alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
763 A.2d 357

#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Frank E. LITTLE, Respondent.

Nos. 12 and 68 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Nov. 13, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 2000, a Rule having been entered upon respondent by this Court on September 22, 2000, to show cause why he should not be disbarred and no response having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute, Frank E. Little is disbarred from the Bar of this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1189 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1189

                To preserve the right to habeas corpus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2007

    Mr. Wu (for himself, Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Larson of 
 Connecticut, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Gilchrest, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, 
 and Mr. DeFazio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
 the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committees on 
  the Judiciary and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                To preserve the right to habeas corpus.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``The Habeas Corpus Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. HABEAS CORPUS.

    Nothing in the Military Commissions Act of 2006 or any amendment 
made by that Act shall affect the right of any resident of the United 
States of America to habeas corpus. The preceding sentence shall be 
construed in accordance with the 5th and 14th Amendments to the 
Constitution of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.1


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT
TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of the 6th day of
July, 2014, between ERB PROPOCO SAV LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Seller”), and
SENTIO STAV LANDLORD, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Buyer”).


 


RECITALS:


 


		A.	Seller and Buyer are parties to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement dated May 22, 2014, as
amended (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which Seller agreed to sell, and Buyer agreed to purchase, certain real
property located at 13801 East Yale Avenue, Aurora, Colorado, as more particularly described in the Agreement.



 


		B.	Seller and Buyer desire to amend the Agreement to extend
the Due Diligence Period.



 


NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


AGREEMENTS:


 


1.     Recitals,
Definitions. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference. Capitalized but undefined
terms used in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.


 


2.     Section
1.1. The definition of the Due Diligence Period is hereby amended to read as follows:


 


Due Diligence Period:
The period commencing on the Effective Date and ending on 6:00 PM Eastern Time on July 7, 2014, during which time Buyer may, at
reasonable times with prior notice to Seller, investigate the financial, legal, operational, environmental and all other aspects
of the Property as Buyer may desire.


 


3.     Effect
of Amendment. To the extent any provisions contained herein conflict with the Agreement or any other agreements between
Seller and Buyer, oral or otherwise, the provisions contained herein shall supersede such conflicting provisions contained in the
Agreement or other agreements. Except as specifically modified by this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect
and is in all events ratified, confirmed and approved.


 


4.     Counterparts.
This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which, together,
shall constitute one and the same instrument. Delivery of signatures by e-mail or facsimile shall be valid and binding.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


	 	BUYER:
	 	 
	 	SENTIO STAV LANDLORD, LLC
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ John Mark Ramsey
	 	Name: John Mark Ramsey
	 	Its:  Authorized Signatory
	 	 
	 	SELLER:
	 	 
	 	ERB PROPCO SAV LLC
	 	 
	 	By: ERB PROPCO HOLDCO I LLC
	 	Its: Sole Member
	 	 
	 	By: ERB SENIOR LIVING, L.L.C.
	 	Its: Sole Member
	 	 
	 	By: EVERGREENSLP, LLC
	 	Its: Manager
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Brian E. Dowd
	 	Name: Brian E. Dowd
	 	Title: Chief Financial Officer


 




    	2
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 78 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1006]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                CHANGE OF COMMAND OF ADMIRAL SKIP DIRREN

                                 ______

                         HON. TILLIE K. FOWLER

                               of florida

                    in the house of representatives

                         Thursday, May 11, 1995
  Mrs. FOWLER. Mr. Speaker, I would like to take this opportunity to 
pay tribute to Rear Adm. Frank M. ``Skip'' Dirren, Jr., who has been 
the commander of Naval Base Jacksonville since July of 1992, and who 
will be leaving us tomorrow to accept a new command in Norfolk, VA. 
Admiral Dirren is a man of character, courage and compassion and an 
outstanding naval officer. I am proud to call him my friend.
  If it is true that ``nothing is really work unless you would rather 
be doing something else,'' as J.M. Barrie once said, then Skip Dirren 
has not done a lick of work since he joined the Navy in 1964. He loves 
his job and is the quintessential Navy man--patriotic, loyal, and 
devoted to duty. A decorated veteran helicopter pilot, he has made the 
Navy his life, and he exemplifies the virtues that I associate with the 
service at its best.
  Skip is also a fine leader and good man to have in your corner, as he 
has consistently demonstrated during his tenure in Jacksonville. His 
turn at the helm of our Navy complex has helped to steer our facilities 
and personnel through some very rough waters, and he has strengthened 
the already good relationship between the community and its Naval 
facilities in many ways.
  His community activism has particularly endeared him to our citizens, 
and his warmth and eloquence have made him a much sought-after speaker. 
In short, he has become a respected and beloved member of the 
community, and his generosity, his kindness, and his many talents will 
be greatly missed.
  Mr. Speaker, although the business of the House prevents me from 
attending Admiral Dirren's change of command ceremony tomorrow, my 
thoughts will be with him and his lovely wife, Susan, as they celebrate 
a job well done and prepare to enter a new chapter in their life 
together. I hope they know that they take with them the gratitude and 
affection of our entire city. I wish them both fair winds and following 
seas.

                          ____________________
```
#### HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY v. AETNA LIFE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.

February 28, 1984.

Petition for certification granted.
762 A.2d 1081

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Respondent, v. Michael DRISCOLL, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Nov. 1, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED and the order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed. *See Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation v. McCafferty,*563 Pa. 146, 758 A.2d 1155 (2000).
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 88 (Thursday, May 25, 1995)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1125]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

               TRIBUTE TO RHODES COLLEGE MOCK TRIAL TEAM

                                 ______

                          HON. HAROLD E. FORD

                              of tennessee

                    in the house of representatives

                        Wednesday, May 24, 1995
  Mr. FORD. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize and pay tribute to 
members of the Rhodes College Mock Trial Team for winning the 1995 
National Intercollegiate Mock Trial Tournament. Rhodes College, a 
prestigious four year liberal arts college in my congressional 
district, has for six consecutive years, sent a group of students to 
the National Intercollegiate Mock Trial Tournament. For four out of six 
years, the Rhodes College Mock Trial Team has captured this 
distinguished award.
  These undergraduates deserve special mention because they have 
developed the vital skills of communication, advocacy and rhetoric. 
Mastery of these skills will make them well qualified for careers in 
public service, the professions or business. Led by Political Science 
Professor Marc Pohlman and Memphis Attorney Whit Gurkin, the team 
consisted of the following Rhodes students: Melissa Berry of Searcy 
Arkansas, Ryan Feeney of Marietta, Georgia, Jenny Hall of Bartlett, 
Tennessee, Mike Hart of Monroe, Louisiana, Nikki Holzhauer of Columbus, 
Mississippi, Karen Jones of Collierville, Tennessee and Gina Yannitell 
of Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The team participated in a trial involving a 
train which struck an automobile. Because evidence existed that both 
parties were negligent, the court had to decide proportional 
responsibility what damages would be awarded.
  This year, the team competed in the regional tournament which 
qualified it to compete in the national tournament in Des Moines, Iowa 
on April 5, 1995. A distinguished panel of Iowa Supreme Court Justices 
and federal judges judged the competition. The jury was comprised of 
prominent state and local citizens including Iowa Governor Robert Ray. 
Rhodes joined 72 other colleges and universities in Des Moines and 
defeated St. Johns University, Northwestern University, University of 
Minnesota, Dayton University and Loras College to win the national 
championship. Among the prominent schools that participated in the 
competition were Brown, Cornell, Duke, Grinnell, Johns Hopkins, 
Northwestern, and Yale.
  The Rhodes Mock Trial Team is carrying on the college's tradition of 
advocacy and debate. Its continued success is a tribute to the quality 
of higher education in Tennessee's Ninth Congressional District. I am 
proud and honored to recognize this important milestone.

                          ____________________
```
763 A.2d 376

#### JEFFERSON COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania v. The COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, Pennsylvania, the 54th Judicial District. Appeal of the County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania. Jefferson County, a Political Subdivision of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania v. The Court of Common Pleas of Jefferson County, Pennsylvania, The 54th Judicial District. Appeal of the Jefferson County Commissioners.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Dec. 20, 2000.

*565Jeffrey Lundy, Lukehart & Lundy, Punxsutawney, for Jefferson County.

Anthony T. McBeth, Robert L. Knupp, Knupp & Kodak, P.C., Harrisburg, for County Com’rs Ass’n of Pa.

Maryellen Gallagher, Philadelphia, for CCP Jefferson County-

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2000, the order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.
Exhibit 35.3

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

I, Karen Montbach, a
Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the Company), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2011 between GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC (LNR Partners) as successor Special Servicer to Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee (the Agreement), the following:

1. A review of the Companys activities
as Certificate Administrator during the reporting period ending December 31, 2015 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2015, the Company has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

This statement is given by the undersigned
as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigneds individual capacity.

Date: February 26, 2016



Citibank, N.A.By:

/s/ Karen MontbachName:

Karen MontbachTitle:

Managing Director
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23696]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7179]


Determination and Certification Related to Colombian Armed Forces 
Under Section 7046(B) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, 
and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Division F, Pub. L. 111-
117)

    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of State, 
including under section 7046(b) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. 
L. 111-117) (``FY 2010 SFOAA''), I hereby determine, certify, and 
report that the Colombian Armed Forces are meeting the conditions 
contained in section 7046(b)(1)(B) and section 7046(b)(2) of the 
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs 
Appropriations Act, 2009 (Div. H, Pub. L. 111-8) (``FY 2009 SFOAA'').
    Pursuant to section 7046(b) of the FY 2010 SFOAA, the Department of 
State has periodically consulted with Colombian and internationally 
recognized human rights organizations regarding the Colombian Armed 
Forces' progress in meeting the above-mentioned conditions, as provided 
in section 7046(c) of the FY 2009 SFOAA.
    This Determination and Certification shall be published in the 
Federal Register, and copies shall be transmitted to the appropriate 
committees of Congress.

    Dated: September 9, 2010.
James B. Steinberg,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-23696 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1123 

To amend the Black Lung Benefits Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. RAHALL (for himself and Mr. BOUCHER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Black Lung Benefits Act, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Black Lung Benefits 

5 Survivors Equity Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EQUITY FOR CERTAIN ELIGIBLE SURVIVORS. 

7 (a) REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION.—Section 411(c)(4) 

8 of the Black Lung Benefits Act (30 U.S.C. 921(c)(4)) is 

9 amended by striking the last sentence. 

10 (b) CONTINUATION OF BENEFITS.—Section 422(l) of 

11 the Black Lung Benefits Act (30 U.S.C. 932(l)) is amendmstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 1123 IH

1 ed by striking ‘‘, except with respect to a claim filed under 

2 this part on or after the effective date of the Black Lung 

3 Benefits Amendments of 1981,’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 18, 2009 (the
Quarterly Report) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: June 24, 2009
    /s/ Andrew F. PuzderAndrew F. PuzderChief Executive Officer
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000919606
<NAME> VENDALUX CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 18
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,053
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,274
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,309)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   18
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  86
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (86)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (86)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (86)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)




<PAGE>



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1023 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1023

  To repeal the imposition of withholding on certain payments made to 
                    vendors by government entities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2007

    Mr. Meek of Florida (for himself and Mr. Herger) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the imposition of withholding on certain payments made to 
                    vendors by government entities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF IMPOSITION OF WITHHOLDING ON CERTAIN PAYMENTS MADE 
              TO VENDORS BY GOVERNMENT ENTITIES.

    The amendment made by section 511 of the Tax Increase Prevention 
and Reconciliation Act of 2005 is hereby repealed and the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied as if such amendment had never 
been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 92 (Wednesday, June 7, 1995)]
[House]
[Pages H5627-H5628]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

ABSENCE OF APPROVAL BY ETHICS COMMITTEE REVIVES TALK OF OUTSIDE COUNSEL 
                         ON SPEAKER'S BOOK DEAL

  (Ms. DeLAURO asked and was given permission to address the House for 
1 minute and to revise and extend her remarks.)
  Ms. DeLAURO. Mr. Speaker, earlier this year, Speaker Gingrich 
promised to get approval for his book deal from the Ethics Committee 
before signing the contract. Now, the Speaker has embarked on a 
nationwide book tour, so the Ethics Committee must have given its OK, 
right? Wrong.
  In fact, the Ethics Committee did not get a chance to rule on the 
propriety of the Speaker's multimillion-dollar book contract, before it 
received a letter from Mr. Gingrich's lawyer saying that Mr. Gingrich 
was going ahead with the deal. The letter reads: ``We will assume that 
Mr. Gingrich's book publishing complies with House rules.''
  But, the chairwoman and the ranking member of the committee quickly 
wrote back to Mr. Gingrich's lawyer saying: ``You should make no such 
assumption.'' This advice was ignored.
  The Speaker never received approval from the Ethics Committee on his 
book contract, as he promised. Mr. Gingrich's wanton disregard of the 
Ethics Committee makes the case for an outside counsel to investigate 
the other charges pending against him. The Speaker will be unable to 
ignore the ruling of an outside counsel in the way [[Page H5628]] that 
he has ignored the Ethics Committee.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                          816,433
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   215,634
<ALLOWANCES>                    19,131
<INVENTORY>                     12,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,123,526
<PP&E>                          179,328
<DEPRECIATION>                  6,097
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,469,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           8,150
<BONDS>                         1,612,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        1,000
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,469,613
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                25,449
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                105,364
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              71,622
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (151,537)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (151,537)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (151,537)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (152)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (152)



</TABLE>