alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 4 

Urging increased Federal funding for juvenile (Type 1) diabetes research. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas submitted the following concurrent resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Urging increased Federal funding for juvenile (Type 1) 

diabetes research. 

Whereas over 1.3 million Americans suffer from juvenile 

(Type 1) diabetes, a chronic, genetically determined, debilitating disease affecting every organ system; 

Whereas 13,000 children a year—35 each day—are diagnosed with juvenile diabetes; 

Whereas 17,000 adults a year—46 each day—are diagnosed 

with juvenile diabetes; 

Whereas juvenile diabetes is one of the most costly chronic 

diseases of childhood; 

Whereas insulin treats but does not cure this potentially 

deadly disease and does not prevent the complications of 

diabetes, which include blindness, heart attack, kidney 

failure, stroke, nerve damage, and amputations; 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 4 IH 

Whereas the Diabetes Research Working Group, a nonpartisan advisory board established to advise Congress, 

has called for an accelerated and expanded diabetes research program at the National Institutes of Health and 

has recommended a funding level of $1.6 billion at the 

NIH for diabetes research in 2004 and actual funding is 

only $946 million; and 

Whereas a strong public-private partnership to fund juvenile 

diabetes exists between the Federal Government and the 

Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International, a 

foundation which has awarded more than $800 million 

for diabetes research since 1970 and gave more than $85 

million in fiscal year 2004: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Federal funding for diabetes research 

3 should be increased in accordance with the recommenda4 tions of the Diabetes Research Working Group so that a 

5 cure for juvenile diabetes can be found. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-1870V

UNPUBLISHED

SHERRI MCCOYLE,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: May 19, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Terrence Kevin Mangan, Jr., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for 

respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On December 11, 2019, Sherri McCoyle filed a petition for compensation under 

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”), which meets the Table definition for SIRVA, after receiving the 

influenza vaccine on October 1, 2018. Petition at 1, ¶ 2. Petitioner further alleges that she 

received the vaccine in the United States, that she suffered the residual effects of her

SIRVA for more than six months, and that neither she nor any other party has filed a civil 

action or received compensation for his injury. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 2, 11-12. The case was 

assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).

CORRECTED
2

On May 19, 2021, Respondent filed a combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer in 

which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s 

Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer at 1. Specifically, Respondent has “concluded that 

[P]etitioner’s claim meets the Table criteria for SIRVA.” Id. at 3-4. 

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# President announces intent to nominate key AF position 

              - Published  Oct. 30, 2013

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  **
President Barack Obama announced his intent to nominate several key administration posts Oct. 30, to include a pivotal Air Force position.

According to the announcement, Dr. William LaPlante Jr. was named to be nominated by the president as assistant secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition.

LaPlante is currently the principal deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, a position he has held since May.  

Prior to this job, LaPlante held positions at MITRE Corporation and the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory and has more than 28 years of experience in defense technology.

He began his career at Johns Hopkins University in 1985 and served in various capacities until 2011, including Global Engagement department head, Business Area Executive for Undersea Warfare and National Security Technology Associate department head, and the Strategic Submarine Security Program area manager.  

LaPlante was appointed to the Defense Science Board in 2010.  He has also been a member of the U.S. Strategic Command Strategic Advisory Group and an adjunct lecturer in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the Catholic University of America. 

He received a B.S. from the University of Illinois, an M.S. from Johns Hopkins University, and a Ph.D. from Catholic University of America.

 

 

Dr. William LaPlante Jr.assistant secretary of the Air Forceacquisition
Exhibit 31.01

                            CERTIFICATION

I, Tom Hofer, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Vendalux
Corporation

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report(the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors ( or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls'
and

Date: November 23, 2004

By: /s/
   ---------------------------------
   Tom Hofer
   (Chief Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Promissory Note dated December 6, 2000-Murphy



 Exhibit 10.46 
  
 GROCERS CAPITAL COMPANY PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

	$80,000.00	 	Commerce, California	 	December 06, 2000

  
 Daniel J. Murphy and Debra A. Murphy,
as Co-borrowers, promise to pay in lawful money of the United States of America, to the order of the GROCERS CAPITAL COMPANY (“GCC”) at its office located at 5200 Sheila Street, Commerce, California 90040, the principal sum of eighty
thousand and 00/100 ($80,000.00) with interest thereon from December 06, 2000 at the rate of seven percent (7.00%) per annum. Co-borrowers shall pay quarterly interest payments due the 25th of the last month of each calendar quarter. The whole sum of principal then unpaid, together with accrued interest thereon, is due and payable at the option
of the holder of this note. 
  
 The advance represented by this
Note has been made to facilitate the Co-borrowers’ relocation. This Note is not, however, and should not be construed as an employment contract between the Borrower and Unified Western Grocers, Inc. If the Borrower shall resign or be terminated
for cause from employment at Unified Western Grocers, this Note shall be due and payable sixty (60) days after such resignation or termination. 
  
 Should default be made in payment of interest, and the undersigned fail to cure such default within twenty (20) days after written notice of such default,
then the whole sum of principal and interest shall, at the option of the holder of this note, become immediately due and payable in lawful money of the United States. 
  
 Each maker will be jointly and severally liable and consents to renewals, replacements, and extensions of time for payment
hereof before, at or after maturity, and waives presentment, demand and protest and the right to assert any statute of limitations. A married person who signs this note agrees that recourse may be had against his/her separate property for any
obligation contained herein. If any action be instituted on this note, the undersigned promise(s) to pay such sum as the Court may fix as attorney’s fees. 
  

			
	 /s/    DANIEL J. MURPHY
	 	 	 	 /s/    DEBRA A. MURPHY

	
	 	 	

	 Daniel J. Murphy
	 	 	 	 Debra A. Murphy
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 7, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-1245

Lower Tribunal No. 10-27774

________________



### Jesse Loor

, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton Hirsch

, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Paul DeSousa

, Assistant

Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jill D. Kramer

, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION TO VACATE OPINION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

We grant the appellant’s motion to vacate opinion for lack of jurisdiction,

vacate the prior per curiam affirmance issued on April 15, 2015, and issue thefollowing opinion in its stead. See Del Risco v. State

, 203 So. 3d 909 (Fla. 3d

DCA 2016), vacating for lack of jurisdiction

, 207 So. 3d 886 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)

(unpublished table decision).

Before trial, the defendant filed a pro se Notice of Waiver of Counsel that

the trial court subsequently denied after a Faretta hearing. See Faretta v.

California

, 422 U.S. 806 (1975). Specifically, the trial court found that the

defendant was not competent to conduct his own defense at trial, and the defendant

filed a pro se notice of appeal of that order. Counsel for the defendant was

unaware of the appeal.

A criminal defendant generally does not have the right to an interlocutory

appeal. Lopez v. State

, 638 So. 2d 931, 932 (Fla. 1994). The trial court’s order at

issue here “does not fall within any of the enumerated categories of appealable

non-final orders found in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130 or 9.140(b).”

Accordingly, this Court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the defendant’s interlocutory

appeal. See Baez v. State

, 985 So. 2d 1223, 1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); see also

Rentas v. State

, 133 So. 3d 1117, 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (“[The defendant] is

not entitled to nonfinal review of the trial court’s ruling on the self-representation

issue.”). We therefore vacate our decision of April 15, 2015.

2
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5626]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair will advise that Members should 
address their remarks to the Chair and not to the President.

                          ____________________
```
NO. 07-01-0492-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

FEBRUARY 14, 2002

______________________________

TROY LEE HARMS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 34,541-E; HON. ABE LOPEZ, PRESIDING

_______________________________

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

Appellant, Troy Lee Harms, appeals from a judgment revoking his community

supervision, adjudicating his guilt, and sentencing him to prison for fifteen years.

Sentence was pronounced in open court on November 15, 2001. Thus, the appellate

record was due by January 14, 2002. TEX. R. APP. P. 35.2(a). Though the reporter’s

record has been received, the clerk’s record has not. Furthermore, according to the court

clerk, the record has not been developed because: 1) she has not received an order from
2

the trial court to develop same; 2) she has not received payment nor an affidavit of inability

to pay from appellant; and 3) appellant has not made arrangements to pay for same. 

Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 108th District

Court of Potter County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court

shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing

to determine the following: 

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 

2. whether appellant is indigent; 

3. whether counsel has been appointed to prosecute this appeal;

4. if counsel has not been appointed, whether appellant is entitled to appointed 

 counsel; and

5. whether the appellant is entitled to the preparation of a free clerk’s record. 

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. Furthermore, the trial court shall

execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the aforementioned issues and

disclosing the name, address, state bar number, and telephone and fax numbers of

counsel appointed, if any. The district court shall also cause to be developed 1) a

supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and all

orders of the district court issued as a result of its hearing on this matter, and 2) a

reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the

aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the district court shall cause the supplemental

clerk’s record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before March 18, 2002. Should
3

further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be

requested before March 14, 2002. 

 It is so ordered. 

 Per Curiam 

 Do not publish.
**EXHIBIT
        32**
 **Certification
        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 **(Subsections
        (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
        Code)**
 
 Pursuant
        to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
        of
        section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
        undersigned officers of Kings Road Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation
        (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
        that:
 
 The
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended January 31,
        2007
        (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
        section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
        contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
        financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Kings Road Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by Kings Road Entertainment,
        Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon
        request.
  Dated:
        July 23, 2008
 
 /s/
        Philip Holmes
 Philip
        Holmes
 President
 
 
 /s/
        Robert Kainz
 Robert
        Kainz
 Chief
        Financial Officer
News United States Air Force
 'Eddie the Eagle' star soarsPublished Feb. 23, 2016
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Samantha Mathison
                        
                        
                        301st Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **NAVAL AIR STATION JOINT RESERVE BASE FORT WORTH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Hugh Jackman, star of the upcoming movie "Eddie the Eagle," received a civic leader flight in an F-16 Fighting Falcon at Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth from the 301st Fighter Wing Feb. 19 in a display of Air Force Reserve combat capability and air superiority."This is kind of a dream come true," Jackman said before the flight. "I'm very, very excited, a little nervous, and I'm fully aware how lucky I am to have this opportunity."The wing flew Jackman prior to a sneak preview movie offered to base military members, employees, retirees and their families."There's an incredible amount of gratitude," he said. "When you're actually here on the base and you realize the dedication to this area of service, it's humbling and it's something all of us are very grateful for."Jackman's co-star, Taron Egerton, and director of Eddie the Eagle, Dexter Fletcher, also visited and watched Jackman's flight from the air traffic control tower.Egerton, in a special twist, coached Jackman through the jet's takeoff in a role reversal of the movie. In the film, Jackman acted as Michael 'Eddie' Edwards coach and Egerton performed as Eddie, the first ski jumper to represent Great Britain in the 1988 Calgary Winter Olympics.Jackman experienced a few aerial maneuvers in the F-16, which involved a spiral dive from 8,000 feet and a low pass over the runway. He handled the flight well and, upon landing, had only a few words to say about his experience, "It was awesome."The pilot, Lt. Col. David Efferson, the 457th Fighter Squadron commander, said he had never flown a celebrity this famous before but that the excitement is a good thing for the Air Force."Anything that we can get out, as far as our name and what we do, is good because our Airmen work so hard and do amazing things for our country," Efferson said. "Flying Hugh Jackman showcased us in a way that we normally don't have the chance to do. It was an honor to meet him, but for me, I'm more happy over the spotlight he's brought to our Airmen, the base, and the U.S. Air Force."After the flight, the Eddie the Eagle stars then headed to the Movie Reel Theater for a meet and greet with service members before the movie presentation.Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth 



Air Force Reserve Command 



reserves 



F-16 Fighting Falcon 



f-16
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5174]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Norwood] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. NORWOOD addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```