alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 13 selected for nuclear, missile squadron command, chief of safetyPublished Nov. 17, 2015
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Ian Hoachlander
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force has selected 13 lieutenant colonels and lieutenant colonel-selects for nuclear and missile operations squadron commander and chief of safety positions.
The officers were among 30 candidates named earlier this year. Candidates who are not on the selection list will remain eligible for additional vacancies throughout calendar year 2016.
"Becoming a squadron commander or wing chief of safety is a great opportunity for our officers," said Zannis Pappas, a nuclear and missile operations career field manager. "Selection for these positions is very competitive since we have many high quality nuclear and missile operations officers to choose from. The officers selected were nominated by their supervisors and vetted by the nuclear and missile operations development team to the hiring authorities. They possess the right expertise and leadership qualities to lead Airmen in accomplishing this critical Air Force mission."
To see the commander selection list, visit the officer assignment page on the myPers website.
For more information about Air Force personnel programs go to the myPers website. Individuals who do not have a myPers account can request one by following the instructions on the Air Force Retirees Services website.nuclear 



missile 



AFPC
583 A.2d 321

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HENRY BRUCE JACOBOSKI.

February 13, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1080 

To modify the boundaries of Grand Teton National Park to include certain 

land within the GT Park Subdivision, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2007 

Mrs. CUBIN (for herself and Mr. UDALL of Colorado) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To modify the boundaries of Grand Teton National Park 

to include certain land within the GT Park Subdivision, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Grand Teton National 

5 Park Extension Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) PARK.—The term ‘‘Park’’ means the Grand 

9 Teton National Park. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1080 IH

1 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of the Interior. 

3 (3) SUBDIVISION.—The term ‘‘Subdivision’’ 

4 means the GT Park Subdivision, with an area of ap5 proximately 49.67 acres, as generally depicted on— 

6 (A) the plat recorded in the Office of the 

7 Teton County Clerk and Recorder on December 

8 16, 1997, numbered 918, entitled ‘‘Final Plat 

9 GT Park Subdivision’’, and dated June 18, 

10 1997; and 

11 (B) the map entitled ‘‘2006 Proposed 

12 Grand Teton Boundary Adjustment’’, numbered 

13 136/80,198, and dated March 21, 2006, which 

14 shall be on file and available for inspection in 

15 appropriate offices of the National Park Serv16 ice. 

17 SEC. 3. ACQUISITION OF LAND. 

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may accept from 

19 any willing donor the donation of any land or interest in 

20 land of the Subdivision. 

21 (b) ADMINISTRATION.—On acquisition of land or an 

22 interest in land under subsection (a), the Secretary shall— 

23 (1) include the land or interest in the bound24 aries of the Park; and 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1080 IH

1 (2) administer the land or interest as part of 

2 the Park, in accordance with all applicable laws (in3 cluding regulations). 

4 (c) DEADLINE FOR ACQUISITION.—It is the intent of 

5 Congress that the acquisition of land or an interest in land 

6 under subsection (a) be completed not later than 1 year 

7 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

8 (d) RESTRICTION ON TRANSFER.—The Secretary 

9 shall not donate, sell, exchange, or otherwise transfer any 

10 land acquired under this section without express author11 ization from Congress. 

12 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

13 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sec14 retary such sums as are necessary to carry out this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
News United States Air Force
 Contingency response Airmen support exercise Northern StrikePublished Aug. 18, 2016
                        
                        By Senior Airman Amber Carter
                        
                        
                        60th Air Mobility Wing Public Affairs
                **TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFNS) --**
                Airmen from the 821st Contingency Response Group here recently participated in exercise Northern Strike at Grayling Army Airfield and Alpena Combat Readiness Training Center in Michigan.Northern Strike is a large-scale exercise coordinated by the Michigan Army National Guard and features Army, Marines and Air Force working together for total force integration. It concludes Aug. 20."A few years ago, the Michigan National Guard decided to build an exercise to train its folks in order to prepare for an upcoming deployment," said Master Sgt. Jeffery Hollaway, the 821st CRG current operations superintendent. "With all of the different services kicking in, the exercise grew. Before long, it became a large-scale exercise with units active, Guard and Reserve participating."With more than 5,000 participants from Michigan, Illinois, Latvia, Canada and Poland, among others, Northern Strike combines air and ground capabilities into a single exercise. It also includes various aircraft, such as the C-130 Hercules, A-10 Thunderbolt II, CH-47 Chinook, AH-64 Apache and the UH-60 Black Hawk.During the exercise, Airmen have a chance to work with rotary wing, turboprop aircraft and practice being outside of their comfort zones."When you are responsible for physically moving people and equipment from place to place, one missed planning detail or failure to understand a process has a ripple effect that can be hard to recover from or at least more work for your team," said Senior Master Sgt. Ricky Smith, the 921st Contingency Response Squadron superintendent and contingency response team chief. "This (training) allows for our Airmen to get outside of their normal functional area to learn and appreciate what their fellow teammates bring to the fight."Northern Strike also provided the opportunity for 821st CRG Airmen to rehearse potential real-world situations by training with Army counterparts in cargo uploading and downloading on aircraft, aircraft engine running off-loads, communications, aerial port procedures and air traffic control.With one team at Grayling Army Airfield and one at Alpena CRTC, the 821st CRG exhibited their capabilities by honing their skills as contingency response Airmen to provide communication, logistical and maintenance support, as well as airfield management."Operating in two locations at once is challenging, but it also provides more opportunities for officers and enlisted to lead people on the road," Smith said. "It also is very realistic for real-world missions where we could be operating at a main base and a forward operating base."Northern Strike 



Contingency response 



Travis AFB 



training 



Michigan 



total force
#### HARRIS *v.*JOHNSON.

Fraudulent Conveyances.

*Marche*v. Johnson, ante, 36, applied and followed.

No. 2254.

Submitted February 10, 1911.

Decided April 3, 1911.

Hearing on an appeal by the defendant from a judgment -of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, on verdict, on an issue made by a claim of title to property seized under a writ of attachment.

*Affirmed.*

*Mr. Louis L. Hamby*and *Mr. Leon Preizfelder*for the appellant.

*Mr. Hayden Johnson*and *Mr. Thomas H. Patterson*for the .appellees.

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the •Court:

This appeal involves the same question as in No. 2254, *Marche*v. *Johnson*[ante, 36], and without printing the record was submitted therewith. For the reasons given in the -opinion in that ease, the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of U.S. Microbics, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Brehm,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, In all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by U.S. Microbics ,
      Inc .
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





February
      20, 2007











/S/
      Robert
      Brehm


Robert
      Brehm


Chief
      Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

ROBIN KASI PAWLAK,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50466

D.C. No. 2:16-cr-00448-R-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 13, 2019** 

Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, FISHER,

*** and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. 

FILED

AUG 30 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable D. Michael Fisher, United States Circuit Judge for the

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation.
Robin Pawlak appeals her seventy-two month sentence following her guilty

pleas to one count of bank robbery and one count of conspiracy to commit bank

robbery. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

1

Although she received a below guidelines sentence, Pawlak argues that the

district court committed reversible procedural error by failing to calculate the

guideline range before it imposed her sentence. Pawlak did not object at the time

of sentencing, so we review for plain error. United States v. Waknine, 543 F.3d

546, 551 (9th Cir. 2008). 

The government concedes that the district court plainly erred in failing to

calculate the guidelines, see United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.

2008) (en banc), but contends that Pawlak fails to establish any prejudice resulting

from the district court’s error. We agree.

It is Pawlak’s burden to “demonstrate ‘a reasonable probability that [she]

would have received a different sentence’ if the district court had not erred.”

United States v. Vargem, 747 F.3d 724, 728 (9th Cir. 2014) (quoting United States

v. Tapia, 665 F.3d 1059, 1061 (9th Cir. 2011)). Here, Pawlak does not dispute the

accuracy of the pre-sentence report’s guideline calculation, and she received a

1 The parties are familiar with the facts and record; we recite them only

as necessary to resolve Pawlak’s appeal. 

2
sentence that was twelve months below the low end of that range. On these facts,

Pawlak has not established the requisite prejudice to merit vacatur of her sentence. 

AFFIRMED.

3
News United States Air Force
 Agility, partnerships highlighted at industry eventPublished Aug. 31, 2015
                        
                        By Kendahl Johnson
                        
                        
                        Kirtland Air Force Base Public Affairs
                **KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE, N.M. (AFNS) --**
                Businesses received insight into more than 400 opportunities worth $12.2 billion at the annual Briefing for Industry Aug. 17-19 in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
BFI provides information to the government contracting community on upcoming and proposed acquisitions from the many and varied federal organizations operating in New Mexico. The event is sponsored by the nonprofit Professional Aerospace Contractors Association of New Mexico, led by Ron Unruh.
"It was a huge success," Unruh said. "It's a very unique event where networking venues are created and there are opportunities for dialogue between companies and those with contract opportunities."
More than 26 federal agencies presented their upcoming opportunities, including small business innovative research projects, broad agency announcements and major acquisitions.
BFI provides a forum for potential bidders to gain knowledge and insight for a successful bid and offers opportunities to speak directly with the presenters about their programs. Air Force Research Laboratory officials called BFI one of the laboratory's key industry outreach events to share a diverse portfolio of opportunities to help address the Air Force's technical challenges.
Maj. Gen. Thomas Masiello, the commander of AFRL at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, and opening keynote speaker, told guests the theme of AFRL's presentations at the event were that the Air Force and the Defense Department needs to do things faster and better than ever before.
"We have to shake things up," he said. "We can no longer be business as usual. Just because we've had technological superiority for the past 20 years doesn't mean that we'll continue to have it."
Masiello said the U.S. is facing competition in research and development from potential adversaries, who have been making progress toward leveling the playing field. Space, cyber and the electromagnetic spectrum are increasingly contested.
"Our enemies have the ability to challenge us in ways that were never possible before," he said. "Our greatest challenge is to be able to respond faster than our adversaries. We have to adapt and be flexible."
The general emphasized partnerships with large and small businesses and universities, and leveraging science and systems engineering as a path to deliver advanced Air Force capabilities while lowering life cycle costs.
There were more than 430 registered attendees at the event, representing 26 different states. Unruh said plans are to continue to grow and expand the annual conference.Kirtland AFB 



AFRL 



Air Force Research Laboratory 



Briefing for Industry
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                         302,955
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,926,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                   600,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,774,807
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,970,607
<PP&E>                                      42,793,944
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,754,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,733,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,029,578
<BONDS>                                     14,349,114
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,002,599
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,743,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,733,015
<SALES>                                     32,735,227
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            32,735,227
<CGS>                                       28,704,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,704,849
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               125,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             760,508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                882,906
<INCOME-TAX>                                   339,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            543,906
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   543,906
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .1
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .1
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 2015 Cooke award nominations soughtPublished Oct. 14, 2014
                        
                        By Janis El Shabazz
                        
                        
                        Air Force Personnel Center Public Affairs
                **JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas  (AFNS) --**
                Air Force officials are seeking nominations for the 11th Annual Defense Department David O. Cooke Excellence in Public Administration award.
This award was created to promote, perpetuate and recognize the type of exceptional contributions Cooke made to the federal service. He had a career that spanned more than 55 years, 45 of which were with the DOD, and he was widely recognized as a public official promoting a cooperative spirit among leaders and improving operations.
The award recognizes non-managerial career civilian employees with 3-10 years of civilian federal career service as of Dec. 31.
Nominees can be from any functional area and will be evaluated on their commitment to public service and demonstration of personal and professional integrity.
Organizations and base-level personnel must contact their major command, combatant command, field operating agency or direct reporting unit for applicable suspense date and additional information regarding nomination procedures.
Each MAJCOM, COCOM, FOA and DRU may submit one nomination. Completed nomination packages are due to the Air Force Personnel Center by Feb. 24, 2015.
For more information about Air Force recognition programs and other personnel issues, visit the myPers website.David O. Cooke Excellence in Public Administration Award 



DOD 



MAJCOM 



COCOM 



FOA 



DRU 



AFPC
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Aug. 23Published Aug. 23, 2016
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Nicholas Koetz
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- On this look around the Air Force big changes are coming for additional duties, Airmen participate in exercise Northern Strike, and B-52 Stratofortresses conduct a ceremonial flyover in Australia. Hosted by Staff Sgt. Nicholas Koetz.
For previous episodes, click here.
Related links:
- AF to reduce additional dutiesATAF 



B-52 



exercise 



additional duty 



Flyover 



Northern Strike 



Australia
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended October 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert N.Wildrick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.
| December 5, 2005 | /s/ ROBERT  N. WILDRICK   |
|-----------------------|---------------------------|
|                  | Robert N. Wildrick        |
|                  | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Andrew F. Puzder, Chief Executive Officer of CKE Restaurants, Inc. (the
Company), certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
May 17, 2004, of the Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and
34-47986];c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls over financial reporting. Date: December 17, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Andrew F. PuzderAndrew F. PuzderChief Executive Officer