Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-Q/A
Amendment No. 1

ý

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2010oro

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the transition period
from                                to


Commission file number 0-27628



SUPERGEN, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

91-1841574(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)

(IRS Employer
Identification Number)4140 Dublin Blvd, Suite 200, Dublin, California

94568(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)


(925) 560 - 0100(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Not applicable(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)



Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ý    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and
post such files). Yes o    No o

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.
See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer "and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer ý

Non-accelerated filer o (do not check if a
smaller reporting company)

Smaller Reporting Company o


Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o    No ý

The number of shares of the registrant's Common Stock, $.001 par value, outstanding as of August 2, 2010 was 60,308,517.



---



Table of Contents

EXPLANATORY NOTE

The sole purpose of this amendment to SuperGen, Inc.'s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010
is to include dates on the management certifications made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, attached as Exhibit 32.1 to this amended report.

No
other changes have been made to the Form 10-Q. This amendment speaks as of the original filing date of the 10-Q, does not reflect events that may have occurred subsequent to
the original filing date, and does not modify or update in any way disclosures made in the Form 10-Q.

TABLE OF CONTENTS



Page
No.PART I    FINANCIAL INFORMATIONItem 1Financial Statements (Unaudited)Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009

3Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010
and 2009

4Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and
2009

5Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

6Item 2Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations

16Item 3Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

24Item 4Controls and Procedures

24PART II OTHER INFORMATIONItem 1ARisk Factors

25Item 6Exhibits

37SIGNATURES

38


2

---





Table of Contents



SUPERGEN, INC.        CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS        (In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

June 30,
2010

December 31,
2009(Unaudited)ASSETSCurrent assets:Cash and cash equivalents

$
16,614

$
7,682Marketable securities


85,952


89,515Income tax receivable


893


904Prepaid expenses and other current assets


1,405


1,150Total current assets


104,864


99,251Marketable securities, non-current


3,903


3,570Property, plant and equipment, net


3,957


4,205Goodwill


731


731Restricted cash


2,129


2,255Other assets


505


505Total assets

$
116,089

$
110,517LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYCurrent liabilities:Accounts payable

$
1,449

$
2,011Accrued liabilities


200


234Payable to AVI BioPharma


565


565Deferred gain on sale of products to Hospira, Inc.


50


50Deferred revenue


509


509Deferred rent


162


343Accrued payroll and employee benefits


2,473


2,861Total current liabilities


5,408


6,573Deferred rent, non-current


14


19Deferred revenue, non-current


1,684


1,939Total liabilities


7,106


8,531Commitments and contingenciesStockholders' equity:Preferred stock, $.001 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; none outstanding





Common stock, $.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 60,308,517 and 60,198,707 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively


60


60Additional paid in capital


458,674


457,714Accumulated other comprehensive gain


1,199


797Accumulated deficit


(350,950
)

(356,585
)Total stockholders' equity


108,983


101,986Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$
116,089

$
110,517


See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3

---





Table of Contents



SUPERGEN, INC.        CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS        (In thousands, except per share amounts)        (Unaudited)

Three months ended
June 30,

Six months ended
June 30,2010

2009

2010

2009Revenues:Royalty revenue

$
9,764

$
6,011

$
24,057

$
18,925Development and license revenue


127





254


Total revenues


9,891


6,011


24,311


18,925Operating expenses:Research and development


7,269


6,756


14,705


14,091General and administrative


2,407


1,984


4,768


4,209Gain on sale of products


(700
)




(700
)

(500
)Total operating expenses


8,976


8,740


18,773


17,800Income (loss) from operations


915


(2,729
)

5,538


1,125Interest income


46


187


97


458Income (loss) before income tax benefit (provision)


961


(2,542
)

5,635


1,583Income tax benefit (provision)





115





(15
)Net income (loss)

$
961

$
(2,427
)
$
5,635

$
1,568Net income (loss) per common share:Basic

$
0.02

$
(0.04
)
$
0.09

$
0.03Diluted

$
0.02

$
(0.04
)
$
0.09

$
0.03Weighted average shares outstanding:Basic


60,293


59,106


60,251


59,095Diluted


60,770


59,106


60,752


59,102


See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

4

---





Table of Contents



SUPERGEN, INC.        CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS        (In thousands)        (Unaudited)

Six months ended
June 30,2010

2009Operating activities:Net income

$
5,635

$
1,568Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:Depreciation


620


616Amortization of intangibles





106Stock-based compensation expense


735


1,104Recognition of gain on sale of products


(700
)

(500
)Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Income tax receivable


11


Prepaid expenses and other assets


(255
)

(101
)Restricted cash


126


99Accounts payable and other liabilities


(1,170
)

(1,879
)Deferred revenue


(255
)

Net cash provided by operating activities


4,747


1,013Investing activities:Purchases of marketable securities


(71,243
)

(46,095
)Maturities of marketable securities


74,875


19,534Purchases of property and equipment


(372
)

(831
)Proceeds from sale of products


700


500Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities


3,960


(26,892
)Financing activities:Proceeds from issuance of common stock


225


59Net cash provided by financing activities


225


59Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents


8,932


(25,820
)Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period


7,682


48,908Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$
16,614

$
23,088


See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

5

---





Table of Contents



SUPERGEN, INC.        NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS        JUNE 30, 2010        (Unaudited)

NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of SuperGen, Inc. ("we," "SuperGen" or the "Company") have been prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30,
2010 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.

The
balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all the information and footnotes required by
generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.

NOTE 2. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock Option Plans.We have authorized 18,263,000 shares of common stock for issuance following the grant of incentive stock options or
nonstatutory
stock options to employees, directors, and consultants under our stock option plans. The number of shares to be purchased, their price, and the terms of payment are determined by our Board of
Directors, provided that the exercise price for incentive stock options cannot be less than the fair market value on the date of grant. The options granted generally expire ten years after the date of
grant and become exercisable at such times and under such conditions as determined by the Board of Directors (generally over a four or five year period). Options that have performance-based vesting
criteria become exercisable in accordance with the milestones determined by the Board of Directors.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan.We also have an employee stock purchase plan ("ESPP") that allows eligible employees to purchase common
stock at a
price per share equal to 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock at the beginning or end of each six month period during the term of the ESPP. The current offering period began
May 15, 2010 and is scheduled to end on November 14, 2010.

We
recognized $488,000 and $505,000, respectively, in stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. We recognized $735,000 and $1,104,000,
respectively, in stock-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. These amounts have been recorded in research and development expenses or general and
administrative expenses, based on the home department of our employees.

6

---



Table of Contents

SUPERGEN, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

JUNE 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

NOTE 2. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

The
fair value of each stock award is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the weighted-average assumptions noted in the following table:

Three months ended
June 30,

Six months ended
June 30,2010

2009

2010

2009Risk-free interest rate


3.00
%

2.22
%

3.03
%

2.24
%Dividend yield











Expected volatility


59.45
%

64.68
%

59.57
%

66.07
%Expected life (in years)


5.87


5.85


5.95


5.82


We
compute expected volatility using a blend of historical volatility and implied volatility of our common stock based on the period of time corresponding to the expected life of the
stock options. We do not rely exclusively on implied volatility because options on SuperGen stock with remaining terms of greater than one year are not regularly traded in the market. The expected
life of stock options granted is based exclusively on historical data and represents the weighted average period of time that stock
options granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected life is applied to one group as a whole as we do not expect substantially different exercise or post-vesting termination
behavior among our employee and director population. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant commensurate with the expected
life assumption. The dividend yield is zero as we do not expect to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. We currently estimate when and if performance-based options will be earned. If the
awards are not considered probable of achievement, no amount of stock-based compensation is recognized. If we consider the award to be probable of vesting, expense is recorded over the estimated
service period.

We
are using the straight-line attribution method to recognize stock-based compensation expense. The amount of stock-based compensation recognized during a period is based on
the value of the portion of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest. We estimate forfeiture rates at the time of grant and revise them, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. We used estimated forfeiture rates of 8.60% and 6.91% for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The term "forfeitures" is
distinct from "cancellations" or "expirations" and represents only the unvested portion of a surrendered option. The forfeiture rate is re-evaluated annually and is adjusted as necessary.
Ultimately, the actual expense recognized over the vesting period will only be for those shares that vest.

7

---



Table of Contents

SUPERGEN, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

JUNE 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

NOTE 2. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

A
summary of the Company's stock options as of June 30, 2010 and activity during the six months then ended is presented below:

Options
Outstanding

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term

Aggregate
Intrinsic
ValueBalance at January 1, 2010


9,369,905

$
5.66Granted


1,502,630


3.22Exercised


(80,625
)

1.95Forfeited


(32,896
)

2.03Expired


(242,588
)

24.62Balance at June 30, 2010


10,516,426

$
4.91


6.44

$
372,862Vested or expected to vest at June 30, 2010


9,976,942

$
4.89


6.33

$
352,248Exercisable at June 30, 2010


6,617,651

$
5.29


5.54

$
152,503


The
weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $1.85. The total intrinsic value of options exercised
(i.e. the difference between the market price at exercise and the price paid to exercise the options) during the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $100,000 and the total amount of cash
received from exercise of these options was $158,000.

As
of June 30, 2010, there was $3,626,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock-based awards that are probable of vesting. This expense is expected
to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.35 years.

NOTE 3. CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES

Cash and cash equivalents include bank demand deposits, certificates of deposit, investments in debt securities with maturities of three months or less when purchased, and an interest in
money market funds which invest primarily in U.S. government obligations. Investments in marketable securities consist of equity securities and corporate or government debt securities that have a
readily ascertainable market value and are readily marketable. We report these investments at fair value. We designate all cash equivalents and marketable securities as
available-for-sale, with unrealized gains and losses included as a component of equity.

