alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                             <C>             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1999     JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                6,890          11,313
<SECURITIES>                                              0               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         2,030             174
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0               0
<INVENTORY>                                               0               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     10,225          11,854
<PP&E>                                                  589           1,478
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       39,282          13,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 5,995           3,248
<BONDS>                                                   0               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0               0
<PREFERRED>                                               0             629
<COMMON>                                                326             252
<OTHER-SE>                                          132,563          93,963
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         39,282          13,419
<SALES>                                               2,816           1,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0               0
<CGS>                                                   626             216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        19,092           6,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      (76)          1,423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           0               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0               0
<CHANGES>                                                 0               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (16,199)         (7,250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.53)           (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.53)           (.45)



</TABLE>
BRIGADIER GENERAL ROBERT S. ISRAEL JR.Robert Scott Israel Jr. was born in San Antonio, Texas in 1907. He graduated from the U.S. Military Academy in 1928 and was commissioned a second lieutenant. 

After graduating from the Air Force Flying School in 1929, General Israel served as commanding officer of the First Pursuit Group and Los Angeles Air Defense Wing in Calfornia. Then, as commanding officer of the Third Air Defense Wing at Mitchel Field, N.Y., he was transferred overseas to North Africa in February 1943. The next two years General Israel commanded the 62nd Fighter Wing in Sicily and Italy, where he participated in the battle campaigns of Tunisia, Sicily, the Po Valley, Naples-Foggia, Rome Arno, the North Appennines and Sicilian amphibious operations. 

Completing the Command and General Staff' School in 1946, the general was then assigned duty with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Washington, D.C. 

For a short period in 1951 General Israel served with the Fifth Air Force in Korea, participating in the Communist Chinese Spring Offensive. After that he was successively the vice commander of the 314th Air Division, commanding general of the 41st Air Division and vice commander of the Japan Air Defense Force within the Far East Air Forces, Japan. 

Joining the Air Defense Command on May 1, 1953, General Israel became commander of the 32nd Air Division (Defense) at Syracuse Air Force Station, Syracuse, N.Y., with additional duty on Jan. 15, 1957 as commander of the 32nd Continental Air Defense Division, also at Syracuse. 

His decorations include the Bronze Star, Legion of Merit with oak leaf cluster, Order of the Southern Cross from Brazil, British Royal Warrant of Appointment and the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation.  He is a command pilot. 

(Up to date as of January 1957)
MAJOR GENERAL LEIGH WADELeigh Wade was born in Cassopolis, Mich., in 1896, and graduated from high school there in 1915. 

He enlisted in the National Guard in June 1916, and a year later became an aviation cadet. In December 1917, after graduating from flying school, he was rated a pilot and commissioned a first lieutenant in the Aviation Section of the Officers' Reserve Corps, with which he served continuously until March 1926, when he reverted to inactive status. 

General Wade then became an aircraft sales executive with Consolidated Aircraft, with which he worked in the United States and South America until 1941 and for which he was chief test pilot from 1928 to 1929. In March 1941, General Wade returned to active duty with the Air Corps as a major and was assigned to the Air Intelligence Section at Air Corps headquarters. In June 1941, he was transferred to the First Bomber Command at Mitchel Field, N.Y., where he served as assistant for plans and training. 

General Wade went to Cuba in August 1942, to command Batista Field. In May 1946, he was assigned to the 14th Air Force at Orlando, Fla., as operations officer and public information officer. 

In November 1948, General Wade received temporary duty at Air Force Headquarters. In July 1949, he became air attache at Athens, Greece. He was appointed air attache at Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in May 1951, and in December 1952, became chief of the Air Section of the Joint Brazil-U.S. Military Commission also at Rio de Janeiro. 

General Wade was awarded the Distinguished Service Medal in 1925 for his services as pilot and supply officer of the U.S. Army Air Service around-the-world flight from April 6 to Sept. 28, 1924. He also has been awarded the Legion of Merit and many foreign awards. He is rated a command pilot. 

In 1925, General Wade received honorary master of science degrees from Tufts College and Norwich University.
#### Mary E. Hale v. L. P. Terrell et al.

(No. 5975.)

Appeal from Wise County.

Charles Sowajrd, counsel for appellant.

No counsel appeared for appellees.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 455. *Cause tried by judge; rules as to incompetent evidence in such case; case stated.*Appellees sued appellant to recover a piano, and sued out a writ of sequestration, which was executed by the seizure of the piano, and thereupon appellant replevied said piano. The cause was tried by the judge and judgment rendered in favor of appellees against appellant for the specific property, the piano, and also against appellant and the sureties on her replevy bond for $272,50, the value of said piano, and for all costs. Most of appellant’s bills of exception relate to rulings of the court upon the admissibility of evidence. *Held:*“In trials of fact, without the aid of a jury, the question of the admissibility of evidence can seldom be raised, since, whatever may be the ground of the objection, the evidence objected to must of necessity be heard or read by the judge in order to determine its character and value. In such cases the only question, in effect, is the sufficiency and weight of the evidence.” [1 Greenl. Ev. § 49.] On appeal, in such case, a judgment will not be reversed because incompetent testimony has been admitted, if there be sufficient legal testimony to support it; and the determination of facts by the judge is entitled to the same consideration as the verdict of a jury; and such determination will not be interfered with when the evidence is conflicting, as it is in this case, there being; sufficient evidence to warrant the findings of the judge. [Bailey v. White, 13 Tex. 114; Galliard v. Chessney, i... 337; Beaty v. Whitaker, 23 Tex. 526; 1 App. C. C. §§ 718, 967,-1015, 1155, 1188, 1195, 1219.]

*555April 13, 1889.

§ 456. *Judgment in sequestration suit where defendant has replevied property and plaintiff recovers.*When property seized under sequestration has been replevied by the defendant, the replevy bond is required to be returned with the writ to the court from whence such writ issued; and, in case the suit is decided against the defendant, judgment shall be entered against all the obligors on said bond jointly and severally for the value of the property. [R. S. art. 4501.] Such judgment maybe discharged by the defendant by a return of the specific property within ten days after the rendition of the judgment, such return to be made to the sheriff or constable of the court in which the judgment was rendered. [R. S. art. 4502.] In this case the judgment rendered by the trial court is not in accordance with the statute, and it is here reformed so as to give appellees a judgment against appellant and the sureties upon her replevy bond for 8272.50, together with interest and all cost's, allowing appellant ten days after the mandate of this court herein shall have been filed in the trial court within which to return the specific property, which, if returned within said time, shall be credited to the amount of the value thereof upon said judgment.

Reformed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 22, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50199

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALFONSO RIVERA-GODINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-1254-1

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alfonso RiveraGodinez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
583 A.2d 309

#### STOCHASTIC DECISIONS, INC. v. JAMES DIDOMENICO.

January 23, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 236 *N.J.Super.*388, 565 A.2d 1133)
583 A.2d 313

#### WALTER L. ERHARDT, JR. v. VINCENT J. LIPARI.

January 23, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Curtis Smith, Chief Financial Officer of Keynote Systems, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

·                  the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 30, 2012 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

·                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.

 

Date: January 30, 2012

 
| /s/ CURTIS H. SMITH                                                           |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| **Curtis H. Smith   Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Financial Officer)** |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Keynote Systems, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,982,179
<SECURITIES>                                 1,328,466
<RECEIVABLES>                                  543,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,531,335
<PP&E>                                       3,333,035
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,135,207
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,729,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,289,106
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,206
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,331,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,729,163
<SALES>                                      6,489,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,489,957
<CGS>                                        4,606,289
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,606,289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,153,204
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                751,373
<INCOME-TAX>                                   312,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            439,373
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   439,373
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6073

RAYMOND RONALD JENNI N GS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. L. Patrick Auld , Magistrate Judge. ( 1:23

- cv - 00016

- CCE

- LPA )

Submitted : September 26, 2023 Decided: October 3, 2023

Before THACKER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Raymond Ronald Jennings, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6073 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/03/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Raymond Ronald Jennings seeks to appeal t he magistrate judge’s order and
recommendation that the district court dismiss Jennings’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition without prejudice. Thi s court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral o rders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The magistrate judge’s order and recommendation is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6073 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/03/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1126 

To reauthorize the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and Technology 

Competitiveness Act of 1988. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. LIPINSKI (for himself and Mr. EHLERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Science and Technology 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation 

and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS. 

4 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

5 9 of the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and 

6 Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988 (15 U.S.C. 

7 5108) is amended to read as follows: 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1126 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 9. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sec3 retary to carry out this Act $12,000,000 for each of the 

4 fiscal years 2008 through 2012.’’. 

5 (b) STEEL PROJECT PRIORITIES.—Section 4(c)(1) of 

6 the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and Tech7 nology Competitiveness Act of 1988 (15 U.S.C. 

8 5103(c)(1)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (H), by striking ‘‘coatings 

10 for sheet steels’’ and inserting ‘‘sheet and bar 

11 steels’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub13 paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(K) The development of technologies 

15 which reduce greenhouse gas emissions.’’. 

16 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The Steel and 

17 Aluminum Energy Conservation and Technology Competi18 tiveness Act of 1988 is further amended— 

19 (1) by striking section 7 (15 U.S.C. 5106); and 

20 (2) in section 8 (15 U.S.C. 5107), by inserting 

21 ‘‘, beginning with fiscal year 2008,’’ after ‘‘close of 

22 each fiscal year’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5628]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              SUPPORT THE AMERICAN OVERSEAS INTERESTS ACT

  (Mr. HEFLEY asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Mr. HEFLEY. Mr. Speaker, when the House resumes debate today on H.R. 
1561, the American Overseas Interests Act, our colleagues on the other 
side of the aisle will remind us that President Clinton doesn't like 
this bill and has said he will veto it.
  Of course Bill Clinton doesn't like this bill. It kills three Federal 
agencies and cuts spending by $3 billion in the next 2 years. It is not 
his style to support such cuts.
  But it also focuses on vital American interests by supporting peace 
and stability in the Middle East. This bill is about getting nuclear 
weapons out of Russia and the other former Soviet States--and locking 
in the gains of the cold war by supporting nations that want to join 
NATO.
  It recognizes our enemies by cutting off aid to countries that supply 
weapons to terrorist states--that give aid to Cuba--or that 
consistently vote against us in the United Nations.
  So what if Bill Clinton is threatening to veto the American Overseas 
Interests Act? We should still support it. I urge my colleagues to join 
me in voting yes on final passage.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5485]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 PRAYER

  The Chaplain, Rev. James David Ford, D.D., offered the following 
prayer:
  We pray, gracious God, that we will not be content simply to follow 
old paths and repeat meaningless patterns, but that our hearts and 
minds would be open to new adventures and new opportunities of service. 
May Your good Spirit breathe into our souls a freshness that cleanses 
our ideas, our hopes, and our dreams and may we truly look to Your 
guidance for the days ahead. Teach us to grow in Your grace and trust 
in Your goodness, this day and every day. Amen.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 76 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4598]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Graham] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. GRAHAM addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5174]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from New Jersey [Mr. Martini] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. MARTINI addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1099]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                 IN MEMORY OF RICHARD SITER, U.S. NAVY

                                 ______

                       HON. GERALD B. H. SOLOMON

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                         Tuesday, May 23, 1995
  Mr. SOLOMON. Mr. Speaker, as Memorial Day approaches again this year, 
many people and families around this Nation prepare weekend trips, 
picnics and barbecues. They can do so because of the selfless service 
and sacrifice of the millions of men and women who have served in the 
armed forces throughout our history. These people defend and provide 
the very freedoms we enjoy everyday, not to mention those luxurious 
moments we look forward to spending with loved ones on days like 
Memorial Day.
  However, for a great deal of Americans, Memorial Day takes on a much 
more personal meaning, a reminder of the loss of a loved one. It is a 
time when millions of Americans reflect on the memory of a loved one 
who made the ultimate sacrifice on behalf of our nation and our 
freedoms. Mr. Speaker, I would like to take this time to pay tribute to 
the service of one such American hero from the town of Philmont, NY in 
my congressional district, Lt. Richard Siter, U.S. Navy.
  In the summer of 1992, Lieutenant Siter was stationed aboard the air 
craft carrier, USS John F. Kennedy off the coast of Puerto Rico. 
Richard was a radar specialist in the Navy's air division and was 
assigned to an E-C2 Hawkeye aircraft. On July 31, 1992, Lieutenant 
Siter and the four other members of the five man crew, were flying over 
the waters of the Atlantic, well north of Puerto Rico, comprising the 
defense of our eastern shore. Upon their return flight to the USS John 
F. Kennedy, the five members of this Hawkeye crew would suffer a 
terrible accident. Their craft went down 75 miles north of Puerto Rico 
with no survivors. Tragically, the body of Lieutenant Siter and his 
fellow crewmen were never found.
  Mr. Speaker, these are the people we should hold near and dear to our 
hearts as this Memorial Day draws near. As we celebrate the golden 
anniversary of the end of World War II and remember the thousands who 
gave their lives in that monumental war, let us not forget those, like 
Richard Siter, who put their lives on the line daily to provide the 
blanket of freedom beneath which our Nation and our way of life has 
thrived.
  At this time, Mr. Speaker, I would ask that you, and all Members, 
join me in paying tribute to the service of Lt. Richard Siter and send 
our condolences to his family. While they suffered through the initial 
uncertainty of his whereabouts, they can be bolstered by the certainty 
that Richard is indeed counted amongst great Americans. May he be both 
in our hearts and our minds this Memorial Day and always.

                          ____________________
```