Parsons said, "and mishap prevention requires doing the right thing. Sometimes the right thing is as simple as stepping up and stepping in when we see something that doesn't look right. That alone can avert a potential disaster."Kirtland AFB 



Air Force Safety Center 



AFSC 



Quest for Zero 



mishaps 



safety
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**EXCHANGE
      ACT RULE 15D-14(B) AND**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation
      (the ”Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Robert Y. Lee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b)
      and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
      Oxley Act of 2002, that:





i.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





ii.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation and will
      be
      retained by U.S. Dry Cleaning Corporation. and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








By:
            /S/
                ROBERT Y.
                LEEName:
            Robert
                Y. LeeTitle:
            Chief
                Executive OfficerDate:
            February
                14, 2007