alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Tuskegee Airman engages with today's generation of AirmenPublished Oct. 31, 2016
                        
                        By Mark Wyatt
                        
                        
                        66th Air Base Group Public Affairs
                **HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE, Mass. (AFNS) --**
                Before heading into Boston Oct. 27 to speak at an event co-hosted by the New England Tuskegee Airmen Chapter, retired Col. Charles E. McGee, a Tuskegee Airman, met with several Airmen here.
McGee said he appreciates the opportunity he has to meet with this generation of Airmen.
“I think it’s important to know where we’ve been, because there are some things we don’t want to repeat,” he said. “It’s good to be part of that education, to pass on the lessons to our young people because they are the future.”
McGee served on active duty for 30 years, retiring in 1973. During that time, he became a command pilot with more than 6,000 flying hours and 400 combat missions in three major conflicts, World War II, Korean War and Vietnam War.
The Tuskegee Airmen, named after Tuskegee Army Airfield in Alabama, received pilot and aircraft maintenance training during WW II. The Tuskegee Airmen were not just flyers, but also radio operators, navigators, bombardiers, aircraft maintainers, support staff, instructors and all the personnel who kept the planes in the air.
Senior Airman Alfredo Maldonado, a personnelist assigned to the 66th Force Support Squadron, was one of the Airman who were able to talk with McGee.
“I came to learn more about the Tuskegee Airmen, to learn more about the legacy of these pioneers,” Maldonado said. “What they accomplished is more impactful when heard in person by someone who experienced it firsthand. I’m glad I had this opportunity and thankful he could spend some time with us.” 
McGee’s message for each of the Airmen he spoke with was to work hard for what they want. He discussed what current Airmen could learn from the experiences of Tuskegee Airmen.
“We (Tuskegee Airmen) could have bowed our head and said ‘they don’t like me, they don’t want me’ and gone off into the corner,” he said. “What would that have accomplished? We wouldn’t have served our country nor dispelled the biases that had been part of the policy that said because of skin color we didn’t have talent.”
McGee said he has been most proud of the opportunity he had to serve his country.
“Being able to serve our country was certainly a big step during that time,” he said. “Today that’s what we’re (Tuskegee Airmen) all about, providing opportunity and encouragement to our young folks.”
McGee, as well as retired Lt. Cols. Enoch Woodhouse and George Hardy, each Tuskegee Airman themselves, was in the area to participate in “A Conversation with History” at the University of Massachusetts in Boston. 
McGee offered this advice to Airmen serving in the Air Force today.
“Believe that you can,” he said. “If you have doubts about your ability you’re shorting yourself. You’ve got to believe and then be willing to go for it.”heritage 



AFMC 



Tuskegee Airmen 



Hanscom AFB
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement

Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned, John A. Elwood, the Chief Financial Officer of Meade Instruments Corp. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, hereby certifies that:

(i) the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended February 28, 2011, as amended by Amendment No. 1, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 5, 2012



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ JOHN A. ELWOOD     
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Vincent James HUSSEY *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 00-269

20 S.W.3d 271

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered March 23, 2000

*G.B. “Bing” Colvin, III,*for appellant.

No response.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Vincent James Hussey, by his attorney, G. B. “Bing” Colvin, III, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. *See Terry v. State, 272*Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); *In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases,*295 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. *In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases,*265 Ark. 964 (1979).
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5387]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

              REPUBLICAN BUDGET CLOSES DOOR OF OPPORTUNITY

  (Mr. DURBIN asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
  Mr. DURBIN. Mr. Speaker, most American families cannot leave their 
children a fortune. What we try to leave them is a set of values and an 
opportunity.
  Last week, the Republican budget resolution closed the door of 
opportunity for millions of American kids. The Republican budget 
resolution cut college student loans by $18 billion. That is right. At 
a time when America needs a well-educated generation to lead us into 
the next century, at a time when our kids need the opportunity for 
education for a good-paying job, the Gingrich Republicans make the 
biggest cut in student loans in our Nation's history.
  And why have the Republicans done this? Why are the Republicans 
increasing a student's cost of financing a college education by an 
average of $5,000? Because the Republican student loan cuts fill the 
Republican piggy bank to pay for tax breaks for the privileged few.
  Cutting college student loans may be the Gingrich view of America. 
How does your family feel?

                          ____________________
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

KEVIN EPPERSON

,

Defendant Below

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below

Appellee. § § § No. 9, 2015 § § § Court Below

— Superior Court § of the State of Delaware, § in and for New Castle Coun ty § Cr. ID 9408009291 § §

Submitted: January 16, 2015 Decided: February 12 , 201 5

Before HOLLAND

, VALIHURA

, and VAUGHN

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 12 th day of February 2015

, upon consideration of the appellant’s

request for leave to file an appeal from the Superior Court’s denial of his twent y

first motion for postconviction relief and his response to the Court’s rule to show

cause why the appeal should not be dismissed, it appears to the Court that:

(1) The appellant, Kevin Epperso n, was convicted by a Superior Court

jury in 1996 of Kidnapping in the First Degree and Unlawful Sexual Contact in the

First Degree. He was sentenced as a habitual offender to serve fifty

- two years in

prison followed by a period of probation. His convict ions and sentence were

affirmed on direct appeal.2

(2) In 2006, following his appeal from the Superior Court’s denial of his

eighth postconviction motion, this Court noted that Epperson’s repetitive filings

were frivolous and constituted an abuse of the ju dicial process. We, therefore,

enjoined Epperson from filing any future claims in this Court without first

obtaining leave of the Court and filing a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in

compliance with 10 Del. C. § 8803.

(3) Epperson filed his curren t request seeking leave to appeal from the

Super ior Court’s denial of his twenty

- first Rule 61 motion. Epperson contends that

his twent y

- first petition, which challenged the legality of the indictment against

him, raises a constitutional issue that has ne ver bee n addressed on the merits before

by any court and is not procedurally barred.

(4) Epperson is incorrect. Having review ed the Superior Court’s

December 9, 2014 order and Epperson’s response to the notice to show cause , we

find it manifest that the claim r aised in Epperson’s twenty

- first Rule 61 petition is

procedurally barred and frivolous. His repetitive filings constitute an abuse of

judicial process . H is latest appeal is not approved for filing

.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Epperso n’s appeal papers

are STRICKEN

, and this matter is SUMMARILY DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-16-00485-CR

Salvador ZARATE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-CRS-402

Honorable Jose Luis Garza, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 28, 2016

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

The clerk’s record was due to be filed in this appeal on September 8, 2016. On September 

8, 2016, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record stating the clerk’s record had not 

been filed because appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for 

preparing the record and appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. 

On September 9, 2016, appellant was ordered to provide written proof to this court by 

September 19, 2016 that either: (1) the clerk’s fee had been paid or arrangements had been made 
04-16-00485-CR

- 2 -

to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee.1 The 

order stated if appellant failed to respond within the time provided, this appeal would be dismissed 

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). Appellant did not respond to this court’s 

order. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

 1 The trial court’s certificate of notice of appeal shows that appellant is represented on appeal by a retained attorney.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.26


                               THOMAS J. MAZZARISI




December 12, 2003


JAG Media Holdings, Inc.
6965 S.W. 18th Street, Suite B13
Boca Raton, FL  33433


Re:      Promissory Note dated April 1, 2002 in the principal amount of $200,000
         between JAG Media Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a JagNotes.com Inc.), as
         borrower, and Thomas J. Mazzarisi, as lender, with a maturity date of
         December 17, 2003 ("Promissory Note")

Gentlemen:

This will serve to confirm that the "Maturity Date" of the Promissory Note is
hereby extended from December 17, 2003 to the earlier of (i) January 31, 2004 or
(ii) the effective date of a "Change in Control" as that term is defined in the
Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended.

Except for the foregoing changes, the Promissory Note remains unchanged and in
full force and effect.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Thomas J. Mazzarisi

Thomas J. Mazzarisi
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 23, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H5461]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Colorado [Mr. McInnis] is recognized for 5 minutes.

  [Mr. McINNIS addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter 
in the Extensions of Remarks.]

                          ____________________
```
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00370-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF H.H., H.H., AND 

H.H., CHILDREN

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 89th District 

Court

of Wichita County (190,898-C)

December 8, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice 

Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Tom Hofer, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of Vendalux Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2001, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Vendalux
Corporation

By:       /s/
   --------------------
   Name: Tom Hofer
   Title:   Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer
583 A.2d 346

#### JOHN V. SPARKMAN v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY.

March 26, 1990.

Petition for certification denied. (See 237 *N.J.Super.*623, 568 A.2d 917)
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Senate]
[Page S7405]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                       RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME

  The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under the previous order, leadership time 
is reserved.

                          ____________________
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6974

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICHARD DWAYNE ALLISON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Glen M. Williams, Senior 

District Judge. (1:04-cr-00093-gmw-pms-1)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 10, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Dwayne Allison, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. 

Bockhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Dwayne Allison appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006), which sought a reduction in sentence based 

upon the amendments to the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Allison, No. 1:04-cr-00093-gmw-pms-1 

(W.D. Va. Apr. 7, 2009). We deny the Government’s motion to 

dismiss the appeal and dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

                  ACTIVE SUBSIDIARIES OF IONA TECHNOLOGIES PLC

<Table>
<Caption>
              SUBSIDIARY                      COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
-----------------------------------------     ------------------------
<S>                                           <C>
IONA Technologies, Inc.                       US
IONA Technologies Pty. Limited                Australia
IONA Technologies Finance                     Cayman Islands
IONA Technologies China Limited               China
IONA Technologies GmbH                        Germany
IONA Technologies UK Limited                  UK
IONA Technologies Sarl                        France
IONA Technologies Singapore                   Singapore
IONA Technologies Japan                       Japan
IONA Technologies Italia Srl                  Italy
IONA Technologies (Suisse) SA                 Switzerland
IONA Technologies (Belgium) SA                Belgium
IONA Technologies Netherlands BV              The Netherlands
IONA Technologies Spain, S.L                  Spain
IONA Technologies Korea Limited               Korea
IONA Research (Ireland) Limited               Ireland
Genesis Development Corporation               US
Object-Oriented Concepts, Inc.                US
Object-Oriented Concepts, Inc.                Canada
Object-Oriented Concepts Gmbh                 Germany
Netfish Technologies, Inc.                    US
IONA Government Technologies, Inc.            US
Orbix Limited                                 Ireland
</Table>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

 Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 10 a.m.-12 Noon.

# PLACE:

Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# STATUS:

Commission Meeting—Open to the Public.

## Matters To Be Considered

                    1.                     *Decisional Matter:*                     Final Interpretative Rule: Interpretation of Children's Product.                

                    2.                     *Briefing Matter:*                     Strategic Plan.                

                    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at                     *http://www.cpsc.gov/​webcast.*                     For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.                

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: September 14, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-23520 Filed 9-16-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
News United States Air Force
 Academy grad makes Denver Broncos' rosterPublished Sept. 5, 2014
                        
                        By John Van Winkle
                        
                        
                        U.S. Air Force Academy Public Affairs
                **U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY, Colo. (AFNS) --**
                Four years of fighting in the NFL trenches earned a U.S. Air Force Academy graduate a spot on the Denver Broncos' roster, Aug. 30.
Class of 2010 grad and former Air Force Falcon football athlete Ben Garland is now a second-string offensive guard, backing up Pro-Bowler Louis Vasquez at left guard and Orlando Franklin at right guard.
"It was a dream come true," Garland said. "I'm still waiting to wake up. I can't stop still smiling and it's one of the happiest moments of my life."
NFL teams cut their training camp rosters from 75 to the regular-season limit of 53 after their final preseason game. The final preseason game for the Broncos was Aug. 28 against the Dallas Cowboys.
"For those couple of days after the last game against the Dallas Cowboys, you're just hoping not to hear bad news and just waiting it out," Garland said. 
Garland was one of many players on the bubble dreading the upcoming cuts but now that he's survived the cutoff, he said his job now is to, "prepare every single day to get better."
The former Falcon has "determination like no other," said Broncos general manager and former quarterback John Elway. 
"He's very bright; he's tough and just worked his tail off to earn a spot on the team," Elway said. "So he's just going to continue to get better and better too because he hasn't been over there. He's very inexperienced in the offensive line but he's got the qualities that we believe that (he) can be a very good offensive lineman and also be a guy that eventually can probably swing center (and) guard so (we have a ) lot of flexibility with Ben."
Coaches have asked him to switch positions to have a better chance of making the team. Garland moved from defensive tackle to offensive guard in 2012. 
Garland was signed to the Broncos' practice squad in 2012 and transferred from active duty to the Colorado Air National Guard's 140th Fighter Wing at Buckley Air Force Base, Colorado as a public affairs officer. 
He joined the Broncos as an undrafted free agent defensive lineman in 2010, spending his leave and days off in training camp with the team. 
Garland's military commitment put him on the Broncos' reserve-military list for 2010 and 2011, allowing the team to retain his rights but not have him count against their active or practice squad rosters. Defense Department policy required Garland to serve at least 24 months of active duty before applying for transfer to the Guard or Reserve if signed by an NFL team.Ben Garland 



Academy 



Air Force Academy 



Falcons 



Bronocs 



Denver 



football 



Colorado Air National Guard 



140th Fighter Wing 



Buckley Air Force Base 



NFL