alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Enliven Marketing Technologies Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Patrick Vogt and Christopher C. Duignan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify,
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

|   
|---
|(1)
|   
|(2)

|                       |  |  |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 11, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ PATRICKVOGT                                  
|                       |  |  |  | Patrick VogtPresident and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |  |  |                                                  
|Dated: August 11, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ CHRISTOPHERC. DUIGNAN                        
|                       |  |  |  | Christopher C. DuignanChief Financial Officer    



---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23587]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Notice of Meeting of the Committee of Chairs of the Industry 
Trade Advisory Committees (ITACs)

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice of a partially opened meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee of Chairs of the Industry Trade Advisory 
Committees (ITACs) will hold a meeting on Tuesday, October 12, 2010, 
from 9:30 a.m. to 12:15 p.m. The meeting will be closed to the public 
from 9:30 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. and opened to the public from 11:30 a.m. 
to 12:15 p.m.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for October 12, 2010, unless otherwise 
notified.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 
Room 4830, located at 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ingrid Mitchem, Designated Federal 
Officer for ITAC Committee of Chairs, (202) 482-3268, Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Agenda for the open portion of the 
meeting will be a Discussion and Deliberation on the Draft Report of 
the ITAC Committee of Chairs on the Appropriate Scope of Viewpoints to 
be Represented on the Industry Trade Advisory Committees (ITACs). The 
Agenda for the closed portion of the meeting will be the Trade Policy 
Agenda, including discussion of ongoing negotiations and trade 
strategies.

Myesha Ward,
Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Intergovernmental Affairs and 
Public Engagement.
[FR Doc. 2010-23587 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-W0-P
#### Houston Cotton Exchange, etc., et al., v. Jerr*y*Crawley.

(No. 1963.)

Appeal from Harris County.

Hutcheson’ & Carrington, counsel for appellants.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§138. *Lien of mechanic, etc.; how fixed; itemized account not necessary, when; case stated.*Appellee Crawley claims that in March, 1884, he contracted with one Max Kosse, the other defendant in this suit, to do the lathing and plastering of the building that he (Kosse) was constructing for the Houston Cotton Exchange and Board of Trade. That Kosse owed him $2,787 for the *176work and materials, less $1,050 paid up to February 2, 1885, on which day he made out and delivered to the appellant “an attested account of the amount and value of said labor and materials performed and furnished, and remaining unpaid.” That at that time appellant owed Kosse, on his contract with it for the construction of said building, more than sufficient to pay the amount due appellee. That Kosse, on March 4, 1885, paid appellee $1,341.50, leaving due the $395.50 sued for, and for which appellant’s liability is claimed to have been fixed by the steps recited. Appellant answered by general denial and general demurrer. The general demurrer was overruled, and judgment rendered for appellee against both defendants for the amount sued for and costs. It is assigned that the court erred in overruling the general demurrer. *Held:*The petition sets out the account served on appellant without itemization or separation of work from materials. The petition appears to be based upon an express contract, for an entire job for a sum certain. This being the case, it was unnecessary to set forth each item of work and material, in order to comply with the statute. [Pool v. Wedemeyer, 56 Tex. 287.]

March 13, 1886.

§ 1 39. *General demurrer; defects not reached by.*But concede that it is doubtful whether the petition declares upon an express, contract for an entire job for a sum certain, and that the account should have been itemized, the defect is of a character that cannot be reached by general demurrer; for if there had been special exceptions to the petition pointing out such defect, the plaintiff could, and no doubt would have cured the defect by a proper amendment.

Affirmed.
#### Joe OLIVER, et al. v. MAGNOLIA CLINIC, et al.

No. 2010-C-2785.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 2011.

