alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NOVA
INTERNATIONAL FILMS, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 
APRIL 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY  BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                6,943
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      6,943
<PP&E>                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        6,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,800
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                              736
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                            8,197,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          6,943
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      0
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      1,183
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (1,183)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (1,183)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          (1,183)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .000


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0099

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RUSTY DEWAYNE WAGONER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 19, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 13 2020

07/13/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0099
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



 EXHIBIT 10(b) 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 WHEREAS, Seacoast Financial Services Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Holding Company”) and the parent company for Compass
Bank for Savings, a Massachusetts chartered savings bank, with its executive offices in New Bedford, Massachusetts (the “Bank,” and together with the Holding Company, the “Employers”) and James P. McDonough of Hanover,
Massachusetts (the “Executive”) are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated October 20, 2003 (the “Employment Agreement”) which Employment Agreement is effective as of the consummation of the Merger (as defined in the
Employment Agreement); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Employers and
the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement in accordance with Section 15.10 thereof; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Employers and the Executive, intending to the legally bound, do hereby agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:

  
 1.    Section 7.4 of the Employment
Agreement is amended by adding the following subsection 7.4(j) to the end of subsection 7.4(i) thereof: 
  
 “(j) The relocation of the Executive’s place of employment to a location more than 35 miles from each of (x) the Employers’ present main
offices and (y) the Executive’s residence.” 
  
 2.    Section 9.2 of the Employment Agreement is amended by deleting such section thereof in its entirety and replacing it with the following: 
  
 “9.2 Lump Sum Severance Payment. A lump sum severance payment equal to three times the average of the sum of the
Executive’s W-2 compensation plus contributions made on the Executive’s behalf to the Bank’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan and 401(k) Plan for the three calendar years preceding the date of termination.” 
  
 3.    Except as so amended, the Employment Agreement in
all other respects is hereby confirmed. 
  
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Holding Company and the Executive have executed this Amendment as of the 4th day of December, 2003. 
  

	SEACOAST FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/S/    KEVIN G. CHAMPAGNE
	 	

	 	 	Title: President and CEO


  
  

	Executive
		
	 	 	/S/    JAMES P. MCDONOUGH
	 	

	 	 	James P. McDonough
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1239 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Underground Railroad Network to 

Freedom Act of 1998 to authorize additional funding 

to carry out the Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1239 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Underground 

3 Railroad Network to Freedom Amendments Act of 2007’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZING APPROPRIATIONS FOR SPECIFIC 

5 PURPOSES. 

6 The National Underground Railroad Network to 

7 Freedom Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 469l et seq.) is amend8 ed— 

9 (1) by striking section 3(d); 

10 (2) by striking section 4(d); and 

11 (3) by adding at the end the following new sec12 tion: 

13 ‘‘SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

14 ‘‘(a) AMOUNTS.—There are authorized to be appro15 priated to carry out this Act $2,500,000 for each fiscal 

16 year, to be allocated as follows: 

17 ‘‘(1) $2,000,000 is to be used for the purposes 

18 of section 3. 

19 ‘‘(2) $500,000 is to be used for the purposes of 

20 section 4. 

21 ‘‘(b) RESTRICTIONS.—No amounts may be appro22 priated for the purposes of this Act except to the Secretary 

23 for carrying out the responsibilities of the Secretary as 

24 set forth in this Act.’’. 
3 

•HR 1239 EH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 The amendments made by section 2 shall take effect 

3 at the beginning of the fiscal year immediately following 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1239 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Underground Railroad Netpurposes. tional funding to carry out the Act, and for other work to Freedom Act of 1998 to authorize addi-
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Voluntary application processing continues during force management pause

              - Published  March 12, 2014

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  **
Late last week, Air Force officials initiated a strategic pause to all force management programs to fully evaluate potential changes to the timing, composition and eligibility criteria for each program based on budget adjustments and early lessons learned.

“Complex strategies are rarely perfect from their inception but evolve as new information and feedback allows them to be refined and improved,” said Lt. Gen. Sam Cox, the Air Force deputy chief of staff for manpower, personnel and services. “The same is true of the Air Force’s current force management programs.”

During the pause, the general encourages eligible officers and enlisted Airmen to continue applying for the Temporary Early Retirement Authority and Voluntary Separation Pay programs. The current TERA application window remains open to March 26 and the VSP application window is open to May 1.

“Today, in some specific categories, the applications are being fully processed and approved; for other categories we are very close on final programmatic decisions and delegated decision authorities which will allow us to finish processing applications and begin notifying Airmen of the status of their applications,” Cox said.

Each application will be evaluated on its own merits within each particular Air Force specialty code, grade and year group. Cox said decisions will focus on the needs of the Air Force mission and take into account such factors as remaining active-duty service commitment, pending assignment and commander recommendations.

“When we first announced our force management programs, we noted the dynamic environment would certainly result in changes as we balance being responsive to Air Force needs with remaining fair, understandable and transparent for our Airmen,” Cox said. “Clear and quick communication of any future changes to the field will be a continuing priority.”

Cox said Airmen should continue to reference official Air Force sources for the most up-to-date information on force management programs. Official news regarding these programs is published to www.af.mil and www.afpc.af.mil.

For more information about promotions and other personnel issues, visit the myPers website at https://mypers.af.mil.

*(Courtesy of Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs)*

force managementVSPTERA
II 

Calendar No. 142 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1080 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2007 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To modify the boundaries of Grand Teton National Park 

to include certain land within the GT Park Subdivision, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Grand Teton National 

5 Park Extension Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) PARK.—The term ‘‘Park’’ means the Grand 

9 Teton National Park. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

HR 1080 PCS

1 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of the Interior. 

3 (3) SUBDIVISION.—The term ‘‘Subdivision’’ 

4 means the GT Park Subdivision, with an area of ap5 proximately 49.67 acres, as generally depicted on— 

6 (A) the plat recorded in the Office of the 

7 Teton County Clerk and Recorder on December 

8 16, 1997, numbered 918, entitled ‘‘Final Plat 

9 GT Park Subdivision’’, and dated June 18, 

10 1997; and 

11 (B) the map entitled ‘‘2006 Proposed 

12 Grand Teton Boundary Adjustment’’, numbered 

13 136/80,198, and dated March 21, 2006, which 

14 shall be on file and available for inspection in 

15 appropriate offices of the National Park Serv16 ice. 

17 SEC. 3. ACQUISITION OF LAND. 

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may accept from 

19 any willing donor the donation of any land or interest in 

20 land of the Subdivision. 

21 (b) ADMINISTRATION.—On acquisition of land or an 

22 interest in land under subsection (a), the Secretary shall— 

23 (1) include the land or interest in the bound24 aries of the Park; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

HR 1080 PCS

1 (2) administer the land or interest as part of 

2 the Park, in accordance with all applicable laws (in3 cluding regulations). 

4 (c) DEADLINE FOR ACQUISITION.—It is the intent of 

5 Congress that the acquisition of land or an interest in land 

6 under subsection (a) be completed not later than 1 year 

7 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

8 (d) RESTRICTION ON TRANSFER.—The Secretary 

9 shall not donate, sell, exchange, or otherwise transfer any 

10 land acquired under this section without express author11 ization from Congress. 

12 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

13 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sec14 retary such sums as are necessary to carry out this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Calendar No. 142 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1080 

AN ACT 

To modify the boundaries of Grand Teton National 

Subdivision, and for other purposes. Park to include certain land within the GT Park 

MAY 8, 2007 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 98 

Expressing the sense of Congress that provisions that provoke veto threats 

from the President should not be included on bills that appropriate 

funds for the implementation of recommendations of the Base Closure 

and Realignment Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2007 

Mr. TIAHRT (for himself, Mrs. DRAKE, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. SMITH

of Texas, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. HAYES, Mr. KLINE

of Minnesota, and Mr. CALVERT) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that provisions that provoke veto threats from the President should not be included on bills that appropriate funds for the implementation of recommendations of the Base Closure and Realignment Commission. 

Whereas Congress and President George W. Bush approved 

the final recommendations of the Defense Base Closure 

and Realignment Commission under the 2005 round of 

defense base closure and realignment; 

Whereas these recommendations propose major changes in 

the positioning of United States military personnel; 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 98 IH 

Whereas the Department of Defense is moving rapidly to implement these recommendations; 

Whereas the communities near military installations that are 

slated to receive major troop increases have already invested time and capital in making preparations for upcoming increases in population; and 

Whereas funding these recommendations on an annual basis 

is absolutely necessary for their implementation and the 

economic confidence of the communities that are expecting increases in population: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that Con3 gress should not include provisions that provoke veto 

4 threats from the President in bills that appropriate funds 

5 for the implementation of recommendations of the Base 

6 Closure and Realignment Commission. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 87 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 87

Supporting the goals and ideals of a world day of remembrance for road 
                             crash victims.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2007

   Mr. Wexler (for himself, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Tom Davis of 
   Virginia, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Payne, Mr. Boren, Mr. Serrano, Ms. 
McCollum of Minnesota, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Lee, Mr. Engel, Mr. Crowley, 
Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mr. Braley of Iowa, Mr. Hastings of Florida, and 
 Mr. Lantos) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the goals and ideals of a world day of remembrance for road 
                             crash victims.

Whereas 40,000 people in the United States, and 1,200,000 people globally, die 
        in road crashes each year;
Whereas another 20,000,000 to 50,000,000 people globally are injured each year 
        as a result of speeding motor vehicles, the increasing use of motor 
        vehicles, and rapid urbanization;
Whereas the World Health Organization has predicted that by the year 2020 the 
        annual number of deaths from motor vehicle crashes is likely to surpass 
        the annual number of deaths from AIDS;
Whereas the current estimated cost of motor vehicle crashes worldwide is 
        $518,000,000,000 annually, representing between 3 and 5 percent of the 
        gross domestic product of each nation;
Whereas over 90 percent of motorist-related deaths occur in low- and middle-
        income countries;
Whereas according to the World Health Organization motorist-related deaths and 
        costs continue to rise in these countries due to a lack of appropriate 
        road engineering and injury prevention programs in public health 
        sectors; and
Whereas the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution designating the 
        third Sunday of November as a day of remembrance for road crash victims 
        and their families, and called on nations globally to improve road 
        safety: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That Congress--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of a world day of 
        remembrance for road crash victims; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to support 
        and participate in programs and activities to commemorate a 
        world day of remembrance for road crash victims with 
        appropriate ceremonies, programs, and other activities.
                                 <all>
```
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

** The Honorable J. Thomas Marten, District Judge, United States District

Court for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

OCT 28 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ERNEST DERVON LINDSEY, JR.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

RON CHAMPION,

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 96-6416

(D.C. No. CIV-95-433-T)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO and LUCERO, Circuit Judges, and MARTEN,** District Judge.

After examining petitioner’s appellate brief and the appellate record, this

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist

the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. 

The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
1 Because petitioner filed his habeas petition in 1995, before enactment of

the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Pub. L. No.

104-132, 110 Stat.1214, AEDPA’s certificate of appealability requirements do not

apply to this appeal. See United States v. Kunzman, ___ F.3d ___, No. 96-1310,

1997 WL 602507, at *1 n.2 (10th Cir. Oct. 1, 1997). Instead, the pre-AEDPA 

certificate of probable cause requirements apply here. Regardless of the label we

attach to the requirements, petitioner’s substantive burden is the same, see

Lennox v. Evans, 87 F.3d 431, 434 (10th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 746

(1997), overruled in part by, Kunzman, 1997 WL 602507 at *1 n.2, so we will

construe his application for a certificate of appealability as an application for a

certificate of probable cause.

-2-

Petitioner seeks review of the district court’s order denying his petition for

habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Before petitioner can proceed on appeal,

however, he must secure a certificate of probable cause from this court, pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2253.1 Based upon our review of the record as a whole, we

conclude that petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of a denial of a

constitutional right.
-3-

We, therefore, DENY the application for a certificate of probable cause,

and DISMISS the appeal.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Carlos F. Lucero 

Circuit Judge
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Post Office Box 12248

Austin, Texas 78711

(512) 463-1312

Tuesday, December 22, 2015

Mr. Christopher Prine

Clerk, First Court of Appeals

301 Fannin

Houston, TX 77002

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 12-0255

Court of Appeals Number: 01-09-00997-CV

Trial Court Number: 2006-80212

Style: GENE E. PHILLIPS, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A PHILLIPS OIL INTERESTS,

LLC, EURENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION, SYNTEK WEST, INC.,

CABELTEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, NATRON INVESTMENTS, A&B

CAPITAL CORPORATION, SOUTHMARK CORPORATION, BASIC CAPITAL

MANAGEMENT, INC

v.

CARLTON ENERGY GROUP, LLC

Dear Mr. Prine:

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Texas is final in the above referenced cause and

the enclosed mandate was issued today. Enclosed with the mandate is a certified copy of our

cost bill showing charges and payments as reflected by the record for your use in settlement

between the parties.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

cc: Ms. Tracy Nicole Leroy (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Warren W. Harris (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Roger D. Townsend (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Vincent L. Marable III (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. William V. Dorsaneo III (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Charles Imlay Appler

FILE COPY
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Post Office Box 12248

Austin, Texas 78711

(512) 463-1312

Mr. Thomas R. Phillips (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. David M. Gunn (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. William Fred Hagans (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Hugh Rice Kelly (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Chris Daniel (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. George S. Christian (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Joseph M. Nixon (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

FILE COPY
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1175 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1175

     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
  Facilities Act to increase the ceiling on the Federal share of the 
   costs of phase I of the Orange County, California, Regional Water 
                          Reclamation Project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2007

 Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California (for herself, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Gary 
 G. Miller of California, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Royce, and Mr. Campbell 
of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
  Facilities Act to increase the ceiling on the Federal share of the 
   costs of phase I of the Orange County, California, Regional Water 
                          Reclamation Project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CEILING INCREASE ON FEDERAL SHARE OF WATER RECLAMATION 
              PROJECT.

    Section 1631(d) of the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study 
and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h-13(d)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ``paragraph (2)'' and 
        inserting ``paragraphs (2) and (3)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) The Federal share of the costs of the project 
        authorized by section 1624 shall not exceed the following:
                    ``(A) $22,000,000 for fiscal year 2007.
                    ``(B) $24,200,000 for fiscal year 2008.
                    ``(C) $26,620,000 for fiscal year 2009.
                    ``(D) $29,282,000 for fiscal year 2010.
                    ``(E) $32,210,200 for fiscal year 2011.
                    ``(F) $35,431,220 for fiscal year 2012.
                    ``(G) $38,974,342 for fiscal year 2013.
                    ``(H) $42,871,776 for fiscal year 2014.
                    ``(I) $47,158,953 for fiscal year 2015.
                    ``(J) $51,874,849 for fiscal year 2016.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT BOBBY STANCIL.

March 13, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.