alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification

I, Larry K. Hinson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Rockport Healthcare, Group, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c.   Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: June 30, 2004


/s/ Larry K. Hinson
--------------------------------
Larry K. Hinson, Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1045 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 24
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1045

                          [Report No. 110-46]

 To designate the Federal building located at 210 Walnut Street in Des 
         Moines, Iowa, as the ``Neal Smith Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2007

Mr. Boswell (for himself and Mr. Regula) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

                             March 12, 2007

 Additional sponsors: Mr. Braley of Iowa, Mr. Loebsack, and Mr. Latham

                             March 12, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the Federal building located at 210 Walnut Street in Des 
         Moines, Iowa, as the ``Neal Smith Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 210 Walnut Street in Des Moines, 
Iowa, shall be known and designated as the ``Neal Smith Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Neal Smith Federal 
Building''.
                                                  House Calendar No. 24

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1045

                          [Report No. 110-46]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the Federal building located at 210 Walnut Street in Des 
         Moines, Iowa, as the ``Neal Smith Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 12, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
#### C. B. Shepard v. Don Phears.

(No. 1175, Op. Book No. 3, p. 483.)

Appeal from Washington County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 168. *Guarantor; conditional.*S. indorsed the note of O. in these words: “I guaranty the collection of the within note.” *Held,*1. That S. was only a conditional guarantor. He did not guaranty the payment of the note absolutely and at all events. He was only bound upon condition that P., the payee of the note, should use due.diligence to collect the debt from O. [2 Dan. Neg. Inst. 649; Brandt on Suretyship, 113; Bell v. Evans, 45 Tex. 553.] 2. That P. could not recover against S. without alleging and proving that he had exhausted C.’s means of payment by due process of law, or that C. was insolvent.

§ 169. *Guarantor; demand of payment; notice.*Where the principal is alleged to he insolvent, it is not necessary, in a suit against a guarantor, to allege demand of payment, or notice, of non-payment to the guarantor. If for want of timely notice of non-payment injury has resulted to the guarantor, that is matter of defense. [Brandt on Sureties, 248.] If the notice be delayed for a very short time, hut by reason of the delay the guarantor loses th ' opportunity of obtaining indemnity, and is irreparably *68damaged, he would be discharged from his obligation. If the delay were for a long period, and it was nevertheless clear that the guarantor would have derived no benefit from an earlier notice, the delay would not impair his obligation. Whether the delay in giving notice was reasonable or unreasonable, is a mixed .question of law and fact for the jury, to be determined in view of all the circumstances of the case under proper instruction from the court.

February 5, 1881.

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4677]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                REPUBLICANS BREAK CONTRACT WITH SENIORS

  (Ms. DeLAURO asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Ms. DeLAURO. Mr. Speaker, there is a loud shattering sound all over 
Capitol Hill today as the Republicans rush to break our Nation's 
historic contract with its senior citizens.
  House Republicans today make it official: They want to cut Medicare 
and Medicaid by $464 billion in order to pay for a tax cut for the 
wealthiest Americans.
  And now they have added a new ingredient to this sickening stew. Now 
House Republicans want to redefine the Consumer Price Index and lower 
cost-of-living adjustments for Social Security recipients. So much for 
their promise to keep Social Security off the table.
  In short, the Republican plan squeezes seniors from both ends. 
Seniors would have to pay more for health care, and they would be less 
able to afford that increase because they would get a smaller Social 
Security COLA.
  Altogether, this plan would cost 37 million seniors $900 more a year 
so a lucky 1.1 million of the wealthiest taxpayers can enjoy a $20,000 
bonus.
  The Republican plan does not save Medicare. Instead it uses Medicare 
as a piggybank for tax cuts we cannot afford and do not need.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                          54,840
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  309,916
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (32,630)
<INVENTORY>                                    203,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               535,733
<PP&E>                                           6,280
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,141,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          682,062
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    24,781,897
<OTHER-SE>                                (24,323,415)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,141,382
<SALES>                                        382,746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               382,746
<CGS>                                          165,216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  407,496
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (128,203)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 566
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                102,887
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            102,887
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   102,887
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Australian air force makes home at Luke AFBPublished May 5, 2014
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Luther Mitchell Jr.
                        
