alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Cronos Group (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, Dennis J.
Tietz, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Peter J. Younger, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, based on their knowledge, that:

      (i)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.

      August 13, 2004

      /s/ DENNIS J. TIETZ
      Dennis J. Tietz, Chief Executive Officer

      /s/ PETER J. YOUNGER
      Peter J. Younger, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

------------------
* This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
other than as required by Section 906, is not deemed to be "filed" with the
Commission or subject to the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of
Section 18 of said Act.

                                                                             E51
spon-opin


Exhibit 4.1










EMMET, MARVIN & MARTIN, LLP

COUNSELLORS AT LAW




	


WRITER’S DIRECT DIAL

	120 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10271

_____

(212) 238-3000

_____

FAX: (212) 238-3100

http://www.emmetmarvin.com

	177 MADISON AVENUE

MORRISTOWN, NEW JERSEY 07960

(973) 538-5600

FAX: (973) 538-6448




1351 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD

2ND FLOOR




STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT 06902-4543

(203) 425-1400

FAX: (203) 425-1410




December 19, 2003

The Bank of New York

  as Depositary

101 Barclay Street

New York, New York, 10286

	Re:

	American Depositary Receipts for Ordinary Participation Certificates representing Series A-1 Common Shares, without par value, of Carso Global Telecom, S.A. de C.V.




Ladies and Gentlemen:

We refer to the registration statement to be filed on Form F-6 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Registration Statement") by the legal entity created by the agreement (the "Deposit Agreement") for issuance of American Depositary Shares ("ADSs") evidenced by American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") for Ordinary Participation Certificates representing Series A-1 Common Shares, without par value, of Carso Global Telecom, S.A. de C.V. for which you propose to act as Depositary.

We are of the opinion that the ADSs covered by the Registration Statement, when issued in accordance with the terms of the Deposit Agreement, will, when sold, be legally issued and will entitle the holders thereof to the rights specified in the Deposit Agreement and the ADRs.

This opinion may be used by you as an exhibit to the Registration Statement.

Very truly yours,




/s/ EMMET, MARVIN & MARTIN, LLP

EMMET, MARVIN & MARTIN, LLP
583 A.2d 308

#### DONALD CASSOFF v. EILEEN T. QUIGLEY, INC.

January 23, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew F. Puzder, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
August 11, 2003 of CKE Restaurants, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-82538 and 34-47986]

c)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financing reporting.




Date: September 22, 2003




|/s/ Andrew F. Puzder                    
|----------------------------------------
|                                        
|Andrew F. Puzder
Chief Executive Officer
583 A.2d 333

#### FRED KAZAREN AND ETHEL KAZAREN v. STATE FARM INSURANCE AND JOSEPH WANKO.

March 7, 1990.

Petition for certification granted.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5625]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair will recognize 20 Members on each 
side for the purposes of making a 1-minute address to the House.

