alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RENAL CARE GROUP, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          28,202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,818
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,704
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,092
<PP&E>                                         119,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 478,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,812
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           452
<OTHER-SE>                                     289,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   478,033
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               399,321
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  258,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,924
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,698
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,780
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,158
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,556
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,602
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,602
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of U.S. Restaurant Properties, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert J. Stetson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|/s/ROBERT J. STETSONRobert J. Stetson
Chief Executive Officer
May 2, 2003 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
#### T. Chowning et al. v. Catherine Chowning.

(No. 2185.)

Error from Wilbarger County.

*(Transferred from Austin.)*

Elliott & Setterby, counsel for plaintiffs in error.

H. C. Thompson, counsel for defendant in error.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§150. *Attorney’s fees stipulated in note; sufficient allegations to authorize judgment for; case stated.*Suit by defendant in error against plaintiffs in error upon a promissory note for $300, which stipulated for twelve per cent, per annum interest from date, and for ten per cent., upon the principal sum to pay attorney’s fees in case suit had to be instituted to collect said note. Judgment by default against defendants for the amount of said note, interest and ten per cent, attorney’s fees, and also that said judgment should bear interest at the rate of twelve per cent, per annum from the date of its rendition. It is alleged in the petition that the defendants agreed and undertook to pay said ten per cent, attornej^’s fees, and the note itself is copied into the petition, and contains such stipulation. The petition prays for judgment for said attorney’s fees. *Held:*The petition authorized the judgment for said attorney’s fees. [2 W. Con. Rep. § 557.]

§ 151. *Interest on judgment for. such attorney’s fees.*When the ten per cent, attorney’s fees became a part of the judgment, the amount thereof bore the same rate of interest that the principal sum bore, to wit, twelve per cent., that being the rate of interest stipulated in the note. [Washington v. First Nat. Bank, 64 Tex. 4.]

*192October 27, 1886.

§ 152. *Citation; return of service of, held insufficient.*The return of service of citation is as follows: “Came to hand this, the 5th day of August, 1885, at-o’clock M., and executed the 5th day of August, 1885, by delivering to J. R. Summers, H. Chowning, and further executed on tho 28th day of August, 1885, by delivering T. Chowning, the within named defendants, in person, a true copy of this writ.” Held, this return is insufficient to authorize the judgment by default, in that it does not show that a copy of the citation was served upon *each of*the defendants. [2 *W. Con.*Rep. § 2G9.]

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1170]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                         TRIBUTE TO OLGA S. LAW

                                 ______

                          HON. DONALD M. PAYNE

                             of new jersey

                    in the house of representatives

                         Wednesday, June 7, 1995
  Mr. PAYNE of New Jersey. Mr. Speaker, today I rise to pay tribute to 
a very special lady. Mrs. Olga Sharpe Law of Merry Hill, NC, celebrated 
her 87th birthday on May 25 and was honored at a birthday celebration 
by the church family of Zion Bethlehem Baptist Church in Windsor, NC.
  Mrs. Law, one of four children who was born in Portsmouth, VA, in 
1908, has devoted her life to the service of others. After she 
graduated from Elizabeth City State Teachers College, now Elizabeth 
City State University, she taught 5 years in Virginia and then remained 
with the Bertie County school system for 39 years. As a former teacher 
myself, I can confirm that it takes a great deal of dedication and love 
to make a 39-year commitment to the children in her community. I can 
also confirm that Mrs. Law possesses these qualities in abundance. Her 
joy came in teaching the three R's--reading, 'riting, and 'rithmetic. 
However, she got greater joy in teaching her students to respect 
themselves, and others. Many of her students still approach her to 
thank her for being a wonderful and inspirational teacher.
  But teaching for Mrs. Law did not end with the school day. She has 
and continues to serve as an adult Sunday School teacher, Bible study 
teacher, a deaconess, and a missionary. In between all of this, she 
regularly attends three churches pastored by her late husband.
  Mrs. Law is well known in the community for extending her hand to 
whomever is in need, and her deeds speak for themselves. Everyone knows 
that you do not have to call upon her for help, she often offers it.
  On June 4, 1992, because of her love for the church and its 
congregation, her soft-spoken voice and firm manner, the Rev. John W. 
Barnes bestowed her with the honor of ``The Mother'' of Zion Bethlehem 
Church.
  Mrs. Law remains very active in the woman's auxiliary to the West 
Roanoke Association and the Tri-County Minister's Wives and Widows' 
Association, both of which she has served as President. She has also 
served as worthy matron of the North Star Chapter Order of the Eastern 
Star No. 332 of Merry Hill.
  Mr. Speaker, all too frequently, we do not take the time out to 
recognize people who have made significant contributions to our 
communities until it is too late. However, Mr. Speaker, today, I am 
proud to rise in honor of a woman who has served her community with 
distinction and tenacity, and also with great humility. Mrs. Law 
epitomizes the tenet of lifetime service to her community and to 
others. She often says, ``If I can help somebody--then my living will 
not be in vain,'' and fortunately for us all, it hasn't.

                          ____________________
```
EXHIBIT 32.1.

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Tom Hofer, Chief Executive Officer of Vendalux Corporation (the "Registrant")
do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period June 30, 2006 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                               By:/s/ Tom Hofer
                                 -------------------------------
                                Tom Hofer
                                  Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2006

 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Vendalux Corporation and will be retained by Vendalux Corporation
and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Tom Hofer, Chief Accounting Officer of Vendalux Corporation (the
"Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period June 30, 2006 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                                    By:/s/ Tom Hofer
                                       -----------------------------------
                                      Tom Hofer
                                      Chief Accounting Officer

August 14, 2006

 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Vendalux Corporation and will be retained by Vendalux Corporation
and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James S.J. Manuso, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SuperGen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of SuperGen, Inc.

By:

/s/ JAMES S.J. MANUSOName:

James S.J. ManusoTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


I,
Michael Molkentin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
SuperGen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
SuperGen, Inc.

By:

/s/ MICHAEL MOLKENTINName:

Michael MolkentinTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1
                                 Subsidiaries


LHS Holding Germany GmbH

LHS Verwaltungs GmbH

LHS Verwaltungs GmbH & Co. Projekt KG zur Durcfuhrung

LHS AG

LHS Nordic AB

LHS France S.A.

LHS Asia/Pacific Sdn Bhd

LHS Hong Kong Limited

LHS Communications Systems, Inc.

LHS do Brazil Ltda.

LHS Europe Limited

LHS Italy S.r.L

LHS InfoCell, Inc.

Priority Call Management, Inc.

Priority Call Management Limited (UK)

Priority Call Management Limited (Hong Kong)
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1138 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1138

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 306 East Main Street in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, as the ``J. 
   Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2007

 Mr. Butterfield (for himself, Mr. Coble, Mr. Price of North Carolina, 
Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Etheridge, Mr. Watt, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. 
   Hayes, Mr. McIntyre, Mr. Miller of North Carolina, Ms. Foxx, Mr. 
   McHenry, and Mr. Shuler) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 306 East Main Street in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, as the ``J. 
   Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 306 
East Main Street in Elizabeth City, North Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``J. Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``J. Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,574-01

EX PARTE JOHN C. THEUS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1070888 IN THE 263RD DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to life imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Theus v. State,

No. 01-08-00284-CR (Tex. App. — Houston [1 Dist.] July 2, 2009). st

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to advise him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Appellate counsel

filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court has entered findings of

fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel attempted to advise Applicant of his right to file
2

a pro se petition for discretionary review, but that Applicant did not receive the notification. The

trial court recommends that relief be granted. 

We find, therefore, that Applicant was denied his opportunity to petition this Court for

discretionary review due to a breakdown in the system. See Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2006). Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for

discretionary review of the judgment of the First Court of Appeals in Cause No. 01-08-00284-CR

that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 1070888 from the 263rd District Court of Harris County. 

Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date

on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: January 14, 2015

Do not publish
583 A.2d 325

#### IN THE MATTER OF NJ TRANSIT BUS OPERATIONS, INC., NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION AND AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, NEW JERSEY COUNCIL; NJ TRANSIT MERCER, INC., NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION AND UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION 33 (PATERSON AND WARWICK DIVS.); NJ TRANSIT BUS OPERATIONS, NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION AND TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, LOCAL 225.

February 20, 1990.

Petition for certification granted. (See 233 *N.J.Super.*173, 558 A.2d 483)
583 A.2d 302

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DONALD HAMM.

January 12, 1990.

This matter having been duly considered by the Court, it is ORDERED that pending the resolution of the within appeal and that in *State v. John Graff*and *State v. Jeffrey Ellis,*all pending and future cases brought under *N.J.S.A.*39:4-50 are to proceed to trial without a jury; and it is further

*597ORDERED that any defendant who wishes to preserve the jury trial issue may do so by raising it on his or her appeal to the Law Division; and it is further

ORDERED that appeals in the Law Division and the Appellate Division that raise the jury trial issue are hereby stayed pending the disposition of the within matter, *Graff,*and *Ellis;*and it is further

ORDERED that any motion for a stay of all or part of a drunk driving sentence shall be brought in the court in which the appeal is pending and disposition of that motion shall rest in the sound discretion of that court.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THOMAS JOSEPH CANFIELD.

January 17, 1984.

Petition for certification granted.
News United States Air Force
 Final Airman's body recoveredPublished Oct. 8, 2014
                        
                        
                        18th Wing Public Affairs
                **KADENA AIR BASE, Japan  (AFNS) --**
                Just hours after beginning their third day of searching Oct. 8, a combined Japanese-U.S. Air Force rescue team recovered the body of the final Airman who had been swept out to sea Oct. 5.
The Airman was discovered in the water a few miles south from where the three Airmen were last spotted on the northwest coast of Okinawa.
The release of the Airman's identity is being withheld pending next-of-kin notification.
On Oct. 5, the body of Senior Master Sgt. James Swartz was recovered by the Japan Coast Guard. On Oct. 7, the body of a second Airman, whose identify is also being withheld, was discovered.
A dignified transfer ceremony was held on Kadena Air Base, Japan, Oct. 8, and the three Airmen's remains were flown off of Okinawa via military aircraft.
All three Airmen were TDY to Kadena AB from Robins Air Force Base, Georgia.
"We continue to grieve with the family, friends and fellow Airmen of those lost in this tragedy," said Col. Thomas Torkelson, the 18th Wing vice commander. "And we will never leave an Airman behind."Kadena AB 



Japan 



Robins AFB 



missing Airmen 



Okinawa Related Links
        Another Airman recovered, one remains missing
            
            1 Airman dead, 2 remain missing at sea
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 11

                       XCELLENET, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

               Computation of Earnings Per Share of Common Stock
        For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 1996 and 1995
                   (amounts in thousands, except per share)

                                                          For the Three Months Ended  For the Nine Months Ended
                                                                 September 30,              September 30,
                                                          --------------------------  ------------------------- 
                                                                 1996     1995             1996       1995
                                                          --------------------------  -------------------------
<S>                                                            <C>       <C>           <C>          <C> 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding             7,238    7,526            7,190    7,433


Add  - Shares of common stock assumed issued upon exercise of
    stock options using the "treasury stock" method as it
    applies to the computation of primary earnings per share      --        976              655    1,147
                                                               -------- --------      --------------------

Number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding        7,238    8,502            7,845    8,580

Add  - Additional shares of common stock assumed issued upon
    exercise of stock options using the "treasury stock" 
    method as it applies to the computation of fully 
    diluted  earnings per share                                     --       --                 84     --
                                                               -------- --------      --------------------

Number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding
  assuming full dilution                                         7,238    8,502            7,929    8,580
                                                                =======  =======       =========== =======


Net income                                                       ($375)    $449             $854   $2,691
                                                                =======  =======       =========== =======


Earnings per share:

    Primary                                                     ($0.05)   $0.05            $0.11    $0.31
                                                                =======  =======       =========== =======

    Fully diluted                                               ($0.05)   $0.05            $0.11    $0.31
                                                                =======  =======       =========== =======
</TABLE> 
A single presentation of primary earnings per share is made on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations because the effect of assuming full dilution is
insignificant in each period presented.
583 A.2d 315

#### ABU MUHAMMAD v. ROBERT E. STEPHENS.

January 29, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.