alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 MTIs and cadet cadre form partnershipPublished Aug. 2, 2016
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Veronica Ward
                        
                        
                        U.S. Air Force Academy Public Affairs
                **U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY, Colo. (AFNS) --**
                A group of military training instructors from Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas, joined cadet cadre in Jacks Valley toward the end of July as part of an Air Education and Training Command and U.S. Air Force Academy training partnership.According to Lt. Col. Adam Larson, the 322nd Training Squadron commander, the goal of the partnership is to make basic cadet training as successful as possible.“We provide intense, challenging and respectful training to produce great Airmen,” Larson said. “We hold people accountable without degrading or demeaning them.”Earlier this year, 30 cadets embedded with MTIs for basic military training at Lackland to learn how to motivate and develop new members of the military. In May, MTIs visited the Academy to talk to cadre and develop their leadership skills.“We’re here this week to follow up, offer tools to motivate the cadet trainees and get feedback,” said Tech. Sgt. Giselle Janousek, an MTI. “We teach the importance of holding each other accountable and empowering trainees with some kind of task that they are responsible for.”Although the concepts are simple, MTIs are able to offer big-picture concepts to the cadre.“We help the cadre see the light at the end of the tunnel regarding where (unaddressed) attitudes and issues can lead,” said Master Sgt. James Correll, an MTI.The instructors have carried over lessons learned from changes made to BMT over the last four years that are now strengthening cadre leadership and BCT at the Academy.“Our goal for BCT courses was to motivate the cadet trainees to take ownership of their experience and feel a tangible sense of accomplishment every time they complete a course,” said Cadet 1st Class Haji Dunn, the BCT Jacks Valley courses commander. “The timely feedback the MTIs gave us allowed us to better meet this goal. They truly respected the work we put in and the way we executed.”MTI 



U.S. Air Force Academy 



cadets 



Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 71 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6006]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              INTRODUCTION OF BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

  The following bills and joint resolutions were introduced, read the 
first and second time by unanimous consent, and referred as indicated:

           By Mr. DASCHLE:
       S. 742. A bill to amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to 
     limit acquisition of land on the 39-mile segment of the 
     Missouri River, Nebraska and South Dakota, designated as a 
     recreational river, to acquisition from willing sellers, and 
     for other purposes; to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
     Resources.
           By Mrs. HUTCHISON:
       S. 743. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
     to provide a tax credit for investment necessary to 
     revitalize communities within the United States, and for 
     other purposes; to the Committee on Finance.
           By Mr. CRAIG:
       S. 744. A bill to authorize minors who are under the child 
     labor provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and 
     who are under 18 years of age to load materials into balers 
     and compactors that meet appropriate American National 
     Standards Institute design safety standards; to the Committee 
     on Labor and Human Resources.
     

                          ____________________
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Written StatementPursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

The undersigned,Steven L. Muellner, the Chief Executive Officer of Meade Instruments Corp. (the“Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, hereby certifies that:

           (i)  the Form 10-K for the fiscal yearended February 28, 2007 of the Company (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

         (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

Date: June1, 2007
| By:                 | /s/ STEVEN L.  MUELLNER |   |
|---------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| *President and CEO* |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
IBSG International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Geoffrey Birch, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: April 13, 2005

/s/ Geoffrey Birch Geoffrey Birch, Chief
Accounting Officer
News United States Air Force
 Hagel underscores nuclear mission importance at B-2 basePublished Jan. 14, 2015
                        
                        By Claudette Roulo
                        
                        
                        DoD News, Defense Media Activity
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel opened his final domestic trip with a stop at Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, Jan. 13, home of the 509th Bomb Wing -- the world's only B-2 Spirit stealth bomber unit.
Hagel told Airmen their military service plays a critical role in the nation's security and that service will shape their lives.
The defense secretary said while he'd served "when dinosaurs roamed the Earth," his Army service informed every part of his life that followed.
"It probably did as much to shape me and mold me and affect me as any one experience I ever had in my life," the secretary said. "... Everything I have done in my life, I have drawn from that experience in the military."**Nuclear triad**
The nuclear triad is "always about strategic deterrence," Hagel told the Airmen. "It is about staying ahead, technology-wise, of our adversaries -- those who would want to do great damage to this country and our way of life and our allies'."
Modernization -- particularly of the nuclear enterprise -- is the key to national security, the defense secretary said. 
Military modernization, Hagel added, was interrupted by sequestration and other fiscal difficulties. "That hurt us in many ways," he said, noting that modernization is the one area in which the U.S. cannot afford to fall behind.
"We have paid a lot of attention to that -- especially the last year," Hagel said. "We're committing more resources in our budget that we'll be presenting to Capitol Hill here in the next few weeks, so I want to assure you of that component of your job."**People are important**
The Defense Department cannot afford to lose good people, he said. "We have to continue to assure that we are recruiting and we're bringing good people in to this business, because technology, modernization -- all the components that are critical for our national security -- are only as good as the quality of the people that we have behind those technologies."
Everyone in the military is linked, the defense secretary said. The success of any one service member is tied to the ability of every other service member to succeed, he explained.
"If one of you is weak, or if one of you falls down, or if one of you is not capable, it will affect the entire effort," Hagel said.
This is true in every challenge service members face, he said, from flying 36-hour missions in a B-2 bomber to confronting the problem of sexual assault.secretary of defense 



