alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration
 Periodically, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) publishes abstracts of information collection requests under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of the clearance requests submitted to OMB for review, e-mail 
                    *paperwork@hrsa.gov*
                     or call the HRSA Reports Clearance Office on (301) 443-1129. The following request has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995: HRSA Telehealth Outcome Measures (OMB No. 0915-0311)—Extension In order to help carry out its mission, the Office for the Advancement of Telehealth (OAT) created a set of performance measures that grantees can use to evaluate the effectiveness of their services programs and monitor their progress through the use of performance reporting data. As required by the Government Performance and Review Act of 1993 (GPRA), all Federal agencies must develop strategic plans describing their overall goal and objectives. OAT has worked with its grantees to develop performance measures to be used to evaluate and monitor the progress of the grantees. Grantee goals are to: improve access to needed services; reduce rural practitioner isolation; improve health system productivity and efficiency; and improve patient outcomes. In each of these categories, specific indicators were designed to be reported through a performance monitoring Web site. The estimates of burden are as follows: Form
Number of 
                             respondents
Average number of responses per respondent
Total 
                             responses
Hours per 
                             response
Total burden hoursPerformance Measurement Tool
667
2
1,334
7
9,338
 Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of this notice to the desk officer for HRSA, either by e-mail to 
                    *OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov*
                     or by fax to 202-395-6974. Please direct all correspondence to the “attention of the desk officer for HRSA.” Dated: September 7, 2010. Sahira Rafiullah, Director, Division of Policy and Information Coordination.


[FR Doc. 2010-22797 Filed 9-13-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
#### COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 1087 v. MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES.

January 17, 1984.

Petition for certification granted.
No. 12,067.

#### The Board of Commissioners of Benton County *v.*Harman.

*Sheriff.*— Compensation *for Keeping Jail.*— Beyond the compensation fixed by statute for boarding, receiving and discharging prisoners, a sheriff is not entitled to pay for services in keeping the county jail.

*¡Same.*— Not *Liable for Bent for Jail Besidence.*— A sheriff is not bound to pay rent for the part of the jail building occupied by him as a residence.

From the Benton Circuit Court.

*D. E.*Straight, for appellant.

*D. Fraser,*for appellee.

Elliott, J.

The facts were specially found by the court and cohclusions of law stated. Two of the conclusions of law exhibit the principal questions in the case, as the others are repetitions of the same matter expressed in a little different form of words. The conclusions of law to which we refer are these:

*552Filed May 2, 1885.

> *“Fifth.*The plaintiff, as sheriff of Benton county, has a legal demand against the defendant, the board of commissioners, for the reasonable value of the service and labor-necessary to the proper keeping of the jail and the prisoners committed thereto during the time it was kept by him.

> *“Sixth.*That the plaintiff is not liable to the defendant for-rent for the use and occupation of any part of the jail building, or of the residence included therein, during the time it was occupied by him as sheriff of said county and keeper of the jail.”

The first of these conclusions is erroneous; a sheriff is not entitled to pay for services in keeping the jail. The compensation fixed by statute for boarding, receiving and discharging prisoners, covers and embraces the services of the sheriff' in maintaining and caring for the jail and the prisoners. We have repeatedly held that an officer can not successfully claim compensation for services unless there is a statute providing-that he shall receive remuncration. *Board, etc.,*v. *Gresham, ante,*p. 53; *Bynum*v. *Board, etc.,*100 Ind. 90; *Wright*v. *Board, etc.,*98 Ind. 88; *Moon*v. *Board, etc.,*97 Ind. 176; *Donaldson*v. *Board, etc.,*92 Ind. 80.

In thus holding, we have but followed the settled rule of the common law. *Graham*v. *Grill,*2 M. *&*S. 294; *Dew*v. *Parsons,*1 Chitty, 295; *Woodgate*v. *Knatchbull,*2 T. R. 148; *Rex*v. *Jethewell,*Parker (Exch.) 177; *Lane*v. *Sewell,*1 Chitty, 175; *Slater*v. *Hames,*7 M. *&*W. 413; *Baker*v. *Davenport,*8 D. & R. 606.

The sixth conclusion of law is correct. The sheriff is not bound to pay rent for the part of the jail building occupied by him as a residence.

Judgment reversed, with instructions to re-state conclusions of law, and to render judgment thereon in favor of the-appellant.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 99 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 99

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
concerning the election of the Members of the House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 2008

 Mr. Larson of Connecticut introduced the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
concerning the election of the Members of the House of Representatives.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The House of Representatives shall be composed of 
Members chosen every fourth year by the people of the several States. 
Immediately after the first election, they shall be assembled and 
divided as equally as may be into two classes. The seats of the 
Representatives of the first class shall be vacated at the expiration 
of the second year and the second class at the expiration of the fourth 
year, so that one-half may be chosen every second year.
    ``Section 2. This article shall not be so construed as to affect 
the election or term of any Representative chosen before it becomes 
valid as part of the Constitution.
    ``Section 3. This article shall apply to the first election of 
Representatives which occurs after ratification but no earlier than 
2012.
    ``Section 4. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
583 A.2d 325

#### BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE, ETC., v. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX AND MIDDLESEX COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY.

February 20, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
IIA 

Calendar No. 896 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 93 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2008 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in 

the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RENEWAL OF IMPORT RESTRICTIONS UNDER 

4 THE BURMESE FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY 

5 ACT OF 2003. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Congress approves the renewal of 

7 the import restrictions contained in section 3(a)(1) of the 

8 Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003. 

9 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—This joint resolution 

10 shall be deemed to be a ‘‘renewal resolution’’ for purposes 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

HJ 93 PCS 

1 of section 9 of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act 

2 of 2003. 

3 SEC. 2. CERTAIN COBRA FEES. 

4 Section 13031(j)(3)(B)(i) of the Consolidated Omni5 bus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 

6 58c(j)(3)(B)(i)) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 

7 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘October 7, 2017’’. 

8 SEC. 3. TIME FOR PAYMENT OF CORPORATE ESTIMATED 

9 TAXES. 

10 The percentage under subparagraph (C) of section 

11 401(1) of the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation 

12 Act of 2005 in effect on the date of the enactment of this 

13 Act is increased by 0.25 percentage points. 

14 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

15 This joint resolution and the amendments made by 

16 this joint resolution shall take effect on the date of the 

17 enactment of this joint resolution or July 26, 2008, which18 ever occurs first. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Calendar No. 896 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 93 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the renewal of import restrictions conAct of 2003. tained in the Burmese Freedom and Democracy 

JULY 23, 2008 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Christopher C. Duignan, certify that:

|  
|--
|1.
|  
|2.
|  
|3.
|  
|4.

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
  the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
  regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
  procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal that has materially affected, or is
  reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

|  
|--
|5.

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
  ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

|                    |  |     |  |                                                                       
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 12, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ CHRISTOPHERC. DUIGNANChristopher C. DuignanChief Financial Officer



---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 164 DB 2020 (No. 95 RST 2020)

:

JILL WITTENBORN DUFFY : Attorney Registration No. 67075

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

 FROM INACTIVE STATUS : (Bucks County)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of December, 2020, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated December 2, 2020, is approved and it is ORDERED 

that Jill Wittenborn Duffy, who has been on Inactive Status, has demonstrated that she 

has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to 

practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a 

member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the 

investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
II 

Calendar No. 147 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1124 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2007 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To extend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 

1999. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 5–YEAR REAUTHORIZATION OF TUITION AS4 SISTANCE PROGRAMS. 

5 (a) PUBLIC SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 3(i) of the 

6 District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 (sec. 38– 

7 2702(i), DC Official Code) is amended by striking ‘‘each 

8 of the 7 succeeding fiscal years’’ and inserting ‘‘each of 

9 the 12 succeeding fiscal years’’. 

10 (b) PRIVATE SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 5(f) of 

11 such Act (sec. 38–2704(f), DC Official Code) is amended 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

HR 1124 PCS

1 by striking ‘‘each of the 7 succeeding fiscal years’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘each of the 12 succeeding fiscal years’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

Calendar No. 147 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1124 

AN ACT 

To extend the District of Columbia College Access 

M

Act of 1999. 

AY 15, 2007 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-60010

Summary Calendar

Ahed Abdul Hadi Sheeti; Majed Mohd Al-Hatabeh; 

Hamza Majed Al Hatabeh, 

Petitioners,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, 

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Agency Nos. A206 946 871, A206 946 872, A206 946 875

Before Barksdale, Elrod, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Ahed Abdul Hadi Sheeti, Syrian native and citizen of Jordan, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denying her 

application for asylum and rejecting her claim the Immigration Judge (IJ) 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 28, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-60010 Document: 00516558743 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/28/2022
No. 22-60010

2

denied her due-process. (Her husband and minor son are derivative 

applicants on her application.) 

In considering the BIA’s decision (and the IJ’s, to the extent it 

influenced the BIA), legal questions are reviewed de novo; factual findings, 

for substantial evidence. E.g., Orellana-Monson v. Holder, 685 F.3d 511, 517–

18 (5th Cir. 2012). Under the substantial-evidence standard, petitioner must 

demonstrate “the evidence is so compelling that no reasonable factfinder 

could reach a contrary conclusion”. Chen v. Gonzales, 470 F.3d 1131, 1134 

(5th Cir. 2006). 

Sheeti’s testimony in support of asylum revolves around economic 

and criminal issues regarding knowledge of her former employer’s business 

practices in Jordan. Because the record does not reflect direct political 

activity (the claimed statutorily-protected ground) that casts “a political

shadow over an otherwise largely economic claim”, Sheeti fails to satisfy the 

requisite persecution based on a political belief. Ontunez-Tursios v. Ashcroft, 

303 F.3d 341, 352 (5th Cir. 2002). 

Further, Sheeti’s procedural due-process rights have not been 

violated. She contends the IJ’s interpreter spoke a different Arabic dialect, 

causing her confusion. She did not, however, object to the translator and 

made no indications during her hearing that translation was an issue, nor does 

she point to any part of the record as incorrectly translated. Accordingly, she 

has made no showing of substantial prejudice that affected the proceedings. 

E.g., Ogunfuye v. Holder, 610 F.3d 303, 306–07 (5th Cir. 2010) (due-process 

violation requires establishing the violation affected outcome of 

proceedings). 

DENIED.

Case: 22-60010 Document: 00516558743 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/28/2022
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobeTel Communications Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Thomas Y. Jimenez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Thomas Y. Jimenez
Chief Financial Officer
May 12, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             2,328
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      2,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                           8
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   2,351
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    13,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                949
<BONDS>                                              195
<COMMON>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                        12,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      13,823
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     211
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     903
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     199
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (906)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (906)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (906)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (31.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (31.09)
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 17, 2017

No. 04-16-00025-CV

Beatrice VASQUEZ & Darryl De La Cruz,

Appellants

v.

OLD AUSTIN ROAD LAND TRUST, Joseph Anthony Pizzini Individually and as Trustee of 

Old Austin Road Land Trust, & John Price,

Appellees

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-20809

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The panel has considered the appellants’ motion for rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of July, 2017.

___________________________________

Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6837]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            MORNING BUSINESS

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. We are now in morning business for a time not 
to extend beyond the hour of 12 noon.
  During morning business, Senators are permitted to speak therein for 
not to exceed 5 minutes.

                          ____________________
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RONALD L. O’BARA.

Jan. 14, 1980.

Petition for certification denied.