alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Air Force testers cleared for Pegasus

              - Published  Oct. 8, 2015
              -                             By Daryl Mayer                                                    
              - 88th Air Base Wing Public Affairs

**WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, Ohio --  **
Now that Boeing has two aircraft -- one a 767-2C freighter and one a militarized KC-46A Pegasus tanker -- in the air, the program expects flight testing will really get off the ground. 
The path forward is for flight testing to validate that the aircraft meets performance requirements and achieves both Federal Aviation Administration and military certification.  Under the "test once" architecture, KC-46 will test systems once for both certifications.             So, it was vitally important to get Air Force developmental test crews cleared to participate in flight testing.      "Our EMD test program depends on an integrated effort between the Boeing and Air Force test teams.  Strong teamwork has been a hallmark for this group, so I'm excited to see them execute flights as one joint crew," said Brig. Gen. Duke Z. Richardson, the program executive officer for tankers at the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center.The Air Force Test Center team can now work side by side with Boeing and FAA officials to put the aircraft through a gauntlet of evaluations, methodically testing and validating that systems perform as expected. "These are exciting times because each flight progresses through its demonstration toward meeting the warfighter requirements.  There is still a lot of work on the horizon, but our flight path is set," said Col. Christopher Coombs, the KC-46 system program manager. The Air Force contracted with Boeing in February 2011 to acquire 179 KC-46A refueling tankers to begin recapitalizing the aging tanker fleet.  The program is currently working to meet the required assets available date, a milestone requiring 18 KC-46A aircraft and all necessary support equipment to be on the ramp, ready to support warfighter needs, by August 2017.

Pegasus tankerKC-46A
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 79 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6575]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                           ORDER OF PROCEDURE

  Mr. STEVENS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that I be 
permitted to make an announcement concerning hearings without regard to 
the pending bill.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.9

CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS,
HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 406 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED.

                   MEMORANDUM CONCERNING THE LICENSE AGREEMENT

THIS MEMORANDUM ("Memorandum") is made and entered into this 18th day of
October, 2002 by and between Shionogi & Co., Ltd., a Japanese corporation
("Shionogi") and Peninsula Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("Peninsula") concerning the License Agreement for S-4661 dated July 11, 2002
between the Parties hereto ("License Agreement") as follows;

ARTICLE 1 (DEFINITION)

Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, the capitalized terms wherever used
in this Memorandum shall have the same meanings as ascribed to them in the
License Agreement.

ARTICLE 2 (TARGET DATE)

The Parties agree to change the Target Date stipulated in Article 9.3 of the
License Agreement to "December 31, 2002".

ARTICLE 3 (SUPPLY PRICE FOR CLINICAL SAMPLES)

The price for 500 mg strength Clinical Samples supplied to Peninsula under the
License Agreement shall be at a price equal to [ * ] per vial ([ * ]/vial).

ARTICLE 4 (EFFECTIVE DATE)

This Memorandum shall be effective as of September 30, 2002 retroactively.

ARTICLE 5 (OTHER TERMS)

Except as supplemented herein, other terms and conditions provided in the
License Agreement shall be kept unchanged and in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Memorandum to be
executed in duplicate by their duly authorized representatives as of the day and
year first above written.

                                       1.

<PAGE>

SHIONOGI & CO., LTD.                             PENINSULA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

/s/ Masaharu Mori                                /s/ Paul F. Truex
----------------------------------               -------------------------------
Masaharu Mori                                    Paul F. Truex
General Manager                                  President
International Business Division

Date: 11/06/2002                                 Date: 10/18/2002

[ * ] = CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY
BRACKETS, HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 406 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED.

