alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew F. Puzder, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
November 3, 2003, of CKE Restaurants, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-82538 and 34-47986];

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financing reporting.

Date: December 10, 2003

/s/ Andrew F. PuzderAndrew F. Puzder
Chief Executive Officer
#### IN RE PAROLE APPLICATION OF WILLIAM HAWLEY.

February 16, 1984.

Petitions for certification granted. (See 192 *N.J.Super.*85)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5085]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair would announce that he will 
entertain 15 1-minutes on each side.

                          ____________________
```
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 66 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to establish 

and protect the rights of victims of violent crimes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2007 

Mr. CHABOT introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to establish and protect the rights of victims 

of violent crimes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification, and which shall take effect 180 days after 

10 ratification by the required number of States: 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
2 

•HJ 66 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Without denying or abridging the con3 stitutional rights of those accused of committing a violent 

4 crime, the rights of victims of violent crime are hereby 

5 established and shall not be denied by any State or the 

6 United States and may be restricted only as provided in 

7 this article. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. A victim of violent crime shall have the 

9 right to reasonable and timely notice of any public pro10 ceeding involving the crime and of any release or escape 

11 of the accused; the right not to be excluded from such 

12 public proceeding; the right reasonably to be heard at pub13 lic release, plea, sentencing, reprieve, and pardon pro14 ceedings; and the right to adjudicative decisions that duly 

15 consider the victim’s safety, interest in avoiding unreason16 able delay, and just and timely claims to restitution from 

17 the offender. These rights shall not be restricted except 

18 when, and to the degree dictated by, a substantial interest 

19 in public safety or the administration of criminal justice 

20 requires such restrictions, or by other compelling neces21 sity. 

22 ‘‘SECTION 3. Nothing in this article shall be con23 strued to provide grounds for a new trial or to authorize 

24 any claim for damages. Only the victim or the victim’s 

25 lawful representative may assert the rights established by 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
3 

•HJ 66 IH 

1 this article, and no person accused of the crime may obtain 

2 any form of relief hereunder. 

3 ‘‘SECTION 4. Congress shall have power to enforce 

4 this article by appropriate legislation. Nothing in this arti5 cle shall affect the President’s authority to grant reprieves 

6 or pardons.’’. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         168,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,586,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,088,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,814,000
<PP&E>                                      43,551,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,428,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,809,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,371,000
<BONDS>                                      8,362,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,119,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,809,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,446,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,353,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               572,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               485,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             284,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,752,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    47,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,705,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,705,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
Unassociated Document








 




EXHIBIT 10 (b) 

RULE 30a-2(b) CERTIFICATION 
















In connection with this report on Form N-CSR for the registrant as furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and 




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. 







By:             /s/ BRIAN T. ZINO 

   Brian T. Zino 

   Chief Executive Officer 




Date:       December 2, 2003 







By:          /s/ LAWRENCE P. VOGEL 

   Lawrence P. Vogel 

   Chief Financial Officer 




Date:         December 2, 2003
#### John C. Yarbrough v. D. T. Chamberlin.

(No. 1029, Op. Book No. 2, p. 386.)

Appeal from Milam County.

June 22, 1881.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1122. *Forcible entry and detainer; complaint in; requisites of.*In a case of forcible entry and detainer the complaint did not show that the premises or any part thereof were situated in the justice’s precinct where the suit was instituted, nor that the relation of landlord and tenant existed between plaintiff and defendant. *Held,*that for the want of these averments the complaint was insufficient, and that the suit was properly dismissed by the justice of the peace, and that the appellee’s *certiorari*to the county court should likewise have been dismissed. [Cooper v. Marchbanks, 22 Tex. 1; Williams v. Ball, 52 Tex. 603.] The judgment of the county court refusing to dismiss the appellee’s *certiorari*and adjudging the possession of the premises to appellee was reversed and the suit dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 7, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00747

- CV

Marcelo GALVAN Jr. and Analicia R. Galvan

,

Appellant s

v.

Cledson Macedo de CARVALHO and Kristina Carvalho,

Appellee s

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CVH001835

- D1

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The trial court clerk has filed a notification of late record, stating that the appellant s have failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record and that the appellant s are not entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

We, therefore, ORDER the appellant s to provide written proof to this court within ten days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the cl erk’s fee; or (2) appellant s are entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. If appellant s fail to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b); see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c) (allowing dismissal of appeal if appellant fails to comply with an order of this court).

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

I N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of December, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk o f Court
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 8 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal 

the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation 

on the number of terms an individual may serve as President. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, 

thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms 

an individual may serve as President. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 8 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

4 ‘‘The twenty-second article of amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States is hereby repealed.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 56 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Arthur Schomburg should be recognized for his leadership and contributions in documenting, recording, 

and researching the historical contributions to society of peoples of African descent and for his efforts to combat racial and ethnic discrimination 

in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2007 

Mr. RANGEL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Arthur Schomburg 

should be recognized for his leadership and contributions 

in documenting, recording, and researching the historical 

contributions to society of peoples of African descent 

and for his efforts to combat racial and ethnic discrimination in the United States. 

Whereas Arthur Schomburg was born in Puerto Rico on January 24, 1874, and immigrated to New York City in 

1891; 

Whereas Arthur Schomburg first developed his thirst for 

knowledge about peoples of African descent through his 

participation in a history club; 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HCON 56 IH 

Whereas during the early 20th century, Arthur Schomburg 

participated in the civil rights movements of immigrant 

Cubans and Puerto Ricans living in New York City; 

Whereas Arthur Schomburg was a mason before he began to 

write about African world history and to collect written 

works focusing on the African Diaspora; 

Whereas Arthur Schomburg was a collector of letters, manuscripts, prints, playbills, and paintings relating to African 

world history and the African Diaspora, and was particularly proud of his collection of almanacs produced by 

Benjamin Banneker; 

Whereas Arthur Schomburg was keenly interested in the history of the Caribbean Basin and Latin America and its 

peoples and heroic figures; 

Whereas Arthur Schomburg, who frequently loaned objects 

from his personal library to the 135th Street Branch of 

the New York Public Library, saw his collection become 

the cornerstone of the Division of Negro Literature, History, and Prints of the New York Public Library; 

Whereas in 1926 Arthur Schomburg sold his collection, which 

numbered 10,000 items, to the New York Public Library 

with the financial help of the Carnegie Corporation; and 

Whereas Arthur Schomburg was deeply involved in the cultural movement known as the Harlem Renaissance and 

was driven to combat racial prejudice by providing the 

proof of the extraordinary contributions of peoples of African descent: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that Arthur 

3 Schomburg should be recognized both for his leadership 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•HCON 56 IH 

1 and contributions in documenting, recording, and re2 searching the historical contributions to society of peoples 

3 of African descent and for his efforts to combat racial and 

4 ethnic discrimination in the United States. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of Jazz Pharmaceuticals Public Limited Company



|                                         |  |                                    
|---------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|Name                                     |  | State/Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                         | 
|Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.               |  | Delaware                           
|Jazz Pharmaceuticals Commercial Corp.(1) |  | New York                           
|Orphan Medical, LLC(1)                   |  | Delaware                           
|JPI Commercial, LLC(1)                   |  | Delaware                           
|Azur Pharma Research Limited             |  | Ireland                            
|Azur Pharma International Limited        |  | Bermuda                            
|Azur Pharma International II Limited     |  | Bermuda                            
|Azur Pharma International III Limited    |  | Bermuda                            



|(1) | Subsidiary of Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and indirect subsidiary of Jazz Pharmaceuticals Public Limited Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1058 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1058

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the Hope 
  Scholarship Credit to be used for elementary and secondary expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2007

Mr. Paul (for himself and Mr. McCotter) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the Hope 
  Scholarship Credit to be used for elementary and secondary expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hope Plus Scholarship Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. HOPE SCHOLARSHIP CREDIT AVAILABLE FOR ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY 
              EDUCATIONAL EXPENSES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (f) of section 25A of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(3) Special rule for hope scholarship credit.--In the 
        case of the Hope Scholarship Credit, the term `qualified 
        tuition and related expenses' shall include `qualified 
        elementary and secondary education expenses' (as defined in 
        section 530(b)(4)); except that--
                    ``(A) such term shall include a contribution or 
                gift to the school (other than the home school) at 
                which dependents of the taxpayer are attending, and
                    ``(B) the term `school' shall include a home 
                school.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006.
                                 <all>
```
Sample Employee Letter 





December 1, 2003 




«First_Name»
«Last_Name» 
«Address_1»
«Address_2»
«City»,
«State» «Zip»





Dear 
«First_Name»: 



In accordance with the terms and
conditions of the Midwest Express Holdings, Inc. 2003 All Employee Stock Option Plan (the
“Plan”), you have been granted a Non-Qualified Stock Option to purchase shares
of stock as outlined below. This stock option plan is being offered as one measure of
recognition for your contribution to our company’s restructuring. This is one of many
ways our company intends to Support Our People as we move into a new era of operations and
a more profitable future. 



	Granted to:	«First_Name» «Last_Name»
		«SSN»
	
Grant date:	November 21, 2003
	
Number of options granted:	«Rounded_Up»
	
Option price per share:	$2.89
	
Total cost to exercise these options:	«Cost_to_Exercise»
	
Expiration date:	August 21, 2013 (or earlier in the event of
		termination of employment as described in the Plan
		Summary)
	
Vesting Schedule:	33-1/3% -- upon date of grant
		33-1/3% -- August 21, 2004 (if employed)
		33-1/3% -- August 21, 2005 (if employed)





By my signature below, I hereby
acknowledge receipt of these Options granted on the date shown above, which have been
issued to me under the terms and conditions of the Plan. I further acknowledge receipt of
the copy of the Plan Summary, and I agree to comply with all of the terms and conditions
of the Plan and Plan Summary. 


		
	Employee Signature:____________________________________________________________	Date:____________________
	                                     «First_Name» «Last_Name»







Please return one signed
copy before January 30, 2004 to Stock Options in Human Resources-HQ22. Please retain the
other copy for your personal records.  



Note: If there are any
discrepancies in the name or address shown above, please make the appropriate corrections
on this form.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 73 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 73

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 relating to the process by which the House of Representatives chooses 
the President of the United States in the event no candidate receives a 
                    majority of the electoral votes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 2007

   Mr. Sherman introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 relating to the process by which the House of Representatives chooses 
the President of the United States in the event no candidate receives a 
                    majority of the electoral votes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Whenever the right to choose the President devolves 
upon the House of Representatives, the Members of the House shall cast 
votes on an individual basis, and the candidate receiving the greatest 
number of votes cast by the Members shall be the President so long as 
such number is a majority of the votes cast.
    ``Section 2. For purposes of a meeting of the House to cast votes 
under section 1, a majority of the House shall constitute a quorum.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5053]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Michigan [Mr. Smith] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. SMITH of Michigan addressed the House. His remarks will appear 
hereafter in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```