alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### JOHNSON *v.*DRAKE.

A cause of action was alleged, and it was error to sustain a general demurrer to the petition.

Receivers, 34 Cyc. p. Ill, n. 41.

No. 6250.

March 15, 1928.

Equitable petition. Before Judge E. D. Thomas. Eulton superior court. August 30, 1927.

*Sims & Berman,*for plaintiff.

*Leo Sudderth*and *Branch & Howard,*for defendant.

Gilbert, J.

Mrs. Lucy Johnson filed a bill for receiver against Mrs. Hattie Drake, alleging that the defendant was the widow of J. E. Drake, who at the time of his death owned a general merchandise store over which petitioner had been manager for the two years next preceding; that petitioner, a widow with two minor children, was the sister of said deceased; that in the presence of witnesses he had given her said stock of merchandise and the good will of said business for the support of herself and children; that the defendant acknowledged the same, and turned the keys of said store over to petitioner, promising she would make a deed *168thereof to petitioner as the sole heir at law of Drake, but later demanded possession of the property as having been set aside to her as a year’s support, to which petitioner acceded under protest: that the court of ordinary was without jurisdiction to set aside said property to the widow of Drake as a year’s support, and petitioner knew nothing of said proceeding; that the value of said merchandise was about $5000, of which it was impossible for petitioner to make an inventory, nor could she sue at law therefor or for the good will of the same; that both Mrs. Drake and petitioner were claiming title to the property, and it would not be just for either to have possession pending the dispute, but a receiver should be appointed who should appraise and sell the property, and dispose of the proceeds according to the order of the court as to equity should appertain; and that petitioner had operated the store believing it to be her own, paying the expenses incident thereto, until the defendant came to her and suddenly demanded possession, stating that the property had been set aside to defendant as a year’s support and she would no’t permit petitioner to have it. A temporary receiver was appointed, with instruction to take possession and make an appraisement. The defendant answered, and demurred generally and specially. The court sustained the general ground of demurrer, dismissing the petition without passing on the special grounds, and discharging the temporary receiver. The plaintiff excepted.

1. The petition set out a cause of action sufficient to withstand a general demurrer.

2. The judgment sustaining the demurrer being erroneous, all other proceedings were nugatory.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices*concur, *except*Beck, *P. J., and Ailcmson, J., who dissent.*
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





--------------------------------------------------------------------








In
      connection with the Annual Report of IBSG
      International, Inc ;
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Michael Rivers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2001, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      April 6, 2006


IBSG
              International, IncDate: April
              6, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Michael
              RiversChief
              Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

             CERTIFICATION SOLELY TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Renal Care Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify solely to comply with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

        1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.



/s/Gary A. Brukardt
------------------------------------
Gary A. Brukardt
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003



/s/ R. Dirk Allison
------------------------------------
R. Dirk Allison
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003
583 A.2d 337

#### CHRISTIANA PARKER v. BOARD OF REVIEW AND COLLEGE FOR HUMAN SERVICES.

March 7, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
COMMEMORATIVE BRANDS, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED AUGUST 28, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-28-1999
<CASH>                                             751
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,366)
<INVENTORY>                                     13,804
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,162
<PP&E>                                          51,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,131)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 209,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,078
<BONDS>                                        134,410
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          6
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,820
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   209,845
<SALES>                                        160,308
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,308
<CGS>                                           70,824
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,824
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                78,962
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,389
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,594
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,072)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       120
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,192)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,392)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (14.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (14.31)


</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 20218 Summary Calendar

JOHN LEE BASEY, Private American National Citizen American Freeman , Petitioner

- Appellant

v. DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES; STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY , Respondent s
- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CV

- 532

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * John Lee Basey, Texas prisoner # 01632916, appeals t he district court ’s
d ismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. To the extent Basey’s claims in his § 2241 petiti on attack the validity of his
state conviction and sentence , and thus should have been construed as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application, a COA is required. See 28 U.S.C.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not prec edent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 7, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-20218 Document: 00515408082 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/07/2020No. 19

- 20218

2 § 2253(c)(1)(A); Hartfield v. Osborne , 808 F.3d 1066, 1071

– 73 (5th Cir. 2015)

. Basey’s timely notice of appeal is construed as a COA request. See F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 22(b)(2). A prisoner will receive a COA only if he show s that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s decision to deny relief debatable or wrong, Slack
v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000), or “that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further,” Miller

El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003)

. Because the district court adjudicated
all the claims in Bailey’s first § 2254 application on the merits, this second challenge was successive , and the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider
it. Se e Burton v. Stewart , 549 U.S. 147, 153 (2007); see also United States v. Key , 205 F.3d 773, 774 (5th Cir . 2000). Thus, to the extent his application should have been dismissed on that basis, a COA is denied

. See Miller

- El , 537 U.S. at 327

. To the extent Basey raises claims against the President and the Secretary of the Treasury for release of trust funds or other relief based on provisions of commercial and contract law and his status as a “private citizen,” such claims do not require a COA. However, they are patently frivolous and his appeal on those grounds is dismissed. COA DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED. Case: 19-20218 Document: 00515408082 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/07/2020
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Sean F. Moran, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sontra Medical Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: March 16, 2004   
|                       
|/s/ Sean F. Moran      
|Sean F. Moran          
|Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Didsbury, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-Q of DARA BioSciences, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of DARA BioSciences, Inc.



By:

/s/ John DidsburyName:

John DidsburyTitle:

President and Chief Operating OfficerDate:

August 14, 2008


I, John C. Thomas, Jr., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-Q of DARA BioSciences, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of DARA BioSciences, Inc.



