alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 44 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. J. RES. 44

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2007

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 
       Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003, and for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RENEWAL OF IMPORT RESTRICTIONS UNDER BURMESE FREEDOM AND 
              DEMOCRACY ACT OF 2003.

    Congress approves the renewal of import restrictions contained in 
section 3(a)(1) of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003.

SEC. 2. MERCHANDISE PROCESSING FEES.

    Section 13031(j)(3)(A) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(j)(3)(A)) is amended by 
striking ``October 14, 2014'' and inserting ``October 21, 2014''.

SEC. 3. TIME FOR PAYMENT OF CORPORATE ESTIMATED TAXES.

    Subparagraph (B) of section 401(1) of the Tax Increase Prevention 
and Reconciliation Act of 2005 is amended by striking ``114.50 
percent'' and inserting ``114.75 percent''.

SEC. 4. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    This joint resolution shall be deemed to be a ``renewal 
resolution'' for purposes of section 9 of the Burmese Freedom and 
Democracy Act of 2003.

SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This joint resolution and the amendments made by this joint 
resolution shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this joint 
resolution or July 26, 2007, whichever occurs first.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.

                               By Deborah M. Spriggs,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
422 A.2d 1165

#### Commonwealth, Appellant, v. Stevens, a/k/a Sloan.

Submitted September 15, 1978.

Henry S. Perkin, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellant; Gerald I. Roth, for appellee.

Before VAN der VOORT, WATKINS and MONTGOMERY, JJ.

Order affirmed.
News United States Air Force
 K-9 remains resilient, bonds with handlerPublished April 19, 2016
                        
                        By Senior Airman Erin Trower
                        
                        
                        48th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **ROYAL AIR FORCE LAKENHEATH, England (AFNS)  --**
                Only months after recovering from hip dysplasia, Gina, an 8-year-old military working dog at Royal Air Force Lakenheath was diagnosed with yet another ailment. In February, a cancerous tumor was discovered on her mouth.Gina's handler, Senior Airman Bryce Bates, a 48th Security Forces Squadron MWD handler, ensured Gina wasn't alone during her next battle of medical procedures. Bates and Gina had an immediate bond once they became teammates in October.Bates stayed by Gina's side as she underwent anesthesia to have the tumor removed in March and faithfully waited at the veterinary clinic until she woke up 3 1/2 hours later."I wanted to be there for her because she would be there for me," Bates said. "I wanted to hear it firsthand if anything went wrong."While Gina was in remission, Bates spent the next three weeks exercising, feeding and caring for her, until she made a full recovery and was able to return to work.Gina is known throughout the squadron for her gentle disposition and pleasing demeanor. Bates claims she has the perfect balance between a house and working dog."She is super friendly for a working dog," Bates said. "She has the aggression and dedication for work, but she really just wants to please."Bates further bonds with Gina by celebrating her birthdays, cake and hat included, dressing her up for the holidays, and taking her on sight-seeing trips to London."When it's time for her to quit, she will be adopted for sure," Bates said. "I hope I can take her with me. It would be great to have a dog like her."The career expectancy of MWDs depends on their health and ability to carry on their mission requirements. For the time being, Gina is in good health and will continue to serve at RAF Lakenheath until the time to retire arrives.RAF Lakenheath 



MWD 



security forces 



USAFE 



SFS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey M. Nigl, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of
Electronic Tele-Communications, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Electronic
Tele-Communications, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 8, 2003



/s/ Jeffrey M. Nigl
-------------------
Jeffrey M. Nigl
Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 72 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6129]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                               NOMINATION

  Executive nomination received by the Senate May 3, 1995:
                          department of state

       Timothy Michael Carney, of Washington, a Career Member of 
     the Senior Foreign Service, Class of Counselor, to be 
     Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the United 
     States of America to the Republic of Sudan.
     

