alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Tom Hofer, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of Vendalux Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2000, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Vendalux
Corporation

By:       /s/
   --------------------
   Name: Tom Hofer
   Title:   Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer
News United States Air Force
 Mauritania partnership flight wraps upPublished Sept. 4, 2014
                        
                        By Master Sgt. Brian M. Boisvert
                        
                        
                        U.S. Air Forces Europe – Air Forces Africa Public Affairs
                **ATAR AIRBASE, Mauritania (AFNS) --**
                The last full day of African Partnership Flight Mauritania was filled with a group intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance planning exercise, an ISR field capstone event, and the arrival of two Mauritanian Super Tucanos and a Cessna-208 Grand Caravan, Sept. 3, at Atar Airbase, here.Six African nations participated in the week-long classroom events and completed lessons in ISR, ground and air safety procedures, and air operations center management as part of APF Mauritania before receiving their graduation certificates as part of the closing ceremony scheduled for Sept. 4."This training is very important and beneficial to exchange skills and share experiences for improving our nations here in Africa," said a student from Burkina Faso.Following the last formal classroom training session, the students were met by Col. Mohammad Lehreitani, the Mauritania air force chief in command. He asked them about the instruction they received and what they learned during the week.The final event allowed students and other distinguished visitors to view the Mauritanian air force intercepting and engaging a simulated threat using ISR capabilities."It was really interesting to see how everything we learned was put into use," a Mauritanian student said.APF Mauritania was the third of its kind in 2014, but the first one co-hosted by the Mauritanian government and focused on ISR training at the request of the Mauritanian government.About 55 African air force airmen attended the APF discussions that were designed to build aviation capacity, enhance regional cooperation, and increase interoperability throughout the region while growing international aviation knowledge and developing stronger air force partnerships.Mauritania 



Africa 



training 



joint 



ISR 



 



African Partnership Flight
#### RENEE PORTEE v. EDITH JAFFEE.

Feb. 5, 1980.

Petition for certification to Superior Court, Law Division granted.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 85 (Monday, May 22, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5370]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

  Mr. FORD. Mr. Speaker, I would like the Record to reflect that on 
Thursday, May 18, 1995, I was incorrectly recorded as ``aye'' on 
rollcall No. 343, the Neumann substitute to the budget resolution, 
House Concurrent Resolution 67. I should have been recorded in 
opposition to this resolution.

                          ____________________
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES INVESTMENT CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND SAVE WAY STATIONS, INC., HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND TOWN OF SECAUCUS, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

Argued April 11, 1978

Decided May 2, 1978.

*Mr. Harold F. Kushin*argued the cause for appellant *(Messrs.*Wilentz, *Goldman*and *Spilzer,*attorneys; *Ms. M. Kathleen*Duncan, on the brief).

*Mr. Philip F. Mattia,*Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent *(Mr. John J. Degnan,*Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; *Mr. Stephen Shillman,*Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinions of the Appellate Division, reported at 151 *N. J. Super.*14 (1977), and the Law Division, reported at 143 *N. J. Super.*541 (1976).

*For affirmance—*Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford, Schreiber and Handler and Judge Conford — 7.

*For reversal*— Hone.
News United States Air Force
 US Military Academy to host 2016 DOD Warrior GamesPublished Dec. 15, 2015
                        
                        By DoD News, Defense Media Activity
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                The 2016 Department of Defense Warrior Games will be hosted at the U.S. Military Academy in West Point, New York, from June 14-22, according to DOD officials.
This is the first year the Army is hosting the Warrior Games, which is an annual sporting competition bringing together wounded, ill and injured service members and veterans from across the country.
"The United States Military Academy and the entire West Point Community are honored to host the 2016 DOD Warrior Games," said Lt. Gen. Robert Caslen, the superintendent. "These warrior-athletes competing in the games, who at one time answered their nation's call to service, exemplify the very best of America. They embody the resiliency, discipline, mental and physical toughness to overcome adversity and achieve their goals -- all traits we aspire to instill in our graduates, who will lead America's sons and daughters as Army officers."
DOD Warrior Games 2016 will feature eight sporting events: archery, cycling, shooting, sitting volleyball, swimming, track and field, and wheelchair basketball in a paralympic-style competition. Approximately 200 athletes representing teams from the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force, and U.S. Special Operations Command will compete. Each military service hosts trials in the months leading up to the games to determine their teams.
"The 2016 DOD Warrior Games will showcase the enduring strength of our service men and women who have overcome adversity and are using adapted reconditioning to become resilient warrior athletes. They represent the strength and resiliency of this great country," said Col. Chris Toner, the commander of the U.S. Army Warrior Transition Command and assistant surgeon general for warrior care and transition. "Warrior Games is an opportunity for the services to communicate their sacred obligation and enduring commitment to their wounded, ill and injured service members, their families and caregivers."  
Adaptive sports and athletic reconditioning activities play a fundamental role in recovery, rehabilitation and reintegration of service members back to their units or as they transition into the civilian sector.Follow the DOD Warrior Games Facebook page for up to date information:**www.facebook.com/warriorgames**.For more information on the wounded warrior program, visit**www.woundedwarrior.af.mil**.Warrior Games 



U.S. Military Academy 



wounded warrior 



resiliency
#### P. Vogle, Jr., v. W. E. Kendall et al.

(No. 59, Tex. L. J., vol. 1, p. 183.)

Appeal from Fort Bend County.

January 16, 1878.

Opinion by

Winklee, J.

§ 668. *Notice of appeal essential to jurisdiction.*Without notice of appeal was given and entered of record in the court below, this court has no jurisdiction of the cause, and on this account this appeal must be dismissed. [Forrest v. Rawlings, 10 Tex. 502.]

Dismissed.
NUMBER 13-14-00533-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS, RICHARD FREYMANN,

AND AARON AQUILES GALVAN

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relators, State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freymann, and Aaron Aquiles Galvan, have 

filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court direct respondent, the 

Honorable Rose Guerra Reyna, Presiding Judge of the 206th District Court of Hidalgo 

County, Texas, to withdraw her order denying relators’ verified plea in abatement and to 

enter an order abating the suit for damages brought against relators by the real parties in 

interest, Eustorgio Farias and Maria Farias, until sixty days after they provide relators with 

 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

a notice letter for their claim stating the specific, separate amounts for the claimed 

damages and attorney’s fees. See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154 (West, Westlaw 

through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Prior Notice of Action”); id. § 541.155 (West, Westlaw through 

2013 3d C.S.) (“Abatement”); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1 (“Commencement” of Original 

Proceedings). In addition, relators request that this Court issue immediate temporary 

relief staying respondent’s order denying the plea in abatement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.10 (“Temporary Relief”). 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus 

and the applicable law, is of the opinion that the petition for writ of mandamus should be 

denied for the reasons expressed in our opinion in In re State Farm Lloyds, Richard 

Freymann, and Nathan Burris, No. 13-14-00347-CV, 2014 WL 4243701, at **4–9 (Tex. 

App.—Corpus Christi Aug. 27, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op). Accordingly, the 

Court DENIES the petition for writ of mandamus and request for immediate temporary 

relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

23rd day of September, 2014.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) FOR COMMERCE NATIONAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARY DATED MARCH 31, 1999 AND DECEMBER 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,984,619
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               800,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 14,386,878
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    130,489,745
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,399,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             159,041,027
<DEPOSITS>                                 138,572,475
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,129,357
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            609,068
<LONG-TERM>                                  4,528,593
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        74,282
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,127,252
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             159,041,027
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,737,262
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              205,183
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                40,991
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,983,436
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,233,260
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,333,343
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,650,093
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   74,881
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,207,981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                616,132
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     616,132
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   385,480
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0.045
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,002,823
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               864,091
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,693,782
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,323,143
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      292
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,399,732
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,399,732
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        903,378
        

</TABLE>
#### HERBERT A. KENNISON v. LAWRENCE H. LUCKER AND ANOTHER.1

December 19, 1919.

No. 21,571.

Architect’s fee — findings sustained.

Action for architect’s fee for preparation of plans and specifications for a residence. Conflicting evidence. Finding in favor of plaintiff. *Held-.*The finding wajs not clearly against the evidence. [Reporter.]

Action in the district court for .Hennepin, county to recover $640, and foreclose a mechanic’s lien for the same. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Fish, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff for the- amount demanded, together with an attorney’s fee of $100; that the amount be made a specific lien upon the premises, and that they be sold to satisfy the lien. From an order overruling their motion for amended findings and conclusions of law or for a new trial, defendants appealed.

Affirmed.

*Louis A. Hubaehek*and *Louis H. Joss,*for appellants.

*Hoke, Kruse & Faegre,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 175 N. W. 1007.

Per Curiam.

The only question presented in this case is whether the findings of the trial court are clearly and manifestly against the evidence. We are unable to say that they are, and the order appealed from must be affirmed. Plaintiff’s claim is that, at the instance and request of defendants, he prepared certain plans and specifications for a residence which they contemplated constructing in the city of Minneapolijs, for which they agreed to pay him an amount equal to four per cent of the cost of construction. The defense in substance was that the plans and specifications were prepared by plain*470tiff on the express understanding that defendants were to pay nothing therefor unless they were acceptable and were used; that they were not acceptable and, were not ulsed. The court found that the defense thus alleged was not sustained 'by the evidences Our conclusion is that the finding is not clearly against the evidence.

Order affirmed.
#### Tonio, Appellee, *v.*Lett & Co. of Indiana, Inc., Appellant.

(Decided June 3, 1940.)

*Mr. Peter B. Betras,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Harrington, Huxley $ Smith,*for appellant.

Phillips, J.

Defendant, an Indiana corporation, *305appealed to this court on questions of law, from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Mahoning county overruling defendant’s motion to quash service of summons on it in plaintiff’s action against it for damages for personal injuries.

Plaintiff filed an action in the Court of Common Pleas against the defendant on September 15, 1938, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained on March 3, 1937.

A summons was issued on September 15, 1908, and service sought upon the defendant through the Secretary of State under the provisions of Sections 6308-1, 6308-2 and 6308-3, General Code, but no service was obtained.

A first *alias*summons was issued on February 27, 1939, in the same manner, and this *alias*summons likewise was returned on March 15, 1939, no service being obtained.

A second *alias*summons was issued on April 13, 1939, to the sheriff of Hamilton county in this state, and personal service was obtained upon an officer of the company in that county on this second *alias*summons on April 17, 1939.

Defendant filed a motion to quash this service, which the lower court overruled on August 7, 1939.

The first question presented is whether this order of the lower court overruling the motion to quash is a final order from which an appeal can be prosecuted to this court.

A final order is defined by Section 12223-2, General Code, as:

> “An order affecting a substantial right in an action, when in effect it determines the action and prevents a judgment, or an order affecting a substantial right made in a special proceeding, or upon a summary application in an action after judgment, or an order vacating or setting aside a general verdict of a jury *306and ordering a new trial, is a final order which may be reviewed, affirmed, modified, or reversed, with or without retrial, as provided in this title.”

Tested by this definition of .a final order we are satisfied that the order appealed from in this case lacks the characteristics of finality for the reason that it does not determine the action and prevent a judgment.

Further, to hold it is a final order this court would have to anticipate that the statute of limitations would be interposed in the action in the lower court, whereas the statute may be and is waived unless pleaded. Section 11218, General Code.

In the absence of a motion to dismiss the appeal, as in this case, this court *sua sponte*may dismiss the appeal.

“Where an appeal is taken to the Court of Appeals without a final order in the lower court, the Court of Appeals *sua sponte*may dismiss the appeal.” *Wolf*v. *Western & Southern Life Ins. Co.,*59 Ohio App., 238, 17 N. E. (2d), 438.

The appeal accordingly is hereby dismissed *sua sponte.*

*Appeal dismissed.*

Nichols, P. J., and Carter, J., concur.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                   AMERICAN BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


              Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of American Business Financial Services, Inc. (the
"Company") does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



Date: February 17, 2004                           /s/ Anthony J. Santilli
                                                  -------------------------
                                                      Anthony J. Santilli
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


Date: February 17, 2004                           /s/ Albert W. Mandia
                                                  -------------------------
                                                       Albert W. Mandia
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

              The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.
II 

Calendar No. 143 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1114 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2007 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of the Interior, acting through 

the Bureau of Reclamation and the United States Geological Survey, to conduct a study on groundwater resources in the State of Alaska, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alaska Water Re5 sources Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

9 the Secretary of the Interior. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

HR 1114 PCS

1 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

2 of Alaska. 

3 SEC. 3. ALASKA WATER RESOURCES STUDY. 

4 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary, acting through the Com5 missioner of Reclamation and the Director of the United 

6 States Geological Survey, where appropriate, and in ac7 cordance with this Act and other applicable provisions of 

8 law, shall conduct a study that includes— 

9 (1) a survey of accessible water supplies, includ10 ing aquifers, on the Kenai Peninsula and in the Mu11 nicipality of Anchorage, the Matanuska-Susitna Bor12 ough, the city of Fairbanks, and the Fairbanks 

13 Northstar Borough; 

14 (2) a survey of water treatment needs and tech15 nologies, including desalination, applicable to the 

16 water resources of the State; and 

17 (3) a review of the need for enhancement of the 

18 streamflow information collected by the United 

19 States Geological Survey in the State relating to 

20 critical water needs in areas such as— 

21 (A) infrastructure risks to State transpor22 tation; 

23 (B) flood forecasting; 

24 (C) resource extraction; and 

25 (D) fire management. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

HR 1114 PCS

1 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the date 

2 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 

3 to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of 

4 Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Nat5 ural Resources of the Senate a report describing the re6 sults of the study required by subsection (a). 

7 SEC. 4. SUNSET. 

8 The authority of the Secretary to carry out any provi9 sions of this Act shall terminate 10 years after the date 

10 of the enactment of this Act. 

11 SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

12 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

13 as are necessary to carry out this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
Calendar No. 143 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1114 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of the Interior, acting 

Alaska, and for other purposes. study on groundwater resources in the State of United States Geological Survey, to conduct a through the Bureau of Reclamation and the 

MAY 8, 2007 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS