alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 Survival instructor keeps F-35 training afloatPublished Nov. 17, 2014
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Marleah Robertson
                        
                        
                        33rd Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFNS) --**
                Within the 33rd Fighter Wing, innovation doesn't end at the flightline, but finds its way into a 12-foot swimming pool where new F-35 Lighting II pilots are now able to seamlessly complete their water survival training.
During the F-35 aircrew flight equipment shop water survival training here, pilots are required to swim under the parachute and follow the seams to find their way out -- this worked with the C-9 parachute since it would stay afloat. With the new IRVIN-GQ 6000 parachute, a different design and thicker material at the center of the canopy caused the parachute to quickly sink to the bottom of a 12-foot pool, creating a difficult scenario for students.
"Previously, we would spread the lines of the parachute to the sides of the pool," said Staff Sgt. Edwin Portan, an F-35 AFE continuation training instructor with the 33rd Operations Support Squadron. "The canopy would then sink all the way down to the bottom of the pool, making it impossible for the second student to complete their evaluation because they would be pulling about 100 pounds of parachute canopy from underneath the water."
This proved to be detrimental to the program since students were unable to successfully complete that portion of the training.
"This was not a good simulation of the situation that would be experienced after a fully inflated parachute landed on top of the pilot," said Col. Christopher Niemi, the 33rd Operations Group commander. "The pilot would typically end up doing a 180 degree turn and then exit from under the parachute exactly where they entered."
Recognizing the issue, Portan, with some ingenuity and innovation, took a trip to a hardware store and came back with a solution.
"The concept started with thinking of something that floats," Portan said. "We got some PVC pipe, created the design, tested it and it worked out very well."
Portan's new device has since been implemented into the training and pilots are now able to complete their required tasks.
"With the parachute being spread out with this octagon-shaped PVC pipe floatation device, it sinks to a more realistic depth," said Portan. "It's just enough to get that heavy parachute canopy on them for the training, but not enough to where it becomes a safety hazard, and ultimately makes the training more effective."IRVIN-GQ 6000 parachute 



training 



AFE 



Aircrew flight equipment 



water survival 



33rd Fighter Wing 



Eglin Air Force Base 



F-35 Lighting II
Air Force partners with universities in next-generation minority leaders research collaboration program By Donna Lindner,   Air Force Research Laboratory / Published December 03, 2020  WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio (AFNS) -- **Air Force Research Laboratory**
 PHOTO DETAILS  DOWNLOAD HI-RES
 Cristian Orozco, a University of Texas El Paso graduate student, works in the Materials and Manufacturing Directorate over the summer. One of his duties includes working with a vacuum chamber for thin film coatings for optics. (U.S. Air Force photo by Donna Lindner)
 
 TagAFWN TagUSAF TagAF TagAir Force TagAFMC TagAir Force Materiel Command Tagdiversity Taguniversity Tagpartnership Tageducation Tagstudent Tagstem Tagscience Tagtechnology Tagengineering Tagmath TagAFRL. Air Force Research Laboratory TagCollaboration II TagMinority Leaders RCP TagOhio State University TagWright State University TagNorth Carolina A&T State University
f^H^iiw^BP lirtji**J-f*PJ>*Safi*«iBf^*;"«f««C «ri;fes^^s*^*#j^j)iijiiai'.

W^'-'i •-'.• '-.". t- .- ,- .,, ... ..-..,,;,. ^ w .. . -- ,-v,~, ■♦fW^jSai*^*'" *»'•» -'• 1f,-^l -'^

:^;>^^«4-«i><m**^^-V~-..**,*«.*««-,.*ft-,^...,,-.-.;. ,-«,?>'>

*.;w*(*W^W^rtsWStA^if * ••♦ jfpWt,

•- •irt* *tvt-*** •*.••**t*'-o'

"sTM"-**;/-

_iL_TM

•w*i,»'*'v»»**«i,*;r ^rwt****W'»iv*«*wW'

|v^ |"5~-SM^cV

14th COURT OP APPEALS,,, ...v**^

•Wbp.?& -*** ^^r^^-v^f!;^-'^'***^*

;*#**ji*!*"'•*«»"*'' >* i,-to«>t^;4Sri*i-'Wli'

- .*v-'*.-rji-j'ctWrtV' *S*u.»i« ••• *«; -m.*^;). wlfWt

•V*-^^**w..w*S'•***•--* ;v^**«^»«•;!•*!£«£(.•

'•- .-i->!H««ww.arF«i>U^,-,

vC^V^^iia^iMi&ii^ ';"

*JMISf*«"«^:*'*iMir4^J^1(ji^^'
,.^»-^i>:*;^>^?^^^ ;,f, -,v • .i •^v*,WW"*«'*** .*'J *„.»w"tt>J£rT«M*M4v^»>^i*,f4

,^/ fc/ aw..J*#i4-$&.$../^&&^^

*-»^Jj5i^*.-.' - .v ,-wtr^Hi.'^V^-," *.-*,**

.V„«;W(, «liI**,-.tfw.,j,.tfJUS&k

ijYjJ^J,1^*1wVifMl"^^*^i,li t..^,;-.'.^,..^'*-,*.'-*^ **••••!fl'pn;t«)p,'>^-*!sil*l"

it>*ij#im.-&x&*t -,£<wy'it&* i*>-»;* fnn&s-jt- j*-v '-"--Ji«««-( ^-*".*~-7^»^.-^:i«»H

iypilttj£t£*0»--#i(iHM«/(&»*i- ,/i??2#,. ^

-Tfc'ii*'***.*?V.*j*i4W-«r3!TMi<,

f«sV«i^ji*"«»i^'^'^^^w^^ff^.V,'::'' -*.**-^.'-p-y -v="s

,,2',. „x£.~~4k^>*2£8~J

;• • 1 -<•'«.-', \.- ,'>.>&>'.v,

>*Ljt%Z*^%&t2%&6.

-.-iC'S"^- <:.-.-'.•-,-. T'-;; •»^^j^^>,v^.*-'*-^:-*?i^?^^"'^'''^4.'Vi^f>

l5".?S*«..~',H't>k-aj.i./ wj^,i$r£ki,'i«'t*a»***-"*"'4

?,^.-r1v^

4S/•j*j!>.*^"if*t-'»'*"-»s!-j. v'-S*'»•;. -fc-'r-.

^Jfc^.^jCjfa^r.^U.

•M-^t^^lnjf^tf,! -*\ 4-Ji *Jir*v^.l

'V-4*/t^0>*rM-*4>'l'"* ^.j^rf-'.- -*i-»'»f«.^i-**a(>^is*?*i\«

i^flf^&ft'^V%)f*J^^*w-**^^^

SiW^^-fliJ^i^.W***^^^ ^l).^-«?#-J---rCv.•'^ifcl't-.fc f*ty'J*Wi:^7. trr •:*"" £*?* tfj*'.'i'-1* '" A1"-'

vw*m^&^iji^<^i-*fr4Wi'^&i^^^ Of.fr.*-*'*^4fo&#*i&^J*tiS^#W
7> JL, &6U&., s?t6 /ie^Z^As^t '

/&< d, ^AoMe. # ^ jaa.

//' 7<V# /^n^t^^L jZ^2&k&£<z, 04j£

&n. £1 CtfTL&ttel&iroC <

C^tl6L

J

Jk-Jdu.

\L

w^^tf^; /lLmz* &ku*iftf; tJefa^

<ZL>

Jf\ J/s. -A/*h*vl4& &nA&hd% A^a/ ^tZtoagg&L. <'

..&**&*>../&**£._.Zferfd**^p*xs^-ZE. /fSJ&Al

*4y^ toC^ <At+.aZ6y&#y, j&< .^^^^y'<y\//•ji^
A .Us. ft. OtM > St. "

3. /ftJadft /%&LidtM2&

•^yy^//^f/ ^ ^ ^>-- &J!&>

/52- /i/)y $ /3y, />^3 yyJyfZ~

-frf/L -^4006*4 sdd&fciH&tiA /ZJS y^C ^^fV"/^^^/^

x^^^^^^^x^^^r

...JL'lUtJ'lWWWB ••a-JHB^-JJPHi-'""

-£.
News United States Air Force
 Luke F-35 team competes for first time in load crew competitionPublished Dec. 21, 2015
                        
                        
                        56th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. (AFNS) --**
                A Luke Air Force Base F-35A Lightning II crew competed for the first time in a load crew competition Dec. 18, against legacy F-16 Fighting Falcon crews.
Quarterly load crew competitions showcase the combat readiness and effectiveness of load crew teams to safely and properly arm an aircraft within time constraints to meet mission challenges.
Three-man crews from the 61st Aircraft Maintenance Unit, 309th AMU, 310th AMU and the 425th AMU went head to head to earn the fourth quarter win.
The competition provided an opportunity for the crews to demonstrate their ammo-loading skills on both the F-35 and F-16.
"The weapons load competition is a healthy rivalry amongst the aircraft maintenance units to seek out the best of the best within the AMUs," said Master Sgt. James Byers, the 61st AMU F-35 weapons section chief.
For the 61st AMU team, loading the F-35 is a skill they have been developing since the arrival of the jet, but their skills had not yet been tested against F-16 crews, many of whom have been working on their airframes for years.
"Today, the F-35 load team raised the ante by showing off their skills," Byers said. "It shows how we, as an Air Force, can evolve from the legacy F-16 program to the advanced F-35 program without missing a beat."
The competition proved that both airframes at Luke AFB, the F-35 and F-16, have capable crewmembers.
"Every day I watch the F-35 program moving further and further ahead," Byers said. "Being featured in this competition is one more step forward to show the community the F-35 is a technological marvel."
Involvement in this contest was significant for the F-35 program at Luke AFB.
"It was great to see the F-35 included in a Luke AFB weapons load competition for the first time," said Lt. Col. Mike Gette, the 61st Fighter Squadron commander. "The 61st AMU has put in a lot of hard work and overcome many obstacles to get to this point, and it was awesome to see them in action."
The winning teams from each of the previous quarters will compete Jan. 22.
The winning crew will represent Luke AFB and take on the load crew team from the 49th Maintenance Group at Holloman AFB, New Mexico. Only one team can take the title and be crowned champions as weapons load crew of the year.
The final competition will be Jan. 29, against Holloman. The hard work of the F-35 weapons load crews will be seen during their first weapons drop scheduled to occur early 2016.
"We hope to be dropping weapons here at the Barry M. Goldwater Range a few months from now," Gette said. "Having the F-35 in this competition means we are getting close to achieving that goal. It is also a critical milestone as we help push the F-35 toward Air Force initial operational capability and train pilots for the first operational squadron."F-35A Lightning II 



