alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of Meade Instruments Corp., a Delaware corporation
 Name of Subsidiary
    
    JurisdictionMeade Instruments Holding Corp.
    
    CaliforniaMeade Instruments Mexico, S. de R. L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoMeade Coronado Holdings Corp.
    
    CaliforniaCoronado Instruments, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaMTSC Holdings, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaSimmons Outdoor Corp.
    
    DelawareMC Holdings, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaMeade Instruments (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaMeade Instruments Europe Corp.
    
    CaliforniaMeade Instruments Verwaltungs GmbH
    
    GermanyMeade Instruments Europe GmbH & Co. KG
    
    GermanyMeade Instruments Foreign Sales Corporation Limited
    
    Jamaica
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1034 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1034

  To amend the National Guard Youth Challenge Program under title 32, 
United States Code, to exclude nondefense funds made available by other 
Federal agencies for the Program from the matching requirements of the 
                                Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2007

     Mr. Wilson of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Mr. 
 Etheridge, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Holt, Mr. Saxton, Mr. Pastor, 
  Mr. Melancon, Mr. LaHood, and Mr. Spratt) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the National Guard Youth Challenge Program under title 32, 
United States Code, to exclude nondefense funds made available by other 
Federal agencies for the Program from the matching requirements of the 
                                Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FOR STATE PROGRAMS UNDER THE NATIONAL 
              GUARD YOUTH CHALLENGE PROGRAM.

    (a) Federal Share of Costs of State Programs.--Subsection (d) of 
section 509 of title 32, United States Code, is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(d) Department of Defense Share of State Program Costs.--The 
amount of assistance provided under this section to a State program of 
the Program for a fiscal year using funds appropriated directly to the 
Secretary of Defense may not exceed 60 percent of the costs of 
operating the State program during that year. However, nondefense funds 
made available or transferred to the Secretary of Defense by other 
Federal agencies to support the Program or provided directly by other 
Federal agencies in support of the Program shall not be subject to the 
matching-funds requirement imposed by the preceding sentence.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--For fiscal year 2008, there 
is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Defense 
$97,527,200 to carry out the National Guard Youth Challenge Program 
under section 509 of title 32, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
```

  EX-35.1
(logo) MIDLAND    (logo) PNC
       LOAN              REAL ESTATE
       SERVICES

OFFICER CERTIFICATE

WF-RBS Commercial Mortgage Trust
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2011-C5

March 1, 2012

Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of PNC Bank, National
Association d/b/a Midland Loan Services as successor by merger to Midland Loan
Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"),
(i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the calendar year 2011 (the
"Reporting Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under the undersigned officer's supervision;
(ii) to the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period or, if there has been a
failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such
failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are
set forth below; and
(iii) the Servicer has not received any notice during the Reporting Period
regarding qualification, or challenging the status, of any REMIC formed pursuant
to the Agreement from the IRS or any other governmental agency or body.

Nature and Status of Failures: None.

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCATION
d/ba MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES

/s/ Steven W. Smith
Steven W. Smith
Executive Vice President

Member of The PNC Financial Services Group
10851 Mastin Boulevard Overland Park, Kansas 66210
800-327-8083
www.pnc.com/midland
```
News United States Air Force
 AF selects 3 captains for prestigious PhD programPublished Sept. 2, 2015
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Ian M. Hoachlander
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Three officers were selected for the 2015 Chief of Staff of the Air Force Captains Prestigious PhD Program.
Selectees include Capts. Bradley R. Dewees, from the U.S. Air Force Academy; Jason M. Rathje, who is assigned to Air Force Materiel Command; and Benjamin D. Schaftel from Air Mobility Command.
Officers selected for the program may pursue studies in history, political science, international relations, economics, philosophy, international business relations, international security studies or political systems and theories.
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to the myPers website. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following instructions on the Air Force Retirees Services website.U.S. Air Force Academy 



Air Force Materiel Command 



Air Mobility Command 



Chief of Staff of the Air Force Captains Prestigious PhD Program
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1130 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to extend the authority 

to withhold from public availability a financial disclosure report filed 

by an individual who is a judicial officer or judicial employee, to the 

extent necessary to protect the safety of that individual or a family 

member of that individual, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. CONYERS (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of 

California, Mr. CANNON, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. FORBES, and Mr. 

GOODLATTE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to extend 

the authority to withhold from public availability a financial disclosure report filed by an individual who is a 

judicial officer or judicial employee, to the extent necessary to protect the safety of that individual or a family 

member of that individual, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Judicial Disclosure Re5 sponsibility Act’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1130 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF FAMILY MEMBERS. 

2 Section 105(b)(3) of the Ethics in Government Act 

3 of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended— 

4 (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘or a 

5 family member of that individual’’ after ‘‘that indi6 vidual’’; and 

7 (2) in subparagraph (B)(i), by inserting ‘‘or a 

8 family member of that individual’’ after ‘‘the re9 port’’. 

10 SEC. 3. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE REPORTS. 

11 (a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 105(b)(3) 

12 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) 

13 is amended by striking ‘‘2005’’ each place that term ap14 pears and inserting ‘‘2009’’. 

15 (b) REPORT CONTENTS.—Section 105(b)(3)(C) of 

16 the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) 

17 is amended— 

18 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

19 (2) in clause (iii), by striking the period at the 

20 end and inserting a semicolon; and 

21 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

22 ‘‘(iv) the nature or type of information re23 dacted; 

24 ‘‘(v) what steps or procedures are in place to 

25 ensure that sufficient information is available to liti26 gants to determine if there is a conflict of interest; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HR 1130 IH

1 ‘‘(vi) principles used to guide implementation of 

2 redaction authority; and 

3 ‘‘(vii) any public complaints received relating to 

4 redaction.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
#### IN THE MATTER OF JAMES A. LAFFERTY, COUNTY CORRECTION SERGEANT, ESSEX COUNTY.

March 13, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5742]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Poshard] is recognized for 5 minutes.
  [Mr. POSHARD addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

I,
John B. Bartling, Jr., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
April 30, 2013

/s/ John B. Bartling, Jr. John B. Bartling, Jr. Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                          98,161
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,095,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                   153,281
<INVENTORY>                                  9,654,678
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,879,320
<PP&E>                                      18,474,051
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,911,359
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,236,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,510,592
<BONDS>                                      7,254,801
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,586
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,561,308
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,236,287
<SALES>                                     12,706,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,706,125
<CGS>                                       10,395,937
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,511,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                31,251
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             227,045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                977,686
<INCOME-TAX>                                   312,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            665,686
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   665,686
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
Remuneration letter dated 11/11/2003



 Exhibit 4.7 
  

[Telecom Logo] 
  
 11 November 2003 
  
 Theresa Gattung 

Chief Executive Officer 
 Telecom New Zealand Limited 
 PO Box 570 
 WELLINGTON 
  
 Dear Theresa, 
  
 VARIATION TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS 
  
 Further to my letter dated 19 August 2003 and following the relevant shareholder approvals being obtained at the recent Annual General Meeting, I confirm the following
changes to your terms and conditions as set out in your individual employment agreement with Telecom dated 10 August 1999 (“your contract”). 
  
 REMUNERATION AND BENEFITS 
  
 Your Total Base Remuneration in clause 3.2 of your contract will be increased to $1,000,000 gross per annum, with effect from 1 July 2003. 
  
 VARIABLE PERFORMANCE PAYMENT 
  
 The Board has agreed that you will no longer participate in the Telecom EVA Incentive Plan
under clause 4 of your contract and you will instead participate in the Performance Incentive Scheme, with effect 1 July 2003. The rules governing the operation of the Performance Incentive Scheme are set out in the attached Performance Incentive
Scheme Rules. The Board reserves the right, subject to and in accordance with the Performance Incentive Scheme Rules to cancel or amend this Scheme at any time, in its sole discretion. 
  
 The target value with effect from 1 July 2003 is $1,000,000 per annum. 
  
 SHARE OPTIONS 
  
 The Board has agreed that with effect from 1 July 2003 you will no longer participate in the Telecom Executive Option Scheme under clause 6 of your contract, and you will
instead participate in the Performance Option Scheme. The allocation of any share options under the Performance Option Scheme is made at the sole discretion of the Board and is subject to decision by the Board each year. The rules governing the
Performance Option Scheme are set out in the Performance Option Scheme Rules attached. The Board reserves the right, subject to and in accordance with the Performance Option Scheme Rules to cancel or amend this Scheme at any time, in its sole
discretion. 
  









 Effective 19 September 2003, the Board have determined to allocated to you 500,000 options under the Performance Option
Scheme. 
  
 OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS 
  
 The above terms vary clauses 3, 4 and 6 of your contract and are deemed to be included in
clause 13.3 of your contract. All other terms and conditions as set out in your contract remain unchanged and in force and effect. 
  

	Yours sincerely
	
	/s/    RODERICK DEANE        
	

	 Roderick Deane
 Chairman


  
 I, Theresa Elizabeth Gattung,
understand and accept the conditions of employment set out in this variation to my Contract and I confirm my acceptance of these terms and conditions. 
  

	
	/s/    THERESA E GATTUNG        
	

	Theresa E Gattung

  
 Date 15 November 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Land O'Lakes, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 27, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Daniel Knutson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



                                     By:  /s/ Daniel Knutson
                                        -------------------------------
                                            Daniel Knutson
                                            Senior Vice President
                                            and Chief Financial Officer
News United States Air Force
 AF Combat Ammunition Center: Stepping stone for munitions leadersPublished Oct. 16, 2014
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Ramon A. Adelan
                        
                        
                        9th Reconnaissance Wing Public Affairs
                **BEALE AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFNS) --**
                When the Department of Defense needs ammunition Airmen trained for mission readiness, they call Beale Air Force Base, California, to carry out the task.
Beale AFB is the home of the Air Force Combat Ammunition Center, or AFCOMAC, which provides the Air Force munitions community with advanced training in mass combat ammunition planning and production techniques.
"We are very unique; we are the only school house in the Department of Defense that does this," said Master Sgt. John Shaw, the 9th Munitions Squadron AFCOMAC planning superintendent. "AFCOMAC is the only place you are able to receive this type of training. It is so unique we have accommodated other branches to participate in the class."
AFCOMAC is a school for senior airmen and above to receive upgrade training. Eight classes are held each year, consisting of 70 students per class training for three weeks.Classes consist of personnel from each rank and is divided up into three teams. The teams work as they would in an operational environment.
"Our students come from across the Air Force and have three weeks to learn the academics, the builds, and put them in the field for the Iron Flag exercise, which is the final portion of the course," Shaw said. "It's a huge leadership challenge to bring students together with their strengths and weaknesses."
The students are required to build approximately 1,000 bombs in three and a half days during Iron Flag. The exercise simulates an order of munitions, which has to be assembled, inspected, and delivered to a simulated aircraft for loading.
"Students get to see all the different ammunition configurations here," said Tech. Sgt. Benjamin Adam, the 9th Munitions Squadron AFCOMAC combat advisor. "Every aircraft has different configuration. Their fins are aligned differently, accessories can vary for the bomb rack, and there are a lot of little nuances with aircraft that require a lot of attention to detail."
Iron Flag tests the students' abilities to assemble their work pad, follow their created plan of execution, meet order numbers, time and quality, and repack the work pad. The AFCOMAC cadre evaluates each team throughout the exercise.
"We tell them when they arrive; this is the most challenging exercise they will face while they are in the Air Force," Shaw said. "Executing this monster of a mission is a challenge, but we prepare them to execute and complete the mission. Students will go back to their duty stations as leaders in the career field and be ready for real-world objectives from the training they received while at AFCOMAC."California 



ammunitions 



training 



Beale AFB
#### STATE EX REL. THEODORE QUALE v. GUY A. PENNEY.1

November 21, 1919.

No. 21,550.

Appeal from order upon motion for judgment upon pleadings dismissed.

In ordinary actions no appeal lies from an order granting or denying a motion for judgment upon pleadings. The same rule *held*to govern when application is made for a writ of mandamu^. [Reporter.]

*464Upon the relation of Theo. Quale the district court for Pennington county-granted its alternative writ of mandamus directed to Guy A,. Penney, as mayor of the -city of Thief River Falls, directing him to sign warrants issued by the city clerk of that city to petitioner in payment of his salary as city attorney for the months of January, February and 'March, 1919, and permit the same to be delivered to petitioner, or show cause why he had not done |so. From an order, Grindeland, J., granting respondent’s motion for judgment upon the pleadings, -denying a peremptory writ and dismissing the petition and alternative writ, petitioner appealed.

Appeal dismissed.

*C. G. Dosland, O.*A. *Naplin*and *Theo. Quale,*for appellant.

*E. M. Stanton,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 174 N. W. 611.

Per Curiam.

The respondent in this a mandamus proceeding moved for judgment on the pleadings. The court filed an order granting the motion and directing judgment to be entered accordingly. Relator appeals from the order. No judgment has been entered. The order is not appealable. In ordinary actions no appeal lies from an order granting or denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings. It is not perceived why a different rule should obtain as to like orders in mandamus proceedings.

The appeal is dismissed.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Aug. 26Published Aug. 26, 2016
                        
                        By Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- In this look around the Air Force, F-35 Lightning IIs face decontamination testing and the investigation of an F-16 Fighting Falcon crash in Germany concludes. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Traci Keller.
For previous episodes, click here for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- F-35 prepared to undergo chemical, biological decontamination testing
- PRESS RELEASE: Air Force releases investigation results on F-16C crashF-35 



decontamination 



Germany 



crash 



f-16 



FYI 



GI Bill 



ATAF