alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Jay S. Amato, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ViewpointCorporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors:
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Dated: November 15, 2004 By: /s/ JAY S. AMATO       Jay S. AmatoPresident and Chief Executive Officer
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 440 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on any legisla3 tive day from Monday, September 29, 2008, through Fri4 day, October 3, 2008, on a motion offered pursuant to 

5 this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 

6 designee, it stand adjourned until 11 a.m. on Saturday, 

7 January 3, 2009, or until the time of any reassembly 
2 

•HCON 440 EH 

1 pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, which2 ever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or 

3 adjourns on any day from Monday, September 29, 2008, 

4 through Wednesday, December 31, 2008, on a motion of5 fered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Major6 ity Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned 

7 until 11 a.m. on Saturday, January 3, 2009, or until the 

8 time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this con9 current resolution, whichever occurs first. 

10 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority 

11 Leader of the Senate, or their respective designees, acting 

12 jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the 

13 House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify 

14 the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, 

15 to reassemble at such place and time as they may des16 ignate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant 

17 it. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 29, 

2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 440 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the 

cess or adjournment of the Senate. House of Representatives and a conditional re-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial statements accompanying the filings of Form 10-KSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                Dec-31-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                                   Jan-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                     Dec-31-1998 
<CASH>                                               325,915 
<SECURITIES>                                               0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                      4,435,553 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         117,700 
<INVENTORY>                                        3,540,281 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   8,229,626 
<PP&E>                                               931,932 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       320,414 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     8,922,629 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              2,527,777 
<BONDS>                                                    0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0 
<PREFERRED>                                                0 
<COMMON>                                           5,229,740 
<OTHER-SE>                                       (1,261,325) 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       8,922,629 
<SALES>                                           13,217,083 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  13,217,083 
<CGS>                                              9,447,592 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     13,971,134 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      20,390 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    57,167 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (774,441)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           2,900 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (777,341)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0 
<CHANGES>                                                  0 
<NET-INCOME>                                        (777,341)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (.16)
                                               


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerald Frank PLUNK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-30363.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 24, 1998.

ORDER

Plunk’s Motion to Accept Late-Filed Petition, Motion for Order Effective Nunc Pro Tunc, and Motion to Accept Over-length Petition are GRANTED. Plunk’s Motion to Supplement the Record is DENIED.

The slip opinion filed August 28, 1998 [153 F.3d 1011], is amended as follows:

*11961. Slip op. at 9706, second full paragraph, fourth sentence [153 F.3d at 1022].

The sentence beginning “Plunk, however, did not object ____” is changed to read: “Plunk, however, did not object to the admission of Speziale’s identification testimony at trial.”

2. Slip op. at 9715, first full paragraph, fourth line [153 F.3d at 1026],

Replace the second half of the paragraph, from “Standing alone, however ....” to the end of page 9715, with: “Plunk, however, stipulated before trial to the use of transcripts that identified him as one of the speakers. He did not object to the use of his name until the jury asked during deliberations to listen to certain portions of the tapes and the court indicated that it would play the tapes for the jury in the courtroom and again provide them with transcripts. Only then did Plunk propose alternative transcripts that substituted neutral terms for the speakers’ names. The court reasonably rejected this request because a change in transcripts might mislead the jury. Instead, the court expressly advised the jury that the identification of speakers on the transcripts was not evidence of them identity. The court did not abuse its discretion in refusing Plunk’s request and permitting the jury to view the transcripts.

For the foregoing reasons, Plunk’s transcript-based challenge must fail.”

With these amendments, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing.

The suggestion for rehearing en banc will be dealt with in a separate order.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED.
583 A.2d 310

#### IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF GLORIA E. SOTO FOR A DECLARATORY RULING AS TO THE APPLICABILITY OF N.J.S.A. 5:12-138 TO CERTAIN POLITICAL ACTIVITIES. GLORIA E. SOTO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION.

January 23, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 236 *N.J.Super.*303, 565 A.2d 1088)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

______________________________

)

RON DIXON, as Conservator for )

Beatrice Jiggetts, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1789 (RWR) 

)

MIDLAND MORTGAGE CO., )

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

MEMORANDUM ORDER

The defendant removed this action from the Superior Court of

the District of Columbia on September 21, 2009 and on 

September 28, 2009 moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

12(b)(6) to dismiss the entire complaint, which raised claims of

breach of contract, trespass and conversion. On June 29, 2010,

the defendant’s motion was granted as to the plaintiff’s

conversion claim, but denied as to the plaintiff’s breach of

contract and trespass claims. On August 2, 2010, without seeking

leave to amend, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint

purporting to add a wrongful eviction claim. (Am. Compl. Docket

Entry #14.) Under Rule 15(a), a party may amend its pleading

once as a matter of course within 21 days after it is served, 21

days after service of the responsive pleading if the pleading is

one to which a responsive pleading is required, or 21 days after

service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f). Fed. R. Civ.
-2-

P. 15(a)(1). “In all other cases, a party may amend its pleading

only with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s

leave.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Because the plaintiff did not

file timely his amended complaint or seek leave to amend or

submit any written consent from the defendant, it is hereby 

ORDERED that plaintiff’s amended complaint [14] be, and

hereby is, STRICKEN. 

SIGNED this 27th day of August, 2010.

 /s/ 

RICHARD W. ROBERTS

United States District Judge
583 A.2d 295

#### IN THE MATTER OF EDWARD C. CHEW, III, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

December 24, 1990.

ORDER

EDWARD C. CHEW, III of YOORHEES, who was admitted to the Bar of this State in 1985, having been Ordered to Show Cause on December 20, 1990 why this Court’s Order of temporary suspension should not be continued pending the disposition of ethics proceedings against him, and he having consented to a continuation of his temporary suspension;

It is ORDERED that the suspension of EDWARD C. CHEW, III shall continue pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he shall continue to comply with Regulation 23 of the Administrative Guidelines Governing Suspended Attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics shall take such protective action pursuant to *Rule*1:20-11(c) as it deems appro*588priate, including the transfer to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund of the attorney account funds held in any financial institution by EDWARD C. CHEW, III, which funds were restrained from disbursement by this Court’s Order of November 26, 1990.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000773136
<NAME> RAMSAY HEALTH CARE, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,570,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,076,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,041,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,351,000
<PP&E>                                     101,219,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              34,776,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             148,363,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,784,000
<BONDS>                                     50,125,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        6,491,000
<PREFERRED>                                  3,271,000
<COMMON>                                       115,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  55,861,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               148,363,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,977,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,013,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,643,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,094,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,471,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                756,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            756,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   756,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Trans Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John S. Tumis, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/ John S. Tumis      
|John S. Tumis          
|Chief Financial Officer
|October 25, 2011       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 30, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 30, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18A2155. FORTSON, BENTLEY AND GRIFFIN, P.A. v. KELLY C. HOLLOWAY.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                 Exhibit 11 - Computation of Earnings Per Share


                                                     3 MONTHS ENDED                       9 MONTHS ENDED
                                                      SEPTEMBER 30,                        SEPTEMBER 30,
Primary:                                          1996            1995                 1996            1995
                                              ---------------------------          ---------------------------
<S>                                            <C>             <C>                  <C>             <C>      
Weighted average shares outstanding             4,505,309       4,344,250            4,452,991       4,341,299
Net effect of dilutive stock
   options - based on the
   treasury stock method using
   average market price                           204,697         265,735              230,131         140,906
                                              ---------------------------          ---------------------------
Totals                                          4,710,006       4,609,985            4,683,122       4,482,205

Net Income                                    $   518,747     $   370,971          $ 1,161,435     $   846,941
                                              ---------------------------          ---------------------------
Earnings Per Share                            $      0.11     $      0.08          $      0.25     $      0.19
                                              ===========================          ===========================


Fully Diluted:
Weighted average shares outstanding             4,505,309       4,344,250            4,452,991       4,341,299
Net effect of dilutive stock
   options - based on the
   treasury stock method using
   the higher of the average
   or the closing price                           204,697         305,090              230,131         174,426
                                              ---------------------------          ---------------------------
Totals                                          4,710,006       4,649,340            4,683,122       4,515,725

Net Income                                    $   518,747     $   370,971          $ 1,161,435     $   846,941
                                              ---------------------------          ---------------------------
Earnings Per Share                            $      0.11     $      0.08          $      0.25     $      0.19
                                              ===========================          ===========================


All shares outstanding have been restated to give effect to the 5-for-4 stock
splits declared during September 1995 and June 1996.
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11

                        SOY ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCTS, INC.
                         COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE

                                                                  PERIOD FROM
                                                                    DATE OF
                                                                   INCEPTION
                                                YEAR ENDED          THROUGH
                                               SEPTEMBER 30,     SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                    1997              1996
                                                    ----              ----

LOSS PER SHARE      

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING (1)          5,076,634         1,519,833
                                                 =========         =========

(1) LOSS  PER  SHARE IS  BASED  UPON  THE  WEIGHTED  AVERAGE  NUMBER  OF  SHARES
    OUTSTANDING FOR EACH OF THE RESPECTIVE  YEARS.  ALL WEIGHTED  AVERAGE SHARES
    OUTSTANDING  GIVE  RETROACTIVE  EFFECT TO THE 1 FOR 6 REVERSE STOCK SPLIT IN
    NOVEMBER, 1996

(2) FULLY  DILUTED  EARNINGS  PER  SHARE  HAVE  NOT BEEN  PRESENTED  AS THEY ARE
    ANTIDILUTIVE
News United States Air Force
 September issue of Airman magazine now availablePublished Sept. 7, 2016
                        
                        By Airman Magazine Staff
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                The September issue of Airman magazine is now available to download and is viewable through a web browser.
This month’s issue of Airman magazine highlights the ongoing Air Force priorities of creating and supporting global partnerships and remaining on the cutting edge of technological innovation. 
In our cover story, we examine how the Air Force is endeavoring to attract the nation’s top scientific minds to its research facilities. In the next feature, you’ll read how Mobility Support Advisory Squadron units build global partnerships through training and support missions.  Finally, we look back at 1990-1991, when the service’s long-standing tradition of coalition building, leadership and technological superiority combined to achieve a great victory in the Gulf War.
Airman magazine provides an interactive experience for tablet readers and a limited interactive version is viewable in web browser format. 
You can download June’s issue of Airman magazine on your tablet here:
- Apple version
- Android version
To read this issue on a PC/Mac, click here.
For more stories, visit Airman Online, the website for the official magazine of the U.S. Air Force.Airman magazine 



MSAS 



ROTC 



stem 



Air Force Research Laboratory 



Gulf War 



Mobility Support Advisory Squadron