alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM APPLICABLE
1997 INTERIM FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF CORECOMM  INCORPORATED.  THE  SCHEDULE IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            73,730,000
<SECURITIES>                                      10,255,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                     25,377,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (3,421,000)
<INVENTORY>                                        7,502,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   9,340,000
<PP&E>                                           165,330,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (45,181,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   411,001,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             41,110,000
<BONDS>                                          200,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             135,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       160,161,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     411,001,000
<SALES>                                            7,663,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  75,709,000
<CGS>                                              9,073,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     17,301,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  36,478,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 9,061,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    3,276,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (1,345,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                1,931,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (3,842,000)
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1,911,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (0.15)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.15)<F1>

<FN>
<F1>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE ADOPTION OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
    STANDARDS NO.128, "EARNINGS PER SHARE"
</FN>

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5684]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Florida [Mr. Goss] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. GOSS addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
#### G. H. & S. A. R’y Co. v. N. H. Morris.

(No. 1062, Op. Book No. 2, p. 314.)

Appeal from Colorado County.

February 16, 1881.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 777. *Account; meaning of, as used in art. 2266, Rev. Slat.*This suit was brought by appellee against appellant on an account for injuries and damages amounting to $172.50, occasioned to appellee’s property by the acts of appellant. The account was verified by appellee’s affidavit in accordance with article 2263 o£ the Revised Statutes, and on the trial of the case appellee was permitted, over appellant’s objection, to read the account in evidence, and no other evidence except the account was adduced by appellee, and upon this evidence alone judgment was rendered in his favor for the full amount of his claim. *Held:*The cause of action was a tort, and not the subject of an account within the meaning of the above cited provision of the statute. The plaintiff’s affidavit added nothing to its force or weight as evidence, and did not dispense with proving it *aliunde.*In and of itself, it did not make out-a *prima facie*case, or in fact any case. [H. & T. C. R’y Co. v. Hays & Co. *ante,*p. 416.] The judgment of the court below is without evidence to support it.

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5087]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         THE REPUBLICAN BUDGET

  (Mr. BROWN of Ohio asked and was given permission to address the 
House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. BROWN of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, country and western singer Jerry Reed 
must have had the Republican budget in mind when he sang, ``She got the 
gold mine and I got the shaft.''
  The proposed budget which the Congress will vote on today will give 
the gold mine to wealthy special interests while America's elderly who 
depend upon Medicare and depend upon Social Security get the shaft.
  The Republican budget cuts Medicare by $283 billion over 7 years, 
slashing Medicare spending by 25 percent. Out-of-pocket costs for 
seniors will increase by over $1,000 in 2002 and $3,500 over 7 years.
  My constituents have not been asking me to raise the cost of their 
health care to provide tax breaks for the wealthy and to escalate cold 
war spending. The budget also cuts Medicaid by $180 billion over 7 
years and cuts Social Security benefits by $24 billion between 1999 and 
2002, all to pay for tax cuts for the rich.
  Mr. Speaker, why are Republicans cutting Medicare to pay for tax cuts 
for the privileged few?

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                  0000919601
<NAME> VENDALUX CORP
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,323
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,274
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,418)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  45
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (45)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (45)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (45)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.53(f)(12) 
  
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of January 22, 2003, by and between PriceSmart,
Inc., a Delaware Corporation (“Employer”) and Edward Oats (“Executive”). 
  
 Recitals 
  

	A)	On January 11, 2000 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive. 

  

	B)	Effective as of November 1, 2000, Executive’s annual base salary was increased to $115,000. 

  

	C)	On January 24, 2001, a First Amendment to Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive. 

  

	D)	Pursuant to a Memorandum dated October 16, 2001, Executive’s Annual Base Salary was increased to $142,000, effective as of September 1, 2001. 

  

	E)	On January 16, 2002, a Second Amendment to Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive. 

  

	F)	On November 19, 2002, a Third Amendment to Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive. 

  

	G)	Employer and Executive now desire to further amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow: 

  
 Agreement 
  

	1.	Section 3.1 of the Agreement which provides: 

  
 3.1 Term. The term of Executive’s employment hereunder shall commence on March 31, 2000 and shall continue until March 31, 2003 unless sooner
terminated or extended as hereinafter provided. 
  
 is hereby
amended, effective January 22, 2003, to provide as follows: 
  
 3.1 Term. The term of Executive’s employment hereunder shall commence on March 31, 2000 and shall continue until March 31, 2004 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided. 








	2.	All other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain unaltered and fully effective. 

  
 Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above. 
  

	 EXECUTIVE
	 	 EMPLOYER

		
	 	 	 PRICESMART, INC.

		
	 Edward Oats
	 	 By: /s/ ROBERT M. GANS


		
	 /s/ EDWARD OATS

	 	 Name: Robert M. Gans


		
	 	 	 Its: Executive Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2955 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2955

       To revise the Inland Waterways Trust Fund financing rate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 20, 2014

 Mr. Casey (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Harkin, and 
 Mr. Franken) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To revise the Inland Waterways Trust Fund financing rate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVISION TO THE INLAND WATERWAYS TRUST FUND FINANCING RATE.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 4042(b)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(A) The Inland Waterways Trust Fund financing 
                rate is 29 cents per gallon.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to uses during calendar quarters beginning more than 60 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THIS FORM
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         764,925
<SECURITIES>                                    38,135
<RECEIVABLES>                                  138,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,512
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               971,377
<PP&E>                                          43,971
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,813
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,258,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          235,533
<BONDS>                                        572,484
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           361
<OTHER-SE>                                     444,458
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,258,841
<SALES>                                        292,855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               464,410
<CGS>                                            6,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  464,087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,312
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    323
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,917
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,574)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,574)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
<FN>
<F1>For purposes of this exhibit, primary means basic.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Kammins et al. *v.*Buschmann

[No. 19,438.

Filed May 6, 1960.]

*535
      *Stanley Talesnick, Ruckelshaus, O’Connor & Ruckelshaus*and *John O’Connor,*all of Indianapolis, for appellants.

*Henry M. Coombs*and *John A. Carson,*both of Indianapolis, for appellee.

Bierly, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Marion County, Room No. 1, wherein it reversed a decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Indianapolis.

Appellee has filed a confession of errors in which he states that the court erred in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial and in overruling the demurrer of certain appellants to appellee’s petition for a writ of certiorari.

This cause is therefore reversed, and the trial court is ordered to sustain appellants’ motion for new trial. *Gross*v. *Sipusic*(1935), 101 Ind. App. 700, 9 N. E. 2d 365; *Indianapolis Telephone Co.*v. *State*(1919), 188 Ind. 724, 123 N. E. 401.

Myers, C. J., and Ryan, J., not participating.

Note. — Reported in 166 N. E. 2d 654.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5186]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          EXTENSION OF REMARKS

  By unanimous consent, permission to revise and extend remarks was 
granted to:
  The following Members (at the request of Ms. Pelosi) and to include 
extraneous matter:
  Mr. Ackerman.
  Mr. Stark in two instances.
  Mr. Neal of Massachusetts.
  Mr. Coleman.
  Mr. Johnson of South Dakota.
  Mrs. Kennelly.
  Mr. Schumer.
  Mr. Lipinski.
  Mr. Rose.
  Mrs. Maloney in three instances.
  Mr. Stupak.
  Ms. Waters.
  Mr. LaFalce.
  Mr. Kanjorski.
  Mr. Bishop.
  Ms. Slaughter.
  Mr. Bonior.
  Mr. Coleman.
  Ms. Furse.
  Ms. Velazquez.
  (The following Members (at the request of Mr. Solomon) and to include 
extraneous matter:)
  Mr. Packard.
  Mr. Martini in two instances.
  Mr. Moorhead.
  Mr. Shaw in two instances.
  Mrs. Chenoweth.
  Mr. Schiff in two instances.
  Mr. Smith of New Jersey.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32


                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the filing by Aries Ventures
Inc. (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2003
(the "Report"), the undersigned does hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                          /s/ ROBERT N. WEINGARTEN
Date:  February 12, 2004             By:  ___________________________
                                          Robert N. Weingarten
                                          President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
#### Will Stone et als. v. Stumper, Sheriff of Maverick County.

(No. 231, Op. Book No. 1, p. 423.)

Appeal from Maverick County.

Opinion by

White, J.

§ 324. *Taxation, exemption from.*The thirteenth legislature passed an act releasing certain taxes to the several counties therein named, for two years. [Gen. Laws 13th Leg. pp. 59, GO.] Injunction was sued out to restrain the sheriff of Maverick county from collecting the taxes under said exemption. On motion of the district attorney, the injunction was dissolved, upon the ground that the act of the legislature was in direct violation of art. 12, sec. 19, of the constitution. This section reads: “ Taxation shall be equal and uniform throughout the state. All property in the state shall be taxed according to its value, to be ascertained as directed by law, except such property as two-thirds of both houses of the legislature may think proper to exempt from taxation.” *Held*that, under the latter clause of this provision, the legislature could pass the act in question by a concurrent vote of two-thirds of the members of both houses, and that in the absence of any attempt to prove otherwise, it would be presumed that the act was passed in conformity with this provision of the constitution.

§ 325. *Constitutional laws.*It is but a decent respect due to the wisdom, the integrity and the patriotism of the legislative body by which any law is passed, to presume in favor of its validity, until its violation of the *140constitution is proved beyond all reasonable doubt. [Ogden v. Saunders, 12 Wheat. 270.]

May 24, 1877.

§ 326. *Constitutionality of a law.*The constitutionality of a law is to be presumed because the legislature which was first required to pass upon the question, acting, as they must be deemed to have acted, with integrity and with a just desire to keep within the restrictions laid by the constitution upon their action, base adjudged that it is so. They are a co-ordinate department of the government with the judiciary, invested with very high and responsible duties, as to some of which their acts are not subject to judicial scrutiny, and they legislate under the solemnity of an official oath which it is not to be supposed they will disregard. It must therefore be presumed that their own doubts of the constitutionality of their action have been deliberately solved in its favor, so that courts may with some confidence repose upon their conclusion as one based upon their best judgment. [Cooley’s Const. Lim. side p. 183.]

Ee versed and remanded.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Kopin Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 26, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John C.C. Fan, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



Date:

August 3, 2010By:

/S/    JOHN C.C.
FANJohn C.C. FanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
| (1)  | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      April 9, 2009 | By:                                                                                   | /s/ Jonathan      Leinwand |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                     | Jonathan      Leinwand                                                                          |
|                     | Chief      Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer and Principal Financial  Officer) |

----