alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1100]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

   IN RECOGNITION OF THE ENFIELD SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL 
                       VOLUNTEERS IN ENFIELD, CT

                                 ______

                         HON. NANCY L. JOHNSON

                             of connecticut

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 23, 1995
  Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut. Mr. Speaker, it is with great pride and 
respect that I rise to commend the many students, parents, educators, 
and professionals who are members of the Enfield Substance Abuse 
Prevention Council and will be honored for their efforts to raise 
community awareness of substance abuse.
  This evening, at Enrico Fermi High School, the council will be 
hosting a celebration of youth to recognize the dedication and 
accomplishments of the volunteers, both children and adults, who have 
volunteered their time, energy, and experience to causes or projects 
whose mission is related to substance abuse prevention.
  Substance abuse prevention is critical to the health and prosperity 
of all citizens, and I express my appreciation to all of the volunteers 
who have worked together and daily demonstrate their commitment to the 
quality of life in Enfield, CT.

                          ____________________
```
Presidential Documents

57159 

Federal Register 

Vol. 75, No. 181 

Monday, September 20, 2010 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of September 16, 2010 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Persons Who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism 

On September 23, 2001, by Executive Order 13224, the President declared 

a national emergency with respect to persons who commit, threaten to 

commit, or support terrorism, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706). The President took this action 

to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, 

foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the grave 

acts of terrorism and threats of terrorism committed by foreign terrorists, 

including the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, in New York and 

Pennsylvania, and against the Pentagon, and the continuing and immediate 

threat of further attacks against United States nationals or the United States. 

Because the actions of persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support 

terrorism continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 

security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, the national 

emergency declared on September 23, 2001, and the measures adopted on 

that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond 

September 23, 2010. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the 

National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year 

the national emergency with respect to persons who commit, threaten to 

commit, or support terrorism. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

September 16, 2010. [FR Doc. 2010–23557 

Filed 9–17–10; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–W0–P 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PRESDOCO0OB#1.EPS</GPH>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                         182,670
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,485,376
<ALLOWANCES>                                    91,140
<INVENTORY>                                 28,791,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            48,770,025
<PP&E>                                      41,002,528
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,180,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             100,133,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,779,388
<BONDS>                                     10,462,314
<COMMON>                                        75,039
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,156,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               100,133,425
<SALES>                                     68,934,170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            68,934,170
<CGS>                                       54,641,948
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               54,641,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,885,498
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (53,261)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,273,767
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,298,636
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,118,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,180,636
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,180,636
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H5365-H5366]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          EXTENSION OF REMARKS

  By unanimous consent, permission to revise and extend remarks was 
granted to:
  (Mr. Obey, to include extraneous matter on the conference report on 
H.R. 1158 in the House today.)
  [[Page H5366]] (The following Members (at the request of Mr. Skaggs) 
and to include extraneous matter:)
  Mr. Poshard.
  Mr. Andrews.
  Ms. Lofgren.
  Mr. Lipinski.
  Mr. Bonior in two instances.
  Mr. Nadler.
  Mr. Mfume.
  Mr. Barcia.
  Mrs. Meek of Florida.
  Mr. Lantos.
  Mr. Torres in two instances.
  Mr. Williams.
  Mr. Filner.
  Mr. Pallone.
  Mr. Jacobs.
  Mr. Menendez.
  Mrs. Maloney in two instances.
  Mr. Ackerman.
  Mr. Olver.
  Mr. Coleman.
  Mr. Barrett of Wisconsin.
  Mrs. Collins of Illinois.
  Mr. Dixon.
  Mr. Hoyer.
  Mr. Manton.
  Mr. Ward.
  Mr. Richardson in two instances.
  (The following Members (at the request of Mr. Dickey) and to include 
extraneous matter:)
  Mr. Portman.
  Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut.
  Mr. Oxley.
  Mr. Burton of Indiana.
  Mr. Young of Alaska.
  Mr. Zimmer.
  Mr. Gunderson.
  Mr. Frelinghuysen.
  Mr. Goodling.
  Mr. Camp.
  Mr. Clinger.
  Mr. Fawell.
  Mr. Wolf.
  Mr. Tate.
  Mrs. Morella.
  Mr. Pombo.
  Mr. Bono.
  Mr. Gilman.
  Mr. Riggs.
  (The following Members (at the request of Mr. Dornan) and to include 
extraneous matter:)
  Mr. Peterson of Florida.
  Ms. Danner.
  Ms. Velazquez.

                          ____________________
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication                               ( print page 57477)                            Disorders Special Emphasis Panel, Clinical Trials.                    

*Date:*                         October 14, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Christine A. Livingston, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIDCD, 6120 Executive Blvd.—MSC 7180, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-8683,                         *livingsc@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

                        Dated:                        *September 15, 2010.*

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-23524 Filed 9-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                            TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of Engineered Support
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31,
2002 (the "Report"), I, Michael F. Shanahan, Sr., Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

            (1)  The Report complies with Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the
                 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,

            (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                 all material respects, the financial condition and results
                 of operations of the Company.

Date: September 16, 2002
      ----------------------------

By:   /s/ Michael F. Shanahan, Sr.
      ----------------------------
      Michael F. Shanahan, Sr.
      Chairman of the Board and
      Chief Executive Officer
#### Albert W. Lobdell et al. v. Thomas G. Horton.

*Sale*— Passing *of title*— Submission *to jury.*

"Whether the title to personal property passes or not, where something remains to be done before the exact amount to be paid therefor can be arrived at, depends upon the intention of the parties, and is a proper question for a jury.

Error to Mecosta. (Fuller, J.)

Argued June *21,*1888.

Decided October 19, 1888.

*Assumpsit.*Plaintiffs bring error.

Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*L. G. Palmer*and *N. W. Bush,*for appellants.

*Frank Dumon,*for defendant.

Ohamplin, J.

Plaintiffs brought *assumpsit*to recover ■on an account for goods sold and delivered.

*682Tbe declaration was upon the common counts. The defendant pleaded the general issue, with notice of set-off.

On the trial defendant admitted the correctness of plaintiffs' claim, subject, however, to be reduced by such set-off as he should be. able to prove.

The main contention was over a quantity of hemlock logs, which defendant claimed to have sold and delivered to plaintiffs, - and for which the plaintiffs were to pay him $3.75 for each thousand feet, as soon as they were sawed,, according to the mill tally.

The plaintiffs, on the contrary, claimed that the transaction was not an absolute sale, but was intended as a security for an indebtedness which defendant owed to. them.

The testimony in support of the theory of each party was properly submitted to the jury by the court, and they found in accordance with the defendant's theory.

Plaintiffs' claim that, because the logs were not to be paid for until the lumber was sawed and tallied, so as to. ascertain the quantity, the title did not pass.

The pith of the question lies in the fact that before the logs were sawed they were mostly destroyed 'by fire.

We have often decided that whether the title passed or not, where something remained to be done before the exact amount to be paid could be arrived at, depended upon the intention of the parties, and was a proper question of fact to be determined by a jury. Upon this point the charge was explicit, and we see no occasion for disturbing the verdict.

The judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.
758 A.2d 656

#### In the Matter of William G. DADE.

No. 601 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Aug. 18, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2000, William G. Dade having had his license to practice law in the Commonwealth of *131Virginia revoked by Order of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board entered on November 29, 1999; the said William G. Dade having been directed on June 26, 2000, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is

ORDERED that William G. Dade is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
In the Senate of the United States,

September 18, 2007.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 1124) entitled ‘‘An Act to extend the District of

Columbia College Access Act of 1999.’’, do pass with the following

AMENDMENT:

On page 2, after line 11, insert:

1 SEC. 2. MEANS TESTING.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3(c)(2) of the District of

3 Columbia College Access Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 1324; Public

4 Law 106–98) is amended—

5 (1) in subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘and’’ after

6 the semicolon at the end;

7 (2) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period

8 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

9 (3) by adding at the end the following:

10 ‘‘(G) is from a family with a taxable an11 nual income of less than $1,000,000.’’.
 †

2

HR 1124 EAS

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 5(c)(2) of the

2 District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 (113 Stat.

3 1328; Public Law 106–98) is amended by striking ‘‘through

4 (F)’’ and inserting ‘‘through (G)’’.

Attest:

Secretary.
110TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1124

AMENDMENT
581 A.2d 83

#### IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM J. MULKEEN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 19, 1990.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court that WILLIAM J. MULKEEN of ELIZABETH, who was suspended by Order of this Court filed September 18, 1990, has failed to pay costs incurred in connection with a prior disciplinary matter,

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM J. MULKEEN’s restoration to practice shall be subject, in addition to all other requirements, to the submission of satisfactory evidence of his payment to the Disciplinary Review Board of costs, interest, and a sanction of $250.00.
583 A.2d 308

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. NATHANIEL EXSON.

January 23, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### FEB 2 2004 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
DENNIS EUGENE SHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. CHARLES SIMMONS, Secretary of Corrections; MICHAEL A. NELSON, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-3303 (D. Kansas) (D.Ct. No. 03-CV-3196-GTV)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before SEYMOUR , MURPHY , and O’BRIEN , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). T he case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.1 We construe Shaw’s pro se pleadings liberally. Ledbetter v. City of

Topeka, Kan., 318 F.3d 1183, 1187 (10th Cir. 2003).

2 In pertinent part, Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-513 states : “(a) The following actions shall be brought within two years: . . . (4 ) An action for injury to the rights of another, not arising on contract, and not herein enumerated.” -2- Dennis Eugene Shaw, acting pro se, 1 appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as time barred. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm. On April 24, 2003, Shaw, an inmate at the Larned Co rrectional Mental Health Facility, filed suit alleging he was denied constitutionally adequate medical treatment. His § 1983 claim arises from the prison staff’s refusal to provide him with pain medication shortly after he injured his back in November 1996. By way of relief, he seeks compensatory and punitive damages of $1,500,000 from the defendants. Concluding Kansas’s two-year statute of limitations for personal injury controls the cause of action, the district court dismissed Shaw’s complaint as time-barred. We agree. It is well established that claims sought under § 1983 are subject to the statute of limitations for personal injury in effect in the state where the alleged violations occurred. See Garcia v. Wilson , 731 F.2d 640, 642-43, 651 (10th Cir.), aff’d, 471 U.S. 261 (1985). In Kansas, the applicable period of limitation is two years. Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60- 513(a)(4). 2 Because Shaw’s complaint, filed in April 2003, arose from injuries alleged to have occurred at least six years ago, and because he fails to address this issue in a meaningful way, his claims are time-barred.-3-

Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, we AFFIRMthe decision of the district court. Finally, we remind Mr. Shaw he remains obligated to make payments as directed by the district court until the entire balance of the filing fee is paid.
Entered by the Court: TERRENCE L. O’BRIEN United States Circuit Judge
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 02-10268

Summary Calendar

DANIEL EUGENE WILLIS; DANIEL'S CONTRACT SERVICES, INC., a Texas for

Profit Corporation,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

KERR-MCGEE OIL AND GAS CORPORATION; KERR-MCGEE CORPORATION; JOHN

O'NEAL; KERR-MCGEE OIL & GAS OFFSHORE, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas, Abilene Division

(1:01-CV-57)

October 29, 2002

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In April of 2001, Daniel Eugene Willis, individually, and

Daniel's Contract Services, Inc., a Texas Corporation of which

Daniel Eugene Willis was an officer and shareholder, (hereinafter
g:\opin-sc\02-10268.opn.1.wpd 2

jointly referred to as Plaintiffs) filed suit in the State District

Court of Stephens County, Texas, against Kerr-McGee Oil and Gas

Corporation, Kerr-McGee Corporation, Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Offshore,

LLC, and John O'Neal (hereinafter jointly referred to as

Defendants) asserting claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964. Plaintiffs asserted that Defendants engaged in

unlawful employment practices against Plaintiffs because of

Plaintiffs' race and color. Plaintiffs also asserted claims for

willful breach of contract in connection with a master service

agreement between Defendants and Daniel's Contract Services, Inc.

Defendants removed the suit to the U.S. District Court for the

Northern District of Texas pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b); and, six months later filed a

motion for summary judgment. The federal district court granted

such motion for summary judgment and Plaintiffs appeal.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts,

and relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated

by the district judge in his order filed January 24, 2002, we

AFFIRM the final judgment, that Plaintiffs take nothing against

Defendants.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1043]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE POLISH AMERICAN CONGRESS

                                 ______

                         HON. ROBERT A. BORSKI

                            of pennsylvania

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 16, 1995
  Mr. BORSKI. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize the Polish 
American Congress, eastern Pennsylvania district, as it celebrates its 
50th anniversary in Philadelphia this month.
  Since its formation, the Polish American Congress has been an 
outstanding organization in sourtheastern Pennsylvania and continues to 
be a leading force in the unity of Pennsylvania and the fostering of 
Polish traditions and culture.
  Over the last 50 years, the officers and members of the eastern 
Pennsylvania district have worked closely with the national 
organization in supporting its objectives. Members have proudly watched 
Poland gain her freedom from Communist Russia, and Polish Americans of 
all ages have supported cultural and educational events to demonstrate 
the pride in Polish heritage which will last for generations.
  There have been many joyous moments in the 50-year history of the 
eastern Pennsylvania district. The organization has been instrumental 
in commemorating Pulaski Day and Polish Constitution Day in the 
Philadelphia region and has played an integral role in establishing the 
Thaddeus Kosciuszko House as a national historical memorial, so that 
tourists worldwide can appreciate the unique role this Polish patriot 
played in our Nation's history.
  The Polish American Congress can also take special pride in 
sponsoring the Polish American Weekend at Penn's Landing, the largest 
ethnic event held along the riverfront in Philadelphia.
  Mr. Speaker, as a Polish American and Congressman of the 
Pennsylvania's Third District, I am proud to represent the many 
dedicated people who have given so much of their time to keep the 
Polish spirit alive in the Philadelphia region.

                          ____________________
```