alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                     MICRION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES             Exhibit 11
            Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings (Loss)






<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    (UNAUDITED)                (UNAUDITED)
                                                                For the three months       For the nine months
                                                                    ended March 31,           ended March 31,
                                                                  1998         1999         1998         1999
                                                                 -------      -------      -------     -------
                                                                      (in thousands except per share data)

<S>                                                              <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>     
      Net (loss) income ....................................     $(1,255)     $(  954)     $    19     $(2,493)

      (a) Computation of Basic Earnings (Loss)
           per Share:

      Weighted average common shares outstanding:
        Common stock .......................................       4,061        4,088        4,055       4,079
                                                                 -------      -------      -------     -------


       Basic Earnings (Loss) per Share .....................     $( 0.31)     $( 0.23)     $  0.00     $( 0.61)
                                                                 =======      =======      =======     =======


      (b) Computation of Diluted
           Earnings (Loss) per Share:

      Weighted average common equivalent shares outstanding:
        Common stock .......................................       4,061        4,088        4,055       4,079
        Common stock equivalents:
          Warrants(1) ......................................          --           --           62          --
          Options (2) ......................................          --           --          201          --
                                                                 -------      -------      -------     -------
                                                                                                     
      Weighted average common and
      common equivalent shares
      outstanding ..........................................       4,061        4,088        4,318       4,079
                                                                 =======      =======      =======     =======


       Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Share ...................     $( 0.31)     $( 0.23)     $  0.00     $( 0.61)
                                                                 =======      =======      =======     =======
</TABLE>


(1)   Warrants issued 5/94 for 100,000 shares, less shares reacquired under the
      treasury stock method.


(2)   Options granted 11/94 through 3/98, less shares reacquired under the
      treasury stock method.












                                       16
News United States Air Force
 IRS Form 1095 available on myPayPublished Jan. 11, 2016
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs Command Information
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                All active-duty, Guard, Reserve, retiree and civilian Airmen will need proof of health care coverage when filing their federal tax returns for 2015.
“This is the first year that Affordable Care Act requires health care validation for filing their taxes and Airmen need this information,” said Robert W. Burke, the Air Force Accounting and Finance Office director, finance division.
Under the ACA, U.S. citizens and legal residents are required to obtain and maintain a minimum standard of health care insurance, called minimum essential coverage. The proof of minimum essential coverage will be provided by the Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service Form 1095. TRICARE is one of many health providers qualifying for this coverage.
In January 2016, Defense Finance and Accounting Service is required to provide each employee with the IRS Form 1095 for employment during 2015. A hard copy form is scheduled to be mailed to each employee and the form will also be available electronically through myPay under the taxes section.
“The Air Force would like to stress the importance for Airmen to elect to receive the form electronic only,” Burke continued. “This action will save the Air Force $200,000 and cause no environmental impact.”
Additional information about the impact of the ACA can be found here.Affordable Care Act 



ACA 



health care 



taxes 



DFAS 



myPary 



Form 1095
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12327 and #12328]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Wisconsin (FEMA-1933-DR), dated 09/18/2010. *Incident:*
                         Severe storms, tornadoes, and flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         07/20/2010 through 07/24/2010. *Effective Date:*
                         09/18/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/17/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/20/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/18/2010, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):* Grant, Milwaukee. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* Wisconsin: Crawford, Iowa, Lafayette, Ozaukee, Racine, Richland, Washington, Waukesha. Iowa: Clayton, Dubuque. Illinois: Jo Daviess. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.000Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12327B and for economic injury is 123280. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2010-23998 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 19

- 00241

- CR

JUAN DOMINGO RAMIREZ, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court Hopkins County, Texas Trial Court No. 1927238

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 O R D E R Appellant Juan Domingo Ramirez was convicted of continuous sexual abuse of a young child and sentenced to life imprisonment. Ramirez has appealed from that conviction and the resulting sentence. On March 11, 2020, Ramirez’s court

- appointed appellate coun sel, Frank R. Hughes, III, filed an Anders 1 brief, and on March 27, 2020, Ramirez filed a pro se motion for access to the appellate record for purposes of preparing a response to his counsel’s Anders brief. Ramirez’s motion for access to the appellate re cord is granted. Under Kelly v. State , 2 we are required to enter an order specifying the procedure to be followed to ensure Ramirez’s access to

the record. On March 31, 2020, Hughes advised this Court that he would mail a complete paper copy of the appel late record to Ramirez. Allowing fifteen days from the date of this order for the record to be delivered to Ramirez and giving him thirty days to prepare his pro se response, we hereby set May 18, 2020, as the deadline for Ramirez to file his pro se respo nse to his counsel’s Anders

brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

DATE: April 1, 2020

1 See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 73 8 (1967).

2 Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 321

– 22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
#### The People *versus*Oliver M. Lownds, Sheriff of the City and County of New-York.

Oct. Term, 1828.

On an attachment against the Sheriff for not returning a *fi. fa.*ruled, that the recognizance be in double the amount of the *fi. fa.*and that the sheriff should answer such interrogatories as should' be regularly exhibited.

An attachment had been issued against the sheriff for not returning a *fi. fa.*on which were endorsed directions to levy $331 *Judah*moved, that the sheriff’s recognizance to appear *de die in diem,*(until the court should determine concerning the matters objected against him,) be in double the amount o^ *the fi. fa.*with two sureties, according to the form in the first of *CowerCs Reports,*[580. *n. (a.) See also Herring v. Tylee,*1 Johns. *Cases,*31. *and*1 *Dunlap's Prac.*346.]

The Court

directed the recognizance accordingly, and thatthe sheriff should answer such interrogatories as should be regularly exhibited.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 127 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 127

   To amend the National Housing Act to increase the mortgage amount 
  limits applicable to FHA mortgage insurance for multifamily housing 
                      located in high-cost areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

   Mr. Frank of Massachusetts (for himself and Mr. Gary G. Miller of 
 California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the National Housing Act to increase the mortgage amount 
  limits applicable to FHA mortgage insurance for multifamily housing 
                      located in high-cost areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FHA Multifamily Loan Limit 
Adjustment Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. MULTIFAMILY HOUSING MORTGAGE LIMITS IN HIGH COST AREAS.

    The National Housing Act is amended--
            (1) in sections 207(c)(3), 213(b)(2)(B)(i), 
        221(d)(3)(ii)(II), 221(d)(4)(ii)(II), 231(c)(2)(B), and 
        234(e)(3)(B) (12 U.S.C. 1713(c)(3), 1715e(b)(2)(B)(i), 
        1715l(d)(3)(ii)(II), 1715l(d)(4)(ii)(II), 1715v(c)(2)(B), and 
        1715y(e)(3)(B))--
                    (A) by striking ``140 percent'' each place such 
                term appears and inserting ``170 percent''; and
                    (B) by striking ``170 percent in high cost areas'' 
                each time place such term appears and inserting ``215 
                percent in high cost areas''; and
            (2) in section 220(d)(3)(B)(iii)(III) (12 U.S.C. 
        1715k(d)(3)(B)(iii)(III)) by striking ``206A'' and all that 
        follows through ``project-by-project basis'' and inserting the 
        following: ``206A of this Act) by not to exceed 170 percent in 
        any geographical area where the Secretary finds that cost 
        levels so require and by not to exceed 170 percent, or 215 
        percent in high cost areas, where the Secretary determines it 
        necessary on a project-by-project basis''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 58418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24008]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3315-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]


Massachusetts; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (FEMA-3315-EM), dated September 2, 
2010, and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 4, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective September 4, 2010.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-24008 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
583 A.2d 337

#### DONALD ZIEF v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MONTCLAIR.

March 7, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
583 A.2d 327

#### IN THE MATTER OF TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD v. MICHAEL J. FRIEL, JR., AND JOSEPH MCCARTHY.

February 26, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### S. Jacobs, Bernheim & Co. v. The Augusta Cooperative Association.

(No. 2212.)

Appeal from Houston County.

Nunn & Aldrich, for appellants.

No counsel appeared for appellee.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 231. *Private corporation; may be- created for mercantile business; case slated.*Appellants instituted this suit in the county court against twenty-eight parties as partners engaged in and conducting a mercantile business at the town of Augusta in the county of Houston, under the firm, name and style of “The Augusta Cooperative Association,” the cause of action being an open account for goods, etc., amounting to $224. Appellees answered under oath denying the alleged partnership, and pleaded specially that they were a private corporation duly incorporated under the name of “The Augusta Co-operative Association,” that said corporation had been dissolved, and that they nor either of them were indebted in any sum whatever to said corporation. Trial was had before the court without a jury, and the court sustained appellees’ denial of partnership, and special plea, *281and rendered judgment in favor of appellants against 1 ‘ The Augusta Co-operative Association ” as a private corporation, and refused to render judgment against appellees individually. *Held,*the judgment is correct. It is insisted for appellants that “ The Augusta Co-operative Association ” was created for the purpose of owning and managing a mercantile establishment for the mutual profit and benefit of its members, and that the laws of this state do not provide for a corporation for such purposes.” In the general laws with regard to private corporations and their creation it is provided by article 566, Revised Statutes, “that the purposes for which private corporations may be formed are, ” — • then follows the enumeration of twenty-six specific purposes, after, which in the same article is the general clause declaring that such corporation may be created ‘ ‘ for any other purpose intended for mutual profit or benefit not otherwise especially provided for, and not inconsistent with the constitution and laws of this state.” Referring to this clause, the supreme court, in Navigation Co. v. Galveston County, 45 Tex. 290, say, it “is controlled by the subject to which it relates, and refers to objects of the character of those named in the act.” Applying this construction to this case, we are of the opinion that a co-operative association for the purpose of carrying on a mercantile business is of a character with the other purposes named in the act, and is authorized thereby, and is not inconsistent with the constitution or laws of this state.

February 5, 1887.

Affirmed.
### --/ty-)/—<4>£*^<4^^z^l^^ j±.zy7± >vyy s~/s<A< &£/? * 2\ fl^Z •____ • - 

## IP®*•"•'

7^^.ytiL^l33-3?2/sr <Co^AJ,.r>/-J3~aa9c>3~Cn 'fifi-nJng-;.<r _ZM//> 7" .^S/.-fQ Z^JZL y&i^: /g-y>yg>v^ JZ~" ^yc^y\y ^/J.^^y.<ry^^/7 'JJTCZ- S7-<£iy*£j&d5Lc>siS UA^ZJTl ZZ^\A^l A/pT yWC?/l& /T. '<~a7-lSf./s^ 

### J7Z£^<A/S££/L U.A//7Z ^JUL y\A/y y^J^i, /*s//\L£ s//iiJ yw^y S£/SV'T TJCL-y*?ST. : l__ Lu 3&&s /s y-At^M^v^/ z±jm>Ji£s^y-^^ L _^V\£fcci^Lxd^l_^^VsJZcL/jLt_J</-i. 

### jCl^&^oJZTX-. PPP.^^L'^a S-e-AJi-y /"o-o-^^/ <£^L£i^/Ssy ^\a/^>- 

# -£hj> y^.^yolis
**Exhibit
      (23.1)**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
      on Form S-8 (File No. 333-68302), Form S-3 (File No. 333-125803), Form S-3
      (File No. 333-66371), Form S-3 (File No. 333-54706), form S-3 (File No.
      333-108054), Form S-3 (File No. 333-111183) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-99435)
      of
      Trustreet Properties, Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2006 , relating to
      the
      financial statements , financial statement schedules, management’s assessment of
      the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the
      effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Trustreet
      Properties, Inc., which appear in this Form 10-K/A.









/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP


Orlando,
      Florida


March
      16,
      2006
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-1148 

(Serial No. 07/925,450) 

IN RE JUNG J. LEE 

Clifford D. Hyra, The Law Office of James C. Wray, of McLean, Virginia, argued 

for appellant. With him on the brief was James C. Wray. 

Shannon M. Hansen, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States 

Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United 

States Patent and Trademark Office. With her on the brief was Thomas L. Stoll, 

Associate Solicitor. Of counsel was Sydney O. Johnson, Acting Solicitor. 

Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office 

 Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-1148 

(Serial No. 07/925,450) 

IN RE JUNG J. LEE 

Judgment 

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 

 

In CASE NO(S). 07/925,450. 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam: (MAYER, LOURIE and PROST, Circuit Judges): 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

DATE: August 7, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly, Clerk
News United States Air Force
 Latest issue of Airman magazine now availablePublished July 7, 2015
                        
                        
                        Airman magazine staff
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this issue of Airman magazine, you’ll meet Airmen who are assigned to Creech Air Force Base, Nevada, who have a vastly different deployment experience than most others in the Air Force, where they operate from Creech AFB and come home to their families at the end of their shift. They’re responsible for missions happening across the world in Iraq and Afghanistan. This brings a whole new layer of issues these Airmen must overcome to perform their duties.
You’ll also read about how the Air Force is converting F-4 Phantoms into aerial targets to better train the service’s pilots.
In our final story, we traveled to South Carolina, where members of the Wyoming Air National Guard and other Airmen were taking part in Modular Airborne Fire Fighting System training with their U.S. Forest Service counterparts. This annual training exercise is vital in preparing C-130 Hercules crewmembers for the upcoming wildfire season.
You can download Airman magazine’s July issue for your tablet here:**Apple****Android**
No tablet, no problem. Click **here**to view on your web browser. 
For more stories, visit **Airman Online**, the website for the official magazine of the U.S. Air Force.magazine 



Creech AFB 



ACC 



AFCENT 



F-4 



Wyoming Air National Guard 



ANG 



C-130 Hercules 



Airman
422 A.2d 1167

#### Commonwealth v. Crump, Appellant.

Submitted December 8, 1978.

Roger F. Perry, for appellant; Edward G. Rendell, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before CERCONE, HESTER and HOFFMAN, JJ.

Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Jason Ramjattansingh v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-15-01089-CR

Trial court case number: 2019635

Trial court: County Criminal Court of Law No. 8 of Harris County

Appellant Jason Ramjattansingh was convicted of Class A misdemeanor driving while 

intoxicated. See TEX. PENAL CODE §§ 49.04(a), (b), (d). Ramjattansingh appealed his conviction, 

and on August 10, 2017, we issued an opinion that reversed his Class A misdemeanor conviction, 

rendered a judgment of acquittal on that charge, and remanded for a new trial on the lesser-included 

Class B misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated. Ramjattansingh v. State, 530 S.W.3d 

259, 260 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2017), rev’d, PD-0972-17, 2018 WL 2714677 (Tex. 

Crim. App. June 6, 2018). On June 6, 2018, the Court of Criminal Appeals issued an opinion that 

reversed our judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s 

holding. Ramjattansingh v. State, PD-0972-17, 2018 WL 2714677, at *8 (Tex. Crim. App. June 6, 

2018).

We ORDER that any additional briefing by either party must be filed with this Court 

within 21 days from the date of this order. We further ORDER that any response briefing by either 

party must be filed with this Court within 10 ten days after the initial 21-day deadline. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 26, 2018