Chuck Hagel 



Whiteman Air Force Base 



AFGSC 



B-2 Spirit 



nuclear triad 



SecDEF
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 of Wellness Center USA, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Andrew J. Kandalepas, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, Principal Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   Date:  January 14, 2014  /s/ Andrew J. Kandalepas Name:  Andrew J. Kandalepas Title: Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1126 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1126

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2007

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To reauthorize the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and 
                Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 9 of the Steel and 
Aluminum Energy Conservation and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988 
(15 U.S.C. 5108) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 9. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry 
out this Act $12,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2008 through 
2012.''.
    (b) Steel Project Priorities.--Section 4(c)(1) of the Steel and 
Aluminum Energy Conservation and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988 
(15 U.S.C. 5103(c)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (H), by striking ``coatings for sheet 
        steels'' and inserting ``sheet and bar steels''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(K) The development of technologies which reduce 
                greenhouse gas emissions.''.
    (c) Conforming Amendments.--The Steel and Aluminum Energy 
Conservation and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988 is further 
amended--
            (1) by striking section 7 (15 U.S.C. 5106); and
            (2) in section 8 (15 U.S.C. 5107), by inserting ``, 
        beginning with fiscal year 2008,'' after ``close of each fiscal 
        year''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 12, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
HOMESIDE LENDING, INC.
       EXHIBIT 12 - COMPUTATION OF THE RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (Dollar amounts in thousands)


The  following  table  sets  forth the ratio of  earnings  to fixed  charges  of
HomeSide  Lending,  Inc.  for the period from March 1, 1997 to February 10, 1998
and the period from March 16, 1996 to February 28,  1997.  The ratio of earnings
to fixed charges is computedby  dividing net fixed charges  (interest expense on
all debt plus the interest  portion of rent expense) into earnings before income
taxes and fixed charges.




                                  For the Period   For the Period
                                  From                  From
                                    March 1,         March 16,
                                     1997 to          1996 to
                                  February 10,      February 28,
                                      1998              1997
                                  --------------   ---------------

Earnings before income taxes      $     136,870    $       93,195
                                  --------------   ---------------
Interest expense                         81,770            66,833
Interest portion of rental 
   expense                                1,387             1,550
                                  --------------   ---------------
Fixed charges                            83,157            68,383
                                  --------------   ---------------
Earnings before fixed charges           220,027           161,578
                                  --------------   ---------------

Fixed Charges:

Interest expense                         81,770            66,833
Interest portion of rental
expense                                   1,387             1,550
                                  --------------   ---------------
Fixed charges                     $      83,157    $       68,383
                                  --------------   ---------------
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges                           $      2.65      $       2.36
                                  ==============   ===============
#### Thomas Dwyer v. Adrian Testard.

(No. 1893, Op. Book No. *2,*p. 558.)

Error from Washington County.

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1228. *Assignment of errors must be signed by party or counsel.*Rule 97 for district and county courts is im*706perative that the assignment of errors must be signed by the party or his counsel, and a paper purporting to be an assignment of errors, found in the record, but which is not signed by the party or his counsel, will not be considered. •

§ 1229. *Statement of facts; sufficiency of.*In the beginning the paper purports to be a statement of facts, and it concludes, *“We*agree that the above is a correct statement of the facts given in evidence on the trial of this case,” and is signed by counsel for one of the parties, and is indorsed “approved” and signed by the judge who tried the *case. Held,*that the paper was sufficiently authenticated to require it to be considered as a statement of facts. This paper differed from the one held insufficient in Renn v. Samos, 42 Tex. 104. There, there was nothing in the beginning or conclusion of the paper to indicate that it was intended as a statement of facts. A case more in point is McManus v. Wallis, 52 Tex. 534, where a statement of facts authenticated as the one-found in this record was-held sufficient.

§ 1230. *Reconvention in an attachment suit; burden of proof is on defendant to show*what, *etc.*When a defendant in an attachment suit pleads in reconvention,, claiming actual damages against the plaintiff for wrongfully suing out the writ, and exemplary damages for maliciously suing it out without probable cause, the burden is upon him to establish by competent evidence the facts that authorize a recovery. To entitle him to recover actual damages he must show: 1st. That the grounds upon which the writ issued are untrue; and 2d. The damages resulting to him from the issuance of the writ. To entitle him to recover exemplary damages he must establish by competent evidence, in addition to the facts above stated: 1st. That there was no probable cause for plaintiff’s believing that the grounds upon which the attachment issued were true; and 2d. That the plaintiff sued out the writ maliciously.

*707October 3, 1881.

§ 1231. *Belief of plaintiff, if facts are untrue, will not prevent the writ from being lurongful.*It matters not how firmly and sincerely the plaintiff may haye believed the grounds stated in his affidavit for the writ to be true, if they were untrue in fact, the attachment issued wrongfully, and the plaintiff must respond for the actual damages caused the defendant by such wrongful issuance of the writ.

§ 1232. *Malice may be inferred, ivhen; inference repelled, how.*Where it is made to appear that no probable cause existed for the issuance of an attachment, it may be inferred that it was obtained maliciously; but this inference may be repelled by facts and circumstances which show a fair and honest effort to collect a debt believed by the plaintiff to be just.

Reversed and remanded.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                     CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (Dollars in thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Forty Weeks Ended
                                               ---------------------------
                                               November 6,     November 1,
                                                   2000           1999
                                               -----------     -----------
<S>                                             <C>             <C>

Earnings before fixed charges:
    Income (loss) before income taxes and
       extraordinary item ................      $ (76,303)      $ 53,247
Fixed charges ............................         80,203         66,824
                                                ---------       --------
                                                $   3,900       $120,071
                                                =========       ========

Fixed charges:
    Interest expense .....................      $  53,510       $ 42,968
    Interest component of rent expense (1)         26,693         23,856
                                                ---------       --------
                                                $  80,203       $ 66,824
                                                =========       ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges .......           0.0x           1.8x
                                                =========       ========
</TABLE>


----------

(1) Calculated as one-third of total rent expense
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,270
<SECURITIES>                                   221,483
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,896,869
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (53,536)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,072,086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,039
<BONDS>                                      3,156,036
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              803
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     882,208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,072,086
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,461<F1>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,681
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,609
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,609
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,609
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES 52,434 OF INTEREST EXPENSE RELATED TO MORTGAGE LOAN ACTIVITIES
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Wm. Umdenstock v. R. N. McKellar.

(No. 1202, Op. Book No. 3, p. 299.)

Error from Harrison County.

December 14, 1881.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 567. *Jurisdiction of county court; injunction.*Suit was brought to enjoin a judgment rendered by a justice of the peace for $46. The court below dissolved the injunction, which had been granted by the county judge,, and rendered judgment on the injunction bond, against the principal and sureties, for the amount of the judgment in justice’s court and for interest, and for ten per cent, damages. Under repeated decisions of this court, the judgment of the county court must be reversed and the injunction suit dismissed from that court for the want of jurisdiction.

Reversed and dismissed.
12Kt-IHELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 14-12-00956-CR OFFENSE: DWI

STYLE: Phillip Brandon Adkins v The State of Texas COUNTY: Harris

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed TRIAL COURT: Co Crim Ct at Law No. 2

DATE: December 17, 2013 Publish: Yes TC CASE #: 1766984

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Phillip Brandon Adkins v The State of Texas

CCA# 127*-/*

APPELLANT^ Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: ;?«<. /7; :^vy

JUDGE: f^C

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:.

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

PC:_

DNP:

FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
No. 87-911.

#### Continental Group, Inc., et al. *v.*McLendon et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### G. H. & S. A. R. R. Co. v. T. J. Oakes and G. H. Little.

(No. 355, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 245.)

Appeal from Colorado County.

February 27, 1878.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 685. *Defective service of citation in justice’s court cannot be availed of after appearance.*Where the parties appeared in justice’s court, waived a jury, and submitted the matters in controversy to the court, *held,*on appeal, that objections to the service of citation cannot avail defendants after the trial. The defendants were in court for all purposes of a trial.

Art. 4926, Pas. Dig., makes railroads liable for the value of all stock killed or injured by their trains.

§ 686. *Assessment of ten per cent, damages.*Art. 6349, Pas. Dig., passed by the twelfth legislature, was superseded by the act of the fifteenth legislature, p. 154, organizing justices’ courts. Under this last law the presr ent case originated. There is no provision in it, nor in the act organizing the county court and defining its jurisdiction, which authorizes the imposition of ten per cent, damages. The county court, being a court of-limited jurisdiction, cannot exceed the powers granted it by law, organic or statutory.

Reversed and remanded.