alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 12-14-00091-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

KIMBERLY COLETTE WILSON, 

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by Appellant 

and her counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, Appellant’s 

motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Opinion delivered April 30, 2014.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

APRIL 30, 2014

NO. 12-14-00091-CR

KIMBERLY COLETE WILSON,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law No 2 

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 002-81950-12)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss 

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and 

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, and Hoyle, J.
583 A.2d 339

#### IN THE MATTER OF AN INQUIRY INTO THE MEDICAL PRACTICE OF MELVIN SCHULMAN, MD.

March 7, 1990.

Motion of the State Board of Medical Examiners for leave to appeal is granted and the order of the Appellate Division is summarily modified to provide that the matter be remanded to the Superior Court, Law Division, for the limited purpose of developing a record, the Appellate Division to retain jurisdiction. This Court does not retain jurisdiction.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 44 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 44

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
       Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003, and for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RENEWAL OF IMPORT RESTRICTIONS UNDER BURMESE FREEDOM AND 
              DEMOCRACY ACT OF 2003.

    Congress approves the renewal of import restrictions contained in 
section 3(a)(1) of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

SEC. 2. MERCHANDISE PROCESSING FEES.

    Section 13031(j)(3)(A) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(j)(3)(A)) is amended by 
striking ``October 14, 2014'' and inserting ``October 21, 2014''.

SEC. 3. TIME FOR PAYMENT OF CORPORATE ESTIMATED TAXES.

    Subparagraph (B) of section 401(1) of the Tax Increase Prevention 
and Reconciliation Act of 2005 is amended by striking ``114.50 
percent'' and inserting ``114.75 percent''.

SEC. 4. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    This joint resolution shall be deemed to be a ``renewal 
resolution'' for purposes of section 9 of the Burmese Freedom and 
Democracy Act of 2003.

SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This joint resolution and the amendments made by this joint 
resolution shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this joint 
resolution or July 26, 2007, whichever occurs first.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 44

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
       Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003, and for other purposes.
```
News United States Air Force
 TRICARE young adult premiums to increase Jan. 1Published Nov. 5, 2015
                        
                        
                        TRICARE
                **FALLS CHURCH, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Premiums for the Military Health System’s benefit plan for adult children between 21 and 26 years old have been announced. The premiums for TRICARE Young Adult (TYA) program will increase on Jan. 1 to $306 per month for TYA Prime, and $228 per month for TYA Standard.
“Offering the option to have young adults covered under these plans falls in line with what all Americans are able to do with their adult children under the Affordable Care Act,” said Mary Kaye Justis, the director of the TRICARE Health Plan. “We want to make sure those wanting this coverage know all the facts as they go into the open enrollment season for health care plans in this country.”
Justis explained the increase is due to the requirement in the National Defense Authorization Act of 2011 that TRICARE set TYA premiums to cover the full cost of health care received by the program’s beneficiaries. Previous years’ premiums were lower because TRICARE did not yet have sufficient cost data to set annual premiums. This coming year marks the first time TRICARE has had enough actual cost data to set the premiums based on actual costs rather than predicted cost.  
“We are required by law to be cost-neutral to the government, so the premiums had to be raised to cover the actual cost of care,” Justis said.
TYA offers very generous, competitive coverage for young adults, Justis said. Although the premiums do not go into effect until Jan. 1, TRICARE leaders want to make sure TYA beneficiaries have all the facts now to make the best decision possible, based on their needs and circumstances, during the open enrollment season from Nov. 1 through Jan. 31.
“We like having young adults in our system and welcome them to stay on,” Justis said. “But they do have options.”
Other health care options for young adult beneficiaries include:
- Purchasing TYA Standard -- lower premiums, higher cost shares -- instead of TYA Prime
- Enrolling in a parent’s civilian health insurance plan, if available
- Purchasing coverage through the college or university, if enrolled
- Purchasing a plan offered through the Health Insurance Marketplace at www.healthcare.gov  
- Lower cost plans may be available depending on income and residence, and assistance paying premiums may be available if beneficiaries qualify for government subsidies through commercial plans
Visit www.tricare.mil/TYA for more information.TRICARE
#### INTERNATIONAL FOOD COMPANY v. PRICE BAKING POWDER COMPANY.

Trademarks.

The word “Cream” is registerable as a technical trademark for baking' powder. (Chief Justice Shepard dissenting.)

No. 634.

Patent Appeals.

Submitted March 15, 1911.

Decided April 5, 1911.

Hearing on an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, dismissing an opposition to the registration of a: trademark.

*Affirmed.*

the facts are stated in the opinion.

*Mr. A. Q. Paul*and *Mr. Wm. G. Henderson*for the appellant

*Mr. Archibald Cox*for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Van Orsdel

delivered the opinion of the Court r

This is an opposition by the appellant company, the International Food Company, to the registration of the word “Cream” as a trademark for baking powder by the appelleecompany, the Price Baking Powder Company. It was beld to be entitled to registration by botb the tribunals of the Patent-: Office. From the decision of the Commissioner, dismissing-the opposition, this appeal was taken.

It appears tbat appellee bas used the mark since 1866 in connection with “Dr. Price’s” or “Price’s Baking Powder.”' It is conceded tbat appellee was the prior user. Hence, the sole question bere presented is whether or not the word “cream”’ *138is registrable as a technical trademark for baking powder. 'This question has been before the courts, and in each instance •it has been held to be a valid technical trademark. *Price Baking-Powder Co.*v. *Fyfe,*45 Fed. 799; *Albers Bros. Mill. Co. Acme Mills Co.*171 Fed. 989. See also Paul, Trade-Marks, sec. 64.

With the conclusion reached in these cases and in the opinion of the Commissioner of Patents, we find no reason to disagree. The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and the -clerk is directed to certify these proceedings as by law required.

*Affirmed.*

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard dissenting.
News United States Air Force
 Tuskegee Airmen 75th anniversary: Documentary trailerPublished March 22, 2016
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)** -- March 22 is the 75th anniversary of the activation of the U.S. Army Air Corps' 99th Pursuit Squadron, the Tuskegee Airmen. 
This trailer is part of a documentary that will be released on AF.mil this July.Tuskegee Airmen 



anniversary 



U.S. Army Air Corps
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2410

_____________________________
B ONNIE S UE B OTTIN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court fo r Santa Rosa County

. John F. Simon
, Jr., Judge

. December 12, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , W ETHERELL , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9. 330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Order filed July 28, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00500-CV

___________

MYRTIS ALEXANDER, Appellant

V.

COLLONADE SKILLED NURSING FACILITY, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 541012102

O R D E R

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter for 

County Civil Court at Law No. 2 informed this court that appellant had not made 

arrangements for payment for the reporter’s record. On June 30, 2016, the clerk of 

this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that do 

not require a reporter’s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided 

this court with proof of payment for the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). 

Appellant filed no reply. 
Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal by August 29, 

2016. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court will dismiss the appeal 

for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
#### G. *F.*Harper et als. v. Wm. Kelley.

(No. 97, Op. Book No. 1, p. 231.)

Appeal from Wilson County.

April 23, 1877.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 21. *Suggestion of delay, effect of.*The effect of a suggestion of delay by appellee on appeal is to open up the entire record, and requires a reversal of the judgment for any error apparent upon the face of it.

§ 22. *Parol evidence,■ when admissible to vary written instrument.*While, as a general rule, verbal evidence is not admissible to contradict or alter a written instrument, this rule does not exclude such evidence when it is introduced to prove that the written agreement is totally discharged. Neither is this rule infringed by the admission of oral evidence to prove a new and distinct agreement upon a new consideration, whether it be a substitute for the old or in addition to and beyond it. And if subsequent, and involving the same subject matter, it is immaterial whether the new agreement be entirely oral or whether it refer to and ¡martially or totally adopts the provisions of the former contract in writing, provided the old agreement be abandoned and rescinded. [Hogan v. Crawford, 31 Tex. 635; Smith v. Garrett, 29 Tex. 48; 1 Greenl. Ev. §§ 303, 304.]

Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                          25,834
<SECURITIES>                                 2,356,117
<RECEIVABLES>                                  355,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    561,431
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,288,717
<PP&E>                                         230,344
<DEPRECIATION>                               (214,524)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,354,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          237,090
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,136,318
<OTHER-SE>                                (18,094,683)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,354,425
<SALES>                                        313,147
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               347,361
