alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2011-4 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.



/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

September 20, 2013
News United States Air Force
 Last MC-130P Combat Shadows in the Pacific retirePublished April 23, 2015
                        
                        By Airman 1st Class Stephen G. Eigel
                        
                        
                        18th Wing Public Affairs
                **KADENA AIR BASE, Japan (AFNS) --**
                The 17th Special Operations Squadron sent off the final two MC-130P Combat Shadows in the Pacific Air Forces to retire on April 15.The 17th SOS highlighted the beginning of the MC-130P Combat Shadow retirement with one final formation flight on Oct. 16, 2014, at Kadena Air Base, but now they have sent their last ones to the “boneyard” at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona."Today is bittersweet as we say goodbye to these amazing aircraft," said Lt. Col. Nathan T. Colunga, the 17th SOS commander. "I have spent less time in the MC-130P than most, only 11 years, but these aircraft have executed every time we've truly needed them to over the last 50. The MC-130P's legacy will not be forgotten as we mark this historic moment in the lineage of the 17th SOS, Air Force Special Operations Command and the Combat Shadow community at large."The Pacific-based Combat Shadows alone have supported more than a dozen named operations. From combat missions in Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom to humanitarian assistance disaster relief operations across Asia, the Combat Shadow left its mark in special operations history."I have flown in the MC-130P since 2000, and it has taken me to all corners of the globe in peacetime and in combat," said Maj. Curtis P. Reinhart, a 17th SOS navigator. "The Combat Shadow has been the workhorse of AFSOC and it will be emotional flying it to its final resting place.  I'll be sad to see it go, but it has earned a well-deserved retirement."From providing helicopter air-to-air refueling to conducting long-range support of Special Operations Forces, the MC-130P Combat Shadow has provided a critical service to the U.S. military for nearly 50 years.The MC-130P Combat Shadows built with 1960s technology are being replaced by the new MC-130J Commando II with cutting-edge technology.Japan 



PACAF 



MC-130P Combat Shadow 



retire 



Aircraft 



C-130 



Kadena AB
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of Inspectorate America Corporation, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, Inspectorate America Corporation, 37 Panagrossi Circle, East Haven, CT 06512, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the website listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​.*

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of Inspectorate America Corporation, as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on May 7, 2010. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for May 2013.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anthony Malana, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: September 13, 2010.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. 2010-23475 Filed 9-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
583 A.2d 319

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ADRIANA KARAGIANNIS.

February 6, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.1.4



                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                             RENAL CARE GROUP, INC.

     RENAL CARE GROUP, INC., a corporation organized and existing under and
by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That on April 16, 1999 the Board of Directors of the Corporation
approved a proposed amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring said amendment to be in the best
interests of the Corporation and its stockholders and directing that the
proposed amendment be submitted to the stockholders of the Corporation for their
consideration and approval at the next annual meeting of stockholders. The
proposal amended Section 4.1 of Article IV of the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation by deleting such Section 4.1 in
its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

                  "Section 4.1. Total Number of Shares of Stock. The total
         number of shares of stock of all classes that the Company shall have
         authority to issue is 100,000,000. The authorized capital stock is
         divided into 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $.01 par value per
         share (the `Preferred Stock'), and 90,000,000 shares of Common Stock,
         $.01 par value per share (the `Common Stock')."

         SECOND: That thereafter on June 2, 1999, the stockholders of the
Corporation approved the proposed amendment at the annual meeting of
stockholders.

         THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Renal Care Group, Inc. has caused this Certificate
of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be signed
by its duly authorized officer this 8th day of June, 1999


                              RENAL CARE GROUP, INC.




                              By:    /s/ Douglas B. Chappell
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                              Name:  Douglas B. Chappell
                                    -------------------------------------------
                              Title: Senior Vice President and Secretary
                                    -------------------------------------------
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

muiteb ~tates ~ourt of §ppeals 

for !be jf eberal ~ircuit 

OUTSIDE THE BOX INNOVATIONS, LLC (DOING 

BUSINESS AS UNION RICH USA), 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

and 

BONAKA LIMITED, BONAKA PLASTIC 

MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., AND 

UNION RICH PLASTIC FACTORY, LTD., 

Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

CHRISTOPHER URE, MATT WILLIAMS, TERRY 

KINSKEY, AND LYNN MARTINEAU, 

Counterclaim Defendants, 

v. 

TRAVEL CADDY, INC., 

Defendant/ Counterclaimant-Appellant. 

and 

ROOSTER PRODUCTS (DOING BUSINESS AS THE 

ROOSTER GROUP), 

Defendant / Counterclaimant. 

2009-1171 
OUTSIDE THE BOX v. TRAVEL CADDY 2 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Georgia in case no. 1:05-CV-2482, 

Senior Judge Orinda D. Evans. 

OUTSIDE THE BOX INNOVATIONS, LLC (DOING 

BUSINESS AS UNION RICH USA), 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

and 

BONAKA LIMITED, BONAKA PLASTIC 

MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., AND 

UNION RICH PLASTIC FACTORY, LTD., 

Counterclaim Defendants, 

and 

CHRISTOPHER URE, MATT WILLIAMS, TERRY 

KINSKEY, AND LYNN MARTINEAU, 

Counterclaim Defendants, 

v. 

TRAVEL CADDY, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

ROOSTER PRODUCTS (DOING BUSINESS AS THE 

ROOSTER GROUP), 

Defendant. 

2009-1558 
3 OUTSIDE THE BOX v. TRAVEL CADDY 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Georgia in case no. 1:05-CV-2482, 

Senior Judge Orinda D. Evans. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 

Outside the Box Innovations, LLC moves without opposition to dismiss its appeal, 2009-1558. Travel Caddy, 

Inc. moves without opposition for an extension of time, 

until March 24,2011, to file its reply brief in 2009-1171. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion to dismiss 2009-1558 is granted. Each 

side shall bear its own costs in 2009-1558. 

(2) The revised official caption for 2009-1171 IS reflected above. 

(3) Travel Caddy's motion for an extension of time is 

granted. 

MAR 08 2011 

Date 

cc: Robert Byer, Esq. 

Timothy P. Maloney, Esq. 

Jeffrey D. Mills, Esq. 

FOR THE COURT 

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

U.S. coUJ~~JPEALS FOIl 

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

MAR 08 lOll 

JAN HORBAlY 

CLERK 
OUTSIDE THE BOX v. TRAVEL CADDY 4 

s20 

Issued As A Mandate (as to 2009-1558 only): 

MAR 08 2011
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 123 

To authorize appropriations for the San Gabriel Basin Restoration Fund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. DREIER (for himself, Ms. SOLIS, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. 

SCHIFF, and Mrs. NAPOLITANO) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

JUNE 25, 2007 

The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure discharged 

JUNE 25, 2007 

Rereferred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize appropriations for the San Gabriel Basin 

Restoration Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SAN GABRIEL BASIN RESTORATION FUND. 

4 Section 110(d)(1) of division B of the Miscellaneous 

5 Appropriations Act, 2001 (114 Stat. 2763A–223), as en6 acted into law by section 1(a)(4) of the Consolidated ApVerDate Aug 31 2005 23:47 Jun 28, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H123.RCH H123

ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

HR 123 RCH 

1 propriations Act, 2001 (Public Law 106–554), is amended 

2 by striking ‘‘$85,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$135,000,000’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
583 A.2d 341

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSEPH ROTANTE.

March 20, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
EX-10.7




 Exhibit 10.7 

ENVIVA HOLDINGS, LP 
 7200
Wisconsin Ave, Suite 1100 
 Bethesda, MD 20814 

March 7, 2014 
 Enviva, LP 

7200 Wisconsin Ave, Suite 1100 
 Bethesda, MD 20814 

 

	Re:	Management Services Agreement 

 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Reference is made to that certain Management Services Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2012, between us, as Service Provider and you (the
“Management Services Agreement”); capitalized terms used in this letter agreement having the meanings set forth in the Management Services Agreement. 

Notwithstanding any provision contained in Section 3 of the Management Services Agreement to the contrary, we hereby agree that: (i) the amount set forth in
Section 3 of the Management Services Agreement (as increased pursuant to the terms thereof) as the Annual Fee shall be deemed to be the maximum Annual Fee payable pursuant to the Management Services Agreement; (ii) the Annual Fee shall be that
amount, not to exceed the cap set forth in Section 3 of the Management Services Agreement, as you and we shall agree from time to time in writing; and (iii) the Annual Fee for 2013 was $5,800,000. 

The laws of the State of New York shall govern the validity, construction, enforcement and interpretation of this letter agreement. 

 

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	ENVIVA HOLDINGS, LP
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Stephen Reeves

	 Name:  Stephen Reeves

	 Title:    Executive Vice President and CFO



  

			
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	
	ENVIVA, LP
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Stephen Reeves

	 Name:  Stephen Reeves

	 Title:    Executive Vice President and CFO
News United States Air Force
 Australian air force pilot flies first partner F-35 sortiePublished May 18, 2015
                        
                        By Senior Airman Grace Lee
                        
                        
                        56th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. (AFNS) --**
                A pilot with the Royal Australian Air Force made history May 14, by flying the first RAAF F-35A Lightning II sortie at Luke Air Force Base.RAAF Maj. Andrew Jackson, the squadron leader for the 61st Fighter Squadron and the first F-35 senior national representative at Luke, was the first Australian pilot to fly the fifth-generation fighter.Although this was another milestone for the RAAF, for Jackson, this flight was also about building his experience and competence in the aircraft over the short term."My focus is on representing the RAAF as a valuable partner in the F-35 enterprise," Jackson said. "Hopefully I can contribute in some way to the work that's already taken place to help ensure a smooth transition from the A-18 to the F-35A. It's very exciting to finally be at Luke with the 61st Fighter Squadron and to get to fly an RAAF F-35A. Whilst I'm told that all the F-35s are the same, it's awesome to finally go flying in a jet that has 'Skippy' painted on the side."With the sortie completed, RAAF personnel can forge ahead and advance in their mission at Luke."This marks a major milestone for partner operations here at Luke, as the next phase of operations," said RAAF Maj. Nathan Draper, a 61st Aircraft Maintenance Unit participant maintenance liaison officer. "We have been on the ground supporting the mission with our jets and now one of our instructor pilots will also contribute to this team in one of our aircraft."The RAAF's future goals include not only helping train future F-35 pilots and gaining experience in flying it, but understanding what goes into maintaining the aircraft."The future is promising with the F-35," Draper said. "With each new update to the ground based support systems comes enhanced capability and supportability features. We will continue to define and refine the baseline configuration and move toward initial operating capability for each of the partners and services."With the anticipated sortie accomplished Jackson said he is glad to be at Luke."We're looking forward to training at Luke for a number of reasons -- it's been a long way to move with my family, but the phenomenal hospitality and generosity afforded to us by both the base and local community has made this move easy," Jackson said. "Combine that with the amazing weather, airspace and proud history of partner training at Luke and you have an unbeatable combination. There's nowhere that myself and the other Australian pilots would rather be training on the F-35A, than (at) Luke Air Force Base."Royal Australian air force 



Joint Training 



Luke AFB 



AETC 



F-35 



F-35 Lightning II
583 A.2d 304

#### MARIE ABBOUD v. DOMINICK VISCOMI, D.D.S.

January 17, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
#### East Texas Fire Ins. Co. v. Joseph Templeton and Wife.

(No. 2946.)

Appeal from Bowie County.

Whitaker & Bonner, counsel for appellant.

Todd & Hudgins, counsel for appellees.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 424. *Limitation; institution of suit does not stop the running of, unless, etc.; case stated.*Appellees instituted this suit against appellant upon a policy of fire insurance, and recovered judgment for the amount of the policy and for costs. The fire occurred February 9, 1885. The petition was filed February 6, 1886. Citation was issued April 11, 1881. There is a stipulation in the policy of insurance to the effect that an action thereon should be barred unless suit should be instituted within twelve months from the date of the policy. Appellant pleaded this stipulation in bar. *Held:*The action was brought within twelve months after the date of the fire, but the citation was not issued until more than two years after *495the fire and more than one year after the petition was filed. The presumption must obtain that citation was withheld by order of the plaintiffs. The object of said stipulation in the policy is to enable the company to meet the case while the facts are fresh in the memory of the witnesses and are accessible to both parties. After the petition was filed no steps were taken by the plaintiffs to obtain service of citation for a period of fourteen months, during which time the cause was continued from term to term of the court. No excuse is shown for this want of diligence. These facts show gross negligence on the part of the plaintiffs in the prosecution of their suit, and the filing of the petition did not operate to stop the running of the limitation prescribed by the contract. Appellant’s plea in bar should have been sustained. [Hoffman v. Cage, 31 Tex. 598; Maddox v. Humphries, 30 Tex. 494.]

December 12, 1888.

Keversed and remanded.

[Judge Willson

dissents, his opinion being that the filing of the petition was the commencement of the action and stopped the running of limitation, and that the failure to issue citation in the suit, there being no express direction by the plaintiffs not to issue citation, did not operate to keep the limitation in motion. [R. S. art. 1181; Scoby v. Sweat, 28 Tex. 713; 1 App. C. C. § 609.] In many of the states, by statutory enactment, a suit is commenced by the issuance of a citation, and where this is the practice limitation is not interrupted until the issuance of citation. [Wood on Lim. §§ 289, 290.] But our statute makes the filing of the petition, and not the issuance of the citation, the commencement of the action.]
<PAGE>
EXHBIT 10.27

                          LA JOLLA COVE INVESTORS, INC.
                          1795 UNION STREET, 3rd FLOOR
                         SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94123
                            TELEPHONE: (415) 409-8703
                            FACSIMILE: (415) 409-8704
                            E-MAIL: LJCI@PACBELL.NET
LA JOLLA                      www.ljcinvestors.com                 SAN FRANCISCO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                December 12, 2003

Mr. Dean Weber
One Voice Technologies, Inc.
6333 Greenwich Drive, Suite 240
San Diego, CA 92122


Re: Registration Statement Legal and Accounting Fees

Dear Dean:

This letter will set forth our agreement for the payment of the attorneys' and
accounting fees necessary for the filing of a registration statement by One
Voice Technologies, Inc. ("One Voice") to cover, among other things, the shares
of One Voice common stock necessary for the 7 3/4% Convertible Debenture and the
warrants issued to La Jolla Cove Investors, Inc. ("LJCI").

Under the Securities Purchase Agreement, LJCI is to advance $150,000 to One
Voice upon closing. It is agreed that LJCI will retain $50,000 of the initial
advance for the payment of legal and accounting fees for the filing of the
Registration Statement for the Conversion Shares and the Warrant Shares. The
$50,000 will be paid to the attorneys and accountants once the Registration
Statement has been declared effective. At LJCI's sole discretion, some of the
$50,000 may be paid to the attorneys and accountants prior to the Registration
Statement being declared effective. Any amount remaining after payment of the
legal and accounting fees shall be advanced to One Voice.

One Voice agrees that it is responsible for the payment of legal and accounting
fees, if any, over and above the $50,000 covered herein.

If this letter correctly reflects our agreement regarding the payment of One
Voice's attorneys' and accounting fees for the preparation and filing of the
Registration Statement, please acknowledge your agreement by signing below.

Sincerely,



Travis W. Huff
Portfolio Manager


One Voice Technologies, Inc.

By: __________________________

Title: ________________________