alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18            U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS            ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trans Energy, Inc. (the            “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with            the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),            I, Lisa A. Corbitt, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to            18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,            that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of                            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                            and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,                            in all material respects, the financial condition and result of                            operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

/S/ LISA A. CORBITT

Lisa            A. Corbitt

Principal Accounting Officer

May            15,2008

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or            other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that            appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been            provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the            Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing            certifications are accompanying the Company’s Form 10-Q solely pursuant to            section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,            chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form            10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Microbics, Inc., (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Conrad
Nagel, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                             /S/CONRAD NAGEL
                                             ---------------
                                             Conrad Nagel

                                             Principal Accounting Officer
                                             February 23, 2004


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7441

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL ANTONIO GALLOWAY, a/k/a Yoda,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cr-00309-WO-1; 1:09-cv-00298-WO-PTS)

Submitted: January 31, 2011 Decided: February 24, 2011

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Antonio Galloway, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane 

Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Antonio Galloway seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Galloway has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________ NO. 09
- 13
- 00408
- CR

________________ ERNEST JOE BILNOSKI , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________________ __________________________ On Appeal from the 221st District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 13
- 07
- 07790 CR

________________________________________ __________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION A jury found appellant Ernest Joe Bilnoski guilty of arson as a habitual felony offender and assessed punishment at forty

- five years of imprisonment.
Bilnoski ’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional
evaluation of the record a nd concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W. 2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
Bilnoski filed a pro se brief in response. The Court of Criminal Appeals hasheld that we need not address the merit s of issues raised in Anders briefs or pro se
responses. Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

- 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Rather, an appellate court may determine either: (1) “that the appeal is wholly frivolous and issue an opinion explaining that it has reviewed the record and finds no reversible error”; or (2) “that arguable grounds for appeal exist and remand the

cause t o the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to brief the issues. ”
Id

. W e have reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel’s conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. See id

. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order app ointment of new counsel to re

- brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment. 1

AFFIRMED.

________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN Chief Justice Submitted on August 22 , 20 14 Opinion Delivered September 17, 2014 Do Not Publish
B efore McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

1 Bilnoski may challenge our decision in th is case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1019 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 764
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1019

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2007

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                              June 4, 2008

               Reported by Mrs. Boxer, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the United States customhouse building located at 31 
  Gonzalez Clemente Avenue in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, as the ``Rafael 
          Martinez Nadal United States Customhouse Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States customhouse building located at 31 Gonzalez 
Clemente Avenue in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Rafael Martinez Nadal United States Customhouse Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States customhouse building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Rafael Martinez Nadal United States Customhouse Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 764

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1019

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To designate the United States customhouse building located at 31 
  Gonzalez Clemente Avenue in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, as the ``Rafael 
          Martinez Nadal United States Customhouse Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 4, 2008

                       Reported without amendment
```
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)**





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Kings Road Entertainment, Inc., a Nevada corporation
      (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
      that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A - 1 for the fiscal quarter ended January
      31,
      2005 (the "Form 10-QSB/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
      contained in the Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Kings Road Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by Kings Road Entertainment,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




Dated:
      June 30, 2008





/s/
                Philip HolmesPhilip
                HolmesPresident/s/
                Robert KainzRobert
                KainzChief
                Financial Officer
News United States Air Force
 Air Force releases latest field grade officer promotionsPublished Dec. 28, 2023
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force selected 519 active-duty officers for promotion to lieutenant colonel and major during recent CY23A central selection boards. In total, the Air Force selected 173 majors for promotion to lieutenant colonel (Medical and Dental Corps) and 346 captains for promotion to major (Medical and Dental Corps). Lieutenant Colonel (M0523A) selection statistics: Medical Corps: 143 selected out of 167 considered Dental Corps: 30 selected out of 40 consideredMajor (M0423A) selection statistics: Medical Corps: 303 selected out of 356 considered Dental Corps: 43 selected out of 51 consideredThe complete list of Airmen selected for promotion is available online by visiting AFPC’s **Officer Promotion**website. For more information about Air Force personnel programs, visit the **AFPC public website**.Officer board 



officer personnel news 



officer promotion 



Officer Promotion Cycle 



officer promotion board 



officer promotions 



LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



AFPC 



Air Force Personnel Center 



field grade 



officer 



promotion 



major 



lieutenant colonel 



FGO
Schedule of Change in Control and Severance Agreements



 EXHIBIT 10(a)(6) 
  
 SCHEDULE OF CHANGE IN CONTROL AND SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS 
  
 Patrick D. Henneberry 
 Lee Van Syckle

 Darrell D. Swank 
 T. Kay Hastings
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5682]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                               ON BOSNIA

  (Mr. HOYER asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Mr. HOYER. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from New York, the 
chairman of the committee. As the Members of this House know, I, along 
with the gentleman from New York [Mr. Gilman] and others, offered an 
amendment last year that dealt with lifting the arms embargo to allow 
the Bosnians to defend themselves. This situation has gone on now for 
almost 3 years. The largest number of refugees since the Second World 
War have been created as a result of this confrontation and over 
100,000 deaths. Genocide is occurring.
  I regret that it appears, based upon the schedule that is going 
forward now, that I will be precluded from offering this amendment, 
which I believe is critically timely today and will be critically 
timely tomorrow.
  I would hope that we could configure the schedule tomorrow so that I 
would have a half an hour to offer this amendment at the end of the 
other amendments so that this House can address this issue. It is 
critical. It is on the front page of every newspaper in Europe and the 
United States. It is in the councils of the armed forces of every NATO 
nation. And it seems to me it is timely now for this Congress to speak.

                          ____________________
```
#### DAAG STAADT CORP. v. TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN.

March 27, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Tech Report: CV-22 OspreyPublished Aug. 24, 2016
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Nicholas Koetz
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                 **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- The CV-22 Osprey is a tiltrotor aircraft that combines the vertical takeoff, hover and vertical landing qualities of a helicopter with the long-range, fuel efficiency and speed characteristics of a turboprop aircraft. Its mission is to conduct long-range infiltration, exfiltration and resupply missions for special operations forces.
The Air Force Tech Report is a video series that gives viewers a quick look at current technology the Air Force uses to fly, fight and win.CV-22 



special forces 



AFSOC 



Tech Report
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5625]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              THE JOURNAL

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair has examined the Journal of the 
last day's proceedings and announces to the House his approval thereof.
  Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Journal stands approved.

                          ____________________
```
422 A.2d 1168

#### Commonwealth v. Woodell, Appellant.

Argued March 19, 1979.

John M. Smith, for appellant; E. Browne, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, fot Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, SPAETH and LIPEZ, JJ.

Order affirmed.

SPAETH, J., concurred in the result.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,857
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,857
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              709
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,857
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,989)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,989)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      28,256,221
<SECURITIES>                                 1,195,990
<RECEIVABLES>                              198,469,119
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           238,985,423
<PP&E>                                      44,464,414
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             650,435,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      197,590,731
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        68,873
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 142,425,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               650,435,248
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           240,622,434
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              169,483,677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            49,379,311
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (5,159,645)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,599,801
<INCOME-TAX>                                (5,941,059)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,658,742
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                           DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-25-1998
<CASH>                                         4,894
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 98,838
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  107,527
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             218,352
<PP&E>                                       189,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               456,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         99,953
<BONDS>                                        9,567
<COMMON>                                     312,316
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 456,341
<SALES>                                      362,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             362,018
<CGS>                                        229,730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                318,087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               37,309
<INCOME-TAX>                                  12,841
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           24,468
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  24,468
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.26
        




</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALBERT SAWYER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 270 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of November, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

and “Motion for Plea Agreements made by the Commonwealth” are DENIED.