57086 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 180 / Friday, September 17, 2010 / Notices 

leadership, the NRC staff recommended 

moving the trait ‘‘Leadership Safety 

Values and Actions’’ to the top of the 

traits list to give it visual prominence. 

• Several comments indicated that 

there should be a discussion of 

complacency in the SOP. Complacency 

can occur because of long term success 

and repetition. Although this is already 

indirectly addressed in the traits (e.g., 

Effective Safety Communication and 

Personal Accountability are traits that 

prevent complacency), the NRC staff 

recommended further discussion of 

complacency in the revised draft SOP. 

The NRC is asking for comments as to 

whether it is useful to add a discussion 

on this aspect of safety culture to the 

SOP. 

VI. Questions for Which NRC Is 

Seeking Input 

(1) The revised definition of Nuclear 

Safety Culture is: ‘‘Nuclear Safety 

Culture is the core values and behaviors 

resulting from a collective commitment 

by leaders and individuals to emphasize 

safety over competing goals to ensure 

protection of people and the 

environment.’’ Should this be retained, 

as currently written, or should it be 

revised? 

(2) Does including the safety culture 

traits in the SOP itself clarify your 

understanding of what the Commission 

means by a positive safety culture? If 

not, what additional guidance do you 

think is needed? 

(3) Does the revised draft SOP provide 

a clear statement of the NRC’s 

expectations that the regulated 

community should maintain a safety 

culture that includes balanced 

consideration of safety and security? If 

not, what changes or additions should 

be made? 

(4) Should a discussion regarding 

complacency be added to the SOP and/ 

or to the traits that describe areas 

important to safety? 

(5) In late August 2010, the Institute 

of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) 

completed a validation study to assess 

the extent to which the factors that 

emerged from analyzing responses to a 

safety culture survey match the traits 

that were identified during the February 

2010 workshop. Only individuals 

working at nuclear reactors participated 

in the survey. 

The study provides general support 

for the traits developed at the workshop; 

however, the study provides a slightly 

different grouping. Under the validation 

study, there are nine traits: (1) 

Management Responsibility/ 

Commitment to Safety; (2) Willingness 

to Raise Concerns; (3) Decision-making; 

(4) Supervisor Responsibility for Safety; 

(5) Questioning Attitude; (6) Safety 

Communication; (7) Personal 

Responsibility for Safety; (8) Prioritizing 

Safety; and (9) Training Quality. Four of 

these are consistent with the eight traits 

developed by the workshop 

participants, i.e., Management 

Responsibility is consistent with 

Leadership Safety Values and Actions; 

Willingness to Raise Concerns relates to 

Environment for Raising Concerns; 

Safety Communication relates to 

Effective Safety Communication; and 

Personal Responsibility for Safety is 

consistent with Personal Accountability. 

The remaining five traits identified in 

the study, i.e., Decision-making, 

Supervisor Responsibility for Safety, 

Questioning Attitude, Prioritizing 

Safety, and Training Quality, are not as 

closely related (although they are not 

completely dissimilar). This is new 

information. The NRC is seeking 

stakeholder comments on this 

information though the FRN and 

through the public meeting scheduled 

for September 28 in Las Vegas. 

To ensure efficient consideration of 

your comments, if you are responding to 

a specific question, please identify it by 

number with your comment. When 

commenting, please exercise caution 

with regard to site-specific securityrelated information. Comments will be 

made available to the public in their 

entirety. Personal information such as 

your name, address, telephone number, 

and e-mail address will not be removed 

from your submission. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day 

of Sept, 2010. 

Roy P. Zimmerman, 

Director, Office of Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23249 Filed 9–16–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT 

Submission for Review: Federal Cyber 

Service: Scholarship for Service (SFS) 

Registration Web Site 

AGENCY: Office of Personnel 

Management. 

ACTION: 30-Day Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel 

Management (OPM), Human Resources 

Solutions Division, offers the general 

public and other Federal agencies the 

opportunity to comment on an existing 

information collection request (ICR) 

3206–0246, SFS Registration. As 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. 

chapter 35), as amended by the ClingerCohen Act (Pub. L. 104–106), OPM is 

soliciting comments for this collection. 

The information collection was 

previously published in the Federal 

Register on April 19, 2010 at 75 FR 

20400, allowing for a 60-day public 

comment period. One comment was 

received, and OPM provided a response. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow an 

additional 30 days for public comments. 

The Office of Management and Budget 

is particularly interested in comments 

that: 

1. Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

2. Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

3. Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

4. Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submissions 

of responses. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted until October 18, 2010. 

This process is conducted in accordance 

with 5 CFR 1320.1. 

ADDRESS: Interested persons are invited 

to submit written comments on the 

proposed information collection to the 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk 

Officer for the Office of Personnel 

Management or sent via electronic mail 

to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or 

faxed to (202) 395–6974. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A 

copy of this ICR, with applicable 

supporting documentation, may be 

obtained by contacting the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Office of Management and Budget, 725 

17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 

20503, Attention: Desk Officer for the 

Office of Personnel Management or sent 

via electronic mail to 

oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or faxed 

to (202) 395–6974. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SFS 

Program was established by the National 

Science Foundation in accordance with 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 180 / Friday, September 17, 2010 / Notices 57087 

1Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing 

A Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited 

Package Services 3 Negotiated Service Agreement 

and Application For Non-Public Treatment of 

Materials Filed Under Seal, September 1, 2010 

(Notice). 

