alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Quintiles Transnational Corp. and Subsidiaries
Certification Pursuant To
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Dennis B. Gillings, Ph.D., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Quintiles
Transnational Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238
and 34-47986.](c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit




---



##### 



committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date:
    November 12, 2004  /s/ Dennis B. GillingsDennis B. Gillings, Ph.D.
Executive Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SUPERGEN,
INC. JUNE 30, 1998 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,630
<SECURITIES>                                     4,062
<RECEIVABLES>                                      544
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                      1,411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,246
<PP&E>                                           3,843
<DEPRECIATION>                                     584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,697
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,075
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,402
<SALES>                                          1,552
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,552
<CGS>                                              588
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,423
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,922)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,922)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,922)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. JOSE LOPEZ, Defendant - Appellant. No. 16-3120 (D.C. No. 2:07-CR-20122-KHV-2) (D. Kan.)

________________ _________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________ Before HARTZ , O’BRIEN , and PHILLIPS , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ Defendant Jose Lopez appeals the dismissa l by the United States District Court for the District of Kansas of his motion fo r a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Exercising jurisdiction un der 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm. On April 8, 2009, Defendant pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine. Th e district court adopted his presentence report (PSR), which stated that he had been apprehended with 10.62 kilograms of actual methamphetamine. Under the 2009 Sentencing Guidelines the threshold weight of actual

* After examining the briefs and appellate r ecord, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not ma terially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34. 1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judg ment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent w ith Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### November 30, 2016
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court2 methamphetamine required to reach the ma ximum base offense level of 38 was 1.5 kilograms. See USSG § 2D1.1(c)(1) (2009 ). The district court set that offense level and sentenced Defendant to 405 months in prison. Amendment 782 to the United States Se ntencing Guidelines raised to 4.5 kilograms the threshold weight of actual methamphetamine n eeded to reach the maximum base offense level of 38, see USSG § 2D1.1(c)(1) (2014); and Amendment 788 made that change retroactive. Defendant moved for a sentence reduction under those amendments. The district court dismissed fo r lack of jurisdiction because Defendant’s offense level remained the same under the amended guidelines. The dismissal was correct. Amendmen t 782 “did not lower [Defendant’s] sentencing range because his [2009] co nviction involved too much [actual methamphetamine] for him to qualify for relief.” United States v. Gay , 771 F.3d 681, 683 (10th Cir. 2014); see also United States v. Pace , 650 F. App’x 940, 943 (10th Cir. 2016) (denying reduction wh en sentencing court determined that defendant was responsible for sufficient drug quantity that gu idelines amendment di d not reduce offense level (and hence did not reduce his guidelines sentencing range)). Because Defendant’s sentencing range was not lowe red by Amendment 7 82, he is not entitled to relief. We AFFIRM. Mr. Lopez’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Entered for the Court

Harris L Hartz Circuit Judge
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H5386-H5387]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

          TIME FOR AN OUTSIDE COUNSEL IN SPEAKER'S ETHICS CASE

  (Mr. BONIOR asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute.)
  Mr. BONIOR. Mr. Speaker, why is the Ethics Committee making the 
special exception in the case of Speaker Newt Gingrich?
  In every single high-profile ethics case since 1979, both the 
Democrats and the Republicans on the committee have voted to appoint an 
outside counsel. But last Sunday, according to the Washington Post, all 
five Republican members of the Ethics Committee broke with 15 years of 
bipartisan tradition and voted to make a special exception for Newt 
Gingrich and block an outside counsel. [[Page H5387]] 
  Mr. Speaker, these are all honorable people caught in a difficult 
position because they all have close personal ties to the Speaker. Mr. 
Speaker, the Ethics Committee has had this since last December. It will 
never get resolved any other way.
  It is not just Dave Bonior and others here who are calling for it. 
Public Citizen, the New York Times, Richard Phelan, Roll Call, Robert 
Scheer in the L.A. Times, Al Hunter in the Wall Street Journal, Common 
Cause, the Hartford Courant, the San Francisco Chronicle, the list goes 
on and on. The Atlanta Constitution, his home newspaper. All have 
called for an independent outside counsel. It is time that we had one.

                          ____________________
```
583 A.2d 316

#### NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. J.B. IN THE MATTER OF J.B., A MINOR.

January 29, 1990.

Leave to appeal granted.
#### Wyatt *v.*Thompson, Etc. et al.

[No. 19,250.

Filed December 3, 1958.]

*127*C. Wendell Martin, Bredell, Cooper & Martin,*all of Indianapolis, and *Claud D. Raber,*of Danville, for appellant.

*William M. Osborn, Bingham, Summers & Spilman,*both of Indianapolis, *Joe Stevenson*and *Stevenson, Kendall & Stevenson,*of Danville, of counsel, for appellee Charles Thompson.

On Motion to Dismiss.

Royse, C. J.

The appellee Thompson brought this action against appellant and appellee Disney for damages as a result of an automobile collision between a car driven by appellant and one driven by appellee Disney.

The complaint was in two paragraphs, both of which averred said Thompson was riding as a guest in the automobile being operated by Shirley Cline (now Wyatt). The first paragraph then charged said Wyatt with wanton and wilful misconduct in the operation of said automobile. The second paragraph charged appellee with negligence in the operation of the car he was driving.

Trial to a jury resulted in a verdict for $12,500.00 in favor of Thompson against appellant, and found for appellee Disney against appellee Thompson. Judgment accordingly.

Appellee Disney has filed his motion to dismiss this appeal as to him. The motion in addition to the facts set out above avers, in substance, neither party filed a motion for a new trial against him; that he is *128neither a necessary nor proper party to this appeal; he has no interest in the outcome of this appeal; the judgment was final as to him; that all issues as to him, appellee Disney, and appellant were finally disposed of in the trial court.

This motion was filed in the office of the clerk of this court October 30, 1958. Neither appellant nor appellee have in any manner opposed the granting of this motion.

We are of the opinion the motion should be sustained. It is therefore ordered that this appeal as to said appellee Disney be dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 154 N. E. 2d 122.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LEONIDES GARCIA.

February 28, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
583 A.2d 342

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RAYMOND HOCUTT.

March 20, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: AWACS Replacement, Reproductive Health Policies, African Air Chiefs SymposiumPublished March 10, 2023
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Kahdija Slaughter
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, a new prototype Airborne Battle Management aircraft is ordered, the Air Force announces new privacy protections for pregnant Airmen and policies for non-covered reproductive health care, and U.S. Air Forces Africa sponsors a meeting of African Air Chiefs. (Hosted by Tech. Sgt. Brittan Crolley)   For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Related links:**- Air Force awards E-7A prototype contract****- DAF establishes policies to increase access to non-covered reproductive health care****- 37 African nations, US kickoff AACS 2023 in Senegal**Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV 



Command and Control 



tactical battle management 



2022 NDS 



National Defense Strategy 



E-7A 



E-3 Sentry 



moving target indication platform 



readiness 



reproductive health care 



policy update 



DOD 



administrative leave policy 



pregnancy 



health care 



Air Force Medical Service 



AFMS 



DAF 



CSAF 



U.S. Air Forces Africa 



U.S. Air Forces Europe 



African Air Chiefs Symposium
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1215 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1215

 To authorize the Secretary of Energy to make certain loan guarantees 
for advanced conservation and fuel efficiency motor vehicle technology 
                               projects.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2007

    Mr. Rogers of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
      the Committee on Science and Technology, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of Energy to make certain loan guarantees 
for advanced conservation and fuel efficiency motor vehicle technology 
                               projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY.

    Section 1703 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16513) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Fuel Efficient Vehicle Projects.--The Secretary shall make 
guarantees under this title to motor vehicle manufacturers and 
suppliers in the United States for advanced conservation and fuel 
efficiency motor vehicle technology projects for the production of new 
motor vehicles that do not exceed 10,000 lbs. gross vehicle weight, 
including gasoline and diesel vehicles, flexible fuel vehicles, and 
hybrid electric vehicles, that reduce dependence on oil and the 
emissions of one or more greenhouse gases.''.

SEC. 2. AMOUNT.

    Section 1702(c) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 
16512(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``In the case 
of advanced conservation and fuel efficiency motor vehicle technology 
projects under section 1703(f), the aggregate amount of guarantees 
under this title shall not exceed $20,000,000,000.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
     PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May
17, 2004, of CKE Restaurants, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Theodore Abajian,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section
            78m(a) or Section 780(d)); and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      In witness whereof, the undersigned has executed and delivered this
certificate as of the date set forth opposite his signature below.

Date: June 22, 2004                       /s/ Theodore Abajian
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Theodore Abajian
                                          Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40240

Summary Calendar

RONNIE ARTURO GODOY,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

F. LARA, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:16-CV-493

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

As a result of prison officials finding that he failed a drug test while on 

home confinement release, Ronnie Arturo Godoy, federal prisoner # 59771-008, 

was reincarcerated and lost a one-year credit he had received for completing 

an in-custody drug treatment program. Godoy filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition 

challenging the result of his disciplinary hearing and a subsequent rehearing. 

The district court determined that summary judgment for the respondent was 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 15, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40240 Document: 00514957883 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/15/2019
No. 18-40240

2

appropriate given that Godoy failed to exhaust his claims through the Bureau 

of Prison’s (BOP) administrative remedy program, notwithstanding Godoy’s

argument that an exception to the exhaustion requirement applied. Therefore, 

the court dismissed the petition. Godoy appeals. He also moves to file an outof-time reply brief.

“This [c]ourt must examine the basis of its jurisdiction,” including 

whether Godoy’s appeal is moot. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 

1987); see United States v. Heredia-Holguin, 823 F.3d 337, 340 (5th Cir. 2016) 

(en banc). Godoy’s § 2241 petition challenges the basis for his reincarceration 

and seeks, as a remedy, his release from custody and the reinstatement of his 

sentence credit. The BOP website shows that Godoy was released from custody 

during the pendency of this appeal. See United States v. Booker, 645 F.3d 328, 

328 (5th Cir. 2011) (per curiam); Shokeh v. Thompson, 375 F.3d 351, 351-52 

(5th Cir. 2004). Thus, even if he prevails on the merits, this court is unable to 

grant Godoy any effective relief. See Heredia-Holguin, 823 F.3d at 340. 

Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal as moot, and we DENY the motion for 

leave to file an out-of-time reply brief.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED.

 Case: 18-40240 Document: 00514957883 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/15/2019
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Globetel Communications Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Thomas Y. Jimenez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.       the Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






Thomas Y. Jimenez
Chief Financial Officer
May 17, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1206 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1206

    To name the Logistics Automation Training Facility of the Army 
  Quartermaster Center and School at Fort Lee, Virginia, in honor of 
  General Richard H. Thompson, who is the only quartermaster to have 
                  risen from private to full general.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2007

  Mr. Forbes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To name the Logistics Automation Training Facility of the Army 
  Quartermaster Center and School at Fort Lee, Virginia, in honor of 
  General Richard H. Thompson, who is the only quartermaster to have 
                  risen from private to full general.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAMING OF LOGISTICS AUTOMATION TRAINING FACILITY, ARMY 
              QUARTERMASTER CENTER AND SCHOOL, FORT LEE, VIRGINIA, IN 
              HONOR OF GENERAL RICHARD H. THOMPSON, THE ONLY 
              QUARTERMASTER TO HAVE RISEN FROM PRIVATE TO FULL GENERAL.

    The Logistics Automation Training Facility of the Army 
Quartermaster Center and School at Fort Lee, Virginia shall be known 
and designated as the ``General Richard H. Thompson Logistics 
Automation Training Facility''. Any reference in a law, map, 
regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to 
such facility shall be deemed to be a reference to the General Richard 
H. Thompson Logistics Automation Training Facility.
                                 <all>
```