alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Airmen, Soldiers, Marines attend Corporal’s Course at Al UdeidPublished June 22, 2014
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Ciara Wymbs
                        
                        
                        379th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs
                **AL UDEID AIR BASE, QATAR (AFNS) --**
                Airmen, Soldiers and Marines joined forces for a leadership course known to the United States Marine Corps as the Corporal's Course June 2 through 17 at Al Udeid Air Base.
A course normally provided to only Marine corporals to educate and cultivate their leadership skills, was made available for Airmen and Soldiers to gain lessons to grow as aspiring NCOs.
The course instructor's goal was to build the students for the future.
"When we have a group of new leaders they only have one mind set," said Sgt. Justin Daniels, a Corporal's Course instructor. "I wanted to present the students new challenges, new ways to do things and new thought processes while developing them for their future roles."
Senior Airman Luke Meister, a 379th Expeditionary Contracting Squadron contracting officer, said he looked at the class as a fortunate way to gain education while abroad.
"It is an insane opportunity," he said. "I have not met another person of my rank to be able to go to another service's PME, especially while deployed."
The course encompassed lessons from the Marine Corp Warfighting Publication 6-11, which features material on the Marine ethos, foundations and challenges of leadership.
Cpl. Charles Hall, a Marine Tactical Electronic Warfare Squadron electronic interceptor operator analyst in the course, wanted to gain as much knowledge as possible to be a standout leader.
"Going into the course I wanted to learn how to be an effective leader," Hall said. "I want to be able to convey information in a way where my subordinates will emulate what they are taught positively."
Not only did the course teach the E-4's about leadership skills, but it also showed them they have more in common with their sister services than they thought.
"I learned how to set the example and how to lead people," Hall said. "I also saw that we are not as different from other E-4's in other services as I thought we were."
As the course wrapped up, Daniels realized that as the instructor he had learned a lesson in adjusting his leadership style as well.
"This course actually helped me a lot," Daniels said. "Working with the different branches showed me the branches work differently from each other, and that having the many personalities and different ways of doing things helped my versatility as a leader."Joint Training 



Marine Corps 



Corporal's Course
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1001 

To amend the Haitian Hemispheric Opportunity through Partnership Encouragement Act of 2006 to extend the date for the President to determine 

if Haiti meets certain requirements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2007 

Mr. SPRATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Haitian Hemispheric Opportunity through 

Partnership Encouragement Act of 2006 to extend the 

date for the President to determine if Haiti meets certain 

requirements, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TIME FOR PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION RE4 GARDING HAITI. 

5 Section 213A(d)(2) of the Caribbean Basin Economic 

6 Recovery Act, as added by section 5002(a) of the Haitian 

7 Hemispheric Opportunity through Partnership EncourVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:57 Feb 15, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1001.IH H1001

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1001 IH

1 agement Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–432), is amended 

2 by striking ‘‘90 days’’ and inserting ‘‘1 year’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
_________________ 

_________________ 

 

Cite as: 574 U. S. ____ (2014) 1 

Statement of THOMAS, J. 

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

No. 14A493 

MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, ET AL., v. 

ANGEL LOPEZ-VALENZUELA, ET AL. 

ON APPLICATION FOR STAY 

[November 13, 2014] 

The application for stay presented to JUSTICE KENNEDY 

and by him referred to the Court is denied. The order 

heretofore entered by JUSTICE KENNEDY is vacated. 

Statement of JUSTICE THOMAS, with whom JUSTICE 

SCALIA joins, respecting the denial of the application for a 

stay.

Petitioner asks us to stay a judgment of the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit holding 

unconstitutional an amendment to the Arizona Constitution that the State’s citizens approved overwhelmingly in 

a referendum eight years ago. I join my colleagues in 

denying this application only because there appears to be 

no “reasonable probability that four Justices will consider 

the issue sufficiently meritorious to grant certiorari.” 

Hollingsworth v. Perry, 558 U. S. 183, 190 (2010) (per 

curiam). That is unfortunate. 

We have recognized a strong presumption in favor of 

granting writs of certiorari to review decisions of lower 

courts holding federal statutes unconstitutional. See 

United States v. Bajakajian, 524 U. S. 321, 327 (1998); 

United States v. Gainey, 380 U. S. 63, 65 (1965). States 

deserve no less consideration. See Janklow v. Planned 

Parenthood, Sioux Falls Clinic, 517 U. S. 1174, 1177 

(1996) (SCALIA, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari) 

(“This decision is questionable enough that we should, 

since the invalidation of state law is at issue, accord re-
 

2 MARICOPA COUNTY v. LOPEZ-VALENZUELA 

Statement of THOMAS, J. 

view”). Indeed, we often review decisions striking down 

state laws, even in the absence of a disagreement among 

lower courts. See, e.g., Hollingsworth v. Perry, 570 U. S. 

___ (2013); Cook v. Gralike, 531 U. S. 510 (2001); Saenz v. 

Roe, 526 U. S. 489 (1999); Renne v. Geary, 501 U. S. 312 

(1991); Massachusetts v. Oakes, 491 U. S. 576 (1989). But 

for reasons that escape me, we have not done so with any 

consistency, especially in recent months. See, e.g., Herbert 

v. Kitchen, ante, p. ___; Smith v. Bishop, ante, p. ___; 

Rainey v. Bostic, ante, p. ___; Walker v. Wolf, ante, p. ___;

see also Otter v. Latta, ante, p. ___ (denying a stay); Parnell v. Hamby, ante, p. ___ (same). At the very least, we

owe the people of Arizona the respect of our review before

we let stand a decision facially invalidating a state constitutional amendment. 

Of course, the Court has yet to act on a petition for a

writ of certiorari in this matter, and I hope my prediction

about whether that petition will be granted proves wrong. 

Our recent practice, however, gives me little reason to be 

optimistic.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          40,345
<SECURITIES>                                    48,147
<RECEIVABLES>                                  289,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,956
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               424,773
<PP&E>                                         288,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                  90,564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 878,239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          257,179
<BONDS>                                        177,350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           751
<OTHER-SE>                                     412,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   878,239
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               254,690
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  227,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2,327)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,443
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,438
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,005
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,005
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GREGORY WALLACE.

February 28, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements for the six month period ended  June 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                         381
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               381
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          381
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       469,203
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,619)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   435
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               18
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                18
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            18
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   18
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
#### W. A. Woods & Co. v. E. P. Davis.

(No. 675, Op. Book No. 2, p. 141.)

Appeal from Washington County.

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 952. *Statute of frauds; acceptance of order.*W. & Co. sold O. a bill of lumber, and O. directed them to call on D. for the money; that D. had funds in his hands belonging to him, C. W. & Co. presented their bill for the lumber to D., who acknowledged that it was right, and that he had funds belonging to C. sufficient to pay it, and he did pay a part of the bill, promising to pay the balance at a future time. C. died, and after his death D. refused to pay the balance of the bill to W. & Co. Held, that the promise of D. to pay the debt was not within the statute of frauds; that it was not a promise to pay the debt of another, but his own debt. He had funds in his hands belonging to C., and for which, he was responsible to pay O. He held these funds subject to C.’s order, and he accepted in effect O.’s order to pay them to W. & Co. to the amount of their bill. This case is not distinguishable from the numerous cases which hold that a verbal promise to accept a bill of exchange is not within the statute when the promisor holds funds of the drawer to meet it. “ No new obligation is imposed on the promisor. He owes the drawer the amount of the fund in his hands, and by agreement with him, recognized by the payee, he pays the drawer by paying the creditor.” [Browne on Stat. Frauds, § 172.] When the debtor owes a third party, and the third party owes the plaintiff, and by agreement between the three parties the defendant is to pay the amount of his debt directly to the plaintiff, although the third party remains liable to the plaintiff, the promise of the defendant, being really a promise to pay his own debt, is not required to be in writing. [Browne on Stat. Frauds, §214; Thomp. on Verbal Agree. 511.] The case of Bason v. Hughart, 2 Tex. 476, and the *535case of Warren v. Smith, 24 Tex. 484, are not analogous to' this case. The question involved in those.cases was whether the promise to - pay. the debt of another thereby extinguished the original debt,,in which case it was .held' to be not within the statute of frauds, but an original-undertaking for a valuable consideration.

June 9, 1880.

Reversed and remanded.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 54 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas the Creole Nature Trail All-American Road District 

Board of Commissioners has begun to create and develop 

a National Hurricane Museum and Science Center in the 

southwest Louisiana area; 

Whereas protecting, preserving, and showcasing the intrinsic 

qualities that make Louisiana a one-of-a-kind 
2 

•HCON 54 EH 

experience is the mission of the Creole Nature Trail AllAmerican Road; 

Whereas the horrific experience and the devastation longterm effects of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita will play a 

major role in the history of the United States; 

Whereas a science center of this caliber will educate and motivate young and old in the fields of meteorology, environmental science, sociology, conservation, economics, history, communications, and engineering; 

Whereas it is only appropriate that the effects of hurricanes 

and the rebuilding efforts be captured in a comprehensive 

center such as a National Hurricane Museum and 

Science Center to interpret the effects of hurricanes in 

and outside of Louisiana; and 

Whereas it is critical that the history of past hurricanes be 

preserved so that all people in the United States can 

learn from this history: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress supports and encourages the 

3 creation of a National Hurricane Museum and Science 

4 Center in southwest Louisiana. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 54 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the support of Congress for the creation 

Center in Southwest Louisiana. of a National Hurricane Museum and Science
CEOAmendedandRestatedServiceAgreement




AMENDMENT AGREEMENT 
(“Amendment”)
dated as of October 28, 2014
between
Charles Christopher O’Kane
and 
Aspen Insurance UK Services Limited (“AIUKSL”) 
Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited (“AIHL” and, together with Mr. O’Kane and AIUKSL, the “Parties”)


WHEREAS the Parties have entered into the Amended and Restated Service Agreement, dated as September 24, 2004 (the “Service Agreement”) which Service Agreement includes an excise tax gross-up provision;
WHEREAS the Parties have now agreed to amend certain of the terms and provisions of the Agreement by this Amendment;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements herein contained, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
		
	1.
	Amendment of the Service Agreement


Upon execution of this Amendment by the Parties, the Service Agreement shall be and is hereby amended as follows:


Section 15.2 (b)(ii) is deleted in its entirety.


		
	2.
	Miscellaneous




		
	(a)
	Entire Agreement. This Amendment constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the Parties with respect to the subject matter and supersedes all oral communications and prior writings with respect thereto.




		
	(b)
	Service Agreement Continuation. The Service Agreement, as modified herein, shall continue in full force and effect.




		
	(c)
	Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed and delivered in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original.




		
	(d)
	Headings. The headings used in this Amendment are for convenience of reference only and are not to affect the construction of or to be taken into consideration in interpreting this Amendment.




		
	(e)
	Governing Law. This Amendment is subject to English law and the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts.









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the first date specified above. 


Charles Christopher O’Kane
By: /s/ Charles Christopher O’Kane
Name: Charles Christopher O’Kane 
Title: Chief Executive Officer 
Date: October 28, 2014
Aspen Insurance UK Services Limited
By: /s/ Michael Cain
Name: Michael Cain 
Title: Director 
Date: October 28, 2014
Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited
By: /s/ Patricia Roufca
Name: Patricia Roufca 
Title: Associate Group General Counsel and Company Secretary 
Date: October 28, 2014
News United States Air Force
 CSAF Call to Airmen: 2015 Reading ListPublished Aug. 14, 2014
                        
                        By Air Force Public Affairs Agency OL-Pentagon
                        
                        
                        Staff Sgt. Carlin Leslie
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                For the past eight years the chiefs of staff of the Air Force along with the chief master sergeants of the Air Force, have created a comprehensive reading list of motivating and inspiring material that invigorates and gives a perspective to Airmen in their Air Force careers, highlighting a common theme.
The Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. Mark A. Welsh III has issued a call to all Airmen, to help create the 2015 CSAF Professional Reading Program, asking for submissions that center on the profession of arms and more specifically the Air Force core values: Integrity first, service before self and excellence in all we do.
“I ask you to give me your thoughts on those books and movies that have inspired you throughout your service as an Airman, that have made you proud to be among the half-a-percent of Americans who’ve dedicated themselves to the profession of arms, or gave you a new perspective on Integrity, service, or excellence,” Welsh said.
The program was started in 1996 by Gen. Ronald Fogleman, who created the CSAF reading program to develop a common frame of reference among Air Force members -- officers, enlisted, and civilians that effectively advocates for air and space power. Chiefs of staff since then have enhanced and continued the Professional Reading Program.
The list has inspired and highlighted many areas throughout the years of its existence to include books, conferences, films, art and photographers that give sight into the military way of life and Air Force core values.
“A list will be built that will make our Air Force stronger,” Welsh said. “I’m excited to hear from you and excited to read some terrific books recommended by the greatest Airmen in the world! Thanks for all you do.”
To view the current 2014 CSAF reading list visit http://static.dma.mil/usaf/csafreadinglist/index.html and follow the link forsubmissions to answer the call.CSAF Reading List 



Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force 



CMSAF James A. Cody 



Gen. Mark Welsh III 



education 



inspiration 



CSAF
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of VSUS Technologies Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the nine month period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kyle Gotshalk, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: January 25, 2011By: /s/ Kyle GotshalkKyle GotshalkChief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



BEA SYSTEMS, INC.



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002



In connection with the periodic report of BEA Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,
Alfred S. Chuang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 14, 2004



/s/    ALFRED S. CHUANGAlfred S. ChuangChief Executive Officer