alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANT'S  FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,456,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  406,959
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    312,397
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,222,923
<PP&E>                                         237,627
<DEPRECIATION>                               (222,700)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,240,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          135,369
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                    21,136,318
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                (18,039,737)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,240,350
<SALES>                                         72,247
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,699
<CGS>                                            1,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  189,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (83,133)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       174
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (83,307)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (83,307)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
# News

## U.S. Air Force LogoUnited States Air Force

# Air University opens new Civilian Leadership Development School 

              - Published  March 9, 2022
              -                             By Staff Sgt. Lauren Silverthorne                                                    
              - Air University Public Affairs

**MAXWELL AIR FOR BASE, Ala. (AFNS)  --  **

The Civilian Leadership Development School officially activated as a named activity within the **Ira C. Eaker Center for Leadership Development** at **Air University** March 2, accelerating the focus on civilian-centric professional education across the Air Force. 

“Air University long has promoted civilian development, but our efforts have been spread across various institutes with other primary missions,” said **Lt. Gen. James B. Hecker**, Air University commander and president. “Our establishment of the Civilian Leadership Development School marks the Air Force’s full commitment to focus on civilian Airman.” 

The CLDS offers various levels of development courses, including foundational, basic, intermediate and advanced. This training can be used to support an employee’s Individual Development Plan. 

Unlike other Department of Defense civilian development opportunities, the CLDS is unique in that it provides Air Force-specific education. 

“We are the only school for civilians that offers a civilian undergraduate degree, an associate degree in leadership and management,” said Barry Waite, CLDS director. 

The designation of a separate school provides an enterprise-wide approach to civilian leadership development, and in turn, helps the Air Force meet federal guidelines in training, leadership development and succession management. This will help ensure federally mandated new employee, supervisory and managerial training requirements are met, and through the Civilian Associate Degree Program, develops civilian Airmen for future roles and professional military education opportunities. 

“At all levels of leadership, our civilian force is vital to getting the mission accomplished,” Hecker said. “CLDS elevates leadership and professional education on par with our officer and enlisted force.” 

For more information, visit the CLDS website **here**. 

AFWNUSAFAFAir ForceMaxwell AFBAUAir Universitycivilianleadershipdevelopmentschoolmodernizationeducation
#### RICHARD CREMA v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE HISTORIC SMITHVILLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY.

March 19, 1984.

Cross-petition for certification denied. (See 192 *N.J.Super.*505)
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T KA NA Y MUB I T A, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. L A T A H C O U N T Y J A I L E R S ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 35965 D . C . N o . 1 : 0 7 -cv -0 0 0 6 2 -E JL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

I da ho E dw a r d J . L odge , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. K anayM ub i t a, an Idaho st at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e nti n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng c ons t i tut i ona l vi ol a t i ons in c o n n e c tio n w ith th e c o n d itio n s o f h is c o n f in e m e n t an dm e d ic a l tr e a tm e n t in



# FI LED FEB 25 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 35965 2 L a t a h C ountyJ a i l . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de n o v o . W y at t v . T e rhune , 3 1 5 F. 3 d1 1 0 8 , 1 1 1 7 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e a f f i rm. T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyd is m is s e dM ub ita ’s a c tio n b e c au s e h e f a ile dto e x h au s t a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s o rd e m o n s tr a te th a t h e w a s e x c u s e df r o m d o in g s o . Se e W oodf ord v . N go , 54 8 U . S . 81 , 85 , 93 -95 (20 06 ) ( ho l di ng that“ prop er exhaust i on ” i s m andat ory and re qu i re s a dh er ence t o adm i ni strat i ve procedural rul es ). T h e d i stri ctco u rtd i dn o tab u se i t s d i scret i o n b y d en yi n g M ub i t a’ s req u est for app oi ntm entof coun se l because he f ai l ed t o d em on strat e e xtra ordi nary ci rcu m st an ces. See T

erre l l v. B re w er , 935 F . 2d 1015, 1017 ( 9th C i r . 1991) ( s e tt i ng forth st andard of revi ew and requi re m ent s f or appo i ntm entof coun se l ). M ub i t a’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. M ub ita ’s m o tio n f

o rle a v e to f

ile e x h ib its in s up p o rt o f h is R e p lyB r ie f

is gr a nt e d. AF F I RME D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1998, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 
JUNE 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                    1,317,994
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                               147,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                 140,863
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          1,610,683
<PP&E>                                   13,451,401
<DEPRECIATION>                           (5,719,912)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           10,675,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     2,088,256
<BONDS>                                   3,420,222
<COMMON>                                      8,549
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                     554
<OTHER-SE>                                5,157,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             10,675,090
<SALES>                                     730,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            731,410
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               891,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          1,799,229
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (650,521)        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (1,961,908)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (1,961,908)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                             (1,961,908)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.19)
        



</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 4.1

                         CORRECTED CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                     CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 2003-C


         This Corrected Certificate of Trust of Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust
2003-C (hereinafter called the "Trust"), a statutory trust organized and
existing under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. ss. 3801 et seq.)
(the "Act"), is being filed by the undersigned, as trustee, to correct the
Certificate of Trust of the Trust that was filed on October 28, 2003 (the
"Certificate of Trust") as permitted by Section 3810 of the Act.

                  1. The inaccuracy or defect in the Certificate of Trust to be
corrected is the address for the trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware,
which address contained an incorrect street name.

                  2. The Certificate of Trust is hereby corrected to read in its
entirety as follows:






<PAGE>




                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF

                     Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2003-C

                  THIS Certificate of Trust of Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust
2003-C (the "Trust") is being duly executed and filed by Wilmington Trust
Company, a Delaware banking corporation, as trustee, to form a statutory trust
under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. ss.3801 et seq.) (the "Act").

                  1. Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is
Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2003-C.

                  2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the
trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware are Wilmington Trust Company,
Rodney Square North, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001,
Attention: Corporate Trust Administration.

                  3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be
effective upon filing.


                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
certificate in accordance with the Act.


                                  WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in
                                  its individual capacity, but solely as trustee


                                  By: /s/ Emmett R. Harmon
                                      --------------------------------------
                                      Name: Emmett R. Harmon
                                      Title:  Vice President
EXHIBIT 34.2




[Letterhead of KPMG LLP]




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board of Directors




Citibank, N.A.:




We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, that the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and certain privately-issued (i.e., for which transaction-level reporting is required pursuant to contractual obligation) automobile loan or lease-backed securities, equipment loan-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, as listed in Appendix A of the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013.  Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.




Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.




In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 is fairly stated, in all material respects.






/s/ KPMG LLP









Chicago, Illinois




February 28, 2014
**Exhibit 10.5**

 

**AMENDMENT TO SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE**

 

 

August 28, 2003 

 

Reference is made to that certain Secured Promissory Note, dated June 13,2003, made by VIDEO CITY INC., a Delaware corporation (“Maker” or “the Company”), in favor of                     (“Payee”), for the principal sum of $460,000 (the “Note”). Maker and Payee have agreed to extend the maturity date of the Note and to otherwise amend the Note pursuant to this Amendment to Secured Promissory Note(“Amendment”): 

 

**1. Amendment.** Section 2 ofthe Note shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

 

**2. Payment of Principal and Interest.** Principal shall be payable in lawful money of the United States in immediately available funds, without deduction or offset, in one installment of $460,000 on October 16,2003 (the “Maturity Date”), plus accrued but unpaid interest, plus an extension fee of $9,200.00. 

 

**2. Interest.** Notwithstanding the amendment of Section 2 of the Note as set forth above, any accrued interest payment, that otherwise would havebeen due on August 29, 2003 under the Note, will bear like interest as principal pursuant to Section 3 of the Note from August 29, 2003 to the date of receipt by Payee of all amounts owing under the Note, as amended hereby. 

 

**3. Interpretation.** In the event of any conflict between the provisionsof the Note and the provisions of this Amendment, the provisions of this Amendment shall control. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Note shall remain in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed. 

 

**4. Partial Invalidity.** If any provision of this Amendment is held tobe unenforceable for any reason, it shall be adjusted rather than voided, if possible, to achieve the intent of the parties to the extent possible. In any event, all other provisions of this Amendment shall be deemed valid and enforceable to theextent possible. 

 

**5. Counterparts**. This Amendment may beexecuted in any number of counterparts (including any facsimile counterparts), each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker and Payee have executed this Amendment 

as of the date first above written at Bakersfield, California. 

 

**VIDEO CITY, INC., a Delaware corporation**

/s/    ROBERT Y.LEE        
Robert Y. LeeChairman of the Board
 

/s/            

By:
 
 

Its:
EX-35.2


(logo) MIDLAND    (logo) PNC


LOAN              REAL ESTATE


SERVICES






OFFICER CERTIFICATE




J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.,


Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates


Series 2011-C5




March 1, 2012





Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement


(the "Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of PNC Bank, National


Association d/b/a Midland Loan Services as successor by merger to Midland Loan


Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"),


(i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the calendar year 2011 (the


"Reporting Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made


under the undersigned officer's supervision;


(ii) to the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review,


the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all


material respects throughout the Reporting Period or, if there has been a


failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such


failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are


set forth below; and


(iii) the Servicer has not received any notice during the Reporting Period


regarding qualification, or challenging the status, of any REMIC formed pursuant


to the Agreement from the IRS or any other governmental agency or body.




Nature and Status of Failures: None.






PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCATION


d/ba MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES




/s/ Steven W. Smith


Steven W. Smith


Executive Vice President






Member of The PNC Financial Services Group


10851 Mastin Boulevard Overland Park, Kansas 66210


800-327-8083


www.pnc.com/midland
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350   In connection with the Annual Report of CCJ Acquisition Corp., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jay D. Solomon, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:  (i)  the accompanying Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act); and  (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   CCJ ACQUISITION CORP.  /s/: Jay D. Solomon JAY D. SOLOMON Chief Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer Principal Accounting Officer  August 29, 2012
Order entered May 1 , 2015

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 00093

- CR

DAVID HENRY BROOMFIE LD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Co urt Cause No. F

- 1433325

- J



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.

On April 1, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the

reporter’s record had not been filed. On May 1, 2015, we received the reporter’s record.

Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the April 1, 2015 order

requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6600

JOSE ANGEL HERRERA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JOSEPH MCFADDEN, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior

District Judge. (6:15-cv-00505-MBS)

Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 20, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Angel Herrera, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, James Anthony Mabry, 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jose Angel Herrera seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Herrera has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly,

although we grant Herrera’s motion for leave to file a 

supplemental informal brief, we deny a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 
3

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED