57794 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 22, 2010 / Notices 

from them. There is no change in the 

Commission’s reporting and/or third 

party disclosure requirements. There is 

no change in the Commission’s burden 

estimates. 

This collection includes rules to 

govern the future operation and 

licensing of the 220–222 MHz band (220 

MHz service). In establishing this 

licensing plan, FCC’s goal is to establish 

a flexible regulatory framework that 

allows for efficient licensing of the 220 

MHz service, eliminates unnecessary 

regulatory burdens, and enhances the 

competitive potential of the 220 MHz 

service in the mobile service 

marketplace. However, as with any 

licensing and operational plan for a 

radio service, a certain number of 

regulatory and information burdens are 

necessary to verify licensee compliance 

with FCC rules. 

The information collection burdens 

under this OMB control number 

consists of documentation burden for 

two emergency medical use (EMRS) 

applicants; supporting documentation 

from governmental entities with EMRS 

jurisdiction; construction benchmark 

documentation for 2 nationwide, Phase 

II land mobile or paging system 

licensees (5 and 10 years after initial 

grant); construction benchmark 

documentation for EA and Regional 

Phase II land Mobile or paging system 

licensees (5 and 10 years after initial 

license grant); technical analysis burden 

on EA and Regional licensees; consent 

obtained by EA and Regional licensees 

to locate stations less than required 

distance from Phase I licensees’ stations; 

coordination among EA and Regional 

licensees to exceed established field 

strength; and license renewal 

documentation. 

The various reporting and verification 

requirements and the requirement that 

licensees coordinate and provide 

written consent, concurrence or 

agreement with other licensees, will be 

used by the Commission to verify 

licensee compliance with Commission 

rules and regulations and to ensure that 

licensees continue to fulfill their 

statutory responsibilities in accordance 

with the Communications Act of 1934, 

as amended. Such information has been 

used in the past and will continue to be 

used to minimize interference, verify 

that applicants are legally, technically, 

and financially qualified to hold 

licenses, and to determine compliance 

with Commission rules. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary, 

Office of the Secretary, 

Office of Managing Director. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23608 Filed 9–21–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–S 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Submitted for 

Review and Approval to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), 

Comments Requested 

September 16, 2010. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 – 

3520. Comments are requested 

concerning: (a) Whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Commission, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

Commission’s burden estimate; (c) ways 

to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information collected; (d) 

ways to minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on the 

respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology; 

and (e) ways to further reduce the 

information collection burden for small 

business concerns with fewer than 25 

employees. 

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) comments should be 

submitted on or before October 22, 

2010. If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting PRA comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the FCC contact listed below as 

soon as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of 

Management and Budget, via fax at 202– 

395–5167 or via the Internet at 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and 

to the Federal Communications 

Commission via e-mail to PRA@fcc.gov. 

To view a copy of this information 

collection request (ICR) submitted to 

OMB: (1) Go to the Web page http:// 

reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, (2) 

look for the section of the web page 

called ‘‘Currently Under Review’’, (3) 

click on the downward–pointing arrow 

in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the 

‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4) 

select ‘‘Federal Communications 

Commission’’ from the list of agencies 

presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, 

(5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the right 

of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, and (6) 

when the list of FCC ICRs currently 

under review appears, look for the title 

of this ICR (or its OMB Control Number, 

if there is one) and then click on the ICR 

Reference Number to view detailed 

information about this ICR. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Judith B. Herman, Office of Managing 

Director, (202) 418–0214. For additional 

information or copies of the information 

collection(s), contact Judith B. Herman, 

OMD, 202–418–0214 or email judith– 

b.herman@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0975. 

Title: Sections 68.3 and 1.4000, 

Promotion of Competitive Networks in 

the Local Telecommunications Markets 

Multiple Tenant Environments (MTEs). 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other for– 

profit, not–for–profit institutions, 

federal government, and state, local or 

tribal government. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 5,874 respondents, 5,874 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: .5 

hours to 10 hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement and third party 

disclosure requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. Statutory 

authority for this information collection 

is contained in 47 CFR 151 et seq. 

Total Annual Burden: 194,284 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: N/A. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality. 

Needs and Uses: The Commission 

will submit this expiring information 

collection during this comment period 

to obtain the full three year clearance 

from the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB). The Commission is 

submitting this information collection 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 183 / Wednesday, September 22, 2010 / Notices 57795 

as an extension (no change in the 

reporting and third party disclosure 

requirements. The Commission is 

reporting a 21,598 hour adjustment 

decrease which is due to fewer 

respondents. 

This information collection involves 

information regarding the location of the 

demarcation point, antennas placed on 

subscriber premises, and the state of the 

market. The demarcation point burden 

consists of two components: (1) The 

local exchange carrier (LEC) shall make 

available information on the location of 

the demarcation point within ten 

business days of a request from the 

premises owner (location information); 

and (2) at the time of installation, the 

LEC shall fully inform the premises 

owner of its options and rights regarding 

the placement of the demarcation point 

or points (options information). 

The Over–the–Air Reception Devices 

(OTARDS) portion of this information 

collection as a condition of invoking 

protection under 47 CFR 1.4000 from 

government, landlord, and association 

restrictions, a licensee must ensure that 

subscriber antennas are labeled to give 

notice of potential radio frequency 

safety hazards of these antennas. 

Labeling information (third party 

disclosure requirement) should include 

minimum separation distances required 

between users and radiating antennas to 

meet the Commission’s radio frequency 

exposure guidelines. Labels should also 

include reference to the Commission’s 

applicable radio frequency exposure 

guidelines and should use the ANSI– 

specified warning symbol for radio 

frequency exposure. In addition, the 

instruction manuals and other 

information accompanying subscriber 

transceivers should include a full 

explanation of the labels, as well as a 

reference to the applicable Commission 

radiofrequency exposure guidelines. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary, 

Office of the Secretary, 

Office of Managing Director. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23607 Filed 9–21–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–S 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the 

Federal Communications Commission, 

Comments Requested 

September 16, 2010. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 – 

3520. Comments are requested 

concerning: (a) whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Commission, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

Commission’s burden estimate; (c) ways 

to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information collected; (d) 

ways to minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on the 

respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

and (e) ways to further reduce the 

information collection burden on small 

business concerns with fewer than 25 

employees. 

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) comments should be 

submitted on or before November 22, 

2010. If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting PRA comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the FCC contact listed below as 

soon as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of 

Management and Budget, via fax at 202– 

395–5167 or via the Internet at 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and 

to the Federal Communications 

Commission via email to PRA@fcc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Judith B. Herman, Office of Managing 

Director, (202) 418–0214. For additional 

information, contact Judith B. Herman, 

OMD, 202–418–0214 or email judith– 

b.herman@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0741. 

Title: Implementation of the Local 

Competition Provisions in the 

Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC 

Docket No. 96–98, Second Report and 

Order and Memorandum Opinion and 

Order; Second Order on 

Reconsideration; CC Docket No. 99–273, 

First Report and Order. 

Form No.: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other for– 

profit. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 5,907 respondents; 573,767 

responses. 

Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour 

to 547,500 hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion, 

annual and one time reporting 

requirements, recordkeeping 

requirement and third party disclosure 

requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. Statutory 

authority for this information collection 

is contained in 47 U.S.C. sections 151, 

153, 154, 201, 222, and 251. 

Total Annual Burden: 575,448 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: N/A. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

The Commission is not requesting 

respondents to submit confidential 

information to the Commission. As 

previously noted, however, each ILEC is 

to provide public notice of proposed 

network changes. If the ILEC claims that 

information that they are required to 

disclose is confidential or proprietary, 

the ILEC’s public notice must include a 

statement that the ILEC will make 

further information available to those 

signing a nondisclosure agreement. 

Upon receipt by an ILEC of a 

competing service provider’s request for 

disclosure of confidential or proprietary 

information, the applicable public 

notice period will be tolled until the 

parties agree on the terms of a 

nondisclosure agreement. See 47 CFR 

51.335. 

Needs and Uses: The Commission 

will submit this expiring information 

collection after this comment period to 

obtain the three year clearance from the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB). There is no change to the 

reporting, recordkeeping and/or third 

arty disclosure requirements. However, 

the Commission is reporting a 

significant increase in the number of 

responses and total annual burden 

hours. This increase is because the 

Commission believes that LECs now 

generally provide not only one transfer 

of information but daily updates in 

response to the requests they may 

receive for directory assistance and DA 

listings. While this increases the 

number of times that LECs are providing 

the DA information, it is understood 

that this is a generally an automated 

process, so the costs and time involved 

with all of these responses should be 

relatively small. As a result, this 

submission will show that the overall 

cost for compliance with these 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES