alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Air Force releases senior master sergeant/23E8 promotion cycle statisticsPublished March 14, 2023
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Kiana Pearson
                        
                        
                        Air Force’s Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force officials have selected 1,629 master sergeants for promotion to senior master sergeant out of 16,031 eligible for a selection rate of 10.16% in the 23E8 promotion cycle, which includes supplemental promotion opportunities.

The average overall score for those selected was 396.05. Selectees’ average time in grade was 4.4 years and time in service was 17.88 years.

The promotion list is available on the **Enlisted Promotions** page of the Air Force Personnel Center website, the Air Force Portal and myPers. Airmen can access their score notices on the virtual Military Personnel Flight via the AFPC Secure page.

For more information about Air Force personnel programs, visit the **AFPC public website**.AFPC 



promotion 



LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Air Force’s Personnel Center 



senior master sergeant 



list 



statistics 



SNCO 



senior noncommissioned officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1119 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 477
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1119

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 8, 2007

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend title 36, United States Code, to revise the congressional 
charter of the Military Order of the Purple Heart of the United States 
  of America, Incorporated, to authorize associate membership in the 
 corporation for the spouse and siblings of a recipient of the Purple 
                              Heart medal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Purple Heart Family Equity Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP IN THE MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART 
              OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED.

    Section 140503(b) of title 36, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``parents and lineal descendants'' and inserting ``the 
parents, spouse, siblings, and lineal descendants''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 6, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 477

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1119

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend title 36, United States Code, to revise the congressional 
charter of the Military Order of the Purple Heart of the United States 
  of America, Incorporated, to authorize associate membership in the 
 corporation for the spouse and siblings of a recipient of the Purple 
                              Heart medal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 8, 2007

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1119 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to revise the congressional charter 

of the Military Order of the Purple Heart of the United States of 

America, Incorporated, to authorize associate membership in the corporation for the spouse of a recipient of the Purple Heart medal. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mrs. DAVIS of California (for herself, Ms. FOXX, Mr. BLUNT, Mrs. JONES of 

Ohio, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. CROWLEY, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. 

TANCREDO, Ms. KAPTUR, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. BERMAN, 

Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. FORTENBERRY, Mr. BUYER, Mr. 

SMITH of Nebraska, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Mr. HARE, Mr. 

SALAZAR, Mr. CAPUANO, and Mr. HONDA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to revise the congressional charter of the Military Order of the Purple Heart 

of the United States of America, Incorporated, to authorize associate membership in the corporation for the 

spouse of a recipient of the Purple Heart medal. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Purple Heart Family 

5 Equity Act of 2007’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1119 IH

1 SEC. 2. ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP IN THE MILITARY ORDER 

2 OF THE PURPLE HEART OF THE UNITED 

3 STATES OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED. 

4 Section 140503(b) of title 36, United States Code, 

5 is amended by striking ‘‘parents and lineal descendants’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘the parents, spouse, and lineal descend7 ants’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
#### J. H. Henry et al. v. Jessie Shain.

(No. 1587, Op. Book No. 2, p. 332.)

Appeal from Collin County.

Opinion by

Walker, R. S., P. J.

§ 1074. *Statement of facts; requisites of; effect of absence of.*A statement of the evidence adduced on the trial of a cause, made *ex parte*by the counsel for one only of the parties, and no evidence accompanying it of the approval of the judge who presided, can have no consideration whatever attached to it as a statement of facts. It is a well established rule that the charge of the judge below will not be revised unless there be a state*607ment of facts in the record, except the pleadings contain matter which shows the charge to be necessarily erroneous. [Bast v. Alford, 22 Tex. 399.] Or where there are no pleadings to support the verdict of the jury, and the issues in the pleadings do not warrant the charge to the jury. [Anding v. Perkins, 29 Tex. 348.] It is also a settled rule that, in the absence of a statement of facts, errors assigned upon the rulings of the court as to the admission of testimony will not be considered. [Hutchins v. Wade, 20 Tex. 7.]

April 23, 1881.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements for the six month period ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                         453
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               453
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          453
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       469,203
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,547)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   453
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               18
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                18
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            18
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   18
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                 ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Trans  Energy,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2006,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
James K. Abcouwer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/   JAMES K. ABCOUWER
----------------------------
James K. Abcouwer
Chief Executive Officer
June 22, 2006

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
#### C. A. Garrett et al. v. Mobile Life Ins. Co.

(No. 1706, Op. Book No. 2, p. 118.)

Appeal from Robertson County.

Opinion by

Walker, A. S., J.

§937. *Surety; guarantor; difference between.*A surety is usually bound with his principal in one and the same instrument, executed at the same time and on the same consideration. On the other hand, the contract of the guarantor is his own separate undertaking, in which the principal does not join. [Burge on Sureties, § 1.] A surety is in the first instance answerable for the debt for which he makes himself responsible, while the guarantor -is only liable when default is made by the party whose undertaking is guarantied. A guarantor is entitled to notice. [Burge on Sureties, §157.] A surety is liable upon the delivery of the obligation.

§ 938. *Agent; cannot dispute his principals authority.*In a suit' by an insurance company against its agent for money received by the agent belonging to the company, it was held that in the absence of other testimony the acts of the agent in pursuing a licensed business will be presumed to have been legal, and that he had the license for his company required by law, and that the agent *527should not be allowed to dispute the authority of the company to carry on its business in this state.

June 23, 1880.

