alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                         <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0                 125,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,490                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     73,509                  68,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,717                 216,100
<PP&E>                                         278,327                 281,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,637                  41,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 376,517                 483,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          779,030                 770,900
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,042                   7,600
<COMMON>                                           646                     600
<OTHER-SE>                                   (416,017)               (301,300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   376,517                 483,100
<SALES>                                         28,457                 176,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,457                 176,728
<CGS>                                            9,136                  17,895
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               527,818                 426,733
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 554                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (509,051)               (267,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (509,051)               (267,900)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.09)                   (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)                   (.11)



</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                         [LOGO]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to Registration
Statement No. 333-79701 of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account D
on Form N-4, of our report dated February 28, 2003 of Fortis Benefits Insurance
Company Variable Account D relating to the financial statements as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing in the Statement of Additional
Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to the
reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such Statement of Additional
Information.


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
December 4, 2003
##### 



Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew F. Puzder, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
August 11, 2003 of CKE Restaurants, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-82538 and 34-47986]

c)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financing reporting.

Date: September 15, 2003

|/s/ Andrew F. Puzder                    
|----------------------------------------
|                                        
|Andrew F. Puzder
Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 3, 2021

t0726

Order 

Clerk

August 3, 2021

162558

PETER HORWOOD and IRINA HORWOOD,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 162558

COA: 350840

Livingston CC: 19-030217-CZ

NORTH AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 22, 2020 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23746]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. AA1921-129 (Third Review)]


Polychloroprene Rubber From Japan

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Termination of five-year review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The subject five-year review was initiated in July 2010 to 
determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty finding on 
polychloroprene rubber from Japan would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury. On August 24, 2010, the 
Department of Commerce published notice that it was revoking the order 
effective August 4, 2010, ``{b{time} ecause the domestic interested 
parties did not participate in this sunset review * * *.'' (75 FR 
51981). Accordingly, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), the subject review is terminated.

DATES:  Effective Date: August 4, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. 
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by 
accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov).

    Authority:  This review is being terminated under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
pursuant to section 207.69 of the Commission's rules (19 CFR 
207.69).

    Issued: September 17, 2010.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-23746 Filed 9-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 85 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5370]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentlewoman from Ohio [Ms. Kaptur] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Ms. KAPTUR addressed the House. Her remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
Second Amendment to 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan



 Exhibit 10.40 
  
 From minutes of a meeting of the Board of Directors of 
  
 BJ Services Company held on March 22, 2001 
  

Amendment of 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to Reflect Stock Dividend 
  
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has previously reserved 3,000,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance
pursuant to awards granted or to be granted under the BJ Services Company 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Stock Purchase Plan”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Stock Purchase Plan provides for the adjustment of the number of shares subject to such plan in certain events, including events such as
the Stock Dividend; 
  
 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that,
effective as of the Stock Dividend Record Date, the Board of Directors of the Company authorizes and approves a total of 6,000,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance pursuant to the Stock Purchase Plan; and 
  
 RESOLVED FURTHER, that, effective as of the Stock Dividend Record Date,
Section 4 of the Stock Purchase Plan is amended to provide as follows: 
  
 The first sentence of Section 4 is hereby deleted and replaced with: 
  
 “Subject to the provisions of paragraph 11 (relating to adjustment upon changes in stock), the aggregate number of shares which may be sold
pursuant to options granted under the Plan shall not exceed 6,000,000 shares of the authorized $.10 par value common stock of the Company (“Stock”), which shares may be unissued shares or required shares or shares bought on the market for
purposes of the Plan.”; and 
  
 RESOLVED FURTHER, that, effective as
of the Stock Dividend Record Date, the “option price”, as defined in the Stock Purchase Plan, shall be determined as follows for the plan year beginning October 1, 2000: an amount equal to 85% of (I) the fair market value per share of the
Common Stock on the date of exerciseor (ii) one-half of the fair market value per share of the Common Stock on the date of Grant, whichever amount is lesser; and 
  
 RESOLVED FURTHER, that with respect to “options” currently outstanding to purchase shares of Common Stock under
the 








 
Stock Purchase Plan, the number of shares of Common Stock subject to each such option shall be doubled, in order that there be two shares of Common Stock
subject to such option for each share of Common Stock subject to such option immediately before the Stock Dividend.
#### RICHARD A. LORICCO, SR., TRUSTEE *v.*EDMUND L. PANTANI ET AL.

(AC 22609)

Dranginis, McLachlan and Hennessy, Js.

