alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Airman helps deliver daughter, deploys same dayPublished Sept. 7, 2013
                        
                        By Senior Airman Benjamin Gonsier
                        
                        
                        2nd Bomb Wing Public Affairs
                **BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, La. (AFNS) --**
                (This feature is part of the "Through Airmen's Eyes" series on AF.mil. These stories focus on a single Airman, highlighting their Air Force story.)Airman 1st Class Timothy Pledger was scheduled to depart for his six-month deployment  in the early hours of the morning Aug. 30, but an aircraft malfunction pushed back his departure.Pledger returned home until the new departure time to be with his pregnant wife, who was expecting any day. Around 9 a.m., his wife's water broke. With no time to spare, Pledger took action."I called emergency services when her water broke," he said. "However, the baby was already coming out. I called them back so they could give me step-by-step instructions on how to deliver the baby." The emergency personnel told Pledger to ensure his wife was fine and to tell her to continue to push while also checking on the baby's condition. When the baby got stuck, Pledger said he had no idea what to do, but kept his composure and listened to the emergency personnel's directions. After applying what the emergency personnel told him, a few minutes later his daughter was completely out and breathing normally."The moment was magical," Pledger said. "I was all choked up and could barely talk." After the fire department and ambulance arrived, his wife and daughter were taken to a local hospital where they were stabilized and in good condition.  His daughter, Zoey, weighed in at 6 pounds, 9 ounces, and measured 19 inches."This is definitely a once in a lifetime situation," he added. "With the delayed jet in the beginning, it seems like this was meant to happen." Later that day, the electronic warfare journeyman was on the plane to Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, to support the continuous bomber presence mission. "This is a testament to Airmen we have at Barksdale (AFB) and the Air Force in general," said Master Sgt. Anthony Grubb, 2nd Aircraft Maintenance Squadron first sergeant. "To deliver his own daughter early in the morning, when he was supposed to deploy, and not even 12 hours later, go through the processing line and get on a jet to support the mission says a lot about the great Airmen we have here. Family is important and so is the mission, and Pledger was able to successfully support both."baby 



family 



deployment 



pregnancy
Order filed July 24, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00419-CV

____________

MARY ANN DEMARS AND ROBERT DEMARS, Appellant

V.

CHIA-SU CHOU & TEH-WEH CHOU, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 1

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 01-CCV-020224

ORDER

According to information provided to this court, appellants have filed a 

notice of appeal, but have not notified the District Clerk from what judgment they 

are appealing. 

The clerk’s record has not been filed in this appeal. The District Clerk has 

informed this court that appellant did not pay for preparation of the clerk’s record. 

In response to notices from this court, appellants informed this court that they are 

attempting to appeal without advanced payment of costs.
To determine our jurisdiction over this appeal, and if jurisdiction exists, 

whether appellant is entitled to proceed without the advance payment of costs, we 

issue the following order for a partial clerk’s record.

We order the Fort Bend County District Clerk to file a partial clerk’s record 

with the clerk of this court on or before August 25, 2014. In order that this court 

may ascertain its jurisdiction over the appeal, the partial clerk’s record shall 

contain (1) the judgment being appealed; (2) any motion for new trial, other postjudgment motion, or request for findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (3) the 

notice of appeal. In addition, the partial clerk’s record shall contain: (4)

appellant’s affidavit of indigence; (5) the contest(s) to the affidavit of indigence, if 

any; (6) the trial court’s order ruling on any contest; (7) any other documents 

pertaining to the claim of indigence and the contests thereto. 

If any of the above items are not part of the case file, the district clerk is 

directed to file a partial clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the 

omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, the Chief Executive Officer of PHL Variable Insurance Company (the registrant), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |  |  |                           |  |                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Date: March 18, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Philip K. Polkinghorn
|                     |  |  |  | Name:                     |  | Philip K. Polkinghorn
|                     |  |  |  | Title:                    |  | President
News United States Air Force
 AF awards new launch, test range service contractPublished Nov. 7, 2014
                **LOS ANGELES AIR FORCE BASE, El Segundo, Calif. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force awarded the Launch and Test Range Integrated Service Contract (LISC) to RGNext on Nov. 6.  The total contract value, including all potential options and potential award fee is $2 billion. LISC will provide the government with a single prime contractor responsible and accountable for operations, organizational- and depot-level maintenance, as well as sustainment at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida, and Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif.  
“I am proud of the men and women who operate, maintain, and sustain our ranges and the track record of mission success built over the years,” remarked Gen. John Hyten, the commander of Air Force Space Command.  “With LISC, we will continue to provide the same great range capability but now at a much more affordable price.”
The spacelift launch ranges provide a safe and secure environment to launch Air Force, Department of Defense (DOD), NASA, and commercial satellites into space to provide navigation, communications, weather, scientific, space control, and missile warning capabilities for global military operations, civil and commercial activities. 
In addition to supporting the launch missions, the Eastern Range and Western Ranges provide test range capabilities to meet DOD, Missile Defense Agency, and NASA requirements. The Air Force has the responsibility to ensure that launch and test operations are carried out without endangering the surrounding communities. *(Information courtesy of Air Force Space Command Public Affairs)*space 



