alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                         ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT


    THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is effective as
of April 17, 1997 (the "Effective Date"), by and between SUPERGEN, INC., a
California corporation ("Assignor") and R & S, LLC, a California limited
liability company ("Assignee").

                                       RECITALS

    A.   Assignor and Ellwin E. Ashwill, trustee of the Ashwill Trust,
established 11/8/89 ("Seller"), entered into that certain Standard Offer,
Agreement and Escrow Instructions for Purchase of Real Estate dated, for
reference purposes only, as of December 11, 1996, and all of the exhibits and
addenda attached thereto (collectively, the "Agreement"), whereby Assignor
agreed to purchase from Seller and Seller agreed to sell to Assignor all of
Seller's right, title and interest in and to that certain condominium property
commonly known as 1059 Serpentine Lane, Unit B, Pleasanton, Alameda County,
California, as more particularly described in the Agreement.

    B.   Pursuant to Paragraph H of Addendum A to the Agreement, Assignor
desires to assign to Assignee, and Assignee desires to assume, all of Assignor's
rights and obligations under the Agreement.

    NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the Premises, the Agreement and
the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, Assignor and Assignee
agree as follows:

    1.   ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT.  As of the Effective Date, Assignor hereby
conveys and assigns to Assignee all of Assignor's right, title and interest in
and to the Agreement.

    2.   ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT.  Assignee accepts the foregoing assignment
and agrees to assume, pay and perform all of the terms and obligations of 
Assignor under the Agreement.

    3.   INDEMNIFICATION.  As of the Effective Date, Assignee shall indemnify,
defend, protect and hold Assignor harmless of and from any and all claims,
demands, causes of action or liabilities arising out of or resulting in any way
from the Agreement.


<PAGE>

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee have executed this Agreement to
be effective as of the Effective Date.

ASSIGNOR:                                   ASSIGNEE:
SuperGen , Inc., a California               R & S, LLC, a California limited
corporation                                 liability company

By: /s/ Dr. Joseph Rubinfeld                By: /s/ Dr. Joseph Rubinfeld
   ---------------------------                  ----------------------------
Name:  Dr. Joseph Rubinfeld                 Name:  Dr. Joseph Rubinfeld
     ------------------------                    ---------------------------
Title:    President                         Title:
      -----------------------                     --------------------------
AGREEMENT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE


Between
     Michael Jackson ("Michael") of the first part

And

     Netco Investments Inc. ("NetCo") of the second part


Whereas
     Michael if the registered owner of the URL www.vitabeast.com
                                                -----------------

     Netco wishes to acquire the said URL

Now therefore for valuable consideration given and received and by their mutual
covenants, the parties agree as follows;

     1    Michael does hereby irrevocably sell all right , title and interest in
          and to the URL www.vitabeast.com to Netco.
                         -----------------

     2    The purchase price shall be the sum of $1.00 payable on signing
          hereof.

     3    Michael hereby transfers the administrative rights to Netco in order
          for Netco to deal with the domain registrar, Dotster.com.



Signed on this 1st day of  June, 2003




_______________________                _________________________



<PAGE>
News United States Air Force
 Communication Airmen hardwire Baltops missionPublished June 11, 2015
                        
                        By Senior Airman Michael Battles
                        
                        
                        39th Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **POWIDZ, Poland  (AFNS) --**
                In support of Baltic Operations 2015 June 5-20, a team of Airmen from the 1st Combat Communications Squadron deployed to Powidz Air Base, and were charged with the responsibility of maintaining all communication requirements for the Air Force at the installation. 
Baltops is a multinational maritime exercise in Poland, Sweden, Germany and throughout the Baltic Sea, including participation from 14 NATO and three partner nations. Baltops is designed to enhance flexibility and interoperability, as well as demonstrate the resolve of allied and partner forces to defend the Baltic region.
The three-person team; Staff Sgt. Dean Gage, the 1st CBCS cyber systems supervisor, Senior Airman Ian Philips, a 1st CBCS tactical network operations technician and Senior Airman Brendan Kennedy, a1st CBCS satellite communications technician, are the sole points of contact for Baltops communications.
According to Kennedy, upon arrival at a deployment location, the three Airmen worked around-the-clock to ensure communications were setup within 24 hours, so all requirements for operations were met and running efficiently before the deployment teams arrived.
"You need communications or nothing will get done," Kennedy said. "We arrive early so that once boots hit the ground, they are good to go. If we didn't, everything would go to a standstill."
During rotational deployments such as Baltops, each Airman on the communications team is selected due to their specific skills sets.
"Each one of us comes from a different communications background," Gage said. "We handle completely different communication aspects here at Baltops, but those differences are what make us a well-rounded team."
A large portion of the communication specialists' setup requires the team to establish a link with their home station at Ramstein Air Base, Germany. Additionally, the team enables all network capabilities, programs, computers, phones and radio connections.
Along with setting up the initial communications, the team is responsible for resolving any communications issues the 100th, 916th and 507th Air Refueling Wings may have during their 15-day deployment.
"Without us, the missions will go on," Gage said. "But the deployers will have overall limited capabilities. We set up everything from phones to laptops, Wi-Fi and email."Poland 



communications 



USAFE 



Baltops 



Powidz Related Links
        AF takes to the skies for Baltops 2015
                                June 10, 2015
                                The Air Force, along with its Polish counterparts, officially kicked off Powidz Air Base's portion of Baltic Operations 2015 with the first KC-135 Stratotanker flight from the 507th Air Refueling Wing here June 8.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RENAL CARE GROUP, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          23,035
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,230
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,961
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               193,678
<PP&E>                                         130,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 535,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,681
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           462
<OTHER-SE>                                     352,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   535,332
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               303,809
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  194,854
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,468
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,253
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,372
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,575
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,797
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,797
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56


</TABLE>
#### Carhart & Bro. v. J. M. Killough & Lewis Moore.

(No. 1206, Op. Book No. 3, p. 467.)

Appeal from McLennan County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 112. *Limited partnership; extent of parties’ liability in.*It is well settled that a creditor who deals with a partnership after he has express notice of an arrangement between the partners by which the liability of one or more of them is limited or qualified, is bound by such arrangement. [Story on Part. § 130; Baxter v. Clark, 4 Iredell (Law), 127.]

§ 113. *Same; object, etc., of our statute; substantial compliance with.*The primary object of our statute with reference to limited partnerships was to furnish parties a means of giving constructive notice of the arrangement between the partners restricting the liability of some of *46them. And in the formation of such limited partnership, if the parties sustantially comply with the terms of the law in executing and acknowledging or proving the certificate, and causing the same to be recorded, and in making and filing the required affidavit and giving notice thereof, in such manner that third parties cannot be misled to their injury, then the full object and purpose of the law has been attained, and mere formal defects in these particulars will not render the limited partner bound for the partnership debts as a general partner. [Pas. Dig. art. 4724; R. S. art. 3442 *et seq.;*Monroe v. Arlege, 23 Tex. 478; Lachomette v. Thomas, 5 Robinson (La.), 172; Parsons on Partnership, 538.]

January 22, 1881.

Affirmed.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

‘” I balre raoentl*ke~s& 

Rationing Board 

a member or t&l 

Honorable Mohsrd 7. Stovall. 

Diatrfot Attorney 

Ylopaaaa, Toxae 

Doas Dirt oplalon Ho. o-53 

Rar U&the 

t Attorney of 

d a8 a momber of 

en6 lnfornmtfon as to 

of a member of the 

board8 and war oompriarions are 

t GOT the auratic)n of the war 88 

to the elrlllan population as 

088, and tho members aot purely 

s. In many lnstanoes they aro 

rust and eunolwnanta and tbo dutior 

mb rr~panrtbllitl~a required a)?8 suoh that Our COOatitwdOn pr0vsate State orrloere from aooeptlng same* 
602 

,,a. Riohard T. Stovall Fags 2. 

Unquestfmibly the lsw should bo llbsral.lp oon- 

&rued and tharabp permit thosa xho hold off iclsl poaltions 

to reader suoh aid and asrlatonoo to the jiovernmoot a8 is 

~onallrtent wolth and whioh do not violets the hIL9titUtiOA 

ma lawa of the hod. 

We feel ooniidont after you havo asaertalaed the 

dutlea end rssponeibilitlra that will be rsqulrad of you aa a 

mmbsr of the =prioe panel of the County Rationing Board” you 

04~ drtsrsinr for yowceolf whether came doe6 in any weg eontllot with the Cohstltutlon. 

Until and ualees we hare more deiinlts informatlOA relative to suoh position and work to be performed thareond@r we oould Dot &iv6 aAy drtlnits reply. 

Youlw very mllf, 

ATl’GRW G??N???AL 37 ‘RX49 

A? -3- 

9Y Gso. 9, Barous 

A68b.3 tant 

WNNIRCE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,789
<SECURITIES>                                     8,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,831
<ALLOWANCES>                                       549
<INVENTORY>                                      6,592
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,452
<PP&E>                                          21,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,705
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,344
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,844
<SALES>                                         10,565
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,565
<CGS>                                            7,013
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,013
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,545
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   549
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,149
<INCOME-TAX>                                       437
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                712
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       712
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE BEKA SOLOMON

______________________

2012

- 1689

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 11/358,951.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

R OGER L. B ROWDY , Browdy and Neimark , P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With him on the
brief was R ONNI S. J ILLIONS

.

K RISTI L. R. S AWERT

, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia

, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were N ATHAN K. K ELLEY , Deputy Solicitor, and A MY J. N ELSON

, Associ ate Solicitor

. Of counsel was F RANCES L YNCH

, Associate Solicitor.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, M OORE

, and O’M ALLEY

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

August 13, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. RM06-16-010; RM06-16-011]

On August 19, 2010 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission announced that a Technical Conference on Frequency Response in the Wholesale Electric Grid would be held on Thursday, September 23, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. This staff-led conference will be held in the Commission Meeting Room at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. The conference will be open for the public to attend and advance registration is not required. Members of the Commission may attend the conference.

                    Attached is an agenda for this meeting. A full agenda, with panelists, will be posted on the Commission's Web calendar page for this event prior to the meeting. The Commission's Web site is at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*

                    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please send an e-mail to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free 1-866-208-3372 (voice) or 202-208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202-208-2106 with the required accommodations.                

                    For more information about this conference, please contact: Sarah McKinley, Office of External Affairs, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-8368,                     *sarah.mckinley@ferc.gov*.                

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-23600 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION  The undersigned hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006 of PHL Variable Insurance Company (the Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Philip K. Polkinghorn
/s/ Michael E. HaylonName:Philip K.
Polkinghorn
Name:Michael
E. HaylonTitle:Chief
Executive Officer
Title:Executive
Vice President andChief
Financial OfficerDate:April 2,
2007
Date:April 2,
2007  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to PHL Variable Insurance Company and will be retained by PHL Variable Insurance Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Key Spouse Mentors gather virtually to share ideas, best practices

              - Published  June 1, 2021
              -                             By Jaimi Chafin                                                    
              - Headquarters Air Force Reserve Command

**ROBINS AIR FORCE BASE, Ga. (AFNS) --  **
Air Force Reserve Key Spouse Mentors from around the country came together virtually May 7, to share their ideas, struggles and best practices. The Key Spouse Mentors conference also provided guidance and education on a host of Reserve programs available, resiliency and wellness techniques.Headquarters **Air Force Reserve Command** personnel were on hand to provide training on family resilience programs, while several wings provided training on their best practices.“As we visited different wings, I heard so many incredible speakers and stories, and knew we would benefit from connecting and sharing what we’d learned and experienced through our time in our respective locations,” said Janis Scobee, AFRC Key Spouse mentor and spouse of **Lt. Gen. Richard Scobee**, AFRC commander and chief of the Air Force Reserve. “We really wanted to highlight and showcase all of the unique talent we have.”“What we need right now, more than ever, is our spouse networks,” said Edith White, AFRC Key Spouse Mentor and spouse of Chief Master Sgt. Timothy White, AFRC’s command chief master sergeant and Scobee’s senior enlisted advisor. “We have all had some very challenging times due to COVID-19 impacting our families and the families we support. Our resiliency has been challenged on so many levels.”Virtual conferences like this one help bridge the distance so Key Spouses can share their ideas and best practices and support one another.Supporting the families of a unit, squadron or wing can be a big job, but Mrs. Scobee said it’s more important than ever.“Our Key Spouses work with the leadership to make sure the families are being taken care of regardless of if the member is on home station, TDY or deployed,” she said. “They work so hard to take care of everyone in addition to their own families, so it’s important for us to come together to support and take care of each other.”She went on to say that Key Spouses are critical to mission success and individual readiness. If families aren’t being cared for, the service member can’t focus on the mission.Mrs. White added that Key Spouses are the unwavering foundation of resiliency and support for Airmen and their families.The Key Spouse Program is an official Air Force Unit Family Readiness Program designed to enhance readiness, personal/family resiliency and establish a sense of Air Force community. Key Spouses are commander-appointed and serve as a vital resource to command teams in an effort to support Air Force families. The strategic vision is to increase resiliency and unit cohesion amongst military members and their families throughout the military life cycle.

LRUSAFAFAir ForceAFRCAir Force Reserve CommandKey Spouse ProgramresilienceKey Spouse Mentors conferenceAir Force Unit Family Readiness Program
Exhibit 4.1


 


 



 












October 31, 2014







U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission


Office of the Chief Accountant


100F Street Northeast


Washington, DC 20549-2000








	
RE:

	
Tyin Group Holdings Limited (fmly Guwenhua International Company)


File No. 000-54275










Dear Sir or Madam:







We have read Item 4.01 of the Form 8-K dated October 31, 2014 of Tyin Group Holdings Limited (formerly Guwenhua International Company) and are in agreement with the statements contained therein as it pertains to our firm.







We have no basis to agree or disagree with any other statements of the Registrant contained in Item 4.01.


Sincerely,







/s/ Anton & Chia, LLP