Argued June 2

officially released July 8, 2003

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4957]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentlewoman from Ohio [Ms. Kaptur] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Ms. KAPTUR addressed the House. Her remarks will appear hereafter in 
the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 90 (Monday, June 5, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7696-S7697]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              INTRODUCTION OF BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

  The following bills and joint resolutions were introduced, read the 
first and second time by unanimous consent, and referred as indicated:

           By Mr. DASCHLE:
       S. 879. A bill to amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to 
     limit acquisition of land on the 39-mile headwaters segment 
     of the Missouri River, Nebraska and South Dakota, designated 
     as recreational river, to acquisition from willing sellers; 
     to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
           By Mrs. HUTCHISON:
       S. 880. A bill to enhance fairness in compensating owners 
     of patents used by the United States; to the Committee on the 
     Judiciary.
           By Mr. PRYOR (for himself and Mr. Grassley):
       S. 881. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
     to clarify provisions relating to church pension benefit 
     plans, to modify certain provisions relating to participants 
     in such plans, to reduce the complexity of and to bring 
     workable consistency to the applicable rules, to promote 
     retirement savings and benefits, and for other purposes; to 
     the Committee on Finance.
           By Mr. PRESSLER (for himself and Mr. Daschle):

[[Page S7697]]

       S. 882. A bill to designate the Federal building at 1314 
     LeMay Boulevard, Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, as 
     the ``Cartney Koch McRaven Child Development Center,'' and 
     for other purposes; to the Committee on Environment and 
     Public Works.
     

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EDAC Technologies
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended July 1, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 1, 2006                   /s/ Dominick A. Pagano
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Dominick A. Pagano
                                        Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August 1, 2006                   /s/ Glenn L. Purple
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Glenn L. Purple
                                        Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to EDAC Technologies Corporation and will be retained by EDAC
Technologies Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-1338V

UNPUBLISHED

CLIFTON FOLEY and KELLI FOLEY, 

on behalf of their deceased minor child, 

N.F.,

 Petitioners,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: February 9, 2022

Withdrawal of petition; Order 

concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On May 7, 2021, Clifton and Kelli Foley filed a petition for compensation on 

behalf of their minor child, N.F., under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation 

Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through 34.

2 Petitioners alleged that N.F. suffered 

injuries after receiving a human papillomavirus vaccination on May 7, 2018, that 

ultimately led to N.F.’s death. ECF no. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine 

Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “that the petitioner may withdraw the petition 

under section 300aa—21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section 

300aa—21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master.” 42 

U.S.C. § 300aa—12(g). On January 8, 2022, Petitioners timely filed a notice to withdraw 

the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—21(b). 

In light of Petitioners’ election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa—21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioners’ request to withdraw the

petition is GRANTED. Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that 

proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment 

“on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Office.

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United 

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal 

Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available 

to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, 

I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
760 A.2d 845

#### In the Matter of James Richard BANKO. Petition for Reinstatement from Inactive Status.

No. 20 DB 2000.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 14, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 2000, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated August 17, 2000, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that JAMES RICHARD BANKO, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board *337in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.
News United States Air Force
 Thunderbird F-16 crashes after Academy graduation; pilot unhurtPublished June 2, 2016
                        
                        By Air Force News Service
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                One of the U.S. Air Force Thunderbirds crash landed June 2 in a field near Colorado Springs, Colorado, following the U.S. Air Force Academy commencement, which was attended by President Barack Obama.
The F-16 Fighting Falcon, the #6 jet in the formation, crashed about 5 nautical miles south of Peterson Air Force Base at approximately 1 p.m., according to a Air Combat Command news release.
The pilot ejected safely and is with medical personnel undergoing evaluation as a precaution, the release said.
“My thoughts are with the pilot, their family and friends and all (of the Thunderbirds personnel),” Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James wrote in a tweet. “Glad to hear pilot is safe.”
The Air Force will perform a thorough investigation into the causes of the mishap, and those findings will be released when the investigation is complete.
Video of the Thunderbirds flyover at the U.S. Air Force Academy commencement June 2.Thunderbirds 



crash 



U.S. Air Force Academy 



graduation
<Page>

                                                                          [LOGO]

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to Registration
Statement No. 033-73986 of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account D
on Form N-4, of our report dated February 28, 2003 of Fortis Benefits Insurance
Company Variable Account D relating to the financial statements as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing in the Statement of Additional
Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and to the
reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such Statement of Additional
Information.


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
December 4, 2003