alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Bridget Hill v. J. A. Newlee.

(No. 2242.)

Appeal from Uvalde County.

*(Transferred from Austin,J*

Baker, Aroher & Clark, counsel for appellant.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 218. *Pleading; facts more fully within knowledge of the adverse party; less particularity required in alleging them; case stated.*Appellee sued appellant upon a pa,rol contract for services rendered by him in conducting a livery business for her. Among other defenses appellant pleaded that appellee had not fully accounted to her in said business; that he had received all the profits of said business; had kept and still had possession of the books of account of said business, and refused to exhibit the same to her, or furnish her with any account of said business, and, therefore, she could not state specifically what amounts of money he had failed to account to .her for, but that he had failed to account for and pay over the sum of $800 of the profits of said business. Appellee excepted generally to this plea, which exception was sustained. *Held*error. The plea was as full and specific as could reasonably be required under the circumstances therein alleged. It averred that the *data*of full and specific information as to the state of accounts between herself and appellee were in his possession, and that she had no access thereto, etc. Where particular facts lie more in the knowledge of the adverse party'than of the party pleading them, less particularity is required in alleging them. [W. & W. Con. Rep. § 431.]

§ 219. *Account stated; requisites of a plea of.*In a supplemental petition appellee alleged an *account stated*against appellant. This pleading was a mere general averment of an account stated, without showing the matters *266adjusted. It was excepted to specially by appellant because it failed to show what particular matters were settled. The exception was overruled. *Held*error. When a party declares upon a parol statement of accounts, he must set forth the accounts settled, by exhibits or otherwise, with such circumstantiality as to apprise the adverse party of the particular matters adjusted. [Neyland v. Neyland, 19 Tex. 423.]

December 11, 1886.

Eeversed and remanded.
583 A.2d 317

#### IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE KIFFERLY, ET AL., FIRE CAPTAIN (LIEUTENANT), PROMOTIONAL EXAMINATION FOR THE TWELVE CONSENT DECREE CITIES.

February 6, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Microbics, Inc., (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert C.
Brehm, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                              /s/ Robert C. Brehm
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Robert C. Brehm
                                              Chief Executive Officer

                                              March 23, 2005



                                       20
#### J. F. & E. A. Leidecker *v.*T. Ratto & Co.

(No. 1452, Op. Book No. 2, p. 697.)

Error from Galveston. County.

February 7, 1883.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 824. *Writ of error; citation must be served on each defendant in error.*The statute expressly provides that if there be more than one defendant in error a true copy of the citation in error shall be delivered to each of the defendants in person. [R. S. 1395.] That the defendants are partners does not affect the rule, or change or modify it. In Clark v. Thompson, 42 Tex. 128, it was held that service of citation upon one of several partners plaintiffs, against whom a writ of error had been taken, was insufficient. All the defendants in error must be served. And in Thompson v. Pine, 55 Tex. 427, it was held that *“a*writ of error will be dismissed, unless it apr pears that all the defendants in error have been cited. The question of error will not be considered unless all the parties'defendant are thus brought before the court.” [See, also, Crunk v. Crunk, 23 Tex. 604; Summerlin v. Reeves, 29 Tex. 85.] Citation in error not having been served upon all the defendants in error, upon motion of defendants in error the writ of error was

Dismissed.
News United States Air Force
 Climate survey is opportunity to share opinions with AF leadersPublished March 30, 2015
                        
                        By Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Total Force Climate Survey, available from March 13 to April 27, offers active-duty, Air National Guard, Air Force Reserve and civilian Airmen a chance to express their opinions, perceptions and suggestions to help leaders improve their units.
The Air Force Survey Office (AFSO) here began emailing participation invitations to all Airmen, and will continue to send invitations through the end of March.
"This is a great opportunity for Airmen across the Air Force to provide feedback to their leaders," said Brenda Gainey, the acting chief of the AFSO. "By completing this survey, you can help your leaders target trouble areas within your organization. You are the best source of information about what is working and what needs improvement."
The survey is designed to assess Airmen's opinions and perceptions on a wide range of topics including resources, recognition, job satisfaction and unit performance. The survey also includes major command-specific questions, and a chance for Airmen to make improvement recommendations through written comments.
"The survey will only take about 20 minutes to complete - a small amount of time compared to the valuable feedback you can provide to your unit leaders," Gainey said. "They want to hear from you."
Once the data is gathered, results will be briefed to the secretary of the Air Force and chief of staff of the Air Force, and will be released to unit leaders this summer.
Unit reports will only contain demographic information regarding service component and officer, enlisted or civilian. If fewer than seven members from a component or officer, enlisted or civilian status respond, the results will not be reported in the breakout at the unit level. All responses will roll up to the next unit level. No other demographic information is provided in unit reports. This protects the confidentiality of respondents.
"The Total Force Climate Survey gives us all a chance to highlight concerns that directly affect us and our unit mission,” Gainey said. “This is critical feedback that leaders at every level need to improve their organizations and the Air Force. Look for your personal invitation to the survey and take advantage of your chance to speak today to shape tomorrow."
For more information about the survey and to view the results of the previous survey, go to the Air Force Portal, enter "Air Force Survey Office" in the search window, select the survey office link and click on the "Total Force Climate Survey" link in the left hand column.
For more information about other personnel subjects go to myPers. Individuals who don't have a myPers account can find instructions on how to create an account by clicking here.Air Force Survey Office 



