alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Renal Care Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
M. Dill, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ David M. Dill
----------------------------------
David M. Dill
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
May 4, 2005
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Veronica Kelly, :

Petitioner :

:

v. :

: Workers' Compensation Appeal : Board (Commonwealth of : Pennsylvania), : Respondent : No. 138 C.D. 2014

O R D E R

NOW, September 2, 2014

, having considered petitioner’s application for

re argument

, and respondent’ s response in opposition thereto, the application is denied.

BY THE COURT:

DAN PELLEGRINI,

President Judge
News United States Air Force
 AFRL’s THOR hammers drones in new video animationPublished June 16, 2021
                        
                        By Joanne Perkins
                        
                        
                        Air Force Research Laboratory
                **KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE, N.M. (AFNS) --**
                The **Air Force Research Laboratory** has created a new video animation that realistically depicts a Tactical High-power Operational Responder, or THOR, destroying swarms of enemy drones in a base defense scenario.
In an effort to counter the increasing threat posed by enemy drones and other airborne threats, the Air Force developed the THOR.
THOR is a prototype Directed Energy weapon used to disable the electronics in drones, and was specifically engineered to counter multiple targets – such as a drone swarm – with rapid results.
High energy lasers kill one target at a time, and high powered microwaves can kill groups or swarms, which is one reason THOR offers a unique capability.
“The system output is powerful radio wave bursts, which offer a greater engagement range than bullets or nets, and its effects are silent and instantaneous,” said Amber Anderson, THOR program manager .
Anderson went on to explain THOR is housed in a 20-foot shipping unit, can be transported in a military cargo plane and assembled by just two people.
“Drones represent an emerging threat to U.S. military bases, personnel and infrastructure, and it is THOR’s mission to keep them safe, at close range and from a distance,” Anderson said.





THOR is a prototype Directed Energy weapon used to disable the electronics in drones, and was specifically engineered to counter 
multiple targets – such as a drone swarm – with rapid results. (U.S. Air Force video animation)LR 



USAF 



AF 



Air Force 



THOR 



Tactical High-power Operational Responder 



Air Force Research Laboratory 



AFRL 



Air Force Materiel Command 



AFMC 



directed energy weapon 



drones 



high energy lasers 



high powered microwaves
No. 11,801.

#### Gallimore et al. *v.*Blankenship et al.

Supreme *Court.*— Motion *to Tax Costs.*— Bill *of Exceptions.*— Practice.—Where the grounds of a motion to tax costs, and the exception to a ruling thereon, are not shown by a bill of exceptions, no question is before the Supreme Court in relation to the ruling.

Same.' — ■ *Weight of Evidence.*— If the evidence is conflicting, the Supreme Court will not undertake to determine the preponderance.

From the Morgan Circuit Court.

*G. A. Adams*and *J. 8. Newby,*for appellants.

*G. W. Grubbs*and *M. H. Parks,*for appellees.

*391Filed. Jan. 9, 1885.

Black, C. —

The appellees filed their petition for drainage, under the act of April 8th, 1881, R. S. 1881, section 4273, *et seq.,*as amended in 1883, Acts 1883, p. 173.

The commissioners of drainage having made their report, favorable to the construction of the ditch, the appellees, ■owners of lands to be affected, remonstrated against the report, for various grounds of remonstrance, not including the first statutory ground. Acts 1883, p. 176, section 3. ,

The remonstrances were tried by the court, the finding being against them, except that it was found that the assessment against the land of one remonstrator should be reduced in a certain amount, and that this amount should be added to the assessment against certain other land affected. The court made its order establishing the proposed work, approving the assessments as so modified, and directing one of the commissioners to construct and make the proposed work.

Under an assignment that the court erred in overruling the motion of the demonstrators for á' new trial, the appellants have discussed the question of the sufficiency of the evidence.

We have carefully read the evidence, and we find that it supports the finding. As to some of the facts there was conflict in the testimony, but we can not undertake to determine the preponderance. n

The appellants have also assigned as error the overruling ■of their motion to tax the *costs;*but the grounds of the motion .and the exception to the ruling thereon not being shown by bill of exceptions, no question is before us in relation to this ruling. *Urton*v. *Luckey,*17 Ind. 213; *Tilman*v. *Harter,*38 Ind. *1; State*v. *Saxon,*42 Ind. 484.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Pee Cxjeiam. — It is ordered, upon the foregoing opinion, that the judgment be affirmed, at the costs of the appellants.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FELIX NUNEZ.

March 27, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

Calendar No. 112 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 312 

[Report No. 113–58] 

To adjust the boundary of the Carson National Forest, New Mexico. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2013 

Mr. UDALL of New Mexico (for himself and Mr. HEINRICH) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

JUNE 27, 2013 

Reported by Mr. WYDEN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To adjust the boundary of the Carson National Forest, New 

Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Carson National For5 est Boundary Adjustment Act of 2013’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 312 RS

1 SEC. 2. CARSON NATIONAL FOREST BOUNDARY ADJUST2 MENT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The boundary of the Carson Na4 tional Forest in the State of New Mexico is adjusted to 

5 incorporate the approximately 4,990 acres of land gen6 erally depicted as ‘‘Miranda Canyon Boundary’’ on the 

7 map entitled ‘‘Carson National Forest Boundary Adjust8 ment’’ and dated September 21, 2010. 

9 (b) LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND.—For 

10 purposes of section 7 of the Land and Water Conservation 

11 Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 4601–9), the boundaries 

12 of the Carson National Forest, as modified under sub13 section (a), shall be considered to be the boundaries of 

14 the Carson National Forest as in existence on January 

15 1, 1965. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 112 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 312 

[Report No. 113–58] 

A BILL 

To adjust the boundary of the Carson National 

Forest, New Mexico. 

JUNE 27, 2013 

Reported without amendment 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EX-35.4
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
1585 Broadway
New York, New York 10036


RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
Commercial Mortgage Pass-through Certificates Series 2011-C3


Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2011 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Custodian ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for
the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

     (a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of
     its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's
     supervision; and

     (b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells
     Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
     material respects throughout the Reporting Period.


February 14, 2014


/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sontra Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
W. Davison, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (s) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (s) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:     /s/ Thomas W. Davison
        ------------------------------------
Name:   Thomas W. Davison
Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by (s) 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

In connection with the Annual Report of Sontra Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sean F.
Moran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(s) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (s) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:     /s/ Sean F. Moran
        ------------------------------------
Name:   Sean F. Moran
Title:  Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by (s) 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES HYRES, HERBERT E. DOLAN AND MICHAEL RYTELEWSKI.

April 18, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 93 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.93

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
                   Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RENEWAL OF IMPORT RESTRICTIONS UNDER THE BURMESE FREEDOM AND 
              DEMOCRACY ACT OF 2003.

    (a) In General.--Congress approves the renewal of the import 
restrictions contained in section 3(a)(1) of the Burmese Freedom and 
Democracy Act of 2003.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--This joint resolution shall be deemed to 
be a ``renewal resolution'' for purposes of section 9 of the Burmese 
Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN COBRA FEES.

    Section 13031(j)(3)(B)(i) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(j)(3)(B)(i)) is amended by 
striking ``September 30, 2017'' and inserting ``October 7, 2017''.

SEC. 3. TIME FOR PAYMENT OF CORPORATE ESTIMATED TAXES.

    The percentage under subparagraph (C) of section 401(1) of the Tax 
Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 in effect on the 
date of the enactment of this Act is increased by 0.25 percentage 
points.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This joint resolution and the amendments made by this joint 
resolution shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this joint 
resolution or July 26, 2008, whichever occurs first.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 31.02

                                   Certification

I, Tom Hofer, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Vendalux
Corporation

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report(the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors ( or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls'
and

Date: March 10, 2005

By: /s/
   --------------------------------
   Tom Hofer
   (Chief Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 82 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6767]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            MORNING BUSINESS

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, there will now be a 
period for the transaction of morning business not to extend beyond the 
hour of 10:30 a.m., with Senators permitted to speak therein for not to 
exceed 5 minutes each.
  The Senator from Illinois.
  (The remarks of Mr. Simon pertaining to the introduction of S. 811 
are located in today's Record under ``Statements on Introduced Bills 
and Joint Resolutions.'')
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Pennsylvania.

                          ____________________
```
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 43 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Increasing the statutory limit on the public debt. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United 

4 States Code, is amended by striking out the dollar limitamstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

HJ 43 RFS 

1 tion contained in such subsection and inserting in lieu 

2 thereof $9,815,000,000,000. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 17, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 

By DEBORAH M. SPRIGGS, 

Deputy Clerk. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,023
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,167
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,191
<PP&E>                                          11,412
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,661
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,067
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,713
<OTHER-SE>                                          94
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,037
<SALES>                                         28,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,343
<CGS>                                           17,394
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    41
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 576
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       687
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,963
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,276
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CHARLES PAYNE, JR.

February 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5555]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Texas [Mr. Doggett] is recognized for 5 minutes.
  [Mr. DOGGETT addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2934 

To prohibit trespassing on critical infrastructure used in or affecting 

interstate commerce to commit a criminal offense. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2014 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit trespassing on critical infrastructure used in 

or affecting interstate commerce to commit a criminal 

offense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRESPASSING ON CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE 

4 USED IN OR AFFECTING INTERSTATE COM5 MERCE TO COMMIT CRIME. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 65 of title 18, United 

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2934 IS

1 ‘‘§ 1370. Trespassing on critical infrastructure used in 

2 or affecting interstate commerce to com3 mit crime 

4 ‘‘(a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘critical 

5 infrastructure’— 

6 ‘‘(1) means physical systems and assets so vital 

7 to the United States that the incapacity or destruc8 tion of such systems and assets would have a debili9 tating impact on security, national economic secu10 rity, national public health or safety, or any com11 bination of those matters; and 

12 ‘‘(2) includes a landmark, structure, or other 

13 object— 

14 ‘‘(A) declared to be a national monument 

15 under section 2 of the Act of June 8, 1906 

16 (commonly known as the ‘Antiquities Act of 

17 1906’) (16 U.S.C. 431); or 

18 ‘‘(B) established as a national monument 

19 by an Act of Congress. 

20 ‘‘(b) PROHIBITION.—It shall be unlawful to know21 ingly go upon on any critical infrastructure used in or af22 fecting interstate commerce, with intent to commit a 

23 criminal offense. 

24 ‘‘(c) PENALTY.—Any person who violates subsection 

25 (b) shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not 

26 more than 5 years, or both.’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2934 IS

1 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

2 The table of sections for chapter 65 of title 18, United 

3 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing: 

‘‘1370. Trespassing on critical infrastructure used in or affecting interstate commerce to commit crime.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS