alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Peter S. Bruner v. Dubard & Nason.

(No. 2462, Op. Book No. 4.)

Error from Falls County.

May 30, 1883.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 391. *Distress warrant; petition must be filed, tvhen.*The distress warrant was made returnable to the “ January” term of the county court of Palls county, but at the subsequent trial of the cause was so amended, under order of the court, as to substitute Pebruary for January. Plaintiff, in the distress warrant, filed his petition on the 7th of April. A motion was made to dismiss the petition because not filed at the proper time. This motion was overruled. *Held,*error. Where a party sues out a distress warrant he must file his petition on or before the appearance day of the court to which the warrant is returnable. [Rev. Stats, arts. 3114, 3115, 3120; Braley v. Bailey (Ct. App.), *post,*p. 434.]

Reversed and dismissed.
Exhibit 10.3


                                    CONFIRMATION


TO: MICHAEL GREEN

         This is to confirm renewal of the employment agreement made as of
October 1, 2000, for a further one year period commencing on October 1, 2003,
and ending on September 30, 2004, under the same terms and conditions,
including, the terms relating to compensation.

         Dated at Markham this 1st day of October, 2003


         MIAD SYSTEMS LTD.


         Per:      /s/ Michael Green
              --------------------------------

               Michael Green - President
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY CORP.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Travelers Property Casualty Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert I. Lipp, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated this 31st day of October, 2003

|                                                           |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Robert I. Lipp

Robert I. Lipp
Chief Executive Officer |  |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Viewpoint Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Patrick Vogt and
William H. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                          |     |                                        
|------------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------
|Dated:
  November 9, 2006 | By: | /s/ PATRICK
  VOGT                     
|                          |     |                                        
|                          |     | Patrick Vogt                           
|                          |     | President
  and Chief Executive Officer
|                          |     |                                        
|Dated:
  November 9, 2006 | By: | /s/ WILLIAM
  H. MITCHELL              
|                          |     |                                        
|                          |     | William H.
  Mitchell                  
|                          |     | Chief
  Financial Officer              

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

HAMEED CAHOON,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 75 WM 2014

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19 th day of November, 2014, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED , and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or

Extraordinary Relief is DENIED

.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 12320 and # 12321]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New Mexico (FEMA-1936-DR), dated 09/13/2010. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         07/25/2010 through 08/09/2010.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         09/13/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/12/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/13/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/13/2010, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties: Cibola, Mckinley, Mora, San Juan, Socorro. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12320B and for economic injury is 12321B. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2010-23529 Filed 9-20-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
580 A.2d 271

#### IN THE MATTER OF OLLEN B. HINNANT, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 15, 1990.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court, recommending that OLLEN B. HINNANT of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this state in 1963, be publicly reprimanded for charging fees that amounted to overreaching, in violation of *DR*2-106(D), and for engaging in a conflict of interest in a real estate transaction, in violation of *DR*5-105(A), *396and the Court having reviewed the record and having heard the argument of counsel, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report of the Disciplinary Review Board is adopted, and OLLEN B. HINNANT is hereby publicly reprimanded for his violation of *DR*2-106(D) and *DR*5-105(A); and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

WITNESS, the Honorable Robert N. Wilentz, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 2nd day of October, 1990.
759 A.2d 912

#### Alton D. BROWN, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 20, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 20th day of September, 2000, probable jurisdiction is noted and the order appealed is affirmed.
Agreement for Assignment of Stock Options



 EXHIBIT 10.74 
  
 AGREEMENT FOR ASSIGNMENT OF STOCK OPTIONS 
  
 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 5th day of February, 1999, by and among Boland T. Jones (“BTJ”);
Seven Gables Management Company, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (the “LLC”); Seven Gables Partnership, L.P., a Georgia limited partnership (the “Partnership”); and Premiere Technologies, Inc., a Georgia corporation
(“Premiere”). 
  
 BTJ owns, before the transfer
described below, One Million Four Hundred Forty Thousand (1,440,000) nonqualified stock options (the “Options”) of Premiere, with vesting dates of November 6, 1996, 1997 and 1998, granted under that certain Amended and Restated Executive
Employment and Incentive Option Agreement dated November 6, 1995 (the “Agreement”). 
  
 BTJ hereby transfers, assigns, conveys and sets over to the Partnership, its successors, representatives and assigns, as a contribution to the capital of the Partnership, all of his right, title and interest in and to
the Options, together with all the powers, options, privileges and immunities therein contained. 
  
 Pursuant to Sections 2.2.5 and 17 of the Agreement, Premiere hereby consents to the transfer described above (the “Transfer”) and acknowledges
and agrees that this instrument of transfer is in form and substance satisfactory to Premiere and that the Transfer is in full compliance with the Agreement. With respect to the Transfer, Premiere hereby waives any requirement of an opinion of
counsel regarding federal or state securities laws. 
  
 After the
Transfer, the Partnership is the owner of the Options. The Partnership, and the LLC as general partner of the Partnership, hereby accept and agree to be bound by all of the terms and provisions of the Agreement relating to the Options and any shares
of stock issuable upon exercise of the Options. 
  
 This Agreement
may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which taken together will constitute one and the same instrument. 
  
  
 [SIGNATURES ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement for Assignment of Stock Options,
Premiere acting by and through its duly authorized officer, this 5th day of February, 1999. 
  

	 PREMIERE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

		
	By:	 	/s/ Patrick G. Jones
	 	

	 	 	 
	 Title: Sr. V.P.



  
  

	 SEVEN GABLES MANAGEMENT

	 COMPANY, LLC



  

	 
		
	By:	 	/s/ Boland T. Jones
	 	

	 	 	 Boland T. Jones, Member



  
  

	 
		
	By:	 	/s/ Andrea L. Jones
	 	

	 	 	 Andrea L. Jones, Member



  
  
  
  
 [SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 








	 SEVEN GABLES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

		
	By:	 	Seven Gables Management
	 	 	 Company, LLC General Partner



  
  

	 
		
	By:	 	/s/ Boland T. Jones
	 	

	 	 	 Boland T. Jones, Member



  
  

	 
		
	By:	 	/s/ Andrea L. Jones
	 	

	 	 	 Andrea L. Jones, Member
760 A.2d 368

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Jeffrey Marc ROBINSON, Respondent.

No. 615 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Oct. 2, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2000, there having been filed with this Court by .Jeffrey Marc Robinson his *295verified Statement of Resignation dated August 24, 2000, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Jeffrey Marc Robinson be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
Order filed January 11, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-01122-CV

____________

BEN CAVIL, Appellant

V.

FV-1 TRUST FOR STANLEY MORTGAGE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, L.L.C., 

Appellee

On Appeal from County Court No. 3

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV-0068250

ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment signed September 25, 2012. On 

December 17, 2012, appellant filed a motion in this court requesting a temporary 

stay of the judgment and execution of the writ of possession on the property 

located at 3937 Lake Star Drive, League City, Texas 77573. The motion was 

granted and a response requested from appellee, FV-1 in Trust for Morgan Stanley 

Mortgage Capital Holdings, L.L.C. A response has been filed. 
Because no supersedeas bond was filed within ten days of the judgment, the 

judgment may not be stayed pending appeal. See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 24.007 

(West 2000); Wilhelm v. Fed. Nat. Mortg. Ass'n, 349 S.W.3d 766, 768 (Tex. App. -

- Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, no pet.). Although appellant stated that he had 

requested that the trial judge set the bond, we find no such request in the clerk's 

record. Accordingly, the stay order issued by this Court on December 17, 2012, in 

trial court cause number CV-0068250, styled FC-1 in Trust for Morgan Stanley 

Mortgage Capital Holdings, L.L.C. v. Ben A. Cavil and all other occupants, is 

lifted. Appellee’s request for costs is denied.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison.
#### HENSLER v. STIX et al., Appellants.

Division One,

December 22, 1904.

1. APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Amount in Dispute. The amount in dispute where defendant appeals is the amount of the judgment appealed from. So that, if the judgment was for $6,250, and plaintiff files a remittitur of $2,250, and judgment is rendered for $4,000, the defendant’s appeal, unless it otherwise falls within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, is to the proper court of appeals.

2. -: Nine-Jury Law: Unanimous Verdict. Where the verdict returned was unanimous, there is no constitutional question in the case arising from the fact that the court instructed the jury that a verdict might be returned by nine of their number.

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.— *Hon. Warwick Hough,*Judge.

Transferred to St. Louis Court of Appeals.

*James'A. Seddon*and *Robert A. Holland, Jr.,t*for appellants.

*John E. Eggers*and *Hainer & Hodgdon*for respondent.

BRACE, P. J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of four thousand dollars in an action for damages for personal injuries. The plaintiff in her petition asked for damages in the sum of fifteen thousand dollars. The jury returned a verdict in her favor for the sum of six thousand two hundred and fifty dollars.

On motion for new trial she remitted the sum of - two thousand two hundred and fifty dollars, and judgment was rendered in her favor against the defendants for said sum of four thousand dollars, from which judgment the defendants appeal.

*239The amount in dispute on such appeal is the amount of the judgment appealed from (State ex rel. v. Lewis, 96 Mo. 146; Reichenbach v. U. M. Ben. Assn., 112 Mo. 22; McGregor v. Pollard, 130 Mo. 332; Douglas v. Kansas City, 147 Mo. 428), and as that amount is less than $4,500, the appeal should have gone to the St. Louis Court of Appeals, so far as the amount in dispute is concerned. [Laws 1901, p. 107.]

The verdict returned by the jury was unanimous. There is.therefore no constitutional question in the case arising from the fact that the court instructed the jury that a verdict might be returned by nine of their number. [Portwright v. St. Louis Transit Co., 183 Mo. 72.] And this being the only other ground upon which the jurisdiction of this court could be predicated, the case is manifestly within the jurisdiction of the St. Louis Court of Appeals, to which it should be transferred, and it is accordingly so ordered.

All concur, except *Robinson, J.,*absent.
News United States Air Force
 Development teams to consider officer command positionsPublished March 16, 2015
                        
                        By Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Development teams from various Air Force specialties will convene between May and August 2015 to consider eligible line and non-line officers for squadron and deputy group commander positions projected for calendar year 2016.Interested officers can go to the myPerswebsite for schedules and Airmen Development Plan statement of intent (SOI) procedures. Officers must route their SOI (if required) through their senior rater to appropriate Air Force Personnel Center assignment teams by April 17. In addition to functional command opportunities, line officers may also apply for recruiting, student, training or air base squadron command consideration.While time-on-station and date eligible for return from overseas (DEROS) are not limiting eligibility factors, they should be considered in the nomination and selection process, said Joseph Marchino, from the AFPC line special assignments branch. In general, officers serving continental U.S. or overseas long tours are expected to have two years on station prior to their projected departure date for command or be in an otherwise must-move status, such as developmental education graduates officers with a return from overseas short tour DEROS in 2016.Officers currently assigned to joint duty positions are eligible, but they must be able to complete at least 24 months of a 36-month joint duty assignment tour, preferably prior to June 1, 2016 but no later than their projected departure date, Marchino said.Officers with minimal time on station should be nominated for "fly-up" consideration only (i.e., for vacancies at current or already projected duty locations) or for deployed temporary duty command opportunities. Grade criteria vary among the different specialties, so officers are encouraged to visit their respective career field pages on the myPers website.AFPC will release results of the developmental team panels in late September 2015. Officers selected as command candidates are considered volunteers for worldwide opportunities, including extended deployment command opportunities.For more information about Air Force personnel programs go to myPers. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request by clicking here.AFPC 



commander 



squadron 



group 



FM
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 84 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D636]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
OVERSIGHT
Committee on Commerce: Subcommittee on Energy and Power continued 
oversight hearings on the Status of the International Global Climate 
Change Negotiations, focusing on the agreement reached in Berlin and 
its impact on the U.S. economy. Testimony was heard from Tim Wirth, 
Under Secretary, Global Affairs, Department of State.
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1203]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

     IN SUPPORT OF H.R. 1776: THE BLACK REVOLUTIONARY WAR PATRIOTS 
                         COMMEMORATIVE COIN ACT

                                 ______

                         HON. NANCY L. JOHNSON

                             of connecticut

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, June 8, 1995
  Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut. Mr. Speaker, yesterday I introduced, 
with my colleague Donald Payne of New Jersey, H.R. 1776, the Black 
Revolutionary War Patriots Commemorative Coin Act. This legislation 
will direct the Secretary of the Treasury to mint a special coin in 
commemoration of the many black soldiers who fought for our Nation's 
independence and our individual freedom. In addition to recognizing the 
often forgotten contributions of African-Americans during this historic 
period of our Nation's history, distribution of such a coin will enable 
the Black Patriots Foundation to succeed in funding the Black 
Revolutionary War Patriots Memorial, to be located in Constitution 
Gardens between the Washington Monument and the Lincoln Memorial.
  More than 5,000 black revolutionary war patriots fought shoulder to 
shoulder with white patriots, heroically sacrificing so that we can 
stand here today, a free people and a world leader. This contribution 
should not be forgotten. As generations of children visit our Nation's 
Capital and walk the mall, they should have a concrete reminder that we 
are descendants of men and women of all races and ethnic backgrounds 
and only together can we create a Nation in which individual social 
freedom and justice are a reality.
  I urge my colleagues to join in honoring black revolutionary war 
patriots through this commemorative coin act and enable the Black 
Patriots Foundation to complete the Black Revolutionary War Patriots 
Memorial here in Washington, DC.

                          ____________________
```