satellites 



rocket launch 



Cape Canaveral 



Florida 



Vandenberg AFB 



Air Force in Space
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JEFFREY MARVIN.

March 27, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Hatler & Osborne v. Hunter & Lee.

(No. 28, Op. Book No. 1, p. 164.)

Appeal from Collin County.

April 12, 1877.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 9. *Demurrer and exceptions.*Any irreconcilable repugnancies between the original and amended petitions should be taken advantage of by exceptions or demurrer.

§ 10. *Amendments of pleading.*Smith v. McGauhey is cited, where it is held that the rules respecting the effect of a departure in pleading can have no application to amendments under our system. Where a party seeks to introduce, by amendment, matter which cannot be properly joined, the court on exceptions will exclude the proposed amendment. But the attempted amendment, however inconsistent or repugnant to, or however wide a departure from the case first stated, will not of course vitiate and annul the former pleading of the party. [13 Tex. 464.]

Reversed and remanded.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2172

RAAJ AMEXEM MOOR RAFA EL, a/k/a Roger Allen Moore,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND INCORPORATED; MARTIN O'MALLEY, Governor; 

NATHAN BRAVERMAN, District Court Judge; JOHN W. ANDERSON, 

Sheriff; NANCY K. KOPP, Treasurer; STEPHANIE RAWLINGS-BLAKE, 

Mayor; FRED BEELEFELD, III, Police Commissioner; BARACK H. 

OBAMA, President; ERIC HOLDER, Attorney General,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. 

(1:11-cv-02611-JKB)

Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 21, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raaj Amexem Moor Rafa El, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Raaj Amexem Moor Rafa El appeals the district court’s 

order dismissing his complaint for frivolousness. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rafa 

El v. Maryland, No. 1:11-cv-02611-JKB (D. Md. Sept. 28, 2011). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1003 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 117
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1003

                          [Report No. 110-55]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2007

                                Received

                             March 19, 2007

      Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

                             April 12, 2007

                Reported by Mr. Biden, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 to 
 reauthorize the United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF UNITED STATES ADVISORY COMMISSION ON 
              PUBLIC DIPLOMACY.

    Section 1334 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 
1998 (22 U.S.C. 6553) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2006'' and 
inserting ``October 1, 2009''.
                                                       Calendar No. 117

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1003

                          [Report No. 110-55]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 to 
 reauthorize the United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 12, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
News United States Air Force
 Single logon offers retirees simple access to secure sitesPublished Sept. 24, 2013
                        
                        By Debbie Gildea
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO - RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Airmen concerned about losing access to benefits web pages once they retire should establish their Department of Defense self-service logon identification account today, Air Force Personnel Center officials suggested. The common logon, developed by the DOD and Veterans' Administration allows beneficiaries of DOD or Veterans' Affairs programs to access various benefit websites using a single username and password. All military members are required to establish an account, said Karen Bennett, the AFPC Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System Operations branch chief.
"There are a number of actions the DS logon can help you accomplish when you access the various websites, like the eBenefits, milConnect, and more," said Bennett. "You'll be able to access your personal information, health care eligibility and personnel records, and can review your Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance elections or convert SGLI to Veterans' Group Life Insurance after separation -- all from one logon account."
Because access to the account does not require a common access card, Airmen, family members and retirees will be able to access their information 24/7 from their home computer.
"Although it doesn't require the CAC, this is a secure self-service tool, so your personally identifiable information, health information and other sensitive data won't be in danger of compromise," Bennett said. "Enrolling is simple -- go to the website, follow the prompts and in no time, you'll have the convenience and security of one-stop benefits access."
To access the site, go to https://myaccess.dmdc.osd.mil/dsaccess/ and follow the instructions. For more information about other personnel issues, visit the Air Force Personnel Services website at https://mypers.af.mil.AFPC 



personnel
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5577]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   ANNOUNCEMENT REGARDING EMERGENCY MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE ON RULES

  (Mr. SOLOMON asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. SOLOMON. Mr. Speaker, I will not go into the issue that the 
gentleman just brought up. I would call for an emergency meeting of the 
Committee on Rules right now up in room 314.

                          ____________________
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARREN WILLIAMS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 517 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of May, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
The Honorable D. Brook Bartlett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western 1 District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-4276

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Anthony W. Call, * * (UNPUBLISHED) Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 29, 1997 Fi led: June 2, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Anthony W. Call was convicted of possessing wit h intent to distribute crack and powder cocaine, see 2 1 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(iii), and (b)(1 )(C) (1988), and u sing a firearm during and in relation to a drug

traf ficking offense, see 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) (1988)
. The District Court sentenced Call to concurrent 190-mont h 1 terms on t he drug counts and a consecutive 60-month term-2-

on the firearm count. After the Supreme Court decide d Bai leyv. United States , 116 S. Ct. 501, 506 (1995 ) (defining-3-

“use” under § 924(c)(1)), Call filed a 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion att acking his firearm conviction. The government conc eded Call’s firearm conviction should be vacated i n light o f Bailey , but argued the District Court shoul d enh ance Call’s drug sentences under U.S. Sentencin g Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(b)(1) (1987) for hi s possession of a firea rm. The District Court vacated Call’s firearm conviction , assessed the firearm-possession enhancement, and resentenced Call to concurrent 210-month terms on the drug counts.
Onappeal, Call argues that the District Court lacke d juri sdiction to resentence him on the unchallenged dru g convictions, and that application of the firearm

possession enhancement violates double jeopardy and du e process. We conclude, however, that Call’s a rguments are fore closed by United States v. Harrison , No. 96-2544 , slip op. at 3-6 (8th Cir. May 9, 1997) (rejecting sam e arguments). Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court i s affirmed. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHT H CIRCUIT.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Nos. DA 21 - 0620 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. STEVEN JAMES CLIFTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

_______________________________________________________________ **ORDER**

_______________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 12, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve its Reply to the Appellee’s Response in this case . No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 28 2023

04/28/2023
Case Number: DA 21-0620
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# AF helicopter crashes in England

              - Published  Jan. 7, 2014

**ROYAL AIR FORCE LAKENHEATH, England (AFNS) --  **
An Air Force HH-60G Pave Hawk helicopter crashed at about 6 p.m. Greenwich Mean Time Jan. 7 near Salthouse on the Norfolk coast in England.

The aircraft, assigned to the 48th Fighter Wing, was on a low-level training mission when the crash occurred. The conditions of the four crew members are unknown at this time.

As soon as additional details become available, they will be provided.*(Information from a 48th Fighter Wing Public Affairs press release)*

HH-60

#             Related Links        

-  HH-60G Pave HawkFeb. 4, 2004                                    ​The primary mission of the HH-60G Pave Hawk helicopter is to conduct day or night personnel recovery operations into hostile environments to recover isolated personnel during war.                                 
-  Royal Air Force Lakenheath website
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of J.B., L.C., and A.M, )

children. )

)

)

S.L., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-230

) 

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN and )

FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM )

PROGRAM, )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed May 25, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Kimberly Hernandez 

Vance, Judge.

Norman A. Palumbo, Jr., Tampa, for 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Mary Soorus, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee 

Department of Children and Families.

Mikalla Andies Davis, Tallahassee, and 

Thomasina Moore and Laura J. Lee, 

Sanford, for Appellee Guardian Ad Litem 

Program.

PER CURIAM.
- 2 -

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 85 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1091]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     CLEAN WATER AMENDMENTS OF 1995

                                 ______

                               speech of

                            HON. BUD SHUSTER

                            of pennsylvania

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, May 10, 1995

       The House in Committee of the Whole House on the State of 
     the Union had under consideration the bill (H.R. 961) to 
     amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act:

  Mr. SHUSTER. Mr. Chairman, the committee report accompanying H.R. 
961, the Clean Water Amendments of 1995 (H. Rept. 104-112), 
inaccurately reports one of the roll call votes that was taken in the 
full Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. On the Mineta 
motion relating to unfunded mandates, listed on pages 199-200 of the 
committee report, the committee report indicates a yes vote by Mr. 
Zeliff.
  The committee records (included in the report filed with the Clerk) 
indicate that Mr. Zeliff's vote was no on that roll call. Apparently a 
printing mistake was made in the printing of the report. An errata 
sheet to the committee report will be printed correcting this mistake. 
The final record will indicate that Mr. Zeliff's vote was no on the 
Mineta motion relating to unfunded mandates.

                          ____________________
```