<CGS>                                          265,990
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  520,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (172,864)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       725
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (173,589)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (173,589)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1016 

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 

to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into cooperative agreements with any of the management partners of the Boston Harbor 

Islands National Recreation Area, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2007 

Mr. DELAHUNT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to authorize the Secretary of the 

Interior to enter into cooperative agreements with any 

of the management partners of the Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 1016 IH

1 SECTION 1. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS FOR BOSTON 

2 HARBOR ISLANDS NATIONAL RECREATION 

3 AREA. 

4 Paragraph (3) of section 1029(d) of the Omnibus 

5 Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 (16 

6 U.S.C. 460kkk(d)(3)) is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(3) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—The Sec8 retary may consult and enter into one or more coop9 erative agreements with the Commonwealth of Mas10 sachusetts or any political subdivision thereof or 

11 with any partnership entity named in subsection 

12 (e)(2), to acquire from and provide to the Common13 wealth of Massachusetts or its political subdivisions, 

14 or any such partnership entity, goods and services to 

15 be used in the cooperative management of lands 

16 within the recreation area, for construction of park 

17 facilities, or any other purpose consistent with the 

18 purposes of the recreation area as stated in sub19 section (a), if the Secretary determines that appro20 priations or other funds for that purpose are avail21 able and that the cooperative agreement is in the 

22 best interests of the United States.’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
FILED 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 October 14, 2005 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-11720

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00069-CR-WS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

TONY O'NEAL LLOYD, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

_________________________

(October 14, 2005)

Before HULL, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Tony O’Neal Lloyd appeals his sentence of 120 months of imprisonment
2

based on his conviction for possession of a firearm as a felon. 18 U.S.C. §

922(g)(1). Lloyd argues that because he committed his crime after Blakely v.

Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), but before United States v.

Booker, 543 U.S. —, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), the district court violated his rights

under the ex post facto principle of fair warning in the Due Process Clause when it

enhanced his sentence based on post-verdict findings of fact and retroactively

applied the sentencing guidelines as advisory. Because, as Lloyd concedes, we

have rejected this argument, United States v. Duncan, 400 F.3d 1297 (11th Cir.

2005), and “only the Supreme Court or this Court sitting en banc can judicially

overrule a prior panel decision,” United States v. Marte, 356 F.3d 1336, 1344 (11th

Cir. 2004), we affirm.

AFFIRMED.
News United States Air Force
 Fueling future trainingPublished Feb. 7, 2015
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Sergio A. Gamboa
                        
                        
                        325th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                Tyndall Air Force Base is home to the world's largest F-22 Raptor fleet, and the only base that trains their pilots; but without the aircraft's maintainers, this impressive force could never take off from the ramp.To help ensure that the aircraft stays mission ready, Tyndall AFB has acquired a one-of-a-kind fuels system trainer (FST), making Tyndall the only base where Airmen can go to complete the fuels and On Board Inert Gas Generating System (OBIGGS) training."The system provides an overview of the Raptor's fuel system and the OBIGGS, which is used to pressurize the aircraft and provide fire suppression," said Tech. Sgt. James Harper, the 372nd Training Support Squadron Detachment 4 F-22 Raptor fuels system instructor. "It is valuable to Tyndall (AFB) and Airmen, especially for the newer ones who do not have any aircraft experience."Airmen now have an opportunity to see how the system works on a life-size replica of the Raptor's fueling system during the course."This course is helpful because you get a more in-depth view of your job," said Senior Airman Ryan Pickard, a 325th Maintenance Squadron fuels system journeyman."This course gives you the knowledge of the components that otherwise you would have to dig into theory on your own for," Pickard said. "With this replica, new Airmen that are just now jumping on the jet will get a stress free environment to learn how to remove and install parts taking that to the flightline to make minimal mistakes."According to Harper, with this course, Airmen will develop a better understanding of what is around them. Whether it is checking the fuel system, when engines are running or when pilots are preparing to take off."Airmen can better understand the problems if they are out responding to a 'red ball,' an immediate problem with the aircraft, when talking to a pilot," Harper said. "They will know they are not just getting a code telling them something is wrong. They will actually understand why it is wrong."Since Tyndall AFB has the service's only F-22 FST, Airmen from Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia; Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska; and Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, come to train on the system."Overall, hopefully this course puts out a better working class of maintainers for aircraft fuels to benefit the flight line and pilot safety," Harper said.Raptor 



Tyndall AFB 



ACC 



refuel 



maintainer 



F-22
News United States Air Force
 F-15s reinforce defense capability at Arctic Fighter MeetPublished June 1, 2016
                        
                        By Senior Airman Erin Babis
                        
                        
                        USAFE-AFAFRICA Public Affairs
                **BODØ MAIN AIR STATION, Norway (AFNS) --**
                The 48th Fighter Wing trained alongside the Norwegian, Swedish and Finnish air forces from May 23-27 during exercise Arctic Fighter Meet 2016.Seven jets from the 492nd and 493rd Fighter Squadrons were brought to Norway to conduct basic fighter maneuvers with dissimilar aircraft to improve combined air operations."Back home we are training against like aircraft, other F-15s," explained Maj. Nick Norgaard, the Arctic Fighter Meet 2016 project officer. "The opportunity that is unique here is that we get to train with F-18s, F-16s and Gripens. That allows us to get a different perspective on how other aircraft maneuver because when we go to war, we don't expect to fight other F-15s."This training exercise allowed forward-based U.S. Airmen and aircraft from Royal Air Force Lakenheath, England, to train with NATO allies and European partners, building on skill sets and improving every nation's ability to seamlessly work together."There are always challenges, that's why we do training like this," said Royal Norwegian Air Force Col. Baard Reidar Solheim, the Bodø Main Air Station commander. "We are getting better every time. To have different types of jets work together from different nations, there will always be different things to think about and different ways of doing things."Training regularly with other nations improves the U.S. Air Force's interoperability with fellow air forces and increases all NATO allies’ and partner nations' overall ability to respond to crises together.Norway 



Sweden 



USAFE 



exercise 



joint 



RAF Lakenheath
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Sontra Medical Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sean F. Moran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/S/    SEAN F.
MORAN   
|Sean F. Moran          
|Chief Financial Officer



February 16, 2005