alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Fairchild, McConnell tankers fuel NORAD exercisePublished June 4, 2015
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Benjamin W. Stratton
                        
                        
                        92nd Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs
                **EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska (AFNS) --**
                A tanker task force assembled from the 92nd Air Refueling Wing at Fairchild Air Force Base, Washington, and the 22nd ARW from McConnell AFB, Kansas, joined approximately 300 military personnel and 15 aircraft in exercise Amalgam Dart 15-2 May 26-June 1.
The annual North American Aerospace Defense Command exercise affords American and Canadian forces field training aimed at improving NORAD's operational capability in a binational environment.
"It's a great training event that equips our forces, American and Canadian alike, with real-world experience working alongside our NORAD partners in a safe training environment," said Royal Canadian Air Force Capt. Stephen Hinks, a 437rd Transport Squadron pilot. "It's great to see how well we work together as a tanker task force in the high Arctic."
Hinks, along with several tanker crews from Fairchild AFB and McConnell AFB, said the exercise was a great success, and it prepared and trained them for most contingencies that support NORAD's mission.
"It was a great experience working with the Canadians and really honing in on how we can best support each other at home and downrange," said Staff Sgt. Shawna Sims, a 92nd Air Refueling Squadron boom operator.
The exercise spanned two forward operating locations in Canada's Northwest Territories, two U.S. Air Force bases in Alaska, and a mobile radar site in Resolute, Nunavut, as well as the sky over much of NORAD's area of responsibility.
U.S. Air Force KC-135 Stratotankers, alongside RCAF CC-130T Hercules and CC-150T Polaris tanker crews, had numerous opportunities to practice bilateral aerial refueling with aircraft ranging from U.S. Air Force F-15 Eagles and RCAF CF-18 Hornets, to F-22 Raptors, an E-3 Sentry (AWACS) and a B-52H Stratofortress.
"Amalgam Dart helps to strengthen our homeland defensive strategies by practicing the plans we have developed and identifying where we can improve," said Maj. James Lamb, the co-tanker task force detachment commander and a 22nd Operations Group member.
This year's Amalgam Dart built on previous years' training successes when deploying air assets to the north exercising sovereignty operations in North America's northern aerospace and in the high Arctic.
Lamb said the team benefited from the many good lessons the exercise provided.
"This exercise brought together multiple U.S. tanker bases and forward operating assets, placing us side by side with our Canadian allies," he said. "We've had a great time putting this exercise together and executing the mission. With both countries working together, we can support more of the assets available to commanders for strategic homeland defense."AMC 



Eielson AFB 



Alaska 



PACAF 



refuel 



Canada 



McConnell AFB 



NORAD 



Fairchild AFB
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 180 (Friday, September 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1928-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]


Iowa; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Iowa (FEMA-1928-DR), dated July 27, 2010, and related 
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 7, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Michael R. 
Scott, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Thomas A. Hall as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-23271 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALBERT SMITH.

Feb. 4, 1980.

Petition for certification granted. (See 169 *N.J.Super.*98)
#### Leon & H. Blum v. Chas. W. Conrad.

(No. 1863, Op. Book No. 2, p. 534.)

Appeal from Dallas County.

Opinion by

Walker, R. S., P. J.

§ 1217. *Landlord’s lien; remedy where property subject to, has been sold.*Canthoil & Co. owed Leon & H. Blum $200 for rent of a house. They had property on the rented premises, and, among other things, two ice chests and a safe of the aggregate value of $200. Appellee Conrad purchased the ice chests and safe from Oanthon & Co. Appellants brought this suit against him to .recover $200 damages, alleging that he took and converted the property to his own use, with notice that appellants had a landlord’s lien thereon, etc. A trial of the case resulted in a verdict and judgment for Conrad. *Held,*that appellants’ suit was not maintainable; that the only right which appellants had to the property was the right to foreclose their landlord’s lien upon it, which they did not undertake to do, and showed no reason for not pursuing such remedy. Conrad did not become a tortfeasor by his purchase. Appellants sustained no damage by his purchase. If the property was subject to lien as claimed by them, the lien could have been still enforced against the same in the hands of Conrad. The proper remedy of appellants was to enforce their lien upon *700the property, and not a suit against Conrad for damages. The evidence showed that the property was within reach, and that, by the proper proceeding and diligence, appellants could have collected their debt out of the property subject to their lien, if they had any such lien. Under these circumstances they could not maintain their claim that they had been damaged by the purchase of Conrad.

October 26, 1881.

§ 1218. *Mortgaged property is subject to execution; damage does not necessarily result from sale of.*Mortgaged property may be taken in execution, subject to the lien of the mortgage. [Wooten v. Wheeler, 22 Tex. 338; Wright v. Henderson, 12 Tex. 43; Baker v. Clepper, 26 Tex. 629; Gillian v. Henderson, 12 Tex. 47.] And this although the mortgage contain a power of sale of the property by a trustee. [Wooten v. Wheeler, 22 Tex. 338.] From such a sale, or from a voluntary sale made by the mortgagor, or by the tenant, of property subject to lien, there does not necessarily result any damage to the beneficiary party to such liens. The damages, if any, must therefore be special, and to recover which they must be alleged and proved. [R. R. Co. v. Shirley. 45 Tex. 357; Moore v. Anderson, 30 Tex. 224.]

Affirmed.
#### Paul and Helen BILDERBACK et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CITY NATIONAL BANK & TRUST CO. OF COLUMBUS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 79-3380.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued Dec. 17, 1980.

Decided Feb. 5, 1981.

Rehearing Denied April 1, 1981.

*332Freeman T. Eagleson, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Alan Briggs, Columbus, Ohio, for defendant-appellee.

Before LIVELY, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS and PECK, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants filed this action against the appellee bank alleging violations of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601, et seq.1 and the Regulations issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 12 C.F.R. 226. District Judge Robert M. Duncan granted the motion of the bank for summary judgment, holding that appellants were precluded on grounds of res judicata from bringing this action. The pertinent facts are set forth in the comprehensive opinion of Judge Duncan, *Agnew v. City National Bank & Trust Co. of Columbus,*502 F.Supp. 760 (S.D.Ohio, 1979). We affirm.

Appellants were members of a class in an Ohio state court action which was settled by a consent decree determining issues relating to truth in lending along with many other claims growing out of the failure of a real estate development. Appellants contend that the judgment in the State court class action was procured by fraud and collusion. However, appellants took no steps in the State court to have the judgment in that court set aside for fraud or collusion. Neither did they appeal the order of the State court denying their motion to be removed from the class. The present action is a collateral attack on the State court judgment.

It also is argued by appellants that summary judgment was improper because they were prevented from completing discovery. We find this contention to be without merit. It is the law of this Circuit that “Prior to deciding ... a factual issue by means of summary judgment, a district court must provide both parties an opportunity to conduct some discovery.” *Vega v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Detroit,*622 F.2d 918, 926 (6th Cir. 1980). The record discloses that the district court entered no order limiting discovery by the appellants. The bank’s motion for summary judgment was filed November 29, 1977. The district court granted the motion on February 28, 1979. During the period of more than a year while the motion for *333summary judgment was pending, the appellants had ample opportunity to conduct discovery.

We conclude that the district court did not err in declining to relitigate the Consumer Credit Protection Act issues, which were decided adversely to appellants in the State court action, and correctly dismissed on grounds of res judicata.

Affirmed.

1

. Also popularly known as the “Truth in Lending Act.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Waterford Gaming Finance Corp.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   100
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                          90
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    74
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    55
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     19
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 19
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        19
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Maintaining the technological edgePublished Feb. 4, 2015
                        
                        By Ed Gulick
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Larry O. Spencer urged members of the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) to help the service maintain its technological edge at their winter board meeting Jan. 27.
“We need your help,” Spencer said. “We need the expertise you provide because it is really critical. Our budgets are shrinking, our capacity is shrinking and there’s no way to accomplish (our mission) with the budgets we have without technology and innovation.”
Spencer cited current modernization efforts, including the F-35A Lightning II, KC-46A Pegasus, long range strike bomber and the intercontinental ballistic missile fleet upgrade, as current costly programs the service must pay for. He then urged the group to look at how their studies can help the service save money while keeping its technological edge.
“We need your help to focus on what we can do versus what we can’t,” Spencer said. He then highlighted some technologies, such as measuring time in femtoseconds, hypersonics and quantum entanglement, as areas of advancements that need to be studied to determine how they can be used to advance the service’s mission.
“(The Air Force) cannot survive without you,” Spencer said. “The technology has leaped so fast, it’s hard for us to keep up with it. We want our adversaries to say, ‘Where did they get that and what are we going to do about it.’”
The SAB was tasked by Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James and Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. Mark A. Welsh III, to conduct studies on the cyber vulnerabilities of embedded systems in air and space systems, enhanced utility of unmanned air vehicles in contested and denied environments and utility of quantum systems for the Air Force.
The SAB is made up of 50 experts among the nation’s top civilian scientists and engineers who advise on matters of science and technology relating to the Air Force mission.
The current SAB studies will be completed by the end of June 2015, and then be briefed to the secretary of the Air Force, chief of staff of the Air Force and other Air Force senior leadership. The findings and recommendations of the SAB will then be used to shape and guide Air Force policy.
More information on the SAB and the 2015 studies, including the terms of reference, can be found by clicking here.Gen. Larry O. Spencer 