survey 



morale 



Total Force Climate Survey
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Franklin Street Properties
Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, George J. Carter, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.


Date:  March 10, 2005                     /s/ George J. Carter
                                          -----------------------------
                                          George J. Carter
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
News United States Air Force
 Carter opens 2015 Warrior GamesPublished June 19, 2015
                        
                        By Karen Parrish
                        
                        
                        DoD News, Defense Media Activity
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The 2015 Department of Defense Warrior Games opened June 19, with about 250 athletes from the U.S. and U.K. gathering at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia, to compete for a different victory: celebrating their new lives and their enduring abilities.
Their disabilities are often evident; their warrior spirit is more so.
The Warrior Games were established in 2010 and initially operated by the U.S. Olympic Committee. This year, the lead for the events has transferred to the U.S. military, with the Marine Corps serving as the first sponsor service.**Honoring warrior skills**
Defense Secretary Ash Carter spoke at the opening ceremony.
“The Warrior Games -- you ... the participants in the Warrior Games, you’re the pinnacle of DOD adaptive sports programs -- activities that have helped our men and women heal together ... in mind, in body, and soul,” he said.
Generations of warriors have served their nations when the most desperate call came: “Go to war,” the defense secretary said. The Warrior Games showcase their survival, he added.
Carter noted that over the past year, more than 150,000 U.S. wounded warriors have participated in 28 sports camps and 51 clinics, among other activities.**Gathering of heroes**
After thanking Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Joseph Dunford and the U.S. Marine Corps for hosting the games at Quantico, the defense secretary offered a special welcome to the British competitors and defense and legislative representatives present.
“I want to extend a warm, warm welcome to our British friends and allies -- to the 40 competitors and their guests and to Maj. Gen. (Richard) Cripwell. It’s our privilege to welcome you and our other distinguished guests,” he said.
“We’re all here because of these incredible competitors -- the warrior-athletes competing from our total force: active, Guard and Reserve alike -- the Army, the Navy ... the Marine Corps ... the Coast Guard, the Air Force, the U.S. Special Operations Command and the British Armed Forces,” Carter continued.**Athletes inspiring others**
The secretary said he knew the athletes spent long hours in training for the competition.
“And after inspiring us with your service on duty, you continue to do so this week ... on the court, around the track and in the pool,” the secretary said.
Carter also said he wanted to publicly acknowledge and thank “the family members, the caregivers, the medical professionals, the coaches, friends (and) countless others who’ve supported our warrior-athletes on their journeys to these games.”
Scheduled events through June 28 include wheelchair basketball, sitting volleyball, cycling, archery, field events, shooting, swimming and a wheelchair rugby exhibition.wounded warrior 



opening ceremony 



Ash Carter 



SecDEF 



Warrior Games
News United States Air Force
 Uniform shortage to affect BMT graduatesPublished Dec. 21, 2021
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Due to a shortage of fabric used to manufacture service dress uniforms, Airmen and Guardians graduating from **basic military training** will temporarily be issued fewer uniform items.
This proactive measure will allow Airmen and Guardians to have, at minimum, one full set of service dress while **Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support** works with the manufacturer to restore full production.
This fabric shortage will also affect the supply of service dress items across the Department of the Air Force, however BMT recruits have priority.
Men and women are normally issued two short sleeve blue shirts and two long sleeve blue shirts at BMT. Additionally, men are normally issued three pairs of trousers and women two pairs of slacks. Starting in November, some service members will only be issued one each of those items.
To make sure service members eventually receive their full uniform complement, the DAF will provide the affected active duty BMT graduates a cash allowance in their pay check to buy the missing uniform items as available from the Army and Air Force Exchange Service when they arrive at their next duty station or school. Air Reserve Component graduates will be issued missing items after arrival at their home unit, upon availability.
Burlington Industries is the sole U.S. supplier of approved worsted and poly-wool dress fabric used in all military services’ dress uniforms. The continued shortage in the fabric supply as a result of labor challenges and increased material cost is anticipated to have a greater impact on the production and availability of dress uniforms starting in the third quarter of fiscal year 2022.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



