alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-12-0000713 02-OCT-2012 08:15 AM
NO. SCAD-12-0000713
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs. ROBERT D. KAWAMURA, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 07-034-8494)
ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.) Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai ' i, the stipulated facts, and the evidence in the record, it appears Respondent Robert D. Kawamura neglected a client matter for nineteen months, to the potential injury of the client’s claim, in violation of Rules 1.3 and 8.4(a) of the Hawai ' i Rules of Professional Conduct. It further appears that Respondent Kawamura cooperated fully with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) in its investigation and disciplinary proceedings, but that the investigation and disciplinary proceedings were delayed for a period in excess of four years through no fault of RespondentKawamura’s. It further appears Respondent Kawamura has a heretofore unblemished disciplinary record and has expressed remorse for his actions. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Robert D. Kawamura is publicly censured, pursuant to Rule 2.3(a)(3) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai ' i. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent Kawamura shall pay all costs of the proceedings, as approved upon a timely submission of a bill of costs, as prescribed by RSCH Rule 2.3(c). DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, October 2, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack

2
News United States Air Force
 Operation Homefront recognizes AF Military Child of the YearPublished April 15, 2016
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs Command Information
                **WASHINGTON (AFNS) --**
                Air Force Vice Chief of Staff Gen. David L. Goldfein presented the Operation Homefront 2016 Air Force Military Child of the Year award to Madeleine Morlino, 17, during a ceremony April 14, in Pentagon City, Virginia.Madeleine, of Moorestown, New Jersey, is the daughter of retired Master Sgt. Leonard and Kerry Morlino. She was selected as the Air Force military child recipient along with five other children from each of the services including the National Guard. The award honors resiliency, strength of character in the face of the challenges associated with military life, and selfless service to others within their families and communities.Operation Homefront received more than 500 nominations for this year’s competition. “As we celebrate our honorees tonight, we do so knowing that there are many, many more military kids making good things happen in their homes and in their communities,” said retired Brig. Gen. John I. Pray Jr., the president and CEO of Operation Homefront. “Tonight’s honorees follow 28 other military child of the year award winners since 2009, each one a shining example of promise and hope.”Madeleine said she was motivated by the challenges her family faced as her father transitioned from military to civilian life and wanted to ease the transition for other service members. She conceived, organized and led a job expo for veterans in her hometown and successfully attracted national and local businesses poised to offer veterans meaningful employment.Before presenting Madeline with her trophy, Goldfein shared why she was receiving this award.Madeleine maintains a 4.23 GPA while participating in cheer, cross-country and track. Her love of music has earned her the title of concertmaster for both the New Jersey Youth Symphony and the Settlement Orchestra, for which she plays the violin, he said. In Madeleine’s spare time, she works three jobs -- as an intern at a nonprofit organization, a server in a bistro, and an instructor at a learning institute. Goldfein, a U.S. Air Force Academy graduate, said nothing could please him more than to recognize Madeline’s choice of college. “She currently has a full-ride ROTC scholarship to Princeton, and William and Mary ... full rides from the Army, the Air Force and the Navy ROTC and she currently has an appointment to ... four service academies,” Goldfein said. “But, she has made her decision ... I’m going to shed a tear here ... she’s going to the United States Air Force Academy.”Operation Homefront hosts the gala each April to honor the award recipients as part of Month of the Military Child. “I’m truly honored and humbled to receive the award,” Morlino said. “A big ‘thank you’ goes out to my parents over there as well as to the military for welcoming me into their family and your family.”VCSAF 



Month of the Military Child 



AF family
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Tamer Husseini, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Celeritek, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Celeritek, Inc.

         By: /s/ TAMER HUSSEINI
             --------------------------------
         Name:   Tamer Husseini
         Title: Chief Executive Officer

      I, Margaret E. Smith, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Celeritek, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Celeritek, Inc.

         By: /s/ MARGARET E. SMITH
            --------------------------------
         Name:   Margaret E. Smith
         Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### E. J. Neinast v. Ernest Doeckle.

(No. 2144, R. Book No. 4, p. 184.)

Appeal from Washington County.

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 219. *Bents and distress for rents.*At common law, where land was rented for a money rent, and there was no stipulation in the contract as to the time of payment, it will not become due until the end of a year. , [1 Wash, on Eeal Prop. (3d ed.) p. 158.] Exception to this rule is made by our statute in those cases where the tenant, before the expiration of the lease, seeks to remove or does remove the agricultural products and other property subject to the landlord’s lien, off the rented premises, without the latter’s consent. [Eev. Stats, art. 3108.] In such *88cases, though the rent is not due, the landlord is authorized to distrain for his rents. [Rev. Stats, art. 3122.]

November 8, 1882.

§ 220. *Distress warrant.*A distress warrant is not sued out without probable cause where a tenant is removing his cotton off the rented premises, has sold some, and is about selling more when the warrant is sued out.

Reversed and remanded.
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: March 23Published March 24, 2016
                        
                        By Air Force TV
                
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS)** -- This look around the Air Force features the first female combatant commander and the Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James and Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Welsh III testified on Capitol Hill. Hosted by Staff Sgt Traci Keller. 
For previous episodes, click here for the Air Force TV page.
Related links:
- Robinson tapped to be first female combatant commander
- Air Force leaders present FY 2017 budget requestATAF 



testify 



Congress 



SecAF 



CSAF 



budget
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JUN 9 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT EARNEST WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. No. 96-6274 JACK COWLEY, ROBERT BERNARD, DR. SKYAMKANT S. KALKARNI, M.D., and GEORGE ROACH, Defendants-Appellees. (D.C. No. CIV-96-288-T) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges. **
Robert Earnest Wilson, an inmate at the Oklahoma State Reformatory, filed this § 1983 action pro se against prison officials alleging that the officials failed to provide him adequate medical treatment following an injury to his ankle in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Defendants submitted a Martinez report, see Martinez v. Aaron , 570 F.2d2

317 (10th Cir. 1978) (en banc), and moved for summary judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. A magistrate judge thoroughly reviewed the facts and recommended the Defendants’ motion be granted. The district court adopted the recommendation over Plaintiff’s objection. Plaintiff appeals. Our jurisdicton arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Hayes v. Marriott , 70 F.3d 1144, 1146 (10th Cir. 1995), and affirm. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, pleadings, affidavits, and the entire record before us. We agree with the district court substantially for the reasons set forth in its order adopting the magistrate’s recommendation and granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Vol. I, docs. 10, 14.
AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court,

Bobby R. Baldock Circuit Judge
Amendment to Strategic Alliance Agreement



 Exhibit 10.19 
  
 AMENDMENT TO STRATEGIC ALLIANCE AGREEMENT 
 Between West Marine Products, Inc. and Dickie Walker Marine, Inc. 
 December 6, 2003 
  
 This Amendment to the Strategic Alliance Agreement (“Agreement”)
originally dated December 19, 2001, as amended, between West Marine Products, Inc. (“West Marine”) and Dickie Walker Marine, Inc. (“Dickie Walker”) is made as of December 6, 2003 (the “Effective Date”). 
  
 RECITALS 
  
 A. The parties entered into a Strategic Alliance Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2001 (the “Agreement”).
Capitalized terms used herein that are defined in the Agreement shall have the definitions specified in the Agreement. 
  
 B. The parties wish to extend the term of the Agreement to terminate on December 31, 2004. 
  
 AGREEMENTS 
  
 For and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
  
 1.
Term. Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
  
 Subject to earlier termination as set forth herein, this Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2004. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
the parties will review the performance of the apparel department on an annual basis within the period specified in achievement of the “Measurement Goals” (as defined in Section 13), and other retail factors normally associated with retail
performance, to determine the economic viability of the venture contemplated by this Agreement. 
  
 2. Further Assurances. Each party shall take such actions and execute such documents as may be reasonably requested by the other party to further
the intent of this Amendment. 
  
 3. Counterparts. This
Amendment may be executed in as many counterparts as may be convenient and shall become binding when Dickie Walker and West Marine have executed at least one counterpart. This Amendment may be delivered by facsimile transmission of the relevant
signature pages hereof. 
  
 4. Governing Law. This
Amendment shall be a contract made under and governed by the laws of the State of California, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions thereof. 
  
 5. Binding Effect. This Amendment shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of Dickie Walker and West Marine and their respective
successors and assigns. 
  
 6. No other Amendments. Except
as amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date. 
  

	 WEST MARINE PRODUCTS, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/    KEN
CORWIN        


	Name:	 	Ken Corwin
	Title:	 	SVP GMM
	
	 DICKIE WALKER MARINE, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/    GERALD W.
MONTIEL        


	Name:	 	Gerald W. Montiel
	Title:	 	Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 66 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 66

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
     establish and protect the rights of victims of violent crimes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 2007

