alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 180 (Friday, September 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23435]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: September 22, 2010-2 p.m.

PLACE: 800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, 
Washington, DC.

STATUS: Part of the meeting will be in Open Session and the remainder 
of the meeting will be in Closed Session.

Matters To Be Considered

Open Session

    1. Staff Update on Study of European Union Block Exemption Repeal.
    2. Staff Briefing Regarding Passenger Vessel Financial 
Responsibility Notice of Inquiry Information Collection.

Closed Session

    1. Staff Briefing on Financial Responsibility of Cruise West.
    2. Staff Briefing on Economic Conditions and Impact on Stakeholder.
    3. Staff Briefing Regarding Shanghai Shipping Exchange and China 
Ministry of Transport Regulations.
    4. Fact Finding No. 27: Complaints or Inquiries from Individual 
Shippers of Household Goods or Private Automobiles--Status Report.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, (202) 
523-5725.

Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-23435 Filed 9-15-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
H. Con. Res. 88 Agreed to April 18, 2007

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas Ernest Gallo was born March 18, 1909, in Jackson, California, the son of Italian immigrants, graduated from Modesto 

High School in 1927, earned a degree from Modesto Junior College, and married Amelia Franzia, daughter of the founders of 

Franzia Winery in 1931;

Whereas Ernest Gallo, with his brother Julio Gallo, founded E.&J. 

Gallo Winery at the end of the Prohibition Era in 1933, beginning 

with only $5,900 in savings and a winemaking pamphlet from 

the Modesto Public Library to make their first batch, growing 

their small family-owned winery into the world’s second largest 

by volume, and selling an estimated 75,000,000 cases a year 

worldwide under approximately 100 different labels;

Whereas Ernest Gallo began his illustrious career at a young age, 

working in his parents’ vineyard while attending Modesto High 

School and demonstrating his entrepreneurial spirit early in life 

by traveling at the age of 17 to complete his first business 

deal;

Whereas Ernest Gallo, demonstrating great vision, anticipated the 

growth of the wine industry and developed the first-of-its kind 

vertically integrated company, with vineyards stretching across 

California, an on-site bottling plant, and an art department to 

design bottles and labels, changing the face of California’s wine 

industry;

Whereas the Gallo Winery employs 4,600 people in the State of 

California, providing critical highly-skilled employment 

opportunities in the San Joaquin Valley and greatly contributing 

to the economic strength of the State;

Whereas Ernest Gallo and the Gallo Winery were bestowed countless awards for achievement in winemaking, including the American Society of Enologists Merit Award, the wine industry’s 

highest honor, in 1964 for outstanding leadership in the wine 

industry, the Gold Vine Award from the Brotherhood of the 

Knights of the Vine wine fraternity, the 1983 Distinguished 

Service Award from The Wine Spectator, and the Winery of 

the Year Award in both 1996 and 1998 by the San Francisco 

International Wine Competition; and

Whereas Ernest Gallo was widely known for his generous philanthropic work in the City of Modesto and throughout the state 

of California, including an endowment for the Gallo Center for 

the Arts in Modesto, the establishment of the Ernest Gallo Clinic 

and Research Center at the University of California at San Francisco for research into genetic, biochemical, and neurobiological 
H. Con. Res. 88—2

aspects of alcohol abuse, and countless other healthcare and 

educational endeavors: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That Congress honors the life of Ernest Gallo, a pioneer 

in the field of winemaking, dedicated philanthropist, and community 

leader. 

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
#### Malone, Appellee, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant.

(Decided January 27, 1941.)

Messrs. *Davies, Hoover & Beall,*for appellee.

*Mr. E. A. Schott,*for appellant.

Matthews, J.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining a motion for new trial. It comes before the court on the motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the order appealed from is not a judgment or final order, and on the appellant’s motion for leave to amend the notice of appeal to show that the order appealed from was the order overruling its motions for an instructed verdict.

The notice of appeal specifically recites that the appeal is “from an entry sustaining the motion for a new trial ** *** in the above-entitled case on the 5th day of October, 1940.” There is no uncertainty in this language, and there can be no doubt as to the intention of the appellant at the time of filing the notice. Unamended, it presents the question whether this order granting a new trial in this case is appealable, as such an order has not an unvarying attribute of appealability or non-appealability. The record of the case must be examined to place it in its proper category. If the order was made as the result of an abuse *506of discretion, it is appealable. If there was no abuse of discretion, it is not appealable.

Now what is meant by an abuse of discretion in this connection? That question has been answered in the case of *Steiner*v. *Custer,*137 Ohio St., 448, 31 N. E. (2d), 855, the second paragraph of the syllabus of which is as follows:

“The meaning of the term ‘abuse of discretion’ in relation to the granting of a motion for a new trial connotes more than an error of law or of judgment; it implies an unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable attitude on the part of the court.”

