alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Air Force civilian ensures efficient missile maintenancePublished March 11, 2015
                        
                        By Senior Airman Sean D. Smith
                        
                        
                        Minot Air Force Base Public Affairs
                **MINOT AIR FORCE BASE, N.D. (AFNS) --**
                The Leo Marquez Award recognizes Air Force personnel for outstanding performance in areas like financial efficiency and managerial skills.This year, the award went to Robert Mintie, a 91st Maintenance Operations Squadron production controller here.Mintie manages large-scale maintenance on missile sites, long-range maintenance programs and sustainment and modification programs. He also won the Leo Marquez, at the Air Force level, in 2009."We have depot maintenance teams that are on a constant schedule," Mintie said. "They go out and do site refurbishment for the longevity of the sites. It's coordinating all that, when you have one site undergoing maintenance you have to make sure the right people are there."Mintie's role deals heavily with time and resource management."With missile sites, since they're all so spread out, you want to do everything you can while you're out there," Mintie said. "So you coordinate what you can. If the site is under maintenance for a certain program, is there anything else we can get done while we're all out there?"Mintie said he is only one of several individuals who work to keep maintenance scheduling as efficient and economical as possible."A small part of what I do is reactionary, like if something breaks suddenly," Mintie said.When that happens, Mintie tries to work that repair into the existing schedule with the least possible disruption."I make sure there's no work stoppage," Mintie said. "When you take a site down for this maintenance, a lot of people need to know you can't just shut it down."Mintie's task is to save the Air Force time and money, and if these awards give any indication, he's doing a good job."Bob is a critical part of the 91st Maintenance Group's day-to-day operations," said Capt. Justin Ahrens, the 91st Maintenance Operations Squadron maintenance operations flight commander. "He has a vast amount of experience, knowledge and longevity which provides the group with much needed continuity to the Plans and Scheduling section.""With all the activity that goes on in the missile fields, you need a central point of coordination," Mintie said. "It's to keep things moving, keep people from bumping into each other and make sure they're making the most of their time and resources."Leo Marquez Award 



financial efficiency 



Minot 



Mintie
#### Sunn *v.*Martin.

[No. 19,211.

Filed October 9, 1959.]

*John D. Clouse,*of Evansville, for appellant.

*Victor Ahrens,*of Evansville, for appellee.

Ryan, J.

This is an appeal from an action by the appellee as plaintiff against the appellant as defendant to recover upon a promissory note. Judgment was rendered in favor of the appellee and after the over*30ruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial this appeal followed.

No brief has been filed by the appellee in support of the trial court’s judgment.

Where no brief is filed by the appellee the judgment may be reversed if the appellant’s brief presents a prima facie case of error. As has been stated many times, this rule is not for the benefit of the appellant but for the protection of the court, so that the court might be relieved of the burden of controverting the arguments and contentions advanced for a reversal of the trial court where such burden properly rests upon the appellee. *Newton d/b/a, etc.*v. *Hunt d/b/a, etc.*(1957), 127 Ind. App. 458, 142 N. E. 2d 643; *Whitaker*v. *Whitaker*(1958), 128 Ind. App. 247, 147 N. E. 2d 596; I. L. E. Appeals, §394.

The appellant’s brief which is filed herein in support of its appeal from the judgment does in our opinion make a prima facie showing of reversible error.

The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to sustain the motion for a new trial.

Myers, P. J., Ax, Cooper, JJ., concurring.

Note. — Reported in 161 N. E. 2d 487.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

enWatSehoo1 

e askmd a6 ror 

e* or noticor 

on that only mob 

la, the partIn@ OS rrotioe 

dtrtriot, mu all the law 

e Baoretarg or the Board 

Ropre8ontatl70 IlWiakann &ate& 

wa s l a a o teb 4 y the mo ent Legi~- 

qulrlng mtiee by publioatlon a8 

ing 0r not100 r0r the irmanoe at fnhoor dlstri6t bonds. Xi WV& a JAW 

wa8 paased aame has not aa ye@ becm readrob here. 

l Will you thereore pleara a&rise whether Or 

not notiee by piublloation 1s regitriwd ror the 

mtloe or IIQ ePe&lon to Be hdb for the i88wmee 

or boadm br an la&ape&eat rohaol bfrtriottw 
Honomble We ir. &fuller, pa@ #2 

The question submitted by you ia oontrolled by 

Article 2789, Vernon~s Annotated Civil Statutes, which 

reds, in part, a8 r0lim8: 

