alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

I, James S.J. Manuso, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SuperGen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of SuperGen, Inc.

By:

/s/JAMES S.J. MANUSOName:

James S.J. ManusoTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


I,
Michael Molkentin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
SuperGen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
SuperGen, Inc.

By:

/s/MICHAEL MOLKENTINName:

Michael MolkentinTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1080

AN ACT

To modify the boundaries of Grand Teton National Park 

to include certain land within the GT Park Subdivision, 

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1080 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Grand Teton National 

3 Park Extension Act of 2007’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 In this Act: 

6 (1) PARK.—The term ‘‘Park’’ means the Grand 

7 Teton National Park. 

8 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

9 the Secretary of the Interior. 

10 (3) SUBDIVISION.—The term ‘‘Subdivision’’ 

11 means the GT Park Subdivision, with an area of ap12 proximately 49.67 acres, as generally depicted on—

13 (A) the plat recorded in the Office of the 

14 Teton County Clerk and Recorder on December 

15 16, 1997, numbered 918, entitled ‘‘Final Plat 

16 GT Park Subdivision’’, and dated June 18, 

17 1997; and 

18 (B) the map entitled ‘‘2006 Proposed 

19 Grand Teton Boundary Adjustment’’, numbered 

20 136/80,198, and dated March 21, 2006, which 

21 shall be on file and available for inspection in 

22 appropriate offices of the National Park Serv23 ice. 
3

•HR 1080 EH

1 SEC. 3. ACQUISITION OF LAND. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may accept from 

3 any willing donor the donation of any land or interest in 

4 land of the Subdivision. 

5 (b) ADMINISTRATION.—On acquisition of land or an 

6 interest in land under subsection (a), the Secretary shall—

7 (1) include the land or interest in the bound8 aries of the Park; and 

9 (2) administer the land or interest as part of 

10 the Park, in accordance with all applicable laws (in11 cluding regulations). 

12 (c) DEADLINE FOR ACQUISITION.—It is the intent of 

13 Congress that the acquisition of land or an interest in land 

14 under subsection (a) be completed not later than 1 year 

15 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

16 (d) RESTRICTION ON TRANSFER.—The Secretary 

17 shall not donate, sell, exchange, or otherwise transfer any 

18 land acquired under this section without express author19 ization from Congress. 
4

•HR 1080 EH

1 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sec3 retary such sums as are necessary to carry out this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 2007. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1080

AN ACT

To modify the boundaries of Grand Teton National 

Subdivision, and for other purposes.Park to include certain land within the GT Park
No. 87-6556.

#### Hopkins *v.*Office of Personnel Management.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
News United States Air Force
 Hagel: Monitoring returning troops provides 'safety valve'Published Oct. 29, 2014
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Jake Richmond
                        
                        
                        DoD News, Defense Media Activity
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                A 21-day monitoring period for U.S. service members returning from areas affected by Ebola in West Africa provides a margin of safety that troops and their families wanted, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said here Oct. 29.
During an interview at the Washington Ideas Forum here, Hagel said the policy he signed this morning was "discussed in great detail by the communities, by the families of our military men and women," who very much wanted a "safety valve" in place. 
The order implements a recommendation from the Joint Chiefs of Staff to place all U.S. military service members returning from Operation United Assistance into a 21-day controlled monitoring regimen. It applies to all military services contributing personnel to the fight against Ebola at its source, Pentagon Press Secretary Navy Rear Adm. John Kirby said in a statement. **Review required within 45 days**
Hagel's directive to the Joint Chiefs also stipulates that they provide operational specifics for the program within 15 days and a review of the new regimen within 45 days. The review will take into account what officials learn and observe from the initial waves of personnel returning from Operation United Assistance, and will result in a recommendation on whether the controlled monitoring should continue, Kirby said. 
"The secretary believes these initial steps are prudent, given the large number of military personnel transiting from their home base and West Africa and the unique logistical demands and impact this deployment has on the force," the press secretary said. "The secretary's highest priority is the safety and security of our men and women in uniform and their families."Humanitarian 



operations 



safety 



health 



Africa 



Ebola Related Links
        Ramstein Airmen support Ebola fight, mitigate risks at home
                                Oct. 22, 2014
                                As service members travel to Africa in support of Operation United Assistance, Ramstein Air Base here continues to establish itself as a power projection platform for Europe and Africa.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF THE LICENSE OF VEERABHADRA RAU ALURI, M.D., TO PRACTICE MEDICINE AND SURGERY IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY.

January 17, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### ALFRED P. ACQUILINO v. THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF SEA GIRT.

March 13, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Reporting Harassment, DoD Housing Survey, Jolly Green IIPublished Oct. 21, 2022
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Milton Hamilton
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)    --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, new reporting options for sexual harassment victims, the annual Department of Defense housing survey is out, and the HH-60W Jolly Green II helicopter reaches initial operational capability. (Hosted by Senior Airman Garrett Hess)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- B New reporting options for sexual harassment victims****- Annual DoD Housing Survey for privatized housing tenants begins Oct. 17****- HH-60W reaches initial operational capability**Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5502]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

  Mr. ROGERS. Mr. Chairman, on rollcall No. 350, I was unavoidably 
detained. Had I been present, I would have voted ``aye.''
  The CHAIRMAN. The Committee will rise informally in order that the 
House may receive a message.

                          ____________________
```
News United States Air Force
 Doolittle Tokyo Raiders receive Congressional Gold MedalPublished April 16, 2015
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Torri Ingalsbe
                        
                        
                        Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs Command Information
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Leaders from the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate presented the Congressional Gold Medal to the Doolittle Tokyo Raiders April 15 at the U.S. Capitol Visitor’s Center Emancipation Hall.
The medal, created by the U.S. Mint, is the highest civilian honor Congress can give on behalf of the American people.
“We want to thank Congress for enacting and presenting the Congressional Gold Medal to the Tokyo Raiders this day,” said retired Lt. Col. Richard “Dick” E. Cole, one of the two remaining Raiders. “We are honored to accept this prestigious and most appreciated award.”
Seventy-three years ago, 80 men achieved the unimaginable when they took off from an aircraft carrier on a top secret mission to bomb Japan. These men, led by Lt. Col. James H. “Jimmy” Doolittle, came to be known as the Doolittle Tokyo Raiders.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, Sen. Sherrod Brown, and Congressman Pete Olson presented the medal, and Lt. Gen. John “Jack” Hudson, the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force director, accepted the medal on behalf of the Raiders.
“If here, the Raiders would tell you that they just wanted to help out with our nation’s war effort,” Hudson said. “The Doolittle Raiders’ service model of excellence ... is an inspiration for all of today’s military.”
On April 18, the 73rd anniversary of the raid, the medal will be presented to the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force by Cole, a co-pilot of Crew No. 1, during a ceremony at the museum. The other surviving Raider, Staff Sgt. David J. Thatcher, an engineer-gunner of Crew No. 7, is also planning to attend.congressional gold medal 



Doolittle Tokyo Raiders 



Congress
#### Samuel Morris v. W. L. Edwards.

(No. —, Op. Book No. 1, p. 516.)

Appeal from Anderson County.'

October 12, 1878.

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 525. *Appeal bond; must state names of all parties to the judgment appealed from. The*judgment rendered in the court below was against Samuel Morris, as principal, and J. M. Hughes and Ira Williams, as his sureties. The appeal bond describes the judgment as one rendered against Samuel Morris. *Held,*an appeal bond should give the names of all the parties to the judgment appealed from. If any are omitted, the judgment is misdescribed. [Jenkins v. McNeese, 34 Tex. 189.]

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1130]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

           THE HOMELESS AND COMMUNITY COOPERATION ACT OF 1995

                                 ______

                            HON. LINDA SMITH

                             of washington

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, May 24, 1995
  Mrs. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Speaker, today, I am introducing the 
``Community and Homeless Cooperation Act of 1995'' which will amend the 
McKinney Homeless Assistance Act.
  The Act was originally designed to make under-utilized or unutilized 
Federal buildings available for sheltering our Nation's homeless. In 
Olympia, one of the largest cities in my district, there were plans to 
make a vacant and dilapidated Federal building into a large shelter for 
the homeless yet over 30 percent of the beds for the homeless in 
Olympia's existing shelters went unused. Common sense would dictate 
that we didn't need another shelter, we needed additional resources for 
outreach and services for existing shelters.
  Recently, Thurston County commissioners in my home State of 
Washington pointed out to me in a recent letter, ``With the current 
`use it or lose it rule', a social service agency has a difficult time 
saying ``no'' to a free building--even one requiring extensive and 
expensive upgrades.'' My legislation will allow these buildings to be 
sold and a portion of the money used to help existing shelters meet 
their daily funding needs while the remainder will be returned to the 
Federal treasury exclusively to reduce the deficit. And, for the first 
time in the 7-year life of this legislation, the homeless and the 
community will have a voice in the selection of buildings to be used. 
As the Olympian, newspaper stated, ``* * * location of these services 
is key.''
  The Community and Homeless Cooperation Act of 1995 gives a city and 
its homeless a sense of community and cooperation in determining what 
is in their best interest. Through community forums to determine 
building placement or through making proceeds from sales of these 
buildings available to increase homeless assistance services on Main 
Street, we empower the people on Main Street, homeless and homeowner 
alike.

                          ____________________
```
#### State ex. rel. Russell, Administrator *v.*Criss, Judge etc.

[No. 19,350.

Filed September 18, 1959.]

*10
      *Johnston & Mankin,*of Terre Haute, for relators.

*Buena*Chaney, of Terre Haute, for respondent.

Myers, P. J.

This is an original action by the State of Indiana on Relation of Robert L. Russell, Administrator of the Estate of John Luther Waugh, Deceased, and Clara May Waugh, Plaintiff, against Herbert R. C-riss, Judge of the Vigo Circuit Court, Defendant, for a writ of mandate and prohibition to stay the execution of a judgment entered in the Probate Division of the Vigo Circuit Court on April 20, 1959. Relators filed their petition on July 1, 1959, as an original action in this court, in which they asked for a temporary writ of mandate and prohibition. A temporary writ was issued, and it was ordered that the respondent show cause on or before the 18th day of July, 1959, why the writ should not be made permanent.

On July 17, 1959, respondent filed his verified return to the temporary writ, showing the court reasons in law and fact why the writ should be dissolved.

This case having come before the court for consideration, it is now determined that the temporary writ heretofore issued is dissolved and a permanent writ is denied.

Note. — Reported in 160 N. E. 2d 889.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4676]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                      PROTECT AMERICAN AGRICULTURE

  (Mr. NETHERCUTT asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. NETHERCUTT. Mr. Speaker, we have many tough choices to make 
during the next several weeks and Republicans have been the first to 
come forward and face these challenges. But we need to take great care 
in reducing those programs that have had such a profound effect on our 
rural communities over the last 60 years. America's rural communities 
are fading examples of American history--neighbor helping neighbor, 
family helping family.
  We cannot turn back 60 years of farm programs overnight and expect 
our rural communities to survive. Farm communities can survive through 
tax and regulatory relief, farm program reform and better trade policy 
reform. Remember, farm programs have declined an average of 9 percent 
each year since 1985--a reduction of over $15 billion. If all other 
Federal programs had taken the same budget reductions during this 
period, our budget would balance. Assaults on agriculture are not 
productive, so I challenge my colleagues to roll up our sleeves and 
learn how important farming is to America.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,672
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     22,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,257
<PP&E>                                          10,368
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,913
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,537
<OTHER-SE>                                         359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,331
<SALES>                                         39,997
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,758
<CGS>                                           24,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,356
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,873
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Innovation is key to stabilizing the PacificPublished Sept. 17, 2014
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Torri Ingalsbe
                        
                        
                        Air Force Public Affairs Agency, Operating Location-P
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The only way to continue forward is through innovation, Gen. Hawk Carlisle, commander of the Pacific Air Forces Command, said during a speech at the 2014 Air Force Association’s Air & Space Conference and Technology Exposition, Washington D.C., Sept. 16.
“You need only look at the papers or the news today and everybody realizes the world that we face in respect to adversaries and challenges,” Carlisle said. “The way to get through this is through innovation.”
The PACAF strategy is a three-pronged approach of expanding engagement, increasing combat capability and improving warfighter integration to satisfy the needs and requirements from the U.S. and its allies.
“It’s not earth-shattering,” Carlisle said. “But it’s the kinds of things we do day in and day out in support of the [combatant commander] out in the Pacific to get the mission done that he’s asking us to do.”
The general noted challenges, but also the new and different ways PACAF Airmen are meeting those challenges.
“Today we have significantly more mission than we have money, manpower or time,” Carlisle said. “I want every Pacific Airman to go and do the next most important thing for the warfighter, not the next thing in his inbox.”
He explained that thinking about tactics, techniques and procedures in a different way, and using existing equipment in a different way, helps meet the challenges of an every-changing fiscal and geopolitical environment.
“We owe that to the American people, that the very next dollar we spend is an increase in combat capability for our force,” Carlisle said. “We have a moral obligation to this nation to produce the very best Air Force we can produce, given the resources they give us.”
He highlighted stories of PACAF Airmen, who are leading the charge with innovative ideas and dedication to the mission.
“Our resilient Airmen are absolutely incredible,” he said. “We don’t have enough of them, but they are amazing. We’re doing everything in our power to make sure we’re taking care of our Airmen. They’re the ones who make the mission happen, they’re the ones who are going to make us successful, they’re the ones who are going to innovate and find ways to solve the problems that we have.”Air Force Association 



Air & Space Conference 



PACAF 



 



AFA
762 A.2d 1081

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Petitioner, v. Ursula Lisbeth HOOK, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Nov. 1, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Commonwealth Court is reversed and the case is remanded for proceedings consistent with *Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation v. McCafferty,*563 Pa. 146, 758 A.2d 1155 (2000).
[No. 23193-0-II.

Division Two.

April 14, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Anibal Valentin-Santiago, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 98-1-00099-3, Stephen M. Warning, J., entered April 16, 1998. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Houghton and Bridgewater, JJ.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **1 -**  **241 1** 

EDDIE LAREECE PITTMAN ,
P laintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

ARCHER WESTERN CONTRACTORS; JOHN B. MCCUBBIN; REGGINALD CAMPBELL , Defendant s
- Appellee s .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the West ern District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Max O. Cogburn, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3 :11

- cv
- 00 5 56

- MAC

- DSC )

Submitted : April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Eddie LaReece Pittman , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Eddie LaReece Pittman appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (200 6 ). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Pittman v. Archer W. Contractors , No.

3:11

- cv
- 00556

- MOC

- DSC (W.D.N .C. Nov. 28, 2011) . We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED