alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
581 A.2d 505

#### IN THE MATTER OF LEONARD RUBIN, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

October 26, 1990.

CONSENT ORDER

THIS MATTER, having been opened to the Court by DAVID E. JOHNSON, JR., Director, Office of Attorney Ethics, and with the consent of the Respondent, Leonard Rubin, of Watchung, New Jersey, and it appearing that the Office of Attorney Ethics and Respondent having agreed to Respondent being temporarily suspended from the practice of law, together with the additional relief provided in this Order, pending final disposition of all ethics grievances before the District XIII Ethics Committee,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Leonard Rubin of Watchung, New Jersey, admitted to practice in this State in 1955, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, pending final determination of all grievances, and until further Order of the Court.

2. The Office of Attorney Ethics takes such protective action pursuant to R.1:20-11(c), as may be appropriate to gain possession and control of the legal files, records, practice and trust assets of Leonard Rubin wherever situate.

3. All funds, if any, presently existing in any New Jersey financial institution pursuant to R.1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement and shall be transmitted by the banks which are the present custodians thereof to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of this Court.

4. Leonard Rubin is hereby restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension.

5. Leonard Rubin is hereby restrained and enjoined from disbursing funds from any of the foregoing bank accounts.

*4526. Leonard Rubin shall comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics governing suspended, disbarred or resigned attorneys.
#### IN RE McELROY.

Patents.

The decision of the Commissioner of Patents, which rejected certain claims of an application for a patent for an electric signaling system, *affirmed.*

No. 632.

Patent Appeals.

Submitted November 7, 1910.

Decided December 5, 1910.

Hearing on an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, rejecting certain claims of an application for a patent..

*Affirmed.*

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Mr. Robert M. Pierson*and *Mr. Charles Neave*for appellant.

*Mr. Webster 8. Ruckman*for the Commissioner of Patents.

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The subject-matter of invention is an electrical signaling system in which a signal having an electro-magnetic interrupter device is placed in series with a circuit closer, in a principal circuit across high power direct current mains. It is for using a relatively high voltage current for ringing the bells in street cars for signals to the motorman.

The applicant, James E. McElroy, has appealed from the final rejection of the three following claims:

> “1. The combination with high power direct current mains such as those of a trolley circuit, of a high value substantially noninductive resistance, a circuit closer, and a signal having *94an electro-magnetic interrupter device, all in series in a principal circuit across said mains.

> “2. An electric signaling system comprising in combination with high power direct current mains such as those of trolley car operating circuit, a conductor across said mains, including a switch, a suitably wound circuit interrupting trembler signal, and a noninductive high resistance of such value as to substantially suppress the arc of rupture, said' elements being in series in the principal circuit so that the entire current flow of said conductor passes through the signal.

> “3. The combination with high power direct current mains, ,of a principal circuit across said mains, including the following instrumentalities in series, to wit: a high value resistance, adapted to pass an actuating current of negligible heating -and inductive effect, a circuit closer, and a signal having an electric magnetic interrupter device whose winding is multiplied in inverse ration to the value of said actuating current.”

The rejection was for want of patentable novelty, in view of the state of the art, and references were made to other patents and publications showing this.

The question was carefully considered by the successive tribunals of the Patent Office. The able argument on behalf of appellant has not convinced us of error in their conclusions. The grounds of objection are fully and ably stated in the several decisions referred to, and we could add nothing, to them by further discussion.

The decision will be affirmed, and the clerk will certify this decision to the Commissioner of Patents. *Affirmed.*
News United States Air Force
 DOD announces new actions to prevent suicide in the militaryPublished Sept. 29, 2023
                        
                        
                        DoD News
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                On September 28, 2023, Secretary of Defense **Lloyd Austin** released a memo directing urgent actions to address suicide in the military community, building upon two years of significant work towards suicide prevention across the Department of Defense.

Following the Secretary's establishment of the Suicide Prevention and Response Independent Review Committee in 2022, the SPRIRC conducted internal reviews of 11 military installations consisting of 457 focus groups and interviews with 2,106 Service members and 670 civilian staff. Guided by this review and existing research, the SPRIRC made 127 near- and long-term recommendations to address this critical problem within the ranks.

The Secretary's memo outlines the Department's campaign to reduce the number of suicides throughout the armed forces across five lines of effort — Foster a Supportive Environment, Improve the Delivery of Mental Health Care, Address Stigma and Other Barriers to Care, Revise Suicide Prevention Training, and Promote a Culture of Lethal Means Safety. The lines of effort are supported by numerous enabling tasks that will transform the Department's efforts on suicide prevention. These lines of effort are in line with the Secretary's Taking Care of Our People initiative and emphasize the Department's commitment to the well-being of the Total Force.

The Department remains committed to reducing the number of deaths by suicide throughout the armed forces and is pursuing an aggressive timeline for planning and implementation of the Secretary's five lines of effort, prioritizing the most impactful actions to set a solid foundation for long-term progress. The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness will oversee implementation efforts across the Department and will ensure implementation is conducted expediently and methodically. DoD aims to have full implementation of each line of effort by the end of fiscal year 2030.

The memo "New DoD Actions to Prevent Suicide in the Military" can be found **here**.

September is National Suicide Prevention Month. If you or a loved one are experiencing thoughts of suicide, you are not alone. Call the Veteran's Crisis Hotline at 9-8-8 and visit **https://www.veteranscrisisline.net/**LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



DOD 



Defense Department 



suicide 



prevention 



Mental health 



secretary of defense 



LLoyd Austin Related Links
        Veteran's Crisis Hotline
            
            New DoD Actions to Prevent Suicide in the Military
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements for Cambridge Advantaged Properties II Limited Partnership and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000771996
<NAME> Cambridge Advantaged Properties II Limited Partnership
<MULTIPLIER>                                1
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAR-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              MAR-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-25-1998
<CASH>                                      829,888
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            3,896,252
<PP&E>                                      114,551,275
<DEPRECIATION>                              46,024,367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              74,310,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,155,104
<BONDS>                                     90,230,620
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (30,075,011)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                75,310,713
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,953,435
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,714,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          5,316,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,574,630)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             502,534
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,544,064)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (352)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        

</TABLE>
#### CAROL CECERE v. HAROLD A. WILSON, JR.

March 27, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                         Quarter Ended               Nine Months Ended
                                                         September 25,                 September 25,
                                                   -------------------------   -------------------------
                                                       1996         1995           1996          1995
                                                       ----         ----           ----          ----
<S>                                                <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>        
Net Income .....................................    $7,884,000    $8,450,000   $24,842,000   $23,847,000


Shares used to compute
  earnings per share ...........................    19,222,200    19,215,000    19,219,588    19,215,000


Earnings Per Share .............................         $0.41         $0.44         $1.29         $1.24


Shares used to compute
  earnings per share including
  common stock equivalents - Primary Basis .....    19,293,877    19,418,328    19,356,351    19,401,394


Primary Earnings Per Share .....................         $0.41         $0.44         $1.28         $1.23


Shares used to compute
  earnings per share including
  common stock equivalents - Fully Diluted Basis    19,332,662    19,418,328    19,356,351    19,412,370


Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share ...............         $0.41         $0.44         $1.28         $1.23


</TABLE>


<PAGE>
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

October 31, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00731-CV

IN RE WILMA REYNOLDS AND CARL GORDON, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

300th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 48170

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 5, 2023, relators Wilma Reynolds and Carl Gordon filed a petition 

for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also 

Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable 

C.G. Dibrell, visiting judge of the 300th District Court of Brazoria County, to vacate 

his September 11, 2023 order dismissing the underlying case and October 6, 2023 

order granting real parties in interest’s request for attorney’s fees. 
2

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny 

relators’ amended motion for emergency stay. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Poissant.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Thomas W. Davison, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sontra Medical Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: February 16, 2005              
|                                     
|/s/    THOMAS W.
DAVISON             
|Thomas W. Davison                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# AFIMSC releases 2023 strategic plan

              - Published  March 26, 2023
              -                             By Shannon Carabajal                                                    
              - Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center Public Affairs

**JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, Texas (AFNS) --  **
The **Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center** recently released its **updated strategy**, adding a new focus area and synchronizing efforts across the center to enable better delivery of combat power and installation support.    
The Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center released an updated strategic plan for 2023, outlining priorities and associated goals the center is pursuing to optimize delivery of installation and mission support to the Air Force and Space Force. (U.S. Air Force graphic by Denny Yost)
Photo Details /                Download Hi-Res “Our installations are the vital power projection platforms that enable our forces and weapons systems to fight from anywhere in the world,” said **Maj. Gen. John Allen**, AFIMSC commander, in the plan forward. “Throughout this update to our strategic plan, we outline what we’re doing to support Airmen, **Guardians** and the installations they fight from to ensure we’re able to fly, fight and win.”The new major focus area, or line of effort, added for 2023 is “Amplify Warfighter Culture.” The LOE aims to educate and train installation and mission support Airmen about their roles in long-term strategic power competitions and the part their missions play in ensuring U.S. success.“Through the goals and objectives we’re pursuing for LOE 4 (Amplify Warfighter Culture), our global team will better understand how AFIMSC supports warfighters’ needs and counters adversary threats, now and in the future,” said **Col. Kelly Sams**, AFIMSC vice commander.In addition to the new LOE, the strategy includes updated goals and objectives that directly link to the **National Defense Strategy**, Secretary of the Air Force **Frank Kendall**’s **Operational Imperatives**, Air Force Chief of Staff **Gen. CQ Brown, Jr.**’s **Accelerate Change or Lose** initiative, and the **Air Force Materiel Command**’s **strategic lines of effort**.“Our work today is more important than ever with the nation facing growing competition from China, as it continues to develop and field advanced capabilities that threaten our country’s strategic interests and values,” Allen said. I’m confident this strategy will continue to guide our operations as we conduct our diverse missions across the Department of the Air Force in lock step with our national priorities.“I’m looking forward to a successful year ahead and send the AFIMSC team’s thanks to our Air Force and Space Force customers for their partnership in our collaborative mission operations.”

LRUSAFAFAir ForceAFIMSCAir Force Installation and Mission Support Center2023 Strategic Plancombat powerinstallation supportMaj. Gen. John AllenLOE 4Amplify Warfighter CultureNDSOperational ImperativesACOLspace forceOne Team One Fight
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 73 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to the process by which the House of Representatives chooses the President of the United States in the event no candidate receives a majority 

of the electoral votes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2007 

Mr. SHERMAN introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to the process by which the House of 

Representatives chooses the President of the United 

States in the event no candidate receives a majority 

of the electoral votes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 73 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. Whenever the right to choose the Presi5 dent devolves upon the House of Representatives, the 

6 Members of the House shall cast votes on an individual 

7 basis, and the candidate receiving the greatest number of 

8 votes cast by the Members shall be the President so long 

9 as such number is a majority of the votes cast. 

10 ‘‘SECTION 2. For purposes of a meeting of the House 

11 to cast votes under section 1, a majority of the House shall 

12 constitute a quorum.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
#### A. J. Fry v. Longstreet & Sedgwick.

(No. 178, Op. Book No. 1, p. 417.)

Error from Guadalupe County.

May 31, 1877.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 48. *Excessive judgment; remittitur.*Judgment by default was excessive. In the supreme court the attorney for plaintiffs below entered a remitter for the excess. If this had been done in the lower court before defendant had filed his petition and bond for- writ of error, the judgment would be affirmed; but as this was not done until defendant had taken steps, onerous in their nature, to correct the error, the defendant should not be taxed with costs in this court. [Chrisman v. Davenport, 21 Tex. 483; Cornelius v. Thompson, 27 Tex. 31; Edmundson v. Yates, 25 Tex. 373; Chadwick v. Meredith, 40 Tex. 380.]

' Reversed and rendered.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00370

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF H.H., H.H., AND

H.H., C HILDREN §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 89th District

Court

of Wichita Co unty ( 190,898

- C )

December 8, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice

Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth