alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.3

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

I, Karen Montbach, a Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the
Company), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2011 between GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,
Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee (the Agreement), the following:

1. A review of the Companys activities as Certificate Administrator for the period ending December 31, 2011 and its
performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as
of and for the period ending December 31, 2011, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigneds individual capacity.

Date: February 28, 2012



Citibank, N.A.By:

/s/ Karen MontbachName:

Karen MontbachTitle:

Managing Director
SOLITARIO RESOURCES CORPORATION



Exhibit 10.11



SOLITARIO RESOURCES CORPORATION



1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN



FIFTH AMENDMENT



 
Pursuant to a consent resolution unanimously passed by the Board of Directors on November 3, 1999, and subsequently approved by appropriate regulatory authorities and an affirmative vote of the shareholders, the Company's 1994 Stock Option Plan, as amended, is modified as follows:



The second sentence in Section 2 shall be amended from: 



"The number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to options granted under this Plan shall not exceed 1,936,000 shares of Common Stock, as such Common Stock was constituted on the effective date of this Plan, or such greater number as may be approved from time to time by the shareholders of the Company."



To the Following:



"The number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to options granted under this Plan shall not exceed 2,336,000 shares of Common Stock, as such Common Stock was constituted on the effective date of this Plan, or such greater number as may be approved from time to time by the shareholders of the Company."



No other changes to the 1994 Stock Option Plan are made as a result of this Fifth Amendment to the Plan.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - 21 CFR Part 866
          - [Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0344]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is confirming the effective date of December 7, 2009, for the direct final rule that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 25, 2009 (74 FR 42773). The direct final rule corrects the regulation classifying herpes simplex virus (HSV) serological assays by removing the reference to HSV serological assays other than type 1 and type 2. This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule.                    

# DATES:

Effective date confirmed: December 7, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Scott McFarland, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. 5543, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-6217.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 25, 2009 (74 FR 42773), FDA solicited comments concerning the direct final rule for a 44-day period ending October 8, 2009. FDA stated that the effective date of the direct final rule would be on December 7, 2009, 60 days after the end of the comment period, unless any significant adverse comment was submitted to FDA during the comment period. FDA did not receive any significant adverse comments.                

Authority: Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 866 is amended. Accordingly, the amendments issued thereby are effective.

Dated: September 16, 2010.

Leslie Kux,

Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-23638 Filed 9-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Filed 6/19/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2013 ND 87

Robert Gray, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20130064

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Adam Lawrence Fleischman (argued) and Blake Dylan Hankey (on brief), 405 Bruce Avenue, Suite 100, Grand Forks, ND 58201, for petitioner and appellant.

Lloyd Clayton Suhr, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for respondent and appellee.

Gray v. State

No. 20130064

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Robert A. Gray appeals a district court order denying his application for postconviction relief after an evidentiary hearing.  Gray argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel, he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea to correct a manifest injustice and the prosecution failed to provide exculpatory evidence.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). 

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring
News United States Air Force
 TACPs control the sky over D-Day celebrationsPublished June 8, 2014
                        
                        By Senior Airman Alexander W. Riedel
                        
                        
                        Air Force News Service
                **CARENTAN, France (AFNS) --**
                Whenever Soldiers get into a rough spot under fire, they rely on Air Force tactical air control party members among their ranks to provide coordination and communications for vital support from the air -- on target and on time.
Likewise, Airmen also ensure the presence of airpower as Soldiers celebrate their own during the current 70th anniversary of D-Day across Normandy here June 4-8.
Working unseen by audience members and humbly hidden behind the scenes, TACP teams ensure flyovers  and parachute drops are orchestrated perfectly with ceremonies and memorial events on the ground -- while they time the arrival of the aircraft with pinpoint accuracy to coincide with the playing of the national anthems or other crucial markers.
“We ensure the aircrews have the right coordinates and current information from the ground,” said Tech. Sgt. Zachary Jacobs,  a joint terminal attack controller with the 116th Air Support Operations Squadron of the Washington Air National Guard. “The aircrews can calculate their speed in the air, but we provide all the information they need to get the job done.”
The teams coordinate with municipality officials, air traffic control and keep radio contact to the pilots as the aircrews recalculate their approach to match the TACPs’ guidance from the scene. 
Coordinating with a variety of aircraft from C-130 Hercules to B-52 Stratofortesses and fighter jets, the JTACS are in their element as liaisons between blue and green, while French citizens thank Army and Army Air corps veterans for their sacrifices in liberation their country.
“This is exactly who we work for,” Jacobs said. “We may be paid by the Air Force, but we work for the Army. We are the boots on the ground for the Air Force so they know what the Army needs them to do -- that coordination piece is huge for air assault support in the field.”
The battles for Europe in World War II also started the legacy of the TACP career field, Jacobs said.
“The significance for us is that it marks the invention of our career field,” he said. “Close air support came to be understood as something that needed to be controlled efficiently form the ground, which led to the development of our job as JTACs.”
Celebrating the allied veterans that helped liberate Normandy from Nazi occupation in 1944, the anniversary of D-Day is a date of national importance in France and across Europe.
“(Because this is our job) we don’t feel like we’re contributing too much,” said Senior Airman Jason Hoff, also a JTAC with the 16th ASOS. “But it’s an awesome opportunity to be here and see the amazing history all around us.”JTAC 



Normandy 



D-Day 



D-Day 70th Anniversary 



France 



TACP
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 3, 2011 

jam 

Order 

 

August 3, 2011 

143416 (22) 

TOMMIE LEE SEYMORE, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 143416 

 COA: 303278 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

 Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $19.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

 If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$356.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. 

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

 The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
News United States Air Force
 EOD master, senior master sergeants added to CSRB listPublished May 29, 2015
                        
                        By Debbie Gildea
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Explosive ordnance disposal master and senior master sergeants may now be eligible for a critical skills retention bonus (CSRB).
In an effort to meet mission requirements and retain senior-level experienced Airmen in critically undermanned specialties, EOD has been added to the CSRB list effective in May 2015.
EOD master and senior master sergeants who have at least 20 years of service, but no more than 22 years of service, will be offered the bonus.  Master sergeants will automatically get a high year tenure (HYT) waiver upon reenlisting under the retention program. Master sergeants who accept CSRB at 20 years or more will have their HYT adjusted to 25 years, the maximum allowed under the CSRB program.
Depending on the individual situation, bonuses could be between $30,000 and $75,000 total, payable in a lump sum or periodic installments. Eligible Airmen who reenlist on or after the May 13 effective date will be eligible for the retention bonus.
Additional information, including eligibility criteria, is available on the **myPers**.
For more information about Air Force personnel programs go to myPers. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one **here**.senior master sergeant 



master sergeant 



EOD 



CSRB
News United States Air Force
 LaPlante receives W. Stuart Symington AwardPublished Sept. 21, 2015
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Acquisition
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force Association presented Dr. William J. LaPlante the W. Stuart Symington Award at an Air Force anniversary dinner Sept. 16 at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in Washington D.C. 
LaPlante, the assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisition, is responsible for all Air Force research, development, acquisition and sustainment activities. LaPlante oversees a research and development, test, production and modernization program portfolio of more than $32 billion annually. 
He is also responsible for development and execution of policies and procedures in support of the operation and improvement of the Air Force's acquisition system.
AFA awards its highest honor every year for the most significant contribution by a civilian in the field of national defense, and presented it in conjunction with its 2015 Air and Space Conference and Technology Exposition this year.
LaPlante was commended for his public role in our nation’s defense and in development of acquisition policy. 
He joins other recipients such as former President George H. W. Bush, former Secretary of Defense Caspar W. Weinberger and former Secretary of State George P. Schultz.acquisition 



award 



W. Stuart Symington Award
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Franklin Street Properties Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, George J. Carter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:

 

|  | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|  | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|--|-----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 6                            |                    |
|------------------------------|-------------------------|
| Date: February 14, 2017 | /s/ George J. Carter    |
|                         | George J. Carter        |
|                         | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
News United States Air Force
 Air Force Global Strike Command completes accident investigationPublished Jan. 25, 2016
                        
                        
                        Air Force Global Strike Command Public Affairs
                **BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, La. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force Global Strike Command completed an accident investigation board following a May 2014 mishap during maintenance on an intercontinental ballistic missile.
On May 16, 2014, at approximately 11:15 p.m. MDT, a Minuteman III ICBM assigned to the 90th Missile Wing at F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming, became non-operational during a diagnostic test. While maintenance personnel were troubleshooting the issue, a mishap occurred that resulted in approximately $1.8 million of damage to the missile.
The incident did not result in any injuries, prevent the Air Force from meeting its ICBM requirements, or pose a hazard to public safety.
The Accident Investigation Board found that although the maintenance team chief was properly trained for the task he was performing, he mistakenly performed an action not directed by the technical guidance.
Accordingly, the team chief and the two Airmen on his team were decertified, retrained and returned to duty.
To prevent a reoccurrence of this mishap, the Air Force has strengthened technical guidance, modified training curriculum, and shared information with the other missile wings regarding the conditions that led to the mishap.
In accordance with Air Force policy, further details related to this mishap and its associated investigation are classified.ICBM 



Air Force Global Strike Command 



missile 



accident
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Microbics, Inc., (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert C.
Brehm, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                                     /s/ Robert C. Brehm
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Robert C. Brehm
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

                                                     August 20, 2004
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 2, 

2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-19-00092-CV

DESHON INVESTMENTS LLC, Appellant 

V.

MICHAEL J. CORDUA AND LUCIA C. CORDUA, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 269th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-51461 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order signed January 11, 2019 denying 

a motion to dismiss under chapter 27 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. 

On April 23, 2019, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.1. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel Consists of Justices Christopher, Hassan, and Poissant
EX-34.3
(logo)pwc

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of QBE Financial Institution Risk Services, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria,
that QBE First Insurance Agency, Inc. (the Company) complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for QBE FIRST Integrated Product Solution (the
Platform), as of December 31, 2011 and for the year then ended, excluding
criteria 1122(d)(1)(i) through 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(i) through
1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) through 1122(d)(3)(iv),
1122(d)(4)(i) through 1122(d)(4)(x),1122(d)(4)(xiv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which
the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities
performed by it with respect to the Platform, as outlined in Exhibit A to
management's assertion. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures
as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included
testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and
determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were
limited to the servicing activities performed by the Company during the
period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect
noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or
subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that QBE First Insurance Agency, Inc.
complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2011 for QBE FIRST Integrated Product Solution is
fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 8, 2012

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 10 Tenth Street, Northwest, Suite 1400, Atlanta,GA
30309-3851
T: (678) 419 1000,F: (678) 419 1239, www.pwc.com