* * * * On presentation 0r oald petition, 

aald orriaar or orrfoon rhall order an eleotlon for auoh purpo8e, and order the l herlrr 

to poet aotioea thereor in tbroe (S) plaoe8 

in the dietriot for tea (10) days prior thereto, or if r0r an inds~naent dmriot, the 

seoretary of skid board or trustees #hall poat 

auoh notloea. * * ** 

Thererore, you are re8peotfully adrlsed that the 

oalg notice required is that rtated In the above quoted 

artlola, whioh requires said notloe of the lssuanoe oi 

bonda by any independent rahool district to be posted la 

threa pub110 plaoee ten (10) &aye prior to the elcotion. 

In uonneotlon with this request wa have oatefully 

studicb Hour8 Bill 195, Fwty-seventh Legislaturs, aul we 

are of the opinion that this bill does not apply to lnboper&e& school Ulstrist bon4 eleotione. 

very truly purs
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6132

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ERNEST MICHAEL BROWN, a/k/a Rock, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-97- 15-MJG, CA-00-2641-MJG) Submitted: March 6, 2001 Decided: March 23, 2001 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Ernest Michael Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ernest Michael Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) and the order denying his motion to supplement the § 2255 motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’sorders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Brown , Nos. CR-97-15- MJG; CA-00-2641-MJG (D. Md. Jan. 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
583 A.2d 344

#### KELLY ANN APGAR v. THE UPJOHN COMPANY, ETC.

March 20, 1990.

Leave to. appeal granted.
EXHIBIT 10.34

                                        December 7, 1999

To: Purchasers of Units (each a "Lender" and collectively the
"Lenders") consisting of $200,000 principal amount of 16% Senior
Secured Notes of World Wireless Communications, Inc. (the "Company")

     Re:  Waiver of Principal Payment Default under Agreements

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Reference is made to the Loan Agreement between the Lenders and
the Company dated as of May 14, 1999 (the "Agreement"), including
each note attached thereto as Exhibit A (the "Note"), and the
Pledge/Security Agreement attached thereto as Exhibit B (the
"Pledge\Security Agreement").

     As an inducement for the Company to consummate an offering of
its common stock pursuant to the Confidential Private Placement
Memorandum dated January 24, 1999, as amended (the "Offering"), the
Company and each Lender agree as follows:

     1. The Company hereby delivers to each Lender his, her or its
pro rata share of 200,000 shares of the Company's common stock,
which are subject to applicable securities laws restrictions,
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged.

     2.   The parties agree that the principal payment due on each
Note held by the Lenders who are signatories hereto as of today of
$744,828 shall be deferred until February 15, 2000and shall become
due and payable on such date, together with the interest otherwise
due on each Note on such date.

     3.   In consideration therefore, each Lender unconditionally
and irrevocably waives the Company's default under Sections 1, 3(a)
and 4(a) of each Note and Section 2.2 (c)(i) of the Pledge\Security
Agreement, including, without limitation, any and all rights and
remedies set forth therein, effective as of the date hereof.

           Except as amended as set forth herein, the Agreement,
each Note and the Pledge\Security Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect.

           If this letter accurately sets forth our understanding,
please sign your name below and return your signed original to us
immediately.

                                          Very truly yours,

                                          WORLD WIRELESS COMMUNICATION


                                           By: /s/ David D. Singer
                                           --------------------------
                                           David D. Singer, President


AGREED:

LANCER OFFSHORE, INC.                      THE ORBITER FUND

By:______________________                By:_________________
   Michael Lauer, President                 Michael Lauer, President


STERLING TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC

By:____________________________
      Bruce D. Cowen, President
                                           By:__________________
                                              James Kelly

                                            By:__________________
                                             K.R. Braithwaite
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1124 

AN ACT 

To extend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 

1999. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1124 EH

1 SECTION 1. 5–YEAR REAUTHORIZATION OF TUITION AS2 SISTANCE PROGRAMS. 

3 (a) PUBLIC SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 3(i) of the 

4 District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 (sec. 38– 

5 2702(i), DC Official Code) is amended by striking ‘‘each 

6 of the 7 succeeding fiscal years’’ and inserting ‘‘each of 

7 the 12 succeeding fiscal years’’. 

8 (b) PRIVATE SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 5(f) of 

9 such Act (sec. 38–2704(f), DC Official Code) is amended 

10 by striking ‘‘each of the 7 succeeding fiscal years’’ and 

11 inserting ‘‘each of the 12 succeeding fiscal years’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1124 

AN ACT 

To extend the District of Columbia College Access 

Act of 1999.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 75 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the global use of child soldiers is 

unacceptable and that the international community should find remedies 

to end this practice. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2007 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas (for herself and Mr. HONDA) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the global use of 

child soldiers is unacceptable and that the international 

community should find remedies to end this practice. 

Whereas the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the 

Child promotes principles in the best interests of the 

child and the United Nations Commission on Human 

Rights, in its Resolution 1999/80 on the Rights of the 

Child, has reaffirmed the urgent need to raise to 18 years 

the current minimum age limit set by article 38 of the 

Convention on the Rights of the Child on the recruitment 

and participation of any persons on armed conflict; 

Whereas, despite the efforts of the world community to address the effects of war on children, more than 3,000,000 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 75 IH 

children under 18 years of age are currently participating 

in armed conflicts worldwide; 

Whereas the Rome Statute of the International Criminal 

Court (1998) characterized as a war crime the conscripting to enlist or enlisting of children under the age 

of 15 into the national armed forces of a country or 

using such children to participate actively in hostilities; 

Whereas the General Conference of the International Labor 

Organization adopted Convention 182 (1999) prohibiting 

forced or compulsory recruitment of children under the 

age of 18 for use in armed conflict, and the ILO recommends in its Recommendation 190 that governments 

also prohibit, as a criminal offense, the use, procuring, or 

offering of a child for activities which involve the unlawful carrying or use of firearms or other weapons; and 

Whereas the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1261 (1999) condemning the targeting of children 

in situations of armed conflict, including killing and 

maiming, sexual violence, abduction and forced displacement, recruitment and use of children in armed conflict 

in violation of international law, and attacks on objects 

protected under international law, including places that 

usually have a significant presence of children, such as 

schools and hospitals, and calling on all parties concerned 

to put an end to such practices: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the glob3 al use of child soldiers is unacceptable and that the interVerDate Aug 31 2005 23:18 Feb 28, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HC75.IH HC75

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 75 IH 

1 national community should find remedies to end this prac2 tice. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of NMC Global Corporation, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, NMC Global Corporation, 650 Groves Road Suite 111, Thorofare, NJ 08086, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                    

*http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​.*

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of NMC Global Corporation, as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on July 25, 2007. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for July 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anthony Malana, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: September 13, 2010.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. 2010-23484 Filed 9-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 9 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 9

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
    authorizing the Congress and the States to prohibit the act of 
   desecration of the flag of the United States and to set criminal 
                        penalties for that act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2007

   Mrs. Emerson introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
    authorizing the Congress and the States to prohibit the act of 
   desecration of the flag of the United States and to set criminal 
                        penalties for that act.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``The Congress and the States shall have power to prohibit the act 
of desecration of the flag of the United States and to set criminal 
penalties for that act.''.
                                 <all>
```
760 A.2d 847

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Marilyn Al KHAFIZ, Respondent.

No. 594 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Oct. 5, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of October, 2000, there having been filed with this Court by Marilyn A1 Khafiz her verified Statement of Resignation dated August 28, 2000, stating that she desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Marilyn A1 Khafiz be and it is hereby accepted and she is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further ORDERED that she shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
Exhibit 23.1



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-118432, 333-69241, 333-36286, 333-36278, 333-60010, 333-86772, 333-107452, 333-118432 ) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan and the
1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-37385) pertaining to the 1995 Flexible Stock Incentive Plan and the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-24941, 333-77723) pertaining to the 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-66445) pertaining to the WebLogic, Inc 1996 Stock Plan.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (5) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-77725, 333-87301) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (6) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-92257) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (7) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-67646) pertaining to CrossGain Corporation, Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Plan.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (8) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 Nos. 333-58439, 333-63117, 333-66443, 333-34956, 333-92085, 333-32348, 333-40582, 333-67644, 333-83642 ) of BEA Systems, Inc.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



of our reports dated April 13, 2005, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of BEA Systems, Inc., BEA Systems, Inc.s managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of BEA Systems, Inc included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 2005.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP



San Jose, California

April 13, 2005