alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H5630-H5631]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                  THE UNITED STATES-JAPAN AUTO DISPUTE

  (Ms. KAPTUR asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Ms. KAPTUR. Mr. Speaker, what is wrong with this picture? Regardless 
of the yen-dollar exchange rate, United States market share of the 
Japanese [[Page H5631]] auto and auto part market has remained flat for 
nearly two decades. As a matter of fact, the import share for all 
foreign manufacturers in Japan has remained stuck at 4.6 percent for 
autos and 2.6 percent for auto parts.
  The gigantic United States automotive deficit with Japan defies all 
economic rationale. In 1985, when the yen was 240 to the dollar, the 
United States had an automotive deficit with Japan of $23.9 billion. 
Now, with the yen hovering around 80 to the dollar--a 300-percent 
decrease in the dollar's value against the yen--our automotive trade 
deficit is on track to break last year's record of $37 billion.
  As this chart shows, the facts are on our side. The United States has 
a trade surplus in the automotive sector with the rest of the world. 
Isn't it time for Japan to play fair?

                          ____________________
```
422 A.2d 1176

#### Commonwealth ex rel. Reider, Appellant, v. Reider. Appeal of Sharon Reider.

Reargument Denied Jan. 14, 1980.

Argued March 20, 1979.

Albert C. Oehrle, for appellant; Mark C. Schultz, for appellee.

Before VAN der VOORT, HESTER and WIEAND, JJ.

*646The order of May 22, 1978 is modified to be retroactive to March 31, 1977, and as so modified, the order is affirmed.

HESTER, J., filed a memorandum dissenting statement.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Trans  Energy,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2005,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Clarence E. Smith , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/   CLARENCE E. SMITH
-------------------------------------
Clarence E. Smith
Chief Executive Officer
June 20, 2005

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned officers, Wayne M. Fortun, Chief Executive Officer of
Hutchinson Technology Incorporated, a Minnesota corporation (the "Company"), and
John A. Ingleman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
         quarterly period ended June 29, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with
         the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
         Act of 1934, as amended; and

                  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

Date:  August 11, 2003                  /s/Wayne M. Fortun
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Wayne M. Fortun
                                        Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 11, 2003                  /s/John A. Ingleman
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John A. Ingleman
                                        Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM THE TRANS ENERGY, INC. FINANCIAL
               STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS
               QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
               FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                      19,035
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              350,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                 9,700
<INVENTORY>                                330,515
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           690,563
<PP&E>                                   6,681,204
<DEPRECIATION>                           1,557,570
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           7,133,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    1,859,850
<BONDS>                                  2,788,008
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     3,239
<OTHER-SE>                               6,202,559
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             7,133,602
<SALES>                                  2,307,004
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         2,307,004
<CGS>                                    1,824,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,824,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           724,631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         421,763
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (624,094)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             20,000
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             (604,094)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.19)
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1317

TITO LEMONT KNOX , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ELIZABETH G. MAGERA, US Probation Officer in her Individual and official capacity; SERGIO A. SANCHEZ, Psychiatric in his Individual and official capacity , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 6:20

- cv - 00228

- HMH )

Submitted : July 21, 2020 Decided: July 23, 2020

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Tito Lemont Knox, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tito Lemont Knox appeals the district court’s order s dismissing his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed eral Bureau of
Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The district court referred this cas e to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (201 8 ). After informing Knox of several pleading deficiencies and allowing him to amend his complaint, t he magistrate judge recommended that the complaint as amended be dismissed for failure to state a claim. The magistrate judge further advised Knox that failure to file timely , specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v

. Duffy , 858 F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 846

- 47 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 , 154

- 55 (1985). Although Knox received proper notice and filed timely objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation, he has waived appellate review because , as the district court ruled, the objections were not specific to the particularized legal recommendations made by the magistrate judge. See Martin , 858 F.3d at 245 (holding that, “to preserve for appeal an issue in a magistrate judge’s report, a party
must o bject to the finding or recommendation on that issue with sufficient specificity so as reasonably to alert the district court of the true ground for the objection” (internal quotation marks omitted)).3 Accordingly, we affirm the amended judgment of the dist rict court

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON, DC 20549

                                  FORM 10-KSB/A

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

       ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES
                              EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                   FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998

                        COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-22855


                       NEW DIRECTIONS MANUFACTURING, INC.
        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

            NEVADA                                      86-0671974
(State or other Jurisdiction of             (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 Incorporation or Organization)

                 2940 W. WILLETTA STREET, PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85009
               (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

                                 (602) 352-1165
                (Issuer's telephone number, including area code)




THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS AMENDMENT IS TO PROVIDE THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
THAT WAS INADVERTENTLY OMITTED WITH THE PREVIOUS FILING.
<PAGE>   2
                                 SIGNATURE PAGE


      In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.


                                       NEW DIRECTIONS MANUFACTURING, INC.



Date: October 15, 1998                 /s/ Donald A.Metke
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       DONALD A. METKE
                                       President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
                                       Financial Officer, Chief Operating
                                       Officer, Director
<PAGE>   3
                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


EXHIBIT 27 - FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 27 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 27

Providing for the reappointment of Roger W. Sant as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2007

  Mr. Becerra (for himself, Ms. Matsui, and Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the reappointment of Roger W. Sant as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,
  That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the 
United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of 
the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than Members of 
Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the term of Roger W. 
