alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2848 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to apportionments 

under the Airport Improvement Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 16), 2014 

Mr. ENZI (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. FRANKEN, Mrs. FISCHER, and Mr. 

HEINRICH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to 

apportionments under the Airport Improvement Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Airport Regula5 tion Relief Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPORTIONMENTS. 

7 Section 47114(c)(1) of title 49, United States Code, 

8 is amended by adding at the end the following: 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2848 IS

1 ‘‘(G) SPECIAL RULE FOR FISCAL YEARS

2 2015 THROUGH 2017.—Notwithstanding sub3 paragraph (A), the Secretary shall apportion to 

4 the sponsor of an airport under that subpara5 graph, for each of fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 

6 2017, an amount based on the number of pas7 senger boardings at the airport during calendar 

8 year 2012 if the airport had— 

9 ‘‘(i) fewer than 10,000 passenger 

10 boardings during the calendar year used to 

11 calculate the apportionment for fiscal year 

12 2015, 2016, or 2017 under subparagraph 

13 (A); and 

14 ‘‘(ii) 10,000 or more passenger 

15 boardings during calendar year 2012.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 20-5019 September Term, 2020

1:19-cv-01788-UNA

Filed On: October 5, 2020

Benjamin Cunningham,

Appellant

v.

Administrative Office of the United States

Courts, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Henderson and Tatel, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit

Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the amended brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.

App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed January 2, 2020,

be affirmed. The notice of appeal is timely only as to the order denying reconsideration. 

See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), (a)(4)(a). Appellant has not shown that the district court

abused its discretion in denying his motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing

the case as duplicative of an amended complaint filed by appellant in a separate

lawsuit. See Owens v. Republic of Sudan, 864 F.3d 751, 818 (D.C. Cir. 2017); see also

Zerilli v. Evening News Ass’n, 628 F.2d 217, 222 (D.C. Cir. 1980) (“[A] plaintiff has no

right to maintain two separate actions involving the same subject matter at the same

time in the same court and against the same defendant.”) (citation and internal

quotation marks omitted).
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 20-5019 September Term, 2020

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOHN MELVIN FOSTER, JR.

,

Appellant

.

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

State. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 22

- 00 1 81

- C R

Appeal from

112 th District Court

of Reagan C ounty, Texas

(TC# 02013 )

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right

of appeal. T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with the trial

court clerk within t hirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s right of

appeal as required by T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2 (d). The trial court clerk shall prepare a

supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no later than

December 2 , 2022

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18 th d ay of October , 20 2 2

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22- 0131 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOHNATHAN JAMES,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 21, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 16 2022

08/16/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0131
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0030

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CORENA MARIE MOUNTAIN CHIEF,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 25, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 16 2021

09/16/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0030
#### Henry Williams v. Moody & Jemison.

(No. 1290, Op. Book No. 2, p. 504.)

Appeal from Galveston County.

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 805. *Affidavit in lieu of appeal bond.*The affidavit made in lieu of an appeal bond was that “he is a poor *457man, ancl is unable to pay the costs of said appeal, or to give security therefor.” *Held*insufficient. It should have stated further that he was unable to pay *any part*of the costs of appeal. [R. S. 1400, 1401.]

February 4, 1882.

Appeal dismissed.'
Order entered May 1, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00093-CR

DAVID HENRY BROOMFIELD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1433325-J

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On April 1, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the 

reporter’s record had not been filed. On May 1, 2015, we received the reporter’s record. 

Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the April 1, 2015 order 

requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### JOSEPH GUERRIERO v. WILLIAM KOHLHEPP AND JIHBIN HWANG & YU HWANG.

March 13, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0655 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ROBERT GONZALEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 19 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 13 2020

05/13/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0655
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS LEGEND CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DIME BANCORP,
INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         307,639
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           9,655
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                40,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               190,673
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,836,767
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     15,973,014
<ALLOWANCE>                                    137,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,601,151
<DEPOSITS>                                  13,293,748
<SHORT-TERM>                                 6,092,677
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            374,850
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,365,367
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,203
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,473,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              22,601,151
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                835,668
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              196,445
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,272
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,033,385
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             354,111
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             608,754
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          424,631
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   22,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (924)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                549,773
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                287,983
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     181,609
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,127)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   177,482
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.92
<LOANS-NON>                                     70,815
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                10,933
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               105,081
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   14,858
<RECOVERIES>                                     7,089
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              137,077
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           127,077
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         10,000


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6264

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES KANE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Bryson City. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (2:08-cr-00024-MR-DLH-1; 

1:16-cv-00146-MR)

Submitted: December 14, 2017 Decided: December 19, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua B. Carpenter, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, 

INC., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anthony Joseph Enright, Assistant 

United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, 

North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Kane appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255 (2012) motion, filed pursuant to authorization from this court. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order

and deny Kane’s motion to accelerate the processing of the appeal. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           8,565
<SECURITIES>                                     7,620
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,659
<ALLOWANCES>                                       325
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,474
<PP&E>                                          10,321
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,061
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,037
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,031
<SALES>                                          6,133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,360
<CGS>                                            1,325
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,774
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (535)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (160)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (375)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 16

- 5133

_____________________________
J ENNIFER M ARLIANA L AND , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County

. Allen L. Register, Judge

. February 5 , 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , R OWE , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joanna A. Mauer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5385]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          CONGRESS MUST PROVIDE OVERSIGHT OF FEDERAL AGENCIES

  (Mr. TRAFICANT asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. TRAFICANT. Mr. Speaker, since Oklahoma City, many politicians are 
choosing their words very carefully, many times afraid to say what they 
really feel. The truth is, Mr. Speaker, many Americans are fed up with 
the Government. They are sick and tired, to be exact. They are 
beginning to question the news stories and the Government spin.
  Most Americans did not believe all the stories about the 
assassination of JFK. Many Americans do not believe the Government's 
account of Waco. Many Americans do not believe what happened in Ruby 
Ridge with the Weaver family. Many Americans still have questions about 
the Government's side of PanAmerican 103.
  The truth is, Mr. Speaker, Congress had better take its head out of 
the sand, because Congress has allowed agencies like ATF and the IRS to 
rip off the American people. They know it and they do feel abandoned. 
If the Congress does not provide the oversight that is necessary, the 
American people will.
  We cannot justify nor condone violence, do not get me wrong. However, 
Congress has allowed these agencies to go without oversight, and the 
American people are fed up. Take a look at it and read the tea leaves.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 EOD aids remote civil officials in dynamite disposalPublished Sept. 22, 2015
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Shawn Nickel
                        
                        
                        354th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **DELTA JUNCTION, Alaska (AFNS) --**
                Three explosive ordnance disposal Airmen from the 354th Civil Engineer Squadron at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, were dispatched 78 miles to lend support to a volunteer fire department and Alaska State Troopers Sept. 20.
The EOD technicians removed and disposed of 65 deteriorating sticks of dynamite and other explosives in an operation under a defense support to civil authorities agreement.
"The explosives were from the late 60s and were deteriorating to the point where they could have been dangerous if handled incorrectly," said Master Sgt. Harold Horton, the 354th CES noncommissioned officer in charge of EOD.
The seeping box of TNT was found in a resident's garage and reported to local law enforcement. According to officials, explosives were common in the area when gold mines and farms were being developed.
The local state troopers and the local Rural Deltana Volunteer Fire Department have neither the equipment nor the expertise to dispose of explosives, so the Air Force technicians spent days planning the disposal with the local officials.
"The closest bomb squad is in Valdez or Anchorage, eight hours away and it’s not feasible for them to respond places like this," Horton said. "This kind of operation not only helps the community, but it gives us an opportunity to expose our newer Airmen to situations to develop safety habits in a semi-controlled environment."
After the explosives were carefully removed from the property they were safely disposed of by controlled detonation on the dry bed of the Tanana River. The state troopers and fire department provided security and traffic control.
"We have never been trained, or have experience with something like this," said Tim Castleberry, the Rural Deltana Volunteer Fire Department chief. "When we inform citizens around the affected area they are much more comfortable knowing we have the experts here to do things safely, that's just not something we could do without the support of the base."
Eielson's EOD technicians, who form the smallest operational flight in the Air Force, respond around the northern part of the state covering an area of responsibility larger than the entire state of Texas when local civil authorities call for the mutual aid.Alaska 



EOD 



dynamite disposal 



PACAF 



Eielson AFB
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6912]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                    EXECUTIVE REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

  The following executive reports of committees were submitted:

       By Mr. HATCH, from the Committee on the Judiciary:
       John Garvan Murtha, of Vermont, to be U.S. District Judge 
     for the District of Vermont.
       George K. McKinney, of Maryland, to be U.S. Marshal for the 
     District of Maryland for the term of 4 years.
       Rose Ochi, of California, to be an Associate Director for 
     National Drug Control Policy.
       Susan Y. Illston, of California, to be U.S. District Judge 
     for the Northern District of California.
       George A. O'Toole, Jr., of Massachusetts, to be U.S. 
     District Judge for the District of Massachusetts vice an 
     additional position in accordance with 28 USC 133(b)(1).
       Mary Beck Briscoe, of Kansas, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for 
     the Tenth Circuit.
       Patrick M. Ryan, of Oklahoma, to be U.S. Attorney for the 
     Western District of Oklahoma for the term of 4 years.

  (The above nominations were reported with the recommendation that 
they be confirmed, subject to the nominees' commitment to respond to 
requests to appear and testify before any duly constituted committee of 
the Senate.)

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                          85,211
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,586,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 28,272,897
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,749,727
<PP&E>                                       8,461,772
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,300,825
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,801,591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,196,462
<BONDS>                                     24,751,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,015,192
<COMMON>                                       138,856
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,109,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,801,591
<SALES>                                     13,305,070
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,305,070
<CGS>                                       12,136,416
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,136,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,080,551
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             588,727
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,477,306)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (546,603)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (930,703)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (930,703)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>