alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 3.5

                           COMMEMORATIVE BRANDS, INC.

                             CERTIFICATE OF INCREASE

                                       OF

                            SERIES B PREFERRED STOCK

          The undersigned, being the duly elected and acting vice-president, 
secretary and treasurer of COMMEMORATIVE BRANDS, INC., a corporation 
organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of 
the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT:

          1.   A Certificate of Designations of Series B Preferred Stock setting
forth the Powers, Preferences, Rights, Qualifications, Limitations and
Restrictions of Such Preferred Stock was filed by the Corporation with the
Secretary of State of Delaware on December 13, 1996; and

          2.   Pursuant to Section 151 of the Delaware General Corporation Law,
the Board of Directors of the Corporation duly adopted the following
resolution by unanimous written consent dated June 2, 1998:

               RESOLVED that, pursuant to the authority vested in the Board of
          Directors of the Corporation by the provisions of the Certificate of
          Incorporation of the Corporation, as amended, the number of shares of
          the Corporation to be designated as Series B Preferred Stock is hereby
          increased by 50,000 shares (the "Additional Series B Shares"); and
          such Additional Series B Shares shall have the same Powers,
          Preferences, Rights, Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions as
          the Series B Preferred Stock so designated prior to the date hereof as
          set forth in that certain Certificate of Designations of Series B
          Preferred Stock filed by the Corporation with the Secretary of State
          of the State of Delaware on December 13, 1996.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate
of Increase on behalf of the Corporation this 10th day of June, 1998.


                                 COMMEMORATIVE BRANDS, INC.

                                 By: /s/ Clyde W. Walls
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                 Name: Clyde W. Walls
                                 Title: Vice-President, Secretary and Treasurer
#### A. P. NEWMAN v. FLOUR CITY FUEL & TRANSFER COMPANY.2

January 2, 1920.

No. 21,541.

Case followed.

Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $525, the value of an automobile. The defense set up in the answer was that the (Storage of automobiles was accepted only on condition defendant would not be re*474sponsible for their loss by fire or theft. The ease was tried before Charles 'Ii. Smith, J., who at the close of the testimony denied motions by both parties for directed verdicts, and a jury which returned a verdict for $5:30. From an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding.the verdict or for a new trial in case plaintiff consented to a reduction of the verdict to $525, defendant appealed.

Affirmed.

*Adolph E. L. Johnson,*for appellant.

(7. *A. Will,*for respondent.

2

 Reported in 175 N. W. 682.

Per Curiam.

This case and the case of Steenson against the same defendant, supra, page 375, 175 N. W. 681, were tried together before the same jury. The facts in the two case's were identical, except that Steenson’s automobile was worth slightly more than Newman’s and this case is affirmed under the opinion filed in that case.

Affirmed.
#### Ron OLIVER, President, First Arkansas Bail Bonds, Inc., *Petitioner v.*PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, *Respondent;*Jamie Mann and Affordable Bail Bonds, Inc., *Interveners*

00-33

8 S.W.3d 35

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered January 20, 2000

*Gruber Law Firm,*by: *Wayne A. Gruber,*for petitioner.

No response.

PER CURIAM.

On January 11, 2000, Ron Oliver, president of First Arkansas Bail Bonds, Inc., filed a petition for writ of prohibition in this court pertaining to the taking of his deposition by Jamie Mann and Affordable Bail Bonds, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Mann). Oliver contends in his petition that the circuit court lacks jurisdiction to subpoena him and his records for a deposition once that court remands the matter to an administrative board. Oliver also filed an Application for Temporary Relief to stay all further action relating to the deposition pending a decision on his prohibition petition.

