```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7248-S7257]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          AMENDMENTS SUBMITTED

                                 ______

             THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

                                 ______

                BRADLEY (AND OTHERS) AMENDMENT NO. 1122

  Mr. BRADLEY (for himself, Mr. Breaux, Mrs. Murray, Ms. Moseley-Braun, 
Mr. Glenn, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Kennedy, and Mr. Lieberman) proposed an 
amendment to the concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 13) setting forth 
the congressional budget for the U.S. Government for the fiscal years 
1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002; as follows:

       On page 74, strike lines 12 through 24 and insert the 
     following: ``budget, the appropriate budgetary allocations, 
     aggregates, and levels shall be revised to reflect 
     $16,900,000,000 in budget authority and outlays of the 
     additional deficit reduction achieved as calculated under 
     subsection (c) for legislation that restores the full current 
     law earned income tax credit under section 32 of the Internal 
     Revenue Code of 1986.
       ``(b) Revised Allocations and Aggregates.--Upon the 
     reporting of legislation pursuant to subsection (a), and 
     again upon the submission of a conference report on such 
     legislation (if a conference report is submitted), the Chair 
     of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate may submit to 
     the Senate appropriately revised allocations under sections 
     302(a) and 602(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, 
     budgetary aggregates, and levels under this resolution, 
     revised by an amount that does not exceed the additional 
     deficit reduction specified under subsection (d).''.
                                 ______

                 GRAMM (AND OTHERS) AMENDMENT NO. 1123

  Mr. GRAMM (for himself, Mr. Coats, Mr. Coverdell, Mr. Craig, Mr. 
Faircloth, Mr. Grams, Mr. Helms, Mr. Kempthorne, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Lott, Mr. 
Mack, Mr. McCain, and Mr. Smith) proposed an amendment to the 
concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 13), supra; as follows:

       Strike all after the word ``Section'' on page 1, line 3 
     through page 79, line 15 and insert in lieu thereof the 
     following:

     1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996.

       (a) Declaration.--The Congress determines and declares that 
     this resolution is the concurrent resolution on the budget 
     for fiscal year 1996, including the appropriate budgetary 
     levels for fiscal years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 
     2002, as required by section 301 of the Congressional Budget 
     Act of 1974.
       (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this 
     concurrent resolution is as follows:

Sec. 1. Concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1996.

                      TITLE I--LEVELS AND AMOUNTS

Sec. 2. Recommended levels and amounts.
Sec. 3. Debt increase.
Sec. 4. Social Security.
Sec. 5. Major functional categories.
Sec. 6. Reconciliation.

             TITLE II--BUDGETARY RESTRAINTS AND RULEMAKING

Sec. 201. Discretionary spending limits.
Sec. 202. Extension of pay-as-you-go point of order.
Sec. 203. Tax reserve fund in the Senate.
Sec. 204. Scoring of emergency legislation.
Sec. 205. Budget surplus allowance.
Sec. 206. Sale of Government assets.
Sec. 207. Credit reform and guaranteed student loans.
Sec. 208. Extension of Budget Act 60-vote enforcement through 2002.
Sec. 209. Repeal of IRS allowance.
Sec. 210. Exercise of rulemaking powers.

            TITLE III--SENSE OF THE CONGRESS AND THE SENATE

Sec. 301. Restructuring Government and program terminations.
Sec. 302. Sense of the Senate regarding returning programs to the 
              States.
Sec. 303. Commercialization of Federal activities.
Sec. 304. Nonpartisan Advisory Commission on the CPI.
Sec. 305. Sense of the Congress on a uniform accounting system in the 
              Federal Government.
                      TITLE I--LEVELS AND AMOUNTS

     SEC. 2. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.

       The following budgetary levels are appropriate for the 
     fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002:
       (1) Federal revenues.--(A) For purposes of the enforcement 
     of this resolution--
       (i) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $1,051,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,063,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,112,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,165,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,220,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,285,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,353,900,000,000.
       (ii) The amounts by which the aggregate levels of Federal 
     revenues should be increased are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $8,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: -$19,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: -$22,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: -$21,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: -$25,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: -$28,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: -$31,100,000,000.
       (iii) The amounts for Federal Insurance Contributions Act 
     revenues for hospital insurance within the recommended levels 
     of Federal revenues are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $103,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $109,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $114,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $120,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $126,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $133,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $140,400,000,000.
       (B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act 
     (excluding the receipts and disbursements of the Hospital 
     Insurance Trust Fund)--
       (i) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $947,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $918,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $997,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,045,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,093,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,152,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,213,500,000,000.
       (ii) The amounts by which the aggregate levels of Federal 
     revenues should be changed as follows: [[Page S7249]] 
       Fiscal year 1996: $8,705,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: -$19,701,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: -$22,193,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: -$21,798,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: -$25,699,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: -$28,489,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: -$31,106,000,000.
       (2) New budget authority.--(A) For purposes of comparison 
     with the maximum deficit amount under sections 601(a)(1) and 
     606 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and for purposes 
     of the enforcement of this resolution, the appropriate levels 
     of total new budget authority are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $1,266,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,274,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,321,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,361,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,419,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,438,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,483,200,000,000.
       (B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act 
     (excluding the receipts and disbursements of the Hospital 
     Insurance Trust Fund), the appropriate levels of total new 
     budget authority are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $1,169,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,174,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,215,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,248,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,299,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,291,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,343,000,000,000.
       (3) Budget outlays.--(A) For purposes of comparison with 
     the maximum deficit amount under sections 601(a)(1) and 606 
     of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and for purposes of 
     the enforcement of this resolution, the appropriate levels of 
     total budget outlays are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $1,273,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,274,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,300,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,345,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,399,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,420,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,467,100,000,000.
       (B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act 
     (excluding the receipts and disbursements of the Hospital 
     Insurance Trust Fund), the appropriate levels of total budget 
     outlays are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $1,177,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,175,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,194,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,233,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,280,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,292,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,328,100,000,000.
       (4) Deficits.--(A) For purposes of comparison with the 
     maximum deficit amount under sections 601(a)(1) and 606 of 
     the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and for purposes of the 
     enforcement of this resolution, the amounts of the deficits 
     are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $221,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $211,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $187,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $179,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $178,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $135,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $113,200,000,000.
       (B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act 
     (excluding the receipts and disbursements of the Hospital 
     Insurance Trust Fund), the amounts of the deficits are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $229,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $220,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $196,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $188,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $186,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $140,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $114,600,000,000.
       (5) Public debt.--The appropriate levels of the public debt 
     are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $5,190,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $5,471,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $5,726,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $5,972,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $6,215,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $6,416,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $6,594,300,000,000.
       (6) Direct loan obligations.--The appropriate levels of 
     total new direct loan obligations are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $37,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $40,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $42,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $45,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $45,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $45,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $46,100,000,000.
       (7) Primary loan guarantee commitments.--The appropriate 
     levels of new primary loan guarantee commitments are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $193,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $187,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $185,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $185,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $184,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $186,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $187,600,000,000.

     SEC. 3. DEBT INCREASE.

       The amounts of the increase in the public debt subject to 
     limitation are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $287,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $280,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $255,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $245,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $243,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $201,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $177,400,000,000.

     SEC. 4. SOCIAL SECURITY.

       (a) Social Security Revenues.--For purposes of Senate 
     enforcement under sections 302 and 311 of the Congressional 
     Budget Act of 1974, the amounts of revenues of the Federal 
     Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal 
     Disability Insurance Trust Fund are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $347,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $392,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $411,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $430,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $452,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $475,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $498,600,000,000.
       (b) Social Security Outlays.--For purposes of Senate 
     enforcement under sections 302 and 311 of the Congressional 
     Budget Act of 1974, the amounts of outlays of the Federal 
     Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal 
     Disability Insurance Trust Fund are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $299,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $310,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $324,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $338,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $353,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $368,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $383,800,000,000.

     SEC. 5. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES.

       The Congress determines and declares that the appropriate 
     levels of new budget authority, budget outlays, new direct 
     loan obligations, and new primary loan guarantee commitments 
     for fiscal years 1996 through 2000 for each major functional 
     category are:
       (1) National Defense (050):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $257,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $261,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $253,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $257,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $259,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $254,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $266,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $259,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $276,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $267,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $275,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $267,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $275,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $269,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000.
       (2) International Affairs (150):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $18,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $18,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $18,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $18,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $18,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $18,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $18,300,000,000.
       (3) General Science, Space, and Technology (250):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,300,000,000. [[Page S7250]] 
       (B) Outlays, $16,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (4) Energy (270):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $2,900,000,000
       (B) Outlays, $2,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $1,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $1,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $4,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $3,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $4,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $4,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $4,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (5) Natural Resources and Environment (300):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $19,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $20,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $18,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $20,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $18,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (6) Agriculture (350):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,500,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,500,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $10,900,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,600,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $10,900,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000.
       (7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $2,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$7,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $1,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$5,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$7,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$5,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $1,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$2,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$3,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$3,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $123,100,000,000.
       (8) Transportation (400):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $36,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $38,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $38,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $32,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $39,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $31,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $40,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $31,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $0. [[Page S7251]] 
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $41,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $31,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $41,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $31,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $40,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $31,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (9) Community and Regional Development (450):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $5,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $5,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $7,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $5,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $5,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $5,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $5,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $5,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $5,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $4,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $5,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $4,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $5,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000.
       (10) Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services 
     (500):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $48,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $51,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $13,600,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $16,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $47,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $47,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $16,300,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $15,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $47,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $47,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $19,100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $15,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $47,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $46,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $21,800,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $14,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $47,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $47,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $21,900,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $15,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $47,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $46,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $22,000,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $15,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $47,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $46,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $22,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $16,600,000,000.
       (11) Health (550):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $118,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $119,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $124,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $124,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $128,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $128,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $132,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $132,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $136,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $136,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $140,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $140,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $144,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $144,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000.
       (12) Medicare (570):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $171,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $169,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $180,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $178,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $193,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $191,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $207,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $204,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $221,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $219,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $238,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $236,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $258,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $256,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (13) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security 
     Act, Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund:
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $61,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $60,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $66,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $65,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $73,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $73,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $81,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $81,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $90,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $89,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $100,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $99,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $112,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $111,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (14) Income Security (600):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $226,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $225,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $233,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $235,600,000,000. [[Page S7252]] 
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $253,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $246,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $256,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $257,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $272,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $272,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $277,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $277,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $291,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $291,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,000,000,000.
       (15) Social Security (650):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $5,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $9,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (16) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $37,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $36,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $26,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $37,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $37,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,100,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $21,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $37,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $38,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,000,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $19,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $37,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $38,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,000,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $18,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $37,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $39,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,200,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $19,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $38,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $40,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $19,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $38,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $40,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
     $20,600,000,000.
       (17) Administration of Justice (750):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $20,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $19,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $20,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $21,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $22,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
     Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $22,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $23,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
     Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $22,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $23,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $23,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $23,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (18) General Government (800):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (19) Net Interest (900):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $297,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $297,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $308,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $308,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $316,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $316,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $327,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $327,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $338,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $338,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $345,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $345,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $353,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $353,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (20) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security 
     Act, Net Interest (900):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, $308,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $308,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0. [[Page S7253]] 
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $319,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $319,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $326,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $326,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $336,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $336,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $346,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $346,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $350,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $350,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $356,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $356,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (21) The corresponding levels of gross interest on the 
     public debt are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1996: $369,198,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1997: $379,464,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $387,544,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $399,682,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $411,144,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $421,368,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $430,460,000,000.
       (22) Allowances (920):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, -$8,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$6,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, -$26,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$23,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, -$25,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$23,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, -$26,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$24,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$26,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$24,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$34,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$31,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$35,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$32,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (23) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, -$33,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$33,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, -$33,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$33,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, -$36,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$36,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, -$37,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$37,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$39,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$39,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$41,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$41,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$42,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$42,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       (24) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security 
     Act, Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):
       Fiscal year 1996:
       (A) New budget authority, -$30,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$30,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, -$31,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$31,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, -$33,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$33,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, -$34,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$34,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$36,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$36,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$37,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$37,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$39,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$39,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
     SEC. 6. RECONCILIATION.

       (a) Senate Committees.--Not later than July 14, 1995, the 
     committees named in this subsection shall submit their 
     recommendations to the Committee on the Budget of the Senate. 
     After receiving those recommendations, the Committee on the 
     Budget shall report to the Senate a reconciliation bill 
     carrying out all such recommendations without any substantive 
     revision.
       (1) Committee on agriculture, nutrition, and forestry.--The 
     Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 
     shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that 
     provide direct spending (as defined in section 250(c)(8) of 
     the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 
     1985) to reduce outlays $2,490,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, 
     $27,973,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996 through 
     2000, and $45,804,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996 
     through 2002.
       (2) Committee on armed services.--The Senate Committee on 
     Armed Services shall report changes in laws within its 
     jurisdiction that provide direct spending to reduce outlays 
     $21,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, $338,000,000 for the period 
     of fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and $649,000,000 for the 
     period of fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
       (3) Committee on banking, housing, and urban affairs.--The 
     Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs shall 
     report changes in laws within its jurisdiction to reduce the 
     deficit $373,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, $5,742,000,000 for 
     the period of fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and 
     $6,690,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996 through 
     2002.
       (4) Committee on commerce, science, and transportation.--
     The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 
     shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction to 
     reduce the deficit $2,464,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, 
     $21,937,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996 through 
     2000, and $33,685,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996 
     through 2002.
       (5) Committee on energy and natural resources.--The Senate 
     Committee on Energy and Natural Resources shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending to reduce outlays $1,771,000,000 in fiscal year 
     1996, $4,775,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996 
     through 2000, and $5,001,000,000 for the period of fiscal 
     years 1996 through 2002.
       (6) Committee on environment and public works.--The Senate 
     Committee on Environment and Public Works shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending to reduce outlays $106,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, 
     $1,290,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996 through 
     2000, and $2,236,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996 
     through 2002.
       (7) Committee on finance.--The Senate Committee on Finance 
     shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that 
     provide direct spending to reduce outlays $22,757,000,000 in 
     fiscal year 1996, $294,260,000,000 for the period of fiscal 
     years 1996 through 2000, and $544,302,000,000 for the period 
     of fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
       (8) Committee on foreign relations.--The Senate Committee 
     on Foreign Relations shall report changes in laws within its 
     jurisdiction that provide direct spending to reduce outlays 
     $0 in fiscal year 1996, $0 for the period of fiscal years 
     1996 through 2000, and $0 for the period of fiscal years 1996 
     through 2002.
       (9) Committee on governmental affairs.--The Senate 
     Committee on Governmental Affairs shall report changes in 
     laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending to 
     reduce outlays $118,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, 
     $3,023,000,000 for the period of [[Page S7254]] fiscal years 
     1996 through 2000, and $6,871,000,000 for the period of 
     fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
       (10) Committee on the judiciary.--The Senate Committee on 
     the Judiciary shall report changes in laws within its 
     jurisdiction that provide direct spending to reduce outlays 
     $119,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, $923,000,000 for the period 
     of fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and $1,483,000,000 for the 
     period of fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
       (11) Committee on labor and human resources.--The Senate 
     Committee on Labor and Human Resources shall report changes 
     in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending 
     to reduce outlays $1,141,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, 
     $9,165,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996 through 
     2000, and $13,795,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996 
     through 2002.
       (12) Committee on rules and administration.--The Senate 
     Committee on Rules and Administration shall report changes in 
     laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending to 
     reduce outlays $2,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, $280,000,000 
     for the period of fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and 
     $319,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996 through 
     2002.
       (13) Committee on veterans' affairs.--The Senate Committee 
     on Veterans' Affairs shall report changes in laws within its 
     jurisdiction that provide direct spending to reduce outlays 
     $301,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, $5,760,000,000 for the 
     period of fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and $10,002,000,000 
     for the period of fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
             TITLE II--BUDGETARY RESTRAINTS AND RULEMAKING

     SEC. 201. DISCRETIONARY SPENDING LIMITS.

       (a) Definition.--As used in this section and for the 
     purposes of allocations made pursuant to section 602(a) of 
     the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, for the discretionary 
     category, the term ``discretionary spending limit'' means--
       (1) with respect to fiscal year 1996--
       (A) for the defense category $258,379,000,000 in new budget 
     authority and $262,035,000,000 in outlays; and
       (B) for the nondefense category $219,441,000,000 in new 
     budget authority and $264,908,000,000 in outlays;
       (2) with respect to fiscal year 1997--
       (A) for the defense category $254,028,000,000 in new budget 
     authority and $257,695,000,000 in outlays; and
       (B) for the nondefense category $194,542,000,000 in new 
     budget authority and $234,248,000,000 in outlays;
       (3) with respect to fiscal year 1998--
       (A) for the defense category $260,321,000,000 in new budget 
     authority and $255,226,000,000 in outlays; and
       (B) for the nondefense category $201,387,000,000 in new 
     budget authority and $228,735,000,000 in outlays;
       (4) with respect to fiscal year 1999--
       (A) for the defense category $266,906,000,000 in new budget 
     authority and $260,331,000,000 in outlays; and
       (B) for the nondefense category $191,023,000,000 in new 
     budget authority and $225,240,000,000 in outlays;
       (5) with respect to fiscal year 2000--
       (A) for the defense category $276,644,000,000 in new budget 
     authority and $268,468,000,000 in outlays; and
       (B) for the nondefense category $195,215,000,000 in new 
     budget authority and $225,293,000,000 in outlays;
       (6) with respect to fiscal year 2001--
       (A) for the defense category $276,644,000,000 in new budget 
     authority and $268,468,000,000 in outlays; and
       (B) for the nondefense category $191,112,000,000 in new 
     budget authority and $223,790,000,000 in outlays; and
       (7) with respect to fiscal year 2002--
       (A) for the defense category $276,644,000,000 in new budget 
     authority and $270,000,000,000 in outlays; and
       (B) for the nondefense category $189,259,000,000 in new 
     budget authority and $222,060,000,000 in outlays;
     as adjusted for changes in concepts and definitions and 
     emergency appropriations.
       (b) Point of Order in the Senate.--
       (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), it 
     shall not be in order in the Senate to consider--
       (A) any concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 
     1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, or 2002 (or amendment, 
     motion, or conference report on such a resolution) that 
     provides discretionary spending in excess of the sum of the 
     defense and nondefense discretionary spending limits for such 
     fiscal year; or
       (B) any appropriations bill or resolution (or amendment, 
     motion, or conference report on such appropriations bill or 
     resolution) for fiscal year 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 
     2000, 2001, or 2002 that would exceed any of the 
     discretionary spending limits in this section or 
     suballocations of those limits made pursuant to section 
     602(b) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974.
       (2) Exception.--This section shall not apply if a 
     declaration of war by the Congress is in effect or if a joint 
     resolution pursuant to section 258 of the Balanced Budget and 
     Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 has been enacted.
       (c) Waiver.--This section may be waived or suspended in the 
     Senate only by the affirmative vote of three-fifths of the 
     Members, duly chosen and sworn.
       (d) Appeals.--Appeals in the Senate from the decisions of 
     the Chair relating to any provision of this section shall be 
     limited to 1 hour, to be equally divided between, and 
     controlled by, the appellant and the manager of the 
     concurrent resolution, bill, or joint resolution, as the case 
     may be. An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members of 
     the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required in the 
     Senate to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a 
     point of order raised under this section.
       (e) Determination of Budget Levels.--For purposes of this 
     section, the levels of new budget authority, outlays, new 
     entitlement authority, and revenues for a fiscal year shall 
     be determined on the basis of estimates made by the Committee 
     on the Budget of the Senate.

     SEC. 202. EXTENSION OF PAY-AS-YOU-GO POINT OF ORDER.

       (a) Purpose.--The Senate declares that it is essential to--
       (1) ensure continued compliance with the balanced budget 
     plan set forth in this resolution; and
       (2) continue the pay-as-you-go enforcement system.
       (b) Point of Order.--
       (1) In general.--It shall not be in order in the Senate to 
     consider any direct-spending or receipts legislation (as 
     defined in paragraph (3)) that would increase the deficit for 
     any one of the three applicable time periods (as defined in 
     paragraph (2)) as measured pursuant to paragraph (4).
       (2) Applicable time periods.--For purposes of this 
     subsection, the term ``applicable time period'' means any one 
     of the three following periods--
       (A) the first fiscal year covered by the most recently 
     adopted concurrent resolution on the budget;
       (B) the period of the first 5 fiscal years covered by the 
     most recently adopted concurrent resolution on the budget; or
       (C) the period of the 5 fiscal years following the first 5 
     years covered by the most recently adopted concurrent 
     resolution on the budget.
       (3) Direct-spending or receipts legislation.--For purposes 
     of this subsection, the term ``direct-spending or receipts 
     legislation'' shall--
       (A) except as otherwise provided in this subsection, 
     include all direct-spending legislation as that term is 
     interpreted for purposes of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
     Deficit Control Act of 1985;
       (B) include--
       (i) any bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or 
     conference report to which this subsection otherwise applies; 
     and
       (ii) the estimated amount of savings in direct-spending 
     programs applicable to
      that fiscal year resulting from the prior year's 
     sequestration under the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
     Deficit Control Act of 1985, if any (except for any 
     amounts sequestered as a result of a net deficit increase 
     in the fiscal year immediately preceding the prior fiscal 
     year); and
       (C) exclude--
       (i) any concurrent resolution on the budget; and
       (ii) full funding of, and continuation of, the deposit 
     insurance guarantee commitment in effect on the date of 
     enactment of the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990.
       (4) Baseline.--Estimates prepared pursuant to this section 
     shall--
       (A) use the baseline used for the most recent concurrent 
     resolution on the budget, and for years beyond those covered 
     by that concurrent resolution; and
       (B) abide by the requirements of subsections (a) through 
     (d) of section 257 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
     Deficit Control Act of 1985, except that references to 
     ``outyears'' in that section shall be deemed to apply to any 
     year (other than the budget year) covered by any one of the 
     time periods defined in paragraph (2) of this subsection.
       (c) Waiver.--This section may be waived or suspended in the 
     Senate only by the affirmative vote of three-fifths of the 
     Members, duly chosen and sworn.
       (d) Appeals.--Appeals in the Senate from the decisions of 
     the Chair relating to any provision of this section shall be 
     limited to 1 hour, to be equally divided between, and 
     controlled by, the appellant and the manager of the bill or 
     joint resolution, as the case may be. An affirmative vote of 
     three-fifths of the Members of the Senate, duly chosen and 
     sworn, shall be required in the Senate to sustain an appeal 
     of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under 
     this section.
       (e) Determination of Budget Levels.--For purposes of this 
     section, the levels of new budget authority, outlays, and 
     receipts for a fiscal year shall be determined on the basis 
     of estimates made by the Committee on the Budget of the 
     Senate.
       (f) Conforming Amendment.--Section 23 of House Concurrent 
     Resolution 218 (103d Congress) is repealed.
       (g) Sunset.--Subsections (a) through (e) of this section 
     shall expire September 30, 2002.

     SEC. 203. BUDGET SURPLUS ALLOWANCE.

       (a) Adjustments.--For the purposes of points of order under 
     the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Act of 1974 and this 
     concurrent resolution on the budget, the revenue aggregates 
     shall be reduced and other appropriate budgetary aggregates 
     and levels shall be revised to reflect the additional deficit 
     reduction achieved as calculated under section (c) for 
     legislation that reduces revenues.
       (b) Revised Aggregates.--Upon the reporting to the 
     Committee on the Budget of legislation that complies with 
     reconciliation directives of section 6, and upon the 
     reporting of the conference committee on such legislation (if 
     a conference report is submitted), [[Page S7255]] the 
     Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate shall 
     submit to the Senate appropriately revised budgetary 
     aggregates and levels by an amount that does not exceed the 
     additional deficit reduction calculated under subsection (d).
       (c) CBO Revised Deficit Estimate.--Upon the reporting to 
     the Committee on the Budget of legislation that complies with 
     reconciliation directives of section 6, and upon the 
     reporting of the conference committee on such legislation (if 
     a conference report is submitted), the Congressional Budget 
     Office shall provide the Chairman of the Committee on Budget 
     of the Senate a revised estimate of the deficit for fiscal 
     years 1996 through 2005 that assumes enactment of such 
     legislation.
       (d) Additional Deficit Reduction.--For purposes of this 
     section, the term ``additional deficit reduction'' means the 
     amount by which the total deficit levels assumed in this 
     resolution for a fiscal year exceed the revised deficit 
     estimate provided pursuant to subsection (c) for such fiscal 
     year for fiscal years 1996 through 2005.
       (e) CBO Certification and Contingencies.--This section 
     shall not apply unless--
       (1) the Director of the Congressional Budget Office has 
     provided the estimates required by subsection (c); and
       (2) the revisions made pursuant to this subsection do not 
     cause a budget deficit for fiscal year 2002, 2003, 2004, or 
     2005.

     SEC. 204. TAX RESERVE FUND IN THE SENATE.

       (a) In General.--Upon the reporting to the Committee on the 
     Budget of legislation complying with the reconciliation 
     requirements of Section 6, revenue and spending aggregates 
     shall be reduced and allocations shall be revised for 
     legislation that reduces revenues within the Finance 
     Committees jurisdiction by the following amounts:
       1996--$3,000,000,000;
       1997--$7,000,000,000;
       1998--$14,000,000,000;
       1999--$23,000,000,000;
       2000--$32,000,000,000;
       2001--$41,000,000,000;
       2002--$50,000,000,000.

     or by such amounts defined as ``additional deficit 
     reduction'' in section 203(d) if less than the amounts 
     specified herein, provided that the costs of such legislation 
     are not included in the concurrent resolution on the budget 
     and the enactment of such legislation will not increase the 
     deficit in this resolution for--
       (1) fiscal year 1996;
       (2) the period of fiscal years 1996 through 2000; or
       (3) the period of fiscal years 2001 through 2005.
       (b) Revised Allocations.--Upon the reporting of legislation 
     pursuant to subsection (a), and again upon the submission of 
     a conference report on such legislation (if a conference 
     report is submitted), the Chairman of the Committee on the 
     Budget of the Senate shall file with the Senate appropriately 
     revised allocations under sections 302(a) and 602(a) of the 
     Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and revised functional 
     levels and aggregates to carry out this subsection. These 
     revised allocations, functional levels, and aggregates shall 
     be considered for the purposes of the Congressional Budget 
     Act of 1974 as allocations, functional levels and aggregates 
     contained in this concurrent resolution on the budget.
       (c) Reporting Revised Allocations.--The appropriate 
     committee shall report appropriately revise allocations 
     pursuant to sections 302(b) and 602(b) of the Congressional 
     Budget Act of 1974 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 205. SCORING OF EMERGENCY LEGISLATION.

       Notwithstanding section 606(d)(2) of the Congressional 
     Budget Act of 1974 and beginning with fiscal year 1996, the 
     determinations under sections 302, 303, and 311 of such Act 
     shall take into account any new budget authority, new 
     entitlement authority, outlays, receipts, or deficit effects 
     as a consequence of the provisions of section 251(b)(2)(D) 
     and 252(e) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
     Control Act of 1985.

     SEC. 206. SALE OF GOVERNMENT ASSETS.

       (a) Sense of the Congress.--It is the sense of the Congress 
     that--
       (1) the prohibition on scoring asset sales has discouraged 
     the sale of assets that can be better managed by the private 
     sector and generate receipts to reduce the Federal budget 
     deficit;
       (2) the President's fiscal year 1996 budget included 
     $8,000,000,000 in receipts from asset sales and proposed a 
     change in the asset sale scoring rule to allow the proceeds 
     from these sales to be scored;
       (3) assets should not be sold if such sale would increase 
     the budget deficit over the long run; and
       (4) the asset sale scoring prohibition should be repealed 
     and consideration should be given to replacing it with a 
     methodology that takes into account the long-term budgetary 
     impact of asset sales.
       (b) Budgetary Treatment.--For purposes of any concurrent 
     resolution on the budget and the Congressional Budget and 
     Impoundment Control Act of 1974, the amounts realized from 
     sales of assets shall be scored with respect to the level of 
     budget authority, outlays, or revenues.
       (c) Definitions.--For purposes of this section, the term 
     ``sale of an asset'' shall have the same meaning as under 
     section 250(c)(21) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
     Deficit Control Act of 1985.
       (d) Treatment of Loan Assets.--For the purposes of this 
     section, the sale of loan assets or the prepayment of a loan 
     shall be governed by the terms of the Federal Credit Reform 
     Act of 1990.

     SEC. 207. CREDIT REFORM AND GUARANTEED STUDENT LOANS.

       For the purposes of allocations and points of order under 
     the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and this resolution, the 
     cost of a direct loan shall be the net present value, at the 
     time when the direct loan is disbursed, of the following cash 
     flows for the estimated life of the loan:
       (1) Loan disbursements.
       (2) Repayments of principal.
       (3) Payments of interest and other payments by or to the 
     Government over the life of the loan after adjusting for 
     estimated defaults, prepayments, fees, penalties, and other 
     recoveries.
       (4) In the case of legislation increasing direct loan 
     commitments for a program in which loan commitments will 
     equal or exceed $5,000,000,000 for the coming fiscal year (or 
     for any prior fiscal year), direct expenses, including--
       (A) activities related to credit extension, loan 
     origination, loan servicing, training, program promotion, 
     management of contractors, and payments to contractors, other 
     government entities, and program participants;
       (B) collection of delinquent loans; and
       (C) writeoff and closeout of loans.

     SEC. 208. EXTENSION OF BUDGET ACT 60-VOTE ENFORCEMENT THROUGH 
                   2002.

       Notwithstanding section 275(b) of the Balanced Budget and 
     Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (as amended by sections 
     13112(b) and 13208(b)(3) of the Budget Enforcement Act of 
     1990), the second sentence of section 904(c) of the 
     Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (except insofar as it 
     relates to section 313 of that Act) and the final sentence of 
     section 904(d) of that Act (except insofar as it relates to 
     section 313 of that Act) shall continue to have effect as 
     rules of the Senate through (but no later than) September 30, 
     2002.

     SEC. 209. REPEAL OF IRS ALLOWANCE.

       Section 25 of House Concurrent Resolution 218 (103d 
     Congress, 2d Session) is repealed.

     SEC. 210. EXERCISE OF RULEMAKING POWERS.

       The Senate adopts the provisions of this title--
       (1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the Senate, 
     and as such they shall be considered as part of the rules of 
     the Senate, and such rules shall supersede other rules only 
     to the extent that they are inconsistent therewith; and
       (2) with full recognition of the constitutional right of 
     the Senate to change those rules (so far as they relate to 
     the Senate) at any time, in the same manner, and to the same 
     extent as in the case of any other rule of the Senate.
                                 ______

                  EXON (AND OTHERS) AMENDMENT NO. 1124

  Mr. EXON (for himself, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Kennedy, Mrs. 
Murray, Mr. Breaux, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Dodd, and Mr. Bradley) proposed an 
amendment to the concurrent resolution S. Con. Res. 13, supra; as 
follows:

       On page 74, strike beginning with line 12 through line 12 
     on page 77 and insert the following: ``budget, the 
     appropriate budgetary allocations, aggregates, and levels 
     shall be revised to reflect--
       ``(1) $100,000,000,000 in budget authority and outlays of 
     the additional deficit reduction achieved as calculated under 
     subsection (c) for legislation that reduces the adverse 
     effects on medicare and medicaid of--
       ``(A) increased premiums;
       ``(B) increased deductibles;
       ``(C) increased copayments;
       ``(D) limits on the freedom to select the doctor of one's 
     choice;
       ``(E) reduced quality of health care services caused by 
     funding reductions for health care providers;
       ``(F) reduced or eliminated benefits caused by restrictions 
     on eligibility or services;
       ``(G) closure of hospitals or nursing homes, or other harms 
     to health care providers; or
       ``(H) other costs to beneficiaries;
       ``(2) $18,000,000,000 in budget authority and outlays of 
     the additional deficit reduction achieved as calculated under 
     subsection (c) for legislation that reduces the adverse 
     effects on discretionary spending on education and 
     $12,000,000,000 in budget authority and outlays for 
     legislation that reduces the adverse effects on direct 
     spending for education;
       ``(3) $10,000,000,000 in budget authority and outlays of 
     the additional deficit reduction achieved as calculated under 
     subsection (c) for legislation that reduces the adverse 
     effects on direct spending within the jurisdiction of the 
     Committee on Agriculture;
       ``(4) $17,000,000,000 in budget authority and outlays of 
     the additional deficit reduction achieved as calculated under 
     subsection (c) for legislation that restores the full current 
     law earned income tax credit under section 32 of the Internal 
     Revenue Code of 1986;
       ``(5) $3,000,000,000 in budget authority and outlays of the 
     additional deficit reduction achieved as calculated under 
     subsection (c) for legislation that reduces the adverse 
     effects on programs for veterans; and
       ``(6) $10,000,000,000 in budget authority and outlays of 
     the additional deficit reduction [[Page S7256]] achieved as 
     calculated under subsection (c) which shall be subject to 
     allocation by the Committee on the Budget, by majority vote.

     The amounts provided by paragraphs (1) through (6) shall be 
     proportionally adjusted based on any increase or decrease in 
     the projected allowance of $170,000,000,000.
       ``(b) Revised Allocations and Aggregates.--Upon the 
     reporting of legislation pursuant to subsection (a), and 
     again upon the submission of a conference report on such 
     legislation (if a conference report is submitted), the Chair 
     of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate may submit to 
     the Senate appropriately revised allocations under sections 
     302(a) and 602(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, 
     discretionary spending limits under section 201(a) of this 
     resolution, budgetary aggregates, and levels under this 
     resolution, revised by an amount that does not exceed the 
     additional deficit reduction specified under subsection (d).
       ``(c) CBO Revised Deficit Estimate.--After the enactment of 
     legislation that complies with the reconciliation directives 
     of section 6, the Congressional Budget Office shall provide 
     the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate a 
     revised estimate of the deficit for fiscal years 1996 through 
     2005.
       ``(d) Additional Deficit Reduction.--For purposes of this 
     section, the term ``additional deficit reduction'' means the 
     amount by which the total deficit levels assumed in this 
     resolution for a fiscal year exceed the revised deficit 
     estimate provided pursuant to subsection (c) for such fiscal 
     year for fiscal years 1996 through 2005.
       ``(e) CBO Certification and Contingencies.--This section 
     shall not apply unless--
       ``(1) legislation has been enacted complying with the 
     reconciliation directives of section 6;
       ``(2) the Director of the Congressional Budget Office has 
     provided the estimate required by subsection (c); and
       ``(3) the revisions made pursuant to this subsection do not 
     cause a budget deficit for fiscal year 2002, 2003, 2004, and 
     2005.

     ``SEC. 205. SCORING OF EMERGENCY LEGISLATION.

       ``Notwithstanding section 606(d)(2) of the Congressional 
     Budget Act of 1974 and beginning with fiscal year 1996, the 
     determinations under sections 302, 303, and 311 of such Act 
     shall take into account any new budget authority, new 
     entitlement authority, outlays, receipts, or deficit effects 
     as a consequence of the provisions of section 251(b)(2)(D) 
     and 252(e) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
     Control Act of 1985.''.
                                 ______

                THURMOND (AND OTHERS) AMENDMENT NO. 1125

  Mr. THURMOND (for himself, Mr. McCain, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Warner, 
Mr. Coats, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Kempthorne, Mr. Lott, Mr. Smith, Mr. Cohen, 
Mr. Santorum, and Mr. Stevens) proposed an amendment to the concurrent 
resolution S. Con. Res. 13, supra; as follows:

       On page 11, line 7, increase the amount by $9,600,000,000.
       On page 11, line 8, increase the amount by $4,000,000,000.
       On page 11, line 14, increase the amount by 
     $15,900,000,000.
       On page 11, line 15, increase the amount by $8,300,000,000.
       On page 11, line 21, increase the amount by 
     $17,700,000,000.
       On page 11, line 22, increase the amount by 
     $10,800,000,000.
       On page 12, line 3, increase the amount by $15,100,000,000.
       On page 12, line 4, increase the amount by $11,700,000,000.
       On page 12, line 10, increase the amount by 
     $11,300,000,000.
       On page 12, line 11, increase the amount by 
     $11,500,000,000.
       On page 12, line 17, increase the amount by 
     $11,400,000,000.
       On page 12, line 18, increase the amount by 
     $11,600,000,000.
       On page 12, line 24, increase the amount by 
     $11,300,000,000.
       On page 12, line 25, increase the amount by 
     $10,000,000,000.
       On page 54, line 20, decrease the amount by $9,600,000,000.
       On page 54, line 21, decrease the amount by $4,000,000,000.
       On page 55, line 2, decrease the amount by $15,900,000,000.
       On page 55, line 3, decrease the amount by $8,300,000,000.
       On page 55, line 9, decrease the amount by $17,700,000,000.
       On page 55, line 10, decrease the amount by 
     $10,800,000,000.
       On page 55, line 16, decrease the amount by 
     $15,100,000,000.
       On page 55, line 17, decrease the amount by 
     $11,700,000,000.
       On page 55, line 23, decrease the amount by 
     $11,300,000,000.
       On page 55, line 24, decrease the amount by 
     $11,500,000,000.
       On page 56, line 5, decrease the amount by $11,400,000,000.
       On page 56, line 6, decrease the amount by $11,600,000,000.
       On page 56, line 12, decrease the amount by 
     $11,300,000,000.
       On page 56, line 13, decrease the amount by 
     $10,000,000,000.
       On page 65, line 14, increase the amount by $9,600,000,000.
       On page 65, line 15, increase the amount by $4,000,000,000.
       On page 65, line 17, decrease the amount by $9,600,000,000.
       On page 65, line 18, decrease the amount by $4,000,000,000.
       On page 65, line 21, increase the amount by 
     $15,900,000,000.
       On page 65, line 22, increase the amount by $8,300,000,000.
       On page 65, line 24, decrease the amount by 
     $15,900,000,000.
       On page 65, line 25, decrease the amount by $8,300,000,000.
       On page 66, line 3, increase the amount by $17,700,000,000.
       On page 66, line 4, increase the amount by $10,800,000,000.
       On page 66, line 6, decrease the amount by $17,700,000,000.
       On page 66, line 7, decrease the amount by $10,800,000,000.
       On page 66, line 10, increase the amount by 
     $15,100,000,000.
       On page 66, line 11, increase the amount by 
     $11,700,000,000.
       On page 66, line 13, decrease the amount by 
     $15,100,000,000.
       On page 66, line 14, decrease the amount by 
     $11,700,000,000.
       On page 66, line 17, increase the amount by 
     $11,300,000,000.
       On page 66, line 18, increase the amount by 
     $11,500,000,000.
       On page 66, line 20, decrease the amount by 
     $11,300,000,000.
       On page 66, line 21, decrease the amount by 
     $11,500,000,000.
       On page 66, line 24, increase the amount by 
     $11,400,000,000.
       On page 66, line 25, increase the amount by 
     $11,600,000,000.
       On page 67, line   , decrease the amount by 
     $11,400,000,000.
       On page 67, line   , decrease the amount by 
     $11,600,000,000.
       On page 67, line 6, increase the amount by $11,300,000,000.
       On page 67, line 7, increase the amount by $10,000,000,000.
       On page 67, line 9, decrease the amount by $11,300,000,000.
       On page 67, line 10, decrease the amount by 
     $10,000,000,000.
       On page 68, after line 12, add the following new paragraph:
       (3) It is the sense of the Senate that the Senate should 
     waive all points of order that would preclude increasing non-
     defense spending in any one fiscal year by up to $2 billion 
     and, at the same time, decreasing defense spending in any one 
     fiscal year by up to $2 billion, from the levels of 
     discretionary spending in this section. It is further the 
     sense of the Senate that defense spending may not be reduced 
     by more than a total of $10 billion and non-defense spending 
     may not be increased by more than a total of $10 billion over 
     the seven years of the resolution, from the levels of 
     discretionary spending in this section.
                                 ______

                HARKIN (AND BUMPERS) AMENDMENT NO. 1126

  Mr. HARKIN (for himself and Mr. Bumpers) proposed an amendment to the 
concurrent resolution, Senate Concurrent Resolution 13, supra; as 
follows:

       On page 12, line 3, decrease the amount by $4,800,000,000.
       On page 12, line 4, decrease the amount by $1,000,000,000.
       On page 12, line 10, decrease the amount by 
     $10,000,000,000.
       On page 12, line 11, decrease the amount by $3,400,000,000.
       On page 12, line 17, decrease the amount by 
     $10,000,000,000.
       On page 12, line 18, decrease the amount by $6,200,000,000.
       On page 12, line 24, decrease the amount by 
     $10,000,000,000.
       On page 12, line 25, decrease the amount by $6,200,000,000.
       On page 32, line 11, increase the amount by $4,800,000,000.
       On page 32, line 12, increase the amount by $1,000,000,000.
       On page 32, line 19, increase the amount by 
     $10,000,000,000.
       On page 32, line 20, increase the amount by $3,400,000,000.
       On page 33, line 2, increase the amount by $10,000,000,000.
       On page 33, line 3, increase the amount by $6,200,000,000.
       On page 33, line 10, increase the amount by 
     $10,000,000,000.
       On page 33, line 11, increase the amount by $6,200,000,000.
       On page 66, line 10, decrease the amount by $4,800,000,000.
       On page 66, line 11, decrease the amount by $1,000,000,000.
       On page 66, line 13, increase the amount by $4,800,000,000.
       On page 66, line 14, increase the amount by $1,000,000,000.
       On page 66, line 17, decrease the amount by 
     $10,000,000,000.
       On page 66, line 18, decrease the amount by $3,400,000,000.
       On page 66, line 20, increase the amount by 
     $10,000,000,000.
       On page 66, line 21, increase the amount by $3,400,000,000.
       On page 66, line 24, decrease the amount by 
     $10,000,000,000. [[Page S7257]] 
       On page 66, line 25, decrease the amount by $6,200,000,000.
       On page 67, line 2, increase the amount by $10,000,000,000.
       On page 67, line 3, increase the amount by $6,200,000,000.
       On page 67, line 6, decrease the amount by $10,000,000,000.
       On page 67, line 7, decrease the amount by $6,200,000,000.
       On page 67, line 9, increase the amount by $10,000,000,000.
       On page 67, line 10, increase the amount by $6,200,000,000.
                                 ______

                FEINGOLD (AND OTHERS) AMENDMENT NO. 1127

  Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself, Mr. Hollings, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Nunn, Mr. 
Bumpers, Mr. Kerrey, Mr. Robb, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Simon, Mrs. Murray, and 
Ms. Moseley-Braun) proposed an amendment to the concurrent resolution, 
Senate Concurrent Resolution 13, supra; as follows:

       On page 74, strike beginning with line 8 through page 75, 
     line 22.
                                 ______

                 SNOWE (AND OTHERS) AMENDMENT NO. 1128

  Ms. SNOWE (for herself, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Brown, Mrs. 
Kassebaum, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Lott, Mr. Chafee, and Mr. Simpson) proposed 
an amendment to the concurrent resolution, Senate Concurrent Resolution 
13, supra; as follows:

       On page 26, decrease the amount on line 20 by $200,000,000.
       On page 26, decrease the amount on line 21 by $100,000,000.
       On page 27, decrease the amount on line 3 by $200,000,000.
       On page 27, decrease the amount on line 4 by $300,000,000.
       On page 27, decrease the amount on line 11 by $200,000,000.
       On page 27, decrease the amount on line 12 by $300,000,000.
       On page 27, decrease the amount on line 19 by $200,000,000.
       On page 27, decrease the amount on line 20 by $300,000,000.
       On page 28, decrease the amount on line 2 by $200,000,000.
       On page 28, decrease the amount on line 3 by $300,000,000.
       On page 28, decrease the amount on line 10 by $200,000,000.
       On page 28, decrease the amount on line 11 by $300,000,000.
       On page 28, decrease the amount on line 18 by $200,000,000.
       On page 28, decrease the amount on line 19 by $300,000,000.
       On page 31, increase the amount on line 12 by $900,000,000.
       On page 31, increase the amount on line 13 by $500,000,000.
       On page 31, increase the amount on line 20 by 
     $1,000,000,000.
       On page 31, increase the amount on line 21 by $800,000,000.
       On page 32, increase the amount on line 3 by 
     $1,000,000,000.
       On page 32, increase the amount on line 4 by $900,000,000.
       On page 32, increase the amount on line 11 by 
     $1,000,000,000.
       On page 32, increase the amount on line 12 by 
     $1,000,000,000.
       On page 32, increase the amount on line 19 by 
     $1,000,000,000.
       On page 32, increase the amount on line 20 by 
     $1,100,000,000.
       On page 33, increase the amount on line 2 by 
     $1,000,000,000.
       On page 33, increase the amount on line 3 by 
     $1,100,000,000.
       On page 33, increase the amount on line 10 by 
     $1,000,000,000.
       On page 33, increase the amount on line 11 by 
     $1,100,000,000.
       On page 48, decrease the amount on line 10 by $300,000,000.
       On page 48, decrease the amount on line 17 by $300,000,000.
       On page 48, decrease the amount on line 24 by $300,000,000.
       On page 48, decrease the amount on line 25 by $100,000,000.
       On page 49, decrease the amount on line 6 by $300,000,000.
       On page 49, decrease the amount on line 7 by $200,000,000.
       On page 49, decrease the amount on line 13 by $300,000,000.
       On page 49, decrease the amount on line 14 by $300,000,000.
       On page 49, decrease the amount on line 20 by $300,000,000.
       On page 49, decrease the amount on line 21 by $300,000,000.
       On page 50, decrease the amount on line 2 by $300,000,000.
       On page 50, decrease the amount on line 3 by $300,000,000.
       On page 54, decrease the amount on line 20 by $400,000,000.
       On page 54, decrease the amount on line 21 by $400,000,000.
       On page 55, decrease the amount on line 2 by $500,000,000.
       On page 55, decrease the amount on line 3 by $500,000,000.
       On page 55, decrease the amount on line 9 by $500,000,000.
       On page 55, decrease the amount on line 10 by $500,000,000.
       On page 55, decrease the amount on line 16 by $500,000,000.
       On page 55, decrease the amount on line 17 by $500,000,000.
       On page 55, decrease the amount on line 23 by $500,000,000.
       On page 55, decrease the amount on line 24 by $500,000,000.
       On page 56, decrease the amount on line 5 by $500,000,000.
       On page 56, decrease the amount on line 6 by $500,000,000.
       On page 56, decrease the amount on line 12 by $500,000,000.
       On page 56, decrease the amount on line 13 by $500,000,000.
       On page 64, decrease the amount on line 9 by $500,000,000.
       On page 64, decrease the amount on line 10 by 
     $4,300,000,000.
       On page 64, decrease the amount on line 11 by 
     $6,500,000,000.
       On page 65, decrease the amount on line 17 by $900,000,000.
       On page 65, decrease the amount on line 18 by $500,000,000.
       On page 65, decrease the amount on line 24 by 
     $1,000,000,000.
       On page 65, decrease the amount on line 25 by $800,000,000.
       On page 66, decrease the amount on line 6 by 
     $1,000,000,000.
       On page 66, decrease the amount on line 7 by $900,000,000.
       On page 66, decrease the amount on line 13 by 
     $1,000,000,000.
       On page 66, decrease the amount on line 14 by 
     $1,000,000,000.
       On page 66, decrease the amount on line 20 by 
     $1,000,000,000.
       On page 66, decrease the amount on line 21 by 
     $1,100,000,000.
       On page 67, decrease the amount on line 2 by 
     $1,000,000,000.
       On page 67, decrease the amount on line 3 by 
     $1,100,000,000.
       On page 67, decrease the amount on line 9 by 
     $1,000,000,000.
       On page 67, decrease the amount on line 10 by 
     $1,100,000,000.
                                 ______

               STEVENS (AND DOMENICI) AMENDMENT NO. 1129

  Mr. STEVENS (for himself and Mr. Domenici) proposed an amendment to 
the concurrent resolution Senate Concurrent Resolution 13, supra; as 
follows:

       At the appropriate place in Title III of the resolution 
     insert the following new section:

     SEC.   . SENSE OF THE CONGRESS REGARDING FULL FUNDING FOR 
                   DECADE OF THE BRAIN RESEARCH.

       (a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
       (1) long term health care costs associated with diseases 
     and disorders of the brain have a substantial impact on 
     federal expenditures for Medicaid and Medicare, and on the 
     earning potential of the Nation;
       (2) to highlight the impact of brain diseases and disorders 
     on the economy and well being of the Nation the Congress has 
     declared the 1990's the Decade of the Brain;
       (3) meaningful research has been initiated as part of the 
     Decade of the Brain;
       (4) if fully funded this research could provide important 
     new medical breakthroughs; and
       (5) these breakthroughs could result in a significant 
     reduction in costs to the Federal Government.
       (b) Sense of the Congress.--It is the sense of the Congress 
     that in furtherance of the goals of the Decade of the Brain 
     the appropriate committees should seek to ensure that full 
     funding is provided for research on brain diseases and 
     disorders in each of the fiscal years to which this 
     resolution applies.
                                 ______

                BUMPERS (AND OTHERS) AMENDMENT NO. 1130

  Mr. BUMPERS (for himself, Mr. Bradley, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Lieberman, 
Mr. Baucus, Mr. Exon, Mr. Wellstone, Mrs. Boxer, and Mrs. Feinstein) 
proposed an amendment to the concurrent resolution, Senate Concurrent 
Resolution 13, supra; as follows:

       Strike line 7 on page 76 through line 12 on page 77.
       

                          ____________________
```