alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HEMASURE INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                            1,771
<SECURITIES>                                     10,895
<RECEIVABLES>                                         6
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                       3,571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 16,382
<PP&E>                                            5,134
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2,796
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   18,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,868
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                            197
<OTHER-SE>                                       15,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     18,770
<SALES>                                           2,747
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2,747
<CGS>                                             5,754
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  8,052
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,052)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11,374)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (11,374)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,374)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0



</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: D-Day 78, Esports Champs, Nutrition KitchenPublished June 10, 2022
                        
                        By Tech. Sgt. Britt Crolley
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, Airmen join D-Day 78th anniversary commemorations honoring those who gave their lives on the beaches of Normandy, Air Force Gaming takes home the trophy in the inaugural Armed Forces Esports Championship, and a new video series, called “Nutrition Kitchen,” aims to inspire service members to eat healthier. (Hosted by Tech Sgt. Eric Mann)



For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:**- 37 AS commemorates 78th DDay anniversary with flyovers****- DAF Gaming delivers gaming expo, esports championship at FORCECON 2022****- Air Force Medical Service launches ‘Nutrition Kitchen’ series**Featured Video 



AFTV 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



Air Force 



AF
News United States Air Force
 Airmen, families, friends remember loved ones at ArlingtonPublished Dec. 15, 2014
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Christopher Gross
                        
                        
                        Air Force News Service
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                Nearly 50,000 volunteers came together to place remembrance wreaths on the headstones of about 230,000 veterans during the 23rd Annual National Wreaths Across America Day Dec. 13, at Arlington National Cemetery, Virginia.Airmen from all around the Washington D.C. area, along with friends and families of fallen warriors were among the thousands.One of those family members of a fallen warrior was Susan Zerbe, of York, Pennsylvania, who lost her son, Tech. Sgt. Daniel Zerbe. He was killed when a CH-47 Chinook he was on crashed in Afghanistan’s Wardak Province Aug. 6, 2011.Zerbe’s mother said he was an amazing son and was always determined to help others. As an Air Force Special Operations Command pararescueman she said he epitomized the motto, “that others may live.”As she stood by grave with the wreath already laid, she reminisced about what a “jokester,” her son was growing up and how he loved the outdoors. “He was an incredible human being, and I’m so proud I got to be his mother,” she said.Helping lay remembrance wreaths like on that of Zerbe’s was Lt. Col. David Burnett, assigned to the Joint Staff, J1, Plans and Readiness Personnel Readiness Division at the Pentagon. Surrounded by the thousands of volunteers that showed up to pay their respects to veterans of all generations, Burnett said he felt a great sense of pride and was humbled by the experience.One of the things Burnett said he enjoyed seeing was the amount of children who came out to help with the event.“It’s great, you see these (kids) with so much energy (and) it’s a learning thing for them,” Burnett said. “They can really get an appreciation of what these folks have done for our country.”That energy could be seen as a Boy Scout troop from New York helped unpack one of the 80 trucks full of wreaths in which Maj. Michael Hayek, the close air support branch chief and the air liaison officer career field manager at the Pentagon, was in charge of.“To me, that’s the type of mentorship (and) leadership we need to instill for young kids,” Hayek said as he also reflected on his thoughts of seeing all the remembrance wreaths laid out.“To see something like this is very impressive, very moving. It just makes you understand and appreciate what (it) is that we do and what it is that we’re apart of for our country,” said Hayek, who has friends buried at Arlington and whose father is also buried in a military cemetery.(Some information courtesy of Wreaths Across America press release)Wreaths Across America 



honor 



wreaths 



Tech. Sgt. Daniel Zerbe 



Pentagon 



Arlington National Cemetery 



remembrance 



veterans 



Arlington
# Chief Cody talks innovation with Barksdale Airmen

        By Airman 1st Class Joseph Raatz ,   2nd Bomb Wing Public Affairs / Published January 28, 2015

**BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, La. (AFNS) -- **

PHOTO DETAILS /  DOWNLOAD HI-RES

Senior Airman Matthew Binstock speaks to Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force James A. Cody about the functions of a flap swing Jan. 23, 2015, at Barksdale Air Force Base, La. Maintenance Airmen use flap swings to install and remove B-52H Stratofortress aircraft wing flaps. Binstock is a 2nd Maintenance Squadron phase inspection journeyman. (U.S. Air Force photo/Airman 1st Class Curt Beach)

PHOTO DETAILS /  DOWNLOAD HI-RES

Senior Airman William Greenway demonstrates welding procedures with retired Chief Master Sgt. Athena Cody, wife of Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force James A. Cody, Jan. 23, 2015, on Barksdale Air Force Base, La. During her two-day visit, Cody toured the base and visited several different squadrons to speak with Airmen and experience their day-to-day duties. Greenway is a 2nd Maintenance Squadron metals technician journeyman. (U.S. Air Force photo/Airman 1st Class Curt Beach)