VCSAF 



SAB 



innovation 



Air Force Scientific Advisory Board Related Links
        GENERAL LARRY O. SPENCER
                                Aug. 3, 2015
                                Gen. Larry O. Spencer is Vice Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force, Washington, D.C.
## The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for th e 1 

## District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-3471

___________ United States of America, *

Appellee, * v. * District Court for the Charles Thirdkill, * (Unpublished)

Appellant. * * * Appeal from the United States * Western District of Missouri * *

___________ Submitted: May 20, 1997 Filed: June 6, 1997

___________ Before MUR PHY and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and ROSENBAUM, District Judge. 1

___________ PER CURIAM. Charles Thirdkill was convicted by a jury of conspiring to dist ribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine and heroin, and he wa s sentenced to 188 mont hs in prison. The only issue raised by Thirdkill on appeal is whether the United States’ use of preemptory challenges to strik e two African-American panel members from the jury was unconstitutional unde r Batson v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79 (1986) . After the district

## The H onorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for th e 2 

## Western District of Missouri. -2- court seated the all white jury, Thirdkill raised his Batson c hallenge and

2 Judge Limbaugh placed the burden on the prosecution to offer a race neutra l explanation for the strikes. The prosecutor stated he struck the firs t juror bec ause she was sleeping or nodding off during voir dire, and th e second because he indicated that he had heard defendant’s name and that hi s experience in the recording industry led him to have concerns about th e authenticity of audio tape recordings. The district court was satisfied by the explanations and concluded that there was no Batson violation . Finding no errors of law or fact, we affirm the judgment. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Christopher Nordling, certify that:

 

1.                          I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of CityCenter Holdings, LLC; and

 

2.                          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 
| April 30,   2013 | /S/ CHRISTOPHER NORDLING                                                                                                 |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | Christopher   Nordling                                                                                                   |
|                  | Executive   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Project CC, LLC, managing   Member of CityCenter Holdings, LLC |

 

----
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Cody Devon McGee, * From the 39th District Court

of Haskell County

Trial Court No. 6836.

Vs. No. 11-17-00122-CR * May 23, 2019

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, S.C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1003 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1003

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2007

                                Received

                             March 19, 2007

      Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 to 
 reauthorize the United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF UNITED STATES ADVISORY COMMISSION ON 
              PUBLIC DIPLOMACY.

    Section 1334 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 
1998 (22 U.S.C. 6553) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2006'' and 
inserting ``October 1, 2009''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 13, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
News United States Air Force
 Arming the RPAsPublished Aug. 27, 2015
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Joseph Swafford
                        
                        
                        455th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs
                **KANDAHAR AIRFIELD, Afghanistan (AFNS) --**
                Airmen from the 62nd Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron provide every munition that is loaded onto an MQ-1B Predator or MQ-9 Reaper at Kandahar Airfield; without them, the RPAs wouldn’t be able to provide combat airpower in Afghanistan.“Ammo at (Kandahar Airfield) helps support the flightline,” said Airman 1st Class Matthew Lopez, a 62nd ERS munitions systems technician. “We also manage, build, inspect and account for all munitions on the base ranging from 9 mm bullets that security forces use to the Hellfire missiles and GBU-49 bombs; if they need a delivery we will make it.”Arming the RPAs is important because it enables them to provide close air support to service members outside the wire.“It’s amazing that we can provide air support in the snap of a finger,” Lopez said. “We will be there to take out the enemy to support the service members on the ground. We’re glad that we can help support the mission.” Being deployed to a combat zone can give the munitions Airmen a greater sense of accomplishment from the training mission at home station.“Being here renews the sense of this is what we train for, this is what we are meant to do, this is why we signed up,” said Lt. Col. Michael E. Navicky, the 62nd ERS commander. “You’re using live explosives and we’re here to help protect our own in future occurrences. Back home, it’s another day, another dollar. It’s fulfilling, but you know it’s not the real reason why you’re there. Coming out here to the (area of responsibility), this is why we’re here.”MQ-9 Reaper 



Predator 



Reaper 



RPA 



Remotely Piloted Aircraft 



Kandahar Airfield 



Afghanistan 



ammo 



MQ-1B Predator