alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.01

                      HARTFORD LIFE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

         COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND EARNINGS
             TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                          (In millions)                               2003      2002      2001      2000      1999
-----------------------------------------------------------------    ------    ------    ------    ------    ------
<S>                                                                  <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
    EARNINGS                                                         $  949    $  567    $  765    $  788    $  686

ADD:

FIXED CHARGES
    Interest expense                                                    117       112       104        66        67

    Interest factor attributable to rentals                              11        10        11        12        11
                                                                     ------    ------    ------    ------    ------
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                                     128       122       115        78        78
    Interest credited to contractholders                              1,120     1,288     1,260     1,124     1,197
                                                                     ------    ------    ------    ------    ------
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES INCLUDING INTEREST CREDITED TO
CONTRACTHOLDERS                                                       1,248     1,410     1,375     1,202     1,275
                                                                     ------    ------    ------    ------    ------
EARNINGS, AS DEFINED                                                  1,077       689       880       866       764
                                                                     ------    ------    ------    ------    ------
EARNINGS, AS DEFINED, INCLUDING INTEREST CREDITED TO
CONTRACTHOLDERS                                                       2,197     1,977     2,140     1,990     1,961
                                                                     ------    ------    ------    ------    ------
RATIOS

    Earnings, as defined, to total fixed charges                        8.4       5.6       7.7      11.1       9.8
                                                                     ------    ------    ------    ------    ------
    Earnings, as defined, including interest credited to
       contractholders, to total fixed charges including interest
       credited to contractholders                                      1.7       1.4       1.6       1.7       1.5
                                                                     ------    ------    ------    ------    ------
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 18-1693

_______________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. 

J. WILLIAM BOOKWALTER, III, M.D.;

ROBERT J. SCLABASSI, M.D.; ANNA MITINA

v.

UPMC; UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS, 

d/b/a UPP DEPARTMENT OF NEUROSURGERY

J. WILLIAM BOOKWALTER, III, M.D.;

ROBERT J. SCLABASSI, M.D.; ANNA MITINA,

Appellants

_______________

(W.D. Pa. No. 2:12-cv-00145)

_______________

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING

_______________

Present: SMITH, Chief Judge, and McKEE, AMBRO, CHAGARES, JORDAN,

HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, 

BIBAS, MATEY, PHIPPS, and FUENTES,* Circuit Judges

The petition for rehearing filed by Appellees in the above-captioned case having been 

submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other 

available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, it is hereby ORDERED that 

the petition for rehearing is GRANTED IN PART. A majority of the judges who participated in the decision of the Court having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing by 

 

* Judge FUENTES’s vote is limited to panel rehearing only.
the panel is GRANTED. The opinion and judgment filed September 17, 2019, are hereby 

VACATED. A subsequent opinion and judgment are herewith issued. 

The majority has made changes to the language that appeared at pages 3–4, 6, 11, 15, 

27–30, 32–33, 35–37, and 39–40 of the original opinion. Most of the material that appeared 

at pages 18–25 of the original opinion has been deleted. Judge AMBRO’s opinion concurring in the judgment has been withdrawn.

A majority of the judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, 

the petition for rehearing by the Court en banc is DENIED.

By the Court,

s/ Stephanos Bibas

Circuit Judge

Dated: December 20, 2019

NMR/cc: Patrick K. Cavanaugh, Esq.

Stephen J. Del Sole, Esq.

Gregory M. Simpson, Esq.

Andrew M. Stone, Esq.

Kirti Datla, Esq.

Jessica L. Ellsworth, Esq.

Sarah C. Marberg, Esq.
News United States Air Force
 Air Force Special Tactics chaplain named best among CGOsPublished June 17, 2014
                        
                        By 1st Lt. Jerred Moon
                        
                        
                        24th Special Operations Wing Public Affairs
                **HURLBURT FIELD, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Special Tactics Chaplain (Capt.) Chad Montgomery was named the Air Force's top company grade chaplain in a recent announcement by Maj. Gen. Howard Stendahl, the Air Force Chief of Chaplains. The Edwin R. Chess Award honors the late retired Maj. Gen. Edwin R. Chess, the fourth Air Force Chief of Chaplains. The winner is selected based on leadership and job performance, significant self-improvement, and base and community involvement. Montgomery received the 2014 Edwin R. Chess Award for his outstanding accomplishments with the 724th Special Tactics Group at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. While deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, Montgomery provided 37 joint task force members with spiritual guidance, which enabled the International Security Assistance Force to conduct operations. "I'm very appreciative and humbled to be utilized by God, and I'm thankful to have been mentored by others with regard to ministerial excellence and growth in grace and truth," Montgomery said. Montgomery helped more than 220 Airmen reintegrate following their deployments, helping them focus on being resilient. "My parents were, and continue to be, phenomenal influences in my life. My wife has been my devoted partner in ministry and best friend who embraces these opportunities for our family to share life with others and nurture them," Montgomery said. "My extended family and the (Air Force Special Operations Command) Chaplain Corps have been very supportive." Montgomery exemplified Air Force chaplains in the fight. He showed up in austere locations to counsel, lead worship or just to be a friend in a far-away place for special tactics Airmen. Chaplain (Maj.) Jason Botts, the 24th Special Operations Wing Chaplain, said Montgomery is the real deal. "I'm excited for Chad. He embodies the very best personal and professional qualities of our Chaplain Corps," Botts said. "On a broader scale, I'm thrilled by the award because it provides confirmation that the significant investment by our Air Force leadership to embed chaplains within the Air Force's most decorated combat unit is providing compelling return on investment." Montgomery also shared a quote from Andrew Murray, which has helped him through the years: "Humility is perfect quietness of heart. It is to expect nothing, to wonder at nothing that is done to me, to feel nothing done against me. It is to be at rest when nobody praises me, and when I am blamed or despised. It is to have a blessed home in the Lord, where I can go in and shut the door, and kneel to my Father in secret, and am at peace as in a deep sea of calmness, when all around and above is trouble."Company Grade Chaplain 



officer 



deployment 



Special Tactics 



 



chaplain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic 

and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of 

any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go 

to press. 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 19-BG-59

IN RE RONALD B. BERGMAN

2018 DDN 363

A Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 356477

BEFORE: Beckwith and McLeese, Associate Judges, and Nebeker, Senior Judge. 

O R D E R

(FILED – April 11, 2019)

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland 

disbarring respondent by consent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction; this 

court’s February 15, 2019, order suspending respondent pending resolution of this 

matter and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be 

imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent 

failed to file either a response to this court’s show cause order or his D.C. Bar R. XI, 

§ 14(g) affidavit, it is 

ORDERED that Ronald B. Bergman is hereby disbarred from the practice of 

law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010); In re 

Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical 

reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not 

participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of 

respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C. Bar

R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E923]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                     TRIBUTE TO RABBI ISAIAH ZELDIN