2 Docket No. CP2009–50, Order Granting 

Clarification and Adding Global Expedited Package 

Services 2 to the Competitive Product List, August 

28, 2009 (Order No. 290). 

3Motion of the United States Postal Service for 

Temporary Relief, August 26, 2010 (Motion). 

4Order Granting Motion for Temporary Relief, 

August 27, 2010. 

the Federal Cyber Service Training and 

Education Initiative as described in the 

President’s National Plan for 

Information Systems Protection. This 

program seeks to increase the number of 

qualified students entering the fields of 

information assurance and computer 

security in an effort to respond to the 

threat to the Federal Government’s 

information technology infrastructure. 

The program provides selected 4-year 

colleges and universities scholarship 

grants to attract students to the 

information assurance field. 

Participating students who receive 

scholarships from this program are 

required to serve a 10-week internship 

during their studies and complete a 

post-graduation employment 

commitment equivalent to the length of 

the scholarship or one year, whichever 

is longer. Approval of the webpage is 

necessary to facilitate the timely 

registration, selection and placement of 

program-enrolled students in Federal 

agencies. 

Analysis 

Agency: Office of Personnel 

Management, Human Resources 

Solutions Division. 

Title: Scholarship for Service (SFS) 

Program Internet Site. 

OMB Number: 3206–0246. 

Frequency: Annually. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

Households. 

Number of Respondents: 630. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 1 

hour. 

Total Burden Hours: 630 hours. 

U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 

John Berry, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23232 Filed 9–16–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325–38–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket No. CP2010–104; Order No. 530] 

New Postal Product 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recently-filed Postal Service request to 

add a Global Expedited Package 

Services 3 contract to the competitive 

product list. This notice addresses 

procedural steps associated with this 

filing. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http:// 

www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot 

submit their views electronically should 

contact the person identified in FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 

telephone for advice on alternatives to 

electronic filing. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 

stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202–789– 

6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Notice of Filing 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

On September 1, 2010, the Postal 

Service filed a notice announcing that it 

has entered into an additional Global 

Expedited Package Services 3 (GEPS 3) 

contract.1 The Postal Service believes 

the instant contract is functionally 

equivalent to previously submitted 

GEPS contracts, and is supported by 

Governors’ Decision No. 08–7, attached 

to the Notice and originally filed in 

Docket No. CP2008–4. Id. at 1, 

Attachment 3. The Notice explains that 

Order No. 86, which established GEPS 

1 as a product, also authorized 

functionally equivalent agreements to be 

included within the product, provided 

that they meet the requirements of 39 

U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 2. In Order No. 290, 

the Commission approved the GEPS 2 

product.2 In Order No. 503, the 

Commission approved the GEPS 3 

product. Additionally, the Postal 

Service requested to have the contract in 

Docket No. CP2010–71 serve as the 

baseline contract for future functional 

equivalence analyses of the GEPS 3 

product. 

The instant contract. The Postal 

Service filed the instant contract 

pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition, 

the Postal Service contends that the 

instant contract is in accordance with 

Order No. 86. The Postal Service relates 

that the instant contract is for the same 

mailer as in Docket No. CP2009–60. It 

states that the mailer’s current contract 

was scheduled to terminate at the end 

of its one year term on August 31, 2010; 

however, it filed a Motion for 

Temporary Relief to extend the contract 

pending completion of the 

Commission’s review of the successor 

contract.3 The Commission granted an 

extension of the contract ‘‘until the 

sooner of the Commission’s order on the 

successor contract or September 30, 

2010.’’4

The term of the instant contract is 1 

year from the date the Postal Service 

notifies the customer that all necessary 

regulatory approvals have been 

received. Notice at 3. 

In support of its Notice, the Postal 

Service filed four attachments as 

follows: 

•Attachment 1—a redacted copy of 

the contract and applicable annexes; 

•Attachment 2—a certified statement 

required by 39 CFR 3015.5(c)(2) for the 

contract; 

•Attachment 3—a redacted copy of 

Governors’ Decision No. 08–7 which 

establishes prices and classifications for 

GEPS contracts, a description of 

applicable GEPS contracts, formulas for 

prices, an analysis of the formulas, and 

certification of the Governors’ vote; and 

•Attachment 4—an application for 

non-public treatment of materials to 

maintain redacted portions of the 

contract and supporting documents 

under seal. 

The Notice advances reasons why the 

instant GEPS 3 contract fits within the 

Mail Classification Schedule language 

for GEPS. The Postal Service identifies 

customer-specific information and 

general contract terms that distinguish 

the instant contract from the baseline 

GEPS 3 agreement. Id. at 4–5. It states 

that the differences, which include price 

variations based on updated costing 

information and volume commitments, 

do not alter the contract’s functional 

equivalency. Id. at 4. The Postal Service 

asserts that ‘‘[b]ecause the agreement 

incorporates the same cost attributes 

and methodology, the relevant 

characteristics of this GEPS contract are 

similar, if not the same, as the relevant 

characteristics of previously filed 

contracts.’’ Id. 

The Postal Service concludes that its 

filing demonstrates that this new GEPS 

3 contract complies with the 

requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and is 

functionally equivalent to the baseline 

GEPS 3 contract. Therefore, it requests 

that the instant contract be included 

within the GEPS 3 product. Id. at 5. 

II. Notice of Filing 

The Commission establishes Docket 

No. CP2010–104 for consideration of 

matters related to the contract identified 

in the Postal Service’s Notice. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1