uniform 



shortage 



BMT 



graduates 



basic military training 



service dress 



manufacturing
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-18-00015-CV

_________________

IN RE C.B.

________________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

418th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 17-10-11902-CV

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this mandamus proceeding, Relator, C.B., seeks to compel the trial court to

vacate a temporary order that appoints the Texas Department of Family and 

Protective Services as the temporary sole managing conservator of Relator’s child 

and order the return of the child to Relator. In a mandamus petition supported by 

reporter’s records of the adversary hearing, Relator argues the Department produced

no evidence from which the trial court could find that a person of ordinary prudence 

and caution could be satisfied: (1) that there is a continuing danger to the physical 

health or safety of the child caused by an act or failure to act of the person entitled 
2

to possession of the child and continuation of the child in the home would be contrary 

to the child’s welfare; and (2) that reasonable efforts, consistent with the 

circumstances and providing for the safety of the child, were made to prevent or 

eliminate the need for the removal of the child. See generally Tex. Fam. Code Ann. 

§ 262.201(j) (West Supp. 2017). Based on the record before us, we conclude that 

Relator has not shown that she is entitled to the relief requested. See Walker v. 

Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, the 

petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PETITION DENIED. 

PER CURIAM

Submitted on January 10, 2018

Opinion Delivered January 11, 2018

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1000
       
<S>                                         <C>               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JAN-30-1999       JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             MAY-02-1998       AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                           677               774
<SECURITIES>                                       0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,466             3,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0                 0
<INVENTORY>                                   46,954            46,488
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              59,876            60,101
<PP&E>                                        47,674            49,356
<DEPRECIATION>                                24,917            25,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                85,303            86,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         29,279            27,121
<BONDS>                                            0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0                 0
<PREFERRED>                                        0                 0
<COMMON>                                          70                70
<OTHER-SE>                                    37,122            37,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  85,303            86,102
<SALES>                                       43,383            41,947
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              43,383            41,947
<CGS>                                         22,151            21,757
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 19,438            18,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               437               437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,357               978
<INCOME-TAX>                                     529               381
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              828               597
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (51)                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0                 0
<CHANGES>                                          0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     777               597
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.11              0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.11              0.09
        



</TABLE>
583 A.2d 340

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN D’AMICO.

March 12, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit
33.2



MANAGEMENT’S
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SEC

REGULATION
AB SERVICING CRITERIA



Union
Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) provides this assessment of
compliance with the following applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities
and Exchange Commission. Management has determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform
for the period as follows:



Platform:
The retail installment contracts for HondaAuto Receivables 2011-3 Owner Trust(the “Platform”).



Applicable
Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required in the related transaction agreements
or required by the Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Bank, except for the following
criteria: 1122(d) 1(i), 1(ii), 1(iii), 1(iv), 2(i), 2(iii), 2(iv), 2(v), 2(vi),2(vii), 3(i), 4(i), 4(ii), 4(iii), 4(iv), 4(v), 4(vi), 4(vii), 4(viii), 4(ix), 4(x), 4(xi), 4(xii), 4(xiii), 4(xiv) and 4(xv),
which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Bank performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable
Servicing Criteria”).



Period: As of and for the year ended
March 31, 2013 (the “Period”).



With respect to the Platform and the Period,
the Bank provides the following assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:



| | 1. | The Bank is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The Bank has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria, as described above as of and for the Period. In performing
this assessment, management has used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item
1122 of Regulation AB.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | The Bank was in compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period in all material respects.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Deloitte and Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting
firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to the Bank’s foregoing assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.



|UNION BANK, N.A.          
|--------------------------
|                          
|By:                       
|David Ursa                
|Senior Vice President     
|                          
|By:                       
|Valerie Crain             
|Vice President and Manager



May 24, 2013