Sant of the District of Columbia, is filled by reappointment of the 
incumbent for a term of 6 years, effective October 25, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K/A

 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014

 

Commission File No. 333-177532

 

KAYA HOLDINGS, INC.  

 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in itscharter)

 

 

305 South Andrews Avenue, Suite 209, FortLauderdale, Florida, 33301

(Address of principal executive offices) (ZipCode)

 

954/534-7895

(Registrant’s telephone number, includingarea code)

 

Securities registered under Section 12(b)of the Exchange Act: None

 

Name of each exchange on which registered– Not applicable

 

Securities registered under Section 12(g)of the Exchange Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant isa well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. [ ] Yes [x] No

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant isnot required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. [ ] Yes [ ] No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to suchfiling requirements for the past 90 days. [x] Yes [ ] No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registranthas submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submittedand posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrantwas required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes [x] No

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of RegulationS-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or informationstatements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a largeaccelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “largeaccelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Exhibit 10.13.1  


[AET
FILMS LOGO] 


December 11,
2003 


Sent via FEDEX


Mr. Thomas
E. Williams

40 Foster Street

Marblehead, MA 01945 



Dear
Mr. Williams: 


        Reference
is hereby made to the letter agreement dated September 30, 2002 (the "Letter Agreement") between you and Applied Extrusion Technologies, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), with respect to your separation from the Company. Terms defined in the Letter Agreement, and not otherwise defined herein, are used herein with the meanings so defined. 


        You
currently hold the following stock options issued by the Company and exercisable by you until the Benefits Termination Date ("Options"):   



	No.
	 	Grant Date
	 	Shares
	 	Exercise Price

	1	 	03/23/95	 	150,000	 	$	8.25
	2	 	02/02/98	 	50,000	 	$	7.00
	3	 	03/15/99	 	75,000	 	$	5.56
	4	 	03/01/00	 	50,000	 	$	8.00
	5	 	01/08/01	 	75,000	 	$	2.13
	6	 	06/01/01	 	75,000	 	$	5.88






        Options
numbered 1, 2, 4 and 6 in the above table are referred to herein as the "Relinquished Options", and Options numbered 3 and 5 in the above table are referred to herein as the
"Extended Options". 


        You
hereby tender the Relinquished Options and all documents in your possession evidencing the Relinquished Options to the Company for cancellation and, in consideration therefor, the
Company hereby extends the expiration date of each of the Extended Options to the end of such Extended Option's latest expiration date as provided in such Extended Option as originally granted. 



        This
Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between you and the Company and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous communications, agreements and understandings, whether written or
oral, with respect to the Options, excluding only the Letter Agreement as amended and supplemented
hereby, the Employment Agreement, the Options and your obligations with respect to the securities of the Company, all of which shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their terms. 


        This
Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same document. This
Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 





 



        If
the terms of this Agreement are acceptable to you, please sign, date and return it to me as soon as possible. The enclosed copy of this letter, which you should also sign and date, is
for your records. 



	 	 	Sincerely,
	

 	
 	

APPLIED EXTRUSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
	

 	
 	

By:	

/s/  DAVID N. TERHUNE      
 David N. Terhune

President





Accepted
and agreed: 



	Signature:	 	/s/  THOMAS E WILLIAMS      
	 	 
	Date:	 	12/10/03
	 	 




2
2012 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

10-18-2012 

# Dh a n y R in a s tut i v . Att or ne y Ge ne r al U nit ed S t a t es

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al

D ock e t N o . 12-1978

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2012

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2012 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du

. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" Dh a n y R in as tut i v . Att or ney Ge ne r al U

nit e d S t a t e s " (2012). 2012 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 261. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2012/261

### NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 12

- 1978

___________ DHANY DINAR RINASTUTI
, Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
, Respondent

____________________________________ On Pe tition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Agency No. A088

- 649

- 516 ) Immigration Judge: Honorable Rosalind K. Malloy

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

October 17, 2012 Before: S LOVITER, CHAGARES and GREENBERG
, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed : October 18, 2012 )

_________ OPINION

_________ PER CURIAM
Dhany Rinastuti, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the
agency’s denial of relief. This is the companion case to C.A. N o. 12

- 1977; Rinastuti is
the partner of Ufuq Abror, the petitioner in that matter, and the relevant facts and issues2



### in both matters are identical

. Rinastuti fears potential persecution in Indonesia on
account of a possible familial veto of her desired ma rriage to Abror, and also worries
about societal disapproval of her children being born out of wedlock. For substantially

the same reasons that we recited in 12

- 1977, however, Rinastuti has failed to show any basis to disturb the agency’s final order of r emoval. W e must therefore deny this petition

for review. 1

1 

### We exercise jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , as limited by 8 U.S.C. § § 1158(a)(3) and 1252(d)(1)

.
Management Incentive Compensation Plans



 EXHIBIT 10.4 
  
 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS 
  
 (SUMMARY) 
  
 The Registrant has established a Directors’ Incentive Compensation Plan and an Officers’ Incentive Compensation Plan pursuant to which portions of
directors’ fees and certain officers’ cash awards, respectively, are determined based upon various performance measures of the Registrant’s operating subsidiaries. Target levels of performance goals are determined by the
Registrant’s Board of Directors on an annual basis.