PHOTO DETAILS /  DOWNLOAD HI-RES

Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force James A. Cody observes the procedures for packing a parachute Jan. 23, 2015, at Barksdale Air Force Base, La. While experiencing some of the tasks Airmen complete daily, Cody shared his views on the challenges and opportunities facing today's Airmen. (U.S. Air Force photo/Airman 1st Class Curt Beach)

PHOTO DETAILS /  DOWNLOAD HI-RES

Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force James A. Cody speaks with Airmen from the 2nd Maintenance Squadron Jan. 23, 2015, at Barksdale Air Force Base, La. Cody answered Airmen's questions and also spoke about the changes on the new enlisted performance reviews. (U.S. Air Force photo/Airman 1st Class Curt Beach)

Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force James A. CodyCMSAFBarksdale Air Force BaseAirman’s callinnovationmotivation
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TECK KIM NG, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-72431 

Agency No. A070-088-937 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 3, 2020**

Before: MURGUIA, CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Teck Kim Ng, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen exclusion proceedings 

conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the 

petition for review.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-72431 

The BIA denied Ng’s motion to reopen because he failed to establish 

reasonable cause for his failure to appear at his hearing, and in the alternative, as a 

matter of discretion based upon his extreme lack of diligence in pursuing his 

motion. In his opening brief, Ng failed to challenge the BIA’s denial of his motion 

to reopen as a matter of discretion, which is dispositive. See INS v. Rios-Pineda, 

471 U.S. 444, 449 (1985) (a motion to reopen is within the sound discretion of the 

Attorney General, and the Attorney General has “broad discretion” to grant or deny 

motions to reopen); Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 

2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are 

waived). 

Because the denial as a matter of discretion is dispositive, we need not 

address Ng’s contentions regarding whether he established reasonable cause for his 

failure to appear. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (the 

courts and the agency are not required to make findings on issues the decision of 

which is unnecessary to the results).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4918]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                                 RECESS

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 12 of rule I, the Chair 
declares the House in recess subject to the call of the Chair.
  Accordingly (at 12 o'clock and 6 minutes p.m.), the House stood in 
recess subject to the call of the Chair.

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1
 
                               BEA SYSTEMS, INC.
 
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Fiscal years ended January 31,
                                        --------------------------------------
                                          1999      1998      1997      1996
                                        --------  --------  --------  --------
<S>                                     <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Loss before income taxes............... $(46,726) $(20,068) $(87,034) $(17,680)
Add fixed charges......................   16,615     8,531     3,238       193
                                        --------  --------  --------  --------
Earnings (as defined).................. $(30,111) $(11,537) $(78,796) $(17,487)
                                        ========  ========  ========  ========
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense..................... $ 10,426  $  6,054  $  6,727  $     89
  Portion of rent expense
   representative of interest..........    5,528     2,477     1,511       104
  Amortization of debt issuance costs..      661        -         -         -
                                        --------  --------  --------  --------
    Total fixed charges................ $ 16,615  $  8,531  $  8,238  $    193
                                        ========  ========  ========  ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.....        *         *         *         *
                                        ========  ========  ========  ========
</TABLE>
--------
* Earnings (as defined) were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $46,726,
  $20,068, $87,034 and $17,680 for the fiscal years ended January 31, 1999,
  1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
 
 
                         BEA Systems, Inc.-Confidential
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RIZWAN IRSHAD,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-71220

Agency No. A042-985-986

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted October 22, 2015

San Francisco, California

Before: CLIFTON and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges and LASNIK,** District Judge.

Rizwan Irshad challenges the BIA’s determination that he was convicted of

an aggravated felony, defined in Section 101(a)(43)(M)(i) of the Immigration and

Nationality Act as “an offense that . . . involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to

FILED

NOV 06 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge for the U.S. District

Court for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.
the victim or victims exceeds $10,000.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(M)(i). Irshad

agrees that his offense involved fraud or deceit, but contends that the BIA erred

when it concluded that the loss to the victims exceeded $10,000. We review

whether a conviction was for an aggravated felony de novo. Rendon v. Mukasey,

520 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir. 2008). 

The monetary threshold established by Section 101(a)(43)(M)(i) “applies to

the specific circumstances surrounding an offender’s commission of a fraud and

deceit crime on a specific occasion.” Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 40 (2009). 

Here, Irshad pleaded guilty to conspiracy under California Penal Code Section

182(a)(1) and agreed that he and his co-defendants were responsible for $22,500 in

restitution. This agreement constitutes clear and convincing evidence that the loss

to the victims exceeded $10,000. See Fuentes v. Lynch, 788 F.3d 1177, 1183 (9th

Cir. 2015) (per curiam); Ferreira v. Ashcroft, 390 F.3d 1091, 1098-1100 (9th Cir.

2004), abrogated on other grounds by Nijhawan, 557 U.S. 29. 

Although the BIA erred by relying on overt acts listed in the conspiracy

count to which Irshad did not admit, this error was harmless. See Fuentes, 788

F.3d at 1182-83. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2
760 A.2d 847

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Cornell Jason MICKENS, Respondent.

No. 614 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Oct. 5, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of October, 2000, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated August 14, 2000, it is hereby

ORDERED that Cornell Jason Mickens be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of five years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-59307, 333-35060 and 333-67520) pertaining to the 1997 Stock
Option Plan of Notify Technology Corporation and the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 Nos. 333-60552 and 333-71940) of Notify Technology Corporation and in
the related Prospectuses of our report dated October 31, 2001, with respect to
the financial statements of Notify Technology Corporation included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended September 30, 2001.

                                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
December 21, 2001
News United States Air Force
 Emerald Warrior-15 a complete successPublished May 5, 2015
                        
                        By Erica Vega
                        
                        
                        Air Force Special Operations Command Public Affairs
                **HURLBURT FIELD, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                More than 2,100 members participated in Emerald Warrior, an annual Air Force Special Operations Command two-week joint service, interagency and partner nation exercise that concluded here May 1."Emerald Warrior 2015 was a complete success,” said Col. Brenda Cartier, the Emerald Warrior 2015 exercise director. “It has gone spectacularly. I am very proud of the team and of the folks that have participated.”The exercise provided realistic and relevant pre-deployment training encompassing multiple joint operating areas. The exercise prepares special operations forces, conventional force enablers, partner nations and interagency elements to integrate with and execute full spectrum special operations.“It is very important for us to operate with other nations to see how they conduct their training, tactics and procedures,” said Flt. Lt. Mark Dilley, assigned to the Royal Air Force. “It is essential to expose our air crews to large scale multinational operations and to other disciplines they might not normally see.”Cartier echoed the importance of training in the joint, combined environment.“Coalitions are key to successful operations, together we become a better more integrated force,” she said.This year’s iteration of Emerald Warrior had more complex training scenarios that used more advanced tactics, techniques and procedures. It is the Defense Department’s only irregular warfare exercise, using both live and virtual training.“The three elements that we’re accredited to train in are close air support, tactical mobility and intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance,” Cartier said. “Emerald Warrior is one of the few exercises of this magnitude where you really get to do these partial and full mission profiles in a nighttime scenario. The missions that we’ve conducted during the past two weeks are as complex, and sometimes more complex, than the mission created (by the U.S. Special Operations Command).”The exercise took place in multiple training areas at Hurlburt Field, Eglin Air Force Base and Apalachicola in Florida; Camp Shelby and Stennis Space Center in Mississippi; Pelham Range in Alabama; and Cannon AFB in New Mexico.“We want to thank our local community and all of the civilian agencies that supported us throughout this exercise,” Cartier said.Hurlburt Field 



AFSOC 



training 



Army 



joint 



Emerald Warrior
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23736]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


 Notice of Extension of Comment Period on Proposed Consent Decree 
Under the Clean Water Act

    Notice is hereby given that the comment period on the proposed 
Consent Decree (``Consent Decree'') in United States of America et al. 
v. City of Revere, Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-11460 
(D.Mass), is being extended until November 1, 2010. The original notice 
of the proposed Consent Decree, which summarizes the settlement, was 
published in the Federal Register on August 31, 2010, Vol. 75, No. 168, 
Pg. 53342. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney 
General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, United States 
Department of Justice, and either e-mailed to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#11616473727e7c7c747f653c7474623f747f6375516462757e7b3f767e67"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="21515443424e4c4c444f550c4444520f444f5345615452454e4b0f464e57">[email protected]</span></a> or mailed to P.O. Box 7611, United States Department 
of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to United 
States of America et al. v. City of Revere, Massachusetts, D.J. Ref. 
90-5-1-1-09299.
    The Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United 
States Attorney, One Courthouse Way, John Joseph Moakley Courthouse, 
Boston, Massachusetts 02210, and at U.S. EPA Region 1, Office of 
Regional Counsel, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, 
Massachusetts 02109. During the public comment period, the Consent 
Decree may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web 
site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 
Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree 
Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 
20044-7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood 
(<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#65110a0b0c044b0309000011120a0a01251016010a0f4b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cfbba0a1a6aee1a9a3aaaabbb8a0a0ab8fbabcaba0a5e1a8a0b9">[email protected]</span></a>), fax no. (202) 514-0097, phone confirmation 
number (202) 514-1547. In requesting a copy from the Consent Decree 
Library, please enclose a check to cover the 25 cents per page 
reproduction costs in the amount of $16.25 (for Decree without 
appendix) or $71.75 (for Decree with appendix) payable to the U.S. 
Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, forward a check in that amount to the 
Consent Decree Library at the stated address.

Maureen Katz,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-23736 Filed 9-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23675]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Rescission of Order of Revocation

    Notice is hereby given that the Order revoking the following 
license is being rescinded by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant 
to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and 
the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean 
Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515.
    License Number: 004063F.
    Name: VIP Transport, Inc.
    Address: 2703 Wardlow Road, Corona, CA 91720.
    Order Published: FR: 9/1/2010 (Volume 75, No. 169, Pg. 53697).

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2010-23675 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P