S7248 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— SENATE May 23, 1995 

of S. 230, a bill to prohibit United 

States assistance to countries that prohibit or restrict the transport or delivery of United States humanitarian assistance. 

S. 256

At the request of Mr. DOLE, the name 

of the Senator from Montana [Mr. 

BURNS] was added as a cosponsor of S. 

256, a bill to amend title 10, United 

States Code, to establish procedures for 

determining the status of certain missing members of the Armed Forces and 

certain civilians, and for other purposes. 

S. 456

At the request of Mr. BRADLEY, the 

name of the Senator from Florida [Mr. 

GRAHAM] was added as a cosponsor of S. 

456, a bill to improve and strengthen 

the child support collection system, 

and for other purposes. 

S. 630

At the request of Mr. D’AMATO, the 

name of the Senator from North Carolina [Mr. HELMS] was added as a cosponsor of S. 630, a bill to impose comprehensive economic sanctions against 

Iran. 

S. 647

At the request of Mr. LOTT, the name 

of the Senator from Texas [Mrs. 

HUTCHISON] was added as a cosponsor of 

S. 647, a bill to amend section 6 of the 

Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 to require 

phasing-in of certain amendments of or 

revisions to land and resource management plans, and for other purposes. 

S. 770

At the request of Mr. DOLE, the 

names of the Senator from Illinois [Ms. 

MOSELEY-BRAUN], and the Senator from 

Missouri [Mr. ASHCROFT] were added as 

cosponsors of S. 770, a bill to provide 

for the relocation of the United States 

Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, and 

for other purposes. 

S. 798

At the request of Mr. CONRAD, the 

name of the Senator from North Dakota [Mr. DORGAN] was added as a cosponsor of S. 798, a bill to amend title 

XVI of the Social Security Act to improve the provision of supplemental security income benefits, and for other 

purposes. 

S. 833

At the request of Mr. HATCH, the 

name of the Senator from Connecticut 

[Mr. LIEBERMAN] was added as a cosponsor of S. 833, a bill to amend the 

Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to more 

accurately codify the depreciable life 

of semiconductor manufacturing equipment. 

SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION 34

At the request of Mr. SMITH, the 

name of the Senator from New York 

[Mr. D’AMATO] was added as a cosponsor of Senate Joint Resolution 34, a 

joint resolution prohibiting funds for 

diplomatic relations and most favored 

nation trading status with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam unless the 

President certifies to Congress that Vietnamese officials are being fully cooperative and forthcoming with efforts to 

account for the 2,205 Americans still 

missing and otherwise unaccounted for 

from the Vietnam War, as determined 

on the basis of all information available to the United States Government, 

and for other purposes. 

f 

AMENDMENTS SUBMITTED 

THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

BRADLEY (AND OTHERS) 

AMENDMENT NO. 1122 

Mr. BRADLEY (for himself, Mr. 

BREAUX, Mrs. MURRAY, Ms. MOSELEYBRAUN, Mr. GLENN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. 

KENNEDY, and Mr. LIEBERMAN) proposed 

an amendment to the concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 13) setting forth 

the congressional budget for the U.S. 

Government for the fiscal years 1996, 

1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002; as 

follows: 

On page 74, strike lines 12 through 24 and 

insert the following: ‘‘budget, the appropriate budgetary allocations, aggregates, and 

levels shall be revised to reflect 

$16,900,000,000 in budget authority and outlays of the additional deficit reduction 

achieved as calculated under subsection (c) 

for legislation that restores the full current 

law earned income tax credit under section 

32 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 

‘‘(b) REVISED ALLOCATIONS AND AGGREGATES.—Upon the reporting of legislation 

pursuant to subsection (a), and again upon 

the submission of a conference report on 

such legislation (if a conference report is 

submitted), the Chair of the Committee on 

the Budget of the Senate may submit to the 

Senate appropriately revised allocations 

under sections 302(a) and 602(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, budgetary aggregates, and levels under this resolution, revised by an amount that does not exceed the 

additional deficit reduction specified under 

subsection (d).’’. 

GRAMM (AND OTHERS) 

AMENDMENT NO. 1123 

Mr. GRAMM (for himself, Mr. COATS, 

Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. HELMS, Mr. 

KEMPTHORNE, Mr. KYL, Mr. LOTT, Mr. 

MACK, Mr. MCCAIN, and Mr. SMITH) proposed an amendment to the concurrent 

resolution (S. Con. Res. 13), supra; as 

follows: 

Strike all after the word ‘‘Section’’ on 

page 1, line 3 through page 79, line 15 and insert in lieu thereof the following: 

1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET 

FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996. 

(a) DECLARATION.—The Congress determines and declares that this resolution is 

the concurrent resolution on the budget for 

fiscal year 1996, including the appropriate 

budgetary levels for fiscal years 1997, 1998, 

1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002, as required by section 301 of the Congressional Budget Act of 

1974. 

(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for this concurrent resolution is as follows: 

Sec. 1. Concurrent resolution on the budget 

for fiscal year 1996. 

TITLE I—LEVELS AND AMOUNTS 

Sec. 2. Recommended levels and amounts. 

Sec. 3. Debt increase. 

Sec. 4. Social Security. 

Sec. 5. Major functional categories. 

Sec. 6. Reconciliation. 

TITLE II—BUDGETARY RESTRAINTS AND 

RULEMAKING 

Sec. 201. Discretionary spending limits. 

Sec. 202. Extension of pay-as-you-go point of 

order. 

Sec. 203. Tax reserve fund in the Senate. 

Sec. 204. Scoring of emergency legislation. 

Sec. 205. Budget surplus allowance. 

Sec. 206. Sale of Government assets. 

Sec. 207. Credit reform and guaranteed student loans. 

Sec. 208. Extension of Budget Act 60-vote enforcement through 2002. 

Sec. 209. Repeal of IRS allowance. 

Sec. 210. Exercise of rulemaking powers. 

TITLE III—SENSE OF THE CONGRESS 

AND THE SENATE 

Sec. 301. Restructuring Government and 

program terminations. 

Sec. 302. Sense of the Senate regarding returning programs to the States. 

Sec. 303. Commercialization of Federal activities. 

Sec. 304. Nonpartisan Advisory Commission 

on the CPI. 

Sec. 305. Sense of the Congress on a uniform 

accounting system in the Federal Government. 

TITLE I—LEVELS AND AMOUNTS 

SEC. 2. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS. 

The following budgetary levels are appropriate for the fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, 

1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002: 

(1) FEDERAL REVENUES.—(A) For purposes 

of the enforcement of this resolution—

(i) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are as follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $1,051,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: $1,063,800,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: $1,112,800,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: $1,165,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: $1,220,500,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: $1,285,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: $1,353,900,000,000. 

(ii) The amounts by which the aggregate 

levels of Federal revenues should be increased are as follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $8,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: ¥$19,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: ¥$22,200,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: ¥$21,800,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: ¥$25,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: ¥$28,500,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: ¥$31,100,000,000. 

(iii) The amounts for Federal Insurance 

Contributions Act revenues for hospital insurance within the recommended levels of 

Federal revenues are as follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $103,800,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: $109,000,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: $114,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: $120,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: $126,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: $133,600,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: $140,400,000,000. 

(B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act (excluding the receipts and 

disbursements of the Hospital Insurance 

Trust Fund)—

(i) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are as follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $947,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: $918,800,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: $997,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: $1,045,000,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: $1,093,600,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: $1,152,100,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: $1,213,500,000,000. 

(ii) The amounts by which the aggregate 

levels of Federal revenues should be changed 

as follows: 

mmaher on MIKETEMP with SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS

May 23, 1995 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— SENATE S7249 

Fiscal year 1996: $8,705,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: ¥$19,701,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: ¥$22,193,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: ¥$21,798,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: ¥$25,699,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: ¥$28,489,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: ¥$31,106,000,000. 

(2) NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY.—(A) For purposes of comparison with the maximum deficit amount under sections 601(a)(1) and 606 

of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and 

for purposes of the enforcement of this resolution, the appropriate levels of total new 

budget authority are as follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $1,266,800,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: $1,274,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: $1,321,600,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: $1,361,400,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: $1,419,600,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: $1,438,500,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: $1,483,200,000,000. 

(B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act (excluding the receipts and 

disbursements of the Hospital Insurance 

Trust Fund), the appropriate levels of total 

new budget authority are as follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $1,169,500,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: $1,174,400,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: $1,215,200,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: $1,248,100,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: $1,299,200,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: $1,291,000,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: $1,343,000,000,000. 

(3) BUDGET OUTLAYS.—(A) For purposes of 

comparison with the maximum deficit 

amount under sections 601(a)(1) and 606 of 

the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and for 

purposes of the enforcement of this resolution, the appropriate levels of total budget 

outlays are as follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $1,273,300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: $1,274,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: $1,300,100,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: $1,345,200,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: $1,399,400,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: $1,420,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: $1,467,100,000,000. 

(B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act (excluding the receipts and 

disbursements of the Hospital Insurance 

Trust Fund), the appropriate levels of total 

budget outlays are as follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $1,177,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: $1,175,400,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: $1,194,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: $1,233,600,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: $1,280,000,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: $1,292,400,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: $1,328,100,000,000. 

(4) DEFICITS.—(A) For purposes of comparison with the maximum deficit amount under 

sections 601(a)(1) and 606 of the Congressional 

Budget Act of 1974 and for purposes of the enforcement of this resolution, the amounts of 

the deficits are as follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $221,600,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: $211,100,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: $187,300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: $179,500,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: $178,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: $135,200,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: $113,200,000,000. 

(B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act (excluding the receipts and 

disbursements of the Hospital Insurance 

Trust Fund), the amounts of the deficits are 

as follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $229,800,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: $220,600,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: $196,800,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: $188,600,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: $186,400,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: $140,300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: $114,600,000,000. 

(5) PUBLIC DEBT.—The appropriate levels of 

the public debt are as follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $5,190,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: $5,471,400,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: $5,726,800,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: $5,972,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: $6,215,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: $6,416,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: $6,594,300,000,000. 

(6) DIRECT LOAN OBLIGATIONS.—The appropriate levels of total new direct loan obligations are as follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $37,600,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: $40,200,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: $42,300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: $45,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: $45,800,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: $45,800,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: $46,100,000,000. 

(7) PRIMARY LOAN GUARANTEE COMMITMENTS.—The appropriate levels of new primary loan guarantee commitments are as 

follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $193,400,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: $187,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: $185,300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: $185,300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: $184,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: $186,100,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: $187,600,000,000. 

SEC. 3. DEBT INCREASE. 

The amounts of the increase in the public 

debt subject to limitation are as follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $287,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: $280,500,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: $255,400,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: $245,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: $243,000,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: $201,200,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: $177,400,000,000. 

SEC. 4. SOCIAL SECURITY. 

(a) SOCIAL SECURITY REVENUES.—For purposes of Senate enforcement under sections 

302 and 311 of the Congressional Budget Act 

of 1974, the amounts of revenues of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust 

Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance 

Trust Fund are as follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $347,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: $392,000,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: $411,400,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: $430,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: $452,000,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: $475,200,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: $498,600,000,000. 

(b) SOCIAL SECURITY OUTLAYS.—For purposes of Senate enforcement under sections 

302 and 311 of the Congressional Budget Act 

of 1974, the amounts of outlays of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust 

Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance 

Trust Fund are as follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $299,400,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: $310,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: $324,600,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: $338,500,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: $353,100,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: $368,100,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: $383,800,000,000. 

SEC. 5. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES. 

The Congress determines and declares that 

the appropriate levels of new budget authority, budget outlays, new direct loan obligations, and new primary loan guarantee commitments for fiscal years 1996 through 2000 

for each major functional category are: 

(1) National Defense (050): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $257,700,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $261,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $253,400,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $257,000,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $259,600,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $254,500,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $266,200,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $259,600,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $276,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $267,800,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $275,900,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $267,700,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $275,900,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $269,200,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,700,000,000. 

(2) International Affairs (150): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $15,400,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $16,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$5,700,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $18,300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $14,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $15,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$5,700,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $18,300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $13,500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $14,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$5,700,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $18,300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $12,600,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $13,500,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$5,700,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $18,300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $14,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $13,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$5,700,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $18,300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $14,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $13,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$5,700,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $18,300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $14,200,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $13,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$5,700,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $18,300,000,000. 

(3) General Science, Space, and Technology 

(250): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $16,700,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $16,700,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $16,300,000,000. 

mmaher on MIKETEMP with SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS

S7250 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— SENATE May 23, 1995 

(B) Outlays, $16,600,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $16,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $16,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $16,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $16,000,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

(4) Energy (270): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $2,900,000,000 

(B) Outlays, $2,700,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $1,700,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $1,000,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $3,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $2,600,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $4,200,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $3,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $4,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $2,800,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $4,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $2,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $4,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $2,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

(5) Natural Resources and Environment 

(300): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $19,500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $20,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$100,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $18,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $20,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$100,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $15,600,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $17,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$100,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $16,800,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $18,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$100,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $16,400,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $17,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$100,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $15,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$100,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $16,600,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$100,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

(6) Agriculture (350): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $13,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $11,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$11,500,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $12,200,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $10,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$11,500,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $11,800,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $10,600,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$10,900,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $11,700,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $10,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$11,600,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $11,700,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $10,600,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$11,400,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $10,500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $9,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$11,100,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $10,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $9,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$10,900,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $5,700,000,000. 

(7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $2,500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$7,000,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,400,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $123,100,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $1,500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$5,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,400,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $123,100,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $600,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$7,000,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,400,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $123,100,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$5,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,400,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $123,100,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $1,700,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$2,500,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,400,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $123,100,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$3,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,400,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $123,100,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $200,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$3,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,400,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $123,100,000,000. 

(8) Transportation (400): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $36,500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $38,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $38,800,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $32,800,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $39,400,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $31,800,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $40,200,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $31,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

mmaher on MIKETEMP with SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS

May 23, 1995 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— SENATE S7251 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $41,200,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $31,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $41,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $31,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $40,800,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $31,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

(9) Community and Regional Development 

(450): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $5,800,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $9,800,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$2,700,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $5,400,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $7,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$2,700,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $5,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $5,600,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$2,700,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $5,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $5,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$2,700,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $5,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $5,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$2,700,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $4,500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $5,000,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$2,700,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $4,400,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $5,000,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$2,700,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,200,000,000. 

(10) Education, Training, Employment, and 

Social Services (500): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $48,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $51,700,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$13,600,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $16,300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $47,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $47,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$16,300,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $15,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $47,200,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $47,000,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$19,100,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $15,200,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $47,400,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $46,800,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$21,800,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $14,300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $47,800,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $47,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$21,900,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $15,000,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $47,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $46,800,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$22,000,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $15,800,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $47,400,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $46,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$22,200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $16,600,000,000. 

(11) Health (550): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $118,800,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $119,500,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $124,500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $124,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $128,800,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $128,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $132,600,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $132,500,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $136,500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $136,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $140,400,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $140,200,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $144,600,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $144,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $300,000,000. 

(12) Medicare (570): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $171,900,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $169,500,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $180,500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $178,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $193,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $191,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $207,400,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $204,800,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $221,400,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $219,500,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $238,900,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $236,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $258,900,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $256,700,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

(13) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act, Federal Supplementary 

Medical Insurance Trust Fund: 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $61,200,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $60,500,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $66,500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $65,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $73,700,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $73,000,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $81,900,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $81,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $90,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $89,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $100,400,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $99,500,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $112,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $111,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

(14) Income Security (600): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $226,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $225,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,000,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $233,700,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $235,600,000,000. 

mmaher on MIKETEMP with SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS

S7252 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— SENATE May 23, 1995 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,000,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $253,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $246,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,000,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $256,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $257,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,000,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $272,600,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $272,600,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,000,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $277,500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $277,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,000,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $291,900,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $291,700,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $1,000,000,000. 

(15) Social Security (650): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $5,900,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $8,500,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $8,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $10,500,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $8,800,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $11,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $9,600,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $12,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $10,500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $12,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $11,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $13,500,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $11,700,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $14,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

(16) Veterans Benefits and Services (700): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $37,400,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $36,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $26,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $37,500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $37,700,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,100,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $21,600,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $37,600,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $38,000,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,000,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $19,700,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $37,900,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $38,200,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,000,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $18,600,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $37,900,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $39,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,200,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $19,300,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $38,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $40,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,400,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $19,900,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $38,700,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $40,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, 

$1,700,000,000. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $20,600,000,000. 

(17) Administration of Justice (750): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $20,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $19,600,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $20,700,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $21,200,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $21,400,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $22,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $22,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $23,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $22,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $23,700,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $21,900,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $23,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $21,800,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $23,200,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

(18) General Government (800): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $12,500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $13,000,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $12,400,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $12,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $12,200,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $12,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $12,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $12,000,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $12,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $11,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $11,600,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $11,700,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $11,600,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $11,600,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

(19) Net Interest (900): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $297,500,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $297,500,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $308,200,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $308,200,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $316,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $316,000,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $327,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $327,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $338,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $338,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $345,200,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $345,200,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $353,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $353,000,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

(20) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act, Net Interest (900): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, $308,400,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $308,400,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

mmaher on MIKETEMP with SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS

May 23, 1995 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— SENATE S7253 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, $319,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $319,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, $326,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $326,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, $336,600,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $336,600,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, $346,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $346,000,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, $350,900,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $350,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, $356,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, $356,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

(21) The corresponding levels of gross interest on the public debt are as follows: 

Fiscal year 1996: $369,198,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1997: $379,464,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1998: $387,544,000,000. 

Fiscal year 1999: $399,682,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2000: $411,144,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2001: $421,368,000,000. 

Fiscal year 2002: $430,460,000,000. 

(22) Allowances (920): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$8,600,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$6,500,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$26,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$23,500,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$25,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$23,600,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$26,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$24,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$26,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$24,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$34,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$31,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$35,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$32,200,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

(23) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$33,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$33,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$33,800,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$33,800,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$36,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$36,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$37,700,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$37,700,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$39,700,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$39,700,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$41,100,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$41,100,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$42,300,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$42,300,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

(24) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act, Undistributed Offsetting 

Receipts (950): 

Fiscal year 1996: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$30,600,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$30,600,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1997: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$31,200,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$31,200,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1998: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$33,600,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$33,600,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 1999: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$34,900,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$34,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2000: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$36,700,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$36,700,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2001: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$37,900,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$37,900,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

Fiscal year 2002: 

(A) New budget authority, ¥$39,000,000,000. 

(B) Outlays, ¥$39,000,000,000. 

(C) New direct loan obligations, $0. 

(D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0. 

SEC. 6. RECONCILIATION. 

(a) SENATE COMMITTEES.—Not later than 

July 14, 1995, the committees named in this 

subsection shall submit their recommendations to the Committee on the Budget of the 

Senate. After receiving those recommendations, the Committee on the Budget shall report to the Senate a reconciliation bill carrying out all such recommendations without 

any substantive revision. 

(1) COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, NUTRITION, 

AND FORESTRY.—The Senate Committee on 

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry shall 

report changes in laws within its jurisdiction 

that provide direct spending (as defined in 

section 250(c)(8) of the Balanced Budget and 

Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985) to reduce outlays $2,490,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, 

$27,973,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 

1996 through 2000, and $45,804,000,000 for the 

period of fiscal years 1996 through 2002. 

(2) COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES.—The 

Senate Committee on Armed Services shall 

report changes in laws within its jurisdiction 

that provide direct spending to reduce outlays $21,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, $338,000,000 

for the period of fiscal years 1996 through 

2000, and $649,000,000 for the period of fiscal 

years 1996 through 2002. 

(3) COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND

URBAN AFFAIRS.—The Senate Committee on 

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs shall 

report changes in laws within its jurisdiction 

to reduce the deficit $373,000,000 in fiscal year 

1996, $5,742,000,000 for the period of fiscal 

years 1996 through 2000, and $6,690,000,000 for 

the period of fiscal years 1996 through 2002. 

(4) COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND

TRANSPORTATION.—The Senate Committee on 

Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction to reduce the deficit $2,464,000,000 in 

fiscal year 1996, $21,937,000,000 for the period 

of fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and 

$33,685,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 

1996 through 2002. 

(5) COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES.—The Senate Committee on Energy 

and Natural Resources shall report changes 

in laws within its jurisdiction that provide 

direct spending to reduce outlays 

$1,771,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, $4,775,000,000 

for the period of fiscal years 1996 through 

2000, and $5,001,000,000 for the period of fiscal 

years 1996 through 2002. 

(6) COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC

WORKS.—The Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works shall report changes 

in laws within its jurisdiction that provide 

direct spending to reduce outlays $106,000,000 

in fiscal year 1996, $1,290,000,000 for the period 

of fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and 

$2,236,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 

1996 through 2002. 

(7) COMMITTEE ON FINANCE.—The Senate 

Committee on Finance shall report changes 

in laws within its jurisdiction that provide 

direct spending to reduce outlays 

$22,757,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, 

$294,260,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 

1996 through 2000, and $544,302,000,000 for the 

period of fiscal years 1996 through 2002. 

(8) COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS.—The 

Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending to reduce outlays $0 in fiscal year 1996, $0 for the 

period of fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and 

$0 for the period of fiscal years 1996 through 

2002. 

(9) COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS.—The Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs shall report changes in laws 

within its jurisdiction that provide direct 

spending to reduce outlays $118,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, $3,023,000,000 for the period of 

mmaher on MIKETEMP with SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS

S7254 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— SENATE May 23, 1995 

fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and 

$6,871,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 

1996 through 2002. 

(10) COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY.—The 

Senate Committee on the Judiciary shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction 

that provide direct spending to reduce outlays $119,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, 

$923,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996 

through 2000, and $1,483,000,000 for the period 

of fiscal years 1996 through 2002. 

(11) COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND HUMAN RESOURCES.—The Senate Committee on Labor 

and Human Resources shall report changes 

in laws within its jurisdiction that provide 

direct spending to reduce outlays 

$1,141,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, $9,165,000,000 

for the period of fiscal years 1996 through 

2000, and $13,795,000,000 for the period of fiscal 

years 1996 through 2002. 

(12) COMMITTEE ON RULES AND ADMINISTRATION.—The Senate Committee on Rules and 

Administration shall report changes in laws 

within its jurisdiction that provide direct 

spending to reduce outlays $2,000,000 in fiscal 

year 1996, $280,000,000 for the period of fiscal 

years 1996 through 2000, and $319,000,000 for 

the period of fiscal years 1996 through 2002. 

(13) COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS.—

The Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending to reduce outlays $301,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, 

$5,760,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 

1996 through 2000, and $10,002,000,000 for the 

period of fiscal years 1996 through 2002. 

TITLE II—BUDGETARY RESTRAINTS AND 

RULEMAKING 

SEC. 201. DISCRETIONARY SPENDING LIMITS. 

(a) DEFINITION.—As used in this section and 

for the purposes of allocations made pursuant to section 602(a) of the Congressional 

Budget Act of 1974, for the discretionary category, the term ‘‘discretionary spending 

limit’’ means—

(1) with respect to fiscal year 1996—

(A) for the defense category $258,379,000,000 

in new budget authority and $262,035,000,000 

in outlays; and 

(B) for the nondefense category 

$219,441,000,000 in new budget authority and 

$264,908,000,000 in outlays; 

(2) with respect to fiscal year 1997—

(A) for the defense category $254,028,000,000 

in new budget authority and $257,695,000,000 

in outlays; and 

(B) for the nondefense category 

$194,542,000,000 in new budget authority and 

$234,248,000,000 in outlays; 

(3) with respect to fiscal year 1998—

(A) for the defense category $260,321,000,000 

in new budget authority and $255,226,000,000 

in outlays; and 

(B) for the nondefense category 

$201,387,000,000 in new budget authority and 

$228,735,000,000 in outlays; 

(4) with respect to fiscal year 1999—

(A) for the defense category $266,906,000,000 

in new budget authority and $260,331,000,000 

in outlays; and 

(B) for the nondefense category 

$191,023,000,000 in new budget authority and 

$225,240,000,000 in outlays; 

(5) with respect to fiscal year 2000—

(A) for the defense category $276,644,000,000 

in new budget authority and $268,468,000,000 

in outlays; and 

(B) for the nondefense category 

$195,215,000,000 in new budget authority and 

$225,293,000,000 in outlays; 

(6) with respect to fiscal year 2001—

(A) for the defense category $276,644,000,000 

in new budget authority and $268,468,000,000 

in outlays; and 

(B) for the nondefense category 

$191,112,000,000 in new budget authority and 

$223,790,000,000 in outlays; and 

(7) with respect to fiscal year 2002—

(A) for the defense category $276,644,000,000 

in new budget authority and $270,000,000,000 

in outlays; and 

(B) for the nondefense category 

$189,259,000,000 in new budget authority and 

$222,060,000,000 in outlays; 

as adjusted for changes in concepts and definitions and emergency appropriations. 

(b) POINT OF ORDER IN THE SENATE.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in 

paragraph (2), it shall not be in order in the 

Senate to consider—

(A) any concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 

2001, or 2002 (or amendment, motion, or conference report on such a resolution) that provides discretionary spending in excess of the 

sum of the defense and nondefense discretionary spending limits for such fiscal year; 

or 

(B) any appropriations bill or resolution 

(or amendment, motion, or conference report 

on such appropriations bill or resolution) for 

fiscal year 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 

2001, or 2002 that would exceed any of the discretionary spending limits in this section or 

suballocations of those limits made pursuant 

to section 602(b) of the Congressional Budget 

Act of 1974. 

(2) EXCEPTION.—This section shall not 

apply if a declaration of war by the Congress 

is in effect or if a joint resolution pursuant 

to section 258 of the Balanced Budget and 

Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 has 

been enacted. 

(c) WAIVER.—This section may be waived 

or suspended in the Senate only by the affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. 

(d) APPEALS.—Appeals in the Senate from 

the decisions of the Chair relating to any 

provision of this section shall be limited to 1 

hour, to be equally divided between, and controlled by, the appellant and the manager of 

the concurrent resolution, bill, or joint resolution, as the case may be. An affirmative 

vote of three-fifths of the Members of the 

Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required in the Senate to sustain an appeal of 

the ruling of the Chair on a point of order 

raised under this section. 

(e) DETERMINATION OF BUDGET LEVELS.—

For purposes of this section, the levels of 

new budget authority, outlays, new entitlement authority, and revenues for a fiscal 

year shall be determined on the basis of estimates made by the Committee on the Budget 

of the Senate. 

SEC. 202. EXTENSION OF PAY-AS-YOU-GO POINT 

OF ORDER. 

(a) PURPOSE.—The Senate declares that it 

is essential to—

(1) ensure continued compliance with the 

balanced budget plan set forth in this resolution; and 

(2) continue the pay-as-you-go enforcement 

system. 

(b) POINT OF ORDER.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—It shall not be in order in 

the Senate to consider any direct-spending 

or receipts legislation (as defined in paragraph (3)) that would increase the deficit for 

any one of the three applicable time periods 

(as defined in paragraph (2)) as measured 

pursuant to paragraph (4). 

(2) APPLICABLE TIME PERIODS.—For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘‘applicable time period’’ means any one of the three 

following periods—

(A) the first fiscal year covered by the 

most recently adopted concurrent resolution 

on the budget; 

(B) the period of the first 5 fiscal years covered by the most recently adopted concurrent resolution on the budget; or 

(C) the period of the 5 fiscal years following the first 5 years covered by the most 

recently adopted concurrent resolution on 

the budget. 

(3) DIRECT-SPENDING OR RECEIPTS LEGISLATION.—For purposes of this subsection, the 

term ‘‘direct-spending or receipts legislation’’ shall—

(A) except as otherwise provided in this 

subsection, include all direct-spending legislation as that term is interpreted for purposes of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 

Deficit Control Act of 1985; 

(B) include—

(i) any bill, joint resolution, amendment, 

motion, or conference report to which this 

subsection otherwise applies; and 

(ii) the estimated amount of savings in direct-spending programs applicable to that 

fiscal year resulting from the prior year’s sequestration under the Balanced Budget and 

Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, if any 

(except for any amounts sequestered as a result of a net deficit increase in the fiscal 

year immediately preceding the prior fiscal 

year); and 

(C) exclude—

(i) any concurrent resolution on the budget; and 

(ii) full funding of, and continuation of, the 

deposit insurance guarantee commitment in 

effect on the date of enactment of the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990. 

(4) BASELINE.—Estimates prepared pursuant to this section shall—

(A) use the baseline used for the most recent concurrent resolution on the budget, 

and for years beyond those covered by that 

concurrent resolution; and 

(B) abide by the requirements of subsections (a) through (d) of section 257 of the 

Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 

Control Act of 1985, except that references to 

‘‘outyears’’ in that section shall be deemed 

to apply to any year (other than the budget 

year) covered by any one of the time periods 

defined in paragraph (2) of this subsection. 

(c) WAIVER.—This section may be waived 

or suspended in the Senate only by the affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. 

(d) APPEALS.—Appeals in the Senate from 

the decisions of the Chair relating to any 

provision of this section shall be limited to 1 

hour, to be equally divided between, and controlled by, the appellant and the manager of 

the bill or joint resolution, as the case may 

be. An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the 

Members of the Senate, duly chosen and 

sworn, shall be required in the Senate to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on 

a point of order raised under this section. 

(e) DETERMINATION OF BUDGET LEVELS.—

For purposes of this section, the levels of 

new budget authority, outlays, and receipts 

for a fiscal year shall be determined on the 

basis of estimates made by the Committee 

on the Budget of the Senate. 

(f) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 23 of 

House Concurrent Resolution 218 (103d Congress) is repealed. 

(g) SUNSET.—Subsections (a) through (e) of 

this section shall expire September 30, 2002. 

SEC. 203. BUDGET SURPLUS ALLOWANCE. 

(a) ADJUSTMENTS.—For the purposes of 

points of order under the Congressional 

Budget and Impoundment Act of 1974 and 

this concurrent resolution on the budget, the 

revenue aggregates shall be reduced and 

other appropriate budgetary aggregates and 

levels shall be revised to reflect the additional deficit reduction achieved as calculated under section (c) for legislation that 

reduces revenues. 

(b) REVISED AGGREGATES.—Upon the reporting to the Committee on the Budget of 

legislation that complies with reconciliation 

directives of section 6, and upon the reporting of the conference committee on such legislation (if a conference report is submitted), 

mmaher on MIKETEMP with SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS

May 23, 1995 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— SENATE S7255 

the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate shall submit to the Senate 

appropriately revised budgetary aggregates 

and levels by an amount that does not exceed the additional deficit reduction calculated under subsection (d). 

(c) CBO REVISED DEFICIT ESTIMATE.—Upon 

the reporting to the Committee on the Budget of legislation that complies with reconciliation directives of section 6, and upon 

the reporting of the conference committee 

on such legislation (if a conference report is 

submitted), the Congressional Budget Office 

shall provide the Chairman of the Committee on Budget of the Senate a revised estimate of the deficit for fiscal years 1996 

through 2005 that assumes enactment of such 

legislation. 

(d) ADDITIONAL DEFICIT REDUCTION.—For 

purposes of this section, the term ‘‘additional deficit reduction’’ means the amount 

by which the total deficit levels assumed in 

this resolution for a fiscal year exceed the 

revised deficit estimate provided pursuant to 

subsection (c) for such fiscal year for fiscal 

years 1996 through 2005. 

(e) CBO CERTIFICATION AND CONTINGENCIES.—This section shall not apply unless—

(1) the Director of the Congressional Budget Office has provided the estimates required 

by subsection (c); and 

(2) the revisions made pursuant to this subsection do not cause a budget deficit for fiscal year 2002, 2003, 2004, or 2005. 

SEC. 204. TAX RESERVE FUND IN THE SENATE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Upon the reporting to the 

Committee on the Budget of legislation complying with the reconciliation requirements 

of Section 6, revenue and spending aggregates shall be reduced and allocations shall 

be revised for legislation that reduces revenues within the Finance Committees jurisdiction by the following amounts: 

1996—$3,000,000,000; 

1997—$7,000,000,000; 

1998—$14,000,000,000; 

1999—$23,000,000,000; 

2000—$32,000,000,000; 

2001—$41,000,000,000; 

2002—$50,000,000,000. 

or by such amounts defined as ‘‘additional 

deficit reduction’’ in section 203(d) if less 

than the amounts specified herein, provided 

that the costs of such legislation are not included in the concurrent resolution on the 

budget and the enactment of such legislation 

will not increase the deficit in this resolution for—

(1) fiscal year 1996; 

(2) the period of fiscal years 1996 through 

2000; or 

(3) the period of fiscal years 2001 through 

2005. 

(b) REVISED ALLOCATIONS.—Upon the reporting of legislation pursuant to subsection 

(a), and again upon the submission of a conference report on such legislation (if a conference report is submitted), the Chairman of 

the Committee on the Budget of the Senate 

shall file with the Senate appropriately revised allocations under sections 302(a) and 

602(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 

and revised functional levels and aggregates 

to carry out this subsection. These revised 

allocations, functional levels, and aggregates 

shall be considered for the purposes of the 

Congressional Budget Act of 1974 as allocations, functional levels and aggregates contained in this concurrent resolution on the 

budget. 

(c) REPORTING REVISED ALLOCATIONS.—The 

appropriate committee shall report appropriately revise allocations pursuant to sections 302(b) and 602(b) of the Congressional 

Budget Act of 1974 to carry out this section. 

SEC. 205. SCORING OF EMERGENCY LEGISLATION. 

Notwithstanding section 606(d)(2) of the 

Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and beginning with fiscal year 1996, the determinations under sections 302, 303, and 311 of such 

Act shall take into account any new budget 

authority, new entitlement authority, outlays, receipts, or deficit effects as a consequence of the provisions of section 

251(b)(2)(D) and 252(e) of the Balanced Budget 

and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985. 

SEC. 206. SALE OF GOVERNMENT ASSETS. 

(a) SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.—It is the sense 

of the Congress that—

(1) the prohibition on scoring asset sales 

has discouraged the sale of assets that can be 

better managed by the private sector and 

generate receipts to reduce the Federal 

budget deficit; 

(2) the President’s fiscal year 1996 budget 

included $8,000,000,000 in receipts from asset 

sales and proposed a change in the asset sale 

scoring rule to allow the proceeds from these 

sales to be scored; 

(3) assets should not be sold if such sale 

would increase the budget deficit over the 

long run; and 

(4) the asset sale scoring prohibition 

should be repealed and consideration should 

be given to replacing it with a methodology 

that takes into account the long-term budgetary impact of asset sales. 

(b) BUDGETARY TREATMENT.—For purposes 

of any concurrent resolution on the budget 

and the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, the amounts realized from sales of assets shall be scored with 

respect to the level of budget authority, outlays, or revenues. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘sale of an asset’’ shall have 

the same meaning as under section 250(c)(21) 

of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985. 

(d) TREATMENT OF LOAN ASSETS.—For the 

purposes of this section, the sale of loan assets or the prepayment of a loan shall be 

governed by the terms of the Federal Credit 

Reform Act of 1990. 

SEC. 207. CREDIT REFORM AND GUARANTEED 

STUDENT LOANS. 

For the purposes of allocations and points 

of order under the Congressional Budget Act 

of 1974 and this resolution, the cost of a direct loan shall be the net present value, at 

the time when the direct loan is disbursed, of 

the following cash flows for the estimated 

life of the loan: 

(1) Loan disbursements. 

(2) Repayments of principal. 

(3) Payments of interest and other payments by or to the Government over the life 

of the loan after adjusting for estimated defaults, prepayments, fees, penalties, and 

other recoveries. 

(4) In the case of legislation increasing direct loan commitments for a program in 

which loan commitments will equal or exceed $5,000,000,000 for the coming fiscal year 

(or for any prior fiscal year), direct expenses, 

including—

(A) activities related to credit extension, 

loan origination, loan servicing, training, 

program promotion, management of contractors, and payments to contractors, other 

government entities, and program participants; 

(B) collection of delinquent loans; and 

(C) writeoff and closeout of loans. 

SEC. 208. EXTENSION OF BUDGET ACT 60-VOTE 

ENFORCEMENT THROUGH 2002. 

Notwithstanding section 275(b) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 

Act of 1985 (as amended by sections 13112(b) 

and 13208(b)(3) of the Budget Enforcement 

Act of 1990), the second sentence of section 

904(c) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 

(except insofar as it relates to section 313 of 

that Act) and the final sentence of section 

904(d) of that Act (except insofar as it relates 

to section 313 of that Act) shall continue to 

have effect as rules of the Senate through 

(but no later than) September 30, 2002. 

SEC. 209. REPEAL OF IRS ALLOWANCE. 

Section 25 of House Concurrent Resolution 

218 (103d Congress, 2d Session) is repealed. 

SEC. 210. EXERCISE OF RULEMAKING POWERS. 

The Senate adopts the provisions of this 

title—

(1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power 

of the Senate, and as such they shall be considered as part of the rules of the Senate, 

and such rules shall supersede other rules 

only to the extent that they are inconsistent 

therewith; and 

(2) with full recognition of the constitutional right of the Senate to change those 

rules (so far as they relate to the Senate) at 

any time, in the same manner, and to the 

same extent as in the case of any other rule 

of the Senate. 

EXON (AND OTHERS) AMENDMENT 

NO. 1124 

Mr. EXON (for himself, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. KENNEDY, Mrs. 

MURRAY, Mr. BREAUX, Mr. DASCHLE, 

Mr. DODD, and Mr. BRADLEY) proposed 

an amendment to the concurrent resolution S. Con. Res. 13, supra; as follows: 

On page 74, strike beginning with line 12 

through line 12 on page 77 and insert the following: ‘‘budget, the appropriate budgetary 

allocations, aggregates, and levels shall be 

revised to reflect—

‘‘(1) $100,000,000,000 in budget authority and 

outlays of the additional deficit reduction 

achieved as calculated under subsection (c) 

for legislation that reduces the adverse effects on medicare and medicaid of—

‘‘(A) increased premiums; 

‘‘(B) increased deductibles; 

‘‘(C) increased copayments; 

‘‘(D) limits on the freedom to select the 

doctor of one’s choice; 

‘‘(E) reduced quality of health care services caused by funding reductions for health 

care providers; 

‘‘(F) reduced or eliminated benefits caused 

by restrictions on eligibility or services; 

‘‘(G) closure of hospitals or nursing homes, 

or other harms to health care providers; or 

‘‘(H) other costs to beneficiaries; 

‘‘(2) $18,000,000,000 in budget authority and 

outlays of the additional deficit reduction 

achieved as calculated under subsection (c) 

for legislation that reduces the adverse effects on discretionary spending on education 

and $12,000,000,000 in budget authority and 

outlays for legislation that reduces the adverse effects on direct spending for education; 

‘‘(3) $10,000,000,000 in budget authority and 

outlays of the additional deficit reduction 

achieved as calculated under subsection (c) 

for legislation that reduces the adverse effects on direct spending within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Agriculture; 

‘‘(4) $17,000,000,000 in budget authority and 

outlays of the additional deficit reduction 

achieved as calculated under subsection (c) 

for legislation that restores the full current 

law earned income tax credit under section 

32 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; 

‘‘(5) $3,000,000,000 in budget authority and 

outlays of the additional deficit reduction 

achieved as calculated under subsection (c) 

for legislation that reduces the adverse effects on programs for veterans; and 

‘‘(6) $10,000,000,000 in budget authority and 

outlays of the additional deficit reduction 

mmaher on MIKETEMP with SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS

S7256 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— SENATE May 23, 1995 

achieved as calculated under subsection (c) 

which shall be subject to allocation by the 

Committee on the Budget, by majority vote. 

The amounts provided by paragraphs (1) 

through (6) shall be proportionally adjusted 

based on any increase or decrease in the projected allowance of $170,000,000,000. 

‘‘(b) REVISED ALLOCATIONS AND AGGREGATES.—Upon the reporting of legislation 

pursuant to subsection (a), and again upon 

the submission of a conference report on 

such legislation (if a conference report is 

submitted), the Chair of the Committee on 

the Budget of the Senate may submit to the 

Senate appropriately revised allocations 

under sections 302(a) and 602(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, discretionary 

spending limits under section 201(a) of this 

resolution, budgetary aggregates, and levels 

under this resolution, revised by an amount 

that does not exceed the additional deficit 

reduction specified under subsection (d). 

‘‘(c) CBO REVISED DEFICIT ESTIMATE.—

After the enactment of legislation that complies with the reconciliation directives of 

section 6, the Congressional Budget Office 

shall provide the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate a revised 

estimate of the deficit for fiscal years 1996 

through 2005. 

‘‘(d) ADDITIONAL DEFICIT REDUCTION.—For 

purposes of this section, the term ‘‘additional deficit reduction’’ means the amount 

by which the total deficit levels assumed in 

this resolution for a fiscal year exceed the 

revised deficit estimate provided pursuant to 

subsection (c) for such fiscal year for fiscal 

years 1996 through 2005. 

‘‘(e) CBO CERTIFICATION AND CONTINGENCIES.—This section shall not apply unless—

‘‘(1) legislation has been enacted complying with the reconciliation directives of 

section 6; 

‘‘(2) the Director of the Congressional 

Budget Office has provided the estimate required by subsection (c); and 

‘‘(3) the revisions made pursuant to this 

subsection do not cause a budget deficit for 

fiscal year 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005. 

‘‘SEC. 205. SCORING OF EMERGENCY LEGISLATION. 

‘‘Notwithstanding section 606(d)(2) of the 

Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and beginning with fiscal year 1996, the determinations under sections 302, 303, and 311 of such 

Act shall take into account any new budget 

authority, new entitlement authority, outlays, receipts, or deficit effects as a consequence of the provisions of section 

251(b)(2)(D) and 252(e) of the Balanced Budget 

and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.’’. 

THURMOND (AND OTHERS) 

AMENDMENT NO. 1125 

Mr. THURMOND (for himself, Mr. 

MCCAIN, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. WARNER, 

Mr. COATS, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr. LOTT, Mr. SMITH, Mr. 

COHEN, Mr. SANTORUM, and Mr. STEVENS) proposed an amendment to the 

concurrent resolution S. Con. Res. 13, 

supra; as follows: 

On page 11, line 7, increase the amount by 

$9,600,000,000. 

On page 11, line 8, increase the amount by 

$4,000,000,000. 

On page 11, line 14, increase the amount by 

$15,900,000,000. 

On page 11, line 15, increase the amount by 

$8,300,000,000. 

On page 11, line 21, increase the amount by 

$17,700,000,000. 

On page 11, line 22, increase the amount by 

$10,800,000,000. 

On page 12, line 3, increase the amount by 

$15,100,000,000. 

On page 12, line 4, increase the amount by 

$11,700,000,000. 

On page 12, line 10, increase the amount by 

$11,300,000,000. 

On page 12, line 11, increase the amount by 

$11,500,000,000. 

On page 12, line 17, increase the amount by 

$11,400,000,000. 

On page 12, line 18, increase the amount by 

$11,600,000,000. 

On page 12, line 24, increase the amount by 

$11,300,000,000. 

On page 12, line 25, increase the amount by 

$10,000,000,000. 

On page 54, line 20, decrease the amount by 

$9,600,000,000. 

On page 54, line 21, decrease the amount by 

$4,000,000,000. 

On page 55, line 2, decrease the amount by 

$15,900,000,000. 

On page 55, line 3, decrease the amount by 

$8,300,000,000. 

On page 55, line 9, decrease the amount by 

$17,700,000,000. 

On page 55, line 10, decrease the amount by 

$10,800,000,000. 

On page 55, line 16, decrease the amount by 

$15,100,000,000. 

On page 55, line 17, decrease the amount by 

$11,700,000,000. 

On page 55, line 23, decrease the amount by 

$11,300,000,000. 

On page 55, line 24, decrease the amount by 

$11,500,000,000. 

On page 56, line 5, decrease the amount by 

$11,400,000,000. 

On page 56, line 6, decrease the amount by 

$11,600,000,000. 

On page 56, line 12, decrease the amount by 

$11,300,000,000. 

On page 56, line 13, decrease the amount by 

$10,000,000,000. 

On page 65, line 14, increase the amount by 

$9,600,000,000. 

On page 65, line 15, increase the amount by 

$4,000,000,000. 

On page 65, line 17, decrease the amount by 

$9,600,000,000. 

On page 65, line 18, decrease the amount by 

$4,000,000,000. 

On page 65, line 21, increase the amount by 

$15,900,000,000. 

On page 65, line 22, increase the amount by 

$8,300,000,000. 

On page 65, line 24, decrease the amount by 

$15,900,000,000. 

On page 65, line 25, decrease the amount by 

$8,300,000,000. 

On page 66, line 3, increase the amount by 

$17,700,000,000. 

On page 66, line 4, increase the amount by 

$10,800,000,000. 

On page 66, line 6, decrease the amount by 

$17,700,000,000. 

On page 66, line 7, decrease the amount by 

$10,800,000,000. 

On page 66, line 10, increase the amount by 

$15,100,000,000. 

On page 66, line 11, increase the amount by 

$11,700,000,000. 

On page 66, line 13, decrease the amount by 

$15,100,000,000. 

On page 66, line 14, decrease the amount by 

$11,700,000,000. 

On page 66, line 17, increase the amount by 

$11,300,000,000. 

On page 66, line 18, increase the amount by 

$11,500,000,000. 

On page 66, line 20, decrease the amount by 

$11,300,000,000. 

On page 66, line 21, decrease the amount by 

$11,500,000,000. 

On page 66, line 24, increase the amount by 

$11,400,000,000. 

On page 66, line 25, increase the amount by 

$11,600,000,000. 

On page 67, line , decrease the amount by 

$11,400,000,000. 

On page 67, line , decrease the amount by 

$11,600,000,000. 

On page 67, line 6, increase the amount by 

$11,300,000,000. 

On page 67, line 7, increase the amount by 

$10,000,000,000. 

On page 67, line 9, decrease the amount by 

$11,300,000,000. 

On page 67, line 10, decrease the amount by 

$10,000,000,000. 

On page 68, after line 12, add the following 

new paragraph: 

(3) It is the sense of the Senate that the 

Senate should waive all points of order that 

would preclude increasing non-defense spending in any one fiscal year by up to $2 billion 

and, at the same time, decreasing defense 

spending in any one fiscal year by up to $2 

billion, from the levels of discretionary 

spending in this section. It is further the 

sense of the Senate that defense spending 

may not be reduced by more than a total of 

$10 billion and non-defense spending may not 

be increased by more than a total of $10 billion over the seven years of the resolution, 

from the levels of discretionary spending in 

this section. 

HARKIN (AND BUMPERS) 

AMENDMENT NO. 1126 

Mr. HARKIN (for himself and Mr. 

BUMPERS) proposed an amendment to 

the concurrent resolution, Senate Concurrent Resolution 13, supra; as follows: 

On page 12, line 3, decrease the amount by 

$4,800,000,000. 

On page 12, line 4, decrease the amount by 

$1,000,000,000. 

On page 12, line 10, decrease the amount by 

$10,000,000,000. 

On page 12, line 11, decrease the amount by 

$3,400,000,000. 

On page 12, line 17, decrease the amount by 

$10,000,000,000. 

On page 12, line 18, decrease the amount by 

$6,200,000,000. 

On page 12, line 24, decrease the amount by 

$10,000,000,000. 

On page 12, line 25, decrease the amount by 

$6,200,000,000. 

On page 32, line 11, increase the amount by 

$4,800,000,000. 

On page 32, line 12, increase the amount by 

$1,000,000,000. 

On page 32, line 19, increase the amount by 

$10,000,000,000. 

On page 32, line 20, increase the amount by 

$3,400,000,000. 

On page 33, line 2, increase the amount by 

$10,000,000,000. 

On page 33, line 3, increase the amount by 

$6,200,000,000. 

On page 33, line 10, increase the amount by 

$10,000,000,000. 

On page 33, line 11, increase the amount by 

$6,200,000,000. 

On page 66, line 10, decrease the amount by 

$4,800,000,000. 

On page 66, line 11, decrease the amount by 

$1,000,000,000. 

On page 66, line 13, increase the amount by 

$4,800,000,000. 

On page 66, line 14, increase the amount by 

$1,000,000,000. 

On page 66, line 17, decrease the amount by 

$10,000,000,000. 

On page 66, line 18, decrease the amount by 

$3,400,000,000. 

On page 66, line 20, increase the amount by 

$10,000,000,000. 

On page 66, line 21, increase the amount by 

$3,400,000,000. 

On page 66, line 24, decrease the amount by 

$10,000,000,000. 

mmaher on MIKETEMP with SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS

May 23, 1995 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— SENATE S7257 

On page 66, line 25, decrease the amount by 

$6,200,000,000. 

On page 67, line 2, increase the amount by 

$10,000,000,000. 

On page 67, line 3, increase the amount by 

$6,200,000,000. 

On page 67, line 6, decrease the amount by 

$10,000,000,000. 

On page 67, line 7, decrease the amount by 

$6,200,000,000. 

On page 67, line 9, increase the amount by 

$10,000,000,000. 

On page 67, line 10, increase the amount by 

$6,200,000,000. 

FEINGOLD (AND OTHERS) 

AMENDMENT NO. 1127 

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself, Mr. 

HOLLINGS, Mr. BYRD, Mr. NUNN, Mr. 

BUMPERS, Mr. KERREY, Mr. ROBB, Mr. 

DORGAN, Mr. SIMON, Mrs. MURRAY, and 

Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN) proposed an 

amendment to the concurrent resolution, Senate Concurrent Resolution 13, 

supra; as follows: 

On page 74, strike beginning with line 8 

through page 75, line 22. 

SNOWE (AND OTHERS) 

AMENDMENT NO. 1128 

Ms. SNOWE (for herself, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. BROWN, Mrs. 

KASSEBAUM, Mr. COHEN, Mr. LOTT, Mr. 

CHAFEE, and Mr. SIMPSON) proposed an 

amendment to the concurrent resolution, Senate Concurrent Resolution 13, 

supra; as follows: 

On page 26, decrease the amount on line 20 

by $200,000,000. 

On page 26, decrease the amount on line 21 

by $100,000,000. 

On page 27, decrease the amount on line 3 

by $200,000,000. 

On page 27, decrease the amount on line 4 

by $300,000,000. 

On page 27, decrease the amount on line 11 

by $200,000,000. 

On page 27, decrease the amount on line 12 

by $300,000,000. 

On page 27, decrease the amount on line 19 

by $200,000,000. 

On page 27, decrease the amount on line 20 

by $300,000,000. 

On page 28, decrease the amount on line 2 

by $200,000,000. 

On page 28, decrease the amount on line 3 

by $300,000,000. 

On page 28, decrease the amount on line 10 

by $200,000,000. 

On page 28, decrease the amount on line 11 

by $300,000,000. 

On page 28, decrease the amount on line 18 

by $200,000,000. 

On page 28, decrease the amount on line 19 

by $300,000,000. 

On page 31, increase the amount on line 12 

by $900,000,000. 

On page 31, increase the amount on line 13 

by $500,000,000. 

On page 31, increase the amount on line 20 

by $1,000,000,000. 

On page 31, increase the amount on line 21 

by $800,000,000. 

On page 32, increase the amount on line 3 

by $1,000,000,000. 

On page 32, increase the amount on line 4 

by $900,000,000. 

On page 32, increase the amount on line 11 

by $1,000,000,000. 

On page 32, increase the amount on line 12 

by $1,000,000,000. 

On page 32, increase the amount on line 19 

by $1,000,000,000. 

On page 32, increase the amount on line 20 

by $1,100,000,000. 

On page 33, increase the amount on line 2 

by $1,000,000,000. 

On page 33, increase the amount on line 3 

by $1,100,000,000. 

On page 33, increase the amount on line 10 

by $1,000,000,000. 

On page 33, increase the amount on line 11 

by $1,100,000,000. 

On page 48, decrease the amount on line 10 

by $300,000,000. 

On page 48, decrease the amount on line 17 

by $300,000,000. 

On page 48, decrease the amount on line 24 

by $300,000,000. 

On page 48, decrease the amount on line 25 

by $100,000,000. 

On page 49, decrease the amount on line 6 

by $300,000,000. 

On page 49, decrease the amount on line 7 

by $200,000,000. 

On page 49, decrease the amount on line 13 

by $300,000,000. 

On page 49, decrease the amount on line 14 

by $300,000,000. 

On page 49, decrease the amount on line 20 

by $300,000,000. 

On page 49, decrease the amount on line 21 

by $300,000,000. 

On page 50, decrease the amount on line 2 

by $300,000,000. 

On page 50, decrease the amount on line 3 

by $300,000,000. 

On page 54, decrease the amount on line 20 

by $400,000,000. 

On page 54, decrease the amount on line 21 

by $400,000,000. 

On page 55, decrease the amount on line 2 

by $500,000,000. 

On page 55, decrease the amount on line 3 

by $500,000,000. 

On page 55, decrease the amount on line 9 

by $500,000,000. 

On page 55, decrease the amount on line 10 

by $500,000,000. 

On page 55, decrease the amount on line 16 

by $500,000,000. 

On page 55, decrease the amount on line 17 

by $500,000,000. 

On page 55, decrease the amount on line 23 

by $500,000,000. 

On page 55, decrease the amount on line 24 

by $500,000,000. 

On page 56, decrease the amount on line 5 

by $500,000,000. 

On page 56, decrease the amount on line 6 

by $500,000,000. 

On page 56, decrease the amount on line 12 

by $500,000,000. 

On page 56, decrease the amount on line 13 

by $500,000,000. 

On page 64, decrease the amount on line 9 

by $500,000,000. 

On page 64, decrease the amount on line 10 

by $4,300,000,000. 

On page 64, decrease the amount on line 11 

by $6,500,000,000. 

On page 65, decrease the amount on line 17 

by $900,000,000. 

On page 65, decrease the amount on line 18 

by $500,000,000. 

On page 65, decrease the amount on line 24 

by $1,000,000,000. 

On page 65, decrease the amount on line 25 

by $800,000,000. 

On page 66, decrease the amount on line 6 

by $1,000,000,000. 

On page 66, decrease the amount on line 7 

by $900,000,000. 

On page 66, decrease the amount on line 13 

by $1,000,000,000. 

On page 66, decrease the amount on line 14 

by $1,000,000,000. 

On page 66, decrease the amount on line 20 

by $1,000,000,000. 

On page 66, decrease the amount on line 21 

by $1,100,000,000. 

On page 67, decrease the amount on line 2 

by $1,000,000,000. 

On page 67, decrease the amount on line 3 

by $1,100,000,000. 

On page 67, decrease the amount on line 9 

by $1,000,000,000. 

On page 67, decrease the amount on line 10 

by $1,100,000,000. 

STEVENS (AND DOMENICI) 

AMENDMENT NO. 1129 

Mr. STEVENS (for himself and Mr. 

DOMENICI) proposed an amendment to 

the concurrent resolution Senate Concurrent Resolution 13, supra; as follows: 

At the appropriate place in Title III of the 

resolution insert the following new section: 

SEC. . SENSE OF THE CONGRESS REGARDING 

FULL FUNDING FOR DECADE OF THE 

BRAIN RESEARCH. 

(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

(1) long term health care costs associated 

with diseases and disorders of the brain have 

a substantial impact on federal expenditures 

for Medicaid and Medicare, and on the earning potential of the Nation; 

(2) to highlight the impact of brain diseases and disorders on the economy and well 

being of the Nation the Congress has declared the 1990’s the Decade of the Brain; 

(3) meaningful research has been initiated 

as part of the Decade of the Brain; 

(4) if fully funded this research could provide important new medical breakthroughs; 

and 

(5) these breakthroughs could result in a 

significant reduction in costs to the Federal 

Government. 

(b) SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.—It is the sense 

of the Congress that in furtherance of the 

goals of the Decade of the Brain the appropriate committees should seek to ensure 

that full funding is provided for research on 

brain diseases and disorders in each of the 

fiscal years to which this resolution applies. 

BUMPERS (AND OTHERS) 

AMENDMENT NO. 1130 

Mr. BUMPERS (for himself, Mr. 

BRADLEY, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. 

LIEBERMAN, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. EXON, Mr. 

WELLSTONE, Mrs. BOXER, and Mrs. 

FEINSTEIN) proposed an amendment to 

the concurrent resolution, Senate Concurrent Resolution 13, supra; as follows: 

Strike line 7 on page 76 through line 12 on 

page 77. 

f 

NOTICE OF HEARING 

COMMITTEE ON RULES AND ADMINISTRATION

Mr. STEVENS. Mr. President, I wish 

to announce that the Committee on 

Rules and Administration will meet in 

SR–301, Russell Senate Office Building, 

on Thursday, May 25, 1995, at 9:30 a.m., 

to receive testimony on the reauthorization of the Federal Election Commission. 

For further information concerning 

this hearing, please contact Mark 

Mackie of the committee staff on 224–

3448. 

mmaher on MIKETEMP with SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS