alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 00-4109

WILLIE E. GAYLES,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.

Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge.

(CR-99-49)

Submitted: July 20, 2000

Decided: August 8, 2000

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Amy M. Curtis, BOWEN, BRYANT, CHAMPLIN & CARR, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Stephen W. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Willie E. Gayles appeals from a ninety-two month sentence

imposed following his conditional guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(1) (West Supp. 2000). For

the reasons set forth below, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Although the Government does not challenge our jurisdiction to

consider this appeal, we are obligated to review our jurisdiction sua

sponte in all cases. See United States v. Blackwell, 900 F.2d 742, 746

(4th Cir. 1990). The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257,

264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229

(1960)). Appeals in criminal cases must be brought within ten days

after entry of the judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1). This appeal

period may be extended for a period of time not to exceed thirty days

from the expiration of the ten-day appeal period. See Fed. R. App. P.

4(b)(4); see also United States v. Tarrant, 158 F.3d 946, 947 (6th Cir.

1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1168 (1999); United States v. Schuchardt, 685 F.2d 901, 902 (4th Cir. 1982).

Gayles' failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the

appeal period within the applicable extension period leaves this court

without jurisdiction to consider the merits of his appeal. Moreover,

the record does not conclusively demonstrate that his failure to note

a timely appeal was due to counsel's deficient representation. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice to Gayles' right to seek

relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 2
News United States Air Force
 CMSAF visits Edwards AFBPublished July 5, 2021
                        
                        By Giancarlo Casem
                        
                        
                        412th Test Wing Public Affairs
                **EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFNS) --**
                **Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force** **JoAnne S. Bass** arrived at **Edwards Air Force Base**, June 28, for a two-day base tour to meet with the installation’s Airmen, families and civilians and see the mission of the 412th Test Wing.
“I came here to understand this mission set that you guys are doing here in Test, but I also came here because I want to hear what’s on your mind. That’s what’s most important to me,” Bass said.
Her first stop during her visit was to the base theater, where she addressed base leadership, squadron commanders and their superintendents, first sergeants and key spouses. There, she fielded questions about quality of life issues unique to the base.
Following the theater, she received a brief on the Enlisted Test Fundamentals Course at the **U.S. Air Force Test Pilot School**. The new course will allow enlisted Airmen to attend the school and focus on coursework that will provide them with specific test skill sets.
Bass utilized many forums to engage with Edwards AFB members. The largest forum took place at Hangar 1600, where she began by thanking the Airmen for their hard work and sacrifice for the past year.
“Our Airmen and our service members will do everything they can to make the mission happen ... It's not lost on us who is getting after that mission, and that's each and every one of you guys. So to that, I want to just say, ‘thank you’,” Bass said to the almost 300 Airmen in attendance.
During her tour of the base, Bass highlighted the **Air Force Chief of Staff** **Gen. CQ Brown, Jr.**’s vision for the future of the Air Force and CSAF’s **Action Orders**. Bass was also briefed on the 412th Test Wing’s mission and learned about the various challenges and conditions that make Edwards AFB unique, such as long commutes and child care issues.
She explained that recent changes to women’s hair policies and upcoming physical training test improvements were a sign that the CSAF and she are committed to accelerating the change the Air Force needs to be better suited for the future.
She informed Edwards AFB members that some quality of life changes, big and small, will be headed their way soon. For other issues that may require a bit more time, she urged Airmen and their families to stay persistent and keep pushing for change. Bass reassured them by saying, “we hear you.”AFWN 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



CMSAF 



Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force JoAnne S. Bass 



CMSAF 19 



visit 



One Air Force 



readiness 



culture 



Edwards Air Force Base 



Air Force Test Center 



Air Force Materiel Command 



AFMC 



412th Test Wing
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying annual report of Sanchez Energy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael G. Long, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Michael G. LongMichael   G. LongSenior   Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal   Financial Officer)Date: March 30, 2012
News United States Air Force
 US, Turkey finalizing details of anti-ISIL airstrikesPublished Aug. 17, 2015
                        
                        By Cheryl Pellerin
                        
                        
                        DoD News, Defense Media Activity
                **WASHINGTON, (AFNS) --**
                The U.S. and Turkey are finalizing details of Turkey’s recently announced participation in the air campaign against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant in Syria, a U.S. Central Command spokesman said here Aug. 14.Col. Pat Ryder briefed reporters at the Pentagon on continuing operations in Iraq and Syria by coalition partners supporting Combined Joint Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve.On Aug. 12, the Pentagon announced that the U.S. had begun flying manned counter-ISIL missions from Incirlik Air Base, Turkey, and conducting airstrikes.This followed Turkey's announcement in July that it would open its bases for U.S. and coalition members’ air operations against ISIL, as part of deeper U.S.-Turkey counter-ISIL cooperation.“Turkey has been a welcome partner in terms of opening up Incirlik Air Base and allowing us to conduct manned and unmanned operations out of (the base),” Ryder told reporters.“They have definitely highlighted that they are committed to participating in the counter-ISIL air operations, they have stopped doing any counter-ISIL flights until we finalize ... how they will be part of the coalition air campaign,” Ryder continued.Six U F-16 Fighting Falcons and about 300 personnel arrived at Incirlik AB Aug. 9 to support Operation Inherent Resolve in Iraq and Syria, said Pentagon spokesman Navy Capt. Jeff Davis.The detachment is from the 31st Fighter Wing based at Aviano AB, Italy, according to the statement from U.S. European Command.centcom 



AFCENT 



Incirlik AB 



ISIL 



terrorism 



airstrike 



turkey
News United States Air Force
 AF Materiel Command to transition to AcqDemoPublished Dec. 12, 2015
                        
                        By Stacey Geiger
                        
                        
                        Air Force Materiel Command Public Affairs
                **WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS) --**
                About 13,000 Air Force Materiel Command non-bargaining unit civilian employees will transition to the Acquisition Workforce Personnel Demonstration Project pay system in June 2016, according to AFMC officials.
"This is a win-win for both employees and managers. It will support employee personal and professional growth, and for supervisors, it will give them more control and flexibility thereby enhancing management of the AFMC workforce," said Gen. Ellen Pawlikowski, the AFMC commander. "AcqDemo is designed to improve agility and effectiveness by allowing greater flexibilities with personnel processes and functions."
AcqDemo will cover mainly non-bargaining, supervisory and professional series employees. The command will continue to explore expanding it to all AFMC civilians.
Under AcqDemo, employees will no longer carry their GS designation and numbered grade. Instead, they will be placed in broadbands, or "pay bands," comparable to their current grade and salary. Any pay increases or performance awards will be based on each employee's contribution toward achieving their organization's mission.
"AcqDemo is an opportunity to improve the civilian personnel system to better accomplish the AFMC mission," said Ted Singer, the AFMC AcqDemo team lead. "AcqDemo will allow greater supervisory control over personnel processes and at the same time expand the opportunities available to employees through a more responsive and flexible personnel system. This project not only provides a system that retains, recognizes and rewards employees for their contribution but also supports their personal and professional growth."
The National Defense Authorization Act allowed the Defense Department to conduct a personnel demonstration project with its civilian acquisition workforce and AcqDemo was implemented in 1999. Edwards Air Force Base, California, has been a participant since its inception. The command will be implementing AcqDemo within the small workforce of both bargaining and non-bargaining employees at Arnold AFB, Tennessee, in an effort to demonstrate its effectiveness. Additionally, there will be some bargaining unit employees at several Air Force Installation Contracting Agency locations.
To implement, all affected employees and their supervisors will first receive AcqDemo training beginning in January 2016; dates and locations will be announced. 
For additional information on AcqDemo, click hereor visit to the DOD Civilian Acquisition Workforce Personnel Demonstration Project site.AFMC 



personnel 



civilian 



workforce
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 47 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.47
                                                 Agreed to March 1, 2007

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas the Medal of Honor is the highest award that can be bestowed to 
  a member of the Armed Forces for valor in action against an enemy 
  force;

Whereas the Medal of Honor is awarded by the President, in the name of 
  the Congress, to members of the Armed Forces who have distinguished 
  themselves conspicuously by gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of 
  their lives above and beyond the call of duty;

Whereas the United States will forever be in debt to the recipients of 
  the Medal of Honor for their bravery and sacrifice in times of war or 
  other armed conflict;

Whereas the Medal of Honor was first awarded on March 25, 1863, during 
  the Civil War;

Whereas, of the millions of men and women who have served in the Armed 
  Forces in war, military operations, or other armed conflicts, only 
  3,443 members have thus far been awarded the Medal of Honor;

Whereas 111 Medal of Honor recipients are still living as of January 1, 
  2007;

Whereas it is appropriate to commemorate and honor the recipients of 
  the Medal of Honor and to recognize their bravery and sacrifice for 
  the United States;

Whereas the designation of a National Medal of Honor Day would raise 
  the awareness of the American people regarding the significance and 
  meaning of the Medal of Honor and help focus the efforts of national, 
  State, and local organizations striving to foster public appreciation 
  and recognition of Medal of Honor recipients; and

Whereas March 25 would be an appropriate date to observe National Medal 
  of Honor Day: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That Congress--
        (1) recognizes the heroism and sacrifice of Medal of Honor 
    recipients for the United States;
        (2) recognizes the educational opportunity that a National 
    Medal of Honor Day would present to the American public; and
        (3) supports the goals and ideals of a National Medal of Honor 
    Day to celebrate and honor the contributions of Medal of Honor 
    recipients.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0099 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RUSTY DEWAYNE WAGONER ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 19 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 13 2020

07/13/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0099
583 A.2d 346

#### IN THE MATTER OF JAMES E. REKULAK, PRINCIPAL UTILITY MANAGEMENT ANALYST (PS1994R) v. DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL.

March 26, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the WFRBSCommercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C5 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, asTrustee, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor, CoreLogicCommercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, andNational Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant.

 

 

 

Dated: March 21, 2018

 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### Roseboro & Sons v. S. W. Thompson.

(No. 445, Op. Book No. 1, p. 203.)

Appeal from Lamar County.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 18. *Pleadings filed in one court, effect of, on transfer to another tribunal.*Where pleadings had been filed in the proper court (in this case under a special law), and *16upon change in the jurisdiction of the courts the case was transferred to the district court, it was error in this latter court to render judgment by default, and ignore the pleadings and issues tendered by the claimant to the property levied on. The district court, in view of claimant’s answer, should not have rendered judgment by default, but the case should have been called and tried in regular order.

April 19, 1877.

§ 19. *Motion for neto trial; writ of inquiry.*A motion for new trial made within two days after the execution of a writ of inquiry is in time. [Edwards v. James, 13 Tex. 52.] After a motion for new trial has been filed by the clerk, that officer is responsible that it be properly entered on the motion docket, and the rights of parties cannot be prejudiced by his permission to the attorney filing it to take it from his office.

Reversed and remanded.
<Page>


                                                                          [LOGO]

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 26 to the
registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 033-19421) (the "Registration
Statement") of our report dated February 13, 2003, relating to the financial
statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company, which appears in such
Registration Statement.  We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 4, 2003
583 A.2d 329

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STEPHEN GREGORY WILLIAMS.

February 27, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-370

)

WARREN SHANNON KEENE, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed May 23, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Lisa D. Campbell, 

Judge.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for

Appellant.

Arthur N. Eggers, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PRESIDENT
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the
undersigned President of Ironton Iron, Inc. (the Company), acting in
capacities equivalent to the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Doretha Christoph
Doretha J. Christoph
August 13, 2002

12
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Annual Report of China Mobile Games and Entertainment Group Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ken Fei Fu Chang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: April 26, 2013
|                     | 
|By:                  |  | /s/ Ken Fei Fu Chang                
|Name:                |  | Ken Fei Fu Chang                    
|Title:               |  | Director and Chief Financial Officer