F-35 



load crew 



competition 



Luke AFB 



ACC
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Wei Shi, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Toyota Auto Receivables 2011-B Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.













March 27, 2012
By:  /S/ WEI SHIWei ShiPresidentToyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as Depositor(Senior officer in charge of securitization of thedepositor)









- 10 -
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the quarterly report of Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Harry  M.  Neer,  Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Harry M. Neer
----------------------------------
Harry M. Neer,
Chief Executive Officer and President
June 30, 2004


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. and will be retained by
Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
#### CHARLES T. JACK v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEMS.

February 6, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
759 A.2d 371

#### Beth A. HUMPHREYS, Respondent, v. William DeROSS, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 14, 2000.

Stephen E. Hall, Meadville, Joanne Ross Wilder, Pittsburgh, for petitioner.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 2000, we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and we direct the parties to address the following issues:

> 1. Is an inheritance included in the definition of “income” as set forth in Section 4302 of the Divorce Code, 23 Pa.C.S.A. 4302?

> 2. If an inheritance meets the statutory definition of “income,” should the entire inheritance be considered as income when calculating a support order or only the interest generated or imputed to be generated by the entire inheritance?

> 3. If an inheritance is not included when calculating a support order under the Support Guidelines, should it be considered a factor in deviating from the support amount determined by the Guidelines?

> 4. If an inheritance is considered when calculating support, should it be allocated over the period of the child’s *217minority or limited to the year following receipt of the inheritance?

> 5. Should the amount of an inheritance affect the way in which it is considered for calculating a support order?

> 6. Should a payor who receives an inheritance be required to place in escrow an amount sufficient to secure the support obligation?
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00318

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF N.J., A C HILD §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323

- 106292

- 17)

February 1 4 , 2019

Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment . It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
News United States Air Force
 C-130J crashes in AfghanistanPublished Oct. 2, 2015
                        
                        
                        455th Air Expeditionary Wing
                **BAGRAM AIRFIELD, Afghanistan --**
                An Air Force C-130J Super Hercules assigned to the 774th Expeditionary Airlift Squadron, part of the 455th Air Expeditionary Wing, crashed Oct. 2 at approximately 12:19 a.m. at Jalalabad Airfield, Afghanistan.
The crew, six U.S. service members and five civilian passengers, died in the crash.
First responders responded to the crash.
The cause of the crash is currently under investigation. More information will be released as it becomes available.AFCENT 



C-130 



Afghanistan 



455th AEW 



C-130J Super Hercules 



Bagram Airfield Related Links
        Airmen killed in C-130 crash from Dyess, Hanscom
**Exhibit 12.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Geoffrey B. Genovese, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of EnvoyCommunications Group Inc., certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Envoy Communications Group Inc.;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.  The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the company and have:
          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5.  The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thecompany’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Date: February 17, 2005
By:/s/ Geoffrey B. Genovese
         Geoffrey B. Genovese
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23659]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 15, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. BancFirst Corporation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Exchange Bancshares of Moore, Inc., and 
thereby acquire shares of Exchange National Bank, both in Moore, 
Oklahoma.
    2. Everest Bancshares, Everest, Kansas; to acquire 100 percent of 
the voting shares of Bancshares of McLouth, Inc., and therby acquire 
shares of Bank of McLouth, both in McLouth, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 17, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-23659 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### JOHN RUMBAUSKAS v. EXXON CHEMICAL COMPANY, U.S.A.

January 17, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D24-0066

LT Case No. 2018-CF-12249-A

_____________________________

GAMBA KENTE RAY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County.

Laura E. Ward, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Gamba Kente Ray, Arcadia, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellee.

March 12, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, JAY, and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EDAC
Technologies Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended July 2, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:            August 2, 2005           /s/ Dominick A. Pagano
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Dominick A. Pagano
                                           Chief Executive Officer

Dated:            August 2, 2005           /s/ Glenn L. Purple
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Glenn L. Purple
                                           Chief Financial Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to EDAC Technologies Corporation and will be retained by EDAC
Technologies Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request