The facts leading up to Oliver’s petition are these. Mann received an adverse decision from the Professional Bail Bondsman *200Licensing Board and filed a petition for judicial review in the Pulaski County Circuit Court with the Licensing Board and Arkansas Professional Bail Bond Company as respondents. On September 14, 1999, the circuit court, by agreement of the parties, remanded the matter back to the Licensing Board for the presentation of additional evidence and for additional findings by that board, if necessary. Thereafter, Mann sought to take Oliver’s deposition, and on September 23, 1999, a subpoena duces tecum was issued to Oliver by the Pulaski County Circuit Clerk and served by the Pulaski County Sheriff’s office. Mann’s notice of the Oliver deposition which was rescheduled for January 12, 2000, was filed on January 10, 2000, with the Pulaski County Circuit Clerk. Oliver moved to quash the deposition, and the circuit court denied the motion. Oliver’s petition for a writ of prohibition followed.

Oliver’s petition in this court raises the novel issue of whether the circuit court loses jurisdiction once the matter is remanded to the administrative board for additional proceedings. We ask for simultaneous briefs on this issue to be filed with this court by the parties and interveners no later than close of business on Thursday, February 3, 2000, and reply briefs filed by Thursday, February 10, 2000. Mann has filed a motion to intervene in the matter now pending before this court. That motion is granted.

The deposition of Oliver pursuant to the subpoena issued by the circuit clerk is temporarily stayed pending the resolution of the jurisdictional question. The motion for clarification filed by the interveners with respect to a hearing to be held before the Licensing Board on January 14, 2000, is denied.
News United States Air Force
 Nepal relief airlift expands with deployment of Yokota aircraftPublished May 7, 2015
                        
                        By 374th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **YOKOTA AIR BASE, Japan (AFNS) --**
                As U.S. efforts to support the government of Nepal is recovering from the earthquake that struck the country April 25, the 374th Airlift Wing here sent four C-130 Hercules and accompanying personnel to aid Joint Task Force-505 (JTF) in its mission.The 7.8 magnitude earthquake devastated Central Nepal, resulting in more than 7,000 people reported dead and 14,000 more reported injured in days since the incident.As the only tactical airlift capability in the Western Pacific, Yokota Air Base’s 36th Airlift Squadron is extremely capable of supporting the JTF in its efforts, as they consistently train and exercise to operate in the same type of environment, says Capt. Mark Nexon, a C-130 H pilot assigned to the 36 AS.According to Nexon, C-130s from Yokota have a practiced, proven ability to support the JTF in delivering dire supplies to remote areas that have been cut off from traditional supply routes in Nepal."As PACAF's airlift wing, we are ready to assist USAID (United States Agency for International Development) and the JTF in providing support to the people and the government of Nepal," said Col. Douglas Delamater, the 374 AW commander. "It is our priority to assist the Nepalese people in their time of need, and our annual preparedness allows us to have confidence in knowing that the job -- delivering life-saving supplies to the hard-to-reach areas of Nepal -- will be safely accomplished."Personnel leaving Yokota to join the JTF include enough maintainers, security force professionals, logisticians contracting personnel and other critical specialties to sustain operations for up to 30 days.Additionally, an emergency medical package with doctors, nurses and medical technicians is also joining the support effort. The expeditionary medical system includes a five-man surgical team consisting of a general surgeon, an anesthesia provider, an orthopedic surgeon, an operating room nurse and an emergency response doctor. Additionally, 374 AW deployed personnel to support the USAID and the overall U.S. government effort to support Nepal's request for humanitarian assistance."We continuously work with our partners across the region to build trust and create an environment of familiarization," Delamater said. "It is these relationships that allow us to quickly respond to contingencies that arise in the Pacific."Yokota AB 



Nepal 



humanitarian support 



earthquake 



PACAF
News United States Air Force
 DAF announces overseas spouse direct-hire authority pilot programPublished Feb. 2, 2023
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Civilian spouses of service members assigned outside the U.S. may now have an easier time finding employment.

The Department of the Air Force has implemented a direct-hire authority pilot program for locations outside the U.S. authorized by the **National Defense Authorization Act of FY22**. This authority enables officials to quickly hire qualifying spouses for certain positions on a temporary basis. The pilot program is available for overseas positions as determined by the hiring officials; previously, military spouses could only be selected from competitive hiring procedures.

