alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
News United States Air Force
 1,000th F-35 training sortie flown at Luke AFBPublished April 1, 2015
                        
                        By 56th Fighter Wing Public Affairs
                **LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. (AFNS) --**
                The 56th Fighter Wing flew its 1,000th F-35A Lightning II training sortie March 31, making it the fastest F-35 wing to reach the 1,000-sortie milestone in the Defense Department.
This is the second historic milestone in the past two weeks. Last week, Luke’s first F-35 student sortie was flown marking a significant step forward for the Airmen at Luke in realizing its new mission -- training the world's greatest F-35 and F-16 Fighting Falcon fighter pilots. That student was the commander of the 56th Fighter Wing, Brig. Gen. Scott Pleus, who is making the transition from the F-16 to the F-35. 
The first official class of student pilots is scheduled to begin in May, at the Academic Training Center, a 145,000-square-foot, two-story training center. 
"I’m extremely proud of the extraordinary work our maintainers are doing to ensure our pilots have mission-ready and safe jets," Pleus said. “The F-35 is going to be the backbone of the Air Force's fighter fleet for decades to come and Luke will play a vital role in producing the world's greatest, most lethal F-35 pilots. With initial operational capability scheduled to occur late next year, it's important that we get our training program and process dialed in and as efficient and refined as our F-16 training program is, so we can help meet the Air Force's scheduled goal."
Pleus also reflected on the years of work that have gone into the F-35 program putting Luke in position to begin training in May.
“Getting to this point hasn’t just been accomplished over the past few months.  It’s really been done over the last few years,” he said. “Lots of amazing Airmen who served before us here at Luke are the reason we are where we are with the F-35 program. What they did back then to set the base up is the reason why we will be so successful training the world’s greatest F-35 pilots.”
There are 20 F-35s assigned to Luke, two of which belong to the Royal Australian air force, an F-35 pilot training, partner nation.Luke AFB 



sortie 



training 



56th Fighter Wing 



F-35A Lightning II
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 176 (Monday, September 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 55626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22758]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7161]

Determination and Certification Under Section 7046(b) of the 
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs 
Appropriations Act, 2010

    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of State under 
section 7046(b) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and 
Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. L. 111-117), 
which incorporates by reference and amends, in part, section 7046(d) of 
the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs 
Appropriations Act, 2009 (Div. H, Pub. L. 111-8) (FY 2009 SFOAA), I 
hereby determine and certify that the Government of Colombia is meeting 
the conditions described in section 7046(d)(2) of the FY 2009 SFOAA, 
and that I have consulted with Congress as consistent with section 
7046(d)(1) of the FY 2009 SFOAA, as amended.

    Dated: August 31, 2010.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-22758 Filed 9-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
```
#### Geo. W. Whitley v. Andrew Jackson.

(No. 1359, Op. Book No. 3, p. 406.)

Appeal from Anderson County.

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 574. *Attachment bond; condition as to costs.*The attachment bond in this case was quashed in the court below. It was conditioned that the “plaintiff will prosecute his suit with effect, and that he will pay such damages as shall be adj udged against him for wrongfully suing out said attachment.” *Held,*the bond is not conditioned as the law requires. The word “costs;” used in the statute, is omitted. [R. S. 156-158.] This is a substantial and fatal omission, and the bond was properly quashed.

§ 575. *New attachment bond cannot be allowed.*The plaintiff undertook to obviate the defect in his attachment bond by filing, befoi-e the motion to quash was acted upon, a bond for costs. This was not permissible. Attachment laws and the proceedings under them are to be strictly and rigidly construed as against the plaintiff in attachment, and it has been the uniform practice in this state to exact of a plaintiff in attachment a strict and literal compliance with the requirements of the statute. [Sloo v. Powell, Dallam, 469; Sydnor v. Chambers, id. 604; Wooster v. McGee, 1 Tex. 17; Caldwell v. Haley, 3 Tex. 317; Givens v. Taylor, 6 Tex. 320; Chevallier v. Williams, 2 Tex. 243.]

§ 576. *Pleadings in justice's court are oral,*except, *etc.; same rule governs on appeal, etc.; p)lea of payment, etc.*In cases originating in justices’ courts the pleadings of the parties, except certain defenses which are specified, are not required to be in writing. The plea of payment or settlement is not required to be made in writing, but may be oral. [R. S. 1573, 3574.] The same rule governs when the case is taken to the county court. [Henry v. Blasco, *ante,*p. 420.] This was a suit in jus*299tice’s court upon an account. Defendant pleaded a counterclaim. Plaintiff, to rebut the counterclaim, filed another account as a payment or settlement of defendant’s account. The county court rejected evidence offered by plaintiff to prove payment or settlement of defendant’s counterclaim, upon the ground that plaintiff had not pleaded the same in writing. *Held*error.

October 21, 1882.

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 77 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4677]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                              {time}  1130
                         THE REPUBLICAN BUDGET

  (Mr. DeFAZIO asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute.)
  Mr. DeFAZIO. Mr. Speaker, the gentleman referenced the balanced 
budget. He cannot get to a balanced budget while increasing military 
spending, cutting taxes for the wealthy and the largest corporations, 
and here is the proof, the Republican budget.
  It is impossible to do that unless, unless you want to gut virtually 
every other program of the Federal Government from child nutrition to 
student loans, to Federal law enforcement, to veterans benefits, 
Medicare, and, yes, Social Security.
  They will all take a massive cut so the Pentagon can continue its 
wanton spending and the wealthy can put another BMW in the garage. I 
expected that kind of a budget, but never, never did I expect that the 
Republicans would go back on their pledge to not touch Social Security.
  Buried deep in this budget is a little change in the COLA factor, 
just a little change. It will cut future retirement benefits for 
veterans, future retirement benefits for military retirees, future 
benefits for every Civil Service retiree. And yes, Social Security 
benefits, too, starting in 1999 will be reduced by their budget.

                          ____________________
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Viewpoint Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we,
Jay S. Amato and William H. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to our knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                         |  |     |  |                                                   
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 14, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ JAY S. AMATO                                  
|                         |  |     |  |                                                   
|                         |  |     |  | Jay S. Amato
President and Chief Executive Officer
|                         |  |     |  |                                                   
|Dated: November 14, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ WILLIAM H. MITCHELL                           
|                         |  |     |  |                                                   
|                         |  |     |  | William H. Mitchell
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                METATOOLS, INC.                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                      STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF
                          NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Three Months Ended             Six Months Ended
                                                      June 30,                     June 30,
                                              -----------------------      -------------------------
                                                1996           1995          1996             1995
                                              -----------------------      -------------------------
<S>                                           <C>           <C>            <C>             <C>
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED (1)

Weighted average shares outstanding for
 the period..................................  11,783,000   3,166,000       11,667,000     3,147,000
Common equivalent shares, including
 items pursuant to Staff Accounting
 Bulletin No. 83.............................   1,331,000   2,477,000        1,373,000     2,477,000
                                              -----------------------      -------------------------
Shares used in per share calculation.........  13,114,000   5,643,000       13,040,000     5,624,000
                                              =======================      =========================

Net income before dividends and
 amortization................................ $ 1,002,000  $ (436,000)     $ 1,726,000   $  (866,000)
Preferred stock dividend requirements
 and amortization of issuance costs..........          -      (72,000)              -       (144,000)
                                              -----------------------      -------------------------
Net income (loss) available for common
 stockholders................................ $ 1,002,000  $ (508,000)     $ 1,726,000   $(1,010,000)
                                              =======================      =========================
Net income (loss) per common share........... $       .08  $     (.09)     $       .13   $      (.18)
                                              =======================      =========================
</TABLE>

(1) Primary and fully diluted calculations are substantially the same.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1236 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1236

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 1, 2007

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
 United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for 
                        breast cancer research.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.

    Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2007'' and inserting ``2011''.

SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

    The National Institutes of Health and the Department of Defense 
shall each submit to Congress and the Government Accountability Office 
an annual report concerning the use of any amounts that it received 
under section 414(c) of title 39, United States Code, including a 