ORDER

Vacated and remanded. La. Const. Art. V, § 8(B) provides that a “majority of the judges sitting in a case must concur to render judgment.” The court of appeal’s decree does not reflect a majority judgment on the principal issues considered in the instant case.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, the ruling of the court of appeal is vacated. It is further ordered that this matter be considered *en banc*so that a decree can be rendered reflecting a majority vote on each of the issues presented.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Tamer Husseini, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Celeritek, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Celeritek, Inc.

| |  |        |  |                         |  | 
| |  | ------ |  | ----------------------- |  | 
| |  | By:    |  | /s/ TAMER HUSSEINI      |  | 
| |  |        |  |                         |  | 
| |  | Name:  |  | Tamer Husseini          |  | 
| |  |        |  |                         |  | 
| |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 

I, Margaret E. Smith, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Celeritek, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Celeritek, Inc.

| |  |        |  |                         |  | 
| |  | ------ |  | ----------------------- |  | 
| |  | By:    |  | /s/ MARGARET E. SMITH   |  | 
| |  |        |  |                         |  | 
| |  | Name:  |  | Margaret E. Smith       |  | 
| |  |        |  |                         |  | 
| |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 

34
#### THEODORE LENCZYK *v.*VINCENT SABATINI

(AC 23156)

Foti, Bishop and Dupont, Js.

Submitted on briefs March 21

officially released April 15, 2003

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF
HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED FOR THE TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED MARCH 26, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-24-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-26-2000
<CASH>                                     110,520,000
<SECURITIES>                               129,022,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               48,462,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 5,667,000
<INVENTORY>                                 39,918,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           351,284,000
<PP&E>                                     614,565,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             307,627,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             697,403,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       64,720,000
<BONDS>                                    213,587,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       248,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 412,729,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               697,403,000
<SALES>                                    234,760,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           234,760,000
<CGS>                                      222,335,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              222,335,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,178,000<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,109,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,489,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (69,694,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (17,424,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (52,270,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (52,270,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    ($2.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($2.11)
<FN>
<F1>Other Expenses reflect research and development expenses.
</FN>


</TABLE>
582 A.2d 1003

#### IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH R. GIANNINI, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

December 7, 1990.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court on the application of JOSEPH R. GIANNINI, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion to vacate the Order of March 20, 1990, is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that JOSEPH R. GIANNINI show cause on January 14, 1991, at 2:00 p.m., in the Supreme Court Courtroom Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, why he should not be publicly reprimanded or otherwise disciplined for violations of *RPC*3.5 and *RPC*8.4; and it is fürther

ORDERED that respondent shall serve and file any supplemental brief on or before January 3, 1991, and the Office of Attorney Ethics may respond on or before January 10, 1991; and it is further

ORDERED that David E. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, or his designee, present this matter to the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,672
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     22,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,257
<PP&E>                                          10,638
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,913
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,537
<OTHER-SE>                                         359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,331
<SALES>                                         39,997
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,758
<CGS>                                           24,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,356
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,873
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59
        

</TABLE>
#### Katherine A. RICHEY o/b/o John Coogan Richey, Sr. v. TLC PROPERTIES, INC.

No. CM 11-1304.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Dec. 7, 2011.

James Edward Burks, Attorney at Law, Lake Charles, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant, Katherine A. Richey o/b/o John C. Richey, Sr.

Joseph Richard Pousson, Jr., Plauehé, Smith & Nieset, Lake Charles, LA, for Defendant Appellee, TLC Properties, Inc.

Court composed of OSWALD A. DECUIR, BILLY H. EZELL, and J. DAVID PAINTER, Judges.

DECUIR, Judge.

LThe Defendant-Appellee, TLC Properties, Inc., moves to remand and dismiss this unlodged devolutive appeal, on the ground that the Appellant is without the right, standing or capacity to proceed with this appeal. For the reasons given herein, we grant the motion to remand and preter-mit discussion of the motion to dismiss.

Trial in this matter was held on August 2, 2011. The trial court issued a judgment in favor of the Defendant, dismissing all of Plaintiffs claims with prejudice. The trial court signed a written judgment on August 19, 2011. The Plaintiff filed her motion and order for appeal, and the order granting a devolutive appeal was signed by the trial court on October 3, 2011.