                          ____________________
```
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# DOD, AF leaders look to F-35 maintainers for help

              - Published  June 14, 2014
              -                             By Amaani Lyle                                                    
              - American Forces Press Service

**WASHINGTON (AFNS) --  **
The Pentagon will continue to seek aircraft maintainer suggestions and industry partner investments to reduce operating and sustainment costs by 10 to 20 percent as F-35 Lightning II joint strike fighter improvements develop, the undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics said June 12, in a conference call with reporters

Frank Kendall and Air Force Lt. Gen. Christopher C. Bogdan, F-35 Lightning II program executive officer, said they’ll ask for maintainer input to reduce downtime and look to industry to improve reliability and retain air dominance over competing nations.

The cost reductions, Kendall said, will be ongoing and will draw from a number of sources, to build on the F-35’s capabilities.

 “I don’t think that’s an unrealistic target, ... but I think doing everything we can to get as close to that as possible is absolutely the right course for us,” he said.Kendall explained the F-35 is designed for upgrades, including electronic warfare and processing capabilities. “We’re starting to do some follow-on development, and we need to thinking now about the requirements for the next block of software,” the undersecretary said.

 Bodgan lauded aircraft maintainers, who offer myriad suggestions for ways to reduce overall costs. “The maintainers are a critical source of really good practical ways of doing business,” he said, “and we’ve got to integrate that into the program.”

 He explained that maintainers have suggested ways to streamline even simple procedures such as having to check the oil on every flight. For example, maintainers indicated that manually correcting warning systems and updating maintenance records could reduce time on the ground and yield efficiencies.

 "We have now been able to, through engineering analysis and working with the engine manufacturers, take that requirement to only every 10 hours,” the general said.

 Bogdan also noted that the Air Force’s average F-35 downtime between flights was 4.5 hours last year and three hours this year, with even shorter down time projected for next year.

 As Pentagon officials continue to compare DOD progress with that of the Chinese J-20 and J-31 stealth aircraft and their other capabilities, Kendall reported that he commissioned the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency for its air dominance initiative a year ago. The program, he said, helps the Pentagon assess whether or not to take a “system of systems” approach in aircraft improvements and better analyze how those systems network together.

 “We need to start thinking now about the requirements for the next blocks of software ... after the things that are currently in Block 4,” Kendall said. “This is a game that never ends. You have to stay ahead, and there are competitors out there you have to worry about.”

maintainerscost-savingsdowntimeF-35
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 08

- 00124

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

CLAUDE KEITH THOMAS AND PATRICIA ANN THO MAS

,

From the 378th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 52679CC

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Clerk of this Cou rt notified the parties that the appellant’s brief was overdue

in this cause and that the appeal may be dismissed if an appropriate response was not

filed within twenty

- one days. No response has been received. Accordingly, the appeal

is dismissed for wan t of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3.

FELIPE REYNA

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Vance, and

Justice Reyna

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed November 19, 2008

[CV06]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Development—2 Study Section, October 7, 2010, 8 a.m. to October 8, 2010, 5 p.m., The River Inn, 924 25th Street, NW., Washington,                           ( print page 56554)                        DC 20037 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 31, 2010, 75 FR 53317-53319.                

The meeting will be one day only October 7, 2010, from 8 a.m., to 6 p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

                        Dated:                         *September 10, 2010.*

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-23148 Filed 9-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
422 A.2d 1167

#### Commonwealth v. Belcher, Appellant.

*631Submitted March 23, 1979.

George E. Lepley, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellant; William S. Kieser, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, SPAETH and LIPEZ, JJ.

Order affirmed.

SPAETH, J., concurred in the result.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
              NATIONAL DIVERSIFIED SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                      EXHIBIT 27 - Financial Statement Data


     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND UNAUDITED STATEMENT
OF  OPERATIONS  FOR THE SIX MONTHS  ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 258,728
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       260,597
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         260,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  190,258
<BONDS>                                                260,597
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               6,554
<OTHER-SE>                                             190,258
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           260,597
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       6,349
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       7,342
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (993)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (993)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (993)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.00


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of China
Cable and  Communication,  Inc. (the  "Company")  for the quarter ended June 30,
2005, I,  Yau-Sing  Tang,  the Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to the  best  of the  undersigned
knowledge and belief:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Date: August 17, 2005                   /s/ Yau-Sing Tang
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Yau-Sing Tang
                                        Chief Financial Officer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 104 

To require assurances that certain family planning service projects and programs will provide pamphlets containing the contact information of adoption centers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require assurances that certain family planning service 

projects and programs will provide pamphlets containing 

the contact information of adoption centers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be referred to as the ‘‘Adoption Infor5 mation Act’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 104 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVISION IN FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES OF 

2 PAMPHLETS CONTAINING ADOPTION CENTER 

3 CONTACT INFORMATION. 

4 Title X of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 300 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘ADOPTION CENTER CONTACT INFORMATION

8 ‘‘SEC. 1009. (a) A grant may be made or contract 

9 entered into under section 1001 for a family planning 

10 service project or program only upon assurances satisfac11 tory to the Secretary that the project or program will— 

12 ‘‘(1) provide to each person to whom the project 

13 or program provides family planning services, at the 

14 time the person inquires about the services, a pam15 phlet that contains— 

16 ‘‘(A) a comprehensive list of the adoption 

17 centers located in the State where the services 

18 are provided; and 

19 ‘‘(B) the address and telephone number of 

20 each such center; 

21 ‘‘(2) at the same time, orally inform each such 

22 person that the pamphlet— 

23 ‘‘(A) was provided by the Department of 

24 Health and Human Services; and 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•HR 104 IH

1 ‘‘(B) contains a comprehensive list of the 

2 adoption centers located in the State where the 

3 services are provided; and 

4 ‘‘(3) provide each such person an opportunity to 

5 read the pamphlet. 

6 ‘‘(b) The Secretary shall prepare, annually update, 

7 and distribute to each project or program referred to in 

8 subsection (a) pamphlets described in that subsection. 

9 ‘‘(c) No funds may be used to carry out this section, 

10 except funds that are appropriated to carry out this title.’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
Exhibit 33.6



|     |  |                                     
|---- |  | ------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | 1 Corelogic Drive Westlake, TX 76262

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

This Annual Assessment as to Compliance is issued pursuant to the Master 3rdParty Supplier Agreement dated as of November 18, 2005 (together with all Statements of Work and amendments
thereto, the Agreement), between Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Company) and CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (CoreLogic).

I, Vicki Chenault, the Senior Vice President of CoreLogic, certify to Company, with the knowledge and intent that it will rely upon this certification, that:

(1) I have reviewed: (i) the servicer compliance certification of CoreLogic provided in accordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB (the
Compliance Certification); (ii) the report on assessment of CoreLogics compliance with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB applicable to CoreLogic (the Applicable Servicing
Criteria) provided in accordance with Rules 13a-18 or 15d-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) Item 1122 of Regulation AB (the Servicing Assessment); and (iii) the
registered public accounting firms attestation report provided in accordance with Rules 13a-18 or 15d-18 under the Exchange Act and Section 1122(b) of Regulation AB (the Attestation Report), and all servicing reports,
officers certificates and other information relating to the servicing of the mortgage loans by CoreLogic during 2012 that were delivered by CoreLogic to Company pursuant to the Agreement (collectively, the CoreLogic Servicing
Information);

(2) Based on my knowledge, all of CoreLogic Servicing Information required to be provided by CoreLogic under the Agreement
has been provided to Company;

(3) I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by CoreLogic as servicer under the Agreement, and
based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the Compliance Certification and except as disclosed in the Compliance Certification, the Servicing Assessment, and the Attestation Report, CoreLogic has fulfilled its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects; and

(4) The Compliance Certification required to be delivered by CoreLogic, and the
Servicing Assessment and Attestation Report required to be provided by CoreLogic have been provided to Company. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports, if any, have been disclosed to Company. Any material instances of
noncompliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria, if any, have been disclosed in such reports.

CORELOGIC COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES,
INC.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Vicki Chenault   
|Vicki Chenault       
|Senior Vice President
|February 6, 2013