alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1098-E1099]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    SETTING INTERNATIONAL PRIORITIES

                                 ______

                            HON. RON PACKARD

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 23, 1995
  Mr. PACKARD. Mr. Speaker, the bill before us provides an opportunity 
to reorder our international priorities and put our fiscal house in 
order. This bill represents the first major reform in overseas 
operations in 50 years by slashing $1.8 billion from the President's 
1996 fiscal year request.
  This bill eliminates AID, USIA, and ACDA, three bloated and 
inefficient agencies and [[Page E1099]] consolidates their relevant 
functions within the State Department. This $200 million reduction in 
operating expenses abolishes duplicative legislative, legal, and 
administrative personnel. In addition, with the savings derived from 
the ending these wasteful programs, we are able to fully fund narcotics 
control, antiterrorism, and security programs.
  Streamlining the foreign aid bureaucracy and prioritizing our 
commitments abroad allows us to continue our deficit slashing agenda. 
The bill moves us closer to that goal and represents a step in the 
right direction. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to keep our 
budgetary goals in mind as we continue to debate and fine tune this 
bill.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6471-S6472]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        THE BUDGET AND MEDICARE

  Mr. THOMAS. Mr. President, I am very anxious that we proceed with the 
bill before us. In the meantime, I would like to just for a moment or 
two continue on our freshman focus on the idea of moving forward with 
these issues that are before the Senate and the House and that do need 
to be resolved soon, and to emphasize the opportunity that we have to 
solve them. Specifically, of course, to the budget and more 
specifically Medicare.
  We have talked about Medicare for a good deal of time over the past, 
but now we come to a time when there is no choice as to whether we have 
to make a decision or whether we do not. We have before us a report 
from the trustees, of course, which indicates that unless we do 
something the fund will be broke in probably 3 years. So it is not a 
matter of not doing something. It is a matter of what do we do.
  I am disappointed, I must say, that the administration has taken the 
position that we are just going to wait; we are just going to see what 
happens; we 
[[Page S6472]] tried last year; our plan was not acceptable; and 
therefore we are not going to do anything.
  That is not a strong leadership position. That is not a position that 
the administration should take. Nevertheless, the issue has to be dealt 
with. We propose to deal with it. The budget will suggest that in terms 
of part A the remedy might be found in the area of reducing growth--not 
cuts, not draconian cuts but, rather, reducing the growth from 10 
percent to 7 percent, 8 percent,
 and that we can do this by changing some of the processes.

  I think that this is the important thing that we have to talk about; 
that there ought to be some choices for seniors; that we ought to have 
some opportunities to use managed care; that there ought to be some 
incentives for people to find better ways of receiving services.
  But the idea that we can simply sit back and continue to do what it 
is--the suggestion was made yesterday, if we can do something with the 
budget, we simply ought to take more money and put it into the program 
without changing.
  Mr. President, that is not a useful solution. We have to find some 
ways to make the program work better. It seems to me that that is the 
great opportunity that we have had in this Congress for the first time 
in a number of years, to examine programs; not to do away with 
programs, but to find ways to deliver services more efficiently, to 
find ways, better ways, to deliver services to people who are eligible 
for those services. That is the challenge that we have.
  Mr. President, I yield to my colleague, the Senator from Tennessee.
  Mr. THOMPSON addressed the Chair.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Chair recognizes the Senator from 
Tennessee.

                          ____________________
```
September 7, 1979.

422 A.2d 1163

#### Commonwealth v. Coley, Appellant.

Submitted September 15, 1978.

Vincent T. Snyder, for appellant; Edward G. Rendell, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before VAN der VOORT, WATKINS and MONTGOMERY, JJ.

Order affirmed.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HERBERT T. JONES.

March 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of American Soil Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Carl P. Ranno, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Ken
Lew, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Carl P. Ranno                                    /s/ Ken Lew
------------------------------------                 --------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and President                Chief Financial Officer
March 29, 2004                                       March 29, 2004
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40335

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID WAYNE McCLOY,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(4:00-CR-57-ALL)

-------------------- July 17, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant David Wayne McCloy appeals the sentence

imposed by the district court following his guilty-plea conviction

f or possession of stolen United States mail. He argues that the

district court erred in increasi ng his offense level by three

levels pursuant to United States Sentence Guideline § 3A1.2(b). He

contends that he was merely attempting to flee and that his actions

did not rise to the level of an assault that created a substantial

risk of serious bodily injury. We disagree. McCloy’s actions didamount to an aggravated assault on Officer A.L. Privett, given

McCloy’s attempt to flee immediately after committing the instant

o ffense and his attempt to take Officer Privett’s firearm during

this altercation. Therefore, the district court did not err in

increasing his offense level pursuant to § 3A1.2(b). S ee United

States v. Ortiz-Granados , 12 F.3d 39, 41-43 (5th Cir. 1994).

McCloy argues that the district court abused its discretion in

departing upward from the applicable Sentencing Guideline range in

determining his sentence. The district court concluded that an

upward departure was warranted because McCloy had more than twice

the number of criminal history points necessary for a Category VI,

had violated the conditions of his community release follow ing

several convictions, had committed crimes on a frequent basis, and

had committed the instant offense less than one year after his

release from the Arkansas Department of Corrections. As the

district court gave acceptable reasons for the upward departure and

the extent of the upward dep arture was reasonable, the district

court did not abuse its discretion in departing upward in

determining McCloy’s sentence. S ee Uni ted States v. Route , 104

F.3d 59, 64 (5th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RENAL CARE GROUP, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          21,292
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  101,498
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,673
<PP&E>                                         124,937
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 490,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,079
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           451
<OTHER-SE>                                     328,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   490,842
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,297
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,140
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,734
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,949
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,283
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,229
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,054
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,054
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.02

                                   Certification

I, Tom Hofer, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Vendalux
Corporation

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report(the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors ( or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls'
and

Date: August 28, 2003

By: /s/
   --------------------------------
   Tom Hofer
   (Chief Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23803]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12266 and <greek-i>12267]


Texas Disaster Number TX-00361

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Texas (FEMA-1931-DR), dated 08/03/2010.
    Incident: Hurricane Alex.
    Incident Period: 06/30/2010 through 08/14/2010.
    Effective Date: 09/16/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/04/2010.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/03/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of Texas, dated 08/03/2010 is hereby amended 
to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):
    Lubbock.
Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Texas: Crosby, Floyd, Garza, Hale, Hockley, Lamb, Lynn, Terry.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-23803 Filed 9-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
583 A.2d 336

#### RALPH ESPOSITO v. FREEMONT CORPORATION AND MARKS, HOLLAND & CASAGRANDE.

March 7, 1990.

Cross-Petition for certification denied.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D2023-1509

Lower Tribunal No. 2019-CF-013484-A-O

_____________________________

KAMAL EDWARDS,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Chad K. Alvaro, Judge.

August 27, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and MIZE and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Brett S. Chase, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R. Putnam, Jr., 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 9/30/96 FORM
10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000919626
<NAME> GOLD CAPITAL CORP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           7,338
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      12,539,364
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,128,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,406,362
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,000
<COMMON>                                           697
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,148,004
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,128,277
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  396,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               687,199
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             181,774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,265,743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,265,743)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,265,743)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)
        

</TABLE>
583 A.2d 312

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HASSAN BOLDEN.

January 23, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Brothers jump together for first timePublished May 23, 2014
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Michael Stuart
                        
                        
                        86th Airlift Wing
                **RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany (AFNS) --**
                In southwest Germany, half way across the world from where they grew up, two brothers had the opportunity of a lifetime.
International Jump Week is a five day event, held on Ramstein Air Base and Alzey drop zone, that allows paratroopers from nine different nations the opportunity to build camaraderie amongst each other and learn one another's tactics. Tech. Sgt. Brian Angell, 435th Contingency Response Group personnel parachute program manager, was the event coordinator.
"It was my job to bring all of the partner nations together for this event, plan how we're going to set up all of the equipment and line up the aircraft for transport," said Angell.
With IJW being an event that parachutists from around the world attend, Master Sgt. Kevin Angell, Special Operations Command Korea, NCO in charge of communications directorate and Brian's older brother, decided to join his brother. He flew out from Korea and the two jumped together for the first time.
"I got to do the entire air operation with him, exit right before him and meet up with him in the drop zone afterward," said Kevin Angell, "It was a great jump."
Not only was Brian Angell the event coordinator, he was the drop zone safety officer. The job of the DZSO is to ensure the air operations are safe, winds are tolerable and check to see if all of the equipment is set up.
"Knowing my brother was on the ground doing his job, I had complete confidence that when I exited the plane, everything was going to be done right," said Brian Angell.
Not only did the brothers have the support of each other, but they also had their father, Sam Angell, a retired, Air Force master sergeant, visiting from Florida to watch them jump.
"What's special for me is that I was able to do this entire airborne op (operations) with him throughout the week and then today I was able to go out right in front of him and have him follow me out," said Kevin Angell. "We were also able to have our father out here to watch us land and walk off together making it a very special day for the entire family."brothers 



parachute 



Ramstein Air Base 



Germany 



international jump week
#### MICHAEL CHRISTY v. CITY OF NEWARK.

January 17, 1984.

Petition for certification granted.
580 A.2d 1085

#### IN THE MATTER OF HOWARD PITT, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 23, 1990.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that HOWARD PITT of GREENWOOD *399LAKE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, be publicly reprimanded for failing to maintain a *bona fide*office for the practice of law, in violation of *Rule*1:21-1(a) and *RPC*5.5(a) and for failing to cooperate with this ethics investigation, in violation of *RPC*8.1, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review are adopted, and HOWARD PITT is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it. is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics. Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.