alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, September 23, 2010 at 2 p.m.

                    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain                           ( print page 57313)                        staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.                

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, September 23, 2010 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: September 16, 2010.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-23523 Filed 9-16-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
News United States Air Force
 Aviano AB F-16 accident report releasedPublished Oct. 30, 2013
                **RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany (AFNS) --**
                U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa officials released the results of their investigation into the Jan. 28 crash of an F-16 Fighting Falcon over the Adriatic Sea, resulting in the death of the pilot on board.
At the conclusion of the investigation, the board president, Brig. Gen. Derek P. Rydholm, found clear and convincing evidence that the pilot suffered symptoms of spatial disorientation, due to a combination of weather conditions, the pilot's use of night vision goggles, the aircraft's attitude and high rate of speed, and the pilot's breakdown in visual scan. The pilot ejected, but did not survive the crash.
At the time of the incident, the pilot, Capt. Lucas Gruenther, was a member of the 555th Fighter Squadron, 31st Fighter Wing, Aviano Air Base, Italy. He was promoted to the grade of major posthumously.
The convening authority, USAFE-AFAFRICA Vice Commander Lt. Gen. Tom Jones, approved the board president's report without comments.
The primary purpose of the board was to provide a releasable report of the facts and circumstances surrounding the incident. An executive summary and full narrative of the report is available on the Air Force Legal Operations Agency Claims and Tort Litigation website at http://usaf.aib.law.af.mil/ . The full report is available by submitting a Freedom of Information Act request. An electronic request may be submitted at http://www.foia.af.mil.
For more information contact the USAFE-AFAFRICA Public Affairs Office at 011-49-6371-47-6558.
*(Courtesy of U.S. Air Forces Europe – Air Forces Africa Public Affairs)*Air Force Africa 



F-!6 



U.S. Air Forces Europe Related Links
        Air Force Legal Operations Agency Claims and Tort Litigation website
            
            Official U.S. Air Forces Europe - Air Forces Africa website
            
            Air Force Freedom of Infomation Act website
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         903,903
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,446,155
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,959,969
<PP&E>                                     106,198,863
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,612,196
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,366,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,595,346
<BONDS>                                     56,194,099
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           48,400
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,272,491
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                94,366,236
<SALES>                                     21,382,931
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,382,931
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,081,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,502,972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,235,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,603,259
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,041,298
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,561,961
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,561,961
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6606

DAVID H. SUTTLE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

M. HUGHES; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, District

Judge. (CA-95-29-MU)

Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 26, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David H. Suttle, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent

that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a

certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Suttle v. Hughes, No. CA-95-29-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 19, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND AS OF
JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                  0000919601
<NAME> VENDALUX CORP
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 45
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,023
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1274
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,253)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   45
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  29
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (29)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (29)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (29)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
763 A.2d 358

#### In the Matter of Garry A. NELSON. Petition for Reinstatement.

No. 535 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Nov. 17, 2000.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2000, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated September 14, 2000, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 181 (Monday, September 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 57287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-23379]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLMT926000-10-L19100000-BJ0000-LRCM08RS4649]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; Montana

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plats of survey.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM Montana State Office, 
Billings, Montana, on October 20, 2010.

DATES: Protests of the survey must be filed before October 20, 2010 to 
be considered.

ADDRESSES: Protests of the survey should be sent to Branch of Cadastral 
Survey, Bureau of Land Management, 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings, 
Montana 59101-4669.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marvin Montoya, Cadastral Surveyor, 
Branch of Cadastral Survey, Bureau of Land Management, 5001 Southgate 
Drive, Billings, Montana 59101-4669, telephone (406) 896-5124 or (406) 
896-5009.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was executed at the request of 
the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Rocky Mountain Region, Billings, Montana, 
and was necessary to determine individual and tribal trust lands.
    The lands we surveyed are:

Principal Meridian, Montana

T. 27 N., R. 52 E.

    The plat, in 1 sheet, representing the corrective dependent 
resurvey of a portion of the section line between sections 12 and 13, 
the dependent resurvey of a portion of the subdivisional lines, a 
portion of the subdivision of sections 11 and 13, and the adjusted 
original meanders of the former left bank of the Missouri River, 
downstream, through sections 11 and 13, the subdivision of sections 11 
and 13, and the survey of the meanders of the present left bank of the 
Missouri River and an informative traverse, downstream, through 
portions of sections 11 and 13 and certain division of accretion lines 
in Township 27 North, Range 52 East, Principal Meridian, Montana, was 
accepted September 3, 2010.
    We will place a copy of the plat, in 1 sheet, and related field 
notes we described in the open files. They will be available to the 
public as a matter of information. If the BLM receives a protest 
against this survey, as shown on this plat, in 1 sheet, prior to the 
date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our 
consideration of the protest. We will not officially file this plat, in 
1 sheet, until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all protests 
and they have become final, including decisions or appeals.

    Authority:  43 U.S.C. Chap. 3.

    Dated: September 14, 2010.
James D. Claflin,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Resources.
[FR Doc. 2010-23379 Filed 9-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 141, Number 80 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[House]
[Page H4917]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                            MORNING BUSINESS

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the order of the House of 
January 4, 1995, the Chair will now recognize Members from lists 
submitted by the majority and minority leaders for morning hour 
debates. The Chair will alternate recognition between the parties, with 
each party limited to not to exceed 30 minutes, and each Member except 
the majority and minority leader limited to not to exceed 5 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Florida [Mr. Mica] for 5 
minutes.

                          ____________________
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,588
<SECURITIES>                                     7,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                       835
<INVENTORY>                                     10,673
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,952
<PP&E>                                           8,207
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,429
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,950
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,196
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,283
<SALES>                                         10,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,196
<CGS>                                           11,466
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,363
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   835
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  73
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,639)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,143)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,496)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,496)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.48)
        

</TABLE>
News United States Air Force
 US bomber fleet unifies under 8th Air Force, Air Force Global Strike Command leadershipPublished Sept. 29, 2015
                        
                        By Maj. Phil Ventura
                        
                        
                        2nd Bomb Wing Public Affairs
                **BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, La. (AFNS) --**
                Two bomb wings from the Air Combat Command ceremonially realigned Sept. 28 to Global Strike Command's 8th Air Force, bringing all of the service's bomber fleet under a single command.The move joins B-1B Lancers from Dyess Air Force Base, Texas' 7th Bomb Wing and Ellsworth AFB, South Dakota's 28th BW, with B-52H Stratofortresses and B-2 Spirits already residing within Eighth Air Force, strengthening the U.S. Air Force's entire long range strike fleet."All five bomb wings and the long range strike capability they provide to our nation are stronger today as a result of this homecoming," said Maj. Gen. Richard Clark, the 8th Air Force commander.While the transfer of authority involves 63 aircraft and approximately 7,000 personnel, most Airmen will not perceive an immediate change to the way they do business, according to the general. Instead, benefits will be realized over time as crosstalk increases and new opportunities arise for aviators and maintainers in the bomber community.Still, as a career B-1B command pilot with more than 4,000 hours in the airframe and multiple assignments across the bomber community, Clark realizes that the transfer of commands has caused some apprehension."Change of any kind can be tough at first," Clark said. "However, this realignment makes practical sense and is grounded in our past as an air force."Re-enforcing the general's point, both the 7th and 28th BWs have been assigned to the "Mighty Eighth" at several points -- the first time in the late 1940s and most recently as 2002, according to 8th Air Force Historian Lane Callaway.At the strategic level, the consolidation will "provide a unified voice to maintain the high standards necessary in stewardship of our nation's bomber forces," Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James said in an April news release announcing the move.In addition to the consolidation of the bomber fleet at 8th Air Force, the Global Strike Command is also taking lead on the Long Range Strike Bomber program from Air Combat Command and, with the arrival of Gen. Robin Rand in July, was elevated from a three to four star-led command.Reflecting on all of these changes, Clark said, "Whether it is in the B-1, B-2, or B-52, it is a great time to be a bomber Airman. We are standing on the shoulders of giants and have great days ahead."Dyess AFB 



7th BW 



Ellsworth AFB 



28th BW 



B-52 Stratofortress 



B-2 Spirit 



Eighth Air Force 



B-1B Lancer
583 A.2d 317

#### EDISON SQUARE ASSOCIATES, ETC. v. WILLIAM GRAULICH, III.

February 6, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1009 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1009

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from 
          the definition of marihuana, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2007

  Mr. Paul (for himself, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. 
 Grijalva, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Kucinich, Mr. McDermott, Mr. George Miller 
  of California, Mr. Stark, and Ms. Woolsey) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 
   in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from 
          the definition of marihuana, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF INDUSTRIAL HEMP FROM DEFINITION OF MARIHUANA.

    Paragraph (16) of section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 
U.S.C. 802(16)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(16)'' at the beginning and inserting 
        ``(16)(A)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(B) The term `marihuana' does not include industrial hemp. As 
used in the preceding sentence, the term `industrial hemp' means the 
plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of such plant, whether growing or 
not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration that does not 
exceed 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.''.

SEC. 3. INDUSTRIAL HEMP DETERMINATION TO BE MADE BY STATES.

    Section 201 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 811) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Industrial Hemp Determination To Be Made by States.--In any 
criminal action, civil action, or administrative proceeding, a State 
regulating the growing and processing of industrial hemp under State 
law shall have exclusive authority to determine whether any such plant 
meets the concentration limitation set forth in subparagraph (B) of 
paragraph (16) of section 102 and such determination shall be 
conclusive and binding.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James L. ANZALONE, Appellant.

No. 97-2932.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Oct. 7, 1998.

On the motion of the en banc court, the September 22, 1998 order granting en bane consideration is vacated, the court’s opinion and judgment of June 30, 1998 are reinstated, and the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied. Chief Judge Bowman, Judge McMillian, Judge Fagg, Judge Hansen, and Judge Murphy would grant the suggestion.
583 A.2d 323

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EDWARD H. SPENCER.

February 14, 1990.

Petition for certification denied.