alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 US, Japanese rescue squadrons participate in exercise Keen SwordPublished Nov. 14, 2014
                        
                        By 2nd Lt. Erik Anthony
                        
                        
                        18th Wing Public Affairs
                **KOMATSU AIR BASE, Japan (AFNS) --**
                Personnel from the Japan Self Defense Force are teaming up with Kadena Air Base's 33rd Rescue Squadron and Eielson Air Force Base's 212th Rescue Squadron in support of a Japan-wide, joint-bilateral exercise that will run until Nov. 19.
Exercise Keen Sword is a bilateral field training exercise held biennially since 1986. The exercise is designed to increase the interoperability of U.S.  and Japanese forces to effectively and mutually provide for the defense of Japan, or respond to a regional crisis or contingency situation in the Asia-Pacific region.
During the exercise, Japanese service members will work hand-in-hand with U.S. military members from the 33rd and 212th RQS. They will participate in a wide range of simulated rescue operations while working to improve the interoperability required to respond to a potential crisis.
"It's great to have the U.S. here to conduct joint-bilateral training that's applicable to real world scenarios," said Lt. Col. Hiroshi Kageura, the Komatsu Air Rescue Squadron commander with the Japanese forces.
The goal of the rescue squadrons during Keen Sword 2015 is not only to validate and refine cooperation in the defense of Japan, but also to further improve upon incident response procedures in the event of a natural disaster.
"Rescue operations are important during peacetime and wartime environments," Kageura said. "More lives can be saved through bilateral operations."
The exercise allows military service members to improve their rescue capabilities through joint training and helps build bilateral confidence and strong working relationships.
"It's always a great when we have the opportunity to work with our Japanese counterparts and build upon our relationship," said Lt. Col. Jameson Dugdale, the 33rd RQS deployed commander. "This exercise strengthens our partnership by giving us the chance to work together, share cultures and test tactics."Japan 



Keen Sword 



exercise 



Japan Self Defense Force 



Kadena Air Base
News United States Air Force
 Goldfein addresses readiness, budgetPublished March 16, 2016
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Whitney Stanfield
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs Command Information
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Military vice chiefs testified about the current state of readiness of U.S. forces before the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support on Capitol Hill March 15.Air Force Vice Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein shared concerns about the service’s ability to continue to defend against adversaries who continue to improve their capabilities.The vice chief told the committee that America’s adversaries are closing the capability gap in space and cyberspace. According to Goldfein, the strategic capability advantage over competitors is shrinking, and the ability to project strategic deterrence is being challenged.He stated that the Air Force continues to provide the lion’s share of military effort against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant in the Middle East and is heavily active in Afghanistan. He added that a return of sequestration would impair and delay readiness goals.“The fiscal year 2017 budget reflects our best efforts to balance capability, capacity and readiness under the top line we receive,” Goldfein said. “We’ve made difficult trades between readiness today and the critical investment required to modernize for the future against potential adversaries who continue to close the technological gap.”The full-spectrum readiness capability is the right amount of Airmen, properly led, trained and equipped, to accomplish the mission in support of the joint force, and this cannot be achieved without investing in total force Airmen, the vice chief said.Readiness is measured by critical skills availability, weapons system sustainment and training resource availability, as well as the flying hour program and manageable operational tempo. In order for the Air Force to maintain its advantage, sufficient funding, more manpower and better deployment-to-dwell time ratios are needed to balance readiness across the board.The Army and Marine Corps, Goldfein said, depend on responsive airlift, not less airlift. The Air Force must have the capability to engage anytime, anywhere and complete readiness to provide reliable strategic nuclear deterrent.   “This budget request is an investment in the Air Force our nation needs,” he said. “America expects it, combatant commanders require it, and with your support for this budget request, our Airmen will deliver it.”readiness 



VCSAF 



capitol hill 



Congress 



hearing 



testimony 



budget
#### Marbut-Williams Lumber Co. *v.*Dixie Electric Co. *et al.*

Mechanics’ Liens, 40 C. J. p. 268, n. 96; p. 293, n. 56.