                                 ______

                         HON. HOWARD L. BERMAN

                             of california

                          HON. HENRY A. WAXMAN

                             of california

                       HON. ANTHONY C. BEILENSON

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                          Tuesday, May 2, 1995
  Mr. BERMAN. Mr. Speaker, we are honored to pay tribute to Rabbi 
Isaiah Zeldin, a good friend and one of the most respected and 
influential leaders in the Jewish community of Los Angeles, on the 
occasion of his 50th year in the rabbinate and his 75th birthday. In 
1964 Rabbi Zeldin founded Stephen S. Wise Temple, which has since 
become the largest Jewish congregation in the West and the second-
largest in the world. This alone justifies his exalted status.
  But Rabbi Zeldin is not one to rest on his laurels. Through its 
programs, lectures and full-time day and high school, Stephen S. Wise 
Temple has made an immeasurable contribution to Jewish life in southern 
California. Hardly a day goes by when there is not a stimulating event 
of some kind taking place at the temple. Rabbi Zeldin would not have it 
any other way.
  In 1953, New York's loss became California's gain; Rabbi Zeldin left 
his native New York City, where he was assistant dean of Hebrew Union 
College, and headed west; 1 year later he became founding dean of the 
Los Angeles branch Hebrew Union College. From 1958-63 Rabbi Zeldin was 
spiritual leader of Temple Emanuel in Beverly Hills.
  Despite his rabbinical duties, Rabbi Zeldin somehow finds the time to 
get actively involved with other cases and organizations. For example, 
he is past president of the American Zionist Council and the San 
Fernando Valley Synagogue Council and sits on the board of the UCLA 
Medical Ethics Committee. In addition, Rabbi Zeldin writes frequently 
for newspapers and magazines.
  Mr. Speaker, we ask our colleagues to join us today in saluting Rabbi 
Isaiah Zeldin, a man whose friendship, guidance, and intellect has 
touched the lives of so many. We wish him well on his birthday.

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5630]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1240
               A MODIFIED FLAT TAX PROPOSAL CALLED McFLAT

  (Mr. SOUDER asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. SOUDER. Mr. Speaker, I favor tax cuts for the American families. 
I believe American families can do more for themselves than the 
Government.
  Mr. Speaker, the American people devote 5.4 billion hours and $232 
billion every year to comply with the United States Tax Code. 
Furthermore, billions of dollars are then spent by the IRS to 
administer and enforce these tax laws. To reform this unwieldy system, 
our majority leader, Congressman Dick Armey has put forward a flat tax 
proposal that can simplify our system and provide a new contract with 
the American people.
  We have all heard the phrase ``you deserve a break today'' and now I 
want to help put those words into action. Today I will be introducing a 
modified flat tax proposal called McFlat. the ``m'' stands for mortgage 
and the ``c'' stands for charitable. McFlat incorporates the meat of 
Congressman Armey's flat tax along with deductions for mortgage 
interest and charitable contributions.
  McFlat can provide the arches, so to speak, between those that want a 
simpler and fairer system and those of us who feel that it is essential 
to retain deductions for homes, churches, and charities. McFlat is the 
simple and fair way to revolutionize the American Tax Code.

                          ____________________
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

                    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application.                          ( print page 5843)    

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2010-0019.                

*Date Filed:*                     January 20, 2010.                

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*                     Mail Vote 618, TC3 Special Passenger Amending Resolution 010L,  between Japan and Korea (Rep. of),  (Memo 1353),  Intended effective date: 15 February 2010/1 April 2010.                

Barbara J. Hairston,

Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Alternate Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2010-2397 Filed 2-3-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

DARRYL L. COOK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2014-5049

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:13-cv-00870-PEC, Chief Judge Patricia E. 

Campbell-Smith.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

This court dismissed the above-captioned appeal on 

July 1, 2014, for failure to pay the docketing fee in accordance with this court’s rules. Darryl L. Cook moves to 

reopen this appeal so that he can move to proceed in 

forma pauperis. 

Upon consideration thereof,

Case: 14-5049 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 07/29/2014
2 COOK v. US

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) If Mr. Cook submits Form 6, Form 6A, and his 

informal brief within 30 days of the date of this order, the 

mandate will be recalled, this court’s July 1, 2014, dismissal order will be vacated, and this appeal will be reopened. 

(2) The clerk’s office is directed to send Form 6, Form 

6A, and the Guide for Pro Se Petitioners and Appellants 

to Mr. Cook.

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk of Court

s30

Case: 14-5049 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 07/29/2014
SMH Varitek Note Extension and Amendment



  
 Exhibit 10.38

  
 EXTENSION AND AMENDMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 WITNESSETH: 
  
 WHEREAS, the secured promissory note of Varitek Industries, Inc. (n/k/a
Remote Knowledge, Inc.) payable to SMH Varitek, LLC dated November 27, 2002 (the “Promissory Note”) and the related Security Agreement, Guaranty, Stock Pledge Agreement and Stockholders’ Agreement dated even date therewith require the
repayment of the principal of said note to the holder, SMH Varitek, LLC on or about November 27, 2003 (“Maturity Date”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Promissory Note is convertible under certain circumstances in accordance with this terms on or before the Maturity Date; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the events that would result in a conversion of the principal of the
Promissory Note have not yet closed but are expected to close within a reasonably short period of time subsequent to the Maturity Date and the parties hereto would prefer to permit the conversion of the principal amount of the Promissory Note.

  
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  
 1. Extension of the Maturity Date. The Maturity Date of the above referenced Promissory Note shall be extended until January 27, 2004 or to such
other subsequent date that may be agreed to by all of the parties in writing. 
  
 2. Universal Amendment. This new definition of the Maturity Date shall apply to all of the constituent documents regarding the Promissory Note and no default shall result under the Promissory Note or any of the
other constituent documents so long as payment or conversion of the Promissory Note is made in accordance with the terms of the Note as amended hereby. 
  
 3. All Other Terms. All other terms of the Promissory Note and the constituent documents shall remain as is except as amended by necessity to
comport with the revised definition of the Maturity Date set forth herein. 
  
 Dated this 29th day of November 2003. 
  

	 SMH VARITEK LLC, a Delaware
 limited liability company

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Richard C. Webb


	 	 	 
	 Richard C. Webb, Manager


	 Print Name and Authority



  

 1 









	 Remote Knowledge, Inc., a
 Delaware corporation

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Randy S. Bayne


	 	 	     Randy S. Bayne, President and
         Chief Executive Officer
         (f/ka Varitek Industries, Inc.)



  

 2
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

KAD/Research 07-71110

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BUDHY WALUYO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-71110

Agency No. A095-634-674

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2009** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Budhy Waluyo, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal,

FILED

NOV 30 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
KAD/Research 2 07-71110

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence,

Husyev v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition. 

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination

because Waluyo’s initial declaration omitted the threats, attack, and injury that led

to his flight from Indonesia, see Alvarez-Santos v. INS, 332 F.3d 1245, 1254 (9th

Cir. 2003) (petitioner’s omission of a “dramatic pivotal event” from his asylum

application supported adverse credibility determination), and because Waluyo

testified inconsistently about his injury during this incident, see Li v. Ashcroft, 378

F.3d 959, 964 (9th Cir. 2004). In the absence of credible testimony, Waluyo’s

asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d

1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Because Waluyo’s CAT claim is based on the testimony the IJ found not

credible, and Waluyo points to no other evidence to show it is more likely than not

he would be tortured if returned to Indonesia, his CAT claim fails. See id. at 1156-

57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
582 A.2d 1004

#### IN THE MATTER OF JOHN J. SCOTTO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

December 18, 1990.

ORDER

JOHN J. SCOTTO formerly of BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, having entered a plea of *nolo contendere*to a charge of possession of a forged instrument, in violation of California Penal Code Section 475; and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to *R.*1:20-6(b)(1), JOHN J. SCOTTO is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, *529effective immediately and until the further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that JOHN J. SCOTTO be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that JOHN J. SCOTTO comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 81 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4967]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

       THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE READY FOR REAL ACTION ON THE DEBT

  (Mr. GUTKNECHT asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. GUTKNECHT. Mr. Speaker, during the district work period and 
subsequently, many of us have had town meetings and conversations with 
the good people we were elected to serve. One message that has come 
through loud and clear is that the American people want Congress to 
work together to solve the great problems facing this great Nation. 
They know that the Medicare trust fund is going bankrupt. They 
understand that the burgeoning debt will destroy our children's 
economic future.
  As Churchill reminded us, the American people did not cross the 
oceans, ford the streams, traverse the mountains, and deal with the 
droughts and pestilence because they are made of sugar candy. The 
American people are tough. They are ready for real solutions, but they 
will not accept simply lining up every day and yapping like a bunch of 
toy poodles while the debt balloons and Medicare goes bankrupt. The 
American people want real action. The American people are ready.

                          ____________________
```