alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 VCSAF, spouse take in Ramstein mission setsPublished April 19, 2016
                        
                        By 1st Lt. Clay Lancaster
                        
                        
                        86th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force's vice chief of staff and his spouse visited Ramstein Air Base on April 18 to meet with Airmen and familiarize themselves with the mission sets of Ramstein’s three different wings.The base is one of several installations Gen. David L. Goldfein and his wife, Dawn, plan to visit throughout U.S. Air Forces in Europe. The couple had the opportunity to hear from Airmen in the 86th Airlift Wing and also those in the 521st Air Mobility Operations Wing and 435th Air Ground Operations Wing."The Airmen here at Ramstein, and the missions they're all performing, are truly phenomenal and it shows in the few examples I've experienced while visiting," Goldfein said. "Although I'm familiar with the area having graduated from high school here, I'm less familiar with recent accomplishments and it's been great hearing about the amazing work of the Airmen here in USAFE."During his visit, Goldfein toured the Deployment Transition Center, received a briefing on the base’s support roles in the ordered departure of dependents from Turkey, and saw innovations that the installation has made in the past year.Dawn was introduced to several of the base’s key spouses, many of whom were instrumental in the success of the reception efforts when families from Turkey started arriving. She was interested in finding out how those families, especially children, were adjusting to their new home."It truly speaks to the resilience of military spouses," said Carri May Waite, a 435th Construction Training Squadron key spouse. "The children bounce back because the parents are setting such a great example."She continued to tell Dawn about all the other activities and events made available to the children through youth sports and other force support initiatives."It is a testament to just how much our military spouses and families serve, as well," Dawn said.She also heard firsthand accounts from three displaced spouses whose children are completing the school year at Ramstein AB, and visited the Vogelweh Child Development Center, Vogelweh School Age Program and Vogelweh Elementary School library."The efforts made by the installation during the families' departure from Turkey are just one example of how the Airmen in USAFE are caring for people and leading the Air Force and its mission," the general said.visit 



Ramstein AB 



Germany 



military spouse 



VCSAF
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1070 

To allow postal patrons to contribute to funding for gang prevention programs 

through the voluntary purchase of certain specially issued postage stamps. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2007 

Mr. BACA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee 

on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To allow postal patrons to contribute to funding for gang 

prevention programs through the voluntary purchase of 

certain specially issued postage stamps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stamp Out Gang Vio5 lence Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SPECIAL POSTAGE STAMP. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—In order to afford a convenient 

8 way for members of the public to contribute to funding 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1070 IH

1 for gang prevention programs, the United States Postal 

2 Service shall provide for a special postage stamp in accord3 ance with subsection (b). 

4 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The issuance and sale 

5 of the stamp referred to in subsection (a) shall be gov6 erned by section 416 of title 39, United States Code, and 

7 regulations under such section, subject to the following: 

8 (1) DISPOSITION OF PROCEEDS.—All amounts 

9 becoming available from the sale of such stamp shall 

10 be transferred to the Gang Resistance Education 

11 and Training (G.R.E.A.T.) Program, administered 

12 by the Office of Justice Programs of the Depart13 ment of Justice, through payments which shall be 

14 made at least twice a year. 

15 (2) DURATION.—Such stamp shall be made 

16 available to the public for a period of at least 2 

17 years, beginning no later than 12 months after the 

18 date of the enactment of this Act. 

19 (3) LIMITATION.—Such stamp shall not be 

20 counted for purposes of applying any numerical limi21 tation under subsection (e)(1)(C) of such section. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 Retired CMSAF Gaylor engages with AirmenPublished July 20, 2015
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Ian Dudley
                        
                        
                        30th Space Wing Public Affairs
                **VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFNS) --**
                Retired Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Robert Gaylor visited and connected with Vandenberg Air Force Base members from around base July 16. Gaylor spent most of his time engaging with Airmen and emphasizing the individual impact each person can have on the Air Force as a whole."My goal is to promote and support the feeling of ownership of the Air Force and the individual's contribution to the mission," Gaylor said. "I think it is very easy for a person to be assigned to a particular function, go there every day, complete that function very effectively and not feel like they are part of the whole." Gaylor retired as the fifth chief master sergeant of the Air Force in 1979, but continues to be connected to the Air Force and share his career experiences with Airmen."I still refer to the Air Force as 'my Air Force' and I am not being selfish,” Gaylor said. “I really feel that I am a part owner of what we know as the Air Force. I started out as a cop and I didn't have that feeling. I was at a base and I guarded things that never moved. I didn't always feel like I was doing something important, but once I realized it was important it made my career easy." For some of the base leadership it provided an opportunity to see into the mind of an individual, who despite being retired for 36 years, still provides inspiration to the current generation of Airmen."Two things amazed me about the chief, first off is his ability to connect with an individual instantly," said Chief Master Sgt. Robert Bedell, the 30th Space Wing command chief. "The other thing is his ability to stay current with what is going on in the world. If this gentleman at 85 years old can stay so connected to his Air Force, as he puts it, then why can't I do the same (for) my Air Force?"Gaylor took the time to connect on an individual basis with Airmen, listening intently and responding with advice gleaned from years of experience."Success in life narrows down to about three words," Gaylor said. "Word one, contribution; are you making a contribution? The second word is impact; is my contribution helping make an impact? And third is visibility; is what I do visible? Do others see and know what I do?"AFSPC 



CMSAF 



Robert Gaylor 



Gaylor 



Vandenberg AFB
```

  EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C5,
  Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
  Series 2011-C5 (the "Trust")

  I, Anthony Sfarra, a President of Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage
  Securities, Inc., the depositor into the above-referenced Trust, certify
  that:

  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports Form
    10-D required to be filed in respect of periods included in the year
    covered by this annual report, of the Trust;

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic report, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement
    in all material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee, Midland Loan Services,
    Inc. as Special Servicer and TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. as
    Trust Advisor.

    Dated:   August 8, 2012

    /s/ Anthony Sfarra
    Signature

    President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
```
September 20, 1979.

422 A.2d 1169

#### Commonwealth v. Eaton, Appellant.

Submitted March 12, 1979.

Daniel R. Kehm, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Sheryl Ann Dorney, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before VAN der VOORT, WATKINS and LIPEZ, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Clyde Williams v. Jirech Property Management, LP; ChiChung Chang

Appellate case number: 01-17-00674-CV

Trial court case number: 17-DCV-059964

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 3 of Fort Bend County

The Clerk of this Court’s September 18, 2017 notice directed the county clerk to 

file an indigent clerk’s record regarding the pro se appellant Clyde Williams’s “Sworn 

Statement of Inability to Pay Costs for Appeal” (“Statement”). On October 6, 2017, the 

county clerk filed an indigent clerk’s record containing a plaintiff’s contest to affidavit of 

inability, filed on August 23, 2017, but no trial court’s order denying the indigence claim.

Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1 provides that a party who files such a Statement

in the trial court “is not required to pay costs in the appellate court unless the trial court

overruled the party’s claim of indigence in an order that complies with Texas Rule of 

Civil Procedure 145.” TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(b)(1). Because appellant’s claim of 

indigence was not overruled by the trial court, appellant is not required to pay costs in 

this appeal. See id.

Although the court reporter’s September 6, 2017 info sheet stated that there was 

no reporter’s record taken, the filing fee and the clerk’s record fee have not been paid. 

Thus, the Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to deem the appellant indigent and allowed 

to proceed without advance payment for purposes of the filing and clerk’s record fees.

Accordingly, because appellant is pro se, the Court ORDERS the county clerk to

mail a copy of the clerk’s and indigent clerk’s records to appellant, at no cost to

appellant, within 20 days of the date of this Order, and shall further certify to this 

Court the date when delivery is made within 30 days of the date of this Order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 

Date: October 17, 2017
News United States Air Force
 AF recognizes a lifetime of servicePublished May 26, 2015
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Torri Ingalsbe
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs Command Information
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Assistant Vice Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Stephen L. Hoog presented the Air Force Exceptional Service Award to retired Col. Arnald D. Gabriel during an Air Force Symphony performance at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, May 24.
“We are going to give him what we call the Air Force Exceptional Service Award,” Hoog said. “This is only given to those people who demonstrate exceptional patriotism and service in a civilian capacity.”
Gabriel began his career in 1943 as an Army machine gunner. He later separated from the Army and pursued higher education degrees in music education. Gabriel reentered active-duty military service as an Air Force band conductor. After retiring from the Air Force in 1985, he continued his passion for music and mentoring at George Mason University for 10 years. In 1990, Gabriel began serving as the Conductor Emeritus for the Air Force Band and conducted more than 2,000 concerts with global audiences in 22 years.
“What an absolutely incredible day, in an incredible venue, with incredible music,” Hoog said.  “I couldn’t help but feel the chills in some of the earlier performances.”  
Hoog said he was also in awe as he watched Gabriel conduct a song dedicated to the men he fought side-by-side with on D-Day.
The award came as a surprise to Gabriel.
“To say I’m surprised is an understatement; shocked is better,” Gabriel said.  “I am truly honored.
“I never thought I’d live to be 90, but then there were days I didn’t think I would live 10 minutes longer,” Gabriel said.
Even after 72 years of service, Gabriel continues to serve and support service members from all branches of the military, and shares his love of music with everyone he meets.Memorial Day 



U.S. Air Force Band
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         49,171
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  35,939
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               67,109
<PP&E>                                      2,295,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                121,987
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,386,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          66,973
<BONDS>                                       736,503
<COMMON>                                          554
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                        80
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,414,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                2,386,421
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              166,053
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  99,067
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                6,679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             22,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                54,380
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            54,380
<DISCONTINUED>                                (1,473)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (2,335)
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   50,572
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.97
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-3606

___________

Jeffrey White; Imogene White; Ray *

White, *

Plaintiffs - *

Appellants, *

 v. *

Lyle Minnick, individually and in *

his capacity as the Sheriff of *

Ringgold County, Iowa; Arlen *

Hughes, individually and in his *

capacity as the County Attorney * Appeal from the United States

of Ringgold County, Iowa; Highway * District Court for the

Patrol, State of Missouri; * Southern District of Iowa.

Ringgold County, Iowa; *

Unknown/Unnamed Defendants, sued *

as “John Doe”, an unknown * [UNPUBLISHED]

Missouri Highway Patrol Officer; *

Lawrence Waldauer, individually *

and in his capacity as Worth *

County, Missouri Sheriff; Worth *

County Missouri Sheriff’s

Department; Lorace Waldeier,

Defendants -

Appellees.

*

*

*

___________

Submitted: September 11, 1997

Filed: December 12, 1997

___________
The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern 1

District of Iowa.

-2-

Before HANSEN, ROSS, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey, Imogene, and Ray White brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

against the above-named defendants. In addition to federal civil rights

violations, the Whites alleged various violations of state law. The

district court dismissed the action against the Missouri defendants and

1

later granted summary judgment for the remaining defendants. The Whites

contest both the dismissal and the grant of summary judgment.

Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the trial court

committed no error, and we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47(B).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





--------------------------------------------------------------------








In
      connection with the Annual Report of IBSG International, Inc (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Geoffrey
      Birch  Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2001, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




IBSG
                International, IncDecember
                  5, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Geoffrey
                BirchGeoffrey
              BirchChief
                Accounting Officer
#### Llewellyn, Appellee, *v.*The Cincinnati Street Ry. Co., Appellant.

(Decided May 27, 1940.)

*Mr. John C. McCarthy,*for appellee.

*Mr. John M. McCaslin,*for appellant.

By the Court.

The principal error complained of is that the court refused to permit comment on the failure to produce an available witness.

The law undoubtedly is that if it appears from the evidence that a litigant knows of the existence' of a witness and such witness is within the control of the litigant whose interest it would naturally be to produce him, and without satisfactory explanation he fails to do so, the jury may draw an inference that the testimony of the witness would not have been favorable to him. *Stocker*v. *Boston & Maine Rd.,*84 N. H., 377, 151 A., 457, 70 A. L. R., 1320; 10 Ruling Case Law, 884, Section 32; 20 American Jurisprudence, 192, Section 187; 17 Ohio Jurisprudence, 105, Section 84. And, of course, if the jury would be justified in drawing the inference, counsel would be within the lim*108its of legitimate argument in urging the jury to draw it.

But, for the rule to apply, it must appear that the witness was under the control of the litigant failing to produce him. That element is lacking in this case. All that appears is that an unnamed' and unknown woman assisted the plaintiff to the sidewalk immediately after she fell or was thrown from the streetcar. There is no evidence that the plaintiff knew her name, her residence, or anything else about her, or had the means of ascertaining any such information. Under such circumstances, no inference can be drawn that the production or non-production of this witness' was within the control of the plaintiff. No inference, therefore, could be drawn that her testimony would not have been favorable to the plaintiff.

We find no error in this record.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Hamilton, P. J., Matthews' and Ross, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-37385, 333-24941, 333-66445, 333-69241, 333-77725, 333-
77723, 333-87301 and 333-92257) pertaining to the 1995 Flexible Stock
Incentive Plan, the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, the 1997 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, the WebLogic, Inc. 1996 Stock Plan and The Theory Center, Inc.
Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan and the
Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-58439, 333-63117, 333-66443, 333-
34956, 333-92085 and 333-32348) of BEA Systems, Inc. of our report dated
February 21, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of BEA Systems, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended January 31, 2000.

                                                   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Palo Alto, California
April 28, 2000