Hill, J.

1. “The Civil Code, § 3352, provides for liens for ‘all contractors, materialmen, and persons furnishing material for the improvement of real estate.’ The liens so specified are created by the same statute, are of the same character, and governed by the same principles of law. . . When a contractor or materialman has done work or furnished material for the improvement of real estate, their liens when declared and created, as provided in the Civil Code (1910), § 3353, attach *from the time the work under the contract is commenced*or the material is furnished, as against third persons having actual notice of such liens.” *Guaranty Investment Co.*v. *Athens Engineering Co.,*152 *Ga.*596 (5), (6) (110 S. E. 873).

2. A lien of a contractor or materialman on real estate, arising under §§ 3352, 3353, attaches from the time the work under the contract is commenced or the material is furnished. *Oglethorpe Savings & Trust Co.*v. *Morgan,*149 *Ga.*787 (102 S. E. 528).

3. In the light of what has been held above, a contractor’s lien under this statute can not attach or exist prior to delivery of any of the material; and it follows that a holder of legal title to realty, under a security deed executed by the owner and duly recorded prior to delivery of material furnished to such owner for improvement of the realty, can not at the time of taking the security be affected with notice of any lien which the materialman may set up for material furnished to improve the property.

4. Under application of the foregoing principles, where an owner of vacant realty, desiring to improve the same, negotiated a loan for the purpose of meeting his pay-rolls, and for the purpose of securing a loan executed a security deed for the amount thereof to the lender, which purported to convey the legal title, and the deed was duly recorded; *43and where, at the time of making the loan, the owner, with the knowledge of the lender, arranged with materialmen to furnish material to be used in the improvement, but no material was actually furnished until the day next after the security deed was recorded; and subsequently, in an equitable action a contest arose between the materialmen and the holder of the security deed, based on competition between that deed and the lien duly declared and foreclosed, the holder of the security deed was entitled to prevail, and the judge did not err in directing a verdict in his favor.

No. 6053.

February 18, 1928.

Equitable petition. Before Judge E. D. Thomas. Eulton superior court. March 31, 1927.

*McElreath & Scott,*for plaintiff in error.

*H. A. Etheridge,*contra.

See *Bennett Lumber Co.*v. *Martin,*132 *Ga.*491 (64 S. E. 484) ; *Englehart-Hitchcock Co.*v. *Central Investment Co.,*136 *Ga.*564 (71 S. E. 787) ; *Willingham-Tift Lumber Co.*v. *Barnes,*147 *Ga.*209 (93 S. E. 201); *Milner*v. *Wellhouse,*148 *Ga.*275 (96 S. E. 566).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
583 A.2d 300

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CHARLES NEIMAN.

January 10, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


	$10,000.00	October 1, 2014



 


FOR
GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, THE RECEIPT AND SUFFICIENCY OF WHICH IS ACKNOWLEDGED, Clearwater Ventures Inc. ("Maker")
hereby promises to pay to the order of CC Fund LLC ("Holder") at Las Vegas, Nevada, or at such other place as Holder
shall designate, the sum of ten thousand United States Dollars ($10,000.00) with interest at the rate of six percent (6.0%) per
annum until paid. 


 


All
accrued interest and principal shall be due and payable at the sooner of (i) ninety days from written demand by Holder delivered
via first class US mail to the address below, or (ii) two years from the date of this Note.


 


If
not so paid and at the option of Holder, or its assigns, all principal and interest, shall become immediately due and payable
without notice.


 


This
Note may be prepaid, in whole or in part, at any time and without penalty. 


 


Interest
shall be computed on the basis of a 365-day year or 366-day year as applicable, and actual days lapsed. Maker shall have the privilege
of prepaying the principal under this Note in whole or in part, without penalty or premium at any time. All payments hereunder
shall be applied first to interest, then to principal.


 


All
parties to this Note hereby waive presentment, dishonor, notice of dishonor and protest. All parties hereto consent to, and Holder
is hereby expressly authorized to make, without notice, any and all renewals, extensions, modifications or waivers of the time
for or the terms of payment of any sum or sums due hereunder, or under any documents or instruments relating to or securing this
Note, or of the performance of any covenants, conditions or agreements hereof or thereof or the taking or release of collateral
securing this Note. Any such action taken by Holder shall not discharge the liability of any party to this Note.


 


This
Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Nevada without regard to conflict of law principles.
Maker shall also pay Holder any and all costs of collection incurred in connection with this Note, including court costs and reasonable
attorney’s fees.


 


	MAKER

         

        /s/ Tuston Brown

        



        Clearwater
        Ventures, Inc.

        8174
        Las Vegas Blvd S., Ste 109

        Las
        Vegas, NV 89123

         

        By:
        Tuston Brown

        Its:
        President
#### St. Louis, I. M. & S. R’y Co. v. Elias Jackson.

(No. 2618.)

November 9, 1887.

Appeal from Bowie County.

Todd & Hudgins, counsel for appellant.

Vaughan & Leary, counsel for appellee.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 327. *Minor may sue by next friend, when.*Elias Jackson, a minor, brought and prosecuted this suit by his next friend. Said minor had no guardian in this state, but had a mother and step-father residing in the state of Arkansas. *Held:*It is well settled that a minor who has no guardian may, in this state, maintain a suit by his next friend. (Hays v. Hays, 66 Tex. 606; R’y Co. v. Styron, id. 421.) The fact that Jackson had a natural guardian residing in another state did not deprive him of the right to maintain this suit by his next friend.

Affirmed.
SCIENTIFIC CERTIFICATION SYSTEMS
 Park Plaza Building, 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 400, Oakland, California 94612
          Tel 510 832-1415; Fax 510 832-0359; Web: http://www.scsl.com



19 June 1997

Mr. Gary Haer
Soy Environmental Products, Inc.
9135 Barton St.
Overland Park, Kansas 66214
FAX:     913-599-2923
PHONE:   913-599-0800


Dear Mr. Haer:

Congratulations  on the  certification  of your five  products.  With this comes
original  certificates  attesting to the final certification of each product and
the art work for carrying the SCS environmental label (logo and claims language)
on your product label and in your marketing literature.

Please  remember,   these  product  certifications  are  for  the  five  product
formulations  that you have submitted  without a fragrance or reodorant.  I look
forward  to  modifying  your  certifications  in the near  future  to  include a
fragrance  or  reodorant  as soon as you are  able to find one  that  meets  SCS
criteria.

I have  mailed  the art work for use on your  product  labels  directly  to Dawn
Cochran of Osborn and Barr per your instructions. I sent Dawn both hard copy and
electronic copy as requested. She should have both by Friday 20 June 1997.

Again, Congratulations!!!!

Please  let me know if there is  anything  else I can do to be of service to you
and your company.


Sincerely,

/s/ Chet Chaffee

Chet Chaffee
SCS
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 93 

Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 

Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2008 

Mr. CROWLEY (for himself, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. BERMAN, Ms. ROSLEHTINEN, Ms. WATSON, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. HOLT, and Mr. PITTS) 

introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in 

the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress approves the renewal of the import restric4 tions contained in section 3(a)(1) of the Burmese Freedom 

5 and Democracy Act of 2003. 

Æ 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
#### Celeste BOURGEOIS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. State of RHODE ISLAND, et al., Defendants, Appellees.

No. 99-2129.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Jan. 10, 2001.

Celeste Bourgeois, on brief, pro se.

Sheldon Whitehouse, Attorney General and J.O. Alston, Special Assistant Attorney General, on brief, for appellees.

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge, BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge, and STAHL, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

After a thorough review of the record and of the parties’ submissions, we affirm, essentially for the reasons set out by the magistrate judge in his report and recommendation, dated August 5, 1999. We add only that even if judgment had not been entered previously by the state court, appellant received everything she was entitled to receive under R.I. Gen. Laws § 12-25-6(b) (1998); no alleged promises by state officials or others can change that, *6and her misunderstanding of the terms of the settlement cannot alter our analysis. Given this, any alleged error by the district court in ordering certain subpoenas quashed is harmless at best. Despite appellant’s reasonable criticisms of the adequacy and speed of the victim’s compensation system in Rhode Island, this court obligated to affirm.

*Affirmed. See*1st Cir. Loc. R. 27(c).
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,752-01

EX PARTE JOHNNY E. ALEXANDER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR11-295A IN THE 235TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM COOKE COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of intentional or knowing injury to a child causing serious bodily

injury and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Eighth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. 

Alexander v. State, 08-14-00135-CR (Tex. App.–El Paso Jan. 30, 2017). Applicant filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

Applicant contends that was denied his right to file a PDR because appellate counsel failed

to timely notify him that his appeal had been affirmed. The current record suggests that Applicant

made reasonable efforts to inquire about the status of his pending appeal but that appellate counsel

never responded to his inquiries. The district clerk properly forwarded this application to this Court
under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 73.4(b)(5). Under the circumstances, however, additional

facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960),

the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. 

We remand this application to the trial court to conduct an evidentiary investigation and

make findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court shall provide appellate counsel with

an opportunity to respond to Applicant’s allegations. If appropriate, the trial court shall order a copy

of the prison mail log of Applicant’s legal mail during the relevant time period(s) to establish

whether and when Applicant sent and received mail from his appellate attorney and the appellate

court. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). If the

trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorneyto represent

Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from the date of this

order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s findings and

conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things, affidavits, motions,

objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from hearings and depositions.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and

obtained from this Court. 

Filed: February 12, 2020 

Do not publish
#### STATE ex rel. Jacob M. BELL, Sr. v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2012-KH-1990.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 12, 2012.

In re Bell Sr., Jacob M.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 2012-187773; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2012 KW 0532.

Denied. Moot.
583 A.2d 330

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TERRANCE N. KENNEDY.

February 27, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 433 

Expressing support for the designation of October as ‘‘National Audiology 

Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2008 

Mr. ROSS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of October as 

‘‘National Audiology Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas hearing loss is the third most common health problem in the United States and approximately 17 percent 

(36,000,000) adults in the United States report that they 

have some degree of hearing loss; 

Whereas although hearing problems are commonly associated 

with the normal aging process, more than half of all 

hearing impaired persons are under the age of 65; 

Whereas hearing difficulties are often unrecognized by the 

people involved, and as a result most people wait 7 to 10 

years after first suspecting hearing loss before seeking 

help; 


PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 433 IH 

Whereas the first step in treatment of a hearing problem is 

a diagnostic hearing evaluation by an audiologist; 

Whereas audiologists, whose academic and clinical training 

provides the foundation for patient management from 

birth through adulthood, are dedicated healthcare professionals who diagnose, treat, and manage individuals with 

hearing loss or balance problems; 

Whereas the American Academy of Audiology is recognized 

for promoting quality hearing and balance care by advancing the profession of audiology through leadership, 

advocacy, education, public awareness, and support of research; 

Whereas October would be the appropriate month to designate as ‘‘National Audiology Awareness Month’’; and 

Whereas there is a need for greater awareness of the hearing 

and balance care provided by audiologists on the part of 

the public, including diagnosis and treatment options, research needs, and public policy implications: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Audi4 ology Awareness Month’’; and 

5 (2) applauds the actions of audiologists, includ6 ing clinicians, researchers, and others who strive to 

7 raise public awareness of hearing and balance care 

8 by advancing the profession of audiology. 

Æ 


PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                                          0000773136
<NAME>                                         Ramsay Health Care, Inc.
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                         6,015,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  27,663,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,799,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               42,854,000
<PP&E>                                         95,204,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 29,280,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,323,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          35,790,000
<BONDS>                                        39,531,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    233,000
<COMMON>                                       89,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     46,546,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,323,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               31,535,000
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  27,640,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,313,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               889,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,545,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                148,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            148,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   148,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.01
        


</TABLE>