8

---



Table of Contents

SUPERGEN, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

JUNE 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3. CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES (Continued)

The
following is a summary of available-for-sale securities (in thousands):

Amortized
Cost

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

Fair ValueAt June 30, 2010Money market funds

$
1,008

$


$


$
1,008U.S. corporate debt securities


16,398








16,398Debt securities issued by U.S. government and U.S. government agencies


80,931


22





80,953Marketable equity securities


2,726


1,177





3,903Total

$
101,063

$
1,199

$


$
102,262At December 31, 2009Money market funds

$
4,713

$


$


$
4,713U.S. corporate debt securities


29,987





(1
)

29,986Debt securities issued by U.S. government and U.S. government agencies


59,575


12


(58
)

59,529Marketable equity securities


2,726


844





3,570Total

$
97,001

$
856

$
(59
)
$
97,798


The
available-for-sale securities are classified on the balance sheet as follows (in thousands):

Fair ValueJune 30,
2010

December 31,
2009Amounts included in cash and cash equivalents

$
12,407

$
4,713Marketable securities, current


85,952


89,515Marketable securities, non-current


3,903


3,570Total

$
102,262

$
97,798


At
June 30, 2010, we held $98,359,000 of debt securities, all of which were due in one year or less based on their contractual maturities.

In
the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, realized gains and losses calculated using the specific identification method were immaterial.

We
evaluate investments with unrealized losses to determine if the losses are other than temporary. In making this determination, we consider the financial condition and
near-term prospects of the issuers, the magnitude of the losses compared to the investments' amortized cost, the length of time the investments have been in an unrealized loss position,
and our ability and intent to hold the investments for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a recovery of fair value.

9

---



Table of Contents

SUPERGEN, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

JUNE 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3. CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES (Continued)

Equity Investments

Equity investments in securities without readily determinable fair value, which consist of investments in privately held companies, are
carried at cost. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we held one such non-marketable security with a carrying amount of $500,000. This investment is included in other
assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. We periodically review this investment and evaluate whether an impairment has occurred. We monitor the liquidity and financing activities of the
issuer of this security and evaluate, among other factors, the financial condition of and business outlook of the issuer, including key operational and cash flow metrics and current market conditions,
as well as our intent and ability to retain the investment. We believe this equity investment continues to be realizable.

NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the
asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The following three levels of inputs may be used to measure fair value under the fair value
hierarchy:



If
the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one of the different levels described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level
input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

As
of June 30, 2010, we held $102,262,000 of cash equivalents and marketable securities consisting of equity securities, high quality marketable debt instruments of the U.S.
government and U.S. government agencies, commercial paper, and a money market fund. We have adopted an investment policy and established guidelines relating to credit quality, diversification and
maturities of our investments to preserve principal and maintain liquidity. All investment securities are issued by or guaranteed by the U.S. government and its federal agencies or have a credit
rating of at least long-term of A or short-term of A1/P1 as determined by Moody's Investors Service and/or Standard & Poor's. We do not have any direct investments in
auction-rate securities or securities that are collateralized by assets that include mortgages or subprime debt.

10

---



Table of Contents

SUPERGEN, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

JUNE 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

The
fair value measurements of our cash equivalents and available-for-sale marketable securities are identified at the following levels within the fair value
hierarchy (in thousands):

Fair Value Measurements UsingQuoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

TotalAt June 30, 2010Money market funds

$


$
1,008




$
1,008Commercial paper





16,398





16,398U.S. government and U.S government agency notes





80,953





80,953Equity securities


3,903








3,903$
3,903

$
98,359




$
102,262At December 31, 2009Money market funds

$


$
4,713




$
4,713Commercial paper





29,986





29,986U.S. government and U.S. government agency notes





59,529





59,529Equity securities


3,570








3,570$
3,570

$
94,228




$
97,798


NOTE 5. LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH MGI PHARMA, INC./EISAI CORPORATION

In August 2004, we entered into a license agreement with MGI PHARMA, Inc., a Minnesota corporation ("MGI") relating to Dacogen® (decitabine) for Injection, an
anti-cancer therapeutic. Pursuant to the terms of the license agreement, MGI received exclusive worldwide rights to the development, commercialization and distribution of Dacogen for all
indications. We are entitled to royalties from MGI on all sales of licensed product worldwide.

In
May 2006, the United States Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") approved Dacogen for the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes ("MDS") and MGI commenced commercial
sales of Dacogen in the United States. In July 2006, MGI executed an agreement to sublicense Dacogen to Janssen-Cilag, a Johnson & Johnson company, granting exclusive development and
commercialization rights in all territories outside North America. MGI was acquired by Eisai Corporation of North America ("Eisai") in January 2008.

MGI/Eisai
is required to pay us royalties starting at 20% and escalating to a maximum of 30% of net worldwide Dacogen sales within 45 days after the end of each calendar quarter.
We recognize royalty revenue when we receive the royalty statement from Eisai because we do not have sufficient ability to accurately estimate Dacogen sales prior to that time. During the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we recorded royalty revenue of $9,764,000 and $6,011,000, respectively. During the six

11

---



Table of Contents

SUPERGEN, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

JUNE 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

NOTE 5. LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH MGI PHARMA, INC./EISAI CORPORATION (Continued)

months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we recorded royalty revenue of $24,057,000 and $18,925,000, respectively.

NOTE 6. ACQUISITION OF MONTIGEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

In April 2006, we acquired Montigen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Montigen"), a privately-held oncology-focused drug discovery and development company headquartered in Salt
Lake City, Utah. Montigen's assets included its research and development team, a proprietary drug discovery technology platform and optimization process known as CLIMB®, and
late-stage pre-clinical compounds.

In
addition to the consideration paid at the closing of the transaction, the merger agreement required us to pay the former Montigen stockholders $22 million in shares of our
common stock, contingent upon achievement of specific regulatory milestones. We paid the first contingent milestone payment of $10 million in April 2007 and the second contingent milestone
payment of $5.2 million in November 2008. These milestone payments were recorded as acquired in-process research and development expense. The remaining $6.8 million future
contingent regulatory milestone payment that may become payable to the former Montigen stockholders will also be recorded as additional acquired in-process research and development expense
when and if the related milestone is achieved.

NOTE 7. ASSET ACQUISITION AGREEMENTS WITH MAYNE PHARMA/HOSPIRA

In August 2006, we closed a transaction with Mayne Pharma (USA), Inc. ("Mayne"), pursuant to which Mayne acquired the North American rights to Nipent® and our
SurfaceSafe® cleaning system. Mayne was acquired by Hospira, Inc. in February 2007. In April 2007, we closed another transaction with Mayne/Hospira completing the sale of the
remaining worldwide rights for Nipent for total consideration of up to $8.3 million. From the sale of the remaining worldwide rights we received an initial up-front payment of
$3.75 million, and the balance of the purchase price was guaranteed and payable in five installments over a five year period on the anniversary dates of the closing date.

Due
to the Company's determination that the Nipent operations sold to Mayne/Hospira did not represent a separate component of the Company and the Company's continuing involvement with
the Nipent operations, resulting from entering into related agreements and the related additional obligations, the Company has reflected activities related to the Nipent and SurfaceSafe businesses in
operating activities for all periods presented.

Under
the agreements with Mayne/Hospira, we are obligated to reimburse Mayne/Hospira for three years for amounts paid to a new supplier of Nipent in excess of the amounts referenced in
the supply agreement. Mayne/Hospira has negotiated a manufacturing supply agreement with an FDA approved manufacturing site, and based on historical sales trends and manufacturing yields and forecasts
of future sales and manufacturing yields, we have estimated our price protection exposure over the remaining six month period to be $50,000, although no maximum amount is specified in the agreement.
This amount comprises the deferred gain in the accompanying balance sheet at June 30, 2010. Payments will be made to Mayne/Hospira when qualified claims are submitted and the amounts become
due.

12

---



Table of Contents

SUPERGEN, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

JUNE 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

NOTE 7. ASSET ACQUISITION AGREEMENTS WITH MAYNE PHARMA/HOSPIRA (Continued)

During
the six months ended June 30, 2010 we received $700,000 and during the six months ended June 30, 2009 we received $500,000, representing the second and third
installment payments from Mayne/Hospira related to the sale of the remaining worldwide Nipent rights. These amounts were recorded as gain on sale of products.

NOTE 8. AGREEMENTS WITH GLAXOSMITHKLINE

In October 2009, we entered into agreements with GlaxoSmithKline ("GSK") under which we will collaborate with GSK over a period of five years to discover and develop specific epigenetic
therapeutics.

The
total deferred revenue related to GSK of $2,545,000 is being recognized ratably over five years, the expected term of our substantive performance obligations under the License
Agreement. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized $127,000 and $254,000, respectively, of the deferred revenue as development and license revenue. We had no similar
revenue in 2009.

NOTE 9. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/LOSS

The following table is a reconciliation of our net income to comprehensive income (in thousands):

Three months ended
June 30,

Six months ended
June 30,2010

2009

2010

2009Net income (loss)

$
961

$
(2,427
)
$
5,635

$
1,568Other comprehensive gain (loss)Change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments


1,049


2,228


402


2,078Comprehensive income (loss)

$
2,010

$
(199
)
$
6,037

$
3,646


NOTE 10. BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE

Basic net income per share is calculated by dividing the net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, without consideration of potential common
shares. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing the net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period and dilutive potential common shares for the
period determined using the treasury-stock method. For purposes of this calculation, options to purchase stock and warrants are considered to be potential common shares and are only included in the
calculation of diluted net income per share when their effect is dilutive.

13

---



Table of Contents

SUPERGEN, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

JUNE 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

NOTE 10. BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE (Continued)

The
following table is a reconciliation of the denominator used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands):

Three months ended
June 30,

Six months ended
June 30,2010

2009

2010

2009Weighted-average common shares outstanding used in calculation of basic earnings per share


60,293


59,106


60,251


59,095Dilutive stock options


477





501


7Weighted-average common shares outstanding used in calculation of diluted earnings per share


60,770


59,106


60,752


59,102Weighted-average outstanding stock options not included in diluted net income per share calculation as they had an antidilutive effect


8,235


9,827


7,583


9,225


NOTE 11. INCOME TAXES

We recorded no provision for income taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. We recorded a tax benefit of $115,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009
and a tax provision of $15,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. In all periods, the provisions or benefits were based on the Company's estimated effective tax rate for the year, taking
into account the available net operating loss carryforwards and estimated refundable research and development tax credits.

We
have no unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2010. We do not anticipate that our total unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change prior to June 30, 2011.

Our
policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to income taxes as a component of income tax expense and there have been no such interest and penalties recorded for any of the
periods presented. We are subject to income tax examinations for U.S. federal income taxes and state income taxes from 1994 forward due to net operating losses in tax years 1994 through 2005. We are
subject to tax examinations in the United Kingdom from 2001 forward.

NOTE 12. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, which addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to potentially enable vendors to account for
products or services separately rather than as a combined unit and modifies the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated across the separately identified deliverables. The ASU also
significantly expands the disclosure requirements for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The Company will adopt the ASU as of January 1, 2011 and apply it prospectively to arrangements
entered into or materially modified after the adoption date. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2009-13 to have any effect on its financial statements upon its
required adoption on January 1, 2011.

14

---



Table of Contents

SUPERGEN, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

JUNE 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

NOTE 12. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)

In
March 2010, Accounting Standards Codification Topic 605, Revenue Recognition ("ASC 605") was amended to define a milestone and clarify that the milestone method of revenue recognition
is a valid application of the proportional performance model when applied to research or development arrangements. Accordingly, a company can make an accounting policy election to recognize a payment
that is contingent upon the achievement of a substantive milestone in its entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved. This guidance is effective for the Company as of January 1,
2011 and may be applied on a prospective or retrospective basis. The Company does not expect the adoption to have any effect on its financial statements upon its required adoption on January 1,
2011.

NOTE 13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTAMENDMENT TO CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS LEASE

On August 2, 2010, we executed an amendment to the lease for our corporate headquarters in Dublin, California. The current lease, which is scheduled to expire on
November 30, 2010, calls for base rent payments of approximately $197,000 per month. Under the new lease amendment, which takes effect December 1, 2010 for a five year term with a five
year renewal option, we will reduce the amount of rented square feet and the base monthly rent payments will be $49,500 in the first year. At the end of each year, the rent will increase by $1,500 per
month.

15

---





Table of Contents



Item 2.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion together with our condensed consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this report. The results discussed below are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in any future periods. Our disclosure and analysis in this
section of the report also contain forward-looking statements. When we use the words "anticipate," "estimate," "project," "intend," "expect," "plan," "believe," "should," "likely" and similar
expressions, we are making forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements provide our current expectations or forecasts of future events. In particular, these statements include statements
such as: our estimates about profitability; the percentage of royalties we expect to earn on Dacogen sales under our agreement with MGI/Eisai; our forecasts regarding our research and development
expenses; our expectations about the joint development program with GSK; and our statements regarding the sufficiency of our cash to meet our operating needs. Our actual results could differ
materially from those predicted in the forward-looking statements as a result of risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to: the commercial success of Dacogen; delays and risks associated
with conducting and managing our clinical trials; developing products and obtaining regulatory approval; ability to establish and maintain collaborative relationships; competition; ability to obtain
funding; ability to protect our intellectual property; our
dependence on third party suppliers; risks associated with the hiring and loss of key personnel; adverse changes in the specific markets for our products; and our ability to launch and commercialize
products. Certain unknown or immaterial risks and uncertainties can also affect our forward-looking statements. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed and you should not rely on
these forward-looking statements. For a discussion of the known and material risks that could affect our actual results, please see the "Risk Factors" section of this report. We undertake no
obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Readers should carefully review the Risk Factors section as well as other
reports or documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Overview

We are a pharmaceutical company dedicated to the discovery and development of novel cancer therapeutics in epigenetic and cell
signaling modulation. We develop products through biochemical and clinical proof of concept to partner for further development and commercialization. We have a number of Aurora-A and
Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors and DNA methyltransferase clinical and pre-clinical products under development. In 2006, Dacogen received approval for marketing in the United States, during
2006 and 2007 we sold the North American and remaining worldwide rights to Nipent to Mayne Pharma, in 2006 we acquired a drug discovery and development company to complement our ongoing licensing
efforts, and in October 2009 we entered into a multi-year collaboration with GlaxoSmithKline to discover and develop cancer therapeutics based on epigenetic targets. These transactions
were undertaken to mitigate the ongoing risk of competitive in-licensing and to maximize the return on both existing resources and our incoming royalty and potential milestone revenue.

Since
our incorporation in 1991 we have devoted substantially all of our resources to product development. Our past development efforts have been focused primarily on the key compounds
of Dacogen and Nipent.

Dacogen.Dacogen is approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with MDS. In September 2004, we executed an agreement granting
MGI/Eisai
exclusive worldwide rights to the development, manufacture, commercialization and distribution of Dacogen. Under the terms of the agreement, MGI/Eisai made a $40 million equity investment in
our company and agreed to pay up to $45 million in specific regulatory and commercialization milestone payments. To date, we have received $32.5 million of these milestone payments.

In
accordance with our agreement with MGI/Eisai, we are entitled to receive a royalty on worldwide net sales starting at 20% and escalating to a maximum of 30%. We recognize royalty

16

---



Table of Contents

revenue
when the royalty statement is received from MGI/Eisai because we do not have sufficient ability to accurately estimate Dacogen sales prior to that time. We recorded royalty revenues of
$24.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $18.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

In
July 2006, MGI/Eisai executed an agreement to sublicense Dacogen to Janssen-Cilag, a Johnson & Johnson company, granting exclusive development and commercialization rights in
all territories outside North America. In accordance with our agreement with MGI/Eisai, we are entitled to receive 50% of certain payments MGI/Eisai receives as a result of any sublicenses. We
received $5 million, 50% of the $10 million upfront payment MGI/Eisai received, and, as a result of both the original agreement with MGI/Eisai and this sublicense with Janssen-Cilag, we
may receive up to $17.5 million in future milestone payments as they are achieved for Dacogen globally. Janssen-Cilag companies will be responsible for conducting regulatory and commercial
activities related to Dacogen in all territories outside North America, while MGI/Eisai retains all commercialization rights and responsibility for all activities in the United States, Canada and
Mexico.

Nipent.Nipent is approved by the FDA and European regulatory authorities for the treatment of hairy cell leukemia. Nipent was marketed
by us in the
United States until August 2006, and distributed in Europe through March 2007.

In
August 2006, we closed a transaction with Mayne Pharma (USA), Inc., whereby Mayne acquired the North American rights to Nipent and our SurfaceSafe cleaning system. In April
2007, we closed another transaction with Mayne/Hospira, completing the sale of the remaining worldwide rights for Nipent. The balance of the purchase price relating to the sale of the worldwide rights
is payable in five annual installments on the anniversary of the closing date.

Montigen Acquisition.In April 2006, we acquired Montigen, a privately-held oncology-focused drug discovery and development company
headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. Montigen's assets included its research and development team, a proprietary drug discovery technology platform and optimization process known as CLIMB, and
late-stage pre-clinical compounds targeting Aurora-A Kinase and members of the Tyrosine Kinase receptor family.

In
addition to the consideration paid at the closing of the transaction, the merger agreement specified $22 million due to the former Montigen stockholders, payable in shares of
our common stock, contingent upon achievement of specific regulatory milestones. In April 2007, we paid the first contingent milestone payment of $10 million, and in November 2008, we paid the
second contingent milestone payment of $5.2 million, leaving one remaining future contingent regulatory milestone payment of $6.8 million that is payable upon notification by the FDA of
the first filing of a New Drug Application for a product containing as the active ingredient a compound identified using the CLIMB technology.

GSK Collaboration.In October 2009, we entered into a multi-year collaboration with GSK to discover and develop cancer therapeutics
based
on epigenetic targets. Epigenetics refer to the regulation of genes with mechanisms other than changes to the underlying DNA sequence. Epigenetic processes are widely believed to play a central role
in the development and progression of almost all cancers. Pursuant to the terms of the transaction, we will collaborate with GSK over a period of five years to discover and develop specific epigenetic
therapeutics. At the end of the research term, or earlier if GSK elects, GSK may exercise its option to license from us the compounds that are the result of the joint research effort, in order to
continue the development and ultimately commercialize and sell the products worldwide.

In
connection with the transaction, we received $5 million upfront, inclusive of a $3 million purchase by GSK of shares of our common stock, priced at a premium to market.
In addition, GSK is obligated to make certain payments to us if and when the compounds reach specified developmental

17

---



Table of Contents

milestones,
as well as payments to us if and when the compounds that GSK has licensed achieve certain regulatory milestones. The agreement further provides that, if the licensed compounds derived from
the joint research team become products, GSK will pay us sales milestone payments as well as royalties on annual net sales of such products. The royalties will be paid on a
country-by-country and product-by-product basis. Total potential development and sales milestones payable to us could exceed $375 million. In
addition, we may receive tiered royalties into double digit magnitudes, payable on net sales of any resulting products.

All
of our current products are in the development or clinical trial stage and will require substantial additional investments in research and development, clinical trials, regulatory
and sales and marketing activities to commercialize these product candidates. Conducting clinical trials is a lengthy, time-consuming, and expensive process involving inherent
uncertainties and risks, and our studies may be insufficient to demonstrate safety and efficacy to support FDA approval of any of our product candidates.

As
a result of our substantial research and development expenditures and minimal product revenues, we have incurred cumulative losses of $351.0 million through June 30,
2010, and have not consistently generated enough funds through our operations to support our business, although we were profitable for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the six months ended
June 30, 2010 due to our royalty revenues. In general, we would expect to continue to incur operating losses or operate close to break-even over the next few years.

Ultimately,
our ability to become consistently profitable will depend upon a variety of factors, including regulatory approvals of our products, the timing of the introduction and market
acceptance of our products and competing products, MGI/Eisai's success in selling Dacogen, MGI/Eisai's success in filing marketing applications for Dacogen for additional indications in the U.S. and
worldwide, the success of our joint development program with GSK, the launch of new products, our ability to enter into and perform under collaboration agreements, and our ability to control our
ongoing costs and operating expenses. If our drug discovery and research efforts are not successful, or if the results from our clinical trials are not positive, we may not be able to get sufficient
funding to continue our trials or conduct new trials, and we would be forced to scale down or cease our business operations. Moreover, if our products are not approved or commercially accepted we will
remain unprofitable for longer than we currently anticipate. Additionally, we might be forced to substantially scale down our operations or sell certain of our assets, and it is likely the price of
our stock would decline precipitously.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our management discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our condensed consolidated
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and reported disclosures. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including
those related to revenue recognition, goodwill, valuation of investments and stock-based compensation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe
are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Our
significant accounting policies are more fully disclosed in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
However, some of our accounting policies are particularly important to the portrayal of our financial position and results of operations and require the application of significant judgment by our
management. We believe the following

18

---



Table of Contents

critical
accounting policies, among others, affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements.



We account for stock-based compensation at the fair value estimated on the measurement date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model based on assumptions for volatility, risk-free interest rates, expected life of the option, and dividends (if any). Expected volatility is determined based on a blend of historical
volatility and implied volatility of our common stock based on the period of time corresponding to the expected life of the stock options. The expected life of our stock options is based on our
historical data and represents the period of time that stock options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect
at the time of grant commensurate with the expected life assumption.

We
are using the straight-line attribution method to recognize stock-based compensation expense. The amount of stock-based compensation recognized during a period is based on
the value of the portion of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest, including awards that vest based on certain performance criteria. We estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise
them, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The term "forfeitures" is distinct from "cancellations" or "expirations" and represents only the unvested
portion of the surrendered option. This analysis is re-evaluated quarterly and the forfeiture rate is adjusted as necessary. Ultimately, the actual expense recognized over the vesting
period will only be for those shares that vest.

As
of June 30, 2010, there was $3.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock-based awards that are probable of vesting. This cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.35 years.



MGI/Eisai is required to pay us royalties starting at 20% and escalating to a maximum of 30% of net worldwide Dacogen sales within
45 days after the end of each calendar quarter. During the six month period ended June 30, 2010, we recorded royalty revenue of $24.1 million. Because we do not have sufficient
ability to accurately estimate Dacogen sales, we recognize royalty revenue when we receive the royalty statement from MGI/Eisai. In accordance with our license agreement with MGI/Eisai, we are
entitled to receive 50% of any payments MGI/Eisai receives as a result of any sublicenses.

We
received initial cash proceeds from the North American transaction with Mayne Pharma of $13.4 million. From the initial cash proceeds from the agreement, we deferred an amount
for price protection exposure. The remaining balance of the deferred gain on sale of products of $50,000 at June 30, 2010 consists solely of the estimated price protection exposure for the
remaining six month period stipulated in the agreement and is subject to management estimates and assumptions based on all available information.



As of June 30, 2010, we have intangible assets related to goodwill of $731,000. The determination of whether or not this asset
is impaired involves significant judgment. We review goodwill for impairment whenever there is an indicator that the asset may have been impaired as indicated by our market capitalization or otherwise
and at least annually. The ability of a controlling shareholder to benefit from synergies and other intangible assets that arise from control might cause the fair value of a Company as a whole to
exceed its market capitalization. Therefore, the fair value measurement need not be based solely on the quoted market price of an individual share of that security. Thus, consideration of the impact
of a control premium when control is known to exist in measuring the fair value of a reporting unit may be appropriate. In addition, the Company determines its market

19

---



Table of Contents

capitalization
using a point-in-time market price as of the date of its goodwill impairment assessment. Instead, the Company may consider recent trends in its stock price over
a relatively short period. Given occasional stock price volatility, we do not believe that the enterprise market capitalization should be calculated solely based on anomalous stock price fluctuations
on or around the goodwill impairment assessment date. Nonetheless, the Company would not simply ignore, but would consider, a recent decline in market capitalization in this assessment.



Investments in financial instruments are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices, with unrealized gains and losses included
in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in stockholders' equity. Our investment portfolio includes equity securities that could subject us to material equity market risk and corporate and
U.S. government (or U.S. governmental agency) obligations that subject us to varying levels of credit risk. An other than temporary decline in fair value of a financial instrument will be subject to a
write-down resulting in a charge against earnings. The determination of whether a decline in fair value is other than temporary requires significant judgment, and could have a material
impact on our balance sheet and results of operations. Our management reviews the securities within our portfolio for other than temporary declines in value on a regular basis. As of June 30,
2010, the gross unrealized losses on available for sale investments was less than $1,000, and such losses were not attributed to changes in credit risk. The prices of some of our marketable equity
securities are subject to considerable volatility. Currently we own 2,384,211 shares of AVI and recorded an other-than-temporary decline in value of $3.1 million related
to this investment during the year ended December 31, 2008. However, as of June 30, 2010, the gross unrealized gain on our investment in AVI, representing the fair value of the
investment less its adjusted cost basis, was approximately $1.2 million. Decreases in the fair value of our securities may significantly impact our results of operations.

Investments
in equity securities without readily determinable fair value are carried at cost. We periodically review those carried costs, amounting to $500,000 as of June 30, 2010
and evaluate whether an impairment has occurred. The determination of whether an impairment has occurred requires significant judgment, as each investment has unique market and development
opportunities.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, which addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable
arrangements to potentially enable vendors to account for products or services separately rather than as a combined unit and modifies the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated
across the separately identified deliverables. The ASU also significantly expands the disclosure requirements for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The Company will adopt the ASU as of
January 1, 2011 and apply it prospectively to arrangements entered into or materially modified after the adoption date. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU
No. 2009-13 to have any effect on its financial statements upon its required adoption on January 1, 2011.

In
March 2010, Accounting Standards Codification Topic 605, Revenue Recognition ("ASC 605") was amended to define a milestone and clarify that the milestone method of revenue recognition
is a valid
application of the proportional performance model when applied to research or development arrangements. Accordingly, a company can make an accounting policy election to recognize a payment that is
contingent upon the achievement of a substantive milestone in its entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved. This guidance is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2011 and
may be applied on a prospective or retrospective basis. The Company does not expect the adoption to have any effect on its financial statements upon its required adoption on January 1, 2011.

20

---



Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to three months ended June 30, 2009:

Three months ended
June 30,

ChangeRevenues

2010

2009

Dollar

Percent(Dollars in thousands)Royalty revenue

$
9,764

$
6,011

$
3,753


62.4
%Development and license revenue


127





127





The
increase in royalty revenue from 2009 to 2010 is due to higher Dacogen product sales by MGI/Eisai. During 2009, Dacogen product sales had been negatively impacted by a third party
wholesaler adjusting their near-term inventory purchases. MGI/Eisai is required to pay us royalties starting at 20% and escalating to a maximum of 30% of net worldwide Dacogen sales within
45 days after the end of each calendar quarter. Because we do not have sufficient ability to accurately estimate Dacogen sales, we recognize royalty revenue when we receive the royalty
statements from MGI/Eisai. Therefore, royalty revenues recognized in the second quarters of 2010 and 2009 relate to worldwide Dacogen sales for the first quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Development
and license revenue relates to the agreements we entered into with GSK in October 2009. In connection with the agreements, we received an upfront payment of
$2 million, in addition to a $3 million equity investment by GSK at above-market price. As our substantive performance obligations under the agreements are estimated to be completed over
a five year period, the $2 million upfront payment and the premium paid on the $3 million equity investment of $0.5 million are being recognized ratably over 60 months as
development and license revenue.

Three months ended
June 30,

ChangeOperating expenses

2010

2009

Dollar

Percent(Dollars in thousands)Research and development

$
7,269

$
6,756

$
513


7.6
%General and administrative


2,407


1,984


423


21.3Gain on sale of products


(700
)




700





The
increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to higher contracted outside research and development services for our various drug candidates, including
SGI-110, and clinical trial costs related to our Phase I and Phase Ib clinical trials for amuvatinib and SGI-1776.

The
increase in general and administrative expenses relates primarily to higher costs for accounting and tax consultation fees, additional mailing and consulting costs relating to our
annual stockholder meeting and related proxy solicitation, and additional investor relations and business development consulting expenses.

The
gain on sale of products for the second quarter of 2010 related to the receipt of a $700,000 annual payment from Mayne/Hospira relating to the sale of the worldwide rights to Nipent.
The comparable annual payment of $500,000 for 2009 was received and recorded in the first quarter of 2009.

Three months ended
June 30,

ChangeOther income (expense)

2010

2009

Dollar

Percent(Dollars in thousands)Interest income

$
46

$
187

$
(141
)

(75.4
)%Income tax benefit (provision)





115


(115
)

(100.0
)


21

---



Table of Contents

The
decrease in interest income was due primarily to significantly lower interest rates for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.

The
tax benefit (provision) recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were based on the Company's estimated effective tax rate for the year, taking into account
estimated net operating loss carrybacks and refundable research and development tax credits.

Six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to six months ended June 30, 2009:

Six months ended
June 30,

ChangeRevenues

2010

2009

Dollar

Percent(Dollars in thousands)Royalty revenue

$
24,057

$
18,925

$
5,132


27.1
%Development and license revenue


254





254





The
increase in royalty revenue from 2009 to 2010 is due to higher Dacogen product sales by MGI/Eisai. During 2009, Dacogen product sales had been negatively impacted by a third party
wholesaler adjusting their near-term inventory purchases. MGI/Eisai is required to pay us royalties starting at 20% and escalating to a maximum of 30% of net worldwide Dacogen sales within
45 days after the end of each calendar quarter. Because we do not have sufficient ability to accurately estimate Dacogen sales, we recognize royalty revenue when we receive the royalty
statements from MGI/Eisai.

Development
and license revenue relates to the agreements we entered into with GSK in October 2009. In connection with the agreements, we received an upfront payment of
$2 million, in addition to a $3 million equity investment by GSK at above-market price. As our substantive performance obligations under the agreements are estimated to be completed over
a five year period, the $2 million upfront payment and the premium paid on the $3 million equity investment of $0.5 million are being recognized ratably over 60 months as
development and license revenue.

Six months ended
June 30,

ChangeOperating expenses

2010

2009

Dollar

Percent(Dollars in thousands)Research and development

$
14,705

$
14,091

$
614


4.4
%General and administrative


4,768


4,209


559


13.3Gain on sale of products


(700
)

(500
)

200


40.0


The
increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to higher contracted outside research and development services for our various drug candidates, including
SGI-110, and clinical trial costs related to our Phase I and Phase Ib clinical trials for amuvatinib and SGI-1776.

The
increase in general and administrative expenses relates primarily to higher legal costs, accounting and tax consultation fees, additional mailing and consulting costs relating to our
annual stockholder meeting and related proxy solicitation, and additional investor relations and business development consulting expenses.

22

---



Table of Contents

The
gains on sale of products relate to the receipt of contractual annual payments from Mayne/Hospira relating to the sale of the worldwide rights to Nipent.

Six months ended
June 30,

ChangeOther income (expense)

2010

2009

Dollar

Percent(Dollars in thousands)Interest income

$
97

$
458

$
(361
)

(78.8
)%Income tax benefit (provision)





(15
)

(15
)

(100.0
)


The
decrease in interest income was due primarily to significantly lower interest rates for 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.

The
tax provisions recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were based on the Company's estimated effective tax rate for the year, taking into account net
operating loss carrybacks and estimated refundable research and development tax credits.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities totaled $106,469,000 at June 30, 2010 compared to $100,767,000 at
December 31, 2009.

Net
cash provided by operating activities was $4,747,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2010, and consisted primarily of net income of $5,635,000 plus depreciation of $620,000
and stock based compensation of $735,000, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities of $1,170,000 and the deduction of the $700,000 gain on sale of products that
represents an investing activity. Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,013,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009, and consisted primarily of the net income of $1,568,000 plus
depreciation of $616,000 and stock based compensation of $1,104,000, partially offset by a decline in accounts payable and other liabilities of $1,879,000.

Net
cash provided by investing activities was $3,960,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, and consisted primarily of $74,875,000 in proceeds from maturities of marketable
securities, offset in part by $71,243,000 for purchases of marketable securities. Net cash used in investing activities was $26,892,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, and consisted
primarily of $46,095,000 for purchases of marketable securities, partially offset by $19,534,000 in proceeds from maturities of marketable securities.

Net
cash provided by financing activities was $225,000 and $59,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and consisted in both periods of proceeds from the
exercise of stock options.

We
have financed our operations primarily through the issuance of equity and debt securities and the receipt of royalties, payments in connection with collaborative agreements, and the
sale of products. We believe that our current cash, cash equivalents, and short-term marketable securities will satisfy our cash requirements through 2011. However, we may decide, if
necessary, to consider additional financing options, including the selling of additional shares of stock in a public or private offering and/or exploring marketing partnership opportunities for
existing or newly acquired licensed products and development activities.

In
addition to the contractual obligations disclosed in Management's Discussion and Analysis included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009, we have $6.8 million in future contingent regulatory milestone payments due to the former Montigen stockholders, which we are contractually obligated to pay in shares
of our common stock, but may pay partially in cash. Also, on August 2, 2010, we executed an amendment to the lease for our corporate

23

---



Table of Contents

headquarters
in Dublin, California. The current lease, which is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2010, calls for base rent payments of approximately $197,000 per month. Under the new lease
amendment, which takes effect December 1, 2010 for a five year term with a five year renewal option, we will reduce the amount of rented square feet and the base monthly rent payments will be
$49,500 in the first year. At the end of each year, the rent will increase by $1,500 per month.

We
believe that our need for additional funding will increase in the future and that our continued ability to raise funds from external sources will be critical to our success. We
continue to actively consider future contractual arrangements that would require significant financial commitments. If we experience currently unanticipated cash requirements, we could require
additional capital much sooner than presently anticipated. We may raise money by the sale of our equity securities or debt. However, given uncertain market conditions and the volatility of our stock
price, we may not be able to sell our securities in public offerings or private placements at prices and on terms that are favorable to us, if at all. We may also choose to obtain funding through
licensing and other contractual agreements. Such arrangements may require us to relinquish rights to our technologies, products or marketing territories, or to grant licenses on terms that are not
favorable to us. If we fail to obtain adequate funding in a timely manner, or at all, we will be forced to scale back our product development activities or our operations in a manner that will ensure
we can discharge our obligations as they come due in the ordinary course of business.

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

Due to the short-term nature of our interest bearing assets, which consist primarily of certificates of deposit, United
States corporate obligations, and United States government and government agency obligations, we believe that our exposure to interest rate market risk would not significantly affect our operations.

Our
investment policy is to manage our marketable debt securities portfolio to preserve principal and liquidity while maximizing the return on the investment portfolio. Our marketable
securities portfolio is primarily invested in securities with maturities of under one year and a minimum investment grade rating of A or A-1 or better to minimize credit risk. Although
changes in interest rates may affect the fair value of the marketable securities portfolio and cause unrealized gains or losses, such gains or losses would not be realized unless the investments were
to be sold prior to maturity.

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures

As
of June 30, 2010, our management evaluated, with the participation of our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer have
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

24

---





Table of Contents



SUPERGEN, INC.  PART IIOTHER INFORMATION



Item 1A.    Risk Factors

The following section lists some, but not all, of the risks and uncertainties that may have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. You should carefully consider these risks in evaluating our company and business. Our business operations may be impaired if any
of the following risks actually occur, and by additional risks and uncertainties that we do not know of or that we currently consider immaterial. In such case, the trading price of our common stock
could decline.

This report also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from
those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including the risks described below and elsewhere in this report.

Risks Related to Our Financial Condition and Common Stock

If Dacogen is not commercially successful, our future revenues would be limited and our business would be harmed.

Dacogen is approved in the United States, but there is no guarantee that patients and physicians here will adopt it for use, or
continue to use it for the treatment of MDS. If MGI/Eisai's sales of Dacogen decrease, our royalty revenue will decrease commensurately, and we cannot be assured that MGI/Eisai will expend the
resources to expand sales of Dacogen. Currently, the royalty revenue we receive from MGI/Eisai is our primary source of revenue. In the past, our primary source of revenue was from sales of our
product Nipent. The North American rights to Nipent were sold to Mayne/Hospira in August 2006, and the remaining worldwide rights were sold to Mayne/Hospira in April 2007. Accordingly, we are
primarily dependent on Dacogen royalty revenue to fund our operations.

Dacogen
is only approved for the treatment of MDS in the United States and is not yet approved in Europe or Japan. In July 2006, MGI/Eisai sublicensed Dacogen to
Janssen-Cilag GmbH, a Johnson & Johnson company, giving Janssen-Cilag responsibility for conducting regulatory activities related to Dacogen and granting it exclusive development and
commercialization rights in Europe and all territories outside North America. We received 50% of the $10 million upfront payment and, as a result of both the original agreement with MGI/Eisai
and this sublicense with Janssen-Cilag GmbH, may receive up to $17.5 million in future milestone payments upon achievement of global regulatory and sales targets. MGI/Eisai has recently
completed a randomized Phase III clinical trial of Dacogen in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and is planning to file a supplemental marketing application in the U.S
in 2011. Janssen-Cilag is also planning to submit a corresponding marketing application for Dacogen in Europe in 2011. However, if Dacogen is not approved for additional indications in the U.S. or is
never approved in Europe or Japan, we will receive reducing, and ultimately no, royalty payments from commercial sales by Janssen-Cilag and our future revenues and business will be harmed.

Our collaborative relationship with MGI/Eisai may not produce the financial benefits that we are anticipating, which could cause our business to suffer.

We expect to record development and license revenue from payments made to us by MGI/Eisai upon the achievement of regulatory and
commercialization milestones. However, we may never receive such payments because the milestones may never be achieved, either because of failure to secure regulatory approval of Dacogen in Europe or
Japan or due to MGI/Eisai's or Janssen-Cilag's inability to expend the resources to grow or commence sales of Dacogen as prescribed by the license agreement. In addition, the license agreement
provides that MGI/Eisai will pay us (i) a certain portion of revenues payable to MGI/Eisai as a result of MGI/Eisai sublicensing the rights to market, sell and/or distribute

25

---



Table of Contents

Dacogen,
to the extent such revenues are in excess of the milestone payments already due to us under our agreement with MGI/Eisai, and (ii) a 20% royalty increasing to a maximum of 30% on
annual worldwide net sales of Dacogen. We cannot guarantee that we will receive these payments, and we cannot be assured that MGI/Eisai will expend the resources to expand sales of Dacogen in North
America, or that Janssen-Cilag will expend the resources to sell it in Europe and elsewhere, or that either company will be successful in doing so. Because we are heavily reliant on royalties and
milestone payments relating to Dacogen to fund our operations, the failure to achieve the milestones and/or receive royalty revenue from sales of Dacogen would cause our business to suffer.

Our collaborative relationship with GSK may not produce the financial benefits that we are anticipating, which could cause our business to suffer.

Part of our strategy is to partner or out-license selective products to other pharmaceutical companies in order to mitigate
the cost of developing a drug through clinical trials to commercialization. The agreement with GSK is an example of this strategy, providing for the joint development of compounds that we will
discover using our CLIMB technology, followed by the option for GSK to take one or more of the jointly developed compounds and further develop, commercialize, and sell the resulting product worldwide.
The agreement provides for milestone payments to be paid to us during the development process, but the majority of the payments will not occur unless and until GSK exercises its option to license one
or more compounds from us. We will spend our own cash and other resources during the joint development process, and we cannot guarantee that any successful compounds will result from our joint
development efforts. Further, even if we discover and develop one or more viable compounds, we cannot guarantee that GSK will exercise its option to license any such compounds from us. If GSK chooses
not to exercise its license option, we may continue to develop the compounds on our own, but the post-option exercise developmental and sales milestones described in the agreement, which
we have estimated to be approximately $300 million, plus additional royalty revenues, will never be realized. If our joint development program with GSK is not successful, and if we cannot earn
revenue from collaborative arrangements such as this agreement, our future revenues and business will be harmed.

We have a history of operating losses and we may incur losses for the foreseeable future.

Since inception, we have funded our research and development activities primarily from private placements and public offerings of our
securities, milestone and other payments from collaborators, sales of our products, royalty revenue, and product revenues primarily from sales of Nipent. The North American rights to Nipent were sold
to Mayne in August 2006 and we sold the remaining worldwide rights to Nipent to Mayne in April 2007. Our substantial research and development expenditures and limited revenues have resulted in
significant net losses. We have incurred cumulative losses of $351.0 million from inception through June 30, 2010, and our products have not generated sufficient revenues to support our
business during that time. We expect to incur operating losses or be close to break-even over the next few years and, although we were profitable in the year ended December 31, 2009
and the six month period ended June 30, 2010, we may never achieve sustained profitability.

Whether
we achieve sustained profitability depends primarily on the following factors:



26

---



Table of Contents



Our
products and product candidates, even if successfully developed and approved, may not generate sufficient or sustainable revenues to enable us to achieve or sustain profitability.

We will require additional funding to expand our product pipeline and commercialize new drugs, and if we are unable to raise the necessary capital or to do so on acceptable
terms, our planned expansion and continued chances of survival could be harmed.

We will continue to spend substantial resources on expanding our product pipeline, developing future products, and conducting research
and development, including clinical trials for our product candidates. Based on our currently forecasted product development activities, we
anticipate that our capital resources will be adequate to fund operations and capital expenditures at least through 2011. However, if we experience unanticipated cash requirements during this period,
we could require additional funds much sooner. In February 2009 we filed a $100 million shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC, which gives us the flexibility
to raise funds through the sale of a variety of securities. We may raise money by the sale of our equity securities or debt, or the exercise of outstanding stock options by the holders of such
options. However, given uncertain market conditions and the volatility of our stock price, we may not be able to sell our securities in public offerings or private placements at prices and/or on terms
that are favorable to us, if at all. Also, the dilutive effect of additional financings could adversely affect our per share results. We may also choose to obtain funding through licensing and other
contractual agreements. For example, we licensed the worldwide rights to the development, commercialization and distribution of Dacogen to MGI/Eisai. Such arrangements may require us to relinquish our
rights to our technologies, products or marketing territories, or to grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. If we fail to obtain adequate funding in a timely manner, or at all, we will
be forced to scale back our product development activities, or be forced to cease our operations.

Our equity investment in AVI exposes us to equity price risk and any impairment charge would affect our results of operations.

Our investments in marketable securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other
comprehensive gain or loss in stockholders' equity. However, we are exposed to equity price risk on our equity investment in AVI. The public trading prices of the AVI shares have fluctuated
significantly since we purchased them and could continue to do so. If the public trading prices of these shares trade below their adjusted cost basis in future periods, we may incur additional
impairment charges relating to this investment, which in turn will affect our results of operations.

27

---



Table of Contents

Currently
we own 2,384,211 shares of AVI and recorded an other-than-temporary decline in value of $3.1 million related to this investment during the year
ended December 31, 2008. We evaluate investments with unrealized losses to determine if the losses are other than temporary. In making these determinations, we consider the financial condition
and near-term prospects of the issuers, the magnitude of the losses compared to the investments' cost, the length of time the investments have been in an unrealized loss position, and our
ability and intent to hold the investments for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a recovery of fair value. It is possible that we may record another other than temporary decline in value
related to AVI in the future.

Product Development and Regulatory Risks

Our product candidates will require significant additional development.

Most of our product candidates are in the development, rather than the clinical trial stage. However, we must significantly develop all
of our product candidates before we can market them, or before they will become desirable for partnering or licensing. Although we believe that our preclinical and pilot clinical studies support
further development of these product candidates, the results we have obtained to date do not necessarily indicate what the results of further testing would be, including controlled human clinical
testing. All of the product candidates that we are currently developing will require extensive clinical testing before we can submit any regulatory application for their commercial use.

Our product development efforts may ultimately fail.

Our product candidates are subject to the risks of failure inherent in the development of pharmaceutical products. These risks include
the following:



As
a result, we cannot be certain that any of our products will be successfully developed, receive required governmental approvals on a timely basis, become commercially viable or
achieve market acceptance.

Before we can seek regulatory approval of any of our product candidates, we must complete clinical trials, which are expensive and have uncertain outcomes.

All of our product candidates will require the commitment of substantial resources and regulatory approval. Before obtaining regulatory
approvals for the commercial sale of any of our product candidates, we must demonstrate through non-clinical testing and clinical trials that our product candidates are safe and effective
for use in humans.

We
have a portfolio of cancer drugs in various stages of development. We are currently conducting clinical trials on our products amuvatinib and SGI-1776, and expect to
commence clinical trials on SGI-110 in the second half of 2010. We also expect to commence other new clinical trials from time to time in the course of our business as our product
development work continues. Conducting clinical trials is a lengthy, time consuming and expensive process and the results are inherently uncertain. We have incurred and will continue to incur
substantial expense for, and we have devoted and expect to

28

---



Table of Contents

continue
to devote a significant amount of time to, non-clinical testing and clinical trials. However, regulatory authorities may not permit us to undertake any additional clinical trials
for our product candidates. If we are unable to complete our clinical trials, our business will be severely harmed and the price of our stock will likely decline.

We
also have ongoing research and non-clinical projects that may lead to product candidates, but we have not begun clinical trials for these projects. If we do not
successfully complete our non-clinical trials, we might not be able to commence clinical trials as planned.

Our clinical trials may be delayed or terminated, which would prevent us from seeking necessary regulatory approvals.

Completion of clinical trials may take several years or more. The length of a clinical trial varies substantially according to the
type, complexity, novelty and intended use of the product candidate. The length of time and complexity of these studies make statistical analysis difficult and regulatory approval unpredictable. The
commencement and rate of completion of our clinical trials may be delayed by many factors, including:



If
we are unable to achieve a satisfactory rate of completion of our clinical trials, our business will be significantly harmed.

We may be required to suspend, repeat or terminate our clinical trials if they are not conducted in compliance with regulatory requirements.

Our clinical trials must be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the FDA and other regulatory authorities, and are subject
to continuous oversight by these authorities, and institutional review boards and ethical committees. We outsource certain aspects of our research and development activities to contract research
organizations ("CROs"). We have agreements with these CROs for certain of our clinical programs. We and our CROs are required to comply with good clinical practice ("GCP") regulations and guidelines
for all of our products in clinical development. GCPs are enforced through periodic inspections of study sponsors, principal investigators, and study sites. If our CROs or we fail to comply with
applicable GCPs, the clinical data generated in our studies may be deemed unreliable and regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional studies before approving our applications. Our
non-clinical safety studies must be conducted according to the principles of good laboratory practice regulations. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with product
candidates produced under current good manufacturing practices, and may require a large number of test subjects. Our failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical studies,
which would delay the regulatory approval process.

29

---





Table of Contents

We may be required to suspend, repeat or terminate our clinical trials if later trial results fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy, or if the results are negative or
inconclusive.

Our clinical trials may be suspended at any time if we or the FDA believe the patients participating in our studies are exposed to
unacceptable health risks or if we or the FDA find deficiencies in the conduct of these trials. Adverse medical events during a clinical trial could cause us to terminate or repeat a clinical trial.
We may encounter other problems and failures in our studies that would cause us or the FDA to delay or suspend the studies. Even if we achieve positive interim results in clinical trials, these
results do not necessarily predict final results, and acceptable results in early trials may not be repeated in later trials. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry have suffered
significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after achieving promising results in earlier trials.

Negative
or inconclusive results during a clinical trial could cause us to terminate or repeat a clinical trial. The potential failures would delay development of our product candidates,
hinder our ability to conduct related non-clinical testing and clinical trials and further delay the commencement of the regulatory approval process. Further, the failures or perceived
failures in our clinical trials would delay our product development and the regulatory approval process, damage our business prospects, make it difficult for us to establish collaboration and
partnership relationships and negatively affect our reputation and competitive position in the pharmaceutical industry. Finally, if we
are required to conduct other clinical trials for the product candidates, the additional trials would require substantial funding and time, and we may be unable to obtain funding to conduct such
clinical trials.

Our failure to obtain regulatory approvals to market our product candidates in foreign countries and delays caused by government regulation would adversely affect our
anticipated revenues.

Sales of our products in foreign jurisdictions will be subject to separate regulatory requirements and marketing approvals. Approval in
the United States, or in any one foreign jurisdiction, does not ensure approval in any other jurisdiction. The process of obtaining foreign approvals may result in significant delays, difficulties and
expenses for us, and may require additional clinical trials. Although many of the regulations applicable to our products in these foreign countries are similar to those promulgated by the FDA, many of
these requirements also vary widely from country to country, which could delay the introduction of our products in those countries. Failure to comply with these regulatory requirements or to obtain
required approvals would impair our ability to commercialize our products in foreign markets.

Even
if regulatory approval of our products is obtained, later discovery of previously unknown problems may result in restrictions of a product, including withdrawal of that product from
the market. Further, governmental approval may subject us to ongoing requirements for post-marketing studies. For example, despite receipt of governmental approval, the facilities of our
third-party manufacturers are still subject to unannounced inspections by the FDA and must continue to comply with GMPs and other regulations. These regulations govern all areas of production, record
keeping, personnel and quality control. If we or our third-party manufacturers fail to comply with any of the manufacturing regulations, we may be subject to, among other things, product seizures,
recalls, fines, injunctions, suspensions or revocations of marketing licenses, operating restrictions and criminal prosecution.

If we are unable to comply with environmental laws and regulations, our business may be harmed.

We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of
hazardous materials and waste products. We currently maintain a supply of biohazardous materials at some of our facilities. We believe our safety procedures for these materials comply with all
applicable environmental laws and regulations, and we carry insurance coverage we believe is adequate for the size of our business. However, we cannot entirely eliminate the

30

---



Table of Contents

risk
of accidental contamination or injury from these materials. If an accident or environmental discharge occurs, we could be held liable for any resulting damages, which could exceed our insurance
coverage and financial resources.

We
currently outsource certain of our research and development programs involving the controlled use of biohazardous materials. We believe our collaborators have in place safety
procedures for these materials that comply with governmental standards. Nevertheless, if an accident does occur, our research and product development will be negatively affected.

Additional Risks Associated with Our Business

If the third-party manufacturers upon whom we rely fail to produce our products in the volumes that we require on a timely basis, or fail to comply with stringent
regulations applicable to pharmaceutical drug manufacturers, we may face delays in the delivery of, or be unable to meet demand for, our products.

Because we have no manufacturing facilities, we rely on third parties for manufacturing activities related to all of our product
candidates. As we develop new products, we must establish and maintain relationships with manufacturers to produce and package sufficient supplies of our finished pharmaceutical products. Reliance on
third party manufacturing presents the following risks:



Any
of these factors could delay clinical trials or commercialization of our product candidates under development, and entail higher costs.

Our business may be harmed if the manufacture of our products is interrupted or discontinued.

We may be unable to maintain our relationships with our third-party manufacturers. If we need to replace or seek new manufacturing
arrangements, we may have difficulty locating and entering into arrangements with qualified contract manufacturers on acceptable terms, if at all. We are aware of only a limited number of companies on
a worldwide basis who operate manufacturing facilities in which our products can be manufactured to our specifications and in compliance with GMPs. It could take several months, or significantly
longer, for a new contract manufacturing facility to obtain FDA approval and to develop substantially equivalent processes for the production of our product candidates. We may not be able to contract
with any of these companies on acceptable terms, if at all.

If our suppliers cannot provide the components we require, our future product sales and revenue could be harmed.

We rely on third-party suppliers to provide us with numerous components used in our products under development. Relying on third-party
suppliers makes us vulnerable to component failures and interruptions in supply, either of which could impair our ability to conduct clinical trials on a timely basis. Using third-party suppliers
makes it difficult and sometimes impossible for us to maintain quality

31

---



Table of Contents

control,
manage inventory and production schedules and control production costs. Vendor lead times to supply us with ordered components vary significantly and can exceed six months or more. Both now
and as we expand our need for manufacturing capacity, we cannot be sure that our suppliers will furnish us with required components when we need them. These factors could make it difficult for us to
effectively and efficiently manufacture our products, and could adversely impact our clinical trials, product development and future sales of our products.

Some
suppliers are our only source for a particular component, which makes us vulnerable to cost increases and supply interruptions. We generally rely on one manufacturer for each
product.

Vendors
may decide to limit or eliminate sales of certain products to the medical industry due to product liability or other concerns. In the event one of our sole source suppliers
decides not to manufacture the component, goes out of business, or decides to cut off our supply, we may be unable to locate replacement supply sources, or the sources that we may locate may not
provide us with similar reliability or pricing and our business could suffer. If we cannot obtain a necessary component, we may need to find, test and obtain regulatory approval for a replacement
component, produce the component or redesign the related product, which would cause significant delay and could increase our manufacturing costs. Any of these events could adversely impact our future
sales and results of operations.

If we are not able to maintain and successfully establish new collaborative and licensing arrangements with third parties, our product development and business will be
harmed.

Our business model is based on establishing collaborative relationships with other parties both to license compounds upon which our
products and technologies are based and to manufacture our products or our collaborators' products. It is critical that we gain access to compounds and technologies to license for further development.
Due to the expense of the drug approval process we must have relationships with established pharmaceutical companies to offset some of our development costs in exchange for a combination of
development, marketing and distribution
rights. For example, in our collaborative relationship with GSK, we expect to offset the costs of further development of the drugs we jointly develop with GSK, if and when GSK exercises its option to
license such jointly developed drugs.

From
time to time we enter into discussions with various companies regarding the establishment of new collaborations. If we are not successful in establishing new partners for our
product candidates, we may not be able to pursue further development of such product candidates and/or may have to reduce or cease our current development programs, which would materially harm our
business. Even if we are successful in establishing new collaborations, they are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties including:



In
addition, our collaborators may undergo business combinations, which could have the effect of making the collaboration with us less attractive to them for a number of reasons. For
example, if an

32

---



Table of Contents

existing
collaborator purchases a company that is one of our competitors, that company may be less willing to continue its collaboration with us. A company that has a strategy of purchasing companies
with attractive technologies might have less incentive to enter into a collaboration agreement with us. Moreover, disputes may arise with respect to the ownership of rights to any technology or
products developed with any current or future collaborator. Lengthy negotiations with potential collaborators or disagreements between us and our collaborators may lead to delays in or termination of
the research, development or commercialization of product candidates or result in time consuming and expensive litigation or arbitration.

Our collaborative relationships with third parties could cause us to expend significant funds on development costs with no assurance of financial return.

From time to time we enter into collaborative relationships with third parties to co-develop and market products. These
relationships require substantial financial commitments from us, and at the same time the product developments are subject to the same regulatory requirements, risks and uncertainties associated with
the development of our other product candidates. The compounds that are the subject of these collaborative agreements may prove to be ineffective, may fail to receive regulatory approvals, may be
unprotectable by patents or other intellectual property rights, or may not be otherwise commercially viable. If these collaborative relationships are not successful, our product developments will be
adversely affected, and our investments and efforts devoted to the product developments will be wasted.

Our ability to protect our intellectual property rights will be critically important to the success of our business, and we may not be able to protect these rights in the
United States or abroad.

The success of our operations depends in part on our ability to obtain patents, protect trade secrets, operate without infringing the
proprietary rights of others and enforce our proprietary rights against accused infringers.

We
actively pursue a policy of seeking patent protection when applicable for our proprietary products and technologies, whether they are developed in-house or acquired from
third parties. We attempt to protect our intellectual property position by filing United States and foreign patent applications related to our proprietary technology, inventions and improvements that
are important to
the development of our business. To date, we have ownership of or acquired licenses to numerous patents covering various aspects of our proprietary drugs and technologies. In addition, we are
prosecuting a number of patent applications for new drug candidates that we are actively developing at this time.

We
also have patents, licenses to patents, and pending patent applications in Europe, Australia, Japan, Canada, China and Israel among other countries. Limitations on patent protection,
and the differences in what constitutes patentable subject matter, may limit the protection we have on patents issued or licensed to us in these countries. In addition, laws of foreign countries may
not protect our intellectual property to the same extent as would laws in the United States. In determining whether or not to seek patent protection or to license any patent in a foreign country, we
weigh the relevant costs and benefits, and consider, among other things, the market potential and profitability, the scope of patent protection afforded by the law of the jurisdiction and its
enforceability, and the nature of terms with any potential licensees. Failure to obtain adequate patent protection for our proprietary drugs and technology would impair our ability to be commercially
competitive in these markets.

The
pharmaceutical industry is characterized by a large number of patent filings involving complex legal and factual questions, and therefore we cannot predict with certainty whether our
patents will be enforced effectively. Competitors may have filed applications for, or been issued patents on, products or processes that compete with or are similar to ours. We may not be aware of all
of the patents

33

---



Table of Contents

potentially
adverse to our interests which may have been issued to others. In addition, third parties may challenge, invalidate or circumvent any of our patents. Thus, any patents that we own or
license from third parties may not provide adequate protection against competitors, if at all. Our pending patent applications and those we may file in the future, or those we may license from third
parties, may not result in patents being issued with adequate claim scope, if at all.

In
addition to pursuing patent protection in appropriate instances, we also rely on trade secret protection or regulatory marketing exclusivity for unpatented proprietary technology.
However, trade secrets are difficult to protect. Our trade secrets or those of our collaborators may become known or may be independently discovered by others. Furthermore, regulatory marketing
exclusivity is for a limited time period, which may not be an adequate period for our business interests.

In
the pharmaceutical industry there has been, and we believe that there will continue to be, significant litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. Claims may
be brought against us in the future based on patents held by others. These persons could bring legal actions against us claiming damages and seeking to enjoin clinical testing, manufacturing and
marketing of the affected product. If we become involved in litigation, it could consume a substantial portion of our resources, regardless of the outcome of the litigation. If a lawsuit against us is
successful, in addition to any potential liability for damages, we could be required to obtain a license to continue to manufacture or market the affected product. We cannot assure you that we would
prevail in a lawsuit filed against us or that we could obtain any licenses required under any patents on acceptable terms, if at all.

Our
proprietary products are dependent upon compliance with other licenses and agreements. These licenses and agreements require us to make royalty and other payments, reasonably exploit
the underlying technology of the applicable patents, and comply with regulatory filings. If we fail to comply with these licenses and agreements, we could lose the underlying rights to one or more of
these potential products, which would adversely affect our product development and harm our business.

If we fail to compete effectively against other pharmaceutical companies, our business will suffer.

The pharmaceutical industry in general and the oncology sector in particular is highly competitive and subject to significant and rapid
technological change. There are many companies, both public and private, including well-known pharmaceutical companies that are engaged in the discovery and development of products for
some of the applications that we are pursuing. Some of our competitors and probable competitors include ArQule, Array BioPharma, Astex Tx, Crystal Genomics, Exelixis, Infinity, Plexxikon, Vertex,
Sanofi-Aventis, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene, Eli Lilly & Co., GSK, Novartis AG, Pfizer, and others.

Many
of our competitors have substantially greater financial, research and development, and manufacturing resources than we do and may represent substantial long-term
competition for us. Some of our competitors have received regulatory approval for products or are developing or testing product candidates that compete directly with our product candidates. For
example, amuvatinib faces competition from a multitude of other investigational drugs which are multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors and inhibitors of the DNA repair pathway. We also expect that
there will be other inhibitors of Pim kinases that will emerge as competition for SGI-1776 as well as other investigational drugs progressing through our discovery pipeline. In addition,
Dacogen faces competition from 5-aza-cytidine as well as oral formulations of 5-aza-cytidine and other drugs in development to treat MDS.

Many
of these competitors, either alone or together with their customers and partners, have significantly greater experience than we do in discovering products, undertaking
non-clinical testing and clinical trials, obtaining FDA and other regulatory approvals, and manufacturing and marketing products. Accordingly, our competitors may succeed in obtaining
patent protection, receiving FDA or foreign marketing approval or commercializing products before we do. If we elect to commence commercial product sales of our product candidates, we could be at a
disadvantage relative to many

34

---



Table of Contents

companies
with greater marketing and manufacturing capabilities, areas in which we have limited or no experience.

Factors
affecting competition in the pharmaceutical industry vary depending on the extent to which competitors are able to achieve an advantage based on superior differentiation of their
products, greater institutional knowledge, or depth of resources. If we are able to establish and maintain a competitive advantage based on the ability of CLIMB to discover new drug candidates more
quickly and against targets not accessible by many competitors, our advantage will likely depend primarily on the ability of our CLIMB technology to make accurate predictions about the effectiveness
and safety of our drug candidates as well as our ability to effectively and rapidly develop investigational drugs.

Extensive
research and development efforts and rapid technological progress characterize the industry in which we compete. Although we believe that our proprietary drug discovery
capabilities afford us a competitive advantage relative to other discovery and development companies competing in oncology, we expect competitive intensity in this pharmaceutical segment to continue.
Discoveries by others may render CLIMB and our current and potential products noncompetitive. Our competitive position also depends on our ability to attract and retain qualified scientific and other
personnel at all our geographic locations, develop effective proprietary products, implement development plans, obtain patent protection and secure adequate capital resources.

The pharmaceutical industry in general and the oncology sector in particular is subject to significant and rapid technological change. Developments by competitors may render
our product candidates or technologies obsolete or non-competitive.

Our competitors may succeed in developing technologies or products that are more effective than ours. Additionally, our products that
are under patent protection face intense competition from competitors' proprietary products. This competition may increase as new products enter the market.

A
number of our competitors have substantially more capital, research and development, regulatory, manufacturing, marketing, human and other resources and experience than we have. As a
result, our competitors may:



We
will also face increasing competition from lower-cost generic products after patents on our proprietary products expire. Loss of patent protection typically leads to a
rapid decline in sales for that product and could affect our future results. As new products enter the market, our products may become obsolete or our competitors' products may be more effective or
more effectively marketed and sold than our products. Technological advances, competitive forces and loss of intellectual property protection rights for our products may render our products obsolete.

We may be subject to product liability lawsuits and our insurance may be inadequate to cover damages.

Clinical trials and commercial use of our current and potential products may expose us to liability claims from the use or sale of
these products. Consumers, healthcare providers, pharmaceutical companies and others selling such products might make claims of this kind. We may experience financial losses in the future due to
product liability claims. We have obtained limited product liability insurance coverage for our products and clinical trials, under which the coverage limits are $10 million

35

---



Table of Contents

per
occurrence and $10 million in the aggregate. We do not know whether this coverage will be adequate to protect us in the event of a claim. We may not be able to obtain or maintain insurance
coverage in the future at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts to protect us against losses. If third parties bring a successful product liability claim or series of claims against us for
uninsured liabilities or in excess of insured liabilities, we may not have sufficient financial resources to complete development or commercialization of any of our product candidates and our business
and results of operations will be adversely affected.

If we are unable to attract and retain additional, highly skilled personnel required for the expansion of our activities, our business will suffer.

Our success is dependent on key personnel, including members of our senior management and scientific staff at all our geographic
locations. If any of our executive officers decides to leave and we cannot locate a qualified replacement in time to allow a smooth transition, our business may be adversely affected. To successfully
expand our operations, we will need to attract and retain additional highly skilled individuals, particularly in the areas of clinical administration, non-clinical and development
research, manufacturing and finance. We compete with other companies for the services of existing and potential employees, however to the extent these employees favor larger, more established
employers, we may be at a disadvantage.

Earthquake or other natural or man-made disasters and business interruptions could adversely affect our business.

Our operations are vulnerable to interruption by fire, power loss, floods, telecommunications failure and other events beyond our
control. In addition, our operations are susceptible to disruption as a result of natural disasters such as earthquakes. So far we have never experienced any significant disruption of our operations
as a result of earthquakes or other natural disasters. Although we have a contingency recovery plan, any significant business interruption could cause delays in our drug development and future sales
and harm our business.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and applicable Delaware law may prevent or discourage third parties or stockholders from attempting to replace our
management.

Anti-takeover provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws make it more difficult for a third party to acquire
us, even if doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. These provisions include:



Our
bylaws establish procedures, including notice procedures, with regard to the nomination, other than by or at the direction of our board of directors, of candidates for election as
directors or for stockholder proposals to be submitted at stockholder meetings.

We
are also subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, an anti-takeover provision. In general, Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law prevents a stockholder owning 15% or more of a corporation's outstanding voting stock from engaging in business combinations with a Delaware corporation for three years following the
date the stockholder acquired 15% or more of a corporation's outstanding voting stock. This restriction is subject to exceptions, including the approval of the board of directors and of the holders of
at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of voting stock not owned by the interested stockholder.

36

---



Table of Contents

We
believe that the benefits of increased protection of our potential ability to negotiate with the proponents of unfriendly or unsolicited proposals to acquire or restructure us
outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging those proposals because, among other things, negotiation of those proposals could result in an improvement of their terms. Nevertheless, these provisions are
expected to discourage different types of coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of our company to first negotiate with us, and
may have the effect of preventing or discouraging third parties or stockholders from attempting to replace our management.

Item 6.    Exhibits

Exhibit No.

Description of Document31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200231.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200232.1

Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002


37

---





Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

SUPERGEN, INC.Date:

November 4, 2010



By:

/s/ JAMES S.J. MANUSO James S.J. Manuso, Ph.D. President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)By:

/s/ MICHAEL MOLKENTIN Michael Molkentin Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


38

---