                          ____________________
```
#### JOHN FOX v. WOODBRIDGE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION.

March 27, 1984.

Petition for certification granted.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Theodore Abajian, Chief Financial Officer of CKE Restaurants, Inc. (the
Company), certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
August 9, 2004, of the Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the

effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls
over financial reporting. Date: December 17, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Theodore AbajianTheodore AbajianChief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.01****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration statements of ourreport dated February 22, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financialstatement schedules of Hartford Life, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s change in its method of accounting andreporting for certain nontraditional long-duration contracts and for separate accounts in 2004)appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life, Inc. for the year ended December 31,2005.   Form S-3 Registration Nos. Form S-8 Registration Nos.333-21865 333-28805333-56283 333-28807333-60944 333-34076DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPHartford, Connecticut
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23645]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, October 1, 2010.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-23645 Filed 9-17-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
#### M. F. Mott, Adm’r, v. Henry Ruenbuhl.

(No. *110, Tex.*L. J., vol. *1,*p. 60.)

Appeal from Galveston County.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 599. *Non-joinder of parties.*The want of proper parties should be taken advantage of by special demurrer. If the demurrer, for want of proper parties, is sustained, the suit will not necessarily be dismissed, but the plaintiff may have leave to amend by bringing in the proper parties. In this case the other necessary parties came in, made themselves parties to the suit, and acknowledged themselves bound by the judgment. We can see no objection to the making of parties, during the progress of a cause, who have been omitted in bringing the suit. [Williams v. Bradbury, 9 Tex. 487; Shelby v. Burtis, 18 Tex. 644; Kegans v. Allcorn, 9 Tex. 34.]

§ 600. *Administrator de bonis non; duties of.*Brown was administrator of the estate of Pfleger, and having been removed, Franklin was appointed administrator *de bonis non.*About the same time Brown filed his final account; in which he acknowledged a balance due the heirs of Pfleger, of whom there were four, amounting to $849.32. Brown died, and administration was granted on his estate. Appellant presented his claim to the administrator of Brown for one-fourth the amount due from Brown to Pfleger’s estate. This claim was rejected, and this suit at once instituted. Held, if the estate of Brown is liable at all for money in the hands of Brown at the time he made his final settlement as administrator, it is first to Franklin, administrator *de bonis non.*It is the duty of an administrator *de bonis non*to collect and receive from his predecessor all the property of every description in his hands at the date of his removal.

§ 601. *Statute of limitations.*It is the opinion of the court that as tó plaintiff’s cause of action the statute of limitations commenced running when Brown filed his *321final report as administrator and was removed, and that it was barred by the four years’ statute when this suit was instituted. At the time indicated, Brown ceased to be a trustee in any legal sense, and it was then the duty of Franklin, his successor, to require him to turn over all the money and effects which he had in his hands as administrator. His successor and the heirs and creditors of the estate were then put upon notice that he was no longer administrator. Appellee does not claim that he was laboring under any personal disability; he alleges no concealment; he does not aver recent discovery; but from his own showing he stands by in silence for over five years from Brown’s renunciation of the trust, and after Brown’s death, without demanding the money or even presenting a claim against his administrator. The plaintiff was not entitled to judgment on the pleadings .and proof.

March 8, 1877.

§ 602. *Judgment against an estate; form of.*It is ■error in rendering judgment against an estate to order issuance of execution. The law provides that the judgment shall “be paid in due course of administration.”

Reversed and remanded.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1087 

To amend the Clean Air Act to require that mercury emissions from electric 

utility steam generating units be subject to the MACT standard for 

hazardous air pollutants, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2007 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act to require that mercury emissions from electric utility steam generating units be subject to the MACT standard for hazardous air pollutants, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mercury Emissions 

5 Reduction Act’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1087 IH

1 SEC. 2. MERCURY FROM ELECTRIC UTILITY STEAM GENER2 ATING UNITS. 

3 Section 112(c)(6) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

4 7412(c)(6)) is amended by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(6)’’, 

5 by striking the last sentence, and by adding the following 

6 new subparagraph at the end thereof: 

7 ‘‘(B) The Administrator shall promulgate 

8 standards under this section for mercury emissions 

9 from electric utility steam generating units to take 

10 effect one year after the enactment of this subpara11 graph.’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Cite as 2017 Ark. 250



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
No. CV

- 17

- 474

DANIELLE BLAIR APPELLANT
V.
RANDALL WILLIS APPELLEE Opinion Delivered: September 14 , 2017
APPEAL FROM THE GARLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [ NO

. 26DR

- 15

- 686 ]
HONORABLE LYNN WILLIAMS , JUDGE
DISSENT ON DENIAL OF PETITION FOR REVIEW

.
JOSEPHINE LINKER HART , Associate Justice
I would grant appellant’s petition asking that this court review the decision of the Arkansas Court of Appeals in Blair v. Willis , 2017 Ark. App. 324, 521 S.W.3d 535. As noted by the court of appeals, t he issues raised by appellant on appeal were (1) whether appellee’s petition for child support should be considered a request for modification of child support, and (2) whether equitable principles barred appellee’s request for child support. Nevertheless, in a paragraph that is dicta and addresses issues not argued on appeal, the court of appeals cites to Fonken v. Fonken , 334 Ark. 637 , 976 S.W.2d 952 ( 1998 ) , and concludes
that the case supports the circuit court’s decision to award retroactive child support from
2002 to 2007 to a parent who no longer has physical custody of the children

. The gist of
Fonken is its interpretation of A rk ansas Code Annotated § 9

- 14

- 105 (c ) (Repl. 2015 ) , which provides that “[a] ny person eighteen (18) years of age or above to whom support was owedCite as 2017 Ark. 250

2 during his or her minority may file a petition for a judgment against the n onsupporting parent or parents.”
Unlike Fonken , there is no child in this case seeking child support. Thus, Fonken has no bearing on the case at bar. Rather, the circuit court is a warding child support to a p arent who does not have physical custody of the children. T his award is plainly contrary to
Ark ansas Code Annotated § 9

- 14

- 105(b) (1) , which provides that the person seeking child support must have “ physical custody of a minor ch ild .” See Hardy v. Wilbourne , 370 Ark. 359, 365, 259 S.W.3d 405 , 410 (2007) (stating that the “ plain language of subsection (b)(1) requires that the parent petitioning for an order of child support hav e physical custody of the child”). Thus, the court of a ppeals has taken money o ut of the household in which two
teenage children physically reside and transferred the funds to a household where the
children do not physically reside. This result is the exact situation that the statute was designed to prevent. Given the court of appeals’ t roubling analysis , I would grant the petition for review

.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10237 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. DAMACIO ANDRADE-CASTANEDA Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-295-1 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case following remands for resentencing, Damacio Andrade-Castaneda raises arguments that are foreclosed by the lawofthe case doctrine. See United Statesv. Matthews, 312 F.3d 652, 657 (5th Cir. 2002) (holding that under the law of the case doctrine, an issue of fact or law decided on appeal may not be reexamined by the appellate court on a United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 5, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-10237

2 subsequent appeal). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review  Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict: Ethical, Legal, and Social Research.                    

*Date:*                         September 27, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Richard A. Currie, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1108, MSC 7890, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1219,                         *currieri@csr.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

                        Dated:                        **                         September 16, 2010.                    

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-23849 Filed 9-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P