                                       2.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APP EAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DERRICK DESHAWN WILKERSON, Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D13-4074 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed July 18, 2014

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Jon B. Morgan, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on all issues but write to address a scrivener’s erro r in the written sentencing order. The court orally pronounced that “as to Count-II, you’ll be sen tenced to 25 years in the Florida Department of Corrections, 10 of which is a fire arm mandatory/minimum . . . .” In conflict with the oral pronouncement, the written sent ence reflects that a twenty-2 year firearm mandatory minimum was imposed on Count II. 1 The written sentence should be corrected to conform to the oral pronouncement. Croskey v. State, 71 So. 3d 199 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (remanding for correction of erroneous written se ntencing order to conform to oral pronouncement; explaining that written order im posing a twenty-year mandatory minimum pursuant to section 775.087(2)(a)2., Florida Statutes (2008), was erroneous where the jury specifically found appellant possessed but did not discharge a firearm and trial judge’s oral pro nouncement of a ten-year mini mum mandatory sentence pursuant to section 775.087(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2008), was correct); see also Douglas v. State, 39 Fla. L. Weekly D1251 (Fla. 1st DCA June 11, 2014) (affirming judgment and sentence but remanding for correction of written sentence to ma tch oral pronouncement). AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correc tion of scrivener’s error. TORPY, C.J., SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ., concur.

1 The written sentence not only conflicts with the oral pronounc ement but it also conflicts with the jury’s verdict finding that “the defendant d id actually possess and carry display, use or threaten to use a firearm.” See § 775.087(2)(a ), Fla. Stat. (2011) (providing that a defendant who possesses a firearm during the commission of the offense shall be sentenced to a minimum term of imprisonment of ten yea rs). On Count II, the jury did not find that the defendant discharged the firearm.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5086]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     VOTE FOR A BALANCED BUDGET NOW

  (Mr. PETE GEREN of Texas asked and was given permission to address 
the House for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. PETE GEREN of Texas. Mr. Speaker, a balanced budget is good for 
America. The status quo is bad. Bad for children, bad for seniors, bad 
for the middle class, and bad for the present and bad for the future.
  The status quo means Medicare goes broke in 6 years, not cut by 5 
percent, not cut by 7 percent, but goes broke. The status quo means 
financial ruin. That destroys our ability to defend ourselves, feed our 
children or meet our health care needs.
  Folks, the status quo means we go broke. Tomorrow we have a choice 
between four balanced budgets. I urge my colleagues to pick one. A 
balanced budget is good for America, good for all Americans, young and 
old. The time is now.

                          ____________________
```
|   | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 17, 2010 (the “Quarterly Report”) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date: June 22, 2010           |  /s/ Theodore Abajian                            |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                  |  Theodore Abajian                                     |
|                                                                                  |  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

----
News United States Air Force
 Jones swears in as Department of the Air Force financial management and comptroller leadPublished May 4, 2022
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)  --**
                Kristyn E. Jones was sworn in as Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Financial Management and ComptrollerMay 4, following her confirmation to the role by the U.S. Senate, April 28. 
 Prior to her confirmation, Jones, a U.S. Army veteran, most recently served as a Managing Director in KPMG’s Federal Advisory practice and as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Financial Information Management. 
 “We welcome Kristyn to the Department and recognize how fortunate we are to have her joining our team,” said Secretary of the Air Force**Frank Kendall**. “Her leadership and experience serving in various financial management and technology roles will be critical to supporting Department of the Air Force priorities as we look to acceleratetransformation to stay ahead of our pacing challenges.” 
 Jones joins the Department during a critical time and will be responsible for managing a nearly $200billion budget to modernize the Air and Space Forces.FS 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



swearing in 



ceremony 



readiness 



leadership 



financial management and comptroller 



Kristyn E. Jones 



confirmation 



SecAF 



Frank Kendall 



leader 



pacing challenges 



modernization
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Maintainers ready gunships for retirement 

              - Published  Feb. 5, 2014
              -                             By Airman 1st Class Eboni Reece                                                    
              - 27th Special Operations Wing Public Affairs

**CANNON AIR FORCE BASE, N.M. (AFNS) --  **
After more than four decades with the reputation by many as the Air Force’s “deadliest conventional weapon,” maintainers at the 27th Special Operations Wing are preparing the AC-130H Spectre for retirement.

A major player in every conflict since Vietnam, the AC-130H is now in the hands of maintainers from the 16th Aircraft Maintenance Unit, responsible for inspecting, repairing and maintaining the gunships. Currently there are eight gunships remaining in the Air Force inventory.

“Two of the eight aircraft will be static displays, one to be kept at Hurlburt Field, Fla., and the other to be kept here at Cannon,” said Master Sgt. Stephen White, lead production superintendent with the 27th Special Operations Maintenance Squadron. White explained that the remaining six gunships will be transported to Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Ariz., where they will be a part of the famed aircraft boneyard.

maintainersAC-130H Spectre
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7519

RAY A. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

MCKITHER BODISON,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. 

(6:09-cv-02695-HFF)

Submitted: December 9, 2010 Decided: December 28, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ray A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy

Assistant Attorney General, Alphonso Simon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, 

for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ray A. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice 

of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on June 15, 2010. The notice of appeal was filed on October 6, 

2010.*

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988).

 Because Williams failed to file a timely notice of appeal 

or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1116 

To require that the payment rate used to make any direct payments with 

respect to wheat for the 2008 through 2012 crop years be $1.20 per bushel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mrs. MUSGRAVE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To require that the payment rate used to make any direct 

payments with respect to wheat for the 2008 through 

2012 crop years be $1.20 per bushel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT RATE FOR DIRECT PAYMENTS FOR 

4 WHEAT FOR 2008 THROUGH 2012 CROP YEARS. 

5 The payment rate to be used to make any direct pay6 ments with respect to wheat for the 2008 through 2012 

7 crop years under section 1103 of the Farm Security and 

8 Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 7913) or any suc9 cessor provision of law shall be $1.20 per bushel. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

      ( print page 57458)    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-23650 Filed 9-17-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
#### BOROUGH OF HASBROUCK HEIGHTS v. PARK TERRACE GARDENS, INC.

January 17, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: CSAF Letter to Airmen, Red Hawk Arrives, Digital Promotion TestingPublished Nov. 17, 2023
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Britt Crolley
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, the new Air Force Chief of Staff, Gen. David W. Allvin, lays out his priorities in a letter to Airmen, the new T-7A training aircraft enters the next phase of developmental flight, and enlisted promotions testing goes digital. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Stephani Barge)



02:00


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



CSAF 



Teamwork 



Edwards AFB 



T-7A Red Hawk 



pilot training 



Kadena AB 



WAPS Related Links
        CSAF 23 Letter to Airmen
            
            T-7A Red Hawk arrival at Edwards AFB reflects integrated team effort
            
            Air Force digital promotion testing to launch at Kadena
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1045

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 210 Walnut 

Street in Des Moines, Iowa, as the ‘‘Neal Smith Federal 

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1045 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The Federal building located at 210 Walnut Street 

3 in Des Moines, Iowa, shall be known and designated as 

4 the ‘‘Neal Smith Federal Building’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

8 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be 

9 a reference to the ‘‘Neal Smith Federal Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 13, 

2007. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1045

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 210 

Smith Federal Building’’.Walnut Street in Des Moines, Iowa, as the ‘‘Neal
May 14 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

SMART MEALS, INC. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00638

- CV V.

RON C. BISHOP , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on April 5, 2012. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal. We further order that mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>   1


          Exhibit 11 - Statement Re: Computation of Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED             SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                       JUNE 30,                       JUNE 30,
                                                 1996            1997           1996           1997
                                                -------         -------        -------       -------   
<S>                                             <C>             <C>            <C>           <C>
Primary:

   Average Shares Outstanding                    18,386          22,022         16,324        21,696

   Net Effect of dilutive stock options -
        based on treasury stock method
        using average market price                1,384           1,105          1,328         1,212
                                                -------         -------        -------       -------   
Totals                                           19,770          23,127         17,652        22,908
                                                =======         =======        =======       =======
Net Income                                      $ 2,897         $ 4,432        $ 5,632       $ 8,726
                                                =======         =======        =======       =======
Earnings Per Share                              $   .15         $   .19        $   .32       $   .38
                                                =======         =======        =======       =======
                                                    
</TABLE>