alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
E. Mead, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated:  October 17, 2003                                /s/ ROBERT E. MEAD
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                            Robert E. Mead


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Silverleaf Resorts, Inc. and will be retained by Silverleaf
Resorts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0635

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

SAUL JAMES DOOLING,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 19, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 10 2023

04/10/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0635
News United States Air Force
 AF announces 2017 support squadron commander candidatesPublished Oct. 5, 2016
                        
                        By Kat Bailey
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force officials have selected 921 officers from more than 20 career fields as the 2017 support, logistics and materiel leader commander candidates.
“This is a highly competitive selection process,” said Sophia Barnard, of the Air Force Personnel Center special duty assignments branch. “Selected candidates have demonstrated traits essential for leading Airmen toward day-to-day operational success.” 
The development teams reviewed all aspects of the candidates’ records, duty histories, demonstrated leadership abilities, professional development and permanent change of station eligibility to identify the most qualified for command.
Wing hiring officials, major command functional managers and AFPC assignment teams will use the candidate list to fill projected 2017 squadron commander vacancies, with those selection results planned for a December release.
“Not all officers on the candidate lists will get command assignments,” Barnard said. “The development teams typically select more qualified officers than there are projected vacancies to account for any unexpected events during the year.”
Candidates will remain on the list if not selected for command until the list is superseded by the following year’s results, unless they are removed for one of a variety of reasons such as selection for another assignment opportunity.
Candidate lists have posted to myPers. To view the list, select “Active Duty Officer” from the dropdown menu and search “Consolidated Squadron.”
For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to the myPers website. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following the instructions on the Air Force Retirees Services website.MyPers 



commander 



squadron 



FM 



AFPC
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                      PROJECT SOFTWARE & DEVELOPMENT, INC.
<TABLE>

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<CAPTION>

                           Type of Security
                           ----------------
                                                                  Primary          Fully Diluted
                                                                  -------          -------------
<S>                                                             <C>                  <C>      
COMPANY, FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1996:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding . . . . . . . .   9,708,322            9,708,322
     Common stock equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     419,564              455,669
                                                                -----------          -----------
                                                                 10,127,886           10,163,991

Historical net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,528,827          $ 3,528,827
Historical net income per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        0.35                 0.35



COMPANY, FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding  . . . . . . . . .   9,567,757            9,567,757
  Common stock equivalents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     481,144              518,850
                                                                -----------          -----------   
                                                                 10,048,901           10,086,607

Historical net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,127,452          $ 2,127,452
Historical net income per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $      0.21          $      0.21

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1     **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration    Statement on Form S-8 (File    Nos. 333-06850,333-11384,333-12326,333-13494,333-105348,333-108869    and    333-137364)    pertaining to the 1997 Director Share Option Scheme, the 1999    Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1997 Share Option Scheme, as    amended and the 2006 Share Incentive Plan of IONA Technologies    PLC, the 1997 Stock Option Plan of Genesis Development    Corporation and the 1999 Stock Option Plan of Netfish    Technologies, Inc., of our report dated March 14, 2008,    with respect to the Consolidated Financial Statements of IONA    Technologies PLC and the effectiveness of internal control over    financial reporting of IONA Technologies PLC included in the    Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,    2007.     Ernst & Young    Dublin, Ireland     March 14, 2008
#### STATE ex rel. Robert P. BENJAMIN v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2010-KH-1083.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2011.

In re Benjamin, Robert P.; —Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. A, No. 362-445; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-K-0530.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1124]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          TRIBUTE TO JIM HENRY

                                 ______

                          HON. JAMES M. TALENT

                              of missouri

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, May 24, 1995
  Mr. TALENT. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to offer my congratulations to 
Jim Henry, a constituent of mine who was recently awarded the Small 
Business Administration's ``1995 Small Business Person of the Year'' 
award for the State of Missouri.
  Ten years ago Mr. Henry left his job with Emerson Electric and bought 
R.C. Wilson Co., a small collection agency in St. Louis, Missouri. At 
the time Mr. Henry bought R.C. Wilson he had no small business 
experience or background, but he did have a can-do philosophy, which 
has helped him build one of the most successful collection companies in 
out city. Over the past ten years, sales, employment and clientele at 
R.C. Wilson have grown significantly. Sales have increased by 200 
percent, while employment at R.C. Wilson have grown from 25 to 118. At 
the same time, his company's collection success rate is over 30 
percent--higher than the 22 percent average for the industry.
  Mr. Henry explains his success this way: ``The way a business owner 
treats employees makes or breaks a business. The key to long-term 
success is to treat your employees with dignity and always maintain the 
highest level of integrity and honesty in all dealings.'' This attitude 
is reflected in the companies employee benefit policies. R.C. Wilson 
Co. has a generous tuition reimbursement program which enables many 
employees to continue their education through post-graduate levels. The 
company also provides an annual scholarship for Missouri Business Week 
to the child of one employee. The company also shares profits with its 
employees.
  Mr. Speaker, I want to close by again offering Mr. Henry my 
congratulations on being named the 1995 Missouri Small Business Person 
of the Year, and to wish him and the employees of R.C. Wilson Co. 
continued success.

                          ____________________
```
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 127 

To amend the National Housing Act to increase the mortgage amount limits 

applicable to FHA mortgage insurance for multifamily housing located 

in high-cost areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts (for himself and Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the National Housing Act to increase the mortgage amount limits applicable to FHA mortgage insurance for multifamily housing located in high-cost areas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FHA Multifamily Loan 

5 Limit Adjustment Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MULTIFAMILY HOUSING MORTGAGE LIMITS IN 

7 HIGH COST AREAS. 

8 The National Housing Act is amended— 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HR 127 IH

1 (1) in sections 207(c)(3), 213(b)(2)(B)(i), 

2 221(d)(3)(ii)(II), 221(d)(4)(ii)(II), 231(c)(2)(B), 

3 and 234(e)(3)(B) (12 U.S.C. 1713(c)(3), 

4 1715e(b)(2)(B)(i), 1715l(d)(3)(ii)(II), 

5 1715l(d)(4)(ii)(II), 1715v(c)(2)(B), and 

6 1715y(e)(3)(B))— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘140 percent’’ each place 

8 such term appears and inserting ‘‘170 percent’’; 

9 and 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘170 percent in high cost 

11 areas’’ each time place such term appears and 

12 inserting ‘‘215 percent in high cost areas’’; and 

13 (2) in section 220(d)(3)(B)(iii)(III) (12 U.S.C. 

14 1715k(d)(3)(B)(iii)(III)) by striking ‘‘206A’’ and all 

15 that follows through ‘‘project-by-project basis’’ and 

16 inserting the following: ‘‘206A of this Act) by not to 

17 exceed 170 percent in any geographical area where 

18 the Secretary finds that cost levels so require and by 

19 not to exceed 170 percent, or 215 percent in high 

20 cost areas, where the Secretary determines it nec21 essary on a project-by-project basis’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Eyck WIMBY.

No. 2011-KK-2833.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 2012.

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. G, No. 504-914; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2011-K-1441.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002

         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Trans  Energy,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, James
K. Abcouwer,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,
                  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and result
                  of operations of the Company.

/S/  JAMES K. ABCOUWER
---------------------------
James K. Abcouwer
Chief Executive Officer
August 16, 2007

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.  The foregoing  certifications are accompanying the Company's Form
10-QSB  solely  pursuant  to  section  906 of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code)  and is not  being  filed  as part of the  Form  10-QSB  or as a  separate
disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                         1,000
       
<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                     14,347
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              18,545
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           43,639
<PP&E>                                                  1,061,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                             86,737
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          1,144,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      27,293
<BONDS>                                                   458,529
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                      332
<OTHER-SE>                                                563,291
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            1,144,007
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          123,762
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              72,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            4,231
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         20,739
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            26,376
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        26,376
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            (3,309)
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                               23,067
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0.86
        



</TABLE>
No. 87-1216.

#### Arthur Young & Co. *v.*Burull et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Didsbury, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A of DARA BioSciences, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of DARA BioSciences, Inc.



By:

/s/ John DidsburyName:

John DidsburyTitle:

President and Chief Operating OfficerDate:

August 18, 2008


I, John C. Thomas, Jr., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A of DARA BioSciences, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of DARA BioSciences, Inc.



By:

/s/ John C. Thomas, Jr.Name:

John C. Thomas, Jr.Title:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

August 18, 2008
#### G. C. & S. *F.*R’y Co. v. W. H. Ford et al.

(No. 1878.)

Appeal from Burleson County.

Sam. G-. Ragsdale and Ballinger, Mott & Terry, counsel for appellant.

W. K. Homan, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 147. *Parties; in suit by tenant, landlord is a necessary, when; intervention; party cannot intervene on appeal from justice's to county court; case stated.*Ford brought this suit against appellant in justice’s court to recover damages for injury done to his crop because of the destruction by fire of the fence which inclosed it, alleging that such injury was caused by the negligence of appellant. He recovered judgment in said court, and appellant appealed to the county court. In the latter court, Laura Steele, by leave of the court, intervened and was made a party to the suit, alleging that Ford was her *188tenant, and that she owned an undivided interest of one-third in the crop alleged to have been injured. Appellant moved to strike out Steele’s plea of intervention, which motion was overruled, and judgment was rendered for Ford and said intervenor jointly against appellant for the damages claimed, etc. *Held:*1. Laura Steele, being jointly interested with Ford in the damages sued for, was a necessary party to this suit. 2. She should have joined with Ford as a co-plaintiff in justice’s court, but after appeal to the county court, she could not thus become a party to the suit. The *case*tried by the justice must be the case tried *de novo*by the county court, and hence a new party in the case cannot be made in the county court. The court erred in not striking out the plea of intervention.

March 23, 1886.

Reversed and remanded.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, PETER J. RICE, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MRO Software, Inc., a
Massachusetts Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 9, 2005

By: /s/ Peter J. Rice
---------------------------------
Peter J. Rice
Executive Vice President, Finance & Administration
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Page 30