Direct-hire authority enables an agency to hire any qualified applicant through an expedited hiring process that eliminates many of the traditional steps, including consideration of competitive rankings and ratings.

“We recognize that spouse employment is a fundamental quality of life issue for our Airmen and **Guardians**, especially for families in overseas locations,” said **John Carbone**, director of civilian force management, Air Force Manpower, Personnel and Services. “We’re hoping having access to this new hiring authority will open up greater employment opportunities for spouses, which in turn will positively impact military retention, the financial wellbeing of the family, and Department of the Air Force readiness.”

The positions must be permanently located overseas, under the general schedule or federal wage system, and GS-15 and below and equivalent.

Additionally, spouses must be on the service member’s permanent change of duty station orders at government expense, within the local community area of the duty location and reside with the service member.

The initial employment appointment will not exceed two years and can be extended in two-year increments for no more than a total of six years. The appointments will end when the service member transfers back to the U.S. or to another overseas assignment. They may also end due to divorce, death of the sponsor or upon the sponsor’s retirement or separation from active duty.

Spouses interested in applying for civil service employment can visit the **Air Force Civilian Service site** to search for jobs being filled using the direct-hire authority process. Additionally, local civilian personnel offices can provide assistance and information.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Air Force Civilian Service 



overseas 



OCONUS 



employment 



manpower 



spouses 



direct-hire 



finances 



National Defense Authorization Act 



force management 



pilot program 



readiness 



One Team One Fight 



retention 



well-being 



family 



civilian 



Civilian force management
#### LORRAINE LAURA v. ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY.

February 3, 1984.

This matter having been duly considered and the Court having determined that certification was improvidently granted;

It is ORDERED that the within appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

Justices Clifford, Handler, Pollock and Garibaldi join in this order. Chief Justice Wilentz and Justices Schreiber and O’Hern dissent from this order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-3-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-3-1999
<CASH>                                         112,511
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,112,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                   144,250
<INVENTORY>                                 11,617,297
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,344,978
<PP&E>                                      28,030,358
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,231,961
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,558,811
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,600,009
<BONDS>                                     20,886,241
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,673     
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,887,888
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,558,811
<SALES>                                     15,170,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,170,285
<CGS>                                       12,776,383
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,133,259
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             635,392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                426,790
<INCOME-TAX>                                   140,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            285,990
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   285,990
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
#### A. Hinchman v. J. W. Riggins.

(No. 2435, R. Book No. 4, p. 261.)

Appeal from McLennan County.

November 21, 1882.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 294. *Joint obligors; non-joinder of, how pleaded.*It is a general and fundamental rule in common law-pleading, where the action is upon a joint obligation, that all the joint obligors should be made defendants. But a non-joinder of parties defendant can only be taken advantage of by plea in abatement, except where it is shown in the petition that the party who is omitted is living, and then, as, the abatable matter appears in the petition, it may be reached by demurrer. [Davis v. Willis, 41 Tex. 154.]

§ 295. *Common law rule of pleading changed by statute.*Article 1201, Bev. Stats., which provides that “any principal obligor in *any*contract may be sued *either alone*or jointly with any other party thereon,” changes the common law rule above noted, and makes it no longer necessary to join as defendants all joint obligors in a suit upon a joint contract. This is the first case in which this statute has been construed and applied since its adoption.

Beversed and remanded.
News United States Air Force
 Hurricane Hunters wrap up Hurricane Sam missionsPublished Oct. 10, 2021
                        
                        By Master Sgt. Jessica Kendziorek
                        
                        
                        403rd Wing Public Affairs
                **ST. CROIX, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS --**
                The Air Force Reserve’s **53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron** Hurricane Hunters, from **Keesler Air Force Base**, Mississippi, completed their final flight into **Hurricane Sam**, Oct. 2, which still churns in the Atlantic, but due to its location and the discontinuation of the tropical storm warnings, has been downgraded from a category four storm.
The squadron began flying the storm after moving to their forward operating location in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, where their first flight into Hurricane Sam was as a category three before it strengthened back into a category four storm.
“The reasons we used our forward operating location at St. Croix, was first, because with the location of the storm, St. Croix was our safest and best option for flying Hurricane Sam,” said Lt. Col. Phillip Dobson, 53rd WRS navigator and mission commander for Hurricane Sam operations. “And the second reason is that we already have our equipment and a working relationship with the airfield in place to keep operations going 24 hours a day.”
The 53rd WRS is assigned to the 403rd Wing and is the only unit of its kind in the **Defense Department**. In coordination with the **National Hurricane Center** and the Chief, **Aerial Reconnaissance Coordination All Hurricanes**, the unit flies missions into tropical systems to collect atmospheric data used by forecasters to create more accurate models.
To accomplish their mission, the squadron has 10 **WC-130J Super Hercules**, which contain two specially modified weather stations inside the aircraft for the weather missions, the aerial reconnaissance weather officer (ARWO) station and the dropsonde operator station and tube. The information collected during the flights is sent to these two stations, which is then sent back to the NHC via satellite, where they take the data and put it into their models for more accurate, up-to-date forecasts.
After a total of 10 storm missions, the 53rd WRS wrapped up their last flight and the deployed aircraft made their way back home.
“There are challenges that come up with each deployment and every (deployment) is different, just like every storm is different,” Dobson said. “We will debrief, review and improve, but at the end of the day, we are going to do what must be done to complete our mission and get the data to the NHC so they can get the forecast models out to people to be prepared.”AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFRC 



Air Force Reserve Command 



hurricane 



WC-130J 



Super Hercules 



St. Croix 



U.S. Virgin Islands 



National Hurricane Center 



NHC 



Keesler Air Force Base 



weather
News United States Air Force
 TRICARE Nurse Advice Line offers health care guidancePublished July 24, 2014
                **BETHESDA, Md. (AFNS) --**
                TRICARE beneficiaries in the continental U.S., Alaska and Hawaii can now access the Nurse Advice Line to receive health care guidance and advice.The service, launched in April 2014, offers professional help by phone at a moment’s notice, officials said.“Our mission at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center is to provide patient-friendly access to high-quality health care for all we are privileged to serve -- service members and their families, (and) our retirees and their families,” said Army Brig. Gen. (Dr.) Jeffrey B. Clark, the medical center’s director.The Nurse Advice Line is manned by a team of registered nurses -- available 24/7 -- prepared to answer questions about a variety of acute health care concerns. A nurse will help beneficiaries decide whether self-care or seeing a health care provider is the better option, officials said.Beneficiaries are routed to the appropriate nurse, who will follow up when necessary or requested. Same-day appointments with a primary care manager are available for TRICARE Prime beneficiaries who are enrolled at military treatment facilities.If a same-day appointment is not available, the Nurse Help Line will redirect the beneficiary to the closest urgent care center without any point-of-service copayment, officials said,.The Nurse Advice Line is available to TRICARE beneficiaries using TRICARE Prime, TRICARE Prime Remote, TRICARE Prime Remote for active-duty family members, TRICARE Standard and TRICARE Extra, TRICARE Reserve Select, TRICARE Retired Reserve, TRICARE Young Adult and TRICARE For Life.To contact the Nurse Advice Line, call 1-800-TRICARE (1-800-874-2273) and select Option 1 for help with urgent care questions and needs.Nurse Advice Line 



healthcare 



Air Force Medical Service 



TRICARE
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Martha L. Long, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Davidson Diversified Real Estate III, L.P.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2007

/s/Martha L. Long

Martha L. Long

Senior Vice President of Davidson Diversified Properties, Inc., equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership