alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Steven L. Muellner, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Meade Instruments Corp.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingDate: November 27, 2006     By: /s/ Steven L. Muellner       President and CEO
exv4wb



 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Page 18 of 19
Pages




Exhibit 4-B



REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT JOINDER



     As of the date set forth below, the undersigned, as a holder of membership
interests in Educational Simon, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
(“Educational Simon”), is acquiring from Educational
Simon
     1,044,705     
shares of common stock (the “Shares”) of Excelligence Learning Corporation, a
Delaware corporation and successor entity to LearningStar Corp. (the
“Company”), in connection with a distribution to members of Educational Simon
on such date. By execution of this Registration Rights Agreement Joinder, the
undersigned, as successor to Educational Simon in respect of the Shares, shall
be deemed to be a party to that certain Amended and Restated Registration
Rights Agreement, entered into effective as of June 30, 2001
(the “Registration
Rights Agreement”), by and among the Company and the certain stockholders of
the Company identified from time to time on the signature pages thereto.
Pursuant to Sections 13 and 25 of the Registration Rights Agreement, the
undersigned, as successor to Educational Simon in respect of the Shares, shall
have all rights, and shall observe all the obligations, applicable to a
“Holder” under the Registration Rights Agreement. In order to give effect to
this transaction, please add the undersigned to the list of
“Holders” as set
forth in Schedule A to the Registration Rights Agreement.



	 	 	 
	 	 	
Name of Individual or Entity:
	 
	 	 	IPP99 Private
Equity, L.L.C.



	 
	 	 	
Address for Notices:
	 
	 	 	
310 South Street

P.O. Box 1913

Morristown, NJ  07962-1913
	 
	 	 	
IPP99 Private Equity, L.L.C.

        
BY:  WESKIDS III, L.L.C.

        
ITS:  Managing Member
	 
	Date: November 20, 2003	 	
By: /s/ Christine W. Jenkins



       Name:  Christine W. Jenkins

       Title: Vice President
News United States Air Force
 1,257 selected for promotion to senior master sergeantPublished March 5, 2015
                        
                        By Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO - RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force has selected 1,257 master sergeants for promotion to senior master sergeant.The selection rate was 8.75 percent, with an average selectee overall score of 680.90. Selectees' average time-in-grade was 4.34 years and time-in-service was 18.79 years. Average enlisted performance report score was 135; average decorations score was 20.67; U.S. Air Force Supervisory Examination average score was 79.38; and the average board score was 393.44.To see the selectee list, go to the Air Force Portal and select the promotions link, or go tomyPers and select "Search All Components" from the drop down menu, enter "Active Duty: Enlisted Promotions Home Page" in the search window and scroll down to the appropriate section.To access test and board scores, go to the Virtual Military Personnel Flight via the secure applications page.Selectees will be promoted in order of promotion sequence number beginning in April.Selections are tentative until the data verification process is complete, which is normally within 10 days of the promotion release date. Personnel officials will notify Airmen, via military personnel sections, if their selection is in question.For more information about Air Force personnel programs, go to myPers.AFPC 



promotion 



rank 



E-8 



SMSgt 



senior master sergeant
##### 



ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
Amended and Restated as of February, 2008
 ARTICLE I
  ARTICLE II
          ARTICLE III
  ARTICLE IV




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
  ARTICLE VI
  2




---



##### 



ARTICLE VII
  3




---



##### 



BY-LAWS
Amended as of February, 2008
 ARTICLE I
NAME AND LOCATION
 Section 1. Name.
 Section 2. Location of Office.
 ARTICLE II
PURPOSES
  ARTICLE III
MEMBERSHIP
 Section 1
 Class A.
 Class B.
 Class C.
 1




---



##### 



Class D.
 Section 2. Voting.
    Section 3. Termination of Members.
 2




---



##### 



Section 4. Affiliation of Members.
 ARTICLE IV  REGIONS
 Section 1 Regions.
 Section 2. Assignment of Members to Regions.
 3




---



##### 



Section 3. Representation Committee.
 Section 4. Region Councils.
 ARTICLE V MEETINGS OF MEMBERS
 Section 1. Annual Meeting of Members.
 4




---



##### 



Section 2. Special Meetings of Members.
 Section 3. Notice of Meetings.
 Section 4. Meetings of Members within Regions.
 Section 5. Quorum.
 Section 6. Election of Directors.
 ARTICLE VI
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 Section 1. Number.
 5




---



##### 



Section 2. Term of Office.
  Section 3. Qualifications.
      Section 4. Apportionment of Directors.
 6




---



##### 



Section 5. Nomination of Directors.
 Section 6. Vacancies
 Section 7. Removal of Directors
 Section 8. Meetings.
   Section 9. Quorum.
 7




---



##### 



Section 10. Powers and Duties.
 Section 11. Annual Audit.
 Section 12. Compensation.
 Section 13 Executive Committee.
 ARTICLE VII
OFFICERS
 Section 1. Officers.
 Section 2. Duties of Chairman.
 Section 3. Duties of Vice Chairmen.
 8




---



##### 



Section 4. Duties of Secretary.
 Section 5. Duties of Treasurer.
 Section 6. President and Vice Presidents.
 Section 7. Duties of President.
  Section 8. Compensation of Personnel.
 9




---



##### 



Section 9. Removal.
 ARTICLE VIII
METHOD OF OPERATION
 Section 1.
 Section 2.
  .
   10




---



##### 



11




---



##### 



12




---



##### 



Section 3.
 13




---



##### 



ARTICLE IX
MISCELLANEOUS
 Section 1. Business with Non-Members.
 Section 2. Lien.
 Section 3. Transfer of Stock.
 Section 4. Indemnification of Directors, Officers, and Employees.
  ARTICLE X
DISSOLUTION
 14




---



##### 



Section 1.
 ARTICLE XI
FISCAL YEAR
  15
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>                          5 
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-25-1998
<CASH>                                       4,894
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               95,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                105,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           212,570
<PP&E>                                     185,611
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             445,975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       99,659
<BONDS>                                      8,029
<COMMON>                                   304,630
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               445,975
<SALES>                                    240,537
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           240,537
<CGS>                                      152,788
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              212,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,903
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             24,653
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,281
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         16,372
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                16,372
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.84
        





</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.01




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Tom Hofer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Vendalux Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Vendalux Corporation.

By: /s/
   ------------------------------
Name: Tom Hofer
Title:   Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-33.7


(logo) WELLS FARGO




Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Document Custody


1015 10th Avenue Southeast


Minneapolis, MN 55414






ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA




The Document Custody Section of the Corporate Trust Services division of Wells


Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Company") is responsible for assessing


compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation


AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has


determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the


servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:




Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed


securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January


1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any


such securities issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government


(other than the Federal Deposit Insurance Company) or any government sponsored


entity (the "Platform").




Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item


1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities


performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable


Servicing Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other


servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the


Platform.




Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 (the "Period").




With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following


assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:




1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable


Servicing Criteria.




2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.


In performing this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the


Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation


AB.




3. Based on such assessment for the Period, the Company has complied, in all


material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.




KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an


attestation report with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance for


the Period.






WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION




By: /s/ Shari Gillund


Shari Gillund




Its: Senior Vice President




Dated: February 23, 2012
# **Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended November 1, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David E. Ullman, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

 

 
| Date:  June 9, 2004 |   /s/ David E. Ullman |   |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                          |  David E. Ullman           |
|                          |  Chief Financial Officer   |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H5681-H5682]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       ON AMENDMENTS TO H.R. 1561

  (Mrs. SCHROEDER asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute.)
  Mrs. SCHROEDER. Mr. Speaker, does that mean that no one else will be 
able to offer amendments? We have only got this 1 hour and 45 minutes 
and, as you know, I have a very, I think, important amendment dealing 
with immigration, [[Page H5682]] which I do not even think should be in 
this bill. Does that mean that we are not going to have time to get to 
anybody else's amendment?
  Mr. GILMAN. Mr. Speaker, will the gentlewoman yield?
  Mrs. SCHROEDER. I yield to the gentleman from New York.
  Mr. GILMAN. Mr. Speaker, it will all depend on the amount of time 
that we can conserve in the remaining time that has been allotted to us 
by the rule. We have an hour and 45 minutes remaining, and we will try 
to work with the minority as best we can.
  Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts. Mr. Speaker, will the gentlewoman yield?
  Mrs. SCHROEDER. I yield to the gentleman from Massachusetts.
  Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts. Mr. Speaker, I would just like to note 
that under this unfair rule we have, the quorum call, a totally 
unnecessary quorum call came out of the time for amendments. We will 
probably have one less amendment because for no valid parliamentary 
reason, we spent about 25 minutes with a quorum call so somebody could 
get a bigger audience. And under the crazy rule we have, a quorum call 
comes out of the time and the quorum call has probably eclipsed one 
amendment.
  Mr. GILMAN. Mr. Speaker, if the gentlewoman will continue to yield, 
let me explain that on four occasions this evening, I attempted to 
arrive at unanimous consent to cut back on the debate time so we would 
have additional time left for other amendments.
  Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts. Mr. Speaker, if the gentlewoman will 
continue to yield, I do not regard it as an acceptable trade-off that 
you cut off debate time to have a quorum call. I do not think cutting 
debate on important amendments is an acceptable defense of a very 
arbitrary and unfair rule.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 New SecAF committed to Airmen, mortuary missionPublished Jan. 17, 2014
                        
                        By Christin Michaud
                        
                        
                        Air Force Mortuary Affairs Office Public Affairs
                **DOVER AIR FORCE BASE, Del. (AFNS) --**
                Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James came to Dover Air Force Base Jan. 10, for the second time since becoming the 23rd secretary of the Air Force.
James' first visit was under different circumstances, she said.
"The first one was rather sobering and sad, but it was an honor to be part of it," James said.
Just 10 days after being sworn in, James attended the dignified transfer of an Airman killed in Afghanistan. His remains first arrived in the U.S. at Dover AFB.
James saw more of the sacred mission and met with the men and women who support it during her second visit. She received an orientation of the Air Force Mortuary Affairs facility and Campus for Families of the Fallen.
The secretary has taken three trips to the field, two of which have been to Dover AFB.
"That should tell you how important this mission is," said James to an All Call audience here, referring to the port mortuary as the heart of Dover AFB's mission.
The managers on duty at the Fisher House for Families of the Fallen were among the first to receive the secretary's coin for their work and support for the families.
"The effort she is putting forth to understand what we do shows that our mission is inevitably a priority," said Tech. Sgt. Cheryl Uylaki, the Fisher House NCO in charge. "She expressed sincere interest in ensuring the exceptional Airmen we have today, supporting our families, are receiving the right training."
Uylaki said she was touched that the secretary showed concern not only for the families, but for the well-being of the Airmen who care for those families long after they leave AFMAO.
"People are the core of our mission," James said when she returned two days later with Gen. Mark A. Welsh, the Chief of Staff and Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force James Cody to honor the Airmen killed in England.
In her three weeks as the secretary, it was her third trip to Dover.Deborah James 



Mortuary Affairs 



Dover AFB 



Senior Leaders 



SecAF
#### B. L. Aycock v. W. H. Doty.

(No. 2484, R. Book No. 4, p. 185.)

Appeal from Falls County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 221. *Arbitration, award; suit to set aside.*In a suit to set aside a statutory award, wherein it was expressly agreed that the decision of the arbitrators should be final, and that neither party could prosecute an appeal therefrom, the ground of the suit being gross mistake on part of the arbitrators in allowing an item of damage, and the further ground that the award was based upon perjured statements made the arbitrators, *held,*that either ground would be sufficient to set aside the award, if sustained, provided the complaining party was not guilty of negligence in failing to have these wrongs righted before the arbitrators. An award influenced or procured by fraud, partiality, misconduct or gross mistake on the part of the arbitrators, will be set aside and not made a judgment of court, even though no right of appeal was reserved in the agreement to arbitrate, and notwithstanding there has been a compliance with the statute. Rev. Stats, arts. 42 to 56. [Payne v. Metz, 14 Tex. 56; Forshey v. R. R. Co. 16 Tex. 516.]

§ 222. *Consolidation of suits.*It is error, where two or more suits have been properly consolidated, for the court to set aside the consolidation; and if the exercise of such discretion works a manifest injury to one of the parties, it is not only subject of revision on appeal, but reversible error. [Rev. Stats, art. 1450.]

*89November 8, 1882.

§ 223. *Suit to set aside an award.*In a suit to set aside an award, where it is pleaded that the party in whose favor the award was rendered is insolvent, set-offs pleaded which were not embraced in the agreement to arbitrate, and not considered and determined by the award, should be allowed against the judgment to be rendered upon the award. [Castro v. Gentiley, 11 Tex. 28; Simpson v. Huston, 14 Tex. 476; Hamilton v. Van Hook, 26 Tex. 302; Thomas v. Hill, 3 Tex. 270.] But the award will be held conclusive and final on such pleadings as to all those matters which were embraced in the arbitration agreement, and with regard to these no complaint will be heard from either party.

Eeversed and remanded.