alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
583 A.2d 349

#### IN THE MATTER OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1988 AND SEPTEMBER 21, 1988 EMERGENCY REDIRECTION OF SOLID WASTE FLOW. BERGEN COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES, ET AL. v. SAL-CAR TRANSFER SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. v. BERGEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, ET AL.

March 30, 1990.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Department of the Air Force senior leaders share Independence Day message

              - Published  July 1, 2021
              -                             By Acting Secretary of the Air Force John P. Roth                                                    

Airmen & Guardians,Independence Day is a time of celebration and a chance to reflect on the founding ideals that make America great – life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. As members of our Nation’s military, we are dedicated to protecting these principles and furthering the fundamental premise of the Declaration of Independence – that all are created equal.This weekend is also an opportunity to reaffirm our commitment to the Constitution. With this landmark document, the Founders created “a more perfect Union.” They understood that America is as much a concept as a physical nation, and that freedom and democracy would expand over time. We are proud that the Air Force and Space Force have protected the American way of life and helped broaden our freedoms.As we observe our Nation’s 245th birthday, thank you for defending our values at home and around the globe. The sacrifices that you and your families make every day ensure the freedom of millions and serve as a guiding light to the world.Holidays are for celebration too! Whether serving at home or overseas, take time to enjoy the fireworks, barbecues, or spending time with friends and family – you have earned it.John P. RothActing Secretary of the Air Force

----

View the full document** here.**

 

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceIndependence DayActing SecAFJohn P. Rothmessageholiday messageCelebrationreflectionOne Air Force
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Soil Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the transitional nine month period ended September
30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Carl P. Ranno, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Carl P. Ranno
-------------------------------
Carl P. Ranno
Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Financial Officer
February 13, 2008
#### THE STATE v. SIDENBENDER, Plaintiff in Error.

Division Two,

December 13, 1904.

Error to Buchanan Criminal Court. — Row. *B. J. Casteel,*Judge.

Affirmed.

*C. C. Crow*for plaintiff in error.

. *Edward C. Crow,*Attorney-General, for the State..

GANTT, P. J.

This cause is before us ,on writ of error to the criminal court of Buchanan county.

For the reasons assigned in State v. Lee Rosenblatt,, page 114, this volume, the indictment is held sufficient, and the writ of error is therefore ordered quashed.

All concur, except *Burgess, J.,*absent.
#### Miller & English v. Sims Bros.

(No. 2094.)

Appeal from Navarro County.

Frost, Barry & Lee, counsel for appellants.

Read, Greer & Greer, counsel for appellees.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 6 5. *Trespass; a levy upon land is not such a tort as will entitle the owner to damages; case stated.*Miller & English sued out an attachment against the property of Hollinger & Sims, and caused the same to be levied by one Cubley, a deputy sheriff, upon certain land belonging to Sims Bros., upon which land they had a mill and gin in operation. In making the levy the officer did not go upon the land, but he forbid Sims Bros, from operating said mill and gin. Sims- Bros., on several occasions, applied to said officer for permission to operate said mill and gin, which permission he refused. They brought this suit against Miller & English and said officer, Cubley, to recover damages by reason of said levy, etc., and recovered judgment for $378.75 for loss of profits and injury to machinery while the mill and gin were idle. Said property was not sold under said attachment. *Held,*under our statute to make a levy on real estate, it is not necessary for the officer to enter upon and take possession of the property. All that is requisite to constitute a valid levy is for the officer to indorse the same on the writ. [R. S. art. 2291; Hancock v. Bridges, 6 Tex. 479.] A trespass upon real property is “ any unauthorized *entry*upon the realty of another to the damage thereof, or resulting in damage to the owner or to his business. There *90must'be an entry upon the.‘land to constitute a trespass upon real property. In this case the officer clid not enter upon the premises, nor were Sims Bros, ousted or dis; possessed of the premises by the officer. The officer merely indorsed the levy upon the writ, leaving them in possession of the property, with full power and right to operate the mill and gin. They needed no permission from the officer to entitle them to operate their mill and gin, and he had no authority whatever to deny them the right to do so. They must be presumed to know their legal rights, and they should not have regarded the injunction of the officer to not operate the mill arid gin. Even if said officer had threatened to arrest and imprison them in case they should operate said mill and gin, still there would have been no such trespass as would entitle them to damages. [Cooley on Torts, 29.] As the case is presented here, appellees have shown1 no cause of action for the damages awarded them.

December 16, 1885.

Reversed and remanded.
762 A.2d 1082

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Respondent, v. Christopher HORN, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Nov. 1, 2000.

*516
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 1st day of November 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED and the order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed. *Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation v. McCafferty,*563 Pa. 146, 758 A.2d 1155 (2000).
579 A.2d 814

#### IN THE MATTER OF STEPHEN P. KERNAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 26, 1990.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is granted; and it is further

*242ORDERED that the petition for reinstatement of STEPHEN P. KERNAN of BRIDGETON as an attorney at law is granted, effective immediately.
Certificate of Trust of HECO Capital Trust III.



 Exhibit 4(a) 
  
 CERTIFICATE OF TRUST 
 OF 
 HECO CAPITAL TRUST III 
  
 THIS Certificate of Trust of HECO Capital Trust III (the “Trust”), dated as of November 20, 2003, is being duly executed and filed on behalf of the Trust
by the undersigned, as trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. § 3801 et seq.) (the “Act”). 
  
 1.    Name.    The name of the statutory trust formed by this Certificate of Trust is
HECO Capital Trust III. 
  
 2.    Delaware
Trustee.    The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware are The Bank of New York (Delaware), White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711. 
  
 3.    Effective Date.    This
Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust, have duly executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act as of the date first-above written. 
  
 THE BANK OF NEW YORK, not in its 
 individual capacity but solely as trustee of 
 the Trust 
  

	 By: /s/ Stacey B. Poindexter

 Name: Stacey B. Poindexter
 Title: Assistant Treasurer
  
 THE BANK OF NEW YORK
 (DELAWARE), not in its individual
 capacity but solely as trustee of the Trust
  
 By: /s/ James Longshaw

 Name: James Longshaw
 Title: Senior Vice President
	 	 /s/ T. Michael May

 T. MICHAEL MAY, not in his individual
 capacity, but solely as trustee of the Trust
  
 /s/ Richard A. von Gnechten

 RICHARD A.
VON GNECHTEN, not in his
 individual capacity, but solely as trustee of
 the Trust
  
 /s/ Lorie Ann Nagata

 LORIE ANN NAGATA, not in her
 individual capacity, but solely as trustee of
 the Trust
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





--------------------------------------------------------------------








In
      connection with the Annual Report of IBSG International, Inc; (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Rivers,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001,
      that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







IBSG
                International, IncMarch
                    29, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Michael
                RiversMichael
              RiversChief
                Executive Officer
News United States Air Force
 Colorado stands in for Afghanistan during pilot trainingPublished Aug. 31, 2016
                        
                        By Dave Smith
                        
                        
                        21st Space Wing Public Affairs
                **PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Colo. (AFNS)  --**
                The beautiful vistas and rugged mountainscapes of Colorado and Afghanistan are so similar that training for warfighting in one is done in the other.The 81st Fighter Squadron from Moody Air Force Base, Georgia, spent two weeks at Peterson AFB training six Afghan Air Force pilots to fly A-29 Super Tucano. The pilots are participating in a program that began in 2015 and will ultimately train 30 pilots and 90 maintainers through 2018. Most training takes place at Moody AFB, but the area’s geography doesn’t replicate Afghanistan.Colorado Springs is a good fit in simulating conditions the pilots will face back home in Afghanistan, said Lt. Col. Ryan Cleveland, the director of operations for the 81st FS. The mean elevation for Afghanistan is 6,181 feet and 6,800 feet for Colorado, making Peterson AFB a match for high-density altitude training.The half-dozen Afghanistan Air Force pilots currently in training represent roughly the halfway point in the program. Experienced Afghan pilots who want to fly the A-29 are selected for the program and after completing language school they enter the training phase for 12-14 months. At the end of training they return home and fly the exact aircraft they trained with, Cleveland said.The A-29 is a turboprop aircraft designed for light attack, counter insurgency, close air support, and aerial reconnaissance missions. Twenty of the aircraft will be delivered to the Afghan Air Force by 2018. The first close air support missions carried out by U.S. trained Afghan A-29 pilots took place in April 2016.Practice and training sessions are carried out in southern Colorado utilizing the Airburst Military Operations Area and the Two Buttes MOA.“We want to say thank you to Peterson for the hospitality,” Cleveland said. “It’s great that they gave us space to work in and (they are) sharing their air space.”The recent training visit in Colorado Springs is the third time the 81st FS used the base to meet the specific needs required to successfully train pilots from Afghanistan.Colorado 



Afghanistan 



pilots 



A-29 



Peterson AFB 



ACC 



Moody AFB 



AFSPC 



training
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 109 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 109

   To amend the Small Business Act to make service-disabled veterans 
         eligible under the 8(a) business development program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Small Business Act to make service-disabled veterans 
         eligible under the 8(a) business development program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disabled Veteran Small Business 
Eligibility Expansion Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF SERVICE-DISABLED VETERANS UNDER 8(A) PROGRAM.

    Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(C) by inserting after ``small business 
        concern owned and controlled by socially and economically 
        disadvantaged individuals'' the following: ``, or a small 
        business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled 
        veterans,''; and
            (2) in paragraph (4)--
                    (A) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as 
                subparagraph (D); and
                    (B) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the 
                following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) For purposes of this section--
                            ``(i) the term `socially and economically 
                        disadvantaged small business concern' includes 
                        a small business concern owned and controlled 
                        by service-disabled veterans; and
                            ``(ii) the term `disadvantaged owner' 
                        includes an owner who is a service-disabled 
                        veteran, in the case of a small business 
                        concern owned and controlled by service-
                        disabled veterans.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### B.C., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D09-2902.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 20, 2011.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Michael T. Davis, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SHEPHERD and LAGOA, JJ„ and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

The adjudication below for possession of marijuana'is affirmed. We conclude that the disputed search of B.C.’s person which revealed the contraband was properly conducted incident to arrest based upon probable cause that, as a passenger in a vehicle which was the site of a drug transaction observed by a fellow officer, B.C. had committed a felony offense. See *Maryland v. Pringle,*540 U.S. 366, 124 S.Ct. 795, 157 L.Ed.2d 769 (2003); see also *Arizona v. Johnson,*555 U.S. 323, 129 S.Ct. 781, 172 L.Ed.2d 694 (2009); see also *State v. Bagley,*844 So.2d 688, 690 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (“The fellow officer rule allows an arresting officer to assume probable cause to arrest a suspect from information supplied *322by other officers.” (quoting *Voorhees v. State,*699 So.2d 602, 609 (Fla.1997))).

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6073

RAYMOND RONALD JENNINGS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. L. Patrick Auld, Magistrate Judge. (1:23-cv-00016-CCE-LPA)

Submitted: September 26, 2023 Decided: October 3, 2023

Before THACKER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Ronald Jennings, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6073 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/03/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Ronald Jennings seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order and 

recommendation that the district court dismiss Jennings’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition without 

prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, 

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); 

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The magistrate 

judge’s order and recommendation is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory 

or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6073 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/03/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1956

JOHN D. MCCOY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District

Judge. (CA-96-125-B)

Submitted: April 7, 1998 Decided: June 18, 1998

Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vernon M. Williams, WOLFE & FARMER, Norton, Virginia, for Appellant. James A. Winn, Chief Counsel, Region III, Patricia M. Smith,

Deputy Chief Counsel, Rafael Melendez, Assistant Regional Counsel,

Office of General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; Robert

P. Crouch, Jr., United States Attorney, John F. Cochran, Assistant

United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant John D. McCoy appeals from district court orders

that adopted the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge,

affirmed an ALJ’s decision denying him disability benefits, and

denied reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible

error. See Hays v. Sullivan, 907 F.2d 1453, 1456 (4th Cir. 1990).

Accordingly, we affirm the orders based upon the reasoning of the

district court. McCoy v. Apfel, No. CA-96-125-B (W.D. Va. May 13 &

29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5741]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from California [Mr. Riggs] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. RIGGS addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32.1



                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the Annual Report of Dstage.com  Inc, a Delaware  corporation
(the  "Company"),  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert P. Atwell,
Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ John E. Hartman
----------------------------------------
John E. Hartman
Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2004
News United States Air Force
 Live stream: Academy Concert Band performs at Mount Rushmore July 3Published July 2, 2015
                        
                        
                        Air Force News Service
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                The U.S. Air Force Academy Concert Band will perform at the Mount Rushmore National Memorial, South Dakota, at 7:30 p.m. MDT on July 3, as part of an Independence Day-themed event. The performance will be broadcast live **here**.Mount Rushmore 



band 



Academy 



U.S. Air Force Academy Concert Band
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Trans  Energy,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, William F. Woodburn , Principal  Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to Sec.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/   William F. Woodburn
----------------------------------
William F. Woodburn
Principal Accounting Officer
November 25, 2005

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.