alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1126 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 379
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1126

                          [Report No. 110-181]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2007

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           September 17, 2007

              Reported by Mr. Bingaman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To reauthorize the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and 
                Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 9 of the Steel and 
Aluminum Energy Conservation and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988 
(15 U.S.C. 5108) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 9. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry 
out this Act $12,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2008 through 
2012.''.
    (b) Steel Project Priorities.--Section 4(c)(1) of the Steel and 
Aluminum Energy Conservation and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988 
(15 U.S.C. 5103(c)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (H), by striking ``coatings for sheet 
        steels'' and inserting ``sheet and bar steels''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(K) The development of technologies which reduce 
                greenhouse gas emissions.''.
    (c) Conforming Amendments.--The Steel and Aluminum Energy 
Conservation and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988 is further 
amended--
            (1) by striking section 7 (15 U.S.C. 5106); and
            (2) in section 8 (15 U.S.C. 5107), by inserting ``, 
        beginning with fiscal year 2008,'' after ``close of each fiscal 
        year''.
                                                       Calendar No. 379

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1126

                          [Report No. 110-181]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To reauthorize the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and 
                Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 17, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# DAF welcomes industry partners to HQ development program 

              - Published  Jan. 25, 2024
              - Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs

**ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --  **

Since September 2023, the Department of the Air Force has gained unique strategic insights from an employee who is not traditionally one of its own.  

Through the Public-Private Talent Exchange, Jamal Mahboob, a Google Cloud Platform Customer Engineer at Google Public Sector, has been participating in a professional development program with the DAF Chief Technology Officer, serving as a subject matter expert and technical advisor.  

“I’ve enjoyed every minute of providing my technical expertise to help bridge the gap between industry and the Department of the Air Force,” Mahboob said. “My time at the Office of the Chief Information Officer gave me a better understanding of the DAF and its needs, and I think opportunities like this truly showcase what public-private partnerships are really about.”   

The PPTE is a competitive, acquisition-focused professional development program designed to grow partnership opportunities and increase communication between government and industry. The PPTE affords Department of Defense and industry professionals an opportunity to gain exposure and experience in operations, business culture, and challenges and the opportunity to share innovative best practices.  

“This ground-breaking program underscores our unwavering commitment to enhancing the partnership between military and industry, ensuring mutual growth, learning, and innovation,” said Mark Tedrow, Force Modernization Career Field manager. “The PPTE marks a significant step in promoting a more dynamic synergy between the DAF and our industry leaders, thus building a more open culture of mutual learning, innovation, and continuous improvement.” 

Supporting collaboration with industry for the past 76 years, the Secretary of the Air Force acquisition force development has executed the **Education With Industry Program**, in which approximately 80 officer, enlisted, and civilian DAF personnel work with select industry partners for a 10-month immersion. The DAF has recognized tremendous value from these personnel, who then bring hands-on industry experience, knowledge, and perspective back to the DAF.  

“The PPTE further solidifies the DAF’s position at the forefront of innovation, allowing industry leaders to share cutting-edge practices and technologies that complement the military’s expertise, accelerating the development and deployment of advanced solutions, ultimately enhancing and strengthening our National Security,” said Tedrow.    

More information about the DOD’s PPTE program can be found **here**. Organizations and companies interested in learning more should contact SAF/AQH at **SAF.AQ.SAF-AQH.Workflow@us.af.mil**. 

PPTEgooglecloudinnovationprofessional developmentindustrypartnershipEducation with Industrylearning
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the quarterly report of Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Larry K. Hinson, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Larrry K. Hinson
-------------------------------------
Larry K. Hinson,
Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer
June 30, 2004


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. and will be retained by
Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 41680 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
EMMANUEL OLUBUKOLA ABIONA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:16

- CR

- 519

- 1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Emmanuel Olubukola Abiona has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Abiona h a s not filed a res ponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 18, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-41680 Document: 00514122596 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017No. 16

- 41680

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdr aw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-41680 Document: 00514122596 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
758 A.2d 657

#### In the Matter of Leon G. KRASINSKI. Petition for Reinstatement from Inactive Status.

No. 44 DB 2000.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Aug. 18, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2000, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated July 17, 2000, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that LEON G. KRASINSKI, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.
583 A.2d 312

#### THOMAS BLAZOVIC v. JAMES CORIS, JR., ETC.

January 23, 1990.

Petition for certification granted.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determine d that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30739 Summary Calendar

ERIC C. HAHN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Robert E. Rubin, Secretary, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(93-CV-3820-M)
January 17, 1997 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Eric Hahn appeals the dismissal of his employmen t discrimination suit. We affirm substantially for the reasons given by the magistrate judge and the district court. Hahn’s claims for failure to promote are time-barred because they were filed a full 214 days after the EEOC’s Office of Federal Operations issued its2

ruling on those claims. Each of his remaining claims fails because it was not administratively exhausted, because it does not amount to an adverse personnel action, or because it does not constitute an objectively hostile or abusive work environment as a matter of law.
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350

         In connection with the filing with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission of National Diversified Services, Inc.'s (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 31, 2005 (the
"Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify that (i) in its capacity as an officer of
the Company, (ii) to his actual knowledge, and (iii) solely for the purpose of
compliance with 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

         The above certification is given as of the date of the Report and is
limited to the periods covered by the Report.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate on
August 19, 2005.




                                           /s/ Dominic Certo
                                           ------------------
                                           Dominic Certo
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           and Chief Financial Officer
News United States Air Force
 AF leaders gather to talk professionalismPublished Dec. 11, 2015
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Beth Anschutz
                        
                        
                        Air Education and Training Command Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANOTNIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                Air Force leaders discussed the future of professionalism in the total force and how to forge better Airmen during a summit here Dec. 2-3.
Nearly 80 leaders from all major commands joined stakeholders from Headquarters Air force, Air University, U.S. Air Force Academy, and the Air Force Guard and Reserve to pool resources and learn what the Profession of Arms Center of Excellence has to offer. This is the second professionalism summit hosted by PACE, the Air Force’s newly minted office dedicated to developing Airmen with a sense of what it means to be a true professional.
“Foremost, the purpose of PACE's professionalism summit is to ensure all MAJCOMs have a common understanding of what the Air Force is doing to further Airmen’s professional development. We aim to let all stakeholders, across the Air Force, know it's time for a new day in how we're building our Airmen,” said Daniel Woolever, PACE’s program management division chief. “Additionally, the summit is a springboard to build a network of professional development partners across the Air Force.”
According to Thomas Norling, a PACE program analyst who coordinated this year’s event, “Colleagues from across the Air Force collaborated for two days talking about our culture, building a better Airman, and infusing our core values into the profession of arms in new and exciting ways.”
Participants were offered talks on current PACE enterprises and the office’s proactive approach to building a more professional, core value-centered environment. The group was also encouraged to share their own ideas and plans. Discussion included best practices, new strategies and stretched outside the borders of the active-duty force.
“One aspect of the summit that I found extremely refreshing was the significant discussion on enhancing our civilian professional development opportunities,” Norling said. “Our Air Force has a vast population of seasoned civilian professionals who truly are Airmen.”
The PACE organization plans to keep hosting the professionalism summit, with another event planned next year. For more information on PACE and its current initiatives, visit www.airman.af.mil.PACE 



professionalism 



leaders 



total force 



summit
### NUMBER 13 - 14 - 00 533 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS , RICHARD FREYMANN ,

AND AARON AQUILES GALVAN

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam 1
Relator s , State Farm Lloyds , Richard Freymann, and Aaron Aquiles Galvan, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court direct respondent, the Honorable Rose Guerra Reyna, Presiding Judge of the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, to withdraw her order denying relators ’ verified plea in abatement and to enter an order abating the suit for damages brought agai nst relator s by the real part ies in
i nterest, Eustorgio Farias and Maria Farias, u ntil sixty days after they provide relator s with

1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(d) ( “ When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. ” ); T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).2

a notice letter for t he i r claim stating the specific, separate amounts for the claimed damages and attorney’s fees. See T EX

. I NS

. C ODE A NN . § 541.154 (West, West law through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Prior Notice of Action”); id. § 541.155 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Abatement”); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.1 (“Commencement” of Original Proceedings). In addition, relator s request that this Court issue immediate temporary relief staying respondent’s order denying the plea in abatement. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.10 (“Temporary Relief”).
T he Court, having examined and fully considered th e petition for writ of mandamus and the applicable law, is of the opinion that th e petition for writ of mandamus should be denied for the reasons expressed in our opinion in In re State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freymann, and Nathan Burris , No . 13

- 14

- 00347

- CV, 2014 WL 4243701 , at ** 4

– 9 (Tex. App.

— Co rpus Christi Aug. 27, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op ). Accordingly, the Court DENIES the petit ion for writ of mandamus and request for immediate temporary relief

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.8( d ).

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 2 3r d day of September, 2014.
II 

Calendar No. 764 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1019 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

JUNE 4, 2008 

Reported by Mrs. BOXER, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States customhouse building located 

at 31 Gonzalez Clemente Avenue in Mayagu ̈ez, Puerto 

Rico, as the ‘‘Rafael Martı ́nez Nadal United States Customhouse Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States customhouse building located at 

5 31 Gonzalez Clemente Avenue in Mayagu ̈ez, Puerto Rico, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Rafael Martı ́nez 

7 Nadal United States Customhouse Building’’. 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1019 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

4 States customhouse building referred to in section 1 shall 

5 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Rafael Martı ́nez Nadal 

6 United States Customhouse Building’’. 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Calendar No. 764 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1019 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States customhouse buildMayagu ing located at 31 Gonzalez Clemente Avenue in 

 ̈ez, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Rafael Martı ́nez 

Nadal United States Customhouse Building’’. 

JUNE 4, 2008 

Reported without amendment 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
|   | 1. | I am a duly authorized officer of BMW Financial Services NA, LLC; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | I have reviewed the terms of that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2011 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as Seller, Servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), Administrator and Custodian, Citibank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee, BMW FS Securities LLC, as Depositor, and BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2011-A, as Issuer and I have made, or have caused to be made under my supervision, a detailed review of the activities of the Servicer and the performance of its obligations thereunder during the period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects during the period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014, except as set forth below. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### A. H. Morgan v. Chas. Vandermark.

(No. —, Op. Book No. 1, p. 242.)

Appeal from Nacogdoches County.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§511. *Alteration of instrument of writing; rules relating to.*Appellee sued appellant upon two notes, which were made payable to one Lowe. After appellant had executed and delivered the notes to Lowe, the latter, without the knowledge of appellant, signed his name thereto as security, and also indorsed the notes by writing his name on the back thereof. It-was objected by appellant that Lowe’s signatures to the notes as security were such alterations of the instruments as rendered them void as to appellant. *Held:*It is a general rule that an instrument which has been fraudulently altered in a material part is thereby rendered void, and will not support an action. [Park v. Glover, 23 Tex. 472.] It has also been held that the addition by the payee or holder, of the name of a person as a joint and several maker of the note, after it has been completed, issued and negotiated, without the consent of the original maker, discharges the original maker from liability on the note. [Harper v. Stroud, 41 Tex. 367.] But in this case, the signature of Lowe as security on the face of the notes, he being the payee of the notes, did not alter or change the legal im*254port of the notes. It had. the legal effect to bind Lowe as an indorser, and was evidently made with that purpose, and not for any fraudulent purpose. It would present a different question if some other name besides that of Lowe had been signed to the note without the consent of the maker.

October 24, 1877.

§ 512. *Consideration; plea of failure of, held insufficient.*Appellant pleaded that the notes sued upon were given in consideration of a certain patent right purchased by him of Lowe; that the patent was wholly worthless; that in the sale of it to him Lowe had practiced a fraud upon him; that the notes were transferred to appellant after maturity; that Lowe and appellant well knew that the patent was worthless, etc. *Held,*that under these allegations appellant was not entitled to introduce evidence to prove that the patent was worthless, or to prove that fraud had been practiced upon him in the sale of it to him. He should have averred the facts which constituted the fraud, and that he was induced thereby to make the purchase, and that the worthlessness of the patent was unknown to him when he bought it.

Affirmed.
No. D-697.

#### In re Disbarment of Reddan.

It is ordered that John D. Reddan, of West Hempstead, N. Y., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.