alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          49,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,205,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,127,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,055,000
<PP&E>                                      44,256,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,606,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,649,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       25,871,000
<BONDS>                                      7,038,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,958,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,649,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,667,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,484,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,157,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               969,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             591,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,164,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   102,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,062,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,062,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23


</TABLE>
EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO


Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334



ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
dated as of August 1, 2011, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving
Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master
Servicer, Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, NA, as a Pooled
Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Providence Place
Mall Loan Special Servicer, U.S. Bank, National Association, as Trustee,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Paying
Agent and Custodian, and Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating
Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series
DBUBS 2011-LC3 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from
August 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011, and of its performance per the
Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer,
has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
respects throughout the period August 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the
12th day of March 2012.

/s/Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
(logo) Together we'll go far
763 A.2d 359

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Diane R. JEPSEN, Respondent.

No. 633 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Nov. 17, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2000, there having been filed with this Court by Diane R. Jepsen her verified Statement of Resignation dated October 5, 2000, stating that she desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Diane R. Jepsen be and it is hereby accepted and she is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further ORDERED that she shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
No. 87-1444.

#### Gendron et al. *v.*Pan American World Airways, Inc.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Franklin Street Properties
Corp. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, John G. Demeritt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.

Date: February 23, 2007              /s/ John G. Demeritt
                                     -----------------------
                                     John G. Demeritt
                                     Chief Financial Officer
News United States Air Force
 Vanguard award nominations due Jan. 28Published Dec. 16, 2013
                        
                        By Gloria Kwizera
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Nominations for the 2014 Non Commissioned Officers Association Vanguard Award are due to the Air Force Personnel Center by Jan. 28, Air Force officials said.The award annually recognizes one enlisted member from each of the uniformed services for an act of heroism that results in saving someone's life or preventing serious injury. The act must have occurred between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2013.The act must be a voluntary action initiated by the nominee and not a result of directions or orders. Further, it must also have been a legitimate attempt to save a life or prevent serious injury to another person or people.Each major command, combatant command, field operating agency and direct reporting unit may nominate one person in each category. Organizations and base-level personnel must contact their MAJCOM, COCOM, FOA or DRU for applicable suspense dates and additional information regarding nomination procedures.For more information on Air Force recognition programs and other personnel issues, visit the myPers website at https://mypers.af.mil.NCO Corps 



awards 



NCOA
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1130 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1130

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2007

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to extend the authority 
  to withhold from public availability a financial disclosure report 
filed by an individual who is a judicial officer or judicial employee, 
 to the extent necessary to protect the safety of that individual or a 
       family member of that individual, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Judicial Disclosure Responsibility 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF FAMILY MEMBERS.

    Section 105(b)(3) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. 
App.) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``or a family member 
        of that individual'' after ``that individual''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B)(i), by inserting ``or a family 
        member of that individual'' after ``the report''.

SEC. 3. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE REPORTS.

    (a) Extension of Authority.--Section 105(b)(3) of the Ethics in 
Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by striking ``2005'' 
each place that term appears and inserting ``2009''.
    (b) Report Contents.--Section 105(b)(3)(C) of the Ethics in 
Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended--
            (1) in clause (ii), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in clause (iii), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(iv) the nature or type of information redacted;
            ``(v) what steps or procedures are in place to ensure that 
        sufficient information is available to litigants to determine 
        if there is a conflict of interest;
            ``(vi) principles used to guide implementation of redaction 
        authority; and
            ``(vii) any public complaints received relating to 
        redaction.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 21, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 182 (Tuesday, September 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57457-57458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, October 29, 2010.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

[[Page 57458]]


CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-23650 Filed 9-17-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
583 A.2d 343

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DARRYL PROCTOR.

March 20, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 AF announces SAIGE award winnersPublished June 10, 2014
                        
                        By Sammie King
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas --**
                Staff Sgt. Aaron R. Chartier, Air Force District of Washington, and Timothy K. Pyeatt, Air Force Special Operations Command, are the 2014 Society of American Indian Government Employees Meritorious Service Award winners, Air Force officials announced recently.
Chartier led a 16-member team and orchestrated 856 protective service details with the United States Secret Service, safeguarding the passage of the president and vice president of the United States, secretary of state, secretary of defense and multiple foreign dignitaries and heads of state. Additionally, Chartier successfully orchestrated a congressional delegation detail for 230 United States congressmen and senators, ensuring their safe, unimpeded attendance at the funeral of a fallen colleague, Chartier's commander said. Chartier also coordinated security escorts for President Barrack Obama, former President George W. Bush, first lady Michelle Obama, and former first ladies Laura Bush and Hillary Clinton.
Pyeatt's superior leadership and logistical expertise were crucial in the development, acquisition and fielding of a $537 million non-standard aviation program. He directly contributed to the stand-up of operational, worldwide sites which enabled more agile combat support to special operations forces in four geographic combatant command theaters. According to his commander, Pyeatt enhanced awareness and appreciation of Native American heritage and traditions within the local community through his involvement in the Citizen Potawatomi Nation, the Thunderbird Native American Honor Guard and the Inter-Tribal Council. His charitable contributions also helped raise more than $13,000 for Muscular Dystrophy research.
The awards will be presented during a June ceremony at the Isleta Pueblo Hotel in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
For more information about the SAIGE award, and other personnel recognition programs, visit the myPers website at https://mypers.af.mil.awards 



Society of American Indian Government Employees
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# DAF expands civilian employee assistance program

              - Published  Oct. 12, 2021
              -                             By Debbie Aragon                                                    
              - Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center Public Affairs

**JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, Texas (AFNS) --  **
The Department of the Air Force expanded its Employee Assistance Program Oct. 1, following a recent contract award by the **Air Force Installation Contracting Center**.The program, required by the **Air Force Chief of Staff**, provides a variety of services and support to DAF civilian employees and their families including:• Educational and motivational activities• Referral, monitoring and follow-up services• Behavioral health consultation and coaching• Short-term, solution-focused counseling• Critical incident management support“This is a critical resource for supporting our civilian workforce that is easily accessible and provided at no cost to the employee or family member,” said Danna Plewe, Air Force EAP program manager. “Anywhere, any time, AF EAP is there to help.”The $30 million contract, awarded to incumbent contractor Magellan Federal, runs for five years and enhances EAP support overseas at **Ramstein Air Base**, Germany, and **Royal Air Force Lakenheath**, United Kingdom, said JoAnn Parks, 771st Enterprise Sourcing Squadron contracting officer for the award.“EAP helps address problems in the quickest, least restrictive and most convenient manner while minimizing costs and maintaining confidentiality,” said Lt. Col. Daniel Stephens, 771st ESS commander.Under the contract, services and support are accessible year-round via telephone, web and in person.The new Air Force contract transitions the DAF program from a task order under the Department of the Navy’s EAP contract to an Air Force-only contract, giving the Air Force total autonomy over its program, Parks said.Initial plans were for a Department of Defense-wide acquisition, Stephens said, but the planned solution didn’t meet the DAF requirement and led to the 771st tasking.“We received the requirement in early May, which really was the last possible moment for us to get a contract of this magnitude completed in time to avoid a gap in service,” Stephens said. “JoAnn, the contracting officer who ran the source selection, and her team did a great job in ensuring everything got done on time, making sure this valuable service to DAF civilian employees and their families continued uninterrupted.”For more information on the Air Force’s EAP program, visit the Air Force’s Personnel Center **website**.

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceEmployee Assistance ProgramEAPAir Force Installation and Contracting Centercivilian employee assistance program771st Enterprise Sourcing SquadronAir Force Installation and Mission Support CenterAFIMSC
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FRANCISCO MARTINEZ-LOPEZ.

March 27, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
582 A.2d 1265

#### IN THE MATTER OF MORRIS J. STERN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

December 26, 1990.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that the petition for reinstatement is granted; subject, however to the condition that respondent shall submit an annual certified audit of his trust account records for the calendar years 1990, 1991 and 1992, said audits to be filed with the Office of Attorney Ethics within 30 days of the conclusion of each year.
| Signature:      /s/ Avinoam Cohen                                                                               |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Name:             Avinoam Cohen                                              |   |
| Title:               President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer |   |
| and Director                                                                                                                                  |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                                                                  |   |
|                                                                                                                                          |   |
|                                                                                                                                          |   |
| Signature:      /s/ Anna Irena De Vincenz                                                                       |   |   |
| Name:             Anna Irena De Vincenz                                           |   |
| Title:               Secretary and Director                             |   |
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________
No. 02

- 24

- 00185

- CR No. 02

- 24

- 00186

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 396th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No s

. 1798140, 1799933

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. M emorandum Opinion by Justice Birdwell 

### J ESUS 

### R AMIREZROSALES 

### , Appellant

V



### .

T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Jes us Ramirezrosales attempts to appeal his two convictions , b ut he
waived his right to appeal in each case as part of his plea bargain s with the State.

“ In a plea bargain case

. . . a defendant may appeal only [] (A) those matters that
were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, (B) after getting the trial

court’s permission to appeal, or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized
by statute.” Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02. The
trial court must file a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal, clarifying whether
the case involved a plea bargain and the defendant waived his right to appeal. See Tex.
R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).
Appellant’s judgments of conviction reflect that , in both of his cases, he
pleaded guilty and the trial court sentenced him in accordance with the “Terms of

[ his ] Plea Bargain .” T he plea

- bargain paperwork accompanying these judgments

— paperwork that was signed by both Appellant and his trial counsel —further confirms
that Appellant “waive[d] all rights of appeal.” And the trial court ’s certifications show

this as well, stating that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal” and that the

cases are “ plea

- bargain case[s], and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See id.

Because a criminal appeal “ must be dismissed if a certification that shows the
defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record,” Tex. R. App.
P. 25.2(d), we warned Appellant via letter that we would dismiss his appeal s unless,3 within ten days, he showed grounds for continuing them

. 1 See Tex. R. App. P.
25.2(d), 44.3. W e received no response.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal s based on the trial court’s certifications

. See
Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

/s/ Wade Birdwell

Wade Birdwell Justice

Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered : August 1, 2024

1 O ur initial letter to Appellant was returned to us, so we obtained updated

contact information for him and re- sent the letter to his new address. More than a month has passed since we s ent the second letter, and it has not been returned.
583 A.2d 306

#### CARLSTADT-EAST RUTHERFORD REGIONAL BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BECTON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.

January 23, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### P. J. Willis & Bro. v. Turnley & Bro.

(No. 1054. Op. Book No. 2, p. 379.)

Appeal from Galveston County.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 789. *Contract; definition and requisites of.*A contract, in legal contemplation, has been defined to be an agreement between two or more parties for the doing or *434not doing of some particular thing. [1 Pars, on Con. 6.] Or, as defined by Blackstone: “A contract is an agreement upon sufficient consideration to do, or not to do, a particular thing.” [2 Black. Com. 446.] The essentials of a legal contract are: first, the parties; secondly, the consideration; thirdly, the assent of .the parties, without which there is in law no contract; and fourthly, the subject matter of the contract, i. e., what the parties propose as its effect. [1 Pars. Con. 8.] It has been well and forcibly said, that it is a principle of the law of contracts that there must be an agreement of the minds of the parties, or the concert and harmony of their intentions, and this is said to be essential. The parties to the contract must propose and mean the same thing, and in the same sense. [1 Pars. Con. 6.] It is not only necessary that the minds of the contracting parties should meet on the subject matter of the contract, but they must communicate that fact to each other, so that both may know that their minds do meet, and it is then only that the mutual assent necessary to a valid contract exists, and not until then that the contract is concluded. [Patton v. Rucker, 29 Tex. 408; Fort v. Barnett, 23 Tex. 463.]

February 19, 1881.

Reversed and remanded.