    Mr. Chabot introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
     establish and protect the rights of victims of violent crimes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification, 
and which shall take effect 180 days after ratification by the required 
number of States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Without denying or abridging the constitutional rights 
of those accused of committing a violent crime, the rights of victims 
of violent crime are hereby established and shall not be denied by any 
State or the United States and may be restricted only as provided in 
this article.
    ``Section 2. A victim of violent crime shall have the right to 
reasonable and timely notice of any public proceeding involving the 
crime and of any release or escape of the accused; the right not to be 
excluded from such public proceeding; the right reasonably to be heard 
at public release, plea, sentencing, reprieve, and pardon proceedings; 
and the right to adjudicative decisions that duly consider the victim's 
safety, interest in avoiding unreasonable delay, and just and timely 
claims to restitution from the offender. These rights shall not be 
restricted except when, and to the degree dictated by, a substantial 
interest in public safety or the administration of criminal justice 
requires such restrictions, or by other compelling necessity.
    ``Section 3. Nothing in this article shall be construed to provide 
grounds for a new trial or to authorize any claim for damages. Only the 
victim or the victim's lawful representative may assert the rights 
established by this article, and no person accused of the crime may 
obtain any form of relief hereunder.
    ``Section 4. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by 
appropriate legislation. Nothing in this article shall affect the 
President's authority to grant reprieves or pardons.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-11045

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

KEDRIAN DEWAYNE DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-91-1

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Kedrian Dewayne Davis has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Davis has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 29, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-11045 Document: 00512750836 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
No. 13-11045

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-11045 Document: 00512750836 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
News United States Air Force
 Around the Air Force: Restored Funding for Bonuses/PCS, Federal Protections for Military Families, AFWERX Fall FellowshipPublished July 28, 2023
                        
                        By Staff Sgt. Milton Hamilton
                        
                        
                        Air Force TV
                **FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, Md. (AFNS) --**
                In this week’s look around the Air Force, funding for permanent change of station moves and bonus programs is restored, the Department of Justice reinforces new Federal protections for military members and their spouses, and a cutting-edge effort from the Air Force is taking applications for a fellowship program. (Hosted by Staff Sgt. Jazmin Granger)

02:00


**Watch on DVIDS | Watch on YouTube**
For previous episodes, click **here** for the Air Force TV page.Featured Video 



AF 



Air Force 



ATAF 



Around the Air Force 



AFTV Related Links
        Air Force reinstates special bonuses, pays, most PCSs
            
            Justice Department reinforces federal protections for servicemembers and their spouses in letter to state officials
            
            AFWERX accepts applications for fall fellowship
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard A. Franco, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on
Form 10-Q of DARA BioSciences, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of DARA
BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of DARA BioSciences, Inc.



By:

/s/ Richard A.
Franco


Name:

Richard A. FrancoTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:

November 12, 2010


I, Ann A. Rosar, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-Q of DARA BioSciences, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of DARA BioSciences, Inc.



By:

/s/ Ann A.
Rosar


Name:

Ann A. RosarTitle:

Chief Accounting OfficerDate:

November 12, 2010
583 A.2d 341

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STEVEN DRAKE.

March 20, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8, No. 333-86923) pertaining to the American Physician Partners, Inc. 1996
Stock Option Plan of Radiologix, Inc. of our report dated February 7, 2003 with
respect to the 2002 consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Radiologix, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2002.

                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 21, 2003
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1158 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the two-year 

waiting period for divorced spouse’s benefits following the divorce. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

the two-year waiting period for divorced spouse’s benefits 

following the divorce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM TWO-YEAR WAITING PERIOD 

4 FOR DIVORCED SPOUSE’S BENEFITS FOL5 LOWING THE DIVORCE IN CASES OF PRIOR 

6 RECEIPT OF SPOUSE’S BENEFITS. 

7 (a) WIFE’S INSURANCE BENEFITS.—Section 

8 202(b)(4)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 402(b)(4)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘divorced wife—’’ 

10 and all that follows through ‘‘shall be entitled’’ and insertVerDate Aug 31 2005 03:50 Feb 22, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1158.IH H1158

hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 1158 IH

1 ing ‘‘divorced wife meets the requirements of subpara2 graphs (A) through (D) of paragraph (1), shall be enti3 tled’’. 

4 (b) HUSBAND’S INSURANCE BENEFITS.—Section 

5 202(c)(4)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402(c)(4)(A)) is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘divorced husband—’’ and all that 

7 follows through ‘‘shall be entitled’’ and inserting ‘‘divorced 

8 husband meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A) 

9 through (D) of paragraph (1), shall be entitled’’. 

10 (c) EXEMPTION FROM DEDUCTIONS ON ACCOUNT OF

11 WORK.—Section 203(b)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

12 403(b)(2)) is amended— 

13 (1) by striking ‘‘(2)(A) Except as’’ and all that 

14 follows through ‘‘the benefit to which’’ and inserting 

15 the following: ‘‘(2) In any case in which any of the 

16 other persons referred to in paragraph (1)(B) is en17 titled to monthly benefits as a divorced spouse under 

18 subsection (b) or (c) of section 202 for any month, 

19 the benefit to which’’; and 

20 (2) by striking subparagraph (B). 

21 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

22 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply with 

23 respect to benefits for months after the date of the enact24 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS