alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7496-S7497]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

  The following reports of committees were submitted:

       By Mr. MURKOWSKI, from the Committee on Energy and Natural 
     Resources, with an amendment in the nature of a substitute:
     [[Page S7497]]
     
       S. 333. A bill to direct the Secretary of Energy to 
     institute certain procedures in the performance of risk 
     assessments in connection with environmental restoration 
     activities, and for other purposes (Rept. No. 104-87).
       By Mr. ROTH, from the Committee on Governmental Affairs, 
     with an amendment in the nature of a substitute:
       S. 291. A bill to reform the regulatory process, to make 
     government more efficient and effective, and for other 
     purposes (Rept. No. 104-88).
     

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 91 (Tuesday, June 6, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5611]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

  The SPEAKER. Will the gentleman from Alabama [Mr. Everett] come 
forward and lead the House in the Pledge of Allegiance.
  Mr. EVERETT led the Pledge of Allegiance as follows:

       I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of 
     America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation 
     under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

                          ____________________
```
IIA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 72 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Received 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 

2008, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Public Law 110–92 is further amended by striking 

4 the date specified in section 106(3) and inserting ‘‘Decem5 ber 31, 2007’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HJ 72 RDS 

1 SEC. 2. Public Law 110–92 is further amended by 

2 adding at the end the following new sections: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 160. Notwithstanding any other provision of 

4 this joint resolution, there is appropriated for payment to 

5 the heirs at law of Julia Carson, late a Representative 

6 from the State of Indiana, $165,200. 

7 ‘‘SEC. 161. Notwithstanding section 106, the author8 ity to provide care and services under section 

9 1710(e)(1)(E) of title 38, United States Code, shall con10 tinue in effect through September 30, 2008. 

11 ‘‘SEC. 162. Notwithstanding section 106, the author12 ity provided by section 2306(d)(3) of title 38, United 

13 States Code, shall continue in effect through September 

14 30, 2008.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 19, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

          - 7 CFR Part 457
          - RIN 0563-AC21

# AGENCY:

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains a correction to the final regulation which was published July 29, 2010 (75 FR 44709-44718). The regulation, as here                               ( print page 59058)                            pertinent, related to the insurance of stonefruit.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 27, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Claire White, Economist, Product Management, Product Administration and Standards Division, Risk Management Agency, United States Department of Agriculture, Beacon Facility, Stop 0812, Room 421, PO Box 419205, Kansas City, MO 64141-6205, telephone (816) 926-7730.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background

The final regulation that is the subject of this correction revised the Stonefruit Crop Insurance Regulations that published July 29, 2010 (75 FR 44709-44718).

## Need for Correction

                    As published, the final regulation contained an error which may prove to be misleading. The amendatory instruction published on page 44717 of the                     **Federal Register**                     contained language specific to redesignating section 3(c) as 3(d) and revising redesignated section 3(c) in the Stonefruit Crop Insurance Provisions. However, redesignated section 3(d) was not revised. Therefore, reference to revising redesignated section 3(d) on page 44717 is not needed.                

In FR Doc. 10-18359 appearing on page 44717 in the issue published Thursday, July 29, 2010, the following correction is made:

§ 457.157 

1. On page 44717, in the first and second columns, remove amendatory instruction 3.l and redesignate amendatory instructions 3.m through 3.x as 3.l through 3.w.

Signed in Washington, DC, on September 16, 2010.

Barbara Leach,

Acting Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.

[FR Doc. 2010-23886 Filed 9-24-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-08-P
583 A.2d 331

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ETC. v. CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC., ETC. AND ON THE SPOT AUTO AND TRUCK REPAIR, INC., ETC.

February 27, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 F-35 flies first training sortie at Luke AFBPublished May 13, 2014
                **LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. (AFNS) --**
                An F-35 Lightning II took to the sky over the West Valley here, May 5, in what was the first local training sortie for the fifth-generation fighter jet. 
The jet is currently the only F-35 at Luke Air Force Base  with additional jets expected to arrive within the next few weeks.
"The ability to conduct local flight operations demonstrates the commitment by thousands of individuals who have worked to make this a reality," said Lt. Col. Michael Ebner, the 61st Fighter Squadron commander. "Our first sortie this week represents a significant milestone in the F-35 program at Luke (AFB)."
There are currently six F-35 pilots assigned to the 61st FS. There will eventually be approximately 30 pilots by the time the squadron is up to full capacity.
The 61st FS coordinates with the 61st Aircraft Maintenance Unit, which maintains the aircraft, to fly the jet when it is available -- which, as of this week, is approximately 1-2 times per day. That number could increase to 2-4 sorties a day by next month, when more jets are expected at Luke AFB, Ebner said.
Construction, much of which is sub-contracted locally, continues on base to prepare for the arrival of additional F-35s.
The Academic Training Center, which will house classrooms and 12 F-35 simulators, is under construction and is expected to be completed in late September. Construction is also underway on the combined Operations/AMU building for the second F-35 squadron.
Other projects, including the third Operations/AMU building, a maintainer training facility and a four-bay F-35 hangar are also in planning stages.*(Information courtesy of the 56th Fighter Wing Public Affairs)*F-35 Lightning II 



training 



Lightning II 



Luke Air Force Base Related Links
        F-35A Lightning II
                                April 11, 2014
                                The F-35A is the U.S. Air Force’s latest fifth-generation fighter. The F-35A will provide next-generation stealth, enhanced situational awareness, and reduced vulnerability for the United States and allied nations.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 5763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2317]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-905]

Notice of Correction to the First Administrative Review of 
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Correction to assessment rate section and separate rate company 
name.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 11, 2010, the Department of Commerce 
(``Department'') published the final results of the administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on certain polyester staple fiber 
from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). See First Administrative 
Review of Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the People's Republic of 
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 
1336 (January 11, 2010) (``Final Results'').

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emeka Chukwudebe, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0219.
    In response to comments received from respondents,\1\ the 
Department hereby clarifies two areas of the Final Results. The 
Department inadvertently stated in the assessment rate section that we 
will instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all companies at the company 
specific rate required at the time of entry. The Department hereby 
clarifies that we will instruct CBP to liquidate entries at the 
company-specific rate set forth in the Final Results. Additionally, in 
the Final Results, the Department omitted the full name of the separate 
rate company, Far Eastern Industries, Ltd., (Shanghai) and Far Eastern 
Polychem Industries and only listed Far Eastern Polychem Industries. 
The Department hereby corrects the Final Notice to state Far Eastern 
Industries, Ltd., (Shanghai) and Far Eastern Polychem Industries. The 
Final Results remains in effect in all other respects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Ningbo Dafa Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd., and Cixi Santai 
Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd.

    Dated: January 28, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-2317 Filed 2-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
```
#### Mayfield & Campbell v. W. K. Schrier.