description of any significant advances or accomplishments, during the 
year covered by the report, that were funded, in whole or in part, with 
such amounts.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 30, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<Page>



                                                    [LOGO]

                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to the
registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 333-43799) (the "Registration
Statement") of our report dated February 13, 2003, relating to the financial
statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement.



PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 4, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel; Conference Grants.                    

*Date:*                         November 5, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health/Office of Review, Democracy 1, 6701 Democracy Blvd., 1078, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lee Warren Slice, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0965.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 93.306, 93.333; 93.702, ARRA Related Construction Awards., National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 16, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-23852 Filed 9-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 25, 2018

No. 04-17-00594-CV

Josh Michael CRUZ,

Appellant

v.

Alicia CRUZ,

Appellee

From the 2nd 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-0953-CV

Jessica Crawford, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellees’ motion for extension of time to file their brief is GRANTED. We order the 

brief due on February 20, 2018. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of January, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
583 A.2d 340

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT CALDES.

March 20, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
News United States Air Force
 Tech Report: The B-52 StratofortressPublished May 3, 2016
                        
                        By Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- For the last 60 years, the B-52 Stratofortress has had an incredible career as the U.S. military’s main bomber. Even though it's 60 years old, it still has plenty of years of service left.
The B-52 is a long-range, heavy bomber that can perform a variety of missions. The bomber is capable of flying at high subsonic speeds at altitudes up to 50,000 feet. It can carry nuclear or precision guided conventional ordnance with worldwide precision navigation capability.
The Air Force Tech Report is a video series that gives viewers a quick look at current technology the Air Force uses to fly, fight and win.bomber 



Tech Report 



B-52 Stratofortress 



B-52
#### Michael J. ALLEN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D10-154.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 30, 2011.

Michael J. Allen, Jr., Raiford, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Michael J. Allen, Jr., appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence. In his motion, Allen alleged that, following his plea, he was awarded credit for 297 days time served in the Palm Beach County jail at the Gun Club and Stockade facilities and that it was apparent from the face of his “court and jail records” that he was entitled to credit for an additional 165 days of credit for time served between May 1, 2008 and August 6, 2009. The trial court summarily denied the motion, referencing a handwritten notation on the plea sheet to the effect that “defendant agrees credit is correct.” We reverse.

Allen’s motion was facially sufficient. *See Phillips v. State,*839 So.2d 893, 894 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); *see also Warren v. State,*980 So.2d 1204, 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). “An order denying a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion should include not only ‘valid reasons for the denial by the trial court, but also attachments of portions of the record sufficient to support the denial.’ ” *Macool v. State,*7 So.3d 637, 637 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (quoting *Brown v. State,*816 So.2d 1142, 1143 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)); *see also Linder v. State,*54 So.3d 1031 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). The trial court failed to attach the referenced plea sheet to the order of denial. And, even if the plea sheet had been attached, it would have been insufficient to establish Allen knowingly and intelligently waived his entitlement to the additional credit. *See Howard v. State, 40*So.3d 46, 47 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“A stipulation as to a specific amount of credit is not sufficient to demonstrate that a defendant knowingly and intelligently waived credit to which he otherwise would be entitled ‘in the absence of evidence that the defendant knew of his entitlement to additional credit and voluntarily relinquished that right.’”) (quoting *Velasquez v. State,*11 So.3d 979, 980 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)); *see also Giggetts v. State,*5 So.3d 756, 757 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

*Reversed, and Remanded.*

GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
MAJOR GENERAL ROBERT F. TATERobert Frederick Tate was born at St. Louis, Mo., in 1905. He graduated from the U.S. Military Academy and was commissioned a second lieutenant of cavalry on June 9, 1928. 

The following September General Tate began primary and basic flying training at Brooks Field, Texas. He was transferred to Kelly Field, Texas where he graduated from Advanced Flying School in November 1929 and was transferred to the Air Corps. 

General Tate's first assignment was as engineering officer of the Third Attack Group at Fort Crockett, Texas. He entered the Air Corps Technical School in June 1930, graduated a year later and returned to his assignment with the Third Attack Group. 

In May 1937 the General went to France Field, Panama Canal Zone to become recruiting and press relations officer and adjutant. Appointed commanding officer of the 73rd Bomb Squadron at March Field, Calif., in July 1939, the following year he graduated from the Air Corps Tactical School and assumed command of the 32nd Bomb Squadron at March Field, Calif. In January 1942 he became a pilot on a special project at Tampa, Fla. 

Returning overseas in April 1942, General Tate became commander of the Trans-India Ferry Command. Three months later he was appointed executive officer of the China-Burma-India Ferry Command, assuming command in August 1942. Designated theater air officer for the forward echelon of the Army Air Force in the China-Burma-India Theater in January 1943, General Tate served until April 1944 when he returned to the United States. 

Named assistant for personnel and organization of the Organization and Requirements Division at Air Force Headquarters in June 1944, that December the general became a member of the Operations Division of the War Department General Staff. Entering the National War College, Washington, D.C. in August 1946, upon graduation in June 1947 he remained as a member of the faculty. 

Appointed chief of the U.S. Air Force Group of the American Mission for Aid to Turkey in August 1949, General Tate joined the U.S. Air Forces in Europe, Wiesbaden, Germany in January 1951 as deputy for operations. In September 1953 he returned to Washington, D.C. to become the Air Force member of the Joint Strategic Survey Committee, Joint Chiefs of Staff. 

Going to the Air University on Sept. 3, 1956 General Tate was designated commandant, Air War College, Air University, Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala. 

His decorations include the Legion of Merit, Distinguished Service Medal, Distinguished Flying Cross and the Air Medal. His foreign decorations include the Chilean Order of Merit and the Chinese Order of Yun Hui. He is rated a command pilot and aircraft observer. 

(Up to date as of October 1956)