alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5486]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             REPUBLICANS TO STUDENTS: NEED HELP? FORGET IT

  (Mr. GONZALEZ asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. GONZALEZ. Mr. Speaker, America is the place that invented mass 
education, and that is one thing that made this the great country that 
it is.
  For the past 50 years, great programs like the GI bill and the 
Student Loan Program have opened the doors of opportunity to 
generations of kids from poor, struggling families. The strongest, 
richest, most progressive regions in America are those regions where a 
fine education is within the reach of every worthy student, no matter 
how poor that student might be.
  One would think that with millions of success stories, and one would 
think that with all the lessons of history, the Republicans would 
conclude that education ought to get a very high priority.
  Nope. The Republicans want to strangle very form of student aid. They 
want to add thousands of dollars to the cost of student loans, and make 
deep cuts in every other kind of student aid. Hundreds of thousands of 
deserving kids will find it impossible to afford a good college 
education.
  In my district alone there are almost 33,000 students who need 
student loans to make it through school. Losing the interest rate 
benefit will cost them millions of dollars. Since my district is among 
the Nation's poorest, many of those kids will lose their best chance 
for a decent life.
  The Republican message to them is that hard work and studious habits 
do not pay. The Republican message to the 50 per cent of kids who need 
help to go to college is forget it. As a social policy it is tragic. As 
an economic policy, it is foolish. Our Government has assisted 
education as a high priority since the Northwest Ordinance of 1789. 
George Washington must be embarrassed to see the Republican budget.

                          ____________________
```
# Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed October 27, 2021

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No s

. 3D 1 9

- 1315 & 3D20

- 1179 Lower Tribunal No. 1 7

- 1 8931

________________
College Health II, GP, Inc. , Appellant,

vs. Vincenzo Depau , Appellee.

Appeal s from the C ircuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Jacqueline Hogan Scola and William Thomas , Judge s

. Crabtree & Auslander, and John G. Crabtree, Charles M. Auslander , Brian C. Tackenberg and Emily Cabrera , for appellant

. Carey Rodriguez Milian, LLP, and Ruben Conitzer, David P. Milian , Bianca C. Alvar ez and Jennifer M. Hernandez , for appellee.

Before LOGUE , SCA L E S and L INDS E Y , JJ.
PER CURIAM

.2 In this foreclosure action, the trial court denied appellant College Health II, GP, Inc.’s (“College Health”) motion s seeking to vacate a court
default and resulting final default judgment. 1 Citing a line of cases holding
that a default must be lifted if the plaintiff 's lawyer is aware that the defaultin g
defendant is represented by counsel, 2 College Health asserts that the trial court was required to vacate the default and default final judgment because appellee Vi n cenzo Depau’s counsel was aware, by virtue of a notice of appearance filed in a related, but different, foreclosure case, that College
Health was represented by counsel in the ins t ant case . This line of cases, however, requires not only "actual knowledge" that the defa ulting party is represented by counsel, but also, "actual knowledge" that the defaulting party intends to defend against the lawsuit. See Lloyd , 981 So. 2d at 640;

1 In appellate case number 3D19

- 1315, College Health appeals the June 3, 2019 final order that both (i) denies College Health’s verified motion to vacate the court’s default brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(d) , and (ii) enters final default judgment for appellee. While 3D19

- 1 3 15 was pending, this Court relinquished jurisdiction so that College Health could file a Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 motion in the lower court to vacate the June 3 rd final judgment

. In appellate case n umber 3D20

- 1179, College Health appeals the August 14, 2020 order denying its rule 1.540 motion . This Court consolidated the appeals for all purposes.

2 See e.g. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Lloyd , 981 So. 2d 633, 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. McWilliams , 799 So. 2d 378, 380 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Gulf Maintenance & Supply, Inc. v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 543 So. 2d 813, 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).3 McWilliams , 799 So. 2d at 380; Gulf Maintenance & Supply , 543 So. 2d at
816

. On this record, we are unable to conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by determining that Depau’s counsel was not aware of College
Health’s intent ion to defend against Depau ’ s foreclosure claim, and we are therefore compelled to affirm. Lloyd , 982 So. 2d 6 39 (recognizing that an order denying a motion to vacate a default is reviewed under an abuse of
discretion standard ).
Affirmed.
761 A.2d 544

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. James Darrell LOUGHARD, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued Sept. 11, 2000.

Decided Nov. 27, 2000.

Lawrence J. Casella, Pittsburgh, for J. Loughard.

John G. Knorr, Gerald J. Pappert, Harrisburg, for Com. of Pennsylvania.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of November, 2000, the order of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. *Erie v. Pap’s A.M. t/d/b/a/ Kandyland,*529 U.S. 277, 120 S.Ct. 1382, 146 L.Ed.2d 265 (2000).

Justice NEWMAN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
News United States Air Force
 The "almost" candy bombers of IraqPublished Sept. 2, 2014
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Shawn Nickel
                        
                        
                        Air Forces Central Command Public Affairs
                **U.S. CENTRAL COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (AFNS) --**
                The U.S. government provided the container delivery system bundles and the military aircraft, but something just seemed to be missing on the airdrop packages. Master Sgt. Stephen Brown had something sweet for the kids in mind to make things just right.
Following in the footsteps of retired Col. Gail Halvorsen, the original Candy Bomber of World War II, Brown taped a package of Skittles to a bundle of Halal Meals Ready to Eat, which was delivered in an airdrop to displaced Iraqis in the vicinity of Sinjar Mountain in northern Iraq earlier this month.
"Although my favorite candy that doesn't melt in this desert heat is Starburst, I took what I had in my bag and just taped it to the side of the box," he said. "After that everyone started making the drops a little personal with more candy, and I even think I saw a teddy bear."
The acts of kindness were a slippery slope for the 816th Expeditionary Airlift Squadron aircrews, which have graduated from single packs of candy to garbage bags full of donated sweet treats for the most recent airdrops Aug. 31, in the area of Amirli, Iraq.
"We've been really impressed with the turn out and dedication of our wingmen," said Master Sgt. Emily Edmunds, the 816th EAS loadmaster superintendent. "We are definitely not at the level of the Candy Bomber, but I'd give us an 'almost' for our modern version of it."
Overall, two C-17 Globemaster IIIs and two C-130 Hercules dropped 10,545 gallons of water and 7,056 Halal Meals Ready to Eat in 109 bundles, and almost every one dropped with a little extra. Items Airmen received in care packages, bought themselves, and even were given just for the occasion have made this a big deal for the squadron, Brown said.
"I can just imagine being in the shoes of these parents down there. Not being able to provide much during a time of war would be heartbreaking," he said. "This could be something that will make a dire situation a little brighter even if it's just for a few moments."humanitarian aid 



ISIL 



candy bombers 



U.S. Central Command 



Iraq
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nine Energy Service, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ann G. Fox, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|        |                                                                                                                                                  |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                             |
| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |

 

|           |                                                                                                                                                      |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|      |                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 

| /s/  Ann G. Fox                            |
|-------------------------------------------------|
| Ann G. Fox                                      |
| President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                   |
| Date:                                           | March 29, 2018 |

 

|        |                                                 |                    |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
|   |
|   |                                            |               |
|   | /s/  Donald J. Gawick                      |
|   | Donald J. Gawick                                |
|   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer)                   |
|   | Date:                                           | March 1, 2018 |
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# F-16 accident investigation complete 

              - Published  Oct. 31, 2013

**JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --  **
Air Force officials announced the results of an F-16D Fighting Falcon accident investigation today. The investigation into the June 26, F-16 mishap at Luke Air Force Base, Ariz., determined the mishap was due to the pilot’s decision-making error after the aircraft suffered low-altitude bird strikes following takeoff.

The mishap instructor pilot and mishap student pilot, assigned to the 56th Fighter Wing’s 309th Fighter Squadron, were executing a planned touch-and-go training exercise when the aircraft’s engine ingested several birds resulting in degraded engine performance. 

The Accident Investigation Board found evidence that the cause of the mishap was a result of the pilot erroneously electing to make an immediate turn that robbed the aircraft of altitude and airspeed, rather than climbing straight ahead to achieve minimum maneuvering speed for aircraft recovery. The mishap instructor pilot’s channelized attention and breakdown of visual scan limited the time to fully analyze the situation and successfully recover flight. All of the factors substantially contributed to the aircraft mishap.

Both pilots were able to safely exit the aircraft, suffering only minor injuries. There were no fatalities or significant injuries, and only limited damage to civilian property. The estimated damage costs are approximately $22 million.

The president of the Accident Investigation Board was Col. John J. Menozzi. He is assigned as the 71st Flying Training Wing Vice Wing Commander at Vance AFB, Okla.

 

accidentsafetyLuke AFBArizonaf-16
1 Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by

designation.

 

2 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________

No. 96-30933

____________

METAL SALES MANUFACTURING CORP, USA, for the

use and benefit of

Plaintiff - Counter-Defendant - Appellee

VERSUS

ACADIAN BUILDERS OF GONZALES INC

Defendant - Counter-Claimant - CrossDefendant - Appellant

AMERICAN BONDING COMPANY

Defendant - Cross-Claimant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(94-CV-614)

September 25, 1997

Before GIBSON1, JOLLY and, EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:2

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on

appeal and find that the magistrate judge did not clearly err in

allocating damages stemming from the Fort Polk Project.

Acadian Builders seeks additional damages alleging that Metal
-2-

Sales’ failure to timely deliver materials it was contractually

obligated to deliver to the Fort Polk Project caused it damage far

greater than that allotted by the magistrate judge. Acadian

contends that the magistrate judge imposed too strenuous a burden

upon Acadian Builders. See Austin v. Parker, 672 F.2d 508, 521

(5th Cir. 1982). We disagree. The magistrate judge merely made

credibility choices on conflicting evidence. “Our reading of the

Louisiana cases convinced us that [Acadian Builders could have]

recover[ed] for [additional] amounts spent to complete the work in

excess of the contract price so long as [it had] prove[d] them to

the court’s satisfaction.” Id. at 522. It did not.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



SPACEDEV, INC.
San Diego, CA

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (333-47338) of SPACEDEV, INC. of our report dated February
13, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Company
appearing in its Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002. Our report
contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.

We also consent to the reference to us under the caption "Experts" in the
Prospectus.



/s/ Nation Smith Hermes Diamond

Nation Smith Hermes Diamond,
Accountants and Consultants, APC
San Diego, California
March 25, 2003
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 83 (Thursday, May 18, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5365]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         SPECIAL ORDERS GRANTED

  By unanimous consent, permission to address the House, following the 
legislative program and any special orders heretofore entered, was 
granted to:
  (The following Members (at the request of Mr. Skaggs) to revise and 
extend their remarks and include extraneous material:)
  Ms. Kaptur, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Owens, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. DeFazio, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Pallone, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Skaggs, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Poshard, for 5 minutes, today.
  The following Members (at the request of Mr. Dickey) to revise and 
extend their remarks and include extraneous material:
  Mr. Kim, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Norwood, for 5 minutes, today.
  Mr. Young of Alaska, for 5 minutes, today.

                          ____________________
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALFRED ROYAL.

March 27, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 PACAF earns SECAF Safety AwardPublished March 2, 2015
                        
                        By Pacific Air Forces Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii (AFNS) --**
                The 2014 Air Force safety awards were announced Feb. 25, naming Pacific Air Forces the recipient of the Secretary of the Air Force Safety Award, the highest safety award in the Air Force."The Secretary of the Air Force Safety Award recognizes the concerted efforts and discipline of the more than 46,000 Airmen in PACAF as the best in the Air Force." said Col. James Shigekane, the PACAF director of safety. "I'm extremely impressed with the cooperation PACAF Airmen have displayed while completing their mission professionally and efficiently, all while making safety a top priority."Two SECAF Safety Award awards are presented annually, one for major commands and one for forward operating agencies and direct-reporting units."It is evident that an unrelenting safety culture, exercised daily by every Airman in PACAF, provides the foundation for success in all five PACAF Lines of Operation," Shigekane said.PACAF's other accolade included Aero Club Safety Certificates for the Yokota Air Base, Japan, Aero Club."It's an honor to recognize the Airmen and units that make the Air Force safety program one of the best," said Air Force Chief of Safety Maj. Gen. Kurt F. Neubauer. "The keystone of their success is sustained leadership involvement and every Airman's commitment to be ready and able to fly, fight and win."safety 



awards 



PACAF
News United States Air Force
 New weapons simulator helps refine marksmanship skillsPublished Feb. 2, 2015
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Areca T. Wilson
                        
                        
                        633rd Air Base Wing Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE LANGLEY-EUSTIS, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Airmen from the 633rd Security Forces Squadron refined their marksmanship skills Jan. 26, using a new weapons simulator at Joint Base Langley-Eustis’ Combat Arms center.The Meggitt Training Systems’ simulator allows Airmen to gain real-world experience with the use of realistic situations, while saving Air Force resources. By allowing Airmen to practice more before going to the range, less ammunition is used on re-shoots and the level of risk for injury is lowered."With use of these scenarios, Airmen can go through escalation and de-escalation situations here in a training environment," said Staff Sgt. Ron Turner, a 633rd SFS training instructor. "When they do go out on patrol, they'll be able to handle the situation correctly."In addition to providing Airmen with knowledge on possible law enforcement developments, the simulator also allows them to use the gear they would normally use while on patrol.According to Turner, the simulator is realistic because it uses compressed air, is the same weight as a real firearm, and uses magazines to reload the weapon. Additionally, the weapon is not tethered to a wire.It can even help correct and improve a shooter's technique."With the use of marksmanship mode, the system will give problematic shooters real-time feedback," Turner said. "You can see where your weapon is pointing during the shot and (it'll notify the shooter if they) are putting too much or too little finger pressure onto the trigger. It also helps you control your breathing by giving you feedback."Turner said because the simulator can correct technique, Airmen who do not use firearms regularly will be able to receive a little more practice before qualifying, which can save the Air Force money by not requiring Airmen to requalify.Though the goal of using the simulator is to help Airmen gain realistic experience during training, Langley has taken a step closer to giving its Airmen enhanced training while reducing the number of Air Force assets used.CATM 



range 



Joint Base Langley-Eustis 



ACC 



SFS 



security forces 



simulator 



M4 



633rd Security Forces Squadron
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Quintiles Transnational Corp. and Subsidiaries
Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quintiles Transnational Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis
B. Gillings, Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Dennis B. GillingsDennis B. GillingsExecutive Chairman andChief Executive OfficerAugust 13, 2004Date
 This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of
any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.