alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-25-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-25-2000
<CASH>                                           13,427
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    92,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                     108,052
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                222,935
<PP&E>                                          191,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  471,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            84,899
<BONDS>                                           9,269
<COMMON>                                        343,154
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    471,836
<SALES>                                         117,341
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                117,341
<CGS>                                            74,905
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   106,440
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    653
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9,712
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3,691
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               6,021
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      6,021
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.31
EX-34.2
(logo) pwc


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland
Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association ("Midland" or the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the commercial
mortgage-backed securities transactions (the "Platform"), as of December 31,
2011 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),
1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii),
1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has
determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with
respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the
Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and
determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and
performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and
servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this
report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from
errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Midland Loan Services complied with
the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2011 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 24, 2012


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106
T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890, www.pwc.com/us
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50060 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LAURA MARQUEZ DE ALVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-521-ALL-DB

- - - - - - - - - - September 10, 2002 Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Laura Marquez de Alvarez (Marquez) appeals her conviction for making a false statement regarding a matter within the jurisdiction of a government agency in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. While attempting to cross the border from Mexico, Marquez informed a United States Customs Service inspector that she owned the vehicle she was driving. She later admitted that this statement was false. Marquez contends that the evidence isNo. 02-50060 -2- insufficient to support her conviction because this statement was not material given that the customs inspector had already decided to conduct an intensive inspection of her vehicle prior to speaking with her. The customs inspector testified that he questions drivers and passengers at the border regarding the ownership of the vehicle they are in to determine whether they are familiar with the vehicle and its contents. When the owner is not present, this raises his suspicions and influences his decision whether to inspect the vehicle, as well as the scrutiny with which he inspects a vehicle. This evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s determination that the false statement regarding ownership of the vehicle was capable of influencing a decision within the jurisdiction of the United States Customs Service. See United States v. Gaudin , 515 U.S. 506 (1995); United States v. Puente , 982 F.2d 156 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of GlobeTel  Communications  Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Timothy Huff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully  complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Timothy M. Huff
Chief Executive Officer
May 12, 2006


                                       23
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,117,613
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (16,555)
<INVENTORY>                                    828,323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,127,561
<PP&E>                                         125,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,408,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          554,553
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,542
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,853,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,408,363
<SALES>                                      1,638,268
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,638,268
<CGS>                                        1,582,042
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,582,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,850,503
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,990
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,617,560)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,617,560)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,617,560)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.13)
        

</TABLE>
583 A.2d 327

#### LESLIE (ROGERS) STAHL v. WILLIAM NORTON STAHL.

February 26, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 110-343), the Salmon-Challis National Forest's Central Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will conduct a business meeting which is open to the public.

# DATES:

Thursday, October 7, 2010, beginning at 1 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Public Lands Center, 1206 South Challis Street, Salmon, Idaho.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Agenda topics will include review of RAC 2010                           ( print page 58348)                        projects, planning for the 2011 project approval meetings and other RAC business. The meeting is an open public forum. Some RAC members may attend the meeting by conference call, telephone, or electronically.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Frank V. Guzman, Forest Supervisor and Designated Federal Officer, at 208-756-5111.

Dated: September 10, 2010.

Frank V. Guzman,

Forest Supervisor, Salmon-Challis National Forest, Public Lands Center, 1206 South Challis Street, Salmon, Idaho. 

[FR Doc. 2010-23899 Filed 9-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
News United States Air Force
 AMC relocates KC-135 simulatorPublished April 15, 2016
                        
                        By Air Mobility Command Public Affairs
                **SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, Ill. (AFNS) --**
                Air Mobility Command will relocate a KC-135 Stratotanker pilot simulator from McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas, to Rickenbacker Air National Guard Base, Ohio, in an effort to maximize simulator utilization across the mobility enterprise.As the KC-46A Pegasus is fielded, displaced KC-135 simulators will be relocated across the total force of active-duty and Air Force Reserve component installations. AMC, in coordination with the Air National Guard, identified four KC-135 pilot flight simulators and one KC-135 Boom Operator Weapon System Trainer to be relocated as a result of the KC-46A allocations to McConnell AFB and Pease ANGB, New Hampshire.The first KC-135 pilot flight simulator and the BOWST were relocated from McConnell AFB to Altus AFB, Oklahoma, in April 2015. The second pilot simulator will be relocated from Pease ANGB to Pittsburgh ANGB, Pennsylvania, in October 2016. The third pilot simulator is scheduled to be relocated from McConnell AFB to Rickenbacker ANGB in October 2017. A decision on the relocation of the remaining simulator is expected at a later date.AMC operates 19 KC-135 pilot flight simulators and nine BOWSTs at 13 regional sites worldwide to support 42 KC-135 units.simulator 



FM 



KC-135 



KC-46 



AMC
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-22-00349-CV

Scott Ralph WHEELOCK aka Scott Wheelock, 

Appellant

v.

KERR COUNTY, Headwaters Groundwater Conservation District, Kerr County Emergency 

Services District #2, Kerr County Lateral Roads, Upper Guadalupe River Authority, Harper 

Independent School District,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21317A

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA, JUSTICE WATKINS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s May 24, 2022 judgment 

is AFFIRMED. Appellant’s December 28, 2022 Motion for Attorneys to Show Authority is 

DENIED. We order appellant to pay the costs of this appeal.

SIGNED February 22, 2023.

_____________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
IIA 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 100 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Received 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Appointing the day for the convening of the first session 

of the One Hundred Eleventh Congress and establishing 

the date for the counting of the electoral votes for President and Vice President cast by the electors in December 

2008. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

HJ 100 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. DAY FOR CONVENING OF ONE HUNDRED ELEV2 ENTH CONGRESS. 

3 The first regular session of the One Hundred Elev4 enth Congress shall begin at noon on Tuesday, January 

5 6, 2009. 

6 SEC. 2. DATE FOR COUNTING 2008 ELECTORAL VOTES IN 

7 CONGRESS. 

8 The meeting of the Senate and House of Representa9 tives to be held in January 2009 pursuant to section 15 

10 of title 3, United States Code, to count the electoral votes 

11 for President and Vice President cast by the electors in 

12 December 2008 shall be held on January 8, 2009 (rather 

13 than on the date specified in the first sentence of that 

14 section). 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
#### J. P. Addington v. G. W. Bryson.

(No. 2612, Op. Book No. 2, p. —.)

Appeal from Cooke County.

Opinion by

Walker, R. S., P. J.

§ 1292. *Continuance; discretion of court in hearing application for.*The direction of and control over the various steps required to be taken in the progress of a trial, except so far as they are regulated by statute or by rules established by the supreme court for the regulation of trials in the inferior courts, are, and of necessity must be, left to the discretion of the court trying the cause. *751The exercise of a proper discretion on this subject involves the necessity of the court exacting from litigants before it reasonable diligence and promptitude in doing at the proper time those things which due progress and reasonable dispatch in the disposition of the cause requires. The action of a court in the exercise of this discretion will not be revised by the appellate court unless it is made apparent that the discretion has been abused to the-probable injury of the party who complains of such action. Application for a continuance should, as a general rule, be made when the case is called for trial. [Sayles & Bassett’s Pl. &Pr. § 574; R. S. 1288.] In this case the application for continuance was not made when the case was called for trial, and the court refused to postpone the case to give time for it to be made, and no facts being shown which made it apparent that the court had abused the discretion confided to it by the law, and it not being made to appear that appellant has suffered injury without fault of his own, it was held that the action of the-court complained of w'ould not be revised.

April 18, 1883.

§ 1293. *New trial; motion*for, *based on action of the court in refusing to grant time to make application for continuance.*It devolved on appellant, on his motion for a new trial, to negative the idea by affidavit that his failure to ask for a continuance under a sworn statement therefor at the proper time was the result of his own fault or neglect, supported by affidavit of the absent witness, if it could be procured, as to the facts he would testify to, or of his own, of such facts as said witness would testify to, if the affidavit of the witness could not be procured in time. [Ward v. Cobbs, 14 Tex. 304; Spencer v. Kinnard, 12 Tex. 180; Chilson v. Reeves, 29 Tex. 280.]

Affirmed.
News United States Air Force
 Tuskegee Airman laid to restPublished June 9, 2016
                        
                        By Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs
                **ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) --**
                The Air Force paid its final respects to former 2nd Lt. Malvin G. Whitfield, an Army Air Forces and Air Force veteran, at Arlington National Cemetery, June 8. Whitfield distinguished himself as the first U.S. military member to win Olympic gold medals while serving his country. Whitfield joined the Army Air Corps in 1943 as a Tuskegee Airman, one of more than 1,000 African-American pilots who fought in World War II.
Whitfield later served as a youth and sports affairs officer for the U.S. Information Agency. He he traveled to more than 132 countries and played a key role in training and developing African athletes.
Whitfield established the Whitfield Foundation in 1989. The organization promoted athletics around the world with scholarships, training programs and equipment donations. According to the organization’s website, the late President Ronald Reagan wrote the following about Whitfield:
"Whether flying combat missions over Korea, or winning gold medal after gold medal at the Olympics, or serving as an ambassador of goodwill among the young athletes of Africa, you have given your all. This country is proud of you, and grateful to you."
Whitfield was 91 when he died on Nov. 19, 2015.Tuskegee Airmen 



Arlington 



heritage
News United States Air Force
 45 units gather to support 30th Golden Coyote at Ellsworth AFBPublished June 26, 2014
                        
                        By Senior Airman Zachary Hada
                        
                        
                        28th Bomb Wing Public Affairs
                **ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE, S.D. (AFNS) --**
                Ellsworth Air Force Base continued its history of providing vital assets and support during the South Dakota National Guard's, or SDNG, 30th Golden Coyote training exercise June 7 to 21.Forty-Five Air Force, Army and Navy military units, representing 15 states and personnel from four foreign nations, participated in the exercise. It provided realistic training scenarios focused on honing skills required for overseas contingency operations and homeland defense.Maj. Anthony Deiss, the SDNG public affairs officer, said participants engaged in various training tasks and battle drills such as combat patrols, urban combat operations, land navigation, first aid, casualty evacuation and convoy operations."Participating units train(ed)on their equipment, conduct(ed) military operations and employ(ed) tactics, as well as complete(d) various engineer projects and humanitarian missions that will help improve the forest and infrastructure of many local communities," Deiss said.Ellsworth AFB Airmen from a wide range of career fields provided vital support and services to ensure the success of the exercise. For example, Airmen from the 28th Force Support Squadron served more than 700 service members breakfast and dinner at Camp Lancer throughout the duration of the training.In addition to support and services, many Airmen participated in various training scenarios.During a high angle exercise, firefighters from the 28th Civil Engineer Squadron and SDNG’s 451st Engineer Detachment practiced techniques they would utilize if victims become stranded or trapped in a location not easily accessible from the ground.Spc. Adam North, a SDNG 451st ED Firefighting Team specialist, said he appreciated having the chance to test skills he and his fellow firefighters rarely get to use."This opportunity to train is invaluable and prepares us for things we might face during real-world situations," North said. "Every year we come out to Ellsworth and the people here have been real helpful and supportive with assisting us with our training."Golden Coyote 



Ellsworth AFB 



South Dakota Army National Guard