alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1129]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         HONORING ESSAY WINNERS

                                 ______

                        HON. CHARLES E. SCHUMER

                              of new york

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, May 24, 1995
  Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. Speaker, one of the pleasures of serving in this 
body is the opportunity we occasionally get to recognize truly 
outstanding and talented citizens of this country. Today, I am 
especially pleased to recognize the winners of the fifth annual drug 
avoidance essay contest.
  The first place winners are Tracey Barnes of PS 93, Gloria Milan of 
PS 380, Jessica Schumer of PS 230, Aisha Matthew of PS 138, Danielle 
Moseley of PS 244, Shameka Jackson-Barrington of PS 214, Michael 
Falanga of PS 205, Alexis Legister of PS 139 Annex, Bryan Small of PS 
327, Jennifer Fringo of PS 86K. I am also pleased to acknowledge the 
runners up: Radiance Salem of PS 11, Latoya Sanabria of PS 257, Iasia 
Holloway of PS 124, Grace Berry of PS 221, Lauren Stambler of PS 114, 
Jamece Grey of PS 149, Meghan O'Brien of PS 127, Michael Albala of PS 
206, Stacy Adams of PS 298, Joseph Williams of PS 75K, Glenfield Browne 
of PS 305, Charnise Sutton of PS 297, Enas Ahmed of PS 131, Blas Brown 
of PS 167, Tristan Brathwaite of PS 268, Giselle Cabon of PS 158, 
Lyndsay Adesso of PS 204, Jason Wilk of PS 312, Candice McMeans of PS 
73, Juan Arcena of PS 384K.
  Reading over the essays I cannot help but think of how wise these 
young students are. They know the terrible cost of drugs on 
individuals, families, cities and our country. These essays challenge 
us to do better by out children; they deserve to grow up in a safe, 
drug-free environment. I know my colleagues in the House of 
Representatives will join me both in congratulating the winners and 
runners up of the drug-free essay contest, and in wishing them the best 
of luck in the future.

                          ____________________
```
[No. 44408-5-I.

Division One.

May 30, 2000.]

#### Paul Curtis, et al., *Respondents,*v. Dennis Chinn, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 97-2-18025-2, Jeffrey Michael Ramsdell, J., entered March 5, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Becker, A.C.J., concurred in by Coleman and Kennedy, JJ.
News United States Air Force
 Three bases identified as F-16 aggressor candidate basesPublished Nov. 19, 2014
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Air Force officials, on Nov. 19, announced Eielson Air Force Base and Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, and Nellis AFB, Nevada, as candidate bases to host the 18th Aggressor Squadron and its assigned 18 F-16 Fighting Falcons.  
The aggressors are currently based at Eielson AFB, which the Air Force recently announced is the preferred alternative for 48 F-35A Lightning II Conventional Takeoff and Landing Variant aircraft.
“Now that we have identified Eielson AFB as the preferred alternative for the (Pacific Air Forces) F-35s, we must determine whether Eielson AFB is still the best location for the 18th Aggressor Squadron’s F-16s or if another installation would be better suited for the mission.” said Timothy Bridges, the deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for installations. “We’ll be sending Headquarters Air Combat Command out to the three installations to complete site surveys.” 
Air Combat Command will conduct detailed, on-the-ground site surveys of each candidate base.  They will assess each location against operational and training requirements, potential impacts to existing missions, housing, infrastructure and manpower. Additionally, they will develop cost estimates to bed down the aircraft at each candidate base.  
Once the site surveys are completed, the secretary and chief of staff of the Air Force will select preferred and reasonable alternative bases for the aggressor mission. The Air Force expects to make that announcement in early 2015 and begin the environmental impact analysis process soon thereafter. 
“We look forward to the next phase when preferred and reasonable alternatives are announced and our candidate base communities have an opportunity to participate by providing input during the environmental impact analysis process,” Bridges said.
The 18th AGRS stood up Aug. 24, 2007. The 18 AGRS prepares Combat Air Force, joint and allied aircrews to meet the demanding requirements of air-to-air combat through challenging, realistic threat replication, training, test support, academics and feedback.*(Information courtesy of Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs)*basing decisions 



Eielson AFB 



Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson 



nellis afb 



ACC 



F-16 Fighting Falcon Related Links
        F-16 Fighting Falcon
                                Sept. 23, 2015
                                The F-16 Fighting Falcon is a compact, multi-role fighter aircraft. It is highly maneuverable and has proven itself in air-to-air combat and air-to-surface attack. It provides a relatively low-cost, high-performance weapon system for the United States and allied nations.
            
            F-35A Lightning II
                                April 11, 2014
                                The F-35A is the U.S. Air Force’s latest fifth-generation fighter. The F-35A will provide next-generation stealth, enhanced situational awareness, and reduced vulnerability for the United States and allied nations.
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1050-084, 8th Floor
401 South Tryon St.
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2011, by and among GS Mortgage Securities
Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association , as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator, and
Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series GSMS 2011-GC5 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive
Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
News United States Air Force
 Nominees sought for 2015 Joan Orr spouse, Verne Orr awardsPublished Aug. 26, 2014
                        
                        By Janis El Shabazz
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Personnel Center officials are now accepting nominations for the 2015 Air Force Association Joan Orr Air Force Spouse of the Year Award and the 2015 AFA Verne Orr Award.
The Joan Orr award honors significant contributions made by non-military spouses of Air Force military members. 
The nominee's spouse must be serving in the Air Force, active duty, Air National Guard or Air Force Reserve. Each major command, field operating agency or direct reporting may submit one nomination. Completed nomination packages are due to the AFPC by Jan. 31, 2015.
The AFA established the Verne Orr award in honor of former Secretary of the Air Force Verne Orr to recognize mission-oriented unit accomplishments and achievements that used personnel to their full potential in order to accomplish the mission.
Nominations, being accepted through Jan. 7, 2015, are open to all Air Force units and organizations regardless of size. Each MAJCOM, combatant command, FOA and DRU may submit only one nomination.
For both awards, organizations and base-level personnel must contact their MAJCOM, COCOM, FOA or DRU for applicable suspense dates and additional information regarding nomination procedures.
For more information about Air Force recognition programs and other personnel issues, visit the myPers website at https://mypers.af.mil.  To read more about the Verne Orr award, select "search all components" from the drop down menu and enter "12603" in the search window.AFPC 



Joan Orr spouse award 



Verne Orr award 



awards Related Links
        VERNE ORR
                                April 23, 2003
                                Served as secretary of the Air Force from Feb. 9, 1981 to Nov. 30, 1985.Verne Orr was the 14th secretary of the Air Force. He was born in 1916 in Des Moines, Iowa. He grew up in the Midwest and moved to California with his family about the time he entered high school. He graduated from Pomona
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 91 (Tuesday, June 6, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5612]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                        GETTING DOWN TO BUSINESS

  (Mr. GOSS asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. GOSS. Mr. Speaker, as colleagues return from what I hope was a 
productive work period, I also hope Members got a little chance for a 
rest, too, because it is now time for this House to get down to the 
business of reining in specific Federal spending.
  We have passed, as everybody knows, the landmark budget blueprint for 
reaching balance in our budget by the year 2002. That was a big effort. 
Now our committees are diving into the details, deciding where and how 
much to cut, to ensure that we fulfill that the problem of fiscal 
sanity does not go on and become fiscal insanity for our children and 
their children's children.
  I am sure this is going to be very hard. There are no easy decisions. 
There are a lot of tough decisions ahead, and probably some rude 
awakenings, too, but I think that is why we are here. I think we have a 
moral obligation to get it done. The gripers and whiners who have so 
long defended the status quo believe they can actually scare people 
into opposing our agenda for balancing the budget.
  Actually the status quo has brought us a deteriorating quality of 
life in America, and we all know it. As we prove our good faith in 
making government smaller, more efficient, and more accountable, the 
American people will support out efforts, so say the people in my 
district, and I think across the country as well.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5367]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                               AMENDMENTS

  Under clause 6 of rule XXIII, proposed amendments were submitted as 
follows:

                               H.R. 1561

                       Offered By: Mr. Funderburk

       Amendment No. 2: In section 2101(1)(A) (relating to 
     authorizations of appropriations for diplomatic and consular 
     programs of the Department of State) strike ``$1,728,797,000 
     for the fiscal year 1996 and $1,676,903,000 for the fiscal 
     year 1997'' and insert ``$1,555,917,300 for the fiscal year 
     1996 and $1,400,325,570 for the fiscal year 1997''.
       In section 2101(2)(A) (relating to authorizations of 
     appropriations for salaries and expenses of the Department of 
     State) strike ``$366,276,000 for the fiscal year 1996 and 
     $355,287,000 for the fiscal year 1997 '' and insert 
     ``$338,648, 400 for the fiscal year 1996 and $296,683,560 for 
     the fiscal year 1997''.
```
EXHIBIT 12.1



BEA Systems, Inc.



Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(in thousands)



|                                                   |  | Fiscal years ended January 31, |        
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | -------
|                                                   |  | 2003                           |        
|Income (loss) before income taxes                  |  |                                | 119,823
|Add fixed charges                                  |  |                                | 46,151 
|                                                   |  |                                |        
|Earnings (as defined)                              |  | $                              | 165,974
|                                                   |  |                                |        
|Fixed charges:                                     |  |                                |        
|Interest expense(1)                                |  |                                | 22,087 
|Portion of rent expense representative of interest |  |                                | 21,936 
|Amortization of debt premium and issuance costs    |  |                                | 2,128  
|                                                   |  |                                |        
|Total fixed charges                                |  | $                              | 46,151 
|                                                   |  |                                |        
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 |  |                                | 3.60   
|                                                   |  |                                |        

---

|* |  | Earnings (as defined) were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $4,268, $5,657 and $46,726 for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2002, 2000, and 1999,
respectively.
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(1) |  | Excludes debt conversion premium of $236 and $8,054 in fiscal 2001 and 2000, respectively, which is included in amortization of debt premium and issuance costs.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                         Washington, D.C.  20549
  
  
                               FORM 10-QSB/A1
  
  (Mark One)
  [X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  
  For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1996
  
  [ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
  OF 1934
  
  For the transition period from        to 
  
  Commission File Number 0-14213     
  
  
                       GLOBAL VENTURE FUNDING, INC.               
   
    (exact name of small business issuer as specified in its
charter)
  
  
  
    Colorado                               84-0990371   
(State or other jurisdiction of         (I.R.S. Employer  
incorporation or organization)         Identification No.)
  
  
  
                   2712 Echo Mesa Drive
                   Las Vegas,  NV  89134        
              (Address of Principal Executive Offices)
  


                             (702) 233-6638
                       (Issuer's telephone number)
  
  
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to 
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during 
the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the 
issuer was required to file such report), and (2) has been 
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 
days.  Yes   x    No      
 
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date.
  Class                       Outstanding at July 15, 1996
Common Stock $.0001 par value        2,782,513                              
    
                                                                  

_____________________________________________________________________
                   EXHIBIT TO AMENDMENT

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 10-QSB/A1

(a) Exhibits
         EX-27 Financial Data Schedule

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

                         SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its 
behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                  GLOBAL VENTURE FUNDING, INC.


Date: October 25, 1996             BY:   /s/  Robert M. Dolan
                                      President
582 A.2d 1264

#### IN THE MATTER OF SAMUEL ASBELL, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

December 24, 1990.

ORDER

Respondent SAMUEL ASBELL, of CAMDEN, having voluntarily withdrawn from the practice of law pending a determination of his medical fitness to practice law and pending the Court’s determination of an application by the Office of Attorney Ethics for his temporary suspension from the practice of law; and

The Court having issued an Order to Show Cause why respondent should not be temporarily suspended from the practice of law pursuant to *Rule*1:20-6(b)(1) or *Rule*1:20-5(b);

And the Court having heard the argument of counsel and having withheld action on the application pending the receipt of supplemental briefing by the parties and medical reports, which briefs and reports have now been submitted;

And the Court having duly considered the record before it;

And it appearing that application of *Rule*1:20-4(g) requires the imposition of restrictions on respondent’s practice of law;

It is ORDERED that the petition for a temporary suspension from the practice of law is denied; provided, however, that the following conditions shall be imposed pending the disposition of the ethics proceedings against SAMUEL ASBELL and until further Order of the Court:

1. Respondent shall not engage in the practice of law that involves any public office, or position, for profit; and

2. Respondent’s private practice of law shall be subject to appropriate conditions approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics, including, but not limited to, a proctorship pursuant to Administrative Guideline Number 28; and it is further

*547ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics and the Disciplinary Review Board shall accelerate the processing of the within ethics proceedings.
422 A.2d 1168

#### Commonwealth v. Nickol, Appellant.

Argued June 19, 1979.

Mark A. Peleak, for appellant; Anthony Lucadamo, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

*632Before HESTER, HOFFMAN and CATANIA, JJ.*

*

 President Judge Francis J. Catania of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, Pennsylvania, is sitting by designation.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Tom Hofer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Vendalux Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Vendalux Corporation.

By: /s/
   -----------------------------
Name: Tom Hofer
Title:   Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 85 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5371]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

REPORT ON RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1561, AMERICAN 
                     OVERSEAS INTERESTS ACT OF 1995

  Mr. GOSS, from the Committee on Rules, submitted a privileged report 
(Rept. No. 104-129) on the resolution (H. Res. 155) providing for 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 1561) to consolidate the foreign 
affairs agencies of the United States; to authorize appropriations for 
the Department of State and related agencies for fiscal years 1996 and 
1997; to responsibly reduce the authorizations of appropriations for 
United States foreign assistance programs for fiscal years 1996 and 
1997, and for other purposes, which was referred to the House Calendar 
and ordered to be printed.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 66 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 66

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
   of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the 
                               Holocaust.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2007

 Mr. Waxman (for himself, Mr. Lantos, Mr. Cannon, Mr. Cantor, and Mr. 
 LaTourette) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
   of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the 
                               Holocaust.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR HOLOCAUST DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE CEREMONY.

    The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on April 19, 
2007, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of 
remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the 
ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
                                 <all>
```