alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2410

_____________________________

BONNIE SUE BOTTIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

December 12, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 73 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6131]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               RECOGNITION OF THE ACTING MAJORITY LEADER

  The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The acting majority leader is recognized.

                                Schedule

  Mr. THOMAS. Mr. President, this morning the leader time has been 
reserved and there will be a period for morning business until the hour 
of 11:30, with Senators permitted to speak up to 5 minutes each; at 
11:30 today, the Senate will resume consideration of H.R. 956, the 
product liability bill.
  Under the provisions of the agreement reached last night, there will 
be a series of four consecutive rollcall votes beginning at 12:15 
today. The fourth vote in the series will be on invoking cloture on the 
Gorton substitute amendment; therefore, Senators should be aware that 
second-degree amendments to the Gorton substitute must be filed 1 hour 
prior to that vote; further rollcall votes can be expected throughout 
today's session of the Senate.

                          ____________________
```
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Trans  Energy,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2005,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
William F.  Woodburn , Principal  Accounting  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to Sec.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/   WILLIAM F. WOODBURN
---------------------------------------
William F. Woodburn
Principal Accounting Officer
June 20, 2005

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,649
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,981
<ALLOWANCES>                                       333
<INVENTORY>                                     50,148
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,733
<PP&E>                                          79,424
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 223,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,546
<BONDS>                                         67,764
<COMMON>                                            75
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   223,103
<SALES>                                        265,834
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               265,834
<CGS>                                          216,166
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  216,166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,849
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    37
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,939
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,908
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,908
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.24


</TABLE>
RAMSAY HEALTH CARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                                   (unaudited)


                                  Quarter Ended           Six Months Ended
                                   December 31               December 31
                                 1995         1994          1995          1994
                                 ---------------------------------------------

PRIMARY

Weighted average common shares 
   outstanding ............    7,952,692    7,729,864    7,836,866    7,726,370
Class A convertible preferred 
   stock ..................         --         22,910         --         22,910
Class B convertible preferred 
   stock, Series C ........    1,424,860    1,424,860    1,424,860    1,424,860
Net effect of dilutive stock 
   options-based on the modified 
   treasury stock method ..         --        337,377         --        337,377
                              ----------   ----------    ---------    ---------
TOTAL COMMON AND DILUTIVE
COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES ..    9,377,552    9,515,011    9,261,726    9,511,517
                              ==========   ==========    =========    =========

Net Income Available to Common
Shareholders ..............   $  835,000   $  437,000   $  444,000   $1,025,000
                              ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

NET INCOME PER SHARE ......   $     0.09   $     0.05   $     0.05   $     0.11
                              ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

FULLY DILUTED

Weighted average common shares 
   outstanding ............    8,012,701    7,741,799    8,012,701    7,743,465
Class A convertible 
   preferred stock .. .....         --         22,910         --         22,910
Class B convertible 
   preferred stock, 
   Series C ...............    1,424,860    1,424,860    1,424,860    1,424,860
Net effect of dilutive stock 
   options-based on the modified 
   treasury stock method ..         --        337,377         --        337,377
                              ----------    ---------    ---------    ---------
TOTAL COMMON AND DILUTIVE
COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES ..    9,437,561    9,526,946    9,437,561    9,528,612
                              ==========    =========    =========    =========

Net Income Available to Common
Shareholders ..............   $  835,000   $  437,000   $  444,000   $1,025,000
                              ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

NET INCOME PER SHARE ......   $     0.09   $     0.05   $     0.05   $     0.11
                              ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S7403]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                PROGRAM

  Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, for the information of all Senators, 
there will be a rollcall vote at 9 a.m. on the rescissions conference 
report. Immediately following that vote, the Senate will resume 
consideration of the budget resolution and will begin a series of 
rollcall votes on or in relation to remaining amendments to the budget.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 Top AF analysis performer recognizedPublished Nov. 25, 2015
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs Command Information
                **COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (AFNS) --**
                Kevin Williams, the director of Air Force Studies, Analyses and Assessments, presented the Lt. Gen. Glenn A. Kent Leadership Award to Jacqueline Henningsen during the fall Corona summit at the U.S. Air Force Academy on Nov. 4.The Kent award recognizes influential leaders with substantive analytic responsibilities during their career, and whose vision and leadership have had a significant and lasting effect on the achievements of Air Force analysis. Henningsen is the 12th recipient of this award.“From starting as an analyst at Strategic Air Command in 1985, to program analysis and evaluation in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, to leading the Air Force Studies and Analyses Agency and finally the first director of Studies and Analyses, Assessments and Lessons Learned on the Air Staff, Dr. Henningsen displayed the highest level of care for people and delivered gold-standard results in every challenge,” Williams said. “As a result of her tremendous knowledge, passion and leadership -- repeatable, defendable, and rigorous analysis is now permanently woven into the fabric of the Air Force’s strategic decision-making process.”Lt. Gen. Glenn A. Kent Leadership Award 



Corona summit 



U.S. Air Force Academy 



CSAF 



SecAF 



analysis
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 59 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 59

  Expressing the sense of Congress that Zora Neale Hurston should be 
 recognized for her achievements as a novelist and anthropologist, and 
       for her contributions to the Harlem Renaissance movement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2007

  Mr. Rangel submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress that Zora Neale Hurston should be 
 recognized for her achievements as a novelist and anthropologist, and 
       for her contributions to the Harlem Renaissance movement.

Whereas Zora Neale Hurston is thought to have been born on January 7, 1891;
Whereas Zora Neale Hurston first attended Howard University and later Barnard 
        College of Columbia University, from which she received her bachelor's 
        degree in anthropology in 1928;
Whereas Zora Neale Hurston was a novelist, folklorist, and anthropologist who 
        drew on all of her areas of expertise to write her novels and short 
        stories;
Whereas Zora Neale Hurston was particularly well known for her anthropological 
        research that focused on the African-American community;
Whereas Zora Neale Hurston conducted extensive research on voodoo practices in 
        black communities in Florida and New Orleans, where she had spent parts 
        of her childhood;
Whereas, in 1937, Zora Neale Hurston published her novel, ``Their Eyes Were 
        Watching God,'' often noted as her greatest work;
Whereas Zora Neale Hurston is recognized as one of the most creative writers of 
        the Harlem Renaissance; and
Whereas Zora Neale Hurston died on January 28, 1960, in poverty and obscurity, 
        but today her literary work is celebrated throughout the world, and many 
        of her novels and short stories are considered classics: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That it is the sense of Congress that Zora Neale Hurston should be 
recognized as an accomplished anthropologist, as one of the most 
talented novelists and literary figures of her time, and for her 
contributions to the Harlem Renaissance movement.
                                 <all>
```
Amendment No. 4 to 1997 Stock Option Plan


 Exhibit 4.9 
  

CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. 1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 AMENDMENT No. 4 
  
 INCREASING NUMBER OF SHARES
SUBJECT TO PLAN 
  
 The Company’s Board of Directors and
stockholders have approved and declared the advisability of amending the Company’s 1997 Stock Option Plan to increase the total number of shares subject to the Plan from 2,000,000 to 2,500,000. 
  
 This Amendment No. 4 hereby changes the first sentence of Article V Section
5.1 to read: 
  
 “Subject to adjustment pursuant to the
provisions of Section 5.2 hereof, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued and sold hereunder shall be 2,500,000.”
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 179 (Thursday, September 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56551-56552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23153]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK DEM Fellowships.
    Date: October 13-14, 2010.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Radisson National Airport, 2020 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, VA 22202.
    Contact Person: Michael W. Edwards, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 
Room 750, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 
594-8886, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a6f6e7d6b786e79674a6f727e786b2464636e6e6124646362246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="72171605130016011f32170a0600135c1c1b1616195c1c1b1a5c151d04">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 56552]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 10, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-23153 Filed 9-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 86-2070.

#### Kamen *v.*Nordberg, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Kemper Financial Services, Inc., et al., Real Parties in Interest).

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice White,

dissenting.

The issue here is when mandamus relief will be available to a party who claims that the District Court wrongly deprived him of the right to a jury trial. Petitioner is a shareholder in a mutual fund and brought a derivative suit against the two companies that administer the fund, alleging breach of fiduciary duty under § 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U. S. C. § 80a-35(b). The District Court granted defendants’ motion to strike petitioner’s demand for a jury trial on this claim, and petitioner sought mandamus from the Court of Appeals to compel the District Court to honor his demand for a jury trial. The Seventh Circuit denied relief in an order (No. 87-1455, Apr. 13, 1987), citing its prior decision in *First National Bank of Waukesha*v. *Warren,*796 F. 2d 999 (1986).

In Warren, the Seventh Circuit held that mandamus will lie to enforce a party’s demand for a jury trial only when, first, the party’s right to a jury trial is clear and indisputable and, second, the party has no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires. *Id.,*at 1006. The second point is especially critical because it will prevent interlocutory review of many requests for a writ of mandamus to direct the granting of a jury trial, as in many cases the petitioning party can seek this same relief on appeal from the ultimate resolution of the case in the trial court. This decision conflicts with the decisions of other Courts of Appeals, which hold that mandamus relief is available to review an order denying a claimed right of trial by jury, and that a proper petition *940for mandamus in these circumstances obliges the Court of Appeals to address the merits of the claimed right to a jury trial. *In re Union Nacional de Trabajadores,*502 F. 2d 113, 115-116 (CA1 1974), vacated on other grounds, 527 F. 2d 602 (1975); *Lee Pharmaceuticals*v. *Mishler,*526 F. 2d 1115, 1116-1117 (CA2 1975) *(per curiam); Eldredge*v. *Gourley,*505 F. 2d 769, 770 (CA3 1974); *General Tire & Rubber Co.*v. *Watkins,*331 F. 2d 192, 194 (CA4), cert. denied, 377 U. S. 952 (1964); *Black*v. *Boyd,*248 F. 2d 156, 159-161 (CA6 1957); *In re Vorpahl,*695 F. 2d 318, 319 (CA8 1982); *Owens-Illinois, Inc.*v. *United States District Court,*698 F. 2d 967, 969 (CA9 1983); *In re Zweibon,*184 U. S. App. D. C. 167, 170-171, 565 F. 2d 742, 745-746 (1977) *(per curiam).*It may also be inconsistent with this Court’s prior decisions in *Beacon Theatres, Inc.*v. *Westover,*359 U. S. 500 (1959), and *Dairy Queen, Inc.*v. *Wood,*369 U. S. 469 (1962), which emphasize the responsibility of the Courts of Appeals to grant mandamus relief where it is necessary to protect the constitutional right to trial by jury. I would grant certiorari to resolve the split among the Circuits on this issue.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 93 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 93

 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
                   Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2008

  Mr. Crowley (for himself, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Berman, Ms. Ros-
Lehtinen, Ms. Watson, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Holt, and Mr. Pitts) introduced 
the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
                   Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress approves the 
renewal of the import restrictions contained in section 3(a)(1) of the 
Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.
                                 <all>
```
583 A.2d 323

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAVID L. MENDEZ.

February 14, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Wheelchairs clash in the first basketball matches at Warrior GamesPublished Sept. 30, 2014
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Devon Suits
                        
                        
                        Air Force News Service
                **COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (AFNS) --**
                The first round of wheelchair basketball brought some fierce competition between the services during the 2014 Warrior Games at the United States Olympic Training Center in Colorado Springs, Colorado, Sept. 29.
The Navy and Air Force teams met on the hardwood for the first game of the evening. The Navy proved to be too much for the Air Force on both sides of the court. The Air Force tried to keep it close, but in the end, Navy took the victory 38-19.
“Once we saw what we had in terms of speed ... we pressed to get (the ball) down the floor,” said Grant Moorhead, the coach for the Navy wheelchair basketball team. “I think we did really well. I am proud of them all.”
Winning the first game means the Navy’s next opponent will be the Army on Sept. 30.
Moorhead, who has been coaching for the past 5 years, said he enjoys the Warrior Game experience.
“I love working with the guys and seeing them develop over the whole season,” he said.
The second game of the evening was a one-sided battle between the Marines and Special Operations Command. At the end of the first half, the Marines led 24-1. The size and speed of the Marines proved to be too much and they kept up the pressure on SOCOM, winning the game 36-9.
The Air Force and SOCOM moved to the loser bracket of the competition and will play their second game on Sept. 30.
According to Willie Jackson, the coach of the Air Force wheelchair basketball team, his team didn’t play well against the Navy.
“It was the first game and (the team) kind of had the jitters,” Jackson said. “I have a bunch of new guys that haven’t been on the stage, and I think that was our problem. I don’t think they were ready for this big of a stage.”
For the next match against SOCOM, he said that he is looking for improved defensive play to help push them to the next round. The round-robin competition will continue until the gold medal game scheduled for Oct 3.Colorado Springs 



Colorado 



athletics 



sports 



warrior care 



recovery 



wingmen 



paralympic 



basketball 



DMA 



Warrior Games