alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robt. P. Sherwood v. Galveston Real Estate and Loan Co.

(No. 341, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 321.)

Appeal from Galveston County.

March 27, 1878.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 694. *Appeal bond; independent executors or administrators.*The statute [Pas. Dig. art. 1503] which authorizes executors and administrators to appeal without surety has reference to bonded executors and administrators, and not to those who may be administering the trust without bond. The reason why those who are regularly bonded are not required to give security on appeal is that they have already given a bond with security to insure the rightful performance of the trust, and are therefore not required to give security on appeal when prosecuting or defending suits in their representative capacity. When an executor or administrator appeals in his own behalf from a judgment affecting him personally, he undoubtedly must give bond in like manner as any other person appealing from a judgment by which he conceives himself personally aggrieved. [Battle v. Howard, 13 Tex. 348.]

Appeal dismissed..
News United States Air Force
 ‘Prepping the Line’ provides additional resources, training for supervisorsPublished May 3, 2023
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force recently released an additional resource targeted to bridge the gap in fundamental education and training for new supervisors prior to assuming the duties of taking care of Airmen.**Prepping the Line** focuses on preparing front-line leaders the Air Force needs at every level in accordance with the Major Graded Areas: Executing the Mission, Leading People, Improving the Unit, and Managing Resources.

New supervisors can work with their leadership or trainer to complete the supplemental job qualification standard for supervisory roles, such as progressive motivation and discipline, conducting feedback, writing 1206s, evaluations and much more. This mission-focused resource is also intended to increase connection to the mission and the trust among supervisor-troop relationships.
Understanding all aspects of being a supervisor, such as knowing the helping agencies, allows front-line supervisors to build connections and take care of their Airmen.
"Prepping the Line is about arming Airmen with the skills and knowledge to successfully fill the positions and roles we expect them to assume throughout their career,” said Chief Master Sgt. Joseph Bogdan, enlisted force development division. “It provides Airmen with a guide that lets them collaborate with their supervision to ensure they are prepared for their duties, whether as a supervisor, a (noncommissioned officer in charge) or a flight chief.”
Currently, the JQS is optional; however, the Air Force is looking to implement an apprentice period after graduating from **Airman Leadership School**, where completing the JQS is required before supervising.
The next phase of Prepping the Line is to identify core managerial competencies, such as manpower, budget, etc. to prepare leaders for noncommissioned officer in charge, section chief and flight chief roles.
"As we release additional job qualification standards for the various positions, we look to integrate the voice of the field,” said Chief Master Sgt. Jalil Samavarchian, enlisted force development division. “Having a live feedback mechanism on the website can help us to continue improving these resources."
For suggestions or recommendations for the supervisor and future JQS, please email **AF.A1DI.EFD@us.af.mil**.

Bridging the gap on fundamental education and training.
            
            
            Photo Details /
                Download Hi-ResLR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



Prepping the Line 



front line 



supervisors 



training 



resources 



Major graded areas 



Airmen 



enlisted force development 



feedback 



ALS 



Airman Leadership School 



NCO 



noncommissioned officer Related Links
        Prepping the Line
[No. 24624-4-II.

Division Two.

May 12, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Dennis James Bailey, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 99-1-00109-5, John E Nichols, J., entered April 19, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Morgan and Houghton, JJ.
** **

**Exhibit 23.2**

** **

 

**Consent of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm** 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-205929) of Cynapsus Therapeutics Inc. (the “Company”), of our report dated April8, 2014, relating to the Company’s consolidated statement of financial position as at December 31, 2013, and the Company’sconsolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year endedDecember 31, 2013, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

McGovern,Hurley, Cunningham, LLP

 

/s/ McGovern, Hurley, Cunningham, LLP

 

Chartered Accountants

Licensed Public Accountants

 

Toronto, Canada

March 9, 2016
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1100 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To revise the boundary of the Carl Sandburg Home National 

Historic Site in the State of North Carolina, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

HR 1100 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Carl Sandburg Home 

3 National Historic Site Boundary Revision Act of 2007’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 For the purposes of this Act: 

6 (1) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map en7 titled ‘‘Sandburg Center Alternative’’ numbered 445/ 

8 80,017 and dated April 2007. 

9 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

10 the Secretary of the Interior. 

11 (3) HISTORIC SITE.—The term ‘‘Historic Site’’ 

12 means Carl Sandburg Home National Historic Site. 

