alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 58422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23580]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5375-N-37]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

DATES: Effective Date: September 24, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.DC), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: September 16, 2010.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 2010-23580 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
News United States Air Force
 Yokota shares keys to resiliency with Japan alliesPublished March 11, 2015
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class David C. Danford
                        
                        
                        374th Airlift Wing Public Affairs
                **ICHIGAYA, Japan (AFNS) --**
                Resiliency can be defined as the ability to withstand, adapt or recover from life's adversities. 
U.S. Airmen around the world are being taught skills and techniques to help them deal with the stress of military life, while maintaining mission readiness as part of Comprehensive Airmen Fitness.
To further the relationship between the U.S. Air Force and the Japan Self-Defense Forces, Master Sgt. Jonas McVey, a 374th Airlift Wing master resiliency trainer, and Micaela Alexander, a community support coordinator, were invited to the JSDF headquarters in Ichigaya alongside members of Yokota AB's senior leaders to share these skills with their JSDF counterparts .
"This course is about giving our troops the tools that they need," McVey said. "The more tools you have the more flexible you are when adversity comes."
During the three-hour briefing, warrant officers from JSDF were shown how to better communicate with their subordinates, co-workers, friends and family using good listening and interpersonal problem solving techniques. The first technique focuses on active listening through responsiveness and body language, while the second is a five-step process to resolve conflict.
"We may not always be able to come up with a solution immediately, but if I treat you with respect, we'll be able to talk about the problem again," McVey said. "It doesn't always mean that I get what I want, but it will be a conversation, not an argument."
After demonstrating the techniques' effectiveness, U.S. forces, Japan; and Chief Master Sgt. James Laurent, the 5th Air Force command chief, and Chief Master Sgt. Paul Elliott, the 374th Airlift Wing command chief, shared their perspective on the resiliency program and the importance in taking care of their Airmen.
"The most important thing that a leader can do is to get to know their Airmen," Laurent said. "If you don't know what is normal for your Airmen, how will you know when something is abnormal?"Yokota AB 



Japan 



Japan Self-Defense Forces 



JSDF 



joint 



resiliency 



comprehensive airmen fitness
News United States Air Force
 F-15C Eagle pilot found dead in remote Virginia mountainsPublished Aug. 29, 2014
                        
                        
                        104th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **BARNES AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE, Mass. (AFNS) --**
                Officials confirmed today the pilot was fatally injured in the Aug. 27 crash of an F-15C Eagle in the remote mountains near Deerfield Valley, Va.
The pilot's name is being withheld pending notification of family members and will be released when appropriate.
"Our thoughts and prayers are with the family and we are doing all we can to support them during this very difficult time," said Col. James Keefe, Commander, 104th Fighter Wing. "We ask that everyone respect the privacy of the family and allow them the time they need to grieve," added Keefe.
An official safety investigation board is being convened and the investigation into the crash is ongoing.
At approximately 9:05 a.m. Wednesday, Washington Center Air Traffic Control in Washington, D.C. lost radio contact with the F-15C aircraft stationed at the 104th Fighter Wing, Mass., and at approximately 9:30 a.m. the 104th Fighter Wing learned that the aircraft had crashed in a remote site near Deerfield Valley, Va. 
The single seat F-15C aircraft was en route to Naval Air Station New Orleans to receive a radar system upgrade. The flight was not related to the 104th Fighter Wing's homeland defense mission, and there were no munitions on the aircraft during this flight. The pilot was flying a solo mission when he reported an in-flight emergency prior to the loss of radio contact with Washington Center.pilot 



dead 



Barnes ANGB 



Mass. 



Virginia 



mountains 



F-15C Eagle
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S6369]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               RECOGNITION OF THE ACTING MAJORITY LEADER

  The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The acting majority leader is recognized.

                                SCHEDULE

  Mr. GORTON. Mr. President, this morning the leader time has been 
reserved and the Senate will resume consideration of H.R. 956, the 
product liability bill.
  Under the provisions of the agreement reached last night, there will 
be at least two rollcall votes beginning at 9:45 this morning on or in 
relation to amendments to the substitute amendment. Further rollcall 
votes are expected following the 9:45 a.m. stacked votes, and a vote on 
final passage can be expected at about 11:30 this morning.
  Senators should also be aware that the Senate will begin 
consideration of the solid waste disposal bill at noon.

                          ____________________
```
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1086 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

the earned income of a spouse of a member of the Armed Forces 

of the United States serving in a combat zone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2007 

Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income the earned income of a spouse of 

a member of the Armed Forces of the United States 

serving in a combat zone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening Amer5 ica’s Military Families Act of 2007’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1086 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR EARNED IN2 COME OF A SPOUSE OF A MEMBER OF THE 

3 ARMED FORCES SERVING IN A COMBAT 

4 ZONE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 112 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to certain combat zone com7 pensation of members of the Armed Forces) is amended 

8 by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (d) 

9 and (e), respectively, and by inserting after subsection (b) 

10 the following new subsection: 

11 ‘‘(c) SPOUSES OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED

12 FORCES.— 

13 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an individual 

14 who is the spouse of a member of the Armed Forces 

15 of the United States during any part of any month 

16 during the taxable year, gross income does not in17 clude the earned income of such individual for such 

18 month if the compensation of such member was ex19 cluded from gross income for such month by reason 

20 of subsection (a), (b), or (e). 

21 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—The amount excluded under 

22 paragraph (1) for any month shall not exceed the 

23 maximum amount specified in subsection (b) for 

24 such month. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HR 1086 IH

1 ‘‘(3) EARNED INCOME.—For purposes of para2 graph (1), the term ‘earned income’ has the meaning 

3 given such term by section 911(d)(2). 

4 ‘‘(4) MARITAL STATUS.—For purposes of this 

5 subsection, marital status shall be determined under 

6 section 7703, except that subsection (a)(1) thereof 

7 shall be applied on a monthly basis instead of an 

8 taxable year basis.’’. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

10 (1) The heading for section 112 of such Code 

11 is amended to read as follows: 

12 ‘‘SEC. 112. CERTAIN COMBAT ZONE-RELATED COMPENSA13 TION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.’’. 

14 (2) The item relating to section 112 in the table 

15 of sections for part III of subchapter B of chapter 

16 1 of such Code is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘Sec. 112. Certain combat zone-related compensation of members of the Armed 

Forces.’’. 

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

19 December 31, 2006. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
KINGS ROAD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
                             A Delaware corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kings Road Entertainment, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Geraldine Blecker, Chief Executive Officer, and I, H. Martin DeFrank, President
and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authentication, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed from within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kings Road
Entertainment, Inc., and will be retained by Kings Road Entertainment, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date:  October 31, 2003                         /s/ Geraldine Blecker
                                                -------------------------------
                                                By: Geraldine Blecker
                                                Its:  Chief Executive Officer



Date:  October 31, 2003                         /s/ H. Martin DeFrank
                                                -------------------------------
                                                By: H. Martin DeFrank
                                                Its:  Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 29, 2010 

p0129 

Order 

 

January 29, 2010 

139839 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139839 

 COA: 293293 

Bay CC: 06-010508-FH; 

08-010998-FH 

TIMOTHY ALAN LEACH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 9, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IA 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 74 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to marriage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. GOHMERT introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to marriage. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by conventions in three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 74 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘Marriage in the United States shall consist only of 

3 a legal union of one man and one woman.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electronic
Tele-Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey M. Nigl, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Jeffrey M. Nigl
-------------------
Jeffrey M. Nigl
Chief Financial Officer
November 11, 2002
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: October 16, 2014 D-64-14 

 

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN

VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW

§ 468-a.

COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STANDARDS, ON MOTION

Petitioner;

JOHN Y. KIM,

Respondent.

(Attorney Registration No. 4124079)

 

Calendar Date: August 11, 2014

Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ.

 

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards,

Albany, for petitioner.

John Y. Kim, Wadsworth, Ohio, respondent pro se.

 

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in

2003, was suspended by this Court's order dated January 30, 2014

for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements

of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]).
-2- D-64-14 

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he

has complied with the attorney registration requirements of

Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of

the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object

to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered

reinstated, effective immediately.

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ.,

concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is

further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and

counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0545

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHARLES GALEN LANE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Robin Lee is 

granted an extension of time to and including January 16, 2024, within

which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 19 2023

12/19/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0545
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1748

JAMES BEGGS; JOYCE BEGGS,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY; CUNNINGHAM LINDSEY U.S. INC.,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, d/b/a 

Assurant, et al.,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:17-cv-00110-AWA-DEM)

Submitted: June 29, 2022 Decided: June 28, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Beggs, Joyce Beggs, Appellants Pro Se.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1748 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1748 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

James and Joyce Beggs (“Appellants”) appeal the district court’s order denying their 

postjudgment motion for reconsideration. Limiting our review to the issues raised in 

Appellants’ informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 

(4th Cir. 2014), we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm the district court’s order. Beggs v. Am. Banker Ins. Co., No. 4:17-cv-00110-

AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. June 29, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1748 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/28/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
II 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 490 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow refunds of Federal 

motor fuel excise taxes on fuels used in mobile mammography vehicles. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2013 

Mr. HELLER (for himself and Mr. VITTER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow refunds of Federal motor fuel excise taxes on fuels used 

in mobile mammography vehicles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mobile Mammography 

5 Promotion Act of 2013’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 490 IS

1 SEC. 2. REFUNDS OF FEDERAL MOTOR FUEL EXCISE TAXES 

2 FOR FUEL USED IN MOBILE MAMMOGRAPHY 

3 VEHICLES. 

4 (a) REFUNDS.—Section 6427 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting after sub6 section (f) the following new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(g) FUELS USED IN MOBILE MAMMOGRAPHY VEHI8 CLES.—Except as provided in subsection (k), if any fuel 

9 on which tax was imposed by section 4041 or 4081 is used 

10 in any highway vehicle designed exclusively to provide mo11 bile mammography services to patients within such vehi12 cle, the Secretary shall pay (without interest) to the ulti13 mate purchaser of such fuel an amount equal to the aggre14 gate amount of the tax imposed on such fuel.’’. 

15 (b) EXEMPTION FROM RETAIL TAX.—Section 4041 

16 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by add17 ing at the end the following new subsection: 

18 ‘‘(n) FUELS USED IN MOBILE MAMMOGRAPHY VEHI19 CLES.—No tax shall be imposed under this section on any 

20 liquid sold for use in, or used in, any highway vehicle de21 signed exclusively to provide mobile mammography serv22 ices to patients within such vehicle.’’. 

23 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

24 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

25 of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
761 A.2d 139

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Keemen COPELAND, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Oct. 27, 2000.

Christopher D. Warren, Philadelphia, for petitioner.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 27th day of October 2000, the petition for allowance of appeal is GRANTED, limited to the issue of:

> Whether the petitioner’s constitutional right to confrontation was violated by introduction into evidence of admissions made by a non-testifying co-defendant?
{00035853.DOC}

SF1 1652475v.2

**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that: 

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2011-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports"); 

2.

Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.

I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5.

All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following 

unaffiliated parties:  U.S. Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee. 

Date:  March 26, 2013 

  /s/   Brian T. Stevens

Name: Brian T. Stevens Title: Vice President and Controller                             (senior officer of Servicer in charge of servicing function)