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2013

p0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2013

147170 & (14)(15)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147170

COA: 314381

Calhoun CC: 09-003157-FC

SYLVESTER B. HUGULEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 11, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand and 

the motion for appointment of counsel are DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT (10)(a)


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the use in this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on Form N-4 (Registration Nos. 333-109206 and 811-02441)
of our report dated February 13, 2003 relating to the financial statements of
American General Life Insurance Company, which appear in such Registration
Statement. We also consent to the references to us under the heading "Financial
Statements" in such Registration Statement.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
--------------------------------------

Houston, Texas
December 16, 2003
761 A.2d 1180

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Raymond FOX, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Nov. 30, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted and the order of the Superior Court is reversed. *See Commonwealth v. Lussi,*562 Pa. 621, 757 A.2d 361 (2000).
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7600

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JORGE VILLARIEL, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-96-155-H, CA-99-303-5-H) Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 17, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jorge Villariel, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Jorge Villariel seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Villariel , Nos CR-96-155-H; CA99-303-5-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                               LAND O'LAKES, INC.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                    Year Ended December 31,
                                                                                    -----------------------
                                                                    2003          2002         2001        2000         1999
                                                                 ---------      -------      -------      -------      -------
<S>                                                              <C>            <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Earnings before income taxes ................................    $ 101,641      $96,685      $66,087      $90,032      $21,498
Plus: Fixed Charges (1) .....................................      100,168       93,475       67,269       63,009       53,602
Less: Capitalized interest ..................................            8          143          126        1,457        1,735
                                                                 -------------------------------------------------------------
        Earnings available to cover fixed charges                $ 201,801     $190,017     $133,230     $151,584      $73,365
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ..........................         2.0x         2.0x         2.0x         2.4x         1.4x


</TABLE>

(1) Fixed charges consist of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                                                                      -----------------------
                                                                      2003          2002         2001        2000         1999
                                                                   ---------      -------      -------      -------      -------
<S>                                                                <C>            <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Interest expense ............................................      $  82,948      $78,671      $55,684      $52,439      $44,702
Rentals (interest factor) ...................................         17,220       14,804       11,585       10,570        8,900
                                                                   --------------------------------------------------------------
    Total fixed charges .....................................      $ 100,168      $93,475      $67,269      $63,009      $53,602

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 117 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 117

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a 
 permanent hold harmless provision for sole community hospitals under 
    the Medicare prospective payment system for covered outpatient 
                          department services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
   the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a 
 permanent hold harmless provision for sole community hospitals under 
    the Medicare prospective payment system for covered outpatient 
                          department services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT HOLD HARMLESS FOR SOLE COMMUNITY HOSPITALS UNDER 
              THE MEDICARE PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR HOSPITAL 
              OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1833(t)(7)(D) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395l(t)(7)(D)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new clause:
                            ``(iii) Permanent hold harmless for sole 
                        community hospitals.--In the case of a sole 
                        community hospital (as defined in section 
                        1886(d)(5)(D)(iii)), for covered OPD services 
                        furnished after December 31, 2005, for which 
                        the PPS amount is less than the pre-BBA amount, 
                        the amount of payment under this subsection 
                        shall be increased by the amount of such 
                        difference.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to payment for OPD services furnished on and after 
January 1, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 85 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5371]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 RECESS

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 12 of rule I, the Chair 
declares the House in recess, subject to the call of the Chair.
  Accordingly (at 12 o'clock and 20 minutes p.m.), the House stood in 
recess subject to the call of the Chair.

                          ____________________
```
CGSH Comments 12/14/00


















December 17, 2003

To Bank of New York




Ladies and Gentlemen:




I, Raúl Humberto Zepeda Ruiz, in my capacity as “Delegado Fiduciario” of Banco Inbursa, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Inbursa (“Banco Inbursa”), have acted as counsel to Banco Inbursa, a private multiple purpose banking institution organized under the laws of the United Mexican States, in connection with that certain Trust Agreement dated as of March 18th, 1996, by and between Grupo Carso, S.A. de C.V. and Banco Inbursa (the “Trust”), and in relation to the registration of American Depositary Shares (ADSs) under the United States Securities Act of 1933, pursuant to the Registration Statement on Form F-6 originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (as ameded, the “Registration Statement”) by Carso Global Telecom, S. A. de C.V.




In preparing the opinion expressed below, I have examined and relied upon certificates of public officials and originals and/or copies authenticated to my satisfaction, of the former issuing Trust, and certain corporate records of Nacional Financiera, S.N.C., the former trustee. In addition, I have made such other investigation as I considered necessary or appropriate as a basis for the opinion herein stated. Based upon the foregoing, I am of the opinion that CPOs, as of the date hereof, when delivered by the CPO Trustee, upon transfer to the CPO Trustee are duly authorized and validly issued, fully paid Series A-1 Shares in accordance with the Trust will be validly issued, fully paid and entitling the holders thereof to the rights specified in the Trust, the Public Deed (of issuance of CPOs) and certificates, if any, representing such CPOs.




Each of the ADSs will represent one Ordinary Participation Certificate (each a “CPO”) issued by Banco Inbursa, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Inbursa, as Trustee (the “CPO Trustee”) created by the terms of the Trust. Each CPO representing financial interests in one Series A-1 Shares, without par value of Carso Globla Telecom, S.A. de C.V. (the “Company”), held in the CPO Trust, and each ADS representing two CPOs.




I hereby consent to the use of this opinion as Exhibit d-2 of the above mentioned Registration Statement. In giving this consent I do not admit that we are within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 if the United States Securities Act of 1933, or the rules or regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.




This opinion is limited to matters of Mexican law, and such specifically addressed hereto, no opinion whatsoever is issued with respect to the Registrations Statement.







Very truly yours,




/s/ Raúl Humberto Zepeda Ruiz

Name: Raúl Humberto Zepeda Ruiz




Title: Defegado Fiduciario