In the Defendant’s motion to remand/dismiss the Plaintiffs unlodged de-volutive appeal, the Defendant claims that Plaintiffs power of attorney was rescinded on August 1, 2011, by John C. Richey, Sr. Therefore, the Defendant contends that the Plaintiff is not the proper party to proceed with this appeal on behalf of John C. Richey, Sr. The Defendant moves this court to remand this matter to the trial court and, following an evidentiary hearing, to dismiss this appeal pursuant to La.Code Civ.P. art. 2162.

We find that this matter should be remanded to the trial court because the consideration of the merits of this motion requires evidence which cannot be received by this court. Thus, in accordance *1248with La.Code Civ.P. art. 2164, this court hereby remands this matter in order for the trial court to hold a contradictory evi-dentiary hearing regarding the Plaintiffs right to proceed with this appeal. We further pretermit discussion of the Defendant’s motion to dismiss appeal at this time.

MOTION TO REMAND GRANTED.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Strasbaugh (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge:
  1.           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2.           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:  August 15, 2010
By:
/s/ ALAN STRASBAUGHAlan StrasbaughPresident and Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)Dated:  August 15, 2010
By:
/s/ RICHARD NANCERichard NanceChief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)
  
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1202 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit an authorized committee of a winning candidate for election for Federal office 

which received a personal loan from the candidate from making any 

repayment on the loan after the date on which the candidate begins 

serving in such office. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2007 

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania (for himself, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. CARTER) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

prohibit an authorized committee of a winning candidate 

for election for Federal office which received a personal 

loan from the candidate from making any repayment 

on the loan after the date on which the candidate begins 

serving in such office. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Personal Account5 ability in Campaign Committees Act’’. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1202 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING REPAYMENT OF CANDIDATE PER2 SONAL LOANS AFTER DATE ON WHICH CAN3 DIDATE BEGINS SERVING IN ELECTED OF4 FICE. 

5 Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act 

6 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(k) LIMITATIONS ON REPAYMENT OF PERSONAL

9 LOANS MADE BY CANDIDATE TO COMMITTEE.—An au10 thorized committee of a winning candidate for an election 

11 for Federal office occurring after December 2007 which 

12 received a personal loan from the candidate may not make 

13 any repayment with respect to such loan on or after the 

14 date on which the candidate begins serving in the office.’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF CVF TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

1.    SRE Controls Inc
2.    Dantec Corporation
3.    Biorem Technologies Inc.
4.    Gemprint(TM)Corporation
5.    Ecoval Corporation
6.    CVF Capital Management Corporation
7.    CVF Technologies International, Inc.
8.    Eastview Marketing One LLC
9.    Grand Island Marketing Two LLC
10.   Grand Island Marketing Inc.
11.   Petrozyme Technologies Inc.
12.   IMT Systems Inc.
13.   RDM Corporation
14.   TurboSonic Technologies, Inc.
15.   WZ.COM INC.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 12314 and # 12315]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Wisconsin dated 09/13/2010. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         08/10/2010 through  08/14/2010.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         09/13/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/12/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/13/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Saint Croix. *Contiguous Counties:* Wisconsin: Barron, Dunn, Pierce, Polk. Minnesota: Washington. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.000Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000For Economic Injury:Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12314 B and for economic injury is 12315 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Wisconsin; Minnesota. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: September 13, 2010. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2010-23533 Filed 9-20-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
758 A.2d 1177

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Lebron Terrance THOMAS, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued Sept. 12, 2000.

Decided Oct. 2, 2000.

Michael W. Streily, Pittsburgh, for Com. of Pennsylvania.

Marjorie A. Minkler, Pittsburgh, M. Susan Ruffner, Pittsburgh, for L. Thomas.

Peter Rosalsky, Philadelphia, for amicus curiae Defender Ass’n of Philadelphia.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

*188Justice NEWMAN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Justice CASTILLE dissents and would reach the merits of the case.