13 SEC. 3. CARL SANDBURG HOME NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE 

14 BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT. 

15 (a) ACQUISITION AUTHORITY.—The Secretary may 

16 acquire from willing sellers by donation, purchase with do17 nated or appropriated funds, or exchange not more than 

18 110 acres of land, water, or interests in land and water, 

19 within the area depicted on the map, to be added to the 

20 Historic Site. 

21 (b) VISITOR CENTER.—To preserve the historic char22 acter and landscape of the site, the Secretary may also 

23 acquire up to five acres for the development of a visitor 

24 center and visitor parking area adjacent to or in the gen25 eral vicinity of the Historic Site. 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
3 

HR 1100 RFS

1 (c) BOUNDARY REVISION.—Upon acquisition of any 

2 land or interest in land under this section, the Secretary 

3 shall revise the boundary of the Historic Site to reflect 

4 the acquisition. 

5 (d) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map shall be on file 

6 and available for public inspection in the appropriate of7 fices of the National Park Service. 

8 (e) ADMINISTRATION.—Land added to the Historic 

9 Site by this section shall be administered as part of the 

10 Historic Site in accordance with applicable laws and regu11 lations. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
<Page>


                                                               [LOGO]

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the
registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 033-71686) (the "Registration
Statement") of our report dated February 13, 2003, relating to the financial
statements of First Fortis Life Insurance Company, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 4, 2003
News United States Air Force
 New York ANG leadership committed to fixing sexual harassment, assaultPublished April 23, 2014
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Michelle Gonzalez
                        
                        
                        National Guard Bureau
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                - Bare walls dominate the office décor, evidence that the newest tenant has recently moved in.
“I’m still getting used to it,” says Air Force Brig. Gen. Dawne Deskins who was recently promoted to brigadier general.
For Deskins, the sixth woman promoted to general in the New York Air National Guard, spearheading the Guard’s Sexual Assault Prevention and Response program for the 100,000 guardsmen is the latest opportunity in her 30-year career.
“It’s an exciting time to be in this program," Deskins said. "It’s a terrible thing that’s happening within our ranks and we’ve got to get our arms around it, because if we don’t, someone else will. I know our leadership all the way up is committed to fixing this.”
With her experience as a commander, Deskins was attracted to the opportunity to work as the special assistant to Air Force Lt. Gen. Stanley Clarke, the director of the Air National Guard, and influence the program at a higher level.
“As a commander, there was nothing more important to me than taking care of the people under my command," Deskins said. "I held that responsibility very closely and very dear to my heart. I was supposed to create an environment where people could come safely to work ... that they would not be in any kind of hostile work environment.”
Deskins’ military experience has been extremely positive and she says she wants every Airman to have that experience. 
Her goals are to improve training for commanders at all levels, improve the process of reporting across the Guard and improve success with local law enforcement.
“Our availability to train people is a little bit different,” Deskins says referring to the drill status of Guard members. “Ultimately we need to educate all of our Air National Guard leaders so that they can better implement these programs by understanding the nature of this crime, the people who commit it and the impact on the survivors so that we can support them.”
Deskins plans to look at the similarities of reporting across the Army, Air Force and the Guard to integrate reporting and improve the process.
“Ultimately, I would hope that as we go through our climate assessments ... we’ll see trust in the system,” Deskins said. “That we will find that eventually reports will go down because we’ve had an effect at the culture level.”SAPR 



sexual assault 



Air National Guard
[Cite as State ex rel. Mason v. Matia, 2011-Ohio-3068.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

No. 95866 

STATE OF OHIO, EX REL., 

WILLIAM D. MASON, 

CUYAHOGA COUNTY PROSECUTOR 

 

 

RELATOR

vs.

 HONORABLE JUDGE DAVID T. MATIA 

CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT 

OF COMMON PLEAS 

 

 RESPONDENT

 

JUDGMENT: 

WRITS DENIED
Writs of Mandamus and Procendendo 

Motion No. 445353 

Order No. 445354 

RELEASE DATE: June 21, 2011 

FOR RELATOR 

 

William D. Mason 

Cuyahoga County Prosecutor 

BY: Matthew E. Meyer 

Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 

The Justice Center, 8th Floor 

1200 Ontario Street 

Cleveland, Ohio 44113 

 

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT

Michael P. Maloney 

24441 Detroit Road 

Suite 300 

Westlake, Ohio 44145 

LARRY A. JONES, J.: 

{¶ 1} The relator, Cuyahoga County Prosecutor William Mason, commenced this 

mandamus and/or procedendo action against the respondent, Judge David T. Matia, to compel 

the judge to issue in the underlying case, State v. Hatfield, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas 
Court Case No. CR-532633, a journal entry reflecting his decision to grant a motion in limine 

excluding an audio tape of an alleged drug transaction. 

{¶ 2} A review of the docket in the underlying case shows that on May 13, 2011, the 

respondent issued the following journal entry in the underlying case: “Corrected entry of 

August 24, 2010: Defendant’s motion in limine is granted. Defendant sought to deny the state 

the opportunity to introduce and/or [sic] the tape recording made by the confidential informant 

during his alleged drug buy from the claimed defendant. The State of Ohio refused to identify 

the confidential informant during the discovery process and assured the court during a pre-trial 

conference that they would not be calling the confidential informant as a witness. As a result, 

the court granted the defendant’s motion in limine.” 

{¶ 3} This entry established that the relator has received his requested relief, a journal 

entry granting the motion in limine. Accordingly, this writ action is moot, and the court, sua 

sponte, dismisses this application for a writ of mandamus and/or precedendo. C osts assessed 

against the respondent. The court directs the C lerk of C ourt of the Eighth District C ourt of 

Appeals to serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. 

Civ.R. 58(B). 

 

LARRY A. JONES, JUDGE
MARY EILEEN KILBANE, A.J., and 

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J., CONCUR
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JEROME FITZPATRICK.

March 13, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### JAMES COTTON v. WORTHINGTON CORPORATION.

March 13, 1984.

Petition for certification denied. (See 192 *N.J.Super.*467)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 180 (Friday, September 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 56995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23308]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 44-2010]


Termination of Review of Sourcing Change, Foreign-Trade Subzone 
61H, Baxter Healthcare of Puerto Rico, (Inhalation Anesthetics 
Manufacturing), Guayama, PR

    Notice is hereby given of termination of a sourcing change review 
related to certain chemical ingredients at the manufacturing facility 
of Baxter Healthcare of Puerto Rico located in Guayama, Puerto Rico (75 
FR 40795-40796, 7/14/2010). The termination is based on an analysis of 
the record and resulting determination that no further action is 
warranted.

    Dated: September 3, 2010.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[FR Doc. 2010-23308 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [EG10-40-000; EG10-41-000; EG10-42-000; EG10-43-000; EG10-44-000; EG10-45-000; EG10-46-000; EG10-47-000; EG10-49-000; EG10-50-000]
 
 
 Taloga Wind, LLC
Docket Nos. EG10-40-000Stephentown Regulation Services, LLC
EG10-41-000Longview Power, LLC
EG10-42-000Alta Wind I, LLC
EG10-43-000Alta Wind II, LLC
EG10-44-000Alta Wind III, LLC
EG10-45-000Alta Wind IV, LLC
EG10-46-000Alta Wind V, LLC
EG10-47-000Synergics Roth Rock Wind Energy, LLC
EG10-49-000Synergics Roth Rock North Wind Energy, LLC
EG10-50-000
 Take notice that during the month of August 2010, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a). Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2010-23362 Filed 9-17-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6489

JERRY WILLIAM MCNEILL, JR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. FRANK L. PERRY , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:15

- hc

- 02173

- BO )

Submitted : July 2 7 , 2017 Decided: August 1, 2017

Before AGEE and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Jerry William McNeill, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Peter Andrew Regulski, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURI AM: Jerry William McNeill, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issue s a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies reli ef on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McNeill has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
News United States Air Force
 DoD rescinds COVID-19 vaccination mandatePublished Jan. 12, 2023
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                On Jan. 10, Secretary of Defense**Lloyd J. Austin III**rescinded the Aug. 24, 2021, memorandum mandating that members of the Armed Forces under Department of Defense authority be vaccinated against **COVID-19,** and the memorandum of Nov. 30, 2021, pertaining to the vaccination of National Guard and Reserve personnel. This rescission requirement was established by the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023.
The health and readiness of the Force are crucial to the Department's ability to defend our nation. Austin continues to encourage all service members, civilian employees, and contractor personnel to get vaccinated and boosted against COVID-19 to ensure Total Force readiness.
The full rescission memorandum can be found **here**.
The Secretary of the Air Force rescission memorandum can be found **here**.LR 



USAF 



AF 



DOD 



Air Force 



secretary of defense 



rescinded memorandum 



armed forces 



vaccination 



COVID-19 



National Guard 



Reserve 



National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 



NDAA Related Links
        Reserve Commander Rescinds COVID-19 Participation Limits
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                          9
                      
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         1,542
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         7,140
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       125,256
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         124,472
<LOANS>                                      195,363
<ALLOWANCE>                                      415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               355,525
<DEPOSITS>                                   224,783
<SHORT-TERM>                                  44,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,526
<LONG-TERM>                                   43,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         225
<OTHER-SE>                                    37,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               355,525
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                3,648
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              2,425
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  49
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               6,122
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2,655
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,252
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2,215
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     25
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,793
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,098
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,098
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  2.72
<LOANS-NON>                                      358
<LOANS-PAST>                                       0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 421
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     33
<RECOVERIES>                                       2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                415
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             415
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0 
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0
        


</TABLE>