alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 PACAF commander to senators: Homeland defense ‘sacred responsibility’Published April 22, 2016
                        
                        By Cheryl Pellerin
                        
                        
                        DOD News, Defense Media Activity
                
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS)** -- “Defense of the homeland is a sacred responsibility and the No. 1 mission of the Department of Defense,” Gen. Lori J. Robinson told a Senate panel April 21 during her nomination hearing to become commander of U.S. Northern Command and North American Aerospace Defense Command.
Robinson, who now commands Pacific Air Forces and is air component commander for U.S. Pacific Command, testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee, noting that the U.S. faces a rapidly evolving and growing threat environment in terms of the number of those who wish to harm the nation and the complexity of tools at their disposal.
“Our country faces many challenging threats from within and abroad, ranging from threats such as home-grown violent extremist, cyberattacks (and) trafficking of drugs and other illicit products by transnational criminal organizations -- two threats posed by nation states such as Russia, North Korea and Iran,” Robinson said.
“In my experiences as the Pacific Air Forces commander and the air component for (U.S. Pacific Command Commander Navy Adm. Harry) Harris, I'm intimately aware of the tenuous situation on the (Korean) peninsula and throughout the region, and understand the potential threats posed to the security of our homeland,” the general said.
Robinson told the panel that if confirmed she will work to uphold the faith that the American people have placed in NORTHCOM and NORAD and to ensure that the commands remain vigilant and postured to outpace any potential threat.
If confirmed, Robinson said, she will continue to develop strong relationships with U.S. homeland partners, so the nation is prepared to provide defense support to federal, state and local authorities as requested when the American people need it.
The general added that she would further strengthen the outstanding U.S. friendship with Canada and help grow U.S. partnerships with Mexico and the Bahamas.
Last month, after President Barack Obama nominated Robinson to head NORTHCOM and NORAD, Defense Secretary Ash Carter released a statement that said Robinson has excelled in an array of leadership positions where training, force structure and readiness are paramount.
“Her deep operational experience,” the secretary added, “will enable the men and women of NORAD and NORTHCOM continue building upon the excellence they have demonstrated under Adm. William Gortney’s strong and steady leadership in this critical command.”
If confirmed, Robinson will be the first woman to head one of the nine unified combatant commands.Congress 



NORAD 



Northcom 



nomination 



senate 



hearing 



DOD
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James S.J. Manuso, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SuperGen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of SuperGen, Inc.

By:

/s/ JAMES S.J. MANUSOName:

James S.J. ManusoTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


I,
Michael Molkentin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
SuperGen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
SuperGen, Inc.

By:

/s/ MICHAEL MOLKENTINName:

Michael MolkentinTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 93 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5695]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

CONCERN FOR THE REPUTATION OF THE HOUSE RAISED BY UNRESOLVED QUESTIONS 
                         ON SPEAKER'S BOOK DEAL

  (Mr. THOMPSON asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. THOMPSON. Mr. Speaker, I rise today out of concern for the 
reputation of this institution. It is devastating when the Speaker of 
the House of Representatives does not stand by his words. Newt Gingrich 
announced earlier this year that he would not sign his book deal with 
Rupert Murdoch until the Ethics Committee had approved the contract. 
The jury is still out. And what has the Speaker done? He has ignored 
the Ethics Committee and signed the contract anyway. Maybe the Speaker 
knows something that we do not know. Is it because every single 
Republican on the Ethics Committee has a conflict of interest in the 
Speaker's case? Is it likely that they cannot be credible as judge and 
jury?
  Mr. Speaker, how can Newt Gingrich make such an outrageous claim, 
that if the Ethics Committee has not finished its deliberations, then 
he will assume that no rules have been broken. The Ethics Committee 
clearly said to the Speaker not to make such an absurd assumption. Once 
again, the Speaker has demonstrated that he will not allow the Rules or 
the Ethics Committee to stand in the way of his multi-million-dollar 
book deal. Is this the same person who led the call for an 
investigation of the former Speaker of the House, Jim Wright? I ask 
today, out of fairness to the American people, appoint an outside 
counsel. What's good for the goose is also good for the gander.

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Paul E. Ross,certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Meade Instruments Corp.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)     disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting

Date: June1, 2007
| By:                                           | /s/ PAUL E. ROSS |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|------------------|--------|
| *Senior  Vice President—Finance and CFO* |

 

----
#### T. D. Vaughn v. G., C. & S. F. R'y Co.

(No. 2216.)

Appeal from Brazos County.

Ford & Boremus and Henderson & Butler, for appellant.

A. C. Brietz, for appellee.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 230. *Brief; rules respecting.*Appellee moves to strike out appellant’s briefs herein filed, because the same do not set out each assignment of error relied upon for a reversal of the judgment. Upon inspection of said briefs *279we find that while the assignments of error are not set forth therein, they contain propositions made under each assignment of error relied upon, and those propositions refer by number to the particular assignment under which they are made. In our opinion, there is no rule governing briefs which requires the assignments of error to be set forth in the briefs. It is required that *propositions*relating to assignments shall be made, unless the assignments themselves are propositions. [Rules for Sup. Ct. 29 to 86 inclusive, 47 Tex. 603.] In the case of The Texas Land Company v. Williams, 48 Tex. 602, Ch. J. Roberts, to illustrate the requisites of a brief under the rules, gives a form of a proper and sufficient brief, and in this form the assignments of error relied upon are set forth. But it is not said in that decision that the failure to set forth the assignments would render the brief insufficient. In Haley v. Davidson1 Moore, J., says: “By the rules as now framed, it (the brief) is a mere statement of the points or propositions relied upon to reverse or affirm the judgment, the matters in the record pertinent to sustain or rebut these points, and a reference to the authorities relied upon. . . . Each point presented must refer to and show under which assignment it is presented. The appellant, however, has the right to present all the errors in the record raised by his assignments; therefore, he may present as many points under each assignment as it warrants. But each point must present clearly and tersely a single proposition.” In Shanks v. Carroll, 50 Tex. 17, it is said: “The brief contemplated and required by the rules should, in short, embrace nothing but the propositions •— set forth clearly, distinctly and separately — relied upon for the reversal of the judgment, the matters in the record pertinent to the proper understanding of each proposition, and a citation simply of the authorities relied upon to maintain the validity or correctness of the propositions thus asserted; while all inferences and deductions, either from the authorities cited, or from mat*280ters in the record thus stated, are to be presented to the court by an oral, written or printed argument.” We have examined all other decisions of our supreme court relating to briefs, and none of them require that the assignments of error shall be set forth in the brief. [McManus v. Wallis, 52 Tex. 534; Texas Banking Co. v. Hutchins, 53 Tex. 61; McCauley v. Long & Co. 61 Tex. 74; National Bank v. Lovenberg, 63 Tex. 506.] We conclude that appellant’s briefs are in substantial compliance with the rules and decisions of our supreme court, and the motion of appellee is overruled.

January 22, 1887.

Motion overruled.

1

48 Tex. 615.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1013 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1013

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to prohibit the approval 
    or continuation of section 1115 waivers insofar as they provide 
   coverage of nonpregnant adults under the State Children's Health 
                       Insurance Program (SCHIP).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2007

 Mr. Burgess introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to prohibit the approval 
    or continuation of section 1115 waivers insofar as they provide 
   coverage of nonpregnant adults under the State Children's Health 
                       Insurance Program (SCHIP).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF SECTION 1115 WAIVERS FOR COVERAGE OF 
              NONPREGNANT ADULTS UNDER SCHIP.

    (a) In General.--Section 2107(f) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1397gg) is amended, as added by section 6102(a) of the Deficit 
Reduction Act of 2005 (Public law 109-171) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``childless''; and
            (2) by striking the second sentence.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 2105(c)(1) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397ee(c)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``childless''; and
            (2) by striking the second sentence.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Termination of Funding of Coverage Under Current Waivers.--In 
the case of any waiver, experimental, pilot, or demonstration project 
that would allow funds made available under title XXI of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397aa et seq.) to be used to provide child 
health assistance or other health benefits coverage to an adult (other 
than pregnant adult) that is approved as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act, on and after such date the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services shall not extend or renew such a waiver or project in a manner 
that permits funds under the waiver or project to be used for such 
purpose and shall otherwise take such action as is necessary to prevent 
the use of funds under the waiver or project to be used for such 
purpose on and after January 1, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5388]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              AMERICAN OVERSEAS INTERESTS ACT IS MIXED BAG

  (Mr. PALLONE asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, the American Overseas Interests Act 
legislation that we will be debating today is a mixed bag at best. In 
some respects the bill represents a retreat from America's role of 
promoting democracy in those lands that were formerly part of the 
Soviet Union.
  The bill authorizes $145 million less than the administration's 
fiscal year 1996 request and $76 million less than the 1995 level. We 
need to draw a distinction between Russia and the other Soviet 
Republics. After spending billions guarding against Moscow's aggressive 
expansionism during the cold war, I believe it is still an important 
American interest to continue promoting the transition to democracy in 
the former captive nations of the Soviet Union.
  Also I do want to express praise for one provision of the bill 
included by the gentleman from New Jersey [Mr. Smith], known as the 
Humanitarian Aid Corridor Act. That act would withhold U.S. aid to 
nations which are blocking congressionally approved humanitarian 
assistance to other countries. It requires all of U.S. aid recipients 
to allow unencumbered delivery of humanitarian assistance.
  The Republic of Turkey has imposed a blockade on the neighboring 
Republic of Armenia, preventing delivery of food, medicine and other 
humanitarian relief supplies from reaching Armenia. Much of this aid 
originates in the United States.
  This Humanitarian Aid Corridor Act would prevent countries like 
Turkey from receiving aid if they prevent this aid from getting 
through.

                          ____________________
```
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1024 

To provide for the issuance of a postage stamp commemorating the 450th 

anniversary of the founding of the first European settlement in the 

continental United States, at Pensacola, Florida, by Trista ́n de Luna 

in 1559. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2007 

Mr. MILLER of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for the issuance of a postage stamp commemorating the 450th anniversary of the founding of the 

first European settlement in the continental United 

States, at Pensacola, Florida, by Trista ́n de Luna in 

1559. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMMEMORATIVE POSTAGE STAMP. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Postmaster General shall 

5 provide for the issuance of a postage stamp to commemo6 rate the 450th anniversary of the founding of the first EuVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:31 Feb 17, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1024.IH H1024

hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 1024 IH

1 ropean settlement in the continental United States, at 

2 Pensacola, Florida, by Trista ́n de Luna in 1559. 

3 (b) DURATION.—Such stamp shall be issued for such 

4 period of time as the Postmaster General may determine, 

5 but at least throughout calendar year 2009. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
News United States Air Force
 April issue of Airman magazine now availablePublished April 4, 2016
                        
                        By Airman Magazine Staff
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)  --**
                The April issue of Airman magazine is now available to download and is viewable through a Web browser. 
Featured on our cover, “The perfect storm” gives a birds-eye view of the F-35 Lightning II as it goes through rigorous testing and evaluation in order to be declared initial operational capability within the projected deadline later this year.
Next, we follow a maintainer and his jet from the battlefield to the boneyard in “Struck by the Thunderbolt.” 
In our final feature, the past mingles with the present during a heritage flight experience at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona. 
Airman magazine provides an interactive experience for tablet readers and a limited interactive version is viewable in Web browser format.
You can download Airman magazine’s April issue for your tablet here:
• Apple version 
• Android version 
To read this issue on a PC/Mac, click here.
For more stories, visit Airman Online, the website for the official magazine of the U.S. Air Force.Airman 



magazine 



April 



F-35
News United States Air Force
 EOD techs conduct post-blast analysis trainingPublished Nov. 28, 2015
                        
                        By Senior Airman Meagan Schutter
                        
                        
                        1st Special Operations Wing Public Affairs
                **HURLBURT FIELD, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                After an explosion, when the smoke settles and the blaze has been contained, a new mission begins. Like a puzzle, shrapnel blasted in every direction can be pieced together to uncover the mode of detonation. Explosive ordnance disposal Airmen assigned to the 1st Special Operations Civil Engineer Squadron are trained to do just that.The EOD team at Hurlburt Field recently conducted post-blast analysis training, a form of analysis that takes place after an improvised explosive device has detonated.“Most people just see an explosion and think that’s it, but it doesn’t end there,” said Staff Sgt. Thomas Johnson, an EOD journeyman with the squadron. “It really starts there, and it’s the work that begins after the explosion that reveals everything about the scenario.“The goal is to reconstruct what happened, not only to find out what the device was, but how it was planted, why, who and under what circumstances,” Johnson continued. “What was their target?”The desired result when looking at the IED and the site surrounding it is to recreate the scenario, as a whole. The entire scene is then explained through summary, narratives and diagrams.Improvised explosive devices have become prominent in modern warfare. In a deployed environment, IEDs can bring certain challenges.“The hard part can be if the explosion consumes everything, all you are left with is a blast hole and you are trying to recreate the whole event from nothing,” Johnson said.In hostile environments, EOD Airmen may not be able to conduct in-depth blast analysis, but if the scene allows, they can spend up to a week investigating the area.“What you’re trying to do is find every piece of the IED that detonated.” said Staff Sgt. Teddy Compston, an EOD journeyman at the squadron. “That is really difficult because there are so many things you can use to make an IED, so you never really know what you are looking for.”Wood boxes, plastic containers and backpacks are just some items that can be used, as well as multiple types of batteries, from double A to car batteries.Training EOD Airmen to collect evidence during a post-blast analysis will ensure they can accomplish their mission down range.“If they have never seen a post-blast or trained on evidence preservation, this is something they won’t get out of a PowerPoint or a simple lecture,” Johnson said. “It’s hands-on.”The ability to get out of the classroom and onto the range allows an EOD technician to train effectively and optimize their performance in a deployed location.“What I want to get out of this range day is to give them experience for the future in case they have to do it in the real world,” Compston said. “I don’t want their first post-blast to be a real-life situation.”explosives 



Hurlburt Field 



special operations 



EOD