alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 379 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1126 

[Report No. 110–181] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 13, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2007 

Reported by Mr. BINGAMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation 

and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS. 

4 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

5 9 of the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and 

6 Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988 (15 U.S.C. 

7 5108) is amended to read as follows: 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1126 RS

1 ‘‘SEC. 9. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sec3 retary to carry out this Act $12,000,000 for each of the 

4 fiscal years 2008 through 2012.’’. 

5 (b) STEEL PROJECT PRIORITIES.—Section 4(c)(1) of 

6 the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and Tech7 nology Competitiveness Act of 1988 (15 U.S.C. 

8 5103(c)(1)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (H), by striking ‘‘coatings 

10 for sheet steels’’ and inserting ‘‘sheet and bar 

11 steels’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub13 paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(K) The development of technologies 

15 which reduce greenhouse gas emissions.’’. 

16 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The Steel and 

17 Aluminum Energy Conservation and Technology Competi18 tiveness Act of 1988 is further amended— 

19 (1) by striking section 7 (15 U.S.C. 5106); and 

20 (2) in section 8 (15 U.S.C. 5107), by inserting 

21 ‘‘, beginning with fiscal year 2008,’’ after ‘‘close of 

22 each fiscal year’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Calendar No. 379 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1126 

[Report No. 110

–181] 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the Steel and Aluminum Energy 

Act of 1988. Conservation and Technology Competitiveness 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Doolittle Raiders join memorial wreath-laying

              - Published  Nov. 9, 2013
              -                             By Desiree N. Palacios                                                    
              - Air Force News Service

**WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS) --  **
The remaining Doolittle Raiders gathered at the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force Nov. 9 to partake in a wreath-laying ceremony at the Doolittle Raider memorial in Memorial Park here, followed by a flyover of B-25 aircraft.

 

The speakers of the memorial tribute include retired Lt. Col. Richard E. Cole, Acting Secretary of the Air Force Eric Fanning and Museum Director, retired Lt. Gen. Jack Hudson.

 

“The Doolittle Raiders are an example to all Americans and all Airmen,” Fanning said. “That even in our darkest days there are some among us who have the courage to step forward and say, ‘Send me.’  We owe them our eternal respect and gratitude. Gentlemen, thank you for what you did for your country those many years ago, for representing all those who served with you and for being an inspiration to the rest of us everyday since then.”

 

Cole also spoke during the event. 

 

“We all shared the same risk and had no realization of the positive effect on our effort and on the morale of the Americans at the time of great national peril," he said. "We are grateful we had the opportunity to serve and are mindful that our nation benefited from our service. Thank you for joining us today.”

 

The ceremony was attended by three of the four living Doolittle Tokyo Raiders: retired Lt. Col. Richard “Dick” E. Cole, the copilot of Aircraft No. 1; Lt. Col. Edward J. Saylor, the engineer-gunner of Aircraft No. 7; and Staff Sgt. David J. Thatcher, the engineer-gunner of Aircraft No. 7. The fourth living Doolittle Raider, retired Lt. Col. Robert L. Hite, the copilot of Aircraft No. 16, could not attend the ceremony due to health issues. 

 

The Doolittle Raiders Final Toast Ceremony was streamed via the Air Force and The National Museum’s Web sites and you can get more information about the toast here.

 

 

Wright-Patterson Air Force BaseOhiofinal reunionAir Force History Museumdoolittle raiders

#             Related Links        

-  Doolittle raiders honored with final toast
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# DATE AND TIME:

 Friday, September 24, 2010; 9:30 a.m. EDT

# PLACE:

 624 9th St., NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

## Meeting Agenda

This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Program Planning
      - Approval of New Black Panther Party Enforcement Report
      - Consideration of Findings and Recommendations for Briefing Report on Health Care Disparities
      - Consideration of FY 2011 Enforcement Report Topic
      - Consideration of Concept Paper for Briefing on the Department of Education's Investigation of Disparate Impact in Student Discipline
      - Consideration of Policy on Commissioner Statements and Rebuttals
      - Update on Sex Discrimination in Liberal Arts College Admissions Project—Some of the discussion of this agenda item may be held in closed session.
      - Update on Clearinghouse Project

III. State Advisory Committee Issues
      - Maine SAC
      - New Mexico SAC

IV. Approval of Minutes of September 10 Meeting

V. Staff Director's Report

VI. Announcements

VII. Adjourn

# CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

Dated: September 13, 2010.

David Blackwood,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2010-23184 Filed 9-13-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23616]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER10-2378-000; ER10-2379-000]


MATEP Limited Partnership; MATEP LLC; Supplemental Notice That 
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 
204 Authorization

September 14, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
MATEP Limited Partnership and MATEP LLC's application for market-based 
rate authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 4, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#df999a8d9c90b1b3b6b1ba8caaafafb0adab9fb9baadbcf1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81c7c4d3c2ceefede8efe4d2f4f1f1eef3f5c1e7e4f3e2afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a>., or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-23616 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
News United States Air Force
 Airmen share aerial refueling tactics with Royal Australian AFPublished July 13, 2015
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Alexander Martinez
                        
                        
                        Combined Joint Information Bureau - Darwin
                **ROYAL AUSTRALIAN AIR FORCE BASE DARWIN, Australia (AFNS) --**
                U.S. Air Force members demonstrated forward aerial refueling tactics with Australian Army and Royal Australian Air Force personnel July 8 during Talisman Sabre 2015.
The training demonstration helped provide Australian forces with the knowledge to establish similar capabilities for their future operations. 
“We’re a forward area fuel extension, so we can set up anywhere, such as a farmer’s field or on a remote airstrip and act as a mobile gas station where aircraft can stop, refuel and either continue their mission or get home safely,” said Staff Sgt. John Dillard, an 18th Logistics Readiness Squadron fuels specialist. “They’re in the process of rebuilding their forward aerial refueling teams, so this allows us to show them what we have and they can use what ideas they like most and tailor it to their missions.”
During the demonstration, members of the 353rd Special Operations Group and fuels specialists from the 18th LRS went through the steps they would use to rapidly deploy a forward area manifold cart and hook up fuel hoses from their aircraft to a helicopter. 
A forward area manifold cart is a large mobile generator that pumps fuel out of an aircraft and delivers it to aircraft in need. The cart has the capability to fuel up to three aircraft at the same time.  
“We’re interested in developing this capability, and this exercise is a fantastic opportunity to see and learn while the Americans are here and able to demonstrate their processes,” said Australian Army Lt. Col. Tim Connolly, the commanding officer of the 6th Aviation Regiment. “The 353rd SOG has been incredibly helpful and open to sharing their operations. The U.S. and Australia share a fantastically strong alliance, and this is a way to improve our interoperability and commonality, and we can work together in the future with common procedures.”
Col. Clay Freeman, the 353rd SOG and Combined Joint Special Operations Air Component commander, said the training is valuable for the U.S. and Australia and highlights the alliance between the two nations.
“This has been outstanding,” Freeman said. “The focus of our exercise objectives is interoperability and integration with our Australian allies. It’s been a great experience with everyone working hard and having a positive attitude. Our ability to work together and share knowledge allows us to function even better as a combined force.”
Talisman Sabre 2015 is being conducted in multiple locations in both the U.S. and Australia, and provides an opportunity to conduct operations in a combined, joint and interagency environment.joint 



training 



refueling 



PACAF 



Australian Army 



Talisman Sabre 



Royal Australian air force
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              QUARTER ENDED                                SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                 JUNE 25,                                      JUNE 25,
                                                       ---------------------------                   ---------------------------
                                                       1998                   1997                   1998                   1997
                                                       ----                   ----                   ----                   ----
<S>                                                <C>                    <C>                    <C>                    <C>
Net Income                                         $ 8,721,000            $ 8,471,000            $16,372,000            $15,713,000

Shares used to compute 
   earnings per share                               19,280,800             19,227,776             19,275,086             19,225,019

Earnings Per Share - Basic                            $0.45                  $0.44                  $0.85                  $0.82

Shares used to compute
   earnings per share including
   common stock equivalents - Diluted               19,391,618             19,420,911             19,400,044             19,418,154

Earnings Per Share - Diluted                          $0.45                  $0.44                  $0.84                  $0.81
</TABLE>


                                      -15-


<PAGE>
AGREEMENT

Exhibit 4.8


PARTIES:

A. John Ballard(Consultant)


B. ProCoreGroup Inc.
2250 Warrensville Center Road
University Hts. Ohio 44118(Company)


SUBJECT MATTER:

Consult, advise and counsel the company with respect to all financial matters
when requested by company, including but not limited to due diligence
inspections of potential acquisition companies.

TERMS:

1.00
Consultant agrees to provide consulting services as indicated in the
above-referenced subject matter, and other services as requested by Company's
Management.
Consultant agrees to advise and counsel company regarding all financial matters
when requested by company. Consultant agrees to aid in the implementation of
companies SEC or other filings when requested by Company. Consultant agrees to
conduct and/or supervise all due diligence inspections when requested by
company.
2.00
Consultant agrees to direct business opportunities to company whenever possible.

3.00
Company agrees to compensate Consultant with a sum of money equal to Two Hundred
Thousand Shares of free trading company stock plus other compensation as
companies management determines.

4.00
Both Company and Consultant agree to re-negotiate this agreement as Company
achieves more success.


Agreed and accepted:




--------------------------------------------------

an authorized representative for ProCoreGroup INC.


Agreed and accepted:




--------------------------------------------------

John Ballard


<PAGE>
##### 



2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluations;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  April 30, 2008

/s/ Glenn L. PurpleGlenn L. PurpleChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 22 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 22

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relating to marriage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2007

  Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of California (for himself, Mr. Boustany, Mr. 
  Cannon, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. 
Norwood, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Calvert, 
 Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Hunter, Mr. McCotter, Mr. Radanovich, and 
Mr. Bachus) introduced the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relating to marriage.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,
  That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the 
Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents 
and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the 
legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years 
after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1.  Marriage in the United States shall consist only of a 
legal union of one man and one woman.
    ``Section 2.  No court of the United States or of any State shall 
have jurisdiction to determine whether this Constitution or the 
constitution of any State requires that the legal incidents of marriage 
be conferred upon any union other than a legal union between one man 
and one woman.
    ``Section 3.  No State shall be required to give effect to any 
public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State 
concerning a union between persons of the same sex that is treated as a 
marriage, or as having the legal incidents of marriage, under the laws 
of such other State.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Julius Henry, Adm’r, v. Manuel F. Blasco.

(No. 886, Op. Book No. 2, p. 293.)

Error froni Duval County.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

“§'765. *Pleadings in justice’s court are oral, except, etc.; attachment proceedings in justice’s court; petition . not requisite.*This suit was commenced by appellant in „ justice’s court by attachment. In that court the attach- : ment proceedings were quashed, on the ground that • plaintiff had not filed a petition for an attachment, veri- • fied by affidavit. On appeal to the county court by appeliant, and in that court, on motion of appellee, the attachment was quashed upon the same ground, and the appeal dismissed. *Held,*as to proceedings in the justices’ courts, the general rule is that they shall be oral, except 'When otherwise specially provided, but the statute requires that *“a*brief statement thereof shall be noted on the docket.” [R. S. 1573.] There are certain specified .matters which are required to be in writing, and signed , by the party or his attorney and verified by affidavit. [R. S. 1574.] A petition asking for an attachment is not one of the matters included in the exceptions mentioned *421in the last cited article, and there is no law which’requires such a pleading in justice’s court, and the court erred in dissolving the attachment upon the ground stated.

January 19, 1881.

Reversed and remanded.’