alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.5

                         FOX & COMPANY INVESTMENTS, INC.
                             6232 NORTH 32ND STREET
                             PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85018


                               September 23, 1997


Soy Environmental Products, Inc.
9135 Barton Street
Overland Park, Kansas  66214


         Re:      Engagement  Agreement  Effective June 27, 1997/Note  Agreement
                  Effective  July 3,  1997/Class A Warrant  Agreement  Effective
                  July 3, 1997/Class B Warrant Agreement Effective July 3, 1997

Gentlemen:

         This  letter  will  serve  as  a   supplement   and   addendum  to  the
above-referenced agreement (the "Agreement").  Fox & Company Investments,  Inc.,
as placement agent (the "Placement Agent"), and Soy Environmental Products, Inc.
(the  "Company")  hereby  agree  to  extend  the  term of the  Offering  through
September  23, 1997 and to increase the total amount of the Offering to $770,000
($924,000  of Notes  and  924,000  Warrants).  The Note  Agreement,  the Class A
Warrant  Agreement  and Class B Warrant  Agreement  are also  hereby  amended to
reflect the increased total amount of the Offering.

         All  remaining  terms  and  conditions  of  the  Agreement,   the  Note
Agreement,  the Class A  Warrant  Agreement  and the  Class B Warrant  Agreement
remain in full force and effect.

         The  Placement  Agent  shall be  responsible  for  notifying  all prior
investors  of the  change of terms.  The  Company  will be  responsible  for the
preparation and filing of all applicable  Securities and Exchange Commission and
state blue sky notices as required  with respect to the  extension and expansion
of the offering and the closing as contemplated to occur on the date hereof.

         If the above is in accordance with your understanding,  please indicate
the same by executing below.

                                   Very truly yours,

                                   FOX & COMPANY INVESTMENTS, INC.


                                   By   /s/ Thomas A. Cifelli
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Thomas A. Cifelli, Executive Vice President

Accepted:

SOY ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCTS, INC.


By   /s/ Sean F. Lee
  ------------------------------------------
  Sean F. Lee, Chief Executive Officer
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1148

(Serial No. 07/925,450)

IN RE JUNG J. LEE

Clifford D. Hyra , The Law Office of James C. Wr ay, of McLean, Virginia, argued

for appellant. With him on the brief was James C. Wray

.

Shannon M. Hansen , Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States

Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United

States Patent and Trademark Office . With her on the brief was Thomas L. Stoll

, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel was Sydney O. Johnson , Acting Solicitor.

Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office

Board of Patent Appeals and InterferencesNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1148

(Serial No. 07/925,450)

IN RE JUNG J. LEE



# Judgment

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

In CASE NO(S). 07/925,450.

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam: (MAYER, LOURIE and PROST, Circuit Judges ):

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATE: August 7, 2008 / s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of Meade Instruments Corp., a Delaware corporation
 Name of Subsidiary
    
    JurisdictionMeade Instruments Holding Corp.
    
    CaliforniaMeade Instruments Mexico, S. de R. L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoMeade Coronado Holdings Corp.
    
    CaliforniaCoronado Instruments, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaMTSC Holdings, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaSimmons Outdoor Corp.
    
    DelawareMC Holdings, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaMeade Instruments (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaMeade Instruments Europe Corp.
    
    CaliforniaMeade.com
    
    CaliforniaMeade Instruments Foreign Sales Corporation Limited
    
    Jamaica
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1191 

To authorize the National Park Service to pay for services rendered by 

subcontractors under a General Services Administration Indefinite Deliver/Indefinite Quantity Contract issued for work to be completed at 

the Grand Canyon National Park. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2007 

Mr. RENZI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the National Park Service to pay for services 

rendered by subcontractors under a General Services Administration Indefinite Deliver/Indefinite Quantity Contract issued for work to be completed at the Grand 

Canyon National Park. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. 

4 As used in this Act, the following definitions apply: 

5 (1) IDIQ.—The term ‘‘IDIQ’’ means an Indefi6 nite Deliver/Indefinite Quantity contract. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 1191 IH

1 (2) PARK.—The term ‘‘park’’ means Grand 

2 Canyon National Park. 

3 (3) PGI.—The term ‘‘PGI’’ means Pacific Gen4 eral, Inc. 

5 (4) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

6 the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Di7 rector of the National Park Service. 

8 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION. 

9 The Secretary is authorized to pay the amount owed 

10 to the subcontractors of PGI for work performed at the 

11 park under an IDIQ with PGI between fiscal years 2002 

12 and 2003 provided that— 

13 (1) the primary contract between PGI and the 

14 National Park Service is terminated; 

15 (2) the amount owed to the subcontractors is 

16 verified; 

17 (3) all reasonable legal avenues or recourse 

18 have been exhausted by the subcontractors to recoup 

19 amounts owed directly from PGI; and 

20 (4) the subcontractors provide a written state21 ment that payment of the amount verified in para22 graph (2) represents payment in full by the United 

23 States for all work performed at the park under the 

24 IDIQ with PGI between fiscal years 2002 and 2003. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Three Months Ended
                                           March 25, 1998        March 25, 1997
                                           --------------        --------------
<S>                                        <C>                   <C>        
   Net Income                              $ 7,651,000           $ 7,242,000


   Shares used to compute
      earnings per share - Basic            19,269,244            19,222,200


   Earnings Per Share - Basic                    $0.40                 $0.38



   Shares used to compute
      earnings per share including
      common stock equivalents - Diluted    19,399,576            19,381,039

   Earnings Per Share - Diluted                  $0.39                 $0.37
</TABLE>





<PAGE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 10653

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,
P laintiff

- Appell ee

v.
TORRI DLENA ANDERSON , Defendant

- Appell ant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:14

- CV

- 453

Before OWEN, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Torri Dlena Anderson, federal prisoner # 45585

- 177, was convicted of conspiracy to produce false identification documents and sentenced to 180 months of imprisonment. On July 1, 2015, she filed a motion to obtain relief pursuant to Alleyne v. United State s , 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013) . The district court denied the motion noting that Anderson had raised an Alleyne claim in her original 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and that she needed to obtain authorization from this court to file a successive § 2255 motion. Ander son now moves this

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 25, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-10653 Document: 00513732552 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2016No. 15

- 10653

2 court for a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s denial of her postjudgment motion. She has also filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. A COA is required to appeal the denial of an unauthorized succ essive § 225 5 motion. See Cardenas v. Thaler , 651 F.3d 442, 443 (5th Cir. 2011). The
district court did not determine whether Anderson was entitled to a COA. Because the district court has not issued a COA ruling, we assume without deciding that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. See Rule 11(a), Rules Governing § 225 5 Proceedings ; Cardenas , 651 F.3d at 444 & nn.1

- 2. Nevertheless, we decline to remand this case to the district court for a COA ruling because a remand would be futile. See United States v. Alvarez , 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000). Anderson’s postjudgment motion was properly
construed as an unauthorized successive § 225 5 motion. See Gonzalez v. Crosby , 545 U.S. 524, 53 1

- 32 (2005) ; United States v. Hernandes , 708 F.3d 680, 681 (5 th Cir. 2013) . Because the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider Anderson’s postjudgment motion, we lack jurisdiction to review the denial of
that motion on the merits. See United States v. Key , 205 F.3d 773, 774

- 75 (5th Cir. 2000). According ly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, and Anderson’s motion s for a COA and the appointment of counsel are DENIED AS MOOT. Case: 15-10653 Document: 00513732552 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2016
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Civilian Development Nomination Window opens Jan. 10  

              - Published  Jan. 8, 2024
              - Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs

**ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --  **
Civilian employees in the grades of GS-07 through GS-15 (and equivalents) may apply for more than 40 civilian development (CD) opportunities including professional military education, academic programs, fellowships, experiential assignments and leadership seminars starting Jan. 10.  

CD programs support the DAF’s “Civilians We Need” dual-track career model, which distinguishes paths for both enterprise leaders and functional experts. Developing civilians throughout their careers also strengthens the force we need to meet today’s high-end challenges.  

The CD programs include both short and long-term training and experiential assignments. Opportunities range from two days to three years in length; some are offered through virtual delivery platforms and others are delivered in person.  

“The civilian workforce is a critical element to ensuring we prevail in great power competition and win any future fight.  Our diverse and expansive civilian development portfolio offers growth opportunities for all civilians throughout their career journey,” said Director of Force Development Crystal Moore.  “Whether a civilian aspires to enterprise leadership or functional expertise; serves as supervisor or non-supervisor; is mobile or is not mobile, there is something to help grow their skills and competencies.” 

The development and leadership programs offered through CD are mapped to the Department of the Air Force’s foundational competencies, which are key to ensuring civilian Airmen and Guardians can operate successfully in a rapidly changing environment. These competencies span all occupations, functions, and organizational levels and support the development of current and future DAF leaders.  

DAF civilians may apply for up to four programs by submitting their applications, resumes, and additional program-required documents through **MyVector**. Applicants must self-nominate no later than Feb. 16, although local organizations may establish deadlines as early as Feb. 9. The application must flow through the chain of command and be endorsed in MyVector by March 8.  

Visit the myFSS **Civilian Force Development home page** to learn more about specific opportunities and to view the AY25 webcast recordings. For additional information and notifications, join the **Official AY25 CD Nomination Call Teams channel**, using code “dc4689p.” U.S. Air Force Logo

 

FSUSAFAFAir Forcespace forceCivilian Development Nominationprofessional military educationacademic programsfellowshipsexperiential assignmentsleadership seminars“Civilians We Need”MyVector
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Brandon Paree Christopher

Appellate case number: 01-20-00170-CV

Trial court case number: 200618875

Trial court: 309th District Court of Harris County

This Court issued an order on February 25, 2020 striking relator’s brief. We withdraw the

order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Russell Lloyd__________________

Acting individually

Date: March 24, 2020
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the quarterly report of Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Harry  M.  Neer,  Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Harry M. Neer
-------------------------------------
Harry M. Neer,
Chief Executive Officer and President
June 30, 2004


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. and will be retained by
Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
#### W. J. Garrett et al. v. L. B. Gay et al.

(No. 730, Op. Book No. 2, p. 247.)

Eeeoe from Collin County.

March 9, 1881.

Opinion by

Walker, R. S., P. J.

§ 1026. *Appeal bond from justice's court.*On appeal from justice’s court to county court no appeal bond was given by appellants in the court below, but the following entry appeared upon the transcript sent up to the county court by the justice, viz.: “ On this 18th day of August, 1877, comes H. H. Belard and Charles Dobbs, and acknowledge themselves bound with the defendants Ed and Lem Gay for all costs that may be adjudged against them in case they fail to prosecute this suit to effect. Approved, W. H. Brunmett, J. P. C. C., Tex.” Appellees in the court below moved to dismiss the appeal because there was no appeal bond. The court overruled the motion, and permitted an appeal bond to be filed. Held, 1. The above quoted entry upon the justice’s docket did not constitute an appeal bond. Such an entry is not equivalent to a bond, nor is it in any proper sense “ a bond filed with the justice,” as required by law. 2. As an appeal bond it was fatally defective, and could not be supplied by a new bond so as to confer jurisdiction on the county court. [King v. Hopkins, 42 Tex. 48; Berry v. Martin, 6 Tex. 264.]

Reversed and dismissed.
News United States Air Force
 F-22s deploy to Europe to show support for alliesPublished April 12, 2016
                        
                        By U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa Public Affairs
                **RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany (AFNS)  --**
                F-22 Raptors, Airmen and associated equipment were deployed to Royal Air Force Lakenheath, England, on April 11 to conduct air training with other Europe-based aircraft.The F-22s come from the 95th Fighter Squadron at Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, and will continue training until May."This F-22 training deployment is the perfect opportunity for these advanced aircraft to train alongside other U.S. Air Force aircraft, joint partners and NATO allies," said Gen. Frank Gorenc, the commander of U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa.The fifth-generation, multirole fighter aircraft will also forward deploy from the U.K. to NATO bases to maximize training opportunities, affirm enduring commitments to NATO allies, and deter any actions that destabilize regional security.The training marks the second time the U.S. European Command has hosted a deployment of F-22s in its area of responsibility."It's important we test our infrastructure, aircraft capabilities, and the talented Airmen and allies who will host these aircraft in Europe," Gorenc said. "This deployment advances our airpower evolution and demonstrates our resolve and commitment to European safety and security."F-22 



RAF Lakenheath 



USAFE 



training 



Europe
News United States Air Force
 AF Community Partnership Program signs 100th partnering agreementPublished July 14, 2015
                        
                        
                        Air Force Community Partnership Team
                **ALASKA (AFNS) --**
                Eielson Air Force Base and Fairbanks community leaders recently signed the 100th Air Force Community Partnership (AFCP) Program partnership agreement.  
Leaders from the 354th Fighter Wing and the surrounding community inked a memorandum of understanding May 28 for a partnership initiative that helps align military dependents with potential teaching opportunities. 
"I'm grateful we were able to sign a few agreements with the community already," said Col. Michael Winkler, the 354th Fighter Wing commander. "The Fairbanks North Star Borough is an amazing community with unparalleled military support.”
The Fairbanks North Star Borough School Board had approximately 165 positions for teachers, substitute teachers, aides and tutors they were unable to fill. It was estimated nearly 30 of those positions could be filled by military dependents within the local area. Through this initiative, local schools in need of qualified staff are now able to reach out to new families at Eielson AFB to fill education positions within the Fairbanks North Star Borough School District.  
“This is just the start of things," said Luke Hopkins, the Fairbanks North Star Borough mayor. "We will continue to work with our partners and share what resources we can." 
A newcomers’ information session is hosted monthly by the Eielson AFB Airman and Family Readiness Center to help tap into this valuable resource. School district representatives attend these sessions to discuss potential job opportunities. New hires can obtain the necessary training, so they are ready to work soon after arriving in the base community. 
This is one of many initiatives the AFCP team is currently working between 50 installations and their local community leaders as part of an overall Air Force effort to improve and strengthen community and Air Force partnerships.   
“We set the framework that provides trained teams to installations and their surrounding communities,” said Steve Zander, the AFCP Program director. “The greatest results are achieved when installation and community leaders embrace the concept of partnering and use the Air Force’s well-structured process as a means to achieve mutual value and benefit.”
In its third year, the program has matured in guiding installations and communities to identify partnership opportunities across the spectrum of installation services and mission support. More than 1,000 initiatives have been identified to date, and the results are proving successful. These partnerships are identifying new and innovative ways of supporting Airmen and their families.Alaska 



Air Force Community Partnership Program 



community 



PACAF 



Eielson AFB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM NOVA INTERNATIONAL FILMS, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED JULY 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                          4,979
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                4,979 
<PP&E>                          0 
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,300
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        736
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4,979
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,647
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (2,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (2,647)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (2,647)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (.000)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.000)



</TABLE>