(No. 33, Op. Book No. 1, p. 416.)

Appeal from Karnes County.

June 29, 1877.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 47. Where a judgment of a justice is attacked because of no service had on defendant before its-rendition, the presumption is in favor of the correctness of the judgment, and the burden of proof is on the party asserting it to show that there had been no service.

Reversed and remanded.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 87 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas 40,000 people in the United States, and 1,200,000 

people globally, die in road crashes each year; 

Whereas another 20,000,000 to 50,000,000 people globally 

are injured each year as a result of speeding motor vehicles, the increasing use of motor vehicles, and rapid urbanization; 
2 

•HCON 87 EH 

Whereas the World Health Organization has predicted that 

by the year 2020 the annual number of deaths from 

motor vehicle crashes is likely to surpass the annual 

number of deaths from AIDS; 

Whereas the current estimated cost of motor vehicle crashes 

worldwide is $518,000,000,000 annually, representing between 3 and 5 percent of the gross domestic product of 

each nation; 

Whereas over 90 percent of motorist-related deaths occur in 

low- and middle-income countries; 

Whereas according to the World Health Organization motorist-related deaths and costs continue to rise in these 

countries due to a lack of appropriate road engineering 

and injury prevention programs in public health sectors; 

and 

Whereas the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution designating the third Sunday of November as a 

day of remembrance for road crash victims and their 

families, and called on nations globally to improve road 

safety: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) supports the goals and ideals of a world day 

4 of remembrance for road crash victims; and 

5 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

6 to support and participate in programs and activities 

7 to commemorate a world day of remembrance for 
3 

•HCON 87 EH 

1 road crash victims with appropriate ceremonies, pro2 grams, and other activities. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 87 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of a world day of 

remembrance for road crash victims.
---

Exhibit 13.2

Certifications of the CEO AND CFOPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Merus Labs
International Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended September 30,
2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), Andrew Patient hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of
his or her knowledge, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                  
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Company.

Date: December 30, 2013

|By: | /s/ ANDREW PATIENT                       
|--- | -----------------------------------------
|    | Name:    Andrew Patient                  
|    | Title:      Chief
      Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to s. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
ss. 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**


**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Philip
      Holmes, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Kings Road Entertainment,
      Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




Date:
      August 28, 2008





/s/
                Philip HolmesPhilip
                HolmesPresident
                and Principal Executive Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THEODORE JACKSON.

March 13, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
accompanying financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996             JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                      14,296,000              14,296,000
<SECURITIES>                                31,540,000              31,540,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,135,000               6,135,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    437,000                 437,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            53,742,000              53,742,000
<PP&E>                                       2,494,000               2,494,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 703,000                 703,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,162,000              56,162,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,676,000               3,676,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        12,000                  12,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,474,000              52,474,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,162,000              56,162,000
<SALES>                                      6,371,000              11,874,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,371,000              11,874,000
<CGS>                                        1,117,000               2,220,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,117,000               2,220,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,404,000               8,369,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,429,000               2,478,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   427,000                 752,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,002,000               1,726,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,002,000               1,726,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08                     .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08                     .13
        

</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 109 

To amend the Small Business Act to make service-disabled veterans eligible 

under the 8(a) business development program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to make service-disabled 

veterans eligible under the 8(a) business development 

program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disabled Veteran 

5 Small Business Eligibility Expansion Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF SERVICE-DISABLED VETERANS 

7 UNDER 8(a) PROGRAM. 

8 Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

9 637(a)) is amended— 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 109 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(C) by inserting after 

2 ‘‘small business concern owned and controlled by so3 cially and economically disadvantaged individuals’’ 

4 the following: ‘‘, or a small business concern owned 

5 and controlled by service-disabled veterans,’’; and 

6 (2) in paragraph (4)— 

7 (A) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as 

8 subparagraph (D); and 

9 (B) by inserting after subparagraph (B) 

10 the following new subparagraph: 

11 ‘‘(C) For purposes of this section— 

12 ‘‘(i) the term ‘socially and economi13 cally disadvantaged small business concern’ 

14 includes a small business concern owned 

15 and controlled by service-disabled veterans; 

16 and 

17 ‘‘(ii) the term ‘disadvantaged owner’ 

18 includes an owner who is a service-disabled 

19 veteran, in the case of a small business 

20 concern owned and controlled by service21 disabled veterans.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H5631-H5632]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  ACTIVITIES OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT RELATING TO PREVENTION OF NUCLEAR 
     PROLIFERATION--MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

  The SPEAKER pro tempore laid before the House the following message 
from the President of the United States; which was read and, together 
with the accompanying papers, without objection, referred to the 
Committee on International Relations.

To the Congress of the United States:
  As required under section 601(a) of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act 
of 1978 (Public Law 95-242; 22 U.S.C. 3281(a)), I am transmitting a 
report on [[Page H5632]] the activities of United States Government 
departments and agencies relating to the prevention of nuclear 
proliferation. It covers activities between January 1, 1994, and 
December 31, 1994.
                                                  William J. Clinton.  
  The White House, June 6, 1995.
  

                          ____________________
```
#### Campbell & Jones v. State Central Bank.

(No. 2661, Op. Book No. 4.)

Error from McLennan County.

June 2, 1883.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 378. *Usury; judgment for illegal interest; judgTnent by default.*A judgment by default was rendered upon a promissory note, which, upon its face, stipulated for the payment of interest at the rate of two per cent, per month. This, illegal rate of interest is allowed and included in the judgment, and'the judgment furthermore recites that it shall bear interest at this rate from the date of its rendition. A case in point is Moseley v. Smith, wherein it is said: “The defendant, by his default, submits the contract, and his rights under it, to the court, and the contract, being plainly void on its face, in part, must be so declared and judged by the court.” [21 Tex. 441.]

This case is distinguished from Harrison v. State Central Bank, *supra,*in this, that in Harrison’s case he appeared and pleaded other defenses, thereby waiving the defense of usury. Here the defendant has not either expressly or impliedly waived the defense of usury, not having pleaded at all, the judgment being by default.

Reversed and remanded.