In this case it is asserted that the court admitted the testimony of a company physician over the objection of the plaintiff, and on the motion for a new trial concluded that the court had erred, and on that ground, among others, granted the new trial. It is not claimed that the court acted unreasonably, arbitrarily, or unconscionably in so doing. At most, it was an error of law. The granting of a motion for a new trial under such circumstances is not appealable.

Now can the notice of appeal be amended, so as to bring before the court for review another order, or orders, that were appealable? Specifically, can this notice be amended by adding thereto notice of appeal from the orders overruling the motions for an instructed verdict? It seems to us that this would not be an amendment, but, rather, the substitution of a different notice for the one that was filed and thereby a new appeal for the one that was filed. While the court is empowered to permit amendments by Section 12223-5, General Code, we do not think such a substitution comes within either the letter or the spirit of that section. *Williams*v. *Braun,*65 Ohio App., 451, 30 N. E. (2d), 363.

The motion to amend is overruled and the motion to dismiss is granted.

7 *Appeal dismissed.*

Hamilton, P. J., and Ross, J., concur.
News United States Air Force
 Servicing support for Airmen assigned to Space Force fully operationalPublished June 4, 2022
                        
                        By Air Force Materiel Command Public Affairs
                **WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS) --**
                The**Air Force Materiel Command**reached Full Operational Capability for its servicing major command support to**Space Force**-assigned Airmen, June 1, 2022.
As the servicing MAJCOM, AFMC is accomplishing the roles and responsibilities traditionally performed by a major command for the Airmen supporting the Space Force. These major command functions include, but are not limited to, providing policy guidance; professional development opportunities/guidance; developmental team representation; and functional-specific roles.
AFMC declared Initial Operational CapabilityOct. 1, 2021, and has since been completing final actions and processes identified in a programming plan that outlined the AFMC functional support for Airmen assigned to the United States Space Force.AFMC reached FOC four months ahead of schedule when all assigned functional areas became fully supported by AFMC, and the organization hiredall the positions required to provide servicing major command support to Space Force Airmen.Airmen at USSF installations continue to be serviced by their local military personnel flight and civilian personnel office, and the**Air Force Personnel Center**continues to provide service to all Airmen at Space Force installations.
Approximately 8,000 Airmen assigned to Space Force installations and units are being serviced by AFMC.
The Department of the Air Force created this unique and first-time servicing MAJCOM structure in October 2020 to ensure Airmen assigned to the Space Force receive the same force development opportunities, functional and administrative support as those at U.S. Air Force installations.LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFMC 



Air Force Materiel Command 



space force 



servicing 



support 



fully operational
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 75 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 75

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 relating to the process by which the House of Representatives selects 
    the President in the event no candidate receives a majority of 
                            electoral votes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

Mr. Goode introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 relating to the process by which the House of Representatives selects 
    the President in the event no candidate receives a majority of 
                            electoral votes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Whenever the right to choose the President devolves 
upon the House of Representatives, the Members of the House shall cast 
votes on an individual basis, and the candidate receiving votes cast by 
a majority of the Members of the House shall be the President.
    ``Section 2. For purposes of a meeting of the House to cast votes 
under section 1, two-thirds of the Members of the House shall 
constitute a quorum.''.
                                 <all>
```
News United States Air Force
 Air University welcomes Lt. Gen. Hecker as commander, presidentPublished Nov. 22, 2019
                        
                        By Air University Public Affairs
                **MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS) --**
                Lt. Gen. James B. Hecker took over as the commander and president of Air University during an assumption of command ceremony Nov. 22, at Maxwell Air Force Base.Lt. Gen. Brad Webb, Air Education and Training Command commander, presided over the ceremony and emphasized the importance of the AU mission to the Air Force to develop leaders, enrich minds, advance airpower, build relationships and inspire service.
“Ground zero for doctrine and development resides right here at Maxwell (AFB),” Webb said. “I’m counting on Air University to ensure we lead out of the gate and pave the way for future leaders.”
Taking the podium to speak to his command for the first time, Hecker talked about the excitement of leading an institution that is the intellectual and leadership-development center of the Air Force.
“Thank you for the opportunity of command,” Hecker said. “If you look at China, if you look at Russia, they are catching up to us, if not have caught up to us when it comes to military equipment. They haven’t caught up to us in human capital and that’s what we do here: we develop and we nurture human capital. That’s what we need to have a competitive edge on our adversaries. I really look forward to working with this community to make AU, and this community, even better.”
Hecker served as the vice director of operations for the Joint Staff at the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, before taking command of AU.Maj. Gen. Brad Sullivan stood as the acting AU commander and president upon the departure of Lt. Gen. Anthony Cotton, who held the position from February 2018 to October 2019. Sullivan is serving as the deputy commander of Air Force Global Strike Command Air Forces Strategic-Air, U.S. Strategic Command at Barksdale AFB, Louisiana.
AU provides full-spectrum education, research and outreach at every level through professional military education, professional continuing education and academic degree granting, leading the intellectual and leadership center of the U.S. Air Force, graduating more than 50,000 resident and 120,000 non-resident officers, enlisted and civilian personnel each year. Additionally, AU is responsible for officer commissioning through Officer Training School and the Reserve Officer Training Corps.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Air University 



AU 



Air Education and Training Command 



AETC 



Maxwell AFB 



Lt. Gen. James B. Hecker 



Assumption of Command 



commander 



President 



education 



leaders 



leadership 



Joint Staff 



Barksdale AFB 



Air Force Global Strike Command 



AFGSC 



Air Forces Strategic-Air 



US Strategic Command 



USSTRATCOM 



Lt. Gen. Brad Webb
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# CSAF discusses opening communications with China

              - Published  Nov. 13, 2013
              -                             By Jim Garamone                                                         ** 
              - American Forces Press Service

**WASHINGTON (AFPS) --  **
Opening up lines of communication with China is good for the United States, the region and the world, the Air Force chief of staff said here Nov. 13.

Gen. Mark A. Welsh III spoke about his recent trip to China with the Defense Writers Group this morning.

The general said he was treated very well by his counterpart and that his group may have benefited from a Chinese “charm offensive” following earlier meetings between President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Welsh said he toured Chinese air bases and saw demonstrations by Chinese pilots. He was able to speak with Chinese pilots and got “up close and personal” with some Chinese aircraft, he added.

“My biggest takeaway was I think we can communicate -- we can cooperate in a way that helps prevent misinformation and miscommunication (and) accidental confrontation,” Welsh said. “There are opportunities to continue that kind of engagement.”

Military-to-military contacts will never be the main pillar of the Sino-American relationship, he said, “but I think it can be part of the connective tissue.”

The U.S. Air Force is working with the Chinese in many different areas. There are professional military education exchanges, and Chinese and American service members are working together in various exercises. The two nations are building a working relationship for search and rescue operations, the general noted, and are cooperating on disaster assistance and humanitarian relief exercises as well. One such exercise is happening right now in Hawaii, he said.

“It’s been a good initiative to get into, and if we can do nothing else, it will set a new high-water mark for military-to-military relations,” he said. “Any step forward is a good step right now.”

Improving communications will help in the long run as U.S. and Chinese forces interact on land, at sea or in the air, Welsh said.

“We will come close together more and more and more in that part of the world, and being able to communicate better is going to be a good thing,” he added.

communicationsDefense Writers GroupGen. Mark A. Welsh IIIChina
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Dec. 15Published Dec. 15, 2017
                        
                        By Airman Marqus Williams
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** – On this look around the Air Force the Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. David Goldfein announces deployment changes, and Royal Air Force joint terminal attack controllers train with Airmen in South Dakota. Hosted by Airman Marqus Williams.
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- **Air Force announces change to deployments**
- **Airmen encouraged to updated their vRED, SOES information**
- **JTACs, aircrews participate in joint exercise over PRTC**
- **Air Force Marathon to feature MQ-9 Reaper**south dakota 



MQ-9 Reaper 



raf 



JTAC 



joint terminal attack controllers 



Around the Air Force 



Featured Videos 



CSAF Gen David Goldfein 



Royal AirForce 



Deployment Change 



Amn MarqusWilliams 



ATAF 



2018 Air Force Marathon
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY CORP.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Travelers Property Casualty Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jay S. Benet, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 13th day of August, 2003

/s/ Jay S. Benet
Jay S. Benet
Chief Financial Officer
#### J. L. & M. E. Markham v. H. *&*T. C. R. R. Co.

(No. 925, Op. Book No. 3, p. 431.)

Appeal from Limestone County.

June 12, 1880.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 81. *Road crossing railroad; what is a public road.*A road within the meaning of art. 4891, Pas. Dig. (R. S. art. 4232), is a road dedicated to the public use, or commonly used and traveled by the public, and the character of the road may be established as *public*by evidence of long continued use as such. [McWhorter v. State, 43 Tex. 666.]

§ 82. *Estoppel.*Where a railroad company has recognized a road which crosses its line of railway as a public road by establishing and keeping up a crossing thereon, it will not be permitted to question the public character of such road.

Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CKE
RESTAURANTS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE 28-WEEKS ENDED AUGUST 14, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
AUGUST 14, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2001
<PERIOD-START>                              FEB-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-14-2000
<CASH>                                          24,834
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,313
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,612
<PP&E>                                       1,328,193
<DEPRECIATION>                                 357,005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,482,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          419,965
<BONDS>                                        359,225
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           521
<OTHER-SE>                                     526,771
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,482,432
<SALES>                                        914,225
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,022,826
<CGS>                                          780,508
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  995,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (16,558)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,718)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (10,337)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,381)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,381)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)


</TABLE>