alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Michael Gismondi, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Centor, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the period  ended March 31, 2012, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/Michael GismondiName:Michael GismondiTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:July 16, 2012 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE 

MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

J.A., MOTHER OF L.A., A CHILD ,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-1347

LT Case No. 2017-DP-117

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Decision filed October 13, 2022 

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Osceola County,

Laura Shaffer, Judge.

Thomas Butler of Thomas Butler, P.A., Miami 

Beach, for Appellant. 

Kelley Schaeffer, Appellate Counsel, Children’s 

Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee. 

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of 

Appeals and Desiree Erin Fernandez, of Statewide 

Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, and Albert 

Evan Dix, of Hill Ward Henderson, P.A., Tampa, for 

Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, WOZNIAK and SASSO, JJ., concur.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FREDERICK FASICK.

February 28, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1142

EUGENE P. HARRISON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

T. BROWN, Sergeant, Detective, Taevor; ROBERT BURNISH, 

Sergeant; JERRY KELLY, Corporal; SIMON MAJOR, Sumter Lee 

Detention Center President; JON OZMINT, South Carolina 

Department of Correction,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

SUMTER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; SUMTER LEE DETENTION 

CENTER; SCDC COMMISSIONER; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTION,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (3:10-cv-02642-RMG)

Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 25, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam.
2

Eugene P. Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. James M. Davis, Jr., Joel 

Steve Hughes, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South 

Carolina, Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, 

Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Eugene P. Harrison appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See Harrison v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-02642-RMG (D.S.C. 

Jan. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-9204-2]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice; request for public comment.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with Section 122 (i) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed administrative settlement concerning the R&H Oil/Tropicana Superfund Site in San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas.

The settlement requires the settling party to pay a total of $3,586.20 as payment of response costs to the Hazardous Substances Superfund. The settlement includes a covenant not to sue pursuant to Sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607.

For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to this notice and will receive written comments relating to the settlement. The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

# DATES:

Comments must be submitted on or before October 21, 2010.

# ADDRESSES:

The proposed settlement and additional background information relating to the settlement are available for public inspection at 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. A copy of the proposed settlement may be obtained from Kevin Shade, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or by calling (214) 665-2708. Comments should reference the R&H Oil/Tropicana Superfund Site in San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, and EPA Docket Number 06-11-10, and should be addressed to Kevin Shade at the address listed above.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

I-Jung Chiang, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or call (214) 665-2160.

Dated: September 10, 2010.

Al Armendariz,

Regional Administrator, Region 6.

[FR Doc. 2010-23538 Filed 9-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
# FILED
December 2, 1996 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE SUPREME COUR T OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

JANICE HOLDER, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellee, ) ) ) Vs. ) Davidson C hancery ) ) TENNESSEE JUDICIAL ) No. 01S01-9610-CH-00211 SELECTION COMMISSION ) and GEORGE T. LEWIS, III, ESQ. ) In his Official Capacity as Chairperson ) of the Tennessee Judicial Selectio n ) Commission, ) ) Defendant/Appellee. )

ORDER
The petition to rehear is denie d.
ENTER this the 2nd day of December , 1996.

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 179 (Thursday, September 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56555-56556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Removal of Listed Property

    Pursuant to section 60.15 of 36 CFR part 60, comments are being 
accepted on the following properties being considered for removal from 
the

[[Page 56556]]

National Register of Historic Places. Comments may be forwarded by 
United States Postal Service, to the National Register of Historic 
Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., MS 2280, Washington, DC 
20240; by all other carriers, National Register of Historic Places, 
National Park Service, 1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 
20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed comments should be 
submitted by October 1, 2010.
    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

J. Paul Loether,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks 
Program.

    Request for REMOVAL has been made for the following resource:

INDIANA

Brown County

Grandview Church, Grandview Ridge Rd. SE of New Bellsville, New 
Bellsville, 91001160

[FR Doc. 2010-23174 Filed 9-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-51-P
**EXHIBIT
        32**
 **Certification
        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 **(Subsections
        (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
        Code)**
 
 Pursuant
        to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
        of
        section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
        undersigned officers of Kings Road Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation
        (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
        that:
 
 The
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended October 31,
        2006
        (the "Form 10-QSB/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
        of
        section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
        contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
        financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Kings Road Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by Kings Road Entertainment,
        Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon
        request.
  Dated:
        July 23, 2008
 
 /s/
        Philip Holmes
 Philip
        Holmes
 President
 
 /s/
        Robert Kainz
 Robert
        Kainz
 Chief
        Financial Officer
422 A.2d 1175

#### Commonwealth v. Myrick, Appellant.

*644Submitted September 15, 1978.

Malcolm M. Limongelli, First Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Patrick J. Toole, Jr., District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, HESTER and HOFFMAN, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 17 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States establishing 

English as the official language of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 17, 2007 

Mr. DOOLITTLE introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States establishing English as the official language of 

the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 17 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The English language shall be the offi3 cial language of the United States and shall be used for 

4 all public acts, including every order, resolution, vote, or 

5 election, and for all records and judicial proceedings of 

6 the Government of the United States and the governments 

7 of the several States. 

8 ‘‘SEC. 2. The Congress and the States shall have 

9 power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.01




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Tom Hofer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Vendalux Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Vendalux Corporation.

By:            /s/
   ------------------------------
Name: Tom Hofer
Title:   Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5231]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE

  A message from the Senate by Mr. Lundregan, one of its clerks, 
announced that the Senate had passed without amendment a bill of the 
House of the following title:

       H.R. 483. An act to amend title XVIII of the Social 
     Security Act to permit medicare select policies to be offered 
     in all States, and for other purposes.

  The message also announced that the Senate had passed bills of the 
following titles, in which the concurrence of the House is requested:

       S. 395. An act to authorize and direct the Secretary of 
     Energy to sell the Alaska Power Administration, and to 
     authorize the export of Alaska North Slope crude oil, and for 
     other purposes; and
       S. 534. An act to amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to 
     provide authority for States to limit the interstate 
     transportation of municipal solid waste, and for other 
     purposes.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 Van Ovost nominated to be next AMC commanderPublished June 11, 2020
                        
                        By Air Mobility Command Public Affairs
                **SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, Ill. (AFNS) --**
                As **Gen. Maryanne Miller**, **Air Mobility Command** commander, prepares to retire after a 39-year career, **Lt. Gen. Jacqueline Van Ovost**, AMC deputy commander, has been nominated as her successor.
Van Ovost and Miller marked the first time in history that an Air Force major command has been led by both a female commander and deputy. If confirmed, Van Ovost will pin on her fourth star, assume command of AMC, and, upon Miller’s retirement, become the highest-ranking female in the United States military.
“I am honored and humbled by the nomination to serve as the next commander of Air Mobility Command,” Van Ovost said. “I look forward to the opportunity to build upon the incredible work of Gen. Maryanne Miller and the commanders who served before her, ensuring the success of the air mobility enterprise and its people who make up the heart of our global reach mission every day.”
Van Ovost has led at all levels of the Air Force and her technical expertise as a pilot ranges from heavy airlift aircraft to nimble fighter jets. She began her Air Force career flying the C-141 Starlifter, became a test pilot and subsequently flew over 30 different aircraft, accumulating more than 4,200 flight hours.
She commanded a refueling squadron at **McConnell AFB**, Kansas, served as vice commander of the **U.S. Air Force Expeditionary Center** and commanded the 89th Airlift Wing at **Joint Base Andrews**, Maryland, responsible for one of the Air Force’s no-fail missions: safely transporting the president and our nation’s most senior leaders.
“I have no doubt Lt. Gen. Jacqueline Van Ovost will be an extraordinary leader for our Mobility Airmen,” Miller said. “She has served exceptionally, most recently in direct support of our Air Force chief of staff and secretary, and I am excited for the future of AMC with her at the helm.”
Van Ovost is nominated to offer her broad leadership and expertise to AMC during an unprecedented time in our nation’s history. AMC provides rapid global mobility every day, no matter the circumstances, and is at the forefront of the DoD’s effort to support American and global needs in the ongoing **COVID-19** pandemic, moving patients, delivering life-saving supplies and developing new technologies to execute the mission safely.AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Air Mobility Command 



AMC 



Air Force Major Command 



commander 



history 



Lt. Gen. Jacqueline Van Ovost 



AMC Commander 



C-141 Starlifter 



McConnell AFB 



Joint Base Andrews 



Global Reach 



U.S. Air Force Expeditionary Center 



Rapid Global Mobility 



Women in Leadership 



leaders 



women aviator
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 78o(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: June 27, 2007
    /s/ Theodore AbajianTheodore AbajianExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7381

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee,

v.

SHANNON DERRELL WILLIAMS, a/k/a Doe,

Petitioner - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior

District Judge. (3:02-cr-00085-JRS-1)

Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shannon Derrell Williams, Appellant Pro Se. David Thomas 

Maguire, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shannon Derrell Williams seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order construing his petition for a writ of audita 

querela as a successive and unauthorized 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The district court’s order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000919602
<NAME> HELSINKI CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          481
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,727)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  45
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (45)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (45)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (45)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GEORGE SHROPSHIRE.

January 23, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.