By:

/s/ John C. Thomas, Jr.Name:

John C. Thomas, Jr.Title:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

August 14, 2008
583 A.2d 298

#### ACE IMPROVEMENTS, INC. v. TAYLOR HOME IMPROVEMENTS AND ROBERT TAYLOR.

January 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 84 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1086]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       HONORING MORTON BLEETSTEIN

                                 ______

                         HON. GARY L. ACKERMAN

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, May 18, 1995
  Mr. ACKERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I rise with great pleasure today to join 
with those most compassionate and dedicated people of the New Hope 
Community as they honor one of their most esteemed members, Morton 
Bleetstein.
  I first met Morty when I started a small business, and Morty was a 
third-generation insurance broker. But I soon learned that he has other 
interests and talents that would significantly impact on others. In the 
fields of hope, compassion and concern, there are few to equal Morty 
Bleetstein.
  As parents of two disabled children, Morty and his wife, Pat, took up 
the life challenge fate had thrust upon them, and embarked upon 
creating a service record of almost four decades on behalf of all 
disabled youngsters. Morty's early involvement led to the passage in 
New York State of legislation known as the Greenberg bill, which 
provides education for all disabled children.
  As his own kids grew, so did his dedication: the Bleetsteins became 
original founders of the New York Association for Brain Injured 
Children. Morty Bleetstein also has proudly served as president of the 
New Hope Community Parents Group, and as a board member and fund 
raising chairman for New Hope.
  Mr. Speaker, Morton Bleetstein has honored all humanity with his 
selfless dedication and perseverance on behalf of those who have 
nowhere else to turn. On May 20, the New Hope Community will honor 
Morty at a gala benefit in Flushing, Queens.
  I ask all my colleagues in the House of Representatives to join with 
me now in paying tribute to a true humanitarian, Morton Bleetstein, and 
in extending to him the great appreciation of a most grateful nation.

                          ____________________
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58386-58387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23905]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver, 
Liquidator, or Manager

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the 
following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as 
indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in 
the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ``of record'' notice that 
the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the 
statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the Federal 
Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the 
identification of any institutions which have been placed in 
liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html or contact the 
Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center.

    Dated: September 20, 2010 .

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Pamela Johnson,
Regulatory Editing Specialist.

                                           Institutions in Liquidation
                                             [In alphabetical order]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         FDIC Ref. No.                  Bank name                City                State          Date closed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10287..........................  Bank of Ellijay........  Ellijay...........  GA................       9/17/2010
10288..........................  Bramble Savings Bank...  Milford...........  OH................       9/17/2010
10289..........................  First Commerce           Douglasville......  GA................       9/17/2010
                                  Community Bank.
10290..........................  ISN Bank...............  Cherry Hill.......  NJ................       9/17/2010
10291..........................  Maritime Savings Bank..  West Allis........  WI................       9/17/2010
10292..........................  The Peoples Bank.......  Winder............  GA................       9/17/2010
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[[Page 58387]]

[FR Doc. 2010-23905 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODEP
News United States Air Force
 USAF, allies accelerate logistics interoperabilityPublished July 27, 2023
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Air forces from five allied nations consisting of the United States Air Force, **Royal Air Force**, **Royal Australian Air Force**, **Royal New Zealand Air Force** and **Canadian Air Force** partnered to advance combined logistics support for agile operations during a forum at the Pentagon July 20.
U.S. Air Force **Lt. Gen. Tom Miller**, deputy chief of staff for Logistics, Engineering and Force Protection, and U.S. Air Force **Maj. Gen. Linda Hurry**, director of Logistics and deputy chief of staff for Logistics, Engineering and Force Protection, hosted logistics counterparts for the forum, which focused on aligning with the **National Defense Strategy** to prioritize agile and responsive logistics and sustainment, while directly supporting Department of the Air Force Operational Imperatives on resilient basing and readiness to deploy and fight.

“Recognizing the changing character of war means reckoning with the challenge of contested logistics," said U.S. Air Force Vice Chief of Staff **Gen. David Allvin**, who opened the event. “Continually improving our capability to sustain **Agile Combat Employment** in close coordination with our allies is a cornerstone of integrated deterrence.”

Leaders discussed logistics strategy, combined maintenance and munitions operations, air base defense, rapid airfield damage repair, and a recent contested logistics table-top exercise. Discussions built on recent progress, such as aircraft repair and maintenance agreements for common platforms like the **C-17 Globemaster III** and **C-130 Hercules**.

“We tackled the shared challenge of contested logistics and discussed specific actions our teams are taking to remove policy obstacles, expand combined training and realize combined campaigning efforts,” Miller said. “A demonstration of this burgeoning combined logistics capability occurred during exercise **Mobility Guardian 23**, which included integrated maintenance support that allowed maintainers from different nations to fix one another’s aircraft and source shared parts.”

This is just one example of a planned expansion of logistics integration in combined exercises.

“Through our combined efforts, we will ensure logistics remains an unqualified strength of the American and allied airpower,” Miller said. “The resilience, agility and operational flexibility of our combined force rests on the adaptability of our joint logistics enterprise working hand-in-hand with our allies and partners.”FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



logistics 



United Kingdom 



Australia 



New Zealand 



Canada 



MG23 



Mobility Guardian 



interoperability 



Ace 



Agile Combat Employment 



airpower 



Teamwork 



One Team One Fight 



C-17 Globemaster III 



C-130 Hercules