                        
                        56th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. (AFNS) --**
                The buildup of F-35 operations at Luke Air Force Base has begun, and the Royal Australian air force will soon be Luke's first international partner to train here on the F-35A Lightning II.The 61st Fighter Squadron and 61st Aircraft Maintenance Unit will house the RAAF personnel. The goal is to build a cohesive, working understanding of the F-35A program with Luke's international partners for increased success in joint operations."It's one more step in the long road to making this aircraft combat capable," said Capt. Dan Langan, the 61st AMU officer in-charge. "The idea is, in future conflicts nobody is going to be going at it alone. We'll have our allies with us. The idea behind this aircraft was to make it easier to operate with our multinational partners, understand the same tactics, operate with the same logistics base, and figuring out how to do that starts right here. We are laying the foundation and it's pretty exciting to be on the ground floor of that effort."Luke will act as ground zero for international partners to build their expertise in F-35A operations. The RAAF is the first partner to start their spin-up operations and are expecting their first aircraft by the end of this year."We are really pleased to come in and be the first partner to stand up operations here," said squadron leader Maj. Nathan Draper, the 61st AMU participant maintenance liaison officer and RAAF senior officer. "We are pretty lucky to get to come here first."The RAAF plans to eventually have 14 aircraft at Luke, with their goal to have a complete working picture of U.S. Air Force F-35 operations, then return to the home base they are setting up for the F-35."One of the biggest things I hope to achieve is the successful transition of our aircraft from the production line to the Luke training environment and the commencement of training operations alongside our Air Force colleagues," Draper said. "If we can do that in a safe and efficient streamlined manner, leveraging the Air Force processes and systems, it will be a pretty good day."The RAAF expects their first pilot to arrive at Luke the beginning of next year. Draper is part of an acquisition project called Joint Strike Fighter Division, and he now considers himself a team member of the 61st AMU."We have a really good, close working relationship with our colleagues in the Air Force, and we are looking forward to the next few years of joint operations here," he said.Luke's relationship with the RAAF goes back a long way. Air Marshal Mark Binskin, soon to be the top Australian Defence Force officer, was stationed at Luke in the late '80s.Follow-on squadrons are scheduled to bring in additional partner countries including Italy, Norway, Canada, Turkey and the Netherlands.F-35 



Luke AFB 



Airmen 



joint forces
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2016

a1212 

# Order

Clerk December 28, 2016

153673

- 4

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153673

- 4

COA: 324607; 324608

Wayne CC: 12

- 004096

- FC;

CHARLES FRAZIER YOUNG, 12

- 004097

- FH

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 10, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
News United States Air Force
 The Air Force releases commemorative 75th Anniversary poster seriesPublished Sept. 21, 2022
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force is releasing a commemorative 75th Anniversary poster series highlighting this year's theme, "Innovate, Accelerate, Thrive ... the Air Force at 75." The collection spans decades showcasing major Air Force events, achievements and accomplishments Airmen reached on the battlefield while overcoming social and economic obstacles. The series also commemorates historical figures who persevered and paved a pathway for future Airmen and revolutionary triumphs in America's defense against past and present adversaries.   
  
Today's Airmen continue to Fly, Fight, and Win in ever-changing environments as they have done since the creation of the Air Force in 1947. Rooted in joint service, today's Air Force urges Airmen to collaborate and innovate in joint operations across all domains, reinforcing modernization, competition and barrier-breaking warfighting.  
 
The official U.S. Air Force **75th Anniversary** poster series and more can be found by visiting the **Air Force Posters** page.Air Force 75th Anniversary 



posters 



series 



history 



birthday 



graphics 



Celebration 



prints 



accelerate change 



thrive 



innovate 



accelerate 



fight and win 



download 



Airmen 



families 



core values 



af75
News United States Air Force
 Munitions Airmen provide the means for combat airpowerPublished June 20, 2015
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Joseph Swafford
                        
                        
                        455th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs
                **BAGRAM AIRFIELD, Afghanistan (AFNS) --**
                Munitions Airmen assigned to the 455th Expeditionary Maintenance Squadron make an impact here every day by building the weapons needed for the combat airpower mission.
Every munition loaded onto an F-16 Fighting Falcon aircraft at Bagram Airfield is provided by the 455th EMXS Munitions Flight. Without these Airmen, the Fighting Falcons wouldn’t be able to provide combat airpower in Afghanistan.
“Our work here directly affects the entire wing; without munitions it’s hard to complete the combat airpower mission here,” said Staff Sgt. Luis Soto, the 455th EMXS Munitions Flight conventional maintenance/precision guided munitions production superintendent. “We provide the munitions for aircraft to provide support for the ground troops or to hit targets that need to be taken care of.”
A critical part of their job is to inspect each munition to ensure it will perform as expected when used.
“With the weather changing here often we have to make sure all the components on the inside have not been affected by the environment,” Soto said. “The only way to do that is to tear down the bombs and inspect all the components to make sure they are still working. Then we build it back up and test the munition as a whole to make sure it can do what it is meant to do.”
Being in a combat environment allows the munitions Airmen to put their training to the test.
“Coming to Bagram and being able to apply all our knowledge and what we have learned at Aviano (Air Base, Italy) is rewarding,” Soto said. “It’s nice to see a trailer leave with munitions and come back empty. At the end of the day those munitions could have saved Soldiers or hit targets that needed to be destroyed.”
For Senior Airman Michael Rose, a 455th EXMS Munitions Flight conventional maintenance crew chief, Bagram is a familiar place and he said he can see the impact his unit has.
“This is my second time here and it is definitely more fulfilling than a training mission,” Rose said. “We are actually out here doing something. The bombs go out there and they don’t come back. The best part is working with the team here, making sure everything is good and that we are supporting the mission and protecting lives.”AFCENT 



Bagram Airfield 



Afghanistan 



airpower 



455th Expeditionary Maintenance Squadron 



F-16 Fighting Falcon 



f-16 



munitions
#### IN THE MATTER OF C. S.

February 28, 1978.

Certification to Hunterdon County Court is granted.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GEORGE LEE POWELL, JR.

March 13, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### M. B. Yarborough v. J. E. Downes.

(No. 308, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 206.)

Appeal from Houston County.

January 30, 1878.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 675. *Trial of the right of property; jurisdiction determined by the court from which execution issued.*It is insisted that the justice’s court did not have jurisdiction, because the cotton in controversy was worth more than $100. [Case was tried in 1874.] The jurisdiction is determined by the court from which the writ of execution issued. The execution having issued from a justice’s court, it was, with the indorsement thereon, made returnable with the claimant’s affidavit and bond to the justice court from which the execution issued, which was the proper court to try the case. [Pas. Dig. arts. 5311, 5313.]

Note.— This is not now the law. [Rev. Stats, art. 4831; see, also, *ante,*§ 573.]

§ 676. *Motion for new trial; if filed too late.*The motion for new trial was not filed in the time required by law; and the time when defendant’s agent ascertained when the judgment had been rendered is too indefinitely stated. We will not revise the judicial discretion of the lower court in refusing the motion. There is nothing in the record to show that this discretion was abused. It is not sufficiently shown by the motion that appellant had a good and meritorious defense. His defense should have been set out fully in the motion. It is not sufficient for affiant to say that he believes appellant has a valid,, legal and equitable defense in the cause. That is a matter to be judged of by the court, and the motion should set out clearly in what the defense consists, in order that the: court might judge of its sufficiency.

Affirmed..
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1074]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               CONGRATULATIONS TO MICHAEL AND BETSY GREEN

                                 ______

                         HON. THOMAS M. BARRETT

                              of wisconsin

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, May 18, 1995
  Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin. Mr. Speaker, today I congratulate Michael 
and Betsy Green who have been chosen as recipients of the Human 
Relations Award by the Milwaukee chapter of the American Jewish 
Committee.
  The Human Relations Award is given annually to leaders in the 
community for exemplary dedication to the principles of pursuit of 
community understanding and dedication to social and economic justice 
for all.
  Betsy and Michael Green have certainly earned this award through 
their volunteer and professional activities.
  Betsy Green is the immediate past president of the Milwaukee Jewish 
Federation and the current chairperson of the Jewish Community 
Foundation. Betsy's achievements have been recognized with the 
Milwaukee Jewish Federation Young Leadership Award and the Esther Cohen 
Women's Community Service Award. Betsy is one of the founders of the 
Wisconsin Research Center, a group devoted to pluralism in our society.
  Michael also has received the Milwaukee Jewish Federation Young 
Leadership Award and has served as a volunteer publisher of the 
Wisconsin Jewish Chronicle. Currently, Michael is the National Chairman 
of the United Jewish Appeal and will assume the chairmanship of the 
midwest region next month. Michael also has a commitment to creating 
opportunities in business for minorities with his work with the Jewish 
Foundation of Economic Opportunity.
  Michael and Betsy Green are dedicated to making Milwaukee a community 
which nurtures and appreciates diversity. I am honored to have the 
Greens as constituents. I congratulate them for being selected as 
recipients of the American Jewish Committee's Human Relations Award.

                          ____________________
```